alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                       8,304,461
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,307,845
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,436,831
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,991,265
<PP&E>                                         329,671
<DEPRECIATION>                                 217,924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,898,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,135,535
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    212,936
<COMMON>                                        28,723
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,898,320
<SALES>                                      3,781,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,952,796
<CGS>                                        1,112,007
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,327,423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,625,373
<INCOME-TAX>                                   591,635
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,033,738
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,033,738
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Max & Erma's, Restaurants, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending May 11, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William C. Niegsch, Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr.
---------------------------
William C. Niegsch, Jr.




June 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc.,
and will be retained by Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       17
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 118 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 25, 2001.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 41) proposing an amendment 
to the Constitution of the United States with respect to tax limitations. The 
joint resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution and any 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) two 
hours of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; (2) an amendment in the 
nature of a substitute printed in the Congressional Record pursuant to clause 8 
of rule XVIII, if offered by the Minority Leader or his designee, which shall be 
considered as read and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally 
divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act that meetings of the Cedar Creek and Belle Grove National Historical Park Advisory Commission will be held to discuss the development of the Park's general management plan.

*Dates and Locations:*                         September 20, 2007, at the Warren County Government Center, 220 N. Commerce Ave., Front Royal, VA; December 13, 2007, at the Strasburg Town Hall Council Chambers, 174 East King St., Strasburg, VA; March 20, 2008, at the Middletown Town Hall Council Chambers, 7875 Church St., Middletown, VA; and June 19, 2008, at the Warren County Government Center.                    

All meetings will convene at 9 a.m. and are open to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Diann Jacox, Superintendent, Cedar Creek and Belle Grove National Historical Park, (540) 868-9176.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Topics to be discussed at the meetings include: Review of draft plan, general management plan public comments, planning process and schedule, land protection planning, environmental impact analysis, election of a commission chair, and commission sub-committees.

Dated: July 31, 2007. 

Christopher J. Stubbs, 

Acting Superintendent, Cedar Creek and Belle Grove National Historical Park. 

 [FR Doc. 07-4078 Filed 8-20-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-AN-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PHI GROUP, INC.. on Form 10-Q for the period ending 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Fahman, President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Henry FahmanHenry FahmanPresident/DirectorNovember 10, 2009

---
§ 375.209 How must I handle complaints and inquiries? ( a ) You must establish and maintain a procedure for responding to complaints and inquiries from your individual shippers.
( b ) Your procedure must include all three of the following items: ( 1 ) A communications system allowing individual shippers to communicate with your principal place of business by telephone.
( 2 ) A telephone number.
( 3 ) A system for recording in writing all inquiries and complaints received from an individual shipper by any means of communication.
( c ) You must produce a clear and concise written description of your procedure for distribution to individual shippers.
[68 FR 35091, June 11, 2003, as amended at 77 FR 36934, June 20, 2012; 77 FR 59824, Oct. 1, 2012; 83 FR 16224, Apr. 16, 2018]
###### Editorial Note on Part 195

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.400 Scope.

This subpart prescribes minimum requirements for operating and maintaining pipeline systems constructed with steel pipe.
Editorial Note on Part 365
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 365 appear at 66 FR 49870, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 365.101 Applications governed by these rules. These rules govern the handling of applications for operating authority of the following type: ( a ) Applications for certificates of motor carrier registration to operate as a motor carrier of property or passengers.
( b ) Applications for permits to operate as a freight forwarder.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) Applications for licenses to operate as a broker of motor vehicle transportation.
( e ) Applications for certificates under 49 U.S.C. 13902(b)(3) to operate as a motor carrier of passengers in intrastate commerce over regular routes if such intrastate transportation is to be provided on a route over which the carrier provides interstate transportation of passengers.
( f ) [Reserved]
( g ) Applications for temporary motor carrier authority.
( h ) Applications for Mexico-domiciled motor carriers to operate in foreign commerce as common, contract or private motor carriers of property (including exempt items) between Mexico and all points in the United States. A Mexico-domiciled motor carrier may not provide point-to-point transportation services, including express delivery services, within the United States for goods other than international cargo.
( i ) Applications for non-North America-domiciled motor carriers to operate in foreign commerce as for-hire motor carriers of property and passengers within the United States.
( j ) The rules in this part do not apply to “pipeline welding trucks” as defined in 49 CFR 390.38(b).
[59 FR 63728, Dec. 9, 1994, as amended at 60 FR 63981, Dec. 13, 1995; 62 FR 49940, Sept. 24, 1997; 67 FR 12714, Mar. 19, 2002; 67 FR 61820, Oct. 2, 2002; 73 FR 76488, Dec. 16, 2008; 74 FR 2901, Jan. 16, 2009; 81 FR 47720, July 22, 2016; 80 FR 63704, Oct. 21, 2015; 86 FR 57068, Oct. 14, 2021] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 82 FR 5299, Jan. 17, 2017, § 365.101 was suspended, effective Jan. 14, 2017. At 86 FR 57068, Oct. 14, 2021, the suspension was lifted and amendments were made to § 365.101. In that same document, § 365.101 was again suspended indefinitely.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                              
<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>                        
        This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the
    Partnership's  audited  financial  statements for the quarter ended December
    31, 1996 and is qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such  financial
    statements.
</LEGEND>                       
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
                                    
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                  1,482
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               3
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,927
<PP&E>                                 16,855
<DEPRECIATION>                          6,778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         12,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     478
<BONDS>                                 6,832
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                              5,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           12,511
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        2,089
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           1,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            97
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        97
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                               97
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            3.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                            3.28
        

</TABLE>
#### § 3.1 Description.

The official seal of the Department of Transportation is described as follows: A white abstract triskelion figure signifying motion appears within a circular blue field. The figure is symmetrical. The three branches of the figure curve outward in a counter-clockwise direction, each tapering almost to a point at the edge of the field. Surrounding the blue circle is a circular ring of letters. The upper half of the ring shows the words “Department of Transportation”. The lower half of the ring shows the words “United States of America”. The letters may be shown in either black or medium gray. The official seal of the Department is modified when embossed. It appears below in black and white.

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC02FE91.096/EC02FE91.096_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC02FE91.096/EC02FE91.096_original_size.png)
§ 380.109 Driver testing. ( a ) *Testing methods.* The driver-student must pass knowledge and skills tests in accordance with the following requirements, to determine whether a driver-student has successfully completed an LCV driver-training program as specified in subpart B of this part. The written knowledge test may be administered by any qualified driver-instructor. The skills tests, based on actual operation of an LCV, must be administered by a qualified LCV skills instructor. ( 1 ) All tests shall be constructed to determine if the driver-student possesses the required knowledge and skills set forth in Appendix F to this part for the specific type of LCV training program being taught.
( 2 ) Instructors shall develop their own tests for the specific type of LCV-training program being taught, but those tests must be at least as stringent as the requirements set forth in paragraph (b) of this section.
( 3 ) LCV driver-instructors shall establish specific methods for scoring the knowledge and skills tests.
( 4 ) Passing scores must meet the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
( 5 ) Knowledge and skills tests shall be based upon the information taught in the LCV training programs as set forth in Appendix F to this part.
( 6 ) Each knowledge test shall address the training provided during both theoretical and behind-the-wheel instruction, and include at least one question from each of the units listed in the table to Appendix F to this part, for the specific type of LCV training program being taught.
( 7 ) Each skills test shall include all the maneuvers and operations practiced during the Proficiency Development unit of instruction (behind-the-wheel instruction), as described in Appendix F to this part, for the specific type of LCV training program being taught.
( b ) *Proficiency determinations.* The driver-student must meet the following conditions to be certified as an LCV driver: ( 1 ) Answer correctly at least 80 percent of the questions on each knowledge test; and
( 2 ) Demonstrate that he/she can successfully perform all of the skills addressed in paragraph (a)(7) of this section.
( c ) *Automatic test failure.* Failure to obey traffic laws or involvement in a preventable crash during the skills portion of the test will result in automatic failure. Automatic test failure determinations are made at the sole discretion of the qualified LCV driver-instructor.
[69 FR 16732, Mar. 30, 2004, as amended at 83 FR 22874, May 17, 2018]
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0922. TERRY ANTHONY SARGENT v. OCTAVIA M. JOHNSONSARGENT

Terry Anthony Sargent (“Terry”) appeals from the Fulton County Superior

Court’s final judgment and decree of divorce. He argues that the trial court erred by

prematurely entering such judgment because his wife, Octavia Marquitta JohnsonSargent (“Octavia”), did not serve him with the complaint until after final judgment

was entered. The record shows that a certificate of service of the complaint was filed

by Octavia’s counsel, along with a blank summons issued by the clerk’s office. No

return of the summons was filed.

