alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, October 30, 1995 (136), Para 136.27 Adjournment]
[Page 1803]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.136.27  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. McINTOSH, at 10 o'clock and 53 minutes p.m., the 
House adjourned until 9:00 a.m., Tuesday, October 31, 1995.
```
From: Charlie Murphy [mailto:a.cem@verizon.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 4:00 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Cc: Charlie Murphy

Subject: Options In Retirement Accounts

DOL/EBSA,

I have been retired for more than 10 years and manage my own investments. Most of my 

investments are in stocks in an IRA. The IRA stock portfolio typically includes shares in 15 to 20 

listed companies. Most pay dividends; the annual dividend yield for the entire portfolio is 

above 3%.

I regularly write out of the money covered calls on the stocks in my IRA. The purpose is to add 

to the dividend yield by realizing the income from the call premium. In most years I have been 

able to realize an additional 3 to 4% from covered call writing. This is very important 

particularly these days as the yield on interest-earning assets is so poor.

I would like to be able to buy calls and sell puts in the IRA but current regulations prohibit 

that. It is my money, after all. I saved it, I invest and I protect it. If I make a bad choice on the 

purchase of a stock and lose money, that’s my responsibility. Why should that be different for 

puts and calls?

As I am over 72 years of age I must make annual withdraws from my IRA. I need these monies 

to cover my living expenses. In order to buy calls I must withdraw extra funds from my IRA, 

which will be subject to income tax, and deposit the funds in a non-retirement account where I 

have more freedom. If I wished to sell put options I would have to withdraw large sums from 

my IRA in order to secure the put contract; I am not willing to do that because of the tax 

consequences, so I am effectively barred from that choice. If I was able to do that in my IRA, 

the stocks would provide the security for the put. 

I hope that you will consider these reasons and rule in favor of liberalizing IRA account 

transactions.

Thank you,

Charles Murphy
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/20/15 2:56 PM

Received: July 20, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k36-e42p

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2548

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Harry Slade

General Comment

As a financial advisor, one of the most critical needs I address with clients is saving for a secure 

retirement. I work closely with investors to understand their needs, define their financial goals 

and create a tailored plan to help them achieve a secure and comfortable retirement. I am very 

concerned that the Department of Labor's proposed fiduciary rulemaking could limit my ability 

to provide these clients with meaningful education and assistance. 

Edward Jones serves nearly 7 million individual investors. Our clients range from young families 

just starting to prepare for retirement to retirees who have successfully saved for a secure 

retirement. We've found when they work with us, investors are more likely to take a disciplined, 

long-term approach to achieving this important financial goal. 

I strive to serve the best interests of clients every day and fully support a best interest standard. I 

am concerned that under this proposal all investors, including lower and middle income investors 

and small businesses, would lose access to affordable guidance and assistance.

The DOL's proposal is well-intentioned, but after four years of ongoing discussions to craft an 

appropriate standard, I'm concerned the DOL has proposed a rule that still doesn't work. By 

limiting or eliminating the ability of investors to work with financial advisors in ways they find 
meaningful and valuable, it will almost certainly result in less retirement savings at a time when 

savings rates are already low. 

I respectfully ask you to support bipartisan legislation promoting a workable best interest 

standard. We owe it to the millions of investors who have entrusted us with their retirement 

savings to ensure we get a standard of care that truly serves their best interests.

Harry M Slade IV

Financial Advisor-Edward Jones Investments
EXHIBIT 31.1







CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


SECTION 302




I, W. Page Ogden, hereby certify that:








1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Britton & Koontz Capital Corporation;




2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;




3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):





a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.











Date:
August 6, 2009
/s/ W. Page OgdenW. Page OgdenChief Executive Officer
§ 37.17 Designation of responsible employee and adoption of complaint procedures. ( a ) *Designation of responsible employee.* Each public or private entity subject to this part shall designate at least one person to coordinate its efforts to comply with this part.
( b ) *Adoption of complaint procedures.* An entity shall adopt procedures that incorporate appropriate due process standards and provide for the prompt and equitable resolution of complaints alleging any action prohibited by this part and 49 CFR parts 27, 38 and 39. The procedures shall meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) The process for filing a complaint, including the name, address, telephone number, and email address of the employee designated under paragraph (a) of this section, must be sufficiently advertised to the public, such as on the entity's Web site;
( 2 ) The procedures must be accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities;
( 3 ) The entity must promptly communicate its response to the complaint allegations, including its reasons for the response, to the complainant and must ensure that it has documented its response.
[80 FR 13261, Mar. 13, 2015]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 21, 2009 

d1214 

Order 

 

December 21, 2009 

138701 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138701 

 COA: 280767 

Wayne CC: 06-010996-01 

JOHNNY RAZKOM PUTRUS, a/k/a 

JOHHNY RAZKOM PUTRUS, a/k/a 

JOHNY RAZKOM PUTRUS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 10, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54460-54461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4714]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

National Institute of Corrections


Advisory Board Meeting

    Time and Date: 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Monday, October 29, 2007. 8 
a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 30, 2007.
    Place: American Correctional Association, 206 North Washington

[[Page 54461]]

Street, Suite 200, Alexandria, Virginia 22314, 1 (800) 222-5646.
    Status: Open.
    Matters to be Considered: PREA reports; Moss Group; American 
University and Bureau of Justice Statistics; Report by Mike Thompson of 
CGS Justice Center; Future Advisory Board Hearings; Concept For 
National Database Of Providers Of Reintegration Services For Ex-
Offenders; Agency Reports; Quarterly Report by Office of Justice 
Programs; U.S. Parole Commission; American Corrections Association; 
Federal Judicial Center.
    For Further Information Contact: Thomas Beauclair, Deputy Director, 
202-307-3106, ext. 44254.

Morris L. Thigpen,
Director.
[FR Doc. 07-4714 Filed 9-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-36-M
IV

House Calendar No. 91

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 277

[Report No. 107–271]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3167) to endorse the vision

for further enlargement of the NATO Alliance articulated by President

George W. Bush on June 15, 2001, and by former President William

J. Clinton on October 22, 1996, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 6, 2001

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3167) to endorse

the vision for further enlargement of the NATO Alliance

articulated by President George W. Bush on June 15,

2001, and by former President William J. Clinton on

October 22, 1996, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3167) to

4 endorse the vision of further enlargement of the NATO

5 Alliance articulated by President George W. Bush on June
2

HRES 277 RH

1 15, 2001, and by former President William J. Clinton on

2 October 22, 1996, and for other purposes. The bill shall

3 be considered as read for amendment. The amendment

4 recommended by the Committee on International Rela5 tions now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopt6 ed. The previous question shall be considered as ordered

7 on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment

8 thereto to final passage without intervening motion except:

9 (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally

10 divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi11 nority member of the Committee on International Rela12 tions; (2) a further amendment in the nature of a sub13 stitute printed in the Congressional Record pursuant to

14 clause 8 of rule XVIII, if offered by Representative Lantos

15 of California or his designee, which shall be considered as

16 read and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally

17 divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent;

18 and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instruc19 tions.

House Calendar No. 91

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 277

[Report No. 107–271]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3167)

to endorse the vision for further enlargement ofthe NATO Alliance articulated by PresidentGeorge W. Bush on June 15, 2001, and byformer President William J. Clinton on October22, 1996, and for other purposes.

NOVEMBER 6, 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### § 520.33 Timing of proposed NHTSA actions.

To the maximum extent practicable, no administrative action (i.e., any proposed action to be taken by the agency other than agency proposals for legislation to Congress, budget proposals, or agency reports on legislation) subject to this part and covered by an environmental impact statement shall be taken sooner than 90 days after a DEIS has been circulated for comment, furnished to the CEQ, and made public. Neither shall such administrative action be taken sooner than 30 days after the FEIS (together with comments) has been filed with CEQ, and made available to commenting agencies and the public. If the FEIS is filed within 90 days after a DEIS has been circulated for comment, furnished to the CEQ and made public, the 30-day period and 90-day period may run concurrently to the extent that they overlap. The 90-day time period is measured from the date of publication in the Federal Register of the list of weekly filings of environmental impact statements with the CEQ, but the 30-day period is computed from the date of receipt by the CEQ.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 234

Expressing the condolences of the House of Representatives on the death

of the Honorable Floyd Spence, a Representative from South Carolina.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 5, 2001

Mr. SPRATT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the condolences of the House of Representatives

on the death of the Honorable Floyd Spence, a Representative from South Carolina.

1 Resolved, That the House has heard with profound

2 sorrow of the death of the Honorable Floyd Spence, a

3 Representative from the State of South Carolina.

4 Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolu5 tions to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the

6 family of the deceased.

7 Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it ad8 journ as a further mark of respect to the memory of the

9 deceased.

Æ
# ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19-0655 STATE OF MONTANA.

Plaintiffand Appellee, v. ROBERT GONZALEZ,

Defendant and Appellant. 

# FILED NOV 1 0 2020 Bowen Greenwooc Clerk of Supreme Co,jr tatf.• nf Montana ORDER

Counsel for Appellant RobertGonzalezmoves unopposed to dismiss this appeal on the ground that Gonzalez died in custody on October 24, 2020. Gonzalez's death has rendered the issues in this appeal moot. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord. DATED this lb day ofNovember,2020. ChiefJustice n/1 11/10/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0655
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10-32

                              AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
                                     TO THE
                               EXELON CORPORATION
                     SUPPLEMENTAL MANAGEMENT RETIREMENT PLAN

            The Exelon Corporation Supplemental Management Retirement Plan
(formerly the Commonwealth Edison Company Supplemental Management Retirement
Plan) (the "Supplemental Plan") is hereby amended in the following respects:

            Article V of the Supplemental Plan is amended, effective with
respect to Participants who terminate employment with the Company and its
affiliates on or after December 1, 2001, by adding the following text
immediately following Section 5.5 thereof:

            5.6 Gross-Up Payment for Certain State Income Taxes. In the event it
            shall be determined that any payment to a Participant or beneficiary
            pursuant to the terms of this Supplemental Plan that would have been
            paid under a Qualified Plan but for the Limitations (a "Payment") is
            subject to state income tax, but that such Payment would not be
            subject to state income tax if it were paid under such Qualified
            Plan, then such Participant or beneficiary shall be entitled to
            receive an additional payment (a "Gross-Up Payment") in an amount
            such that after payment of all related federal and state income
            taxes, the Participant or beneficiary retains an amount of the
            Gross-Up Payment equal to the state income tax imposed upon the
            Payment. All determinations under this Section 5.6, including
            whether and when a Gross-Up Payment is required, the amount of such
            Gross-Up Payment and the assumptions to be utilized in arriving at
            such determination, shall be made by the Committee in its sole
            discretion. The Committee may, but need not, employ a certified
            public accountant (which may be the Company's public accounting
            firm) to assist the Committee in any such determination.

Executed this ____ day of ___________, 2001.

EXELON CORPORATION


By: _______________________________
    S. Gary Snodgrass
    Senior Vice President and
    Chief Human Resources Officer
EXHIBIT 11

                  Statement Re:  Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         

                                             Three Months Ended        Six Months Ended
                                                   June                      June
                                           _____________________     ______________________
                                             1997          1996        1997        1996
                                           _________   _________     _________   __________
<S>                                        <C>         <C>           <C>         <C>
Primary:
    Average shares outstanding:            1,765,569   1,764,288     1,764,932    1,764,288

    Net effect of the assumed exercise
    of stock options-based on the 
    treasury stock method using
    average stock prices                       1,616       8,368         2,155        8,188
                                           _________   _________    __________   __________                             
             Total                         1,767,185   1,772,656     1,767,087    1,772,476
                                           =========   =========    ==========   ==========
Net income                                  $667,045    $547,257    $1,249,435   $1,052,510
                                           =========   =========    ==========   ==========
Net income per share                           $0.38       $0.31         $0.71        $0.59
                                           =========   =========    ==========   ==========




Fully Diluted:
    Average shares outstanding:            1,765,569   1,764,288     1,764,932    1,764,288

    Net effect of the assumed exercise
    of stock options based on the 
    treasury stock method using
    average market  price or period
    end market price, whichever is higher      1,616       8,780         2,176        8,400
                                           ---------   ---------    ----------   ----------
             Total                         1,767,185   1,773,068     1,767,108    1,772,688
                                           =========   =========    ==========   ==========
Net income                                  $667,045    $547,257    $1,249,435   $1,052,510
                                           =========   =========    ==========   ==========
Net income per share                           $0.38       $0.31         $0.71        $0.59
                                           =========   =========    ==========   ==========


















</TABLE>
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0804.html[7/21/2015 2:44:56 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-j6de

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0804

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Edin Bosnyak

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan for my own requirement and do not need the government involved at all. This is

 ridiculous. Stay out of my money, my planning and my retirement.