FORM 10-QSB--QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                        Quarterly or Transitional Report



                      U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

                    For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001


[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-11935


                            CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX
         (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                              94-2887133
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                      (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)


Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act  during the  preceding  12 months (or for such
shorter period that the  registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No___



                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

a)

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                          (in thousands, except unit data)

                                  June 30, 2001

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Assets
<S>                                                          <C>            <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                $ 1,070
   Receivables and deposits                                                   1,016
   Restricted escrows                                                           117
   Other assets                                                                 602
   Investment properties:
      Land                                                   $ 11,635
      Buildings and related personal property                  89,656
                                                              101,291
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (50,994)       50,297
                                                                           $ 53,102
Liabilities and Partners' (Deficit) Capital
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                        $    222
   Tenant security deposits payable                                             317
   Accrued property taxes                                                       691
   Due to former affiliate                                                      270
   Other liabilities                                                          1,099
   Mortgage notes payable                                                    58,441

Partners' (Deficit) Capital:
   General partner                                           $ (9,681)
   Limited partners (89,292 units issued and
      outstanding)                                              1,743        (7,938)
                                                                           $ 53,102


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


<PAGE>




b)

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except per unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                           Three Months               Six Months
                                          Ended June 30,            Ended June 30,
                                         2001         2000         2001        2000

   Revenues:
<S>                                    <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
      Rental income                    $ 4,130      $ 4,193      $ 8,321      $ 8,340
      Other income                         375          256          657          421
      Gain on casualty                      --           --          156           --
          Total revenues                 4,505        4,449        9,134        8,761
   Expenses:
      Operating                          1,492        1,283        2,865        2,723
      General and administrative           126           85          246          164
      Depreciation                         872          825        1,735        1,626
      Interest                           1,439        1,214        2,642        2,431
      Property tax                         354          325          704          714
          Total expenses                 4,283        3,732        8,192        7,658

   Net income                           $  222       $  717       $  942       $1,103

   Net income allocated to
      general partner                   $   26       $   85       $  111       $  130
   Net income allocated to
      limited partners                     196          632          831          973

                                        $  222       $  717       $  942       $1,103

   Net income per limited
      partnership unit                  $ 2.20       $ 7.08       $ 9.31      $ 10.90

   Distributions per limited
      partnership unit                  $ 8.20       $34.82       $21.78       $34.82

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


<PAGE>


c)

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

               CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' (DEFICIT) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)
                          (in thousands, except unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                     Limited
                                   Partnership   General      Limited
                                      Units      Partner     Partners       Total

<S>                                   <C>          <C>        <C>          <C>
Original capital contributions        89,292     $    --      $89,292      $89,292

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at December 31, 2000               89,292     $(9,532)     $ 2,857      $(6,675)

Distributions paid to partners            --        (260)      (1,945)      (2,205)

Net income for the six months
   ended June 30, 2001                    --         111          831          942

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at June 30, 2001                   89,292     $(9,681)     $ 1,743      $(7,938)



            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


<PAGE>



d)
                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                   (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  Six Months Ended
                                                                        June 30,
                                                                  2001        2000
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                              <C>         <C>
  Net income                                                     $ 942       $ 1,103
  Casualty gain                                                    (156)          --
  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
   cash provided by operating activities:
      Depreciation                                                1,735        1,626
      Amortization of loan costs and discount                        49           50
      Change in accounts:
       Receivables and deposits                                    (120)        (266)
       Other assets                                                (106)         (30)
       Accounts payable                                             (16)          93
       Tenant security deposits payable                              (1)           6
       Accrued property taxes                                       176           95
       Other liabilities                                             (3)         (63)
         Net cash provided by operating activities                2,500        2,614

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                         (1,044)      (1,041)
  Net insurance proceeds received                                   223           --
  Net withdrawals from restricted escrows                             9           84
         Net cash used in investing activities                     (812)        (957)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payment on mortgage notes payable                                (585)        (341)
  Distributions to partners                                      (2,205)      (3,525)
         Net cash used in financing activities                   (2,790)      (3,866)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                        (1,102)      (2,209)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                  2,172        2,900
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                      $ 1,070      $   691

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                        $ 2,350      $ 2,381

At  December  31,  2000  and  June  30,  2001,  accounts  payable  and  property
improvements and replacements were adjusted by approximately $132,000.

