alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1210-AB32-2-1132.html[7/24/2015 6:27:44 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-8c4u

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1626

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Michael Jones

Address:

5458 S Eastview Dr

Kearns, 84118

General Comment

I do not think that the government should say how I spend my retirement savings. I think that most of us that are

 in our 50's and 60's and close to retirement know how to control our saving. Government is getting to involved

 in individuals lives and not concentrating on bigger items.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0665.html[7/21/2015 8:20:39 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-kjm7

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0665

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Keep you hands off of my money. You guys suck and think that you know what's best for everyone. Fact is you

 are broke and want to steal what is not yours. I worked for it, paid my taxes for it, and it's mine and not yours to

 decide how and what to do with it.
#### § 538.6 Measurement of driving range.

The driving range of a passenger automobile model type not using electricity as an alternative fuel is determined by multiplying the combined EPA urban/highway fuel economy rating when operating on the alternative fuel, by the nominal usable fuel tank capacity (in gallons), of the fuel tank containing the alternative fuel. The combined EPA urban/highway fuel economy rating is the value determined by the procedures established by the Administrator of the EPA under 49 U.S.C. 32904 and set forth in 40 CFR part 600. The driving range of a passenger automobile model type using electricity as an alternative fuel is determined by operating the vehicle in the electric-only mode of operation through the EPA urban cycle on its nominal storage capacity of electricity and the EPA highway cycle on its nominal storage capacity of electricity. Passenger automobile types using electricity as an alternative fuel that have completed the EPA urban cycle after recharging and the EPA highway cycle after recharging shall be deemed to have met the minimum range requirement.

[63 FR 66069, Dec. 1, 1998]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0709.html[7/21/2015 10:00:32 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-ov1c

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0709

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I am quite capable to handle my own retirement and do not need anyone in the government to dictate what

 happens when I retire and anytime after.

Get out of my house!
1210-AB32-2-1070.html[7/23/2015 3:42:36 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-pxfn

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1562

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jo Ann Anonymous

General Comment

I do not need the government to have a say about my ira or 401k. They have enough of my money. Stay out of

 my retirement. 

I can make my own choices, do not need your advice. Thank you.
Editorial Note on Part 395
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 395 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 395.24 Driver responsibilities—In general. ( a ) *In general.* A driver must provide the information the ELD requires as prompted by the ELD and required by the motor carrier.
( b ) *Driver's duty status.* A driver must input the driver's duty status by selecting among the following categories available on the ELD: ( 1 ) “Off duty” or “OFF” or “1”;
( 2 ) “Sleeper berth” or “SB” or “2”, to be used only if sleeper berth is used;
( 3 ) “Driving” or “D” or “3”; or
( 4 ) “On-duty not driving” or “ON” or “4”.
( c ) *Miscellaneous data.* ( 1 ) A driver must manually input the following information in the ELD: ( i ) Annotations, when applicable;
( ii ) Driver's location description, when prompted by the ELD; and
( iii ) Output file comment, when directed by an authorized safety officer.
( 2 ) A driver must manually input or verify the following information on the ELD: ( i ) Commercial motor vehicle power unit number;
( ii ) Trailer number(s), if applicable; and
( iii ) Shipping document number, if applicable.
( d ) *Driver use of ELD.* On request by an authorized safety official, a driver must produce and transfer from an ELD the driver's hours-of-service records in accordance with the instruction sheet provided by the motor carrier.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0957.html[7/21/2015 6:50:39 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-9c6w

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0957

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Janet Coker

General Comment

Hi. I want to let you know that I'm smart enough to plan for my own retirement!
#### Ashbel F. Bard, Respondent, v. John L. McKinney and others, Appellants.

