alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CHRISTOPHER MARTIN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3817

Opinion filed November 14, 2014.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Christopher Martin, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking a belated appeal of the Order Denying “Second Amended 

Motion for Post Conviction Relief” rendered on June 9, 2014, in Gadsden County 

Circuit Court case number 2008-CF-A0407 is granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a 

copy of this opinion shall be furnished to the clerk of the lower tribunal for treatment 

as a notice of appeal. 

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
**Exhibit      4.10**

**FORM      OF**

**ALPHA      INNOTECH CORP.**

**2006      EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN**

**RESTRICTED      STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT **

**‹GRANT      DATE›**
**‹EMPLOYEE›‹NAME›**

**WITNESSETH:**

**      (**

**Grant      of Stock Award**
**.      **
**‹SHARES›      **
** **

**Vesting      Schedule**
**.**
**‹INSERT      VESTING PROVISION HERE›**
**‹INSERT      FULL VESTING DATE HERE›**
** **

**Termination**
**.**

**Transfer      Restrictions**
**.      **

----

**Stockholder      Rights**
**.      **

**Taxes**
**.      **

----

**Data      Privacy Consent**
**.      **

----

** **

**Plan      Information**
**.      **

**Acknowledgment      and Waiver**
**.      **

----

** **

**Miscellaneous**
**.      **

| Accepted                by Employee:   _________________________________[Employee                Name] | ALPHA                INNOTECH CORP.  By:                __________________________________ Name:________________________________ Title:                _________________________________ |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

SV      2261798 v1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 53592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4627]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center For Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the 
Integrative Physiology of Obesity and Diabetes Study Section, October 
4, 2007, 8 a.m. to October 5, 2007, 5 p.m., Embassy Suites DC 
Convention Center, 900 10th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001 which was 
published in the Federal Register on September 10, 2007, 72 FR 51649-
51651.
    The meeting will be held one day only October 4, 2007. The meeting 
time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: September 12, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-4627 Filed 9-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Memorandum to Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505

EPA staff met with DOE’s Advanced Research Projects Agency for Energy (ARPA-E) staff on 8/6/2015 to 

discuss ways to provide for future innovation in the Oil and Gas NSPS in the context of fugitive emissions 

monitoring.

External Attendees: 

Nathaniel Gorence, US Department of Energy

Bryan Willson, US Department of Energy

Christopher Konek, Booz Allen Hamilton
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 119 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 26, 2001.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 503) to amend title 18, United States Code, 
and the Uniform Code of Military Justice to protect unborn children from assault 
and murder, and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read for 
amendment. The amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any 
further amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: 
(1) two hours of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled 
by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; 
(2) the further amendment printed in the Congressional Record pursuant to clause 
8 of rule XVIII and numbered 1, if offered by Representative Lofgren of 
California or her designee, which shall be considered as read and shall be 
separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Crim. No. 284.

Second Appellate District.

March 17, 1913.]

#### In the Matter of the Application of GEORGE WORTHINGTON for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Criminal Law—Use of Automobile on Highway—Sufficiency of Complaint.—A complaint that charges the violation of the act governing the *use*of automobiles on public highways, which does not aver that the defendant used or operated his automobile on a public highway, fails to state a public offense.

APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Jas. W. Bell, for Petitioner.

A. E. Koepsel, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

It appearing to the court that the act which petitioner is charged with having violated is one entitled, an act governing the use of automobiles upon public highways, and it not being averred in the complaint that the defendant used or operated his automobile upon a public highway, the complaint failed to state any public offense, and for that reason it is ordered that petitioner be discharged, and that the money deposited in lieu of bail be returned.
-----Original Message----- 

From: plumprd@ptd.net [mailto:plumprd@ptd.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 4:31 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Phillip Rouse 

872 Plum Creek Road 

Sunbry, PA 17801
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

881 

KA 10-02116 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RONNIE DIGGS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Monroe County

(David D. Egan, J.), rendered September 2, 2010. Defendant was

resentenced upon his conviction of robbery in the first degree (four

counts), robbery in the second degree (three counts), assault in the

second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the resentence so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a resentence pursuant to

which Supreme Court added various terms of postrelease supervision

(PRS) to the sentence previously imposed on his conviction, following

a jury trial, of four counts of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law

§ 160.15 [2], [4]), three counts of robbery in the second degree (§

160.10 [1], [2] [a]), and one count each of assault in the second

degree (§ 120.05 [2]), and criminal possession of a weapon in the

second degree (§ 265.03 [former (2)]). Defendant contends that the

over seven-year gap between his original sentencing and his

resentencing divested the court of jurisdiction to resentence him

pursuant to CPL 380.30 (1) (see People v Williams, 14 NY3d 198, 213). 

Defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review (see

People v Dissottle, 68 AD3d 1542, 1543, lv denied 14 NY3d 799; People

v Cecere, 39 AD3d 557, 558, lv denied 9 NY3d 873), and we decline to

exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion

in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). 

Entered: September 28, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 10.3
 UNITED COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.
1999 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
AWARD AGREEMENT
 Agreement   Company Grantee Plan
 RECITALS
 Committee
   Grant of Award Award Statement of Award
 Terms and Conditions of the Award
 General Exercise Price
 Certain Provisions if the Award is an Option
    43




---



##### 



Certain Provisions for Incentive Stock Options ISO Code
     Certain Provisions if the Award is a Stock Appreciation Right
 Certain Provisions if the Award is Restricted Stock
 Satisfaction of Taxes and Tax Withholding
 Governing Law
 WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL . THE PARTIES, EACH AFTER CONSULTING OR HAVING HAD THE OPPORTUNITY
TO CONSULT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL, KNOWINGLY, VOLUNTARILY AND INTENTIONALLY WAIVE ANY RIGHT THEY MAY
HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY
 44




---



##### 



LITIGATION ARISING OUT OF, OR RELATED TO, THIS AGREEMENT. NO PARTY SHALL SEEK TO CONSOLIDATE, BY
COUNTERCLAIM OR OTHERWISE, ANY LITIGATION IN WHICH A JURY TRIAL HAS BEEN WAIVED WITH ANY OTHER
LITIGATION IN WHICH A JURY TRIAL CANNOT BE OR HAS NOT BEEN WAIVED.
 Rights and Remedies Cumulative
 Captions
 Severability
 Plan as Controlling
 Entire Agreement
  UNITED COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.By:Name:Title:Grantee«Name»
 45




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
STATEMENT OF AWARD
 Grantees Name and Address:
 Award
  Type of Award:Incentive Stock Option
    
    o
    
    Stock Appreciation Right
    
    oNonqualified Stock Option
    
    o
    
    Stock Appreciation Right
and Tandem Option
    
    oRestricted Stock
    
    o
 Date of Grant:If Option or SAR, Exercise Price per Common Share:
    
    $Number of Common Shares Covered by Award:Expiration Date:
 Vesting Schedule:
  Number of Shares Covered by AwardDate
    
    Which Become Exercisable
    
    Cumulative Percentage Vested
   46
#### Martha Pyers, Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The New York and New England Railroad Company, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
#### § 28.102 Application.

This part applies to all programs or activities conducted by the Department except for programs and activities conducted outside the United States that do not involve individuals with handicaps in the United States.
#### § 25.540 Advertising.

A recipient shall not in any advertising related to employment indicate preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination based on sex unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the particular job in question.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132588 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132588 COA: 271758 Livingston CC: 03-013361-FH STEWART DAVID BARRON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 11, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t0220 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2007

Clerk
§ 238.439 Doors. In addition to the requirements of § 238.112— ( a ) The status of each powered, exterior side door in a passenger car shall be displayed to the crew in the operating cab. If door interlocks are used, the sensors used to detect train motion shall be nominally set to operate at 3 mph.
( b ) Each powered, exterior side door in a passenger car shall be connected to an emergency back-up power system.
( c ) For a passenger car ordered prior to January 28, 2014, and placed in service prior to January 29, 2018, a passenger compartment end door (other than a door providing access to the exterior of the trainset) shall be equipped with a kick-out panel, pop-out window, or other similar means of egress in the event the door will not open, or shall be so designed as to pose a negligible probability of becoming inoperable in the event of car body distortion following a collision or derailment.
[64 FR 25660, May 12, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 19993, Apr. 23, 2002; 78 FR 71815, Nov. 29, 2013]
Editorial Note on Part 389
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 389 appear at 66 FR 49873, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 389.21 Submission of written comments. ( a ) You may submit comments identified by the docket number provided in the rulemaking document using any of the following methods. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods. ( 1 ) *Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov .* Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
( 2 ) *Mail:* Dockets Operations, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
( 3 ) *Hand Delivery or Courier:* West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
( 4 ) *Fax:* (202) 493-2251.
( b ) All written comments must be submitted in English and include copies of any material that the commenter refers to within the comment.
[85 FR 86849, Dec. 31, 2020]
IV

House Calendar No. 46

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 180

[Report No. 107–114]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2311) making appropriations

for energy and water development for the fiscal year ending September

30, 2002, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 26, 2001

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2311) making

appropriations for energy and water development for the

fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and for other

purposes.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the Bill (H.R. 2311) making appropriations for

6 energy and water development for the fiscal year ending
2

HRES 180 RH

1 September 30, 2002, and for other purposes. The first

2 reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of

3 order against consideration of the bill are waived. General

4 debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed

5 one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman

6 and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appro7 priations. After general debate the bill shall be considered

8 for amendment under the five-minute rule. The amend9 ment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules ac10 companying this resolution shall be considered as adopted

11 in the House and in the Committee of the Whole. Points

12 of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, for fail13 ure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived except

14 section 308. During consideration of the bill for further

15 amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole

16 may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether

17 the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be

18 printed in the portion of the Congressional Record des19 ignated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amend20 ments so printed shall be considered as read. At the con21 clusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

22 Committee shall rise and report the bill, as amended, to

23 the House with such further amendments as may have

24 been adopted. The previous question shall be considered

25 as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final
3

HRES 180 RH

1 passage without intervening motion except one motion to

2 recommit with or without instructions.
House Calendar No. 46

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 180

[Report No. 107–114]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2311)

making appropriations for energy and water development for the fiscal year ending September30, 2002, and for other purposes.

JUNE 26, 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Summary of Compensation for



Exhibit 10.39


Description of Compensation and Benefits for Directors

1. Cash Compensation of Non-employee Directors. Effective
upon the Company's emergence from bankruptcy, non-employee directors receive
a $20,000 annual retainer, $1,000 per meeting attended, and $5,000 per
year for chairing certain Board committees; provided, however, that each
of the Chair of the Audit Committee and the Lead Director receive $10,000
per year.


2. Flight Benefits for Directors. Generally, directors, their
spouses and their dependent children are entitled to complimentary positive
space travel on United Airlines and United Express for pleasure or UAL
business travel, and are reimbursed annually for the income tax liability
incurred in using this privilege.
3. Complimentary Cargo Carriage Policy for Directors. Directors
receive complimentary cargo carriage (excluding ground transportation)
for personal goods on United Airlines, for up to 2,500 pounds per year,
and are reimbursed for the related income tax liability.

4. Stock Based Compensation of Non-employee Directors. Under
the UAL Corporation 2006 Director Equity Incentive Plan, non-employee directors
may receive awards in the form of UAL common stock, restricted stock, stock
options, stock appreciation rights and/or deferred stock units representing
the right to receive UAL stock in the future. In addition, the Plan permits
non-employee directors to elect, for tax purposes, to defer receipt of
compensation through deferred stock units representing the right to receive
UAL stock in the future.


5. Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance and Indemnification.
The Company has a policy which provides liability insurance for directors
and officers of UAL and its subsidiaries. The Company also provides indemnification
for directors as set forth in the Restated Certificate of Incorporation
of UAL Corporation.
**Exhibit 99.1**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to****Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David H. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

|   | 1.     |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |
|   | 2.     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|  |   |   |                                                                                                                             |
|--|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  |   |   | /s/ DAVID H. GILL   **David H. Gill, President and C.E.O.****(Principal Executive Officer)**
November 12, 2002
18 |
§ 245.109 Determinations required for certification and recertification. ( a ) After FRA has approved a railroad's dispatcher certification program, the railroad, prior to initially certifying or recertifying any person as a dispatcher, shall, in accordance with its FRA-approved program, determine in writing that: ( 1 ) The individual meets the prior safety conduct eligibility requirements of §§ 245.111 and 245.113;
( 2 ) The individual meets the eligibility requirements of §§ 245.115 and 245.303;
( 3 ) The individual meets the visual and hearing acuity standards of §§ 245.117 and 245.118;
( 4 ) The individual has the necessary knowledge, as demonstrated by successfully completing a test that meets the requirements of § 245.121; and
( 5 ) If applicable, the individual has completed a training program that meets the requirements of § 245.119.
( b ) Nothing in this section, § 245.111, or § 245.113 shall be construed to prevent persons subject to this part from entering into an agreement that results in a railroad obtaining the information needed for compliance with this subpart in a different manner than that prescribed in § 245.111 or § 245.113.
§ 380.301 General requirements. There are two types of LCV driver-instructors: Classroom instructors and Skills instructors. Except as provided in § 380.303, you must meet the conditions under paragraph (a) or paragraph (b) of this section to qualify as an LCV driver-instructor. ( a ) *Classroom instructor.* To qualify as an LCV Classroom instructor, a person shall: ( 1 ) Have audited the driver-training course that he/she intends to instruct.
( 2 ) If employed by a training institution, meet all State requirements for a vocational instructor.
( b ) *Skills instructor.* To qualify as an LCV skills instructor, a person shall: ( 1 ) Provide evidence of successful completion of the Driver-Training Program requirements, as set forth in subpart B of this part, when requested by employers and/or an authorized FMCSA, State, or local official in the course of a compliance review. The Driver-Training Program must be for the operation of CMVs representative of the subject matter that he/she will teach.
( 2 ) If employed by a training institution, meet all State requirements for a vocational instructor;
( 3 ) Possess a valid Class A CDL with all endorsements necessary to operate the CMVs applicable to the subject matter being taught (LCV Doubles and/or LCV Triples, including any specialized variation thereof, such as a tank vehicle, that requires an additional endorsement); and
( 4 ) Have at least 2 years' CMV driving experience in a vehicle representative of the type of driver training to be provided (LCV Doubles or LCV Triples).