alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                     Exhibit 23.1
                                                     ------------
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
=================================================================



The Board of Directors
CMI Corporation:


We  consent  to  incorporation by reference in  the  registration
statement  on Form S-8 (No. 33-66274) of CMI Corporation  of  our
report  dated  February 12, 1996, relating  to  the  consolidated
balance sheets of CMI Corporation and subsidiaries as of December
31,  1995  and  1994, and the related consolidated statements  of
operations, changes in common stock and other capital,  and  cash
flows  and  related schedule for each of the years in the  three-
year period ended December 31, 1995, which report appears in  the
December 31, 1995, annual report on Form 10-K of CMI Corporation.



                                            KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
March 4, 1996
Exhibit 32-7



Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code



The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Report on Form 10-K of PECO Energy Company for the year ended December 31,
2006, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of PECO Energy Company.



|                        |  |                       
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Date: February 13, 2007 |  | /s/    JOHN L.
SKOLDS 
|                        |  | John L. Skolds        
|                        |  | President             
|                        |  | Exelon Energy Delivery



415
#### Bartolo Famularo, Respondent, *v.*Oil Well Supply Company, Appellant.

*Famularo*v. *Oil Well Supply Co.,*128 App. Div. 907, affirmed.

(Argued November 30, 1910;

decided December 16, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 12, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the defendant’s negligence.

*H. L. Howe*for appellant.

*Francis D. Culkin*and *D. P. Morehouse*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
§ 270.405 General requirements; procedure. ( a ) Each railroad subject to this part shall: ( 1 ) Establish and implement an FRMP as part of its SSP; and
( 2 ) Establish an FRA-approved FRMP plan as a component of a railroad's FRA-approved SSP plan and then update its FRMP plan as necessary as part of the annual internal assessment of its SSP under § 270.303.
( b ) A railroad's FRMP plan must explain the railroad's method of analysis of fatigue risks and the railroad's process(es) for implementing its FRMP.
( c ) ( 1 ) A railroad shall submit an FRMP plan to FRA for approval no later than either the applicable timeline in § 270.201(a) for filing its SSP plan or July 13, 2023, whichever is later.
( 2 ) A railroad shall submit updates to its FRMP plan under the process for amending its SSP plan in § 270.201(c).
( d ) FRA shall review and approve or disapprove a railroad's FRMP plan and amendments to that plan under the process for reviewing SSP plans and amendments in § 270.201(b) and (c), respectively. FRA approval of a railroad's FRMP plan amends a railroad's SSP plan to include the FRMP plan as a component.
H. Res. 180

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 27, 2001.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the Bill (H.R. 2311) making appropriations for energy and

water development for the fiscal year ending September 30,

2002, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill

shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. The amendment printed in the report of the Committee

on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as

adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole.

Points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, for

failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived except
2

•HRES 180 EH

section 308. During consideration of the bill for further

amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole

may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the

Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed

in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for

that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and

report the bill, as amended, to the House with such further

amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jym-zpng

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2208

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Barbara Serbick

General Comment

I'm smart enough to plan for my own retirement - leave my IRA alone!
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>      5 
<LEGEND>   THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACT
           FROM THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE      
           STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
           REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                 <C>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1998            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1998            SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                  4,520                  5,084
<SECURITIES>                           10,191                  5,225
<RECEIVABLES>                           6,450                  7,488
<ALLOWANCES>                              138                    114
<INVENTORY>                             4,844                  4,687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       27,453                 23,381
<PP&E>                                  6,304                  5,556
<DEPRECIATION>                          3,592                  2,660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         30,165                 26,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   5,665                  5,103
<BONDS>                                     0                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0                      0
<PREFERRED>                                 0                      0
<COMMON>                                   10                     10
<OTHER-SE>                             24,490                 21,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           30,165                 26,277
<SALES>                                32,618                 33,178
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       32,618                 33,178
<CGS>                                  16,421                 15,984
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          16,421                 15,984
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       11,051                 10,382
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         5,737                  7,188
<INCOME-TAX>                            2,180                  2,731
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     3,557                  4,457
<DISCONTINUED>                              0                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0                      0
<CHANGES>                                   0                      0
<NET-INCOME>                            3,557                  4,457
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           $0.37                  $0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                           $0.36                  $0.45
         

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CHIRON CORPORATION'S
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATED MARCH 31, 2000 AND UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         380,326
<SECURITIES>                                 1,035,288<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  235,602<F5>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,569
<INVENTORY>                                     92,368
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,483,850
<PP&E>                                         528,856
<DEPRECIATION>                                 229,947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,404,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          563,120
<BONDS>                                         93,062<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,819
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,692,885<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,404,039
<SALES>                                        157,606
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               216,745
<CGS>                                           51,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                75,441<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,019
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,026
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,161
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,077
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             40,084
<DISCONTINUED>                                     152
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    40,236
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
<FN>
<F1>CONSISTS OF SHORT-TERM AND NONCURRENT INVESTMENTS IN MARKETABLE DEBT AND
EQUITY SECURITIES.
<F2>CONSISTS OF CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES AND NOTES PAYABLE, NET OF
CURRENT MATURITIES.
<F3>CONSISTS OF ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL, ACCUMULATED DEFICIT, COST OF
TREASURY STOCK AND ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME.
<F4>CONSISTS OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, RESTRUCTURING AND REORGANIZATION
CHARGES AND OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES.
<F5>CONSISTS OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND CURRENT AND NONCURRENT PORTIONS OF NOTES
RECEIVABLE.
</FN>


</TABLE>
From: Mark Baldassarre [mailto:m_baldassarre@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 12:58 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Dear DOL,

You guys are completely out of control! You are trying to change an industry which has provided investors with the 

safest products and best advice from the very best advisors the financial industry has to offer.

Agents who provide annuities already have a fiduciary responsibility, it is inherent, that's why we give the advice we 

give. 

We are not the ones losing clients half of their life savings, we are the ones protecting consumers and making them 

money to boot!

Existing regulation is already is burdensome to the advisor and client. Investors know their options, educated ones 

choose FIAs because they know they can get returns along with safety. They get that education from their agent. The 

client gets a thorough explanation along with a CONRACT. That contract can be returned if the client is in any way 

dissatisfied. 

Your proposal tries to vilify the agent. The agent is the one protecting the investor from a corrupt and volatile stock 

market! Without the agent looking out for the client, the client [investor] has no council. Although agents are deemed 

to be "working" for the insurance company, we are also working for the client. As independent agents we are seeking 

the best products for our clients. My clients already know I make a commission. NONE of them care because they 

know our 3 way relationship is symbiotic. We all win. None of my clients EVER LOSE and that's due to the benefit 

they get from a competent, compensated advisor matching their needs with a quality insurance company.

In 30 years of practice, I have yet to have even ONE complaint from a client. The system works as it is so you can 

leave us all alone!

Every state already regulates the crap out of this industry, we don't need any more regulation.

Maybe you haven't noticed the fact that investors like the way we do business. If you need evidence of that just look 

at FIA sales! People aren't stupid. Overregulation is stupid. All your legislation is going to do is make it harder for hard 

working people to get good advice and good financial products. As it stands, clients DO NOT PAY for this advice or 

any fees for the product [unless it has riders] yet you are "concerned" that the agent is compensated for protecting 

investors? 

Get a real job and leave us agents and investors who have JOBS alone!

 Mark Baldassarre

Financial Planner

LIMRA International Panel Member

3 Park Dr. E. Ottsville PA,18942

610-847-2862
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1055.html[7/22/2015 7:10:05 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-mt4q

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1055

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Richard Wheeler

General Comment

First and foremost the government has shown itself completely inept in managing its own affairs much less than

 trying to manage every American citizen affairs.

So please keep your corrupt hands off of my earnings and retirement.

Thank You very much

And have a very nice day.
1 The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1496

___________ Derek L. Givens, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Cingular Wireless, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: February 4, 2005 Filed: February 7, 2005

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Derek L. Givens appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman , 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review), we affirm. As to Givens’s hostile-work-environment claim, we agree with the district court Givens did not show that he was subjected to conduct extreme enough to-2- change the terms and conditions of his employment, see Burkett v. Glickman , 327 F.3d 658, 662 (8th Cir. 2003), or that the conduct was due to his race or gender. As to Givens’s retaliation claim, we also agree that placing Givens on a “performance improvement plan,” without more, did not constitute an adverse employment action, see Henthorn v. Capitol Communications, Inc. , 359 F.3d 1021, 1028 (8th Cir. 2004) (negative employment review is actionable only if it is later used as basis to alter in detrimental way terms or conditions of recipient’s employment); and we find no basis in the record for a constructive-discharge claim, see Summit v. S-B Power Tool , 121 F.3d 416, 421 (8th Cir. 1997) (explaining constructive discharge), cert. denied , 523 U.S. 1004 (1998). Finally, Givens’s complaint about his counsel’s representation in the district court is not a basis for reversal. SeeGlick v. Henderson , 855 F.2d 536, 541 (8th Cir. 1988). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Exhibit
10.13

June 15, 2005

John W.
Henry & Company, Inc.
 301 Yamato Road, Suite 2200
 Boca
Raton, Fl. 33431-4931

Attn: Mr. Ken Webster

Re:    Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mr. Webster:

We are writing with respect
to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which
reference is made below (the "Management
Agreements"). We are extending the term of the Management
Agreements through June 30, 2006 and all other provisions of the
Management Agreements will remain
unchanged.

			
		• 	Shearson Mid-West
Futures Fund


			
		• 	Shearson Lehman
Select Advisors Futures Fund
L.P.


			
		• 	Smith Barney Mid-West
Futures Fund L.P. II


			
		• 	Smith
Barney Westport Futures Fund L.P.


			
		• 	Hutton Investors Futures Fund,
L.P. II (HIFF II)


			
		• 	AURORA
2001


			
		• 	AURORA
III


			
		• 	Citigroup Diversified
Futures Fund


			
		• 	Salomon Smith
Barney Diversified 2000 Futures Fund
L.P.


			
		• 	Alera
100


			
		• 	JWH Strategic Allocation
Master Fund LLC









Page 2

June
15, 2005

Please acknowledge receipt of this modification
by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of
Mr. Daniel McAuliffe at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If
you have any questions I can be reached at 212-559-5043.

Very
truly yours,

CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC





							
	By:		/s/
Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.

Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
 Chief
Financial Officer & Director
	JOHN W. HENRY & COMPANY, INC.
	By:		/s/ Ken Webster
	Print Name:   Ken
Webster
	






DRMcA/sr
§ 39.103 What actions do CROs take on complaints? When a complaint is made directly to a CRO (*e.g.,* orally, by phone, TTY) the CRO must promptly take dispositive action as follows: ( a ) If the complaint is made to a CRO before the action or proposed action of PVO personnel has resulted in a violation of a provision of this Part, the CRO must take, or direct other PVO personnel to take, whatever action is necessary to ensure compliance with this Part.
( b ) If an alleged violation of a provision of this Part has already occurred, and the CRO agrees that a violation has occurred, the CRO must provide to the complainant a written statement setting forth a summary of the facts and what steps, if any, the PVO proposes to take in response to the violation.
( c ) If the CRO determines that the PVO's action does not violate a provision of this Part, the CRO must provide to the complainant a written statement including a summary of the facts and the reasons, under this Part, for the determination.
( d ) The statements required to be provided under this section must inform the complainant of his or her right to complain to the Department of Transportation and/or Department of Justice. The CRO must provide the statement in person to the complainant in person if possible; otherwise, it must be transmitted to the complainant within 10 calendar days of the complaint.
§ 390.207 Other governing regulations. ( a ) *Motor carriers.* ( 1 ) A motor carrier granted registration under this part must successfully complete the applicable New Entrant Safety Assurance Program as described in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (a)(1)(iii) of this section as a condition for permanent registration: ( i ) A U.S.- or Canada-domiciled motor carrier is subject to the new entrant safety assurance program under part 385, subpart D, of this subchapter.
( ii ) A Mexico-domiciled motor carrier is subject to the safety monitoring program under part 385, subpart B of this subchapter.
( iii ) A Non-North America-domiciled motor carrier is subject to the safety monitoring program under part 385, subpart I of this subchapter.
( 2 ) Only the legal name or a single trade name of the motor carrier may be used on the Form MCSA-1, the URS online application.
( b ) *Brokers, freight forwarders and non-exempt for-hire motor carriers.* ( 1 ) A broker or freight forwarder must obtain operating authority pursuant to part 365 of this chapter as a condition for obtaining USDOT Registration.
( 2 ) A motor carrier registering to engage in transportation that is not exempt from economic regulation by FMCSA must obtain operating authority pursuant to part 365 of this subchapter as a condition for obtaining USDOT Registration.
( c ) *Intermodal equipment providers.* An intermodal equipment provider is subject to the requirements of subpart C of this part. ( 1 ) Only the legal name or a single trade name of the intermodal equipment provider may be used on the Form MCSA-1, the URS online application.
( 2 ) The intermodal equipment provider must identify each unit of interchanged intermodal equipment by its assigned USDOT Number.
( d ) *Hazardous materials safety permit applicants.* A person who applies for a hazardous materials safety permit is subject to the requirements of part 385, subpart E, of this subchapter.
( e ) *Cargo tank facilities.* A cargo tank facility is subject to the requirements of 49 CFR part 107, subpart F, 49 CFR part 172, subpart H, and 49 CFR part 180.
Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 88 FR 80184, Nov. 17, 2023, § 390.207 was suspended indefinitely, effective Nov. 17, 2023.
§ 375.607 What must I do if I am able to tender a shipment for final delivery more than 24 hours before a specified date? ( a ) You may ask the individual shipper to accept an early delivery date. If the individual shipper does not concur with your request or the individual shipper does not request an early delivery date, you may, at your discretion, place a shipment in storage under your own account and at your own expense in a warehouse located near the destination of the shipment. If you place the shipment in storage, you must comply with paragraph (b) of this section. You may comply with paragraph (c) of this section, at your discretion.
( b ) You must immediately notify the individual shipper of the name and address of the warehouse where you place the shipment. You must make and keep a record of your notification as a part of your shipment records. You have responsibility for the shipment under the terms and conditions of the bill of lading. You are responsible for the charges for redelivery, handling, and storage until you make final delivery.
( c ) You may limit your responsibility under paragraph (b) of this section up to the agreed delivery date or the first day of the period of time of delivery as specified in the bill of lading.