alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Campbell v. The Poudre Valley Bank.

New Trial.

When there is no evidence to support the verdict, a new trial should he granted.

*Appeal from the District Court of Larimer County.*

Mr. Geo. B. Campbell, for appellant.

Messrs. Robinson & Loye, for appellee.

Thomson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This controversy concerns the ownership of a claim against the Union Pacific Railway Company. A matter of difference between Frank R. Campbell and the company, growing out of a failure of title to land, was settled and adjusted between-them by the allowance of $1,150 to Campbell. The appellee brought suit against Campbell and others and garnisheed the company. The latter answered, setting forth the settlement with Campbell, and the allowance to him; but averred that a notice had been served upon it of the assignment of the indebtedness by Frank R. Campbell to the appellant, George B. Campbell. Upon petition of the plaintiff (appellee) the appellant was brought into court to disclose his title to the claim. He thereupon filed a paper in the nature of a petition in intervention, alleging the assignment of the claim to him by Frank R. Campbell for a valuable and adequate consideration a considerable time before the garnishment, without knowledge on his part of any indebtedness from Frank R. to the plaintiff. The testimony of the intervenor at the hearing sustained the averments of his petition in every particular. It showed that he made the purchase in good faith and for value; that he knew nothing of the claim of the plaintiff against Frank R., and supposed that the latter was solvent; and that he had notified the Railway *360Company of the assignment before the garnishment process was served. The testimony was not shaken in the least degree, and its contradiction was not even attempted.

The court, instead of directing a verdict for the intervenor, instructed the jury that if they believed the transaction was entered into for the purpose of defrauding the plaintiff, or if there was an arrangement between the interveuor and Frank R. Campbell whereby the latter was to receive back any portion of the money, they should find for the plaintiff. The verdict was in the plaintiff’s favor; and, after a refusal by the court to set it aside, was followed by a corresponding judgment, from which the intervenor has appealed.

No error is assigned upon the instructions. We shall therefore refrain from comment upon them. The verdict and judgment are properly before us, but there is not much to be said about them. The verdict passes our understanding. We cannot find in the record the slightest justification for it. There is an utter want of evidence of any kind from which even a remote inference favorable to it might be drawn. There was a motion to set it aside, which, instead of being denied, should have been promptly sustained.

The judgment will be reversed.

*Reversed.*
**Exhibit 99.2**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to****Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Debbie Walker, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

|   | 1.     |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |
|   | 2.     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|  |   |   |                                                                                                                                            |
|--|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  |   |   | /s/ DEBBIE WALKER   **Debbie Walker, Senior Vice president****(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)**
November 12,2002
19 |
CENTCOM celebrates Ramadan
 By Sgt. Fredrick Coleman , CENTCOM Public Affairs
  U.S. Army Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III, commander, U.S. Central Command, speaks to guests during an Iftar at the Bay Palms Golf Course here July 22. Iftar is the meal that comes after a day of fasting during the month of Ramadan. (USCENTCOM Photo by Sgt. Fredrick J. Coleman, USMC)
 MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. – U.S. Army Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III, commander, U.S. Central Command, and several distinguished visitors came together with Muslims assigned to USCENTCOM and their families for Iftar at the Bay Palms Golf Course here July 22. Iftar is the meal that comes after a day of fasting during the month of Ramadan. “We here at CENTCOM are very fortunate to participate in events like this,” said Austin during his remarks to attendees. “Ramadan is a time when friends and families of all faiths can come together and enjoy one another.” The evening started with an overview of the history and traditions of Ramadan presented by Alanoud Rashid, who is the daughter of Brig. Gen. Fetais Rashid, the Qatari senior national representative to USCENTCOM.  Following her presentation, U.S. Navy Cmdr. Abuhena Saifulislam, USCENTCOM’s Muslim chaplain, gave the Azan, which is the traditional prayer given to signify the start of Iftar. Traditionally, fasting is broken by sharing dates and drinking water at sunset. This is followed by a variety of foods that include lamb, chicken, beef and rice to remedy the hunger caused by fasting from sunrise to sunset. Muslims observe Ramadan during the ninth month of the Islamic lunar calendar. For a 30-day period, Muslims fast from sunrise to sunset demonstrating self-control, purifying the body and soul and focusing on one’s self and their relationship to God, Alanoud explained during her presentation.
§ 392.82 Using a hand-held mobile telephone. ( a ) ( 1 ) No driver shall use a hand-held mobile telephone while driving a CMV.
( 2 ) No motor carrier shall allow or require its drivers to use a hand-held mobile telephone while driving a CMV.
( b ) *Definitions.* For the purpose of this section only, *driving* means operating a commercial motor vehicle on a highway, including while temporarily stationary because of traffic, a traffic control device, or other momentary delays. Driving does not include operating a commercial motor vehicle when the driver has moved the vehicle to the side of, or off, a highway and has halted in a location where the vehicle can safely remain stationary.
( c ) *Emergency exception.* Using a hand-held mobile telephone is permissible by drivers of a CMV when necessary to communicate with law enforcement officials or other emergency services.
[76 FR 75487, Dec. 2, 2011]
1210-AB32-2-1639.html[7/26/2015 9:21:33 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jy0-kx5u

