UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

               For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004


[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


            For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-11935


                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX
        (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                             94-2887133
(State or other jurisdiction of                              (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                             Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

<PAGE>


                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                                 March 31, 2004

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Assets
<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $ 462
   Receivables and deposits                                                     281
   Restricted escrows                                                           839
   Other assets                                                               1,459
   Investment properties:
      Land                                                   $ 9,200
      Buildings and related personal property                  80,833
                                                               90,033
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (52,446)       37,587
                                                                           $ 40,628
Liabilities and Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 437
   Tenant security deposits payable                                             307
   Accrued property taxes                                                       452
   Other liabilities                                                            519
   Mortgage notes payable                                                    46,510

Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
   General partner                                           $ (9,897)
   Limited partners (89,292 units issued and
      outstanding)                                              2,300        (7,597)
                                                                           $ 40,628



        See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                                March 31,
                                                        2004               2003
                                                                        (Restated)
Revenues:
<S>                                                    <C>               <C>
  Rental income                                        $ 2,773           $ 2,877
  Other income                                             373               277
      Total revenues                                     3,146             3,154

Expenses:
  Operating                                              1,372             1,446
  General and administrative                               109               119
  Depreciation                                             810               791
  Interest                                                 778               906
  Property tax                                             273               268
      Total expenses                                     3,342             3,530

Loss from continuing operations                           (196)             (376)
Loss from discontinued operations (Note A)                  --              (118)

Net loss                                               $ (196)            $ (494)

Net loss allocated to general partner                   $ (24)            $ (58)
Net loss allocated to limited partners                    (172)             (436)

                                                       $ (196)            $ (494)
Per limited partnership unit:
  Loss from continuing operations                      $ (1.93)          $ (3.71)
  Loss from discontinued operations                         --             (1.17)

Net loss per limited partnership unit                  $ (1.93)          $ (4.88)

Distributions per limited partnership unit             $ 5.92              $ --

        See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

          CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' (DEFICIENCY) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                      Limited
                                    Partnership    General      Limited
                                       Units       Partner      Partners       Total

<S>                                    <C>           <C>        <C>           <C>
Original capital contributions         89,292        $ --       $89,292       $89,292

Partners' (deficiency) capital
   at December 31, 2003               89,292       $(9,802)     $ 3,001       $(6,801)

Distributions to partners                 --           (71)        (529)         (600)

Net loss for the three months
   ended March 31, 2004                   --           (24)        (172)         (196)

Partners' (deficiency) capital
   at March 31, 2004                  89,292       $(9,897)     $ 2,300       $(7,597)


        See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                       March 31,
                                                                   2004        2003
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                              <C>         <C>
  Net loss                                                       $ (196)     $ (494)
  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided
   by operating activities:
      Depreciation                                                  810          913
      Amortization of loan costs                                     22           20
      Change in accounts:
       Receivables and deposits                                     (55)         569
       Other assets                                                (223)        (148)
       Accounts payable                                              74         (167)
       Tenant security deposits payable                             (13)          28
       Accrued property taxes                                       274         (241)
       Other liabilities                                              2          297
       Due to affiliates                                             15           --
       Due to former affiliate                                     (376)          --
         Net cash provided by operating activities                  334          777

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (217)        (308)
  Net deposits to restricted escrows                                (17)          --
         Net cash used in investing activities                     (234)        (308)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage notes payable                               (288)        (242)
  Advances from affiliates                                           --        2,101
  Payoff of mortgage note payable                                    --       (2,101)
  Distributions to partners                                        (600)          --
         Net cash used in financing activities                     (888)        (242)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents               (788)         227
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                  1,250        2,025
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                       $ 462       $ 2,252

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                         $ 756       $ 1,133

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash information:
  Fixed assets in accounts payable                                $ 60        $ --

