alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 134 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 21
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 134

                          [Report No. 107-58]

  Providing for recommittal of the conference report to accompany the 
concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 83) establishing the congressional 
budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2002, revising 
 the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal 
 year 2001, and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for each of 
                    fiscal years 2003 through 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2001

     Mr. Goss, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for recommittal of the conference report to accompany the 
concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 83) establishing the congressional 
budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2002, revising 
 the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal 
 year 2001, and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for each of 
                    fiscal years 2003 through 2011.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution the conference 
report to accompany the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 83) 
establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government 
for fiscal year 2002, revising the congressional budget for the United 
States Government for fiscal year 2001, and setting forth appropriate 
budgetary levels for each of fiscal years 2003 through 2011 is hereby 
recommitted to the committee of conference.

                                                  House Calendar No. 21

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 134

                          [Report No. 107-58]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for recommittal of the conference report to accompany the 
concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 83) establishing the congressional 
budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2002, revising 
 the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal 
 year 2001, and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for each of 
                    fiscal years 2003 through 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 8, 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: jackpegped@CenturyLink.com [mailto:jackpegped@CenturyLink.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 4:18 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Peggy Peddicord 

810 S. Russell Street 

Odessa, MO 64076
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
  



Exhibit 10.1.4  


 
 

Exhibit A
  
    SCHEDULE OF PARTNERS,
  ALLOCATION OF PARTNERSHIP UNITS, PERCENTAGE INTERESTS
  AND THE AGREED UPON VALUE OF NON-CASH CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS    
    



	Date Admitted
 
	 	Name and address of partners
	 	Value of non-

cash capital

contribution
	 	Partnership

units issued
	 	Approx.

Percentage

Interests
	 	Federal ID #

	05/22/1998	 	Eagle Ridge Lease Company LLC

16100 N. Greenway-Hayden Loop

Scottsdale, AZ 85260	 	$	1,198,750	 	35,794	 	0.45	%	52-2099405
	

02/04/1997	
 	

GTA LP, Inc. 14 North Adger's

Wharf Charleston, SC 29401	
 	
$	

—	
 	

7,868,789	
 	

99.34	
%	

58-2290326
	

02/04/1997	
 	

GTA GP, Inc. 14 North Adger's

Wharf Charleston, SC 29401	
 	
$	

—	
 	

16,154	
 	

0.20	
%	

58-2290217
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
	 	
	 	 
	

Total Common OP Units	
 	
 	

 	
 	

7,920,737	
 	

100.00	
%	

 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
	 	
	 	 
	 	 	GTA LP, Inc.

14 North Adger's Wharf

Charleston, SC 29401	 	$	20,000,000	 	800,000	 	100	%	 




1









QuickLinks


Exhibit A SCHEDULE OF PARTNERS, ALLOCATION OF PARTNERSHIP UNITS, PERCENTAGE INTERESTS AND THE AGREED UPON VALUE OF NON-CASH CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS
1210-AB32-2-1190.html[7/24/2015 7:25:00 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvr-n6lg

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1684

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I can plan for my own retirement. Thank you
EXHIBIT
31.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I, W.
Page Ogden, hereby certify that:








1.  I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Britton & Koontz Capital
Corporation;




2.  Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;




4.  The registrant’s other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The registrant’s other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the
audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.











Date:
            November
      13, 2009
            /s/
      W. Page OgdenW.
      Page OgdenChief
      Executive Officer
§ 246.5 Effect and construction. ( a ) FRA does not intend, by use of the term signal employee in this part, to alter the terms, conditions, or interpretation of existing collective bargaining agreements that employ other job classification titles when identifying a person who is engaged in installing, troubleshooting, testing, repair, or maintenance of railroad signal systems and signal-related technology.
( b ) FRA does not intend by issuance of these regulations to alter the authority of a railroad to initiate disciplinary sanctions against its employees, including managers and supervisors, in the normal and customary manner, including those contained in its collective bargaining agreements.
( c ) Except as provided in § 246.213, nothing in this part shall be construed to create or prohibit an eligibility or entitlement to employment in other service for the railroad as a result of denial, suspension, or revocation of certification under this part.
( d ) Nothing in this part shall be deemed to abridge any additional procedural rights or remedies not inconsistent with this part that are available to the employee under a collective bargaining agreement, the Railway Labor Act, or (with respect to employment at will) at common law with respect to removal from service or other adverse action taken as a consequence of this part.
#### Joseph T. McMahon, Appellant, *v.*Cynthia E. Smith, Individually and as Executrix and Trustee under the Will of Josiah T. Smith, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

*McMahon*v. Smith, 136 App. Div. 839, appeal dismissed.

(Argued May 29, 1911;

decided June 6, 1911.)

Motion for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 11, 1910, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and granting a new trial in an action to recover broker’s commissions.

The motion was made upon the ground that the Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

*George W. McKenzie*for motion.

*Louis Ehrenberg*opposed.

Motion denied and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
Exhibit 31.2

I, Richard O. Faria, certify that: 

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Scientific Technologies Incorporated;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): 

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and 

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:        May 15, 2006
/s/ Richard Faria
#### James B. Irwin *v.*Denis J. O’Connor and another.

Judgment

. modified as to defendant Annie A. O’Connor by directing a dismissal of the complaint in her favor, without costs, and the final judgment as to Denis J. O’Connor reversed and the case referred to another referee to take proof and make the computation required under the contract of the parties; no costs to either party. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/20/15 3:01 PM

Received: July 20, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k33-1uqc

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2541

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

Organization: First Heartland Companies

General Comment

We are concerned that the current proposal is unworkable and aimed at those who already seek 

to act in the best interests of clients. The proposal contains provisions that will have the 

unintended consequence of leaving many retirement savers without access to professional 

education, advice and service as hardworking, ethically sound advisers will not want want to be 

subject to this type of liability just to earn a living in their chosen profession.

American investors need reliable education, affordable retirement advice and clear and easily 

understood disclosures. While it seems that the easier path is to subject our industry to these 

broad sweeping regulations aimed at routing out "unseemly" or "bad actors", this proposal will 

have the opposite effect. It will prevent competent, ethical advisers from servicing any type of 

retirement account while at the same time having absolutely no effect on the "bad actors" 

currently operating withing our industry.

Unfortunately, the current draft (i) subjects small IRA account holders who typically buy and sell 

mutual fund products to a fee-based model as opposed to receiving advice from an adviser who 

receives an upfront commission and/or 12b-1 fees, perhaps on a one-time basis; (ii) prohibits an 

adviser from providing advice to plan sponsors under a commission arrangement; (iii) narrowly 
defines investment education, which will limit the assistance advisers can provide without 

triggering fiduciary obligations; (iv) does not allow advisers to receive third party compensation 

when advising plan participants on distribution options; (v) creates an inoperable Best Interest 

Contract Exemption which prohibits compensation such as commissions and 12b-1 fees unless 

advisers and firms comply with its complicated, confusing, and costly provisions, not to mention 

subjecting advisers and their firms to potential litigation; and (vi) limits investment options 

available to plan participants and IRA owners.

We urge the Department of Labor to either redraft or abandon this unworkable rule which has the 

ability to severely diminish access to competent, ethical advice merely due to the manner in 

which an adviser is compensated.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 241

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the tax-exempt

status of Christa McAuliffe Fellowships.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. EMERSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend

the tax-exempt status of Christa McAuliffe Fellowships.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) section 117 of the Internal Revenue Code of

4 1986 (relating to qualified scholarships) is amended by

5 adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:

6 ‘‘(e) CHRISTA McAULIFFE FELLOWSHIPS.—In the

7 case of an individual who is a Christa McAuliffe Fellow

8 (as defined in section 561(b) of the Higher Education Act

9 of 1965) and is awarded a fellowship pursuant to section
2

•HR 241 IH

1 561 of such Act, gross income shall not include any

2 amount of such fellowship award—

3 ‘‘(1) which is expended for a project approved

4 by the Secretary of Education pursuant to section

5 563(b) of such Act, and

6 ‘‘(2) which is not expended directly or indirectly

7 for the personal use or benefit of such individual.’’

8 (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall

9 apply to amounts received on or after July 1, 1990, in

10 taxable years ending on or after such date.

Æ
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSurface pitting fatigue life of noninvolute, low-contact-ratio gearsSpur gear endurance tests were conducted to investigate the surface pitting fatigue life of noninvolute gears with low numbers of teeth and low contact ratios for use in advanced applications. The results were compared with those for a standard involute design with a low number of teeth. The gear pitch diameter was 8.89 cm (3.50 in.) with 12 teeth on both gear designs. Test conditions were an oil inlet temperature of 320 K (116 F), an oil outlet temperature of 350 K (170 F), a maximum Hertz stress of 1.49 GPa (216 ksi), and a speed of 10 000 rpm. The following results were obtained: the noninvolute gear had a surface pitting fatigue life approximately 1.6 times that of the standard involute gear of a similar design; and the surface pitting fatigue life of the 3.43-pitch AISI 8620 noninvolute gear was approximately equal to the surface pitting fatigue life of an 8-pitch, 28-tooth AISI 9310 gear at the same load but at a considerably higher maximum Hertz stress.Document ID19900013474Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsTownsend, Dennis P.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberAVSCOM-TM-90-C-008AIAA PAPER 90-2153E-5440NASA-TM-103116NAS 1.15:103116Meeting InformationMeeting: Joint Propulsion ConferenceLocation: Orlando, FLCountry: United StatesStart Date: July 16, 1990End Date: July 18, 1990Sponsors:SAE,ASME,AIAA,ASEEAccession Number90N22790Funding Number(s)PROJECT: DA PROJ. 1L1-62209-A4-7APROJECT: RTOP 505-63-51Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013474.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Paul W. Stringer, certify that:  

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly reporton Form 10-Q of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.       The registrant's other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

(b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)     disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that incurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting; and 

5.       The registrant's other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant's board of directors (or persons fulfilling theequivalent functions): 

(a)     all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal controls over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2003

/s/      Paul W. Stringer                               

Paul W. Stringer