alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RegeneRx (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Neil Lyons, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in this report.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2006



/s/ C. Neil LyonsC. Neil LyonsChief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 386
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 386 appear at 65 FR 7755, Feb. 16, 2000, and 88 FR 80182, Nov. 17, 2023.

§ 386.43 Production of documents and other evidence; entry upon land for inspection and other purposes; and physical and mental examination. ( a ) Any party may serve on any other party a request to: ( 1 ) Produce and permit the party making the request, or a person acting on his or her behalf, to inspect and copy any designated documents, or to inspect and copy, test, or sample any tangible things which are in the possession, custody, or control of the party upon whom the request is served; or
( 2 ) Permit entry upon designated land or other property in the possession or control of the party upon whom the request is served for the purpose of inspection and measuring, photographing, testing, or for other purposes as stated in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( 3 ) Submit to a physical or mental examination by a physician.
( b ) The request may be served on any party without leave of the Agency Decisionmaker or administrative law judge.
( c ) The request shall: ( 1 ) Set forth the items to be inspected either by individual item or category;
( 2 ) Describe each item or category with reasonable particularity;
( 3 ) Specify a reasonable time, place, and manner of making the inspection and performing the related acts;
( 4 ) Specify the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the physical or mental examination and the person or persons by whom it is to be made. A report of examining physician shall be made in accordance with Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, title 28, U.S. Code, as amended.
( d ) The party upon whom the request is served shall serve on the party submitting the request a written response within 30 days after service of the request.
( e ) The response shall state, with respect to each item or category: ( 1 ) That inspection and related activities will be permitted as requested; or
( 2 ) That objection is made in whole or in part, in which case the reasons for objection shall be stated.
( f ) A copy of each request for production and each written response shall be served on all parties and filed with the Agency Decisionmaker or the administrative law judge, if one has been appointed.
§ 375.605 How must I notify an individual shipper of any service delays? ( a ) When you are unable to perform either the pickup or delivery of a shipment on the dates or during the periods specified in the bill of lading and as soon as the delay becomes apparent to you, you must notify the individual shipper of the delay, at your expense, in one of the following six ways: ( 1 ) By telephone.
( 2 ) In person.
( 3 ) Fax transmissions.
( 4 ) E-mail.
( 5 ) Overnight courier.
( 6 ) Certified mail, return receipt requested.
( b ) You must advise the individual shipper of the dates or periods you expect to be able to pick up and/or deliver the shipment. You must consider the needs of the individual shipper in your advisement. You also must do the following four things: ( 1 ) You must prepare a written record of the date, time, and manner of notification.
( 2 ) You must prepare a written record of your amended date or period for pick-up or delivery.
( 3 ) You must retain these records as a part of your file on the shipment. The retention period is one year from the date of notification.
( 4 ) You must furnish a copy of the notice to the individual shipper by first class mail or in person if the individual shipper requests a copy of the notice.
[68 FR 35091, June 11, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 10576, Mar. 5, 2004; 87 FR 24448, Apr. 26, 2022]
-----Original Message----- 

From: carolynlmorse@aol.com [mailto:carolynlmorse@aol.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 8:23 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Carolyn L Morse 

545 B Lakeside Dr. se 

Grand Rapids, MI 49506
§ 269.13 Award. ( a ) *Award.* FRA will execute a contract with a winning bidder that is not or does not include Amtrak, consistent with the requirements of this section and as FRA may otherwise require, not later than 270 days after the bid deadline established by § 269.9(b).
( b ) *Contract requirements.* Among other things, the contract between FRA and a winning bidder that is not or does not include Amtrak must: ( 1 ) Award to the winning bidder the right and obligation to provide intercity passenger rail transportation over that route subject to such performance standards as FRA may require for a duration consistent with § 269.3(b);
( 2 ) Award to the winning bidder an operating subsidy, as determined by FRA and based on Amtrak's final audited publically-reported fully-allocated operating costs of the route for the prior fiscal year, excluding costs related to Other Postretirement Employee Benefits, Amtrak Performance Tracking System Asset Allocations, Project Related Costs, and Amtrak Office of Inspector General activities, subject to the availability of funding, for the first year at a level that does not exceed 90 percent of the level in effect for that specific route during the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year in which the petition was received, adjusted for inflation;
( 3 ) State that any award of an operating subsidy is made annually, is subject to the availability of funding, and is based on the amount calculated under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, adjusted for inflation;
( 4 ) Condition the operating and subsidy rights upon the winning bidder providing intercity passenger rail transportation over the route that is no less frequent, nor over a shorter distance, than Amtrak provided on that route before the award;
( 5 ) Condition the operating and subsidy rights upon the winning bidder's compliance with performance standards FRA may require, but which, at a minimum, must meet or exceed the performance required of or achieved by Amtrak on the applicable route during the fiscal year immediately preceding the year the bid is submitted;
( 6 ) Subject the winning bidder to the grant conditions established by 49 U.S.C. 24405; and
( 7 ) Subject the winning bidder to the requirements of the appropriations act(s) funding the contract.
( c ) *Publication.* The winning bidder shall make their bid available to the public after the bid award with any appropriate redactions for confidential or proprietary information.
-----Original Message----- 

