TESTING LOCATION 

General 

121 Turners Bend 

Coosa, Georg 

Associates, Inc. 

SW, Suite S 

35120121 

ect No. 2005-0188 

PREPARED FOR 

Ms. Martha West 

General Shale Brick 

3211 N. Roan Street 

Johnson City, Tennessee 3760 

April 2005 

Chris LeMay 

Project Manager 

PREPARED BY 
Coosa, 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Introduction Page 

1.1 Facility & Source Description ........................................................................ 1-1 

1.2 Control Device Description ................................................................................. 1-1 

1.3 Test Team & Contact Information .......................................................................... 1-1 

1.4 Protoc01/Methodology Deviations ........................................................................... 1-1 

Summary of Results ..................................................................................................... 2-1 

Testing Methodology 

3.1 

3.2 

3.3 

3.4 

Volumetric Flow Rate 

........................................................................................ 3-1 

Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide ...................................................................................... 3-1 

Moisture ........................................................................................................ 3-2 

Sulfur Dioxide .................................................................................................. 3-2 

APPENDICES 

Summary of Calculations 

Field Data 

Quality Control Data 

Process Operating Data 

LIST OF TABLES 

Summary of Emission Testing Results 

Source Testing Methodology 

VFR Calculations 

Moisture Calculations 

Emission Calculations 

General Shale Brick 

Compliance Emission Test Report 

Introduction 

1.0 Introduction 

E. Roberts Alley & Associates, Inc. (ERA&A) was retained by General Shale Brick (General Shale) to conduct 

compliance emission testing on the Kiln K2 baghouse exhaust at its Coosa, Georgia (Rome) facility. The purpose of 

the testing was to determine the sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission rate to demonstrate compliance with emission limits 

detailed in the facility's air permit. 

1.1 Facility and Source Description 

General Shale's Rome Facility manufactures brick exterior building material. Shale and clay are mined, crushed 

and sent through a screening process prior to brick forming. The brick is formed by extrusion. Once the brick is 

extruded, it is dried in a green brick dryer and fired in a tunnel Kiln at temperatures exceeding 1,900 degrees Fahrenheit. The Coosa Facility has two (2) kilns (K1 and K2) with a common exhaust. After being fired, the brick 

is cooled, packaged and shipped to various locations. 

1.2 Control System Description 

The Kiln emissions are controlled with a Dustex scrubber and baghouse. The emission testing was performed in the 

Kiln K2 baghouse exhaust duct prior to the common stack for the kilns. 

1.3 Test Team and Contact Information 

The emission testing was conducted by Mr. Jeremy Hutchens, Team Leader, and Mr. Andy Roth, Technician. 

Instrumental test data was recorded on site in ERA&A's mobile laboratory. Ms. Martha West of General Shale 

served as ERA&A's on-site contact and coordinated the testing with facility operations. There were no 

representatives from the Georgia Department of Natural Resources present during the emission testing. 

1.4 Protocol/Method Deviations 

ERA&A conducted a total of four (4) SO2 test runs due to a greater than ten (10) percent increase in volumetric flow 

rate during SO2 test run 2. The SOz test run 2 data was not used to determine the average SO2 emissions. 

c:\\Projects\GeneralShale•Rome\2005 -0188\EmissionTestRepor Page I-1 
Results 
General Shale Brick 

Compliance Emission Test Report 

Summary of Results 

2.0 Smnmary of Results 

ERA&A conducted a total of four (4) SO2 test runs on the Kiln exhaust on March 17, 2005. A summmy of the SO2 emission testing results is detailed in Table 2-1. A full velocity traverse was performed before and after each SO2 

test run. The volumetric flow rate data listed in the table is the arithmetic average of the pre and post velocity traverses. The average of SO2 runs 1, 3 and 4 was used to determine source compliance. Run 2 data was not used to 

determine compliance due to a significant change in flow during the test run. The Run 2 field data is included in 

Appendix B. Any difference between the summary results listed in the following table and the detailed results 

contained in Appendix A is due to rounding for presentation. 

TABLE 2-1 

SUMMARY OF EMISSION TESTING I•SULTS 

Date 3/17/05 3/17/05 3/17/05 

Start Time 9:47 12:31 13:48 

End Time 10:47 13:31 14:48 

Production/Control Device Data 

Production Rate, tons/hr 

Average BH Pressure Drop, inches of WC 

Lime Injection Rate, lbs/hr 

Lime Recycle Rate, lbs/hr 

Volumetric Flow Rate Data 

Temperature, °F 

Velocity, ft/sec 

Moisture, % 

CO2 Concentration, % 

O2 Concentration, % 

VFR, x 104 dscfm 

7.2 7.2 7.2 

2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 

45 45 45 45 

0 0 0 0 

224 196 194 205 

24.0 39.2 39.6 34.3 

4.6 4.6 4.6 

3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 

17.5 17.5 17.5 17,5 

1.I 1.8 1.9 1.6 

Emission Data 

SO2 Concentration, ppmvd 

SO2 Emission Rate, lbs/hr 

SO2 Emission Factor, lbs/ton 

93.5 64.6 65.8 74i6 

10.1 11.8 12.2 1114 

1.4 1.6 1.7 li6 

cA\Projects\GeneralShale\Rome\2005-0188\EmissionTestReport Page 2-1 

121 Tm'n•fs BeM Road; SW | 

General Shale Brick 

Compliance Emission Test Report 

Testing Methodology 

3.0 Testing Methodology 

The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the U.S. EPA Reference Methods snmmarized in 

Table 3-1. Method descriptions and quality assurance data are provided in the referenced appendices. 

TABLE 3-1 

SOURCE TESTING METHODOLOGY 

Volumetric Flow Rate 1-4 

Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide 3A 

Moisture 4 

Sulfur Dioxide 6C 

3.1 

3.2 

3.3 

3.4 

C 

C 

C 

C 

Instrumental Analysis 

Instrumental Analysis 

3.1 Volumetric Flow Rate 

The sampling location and number of traverse points were selected in strict accordance with EPA Reference Method 

1. A total of twenty (20) traverse points were used to determine the average stack gas velocity pressure. The 

velocity of the stack gas was measured in strict accordance with EPA Reference Method 2. The stack gas velocity 

pressure was measured using an S-type pitot and an inclined manometer while the gas temperature was measured 

with a Type-K thermocouple. A complete traverse of the stack was conducted before and after each test run. 

3.2 Oxygen Carbon Dioxide 

The concentrations of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the stack gas were determined in strict accordance with EPA 

Reference Method 3A. The stack gas was withdrawn through a stainless sample probe, heated Teflon sample lines, and gas conditioning system to a CAI Model 200P O2/CO2 analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a noncontact condenser used to remove the stack gas moisture. Data was acquired online and reported in one-minute 

averages. 

An analyzer calibration and system bias check were performed before testing was initiated. A system bias/drift 

check was also conducted following the completion of each 60-minute test run. Additional analyzer calibrations 

were conducted as needed. EPA Protocol calibration gases were used to conduct analyzer calibrations, drift 

checks, and system bias checks. ERA&A also utilized a laboratory and field certified (EPA Method 205) gas 

c:\\Projects\GeneralShale\Rome\2005-0 88kEn ssionTestReport Page 3-1 
Compliance Emission Test R@ort 

•.•,,,• ,4 •,,•;,,,•,,,,•,•, •,. ,•, •6.. Testing Me thodolo• 

dilution system to accurately split high range calibration gas to meet the requirements of EPA Reference Method 

3A. Copies of all calibration gas certificates and Method 205 data can be found in Appendix C. 

3.3 Moisture 

The stack gas moisture content was determined in strict accordance with EPA Method 4 by conducting a 30-minute 

moisture run during each emission test run. The moisture train consisted of a stainless steel probe, clear sample line, 

gas conditioning train, pump, and calibrated dry gas meter. The conditioning train consisted of four (4) impingers. The first two (2) impingers contained 100 mL of water, the third impinger was empty, and the fourth contained 

approximately 200 grams of silica gel. The gas conditioning train contents were either measured gravimetrically or 

volumetrically before and after each test run. 

3.4 Sulfur Dioxide 

The sulfur dioxide testing was conducted in strict accordance with EPA Method 6C. The sampling system consisted 

of a heated stainless steel probe, heated Teflon sample line, non-contact gas conditioning system, Western Research 

Model 72lM SO2 analyzer, and data acquisition system. ERA&A conducted an initial analyzer calibration and 

system bias check before compliance testing commenced. Additional bias/drift checks were conducted following the completion of each test run. A gas divider was used to dilute concentrated EPA Protocol calibration gas to 

obtain the necessary calibration gas concentrations described in Method 6C. The gas divider was calibrated in the 

field in accordance with EPA Method 205 (see Appendix C) prior to conducting any testing. The sulfur dioxide data 

was logged and recorded in one-minute averages. 

c:\\Projects\GeneralShale\Rome\2005-0188\EmissionTestReport Page 3-2 

AssoCiates 

121Tul•ers Bend R0ad; SW 

COOS•i G•61igia 

General Shale Brick 

Compliance Emission Test Report 

Summary of Calculations 

Meter Pressure (Pm), in. Hg 

AH 

Pm Pb + 

13.6 

Pm 29.97 in. Hg + 

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS 

where, Pb barometric pressure, in. Hg 

AH Pressure differential of orifice in. [-120 

2.000 in. H20 30.12 in. Hg 

13.6 in. H20/in. Hg 

Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps), in. Hg 

Ps Pb + Pg 

13.6 

where, 

Ps 29.97 in. Hg + 

-3.00 in.HeO 

13.6 in. H:O/in. Hg 

Pb barometric pressure, in. Hg 

Pg Static Pressure, in. HzO 

29. 75 in. Hg 

Staudard Meter Volume (Vmstd), dscf 

Vmstd 17.647 x Yx Vmx Pm 

Tm 

where, Y meter correction factor 

Vm meter volume, cf 

Pm meter pressure, in. Hg 

Tm meter temperature, °R 

Vmstd 17. 647 °R/in. Hg x 1.008 x 21. 729 cf x 30.12 in. Hg 

523.2 °R 

Vmstd 22.249 dscf 

c:\\Projects\Ge neralShale'•Rmne\2005-0188\EmissionTestReport Page A- 
Cotnpliance Emission Tesl Report 

•:,,'• ',,,,,•. •,•,•,,',',,•,s' tt,.,,/,J, ,•..s:',•.o" Summary of Calculations 

Standard Wet Volume (Vwstd), scf 

Vwstd O. 04707 x Vlc 

where, Vlc volume of HzO collected, ml 

Vwstd =0.04707 fi•/mLx 23.7 mL 1.116 scf 

Moisture Fraction (Bws) 

Bws Vwstd 1.116 scf O. 048 

(Vwstd + Vmstd) 1.116 scf + 22.249 dscf 

where, Vwstd standard wet volume, scf 

Vmstd standard meter volume, dscf 

Moisture Content (MC), % 

Bws BwsxlO0 0.048×100 4.8% 

Molecular Weight (DRY) (Md), Ib/lb-mole 

Md (0. 44 × % C0•) + (0.32 × % 0•) + (0.28 (100 % C0• % 0•)) 

Md (0.44×3.2)+(0.32×1Z5)+(0.28(100-3.2-17.5)) 29.21 lb/lb mole 

where, CO2 Runs 1, 3 & 4 average carbon dioxide concentration, %d 

O• Runs 1, 3 & 4 average oxygen concentration, %d 

Molecular Weight (WET) (Ms), lb/ib-mole 

Ms Md (1 Bws) + 18 (Bws) 

where, Md molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb-mole 

Bws Runs 1, 3 & 4 average moisture fraction, dimensionless 

Ms 29.21 lb/lb mole •l 0.046) + 18 (0.046) 28. 70 lb/lb mole 

Average Velocity (Vs), ft/sec 

/ 

Vs 85. 49 x Cp x •/ Delta P avg. x J 

Ps x Ms 

c:\\Projects\GeneralShale\Rome\2005-0188\EmissionTestReport Page A-2 
General Shale Brick 

Compliance Emission Test Report 

Summary of Calculations 

where, Cp pitot tube coefficient 

Delta P velocity head of stack gas, in. H20 

Ts absolute stack temperature, °R 

Ps absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg 

Ms molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 

Vs 8549 fi [(lb/lb•o-mole)(in. Hg) 

