alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.307 What happens after a motor carrier begins operations as a new entrant? After a new entrant satisfies all applicable pre-operational requirements, it will be subject to the new entrant safety monitoring procedures for a period of 18 months. During this 18-month period: ( a ) The new entrant's roadside safety performance will be closely monitored to ensure the new entrant has basic safety management controls that are operating effectively.
( b ) A safety audit will be conducted on the new entrant, once it has been in operation for enough time to have sufficient records to allow the agency to evaluate the adequacy of its basic safety management controls. This period will generally be at least 3 months.
( c ) All records and documents required for the safety audit shall be made available for inspection upon request by an individual certified under FMCSA regulations to perform safety audits.
[67 FR 31983, May 13, 2002, as amended at 73 FR 76488, Dec. 16, 2008]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn examination of impact damage in glass-phenolic and aluminum honeycomb core composite panelsAn examination of low velocity impact damage to glass-phenolic and aluminum core honeycomb sandwich panels with carbon-epoxy facesheets is presented. An instrumented drop weight impact test apparatus was utilized to inflict damage at energy ranges between 0.7 and 4.2 joules. Specimens were checked for extent of damage by cross sectional examination. The effect of core damage was assessed by subjecting impact-damaged beams to four-point bend tests. Skin-only specimens (facings not bonded to honeycomb) were also tested for comparison purposes. Results show that core buckling is the first damage mode, followed by delaminations in the facings, matrix cracking, and finally fiber breakage. The aluminum honeycomb panels exhibited a larger core damage zone and more facing delaminations than the glass-phenolic core, but could withstand more shear stress when damaged than the glass-phenolic core specimens.Document ID19900018560Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsNettles, A. T.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Lance, D. G.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Hodge, A. J.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1990Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:3042NASA-TP-3042Accession Number90N27876Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900018560.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Retail - Monthly    >FAQs    >Monthly Retail FAQs    >General FAQs
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Monthly Retail Trade Survey - General FAQs  Who uses the statistics produced from data collected in the Monthly Retail Trade Survey (MRTS)? The Bureau of Economic Analysis uses these data for the nation's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) estimates and in developing the national accounts' input-output tables.
	The Bureau of Labor Statistics uses these data as input to its Producer Price Indices and in developing productivity measurements.
	Trade and professional organizations use these data to analyze industry trends and benchmark their own statistical programs, develop forecasts, and evaluate regulatory requirements.
	The media use these data for news reports and background information.
	Private businesses use these data to measure market share, analyze business potential, and plan investments. What kinds of businesses are included in the Monthly Retail Trade Survey (MRTS)? 
  Are the statistics produced from the Monthly Retail Trade Survey available at the state or other sub-national level? Economic Census County Business Patterns
  Why is the Monthly Retail Trade Survey conducted?   What is The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)? NAICS
  Are sales taxes included in published sales estimates?   If a firm sells to both household consumers and businesses from the same location, are sales to businesses excluded?   What is sampling variability and how do I interpret it? 
  What steps does the Census Bureau undertake to ensure the confidentiality of the respondents' data? Title 13
  How are gift certificates/cards treated?   What types of transactions are considered e-commerce sales, when collected as part of the Monthlyl Retail Trade Survey (MRTS/MARTS)?   Are e-commerce sales included in current monthly retail sales estimates?   Where are e-commerce sales tabulated for traditional brick-and-mortar retailers?


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
# 2024

# 2023

# 2022

# 2021

# 2020

# 2019

# 2018

# 2017

# 2016

# 2015

# 2014

# 2013

# 2012

# 2011

# 2010

# 2009

# 2008

# 2007

# 2006

# 2005

# 2004

# 2003

# 2002

# 2001

# 2000

# 1999

# 1998

# 1997

# 1996

# 1995

# 1994

# 1993

# 1992
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 21, 2014

No. 04-14-00362-CV

IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF TERRY L. GILMER AN INCAPACITATED PERSON,

From the County Court at Law, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-070-PR

Honorable Bill R. Palmer, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was due June 30, 2014. The trial court clerk has filed a notification of 

late clerk’s record, requesting an extension to August 5, 2014. We GRANT the request and 

ORDER the trial court clerk to file the clerk’s record on or before August 5, 2014.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of July, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
|   | 1. | The      Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 4, 2009,      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof      (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      J. Robert Patterson                     |
|--------------------------------------------------|
| J.      Robert Patterson                         |
| Vice      President, Finance and                 |
| Chief      Financial OfficerAugust 17,      2009 |

