alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1257.html[7/22/2015 9:24:14 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-pxb9

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1257

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

My retirement planning is up to me - and only me. The government has no role in planning or managing my

 money - that I earned and saved. Nor is there anything in the Constitution granting government the power to be

 involved in my retirement planning.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed

January 9 , 2024.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 23

- 00706

- CV

IN RE SPRING INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 234th District Court Har ris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2022

- 78089



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 25, 2023 , relator Spring Independent School District filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221;
see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In t he petition, relator asks this c ourt to compel the Honorable Lauren Reeder, presiding judge of the 234th District Court of Harris2

County
, to vacate the trial court ’ s July 17, 2023 order granting plaintiff ’ s motion to compel discovery responses and the trial court ’ s September 18, 2023 order denying
relator ’ s motion to reconsider

. Relator ha s not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator ’ s petition for wri t of mandamus.

P ER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Jus tices Jewell, Sp ain, and Hassan.
§ 37.27 Transportation for elementary and secondary education systems. ( a ) The requirements of this part do not apply to public school transportation.
( b ) The requirements of this part do not apply to the transportation of school children to and from a private elementary or secondary school, and its school-related activities, if the school is providing transportation service to students with disabilities equivalent to that provided to students without disabilities. The test of equivalence is the same as that provided in § 37.105. If the school does not meet the requirement of this paragraph for exemption from the requirements of this part, it is subject to the requirements of this part for private entities not primarily engaged in transporting people.
[56 FR 45621, Sept. 6, 1991, as amended at 61 FR 25415, May 21, 1996]
1210-AB32-2-1161.html[7/24/2015 7:10:22 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvr-e8pe

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1655

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Government is in my paycheck, in my food choices, in my education, in my healthcare, please stay out of my

 retirement! I can take care of myself.
NO. 12-10-00169-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

NIJINSKI TWON MURPHY,

APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 420TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, ' NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by 

Appellant and his counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, 

Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.2(a).

Opinion delivered October 20, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 171 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 20, 2001.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2216) making supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2001, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall 
be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The amendment printed in 
part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution 
shall be considered as adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole. 
Points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, for failure to 
comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. The amendment printed in part B of 
the report of the Committee on Rules may be offered only by a Member designated 
in the report and only at the appropriate point in the reading of the bill, 
shall be considered as read, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be 
subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 
Committee of the Whole. All points of order against the amendment printed in 
part B of the report are waived. During consideration of the bill for further 
amendment, the Chairman of the Committee on the Whole may accord priority in 
recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused 
it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that 
purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as 
read. During consideration of the bill, as amended, points of order against 
amendments for failure to comply with clause 2(e) of rule XXI are waived. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 
and report the bill, as amended, to the House with such further amendments as 
may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05872

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

05872\05872_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

05872\05872_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05872\05872_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05872\05872_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05872\05872_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05872\05872_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05872\05872_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05872\5872_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05872\Certification Statement Plant ID 05872.pdf Plant certification statement

x 05872\Follow-up\2011-02-01 Response to ERG Arron Williams.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 05872\Follow-up\Follow Up Responses (2) 2.28.2011.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

05872\Supplemental Documents\05872_A5-2 Map 1 aerial.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05872\Supplemental Documents\05872_A5-2 Map 2 usgs.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05872\Supplemental Documents\05872_A5-2 Map 3 Plantsite.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05872\Supplemental Documents\05872_A5-2 Map 4 Landfill.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05872\Supplemental Documents\05872_AEP ELGs ICR submittal letter 10-13-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05872\Supplemental Documents\05872_composite WB-1 & D-1 diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Century Properties FundXIX, LP (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer ofthe Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financialofficer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

      /s/Steven D. Cordes

Name: Steven D. Cordes

Date: May 13, 2011

 

 

      /s/Stephen B. Waters

Name: Stephen B. Waters

Date: May 13, 2011

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
NO. 04-16-00786 

IN THE 

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS 

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 

ANTHONY MOORE AND JOANN MOORE, 

Appellant 

v.

DAVID SUBIA, 

Appellee 

__________________________________________________________________ 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law, Bexar County, Texas 

APPELLEE’S OPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE HIS BRIEF 

TO THE HONORABLE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS: 

 APPELLEE, DAVID SUBIA (“Appellee”), respectfully present his Motion 

for Extension of Time to file His Brief, and would respectfully show the Court as 

follows: 

I.

 On August 21, 2017, Appellants filed their Amended Brief. Appellee’s 

Brief was due on September 20, 2017. Appellees request an extension of time to 

file their brief for the following reasons: 

ACCEPTED

04-16-00786-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

9/25/2017 2:27 PM

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/25/2017 2:27:41 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE CLERK
2

 The undersigned attended numerous hearings during the week of August 21, 

2017 to August 25, 2017 in child custody and real estate matters;

 The undersigned participated in a two-day mediation on August 30, 2017 

and September 1, 2017;

 The undersigned worked on a petition for review to the Texas Supreme 

Court during the week of September 5, 2017 to September 8, 2017;

 The undersigned’s office was closed for Labor Day on September 4, 2017; 

and

 The length of Appellants’ Brief requires additional time to respond.

II.

Appellee asks this Court to extend the time to file their Brief for thirty days 

up to and including October 20, 2017. Appellants have been granted numerous 

extensions of time in the past.

III.

This motion is not brought for purposes of delay but solely that justice may 

be served.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, APPELLEE prays that he be 

given an additional thirty (30) days to respond to Appellants’ Brief. Appellee

prays for such other relief to which he may be entitled consistent with this Court’s 

ruling.
3

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Christopher J. Deeves

CHRISTOPHER J. DEEVES

State Bar No. 00790575

THE LAW OFFICE OF

CHRISTOPHER DEEVES, P.C.

1370 Pantheon Way, Suite 110

San Antonio, Texas 78232

(210) 445-8807

(210) 501-0915 (fax)

e-mail: chrisdeeves@att.net

ATTORNEY FOR

APPELLEE

DAVID SUBIA

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

On September 20, 2017, Appellee’s counsel called pro se Appellant, 

Anthony Moore, who refused to discuss this matter without a submission in 

writing. A proposed motion was sent to him. Pro se Appellant then filed an 

opposition to this motion without ever receiving the proposed motion or discussing 

it. This motion is therefore opposed.

/s/ Christopher J. Deeves

CHRISTOPHER J. DEEVES
4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This will certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was served as indicated to the following counsel of record listed below 

on September 25, 2017:

Via Priority Mail

Anthony Moore

Joann Moore

P.O. Box 340096

San Antonio, Texas 78234

/s/ Christopher J. Deeves

CHRISTOPHER J. DEEVES
#### § 379.3 Records required to be retained.

Companies subject to this part shall retain records for the minimum retention periods provided in appendix A to this part. After the required retention periods, the records may be destroyed at the discretion of each company's management. It shall be the obligation of the subject company to maintain records that adequately support financial and operational data required by the Secretary. The company may request a ruling from the Secretary on the retention of any record. The provisions of this part shall not be construed as excusing compliance with the lawful requirements of any other governmental body prescribing longer retention periods for any category of records.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0900.html[7/21/2015 5:51:11 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-xoge

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0900

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: bryon mead

General Comment

I can plan for my own retirement, I do not need the government to plan it for me!
#### § 24.209 Relocation payments not considered as income.

No relocation payment received by a displaced person or person required to move temporarily under this part shall be considered as income for the purpose of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, which has been redesignated as the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (title 26, U.S.C.), or for the purpose of determining the eligibility or the extent of eligibility of any person for assistance under the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 *et seq.*) or any other Federal law, except for any Federal law providing low-income housing assistance.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1359.html[7/23/2015 6:18:04 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvl-wfei

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1359

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Alan Pensiero

Address:

7330 NW 37th Street # 3

Hollywood, FL, 33024

Email: sunpensi@yahoo.com

General Comment

Leave the decision-making to me, please. It's my hard-earned money, not yours.
#### John S. Harris *v.*Aaron Healy, *Respondent.*David Van Wart, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
Editorial Note on Part 386
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 386 appear at 65 FR 7755, Feb. 16, 2000, and 88 FR 80182, Nov. 17, 2023.

§ 386.81 General. ( a ) The amounts of civil penalties that can be assessed for regulatory violations subject to the proceedings in this subchapter are established in the statutes granting enforcement powers. The determination of the actual civil penalties assessed in each proceeding is based on those defined limits or minimums and consideration of information available at the time the claim is made concerning the nature, gravity of the violation and, with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, history of prior offenses, effect on ability to continue to do business, and such other matters as justice and public safety may require. In addition to these factors, a civil penalty assessed under 49 U.S.C. 14901(a) and (d) concerning household goods is also based on the degree of harm caused to a shipper and whether the shipper has been adequately compensated before institution of the civil penalty proceeding. In adjudicating the claims and orders under the administrative procedures herein, additional information may be developed regarding these factors that may affect the final amount of the claim.
( b ) When assessing penalties for violations of notices and orders or settling claims based on these assessments, consideration will be given to good faith efforts to achieve compliance with the terms of the notices and orders.
[56 FR 10184, Mar. 11, 1991, as amended at 65 FR 7756, Feb. 16, 2000; 78 FR 60232, Oct. 1, 2013]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 179 (Monday, September 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52950-52951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4453]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11004 and <greek-i>11005]


Minnesota Disaster Number MN-00011

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 3.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Minnesota (FEMA-1717-DR), dated 08/23/
2007.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 08/18/2007 through 08/31/2007.
    Effective Date: 09/04/2007.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/22/2007.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/23/2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of Minnesota, dated 08/23/2007 is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:

Primary Counties: Dodge.

[[Page 52951]]

    All other counties contiguous to the above named primary county 
have previously been declared.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 07-4453 Filed 9-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1268.html[7/22/2015 9:32:52 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-h75f

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1268

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Benjamin Fuchs

General Comment

I am more than able to plan for my retirement on my own. I do not need any help deciding how to invest my

 money from this department. I am against any action(s) on your part that would limit my choice, or "help" me

 make the correct choice.
**Exhibit 24.6**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS** that I, **Sue L. Gin**do hereby appoint John W. Roweand William A. Von Hoene, Jr., or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2008 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to befiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**Sue L. Gin**

**DATE: February 4, 2009**
#### § 236.335 Dogs, stops and trunnions of mechanical locking.

Driving pieces, dogs, stops and trunnions shall be rigidly secured to locking bars. Swing dogs shall have full and free movement. Top plates shall be maintained securely in place.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1

                    
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JAN-2-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  Jul-4-1998
<CASH>                        2,058,721
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 4,252,318
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   3,432,997
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              10,893,306
<PP&E>                        15,295,487
<DEPRECIATION>                9,956,621
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                16,388,996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         2,316,907
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      1,329,204
<OTHER-SE>                    12,276,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  16,388,996
<SALES>                       11,366,266
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              11,366,266
<CGS>                         6,249,579
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 6,249,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              463,401
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               1,324,388
<INCOME-TAX>                  488,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  836,388
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .46
<FN>
(1) Adjusted to give retroactive  effect to a 10% stock dividend payable in
June 1998.  Prior Financial Data Schedules have not been restated for this stock
dividend.
</FN>

        

</TABLE>