alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTOF 1934**

I,Karen L. Johannes, certify that:

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Paulson Capital Corp.;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         [Reserved.]

(c)          Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d)         Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 14, 2007      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| /s/ Karen L. Johannes   |   |
| Karen L. Johannes       |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| Paulson Capital Corp.   |   |

 

----
Skip to main content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Español
Sign in

## Research, Statistics & Policy Analysis

Social Security AdministrationResearch, Statistics & Policy AnalysisStatistics Archives

- Research & Statistics Home
- Research & Analysis    - International Update
  - Issue Papers
  - ORES Working Papers
  - Policy Briefs
  - Research & Statistics Notes
  - Research Summaries
  - Social Security Bulletin 
- Archives
- Author index
- Extramural projects
- Statistics
-  Current editions    - Annual Statistical Report on the Social Security Disability Insurance Program
  - Annual Statistical Supplement
  - Congressional Statistics
  - DI & SSI Program Participants: Characteristics & Employment
  - Earnings & Employment Data..., by State & County
  - Expenditures of the Aged Chartbook
  - Fast Facts & Figures About Social Security
  - Income of the Aged Chartbook
  - Income of the Population 55 or Older
  - National Beneficiary Survey: Disability Statistics
  - OASDI Beneficiaries by State & County
  - OASDI Beneficiaries by State & ZIP Code
  - SSI Annual Statistical Report
  - SSI Monthly Statistics
  - SSI Recipients by State & County
  - Statistics At a Glance 
-  Archives
- Public-Use Data Files
- Population Profiles    - Child Beneficiaries
  - Child Beneficiary Families
  - Fully Insured Workers
  - Marital Status & Poverty
  - Middle Class Beneficiaries
  - Never Beneficiaries
  - Taxable Maximum Earners
  - Veteran Beneficiaries 
- Program Explainers    - Benefit Claiming Age
  - Government Pension Offset
  - Retirement Earnings Test
  - Scheduled vs. Payable Benefits
  - Special Minimum Benefit
  - Why Will Poverty Decline for Beneficiaries?
  - Windfall Elimination Provision 
- Projections
- Fact sheets    - By beneficiary type
  - By demographic group 
- Tables    - Policy options/proposals
  - Profile of beneficiaries by race & ethnicity
  - Profile of taxpayers by race & ethnicity 

### SSI Monthly Statistics, August 2024

Download entire publication (0.2 MB)

Download all tables (0.1 MB)

#### Table of ContentsAvailable formats

##### All Federally Administered Payments

##### Federal Payments

##### Federally Administered State Supplementation Payments

#### Contact

statistics@ssa.gov

#### Next Expected Update

Subscribe to Updates

Publishing Schedule

Footer menu
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1180.html[7/22/2015 3:12:15 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-qjk2

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1180

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Stacy Cunningham

General Comment

I can and will plan for my own retirement. Quit pitting your hands on my money. I can plan onyour own.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 234 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 182
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 234

                          [Report No. 104-356]

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make nondischargeable a 
debt for death or injury caused by the debtor's operation of watercraft 
                     or aircraft while intoxicated.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Ehlers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                           November 20, 1995

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
  [Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make nondischargeable a 
debt for death or injury caused by the debtor's operation of watercraft 
                     or aircraft while intoxicated.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Boating and Aviation Operation 
Safety Act of <DELETED>1994 </DELETED>1995''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 523(a)(9) of title 11, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``, watercraft, or aircraft'' after ``motor vehicle''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.

    (a) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act 
and the amendment made by section 2 shall take effect on the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by section 2 
shall not apply with respect to cases commenced under title 11 of the 
United States Code before the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                     

                                                 Union Calendar No. 182

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 234

                          [Report No. 104-356]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make nondischargeable a 
debt for death or injury caused by the debtor's operation of watercraft 
                     or aircraft while intoxicated.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 20, 1995

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
      House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: grandolph49@yahoo.com [mailto:grandolph49@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:47 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

george rogers 

820 Tanglewood Dr 

Redding, CA 96003
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 24, 1995 (100), Para 100.34 Subsequent Action on a Reported Bill]
[Page 1186]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.100.34  subsequent action on a reported bill

