alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION 

I, L. Leon Patterson, certify that:  

1.      I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.;

2.      Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.      The registrant'sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a)    designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)    evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)    disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.      The registrant'sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant'sauditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or personsfulfilling the equivalent functions): 

(a)    all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and 

(b)    any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 9, 2004

/s/      L. Leon Patterson                          L. Leon PattersonChairman and Chief Executive Officer
Docket: IRS-2009-0008 

Request for Information for Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 

2008 

Comment On: IRS-2009-0008-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: IRS-2009-0008-0117 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-09629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Robert Michael Woznicki 

Address: 

port Jefferson, NY, 

Organization: Robert M. Woznicki M.D. PC 

General Comment 

RE: Docket ID IRS-2009-0008 Docket Title Request for Information for Paul 

Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 

2008 Document ID IRS-2009-0008-0001 Document Title Request for Information 

Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Dear Sirs: 

I'm writing is a board certified psychiatrist with over 20 years of experience 

working with all age groups, including the developmentally disabled. There will 

be innumerable other letters addressing the issues of discrimination in 

psychiatric treatment. I'm writing to address a particular area. The realm of 

biofeedback and EEG-biofeedback has suffered its own prejudice, even from mental 

health practitioners, insurers and policy-makers. 

Biofeedback has been an effective clinical tool for decades, and with recent 

improvements in technology has become a treatment choice in some clinical 

circumstances where pharmacologic interventions are too global and surgical 

interventions too invasive. The Department of Defense has recently established 

EEG biofeedback clinics for the treatment of traumatic brain injured veterans. 

Cardiology journals have noted the primal importance of heart rate variability 

in longevity. 

The persistent efforts of mathematicians, engineers, scientists and clinicians 

in facilities as sophisticated as the National Institutes of Health and as

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 29, 2009 

Tracking No. 809bda19 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009
plebian as poorly funded Special Education departments of local school 

districts have developed diagnostic and clinical tools useful in the treatment 

of a variety of mental disorders. The neuroscience supporting EEG-biofeedback 

is robust, clinical findings are compelling. The potential drawbacks are few 

compared to most medical interventions, as the procedure is noninvasive. 

EEG biofeedback falls outside the remaining medical paradigms of pharmacologic 

and surgical interventions and has therefore been given short shrift. It is a 

powerful tool, too seldom used. In states where its coverage by medical 

insurance is mandated, benefit has become evident. A serious look at the 

effectiveness of EEG biofeedback would result in its inclusion among mandated 

treatments. 

Robert M. Woznicki M.D. 

640 Belle Terre Rd, Bldg J 

Port Jefferson, NY 11777
Editorial Note on Part 365
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 365 appear at 66 FR 49870, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 365.105T Starting the application process: Form OP-1. ( a ) ( 1 ) Each applicant must file the appropriate form in the OP-1 series. Form OP-1 must be filed when requesting authority to operate as a motor property carrier, a broker of general freight, or a broker of household goods; Form OP-1(P) must be filed when requesting authority to operate as a motor passenger carrier; Form OP-1(FF) must be filed when requesting authority to operate as a freight forwarder; Form OP-1(MX) must be filed by a Mexico-domiciled motor property, including household goods, carrier, or a motor passenger carrier requesting authority to operate within the United States; and effective December 16, 2009.
( 2 ) Form OP-1(NNA) must be filed by a non-North America-domiciled motor property, including household goods, carrier or a motor passenger carrier requesting authority to operate within the United States. A separate filing fee in the amount set forth at 49 CFR 360.3T(f)(1) is required for each type of authority sought.
( b ) Obtain forms at a FMCSA Division Office in each State or at one of the FMCSA Service Centers. Addresses and phone numbers for the Division Offices and Service Centers can be found at: *https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/mission/field-offices .* The forms and information about filing procedures can be downloaded at: *https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/registration/registration-forms .*
[82 FR 5299, Jan. 17, 2017]
§ 38.105 Priority seating signs. ( a ) Each car shall contain sign(s) which indicate that certain seats are priority seats for persons with disabilities and that other passengers should make such seats available to those who wish to use them.
( b ) Characters on signs required by paragraph (a) shall have a width-to-height ratio between 3:5 and 1:1 and a stroke width-to-height ratio between 1:5 and 1:10, with a minimum character height (using an upper case “X”) of 5 ⁄ 8 inch, with “wide” spacing (generally, the space between letters shall be 1 ⁄ 16 the height of upper case letters), and shall contrast with the background either light-on-dark or dark-on-light.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1576
HARRY S. LEAR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GIANT FOODS INC., Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-3691-JFM) Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 13, 1996 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harry S. Lear, Appellant Pro Se. Robert G. Ames, Karen D. Woodard, VENABLE, BAETJER, HOWARD & CIVILETTI, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissinghis employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lear v. Giant Foods Inc. , No. CA-95-3691-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### §§ 37.97-37.99 [Reserved]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1204.html[7/22/2015 3:43:50 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-h6in

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1204

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: michael dunne

General Comment

I what you the government to stay out of our business and take care of what you can not seem to do now!!!
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
Quarter Ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") by Applied Spectrum Technologies,
Inc. ("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.


Date:  August 11, 2003                       /s/ Mark R. Littell
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Mark R. Littell
                                             Chief Executive Officer



                                             /s/ Mark R. Littell
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Mark R. Littell
                                             Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8614

CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

JON OZMINT, Director; MARY BROWN, Clerk; KERRIE SPECHT, 

Parole Officer; RALPH HUNTER, DHO; MR. STEVEN, Case Worker; 

MRS. LAVERETTE; MR. HALLMAN, 

 Defendants – Appellees, 

 and 

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Insurance Policy 

Holder, 

 Defendant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District 

Judge. (3:07-cv-00343-PMD) 

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 28, 2009 

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Christopher A. Odom, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Mary Farrell, John 

Eric Kaufmann, Donald Ray Settana, Jr., MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA 

& STUBLEY, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v. 

Ozmint, No. 3:07-cv-00343-PMD (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2008). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*The German American Loan and Trust Company, *Respondent, v.*Samuel Richards, *Register, etc.,*Appellant.—

Order granting peremptory writ of *mandamus*reversed, with costs, and motion denied, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
----

| (1)   | the      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;    and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | November      13, 2009 | /s/      William M. Salters  |   |
|--------|------------------------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|   |                   | William      M. Salters           |   |
|   |                   | Chief      Financial Officer      |   |
# C OURT OF 

# A PPEALS

T HIRD 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS

P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547

www.txcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx

(512) 463-1733

JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE

DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE

BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE

MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE

SCOTT K. FIELD, JUSTICE

CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK

October 23, 2015

Mr. Dana M. Campbell

Owens, Campbell & Aiken, LLP

700 N Pearl St Ste 1600

Dallas, TX 75201-4148

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

The Honorable Scott H. Jenkins

Judge, 53rd District Court

P. O. Box 1748

Austin, TX 78767

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Mr. Robert Clary

Robert Clary PLLC

7010 McKamy Blvd.

Dallas, TX 75248

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

The Honorable Velva L. Price

Civil District Clerk

Travis County Courthouse

P. O. Box 1748

Austin, TX 78767

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Ms. Chavela Crain

Official Court Reporter

53rd District Court

P. O. Box 1748

Austin, TX 78767-1748

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Mr. David Hutchins

Howry Breen & Herman LLP

1900 Pearl

Austin, TX 78705

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Mr. Randy Howry

Howry, Breen & Herman, L.L.P.

1900 Pearl Street

Austin, TX 78705-5408

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03-15-00621-CV

Trial Court Case Number: D-1-GN-11-002012

v.

