alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Schaeffer, John

From: Lin, Chuantung

Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 11:02 AM

To: Schaeffer, John

Cc: Mattheisen, Mike; Brooks, David; Williamson, Tracy; Christian, Myrta

Subject: RE: 6381-77-7 HPV2--request for EETD review of Log Kow study

Hi John 

I have reviewed the test protocols and the results (for Log Kow endpoint) the submitter for 6381-77-7. The 

methodologies and the test results are adequate and acceptable to EPA to fulfill the test requirements for this HPV2 test 

substance. 

Please let me know if you have any question. 

Thanks! 

Daniel 

Daniel (Chuantung) Lin, Ph.D. 

Chemist, Industrial Chemistry Branch 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

US EPA 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW (7406M) 

[Deliveries to: 1201 Constitution Ave., NW, EPA East (WJC) 5133E] 

Washington, DC 20460 

202-564-8584 (direct) 

202-564-8740 (branch) 

202-564-8679 (fax) 

From: Schaeffer, John 

Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 8:29 AM 

To: Lin, Chuantung 

Cc: Mattheisen, Mike; Brooks, David 

Subject: 6381-77-7 HPV2--request for EETD review of Log Kow study 

Daniel, good morning. 

Please review for data adequacy the attached study determining the n-octanol/water partition coefficient for CASRN 

6381-77-7, an HPV2 test rule chemical. 

Thank you. 

John 

John Schaeffer 

Senior Biologist 

USEPA/OPPT/CCD/CITB 

1201 Constitution Ave, NW 
2

Washington, DC 20460 

Mail Code: 7405M 

Phone: 202-564-8173
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1369.html[7/23/2015 6:24:13 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvl-60sr

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1369

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jack Bailey

Address:

4168 Asheland Cove Dr

Young Harris, GA, 30582

Email: baileyjack44@gmail.com

General Comment

I am capable and able to manage my own retirement moneys, and I do not need or want the government or any

 other agency or person controlling it for me ever.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0844.html[7/21/2015 4:07:55 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-ltuv

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0844

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I can plan for my own retirement!
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D2022-2929 

L.T. Case No. 2018-CA-002503

_____________________________

DAIMON MCNAMARA, 

Appellant, 

v.

CLEVELAND CONSTRUCTION,

INCORPORATED OF NEVADA AND 

BENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 

COMPANY, LLC, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County. 

Christopher M. Sprysenski, Judge. 

Nicholas A. Shannin, of Shannin Law Firm, Orlando, for 

Appellant. 

Kevin D. Franz, of Boyd & Jenerette, Miami, for Appellee. 

July 16, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SOUD, BOATWRIGHT, and MACIVER, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
1210-AB32-2-1222.html[7/24/2015 8:47:42 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvs-o7cj

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1717

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I am sick of Obama and all his administration. Leave our retirement accounts alone.!!!
From: Charles Valentine [mailto:Charles.Valentine@verizon.net] 

Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 11:01 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comments on Parity in Mental Health Legislation

Please accept my letter, attached below, commenting on upcoming 

Parity legislation regarding EEG Biofeedback. 

Thank You, 

Dr. Charles A. Valentine 
Re: Comments regarding Regulatory Guidance USCG-2007-27022 

page 19157, II B specific areas 1 and 4

Greetings: 

I am a clinical psychologist in private practice who provides EEG biofeedback treatment 

to individuals with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Mood Disorders. EEG 

biofeedback is an empirically validated and widely recognized effective non medication 

treatment for ADHD, as well as other conditions. There are over 50 studies evaluating 

the effectiveness of EEG biofeedback in the treatment of ADHD, Substance Use 

disorders and Autism. A recent review of this literature concluded “EEG biofeedback 

meets the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry criteria for” Clinical 

Guidelines “for treatment of ADHD.” This means that EEG biofeedback meets the same 

criteria as to medication for treating ADHD, and that EEG biofeedback “should always 

be considered as an intervention for this disorder by the clinician.” From my own 

experience, and that of colleagues, we have discovered that; Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, 

United Behavioral Health, Blue Cross, Cigna, and Amerigroup have denied this service.

This is limitation of an effective and validated treatment for a mental health problem. 

The reasons given by the insurance companies for this denial fell into two categories: 1) 

our company does not cover biofeedback for Mental Health problems or 2) there is not 

yet sufficient evidence for the efficacy of EEG biofeedback. As such, they are using 

evidence-based criteria that are far more restrictive for mental health services than the 

criteria that are used for medical/surgical services. There are many routine medical and 

surgical procedures that have far fewer controlled studies about their efficacy than does 

EEG biofeedback. These medical and surgical procedures are generally not limited 

because of concerns about how many controlled studies have been performed about them. 

We believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity statue should 

require that employers and plans pay for the same range and scope of services for 

Behavioral Treatments as they do for Med Surg benefits and that a plan cannot be more 

restrictive in their managed care criteria and reviews for MH and SA disorders when 

compared to Med Surg. Today plans are being more restrictive in how they review 

evidenced based Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatments when compared to Med 

Surg treatments. This violates both the intent and letter of the parity statue and we hope 

that the regulations will clarify that this can't continue. 

Respectfully yours, 

Charles A. Valentine, Psy.D. 

Clinical Psychologist 

Valentine & Associates 

34 Eliot Memorial Rd. 

Newton, MA 02458
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, August 4, 1995 (109), Para 109.23 Message from the President]
[Page 1293]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.109.23  message from the president

  A further message in writing from the President of the United States 
was communicated to the House by Mr. Edwin Thomas, one of his 
secretaries.
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 179 (Monday, September 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52896-52897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4575]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Defense against pathogens.
    Date: October 19, 2007.
    Time: 11:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, Room <greek-i> 3118, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sujata Vijh, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID/
NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
594-0985, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a2c333032291a34333b333e74343332743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f3859a999b80b39d9a929a97dd9d9a9bdd949c85">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 52897]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 7, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-4575 Filed 9-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 99.1



Statement of Chief Executive Officer

of

Berger Holdings, Ltd. (the
Company)



I, Joseph F. Weiderman, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Report presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   
|-------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2003
|
Unassociated Document


     

    Exhibit
      10.2

    


    DTLL

    


     

    March
      23,
      2006

    


    Board
      of
      Directors

    GRAND
      SIERRA RESORTS

    3468
      Rice
      Street

    Vadnais
      Heights MN 55126

    


    RE:
      Proposed Transaction

    


    Dear
      Members of the Board,

    


    This
      letter is to extend the deadline of the offer of a proposed transaction, as
      outlined in the letter dated March 15, 2006 and amended in a letter dated March
      17, 2006.

    


    We
      will
      keep the terms and conditions of the offer as outlined in the letters.


    


    We
      look
      forward to working with the company to close this transaction and agree to
      keep
      this offer open until 5 pm EST on Tuesday April 4, 2006.

    


    Sincerely,

    


    


    
 

    Dual
      Cooper

    President

    


    
 

    


    


    


    Destination
      Travel Leisure International

    1650
      West 82nd
      Street, Suite 1200, Bloomington, MN 55431
# Assignment of Reporting Functions Relating to the Information Sharing Environment

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary of Defense[,] the Attorney General[,] the Secretary of Energy[,] the Secretary of Homeland Security[, and] the Director of National Intelligence 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, the reporting functions of the President under subsections (h) and (j) of section 1016 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-458), as amended by the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-53) (IRTPA), are hereby assigned to the Director of National Intelligence (Director). The Director shall consult the Secretaries of State, Defense, Energy, Homeland Security, and the Attorney General in performing such functions. 

Heads of departments and agencies shall, to the extent permitted by law, furnish to the Director information that the Director requests to perform such functions, in the format and on the schedule specified by the Director. 

The Director shall perform such functions in a manner consistent with the President's constitutional authority to withhold information the disclosure of which could impair foreign relations, national security, the deliberative processes of the Executive, and the performance of the Executive's constitutional duties. 

Any reference in this memorandum to the provision of IRTPA shall be deemed to include references to any hereafter-enacted provision of law that is the same or substantially the same as such provision. 

                        The Director is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

[FR Doc. 07-4549

Billing code 3910-A7-M
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.306 What are the consequences of furnishing misleading information or making a false statement in connection with the registration process? A carrier that furnishes false or misleading information, or conceals material information in connection with the registration process, is subject to the following actions: ( a ) Revocation of registration.
( b ) Assessment of the civil and/or criminal penalties prescribed in 49 U.S.C. 521 and 49 U.S.C. chapter 149.
[73 FR 76488, Dec. 16, 2008]
§ 37.195 Purchase or lease of OTRBs by private entities not primarily in the business of transporting people. This section applies to all purchases or leases of new vehicles by private entities which are not primarily engaged in the business of transporting people, with respect to buses delivered to them on or after the date on which this subpart begins to apply to them. ( a ) *Fixed-route systems.* If the entity operates a fixed-route system and purchases or leases an OTRB for or in contemplation of use on the system, it shall meet the requirements of § 37.183 (a) or (b), as applicable.
( b ) *Demand-responsive systems.* The requirements of § 37.189 apply to demand-responsive systems operated by private entities not primarily in the business of transporting people. If such an entity operates a demand-responsive system, and purchases or leases an OTRB for or in contemplation of use on the system, it is not required to purchase or lease an accessible bus except as needed to meet the requirements of § 37.189.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsExtension of a noninteractive reliability model for ceramic matrix compositesDevelopments in the processing of high temperature ceramic composites demand innovative and progressive design protocols that adequately predict the thermal and mechanical behavior of these materials. The focus here is the extension of a reliability model for orthotropic ceramic composites. The approach chosen to describe failures leads to a noninteractive formulation of reliability that is phenomenological. This particular criterion, which was constructed using tensorial invariant theory, allows six potential failure modes to emerge.Document ID19900016826Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsDuffy, Stephen F.*(Cleveland State Univ. OH., United States)*Wetherhold, Robert C.*(State Univ. of New York Buffalo., United States)*Jain, Lalit K.*(State Univ. of New York Buffalo., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1990Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-185267E-5621NAS 1.26:185267Accession Number90N26142Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC3-89CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-862PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-1BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016826.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 32
 UNITED COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    /S/ Douglas M. McKay
    
    
    
    /S/ James R. ReskeDouglas M. McKay
    
    
    
    James R. Reske, CFAChairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
    
    
    
    (Principal Financial Officer)August 16, 2010
    
    
    
    August 16, 2010
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0911.html[7/21/2015 6:00:07 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-mzjg

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0911

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Eric Vay

General Comment

We the people are smarter than you think we know what reality is we live it everyday. With higher taxes.I know

 I will never be able to retire because of poor decisions that you the government makes and we the people have to

 pay for .leave the decisions to us not you.you the government is so far from reality it's sad from not doing your

 jobs in congress and the Senate tells me how far off you are.that's why you can't make desitions for me.if I don't

 do my job I'm fired you don't do yours you should be fired.not happy with you.there are millions like me.
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | 1. | The                Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March                29,                2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the                date                hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### Russell Dixon, Respondent, *v.*James J. Cozine, Appellant.

*Dixon*v. *Cozine,*134 App. Div. 921, affirmed.

(Submitted April 6, 1911;

decided May 16, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 4, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to compel specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property.

*Charles C. Suffren*for appellant.

*Malcolm Ross Matheson*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook, Chase and Collin, JJ.
#### G. Edgar Allen, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of William H. Gray, Appellant, *v.*William H. Gray, Individually and as Executor of William Gray, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

(Submitted April 24, 1911;

decided May 2, 1911.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 201 N. Y. 504.)
#### Charles W. Pierce, Jr., and others, *Appellants, v.*Charles Bouton, *Respondent.*

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1458.html[7/23/2015 11:19:31 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-i7rn

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1458

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: James Miller

General Comment

You are violating my right of Freedom of Choice and it cannot be enforced. The DOL has no place in the system

 of checks and balances and has no authority to attempt to write Law.