alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0102 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Deborah Beck 

Address: 

3820 Club Drive 

Harrisburg, PA, 17110 

Email: dasdbeck@hotmail.com 

Phone: 717-652-9128 

Organization: Drug and Alcohol Service Providers Organization of Pennsylvania 

General Comment 

by Email 

Alan D. Lebowitz, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Program Operations 

Office of Health Plan Standards and Compliance 

Assistance, Employee Benefits Security Administration 

Room N-5653 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20210 

Attention: MHPAEA Comments 

Dear Alan Lebowitz, 

Please accept the following comments from the Drug and Alcohol Service 

Providers Organization of Pennsylvania to the Request for Information regarding 

the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity 

Act of 2008. 

Throughout the multi-year debate over Federal Parity legislation, we argued 

that any such legislation must preserve existing state insurance laws that provide 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 26, 2009 

Received: May 26, 2009 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 809b6276 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web
treatment for alcohol and other drug addiction where such laws are more favorable 

to the insured. 

In the attached response to the Request for Information, our attorney Greg 

Heller provides an analysis and review of the legislative history of the debate over 

this issue and its resolution so clearly preserving more favorable state laws. 

We respectfully request that any regulation prepared as part of this process 

fully respects the preservation of state laws and does nothing to undermine this 

important decision by Congress. 

Sincerely, 

Deb Beck 

President/DASPOP 

May 25, 2009 

Attachments 

EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0102.1: Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629
IV

Calendar No. 75

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 242

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 21 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 20), 2001

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed.

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported

from the Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of Friday, September 21,

6 2001, providing for consideration or disposition of a bill
2

HR 242 RH

1 to preserve the continued viability of the United States

2 air transportation system.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
2000 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,465
<ALLOWANCES>                                        85
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,747
<PP&E>                                           2,533
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,291
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              485
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,336
<OTHER-SE>                                    (44,328)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,466
<SALES>                                            585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   769
<CGS>                                               66
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  25
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     51
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 51
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        51
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 177

Supporting the National Railroad Hall of Fame, Inc., of Galesburg, Illinois,

in its endeavor to erect a monument known as the National Railroad

Hall of Fame.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 21, 2001

Mr. EVANS (for himself, Mr. CLEMENT, Mr. PHELPS, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr.

FILNER, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. FROST, Mr. RUSH, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. BLAGOJEVICH, and Mr. LIPINSKI) submitted the

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

RESOLUTION

Supporting the National Railroad Hall of Fame, Inc., of

Galesburg, Illinois, in its endeavor to erect a monument

known as the National Railroad Hall of Fame.

Whereas Galesburg, Illinois, has been linked to the history of

railroading since 1849 when the Peoria and Oquawka

Railroad was organized;

Whereas the citizens of Galesburg supported a railroad to

Chicago which was chartered as the Central Military

Tract Railroad in 1851;

Whereas upon completion of the Central Military Tract Railroad, the Northern Cross Railroad joined the Central

Military Tract Railroad at Galesburg;
2

•HRES 177 IH

Whereas in 1886 Galesburg secured the Atchison, Topeka

and Santa Fe Railway and became one of the few places

in the world served by 2 major railroads;

Whereas the National Railroad Hall of Fame, Inc., has been

established in Galesburg and chartered under the laws of

the State of Illinois as a not-for-profit corporation;

Whereas the objectives of the National Railroad Hall of

Fame, Inc., include (1) perpetuating the memory of leaders and innovators in the railroad industry, (2) fostering,

promoting, and encouraging a better understanding of

the origins and growth of railroads, especially in the

United States, and (3) establishing and maintaining a library and collection of documents, reports and other

items of value to contribute to the education of all persons interested in railroading; and

Whereas the National Railroad Hall of Fame, Inc., is planning to erect a monument known as the National Railroad Hall of Fame to honor the men and women who actively participated in the founding and development of

the railroad industry in the United States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports

2 the National Railroad Hall of Fame, Inc., of Galesburg,

3 Illinois, in its endeavor to erect a monument known as

4 the National Railroad Hall of Fame.

