alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

| EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002             In connection with the Annual Report of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Edmund F. Ryan, Acting Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:             (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and             (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Edmund F. Ryan                Edmund F. RyanActing Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)April 30, 2012 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Central Vermont Public Service Corporation ("CVPS") and will be retained by CVPS and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 365

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 365 appear at 66 FR 49870, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 365.301T Applicable rules.

Generally, all application proceedings are governed by the FMCSA's Rules of Practice at part 386 of this chapter except as designated below.

[82 FR 5300, Jan. 17, 2017]
§ 27.121 Compliance information. ( a ) *Cooperation and assistance.* The responsible Departmental official, to the fullest extent practicable, seeks the cooperation of recipients in securing compliance with this part and provides assistance and guidance to recipients to help them comply with this part.
( b ) *Compliance reports.* Each recipient shall keep on file for one year all complaints of noncompliance received. A record of all such complaints, which may be in summary form, shall be kept for five years. Each recipient shall keep such other records and submit to the responsible Departmental official or his/her designee timely, complete, and accurate compliance reports at such times, and in such form, and containing such information as the responsible Department official may prescribe. In the case in which a primary recipient extends Federal financial assistance to any other recipient, the other recipient shall also submit compliance reports to the primary recipient so as to enable the primary recipient to prepare its report.
( c ) *Access to sources of information.* Each recipient shall permit access by the responsible Departmental official or his/her designee during normal business hours to books, records, accounts, and other sources of information, and to facilities that are pertinent to compliance with this part. Where required information is in the exclusive possession of another agency or person who fails or refuses to furnish the information, the recipient shall so certify in its report and describe the efforts made to obtain the information. Considerations of privacy or confidentiality do not bar the Department from evaluating or seeking to enforce compliance with this part. Information of a confidential nature obtained in connection with compliance evaluation or enforcement is not disclosed by the Department, except in formal enforcement proceedings, where necessary, or where otherwise required by law.
( d ) *Information to beneficiaries and participants.* Each recipient shall make available to participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this regulation and its application to the program or activity for which the recipient receives Federal financial assistance, and make such information available to them in such manner, as the responsible Departmental official finds necessary to apprise them of the protections against discrimination provided by the Act and this part.
[44 FR 31468, May 31, 1979. Redesignated at 56 FR 45621, Sept. 6, 1991. 68 FR 51391, Aug. 26, 2003]
|Exhibit 21.1                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|Tri-Valley Corporation                                                              
|                                                                                    
|Subsidiaries                                                                        
|                                                                                    
|The following are wholly owned subsidiaries of Tri-Valley Corporation:              
|                                                                                    
|Tri-Valley Oil and Gas Company, a California corporation                            
|                                                                                    
|Tri-Valley Power Corporation, a Delaware corporation                                
|                                                                                    
|Select Resources Corporation, Inc., a Delaware corporation                          
|                                                                                    
|In the following two subsidiaries Tri-Valley Corporation has retained a 51% interest
|                                                                                    
|Great Valley Production Services, LLC, a Delaware corporation                       
|                                                                                    
|Great Valley Drilling Company, LLC, a Delaware corporation                          
|                                                                                    
|
#### In Re Guardianship of Michael Langdon. William Kiernan Langdon et al., appellees, v. Margaret Langdon, Guardian, appellant.

Filed May 4, 1918.

No. 20023.

Appeal: Supersedeas Bond. Under section 1528, Rev. St. 1913, an executor, administrator or guardian or guardian *ad litem*is not required to give bond"^ on appeal when the appeal is taken in his representative capacity for the benefit of the estate, or the ward; but when the appeal is taken in furtherance of his individual interests he must give bond like other suitors.

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Willard E. Stewart, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*T. J. Doyle*and *John J. Ledwith,*for appellant.

*433
      *Anthony E. Langdon, William R. Patrick,*and *D. A. Murphy, contra.*

Morrissey, C. J.

Defendant was duly appointed guardian of the person and estate of her husband, insane. As such guardian a large amount of property came into her hands. Subsequently her ward died intestate, leaving defendant and an incompetent son as his sole heirs. ■ Many years went by without her making- any account of her doings as such guardian. This suit was instituted for the purpose of compelling an accounting and recovering the amount due the son. The county Court entered a decree directing her to pay over the amount found to be due the son, to wit, $10,688.78. Defendant undertook to prosecute an appeal to the district court, but gave no supersedeas bond. On motion of plaintiff the appeal was dismissed. From the order of dismissal, defendant prosecutes this appeal.

“An executor, administrator, guardian, or guardian *ad litem*shall not be required to enter into bond in order to enable him to an appeal.” Rev. St. 1913, sec. 1528. The appeal is based upon the foregoing provisions of the statute. We are firmly committed to the doctrine that it does not apply to appeals not prosecuted in the interest of the estate. It means only that executors, administrators and guardians are not required to give bond when they appeal in their representative capacity. When they appeal to protect individual interests, they should give the same bond that is required of other litigants. *In re Estate of Craig,*101 Neb. 439; *In re Williams,*97 Neb. 726, and cases, cited therein. The judgment is against defendant, not against the estate; she is the only person interested in the appeal, and she is not entitled to prosecute the same without giving the bond.

The judgment is

Aeeirmed.

Sedgwick, J., not sitting.
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.329 May a new entrant that has had its USDOT new entrant registration revoked and its operations placed out of service reapply? ( a ) A new entrant whose USDOT new entrant registration has been revoked, and whose operations have been placed out of service by FMCSA, may reapply for new entrant registration no sooner than 30 days after the date of revocation.
( b ) If the USDOT new entrant registration was revoked because of a failed safety audit, the new entrant must do all of the following: ( 1 ) Submit an updated Form MCSA-1, the URS online application.
( 2 ) Submit evidence that it has corrected the deficiencies that resulted in revocation of its registration and will otherwise ensure that it will have basic safety management controls in effect.
( 3 ) Begin the 18-month new entrant monitoring cycle again as of the date the re-filed application is approved.
( c ) If the USDOT new entrant registration was revoked because FMCSA found that the new entrant had failed to submit to a safety audit, it must do all of the following: ( 1 ) Submit an updated Form MCSA-1, the URS online application.
( 2 ) Begin the 18-month new entrant monitoring cycle again as of the date the re-filed application is approved.
( 3 ) Submit to a safety audit.
( d ) If the new entrant is a for-hire motor carrier subject to the registration provisions of 49 U.S.C. chapter 139 and also has had its operating authority revoked, it must re-apply for operating authority as set forth in § 390.201(b) and part 365 of this chapter.
[73 FR 76490, Dec. 16, 2008, as amended at 80 FR 63707, Oct. 21, 2015] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 82 FR 5304, Jan. 17, 2017, § 385.329 was suspended, effective Jan. 14, 2017.
#### George L. Boardman et al., Appellants, *v.*Charles F. Hitchcock et al., as Executors and Trustees under the Will of Annie E. McKenzie, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

*Boardman*v. *Hitchcock.,*136 App. Div. 253, affirmed.

(Argued June 6, 1911;

decided June 16, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 20, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action for the construction of a will.

*Stewart F. Hancock*for appellants.

*E. W. Hamm*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
Exhibit 1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kevin L. Cornwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



     /s/ Kevin L. Cornwell
---------------------------------
Kevin L. Cornwell
Chief Executive Officer
November, 12, 2002
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2460

To amend the Community Services Block Grant Act to redefine the term

‘‘eligible entity’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 11, 1995

Mr. BARTON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the Community Services Block Grant Act to

redefine the term ‘‘eligible entity’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF ELIGIBLE ENTITY.

4 Section 673(1) of the Community Services Block

5 Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9902(1)) is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘(1) The term ‘eligible entity’

7 means’’ and all that follows through ‘‘Public Law

8 98–139 made a grant under this Act in fiscal year

9 1984.’’ and inserting the following:
2

•HR 2460 IH

1 ‘‘(1)(A) The term ‘eligible entity’ means a com2 munity based and operated program—

3 ‘‘(i) which mobilizes and utilizes resources,

4 public or private, of any urban or rural, or com5 bined urban and rural, geographical area (re6 ferred to this part as a ‘community’, including

7 but not limited to a State, metropolitan area,

8 county, city, town, multicity unit, or

9 multicounty unit in an attack on poverty;

10 ‘‘(ii) which provides services, assistance,

11 and other activities of sufficient scope and size

12 to give promise of progress toward elimination

13 of poverty or a cause or cause of poverty

14 through developing employment opportunities,

15 improving human performance, motivation, and

16 productivity, or bettering the conditions under

17 which people live, learn, and work;

18 ‘‘(iii) which is developed, conducted, and

19 administered with the maximum feasible par20 ticipation of residents of the areas and mem21 bers of the groups served; and

22 ‘‘(iv) which is conducted, administered, or

23 coordinated by a public or private nonprofit

24 agency (other than a political party), or com25 bination thereof.’’; and
3

•HR 2460 IH

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘(B)’’ before the text beginning

2 with ‘‘If any geographic area’’ and aligning such text

3 as a subparagraph below subparagraph (A) (as in4 serted by paragraph (1)) and in that text by redesig5 nating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as clauses

6 (i), (ii), and (iii), respectively.

Æ
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/30/15 10:49 PM

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyg-ajkh

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2186

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Joseph Bond

Address: 

593 Highview Rd.

Toccoa,, GA, 30577

Email: josephbond@tfc.edu

Phone: 678-372-5144

General Comment

Stay away from MY Money! It is not yours, and never was. The Federal government has 

screwed up everything it has ever touched. How about leaving my money, left over after your 

exorbitant taxes to feed the lazy, to me. Hundreds of thousands, Dept of labor statistics, have 

made welfare a way of life as their only form of income, not to mention 45% of the Ga state 

budget going to illegals. Will you ever stop rewardind criminals, and the permanently lazy?
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 OMEGA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 9, 2006
    
    /s/ Donita R. KovalDonita R. KovalChief Executive Officer  Page 41
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 4:17 PM

Received: July 19, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k2k-k94f

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2532

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Douglas Ziesse

Organization: Freedomworks

General Comment

I oppose changing any of the rules for existing IRA's or 401K's. This would be unfair to anyone 

who has already invested in them under the rules previously established.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0524.html[7/20/2015 8:08:11 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-gv3y

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0524

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Theresa Goodman

General Comment

I sincerely believe that I am capable of handling my own retirement funds. I have worked in the investment

 industry and I realize what my money is doing and how I should spend it. I do not need the government to

 dictate to me what or when or how my funds should be used.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53276-53277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4604]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Public Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport 
Property at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Texas

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) DOT.

ACTION: Notice of request to release airport property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the 
release of land at Dallas/Forth Worth International Airport under the 
provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. Section 47107.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 7, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to 
the FAA at the following address: Mr. Mike Nicely, Manager, Federal 
Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, Airports Division, Texas 
Airports Development Office, ASW-650, Fort Worth, Texas 76193-0650.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Mr. Jeff Fegan, Airport Manager at the following 
address: Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, 3200 E. Airfield Dr., 
P.O. Box 619428, DFW Airport, TX 75261-9428.
    The request to release property may be reviewed in person at this 
same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 6, 2007, the FAA determined 
that the request to release property at Dallas/Fort Worth International 
Airport submitted by the Airport met the procedural requirements of the 
Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 155.
    The following is a brief overview of the request:
    The Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport requests the release of 
two tracts of non-aeronautical use airport property. One tract is 
0.0274 acres, and the second tract is 2.8736 acres. The 2.8736-acre 
parcel was acquired by the airport with an Airport Improvement Program 
(AIP) grant. The land will be traded for the like amount for right of 
way purposes.

[[Page 53277]]

    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application, 
notice and other documents relevant to the application in person at the 
Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on September 10, 2007.
Kelvin L. Solco,
Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 07-4604 Filed 9-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit 10.3





                                  iParty Corp.


                                  June 8, 2005


    Written Summary of One-Year Part-time Consulting Arrangement with Joseph
                                  Vassalluzzo





         iParty Corp. shall engage Mr. Vassalluzzo to provide consulting
services on a part-time basis over a one-year period beginning on June 8, 2005
to iParty's senior management, in particular iParty's Chairman and CEO, Sal
Perisano, with respect to various retail, operational, strategic, real estate
and store location issues, as may from time to time be necessary and
appropriate. Such services shall on occasion require Mr. Vassalluzzo's presence
at iParty's corporate headquarters in Dedham, Massachusetts and/or current or
proposed store location sites, principally in New England and Florida. On or
before the end of the one-year period commencing on June 8, 2005, iParty Corp.
shall pay Mr. Vassalluzzo one or more payments not to exceed $60,000 cash for
services rendered over the one-year period beginning on June 8, 2005, with such
services to be earned at a rate of $5,000 per month.
#### § 383.155 Tamperproofing requirements.

States must make the CLP and CDL tamperproof to the maximum extent practicable. At a minimum, a State must use the same tamperproof method used for noncommercial drivers' licenses.

[76 FR 26893, May 9, 2011]