alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 22, 2017

t0919 

# Order

Clerk September 22, 2017

155266

KENNETH BERTIN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 155266

COA: 328885

Oakland CC: 2014

- 139901

- NO

DOUGLAS MANN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On the order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27,

2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to sch edule

oral argument on whether to grant the application or to take other action. MCR

7.305(H)(1).

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this

order addressing whether the reckless misconduct standard of care or the o rdinary

negligence standard of care applies to an injury resulting from the operation of a golf cart

while playing golf recreationally. Ritchie

- Gamester v City of Berkley , 461 Mich 73, 87

- 89 (1999). In addition to the brief, the appellant shall electroni cally file an appendix

containing the items listed at MCR 7.312(D)(2). The appellee shall file a supplemental

brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. The appellee shall also

electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use of the appendix

filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within 14 days of

being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements

of their application papers.

The Go lf Association of Michigan and Negligence Law Section of the State Bar of

Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in

the determination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for permission

to fi le briefs amicus curiae.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 5/6/15 8:46 AM

Received: May 05, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8im4-1vuy

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: API

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0267

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I support the proposed regulation defining who is a â€œfiduciaryâ€of an employee benefit plan 

under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) as a result of giving 

investment advice to a plan or its participants or beneficiaries. 

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481ace0bb&format=xml&showor... 5/6/2015
## t>ar-o&r'\^%-Y\l ^

Cit yMinsgf r JO E C . THOMA S Cit yAttorne y DAVI D FRICHARD S Pos t Offic e Box 76 0 Clovis , Ne w Mexic o 88101-076 0 Phon e (573 ) 769-782 8 CLOVI S CITY COMMISSIO N .Major GAYIJ \ HRUMFIHL O Miiyo rPro-Te m I.E N VOU S Commbsionr n U}R1 S BRYAN T OANiEL J STODDAR

D MDK L MADRI D JUA N F . GARZ

A ROBER T SANDOVA L FRE D VA N SOULE N RANDAL L S CROWDE

R Februar y 18,201 1 Mr . Denni s DeVan y Essenria l Ai r Servic e Division , X-5 3 Roo m640 1 Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave . S E Washington , D C 2059 0 U J

r^ :

Re : Recommendatio n Docke t OST #1996-190 2 fo

r EA S funding - Clovis , Ne w Mexic o Dea r Mr . DeVany , Th e Clovi s Cit

y Commissio n a

t it s regula r meetin g o f

Februar y 17* , reviewe dth e recommendatio n fromth e Civi l Aviatio n Boardo n proposal s an dforma l presentation s made b y bot h Great Lake s an dSeaPoi t

airlines . Th e Commissio n vote dunanimousl y t o recommen d Grea t Lake s Airline s t o continu e servic e t o Clovis . Pleas e accep t

thi s lette r o n behal f o f th e City o f

Clovi s a s areconmiendatio n fo r Great Lake s Airline s under

DOT - OST-I996-I902 . Gayla B Mayor Cc : Mr . Brian Swanson , USDO T EA S Mr . Chuc k

Howell , Great

Lake s Airline s Mr , Ro b McKinney , SeaPor t Airline s
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 24, 1995 (133), Para 133.33 Enrolled Bill Signed]
[Page 1587]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.133.33  enrolled bill signed

  Mr. THOMAS, from the Committee on House Oversight, reported that that 
committee had examined and found truly an enrolled bill of the House of 
the following title, which was thereupon signed by the Speaker:

       H.R. 402. An Act to amend the Alaska Native Claims 
     Settlement Act, and for other purposes.
```
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3436

___________ C. Dennis Zyburo; Catherine A. Zyburo, * * Appellants, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * Marriott Hotel Services, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: July 28, 1999

Filed: August 13, 1999

___________ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. C. Dennis Zyburo and Catherine A. Zyburo appeal following an adverse jury verdict in the Zyburos' action to recover for injuries suffered when C. Dennis Zyburo slippedand fell in a Marriott Hotel. The Zyburos contend the district court committed error in admitting certain evidence offered by the hotel and in permitting jury argument about this evidence. The Zyburos also contend the district court committed error in submitting a jury instruction that misstated their theory of liability against the hotel. Having reviewed the record in the context of the Zyburos' arguments, we find the recordsupports the district court's decisions. Because our review involves the applica tion of well-established principles of law in fact intensive circumstances, we-2-

conclude an extensive discussion would serve no useful precedential purpose. We thus affirm the district court without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
AMERICAN(AIRLINES(/(QANTAS(AIRWAYS(JOINT(BUSINESS March!15 ,!2013

Mr.! Todd!Homan

Director,!Office!of!Aviation!Analysis

U.S.! Department!of!Transportation

1200!New!Jersey!Avenue ,!SE

Washington,!DC!20590

Re:!! Verifications!of!Implementation!of!Joint!Business!Agreement

(DOT

Q OST

Q 2011

Q 0111)

Dear!Mr.!Homan:

As!directed!by! Order!201 1

Q 11

Q 12

,! November 9 ,!201 1 (DOT

Q OST

Q 20 11

Q 0 111 )

,! we!hereby!submit!verification!from! American!Airlines ,!Inc. and! Qantas Airways!

Limited attesting!that!their!Joint!Business!Agreement!has!been!implemented.!!!We!

are!filin g!this!letter,!with!attachments,!in!the!docket!and!serving!all!persons!named!

on!the!accompanying!service!list.!!As!further!directed!by!the!Order,!we!will!

separately!submit!to!your!office!a!complete!and!unredacted!copy!of!the!Joint!

Business!Agreement!with!a ppendices.

Respectfully!submitted,!!!!

________________________ JAMES!KALEIGH

Antitrust!Attorney

American!Airlines

4333!Amon!Carter!Blvd

, MD!5675

Fort!Worth,!TX!76155

Phone:!!817

Q 967

Q 3478

Email:!! james.kaleigh@aa.com

EnclosureAMERICAN(AIRLINES(/(QANTAS(AIRWAYS(JOINT(BUSINESS CERTIFICATE!OF!SERVICE!!!!!!!!!! I!hereby!certify!that!I!hav e!this!day!served!the!foregoing! document!by!email!on!

the!following!persons:

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com jhill@dlalaw.com

scott.mcclain@delta.com! steve.morrissey@united.com

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com! mgoldman@sgbdc.com

dan.weiss@united.com! rsilverberg@sgbdc.com

karine.faden@united.com! dhainbach@ggh

Q airlaw.com

esahr@eckertseamons.com! rpomm er@atlasair.com

russell.bailey@alpa.org!!!!!!!! dmrosenthal@jamhoff.com

jonathan.linde@united.com!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! dpdean@jamhoff.com

bob.kneisley@wnco.com! dkirstein@yklaw.com

robert.land@jetblue.com! jyoung@yklaw.com

msinick@ssd.com! willia m.stallings@usdoj.gov

cdonley@ssd.com! dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

gbleopard@fedex.com! john.allen@faa.gov

cefelts@fedex.com urskr@state.gov

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com! gmurphy@crowell.com

nssparks@fedex.com cjsimpson@zsrlaw.com

lh alloway@crowell.com! benjamin.slocum@usairways.com

efaberman@wileyrein.com! howard.kass@usairways.com

mroller@rollerbauer.com! anita.mosner@hklaw.com

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com

________________________________ Franci s!C.!Heil

March!15 ,!2013
Editorial Note on Part 384
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 384 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 384.207 Notification of licensing. Within the period defined in § 383.73(h) of this subchapter, the State must: ( a ) Notify the operator of the CDLIS of each CLP or CDL issuance;
( b ) Notify the operator of the CDLIS of any changes in driver identification information; and
( c ) In the case of transfer issuances, implement the Change State of Record transaction, as specified by the operator of the CDLIS, in conjunction with the previous State of record and the operator of the CDLIS.
[59 FR 26039, May 18, 1994, as amended at 76 FR 26894, May 9, 2011]
1210-AB32-2-1204.html[7/24/2015 8:19:24 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvs-d57y

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1698

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Delene Wood

General Comment

I can control my own retirement!
Exhibit 10.47


 


Base Salaries for Named Executive
Officers


 


In December 2005,
the Compensation Group of E.ON U.S. approved base salary increases for
executive officers for 2006. The 2006 salaries for LG&E’s and KU’s named
executive officers are as follows:


 


	
  Officer Name

  	
   

  	
  2006 Base

  Salary

  	
   

  
	
  Hermann, Chris

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  284,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  McCall, John R.

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  442,500

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Rives, S.
  Bradford

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  360,900

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Thompson, Paul
  W.

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  336,900

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Staffieri,
  Victor A.

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  728,170

  	
   

  



 


The salary increases were
effective December 19, 2005.
**Exhibit 24.22**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS** that I, **Jesse H. Ruiz** do hereby appoint Frank M.Clark and Darryl M. Bradford, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2008 of Commonwealth Edison Company, together with any amendments thereto,to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**Jesse H. Ruiz**

**DATE: February 4, 2009**
§ 38.117 Floors, steps and thresholds. ( a ) Floor surfaces on aisles, step treads and areas where wheelchair and mobility aid users are to be accommodated shall be slip-resistant.
( b ) All step edges and thresholds shall have a band of color(s) running the full width of the step or threshold which contrasts from the step tread and riser or adjacent floor, either light-on-dark or dark-on-light.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSEPH MCCABE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 226 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Is the pretrial disposition program Veterans Treatment Court controlled by 

Chapter 3 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure?

(2) Was [Petitioner] impermissibly denied full benefits of the Veterans 

Treatment Court program, namely a dismissal of charges, based upon his 

inability to pay full restitution, in violation of his Fourteenth Amendment right 

to Due Process and Equal Protection under the United States Constitution?

The Application by the organizations, Equal Justice Under Law, The Pennsylvania 

Legal Aid Network, The Pennsylvania Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and The 

Public Defender Association of Pennsylvania, to appear in addition to the American Civil 

Liberties Union (ACLU) as amici in support of Petitioner is DENIED. The Joint Brief filed 

with the Application will be accepted as from the ACLU only.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the related
Form 10-K financial statements for Ohio Edison Company and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements. (Amounts in 1,000's). Income
tax expense includes $20,305,000 related to other income and $(21,208,000)
related to extraordinary item.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000073960
<NAME> OHIO EDISON COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    4,740,029
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  1,291,261
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         729,723
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     1,972,138
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,733,151
<COMMON>                                             1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    2,098,728
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            583,144
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               2,681,873
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          145,000
<PREFERRED>                                    211,870
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,215,042
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             218,208
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 119,975
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  519,782
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        5,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 4,010
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,612,391
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                8,733,151
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    2,519,662
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           170,053
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,861,786
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,032,742
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        486,920
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              47,621
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 534,541
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       233,221
<NET-INCOME>                                   270,798
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     11,970
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  258,828
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       297,376
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      197,590
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         609,407
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 17, 1995 (129), Para 129.6 Message from the Senate]
[Page 1529]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.129.6  message from the senate

  A message from the Senate by Mr. Lundregan, one of its clerks, 
announced that the Senate had passed with an amendment a bill of the 
House of the following title:

       H.R. 2076. An Act making appropriations for the Departments 
     of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and related 
     agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and 
     for other purposes.

  The message also announced that the Senate insists upon its amendment 
to the bill (H.R. 2076) ``An Act making appropriations for the 
Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and related 
agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other 
purposes'', requests a conference with the House on the disagreeing 
votes of the two Houses thereon, and appoints Mr. Gregg, Mr. Hatfield, 
Mr. Stevens, Mr. Domenici, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Cochran, Mr. 
Hollings, Mr. Byrd, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Bumpers, Mr. Lautenberg, and Mr. 
Kerrey to be the conferees on the part of the Senate.
  The message also announced that the Senate had passed a bill of the 
following title, in which the concurrence of the House is requested:

       S. 1267. An Act to amend the Congressional Award Act to 
     revise and extend authorities for the Congressional Award 
     Board.

  The message also announced that the Senate disagrees to the amendments 
of the House to the bill (S. 641) ``An Act to reauthorize the Ryan White 
CARE Act of 1990, and for other purposes'', requests a conference with 
the House on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses thereon, and 
appoints Mrs. Kassebaum, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Frist, Mr. Kennedy, and Mr. 
Dodd, to be the conferees on the part of the Senate.
  The message also announced that the Senate disagrees to the amendments 
of the House to the bill (S. 652) ``An Act to provide for a pro-
competitive, de-regulatory national policy framework designed to 
accelerate rapidly private sector deployment of advanced 
telecommunications and information technologies and services to all 
Americans by opening all telecommunications markets to competition, and 
for other purposes'', agrees to a conference asked by the House on the 
disagreeing votes of the two Houses thereon, and appoints Mr. Pressler, 
Mr. Stevens, Mr. McCain, Mr. Burns, Mr. Gorton, Mr. Lott, Mr. Hollings, 
Mr. Inouye, Mr. Ford, Mr. Exon, and Mr. Rockefeller, to be the conferees 
on the part of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 31

I, Joseph J. Lazzara, certify that: 

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofScientific Technologies Incorporated;

Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report; 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have: 

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant'smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and 

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): 

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 13, 2003
/s/ JosephJ. Lazzara
###### Editorial Note on Part 381

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 381 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 381.415 Who should I contact if I have questions about the information to be included in my suggestion?

You should contact the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Office of Bus and Truck Standards and Operations (MC-PS), 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.

[63 FR 67608, Dec. 8, 1998, as amended at 72 FR 55700, Oct. 1, 2007]
§ 246.9 Waivers. ( a ) A person subject to a requirement of this part may petition FRA for a waiver of compliance with such requirement. The filing of such a petition does not affect that person's responsibility for compliance with that requirement while the petition is being considered.
( b ) Each petition for a waiver under this section must be filed in the manner and contain the information required by part 211 of this chapter.
( c ) If FRA finds that a waiver of compliance is in the public interest and is consistent with railroad safety, FRA may grant the waiver subject to any conditions FRA deems necessary.
###### Editorial Note on Part 385

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 385.119 Applicability of safety fitness and enforcement procedures.

At all times during which a Mexico-domiciled motor carrier is subject to the safety monitoring system in this subpart, it is also subject to the general safety fitness procedures established in subpart A of this part and to compliance and enforcement procedures applicable to all carriers regulated by the FMCSA.