alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         262,674
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  674,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                   107,058
<INVENTORY>                                    186,049
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,037,806
<PP&E>                                       1,709,562
<DEPRECIATION>                                 172,439
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,055,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,516,003
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        216
<COMMON>                                        34,530
<OTHER-SE>                                    (333,670)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,055,788
<SALES>                                      1,949,967
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,949,967
<CGS>                                        1,234,052
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,234,052
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (11,260)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,426
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                196,703
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            196,703
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   196,703
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
§ 270.3 Application. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this part applies to all— ( 1 ) Passenger rail operations that operate intercity or commuter passenger train service on the general railroad system of transportation; and
( 2 ) Passenger rail operations that operate commuter or other short-haul rail passenger train service in a metropolitan or suburban area (as described by 49 U.S.C. 20102(2)), including public authorities operating passenger train service.
( b ) This part does not apply to: ( 1 ) Rapid transit operations in an urban area that are not connected to the general railroad system of transportation;
( 2 ) Tourist, scenic, historic, or excursion operations, whether on or off the general railroad system of transportation;
( 3 ) Operation of private cars, including business/office cars and circus trains; or
( 4 ) Railroads that operate only on track inside an installation that is not part of the general railroad system of transportation (*i.e.,* plant railroads, as defined in § 270.5).
[81 FR 53896, Aug. 12, 2016, as amended at 85 FR 12843, Mar. 4, 2020]
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 935 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 935

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
         coastwise trade and fisheries for the vessel TOKEENA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2001

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
         coastwise trade and fisheries for the vessel TOKEENA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), 
section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and 
sections 12106 and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary 
of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade and 
fisheries for the vessel TOKEENA (State of North Carolina registration 
number N6083BN).
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 24.4**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS** that I, **Bruce DeMars** do hereby appoint John W. Roweand William A. Von Hoene, Jr., or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2008 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to befiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**Bruce DeMars**

**DATE: February 1, 2009**
Editorial Note on Part 389
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 389 appear at 66 FR 49873, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 389.31 Petitions for rulemaking. ( a ) Any interested person may petition the Administrator to establish, amend, interpret, clarify, or withdraw a rule.
( b ) Each petition filed under this section must: ( 1 ) Be submitted in writing by mail to the Administrator, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001 or electronically at *www.regulations.gov ,* using the general petitions for rulemaking docket listed on FMCSA's website at *www.FMCSA.dot.gov .*
( 2 ) Set forth the text or substance of the rule or amendment proposed, or specify the rule that the petitioner seeks to have interpreted, clarified or withdrawn, as the case may be;
( 3 ) Explain the interest of the petitioner in the action requested;
( 4 ) Contain any information, data, research studies, and arguments available to the petitioner to support the action sought.
[85 FR 86849, Dec. 31, 2020, as amended 88 FR 80183, Nov. 17, 2023]
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 173 (Friday, September 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51443-51444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4417]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice; Announcing a Partially Open Meeting 
of the Board of Directors

Time and Date:  The open meeting of the Board of Directors is scheduled 
to begin at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, September 12, 2007. The closed 
portion of the meeting will follow immediately the open portion of the 
meeting.

Place:  Board Room, First Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1625 
Eye Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006.

Status:  The first portion of the meeting will be open to the public. 
The final portion of the meeting will be closed to the public.

Matter to be Considered at the Open Portion: Fiscal Year 2008 Agency 
Budget.

Matter to be Considered at the Closed Portion:  Periodic Update of 
Examination Program Development and Supervisory Findings.

[[Page 51444]]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shelia Willis, Paralegal Specialist, 
Office of General Counsel, at 202-408-2876 or [email protected].

    Dated: September 5, 2007.

    By the Federal Housing Finance Board.
Neil R. Crowley,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-4417 Filed 9-5-07; 3:46 pm]
BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
```
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-18-00325-CV 

________________________

REALTEX CONSTRUCTION, LLC, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

CYNTHIA RICO D/B/A FRAME CO. AND 

OSCAR SALINAS, JR. D/B/A SALINAS CONSTRUCTION, INC., APPELLEES 

 

On Appeal from the 99th District Court 

Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2016-522,243; Honorable J. Blair Cherry, Jr., Presiding 

 

October 18, 2018 

 

ABATEMENT 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ. 

Appellant, Realtex Construction, LLC, appeals from a final judgment in favor of 

Appellees, Cynthia Rico d/b/a Frame Co. and Oscar Salinas, Jr. d/b/a Salinas 

Construction, Inc. On October 17, 2018, Realtex filed a suggestion of bankruptcy with 

the clerk of this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.1. The suggestion provides notice that 
2

Realtex filed a bankruptcy petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western 

District of Texas on October 8, 2018. The bankruptcy proceeding is currently pending as 

case number 18-11300.

Accordingly, this appeal is abated and all appellate deadlines are suspended until 

further order of this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. The parties may file a motion to 

reinstate or sever the appeal if permitted by federal law or the bankruptcy court. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 8.3. The parties shall promptly inform this court of the resolution of the 

bankruptcy proceeding or any other event authorizing reinstatement of the appeal.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0569 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Jennifer S Parker 

Address: 

PO Box 23094 

Seattle, WA, 98102 

Email: jsparkercommunications@yahoo.com 

Phone: 206-913-7428 

General Comment 

p.13, Section 3: Benefits. Thank you for finally making parity happen, as these percentages show 

parity did not exist before, despite the law. 

Also now that visits have lower limits, people with chronic and severe mental health conditions 

such as bipolar and schizophrenia will not exhaust their coverage in about five months as they did 

before. This should reduce people foregoing outpatient treatment and lower likelihood of nonadherence to treatment regimes that produce poor 

outcomes. All of this decreases the potential for increased hospitalization costs and helps ensure 

a better quality of life for these individuals who need ongoing treatment. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: April 29, 2010 

Received: April 02, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ace8e8 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 4/29/2010
From: Phil Schnabel [mailto:hgeorgephil@canby.com] 

Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 3:13 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Its time the Obama administration realized that they cannot administrate every facet of 

American life. The annuity model is working just fine for the agents, the companys and the 

consumers. Keep out of a business that they, the DOL, doesn’t understand. Phil Schnabel, 

independent agent.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 that to the best of her knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Union Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union Bankshares,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


/s/ Marsha A. Mongeon
---------------------
Marsha A. Mongeon
Chief Financial Officer

August 13, 2007

                                      44
§ 38.103 Public information system. ( a ) Each car shall be equipped with an interior public address system permitting transportation system personnel, or recorded or digitized human speech messages, to announce stations and provide other passenger information. Alternative systems or devices which provide equivalent access are also permitted.
( b ) [Reserved]
January 12, 2016 

Dear Mr. Reid: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA−2015−5173). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to process your petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, 

lighter-than-air), and power source for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) 

should include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be 

located in the aircraft manual(s). 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 1/26/16. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267–2999. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

Program Analyst
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 172 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 27, 2001.
Whereas on June 17, 2001, 350 firefighters and numerous police officers 
        responded to a 911 call that sent them to Long Island General Supply 
        Company in Queens, New York;
Whereas a fire and an explosion in a two-story building had turned the 128-year-
        old, family-owned store into a heap of broken bricks, twisted metal, and 
        shattered glass;
Whereas all those who responded to the scene served without reservation and with 
        their personal safety on the line;
Whereas two civilians and dozens of firefighters were injured by the blaze, 
        including firefighters Joseph Vosilla and Brendan Manning who were 
        severely injured;
Whereas John J. Downing of Ladder Company 163, an 11-year veteran of the 
        department and resident of Port Jefferson Station, and a husband and 
        father of two, lost his life in the fire;
Whereas Brian Fahey of Rescue Company 4, a 14-year veteran of the department and 
        resident of East Rockaway, and a husband and father of three, lost his 
        life in the fire; and
Whereas Harry Ford of Rescue Company 4, a 27-year veteran of the department from 
        Long Beach, and a husband and father of three, lost his life in the 
        fire: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors John J. Downing, Brian Fahey, and Harry Ford, who lost 
        their lives in the course of duty as firefighters, and recognizes them 
        for their bravery and sacrifice;
            (2) extends its deepest sympathies to the families of these three 
        brave heroes; and
            (3) pledges its support and to continue to work on behalf of all of 
        the Nation's firefighters who risk their lives every day to ensure the 
        safety of all Americans.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0787.html[7/21/2015 12:33:41 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-ih6g

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0787

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Donald Quimby

General Comment

I'm tired of our government imposing in my life. I can plan my own retirement. Like social security, health care.

 If the government starts interfering. It will be screwed up. The Obama administration needs to go away!!!!!
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 11

- 00305

- CV

JOHN MARGETIS AND MI CHAEL BRISCOE

, Appellant s

v.

CANOPY CONSTRUCTION, LLC, EPSILON

HOLDINGS, LP, GZH EN TERPRISES, INC.,

ANDREW HEAPE, TREY G IBSON AND NICK ZINDE L

, Appellee s

From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 82353

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, John Margetis and Michael Briscoe, have filed a motion to dismiss

their appeal of the trial court’s summary

- judgment order. 1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

Dismissal of this appeal would not prevent a party from seeking relief to which it

would otherwise be entitled. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

1 Margetis and Briscoe have styled their motion as a “Motion to Withdraw”; however, we

construe the motion to be a motion to dismiss.Margetis v. Canopy Construction, LLC Page 2 AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justi ce Scoggins

Motion granted; appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed March 21, 2012

[CV06]
Exhibit 3





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin L. Cornwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.














/s/ Kevin L. Cornwell


Kevin L. Cornwell


Chief Executive Officer


November 4, 2010








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 29.910 What is the Department's burden of proof for appeals of pre-award decisions?

The Department must demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence the validity of a pre-award decision, and that the decision is consistent with 23 U.S.C. 207.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 78]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ078.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 2043]]

Public Law 109-78
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To extend the waiver authority of the Secretary of Education with 
 respect to student financial assistance during a war or other military 
    operation or national emergency. <<NOTE: Sept. 30, 2005 -  [H.R. 
                                2132]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY.

    Section 6 of the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students 
Act of 2003 (20 U.S.C. 1070, note) is amended by striking ``September 
30, 2005'' and inserting ``September 30, 2007''.

    Approved September 30, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2132:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Sept. 20, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 27, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
[Civ. No. 13217.

Second Dist., Div. One.

Aug. 26, 1941.]

#### JOSEPH M. BERNSTEIN, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent.

Joseph M. Bernstein, *in pro. per.,*for Petitioner.

DESMOND, J.,

*pro tem.*— Petitioner seeks a writ of *certiorari,*questioning the legality of proceedings by which his wife was appointed guardian of his California estate upon her petition filed in August, 1935, alleging that he was an incompetent person. Eeferring to said petition, we find that representations were made therein that petitioner herein was incompetent because of disease, consisting of various physical ailments, and not because of any weakness of mind.

Petitioner fails to show that he did not receive notice of the petition under which his wife was appointed guardian of his estate, and fails to show that he did not have timely knowledge of the action taken on said petition. It appears from a petition of his daughter now pending in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, in which she seeks to succeed his wife as guardian upon her resigning from that position, that the California estate of petitioner has consisted of a monthly income amounting to $120 per month. This amount has been contributed by various insurance companies, and the income, according to the daughter’s representation, not challenged by the petitioner, has been used and is being used to provide for the support and maintenance of his wife and himself.  *569It appears that this petitioner, while in full possession of his mental faculties and in receipt of the benefit of his estate, has waited for almost six years to initiate this proceeding. In this he has been guilty of laches, and his conduct, since the making of the order complained of, amounts to a consent thereto. (See 4 Cal. Jur., p. 1061, “Discretion in Granting” [the writ of certiorari], and p. 1062, “Laches.”) The citation furnished by petitioner in support of his petition, namely *Grinbaum*v. *Superior Court,*192 Cal. 528 [221 Pac. 635], is not in point, for two reasons. First, the court in that ease failed to order notice sent to the alleged incompetent, and second, it appeared that she had been legally adjudged insane, and in that condition could not be bound by the principles of waiver or estoppel.'

In the proceeding now pending in the probate court in which the daughter of petitioner seeks to succeed her mother as guardian of his estate, this petitioner will have an opportunity, if he wishes, to present testimony to the effect that he is no longer suffering from any disability by reason of his condition.

The petition for a writ of *certiorari*is ordered denied.

York, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

Petitioner’s application for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied October 23, 1941.