UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA‐2015‐0977

PETITION FOR EXEMPTION 

Frank C. D’Amato 

dba Droneshutter 

FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 

91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) 

CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI PHANTOM 3 AND DJI INSPIRE 1 

UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA 

MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112-95) 

Submitted on June 17, 2015 

Frank C. D’Amato 

dba Droneshutter 

18 Pear Street 

Barnesville, PA 18214 

Mobile: (570)778-9492 
SUMMARY 

Frank C. D’Amato seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 

91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an 

Unmanned Aircraft System pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 

2012 (FMRA). This exemption will permit Frank C. D’Amato to operate an Unmanned Aircraft 

System (UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of Real 

Property, and landscapes over certain areas of the United States. Search & Rescue efforts and 

Disaster Survey as I have a background of 23 years as a New York City Fire Department Captain 

(Retired in 2011). 

BACKGROUND 

Unmanned Aircraft Systems: The DJI Phantom 3, and the DJI Inspire 1 UASs 

Frank C. D’Amato seeks an exemption to operate one of 2 different DJI UAS systems for marketing 

or for compensation or hire within the NAS. The DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 are vertical 

takeoff and landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing 

electronic tablet or smart phone systems. The DJI Phantom 3 has a maximum gross weight of 

approximately 2 pounds 11 ounces, while having a length of 16 inches width of 16 inches, height of 

8 inches, and a maximum speed of approximately 29 knots. The DJI Inspire 1 has a maximum gross 

weight of 6 pounds 7.5 ounces, a length of 17.3 inches, width of 17.7 inches, height of 11.8 inches, 

and a maximum speed of approximately 42 knots. The DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1UAs are 

equipped with four main rotors; driven by Lithium Polymer battery powered electric motors. 

The DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UAs that will be operated by Frank C. D’Amato will be 

registered in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 44103, Registration of Aircraft, as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, 

Aircraft Registration, and marked in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45, Identification and 

Registration Marking. 

BASIS FOR PETITION 

Petitioner, Frank C. D’Amato, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 

C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), Section 333, Special 

Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems, hereby petitions the Administrator to commercially 

operate the DJI Phantom 3, DJI Inspire 1 UASs in the National Airspace System (NAS), and for an 

exemption from the 6 requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). 

In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned 

aircraft and its operation, Frank C. D’Amato’s operation of DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs 

meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness certificate 

in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. 

Accordingly, Frank C. D’Amato requests relief from Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) 

& (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for maintenance that only 

apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. 

Frank C. D’Amato submits that the requested relief is proper since an equivalent level of safety will 

be ensured. Frank C. D’Amato will use experienced personnel or technicians to perform 

maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, techniques, and 

practices prescribed in the operating documents (DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction 
Manuals). Furthermore, Frank C. D’Amato will document and maintain all maintenance records for 

the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs. 

Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private pilot privileges and 

limitations: Pilot in command, is requested by Frank C. D’Amato to the extent necessary to allow a 

Pilot in Command (PIC) holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as well as an airman 

medical certificate, and who has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight- hour and currency 

requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs in a 

manner consistent with this 7 exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

Frank C. D’Amato seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, because 

the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs do not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance 

with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. As such, Frank C. D’Amato submits that he will ensure that the 

DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1UASs are in an airworthy condition, prior to every flight, by 

determining that the UASs are in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly 

Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual), and that the aircraft are 

in a condition for safe flight. 

Frank C. D’Amato also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121, entitled 

Altimeter Settings, as the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UAs will not have a typical barometric 

altimeter onboard. However, altitude information of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UAs will 

be provided to the PIC via Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment and radio communications 

telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight 

path. This altitude information, combined with Frank C. D’Amato’s operation of the DJI Phantom 3 

and DJI Inspire 1 UASs within visual line of sight, at or below 400 feet AGL, will ensure a level of 

safety equivalent to Section 91.121. 

