p. 1 

# OAR Box 1490 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 3 ) IV-B-3 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 8/4/2008 11:51:46

AM Sheet 3 of 273P. 2 

# |\/~6- 3

MEMORANDU M TO : FROM : DATE : SUBJECT : REFERENCE : I .

II . FINA L TRI P REPOR T NONCONFIDENTIA L VERSION Projec t file o f Reinforce dPlastic s Composite s Manufacturin g NESHA P Keit h Barnett , U . S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Emissio n Standard s Divisio n February 6 , 2001 , Revise dMay 6 an dSeptembe r 19 , 200 2 Sit e visi t t o American Standar dInc . Reinforce dPlastic s Composite s Manufacturin g NESHAP , ES D Projec t No . 93/5 8 INTRODUCTIO N AND PURPOS E Th e purpos e ofthi s visi t

was t o obtai n informatio n o n th e reinforce dplasti c composite s manufacturin g operation s a t th e America

n Standar dfacilit

y locate di

n Salem , Ohio . Specifically w e wante dt o focu s o n th e captur e an dcontro l o f emission s fromth e manufactur e o f reinforce dplasti c bathtubs . PLAC E AN D DAT E American Standard , Inc . 60 5 South Ellsworth Avenu e Salem , Ohi o 4446 0 February 17 , 200 0 330-332-995 4 III . ATTENDEE S 

### FE B 

### 2 7 

### K'B EP A AI R DOCKE T American Standar d- Corporat e Mr . Ronal dD . Barndt , TeamLeader , Produc t Developmen t Mr . Scott Flemming , Corporat e Environmental Enginee r American Standar d- Salem Mr . Eugen e (Gene ) Garczewshi , Manager , Safet y an dEmploymen t Mr . Mark Koepsel , Proces s Owne r Mr . Karl T . Kuszaj , Chemis t Mr . Willia

mWeltman , EnvironmentalP. 3



### Frees . Inc . (Therma

l Oxidize r Vendor ) Mr . Jac k Hanle y U . S . Environmenta

l Protectio n Agenc

y Representative s Mr . Keit h Barnett , USEPA , Environmenta l Enginee r Ms . Melanie Proctor , Pacifi c Environmenta

l Service s (contracto r

fo r USEPA) Ohio Environmenta

l Protectio n Agenc

y Mr . Darre n J . Machuga , Distric t

Representativ e IV . SIT

E INFORMATIO

N Thi s sit e visi t coveredth e manufacturin

g facilit y i n Salem, Ohio . Th

e compan y ha d preparedadetailedrespons e t o alis t of question s fo

r th e facilit y prior t o th e sit e visit . Thi s informatio n i s includeda s attachmen

t 1 . Subsequen

t t o th e sit e visit , America

n Standar dprovided informatio n fro mth e emissio

n tes t repor t datedOctobe

r 10 , 1997 . Thi s information i s includeda s attachmen t 2 . America n Standar dmanufacture s reinforcedplasti c bathtubs . The tub s are mad e b y vacuu mformin g a n acrylic sheet , an

dthe n applyin g polyeste r resi n an dreinforcemen

t t o th e acrylic . Using the acrylic sheet s a s th e surface ofth e tu b eliminate s th e nee

dfo r ge l coa t i n th e productio n process . On

e reaso n give

n fo r converting t o acrylic surface s fo r th e tub s fromge

l coa t wa s thi s chang e eliminate

dth e styrene emission s associatedwit h ge l coa t application . Thi s facilit

y currentl y generate s approximatel

y 11 0 ton s pe

r yea r of styren e emission s fo

r th e productio n proces s operating a

t 2 4 hour s pe r day , 7 day s pe

r week . B y eliminatin

g ge l coa t an dapplyin g a contro l devic e wit

h adesig n efficienc y of 9 5 percent , th e facility' s emission s wouldb e belo w 1 0 tpy , an dtherefor e i t wouldb e asynthetic mino

r sourc e exemp

t fromTitl e V an

dNESHA P requirements . Figur e 1 present s aproces s flo

w diagra mofth e bathtu

b productio n process . Th

e forme d acrylic shape s ar

e place don aconveye

r bel t an dente r aspra y are atha t wa s designedt o b e a permanen t total enclosure . The entranc e t o th e spra y boot h i s a n 8 x 5 foo t openin g hun g wit h plasti c strips . Th

e strip s ar e sid e b y sid e wit h n o gap s o r overlap . Th

e boot h i s 4 0 x 1 6 x 7 fee

t i n siz e an dha s tw o spra

y stations . Th

e acrylic shee

t receive s afirst

laye r of laminat e using a n atomize dchoppe r spra y gun . The acrylic shape ca n spi n o n the conveye

r t o allow al

l side s t o b e accesse dfromone sid

e ofth e conveyer . Th

e nex t operator roll s out th e laminat

e an dadd s additiona l plywoo dreinforcement . Th e thir doperator spray s asecon

dlaye r of resi n an d reinforcement . Th

e fourt h operato r doe s th e final rollout . Therefor e there ar e atota l of 4 operator s i n th e spra y boot h an y on e time . Th e bathtu b exits the spra

y boot h through a8 x 4 foo

t openin g als o hung wit

h plasti c strip s wit

h no gap s or

overlap . Th e tu b the n enter s acur

e ove n usedt o accelerat

e the cur e process . Th

e ove n i s 5 0 x 1 6 x 5. 5 fee t i n size , wit h a n entr y an dexi t opening s of

1 6 x 5 feet, als o hung wit

h plasti c strip s wit

h n o gap s or overlap . Once th e tu

b leave s the curing ove

n i t i s completel

y curedan dther e ar e n o styren e emissions .America n Standard , Inc . - Salem , Ohi o Acrylic s FR P Spra

y Boot h - R00 8

O J

Heate d Ai r 2.00 0 CF M FR P Laminate d Bathin g Vessels ^ Product s of Combustio n (C02 . H2 0 ,N2.02 ) <r

Combustio n Gase s 30 0 CF M / k Contaminate d Ai r

200 0 CF M i \

CUR E Styren e Emission s

STYREN E CONTRO L DEVIC E Styren e Emission s Combustio n Ai r

Contaminate d Ai r 28,00 0 CF M

ROL L SPRA

Y WOO D SPRA Y Heate d

Make-u p Ai r 25.00 0 CF M Thermoforme d **• £Acryli c Shape s

Catalyzed , Rile d Polyeste rResi n Glas s Rovin g Ptywoo d Figur e 1 Fihftrglas RRatTvm h Pm^i^n n Pm^ O C nP. 5