        See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The  accompanying   unaudited   consolidated  financial  statements  of  Century
Properties Fund XIX (the  "Partnership" or  "Registrant")  have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial statements. The general partner of the Partnership is Fox Partners II,
a California  general  partnership.  The general partners of Fox Partners II are
Fox Capital Management Corporation ("FCMC" or the "Managing General Partner"), a
California  corporation,  Fox Realty  Investors  ("FRI"),  a California  general
partnership, and Fox Partners 83, a California general partnership. The Managing
General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment  Investment and Management  Company
("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. In the opinion of the
Managing  General  Partner,  all  adjustments  (consisting  of normal  recurring
accruals)  considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.
Operating  results  for the three  month  period  ended  March 31,  2004 are not
necessarily  indicative  of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year
ending  December 31, 2004. For further  information,  refer to the  consolidated
financial  statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144,
the  consolidated  statement of operations  for the three months ended March 31,
2003 has been restated to reflect the operations of McMillan Place Apartments as
loss from discontinued operations due to its sale in August 2003.

Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The  Partnership  has no employees  and is  dependent  on the  Managing  General
Partner  and  its  affiliates  for  the  management  and  administration  of all
Partnership  activities.  The  Partnership  Agreement  provides  for (i) certain
payments to affiliates for services and (ii)  reimbursement  of certain expenses
incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

During  the three  months  ended  March 31,  2004 and  2003,  affiliates  of the
Managing  General Partner were entitled to receive 5% of gross receipts from all
of  the  Partnership's   properties  as  compensation  for  providing   property
management  services.  The  Partnership  paid to such  affiliates  approximately
$158,000  and  $188,000  for the three  months  ended  March 31,  2004 and 2003,
respectively, which is included in operating expenses and loss from discontinued
operations.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  received   reimbursement  of
accountable  administrative  expenses  amounting  to  approximately  $45,000 and
$50,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively,  which
is included in general and administrative expenses.

Pursuant  to  the  Partnership  Agreement,  for  managing  the  affairs  of  the
Partnership,  the Managing  General Partner is entitled to receive a Partnership
management fee equal to 10% of the  Partnership's  adjusted cash from operations
as  distributed.  During the three months  ended March 31,  2004,  approximately
$60,000  was  paid  to  the  Managing   General   Partner  and  is  included  in
distributions  to the Managing  General  Partner.  No fee was earned  during the
three  months  ended March 31, 2003  because  there were no  distributions  from
operations.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  has  made  available  to the
Partnership  a  credit  line  of  up to  $150,000  per  property  owned  by  the
Partnership.  During the three months ended March 31, 2003, the Managing General
Partner  exceeded this credit limit and advanced the  Partnership  approximately
$2,101,000.  This  advance  was used to repay the  second  mortgage  encumbering
McMillan  Place  Apartments,  which  was part of the loan  extension  agreement.
Interest  on the  credit  line is  charged  at the  prime  rate  plus 2% and was
approximately $2,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003. This advance and
related  accrued  interest were paid in full during the year ended  December 31,
2003  from  the  proceeds  of the sale of  McMillan  Place  Apartments.  No such
advances were received in 2004.

The  Partnership  insures its properties up to certain  limits through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the AIMCO limits through
insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers  unaffiliated  with the
Managing General Partner.  During 2004, the Partnership anticipates its cost for
insurance  coverage  and  fees  associated  with  policy  claims  administration
provided  by  AIMCO  and its  affiliates  will be  approximately  $121,000.  The
Partnership was charged approximately $217,000 for 2003.

Note C - Extension of Mortgage Note Payable

The first and second  mortgage  loans for McMillan Place  Apartments  matured in
October 2002 and were in default at December 31,  2002.  On March 25, 2003,  the
Managing  General  Partner and the lender agreed to an eleven month extension of
the  terms  of the  mortgage.  As part of the  agreement,  an  affiliate  of the
Managing General Partner advanced approximately $2,101,000 to the Partnership to
repay the second mortgage loan.  Pursuant to the agreement,  the stated interest
rate was 6.5% from the  previous  maturity  date and the loan was  scheduled  to
mature on September 30, 2003.  McMillan Place Apartments was sold in August 2003
and the first mortgage loan was repaid at that time.