Additionally, Frank C. D’Amato seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b), 

entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions. Frank C. D’Amato submits that safety will 

not be affected by operation of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UAs during daylight hours in 

visual meteorological conditions (VMC) under visual flight 8 rules (VFR), with enough battery 

power to fly for a total duration of approximately 15 minutes to the first point of intended landing 

and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 5 minutes. 

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, Frank C. D’Amato provides the following information in 

support of its petition for exemption: 

A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner. 

The name and address of the Petitioner and point of contact is: 

Frank C. D’Amato dba Droneshutter 

18 Pear Street 

Barnesville, PA 18214 

(570)778-9492 

Email: damatofc@gmail.com 
B. The Specific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From Which Frank C. D’Amato Seeks Exemption. 

1. Frank C. D’Amato Seeks Exemption from the Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b). 

Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, subsections (a) 

and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part: 

(a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command (PIC) of an aircraft 

that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may that person, for 

compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft. 

(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any 

business or employment if— 

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and 

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. 

2. Frank C. D’Amato Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a). 

Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, subsection (a), states the following: 9(a) No person 

may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition. 

3. Frank C. D’Amato Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121. 

Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, subsection (a), states the following, in part: 

(a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of that aircraft, 

as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when operating-- 

(1) Below 18,000 feet MSL, to-- 

(i) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and within 100 nautical miles of 

the aircraft; 

(ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the current 

reported altimeter setting of an appropriate available station; or 

(iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the departure airport or an 

appropriate altimeter setting available before departure. 

4. Frank C. D’Amato Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b). 

Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, subsection 

(b), states the following: 

(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and 

forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, 

assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 20 minutes. 

5. Frank C. D’Amato Seeks Exemption From The Requirement Of Section 91.405(a). 

Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance required, subsection (a), states the following: Each owner or 

operator of an aircraft— 

(a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required 

inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as 

prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.] 

6. Frank C. D’Amato Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.407(a)(1) 

Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or 

alteration, subsection (a)(1), states the following: 

(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive maintenance, 

rebuilding, or alteration unless-- 

(1) It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under § 43.7 of this chapter[.] 
7. Frank C. D’Amato Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.409(a)(1) And 

91.409(a)(2). 

Section 91.409, entitled Inspections, subsection (a), states the following: 

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an aircraft unless, 

within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had -- 

(1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has been approved for return 

to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 of this chapter; or 

(2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance with part 21 of this 

chapter. 

8. Frank C. D’Amato Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.417(a) And 

91.417(b). 

Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records, subsections (a) and (b), state the following: 

(a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each registered owner or 

operator shall keep the following records for the periods specified in paragraph (b) of this section: 

(1) Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration and records of the 100-hour, 

annual, progressive, and other required or approved inspections, as appropriate, for each aircraft 

(including the airframe) and each engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance of an aircraft. The records 

must include-- 11 (i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) of the work 

performed; and 

(ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and 

(iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person approving the aircraft for return to service. 

(2) Records containing the following information: 

(i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propeller, and each rotor. 

(ii) The current status of life-limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance. 

(iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which are required to be 

overhauled on a specified time basis. 

(iv) The current inspection status of the aircraft, including the time since the last inspection required 

by the inspection program under which the aircraft and its appliances are maintained. 

(v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety directives including, for 

each, the method of compliance, the AD or safety directive number and revision date. If the AD or 

safety directive involves recurring action, the time and date when the next action is required. 

(vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each major alteration to the 

airframe and currently installed engines, rotors, propellers, and appliances. 

(b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods prescribed: 

(1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained until the work is 

repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the work is performed. 

(2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained and transferred with the 

aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold. 

(3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of this chapter shall be 

retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is approved for return to service. 

C. The Extent Of Relief Frank C. D’Amato Seeks And The Reason Frank C. D’Amato Seeks 

The Relief. 

1. Extent Of Relief Frank C. D’Amato Seeks And The Reason Frank C. D’Amato Seeks Relief 

From Section 61.113(a) And (b). 

Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in 

command, is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a private pilot or higher level 
certificate, as well as a current and valid airman medical certificate, and who has met certain flighthour and currency requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight operations for compensation or 

hire. 

