alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0937.html[7/21/2015 6:34:32 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-69ew

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0937

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

It's my money that I'm working hard to earn and save, I can do with it whatever I want. This is the definition of

 BIG GOVERNMENT, which is NOT what the United States of America were founded upon. Leave the hard

 working people's retirement savings alone!
#### § 554.5 Office of Defects Investigation.

The Office of Defects Investigation conducts investigations to implement the provisions of the Act concerning the identification and correction of safety-related defects in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. It elicits from every available source and evaluates on a continuing basis any information suggesting the existence of a safety-related defect.
#### § 222.38 Can a quiet zone be created in the Chicago Region?

Public authorities that are eligible to establish quiet zones under this part may create New Quiet Zones or New Partial Quiet Zones in the Chicago Region, provided the New Quiet Zone or New Partial Quiet Zone does not include any highway-rail grade crossing described in § 222.3(c) of this part.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0649.html[7/21/2015 8:02:05 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-id2x

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0649

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Kimberly Chaffee

General Comment

Please leave our 401k alone
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF **

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER **

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1. | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,                2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for                the period ending June 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                Benda Pharmaceutical, Inc. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 14, 2008                                                                  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  */s/                Eric Yu*                                                                    |
| Eric                YuCFO                and Principal Accounting Officer and                Director |

----
June
15,  2005

John W. Henry & Company,
Inc.
301 Yamato Road, Suite 2200
Boca Raton, Fl.
33431-4931

Attn: Mr.  Ken
Webster


Re: Management Agreement
Renewals


Dear Mr. Webster:

We
are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the
"Management Agreements"). We are extending
the term of the Management Agreements through June  30,
2006 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain
unchanged.

			
		• 	Shearson Mid-West Futures
Fund


			
		• 	Shearson Lehman Select Advisors
Futures Fund L.P.


			
		• 	Smith Barney Mid-West
Futures Fund L.P. II


			
		• 	Smith Barney
Westport Futures Fund L.P.


			
		• 	Hutton
Investors Futures Fund, L.P. II (HIFF
II)


			
		• 	AURORA
2001


			
		• 	AURORA
III


			
		• 	Salomon Smith Barney Diversified
2000 Futures Fund L.P.


			
		• 	Alera
100


			
		• 	JWH Strategic Allocation Master Fund
LLC


			
		• 	Citigroup Diversified Futures
Fund


Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by
signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of
Mr.  Daniel  McAuliffe at the address above or fax to
212-793-1986. If you have any questions I can be reached at
212-559-5043.

Very truly yours,

CITIGROUP
MANAGED FUTURES LLC

By: /s/ Daniel R.
McAuliffe, Jr


Daniel R. McAuliffe,
Jr.
Chief Financial Officer &
Director

JOHN W. HENRY & COMPANY,
INC.

By: /s/ Ken
Webster


Print Name: Ken
Webster


DRMcA/sr
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 9/3/15 

Received: September 03, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8kx6-l0ed

Comments Due: September 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule- Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-5136

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: David Mowbray

General Comment

I wish to comment on your proposal to eliminate (or at least heavily restrict) the use of exchange 

traded options (puts and calls) in retirement accounts. This may be well meaning on your part, 

but will result in huge unintended consequences.

A large part of my retirement portfolio is in Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRA) and I use 

puts and calls extensively in these portfolios to generate income and provide protection against 

unexpected market moves. The inability to use options would severely reduce my income and 

portfolio stability. It would require me to remove these funds into a taxable account at a large 

cost in income taxes so that I can continue to use options.

Options traders like me are extensively screened by brokers and assigned to various levels of 

risk. Most brokerages allow up to level 4, but not level 5 (naked short calls). Options traders 

know what they are doing and do not need supervision or interference from any government 

agency. In fact, many options trades are less risky that the acquisition of equities or bonds and in 

any case are always "cash covered" in that margin may not be used in these accounts. An 

example of this is selling a naked put on a stock that one wants to acquire. If the stock is selling 

for $10.00 today and the investor wants to own it, a better strategy is to sell a naked put for a 

price and date in the future in exchange for a premium. Thus, if one could sell a naked put on this 

stock three months hence for, say $9.00 for a premium of $.50 and the stock were put to the 
investor, the effective price would be $8.50 or $1.50 less than the current price. The market risk 

for the equity in terms of price movement is exactly the same.

Please delete this harmful part of this rule. If I and my fellow investors find that come 2016 we 

can no longer trade options, it is likely to be a "storming the Bastille" moment for the 

Department of Labor.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
          FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
          OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES F-2, F-3 AND F-4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K
          FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
          SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                            131,022
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,970,549
<ALLOWANCES>                      143,632
<INVENTORY>                     3,427,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                5,827,299
<PP&E>                          4,503,432
<DEPRECIATION>                  1,901,838
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  8,893,908
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           4,542,401
<BONDS>                         1,655,218
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           55,306
<OTHER-SE>                      2,384,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    8,893,908
<SALES>                        14,512,234
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               14,512,234
<CGS>                          12,099,403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   2,874,044
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                382,901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 ( 700,386)
<INCOME-TAX>                       17,413 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             ( 717,799)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                    ( 717,799)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       ( .13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       ( .13)
        

</TABLE>
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1290.html[7/22/2015 9:54:19 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-4aeq

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1290

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: David Duncan

Address:

York, SC, 29745

General Comment

To whom it may concern:

Please keep the government's hands off US citizens' personal retirement accounts, 

e.g. 401K, IRA, etc. People who are wise enough to save are wise enough to

financially manage their own futures. They earned it, should keep it, do what they

want with it (it's theirs). They do not need or want any unsolicited help managing 

their finances. 

I was fortunate enough to retire in good health after 35 continuous years working. 

In preparation of retirement, I sacrificed part of what was left after tax withholding 

from each pay check in order to contribute to my retirement through a 410K plan 

that my employer offered. Fortunately, I was able to raise and educate two children

and save and invest sufficiently to support my wife and me in retirement. And barring 

a financial disaster, like losing my savings to catastrophy such as the government 

stealing my money, we will be comfortably set for life. I did this on my own without

governmental assistance.

There is nothing in the constitution that allows government to help folks manage their

own hard earned retirement savings. People have gotten along just fine managing 

their retirement during the entire history of the US without government assistance 

and we don't want government's "help". Hands off, please.
§ 231.2 Hopper cars and high-side gondolas with fixed ends. (Cars with sides more than 36 inches above the floor are high-side cars.) ( a ) *Hand brakes* — ( 1 ) *Number.* Same as specified for “Box and other house cars” (see § 231.1(a)(1)).
( 2 ) *Dimensions.* Same as specified for “Box and other house cars” (see § 231.1(a)(2)).
( 3 ) *Location.* ( i ) Each hand brake shall be so located that it can be safely operated while car is in motion.
( ii ) The brake shaft shall be located on end of car to the left of, and not more than 22 inches from, center.
( iii ) Carriers are not required to change the brakes from right to left side on steel or steel-underframe cars with platform end sills, in service July 1, 1911, except when such appliances are renewed, at which time they must be made to comply with the standards prescribed.
( iv ) Carriers are not required to change the location of brake wheels and brake shafts on cars in service July 1, 1911, where the appliances are within 3 inches of the required location, except that when cars undergo regular repairs they must then be made to comply with the standards prescribed.
( 4 ) *Manner of application.* Same as specified for “Box and other house cars” (see § 231.1(a)(4)).
( b ) *Brake step.* Same as specified for “Box and other house cars” (see § 231.1 (b)).
( c ) *Sill steps.* Same as specified for “Box and other house cars” (see § 231.1(d)).
( d ) *Ladders* — ( 1 ) *Number.* Same as specified for “Box and other house cars” (see § 231.1(e)(1)).
( 2 ) *Dimensions.* Same as specified for “Box and other house cars” (see § 231.1(e)(2)), except that top ladder tread shall be located not more than 4 inches from top of car.
( 3 ) *Location.* Same as specified for “Box and other house cars” (see § 231.1(e)(3)).
( 4 ) *Manner of application.* Same as specified for “Box and other house cars” (see § 231.1(e)(4)).
( e ) *Side handholds.* Same as specified for “Box and other house cars” (see § 231.1(h)).
( f ) *Horizontal end handholds.* Same as specified for “Box and other house cars” (see § 231.1(i)).
( g ) *Vertical end handholds.* Same as specified for “Box and other house cars” (see § 231.1(j)).
( h ) *Uncoupling levers.* Same as specified for “Box and other house cars” (see § 231.1(k)).
( i ) *End-ladder clearance.* ( 1 ) No part of car above end sills within 30 inches from side of car, except buffer block, brake shaft, brake wheel, brake step, or uncoupling lever shall extend to within 12 inches of a vertical plane parallel with end of car and passing through the inside face of knuckle when closed with coupler horn against the buffer block or end sill, and no other part of end of car or fixtures on same above end sills, other than exceptions herein noted, shall extend beyond the outer face of buffer block.
( 2 ) Carriers are not required to make changes to secure additional end-ladder clearance on cars in service July 1, 1911, that have 10 or more inches end-ladder clearance within 30 inches of side of car, until car is shopped for work amounting to practically rebuilding body of car, at which time they must be made to comply with the standards prescribed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>          THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
                  FROM  THE   CONSOLIDATED   BALANCE  SHEETS  AND   CONSOLIDATED
                  STATEMENTS  OF  OPERATIONS  FOUND ON PAGES F-2, F-3 AND F-4 OF
                  THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED
                  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1998
<SECURITIES>                            0
<CASH>                                  281,449
<RECEIVABLES>                           1,990,476
<ALLOWANCES>                            (104,500)
<INVENTORY>                             3,157,499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        5,426,014
<PP&E>                                  4,665,178
<DEPRECIATION>                          2,561,929
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          7,680,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   2,309,238
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                55,406
<OTHER-SE>                              2,455,004
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            7,680,578
<SALES>                                 15,072,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        15,072,285
<CGS>                                   12,709,034
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           12,709,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        2,619,652
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      (340,182)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         87,420
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     87,420
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            87,420
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .02                                 
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .02       
        

