alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32-8



Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code



The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Report on Form 10-K of PECO Energy Company for the year ended December 31,
2008, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of PECO Energy Company.



|                       |  |                                                                     
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 6, 2009 |  | /s/    PHILLIP S.
BARNETT                                           
|                       |  | Phillip S. Barnett Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



471
#### Alonzo Greene, Respondent, v. P. W. Hallenbeck and another, Appellants.

Motion for . leave, etc., denied.
1210-AB32-2-1225.html[7/24/2015 8:47:42 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvs-nc9u

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1720

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: David Krapff

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan my own retirement and I do not want the government to regulate and or restrict the use

 of my retirement savings.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 254

Supporting the goals of Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance Day.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 4, 2001

Mr. ARMEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Supporting the goals of Pregnancy and Infant Loss

Remembrance Day.

Whereas each year, approximately 1,000,000 pregnancies in

the United States end in miscarriage, stillbirth, or the

death of a newborn baby;

Whereas it is a great tragedy to lose the life of a child;

Whereas babies sometimes live within or outside their mothers’ wombs for only a short period of time;

Whereas even the shortest lives are still valuable, and the

grief of those who mourn the loss of these lives should

not be trivialized;

Whereas more than 35 States have designated October 15,

2001, as Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance Day;
2

•HRES 254 IH

Whereas the observance of Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance Day can give validation to those who have

lost a baby through miscarriage, stillbirth, or other complications;

Whereas Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance Day will

provide the people of the United States with an opportunity to increase their understanding of the great tragedy involved in the deaths of unborn and newborn babies;

and

Whereas Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance Day will

enable the people of the United States to consider how,

as individuals and communities, they can meet the needs

of bereaved mothers, fathers, and family members and

work to prevent the causes of these deaths: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports

2 the goals of Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance

3 Day.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statement of income and consolidated balance sheet and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000021212
<NAME> COACHMEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                      <C>               <C>              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            YEAR              YEAR             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        DEC-31-1997       DEC-31-1996<F1>  DEC-31-1995<F1>
<PERIOD-END>             DEC-31-1997       DEC-31-1996      DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                        71,428            66,449           17,021
<SECURITIES>                  15,853               500              500
<RECEIVABLES>                 31,308            25,462           25,395
<ALLOWANCES>                   1,354               919              863
<INVENTORY>                   68,416            68,311           55,434
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             189,938           163,913          101,722
<PP&E>                        81,739            69,172           59,045
<DEPRECIATION>                35,137            29,314           27,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               259,062           227,448          150,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         49,676            38,522           41,135
<BONDS>                       12,591            14,841           12,118
<COMMON>                      71,139            70,672           21,548
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0                 0                0
<PREFERRED>                        0                 0                0
<OTHER-SE>                   118,997            96,984           69,490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 259,062           227,448          150,249
<SALES>                      661,591           606,474          515,862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             661,591           606,474          515,862
<CGS>                        568,836           517,966          444,627
<TOTAL-COSTS>                626,331           566,802          489,203
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               3,565             1,811            1,298
<LOSS-PROVISION>               1,617               158              292
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             2,544             1,572            3,142
<INCOME-PRETAX>               38,826            41,483           27,957
<INCOME-TAX>                  14,063            14,146           10,408
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           24,763            27,337           17,549
<DISCONTINUED>                     0                 0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0                 0                0
<CHANGES>                          0             2,294                0
<NET-INCOME>                  24,763            29,631           17,549
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   1.44              1.94             1.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                   1.42              1.91             1.17
<FN>
<F1>RESTATED.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 

Received: July 21, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k3x-egyr

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2637

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Heather Bryant

General Comment

Please keep the government from my retirement. We the people can take care of it on our own. 

The government has eroded enough of our freedoms. Don't let them take anymore!
EXHIBIT 23.4





