alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

# SUMMARY:

The Siuslaw Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Corvallis, OR. The purpose of the meeting is to Review RAC FY08 Business, Elect Chairperson, Set FY08 Overhead Rate, Information Share, Public Forum and 2008 Project Review/Recommendations.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held September 21, 2007 beginning at 9:30 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Siuslaw National Forest Supervisor's Office, 4077 SW Research Way, Corvallis, Oregon.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Linda Stanley, Community Development Specialist, Siuslaw National Forest, 541/928-7085 or write to Forest Supervisor, Siuslaw National Forest, 4077 SW Research Way, Corvallis, OR 97339.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A public input period will begin before 2008 project review.

Dated: August 28, 2007.

Chip Weber,

Acting Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 07-4298 Filed 8-31-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
ex101


    ADDENDUM
      TO OPTION AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 1, 2003, JUNE 15, 2004, NOVEMBER
      4TH
      2004

    FOR
      THE UNDERSHIL AIMAG “ALTAN” PROPERTY

    


    


    THIS
      ADDENDUM
      is made
      effective as of the 23rd day of March , 2006

    


    BETWEEN

    MONGOLAIN
      EXPLORATIONS LTD. (the
      “MEL”)

    A
      Nevada
      Corporation

    750
      West
      Pender Street, Ste. 1605, Vancouver, B.C., V6C 2T8

    


    &

    


    TON
      FEI
      FRED THAM & ASSOCIATES

    4323
      West
      12th
      Avenue,
      Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V6R 2P9

    


    WHEREAS:

    	1)  	
            This
              addendum does not supercede or override the Option Agreement dated
              September 1, 2003, June 15, 2004, and November 4, unless specifically
              stated herein.

          


     

    	2)  	
            Due
              to inclement weather conditions.

          


    


    WHEREAS:

    Pursuant
      to Section 2 - GRANT
      AND
      EXERCISE OF OPTION,
      MEL was
      required to incur the following exploration expenditures:

    


    	(a)  	
            (ii)
              (2) $26,444 on or before March 31, 2006 as per Option Agreement dated
              November 4, 2004

          


    	(b)  	
            (ii)
              (3) $50,000 on or before December 31, 2006;
              and

          


    	(c)  	
            (ii)
              (4) $100,000 on or before December 31,
              2007.

          


    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE:

    Section
      2
      - GRAND
      AND
      EXERCISE OF OPTION
      is
      hereby amended in the following manner:

    


    (a)
      (ii)
      (2) $26,444 on or before July 31, 2006

    (b)
      (ii)
      (3) $50,000 on or before December 31, 2006; and

    (c)
      (ii)
      (4) $100,000 on or before December 31, 2007.

    


    MEL
      hereby agrees to be bound by the terms of the Agreement to the extent that
      they
      are applicable to MEL’s interest in the Property upon exercise of the Option by
      MEL.

    


    WITNESS
      WHEREOF, this Agreement has be executed by the parties hereto as of the day
      and
      year first above written

    


    
      	
              MONGOLIAN
                EXPLORATIONS LTD

                

            	
              TON
                FEI FRED THAM & ASSOCIATES

               

            
	
              /s/
                Ivan Bebek  

              Ivan Bebek, President, Director

            	
              /s/ Ton Fei Fred Tham

              Ton
                Fei Fred Tham
###### Editorial Note on Part 386

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 386 appear at 65 FR 7755, Feb. 16, 2000, and 88 FR 80182, Nov. 17, 2023.

#### § 386.17 Intervention.

After the matter is called for hearing and before the date set for the hearing to begin, any person may petition for leave to intervene. The petition is to be served on the administrative law judge. The petition must set forth the reasons why the petitioner alleges he/she is entitled to intervene. The petition must be served on all parties in accordance with § 386.31. Any party may file a response within 10 days of service of the petition. The administrative law judge shall then determine whether to permit or deny the petition. The petition will be allowed if the administrative law judge determines that the final decision could directly and adversely affect the petitioner or the class he/she represents, and if the petitioner may contribute materially to the disposition of the proceedings and his/her interest is not adequately represented by existing parties. Once admitted, a petitioner is a party for the purpose of all subsequent proceedings.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-4478

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

QUENTIN VIRGIL WILLIAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior

District Judge. (1:03-cr-00024-WLO)

Submitted: November 17, 2006 Decided: December 13, 2006

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, John A. Dusenbury,

Jr., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina,

for Appellant. Angela Hewlett Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Following a hearing at which Quentin Virgil Williams

admitted to violating conditions of his supervised release, the

district court revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to

twenty-four months in prison. Williams appealed. His attorney has

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 366 U.S. 738

(1967), asserting his opinion that there are no meritorious grounds

for appeal but raising the issue of whether the district court

erred in imposing a twenty-four month sentence. The Government did

not file a reply brief, and although advised of his right to do so,

Williams did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Finding no

reversible error, we affirm.

We recently held in United States v. Crudup, 461 F.3d 433

(4th Cir. 2006), that we review sentences imposed upon the

revocation of supervised release to determine whether the sentence

is “plainly unreasonable.” In this case, Williams’s sentence was

not above the statutory maximum of two years of imprisonment, the

court considered the Chapter 7 advisory policy statement range, and

the court stated a proper basis for sentencing Williams to twentyfour months of imprisonment. See Crudup, 461 F.3d at 437.

Specifically the court noted Williams’s poor adjustment to

supervised release and his repeated violations. Because Williams’s

sentence was neither procedurally nor substantively unreasonable,

we find that his sentence is not plainly unreasonable.
- 3 -

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the record in

this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We

therefore affirm. This court requires that counsel inform

Williams, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of

the United States for further review. If Williams requests that a

petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would

be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to

withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a

copy thereof was served on Williams. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately set

forth in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

GEORGE DANIEL ESTEVES

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 556

[ April 30 , 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I. Bober

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 95

- 769CF10A

.

George Daniel Esteves, Orlando, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, F ORST and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IV

House Calendar No. 52

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 189

[Report No. 107–136]

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 36) proposing

an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing

the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the

United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 12 (legislative day, JULY 11), 2001

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res.

36) proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the

United States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the

physical desecration of the flag of the United States.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the joint reso3 lution (H.J. Res. 36) proposing an amendment to the Con4 stitution of the United States authorizing the Congress

5 to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the
2

HRES 189 RH

1 United States. The joint resolution shall be considered as

2 read for amendment. The previous question shall be con3 sidered as ordered on the joint resolution and any amend4 ment thereto to final passage without intervening motion

5 except: (1) two hours of debate equally divided and con6 trolled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

7 the Committee on the Judiciary; (2) an amendment in the

8 nature of a substitute, if offered by Representative Con9 yers of Michigan or his designee, which shall be considered

10 as read and shall be separately debatable for one hour

11 equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an

12 opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without

13 instructions.

House Calendar No. 52

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 189

[Report No. 107–136]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution

(H.J. Res. 36) proposing an amendment to theConstitution of the United States authorizing theCongress to prohibit the physical desecration ofthe flag of the United States.

JULY 12 (legislative day, JULY 11), 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1292.html[7/22/2015 9:54:17 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-3zo0

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1292

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Sheryl Moriarty

Address:

9105 w. H Abernathy hwy

Spartanburg, SC, 29301

Email: Sherylmoriarty@yahoo.com

Phone: 8645741260

General Comment

I can plan for my own retirement. Do not restrict how I can use my own money that I have saved. That is

 absolutely none of the governments concern or jurisdiction.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 859 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 859

  To amend section 203 of the National Housing Act to reduce the down 
  payment required by a first-time homebuyer purchasing a home with a 
                  mortgage insured under such section.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2001

 Mr. LaFalce introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend section 203 of the National Housing Act to reduce the down 
  payment required by a first-time homebuyer purchasing a home with a 
                  mortgage insured under such section.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FHA First-Time Homebuyer Act''.