</TABLE>
#### Katie Lee, Appellant, *v.*Emma Nevins, as President of the United Garment Workers of America, Local No. 34, Respondent.

*Lee*v. *Nevins,*136 App. Div. 930, affirmed.

(Submitted March 31, 1911;

decided April 25, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January *27,*1910, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint hy the court on trial at Special Term in an action to secure plaintiff’s reinstatement as a member of the defendant association.

*Alfred Stechler*and *Levin L. Brown*for appellant.

*Max D. Steuer*and *Gerald B. Rosenheim*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ.
#### § 32.210 To whom must I distribute my drug-free workplace statement?

You must require that a copy of the statement described in § 32.205 be given to each employee who will be engaged in the performance of any Federal award.
#### Hainey v. Alberry *et al., Appellants.*

Deed Acknowledged before a Party. The record of a deed acknowledged before a person *named*in the deed as party thereto, is not evidence against one who has no actual notice of the existence of the deed.

*Appeal from Cass Circuit Court.*— Hon. E. P. Wright, Judge.

Reversed.

*Tomlinson*$• *Boss*and *B. 0. Boggess*for appellants.

*W. J. Terrell*for respondent.

Norton,-J.

On the trial of this cause plaintiff offered to read in evidence a certified copy of the record of a deed dated October 25th, 1872, executed by the defendant Al-berry and wife, parties of the first part, to N. I. Thompson, party of the second part, and W. W. Oockins, party of the third part. This was objected to on the ground that the said deed was acknowledged before and certified to by said N. I. Thompson, who was a party thereto. This objection was overruled and the evidence offered was received, and it is chiefly this action of the court which is relied upon as error. Under the authority of the following cases: *Dail v. Moore,*51 Mo. 589; *Black v.*Gregg, 58 Mo. 565; *Stevens v.*Hampton, 46 Mo. 404; *Ryan v. Carr,*46 Mo. 483; 1 Wag. Stat., 277, §§ 24, 25, the court erred in admitting «aid evidence, there being no evidence in the record tending to show that the defendant, or those under whom he claimed, had actual notice of the said deed of October. 25th, 1872.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded,

in which all concur.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0648.html[7/21/2015 8:02:05 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-woy4

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0648

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I don't need the government to help me how to spend my retirement savings.
#### Same *v.*Same.

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinions by

Barnard, P. J., and Pratt, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE RELATED
FORM 10-K FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000020947
<NAME> CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    4,850,626
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    241,812
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         597,565
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     1,461,723
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,151,726
<COMMON>                                     1,241,284
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       78,624
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          (193,146)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,126,762
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          215,420
<PREFERRED>                                    240,871
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,665,981
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               5,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  146,760
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       29,714
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     85,569
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                54,634
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,581,015
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                7,151,726
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,768,737
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            93,875
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,276,963
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,370,838
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        397,899
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              31,298
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 429,197
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       245,478
<NET-INCOME>                                   183,719
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     42,444
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  141,275
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        74,213
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      231,547
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         429,938
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>