                          PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS






We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements  on Form S-3  (Nos.  333-62295,  333-62295-01  and  333-62295-02)  of
Pennsylvania  Electric Company of our report dated February 28, 2003 relating to
the  consolidated  financial  statements,  which appears in the Annual Report to
Stockholders,  which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also
consent to the  incorporation by reference of our report dated February 28, 2003
relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 24, 2003
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.203 What are the requirements to obtain and maintain certification to perform a safety audit or investigation, including review? ( a ) On and after August 27, 2021, an individual who is not qualified under § 385.201(a) may not perform a safety audit or investigation, including review, unless the individual has been certified by FMCSA or a State or local agency applying the FMCSA standards after successfully completing classroom training and examinations on the FMCSRs and HMRs as described in detail on the FMCSA website (*www.fmcsa.dot.gov/certification*). These individuals must also comply with the maintenance of certification/qualification requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) An individual may not perform a safety audit or investigation, including review, unless the individual meets the quality-control and periodic re-training requirements adopted by FMCSA to ensure the maintenance of high standards and familiarity with amendments to the FMCSRs and HMRs. These maintenance of certification/qualification requirements are described in detail on the FMCSA website (*www.fmcsa.dot.gov/certification*).
( c ) The requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section for training, performance, and maintenance of certification/qualification, which are described on the FMCSA website (*www.fmcsa.dot.gov/certification*), are also available in hard copy from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Office of Enforcement and Compliance, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590; Attention: Chief, Compliance Division at (202) 366-1812.
[86 FR 48044, Aug. 27, 2021]
§ 372.233 Chicago, IL. The zone adjacent to, and commercially a part of Chicago, IL, within which transportation by motor vehicle, in interstate or foreign commerce, not under common control, management, or arrangement for a shipment to or from such zone, is partially exempt from regulation under 49 U.S.C. 13506(b)(1), includes and is comprised of all points as follows: ( a ) The municipality of Chicago, IL, itself;
( b ) All points within a line drawn 20 miles beyond the municipal limits of Chicago;
( c ) All points in Lake County, IL.
( d ) All of any municipality any part of which is within the limits of the combined area defined in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, and
( e ) All of any municipality wholly surrounded, or so surrounded except for a water boundary, by the municipality of Chicago or any other municipality included under the terms of paragraph (d) of this section.
[46 FR 11286, Feb. 6, 1981. Redesignated at 55 FR 42198, Oct. 18, 1990, as amended at 62 FR 15422, Apr. 1, 1997; 78 FR 58479, Sept. 24, 2013]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0612

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JONAH MICAH WARR,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 5, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 27 2023

03/27/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0612
1210-AB32-2-1567.html[7/26/2015 7:41:13 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 11, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxd-96jd

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2064

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: James Griffith

General Comment

I'm smart enough to plan my own retirement. I don't need the government overstepping their authority once

 again. Hands-off!
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1250.html[7/22/2015 9:14:23 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-f3io

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1250

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I'm smart enough to prepare and handle my own retirement.
1210-AB32-2-1270.html[7/24/2015 9:58:07 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvu-llva

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1765

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Ronald Poff

Address:

22101 Cosala

Mission Viejo, CA, 92691

Email: rpoff9@gmail.com

General Comment

I strongly oppose any DOL regulations which impose restrictions on how I may handle my IRA or 401k

 retirement savings. I worked hard for my nestegg and no one including government has any right to restrict my

 freedom to plan and use it as I see fit. It's much more important to me and my family than to anyone in

 Washington. Don't even think about it.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, November 7, 1995 (141), Para 141.17 Colorado Land Exchange]
[Page 1876]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.141.17  colorado land exchange

