alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1513.html[7/23/2015 12:32:34 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-o3mm

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1513

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Gov't -- stay out of my retirement saving. You have bankrupted Social Security and I don't believe I will see any

 of my Social Security 

"contribution" which has been taken from my pay for 33 year continually. I can manage my own 401K and

 IRAs.
§ 37.105 Equivalent service standard. For purposes of §§ 37.101 and 37.103 of this part, a fixed route system or demand responsive system, when viewed in its entirety, shall be deemed to provide equivalent service if the service available to individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs, is provided in the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of the individual and is equivalent to the service provided other individuals with respect to the following service characteristics: ( a ) ( 1 ) Schedules/headways (if the system is fixed route);
( 2 ) Response time (if the system is demand responsive);
( b ) Fares;
( c ) Geographic area of service;
( d ) Hours and days of service;
( e ) Availability of information;
( f ) Reservations capability (if the system is demand responsive);
( g ) Any constraints on capacity or service availability;
( h ) Restrictions priorities based on trip purpose (if the system is demand responsive).
1210-AB32-2-1513.html[7/26/2015 6:40:39 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwm-l2sn

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2009

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

As an American citizen I am strongly opposed to any regulation that will restrict use of my own money, for

 retirement or any other time.
1210-AB32-2-1259.html[7/24/2015 9:42:45 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvu-qx8r

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1754

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Michael Sorgenfrei

Address:

4435 Canadian River

Sugar Land, TX, 77478

Email: Michael_and_Adeline@yahoo.com

Phone: 281-980-3455

General Comment

Dear EBSA

I can handle my own retirement. I don't need the government doing it for me. Please keep away from my

 investments. I have earned this on my own and I don't need you telling me how to handle it.
- 20150803095418664
- 20150803095439816
- 20150803095451697
- 20150803095900241
- 20150803095909200
- 20150803100141520
- 20150803100150787
- 20150803100157896
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1053.html[7/22/2015 7:10:06 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-yec3

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1053

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: LR Jensen

General Comment

This proposal is outrageous and another way for government to take away freedom; freedom

to plan for my retirement without the government sticking it's nose into my business.

I know how to plan for my retirement and don't want or need any governmental regulations telling me what to

