alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711



## OCT 3 0 

## 2009 OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND STANDARDS Mr. Matthew Baker Director

- Monitoring Operations Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality P.O. Box 13087 Austin, TX 78711-3087 Dear Mr. Baker: This letter transmits the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) approval ofthe PAMS networkplan for the state ofTexas dated July 1,2009, as required according to the Ambient AirMonitoring Regulations. Per 40 CFR 58.11 (c), the PAMS monitoring network design and changes are subject to the approval ofthe Administrator, which has been delegated to the Director ofthe Air Quality Assessment Division in EPA's Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS). To inform the approval process, we worked with your Regional Office on a review of your plan. We found that the plan meets or exceeds the minimum PAMS monitoring requirements contained in Appendix D of40 CFR part 58. After careful consideration, we are pleased to approve your PAMS monitoring plan. I want to thank you and your stafffor all the work you have put into developing the PAMS monitoring plan. For any questions, please contact Kevin Cavender ofmy staffat cavender.kevin@epa.gov, or 919-541-2364.

Richard A. Wayland Director Air Quality Assessment Division

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov RecycledJRecyclable • Printed wRh Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 25% Postconsumer)cc: Amir Pousamadi, Texas CEQ Kristin Bourdon, Texas CEQ MariaMartinez, EPAlRegion 6 MarkSather, EPAlRegion 6 Regina Krystyn, EPAlRegion 6 Lewis Weinstock, EPA/OAQPS Kevin Cavender, EPA/OAQPS
From: jkoester99@q.com [mailto:jkoester99@q.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:32 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Medical benefits

Dear Department of Labor: 

 

You requested comments on mental health benefits. I am encouraged to see that 

mental health benefits will be treated the same as health benefits for physical 

problems. If someone has a physical problem they are not told "you can see the 

doctor three times and then we will reevaluate." That is what the mental health 

recipient is told. Yes, there are things that can be treated in three sessions and yet 

it is not the norm. People are not so eager to go to counseling that they come in 

without a legitimate problem. So, now their legitimate problems will receive 

treatment. 

 

Thank you, 

 

JoAnn Koester, LCPC
1210-AB32-2-1317.html[7/26/2015 1:24:19 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvw-2rcy

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1812

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: bernard ransom

Address:

2102 Burns Lane

Camden, SC, 29020

Email: barneyransom@yahoo.com

Phone: 8037134347

General Comment

I AM CAPABLE OF HANDLING MY OWN RETIREMENT FUNDS. PLEASE LEAVE ME ALONE. THE

 LAST

THING I NEED IS MORE GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 11

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that oversight hearings

should be held immediately to determine the causes and outcomes surrounding this influenza season’s vaccine shortage.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. CONDIT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Energy and Commerce

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

oversight hearings should be held immediately to determine the causes and outcomes surrounding this influenza

season’s vaccine shortage.

Whereas the United States has been faced with a shortage

of influenza vaccine from manufacturers during this influenza season;

Whereas influenza vaccine is the best preventative measure

against influenza;

Whereas the most at risk populations were not immunized at

the optimal time (early October), as recommended by

health officials;
2

•HRES 11 IH

Whereas influenza seasons are unpredictable and can be devastating to the health and well-being of all populations,

regardless of age;

Whereas all influenza vaccines are privately manufactured;

Whereas opportunity exists for distributors of influenza vaccine to reap large profits in times of shortage by servicing the highest bidder before their contractual agreements or those most in need;

Whereas the State of California contracted with General

Injectables and Vaccines on February 24, 2000, for

700,000 doses of influenza vaccine at $17.99 per vial

with expectations of receiving its entire shipment by September 15, 2000, but did not receive the balance until

the end of November 2000;

Whereas the State of Maine contracted with General

Injectables and Vaccines in late June 2000 for 123,000

doses of influenza vaccine at $31.00 and $39.00 per vial

and received its entire order by early September 2000;

and

Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has

implored distributors of influenza vaccine to send their

product to those most in need per CDC guidelines: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that oversight hearings should be convened

3 immediately to determine—

4 (1) the course of action followed by distributors

5 of influenza vaccine during this influenza season;
3

•HRES 11 IH

1 (2) whether or not such distributors put profit

2 ahead of the health and well-being of the American

3 people; and

4 (3) whether it is necessary to take measures to

5 ensure the safe, adequate, and timely supply of in6 fluenza vaccines in the future.