This relief is requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state that a private 

pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any business or 

employment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and (2) The aircraft 

does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. As set forth more fully below, Frank 

C. D’Amato submits that an equivalent level of safety will be maintained because no PIC will be 

allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS or DJI Inspire 1 UAS unless that PIC has met certain 

flight-hour and currency requirements, demonstrating that the PIC is able to safely operate either the 

DJI Phantom 3 or DJI Inspire 1 UAS in a manner consistent with the operations specifications as 

described in this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers, as well as maintaining 

appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

Further, Frank C. D’Amato submits that all flights of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, 

conducted by the PIC pursuant to the grant of this Petition: (1) will be 13 incidental to Frank C. 

D’Amato’s business; and (2) will not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. 

2. Extent Of Relief Frank C. D’Amato Seeks And The Reason Frank C. D’Amato Seeks Relief 

From Section 91.7(a). 

Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, is requested to the extent required to 

allow Frank C. D’Amato to determine that the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs are in 

airworthy condition prior to every flight by ensuring that the UAS is in compliance with the 

operating documents (i.e., the Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI 

Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual). 

Frank C. D’Amato seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs do 

not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, 

Frank C. D’Amato will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs are in airworthy 

condition based upon its compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, 

and DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual) prior to every flight, and further, determine 

that the aircraft are in condition for safe flight, as stated in the conditions and limitations below. 

3. Extent Of Relief Frank C. D’Amato Seeks And The Reason Frank C. D’Amato Seeks Relief 

From Section 91.121. 

Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, may be required to allow flight operations of 

the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, which utilize a barometric pressure sensor, GPS 

equipment, and a radio communications telemetry data link to downlink altitude information from 

the UA to the PIC at the ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA requires that any altitude 

information concerning UAS operations be reported to air traffic control (ATC) in feet above ground 

level (AGL), Frank C. D’Amato seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI 

Inspire 1 UA’s altimeter may be set on the ground to zero feet AGL, rather than the local barometric 

pressure or field altitude, before each flight. 

Considering the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is sought to 

the extent necessary to comply with the applicable conditions and limitations stated below. As more 

fully set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety will be maintained since the DJI Phantom 3 and 

DJI Inspire 1 UAs are equipped with a barometric pressure sensor and GPS equipment, which 

automatically ensures that a ground level pressure setting will be established prior to each flight, and 

provides the PIC with altitude information of the UA on the heads-up display of the GCS. 
4. Extent Of Relief Frank C. D’Amato Seeks And The Reason Frank C. D’Amato Seeks Relief 

From Section 91.151(b). 

Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, is requested to 

the extent required to allow flights of the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UAs 

during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), for 

a total duration of 15 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising 

speed, to fly after that for at least 5 minutes. Frank C. D’Amato seeks the requested relief because 

without an exemption from Section 91.151(b), the flight time duration of the battery powered DJI 

Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UAs will severely constrain the practicality of any aerial video or still 

photo flight operations that Frank C. D’Amato proposes to conduct pursuant to this Petition. 

Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 

UASs, the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 operating documents, and Frank C. D’Amato’s proposed 

operating limitations, ensure that Frank C. D’Amato will safely operate the battery powered DJI 

Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UAs during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), 

under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 15 minutes to 

the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 5 

minutes. 

5. Extent Of Relief Frank C. D’Amato Seeks And The Reason Frank C. D’Amato Seeks Relief 

From Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b). 

Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only apply to 

aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, Frank C. D’Amato requests relief from these Sections 

because the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs do not require airworthiness certificates. As set 

forth more fully below, the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs meet the conditions of FMRA 

Section 333 for operation without an airworthiness certificate. Accordingly, Frank C. D’Amato will 

use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs 

using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the UAS operating documents (i.e., the 

Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manuals). Furthermore, 

Frank C. D’Amato will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 3 and 

DJI Inspire 1 UASs. 

D. The Reasons Why Granting Frank C. D’Amato’s Request Would Be In The Public Interest; 

That Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole. 

Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing Frank C. D’Amato to safely, 

efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photography of Real Estate, Vacant Land, and 

subdivisions over certain areas of the United States. Search and Rescue deployment as well as 

disaster survey. 

