alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                                            <C>            
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         25,487
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               919
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    18,293
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         76,740
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           77,567
<LOANS>                                        360,363
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (4,992)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 502,919
<DEPOSITS>                                     438,849
<SHORT-TERM>                                   26,245
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            2,499
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       15,303
<OTHER-SE>                                     16,239
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 502,919
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                22,798
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              4,424
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               279
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               27,501
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             10,961
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             11,718
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          15,783
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  950
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                12,817
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,280
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     4,455
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,455
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.69
<LOANS-NON>                                    974
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               4,729
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  (763)
<RECOVERIES>                                   76
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              4,992
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
        


</TABLE>
§ 31.46 Compromise or settlement. ( a ) Parties may make offers of compromise or settlement at any time.
( b ) The reviewing official has the exclusive authority to compromise or settle a case under this part at any time after the date on which the reviewing official is permitted to issue a complaint and before the date on which the ALJ issues an initial decision.
( c ) The authority head has exclusive authority to compromise or settle a case under this part at any time after the date on which the ALJ issues an initial decision, except during the pendency of any review under § 31.42 or during the pendency of any action to collect penalties and assessments under § 31.43.
( d ) The Attorney General has exclusive authority to compromise or settle a case under this part during the pendency of any review under § 31.42 or of any action to recover penalties and assessments under 31 U.S.C. 3806.
( e ) The investigating official may recommend settlement terms to the reviewing official, the authority head, or the Attorney General, as appropriate. The reviewing official may recommend settlement terms to the authority head, or the Attorney General, as appropriate.
( f ) Any compromise or settlement must be in writing.
Breadcrumb              -  Home 
              -  About HRSA 
              -  Organization 
              - 									Immediate Office of the Administrator							

# Immediate Office of the Administrator

**Administrator**Carole Johnson

**Principal Deputy Administrator**Diana Espinosa

**Deputy Administrator**Jordan Grossman

**Chief of Staff**Garrett Devenney

**Senior Advisor**Nisha Patel

Contact Phone: 301-443-2216

## Key staff directory

                                  - Office of the Administrator
                                  - Bureau of Health Workforce
                                  - Bureau of Primary Health Care
                                  - Federal Office of Rural Health Policy
                                  - Health Systems Bureau
                                  - HIV/AIDS Bureau
                                  - Maternal & Child Health Bureau
                                  - Provider Relief Bureau
                                  - Office for the Advancement of Telehealth
                                  - Office of Civil Rights, Diversity, and Inclusion

                                  - Office of Communications
                                  - Office of Federal Assistance and Acquisition Management
                                  - Office of Health Equity
                                  - Office of Intergovernmental and External Affairs
                                  - Office of Legislation
                                  - Office of Operations
                                  - Office of Planning, Analysis and Evaluation
                                  - Office of Special Health Initiatives
                                  - Office of Women's Health
                                  - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Staff

May 2023
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00233-CV

Super Starr International, LLC, Lance Peterson, Red Starr, SPR de R.L. de C.V., and 

Kemal Mert Gumus

v.

Fresh Texas Produce, LLC, Individually and derivatively on behalf of Tex Starr 

Distributing, LLC

On Appeal from the

92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-4741-16-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellants, Super Starr International, LLC, Lance Peterson, Red Starr, SPR de 

R.L. de C.V., and Kemal Mert Gumus. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 18, 2019
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, J.J. Finkelstein, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1
to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



Date: January 16, 2013



|                                                                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                            
|/s/    J.J. Finkelstein                                                                                                                     
|J.J. Finkelstein
        President and Chief Executive Officer
        (principal executive officer
        and principal financial officer)
§ 375.301 What service options may I provide? ( a ) You may design your household goods service to provide individual shippers with a wide range of specialized service and pricing features. Many carriers provide at least the following five service options: ( 1 ) Space reservation.
( 2 ) Expedited service.
( 3 ) Exclusive use of a vehicle.
( 4 ) Guaranteed service on or between agreed dates.
( 5 ) Liability insurance.
( b ) If you sell liability insurance, you must follow the requirements in § 375.303.
Exhibit 99.1

Certification of Periodic Report

I, Joseph A. Sasenick, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Alcide Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Company for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (12 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and

(2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:
January 13, 2003

| |  | By | /s/JOSEPH A. SASENICKJoseph A. Sasenick Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer,
Alcide Corporation
| |  | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

20

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 130 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 19
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 130

                          [Report No. 107-54]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 2, 2001

     Mr. Goss, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
 resolution which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of May 3, 2001, providing 
for consideration or disposition of a conference report to accompany 
the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 83) establishing the 
congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 
2002, revising the congressional budget for the United States 
Government for fiscal year 2001, and setting forth appropriate 
budgetary levels for each of fiscal years 2003 through 2011.

                                                  House Calendar No. 19

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 130

                          [Report No. 107-54]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 2, 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
1210-AB32-2-1411.html[7/26/2015 4:47:50 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jw4-j85f

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1907

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Eric O.

General Comment

Dear Sir or Madam,

I oppose any governmental intervention regarding any IRA or 401K in my name ( on anyone else's name for that

 matter).

I do not require your "assistance" in determining what is best for me.

Please keep your ideas, laws, programs, and regulations far away from my retirement funds and accounts.

Respectfully,

Eric O.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0943.html[7/21/2015 6:42:20 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-ny6w

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0943

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Sheri Glaros

Address:

South Pasadena, CA, 91030

General Comment

I do not need the government deciding on my retirement. We are grown people and have already begun saving

 for that time, however, you could work with the part of the government that has a debt of 18 trillion (PLUS). Do

 you think I trust to government to provide for me when they can't even balance a budget? I have to do without so

 I can pay my bills, so should the govt. I want independence not dependency. Have you forgotten how our

 country began the great experiment? Have you forgotten WHO enabled us to be here? 

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator

 with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure

 these rights,"

Let me chart my own way in life, stop taxing me to death and no...the little money I have after taxes are mine,

 not yours.

Sincerely,

Sheri Glaros
1210-AB32-2-1286.html[7/24/2015 10:21:18 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvu-qbdd

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1781

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I do not want the government involved in my retirement funds! You haven't been able to manage the affairs of

 the government sucessfully. Leave my retirement alone! Stop trying to control every aspect of Ameerican lives!

 Do what you were elected to do! Represent your constituents for their best interest NOT yours! I am so

 disgusted with the lot of you and do not trust you to do what is right. Stay out of our private lives!!
#### § 299.605 Functional and performance qualification tests.

The railroad shall conduct functional and performance qualification tests, prior to commencing revenue operations, to verify that all safety-critical components meet all functional and all performance specifications.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 126 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 126

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Sugar Ray 
    Robinson should be recognized for his athletic achievements and 
                      commitment to young people.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2001

 Mr. Rangel submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Sugar Ray 
    Robinson should be recognized for his athletic achievements and 
                      commitment to young people.

Whereas Sugar Ray Robinson was born in Detroit, Michigan, on May 3, 1920;
Whereas in 1932 he moved to New York City where he started boxing as an amateur, 
        going undefeated in 89 bouts, and winning the Golden Gloves 
        featherweight title in 1939;
Whereas in 1940 he began boxing professionally and fought at New York City's 
        Madison Square Garden for the first time;
Whereas in 1946 he won his first world title as a welterweight, and then held 
        the middleweight title for 5 years between 1951 and 1960;
Whereas after retiring for a time he returned to box a series of exciting 
        matches before permanently retiring on December 10, 1965;
Whereas in a career spanning 25 years, he won 175 of 202 bouts with 109 
        knockouts;
Whereas his grace, speed, power, and mastery of the ring earned him 
        international acclaim as one of the greatest fighters in boxing history;
Whereas Sugar Ray Robinson was elected into the Boxing Hall of Fame in 1967;
Whereas in 1969 he established the Sugar Ray Robinson Youth Foundation; and
Whereas Sugar Ray Robinson died in Culver City, California, on April 12, 1989, 
        at the age of 68: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
Sugar Ray Robinson should be recognized as one of history's greatest 
professional boxers, whose dedication to boxing and commitment to young 
people have earned him a permanent place in sports history.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 385

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 385.917 Other orders unaffected; not exclusive remedy.

If a motor carrier subject to an order issued under this subpart is or becomes subject to any other order, prohibition, or requirement of the FMCSA, an order issued under this subpart is in addition to, and does not amend or supersede the other order, prohibition, or requirement. Nothing in this subpart precludes FMCSA from taking action against any motor carrier under 49 U.S.C. 13905 or 49 U.S.C. 31134 for other conduct amounting to willful failure to comply with an applicable statute, regulation or FMCSA order.
§ 37.203 Lift maintenance. ( a ) The entity shall establish a system of regular and frequent maintenance checks of lifts sufficient to determine if they are operative.
( b ) The entity shall ensure that vehicle operators report to the entity, by the most immediate means available, any failure of a lift to operate in service.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, when a lift is discovered to be inoperative, the entity shall take the vehicle out of service before the beginning of the vehicle's next trip and ensure that the lift is repaired before the vehicle returns to service.
( d ) If there is no other vehicle available to take the place of an OTRB with an inoperable lift, such that taking the vehicle out of service before its next trip will reduce the transportation service the entity is able to provide, the entity may keep the vehicle in service with an inoperable lift for no more than five days from the day on which the lift is discovered to be inoperative.
Exhibit
10.6

June 15, 2005

Graham Capital
Management, L.P.
 Rock Ledge Financial Center
 40 Highland
Avenue
 Rowayton, CT 06853

Attention: Mr. Paul
Sedlack

Re:    Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mr. Sedlack:

We are writing with respect
to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which
reference is made below (the "Management
Agreements"). We are extending the term of the Management
Agreements through June 30, 2006 and all other provisions of the
Management Agreements will remain
unchanged.

		
	• 	Smith Barney Global Markets
Futures Fund


		
	• 	Smith Barney Diversified
Futures Fund L.P. II


		
	• 	Smith Barney
Diversified Futures Fund L.P.


		
	• 	Salomon
Smith Barney Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.


		
	• 	AURORA
2001


		
	• 	AURORA
III


		
	• 	Salomon Smith Barney Fairfield
Futures Fund L.P.


		
	• 	Citigroup Diversified
Futures Fund L.P.


		
	• 	Citigroup Fairfield
Futures Fund L.P. II


		
	• 	Alera
100


		
	• 	Alera Portfolio Spc


Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing
one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel
McAuliffe at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-559-5043.

Very truly
yours,

CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC

		
	By: 	/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe,
Jr.                

 Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer and Director


		
	By: 	/s/ Paul Sedlack    


Print Name: Paul Sedlack    


DRMcA/sr
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 7, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23

- 1912

Lower Tribunal No. F20

- 11402

________________



### Keion Ware

, Petitioner,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction

– Prohibition

.

Keion Ware

, in proper person

.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General

, and Kayla Heather McNab, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before SCALES, LINDSEY, and MILLER , JJ.

PER CURIAM.2

Petitioner Keion Ware, pro se, seeks a writ of prohibition based on the

trial court’s denial of his motion to recuse the trial ju dge. Because Petitioner

is currently being represented by counsel

— and counsel has not adopted the

motion to recuse

— we dismiss. See , e.g.

, Sheppard v. State , 17 So. 3d 275,

282 (Fla. 2009) (“We reaffirm our holding in Logan [ 1 ] and Johnson [ 2 ] to

dismiss pro se extraordinary writ petitions filed in this Court while a defendant

is simultaneously being represented by counsel in ongoing criminal

proceedings in either the trial or appellate court.”).

1 Logan v. State , 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003).

2 Johnson v. State , 974 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 2008).
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0762.html[7/21/2015 11:43:14 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-yf9p

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0762

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Sue Leal

Address:

590 s falling star drive, anaheim, ca 92808

Anaheim, CA, 92808

Email: sue@specceramics.com

Phone: 714-231-4660

General Comment

The government should NOT have any right to my 401k or Social Security money. I have EARNED that money

 all my life. Keep out of it!