alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-11935

 

 

CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX,LP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 124, AFL-CIO.

No. 16070.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Sept. 2, 1958.

Thomas J. McDermott, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

Order of National Labor Relations Board enforced, on petition for enforcement and stipulation filed with Board.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 164 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 12, 2001.
    Resolved, That on the Committee on Science Mr. Gilchrest shall rank after 
Mrs. Biggert.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.227 May employers use the ATF for non-DOT tests, or non-DOT forms for DOT tests? ( a ) No, as an employer, BAT, or STT, you are prohibited from using the ATF for non-DOT alcohol tests. You are also prohibited from using non-DOT forms for DOT alcohol tests. Doing either subjects you to enforcement action under DOT agency regulations.
( b ) If the STT or BAT, either by mistake, or as the only means to conduct a test under difficult circumstances (*e.g.,* post-accident test with insufficient time to obtain the ATF), uses a non-DOT form for a DOT test, the use of a non-DOT form does not, in and of itself, require the employer or service agent to cancel the test. However, in order for the test to be considered valid, a signed statement must be obtained from the STT or BAT in accordance with § 40.271(b) .
Monthly State Retail Sales for December 2023

Overview

The U.S. Census Bureau introduced the Monthly State Retail 

Sales (MSRS) report as an experimental data product in 

September 2020. The MSRS is a blended data product 

combining Monthly Retail Trade Survey data, administrative 

data, and third-party data. Year-over-year percentage changes 

are available for Total Retail Sales excluding Nonstore Retailers 

as well as 11 North American Industry Classification System 

(NAICS) retail subsectors. These data are provided by state and 

NAICS beginning in January 2019. We will publish these data 

monthly on an ongoing basis and seek ways to improve the 

methodology whenever possible.

Total Retail Sales

Total U.S. Retail Sales excluding Nonstore Retailers (not 

seasonally adjusted) in December 2023 were up 1.5 percent 

(±0.5 percent) from December 2022.

Five states had positive and significant year-over-year 

percentage changes from December 2022 to December 2023.

Released March 28, 2024
Retail sales for Gasoline Stations (not seasonally adjusted) 

for the United States in December 2023 were down 7.4 

percent (±0.7 percent) from December 2022.

Thirty-nine states had negative and significant year-overyear percentage changes from December 2022 to 

December 2023.

Retail sales for Health and Personal Care Stores (not 

seasonally adjusted) for the United States in December 

2023 were up 8.7 percent (±0.5 percent) from December 

2022.

Forty-five states and the District of Columbia had positive 

and significant year-over-year percentage changes from 

December 2022 to December 2023.

Gasoline Stations (NAICS 447)

Health and Personal Care Stores (NAICS 446)

To view additional NAICS and state-level data in an interactive data visualization, please visit https://www.census.gov/

retail/state_retail_sales.html .
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 176 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 21, 2001.
    Resolved, That on the Committee on Resources, Mr. Hayworth of Arizona shall 
rank after Mr. Tancredo of Colorado.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

1386 U.S. 738 (1967).

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No.97-10089

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANDRE DEMOND JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:96-CR-240-D

October 8, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

 PER CURIAM:*

Counsel for Andre Demond Jackson, who pled guilty to a charge of

distribution of cocaine base, has filed a brief in compliance with Anders v.

California.

1

 The required independent review of the brief, Jackson’s response, and
2

the record reveal no nonfrivolous issue available to be pressed on appeal.

Accordingly, the motion of counsel to be relieved from further responsibilities

herein is GRANTED and Jackson’s request for appointment of a new appellate

attorney is DENIED.

The appeal is DISMISSED.
From: Dee K. Carter [mailto:dkcart@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 2:22 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Dear Sir or Madam:

I am writing to express my concern regarding the proposed rule concerning Conflict of Interest. I live in 

a small town (125,000) and have been serving the retirement needs of my clientele here for nearly 40 

years. I have built up a nice practice and do a weekly 30 minute radio program on retirement planning, 

with a focus on distribution and guaranteed lifetime income. A large percentage of my clientele over 

the past 40 years are retirees who are seeking assistance in rolling over their 401-K’s into a plan that 

they cannot out-live and one that will provide safety, not only for them, but also for their families after 

their death. We spend a good bit of time in determining their risk tolerance, their need for liquidity, 

their financial and tax status and their investment objectives. Once these matters are established, and, 

usually after two or three meetings, we provide them the appropriate financial vehicles to help them 

meet their retirement goals. I receive commissions from the companies with which I work and with 

which I place the business for my client. I have clientele that I have assisted in reaching their retirement 

goals and I am not working with the children of those clients. I have earned their trust by the service 

that we have given to their parents and the friends of their parents over the years. Under the proposed 

Rule, I will be prohibited from assisting these people and they will be at the mercy of others whom I feel 

are not nearly as concerned about the clients’ future welfare as they are about the fees that they can 

charge. What is worse, if the client cannot afford the fees, they may try to take matters into their own 

hands, thus incurring taxation about which they are unaware or paying surrender charges that they 

might otherwise avoid.

This situation is NOT unusual. They are far more representatives doing what I am doing in small to 

medium size markets around the Country than you may realize. Hopefully, you will take another look at 

the Proposed Rule with the small to medium investor in mind.

Thank you for your consideration.

Dee K. Carter, CLU, ChFC, RFC

1030 Andrews Hwy., Ste. 105

Midland, Texas 79701

432-685-1372
##### 



Exhibit 32.B Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004, of
El Paso CGP Company (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, D. Dwight Scott, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ D. Dwight ScottD. Dwight ScottExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) April 15, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Paso
CGP Company and will be retained by El Paso CGP Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2112

TISHISA BRAZIEL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHARLESTOWN OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.; DUANE INGALSBE; JEFF 

BIERY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, 

District Judge. (1:15-cv-00718-AJT-IDD)

Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 25, 2016

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tishisa Braziel, Appellant Pro Se. Wayne F. Cyron, James Gerard 

Smalley, CYRON & MILLER, LLP, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tishisa Braziel appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing her civil action alleging claims under the Fair 

Housing Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Braziel v. Charlestown Owners Ass’n, No. 1:15-

cv-00718-AJT-IDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2015). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for
the periods presented in the Report.
   /s/ J.J. FinkelsteinJ.J. FinkelsteinPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Editorial Note on Part 391
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 391 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 391.13 Responsibilities of drivers. In order to comply with the requirements of §§ 392.9(a) and 383.111(a)(16) of this subchapter, a motor carrier shall not require or permit a person to drive a commercial motor vehicle unless the person— ( a ) Can, by reason of experience, training, or both, determine whether the cargo he/she transports (including baggage in a passenger-carrying commercial motor vehicle) has been properly located, distributed, and secured in or on the commercial motor vehicle he/she drives;
( b ) Is familiar with methods and procedures for securing cargo in or on the commercial motor vehicle he/she drives.
[63 FR 33277, June 18, 1998, as amended at 80 FR 59074, Oct. 1, 2015]
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 224

Honoring the New Jersey State Law Enforcement Officers Association.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 2001

Mr. FERGUSON (for himself, Mr. SAXTON, Mrs. ROUKEMA, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, Mr. HOLT, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. ANDREWS, and Mr. LOBIONDO)

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Honoring the New Jersey State Law Enforcement Officers

Association.

Whereas more than 700,000 men and women across the Nation serve their fellow citizens in their capacity as guardians of peace;

Whereas the law enforcement officers of New Jersey are recognized for their dedication to promote, advance, and encourage cooperation among all law enforcement officers;

Whereas law enforcement officers serve at great risk to their

personal safety;

Whereas the citizens of New Jersey are indebted to their law

enforcement officers, who are willing to die to protect

them and their families and to risk all of their hopes and
2

•HRES 224 IH

all of their dreams to ensure the safety and well-being of

New Jersey communities;

Whereas law enforcement officers of New Jersey have fallen

in the line of duty, and the thoughts and prayers of the

House of Representatives and the country remain with

the families of these men and women;

Whereas the men and women in New Jersey’s law enforcement community are on the front line in our schools and

on our streets, preserving the right of our children to

learn in schools that are free of violence and the right of

our citizens to safe communities; and

Whereas the members of the New Jersey State Law Enforcement Officers Association are an integral part of our society, in whom we have instilled public trust: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the bravery and honor of the law enforcement offi3 cers of New Jersey, and the service of those officers to

4 their communities.

Æ
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 19-20594 

Summary Calendar 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Ivan Pagoaga Castro, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:19-CR-196-1 

______________________________ 

Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ivan Pagoaga 

Castro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castro has filed a response. The record is not 

sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Castro’s claims 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

April 12, 2023 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 19-20594 Document: 00516708925 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/12/2023
No. 19-20594 

2 

of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the 

claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 

F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). 

We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein, as well as Castro’s response. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 19-20594 Document: 00516708925 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/12/2023
#### Peter Callanan, Respondent, v. John Morrell and Edward D. Terbell, Appellants.

Judgment reversed, new trial granted, referee discharged, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Landon,J.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.223 What steps must be taken to protect the security of alcohol testing sites? ( a ) If you are a BAT, STT, or other person operating an alcohol testing site, you must prevent unauthorized personnel from entering the testing site. ( 1 ) The only people you are to treat as authorized persons are employees being tested, BATs, STTs, and other alcohol testing site workers, DERs, employee representatives authorized by the employer (*e.g.,* on the basis of employer policy or labor-management agreement), and DOT agency representatives.
( 2 ) You must ensure that all persons are under the supervision of a BAT or STT at all times when permitted into the site.
( 3 ) You may remove any person who obstructs, interferes with, or causes unnecessary delay in the testing process.
( b ) As the BAT or STT, you must not allow any person other than you, the employee, or a DOT agency representative to actually witness the testing process (see §§ 40.241-40.255).
( c ) If you are operating an alcohol testing site, you must ensure that when an EBT or ASD is not being used for testing, you store it in a secure place.
( d ) If you are operating an alcohol testing site, you must ensure that no one other than BATs or other employees of the site have access to the site when an EBT is unsecured.
( e ) As a BAT or STT, to avoid distraction that could compromise security, you are limited to conducting an alcohol test for only one employee at a time. ( 1 ) When an EBT screening test on an employee indicates an alcohol concentration of 0.02 or higher, and the same EBT will be used for the confirmation test, you are not allowed to use the EBT for a test on another employee before completing the confirmation test on the first employee.
( 2 ) As a BAT who will conduct both the screening and the confirmation test, you are to complete the entire screening and confirmation process on one employee before starting the screening process on another employee.
( 3 ) You are not allowed to leave the alcohol testing site while the testing process for a given employee is in progress, except to notify a supervisor or contact a DER for assistance in the case an employee or other person who obstructs, interferes with, or unnecessarily delays the testing process.
§ 38.27 Priority seating signs. ( a ) Each vehicle shall contain sign(s) which indicate that seats in the front of the vehicle are priority seats for persons with disabilities, and that other passengers should make such seats available to those who wish to use them. At least one set of forward-facing seats shall be so designated.
( b ) Each securement location shall have a sign designating it as such.
( c ) Characters on signs required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section shall have a width-to-height ratio between 3:5 and 1:1 and a stroke width-to-height ratio between 1:5 and 1:10, with a minimum character height (using an upper case “X”) of 5 ⁄ 8 inch, with “wide” spacing (generally, the space between letters shall be 1 ⁄ 16 the height of upper case letters), and shall contrast with the background either light-on-dark or dark-on-light.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.203 What problems cause a drug test to be cancelled unless they are corrected? ( a ) As the MRO, when a laboratory discovers a “correctable flaw” during its processing of incoming specimens (see § 40.83), the laboratory will attempt to correct it. If the laboratory is unsuccessful in this attempt, it will report to you that the specimen has been “Rejected for Testing” (with the reason stated).
( b ) The following is a “correctable flaw” that laboratories must attempt to correct: The collector's signature is omitted on the certification statement on the CCF.
( c ) As the MRO, when you discover a “correctable flaw” during your review of the CCF, you must cancel the test unless the flaw is corrected.
( d ) The following are correctable flaws that you must attempt to correct: ( 1 ) The employee's signature is omitted from the certification statement, unless the employee's failure or refusal to sign is noted on the “Remarks” line of the CCF.
( 2 ) The certifying scientist's signature is omitted on Copy 1 of the CCF for a positive, adulterated, substituted, or invalid test result.
( 3 ) The collector uses a non-Federal form or an expired CCF for the test. This flaw may be corrected through the procedure set forth in § 40.205(b)(2), provided that the collection testing process has been conducted in accordance with the procedures in this part in an HHS-certified laboratory.
[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 41954, Aug. 9, 2001; 75 FR 59108, Sept. 27, 2010; 76 FR 59578, Sept. 27, 2011; 82 FR 52246, Nov. 13, 2017]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0885.html[7/21/2015 5:13:29 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-76j2

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0885

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Lori Schmidt

General Comment

Leave MY retirement planning to ME!! I am smart enough to plan my own retirement and have selected

 professionals who assist me with that! Those that I choose and TRUST!!!
#### Mortimer Ely v. Leander S. Phelps.

New trial denied and judgment for the defendant on the verdict. Opinion by

Bradley, J.;

Barker, J.v not sitting.
**Exhibit 24.14**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS** that I, **Don Thompson**do hereby appoint John W. Roweand William A. Von Hoene, Jr., or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2008 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to befiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**Don Thompson**

**DATE: February 2, 2009**