alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0840.html[7/21/2015 3:40:11 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-cise

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0840

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Russell Stanger

General Comment

I can take care of my own retirement. I don't need/want the government to do so.
Exhibit 32 .1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viropro, Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB /A
 for the period ending August 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Lee, acting as Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Richard Lee

_______________________________

Richard Lee, Sole Director and Officer

(acted as chief executive officer and principal accounting officer through September 19, 2005.)



Date:   November 17
, 2005.
H. Res. 246

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 25, 2001.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 2586) to authorize appropriations for

fiscal year 2002 for military activities of the Department of

Defense, to prescribe military personnel strengths for fiscal

year 2002, and for other purposes. No further amendment to

the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall

be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such

amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the

report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the

report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the

time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by

the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to

amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division

of the question in the House or in the Committee of the
2

•HRES 246 EH

Whole. All points of order against such amendments are

waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for

amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to

the House with such amendments as may have been adopted.

Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on

any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to

the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a

substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
# Map            South Africa.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, *v.*Louis Brown and Morris Taub, Respondents.

*People*v. Brown, 140 App. Div. 591, appeal dismissed.

(Argued May 29, 1911;

decided June 6, 1911.)

Motion by respondent Taub to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court *586in the first judicial department, entered November 18, 1910, which reversed a judgment of the Court of General Sessions of the Peace of the county of New York rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendants of the crime of forgery in the third degree and directed their discharge from custody.

The motion was made upon the ground that the Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

*Gustavus A. Rogers*for motion.

*Charles S. Whitman, District Attorney (Robert C. Taylor*of counsel), opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed as to respondent Taub.
§ 269.3 Limitations. ( a ) *Route limitations.* The pilot program this part implements is available for not more than three Amtrak long-distance routes.
( b ) *Time limitations.* An eligible petitioner awarded a contract to provide passenger rail service under the pilot program this part implements shall only provide such service for a period not to exceed four years from the date of commencement of service. The Administrator has the discretion to renew such service for one additional operation period of four years.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 24, 1995 (133), Para 133.35 Leave of Absence]
[Page 1587]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.133.35  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--
  To Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, for today;
  To Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, for October 23 through November 3; and
  To Mr. MARTINEZ, for today.
  And then,
```
Exhibit 32-6



Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code



The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Report on Form 10-K of Commonwealth Edison Company for the year ended
December 31, 2008, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Commonwealth Edison Company.



|                       |  |                                                                                                    
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 6, 2009 |  | /s/    ROBERT K.
MCDONALD                                                                          
|                       |  | Robert K. McDonald Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Chief Risk Officer



469
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      9
<LEGEND>       THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED
               FROM BAY COMMERCIAL  SERVICES & SUBSIDIARY  FIRST  QUARTER 1999
               10QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
               FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          8,262
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                5,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    27,589
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         35,152
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           35,258
<LOANS>                                        94,949
<ALLOWANCE>                                     1,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                145,922
<DEPOSITS>                                    133,151
<SHORT-TERM>                                      100
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               714
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        4,121
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                145,922
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 2,118
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 457
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   26
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                2,601
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                866
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                883
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           1,718
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      41
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 1,483
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   436
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        436
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      284
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   5.40
<LOANS-NON>                                        27
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  469
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  980
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       3
<RECOVERIES>                                        2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1020
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1020
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF PALMETTO

BANCSHARES, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned certify that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the
information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and no purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose. The undersigned expressly
disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|                                    
|/s/ L. Leon Patterson               
|L. Leon Patterson                   
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.           
|                                    
|/s/ Lauren S. Greer                 
|Chief Financial Officer             
|The Palmetto Bank                   

Dated: November 19, 2009
§ 245.11 Penalties and consequences for noncompliance. ( a ) Any person (including a railroad; any manager, supervisor, official, or other employee or agent of a railroad; any owner, manufacturer, lessor, or lessee of railroad equipment, track, or facilities; any employee of such owner, manufacturer, lessor, or lessee; or any independent contractor or subcontractor of a railroad) who violates any requirement of this part or causes the violation of any such requirement is subject to a civil penalty of at least the minimum civil monetary penalty and not more than the ordinary maximum civil monetary penalty per violation. However, penalties may be assessed against individuals only for willful violations, and a penalty not to exceed the aggravated maximum civil monetary penalty per violation may be assessed, where: ( 1 ) A grossly negligent violation, or a pattern of repeated violations, has created an imminent hazard of death or injury to persons; or
( 2 ) A death or injury has occurred. *See* 49 CFR part 209, appendix A.
( b ) Each day a violation continues constitutes a separate offense.
( c ) A person who violates any requirement of this part or causes the violation of any such requirement may be subject to disqualification from all safety-sensitive service in accordance with part 209 of this chapter.
( d ) A person who knowingly and willfully falsifies a record or report required by this part may be subject to criminal penalties under 49 U.S.C. 21311.
( e ) In addition to the enforcement methods referred to in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section, FRA may address violations of this part by use of the emergency order, compliance order, and/or injunctive provisions of the Federal rail safety laws.
( f ) FRA's website at *https://railroads.dot.gov/* contains a schedule of civil penalty amounts used in connection with this part.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 11, 2007, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (``the Act''), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (``ASME'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, since March 23, 2007, ASME has published several new standards, initiated several new standards activities, and revised several consensus committee charters within the general nature and scope of ASME's standards development activities, as specified in its original notification. More details regarding these changes can be found at                     *http://www.asme.org.*

                    On September 15, 2004, ASME filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 13, 2004 (69 FR 60895).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 10, 2007. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 8, 2007 (72 FR 31855).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 07-4434 Filed 9-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Theodore Gozy v. The State.

*No. 518.*

*Decided February 20.*

Disturbing Public Assembly— Sufficiency of Evidence.—Where, on atrial for disturbing a public assembly and rudely displaying a pistol, the evidence showed that appellant fired a pistol near a public assembly, and it was contended, that the firing of the pistol did not constitute ‘1 rudely displaying it,” within the meaning of the statute, *Held,*the contention is not maintainable, and it was not necessary that the congregation should have actually seen the pistol at the time it was fired, to constitute “rudely displaying” it.

Appeal from the County Court of Montague. Tried below before Hon. Levi Walker, County Judge.

Appellant was convicted for disturbing a public assembly, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $5.

The opinion states the case.

*147
      *JET. M. Sunt*and *J. M.*Chambers, for appellant.

*Mann Triee,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSOR, Judge.

For the State it is shown that appellant disturbed a congregation, assembled for the purpose of amusement, by firing off a pistol at night, about 100 yards from the assembly. This is testified to by a party who was playing the role of detective and witnessed the shooting. Appellant’s witnesses say, that when the firing occurred he was in the house, and started to the scene of the shooting, but was advised not to go. It is contended this evidence fails to make a case. There was a decided issue as to the veracity of the witnesses testifying pro and con as to appellant’s presence at the place of the shooting. This was decided by the jury in favor of the State. As to the contention that the firing of the pistol by appellant does not constitute “ rudely displaying ” it, within the meaning of the statute, we do not think it well taken. That he fired the pistol was found by the jury; that he held it in his hand, and fired into the air, is testified by the State’s witness who saw it; and we think this sufficiently proves “rudely displaying a pistol,” as contemplated by the statute. It was displayed and it was fired. It was not necessary that the congregation should have actually seen the pistol, it having been fired, to constitute rudely displaying it.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*

Judges all present and concurring.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF **

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER **

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1. | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31,                2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for                the period ending March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                Benda Pharmaceutical, Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 1, 2008                                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                |
| */s/                Eric Yu*                                                                        |
| Eric                YuCFO                and PrincipalAccounting                Officer andDirector |

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2011 

d0620 

Order 

 

June 28, 2011 

142115(26) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142115 

 COA: 298898 

Kalamazoo CC: 2000-000617-FC 

JIMMY LEE JONES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 29, 

2011 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          33,527
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  560,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,873
<INVENTORY>                                  1,396,572
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,245,338
<PP&E>                                       5,627,034
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,708,354
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,244,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,321,230
<BONDS>                                        300,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       264,874
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,337,797
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,244,337
<SALES>                                        620,777
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               620,777
<CGS>                                          326,090
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,130,096
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             156,295
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (665,297)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (665,297)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (665,297)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.25)
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

CHARLES ALVARIS DAWSON, ) DOC #L13487 ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-79 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed August 8, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Pat Siracusa, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A162