alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyi-8tf6

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2194

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Sheila Hostetler

General Comment

I work with Primerica and our focus is helping middle American families. 

What you are proposing would not help but would hurt American families. 

I urge you to please reconsider and put yourselves in their place.
-----Original Message----- 

From: chroostik@yahoo.com [mailto:chroostik@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:24 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Maria Odezynskyj 

455 A Haight Ave 

Alameda, CA 94501
1210-AB32-2-1142.html[7/24/2015 6:36:45 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-e6k5

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1636

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Scott Jones

General Comment

I can can manage my own retirement. Thank you very much!!
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 174 (Monday, September 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 51657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4413]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


30-Day Notice of Submission of Study Package to the Office of 
Management and Budget; Opportunity for Public Comment (OMB 
<greek-i>1024-xxxx, ``2007 National Park Service Comprehensive Survey 
of the American Public'')

AGENCY: Department of the Interior, National Park Service.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
and 5 CFR Part 1320, Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements, the 
National Park Service (NPS) invites public comments on a proposed new 
collection of information (OMB<greek-i> 1024-xxxx). The 30-Day Federal 
Register Notice for this collection of information was published on 
August 28, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 166, Pages 49303-49305). There are a 
few corrections that need to be added to the previous publication of 
this Federal Register Notice. Under the heading Estimated average 
number of respondents, the words that should be added at the end are 
``and 4750 non-respondents''. Under the heading Estimated average 
number of responses, the answer should be: 8,794 responses (4,044 
respondents and 4,750 non-respondents). Under the heading Estimated 
average time burden per respondent, the information that should be 
added should read ``Non-respondents: 1 minute/respondent''. Under the 
heading Estimated total annual reporting burden, the information should 
be 1,144 hours. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this 
matter, please contact Mr. Leonard E. Stowe, NPS, Information 
Collection Clearance Office, 1849 C St., NW., (2605), Washington, DC 
20240; or via fax at 202/371-1427; or via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#630f060c0d0211073c10170c1406230d13104d040c15"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="167a7379787764724965627961735678666538717960">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 30, 2007.
Leonard E. Stowe,
NPS, Information Collection Clearance Office.
[FR Doc. 07-4413 Filed 9-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, we the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, respectively of Communications Systems, Inc. (the Company)
hereby certify:

(1) That the
accompanying Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                      |  |                                             | 
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- | 
|                      |  | /s/ Jeffrey
 K. Berg                        | 
|                      |  |                                             | 
|                      |  | Jeffrey K.
 Berg                            | 
|Date: March
 15, 2011 |  | President
 and Chief Executive Officer     
|                      |  |                                             | 
|                      |  | /s/ David T.
 McGraw                        | 
|                      |  |                                             | 
|                      |  | David T.
 McGraw                            | 
|Date: March
 15, 2011 |  | Vice
 President and Chief Financial Officer

59

---
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 301 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 301

 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 4, 2001

Mr. Nussle submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following Member be, and is hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Transportation and Infrastructure: Mr. Boozman.
    Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Boozman.
                                 <all>
```
(June 26, 1913.)

#### PAYETTE HEIGHTS IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Respondent, v. R. E. HAYNES, Appellant.

[133 Pac. 907.]

APPEAL from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District for Canyon County. Hon. Ed. L. Bryan, Judge.

Action for confirmation of bond issue of an irrigation district. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant, a property owner, appealed.

*Affirmed.*

R. E. Haynes, *pro se,*as Appellant.

Thompson *&*Buckner, for Respondent.

W. C. Bicknell, of Counsel.

Counsel cite same authorities as in *Little Willow Irrigation District v. Haynes, ante,*p. 317.

AILSHIE, C. J.

This case involves the same question considered and passed upon in *Little Willow Irrigation District v. Haynes, ante,*p. 317, which has just been decided by this court. On the authority of that case, the judgment in this case must be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Costs awarded in favor of respondent.

Sullivan and Stewart, JJ., concur.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUI T

________________________ No. 16

- 17448 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:15

- cr - 60317

- BB

- 2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus DIANA LOVERA , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

____________________ ____ (July 28, 2017) Before MARCUS , JILL PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM : The Government ’ s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Lovera’ s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert , 997 F.2d 1343, 1350

- 51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced

Case: 16-17448 Date Filed: 07/28/2017 Page: 1 of 22 if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Bascomb , 451 F.3d 1292, 1297 (11th Cir. 2006) (appeal waiver “ cannot be vitiated or altered by comments the court makes during sentencing ” ); United States v. Grinard

- Henry , 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error). Case: 16-17448 Date Filed: 07/28/2017 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                     8,295
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                    64,934
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           1,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>               16,473
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                    23,275
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                      23,273
<LOANS>                                   71,474
<ALLOWANCE>                                1,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           106,822
<DEPOSITS>                                94,271
<SHORT-TERM>                               1,730
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          895
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   3,662
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           106,822
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            3,526
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            505
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             140
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           4,171
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         1,315
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,365
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      2,806
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                 47
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            2,512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              836
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 525
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.42
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                              6.16
<LOANS-NON>                                  359
<LOANS-PAST>                                 223
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             971
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 20
<RECOVERIES>                                   2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           1000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        1000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      414
        

</TABLE>
1210-AB32-2-1529.html[7/26/2015 6:52:12 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwp-6lr1

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2026

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Travis Anonymous

General Comment

For myself and other who have sacrificed, done without that night on the town, dinner at a nice restaurant, exotic

 vacation,

a new car and stress our personal belongings to the brink so in a responsible way we can put those funds aside in 

investments like mutual funds, IRA and 401K ETC. we do not need or want the Govt. stepping in anyway shape

 or form. 

Looking at the history of many Government programs and their failures in many programs such as Social

 Security proves the

point that we the people are far better off to know our unique needs and desires to make such planning on our

 own behalf. 

Looking at all the money we have paid into SSA and the knowledge that through the failed system by the Govt.

 That when I 

get to the age of retirement, SSA will be long depleted from congress misappropriating and re-distributing the

 funds put in, I

I will not have any benefits from that. If I can't expect or trust in you to fix the many programs you've broke then

 why should 

we expect you have any clue on our needs, wants and desires for Retirement. If you are looking for a project start

 by fixing 

the many broken programs currently in effect.
###### Editorial Note on Part 385

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 385.1015 Other orders unaffected; not exclusive remedy.

If a motor carrier subject to an order issued under this subpart is or becomes subject to any other order, prohibition, or requirement of the FMCSA, an order issued under this subpart is in addition to, and does not amend or supersede the other order, prohibition, or requirement. Nothing in this subpart precludes FMCSA from taking action against any motor carrier under 49 U.S.C. 13905 for other conduct amounting to willful failure to comply with an applicable statute, regulation or FMCSA order.
1210-AB32-2-1547.html[7/26/2015 7:20:42 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 11, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jx3-1b4f

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2044

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Thank you, but no thanks! I'm smart enough to plan for my own retirement,
Editorial Note on Part 387
