alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         564,922
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,188,673
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,880,225
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,984,873
<PP&E>                                     129,152,536
<DEPRECIATION>                              41,124,846
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             140,915,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,172,345
<BONDS>                                     21,700,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    43,378,440
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,912,779
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               140,915,945
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,968,966
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,875,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             553,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             13,587,683
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,202,359
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,385,324
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,385,324
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.644
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.642


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2479 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2479

                 For the relief of James A. Strickland.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 12, 1995

   Mr. Rose introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 For the relief of James A. Strickland.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT FOR ATTORNEYS FEES.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to James A. Strickland of 
Fayetteville, North Carolina, the sum of $2,745.31. Such sum was paid 
by James A. Strickland to his attorney for services rendered in 
connection with James A. Strickland's attempt to obtain standby pay 
from the Veterans Administration for work as a radiology technologist.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

    It shall be unlawful for an amount that exceeds 10 percent of the 
sum described in section 1 to be paid to or received by any attorney or 
agent for services rendered in connection with the claim described in 
such section. Any person who violates this section shall be guilty of 
an infraction and shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided in 
title 18, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0532.html[7/20/2015 8:18:59 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-jeyw

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0532

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: William Foreman

Address:

3172 S Hannibal St

Aurora, CO, 80013

Email: grvyrddog@hotmail.com

General Comment

Over the last 32 years, I have set out a plan that would carry me into retirement comfortably. KEEP YOUR

 HANDS OFF MY MONEY !!!!!
Editorial Note on Part 381
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 381 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 381.400 What is a pilot program? ( a ) A pilot program is a study in which temporary regulatory relief from one or more FMCSR is given to a person or class of persons subject to the regulations, or a person or class of persons who intend to engage in an activity that would be subject to the regulations.
( b ) During a pilot program, the participants would be given an exemption from one or more sections or parts of the regulations for a period of up to three years.
( c ) A pilot program is intended for use in collecting specific data for evaluating alternatives to the regulations or innovative approaches to safety while ensuring that the safety performance goals of the regulations are satisfied.
( d ) The number of participants in the pilot program must be large enough to ensure statistically valid findings.
( e ) Pilot programs must include an oversight plan to ensure that participants comply with the terms and conditions of participation, and procedures to protect the health and safety of study participants and the general public.
( f ) Exemptions for pilot programs may be granted only from one or more of the requirements contained in the following parts and sections of the FMCSRs: ( 1 ) Part 380—Special Training Requirements;
( 2 ) Part 382—Controlled Substances and Alcohol Use and Testing;
( 3 ) Part 383—Commercial Driver's License Standards; Requirements and Penalties;
( 4 ) Part 384—State Compliance with Commercial Driver's License Program;
( 5 ) Part 391—Qualifications of Drivers;
( 6 ) Part 392—Driving of Commercial Motor Vehicles;
( 7 ) Part 393—Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation;
( 8 ) Part 395—Hours of Service of Drivers;
( 9 ) Part 396—Inspection, Repair, and Maintenance (except for § 396.25); and
( 10 ) Part 399—Step, Handhold and Deck Requirements.
[63 FR 67608, Dec. 8, 1998, as amended at 86 FR 35639, July 7, 2021]
###### Editorial Note on Part 395

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 395 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 395.10 [Reserved]
exv10w6



 








Exhibit 10.6




FIFTH AMENDMENT

TO THE

MICHAELS STORES, INC.

EMPLOYEES 401(k) PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective August 1, 1999)



     Michaels Stores, Inc., a Delaware corporation, pursuant to authority of the Michaels Stores, Inc.
Administration Committee, adopts the following amendments to the Michaels Stores, Inc. Employees
401(k) Plan (the “Plan”).




     1. Section 9.6 of the Plan (“Direct Rollovers”) is amended by adding a new subsection thereto to
read as follows:




     (e) In the event of a mandatory distribution greater than $1,000 in accordance with
the provisions of Section 9.2(b), if the Participant does not elect to have such
distribution paid directly to an eligible retirement plan specified by the Participant in a
direct rollover or to receive the distribution directly, then the Plan will pay the
distribution in a direct rollover to an individual retirement plan designated by the
Administration Committee.



