alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: John Rego < jrego@JonesDay.com >

To: Steve Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: John.Willoughby@erametgroup.com

, Jeff.McKinney@erametgroup.com

, Gregory.Timmons@erametgroup.com

, jskonrady@fpiwv.com

, lmcafee@bdlaw.com

Date: 02/12/2013 11:48 AM Subject: Proposed NESHAP for Ferroalloys Production

- CORRECT ATTACHMENT INCLUDED

MY APOLOGIES

-- I ATTACHED THE WRONG FILE TO THE INITIAL EMAIL

Steve:

As discussed at the January 23, 2013 meeting in Marietta, attached is the background information regarding the level of agreement between the revised, "emission factor" emissions inventory and recent directly

- measured ambient concentrations in Marietta.

A hard copy of the attached letter will follow by regular mail.

Please do not hesitate to let me know if three are questions regarding the attached. Also, I would like to restate EMI's requests of January 23 and February 4, 2013 to be included in any dis cussion regarding proposed fugitive monitoring protocols. To the extent that the data from such testing could be used to evaluate the need for, or scope of, future emissions standards applicable to EMI, EPA should include EMI

in those discussions.

Thanks,

John John Rego • Environmental, Health & Safety

901 LAKESIDE AVENUE • CLEVELAND, OHIO 44114

DIRECT 216.586.7542 • FAX 216.5 79.0212 •
JREGO@JONESDAY.COM

========== This e

- mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or protected by attorney

- client or other privilege. If you received this e

- mail in error, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify sender by reply e

- mail, so that our records can be corrected.

========== 

### (See attached file: DOC001.pdf)
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.253 What are the procedures for conducting an alcohol confirmation test? As the BAT conducting an alcohol confirmation test, you must follow these steps in order to complete the confirmation test process: ( a ) In the presence of the employee, you must conduct an air blank on the EBT you are using before beginning the confirmation test and show the reading to the employee. ( 1 ) If the reading is 0.00, the test may proceed. If the reading is greater than 0.00, you must conduct another air blank.
( 2 ) If the reading on the second air blank is 0.00, the test may proceed. If the reading is greater than 0.00, you must take the EBT out of service.
( 3 ) If you take an EBT out of service for this reason, no one may use it for testing until the EBT is found to be within tolerance limits on an external check of calibration.
( 4 ) You must proceed with the test of the employee using another EBT, if one is available.
( b ) You must open a new individually wrapped or sealed mouthpiece in view of the employee and insert it into the device in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
( c ) You must ensure that you and the employee read the unique test number displayed on the EBT.
( d ) You must instruct the employee to blow steadily and forcefully into the mouthpiece for at least six seconds or until the device indicates that an adequate amount of breath has been obtained.
( e ) You must show the employee the result displayed on the EBT.
( f ) You must show the employee the result and unique test number that the EBT prints out either directly onto the ATF or onto a separate printout.
( g ) If the EBT provides a separate printout of the result, you must attach the printout to the designated space on the ATF with tamper-evident tape, or use a self-adhesive label that is tamper-evident.
[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 41954, Aug. 9, 2001]
#### John Hills and William Hills, Respondents, *v.*M. M. Walker and others. *Appellants.*

— ■ Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

#### § 40.343 What tasks may a service agent perform for an employer?

As a service agent, you may perform for employers the tasks needed to comply with DOT agency drug and alcohol testing regulations, subject to the requirements and limitations of this part.
<PAGE>
 
                                                     Exhibit (23)-2
                                                     Commonwealth Edison Company
                                                     Form 10-K File No. 1-1839



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                   -----------------------------------------



     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this Form 10-K of our report dated January 31, 1997, on
Commonwealth Edison Company and subsidiary companies' consolidated financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996 (Report), included in
Commonwealth Edison Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 1997,
to the inclusion in this Form 10-K of our report dated January 31, 1997, on the
supplemental schedule of Commonwealth Edison Company as of and for the year
ended December 31, 1996, and to the incorporation of such reports into
Commonwealth Edison Company's previously filed prospectuses as follows:  (1)
prospectus dated August 21, 1986, constituting part of Form S-3 Registration
Statement File No. 33-6879, as amended (relating to the Company's Debt
Securities and Common Stock); (2) prospectus dated January 7, 1994, constituting
part of Form S-3 Registration Statement File No. 33-51379 (relating to the
Company's Debt Securities and Cumulative Preference Stock); and (3) prospectus
dated September 19, 1995, constituting part of Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3
Registration Statement File No. 33-61343, as amended (relating to Company-
Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities of ComEd Financing I).  We
also consent to the application of our Report, incorporated by reference in this
Form 10-K, to the ratios of earnings to fixed charges and the ratios of earnings
to fixed charges and preferred and preference stock dividend requirements for
each of the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 appearing in Exhibit 99
of Unicom Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 1997.