The Supreme Court of Texas ordered the above cause TRANSFERRED to the Seventh Court of

Appeals. The record has been forwarded to the Seventh Court of Appeals, Amarillo, Texas, on the

date noted above. Style: Appellant, 338 Industries, LLC, d/b/a Stratified Data// Cross-Appellant, Point Com,

LLC d/b/a White Lion Internet Agency

Appellee, Point Com, LLC d/b/a White Lion Internet Agency// Cross-Appellee, 338

Industries, LLC, d/b/a Stratified DataVery truly yours,

JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK

BY: 

# Amy Strother

Amy Strother, Deputy Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 895 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 895

              To abolish the Advanced Technology Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2001

  Mr. Royce introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                          Committee on Science

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To abolish the Advanced Technology Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

    The National Institute of Standards and Technology Act is amended--
            (1) in section 2(d) (15 U.S.C. 272(d)), by striking ``25, 
        26, and 28'' and inserting ``25 and 26'';
            (2) in section 10(h)(1) (15 U.S.C. 278(h)(1)), by striking 
        ``, including the Program established under section 28,''; and
            (3) by striking section 28.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 99

        Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                                       of
                      Berger Holdings, Ltd. (the "Company")


We, Theodore A. Schwartz and Francis E. Wellock, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

..    the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
     2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

..    the information contained in the Report presents, in all material respects,
     the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 14, 2002
                                           By:  /s/ Theodore A. Schwartz
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Theodore A. Schwartz
                                                Chief Executive Officer

                                           By:  /s/ Francis E. Wellock, Jr.
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Francis E. Wellock, Jr.
                                                Chief Financial Officer
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, October 12, 1995 (127), Para 127.33 Adjournment]
[Page 1527]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.127.33  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. GREENWOOD, at 10 o'clock and 2 minutes p.m., the 
House adjourned.
```
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1420.html[7/23/2015 9:41:59 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvn-6rb7

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1420

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: christine martucci

Address:

34133 iris lane

eastlake, OH, 45095

General Comment

I am competent and able to plan for my own retirement. Let people take responsibility for their own future. We

 don't need the government telling us what to

 do when it comes to personal finance. Let us make our own decisions whether they are good or bad. I do not

 want to or will I be dependent on the government

 when I work hard and plan for my future. This country should protect the people not tell them what to do!
ED STq T

~

S 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

o ~~~~~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

z ~llft► 2 0 

~~114 PR01tO\ 

MAR 1 2 2012 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Mr. J. R. Stroble 

Manager, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

On August 30, 2011, the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) requested, as a Tier 1(Tl ) change, that the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approve remote-handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) waste stream 

IN-ID-NRF-SPC (Naval Reactors Facility (NRF)) at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) for disposal at 

the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). EPA has reviewed the information provided and approves the 

addition of these containers from waste stream IN-ID-NRF-SPC. As a result, INL may dispose of this 

waste at the WIPP. This approval also allows future. addition of waste to this stream with a waste 

pedigree (radiological and physical contents) similar to the waste approved in this letter and as detailed 

in the report. The enclosed report, EPA Docket No. A-98-49; II-A4-159, supports EPA's approval 

decision. 

If you have any questions regarding this approval, pleasc contact Raiani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462 or 

Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422. 

Sincerely, 

Tom Peake, Director 

Center for Waste Management an(i Regulations 

Enclosure 

Internet Address (URL) • http /lwww.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorrne Free Recycled Paper 
cc: Electronic Distribution 

Christine Gelles, DOE EM 

Alton Harris, DOE EM 

Joe Franco, CBFO 

Ed Ziemianski, CBFO 

Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP 

Courtland Fesmire, CBFO QA 

Irene Quintana, WTS-CCP 

D K Ploetz, WTS-CCP 

Mike Sensibaugh, WTS-CCP 

Mark Pearcy, WTS-CCP 

John Kieling, NMED 

Trais Kilphuis, NMED 

Tim Hall, NMED 

Raymond Lee, EPA HQ 

Site Documents