Æ
§ 271.503 External audit improvement plans. ( a ) *Submission.* Within 60 days of receiving FRA's written notice of the audit results, if necessary, a railroad shall submit for approval an improvement plan addressing any instances of deficiency or non-compliance found in the audit to the FRA Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety and Chief Safety Officer, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
( b ) *Requirements.* At a minimum, an improvement plan shall: ( 1 ) Describe the improvements the railroad will implement to address the audit findings;
( 2 ) Identify by position title the individual(s) responsible for carrying out the improvements necessary to address the audit findings; and
( 3 ) Contain a timeline describing when milestones for implementing the recommended improvements will be achieved. These implementation milestones shall be specific and measurable.
( c ) *Approval.* If FRA does not approve the railroad's improvement plan, FRA will notify the railroad of the plan's specific deficiencies. The railroad shall amend the proposed plan to correct the identified deficiencies and provide FRA a corrected copy no later than 30 days following receipt of FRA's notice that the proposed plan was not approved.
( d ) *Status reports.* Upon the request of the FRA Associate Administrator, a railroad shall provide FRA for review a status report on the implementation of the improvements contained in the improvement plan.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 3.02

                        CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE

                         ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF

                         SILICON VALLEY RESEARCH, INC.


  The undersigned, James O. Benouis and Laurence G. Colegate, Jr., hereby
certify that:

  1.    They are the duly elected and acting Chief Executive Officer and Senior
Vice President of Finance and Administration/Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of Silicon Valley Research, Inc. a California corporation.

  2.    Article Third of the Corporation's Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation which presently reads as follows:

  Third:  This corporation is authorized to issue two classes of shares
          designated respectively "Common Stock" and "Preferred Stock", and
          referred to herein either as Common Stock or Common shares and
          Preferred Stock or Preferred shares, respectively.  The number of
          shares of Common Stock is 40,000,000, without par value and the number
          of shares of Preferred Stock is 1,000,000 without par value.

is amended to read as follows:

          This corporation is authorized to issue two classes of shares
          designated respectively "Common Stock" and "Preferred Stock", and
          referred to herein either as Common Stock or Common shares and
          Preferred Stock or Preferred shares, respectively. The number of
          shares of Common Stock is 60,000,000, without par value and the number
          of shares of Preferred Stock is 1,000,000 without par value.

  3.  The foregoing amendment of the Articles of Incorporation has been duly
approved by the Board of Directors of this corporation.

  4.  The foregoing amendment of the Articles of Incorporation has been duly
approved by the required vote of the shareholders of this corporation in
accordance with section 902 of the California Corporations Code.  The total
number of outstanding shares of this corporation 
<PAGE>
 
entitled to vote with respect to the foregoing amendments was 26,190,113 shares
of common stock. There are no outstanding shares of Preferred Stock. The number
of shares voting in favor of the amendment equaled or exceeded the vote
required, such required vote being more than 50% of the outstanding shares of
common stock.

  The undersigned declare under penalty of perjury that the matters set forth in
the foregoing certificate are true of his own knowledge.

  Executed at San Jose, California on the 7 day of October 1998.


                                    /s/James O. Benouis
                                    ---------------------
                                    James O. Benouis, Chief Executive Officer



                                    /s/Laurence G. Colegate, Jr.
                                    ------------------------------
                                    Laurence G. Colegate, Jr., Senior Vice
                                    President of Finance and Administration 
                                    and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 37.79 Purchase or lease of new rail vehicles by public entities operating rapid or light rail systems.

