alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 192

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 17, 2001.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2500) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and

related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30,

2002, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill

shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. Points of order against provisions in the bill for failure

to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived except as follows: beginning with ‘‘Provided’’ on page 19, line 13, through

‘‘workyears:’’ on line 19. Where points of order are waived
2

•HRES 192 EH

against part of a paragraph, points of order against a provision in another part of such paragraph may be made only

against such provision and not against the entire paragraph.

During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in

recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an

amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the

Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8

of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as

read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the

House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill

and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening

motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.211 Non-bulk packagings for solid hazardous materials in Packing Group I. ( a ) When § 172.101 of this subchapter specifies that a solid hazardous material be packaged under this section, only non-bulk packagings prescribed in this section may be used for its transportation. Each package must conform to the general packaging requirements of subpart B of part 173, to the requirements of part 178 of this subchapter at the Packing Group I performance level, and to the requirements of the special provisions of column 7 of the § 172.101 table.
( b ) The following combination packagings are authorized: *Outer packagings:* Steel drum: 1A1 or 1A2 Aluminum drum: 1B1 or 1B2 Metal drum other than steel or aluminum: 1N1 or 1N2 Plywood drum: 1D Fiber drum: 1G Plastic drum: 1H1 or 1H2 Wooden barrel: 2C2 Steel jerrican: 3A1 or 3A2 Plastic jerrican: 3H1 or 3H2 Aluminum jerrican: 3B1 or 3B2 Steel box: 4A Aluminum box: 4B Natural wood box: 4C1 or 4C2 Plywood box: 4D Reconstituted wood box: 4F Fiberboard box: 4G Solid plastic box: 4H2 Metal box other than steel or aluminum: 4N *Inner packagings:* Glass or earthenware receptacles Plastic receptacles Metal receptacles Glass ampoules
( c ) Except for transportation by passenger aircraft, the following single packagings are authorized:
Steel drum: 1A1 or 1A2 Aluminum drum: 1B1 or 1B2 Metal drum other than steel or aluminum: 1N1 or 1N2 Plastic drum: 1H1 or 1H2 Fiber drum: 1G Steel jerrican: 3A1 or 3A2 Plastic jerrican: 3H1 or 3H2 Aluminum jerrican: 3B1 or 3B2 Steel box with liner: 4A Aluminum box with liner: 4B Metal box other than steel or aluminum: 4N Natural wood box, sift proof: 4C2 Plastic receptacle in steel, aluminum, plywood, fiber or plastic drum: 6HA1, 6HB1, 6HD1, 6HG1 or 6HH1 Glass, porcelain or stoneware in steel, aluminum, plywood or fiber drum: 6PA1, 6PB1, 6PD1 or 6PG1 Glass, porcelain or stoneware in steel, aluminum, wooden or fiberboard box: 6PA2, 6PB2, 6PC or 6PG2 Glass, porcelain or stoneware in expanded or solid plastic packaging: 6PH1 or 6PH2 Cylinders, as prescribed for any compressed gas, except for Specification 8 and 3HT
[Amdt. 173-224, 55 FR 52643, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 66271, Dec. 20, 1991; 57 FR 45463, Oct. 1, 1992; Amdt. 173-241, 59 FR 67511, 67518, Dec. 29, 1994; Amdt. 173-261, 62 FR 24734, May 6, 1997; 69 FR 76157, Dec. 20, 2004; 78 FR 1089, Jan. 7, 2013]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-14-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,068,073
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    876,317
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,431,203
<PP&E>                                      62,649,265
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,213,581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,414,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,055,889
<BONDS>                                     22,990,658
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       362,501
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,005,637
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,414,683
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,149,489
<CGS>                                        8,162,873
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,709,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,357,683
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             430,707
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                633,266
<INCOME-TAX>                                   187,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            446,263
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (400,000)
<CHANGES>                                    (239,000)
<NET-INCOME>                                 (192,737)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

                    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in                     *United States*                     v.                     *Richard Reid, Lee Reid and Redesign' Landscape Contractors, Inc.*, Civ. No. 06-1103, was lodged with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on September 13, 2007. This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the United States against Richard Reid, Lee Reid and Redesign' Landscape Contractors, Inc., pursuant to Section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. 1311(a), to obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the Defendants for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants without a permit into waters of the United States. The proposed Consent Decree resolves these allegations by requiring the Defendants to a pay a civil penalty. The Defendants have restored the impacted area.                

