alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 14, 2018

No. 04

- 16

- 00648

- CR

Darrel K. BOWSER

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR5005

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

This court heard oral argument in this appeal on February 28, 2018, and the appeal was

submitted. On March 7, 2018, A ppellant filed a motion to file a supplemental brief and the

supplemental brief itself.

Appellant’s motion to file a supplemental brief is GRANTED; the supplemental brief is

accepted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.7.

PER CURIAM

It is so ORDERE D on March 12, 2018

.

A TTESTED TO:

___________________________________

K eith E

. H ottle

Clerk of Court
#### Henry C. Spaulding, Respondent, v. The Equitable Assurance Society of the United States, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Hardin, P. J.
MARTIN O’MALLEY

GOVERNOR

STATE HOUSE

100 STATE CIRCLE ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND 21401-1925 (410) 974-3901 (TOLL FREE) 1-800-811-8336

TTY USERS CALL VIA MD RELAY STATE OF MARYLAND

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

January 16, 2013

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3 1650 Arch Street, 16 th Floor, 3RA00 Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029

Dear Mr. Garvin:

In accordance with the requirements of Section 107(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act, Maryland’s boundary recommendations under the 2012 annual fine particle (PM2.5) standard are provided

below in Table 1.

Maryland recommends that EPA designate all of Maryland as attainment with respect to the 2012 annual PM2.5 standard. Based upon the 2012 PM2.5 design values from Maryland’s air quality monitoring network, no counties in Maryland violate the 2012 annual primary and secondary PM2.5 standards. In making this recommendation, Maryland has utilized EPA’s “April 2013 Guidance for Area Designations fo r the 2012 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS” and reviewed the Five-Factor Analysis which includes: Air Quality Data, Emissions and Emissions-Related Data, Meteorology, Geography/Topography, and Jurisdictional Boundaries.

Maryland is pleased to submit this recommenda tion, as it represents the first designation

recommendation for either the PM2.5 or Ozone standards in which all of Maryland is in

attainment at the time of designation.

Table 1 summarizes the specific areas that Ma ryland is recommending be designated as in

attainment.

Table 1 Maryland’s Fine Particle Designation Recommendation

Designated Area Designation

Baltimore Area Anne Arundel County Attainment Baltimore City Attainment Baltimore County AttainmentMr. Shawn M. Garvin January 16, 2014 Page 2

Carroll County Attainment Harford County Attainment Howard County Attainment

Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton Area Cecil County Attainment

Washington DC Area Calvert County Attainment Charles County Attainment Frederick County Attainment Montgomery County Attainment Prin ce Georges County Attainment

Hagerstown – WV Panhandle Area Washington County Attainment

Remaining Maryland Counties Washington County Attainment Allegany Country Attainment Caroline County Attainment Dorchester County Attainment Garrett County Attainment Kent County Attainment Queen Anne’s County Attainment St. Mary’s County Attainment Somerset County Attainment Talbot County Attainment Wicomico County Attainment Worcester County Attainment

Maryland recognizes that this boundary recomme ndation submittal is only the first step in the fine particle designation pro cess, and looks forward to working with EPA and Maryland stakeholders during the final step s of the designation process.

If you have any questions about this submission, please do not hesitate to contact Robert M. Summers, Secretary of the Mary land Department of Environm ent at (410) 537-3086 or George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director, Air and Radia tion Management Admini stration at (410) 537-3245.

Sincerely,

Governor

cc: Mr. Robert M. Summers, Mary land Department of the Environment
i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
22
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
OSS-is

ELECTRONIC RECORD

CCA # 09-13-00104-CR OFFENSE: Official Oppression

STYLE: Daniel Diaz v. The State of Texas PUNISHMENT: 1 year county jail

COUNTY: Liberty

TRIAL COURT: 253rd District Court

TRIAL COURTS: CR29411

TRIALCOURT JUDGE: Judge Chap B. Cain III

DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED

Appellant's MOTION

FOR REHEARING IS: OVERRULED

DATE: 12-10-14

JUDGE: PER CURIAM

DATE: 12-10-14

JUSTICE: LeanneJohnson PC NO S YES

PUBLISH: NO DNP: YES

CLK RECORD: 04-11-13 SUPP CLK RECORD:

RPT RECORD: 05-29-13

STATE BR: 01-21-14

SUPP RPT RECORD: 09-27-13

SUPP BR:

APP BR: 12-03-13 PRO SE BR:

035-15

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

ELECTRONIC RECORD CCA # PD-0035-15

A??ELIAN^Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

DATE: Odlltf/z-O/jr

JUDGE: fHA U^VUi^-

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS:

CCA IS: ON

JUDGE:

ON

JUDGE:
1210-AB32-2-1552.html[7/26/2015 7:33:54 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 11, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jx4-4tm9

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2049

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

 I can take care of my own retirement planning. I do not need and do not want the federal government to do this

 for me. I do not want this proposed employee benefits security administration rule.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23-2-1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-6879 and 33-51379) and on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-33847) of Commonwealth Edison Company and Subsidiary Companies of our
report dated January 29, 2002, except for Note 19 for which the date is March
21, 2002, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule,
which appears in this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chicago, Illinois
April 1, 2002
Exhibit 24.12



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, John W. Rogers, Jr. do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and
on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2005 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all
things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



/s/ John W. Rogers, Jr.John W. Rogers, Jr.






DATE: February 13, 2006
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.01

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
Citicorp:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Citicorp on Form S-3: Nos. 333-50338, 33-59791, 33-64574, 333-14917, 333-20803,
333-21143, 333-32065 and 333-83741; and of Citicorp Mortgage Securities, Inc.,
Citibank, N.A., and other affiliates, on Form S-3: Nos. 333-72082, 33-66222,
333-43167, and 333-72459, and on Form S-11: Nos. 33-48263, 33-6358, and
33-36313, of our report dated February 24, 2003 with respect to the consolidated
statement of financial position of Citicorp and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statement of
financial position of Citibank, N.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002
and 2001, which report is included in the annual report on Form 10-K of Citicorp
for the year ended December 31, 2002. Our report refers to changes, in 2002, in
Citicorp's methods of accounting for goodwill and intangible assets, and, in
2001, in Citicorp's methods of accounting for derivative instruments and hedging
activities, accounting for interest income and impairment on purchased and
retained beneficial interests in securitized financial assets, and accounting
for goodwill and intangible assets resulting from business combinations
consummated after June 30, 2001.


/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 18, 2003
#### The Lancaster Trust Company, Appellant, *v.*Albert H. Flint, Respondent, Impleaded with Another.

*Lancaster Trust Co.*v. *Flint,*131 App. Div. 901, affirmed.

(Argued November 22, 1910;

decided December 6, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 26, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover on a contract of underwriting.

*Romeyn Berry*and *Frank L. Crocker*for appellant.

*Myron N. Tompkins*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
#### § 374.503 Authority.

Motor carriers transporting passengers, in interstate or foreign commerce, over regular routes authorized in a certificate issued as a result of an application filed before January 2, 1967, may transport special or chartered parties, in interstate or foreign commerce, between any points and places in the United States (including Alaska and Hawaii). The term “special or chartered party” means a group of passengers who, with a common purpose and under a single contract, and at a fixed charge for the vehicle in accordance with the carrier's tariff, have acquired the exclusive use of a passenger-carrying motor vehicle to travel together as a group to a specified destination or for a particular itinerary.
§ 380.205 LCV Triples. ( a ) To qualify for the training necessary to operate an LCV Triple, a driver-student shall, during the 6 months immediately preceding application for training, have: ( 1 ) A valid Class A CDL with a double/triple trailer endorsement;
( 2 ) Experience operating the vehicle listed under paragraph (a)(2)(i) or (a)(2)(ii) of this section. Evidence of driving experience shall be an employer's written statement that the driver has, during the 6 months immediately preceding application, operated the applicable vehicle(s): ( i ) Group A truck-tractor/semi-trailer combination as described in § 383.91 of this subchapter; or
( ii ) Group A truck-tractor/semi-trailer/trailer combination that operates at a gross vehicle weight of 80,000 pounds or less;
( 3 ) No more than one driver's license;
( 4 ) No suspension, revocation, or cancellation of his/her CDL;
( 5 ) No convictions for a major offense, as defined in § 383.51(b) of this subchapter, while operating a CMV;
( 6 ) No convictions for a railroad-highway grade crossing offense, as defined in § 383.51(d) of this subchapter, while operating a CMV;
( 7 ) No convictions for violating an out-of-service order, as defined in § 383.51(e) of this subchapter;
( 8 ) No more than one conviction for a serious traffic violation, as defined in § 383.5 of this subchapter, while operating a CMV; and
( 9 ) No convictions for a violation of State or local law relating to motor vehicle traffic control arising in connection with any traffic crash, while operating a CMV.
( b ) Driver-students meeting the preliminary requirements in paragraph (a) of this section shall successfully complete a training program that meets the minimum unit requirements for LCV Triples as set forth in Appendix F to this part.
( c ) Driver-students who successfully complete the Driver Training Program for LCV Triples shall be issued a certificate, in accordance with subpart D of this part, indicating the driver is qualified to operate an LCV Triple.
[69 FR 16732, Mar. 30, 2004, as amended at 83 FR 22874, May 17, 2018]
Exhibit 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-21900, 33-34205 and 
33-59275, and 33-54817) of Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. of our report
dated February 14, 1996 which appears on page 15 of the 1995 Annual Report to
Shareholders of Chris-Craft Industries, Inc., which is incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1995 and our report dated February 14, 1996 on the financial statements
of United Paramount Network appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  


PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

New York, New York
March 29, 1996
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 315 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 110
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 315

                          [Report No. 107-336]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
    bill (H.R. 1) to close the achievement gap with accountability, 
       flexibility, and choice, so that no child is left behind.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

            December 13 (legislative day, December 12), 2001

Ms. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
    bill (H.R. 1) to close the achievement gap with accountability, 
       flexibility, and choice, so that no child is left behind.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1) 
to close the achievement gap with accountability, flexibility, and 
choice, so that no child is left behind. All points of order against 
the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The 
conference report shall be considered as read.

                                                 House Calendar No. 110

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 315

                          [Report No. 107-336]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
    bill (H.R. 1) to close the achievement gap with accountability, 
       flexibility, and choice, so that no child is left behind.

_______________________________________________________________________

            December 13 (legislative day, December 12), 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
From: William Carter [mailto:wpcarter_98@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 1:03 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: My financial surprise.

Mr. Perez I am currently dealing the aftermath of a recharacterization. After doing some 

research I thought doing this was a good idea at the time since I tried to convert too 

much Tradional IRA into my Roth IRA. The way it has turned out I would never advise 

anyone To try this maneuver . Even though at the present time I am a Vanguard 

Voyage investor when I am my tax prepare tried to get to the bottom of how Vanguard 

handled my recharacterization boy did I get a surprise. I thought since I had some real 

money invested with Vanguard I would get great service, what I ended up getting was 

the standard line on the statements and tax forms available online. I did go into the 

website and print everything out I could find on my recharacterization and I then made 

copies for my tax preparer. What really took back was when my tax preparer suggested 

I get a broker to handle dealing with my mutual fund companies since I ended up doing 

all the research and printing myself. This whole experience of dealing with the IRS and 

myMain Mutual Fund Company has really been a learning experience for me. 

 

 Yours Truly 

 

William P. Carter
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF **

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER **

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1. | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31,                2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for                the period ending March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                Benda Pharmaceutical, Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 1, 2008                                |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |
| */s/                Yiqing Wan*                                    |
| Yiqing                WanPresident,                CEO andDirector |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-548

In Re: W. A. MACGUIRE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-96-1235-A)

Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: June 17, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

W. A. MacGuire, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1 In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987).

2 Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 309

(1989).

3 In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.

1979).

2

PER CURIAM:

William A. MacGuire filed a mandamus petition in this court

after the district court denied his application for a temporary

restraining order, preliminary injunction, and permanent injunction

against the Secretary-Treasurer of the Virginia Board of Bar Examiners. Finding that the facts and claims of this action have been

repeatedly addressed by state and federal courts, the district

court dismissed the action on the grounds of res judicata and

collateral estoppel. Essentially, MacGuire appeals the district

court's decision.

The granting of the writ is a drastic remedy and should only

be granted in extraordinary situations.1 MacGuire must show that he

has no other avenue for relief and that his right to relief is

clear and undisputable.2 MacGuire fails to meet his burden, and

mandamus relief cannot be used as a substitute for appeal. 3

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, we deny the motion to view the entire case file, and deny

the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
3

PETITION DENIED
|   | 1. | The      Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 4, 2009,      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof      (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Mason N. Carter                         |
|--------------------------------------------------|
| Mason      N. Carter                             |
| Chief      Executive OfficerAugust 17,      2009 |

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 193

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

#### § 193.2119 Records

Each operator shall keep a record of all materials for components, buildings, foundations, and support systems, as necessary to verify that material properties meet the requirements of this part. These records must be maintained for the life of the item concerned.
###### Editorial Note on Part 385

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 385.1019 Service and computation of time.

Service of documents and computations of time will be made in accordance with §§ 386.6 and 386.8 of this subchapter. All documents that are required to be served or filed must be served or filed with a certificate of service.
1210-AB32-2-1535.html[7/26/2015 7:10:21 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwr-p18w

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2032

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

To the EBSA,

I understand you desire to further regulate what I plan to do with my 401K and IRA. This is my money and any

 influence beyond what is already is in place is not necessary and takes away my freedom to do what I want with

 my own money I have earned. The government can do better at not spending beyond what it takes in and not

 keep taking money we need to retire on. I urge you not to take further measures that reduce or regulate the

 money we earn.