alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Mary Jane Johnson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Comprehensive Care Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
Editorial Note on Part 384
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 384 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 384.208 Notification of disqualification. ( a ) No later than 10 days after disqualifying a CLP or CDL holder licensed by another State or other jurisdiction of domicile, or disqualifying an out-of-State CLP or CDL holder's privilege to operate a commercial motor vehicle for at least 60 days, the State must notify the State or jurisdiction that issued the license of the disqualification via CDLIS.
( b ) The notification must include both the disqualification and the violation that resulted in the disqualification, revocation, suspension, or cancellation. The notification and the information it provides must be recorded on the CDLIS driver record.
[67 FR 49761, July 31, 2002, as amended at 73 FR 73125, Dec. 1, 2008; 76 FR 26894, May 9, 2011; 86 FR 38940, July 23, 2021; 88 FR 80182, Nov. 17, 2023]
1210-AB32-2-1103.html[7/24/2015 5:52:35 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-mbjc

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1597

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I will plan my own retirement; big government has no business in this matter.
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.401 What is the purpose and scope of this subpart? ( a ) This subpart contains the requirements for obtaining and maintaining a safety permit to transport certain hazardous materials. No one may transport the materials listed in § 385.403 without a safety permit required by this subpart.
( b ) This subpart includes: ( 1 ) Definitions of terms used in this subpart;
( 2 ) The list of hazardous materials that require a safety permit if transported in commerce;
( 3 ) The requirements and procedures a carrier must follow in order to be issued a safety permit and maintain a safety permit;
( 4 ) The procedures for a motor carrier to follow to initiate an administrative review of a denial, suspension, or revocation of a safety permit.
#### Gansevoort Bank, Appellant, *v.*Empire State Surety Company, Respondent.

*Gansevoort Bank v. Empire State Surety Co.,*136 App. Div. 939, affirmed.

(Submitted April 6, 1911;

decided April 25, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 21, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover on a bond given as security for the payment of a promissory note.

*J. Campbell Thompson*for appellant.

*Benjamin Reass*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. .

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscooic, Chase and Collin, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 52196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4476]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Research, Engineering and Development Advisory Committee

    Pursuant to section 10(A)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2) notice is hereby given of a meeting 
of the FAA Research, Engineering and Development (R,E&D) Advisory 
Committee.
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Name: Research, Engineering & Development Advisory Committee.
    Time and Date: October 3, 2007--9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, 
SW., Round Room (10th Floor), Washington, DC 20591.
    Purpose: The meeting agenda will include receiving from the 
Committee guidance for FAA's research and development investments in 
the areas of air traffic services, airports, aircraft safety, human 
factors and environment and energy. The Weather Working Group will also 
present a report for approval. Attendance is open to the interested 
public but seating is limited. Persons wishing to attend the meeting or 
obtain information should contact Gloria Dunderman at (202) 267-8937 or 
[email protected]. Attendees will have to present picture ID at 
the security desk and escorted to the Round Room.
    Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
Committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC on September 6, 2007.
Paul Krois,
Group Manager, Planning and Coordination Group.
[FR Doc. 07-4476 Filed 9-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-51132

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROMALDO CAMPOS-MENDOZA, also known as Jesus

Granados-Hernandez, also known as Daniel Garcia, Jr.,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CR-489-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Romaldo CamposMendoza raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a

prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10.14


                       AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     AMENDMENT to the Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement"), dated
April 1, 2005, between Refac Optical Group (formerly known as Refac and referred
to hereunder as "Refac") and Raymond A. Cardonne, Jr. ("CARDONNE").


                              W I T N E S S E T H:
                              - - - - - - - - - -


     WHEREAS, CARDONNE is currently employed by REFAC pursuant to the Employment
Agreement; and

     WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to extend the term of the Employment
Agreement from December 31, 2006 to December 31, 2007 and increase the base
salary from $200,000 to $250,000:

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the respective
agreements of the parties herein contained, the parties hereto, intending to be
legally bound, agree as follows:

     1.   Article 2 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to provide
that the term of CARDONNE'S Employment Agreement will end on December 31, 2007.
Article 2, as amended hereby, reads in its entirety as follows:

          2.   Term.  The employment of CARDONNE by REFAC hereunder will
     continue until December 31, 2007, unless further extended by agreement of
     CARDONNE and REFAC or until sooner terminated as hereinafter provided.


     2.   Article 5(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to provide
that CARDONNE'S base salary will be $250,000 from January 1, 2006 for the
duration of the Term of the Employment Agreement.  Article 5(a), as amended
hereby, reads in its entirety as follows:

          5.   Base Salary and Incentive Compensation.

               (a)   Base Salary. During the Employment Period, CARDONNE's
        salary will be $250,000 per annum ("Base Salary"). Payment of such
        salary will be made in accordance with REFAC's customary pay practices
        for senior officers and will be subject to such payroll deductions as
        are required by law or by the terms of any applicable benefit plan of
        REFAC.


     All of the remaining terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall
be unaffected and shall remain in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to the
Employment Agreement.


                                                /s/ Raymond A. Cardonne Jr.
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Raymond A. Cardonne, Jr.

                                                Dated: March 30, 2006



                                                REFAC OPTICAL GROUP


                                            By: /s/ Robert L. Tuchman
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Robert L. Tuchman
                                                Senior Vice President

                                                Dated: March 30, 2006
<PAGE>

Exhibit 11.1

<TABLE>
                                      COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<CAPTION>
                                                        Three Months Ended              Six Months Ended
                                                             June 30,                       June 30,
                                                    -------------------------      -------------------------
                                                        2002          2001             2002          2001
                                                    -----------    ----------      -----------    ----------
                                                         (In thousands, except share and per share data)
<S>                                                 <C>            <C>             <C>            <C>
Average common shares outstanding...........         15,698,542     8,912,501       15,538,832     8,868,572
Average common stock equivalents of
   options outstanding - based on the
   treasury stock method using market
   price....................................            391,405        65,199          343,356        63,803
                                                    -----------    ----------      -----------    ----------
Average diluted common shares outstanding...         16,088,947     8,977,700       15,882,188     8,932,375
                                                    ===========    ==========      ===========    ==========

Net income..................................        $     5,080    $    2,804      $     9,710    $    5,365

Basic earnings per common share.............               0.32          0.31             0.62          0.60

Diluted earnings per common share...........               0.32          0.31             0.61          0.60
</TABLE>



                                     28
H. Res. 24

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 31, 2001.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of 

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION: Mr. Ehlers,

Mr. Mica, Mr. Linder, Mr. Doolittle, and Mr. Reynolds.

Attest:

Clerk.
Afghans, Coalition work to avert 'insider’ attacks
 By Karen Parrish , American Forces Press Service
  WASHINGTON (March 28, 2012) — Afghan and coalition leaders are working to limit “insider threat” killings in Afghanistan, the commander of U.S. and NATO forces there told reporters here today. Marine Corps Gen. John R. Allen said at a Pentagon news conference that Afghan and coalition forces have changed their operations to address the killing of coalition members by Afghan soldiers or police forces, also known as “green-on-blue” events. Fifteen coalition members have been killed in such events this year. “I think you’re aware that tragically we had one overnight, as two young British soldiers were killed in Helmand province,” Allen said. Afghan leaders have put in place an eight-step vetting process, Allen said, and have placed counterintelligence operatives in army and police schools, recruiting centers and within the ranks “to spot and assess the potential emergence of an individual who could be an extremist or, in fact, a Taliban infiltrator.” The general said some breakthroughs have taken place, as Afghan investigators have arrested people in uniform who potentially could have been perpetrators of “green-on-blue” violence. “So the process is actually working,” he added. Allen said he has directed International Security Assistance Force troop-contributing nations to increase training for their deploying forces. ISAF troops, he added, have changed sleeping, basing and guard arrangements to better-protect coalition troops. “Between what the Afghans have done for themselves, what we’re doing for ourselves and how we’re partnering together, we seek to reduce this tragedy to the maximum extent possible,” he said. While the Taliban take credit for all such attacks, Allen said, the majority are not a direct result of Taliban infiltration. But it’s no secret that the Taliban have for some time tried to infiltrate Afghan forces and elements that support Afghan and coalition forces directly, he noted. In most cases, the relationship between Afghan and coalition troops is strong, the general said. Still, he acknowledged, the attacks are one characteristic of counterinsurgency campaigns. “We experienced these in Iraq, [and] we experienced them in Vietnam,” Allen said. “On any occasion where you’re dealing with an insurgency and where you’re also growing an indigenous force – which will ultimately be the principal opposition to that insurgency – the enemy’s [going to] do all that they can to disrupt the counterinsurgency operations, but also disrupt the integrity of the indigenous forces that develop.”
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, September 25, 1995 (120), Para 120.3 Communications]
[Page 1450]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.120.3  communications

  Executive and other communications, pursuant to clause 2, rule XXIV, 
were referred as follows:

       1456. A letter from the General Counsel, Department of the 
     Treasury, transmitting a copy of a draft bill entitled the 
     ``Gold Bullion Coin Amendments of 1995''; to the Committee on 
     Banking and Financial Services.
       1457. A letter from the Assistant Secretary for Legislative 
     Affairs, Department of State, transmitting a copy of 
     Presidential Determination No. 95-43: Drawdown of Commodities 
     and Services from the Department of the Treasury to support 
     the continued presence and activities of United States 
     members of the EU/OSCE Sanctions Assistance Missions on the 
     borders of Serbia and Montenegro, pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 
     2348a; to the Committee on International Relations.
       1458. A letter from the Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty 
     Affairs, Department of State, transmitting copies of 
     international agreements, other than treaties, entered into 
     by the United States, pursuant to 1 U.S.C. 112b(a); to the 
     Committee on International Relations.
       1459. A letter from the Assistant Secretary for Legislative 
     Affairs, Department of State, transmitting a copy of 
     Presidential Determination 95-38 regarding the eligibility 
     for Mongolia to be furnished defense articles and services 
     under the Foreign Assistance Act and the Arms Export Control 
     Act, pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 2311; to the Committee on 
     International Relations.
```
§ 39.63 What modifications and auxiliary aids and services are required at terminals and other landside facilities for individuals with hearing or vision impairments? ( a ) As a PVO, you must ensure that the information you provide to the general public at terminals and other landside facilities is effectively communicated to individuals who are blind or who have impaired vision and deaf or hard-of-hearing individuals, through the use of auxiliary aids and services. To the extent that this information is not available to these individuals through accessible signage and/or verbal public address announcements or other means, your personnel must promptly provide the information to such individuals on their request, in languages (*e.g.,* English, Norwegian, Japanese) in which the information is provided to the general public.
( b ) The types of information you must make available include, but are not limited to, information concerning ticketing, fares, schedules and delays, and the checking and claiming of luggage.
§ 29.1 What is the purpose and authority for this part? ( a ) The regulations in this part implement the Tribal Transportation Self Governance Program established in 23 U.S.C. 207 and set forth rules for compacts and funding agreements negotiated between the Department and Tribes eligible under the Program.
( b ) The Department prepared and issued these rules pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 207(n) with the active participation and representation of Tribes, Tribal organizations, consortia, and individual Tribal members, consistent with the procedures of the Negotiated Rulemaking Act.
**Exhibit 24.5**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS** that I, **Nelson A. Diaz**do hereby appoint John W.Rowe and William A. Von Hoene, Jr., or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2008 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, tobe filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**Nelson A. Diaz**

**DATE: February 1, 2009**
-----Original Message-----

From: Al Kave [mailto:akave1828@gmail.com] 

Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 5:00 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Dear Sir or Madam

My understanding is that the Department of Labor, EBSA, has proposed rules which would limit my 

ability to trade listed options in my IRA and reduce available resources. It’s a limitation that will 

probably reduce my retirement financial security.

I have reviewed some of the published comments and I suggest that you pay close attention to the 

testimony of Ralph Derbyshire (Fidelity

Investments) and Scott Stolz (Raymond James). [Note that I do not have accounts with either company.] 

These men point out some of the likely unintended consequences of the proposed rule-making. From 

an investor's perspective, your proposed rules could make the already difficult job of investing much 

harder by taking away many of the tools, educational resources, and advice that I currently have.

By trading options in my IRA I've made my retirement more secure. Using options, I can buy stocks at 

lower prices, and I can earn additional returns on existing assets. This year I've used options to earn a 

reasonable return on cash in my account while keeping the flexibility and security of maintaining that 

cash.

Have I made some mistakes? Of course. Have I had overall success using options? Yes. Do I need the 

federal government to limit my flexibility? Absolutely not. Since I am self-directing my investments, 

your new rules are very likely to make things worse for me.

I have traded options in my IRA, just as I have in non-retirement accounts, and I had to qualify for this 

privilege. Education and support from my brokerage firms are available to me 24-7. And I have used 

those resources.

This proposed rule could change all of that by making my brokerage firm a fiduciary for my IRA if it 

provides any research, tools or education that the rule views as “advice.” My account would likely be 

considered an “advised IRA,” and options trading would be prohibited.

In order to trade options in my IRA, my brokerage firm would likely be required to remove most 

research, tools and educational resources so my account would not be considered an “advised IRA.” So 

not only would the proposed rule limit my ability to protect my retirement, it could also limit my 

educational resources.

Since tax revenues may increase if people divert resources from these severely limited IRA accounts, the 

proposed rule could effectively be defeating some of the original reasons for IRAs -- tax efficiency and 

retirement security. For me, you would be changing the rules of IRA usage after I've already committed 

resources to those IRAs.

Please preserve the freedoms I currently enjoy to choose how I invest in my retirement accounts and 

plan for a better financial tomorrow.
Albert Kave

Greensburg, PA 15601