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 387 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 387.413T Forms and procedures. ( a ) *Forms.* Endorsements for policies of insurance, surety bonds, certificates of insurance, applications to qualify as a self-insurer or for approval of other securities or agreements, and notices of cancellation must be in the form prescribed at subpart C of this part.
( b ) *Procedure.* Certificates of insurance, surety bonds, and notices of cancellation must be filed with the FMCSA.
( c ) *Names.* Certificates of insurance and surety bonds shall be issued in the full name (including any trade name) of the individual, partnership (all partners named), corporation, or other person holding or to be issued the permit.
( d ) *Cancellation.* Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, certificates of insurance, surety bonds, and other securities and agreements shall not be cancelled or withdrawn until 30 days after the FMCSA receives written notice from the insurance company, surety, freight forwarder, or other party, as the case may be.
( e ) *Termination by replacement.* Certificates of insurance or surety bonds may be replaced by other certificates of insurance, surety bonds, or other security, and the liability of the retiring insurer or surety shall be considered as having terminated as of the replacement's effective date, if acceptable to the FMCSA.
[82 FR 5310, Jan. 17, 2017, as amended at 83 FR 16226, Apr. 16, 2018; 84 FR 51434, Sept. 30, 2019]
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

FEB 20 2002

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

DARRICK JERMAINE LONDON,

also known as Darnell Wilson, also

known as Derick Winston, also known

as D-Loaded, also known as Marc

Robinson, also known as Daryl Smith,

also known as James Roberts, also

known as James Robinson, also known

as Darrell Johnson, also known as

James Wilson, also known as Darrell

Kinchen, also known as James Acklin,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-6058

(D.C. No. 00-CR-4-L)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA , Chief Judge, PORFILIO , Circuit Judge, and BRORBY ,

Senior Circuit Judge.
-2-

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral

argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

Defendant-appellant Derrick Jermaine London pled guilty to one count of

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute cocaine and

cocaine base (crack) in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Defendant was

sentenced to life imprisonment and, if released, to a term of five years supervised

release. Defendant now appeals his sentence.

The government has moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction, citing defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal in the plea

agreement. In the plea agreement, defendant agreed to waive his right to appeal

or collaterally challenge his “sentence as imposed by the Court and the manner in

which the sentence is determined, provided the sentence is within or below the

applicable guideline range determined by the Court to apply to this case . . . .” 

Appellant’s App. Vol. I at 47-48. Defendant specifically reserved the right to

appeal in the event the court departed upward. See id. at 48. Defendant’s

sentence, however, was within the applicable guideline range and no upward

departure was applied.
-3-

“This court will hold a defendant to the terms of a lawful plea agreement. 

A defendant’s knowing and voluntary waiver of the statutory right to appeal his

sentence is generally enforceable.” United States v. Atterberry, 144 F.3d 1299,

1300 (10th Cir. 1998) (citation and quotation omitted). Our review of the plea

agreement and the transcripts of the sentencing hearings reveals nothing to

suggest that defendant’s waiver was either unknowing or involuntary, or that

defendant was unaware of the consequences of his plea.

The appeal is DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court

Wade Brorby 

Senior Circuit Judge
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.251 What are the first steps in an alcohol confirmation test? As the BAT for an alcohol confirmation test, you must follow these steps to begin the confirmation test process: ( a ) You must carry out a requirement for a waiting period before the confirmation test, by taking the following steps: ( 1 ) You must ensure that the waiting period lasts at least 15 minutes, starting with the completion of the screening test. After the waiting period has elapsed, you should begin the confirmation test as soon as possible, but not more than 30 minutes after the completion of the screening test. ( i ) If the confirmation test is taking place at a different location from the screening test (see § 40.247(b)(3)) the time of transit between sites counts toward the waiting period if the STT or BAT who conducted the screening test provided the waiting period instructions.
( ii ) If you cannot verify, through review of the ATF, that waiting period instructions were provided, then you must carry out the waiting period requirement.
( iii ) You or another BAT or STT, or an employer representative, must observe the employee during the waiting period.
( 2 ) Concerning the waiting period, you must tell the employee: ( i ) Not to eat, drink, put anything (*e.g.,* cigarette, chewing gum) into his or her mouth, or belch;
( ii ) The reason for the waiting period (*i.e.,* to prevent an accumulation of mouth alcohol from leading to an artificially high reading);
( iii ) That following your instructions concerning the waiting period is to the employee's benefit; and
( iv ) That the confirmation test will be conducted at the end of the waiting period, even if the instructions have not been followed.
( 3 ) If you become aware that the employee has not followed the instructions, you must note this on the “Remarks” line of the ATF.
( b ) If you did not conduct the screening test for the employee, you must require positive identification of the employee, explain the confirmation procedures, and use a new ATF. You must note on the “Remarks” line of the ATF that a different BAT or STT conducted the screening test.
( c ) Complete Step 1 of the ATF.
( d ) Direct the employee to complete Step 2 on the ATF and sign the certification. If the employee refuses to sign this certification, you must document this refusal on the “Remarks” line of the ATF and immediately notify the DER. This is a refusal to test.
( e ) Even if more than 30 minutes have passed since the screening test result was obtained, you must begin the confirmation test procedures in § 40.253, not another screening test.
( f ) You must note on the “Remarks” line of the ATF the time that elapsed between the two events, and if the confirmation test could not begin within 30 minutes of the screening test, the reason why.
( g ) Beginning the confirmation test procedures after the 30 minutes have elapsed does not invalidate the screening or confirmation tests, but it may constitute a regulatory violation subject to DOT agency sanction.