alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0523.html[7/20/2015 8:07:24 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-3qgz

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0523

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: jay gaylord

General Comment

Deregulate and get the hell out of my life!!
§ 38.171 General. ( a ) New, used and remanufactured vehicles and conveyances for systems not covered by other subparts of this part, to be considered accessible by regulations in part 37 of this title shall comply with this subpart.
( b ) If portions of the vehicle or conveyance are modified in a way that affects or could affect accessibility, each such portion shall comply, to the extent practicable, with the applicable provisions of this subpart. This provision does not require that inaccessible vehicles be retrofitted with lifts, ramps or other boarding devices.
( c ) Requirements for vehicles and systems not covered by this part shall be determined on a case-by-case basis by the Department of Transportation in consultation with the U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board).
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 5/27/15 9:05 AM

Received: May 25, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8j20-gcb3

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: API

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0297

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Elizabeth Mooney

Address: 

100-10 Ascan Avenue

Forest Hills, NY, 11375-6812

Email: elizabethvmooney@hotmail.com

Phone: 718 261-6385

General Comment

I am a Baby Boomer approaching retirement. There are just too many financial advisory types 

hanging out shingles, all of which seem to be equal to the average layman. Everyone who gives 

financial advice on retirement accounts should, indeed, adhere to the fiduciary standard and act 

in the best interest of his or her clients. That way, ordinary people won't get duped by fancy 

sounding titles that are, in fact, totally meaningless. Thank you for trying to protect us from 

financial harm.

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481af5736&format=xml&show... 5/27/2015
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 12, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00086

- CV

IN RE MACONORI ENTER PRISES, LTD.

and Nolan Richardson, Individually

Original Manda mus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

Irene Rios , Justice

The Real Pa rties in Interest, Eloy Garcia and Rail Link International, Inc.'s Motion for

Extension of Time to File Response to Relator's Petition for Writ of Mandamus is hereby

GRANTED. Time is extended to April 19, 2018.



### PER CURIA M

ATTESTED TO:

________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proc eeding arises out of Cause No. 2013CI09362 , styled Macanori Enterprises, Ltd. and Nolan Richardson,

Individually v. Rail Link International, Inc. and Eloy Garcia, Individually , pending in the 73rd Judicial District

Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Rosie Alvarado presiding.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF

BROWN ARMSTRONG RANDALL REYES PAULDEN & McCOWN

ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION

 

December 10, 2001 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of Tri-Valley Corporation, on Form S-2, of our report dated February 9, 2001, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Tri-Valley Corporation, for the year ended December 31, 2000, and to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus which is part of this Registration Statement. 

Brown Armstrong 

Randall Reyes 

Paulden & McCown 

Accountancy Corporation
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned certify that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and no purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any
obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Samuel L. Erwin      
|Samuel L. Erwin          
|Chief Executive Officer  
|Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.
|                         
|/s/ Roy D. Jones         
|Roy D. Jones             
|Chief Financial Officer  
|Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.

Dated: May 2, 2011
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0806.html[7/21/2015 2:44:59 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-qb4o

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0806

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Leave MY 401K alone!

I don't care what you do with yours
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, October 30, 1995 (136), Para 136.25 Bills Presented to the President]
[Page 1803]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.136.25  bills presented to the president

  Mr. THOMAS, from the Committee on House Oversight, reported that that 
committee did on the following date present to the President, for his 
approval, bills of the House of the following title:

