alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 262.5 Allocation requirements.

At least fifty percent of all grant funds awarded under this section out of funds appropriated for a fiscal year shall be provided as grant awards of not more than $20,000,000 each. Designated, high-priority projects will be excluded from this allocation formula. FRA will adjust the $20,000,000 amount to reflect inflation for fiscal years beginning after fiscal year 2006 based on the materials and supplies component from the all-inclusive index of the *AAR Railroad Cost Indexes.*
1210-AB32-2-1489.html[7/26/2015 5:58:19 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwh-p9vi

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1985

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Leonard Pepitone

Address:

8341-104

Raleigh, NC, 27613-1326

Email: agentleonardo@hotmail.com

Phone: 919-632-9750

General Comment

I'm smart enough to plan my own retirement. If the government would stop throwing monkey wrenches into the

 mix we would all be much better off. Obama/SCOTUS Care continues to be the latest fiasco. Unaffordable,

 Unneeded, Unwanted and Unconstitutional. Please, No More Help! Get your hands out of our wallets and get

 off of our backs!!!
1210-AB32-2-1467.html[7/26/2015 5:31:26 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwg-9sj7

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1963

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Florida Bill

General Comment

I can do my own planning! I'm retired and have saved my entire life, I have read and educated myself on

 investing and do not want the government to touch my IRA in any way. In my 73 years old I have watched the

 government grow bigger and bigger, it has turned into a monster with insatiable appetite for power, control and

 money. I'm afraid when I think of our government thoughts of Nazi Germany, Stalin and others comes to mind.

 As I do not trust my government any more Iam reluctant to provide contact information.
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.21 Separation of functions. ( a ) An Agency employee engaged in the performance of investigative, advocacy, or prosecutorial functions in a proceeding under § 385.15, § 385.113, § 385.327, § 385.423, § 385.711, § 385.911(e), § 385.913(e), § 385.1009(d), or § 385.1011(d) may not, in that case or a factually-related case, discuss or communicate the facts or issues involved with, or otherwise advise or assist, the Agency decisionmaker or personnel advising the Agency decisionmaker, except as counsel or a witness in a public proceeding, or if the same facts and information are provided to all the parties involved in the matter. The prohibition in this paragraph (a) also includes the staff of those covered by this section.
( b ) As used in this section, *decisionmaker* means the FMCSA official authorized to issue a final decision in the applicable proceeding listed in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Nothing in this part shall preclude Agency decisionmakers or anyone advising an Agency decision-maker from taking part in a determination to launch an investigation or issue a complaint, or similar preliminary decision.
[86 FR 35642, July 7, 2021]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0918.html[7/21/2015 6:12:10 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-2i4i

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0918

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Wallace Cookson

Address:

3100 Caldera Blvd Apt 221

Midland, TX, 79705

Email: wallacecookson@gmail.com

Phone: 432-488-6834

General Comment

Stop trying to control us. The government was for the people. The government was only meant to control 15

 percent instead of telling we have forced healthcare.
#### § 37.211 Effect of NHTSA and FHWA safety rules.

OTRB operators are not required to take any action under this subpart that would violate an applicable National Highway Traffic Safety Administration or Federal Highway Administration safety rule.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 3, 2014

No. 04

- 14

- 00617

- CV

IN RE Teresita CUTLER

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On September 2, 2014, relator Teresita Cutler filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay pending a ruling on the mandamus petition. The court has considered the petition for writ of ma ndamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay are

DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on September 3 rd , 2014.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3 rd day of September, 2014

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013

- CI

- 00007, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Teresita Cutler and Ernest Eugene Cutl er Jr. , pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Richard Price presiding.
::::?SKyKINB 

U.S. Dq^artment of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 ,-:; • ^ •. - ^_ 

West Building ground floor — •'Z}"-^^-rrj 

Room W12-140 -^ ^(^S ^ 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE j> il^ ^± i 

Washington, DC 20590 J.^ e5Q?7? 

RE". Docket Number FAA-2007-0071 "^ 

November?, 2011 

Dear Sirs; 

Sky King seeks to extend its exemption number 9547A, from 14 CFR I21,434©(l)(ii) which is 

set to expire on November 30, 2011. 

There have been no changes since the original exemption request was submitted. Sky King has 

effectively utilized this exemption in the public interest. 

We respectfully request that this exemption be extended. 

Thank you, 

Ronald L 

McKelvey 

Ronald L. McKelvey 

Assistant Director of Operations 

DN <^US, rt^CA. l=Elkgrpv*. o^SIfy King, 

oj=S)iy <jiig, 

092342 192OO30O.1OC 1 1'l]299. 

cn=Bor«ld t McKelwy. 

erTiJiNrmcke^ey«'nyik>kjrig ne[ 

Dji'c-jan 11.07 1216.31-0600' 

Sky King, Inc., • 910 Florin Road, Suite 200 • Sacramento, CA 95831 • (916) 382-4610 • Fax (916) 382-4622 

1
§ 375.703 What is the maximum collect-on-delivery amount I may demand at the time of delivery? ( a ) On a binding estimate, the maximum amount is the exact estimate of the charges, plus charges for any additional services requested by the shipper after the bill of lading has been issued and charges, if applicable, for impracticable operations as defined in your carrier tariff. The maximum amount of charges for impracticable operations you may collect on delivery is an amount equal to 15 percent of all other charges due at delivery.
( b ) On a non-binding estimate, the maximum amount is 110 percent of the non-binding estimate of the charges, plus charges for any additional services requested by the shipper after the bill of lading has been issued and charges, if applicable, for impracticable operations as defined in your carrier tariff. The maximum amount of charges for impracticable operations you may collect on delivery is an amount equal to 15 percent of all other charges due at delivery.
[72 FR 36774, July 5, 2007]
CERTIFICATIONS

                                  Exhibit 32.1

I, Steven V. Lant, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of CH Energy Group, Inc. and Central Hudson
      Gas & Electric Corporation (the "Companies") for the period ended December
      31, 2005 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and

2.    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Companies.

Date: February 17, 2006

                                             /s/ Steven V. Lant
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                                               Steven V. Lant
                                    Chairman of the Board, President and
                              Chief Executive Officer of CH Energy Group, Inc.

                                             /s/ Steven V. Lant
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                                               Steven V. Lant
                              Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
                                of Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation

                                     - 171 -
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0209 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Bernadette McHugh 

Address: 

Email: 

Phone: 

General Comment 

The current regulations uder the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health 

Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 do not assure parity for mental health 

coverage. 

I have met people with personal experience being treated with EEG biofeedback or 

neurofeedback to help with ADD and depression. But these services were not 

covered by their health insurer, nor mine, even though there is research showing 

that neurofeedback is effective. 

After very limited or no success with standard medications prescribed I very 

much wish to try neurofeedback. I am unable to afford these sessions myself. I 

believe the treatment could be very helpful, as it has been for those I know who 

have had the treatment and swear by it's effectiveness.

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 28, 2009 

Received: May 27, 2009 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 809b9ba0 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web
Because there is good research to show that neurofeedback works, and because I 

have seen for myself that it helped others when other treatments failed, I 

believe it should be a covered service. There is more research showing that 

neurofeedback is effective than many medical and surgical services that are 

routinely covered by my insurer. That is not fair. It is not parity. 

I strongly urge that you write and enforce regulations that require health 

insurers to use the same scientific review criteria for mental health services 

such as neurofeedback that they use for most medical procedures. If they do so, 

then I am confident neurofeedback will be covered and this safe and effective 

treatment will be available to the very large number of people in our country 

for whom more tradtitional treatment approaches were not enough.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0711.html[7/21/2015 10:00:33 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-p9xs

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0711

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Pamela Ihle

General Comment

I do not want the government messing with my retirement. I want to plan for my own retirement. Please do not

 touch!
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# SUMMARY:

The National Park Service (NPR) announces the availability of the ROD on the FGMP/EIS for Castillo de San Marcos National Monument, Florida.

                        On June 11, 2007, the Regional Director, NPS, Southeast Region, approved the ROD for the project. As soon as practicable, the NPS will begin to implement the FGMP/EIS, described as the Preferred Alternative contained in the FGMP/EIS issued on May 4, 2007. The approved plan will enhance opportunities for visitors to interact with and appreciate the national monument's resources while providing for the preservation and protection of the park's resources when implemented. The approved alternative will enhance the visitor experience by removing some modern intrusions from the Castillo and from the exterior landscapes. The visitor center authorized by Public Law 108-480, pending availability and approval of capital and operational funding,                               ( print page 51658)                            would be constructed off-site and convenient to the park and St. Augustine's Spanish Quarter. The authority for publishing this notice is 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C).                    

# DATES:

The ROD was signed by the Regional Director, NPS, Southeast Region, on June 11, 2007.

# ADDRESSES:

Copies of the ROD are available from the Superintendent, Castillo de San Marcos National Monument, 1 South Castillo Drive, St. Augustine, Florida 32084; telephone: 904-829-6506.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

The Superintendent, Castillo de San Marcos National Monument, at the address and telephone number shown above or David Libman at 404-562-3124, extension 685.

The responsible official for the ROD is Patricia A. Hooks, Regional Director, Southeast Region, National Park Service, 100 Alabama Street, SW., 1924 Building, Atlanta, Georgia 30303.

Dated: August 10, 2007.

Patricia A. Hooks,

Regional Director, Southeast Region.

[FR Doc. 07-4412 Filed 9-7-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312-75-M
#### Matter of Estate of George Nanny, Deceased.

Portions of decree appealed from modified in accordance with opinion. Order to be settled . by Dykman, J. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
1210-AB32-2-1177.html[7/24/2015 7:17:35 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvr-fuua

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1671

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Dana Wheeler

Address: United States, 

Email: spearsdr143@yahoo.com

General Comment

I am more than intelligent enough to make decisions to manage my own retirement . I do not need for the

 Department of Labor to restrict in any way how I use my own money for my retirement. Quite frankly I am tired

 of laws that I do not want such as Obamacare being shoved down my throat. This legislation should not be

 enacted. I will be contacting my Senator and Congressman to make my voice heard to them as well.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 16, 2017.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-2432

Lower Tribunal No. 15-27325

________________

Thomas E. Strinko,

Appellant,

vs.

Sontha S. Strinko,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, George A.

Sarduy, Judge.

Thomas E. Strinko, in proper person.

Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP and Elizabeth S. Baker, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

FERNANDEZ, J.

Thomas Strinko appeals the trial court’s dismissal of Strinko’s petition to

domesticate and modify an Ohio judgment on the basis that Florida does not permit
a Florida court to grant grandparents visitation. We reverse and remand, as the

Ohio order awarding Strinko grandparent’s visitation rights is entitled to

enforcement under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States

Constitution.

Strinko filed a petition seeking domestication of a judgment entered by the

Ohio Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, in Butler County, Ohio. The

judgment granted Strinko supervised visitation with his granddaughter, K.C. 

K.C.’s mother, Sontha Sue Strinko, moved to dismiss the petition on the basis that

grandparent visitation ordered by a foreign court is unenforceable in Florida as a

matter of law. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the petition, and

Strinko now appeals.

Subsequent to the trial court’s decision, the Florida Supreme Court decided

the issue of enforcement of a similar order from a sister state based on the Full

Faith and Credit clause of the United States Constitution. Clearly, the trial court

did not have the benefit of this decision when it entered its order dismissing

Strinko’s petition. In Ledoux-Nottingham v. Downs, 210 So. 3d 1217 (Fla. 2017),

the Florida Supreme Court held that Full Faith and Credit, rather than comity

principles, governs the domestication and enforcement of the judgment of a sister

state entered by a court of competent jurisdiction. The Court further held that

despite Florida’s privacy laws and their effect on grandparent visitation, the

2
properly domesticated judgment of a sister state allowing grandparent visitation is

enforceable in Florida, and a trial court has no discretion but to enforce such a

properly entered and domesticated judgment. Id.

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order dismissing Strinko’s petition

and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

3
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0746.html[7/21/2015 11:31:28 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-trsm

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0746

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Dawn Bryan

Organization: Freedomworks

General Comment

Keep you hands off all retirement money... It is not yours or the governments right to control what has been

 earned and saved through hard honest work.
1210-AB32-2-1327.html[7/26/2015 1:35:58 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvx-1eck

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1823

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: John Hatfield

Address:

P.O. Box 430124

Houston, TX, 77243-0124

Email: jhatfield@hotmail.com

Phone: 281-434-4118

Organization: Freedom Works

General Comment

Stay out of I.R.A.'s. They are off limits.
IV

House Calendar No. 73

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 236

[Report No. 107–204]

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 13 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 11), 2001

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported

from the Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of Thursday, September 13,

6 2001, providing for consideration or disposition of a bill

7 making emergency supplemental appropriations for fiscal
2

HRES 236 RH

1 year 2001 for additional disaster assistance, for anti-ter2 rorism initiatives, for assistance in the recovery from the

3 tragedy that occurred on September 11, 2001, and for

4 other purposes, any amendment thereto, any conference

5 report thereon, or any amendment reported in disagree6 ment from a conference thereon.

House Calendar No. 73

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 236

[Report No. 107–204]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII

with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

SEPTEMBER 13 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 11), 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed