alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission. 

# Time and Date:

February 20, 2007 at 11 a.m. 

# Place:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# Status:

Open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered 

1. Agenda for future meetings: none. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. No. 731-TA-739 (Second Review)(Clad Steel Plate from Japan)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before March 1, 2007.) 

5. Inv. No. 731-TA-895 (Review)(Pure Magnesium from China)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before March 1, 2007.) 

6. Outstanding action jackets: none. 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

By order of the Commission.

Issued: January 29, 2007. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 07-462 Filed 1-30-07; 2:17 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–344 

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE FURTHER CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 3010, DEPARTMENTS OF LABOR, HEALTH 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, AND EDUCATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2006 

DECEMBER 13, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mrs. CAPITO, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 596] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 596, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the further conference report to accompany H.R. 3010, the Departments of Labor, 

Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies 

Appropriations Act, 2006, and against its consideration. The resolution also provides that the conference report shall be considered as 

read. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order is necessary because the conference report was filed with the House on the legislative day of 

Tuesday, December 13, 2005 and it may be considered by the 

House as early as the legislative day of Wednesday, December 14, 

2005, which would violate clause 8 of rule XXII (requiring a threeday layover of conference reports and the accompanying joint explanatory statement). 

The waiver of all points of order also includes a waiver of clause 

9 of rule XXII, which prohibits a conference report from including 

matter not committed to the conference committee by either House 

or a modification of specific matter committed to the conference 

committee if that modification is beyond the scope of the matter 

committed to the conference committee. 

Æ
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Robert A. Lindeman, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Max & Erma’s Restaurants,Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: March 27, 2008                                                     /s/ Robert A. Lindeman   Robert A. Lindeman   President and Chief Executive Officer ofMax & Erma’s Restaurants, Inc.  
24
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 267 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 85
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 267

                          [Report No. 107-247]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 2217) making appropriations for the Department of the 
Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
                     2002, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 16, 2001

 Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 2217) making appropriations for the Department of the 
Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
                     2002, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2217) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and 
related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived.

                                                  House Calendar No. 85

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 267

                          [Report No. 107-247]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 2217) making appropriations for the Department of the 
Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
                     2002, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 16, 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
#### § 511.56 Reconsideration.

Within twenty (20) days after issuance of a Final Decision and Order, any party may file with the Administrator a petition for reconsideration of such decision or order, setting forth the relief desired and the grounds in support thereof. Any party desiring to oppose such a petition shall file an answer thereto within ten (10) days after service of the petition. The filing of a petition for reconsideration shall not stay the effective date of the Decision and Order or toll the running of any statutory time period affecting the decision or order unless specifically so ordered by the Administrator.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.301 What is the SAP's function in the follow-up evaluation of an employee? ( a ) As a SAP, after you have prescribed assistance under § 40.293, you must re-evaluate the employee to determine if the employee has successfully carried out your education and/or treatment recommendations. ( 1 ) This is your way to gauge for the employer the employee's ability to demonstrate successful compliance with the education and/or treatment plan.
( 2 ) Your evaluation may serve as one of the reasons the employer decides to return the employee to safety-sensitive duty.
( b ) As the SAP making the follow-up evaluation determination, you must: ( 1 ) Confer with or obtain appropriate documentation from the appropriate education and/or treatment program professionals where the employee was referred; and
( 2 ) Conduct a clinical interview meeting the requirements of § 40.291(a)(1) with the employee to determine if the employee demonstrates successful compliance with your initial evaluation recommendations.
( c ) ( 1 ) If the employee has demonstrated successful compliance, you must provide a written report directly to the DER highlighting your clinical determination that the employee has done so with your initial evaluation recommendation (see § 40.311(d)).
( 2 ) You may determine that an employee has successfully demonstrated compliance even though the employee has not yet completed the full regimen of education and/or treatment you recommended or needs additional assistance. For example, if the employee has successfully completed the 30-day in-patient program you prescribed, you may make a “successful compliance” determination even though you conclude that the employee has not yet completed the out-patient counseling you recommended or should continue in an aftercare program.
( d ) ( 1 ) As the SAP, if you believe, as a result of the follow-up evaluation, that the employee has not demonstrated successful compliance with your recommendations, you must provide written notice directly to the DER (see § 40.311(e)).
( 2 ) As an employer who receives the SAP's written notice that the employee has not successfully complied with the SAP's recommendations, you must not return the employee to the performance of safety-sensitive duties.
( 3 ) As the SAP, you may conduct additional follow-up evaluation(s) if the employer determines that doing so is consistent with the employee's progress as you have reported it and with the employer's policy and/or labor-management agreements.
( 4 ) As the employer, following a SAP report that the employee has not demonstrated successful compliance, you may take personnel action consistent with your policy and/or labor-management agreements.
[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 88 FR 27650, May 2, 2023]
1210-AB32-2-1284.html[7/24/2015 10:21:16 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvu-oyb0