“The sufficiency of service is a question of fact for the trial court[.]” Exum v.

Melton, 244 Ga. App. 775, 778 (2) (b) (536 SE2d 786) (2000). Here, the divorce

decree was already entered by the time that Terry claims he was served with the

complaint and summons. Accordingly, the trial court was not afforded an opportunity

to rule on this issue. We therefore remand for the trial court to make a determination

regarding the sufficiency of service of the complaint. Compare Elmore v. Elmore,

177 Ga. App. 682, 682 (2) (340 SE2d 651) (1986) (where no summons was issued,

“defendant’s insufficiency of service of process defense [raised below] should have 

October 29, 2019
been sustained.”).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/29/2019
## State of N ew York Su p reme C ou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment -1-

Decided and Entered: November 5, 2015 D -72-15

In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a.
COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STANDARDS, ON MOTION Petitioner; TOVA WEISS, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 3906252)
Calendar Date: June 22, 2015 Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Lynch, JJ.

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner. Tova Weiss, Southhampton, Pennsylvania, respondent pro se.

Per Curiam. Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 2000, was suspended by this Court's order dated January 30, 2014 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (113 AD3d 1020 [2014]). Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object- 2 - D-72-15 to respondent's application. Respondent's application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately. Lahtinen, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Lynch, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
###### Editorial Note on Part 365

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 365 appear at 66 FR 49870, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 365.119 Opposed applications.

If the application is opposed, opposing parties are required to send a copy of their protest to the applicant and to FMCSA. All protests must include statements made under oath (verified statements). There are no personal appearances or formal hearings.

[80 FR 63705, Oct. 21, 2015]

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 82 FR 5300, Jan. 17, 2017, § 365.119 was suspended, effective Jan. 14, 2017.
#### Hannah C. Spencer, Respondent, *v.*Order of the Golden Seal, Appellant.

*Spencer*v. *Order of the Golden*Seal, 145 App. Div. —, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted May 29, 1911;

decided June 6, 1911.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 10,1911, which affirmed a judgment of the Chemung County Court affirming a judgment of the City Court of Elmira in favor of plaintiff.

The motion was made upon the grounds that the action was commenced in a court of inferior jurisdiction, was. *585therefore, not appealable of right to the Court of Appeals and that permission to appeal had not been obtained.

*Thomas M. Losie*for motion.

No one opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs, and ten dollars costs of motion.
§ 31.38 Reconsideration of initial decision. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, any party may file a motion for reconsideration of the initial decision within 20 days of receipt of the initial decision. If service was made by mail, receipt will be presumed to be five days from the date of mailing in the absence of contrary proof.
( b ) Every such motion must set forth the matters claimed to have been erroneously decided and the nature of the alleged errors. Such motion shall be accompanied by a supporting brief.
( c ) Responses to such motions shall be allowed only upon request of the ALJ.
( d ) No party may file a motion for reconsideration of an initial decision that has been revised in response to a previous motion for reconsideration.
( e ) The ALJ may dispose of a motion for reconsideration by denying it or by issuing a revised initial decision.
( f ) If the ALJ denies a motion for reconsideration, the initial decision shall constitute the final decision of the authority head and shall be final and binding on the parties 30 days after the ALJ denies the motion, unless the initial decision is timely appealed to the authority head in accordance with § 31.39.
( g ) If the ALJ issues a revised initial decision, that decision shall constitute the final decision of the authority head and shall be final and binding on the parties 30 days after it is issued, unless it is timely appealed to the authority head in accordance with § 31.39.
Supplement to Appendix 3-B: General Land Cover Classes Derived from the Cropland Data Layer (CDL) 

The Cropland Data Layers for CA were downloaded from the USDA Geospatial Data Gateway (http://datagateway.

The metadata for the CDL were included in the downloads. Metadata are also available through http://www.nass.us

Data accessed October, 2010

Crops256 - Matrix and All 256 - Table come from the USDA NASS metadata for the 2010 CDL in California.

The cdl2010Matrix_CA worksheet was created from the metadata tables, adding crop groupings for analysis of the 

These results were further manipulated and summarized to create the summary tables in Appendix B.
nrcs.usda.gov/). 

sda.gov/research/Cropland/metadata/meta.htm.

proposed groupings.