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2136

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Dan Goonis

Address:

43171 Chardonnay

Sterling Hts., MI, 48314

Email: Dan.goonis@gmail.com

General Comment

I have been involved in helping people invest for their future in IRA's for the last 30 years, and have my clients

 today accumulated net worths that they would never have unless we sat with them! The big banks and brokerage

 firms would never have met with these middle class families simply because of the small dollar amounts they

 had to start with. DO NOT exclude middle Americans the opportunity to have professional licensed

 representatives sit and help counsel them by making regulations that would prohibit this from occurring in the

 future. We already have to many people (80%) who need someone to educate and help them. Daniel Goonis

 Registered Securities Representative since 1983
#### Charles S. Hine and another, Appellants, v. Peter Bowe, Respondent.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0786.html[7/21/2015 12:33:39 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-dmah

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0786

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Americans are smart. They want independence. Don't nanny us. Don't manage our retirement. Period.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1548.html[7/23/2015 11:23:58 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-onh8

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1548

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: WENDY WHYKO

Address:

10 SOMERS

OXFORD, CT, 06478

Email: wendy.whyko@ynhh.org

General Comment

EBSA,

I am smart enough and quite capable of taking care of my own finances as well as my retirement accounts. I

 actually find it insulting not only to me, but to the American people that the government feels they have to step

 in and give advice and take over. Unacceptable.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 28, 1995 (88), Para 88.19 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1056]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.88.19  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mrs. MEEK to the 
amendment, as modified, submitted by Mr. GOSS:
  Amendment submitted by Mrs. MEEK:

       In the matter proposed to be inserted by the amendment, 
     strike ``when it is made known'' and all that follows and 
     insert the following: ``except when it is made known to the 
     President that such government is making continued progress 
     in implementing democratic elections.''

  Amendment, as modified, submitted by Mr. GOSS:

       Page 78, after line 6, insert the following new section:

                     limitation on funds for haiti

       Sec. 564. None of the funds appropriated in this Act may be 
     made available to the Government of Haiti when it is made 
     known to the President that such Government is controlled by 
     a regime holding power through means other than the 
     democratic elections scheduled for calendar year 1995 and 
     held pursuant to the requirements of the 1987 Constitution of 
     Haiti.