 do.
sourceTypeIDisLeapYearmonthID monthVMTFraction

11 Y 1 0.072904

11 Y 2 0.072023

11 Y 3 0.081529

11 Y 4 0.082098

11 Y 5 0.087286

11 Y 6 0.088052

11 Y 7 0.092096

11 Y 8 0.093198

11 Y 9 0.08447

11 Y 10 0.086301

11 Y 11 0.080029

11 Y 12 0.080015

21 Y 1 0.072904

21 Y 2 0.072023

21 Y 3 0.081529

21 Y 4 0.082098

21 Y 5 0.087286

21 Y 6 0.088052

21 Y 7 0.092096

21 Y 8 0.093198

21 Y 9 0.08447

21 Y 10 0.086301

21 Y 11 0.080029

21 Y 12 0.080015

31 Y 1 0.072904

31 Y 2 0.072023

31 Y 3 0.081529

31 Y 4 0.082098

31 Y 5 0.087286

31 Y 6 0.088052

31 Y 7 0.092096

31 Y 8 0.093198

31 Y 9 0.08447

31 Y 10 0.086301

31 Y 11 0.080029

31 Y 12 0.080015

32 Y 1 0.072904

32 Y 2 0.072023

32 Y 3 0.081529

32 Y 4 0.082098

32 Y 5 0.087286

32 Y 6 0.088052

32 Y 7 0.092096

32 Y 8 0.093198

32 Y 9 0.08447

32 Y 10 0.086301

32 Y 11 0.080029

32 Y 12 0.080015

41 Y 1 0.072904

41 Y 2 0.072023

41 Y 3 0.081529
41

Y4 0.082098

41Y5 0.087286

41Y6 0.088052

41Y7 0.092096

41Y8 0.093198

41Y9 0.08447

41Y 10 0.086301

41Y 11 0.080029

41Y 12 0.080015

42Y1 0.072904

42Y2 0.072023

42Y3 0.081529

42Y4 0.082098

42Y5 0.087286

42Y6 0.088052

42Y7 0.092096

42Y8 0.093198

42Y9 0.08447

42Y 10 0.086301

42Y 11 0.080029

42Y 12 0.080015

43Y1 0.072904

43Y2 0.072023

43Y3 0.081529

43Y4 0.082098

43Y5 0.087286

43Y6 0.088052

43Y7 0.092096

43Y8 0.093198

43Y9 0.08447

43Y 10 0.086301

43Y 11 0.080029

43Y 12 0.080015

51Y1 0.072904

51Y2 0.072023

51Y3 0.081529

51Y4 0.082098

51Y5 0.087286

51Y6 0.088052

51Y7 0.092096

51Y8 0.093198

51Y9 0.08447

51Y 10 0.086301

51Y 11 0.080029

51Y 12 0.080015

52Y1 0.072904

52Y2 0.072023

52Y3 0.081529

52Y4 0.082098

52Y5 0.087286

52Y6 0.088052

52Y7 0.092096
52

Y8 0.093198

52Y9 0.08447

52Y 10 0.086301

52Y 11 0.080029

52Y 12 0.080015

53Y1 0.072904

53Y2 0.072023

53Y3 0.081529

53Y4 0.082098

53Y5 0.087286

53Y6 0.088052

53Y7 0.092096

53Y8 0.093198

53Y9 0.08447

53Y 10 0.086301

53Y 11 0.080029

53Y 12 0.080015

54Y1 0.072904

54Y2 0.072023

54Y3 0.081529

54Y4 0.082098

54Y5 0.087286

54Y6 0.088052

54Y7 0.092096

54Y8 0.093198

54Y9 0.08447

54Y 10 0.086301

54Y 11 0.080029

54Y 12 0.080015

61Y1 0.072904

61Y2 0.072023

61Y3 0.081529

61Y4 0.082098

61Y5 0.087286

61Y6 0.088052

61Y7 0.092096

61Y8 0.093198

61Y9 0.08447

61Y 10 0.086301

61Y 11 0.080029

61Y 12 0.080015

62Y1 0.072904

62Y2 0.072023

62Y3 0.081529

62Y4 0.082098

62Y5 0.087286

62Y6 0.088052

62Y7 0.092096

62Y8 0.093198

62Y9 0.08447

62Y 10 0.086301

62Y 11 0.080029
62 Y 12 0.080015
§ 38.53 Doorways. ( a ) *Clear width.* ( 1 ) Passenger doorways on vehicle sides shall have clear openings at least 32 inches wide when open.
( 2 ) If doorways connecting adjoining cars in a multi-car train are provided, and if such doorway is connected by an aisle with a minimum clear width of 30 inches to one or more spaces where wheelchair or mobility aid users can be accommodated, then such doorway shall have a minimum clear opening of 30 inches to permit wheelchair and mobility aid users to be evacuated to an adjoining vehicle in an emergency.
( b ) *Signage.* The International Symbol of Accessibility shall be displayed on the exterior of accessible vehicles operating on an accessible rapid rail system unless all vehicles are accessible and are not marked by the access symbol. (See Fig. 6.)
( c ) *Signals.* Auditory and visual warning signals shall be provided to alert passengers of closing doors.
( d ) *Coordination with boarding platform* — ( 1 ) *Requirements.* Where new vehicles will operate in new stations, the design of vehicles shall be coordinated with the boarding platform design such that the horizontal gap between each vehicle door at rest and the platform shall be no greater than 3 inches and the height of the vehicle floor shall be within plus or minus 5 ⁄ 8 inch of the platform height under all normal passenger load conditions. Vertical alignment may be accomplished by vehicle air suspension or other suitable means of meeting the requirement.
( 2 ) *Exception.* New vehicles operating in existing stations may have a floor height within plus or minus 11 ⁄ 2 inches of the platform height. At key stations, the horizontal gap between at least one door of each such vehicle and the platform shall be no greater than 3 inches.
( 3 ) *Exception.* Retrofitted vehicles shall be coordinated with the platform in new and key stations such that the horizontal gap shall be no greater than 4 inches and the height of the vehicle floor, under 50% passenger load, shall be within plus or minus 2 inches of the platform height.
###### Editorial Note on Part 325

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 325 appear at 66 FR 49869, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 325.27 Use of a windscreen.

A properly installed windscreen, of the type recommended by the manufacturer of the Sound Level Measurement System, shall be used during the time that noise emission measurements are being taken.
Exhibit 23-2

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-49887,  33-54935,  33-59152) of PECO Energy
Company and  Subsidiary  Companies of our report dated January 30, 2001,  except
for Note 22 PETT  Refinancing  for which the date is March 1, 2001,  relating to
the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this
Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
April 2, 2001
-----Original Message----- 

From: sarahpol@humboldt1.com [mailto:sarahpol@humboldt1.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:45 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sarah Scher, MD 

770 Tenth Street 

Arcata, CA 95521
#### § 29.417 Must a Tribe continue performance of the Tribal Transportation Program or the Tribal Transit Program under a compact and funding agreement if the Department does not transfer sufficient funds?

A Tribe does not have to continue performance of the Tribal Transportation Program (23 U.S.C. 202(b)) or the Tribal Transit Program (49 U.S.C. 5311(c)(1)) that requires an expenditure of funds in excess of the amount of funds included in a funding agreement. If at any time the Tribe has reason to believe that the total amount included in a funding agreement is insufficient, the Tribe must provide reasonable notice of such insufficiency to the Self-Governance Official. If the Department does not increase the amount of funds included in the funding agreement for the Tribal Transportation Program or Tribal Transit Program, the Tribe may suspend performance of the program activity until such time as the Department transfers additional funds.
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–343 

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE. CONFERENCE 

REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 3199, USA PATRIOT IMPROVEMENT AND REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2005 

DECEMBER 13, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 595] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 595, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report to accompany H.R. 3199, the USA PATRIOT Improvement 

and Reauthorization Act of 2005, and against its consideration. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order is necessary because the conference report contains matter in addition to that which was committed to the conference committee, which does not meet the scope 

requirements contained in clause 9 of rule XXII. 

Æ
1210-AB32-2-1427.html[7/26/2015 4:56:41 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwb-7exo

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1923

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: phillip eller

Address:

1046 memorial park road

Lancaster, SC, 29720

Email: aecarservice@gmail.com

Phone: 980 319 0404

General Comment

I am very capable to plan my retirement. Government needs to back away from this issue.
§ 29.931 How can the Department or the Tribe obtain review of the recommended decision of an administrative law judge? ( a ) *Time for filing.* Within 30 days after service of any recommended decision of an administrative law judge, the Department or the Tribe may file a petition for review of the recommended decision with the Secretary. A copy must be served on the opposing party.
( b ) *Service.* Each document filed with or by the Secretary must be accompanied by a certificate of service specifying the manner in which and the date on which service was made with the Secretary and the opposing party.
( c ) *Form and content of objections.* The petition for review must set out separately and in detail each objection to the recommended decision, and the basis and reasons supporting such objection. The petition for review must state whether such objections are related to alleged errors of law or fact. The petition for review must also identify the relief requested.
( d ) *Introduction of new information on review.* If the Department or the Tribe fail to object to any errors in the recommended decision, the party waives the right to allege such error in subsequent proceedings. The petition for review may not set forth for the first time on brief to the Secretary any matters of law or fact that were not argued before the administrative law judge.
( e ) *Reply briefs.* An opposing party has 30 days from the date of service of the petition for review to file its reply brief.
( f ) *Failure to file timely and adequate objections.* Late filed petitions for review are not permitted, and incomplete objections will not be reviewed.
H. Res. 195

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 17, 2001.