Each public entity operating a rapid or light rail system making a solicitation after August 25, 1990, to purchase or lease a new rapid or light rail vehicle for use on the system shall ensure that the vehicle is readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs.
Exhibit
10.5





January 16,
2007





Mr.
Richard R. Grigg








Dear
Dick,





Based
on our discussions we have mutually agreed to extend the expiration date of your
July 20, 2004 agreement (“Agreement”) from August 20, 2007, to March 31, 2008.
Each party shall maintain the ability to terminate the Agreement for any reason
upon written notice given sixty days in advance.





In
consideration of the foregoing, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged
by the parties, paragraph two under subsection (e) of your Agreement shall be
amended to read as follows, with all other terms remaining as
written:





Your
eligibility to participate in the health care and group life insurance coverages
under the Flexible Benefits Plan will begin January 1, 2007. Moreover, at the
conclusion of your employment with the Company, you will be granted the maximum
credit (currently 85 points) for purposes of determining the company
contribution toward the cost of retiree health care coverage under the Flexible
Benefits Plan or any successor plan, so long as retiree health care is provided
under the Flexible Benefits Plan and a company contribution is provided to other
senior executive officers of FirstEnergy.





In the
event of your death as an active employee, health care coverage for your
surviving spouse will be obtained and provided at substantially the same
coverage level and participant contribution level as available to active
employees through March 31, 2008. Thereafter, health care coverage would be
provided to your surviving spouse on the same terms and conditions as provided
to other surviving spouses under the terms of the Flexible Benefits
Plan.





In
addition, subsection (i) of your Agreement shall be amended to read as follows,
with all other terms remaining as written:





You
will be entitled to the financial planning benefits available to other senior
executive officers during your employment with the Company, and will be entitled
to continue to receive the financial planning benefits for one (1) year
following the date of your retirement.





If the
above is agreeable to you, please sign where indicated and return a copy to me
for our records. You should retain a copy for yourself. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call.






Sincerely,Anthony J. AlexanderSo Agreed:
      ________________________________Date:______________________________________
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Foremost Corporation of America
Grand Rapids, Michigan

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated
February 12, 1999, relating to the consolidated financial statements and
schedules of Foremost Corporation of America appearing in the Company's
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, in that
Corporation's previously filed Form S-8 Registration Statements File No.
33-96692 and 33-96694.


BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
----------------
BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
March 15, 1999
Grand Rapids, Michigan
§ 31.9 Answer. ( a ) The defendant may request a hearing by serving an answer on the reviewing official within 30 days of service of the complaint. Service of an answer shall be made by delivering a copy to the reviewing official or by placing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid and addressed to the reviewing official. Service of an answer is complete upon such delivery or mailing. An answer shall be deemed to be a request for hearing.
( b ) In the answer, the defendant— ( 1 ) Shall admit or deny each of the allegations of liability made in the complaint;
( 2 ) Shall state any defense on which the defendant intends to rely;
( 3 ) May state any reasons why the defendant contends that the penalties and assessments should be less than the statutory maximum; and
( 4 ) Shall state the name, address, and telephone number of the person authorized by the defendant to act as defendant's representative, if any.
( c ) If the defendant is unable to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section within the time provided, the defendant may, before the expiration of 30 days from service of the complaint, serve on the reviewing official a general answer denying liability and requesting a hearing, and a request for an extension of time within which to serve an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. The reviewing official shall file promptly the complaint, the general answer denying liability, and the request for an extension of time as provided in § 31.11. For good cause shown, the ALJ may grant the defendant up to 30 additional days from the original due date within which to serve an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
|EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Edmund F. Ryan, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Edmund F. Ryan              
Edmund F. Ryan
Acting Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Central Vermont Public Service Corporation ("CVPS") and will be retained by CVPS and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit32**