× I 684"0°R 

•ec• (R)(in.H20) 

xO.84xO.384 in. H20 29.75 in. Hgx28.70 lb/lb-mole 

Vs 24. 7 ft/sec 

Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions (Qa), acfm 

Qa 60 × Vs x As 

where, Vs stack gas velocity, ft/sec 

As cross-sectional area of stack, if2 

Qa 60 sec/min x 24. 7 fi/sec x 10.32 fi2 li5E÷ 04 acfm 

Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qs), dscfm 

Qs 17. 64 7 x Qa x (1 Bws) x 

Ps 

where, Qa average stack gas flow at stack conditions, ft3/min 

Bws Runs 1, 3, & 4 average moisture content, dimensionless 

Ps absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg 

Ts absolute stack temperature, °R 

Qs 17. 647°R/in. Hg x 1.5 E + 04 acfm x (1 O. 046) x 

29. 75 in. Hg 

684. 0 °R 

SOz Emission Rates (ERso2), lb/hr 

ERso Cso.,, x MWso,_ x Qs x 60 x 28. 32 

24. 04 x 1. OE + 06 × 454 

c:\\Projects\GeneralShalekRome\2005-0188\EmissionTestReport Page A-3 
Compliance Emission Test Report 

Summary of Calculations 

where, CSO 2 SO 2 concentration, ppmvd 

MWso2 64.1 g/g-mole 

Qs pre/post run average volumetric flow rate, dscfm 

ERso 93.5 uL/L x 64.1 g/g mole x 1.1 E + 04 dscJ• x 60 min/hr x 28. 32 L/cf 

24. 04 L/g mole x 1.0 E + 06 uL/L × 454 g/lb 

lO.1lbs/hr 

SO• Emission Factor (EFso2), Ibs/ton of brick 

ERso2 EFso 2 PR 

where, 

10.1 lbs/hr EFso• .4 lbs / ton 

7. 2 tons/hr 

PR production rate, tons of brick fired/hr 

c:\\Projects\GeneralShale\Rome\2005-0188\EmissionTestRepor Page A-4 
Compliance Emission Test Report 

Summary of Calculations 

TABLE A-1 

VFR CALCULATIONS 

Run Number 2 3 4 5 

Date 3/17/2005 3/17/2005 3/17/2005 3/17/2005 3/17/2005 

Time 9:32 10:48 12:20 13:37 14:50 

Point 0.15 0.18 0.43 0.41 0.39 

Point 2 0.18 0.18 0.45 0.47 0.42 

Point 3 0.20 0.20 0.46 0.48 0.46 

Point 4 0.20 0.19 0.46 0.48 0.48 

Point 5 0.21 0.18 0.46 0.49 0.52 

Point 6 0.20 0.17 0.48 0.49 0.53 

Point 7 0.17 0.15 0.43 0.43 0.48 

Point 8 0.15 0.12 0.39 0.36 0.43 

Point 9 0.14 0.10 0.31 0.32 0.31 

Point 10 0.11 0.09 0.25 0.25 0.25 

Point 11 0.15 0.14 0.49 0.48 0.50 

Point 12 0.18 0.17 0.52 0.54 0.60 

Point 13 0.21 0.18 0.58 0.56 0.60 

Point 14 0.23 0.19 0.62 0.60 0.64 

Point 15 0.23 0.20 0.63 0.66 0.64 

Point 16 0.18 0.17 0.46 0.49 0.50 

Point 17 0.16 0.14 0.39 0.40 0.42 

Point 18 0.15 0.12 0.36 0.35 0.35 

Point 19 0.13 0.11 0.32 0.31 0.31 

Point 20 0.11 0.08 0.26 0.28 0.30 

Square Root of Delta P, (in. H20)•'1⁄2 0.384 0.362 

Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.84 0.84 

Barometric Pressure (Pb), in. Hg 29.97 29.97 

Static Pressure (Pg), in. H20 -3.00 -3.00 

Stack Pressure (Ps), in. Hg 29.75 29.75 

Stack Cross-sectional Area (As), ft 10.32 10.32 

Temperature (Ts), °F 224 224 

Moisture Fraction (Bws) 0.046 0.046 

CO2 Concentration (CO2), % 3.2 3.2 

02 Concentration (O2), % 17.5 17.5 

Molecular Weight (Ms), Ib/lb-mole 28.70 28.70 

Velocity (Vs), ft/sec 24.7 23.3 

Volumetric Flow Rate 

At Stack Conditions (Qa), ACFM 15,275 14,408 

At Standard Conditions (Qs), DSCFM 11,190 10,547 

0.617 0.621 0.630 

0.84 0.84 0.84 

29.97 29.97 29.97 

-7.50 -7.50 -7.50 

29.42 29.42 29.42 

10.32 10.32 10.32 

193 198 189 

0.046 0.046 0.046 

3.2 3.2 3.2 

17.5 17.5 17.5 

28.70 28.70 28.70 

39.0 39.4 39.7 

24,137 24,367 24,575 

18,315 18,344 18,754 

c:\\Projects\GeneralS hale•Rome\2005-0188\EmissionTestReport Page A-5 
General Shale Brick 

Compliance Emission Test Report 

Summary of Calculations 

TABLE A-2 

MOISTURE CALCULATIONS 

Run Number 3 

Date 3/17/2005 3/17/2005 

Time 947-1017 1231-1301 

Run Time, min 

Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 

Meter Correction Factor 

Orifice Calibration Value 

(e) 

(Pb) 

(Y) 

(Delta H@) 

(Vm) 

30 

29.97 

1.008 

1.968 

3O 

29.97 

1.008 

1.968 

4 Mean 

3/17/2005 

1353-1423 

Volume H20 Collected, mL (Vlc) 18.9 

Standard Meter Volume, ft (Vmstd) 22.249 22.328 

Standard Water Volume, ft (Vwstd) 1.116 0.890 

Moisture Fraction (Measnred) (BWS) 0.048 0.038 

3O 

29.97 

1.008 

1.968 

3O 

29.97 

1.008 

1.968 

Meter Volume, ft 21.729 22.023 22.202 21.985 

Meter Temperature, °F (Tm) 63.2 68.4 68.3 66.6 

Meter Orifice Pressure, in. H20 (Delta H) 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 

23.7 26.0 22.9 

22.514 22.364 

1.224 1.076 

0.052 0.046 

c:\\Proj ects\GeneralShale\Rome\2005-0188\EmissionTestReport Page A-6 
Compliance Emission Test Report 

Summary of Calculations 

TABLE A-3 

EMISSION CALCULATIONS 

Run Number 3 4 Mean 

Date 3/17/2005 3/17/2005 3/17/2005 

Time 947-1047 1231-1331 1348-1448 

Run Time, rain (o) 60 60 60 

Production Rate, tons of brick fired/hr 

Barometric Pressure, in Hg 

Volumetric Flow Rate, dscfm 

SO2 Concentration, ppmvd 

(PR) 

(Pb) 

