alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Civ. No. 2773.

Fourth Dist.

July 1, 1941.]

#### BERT SIMMONS, Appellant, v. DOROTHY SIMMONS, Respondent.

Barry Sullivan and Carl L. Elver for Appellant..

LeRoy N. French and Platt & Sinai for Respondent.

MARKS, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action for divorce which dismissed plaintiff’s action and decreed that the parties were not husband and wife because of a final decree of divorce rendered in the State of Nevada which was held to be “a good, valid, regular and legal decree”.

The only question raised by plaintiff, necessary for consideration, is the validity of the ruling on his unsuccessful attempt to dismiss his action prior to trial.

On May 2, 1940, plaintiff filed a written dismissal of his action with the clerk of the court. On the morning of May 3, 1940, when the case was called for trial, he called the attention of the trial judge to this dismissal and sought further dismissal by order of court which was denied him.

*698A plaintiff may not dismiss his action if the defendant has appeared and has sought affirmative relief either by answer or cross-complaint. (Sec. 581, Code Civ. Proc.; 9 Cal. Jur. 511, and cases cited.) Here, by a separate defense in her answer defendant set up the defense of the Nevada divorce decree and that because of that decree the parties were no longer husband and wife. She sought the affirmative relief of a decree of the trial court establishing the validity of the Nevada divorce. This issue was tried and the trial court determined it in favor of defendant.

As the answer of defendant sought affirmative relief there was no error in refusing plaintiff’s request to dismiss the action.

The determination of the other questions raised by defendant all rested within the sound discretion of the trial court. No abuse of discretion is shown.

The orders from which plaintiff has attempted to appeal are not appealable. (See. 963, Code Civ. Proc.)

The judgment is affirmed. The attempted appeal from the orders is dismissed.

Barnard, P. J., and Kelly, J., *pro tem.,*concurred.
EXHIBIT
23.1

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the Stock Option plan of Coastal Caribbean
Oils & Minerals, Ltd. of our report dated February 12, 2003, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Coastal Caribbean Oils &
Minerals, Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2002 included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

|                      |                      
|--------------------- | ---------------------
|                      | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|                      |                      
|Stamford, Connecticut |                      
|May 31, 2005          |                      

---
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 that to the best of her knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Union Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union Bankshares,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


/s/ Marsha A. Mongeon
---------------------
Marsha A. Mongeon
Chief Financial Officer

May 11, 2007
! "! # % & '( ) * + , - ./ 0 1 & 2 + 2 3 2 

41 5 66, 7 689: 6;8< =6>< % # 3 % ?@: %% , 6 A684

A, =B C<87 D><E ;, FE E6>9 E6, G E;8?
 ! "! # % & '( ) * + , - ./ 0 1 & 2 + 2 3 2 !

41 5 66, 7 689: 6;8< =6>< % # 3 % ?@: %% , 6 A684

A, =B C<87 D><E ;, FE E6>9 E6, G E;8?
 ! "! # % & '( ) * + , - ./ 0 1 & 2 + 2 3 2 "

41 5 66, 7 689: 6;8< =6>< % # 3 % ?@: %% , 6 A684

A, =B C<87 D><E ;, FE E6>9 E6, G E;8?
 ! "! # % & '( ) * + , - ./ 0 1 & 2 + 2 3 2 #

41 5 66, 7 689: 6;8< =6>< % # 3 % ?@: %% , 6 A684

A, =B C<87 D><E ;, FE E6>9 E6, G E;8?
 ! "! # % & '( ) * + , - ./ 0 1 & 2 + 2 3 2 $

41 5 66, 7 689: 6;8< =6>< % # 3 % ?@: %% , 6 A684

A, =B C<87 D><E ;, FE E6>9 E6, G E;8?
 ! "! # % & '( ) * + , - ./ 0 1 & 2 + 2 3 2 %

41 5 66, 7 689: 6;8< =6>< % # 3 % ?@: %% , 6 A684

A, =B C<87 D><E ;, FE E6>9 E6, G E;8?
 ! "! # % & '( ) * + , - ./ 0 1 & 2 + 2 3 2 &

41 5 66, 7 689: 6;8< =6>< % # 3 % ?@: %% , 6 A684

A, =B C<87 D><E ;, FE E6>9 E6, G E;8?
 ! "! # % & '( ) * + , - ./ 0 1 & 2 + 2 3 2 '

