alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA hybrid M-algorithm/sequential decoder for convolutional and trellis codesThe Viterbi Algorithm (VA) is optimum in the sense of being maximum likelihood for decoding codes with a trellis structure. However, since the VA is in fact an exhaustive search of the code trellis, the complexity of the VA grows exponentially with the constraint length upsilon. This limits its application to codes with small values of upsilon and relatively modest coding gains. The M-Algorithm (MA) is a limited search scheme which carries forward M paths in the trellis, all of the same length. All successors of the M paths are extended at the next trellis depth, and all but the best M of these are dropped. Since a limited search convolutional decoder will flounder indefinitely if one of the paths in storage is not the correct one, the data are usually transmitted in blocks. It has been shown that the performance of the MA approaches the VA at high signal to noise ratios (SNR's) with an M which is far less than the 2 sup upsilon states in the full trellis. Thus the MA can be used with larger values of upsilon, making larger coding gains possible at high SNR's. However, it still requires a relatively large fixed computational effort to achieve good performance.Document ID19900017212Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsWang, Fu-Quan*(Notre Dame Univ. IN, United States)*Costello, Daniel J., Jr.*(Notre Dame Univ. IN, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 29, 1990Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186863NASA-CR-186863Accession Number90N26528Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG5-557CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF NCR-89-03429Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017212.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
PAUL R. LEPAGE

GOVERNOR STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

May 3, 2011 David Conroy, Chief Air Programs Branch U .S. EPARegion I-NE 5 Post Office Square Mail Code: OEP 05-2 Boston, Ma. 02109-3912 Enclosed please find for your approval and inclusion into Maine's State Implementation Plan (SIP), Chapter 129, Surface Coating Facilities. Apublic comment period was held October 13, 2010 until November 12, 2010 in accordance with federal and state administrative requirements. Public notice ofthe hearingwas published in newspapers statewide on October 13, 2010 . On January 6, 2011, the Board ofEnvironmental Protection adopted Chapter 129 . The following administrative materials are enclosed: JAMES P . BROOKS ACTING COMMISSIONER

1 . Memorandum

to the Board of Environmental Protection requesting a public comment period dated September 2, 2010; 2 . Copy of the public notice that appeared in the Kennebec Journal on October 13, 2010 ; 3. Memorandum

to the Board of Environmental Protection requesting adoption of the rule, dated January 6, 2011 ; 4. Chapter 129Surface Coating Facilities as adopted by the Board of Environmental Protection on January 6, 2011 with an effective date ofApril 16, 2011 ;

AUGUSTA 17 STATE HOUSE STATION BANGOR PORTLAND PRESQUE ISLE AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0017 106 HOGAN ROAD, SUITE 6 312 CANCOROAD 1235 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK (207) 287-7688 FAX

: (207) 287-7826 BANGOR, MAINE 04401 PORTLAND, MAINE 04103 PRESQUE ISLE, MAINE 04679-2094 RAY BLDG

., HOSPITAL ST. (207) 941-4570 FAX : (207) 941-4584 (207) 822-6300 FAX : (207) 822-6303 (207) 764-0477 FAX : (207) 760-3143 web site: www

.maine .gov/dep5. Summary of comments and the Department's response; and

6. MAPA I formfor Chapter 129 whichprovides certification by the Commissioner that apublic comment period was held; the Board of Environmental Protection lawfully adopted this rule on January 6, 2011 and certification that the Attorney General approved the rule as to formand legality. Should you have any questions, please contact Carolyn Wheeler at (207) 287-2437. Sincerely, James P . Brooks Acting Commissioner Department of Environmental Protection Enclosures cc: Anne Arnold Carolyn Wheeler w/o encl SIP file
IV

House Calendar No. 35

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 150

[Report No. 107–81]

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 24, 2001

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported

from the Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider reports from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day they are presented

4 to the House is waived with respect to resolutions reported

5 on the legislative day of May 26, 2001, providing for con6 sideration or disposition of any measure to provide for rec7 onciliation pursuant to section 104 of the concurrent reso-
2

HRES 150 RH

1 lution on the budget for fiscal year 2002, any amendment

2 thereto, any conference report thereon, or any amendment

3 reported in disagreement from a conference thereon.

House Calendar No. 35

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 150

[Report No. 107–81]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII

with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

MAY 24, 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### § 37.173 Training requirements.

Each public or private entity which operates a fixed route or demand responsive system shall ensure that personnel are trained to proficiency, as appropriate to their duties, so that they operate vehicles and equipment safely and properly assist and treat individuals with disabilities who use the service in a respectful and courteous way, with appropriate attention to the difference among individuals with disabilities.
#### § 236.723 Circuit, double wire; line.

An electric circuit not employing a common return wire; a circuit formed by individual wires throughout.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 10, 1995 (125), Para 125.21 Subpoena]
[Page 1498]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.125.21  subpoena

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, laid before the House a 
communication, which was read as follows:

         House of Representatives, Office of the Chief 
           Administrative Officer,
                                  Washington, DC, October 4, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     Speaker, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
     Re Shafer-Tasso v. Henry and USAA Casualty Insurance Company

       Dear Mr. Speaker: This is to formally notify you pursuant 
     to Rule L (50) of the Rules of the House that my Office has 
     been served with a subpoena issued by the Circuit Court, 
     Fourth Judicial Circuit, of Duval County, Florida.
       After consultation with the General Counsel, I have 
     determined that compliance with the subpoena is consistent 
     with the privileges and precedents of the House.
           Sincerely,
                                                 Scot M. Faulkner,
                                     Chief Administrative Officer.

  And then,
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40323

Conference Calendar

 

LEROY EVANS, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN DALTON, Secretary of the Navy,

Office of Personnel Management

and Office of Special Counsel,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-96-565

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Leroy Evans, Jr., argues that the district court erred in

dismissing his petition for mandamus relief in which Evans sought

an order directing the Office of Special Counsel to reconsider

Evan’s appeal of the denial of his request for the

reclassification of his position as a management analyst.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs and find that the

district court’s dismissal of Evans’ petition for mandamus based
No. 97-40323

-2-

on the lack of subject matter jurisdiction should be affirmed

substantially for the reasons adopted by the district court. See

Evans v. Dalton, No. C-96-565 (S.D. Tex.; Jan. 14, 1997);

DeLeonardis v. Weisman, 986 F.2d 725, 726 (5th Cir. 1993). 

AFFIRMED.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA-2013 - 0544 Directorate Identifier: 2012 - NM - 057 -AD

777 - 24 - 0077, R3 --- 12/6/11 777 - 24 - 0077, R2 --- 12/17/09 777 - 24 - 0077, R1 --- 5/24/07 777 - 24 - 0077 --- 8/21/03 777 - 23 - 0176, R1 --- 3/11/04 777 - 23 - 0176 --- 1/9/03 777 - 24 - 0087, R1 --- 12/18/03 777 - 24 - 0087 --- 7/24/03

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket



### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
IV

House Calendar No. 83

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 263

[Report No. 107–237]

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 12 (legislative day, OCTOBER 11), 2001

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported

from the Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of Friday, October 12, 2001,

6 providing for consideration or disposition of the bill (H.R.

7 2975) to combat terrorism, and for other purposes.
House Calendar No. 83

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 263

[Report No. 107–237]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII

with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

OCTOBER 12 (legislative day, OCTOBER 11), 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Editorial Note on Part 450
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 450 appear at 74 FR 49241, Sept. 25, 2009, and at 77 FR 59790, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 450.11 Application for delegation of authority. ( a ) Any person or organization seeking delegation of authority to act as an Approval Authority may apply to the Commandant (CG-OES), Attn: Office of Operating and Environmental Standards, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509. Each application must be signed and certified by the applicant or, if the applicant is an organization, by an authorized officer of the organization. A list of delegated approval authorities may be obtained from the Commandant (CG-OES).
( b ) The application must include the following information: ( 1 ) Name and address, including place of incorporation, if a corporation.
( 2 ) A description of the organization, including the ownership, managerial structure, organizational components and directly affiliated agencies and their functions utilized for supporting technical services.
( 3 ) A listing of the basic technical services offered.
( 4 ) A general description of the geographic area served.
( 5 ) A general description of the clients being served or intended to be served.
( 6 ) A description of the types of work performed by the applicant in the past, noting the amount and extent of such work performed within the previous three years.
( 7 ) A description of the personnel to be utilized, indicating general background and qualifications, particularly for the surveyors to be involved in the actual witnessing of tests.
( 8 ) A description of its means of assuring continued competence of its personnel.
( 9 ) A detailed schedule of the fees proposed to be charged for the approval service.
( 10 ) Evidence of financial stability.
( 11 ) At least three business references who will furnish information regarding work performed by the applicant.
( 12 ) A statement that the Coast Guard may inspect the applicant's facilities and records of approvals under the convention and these regulations.
( c ) The application may contain any additional information the applicant deems to be pertinent.
( d ) The applicant must furnish any additional information to evaluate the applicant's qualifications, if requested by the Chief, Office of Operating and Environmental Standards (CG-OES), U.S. Coast Guard.
( e ) Applications from foreign nationals or organizations must contain an affidavit stating that the agency responsible for implementing the Convention in their country has delegated to the applicant an approval authority, and that it also delegates similar authority to United States citizens or organizations having delegations from the United States. The affidavit must also contain the name and address of the agency to which U.S. citizens or organizations must apply for delegation as an approval authority.
[45 FR 37213, June 2, 1980, as amended at 47 FR 50496, Nov. 8, 1982; 69 FR 58352, Sept. 30, 2004; 74 FR 49241, Sept. 25, 2009; 78 FR 60165, Sept. 30, 2013]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1236.html[7/22/2015 8:59:43 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-z8ju

