alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Research Resources Initial Review Group, Comparative Medicine Review Committee. RIRG-C—Parent Meeting.                    

*Date:*                         October 9-10, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         John R. Glowa, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Center for Research Resources, or, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., 1 Democracy Plaza, Room 1078, MSC 4874, Bethesda, MD 20892-4874, 301-435-0807,                         *glowaj@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 93.306, 93.333, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 7, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-4573 Filed 9-14-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed December 5, 2017 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01098-CR 

No. 05-17-01099-CR 

No. 05-17-01103-CR 

SALBADOR AMARO, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. F15-60526-J, F16-75004-J, F16-75005-J 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Bridges, Myers, and Schenck 

Opinion by Justice Bridges 

 Before the Court is Salbador Amaro’s November 21, 2017 motion to abandon the 

appeals. In the motion, appellant states that he no longer desires to pursue the appeals. Counsel 

has signed the motion and affixed an exhibit signed by appellant showing his consent to allow 

counsel to abandon the appeals. We GRANT appellant’s motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). 

We dismiss the appeals. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47 

171098F.U05

 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

SALBADOR AMARO, Appellant 

No. 05-17-01098-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 3, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F15-60526-J. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. 

Justices Myers and Schenck participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered December 5, 2017. 

 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

SALBADOR AMARO, Appellant 

No. 05-17-01099-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 3, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F16-75004-J. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. 

Justices Myers and Schenck participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered December 5, 2017. 

 
 –4– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

SALBADOR AMARO, Appellant 

No. 05-17-01103-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 3, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F16-75005-J. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. 

Justices Myers and Schenck participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered December 5, 2017.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOHN MASON HUGHES

,

Appellant,

v.

EASY STREET CAPITAL , L

. L

. C

. ;

RUSSELL FROST , Trustee

, HORNET

CAPITAL , L

. L

. C

. , and PATRICK E.

HUDSON , Trustee

,

Appellee s

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 0003 2

- CV

Appeal from the

201st District Court

of Travis County, Texas 1

(TC# D

- 1

- GN

- 18

- 005944 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be

dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that the clerk ’ s record has not been filed because

Appellant John Mason Hughes has failed to make financial arrangements to pay for the clerk ’ s

record, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

The Travis County District Clerk notified the Court that Appellant has not made financial

arrangements to pay for preparation of the clerk ’ s record as required by T EX .R.A PP .P. 35.3(a)(2 ).

The Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that the Court intended to dismiss the appeal for want

of prosecution unless Appellant responded within ten days and showed grounds for continuing

1 We hear this case on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 41.3.2

the appeal. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not file d any response establishing that he

is entitled to appeal without paying for the clerk ’ s record or that he has made arrangements to

pay for preparation of the clerk ’ s record. We conclude that the clerk ’ s record has not been filed

due to the fault of the A ppellant. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

See T EX .R.A PP .P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

April 1 5 , 2020

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, J J.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 134 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                           May 8, 2001.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution the conference report to 
accompany the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 83) establishing the 
congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2002, 
revising the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal 
year 2001, and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for each of fiscal 
years 2003 through 2011 is hereby recommitted to the committee of conference.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Ella J. T. Roche, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn, and Newton Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
Gordon Bennett

 TELE: 1+717-571-2274

FlyingMonkey2@hotmail.com

Flashnine@msn.com

June 16, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590

 

Re: Exemption Request Section 333 , Addendum to docket : FAA -2015-1392

As requested by: Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Flying Monkey Aerial Videography will be flying:

2 - Walkera 350 Pro Quad Copters , with camera gimbals and video cameras weighing 3550 

grams or 7.92 Lbs. Both contain auto pilot function and geo -fencing capabilities.

1- Foam American eagle look alike fixed wing , single electric motor aircraft with APM 2.6 

auto pilot and geo fencing capabilities. A video camera and transmitter weighing a total of 

4.3 Lbs. Manufacture: Hobby King Models for fix wing RC airplane. Auto pilot functions by 

Flying Monkey Aerial Videography

1- 14 Ft. Helium blimp tethered, Manufacturer Arizona Balloon Company , with no motors , 

with a amp 2.6 auto pilot system for telemetry for geo fencing capabilities. This system is set 

up for video services by Flying Monkey Aerial Videography and APM 2.6 is the fail safe for 

auto deflate in case of fly away. Telemetry with GPS down link for location. (Safety First ) 

Total Weight with Cameras and Transmitters is 9 Lbs.

Part 101 - Moored Balloons, Kits , Amateur Rockets and Unmanned free Balloons thru Part 101.19 - 

Rapid deflation device

Gordon Bennett
###### Editorial Note on Part 385

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 385.303T How does a motor carrier register with the FMCSA?

A motor carrier may contact the FMCSA by internet (*www.fmcsa.dot.gov*); or Washington, DC headquarters by mail at, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001; fax 202-366-3477; or telephone 1-800-832-5660, and request the application materials for a new entrant motor carrier. Forms can also be downloaded from *https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/registration/registration-forms.* A motor carrier which does not already have a USDOT number must apply online via the Unified Registration System (URS) at *www.fmcsa.dot.gov/urs.*

[82 FR 5304, Jan. 17, 2017]
**Exhibit 24-2**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS** that I, **Nicholas DeBenedictis** do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and William A. VonHoene, Jr., or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2007 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**Nicholas DeBenedictis**

**DATE: February 4, 2008**
§ 37.107 Acquisition of passenger rail cars by private entities primarily engaged in the business of transporting people. ( a ) A private entity which is primarily engaged in the business of transporting people and whose operations affect commerce, which makes a solicitation after February 25, 1992, to purchase or lease a new rail passenger car to be used in providing specified public transportation, shall ensure that the car is readily accessible to, and usable by, individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs. The accessibility standards in part 38 of this title which apply depend upon the type of service in which the car will be used.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, a private entity which is primarily engaged in transporting people and whose operations affect commerce, which remanufactures a rail passenger car to be used in providing specified public transportation to extend its useful life for ten years or more, or purchases or leases such a remanufactured rail car, shall ensure that the rail car, to the maximum extent feasible, is made readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs. For purposes of this paragraph, it shall be considered feasible to remanufacture a rail passenger car to be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs, unless an engineering analysis demonstrates that doing so would have a significant adverse effect on the structural integrity of the car.
( c ) Compliance with paragraph (b) of this section is not required to the extent that it would significantly alter the historic or antiquated character of a historic or antiquated rail passenger car, or a rail station served exclusively by such cars, or would result in the violation of any rule, regulation, standard or order issued by the Secretary under the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970. For purposes of this section, a historic or antiquated rail passenger car means a rail passenger car— ( 1 ) Which is not less than 30 years old at the time of its use for transporting individuals;
( 2 ) The manufacturer of which is no longer in the business of manufacturing rail passenger cars; and
( 3 ) Which— ( i ) Has a consequential association with events or persons significant to the past; or
( ii ) Embodies, or is being restored to embody, the distinctive characteristics of a type of rail passenger car used in the past, or to represent a time period which has passed.
1210-AB32-2-1549.html[7/26/2015 7:20:42 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 11, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jx3-kzyl

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2046

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jack Banowsky

General Comment

I am concerned that regulations are being enacted that would put limits on how I spend my 401K and IRA

 retirement savings.

These are private accounts funded by my hard work! I do not want the government to tell me how or where to

 spend that money. Government's role should only be to provide valuable information to help people decide for

 themselves how to spend their money, not to dictate or direct through regulation!
#### Edwin W. Hall, Appellant, v. The Whitehall Water Power Company, Limited, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs on opinion below.

Landon, J., not acting.
**Exhibit 24.1**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS**that I, **John A. Canning, Jr.** do hereby appoint JohnW. Rowe and William A. Von Hoene, Jr., or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2008 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto,to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**John A. Canning, Jr.**

**DATE: February 2, 2009**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                        823,361
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 31,850
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              860,773
<PP&E>                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                5,355,586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         29,425
<BONDS>                       0
<COMMON>                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    5,261,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  5,355,586
<SALES>                       433,981
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              461,795
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 34,660
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              53,266
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               351,078
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           351,078
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  351,078
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 9.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                 9.01
        

</TABLE>
#### § 378.6 Claim records.

At the time a claim is received the carrier shall create a separate file and assign it a successive claim file number and note that number on all documents filed in support of the claim and all records and correspondence with respect to the claim, including the written acknowledgment of receipt required under § 378.7. If pertinent to the disposition of the claim, the carrier shall also note that number on the shipping order and delivery receipt, if any, covering the shipment involved.

[47 FR 12804, Mar. 25, 1982, as amended at 62 FR 15425, Apr. 1, 1997; 83 FR 16225, Apr. 16, 2018]
**Exhibit32-b**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofCinergy Corp., The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, PSI Energy, Inc.and The Union Light, Heat and Power Company (the “Companies”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lynn J. Good, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to thebest of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

                (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

                (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompanies.

 

Date:  February 28,2006

 
| /s/ Lynn J. Good |                    |
|------------------|-------------------------|
|             | Lynn J. Good            |
|             | Chief Financial Officer |
|                  |                         |  |

 

----
-----Original Message-----

From: Robert Mann [mailto:roemann@bellsouth.net] 

Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 6:58 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

I support the proposed new rules. The fact that numerous lobbying groups for the insurance industry are 

so loudly opposing them convinces me that they are best for the consumer. Thanks. 

Robert Mann

Sandy Springs, GA
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0525.html[7/20/2015 8:09:10 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-38kd

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0525

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jeff Barber

Address:

2805 Rocky Ridge Dr

El Paso, TX, 79904

Email: elpasojeff033110@hotmail.com

Phone: 915-757-7819

General Comment

I can manage my own retirement portfolio
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1

       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JAN-3-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                        805,583
<SECURITIES>                  1,164,222
<RECEIVABLES>                 2,513,098
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   4,477,440
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              10,116,658
<PP&E>                        12,991,485
<DEPRECIATION>                9,474,989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                13,706,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         2,122,349
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      1,294,952
<OTHER-SE>                    10,004,572
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  13,706,403
<SALES>                       4,275,155
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              4,275,155
<CGS>                         2,375,107
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 2,375,107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               437,746
<INCOME-TAX>                  160,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  277,746
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .18
        

</TABLE>
[Coös,

December, 1881.]

#### Parsons *v.*Hilliard & *a.*

*James I. Parsons,*for the plaintiff.

*Dudley Sf Remich, W. H. Shurtleff,*and *Ray, Dreiv Jordan,*for the defendants.

Carpenter, J.

In an action referred by agreement there is no right of review. *Bennett*v. Atwood, 57 N. H. 216; *Carroll*v. *Locke,*58 N. H. 163; *Rand*v. *Merchants’ Despatch Co.,*60 N. H. 276.

Doe, C. J., did not sit: the others concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>          SEP-30-1996

<CASH>                        2,509,950 
<SECURITIES>                       0    
<RECEIVABLES>                    92,173 
<ALLOWANCES>                       0    
<INVENTORY>                        0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              2,602,123 
<PP&E>                        9,241,166 
<DEPRECIATION>                  365,170 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               11,609,953 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,373,951 
<BONDS>                            0    
<COMMON>                           0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0    
<PREFERRED>                        0    
<OTHER-SE>                    6,487,752 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 11,609,953 
<SALES>                         867,808 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                946,561 
<CGS>                              0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   487,393 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                252,397 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                830,000 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (623,229)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (475,277)
<DISCONTINUED>                  423,000 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0    
<CHANGES>                          0    
<NET-INCOME>                    (52,277)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     (1.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (1.06)

        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0380

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MARY DARLEAN WRIGHT,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 10, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 8 2021

12/08/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0380