SEC. 2. REDUCED DOWNPAYMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 203(b)(10) of the National Housing Act (12 
U.S.C. 1709(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C); 
        and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new 
        subparagraph:
                    ``(B) Reduced closing costs for first-time 
                homebuyers.--In the case of any mortgage for which the 
                mortgagor is a first-time homebuyer who has completed a 
                counseling program described in subsection (c)(2)(A), 
                the amount of the mortgage premium paid at the time the 
                mortgage is insured shall be considered to be, for 
                purposes of subparagraph (A)(i), the maximum premium 
                amount authorized to be established under the first 
                sentence of subparagraph (A) of subsection (c)(2).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### §§ 28.171-28.999 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.407 What conditions must a motor carrier satisfy for FMCSA to issue a safety permit? ( a ) *Motor carrier safety performance.* ( 1 ) The motor carrier must have a “Satisfactory” safety rating assigned by either FMCSA, pursuant to the Safety Fitness Procedures of this part, or the State in which the motor carrier has its principal place of business, if the State has adopted and implemented safety fitness procedures that are equivalent to the procedures in subpart A of this part; and
( 2 ) FMCSA will not issue a safety permit to a motor carrier that: ( i ) Does not certify that it has a satisfactory security program as required in § 385.407(b);
( ii ) Has a crash rate in the top 30 percent of the national average as indicated in the FMCSA Motor Carrier Management Information System (MCMIS); or
( iii ) Has a driver, vehicle, hazardous materials, or total out-of-service rate in the top 30 percent of the national average as indicated in the MCMIS.
( b ) *Satisfactory security program.* The motor carrier must certify that it has a satisfactory security program, including: ( 1 ) A security plan meeting the requirements of part 172, subpart I of this title, and addressing how the carrier will ensure the security of the written route plan required by this part;
( 2 ) A communications plan that allows for contact between the commercial motor vehicle operator and the motor carrier to meet the periodic contact requirements in § 385.415(c)(1); and
( 3 ) Successful completion by all hazmat employees of the security training required in § 172.704(a)(4) and (a)(5) of this title.
( c ) *Registration with the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA).* The motor carrier must be registered with the PHMSA in accordance with part 107, subpart G of this title.
[69 FR 39367, June 30, 2004, as amended at 75 FR 17241, Apr. 5, 2010; 77 FR 28450, May 14, 2012; 78 FR 58481, Sept. 24, 2013]
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 that to the best of her knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Union Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union Bankshares,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


/s/ Marsha A. Mongeon
---------------------
Marsha A. Mongeon
Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.301 What is a motor carrier required to do before beginning interstate operations? ( a ) Before a motor carrier of property or passengers begins interstate operations, it must register with FMCSA and receive a USDOT Number. In addition, for-hire motor carriers must obtain operating authority from FMCSA, unless exclusively providing transportation exempt from the commercial registration requirements in 49 U.S.C. chapter 139. Both the USDOT Number and operating authority are obtained by following registration procedures described in 49 CFR part 390, subpart E. Part 365 of this chapter provides detailed instructions for obtaining operating authority.
( b ) This subpart applies to motor carriers domiciled in the United States and Canada.
( c ) The regulations in this subpart do not apply to a Mexico-domiciled motor carrier. A Mexico-domiciled motor carrier of property or passengers must register with FMCSA by following the registration procedures described in 49 CFR parts 365, 368 and 390. Parts 365 (for long-haul carriers) and 368 (for commercial zone carriers) of this chapter provide detailed information about how a Mexico-domiciled motor carrier may obtain operating authority.
[80 FR 63707, Oct. 21, 2015] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 82 FR 5304, Jan. 17, 2017, § 385.301 was suspended, effective Jan. 14, 2017.
Exhibit 99.3



Statement  Furnished  Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The  undersigned,  Robert C. Shreve,  Jr., is the President and Chief  Executive
Officer of Avatar Systems Inc. (the "Company").


This statement is being  furnished in connection  with the filing by the Company
of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
2003. (the "Report").


By execution of this statement, I certify that:

         (A)      the report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a)  or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C 78m(a) or 78o(d) and

         (B)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations  of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.


This  statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that
this  statement  will  accompany  the Report at such time as the Report is filed
with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission,  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the  Securities  Act of 1934, as
amended.

                                                       AVATAR SYSTEMS, INC.

Dated: May 14, 2003                                 By: /s/ROBERT C. SHREVE, JR.
                                                       -------------------------

                                                         Robert C. Shreve, Jr.
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1314.html[7/22/2015 10:22:12 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvf-blmc

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1314

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Mark E. Berger

General Comment

Leave my401K and IRA alone! I can handle it.