alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0504.html[7/20/2015 7:48:23 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-13ug

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0504

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I'm working hard for my retirement, am capable of planning it and definitely don't need the Government to do it

 for me. I'm more than capable of planning my own retirement!!!!
#### § 510.11 Fees.

Any person compelled to appear in person in response to a subpoena issued under this part at an information gathering hearing or an administrative deposition is paid the same attendance and mileage fees as are paid witnesses in the courts of the United States, in accordance with title 28, U.S.C., section 1821.
TSCA-HQ-2004-0016, et. al. Second Quarter 2007Progress ReportAttachment AJuly 16, 2007SEP Biodegradation: Synthesis Account - VZ78101073 (DuPont Funded)January February March1Q 2007SumApril May June2Q 2007SumCosts as ofDec 31,2006TotalCosts ofProgramas of June30, 2007SalariesChambers Works 1,507 1,507 0 71,94973,456Barley Mill 0 0 2,0292,029Travel 0 0 00Operating Supplies 0 0 6,9786,978RAS Analytical0 0 25,91425,914Overheads 0 0 00Chambers Works 485 485 0 15,70616,191Barley Mill0 0 235235TOTAL 1,992 0 01,992 0 122,812124,803SEP Biodegradation: Main Account - VZ78911724 (SEP Eligible)January February March1Q 2007SumApril May June2Q 2007SumCosts as ofDec 31,2006TotalCosts ofProgramas of June30, 2007SalariesChambers Works 5,796 6,976 7,038 19,810 6,940 7,164 7,285 21,389 122,252163,451Barley Mill 1,139 151 137 1,427 151 144 149 444 10,48212,353Travel 0 0 886886Operating Supplies 32 32 0 2,5122,544Exygen0 0 124,250124,250ILSI ResearchFoundation 0 28,735 28,73528,735Overheads 0 0 00Chambers Works 1,455 1,815 1,797 5,067 1,725 1,725 1,725 5,175 17,38127,623Barley Mill 144 9 816119 17 1753 1,2441,458TOTAL 8,566 8,951 8,98026,4978,835 9,050 37,91155,796 279,007417,096Cost Summary for SEP Program January 1, 2007 to June 30, 2007Page 1 of 1
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1263.html[7/22/2015 9:32:56 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-yxco

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1263

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Please don't tell us how we can and cannot use our own money to plan our retirement. Stay out of our personal

 lives please!
NUMBER 13-15-00030-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

SELVINO PADILLA JR. 

AND JEFFREY M. STERN, Appellants,

v.

ALEX AZOCA, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 430th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justice Rodriguez and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Selvino Padilla Jr. and Jeffrey M. Stern, perfected an appeal from a 

judgment entered by the 430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number 

C-2332-13-J. Appellants have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that 

appellants no longer wish to pursue this appeal. Appellants request that this Court 
2

dismiss the appeal. The certificate of conference reflects that appellants have been 

unsuccessful in attempts to contact appellee. 

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ motion to 

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby 

DISMISSED. There being no agreement in the motion regarding costs, pursuant to Rule 

42.1(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all costs are taxed against appellants. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs 

against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion 

for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

30th day of April, 2015.
###### Editorial Note on Part 381

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 381 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 381.110 What definitions are applicable to this part?

*Commercial motor vehicle* means any motor vehicle that meets the definition of “commercial motor vehicle” found at 49 CFR 382.107 concerning controlled substances and alcohol use and testing, 49 CFR 383.5 concerning commercial driver's license standards, or 49 CFR 390.5 concerning parts 390 through 399 of the FMCSRs.

*Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administrator (the Administrator)* means the chief executive of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, an agency within the Department of Transportation.

*FMCSRs* means Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (49 CFR parts 380, 382, 383, and 384; 49 CFR 390.19 and 390.21; and 49 CFR parts 391 through 393, 395, 396, and 399).

*You* means an individual or motor carrier or other entity that is, or will be, responsible for the operation of a CMV(s). The term includes a motor carrier's agents, officers and representatives as well as employees responsible for hiring, supervising, training, assigning, or dispatching of drivers and employees concerned with the installation, inspection, and maintenance of motor vehicle equipment and/or accessories. *You* also includes any interested party who would like to suggest or recommend that the FMCSA initiate a pilot program.

[63 FR 67608, Dec. 8, 1998, as amended at 80 FR 59072, Oct. 1, 2015; 86 FR 35639, July 7, 2021]
NORWEST FINANCIAL, INC.
                                       
              COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                       
                                 Exhibit (12)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                          Nine
                         Months
                         Ended
                      September 30,
                          1998                   Years Ended December 31,

                                                  (Thousands of Dollars)

                                      1997       1996       1995       1994       1993
<S>                     <C>         <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Net earnings            $188,530    $269,450   $276,331   $267,941   $223,340   $203,297

Add:

    Fixed charges:

    Interest including
    amortization of
    debt expense         357,840     401,736    372,859    359,079   259,605     242,440

    One-third of
    rentals*              10,050      12,107     10,748     10,317     9,747      10,146
  
    Total fixed
    Charges              367,890     413,843    383,607    369,396   269,352     252,586

    Provision for
    income taxes          98,671     144,082    148,096    147,873   116,900     104,228

Total net earnings,
  fixed charges and
  income taxes -
  "Earnings"           $655,091     $827,375   $808,034   $785,210  $609,592    $560,111

Ratio of earnings
  to fixed charges         1.78         2.00       2.11       2.13      2.26        2.22


</TABLE>

*One-third of rentals is deemed representative of the interest factor.
[Civ. No. 11687.

First Dist., Div. Two.

July 7, 1941.]

#### DAVID F. SUPPLE, as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. EDGAR F. LUCKENBACH et al., Appellants.

Phillip Barnett and Samuel Vartan for Appellants.

Leo A. Cunningham for Respondent.

STURTEVANT, J.

As written on the cover of the transcript this is an appeal from an “order denying motion to vacate the judgment filed and entered on July 12, 1938.” The transcript purports to set forth: Notice of Motion to Vacate Judgment; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Vacate Judgment; Affidavit in Support of Motion to Vacate Judgment; Affidavit in Opposition to Motion to Vacate Judgment; Notice of Appeal of Edgar F. Luckenbach; Notice to Prepare Record under Code Civ. Proc. sec. 953a; and Clerk’s Certificate to Clerk’s Transcript on Appeal. It does not purport to set forth any order or judgment.  The notice of appeal recites the defendant appeals “from the order heretofore made herein denying said defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment filed and entered on or about July 12, 1938, and each and every part thereof.” As the record does not show that such an order was ever *735made, nor set forth a copy thereof, the transcript is insufficient. (Code Civ. Proc. sec. 951.) The defect in the record has not been called to our attention by the plaintiff by a motion to dismiss. (2 Cal. Jur. 763.) Assuming solely for the purposes of this decision that this court has no power to dismiss of its own motion, we will proceed to examine the record further.

An earlier appeal was taken by defendants and was decided against them. *(Supple*v. *Luckenbach,*12 Cal. (2d) 319 [84 Pac. (2d) 52].) We refer to that case for a statement of the facts therein recited. After the judgment dated July 12,1938, was entered the defendants did not appeal from it. They made a motion under Code Civ. Proc., sec. 473, to set it aside. That motion, we understand from what is said in the briefs, was denied and later the defendants filed a purported appeal therefrom. It is that purported appeal which we understand is before us. However it is patent that the defendants could have appealed from that judgment. That they have not done, but they have attempted to appeal from the order refusing to set aside said judgment. Clearly the order appealed from was not appealable. (2 Cal. Jur. 164-166, “Appeal and Error”, sec. 30; *Lawson*v. *Guild,*215 Cal. 378, 379 [10 Pac. (2d) 459].) As it was not appealable the purported appeal does not confer jurisdiction on this court. It follows that the purported appeal should be dismissed. (2 Cal. Jur. 752.)

