alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1476.html[7/23/2015 11:48:10 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-cemq

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1476

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I've saved, others have not. Do not impact my dedication and being responsible for others who have not. I've

 gone with less over a number of years to prepare, virtually my entire life (since 24 yrs old, now 46). The X Gen

 has been told Social Security will not be there when we get to that age, prepare. The savings I've accumulated

 are dollars I could have spent like others already have spent. Please do not hurt me for trying to do the right

 thing.
H. Res. 198

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 2, 2001.

Whereas Tony Gwynn has a lifetime batting average of .338,

15th on the all-time career leaders list, which includes

baseball legends as Ty Cobb, Rogers Hornsby, and Tris

Speaker;

Whereas Gwynn has 3,127 career hits, and only 16 players

have more hits than Gwynn, including Ty Cobb, Hank

Aaron, and Stan Musial;

Whereas Gwynn is the owner of eight Silver Bats for the

eight batting titles he has won, tying him for the National League record with Honus Wagner, with only Ty

Cobb of the American League having won more titles;

Whereas among the all-time Padres career leaders, Gwynn is

first in batting average, hits, runs batted in, and runs;

Whereas Gwynn has not only proven to be a great hitter but

a great defensive player, winning five Gold Glove awards;

Whereas of the 20 seasons Gwynn has played, he has had a

batting average of .300 or better in 19 of those seasons;

Whereas throughout his career, Gwynn has been selected to

16 All-Star teams;

Whereas Gwynn has played in two World Series, in 1984 and

1998;
2

•HRES 198 EH

Whereas, in an era when money dominates the game of baseball, Tony Gwynn chose to play in San Diego for the Padres when it was believed that he could have earned more

money with another team in another city;

Whereas Gwynn is an example of good sportsmanship, having

always conducted himself with dignity, and has been a

role model for young people and for all Americans;

Whereas Gwynn has proven himself to be an active leader not

only in the clubhouse but also in the community;

Whereas Gwynn and his wife Alicia are philanthropists dedicated to their support for the Tony and Alicia Gwynn

Foundation, the Casa de Amparo, the Police Athletic

League, the New Haven Home, the Jackie Robinson

Family YMCA, the Epilepsy Society of San Diego, and

many more organizations; and

Whereas for his community involvement, Gwynn was named

Individual of the Year at the 1998 Equal Opportunity

Awards Dinner, was the 1995 Branch Rickey Award winner, and was the 1998 Padres nominee for Major League

Baseball’s Roberto Clemente Man of the Year Award:

Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates Tony Gwynn on the announcement of his retirement,

honors him for an outstanding career, and thanks him for his

contributions to baseball and to his community.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 24.108 Donations.

An owner whose real property is being acquired may, after being fully informed by the agency of the right to receive just compensation for such property, donate such property or any part thereof, any interest therein, or any compensation paid therefore, to the agency as such owner shall determine. The agency is responsible for ensuring that an appraisal of the real property is obtained unless the owner releases the agency from such obligation, except as provided in § 24.102(c)(2).
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 177 (Thursday, September 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 52379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4505]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Consumer Empowerment 
Workgroup Meeting

ACTION:  Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 20th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Consumer Empowerment Workgroup in accordance with 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

DATES: October 16, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. [Eastern].

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090. Please bring photo ID for entry to a 
Federal building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/consumer/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup will continue its discussion 
on how to encourage the widespread adoption of a personal health record 
that is easy-to-use, portable, longitudinal, affordable, and consumer-
centered.
    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional 
information, go to: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/consumer/ce_instruct.html.

    Dated: September 7, 2007.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 07-4505 Filed 9-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
§ 29.907 When and how must a Tribe appeal a pre-award decision? ( a ) Unless a Tribe appeals, a pre-award decision becomes final 30 days after receipt by the Tribe. To appeal the pre-award decision, a Tribe must submit a written request to the Office of the General Counsel and the Self-Governance Official within 30 days of receiving the pre-award decision. The request must include a statement describing the reasons for appeal and any supporting documentation.
( b ) The Tribe may request to resolve the dispute using an alternative dispute resolution process before the hearing official issues a decision.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 21, 2009

d1214 

# Order

December 21, 2009

138701

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138701 COA: 280767 Wayne CC: 06-010996-01 JOHNNY RAZKOM PU TRUS, a/k/a JOHHNY RAZKOM PUTRUS, a/k/a JOHNY RAZKOM PUTRUS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 10, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors 
LabOne, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 333-92133, No. 333-92135, No. 333-92137, and No. 333-62548 on Form S-8 and the registration statement No. 333-118919 on Form S-3 of LabOne, Inc. of our reports dated March 11, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of LabOne, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of LabOne, Inc.

