alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1


    Exhibit
      4.1

     

    FIRST
      AMENDMENT

    


    TO
      THE

    


    AMENDED
      AND RESTATED

    


    LIMITED
      PARTNERSHIP

    


    OF

    


    PLM
      EQUIPMENT GROWTH FUND VI

    


    


    


    THIS
      FIRST AMENDMENT (“AMENDMENT”) TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
      AGREEMENT (“AGREEMENT”) OF PLM EQUIPMENT GROWTH FUND VI (“PARTNERSHIP”) IS
      EXECUTED AS NOVEMEBER 21, 1996, BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER, PLM FINANCIAL SERVICES,
      INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION (“GENERAL PARTNER”), PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XVIII OF
      THE AGREEMENT. ALL CAPITALIZED TERMS NOT OTHERWISE DEFINED HEREIN SHALL HAVE
      THE
      MEANINGS AS SET FORTH IN THE AGREEMENT.

    


    


    RECITALS

    


    THE
      PARTNERS ENTERED INTO A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT AS OF APRIL 22, 1991,
      AND
      AN AMENDED AND RESTATED LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT AS OF DECEMBER 20,
      1991.

    


    THE
      GENERAL PARTNER NOW AMENDS THE AGREEMENT, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XVIII, PARAGRAPH
      TWO, SUBSECTIONS (I) AND (II), TO ADD FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE LIMITED PARTNERS,
      TO THE GENERAL PARTNER’S REPRESENTATIONSA AND OBLIGATIONS, TO CURE ANY AMBIGUITY
      OR TO CORRECT ANY INCONSISTENCY THAT MAY EXIST AMONG SECTIONS 6.01, 6.02 AND
      9.02 OF THE AGREEMENT. IN EXECUTING THIS AMENDMENT THE GENERAL PARTNER
      REPRESENTS, WARRANTS AND AGREES, AND WILL TAKE ALL ACTION TO ENSURE, THAT THIS
      AMENDMENT DOES NOT, AND WILL NOT, DETRIMENTALLY AFFECT THE CASH DISTRIBUTIONS
      OF
      THE LIMITED PARTNERS OR ASSIGNEES OR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE PARTNERSHIP BY THE
      GENERAL PARTNER.

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE, THE AGREEMENT IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:

    


    
      	1.  	
              SECTION
                6.02 IS AMENDED TO READ IN ITS ENTIRETY AS
                FOLLOWS:

            


    

    


    “THE
      GENERAL PARTNER SHALL NOT TRANSFER ITS INTEREST AS GENERAL PARTNER IN THE
      PARTNERSHIP (WHICH TRANSFER SHALL BE DEEMED A “WITHDRAWAL” 


    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    


    


    


    AMENDMENT
      NO. 1 TO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

    PAGE
      2

    


    


    


    OF
      THE
      GENERAL PARTNER FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 9.02) OR ITS INTEREST IN THE
      PARTNERSHIP’S CAPITAL, EARNINGS OR ASSETS (EXCEPT IN CONNECTION WITH THE PLEDGE
      OF THE GENERAL PARTNER’S ASSETS OR RIGHTS IN CONNECTION WITH LOANS OR OTHER
      INDEBTEDNESS) EXCEPT UPON THE APPROVAL OF A MAJORITY IN INTEREST OF THE LIMITED
      PARTNERS.”

    


    IN
      WITHNESS WHEREOF,
      THE
      GENERAL PARTNER HAS DULY EXECUTED THIS AMENDMENT AS OF NOVEMBER 21,
      1996.

    


    


    PLM
      FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.,

    A
      DELAWARE CORPORATION,

    GENERAL
      PARTNER AND AS

    ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
      FOR AND ON

    BEHALF
      OF
      THE LIMITED PARTNERS

    


    


    


    BY:_______________________________

    TITLE:____________________________

    NAME:____________________________
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.

Leslie C. Abbott

Senior Attorney

919 18th Street, NW, Suite 600

Washington, D.C. 20006

(202) 263-6285

(202) 263-6291 Fax

Leslie.abbott@wnco.com

_______________________________________________________________________________

September 25, 2013

Via email 

Esta Rosenberg

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Esta.rosenberg@dot.gov

Re: Joint Application of Southwest Airlines and AirTran Airways for 

Renewal and Reissuance of Exemption Authority 

(US- Caribbean & US - Mexico)

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is to confirm that Southwest Airlines Co. (“Southwest”) has polled all 

carriers on the service lists attached to the above-referenced Applications that were 

filed with the Department on September 24, 2013 and there are no objections. We 

therefore respectfully request that the Department act on the Applications as soon as 

possible.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________

Leslie C. Abbott

cc: Brian Hedberg

Brett Kruger

info@airlineinfo.com
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/18/15 10:08 PM

Received: July 15, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jzu-j9m9

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2320

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anne Edwards

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement without government interference ... leave our IRA's, annuities, etc. 

alone.
November 25, 2015

Mr. Larry J. Gregory

President

Lone Star Flight Museum

P.O. Box 3099

2002 Terminal Dr.

Galveston, TX 77552

Dear Mr. Gregory:

We have received your September 29, 2015 correspondence withdrawing your November 25,

2014 petition on behalf of Lone Star Flight Museum for an exemption from §§ 91.315, 

119.5(g), and 119.21(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

Your letter has been placed in the public docket (No. FAA-2006-25434). No further action 

will be taken on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

James M. Crotty

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

11 a.m. Friday, October 26, 2007.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person For More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-4688 Filed 9-18-07; 10:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 387
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 387 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 387.311 Bonds and certificates of insurance. ( a ) *Public liability.* Each Form BMC 82 surety bond filed with the FMCSA must be for the full limits of liability required under § 387.303(b)(1). Form MCS-82 surety bonds and other forms of similar import prescribed by the Department of Transportation, may be aggregated to comply with the minimum security limits required under § 387.303(b)(1) or § 387.303(b)(2). Each Form BMC 91 certificate of insurance filed with the FMCSA will always represent the full security minimum limits required for the particular carrier, while it remains in force, under § 387.303(b)(1) or § 387.303(b)(2), whichever is applicable. Any previously executed Form BMC 91 filed before the current revision which is left on file with the FMCSA after the effective date of this regulation, and not canceled within 30 days of that date will be deemed to certify the same coverage limits as would the filing of a revised Form BMC 91. Each Form BMC 91X certificate of insurance filed with the FMCSA will represent the full security limits under § 387.303(b)(1) or § 387.303(b)(2) or the specific security limits of coverage as indicated on the face of the form. If the filing reflects aggregation, the certificate must show clearly whether the insurance is primary or, if excess coverage, the amount of underlying coverage as well as amount of the maximum limits of coverage. * Each Form BMC 91MX certificate of insurance filed with the FMCSA will represent the security limits of coverage as indicated on the face of the form. The Form BMC 91MX must show clearly whether the insurance is primary or, if excess coverage, the amount of underlying coverage as well as amount of the maximum limits of coverage.
( b ) *Cargo liability.* Each form BMC 83 surety bond filed with the FMCSA must be for the full limits of liability required under § 387.303(c). Each Form BMC 34 certificate of insurance filed with the FMCSA will represent the full security limits under § 387.303(c) or the specific security limits of coverage as indicated on the face of the form. If the filing reflects aggregation, the certificate must show clearly whether the insurance is primary or, if excess coverage, the amount of underlying coverage as well as amount of the maximum limits of coverage.
( c ) Each policy of insurance in connection with the certificate of insurance which is filed with the FMCSA, shall be amended by attachment of the appropriate endorsement prescribed by the FMCSA and the certificate of insurance filed must accurately reflect that endorsement.
[47 FR 55944, Dec. 14, 1982, as amended at 48 FR 43332, Sept. 23, 1983; 48 FR 51781, Nov. 14, 1983; 50 FR 40030, Oct. 1, 1985; 62 FR 49941, Sept. 24, 1997; 68 FR 56199, Sept. 30, 2003] Footnotes -
387.311
*Note: Aggregation to meet the requirement of § 387.303(b)(1) will not be allowed until the completion of our rulemaking in Ex Parte No. MC-5 (Sub-No. 2), *Motor Carrier and Freight Forwarder Insurance Procedures and Minimum Amounts of Liability.*
exv10w23wf



 








EXHIBIT 10.23f




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

CONNECTICUT WATER SERVICE, INC.