From: foxerine@yahoo.com [mailto:foxerine@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:33 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ilana Rosenfield 

3720 Carmel View Rd 

San Diego, CA 92130
1210-AB32-2-1154.html[7/24/2015 7:01:05 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvr-bu35

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1648

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Back off. I can take care of myself and leave my money alone!
Director Resignation Agreement



 Exhibit 10.19 
 DIRECTOR RESIGNATION AGREEMENT 
 This Director Resignation Agreement (the “Resignation Agreement”)
dated as of March 7, 2006, is by and between Northstar Neuroscience, Inc., a Washington corporation (the “Company”), and Seth A. Rudnick, who is a director of the Company (the “Director”). 
 RECITALS 
 A. The Company is proposing
to file a registration statement on Form S-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the initial public offering of its common stock (the “IPO”). 
 B. The Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has approved an appointment of Albert J. Graf and Robert E. McNamara to the Board effective upon the closing of the IPO. 
 C. In furtherance of one of such appointments the Board has approved this Resignation Agreement, pursuant to which the Director agrees to tender his
resignation effective immediately prior to the closing of the IPO. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Director hereby agrees as follows: 
 AGREEMENT 
 1. Agreement to Resign. The
Director hereby agrees to tenders his resignation from the Board effective immediately prior to the closing of the IPO. At such time, the Director shall execute and deliver to the Company the written resignation in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit A. 
 2. Miscellaneous. 
 (a) This Resignation Agreement may be executed in two counterparts, including facsimile counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but both of which taken together will constitute one and the same document. 
 (b) This Resignation Agreement is governed by, and will be construed in accordance with, the law of the State of Washington without regard to principles
of conflict of laws. 
  

									
	NORTHSTAR NEUROSCIENCE, INC.	 		 	DIRECTOR
				
	By:	 	/s/ Alan J. Levy	 		 	/s/ Seth A. Rudnick
	Name: Alan J. Levy	 		 	Seth A. Rudnick
	Its: President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.11
                           Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc.
                                  1370 Broadway
                               New York, NY 10018

March 21,2006

Alliance Distributors Holding, Inc.
15-15 132nd Street
College Point NY 11356

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We refer to the Amended and Restated Financing Agreement entered into between us
dated November 11, 2004, as assumed by you on November 30, 2004, and as amended
(the "Financing Agreement").

It is agreed that effective December 31, 2005, Section 6.9 of the Financing
Agreement shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:

         "6.9 Borrower shall until payment in full of all Obligations to Lender
         and termination of this Agreement, cause to be maintained at the end of
         each fiscal quarter (ie, December, March, June, September), Tangible
         Net Worth in an amount not less than $2,900,000, Working Capital of not
         less than $2,000,000 and a ratio of total debt to Tangible Net Worth of
         no greater than 3.25 to 1."

Except as hereinabove specifically set forth, the Financing Agreement shall
remain unmodified and in full force and effect.

This letter supercedes and replaces our letter to you dated March 7, 2006 which
shall be of no further force or effect.


ROSENTHAL & ROSENTHAL, INC.

BY:      ___________________________________
         Ian Brown
         Vice President

AGREED:

ALLIANCE DISTRIBUTORS HOLDING, INC.

BY:      ___________________________________
         Jay Gelman
         Chief Executive Officer
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Retail - Monthly    >FAQs    >Advance Monthly Retail FAQs    >Weather FAQs
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Advance Monthly Retail Trade Survey - Weather FAQs  How much do the areas that had the biggest impact from natural disaster or weather related events typically represent of the nation’s retail and food services sales? Emergency Preparedness
  Does the Census Bureau produce monthly retail and food services sales estimates for the affected sample areas?   As a result of any weather related event, does the Census Bureau modify its usual weighting or estimation methods used to produce advance monthly sales estimates?   Are any estimates ever withheld or delayed because of data collection problems related to weather events?   Can the reliability of the advance monthly sales estimates change because of weather related events?   Does the Census Bureau alter the procedures for developing seasonally adjusted estimates for the Advance Monthly Sales for Retail and Food Services?   How do weather events impact the Census Bureau’s ability to collect data from respondents?   How does the Census Bureau determine the impact of weather related events on the companies?   What activities does the Census Bureau plan to ensure the affected areas will continue to be accurately represented?   Does this survey include retail and food service establishments in U.S. Territories?


