alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 53269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4644]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


September 17, 2007 Public Hearing

    OPIC's Sunshine Act notice of its Public Hearing in Conjunction 
with each Board meeting was published in the Federal Register (Volume 
72, Number 176, Page 52169) on September 12, 2007. No requests were 
received to provide testimony or submit written statements for the 
record; therefore, OPIC's public hearing scheduled for 2 p.m., 
September 17, 2007 in conjunction with OPIC's September 20, 2007 Board 
of Directors meeting has been cancelled.
    Contact Person for Information: Information on the hearing 
cancellation may be obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438, 
via facsimile at (202) 218-0136, or via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0b3b4bfa7be90bfa0b9b3feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b585f544c557b544b5258155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 14, 2007.
Connie M. Downs,
OPIC Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-4644 Filed 9-14-07; 2:19 pm]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0620.html[7/21/2015 7:17:46 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-mdj3

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0620

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Peter anzuini

Address:

south freeport, 04078

Email: panzuini@aol.com

General Comment

Please make your proposal readable by a college graduate, currently this is full of legalize! Does your proposal

 restrict who can provide advice on financial investment, i also noted that you are not restricting insurance sales

 people.

Make this understandable!!!!!
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1475.html[7/23/2015 11:48:09 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-1088

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1475

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Laura Rosso

General Comment

I can handle my own money and retirement !!
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1




Base Salary and Bonus Information for Certain Executive Officers




     The
following summarizes the current compensation information regarding certain of the issuer’s executive
officers. It is intended only to be a summary of existing arrangements and is not intended to
provide any additional rights to any officer.



     On March 13, 2006, the Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) of the Board of
Directors of Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation (the “Company”) approved new annual base salaries
(effective March 27, 2006) of the Company’s executive officers for fiscal 2006. The following
table sets forth new annual base salaries of the Company’s Named Executive Officers (as determined
by reference to the Company’s proxy statement dated November 7, 2005) and the Company’s Senior Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (salary information for the prior year is included
for comparison purposes):



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	NAME AND POSITION	 	FISCAL YEAR	 	ANNUAL SALARY
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Steven G. Miller
	 	 	2006	 	 	$	443,000	 
	Chairman of the Board, President and
	 	 	2005	 	 	$	433,000	 
	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Barry D. Emerson
	 	 	2006	 	 	$	300,000	 
	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
	 	 	2005	 	 	$	275,000	 
	Officer and Treasurer
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Thomas J. Schlauch
	 	 	2006	 	 	$	251,000	 
	Senior Vice President, Buying
	 	 	2005	 	 	$	243,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Richard A. Johnson
	 	 	2006	 	 	$	225,000	 
	Senior Vice President, Store Operations
	 	 	2005	 	 	$	217,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Gary S. Meade
	 	 	2006	 	 	$	190,000	 
	Senior Vice President, General Counsel
	 	 	2005	 	 	$	177,000	 
	and Secretary
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 






     Also, on March 13, 2006, the Compensation Committee authorized the payment of an annual cash
bonus to each of the foregoing executive officers in respect of the year ended January 1, 2006
(fiscal 2005), which amounts were as follows (bonuses previously paid for the prior year
are shown for comparison purposes):



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	NAME	 	FISCAL YEAR	 	BONUS
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Steven G. Miller
	 	 	2005	 	 	$	415,000	 
	 
	 	 	2004	 	 	$	615,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Thomas J. Schlauch
	 	 	2005	 	 	$	200,000	 
	 
	 	 	2004	 	 	$	217,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Richard A. Johnson
	 	 	2005	 	 	$	180,000	 
	 
	 	 	2004	 	 	$	197,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Barry D. Emerson
	 	 	2005	 	 	$	100,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Gary S. Meade
	 	 	2005	 	 	$	100,000	 
	 
	 	 	2004	 	 	$	98,000
V

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 905

To provide for the relief of Kathy Barrett.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 2001

Mr. FRANK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide for the relief of Kathy Barrett.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHARGING OF EXCESS EARNINGS TO ALL

4 MONTHS IN THE TAXABLE YEAR.

5 Notwithstanding section 203(f) of the Social Security

6 Act, the amount of excess earnings with which Kathy Bar7 rett of Debra Road in Pembroke, Massachusetts, is

8 charged for each month in a taxable year for purposes of

section 203(b) of such Act shall be equal to 1 9 ⁄12 of the

10 total amount of her excess earnings, if any, which would
2

•HR 905 IH

1 be charged to months in the entire taxable year under such

2 section 203(f) in the absence of this section.

Æ
1210-AB32-2-1237.html[7/24/2015 9:14:49 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvt-6tly

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1732

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: LYNN ARNOLD

General Comment

I do NOT NEED HELP with administrating my retirement funds. I do not want any governmental agency or

personell with my retirement information let alone telling me how to spend or use.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                         COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION

                            SCHEDULE OF SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        STATE OF
SUBSIDIARY NAME                                                         INCORPORATION
---------------                                                         -------------
<S>                                                                     <C>
N.P.H.S., Inc.                                                          California

CareManor Hospital of Washington, Inc.                                  Washington

Trinity Oaks Hospital, Inc.                                             Texas

Starting Point Incorporated                                             California

CareUnit Hospital of Albuquerque, Inc.                                  New Mexico

Comprehensive Care Corporation                                          Delaware

CareUnit Clinic of Washington, Inc.                                     Washington

CareUnit Hospital of Ohio, Inc.                                         Ohio

Comprehensive Care Integration, Inc.                                    Delaware

CareUnit of Florida, Inc.                                               Florida

Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.                                     Nevada

Managed Behavioral Healthcare, Inc.                                     Florida

AccessCare of Washington, Inc.                                          Washington

Healthcare Management Services, Inc.                                    Michigan

Healthcare Management Services of Michigan, Inc.                        Michigan

Healthcare Management Services of Ohio, Inc.                            Michigan

Behavioral Health Management, Inc.                                      Michigan

Comprehensive Health Associates                                         Puerto Rico

Comprehensive Orthopedic Care, Inc.                                     Florida

Aurora Behavioral Health Hospital, Inc.                                 Colorado
</TABLE>


                                       66
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

VANESSA B. CHAUVIN; LORIANN ) CHAUVIN; and DAVID B. CHAUVIN, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2591 ) SCHOOL BOARD OF PINELLAS ) COUNTY, a Florida governmental entity ) and JANE DOE, a minor by and through ) her parents and natural guardians, M.D. ) and P.D., ) ) Appellees. ) ) Opinion filed September 13, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Jack R. St. Arnold, Judge. Hannah E. Austin and Michael V. Laurato of Austin & Laurato, P.A., Tampa, for Appellants. DeeAnn J. McLemore and Charles W. Hall of Banker Lopez Gassler P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellee School Board of Pinellas County. No appearance for Appellee Jane Doe.- 2 -

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. BLACK, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                ------------
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THTE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of AmBase  Corporation (the "Company")
on Form  10-K  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2006 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P.
Ferrara, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date:  March 29, 2007
                                                      /s/ John P. Ferrara
                                                      -------------------
                                                       John P. Ferrara
                                                       Vice President and
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                                       AmBase Corporation
§ 525.11 Termination of exemption; amendment of alternative average fuel economy standard. ( a ) Any exemption granted under this part for an affected model year does not apply to a manufacturer that is ineligible under § 525.5 for an exemption in that model year.
( b ) The administrator may initiate rulemaking either on his own motion or on petition by an interested person to terminate an exemption granted under this part or to amend an alternative average fuel economy standard established under this part.
( c ) Any interested persons may petition the Administrator to terminate an exemption granted under this part or to amend an alternative average fuel economy standard established under this part.
_____________ No. 94-4054EA

_____________ Danny L. Ball; * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * John L. Grigsby, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * Larry Norris, Director, * Arkansas Department of * Appeal from the United States Correction; PHP Healthcare, * District Court for the Eastern Inc.; Dr. Jackie Wade, * District of Arkansas. Diagnostic Unit, Arkansas * Department of Correction; Dr. * [UNPUBLISHED] Jay Owens, Cummins Unit, * Arkansas Department of * Correction; Delois Ford, Unit * Nurse, Originally sued as "Mrs. * Ford"; Sue Guirl, Warden; Lt. * Roger Ferrell, Mississippi * County Work Release Center, * Arkansas Department of * Correction, * * Defendants-Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: May 16, 1996 Filed: July 1, 1996

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

_____________
PER CURIAM.
Danny L. Ball appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having reviewed de novo the evidence presented at a pretrial evidentiary hearing to determine whether Ball's case would survive a motion fo r judgment as a matter of law, see Hobbs v.

### -2-

Lockhart , 46 F.3d 864, 868 (8th Cir. 1995), we conclude Ball's evidence di d not establish a jury question on his claim the defendants acted wit h deliberate indifferen ce to Ball's serious medical needs when they delayed sending him to an oral surgeon. See Estelle v. Gamble , 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976).
Ball failed to show any personal involvement on the part of th e Arkansas Department of Correction employees, PHP Healthcare, Inc. (PHP), and PHP Nurse Delois Ford in denying or delaying his medical treatment
. Ball cannot predicate his Eighth Amendment claim against these defendants on a risk of harm of which they were unaware or on a respondent superior theory. Boyd v. Knox , 47 F.3d 966, 968-69 (8th Cir. 1995). Ball's testimony established he saw PHP Dentist Jackie Wade for tooth pain only once. Wade prescribed penicillin for two abscesses, and Ball di d not seek treatment again until several months later. At that time, PH P Dentist J ay Owens told Ball he had two abscesses and an impacted wisdo m tooth, prescribed penicillin and pain relievers, and ultimately referred Ball to an outside oral surgeon who removed six of Ball's teeth. Bal l produc ed no evidence that Wade or Owens intentionally delayed Ball' s treatment or his refe rral to a specialist. See Estelle , 429 U.S. at 104- 05. The only damage Ball attributed to the delay in his dental surgery wa s pain, and Ball's test imony showed his pain relief was compromised because he s hared his pain medication with another inmate. Further, at ora l argument, Ball's counsel conceded that Ball would have been pain free if he had ta ken all of his pain medication. Thus, Ball's Eighth Amendmen t claimfails because Ball did not suffer any detrimental effects from the delay in medical treatment. See Beyerbach v. Se ars , 49 F.3d 1324, 1326-27 (8th Cir. 1995).
We affirm.

### -3- A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1210-AB32-2-1068.html[7/23/2015 3:42:37 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-grun

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1560

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Steve Wakefield

General Comment

DO NOT TOUCH MY 401K! It is mine to do with how I wish. I do not need some government entity/person

 dictating to me what they view is best for me. THAT is my choice on how to make those decisions!

Give advice to me, yes. Layout out guidelines that can help in the decision process, yes. Anything outside of this

 is not acceptable.

Only those that have been Ill served and ill educated by our educational system would think that having the

 government play a role in determining how best to use our retirement plans is a good idea.

Stay away from mine! It is me (and only me) that has the right to make those decisions.
1210-AB32-2-1599.html[7/26/2015 8:44:24 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxx-690u

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2096

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Robin Flatt Homa

General Comment

I am able to manage my own finances, and I resent and reject your proposed rules to change my right to manage

 my own 401K.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.299 What is the SAP's role and what are the limits on a SAP's discretion in referring employees for education and treatment? ( a ) As a SAP, upon your determination of the best recommendation for assistance, you will serve as a referral source to assist the employee's entry into an education and/or treatment program.
( b ) To prevent the appearance of a conflict of interest, you must not refer an employee requiring assistance to your private practice or to a person or organization from which you receive payment or to a person or organization in which you have a financial interest. You are precluded from making referrals to entities with which you are financially associated.
( c ) There are four exceptions to the prohibitions contained in paragraph (b) of this section. You may refer an employee to any of the following providers of assistance, regardless of your relationship with them: ( 1 ) A public agency (*e.g.,* treatment facility) operated by a state, county, or municipality;
( 2 ) The employer or a person or organization under contract to the employer to provide alcohol or drug treatment and/or education services (*e.g.,* the employer's contracted treatment provider);
( 3 ) The sole source of therapeutically appropriate treatment under the employee's health insurance program (*e.g.,* the single substance abuse in-patient treatment program made available by the employee's insurance coverage plan); or
( 4 ) The sole source of therapeutically appropriate treatment reasonably available to the employee (*e.g.,* the only treatment facility or education program reasonably located within the general commuting area).
-----Original Message----- 

From: nblakelisw@yahoo.com [mailto:nblakelisw@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:46 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Nancy Blake 

26700 Alsace Ct 

Beachwood, OH 44122
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 158 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 158

 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2001

Mr. Foley submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be and are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committees of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Government Reform: Mr. Duncan.
    Committee on Science: Mr. Gilchrest.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Shuster.
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: Mr. Ney to rank 
after Mr. Baker, Mr. Culberson, and Mr. Shuster.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.307 Pressure testing aboveground breakout tanks. ( a ) For aboveground breakout tanks built to API Spec 12F (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3) and first placed in service after October 2, 2000, pneumatic testing must be performed in accordance with section 5.3 of API Spec 12 F.
( b ) For aboveground breakout tanks built to API Std 620 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3) and first placed in service after October 2, 2000, hydrostatic and pneumatic testing must be performed in accordance with section 7.18 of API Std 620.
( c ) For aboveground breakout tanks built to API Std 650 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3) that were first placed into service after October 2, 2000, testing must be conducted in accordance with Sections 7.3.6 and 7.3.7 of API Std 650.
( d ) For aboveground atmospheric pressure breakout tanks constructed of carbon and low alloy steel, welded or riveted, and non-refrigerated tanks built to API Std 650 or its predecessor Standard 12 C that are returned to service after October 2, 2000, the necessity for the hydrostatic testing of repair, alteration, and reconstruction is covered in section 12.3 of API Std 653 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3).
( e ) For aboveground breakout tanks built to API Std 2510 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3) and first placed in service after October 2, 2000, pressure testing must be performed in accordance with 2007 ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) (Section VIII, Division 1 or 2).
[Amdt. 195-99, 80 FR 187, Jan. 5, 2015, as amended by Amdt. 195-100, 80 FR 12780, Mar. 11, 2015; Amdts. 192-135, 195-107, 89 FR 33284, Apr. 29, 2024]