alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 350.215 What response does a State receive to its CVSP? ( a ) *First year of the CVSP.* ( 1 ) FMCSA will notify the Lead State Agency within 30 days after FMCSA begins its review of the State's first year of the CVSP, including the budget, whether FMCSA: ( i ) Approves the CVSP; or
( ii ) Withholds approval because the CVSP: ( A ) Does not meet the requirements of this part; or
( B ) Is not adequate to ensure effective enforcement of compatible (as defined in § 350.105 of this part) laws, regulations, standards, and orders on CMV safety.
( 2 ) If FMCSA withholds approval of the CVSP, FMCSA will give the Lead State Agency a written explanation of the reasons for withholding approval and allow the Lead State Agency to modify and resubmit the CVSP for approval.
( 3 ) The Lead State Agency will have 30 days from the date of the notice under paragraph (a)(2) of this section to modify and resubmit the CVSP.
( 4 ) Failure to resubmit the modified CVSP may delay funding or jeopardize MCSAP eligibility.
( 5 ) Final disapproval of a resubmitted CVSP will result in disqualification for MCSAP funding for that fiscal year.
( b ) *Annual update for the second or third year of the CVSP.* ( 1 ) FMCSA will notify the Lead State Agency within 30 days after FMCSA begins its review of the State's annual update, including the budget, whether FMCSA: ( i ) Approves the annual update; or
( ii ) Withholds approval because the annual update: ( A ) Does not meet the requirements of this part; or
( B ) Is not adequate to ensure effective enforcement of compatible laws, regulations, standards, and orders on CMV safety.
( 2 ) If FMCSA withholds approval of the annual update, FMCSA will give the Lead State Agency a written explanation of the reasons for withholding approval and allow the Lead State Agency to modify and resubmit the annual update for approval.
( 3 ) The Lead State Agency will have 30 days from the date of the notice under paragraph (b)(2) of this section to modify and resubmit the annual update.
( 4 ) Failure to resubmit the modified annual update may delay funding or jeopardize MCSAP eligibility.
( 5 ) Final disapproval of a resubmitted annual update will result in disqualification for MCSAP funding for that fiscal year.
( c ) *Judicial review.* Any State aggrieved by an adverse decision under this section may seek judicial review under 5 U.S.C. chapter 7.
#### The Discount and Deposit Bank of Clarion, *Appellant, v.*Samuel Osterhoudt and another, *Respondents.*

— Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.;

Barker, J., not sitting.
##### 



Exhibit 32.B CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2004,
of El Paso CGP Company (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, D. Mark Leland, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ D. Mark LelandD. Mark LelandExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
August 30, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Paso
CGP Company and will be retained by El Paso CGP Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.173 Who is responsible for paying for the test of a split specimen? ( a ) As the employer, you are responsible for making sure (e.g., by establishing appropriate accounts with laboratories for testing split specimens) that the MRO, first laboratory, and second laboratory perform the functions noted in §§ 40.175-40.185 in a timely manner, once the employee has made a timely request for a test of the split specimen.
( b ) As the employer, you must not condition your compliance with these requirements on the employee's direct payment to the MRO or laboratory or the employee's agreement to reimburse you for the costs of testing. For example, if you ask the employee to pay for some or all of the cost of testing the split specimen, and the employee is unwilling or unable to do so, you must ensure that the test takes place in a timely manner, even though this means that you pay for it.
( c ) As the employer, you may seek payment or reimbursement of all or part of the cost of the split specimen from the employee (e.g., through your written company policy or a collective bargaining agreement). This part takes no position on who ultimately pays the cost of the test, so long as the employer ensures that the testing is conducted as required and the results released appropriately.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1163.html[7/22/2015 3:04:56 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-j8at

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1163

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I have been retired since 2012. What I "earn" - yes, earn in retirement is less than one-third of what I earned as a

 special education teacher. However, I have always been quite frugal, as much as I could being self-supporting,

 and I still am. I don't own a big fancy car or house and this is how I plan on living until God takes me from this

 earth to live with Him. I do not need, nor definitely do not WANT the government telling me how to live or

 what to do with the money that is rightfully mine. The social security I get is not a "gift", it is money that was

 put in my account from what I made while working. To me, it was a way of saving (putting money aside) for

 retirement, that would guarantee a decent amount for me to live on as I grew older. For the government to now

 decide that I don't know how to take care of my money is ridiculous. I also have a Power of Attorney for my

 finances if for some reason I would not be able to make decisions on my own. This Power of Attorney is MUCH

 better qualified to stand in for me if necessary, than anyone in the federal government who does not care about

 me at all and thinks of me only as a number would do.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RegeneRx (the "Company") on Form
10QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.J. Finkelstein,
Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

August 1, 2003                           /s/ J.J. Finkelstein
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Chief Executive and Financial Officer




                                       14
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                              MAMMATECH CORPORATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mammatech Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Henry S.
Pennypacker, President and Chief Executive Officer and Mary Bailey Sellers,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



By:   /s/ Henry S. Pennypacker                          Dated: January 14, 2004
      --------------------------------------------
      Henry S. Pennypacker
      Title: President, Chief Executive Officer

      /s/ Mary Bailey Sellers
      --------------------------------------------
      Mary Bailey Sellers
      Title: Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 183 (Friday, September 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 54056]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4618]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5125-N-38]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

DATES: Effective Date: September 21, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: September 13, 2007.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 07-4618 Filed 9-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-M
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER REQUIRED BY
RULE 13A-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Quality Systems, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: February 1, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Steven PlochockiSteven T. Plochocki,Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Editorial Note on Part 381
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 381 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 381.105 Who is required to comply with the rules in this part? ( a ) You must comply with the rules in this part if you are going to request a waiver or apply for an exemption.
( b ) You should follow the instructions in subpart D of this part if you would like to recommend the agency initiate a pilot program.
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 817 Employed full time (persons who usually work Number in thousands 16 to 19 years 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value** LNU02500012Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Employed, Usually Work Full Time, 16-

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:07:12 PM)
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.275 What is the effect of procedural problems that are not sufficient to cancel an alcohol test? ( a ) As an STT, BAT, employer, or a service agent administering the testing process, you must document any errors in the testing process of which you become aware, even if they are not “fatal flaws” or “correctable flaws” listed in this subpart. Decisions about the ultimate impact of these errors will be determined by administrative or legal proceedings, subject to the limitation of paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) No person concerned with the testing process may declare a test cancelled based on a mistake in the process that does not have a significant adverse effect on the right of the employee to a fair and accurate test. For example, it is inconsistent with this part to cancel a test based on a minor administrative mistake (*e.g.,* the omission of the employee's middle initial) or an error that does not affect employee protections under this part. Nor does the failure of an employee to sign in Step 4 of the ATF result in the cancellation of the test. Nor is a test to be cancelled on the basis of a claim by an employee that he or she was improperly selected for testing.
( c ) As an employer, these errors, even though not sufficient to cancel an alcohol test result, may subject you to enforcement action under DOT agency regulations.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 25, 2015

NO. 03

- 14

- 00265

- CV

Charles N. Draper, Appellant

v.

Greg Guernsey, in his Capacity as Director of Planning and Development Watershed

Protection Review Department; and City of Austin, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON, AND BOURLAN D AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the order signed by the district court on November 13, 2013 . Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in

the district court’s order

. Therefore, we affirm the district court’s order in part, and we must also

reverse in part because it awards relief beyond that properly authorized under subsections (a) or

(e) of Section 101.106 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code as they apply to this case. Each

party shall pay the costs of the appeal incurred by that party, both in this Court and the court

below.
Exhibit 32-6



Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code



The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Report on Form 10-K/A of Commonwealth Edison Company for the year ended
December 31, 2008, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Commonwealth Edison Company.



|                        |  |                                                                                                    
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 18, 2009 |  | /s/    ROBERT K.
MCDONALD                                                                          
|                        |  | Robert K. McDonald Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Chief Risk Officer



72
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0903.html[7/21/2015 6:00:05 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-sreu

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0903

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Ruth Fadely

Address:

4004 Stonebrook

TYLER, TX, 75707

Email: ruth.fadely@gmail.com

Phone: 9035395085

General Comment

America is the land of the free, where we are allowed choices. It is important that it stays that way and that as

 citizens, we are allowed to save for retirement in manner that we feel is appropriate. We are a smart people! We

 are able to make decisions for ourselves and enjoy the benefits and pay the consequences as needed. It is

 important that have the option to save without taxes at this point. It is important that we have an opportunity to

 invest as we see fit.
REGULATORY EVALUA nON

Directorate Identifier: 2008-NM-168-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1531.html[7/23/2015 2:19:25 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-rs7d

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1531

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Tonya Vakser

General Comment

We are smart enough to plan our own retirement! Government needs to please stay out of this!
###### Editorial Note on Part 395

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 395 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 395.12 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.141 How does the MRO obtain information for the verification decision? As the MRO, you must do the following as you make the determinations needed for a verification decision: ( a ) You must conduct a medical interview. You must review the employee's medical history and any other relevant biomedical factors presented to you by the employee. You may direct the employee to undergo further medical evaluation by you or another physician.
( b ) If the employee asserts that the presence of a drug or drug metabolite in his or her specimen results from taking prescription medication (*i.e.,* a legally valid prescription consistent with the Controlled Substances Act), you must review and take all reasonable and necessary steps to verify the authenticity of all medical records the employee provides. ( 1 ) You may contact the employee's physician or other relevant medical personnel for further information. ( i ) If you decide to contact the employee's pharmacy to authenticate whether the prescription offered by the employee was filled by the pharmacy, you or staff under your operational control can contact the pharmacy.
( ii ) If you utilize staff to perform the inquiry in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, you must ensure operational control over the hiring, firing, evaluation of the staff and you must oversee the performance of the function of contacting a pharmacy to authenticate specific prescription(s) (*e.g.,* outline or script what the staff will ask the pharmacy; occasionally monitor calls to assure quality control; or other methods to ensure the staff are properly conducting the calls with the pharmacies).
( 2 ) You may request an HHS-certified laboratory with validated protocols (*see* § 40.81(c)) to conduct testing for D,L stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine or testing for tetrahydrocannabivarin (THC-V) when verifying lab results, as you determine necessary.
[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 82 FR 52245, Nov. 13, 2017; 88 FR 27645, May 2, 2023]