Our report dated March 11, 2005 on management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of LabOne, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 Health Alliance's and Northwest Toxicology's internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $71.7 million and total revenues of $69.5 million included in the consolidated financial statements of LabOne, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of LabOne, Inc. also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of the laboratory operations of Health Alliance and Northwest Toxicology.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
March 11, 2005
Presidential Documents

37421 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 131 

Tuesday, July 10, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2007–24 of June 28, 2007 

Presidential Determination Under Section 402(c)(2)(A) of the 

Trade Act of 1974—Turkmenistan 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Pursuant to section 402(c)(2)(A) of the Trade Act of 1974 (Public Law 93– 

618), as amended (the ‘‘Act’’), I determine that a waiver by Executive Order 

of the application of subsections (a) and (b) of section 402 of the Act 

with respect to Turkmenistan will substantially promote the objectives of 

section 402. 

On my behalf, please transmit this determination to the Speaker of the 

House of Representatives and to the President of the Senate. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, June 28, 2007. 

[FR Doc. 07–3374 

Filed 7–09–07; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10 


rmajette on PROD1PC64 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 184 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 28, 2001.
    Resolved, That the following Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Forbes.
    Committee on Science: Mr. Forbes.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 38.121 Public information system. ( a ) Each car shall be equipped with a public address system permitting transportation system personnel, or recorded or digitized human speech messages, to announce stations and provide other passenger information. Alternative systems or devices which provide equivalent access are also permitted.
( b ) [Reserved]
Exhibit 10.18


                                    ADDENDUM
                   MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS ADVISORY AGREEMENT

         THIS ADDENDUM (the "Addendum") to the MERGERS AND ACQUISTIONS ADVISORY
AGREEMENT, dated as of April 1, 2005 (the "M&A Agreement"), by and between
Ridgefield Acquisition Corp., a Colorado corporation, having an address at 100
Mill Plain Road, Danbury, Connecticut 06811 (hereinafter referred to as the
"Company"), and Catalyst Financial LLC, a New York limited liability company,
having an address at 100 Mill Plain Road, Danbury, Connecticut 06811
(hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant") is made as of the 1st day of
February 2006.

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Consultant have agreed to amend the M&A
Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this
Addendum.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth
herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

         1.       That paragraph 3. A. (Monthly Fee) of the M&A Agreement shall
                  be amended to provided that monthly fee payable by the Company
                  to the Consultant during the one year period from February 1,
                  2006 though January 31, 2007 shall be increased from $1,000
                  per month to $5,000 per month. Accordingly, during the one
                  year period from February 1, 2006 though January 1, 2007, the
                  Company shall pay a monthly fee in the amount of $5,000.00 to
                  Consultant on the first day of each month commencing on
                  February 1, 2006 and continuing through January 1, 2007.
                  Thereafter, the Company shall pay a monthly fee in the amount
                  of $1,000.00 to Consultant on the first day of each month
                  commencing on February 1, 2007 and continuing through March 1,
                  2008.

         2.       All of the other remaining terms and conditions set forth in
                  the M&A Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

         3.       This Addendum may be executed in any number of counterparts,
                  including facsimile signatures, which shall be deemed as
                  original signatures. All executed counterparts shall
                  constitute one Agreement, notwithstanding that all signatories
                  are not signatories to the original or the same counterpart.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as
of the date first above written.

RIDGEFIELD ACQUISITION CORP.                CONSULTANT

By: /s/ Leonard Hagan                       By: /s/ Steven N. Bronson
    ___________________________                 ___________________________
    Leonard Hagan, Director                     Steven N. Bronson, President
    Ridgefield Acquisition Corp.                Catalyst Financial LLC
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 03-4335



