alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Viropro, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: November 11, 2003

By: /s/ Hugh Johnson

--------------------------------

Hugh Johnson, President
Exhibit 99.1

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and of Chief Financial Officer of the
Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [SECTION]1350, as adopted
pursuant to [SECTION]906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on
their knowledge and belief: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the periods covered in the Report.


                                       /s/ Kenneth D. Gibbons
                                       ----------------------
                                       Kenneth D. Gibbons
                                       Chief Executive Officer


                                       /s/ Marsha A. Mongeon
                                       ----------------------
                                       Marsha A. Mongeon
                                       Chief Financial Officer


                                       August 14, 2002
                                       ---------------
Opinion issued June 7, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00182-CR

———————————

IN RE JAWAID PARKER, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Jawaid Parker, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking an 

order compelling the trial court to (1) rule on properly and timely filed motions 

including one for a Barker1 hearing; (2) require the State to provide discovery and a 

 

1 See Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 92 S. Ct. 2182 (1972).
2

private investigator; and (3) vacate the trial court’s order granting the State’s motion 

for continuance.

2

 

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Lloyd.

 

2 The underlying proceeding is Parker v. State, cause number 1435056, in the 182nd

Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Jeannine Barr

presiding.
#### Francis X. Myers, *as Sheriff, etc., Respondent, v.*James A. Becker, *Appellant.*

Motion for Teargument denied. Leave granted to appeal to the Court of Appeals on the ground that a question of law is involved which ought to be reviewed by that court.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSoil stabilization mat for lunar launch/landing siteFacilities which are capable of handling frequent arrivals and departures of spaceships between Earth and a lunar colony are necessary. The facility must be able to provide these services with minimal interruption of operational activity within the colony. The major concerns associated with the space traffic are the dust and rock particles that will be kicked up by the rocket exhaust. As a result of the reduced gravitation of the Moon, these particles scatter over large horizontal distances. This flying debris will not only seriously interrupt the routine operations of the colony, but could cause damage to the equipment and facilities surrounding the launch site. An approach to overcome this problem is presented. A proposed design for a lunar take-off/landing mat is presented. This proposal goes beyond dealing with the usual problems of heat and load resistances associated with take-off and landing, by solving the problem of soil stabilization at the site. Through adequate stabilization, the problem of flying debris is eliminated.Document ID19900016812Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsAcord, Amy L.*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Cohenour, Mark W.*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Ephraim, Daniel*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Gochoel, Dennis*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Roberts, Jefferson G.*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1990Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186690ME-4182NAS 1.26:186690TEX-4312Accession Number90N26128Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASW-4435Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016812.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
ex10_26 US Bank Letter Agreement


    Exhibit
      10.26

    


    


    


    US
      BANK

    


    


    November
      17, 2005

    


    


    


    


    Featherlite,
      Inc.

    Highways
      63 & 9

    P
      O Box
      320

    Cresco,
      Iowa 52136

    Attentions:
      Jeffery A. Mason

    


    


    Gentlemen:

    


    


    Reference
      is hereby made to that certain Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as
      of
      July 31, 2002, by and between you and us, as amended (as so amended, the (“Loan
      Agreement”). All capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall
      have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Loan
      Agreement.

    


    This
      letter will confirm our understanding that the limitation on Capital
      Expenditures and Capitalized Leases set forth in Section 5.01(o)(iv) of the
      Loan
      Agreement shall be amended as follows: a) during Borrower’s fiscal year 2005,
      the limit shall be increased to $8,000,000.00 of which up to $5,500,000.00
      is
      related to Borrower’s repurchase of real property located in Sanford, Florida
      and b) during Borrower’s fiscal year 2006, the limit shall be up to $3,000,000.
      Indebtedness incurred by Borrower in connection with the repurchase of such
      property will be permitted by Section 5.02(a)(v) of the Loan
      Agreement.

    


    This
      letter is not and shall not be construed as an amendment or waiver of any of
      the
      other terms, provisions, conditions or covenants contained in the Loan
      Agreement.

    


    


     

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	U.S.
              BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	 	By:  	/s/ Daryl
              Hagstrom
	 	
              

            
	 	 Vice
              President
#### § 218.71 Purpose and scope.

This subpart prescribes minimum requirements governing protection of camp cars that house railroad employees. The rule does not apply to such cars while they are in a train.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 248 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       October 3, 2001.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2646) to provide for the continuation of agricultural programs 
through fiscal year 2011. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 
All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed two hours equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Agriculture. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 
under the five-minute rule. In lieu of the amendments recommended by the 
Committees on Agriculture and International Relations now printed in the bill, 
it shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 
amendment under the five-minute rule an amendment in the nature of a substitute 
consisting of the text printed in part A of the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution, modified by the amendment printed in part B of the 
report. That amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against that amendment in the nature of a substitute 
are waived. No amendment to that amendment in the nature of a substitute shall 
be in order except those printed before October 3, 2001, in the portion of the 
Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII and 
except pro forma amendments for the purpose of debate. Each amendment so printed 
may be offered only by the Member who caused it to be printed or his designee 
and shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill 
for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 
such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote 
in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill 
or to the amendment in the nature of a substitute made in order as original 
text. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1329.html[7/22/2015 10:29:39 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvg-6t3a