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1236

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Do NOT impose restriction on my 401k. It is my hard earned money, and I deserve to do whatever I want with it.

From a concerned citizen;

Sydnie
**EXHIBIT 24.13**

 

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Ronald Rubin do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name andon my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2006 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform allthings necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

 

 

DATE:February 5, 2007
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32(b)

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

      I, Joseph H. Black, certify that:

      6.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of County Bank
Corp.;

      7.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

      8.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

      9.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      d)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

      e)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      f)    Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

      10.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

      c)    All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      d)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

      6.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date or our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 25, 2005

By: /s/ Joseph H. Black
    -------------------
    Joseph H. Black, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 325
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 325 appear at 66 FR 49869, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 325.79 Application of correction factors. ( a ) If two correction factors apply to a measurement they are applied cumulatively.
( b ) The following examples illustrate the application of correction factors to sound level measurement readings: ( 1 ) *Example 1—Highway operations.* Assume that a motor vehicle generates a maximum observed sound level reading of 86 dB(A) during a measurement in accordance with the rules in subpart D of this part. Assume also that the distance between the microphone location point and the microphone target point is 60 feet (18.3 m) and that the measurement area of the test site is acoustically “hard.” The corrected sound level generated by the motor vehicle would be 85 dB(A), calculated as follows: 86 dB(A) Uncorrected reading + 1 dB(A) Distance correction factor −2 dB(A) Ground surface correction factor __________ 85 dB(A) Corrected reading
( 2 ) *Example 2—Stationary test.* Assume that a motor vehicle generates maximum sound level readings which average 88 dB(A) during a measurement in accordance with the rules in subpart E of this part. Assume also that the distance between the microphone location point and the microphone target point is 35 feet (10.7 m), and that the measurement area of the test site is acoustically “soft.” The corrected sound level generated by the motor vehicle would be 87 dB(A), calculated as follows:
88 dB(A) Uncorrected average of readings −3 dB(A) Distance correction factor + 2 dB(A) Ground surface correction factor __________ 87 dB(A) Corrected reading
§ 366.6 Cancellation or change. ( a ) A designation may be canceled or changed only by a new designation made by the motor carrier, broker, or freight forwarder, or by the process agent or company filing a blanket designation in accordance with § 366.5. However, where a motor carrier, broker or freight forwarder's USDOT Number is inactive for at least 1 year, designation is no longer required and may be canceled without making another designation.
( b ) A change to a designation, such as name, address, or contact information, must be reported to FMCSA within 30 days of the change.
( c ) Whenever a motor carrier, broker or freight forwarder changes it name, address, or contact information, it must report the change to its process agents and/or the company making a blanket designation on its behalf in accordance with § 366.5 within 30 days of the change.
( d ) Whenever a process agent and/or company making a blanket designation on behalf of a motor carrier, broker, or freight forwarder terminates its contract or relationship with the entity, it should report the termination to FMCSA within 30 days of the termination. If process agents and/or blanket agents do not keep their information up to date, FMCSA may withdraw its approval of their authority to make process agent designations with the Agency.
[80 FR 63706, Oct. 21, 2015] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 82 FR 5303, Jan. 17, 2017, § 366.6 was suspended, effective Jan. 14, 2017.
1210-AB32-2-1239.html[7/24/2015 9:14:49 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvt-tie9

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1734

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I am smart enough to handle my own retirement accounts.
1210-AB32-2-1479.html[7/26/2015 5:50:00 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwh-kd1w

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1975

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I truly believe that my financial advisor is smart enough to do the job of taking care of my 401K. 

We don't need the government in control of this process. It common knowledge that government 

Involvement will only cost me the taxpayer money for which I will receive nothing in return.