** **

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF PALMETTO BANCSHARES, INC.PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

 

Theundersigned, as the chief executive officer and chief accounting officer ofPalmetto Bancshares, Inc., certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ended June 30, 2006, which accompanies this certification, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in theperiodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. at the datesand for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and no purchaser orseller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon theforegoing certification for any purpose.  The undersigned expressly disclaimsany obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

 

/s/      L. Leon Patterson                           L. Leon Patterson Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

/s/      Paul W. Stringer                                               Paul W. Stringer President and Chief Operating Officer(Chief Accounting Officer)

Dated:  August 9, 2006
#### Harry Frankel, Administrator of the Estate of Stanley Frankel, Deceased, v. Sussex Poultry Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

*265
      *(February*24, 1950.)

Carey, J., sitting.

*Everett F. Warrington*for plaintiff.

*Howard W. Bramhall*for defendant.

Superior Court for Sussex County,

No. 190,

Civil Action, 1948.

*266Carey, Judge.

This opinion is concerned only with interrogatories numbers one and three. Concerning the others, it will suffice to say that, in my opinion, they seek information pertinent to the issue or reasonably likely to lead to the discovery of relevant testimony. As to them, plaintiff’s motion will be denied.

The defendant questions the adequacy of plaintiff’s motion on the ground that it is too general. It is better practice to state specifically the reasons why interrogatories are considered improper rather than merely to aver that they are improper. *Boysell Co.*v. *Hale, (D. C.)*30 *F. Supp.*255. In the present case, however, several reasons make it desirable that I consider the objection made, notwithstanding its general nature.

Certain Federal cases hold that a party is entitled to learn the names of his opponent’s witnesses before trial. *Roth*v. *Paramount Film Distributing*Corporation, *(D. C.)*4 *F. R. D.*302; *Whitkop*v. *Baldwin, (D. C.) 1 F. R. D.*169; *Kingsway*Press, *Inc.,*v. *Farrell Pub. Corp., (D. C.)*30 *F. Supp.*775; *Penn*v. *Automobile Ins. Co., (D. C.) 27 F. Supp.*336. Careful reading of these cases discloses that in some of them the Court was using the word “witnesses” not in the sense of trial witnesses but in the sense of eyewitnesses. This fact is pointed out in *McNamara v. Erschen, (D. C.)*8 *F. R. D.*427.

In any event, for the reasons given by Judge Rodney in the McNamara case, the ruling of cases like *Cogdill*v. *Tennessee Valley Authority, (D. C.) 7 F. R. D.*411; *Coca-Cola Co. v. Dixie-Cola Laboratories, Inc., (D. C.)*30 *F. Supp.*275; *McNamara*v. *Erschen, supra; Aktiebolaget Vargos v. Clark, (D. C.)*8 *F. R. D.*635, will be adopted here. A party is not entitled to the names of *267persons whom his adversary expects to use as witnesses in the trial, although he is usually entitled to the names of persons known to his adversary as having some knowledge of pertinent facts. Actually calling, or failing to call, any certain witness or witnesses at the trial is nothing more than trial strategy; the liberal rules generally permitting discovery of all admissible evidence, or information leading thereto, do not compel the prior revelation of an opponent’s planned strategy in presenting his evidence.

Interrogatories Numbers 1 and 3 are clearly improper under the foregoing rule and are not required to be answered by plaintiff. An order to this effect may be submitted.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1401.html[7/23/2015 9:25:26 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvn-cfr0

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1401

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I will plan for and manage my own retirement.

I do not need the government involved in any other 

Area of my life.
#### § 371.121 What penalties may FMCSA impose for violations of this part?

The penalty provisions of 49 U.S.C. chapter 149, *Civil and Criminal Penalties* apply to this subpart. These penalties do not overlap. Notwithstanding these civil penalties, nothing in this section deprives an individual shipper of any remedy or right of action under existing law.