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
H. Res. 273

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 31, 2001.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 2647) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002,

and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The

conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
1210-AB32-2-1640.html[7/26/2015 9:21:33 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jy1-1rgx

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2138

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

The Federal Government must stop regulating our Freedoms, Liberities and our MONEY. No to the Obama

 Administration having any regulations on Legal American Citizes' Retirement Money. Stop stealing from the

 American people.
-----Original Message-----

From: Frank Benischeck [mailto:frank.benischeck@gmail.com] 

Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:27 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Changing fiduciary definition 

I am very disappointed in your approach to change what has previously been a way millions of 

Americans can be serviced and helped.

This new effort to force and redefine fiduciary relationship will not help millions of Americans. They will 

not get the type of planning and help they need. 

Sincerely,

Frank Benischeck 

Sent from my iPhone
§ 38.35 Public information system. ( a ) Vehicles in excess of 22 feet in length, used in multiple-stop, fixed-route service, shall be equipped with a public address system permitting the driver, or recorded or digitized human speech messages, to announce stops and provide other passenger information within the vehicle.
( b ) [Reserved]
§ 570.62 Tires. ( a ) *Tread depth.* The tread shall be not less than four thirty-seconds of an inch deep on each front tire of any vehicle other than a trailer and not less than two thirty-seconds of an inch on all other tires. ( 1 ) *Inspection procedure.* For tires with treadwear indicators, check for indicators in any two adjacent major grooves at three locations spaced approximately 120° apart around the circumference of the tire. For tires without treadwear indicators, measure the tread depth with a suitable gauge or scale in two adjacent major grooves at 3 locations spaced approximately 120° apart around the circumference of the tire at the area of greatest wear.
( b ) *Type.* Vehicles should be equipped with tires on the same axle that are matched in construction and tire size designation, and dual tires shall be matched for overall diameter within one-half inch. ( 1 ) *Inspection procedure.* Examine visually. A mismatch in size and construction between tires on the same axle, or a major deviation from the size recommended by the vehicle or tire manufacturer, is a cause for rejection. On a dual-tire arrangement the diameter of one of the duals must be within one-half inch of the other as measured by a gauge block inserted between the tire and a caliper.
( c ) *General condition.* Tires shall be free from chunking, bumps, knots, or bulges evidencing cord, ply or tread separation from the casing. ( 1 ) *Inspection procedure.* Examine visually for the conditions indicated.
( d ) *Damage.* Tire cords or belting materials shall not be exposed, either to the naked eye or when cuts on the tire are probed. Reinforcement repairs to the cord body are allowable on tires other than front-mounted tires. ( 1 ) *Inspection procedure.* Examine visually for the conditions indicated, using a blunt instrument if necessary to probe cuts and abrasions.
( e ) *Special purpose tires.* Tires marked “Not For Highway Use” or “Farm Use Only” or other such restrictions shall not be used on any motor vehicles operating on public highways. ( 1 ) *Inspection procedure.* Examine visually for tires labeled with specific restrictions.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1216.html[7/22/2015 3:57:30 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-bbth

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1216

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Carla Chesney

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan for my own retirement. I do not need Government to make decisions for me. God

 Bless America.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 18



                                                               December 31, 1996


Bell Atlantic-Washington D.C., Inc.
1710 H. Street, N.W.
11th Floor
Washington, DC 20006

We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your 
Form 10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have read management's justification for the change in accounting from the
"amortization" revenue recognition method to the "point of publication" method
contained in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.
Based on our reading of the data and discussions with Company officials of the
business judgment and business planning factors relating to the change, we
believe management's justification is reasonable.  Accordingly, we concur that
the newly adopted accounting principle described above is preferable in the
Company's circumstances to the method previously applied.



/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
#### The Colored Home and Hospital, Appellant, v. John McKinn and another, Respondents.

Order denying motion reversed, and injunction as modified continued, with costs of appeal and disbursements. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
#### Morris Rosenthal, Respondent, v. Henry Benjamin, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
#### Winifred Cooper, *Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v.*The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, *Respondent.*

Order setting aside verdict and dismissing complaint and judgment thereon reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Pratt, J., not sitting.
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–306 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT 

TO THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES COMMITTEE 

NOVEMBER 17, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 563] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 563, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any special rule 

reported on the legislative day of November 18, 2005, providing for 

consideration or disposition of any of the following measures: (1) A 

bill or joint resolution making general appropriations for the fiscal 

year ending September 30, 2006, any amendment thereto, or any 

conference report thereon; (2) A conference report to accompany the 

bill (H.R. 3199) to extend and modify authorities needed to combat 

terrorism, and for other purposes; (3) A bill or joint resolution relating to flood insurance; (4) A bill to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 201 of the concurrent resolution on the budget for 

fiscal year 2006. 

Æ