  Under clause 5 of rule X, the following action was taken by the 
Speaker:

       H.R. 1528. The Committee on Commerce discharged. H.R. 1528 
     referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 
     the Union.
       H.R. 1555. The Committee on the Judiciary discharged. H.R. 
     1555 referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
     State of the Union.
```
§ 350.307 How may a State obtain a new exemption for State laws or regulations for a specific industry involved in intrastate commerce? FMCSA will only consider a State's request to exempt a specific industry from all or part of a State's laws or regulations applicable to intrastate commerce if the State submits adequate documentation containing information allowing FMCSA to evaluate: ( a ) The type and scope of the industry exemption request, including the percentage of the industry it affects, number of vehicles, mileage traveled, and number of companies it involves;
( b ) The type and scope of the requirement to which the exemption would apply;
( c ) The safety performance of that specific industry (*e.g.,* crash frequency, rates, and comparative figures);
( d ) Inspection information (*e.g.,* number of violations per inspection, and driver and vehicle out-of-service information);
( e ) Other CMV safety regulations enforced by other State agencies not participating in MCSAP;
( f ) The commodity the industry transports (*e.g.,* livestock or grain);
( g ) Similar exemptions granted and the circumstances under which they were granted;
( h ) The justification for the exemption; and
( i ) Any identifiable effects on safety.
###### Editorial Note on Part 365

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 365 appear at 66 FR 49870, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 365.303 Contacting another party.

When a person wishes to contact a party or serve a pleading or letter on that party, it shall do so through its representative. The phone and FAX numbers and address of applicant's representative shall be listed in the *FMCSA Register.*
1210-AB32-2-1134.html[7/24/2015 6:27:46 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-qnun

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1628

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

The government is not smart enough to plan my retirement! My finances are not the responsibility of

 government.
1210-AB32-2-1158.html[7/24/2015 7:01:04 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvr-3n1d

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1652

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: John Molina

General Comment

Dear Federal Government,

I am more than capable of planning for my own retirement and do not need any government body to do this for

 me. Thanks for listening. 

Sincerely, 

John P. Molina, Au.D.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

## Agenda

# Time and Date:

9:30 a.m., Tuesday, October 2, 2007.

# Place:

NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20594.

# Status:

The one item is open to the public.

# Matter to be Considered:

775E: Aircraft Accident Report—Runway Overrun and Collision, Southwest Airlines (SWA) flight 1248, Boeing 737-74H, N471WN, Chicago Midway International Airport (MDW), Chicago, Illinois, December 8, 2005.

# News Media Contact:

Telephone: (202) 314-6100.

Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Chris Bisett at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, September 28, 2007.

                        The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by accessing a link under “News & Events” on the NTSB home page                         *http://www.ntsb.gov.*

# For Further Information Contact:

Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

Dated: September 21, 2007.

Vicky D'Onofrio,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-4733  Filed 9-21-07; 1:11 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
From: Sanjay Manchanda [mailto:sanjay.manchanda1@gmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:07 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Mental Health Parity Act

 I am a marriage and family therapist who provides counseling, parenting skills 

information, and neurofeedback treatment to individuals and families for 

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Mood Disorders. Neurofeedback is 

an empirically validated and widely recognized effective non-medication 

treatment for ADHD, as well as other conditions. There are over 50 studies 

evaluating the effectiveness of neurofeedback in the treatment of ADHD, 

substance use disorders and Autism. A recent review of this literature 

concluded "Neurofeedback meets the American Academy of Child and 

Adolescent Psychiatry criteria for Clinical Guidelines for treatment of ADHD." 

This means that neurofeedback meets the same criteria as medication for 

treating ADHD, of which 60% of prescriptions are in fact prescribed "off label," 

and that neurofeedback "should always be considered as an intervention for 

this disorder by the clinician." 

 

This service has been denied by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, United Behavioral 

Health, Blue Cross, Cigna, and Amerigroup. 

 

This is limitation of an effective and validated treatment for a mental health 

problem. The reasons given by the insurance companies for this denial fell into 

two categories: 1) our company does not cover biofeedback for mental health 

problems or 2) there is not yet sufficient evidence for the efficacy of 

neurofeedback. As such, they are using evidence-based criteria that are far 

more restrictive for mental health services than the criteria which are used for 

medical/surgical services. There are many routine medical and surgical 

procedures which have far fewer controlled studies about their efficacy than 

does neurofeedback. These medical and surgical procedures are generally not 

limited because of concerns about how many controlled studies have been 

performed about them. 

 We believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity 

statute should require that employers and plans pay for the same range and 

scope of services for behavioral treatments as they do for medical surgical 

benefits and that a plan cannot be more restrictive in their managed care 

criteria and reviews for mental health and substance abuse disorders when 

compared to medical surgery. Today plans are being more restrictive in how 

they review evidenced-based mental health and Substance Abuse Treatments 

when compared to medical surgical treatments. This violates both the intent 

and letter of the parity statute and we hope that the regulations will clarify 

that this can't continue.

Thank you.
--Sanjay Manchanda

Sanjay Manchanda Ph.D. LAMFT

Integrative Counseling Services

Tucson, Arizona
Editorial Note on Part 387
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 387 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 387.315 Insurance and surety companies. A certificate of insurance or surety bond will not be accepted by the FMCSA unless issued by an insurance or surety company that is authorized (licensed or admitted) to issue bonds or underlying insurance policies: ( a ) In each State in which the motor carrier is authorized by the FMCSA to operate, or
( b ) In the State in which the motor carrier has its principal place of business or domicile, and will designate in writing upon request by the FMCSA, a person upon whom process, issued by or under the authority of a court of competent jurisdiction, may be served in any proceeding at law or equity brought in any State in which the carrier operates, or
( c ) In any State, and is eligible as an excess or surplus lines insurer in any State in which business is written, and will make the designation of process agent described in paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) In the Province or Territory of Canada in which a Canadian motor carrier has its principal place of business or domicile, and will designate in writing upon request by FMCSA, a person upon whom process, issued by or under the authority of a court of competent jurisdiction, may be served in any proceeding at law or equity brought in any State in which the carrier operates.
[56 FR 28111, June 19, 1991, as amended at 75 FR 38430, July 2, 2010; 78 FR 58482, Sept. 24, 2013]
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–308 

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 2528, MILITARY QUALITY OF LIFE AND VETERANS AFFAIRS APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2006 

NOVEMBER 18 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 17), 2005.—Referred to the House 

Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 564] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 564, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report to accompany H.R. 2528, Military Quality of Life and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Act, 2006, and against its consideration. The rule further provides that the conference report shall be 

considered as read. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the conference report includes a waiver of clause 8 of rule XXII (requiring 

a three-day layover of conference reports and the accompanying 

joint explanatory statement), which is necessary because the conference report (H. Rept. 109–305) was not filed until the legislative 

day of Thursday, November 17, 2005, and the conference report 

may be considered by the House as early as the legislative day of 

Friday, November 18, 2005. 

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.117 Duration of safety monitoring system. ( a ) Each Mexico-domiciled carrier subject to this subpart will remain in the safety monitoring system for at least 18 months from the date FMCSA issues its provisional Certificate of Registration or provisional operating authority, except as provided in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section.
( b ) If, at the end of this 18-month period, the carrier's most recent safety audit or safety rating was Satisfactory and no additional enforcement or safety improvement actions are pending under this subpart, the Mexico-domiciled carrier's provisional operating authority or provisional Certificate of Registration will become permanent.
( c ) If, at the end of this 18-month period, the FMCSA has not been able to conduct a safety audit or compliance review, the carrier will remain in the safety monitoring system until a safety audit or compliance review is conducted. If the results of the safety audit or compliance review are satisfactory, the carrier's provisional operating authority or provisional Certificate of Registration will become permanent.
( d ) If, at the end of this 18-month period, the carrier's provisional operating authority or provisional Certificate of Registration is suspended under § 385.111(a) of this subpart, the carrier will remain in the safety monitoring system until the FMCSA either: ( 1 ) Determines that the carrier has taken corrective action; or
( 2 ) Completes measures to revoke the carrier's provisional operating authority or provisional Certificate of Registration under § 385.111(c) of this subpart.
#### In the Matter of John M. Newton.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs against appellant. Mem. by

Bocees, J.:

Learned, P. J., not acting.