alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 222.55 How are new supplementary or alternative safety measures approved? ( a ) The Associate Administrator may add new SSMs and standards to appendix A of this part and new ASMs and standards to appendix B of this part when the Associate Administrator determines that such measures or standards are an effective substitute for the locomotive horn in the prevention of collisions and casualties at public highway-rail grade crossings.
( b ) Interested parties may apply for approval from the Associate Administrator to demonstrate proposed new SSMs or ASMs to determine whether they are effective substitutes for the locomotive horn in the prevention of collisions and casualties at public highway-rail grade crossings.
( c ) The Associate Administrator may, after notice and opportunity for comment, order railroad carriers operating over a public highway-rail grade crossing or crossings to temporarily cease the sounding of locomotive horns at such crossings to demonstrate proposed new SSMs or ASMs, provided that such proposed new SSMs or ASMs have been subject to prior testing and evaluation. In issuing such order, the Associate Administrator may impose any conditions or limitations on such use of the proposed new SSMs or ASMs which the Associate Administrator deems necessary in order to provide the level of safety at least equivalent to that provided by the locomotive horn.
( d ) Upon completion of a demonstration of proposed new SSMs or ASMs, interested parties may apply to the Associate Administrator for their approval. Applications for approval shall be in writing and shall include the following: ( 1 ) The name and address of the applicant;
( 2 ) A description and design of the proposed new SSM or ASM;
( 3 ) A description and results of the demonstration project in which the proposed SSMs or ASMs were tested;
( 4 ) Estimated costs of the proposed new SSM or ASM; and
( 5 ) Any other information deemed necessary.
( e ) If the Associate Administrator is satisfied that the proposed safety measure fully compensates for the absence of the warning provided by the locomotive horn, the Associate Administrator will approve its use as an SSM to be used in the same manner as the measures listed in appendix A of this part, or the Associate Administrator may approve its use as an ASM to be used in the same manner as the measures listed in appendix B of this part. The Associate Administrator may impose any conditions or limitations on use of the SSMs or ASMs which the Associate Administrator deems necessary in order to provide the level of safety at least equivalent to that provided by the locomotive horn.
( f ) If the Associate Administrator approves a new SSM or ASM, the Associate Administrator will: Notify the applicant, if any; publish notice of such action in the Federal Register; and add the measure to the list of approved SSMs or ASMs.
( g ) A public authority or other interested party may appeal to the Administrator from a decision by the Associate Administrator granting or denying an application for approval of a proposed SSM or ASM, or the conditions or limitations imposed on its use, in accordance with § 222.57 of this part.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 111 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         April 4, 2001.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 8) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to phase out the estate and 
gift taxes over a 10-year period, and for other purposes. The bill shall be 
considered as read for amendment. The amendment recommended by the Committee on 
Ways and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on 
any further amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways 
and Means; (2) the further amendment printed in the report of the Committee on 
Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by Representative Rangel of New 
York or his designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any point 
of order, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 39.101 What are the requirements for providing Complaints Resolution Officials? ( a ) As a PVO, you must designate one or more Complaints Resolution Officials (CROs).
( b ) You must make a CRO available for contact on each vessel and at each terminal that you serve. The CRO may be made available in person or via telephone, if at no cost to the passenger. If a telephone link to the CRO is used, TTY or TRS service must be available so that persons with hearing impairments may readily communicate with the CRO. You must make CRO service available in the language(s) in which you make your other services available to the general public.
( c ) You must make passengers with a disability aware of the availability of a CRO and how to contact the CRO in the following circumstances: ( 1 ) In any situation in which any person complains or raises a concern with your personnel about discrimination, policies, or services with respect to passengers with a disability, and your personnel do not immediately resolve the issue to the customer's satisfaction or provide a requested accommodation, your personnel must immediately inform the passenger of the right to contact a CRO and the location and/or phone number of the CRO available on the vessel or at the terminal. Your personnel must provide this information to the passenger in a format he or she can use.
( 2 ) Your reservation agents, contractors, and Web sites must provide information equivalent to that required by paragraph (c)(1) of this section to passengers with a disability using those services.
( d ) Each CRO must be thoroughly familiar with the requirements of this Part and the PVO's procedures with respect to passengers with a disability. The CRO is intended to be the PVO's “expert” in compliance with the requirements of this Part.
( e ) You must ensure that each of your CROs has the authority to make dispositive resolution of complaints on behalf of the PVO. This means that the CRO must have the power to overrule the decision of any other personnel, except that the CRO may not be given authority to countermand a decision of the master of a vessel with respect to safety matters.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 28, 1995 (122), Para 122.33 Deletions of Sponsors from Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1467]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.122.33  deletions of sponsors from public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were deleted from public bills 
and resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 497: Mr. Saxton.
       H.R. 2072: Mr. Fox.
       H.R. 2275: Mr. Martinez.
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 18, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 53409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4653]



[[Page 53407]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part VI





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Presidential Determination No. 2007-32 of September 13, 2007--
Continuation of the Exercise of Certain Authorities Under the Trading 
With the Enemy Act


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 18, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 53409]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2007-32 of September 13, 
                2007

                
Continuation of the Exercise of Certain 
                Authorities Under the Trading With the Enemy Act

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the 
                Secretary of the Treasury

                Under section 101(b) of Public Law 95-223 (91 Stat. 
                1625; 50 U.S.C. App. 5(b) note), and a previous 
                determination on September 13, 2006 (71 Fed. Reg. 
                54399), the exercise of certain authorities under the 
                Trading With the Enemy Act is scheduled to terminate on 
                September 14, 2007.

                I hereby determine that the continuation for 1 year of 
                the exercise of those authorities with respect to the 
                applicable countries is in the national interest of the 
                United States.

                Therefore, consistent with the authority vested in me 
                by section 101(b) of Public Law 95-223, I continue for 
                1 year, until September 14, 2008, the exercise of those 
                authorities with respect to countries affected by:

                    (1) the Foreign Assets Control Regulations, 31 
                C.F.R. part 500;
                    (2) the Transaction Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. 
                part 505; and
                    (3) the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. 
                part 515.

                The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and 
                directed to publish this determination in the Federal 
                Register. 
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, September 13, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-4653
Filed 9-17-07; 10:43 am]
Billing code 4811-33-M
Editorial Note on Part 393
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 393.9 Lamps operable, prohibition of obstructions of lamps and reflectors. ( a ) All lamps required by this subpart shall be capable of being operated at all times. This paragraph shall not be construed to require that any auxiliary or additional lamp be capable of operating at all times.
( b ) Lamps and reflective devices/material required by this subpart must not be obscured by the tailboard, or by any part of the load, or its covering by dirt, or other added vehicle or work equipment, or otherwise. Exception: The conspicuity treatments on the front end protection devices may be obscured by part of the load being transported.
[70 FR 48027, Aug. 15, 2005]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1411.html[7/23/2015 9:32:43 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvn-y4wj

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1411

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I want to retain control of my retirement accounts.
March 20, 2006

To: Aurora Gold Corporation
30 Ledger Road,
Balcatta, Western Australia, 6021 Australia

Tel. 604-687-4432
Fax  604-687-4709

Attention: Cameron Richardson
Email: c.richardson@telus.net
       ----------------------


From: Tomas Almeida, Certified Translator

Re: Translation of Option Agreement regarding Sao Joao Project



                            Translator's Declaration

I,  Tomas  Almeida,  Certified  Portuguese to English Translator, Member in good
standing  of  the  Society  of  Translators and Interpreters of British Columbia
(STIBC),  which  is  a  member  association  of  the  Canadian  Translators  and
Interpreters Council (CTIC), hereby attest that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, the above-mentioned document is a true, correct and complete translation
of  the  Portuguese  document  presented  to  me.


Tomas Almeida



Tomas Almeida
19780 Honeydew Drive
Pitt Meadows, BC V3Y 2S6

Tel. 604-465-6128
Fax 604-465-6129
Cell.604-202-0031
Email: talmeida@telus.net
       ------------------
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wntteb ~tate5 <{ourt of ~peaI5

for tbe jfeberaI <{treutt

MEADWESTVACO CORPORATION AND

MEADWESTVACO CALMAR, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

REXAM BEAUTY AND CLOSURES, INC. AND

REXAM DISPENSING SYSTEMS S.A.S.,

Defendants-Appellants,

AND

VALOIS OF AMERICA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant,

AND

VALOIS S.A.S.,

Defendant.

2012-1518, -1527

Appeals from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Virginia in case no. 10-CV-0511,

Judge Gerald Bruce Lee.

Case: 12-1518 Document: 33 Page: 1 Filed: 09/25/2012
MEADWESTVACO CORPORATION v. REXAM BEAUTY

MEADWESTVACO CORPORATION AND

MEADWESTVACO CALMAR, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

REXAM BEAUTY AND CLOSURES, INC. AND

REXAM DISPENSING SYSTEMS S.A.S.,

Defendants-Appellees,

AND

VALOIS OF AMERICA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

VALOIS S.A.S.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2012-1528

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Virginia in case no. 10-CV-0511,

Judge Gerald Bruce Lee.

ON MOTION

ORDER

2

Case: 12-1518 Document: 33 Page: 2 Filed: 09/25/2012
3 MEADWESTVACO CORPORATION v. REXAM BEAUTY

Upon consideration of MeadWestVaco Corporation's

and MeadWestVaco Calmar, Inc.'s unopposed motion to

dismiss appeal no. 2012-1528,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss appeal no. 2012-1528 is

granted. Each side shall bear its own costs in 2012-1528.

(2) The revised official caption in 2012-1518, -1527 is

reflected above.

SEP 25 2012

Date

cc: Adam Phillip Samansky, Esq.

Constantine L. Trela, Jr., Esq.

Gene Stanley Winter, Esq.

s26

For The Court

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

Issued As A Mandate (as to 12-1528 only): _S_E_P_2_5_20_1_2

u.s. COURf~~i~PEALS FOR THE FEDERAl. CIRCUIT

SEP 25 ~U1L

JAN HORBALY

CLERK

Case: 12-1518 Document: 33 Page: 3 Filed: 09/25/2012
-----Original Message----- 

From: morsel@missouri.edu [mailto:morsel@missouri.edu] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 11:32 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Leona Ruth Morse 

908 Hardin Street 

Columbia, MO 65203
###### Editorial Note on Part 384

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 384 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 384.409 Notification of noncompliance.

If FMCSA determines that a State is not in substantial compliance with § 384.209, or if FMCSA issues a decertification order prohibiting a State from issuing commercial driver's licenses, FMCSA will notify commercial learner's permit and commercial driver's license holders of these actions by publication of a Federal Register notice. The notification will advise commercial learner's permit and commercial driver's license holders that they must comply with the self-reporting requirements of § 383.31(a) with respect to convictions obtained in that State until such time that FMCSA determines the State to be in substantial compliance.

[78 FR 24688, Apr. 26, 2013]
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–349 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT 

TO THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES COMMITTEE 

DECEMBER 16 (legislative day, DECEMBER 15), 2005.—Referred to the House 

Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. PUTNAM, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 620] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 620, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The resolution applies the waiver to any special 

rule reported on the legislative day of December 16, 2005 or December 17, 2005. 

Æ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MANUEL AGUILAR-GODINEZ, AKA

Guillermo Govea-Pena, AKA Guillermo

Guvea,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-10519

D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00570-GEB-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Garland E. Burrell, Jr., Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 11, 2015** 

San Francisco California

Before: McKEOWN, MURGUIA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Manuel Aguilar-Godinez pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess a

chemical to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and

FILED

MAR 13 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
841(c)(2). The district court applied two sentencing enhancements that AguilarGodinez now challenges on appeal. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss the appeal. As

part of his plea agreement, Aguilar-Godinez waived the “right to appeal any aspect

of the sentence imposed in this case.” Aguilar-Godinez entered into the plea deal

knowingly and voluntarily and stated that he understood the terms. United States

v. Joyce, 357 F.3d 921, 922 (9th Cir. 2004) (“A defendant’s waiver of his appellate

rights is enforceable if the language of the waiver encompasses his right to appeal

on the grounds raised, and if the waiver was knowingly and voluntarily made.”).

Aguilar-Godinez argues that the sentencing enhancements nevertheless must

be vacated, because the district court violated Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(1) by failing

to address the defendant personally regarding the plea terms. Applying plain-error

review, we disagree. See United States v. Ma, 290 F.3d 1002, 1005 (9th Cir.

2002). The district court asked the prosecutor to summarize the terms of the plea

agreement—including the waiver of appeal rights—and personally addressed

Aguilar-Godinez to confirm that he understood those terms. Id.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11008 and #11009]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Oklahoma (FEMA-1718-DR), dated 08/24/2007.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, and Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         08/18/2007 through 09/12/2007.                    

*Effective Date:*                         09/17/2007.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadlne Date:*                         10/23/2007.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/26/2008.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of Oklahoma, dated 08/24/2007 is hereby amended to include the                           ( print page 54092)                        following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:                

*Primary Counties:*                     Canadian, Cleveland, Comanche, Custer, Grady, Kiowa, Okfuskee, Oklahoma, Okmulgee, Pottawatomie, Seminole, Stephens.                

*Contiguous Counties:*                     Oklahoma: Beckham, Carter, Cotton, Creek, Garvin, Greer, Huges, Jackson, Jefferson, Lincoln, McClain, McIntosh, Muskogee, Pontotoc, Roger Mills, Tillman, Tulsa, Wagoner.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Roger B. Garland,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 07-4691  Filed 9-20-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.301T What is a motor carrier required to do before beginning interstate operations? ( a ) Before a motor carrier of property or passengers begins interstate operations, it must register with the FMCSA and receive a USDOT number. In addition, for-hire motor carriers must obtain operating authority from FMCSA following the registration procedures described in 49 CFR part 365, unless providing transportation exempt from 49 CFR part 365 registration requirements.
( b ) This subpart applies to motor carriers domiciled in the United States and Canada.
( c ) A Mexico-domiciled motor carrier of property or passengers must register with the FMCSA by following the registration procedures described in 49 CFR part 365 or 368, as appropriate. The regulations in this subpart do not apply to Mexico-domiciled carriers.
[82 FR 5304, Jan. 17, 2017]
----- F o r

w ar d e d b y Br i a n Sh ra g

e r / R T P/ U S E P A / U S o n 02 / 18 / 2011 0 3:1 1 P M

---- -

F r o m : Br i a n Sh ra g

e r / R T P / U S E P A / U S T o : " Hig

g i n s , C o r t n ey " < C

o r t n ey_ H i g

g i n s @ o m b

. e o p .g

o v> D a t e : 02 / 01 / 201 1 03 : 12 P M Sub j e ct : C o s t / E R / S e c o nd ar y I m p a ct s M e m o [ a pp x

2 o f 4 ]

C o r t n ey ,

2 nd o f 4 e

- m a il s w

i t h t h e a pp e nd i c

e s t o t h e I m p a ct

s m e m o

.

T h a n ks!

Br i a n

( S ee a tt a c h e d f il e : A

- 5

. x l sx)( S ee a tt a c h e d f il e : A

- 4

. x l sx )