alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.39

Table of Special Stock Options
------------------------------

During 2003, the Registrant granted to individuals that are not officers or
directors of the Registrant Special Stock Options in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit 10.33 for the following 280,000 nonqualified stock options in three
individual compensation arrangements that have not approved by security holders:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------- ------------- -------------- --------------- -------------- ----------------- ----------------------
Shares           Type of                      Exercise        Vesting
Granted***       Security      Grant Date     Price / Share   Start Date     Vesting Schedule  Total Exercise Price
---------------- ------------- -------------- --------------- -------------- ----------------- ----------------------
<C>              <C>           <C>            <C>             <C>            <C>               <C>
75,000           NSO           8/11/03        $0.50           --             Immediate         $37,500

---------------- ------------- -------------- --------------- -------------- ----------------- ----------------------
50,000           NSO           11/10/03       $0.80           --             Immediate         $40,000

---------------- ------------- -------------- --------------- -------------- ----------------- ----------------------
155,000          NSO           6/1/03         $0.30           3/1/03         1/24 of Shares    $46,500
                                                                             Granted per
                                                                             month
---------------- ------------- -------------- --------------- -------------- ----------------- ----------------------
</TABLE>

***Takes into account all previous stock splits.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.345 In what circumstances may a C/TPA act as an intermediary in the transmission of drug and alcohol testing information to employers? ( a ) As a C/TPA or other service agent, you may act as an intermediary in the transmission of drug and alcohol testing information in the circumstances specified in this section only if the employer chooses to have you do so. Each employer makes the decision about whether to receive some or all of this information from you, acting as an intermediary, rather than directly from the service agent who originates the information (*e.g.,* an MRO or BAT).
( b ) The specific provisions of this part concerning which you may act as an intermediary are listed in appendix H to this part. These are the only situations in which you may act as an intermediary. You are prohibited from doing so in all other situations.
( c ) In every case, you must ensure that, in transmitting information to employers, you meet all requirements (*e.g.,* concerning confidentiality and timing) that would apply if the service agent originating the information (*e.g.,* an MRO or collector) sent the information directly to the employer. For example, if you transmit drug testing results from MROs to DERs, you must transmit each drug test result to the DER in compliance with the MRO requirements set forth in § 40.167.
[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 88 FR 27650, May 2, 2023]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTIN MAGANA

- PARDO,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 71151

Agency No. A027

- 581

- 834

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an

Immigration Judge’s Decision

Submitted January 16, 2018 **

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Martin Magana

- Pardo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) d etermination under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.31(a) that he

did not have a reasonable fear of persecution or torture and thus is not entitled to

relief from his reinstated removal order. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** T he panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 22 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 71151

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence t he IJ’s factual findings.

Andrade

- Garcia v. Lynch , 828 F.3d 829, 833 (9th Cir. 2016). We deny the petition

for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Magana

- Pardo

failed to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of persecution on account of a

protected ground

. See Nagoulko v. INS , 333 F.3d 1016, 1018 (9th Cir. 2003)

(possibility of future persecution “too speculative”).

Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s determination that Magana

- Pardo

failed to demonstrate a reasonable po ssibility of torture by or with the consent or

acquiescence of the government of Mexico

. See Zheng v. Holder , 644 F.3d 829,

83 5

- 3 6 (9th Cir. 2011) ( fear of torture speculative ).

We reject Magana Pardo’s contention that the IJ failed to consider evidence.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2435 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2435

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 
  for the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals to 100 
                         percent of such costs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 1995

 Mrs. Kelly (for herself, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. 
Brownback, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Chrysler, Mr. Cox of California, Mr. Duncan, 
 Mr. Forbes, Mr. Fox of Pennsylvania, Mr. Funderburk, Mr. Hastings of 
 Florida, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Kennedy of Massachusetts, Mr. 
 LaTourette, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Longley, Mr. McIntosh, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. 
 Metcalf, Mrs. Meyers of Kansas, Ms. Molinari, Ms. Pryce, Mr. Salmon, 
 Mr. Souder, Mrs. Waldholtz, Mr. Ward, and Mr. Weller) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 
  for the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals to 100 
                         percent of such costs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Self-Employed Health Fairness Act of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS OF SELF-
              EMPLOYED INDIVIDUALS TO 100 PERCENT OF SUCH COSTS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 162(l) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rules for health insurance 
costs of self-employed individuals) is amended by striking ``30 
percent'' and inserting ``100 percent''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1994.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135974 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135974 

 COA: 271675 
 Wayne CC: 06-003040-01

CARLOS DURRELL SIMMONS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 11, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0519 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 27, 2008 

 Clerk
2005 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-27-2005

In Re: Desamour

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 05-1666

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: Desamour " (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 1119.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/1119
HPS-63 (March 2005) NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

NO. 05-1666

________________

IN RE: REYNOLDO DESAMOUR,

 Petitioner

____________________________________

On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus from the 

United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(Related to E.D. Pa. Crim. No. 89-cr-00389-6)

_____________________________________

Submitted Under Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

March 11, 2005

Before: CHIEF JUDGE SCIRICA, WEIS AND GARTH, CIRCUIT JUDGES 

 Filed: May 27, 2005

 

_______________________

 OPINION

_______________________

PER CURIAM.

Reynoldo Desamour has filed a mandamus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1651, seeking to compel the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to

rule on his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). It appears that the District

Court has recently entered an order disposing of his Rule 60 motion. Accordingly, the

petition for a writ of mandamus will be denied as moot. Desamour may, of course, 
2

challenge the District Court’s disposition of his Rule 60(b) motion by filing a timely

notice of appeal in accordance with the dictates of Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of

Appellate Procedure.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 19th meeting of the American Health Information Community Population Health and Clinical Care Connections Workgroup [formerly Biosurveillance Workgroup] in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

# DATES:

October 11, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. [Eastern time].

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​populaton/​.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup will continue its discussion on how to facilitate the flow of reliable health information among population health and clinical care systems necessary to protect and improve the public's health.

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​population/​pop_​instruct.html.*

      ( print page 52379)    
Dated: September 7, 2007.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 07-4502 Filed 9-12-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
Editorial Note on Part 365
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 365 appear at 66 FR 49870, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 365.113 Changing the request for authority or filing supplementary evidence after the application is filed. ( a ) Once the application is filed, the applicant may supplement evidence only with approval of the FMCSA.
( b ) Amendments to the application generally are not permitted, but in appropriate instances may be entertained at the discretion of the FMCSA.
From: tlfitzpatrick@sbcglobal.net [mailto:tlfitzpatrick@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 7:22 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Toni Fitzpatrick 

3139 King Street 

Berkeley, CA 94703
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>          SEP-30-1996

<CASH>                        2,509,950 
<SECURITIES>                       0    
<RECEIVABLES>                    91,136 
<ALLOWANCES>                       0    
<INVENTORY>                        0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              2,601,086 
<PP&E>                        9,415,943 
<DEPRECIATION>                  365,170 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               11,839,730 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,173,728 
<BONDS>                            0    
<COMMON>                           0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0    
<PREFERRED>                        0    
<OTHER-SE>                    6,769,440 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 11,839,730 
<SALES>                         867,808 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                946,561 
<CGS>                              0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   487,393 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                252,397 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                400,000 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (193,229)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (193,589)
<DISCONTINUED>                  423,000 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0    
<CHANGES>                          0    
<NET-INCOME>                    229,411 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      5.82 
<EPS-DILUTED>                      5.82 

        

</TABLE>
#### § 390.11 Motor carrier to require observance of driver regulations.

Whenever in part 325 of subchapter A or in this subchapter a duty is prescribed for a driver or a prohibition is imposed upon the driver, it shall be the duty of the motor carrier to require observance of such duty or prohibition. If the motor carrier is a driver, the driver shall likewise be bound.
1210-AB32-2-1343.html[7/26/2015 2:09:40 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvy-wv60

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1839

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: jake butikofer

Address:

158 E 3500 N

Rexburg, 83440

Email: jbutikofer@achievetoday.com

Phone: 801-371-0755

General Comment

Leave my money alone!
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1456.html[7/23/2015 11:19:30 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-k4i1

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1456

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Linda Burrows

Address:

1701 Sturbridge Drive

Sewickley, PA, 15143

Email: bogeymom@hotmail.com

Phone: 412-630-9128

General Comment

My husband and I worked hard for the money in our 401K account. We are very responsible and do not need any

 advice from a government agency to tell us how and when to spend our retirement money. Please keep your

 regulations off of private property. This country is looking more and more like George Orwell's 1984 scenario.

 We do not need any help from the government to live our lives...we can "pursue happiness" on our own terms.

 Thank You.
Exhibit 10.2



                             Summary of Compensation
                        Arrangements with Certain Persons

     The   Company's   executive   officers   and   Mr.   Scott   Gerardin,   an
employee-director,  do not have employment  agreements  with the Company.  Their
salaries as of February 28, 2006 were as follows:



                                            Tri City     Tri City     Tri City
          Name                Bankshares   Nat'l Bank  Capital Corp     Total
          ----                ----------   ----------  ------------     -----
     Henry Karbiner, Jr.       $ 70,000     $405,090     $  1,500     $476,590
     Ronald K. Puetz           $ 15,000     $279,000     $  1,000     $295,000
     Robert W. Orth            $ 10,000     $235,100                  $245,100
     Scott A. Wilson           $ 10,000     $227,300     $  1,000     $238,300
     Scott D. Gerardin         $  5,000     $140,000                  $145,000

In addition,  executive officers and Mr. Gerardin are eligible to participate in
the Company's bonus plan and 2003 Stock Purchase Plan.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0755.html[7/21/2015 11:43:14 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-lwim

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0755

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Terry J

General Comment

I am more than capable of managing my own money, without any government intrusions. 

Please respect the general consensus of the public, and stay away from our money, we the people do not need or

 want our elected officials trying to run every aspect of our lives, stay away from my bank account!

I have worked far too many years preparing for retirement, and increasing the value of my accounts.

Submitted with the hope that this will make a difference. 

Thank You.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1279.html[7/22/2015 9:42:32 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-f5ue

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1279

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Corey Kiper

Address:

Madisonville, LA, 70447

Phone: 337-257-4950

General Comment

Please get out of the business of worrying about my retirement; I can manage it myself. I don't need your help

 nor do I want you to limit my options.
Exhibit 32.2

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [SECTION]1350, as adopted pursuant to
[SECTION]906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of her
knowledge:  1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Union Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union
Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


/s/ Marsha A. Mongeon
____________________
Marsha A. Mongeon
Chief Financial Officer



November 12,  2004


<PAGE>  41
§ 382.707 Notice to drivers of entry, revision, removal, or release of information. ( a ) FMCSA must notify a driver when information concerning that driver has been added to, revised, or removed from the Clearinghouse.
( b ) FMCSA must notify a driver when information concerning that driver has been released from the Clearinghouse to an employer and specify the reason for the release.
( c ) Drivers will be notified by letter sent by U.S. Mail to the address on record with the State Driver Licensing Agency that issued the driver's commercial driver's license. Exception: A driver may provide the Clearinghouse with an alternative means or address for notification, including electronic mail.
#### § 270.301 General.

The system safety program and its implementation shall be assessed internally by the passenger rail operation and audited externally by FRA or FRA's designee.

[85 FR 12849, Mar. 4, 2020]