alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.3





Consent of


Brown Armstrong


Accountancy Corporation





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-163442) on Form S-3 of Tri-Valley Corporation (the “Company”) of the reference to Brown Armstrong Accountancy Corporation, and the inclusion of our report dated March 26, 2010 in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, of the Company, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





We also consent to the reference to our firm under the captions "Experts" in the Prospectus, which is part of the Registration Statement.








Brown Armstrong


Accountancy Corporation





Bakersfield, California


March 26, 2010
Editorial Note on Part 386
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 386 appear at 65 FR 7755, Feb. 16, 2000, and 88 FR 80182, Nov. 17, 2023.

§ 386.64 Reconsideration. ( a ) Within 20 days following service of the Final Order, any party may petition the Agency Decisionmaker for reconsideration of the order. If a civil penalty was imposed, the filing of a petition for reconsideration stays the entire action, unless the Agency Decisionmaker orders otherwise.
( b ) In the event a Notice of Default and Final Order is issued by the Field Administrator as a result of the respondent's failure to reply in accordance with § 386.14(a), the only issue that will be considered upon reconsideration is whether a default has occurred under § 386.14(c). The Final Order may be vacated where a respondent can demonstrate excusable neglect, a meritorious defense, or due diligence in seeking relief.
( c ) Either party may serve an answer to a petition for reconsideration within 30 days of the service date of the petition.
( d ) Following the close of the 30-day period, the Agency Decisionmaker will rule on the petition.
( e ) The ruling on the petition will be the Final Agency Order. A petition for reconsideration of the Agency Decisionmaker's ruling will not be permitted.
[70 FR 28485, May 18, 2005, as amended at 88 FR 80183, Nov. 17, 2023; 89 FR 713, Jan. 5, 2024]
Editorial Note on Part 395
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 395 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 395.28 Special driving categories; other driving statuses. ( a ) *Special driving categories* — ( 1 ) *Motor carrier options.* A motor carrier may configure an ELD to authorize a driver to indicate that the driver is operating a commercial motor vehicle under any of the following special driving categories: ( i ) Authorized personal use; and
( ii ) Yard moves.
( 2 ) *Driver's responsibilities.* A driver operating a commercial motor vehicle under one of the authorized categories listed in paragraph (a)(1) of this section: ( i ) Must select on the ELD the applicable special driving category before the start of the status and deselect when the indicated status ends; and
( ii ) When prompted by the ELD, annotate the driver's ELD record describing the driver's activity.
( b ) *Drivers exempt from ELD use.* A motor carrier may configure an ELD to designate a driver as exempt from ELD use.
( c ) *Other driving statuses.* A driver operating a commercial motor vehicle under any exception under § 390.3(f) of this subchapter or § 395.1 who is not covered under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section must annotate the driver's ELD record to explain the applicable exemption.
H. Res. 210

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 26, 2001.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2620) making appropriations for the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development and for sundry independent agencies, boards, commissions, corporations, and offices for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes. The first reading

of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against

consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be

confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general

debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the

five-minute rule. Points of order against provisions in the bill

for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived

except as follows: beginning with ‘‘, except that’’ on page 64,
2

•HRES 210 EH

line 12, through ‘‘drinking water contaminants’’ on line 17.

Where points of order are waived against part of a paragraph, points of order against a provision in another part of

such paragraph may be made only against such provision and

not against the entire paragraph. The amendment printed in

the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution may be offered only by a Member designated in the

report and only at the appropriate point in the reading of the

bill, shall be considered as read, shall not be subject to

amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division

of the question in the House or in the Committee of the

Whole. All points of order against the amendment printed in

the report are waived. During consideration of the bill for

amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole

may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the

Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed

in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for

that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. During consideration of the

bill, points of order against amendments for failure to comply

with clause 2(e) of rule XXI are waived. At the conclusion

of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee

shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall

be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto
3

•HRES 210 EH

to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RegeneRx (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Neil Lyons, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in this report.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2007



/s/ C. NEIL LYONSC. Neil LyonsChief Financial Officer
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–366 

RELATING TO CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (S. 1932) TO PROVIDE FOR 

RECONCILIATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 202(a) OF THE CONCURRENT 

RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006 (H. CON. RES. 95) 

JANUARY 31, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. PUTNAM, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 653] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 653, by a record vote of 7 to 4 with 1 Member voting 

present, report the same to the House with the recommendation 

that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides that the House hereby concurs in the 

Senate amendment to the House amendment to the bill (S. 1932) 

to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 202(a) of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2006 (H. Con. Res. 