(Qs) 

(Cso2) 

7.2 

29.97 

10,868 

93.5 

7.2 

29.97 

18,330 

64.6 

7.2 

29.97 

18,549 

65.8 

6O 

7.2 

29.97 

15,916 

74.6 

SO2 Emission Rate, lb/hr (ERso2) 10.1 11.8 12.2 11.4 

SO2 Emission Factor, lb/ton of brick (EFso2) 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.6 

c:\\Projects\GeneralShale•Rome\2005-0188\EmissionTestReport Page A-7 
Appendix B 
GENERAL SHALE 

KILN 2 

RUN 1 

DATE: 3/17/2005 

ERA&A Analyzers 

Time 02 CO2 SO2 

9:47:00 16.4 3.8 107.8 

9:48:00 16.4 3.8 108.5 

9:49:00 16.4 3.9 107.5 

9:50:00 16.4 4.0 107,0 

9:51:00 16.3 4.0 106.1 

9:52:00 16.4 4.0 104,5 

9:53:00 16.4 4.0 102.3 

9:54:00 16.4 4.0 101.3 

9:55:00 16.4 4.0 99.9 

9:56:00 16.4 4.0 98.3 

9:57:00 16.4 4,0 96.0 

9:58:00 16.4 4.0 95.5 

9:59:00 16.4 4.0 94,3 

10:00:00 16.4 4.0 93.0 

10:0t:00 16.3 4.1 93.6 

10:02:00 16.3 4.1 94.9 

10:03:00 16.3 4.1 92.0 

10:04:00 17.0 3.6 85.0 

10:05:00 18.6 2.6 47.2 

10:06:00 17.6 3.2 63.5 

10:07:00 16.1 4.2 91.5 

10:08:00 15.9 4.4 99.8 

10:09:00 16,0 4.3 101.1 

10:10:00 16.0 4.3 101.8 

10:11:00 16.1 4.3 101.8 

10:12:00 16.1 4.3 102.3 

10:13:00 16.2 4.3 100.4 

10:14:00 16.3 4.2 97.6 

10:15:00 16.3 4.3 97.1 

t0:16:00 16.4 4.3 96.3 

10:17:00 16.4 4.2 95,1 

10:18:00 16.5 4.2 94.0 

10:19:00 16.5 4.2 93.6 

10:20:00 16,6 4.2 92.9 

10:21:00 16.6 4.0 92.3 

10:22:00 16.6 4.0 91.2 

10:23:00 16.6 4.0 90.4 

10:24:00 16.7 4.0 90.0 

10:25:00 16.7 4.0 89.4 

10:26:00 16.7 4.0 88.8 

10:27:00 16.7 4.0 88.3 

10:28:00 16.7 4,0 88.0 

10:29:00 16.7 4.0 87.7 

10:30:00 16.7 4.0 87.3 

10:31:00 16,7 4.0 87.2 

10:32:00 16.7 4.0 87.2 

10:33:00 16.7 4.0 86.9 

10:34:00 16.7 4,0 86.6 

10:35:00 16.7 4.0 87.0 

10:36:00 16.7 4,0 85.9 

10:37:00 16.8 3.9 85.2 

10;38:00 16.7 3.9 85.4 

10:39:00 16.7 3.9 85.9 

10:40:00 17.3 3.6 81.0 

10:41:00 18.6 2.6 46,7 

10:42:00 17.7 3.2 59.3 

10:43:00 16.2 4.2 86.5 

10:44:00 16.0 4.3 99,4 

10:45:00 16.6 4.0 92.1 

10:46:00 16.9 3.8 85.6 

Uncorrected Average 

02 16.6 % 

CO2 4.0 % 

SO2 91,4 ppmvd 

Corrected Average 

02 16.6 % 

CO2 4.0 % 

SO2 93.5 ppmvd 
GENERAL SHALE 

K•LN 2 

RUN 2 

DATE: 3/17/2005 

ERA&A Analyzers 

Time (32 CO2 SO2 

11:13:00 16.1 4.0 116.3 

11:14:00 16.0 4.0 115.7 

11:15:00 16.1 4.0 108.8 

11:16:00 16.8 3.5 99.4 02 

11:17:00 18,4 2.3 55.2 CO2 

11:16:00 17.4 3.0 75.3 SO2 

11:19:00 t5,8 4,3 101.4 

11:20:00 15,5 4.5 106.4 

11:21:00 15.4 4.6 105.6 

11:22:00 15.1 4.8 112.8 

11:23:00 15.2 4.7 111.9 (32 

11:24:00 15.2 4.8 110.8 CO2 

11:25:00 15,3 4.7 110.4 SQ2 

11:26:00 15.7 4.4 102.3 

11:27:00 15.8 4.4 100.7 

11:28:00 15.8 4.4 100.3 

11:29:00 15.8 4.3 99.0 

11:30:00 16.2 4.1 96.5 

11:31:00 17.4 3.2 75.8 

11:32:00 17.7 3.0 68.5 

11:33:00 17.7 3.0 67.6 

11:34:00 17.7 3.0 67.3 

11:35:00 17.7 3.0 67.7 

11:36:00 I7,9 2.9 65.1 

11:37:00 18.0 2.8 62.8 

11:38:00 17.9 2.8 62.7 

11:39:00 17.9 2.9 63.3 

11:40:00 17.9 2.9 63.6 

11:41:00 17.9 2.8 63.4 

11:42:00 17.8 2.9 66.0 

11:43:00 18.0 2.7 65.9 

11:44:00 18.1 2.7 63.4 

11:45:00 18.2 2.6 61.3 

11:46:00 18.1 2.7 59.8 

11:47:00 18,0 2.8 62.4 

11:48:00 18,0 2.7 62.6 

11:49:00 18.0 2.7 61.9 

11:50:00 18.0 2.7 62.4 

11:51:00 18.1 2.7 62.1 

11:52:00 18.8 2.2 54.1 

11:53:00 19.4 1.7 32.9 

11:54:00 18.6 2.3 53.1 

11:55:00 17.7 3.0 67.4 

11:56:00 17.7 3.0 71.6 

11:57:00 17.7 3.0 70.3 

11:58:00 17.8 2.9 67.6 

11:59:00 17.7 2.9 66.7 

12:00:00 17.7 2.9 67,3 

12:01:00 17.8 2.9 66.9 

12:02:00 17.8 2.9 66.1 

12:03:00 17.8 2.9 66.1 

12:04:00 17.8 2,9 66.6 

12:05:00 17.9 2.8 66.3 

12;06:00 17.9 2,8 65.5 

12:07:00 17.9 2.8 66.3 

12:08:00 17.9 2.8 66.7 

12:09:00 17.9 2.8 65.9 

12:10;00 17.9 2.8 66.5 

12:11:00 17.9 2.8 66.2 

Uncorrected Average 

17.4 % 

3.2 % 

