alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 25.300 Admission. ( a ) *General.* No person shall, on the basis of sex, be denied admission, or be subjected to discrimination in admission, by any recipient to which §§ 25.300 through §§ 25.310 apply, except as provided in §§ 25.225 and §§ 25.230.
( b ) *Specific prohibitions.* ( 1 ) In determining whether a person satisfies any policy or criterion for admission, or in making any offer of admission, a recipient to which §§ 25.300 through 25.310 apply shall not: ( i ) Give preference to one person over another on the basis of sex, by ranking applicants separately on such basis, or otherwise;
( ii ) Apply numerical limitations upon the number or proportion of persons of either sex who may be admitted; or
( iii ) Otherwise treat one individual differently from another on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) A recipient shall not administer or operate any test or other criterion for admission that has a disproportionately adverse effect on persons on the basis of sex unless the use of such test or criterion is shown to predict validly success in the education program or activity in question and alternative tests or criteria that do not have such a disproportionately adverse effect are shown to be unavailable.
( c ) *Prohibitions relating to marital or parental status.* In determining whether a person satisfies any policy or criterion for admission, or in making any offer of admission, a recipient to which §§ 25.300 through 25.310 apply: ( 1 ) Shall not apply any rule concerning the actual or potential parental, family, or marital status of a student or applicant that treats persons differently on the basis of sex;
( 2 ) Shall not discriminate against or exclude any person on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom, or establish or follow any rule or practice that so discriminates or excludes;
( 3 ) Subject to § 25.235(d), shall treat disabilities related to pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom in the same manner and under the same policies as any other temporary disability or physical condition; and
( 4 ) Shall not make pre-admission inquiry as to the marital status of an applicant for admission, including whether such applicant is “Miss” or “Mrs.” A recipient may make pre-admission inquiry as to the sex of an applicant for admission, but only if such inquiry is made equally of such applicants of both sexes and if the results of such inquiry are not used in connection with discrimination prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
§ 383.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to help reduce or prevent truck and bus accidents, fatalities, and injuries by requiring drivers to have a single commercial motor vehicle driver's license and by disqualifying drivers who operate commercial motor vehicles in an unsafe manner.
( b ) This part: ( 1 ) Prohibits a commercial motor vehicle driver from having more than one commercial motor vehicle driver's license;
( 2 ) Requires a driver to notify the driver's current employer and the driver's State of domicile of certain convictions;
( 3 ) Requires that a driver provide previous employment information when applying for employment as an operator of a commercial motor vehicle;
( 4 ) Prohibits an employer from allowing a person with a suspended license to operate a commercial motor vehicle;
( 5 ) Establishes periods of disqualification and penalties for those persons convicted of certain criminal and other offenses and serious traffic violations, or subject to any suspensions, revocations, or cancellations of certain driving privileges;
( 6 ) Establishes testing and licensing requirements for commercial motor vehicle operators;
( 7 ) Requires States to give knowledge and skills tests to all qualified applicants for commercial drivers' licenses which meet the Federal standard;
( 8 ) Sets forth commercial motor vehicle groups and endorsements;
( 9 ) Sets forth the knowledge and skills test requirements for the motor vehicle groups and endorsements;
( 10 ) Sets forth the Federal standards for procedures, methods, and minimum passing scores for States and others to use in testing and licensing commercial motor vehicle operators; and
( 11 ) Establishes requirements for the State issued commercial license documentation.
[52 FR 20587, June 1, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 27648, July 21, 1988; 54 FR 40787, Oct. 3, 1989]
Unassociated Document


    AMENDMENT
      NO. 1

    TO

    BURLINGTON
      RESOURCES INC.

    2005
      PERFORMANCE SHARE UNIT PLAN

     

     

    The
      Burlington Resources Inc. 2005 Performance Share Unit Plan (the “Plan”) is
      hereby amended as follows:

    1.    Section
      2.1(e) of the Plan is amended, effective as of the “Effective Time” as defined
      in that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 12, 2005
      by
      and among Burlington Resources Inc., ConocoPhillips and Cello Acquisition Corp.
      (the “Effective Time”), to read as follows:

     

    “(e) Common
      Stock.
      The
      common stock of the Company, par value $.01 per share, or other classes of
      shares or other securities as may be applicable pursuant to the provisions
      of
      Section 5.2 (except as provided in Section 7.3).”