41 5 66, 7 689: 6;8< =6>< % # 3 % ?@: %% , 6 A684

A, =B C<87 D><E ;, FE E6>9 E6, G E;8?
 ! "! # % & '( ) * + , - ./ 0 1 & 2 + 2 3 2 (

41 5 66, 7 689: 6;8< =6>< % # 3 % ?@: %% , 6 A684

A, =B C<87 D><E ;, FE E6>9 E6, G E;8?
 ! "! # % & '( ) * + , - ./ 0 1 & 2 + 2 3 2 )

41 5 66, 7 689: 6;8< =6>< % # 3 % ?@: %% , 6 A684

A, =B C<87 D><E ;, FE E6>9 E6, G E;8?
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1529.html[7/23/2015 2:19:24 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-xv6c

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1529

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

To DOL Reps,

Please do not enact any restrictive legislation on all of us who will be collecting our own invested IRA and/or

 401k money distributions.We will be able and most capable of controling our own monies as we see fit and as

 we will need to use them.Thank You.

Tom
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 93 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 93

  To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that the mandatory 
  separation age for Federal firefighters be made the same as the age 
     that applies with respect to Federal law enforcement officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

 Mr. Gallegly (for himself, Mr. Horn, Mr. Condit, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. 
Kennedy of Rhode Island, and Mr. Berman) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that the mandatory 
  separation age for Federal firefighters be made the same as the age 
     that applies with respect to Federal law enforcement officers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Firefighters Retirement Age 
Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. MANDATORY SEPARATION AGE FOR FIREFIGHTERS.

    (a) Civil Service Retirement System.--
            (1) In general.--The second sentence of section 8335(b) of 
        title 5, United States Code, is amended--
                    (A) by inserting ``, firefighter,'' after ``law 
                enforcement officer''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, firefighter,'' after ``that 
                officer''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 8335(b) of title 5, 
        United States Code, is amended by striking the first sentence.
    (b) Federal Employees' Retirement System.--
            (1) In general.--The second sentence of section 8425(b) of 
        title 5, United States Code, is amended--
                    (A) by inserting ``, firefighter,'' after ``law 
                enforcement officer''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, firefighter,'' after ``that 
                officer''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 8425(b) of title 5, 
        United States Code, is amended by striking the first sentence.

