alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 848

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the provision

that reduces primary insurance amounts for individuals receiving pensions from noncovered employment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 2001

Mr. SANDLIN (for himself, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. BALDACCI, Ms.

BALDWIN, Mr. BARCIA, Mr. CARSON of Oklahoma, Mr. CLEMENT, Mr.

COSTELLO, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. FILNER, Mr. FRANK, Mr. FROST, Ms.

HOOLEY of Oregon, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. OLVER, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. PAUL, Mr. QUINN,

Mr. RAHALL, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. WU, and Mr. BROWN of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways

and Means

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate

the provision that reduces primary insurance amounts

for individuals receiving pensions from noncovered employment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Bene5 fits Restoration Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 848 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF PROVISION THAT REDUCES PRI2 MARY INSURANCE AMOUNTS FOR INDIVID3 UALS RECEIVING PENSIONS FROM NON4 COVERED EMPLOYMENT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 215(a) of the Social Secu6 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 415(a)) is amended by striking para7 graph (7).

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

9 (1) Section 215(d) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

10 415(d)) is amended by striking paragraph (3).

11 (2) Section 215(f) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

12 415(f)) is amended by striking paragraph (9).

13 (3) Subsections (e)(2) and (f)(3) of section 202

14 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 402(e)(2), (f)(3)) are each

15 amended by striking ‘‘section 215(f)(5), 215(f)(6),

16 or 215(f)(9)(B)’’ each place it appears and inserting

17 ‘‘paragraph (5) or (6) of section 215(f)’’.

18 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

19 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with

20 respect to benefits payable for months after December

21 2001, and the Commissioner of Social Security shall re22 compute primary insurance amounts (notwithstanding

23 section 215(f) of the Social Security Act) to the extent

24 necessary to carry out such amendments.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Chyron Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Kieliszak, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 31, 2006
#### § 29.208 What happens once the Department accepts the Tribe's final offer or the final offer is accepted by operation of law?

Once the Department accepts the Tribe's final offer or the final offer is accepted by operation of law, the Department must add the terms of the Tribe's accepted final offer to the compact, funding agreement, or amendment, and transfer funds consistent with §§ 29.403 through 29.405.
1210-AB32-2-1293.html[7/24/2015 10:27:43 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvv-nprc

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1788

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: James Cooper

General Comment

I'm in control of my future and my retirement. The government is to serve for the people, not what they want for

 the people, it is our money and we should have 100% control over how we use it!
Exhibit 35.2


COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


OF


THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY, AS SERVICER


The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the duly elected and acting Vice President and Treasurer of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, as servicer (the “ Servicer ”) under the Phase-In-Recovery Property Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2013 (the “ Servicing Agreement ”), between the Servicer and CEI Funding LLC, as Bond Issuer, and further certifies on behalf of the Servicer that:


1. A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement during the period that commenced January 1, 2021 and ended December 31, 2021 has been made under the supervision of the undersigned pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Servicing Agreement; and


2. To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Servicing Agreement throughout the period that commenced January 1, 2021 and ended December 31, 2021.


Executed as of this 25th day of March 2022.





THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANYBy:/s/ Steven R. StaubName:Steven R. StaubTitle:Vice President and Treasurer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6682

BO ANDERSON TAYLOR, a/k/a Bo A. Taylor, Plaintiff – Appellant,

v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Horry County DSS, Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (4:09-cv-00455-HMH)

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: July 1, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bo Anderson Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Bo Anderson Taylor appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing Anderson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Taylor v. South Carolina Dep’t of Soc. Serv. , No. 4:09- cv-00455-HMH (D.S.C. Mar. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 372.215 Ravenswood, WV. The zone adjacent to, and commercially a part of Ravenswood, W. Va., within which transportation by motor vehicle in interstate or foreign commerce, not under common control, management, or arrangement for a continuous carriage or shipment to or from a point beyond such zone, is partially exempt from regulation under 49 U.S.C. 13506(b)(1) includes and is comprised of all points as follows: ( a ) The municipality of Ravenswood, W. Va., itself;
( b ) All points within a line drawn 4 miles beyond the municipal limits of Ravenswood;
( c ) Those points in Jackson County, W. Va., which are not within the area described in paragraph (b) of this section, and which are north of U.S. Highway 33;
( d ) All of any municipality any part of which is within the limits of the combined areas defined in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, and
( e ) All of any municipality wholly surrounded, or so surrounded except for a water boundary, by the municipality of Ravenswood or by any other municipality included under the terms of paragraph (d) of this section.
[41 FR 56654, Dec. 29, 1976, as amended at 62 FR 15422, Apr. 1, 1997]
§ 218.53 Scope and definitions. ( a ) This subpart establishes standards of conduct for railroads and individuals who operate or permit to be operated locomotives equipped with one or more of the safety devices identified in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) *Disable* means to unlawfully render a device incapable of proper and effective action or to materially impair the functioning of that device.
( c ) *Safety Device* means any locomotive-mounted equipment used either to assure the locomotive engineer is alert, not physically incapacitated, and aware of and complying with the indications of a signal system or other operational control system, or a system used to record data concerning the operations of that locomotive or the train it is powering. See appendix C to this part for a statement of agency policy on this subject.
( d ) The provisions in §§ 218.59 and 218.61 do not apply to locomotive-mounted image or audio recording equipment on freight locomotives.
[54 FR 5492, Feb. 3, 1989, as amended at 88 FR 70760, Oct. 12, 2023]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Plumas County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will hold a meeting on September 21, 2007, in Quincy, CA. The purpose of the meeting is to review applications for Cycle 7 funding and select projects to be recommended to the Plumas or Lassen National Forest Supervisor for calendar year 2008 funding consideration. The funding is available under the Title II provisions of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000.

*Date & Address:*                         The meeting will take place from 9-4 at the Mineral Building-Plumas/Sierra County Fairgrounds, 208 Fairgrounds Road, Quincy, CA.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Or for special Lee Anne Schramel Taylor, Forest Coordinator, USDA, Plumas National Forest, P.O. Box 11500/159 Lawrence Street, Quincy, CA 95971; (530) 283-7850; or by e-mail                         *eataylor@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Agenda items for the September 21 meeting include: (1) Forest Service Update; (2) Future Legislation Potential; and (3) Recommendations for funding distribution, potentially including current Cycle 6 projects not yet approved. The meetings are open to the public and individuals may address the Committee after being recognized by the Chair. Other RAC information including previous meeting agendas and minutes                           ( print page 53988)                        may be obtained at                     *http://www.fs.fed.us/​payments.*

Dated: September 13, 2007.

Fred J. Krueger,

Public Services Staff Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-4661  Filed 9-20-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Order entered January 31, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01384-CR

CHARLES EDWARD PHINISEE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-70249-H

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On January 10, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the 

clerk’s and reporter’s records had not been filed. On January 28, 2014, we received the clerk’s 

record and on January 30, 2014, we received the reporter’s record. Therefore, in the interest of 

expediting the appeal, we VACATE the January 10, 2014 order requiring findings.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0591.html[7/20/2015 9:36:29 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-t23x

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0591

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: wade abt

General Comment

I see no reason besides government wanting to over reach like usual for any regulations or restrictions should be

 put on how I spend or use my 401k. It is my money I put into a retirement fund for me and the government has

 zero rights to tell me how I can use it. Before telling millions if Americans how they can or can not spend their

 own money that they planned and put back for them maybe you should figure out how to stop spending so much

 money this nation doesn't have and pay back the 18 trillion in national debt that I did not give permission to

 spend. And when you figure out how to pay that back and have zero national debt you still have zero rights to

 tell hard working FREE Americans how they might spend what THEY earned.
<PAGE>   1
                                                               EXHIBIT 13(a)iii


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

for the years ended November 30, 1997, 1996 and 1995   (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS
EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

===============================================================================
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Restated      Restated
                                               1997        1996          1995
===============================================================================
<S>                                         <C>          <C>          <C>
Net sales ............................      $394,264     $372,382      $330,110
Cost of sales ........................       273,702      263,597       234,452
                                            -----------------------------------
      Gross profit ...................       120,562      108,785        95,658
Selling and administrative expenses ..        73,166       66,189        56,930
Merger-related costs .................         2,972           --            --
                                            -----------------------------------
      Operating profit ...............        44,424       42,596        38,728
                                            -----------------------------------
Other income (expense):
   Interest expense ..................        (2,759)      (3,822)       (3,418)
   Interest and dividend income ......         1,020        1,132         1,104
   Gain on sale of marketable 
     securities ......................         1,706        1,675            -- 
   Other, net ........................          (199)        (176)          217
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                (232)      (1,191)       (2,097)
                                            -----------------------------------
      Earnings before income taxes
         and minority interests ......        44,192       41,405        36,631
Provision for income taxes ...........        17,164       15,315        13,060
                                            -----------------------------------
      Earnings before 
         minority interests ..........        27,028       26,090        23,571
Minority interests in earnings 
   of subsidiaries ...................          (110)        (145)          (71)
                                            -----------------------------------
Net earnings .........................       $26,918      $25,945       $23,500
                                            ===================================

Net earnings per common share ........         $1.67        $1.63         $1.48
                                            ===================================
</TABLE>


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.


22
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM – Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management D istrict

Rule No(s): N/A Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Adopted Septembe r 19, 2006

Rule Title(s): Federal Negative Declarations for 5 1 Source Categories

Date Submitted to ARB: 10/18/2006

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): N/A

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Karen K. Nowak Phone Number: (760) 245-1661 x6810 E-mail Address: k2nowak@mdaqmd.ca.gov

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

The FNDs were adopted to officially show that no so urces of the named types are present within the Ant elope

Valley Air Quality Management District (AVAQMD).

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when imp lemented, will result in quantifiable changes in em issions. Attach reference(s) for emission

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculatio n sheet showing how the emission information provid ed below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Sourc e Category: N/A

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissio ns: N/A Area Affected: N/A

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measu re: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the C ontrol Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluati on Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emis sion forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Source s Affected by this Amendment: N/A

Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A %

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: N/A Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Cont inuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) N/A of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Re ductions are: N/A

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): N/A Work Practice Standards in Section(s): N/A

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): N/A Reporting Requirements in Section(s): N/A5/1/2002 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 3

(Electronic Format)

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: N/A
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 60772

In re: SHAWN BURTON ,
Movant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:15

- CV

- 724

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Shawn Burton, Mississippi prisoner # 82975, has filed a request for a certificate of appealability (COA), which we construe as a notice of appeal from the district court’s order transferring Burton’s sec ond 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas applica tion to this court , pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 , and as a motion seeking authorization to file a successive § 2254 application.
The district court transferred Burton’s § 2254 application challenging his robbery conviction to this court for a determination whether a successive application should be allowed. Burton has not met the requirements for filing a successive § 2254 application

. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b )

. Accordingly , leave to file a successive application is DENIED, and the transfer order is AFFIRMED. Burton’s motion for a COA is DENIED as

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 21, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-60772 Document: 00513351824 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/21/2016No. 15

- 60772

2 unnecessary. See United States v. Fulton , 780 F.3d 683, 688 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied , 1 36 S. Ct. 431 (2015). Case: 15-60772 Document: 00513351824 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/21/2016
1210-AB32-2-1108.html[7/24/2015 5:52:33 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-y46n

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1602

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Kathy Owen

General Comment

I can take care of my own retirement plan. Don't need anyone messing around with my stuff!!
-----Original Message----- 

From: davidlaing@aol.com [mailto:davidlaing@aol.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:32 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

David Laing 

12 Cape Jellison Rd 

Stockton Springs, ME 04981