alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, William C. Niegsch, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Max & Erma’s Restaurants,Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):
22

 
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: March 28, 2007                                                   /s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr.   William C. Niegsch, Jr.,  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof Max & Erma’s Restaurants, Inc.  
23
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1357.html[7/23/2015 6:18:05 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvk-98fo

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1357

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: PATRICK SIDENER

Address:

2942 N. 24TH ST.

SUITE 108

PHOENIX, AZ, 85016

Email: patricksidener@gmail.com

Phone: 6186983378

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan for my own retirement!

There is no reason why the Government should be allowed to tell me how to spend my retirement money, or tell

 me how to invest it for retirement! I urge you to vote against any regulations for restricting how Americans

 spend their retirement money.
1210-AB32-2-1143.html[7/24/2015 6:36:46 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-qp5d

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1637

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

WE NEED LESS GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN OUR LIVES, NOT MORE! Keep your hands

 (regulations) away from our retirement investments.
§ 375.503 Must I write up an inventory? ( a ) You must prepare a written, itemized inventory for each shipment of household goods you transport for an individual shipper. The inventory must identify every carton and every uncartoned item that is included in the shipment. When you prepare the inventory, an identification number that corresponds to the inventory must be placed on each article that is included in the shipment.
( b ) You must prepare the inventory before or at the time of loading in the vehicle for transportation in a manner that provides the individual shipper with the opportunity to observe and verify the accuracy of the inventory if he or she so requests.
( c ) You must furnish a complete copy of the inventory to the individual shipper before or at the time of loading the shipment. A copy of the inventory, signed by both you and the individual shipper, must be provided to the shipper, together with a copy of the bill of lading, before or at the time you load the shipment.
( d ) Upon delivery, you must provide the individual shipper with the opportunity to observe and verify that the same articles are being delivered and the condition of those articles. You must also provide the individual shipper the opportunity to note in writing any missing articles and the condition of any damaged or destroyed articles. In addition, you must also provide the shipper with a copy of all such notations.
( e ) You must retain inventories for each move you perform for at least one year from the date you made the inventory and keep it as an attachment to be made an integral part of the bill of lading contract.
[68 FR 35091, June 11, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 10576, Mar. 5, 2004]
Exhibit 10.44

AMENDMENT NO. 1TO 1993 STOCK OPTION PLANOFALFACELL CORPORATION

Pursuant to Section 17 of the 1993 Stock Option Plan (the 1993 Plan) of Alfacell Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the Company), the 1993 Plan is hereby amended by deleting Section 11 and replacing it with the following:

No Option granted under the Plan is transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order as defined by the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended or Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act or the rules thereunder. During the holders lifetime, an Option may only be exercised by the holder or, in the event of his legal incapacity to do so,
the holders guardian or legal representative. Upon the holders death an Option may be exercised by the executors, administrators, legatees, or heirs of such Participants estate.

Notwithstanding the foregoing restriction on transferability, all or any portion of the Existing Options of Ms. Kuslima Shogen, as the term Existing Options is defined in the
Retirement Agreement dated April 25, 2008 between the Company and Ms. Shogen, may be transferred by Ms. Shogen to a Family Member or Family Members of hers, as the term Family Members is defined in the General Instructions to Form S-8 of
the Securities and Exchange Commission (or successor to such Instructions or such Form), at any time that Ms. Shogen holds the Existing Options to be transferred, provided that Ms. Shogen may not receive any consideration for such transfer, and any
such Family Member may not make any subsequent transfers of such Existing Options other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution and the Company receives prior written notice of such proposed transfer.

For all purposes of this Amendment, capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meaning specified in the 1993 Plan.

This Amendment was approved by the Board of Directors of the Company pursuant to Section 17 of the 1993 Plan and, unless otherwise expressly indicated herein, shall be construed, administered
and applied in accordance with all the terms and provisions of the 1993 Plan. Except as expressly amended or waived by the terms of this Amendment, the terms and conditions of the 1993 Plan shall remain unamended and unwaived. The amendment set
forth herein shall be limited precisely as provided for herein to the provision expressly amended herein and shall not be deemed to be a waiver of, amendment of, consent to or modification of any other term or provision of any other document or any
transaction or further action on the part of the Company.

This Amendment shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the Company and its respective successors and assigns. In the event of any conflict between any of the terms of any stock option
agreement with respect to Ms. Shogens Options granted under the 1993 Plan, the terms of the 1993 Plan, as amended hereby, shall control.

Adopted by the Board of Directors April 16, 2008

---
#### WILLIAM HENNING & CO. v. UNITED STATES.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

February 6, 1912.)

No. 2,301.

Food (.§ 15*) — Adulteration—Misbranding.

Where pumpkin was added, to tomato catsup as a filler, the fact that it was merely marked "Compound,” without anything on the labels under which it was sold to show the substances composing the compound, did not constitute a compliance with the food and drugs act (Act June 30, 1908, c. 3915, 34 Stat. 708 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1909, p. 1187]).

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Food, Dec. Dig. § 15.*

What constitutes a violation of pure food regulations, see note to Brina v. United States, 105 C. C. A. 559.]

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern ■ District- of Louisiana.

Condemnation proceedings by the United States against a quantity of tomato catsup, alleged to be adulterated, in which William Henning & Co. appeared as claimants. From a judgment of condemnation, claimants bring error.

Affirmed.

Scott E. Beer and Edward M. Robbert (Lannen & Hickey, of counsel), for plaintiffs in error.

Charlton R. Beattie, U. S. Atty. (Louis H. Burns, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief), for the United States.

Before PARDEE and McCORMICK, Circuit Judges, and MAX-EY, District Judge.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, *&*Rep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

Conceding in this case that the addition of pumpkin to tomato catsup as a filler results in an article that may be described as a compound, still the food and drugs act requires that such article must be labeled, branded, or tagged so as to plainly indicate the substances composing the compound, and it is not a compliance with the act to merely mark the word “Compound” on the package.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J O SE M A RI A M ERA Z- V A RG A S, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 11- 10155 D . C. N o . 4 : 0 9 - c r - 0 2 8 1 7 - D CB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona D a vi d C . B ury , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J une 26, 2012 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , H A W K IN S , an d G O U L D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jose M ar i a M er az -V ar gas app ea l s f rom the 46 -m on th sent ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for r ee ntryaf t erdepo rt at i on , i n v i ol at i on of 8 U . S. C. § 1 3 2 6 . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n d w e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED JU N 29 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 10155 2 M e r a z - V a r ga s c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc our te rr e d by appl y i ng a n e rr one ous st andard for grant i ng a departure or vari ance . H e a l so cont ends thatthe di stri ct c our tf a i l e d t o c ons i de ra l l of

the 18 U . S . C . § 3553( a ) s e nt e nc i ng f a c t or s . T he reco rd b el i es th ese co n t en t i o n s. M er az -V ar gas nextcont ends thatthe di stri ctcourterre d b y f ai l i ng t o aw ar d a thi rd po i ntfor a cc ept ance of re spon si bi l i ty. T hi s a rgum entfa i l s bec ause M er az V ar gas has no tshow n thatthe go vernm ent ’ s r ef usal t o m ov e f

or the thi rd po i ntw as a rb itr a ry o rb a s e d o n a n u n c o n s titu tio n a l m o tiv e . Se e U ni te d State s v . J

ohns on , 5 8 1 F .3 d 9 9 4 , 1 0 0 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . M e r a z - V a r g a s f

in a lly c o n te n d s th a t h is s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e ly unr e a s onabl e be c a us e the di s tr i c tc our tdi d notgi ve s uf f i c i e ntw e i ghtt o m i t i ga t i ng f a c t or s a nd f

a i l e d t o gr a ntade pa r tur e orva r i a nc e on the gr ound tha tthe s e r i ous ne s s of

hi s pr i orc onvi c t i on w a s ove r s t a t e d oron a ny othe rba s i s . I n l i ghtof th e to ta lity o f

th e c ir c u m s ta n c e s a n d th e s e n te n c in g f a c to r s s e t f

o r th in 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) , th e w ith in - G u id e lin e s s e n te n c e is r e a s o n ab le . See G al l v. U ni ted Stat es , 5 5 2 U .S . 3 8 , 5 1 ( 2 0 0 7 ) ; s e e al s o U ni te d State s v . D al lm an , 5 3 3 F .3 d 7 5 5 , 7 6 1 ( 9 th C i r . 2008) ( f

a i l ur e t o gr a ntade pa r tur e i s r e vi e w e d a s pa r tof the s ubs t a nt i ve re as on abl enes s of the se nt ence ). AF F I RME D.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/18/15 9:53 PM

