alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Quarterly Services    >Information for Respondents
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Quarterly Services - Information for Respondents
  Get Forms
  PDF files of all Current Quarterly Services Survey Forms and Letters
  General Respondent Information
  General information regarding the online reporting, authority, confidentiality, and survey legitamcy of the Quarterly Services Survey
  How to Get Started Frequently Asked Questions
  FAQs regarding getting started with internet reporting
 Last Revised: March 09, 2020


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 21


<TABLE>
                        SUBSIDIARIES OF EKCO GROUP, INC.

         The following are the subsidiaries of the registrant, all of which are
wholly-owned except for Woodstream Corporation, which is majority-owned:

<CAPTION>
                                                                 Jurisdiction of
Subsidiary Name                                                  Incorporation
---------------                                                  ---------------
<S>                                                              <C>
OPERATING SUBSIDIARIES

Ekco Housewares, Inc.                                            Delaware

Ekco Canada Inc.                                                 Ontario, Canada

Ekco Distribution of Illinois, Inc.                              Delaware

Ekco Manufacturing of Ohio, Inc.                                 Delaware

Ekco International Housewares Limited                            United Kingdom

Frem Corporation                                                 Massachusetts

Woodstream Corporation                                           Pennsylvania

Kellogg Brush Manufacturing Co.                                  Massachusetts

Cleaning Specialty Co.                                           Tennessee

Wright-Bernet, Inc.                                              Ohio

B. VIA International Housewares, Inc.                            Delaware



INACTIVE SUBSIDIARIES

Delhi Manufacturing Corporation                                  Delaware

Ekco Capital Enterprises, Inc.                                   Delaware

Ekco Wood Products Co.                                           Delaware

Fenwick                                                          California

FPI, Inc.                                                        Washington

Trappe of Aspen, Inc.                                            Pennsylvania
</TABLE>
From: lwatson0442@sbcglobal.net [mailto:lwatson0442@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:42 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Larry Watson 

1835 Winnebago St Apt 204 

Madison, WI 53704
§ 242.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to ensure that only those persons who meet minimum Federal safety standards serve as conductors, to reduce the rate and number of accidents and incidents and to improve railroad safety.
( b ) This part prescribes minimum Federal safety standards for the eligibility, training, testing, certification and monitoring of all conductors to whom it applies. This part does not restrict a railroad from adopting and enforcing additional or more stringent requirements consistent with this part.
( c ) The conductor certification requirements prescribed in this part apply to any person who meets the definition of conductor contained in § 242.7, regardless of the fact that the person may have a job classification title other than that of conductor.
1210-AB32-2-1302.html[7/26/2015 1:18:11 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvv-un72

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1797

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Don't restrict my 401 k or Ira accounts. I worked hard for them and can plan for my own retirement
Summary of Informal Healthcare Severance Policy



 Exhibit 10.32 
 Summary of Informal Healthcare Severance Policy 
 Knoll has an informal policy of providing continued
healthcare benefits to terminated salaried employees (including, without limitation, our named executive officers) during any period that such employee is entitled to benefits under the formal Knoll, Inc. Severance Pay Plan.
exv10w32



 




EXHIBIT 10.32

LISTING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT #3




     THIS
AGREEMENT, made on November 21, 2002 between EBS Building, L.L.C.
(hereinafter called “OWNER”), and Colliers Turley Martin Tucker (hereinafter
called “BROKER”)



WITNESSETH




     WHEREAS OWNER and BROKER entered into an Exclusive Right to Lease
Agreement dated April 21, 2000 (hereinafter called “AGREEMENT”) for certain
real property known as 501 North Broadway for a term commencing April 21, 2000
and ending October 31, 2001;



     WHEREAS, said Agreement was amended on October 20, 2001 in Listing
Agreement Amendment #1; and further amended on October 24, 2002 in Listing
Agreement Amendment #2; and



     WHEREAS OWNER and BROKER desire to further amend said AGREEMENT,

     NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

     That
said AGREEMENT is amended effective November 30, 2002 as follows:



     Said Listing will be extended for a period of 1 year.



     This Listing Agreement shall expire on November 30, 2003.



     In the event that the property is sold, said AGREEMENT will terminate on
the closing date of the sale.