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1779

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Nancy Griffin

Address:

1 Durango Wy

Hot Springs Village, AR, 71909

Email: Ngriffin3813@icloud.com

Phone: 5019158284

General Comment

I can plan for my own retirement as I have forever since my retirement accumulation. Keep the government out

 of my business
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Annualperformance report [electronic resource].**** 
SuDocNumber:TD4.1/3:
ItemNumber:0431-A-7(online), 0431-A-61 (online)
CGPsystem Number:000584960
 
 
2004
2005
2006
2007
 **
1210-AB32-2-1448.html[7/26/2015 5:14:38 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwe-enl9

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1944

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jeff Gehbauer

Address:

Richmond, VA, 23236

Email: jeffgehbauer@gmail.com

General Comment

I understand that President Obama wants to meddle in my retirement plans and thus make it hard for me to retire!

 The Department of Labor(DOL) is starting to enact regulations that would restrict how I use my own money for

 my retirement planning. So now it has come to this - Mr. Obama and the Department of Labor now believes

 they have the authority to think for me since they believe this too is the responsibility of a nanny

 government/state and believes I 'm not smart enough to plan my own retirement. This is the epitome of the

 progressive nanny state mentality. 

Bottom line, the DOL and the Obama administration needs to stay out of meddling in my financial affairs as

 illustrated with the attempts to restrict.my retirement funding.
§ 375.801 What types of charges are subject to this subpart? This subpart applies to all shipments of household goods that: ( a ) Entail a balance due invoice; or
( b ) Are transported on an extension of credit basis.
[69 FR 10577, Mar. 5, 2004, as amended at 87 FR 24448, Apr. 26, 2022]
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.63 What steps does the collector take in the collection process before the employee provides a urine specimen? As the collector, you must take the following steps before the employee provides the urine specimen: ( a ) Ensure all items under Step 1 of the CCF are complete and accurate (*e.g.,* if Step 1.D is not checked, put a check mark for the “Specify DOT Agency” under the authority of which the test will take place; if the address where the collection is actually taking place is not in Step 1.G, update that.)
( b ) Instruct the employee to wash and dry his or her hands at this time. You must tell the employee not to wash his or her hands again until after delivering the specimen to you. You must not give the employee any further access to water or other materials that could be used to adulterate or dilute a specimen.
( c ) Select, or allow the employee to select, an individually wrapped or sealed collection container from collection kit materials. Either you or the employee, with both of you present, must unwrap or break the seal of the collection container. You must not unwrap or break the seal on any specimen bottle at this time. You must not allow the employee to take anything from the collection kit into the room used for urination except the collection container.
( d ) Direct the employee to go into the room used for urination, provide a specimen of at least 45 mL, not flush the toilet, and return to you with the specimen as soon as the employee has completed the void. ( 1 ) Except in the case of an observed or a monitored collection (see §§ 40.67 and 40.69), neither you nor anyone else may go into the room with the employee.
( 2 ) As the collector, you may set a reasonable time limit for voiding.
( e ) You must pay careful attention to the employee during the entire collection process to note any conduct that clearly indicates an attempt to tamper with a specimen (*e.g.,* substitute urine in plain view or an attempt to bring into the collection site an adulterant or urine substitute). If you detect such conduct, you must require that a collection take place immediately under direct observation (*see* § 40.67) and complete Step 2 by noting the conduct in the “Remarks” line of the CCF and the fact that the collection was observed by checking the “Observed” box. You must also, as soon as possible, inform the DER and collection site supervisor that a collection took place under direct observation and the reason for doing so.
[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 75 FR 59107, Sept. 27, 2010; 88 FR 27641, May 2, 2023]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, November 7, 1995 (141), Para 141.27 H.J. Res. 112--Unfinished Business]
[Page 1878]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.141.27  h.j. res. 112--unfinished business