                    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Donald R. Lorenzen, United States Attorney's Office, 219 South Dearborn Street, 5th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60604, and refer to                     *United States*                     v.                     *Richard Reid, Lee Reid and Redesign' Landscape Contractors, Inc.*, Civ. No. 06-1103.                

                    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Everett McKinley Dirksen Building, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed at                     *http://www.usdoj.gov/​enrd/​Consent_​Decrees.html*.                

Scott Schachter,

Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment & Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 07-4664 Filed 9-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, July 18, 1995 (96), Para 96.32 Senate Enrolled Bill Signed]
[Page 1151]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.96.32  senate enrolled bill signed

  The SPEAKER announced his signature to an enrolled bill of the Senate 
of the following title:

       S. 523. An Act to amend the Colorado River Basin Salinity 
     Control Act to authorize additional measures to carry out the 
     control of salinity upstream of Imperial Dam in a cost-
     effective manner, and for other purposes.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Somanetics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
I, William M. Iacona, Vice President, Finance, Controller, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         2.       the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  October 1, 2002            /s/ William M. Iacona
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   William M. Iacona, Vice President, Finance,
                                   Controller, Treasurer and Chief Financial
                                   Officer
Editorial Note on Part 393
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 393.203 Cab and body components. ( a ) The cab compartment doors or door parts used as an entrance or exits shall not be missing or broken. Doors shall not sag so that they cannot be properly opened or closed. No door shall be wired shut or otherwise secured in the closed position so that it cannot be readily opened. Exception: When the vehicle is loaded with pipe or bar stock that blocks the door and the cab has a roof exit.
( b ) Bolts or brackets securing the cab or the body of the vehicle to the frame shall not be loose, broken, or missing.
( c ) The hood must be securely fastened.
( d ) All seats must be securely mounted.
( e ) The front bumper must not be missing, loosely attached, or protruding beyond the confines of the vehicle so as to create a hazard.
[53 FR 49402, Dec. 7, 1988, as amended at 78 FR 58484, Sept. 24, 2013]
#### *The Hebrew Free School Association of the City of New York, *Respondent, v.*The Mayor, etc., of the City of New York, with others, *Appellants.*

*

 Decisions handed down November, 1883.

— Judgment affirmed on the authority of *Hebrew Free School Association*v. *Mayor*(4 Hun, 446).
A99A2269.

#### DUDLEY v. THE STATE.

(548 SE2d 414)

Decided March 20, 2001.

*Franklin H. Thornton,*for appellant.

Robert H. Dudley, *pro se.*

*Patrick J. McDonough, District Attorney, David N. Marple, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

Johnson, Presiding Judge.

The decision of the Court of Appeals in this case having been reversed by the Supreme Court, *Dudley v. State,*273 Ga. 466 (542 SE2d 99) (2001), our decision in *Dudley v. State,*242 Ga. App. 53 (527 SE2d 912) (2000), is hereby vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Phipps and Mikell, JJ., concur.*
-----Original Message----- 

From: l.mcmurtry@sbcglobal.net [mailto:l.mcmurtry@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 2:01 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lynn McMurtry 

8670 North Ave. 

St. Louis, MO 63114
Exhibit 32-5



Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United
States Code



The undersigned officer hereby certifies,
as to the Report on Form 10-K of PECO Energy Company for the year ended December 31, 2003, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained
in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PECO Energy Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 20, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN L. SKOLDS                          
|                        |  |  |  |                                                
|                        |  |  |  | John L. Skolds President Exelon Energy Delivery
1210-AB32-2-1405.html[7/26/2015 4:28:11 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jw3-1tgc