                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Chicago, Illinois
March 21, 1997
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsReusable rocket engine turbopump health monitoring system, part 3Degradation mechanisms and sensor identification/selection resulted in a list of degradation modes and a list of sensors that are utilized in the diagnosis of these degradation modes. The sensor list is divided into primary and secondary indicators of the corresponding degradation modes. The signal conditioning requirements are discussed, describing the methods of producing the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) post-hot-fire test data to be utilized by the Health Monitoring System. Development of the diagnostic logic and algorithms is also presented. The knowledge engineering approach, as utilized, includes the knowledge acquisition effort, characterization of the expert's problem solving strategy, conceptually defining the form of the applicable knowledge base, and rule base, and identifying an appropriate inferencing mechanism for the problem domain. The resulting logic flow graphs detail the diagnosis/prognosis procedure as followed by the experts. The nature and content of required support data and databases is also presented. The distinction between deep and shallow types of knowledge is identified. Computer coding of the Health Monitoring System is shown to follow the logical inferencing of the logic flow graphs/algorithms.Document ID19900017004Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsPerry, John G.*(Rockwell International Corp. Canoga Park, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 14, 1989Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberRI/RD89-171-PT-3NASA-CR-182294NAS 1.26:182294Accession Number90N26320Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-25279Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017004.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
1210-AB32-2-1043.html[7/23/2015 3:20:36 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-te8a

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1535

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Barbara Hensinger

Address:

23407 Companero Dr

Sorrento, FL, 32776

Email: barbhen@aol.com

General Comment

We have managed our 401 for years, we do not need more regulation. when the government gets involved, it

 results in more taxes and regulatory costs. Stop the nanny nation, let adults be responsible for themselves.

Leave our pensions to us.
§ 199.101 Anti-drug plan. ( a ) Each operator shall maintain and follow a written anti-drug plan that conforms to the requirements of this part and the DOT Procedures. The plan must contain— ( 1 ) Methods and procedures for compliance with all the requirements of this part, including the employee assistance program;
( 2 ) The name and address of each laboratory that analyzes the specimens collected for drug testing;
( 3 ) The name and address of the operator's Medical Review Officer, and Substance Abuse Professional; and
( 4 ) Procedures for notifying employees of the coverage and provisions of the plan.
( b ) The Associate Administrator or the State Agency that has submitted a current certification under the pipeline safety laws (49 U.S.C. 60101 *et seq.*) with respect to the pipeline facility governed by an operator's plans and procedures may, after notice and opportunity for hearing as provided in 49 CFR 190.206 or the relevant State procedures, require the operator to amend its plans and procedures as necessary to provide a reasonable level of safety.
[53 FR 47096, Nov. 21, 1988, as amended by Amdt. 199-2, 54 FR 51850, Dec. 18, 1989; Amdt. 199-4, 56 FR 31091, July 9, 1991; 56 FR 41077, Aug. 19, 1991; Amdt. 199-13, 61 FR 18518, Apr. 26, 1996; Amdt. 199-15, 63 FR 36863, July 8, 1998. Redesignated by Amdt. 199-19, 66 FR 47118, Sept. 11, 2001; Amdt. 199-25, 78 FR 58915, Sept. 25, 2013]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1131.html[7/22/2015 12:11:48 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-px03

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1131

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Andrew White

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan for my own retirement.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Genomic Medicine Program Advisory Committee will meet on October 15, 2007 in Room 230 at the Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The meeting will convene at 8 a.m. and adjourn at 5:30 p.m. The meeting is open to the public. 

The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice and make recommendations to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on using genetic information to optimize medical care of veterans and to enhance development of tests and treatments for diseases particularly relevant to veterans. 

The Committee will receive program updates and updates from the workgroups on Ethics and Colon Cancer testing, and will be asked to provide insight into optimal ways for VA to incorporate genomic information into its health care program while applying appropriate ethical oversight and protecting the privacy of veterans. 

                    Members of the public may provide up to five minute statements during the period reserved for public comments. They may also submit, at the time of the meeting, a 1-2 page summary of their comments for inclusion in the official meeting record. Any member of the public seeking additional information should contact Dr. Sumitra Muralidhar at                     *sumitra.muralidhar@va.gov.*

Dated: September 6, 2007. 

By direction of the Secretary. 

E. Philip Riggin, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-4460 Filed 9-11-07:8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
**GETTINGUNCLESAMTO ENFORCEYOURCIVILRIGHTS**

***Revised October 2003***

**CONTENTS**

Letter from the   Staff Director

Introduction How to File a Complaint When and Where to File a Complaint

Special Circumstances

- Immigration-Related     Employment Discrimination
- Native     Americans
- Institutionalized     Persons
- Military     Personnel

More Help

- Discrimination     Law Guides
- Legal     Action
- Selected     Private Organizations

Agency Regional,   District, or Local Offices

U.S. Bar Associations

Acknowledgments
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 269 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 11, 2002.
Whereas Antonio Meucci, the great Italian inventor, had a career that was both 
        extraordinary and tragic;
Whereas, upon immigrating to New York, Meucci continued to work with ceaseless 
        vigor on a project he had begun in Havana, Cuba, an invention he later 
        called the ``teletrofono'', involving electronic communications;
Whereas Meucci set up a rudimentary communications link in his Staten Island 
        home that connected the basement with the first floor, and later, when 
        his wife began to suffer from crippling arthritis, he created a 
        permanent link between his lab and his wife's second floor bedroom;
Whereas, having exhausted most of his life's savings in pursuing his work, 
        Meucci was unable to commercialize his invention, though he demonstrated 
        his invention in 1860 and had a description of it published in New 
        York's Italian language newspaper;
Whereas Meucci never learned English well enough to navigate the complex 
        American business community;
Whereas Meucci was unable to raise sufficient funds to pay his way through the 
        patent application process, and thus had to settle for a caveat, a one 
        year renewable notice of an impending patent, which was first filed on 
        December 28, 1871;
Whereas Meucci later learned that the Western Union affiliate laboratory 
        reportedly lost his working models, and Meucci, who at this point was 
        living on public assistance, was unable to renew the caveat after 1874;
Whereas in March 1876, Alexander Graham Bell, who conducted experiments in the 
        same laboratory where Meucci's materials had been stored, was granted a 
        patent and was thereafter credited with inventing the telephone;
Whereas on January 13, 1887, the Government of the United States moved to annul 
        the patent issued to Bell on the grounds of fraud and misrepresentation, 
        a case that the Supreme Court found viable and remanded for trial;
Whereas Meucci died in October 1889, the Bell patent expired in January 1893, 
        and the case was discontinued as moot without ever reaching the 
        underlying issue of the true inventor of the telephone entitled to the 
        patent; and
Whereas if Meucci had been able to pay the $10 fee to maintain the caveat after 
        1874, no patent could have been issued to Bell: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the life 
and achievements of Antonio Meucci should be recognized, and his work in the 
invention of the telephone should be acknowledged.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 308

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the

establishment of a National Motivation and Inspiration Day.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 6, 2001

Mr. GRUCCI submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the establishment of a National Motivation and Inspiration Day.

Whereas motivation and inspiration have played important

roles in the greatest achievements of civilized society and

are characteristics common to all great leaders;

Whereas both children and adults need motivation and inspiration in order to achieve success and happiness in their

lives;

Whereas the inspiration to define goals at school, home, and

work and the motivation to achieve those goals is critical

to achieving success and happiness;

Whereas all children and young adults need mentors to inspire them to achieve their goals and to motivate them
2

•HRES 308 IH

to direct their energies toward positive and constructive

activities and goals;

Whereas adults who mentor children and young adults become inspired and motivated themselves;

Whereas a renewed focus on motivation and inspiration is

particularly important in the wake of the tragedies of

September 11, 2001;

Whereas the beginning of the year is often a time of reflection, planning, and goal setting;

Whereas the establishment of a National Motivation and Inspiration Day would provide an opportunity for the people of the United States to focus on the importance of

maintaining motivation and inspiration in their lives; and

Whereas January 2 would be an appropriate day to establish

as National Motivation and Inspiration Day: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) a National Motivation and Inspiration Day

4 should be established; and

5 (2) the President should issue a proclamation

6 each year calling on the people of the United States

7 to observe such a day with appropriate programs

8 and activities.

Æ
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1249.html[7/22/2015 9:14:25 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-ckzh

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1249

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Joe Anonymous

General Comment

We the people are smart enough to decide how to retire...we have the God given right to decide for our selves

 and live with the consequences. Social securities benefits are up to us in how to use them. Do not make rules for

 401K plans or other retirementnplans
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

REYNALDO LOPEZ, an individual, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

and 

EUNICE DELGADILLO, an individual; et 

al., 

Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC., a Georgia 

corporation and DOES, 1 through 50, 

inclusive, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-56325 

D.C. No. 2:16-cv-04497-DSF-AJW 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2018**

Before: SILVERMAN, PAEZ, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 23 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-56325 

Reynaldo Lopez appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment 

in his diversity action alleging age discrimination under the California Fair 

Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. We review de novo. Deppe v. United Airlines, 217 F.3d 1262, 1264 (9th 

Cir. 2000). We affirm. 

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Lopez failed 

to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendant’s nondiscriminatory reasons for terminating him were pretextual. See Guz v. Bechtel 

Nat’l, Inc., 8 P.3d 1089, 1113-14, 1118-19 (Cal. 2000) (setting forth burdenshifting framework for analyzing discrimination claims under the FEHA and 

noting that summary judgment for the employer is appropriate where, given the 

strength of the employer’s legitimate reasons, countervailing circumstantial 

evidence is too weak to raise a rational inference of discrimination).

We reject as meritless Lopez’s contentions concerning ineffective assistance 

of counsel. See Nicholson v. Rushen, 767 F.2d 1426, 1427 (9th Cir. 1985) 

(“Generally, a plaintiff in a civil case has no right to effective assistance of 

counsel.”).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 
3 17-56325 

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009). We do not 

consider documents and facts not presented to the district court. See United States 

v. Elias, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts not presented to 

the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”).

AFFIRMED.