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced the further unfinished business to be the motion to suspend 
the rules and pass the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 112) providing for 
the appointment of Louis Gerstner as a citizen regent of the Board of 
Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
  The question being put,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said joint resolution?
  The vote was taken by electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

390

affirmative

Nays

0
```
Editorial Note on Part 393
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 393.132 What are the rules for securing flattened or crushed vehicles? ( a ) *Applicability.* The rules in this section apply to the transportation of vehicles such as automobiles, light trucks, and vans that have been flattened or crushed.
( b ) *Prohibition on the use of synthetic webbing.* The use of synthetic webbing to secure flattened or crushed vehicles is prohibited except that such webbing may be used to connect wire rope or chain to anchor points on the commercial motor vehicle. However, the webbing (regardless of whether edge protection is used) must not come into contact with the flattened or crushed cars.
( c ) *Securement of flattened or crushed vehicles.* Flattened or crushed vehicles must be transported on vehicles which have: ( 1 ) Containment walls or comparable means on four sides which extend to the full height of the load and which block against movement of the cargo in the forward, rearward and lateral directions; or
( 2 ) ( i ) Containment walls or comparable means on three sides which extend to the full height of the load and which block against movement of the cargo in the direction for which there is a containment wall or comparable means, and
( ii ) A minimum of two tiedowns are required per vehicle stack; or
( 3 ) ( i ) Containment walls on two sides which extend to the full height of the load and which block against movement of the cargo in the forward and rearward directions, and
( ii ) A minimum of three tiedowns are required per vehicle stack; or
( 4 ) A minimum of four tiedowns per vehicle stack.
( 5 ) In addition to the requirements of paragraphs (c)(2), (3), and (4), the following rules must be satisfied: ( i ) Vehicles used to transport flattened or crushed vehicles must be equipped with a means to prevent liquids from leaking from the bottom of the vehicle, and loose parts from falling from the bottom and all four sides of the vehicle extending to the full height of the cargo.
( ii ) The means used to contain loose parts may consist of structural walls, sides or sideboards, or suitable covering material, alone or in combinations.
( iii ) The use of synthetic material for containment of loose parts is permitted.
[67 FR 61225, Sept. 27, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 35834, June 22, 2006]
SUPREME COURT.

#### Townsend B. Baldwin agt. William H. Briggs.

*Counter-claim—when cannot he set up.*

Where one defendant is sued upon an individual liability, he cannot set up as a counter-claim a claim which he holds jointly with another against the plaintiff.

*Special Term, February,*1874.

Van Brunt, *J.*

It seems to me that the demurrer in this action must be sustained. There are many cases which decide that in a suit against two or more persons or partners a several claim in favor of one defendant only cannot be enforced as a counter-claim *(Hurlburt*agt. *Post,*1 *Bosw.,*28; *Peabody*agt. *Bloomer,*3 *Abb. Pr.,*353; 6 *Duer,*53; *Mott*agt. *Burnett,*2 *E. D. Smith,*50). I can see no reason why the converse of the proposition should not be equally true, viz., that where one defendant is sued upon an individual liability he cannot set up as a counter-claim a claim which he holds jointly with another against the plaintiff. The cause of action constituting the counter-claim must be one existing in favor of a defendant against a plaintiff, between whom a several judgment might be had in the action *(Sec.*150 *of the Code).*The cause of action set up as a counter-claim in the action does not exist in favor of the defendant and his copartner against the plaintiff, and this does not comply with the requirements of the section. Furthermore, in litigating a claim either made by a firm or against a firm, the opposite party has a right to have all the members of that firm before the court. The demurrer must be sustained, with leave to the defendant to amend his answer, upon payment of costs, if he be so advised.