alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 27.125 Compliance procedure. ( a ) *General.* If there is reasonable cause for the responsible Departmental official to believe that there is a failure to comply with any provision of this part that cannot be corrected by informal means, the responsible Departmental official may recommend suspension or termination of, or refusal to grant or to continue Federal financial assistance, or take any other steps authorized by law. Such other steps may include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) A referral to the Department of Justice with a recommendation that appropriate proceedings be brought to enforce any rights of the United States under any law of the United States (including other titles of the Act), or any assurance or other contractural undertaking; and
( 2 ) Any applicable proceeding under State or local law.
( b ) *Refusal of Federal financial assistance.* ( 1 ) No order suspending, terminating, or refusing to grant or continue Federal financial assistance becomes effective until: ( i ) The responsible Departmental official has advised the applicant or recipient of its failure to comply and has determined that compliance cannot be secured by voluntary means; and
( ii ) There has been an express finding by the Secretary on the record, after opportunity for hearing, of a failure by the applicant or recipient to comply with a requirement imposed by or pursuant to this part.
( 2 ) Any action to suspend, terminate, or refuse to grant or to continue Federal financial assistance is limited to the particular recipient who has failed to comply, and is limited in its effect to the particular program or activity, or part thereof, in which noncompliance has been found.
( c ) *Other means authorized by law.* No other action is taken until: ( 1 ) The responsible Departmental official has determined that compliance cannot be secured by voluntary means;
( 2 ) The recipient or other person has been notified by the responsible Departmental official of its failure to comply and of the proposed action;
( 3 ) The expiration of at least 10 days from the mailing of such notice to the recipient or other person. During this period, additional efforts are made to persuade the recipient or other person to comply with the regulations and to take such corrective action as may be appropriate.
[44 FR 31468, May 31, 1979. Redesignated at 56 FR 45621, Sept. 6, 1991. 68 FR 51391, Aug. 26, 2003]
§ 390.123 Medical examiner certification for qualified Department of Veterans Affairs examiners. ( a ) For a qualified VA examiner to receive medical examiner certification from FMCSA under §§ 390.123 through 390.135, a person must: ( 1 ) Be an advanced practice nurse, doctor of chiropractic, doctor of medicine, doctor of osteopathy, physician assistant, or other medical professional employed in the Department of Veterans Affairs;
( 2 ) Be licensed, certified, or registered in a State to perform physical examinations;
( 3 ) Register on the National Registry website and receive a National Registry number before taking the training that meets the requirements of § 390.125;
( 4 ) Be familiar with FMCSA's standards for, and physical requirements of, a commercial motor vehicle operator requiring medical certification, by completing the training program that meets the requirements of § 390.125;
( 5 ) Pass the medical examiner certification test provided by FMCSA, administered in accordance with § 390.127, and has had his or her test information forwarded to FMCSA; and
( 6 ) Never have been found to have acted fraudulently with respect to any certification of a commercial motor vehicle operator, including by fraudulently awarding a medical certificate.
( b ) If a person becomes a certified VA medical examiner under §§ 390.123 through 390.135, then to renew such certification the certified VA medical examiner must remain qualified under paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section and complete additional testing and training as required by § 390.131(a)(5).
### SERVED: SEPTEMBER 24, 2012



### ...., ..**·~···,\f1T1** 

### lrc··NT OF

,,.. ,,,lh+ / .... . ...•:.J l"l. \, rw.. j 

### · ,**:~:/J** 

### ..

### JSPORTATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF**TRANSPORTATION.·~,** :;(Cf**t)pr:n,~-fjQI•IS** OFFICE OF HEARINGS ... ·.' L, L Ln,·l .**'~ ,.~** 

WASIDNGTON, DC IN THE MATTER OF JOHN CROFT FAA DOCKET NO .. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0903 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING

. This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011NM730130) has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings**~nd** other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons o.n the attached Service List.

Attachment- Service List
101.02.06 13:36 B C:\permftp\lps6616\volume I.pdf --> permanent.access.gpo.gov /diska/netsite-docs/lps6616 volume I.pdf
101.02.06 14:56 B C:\permftp\lps6616\volume I.pdf --> permanent.access.gpo.gov /diska/netsite-docs/lps6616 volume I.pdf
Change to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 4(e)(ii) 
  
 [OCÈ-USA HOLDING, INC. LETTERHEAD] 
  
 April 22, 2003 
  
 Mr. R.E. Daly 
 1418 South Prairie 
 CHICAGO 
 Illinois 60605 
 USA 
  

	Re:	RRD phantom share units; change to employment agreement. 

  
 Dear Mr. Daly, 
  
 Upon your transfer from R.R. Donnelley Company to Océ-USA Holding, Inc. (hereinafter “Océ”) we granted to you a number of 90,000 phantom share units in R.R. Donnelley Company as part of your
equalisation package. The terms and conditions of these phantom share units are described in clause 1.05b of your employment agreement with Océ. 
  
 This is to confirm our agreement to delete the arrangement with the R.R. Donnelley phantom share units from your employment agreement and grant you Océ phantom
share units under the Océ-USA Inc. Equity Team Stock Appreciation Plan (see enclosure). The conditions for the Océ phantom share units will be as follows: 
  

	–	Number of Océ-USA Inc. phantom share units: 90,000 


	–	Fair Market Value on the Grant Date: the closing price of the Océ shares on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange on the Grant Date, being EURO 11.45. 


	–	Grant Date: December 1, 2002. 


	–	Exercise period of five years, so no entitlement to the Océ phantom share units shall exist after December 1, 2007. All units vest on the Grant Date.



	–	The Océ-USA phantom share units are granted pursuant to the terms of the Océ-USA Inc. Equity Team Stock Appreciation Plan. Details and documentation will be arranged
by the VP Human Resources of Océ-USA Holding Inc. In case of differences between the Océ-USA Inc. Equity Team Stock Appreciation Plan and the terms of this letter agreement, this letter agreement shall prevail.



	–	Clause 1.05b of your employment agreement with Océ will lapse with immediate effect. 

  
 Would you please sign one copy of this letter and return it to undersigned. 
  
 Kind regards, 
  

	
	Océ-USA Holding, Inc.
	
	/s/    R. van Iperen        
	

	 R. van Iperen
 Chairman of the Board of Directors


  

							
				
	Agreed and accepted:	 	 Date:
	 	 	 	 
				
	  	 	 R. Daly
	 	/s/    R. Daly        	 	  
	 	 	 	 	
	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

  
 Enclosure: Océ-USA Inc. Equity Team Stock Appreciation Plan
From: Gina Waite [mailto:gina.waite@tfaconnect.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 12:51 PM

Subject: Advance an Alternative to the DOL Fiduciary Proposal

As your constituent and a licensed financial professional, I am very much opposed to the 

proposed rule from the Department of Labor. This proposal would have an immensely harmful 

impact on Americans saving for retirement. I am requesting that you oppose the rule in its 

present form since the DOL seems determined to move forward with the proposal without any 

serious regard for the objections raised by consumers, providers, and industry representatives. 

Hardworking Americans� retirement futures are at risk. While I support a best interest standard 

for all financial professionals, the rule as proposed is not workable and would have numerous 

unintended consequences for American workers and retirement savers, particularly those who are 

middle-class. The requirements in the rule would: � Force middle-class savers into low-service, 

do-it-yourself accounts. � Deprive average savers of meaningful, personalized planning advice. 

� Limit the scope of products and services available for retirement planning. � Severely reduce 

the availability of workplace retirement plans for small-businesses. � Prevent workers from 

accessing help from financial professionals when leaving their jobs, especially regarding the 

ability to rollover funds into lifetime income guaranty solutions. � Block plan providers from 

effectively and efficiently providing guidance and education to participants regarding their 

investment and retirement planning options. For these reasons, again, I urge you to intervene and 

advance a legislative alternative to ensure the DOL rule does not harm American savers. Help us 

to create a Best Interest Standard that works in favor of every day Americans, not against them. I 

grew up in the middle-class and I work with the middle-class. I have stopped several people 

understand the consequences of cashing out their 401k plan and helped them preserve it for their 

future needs instead of immediate needs. I recently helped a 70 year old female client retire I met 

her working at Walmart in Loveland, CO back in 2007. She had been laid off from HP in 2005 I 

was able to help her protect a portion of her assets inside a VA with a guaranteed income stream 

that helped protect that bucket of money when 2008 market crash happened. Thank you for your 

consideration. Sincerely, Gina Waite Transamerica Financial Group 1585 Millfleet Drive 

Windsor, CO 80550
#### § 29.5 Who is responsible for carrying out the functions connected with the Program?