  Mr. COOLEY moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 2437) to 
provide for the exchange of certain lands in Gilpin County, Colorado; as 
amended.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, recognized Mr. COOLEY and Mr. 
RICHARDSON, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill, as amended?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said bill, as amended, was passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and 
said bill, as amended, was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the 
table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.
```
*Merrimack,*

June, 1894.

#### Jones *& a. v.*Sanborn.

Assumpsit, for the sale of liquor in 1887-88, delivered in Boston, Mass., and transported into this state in the unbroken packages in which it left Boston, the plaintiff knowing that the defendant bought the liquor in Boston for the purpose of selling it in this state in violation of the statute. Verdict for the plaintiffs. Defendant excepted.

*Albín*cf *Martin,*for the plaintiffs.

*James*2?. *Barnard*and *Fabius F. Elder,*for the defendant.

Wallace, J.

The decision in *Durkee*v. *Moses,*67 N. H. 115, controls this case.

*Exception overruled.*

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 11.1

<TABLE>
                                      COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<CAPTION>
                                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                                                 March 31,
                                                                      -----------------------------
                                                                         2002               2001
                                                                      ----------          ---------
                                                             (In thousands, except share and per share data)

<S>                                                                   <C>                <C>
Average common shares outstanding.............................        15,380,960          8,824,643

Average common stock equivalents of
  options outstanding - based on the treasury stock method
  using market price..........................................           294,469             62,407
                                                                      ----------          ---------

Average diluted common shares outstanding.....................        15,675,429          8,887,050
                                                                      ==========          =========

Net income....................................................            $4,631             $2,561

Basic earnings per common share...............................              0.30               0.29

Diluted earnings per common share.............................              0.30               0.29

</TABLE>
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Annual

2011 817

Employed full time (persons who usually work 

Number in thousands

16 to 19 years

2011 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU02500012Q

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Employed, Usually Work Full Time, 16-

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:07:12 PM)
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A0 92 2

. TERRY ANTHONY SARGENT v

. OCTAVI A M. J OHNSONSARGENT

Terry An t h o n y Sarg en t (“ Terry ”) ap p eal s fro m t h e F u l t on Co u n t y Su p eri o r

Co u rt ’ s fi n al ju d g m en t an d d ecree o f d iv o rce. He arg u es t h at t h e t ri al co u rt erred by

p rem at u rel y en t eri n g s u ch ju dg m en t b ecau s e h i s wi fe, O ct av i a M arq ui t t a J o h n s o n

Sarg en t (“ Oct av i a”), d id no t s erv e hi m wi t h t h e co m p l ai n t un t il aft er fi n al ju d g m en t

was en t ered

. Th e reco rd s h o ws t h at a cert i fi cat e o f s erv i ce o f t h e co m p l ai n t was fi l ed

b y Oct av i a’ s co u n s el

, al o n g wi t h a b l an k s u m m o n s is s ued b y t h e cl erk ’ s o ffi ce. No

ret u rn o f t h e s u m

m o ns was fi l ed

.

“ Th e s u ffi ci en cy of s erv i ce i s a q ues t i o n o f fact fo r t h e tri al co u rt [.] ” Exu m v.

Mel to n , 2 4 4 Ga. A p p

. 7 7 5

, 77 8 (2 ) (b ) (5 3 6 SE2 d 7 8 6 ) (2 00 0 ). Here, t h e d i v o rce

d ecree was al read y en t ered b y t h e t i m e t h at Terry cl ai m s h e was s erv ed wi t h t h e

co m p l ai n t an d s u m

m o n s

. Acco rd i n gl y , th e t ri al co u rt was n o t affo rd ed an o p p o rt u n i t y

t o ru l e o n t h i s is s u e. W e th erefo re rem an d fo r t h e t ri al co u rt to m ak e a d et erm i n at i o n

reg ard i n g t h e su ffi ci en cy o f s erv i ce o f t h e co m p l ai n t

. Co m

p are El mo r e v. El mo r e , 1 7 7 Ga. Ap p . 6 8 2 , 6 8 2 (2 ) (3 40 SE2 d 6 5 1 ) (1 9 8 6) (wh ere no s u m m o n s was i s s u ed

,

“ d efen d an t ’ s i n s u ffi ci en cy of s erv i ce o f p ro ces s d efen s e [rai s ed b el ow] s h o u l d h av e October 29, 2019b een su s t ai n ed

. ”).

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 10/29/2019
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1032.html[7/22/2015 6:47:13 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-zvy8

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1032

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: James Hart

General Comment

I know how to use my own money. Leave it alone.
Exhibit
      99.1





Notice
      of
      Incomplete Filing





This
      10-QSB filing is incomplete because the required SAS 100 review has not been
      completed.





The
      SAS
      100 has not been completed because of a fee dispute with the Company’s
      independent registered public accounting firm.





The
      Company has also requested a waiver of certain financial covenants from two
      lenders.





The
      amended 10-QSB will be filed as soon as the lending institution has reviewed
      the
      Company’s financial statements, the fee dispute with the accounting firm is
      resolved, and the accounting firm completes the required SAS 100
      review.
§ 350.301 What is the purpose of this subpart? The purpose of this subpart is to assist States receiving MCSAP funds to address compatibility (as defined in § 350.105), including the availability of variances or exemptions allowed under § 350.305 or § 350.307, to: ( a ) Promote adoption and enforcement of compatible laws, regulations, standards, and orders on CMV safety;
( b ) Provide for a continuous review of laws, regulations, standards, and orders on CMV safety;
( c ) Establish deadlines for States to achieve compatibility; and
( d ) Provide States with a process for requesting variances and exemptions for intrastate commerce.