alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.375 How does the initiating official start a PIE proceeding? ( a ) As a service agent, if your compliance matter is not correctable (see § 40.373(a)), or if have not resolved compliance matters as provided in § 40.373(c), the initiating official starts a PIE proceeding by sending you a notice of proposed exclusion (NOPE). The NOPE contains the initiating official's recommendations concerning the issuance of a PIE, but it is not a decision by the Department to issue a PIE.
( b ) The NOPE includes the following information: ( 1 ) A statement that the initiating official is recommending that the Department issue a PIE concerning you;
( 2 ) The factual basis for the initiating official's belief that you are not providing drug and/or alcohol testing services to DOT-regulated employers consistent with the requirements of this part or are in serious noncompliance with a DOT agency drug and alcohol regulation;
( 3 ) The factual basis for the initiating official's belief that your noncompliance has not been or cannot be corrected;
( 4 ) The initiating official's recommendation for the scope of the PIE;
( 5 ) The initiating official's recommendation for the duration of the PIE; and
( 6 ) A statement that you may contest the issuance of the proposed PIE, as provided in § 40.379.
( c ) The initiating official sends a copy of the NOPE to the ODAPC Director at the same time he or she sends the NOPE to you.
§ 380.201 General requirements. ( a ) The LCV Driver-Training Program that is described in Appendix F to this part requires training using an LCV Double or LCV Triple and must include the following general categories of instruction: ( 1 ) Orientation;
( 2 ) Basic operation;
( 3 ) Safe operating practices;
( 4 ) Advanced operations; and
( 5 ) Nondriving activities.
( b ) The LCV Driver-Training Program must include the minimum topics of training set forth in Appendix F to this part and behind-the-wheel instruction that is designed to provide an opportunity to develop the skills outlined under the Proficiency Development unit of the training program.
[69 FR 16732, Mar. 30, 2004, as amended at 83 FR 22874, May 17, 2018]
-----Original Message----- 

From: namzron9x@verizon.net [mailto:namzron9x@verizon.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:14 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Norm Wilkinson 

8315 Calif.Ave 

Whittier, CA 90605
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1484.html[7/23/2015 11:56:10 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-6io7

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1484

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Gary Hallenbeck

Address:

1 Tyler Road

Upton, MA, 01568

General Comment

Throughout my 35yearsin the work force I have been taxed in every way possible, on my income, my savings,

 my bonus, and my property. I would like to say I have paid every tax possible, but my representatives in

 Washington and the White House administration keep finding ways to invent new taxes. The list of taxes I have

 paid is still quite long, taxes on income, social security, Medicare, capital gains, interest, and AMT, just to name

 the largest.

Despite the heavy tax burden combined with low wage growth and rising living expenses I have been able to

 save some money in a 401K which my same representatives in government have told me would be mine in

 retirement. I strongly oppose any change to the one income stream I can control once I do retire. It is time for

 everyone in Washington to realize the spending and redistribution of weath problem our reppresentatives have

 created and fix that problem before finding new ways to penalize those, like me, that have already paid more

 than their fair share.

I
-----Original Message----- 

From: imwarped@earthlink.net [mailto:imwarped@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:26 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Nancy Rovin 

1316 Medford Rd. 

Wynnewood, PA 19096
From: Mike Hirvela <mike.hirvela@bayer.com> 

Date: September 8, 2014 at 10:20:15 AM EDT 

To: David Crank <david.crank@bayer.com> 

Subject: OHP Information on Aliette needed

Dave,

There is a request from the EPA to reduce the amount of Fosetyl Al that is allowed on the label of all 

registered products. We have a proposal to the EPA that we are preparing and need to ask OHP if any of 

the language or amounts would be detrimental to their business. I just got wind of this on Friday at 4:30. I 

apologize for the quick turnaround, however, I need to have our regulatory team an answer by 

Wednesday this week. Please see the questions below

1. How much Fosetyl is sprayed per acre by their customers? High rate is 5# per 100 

gallons. Typically 100 gallons will cover an acre of ornamentals unless they are treating plants 

with heavy foliage

2. How many applications and at what rate would be the worst case scenario that is applied (under the 

highest conceivable disease pressure)? Worst case would be 5# per 100 gallons. Repeat at 30 days

3. What is the typical interval between applications? At high rate of 5# per 100 interval is 30 days, 2.5# 

interval is 30 days, at 1.25 especially on bedding plants it is 14 days due to rapid plant 

growth(note usually not a repeat Aliette app but an alternative product)

4. What crops and locations is Fosetyl mostly used? Bedding and Flowering crops including tropical 

foliage. Some perennial plants outside due to pressure( Phytophthora, Pythium)

Also important part of Downy Mildew control programs such as for impatiens.

5. If Fosetyl registration was pulled what impact (chemicaly) would it have on their business? It would 

require growers to switch to alternative root disease/downy mildew products such as Subdue, 

Terrazole, Segway or begin utilizing a Phos Acid product 

6. Current proposal is for 144lbs AI/A/Yr, would this fit their model? Do not see a problem

7. Aerial applications are looking to be removed, would this affect any of OHP’s applications? Impact 

would be minor

8. Do they sell into other parallel markets? (Christmas tree farms, foresty, large conifer applications, aerial 

or otherwise) Minor usage. For most part would be tree nurseries not field operations
#### § 32.620 Cooperative agreement.

*Cooperative agreement* means an award of financial assistance that, consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6305, is used to enter into the same kind of relationship as a grant (see definition of grant in § 32.650), except that substantial involvement is expected between the Federal agency and the recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated by the award. The term does not include cooperative research and development agreements as defined in 15 U.S.C. 3710a.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1270.html[7/22/2015 9:32:54 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-2aj2

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1270

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

In a country that is based on liberty and limited government, the government bureaucracy has no business

 dictating how I use or manage my retirement. This is just an ongoing affront to liberty. Lets stay a nation that

 respects liberty and not a nanny state mentality.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0843.html[7/21/2015 4:07:56 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-38av

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0843

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Why keep regulating those who work hard for their money? Leave it alone and regulate your out of control

 spending habits. I have to run my household on a budget to get by. Why don't you?
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alfacell Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kuslima Shogen,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                   /s/ Kuslima Shogen
                                   -----------------------
                                   Name:  Kuslima Shogen
                                   Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                   Chairman of the Board
                                   Date: December 16, 2002
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0926.html[7/21/2015 6:24:49 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-roym

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0926

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Nick Stein

General Comment

i am fully capable of planning for my own retirement and do not need any government help. i do not want the

 government anywhere near my financial retirement accounts and certainly not directing how and where i can

 spend money that ive earned.
1210-AB32-2-1063.html[7/23/2015 3:42:38 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-jxm4

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1555

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Daniel Cameron

General Comment

Dear Committee,

Thank you for your concern, but I can plan for my own retirement, thank you. I don't need your help nor

 regulations. Please leave the retired alone to decide their own dispensing of their funds. The EBSA does not

 need to interfere any further.

Thank you.
# OSS-is ELECTRONIC RECORD

CCA # 09-13-00104-CR 

### OFFENSE: Official Oppression STYLE: Daniel Diaz v. The State ofTexas 

### PUNISHMENT: 1 yearcountyjail COUNTY: Liberty TRIAL COURT: 253rd District Court TRIAL COURTS: CR29411 

### TRIALCOURT JUDGE: JudgeChap B. CainIII DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED 

## Appellant's MOTION FOR REHEARING IS: OVERRULED DATE: 12-10-14 JUDGE: PER CURIAM

DATE: 12-10-14 JUSTICE: LeanneJohnson PC NO S YES PUBLISH: NO DNP: YES CLK RECORD: 04-11-13 SUPP CLK RECORD: RPT RECORD: 05-29-13 STATE BR: 01-21-14 SUPP RPT RECORD: 09-27-13 SUPP BR: APP BR: 12-03-13 PRO SE BR: 

# 035-15 IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS ELECTRONIC RECORD 

### CCA# PD-0035-15 

# A??ELIAN^Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

### Disposition: DATE: JUDGE: 

# DATE: Odlltf/z-O/jr JUDGE: fHA U^VUi^- SIGNED: PC: PUBLISH: DNP:
MOTION FOR REHEARING IN MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS: CCA IS: ON JUDGE: ON JUDGE:
§ 360.5T Updating user fees. ( a ) *Update.* Each fee established in this part may be updated in accordance with this section as deemed necessary by the FMCSA.
( b ) *Publication and effective dates.* Updated fees shall be published in the Federal Register and shall become effective 30 days after publication.
( c ) *Payment of fees.* Any person submitting a filing for which a fee is established shall pay the fee in effect at the time of the filing.
( d ) *Method of updating fees.* Each fee shall be updated by updating the cost components comprising the fee. Cost components shall be updated as follows: ( 1 ) Direct labor costs shall be updated by multiplying base level direct labor costs by percentage changes in average wages and salaries of FMCSA employees. Base level direct labor costs are direct labor costs determined by the cost study in Regulations Governing Fees For Service, 1 I.C.C. 2d 60 (1984), or subsequent cost studies. The base period for measuring changes shall be April 1984 or the year of the last cost study.
( 2 ) Operations overhead shall be developed each year on the basis of current relationships existing on a weighted basis, for indirect labor applicable to the first supervisory work centers directly associated with user fee activity. Actual updating of operations overhead will be accomplished by applying the current percentage factor to updated direct labor, including current governmental overhead costs.
( 3 ) ( i ) Office general and administrative costs shall be developed each year on the basis of current levels costs, *i.e.,* dividing actual office general and administrative costs for the current fiscal year by total office costs for the office directly associated with user fee activity. Actual updating of office general and administrative costs will be accomplished by applying the current percentage factor to updated direct labor, including current governmental overhead and current operations overhead costs.
( ii ) FMCSA general and administrative costs shall be developed each year on the basis of current level costs; *i.e.,* dividing actual FMCSA general and administrative costs for the current fiscal year by total agency expenses for the current fiscal year. Actual updating of FMCSA general and administrative costs will be accomplished by applying the current percentage factor to updated direct labor, including current governmental overhead, operations overhead and office general and administrative costs.
( 4 ) Publication costs shall be adjusted on the basis of known changes in the costs applicable to publication of material in the Federal Register or *FMCSA Register.* (This rounding procedures excludes copying, printing and search fees.)
( e ) *Rounding of updated fees.* Updated fees shall be rounded in the following manner: ( 1 ) Fees between $1 and $30 will be rounded to the nearest $1;
( 2 ) Fees between $30 and $100 will be rounded to the nearest $10;
( 3 ) Fees between $100 and $999 will be rounded to the nearest $50; and
( 4 ) Fees above $1,000 will be rounded to the nearest $100.
[82 FR 5298, Jan. 17, 2017]
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL H. WESTCOTT, Jr.,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

THE INTERIOR, National Park Service,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 06-35451

D.C. Nos. CV-03-00009-J-JWS

CV-03-00010-JWS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Alaska

John W. Sedwick, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 28, 2010

Anchorage, Alaska

Before: SCHROEDER, O’SCANNLAIN and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Daniel Westcott appeals the district court’s entry of

summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee National Park Service (“NPS”)

in Westcott’s action under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) challenging

the NPS’s distribution of funds as part of the Glacier Bay Commercial Fishing

FILED

AUG 17 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Compensation Program. See Pub. L. No. 106-31, § 501(b), 113 Stat. 57, 72-73

(1999) (codified at 16 U.S.C. § 410hh-4 note). Westcott contends that he should

have received over $256,000 based on the original estimates in the compensation

plan of the amount of funding to be allocated to Dungeness crab crew members, as

determined by an estimate of the number of claims that would be submitted in this

category. The $15,000 he received represented his proportional share of the total

amount of funds allocated to his category after all claims had been submitted. It in

fact roughly equaled the total amount he had earned in the three seasons he worked

on his parents’ Dungeness crab fishing boat.

The district court found that the NPS’s reallocation of funds did not require

the State of Alaska’s additional concurrence. This factual finding is supported by

the record and is not clearly erroneous. The record indeed reflects the State did not

object to that allocation.

The NPS did not violate the APA when it reallocated funds within the

compensation plan without first providing notice and an opportunity for public

comment. There was no substantive rulemaking requiring such procedures. The

allocation of funds was an interpretive rule. See 5 U.S.C. § 553(b)(3)(A); RenoSparks Indian Colony v. EPA, 336 F.3d 899, 909 (9th Cir. 2003).

AFFIRMED.
§ 512.15 How will confidentiality determinations be made? Information may be afforded confidential treatment if the Chief Counsel determines that: ( a ) The information is a trade secret;
( b ) Public disclosure of the information would be likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of the submitter;
( c ) Public disclosure of the information would be likely to impair NHTSA's ability to obtain necessary information in the future;
( d ) The information was provided to NHTSA voluntarily and was not customarily released to the public by the person from whom it was obtained; or
( e ) The information is otherwise entitled to protection, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(b).
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0889.html[7/21/2015 5:13:28 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-yxlv

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0889

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Karen Anonymous

General Comment

I am smart enough to handle my retirement money without any assistance from the government. You guys need

 to stay out of my wallet. You have done enough damage.
1210-AB32-2-1147.html[7/24/2015 6:36:46 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-qdz3

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1641

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Scott Kleiber

Address:

175 W. Wooster

Bowling Green, OH, 43402

General Comment

Regulations at all levels of government have gotten out of control. Give individuals the right to oversee their own

 retirement and use those funds as they see fit. This is not a case for more governmental this a property rights

 issue. Hands off our money!