75.5 ppmvd 

Corrected Average 

17,4 % 

3.2 % 

76.3 ppmvd 

1-1 
GENERAL SHALE 

KILN 2 

RUN 3 

DATE: 3117/2005 

ERA&A Analyzers 

Time 02 CO2 SO2 

12:31:00 17.7 2.9 62.8 

12:32:00 17.7 2.9 68.6 

12:33:00 17.7 2.9 70,3 

12:34:00 17.7 2.9 71,3 

12:35:00 17.7 2.9 72.1 

12:36:00 17.7 2.9 74.1 

12:37:00 17.8 2.8 82.6 

12:38:00 17.8 2.8 73,6 

12:39:00 17.8 2.8 70.9 

12:40:00 17.8 2.8 68.8 

12:41:00 17.9 2.8 67.8 

12:42:00 17.9 2.8 66.8 

12:43:00 17.9 2.8 66.5 

12:44:00 17.9 2.7 65.5 

12:45:00 18.0 2.7 65.1 

12:46:00 18.0 2.7 64.0 

12:47:00 18.0 2.7 63.8 

12:48:00 18.0 2.7 62,6 

12:49:00 18.0 2,7 62.5 

12:50:00 18.0 2.7 63.0 

12:51:00 18.0 2.7 62.8 

12:52:00 18.0 2.7 62.2 

12:53:00 18.0 2.7 61.7 

12:54:00 18.0 2.7 61.6 

12:55:00 18.0 2.7 60,9 

12:56:00 17.8 2.9 65.2 

12:57:00 17.9 2.8 67.0 

12:58:00 18.2 2.6 63.5 

12:59:00 18.4 2.5 59.7 

13:00:00 18.4 2.4 58.1 

13:01:00 18.5 2.4 57,2 

13:02:00 18.5 2.4 56,3 

13:03:00 18.6 2.4 55.8 

13:04:00 19,5 1,7 41.8 

13:05:00 19.7 1.6 26.9 

13:06:00 18.4 2.5 56.9 

13:07:00 18.2 2.7 63,5 

13:08:00 18.2 2.6 63,6 

13:09:00 18.3 2.6 65.2 

13:10:00 18.3 2.6 66.8 

13:11:00 18.2 2.7 69.2 

13:12:00 18.2 2.6 70.4 

13:13:00 18.2 2.6 -/0.4 

13:14:00 18.3 2.6 70.3 

13:15:00 18.3 2,6 69.4 

13:16:00 18.2 2.6 69.6 

13:17:00 18.3 2.6 69.0 

13:18:00 18.4 2.5 66.2 

13:19:00 18.4 2.5 64.3 

13:20:00 18.3 2.5 63.2 

13:21:00 18.2 2.6 63.0 

13:22:00 18.1 2.7 64.6 

13:23:00 18,1 2,7 64.4 

13:24:00 18.0 2.7 64.5 

13:25:00 18.0 2,8 64.9 

13:26:00 18,0 2.8 64.1 

13:27:00 18.0 2.8 63.0 

13:28:00 18.0 2.8 63.2 

13:29:00 18.0 2.8 62.8 

13:30:00 18.0 2,8 61.6 

Uncorrected Average 

02 

CO2 

SO2 

t8.1 

2.6 

64.3 

% 

% 

ppmvd 

Corrected Average 

O2 18.1 % 

CO2 2.6 % 

SO2 64.6 ppmvd 

1-1 
GENERAL SHALE 

KILN 2 

RUN 4 

DATE: 3/17/2005 

ERA&A Analyzers 

Time 02 CO2 SO2 

13:48:00 17,5 3.1 71.4 

13:49:00 17.5 3.2 73.7 

13:50:00 17.5 3.1 74.5 

13:51:00 17.6 3.1 75.0 

13:52:00 17.6 3.1 74.6 

13:53:00 17.5 3.1 78.5 

13:54:00 17.7 3.0 74.7 

13:55:00 17.7 3.0 75.6 

13:56:00 17.8 2.9 69,6 

13:57:00 17.8 2.9 66.5 

13:58:00 17.8 2.9 65.7 

13:59:00 17.9 2.9 64.2 

14:00:00 17.9 2.9 63,5 

14:01:00 17.9 2.9 63.7 

14:02:00 17.9 2.9 63.7 

14:03:00 17.9 2.9 63.6 

14:04:00 17.9 2.9 63.4 

14:05:00 17.9 2.9 62.7 

14:06:00 17.8 2.9 63.6 

14:07:00 17.9 2.9 63.9 

14:08:00 17.9 2.9 63.3 

14:09:00 17.9 2.9 62,4 

14:10:00 17.9 2.9 62,1 

14:11:00 17.9 2.9 62,1 

14:12:00 17.9 2.9 62.1 

14:13:00 17.9 2.9 62,0 

14:14:00 18.0 2.9 61,7 

14:15:00 18.0 2.8 61.3 

14:16:00 18.8 2.3 51.7 

14:17:00 19.4 1.8 30.9 

14:18:00 18.4 2.6 52.6 

14:19:00 17.6 3.2 66.3 

14:20:00 17.6 3.1 67.8 

14:21:00 17.7 3.1 67.2 

14:22:00 17,6 3.1 67.6 

14:23:00 17.6 3.1 67.7 

14:24:00 I7.7 3.1 68.3 

14:25:00 17,7 3.1 67.7 

14:26:00 17.7 3.1 66,5 

14:27:00 17.7 3.1 67.5 

14:28:00 17.7 3.1 67.6 

14:29:00 17.8 3.1 67.8 

14:30:00 17,8 3.0 66.8 

14:31:00 17.8 3.0 66.4 

14:32:00 17.8 3.1 66.6 

14:33:00 17.9 3,0 66.5 

14:34:00 17.9 3,0 66,1 

14:35:00 17.9 3.0 65.4 

14:36:00 17.9 3,0 65.5 

14:37:00 17.9 3.0 65,6 

14:38:00 18.0 3,0 64.7 

14:39:00 17.9 3.0 64.6 

14:40:00 17.9 3,0 64.6 

14:41:00 17.9 3.0 64.4 

14:42:00 18.0 2.9 64.1 

14:43:00 18.0 2.9 62.5 

14:44:00 18,0 3.0 63.0 

14:45:00 18.0 3,0 63.5 

14:46:00 18.0 3.0 63.3 

14:47:00 18.0 2,9 63.2 

Uncorrected Average 

02 

CO2 

SO2 

17.9 

3.0 

65.2 

% 

% 

ppmvd 

Corrected Average 

02 17.9 % 

C02 3.0 % 

S02 65,8 ppmvd 

1-1 
VELOCGY TF@ .VERSE DATA 

DUCT DATA 

Dist from far wall Equivalent diameter 

to outside of port 'T.• "• in 2 x ,depth x width 

Nipple length • •" in depth + width 

Depth of duct • _'• ,.,•- in 

Width of duct(rec) in 