Order appointing receiver reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0522.html[7/20/2015 7:58:51 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-jf1z

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0522

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

How dare them tell me how and what to do with our money. I am sick and tired of the government interfering

 with our liberties!! They all ready tax us to death and force us to take crappy insurance that most citizens cannot

 afford outrageous high deductible and now this!! Are we in America or what!
exv10w14w1



 







EXHIBIT 10.14.1




December 5, 2005




Grant Burton




Dear Grant,



In light of your demonstrated performance in the Finance and Accounting Departments, we are pleased
provide you with a retention bonus of $85,000.00, less required withholdings. This retention bonus
is to be paid in three installments on the payroll cycle corresponding to the next three
anniversary dates of your employment. The first payment will be for $25,000 (less withholdings) and
will be paid in May 2006. The second will be for $25,000 (less withholdings) and will be paid in
May 2007. The third payment of $35,000 (less withholdings) will be paid in May 2008.



In order to receive these payments, you must be an active employee of the Company, in good standing
and not on a leave of absence at the time of the payment. If you are placed on a performance
improvement plan at any time, you will not be entitled to obtain any then unpaid installment
payment of the retention bonus.



Thank you for your continued support of the company and your contributions to the results we have
achieved to date.




Sincerely,




/s/ Len Stephens




Len Stephens

SVP, Human Resources



I have received and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions set forth in this letter.




	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Grant Burton
 

Grant Burton

	12/05/05 

Date
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Tyco Capital Corporation

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
No. 33-85224, No. 333-22283, No. 333-43323, No. 333-64539, No. 333-64529,
No. 333-73255, No. 333-49276, No. 333-53688 and No. 333-62540 on Form S-3 of
Tyco Capital Corporation (formerly The CIT Group, Inc.) of our report dated
January 25, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of The CIT Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears
in the September 30, 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tyco Capital
Corporation.

KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey
December 28, 2001
NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID. 

 Required fields are denoted by "+".

  

Report Date: 05/05/2010            Control Technology Determinations (Freeform) 

Facility Information: HOLCIM (US), INC. 

RBLC ID: MS-0071

+Corporate/Company

Name:

+Facility Name: HOLCIM (US), INC.

Facility County: LOWNDES

Facility State: MS

Facility ZIP Code: 39736

Facility Country: USA

Facility Contact Name: JAMES BOYD

Facility Contact Phone: 6622725121

Facility Contact Email:

EPA Region: 4

Agency Code: MS001

Agency Name: MISSISSIPPI DEPT OF ENV QUALITY

Agency Contact: MS. CARLA BROWN 

Agency Phone: (601) 961-5235 

Agency Email: CARLA_BROWN@DEQ.STATE.MS.US 

Other Agency Contact

Info:

DALLAS BAKER

P. O. BOX 10385

HINDS, MS 39239-0385

601 961-5670

+Permit Number: 1630-00025

+SIC Code: 3241

NAICS Code: 327310

Facility Registry System

Number: 110000377707

Application Accepted

Received Date: 03/06/2002 ACT

Permit Issuance Date: 08/20/2004 ACT

Date determination

entered in RBLC: 12/06/2004

Date determination last

updated: 02/08/2005

Permit Type: A: New/Greenfield Facility 

Permit URL:

Facility Description: THIS IS A WET PROCESS CEMENT (PORTLAND)

MANUFACTURING PLANT. THE PROJECT UNDER REVIEW WAS

Permit Notes:

Previous Page
Affected Boundaries: HOLCIM (US), INC.

Facility-wide Emissions: HOLCIM (US), INC. 

+Pollutant Name: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Facility-wide Emissions

Increase: -40.0000 (Tons/Year)

Process Information: HOLCIM (US), INC. 

+Process Name: POPRTLAND CEMENT MANUFACTURING

+Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: COAL

Throughput: 650000.00

Throughput Unit: TON CLINKER/YR

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: HOLCIM (US), INC. - POPRTLAND CEMENT MANUFACTURING 

+Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter

(PM) ) 

+CAS Number: 10102

Test Method: Unspecified

+Control Method Code: N

+Control Method

Description: GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/T

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit 2: 2625.0000

Emission Limit 2 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Standard Emission

Limit: 0

Standard Emission

Limit Unit:

Standard Limit Avg.