Resi n i s store di

n 2 storag e tanks . Th e resi n i s pumpe dt o th e Naut amixe r wher e th e filler i s added . Resi n i s bein g mixe dabou t 7 5 percen t

ofth e time . Mixe dfilledresi n i s the n pumpe dt o aholdin g tan k

beneat h th e Naut amixer . Th e facilit y operate s approximatel y 2 4 hour s pe r day , 5 day s pe r week , an d5 0 week s pe r

year . (Sinc e th e site visi t thi s proces s ha s changed . Currentl y th e resi n i s pumpe dfromstorag e t o ashea r mixer wer e th e filler

an dapigmen t

ar e added . Th e mixtur e i s the n pumpe dt o th e Naut amixer whic h i s use da s aholdin g tan k an dt akee p th e material s mixed . Bot h mixer s ven t t o th e contro l device. ) Thi s facilit

y als o make s mold s o n site . Ther e ar e tw o type s o f mold s made . Thes e ar e mold s for th e reinforce dplasti c bathtubs , an dmold s for th e thermoformtoolin g operation . Th e mol dspray boot h i s als o designe dt o b e aPT E an dvent s t o th e contro l device . Th e proces s flow diagramfo r

mol dproductio n i s show n i n figure 2 . Attachmen t

3 present s drawing s ofth e plan t floor layou t showin g location s o f

mixin g area s an dth e mol dmakin g spray booth . Attachmen t 4 present s stac k

flow measuremen t

dat a prio r t o installatio n ofth e contro l device . Emission s an dControl s Ther e ar e controlle dthre e HA P emissio n point s i n thi s facility . Thes e ar e th e productio n spra y an drollou t

boot h an dth e cur e oven , th e mol dspray booth , an daNaut amixer . Ther e ar e als o 2 resi n storag e tank s tha t ven t t o atmosphere . Storag e tan k emission s ar e wel l belo w 1 tpy . A s show n in figure 1 , th e productio n spray boot h an dcur e ove n exhaus t 28,00 0 cf

mt o th e contro l device . Th e measure d8-hou r TWA' s i n thi s boot h rang e fro m7 8 pp mfo r operato r # 1 t o 1 8 pp mfor

operato r #3 . Thes e test s wer e don e wit h acollectio n pump . Employee s in th e spra y booth wear

respirators . Th e mol dspray boot h ha s a n estimate dexhaus t

rat e o f 700 0 cfm . Thi s spray boot h operate s 2 2 hour s pe r

day . Operatio n i

n th e spra y boot h includ e makin g tool s (molds) , repairin g tools , an dproductio n o f

durabon dproduc t

( aspecialize dlin e o f

tubs) . Th e exhaus t

fan s for th e mol dspray boot h ar e of

f whe n th e boot h i s no t

in use . Bot h th e productio n an dmol dspray booth s wer e designe dt o b e PTE . Th e productio n spra y boot h wa s als o teste db y th e original air emissio n permittin g authority . Thi s local agenc y ha s sinc e bee n disbande dan dth e permi t i s no w handle ddirectl y b y th e Stat e o f Ohi o EP A regional office . Base do n arevie w ofth e EP A Metho d20 4 requirements , i t appear s tha t

th e productio n spray boot h a s currentl y configure dma y not mee t th e 20 0 fp

mair flow requirement s at th e entranc e an dexit . American Standar dintend s t o mak e modification s t o th e spra y boot h t o brin g it int o compliance .America n Standard , Inc . - Salem , Ohi o Mol d Makin g Spra y Boot h - R01 8

<- n Product s of

Combustio n < (C02 . H20 , N2 . 02 )

Polyeste rMold s fo r

Manufacturin g Styren e €mJssioFi s Aceton e

Emission s Styren e Contro l Devic e Styren e Emission s Aceton e

Emission s Spray Boot h

v Maste rMold s Combustio n Ai r

Catalyzed , Fille d Polyeste rResi n Glas s Rovin g Stee l Reinforcemen t Aceton e

Maste rMold s (- £ i x -jv $ ^ ) 1 pe rda y 1 pe rda y 

### Figur e 2 . MoldProductio n Process .P. 7



### Th e Naut amixe

r i s aclose dvesse l tha t i s ventedt o the contro l device . Thi s i s alow shea r mixe r typ e designedprimaril

y fo r the mixin g pharmaceutical s an

drocket fiiel. Ther

e i s asecon

d mixe r a t th e facilit y but th e Nautamixe

r i s primary . Th

e secondar y mixe r i s no t ventedt o th e contro l devic e a

t the tim e ofth e sit e visit . (Thi s mixe

r ha s bee n relocated , an

di s now primary . I t i s currentl y vente dt o th e contro l device. ) Figur e 3 show s th e proces s flow diagra mofth e contro l device . Thi s i s aPolya dsyste m originall y purchasedfromWeatherly . Th e origina l syste mha dacatalyti c oxidizer . However , th e catalys t wa s continuall

y foulin g due t o sulfu

r dioxide , chlorine , an

dsilic apresen

t i n th e combustion air . Th

e catalys t manufacture

r suggestedcleanin

g wit h sodiu mhydroxide . However , th e plan t opte dt o replac e th e catalyti c oxidize r wit h atherma l oxidize r furnishe dby Frees , Inc . Th e styrene lade

n exhaus t enter s the adsorbe

r an di s adsorbedi

n afluidizedbedusing Bonopor e adsorbent . Th

e absorben t enter s th e adsorbe

r a t the top , an

dmove s downwar

d through fluidizedbed s an

dexit s th e botto mofth e adsorber . Th e clea n exhaus t the n goe s through acyclon e t o recove

r an y entrainedadsorbent , i s combine dwit h the oxidize

r exhaust , an

dthe n goe s t o atmosphere . Th e styrene lade

n adsorben

t i s conveye

di n aclosedsyste

mt o th e desorbe

r tower . Ambien t ai r passe s through ahea

t exchange r an di s heatedt o 25 0 degree s F . Thi s i s th e minimu m temperatur e necessar y fo r desorption . Th

e heatedai r flow int o the desorbe

r i s 110 0 t o 120 0 cfm . Th e heatedai r the n flows u p the desorbe

r tower , desorbing th e styrene . The desorptio n ai r the n passe s through th e tw o filters an darecuperativ e hea

