alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N. Y. SUPERIOR COURT.

#### John J. Corbett agt. Louis De Comeau.

*Examination of parties before*trial— *Code of Civil*Procedure, *sections*870 *ei*seq.— *by whom affidavit should be made—Action- for libel.*

The affidavit upon which an order for the examination of a defendant, at the instance of the plaintiff before trial, is made, need not be sworn to by such adverse party. It is sufficient if such affidavit be made by his attorney or a third party.

A witness appearing in response to an order for his examination, at the instance of his adversary before trial, cannot object to being sworn, for the reason (the action being for libel) that a party should not be examined for the purpose of compelling him to prove against himself the publication of a libel. The objection is prematurely taken.

Such an objection is the personal privilege of the witness, and can only be urged when a question having that tendency is addressed to him.

Under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure such examination is now a matter of right *{Following Ludevyig*agt. *Pariser ante*498).

*Special Term, March,*1878.

The defendant appearing in response to an order for his examination, at the instance of the plaintiff before trial, objects to being sworn for the reasons : 1. That the affidavit upon which the order was made is not the affidavit of the plaintiff, but of his attorney. 2¡ That the action is for libel, and that a party should not be examined for the purpose of compelling him to prove against himself the publication of a libel. 3. That a bill of discovery would not, under the former practice, have been sustained for such a purpose.

*Coudert Bros.,*for defendant.

*W. F. Severance,*for plaintiff:.

*507Sandford, J.

No provision of the Code relating to depositions require the affidavit upon which an order for the examination of a party to an action, at the instance of the adverse party before trial, to be sworn to by such adverse party personally. If the affidavit sets forth the requisite facts, and is presented to a judge of the court in which the action is pending, he must grant the order, whether the affidavit be made by the applicant, his attorney or a third party *(Dernan*agt. *VanZandt,*2 *J.*C., 69). I have held, in *Ludewig*agt. *Pariser (See ante*498), that the examination of a party to an action before trial, at the instance of an adverse party, under sections 870 *et seq.*of the Code of Civil Procedure, is a matter of right, and no longer rests in discretion. The objection that questions may be addressed to the witness under examination which, if answered, would tend to criminate him, is prematurely taken; such an objection is the personal privilege of the witness, and can only be urged when a question having that tendency is addressed to him. In such case his refusal to answer may be justified, but the possibility of being asked such a question affords no justification for refusing to be sworn. As the examination is now a matter of right, under the existing provisions of law, it is unnecessary to consider whether a bill of discovery could have been resorted to for the same purpose under the former practice. The defendant must be sworn.
#### § 382.605 Referral, evaluation, and treatment.

The requirements for referral, evaluation, and treatment must be performed in accordance with 49 CFR part 40, Subpart O.
(CNA LOGO)
    
    Exhibit 10.17
 333 South Wabash, 40-South, Chicago, IL 60604
    
    Stephen W. Lilienthal, CPCUChief Executive OfficerCNA Financial CorporationJune 18, 2007
    
    Telephone 312-822-2163Facsimile 312-822-1330Internet    stephen.lilienthal@cna.comThomas Pontarelli1326 Evergreen CourtGlenview, IL 60025
 Personal and Confidential




---



##### 



-2-
    
    June 18, 2007
     /s/ Steve Lilienthal
   ACCEPTED:
    
    /s/ Thomas Pontarelli
    
    6/19/07Thomas Pontarelli
    
    Date
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0612 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JONAH MICAH WARR,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 5, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 27 2023

03/27/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0612
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0600.html[7/21/2015 6:36:36 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-rodk

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0600

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Judith Poole

General Comment

NO MORE REGULATIONS!!! We have the brains and work ethic to earn it and save it, and we don't need a

 faceless bureaucrat 'helping' us, thank you. We are happy with things just the way they are.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1392.html[7/23/2015 6:35:52 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvn-a93p

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1392

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I don't need anybody helping me with my retirement! Please just leave it alone.
###### Editorial Note on Part 384

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 384 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 384.219 Third serious traffic violation.

The State must disqualify from operating a CMV for a period of not less than 120 days each person who, in a three-year period, is convicted, as defined in § 383.5 of this subchapter, in any State(s) or jurisdiction(s), of three serious traffic violations as specified in Table 2 to § 383.51. This disqualification period must be in addition to any other previous period of disqualification.

[67 FR 49762, July 31, 2002]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1006.html[7/22/2015 6:27:35 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-1pgo

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1006

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Please hear me, I am smart enough to plan for my own retirement. I do NOT need you interfering !!!
Editorial Note on Part 389
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 389 appear at 66 FR 49873, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 389.33 Processing of petition. ( a ) Unless the Administrator otherwise specifies, no public hearing, argument, or other proceeding is held directly on a petition before its disposition under this section.
( b ) *Grants.* If the Administrator determines that the petition contains adequate justification, he/she initiates rule making action under this Subpart B.
( c ) *Denials.* If the Administrator determines that the petition does not justify rule making, he/she denies the petition.
( d ) *Notification.* Whenever the Administrator determines that a petition should be granted or denied, the Office of the Chief Counsel prepares a notice of that grant or denial for issuance to the petitioner, and the Administrator issues it to the petitioner.
[35 FR 9209, June 12, 1970, as amended at 53 FR 2036, Jan. 26, 1988]
§ 38.87 Public information system. ( a ) Each vehicle shall be equipped with an interior public address system permitting transportation system personnel, or recorded or digitized human speech messages, to announce stations and provide other passenger information. Alternative systems or devices which provide equivalent access are also permitted.
( b ) [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 116 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          May 15, 2001.
Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and 
        enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance and dedication of law 
        enforcement personnel;
Whereas more than 700,000 law enforcement officers, both men and women, at great 
        risk to their personal safety, serve their fellow citizens as guardians 
        of peace;
Whereas these peace officers are on the front line in preserving the right of 
        the children of the United States to receive an education in a crime-
        free environment, a right that is all too often threatened by the 
        insidious fear caused by violence in schools;
Whereas 151 peace officers lost their lives in the line of duty in 2000, and a 
        total of nearly 15,000 men and women serving as peace officers have made 
        that supreme sacrifice;
Whereas every year, 1 in 9 peace officers is assaulted, 1 in 25 is injured, and 
        1 in 4,400 is killed in the line of duty; and
Whereas on May 15, 2001, more than 15,000 peace officers are expected to gather 
        in the Nation's Capital to join with the families of their recently 
        fallen comrades to honor those comrades and all others who went before 
        them: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that--
            (1) all peace officers slain in the line of duty should be honored 
        and recognized; and
            (2) the President should issue a proclamation calling upon the 
        people of the United States to honor and recognize such officers with 
        appropriate ceremonies and respect.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 392.66 Carbon monoxide; use of commercial motor vehicle when detected. ( a ) No person shall dispatch or drive any commercial motor vehicle or permit any passengers thereon, when the following conditions are known to exist, until such conditions have been remedied or repaired: ( 1 ) Where an occupant has been affected by carbon monoxide;
( 2 ) Where carbon monoxide has been detected in the interior of the commercial motor vehicle;
( 3 ) When a mechanical condition of the commercial motor vehicle is discovered which would be likely to produce a hazard to the occupants by reason of carbon monoxide.
( b ) [Reserved]
[60 FR 38747, July 28, 1995]
###### Editorial Note on Part 393

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 393.30 Battery installation.

Every storage battery on every vehicle, unless located in the engine compartment, shall be covered by a fixed part of the motor vehicle or protected by a removable cover or enclosure. Removable covers or enclosures shall be substantial and shall be securely latched or fastened. The storage battery compartment and adjacent metal parts which might corrode by reason of battery leakage shall be painted or coated with an acid-resisting paint or coating and shall have openings to provide ample battery ventilation and drainage. Wherever the cable to the starting motor passes through a metal compartment, the cable shall be protected against grounding by an acid and waterproof insulating bushing. Wherever a battery and a fuel tank are both placed under the driver's seat, they shall be partitioned from each other, and each compartment shall be provided with an independent cover, ventilation, and drainage.
From: kish36@lycos.com [mailto:kish36@lycos.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:12 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