Additionally, use of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs will decrease congestion of the NAS, 

reduce pollution, and provide significant benefits to the economy. Notably, the benefits of Frank C. 

D’Amato’s proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs will be realized 

without implicating any privacy issues. 

1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS. 

The DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UAs are battery powered and serve as a safe, efficient, and 

economical alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery. By 

reducing the amount of manned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an exemption allowing 

the use of a DJI Phantom 3 or DJI Inspire 1 UAS would reduce the amount of manned aircraft in the 

NAS, reduce noise and air pollution, as well as increase the safety of life and property in the air and 

on the ground. 
2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The DJI Phantom 3 and DJI 

Inspire 1 UASs. 

Conducting aerial acquisitions with the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, instead of manned 

aircraft, will greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the substantial risk to life and property 

in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with traditional manned aircraft flight 

operations. Aside from the lack of flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the DJI Phantom 

3 and DJI Inspire 1 UAs (weighing approximately 2 pounds 11 ounces and 6 pounds 7.5 ounces 

respectively, at their maximum gross weights with lengths of 16 inches and 17.3 inches respectively, 

with widths of 16 inches and 17.7 inches respectively, and with no fuel on board), has less physical 

potential for collateral damage to life and property on the ground, and in the air, compared to the 

manned aircraft that typically conduct similar operations (weighing approximately 4,450 pounds with 

a wingspan of approximately 37 feet, a length of 42 feet, and a fuel capacity of 110 gallons, 

(Specifications of a Bell Jet Ranger 206)). 

3. Performing Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The DJI Phantom 3 and DJI 

Inspire 1 UASs Will Benefit The Economy. 

In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs are also an 

economical alternative to using manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial operations. As such, 

operation of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs will allow United States citizens, like Frank 

C. D’Amato, to remain competitive and contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Specifically, with 

the housing sector, operating the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs is one such 

technology that not only allows citizens such as Frank C. D’Amato to remain competitive and 

profitable, and therefore, provide greater exposure and marketing of said real property, which will 

ultimately contribute to growth of the U.S. economy housing sector. 

4. There Are No Privacy Issues. 

Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been conducted for decades, 

Frank C. D’Amato’s proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs will not 

implicate any privacy issues. Specifically, the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs will be 

operated only in compliance with operating documents (i.e., DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 

Instruction Manual) which requires property owner involvement and in accordance with the Federal 

Aviation Regulations, including the minimum altitude requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.119. 

E. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or How 

The Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That Provided By The 

Rule From Which Frank C. D’Amato Seeks Exemption. 

1. Reasons Why The DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UAs Meet The Conditions Of The FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333. 

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned 

aircraft and its operation, Frank C. D’Amato’s operation of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 

UASs meet the conditions of FMRA Section 333, and will not require an airworthiness certificate in 

accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. 

Section 333 provides authority for a UAS to operate without airworthiness certification and sets forth 

requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, 

or otherwise pose a threat to national security. Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states the following, 

in part: 
(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not later than 180 days 

after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall determine if certain 

unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system before completion of 

the plan and rulemaking required by section 332 of this Act or the guidance required by section 334 

of this Act. 

(b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.--In making the determination under subsection (a), 

the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum-- 

(1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, weight, speed, 

operational capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, and operation within visual line of 

sight do not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public or pose a threat to 

national security; and 

(2) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or airworthiness certification under 

section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, is required for the operation of unmanned aircraft 

systems identified under paragraph (1). 

(c) Requirements for Safe Operation.--If the Secretary determines under this section that certain 

unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall 

establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system. 

In seeking this exemption, Frank C. D’Amato submits that the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 

UASs can operate safely in the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated by: (a) the 

characteristics of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs; (b) the pilot certification requirement; 

and (c) the specific operating limitations. 

a. The Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs Demonstrate Its Safe 

Characteristics. 

The DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs do not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, 

or otherwise pose a threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed, and operational 

capability. 

i. Technical Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs. 

The technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs are set forth by the DJI 

Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 Specifications and Data Sheet, attached hereto as Exhibit A and B. 

ii. The DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs Autonomous Flight And Navigation Modes 

Enable The UASs To Remain Within A Defined Operational Area. 

The DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs may be operated in both manual and fully autonomous 

flight modes. A complete description of the flight and navigational modes of the DJI Phantom 3 and 

DJI Inspire 1 UASs is provided in the DJI Phantom 3 and the DJI Inspire 1 User Manuals, attached 

hereto as Exhibit C and D. 

iii. The DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs Are Designed For Automatic Return To Home 

Point Or Hover In The Event Of Loss Of The Control Link Or Navigation. 

When the Control Link is lost, the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UAs will remain stationary, in 

flight, for 3 seconds or more. If, after 3 seconds, the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UAs do not 

reacquire control link data from the GCS, the UAs will assume that the Control Link is lost and the 

UAs will return to the home position (i.e., failsafe mode) via GPS, and will descend to the takeoff 

position and shutdown. 

A complete description of the Failsafe Functions of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS and the DJI Inspire 1 

User Manuals respectively, attached hereto as Exhibit C and D. 

iv. The DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 Safety Zones. 

A recent firmware update provides Safety Zones whereby restrictions are self imposed by the 

software in the UAS. The restricted areas are divided into Category A, and Category B. Category A 

is around larger airports like LAX and Heathrow. Within 1.5 miles of this zone, the UA will not take 

off. Between 1.5 miles and 5 miles, the maximum altitude is 35 feet. If flying within 320 feet this 
safety zone, a warning message will appear on the DJI Vision app. Category B safety zone is around 

smaller airports. Within .6 miles of this zone, the UA will not take off. If flying within .6 miles this 

safety zone, a warning message will appear on the DJI Vision app., A complete description of the 

“Flight Restriction of Restricted Areas” of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 GCS and flight 

control software is provided the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual and the DJI Inspire 1 User Manuals 

respectively. The DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 User Manuals are attached hereto as Exhibits C 

and D. 

b. Flight Operations Of DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs Are Limited To The Line Of 

Sight Of A Certificated Pilot in Command With A Safety Observer. 

Frank C. D’Amato will only utilize certificated pilots who possess a current and valid airman 

medical certificate to act as a pilot in command (PIC) of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs. 

Additionally, a safety observer will assist all pilots during flight time. c. Flights Of DJI Phantom 3 

and DJI Inspire 1 UASs Will Be Conducted Pursuant To Specific Operating Limitations. 

In seeking this exemption, Frank C. D’Amato proposes to commercially operate DJI Phantom 3 and 

DJI Inspire 1 UASs for the special purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain 

areas of United States, pursuant to the following specific operating limitations: 

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the following aircraft described 

in the operating documents, rotorcraft UASs weighing less than 55 pounds maximum gross weight: 

DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Proposed operations of any other 

aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this grant. 

2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations for the purpose of 

aerial video and photography. 

3. The UAs may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots. 

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level (AGL), as 

indicated by the procedures specified in the operating documents unless a special request is made and 

approved by ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC must be in feet AGL. 

5. The UAs must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires 

the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as 

specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate. 

6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is not permitted. 

7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used to satisfy the VLOS 

requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The SO and PIC must be able to 

communicate verbally at all times. Electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight 

operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation 

for the duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the SO can perform the functions prescribed 

in the operating documents. 

8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with seeing and avoiding other 

air traffic and other ground based obstacles/obstructions and is not permitted to operate the camera or 

other instruments. 

9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible during UAS operations 

and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions 
and limitations contained in the grant of exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating 

documents, the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption take precedence and 

must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating 

documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s 

responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator 

upon request. The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for 

extension or amendment to the grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or 

revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted the exemption, then the operator must 

petition for amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) may 

be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents. 

10. Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for safe flight. 

If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is 

prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAS is found 

to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground Control Station must be included in the preflight 

inspection. All maintenance and alterations must be properly documented in the aircraft records. 

11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation or flight 

characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight. 

The PIC who conducts the functional test flight must make an entry in the aircraft records. 

12. The pre-flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable 

components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the relevant sections of the operating 

documents. 

13. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component, maintenance, overhaul, 

replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements. 

14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping requirements, in 

accordance with the operating documents. Maintenance, inspection, alterations, and status of 

replacement/overhaul component parts must be noted in the aircraft records, including total time in 

service, description of work accomplished, and the signature of the authorized person returning the 

UAS to service. 

15. Each UASs operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer Safety Bulletins. 

16. The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the corrective action taken 

against discrepancies discovered between inspections. 

17. The PIC must possess at least a private pilot certificate and at least a current third- class medical 

certificate or valid driver’s license issued by a state. 

18. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the operator’s qualification 

criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the 

UAS will be operated under the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification 

flight hours must be logged in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b). Flights for the 

purposes of training the operator’s PICs are permitted under the terms of the exemption. However, 

training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During training, 

proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are 
considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from 

nonparticipants in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 91.119. 

19. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1.1. All operations 

must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). If flight at night is required, a 

special request will be made at the FAA office closest to proposed area of operations. Flights under 

special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized. 

20. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point as denoted on a 

current FAA-published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s 

management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as required 

by the operator’s COA. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available 

to the Administrator upon request. 

21. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a 

cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC. 

22. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a pre- determined 

location within the planned operating area and land or be recovered in accordance with the operating 

documents. 

23. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies in accordance 

with the operating documents. 

24. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather 

conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising speed to the intended landing point and 

land the UA with 25% battery power remaining. 

25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of Waiver or 

Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the grant of exemption. This COA 

will also require the operator to request a Notice to Airman (NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in 

advance, but not less than 48 hours prior to the operation. All operations shall be conducted in 

accordance with airspace requirements in the ATO issued COA including class of airspace, altitude 

level and potential transponder requirements. 

26. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified by serial number, 

registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have identification (N- Number) markings in 

accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable. 

27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and control of the 

UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or other appropriate 

government oversight agency requirements. 

28. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the PIC at the 

Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the UAS is operating. These documents must be made 

available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. 

29. The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all manned aviation operations and 

activities at all times. 
30. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 

31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons (persons 

other than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons), vessels, vehicles, and structures 

unless: 

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons from the UA 

and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons 

remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such 

protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately and/or; 

b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the owner/controller of such 

vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission and the PIC has made a safety assessment of 

the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard, 

and; 

c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons do not present an undue 

hazard to those persons per § 91.119(a). 

32. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with permission 

from the land owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from land owner/controller 

or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted. 

33. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of 

the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to the FAA's UAS 

Integration Office (AFS-80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National 

Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: 

www.ntsb.gov. 

2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b) Would 

Not Adversely Affect Safety. 

Frank C. D’Amato submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section 61.113(a) and 

(b) will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 

1 UASs unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour and currency 

requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 or DJI Inspire 1 UAS in a 

manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining 

appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

Considering Frank C. D’Amato’s proposed area of operations, and the operating limitations set forthabove; the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge requirements to those of 

commercial pilot requirements (See Exemption No. 11062); and the airmanship skills necessary to 

safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 or DJI Inspire 1 UAS, Frank C. D’Amato submits that the 

additional manned airmanship experience of a commercially certificated pilot would not correlate to 

the airmanship skills necessary for Frank C. D’Amato’s specific proposed flight operations. 

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 

11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 

11156, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). 

Frank C. D’Amato will not allow any PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 3 or DJI Inspire 1 UAS unless 

that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour requirements or the DJI Phantom 3 or 

DJI Inspire 1 UAS training and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI 

Phantom 3 or DJI Inspire 1 UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and 
emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and 

structures. 

Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 

61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5 hours of those hours 

as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the 

exemption). In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in 

the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). 

As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight experience that was 

obtained in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of safety during 

Frank C. D’Amato’s proposed operations. The Administrator has held that prior documented flight 

experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would ensure safe operations, 

stating as follows: 

In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for the purpose of 

motion picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a 

manner consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot including at 

least 10 hours logged as a UAS pilot with a multi-rotor UAS. Prior to operations under Exemption 

No. 11062, the PIC must also have accumulated and logged a minimum of 5 hours as a UAS pilot 

operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption. For 

clarification, the FAA considers these minimum hour requirements to be inclusive rather than 

additive; i.e. 5 hours make and model time may be included in the 10 hours of multi-rotor time and 

the 10 hours may be included in the total 25 hours of UAS rotorcraft time. In addition to the hour 

requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for 

currency purposes). The FAA finds that at a minimum, the flight-hour requirements in Exemption 

No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build proficiency in the skills necessary to safely conduct 

the petitioner’s proposed operations. The FAA also finds that prior documented flight experience that 

was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would satisfy this requirement. Training, 

proficiency, and experience-building flights can also be conducted under the grant of exemption to 

accomplish the required flight time. During training, proficiency, and experience-building flights the 

PIC is required to operate the UA with appropriate distances in accordance with 14 C.F.R 91.119. 

Exemption No. 11138 at page 15. 

Accordingly, Frank C. D’Amato will ensure safe operations by not allowing any PIC to operate the 

DJI Phantom 3 or DJI Inspire 1 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flighthour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 or DJI 

Inspire 1 UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency 

maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

3. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a) Would Not 

Adversely Affect Safety. 

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.7(a) will be maintained because prior to 

every flight, Frank C. D’Amato will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 or DJI Inspire 1 UAS is in an 

airworthy condition based upon the UAS’s compliance with its operating documents and as stated in 

the conditions and limitations herein. 

Additionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.7(a) specific to UAS, in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 

11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 

11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). 

4. Reasons Why an Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121 Would Not 

Adversely Affect Safety. 
The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.121 will be maintained because the altitude 

information of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UAs will be provided to the PIC via GPS 

equipment and a radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the 

GCS for active monitoring of the flight path and altitude. This altitude information, combined with 

Frank C. D’Amato’s operation of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UAs within visual line of 

sight, at or below 500 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. The 

altitude information will be generated by GPS equipment installed onboard the aircraft. Prior to each 

flight, a zero altitude initiation point is automatically established by the UASs at ground level. 

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.121 specific to UAS, in circumstances 

similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 

11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 

11159, 11160, 11161). 

5. Reasons Why an Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b) Would Not 

Adversely Affect Safety. 

A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. 

Section 91.151(b) as a result of (1) the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 

1 UASs; (2) the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and (3) the location of the proposed 

flight operations. Accordingly, Frank C. D’Amato will ensure that it will safely operate the battery 

powered DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UAs during daylight hours in VFR conditions, with 

enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 15 minutes to the first point of intended landing 

and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 5 minutes. 

Here, as in Exemption No. 11109, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 

1 UASs; the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and the location of the proposed 

operations, will ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b). 

Furthermore, safety will be ensured as the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs provide audible 

and visual warnings to the PIC at the GCS when the UAs experiences low battery voltage, the first 

warning occurring at approximately 33% remaining battery power, and again at approximately 10% 

remaining battery power. At the critically low battery level, the DJI Phantom Vision+ and DJI Inspire 

1 UASs will descend and land automatically. 

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Section 91.151 establish that 

safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the 

UAS are considered. Relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the 

minimums prescribed in Section 91.151, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650. 

Moreover, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.151 specific to UAS, in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 8811, 

10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11136, 

11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). 

6. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety. 

In seeking this exemption, Frank C. D’Amato submits that the equivalent level of safety with regard 

to the regulatory maintenance and alteration requirements established by Sections 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) will be met because Frank C. D’Amato will 

use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs 

using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., the Aerial 

Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction 

Manual). Furthermore, Frank C. D’Amato will document and maintain all maintenance records for 

the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs. 
Since the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs will be inspected as prescribed by the operating 

documents, Frank C. D’Amato will maintain the equivalent level of safety established by Sections 

91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1), and 91.409(a)(2). A copy of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 User 

Manuals are attached hereto as Exhibit C and D; a copy of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UAS 

Maintenance LOG is attached hereto as Exhibit E. 

Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely affect safety because Frank C. D’Amato will use 

trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive maintenance on the UAS using 

the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed by the operating documents. 

Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety established by 

Sections 91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI 

Inspire 1 UASs will be performed by trained technicians. Maintenance will be documented and 

maintained utilizing the monthly maintenance log. 

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is not adversely affected when the 

technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered. 

In consideration of Frank C. D’Amato’s proposed operating limitations, the operating documents, 

and the technical aspects of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, Frank C. D’Amato submits 

that safety will not be adversely affected by granting exemption from 14 C.F.R. Sections 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1) and (a)(2), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b). The FAA has previously granted relief 

specific to UAS in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. 

Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 

11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). 

7. The FAA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions For Safe Operation. 

In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) and 14 

C.F.R. § 21.16 entitled Special Conditions, Frank C. D’Amato requests that the FAA prescribe 

special conditions for the intended operation of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, which 

contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety 

equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7 

(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). Such 

special conditions will permit safe operation of the UAs for the limited purpose of conducting aerial 

video and photography over certain areas of the United States for compensation or hire. FMRA 

Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users 

of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the 

authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification in accordance with any 

requirements that must be established for the safe operation of the UAS in the NAS. 

Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, for 

operation of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, since the airworthiness regulations of 14 

C.F.R. Part 21 do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, due to the novel or unusual 

design features of the aircraft. Section 21.16, entitled Special Conditions, states the following: 

If the FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations of this subchapter do not contain adequate or 

appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller because of a novel or unusual 

design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller, he prescribes special conditions and 

amendments thereto for the product. The special conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of 

this chapter and contain such safety standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the FAA 

finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in the regulations. 

See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16. 

Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA may prescribe 

special conditions for Leading Edge’s intended operation of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 
UASs, which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level 

of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R Sections 

61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 

91.417(a) & (b). 

F. A Summary That Can Be Published In The Federal Register, stating: The Rules From 

Which Frank C. D’Amato Seeks Exemption: 

Frank C. D’Amato seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a)&(b), 

91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). 

A Brief Description Of The Nature Of The Exemption Frank C. D’Amato Seeks: 

This exemption will permit Frank C. D’Amato to commercially operate an Unmanned Aircraft 

System (UAS) for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the 

United States. Perform Search & Rescue, and disaster surveys.

G. Any Additional Information, Views, Or Arguments Available To Support Frank C. 

D’Amato’s Request. 

This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 

(FMRA) Section 333, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if certain UAS may 

operate safely in the NAS. As such, Frank C. D’Amato’s request for exemption may be granted 

pursuant to the authority of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as set forth above. 

FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to 

users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides 

the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification. 

As discussed in detail above, Frank C. D’Amato will operate the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 

UASs safely in the NAS, without creating a hazard to users of the NAS, or the public, or otherwise 

pose a threat to national security. 

CONCLUSION 

As set forth herein, Frank C. D’Amato seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.61 and Section 

333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will permit safe operation 

of the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs commercially, without an airworthiness certificate, for 

the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United 

States. By granting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate 

of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, while also advancing the interests of the public, 

by allowing Frank C. D’Amato to safely, efficiently, and economically operate the DJI Phantom 3 

and DJI Inspire 1 UASs commercially within the NAS. 

WHEREFORE, in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA Modernization 

and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, Frank C. D’Amato respectfully requests that the Administrator 

grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 

91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and 

permit Leading Edge to operate the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire 1 UASs commercially for the 

purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States. 
Dated: June 17, 2015 

Respectfully submitted, 

Frank C. D’Amato 

Dba Droneshutter 

18 Pear Street 

Barnesville, PA 18214 

Mobile: (570)778-9492 

Email: damatofc@gmail.com 

Appendices: 

A – DJI Phantom 3 Specifications Data Sheet 

B – DJI Inspire 1 Specifications Data Sheet 

C – DJI Phantom 3 Manufacturer’s User Manual 

D – DJI Inspire 1 Manufacturer’s User Manual