alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0848.html[7/21/2015 4:07:53 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-w7ko

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0848

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I do not need anyone especially the government telling me what to do or how to spend my retirement.

Please focus on other issues and leave our hard earned money alone.
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1145.html[7/22/2015 2:41:35 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-4oc5

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1145

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

We the PEOPLE of America can handle our own retirement and we the PEOPLE do not want the Government

 entangled in any of our affairs. The Supreme Court is not able to make laws period. They are only to suggest as

 to whether a law is constitutional period. the Legislative Congress is the only entity that is Constitutionally

 allowed to make laws. Abortion is illegal and Unconstitutional and Gay Marriage taking that right away from

 the States is also Unconstitutional and a sham. America was created to have the right of choice for all Americans

 period and anything else is Unconstitutional and illegal period!!!!!
§ 25.545 Pre-employment inquiries. ( a ) *Marital status.* A recipient shall not make pre-employment inquiry as to the marital status of an applicant for employment, including whether such applicant is “Miss” or “Mrs.”
( b ) *Sex.* A recipient may make pre-employment inquiry as to the sex of an applicant for employment, but only if such inquiry is made equally of such applicants of both sexes and if the results of such inquiry are not used in connection with discrimination prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0981.html[7/21/2015 7:10:57 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-j8c1

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0981

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: charles maurhoff

General Comment

the government has no constitutional authority to meddle with my retirement money. everything the government

 touches gets messed up. leave my retirement accounts alone!
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Century Properties FundXIX, LP (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer ofthe Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financialofficer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

      /s/Steven D. Cordes

Name: Steven D. Cordes

Date: November 12, 2010

 

 

      /s/Stephen B. Waters

Name: Stephen B. Waters

Date: November 12, 2010

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 225

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States

Postal Service should issue a postage stamp commemorating the Fisk

Jubilee Singers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 2001

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the United States Postal Service should issue a postage

stamp commemorating the Fisk Jubilee Singers.

Whereas 6 months after the end of the Civil War, the Fisk

School was established in Nashville, Tennessee;

Whereas the Fisk School was designed by its founders to be

an educational institution open to all, regardless of race

or age;

Whereas the Fisk School was incorporated as Fisk University

in 1867;

Whereas funding for the opening of the school was secured

through the sale of slave paraphernalia;
2

•HRES 225 IH

Whereas in 1871 a group of students at Fisk University

formed a choral group, the Fisk Jubilee Singers, with the

goal of raising money to finance the institution;

Whereas in that same year the Fisk Jubilee Singers took all

the funds in the University treasury with them for travel

expenses and set off on a tour of the United States and

Europe;

Whereas during their first tour the Jubilee Singers raised

enough money to preserve their university and pay for

the construction of Jubilee Hall, the South’s first permanent structure built for the education of black students;

Whereas the Jubilee Singers introduced the world to the spiritual as a musical genre; and

Whereas the Fisk Jubilee Singers continue to tour and perform and have received countless awards and honors:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) the United States Postal Service should

4 issue a postage stamp commemorating the Fisk Ju5 bilee Singers; and

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

7 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

8 such a stamp be issued.

Æ
#### Isidore Cuba, Respondent, *v.*Louis Druskin et al., Appellants.

*Cuba*v. Druskin, 135 App. Div. 508, affirmed.

(Argued May 2, 1911;

decided May 16, 1911.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 30, 1909, which reversed a determination of the Appellate Term, affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor of defendants, and directed judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action by a purchaser of real property against the vendors to recover for a breach of a covenant against incumbrances contained in the deed.

*Abraham H. Sarasohn*for appellants.

*Leon Kronfeld*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, • Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          23,601
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,711
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,020
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     79,085
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        397,033
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 535,021
<DEPOSITS>                                     413,960
<SHORT-TERM>                                    13,825
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,636
<LONG-TERM>                                     49,445
<COMMON>                                         1,217
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,938
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 535,021
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 25,950
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,744
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   509
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                30,203
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,745
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,733
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           16,470
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      585
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (33)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,050
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,414
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,414
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: lauri.watkins@gmail.com [mailto:lauri.watkins@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 5:14 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lauri Watkins 

1707 Boylston Ave, #201 

Seattle, WA 98122
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
333-69741 and 333-84447 of CNA Financial Corporation and subsidiaries on Forms
S-3 and S-8, respectively, of our reports dated February 26, 2004 (which
reports express unqualified opinions and include an explanatory paragraph
concerning the adoption of a new accounting principle relating to a change in
method of accounting for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets in
2002), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CNA Financial Corporation
and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2003. Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 27, 2004
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D2 3

- 2028 Lower Tribunal No. 03

- DR

- 000038

_____________________________ L IGIA H ERRERA , Appellant ,

v. J UAN H ERRERA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County

. Lisa S. Porter , Judge. April 9, 202 4
PER CURIAM

. AFFIRMED

. TRAVER , C

. J. , and STARGEL and WOZNIAK , JJ., c oncur.

