alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–867

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 4945, THE

SMALL BUSINESS COMPETITION PRESERVATION ACT OF

2000

SEPTEMBER 19, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 582]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 582, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 4945, the

Small Business Competition Preservation Act of 2000, under an

open rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate divided

equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the

Committee on Small Business.

The rule waives clause 4(a) of rule XIII (requiring a three-day

availability of the committee report) against consideration of the

bill. The rule provides that the bill shall be open for amendment

at any point.

Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Congressional Record prior to their consideration will be given priority in

recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise consistent with

House rules. The rule allows the Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole to postpone votes during consideration of the bill, and to reduce voting time to five minutes on a postponed question if the vote

follows a fifteen minute vote. Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit, with or without instructions.

The waiver of clause 4(a) of rule XIII is necessary because the

report (106–858) was filed on September 18, 2000 and the bill may

be considered as early as September 20, 2000.

Æ
§ 29.518 What reporting must a Tribe provide? ( a ) A Tribe must provide reports mandated by statute associated with the funds included in the funding agreement. In accordance with § 29.307, the funding agreement will list these reporting requirements. The Tribe will cooperate with the Department to assist the Department in complying with its statutory reporting requirements. No additional reporting will be required of the Tribe.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, if the Tribe includes funds for a discretionary or competitive grant in a funding agreement, the Department and the Tribe will negotiate the appropriate reporting requirements to include in the funding agreement.
1210-AB32-2-1360.html[7/26/2015 2:20:37 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvz-mdbh

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1856

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Scott Klein

General Comment

I have worked long and hard to save for my retirement and now that I am about to enter the home stretch of my

 earning years am I to understand that someone else is to take the reigns and manage my financial affairs in my

 retirement without my consent or any understanding of my plan in retirement? I thought I was free to choose my

 own path. That is what the progressive politicians have been repeatedly saying as of late.

Do these individuals understand my plan or the plans of my wife? They do not.

Do these individuals know my plan or the plans of my family? They do not. 

I am not now or ever will be ready for others who do not personally know me to manage my personal affairs. I

 have found competent resources in people whom I have gotten to know and who know me. These are the people

 who I will be working with to help manage my life in retirement. These people will be accountable to me and if

 they perform to my satisfaction they will continue in my employ. If they do not meet my expectations they will

 be replaced with someone of my own choosing not by a governmental body.

Therefore I would soundly oppose the creation of a nameless, faceless entity to manage my financial affairs in

 retirement.
§ 390.133 Reasons for removal of a certified VA medical examiner from the National Registry of Certified Medical Examiners. FMCSA may remove a certified VA medical examiner from the National Registry of Certified Medical Examiners when a certified VA medical examiner fails to meet or maintain the qualifications established by §§ 390.123 through 390.135, the requirements of other regulations applicable to the certified VA medical examiner, or otherwise does not meet the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 31149. The reasons for removal may include, but are not limited to: ( a ) The certified VA medical examiner fails to comply with the requirements for continued listing on the National Registry of Certified Medical Examiners, as described in § 390.131.
( b ) FMCSA finds that there are errors, omissions, or other indications of improper certification by the certified VA medical examiner of an operator in either the completed Medical Examination Reports or the medical examiner's certificates.
( c ) The FMCSA determines the certified VA medical examiner issued a medical examiner's certificate to an operator of a commercial motor vehicle who failed to meet the applicable standards at the time of the examination.
( d ) The certified VA medical examiner fails to comply with the examination requirements in § 391.43 of this chapter.
( e ) The certified VA medical examiner falsely claims to have completed training in physical and medical examination standards as required by §§ 390.123 through 390.135.
Exhibit 10.44



 







Exhibit 10.44




First Amendment




To French Annex




     Whereas, the Board of Directors of IDM Pharma, Inc. (the “Company”) has determined
that it is in the best interests of the Company to amend the terms of the French Annex to the
Company’s 2000 Stock Plan to provide that the lock-up period described in Section 11 of the French
Annex shall not apply where the optionee exercises his or her option during any permitted
post-termination exercise period that follows his or her termination of service.



     Accordingly, Section 11 of the French Annex is hereby amended and restated in its
entirety as follows, effective as of December 19, 2005:



Lock-Up Period. In the event of an exercise of Qualified Options prior to the
fourth
(4th) anniversary of the Date of Grant1, any shares of Common
Stock received upon exercise of such Qualified Options shall be held in a separate account
with a Company approved brokerage firm and may not be sold, assigned, donated or otherwise
disposed of until the fourth (4th) anniversary of the Date of Grant1.
However, this “Lock-Up Period” shall not apply in the case of death or disability (as
defined under in the second and third categories of Articles L 341-4 of the French social
security code) of the Optionholder. In addition, in the event of retirement or dismissal
(as both terms are defined under applicable law) of the Optionholder, the Lock-Up Period
shall not apply to any shares of Common Stock received upon exercise of Qualified Options,
provided that the relevant Options were exercised at least three months prior to the date of
retirement or dismissal, as the case may be. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Lock-Up
Period shall not apply to any shares of Common Stock received upon exercise of Qualified
Options, provided that the relevant Options were exercised after the date of the termination
of the Optionholder’s Continuous Service in accordance with Article 6(h) of the Plan.
Additionally, the Board shall have the discretionary authority to extend, accelerate or
reduce any Lock-Up Period.





 




			
	1	 	The sale of the shares resulting from the
exercise of the options can not be restricted for a period longer than three
years as from the date of the exercise of the option. Therefore, in order that
the lock-up period is four years from the date of the grant, it should be
ensured that the options can not be vested during the first year from the date
of the grant.






1.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.28

                           HEALTH FITNESS CORPORATION
                       DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

Effective June 1, 2005, the compensation plan for directors who are not
employees of Health Fitness Corporation was determined to be as follows:

     1. Each director receives an annual cash retainer of $12,000 payable
quarterly at a rate of $3,000 in advance of each quarter.

     2. The chairperson of the board receives an additional annual cash retainer
of $6,000 payable quarterly at a rate of $1,500 in advance of each quarter.

     3. The chairperson of the audit committee receives an additional annual
cash retainer of $5,000 payable quarterly at a rate of $1,250 in advance of each
quarter.

     4. The chairperson of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee receives
an additional annual cash retainer of $2,500 payable quarterly at a rate of $625
in advance of each quarter.

     5. The chairperson of the finance and nominating/governance committees
receives a $250 committee meeting fee (in addition to fees paid to all committee
members for their attendance at such committee meetings).

     6. Each director receives a cash payment of $1,000 for attending each
regular and special board meeting. Telephonic board meetings, or a director's
telephonic attendance at a board meeting, are compensated at 75% of the full
payment.

     7. Committee members receive a cash payment of $500 for attending each
regular and special committee meeting up to the following annual limit:
Compensation and Human Capital Committee - eight meetings; and Audit Committee -
eight meetings. The Finance Committee and Nominating/Governance Committee do not
have an annual limit on the number of meetings. Telephonic committee meetings,
or the director's telephonic attendance at a committee meeting, will be
compensated at 75% of the full payment.

     8. Upon the initial election to the Board of Directors, a director receives
a grant of 20,000 shares of common stock.

     9. Upon the initial election to the Board of Directors and annually
thereafter, a director will receive a six-year fully vested option to purchase
15,000 shares of common stock. The option will have an exercise price equal to
the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0890.html[7/21/2015 5:13:31 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-drbc

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0890

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Lisa Tait

General Comment

I do not believe the government should be able to tell me how I will use my retirement money that I have worked

 my whole life to earn. That is totally over stepping governments boundaries. If I have made the decisions about

 my retirement well enough to have earned money for retirement, I certainly don't need the government dictating

 how I can use my money! Stay out of my business!!
#### § 236.729 Cock, double heading.

A manually operated valve by means of which the control of brake operation is transferred to the leading locomotive.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. INDIGENOUS GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant, and DENI G. LEONARD, Defendant - Appellant. No. 08-17116 D.C. No. 3:06-cv-05600-JCS
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Joseph C. Spero, Magistrate Judge, Presiding Submitted September 23, 2010 ** Before: SKOPIL, FARRIS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 

# FILED
NOV 01 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS-2- Deni Leonard appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in this civil enforcement action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), alleging Leonard violated various federal securities laws. He does not, however, directly challenge the violations or the sanctions imposed. Rather, he contends the SEC engaged in discrimina tion and misconduct that requires reversal and remand for trial. We rej ect that contention and affirm. Leonard’s claims of racial discri mination fail because they are vague, conclusory and without factual support. Accordingly, they are “not entitled to an assumption of truth.” See Moss v. U.S. Secret Service , 572 F.3d 962, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (noting allegations of systematic discrimination by government officials without any factual content are conclusory and inadequate). His contention that he was wrongfully advised not to hire an a ttorney fails because there is no evidence that such a recommendation was made ot her than in an unrelated proceeding. We also reject Leonard’s claims of discovery abuse. First, parties are required only to produce documents for inspection and are not obligated to produce copies. See Trevino v. Gates , 99 F.3d 911, 921 n.4 (9th Cir. 1996). Second, the SEC attorneys properly construed Leonard’s list of questions as interrogatories and duly responded to each question pursuant to Federal Rule Civil Rule 33(b).-3- Finally, we reject Leonard’s “jurisdic tional question” related to the SEC’s authority to obtain documents from a nonparty tribal company. Leonard has not demonstrated that the government’s investigative powers do not extend to tribal entities. See EEOC v. Karuk Tribe Housing Authority , 260 F.3d 1071, 1075 (9th Cir. 2001) (“Indian tribes do not . . . enjoy sovereign immunity from suits brought by the federal government.”). AFFIRMED
.
1210-AB32-2-1087.html[7/24/2015 5:34:37 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-e0jg

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1581

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Mark Wahler

Address:

9928 George Washington Drive

McKinney, TX, 75070

General Comment

To Whom It May Concern:

I am more than capable to plan for my own retirement and do not need the DOL to do it for me. My 401K will

 be my back-up when that Socialist Concept called Social Security goes bankrupt, so you may see your way out

 of it. Government assistance is unnecessary and unwanted.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellant,

§

§

No. 08-12-00034-CV

V. §

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 1

MOORE OUTDOOR PROPERTIES, 

L.P. AND ARRINGTON OUTDOOR 

OF FORT WORTH, L.P.,

§

§

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC#07-53500-1)

Appellees.

§

§

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that

Appellees recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see TEX. R. APP. P. 43.5, on the 

judgment and all costs, both in this Court and the court below for which let execution issue. This 

decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2013.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before Rivera, J., Rodriguez, J., and Larsen, J. (Senior Judge)

Larsen, J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 284 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 16, 2001.
Whereas in response to the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 
        11, 2001, the United States is engaged in Operation Enduring Freedom, 
        which will require the men and women of the Armed Forces to engage and 
        defeat terrorists, and which will require both military and civilian 
        personnel to protect the Nation from further attack; and
Whereas it is imperative that the Nation support the Armed Forces and civilian 
        personnel in such an effort: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes and commends the efforts of State and local 
        governments, and community, religious, and charitable organizations to 
        support the Armed Forces engaged in Operation Enduring Freedom, as well 
        as civilian personnel who are also engaged in the war on terrorism;
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to further support 
        the Armed Forces and civilian personnel through a united effort to be 
        known as Operation Enduring Support;
            (3) encourages the people of the United States, as part of Operation 
        Enduring Support--
                    (A) to support the families of Armed Forces personnel;
                    (B) to stage patriotic send-off and welcome-home rallies and 
                parades; and
                    (C) to volunteer and contribute financial assistance to 
                volunteer and charitable organizations.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IR Chart of FT008-1Test SampleFT008-1 (Meiwa Plastic Industries, Ltd.)CAS Registry Number: 918825-38-4CA Index Name: 1,3-Benzendiol, polymer with 4,4'-bis(chlorometyl)-1,1'-biphenyl and phenol4000.03600320028002400200018001600140012001000800650.049.25254565860626466687072747678808284868890.1cm-1%T
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 21, 1995 (119), Para 119.4 Message from the Senate]
[Page 1428]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.119.4  message from the senate

  A message from the Senate by Mr. Lundregan, one of its clerks, 
announced that the Senate had passed bills of the following titles, in 
which the concurrence of the House is requested:

       S.J. Res. 20. Joint resolution granting the consent of 
     Congress to the compact to provide for joint natural resource 
     management and enforcement of laws and regulations pertaining 
     to natural resources and boating at the Jennings Randolph 
     Lake Project lying in Garrett County, Maryland and Mineral 
     County, West Virginia, entered into between the States of 
     West Virginia and Maryland; and
       S. Con. Res. 27. Concurrent resolution correcting the 
     enrollment of H.R. 402.
```
Editorial Note on Part 365
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 365 appear at 66 FR 49870, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 365.405 Reporting requirement. ( a ) Every transfer of operating authority from one person to another person must be reported by both the transferee and transferor using the URS online application, Form MCSA-1, (available at *http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/urs*) in accordance with § 390.201(d)(5) of this subchapter.
( b ) The following information must be furnished: ( 1 ) Full name, address and USDOT Numbers of the transferee and transferor.
( 2 ) A copy of the operating authority being transferred.
Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 88 FR 80179, Nov. 17, 2023, § 365.405 was suspended indefinitely, effective Nov. 17, 2023.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.81 What laboratories may be used for DOT drug testing? ( a ) As a drug testing laboratory located in the U.S., you are permitted to participate in DOT drug testing only if you are certified by HHS under the National Laboratory Certification Program (NLCP) for each specimen testing methodology performed under this part.
( b ) As a drug testing laboratory located in Canada or Mexico which is not certified by HHS under the NLCP, you are permitted to participate in DOT drug testing only if: ( 1 ) The DOT, based on a written recommendation from HHS, has approved your laboratory as meeting HHS laboratory certification standards or deemed your laboratory fully equivalent to a laboratory meeting HHS laboratory certification standards for all testing required under this part; or
( 2 ) The DOT, based on a written recommendation from HHS, has recognized a Canadian or Mexican certifying organization as having equivalent laboratory certification standards and procedures to those of HHS, and the Canadian or Mexican certifying organization has certified your laboratory under those equivalent standards and procedures.
( c ) As a laboratory participating in the DOT drug testing program, you must comply with the requirements of this part. You must also comply with all applicable requirements of HHS in testing DOT specimens, whether or not the HHS requirements are explicitly stated in this part.
( d ) If DOT determines that you are in noncompliance with this part, you could be subject to PIE proceedings under Subpart R of this part. If the Department issues a PIE with respect to you, you are ineligible to participate in the DOT drug testing program even if you continue to meet the requirements of paragraph (a) or (b) of this section.
[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 88 FR 27643, May 2, 2023; 89 FR 51983, June 21, 2024]