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1901

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anson Garcia

Address:

41111 N. Mill Dr

Magnolia, TX, 77354

Email: ansongarcia@gmail.com

Phone: 832-492-9359

General Comment

I can plan for my own retirement. I don't want the government who can't even pass a budget or can't manage its

 own money ($17 trillion in debt) touching any of my money or telling me what to do with it. Think about that a

 second. An entity in so much debt wants to mess with my retirement. That is completely ridiculous.
###### Editorial Note on Part 325

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 325 appear at 66 FR 49869, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 325.31 Scope of the rules in this subpart.

The rules in this subpart specify conditions and procedures for measurement of the sound level generated by a motor vehicle engaged in a highway operation for the purpose of ascertaining whether the motor vehicle conforms to the Standards for Highway Operations set forth in 40 CFR 202.20.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                2,631,916
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                         5,195,259
<ALLOWANCES>                           (72,606)
<INVENTORY>                           4,662,161
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     13,008,346
<PP&E>                               22,096,836
<DEPRECIATION>                      (9,341,241)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       34,838,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 2,787,539
<BONDS>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                              82,287
<OTHER-SE>                           25,956,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         34,838,233
<SALES>                              20,310,930
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     20,310,930
<CGS>                                 9,982,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         5,615,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    (1,079,183)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      242,716
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       5,549,249
<INCOME-TAX>                          1,973,216
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   3,576,033
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                          3,576,033
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.43
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 386
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 386 appear at 65 FR 7755, Feb. 16, 2000, and 88 FR 80182, Nov. 17, 2023.

§ 386.67 Judicial review. ( a ) Any party to the underlying proceeding, who, after an administrative adjudication, is adversely affected by a Final Agency Order issued under 49 U.S.C. 521 may, within 30 days of service of the Final Agency Order, petition for review of the order in the United States Court of Appeals in the circuit where the violation is alleged to have occurred, or where the violator has its principal place of business or residence, or in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
( b ) Judicial review will be based on a determination of whether the findings and conclusions in the Final Agency Order were supported by substantial evidence or were otherwise not in accordance with law. No objection that has not been raised before the Agency will be considered by the court, unless reasonable grounds existed for failure or neglect to do so. The commencement of proceedings under this section will not, unless ordered by the court, operate as a stay of the Final Agency Order of the Agency.
[70 FR 28485, May 18, 2005]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0759.html[7/21/2015 11:43:12 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-912a

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0759

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Mark Anonymous

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement and don't need the help of government!!!!
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 4:29 PM

To: 'ralphboddicker@gmail.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - Ralph J. Boddicker

Dear Mr. Boddicker:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2015

‐ 1119). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

* Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e.

‐ fixed

‐ wing,rotorcraft, lighter

‐ than

‐ air) for the proposed UAS

operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located

in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 6/29/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
H. Res. 184

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 28, 2001.

Resolved, That the following Member be, and is hereby,

elected to the following standing committees of the House of

Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Forbes.

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Forbes.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 236.381 Traffic locking.

Traffic locking shall be tested when placed in service and thereafter when modified, disarranged, or at least once every two years, whichever shall occur first.

[49 FR 3385, Jan. 26, 1984]
#### § 350.401 What is the High Priority Program and what entities are eligible for funding under the High Priority Program?

The High Priority Program is a competitive financial assistance program available to States, local governments, Federally-recognized Indian Tribes, other political jurisdictions, and other persons to carry out high priority activities and projects that augment motor carrier safety activities and projects. The High Priority Program also promotes the deployment and use of innovative technology by States for CMV information systems and networks. Under this program, the Administrator may make competitive grants to and enter into cooperative agreements with eligible entities to carry out high priority activities and projects that augment motor carrier safety activities and projects. The Administrator also may award grants to States for projects planned in accordance with the Innovative Technology Deployment Program.