           On October 26, 1995:
       H.R. 716. An Act to amend the Fishermen's Protective Act.
       H.R. 1026. An Act to designate the U.S. post office 
     building located at 201 East Pikes Peak Avenue in Colorado 
     Springs, CO, as the ``Winfield Scott Stratton Post Office.''
```
§ 374.505 Exceptions. ( a ) Incidental charter rights do not authorize the transportation of passengers to whom the carrier has sold individual tickets or with whom the carrier has made separate and individual transportation arrangements.
( b ) Service provided under incidental charter rights may not be operated between the same points or over the same route so frequently as to constitute a regular-route service.
( c ) Passenger transportation within the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit District (as defined in the Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Regulation Compact, Pub. L. No. 86-794, 74 Stat. 1031 (1960), as amended by Pub. L. No. 87-767, 76 Stat. (1962) is not authorized by these regulations, but is subject to the jurisdiction and regulations of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Commission.
( d ) A private or public recipient of governmental assistance (within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. 13902(b)(8)) may provide service under incidental charter rights only for special or chartered parties originating in the area in which the private or public recipient provides regularly scheduled mass transportation services under the specific qualifying certificate that confers its incidental charter rights.
[54 FR 46619, Nov. 6, 1989. Redesignated at 61 FR 54709, Oct. 21, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 15423, Apr. 1, 1997]
#### § 236.714 Cab.

The compartment of a locomotive from which the propelling power and power brakes of the train are manually controlled.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7306
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RICHARD COREY HARRISON, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CR-93-418-WMN, CA-95-1230-WMN) Submitted: January 7, 1997 Decided: January 31, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Corey Harrison, Appel lant Pro Se. Bonnie S. Greenberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Harrison , Nos. CR-93-418-WMN; CA-95-1230-WMN (D. Md. Aug. 8, 1996). Appellant's motion to have appeal heard on Appellant's brief is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 896

To ensure the safety of recreational fishermen and other persons who use

motor vehicles to access beaches adjacent to the Brigantine Wilderness

Area in the Edwin B. Forsythe National Wildlife Refuge, New Jersey,

by providing a narrow transition zone above the mean high tide line

where motor vehicles can be safely driven and parked.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 2001

Mr. SAXTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To ensure the safety of recreational fishermen and other

persons who use motor vehicles to access beaches adjacent to the Brigantine Wilderness Area in the Edwin

B. Forsythe National Wildlife Refuge, New Jersey, by

providing a narrow transition zone above the mean high

tide line where motor vehicles can be safely driven and

parked.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 896 IH

1 SECTION 1. MOTOR VEHICLE TRANSITION AREA, BRIGAN2 TINE WILDERNESS AREA, EDWIN B. FOR3 SYTHE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, NEW

4 JERSEY.

5 (a) FINDING.—Section 1(h) of Public Law 93–631

6 (88 Stat. 2153) designated the Brigantine Wilderness

7 Area in the Edwin B. Forsythe National Wildlife Refuge

8 (formerly known as the Brigantine National Wildlife Ref9 uge), New Jersey, and the Secretary of the Interior was

10 directed to prepare a legal description and map to accu11 rately represent the boundaries of the wilderness area as

12 so designated.

13 (b) REVISION OF BOUNDARY REQUIRED.—The Sec14 retary of the Interior shall revise the boundaries of that

15 portion of the Brigantine Wilderness Area located on Long

16 Beach Island in Ocean County, New Jersey, to provide

17 a narrow transition zone between the mean high tide line

18 and the wilderness boundaries (but not less than 30 feet

19 in width) to permit vehicles to safely access and park on

20 the beach without inadvertently entering the wilderness

21 area. The Secretary shall determine the mean high tide

22 line for the area using information available from the

23 State of New Jersey.

24 (c) CONTINUED PROTECTION FOR PIPING PLOV25 ER.—Nothing in subsection (b) shall be construed to alter

26 the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to prohibit
3

•HR 896 IH

1 or restrict public access to that portion of the Edwin B.

2 Forsythe National Wildlife Refuge and Brigantine Wilder3 ness Area on Long Beach Island during the breeding sea4 son of the piping plover.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 393
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 393.102 What are the minimum performance criteria for cargo securement devices and systems? ( a ) *Performance criteria* — ( 1 ) *Breaking strength.* Tiedown assemblies (including chains, wire rope, steel strapping, synthetic webbing, and cordage) and other attachment or fastening devices used to secure articles of cargo to, or in, commercial motor vehicles must be designed, installed, and maintained to ensure that the maximum forces acting on the devices or systems do not exceed the manufacturer's breaking strength rating under the following conditions, applied separately: ( i ) 0.8 g deceleration in the forward direction;