----
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 31, 1995 (137), Para 137.28 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1821]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.137.28  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. REGULA: Committee of conference. Conference report on 
     H.R. 1977. A bill making appropriations for the Department of 
     the Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 
     September 30, 1996, and for other purposes (Rept. No. 104-
     300). Ordered to be printed.
       Mrs. WALDHOLTZ: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 251. 
     Resolution providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 
     1833) to amend title 18, United States Code, to ban partial-
     birth abortions (Rept. No. 104-301). Referred to the House 
     Calendar.
       Mr. LINDER: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 252. 
     Resolution providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 
     2546) making appropriations for the government of the 
     District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole 
     or in part against the revenues of said District for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes 
     (Rept. No. 104-302). Referred to the House Calendar.
```
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1147.html[7/22/2015 2:41:35 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-dykn

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1147

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I have a trusted financial advisor. Please leave my saving alone. I've worked very hard to save my money and

 plan to spend it how I choose.
#### Stephen S. Leake, Respondent, *v.*William Hartman, Appellant.

*Leake*v. Hartman, 137 App. Div. 451, affirmed.

(Argued May 29, 1911;

decided June 13, 1911.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 9, 1910, which affirmed an order of the Monroe County Court granting' a motion to strike the above-entitled action from the calendar for the trial of issues of fact with a jury and directing that the appeal herein on behalf of defendant appellant from' a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Rochester in favor of the plaintiff respondent be heard and determined as an issue of law.

The following questions were certified:

*“ 1.*Is the appellant deprived of his constitutional right to a trial by jury if he is not permitted to have a new trial by a jury of twelve men in the County Court ?

*“*2. Does section 31 of the Statutory Construction Law preserve to the appellant his right to a new trial in the County Court, notwithstanding the effect of chapter 754 of the Laws of 1907 ? ”

*Charles L. Pierce*for appellant.

*John W. Barrett*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Kruse, J., below. Both questions certified answered in the negative.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ.
§ 29.400 What funds may a Tribe elect to include in a funding agreement? A Tribe may elect to include in a funding agreement the following funds: ( a ) Funds provided to the Tribe under the Tribal Transportation Program identified in 23 U.S.C. 202 in accordance with the statutory formula set forth in 23 U.S.C. 202(b);
( b ) Any transit funds provided to the Tribe under 49 U.S.C. 5311;
( c ) Funds for any discretionary or competitive grant administered by the Department awarded to the Tribe for a transportation program under title 23 of the U.S. Code or chapter 53 of title 49 of the U.S. Code;
( d ) Funds for any other discretionary or competitive grant for a transportation-related purpose administered by the Department otherwise available to the Tribe;
( e ) Federal-aid funds apportioned to a State under chapter 1 of title 23 of the U.S. Code if the State elects to transfer, pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 207(d)(2)(A)(ii) or 23 U.S.C. 202(a)(9), a portion of such funds to the Tribe for an eligible project; and
( f ) Formula funds awarded to a State under 49 U.S.C. 5311 that the State elects to award to the Tribe, where the Tribe and State agree that the Department will award the funds directly to the Tribe.
-----Original Message----- 

From: ecallas@earthlink.net [mailto:ecallas@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:37 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

erica callas 

15446 Varden st. 

Sherman oaks, CA 91403
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.161 What does the MRO do when a drug test specimen is rejected for testing? As the MRO, when the laboratory reports that the specimen is rejected for testing (*e.g.,* because of a fatal or uncorrected flaw), you must do the following: ( a ) Place a check mark in the “Test Cancelled” box (Step 6) on Copy 2 (or a legible copy of Copy 3-5) of the CCF and enter the reason on the “Remarks” line. If you do not have Copy 2 (or a legible copy of Copy 3-5), then enter “Test Cancelled” and the reason for the cancellation on a report in the format required under § 40.163(c).
( b ) Report to the DER that the test is cancelled and the reason for cancellation, and that no further action is required unless a negative test is required (*e.g.,* in the case of a pre-employment, return-to-duty, or follow-up test).
( c ) You may only report a test cancelled because of a “rejected for testing” laboratory result when you are in possession of a legible copy of Copy 1 of the CCF. In addition, you must have Copy 2 of the CCF, a legible copy of it, or any other copy of the CCF containing the employee's signature. If you do not have Copy 2 (or a legible copy of Copy 3-5), then enter “Test Cancelled” and the reason for the cancellation on a report in the format required under § 40.163(c).
[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 88 FR 27646, May 2, 2023]
1210-AB32-2-1335.html[7/26/2015 1:50:00 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvx-9pr5

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1831

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Dennis Tavares

Address:

3060 29th Street, #5

Boulder, CO,

Email: TavaresDJUSA12@iCloud.Com

Phone: 3034441528

General Comment

*DITTO(USA)!!!!!

>

>

>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
of CNA Financial Corporation
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  
    
    the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed on
the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ D. Craig MenseD. Craig MenseChief Financial Officer
§ 511.25 Summary decision and order. ( a ) *Motion.* Any party may move, with a supporting memorandum, for a Summary Decision and Order in its favor upon all or any of the issues in controversy. Complaint Counsel may so move at any time after thirty (30) days following issuance of a complaint, and any other party may so move at any time after issuance of a complaint. Any such motion by any party shall be filed at least twenty (20) days before the date fixed for the adjudicatory hearing.
( b ) *Response to motion.* Any other party may, within ten (10) days after service of the motion, file a response thereto with a supporting memorandum.
( c ) *Grounds.* A Summary Decision and Order shall be granted if the pleadings and any testimony upon oral examination, answers to interrogatories, admissions, and/or affidavits show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a Summary Decision and Order as a matter of law.
( d ) *Legal effect.* A Summary Decision and Order upon all the issues being adjudicated shall constitute the Initial Decision of the Presiding Officer, and may be appealed to the Administrator in accordance with § 511.53. A Summary Decision, interlocutory in character, may be rendered on fewer than all issues and may not be appealed prior to issuance of the Initial Decision, except in accordance with § 511.24.
( e ) *Case not fully adjudicated on motion.* A Summary Decision and Order that does not dispose of the whole case shall include a statement of those material facts as to which there is no substantial controversy, and of those material facts that are actually and in good faith controverted. The Summary Order shall direct such further proceedings as are just.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 2

To inform the Senate that a quorum of the House has assembled and

of the election of the Speaker and the Clerk.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. ARMEY submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

To inform the Senate that a quorum of the House has

assembled and of the election of the Speaker and the Clerk.

1 Resolved, That the Senate be informed that a quorum

2 of the House of Representatives has assembled; that J.

3 Dennis Hastert, a Representative from the State of Illi4 nois, has been elected Speaker; and Jeffrey J. Trandahl,

5 a citizen of the State of South Dakota, has been elected

6 Clerk of the House of Representatives of the One Hundred

7 Seventh Congress.

Æ
§ 26.33 What steps must a recipient take to address overconcentration of DBEs in certain types of work? ( a ) If you determine that DBE firms are so overconcentrated in a certain type of work as to unduly burden the opportunity of non-DBE firms to participate in this type of work, you must devise appropriate measures to address this overconcentration.
( b ) These measures may include the use of incentives, technical assistance, business development programs, mentor-protégé programs, and other appropriate measures designed to assist DBEs in performing work outside of the specific field in which you have determined that non-DBEs are unduly burdened. You may also consider varying your use of contract goals, to the extent consistent with § 26.51, to unsure that non-DBEs are not unfairly prevented from competing for subcontracts.
( c ) You must obtain the approval of the concerned DOT operating administration for your determination of overconcentration and the measures you devise to address it. Once approved, the measures become part of your DBE program.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0569.html[7/20/2015 8:59:22 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-uh40

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0569

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

"Im smart enough to plan for my own retirement!"
1210-AB32-2-1334.html[7/26/2015 1:50:02 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvx-n950

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1830

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I am totally against this.
§ 372.207 Charleston, WV. The zone adjacent to, and commercially a part of Charleston, W. Va., within which transportation by motor vehicle in interstate or foreign commerce, not under common control, management, or arrangement for a continuous carriage or shipment to or from a point beyond such zone, is partially exempt from regulation under 49 U.S.C. 13506(b)(1) includes and is comprised of all points as follows: ( a ) The municipality of Charleston, W. Va., itself;
( b ) All points within a line drawn 6 miles beyond the municipal limits of Charleston;
( c ) Those points in Kanawha County, W. Va., which are not within the area described in paragraph (b) of this section; and those points in Putnam County, W. Va., south of West Virginia Highway 34;
( d ) All of any municipality any part of which is within the limits of the combined areas defined in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, and
( e ) All of any municipality wholly surrounded, or so surrounded except for a water boundary, by the municipality of Charleston or by any other municipality included under the terms of paragraph (d) of this section.
[41 FR 56653, Dec. 29, 1976, as amended at 62 FR 15422, Apr. 1, 1997]
###### Editorial Note on Part 385

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 385.1001 Applicability.

The requirements in this subpart apply to for-hire motor carriers registered or required to be registered under 49 U.S.C. 13902, 49 CFR part 365, and 49 CFR part 368.