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1329

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Dane Bendixen

General Comment

Do not pass this rule. Americans are more than capable enough to plan their own retirement! Stop meddling in

 every aspect of our lives.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 28, 1995 (88), Para 88.49 Waiving Points of Order Against Conference Report on H.Con.Res.67]
[Page 1065]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.88.49  waiving points of order against conference report on 
          h.con.res.67

  Mr. DREIER, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. 
No. 104-165) the resolution (H. Res. 175) waiving points of order 
against the conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution (H. 
Con. Res. 67) setting forth the congressional budget for the United 
States Government for the fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2001, and 
2002.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>   THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
           FROM THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE
           STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
           REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                    482
<SECURITIES>                            2,123
<RECEIVABLES>                           8,854
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                             8,398
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       22,441
<PP&E>                                  3,516
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         34,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   4,854
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                   10
<OTHER-SE>                             30,004
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           34,868
<SALES>                                28,699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       28,699
<CGS>                                  13,637
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          13,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       10,633
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         4,524
<INCOME-TAX>                            1,719
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     2,805
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            2,805
<EPS-BASIC>                            0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.29


</TABLE>
§ 178.1000 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart prescribes requirements for Flexible Bulk Containers (FBCs) intended for the transportation of hazardous materials. FBC standards in this subpart are based on the UN Model Regulations.
( b ) Terms used in this subpart are defined in § 171.8 of this subchapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            1849
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       12
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1864
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               79
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1785
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1864
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    29
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       14
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    82
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (67)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (67)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (67)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.89)
        

</TABLE>
114 STAT. 486 PUBLIC LAW 106–233—JULY 6, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1666:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: Vol. 146 (2000):

Mar. 21, considered and passed House.

June 23, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–233

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service at 200 East Pinckney

Street in Madison, Florida, as the ‘‘Captain Colin P. Kelly, Jr. Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

200 East Pinckney Street in Madison, Florida, is hereby designated

as the ‘‘Captain Colin P. Kelly, Jr. Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference to such facility in a law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States shall be considered

to be a reference to the ‘‘Captain Colin P. Kelly, Jr. Post Office’’.

Approved July 6, 2000.

July 6, 2000

[H.R. 1666]
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLYREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March31, 2009

 

 

[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the transition period from_________to _________

 

Commission file number0-11935

 

 

CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX,LP

(Exact name of registrant asspecified in its charter)

 

 

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Address of principal executiveoffices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number,including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) hasfiled all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periodthat the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subjectto such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  

[X] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant hassubmitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, everyInteractive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (orfor such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post suchfiles). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a largeaccelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smallerreporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”,“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shellcompany (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X]No
#### § 382.215 Controlled substances testing.

No driver shall report for duty, remain on duty or perform a safety-sensitive function, if the driver tests positive or has adulterated or substituted a test specimen for controlled substances. No employer having knowledge that a driver has tested positive or has adulterated or substituted a test specimen for controlled substances shall permit the driver to perform or continue to perform safety-sensitive functions.

[66 FR 43103, Aug. 17, 2001, as amended at 77 FR 4483, Jan. 30, 2012]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. MANUEL AGUILAR-GODINEZ, AKA Guillermo Govea-Pena, AKA Guillermo Guvea, Defendant - Appellant. No. 13-10519 D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00570-GEB-1
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Garland E. Burrell, Jr., Senior District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 11, 2015 ** San Francisco California Before: McKEOWN, MURGUIA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. Manuel Aguilar-Godinez pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess a chemical to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 

# FILED
MAR 13 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).841(c)(2). The district court applied tw o sentencing enhancements that AguilarGodinez now challenges on appeal. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss the appeal. As part of his plea agreement, Aguilar-Godinez waived the “right to appeal any aspect of the sentence imposed in this case.” Aguilar-Godinez entered into the plea deal knowingly and voluntarily and stated that he understood the terms. United States v. Joyce , 357 F.3d 921, 922 (9th Cir. 2004) (“A de fendant’s waiver of his appellate rights is enforceable if the language of th e waiver encompasses his right to appeal on the grounds raised, and if the waiverwas knowingly and voluntarily made.”). Aguilar-Godinez argues that the senten cing enhancements nevertheless must be vacated, because the district court viol ated Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(1) by failing to address the defendant pe rsonally regarding the plea terms. Applying plain-error review, we disagree. See United States v. Ma , 290 F.3d 1002, 1005 (9th Cir. 2002). The district court asked the pros ecutor to summarize the terms of the plea agreement—including the waiver of a ppeal rights—and personally addressed Aguilar-Godinez to confirm that he understood those terms. Id. APPEAL DISMISSED.

2
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0699.html[7/21/2015 9:48:45 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-pgkw

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0699

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Clint Sparkomatic

General Comment

Keep your grubby governing hand off of our money!
Order entered July 26, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 17

- 00566

- CV

ERWIN CRUZ , ET AL. , Appellant s

V.

MEHRDAD GHANI, Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judici al District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 10

- 16274



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellants’ July 24, 2017 unopposed motion for an extension of time

to file a brief. We GRANT the motion. Appellants shall file a brief by September 11, 2017.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE