alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1210-AB32-2-1123.html[7/24/2015 6:15:53 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-kqur

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1617

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Loretta White

General Comment

My husband and I have spent more than 30 years preparing for our retirement. We are quite capable of planning

 for and carrying out our plans for our retirement. I do not need nor want the government's interference. Please

 stay out!
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JOSEPH LUSHINGTON GARRELL, ) DOC #T49977 ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4109 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed December 19, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Chet A. Tharpe, Judge. Joseph Lushington Garrell, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
1210-AB32-2-1178.html[7/24/2015 7:17:36 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvr-m8zz

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1672

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Brady Cuthbert

General Comment

The government has put the United States in debt, they can't even balance the budget, and now they want to put a

 bunch of bureaucrats in charge of my retirement. Thanks, but no thanks! I can plan my own retirement. 

If the U.S. government is so concerned about our personal finances, then why don't they encourage finance

 classes in public schools? Americans would learn how to manage their money -- and perhaps our future

 politicians and bureaucrats would learn a thing or two about how to manage our tax dollars.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0820.html[7/21/2015 2:55:05 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-6f26

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0820

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I am retired already, but for those that will have no chance I want to make it clear. They deserve to plan their

 own retirement not the government. I am getting tired of all of you telling us what to do, how to do it. My

 grandparents on both sides came to this country for freedom. We have lost that even now with all of you telling

 us we have to follow your advice.
98-774.

#### Planet Earth Entertainment, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.

Franklin App. No. 97APE06-744. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of conflict by the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to dismiss on suggestion of mootness,

It is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss on suggestion of mootness be, and hereby is, granted.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1312.html[7/22/2015 10:11:38 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvf-4yxj

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1312

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Charles Wheeler III

Address:

Lilly, PA,

General Comment

I am more than capable of planning and managing my retirement with no help from the government. I do not

 want or need the governments help with this matter. I live my life and know what I need, the government

 doesn't. Just leave my retirement alone and do not touch it.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsChebyshev polynomials are not always optimalThe problem is that of finding among all polynomials of degree at most n and normalized to be 1 at c the one with minimal uniform norm on Epsilon. Here, Epsilon is a given ellipse with both foci on the real axis and c is a given real point not contained in Epsilon. Problems of this type arise in certain iterative matrix computations and, in this context, it is generally believed and widely referenced that suitably normalized Chebyshev polynomials are optimal for such constrained approximation problems. It is shown that this is not true in general. Moreover, sufficient conditions are derived which guarantee that Chebyshev polynomials are optimal. Some numerical examples are also presented.Document ID19900014692Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsFischer, Bernd*(Hamburg Univ. (Germany F.R.)., United States)*Freund, Roland*(Wuerzburg Univ. Germany, F.R. , United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1989Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberRIACS-TR-89.17NASA-CR-181465NAS 1.26:181465Accession Number90N24008Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-387Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014692.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsData quality analysis at the National Transonic FacilityThe data quality analysis program that was developed at Langley Research Center's National Transonic Facility is described. The program provides a computer driven systematic analysis of data taken during calibrations of the high speed digital data acquisition system. Five distinct checks that are performed on the calibration data are outlined. The five checks are for non-linearity, noise, short term drift, long term drift, and the proper functioning of the calibrator. The program has established a standard set of evaluation guidelines.Document ID19900014641Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsStewart, Pamela N.*(Wyle Labs., Inc. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1990Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-4303NAS 1.26:4303Accession Number90N23957Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18304PROJECT: RTOP 505-61-01-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014641.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of his knowledge:  1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Union Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ David S. SilvermanDavid S. SilvermanChief Executive Officer








February 29, 2016
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 846

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to

prescribe a rule that prohibits the importation for disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls at concentrations of 50 parts per million or greater.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 2001

Ms. RIVERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to prescribe a rule that prohibits the importation for disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls at concentrations of 50 parts per million or greater.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF POLY4 CHLORINATED BIPHENYLS FOR DISPOSAL.

5 Section 6(e) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (15

6 U.S.C. 2605(e)) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing new paragraph:
2

•HR 846 IH

1 ‘‘(6)(A) The Administrator shall promulgate rules to

2 prohibit the importation into the United States for dis3 posal of polychlorinated biphenyls, or polychlorinated

4 biphenyl items, at concentrations of 50 parts per million

5 or greater.

6 ‘‘(B)(i) The Administrator may use the authority

7 under paragraph (3)(B) to accept and consider petitions

8 to exempt from the prohibition prescribed under subpara9 graph (A) of this paragraph specific transboundary ship10 ments into the United States for disposal of poly11 chlorinated biphenyls, or polychlorinated biphenyl items,

12 at concentrations of 50 parts per million or greater.

13 ‘‘(ii) In any case in which the Administrator grants

14 an exemption pursuant to such a petition, the Adminis15 trator shall submit to Congress a report containing notice

16 of the exemption and the reasons for the exemption. The

17 exemption may not take effect until the expiration of the

18 60-day period beginning on the date the report is received

19 by Congress.’’.

Æ
Order entered December 15 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 21

- 00319

- CR

MARCELINO LOPEZ

- MARTINEZ , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from th e 199th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199

- 83185

- 2020

O RDER Before the Co urt En Banc

Before the Court is appellant ’ s Nove mber 16, 2022 motion for

reconsideration en banc. Appel lant ’ s mo tion is DENIED

.

/s/ ROBERT D. B U RNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
§ 239.103 Passenger train emergency simulations. ( a ) *General.* Each railroad operating passenger train service shall conduct full-scale emergency simulations, in order to determine its capability to execute the emergency preparedness plan under the variety of scenarios that could reasonably be expected to occur on its operation, and ensure coordination with all emergency responders who voluntarily agree to participate in the emergency simulations.
( b ) *Frequency of the emergency simulations.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section: ( 1 ) Each railroad that provides commuter or other short-haul passenger train service and whose operations include less than 150 route miles and less than 200 million passenger miles annually, shall conduct a minimum of one full-scale emergency simulation during every two calendar years.
( 2 ) Each railroad that provides commuter or other short-haul passenger train service and whose operations include at least 150 route miles or at least 200 million passenger miles annually, shall conduct a minimum of one full-scale emergency simulation during each calendar year.
( 3 ) Each railroad that provides intercity passenger train service, shall conduct a minimum of one full-scale emergency simulation during each calendar year, regardless of the number of route miles or passenger miles.
( c ) *Actual emergency situations.* Neither a tabletop exercise nor the activation of its emergency preparedness plan during an actual emergency situation may be credited toward the minimum number of full-scale emergency simulations required under paragraph (b) of this section. However, a railroad that has activated its emergency preparedness plan in response to a major emergency may elect to postpone a scheduled full-scale simulation for up to 180 calendar days beyond the applicable calendar year completion date in order to evaluate the effectiveness of its plan during that major emergency and, as appropriate, modify the rescheduled simulation.
( d ) *Definition.* As used in this section, *major emergency* means an unexpected event related to the operation of passenger train service that results in serious injury or death to one or more persons and property damage greater than the current reporting threshold of part 225 of this chapter to railroad on-track equipment, signals, tracks, track structures, or roadbeds, including labor costs and the costs for acquiring new equipment and material.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00343

- CV

D EVON E NERGY C ORPORATION ;

D EVON E NERGY P RODUCTION

C OMPANY

, L.P. ; AND D EVON G AS

S ERVICES

, L.P., Appellants

V

.

I ONA E NERGY

, L.P., Appellee §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 271st Di str i ct Court

of Wise County (CV18

- 05

- 382)

January 9, 20 20

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in the trial court’s order denying the motion to tr ansfer ven ue filed by

appellants Devon Energy Corporation; Devon Energy Production Company , L.P.;

and Devon Gas Services, L.P

. The trial court ’ s deni al o r der is reversed and the case is

remanded to th at court with instructions to sustain the motion and to transfer venue

as to appellee Iona Ene rgy, L.P. ’ s claims to T arrant County

.

It is further ordered that appellee Iona Energy, L.P. shall bear the cos ts of this

appeal, for which let execution issue.SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 22, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00598

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF CARLOS Y. BENAVIDES, JR. , an

Incapacitated Person,

From the Cou nty Court At Law No 1

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- PB6

– 000081

- L2

Honorable Hugo Martinez , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The A ppellant ’ s Leticia R. Benavides ’ s Unopposed Motion for Ext e nsion of Time to File

R e ply Brief is GRANTED. T he appellant ’ s reply brief is due on September 24, 2021.

Enter ed on this 22 nd d ay of September 22, 2021.



### PER C URIAM

A ttested to:

_____________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 that to the best of his knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Union Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union Bankshares,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


/s/ Kenneth D. Gibbons
----------------------
Kenneth D. Gibbons
Chief Executive Officer

August 13, 2007

                                      43
**Exhibit 32.a**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofCinergy Corp., The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, PSI Energy, Inc. andThe Union Light, Heat and Power Company (the “Companies”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James E. Rogers, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to thebest of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Companies.

 
| Date:  February 25, 2005 |
|------------------------------------|
|                               |
| /s/                                | James E.  Rogers |   |
|                               | James E.  Rogers |
|                               | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
126 STAT. 2406 PUBLIC LAW 112–252—JAN. 10, 2013 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5859: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112–591 (Comm. on Energy and Commerce). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012): 

July 23, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 21, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–252 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To repeal an obsolete provision in title 49, United States Code, requiring motor 

vehicle insurance cost reporting. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REPEAL. 

Subsection (c) of section 32302 of title 49, United States Code, 

is repealed, and any regulations promulgated under such subsection 

shall have no force or effect. 

SEC. 2. DETERMINATION REGARDING PROVISION OF DAMAGE 

SUSCEPTIBILITY INFORMATION TO CONSUMERS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 32302(b) of title 49, United States 

Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘The Secretary, after providing an opportunity for public comment, shall 

study and report to Congress the most useful data, format, and 

method for providing simple and understandable damage susceptibility information to consumers.’’. 

(b) DEADLINE.—The Secretary of Transportation shall carry 

out the last sentence of section 32302(b) of title 49, United States 

Code, as added by subsection (a), not later than the date that 

is 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Approved January 10, 2013. 

49 USC 32302 

note. 

Study. 

Reports. 

49 USC 32302 

note. 

Jan. 10, 2013 

[H.R. 5859] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1091.html[7/22/2015 7:42:40 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-ersu

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1091

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: John Berger

General Comment

I earned it, I can decide what I do with it!
#### § 29.210 How does the Department reject a final offer?

The Department must reject a final offer by providing written notice to the Tribe based on the criteria in § 29.209 no more than 45 days after receipt of a final offer by the Self-Governance Official, or within a longer time period as agreed to by the Department and the Tribe consistent with this subpart. The notice must explain the basis for the rejection of the final offer.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0777.html[7/21/2015 12:22:45 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-9xr8

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0777

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Norma Gurss

General Comment

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest RuleRetirement Investment Advice; Notice of proposed

 rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

I can make my OWN DECISIONS ON MY RETIREMENT PROGRAMS. Thank you very much.