At June 30,  2000  property  improvements  and  replacements  were  adjusted  by
$165,000 for  property  improvements  and  replacements  in accounts  payable at
December 31, 1999.


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>




e)
                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                     NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The  accompanying   unaudited   consolidated  financial  statements  of  Century
Properties Fund XIX (the  "Partnership" or  "Registrant")  have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial statements. The general partner of the Partnership is Fox Partners II,
a California  general  partnership.  The general partners of Fox Partners II are
Fox Capital Management Corporation ("FCMC" or the "Managing General Partner"), a
California  corporation,  Fox Realty  Investors  ("FRI"),  a California  general
partnership, and Fox Partners 83, a California general partnership. The Managing
General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment  Investment and Management  Company
("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. In the opinion of the
Managing  General  Partner,  all  adjustments  (consisting  of normal  recurring
accruals)  considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.
Operating  results for the three and six month  periods  ended June 30, 2001 are
not  necessarily  indicative  of the results that may be expected for the fiscal
year  ending  December  31,  2001.  For  further   information,   refer  to  the
consolidated   financial  statements  and  footnotes  thereto  included  in  the
Partnership's  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December
31, 2000.

Principles of Consolidation

The Registrant's  financial  statements  include the accounts of Misty Woods CPF
19, LLC, a limited liability  company in which the Registrant  ultimately owns a
100% economic  interest.  All significant  inter-entity  transactions  have been
eliminated.

Segment Reporting

Statement of Financial  Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 131, "Disclosure about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" established standards for the
way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments
in annual  financial  statements  and  requires  that those  enterprises  report
selected  information about operating segments in interim financial reports.  It
also established  standards for related disclosures about products and services,
geographic  areas,  and  major  customers.  As  defined  in SFAS  No.  131,  the
Partnership has only one reportable segment. Moreover, due to the very nature of
the  Partnership's  operations,  the  Managing  General  Partner  believes  that
segment-based disclosures will not result in a more meaningful presentation than
the consolidated financial statements as presently presented.

Note B - Casualty Gain

In February 2001, one of the Partnership's investment properties, McMillan Place
Apartments,  incurred damages to its buildings as a result of a hail storm. As a
result of the damage,  approximately  $142,000 of fixed assets and approximately
$75,000 of  accumulated  depreciation  were written off resulting in a net write
off of approximately  $67,000. The property received  approximately  $223,000 in
proceeds from the insurance  company to repair the damaged units.  For financial
statement purposes, a casualty gain of approximately  $156,000 was recognized as
a result of the difference  between the proceeds received and the net book value
of the buildings which were damaged.


<PAGE>

Note C - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Registrant has no employees and is dependent on the Managing General Partner
and its  affiliates for the management  and  administration  of all  Partnership
activities.  The  Partnership  Agreement  provides  for (i) certain  payments to
affiliates for services and (ii)  reimbursement of certain expenses  incurred by
affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

The following  amounts to the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates were
incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000:

                                                                  2001      2000
                                                                  (in thousands)
 Property management fees (included in operating expenses)        $458      $444
 Reimbursement for services of affiliates (included in
   general and administrative and operating expenses
   and investment properties)                                       84        88
 Partnership management fee (included in general partner
   distributions)                                                  221       353