Area of duct O .•, ;• in 

Dist from ports to 

nearest disturbance 

up- down- 

$[ream stream 

dia _E•_ •o 

LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS 

Distance upstreana of distttrbance 

1.0 1.5 2.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 

20 24" L• <24- 

8•t 8 t•4 567 

Distance downstream from disturbance 

CIRCULAR DUCTS 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

1;I 

i:2 

Traverse 

point 

number 

on a 

diameter 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

14.6 6.7 4.4 3.2 

85,4 25.0 14.6 10.5 

75.0 29.6 19.4 

93.3 70.4 32.3 

87.4 67.7 

95.6 80,6 

89.5 

96.8 

(Percent of stack diameter from 

inside wall to traverse point) 

2 4 6 8 r •0"•, 12 

2.• 2.1 

146 

22 6 |17.7 

34 2 125.0 

65 8 •65.6 77 4 4.4 

85 4 ]75.0 

91 8/ 82.3 

97 / 88.2 

_/ 93.3 

97.9 

RECTANGULAR DUCTS 

MEASUREMENTS 

Distai•ce Distance 

Traverse % of from inside from outside 

Point Diameter wail of port 

lO. 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

9 

10 

1I 

2 3 • 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12__ 

25.0 16.7 12.5 10.0 8.3 7.1 6.3 5.6 5.0 4.5 4.2 

75.0 50.0 37.5 30.0 25.0 21.4 18.8 16.7 15.0 •3.6 12.5 

63.3 62.5 50.0 41.7 35.7 31.3 27.8 25.0 22.7 20.8 

87.5 70.0 58.3 50.0 43.8 38.9 35.0 31,8 29,2 

90.0 75.0 64.3 56.3 50.0 45,0 40.9 37.5 

91.7 78.6 68.8 61.1 55.0 50.0 45.8 

92.9 81.3 72.2 65.0 59.1 54.2 

93.8 83.3 75.0 68.2 62.5 

94.4 85.0 77,3 70.8 

95.0 86.4 79.2 

95.5 87.5 

95.8 

ALLEY & ASSOCIATES 
SOURCE 

SKETCH 

QA 60 Vs As 

Qs = QA (1-BWS 528 x 

Ts 29.92 

Ps 

TPJS, VERSE PT 

AVERAGE 0.•:• / 

MOISTURE 

Vs 

0 s 

tVlettno.• 2 E. F•.ob•.::r•/•llr-: Associates, tnc. 
..,•.--,•.'.£s-'•£-L•:.s•/z_•x•-.•,•L•/•- PROJECT •('• •'" 

SOURCE R,'i• fs• • .• .• 

STACK DIrd•ENS•ON '•&• " 

CR.OSS SECTIONAL AREA 

PFFOT' TUBE iD# •-0!• AVG COEFFICIENT •• 

SKETCH 

Vs 85.4.9 Cp •tAP ave -J Ts 

QA 60 Vs As 

IVt•w Ps 

Os Q,• (1-BWS) 52_ 8_ x ps 

Ts 29.92 

TRAVERSE PT 

q 

"7 

"•/AP AVERAGE 

AP AVERAGE 

Ts AVERAGE 

MOISTURE 

Vs 

Method 2 E. Roberts Alley & Assoc ares, Inc. 
1ViETHOD 4 lV[OI[STURE CALCULATIONS 

SOURCE 

• (v, YAVG DATE •//7•.5 

START TIME 

-END TIME 

SAMPLE TIME 

METER VOLUME 

TOTAL METER VOLUME, Vm 

METER TEMP, F, IN/OUT 

AVERAGE METER TEMP, F, Tm 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, Pb 

METER PRESSURE, DH, in H20 

CORRECTED VOLUME, Vm(std) 

IMP 1, mL, PRE/POST •8o / •1• 

IMP 2, mL, PREIPOST coo / 10 o 

IMP 3, mL, PREIPOST 0 1 

IMP 4, g, PRE/POST <SE;G.,• / •,'U:• ,0 

V•:-•L-LD]IE-MO•ST-•RE,'--•-Vw(std '''`e,:':--::--) i-- .• \v.• I! [. iqe.i O. •--'5•0 

I',IOTES• Vm(std) (17.64 X Vm X mofX (Pb + DH/13,6) 

Ta or Tm+ 460 

Vw(std) Vie X C ilL, C=l 333 

if of, C=0.04707 

Bw$ Vw(std) 

Vm(std) + Vw(std) 

Moisture Percent 

Where: Vm(std)= 

Vm 

mcf 

Pb 

DH 

Ta= 

"fm 

Vw(std) 

VIc 

Bws 

Bws X 100 

Sample volume corrected to standard romp and pressure, sofor L 

Actual sample volume, calculated, sof or L 

Meter correction factor 

Barometric pressure, in. blg 

Meter pressure, in H20 

Ambient temperature, Deg F (Rotometer is used) 

Temperature of meter (DMG is used) 

Volume of water vapor at standard conditions, scf or L 

Volume of water condensed, mL 

Mole fraction of water vapor 
METHOD 4 MOISTURE CALCULATIONS 

SOURCE ?•' A-,. O•Z PERSONNEL 

DATE .•')/7/•.5- METERID /-•-TG• .YAvo 

RUN# 

START TIME F5 • 

END TIME q • 

SAMPLE TIME 

=-Z ••• 

¢30 

"•ETER VOLUI•IE PRE/POST 

TOTAL METER VOLUME, Vm 

METER TEMP, F, IN/OUT 

AVERAGE METER TEMP, F, Tm 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, Pb 

i 

METER PRESSURE, DH, in H20 

CORRECTED VOLUME, Vm(std) 