Note D - Contingencies

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint (the "Heller action")
was filed  against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,
captioned  Heller v.  Insignia  Financial  Group.  On or about  August 6,  2001,
plaintiffs filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller action was brought as a
purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach
of fiduciary  duty,  unfair  competition,  conversion,  unjust  enrichment,  and
judicial dissolution.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the Managing General Partner has also agreed to make
at least one round of tender offers to purchase all of the partnership interests
in the Partnerships within one year of final approval,  if it is granted, and to
provide  partners with the independent  appraisals at the time of these tenders.
The proposed  settlement also provided for the limitation of the allowable costs
which  the  Managing   General   Partner  or  its  affiliates  will  charge  the
Partnerships  in connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class
counsel  fees and  costs in this  litigation.  On April  11,  2003,  notice  was
distributed  to  limited   partners   providing  the  details  of  the  proposed
settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
("Objector")  filed an  appeal  seeking  to  vacate  and/or  reverse  the  order
approving the settlement and entering  judgment  thereto.  On November 24, 2003,
the Objector filed an  application  requesting the Court order AIMCO to withdraw
settlement  tender offers it had  commenced,  refrain from making further offers
pending the appeal and auction any units tendered to third  parties,  contending
that the offers did not conform  with the terms of the  Settlement.  Counsel for
the Objector (on behalf of another  investor)  had  alternatively  requested the
Court take certain  action  purportedly  to enforce the terms of the  settlement
agreement.  On December 18, 2003,  the Court heard oral  argument on the motions
and denied them both in their entirety.  On January 28, 2004, Objector filed his
opening brief in his pending  appeal.  On April 23, 2004,  the Managing  General
Partner and its  affiliates  filed a response brief in support of the settlement
and the judgment  thereto.  Plaintiffs have also filed a brief in support of the
settlement.  Objector is  scheduled  to file a reply brief no later than May 13,
2004.

On August 8, 2003 AIMCO  Properties  L.P., an affiliate of the Managing  General
Partner,  was served  with a  Complaint  in the United  States  District  Court,
District of Columbia alleging that AIMCO Properties L.P.  willfully violated the
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to pay maintenance  workers  overtime
for all hours  worked in excess of forty per week.  On March 5, 2004  Plaintiffs
filed an amended complaint also naming NHP Management Company,  which is also an
affiliate  of the  Managing  General  Partner.  The  Complaint  is  styled  as a
Collective  Action  under  the FLSA and seeks to  certify  state  subclasses  in
California, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs
contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. failed to compensate  maintenance workers for
time  that they were  required  to be  "on-call".  Additionally,  the  Complaint
alleges AIMCO  Properties  L.P.  failed to comply with the FLSA in  compensating
maintenance  workers  for time that they  worked in  responding  to a call while
"on-call".  The Defendants have filed an answer to the Amended Complaint denying
the substantive allegations. Discovery is currently underway.
Note D - Contingencies (continued)

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership  is unaware  of any other  pending  or  outstanding  litigation
matters  involving  it or its  investment  properties  that are not of a routine
nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

Pursuant to a formal order of investigation received by AIMCO on March 29, 2004,
the  Central  Regional  Office of the  United  States  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission is conducting an  investigation  relating to certain  matters.  AIMCO
believes the areas of investigation  include AIMCO's  miscalculated  monthly net
rental  income  figures in third  quarter 2003,  forecasted  guidance,  accounts
payable,  rent concessions,  vendor rebates,  and capitalization of expenses and
payroll.  AIMCO is cooperating  fully.  AIMCO does not believe that the ultimate
outcome  will  have a  material  adverse  effect on its  consolidated  financial
condition or results of  operations  taken as a whole.  Similarly,  the Managing
General Partner does not believe that the ultimate  outcome will have a material
adverse effect on the Partnership's  consolidated financial condition or results
of operations taken as a whole.

ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  Actual results may differ materially
from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a
variety of risks and factors including,  without limitation:  national and local
economic  conditions;  the terms of  governmental  regulations  that  affect the
Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment
in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks, including the risk that cash
flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal
and interest;  real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and
the general  economic  climate in local markets and  competition  for tenants in
such markets;  litigation,  including  costs  associated  with  prosecuting  and
defending  claims  and  any  adverse   outcomes,   and  possible   environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment  properties consist of seven apartment  complexes.
The following  table sets forth the average  occupancy of the properties for the
three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003:

                                                   Average Occupancy
      Property                                      2004       2003

      Sunrunner Apartments (1)                      87%        93%
         St. Petersburg, Florida
      Misty Woods Apartments                        89%        89%
         Charlotte, North Carolina
      Vinings Peak Apartments                       86%        86%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Plantation Crossing (2)                       88%        93%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Wood Lake Apartments                          90%        90%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Greenspoint Apartments (2)                    86%        91%
         Phoenix, Arizona
      Sandspoint Apartments (3)                     90%        78%
         Phoenix, Arizona

   (1)      The Managing General Partner attributes the decrease in occupancy at
            Sunrunner Apartments to increased  competition from new and recently
            renovated properties in the local market.

   (2)      The Managing General Partner attributes the decrease in occupancy at
            Plantation  Crossing and Greenspoint  Apartments to increased credit
            standards for prospective tenants.

   (3)      The Managing General Partner attributes the increase in occupancy at
            Sandspoint  Apartments  to  increased  marketing  efforts  by  local
            management.

The  Partnership's  financial  results  are  dependent  upon a number of factors
including  the  ability  to  attract  and  maintain  tenants  at the  investment
properties,  interest  rates on mortgage  loans,  costs  incurred to operate the
investment  properties,  general economic conditions and weather. As part of the
ongoing business plan of the Partnership,  the Managing General Partner monitors
the  rental  market  environment  of its  investment  properties  to assess  the
feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and
protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the
Managing  General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of
inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and  maintaining a
high overall  occupancy  level.  However,  the Managing  General Partner may use
rental  concessions  and  rental  rate  reductions  to offset  softening  market
conditions, accordingly, there is no guarantee that the Managing General Partner
will be able to sustain  such a plan.  Further,  a number of  factors  which are
outside the control of the  Partnership  such as the local economic  climate and
weather can adversely or positively impact the Partnership's financial results.

Results of Operations

The Partnership  realized a net loss of approximately  $196,000 and $494,000 for
the three  months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003,  respectively.  The decrease in
net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2004 is due to the decrease in the
loss from  discontinued  operations and a decrease in total expenses,  partially
offset by a decrease in total revenues.

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144,
the  consolidated  statement of operations  for the three months ended March 31,
2003 has been restated to reflect the operations of McMillan Place Apartments as
loss from discontinued operations due to its sale in August 2003.

Excluding the loss from discontinued  operations,  the Partnership  recognized a
loss from continuing  operations of approximately  $196,000 and $376,000 for the
three  months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003,  respectively.  The decrease in net
loss for the three  months  ended  March 31,  2004 is due to a decrease in total
expenses  partially  offset by a  decrease  in total  revenues.  Total  revenues
decreased due to a decrease in rental income  partially offset by an increase in
other  income.  Rental  income  decreased  due  to  decreases  in  occupancy  at
Sunrunner,  Plantation  Crossing and  Greenspoint  Apartments,  decreases in the
average  rental  rate at  Vinings  Peak,  Plantation  Crossing,  Wood  Lake  and
Greenspoint  Apartments  and an  increase  in bad debt  expense at Wood Lake and
Sandspoint Apartments partially offset by an increase in occupancy at Sandspoint
Apartments.  Other income increased due to increases in utility  reimbursements,
cleaning and damage fees, and lease cancellation fees primarily at Wood Lake and
Sandspoint Apartments.

Total  expenses  decreased  for the three  months  ended  March 31,  2004 due to
decreases in operating and interest expenses. Operating expense decreased due to
decreases  in  advertising  and  maintenance  expenses,  partially  offset by an
increase in property expenses. Advertising expense decreased due to decreases in
periodicals  at most of the  investment  properties and referral fees at Vinings
Peak and Wood Lake Apartments. Maintenance expense decreased due to decreases in
contract labor at six of the investment  properties.  Property expense increased
due to  increases in payroll and related  expenses at most of the  Partnership's
investment properties. Interest expense decreased due to the refinancing in June
2003 of the mortgages encumbering three of the Partnership's  properties,  which
resulted in lower interest rates.