Roy W. Foxall, of Roy W. Foxall, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellant. Reuben A. Doupé , of Coleman, Taylor, Klaus, Doupé, Diaz & Torre z , P.A. , Naples , for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         117,064
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,289,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                    80,509
<INVENTORY>                                  2,110,815
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,539,404
<PP&E>                                       4,642,245
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,115,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,449,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,428,278
<BONDS>                                      4,187,643
<COMMON>                                       134,362
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,018,747)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,449,097
<SALES>                                      1,314,899
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,801,749
<CGS>                                          591,325
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,739,072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             145,083
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,908)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,908)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,908)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           19409
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      188
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 19943
<PP&E>                                            5736
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2616
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   23167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              473
<BONDS>                                           4718
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       17976
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     23167
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 25676
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 246
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  24675
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              24675
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1377)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     23338
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   295.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   295.59
        

</TABLE>
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-04-00794- CR
Bas ili a M ar ti ne z Hon e m an, App e lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee
F ROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF COM AL COUNTY NO. 2001CR19 55, H ONO RAB LE BRENDA CHAP MAN, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N On August 17, 2004, Basilia Mar tinez Honeman was adjudg ed guilty of possessing marihuana

and sente nced to twe nty

day s in jail. The deadline f or per fec ting a

ppeal wa s September 16, 2 0 0 4 . Tex. R. App. P . 26.2(a) (1). On Septe mber 21, Hone man filed a document in the trial c le rk ’s of fi c e that w a s tr e ate d a s a no tic e of a pp e a l and fo rw ard e d to thi s Co ur

t. A ssumi ngthi s do c ume nt m anif

e ste d a de sir e to a

pp e a l, be c a

us e it wa s untim e ly fi le d we la c k jur isd ic tio n to dis po se of t he purported appeal i n any manner other than by dismiss ing it for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v . S tate , 9 81 S.W. 2d

20 8 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 98 ); Ol iv o v . S tate , 9 1 8 S.W .2d 519, 52 2 - 2 3 ( T e x. Crim. App. 1996).2 The a ppeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

David Pury ear , J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Patter son and Pury ear Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: January

18, 2005 Do No t Pu

bli sh
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBuckling and postbuckling behavior of compression-loaded isotropic plates with cutoutsAn experimental study of the buckling and postbuckling behavior of square and rectangular compression loaded aluminum plates with centrally located circular, square, and elliptical cutouts is presented. Experimental results indicate that the plates exhibit overall trends of increasing buckling strain and decreasing initial postbuckling stiffness with increasing cutout width. Corresponding plates with circular and square cutouts of the same width buckle at approximately the same strain level, and exhibit approximately the same initial postbuckling stiffness. Results show that the reduction in initial postbuckling stiffness due to a cutout generally decreases as the plate aspect ratio increases. Other results presented indicate that square plates with elliptical cutouts having a large cutout-width-to-plate-width ratio generally lose prebuckling and initial postbuckling stiffness as the cutout height increases. However, the plates buckle at essentially the same strain level. Results also indicate that postbuckling stiffness is more sensitive to changes in elliptical cutout height than are prebuckling stiffness and buckling strain.Document ID19900019543Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsNemeth, Michael P.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1990Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberL-16789NAS 1.60:3024NASA-TP-3024Meeting InformationMeeting: AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials ConferenceLocation: Long Beach, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: April 2, 1990End Date: April 4, 1990Accession Number90N28859Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-01-08Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900019543.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 that to the best of his knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Union Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union Bankshares,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


/s/ Kenneth D. Gibbons
----------------------
Kenneth D. Gibbons
Chief Executive Officer

May 15, 2008

                                      38
§ 375.521 What must I do if an individual shipper wants to know the actual weight or charges for a shipment before I tender delivery? ( a ) If an individual shipper of a shipment being transported on a collect-on-delivery basis specifically requests notification of the actual weight or volume and charges on the shipment, you must comply with this request. This requirement is conditioned upon the individual shipper's supplying you with an address or telephone number where the individual shipper will receive the communication. You must make your notification by telephone; in person; fax transmissions; e-mail; overnight courier; or certified mail, return receipt requested.
( b ) The individual shipper must receive your notification at least one full 24-hour day before any tender of the shipment for delivery, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and Federal holidays.
( c ) You may disregard the 24-hour notification requirement on shipments in any one of the following three circumstances: ( 1 ) The shipment will be back weighed (*i.e.,* weighed at destination).
( 2 ) Pickup and delivery encompass two consecutive weekdays, if the individual shipper agrees.
( 3 ) The shipment is moving under a non-binding estimate and the maximum payment required at time of delivery is 110 percent of the estimated charges, but only if the individual shipper agrees to waive the 24-hour notification requirement.
[68 FR 35091, June 11, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 10576, Mar. 5, 2004]