alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 04- 16 -00786

IN THE
FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

ANTHONY MOORE AND JOANN MOORE, Appellant

v.

DAVID SUBIA, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law, Bexar County, Texas

APPELLEE’S OPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE HIS BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS:

APPELLEE

, DAVID SUBIA (“ Appell ee ”) , respectfully present his Motion

for Extension of Time to file His Brief, and would respectfully show the Court as

follows:

I.

On August 21, 2017, Appellants filed their Amended Brief. Appellee ’ s

Brief was due on September 20, 2017. Appell ee s request an extension of time to

file their brief for the following reasons: ACCEPTED
04-16-00786-CV
FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
9/25/2017 2:27 PM2

 The undersigned attended numerous hearings during the week of August 21

,

2017 to August 25, 2017 in child custody and real estate matters ;

 The undersigned participated in a two

- day mediation on August 30, 2017

and September 1, 2017;

 The undersigned worked on a petition for review to the Texas Supreme

Court during the week of September 5, 2017 to September 8, 2017 ;

 The undersigned’s office was closed for Labor Day on September 4, 2017;

and

 The length of Appellants’ Brief requires additional time to respond.

II

.

Appellee ask s this Court to extend the time to file their Brief f or thirty days

up to and including October 20 , 2017

. Appellant s have been granted numerous

extensions of time in the past.

III

.

This motion is not brought for purposes of delay but so lely that justice may

be served.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, APPELLEE prays that he be

given an additional thirty (30) days to respond to Appellants’ Brief

. Appellee

pray s for such other relief to which he may be entitled consis tent with this Court’s

ruling

.3 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Christopher J. Deeves
CHRISTOPHER J. DEEVES

State Bar No. 00790575

THE LAW OFFICE OF

C HRISTOPHER DEEVES, P.C. 1370 Pantheon Way, Suite 110 San Antonio, Texas 78232 (210) 445

- 8807 (210) 501

- 0915 (fax)

e

- mail: chrisdeeves@att.net

ATTORNEY FOR

APPELL EE

DAVID SUBIA

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

On September 2 0 , 2017, Appellee’s counsel called pro se Appellant, Anthony Moore, who refused to discuss this matter without a submission in

wr iting. A proposed motion was sent to him. Pro se Appellant then filed an opposition to this motion without ever receiving the proposed motion or discussing

it. This motion is therefore oppose d

.

/ s/ Christopher J. Deeves
CHRISTOPHER J. DEEVES4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This will certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document was served as indicated to the following counsel of record listed below

on September 25

, 2017 :

Via Priority Mail Anthony Moore

Joann Moore

P.O. Box 3400 96 San Antonio, Texas 78234
/ s/ Christopher J. Deeves
CHRISTOPHER J. DEEVES
#### John McClave *v.*John R. Miller, Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Jefferson County.

Mandamus.

J. *F. Dayton,*for plaintiff.

By the Court.

The application for a writ of mandamus to compel the defendant to make an allowance to the plaintiff for services rendered, is based on the same state of facts as is set forth in the above case of *Anderson*v. *The Commissioners,*and for like reasons the writ must be refused.
Editorial Note on Part 386
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 386 appear at 65 FR 7755, Feb. 16, 2000, and 88 FR 80182, Nov. 17, 2023.

§ 386.37 Discovery. ( a ) Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: Depositions upon oral examination or written questions; written interrogatories; request for production of documents or other evidence for inspection and other purposes; physical and mental examinations; and requests for admission.
( b ) Discovery may not commence until the matter is pending before the Agency Decisionmaker or referred to the Office of Hearings.
( c ) Except as otherwise provided in these rules, in the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 551 *et seq.,* or by the Agency Decisionmaker or Administrative Law Judge, in the absence of specific Agency provisions or regulations, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may serve as guidance in administrative adjudications.
[70 FR 28483, May 18, 2005]
Editorial Note on Part 386
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 386 appear at 65 FR 7755, Feb. 16, 2000, and 88 FR 80182, Nov. 17, 2023.

