UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
      ACT OF 1934

                For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005


[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT


             For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-11935


                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX
        (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                              94-2887133
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the small business issuer was required to file such reports) and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ___


                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                                 March 31, 2005

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



Assets
<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $ 535
   Receivables and deposits                                                     352
   Restricted escrows                                                           844
   Other assets                                                               1,275
   Assets held for sale (Note A)                                              3,337
   Investment properties:
      Land                                                    $ 8,774
      Buildings and related personal property                  73,999
                                                               82,773
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (50,074)       32,699
                                                                           $ 39,042
Liabilities and Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 253
   Tenant security deposits payable                                             229
   Accrued property taxes                                                       414
   Other liabilities                                                            470
   Due to affiliates (Note B)                                                   950
   Mortgage notes payable                                                    40,454
   Liabilities related to assets held for sale (Note A)                       4,920
Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
   General partner                                            $(10,021)
   Limited partners (89,292 units issued and
      outstanding)                                              1,373        (8,648)
                                                                           $ 39,042

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


<PAGE>





                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                               March 31,
                                                        2005               2004
                                                                        (Restated)
Revenues:
<S>                                                    <C>               <C>
  Rental income                                        $ 2,624           $ 2,476
  Other income                                             311               355
   Casualty gain (Note C)                                   16                --
      Total revenues                                     2,951             2,831

Expenses:
  Operating                                              1,403             1,216
  General and administrative                               113               109
  Depreciation                                             739               721
  Interest                                                 683               676
  Property tax                                             243               248
      Total expenses                                     3,181             2,970

Loss from continuing operations                           (230)             (139)
Income (loss) from discontinued
    operations (Note A)                                     35               (57)

Net loss                                               $ (195)            $ (196)

Net loss allocated to general partner                   $ (24)            $ (24)
Net loss allocated to limited partners                    (171)             (172)

                                                       $ (195)            $ (196)
Per limited partnership unit:
  Loss from continuing operations                      $ (2.27)          $ (1.38)
  Income (loss) from discontinued operations              0.35             (0.55)

Net loss per limited partnership unit                  $ (1.92)          $ (1.93)

Distributions per limited partnership unit              $ --              $ 5.92

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>



                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

           CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' (DEFICIENCY) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                     Limited
                                    Partnership    General      Limited
                                       Units       Partner      Partners       Total

<S>                                    <C>           <C>        <C>           <C>
Original capital contributions         89,292        $ --       $89,292       $89,292

Partners' (deficiency) capital
   at December 31, 2004               89,292       $ (9,997)    $ 1,544       $(8,453)

Net loss for the three months
   ended March 31, 2005                   --            (24)       (171)         (195)

Partners' (deficiency) capital
   at March 31, 2005                  89,292       $(10,021)    $ 1,373       $(8,648)

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>



                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                       March 31,
                                                                    2005     2004
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                              <C>         <C>
  Net loss                                                       $ (195)     $ (196)
  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided
   by operating activities:
      Depreciation                                                  739          810
      Amortization of loan costs                                     27           22
      Casualty gain                                                 (16)          --
      Bad debt expense                                               75          183
      Change in accounts:
       Receivables and deposits                                     (45)        (238)
       Other assets                                                (118)        (223)
       Accounts payable                                              45           74
       Tenant security deposits payable                               3          (13)
       Accrued property taxes                                       160          274
       Other liabilities                                            (68)           2
       Due to affiliates                                            (42)          15
       Due to former affiliate                                       --         (376)
         Net cash provided by operating activities                  565          334

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (404)        (217)
  Net insurance proceeds received                                    23           --
  Net withdrawals from (deposits to) restricted escrows              16          (17)
         Net cash used in investing activities                     (365)        (234)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage notes payable                               (319)        (288)
  Advances from affiliates                                          130           --
  Distributions to partners                                          --         (600)
         Net cash used in financing activities                     (189)        (888)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                 11         (788)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                    524        1,250
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                       $ 535        $ 462

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                         $ 754        $ 756

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash information:
  Fixed assets in accounts payable                                $ 40        $ 60

At December 31,  2004,  accounts  payable  included  approximately  $110,000 for
property   improvements  and  replacements,   which  are  included  in  property
improvements and replacements for the three months ended March 31, 2005.


         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>



<PAGE>




                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The  accompanying   unaudited   consolidated  financial  statements  of  Century
Properties Fund XIX (the  "Partnership" or  "Registrant")  have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial statements. The general partner of the Partnership is Fox Partners II,
a California  general  partnership.  The general partners of Fox Partners II are
Fox Capital Management Corporation ("FCMC" or the "Managing General Partner"), a
California  corporation,  Fox Realty  Investors  ("FRI"),  a California  general
partnership, and Fox Partners 83, a California general partnership. The Managing
General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment  Investment and Management  Company
("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. In the opinion of the
Managing  General  Partner,  all  adjustments  (consisting  of normal  recurring
accruals)  considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.
Operating  results  for the three  month  period  ended  March 31,  2005 are not
necessarily  indicative  of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year
ending  December 31, 2005. For further  information,  refer to the  consolidated
financial  statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144,
the  consolidated  statement of operations  for the three months ended March 31,
2004 has been restated to reflect the  operations  of Misty Woods  Apartments as
income (loss) from discontinued  operations due to the intention of the Managing
General Partner to sell the property within one year.  Included in income (loss)
from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004,
is approximately  $335,000 and $314,000,  respectively,  of revenue generated by
the property.  The assets and liabilities of Misty Woods Apartments are shown as
held for sale on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

Certain  2004  balances  have  been   reclassified  to  conform  with  the  2005
presentation.

Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Managing General Partner and
its  affiliates  for  the  management  and  administration  of  all  partnership
activities.   The  Partnership   Agreement  provides  for  certain  payments  to
affiliates for services and as  reimbursement  of certain  expenses  incurred by
affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

Affiliates of the Managing General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from all
of  the  Partnership's   properties  as  compensation  for  providing   property
management  services.  The  Partnership  paid to such  affiliates  approximately
$163,000  and  $158,000  for the three  months  ended  March 31,  2005 and 2004,
respectively,  which is included in operating  expenses  and income  (loss) from
discontinued operations.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  received   reimbursement  of
accountable  administrative  expenses  amounting  to  approximately  $53,000 and
$45,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively,  which
is included in general and administrative expenses.

Pursuant  to  the  Partnership  Agreement,  for  managing  the  affairs  of  the
Partnership,  the Managing  General Partner is entitled to receive a Partnership
management fee equal to 10% of the  Partnership's  adjusted cash from operations
as  distributed.  During the three months  ended March 31,  2004,  approximately
$60,000  was  paid  to  the  Managing   General   Partner  and  is  included  in
distributions  to the Managing  General  Partner.  No fee was earned  during the
three  months  ended March 31, 2005  because  there were no  distributions  from
operations.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  has  made  available  to the
Partnership  a  credit  line  of  up to  $150,000  per  property  owned  by  the
Partnership.  During the three months ended March 31, 2005,  an affiliate of the
Managing General Partner advanced the Partnership  approximately  $130,000. This
advance was used to pay property  taxes at one of the  Partnership's  properties
and operating expenses at another.  There were no such advances during the three
months ended March 31, 2004. Interest on the credit line is charged at the prime
rate plus 2% or 7.75% at March 31,  2005.  Interest  expense  was  approximately
$16,000 for the three  months  ended  March 31,  2005.  No interest  was charged
during the three months ended March 31, 2004. At March 31, 2005, the Partnership
owed  approximately  $950,000 of principal and interest which is shown as due to
affiliates on the accompanying  consolidated balance sheet.  Subsequent to March
31, 2005, the Managing  General Partner advanced  approximately  $282,000 to the
Partnership to pay operating  expenses at one of the  investment  properties and
for a rate lock fee for the  refinancing  of the  mortgage  encumbering  another
property.

The  Partnership  insures its properties up to certain  limits through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the AIMCO limits through
insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers  unaffiliated  with the
Managing  General  Partner.  During the three months  ended March 31, 2005,  the
Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates  approximately  $128,000 for
hazard insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.
Additional  charges  will be  incurred by the  Partnership  during 2005 as other
insurance policies renew later in the year. The Partnership was charged by AIMCO
and its  affiliates  approximately  $191,000  for  insurance  coverage  and fees
associated with policy claims  administration during the year ended December 31,
2004.

Note C - Casualties

In December 2004, one of the Partnership's  investment properties,  Vinings Peak
Apartments,  incurred  damages as a result of a fire. As a result of the damage,
approximately  $23,000 of fixed assets and approximately  $16,000 of accumulated
depreciation  were written off during the three months ended March 31, 2005. The
property received  approximately  $23,000 in proceeds from the insurance company
to repair the damaged  units and  recognized  a casualty  gain of  approximately
$16,000 as a result of the difference  between the proceeds received and the net
book value of the buildings which were damaged.

In 2004,  Sunrunner  Apartments  experienced  damage from Hurricanes Frances and
Jeanne.  The Partnership  estimates total damage costs from Hurricane  Jeanne of
approximately $131,000, which the Partnership expects to be partially covered by
insurance  proceeds.  The Partnership  does not expect a casualty loss to result
from this event.  During 2004,  the  Partnership  recognized a casualty  loss of
approximately $8,000 related to damages from Hurricane Frances. During the three
months ended March 31, 2005, the  Partnership  revised the estimated  damages to
the  building  and as a  result,  reversed  the  write  off of  net  assets  and
associated  casualty  loss.  The income of  approximately  $8,000 is included in
operating expense.

Note D - Contingencies

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
In addition,  during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint  captioned Heller v.
Insignia  Financial  Group (the  "Heller  action")  was filed  against  the same
defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action.  On or about  August 6, 2001,
plaintiffs filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller action was brought as a
purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach
of fiduciary  duty,  unfair  competition,  conversion,  unjust  enrichment,  and
judicial  dissolution.  On January 28, 2002, the trial court granted  defendants
motion to strike the complaint.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

On June 13, 2003, the court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
("Objector") filed an appeal (the "Appeal") seeking to vacate and/or reverse the
order approving the settlement and entering judgment thereto. On May 4, 2004 the
Objector filed a second appeal  challenging the court's use of a referee and its
order requiring Objector to pay those fees.

On March 21, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued opinions in both pending appeals.
With regard to the settlement and judgment entered thereto, the Court of Appeals
vacated  the trial  court's  order and  remanded  to the trial court for further
findings  on the basis that the "state of the record is  insufficient  to permit
meaningful  appellate  review".  With regard to the second appeal,  the Court of
Appeals  reversed the order requiring the Objector to pay referee fees. On April
26, 2005,  the Court of Appeals  lifted the stay of a pending  appeal related to
the Heller action and the trial court's order striking the  complaint.  On April
28, 2005, the Objector  filed a Petition for Review with the California  Supreme
Court in connection with the opinion vacating the order approving settlement and
remanding for further findings.  The Managing General Partner and its affiliates
are  currently  scheduled  to file an answer to  Objector's  petition on May 18,
2005.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

AIMCO  Properties  L.P.  and NHP  Management  Company,  both  affiliates  of the
Managing  General  Partner,  are  defendants  in a  lawsuit  alleging  that they
willfully  violated  the Fair Labor  Standards  Act  ("FLSA")  by failing to pay
maintenance  workers  overtime for all hours worked in excess of forty per week.
The complaint  attempts to bring a collective action under the FLSA and seeks to
certify state subclasses in California,  Maryland, and the District of Columbia.
Specifically,  the  plaintiffs  contend  that  AIMCO  Properties  L.P.  and  NHP
Management Company failed to compensate  maintenance  workers for time that they
were  required  to be  "on-call."  Additionally,  the  complaint  alleges  AIMCO
Properties  L.P. and NHP  Management  Company  failed to comply with the FLSA in
compensating  maintenance  workers for time that they worked in  responding to a
call  while  "on-call."  The  defendants  have  filed an answer  to the  amended
complaint  denying the substantive  allegations.  Oral argument  relating to the
certification  of the  collective  action  took  place  on May 12,  2005 and the
parties await a ruling from the Court. Although the outcome of any litigation is
uncertain,  AIMCO  Properties,  L.P. does not believe that the ultimate  outcome
will have a material  adverse  effect on its  financial  condition or results of
operations.  Similarly,  the Managing  General Partner does not believe that the
ultimate  outcome  will have a  material  adverse  effect  on the  Partnership's
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

The  Partnership  is unaware  of any other  pending  or  outstanding  litigation
matters  involving  it or its  investment  properties  that are not of a routine
nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

Environmental

Various  Federal,  state and local laws subject  property owners or operators to
liability for management,  and the costs of removal or  remediation,  of certain
hazardous  substances  present on a property.  Such laws often impose  liability
without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for,
the release or presence of the  hazardous  substances.  The  presence of, or the
failure to manage or remedy properly,  hazardous substances may adversely affect
occupancy at affected  apartment  communities and the ability to sell or finance
affected properties.  In addition to the costs associated with investigation and
remediation  actions brought by government  agencies,  the presence of hazardous
substances  on a  property  could  result in claims by  private  plaintiffs  for
personal injury,  disease,  disability or other  infirmities.  Various laws also
impose  liability for the cost of removal,  remediation or disposal of hazardous
substances  through a  licensed  disposal  or  treatment  facility.  Anyone  who
arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous  substances  is  potentially
liable  under such laws.  These laws often impose  liability  whether or not the
person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal  facility.
In connection with the ownership and operation of its property,  the Partnership
could  potentially be liable for  environmental  liabilities or costs associated
with its property.

Mold

The Partnership is aware of lawsuits  against owners and managers of multifamily
properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the
presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial  monetary judgments
or settlements. The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage for property
damage loss claims  arising from the  presence of mold and for  personal  injury
claims related to mold exposure. Affiliates of the Managing General Partner have
implemented a national  policy and  procedures to prevent or eliminate mold from
its properties  and the Managing  General  Partner  believes that these measures
will  eliminate,  or at least  minimize,  the  effects  that mold  could have on
residents.  To date,  the  Partnership  has not incurred  any material  costs or
liabilities  relating to claims of mold  exposure  or to abate mold  conditions.
Because the law  regarding  mold is unsettled and subject to change the Managing
General  Partner  can make no  assurance  that  liabilities  resulting  from the
presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material  adverse  effect on the
Partnership's financial condition or results of operations.

SEC Investigation

The  Central  Regional  Office of the  United  States  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission (the "SEC") is conducting a formal investigation  relating to certain
matters.  Although  the staff of the SEC is not limited in the areas that it may
investigate,   AIMCO  believes  the  areas  of  investigation   include  AIMCO's
miscalculated   monthly  net  rental  income  figures  in  third  quarter  2003,
forecasted  guidance,  accounts  payable,  rent  concessions,   vendor  rebates,
capitalization  of payroll and certain other costs and tax credit  transactions.
At the end of the first quarter of 2005, the SEC added certain tender offers for
limited partnership interests as an area of investigation.  AIMCO is cooperating
fully.  AIMCO is not able to predict  when the  investigation  will be resolved.
AIMCO does not believe  that the ultimate  outcome will have a material  adverse
effect  on its  consolidated  financial  condition  or  results  of  operations.
Similarly,  the  Managing  General  Partner  does not believe  that the ultimate
outcome will have a material  adverse effect on the  Partnership's  consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.

<PAGE>

ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  Actual results may differ materially
from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a
variety of risks and factors including,  without limitation:  national and local
economic  conditions;  the terms of  governmental  regulations  that  affect the
Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment
in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks, including the risk that cash
flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal
and interest;  real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and
the general  economic  climate in local markets and  competition  for tenants in
such markets;  litigation,  including  costs  associated  with  prosecuting  and
defending  claims  and  any  adverse   outcomes,   and  possible   environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment properties,  excluding one property held for sale,
consist of six apartment  complexes.  The following table sets forth the average
occupancy of the properties for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:

                                                   Average Occupancy
      Property                                      2005       2004

      Sunrunner Apartments (1)                      98%        87%
         St. Petersburg, Florida
      Vinings Peak Apartments (1)                   96%        86%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Plantation Crossing                           90%        88%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Wood Lake Apartments (1)                      94%        90%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Greenspoint Apartments (1)                    92%        86%
         Phoenix, Arizona
      Sandspoint Apartments (2)                     76%        90%
         Phoenix, Arizona

   (1)      The Managing General Partner attributes the increase in occupancy at
            Sunrunner,  Vinings Peak, Wood Lake, and  Greenspoint  Apartments to
            favorable market conditions and increased marketing efforts by local
            management.

   (2)      The Managing General Partner attributes the decrease in occupancy at
            Sandspoint  Apartments to increased credit standards for prospective
            tenants.

The  Partnership's  financial  results depend upon a number of factors including
the  ability to attract  and  maintain  tenants  at the  investment  properties,
interest  rates on mortgage  loans,  costs  incurred  to operate the  investment
properties,  general  economic  conditions  and weather.  As part of the ongoing
business plan of the  Partnership,  the Managing  General  Partner  monitors the
rental market environment of its investment properties to assess the feasibility
of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing  occupancy levels and protecting
the Partnership  from increases in expenses.  As part of this plan, the Managing
General  Partner  attempts  to  protect  the  Partnership  from  the  burden  of
inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and  maintaining a
high overall  occupancy  level.  However,  the Managing  General Partner may use
rental  concessions  and  rental  rate  reductions  to offset  softening  market
conditions, accordingly, there is no guarantee that the Managing General Partner
will be able to  sustain  such a plan.  Further,  a number of  factors  that are
outside the control of the  Partnership  such as the local economic  climate and
weather can adversely or positively affect the Partnership's financial results.

Results of Operations

The  Partnership's  net loss for the three  months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
was  approximately  $195,000 and $196,000,  respectively.  Although the net loss
remained  constant,  an increase in total  revenues  and a decrease in loss from
discontinued operations was offset by an increase in total expenses.

In  accordance  with  Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standards No. 144, the
accompanying  consolidated  statement of  operations  for the three months ended
March 31,  2004 has been  restated  to reflect  the  operations  of Misty  Woods
Apartments as income (loss) from discontinued operations due to the intention of
the Managing  General Partner to sell the property within one year.  Included in
income (loss) from discontinued  operations for the three months ended March 31,
2005 and 2004 is approximately $335,000 and $314,000,  respectively,  of revenue
generated by the property.

Excluding  the impact of the income  (loss) from  discontinued  operations,  the
Partnership's  loss from continuing  operations for the three months ended March
31, 2005 and 2004 was  approximately  $230,000 and $139,000,  respectively.  The
increase in loss from continuing operations for the three month period is due to
an increase in total expenses partially offset by an increase in total revenues.

Total  expenses  for the three  months  ended  March 31, 2005  increased  due to
increases in operating and deprecation expenses. Operating expense increased due
to increases in property and maintenance  expenses.  Property expense  increased
due to  increases  in payroll and related  benefits at all of the  Partnership's
investment  properties.  Maintenance  expense  increased  due  to  increases  in
contract  labor and parts and  supplies  at five of the  investment  properties.
Depreciation expense increased due to fixed assets placed into service at all of
the investment properties.

The increase in total  revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2005 is due
to an increase in rental income and due to the recognition of a casualty gain in
2005 partially offset by a decrease in other income. Rental income increased due
to an increase in occupancy at five of the investment  properties and a decrease
in bad debt  expense at all of the  investment  properties  partially  offset by
decreases in occupancy at Sandspoint Apartments and in the average rental rates,
primarily at Vinings Peak and Wood Lake  Apartments.  Other income decreased due
to decreases in lease  cancellation  fees at all of the  investment  properties,
cleaning  and damage fees at  Greenspoint  and  Sandspoint  Apartments  and late
charges at four of the investment  properties partially offset by an increase in
tenant reimbursements at all of the investment properties.

In December 2004, one of the Partnership's  investment properties,  Vinings Peak
Apartments,  incurred  damages as a result of a fire. As a result of the damage,
approximately  $23,000 of fixed assets and approximately  $16,000 of accumulated
depreciation  were written off during the three months ended March 31, 2005. The
property received  approximately  $23,000 in proceeds from the insurance company
to repair the damaged  units and  recognized  a casualty  gain of  approximately
$16,000 as a result of the difference  between the proceeds received and the net
book value of the buildings which were damaged.

Included in general and administrative  expense for the three months ended March
31, 2005 and 2004 are management  reimbursements to the Managing General Partner
as allowed  under the  Partnership  Agreement.  Also  included  in  general  and
administrative  expenses  are costs  associated  with the  quarterly  and annual
communications  with  investors  and  regulatory  agencies  and the annual audit
required by the Partnership Agreement.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  March  31,  2005,  the  Partnership   had  cash  and  cash   equivalents  of
approximately $535,000 compared to approximately $462,000 at March, 31 2004. For
the three  months  ended March 31,  2005,  cash and cash  equivalents  increased
approximately  $11,000 from December 31, 2004 due to  approximately  $565,000 of
cash provided by operating activities partially offset by approximately $365,000
of cash used in investing activities and approximately  $189,000 of cash used in
financing  activities.  Net  cash  used in  investing  activities  consisted  of
property  improvements and replacements,  partially offset by insurance proceeds
received and  withdrawals  from restricted  escrows.  Net cash used in financing
activities  consisted of principal  payments on the  mortgages  encumbering  the
Partnership's  properties  partially offset by advances from an affiliate of the
Managing General Partner.  The Partnership  invests its working capital reserves
in interest bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures  required at the  properties  to  adequately  maintain the physical
assets and other  operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal,
state, and local legal and regulatory requirements. The Managing General Partner
monitors  developments  in the  area of legal  and  regulatory  compliance.  For
example,  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  mandates  or  suggests  additional
compliance  measures  with  regard to  governance,  disclosure,  audit and other
areas.  In light of these changes,  the  Partnership  expects that it will incur
higher expenses related to compliance.  Capital improvements planned for each of
the Partnership's properties are detailed below.

Wood Lake Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2005,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $38,000  of  capital  improvements  at  the  property  consisting
primarily  of  structural   upgrades,   fitness  equipment  and  floor  covering
replacements.  These  improvements  were funded from  operating  cash flow.  The
Partnership  regularly  evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property.
While the Partnership has no material commitments for property  improvements and
replacements,  certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2005.
Such capital  expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property
as well as  replacement  reserves  and  anticipated  cash flow  generated by the
property.

Greenspoint Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2005,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $74,000  of  capital  improvements  at  the  property  consisting
primarily  of parking lot  resurfacing,  plumbing  fixtures  and floor  covering
replacements.  These  improvements  were funded from  operating  cash flow.  The
Partnership  regularly  evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property.
While the Partnership has no material commitments for property  improvements and
replacements,  certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2005.
Such capital  expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property
as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Sandspoint Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2005,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $85,000  of  capital  improvements  at  the  property  consisting
primarily of structural  upgrades,  parking area improvements and floor covering
replacements.  These  improvements  were funded from  operating  cash flow.  The
Partnership  regularly  evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property.
While the Partnership has no material commitments for property  improvements and
replacements,  certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2005.
Such capital  expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property
as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Vinings Peak Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2005,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $98,000  of  capital  improvements  at  the  property  consisting
primarily of  structural  upgrades,  casualty  repairs,  and floor  covering and
appliance replacements.  These improvements were funded from operating cash flow
and  insurance  proceeds.   The  Partnership  regularly  evaluates  the  capital
improvement  needs  of the  property.  While  the  Partnership  has no  material
commitments for property improvements and replacements,  certain routine capital
expenditures are anticipated during 2005. Such capital  expenditures will depend
on the physical  condition of the property as well as  replacement  reserves and
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Plantation Crossing Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2005,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $28,000  of  capital  improvements  at  the  property  consisting
primarily of floor covering and appliance replacements.  These improvements were
funded  from  operating  cash flow and  replacement  reserves.  The  Partnership
regularly  evaluates the capital  improvement  needs of the property.  While the
Partnership  has  no  material   commitments  for  property   improvements   and
replacements,  certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2005.
Such capital  expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property
as well as  replacement  reserves  and  anticipated  cash flow  generated by the
property.

Sunrunner Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2005,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $10,000  of  capital  improvements  at  the  property  consisting
primarily  of air  conditioning  unit and  floor  covering  replacements.  These
improvements  were funded from operating cash flow.  The  Partnership  regularly
evaluates the capital  improvement needs of the property.  While the Partnership
has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements,  certain
routine  capital   expenditures  are  anticipated   during  2005.  Such  capital
expenditures  will depend on the  physical  condition of the property as well as
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Misty Woods Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2005,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately   $1,000  of  capital  improvements  at  the  property  consisting
primarily of floor covering  replacements.  These  improvements were funded from
operating cash flow. The Managing General Partner intends to sell the property.

Capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations
or from  Partnership  reserves.  To the extent  that  capital  improvements  are
completed,  the Partnership's  distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely
affected at least in the short term.

The  Partnership's  assets  are  thought  to be  generally  sufficient  for  any
near-term needs  (exclusive of capital  improvements)  of the  Partnership.  The
mortgage   indebtedness   encumbering   Sunrunner  Apartments  of  approximately
$4,229,000  matures in September 2021, at which time the loan is scheduled to be
fully  amortized.   The  mortgage  indebtedness   encumbering   Greenspoint  and
Sandspoint Apartments of approximately $16,890,000 matures in June 2005 at which
time balloon  payments of approximately  $16,862,000 are required.  The Managing
General  Partner  intends to  refinance  the  indebtedness  of  Greenspoint  and
Sandspoint   Apartments  before  their  maturity  in  June  2005.  The  mortgage
indebtedness  encumbering  Vinings  Peak,  Plantation  Crossing  and Woods  Lake
Apartments  of  approximately  $19,335,000  matures  in July 2013 at which  time
balloon payments of approximately $12,521,000 are required. The Managing General
Partner will attempt to refinance such  indebtedness  and/or sell the properties
prior to such maturity dates. If any property cannot be refinanced or sold for a
sufficient  amount,  the  Partnership  will risk  losing such  property  through
foreclosure.

The following table sets forth the distributions made by the Partnership for the
three months March 31, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands, except per unit data):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                         Per Limited                      Per Limited
                    Three Months Ended   Partnership  Three Months Ended  Partnership
                      March 31, 2005        Unit        March 31, 2004        Unit

<S>                        <C>              <C>              <C>             <C>
Operations                 $ --             $ --             $ 600           $ 5.92
</TABLE>

Future cash  distributions  will depend on the levels of net cash generated from
operations, the availability of cash reserves and the timing of debt maturities,
property  sales  and/or  refinancings.  The  Partnership's  cash  available  for
distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. There can be no assurance, however,
that the  Partnership  will  generate  sufficient  funds from  operations  after
required  capital  expenditures to permit any  distributions  to its partners in
2005 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 53,731.66 limited partnership units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 60.18% of the outstanding Units at
March 31, 2005. A number of these Units were acquired  pursuant to tender offers
made by AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is possible  that AIMCO or its  affiliates
will acquire  additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and
units in AIMCO  Properties,  L.P., the operating  partnership  of AIMCO,  either
through  private  purchases or tender  offers.  In this regard,  on February 16,
2005, AIMCO Properties,  L.P.,  commenced a tender offer to acquire up to 35,560
Units for a purchase price of $300.00 per Unit. This offer expires May 31, 2005.
Pursuant to the  Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders  holding a majority of the
Units are  entitled  to take action  with  respect to a variety of matters  that
include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership
Agreement and voting to remove the Managing General Partner.  As a result of its
ownership of 60.18% of the outstanding  Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a
position to influence all such voting decisions with respect to the Partnership.
However, with respect to the 25,228.66 Units acquired on January 19, 1996, AIMCO
IPLP, L.P. ("IPLP"),  an affiliate of the Managing General Partner and of AIMCO,
agreed to vote such Units:  (i) against any increase in compensation  payable to
the Managing General Partner or to its affiliates; and (ii) on all other matters
submitted by it or its affiliates, in proportion to the vote cast by third party
unitholders.  Except for the  foregoing,  no other  limitations  are  imposed on
IPLP's,  AIMCO's or any other affiliates' right to vote each Unit held. Although
the Managing  General Partner owes fiduciary  duties to the limited  partners of
the  Partnership,  the Managing  General  Partner also owes fiduciary  duties to
AIMCO as its sole stockholder.  As a result,  the duties of the Managing General
Partner,  as  managing  general  partner,  to the  Partnership  and its  limited
partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Managing  General Partner
to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles   generally  accepted  in  the  United  States,   which  require  the
Partnership to make estimates and assumptions.  The Partnership believes that of
its significant  accounting policies,  the following may involve a higher degree
of judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The investment  properties are recorded at cost, less accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying amount of the property may be impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's investment properties.  These factors include, but are not limited
to,  changes  in the  national,  regional  and  local  economic  climate;  local
conditions,  such as an oversupply of multifamily  properties;  competition from
other available  multifamily property owners and changes in market rental rates.
Any adverse changes in these factors could cause impairment of the Partnership's
assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or
in response  to heavy  competition  from other  similar  complexes  in the area.
Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a
straight-line  basis over the term of the lease.  The Partnership  evaluates all
accounts  receivable  from  residents and  establishes  an allowance,  after the
application of security deposits,  for accounts greater than 30 days past due on
current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.

ITEM 3.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Partnership's management,  with the
participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Managing  General  Partner,  who are the equivalent of the  Partnership's
principal executive officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  has
evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)  under the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end
of the period covered by this report.  Based on such  evaluation,  the principal
executive  officer  and  principal  financial  officer of the  Managing  General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and principal  financial officer,  respectively,  have concluded that, as of the
end of such period,  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls and procedures are
effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial  Reporting.  There have not been any changes
in the Partnership's  internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules  13a-15(f)  and  15d-15(f)  under the Exchange  Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have  materially  affected,  or
are reasonably likely to materially affect,  the Partnership's  internal control
over financial reporting.


<PAGE>


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
In addition,  during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint  captioned Heller v.
Insignia  Financial  Group (the  "Heller  action")  was filed  against  the same
defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action.  On or about  August 6, 2001,
plaintiffs filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller action was brought as a
purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach
of fiduciary  duty,  unfair  competition,  conversion,  unjust  enrichment,  and
judicial  dissolution.  On January 28, 2002, the trial court granted  defendants
motion to strike the complaint.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

On June 13, 2003, the court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
("Objector") filed an appeal (the "Appeal") seeking to vacate and/or reverse the
order approving the settlement and entering judgment thereto. On May 4, 2004 the
Objector filed a second appeal  challenging the court's use of a referee and its
order requiring Objector to pay those fees.

On March 21, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued opinions in both pending appeals.
With regard to the settlement and judgment entered thereto, the Court of Appeals
vacated  the trial  court's  order and  remanded  to the trial court for further
findings  on the basis that the "state of the record is  insufficient  to permit
meaningful  appellate  review".  With regard to the second appeal,  the Court of
Appeals  reversed the order requiring the Objector to pay referee fees. On April
26, 2005,  the Court of Appeals  lifted the stay of a pending  appeal related to
the Heller action and the trial court's order striking the  complaint.  On April
28, 2005, the Objector  filed a Petition for Review with the California  Supreme
Court in connection with the opinion vacating the order approving settlement and
remanding for further findings.  The Managing General Partner and its affiliates
are  currently  scheduled  to file an answer to  Objector's  petition on May 18,
2005.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

AIMCO  Properties  L.P.  and NHP  Management  Company,  both  affiliates  of the
Managing  General  Partner,  are  defendants  in a  lawsuit  alleging  that they
willfully  violated  the Fair Labor  Standards  Act  ("FLSA")  by failing to pay
maintenance  workers  overtime for all hours worked in excess of forty per week.
The complaint  attempts to bring a collective action under the FLSA and seeks to
certify state subclasses in California,  Maryland, and the District of Columbia.
Specifically,  the  plaintiffs  contend  that  AIMCO  Properties  L.P.  and  NHP
Management Company failed to compensate  maintenance  workers for time that they
were  required  to be  "on-call."  Additionally,  the  complaint  alleges  AIMCO
Properties  L.P. and NHP  Management  Company  failed to comply with the FLSA in
compensating  maintenance  workers for time that they worked in  responding to a
call  while  "on-call."  The  defendants  have  filed an answer  to the  amended
complaint  denying the substantive  allegations.  Oral argument  relating to the
certification  of the  collective  action  took  place  on May 12,  2005 and the
parties await a ruling from the Court. Although the outcome of any litigation is
uncertain,  AIMCO  Properties,  L.P. does not believe that the ultimate  outcome
will have a material  adverse  effect on its  financial  condition or results of
operations.  Similarly,  the Managing  General Partner does not believe that the
ultimate  outcome  will have a  material  adverse  effect  on the  Partnership's
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

The  Partnership  is unaware  of any other  pending  or  outstanding  litigation
matters  involving  it or its  investment  properties  that are not of a routine
nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

ITEM 5.     OTHER INFORMATION

            None.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS

            See Exhibit Index.



<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX


                                    By:   FOX PARTNERS II
                                          Its General Partner


                                    By:   FOX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
                                          Its Managing General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                          Stephen B. Waters
                                          Vice President


                                    Date: May 16, 2005





<PAGE>


                       CENTURY PROPERTIES INCOME FUND XIX
                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit Number    Description of Exhibit


       2.1        NPI,  Inc.  Stock  Purchase  Agreement,  dated as of August 7,
                  1995,  incorporated by reference to the  Registrant's  Current
                  Report on Form 8-K dated August 7, 1995.

       2.2        Partnership  Units Purchase  Agreement  dated as of August 17,
                  1995,  incorporated  by  reference  to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K
                  filed by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") with the
                  Securities and Exchange Commission on September 1, 1995.

       2.3        Management  Purchase  Agreement  dated as of August 17,  1995,
                  incorporated  by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Form 8-K filed by
                  Insignia  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on
                  September 1, 1995.

       2.4        Agreement and Plan of Merger,  dated as of October 1, 1998, by
                  and  between  AIMCO  and IPT  (incorporated  by  reference  to
                  Exhibit 2.1 of  Registrant's  Current Report on Form 8-K dated
                  October 1, 1998).

       3.4        Agreement of Limited Partnership, incorporated by reference to
                  Exhibit A to the Prospectus of the Partnership dated September
                  20,  1983,  as amended  on June 13,  1989,  and as  thereafter
                  supplemented   contained  in  the  Registrant's   Registration
                  Statement on Form S-11 (Reg. No. 2-79007).

       3.5        Amendment  to the Amended  and  Restated  Limited  Partnership
                  Agreement, dated September 29, 2003, incorporated by reference
                  to Exhibit 3.5 on Form 8-K dated September 29, 2003.

      10.7        First  Mortgage Note from the  Registrant to Secore  Financial
                  Corporation  ("Secore")  relating to the  refinancing of Misty
                  Woods Apartments  incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to
                  the  Partnership's  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K for the year
                  ended December 31, 1995.

      10.8        First Mortgage and Security Agreement dated as of December 29,
                  1995,   from  the   Registrant  to  Secore   relating  to  the
                  refinancing  of  Misty  Woods   Apartments   incorporated   by
                  reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Partnership  Annual Report on
                  Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.

      10.12       Multifamily Note dated August 30, 2001 between GMAC Commercial
                  Mortgage  Corporation and Century  Properties Fund XIX for the
                  refinance of Sunrunner  Apartments,  incorporated by reference
                  to Exhibit 10.12 on Form 8-K dated August 30, 2001.

      10.13       Multifamily  Note for  $4,480,000  dated June 25, 2003 between
                  Century  Properties  Fund XIX and KeyCorp Real Estate  Capital
                  Markets,  Inc.,  incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to
                  Form 8-K dated June 25, 2003.

      10.14       Replacement  Reserve  Agreement  dated June 25,  2003  between
                  Century  Properties  Fund XIX and KeyCorp Real Estate  Capital
                  Markets,  Inc.,  incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to
                  Form 8-K dated June 25, 2003.

      10.15       Repair Escrow  Agreement  dated June 25, 2003 between  Century
                  Properties  Fund XIX and KeyCorp Real Estate Capital  Markets,
                  Inc.,  incorporated  by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Form 8-K
                  dated June 25, 2003.

      10.16       Multifamily  Note for  $8,470,000  dated June 25, 2003 between
                  Century  Properties  Fund XIX and KeyCorp Real Estate  Capital
                  Markets,  Inc.,  incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to
                  Form 8-K dated June 25, 2003.

      10.17       Replacement  Reserve  Agreement  dated June 25,  2003  between
                  Century  Properties  Fund XIX and KeyCorp Real Estate  Capital
                  Markets,  Inc.,  incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to
                  Form 8-K dated June 25, 2003.

      10.18       Repair Escrow  Agreement  dated June 25, 2003 between  Century
                  Properties  Fund XIX and KeyCorp Real Estate Capital  Markets,
                  Inc.,  incorporated  by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Form 8-K
                  dated June 25, 2003.

      10.19       Multifamily  Note for  $7,500,000  dated June 25, 2003 between
                  Century  Properties  Fund XIX and KeyCorp Real Estate  Capital
                  Markets,  Inc.,  incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to
                  Form 8-K dated June 25, 2003.

      10.20       Replacement  Reserve  Agreement  dated June 25,  2003  between
                  Century  Properties  Fund XIX and KeyCorp Real Estate  Capital
                  Markets,  Inc.,  incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to
                  Form 8-K dated June 25, 2003.

      10.21       Repair Escrow  Agreement  dated June 25, 2003 between  Century
                  Properties  Fund XIX and KeyCorp Real Estate Capital  Markets,
                  Inc.,  incorporated  by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Form 8-K
                  dated June 25, 2003.

      31.1        Certification  of  equivalent  of  Chief  Executive  Officer
                  pursuant     to     Securities     Exchange     Act    Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      31.2        Certification  of  equivalent  of  Chief  Financial  Officer
                  pursuant     to     Securities     Exchange     Act    Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      32.1        Certification of the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
                  and Chief  Financial  Officer  Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section
                  1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
                  Act of 2002.


<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Martha L. Long, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Century Properties
      Fund XIX;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the small  business  issuer as of, and for, the periods  presented in this
      report;

4.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are
      responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the small business issuer and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            small business issuer, including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is
            made  known to us by  others  within  those  entities,  particularly
            during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated  the   effectiveness   of  the  small  business   issuer's
            disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our
            conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and
            procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
            on such evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's
            internal  control over financial  reporting that occurred during the
            small  business  issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the small
            business  issuer's  fourth  fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual
            report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to
            materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
            financial reporting; and

5.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I  have
      disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control over
      financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
      committee of the small  business  issuer's  board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely  affect the small business  issuer's
            ability  to  record,   process,   summarize  and  report   financial
            information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees who have a significant  role in the small  business
            issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 16, 2005

                                    /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Martha L. Long
                                    Senior   Vice   President   of  Fox  Capital
                                    Management  Corporation,  equivalent  of the
                                    chief executive officer of the Partnership


<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Century Properties
      Fund XIX;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the small  business  issuer as of, and for, the periods  presented in this
      report;

4.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are
      responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the small business issuer and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            small business issuer, including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is
            made  known to us by  others  within  those  entities,  particularly
            during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated  the   effectiveness   of  the  small  business   issuer's
            disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our
            conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and
            procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
            on such evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's
            internal  control over financial  reporting that occurred during the
            small  business  issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the small
            business  issuer's  fourth  fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual
            report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to
            materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
            financial reporting; and

5.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I  have
      disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control over
      financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
      committee of the small  business  issuer's  board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely  affect the small business  issuer's
            ability  to  record,   process,   summarize  and  report   financial
            information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees who have a significant  role in the small  business
            issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 16, 2005

                                    /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                    Stephen B. Waters
                                    Vice President of Fox Capital Management
                                    Corporation, equivalent of the chief
                                    financial officer of the Partnership




<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Century  Properties
Fund XIX (the  "Partnership"),  for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive  officer of
the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial
officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:


      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Name:  Martha L. Long
                                    Date:  May 16, 2005


                                           /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                    Name:  Stephen B. Waters
                                    Date:  May 16, 2005


This  certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.