Æ
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SALVADOR SANTANA GARNICA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-70688

Agency No. A077-374-900

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 19, 2010** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Salvador Santana Garnica, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from

an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of

removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo

FILED

AUG 02 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-70688

questions of law, Altamirano v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 586, 591 (9th Cir. 2005), and

we deny the petition for review.

Santana Garnica’s contention that his conviction does not render him

ineligible for cancellation of removal because it occurred more than ten years prior

to his application is foreclosed by Flores Juarez v. Mukasey, 530 F.3d 1020, 1022

(9th Cir. 2008) (per curiam) (“[Section] 1229b(b)(1)(C) . . . does not place any

temporal limitation on when the crime was committed.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 265

Amending the rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit access to

classified information by Members who do not have the appropriate

security clearance required for viewing the information.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 12, 2001

Mrs. MYRICK submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit access to classified information by Members who

do not have the appropriate security clearance required

for viewing the information.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. PROHIBITING ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFOR3 MATION BY MEMBERS OF HOUSE OF REP4 RESENTATIVES WITHOUT SECURITY CLEAR5 ANCES.

6 Clause 13 of rule XXIII of the rules of the House

7 of Representatives is amended—
2

•HRES 265 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘Before a Member’’ and insert2 ing ‘‘(a) Before a Member’’; and

3 (2) by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(b) No Member, Delegate, or Resident Commis5 sioner may have access to classified information (including

6 access through attendance at any briefing or other event

7 at which classified information is presented) unless the

8 Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner meets the

9 same security clearance and confidentiality requirements

10 as employees of the Permanent Select Committee on Intel11 ligence.’’.

Æ
#### Thomas W. Butts et al., Appellants, *v.*Marie J. C. Carey et al., Respondents.

Reported below, 143 App. Div. 356.

(Submitted May 15, 1911;

decided May 19, 1911.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 24, 1911, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granting a new trial in an action for partition and to establish a lien on real property.

The motion was made upon the ground that the reversal was upon questions of fact as well as law and, therefore, not appealable to the Court of Appeals.

*Louis O. Van Doren*for motion.

P. *J. Dobson*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
| (1)   | Such Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Tri-Valley Corporation. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   | March 24, 2010                                                                    |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:               | /s/ Maston N. Cunningham                                                          |
|              | Maston N. Cunningham, President and Chief Executive OfficerTri-Valley Corporation |

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for
the periods presented in the Report.
   /s/ C. Neil LyonsC. Neil LyonsChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 34.3


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of The Toledo Edison Company:





We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying “Report on assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Asset-Backed Securities”, that The Toledo Edison Company (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the asset-backed securities transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving phase-in recovery property (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2014 and for the year then ended , excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(i-iv), 1122(d)(2)(i-vii), 1122(d)(3)(ii-iv), and 1122(d)(4)(i-v, ix-xiii, xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform or the servicing activities are applicable to the Platform but are excluded from the scope of management's assertion and are not reported on herein.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.











/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





Cleveland, OH


March 27, 2015
HEP Performance Report Grant Year: Y1___ Y2___ Y3___ Y4___ Y5___

Project Name: Sample University Reporting Period: _ _/_ _/20_ _ - _ _/_ _/20_ _ 

PR Number: S141A_ _ _ _ _ _ Example of Reporting Period: 07/01/20_ _ – 06/30/20_

1

The HEP GPRA 1 Documentation Form 

Directions: Please complete the table below by providing the following information.

For Final Performance Reports, the table should reflect the students who attained a high school 

equivalency (HSE) certification during the Year 5 reporting period. 

 Student Name. Provide the first name, middle initial, and last name of each student who attained 

a HSE high school equivalency certification during the current reporting period.

 HSE Certificate Number. Provide the unique number affixed to the HSE attainer’s certificate.

 The date of the last sub-test taken. Provide the exact date that the HSE attainer took the last 

sub-test in order to pass the HSE. Provide this information in the form of Month/Day/Year (e.g. 

3/29/2011).

 Did the date of the last sub-test occur during the current reporting period? Provide a “Yes” 

or “No” answer to this question. All HSE attainers that you count in this report (all students that 

are listed on this page) should have taken the last sub-test during the current reporting period.

