alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC LAW 112–281—JAN. 14, 2013 126 STAT. 2485 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3677: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 158 (2012): Dec. 12, considered and passed Senate. 

Vol. 158 (2013): Jan. 1, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–281 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To make a technical correction to the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION. 

Section 102(d)(1)(A) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 

1973 (42 U.S.C. 4012a(d)(1)(A)) is amended by inserting ‘‘residential’’ before ‘‘improved real estate’’ each place that term appears. 

Approved January 14, 2013. 

Jan. 14, 2013 

[S. 3677] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 133

Calling for the immediate and unconditional release from prison of certain

Kurdish members of the Parliament of the Republic of Turkey.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 7, 2001

Mr. FILNER (for himself, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. KIRK,

and Mr. BONIOR) submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Calling for the immediate and unconditional release from

prison of certain Kurdish members of the Parliament

of the Republic of Turkey.

Whereas the friendship between the peoples of the United

States and the Republic of Turkey is based on a mutual

respect and a shared commitment to democracy, human

rights, and the rule of law;

Whereas Turkey is now a candidate for membership in the

European Union, a community of nations likewise based

on shared values of democracy and human rights;

Whereas four former parliamentarians from the now banned

Kurdish-based Democracy Party (DEP), Leyla Zana,

Hatip Dicle, Orhan Dogan, and Selim Sadak, remain imprisoned at Ankara’s Ulucanlar Prison; and
2

•HRES 133 IH

Whereas 153 Members of the United States Congress in

1997 signed a letter to President Clinton calling for

Leyla Zana’s immediate and unconditional release ‘‘so

that we may again welcome her to our shores’’: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives declares

2 that the immediate and unconditional release from prison

3 in the Republic of Turkey of the parliamentarians Leyla

4 Zana, Hatip Dicle, Orhan Dogan, and Selim Sadak is a

5 vital step in upholding due process in Turkey and facili6 tating Turkey’s integration into the European Union.

Æ
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsUnified aeroacoustics analysis for high speed turboprop aerodynamics and noise. Volume 2: Development of theory for wing shieldingA unified theory for aerodynamics and noise of advanced turboprops is presented. The theory and a computer code developed for evaluation at the shielding benefits that might be expected by an aircraft wing in a wing-mounted propeller installation are presented. Several computed directivity patterns are presented to demonstrate the theory. Recently with the advent of the concept of using the wing of an aircraft for noise shielding, the case of diffraction by a surface in a flow has been given attention. The present analysis is based on the case of diffraction of no flow. By combining a Galilean and a Lorentz transform, the wave equation with a mean flow can be reduced to the ordinary equation. Allowance is also made in the analysis for the case of a swept wing. The same combination of Galilean and Lorentz transforms lead to a problem with no flow but a different sweep. The solution procedures for the cases of leading and trailing edges are basically the same. Two normalizations of the solution are given by the computer program. FORTRAN computer programs are presented with detailed documentation. The output from these programs compares favorably with the results of other investigators.Document ID19910014536Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsAmiet, R. K.*(United Technologies Research Center East Hartford, CT, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1991Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-185192NAS 1.26:185192Accession Number91N23849Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 535-03-01CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-23720Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910014536.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.349 What records may a service agent receive and maintain? ( a ) Except where otherwise specified in this part, as a service agent you may receive and maintain all records concerning DOT drug and alcohol testing programs, including positive, negative, and refusal to test individual test results. You do not need the employee's consent to receive and maintain these records.
( b ) You may maintain all information needed for operating a drug/alcohol program (*e.g.,* CCFs, ATFs, names of employees in random pools, random selection lists, copies of notices to employers of selected employees) on behalf of an employer.
( c ) If a service agent originating drug or alcohol testing information, such as an MRO or BAT, sends the information directly to the DER, he or she may also provide the information simultaneously to you, as a C/TPA or other service agent who maintains this information for the employer.
( d ) If you are serving as an intermediary in transmitting information that is required to be provided to the employer, you must ensure that it reaches the employer in the same time periods required elsewhere in this part.
( e ) You must ensure that you can make available to the employer within two business days any information the employer is asked to produce by a DOT agency representative.
( f ) On request of an employer, you must, at any time on the request of an employer, transfer immediately all records pertaining to the employer and its employees to the employer or to any other service agent the employer designates. You must carry out this transfer as soon as the employer requests it. You are not required to obtain employee consent for this transfer. You must not charge more than your reasonable administrative costs for conducting this transfer. You may not charge a fee for the release of these records.
( g ) If you are planning to go out of business or your organization will be bought by or merged with another organization, you must immediately notify all employers and offer to transfer all records pertaining to the employer and its employees to the employer or to any other service agent the employer designates. You must carry out this transfer as soon as the employer requests it. You are not required to obtain employee consent for this transfer. You must not charge more than your reasonable administrative costs for conducting this transfer. You may not charge a fee for the release of these records.
[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 41955, Aug. 9, 2001]
#### § 366.1T Applicability.

These rules, relating to the filing of designations of persons upon whom court process may be served, govern motor carriers and brokers and, as of the moment of succession, their fiduciaries (as defined at 49 CFR 387.319(a)).

[82 FR 5303, Jan. 17, 2017]
1210-AB32-2-1119.html[7/24/2015 6:05:54 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-5crt

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1613

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: humphrey cox m

General Comment

Leave my retirement alone I can take care of myself no nanny state people need to be self relient we need to do

 away with 90%. Of the federal government we are 50 little sovereign nations leave us alone
EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




To the Board of Directors
of The CIT Group Holdings, Inc.:

     We consent to  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements No.
33-58107, No. 33-58418, No. 33-85224, No. 33-64309 and No. 333-07249 on Form S-3
of The CIT Group Holdings,  Inc. of our report dated January 17, 1997, except as
to Note 21  which is as of  February  21,  1997,  relating  to the  consolidated
balance sheets of The CIT Group Holdings,  Inc. and  subsidiaries as of December
31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders'  equity,  and cash  flows for each of the years in the  three-year
period ended  December 31, 1996,  which report  appears in the December 31, 1996
Annual Report on Form 10-K of The CIT Group Holdings, Inc.


                                                   KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



Short Hills, New Jersey
March 4, 1997
#### Jewell M. Burgdorf, *Respondent, v.*Benjamin E. O’Dell, *Appel*lant.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered in Ontario County Court, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
From: Don Sperlin [mailto:dons98043@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 2:42 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Put it on record that i am desiring FIDUCIARY advice when 

deciding what to do with savings as my wife and i both become 

retired soon!!! Just like what David Certner said, we will be 

making significant, one time decisions that will effect our 

lives throughout retirement and the government can help by 

giving us some protections. At least we need transparency 

[buyer beware] over "who is the buyer working for"?

We need to know if we are hearing a sales pitch or getting good 

advice!

I expect to pay something for expertise of a working person who 

is assisting me but hidden objectives contrary to my own best 

interests can be quit damaging to my financial health.

Yahoo!! to Thomas Perez who said in an interview: "I was 

concerned if I was going to hurt the people I want to help. And 

the answer is 'Hell no'" This quote made me cheer!!! THANK YOU 

MR PEREZ !!!!!

Thanks also to M. Singletary of Washington Post Writers Group 

for bringing this to my attention!!
1210-AB32-2-1095.html[7/24/2015 5:44:52 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-6lks

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1589

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Wayne Ward

General Comment

I worked and contributed to my retirement account and can handle what I have without the government telling

 me what to do and how to do it. Leave my retirement account alone and let me do what I want and when I want.

 You don't know my life and what I want or need and I can use what I have to take care of myself without

 government inference.
#### John Kleinhaus and others *v.*Henry Generous.

Motion for leave to file petition in error.

J. *II. Magruder,*for the motion.

*E B. Ladder,*contra.

By the Court.

1. Where the principal debtor has amply-indemnified the surety by mortgage, an agreement by the-creditor with the principal debtor to extend the time of credit does not discharge the surety.

2. Partners in mercantile business have power to bind the-firm by borrowing money for its use, and when money is*bona fide*so loaned for its use, a subsequent misapplication of the money to the individual use of the partner will not deprive the lender of his remedy against the other members-of the firm.

*Motion overruled.*
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Nov-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  August-31-1996
<CASH>                        1,692,457
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 167,348
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              000
<PP&E>                        29,791,838
<DEPRECIATION>                11,696,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                20,627,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,044,393
<BONDS>                       000
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    19,583,256
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  20,627,649
<SALES>                       2,726,618
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              2,825,762
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              2,266,043
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               000
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           559,719
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  559,719
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 5.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                 000
        

</TABLE>
§ 553.15 Contents of notices of proposed rulemaking and direct final rules. ( a ) Each notice of proposed rulemaking, and each direct final rule, is published in the Federal Register, unless all persons subject to it are named and are personally served with a copy of it.
( b ) Each notice, whether published in the Federal Register or personally served, includes ( 1 ) A statement of the time, place, and nature of the rulemaking proceeding;
( 2 ) A reference to the authority under which it is issued;
( 3 ) A description of the subjects and issues involved or the substance and terms of the rule.
( 4 ) A statement of the time within which written comments must be submitted; and
( 5 ) A statement of how and to what extent interested persons may participate in the proceedings.
[60 FR 62222, Dec. 5, 1995, as amended at 80 FR 36492, June 25, 2015]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsError modeling for differential GPSDifferential Global Positioning System (DGPS) positioning is used to accurately locate a GPS receiver based upon the well-known position of a reference site. In utilizing this technique, several error sources contribute to position inaccuracy. This thesis investigates the error in DGPS operation and attempts to develop a statistical model for the behavior of this error. The model for DGPS error is developed using GPS data collected by Draper Laboratory. The Marquardt method for nonlinear curve-fitting is used to find the parameters of a first order Markov process that models the average errors from the collected data. The results show that a first order Markov process can be used to model the DGPS error as a function of baseline distance and time delay. The model's time correlation constant is 3847.1 seconds (1.07 hours) for the mean square error. The distance correlation constant is 122.8 kilometers. The total process variance for the DGPS model is 3.73 sq meters.Document ID19950022295Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeThesis/DissertationAuthorsBlerman, Gregory S.*(Draper (Charles Stark) Lab., Inc. Cambridge, MA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 12, 1995Subject CategoryAircraft Communications And NavigationReport/Patent NumberCSDL-T-1241NASA-CR-188367NAS 1.26:288367Accession Number95N28716Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-18426Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19950022295.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.101 What relationship may a laboratory have with an MRO? ( a ) As a laboratory, you may not enter into any relationship with an MRO that creates a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest with the MRO's responsibilities for the employer. You may not derive any financial benefit by having an employer use a specific MRO.
( b ) The following are examples of relationships between laboratories and MROs that the Department regards as creating conflicts of interest, or the appearance of such conflicts. This following list of examples is not intended to be exclusive or exhaustive: ( 1 ) The laboratory employs an MRO who reviews test results produced by the laboratory;
( 2 ) The laboratory has a contract or retainer with the MRO for the review of test results produced by the laboratory;
( 3 ) The laboratory designates which MRO the employer is to use, gives the employer a slate of MROs from which to choose, or recommends certain MROs;
( 4 ) The laboratory gives the employer a discount or other incentive to use a particular MRO;
( 5 ) The laboratory has its place of business co-located with that of an MRO or MRO staff who review test results produced by the laboratory; or
( 6 ) The laboratory permits an MRO, or an MRO's organization, to have a financial interest in the laboratory.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 249

Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 2, 2001

Mr. PORTMAN submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating majority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

2 are hereby, elected to the following standing committee of

3 the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Bryant to rank

5 after Mr. Goodlatte; and Mr. Pence.

Æ
# USCENTCOM commander's holiday message

/ Published Dec. 24, 2014

24 December 2014

Teammates,

The holidays are a wonderful time of year. They provide a well-deserved opportunity to take a bit of a break, spend some time together with loved ones and friends, and, most importantly, reflect on the true meaning of this season of giving.

The past year has been an incredibly busy one for all of us assigned to or associated with U.S. Central Command. Every one of the 20 countries that make up our area of responsibility has demanded our best efforts, and this team has done extraordinary work under some very tough conditions. Although many challenges still exist in parts of the region, I am pleased to report that, overall, conditions are trending positive. This is a direct reflection of your hard work and the work of your teammates. You are making a lasting difference through your individual and collective efforts, and you should feel very proud of this fact.

That said, there is more work to be done! The year ahead promises to be one of transitions and new beginnings, and we must seize on the many opportunities that exist and build upon the progress that we have achieved thus far. In the spirit of the holidays and like past generations, in all that we do we should always strive to achieve our ultimate goal of peace on earth and goodwill towards all mankind.

As you celebrate the holidays, please pass along my sincere thanks and best wishes to your spouses and children and other close family members. We could not do what we do on behalf of our Nation without their love and support. Each of them is a valued member of our CENTCOM team and we are grateful for their service and for their many sacrifices. During this holiday season, please also keep in your thoughts and prayers our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, Coastguardsmen, and Civilians who are far from home and serving their country and their fellow citizens in difficult and dangerous places around the globe. They are the very best in the world and we are incredibly proud of them.

Again, I want to take this opportunity to thank you all for your hard work, your tremendous enthusiasm, and for your incredible commitment to the mission and to our team. Charlene and I wish you and your families a very safe and enjoyable holiday.

I am proud of you! God bless.

AUSTINCOMCENT