During the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000,  affiliates  of the Managing
General  Partner were  entitled to receive 5% of gross  receipts from all of the
Registrant's  properties  as  compensation  for  providing  property  management
services.  The Registrant  paid to such  affiliates  approximately  $458,000 and
$444,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  received   reimbursement  of
accountable  administrative  expenses  amounting  to  approximately  $84,000 and
$88,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Pursuant  to  the  Partnership  Agreement,  for  managing  the  affairs  of  the
Partnership, the general partner is entitled to receive a Partnership management
fee  equal  to  10%  of the  Partnership's  adjusted  cash  from  operations  as
distributed.  Approximately $221,000 and $353,000 in Partnership management fees
were paid along with the  distributions  from operations  which were made during
the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  has  made  available  to the
Partnership  a  credit  line  of  up to  $150,000  per  property  owned  by  the
Partnership.  The Partnership has no outstanding  amounts due under this line of
credit. Based on present plans, the Managing General Partner does not anticipate
the need to borrow in the near future. Other than cash and cash equivalents, the
line of credit is the Partnership's only unused source of liquidity.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 49,973.66 limited partnership units
in the  Partnership  representing  55.97% of the  outstanding  units at June 30,
2001. A number of these units were  acquired  pursuant to tender  offers made by
AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its  affiliates  will
acquire additional limited partnership  interests in the Partnership for cash or
in exchange  for units in the  operating  partnership  of AIMCO  either  through
private purchases or tender offers. Under the Partnership Agreement, unitholders
holding a majority of the Units are  entitled  to take action with  respect to a
variety of matters,  which would include without  limitation,  voting on certain
amendments  to the  Partnership  Agreement  and  voting to remove  the  Managing
General  Partner.  As a result of its  ownership  of  55.97% of the  outstanding
units,  AIMCO is in a position to influence all voting decisions with respect to
the Registrant.  When voting on matters,  AIMCO would in all likelihood vote the
Units it acquired in a manner  favorable to the interest of the Managing General
Partner because of its affiliation with the Managing  General Partner.  However,
IPLP,  an  affiliate  of the  Managing  General  Partner,  is  required  to vote
25,228.66 of its Units:  (i) against any proposal to increase the fees and other
compensation  payable by the Partnership to the Managing General Partner and any
of  its  affiliates;  and  (ii)  on all  other  matters  submitted  by it or its
affiliates,  in  proportion  to the votes cast by non  tendering  unit  holders.
Except for the foregoing,  no other limitations are imposed on IPLP's or AIMCO's
right to vote its Units.

Note D - Distribution

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2001,  the  Partnership  distributed
approximately  $2,205,000  (approximately  $1,945,000  to the limited  partners,
$21.78 per  limited  partnership  unit) from  operations.  During the six months
ended  June 30,  2000,  the  Partnership  distributed  approximately  $3,525,000
(approximately  $3,109,000  to  the  limited  partners  or  $34.82  per  limited
partnership unit) from operations.

Note E - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial  Group,  Inc., et al. in the Superior Court of the State of California
for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs  named as defendants,  among others,
the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and several of their affiliated
partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action  purports to assert claims on
behalf of a class of limited  partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of
limited  partnerships  (including  the  Partnership)  which are named as nominal
defendants,  challenging,  among other things,  the  acquisition of interests in
certain general partner entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia")
and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia; past tender offers
by the Insignia affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;  management of
the partnerships by the Insignia  affiliates;  the series of transactions  which
closed on October 1, 1998 and February  26, 1999  whereby  Insignia and Insignia
Properties  Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  seek
monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial  dissolution of the
Partnership.  On June 25, 1998,  the  Managing  General  Partner  filed a motion
seeking  dismissal  of the action.  In lieu of  responding  to the  motion,  the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The  Managing  General  Partner  filed
demurrers to the amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order sustaining defendants' demurrer on certain grounds.  Plaintiffs have until
August 16, 2001 to file a fourth amended complaint. The Managing General Partner
does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs,  whether  legal  or  settlement  costs,
associated  with  this  case  will  be  material  to the  Partnership's  overall
operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.


<PAGE>




ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The  matters  discussed  in this Form  10-QSB  contain  certain  forward-looking
statements  and  involve  risks and  uncertainties  (including  changing  market
conditions,   competitive  and  regulatory   matters,   etc.)  detailed  in  the
disclosures  contained  in this  Form  10-QSB  and the  other  filings  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission made by the Registrant from time to time. The
discussion of the  Registrant's  business and results of  operations,  including
forward-looking  statements  pertaining  to such  matters,  does not  take  into
account the effects of any changes to the  Registrant's  business and results of
operations.  Accordingly,  actual  results  could differ  materially  from those
projected in the forward-looking  statements as a result of a number of factors,
including those identified herein.

The Partnership's  investment  properties consist of eight apartment  complexes.
The following  table sets forth the average  occupancy of the properties for the
six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000:

                                                   Average Occupancy
      Property                                      2001       2000

      Sunrunner Apartments                          96%        97%
         St. Petersburg, Florida
      Misty Woods Apartments                        90%        93%
         Charlotte, North Carolina
      McMillan Place Apartments                     97%        96%
         Dallas, Texas
      Vinings Peak Apartments                       93%        96%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Wood Lake Apartments                          92%        95%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Plantation Crossing                           88%        95%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Greenspoint Apartments                        94%        94%
         Phoenix, Arizona
      Sandspoint Apartments                         95%        94%
         Phoenix, Arizona

The  decrease in occupancy at Vinings  Peak  Apartments,  Wood Lake  Apartments,
Plantation  Crossing  Apartments,  and  Misty  Woods  Apartments  is  due to the
competitive  market of the apartment industry in the Atlanta and Charlotte areas
and the  purchase  of new homes by the  apartments  tenants.  Additionally,  the
Managing  General  Partner  attributes  the  decrease in  occupancy at Wood Lake
Apartments and Plantation  Crossing  Apartments to numerous evictions during the
current  year.  Management is evicting  tenants who are not  complying  with the
collection policy in an effort to improve the tenant base.

Results of Operations

The Partnership realized net income of approximately $942,000 and $1,103,000 for
the six month periods ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively.  For the three
month periods ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, the Partnership  realized net income
of  approximately  $222,000 and  $717,000,  respectively.  The  decreases in net
income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2001 are  attributable
to an  increase  in total  expenses  partially  offset by an  increase  in total
revenues.  The increase in total  expenses  for the three and six month  periods
ended June 30,  2001 is  primarily  attributable  to an  increase in general and
administrative  expenses,  operating expense,  interest expense and depreciation
expense.  General and  administrative  expenses  increased due to an increase in
professional  fees and  services.  The increase in  operating  expenses for both
periods is the result of increased  property  expense and  advertising  expense.
Property expense increased for both periods at several investment properties due
to increased  utility costs as a result of the decrease in  occupancy.  Property
expense  also  increased  due to an increase in  employee  salaries  and related
benefits  at several of the  Partnership's  investment  properties.  Advertising
increased  as a result of the  decline in  occupancy  at five of the  investment
properties.  Depreciation expense increased for both periods due to the addition
of property improvements and replacements that were placed in service during the
past twelve months and are now being depreciated.  Interest expense increased as
a result of the contingency for additional interest on McMillan Place Apartments
as discussed  below.  Property tax expense  increased for the three months ended
June 30,  2001  due to the  timing  and  receipt  of  invoices  from the  taxing
authorities that affected prior estimates.

Included  in general and  administrative  expense at both June 30, 2001 and 2000
are reimbursements to the Managing General Partner allowed under the Partnership
Agreement.  In  addition,   costs  associated  with  the  quarterly  and  annual
communications with investors and regulatory agencies are also included.

The increase in total revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001,
is attributable to an increase in other income. The increase in other income for
both  properties is primarily  attributable  to the  collection of late charges,
utility  reimbursements,  and lease  cancellation fees being enforced at several
properties.  Total revenue also increased for the six months ended June 30, 2001
due to a casualty  gain at McMillan  Place  Apartments as discussed  below.  The
decrease in rental income is primarily due to decreases in average  occupancy at
five  of  the  investment  properties  and an  increase  in  bad  debt  expense,
especially at Plantation  Crossing  Apartments,  which was largely  offset by an
increase in the average rental rates at all of the investment properties.

In February 2001, one of the Partnership's investment properties, McMillan Place
Apartments,  incurred damages to its buildings as a result of a hail storm. As a
result of the damage,  approximately  $142,000 of fixed assets and approximately
$75,000 of  accumulated  depreciation  were written off resulting in a net write
off of approximately  $67,000. The property received  approximately  $223,000 in
proceeds from the insurance  company to repair the damaged units.  For financial
statement purposes, a casualty gain of approximately  $156,000 was recognized as
a result of the difference  between the proceeds received and the net book value
of the buildings which were damaged.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the Managing General
Partner monitors the rental market  environment of its investment  properties to
assess the feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy
levels and protecting  the  Partnership  from increases in expenses.  As part of
this plan, the Managing General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from
the burden of  inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and
maintaining a high overall  occupancy  level.  However,  due to changing  market
conditions,  which  can  result  in the use of  rental  concessions  and  rental
reductions to offset softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the
Managing General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2001, the Registrant had cash and cash  equivalents of approximately
$1,070,000 as compared to  approximately  $691,000 at June 30, 2000. For the six
months ended June 30, 2001, cash and cash  equivalents  decreased  approximately
$1,102,000  from  the   Registrant's   year  ended  December  31,  2000  due  to
approximately  $2,790,000 of cash used in financing activities and approximately
$812,000 of cash used in investing  activities partially offset by approximately
$2,500,000 of cash provided by operating activities.  Net cash used in financing
activities  consisted  of  distributions  to partners  and, to a lesser  extent,
payments  of  principal  made  on the  mortgages  encumbering  the  Registrant's
investment  properties.  Net cash  used in  investing  activities  consisted  of
capital  improvements  and replacements  partially offset by insurance  proceeds
received for a casualty, as discussed above, and net withdrawals from restricted
escrows maintained by the mortgage lenders.  The Partnership invests its working
capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures  required at the  properties  to  adequately  maintain the physical
assets and other  operating  needs of the Registrant and to comply with Federal,
state, and local legal and regulatory requirements. Capital improvements planned
for each of the Registrant's properties are detailed below.

Sunrunner Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2001,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately  $31,000 of capital  improvements  consisting  primarily  of floor
covering  and  appliance  replacements.  These  improvements  were  funded  from
Partnership  reserves and operating cash flow. The Partnership has budgeted for,
but  is not  limited  to,  capital  improvements  of  $130,000  at the  property
consisting  primarily  of  floor  covering  and  appliance  replacements,   roof
replacements,   contract  painting,   and  air  conditioning  and  water  heater
replacements.  Additional  improvements may be considered and will depend on the
physical  condition  of  the  property  as  well  as  replacement  reserves  and
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Misty Woods Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2001,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately  $80,000 of capital improvements  consisting primarily of building
improvements,   floor   covering   and   appliance   replacement,   parking  lot
improvements,  wall coverings, and interior decoration.  These improvements were
funded from operating cash flow.  The  Partnership  has budgeted for, but is not
limited to, capital improvements of $70,000 at the property consisting primarily
of floor covering and appliance replacements,  wall coverings,  air conditioning
unit  upgrades,  interior  decoration and parking lot  improvements.  Additional
improvements may be considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the
property as well as replacement  reserves and anticipated cash flow generated by
the property.

McMillian Place Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2001,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately  $163,000 of capital  improvements  consisting  primarily of floor
covering  and  appliance  replacements,   interior  decoration,  other  building
improvements, and water heaters. These improvements were funded from Partnership
reserves,  operating  cash flow and  insurance  proceeds.  The  Partnership  has
budgeted  for, but is not limited to,  capital  improvements  of $121,000 at the
property  consisting   primarily  of  appliance   replacement,   floor  covering
replacements,   interior   decoration,   and  countertop  and  air  conditioning
replacements.  Additional  improvements may be considered and will depend on the
physical  condition  of  the  property  as  well  as  replacement  reserves  and
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Vinings Peak Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2001,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately  $124,000 of capital  improvements  consisting  primarily of other
building   improvements,   floor  covering  and  appliance   replacements,   air
conditioning upgrades,  water heater, and recreational facilities  improvements.
These  improvements  were funded from operating cash flow. The  Partnership  has
budgeted  for, but is not limited to,  capital  improvements  of $125,000 at the
property consisting primarily of floor covering and appliance replacements,  and
interior decoration.  Additional  improvements may be considered and will depend
on the physical  condition of the property as well as  replacement  reserves and
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Wood Lake Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2001,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately  $114,000 of capital  improvements  consisting  primarily of other
building improvements, floor covering and appliance replacements, water heaters,
roof upgrades,  and plumbing  improvements.  These improvements were funded from
operating  cash flow. The  Partnership  has budgeted for, but is not limited to,
capital  improvements of $129,000 at the property consisting  primarily of floor
covering and appliance replacements and other building improvements.  Additional
improvements may be considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the
property as well as replacement  reserves and anticipated cash flow generated by
the property.

Plantation Crossing Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2001,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately  $150,000 of capital  improvements  consisting  primarily of other
building improvements, plumbing improvements, structural improvements, and floor
covering  and  appliance  replacements.  These  improvements  were  funded  from
operating  cash flow. The  Partnership  has budgeted for, but is not limited to,
capital  improvements of $143,000 at the property consisting  primarily of floor
covering  and  appliance  replacements,   wall  coverings,  and  other  building
improvements.  Additional  improvements may be considered and will depend on the
physical  condition  of  the  property  as  well  as  replacement  reserves  and
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Greenspoint Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2001,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately   $141,000  of  capital   improvements   consisting  primarily  of
structural and plumbing improvements, floor covering and appliance replacements,
and parking lot enhancements. These improvements were funded from operating cash
flow.  The  Partnership  has  budgeted  for,  but is  not  limited  to,  capital
improvements of $224,000 at the property consisting  primarily of floor covering
and  appliance   replacements,   roof   replacements,   air  conditioning   unit
replacements,   and  plumbing  improvements.   Additional  improvements  may  be
considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as well as
replacement reserves and anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Sands Point Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2001,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately $109,000 of capital improvements  consisting primarily of plumbing
enhancements,   ground  lighting  enhancements,  roof  replacements,  and  floor
covering  and  appliance  replacements.  These  improvements  were  funded  from
operating  cash flow. The  Partnership  has budgeted for, but is not limited to,
capital  improvements of $158,000 at the property consisting  primarily of floor
covering and appliance  replacements,  air conditioning unit replacements,  roof
replacements, swimming pool improvements, plumbing improvements, and parking lot
resurfacing.  Additional  improvements  may be considered and will depend on the
physical  condition  of  the  property  as  well  as  replacement  reserves  and
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

The additional  capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available
from operations or from Partnership  reserves.  To the extent that such budgeted
capital improvements are completed, the Registrant's distributable cash flow, if
any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

In  connection  with the  January  29,  1998  modification  of the  terms of the
mortgages  encumbering  McMillan Place  Apartments,  the first mortgage requires
additional interest to be paid upon maturity at October 31, 2002 equal to 50% of
the increase in the  appreciated  fair market value of the  property,  which was
stipulated as $12,860,000 at the time of the restructuring. At December 31, 2000
and June 30, 2001, the Managing General Partner estimated that there had been an
increase in the fair market value of McMillan Place Apartments.  A liability for
$250,000 was recorded at December 31, 2000 and is included in other liabilities.
An  additional  liability  for  $250,000  was  recorded  at June 30, 2001 and is
included in other liabilities and interest expense.

The Partnership's  current assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term
needs  (exclusive  of capital  improvements)  of the  Partnership.  The mortgage
indebtedness of approximately  $58,441,000,  net of discount,  is amortized over
varying  periods with  required  balloon  payments  ranging from October 2002 to
January  2006.  The Managing  General  Partner  will  attempt to refinance  such
indebtedness  and/or sell the properties  prior to such maturity  dates.  If the
properties cannot be refinanced or sold for a sufficient  amount, the Registrant
will risk losing such properties through foreclosure.

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2001,  the  Partnership  distributed
approximately  $2,205,000  (approximately  $1,945,000 to the limited partners or
$21.78 per  limited  partnership  unit) from  operations.  During the six months
ended  June 30,  2000,  the  Partnership  distributed  approximately  $3,525,000
(approximately  $3,109,000  to  the  limited  partners  or  $34.82  per  limited
partnership   unit)  from   operations.   The  Registrant  is  prohibited   from
distributing  cash from  McMillan  Place  operations  due to debt  restrictions.
However,  the  Registrant  can  distribute  cash from the remaining  properties'
operations.  The  Partnership's  distribution  policy is  reviewed  on a monthly
basis. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated
from  operations,  the  availability  of cash  reserves  and the  timing of debt
maturities,  refinancings,  and/or  property  sales.  There can be no assurance,
however,  that the Partnership  will generate  sufficient  funds from operations
after required capital  expenditures to permit any further  distributions to its
partners during the remainder of 2001 or subsequent periods.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 49,973.66 limited partnership units
in the  Partnership  representing  55.97% of the  outstanding  units at June 30,
2001. A number of these units were  acquired  pursuant to tender  offers made by
AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its  affiliates  will
acquire additional limited partnership  interests in the Partnership for cash or
in exchange  for units in the  operating  partnership  of AIMCO  either  through
private purchases or tender offers. Under the Partnership Agreement, unitholders
holding a majority of the Units are  entitled  to take action with  respect to a
variety of matters,  which would include without  limitation,  voting on certain
amendments  to the  Partnership  Agreement  and  voting to remove  the  Managing
General  Partner.  As a result of its  ownership  of  55.97% of the  outstanding
units,  AIMCO is in a position to influence all voting decisions with respect to
the Registrant.  When voting on matters,  AIMCO would in all likelihood vote the
Units it acquired in a manner  favorable to the interest of the Managing General
Partner because of its affiliation with the Managing  General Partner.  However,
IPLP,  an  affiliate  of the  Managing  General  Partner,  is  required  to vote
25,228.66 of its Units:  (i) against any proposal to increase the fees and other
compensation  payable by the Partnership to the Managing General Partner and any
of  its  affiliates;  and  (ii)  on all  other  matters  submitted  by it or its
affiliates,  in  proportion  to the votes cast by non  tendering  unit  holders.
Except for the foregoing,  no other limitations are imposed on IPLP's or AIMCO's
right to vote its Units.


<PAGE>


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial  Group,  Inc., et al. in the Superior Court of the State of California
for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs  named as defendants,  among others,
the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and several of their affiliated
partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action  purports to assert claims on
behalf of a class of limited  partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of
limited  partnerships  (including  the  Partnership)  which are named as nominal
defendants,  challenging,  among other things,  the  acquisition of interests in
certain general partner entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia")
and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia; past tender offers
by the Insignia affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;  management of
the partnerships by the Insignia  affiliates;  the series of transactions  which
closed on October 1, 1998 and February  26, 1999  whereby  Insignia and Insignia
Properties  Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  seek
monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial  dissolution of the
Partnership.  On June 25, 1998,  the  Managing  General  Partner  filed a motion
seeking  dismissal  of the action.  In lieu of  responding  to the  motion,  the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The  Managing  General  Partner  filed
demurrers to the amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order sustaining defendants' demurrer on certain grounds.  Plaintiffs have until
August 16, 2001 to file a fourth amended complaint. The Managing General Partner
does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs,  whether  legal  or  settlement  costs,
associated  with  this  case  will  be  material  to the  Partnership's  overall
operations.


<PAGE>



ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a)    Exhibits:

                  None.

            b)    Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended June 30, 2001.



<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX


                                    By:   FOX PARTNERS II
                                          Its General Partner


                                    By:   FOX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
                                          Its Managing General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Controller


                                    Date: July 31, 2001