     That this LISTING AMENDMENT #3 shall be subject to all of the same terms
and conditions contained in the AGREEMENT except as hereinabove stated to the
contrary.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER and BROKER have caused this LISTING AGREEMENT
AMENDMENT #3 to be executed as of the day and year first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ACCEPTED:	 	 	 	 
	(OWNER)

	EBS Building, L.L.C.
	 	(BROKER)
	 	 	by FTI Consulting, Inc.
	 	Colliers Turley Martin Tucker Company
	 
	 	its manager 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	/s/ Keith F. Cooper

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Scott Bazoian
	

	


	 	 	 	
 
	Title:

	Senior Managing Director

	 	Title:
	 	Managing Principal
	Date:

	1/3/03

	 	Date:
	 	11/21/02
	Time:

	 	 	 	Time:
Exhibit 32-5



Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code



The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Report on Form 10-K of Commonwealth Edison Company for the year ended
December 31, 2006, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Commonwealth Edison Company.



|                        |  |                                     
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: February 13, 2007 |  | /s/    FRANK M.
CLARK               
|                        |  | Frank M. Clark                      
|                        |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



413
§ 350.411 How long are High Priority Program funds available to a recipient? ( a ) *Motor carrier safety activities.* High Priority Program funds related to motor carrier safety activities under § 350.403(a) through (g), and (i) through (k) obligated to a recipient are available for the rest of the fiscal year in which the funds are obligated and the next 2 full fiscal years.
( b ) *Innovative Technology Deployment activities.* High Priority Program funds for Innovative Technology Deployment activities under § 350.403(h) obligated to a State are available for the rest of the fiscal year in which the funds were obligated and the next 4 full fiscal years.
[85 FR 37796, June 24, 2020, as amended at 87 FR 59035, Sept. 29, 2022]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7539

ERIC GLENN BANKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

P. NEAL, CO II; WILLIAM WHEATLEY, CO II,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA97-1141-S)

Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 7, 1998

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Glenn Banks, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Wendy Ann Kronmiller, Assistant Attorney General,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Banks v. Neal, No. CA-97-1141-S (D. Md. Sept. 24 & Oct. 1,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2460 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2460

 To amend the Community Services Block Grant Act to redefine the term 
                          ``eligible entity''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 1995

 Mr. Barton of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
       to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Community Services Block Grant Act to redefine the term 
                          ``eligible entity''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF ELIGIBLE ENTITY.