IMP 1, mL, PRE/POST 

IMP 2, mL, PRE/POST 

IMP 3, mL, PRE/POST 

IMP 4, g, PRE/POST 

VOLUME WATER, Vlc (mL) 

VOLUME MOISTURE, Vw(std) 

gws 

io':::' / 11"7 

/ / 

/ / 

MOISTURE PERCENT 

NOTES: Vm(std) [17.64 X Vm X mcfX (Pb + OH/13 

Ta or Tm+ 460 

Vw(std) VIc X C if L, C=1.333 

if of, C=0.04707 

Bws Vw(std• 

Vm(std) Vw(std) 

Moisture Percent Bws X 100 

Where: Vm(std)= 

Vm 

mcf= 

pb 

DH 

Ta 

Tm 

Vw(std) 

VIc 

Sample volume corrected to standard temp and pressure, scf or L 

Actual sample volume, calculated, scfor L 

Meter correction factor 

Barometric pressure, in. Hg 

Meter pressure, in H20 

Ambient temperature, Deg F (Rotometer is used) 

Temperature of meter (DMG is used) 

Volume of water vapor at standard conditions, scf or L 

Volume of water condensed, mL 

Bws Mole fraction of water vapor 

Moisture Calculations E. Roberts Alley & Associates 

Model #: C5000 

Serial #: 1376 

APEX INBTRUI,•NTS 

EPA Method 

522 Series Calibration 

Pro-Test Orifice Method 

English Units, English Pactor 

Filename: C:\Doettments and S•ttings\stacyc\My Documents\Company Files\Stack Test T•mplateskMethod Templet 

Revised• 7/25/95 Version: 2,2 

*12/22/04 

Barometric 29.97 (in. 

Theoretical Critical 14.14 (in. 

valid test results, the Actual should ba 1 in. Hg greater than the Theoretical Critical sho•n above. 

The Critical Orifice Coefficient, K', be entered in English units, (ft)•3*(deg R)•0-5/((in-Hg )w(min))' 

GAS •ETER READINGS -CRITICAL ORIFICE READINGS- 

(in H20) 

1.90 

3.56 

5.50 

Time Initisl Final Total Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Serial# Coefficient Initial Final Averase 

(min) (cuft) (cuft) (cuft) (dog F) (dog F) (dog F) (dog F) (number) (see above) (in Rg) (dog F) (dog F) (dog F) 

15.00 316.400 322.725 6.325 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 DO48 0.331 22.5 68,0 68.0 68.0 

10.00 322.725 328.377 5.652 58.0 58.0 60.0 60.0 D055 0.438 21.0 68.0 68.0 68.0 

10.00 328,377 335.436 7.059 60.0 60.0 61.0 57.0 D663 0.562 19.5 68.0 68.0 68.0 

5.00 335.436 340.331 4.895 61.0 59.0 65.0 60.0 DG73 0.780 17.0 68.0 68.0 68.0 

5.00 340.331 346,321 5.990 65,0 60.0 68.0 61.0 DOS1 0.959 15.0 68.0 68.0 

ORIFICE DRY GAS METER ORIFICE 

VOLUME VOLLq4E VOLUME VOLU}• CALIBRATION FACTOR 

CORRECTED CORRECTED CORE CORE NOMINAL 

Vm(shd) Vm(std) Vcz(std) Vcr(std) 'Value Variation 

(c• ft) (liters) (cuft) (liters) (cuft) (number) (number) 

6.465 183,1 6.476 183.4 6.468 1.002 -0.007 

5.773 163.5 5.708 161,6 5•700 0,989 -0.020 

7,217 204.4 7.330 207.6 7.321 1.016 0.007 

5,008 141.8 5,084 144.0 5.078 3.015 0.007 

6.131 173.6 6.257 177.2 6.249 1.021 0.012 

C_•IERATION FACTOR 

V•lue Value a•iation 

(in H20) (ms E20) (in E20) 

1.895 48.13 -0.073 

1.936 49.16 -0.032 

2,029 51.53 0,061 

1,972 50.00 0,004 

2,008 50.99 0,040 

Average 1.008 1,968 49.98 Average 

Calibration Y, the ratio of the reading of the calibration the dry meter, 

acceptable tolerance individual values the average is 

Orifice Calibration Factor dH@, the orifice differential pressure in inches of that equates 0.75 cfm of air 

at and 29,92 inches of Hg, acceptable toleran,/•' of imdlvidual values the average is +-0.2. 
Certificate of A . a ysis EPA 

Cylinder No: SG9136100 

Cylinder Pressure: 2,013 psig 

Certification Date: 01/16/2004 

5480 Hamilton Bird, 

Theodore, AL 36582 

(251) 653-2500 Fax: (251) 653-2530 

www,•.irgas.com 

Protocol Gas Mixture 

Reference Number: 47-76361900-004 

Expiration Date: 0111612007 

Laboratory: ASG Mobile 

•}fi•a[ion•erformed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol (Sept. 1997) using the assay procedures hsted. 

Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interferences. 

•^• #47-040105/0065 Notes: AIRGAS PC 11u•,•3045 A,R,-,,-,,• LOT 

Do not use cylinder below t50 psig. 

Reference Standard •r•formation 

GMIS 0 

Ar•a•ytical Results 

1st Component 

1st Analysis Date: 

R 1,026 S 

S 923.0 Z 

Z 0.0000 R 

2rid Analysis Date: 

R 1,026 S 

S 923.0 Z 

Z 0.0000 R 

Approved for Release 

01/09/2004 

923.0 Z 0.0000 Conc 923.0PPM 

0.0000 R 1,020 Conc 923.0PPM 

1,026 S 923.0 Conc 923.0PPM 

AVG: 923.0 PPM 

01/16/20O4 

923.0 Z 0.0000 Conc 923.0PPM 

0.0000 R f,026 Conc 923.0PPM 

1,026 S 923.0 Conc 923.0PPM 

AVG: 923.0 PPM 

Component_ CvL Number Concentratio• 

Sulfur Dioxide ND-15687 1,026 PPM 
Airgas Specialty Gases 

Certificate of Anaf sis: 

Cylinder Number: CC162300 

Cylinder Pressure: 1999.6 PSIG 

Certification Date: 0/26/2004 

Certified Concentrations 

EPA Rroto¢o Gas [Viix.tu . e 

Reference Number: 

Expiration Date: 

Laboratory: 

47-124024889-5 

10/26/2007 

ASG Mobile AL 

5480 Hamilton Boulevard 

Theodore, AL 36582 

251.653.2500 Fax: 251.653.2530 

w¢c,,•.airgas.com 

Procedure 

Component 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

OXYGEN 

NITROGEN 

Concentration Accuracy Analytical Principle 

19.87 % +/- 1% NDIR 

20.06 % +/- 1% PARAMAGN G1 

Balance 

Certification performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol (Sept. 1997)" using the assay procedures listed. 

Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interferences. 

Notes:Airgas PO 110747905 •• 

Do not use cylinder below 150 psig. App,oval Signature •-•-" •£!' 

Reference Standard •nforrnation 

NTRIvl 82659 

NTRM 82745 

Anaiytical Results 

st Component 

st Analysis Date: 

19.38 S 19.88 

19.88 Z 0.000 

0.000 R 19,38 

Balance s Comuone_nt CVI Numbe.r .Concentration_ 

NITROGEN OXYGEN SG9163000 20.98 % 

NITROGEN CARBON DIOXIDE SG9198981- 19.37 % 

10/26/2004 

Z 0.000 ConG 19.87 % 

R 19.38 Conc 19.87 % 

S 19.88 Conc 19,87 % 

AVG: 19,87 % 

2rid Cow.portent 

1st Analysis Date: 

R 20.98 S 20.06 

S 20.06 Z 0.000 

Z 0.000 R 20.98 

.QXY'GE 

10/26/2004 

Z 0.000 Conc 20.06 % 

R 20.98 Conc 20.06 % 

S 20.06 Conc 20.06 % 

AVG: 20,06 % 
SULFUR D•OX•]DE EFA METHOD 6C 

]INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS CAL][BRATIGN DATA 

Plant 

Date 

Location 

Operator 

Concentration Range Response Time 

Calibration Accuracy (Accuracy • 2% of span value) __ppm 

Gas Cylinder Actual Analyzer 

Type No. Concentration 

ZERO 

HIGH 

Gas 

MID 

Cylinder Actual Analyzer 

No. • 

ZERO & SPAN SYSTEM BIAS 

GAS •ITI• F•AL 

TYPE •SPONSE •SPONSE 

(Accuracy _+ 5% of span) ppm 

(Drift + 3% of span) ppm 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

9 "° 
[NSTRU•{%ENTAL ANALYSIS CALIBRATION •ATA 

Concentration Range_ 

Calibration Accuracy (Accuracy 

Location. 

Operator :•gdt 

Response Time 

+ 2% of span) 

cl 

]22. •'} 

Gas 

Type 

ZERO 

HIGH 

Cylinder 

No. 

Actual 

Concentration 

Analyzer Gas 

Type 

0. O MID 

Cylinder 

No. 

,••I 

Actual 

Concentration 

Analyzer 

ZERO & SPAN SYSTEM BIAS 

fviE O, 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE •SPONSE EESPONSE 

zsao O, O 

•.o 

(Accuracy +_ 5% of span) 

(Drift +_ 3% of span) 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYpE •SeONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO O, 0 O, 0 

@" 0 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE P,_ESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZSaO O, O 4, • 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZEr,.O 0.0 O, 0 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO 
OXY©R',N -EYA •,•TfIO•D ZA 

INSTRUL•ENTAL •NALYSiS CALIBI•.T:EON DATA 

Response Time O. :)5 

2% of span ) % 

Concentration Range •d 

Cs_libration Acctu-acy: (Accuracy 

@':5 

Gas Cylinder Actual /,ma[yzer 

Type No. Concentration 

zmo •% O, O O, 0 

HIGH 

Oas Cylinder 

Type No. 

Actual 

Concentration 

_Analyzer 

ZERO & SPAN SYSTEM BIAS 

¢ 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE •SPO•SE •SPOHS• 

z•ao 0• O O, 0 

•;• tO.O •o,o 

(Accuracy _+ 5% of span) __% 

(Drift +_ 3% of span) % 

":,: .,'' "" ..} }"," ....... ::"N2"I..•I•:!• -•'•'' •'•"•"e•ii '! 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE PJESPONSE PdgSPONSE 

ZERO C) ,0 O. O 

':" 't,•;•:- •.:'. 

.... ,,, :::.• ,.,' ,:-• i,:,: '< ',:: i.:•'. ••.•: :;:. :•,::...•.:,, 

:.!•;'i•;•!.:.; ::::, !:-.-.. '::v#, •,::,! 'i•!•!•',••i,•.,:,..;,.:,..i•,,:.•.•,::,,:•-.: .:•. 

GAS INITIAL F•'gAL 

TYPE P,_ESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO 

GAS INITIAL 

TYPE P,_ESPONSE 

ZERO O.O 

/0.0 

FINAL 

.RESPONSE 

/o, 0 

GAS 

TYPE. 

ZERO 

•NITiAL 

RESPONSE 

0.© 

FIN•,I, 

RESPONSE 

GAS •!TIAL 

Tk-PE P,:ESPONSE P,.ESPON SE 

ZERO 
PITOT TUBE CAL•.BR&T•ON 

v LEI}•%? yes no 

pZ[OOT •E •,•mmE•L_ // " 

yes / no 

2.0 

>0 750 

>2.0 

>3.0 
Sample .Probe 

Inspected By: •-•-• 

inspection Date: •_ 

Probe ID: • 

Pitot Tube Openiffgs Damaged? 

Pitot Tube Aligmn.ent OK? 

Calibration Required? 

External Tube Diameter (Dt)* 

*Dt must be between 3/16 abd 3/8 

Base-to-plane opening distances (Pa and Pb)* 

*Pa Pb 

Vesl K 

 'est_ "/. 

Dt 0.375 

Pa 0.4375 

Pb 0.4375 

Pa/Dt 1.17 

(Must be between 1.05 and 1.5) 

Ifpitot does not meet the criteria specified above it must be repaired or calibrated in 

accordance with Sections 4,1.2 through 4.15 of Method 2. 

Baseline coefficient of 0.84 applied to pitots that meet inspection criteria. 

2•Z :Z::, ::';:.Z:./2}:::::i':/2:!:!i:;::,i:•:"i{•••'.i••':. 4: 12 :/:i: 2Z:::'..I :. 

Target 

Temp. 

Ice-32F 

Ambient-70F 

Hot Oi]-150F 

Boiling H20-212F 

Hot Oil- 150F 

Reference 

Temp. 

.•ndicated 

Temp. 

Temp. 

Difference Difference Specification 

% Difference < 1.5 

Comments: 

Assoe a,$es 
0 

0 

0 

II