alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 23 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 23

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any portion 
of the Federal budget surplus attributable to the Department of Defense 
 Military Retirement Fund should be used exclusively for the financing 
    of the military retirement and survivor benefit programs of the 
                         Department of Defense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2001

  Mr. Hill (for himself and Mr. Taylor of Mississippi) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
   Budget, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any portion 
of the Federal budget surplus attributable to the Department of Defense 
 Military Retirement Fund should be used exclusively for the financing 
    of the military retirement and survivor benefit programs of the 
                         Department of Defense.

Whereas the Congress has made commitments to balance the Federal budget without 
        including the surpluses of trust funds dedicated to particular purposes, 
        such as the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund, the Disability 
        Insurance Trust Fund, and the Hospital Insurance Trust Fund;
Whereas the assets of the Department of Defense Military Retirement Fund are 
        used to finance the military retirement and survivor benefit programs of 
        the Department of Defense;
Whereas the Department of Defense Military Retirement Fund is facing a long-term 
        unfunded actuarial liability which will require all of the fund's 
        current surplus to pay the retirement and survivor benefits promised to 
        current and future members of the Armed Forces; and
Whereas the assets in the Department of Defense Military Retirement Fund are 
        included in the calculation of the Federal budget surplus and account 
        for approximately $100,000,000,000 of the estimated Federal budget 
        surplus during the next 10 years: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
any portion of the Federal budget surplus attributable to the 
Department of Defense Military Retirement Fund should be used 
exclusively for the financing of the military retirement and survivor 
benefit programs of the Department of Defense, and not for the 
financing of tax policy changes, new Federal spending, or any other 
purpose.
                                 <all>
```
1210-AB32-2-1351.html[7/26/2015 2:20:36 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvz-ln5x

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1847

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Dear FEDERAL GOVERNMENT,

Please keep your greedy hands off of the money I worked to earn and SAVE! I do not NEED or want your

 "help."
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0940.html[7/21/2015 6:34:31 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-wn5w

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0940

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Planning for one's own retirement should be left to the individual. This is an issue government should stay out

 of!
From: susan.haslam@yahoo.com [mailto:susan.haslam@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:26 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Susan Haslam 

4331 Mercier, Apt 1N 

Kansas City, MO 64111
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 1:05 AM

Received: July 20, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k32-urz9

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2539

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Douglas Allen

Address: 

1261 Crescent Drive

Baton Rouge, 70806

General Comment

I don't understand why these regulations are needed. Any individual with the fore thought of 

putting money into and IRA or 401k doesn't need to be told what they can and cannot do with the 

money they themselves have contributed. Do not tell me what to do!
<PAGE>
                                                     Exhibit 23.2
                                                     ------------
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
=================================================================

Nichols, Rise & Company




The Board of Directors
CMI Corporation


   We  consent  to incorporation by reference in the registration
statement on Form S-8 of CMI Corporation filed on July 12,  1993,
of  our report dated January 28, 1994, relating to the statements
of  operations, division capital and cash flows of Load  King,  a
division  of  CMI  Corporation, for the year ended  December  31,
1993,  which  report  appears in the December  31,  1995,  annual
report on Form 10-K of CMI Corporation.




218 South Ridge Plaza
South Sioux City, Nebraska
February 3, 1996
#### Peter Daws, *Respondent, v.*Samuel Daws and others, *Appel*lants.—

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements, and motion to strike out trial fee denied.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0905.html[7/21/2015 6:00:05 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-476w

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0905

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: stephen ziehms

Address:

2124 Harold St

Apt#5

Green Bay, WI, 54302

Email: ziehmss39@yahoo.com

Phone: 9205850169

General Comment

I want to plan my own retirement
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1195.html[7/22/2015 3:36:17 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-ynk7

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1195

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Dan Savage

General Comment

I can handle my own retirement. Thank you!
**Exhibit 24.3**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS** that I, **Nicholas DeBenedictis**do hereby appoint JohnW. Rowe and William A. Von Hoene, Jr., or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2008 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto,to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**Nicholas DeBenedictis**

**DATE: February 2, 2009**
Editorial Note on Part 386
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 386 appear at 65 FR 7755, Feb. 16, 2000, and 88 FR 80182, Nov. 17, 2023.

§ 386.62 Review of administrative law judge's decision. ( a ) All petitions to review must be accompanied by exceptions and briefs. Each petition must set out in detail objections to the initial decision and shall state whether such objections are related to alleged errors of law or fact. It shall also state the relief requested. Failure to object to any error in the initial decision shall waive the right to allege such error in subsequent proceedings.
( b ) Reply briefs may be filed within 30 days after service of the appeal brief.
( c ) No other briefs shall be permitted except upon request of the Agency Decisionmaker.
( d ) Copies of all briefs must be served on all parties.
( e ) No oral argument will be permitted except on order of the Agency Decisionmaker.
**Exhibit 24-13**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS** that I, **Don Thompson** do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and William A. Von Hoene, Jr., oreither of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2007 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities andExchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**Don Thompson**

**DATE: February 4, 2008**
#### Bell v. Preville.

1. Chattel Mortgages.

A proviso in a chattel mortgage covering a stock in trade that until default the mortgagor should retain and enjoy the property, selling and disposing of the same, renders the mortgage void as to creditors of the mortgagor.

2. Appellate Practice.

The validity of a chattel mortgage will not be considered on appeal when it appears from the bill of exceptions it was introduced, but the instrument was not set forth, nor any part of it; nor is there a statement concerning its purport or effect, as provided by section 392 of the code. It will be assumed that the disposition of the question by the trial court was correct.

*Appeal from the District Court of Olear Creek County.*

Messrs. Rogers, Cuthbert & Ellis, for appellant.

*No*appearance for appellee.

Thomson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from a judgment in replevin. The appellee, as plaintiff, brought his action to recover a number of gold and silver watches alleged to be wrongfully detained by the defendant. The defendant answered that he was in possession of the property by virtue of a writ of attachment levied upon it by him as sheriff of Clear Creek county, in a suit of Daniels & Fisher against Angelina Rapin, the owner *42of the property, and that the claim of the plaintiff was based upon a chattel mortgage which was given to him in the course of trade, and provided that until default the mortgagor should retain and enjoy the property, selling and disposing of the same. The allegations of the answer were denied by the replication.

The argument of the appellant is that the mortgage, by reason of a proviso which it is said to contain, that until default the mortgagor might retain possession of the goods and use and enjoy them, is without validity as to creditors. It is settled in this state, by a series of decisions of the supreme court and this court, that such a proviso in a chattel mortgage covering a stock in trade, renders the mortgage void as to creditors of the mortgagor; but outside of the statement of counsel in their brief, and an allegation in the answer which was denied, we have no information whether the mortgage in question contained that proviso or not. It appears from the bill of exceptions that a chattel mortgage was introduced in evidence; but the instrument is not set forth, nor any part of it; nor is there any statement concerning its purport or effect, as provided by section 392 of the code. There being nothing in the record to impart to us a knowledge of the contents of the paper, it is impossible for us to pass upon the question discussed by counsel as affecting this case, and we must assume the correctness of its disposition by the trial court. As there is no other question involved, the judgment will be affirmed..

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph J. Lazzara, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Scientific Technologies Incorporated
for the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly represents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Scientific Technologies Incorporated.

|Dated: August 15, 2005 | By:/s/Joseph J. Lazzara_______              
|---------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|                       | Name: Joseph J. Lazzara                     
|                       | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer







I, Richard O. Faria, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Scientific Technologies
Incorporated for the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly
represents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Scientific Technologies
Incorporated.

|Dated: August 15, 2005 | By:/s/ Richard O. Faria_______                   
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------
|                       | Name: Richard O. Faria                           
|                       | Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0565.html[7/20/2015 8:59:24 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-pjzc

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0565

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Janell Johns

General Comment

We the people have managed to survive all these years without your rule changing strategy. I would suggest you

 focus on something else for your meddling.
###### Editorial Note on Part 387

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 387 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 387.15 Forms.

Endorsements for policies of insurance (Form MCS-90) and surety bonds (Form MCS-82) must be in the form prescribed by the FMCSA and approved by the OMB. Endorsements to policies of insurance and surety bonds shall specify that coverage thereunder will remain in effect continuously until terminated, as required in § 387.7 of this subpart. The continuous coverage requirement does not apply to Mexican motor carriers insured under § 387.7(b)(3) of this subpart. The endorsement and surety bond shall be issued in the exact name of the motor carrier. The Forms MCS-82 and MCS-90 are available from the FMCSA website at *http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/mission/forms.*

[83 FR 16226, Apr. 16, 2018]
1210-AB32-2-1353.html[7/26/2015 2:20:38 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvz-xw97

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1849

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: anonymous anonymous

General Comment

this is a comment
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 6/12/15 9:16 AM

Received: June 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jck-mcms

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0315

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Matthew Di Francesco

General Comment

While I am a firm believer in our fiduciary responsibilities as financial advisors, and I promote 

that responsibility with my clients, prospects and all those I work with in my practice, I am 

concerned that the DOL is not taking sufficient time to analyze how the rule will impact my 

clients and my business practices, especially within the IRA sphere. 

A properly constructed rule would provide the adequate protections to clients, yet allow 

advisors to be able to provide the best guidance possible. With the complexities in the 

retirement landscape, the DOL needs thoughtful, constructive commentary" that will be helpful 

in their review of the proposal.

Because of the length and complexity of the proposal, neither of the above objectives can be 

adequately accomplished within the 90-day comment period that is currently attached to the 

proposal, and I would ask you to reconsider the time frame to ensure that the proposal truly 

looks out in the best interests of clients who require the services of advisors to properly plan for 

a fruitful retirement. This can only be done with a proper commentary from practicing fiduciary 

advisors and their representatives.

Sincerely,

Matthew J Di Francesco

Summit Brokerage Services

RIN 1210-AB32

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b2b3e3&format=xml&show... 6/12/2015
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 260

Waiving clause 5(a) of rule XII of the rules of the House of Representatives

to permit introduction and consideration of a bill to amend title 36,

United States Code, to designate September 11 as United We Stand

Remembrance Day.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 10, 2001

Mr. FOSSELLA (for himself, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. GILMAN, Mr.

REYNOLDS, Mr. GRUCCI, Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Mr. ENGEL, Mr.

KING, Mr. NADLER, Mr. TOWNS, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr.

WALSH, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. FORBES, Mr.

ENGLISH, Mr. SCHROCK, Mr. SHERWOOD, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. MORAN of

Virginia, and Mr. LAHOOD) submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Waiving clause 5(a) of rule XII of the rules of the House

of Representatives to permit introduction and consideration of a bill to amend title 36, United States Code,

to designate September 11 as United We Stand Remembrance Day.

1 Resolved, That notwithstanding clause 5(a) of rule

2 XII of the rules of House of Representatives, Representa3 tive Fossella of New York may introduce, and the House

4 may consider, a bill to amend title 36, United States Code,
2

•HRES 260 IH

1 to designate September 11 as United We Stand Remem2 brance Day.

Æ
Soldiers patrol to school, encourage students
 By Sgt. David Nye , 4th BCT, 82nd Airborne Division
  A soldier with the Afghan National Army’s 2nd Kandak, 3rd Brigade, 205th Infantry Corps gives small food items to a local girl during a foot patrol in Zharay district, Kandahar province June 9. The intent of the patrol was to interact more with the local people. (Photo by Sgt. David Nye)
 ZHARAY DISTRICT, Afghanistan (June 20, 2012) — “Non-lethal projects are the biggest part of [counter-insurgency],” said 1st Lt. Nathan B. Mulcahy, a platoon leader in Bravo Troop. “This war isn’t measured in body counts or ground gained, it’s measured in progress with the Afghan people.” First Lt. Mulcahy, standing in the summer sun of Afghanistan in combat gear, is out to make that progress happen. On June 9, he and his men moved with civil affairs soldiers through an area of Zharay district, Kandahar province. The mission wasn’t to attack Taliban or destroy caches, but to continue building relations with the Afghans in the Bravo Troop 1st Squadron, 14th Cavalry Regiment area.The patrol left a small combat outpost in southern Zharay and soldiers walked a winding route through the fields to a small bazaar where they talked to local store owners and farmers. Their route continued to a school and a community center.“We’re promoting the schools and rebuilding,” said 1st Lt. Mulcahy. “Also, an ex-Taliban school will become a community center for people to congregate in. The goal is to help the community get to where they can support themselves and resist the Taliban.”