§ 386.41 Stipulations regarding discovery. Unless otherwise ordered, a written stipulation entered into by all the parties and filed with the Agency Decisionmaker or the administrative law judge, if one has been appointed, may: ( a ) Provide that depositions be taken before any person, at any time or place, upon sufficient notice, and in any manner, and when so taken may be used like other depositions, and
( b ) Modify the procedures provided by these rules for other methods of discovery.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.82

December 1, 2003

KRDS, Inc.
6 CHATTANOOGA
IRVINE, CA 92620

RE:      17861 CARTWRIGHT ROAD LEASE
         RIGHT OF CANCELLATION -- LETTER DATED APRIL 11, 2002

Gentlemen:

We held recent discussion regarding rescission of the above cancellation
agreement from our existing lease.

In exchange for eliminating the remaining late charges of $7,125.80, we are
willing to rescind the right of cancellation, effective immediately. If this is
agreeable to you, please sign below and return a copy to me for our files.

I will arrange to have paid to you the remaining back rents, together with the
current month's rent.

Landlord:                                    Tenant:

/s/ Dilip R. Shah                            /s/ Thomas E. Schiff
---------------------------------            -----------------------------------
KRDS, Inc.                                   SSP Solutions, Inc.
Dilip Shah                                   Thomas E. Shiff
Managing Partner                             Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Alfacell Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Savadelis,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: June 14, 2004


                                        /s/ Andrew P. Savadelis
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Name: Andrew P. Savadelis
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                               (Principal Financial Officer and
                                               Chief Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Alfacell Corporation and will be retained by Alfacell Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                     - 33 -
Editorial Note on Part 393
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 393.114 What are the requirements for front end structures used as part of a cargo securement system? ( a ) *Applicability.* The rules in this section are applicable to commercial motor vehicles transporting articles of cargo that are in contact with the front end structure of the vehicle. The front end structure on these cargo-carrying vehicles must meet the performance requirements of this section.
( b ) *Height and width.* ( 1 ) The front end structure must extend either to a height of 4 feet above the floor of the vehicle or to a height at which it blocks forward movement of any item or article of cargo being carried on the vehicle, whichever is lower.
( 2 ) The front end structure must have a width which is at least equal to the width of the vehicle or which blocks forward movement of any article of cargo being transported on the vehicle, whichever is narrower.
( c ) *Strength.* The front end structure must be capable of withstanding the following horizontal forward static load: ( 1 ) For a front end structure less than 6 feet in height, a horizontal forward static load equal to one-half (0.5) of the weight of the articles of cargo being transported on the vehicle uniformly distributed over the entire portion of the front end structure that is within 4 feet above the vehicle's floor or that is at or below a height above the vehicle's floor at which it blocks forward movement of any article of the vehicle's cargo, whichever is less; or
( 2 ) For a front end structure 6 feet in height or higher, a horizontal forward static load equal to four-tenths (0.4) of the weight of the articles of cargo being transported on the vehicle uniformly distributed over the entire front end structure.
( d ) *Penetration resistance.* The front end structure must be designed, constructed, and maintained so that it is capable of resisting penetration by any article of cargo that contacts it when the vehicle decelerates at a rate of 20 feet per second, per second. The front end structure must have no aperture large enough to permit any article of cargo in contact with the structure to pass through it.
( e ) *Substitute devices.* The requirements of this section may be met by the use of devices performing the same functions as a front end structure, if the devices are at least as strong as, and provide protection against shifting articles of cargo at least equal to, a front end structure which conforms to those requirements.
[67 FR 61225, Sept. 27, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 35833, June 22, 2006]
Office of  Recpelatime + Sreynetectiine June 16, 2015
Employee Benefits Security Administration

US Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, NW #4804 /v ~51 uss

Washington, DC 20210

Dear Sir or Madam:
1AM AGAINST the “Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice.”

The proposal would add unnecessary and excessive burdens on advisors and would
result in unintended consequences. Remember when the president said you could
keep your insurance and keep your doctor under the Affordable Care Act? But
then thousands of people lost their insurance and doctors. That is going to happen
with this proposal. Smaller investors will probably lose their current adviser, and
smaller investors who are newly retiring will have major difficulty finding an
investment advisor to work with them.

In addition, this proposal will probably significantly increase the costs for current
advisors to continue their business because of the additional burdens and
requirements they would now have to comply with. Some advisors may just
decide to close their doors. These advisors are already regulated by federal and
state bodies.

Sincerely,
ie one Sardere
(Gf Derenl Das
Lake lard 3350)

CC: Senator Marco Rubio, 284 Russell Senate Office Building, Wash., DE
20510; Senator Bill Nelson, US Senate, 716 Senate Hart Office Building, Wash.,
DC 20510; President Obama, The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW,
Wash, DC 20500; Congressman Dennis Ross, 229 Cannon HOB, Wash., Dée
20515 5 : : :
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1136.html[7/22/2015 2:29:59 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-vero

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1136

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: lynn hillman

Address:

1111 Haven Hollow Way

Durham, 27713

Email: nnyl@outlook.com

Phone: 9197970443

General Comment

No added regulations for my IRA, please!

Lynn Hillman
Exhibit 31.3


CERTIFICATIONS








I, Steven R. Staub, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of FirstEnergy Ohio PIRB Special Purpose Trust 2013 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by The Toledo Edison Company, as servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, The Toledo Edison Company, as servicer, has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.








In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank, National Association, as Certificate Trustee and Indenture Trustee.








Date: March 29, 2024





/s/ Steven R. StaubSteven R. StaubVice President and Treasurer (Senior Officer in Charge of Servicing Function) of The Toledo Edison Company, as Servicer under the Phase-In-Recovery Property Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2013, between the Servicer and TE Funding LLC, as the Bond Issuer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2559
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               4700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    4611
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       13,181
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         13,176
<LOANS>                                      38,148
<ALLOWANCE>                                     512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               66,147
<DEPOSITS>                                   56,749
<SHORT-TERM>                                      0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             738
<LONG-TERM>                                    2949
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                    3588
<COMMON>                                       1067
<OTHER-SE>                                     1056
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               66,147
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 910
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               262
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 52
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               1224
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              442
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              504
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           720
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 551
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 239
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      239
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    158
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  4.7
<LOANS-NON>                                     145
<LOANS-PAST>                                    151
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 145
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                506
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     0
<RECOVERIES>                                      6
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               512
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            512
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1   CHIRON
CORPORATION   SECTION 1350
CERTIFICATION  In connection with the periodic report of CHIRON CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation(the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, HOWARD H. PIEN, Chief Executive Officerof the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) 
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  (2) 
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.  This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.   Date: November 12, 2003
  By:
  /s/  Howard
  H. PienHOWARD
  H. PIENPresident and
  Chief Executive Officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsProject ExodusA design for a manned Mars mission, PROJECT EXODUS is presented. PROJECT EXODUS incorporates the design of a hypersonic waverider, cargo ship and NIMF (nuclear rocket using indigenous Martian fuel) shuttle lander to safely carry out a three to five month mission on the surface of Mars. The cargo ship transports return fuel, return engine, surface life support, NIMF shuttle, and the Mars base to low Mars orbit (LMO). The cargo ship is powered by a nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) system which allows the cargo ship to execute a spiral trajectory to Mars. The waverider transports ten astronauts to Mars and back. It is launched from the Space Station with propulsion provided by a chemical engine and a delta velocity of 9 km/sec. The waverider performs an aero-gravity assist maneuver through the atmosphere of Venus to obtain a deflection angle and increase in delta velocity. Once the waverider and cargo ship have docked the astronauts will detach the landing cargo capsules and nuclear electric power plant and remotely pilot them to the surface. They will then descend to the surface aboard the NIMF shuttle. A dome base will be quickly constructed on the surface and the astronauts will conduct an exploratory mission for three to five months. They will return to Earth and dock with the Space Station using the waverider.Document ID19900016710Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBryant, Rodney*(Maryland Univ. College Park, MD, United States)*Dillon, Jennifer*(Maryland Univ. College Park, MD, United States)*Grewe, George*(Maryland Univ. College Park, MD, United States)*Mcmorrow, Jim*(Maryland Univ. College Park, MD, United States)*Melton, Craig*(Maryland Univ. College Park, MD, United States)*Rainey, Gerald*(Maryland Univ. College Park, MD, United States)*Rinko, John*(Maryland Univ. College Park, MD, United States)*Singh, David*(Maryland Univ. College Park, MD, United States)*Yen, Tzu-Liang*(Maryland Univ. College Park, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1990Subject CategoryAstronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberENAE-412NAS 1.26:186836NASA-CR-186836UM-AERO-90-28Accession Number90N26026Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NGT-21-002-800Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016710.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Thomas McNamara, Respondent, v. The Delaware, Lackawana and Western Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Merwin, J.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Latin Americaand the Caribbean [electronic resource] : selected economic and social data.**** 
SuDocNumber:ID1.22:
ItemNumber:0900-I-13(online)
CGPsystem Number:000627513
 
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001-02
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
 **