2004 PERFORMANCE STOCK PROGRAM




     This First Amendment to the Connecticut Water Service, Inc. 2004 Performance Stock Program
(the “Plan”) is adopted this 1st day of December, 2005 by the Connecticut Water Service,
Inc. (the “Company”).



W I T N E S S E T H :




     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Connecticut Water Service, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the
Connecticut Water Service, Inc. 2004 Performance Stock Program (the “Plan”) on January 7, 2004 and
the Company’s shareholders approved the Plan, effective April 23, 2004; and



     WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right to the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors to amend the Plan in Section 14 thereof; and



     WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan in the manner set forth below;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Plan is hereby amended as set
forth below.

     1. The first paragraph of Section 8(c) is hereby amended to read as follows:



     “(c) Payment of Performance Share or Cash Unit Awards. Performance Share Unit or Performance
Cash Unit Awards shall be payable in the number of shares of Stock or that amount of cash
determined in accordance with Section 8(b). Payments of Performance Cash Unit Awards shall be made
as soon as practicable after the completion of an Award Period. Performance Share Units shall be
credited to the Participant’s Performance Share Account as



 









 




soon as practicable after the completion of the Award Period and the satisfaction of the
requirements of any vesting schedule established by the Committee with respect to the Award.




     2. Except as hereby amended, the Plan remains in full force and effect.



-2-
1210-AB32-2-1069.html[7/23/2015 3:42:38 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-rc69

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1561

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Erin Link

General Comment

To Whom This May Concern:

I am fully capable in planning and budgeting my own retirement. The government and DOL will certainly be

 overstepping my rights and boundaries getting involved. I am a hardworking citizen and now a small business

 owner all at my own and the good Lords hands, NOT the government. I am not considered a minority and I

 receive NO handouts nor do I seek them. I pay my taxes, I am a law abiding citizen, I am responsible to my

 community and I want my rights protected and the government to stay out of my business.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1105.html[7/22/2015 11:12:43 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-uqys

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1105

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: G Michael Cinko

General Comment

Please do not further restrict what citizens can do with their own retirement resources. My retirement savings

 belongs to ME, not you, some committee, agency or anyone else. Thus, I should be free to invest it as I please as

 I assume the risk. If you think some actions are not appropriate, then by all means restrict the actions of YOUR

 resources. But please leave me free to decide what is right for mine.
#### Rubber Trading Company, Respondent, *v.*The Fisk Rubber Company, Appellant.

*Rubber Trading Co.*v. *Fisk Rubber Co.,*136 App. Div. 939, affirmed.

(Argued May 18, 1911;

decided June 6, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 8, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract.

*William G. Phlippeau*for appellant.

*Harry D. Nims*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook, Chase and Collin, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 386
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 386 appear at 65 FR 7755, Feb. 16, 2000, and 88 FR 80182, Nov. 17, 2023.

§ 386.18 Payment of the claim. ( a ) Payment of the full amount claimed may be made at any time before issuance of a Final Agency Order and will constitute an admission of liability by the respondent of all facts alleged in the Notice of Claim, unless the parties agree in writing that payment shall not be treated as an admission. After the issuance of a Final Agency Order, claims are subject to interest, penalties, and administrative charges, in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3717; 49 CFR part 89; and 31 CFR 901.9.
( b ) If respondent elects to pay the full amount as its response to the Notice of Claim, payment must be served upon the Field Administrator at the Service Center designated in the Notice of Claim within 30 days following service of the Notice of Claim. No written reply is necessary if respondent elects the payment option during the 30-day reply period. Failure to serve full payment within 30 days of service of the Notice of Claim when this option has been chosen may constitute a default and may result in the Notice of Claim, including the civil penalty assessed by the Notice of Claim, becoming the Final Agency Order in the proceeding pursuant to § 386.14(c).
( c ) Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the parties, payment of the full amount in response to the Notice of Claim constitutes an admission of liability by the respondent of all facts alleged in the Notice of Claim. Payment waives respondent's opportunity to further contest the claim and will result in the Notice of Claim becoming the Final Agency Order.
[70 FR 28482, May 18, 2005, as amended at 77 FR 24870, Apr. 26, 2012]
# Continuation of the Exercise of Certain Authorities Under the Trading With the Enemy Act

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of the Treasury

                        Under section 101(b) of Public Law 95-223 (91 Stat. 1625; 50 U.S.C. App. 5(b) note), and a previous determination on September 13, 2006 (71                         *Fed. Reg*. 54399), the exercise of certain authorities under the Trading With the Enemy Act is scheduled to terminate on September 14, 2007.                     

I hereby determine that the continuation for 1 year of the exercise of those authorities with respect to the applicable countries is in the national interest of the United States. 

Therefore, consistent with the authority vested in me by section 101(b) of Public Law 95-223, I continue for 1 year, until September 14, 2008, the exercise of those authorities with respect to countries affected by: 

(1) the Foreign Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 500; 

(2) the Transaction Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 505; and 

(3) the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 515. 

                        The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

[FR Doc. 07-4653

Billing code 4811-33-M
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1187.html[7/22/2015 3:27:03 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-tpsg

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1187

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Tommy Dionisio

Address:

125 Wendy Acres Ave

Longview, TX, 75602

Email: ttdionisio@sbcglobal.net

Phone: 949 322-2722

General Comment

The American public is smart enough to plan for its own retirement. PLEASE keep bureaucratic hands OUT of

 our retirement plans. That is the LAST thing we need.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1470.html[7/23/2015 11:35:07 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-cv1i

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1470

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jeffrey Bassett

General Comment

I have saved for my retirement and do not want the government interfering with my retirement and giving it to

 others. I will do that myself and always have - it should not be up to the federal government to forcefully share

 my retirement, especially when the bureaucrats and congressmen considering this bill will never have their

 welfare-like pensions affected by it. The ultra-wealthy will, again, not have to pay their fair share for exploiting

 and extorting the American worker.

Leave my retirement alone!
§ 29.601 When does a withdrawal from a consortium become effective? A withdrawal from a consortium becomes effective within the time frame specified in the resolution that authorizes the Tribe to withdraw from the consortium. In the absence of a specific time frame set forth in the resolution, such withdrawal becomes effective on: ( a ) The earlier of 1 year after the date of submission of such request, or the date on which the funding agreement expires; or
( b ) Such date as may be mutually agreed upon by the Department, the withdrawing Tribe, and the consortium that has executed the compact and funding agreement.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 52045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4463]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 12, 2007 / 
Notices

[[Page 52045]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Title II Resource Advisory Committee Meeting Advisory

AGENCY: Colville National Forest, USDA, Forest Service.

ACTION:  Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Colville National Forest's Resource Advisory Committee has 
scheduled a meeting to occur in Colville, Washington. The purpose of 
the meeting is to provide recommendations for Title II projects to be 
funded by the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination 
Act, more commonly known as Payments to Counties, in Fiscal Year 2008.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Wednesday, September 26, 2007, from 
9 a.m. until 4 p.m. A public input session will be provided. Comments 
will be limited to three minutes per person. The Designated Federal 
Official may choose to cancel this meeting if appropriate.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Colville Campus of Community 
Colleges of Spokane--Colville Center, 985 South Elm Street, Colville, 
WA 99114.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Brazell, Forest Supervisory, the 
Designated Federal Official for the Colville National Forest Resource 
Advisory Committee. Colville National Forest, 765 South Main Street, 
Colville, WA 99114, 509-684-7000

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting is open to the public. Project 
discussion will be limited to Resource Advisory Committee members and 
Forest Service personnel. However, a public input session will be 
provided on the agenda, and individuals will have the opportunity to 
address the committee at that time.

    Dated: September 6, 2007.
Donald N. Gonzalez,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07-4463 Filed 9-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M