( ii ) 0.5 g acceleration in the rearward direction; and
( iii ) 0.5 g acceleration in a lateral direction.
( 2 ) *Working Load limit.* Tiedown assemblies (including chains, wire rope, steel strapping, synthetic webbing, and cordage) and other attachment or fastening devices used to secure articles of cargo to, or in, commercial motor vehicles must be designed, installed, and maintained to ensure that the forces acting on the devices or systems do not exceed the working load limit for the devices under the following conditions, applied separately: ( i ) 0.435 g deceleration in the forward direction;
( ii ) 0.5 g acceleration in the rearward direction; and
( iii ) 0.25 g acceleration in a lateral direction.
( b ) *Performance criteria for devices to prevent vertical movement of loads that are not contained within the structure of the vehicle.* Securement systems must provide a downward force equivalent to at least 20 percent of the weight of the article of cargo if the article is not fully contained within the structure of the vehicle. If the article is fully contained within the structure of the vehicle, it may be secured in accordance with § 393.106(b).
( c ) *Equivalent means of securement.* The means of securing articles of cargo are considered to meet the performance requirements of this section if the cargo is: ( 1 ) Immobilized, such so that it cannot shift or tip to the extent that the vehicle's stability or maneuverability is adversely affected; or
( 2 ) Transported in a sided vehicle that has walls of adequate strength, such that each article of cargo within the vehicle is in contact with, or sufficiently close to a wall or other articles, so that it cannot shift or tip to the extent that the vehicle's stability or maneuverability is adversely affected; or
( 3 ) Secured in accordance with the applicable requirements of §§ 393.104 through 393.136.
[71 FR 35832, June 22, 2006, as amended at 78 FR 58484, Sept. 24, 2013]
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.11

                             FORM OF CASH BONUS PLAN
                               HEALTHSTREAM, INC.

Methodology

The primary financial measurement underlying our cash bonus plan will be EBITDA.
This measure is intended to allow for comparability between periods and
generally will exclude the impact of non-cash items or accounting changes. If
net revenues are less than 95% of budgeted revenues, management will reduce the
bonus calculations by 5-10 % depending on the extent and circumstances of the
unfavorable variance. Only non-commissioned employees are eligible for
participation in the cash bonus plan.

Method of Bonus Calculation

The calculation is based on the employee's level and role within the company.
Bonus amounts shall be adjusted to reflect movement from commissioned to
non-commissioned roles, as well as leave of absences, employment for less than
the entire year or other changes in roles and responsibilities.

Participant Level descriptions and participation

Once results have exceeded budgeted EBITDA results, bonuses will begin to be
earned. Calculations by participant shall be subject to the following levels and
participation:

Level 1- Includes all positions within the company that generally don't have
         managerial responsibilities as a component of their job description
        (up to 10% of base compensation)

Level 2- Includes positions that have supervisory and/or project
         responsibilities and have the title of Manager (up to 15% of base
         compensation)

Level 3- Includes Business Directors and Vice Presidents (up to 20% of base
         compensation)

Level 4- Includes the CEO and Senior Vice Presidents (up to 25% of base
         compensation)

Bonus Amount - Any payout over the budgeted EBITDA target will be self-funding
(that is to say, bonus payout would represent only a portion of the incremental
EBITDA achievement over budget).

Timing - The Plan will run from January 1 through December 31. A summary of the
plan shall be provided to all employees explaining the plan.

Administration - The plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors.

Payout - On or about March 15 of the following year, contingent upon employment
on the payment date. Management has been granted discretion with regard to
timing of payment for up to 75% of any bonus earned during the first half of the
year for Level 1 and 2 employees.
#### § 374.111 Reports of interference with regulations.

Every motor carrier of passengers subject to 49 U.S.C. subtitle IV, part B operating vehicles in interstate or foreign commerce shall report to the Secretary, within fifteen (15) days of its occurrence, any interference by any person, municipality, county, parish, State, or body politic with its observance of the requirements of these regulations in this part. Such report shall include a statement of the action that such carrier may have taken to eliminate any such interference.