     

    2.    Article
      7
      of the Plan is amended, effective as of the Effective Time, by adding the
      following new Section 7.3:

     

    “7.3
       Conversion
      of Company Stock Account.
      At the
“Effective Time” as defined in that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
      as of December 12, 2005 by and among the Company, ConocoPhillips and Cello
      Acquisition Corp., the Phantom Stock held in the Company Stock Account and
      all
      Performance Share Units shall be converted in accordance with said Agreement
      and
      Plan of Merger into phantom shares of common stock of ConocoPhillips, and
      thereafter the term “Common Stock” for purposes of this Plan shall mean common
      stock of ConocoPhillips.”

     

    3.    Section
      8.13 of the Plan is amended, effective as of January 1, 2005, to read as
      follows:

     

    “8.13
       Compliance
      with Code Section 409A.
      It is
      intended that this Plan comply with Section 409A of the Code and any
      regulations, guidance and transitional


    
      
         

         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    


    rules
      issued thereunder, and the Plan shall be interpreted and operated consistently
      with that intent. If the Compensation Committee shall determine, following
      the
      issuance of final regulations, that any provisions of this Plan do not comply
      with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, the Compensation Committee
      shall amend the Plan to the extent (and only to the extent) necessary (including
      retroactively) in order to preserve compliance with said Section 409A; provided,
      however, that any such amendment affecting amounts previously deferred under
      the
      Plan shall be made in a manner that preserves the economic value of such
      deferred amounts to the Participant.”

    
      
         

      

      
        -2-
#### § 271.221 Involvement of railroad employees process.

An RRP plan shall contain a description of the railroad's processes for involving railroad employees in the establishment and implementation of an RRP pursuant to § 271.113. If a railroad contracts out significant portions of its operations, the contractor and the contractor's employees performing the railroad's operations shall be considered employees for the purposes of this section.
1210-AB32-2-1544.html[7/26/2015 7:20:43 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 11, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jx1-i5o0

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2041

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Aaron Azevedo

Address:

532 Rancho Del Cerro

Fallbrook, CA, 92028

Email: aaronazevedo@yahoo.com

Phone: 760-828-2259

General Comment

Do not change anything. Leave my investments alone. The ONLY changes I would support are:

1. Remove all limits on my money that I earn, and then I contribute to my IRA. The government should have

 absolutely nothing to do with my investment choices. $5k a year is nothing and I don't even get a deduction for

 it anymore.

2. Remove all limits on my 401k. Again, money that I earn, and deposit in my 401k plan, the government

 currently sends it back to me with a nice note saying that I make too much money to be allowed to save tax free.

Screw you!

Stay out of my personal business.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 174 (Monday, September 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51643-51644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4390]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research Special Emphasis Panel, Review R25s.
    Date: October 4, 2007.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call).

[[Page 51644]]

    Contact Person: Sooyoun (Sonia) Kim, MS, 45 Center Dr., 4An 32B, 
Division of Extramural Research, National Inst. of Dental & 
Craniofacial Research, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 594-4827, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a616367794a676b63662464636e7824646362246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ce7e5e1ffcce1ede5e0a2e2e5e8fea2e2e5e4a2ebe3fa">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research Special Emphasis Panel, Review R21.
    Date: October 31, 2007.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sooyoun (Sonia) Kim, MS, 45 Center Dr., 4An 32B, 
Division of Extramural Research, National Inst. of Dental & 
Craniofacial Research, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 594-4827, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#02696b6f71426f636b6e2c6c6b66702c6c6b6a2c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d3b8babea093beb2babffdbdbab7a1fdbdbabbfdb4bca5">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 29, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-4390 Filed 9-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 538.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to specify one of the criteria in 49 U.S.C. chapter 329 “Automobile Fuel Economy” for identifying dual-fueled passenger automobiles that are manufactured in model years 1993 through 2019. The fuel economy of a qualifying vehicle is calculated in a special manner so as to encourage its production as a way of facilitating a manufacturer's compliance with the Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards set forth in part 531 of this chapter. The purpose is also to establish gallon equivalent measurements for gaseous fuels other than natural gas.

[75 FR 25728, May 7, 2010]
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-110-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6041

WILLIAM G. HARDEN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SCOTT BODIFORD, Administrator, in his official and 

individual capacity; JAMES M. DORRIETY, Administrator, in 

his official and individual capacity; CORPORAL CATHEY, 

Detention Officer, in her official and individual capacity; 

GREENVILLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; PAUL B. WICKENSIMER, 

Clerk of Court for Greenville County, in his official and 

individual capacity,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. 

(6:09-cv-02362-HFF-WMC)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 27, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William G. Harden, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., 

CHAPMAN, HARTER, & GROVES, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William G. Harden seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders dismissing certain defendants and denying Harden’s motion 

to amend. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 

545-46 (1949). The orders Harden seeks to appeal are neither 

final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We 

deny Harden’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
###### Editorial Note on Part 384

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 384 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 384.407 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1997 
<CASH>                                                  140 
<SECURITIES>                                              0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                        17,720 
<ALLOWANCES>                                            236 
<INVENTORY>                                               0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          0 
<PP&E>                                                    0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       20,464 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     0 
<BONDS>                                               9,755 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0 
<PREFERRED>                                               0 
<COMMON>                                                250 
<OTHER-SE>                                            2,433 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         20,464 
<SALES>                                                   0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      2,131 
<CGS>                                                     0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           428 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        163 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        114 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      937 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         488 
<INCOME-TAX>                                            178 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     310 
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0 
<CHANGES>                                                 0 
<NET-INCOME>                                            310 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          1.96 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          1.95 
                                               


</TABLE>
#### § 366.5 Blanket designations.

Where an association or corporation has filed with the FMCSA a list of process agents for each State and DC (blanket agent), motor carriers, brokers and freight forwarders may make the required designations by using the following statement:

I designate those persons named in the list of process agents on file with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

by

(name of association or corporation)

and any subsequently filed revisions thereof, for the States in which this carrier is or may be authorized to operate (or arrange) as an entity of motor vehicle transportation, including States traversed during such operations, except those States for which individual designations are named.

[80 FR 63706, Oct. 21, 2015]

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 82 FR 5303, Jan. 17, 2017, § 366.5 was suspended, effective Jan. 14, 2017.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0946.html[7/21/2015 6:42:18 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-sjam

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0946

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: LCDR William Patton, USN(ret)

General Comment

I oppose this proposed rule.

Our retirement planning is between my wife, me, an our financial planner. Govt interventions is not necessary or

 desired.

Thank You
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 284

Encouraging the people of the United States to support the Armed Forces

and civilian personnel who are engaged in the war on terrorism as

part of a united effort to be known as Operation Enduring Support.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 8, 2001

Mr. OTTER (for himself, Mr. PAUL, Mr. SIMMONS, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr. CRANE, Mr. HAYES, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. UDALL of

New Mexico, Mr. TANCREDO, Mrs. BONO, Mr. BROWN of South Carolina,

Mr. JENKINS, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr.

CONDIT, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. POMBO, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. CANNON, Mr.

PETERSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. WALDEN of Oregon, Mr.

HEFLEY, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr.

SCHAFFER, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, Mr. PENCE, Mr.

PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. HULSHOF, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. NORWOOD,

Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. GRUCCI, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. SKEEN, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. REHBERG, Mr. TRAFICANT, Mr. GIBBONS, Mr. SHERWOOD, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. HUNTER, Mr.

SCHROCK, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. SHADEGG, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. HANSEN, Mr. STUMP, Mr. KIRK, Mr. PLATTS,

and Mr. SIMPSON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Armed Services

RESOLUTION

Encouraging the people of the United States to support

the Armed Forces and civilian personnel who are engaged in the war on terrorism as part of a united effort

to be known as Operation Enduring Support.

Whereas in response to the terrorist attacks on the United

States on September 11, 2001, the United States is en-
2

•HRES 284 IH

gaged in Operation Enduring Freedom, which will require the men and women of the Armed Forces to engage

and defeat terrorists, and which will require both military

and civilian personnel to protect the Nation from further

attack; and

Whereas it is imperative that the Nation support the Armed

Forces and civilian personnel in such an effort: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) recognizes and commends the efforts of

3 State and local governments, and community, reli4 gious, and charitable organizations to support the

5 Armed Forces engaged in Operation Enduring Free6 dom, as well as civilian personnel who are also en7 gaged in the war on terrorism;

8 (2) encourages the people of the United States

9 to further support the Armed Forces and civilian

10 personnel through a united effort to be known as

11 Operation Enduring Support;

12 (3) encourages the people of the United States,

13 as part of Operation Enduring Support—

14 (A) to support the families of Armed

15 Forces personnel;

16 (B) to stage patriotic send-off and wel17 come-home rallies and parades; and
3

•HRES 284 IH

1 (C) to volunteer and contribute financial

2 assistance to the Red Cross, the United Way,

3 and other such organizations.

Æ
#### Theodore B. Gates, *Appellant, v.*Henry S. Young and others, Respondents.

Order staying examination reversed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Pratt, J.;

Dykman, J. not sitting.