alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,243,000
<SECURITIES>                                 5,491,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,820,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   114,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,258,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,915,000
<PP&E>                                       5,095,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,230,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,780,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,655,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           10,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,115,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,125,000
<SALES>                                     10,110,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,110,000
<CGS>                                        4,823,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,169,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,052,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   780,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,272,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,272,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
1210-AB32-2-1384.html[7/26/2015 3:39:50 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jw1-ffxf

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1880

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Pat Anonymous

General Comment

I am sick and tired of the government thinking that I, an average American, am not smart enough to plan my

 retirement or spend my own money. Why would I want the government to take charge of my money? You can't

 even keep America out of debt, you overspend on everything and pretty much run rampant over society. I don't

 lie, I don't make promises I will not keep and I am transparent. Can't say as much for the government. Once you

 get rid of all the "fat cats" lining their pockets with taxpayers dollars, stop the corruption and become transparent

 by telling the truth, maybe I will be able to have a little respect for government. Right now you are all a disgrace

 to the offices you hold and you should be ashamed of yourselves. Don't forget that justice does prevail and

 eternity is a long, long time.
#### Joseph Esmond and another, *Appellants, v.*Moses L. Abbott, *Respondent.*

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, with ten dollars costs.
H. Res. 116

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 15, 2001.

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is

preserved and enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance

and dedication of law enforcement personnel;

Whereas more than 700,000 law enforcement officers, both

men and women, at great risk to their personal safety,

serve their fellow citizens as guardians of peace;

Whereas these peace officers are on the front line in preserving the right of the children of the United States to

receive an education in a crime-free environment, a right

that is all too often threatened by the insidious fear

caused by violence in schools;

Whereas 151 peace officers lost their lives in the line of duty

in 2000, and a total of nearly 15,000 men and women

serving as peace officers have made that supreme sacrifice;

Whereas every year, 1 in 9 peace officers is assaulted, 1 in

25 is injured, and 1 in 4,400 is killed in the line of duty;

and

Whereas on May 15, 2001, more than 15,000 peace officers

are expected to gather in the Nation’s Capital to join

with the families of their recently fallen comrades to
2

•HRES 116 EH

honor those comrades and all others who went before

them: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that—

(1) all peace officers slain in the line of duty should

be honored and recognized; and

(2) the President should issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to honor and

recognize such officers with appropriate ceremonies and

respect.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 266.3 Rail Service Assistance Program. ( a ) *Scope of the program.* The Rail Service Assistance Program includes: ( 1 ) Rail service continuation assistance;
( 2 ) Acquisition assistance;
( 3 ) Rehabilitation or improvement assistance;
( 4 ) Substitute service assistance;
( 5 ) Rail facility construction assistance;
( 6 ) Planning assistance; and
( 7 ) Program operations assistance.
( b ) *Special limitations on planning assistance and program operation assistance.* ( 1 ) A State is eligible to receive up to $100,000, or 5 percent of its entitlement, whichever is greater, as planning assistance; and
( 2 ) A State is eligible to receive up to 5 percent of the total amount of funds granted to it each fiscal year under paragraphs (a)(1) to (5) of this section as program operation assistance.
#### § 299.601 Responsibility for verification demonstrations and tests.

The railroad shall comply with the pre-revenue qualification tests and verification requirements set forth in this subpart to demonstrate the overall safety of the system, prior to revenue operations.
1

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Northern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1164

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Brandon Deverell, * Northern District of Iowa.

*

Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________

Submitted: May 21, 2008

Filed: June 16, 2008

___________

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After revoking Brandon Deverell’s supervised release, the district court1

sentenced him to 12 months in prison and 18 months of supervised release. Deverell

appeals, arguing that the additional supervised-release term renders his sentence

unreasonable because the prison term was adequate punishment for the violations, and

the record failed to indicate the additional supervised release would accomplish

anything.
-2-

We conclude that the district court’s addition of an 18-month term of supervised

release to Deverell’s 12-month prison term did not render his revocation sentence

unreasonable. The court, upon revoking Deverell’s supervised release, had the

authority to sentence him to a term of imprisonment followed by a term of supervised

release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), (h). Although the court noted Deverell’s previous

failures while on supervision, the court properly considered all applicable factors set

forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in deciding what revocation sentence to ultimately

impose. See United States v. Nelson, 453 F.3d 1004, 1006 (8th Cir. 2006) (appellate

court reviews revocation sentence to determine whether it is unreasonable in relation

to, inter alia, § 3553(a) factors and advisory Guidelines range). Finally, both the

prison term and the supervised-release term are within the applicable statutory

maximums. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3559(a)(3) (felony is Class C if maximum prison term

is less than 25 years but 10 or more years), 3583(b)(2) (for Class C felony, maximum

supervised release term is 3 years), 3583(e)(3) (for Class C felony, maximum prison

term upon revocation of supervised release is 2 years), 3583(h) (supervised release

component of revocation sentence “shall not exceed the term of supervised release

authorized by statute for the offense that resulted in the original term of supervised

release, less any term of imprisonment that was imposed upon revocation of

supervised release”).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, we the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively
of Communications Systems, Inc. (the Company) hereby certify:

(1) That the
accompanying Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                      |  |                                             | 
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- | 
|                      |  | /s/ Jeffrey
 K. Berg                       
|                      |  |                                             | 
|                      |  | Jeffrey K.
 Berg                           
|Date: March
 18, 2010 |  | President
 and Chief Executive Officer     
|                      |  |                                             | 
|                      |  | /s/ David T.
 McGraw                       
|                      |  |                                             | 
|                      |  | David T.
 McGraw                            | 
|Date: March
 18, 2010 |  | Vice
 President and Chief Financial Officer

58

---
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0898.html[7/21/2015 5:51:11 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-yny9

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0898

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: David DeFevers

General Comment

I prefer not to have the government deciding how I spend my retirement funds.
Editorial Note on Part 391
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 391 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 391.67 Farm vehicle drivers of articulated commercial motor vehicles. The following rules in this part do not apply to a farm vehicle driver (as defined in § 390.5 of this subchapter) who is 18 years of age or older and who drives an articulated commercial motor vehicle: ( a ) Section 391.11(b)(1) and (7) (relating to general qualifications of drivers);
( b ) Subpart C (relating to disclosure of, investigation into, and inquiries about the background, character, and driving record of drivers);
( c ) Subpart D (relating to road tests); and
( d ) Subpart F (relating to maintenance of files and records).
[63 FR 33278, June 18, 1998, as amended at 87 FR 13209, Mar. 9, 2022]
First Amendment to the Asset Purchase Agreement



 Exhibit 10.84 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT 
 This First Amendment to the Asset Purchase Agreement (this “Amendment”) is dated as of March 22, 2006, and made by and among
gateway.realty.new jersey.llc, a New Jersey limited liability company (the “Seller”), FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Parent”), and Local Fiber, LLC, a New York
limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (the “Purchaser”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, the parties hereto are parties to that certain Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2003 (the “Agreement”);
and 
 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to modify certain terms set forth in the Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. Definitions. Unless otherwise defined herein, all
capitalized terms used in this Amendment will have the meanings given to such terms in the Agreement. 
 2. Amendments to
Article 1. Section 3.3 of the Agreement is hereby amended by replacing “twenty-four-month period” with “forty-eight-month period” in Section 3.3(a). 
 3. Effective Date. The terms of this Amendment are hereby expressly deemed effective as of the second anniversary of the Closing Date. 

4. No Other Amendments. Except as expressly amended, modified and supplemented hereby, the provisions of the Agreement are and will remain in
full force and effect and, except as expressly provided herein, nothing in this Amendment will be construed as a waiver of any of the rights or obligations of the parties under the Agreement. 
 5. Integration. This Amendment contains all agreements of the Parties with respect to the subject matter delineated herein. No prior agreement or
understanding pertaining to such subject matter will be effective. 
 6. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to its principles of conflicts of laws. 
 7.
Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of identical counterparts, each of which will constitute an original but all of which when taken together will constitute but one instrument. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have each caused this Amendment to be duly executed by their
respective officers thereunto duly authorized as of the date first above set forth. 
  

			
	FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc.
		
	 By: 
	 	  
		
	 Name: 
	 	
		
	 Title: 
	 	
	
	Local Fiber, LLC
		
	 By: 
	 	  
		
	 Name: 
	 	
		
	 Title: 
	 	
	
	gateway.realty.new jersey.llc,
		
	 By: 
	 	  
		
	 Name: 
	 	
		
	 Title: 
	 	

  

 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 384

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 384 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 384.303 [Reserved]
Exhibit 24.1



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Edward A. Brennan do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name
and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2006 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform
all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



/s/ Edward A. BrennanEdward A. Brennan




DATE: February 5, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>   1000
       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         2626
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               4125
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    4648
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       12,446
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         12,463
<LOANS>                                      36,656
<ALLOWANCE>                                     481
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               62,453
<DEPOSITS>                                   51,112
<SHORT-TERM>                                   1802
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             832
<LONG-TERM>                                    2870
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                    3588
<COMMON>                                       1067
<OTHER-SE>                                     1182
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               62,453
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                1793
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               506
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                101
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               2400
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              851
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              988
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1412
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 436
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      436
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    288
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  4.8
<LOANS-NON>                                       0
<LOANS-PAST>                                      0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                506
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    33
<RECOVERIES>                                      8
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               481
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            481
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           0
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 393
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 393.78 Windshield wiping and washing systems. ( a ) *Vehicles manufactured on or after December 25, 1968.* Each bus, truck, and truck-tractor manufactured on or after December 25, 1968, must have a windshield wiping system that meets the requirements of FMVSS No. 104 (S4.1) in effect on the date of manufacture. Each of these vehicles must have a windshield washing system that meets the requirements of FMVSS No. 104 (S4.2.2) in effect on the date of manufacture.
( b ) *Vehicles manufactured between June 30, 1953, and December 24, 1968.* Each truck, truck-tractor, and bus manufactured between June 30, 1953, and December 24, 1968, shall be equipped with a power-driven windshield wiping system with at least two wiper blades, one on each side of the centerline of the windshield. Motor vehicles which depend upon vacuum to operate the windshield wipers, shall have the wiper system constructed and maintained such that the performance of the wipers will not be adversely affected by a change in the intake manifold pressure.
( c ) *Driveaway-towaway operations.* Windshield wiping and washing systems need not be in working condition while a commercial motor vehicle is being towed in a driveaway-towaway operation.
[70 FR 48054, Aug. 15, 2005]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0814.html[7/21/2015 2:55:07 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-bsvu

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0814

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: James Harvey

General Comment

I want to decide what to do with my own money! Vote no for this law!!!
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 7, 1995 (111), Para 111.31 Appointment of Conferees--H.R. 1905]
[Page 1317]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.111.31  appointment of conferees--H.R. 1905

  Thereupon, the SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaHOOD, by unanimous consent, 
announced the appointment of Messrs. Myers, Rogers, Knollenberg, Riggs, 
Frelinghuysen, Bunn, Livingston, Bevill, Fazio, Chapman, and Obey, as 
managers on the part of the House at said conference.
  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate of the foregoing 
appointments.
```
#### Jacob Dilcher, Respondent, *v.*Michael Nellany, Appellant.

(Submitted November 14, 1910;

decided November 22, 1910.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 199 N. Y. 572.)
1210-AB32-2-1219.html[7/24/2015 8:30:03 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvs-4mcd

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1714

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Randi Brown

General Comment

I am a hard-working, single mom. I live with my parents because I am saving for retirement and my children's

 future. I have 401K's, a Roth IRA, a savings account and Coverdell savings for my children. I am also in the

 process of finally buying a home. I may need to use some of the Roth money as I have always intended to do so

 since the start, over 15 years ago! Thank you to all who have an idea that you may have a better idea for my

 money... but I'VE GOT THIS! I have been a responsible spender, a hard worker and I am confident that I am

 making my decisions the best way I can for my and my children's future. You get PLENTY of our money via

 taxes, both income and sales. LEAVE MY RETIREMENT ALONE!!!
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1172.html[7/22/2015 3:04:58 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-mvhn

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1172

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Roger Gelik

Address:

Pittsburgh, PA,

General Comment

I have every right & responsibility to plan for and care for my own retirement with my own 401k and/or IRA

 retirement accounts. The government has no right nor responsibility to tell me what I can or cannot do with my

 personal property including my retirement accounts. Should I decide to fund SpaceX great. Buy or sell property,

 fantastic. Start a llama farm, even better. Give my money to charity, buy a goat, or decide to tour the conutry in

 a VW microbus... My CHOICE. 

Truth is I would likely invest in some boring companies which have a great success record & reap the rewards

 which come with company share ownership. Point is::

My CHOICE what to do with MY retirement savings.