alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N. Y. COMMON PLEAS.

#### In the Matter of the Petition of the Trustees of the Presbytery of New York to Vacate an Assessment.

*Jurisdiction in assessment eases—Special pi'oeeedings.*

The court of common pleas for the city and county of Mew York has jurisdiction,, equally with the supreme court, of proceedings by petition , under chapter 838, Laws of 1858, to vacate local assessments in the city of Mew York, for fraud or substantial error.

The application, when made to the court at special term, is a special proceeding.

*Special*Term, July, 1877.

This proceeding was brought to vacate an assessment for regulating and grading Ninth avenue, between One Hundred and Twenty-third and One Hundred and Twenty-sixth streets, in the city of New York. 'Various errors in the proceedings relative to the assessments were alleged in the petition. Upon the presentation of the petition and notice to the counsel to the corporation, motion was made for an order to take proofs. The corporation counsel objected that this court had not jurisdiction in proceedings under the act of 1858, as amended.

*James A.*Deering, for petitioner,

cited chapter 338, Laws 1858; chapter 379, Laws 1860; chapter 586, Laws 1867; chapter 853, Laws 1868 *(sec.*8); chapter 239, Laws 1873; *In re Frederick D. Tappan (MS. opinion court of appeals)*; *Astor*agt. *The Mayor*(37 *Supr. Ct. Rep.,*586).

*227
      *William C.*Whitney, counsel to the corporation,

cited chapter 338, Laws 1858; chapter 312, Laws 1874; *In the Matter of Dodd*(27 *N. Y.,*629).

Van Hoesen, J.

When the petition was presented to the special term of the common pleas, the counsel of the corporation appeared for the purpose of objecting to the jurisdiction of the court. The substance of his objection is, that the act of 1858, under which the proceeding is taken, provides that the petition shall be presented to a justice of the supreme court. The counsel conceded that if the application to vacate an assessment were what the Code styles a special proceeding, the court of common pleas would, by virtue of the act of 1873, have jurisdiction. The court of appeals, *In the Matter of Dodd*(27 *N. Y.,*629), decided that such an application would not be a special proceeding when made to a judge of the supreme court out of court. In the subsequent case, entitled *“In the Matter of Frederick D. Tappan,"*the manuscript opinion which has been handed to me by the counsel for the petitioner, the court of appeals held that when the application is made to the court at special term, the proceeding certainly is a special proceeding. I feel bound to follow the last-mentioned decision as it is the latest utterance of the court. I. must, therefore, hold this application to be a special proceeding, and of special proceedings this court unquestionably has jurisdiction.

Let an order be entered appointing Rufus F. Andrews, Esq., referee, to hear the proofs and allegations of the parties respecting the matters mentioned in the petition.

Motion granted.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 15

Supporting the national motto of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. SHOWS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Supporting the national motto of the United States.

Whereas the national motto of the United States is ‘‘In God

we trust’’;

Whereas the national motto was adopted in 1956 and is codified in the laws of the United States at section 302 of

title 36, United States Code;

Whereas the national motto reflects the traditional sentiment

that we are a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Being;

Whereas the sentiment ‘‘In God we trust’’ is deeply interwoven into the fabric of our civil polity;

Whereas the content of the motto is as old as the Republic

itself and has always been as integral a part of the first

amendment as the very words of that charter of religious

liberty;
2

•HRES 15 IH

Whereas the Founding Fathers believed devotedly that there

was a God and that the unalienable rights of man were

rooted in Him, a belief clearly evidenced in their writings,

from the Mayflower Compact to the Constitution itself;

Whereas our national life reflects a religious people who earnestly pray that the Supreme Lawgiver guide them in

every measure which may be worthy of His blessing;

Whereas the national motto serves the secular purpose of expressing confidence in the future and encouraging the

recognition of what is worthy of appreciation in society;

Whereas the national motto appears on all coins and currency

issued by the United States Government; and

Whereas the words ‘‘In God We Trust’’ appear over the entrance to the Chamber of the Senate and are prominently

engraved in the wall above the Speaker’s dais in the

Chamber of the House of Representatives: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) finds repugnant all misinterpretations and

3 misapplications of the Constitution that disregard

4 those references to God that are well within the

5 American tradition and outside constitutional pro6 scription;

7 (2) finds that acknowledgment of our need for

8 the superintending care of the Supreme Being does

9 not intrude upon the freedom of conscience;
3

•HRES 15 IH

1 (3) rejects the notion that the laws and Con2 stitution of this Nation require the exclusion of God

3 from matters of government and public life;

4 (4) supports and encourages the public display

5 of the national motto in all public buildings, public

6 schools, and other government institutions estab7 lished or maintained at taxpayer expense; and

8 (5) affirms its support for the national motto.

Æ
§ 222.25 How does this rule affect private highway-rail grade crossings? This rule does not require the routine sounding of locomotive horns at private highway-rail grade crossings. However, where State law requires the sounding of a locomotive horn at private highway-rail grade crossings, the locomotive horn shall be sounded in accordance with § 222.21 of this part. Where State law requires the sounding of a locomotive audible warning device other than the locomotive horn at private highway-rail grade crossings, that locomotive audible warning device shall be sounded in accordance with §§ 222.21(b) and (d) of this part. ( a ) Private highway-rail grade crossings located within the boundaries of a quiet zone must be included in the quiet zone.
( b ) ( 1 ) Private highway-rail grade crossings that are located in New Quiet Zones or New Partial Quiet Zones and allow access to the public, or which provide access to active industrial or commercial sites, must be evaluated by a diagnostic team and equipped or treated in accordance with the recommendations of such diagnostic team.
( 2 ) The public authority shall provide the State agency responsible for grade crossing safety and all affected railroads an opportunity to participate in the diagnostic team review of private highway-rail grade crossings.
( c ) ( 1 ) At a minimum, each approach to every private highway-rail grade crossing within a New Quiet Zone or New Partial Quiet Zone shall be marked by a crossbuck and a “STOP” sign, which are compliant with MUTCD standards unless otherwise prescribed by State law, and shall be equipped with advance warning signs in compliance with § 222.35(c) of this part.
( 2 ) At a minimum, each approach to every private highway-rail grade crossing within a Pre-Rule Quiet Zone or Pre-Rule Partial Quiet Zone shall, by June 24, 2008, be marked by a crossbuck and a “STOP” sign, which are compliant with MUTCD standards unless otherwise prescribed by State law, and shall be equipped with advance warning signs in compliance with § 222.35(c) of this part.
ACCEPTED 12-15-00030-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 3/20/2015 4:20:06 PM CATHY LUSK CLERK
IV

House Calendar No. 57

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 204

[Report No. 107–149]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 2216) making supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year

ending September 30, 2001, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 19, 2001

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 2216) making supplemental

appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30,

2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 2216) making supplemental appro4 priations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001,

5 and for other purposes. All points of order against the con-
2

HRES 204 RH

1 ference report and against its consideration are waived.

2 The conference report shall be considered as read.

House Calendar No. 57

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 204

[Report No. 107–149]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2216) making

supplemental appropriations for the fiscal yearending September 30, 2001, and for other purposes.

JULY 19, 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
**Exhibit 23-1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-57640, 333-84446 and 333-108546), on Form S-4 (No.333-122704), and on Form S-8 (No. 333-61390 and 333-49780) of Exelon Corporation and Subsidiary Companies of our report dated February 22, 2005 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

Chicago, Illinois

February 22, 2005
1210-AB32-2-1084.html[7/24/2015 5:34:38 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-l6fi

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1578

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: T. Rice

General Comment

I do not need the Federal Government's (forced) assistance in planning for my retirement. I vehemently reject the

 EBSA Proposed Rule.

Further, I resent the current administration's repeated, and constant over-reaching and attempts to control the

 American public's private affairs.
EXHIBIT 10.26

                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                                SERVICE 1ST BANK
                          SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT
                            DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2003
                                       FOR
                                 PATRICK CARMAN


         THIS AMENDMENT is adopted this 8th day of August, 2005, by and between
SERVICE 1ST BANK, a state-chartered commercial bank located in Stockton,
California (the "Company") and PATRICK CARMAN (the "Executive").

         The Company and the Executive executed the Salary Continuation
Agreement on September 10, 2003 (the "Agreement") and the First Amendment to the
Salary Continuation Agreement on August 8, 2005.

         The undersigned hereby amends, in part, said Agreement for the purpose
of changing the Normal Retirement Age. Therefore, the following change shall be
made:

         Article 1.13 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and
         replaced by Article 1.13 below.

1.13     "Normal Retirement Age" means the Executive's sixty-fifth (65th)
         birthday.

         The Schedule A attached to the Agreement shall also be amended in its
entirety and replaced with the new Schedule A attached to this Amendment.

         IN WITNESS OF THE ABOVE, the Executive and the Company hereby consent
to this Second Amendment.


Executive:                                  SERVICE 1ST BANK

/s/ PATRICK CARMAN                          By     /s/ JOHN O. BROOKS
----------------------------------                 -----------------------------
Patrick Carman                                     John O. Brooks

                                            Title  Chairman
                                                   -----------------------------


                                      102
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1037.html[7/22/2015 6:56:09 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-xmak

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1037

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Roy Whipple

General Comment

It has come to my attention that officials in the Federal government are considering regulations concerning my

 retirement monies. These clowns are over 18 trillion in debt and now they want to tell me what to do with my

 money? Bad idea!
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandra M. Peay, Contact Representative or Renee Hallman, Contact Representative, Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room H-303, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3100.

By Direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 07-4619 Filed 9-18-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-02-M
1210-AB32-2-1321.html[7/26/2015 1:35:59 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvw-viux

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1816

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Lorne Leitman

General Comment

Stop trying to regulate my retirement money! I'm smart enough to handle my own money, my own 401k and my

 own retirement. You seem to think everyone is incompetent except you, and that's just not right. I've worked

 hard to find and save my retirement. How dare you butt in with your "regulations" about how I can use MY

 money. Isn't it enough that you already tax it to death upon withdrawal? Leave my money alone! Get your

 greedy government money-grubbing fingers out of my pockets and your eyes out of my life! I don't need or

 want your oversight on how I spend my money.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 132

Recognizing the historical significance of the sacrifices made by the Irish

Republican hunger strikers of 1981 and the subsequent political impact

their actions had on the Northern Ireland peace process.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 4 (legislative day, MAY 3), 2001

Mr. CAPUANO (for himself, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr.

BORSKI, Mr. KING, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. PALLONE, Mr.

CROWLEY, and Mr. GILMAN) submitted the following resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the historical significance of the sacrifices made

by the Irish Republican hunger strikers of 1981 and

the subsequent political impact their actions had on the

Northern Ireland peace process.

Whereas in a hunger strike in 1981, Irish Republicans Bobby

Sands, Francis Hughes, Ray McCreesh, Patsy O’Hara,

Joe McDonnell, Martin Hurson, Kevin Lynch, Kieran

Doherty, Thomas McElwee, and Michael Devine sacrificed their lives to bring world attention to the plight

of Irish Republicans in the H-Block in Long Kesh Prison

in Northern Ireland;

Whereas the hunger strikers were protesting the conditions of

the British prison system in which they were being held
2

•HRES 132 IH

and the loss by Irish Republican prisoners of the right

to political status;

Whereas Irish Republican prisoners were subjected to repeated beatings, interrogation, sleep deprivation, and

other forms of torture, without being convicted of any

crime in a jury trial;

Whereas Irish Republican female prisoners being held in

Armagh in Northern Ireland were not allowed to hunger

strike, but were equally committed to the Republican

cause;

Whereas the hunger strikers brought world attention to the

political landscape of the Northern Ireland struggle; and

Whereas in April 1981 before dying, the leader of the hunger

strikers, Bobby Sands, was elected to the United Kingdom Parliament: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the historical significance of the sacrifices made by

3 the Irish Republican hunger strikers of 1981 and the sub4 sequent political impact their actions had on the Northern

5 Ireland peace process.

Æ
exv10w13



 





Exhibit 10.13




SUPERIOR CONSULTANT HOLDINGS CORPORATION




Amendment to Employment Agreement



The current Employment
Agreement, as amended, between RICHARD P. SASLOW, (“the employee”) and Superior Consultant Company, Inc., a
Michigan Corporation, (“the company”), is hereby amended as
follows:





	1.	 	The section entitled “Salary” is deleted in its entirety and
replaced by the following:
	 
	 	 	“Salary” The bi-weekly salary will be $6394.2322 (prorated for
partial periods), subject to any payroll or other deductions as
may be required to be made pursuant to law, government order, or
by written agreement with or consent of the employee.
	 
	2.	 	This amendment is effective on 10/13/2002. There is no
fixed or minimum term to this Amendment. Terms of the current
Employment Agreement as previously amended, will prevail until
the effective date of this Amendment.
	 
	3.	 	Except as amended herein, all terms and provisions of
the current Employment Agreement, as previously amended,
remain in full force and effect.




	 	 	 
	Name

	 	SASLOW, RICHARD
	Title

	 	Corporate VP & General Counsel







Accepted By SASLOW, RICHARD on 10/17/20024 10:34 PM
1210-AB32-2-1174.html[7/24/2015 7:17:37 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvr-rzz4

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1668

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I deserve my Constitutional right to make my own decisions regarding my life. This includes any decisions

 pertaining to the funding of my retirement or how long I choose to work. I appreciate being heard. Thank you.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEVIN BAUER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 475 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of December, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
EXHIBIT 32

TAMIR BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

UNITED STATES CODE)



Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Tamir Biotechnology, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby
certify, to the best of his knowledge and belief that:



(1) The Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|May 1, 2013             | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|                        | 
|/s/ JAMIE SULLEY        | 
|President               | 
|                        | 
|May 1, 2013             | 
|                        | 
|                        | 
|/s/ JOANNE BARSA        | 
|Chief Financial Officer |
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, November 7, 1995 (141), Para 141.31 Sanctions Against Castro Government]
[Page 1879]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.141.31  sanctions against castro government

  On motion of Mr. GILMAN, by unanimous consent, the bill (H.R. 927) to 
seek international sanctions against the Castro government in Cuba, to 
plan for support of a transition government leading to a democratically 
elected government in Cuba, and for other purposes; together with the 
amendment of the Senate thereto, was taken from the Speaker's table.
  When on motion of Mr. GILMAN, it was,
  Resolved, That the House disagree to the amendment of the Senate and 
agree to the conference asked by the Senate on the disagreeing votes of 
the two Houses thereon.
  Thereupon, the SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, by unanimous consent, 
announced the appointment of Messrs. Gilman, Burton of Indiana, Ms. Ros-
Lehtinen, Messrs. King, Diaz-Balart, Hamilton, Gejdenson, Torricelli, 
and Menendez, as managers on the part of the House at said conference.
  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate thereof.
```