alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1463.html[7/23/2015 11:35:04 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-ca27

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1463

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Adrianne Cook

General Comment

I tried to wade through the very dense Regulatory Impact Analysis (available at

 www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/conflictsofinterestria.pdf), but lacking a degree in both finance and governmental

 gibberish, I've had to default to the clearer (by comparison to the Analysis) Executive Summary. As a consumer

 with both a 401k and an IRA, I'm quite startled at the number of instances where less than definite words are

 used. 

If the existing rule has proven to be so damaging to consumers, then I would expect to see hard numbers in the

 summary. How many consumers receive bad advice -- 10%, 35%, 65%? Instead, the summary is littered with

 may, might, and could; perhaps the best example is the concluding sentence: "... adviser conflicts *could* cost

 IRA investors as much as $410 billion over 10 years and $1 trillion over 20 years, so the *potential* additional

 gains to IRA investors from this proposal *could* be very large." If the gains to consumers "could be very

 large," then how large is that? "Could" simply indicates a possibility, not a probability and certainly not a

 definite result. 

Additionally, earlier in the summary, in the section dealing with Fair Dealing, there is reference to "... receive no

 more than reasonable compensation," yet the terms "reasonable compensation" are not defined at all. What is

 reasonable -- 1%, 1/10 of 1%, or does the definition of "reasonable" lie with the brokers and agencies?

Perhaps this proposed Rule could benefit consumers, but it could also negatively impact consumers by driving up

 the cost of investment advice; what are the contingency plans for such a doomsday scenario? What is the

 agency's ultimate goal in proposing these Rules, and how does the agency itself benefit from these changes?

 (No, I don't believe that the Government is an impartial observer; the Government will benefit in some fashion.) 

Just from my brief analysis of the summary, I am not convinced that the proposed Rules will be beneficial to

 consumers; indeed, these appear to be intended to impede private investors with the ultimate goal to make us all

 dependent upon Governmental pensions. Personally, I prefer to support myself through wise savings and
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1463.html[7/23/2015 11:35:04 AM]

 investments, an attitude which I have seen is becoming increasingly unAmerican.
**Exhibit 24-9**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS** that I, **William C. Richardson** do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and William A. VonHoene, Jr., or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2007 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**William C. Richardson**

**DATE: February 4, 2008**
§ 383.52 Disqualification of drivers determined to constitute an imminent hazard. ( a ) The Assistant Administrator or his/her designee must disqualify from operating a CMV any driver whose driving is determined to constitute an imminent hazard, as defined in § 383.5.
( b ) The period of the disqualification may not exceed 30 days unless the FMCSA complies with the provisions of paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) The Assistant Administrator or his/her delegate may provide the driver an opportunity for a hearing after issuing a disqualification for a period of 30 days or less. The Assistant Administrator or his/her delegate must provide the driver notice of a proposed disqualification period of more than 30 days and an opportunity for a hearing to present a defense to the proposed disqualification. A disqualification imposed under this paragraph may not exceed one year in duration. The driver, or a representative on his/her behalf, may file an appeal of the disqualification issued by the Assistant Administrator's delegate with the Assistant Administrator, Adjudications Counsel (MC-CC), Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
( d ) Any disqualification imposed in accordance with the provisions of this section must be transmitted by the FMCSA to the jurisdiction where the driver is licensed and must become a part of the driver's record maintained by that jurisdiction.
( e ) A driver who is simultaneously disqualified under this section and under other provisions of this subpart, or under State law or regulation, shall serve those disqualification periods concurrently.
[67 FR 49759, July 31, 2002, as amended at 72 FR 55700, Oct. 1, 2007]
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Chyron Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Kieliszak, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 31, 2005
January 30, 2001


Board of Directors
Exelon Corporation
10 South Dearborn
37th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60603


Dear Directors:

We are  providing  this letter to you for  inclusion  as an exhibit to your Form
10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have audited the consolidated  financial statements included in the Company's
Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2000 and issued our
report  thereon  dated  January 30,  2001.  Note 4 to the  financial  statements
describes a change in  accounting  principle in  accounting  for nuclear  outage
costs from the accrue in advance method to expense as incurred method. It should
be understood that the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over
another for  accounting  for nuclear  outage costs has not been addressed in any
authoritative accounting literature,  and in expressing our concurrence below we
have  relied  on  management's  determination  that this  change  in  accounting
principle is preferable. Based on our reading of management's stated reasons and
justification for this change in accounting  principle in the Form 10-K, and our
discussions  with  management as to their judgment  about the relevant  business
planning  factors  relating to the change,  we concur with  management that such
change represents, in the Company's circumstances,  the adoption of a preferable
accounting principle in conformity with Accounting  Principles Board Opinion No.
20.


Very truly yours,


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chicago, Illinois
§ 25.500 Employment. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) No person shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination in employment, or recruitment, consideration, or selection therefor, whether full-time or part-time, under any education program or activity operated by a recipient that receives Federal financial assistance.
( 2 ) A recipient shall make all employment decisions in any education program or activity operated by such recipient in a nondiscriminatory manner and shall not limit, segregate, or classify applicants or employees in any way that could adversely affect any applicant's or employee's employment opportunities or status because of sex.
( 3 ) A recipient shall not enter into any contractual or other relationship which directly or indirectly has the effect of subjecting employees or students to discrimination prohibited by §§ 25.500 through 25.550, including relationships with employment and referral agencies, with labor unions, and with organizations providing or administering fringe benefits to employees of the recipient.
( 4 ) A recipient shall not grant preferences to applicants for employment on the basis of attendance at any educational institution or entity that admits as students only or predominantly members of one sex, if the giving of such preferences has the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of these Title IX regulations.
( b ) *Application.* The provisions of §§ 25.500 through 25.550 apply to: ( 1 ) Recruitment, advertising, and the process of application for employment;
( 2 ) Hiring, upgrading, promotion, consideration for and award of tenure, demotion, transfer, layoff, termination, application of nepotism policies, right of return from layoff, and rehiring;
( 3 ) Rates of pay or any other form of compensation, and changes in compensation;
( 4 ) Job assignments, classifications, and structure, including position descriptions, lines of progression, and seniority lists;
( 5 ) The terms of any collective bargaining agreement;
( 6 ) Granting and return from leaves of absence, leave for pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, leave for persons of either sex to care for children or dependents, or any other leave;
( 7 ) Fringe benefits available by virtue of employment, whether or not administered by the recipient;
( 8 ) Selection and financial support for training, including apprenticeship, professional meetings, conferences, and other related activities, selection for tuition assistance, selection for sabbaticals and leaves of absence to pursue training;
( 9 ) Employer-sponsored activities, including social or recreational programs; and
( 10 ) Any other term, condition, or privilege of employment.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/18/15 9:25 PM

Received: July 16, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k0a-pv5a

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2453

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Dennis K

General Comment

I'm quite capable of managing my money, much more so than apparently the Federal government 

is! Keep your hands off of my retirement income. Isn't it enough that you have ruined the Social 

Security by dipping into the fund for your own greedy needs? I will retire with enough income to 

take care of me and my family and pay taxes till the day I die. Leave my money alone!
#### Temple *v.*Hind.

— Cause stricken from calendar, and judgment.
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.402 What definitions are used in this subpart? ( a ) The definitions in parts 390 and 385 of this chapter apply to this subpart, except where otherwise specifically noted.
( b ) As used in this part,
*Hazardous material* has the same meaning as under § 171.8 of this title: A substance or material that the Secretary of Transportation has determined is capable of posing an unreasonable risk to health, safety, and property when transported in commerce, and has designated as hazardous under Sec. 5103 of Federal hazardous materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5103). The term includes hazardous substances, hazardous wastes, marine pollutants, elevated temperature materials, materials designated as hazardous in the Hazardous Materials Table (see § 172.101 of this title), and materials that meet the defining criteria for hazard classes and divisions in part 173 of this title.
*Hazmat employee* has the same meaning as under § 171.8 of this title: A person who is employed by a hazmat employer as defined under § 171.8 of this title, and who in the course of employment directly affects hazardous materials transportation safety. This term includes an owner-operator of a motor vehicle that transports hazardous materials in commerce. This term includes an individual who, during the course of employment: ( 1 ) Loads, unloads, or handles hazardous materials;
( 2 ) Manufactures, tests, reconditions, repairs, modifies, marks, or otherwise represents containers, drums, or packaging as qualified for use in the transportation of hazardous materials;
( 3 ) Prepares hazardous materials for transportation;
( 4 ) Is responsible for the safe transportation of hazardous materials; or
( 5 ) Operates a vehicle used to transport hazardous materials.
*Liquefied natural gas (LNG)* means a Division 2.1 liquefied natural gas material that is transported in a liquid state with a methane content of 85 percent or more.
*Safety permit* means a document issued by FMCSA that contains a permit number and confers authority to transport in commerce the hazardous materials listed in § 385.403.
*Shipment* means the offering or loading of hazardous materials at one loading facility using one transport vehicle, or the transport of that transport vehicle.
#### § 382.603 Training for supervisors.

Each employer shall ensure that all persons designated to supervise drivers receive at least 60 minutes of training on alcohol misuse and receive at least an additional 60 minutes of training on controlled substances use. The training will be used by the supervisors to determine whether reasonable suspicion exists to require a driver to undergo testing under § 382.307. The training shall include the physical, behavioral, speech, and performance indicators of probable alcohol misuse and use of controlled substances. Recurrent training for supervisory personnel is not required.
1210-AB32-2-1290.html[7/24/2015 10:21:19 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvv-wwm2

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1785

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan my own retirement. Please stay out of my retirement plans. It is my decision,not the

 governments on how I want to use and or spend my retirement.
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Charles      Muniz |                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|--------|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:                       | Charles      Muniz                                                                                                                                                                     |   |
|   | Title:                      | Chief      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive      Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of      Alfacell Corporation) |   |
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. George F. Andrews et al., as Executors of Frederick C. Hewitt, Deceased, Respondents and Appellants, *v.*Harry B. Tilbury et al., as Assessors of the Town of Owego, Appellants and Respondents.

*People ex rel. Andrews*v. *Tilbury,*140 App. Div. 76 affirmed.

(Argued January 4, 1911;

decided January 24, 1911.)

Cross-appeals from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 26, 1910, which affirmed an order of Special Term reducing an assessment for purposes of taxation against the estate of Frederick C. Hewitt, deceased.

*585
      *F. W. Clifford*for relators, respondents and appellants.

*William Nelson Noble*and *Fred J. Davis*for defendants, appellants and respondents.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Not sitting: Collin, J.
H. Res. 257

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 10, 2001.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT:

Mr. LaTourette.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 371.105 Must I use a motor carrier that has a valid U.S. DOT number and valid operating authority issued by FMCSA to transport household goods in interstate or foreign commerce?

You may only act as a household goods broker for a motor carrier that has a valid, active U.S. DOT number and valid operating authority issued by FMCSA to transport household goods in interstate or foreign commerce.
#### § 236.774 Movement, facing.

The movement of a train over the points of a switch which face in a direction opposite to that in which the train is moving.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 165 (Monday, August 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49017-49018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4165]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--National Center for Manufacturing Sciences, 
Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 24, 2007, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), National Center for Manufacturing 
Sciences, Inc. (``NCMS'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Ahura Scientific, Inc., Wilmington, MA; 
Ben Franklin Technology Partners, Philadelphia, PA; Camber Corporation, 
Huntsville, AL; City of Detroit Information Technology Services Dept., 
Detroit, MI; Electro-Mechanical Associates, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI; H.A. 
Burrow Pattern Works, Inc., La Habra, CA; I.D. Systems, Inc., 
Hackensack, NJ; MichBio, Ann Arbor, MI; Oxonica plc, Mountain View, CA; 
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN;

[[Page 49018]]

Radian Tool & Engineering, Troy, MI; and Savant Technology Group, Inc., 
Ann Arbor, MI have been added as parties to this venture. Also, 
Anautics, Inc., Oklahoma City, OK; Campfire Interactive, Inc., Ann 
Arbor, MI; Cleveland Advanced Manufacturing Program (CAMP), Cleveland, 
OH; Cor-Met Inc., Brighton, MI; Fraunhofer USA, Plymouth, MI; 
Integrated Technologies, Inc., Danville, VT; Leszynski Group Inc., 
Bellevue, WA; Midwest Thermal Spray, Farmington Hills, MI; and Raytheon 
Systems Company, McKinney, TX have withdrawn as parties to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and NCMS intends to file additional 
written notification disclosing all changes in membership.
    On February 20, 1987, NCMS filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
March 17, 1987 (52 FR 8375).
    The last notification was filed with the Department of Justice on 
February 15, 2007. A notice was published in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 15, 2007 (72 FR 12198).

J. Robert Kramer II,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-4165 Filed 8-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Mason N. Carter, Chief Executive Officer of Merrimac
Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
     June 28, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
     date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements
     of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

/s/ Mason N. Carter
Mason N. Carter
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Merrimac Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Merrimac
Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.