alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 31.45 Deposit in Treasury of United States.

All amounts collected pursuant to this part shall be deposited as miscellaneous receipts in the Treasury of the United States, except as provided in 31 U.S.C. 3806(g).
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of RegeneRx (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J.J. Finkelstein, Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in thisreport.

 

 

 

 

| Date:  November  14, 2007 |   |                    |
|--------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                           |   |                    |
|                           |   | /s/J.J. Finkelstein     |
|                           |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----
1210-AB32-2-1358.html[7/26/2015 2:20:37 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvz-m5qk

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1854

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Gentlemen:

My wife and I are 73 years old. Very simply, we do not any additional regulations regarding our investment

 accounts. We have managed them ourselves for decades and have never been misled or misinformed, unless it

 would be by the rules promulgated by the IRS and other similar groups.

Very simply, we don't need or want your help in this matter.

John & Sandy Mandeville

Fort Mill, SC
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

NATHANIEL STEPHENS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1570

[January 18, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventh Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Usan, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 05-16675 CF10A.

Nathaniel Stephens, Raiford, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., TAYLOR and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Summary of Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Summary of Director Compensation 
 Effective March 24, 2006, the Board of Directors approved the
following compensation program for non-employee directors, based on reports prepared by an independent compensation consultant, which reports include information on current director compensation data for companies of similar scope and scale in our
industry: 
  

										
	 	  	Annual
Retainer Fee	  	Per in-person
meeting	  	Per telephonic
meeting
	 Board Meetings
	  			  			  		
	 Vice Chairman of the Board and Lead Independent Director
	  	$	51,000	  	$	2,500	  	$	1,250
	 Directors
	  	 	36,000	  	 	1,500	  	 	750
	 Audit Committee Meetings
	  			  			  		
	 Committee Chair
	  	$	10,000	  	$	2,000	  	$	1,000
	 Committee Members
	  	 	—  	  	 	1,500	  	 	1,000
	 Other Committee Meetings
	  			  			  		
	 Committee Chair
	  	$	5,000	  	$	1,000	  	$	650
	 Committee Members
	  	 	—  	  	 	1,000	  	 	650

 Patrick J. Sullivan and Daniel J. Levangie, employee directors of our company, do not receive any
compensation for services rendered as a director. 
 Our non-employee directors are also eligible to participate in our 2004 Omnibus Stock
Plan. Under the 2004 Omnibus Stock Plan, each non-employee director may be granted stock options and opportunities to make direct purchases of stock and other equity interests in our company. 
 The Board of Directors has currently approved an annual option grant to purchase up to 16,000 shares of common stock, which vests in one-twelfth
increments on the first day of each calendar quarter for three years. Also, upon commencement of service as a director, each new non-employee director receives an option to purchase the same number of shares of common stock as the annual option
grant in effect at that time. Each non-employee director is entitled, under our Amended and Restated Director Compensation Method Plan, to receive payment of the annual retainer fees for any calendar year either in cash or in shares of our common
stock. Each non-employee director is also entitled to receive an annual stock award of 1,000 shares of our common stock, which is earned monthly based on service. Lastly, each non-employee director is paid a cash fee for every meeting attended as
set forth above. Each non-employee director may elect to defer for tax purposes the payment of the annual retainer, annual stock award and meeting attendance fees.
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |

|                                                                                      |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                      |  |
| /s/ Kenneth D. Gibbons                                                               |   |
| Kenneth D. GibbonsPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |   |
Exhibit 21.1

As of December 31, 2007, the Company had the following active subsidiaries:



|                                                                  |  |                       
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Comprehensive Care Corporation:      |  | State of Incorporation
|Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.                               |  | Nevada                
|                                                                  | 
|Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.: |  |                       
|Comprehensive Care Integration, Inc.                              |  | Delaware              
|Comprehensive Behavioral Care of Connecticut, Inc.                |  | Florida               
|Healthcare Management Services, Inc.                              |  | Michigan              
|CompCare of Pennsylvania, Inc.                                    |  | Nevada                
|                                                                  | 
|Affiliates sponsored by Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.:      |  |                       
|Comprehensive Provider Networks of Texas, Inc.                    |  | Texas
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
EnergyNorth, Inc. condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 1998 and
condensed consolidated statement of income and statement of cash flows for the
six months ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      101,494<F1>
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      7,487<F2>
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          30,115
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        11,338
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,434
<COMMON>                                         3,246
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       30,488
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             21,950
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  55,684
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            44,815
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               1,600
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      939
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  47,396
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  150,434
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       72,924
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             5,852
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      55,613
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      61,465
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         11,459
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 849
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  12,308
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,330
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,978
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    9,978
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         2,078
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,600<F3>
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          13,460
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $3.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Net of accumulated depreciation of $50,088
<F2>Net of accumulated depreciation of $ 9,875
<F3>$3,600 represents the forecasted annual interest on bonds for the fiscal year
ending September 30, 1998.  Actual interest on bonds for the six months ended
March 31, 1998 was $1,804.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
The State of /s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 6, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00204

- CR

Robert RODRIGUEZ

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 274th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 0979

- CR

- A Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant ’ s brief was due July 22, 2015 , but was not filed. The clerk of this court notified appellant ’ s counsel

, Susan Lee Schoon, of the deficiency by letter date d July 24, 2015

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2). The letter required appellant to respond in writing within ten days, explaining why the brief has not been filed and demonstrating that counsel has taken affirmative steps to prepare and file the brief. The letter further advised counsel that if an adequa te response was not timely filed, the court would abate the appeal for an abandonment hearing in the trial court. We have received no response.

Therefore, pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellant Procedure, we

ORDER this appeal abated , remand the case to the trial court, and ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine (1) whether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal

, and (2) whether counsel has abandoned the appeal. Id. Because appellant is indigent, the trial court must take steps to ensure effective assistance of counsel, including the appointment of new counsel if necessary.

