alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 9, 2000 Session CITY OF CHATTANOOGA v. KEVIN DAVIS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 225103 Douglas A. Meyer, Judge FILED OCTOBER 31, 2000 No. E2000-00664-COA-R3-CV

H OUSTON M. G ODDARD , P.J., Concurring

I concur in the opinion o f Judge Susan o because I believe he has accurately articulated the present state of Tennessee law on the subject at hand. I also concur

in the dissenting opinion of Judge Franks, which

urges the Supre

me Court to accep

t this case if

an application fo

r permission to appeal is requested so that a definitive and authoritative rule may be enunciated as to this significant constitutional question.

_________________________________________ HOUSTON M. GODDARD, PRESIDING JUDGE
EXHIBIT 21

                              AMBASE CORPORATION
                              SUBSIDIARY LISTING
                           AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2006

                                  Jurisdiction              Percentage Voting
                                   In Which                 Securities Owned By
Name                               Organized                  Immediate Parent
============================================== ================================
============================================== ================================

AmBase Corporation                  Delaware                        N/A

   Carteret Bancorp, Inc.           Delaware                       100%

   Home Capital Services, Inc.      Delaware                       100%

   Maiden Lane Associates, Ltd.     Delaware                       100%

  SDG Financial Corp.               Delaware                       100%


     Note:  Interrelationships  shown by indentation  with 100% ownership unless
otherwise indicated.
Coös,

Dec., 1900.

#### Jackson *v.*Higgins.

Assumpsit. Trial by jury and verdict for the plaintiff. In January, 1900, the plaintiff was employed by the defendant to sell his farm. The contract was not in writing. The defendant moved for a nonsuit (1) on the ground of insufficient evidence, and (2) because of the statute of frauds. His motion was overruled and he excepted.

The defendant wrote a letter to the plaintiff in January, 1900, in which he offered to pay the plaintiff if he would find a purchaser for his farm before it was time to begin spring work. This letter was admitted in evidence, and the defendant excepted.

*Chamberlin & Rich,*for the plaintiff.

*Albert S.*Twitched, for the defendant.

Young, J.

The first exception raises no question of law. Whether there is any evidence, is a question of law; but whether it is sufficient, is a question of fact.

The statute of frauds does not apply to contracts of hiring which may be performed within one year.

The letter was clearly admissible.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Paksons, J„ did not sit: the others concurred.
#### § 29.517 Can a Tribe use Federal supply sources in the performance of a compact and funding agreement?

A Tribe and its employees may use Federal supply sources (including lodging, airline, interagency motor pool vehicles, and other means of transportation) in the performance of a compact and funding agreement to the same extent as if the Tribe were a Federal agency. The Department will assist the Tribes, to the extent feasible, to resolve any barriers to full implementation.
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SEVENTH DISTRICT, AT AMARILLO

No. 07-14-00312-CV

Tom Norman

v.

Ann Crouch and Omni Capital Corporation d/b/a South Georgia Shopping Center

(No. 63550-A IN 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

Reporter's record

Indigent

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Filing

Statewide efiling fee $2,892.00

$25.00

$50.00

$100.00

$20.00 UNKNOWN

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT 47th District Court

Tom Norman

Tom Norman

Tom Norman

Tom Norman

Balance of costs owing to the Seventh Court of Appeals, Amarillo, Texas: $0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per

the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, VIVIAN LONG, CLERK OF THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of

