T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T D A N I E L H . W E S T C O T T , J r ., P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. UN I T E D S T AT E S DE P AR T ME NT OF T H E IN T E R IO R , N at i on al P ark S ervi ce , D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 06- 35451 D . C . N o s . C V - 0 3 - 0 0 0 0 9 - J - J WS

C V - 0 3 - 0 0 0 1 0 - J WS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A l a s ka J ohn W . S e dw i c k, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d Jul y28, 2010 A nc hor a ge , A l a s ka B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , O ’ S C A N N L A IN an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P l a i nt i f f - A ppe l l a ntD a ni e l W e s t c ottappe a l s the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s e ntryof sum m ary j ud gm enti n favor of D ef endant -A pp el l ee N at i on alP ark S ervi ce (“N P S ”) i n W e s t c ott ’ s a c t i on unde rthe A dm i ni s tr a t i ve P r oc e dur e A c t( “ A P A ” ) c ha l l e ngi ng the N P S ’ s di s tr i but i on of f unds a s pa rtof

the G l a c i e rB a yC om m e r c i a l F i s hi ng



# FI LED AU G 17 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

C o m p e n s a tio n P r o g r a m . See P ub. L . N o. 106- 31, § 501( b) , 113 S t a t . 57, 72- 73 ( 1 9 9 9 ) ( c o d if

ie da t 1 6 U .S .C . § 4 1 0 h h - 4 n o te ) . W e s tc o tt c o n te n d s th a t h e s h o u ld ha ve r e c e i ve d ove r$256, 000 ba s e d on the or i gi na l e s t i m a t e s i n the c om pe ns a t i on pl an of the am ou ntof fund i ng t o b e a l l ocat ed t o D un geness cr ab cr ew m em bers , as d e te rm in e db ya n e s tim a te o f th e n u m b e ro f

c la im s th a t w o u ldb e s u b m itte din th is ca t egory. T he $1 5, 00 0 h e r ec ei ved repres ent ed hi s propo rt i on alshar e of the t ot al a m o u n t o f

f u n d s a llo c a te dto h is c a te g o rya f te ra ll c la im s h a db e e n s u b m itte d . I t in fa ctroug hl y e qu al ed the t ot al am ou nthe had earned i n the three se as on s he w orked o n h is p a r e n ts ’ D u n g e n e s s c r ab f is h in g b o a t. T he di stri ctcourtfoun d thatthe N P S ’ s r ea l l ocat i on of fund s di d n otre qu i re the S t a t e of

A l a s ka ’ s a ddi t i ona l c onc urr e nc e . T hi s f a c tua l f i ndi ng i s s upport e d by the r e c or d a nd i s notc l e a r l ye rr one ous . T he r e c or d i nde e d r e f l e c t s the S t a t e di d not obj e c tt o tha ta l l oc a t i on. T he N P S di d notvi ol a t e the A P A w he n i tr e a l l oc a t e d f unds w i thi n the c o m p e n s a tio n p la n w ith o u t f ir s t p r o v id in g n o tic e a n da n o p p o rtu n ityf o rp u b lic c om m e nt . T he r e w a s no s ubs t a nt i ve rul e m a ki ng r e qui r i ng s uc h pr oc e dur e s . T he a llo c a tio n o f

f u n d s w a s a n in te rp r e tiv e ru le . See 5 U .S .C . § 5 5 3 ( b ) ( 3 ) ( A ) ; R e noS p a rk s I n d i a n Co lo n

yv . EP A , 33 6 F . 3d 89 9, 90 9 (9th C i r. 20 03 ). AF F I RME D.