t exchange r an dint o th e oxidize

r combustion chamber . Th

e combustion cambe

r temperatur

e i s maintaine

da t 140 0 degree s F fo

r 2 seconds . Afte r combustion , th e oxidize

r exhaus t i s usedt o hea

t th e incomin

g ambien t air , i s combine

dwit h th e cleane dai r exitin g th e adsorber , an

dexhaust s through the singl e stack . Th

e facilit y i s plannin

g t o conver t fromon e stack t o tw o stacks , on

e fo r th e oxidize

r an done fo r th e desorber . Th

e tota l syste mstati c pressur

e drop i s 1 9 inche s of

water . Th e contro l devic e ha s bee

n teste dtwice . The first

tes t wa s performe

di n Septembe

r 199 7 an dthe result s wer

e a94. 7 percen

t destructio n efficiency . A subsequen t tes t performe di n Marc h of 2000 showe

dadestructio n efficienc

y of 85. 5 percen

t (9 0 percen

t remova l i n th e adsorber , an

d 9 5 percen t destructio n i

n th e oxidizer) . The

y have discoveredsevera

l problem s i

n th e adsorbe

r uni t tha t ar e being corrected . Onc e the repair s ar e complet e anothe r emissio n tes t wil l b e performed . Contro l Equipmen

t Maintenanc e an

dCost s Th e origina l uni t cos t $495,000 . Th

e facilit y estimatedtha

t th e capita l cos t o f equipmentpurchasedsinc e wa s u p t o $ 1 million .m r mr r t t TOT*, imo c un i . 4l»/M tm

i T



### Figur e 3 . Schemati c o f

Polya dcontro l device . 0 0P. 9



### Th e mai n operationa

l proble mwit h th e Polya

dsyste mhas bee n balancing the fans . Ther

e ar e tw o fans wit

h differen t operating curves . Smal

l change s i n stati c pressur

e resul t i n larg e change s i n fa n requirements , whic

h result s i n a n unstabl e system . Th

e facilit y plane t o replac e one ofth e fan s t o correc t

thi s problem . Th e origina l contro l syste

mha dacyclon e betwee n th e desorbe

r an dth e oxidize

r t o remove th e entrainedadsorbent . Th e cyclon e provedt o b e inadequat

e becaus e entrained adsorben t wa s pluggin

g th e oxidizer . The

y now have tw o filters betwee n th e desorbe

r an dth e oxidizer . The first

i s a n 1.2 5 inc h thicknes s an

dth e secon

di s .25 inc

h thickness .P.1 0

AMERICA N STANDAR D INC . Unite d State s Plumbin g Product s Grou p 60 5 S . Ellswort h Avenu e Salem , O H 4446 0 Telephone : 330-332-995 4 Telefax : 330-337-223 5 Attachmen t 1 Underline dinformatio

n ar e note s mad

e during sit

e visi t whic h wer e added t o thi s attachment . Requeste dInformatio n ADD-O N CONTRO L DEVIC

E TECHNICA

L DAT A 1 . Hazardou s ai rpollutan t (HAP ) concentratio n a t th e inle t t o th e contro l device : A s a percentag e o f LE L (1.1 % fo rstyrene ) th e syste m typicall y run s a t 7 t o 9 % o f th e LEL . 2 . Flo w rat e t o th e add-o n contro l device : 35,00 0 aCF

M o f air , or 255 5 #

m /mi n 35,00 0 cf

mi s th e desig

n 3 . Annua l operatin g hour s ofth e contro l device : 5,80 0 hour s (11 6 hrs/week , 5 0 week s pe ryear ) 10-1 5 minute s ar e require dt o 4 . Statu s o

f contro l devic e durin g non-operationa l hours : star t u p th e contro l device . During th e wee k

i s ful l o n Thi s ma v change s late

r t o turnin g contro l of

f Weekend s ful

l of f whe n spra y boot h i s down . 5 . Confir m Octobe r10 , 199 7 D.E . tes t repor t result s fo radd-o n contro l devic e Cop y attache d 6 . Metho d o f demonstratin g continuou s complianc e wit h D.E . Continuou s Paramete rMonitorin g Syste m a s require d b y th e permi t Parameter s monitore d are : Desorbe rBe d Pressur e Dro p t o b e les s tha n 5 in.wc . Desorbe rexhaus t tem p les s tha n 230°F , Minimu m Combustio n chambe rtemperatur e (Permi t require s minimu m o f 550°F , fo rcatalyti c oxydizer , w e no w maintai n 1400° F fo rtherma l oxydizer , Catalys t be d inle t temperatur e (N o longe rapplicable. )P.1 1

7 . Destructio n Efficienc y testin g requirement : Permi t renewa l and/o ra t mi d poin t o f permi t dependin g o n permi t languag e whe n issued . ADD-O N CONTRO L DEVIC E COS T DATA 1 . Add-o n contro l devic e capita l cos t an d yea ro f th e cos t data . $594,00 0 1995 . Included adsorbe r desnri w 2 . Instrumentatio n cost , freigh t cost , an d sale s tax : '• Instrumentatio n an d Freigh t ar e par t ofth e abov e costs . Sale s ta x abatemen t receive d fro m th e stat e o f Ohio , se e Ai rPollutio n Contro l Certificat e numbe r6294 . 3 . Electrica l Powe rconsumptio n an d cos t associate d wit h Add-o n contro l devic e (Est . 1996) : 10 0 h p mai n fa n 1 5 h o origina l fa n f prio r t o installing controls" ) Annual Electric : $28,36 0 1 boos t fa n fo r moldmaking 2 boos t fans fo r productio n lin

e 4 . Fue l usag e an d cost s associate d wit h add-o n contro l devic e _ .

_A . .„_,,„, , < Ne w oxidizer . Currentl y rate d a t 0.24MB H max . rwina l oxidize rf catalytic ) Run s a t approximat e 7/1 6 throttle : 0.10MB H h,H 7. 5 m mBT U burner Cost : $2.41/DT H $5.7 8 pe r dav . aDDro

x $127.2 5 pe r

mo . ("Thi s i s $2.4 1 pe

r m mBTU/hr

) 5 . Sit e preparatio n costs , an d buildin g cos t t o hous e contro l device : Foundatio n (Kreidler) : $432 6 Origina l charg e of

bonopor e Structur e & Housin g (Diamon dSteel) : $33,60 0 wa s 430 0 l b $37,92 6 6 . Contro l devic e maintenanc e costs , medi a replacemen t costs : Filters : 1 5 e a 6 time s pe ryea r@ $38.1 9 $343 7 pe ryea r Driv e belts : 2 e a 1 tim e pe ryea r@ $180.0 0 e a $36 0 pe ryea r Media : 10 0 pound s pe rmont h @ $28.00/ # $33,60 0 pe ryea r $37,39 7 pe ryea r Bonopor e i s grindin