Included in general and  administrative  expense at both March 31, 2004 and 2003
are management  reimbursements to the Managing General Partner allowed under the
Partnership  Agreement.  In addition,  costs  associated  with the quarterly and
annual  communications  with  investors and  regulatory  agencies and the annual
audit required by the Partnership Agreement are also included.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  March  31,  2004,  the  Partnership   had  cash  and  cash   equivalents  of
approximately  $462,000 compared to approximately  $2,252,000 at March 31, 2003.
For the three months ended March 31, 2004, cash and cash  equivalents  decreased
approximately  $788,000 due to approximately  $234,000 of cash used in investing
activities  and  approximately  $888,000  of cash used in  financing  activities
partially  offset  by  approximately  $334,000  of cash  provided  by  operating
activities.  Net  cash  used  in  investing  activities  consisted  of  property
improvements and replacements and deposits to restricted escrows.  Net cash used
in  financing  activities  consisted  of  principal  payments  on the  mortgages
encumbering the Partnership's properties and distributions to partners.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures  required at the investment  properties to adequately  maintain the
physical  assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with
Federal,  state,  and local  legal and  regulatory  requirements.  The  Managing
General  Partner  monitors  developments  in the  area of legal  and  regulatory
compliance and is studying new federal laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests additional  compliance
measures with regard to governance,  disclosure, audit and other areas. In light
of these changes,  the  Partnership  expects that it will incur higher  expenses
related  to  compliance,  including  increased  legal  and audit  fees.  Capital
improvements planned for the Partnership's properties are detailed below.

Sunrunner Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2004,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately   $17,000  of  capital   improvements  at  Sunrunner   Apartments,
consisting primarily of major landscaping and floor covering replacements. These
improvements were funded from operating cash flow. The Partnership evaluates the
capital  improvement needs of the property during the year and currently expects
to complete an additional $90,000 in capital  improvements  during the remainder
of 2004.  Additional  capital  improvements may be considered and will depend on
the  physical  condition of the  property as well as the  anticipated  cash flow
generated by the property.

Misty Woods Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2004,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately   $5,000  of  capital  improvements  at  Misty  Woods  Apartments,
consisting  primarily of floor covering  replacements.  These  improvements were
funded  from  operating  cash  flow.  The  Partnership   evaluates  the  capital
improvement  needs of the  property  during  the year and  currently  expects to
complete an additional $120,000 in capital  improvements during the remainder of
2004.  Additional capital  improvements may be considered and will depend on the
physical  condition  of the  property as well as  replacement  reserves  and the
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Vinings Peak Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2004,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $24,000  of capital  improvements  at  Vinings  Peak  Apartments,
consisting  primarily  of  appliance  and  floor  covering   replacements.   The
Partnership  evaluates the capital  improvement needs of the property during the
year and  currently  expects  to  complete  an  additional  $116,000  in capital
improvements during the remainder of 2004.  Additional capital  improvements may
be considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as well
as replacement reserves and the anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Plantation Crossing Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2004,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately $33,000 of capital improvements at Plantation Crossing Apartments,
consisting  primarily  of exterior  painting and floor  covering  and  appliance
replacements.  These  improvements  were funded from  operating  cash flow.  The
Partnership  evaluates the capital  improvement needs of the property during the
year and  currently  expects  to  complete  an  additional  $53,000  in  capital
improvements during the remainder of 2004.  Additional capital  improvements may
be considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as well
as replacement reserves and the anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Wood Lake Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2004,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately $9,000 of capital improvements at Wood Lake Apartments, consisting
primarily  of floor and wall  covering  replacements.  These  improvements  were
funded  from  operating  cash  flow.  The  Partnership   evaluates  the  capital
improvement  needs of the  property  during  the year and  currently  expects to
complete an additional $105,000 in capital  improvements during the remainder of
2004.  Additional capital  improvements may be considered and will depend on the
physical  condition  of the  property as well as  replacement  reserves  and the
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Greenspoint Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2004,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $13,000  of  capital  improvements  at  Greenspoint   Apartments,
consisting  primarily  of  floor  covering  and  appliance  replacements.  These
improvements were funded from operating cash flow. The Partnership evaluates the
capital  improvement needs of the property during the year and currently expects
to complete an additional $161,000 in capital  improvements during the remainder
of 2004.  Additional  capital  improvements may be considered and will depend on
the  physical  condition of the  property as well as the  anticipated  cash flow
generated by the property.

Sandspoint Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2004,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $176,000  of  capital  improvements  at Sands  Point  Apartments,
consisting  primarily  of  exterior  painting,   floor  covering  and  appliance
replacements,  and roof  replacements.  The  Partnership  evaluates  the capital
improvement  needs of the  property  during  the year and  currently  expects to
complete an additional $21,000 in capital  improvements  during the remainder of
2004.  Additional capital  improvements may be considered and will depend on the
physical  condition  of the  property  as  well  as the  anticipated  cash  flow
generated by the property.

The additional  capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available
from operations or from Partnership  reserves.  To the extent that such budgeted
capital improvements are completed,  the Partnership's  distributable cash flow,
if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The first and second  mortgage  loans for McMillan Place  Apartments  matured in
October 2002 and were in default at December 31,  2002.  On March 25, 2003,  the
Managing  General  Partner and the lender agreed to an eleven month extension of
the  terms  of the  mortgage.  As part of the  agreement,  an  affiliate  of the
Managing General Partner advanced approximately $2,101,000 to the Partnership to
repay the second mortgage loan.  Pursuant to the agreement,  the stated interest
rate was 6.5% from the  previous  maturity  date and the loan was  scheduled  to
mature on September 30, 2003.  McMillan Place Apartments was sold in August 2003
and the first mortgage was repaid at that time.

The  Partnership's  assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term  needs
(exclusive  of  capital   improvements)   of  the   Partnership.   The  mortgage
indebtedness   encumbering  Sunrunner  Apartments  of  approximately  $4,360,000
matures  in  September  2021,  at which time the loan is  scheduled  to be fully
amortized.  The mortgage  indebtedness  encumbering  Greenspoint  and Sandspoint
Apartments  of  approximately  $17,195,000  matures  in May 2005 at  which  time
balloon  payments  of  approximately  $16,862,000  are  required.  The  mortgage
indebtedness  encumbering  Misty Woods  Apartments of  approximately  $4,937,000
matures  in  January  2006 at which  time a  balloon  payment  of  approximately
$4,777,000  is required.  The mortgage  indebtedness  encumbering  Vinings Peak,
Plantation  Crossing  and Woods Lake  Apartments  of  approximately  $20,018,000
matures in July 2013 at which time balloon payments of approximately $12,521,000
are  required.  The Managing  General  Partner  will  attempt to refinance  such
indebtedness  and/or sell the properties  prior to such maturity  dates.  If any
property cannot be refinanced or sold for a sufficient  amount,  the Partnership
will risk losing such property through foreclosure.

The following table sets forth the distributions made by the Partnership for the
three months March 31, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands, except per unit data):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                         Per Limited                      Per Limited
                    Three Months Ended   Partnership  Three Months Ended  Partnership
                      March 31, 2004        Unit        March 31, 2003        Unit

<S>                       <C>               <C>              <C>              <C>
Operations                $ 600             $5.92            $ --             $ --
</TABLE>

Future cash  distributions  will depend on the levels of net cash generated from
operations, the availability of cash reserves and the timing of debt maturities,
refinancings,  and/or  property  sales.  The  Partnership's  cash  available for
distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. There can be no assurance, however,
that the  Partnership  will  generate  sufficient  funds from  operations  after
required capital expenditures to permit additional distributions to its partners
in 2004 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 53,672.66 limited partnership units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 60.10% of the outstanding Units at
March 31, 2004. A number of these Units were acquired  pursuant to tender offers
made by AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is possible  that AIMCO or its  affiliates
will acquire  additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and
units in AIMCO  Properties,  L.P., the operating  partnership  of AIMCO,  either
through  private  purchases  or  tender  offers.  Pursuant  to  the  Partnership
Agreement,  unitholders  holding a majority  of the Units are  entitled  to take
action with  respect to a variety of matters that  include,  but are not limited
to,  voting on certain  amendments  to the  Partnership  Agreement and voting to
remove the Managing General  Partner.  As a result of its ownership of 60.10% of
the outstanding  Units,  AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to influence
all such voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. However, with respect
to the 25,228.66 Units acquired on January 19, 1996, AIMCO IPLP, L.P.  (formerly
known as Insignia Properties,  LP ("IPLP"), an affiliate of the Managing General
Partner  and of AIMCO,  agreed to vote such Units:  (i) against any  increase in
compensation  payable to the Managing General Partner or to its affiliates;  and
(ii) on all other matters  submitted by it or its  affiliates,  in proportion to
the vote cast by third party  unitholders.  Except for the  foregoing,  no other
limitations  are imposed on IPLP's,  AIMCO's or any other  affiliates'  right to
vote each Unit held. Although the Managing General Partner owes fiduciary duties
to the limited  partners of the  Partnership,  the Managing General Partner also
owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.  As a result, the duties
of the Managing General Partner, as managing general partner, to the Partnership
and its limited  partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Managing
General Partner to AIMCO, as its sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States which require the Partnership
to  make  estimates  and  assumptions.  The  Partnership  believes  that  of its
significant  accounting  policies,  the following may involve a higher degree of
judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The investment  properties are recorded at cost, less accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying amount of the property may be impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's investment properties.  These factors include, but are not limited
to,  changes  in the  national,  regional  and  local  economic  climate;  local
conditions,  such as an oversupply of multifamily  properties;  competition from
other available  multifamily property owners and changes in market rental rates.
Any adverse changes in these factors could cause impairment of the Partnership's
assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
Rental income  attributable to leases is recognized monthly as it is earned. The
Partnership  evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an
allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than
30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.
The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or
in response to heavy  competition from other similar  complexes in the area. Any
concessions  given at the inception of the lease are amortized  over the life of
the lease.

ITEM 3.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Partnership's management,  with the
participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Managing  General  Partner,  who are the equivalent of the  Partnership's
principal executive officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  has
evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)  under the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end
of the period covered by this report.  Based on such  evaluation,  the principal
executive  officer  and  principal  financial  officer of the  Managing  General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and principal  financial officer,  respectively,  have concluded that, as of the
end of such period,  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls and procedures are
effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial  Reporting.  There have not been any changes
in the Partnership's  internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules  13a-15(f)  and  15d-15(f)  under the Exchange  Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have  materially  affected,  or
are reasonably likely to materially affect,  the Partnership's  internal control
over financial reporting.

                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint (the "Heller action")
was filed  against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,
captioned  Heller v.  Insignia  Financial  Group.  On or about  August 6,  2001,
plaintiffs filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller action was brought as a
purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach
of fiduciary  duty,  unfair  competition,  conversion,  unjust  enrichment,  and
judicial dissolution.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the Managing General Partner has also agreed to make
at least one round of tender offers to purchase all of the partnership interests
in the Partnerships within one year of final approval,  if it is granted, and to
provide  partners with the independent  appraisals at the time of these tenders.
The proposed  settlement also provided for the limitation of the allowable costs
which  the  Managing   General   Partner  or  its  affiliates  will  charge  the
Partnerships  in connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class
counsel  fees and  costs in this  litigation.  On April  11,  2003,  notice  was
distributed  to  limited   partners   providing  the  details  of  the  proposed
settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
("Objector")  filed an  appeal  seeking  to  vacate  and/or  reverse  the  order
approving the settlement and entering  judgment  thereto.  On November 24, 2003,
the Objector filed an  application  requesting the Court order AIMCO to withdraw
settlement  tender offers it had  commenced,  refrain from making further offers
pending the appeal and auction any units tendered to third  parties,  contending
that the offers did not conform  with the terms of the  Settlement.  Counsel for
the Objector (on behalf of another  investor)  had  alternatively  requested the
Court take certain  action  purportedly  to enforce the terms of the  settlement
agreement.  On December 18, 2003,  the Court heard oral  argument on the motions
and denied them both in their entirety.  On January 28, 2004, Objector filed his
opening brief in his pending  appeal.  On April 23, 2004,  the Managing  General
Partner and its  affiliates  filed a response brief in support of the settlement
and the judgment  thereto.  Plaintiffs have also filed a brief in support of the
settlement.  Objector is  scheduled  to file a reply brief no later than May 13,
2004.

On August 8, 2003 AIMCO  Properties  L.P., an affiliate of the Managing  General
Partner,  was served  with a  Complaint  in the United  States  District  Court,
District of Columbia alleging that AIMCO Properties L.P.  willfully violated the
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to pay maintenance  workers  overtime
for all hours  worked in excess of forty per week.  On March 5, 2004  Plaintiffs
filed an amended complaint also naming NHP Management Company,  which is also an
affiliate  of the  Managing  General  Partner.  The  Complaint  is  styled  as a
Collective  Action  under  the FLSA and seeks to  certify  state  subclasses  in
California, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs
contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. failed to compensate  maintenance workers for
time  that they were  required  to be  "on-call".  Additionally,  the  Complaint
alleges AIMCO  Properties  L.P.  failed to comply with the FLSA in  compensating
maintenance  workers  for time that they  worked in  responding  to a call while
"on-call".  The Defendants have filed an answer to the Amended Complaint denying
the substantive allegations. Discovery is currently underway.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a) Exhibits:

                  Exhibit 3, Agreement of Limited  Partnership,  incorporated by
                  reference to Exhibit A to the  Prospectus  of the  Partnership
                  dated  September 20, 1983, as amended on June 13, 1989, and as
                  thereafter   supplemented,   contained  in  the   Registrant's
                  Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Reg. No. 2-79007).

                  Exhibit 31.1,  Certification  of equivalent of Chief Executive
                  Officer   pursuant   to   Securities    Exchange   Act   Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
                  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                  Exhibit 31.2,  Certification  of equivalent of Chief Financial
                  Officer   pursuant   to   Securities    Exchange   Act   Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
                  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                  Exhibit  32.1,  Certification  Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section
                  1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
                  Act of 2002.

            b) Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended March 31, 2004.



<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX


                                    By:   FOX PARTNERS II
                                          Its General Partner


                                    By:   FOX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
                                          Its Managing General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Thomas M. Herzog
                                          Thomas M. Herzog
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Chief Accounting Officer


                                    Date: May 13, 2004

<PAGE>

Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Martha L. Long, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Century Properties
      Fund XIX;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
            to us by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
      on  our  most  recent   evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
      reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit  committee of the
      registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
      functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 13, 2004

                                    /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Martha L. Long
                                    Senior  Vice  President  of Fox  Capital
                                    Management  Corporation,  equivalent  of
                                    the  chief  executive   officer  of  the
                                    Partnership


<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Thomas M. Herzog, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Century Properties
      Fund XIX;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
            to us by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
      on  our  most  recent   evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
      reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit  committee of the
      registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
      functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 13, 2004

                                    /s/Thomas M. Herzog
                                    Thomas M. Herzog
                                    Senior   Vice    President   and   Chief
                                    Accounting   Officer   of  Fox   Capital
                                    Management  Corporation,  equivalent  of
                                    the  chief  financial   officer  of  the
                                    Partnership



<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                           As Adopted Pursuant to
               Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Century  Properties
Fund XIX (the  "Partnership"),  for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive  officer of
the Partnership,  and Thomas M. Herzog, as the equivalent of the chief financial
officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:


      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Name:  Martha L. Long
                                    Date:  May 13, 2004


                                           /s/Thomas M. Herzog
                                    Name:  Thomas M. Herzog
                                    Date:  May 13, 2004


This  certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.