the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears

of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the

Seventh District of Texas on September 24, 2015

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.713T Reapplying for new entrant registration. ( a ) A non-North America-domiciled motor carrier whose provisional new entrant registration has been revoked may reapply for new entrant registration no sooner than 30 days after the date of revocation.
( b ) If the provisional new entrant registration was revoked because the new entrant failed to receive a Satisfactory rating after undergoing a compliance review, the new entrant must do all of the following: ( 1 ) Submit an updated MCS-150.
( 2 ) Submit evidence that it has corrected the deficiencies that resulted in revocation of its registration and will otherwise ensure that it will have basic safety management controls in effect.
( 3 ) Successfully complete a pre-authorization safety audit in accordance with § 385.607T(c).
( 4 ) Begin the 18-month new entrant monitoring cycle again as of the date the re-filed application is approved.
( c ) If the provisional new entrant registration was revoked because FMCSA found that the new entrant had failed to submit to a compliance review, it must do all of the following: ( 1 ) Submit an updated MCS-150.
( 2 ) Successfully complete a pre-authorization safety audit in accordance with § 385.607T(c).
( 3 ) Begin the 18-month new entrant monitoring cycle again as of the date the re-filed application is approved.
( 4 ) Submit to a compliance review upon request.
( d ) If the new entrant is a for-hire carrier subject to the registration provisions under 49 U.S.C. 13901 and also has had its operating authority revoked, it must re-apply for operating authority as set forth in part 365 of this subchapter.
[82 FR 5306, Jan. 17, 2017]
§ 31.16 Disqualification of reviewing official or ALJ. ( a ) A reviewing official or ALJ in a particular case may disqualify himself or herself at any time.
( b ) A party may file a motion for disqualification of a reviewing official or an ALJ. Such motion shall be accompanied by an affidavit alleging personal bias or other reason for disqualification.
( c ) Such motion and affidavit shall be filed promptly upon the party's discovery of reasons requiring disqualification, or such objections shall be deemed waived.
( d ) Such affidavit shall state specific facts that support the party's belief that personal bias or other reason for disqualification exists and the time and circumstances of the party's discovery of such facts. It shall be accompanied by a certificate of the representative of record that it is made in good faith.
( e ) ( 1 ) If the ALJ determines that a reviewing official is disqualified, the ALJ shall dismiss the complaint without prejudice.
( 2 ) If the ALJ disqualifies himself or herself, the case shall be reassigned promptly to another ALJ.
( 3 ) If the ALJ denies a motion to disqualify, the authority head may determine the matter only as part of his or her review of the initial decision upon appeal, if any.
#### Herman Gottlieb, Appellant, *v.*Simon J. Altschuler et al., Respondents.

Reported below, 143 App. Div. 935.

(Submitted April 24, 1911;

decided May 2, 1911.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 31, 1911, which affirmed an order of Special Term directing the plaintiff to execute to the defendant Altschuler a release from liability under a judgment heretofore rendered.

The motion was made upon the ground that the order appealed from was not appealable of right to the Court of Appeals.

*Abraham rosenstein*for motion.

*Herman Gottlieb*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
|   | **Exhibit 32.1** |
|--------|------------------|

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of AmBase Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard A. Bianco, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date:  March 29, 2010 | /s/ Richard A. Bianco |
|-----------------------|-----------------------|

|   | Richard A. Bianco |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|

|   | AmBase Corporation |
|--------|--------------------|
#### § 237.107 Conduct of bridge inspections.

Bridge inspections shall be conducted under the direct supervision of a designated railroad bridge inspector, who shall be responsible for the accuracy of the results and the conformity of the inspection to the bridge management program.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2415

AN ACT

To designate the United States Customs AdminisCustoms Administrative Building’’. Paso, Texas, as the ‘‘Timothy C. McCaghren Entry located at 797 South Zaragosa Road in El trative Building at the Ysleta/Zaragosa Port of
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2415

AN ACT

To designate the United States Customs Administrative

Building at the Ysleta/Zaragosa Port of Entry located

at 797 South Zaragosa Road in El Paso, Texas, as

the ‘‘Timothy C. McCaghren Customs Administrative

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2415 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States Customs Administrative Building

3 at the Ysleta/Zaragosa Port of Entry located at 797 South

4 Zaragosa Road in El Paso, Texas, shall be known and des5 ignated as the ‘‘Timothy C. McCaghren Customs Adminis6 trative Building’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

10 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

11 to the ‘‘Timothy C. McCaghren Customs Administrative

12 Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 18

(legislative day, December 15), 1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-57640 and 333-84446), on
Form S-4 (File No. 333-37082) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-61390 and 333-49780) of Exelon Corporation and Subsidiary Companies of our report dated January 29,
2003, except for Note 23 for which the date is February 20, 2003, relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 29, 2003 relating to the financial statement schedule, which
appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP

Chicago,
Illinois
March 21, 2003

---

QuickLinks
1210-AB32-2-1439.html[7/26/2015 5:04:36 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwd-8dod

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1935

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: richard wabbersen

General Comment

stay away from my retirement plan
###### Editorial Note on Part 393

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 393.82 Speedometer.

Each bus, truck, and truck-tractor must be equipped with a speedometer indicating vehicle speed in miles per hour and/or kilometers per hour. The speedometer must be accurate to within plus or minus 8 km/hr (5 mph) at a speed of 80 km/hr (50 mph).

[70 FR 48054, Aug. 15, 2005]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1491.html[7/23/2015 11:56:09 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-8roy

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1491

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I keep hearing that new rules are being considered to control retirement income and this is intrusive and

 unnecessary. I am capable of handling my own retirement income. I have been doing so for 40 years. I do NOT

 need the government telling me how to do this or controlling what happens to what I have put aside for that

 purpose. 

This is an area of our lives that is personal and should not be impacted by the government!
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7309

ANTONIO M. WALLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CATHERINE PAGE, Psychiatrist, Red Onion State Prison; P. RASNICK, Nurse; LIEUTENANT YOUNCE; SERGEANT FLANARY; SERGEANT FOWLER; THOMPSON, Prison Guard, Defendants - Appellees, and FRED SCHILLING, Director of Health Services; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES; JOHN DOE, Defendants.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-762-7) Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 17, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Antonio M. Waller, Appellant Pro Se. David Ernest Boelzner, Heather Marie Kofron, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia; Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Antonio M. Waller appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to some of the Defendants in his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1437.html[7/23/2015 11:00:37 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-5rcg

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1437

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Dennis Rhodes

General Comment

The government does not need to involve itself in my 401K and what I plan to do with it. It is money that I saved

 and I am the only one that should have a say in how it is used. Please try to keep yourself busy finding ways to

 slow government spending and not mine.
H. Res. 296

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 28, 2001.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 3338) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30,

2002, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill

shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. The amendment printed in the report of the Committee

on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as

adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole.

Points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, for

failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived except
2

•HRES 296 EH

as follows: ‘‘to be derived from the Airport and Airway Trust

Fund and’’ on page 183, lines 24 and 25; ‘‘to be derived

from the Airport and Airway Trust Fund and’’ on page 184,

lines 7 and 8; ‘‘to be derived from the Highway Trust Fund

and’’ on page 184, lines 18 and 19. Where points of order

are waived against part of a paragraph, points of order

against a provision in another part of such paragraph may

be made only against such provision and not against the entire paragraph. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the

portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall

be considered as read. During consideration of the bill, points

of order against amendments for failure to comply with

clause 2(e) of rule XXI are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise

and report the bill, as amended, to the House with such

amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amend-
3

•HRES 296 EH

ments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 32.655 Individual.

*Individual* means a natural person.
§ 375.207 What items must be in my advertisements? ( a ) You and your agents must publish and use only truthful, straightforward, and honest advertisements.
( b ) You must include, and you must require each of your agents to include, in all advertisements for all services (including any accessorial services incidental to or part of interstate household goods transportation), the following two elements: ( 1 ) Your name or trade name, as it appears on our document assigning you a U.S. DOT number, or the name or trade name of the motor carrier under whose operating authority the advertised service will originate.
( 2 ) Your U.S. DOT number, assigned by us authorizing you to operate as a for-hire motor carrier transporting household goods.
( c ) Your FMCSA-assigned U.S. DOT number must be displayed only in the following form in every advertisement: U.S. DOT No. (*assigned number*).
§ 262.17 Combining grant awards. Two or more States, but not political subdivisions of States, may, pursuant to an agreement entered into by the States, combine any part of the amounts provided through grants for a project under this section provided: ( 1 ) The project will benefit each of the States entering into the agreement; and
( 2 ) The agreement is not a violation of the law of any such State.
IV

House Calendar No. 25

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 141

[Report No. 107–67]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 622) to amend the Internal

Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the adoption credit, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 15, 2001

Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 622) to amend

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the adoption credit, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 622) to

4 amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the

5 adoption credit, and for other purposes. The bill shall be

6 considered as read for amendment. The amendment rec7 ommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now
2

HRES 141 RH

1 printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The pre2 vious question shall be considered as ordered on the bill,

3 as amended, to final passage without intervening motion

4 except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended,

5 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank6 ing minority member of the Committee on Ways and

7 Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without

8 instructions.
House Calendar No. 25

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 141

[Report No. 107–67]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 622)

to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 toexpand the adoption credit, and for other purposes.

MAY 15, 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0719.html[7/21/2015 10:26:35 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-rwki

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0719

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jerry Payseno

Address: United States, 

General Comment

I'm smart enough to run my 401 k and live by my own budget why don't you the government try to do the same

 or are you government workers smat enough us working people are tied of paying for you not so smart

 government workers!!!!