It was decided in the

Yeas

189

negative

Nays

231
```
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0506.html[7/20/2015 7:48:23 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-4i3r

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0506

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I have been planning for my own retirement for many years. Stay away from my IRA and other investments!! I

 don't want any more government overreach!
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1409.html[7/23/2015 9:32:39 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvn-f5e5

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1409

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I am able to manage my own retirement savings and do not need the government to interfere
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 12, 2016

No. 04-16-00176-CR

Iliana ARCHULETA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR3479A

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Defendant pled nolo contendre to “injury to child-SBI-omission” and was sentenced 

within the terms of a plea bargain. Defendant timely filed a general notice of appeal. The trial 

court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal states this “is a plea-bargain case, and the 

defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record contains a 

written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended 

by the prosecutor and agreed to by defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately 

reflects that defendant’s case is a plea bargain case and defendant does not have a right of appeal. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were 

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court's 

permission to appeal.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record does not contain a written 

motion ruled on before trial nor does it indicate the trial court granted defendant permission to 

appeal. This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the 

right of appeal has not been made a part of the record.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

It is therefore ORDERED this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless an amended trial court certification that shows defendant has 

the right of appeal has been made part of the appellate record by May 13, 2016. See Daniels v. 

State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1. 
All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification 

issue.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of April, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Helen A. Weaver, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant. Lorenzo J. Van Alstine, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Bockes, J.
§ 234.1 Scope. ( a ) This part prescribes minimum— ( 1 ) Maintenance, inspection, and testing standards for highway-rail grade crossing warning systems;
( 2 ) Standards for the reporting of failures of highway-rail grade crossing warning systems and for the actions that railroads must take when such systems malfunction;
( 3 ) Requirements for certain identified States to update their existing State highway-rail grade crossing action plans and submit reports about the implementation of their existing plans and for the remaining States and the District of Columbia to develop State highway-rail grade crossing action plans;
( 4 ) Requirements that certain railroads establish systems for receiving toll-free telephone calls reporting various unsafe conditions at highway-rail grade crossings and pathway grade crossings, and for taking certain actions in response to those calls; and
( 5 ) Requirements for reporting to, and periodically updating information contained in, the U.S. DOT National Highway-Rail Crossing Inventory for highway-rail and pathway crossings.
( b ) This part does not restrict a railroad from adopting and enforcing additional or more stringent requirements not inconsistent with this part.
[77 FR 35190, June 12, 2012, as amended at 80 FR 786, Jan. 6, 2015; 85 FR 80659, Dec. 14, 2020]
**Exhibit32**

** **

CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF PALMETTOBANCSHARES, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

 

Theundersigned, as the chief executive officer and principal financial officer ofPalmetto Bancshares, Inc., certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ended June 30, 2008, which accompanies this certification, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in theperiodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. at the datesand for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and no purchaser orseller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon theforegoing certification for any purpose.  The undersigned expressly disclaimsany obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

 

 

 

/s/      L. Leon Patterson                           

L. Leon Patterson

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

/s/      Paul W. Stringer                                              

Paul W. Stringer

President and Chief Operating Officer,

Chief Accounting Officer 

 

 

Dated:August 11, 2008
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 228

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the 55th

anniversary of the Lynwood Chamber of Commerce, California, and its

outstanding leadership for Lynwood business owners.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 2001

Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the 55th anniversary of the Lynwood Chamber of

Commerce, California, and its outstanding leadership for

Lynwood business owners.

Whereas the Lynwood Chamber of Commerce, California, was

founded in 1946, and W.W. Jones, principal of the high

school, was elected the first president of the chamber,

and Jack Weaver was elected the first secretary;

Whereas 2001 marks the 55th anniversary of the Lynwood

Chamber of Commerce, California, an organization that

has provided outstanding assistance to its members, helping their businesses flourish;
2

•HRES 228 IH

Whereas the Lynwood Chamber of Commerce, California represents over 1,500 home-based, commercial, industrial,

and manufacturing businesses in Lynwood;

Whereas the Lynwood Chamber of Commerce, California continues to promote area businesses through functions such

as the Annual Business and Economic Development

Expo;

Whereas the Lynwood Chamber of Commerce, California

hosts important events for business owners, including forums for minority and women business owners and the

Annual Legislative Conference, which allows businesses

to meet with their elected officials from the local to Federal level; and

Whereas the Lynwood Chamber of Commerce, California provides youth scholarships, including the Mr. and Miss

Lynwood Scholarship Competition and the Annual Educational Golf Classic, which have generated over

$150,000 in the past 10 years: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) the Lynwood Chamber of Commerce, Cali4 fornia serves the businesses of Lynwood with distinc5 tion; and

6 (2) the Lynwood Chamber of Commerce, Cali7 fornia provides important scholarships for children

8 and assists business owners, including minorities

9 and women, to promote their businesses.

Æ
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 168

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Nation’s

schools should honor Native Americans for their contributions to American history, culture, and education.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 18, 2001

Mr. BACA (for himself, Mr. PALLONE, Ms. MCKINNEY, Mr. LANGEVIN, Ms.

MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. CARSON of Oklahoma, Mr.

HALL of Ohio, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. REYES, Mr. TOWNS, Mr.

HONDA, Mr. FILNER, Mrs. CAPPS, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BLUMENAUER,

Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. ENGLISH, Mrs. MINK

of Hawaii, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. KIND, Mr. FROST, Mr. STUPAK,

Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Mr. BONIOR, Mr. FARR of California, and

Mr. MCDERMOTT) submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the Nation’s schools should honor Native Americans for

their contributions to American history, culture, and education.

Whereas Native Americans have given much to this country;

Whereas an emphasis on freedom, justice, patriotism, and

representative government have always been elements of

Native American culture;
2

•HRES 168 IH

Whereas Native Americans have shown their willingness to

fight and die for this Nation in foreign lands;

Whereas Native Americans honor the American flag at every

powwow and at many gatherings and remember all veterans through song, music, and dance;

Whereas Native Americans honor, through song, the men and

women of this country who have fought for freedom;

Whereas Native Americans love the land that has nurtured

their parents, grandparents, and unnamed elders since

the beginning of their recorded history; and

Whereas Native Americans honor the Earth that has brought

life to the people since time immemorial: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the Nation’s schools should honor Native

3 Americans for their contributions to American history,

4 culture, and education.

Æ