Received: July 15, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jzy-ht51

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2367

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Nancey McMurtry

Address: United States,

Email: nmcmurt@hotmail.com

Phone: 407-678-7740

General Comment

DOL,

I retired from the securities industry approximately 18 months ago. I have IRA accounts and 

even though I was a qualified investment professional I have worked with another qualified 

investment professional to consult with to manage my accounts. I neither require nor want your 

assistance to handle my investments nor those of my husband. IRA's were meant for the 

individual to be able to make his own decisions with his retirement monies. The government's 

track record with managing Social Security funds does not recommend that it has any expertize 

in this area. Leave our IRA and 401-K retirement fund decisions to the individuals who earned 

the money. No help wanted from the government.
SUPREME COURT.

#### Clark agt. Campbell *et al.*

*Venue—Motion to change place of trial—Laches—Sections*986 *and*987, *Code of Oivil Procedure.*

A motion to change place of trial may be made by the defendant ten days after the expiration of the five days given plaintiff to consent to the change, fifteen days after the demand has been made by defendant *(Gode of Giml Procedure, sea.*986).

*Quaere.*Where the defendant neglects to make the motion until two months after demand, and until after the cause has been noticed for trial in the county where the venue was laid, can the motion be successfully opposed on the ground of laches?

*It seems,*that under the provisions of section 987 the court has the power to change the place of trial, on the ground that the county where the venue is laid is not the proper county, when all the parties reside in the county to which it proposed to change the place of trial, and the transactions took place there, though the defendant has allowed two months to elapse since the service of his demand.

*New York*Chambers, November, 1877.

Motion to change place of trial.

The action is brought on a promissory note and the defense is payment. This motion is made to change the place of trial from New York to Washington county as the proper county, the transaction having taken place there and the parties residing in that county. A demand was served with the answer on the 15th day of August, 1877, and this motion noticed October 25, 1877, more than two months after demand and after the cause had been noticed for trial in New York county. Plaintiff opposed the motion, on the ground of *167laches, as under the Code of Civil Procedure *{sec.*986) this motion must he made ten days after the expiration of the five days given plaintiff to consent to the change, or in all fifteen days after the demand has been made by defendant.

*George P. Sheldon,*defendants’ counsel, for motion.

*Charles G. Cronin,*plaintiff’s counsel, opposed.

Lawrence, *J.*

The plaintiff and two (if not all three) of the defendants reside in the county of Washington. That was, therefore, the proper county for the trial of the action when commenced. Even if, under section 986 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the defendants cannot, as matter of right, claim that the cause should be sent to Washington county for trial, I am of opinion that under the provisions of section 987 the court has the power to change the place of trial on the ground that New York is not the proper county, and as the parties reside in Washington county and the transactions took place there it would appear to be a proper exercise of the power vested in the court to send the case to the last named county for trial. The motion is therefore granted, but as some of the points involved arise under the new Code, and may not be free from doubt, no costs are allowed.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 890 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 890

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to exempt amounts owed for 
  prescription drugs and medical supplies dispensed by Department of 
Veterans Affairs pharmacies from otherwise applicable interest charges 
 and administrative cost charges imposed on indebtedness to the United 
States resulting from the provision of medical care or services by the 
                    Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2001

 Mrs. Mink of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to exempt amounts owed for 
  prescription drugs and medical supplies dispensed by Department of 
Veterans Affairs pharmacies from otherwise applicable interest charges 
 and administrative cost charges imposed on indebtedness to the United 
States resulting from the provision of medical care or services by the 
                    Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF AMOUNTS OWED FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUGS AND MEDICAL 
              SUPPLIES DISPENSED BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              PHARMACIES FROM OTHERWISE APPLICABLE INTEREST CHARGES AND 
              ADMINISTRATIVE COST CHARGES.

    (a) Exemption.--Section 5315(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended by inserting ``(other than an indebtedness resulting from 
the provision of prescription drugs or medical supplies by a Department 
pharmacy)'' after ``of this title''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the first day of the first month beginning on or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to 
charges for months beginning on or after that date, regardless of when 
an indebtedness was incurred.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                               6
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      415
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        304
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   758
<PP&E>                                              51
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              310
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           141
<OTHER-SE>                                         223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       827
<SALES>                                            574
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   574
<CGS>                                              266
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   210
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     98
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 98
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        98
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        


</TABLE>