# 
C ALVIN E ARL B UNCH ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge.

(CR-01-193) Submitted: October 31, 2003 Decided: November 14, 2003 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Scott Gsell, LAW OFFICE OF SCOTT GSELL, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., United States Attorney, Kenneth M. Smith, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM: Calvin Bunch pleaded guilty to six counts of bank robbery, six counts of armed bank robbery, and six counts of using, carrying, and brandishing a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence.The convictions stem from six bank robberies that occurred in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, between August 1 and September 17, 2001. On appeal, Bunch contends that because bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (2000), is a lesser included offense of armed bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d) (2000), the bank robbery convictions violate the Double Jeopardy Clause and should be vacated. We agree and remand so that the district court may vacate the bank robbery convictions and associated sentences. The United States contends that Bunch’s guilty plea waived his right to raise the above claim on appeal. A valid guilty plea waives all antecedent nonjurisdictional defects. Tollett v. Henderson , 411 U.S. 258, 267 (1973). Here, the attack is on Bunch’s sentence, which was imposed after entry of the guilty plea. Hence, by pleading guilty, Bunch did not waive his right to bring the instant claim. The Double Jeopardy Clause forbids "multiple punishments for the same offense." North Carolina v. Pearce , 395 U.S. 711, 717 (1969). Bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), is a lesser included offense of armed bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d). United States v. Whitley , 759 F.2d 327, 331 (4th Cir. 1985) (en banc). In light of the double jeopardy violation in this case, we remand so that the district court may vacate the bank robbery convictions and associated sentences. See id.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before us and argument would not aid the decisional process.
REMANDED 2 U NITED S TATES v. B UNCH
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.909 Pattern or practice. The Agency Official may determine that a motor carrier or person acting on behalf of a motor carrier engages or has engaged in a pattern or practice of avoiding regulatory compliance, or masking or otherwise concealing regulatory noncompliance for purposes of this subpart, by considering, among other things, the following factors, which, in the case of persons acting on behalf of a motor carrier, may be related to conduct undertaken on behalf of any motor carrier: ( a ) The frequency, remoteness in time, or continuing nature of the conduct;
( b ) The extent to which the regulatory violations caused by the conduct create a risk to safety;
( c ) The degree to which the conduct has affected the safety of operations, including taking into account any crashes, deaths, or injuries associated with the conduct;
( d ) Whether the motor carrier or person acting on a motor carrier's behalf knew or should have known that the conduct violated applicable statutory or regulatory requirements;
( e ) Safety performance history, including pending or closed enforcement actions, if any;
( f ) Whether the motor carrier or person acting on a motor carrier's behalf engaged in the conduct for the purpose of avoiding compliance or masking or otherwise concealing noncompliance; and
( g ) In the case of a person acting on a motor carrier's behalf, the extent to which the person exercises a controlling influence on the motor carrier's operations.
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.325 What happens after a new entrant has been notified under § 385.319(c) to take corrective action to remedy its safety management practices? ( a ) If the new entrant provides evidence of corrective action acceptable to the FMCSA within the time period provided in § 385.319(c), including any extension of that period authorized under § 385.323, the FMCSA will provide written notification to the new entrant that its DOT new entrant registration will not be revoked and it may continue operations.
( b ) If a new entrant, after being notified that it is required to take corrective action to improve its safety management practices, fails to submit a written response demonstrating corrective action acceptable to FMCSA within the time specified in § 385.319, and any extension of that period authorized under § 385.323, FMCSA will revoke its new entrant registration and issue an out-of-service order effective on: ( 1 ) Day 61 from the notice date for new entrants subject to § 385.319(c)(1).
( 2 ) Day 46 from the notice date for new entrants subject to § 385.319(c)(2).
( 3 ) If an extension has been granted under § 385.323, the day following the expiration of the extension date.
( c ) The new entrant may not operate in interstate commerce on or after the effective date of the out-of-service order.
[67 FR 31983, May 13, 2002, as amended at 73 FR 76490, Dec. 16, 2008]
§ 372.205 Charleston, S.C. The zone adjacent to, and commercially a part of Charleston, S.C., within which transportation by motor vehicle in interstate or foreign commerce, not under common control, management, or arrangement for a continuous carriage or shipment to or from a point beyond such zone, is partially exempt from regulation under 49 U.S.C. 13506(b)(1) includes and is comprised of all points as follows: ( a ) The municipality of Charleston, S.C., itself;
( b ) All points within a line drawn 6 miles beyond the municipal limits of Charleston;
( c ) Those points in Charleston County, S.C., which are not within the areas described in paragraph (b) of this section; and those points in Berkley County, S.C., which are not within the areas described in paragraph (b) of this section, and which are west of South Carolina Highway 41; and all points in Dorchester County, SC.
( d ) All of any municipality any part of which is within the limits of the combined areas defined in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, and
( e ) All of any municipality wholly surrounded, or so surrounded except for a water boundary, by the municipality of Charleston or by any other municipality included under the terms of paragraph (d) of this section.
[41 FR 56653, Dec. 29, 1976, as amended at 46 FR 28658, May 28, 1981; 62 FR 15422, Apr. 1, 1997]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0859.html[7/21/2015 4:45:06 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-k7ys

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0859

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement, keep the government OUT of my personal business. The DOL could be shutdown

 today and no one would notice (aside from the (probably) thousands of employed in the department being

 overpaid and underworked). Tell them to get a real job in the private sector and stop stealing from the taxpaying Amercian public.
§ 37.141 Requirements for a joint paratransit plan. ( a ) Two or more entities with overlapping or contiguous service areas or jurisdictions may develop and submit a joint plan providing for coordinated paratransit service. Joint plans shall identify the participating entities and indicate their commitment to participate in the plan.
( b ) To the maximum extent feasible, all elements of the coordinated plan shall be submitted on January 26, 1992. If a coordinated plan is not completed by January 26, 1992, those entities intending to coordinate paratransit service must submit a general statement declaring their intention to provide coordinated service and each element of the plan specified in § 37.139 to the extent practicable. In addition, the plan must include the following certifications from each entity involved in the coordination effort: ( 1 ) A certification that the entity is committed to providing ADA paratransit service as part of a coordinated plan.
( 2 ) A certification from each public entity participating in the plan that it will maintain current levels of paratransit service until the coordinated plan goes into effect.
( c ) Entities submitting the above certifications and plan elements in lieu of a completed plan on January 26, 1992, must submit a complete plan by July 26, 1992.
( d ) Filing of an individual plan does not preclude an entity from cooperating with other entities in the development or implementation of a joint plan. An entity wishing to join with other entities after its initial submission may do so by meeting the filing requirements of this section.