Student Name HSE Certificate 

Number

The date of the 

last sub-test taken 

and passed that 

yielded the HSE

certificate 

(MO/DAY/YR)

Did the date of 

the last sub-test 

occur during the 

current reporting 

period? (Yes/No)

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.
HEP Performance Report Grant Year: Y1___ Y2___ Y3___ Y4___ Y5___

Project Name: Sample University Reporting Period: _ _/_ _/20_ _ - _ _/_ _/20_ _ 

PR Number: S141A_ _ _ _ _ _ Example of Reporting Period: 07/01/20_ _ – 06/30/20_

2

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.

39.

40.

41.

42.

43.

44.

45.

46.

47.

48.

49.

50.

Directions: Provide the appropriate signatures below so that the HEP director and HEP 

authorized representative attest to the accuracy of the information provided above. Please read 

the statement below and provide the required signatures.

I have verified and attest to the fact that all students who are listed above were enrolled in the 

______________________________ HEP project and attained their HSE during the current reporting

period.

________________________________________________________ _________________

(Signature of HEP Director) (Signature Date)

_________________________________________________________ _________________

(Signature of HEP Authorized Representative) (Signature Date)

This list must be: 1) Completed as a Word document; 2) Scanned into PDF format (to capture 

authorizing signatures); and 3)uploaded into the G5 system as a “Narrative.” Please note that this 

process is unlike the uploading process for the APR. Instead of being scanned into a PDF, the APR 

must be converted into a PDF using the Adobe feature and then uploaded into G5 as a “Narrative.”
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.29

                           HEALTH FITNESS CORPORATION
                            2006 EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN

The Health Fitness Corporation Executive Bonus Plan for 2006 is designed to
provide an annual incentive bonus to executive officers based on the achievement
of certain financial objectives, as well as achievement of personal objectives.
The financial objectives are set annually by the Board of Directors. Payments
under the bonus plan that are based on the achievement of financial objectives
include the following performance criteria: revenue, earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization, and profit contribution before corporate
overhead expenses.

The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer may receive bonuses of
between 15% and 50% of their base salary and other executive officers may
receive between 10% and 30% of their base salary under this bonus plan. The
level of bonus received corresponds with the Company achieving between 95% to
110% or more of budgeted financial objectives. No bonuses are earned on
financial objectives for which the Company achieves less than 95% of the planned
target.
**Exhibit 21**COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESAs of May 31, 2006, the Company had the following active subsidiaries:     *State of Incorporation**Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Comprehensive Care Corporation:*   Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc. Nevada   *Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.:*     Comprehensive Care Integration, Inc. DelawareComprehensive Behavioral Care of Connecticut, Inc. FloridaHealthcare Management Services, Inc. MichiganHealthcare Management Services of Michigan, Inc. MichiganCompCare of Pennsylvania, Inc. Nevada   *Affiliates sponsored by Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.:*     Comprehensive Provider Networks of Texas, Inc. Texas
53
-----Original Message----- 

From: ASutkus01@aol.com [mailto:ASutkus01@aol.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 3:46 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Abigail Sutkus 

921 Bruce Ave. 

Flossmoor, IL 60422
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1077.html[7/22/2015 7:35:04 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-cmbx

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1077

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Matt Anonymous

General Comment

Please do not further regulate areas of my personal life. Allow me the freedom to plan for my own retirement. It

 is my personal freedoms that regulation is infringing on, regardless of best intentions. Thank you.
NOTICE OF AMENDMENT

March 11, 2002

	You are hereby notified that effective February 28, 2002 (the "Effective Date"), Section 1.1 of each of the 12% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes due December 31, 2003, Series A 12% Subordinated Convertible Debentures due December 31, 2004 and Series B 12% Subordinated Convertible Debentures due December 31, 2004 issued by Chyron Corporation (the "Company") (collectively, the "Notes") has been amended by the Company so as to eliminate the Company's option to pay interest on the Notes in cash. This amendment is irrevocable.  Accordingly, the Company shall only pay interest on the Notes by increasing the amount of principal owed on the Notes for all interest payments to be made after the Effective Date, inclusive of any accrued interest which has not yet been paid. All other terms of the Notes shall remain in full force and effect.

							**CHYRON CORPORATION**
 

							By:./s/ Roger Henderson		
							      Name: Roger Henderson

							      Title: Chief Executive Officer