alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0689 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: kristen harrington 

Address: 

28 Lafayette Avenue 

kingston, NY, 12401 

Email: kharrington@mindspring.com 

Phone: 845-383-1900 

Organization: Kingston Center for Integrative Healing 

General Comment 

I am very supportive of most of the provisions of the interim final rules under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008. These rules address many of 

the inequities in health insurance coverage of mental health care when compared to medical/surgical 

care that I have observed in the course of my mental health practice. 

However, in my opinion, two areas have not been sufficiently clarified. I am quite concerned that 

unless these points are more clearly specified in the final regulations, loopholes will remain that will 

permit widespread violation of the legislative intent of the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental 

Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008: 

1. In my opinion, the interim final rules do not define clearly enough the rules regulating the 

comprehensive scope of services parity between mental health/substance abuse services and 

medical/surgical services. Given the language of the Act and the positions already taken by the 

Departments in the interim final regulations, I request that the Final Rules clarify that benefits for 

MH/SUD must be comparable in scope to the benefits provided in medical/surgical care both across 

and within each classification. Unless parity in scope of services is required in the final regulations, 

the intent of the Act will not be achieved. 

2. I strongly support the application of parity requirements to both QTLs and NQTLs as being 

consistent with the Act and allowing for broad application of the parity requirement with regard to 

treatment limitations. However, in order to implement the intent of the Act, the regulations must 

specify more clearly that any NQTLs that are applied by plans must be comparable for MH/SUD and 

medical surgical benefits, and that any NQTLs for MH/SUD must be no more restrictive than NQTLs 

that are predominant across the broad range of medical/surgical benefits.Thank you, 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 03, 2010 

Received: May 03, 2010 

Status: DoNotPost 

Tracking No. 80ae5970 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 2

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 5/3/2010
Page 2 of 2

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 5/3/2010
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1382.html[7/23/2015 6:30:13 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvm-eoky

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1382

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Tonya VanGordon

General Comment

I live in the United States of America, the land of the free. Established by the people for the people. The people

 don't need your help planning for retirement. This proposed rule is yet another example of government

 overreach. I will not stand for this or for anyone who supports this new proprosed "rule". I'm ashamed of where

 this country is headed and will do what I can to fundamentally change this country back.
###### Editorial Note on Part 387

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 387 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 387.17 Violation and penalty.

Any person (except an employee who acts without knowledge) who knowingly violates the rules of this subpart shall be liable to the United States for a civil penalty as stated in part 386, appendix B, of this chapter, and if any such violation is a continuing one, each day of violation will constitute a separate offense. The amount of any such penalty shall be assessed by FMCSA's Administrator, by written notice. In determining the amount of such penalty, the Administrator, or his/her authorized delegate shall take into account the nature, circumstances, extent, the gravity of the violation committed and, with respect to the person found to have committed such violation, the degree of culpability, any history of prior violations, ability to pay, and any effect on ability to continue to do business, and such other matters as justice may require.

[80 FR 18158, Apr. 3, 2015]
**Exhibit 10.mm**

 

**Adopted pursuant to resolutions of theCinergy Corp. Benefits Committeeon December 18, 2002**

 

**AMENDMENT TO THECINERGY CORP. NONQUALIFIEDDEFERRED INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN**

 

The Cinergy Corp.Nonqualified Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended and restatedeffective as of December 1, 1996 (the “Plan”), is hereby amended effective asof January 1, 2002.

 

**(1)           Explanation of Amendment**

 

The Plan is amended topermit the Cinergy Corp. Benefits Committee to make certain exceptions to thegeneral rules relating to the timing requirements for making deferralelections.

 

**(2)           Amendment**

 

Section 3.2(b) of the Planis hereby amended by adding the following at the end thereof:

 

“Notwithstanding theforegoing, the Committee may permit a Deferral Agreement to be deliveredfollowing the first day of a Plan Year in circumstances where the Committeedetermines that it is appropriate and desirable.”

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CinergyCorp. has caused this Amendment to be executed and approved by its duly authorizedofficer on December 20, 2002.

 
|   | By:                             |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   | Timothy J. Verhagen             |
|   | Vice President  Human Resources |

 

1

----
```

[House Hearing, 105 Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

 
                 BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS OVERSIGHT:
                FIXING THE CONSUMER PRICE INDEX-PART II
______________________________________________________________

                                HEARING

                               BEFORE THE

                     SUBCOMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESOURCES

                                  OF THE

                         COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT 
 
                           REFORM AND OVERSIGHT

                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                       ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS

                             SECOND SESSION

                              ___________

                             APRIL 29, 1998

                              ___________

                          Serial No. 105-135

Printed for the use of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

                        U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

49-557                        WASHINGTON : 1998
_____________________________________________________________________
For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office 
Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, 
Washington, DC 20402
                       ISBN 0-16-057264-9

[NO TEXT AVAILABLE]

```
1210-AB32-2-1435.html[7/26/2015 5:04:35 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwc-iaw2

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1931

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Please do not touch or regulate how I use my own hard earned money for retirement. Government has no place in

 controlling people's money beyond taxes. I am smart enough to handle my own retirement the way I see fit and

 there is no way government can do a better job for millions of people not knowing individual circumstances. My

 401K is my property, not yours. 

Thank you.
Exhibit 32.2

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [SECTION]1350, as adopted pursuant to [SECTION]906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Union Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union
Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


/s/ Marsha Mongeon
_______________________
Marsha Mongeon
Chief Financial Officer


August 13, 2003


<PAGE>  33
1210-AB32-2-1112.html[7/24/2015 6:05:55 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-cngp

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1606

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: David Jones

General Comment

I want to manage my own retirement funds. I don't want the government to dictate, restrict, or regulate how I

 invest my money. I ask that the government allow me to decide for myself what I do with my money.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, October 19, 1995 (131), Para 131.10 Call in Committee]
[Page 1555]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.131.10  call in committee

  Mr. LINDER, Chairman, announced that the Committee, having had under 
consideration said bill, finding itself without a quorum, directed the 
Members to record their presence by electronic device, and the 
following-named Members responded--
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

#### § 40.215 What information about the DER do employers have to provide to BATs and STTs?

As an employer, you must provide to the STTs and BATs the name and telephone number of the appropriate DER (and C/TPA, where applicable) to contact about any problems or issues that may arise during the testing process.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 976

To authorize appropriations for the Individuals with Disabilities Education

Act to achieve full funding in fiscal year 2002 and fiscal year 2003,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 13, 2001

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to achieve full funding in fiscal year

2002 and fiscal year 2003, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘IDEA Keeping Our

5 Commitment Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 The Congress finds the following:

8 (1) In 1975, Congress passed the Education for

9 All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (enacted as
2

•HR 976 IH

1 Public Law 94–142), now known as the Individuals

2 with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et

3 seq.), which established a Federal commitment to

4 provide schools with 40 percent of the national aver5 age per pupil expenditure for the purpose of edu6 cating children with disabilities.

7 (2) To date, the Federal Government has never

8 contributed more than 14.9 percent of the maximum

9 State grant allocation for educating children with

10 disabilities under the Individuals with Disabilities

11 Education Act.

12 (3) The failure by the Federal Government to

13 fully fund the Individuals with Disabilities Edu14 cation Act has forced State and local governments to

15 divert funding from other worthy projects, including

16 school construction and hiring additional teachers, in

17 order to pay for the full costs of educating children

18 with disabilities.

19 (4) Each year, State and local educational

20 agencies are forced to spend precious resources to

21 simply comply with numerous reporting require22 ments called for under the Individuals with Disabil23 ities Education Act.

24 (5) Although Congress has increased Federal

25 funding for special education by 129 percent since
3

•HR 976 IH

1 1995, the failure by the Federal Government to fully

2 fund the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

3 constitutes a de facto unfunded Federal mandate on

4 the States.

5 SEC. 3. PURPOSE.

6 It is the purpose of this Act to reach the Federal Gov7 ernment’s goal of providing 40 percent of the national av8 erage per pupil expenditure for the purpose of educating

9 all children with disabilities in fiscal year 2002 and fiscal

10 year 2003.

11 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE IN12 DIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION

13 ACT.

14 Section 611(j) of the Individuals with Disabilities

15 Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1411(j)) is amended to read

16 as follows:

17 ‘‘(j) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—For the

18 purpose of carrying out this part, other than section 619,

19 there are authorized to be appropriated—

20 ‘‘(1) $17,700,000,000 for fiscal year 2002; and

21 ‘‘(2) $18,400,000,000 for fiscal year 2003.’’.

Æ
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue 

Fresno, California 93726 

(559) 230-5800 

www.valleyair.org

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue 

Fresno, California 93726 

(559) 230-5800 

www.valleyair.org

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue 

Fresno, California 93726 

(559) 230-5800 

www.valleyair.org
Exhibit 32-1



Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code



The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Report on Form 10-K of Exelon Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2006, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Exelon Corporation.



|                        |  |                                                
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: February 13, 2007 |  | /s/    JOHN W.
ROWE                            
|                        |  | John W. Rowe                                   
|                        |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President



409
#### § 37.55 Intercity rail station accessibility.

All intercity rail stations shall be made readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs, as soon as practicable, but in no event later than July 26, 2010. This requirement is separate from and in addition to requirements set forth in § 37.43 of this part.
#### Daniel Whipple, Respondent, v. William F. Smith, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs Opinion by

Bockes, J.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 5:37 PM

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyd-cfnn

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2170

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Rick Anonymous

General Comment

Dear Sirs :

I do NOT want the US-DOL to change the way I invest my savings,

or restrict in any way the financial vehicles I chose for my investments.

Please leave my IRA's alone. I do NOT need or want help in making

investment decisions.

Sincerely,

Rick
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1

                    
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JAN-3-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  Jun-28-1997
<CASH>                        1,078,166
<SECURITIES>                  1,302,635
<RECEIVABLES>                 2,644,391
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   4,475,188
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              10,713,187
<PP&E>                        13,462,774
<DEPRECIATION>                9,643,221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                14,707,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         2,691,939
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      1,304,780
<OTHER-SE>                    10,397,915
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  14,707,025
<SALES>                       9,261,443
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              9,261,443
<CGS>                         4,976,190
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 4,976,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               1,046,846
<INCOME-TAX>                  391,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  655,846
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .42
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1999 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             642
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      680
<ALLOWANCES>                                        85
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,323
<PP&E>                                           2,381
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              689
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,754
<OTHER-SE>                                    (44,455)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,012
<SALES>                                            496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,538
<CGS>                                              240
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  46
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (999)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (999)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (999)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
        3**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
        Kevin L. Cornwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              the
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
  
 /s/ Kevin L. Cornwell
 Kevin
        L.
        Cornwell
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 November
        3, 2006
 
 
 *A
        signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
        document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
        that
        appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
        has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.*