The appeal is dismissed.

Nourse, P. J., and Spence, J., concurred
Exhibit 24-8

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN
ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Richard H. Glanton, do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to
sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2002 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.

|                     |  |                                        
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/RICHARD H. GLANTONRichard H. Glanton
|                     |  |                                        
|DATE: March 20, 2003 |  |                                        

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>                 THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                         EXTRACTED FROM THE COASTAL CORPORATION FORM 10-K ANNUAL
                         REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
                         QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                         FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000,000

<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              21
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,571
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        685
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,529
<PP&E>                                          10,661
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,501
<BONDS>                                          3,663
<COMMON>                                            37
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              100
<PREFERRED>                                          3
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,242
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,625
<SALES>                                          9,653
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,755
<CGS>                                            6,787
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,855
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    66
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 307
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    527
<INCOME-TAX>                                       135
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                392
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (91)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       301
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.65


</TABLE>
1210-AB32-2-1093.html[7/24/2015 5:44:51 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-dt35

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1587

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I have been saving for my retirement since I started working. It is totally unfair that someone else wants to

 control how I spend my savings. Government control of my money in the form of Social Security should be the

 red flag warning that government entities are not competent nor capable of making decisions for individuals.

 Please keep your fingers out of my money!
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           2,212
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,731
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     63,099
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,431
<PP&E>                                          45,904
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,192
<BONDS>                                         23,091
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,537
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,038
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,219
<SALES>                                        130,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               130,578
<CGS>                                           91,915
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,835
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,166
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,317
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (8,184)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,501
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,501
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .82
        

</TABLE>
IV

House Calendar No. 84

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 264

[Report No. 107–238]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2975) to combat terrorism,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 12, 2001

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2975) to combat

terrorism, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2975) to

4 combat terrorism, and for other purposes. The bill shall

5 be considered as read for amendment. In lieu of the

6 amendment recommended by the Committee on the Judi7 ciary now printed in the bill, an amendment in the nature
2

HRES 264 RH

1 of a substitute consisting of the text of H.R. 3108 shall

2 be considered as adopted. All points of order against the

3 bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall

4 be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final

5 passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour

6 of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and con7 trolled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

8 the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to

9 recommit with or without instructions.

House Calendar No. 84

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 264

[Report No. 107–238]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2975)

to combat terrorism, and for other purposes.

OCTOBER 12, 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### § 37.95 Ferries and other passenger vessels operated by public entities. [Reserved]
# Presidential Determination on Waiving Prohibition on United States Military Assistance With Respect to Montenegro

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                    Consistent with the authority vested in me by section 2007 of the American Servicemembers' Protection Act of 2002, as amended (the “Act”), title II of Public Law 107-206 (22 U.S.C. 7421*et seq*.), I hereby:                 

- Determine that Montenegro has entered into an agreement with the United States pursuant to Article 98 of the Rome Statute preventing the International Criminal Court from proceeding against U.S. personnel present in such country; and
- Waive the prohibition of section 2007(a) of the Act with respect to this country for as long as such agreement remains in force.

                    You are authorized and directed to report this determination to the Congress and to arrange for its publication in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

[FR Doc. 07-4616

Billing code 4710-10
1210-AB32-2-1308.html[7/26/2015 1:18:12 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvv-tphg

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1803

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I can and will take care of my own retirement! My 401k, and social security has been for by mine own hard work

 for years. I don't believe you or anybody else has rights to my plans. But ME!! Hands off Greedy people.
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0660 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Carol McDaid 

Address: 

101 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC, 20001 

Email: cmcdaid@capitoldecisions.com 

Organization: Parity Implementation Coalition 

General Comment 

Please find attached the Parity Implementation Coalition's comments on the Interim Final Rules 

under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 

2008. 

Attachments 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: May 03, 2010 

Received: April 30, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ae4b27 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0660.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 5/3/2010