g itself t o powde r an d must b e frequently replace d 

# AtoMicm' Standard ( 0P.1 2

7 . Overhead , propert y tax , insurance , an d administratio n cost s associate d wit h add-o n contro l device : Overhead : No t availabl e Propert y tax : No t availabl e Insurance : No t availabl e Administratio n Costs : No t availabl e 8 . Recor d keepin g an d reportin g time , cost s associated , lis t o f record s an d reports , an d tim e an d cost s t o prepar e same : Record s Tim e B y *Cost s Dail y productio n report 15min/da y WG M $3750/y r Dail y resi n usag e 15min/da y Resi n Mixe r$2625/y r Dail y man-hour s 15min/da y WG M $3750/y r ^ Dail y maintenanc e lo g 2 0 min/da y Millwrigh t $2625/y r & Quarterl y excursio n repor t 20mi n (varies)/Qt rEnv . Mg r$67/y r 3* KQuarterl y emissio n repor t 4 hpurs/Qt rEnv . Mgr . $800/y r Quarterl y productio n summar y 1 hour/Qt rEnv . Mg r$200/y r , , , . $13,817/y r Asteriskeditem s ar

e du e solel

v t o presenc e o f

add-o n contro l ( $ rate s est. ) WG M - $50/hr , R.M . & MW.-$35/hr , Env . Mgr-$50/h r CAPTUR E SYSTE M TECHNICA L DAT A 1 . Numbe ro f permanen t total enclosure s (PTE's ) tha t captur e HA P emission s 3 . Spra y an drollout boot h an d cur e oven , mol

dmakers booth , Naut amixe r 2 . Ca n th e entir e buildin g b e considere d a PT E base d o n Metho d 204 ?

, V , N o 3 . Lis t o f HA P emissio n point s capture d b y eac h PTE : Spra y & rollou t booth : 2 spra y guns , 4 tubs/trays/apron s Cur e oven : 1 6 tubs/trays/apron s Mol d maker s booth : 1 spra y gun , 1 tub/tray/apro n mol d Naut a mixe r 4 . Lis t o f HA P emissio n point s no t capture d b y PTE' s None . Resi n i s mixe d7 5 percen

t ofth e tim

e - the n pumpe d t o aholdin

g tank . Mixe di s vented , n

o openings , filler

addedi n manually . 

# I IP.1 3

5 . Dimension s o f eac h PT E Spra y & rollou t booth : 40 ' x 16 ' x T Cur e oven : 50 ' x 16 ' x 5-1/2 ' Mol d maker s booth : 16'x16'x8 ' Naut a Mixer : Machineitsejfisye ^

<* 3 <t>8 * x 12 ' con e truncate d a t 11 * (vol . = 20 0 Ft ) 6 . Dimension s o f natura l draf t opening s (NDO's ) an d fac e velocit y acros s each : Spra y & rollou t booth : Tu b entr y vestibule : 8 ' x 5 ' 28 2 FP M Tu b exi t 8 ' x 4 ' Cur e ove n Tu b entr y 16' x 5 ' 13 0 FP M Thi s wil l be rechecked . Tu b exi t 16' x 5 ' the y coul d chang e pulle y 

### or fa n t o reach 20 0 fp

m Mol d maker s booth : 12' x 2-1/12 ' 20 9 FP M Naut a Mixer : Non e 7 . Numbe ro f ai rchange s pe rminut e fo reac h PT E Spra y & rollou t booth : 0.22 0 mi n pe rai rchang e Cur e oven : 0.27 1 mi n pe rai rchang e Mol d maker s booth : 0.32 6 mi n pe rai rchang eP. M

Naut a Mixer : 0.26 3 mi n pe rai rchang e 8 . Measure d HA P concentratio n (ppm ) i n eac h PTE : Spra y & rollou t booth : Operato r# 1 7 8 ppm(8hrTWA ) Operato r# 2 1 4 pp m (8h rTWA ) Operato r# 3 1 8 pp m (8h rTWA ) Operato r# 4 4 0 pp m (8h rTWA ) 

### Test s wer e don e wit h collecto r

pump s Cur e oven : Mol d maker s boot h Naut a Mixer : No t measure d (n o operator ) 1. 2 pp m No t measure d (n o operator ) 9 . Numbe r& siz e o f an y permanentl y ope n door s o ran y othe ropening s i n th e PT E Spra y & rollou t booth : Non e Cur e oven : Non e Mol d maker s boot h Naut a mixe r 10 . Basi c PT E Materials : Non e Non e Spra y & rollou t booth : Galvanize d shee t stee l structure , Tempere d glas s Windows . Galvanize d shee t stee l structur e Cur e oven : Mol d maker s boot h Naut a mixer : Stainles s stee l plat e 11 . Basi c PT E safet y equipment : Spra y & rollou t booth : Fir e sprinkle rsystem . Cur e oven : Fir e sprinkle rsystem . Mol d maker s boot h Fir e sprinkle rsystem . Galvanize d shee t stee l structur e A littl e insulatio n 

### o n th e panel s

N o LE L monitor s



# \ 3P.1 5

Naut a mixe r None . 12 . Basi c Instrumentation : None . 13 . Louvers/Makeu p ai ruse d wit h PTE ? Spra y & rollou t booth : Cur e oven : Mol d maker s booth : Naut a mixe r Yes . No . No . No . rconditionin g use d wit h PTE ? Spra y & rollou t booth : Cur e oven : Mol d maker s booth : Naut a mixe r No . No . No . No . Fres h ai r hea t sourc e fo

r wintertime

15 . Doe s eac h PT E mee t EP A Metho d 204 criteri a fo ra PTE ? Spra y an drollou t boot h Ye s an d cur e ove n Mol d makers boot

h Ye s Naut aMixe

r Ye s 16 . Metho d o f demonstratin g continuou s complianc e wit h CE : e wrequiremen t Pressur e drop acros s syste

m Polya d operatio n logs . 17 . Captur e efficiency testin g requirement : ha s t o b e maintainedan dmonitored Permi t renewa l and/o ra t mi d poin t o f permi t dependin g o n permi t languag e whe n issued . CAPTUR E SYSTE M COS T DAT A 1 . Capita l cos t o f PTE' s an d yea ro f cos t data : Al l PTE' s $80,00 0 (1995 )



# AMMCOMSkwdardP.1 6

2 . Incrementa l operatin g & maintenanc e costs : Filte rreplacement : 39e a 2 x pe rweek , @ $1.50/filte r- $11 7 pe rweek , $585 0 pe ryea r 1 man-h rpe rchang e t o replac e b y operato r@ $25/h r- $5 0 pe rwee k $250 0 pe ryea r Total : $835 0 pe ryea r DUCTWOR KTECHNICA L DAT A 1 . Basi c ductin g material s befor e an d afte rcontro l devic e installation : Befor e installation : Galvanize d steel , spira l woun c . , , Di dno t chang e duc t

wor k Afte rinstallation : Painte d stee l whe n installe d control s 2 . Basi c ductin g configuratio n befor e an d afte rcontro l devic e installatio n (genera l configuration , length , diameter , locatio n o f tees , dampeners , elbow s & fan s q tt , . Befor e adde dcontro l jus t too k ven t throug h th e roo f Th e tu b productio n lin e hadthre e stacks . 3 . Ho w i s ductwor k

joine d prio rt o add-o n contro l device ? *' - ^* . , u » Sli p joints , w /

sheetmeta l screw s t o complet e th e connection . Al l ductwor k i s unde rnegativ e pressure . Al l ducts Joi n o n roo f t o rout e t o th e contro l devic e 4 . Measured/estimated/assume d velocit y o f ga s strea m i n ductwork : Measured : Spra y & rollou t booth : 143 9 FP M (north ) 205 6 FP M (south ) Cur e Oven : 168 1 FP M Mol d makers booth : 154 6 FP M Naut a mixer : 418 6 FP M

DUCTWOR KCOS T DATA 

# 15P.1 7



### 1 . Capita l cos

t t o retrofi t ductwor k

t o ven t emission s t o th e contro l devic e an d yea r of th e cost data : 

### $36,00 0 2 . Freigh t cos

t & sale s ta

x fo rductwor k

retrofit : No t broke n ou t 3 . Incrementa l electrica l powe rconsumptio n an d cos t associate d wit h duc

t fa n operatio n du e t o installatio n o f add-o n contro l device . 

### 2 1-1/ 2 H P motors , cos t

no t tracked . Booste

r fan s o n cur e ovens an dspra v booth . 4 . Incrementa l ductwor k

maintenanc e cost s du e t o installatio n of add-o n contro l device . Non e 5 . Incrementa l ductwor k

overhead , propert

y tax , insurance , an d administratio n cos t du e t o installatio n o

f add-o n contro l device : None .



# AtowicmStandard• • 03/17/0 0 08:4 7 FA X 1330337223 5 P. U 

### Attachmen t 2 

## jfotMicanStandard FA X TRANSMISSIO

N ifflui u

s-i , 'f i E ? 0 | ) § f -f

. TO : CO. : PHONE : FAX : DATE : Mr . Keit h Barnet t U.S . EP A 919-541-347 0 17-Mar-0 0 FROM :

CO : PHONE : FAX : PAGES : l

BillWelftoa

n i * AMERICA

N STANDAR

D INC . 605 S . ELLSWORT

H AVE . SALEM , O

H .44460 - 0Os332#5 & -• * 330-337-223 5 r 10n : MESSAGE : Keith - ^ | : Her e i s th e Octobe r10,199 7 tes t report showin g a destructio n efficiency o f 94.7 % W e ar e schedule d fo rth e 23 r d t o conduc t th e ne w efficienc y tests#©tf e Tigri s il^-0j|it# i Machug a o f Ohi o EP A foun d copie s o f findings an d order s signe d by u s (bu t prio rt o mylfehurejttha t Specif y tota l VO C D.E . tests . Ther e wer e n o copie s i n m y files . ? • * '" : So , w e ar e no w gearin g u p fo rmetho d 25 a tests . ; ' ' ] Th e finding s an d order s als o requir e captur e efficiency tests . VMwillno t b e abl e t o perfor m th e captur e efficiency test s concurren t wit h th e D.E . test s du e t o timin g o f the-testin g company . I hop 6 the y fin d tha t acceptable . I f yo u hav e an y question s le t m e know . Thanks , ; . * ** / ; ' * ; ; -'; '

*'f - i; 9::; f€: i->-, i S V



# \7p.1 9 03/17/0 0 08:4 7 FA X 1330337223 5 AME R STANDAR D ? |g]00 2 OCT-10-9 7 02:4 S P M OPTIMA L TEC H 4 1 2 828733 8 P. 0 2



### DRAF T • 1 DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY REPORT AMERICA

N STANDAR

D ^ SALEM , OHI O Octobe r 10,199 7

Projec tNo . 455-12*100 2

Prepare d for : America n Standar d 60 5 Sout h Ellswort

h Avenu e Salem , Ohi o 4446 0

Prepare d by: Optima l Technologies ; Incorporated 57 5 Willia

m PitdWa

y Pittsburgh , Pennsylvani a 1523 8 (412)828-733 0

\ «— P ? n 03/17/0 0 08:4 7 FA X 1330337223 5 AME R STANDAR D ^ wa OCT-16-9 7 82:3 0 P M OPTIMA L TEC H ,-41 2 828733 8 P.0 3 

### TABLE O F CONTENT S

a 1. 0 EXECUTIV E SUMMARY ;..' . iU U.—.- - 1 SUMMAR Y O F RESULT S ••• • - • 2 Ru n No . 1 » ~ • >1 Ru n No . 2 2 Ru n No . 3 ; =• 2 2. 0 TES T PROCEDURE S , ; . ... . 3 3. 0 QUALIT Y ASSURANC E , 4 ATTACHMENT S 1 . Sampl e Strea

m Flo w Calculation s an

d Total Hydrocarbon Analyze r Measurement s 2 . Fiel d Dat a Sheet s an d Proecs s Infonnatio n 3 . Quality Assuranc e 4 . Laborator

y Result s



# flP.2 1

U3/1Y/U U ua:4 B EA A Li 6US3I ZZZS AfflliKSTANUAK D j ig-rjU l OCT-10-9 7 02:5 8 P M OPTIMA L TEC H 41 2 828733 8 P - 0* * -S American Standard i . ^ 5 ; Saltm, OH

Facility y L. %i Ml

DRAFT

DG Report 

### 1.0 EXECUTIV

E SUMMAR

Y America n Standar doperate s a

n acryli c and fiberglass bathin g ves«) = manufacturin g facilit y i n Salem , Ohio . Durin g ihe - manufacturing , an

d coatin g processes , volatil e organi c compound s (VOCs ) either

evaporat e into th e ai

r o r arc driven ofl ' whilc4hsid e ovens . TS» e VOC s emitte db y thes e processe s ar

c collecte db

y hood s o r booth s an dar e directed.tojthe co$f6 l device . I t wa s th e intent

o f America n Standar dU J perfor mDestructio n Efficienc y (DF. ) testin g fo r th e bathin g vesse l manufacturin g proces s Une s a t it s Salem , O H facility.;The*puipos c o f D E testin g wa s t o determin e th e destructio n efficienc y ofth e capturedvolatil e organic ; compoun d(VOC ) emission s i

n the conlro l system(incinerator) . ? » - - . 'fit - i •

• %| - j - . « . Optima l Technologies , Inc . (Optimal ) wa s hire db y America n Standar dtojpcrfbr

mDestructio n Efficienc y (DE ) tesiin g a

t thi s facility . Thi s repor

t describe s specifi c les t

procedure s followe d durin g D E testin g o n America n Standard' s contro l device s WhcfC ! practical ; th e principal s o f Unite dState s Environmenta l Protectio n Agency (EPA) Mbthods r :2ithrough 4 wer e utilize dt o measure th e volumetri c flo w rale , oxyge

n (Oj) , carbon dioxide (COj) , an dmoisture conten t o f th e ga s streams . Optima

l performedD

E testin g utilizin g loUilihyd^carbor v (THC ) analyzer s wit

h flam e ionizatio n detector s (FIDs ) complying wit h the test s guideline s describe di n U.S . EPA' s Metho d25A , Determinatio n o f Tota l Caseou s Organi c Concentratio n Usint f aFlam e Ionizatio n Analvzer . Durin g th e D E testing , appropriat e process-line s wer

e operatin g under

require d conditions . Optima

l als o collecte done ga s strea msampl e fro

mthciinlc t

an doutle t fo r each tes t ru n to determin e methan e an daceton e concenlralions . Tedlar * bag s wer e usedt o contai n th e ga s strea msamples . 'Ili c sample s wer e sen t to tw o qualified--ai

r qualit y laboratories : fo

r analyse s o f methan e an

d aceton e content . The result s o f the analysi s enable dOptima l t o subtrac t

of f any methan e an

daceton e contributio n t

o FI D concentration output* . Th e averag e o f

thre e run s th e incinerator DE i s 94.7% . Al

l results are reporte da s propan e equivalent .



# ?£>—p? ? 03/17/0 0 08:4 8 FA A 13303372Z3 5 AME K STAISDAK1 ) . ^ *I r . ... „ IgJOUd OCT - ia-9 7 02:3 1 PM OPTIMA L TEC H 412.e28T3 ? 3 > P. 0 3 •- h \ American Standard ". . ; KSalmn, OH

Facility s l ?V. DRAFTDEReport SUMMAR Y O F RKSULT S R " " No - > Averag e Inle l Concentratio n (a s propane ) ~. ~ -.. . .«•.* • • 24 5 ppt n Averag e Outie tConcentratio n (a s propane ) ... » ..... . •••« } • ^ PP m Inle tMethan e Concentratio n (a s propane)....,*.;.. * ».,.« • "TM~ • 1- 5 pp m Outle tMethan e Concentratio n (a s propane) r .^..>.......;..: . ^j. 1. 2 pp m Inle tAceton e Concentratio n (a s propane ) ......L...........U ;;?.L....... i 18. 8 pp m Oulle tAceton e Concentratio n (a s propane)....:......... . .;. . 4. 8 pp m Destructio n Efficienc y (wit h methane/aceton e compensation ) .............................94.4 % Ru n Ntt . 2 Averag e Inle tConcentratio n (a s propane ) .-. LL... .UL . 24 8 pp m Averag e Outle tConcentratio n (a s propane)... . , 1 9 pp m Inle tMethan e Concentratio n (a s propane).....!.. . 'LL,,.. f.;.;.,....,,,. . 0. 6 pp m Outle tMethan e Concentratio n (a s propane).. , 1. 3 pp m Inle l Aceton e Concentratio n (a s propane ) ..... J ;..... . 3. 7 pp m Outle tAceton e Concentratio n (a s propane) : *sj ^ „-,.* . §.,.-. . ' 5. 5 pp m Destructio n Efficienc y (wit h methane/aceton e compensation ) ..............94.9 % R a n No . 3 Averag e Inle tConcentratio n (a s propane ) .* . 27 5 pp m Averag e Outle tConcentratio n (a s propane ) ,-«w...*.......f.i., : j..„. 1 ^y.„i,„., - 2 0 pp m Inlc tMethan e Concentratio n (a s propane)...vi...; . ,* „ j-.*. i 3. 6 pp m Outle tMethan e Concentratio n (a s propane). : .. ; .,.. ; ; : 4. 0 pp m Inle tAceton e Concentratio n (a s propane ) .^L,..........^.; ^.......... ; 2. 5 pp m Outle tAceton e Concentratio n (a s propane)..-.... . , 2. 4 pp m Destructio n Efllcicnc y (wit h methane/aceton e compensation ) ,;ui......—..............94.7 % Refe rt o Table s 1 an d 2 fo rth e D E calculation s a s wel l a s methan e an d aceton e concentrations .



# 2- 1: P.2 3

UJ/X//U U ua:4 B FA A UJUJ^^J D ASUIK SIAINUAKU nauu o OCT-18-9 7 02:5 2 P M OPTIMA L TEC H 41 2 e ^ 73 5 f P . 0 6 * /tmerteo n Srunt/arr

f ; Salam. OH

Facility is, ..il l

: DRAFTDFf

Report 

### 2. 0 TES T PROCEDURES - Thi s scctio n describe s specili c tes t procedure s followeddurin g prejiminap ?D E testing o n th e incinerator . Durin g th e D E testing , th e proces s line s wer e opersUih g at€il l capacity . Th e principal s o f

F.P A Method s 2 through 4 wer e utilized^measur e : th c voJumetri c flow rate , oxygen (O,) , carbo n dioxid e (C0 2 ) , an dmoistur e conten t ofrwic h oiih e fiv^iiilct

g& stream s an d th e singl e outlet

ga s streams . - L\ \- ; * f • ! " ff l S

f T o determin e th e DF. u f

th e incinerator , measuremen t of thennle t an doutle t (incinerated ) THC s too k plac e insid e th e ductwor

k , befor e an dafte r the incineratio n pipocss . ^Tw o TH C analyzer s wit h FID s wit

h heale dsampl e train s continuousl y measurcd

f th e THC s enterin g an dexitin g th e incinerator . Clea

n stainles s steel probe s wer e insertedinto th e ga s :?tiicam;f|(inle t an doutlet) an d attache dt o th e heale dsampl e line s (IISEs) . Tlii s samphn g procedur e followedth e principal s describe din GP

A Metho d25 A . Optima

l uUlixe dJU M Mddtl^E#JDK#jteroD/HS L sampl e trai n measure dth e THC s i n th e sample strea

mfro mthe inle t o f th e contro l device . Th e otiie r FID/HS L sampl e trai n measure dTHC s in ih e sampl e strea mexitin g theieutietlo f

th e contro l device . Th e concentration s wer e continuously measureda^rc-porac* ! ey||j r thirt y second s b

y a datalogger , Eac h FID wa s calibrate dto propane a s describe din lf e method . D E tes t

sampling , wa s performe dove

r thre e 1-hou

r .samplin g runs . Spreadsheet s ir

i Attachmen

t I lis t th e TH C emissio n concentration s fo r each les t run . Attachment s 2 and3 contai n th e fiel ddat asheet s an d qualit y assuranc e information , respectively . Tedlar * bag s were use dt

o collec t ga s strea msample s lob e analyze dfo r methan e an

daceton e content . Optimal sent

th e ga s sample s to experience dandflualifie 4 laboratorie s t o b c analyze d fo r methan e conten t

an dacetone . Th e sample s wer e analyze dwithin 7 2 hour s o f (collection . Th e ga s sample s wer

e analyze db

y ga s chromatograph

y (OC ) which ha s a

n FI D calibrate dwit

h methan e calibratio n gas . Optimal' s JU M Mode l VE 7 FED s hav e a43.21 % response facto r fo r methan e whe n calibrate dwit b propane . Therefore , concentration s of methan e (calibrate da s methane ) wil l b e converte dto a n "a s propane " respons e an dsubtracte dfro mth e averag e FID outputs . Optimal' s JU M Mode l VE 7 FID s hav e a120 % respons e factor for aceton e when calibrate dwit

h propane , Therefore , concentration s o f aceton e (calibrate da s acetone ) will b e convene dt o a n "a s propane " response andsubtracte dfro mIth e averag e FID outputs . Attachment

4 contain s laborator

y analyse s results . iU



# Zi-P.2 4 03/17/0 0 08:4 9 FA X 1330337223 5 AME RSTANDAR

D •>{>• @00 7 OCT-ia-9 7 02:5 2 P M OPTIMA L TEC H 41 2 8*2873^ 8 P . 0 T American Standard Salem, OH

Facility J DRAFT

DE Reptirt

3. 0 QUALIT Y ASSDR4^E | Oualit y assuranc

e o f th e FI D wa s determine

d b y inh«#^^ns.tff»p ^ bia s cheste , JKuHif tchecks , an d determinatio

n o f respons e ^ff^m^^ l Z testru

n wit h zer o ai r fro m a specialt

y ga s supplie r «^^ 1 t ^.^ r ^«^S?? I (low , middle , an

d hig h range ) of propane . Secondly , a sampl

e bi u ^.^Jf*^* J comparin g ihc calibratio

n ga s respons e throug h th e samplc^aw ^ 4ircc^wU^ c "^rwnent . R^ns e times for on

e sampl e line (pe r instrument

) wa s detennine

d prio r toahe firs

ttestru n an d needed . A tth

e en d o f eac h test, rsr o ai r an d on e representativ

e calibratio

n concentratio

n was Educe d t

o eac h FI D t o detennin

e calibratio

n drift . All , calibration ^ i s containe d i n Attachmen

t3 .



# 2 3. P.2 5 03/17/0 0 08:4 9 FA X 1330337223 5 AME RSTANDAR

D 1&00 8 0CT-10-9 T 02:5 3 P M OPTIMA L TEC H * 1 2 SS^TSS S



# TABLE S

V\03/17/0 0 08:4 9 FA X 1330337223 5 AME R STANDAR D OCT-10-9 7 02:5 3 P M OPTIMA L TEC H 4 1 2 628T33 8 P.2 6 lg|UU H P . 0 9 TABL E 1 1 H AMERICA

N STANDAR

D ; SALE M OW O FACILITV . ^ •.. DESTRUCTIO

N EFMC1ENC

Y TE6 T September 16,199 7 Destruction Effirkne j* RtrnKs* * I itl methane an

d aceton * rempMiattoa* 

### m^

• • : m tf II I IO I Poin t

Nim e Incinerato r Inlc t Incinerato r OulW i | |] ] 1 Incinerato r Inle l 1 IO I Incinerato

r Oulle l U l 10 1 VO C Deitruc t •^:;.*3Poi»it. J ... . if?fmu'....'s. 11 1 10 1 Incinerato r Inlc t i Incinerato

r Outlet " ion Efficiencie s Fro

m Eac h In t Po'nt Nam e Incinerato r Inlc t Incinerato r Ouile i II I Incinerato

r Inle t IO I Incinerato

r Outle t 

# 1 < " L l0 1 Incinerato r Inle t Incinerato r Outle t Tei t

Ru n 1 1 2 

### I ' 2 1 3 3 .inerato r (kg/kg • "* " -Test Ru n 1 1 

### "ctf f _Jg£l« ) 224 7 ll ' 243. 7 12.2 268. 5 13. 1

> C(Fj ) 219 . Ifl . 

## 1 T 1 2 23 6 " [ 3 | 26

2 1 3 1 1

3 C(DO), J

1 0. 6 

### J .' i '-.-» : 1 : 0. 4 • •'•&&&.': .

505 3 - » # 5<&5 25. 1 

## ...:S & .

49 4 24. 4

, 49 4 24. 4

- . . •::•-"-•?,j?*-r : |^-? ' vK^t** - ;.----y - :••':! * '•*- • JI 

### 1 .. . o.i ? : * : "*: !

. . ........... r ...... . 0 .738.1 8 0 <• 873.0 6 2~ [ ? »i.6 J 7 l S51.7

3 9 ? 7*4.4 :

. 0 . ; 847.3 :

- - . -i " • , . * : : 1

5 " j Stm\ * 49 4 |f : L-HM

i 24. 4 y.<cM

"•'. 219. 0 10.0 236J ] 11.7 | 262. 9 13. 0 

## ^lifc.;".' -

16 0 6 0 

## ' + : 

## mi : '. 1.83E-06 1.S3E-06 

### •y:.nm... :;

•.^•KWift " ••-•• •

17. 8 1. 0 Run # 1 DE*

= 94.4 % I ; f 6 0 l.B3E-00 | 21. 6

: | • « 1.83E-OO I I t Ru*a#2DE = 94.9 % t« » • 6 ( v j - s s

- '3. ? . . 1 I.83E-0 6 22. 6 ) 1.83K-0

6 1.