The trial court may, in its discretion, receive evidence on the first issue by sworn affidavit from the appellant. The trial court shall, h owever, order appellant ’ s counsel to be present at the hearing.We further ORDER t he trial court to make written findings and conclusions on these

issues within thirty days of the date of this order

. We ORDER the court reporter and the district

clerk to file in this court, on or before September 21, 2015 , (1) a reporter ’ s record of the hearing, and (2) a supplemental clerk ’ s record containing the court ’ s written findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations addressing the above issues. See id. R. 38.8(b)(3).

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the trial court, the district clerk, the court reporter, and all co unsel.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of t he said

court on this 6th day of August, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
1210-AB32-2-1542.html[7/26/2015 7:20:44 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 11, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jx0-d8mc

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2039

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Hugo Ortega

Address:

38 Atlantic Street

Carteret, NJ, 07008

Email: hm516.ortega@gmail.com

General Comment

IRA's and 401K's are for individuals to put their own money away for retirement. I have been on top of this issue

 since I was 

32 years old, I am now 64 years old and I believe I have made the right choices for my retirement when the time

 comes.

I do not need my government managing my financial affairs. They have been good enough to sock money away

 for me in my

social security account by using the social security tax. That is good enough for me. My financial affairs are my

 own business.

I know I will be taxed when I start to withdraw funds from those accounts. That is OK by me. In the meantime,

 please keep 

the governments hands out of my 401K and IRA accounts.

Respectfully yours,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statement of income and consolidated balance sheet and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000021212
<NAME> COACHMEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                      <C>             
<PERIOD-TYPE>            YEAR            
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        DEC-31-1998     
<PERIOD-END>             DEC-31-1998     
<CASH>                        23,010     
<SECURITIES>                  31,279     
<RECEIVABLES>                 33,932     
<ALLOWANCES>                     768     
<INVENTORY>                   93,349     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             185,411     
<PP&E>                       104,517     
<DEPRECIATION>                41,445     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               268,476     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         45,718     
<BONDS>                       10,191     
<COMMON>                      55,977     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0     
<PREFERRED>                        0     
<OTHER-SE>                   149,480     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 268,476     
<SALES>                      756,030     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             756,030     
<CGS>                        646,119     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                710,102     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              (4,363)     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                (175)    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             1,739     
<INCOME-PRETAX>               50,291     
<INCOME-TAX>                  17,228     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           33,063
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                  33,063
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   1.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                   1.92
        

</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEnvironmental Data Recorder (EDR) qualificationQualification testing of the environmental data recorder (EDR) was successfully completed. The purpose of this test was to qualify the EDR so that it could monitor segments shipped via railcar from Utah to Kennedy Space Center (KSC). The tests consisted of a transportation and a functional test. The transportation test verified EDR operation in its intended environment. The functional test verified EDR accuracy. Data from the functional test showed that the EDR accuracies complied with requirements. Since the EDR meets or exceeds all of its test objectives, it was successfully qualified. It is recommended that the EDR replace the transportation monitoring unit (TMU). A description of the qualification procedure is presented.Document ID19910009093Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsDanforth, Richard A.*(Thiokol Corp. Brigham City, UT, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 15, 1991Subject CategoryInstrumentation And PhotographyReport/Patent NumberPUBL-910960NASA-CR-184108TWR-60248NAS 1.26:184108Accession Number91N18406Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-30490Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910009093.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Editorial Note on Part 393
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 393.45 Brake tubing and hoses; hose assemblies and end fittings. ( a ) *General construction requirements for tubing and hoses, assemblies, and end fittings.* All brake tubing and hoses, brake hose assemblies, and brake hose end fittings must meet the applicable requirements of FMVSS No. 106 (49 CFR 571.106).
( b ) *Brake tubing and hose installation.* Brake tubing and hose must— ( 1 ) Be long and flexible enough to accommodate without damage all normal motions of the parts to which it is attached;
( 2 ) Be secured against chaffing, kinking, or other mechanical damage; and
( 3 ) Be installed in a manner that prevents it from contacting the vehicle's exhaust system or any other source of high temperatures.
( c ) *Nonmetallic brake tubing.* Coiled nonmetallic brake tubing may be used for connections between towed and towing motor vehicles or between the frame of a towed vehicle and the unsprung subframe of an adjustable axle of the motor vehicle if— ( 1 ) The coiled tubing has a straight segment (pigtail) at each end that is at least 51 mm (2 inches) in length and is encased in a spring guard or similar device which prevents the tubing from kinking at the fitting at which it is attached to the vehicle; and
( 2 ) The spring guard or similar device has at least 51 mm (2 inches) of closed coils or similar surface at its interface with the fitting and extends at least 38 mm (11 ⁄ 2 inches) into the coiled segment of the tubing from its straight segment.
( d ) *Brake tubing and hose connections.* All connections for air, vacuum, or hydraulic braking systems shall be installed so as to ensure an attachment free of leaks, constrictions or other conditions which would adversely affect the performance of the brake system.
[70 FR 48050, Aug. 15, 2005]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         142,182
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             309
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    247,898
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         656,421
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           642,372
<LOANS>                                      1,666,848
<ALLOWANCE>                                     26,714
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,974,331
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,072,114
<SHORT-TERM>                                   398,363
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             43,156
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       460,698
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,974,331
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 40,845
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               14,992
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   254
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                56,091
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,346
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,587
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           36,504
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              (1,515)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 28,639
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,586
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      22,586
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,452
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                      8,493
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,468
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 59,405
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                27,565
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,094
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,043
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               26,714
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            10,258
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         16,456


</TABLE>