[36 FR 1338, Jan. 28, 1971. Redesignated at 61 FR 54709, Oct. 21, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 15423, Apr. 1, 1997; 81 FR 68345, Oct. 4, 2016]
H. Res. 233

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 5, 2001.

Whereas the United States and Mexico share a special bilateral friendship which is matched by few other countries

in the world;

Whereas the United States and Mexico are partners joined by

geography as well as by a multitude of government-togovernment and private relationships which are of critical

importance to both countries;

Whereas the United States and Mexico share concerns on a

wide range of issues, including trade, immigration, the

environment, economic development, and regional security and stability;

Whereas Vicente Fox Quesada of the Alliance for Change

(consisting of the National Action Party and the Mexican

Green Party) was sworn in as President of the United

Mexican States on December 1, 2000, the first opposition

candidate to be elected president in Mexico in seven decades;

Whereas the United States, as Mexico’s neighbor, ally, and

partner in the hemisphere, has a strong interest in President Fox’s success in promoting prosperity and democracy in his country and the region during his term of office; and
2

•HRES 233 EH

Whereas President Vicente Fox is making a state visit to

Washington, D.C. on September 5–7, 2001: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) welcomes the state visit by the President of the

United Mexican States, Vicente Fox Quesada; and

(2) declares that, in keeping with the just interests

of the United States, the special nature of the relationship between the United States and Mexico should be

further cultivated to the mutual benefit of both countries.

Attest:

Clerk.
Editorial Note on Part 384
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 384 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 384.227 Record of digital image or photograph. The State must: ( a ) Record the digital color image or photograph or black and white laser engraved photograph that is captured as part of the application process and placed on the licensing document of every person who is issued a CDL, as required under § 383.153. The digital color image or photograph or black and white laser engraved photograph must either be made part of the driver history or be linked to the driver history in a separate file.
( b ) Check the digital color image or photograph or black and white laser engraved photograph on record whenever the CDL applicant or holder appears in person to renew, upgrade, or transfer a CDL and when a duplicate CDL is issued.
( c ) Check the digital color image or photograph or black and white laser engraved photograph on record whenever the CLP applicant or holder appears in person to issue, renew or upgrade a CLP and when a duplicate CLP is issued.
( d ) If no digital color image or photograph or black and white laser engraved photograph exists on record, the State must check the photograph or image on the base-license presented with the CLP or CDL application.
[76 FR 26895, May 9, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 17881, Mar. 25, 2013]
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 11/21/14

FROM: Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Discussion of the Clean Power Plan with EPA Region 4 State and Local Energy and 

Environmental Agencies

SUMMARY: 

EPA Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to EPA Region 4 State, Local, and 

Tribal Energy and Environmental Agencies on 8/19/14. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power 

Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA

Ken Mitchell/EPA R4

Keith Goff/EPA R4

Reid Harvey/OAR OAP

Other EPA OAR HQ staff

External Stakeholders

Approximately 28 State and Local Energy and Environmental Agency staff
<PAGE>
 
                                                     Exhibit (21)-2
                                                     Commonwealth Edison Company
                                                     Form 10-K File No. 1-1839



                          Commonwealth Edison Company
                          Subsidiaries of the Company
                          ---------------------------

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                      State or
                                                                    Jurisdiction
                                                                      in Which
                  Name                                              Incorporated
--------------------------------------------                        ------------
<S>                                                                 <C> 
Commonwealth Edison Company of Indiana, Inc.                        Indiana
ComEd Financing I                                                   Delaware
ComEd Financing II                                                  Delaware
Commonwealth Research Corporation                                   Illinois
Concomber, Ltd.                                                     Bermuda
Cotter Corporation                                                  New Mexico
Edison Development Company                                          Delaware
Edison Development Canada Inc.                                      Canada
</TABLE>