alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.9

Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Report on Form 10-K of Exelon Generation Company, LLC for the year ended
December 31, 2002, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information
contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Exelon Generation Company, LLC.

|Date: March 21, 2003 |  | /s/ROBERT S. SHAPARDRobert S. Shapard
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Exelon Corporation
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified in its' entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            4,025,400
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4,025,400
<PP&E>                                           42,915,672
<DEPRECIATION>                                   14,120,641
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   39,443,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               509,790
<BONDS>                                           7,713,863
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                       31,220,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     39,443,860
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  7,711,086
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,466,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  669,113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3,772,309
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3,772,309
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3,772,309
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         41.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7908

GEORGE SMITH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DOUG MITCHELL, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-02-227-1-MU)

Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 22, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

George Smith, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in

a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000).

When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely

on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not

issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists

of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a

valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that

jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district

court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000)), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the

requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029

(2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 24-12



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Richard L. Thomas do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange
Commission report on Form 10-K for 2004 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully
and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



/S/    RICHARD L. THOMASRichard L. Thomas




DATE:
February 21, 2005
#### Attorney-General *v.*Continental Life Insurance Company.

Order reversed, without costs. Opinion by

Brady, J.
07/16/2015 Kennett Warren

I strongly oppose the DOL's proposed fiduciary standard for advisors. If advisors are held to this standard, every American worker 

should be held to this standard, including our political leaders and our physicians! A standard like this will provide little to no benefit 

and lead to much higher costs for financial institutions and investors. There is way too much government intervention and regulation in 

our country. It needs to stop!
#### Lewis Brownell and others, Respondents. v. The National Bank of Gloversville and others, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ton dollars costs and printing disbursements.

Landon, J.. not acting.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0564.html[7/20/2015 8:59:24 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-58ko

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0564

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: paul duncan

General Comment

The indidual retirement accounts are our accounts and we do not want any government entity to dictate to me

 how or on want I spend my own money on, stay away from our retirement account.
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**




CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8 outstanding pertaining to the Stock Option plan of Coastal Caribbean Oils
      & Minerals, Ltd. of our report dated March 17, 2005 relating to our audit of
      the consolidated financial statements of Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals,
      Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, included in this Annual
      Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.





We
      also
      consent to the reference to our firm under the caption :Consent of experts
      and
      counsel” in such Annual Report.




/s/ James Moore & Co., P.L.







Gainesville,
      Florida


March
      7,
      2006
From: Kirving@sc.rr.com [mailto:Kirving@sc.rr.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:28 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

As a Registered Nurse, I have seen the devistation mental illness can 

cause individuals and families. The inability to afford care makes it 

even more difficult. Also, putting it in a separate category continues 

to make individuals feel that they are different. 

Please pass this bill. 

Sincerely, 

Karen Irving 

253 Ripley Station Rd 

Columbia, SC, SC 29212
Exhibit 10.4



 







EXHIBIT 10.4




FIRST AMENDMENT TO

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this
“Amendment”) is entered into effective as of March 27, 2006, by and between CancerVax
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Guy Gammon (“Executive”).



     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend that certain Second Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement dated as of November 15, 2004, between the Company and Executive (as amended
to date, the “Original Agreement”) on the terms and conditions set forth herein.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the various covenants and agreements hereinafter set
forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:



     1. Amendment to Section 4(g)(v). A new sentence is added at the end of Section
4(g)(v) of the Original Agreement to read as follows:



                  “Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of the Stock Awards granted to Executive on March 27,
2006 shall accelerate pursuant to clauses (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv) of this Section 4(g).”



     2. No Other Amendments. Except as expressly provided for in this Amendment, no other
term or provision of the Original Agreement is amended or modified in any respect.



(Signature Page Follows)




 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth
above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CANCERVAX CORPORATION
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ David F. Hale
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	David F. Hale
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Guy Gammon
	 	 	 
	 	 	Guy Gammon






[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECOND

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT]
**Exhibit 31.A**
**Certification**
I, Douglas L. Foshee, certify that:
1. I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of El Paso CGP Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: June 20, 2005                 /s/ Douglas L. Foshee   Douglas L. Foshee    President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 995 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 995

     To provide permanent appropriations to the Radiation Exposure 
 Compensation Trust Fund to make payments under the Radiation Exposure 
                Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2001

 Mr. McInnis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide permanent appropriations to the Radiation Exposure 
 Compensation Trust Fund to make payments under the Radiation Exposure 
                Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RADIATION EXPOSURE COMPENSATION TRUST FUND APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Paul Hicks 
Memorial Act''.
    (b) Appropriations.--There are appropriated, out of any money in 
the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2002, and each fiscal year thereafter, such sums as may 
be necessary to the Radiation Exposure Compensation Trust Fund for the 
purpose of making payments to eligible beneficiaries under the 
Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note).
                                 <all>
```
#### § 271.305 Reopened review.

Following approval of an RRP plan or an amendment to such a plan, FRA may reopen review of the plan or amendment, in whole or in part, for cause stated.
Editorial Note on Part 396
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 396 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 396.13 Driver inspection. Before driving a motor vehicle, the driver shall: ( a ) Be satisfied that the motor vehicle is in safe operating condition;
( b ) Review the last driver vehicle inspection report if required by § 396.11(a)(2)(i); and
( c ) Sign the report to acknowledge that the driver has reviewed it and that there is a certification that the required repairs have been performed. The signature requirement does not apply to listed defects on a towed unit which is no longer part of the vehicle combination.
[44 FR 76526, Dec. 27, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 55868, Dec. 16, 1983; 63 FR 33280, June 18, 1998; 85 FR 50793, Aug. 18, 2020]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 53580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4680]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

Date & Time: Monday, September 24, 2007, to be held at the Conclusion 
of the open meeting

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. This meeting will be closed 
to the public.

Items to be Discussed:

    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.
* * * * *

Date & Time: Monday, September 24, 2007, at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor)

Status: This meeting will be open to the public.

Items to be Discussed:

    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2007-13: United American Nurses, AFL-CIO, by 
counsel, Laurence Gold.
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2007-14: Associated Builders and 
Contractors, the National Federation of Independence Business and the 
National Restaurant Association by counsel, Jan Witold Baran and Carol 
A. Laham.
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2007-15: GMAC LLC, by, counsel, Jan Witold 
Baran and Caleb P. Burns.
    Report of the Audit Division on Craig Romero for Congress, Inc.
    Draft Final Rules on the Use of Campaign Funds for Donations to 
Non-Federal Candidates and Any Other Lawful Purpose Other Than Personal 
Use.
    Management and Administrative Matters.

Person to contact for information: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-4680 Filed 9-17-07; 3:19 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         52,480
<SECURITIES>                                   828,839
<RECEIVABLES>                                  52,634
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,248,233
<PP&E>                                         4,735,619
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,311,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          67,299
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,806,763
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,436,988
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,311,050
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               167,178
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,321,859
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,154,681)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,154,681)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,154,681)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.03)
        


</TABLE>
exv10w50a



 






Exhibit 10.50a




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EQUIPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT



This AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EQUIPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) in made and entered into
effective as of the 28 day of May, 2004, by and between GK FINANCING, LLC a California limited
liability company (“GKF”), and BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF EAST TENNESSEE, a Tennessee non-profit
corporation (“Hospital”), with reference to the following facts:




R E C I T A L S




     A. GKF and Hospital have entered into a certain Equipment Lease Agreement dated August 7,
2003 (the “Agreement”).



     B. Pursuant to Section 25.5 of the Agreement, GKF and Hospital desire to amend the Agreement
as provided below .



A G R E E M E N T




     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and agreements set forth
herein, and for such other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:




	 	1.	 	Governing Law, Section 25.9 is hereby deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following: “This Agreement shall be interpreted and enforced in
accordance with the internal laws, and not the law of conflicts, of the State of
Tennessee applicable to agreements made and to be performed in that State.”





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the
Effective Date.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	“GKF”:	 	 	 	 	 	“Hospital”:	 	 
	 
	GK FINANCING, LLC	 	 	 	BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF EAST TENNESSEE,	 	 
	a California limited liability company	 	 	 	a Tennessee not for profit	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Corporation	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Craig K. Tagawa
 

Craig K. Tagawa
	 	 	 	By:

Name:
	 	/s/ Stephen N. Clapp
 

Stephen N. Clapp
	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Senior Vice President
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0763.html[7/21/2015 12:12:11 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-bjpl

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0763

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I can plan for my own retirement. LEAVE MY 401K ALONE!