     2. The foregoing amendment will be effective with respect to distributions made on or after March
28, 2005.



     Executed this 15th day of March, 2005.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	MICHAELS STORES, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Sue Elliot
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Sue Elliot 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President - Human Resources
<PAGE>

Exhibit 11


                           MERRIMAC INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                       ---------------------------------
                                  (Unaudited)
                                  -----------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Quarters Ended              Nine Months Ended
                                                     ---------------------------  ----------------------------
                                                     September 28, September 29,  September 28,  September 29,
                                                          2002         2001           2002           2001
                                                     ---------------------------  ----------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>
Numerator:
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders...   $  57,054     $(209,339)     $ 145,692      $(103,584)
                                                        =========    ==========      =========      =========

Basic earnings (loss) per share
-------------------------------
Weighted average number of shares outstanding for
basic net income (loss) per share
Common stock.........................................   3,145,370     2,622,573      3,055,713      2,615,551
                                                        =========     =========      =========      =========
Net income (loss) per common share - basic...........      $  .02         $(.08)         $ .05          $(.04)
                                                            =====         =====          =====           ====

Diluted earnings (loss) per share
---------------------------------
Weighted average number of shares outstanding for
diluted net income (loss) per share
Common stock ........................................   3,145,370     2,622,573      3,055,713      2,615,551
Effect of dilutive securities - stock options (1) ...       2,264           -           43,181             -
                                                        ---------     ---------      ---------      ---------
Weighted average number of shares outstanding for
diluted net income (loss) per share..................   3,147,634     2,622,573      3,098,894      2,615,551
                                                        =========     =========      =========      =========
Net income (loss) per common share - diluted.........       $ .02         $(.08)         $ .05          $(.04)
                                                            =====         =====          =====           ====
</TABLE>

(1) Represents additional shares resulting from assumed conversion of
    stock options less shares purchased with the proceeds therefrom.

     Stock options and warrants did not have an effect on the computation of the
diluted loss per share in the third  quarter and nine months ended of 2001 since
they were antidilutive.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 24 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      January 31, 2001.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on House Administration: Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Mica, Mr. Linder, Mr. 
Doolittle, and Mr. Reynolds.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

# AGENCY:

Notice of Resource Advisory Committee, Sundance, WY, USDA Forest Service.

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Black Hills National Forests' Crook County Resource Advisory Committee will meet Tuesday, September 11th, 2007 in sundance, Wyoming for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The business meeting on September 11th will begin at 6:30 p.m., at the USFS Bearlodge Ranger District office, 121 South 21st Street, Sundance, Wyoming. Agenda topics will include a review of previously funded projects and consideration of FY 2008 project proposals. A public forum will begin at 8 p.m. (MT).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

Steve Kozel, Bearlodge District Ranger and Designated Federal Officer at (307) 283-1361.

Dated: August 7, 2007.

Steven J. Kozel,

District Ranger, Bearlodge Ranger District.

[FR Doc. 07-3939 Filed 8-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 5:23 PM

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyb-cy1w

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2163

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Roger Pritchett

General Comment

I am against this new regulation. We do not need more government regulation of this type. I do 

not want the government restricting my ability to control my own investments. Regulations such 

as this increase the costs of owning and managing the investments, making them less accessible 

and more expensive.
H. Res. 199

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 19, 2001.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2506) making appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs for the fiscal

year ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes. The

first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of

order against consideration of the bill for failure to comply

with clause 4 of rule XIII are waived. General debate shall

be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general

debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the

five-minute rule. The amendments printed in the report of

the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall

be considered as adopted in the House and in the Committee

of the Whole. Points of order against provisions in the bill,
2

•HRES 199 EH

as amended, for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI

are waived except as follows: page 75, lines 17 through 23;

page 107, lines 11 through 17. No further amendment to the

bill shall be in order except those printed in the portion of

the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in

clause 8 of rule XVIII and except pro forma amendments for

the purpose of debate. Each amendment so printed may be

offered only by the Member who caused it to be printed or

his designee and shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill, as amended, to the

House with such further amendments as may have been

adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered

on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without

intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or

without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.379 How do you contest the issuance of a PIE? ( a ) If you receive a NOPE, you may contest the issuance of the PIE.
( b ) If you want to contest the proposed PIE, you must provide the Director information and argument in opposition to the proposed PIE in writing, in person, and/or through a representative. To contest the proposed PIE, you must take one or more of the steps listed in this paragraph (b) within 30 days after you receive the NOPE. ( 1 ) You may request that the Director dismiss the proposed PIE without further proceedings, on the basis that it does not concern serious noncompliance with this part or DOT agency regulations, consistent with the Department's policy as stated in § 40.365.
( 2 ) You may present written information and arguments, consistent with the provisions of § 40.381, contesting the proposed PIE.
( 3 ) You may arrange with the Director for an informal meeting to present your information and arguments.
( c ) If you do not take any of the actions listed in paragraph (b) of this section within 30 days after you receive the NOPE, the matter proceeds as an uncontested case. In this event, the Director makes his or her decision based on the record provided by the initiating official (*i.e.,* the NOPE and any supporting information or testimony) and any additional information the Director obtains.
1210-AB32-2-1061.html[7/23/2015 3:42:39 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-whao

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1553

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I'm smart enough to plan for my retirement.
#### § 37.199 [Reserved]
§ 29.414 What limitations apply to Department actions related to transfer of funds associated with PSFAs? The Department will not: ( a ) Fail or refuse to transfer to a Tribe its full share of funds due under the Program, except as required by Federal law;
( b ) Withhold portions of such funds for transfer over a period of years;
( c ) Reduce the amount of funds identified for transfer in a funding agreement to make funding available for self-governance monitoring or administration by the Department;
( d ) Reduce the amount of funds included in a funding agreement in subsequent years, except pursuant to: ( 1 ) A reduction in appropriations from the previous fiscal year or a change in the funding formula;
( 2 ) A congressional directive in legislation or accompanying report;
( 3 ) A Tribal authorization;
( 4 ) A change in the amount of pass-through funds;
( 5 ) Completion of a project, activity, or program for which discretionary or competitive grant funds were provided;
( 6 ) Expenditure of all discretionary or competitive grant funds authorized by the Department under separate statutory authorities for an eligible project, activity, or program; or
( 7 ) A final decision by the Department pursuant to subpart I to terminate a compact or funding agreement (or portions thereof) due to a finding of gross mismanagement or imminent jeopardy.
( e ) Reduce the amount of funds identified in a funding agreement to pay for Federal functions, including Federal pay costs, Federal employee retirement benefits, automated data processing, technical assistance, and monitoring of activities under the Program, except that such prohibition is inapplicable when Congress authorizes the Department to set aside a portion of the funds for Department project monitoring and oversight related functions; or
( f ) Reduce the amount of funds required under the Program to pay for costs of Federal personnel displaced by compacts and funding agreements.
1210-AB32-2-1235.html[7/24/2015 9:14:47 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvt-ekia

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1730

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Do no make any laws or regulations that would prevent, restrict, regulate me from managing and using my 401K

 or other retirement funds in anyway shape or form! The current rules are already to strict and cause many

 retirees to be "fined" or otherwise lose funds because they did not act per the currently strict rules.

Remember our country is based on FREEDOM!
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 29, 2015

p0921

Order 

Clerk

September 29, 2015

150215(62)

THERESA MODZELEWSKI-SHEKOSKI,

Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF

MICHAEL RAYMOND SHEKOSKI,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150215

COA: 314830

Macomb CC: 2010-001959-NI

MICHAEL GARRETT BINDIG and ALLIED

EXCAVATION, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 30, 2015 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.