95). 

COMMITTEE VOTES

Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House rule XIII the results of each 

record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together with 

the names of those voting for and against, are printed below: 

RULES COMMITTEE RECORD VOTE NO. 145

Date: January 31, 2006. 

Measure: Relating to consideration of the bill S. 1932, the Deficit 

Reduction Act of 2005. 

Motion by: Mr. Hastings of Washington. 

Summary of motion: To report the rule. 

Results: Agreed to 7 to 4, 1 present. 

Vote by Members: Hastings (WA)—Yea; Sessions—Yea; Putnam—Yea; Capito—Yea; Cole—Yea; Bishop—Present; Gingrey— 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with HEARING
2 

Yea; Slaughter—Nay; McGovern—Nay; Hastings (FL)—Nay; Matsui—Nay; Dreier—Yea. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with HEARING
§ 570.9 Tires. ( a ) *Tread depth.* The tread on each tire shall be not less than two thirty-seconds of an inch deep. ( 1 ) *Inspection procedure.* Passenger car tires have tread depth indicators that become exposed when tread depth is less than two thirty-seconds of an inch. Inspect for indicators in any two adjacent major grooves at three locations spaced approximately equally around the outside of the tire. For vehicles other than passenger cars, it may be necessary to measure tread depth with a tread gauge.
( b ) *Type.* Vehicle shall be equipped with tires on the same axle that are matched in tire size designation, construction, and profile. ( 1 ) *Inspection procedures.* Examine visually. A major mismatch in tire size designation, construction, and profile between tires on the same axle, or a major deviation from the size as recommended by the manufacturer (e.g., as indicated on the glove box placard on 1968 and later passenger cars) are causes for rejection.
( c ) *General condition.* Tires shall be free from chunking, bumps, knots, or bulges evidencing cord, ply, or tread separation from the casing or other adjacent materials. ( 1 ) *Inspection procedure.* Examine visually for conditions indicated.
( d ) *Damage.* Tire cords or belting materials shall not be exposed, either to the naked eye or when cuts or abrasions on the tire are probed. ( 1 ) *Inspection procedures.* Examine visually for conditions indicated, using a blunt instrument if necessary to probe cuts or abrasions.
[38 FR 23950, Sept. 5, 1973, as amended at 39 FR 12868, Apr. 9, 1974; 39 FR 19781, June 4, 1974]
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Mason N. Carter, Chief Executive Officer of Merrimac
Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending April
     2, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
     hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

/s/ Mason N. Carter
-------------------
Mason N. Carter
Chief Executive Officer
May 17, 2005
```
§ 511.23 Motions. ( a ) *Presentations and dispositions.* During the time a proceeding is before a Presiding Officer, all motions, whether oral or written, except those filed under § 511.42(e), shall be addressed to the Presiding Officer, who shall rule upon them promptly after affording an opportunity for response.
( b ) *Written motions.* All written motions shall state the particular order, ruling, or action desired and the grounds therefor. If a motion is supported by memoranda, affidavits or other documents, they shall be served and filed with the motion. All motions shall contain a proposed order setting forth the relief sought. All written motions shall be filed with the Executive Secretary and served on all parties, and all motions addressed to the Administrator shall be in writing.
( c ) *Responses.* Within ten (10) days after service of any written motion or petition or within such longer or shorter time as may be designated by these Rules or by the Presiding Officer or the Administrator, the opposing party or parties shall file a written response to such motion. Where a motion would affect only a single party, or an identifiable group of parties, the Presiding Officer or Administrator may limit the response to the motion to the affected party or parties. Failure to respond to a written motion may, in the discretion of the Presiding Officer be deemed as consent to the granting of the relief sought in the motion. The moving party shall have no right to reply, except as permitted by the Presiding Officer or the Administrator.
( d ) *Rulings on motions for dismissal.* When a motion to dismiss a complaint or motion for other relief is granted with the result that the proceeding before the Presiding Officer is terminated, the Presiding Officer shall issue an Initial Decision and Order thereon in accordance with the provisions of § 511.51. If such a motion is granted as to all issues alleged in the complaint in regard to some, but not all, of the respondents, or is granted as to any part of the allegations in regard to any or all of the respondents, the Presiding Officer shall enter an order on the record and consider the remaining issues in the Initial Decision. The Presiding Officer may elect to defer ruling on a motion to dismiss until the close of the case.
1210-AB32-2-1452.html[7/26/2015 5:23:28 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwe-284o

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1948

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Please stay out of my 401K. I believe we are smart enough to plan for our own retirement. So, please don't tell us

 how we should do it, or if we should use it!
Exhibit 24-1



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Edward A. Brennan do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange
Commission report on Form 10-K for 2004 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully
and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.

/S/    EDWARD A. BRENNANEdward A. Brennan




DATE:
February 23, 2005
1210-AB32-2-1173.html[7/24/2015 7:17:37 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvr-3lio

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1667

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: steve frantz

Address:

8611 ocean dr.

beach city, TX, 77523

Email: stevefrantz@teleshare.net

Phone: 281-383-2443

General Comment

Way too much regulation ! leave us the hell alone we are quite capable of taking care of ourselves . What

 happened to the land of the free ? Remember that we did not sign on for any stinking socialism ! Balance the

 budget, secure the borders ,do some real work that desperately needs doing ! Let retirement alone ........
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 27, 1995 (103), Para 103.13 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1208]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.103.13  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. STOKES:

       Page 22, after ``Secretary:'' on line 14, insert ``Provided 
     further, That if authorizing legislation is not enacted into 
     law by December 31, 1995, the amount provided for voucher 
     assistance may be reallocated by the Secretary to public 
     housing modernization, drug elimination grants, and section 8 
     incremental rental assistance:''

It was decided in the

Yeas

187

negative

Nays

237
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 15, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Todd B.
Barnum, the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Todd B. Barnum
--------------------------------------
Todd B. Barnum, Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer

June 22, 2005

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

                                                                              24
#### The Lucas Bank v. King, *Appellant.*

1. Partition: allowance of attorney’s fees. Under the act of 1870 ' in relation to attorney’s fees in partition cases, (Sess. Acts, p. 75,) the judge of the trial court has no right to allow a fee in favor of - the attorney bringing the suit, unless the fee has been agreed upon between the attorney and the plaintiff, in which event* the judge may allow it if it seems to him reasonable, or unless there is a stipulation of record that the judge may fix the fee.

2. -: distribution. In making distribution of the fund arising from a sale in partition, all costs should first be deducted, and the sum remaining should be divided between the parties according to their respective rights.

*Appeal from, Franklin Circuit Court.*— Hon. A. J. Seat, Judge.

Reversed.

*Crews $ Booth*for appellant.

*L. F. Parker*for respondent.

*591Hough, J.

It was provided by tbe Revised Statutes-of 1855, page 1122, section 65, that the judge of the court in which any suit for partition was brought, should allow a reasonable attorney’s fee in favor of the attorney bringing the suit, which should be taxed and collected as other-cost?. Under this statute it was held by this court, in *Draper v. Draper,*29 Mo. 13, decided in 1859, that it must appear of record that the plaintiff in partition had agreed to pay the attorney a certain fee, in which event, the judge,, if he deemed the sum agreed upon reasonable, might allow the same, to be taxed as costs, or an agreement must be-entered of record that the judge should fix the amount of the fee. In 1861, section 65, *supra,*was repealed, and the-judge was authorized to fix and allow a reasonable attorney’s fee to be taxed as costs, whether any fee had been-agreed upon between the attorney and the parties or not. Acts 1860-61, p. 45. In the revision of 1865, it was provided that the judge should allow a reasonable attorney’s fee, in no case to exceed $100, whether any fee had been agreed upon or not. Gen. St., 616, § 55. In 1870, the legislature restored the law as it stood in the revision of 1855, and we are, therefore, as much bound by the interpretation previously put upon it by this court as if such, interpretation had been expressly made a part of the enactment. *Skouten v. Wood,*57 Mo. 380. In the case at bar an attorney’s fee was allowed by the judge to be taxed as costs, but as it does not appear of record that the plaintiff and the attorney bringing the suit had agreed upon any fee, and as there is no stipulation of recoi’d that the judge might fix. the fee, the judgment must be reversed.

Ip making distribution of the fund arising from the sale of the property, all costs of the proceeding should be first deducted, and the sum remaining should be divided between the parties according to their respective rights.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

The other judges concur.
#### § 390.9 State and local laws, effect on.

Except as otherwise specifically indicated, subchapter B of this chapter is not intended to preclude States or subdivisions thereof from establishing or enforcing State or local laws relating to safety, the compliance with which would not prevent full compliance with these regulations by the person subject thereto.