William Alexander 

74 Marlick Avenue 

Reedsville, PA 17084
§ 242.9 Waivers. ( a ) A person subject to a requirement of this part may petition the Administrator for a waiver of compliance with such requirement. The filing of such a petition does not affect that person's responsibility for compliance with that requirement while the petition is being considered.
( b ) Each petition for a waiver under this section must be filed in the manner and contain the information required by part 211 of this chapter.
( c ) If the Administrator finds that a waiver of compliance is in the public interest and is consistent with railroad safety, the Administrator may grant the waiver subject to any conditions the Administrator deems necessary.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of his knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Union Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


|                                           | 
|------------------------------------------ | 
|/s/ Kenneth D. Gibbons                     | 
|Kenneth D. Gibbons
Chief Executive Officer | 

May 14, 2010
1210-AB32-2-1059.html[7/23/2015 3:26:37 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-xyrt

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1551

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Vickie Anonymous

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan for my retirement.

Thank you!
#### § 371.13 Accounting.

Each broker who engages in any other business shall maintain accounts so that the revenues and expenses relating to the brokerage portion of its business are segregated from its other activities. Expenses that are common shall be allocated on an equitable basis; however, the broker must be prepared to explain the basis for the allocation.

[45 FR 68943, Oct. 17, 1980]
1210-AB32-2-1501.html[7/26/2015 6:22:16 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwk-z3gh

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1997

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Kevin Mayback

General Comment

Leave my retirement alone!
§ 37.145 State comment on plans. Each state required to receive plans under § 37.135 of this part shall: ( a ) Ensure that all applicable recipients of funding under 49 U.S.C. 5307 or 49 U.S.C. 5311 have submitted plans.
( b ) Certify to FTA that all plans have been received.
( c ) Forward the required certification with comments on each plan to FTA. The plans, with comments, shall be submitted to FTA no later than April 1, 1992, for the first year and April 1 annually thereafter.
( d ) The State shall develop comments to on each plan, responding to the following points: ( 1 ) Was the plan filed on time?
( 2 ) Does the plan appear reasonable?
( 3 ) Are there circumstances that bear on the ability of the grantee to carry out the plan as represented? If yes, please elaborate.
( 4 ) Is the plan consistent with statewide planning activities?
( 5 ) Are the necessary anticipated financial and capital resources identified in the plan accurately estimated?
[56 FR 45621, Sept. 6, 1991, as amended at 79 FR 21406, Apr. 16, 2014]
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

#### § 40.5 Who issues authoritative interpretations of this regulation?

ODAPC and the DOT Office of General Counsel (OGC) provide written interpretations of the provisions of this part. These written DOT interpretations are the only official and authoritative interpretations concerning the provisions of this part. DOT agencies may incorporate ODAPC/OGC interpretations in written guidance they issue concerning drug and alcohol testing matters. Only Part 40 interpretations issued after August 1, 2001, are considered valid.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1997 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,623
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,338
<ALLOWANCES>                                       150
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,112
<PP&E>                                           2,952
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,138
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,871
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,253
<OTHER-SE>                                    (31,409)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,959
<SALES>                                            242
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   713
<CGS>                                            1,318
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,994)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,994)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,994)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)
        

</TABLE>
§ 33.53 Types of allocation orders. There are three types of allocation orders available for communicating allocation actions. These are: ( a ) Set-aside: An official action that requires a person to reserve materials, services, or facilities capacity in anticipation of the receipt of rated orders;
( b ) Directive: An official action that requires a person to take or refrain from taking certain actions in accordance with its provisions. For example, a directive can require a person to: stop or reduce production of an item; prohibit the use of selected materials, services, or facilities; or divert the use of materials, services, or facilities from one purpose to another; and
( c ) Allotment: An official action that specifies the maximum quantity of a material, service, or facility authorized for a specific use.
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.919 Penalties. ( a ) Any motor carrier that the Agency determines engages or has engaged in a pattern or practice of avoiding regulatory compliance or masking noncompliance or violates an order issued under this subpart shall be subject to the civil or criminal penalty provisions of 49 U.S.C. 521(b) and applicable regulations.
( b ) Any motor carrier who permits the exercise of controlling influence over its operations by any person that the Agency determines, under this subpart, engages in or has engaged in a pattern or practice of avoiding regulatory compliance or masking noncompliance while acting on behalf of any motor carrier, shall be subject to the civil or criminal penalty provisions of 49 U.S.C. 521(b) and applicable regulations.