                                 <all>
```
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyj-xnfj

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2196

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: John Doerre

Address: 

34 Cocoa Lane

Newburgh, NY, 12550-8818

Email: jdoerre7305@aol.com

Phone: 8455418377

General Comment

I am intelligent enough to manage my own investments without government intervention. When 

you get the debt under control and a balanced budget please contact me again to re-visit the 

issue.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 31, 1995 (137), Para 137.5 Communications]
[Page 1804]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.137.5  communications

  Executive and other communications, pursuant to clause 2, rule XXIV, 
were referred as follows:

       1574. A letter from the Comptroller General of the United 
     States, General Accounting Office, transmitting the list of 
     all reports issued or released in September 1995, pursuant to 
     31 U.S.C. 719(h); to the Committee on Government Reform and 
     Oversight.
       1575. A letter from the Administrator, General Services 
     Administration, transmitting the Administration's report on 
     cost savings for official travel by Federal employees, 
     pursuant to Public Law 103-355, section 6008(c) (108 Stat. 
     3367); to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight.
       1576. A letter from the President and CEO, Overseas Private 
     Investment Corporation, transmitting the seventh annual 
     report in compliance with the Inspector General Act 
     Amendments of 1988, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. app. (Insp. Gen. 
     Act) Sec. 5(b); to the Committee on Government Reform and 
     Oversight.
       1577. A letter from the Deputy Associate Director for 
     Compliance, Department of the Interior, transmitting 
     notification of proposed refunds of excess royalty payments 
     in OCS areas, pursuant to 43 U.S.C. 1339(b); to the Committee 
     on Resources.
       1578. A letter from the Secretary of Transportation, 
     transmitting the annual report on Transportation user fees, 
     fiscal year 1994, pursuant to 45 U.S.C. 447(e); to the 
     Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
       1579. A letter from the Secretary of Transportation, 
     transmitting the Department's biennial report entitled 
     ``Status of the Nation's Surface Transportation System: 
     Conditions and Performance Report,'' pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 
     308(e)(1); to the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure.
       1580. A letter from the Under Secretary of Defense, 
     transmitting notification of fund transfers authorized by 
     sections 9006, 8006, and 8005 of the Department of Defense 
     Appropriations Acts for fiscal year 1993, fiscal year 1994, 
     and fiscal year 1995, respectively, and sections 1001, 1101, 
     and 1001 of the Department of Defense Authorization Acts for 
     those same years; jointly, to the Committees on 
     Appropriations and National Security.
       1581. A letter from the Inspector General, Railroad 
     Retirement Board, transmitting the budget request for the 
     Office of Inspector General, Railroad Retirement Board, for 
     fiscal year 1997, pursuant to 45 U.S.C. 231f; jointly, to the 
     Committees on Appropriations, Ways and Means, and 
     Transportation and Infrastructure.
```
1210-AB32-2-1105.html[7/24/2015 5:52:35 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-u9ug

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1599

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Leave us alone already! Your hands are in our pockets too deep as it is!
See T EX . R. A PP . P . 52. 8( d) ( “ W hen deny i ng r el i ef , t he cour t m ay han d do w n an opi ni on b ut 1 i s n o t r e q u i re d to d o s o .”) ; T EX . R. A PP . P . 4 7 .4 (d i s ti n g u i s h i n g o p i n i o n s a n d m e m o ra n d u m o p i n i o n s ). 

### NU MBE R 13- 10- 0010 2-C V 

## CO UR T O F APP EAL S THI RTEENT H DI ST RI CT OF TE XAS CORPUS CHRI ST I - E DI NBURG IN RE: LEOPO LD O LE AL On P et i ti on fo r W ri t o f M an da m us . MEM ORA ND UM OPIN ION Before Justices Y añez, Ro dri guez, and Garza Per Cu ria m Mem ora ndum Opi nio n 1 Rel ator , Leo pol do Leal , fil ed a pro s e pet it ion for w ri t of mandamus i n the foreg oin g cause s on March 3, 20 10. W e de ny the petitio n for w rit of man dam us. It isthe re lat or's burden to prov ide thi s C our t w it h a s uff ic ien t pet it ion and re cord to est abl is h his ri g ht to mandamus rel ief. See gen erally T EX . R. A PP . P. 52. Spec ific all y , for ins tanc e, t he rela tor

mustfil e an appendi x

w it h the peti ti on for w ri t of mandamus , and the appendi x

musti ncl ude, int er

al ia, a c erti fied or

swor n c opy

of anyorder

complai ned of , or any other documentsh ow ing the matter co mplai ned of. See i

d. 52. 3(k). T he relat or mu st2

als o fil e a rec ord incl udi ng a “c erti fied or swor n copy of ev er y document t hat i s mat er ial to the relator's cla im fo r re lief and thatwas f iled in any unde rly ing proceed ing,” and “a p ro p e rly au th e n t i c a t e d t ra n s c r i p to f a n y re l e va n tt e s t i m o n y f ro m a n y u n d e r l yi n g p ro c e e d i n g, inc lud ing any

ex hib it s o ffered i n ev ide nce, or a s tatementthatno t est imony was adduc ed in conn ection w ith th e m a t t e r com plaine d.” See i d. 52.7( a) . Fur