The Department will carry out the Program, including making eligibility determinations; negotiating compacts and funding agreements with Tribes; overseeing compliance with Department requirements; and otherwise administering and implementing the Program consistent with this part. As provided in § 29.402, a Tribe is responsible for day-to-day management of the Tribe's PSFAs consistent with the compact and funding agreement.
11K coats, blankets help Kyrgyz citizens stay 'Warm and Dry'
 By Staff Sgt. Angela Ruiz , 376th Air Expeditionary Wing
  11K coats, blankets help Kyrgyz citizens stay 'Warm and Dry'
 TRANSIT CENTER AT MANAS, Kyrgyzstan (March 24, 2012) — Over the course of three months, 311 service members here volunteered to support Operation Warm and Dry by distributing 11,789 coats and blankets to people in need across Kyrgyzstan. When Operation Warm and Dry started in 2009, it was a small volunteer project where Airmen at the Transit Center donated from their own pockets. Today it has grown into much more.Many organizations came together this year to support Operation Warm and Dry. The U.S. Embassy and Kyrgyz Republic government gave the Transit Center approval to execute the project. U.S. Central Command approved the Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster and Civic Aid request to fund the project with $300,000. U.S. Peace Corps volunteers and the Kyrgyz Ministry of Social Protection Workers advised and guided the Transit Center’s Theater Security Cooperation division to where needs were the greatest. “This size of an operation doesn’t happen by one person. It’s a total team effort.” said Capt. Steve Martin, previous humanitarian assistant project officer stationed at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Ariz. There were seven phases of this year’s Operation Warm and Dry covering five regions at 69 different locations including schools, hospitals and orphanages. All 11,789 coats and blankets were purchased from 25 local Kyrgyz Republic vendors in an effort to support the local economy. Volunteers traveled more than 6,000 miles total to deliver the new coats and blankets. On each trip Kyrgyz contractors were hired to transport the volunteers from the Transit Center to the distribution locations. The furthest distribution location was Jalal-Abad a two-day road-trip though mountainous terrain. “To be able to go there and reach out to people the Transit Center has never interacted with before, makes me feel like we’re making an impact,” said Capt. Spencer Bowen, Theater Security Cooperation division humanitarian assistance project officer deployed from the University of Washington. The 800 coats and blankets distributed in Jalal-Abad were manufactured by two non-profit organizations in Osh which employ blind and deaf citizens. Transit Center service members dedicated more than 4,000 hours during Operation Warm and Dry. “I thought it would be a really good thing to do,” said Staff Sgt. Thomas Adkinson, 376th Expeditionary Force Support Squadron personnel support for contingency operations representative. “It just seemed like something genuinely meant to help people, and I wanted to be a part of that.” Adkinson is deployed here from Vance Air Force Base, Okla., volunteered for the Balykchy distribution. More than 1,200 coats and blankets were given out in Balykchy. Operation Warm and Dry began with a few Airmen hopeful to make a difference. Three years later, their small project blossomed to its full potential.
#### § 392.8 Emergency equipment, inspection and use.

No commercial motor vehicle shall be driven unless the driver thereof is satisfied that the emergency equipment required by § 393.95 of this subchapter is in place and ready for use; nor shall any driver fail to use or make use of such equipment when and as needed.

[49 FR 38290, Sept. 28, 1984, as amended at 60 FR 38746, July 28, 1995]
1210-AB32-2-1626.html[7/26/2015 9:11:10 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxz-mlrg

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2123

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Gloria Cruz

General Comment

I can make my own decisions on what I do for investing for retirement. This country was founded on principles

 of freedom of choice for all Americans, and I have the right to exercise that freedom of choice.
§ 520.29 Internal review of final environmental impact statements. ( a ) Upon completion of the review for legal sufficiency of the FEIS, the Chief Counsel shall transmit 2 copies of the FEIS to TES for concurrence. Unless other notification is provided within 2 weeks after receipt in TES, the statement will be considered concurred in by TES.
( b ) After concurrence by TES, the FEIS will be transmitted by the Chief Counsel to the Administrator for approval.
( c ) If an action requires the personal approval of the Secretary or Deputy Secretary pursuant to a request by them or by TES, TGC, or the NHTSA office originating the action, the final environmental statement shall be accompanied by a brief cover memorandum requesting the Secretary's or Deputy Secretary's approval of the action. ( 1 ) The memorandum shall have signature lines for the concurrence of the Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety, and Consumer Affairs, the General Counsel, and the Deputy Secretary, and for the approval of the Secretary or Deputy Secretary.
( 2 ) TES, in conjunction with the Executive Secretary, is responsible for informing the Assistant Secretary for Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs and the Office of Public Affairs of the Secretary's decisions so that they, in coordination with the operating administrations or other Secretarial Offices involved, may take the appropriate actions.
§ 392.16 Use of seat belts. ( a ) *Drivers.* No driver shall operate a commercial motor vehicle, and a motor carrier shall not require or permit a driver to operate a commercial motor vehicle, that has a seat belt assembly installed at the driver's seat unless the driver is properly restrained by the seat belt assembly.
( b ) *Passengers.* No driver shall operate a property-carrying commercial motor vehicle, and a motor carrier shall not require or permit a driver to operate a property-carrying commercial motor vehicle, that has seat belt assemblies installed at the seats for other occupants of the vehicle unless all other occupants are properly restrained by such seat belt assemblies.
[81 FR 36479, June 7, 2016; 81 FR 43957, July 6, 2016]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0938.html[7/21/2015 6:34:30 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-s6gr

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0938

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Robert Clocker

General Comment

Hads off my 401K & I.R.A. !!
```

[House Document 106-287]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                    

106th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 106-287

 
NOTIFICATION OF ADDITION OF NIGERIA TO THE LIST OF COUNTRIES UNDER THE 
                GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF PREFERENCES (GSP)

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

NOTIFICATION OF HIS INTENTION TO ADD NIGERIA TO THE LIST OF BENEFICIARY 
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES UNDER THE GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF PREFERENCES (GSP), 
       PURSUANT TO PUB. L. 104-188, SEC. 1952(a) (110 STAT. 1917)

  September 6, 2000.--Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means and 
                         ordered to be printed

                                           The White House,
                                       Washington, August 24, 2000.

Hon. J. Dennis Hastert,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.

    Dear Mr. Speaker: I am writing to inform you of my intent 
to add Nigeria to the list of beneficiary developing countries 
under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP). The GSP 
program, which offers duty-free access to the U.S. market, was 
originally authorized by the Trade Act of 1974.
    I have carefully considered the criteria identified in 
sections 501 and 502 of the Trade Act of 1974. In light of 
these criteria, I have determined that it is appropriate to 
extend GSP benefits to Nigeria.
    This notice is submitted in accordance with section 
502(f)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974.
            Sincerely,
                                                William J. Clinton.

                                

```
82 

’ f 

I 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable nava ~~:axelll, Jr. 

calm ty Attorn4~ 

Rhal by County 

Canter, fasa8 

near Mr. wc.*ellls bplnlon No. O-7424 

Your letter requ4atlnF: on opjnlon u 

titled mbjoot is 84 folloWsa 

‘Cnn an officer Of 

clerk in ths 

eeaeed wife 

Penn1 Codo defining ‘Ropotie’ in 

. 

or of thj4 State or 8nv offiaer et 

prealnat, 4ahool diaof thlm 

state, or any otfie4r or renher Of 8ny Ptate, 

di4trfct. ceant7* 8itfr mchool dj strjat Or 4tLOP 

~mjclpal .boord, or fudge of my court, oreatod 

by or under 4athority Of 8nJ pen4r41 Or sp40141 

law of’ thje State, or 8ny member Of the togidature, Hall 8pJ;Oint, or rote for, or confiirm t.he 

apyv-tl~trwv-,t to 8ny offiC0, pOoitiOn, elerkahlp, 

employvant or dutJ, of’ any rerwn related ~1 tb- 
83 

.Iloarnble D8T4 MOReill, Jr. - p8ge 8 

ln WIG second dGlgr4G by 8tttiitJ or w9 thin the 

third do((r44 by cGnaangt?!nity t0 the psrson 8~ 

8ppOinting or 90 voting, or to any OthGr mabsr 

Of a ny l uGh board, the t4gial8tuT4~ or aaurt of 

4hlGh spoh perem mo 8pp4ia ting or TGting ~47 be 

8 PGmbBr, rbQ the Ul8rJr f4Osr or OOmpsns4t~,Gn 

of woh appojntee 34 to he paid for, dlreetly or 

hdiroatly, out of Ot from publie funds or t8os 

Of OttiGG Of 487 kind Or GhEt84t4r WhGtsOG+Ot.’ 

From yOar et8t4tmOnt To t8k4 it. tn PO that the ptep@ed 

0mpl0~00 18 aOt related t0 the OWplO7ing Gffioer b7 blond ln m, 

ray wb8t4oorsr, 8nd eapeoial1y that h4 18 not tOt8t8d to tbo (E 

ploylag otfioer Tithin the third de&ros blood r418tlm. It pbmnin8 anly to be aeon Ghethrr or not ho la rGl8ted tn the nplo7- 

in9 OfflOor by 8ffhf ty Tifbin the noeand demo40 Under the eomman 18~~ which thjs Rtrte 8dopted 8s thr rule Gf deelsim April 

1, 1840, the blood relotlren of the wife ore POl8t4d to the h8- 

hand by 8f’tSnit~. Tho84 rel8tod t0 th4 wife by affinity Only 8r4 

not 8t all related to the hu4bandt but an above 8t8t8dt i.he hamhand’s kin by ati’lnity throngh hi8 arrrrir@e inaludos anly those 

perwno who are related by aongan&u;unity - blood - to the 8lf4. 

Under t~hs plain lGtt8r Of the Cods, t0 ho inelIg3hlo 

fur 8ppoitttmGnt by tha ComtJ OfflOOr , the emplo7~ in your oam 

must bo rol8tGd to the hu8band-4mplO~Or within the 8OCGnd degree 

of nffinlty. Under your 8kt4Wnt he 18 not thU8 t418t4de 8nd 

18 thornfore allgible to tbo 4pp4i~~4nt. 

VQ find thorn 10 m4 dogtO by eon8angtdnit7 or blood 

botwean the wife of the offi8ar Pnd her f8thOPa Thor0 18 0184 

8 blood r418tiOn Qt One degrso h8tW443 her fat-her 8Rd her 8T,,,t, ., 

who is a b8lf-8~8tOr Of hot f8ther , thus reachin? the two 64- 

Free8 blood rel8tion iie44848rl to 4rOludO the emplo~eo, 8nd the 

two dsgreon do not 5nolud4 ths hamband. 

Out opinion NC. O-2826, Of d8tO July 3, 1840, IS overrul Gd# 8nd our opintonG X08* O-119, O-W34 awl O-1096 thorelm 

orerml8d 8r4 r8rtorod in all nsp4Ots WhereIn they 8ro In 80- 

card wltb thl4 opinion.
§ 511.21 Prehearing conferences. ( a ) *When held.* ( 1 ) A prehearing conference shall be held in person or by conference telephone call, except in unusual circumstances, approximately fifty (50) days after publication in the Federal Register of the complaint, upon ten (10) days notice to all parties and participants, to consider any or all the following: ( i ) Motions for consolidation of proceedings;
( ii ) Identification, simplification and clarification of the issues;
( iii ) Necessity or desirability of amending the pleadings;
( iv ) Stipulations and admissions of fact and of the content and authenticity of documents;
( v ) Oppositions to notices of oral examination;
( vi ) Motions for protective orders to limit or modify discovery;
( vii ) Issuance of subpoenas to compel the appearance of witnesses and the production of documents;
( viii ) Limitation of the number of witnesses, particularly the avoidance of duplicate expert witnesses;
( ix ) Matters of which official notice will be taken and matters which may be resolved by reliance upon findings of other Federal agencies; and
( x ) Other matters which may expedite the conduct of the hearing.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 10, 2024

NO. 03-23-00786-CV

Sarah Kuhl, Appellant

v.

Rettie Leibowitz, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES SMITH AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on November 6, 2023. Having 

reviewed the record, the Court holds that Sarah Kuhl has not prosecuted her appeal and did not 

comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for 

want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of 

costs is made.