alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 374.313 Equipment. ( a ) *Temperature control.* A carrier shall maintain a reasonable temperature on each bus (except in commuter service).
( b ) *Restrooms.* Each bus (except in commuter service) seating more than 14 passengers (not including the driver) shall have a clean, regularly maintained restroom, free of offensive odor. A bus may be operated without a restroom if it makes reasonable rest stops.
( c ) *Bus servicing.* Each bus shall be kept clean, with all required items in good working order.
Order filed, August 25, 2015

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00501

- CV

____________ RENEE BAYLISS AND AL L OTHER OCCUPANTS , Appellant

V.

CRESCENT CITY APARTM ENTS , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1062489



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due July 31, 2015

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record.
The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Gina Oliver , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0664.html[7/21/2015 8:20:38 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-jfpg

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0664

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jim Kincl

Address:

303 Winsor Ct

1006

Brookeland, 75931

Email: jim_kincl@msn.com

Phone: 4096989112

General Comment

Please let me be heard, Tell the Department of Labor that "Im smart enough to plan for my own retirement!".
#### The Ph. Zang Brewing Company v. Howlett.

Abstbact op Recoed — Coubt Rules.

Court rule No. 16, prescribing the nature and contents of an abstract of the record, is mandatory. Where its requirements are disregarded, the appeal or writ of error will be dismissed.

*Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.*

Mr. G. L. Hudson, for appellant.

Mr. C. P. Butler and Mr. Willard Milligan, for appellee.

Reed, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.'

In this case there is no abstract' of the record whatever, nor was there any attempt to make one. . There is a docu*559ment on file designated on the title page as “Abstract of Record and Assignment of Errors.” On examination it is found to be only an assignment of errors, twenty-one in number, referring to tbe folios of the record where they are supposed to have existence. As an index they might be useful. The object of an abstract can readily be understood, and the character and necessary contents are so fully and clearty stated in rule No. 16 that further explanation is unnecessary. After the title of the cause, “with the date of the filing of all papers in the court below, and a brief statement of the contents of each pleading.” Neither appears. There is nothing to show that any suit was ever commenced or papers filed. The rule also provides “ that it shall set forth fully the points of the pleadings or evidence, and the points relied upon for the reversal of the judgment or decree.”

We learn from the printed argument of counsel for appellant that a suit was brought by appellee against appellant for tbe price of a car load of bailey, and a judgment obtained for $476.91, and an appeal taken to this court; but those facts do not appear in what is entitled an “ abstract.” The rule is mandatory and will be enforced. The press of business in this court is so great that it has not the time to perform the duties imposed by the rule on counsel, even if it were so inclined.

Very frequently, when we find imperfect abstracts, but where counsel have made an honest attempt to comply witli the rule, we have overlooked the irregularity and gone to the record for necessary information, but when tire rule is entirely ignored and disregarded, we shall enforce rule 19 and dismiss the case. Upon the title pages the parties are styled “ appellant ” and “ appellee.” Immediately following is “ Error to the District Court,” etc. Whether an appeal or writ of error I have not learned, and it is unimportant. The case will be dismissed.

*Dismissed.*
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsElastic response of zone axis (001)-oriented PWA 1480 single crystal: The influence of secondary orientationThe influence of secondary orientation on the elastic response of a zone axis (001)-oriented nickel-base single-crystal superalloy, PWA 1480, was investigated under mechanical loading conditions by applying finite element techniques. Elastic stress analyses were performed with a commercially available finite element code. Secondary orientation of the single-crystal superalloy was offset with respect to the global coordinate system in increments from 0 to 90 deg and stresses developed within the single crystal were determined for each loading condition. The results indicated that the stresses were strongly influenced by the angular offset between the secondary crystal orientation and the global coordinate system. The degree of influence was found to vary with the type of loading condition (mechanical, thermal, or combined) imposed on the single-crystal superalloy.Document ID19910012245Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsKalluri, Sreeramesh*(Sverdrup Technology, Inc., Brook Park OH., United States)*Abdul-Aziz, Ali*(Sverdrup Technology, Inc., Brook Park OH., United States)*Mcgaw, Michael A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberE-6057NASA-TM-103782NAS 1.15:103782Meeting InformationMeeting: 1991 Aerospace Atlantic MeetingLocation: Dayton, OHCountry: United StatesStart Date: April 23, 1991End Date: April 26, 1991Sponsors:SAEAccession Number91N21558Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-25266PROJECT: RTOP 553-13-00Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910012245.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 832

To guarantee the right of individuals to receive social security benefits under

title II of the Social Security Act in full with an accurate annual

cost-of-living adjustment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 2001

Mr. JONES of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. TANCREDO) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To guarantee the right of individuals to receive social security benefits under title II of the Social Security Act

in full with an accurate annual cost-of-living adjustment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Guar5 antee Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 832 IH

1 SEC. 2. GUARANTEE OF FULL SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS

2 WITH ACCURATE ANNUAL COST-OF-LIVING

3 ADJUSTMENT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—On a date not later than 90 days

5 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary

6 of the Treasury shall issue a benefit guarantee certificate

7 to each individual who is determined by the Commissioner

8 of Social Security as of such date to be entitled to benefits

9 under title II of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401

10 et seq.). The Secretary shall also issue such a certificate

11 to any individual on the date such individual is determined

12 thereafter to be entitled to benefits under such title.

13 (b) BENEFIT GUARANTEE CERTIFICATE.—The ben14 efit guarantee certificate issued pursuant to subsection (a)

15 shall represent a legally enforceable guarantee—

16 (1) of the monthly amount of benefits to which

17 the individual is entitled under title II of the Social

18 Security Act (as in effect on the date of the issuance

19 of the certificate); and

20 (2) that the benefits will be adjusted—

21 (A) not less frequently than annually on

22 the basis of an accurate determination of the

23 increase in the cost-of-living of the individual;

24 and
3

•HR 832 IH

1 (B) in accordance with such title (as so in

2 effect), to reflect any future changes in the eli3 gibility status of the individual under such title.

4 (c) ENTITLEMENT.—Any certificate issued under the

5 authority of this section constitutes budget authority in

6 advance of appropriations Acts and represents the obliga7 tion of the Federal Government to provide for the payment

8 to the individual to whom the certificate is issued benefits

9 under title II of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401

10 et seq.) in the amounts set forth in the certificate and

11 adjusted thereafter as described in subsection (b)(2).

Æ
§ 33.62 Directives. ( a ) A Directive is an official action that requires a person to take or refrain from taking certain actions in accordance with its provisions.
( b ) A person must comply with each Directive issued. However, a person may not use or extend a Directive to obtain any items from a supplier, unless expressly authorized to do so in the Directive.
( c ) A Priorities Directive takes precedence over all DX-rated orders, DO-rated orders, and unrated orders previously or subsequently received, unless a contrary instruction appears in the Directive.
( d ) An Allocations Directive takes precedence over all Priorities Directives, DX-rated orders, DO-rated orders, and unrated orders previously or subsequently received, unless a contrary instruction appears in the Directive.
###### Editorial Note on Part 391

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 391 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 391.69 Private motor carrier of passengers (business).

The provisions of § 391.21 (relating to applications for employment), § 391.23 (relating to investigations and inquiries), and § 391.31 (relating to road tests) do not apply to a driver who was a single-employer driver (as defined in § 390.5 of this subchapter) of a private motor carrier of passengers (business) as of July 1, 1994, so long as the driver continues to be a single-employer driver of that motor carrier.

[63 FR 33278, June 18, 1998]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 22 (Friday, February 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 5097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-468]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property 
at Monroe Regional Airport, Monroe, LA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the 
release of land at Monroe Regional Airport under the provisions of 
Title 49, U.S.C. 47153(c).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 5, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to 
the FAA at the following address: Mr. Joseph G. Washington, Manager, 
Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, Airports Division, 
Louisiana/New Mexico Airports Development Office, ASW-640, Fort Worth, 
Texas 76193-0640.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Mayor James E. Mayo at the following address: 
Office of the Mayor, P.O. Box 123, Monroe, LA 71210.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph G. Washington, Manager, Federal 
Aviation Administration, Louisiana/New Mexico Airports Development 
Office, ASW-640, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76193-0640.
    The request to release property may be reviewed in person at this 
same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the 
request to release property at the Monroe Regional Airport.
    On January 24, 2007, the FAA determined that the request to release 
property at Monroe Regional Airport submitted by the City of Monroe met 
the procedural requirements of the Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 
155. The FAA may approve the request, in whole or in part, no later 
than March 5, 2007.
    The following is a brief overview of the request:

    The City of Monroe, Louisiana requests the release of 7.588 
acres of airport property. The release of property will allow for 
construction of a new 80,000 square foot warehouse facility and rail 
access for Allied Building Stores, Inc. to proceed. The sale is 
estimated to provide $91,000.00 whereas the proceeds will go to 
continue the Bermuda Release Program (turf improvement on the 
airfield) and expansion of the security camera system in the 
terminal building and on the airfield.

    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application, 
notice and other documents germane to the application in person at the 
Monroe Regional Airport, Monroe, Louisiana.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 26, 2007.
Kelvin L. Solco,
Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 07-468 Filed 2-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000707853
<NAME>                        RANCON REALTY FUND III
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               1,165
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            1
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1,166
<PP&E>                                               5,072
<DEPRECIATION>                                         592
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       5,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   37
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                           5,627
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         5,664
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       761
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       568
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      51
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        142
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    142
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        117
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           259
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         6.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         6.77
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin
L. Cornwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




  /s/ Kevin L. Cornwell
-----------------------
Kevin L. Cornwell
Chief Executive Officer
May 10, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 282

Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 8, 2001

Mr. FROST submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That Mr. Lynch of Massachusetts shall

2 rank after Mr. Shows of Mississippi on the Committee on

3 Veterans’ Affairs.

Æ
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF **

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER **

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1. | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31,                2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for                the period ending March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                Benda Pharmaceutical, Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                June 26, 2008                                 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |
| */s/                Yiqing Wan*                                    |   |
| Yiqing                WanPresident,                CEO andDirector |

----
§ 350.229 What specific costs are eligible for reimbursement under MCSAP? ( a ) *General.* FMCSA must establish criteria for activities eligible for reimbursement and make those criteria available to the States in the MCSAP application announcement before the MCSAP application period.
( b ) *Costs eligible for reimbursement.* All costs relating to activities eligible for reimbursement must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and allowable under this subpart and 2 CFR parts 200 and 1201. The eligibility of specific costs for reimbursement is addressed in the MCSAP application announcement and is subject to review and approval by FMCSA.
( c ) *Ineligible costs.* MCSAP funds may not be used for the: ( 1 ) Acquisition of real property or buildings; or
( 2 ) Development, implementation, or maintenance of a State registry of medical examiners.
Merrimack,

June, 1895.

#### Abbot *v.*Kimball.

Under Laws 1895, c. 93, an officer may attach “ all the shares ” of a non-resident stockholder in a corporation within this state, by leaving an attested copy of the writ and of his return thereon with a director of the corporation.

Assumpsit. Facts found by the court. The defendant appeared specially and moved that the action be dismissed, because he was not an inhabitant of the state, no personal service had been made upon him within the state, and there had been no actual attachment of his property. The sheriff’ ’s return is as follows: “Merrimack, ss., July 14, 1894. I attached all the shares in the capital stock of the Boston & Maine Railroad owned by the within named Moses Kimball by giving in hand to A. W. Sulloway, one of the directors of said corporation, an attested copy of this writ, with an attested copy of this my return thereon at 10.10 of the clock in the forenoon of said day. Benjamin Tucker, Deputy Sheriff’. And the principal defendant being out of the state, I made no further service of this writ. Benjamin Tucker, Deputy Sheriff’.”

*Samuel C. Eastman*and *William L. Foster,*for the plaintiff.

*George B. French*and *Charles H. Burns,*for the defendant.

Blodgett, J.

“ An officer’s return of an attachment of the share or interest of any person in a corporation may be as general as a return of an attachment of all the defendant’s real estate in a town, and the attachment may be made by the officer by leaving an attested copy of the writ and of his return thereon with a director of the corporation. Any director so served shall forthwith notify the clerk, treasurer, or cashier of such corporation of such attachment.” Laws 1895, *e.*93, *s.*1.

Giving to this declaratory statute (which is entitled “ An act to remove doubts in the construction of section 13, chapter 200 [220] of the Public Statutes, relating to the service of process”) the weight to which it is entitled, we are of opinion that the defendant’s motion to dismiss must be

*Denied.*

Wallace, J., did not sit: the others concurred.