ther , rela tor

mustfil e a cer ti ficat ion w it h the peti ti on for the p eti ti on for w ri t of m andamus sta ti ng thatev er y factual sta tement in the p eti ti on i s suppor ted bycompetent ev ide nce inc lud ed in the appendix or re cord. See i

d. 52.3( j) . Fi nal ly , t he pet it ion for w ri t of mandamus mustco ntai n a “ cl ear and conc is e arg ument for

the cont enti ons made, w it h appropr iat e cit ati ons to au thor it iesand to th e ap pen dix or record.” See i d. 52.3 (h). In t he i nst ant cas e, rela tor has fail ed to meet thes e req uirements and has thus fail ed to prov ide thi s C our

t w it h a peti ti on and re cord suff ic ien t to establ is h his ri g ht to mandamus re li ef. In fact, a t t he presentti me, th e C our t i s u nabl e to d isc e rn t h e nat ure of the re li ef soug ht by

rela tor. Acc ordin g ly , t he pet it ion for w ri t of mandamus i s D EN IED . See i d. 52. 8(a).
PERC UR IAM

Del iv ered and filed thi s 4 th da y

of Ma rc h, 20 10.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1235.html[7/22/2015 8:59:42 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-fsed

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1235

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Andrea Taylor

General Comment

I would like to urge you to stay out of the citizens future investments. It should be allowed for each individual to

 decide how to hedge themselves a retirement fund. The most the gov. should do is suggest good ways to invest.

 The government hasn't had good luck with investing our social security.. How can they tell us we must invest

 any certain way? Advise is good. All other should be suggestions only. Please leave it up to the individual

 families. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully yours,
§ 32.300 What must I do to comply with this part if I am an individual recipient? As a condition of receiving a(n) DOT award, if you are an individual recipient, you must agree that— ( a ) You will not engage in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance in conducting any activity related to the award; and
( b ) If you are convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any award activity, you will report the conviction: ( 1 ) In writing.
( 2 ) Within 10 calendar days of the conviction.
( 3 ) To the DOT awarding official or other designee for each award that you currently have, unless § 32.301 or the award document designates a central point for the receipt of the notices. When notice is made to a central point, it must include the identification number(s) of each affected award.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1096.html[7/22/2015 10:55:31 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-qks8

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1096

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Linda Prescott

General Comment

To Whom It May Concern:

You keep your hands off my money, and I'll keep my hands off of yours. Deal?
IV

House Calendar No. 36

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 153

[Report No. 107–85]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 1836) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 104

of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2002.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 2001

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution which; was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 1836) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 104 of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2002.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 1836) to provide for reconciliation

4 pursuant to section 104 of the concurrent resolution on

5 the budget for fiscal year 2002. All points of order against

6 the conference report and against its consideration are
2

HRES 153 RH

1 waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

2 The yeas and nays shall be considered as ordered on the

3 question of adoption of the conference report and on any

4 subsequent conference report or motion to dispose of an

5 amendment between the houses on H.R. 1836. Clause 5(b)

6 of rule XXI shall not apply to the bill, amendments there7 to, or conference reports thereon.

House Calendar No. 36

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 153

[Report No. 107–85]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1836) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 104 of

the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscalyear 2002.

MAY 25, 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Exhibit 32.2
                                                          ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THTE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of AmBase  Corporation  (the  "Issuer") on
Form 10-K for the period ending  December 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, John P. Ferrara,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: March 31, 2006

/s/ John P. Ferrara
-------------------
John P. Ferrara
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
AmBase Corporation
#### In the Matter of Sarah Moses and Betsey Moses.

—Order reversed, writ of *habeas*corpus' discharged, and the children remanded. Opinion

*Per Ouriam.*
1210-AB32-2-1480.html[7/26/2015 5:50:00 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwh-5uvq

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1976

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: JoAnn Moore

General Comment

Leave the 401K retirement plans alone. I do not want additional government intervention in my retirement plan.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1415.html[7/23/2015 9:42:01 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvn-u1p5

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1415

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Deanna Dickson

General Comment

I have planned my own retirement. The government should NOT be allowed to control how I elect to spend it.