2 RonWDE - 94.7V . AVERAG E D E = WHERE : C(rj ) = correcte

d averag e VO C concentration

s o f emissions a

tpoin l j , pp m propan e • CQ) *** = coiTectc d (fo r mefnun

e an d ncewme ) averag e VO C concentration

s measure d appoin tj . pp m propan e . C(DO) = averag

e syste m dril l chee k concentratio

n fo r Mr o concentratio

n gas . pp m propan e C(n i I ) - • averag

e measure d concentratio

n for th e drif

tchec k calibratio

n fc.is, pp m propan e QH)*-actua l concentratio n o r ili c dril

l eittC k calibratio

n &s, pp m propan e -•

• * = i *

. \ \ C(fj ) [C(jVC{I)0)lx[lC(HVlC(l>Hl-C(DO)l l - I - F(BJ) - tota

l VO C conten

to f emission s fro

m poin tj , le g C(F.i)xQ(F.J)xT(F)xK.(1

) Q(Fj ) = averag

e elTloci H volumetric flo

w rat e correcte d to standar

d condition

s w poln^ , m3/miiv»dscft

n x 0.028 3 T(F ) = tota

l durntio n o f sampling run

. min. * K(l ) - 1.8 3 x 10E- 6 kn/(m3*ppm

) (factor fo r propane

) : e 94.7V .



# 1 503/17/0 0 08:4 9 FA X 1330337223 5 AME R STANDAR D OCT-10-9 7 02:5 4 P M OPTIMA L TEC H : * 1 2 S28T3yS 8 P.2 7 IgJUlU P . 1 0

TABLE 2 AMERICA

N STANDAR

D SALE M OHIO FACILIT

Y DESTRUCTIO

N EFNCIKNGvroS * September 16,l-HT/

v ; Destructio n Efficienc

y Results • methane an

d acetone conscntratkOM ^ FI D Respons e Facto n Methane -43 % Aceton e Ru n No . 1 Methan e Acetone Rv n No . 2 Methan e Acetone Ru n No . 3 Methan e Acetone =120 %

Concentratio

n (ppm ) Concentratio

n (ppnl ) Concentratio

n (ppm ) Concentratio

n (ppm ) Concentratio

n (ppm ) Concentraiio

n (ppm ) LvbReaults JS. M Propan e lntel«'A&itl«iftJ--lBl# I •• tOirtle t 3§i.4i.*52§| . 'H? ; ; 1 I- 2 

### mi 

### it * ? 

### 4. 8 V5i« g 1. 5 3. 1 8. 4 2. 1 3d * 4 * 2v0 * 3>

6 

# sm 1.

3 5. 5 4. 0 2. 4



### Zj ^P.2 8P.2 9



### AMERICA N STANDARD , INC . BUILDIN G &

< PRDPERT

Y 60 5 SDUT H ELLSVDRT H AVE . SALEM , DH 4446 0 SCALE : l'=24 ' 

# J

L CARG D ELEVATD R

L L



### 8- STAIR S

\ " 

### MA N ELEVATD R b l 

# 1

> C£ 

## •

L J 3 

# • 0 0



### J / MULLIN S STREE T 

# ^§ ^P.3 0

Emiaaio n Tea t Repor t 

### Attachmen t 4 America n Standard , In c

U.S.EP A Method s 2 4 4 0*Hm*«K) « o

f SlKf c O M Vatodty. VoUnatt c fkm Rrt . •n d Mows * Ccntv t TaMSni : Martca n Stvdv d EirtWenUN t POIYA D Sytta n

Procti a Informatio n SUMMAR Y RESULT S

Tes t Ru n Star t Tim e (hr:min) : Tes t Ru n Sto p Tim e (hr:min) : POO S 11:0 9 11:1 2 ES2

8 10:5 9 11-0 2 TMtDsto :

JobNuitx r North# 2 Roo e 10:4 3 10:4 9 V27/X

KOSOSA J Sout h # 1 ROO S 10:3 0 10:3 7 B21 S

10:3 0 10:4 1 Stac k Ga i Condition ! Averag e Stac k Ga s Temperatur e (ts ) (*F ) Averag e Stac k

Ga s Stati c Pressur e (ps ) O n H20 ) We t Volumetri c Stoc k Ga s Fio wa t Actua l Condition s (Qaw ) (acfm ) Dr y Volumetri c Stac k Ga s Flo wa t Standar d Condition s (Qstd ) (dscfm )

Averag e Stac k

Ga s Velocit y (Vs ) (ft/min) : Percen t b y Volum e Moistur e a s measure d i n Stac k Ga s (%H20 ) Nonna l Ai r Percen t b y Volum e Carto n Dioxid e i n Stac k Ga s (Dr y Basis ) ( % C02 ) Norma l Ai r Percen t b y Volum e Oxyge n i n Stac k Ga s (Dr y Basis ) (%02 ) Norma l A k

Percen t fay Volum e Carbo n Monoxid e i n Stac k Ga s (Dr y Basis ) (%CO ) Norma l Ai r Percen t b y Volum e Nitroge n i n Stac k Ga s (Dr y Basis ) (%N*2 ) Norma l Ai r Percen t b y Volum e Argo n i n Stac k Ga s (Dr y Basis ) (%Af ) 87.0 0 5.0 0 82 2 75 9 4.18 6 1.9 1 0.0 3 20.9 5 0.0 0 78.0 8 0.9 3 92.0 0

0.4 0 1,32 1 1.19 3 1,68 1 1.9 9 0.0 3 20.9 5 0.0 0 78.0 8 0.9 3 62.0 0

-0.9 7 9.07 2 8.33 2 1.43 9 1.8 4 0.0 3 20.9 5 0.0 0 78.0 8 0.9 3 78.0 0

-0.6 7 12.96 1 12,01 5 2.05 6 1.7 4 0.0 3 20.9 5 0.0 0 76.0 8 0.9 3 75.0 0

0.7 0 6.73 0 6.26 9 1,54 6 1.6 4 0.0 3 20.9 5 0.0 0 78.0 8 0.9 3 Tai t Result s Averag e Velocit y Pressur e (Delt a P ) (i n H20) : 1.04 4 0.16 6 0.17 1 0.35 2 0.14 4

AJrComptlanc*

Tnting

CONFIDENTIA L - 10/11/9 6 

# I ] 7Pj Pag e 1 5