Whereas at 11:09 p.m., eastern daylight time on July 14,

2001, the United States successfully tested an interceptor

missile against a target Minuteman intercontinental ballistic missile in flight;

Whereas the target missile was launched from Vandenburg

Air Force Base, California, and was traveling at approximately 140 miles above the Earth at a speed of greater

than 11,000 feet per second, which is more than three

times faster than a high-powered rifle bullet, when struck

by the interceptor missile;

Whereas the interceptor missile was also traveling at a speed

greater than 11,000 feet per second at the time of impact;

Whereas more than 35,000 Americans contributed to the successful test, including the Air Force team which launched

the target missile from Vandenburg Air Force Base and

the Army team which developed the radar and kill vehicle, the Navy and Coast Guard team which provided security for the test, the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization team which supervised the testing program, and

the contractor team consisting of thousands of American

scientists, engineers, and blue collar workers employed by
2

•HRES 195 EH

the prime contractors and hundreds of small businesses;

and

Whereas the House of Representatives understands that testing of ballistic missile defenses will involve many failures

as well as successes in the future, the House of Representatives nonetheless commends the effort and ingenuity of those who worked so hard to make the test a

success: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives thanks and

commends the thousands of United States military and Government personnel, contractors, engineers, scientists, and

workers who worked diligently to make the July 14, 2001,

missile defense intercept test a success.

Attest:

Clerk.
1210-AB32-2-1526.html[7/26/2015 6:52:13 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwo-ctbs

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2023

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: KENNETH SURRATT

Address:

13423 HIRAM RD

WILLS POINT, TX, 75169

Email: sirrodent@hotmail.com

Phone: 9725639676

General Comment

DON'T TOUCH MY RETIREMENT OR SAVINGS
#### § 236.5 Design of control circuits on closed circuit principle.

All control circuits the functioning of which affects safety of train operation shall be designed on the closed circuit principle, except circuits for roadway equipment of intermittent automatic train stop system.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 19, 2017

No. 04-17-00148-CR

Benjamin POEHLMANN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR10018

Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant's Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. 

The Appellant's Brief is due August 16, 2017.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of July, 2017.

___________________________________

Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
1210-AB32-2-1214.html[7/24/2015 8:30:05 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvs-7isr

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1709

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I can plan and exercise my retirement without the government interfering. Do not mess with it!
Editorial Note on Part 393
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 393.110 What else do I have to do to determine the minimum number of tiedowns? ( a ) When tiedowns are used as part of a cargo securement system, the minimum number of tiedowns required to secure an article or group of articles against movement depends on the length of the article(s) being secured, and the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section. These requirements are in addition to the rules under § 393.106.
( b ) When an article is not blocked or positioned to prevent movement in the forward direction by a headerboard, bulkhead, other cargo that is positioned to prevent movement, or other appropriate blocking devices, it must be secured by at least: ( 1 ) One tiedown for articles 5 feet (1.52 meters) or less in length, and 1,100 pounds (500 kg) or less in weight;
( 2 ) Two tiedowns if the article is: ( i ) 5 feet (1.52 meters) or less in length and more than 1,100 pounds (500 kg) in weight; or
( ii ) Longer than 5 feet (1.52 meters) but less than or equal to 10 feet (3.04 meters) in length, irrespective of the weight.
( 3 ) Two tiedowns if the article is longer than 10 feet (3.04 meters), and one additional tiedown for every 10 feet (3.04 meters) of article length, or fraction thereof, beyond the first 10 feet (3.04 meters) of length.
( c ) If an individual article is blocked, braced, or immobilized to prevent movement in the forward direction by a headerboard, bulkhead, other articles which are adequately secured or by an appropriate blocking or immobilization method, it must be secured by at least one tiedown for every 3.04 meters (10 feet) of article length, or fraction thereof.
( d ) *Special rule for special purpose vehicles.* The rules in this section do not apply to a vehicle transporting one or more articles of cargo such as, but not limited to, machinery or fabricated structural items (e.g., steel or concrete beams, crane booms, girders, and trusses, etc.) which, because of their design, size, shape, or weight, must be fastened by special methods. However, any article of cargo carried on that vehicle must be securely and adequately fastened to the vehicle.
[67 FR 61225, Sept. 27, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 35833, June 22, 2006]