Time/Condition:

+Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable

Requirements:

Did factors, other then
Did factors, other then

air pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?: U

+Percent Efficiency: 5.000

Compliance Verified: Yes 

Cost Effectiveness: 8,700 ($/ton)

Incremental Cost

Effectiveness:

Cost Verified (Y/N)?: Yes

Dollar Year Used In

Cost Estimates: 2003

Pollutants/Compliance

Notes:

Previous Page
Order filed February 12, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00062

- CV

____________ IRENE SILVA AND DAVI D SILVA , Appellants

V.

THE CITY OF PASADENA , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texa s Trial Court Cause No. 2013

- 36912



### O R D E R

This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 10, 2014. T he notice of appeal was due January 8, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, howev er, filed his notice of appeal on January 9, 2015, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting instrument is filed within fifteen days of its due date. Verburgt

v . Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied,appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to

support the late filing

. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd. , 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.CHouston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM
#### § 234.106 Partial activation.

Upon receipt of a credible report of a partial activation, a railroad having maintenance responsibility for the warning system shall promptly initiate efforts to warn highway users and railroad employees at the subject crossing in the same manner as required for false activations (§ 234.107).
REVISED



	
EXHIBIT 10.5

	 
	
REVISED

	 
	
EXHIBIT A

	 
	
to

	 
	
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

	 
	
Dated as of July 1, 2005

	 
	 
	
Name:
	Susan Kronick



	 	 
	
End of Term:
	June 30, 2008



	 	 
	
Revised Base Compensation:
	$1,050,000



	 	 
	
Effective Date of Revision:
	April 1, 2006



	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	
Susan Kronick
	
FEDERATED CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
#### § 236.25 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 395
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 395 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 395.5 Maximum driving time for passenger-carrying vehicles. Subject to the exceptions and exemptions in § 395.1: ( a ) No motor carrier shall permit or require any driver used by it to drive a passenger-carrying commercial motor vehicle, nor shall any such driver drive a passenger-carrying commercial motor vehicle: ( 1 ) More than 10 hours following 8 consecutive hours off duty; or
( 2 ) For any period after having been on duty 15 hours following 8 consecutive hours off duty.
( b ) No motor carrier shall permit or require a driver of a passenger-carrying commercial motor vehicle to drive, nor shall any driver drive a passenger-carrying commercial motor vehicle, regardless of the number of motor carriers using the driver's services, for any period after— ( 1 ) Having been on duty 60 hours in any 7 consecutive days if the employing motor carrier does not operate commercial motor vehicles every day of the week; or
( 2 ) Having been on duty 70 hours in any period of 8 consecutive days if the employing motor carrier operates commercial motor vehicles every day of the week.
[70 FR 50073, Aug. 25, 2005]
1210-AB32-2-1485.html[7/26/2015 5:58:21 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwh-ger2

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1981

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Thomas Watson

Address:

5580 Bob White Tr

Mims, FL, 32754

Email: tbwatson_36@hotmail.com

Phone: 3212641297

General Comment

I have seen this Government go from what it was intended to something I would expect the Russian Government

 to impose on its citizens. At 79 years old I have done alright managing my retirement funds and have taught my

 Children and Grandchildren how to look after themselves. Keep the Government out of our business and just do

 the job you were elected to do.
#### Antonio Del Pino, Respondent, v. Ozias Hermann, Appellant.

—Order affirmed, with ten

dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
EXHIBIT
31.2





SECTION
302 – CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





I, William M. Salters, certify
that:









1.  I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Britton & Koontz Capital
Corporation;




2.  Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;




4.  The registrant’s other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by the report based on such evaluation; and





c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The registrant’s other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the
audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.











Date:
            August
      7, 2008
            /s/
      William M. SaltersWilliam
      M. SaltersChief
      Financial Officer
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1372.html[7/23/2015 6:24:12 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvm-p0eb

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1372

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: William Shue

General Comment

I go to work every day to provide for my family. If I'm the one working, then I'm the one who gets paid. For your

 information, I have a great retirement portfolio. Keep your grubby paws off my money
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7968

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHNNY LEE WESLEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (1:97-cr-00382-HCM-2; 1:06-cv-01191-HCM)

Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 26, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Lee Wesley, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Lee Wesley seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wesley has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED