alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 237 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 74
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 237

                          [Report No. 107-205]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 13, 2001

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of Friday, September 14, 
2001, providing for consideration or disposition of a bill making 
emergency supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 2001 for 
additional disaster assistance, for anti-terrorism initiatives, for 
assistance in the recovery from the tragedy that occurred on September 
11, 2001, and for other purposes, any amendment thereto, any conference 
report thereon, or any amendment reported in disagreement from a 
conference thereon.

                                                  House Calendar No. 74

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 237

                          [Report No. 107-205]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 13, 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: roundabout@ziadial.com [mailto:roundabout@ziadial.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:58 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

michael sweeney 

1404 east country club road 

roswell, NM 88201
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1391.html[7/23/2015 6:35:52 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvn-o4m6

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1391

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Gina Morelli

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan for my own retirement. The government should NOT be allowed to restrict my

 retirement funds. I saved for years and it is my money- not the goverments, so they have no right to restrict!
PUBLIC LAW 109–88—OCT. 7, 2005 119 STAT. 2061

Public Law 109–88

109th Congress

An Act

To provide for community disaster loans.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Disaster Loan Act

of 2005’’.

SEC. 2. DISASTER LOANS.

(a) ESSENTIAL SERVICES.—Of the amounts provided in Public

Law 109–62 for ‘‘Disaster Relief’’, up to $750,000,000 may be transferred to the Disaster Assistance Direct Loan Program for the

cost of direct loans as authorized under section 417 of the Robert

T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C.

5184) to be used to assist local governments in providing essential

services: Provided, That such transfer may be made to subsidize

gross obligations for the principal amount of direct loans not to

exceed $1,000,000,000 under section 417 of the Stafford Act: Provided further, That notwithstanding section 417(b) of the Stafford

Act, the amount of any such loan issued pursuant to this section

may exceed $5,000,000: Provided further, That notwithstanding section 417(c)(1) of the Stafford Act, such loans may not be canceled:

Provided further, That the cost of modifying such loans shall be

as defined in section 502 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974

(2 U.S.C. 661a).

(b) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—Of the amounts provided in

Public Law 109–62 for ‘‘Disaster Relief’’, up to $1,000,000 may

be transferred to the Disaster Assistance Direct Loan Program

Community

Disaster Loan

Act of 2005.

Oct. 7, 2005

[S. 1858]

119 STAT. 2062 PUBLIC LAW 109–88—OCT. 7, 2005

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1858:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

Oct. 7, considered and passed Senate and House.

Æ

for administrative expenses to carry out the direct loan program,

as authorized by section 417 of the Stafford Act.

Approved October 7, 2005.
1210-AB32-2-1292.html[7/24/2015 10:27:43 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvv-xz40

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1787

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Earl Clyburn

General Comment

Get your hands off my 401.
#### Nancy T. Daniels, Respondent, v. Frank M. Derrick, Appellant.

— Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Corlett, J.;

Haight, J., not sitting.
Editorial Note on Part 384
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 384 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 384.206 State record checks. ( a ) *Issuing State's records.* ( 1 ) Before issuing, renewing, or upgrading a CLP or issuing, renewing, upgrading or transferring CDL to any person, the driver's State of record must, within the period of time specified in § 384.232, check its own driver records as follows: ( i ) The driver record of the person in accordance with § 383.73(b)(3)(i) of this chapter; and
( ii ) For a driver who certifies that his/her type of driving is non-excepted, interstate commerce according to § 383.71(b)(1)(i) of this chapter, the medical certification status information on the person's CDLIS driver record.
( 2 ) Based on the findings of its own State record check, the State of record must do one of the following as appropriate: ( i ) Issue, renew, upgrade, or transfer the applicant's CLP or CDL;
( ii ) In the event the State obtains adverse information regarding the applicant, promptly implement the disqualifications, licensing limitations, denials, or penalties that are called for in any applicable section(s) of this subpart; or
( iii ) In the event there is no information regarding the driver's self-certification for driving type required by § 383.71(b)(1), or for a driver who is required by § 383.71(h) to be “certified,” if the medical certification status of the individual is “non-certified,” the State must deny the CDL action requested by the applicant and initiate a downgrade of the CDL, if required by § 383.73(o)(4) of this chapter.
( b ) *Other States' records.* ( 1 ) Before the initial or transfer issuance of a CLP or CDL to a person, and before renewing or upgrading a CLP or CDL held by any person, the issuing State must: ( i ) Require the applicant to provide the names of all States where the applicant has previously been licensed to operate any type of motor vehicle during the previous 10 years.
( ii ) Within the time period specified in § 384.232, request the complete driver record from all States where the applicant was licensed within the previous 10 years to operate any type of motor vehicle.
( 2 ) States receiving a request for the driver record of a person currently or previously licensed by the State must provide the information within 30 days.
( 3 ) Based on the findings of the other State record checks, the issuing State must, in the case of adverse information regarding the applicant, promptly implement the disqualifications, licensing limitations, denials, or penalties that are called for in any applicable section(s) of this subpart.
[76 FR 26894, May 9, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 58480, Sept. 24, 2013; 79 FR 59456, Oct. 2, 2014]
§ 33.91 Records and reports. ( a ) Persons are required to make and preserve for at least three years, accurate and complete records of any transaction covered by this part or an official action.
( b ) Records must be maintained in sufficient detail to permit the determination, upon examination, of whether each transaction complies with the provisions of this part or any official action. However, this part does not specify any particular method or system to be used.
( c ) Records required to be maintained by this part must be made available for examination on demand by duly authorized representatives of the Department of Transportation as provided in § 33.71.
( d ) In addition, persons must develop, maintain, and submit any other records and reports to the Department of Transportation that may be required for the administration of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, and this part.
( e ) Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act, as implemented by Executive Order 13603, provides that information obtained under this section which the Secretary deems confidential, or with reference to which a request for confidential treatment is made by the person furnishing such information, shall not be published or disclosed unless the Secretary determines that the withholding of this information is contrary to the interest of the national defense. Information required to be submitted to the Department of Transportation in connection with the enforcement or administration of the Defense Production Act, this part, or an official action, is deemed to be confidential under section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act and shall be handled in accordance with applicable Federal law.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
      Consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Statement of Operations and
      Retained Deficit and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
      financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              43,009  
<SECURITIES>                                             0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                        2,931  
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0  
<INVENTORY>                                              0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    46,984  
<PP&E>                                                   0  
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      46,984  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               68,336  
<BONDS>                                                  0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0  
<PREFERRED>                                              0  
<COMMON>                                            40,000  
<OTHER-SE>                                         (61,352) 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        46,984  
<SALES>                                                  0  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0  
<CGS>                                                    0  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      177,439  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    (6,245) 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    (497) 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (170,697) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (30,000) 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (140,697) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0  
<CHANGES>                                                0  
<NET-INCOME>                                      (140,697) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.04)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.04)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7822

LEROY ANTHONY JOHNSON,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

THEODIS BECK; DARLENE WHITE,

Respondents – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, 

District Judge. (5:08-hc-02067-D) 

Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 24, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leroy Anthony Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, 

III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Leroy Anthony Johnson seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). A prisoner 

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists 

would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by 

the district court is debatable or wrong and that any 

dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise 

debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently 

reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the 

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Order entered May 18, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00388-CV

ERNEST K. BANKAS, Appellant

V.

MAUREEN BANKAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-09-13471

ORDER

The record in this case is past due. On April 23, 2015, the trial court sustained the 

contest to appellant’s affidavit of indigence. On May 14, 2015, Felicia Pitre, Dallas County 

District Clerk, notified the Court that the clerk’s record has been prepared and is being held for 

non-payment of $181.00. In a letter dated May 14, 2015, this Court instructed appellant to file, 

within ten days, written verification that appellant has paid or made arrangements to pay the 

clerk’s fee. We modify the due date for appellant’s response to JUNE 8, 2015. We caution 

appellant that failure to provide written verification of payment or payment arrangements for the 

clerk’s fee by JUNE 8, 2015 will result in dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).
We ORDER Shantel Beheler, Official Court Reporter for the 301st Judicial District 

Court, to file, by JUNE 8, 2015, either (1) the reporter’s record, (2) written verification that 

appellant has not requested the reporter’s record, or (3) written verification that appellant has not 

paid or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. We caution appellant that if we 

receive written verification of no request or no payment or payment arrangements, we will order 

the appeal submitted without a reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by electronic 

transmission to Felicia Pitre, Shantel Beheler, and counsel for appellee and, by first-class mail to 

appellant.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### § 236.788 Receiver.

A device on a locomotive, so placed that it is in position to be influenced inductively or actuated by an automatic train stop, train control or cab signal roadway element.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1435.html[7/23/2015 11:00:38 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvn-gxn1

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1435

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Claes Tholand

Address:

4414 Hanover Ave.

Richmond, VA, 23221

Email: Claes.Tholand@richmondgov.com

Phone: (804) 647-3740

General Comment

Do not allow the EBSA proposed rule.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50351 Summary Calendar

CEWILLA JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-94-CV-392

- - - - - - - - - - December 4, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Cewilla Johnson appeals from the district court’s judgment affirming the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. She argues that substantial evidence did not exist to support the finding that her mental impairment was not severe and that the administrative law judge failed to properly address her medical diagnosis of schizophrenia. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED forNo. 96-50351 - 2 -

essentially the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Chater , No. A-94-CA-392-SS (W.D. Tex. Apr. 22, 1996). AFFIRMED.
1210-AB32-2-1615.html[7/26/2015 9:03:28 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxy-yoat

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2112

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

We don't need more regulations. I can choose my own retirement account.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 22 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      January 20, 2001.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on House Administration: Mr. Hoyer.
    Committee on Standards of Official Conduct: Mr. Berman.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
`[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 16, 1995 (67), Para 67.6 Medicare Trustees Report]
[Page 701]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.67.6  medicare trustees report

  Mr. THOMAS moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 1590) to 
require the Trustees of the Medicare trust funds to report 
recommendations on resolving projected financial imbalance in Medicare 
trust funds.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, recognized Mr. 
THOMAS and Mr. GIBBONS, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, announced that two-
thirds of the Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  Mr. GIBBONS objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  A quorum not being present,
  The roll was called under clause 4, rule XV, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

Yeas

247

When there appeared

<3-line {>

Nays

170`