    Section 673(1) of the Community Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 
9902(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(1) The term `eligible entity' means'' 
        and all that follows through ``Public Law 98-139 made a grant 
        under this Act in fiscal year 1984.'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1)(A) The term `eligible entity' means a community based 
        and operated program--
                    ``(i) which mobilizes and utilizes resources, 
                public or private, of any urban or rural, or combined 
                urban and rural, geographical area (referred to this 
                part as a `community', including but not limited to a 
                State, metropolitan area, county, city, town, multicity 
                unit, or multicounty unit in an attack on poverty;
                    ``(ii) which provides services, assistance, and 
                other activities of sufficient scope and size to give 
                promise of progress toward elimination of poverty or a 
                cause or cause of poverty through developing employment 
                opportunities, improving human performance, motivation, 
                and productivity, or bettering the conditions under 
                which people live, learn, and work;
                    ``(iii) which is developed, conducted, and 
                administered with the maximum feasible participation of 
                residents of the areas and members of the groups 
                served; and
                    ``(iv) which is conducted, administered, or 
                coordinated by a public or private nonprofit agency 
                (other than a political party), or combination 
                thereof.''; and
            (2) by inserting ``(B)'' before the text beginning with 
        ``If any geographic area'' and aligning such text as a 
        subparagraph below subparagraph (A) (as inserted by paragraph 
        (1)) and in that text by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), 
        and (C) as clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), respectively.
                                 <all>
```
§ 32.640 Employee. ( a ) *Employee* means the employee of a recipient directly engaged in the performance of work under the award, including— ( 1 ) All direct charge employees;
( 2 ) All indirect charge employees, unless their impact or involvement in the performance of work under the award is insignificant to the performance of the award; and
( 3 ) Temporary personnel and consultants who are directly engaged in the performance of work under the award and who are on the recipient's payroll.
( b ) This definition does not include workers not on the payroll of the recipient (*e.g.,* volunteers, even if used to meet a matching requirement; consultants or independent contractors not on the payroll; or employees of subrecipients or subcontractors in covered workplaces).
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC UIT JUNE 19, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 15337 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D o c k e tN o . 0 5 - 0 0 3 3 7 - C R - J - 2 5 - MMH U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s O S C A R L E E R E E V E S , a .k .a . B o o , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe M i ddl e D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( Ju n e 19, 2008) B efo re M A R C U S , P R Y O R an d H IL L , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M:2

Jam es A . H ernand ez , appo i nt ed coun se l for O sc arL ee R ee ves i n thi s di re ct c r i m i na l appe a l , ha s m ove d t o w i thdr a w f r om f urthe rr e pr e s e nt a t i on of the appe l l a nta nd f

i l e d abr i e f

pur s ua ntt o A nde r s v. C a l i f orni a , 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 13 96 , 18 L . E d. 2d 49 3 (19 67 ). O ur i nd ependentre vi ew of the ent i re r e c o r d r e v e a ls th a t c o u n s e l’s a s s e s s m e n t o f th e r e la tiv e m e r it o f

th e ap p e a l is c o rr e c t. B e c au s e in d e p e n d e n t e x a m in a tio n o f th e e n tir e r e c o r dr e v e a ls n o a r g u ab le i ssu es o f m eri t , co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , an dR ee v es ’s conv i ct i on s and se nt ence s are A FFI R M ED .
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2366

To repeal an unnecessary medical device reporting requirement.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 19, 1995

Mrs. VUCANOVICH (for herself and Mr. WAXMAN) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition

to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To repeal an unnecessary medical device reporting

requirement.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL.

4 Section 1862 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

5 1395y) is amended by striking subsection (h).

Æ
Issue Date A/C Hours RMA # Tracking # Returned date
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0999.html[7/22/2015 6:08:45 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-ohlt

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0999

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Donna Fitzgerald

General Comment

Just to make this short and to the point...I can make my own decisions when it comes to my own retirement. I

 DO NOT want the government to tell me what to do and how to do it.

Thank you!
#### § 371.1 Applicability.

This part applies, to the extent provided therein, to all brokers of transportation by motor vehicle as defined in § 371.2.

[32 FR 20034, Dec. 20, 1967, as amended at 62 FR 15421, Apr. 1, 1997]
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 30, 2014

No. 04-14-00236-CR

Troy CURTIS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR0800A

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

On June 25, 2014, we ordered Appellant to provide written proof to this court by July 7, 

2014 that either court reporter Mary Beth Simpkins’s fee had been paid or that Appellant was 

entitled to appeal without paying for the record. On June 26, 2014, Appellant filed a response 

with this court. Appellant explained that he did not request a record be made by any other court 

reporter than Erminia Uviedo, the reporter responsible for the probation revocation hearing held 

on March 31, 2014. Appellant further explained that Ms. Uviedo’s record, filed on June 10, 

2014, was the record of the only matter being raised on appeal. 

Our June 25, 2014 show cause order is satisfied. Appellant’s brief is due to be filed no 

later than July 10, 2014.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of June, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR E N B ANC R ECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Vicsandra Jones and Darren Jones, individually and as next friend s of

John Doe, a minor v. Josi Calderon Shipley

Appellate ca se number: 01

- 16

- 00046

- CV

Trial court case number: 2015

- 56901

Trial court: 61st District Court of Harris County

It is ordered that Appellants’ Motion for En Banc Reconsideration is denied

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

Acting for the E n Banc Court*

Date: January 3 1 , 2017

*En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland,

Massengale, Brown, Huddle, and Lloyd.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 6/24/15 9:48 PM

Received: June 24, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jlu-vnn9

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0330

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: kurt cambier

Address: 

13984 W Bowles Ave Suite 200

littleton, 80123

Email: kcambier@cambridgeresource.com

Phone: 3032711067

General Comment

RIN 1210-AB32 My name is Kurt Cambier CFP ChFC, practicing out of Littleton Colorado. I 

am writing this to express my thoughts on the new rules being considered by the DOL. As a 

CFP I have been operating under a higher fiduciary standard than the industry as a whole, so I 

understand the DOL desire to make everyone operate at a higher standard then what has 

traditionally been the case. However the devil is in the details in this proposal, well intended I 

believe but highly flawed. While the fees, costs of an investment can operate as a drag it isn't 

the biggest hurdle the investor may face. The biggest enemy to an investor is the investor 

themselves. Lets take a look at a ground breaking white paper written by Vanguard Funds titled 

"Putting a value on your value Quantifying Vanguard Advisers Alpha. The value added is a 

PLUS 3%, that an adviser adds to a client return not a negative. Its broken down this way 

having an advisers adds 1.5% to returns through proper guidance helping clients avoiding 

investing mistakes{Irrational emotional behaviors}. an adviser adds between 0-.75% in proper 

portfolio construction, and 0-.75% in wealth management. The study totals an advisers value at 

3% more return for an investor using an adviser as compared to those who don't. As a CFP, 

ChFC I can assure you my clients find me as a huge asset not a liability to their own financial 

well being. As written this proposal would substantially harm the future lives of those you 

Page 1 of 2

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b52c64&format=xml&show... 6/24/2015
intend to help. The unintended consequences of the devil in the details. Thank You Kurt 

Cambier CFP CfHC

Page 2 of 2

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b52c64&format=xml&show... 6/24/2015