alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 33.31 Priority ratings. ( a ) *Levels of priority.* ( 1 ) There are two levels of priority established by the Transportation Priorities and Allocations System regulations, identified by the rating symbols “DO” and “DX”.
( 2 ) All DO-rated orders have equal priority with each other and take precedence over unrated orders. All DX-rated orders have equal priority with each other and take precedence over DO-rated orders and unrated orders. (For resolution of conflicts among rated orders of equal priority, see § 33.34(c).)
( 3 ) In addition, a Directive regarding priority treatment for a given item issued by the resource agency with priorities jurisdiction for that item takes precedence over any DX-rated order, DO-rated order, or unrated order, as stipulated in the Directive. (For a full discussion of Directives, see § 33.62.)
( b ) *Program identification symbols.* Program identification symbols indicate which approved program is being supported by a rated order. DOT will use the letter “T” followed by a number for all transportation-related approved programs. Programs may be approved under the procedures of Executive Order 13603 at any time. Program identification symbols, in themselves, do not connote any priority.
( c ) *Priority ratings.* A priority rating consists of the rating symbol—DO and DX—and the program identification symbol, such as DO-T1 or DX-T1 for a priority rating under TPAS.
H. Res. 187

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 11, 2001.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT:

Mr. Hulshof of Missouri.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary Consolidated Statements
of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,606
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                12,497
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     22,582
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          73,232
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            72,645
<LOANS>                                        334,837
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (4,819)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 483,791
<DEPOSITS>                                     428,373
<SHORT-TERM>                                    20,324
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,454
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,255
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,355
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 483,791
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,541
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,288
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    54
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,883
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,518
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,757
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,126
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,358
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,860
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,352
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,352
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.80
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,395
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,729
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    (225)
<RECOVERIES>                                        15
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,819
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
Editorial Note on Part 389
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 389 appear at 66 FR 49873, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 389.3 Definitions. *Act* means statutes granting the Secretary authority to regulate motor carrier safety or commercial activity.
*Administrator* means the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administrator.
*Confidential business information* means trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged or confidential, as described in 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4). Commercial or financial information is considered confidential if it was voluntarily submitted and is the type of information that is customarily not released to the general public by the person or entity from whom it was obtained.
*Major rule* means— ( 1 ) Any rule that the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management and Budget finds has resulted in or is likely to result in: ( i ) An annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more;
( ii ) A major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, geographic regions, or Federal, State, or local government agencies; or
( iii ) Significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and export markets.
( 2 ) The term does not include any rule promulgated under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the amendments made by that Act.
*Petition* means a request for: ( 1 ) A new regulation; ( i ) A regulatory interpretation or clarification; or
( ii ) A determination made by the Administrator that a regulation should be modified or eliminated because it is: ( A ) No longer: ( 1 ) Consistent and clear;
( 2 ) Current with the operational realities of the motor carrier industry; or
( 3 ) Uniformly enforced;
( B ) Ineffective; or
( C ) Overly burdensome.
*Written or in writing* means printed, handwritten, typewritten either on paper or other tangible medium, or by any method of electronic documentation such as electronic mail.
[62 FR 37152, July 11, 1997, as amended at 80 FR 32864, June 10, 2015; 85 FR 86848, Dec. 31, 2020; 88 FR 80183, Nov. 17, 2023]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 8, 1995 (112), Para 112.11 Motion to Instruct Conferees--H.R. 1977]
[Page 1321]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.112.11  motion to instruct conferees--h.r. 1977

  Mr. YATES moved that the managers on the part of the House at the 
conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on H.R. 1977, be 
instructed to disagree to the amendment of the Senate numbered 158.
  After debate,
  By unanimous consent, the previous question was ordered on the motion 
to instruct the managers on the part of the House.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House agree to said motion?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, announced that the 
yeas had it.
  So the motion to instruct the managers on the part of the House was 
agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said motion was agreed to was, 
by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
```
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.711 Administrative review. ( a ) A non-North America-domiciled motor carrier may request FMCSA to conduct an administrative review if it believes FMCSA has committed an error in assigning a safety rating or suspending or revoking the carrier's new entrant registration under this subpart.
( b ) The carrier must submit its request in writing, in English, to FMCSA, ATTN: § 385.113 Request for Administrative Review, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington DC 20590.
( c ) The carrier's request must explain the error it believes FMCSA committed in assigning the safety rating or suspending or revoking the carrier's new entrant registration and include any information or documents that support its argument.
( d ) FMCSA will complete its administrative review no later than 10 days after the carrier submits its request for review. FMCSA's decision will constitute the final Agency action.
[73 FR 76494, Dec. 16, 2008, as amended at 86 FR 57070, Oct. 14, 2021]
Editorial Note on Part 381
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 381 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 381.405 Who determines whether a pilot program should be initiated? ( a ) Generally, pilot programs are initiated by the FMCSA when the agency determines that there may be an effective alternative to one or more of the requirements in the FMCSRs, but does not have sufficient research data to support the development of a notice of proposed rulemaking to change the regulation.
( b ) You may request the FMCSA to initiate a pilot program. However, the decision of whether to propose a pilot program will be made at the discretion of the FMCSA. The FMCSA is not required to publish a notice in the Federal Register requesting public comment on your ideas or suggestions for pilot programs.
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0594 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: john wallace dornheim 

Address: 

2801 tanager drive 

mesquite, TX, 75181 

Email: john.dornheim@hcahealthcare.com 

Phone: 872-701-3607 

Organization: NAMI Texas 

General Comment 

On behalf of NAMI Texas I am writing to submit comments on the Interim Final Rules under the 

Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 and in 

doing so NAMI Texas, as a state organization of the National Alliance on Mental Illness, endorses 

the separate comments submitted by the Parity Implementation Coalition and the National 

Alliance on Mental Illness. 

I emplore you to follow these guidelines during implementation -- this law will help millions of 

Americans receive the quality mental health care they so richly deserve. Please do not dilute the 

impact of this legislation, thereby allowing insurance companies once again to side-step a law 

that is not enforceable. This is one of the most important pieces of legislation ever written for the 

health and well-being of the people of the United States. 

John Dornheim 

Board President, NAMI Texas 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: April 29, 2010 

Received: April 29, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ae3ad1 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 4/29/2010
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0854.html[7/21/2015 4:45:07 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-c78k

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0854

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

Address:

9078 Ellingham Street

San Diego, CA, 92129

Email: christopher_wa@yahoo.com

Phone: 8584848144

General Comment

Obama - enough communist control. Please retire immediately to Colorado and spend your remaining days

 playing golf while smoking weed. You are too weak and give your power to the Harvard elite who wish to

 destroy middle income families and create continuous DemocRAT dependency. 

Leave my 401k alone.
§ 383.23 Commercial driver's license. ( a ) *General rule.* ( 1 ) No person shall operate a CMV unless such person has taken and passed knowledge and driving skills tests for a CLP or CDL that meet the Federal standards contained in subparts F, G, and H of this part for the CMV that person operates or expects to operate.
( 2 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may legally operate a CMV unless such person possesses a CDL which meets the standards contained in subpart J of this part, issued by his/her State or jurisdiction of domicile.
( b ) *Exception.* ( 1 ) If a CMV operator is not domiciled in a foreign jurisdiction that the Administrator has determined tests drivers and issues CDLs in accordance with, or under standards similar to, the standards contained in subparts F, G, and H of this part,[1] the person may obtain a Non-domiciled CLP or Non-domiciled CDL from a State that does comply with the testing and licensing standards contained in such subparts F, G, and H of this part, so long as that person meets the requirements of § 383.71(f).
( 2 ) If an individual is domiciled in a State while that State is prohibited from issuing CDLs in accordance with § 384.405 of this subchapter, that individual is eligible to obtain a Non-domiciled CLP or Non-domiciled CDL from any State that elects to issue a Non-domiciled CDL and which complies with the testing and licensing standards contained in subparts F, G, and H of this part, so long as that person meets the requirements of § 383.71(f).
( 3 ) If an individual possesses a CLP, as defined in § 383.5, the individual is authorized to operate a class of CMV as provided by the CLP in accordance with § 383.25.
[76 FR 26878, May 9, 2011, as amended at 83 FR 22875, May 17, 2018; 83 FR 48975, Sept. 28, 2018] Footnotes -
383.23
[1] Effective December 29, 1988, the Administrator determined that commercial driver's licenses issued by Canadian Provinces and Territories in conformity with the Canadian National Safety Code are in accordance with the standards of this part. Effective November 21, 1991, and as amended on January 19, 2017, the Administrator determined that the new Licencias Federales de Conductor issued by the United Mexican States are in accordance with the standards of this part. Therefore, under the single license provision of § 383.21, a driver holding a commercial driver's license issued under the Canadian National Safety Code or a new Licencia Federal de Conductor issued by Mexico is prohibited from obtaining a non-domiciled CDL, or any other type of driver's license, from a State or other jurisdiction in the United States.
1210-AB32-2-1109.html[7/24/2015 5:52:34 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-kb3h

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1603

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Teri Amborn

General Comment

The problem with this proposed "regulation" is that those who make the regulations, laws and other roadblocks

 to individual freedom is that in a Capitalistic society one's financial savings is saving one's TIME.

If a person is productive enough to save money then that person is rationally saving his or her own personal time

 for retirement.

If you want to "solve" a problem, the first place to start is by identifying what the REAL problem is. Productivity

 isn't a problem and neither is thrift.

The problem with those in government is that you don't associate money with individual time and achievement.

 You view money as a static commodity void of ownership...and that is where you go wrong.

The best approach to your "dilemma" would be to allow those who are ready to die, to take a pill and to die on

 their own terms. Also: It would improve life here in the United States if you would mandate that all young

 people on welfare have their tubes tied and stop paying people to be worthless...including mandatory executions

 for murderers and rapists.

Until this country returns to a basic philosophy of reality, reason, rational self-interest and capitalism, the slide

 toward loss of all individual freedom will accelerate unabated.
^.,;p;|ji^.^f^O^^^ ^ DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N """^'•

- ^

- '^^•^'FEDERAL AVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N OC T 1 2 P 1

^ ^i 1 OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . J . Randolp h Babbitt , ADMINISTRATOR , Federal Aviatio n Administration ,

Complainant , V . LIBERT Y JE T MANAGEMEN T CORPORATION ,

Respondent . 

# RECEIVE D HEARIN G DOCKE T

20 1 lEA l 1002 5 Judge : No t

yet assigne d Hearin g Date : No t

ye t assigne d Hearin g Location : No t

yet assigne d 

## jf~^^>^vi S .^Lon-/i^o ^ WITHDRAWA L O FREQUES T FO RHEARIN G COME S NOW , Respondent , Liberty Je t Managemen t

Corporation , b y an dthroug h undersigne dcounsel , pursuan t to 1 4 C.F.R . 13.215 , an dhereb y withdraw s it s reques t for hearin g base do

n asettlemen t

agreemen t

reache dwit

h counse l fo

r Complainant . Respectfull y submitted ,

Dated : Octobe r

3 , 201 1 Ken t S . Jackson , Esq . Jackso n & Wade , L.L.C . 2162 8 Midlan dDriv e Shawnee , K S 6621 8 Tel : 91 3 338-170 0 Fax:91 3 338-175 5CERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E

I hereb y certif

y tha t I hav e thi s dat e serve dvi aFederal Express , postag e prepaid , a n origina l an don e (1 ) cop y o f th e foregoin g Withdrawa l o f Reques t fo r Hearin g addresse d to : Federal Aviatio n Administratio n

60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Wilbu r Wright Buildin g - Roo m201 4 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Tel : 202-267-311 1 Fax : 202-267-504 7 And , further , that

I hav e thi s date serve dvi aFederal Express , postag e prepaid , acop y o f th e foregoin g Withdrawa l o f Reques t fo r Hearin g addresse dto : Zachary M . Bcrman , Esq . Offic e o f th e Regional Counse l FA A Eastern Region , AEA- 7 On e Aviatio n Plaza , Roo m56 1 Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 Tel : 71 8 553-325 8 Fax:71 8 995-569 9 Dated : Octobe r

3 . 201 1 Kent S . Jackson , Esq . Jackso n & Wade , L.L.C . 2162 8 Midlan dDriv e Shawnee , K

S 6621 8 Tel : 91 3 338-170 0 Fax:91 3 338-175 5
# **Inventory and Prototype   Monitoring of   Natural Resources in Selected   National Park System Units   1998-1999**  Table of Contents

----

 The Report

 Acknowledgments

The Inventory and Monitoring       Program

 Inventories of Natural       Resources

 Monitoring and Status of       Natural Resources

 Data Management in the       I&M Program

 The I&M Training       Course

**Please note that you will need the Acrobat Reader to view Figure 1 and Figure 15.  The Acrobat Reader can be downloaded free of charge from the Internet at http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/main.html.**
Edward L.



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 19, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00483

- CV

Rowland MARTIN , Jr.,

Appellant

v.

Edward L. BRAVENEC and 1216 West Ave., Inc.,

Appellee s

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 07644

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Contempt and Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of December, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1178.html[7/22/2015 3:12:14 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-pyk4

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1178

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jane Bernard

General Comment

The Federal Government has no business regulating how citizens spend their retirement or any other funds.

 Cease and desist.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of -- ) 

) 

Allen Wright Enterprises, Inc./Hamp's ) 

Construction, LLC, A Joint Venture ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W9I2P8-08-D-0048 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 60764, 60765, 60766 

60767,60768 

John I. Hulse, IV, Esq. 

Conroy Law Firm 

Metairie, LA 

Thomas J. Warren, Esq. 

Acting Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Judith E. Almerico, Esq. 

Stephan C. Roth, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorneys 

U.S. Army Engineer District, New Orleans 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 13 February 2018 

~WSOM 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 60764, 60765, 60766, 60767, 60768, 

Appeals of Allen Wright Enterprises, Inc./Hamp's Construction, LLC, A Joint Venture, 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREYD. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1510.html[7/23/2015 12:25:44 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-h4pe

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1510

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

Organization: Freedomworks

General Comment

Stop telling us working people what do do with our money and control what the lazy non working freeloaders are

 doing with welfare money! Make them have to work too!