FORM 10-QSB--QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                        Quarterly or Transitional Report

                      U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

                   For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2000


[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-11935

                            CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX
         (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                              94-2887133
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                      (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act  during the  preceding  12 months (or for such
shorter period that the  registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No___

<PAGE>


                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

a)

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

                                   (Unaudited)

                          (in thousands, except unit data)

                                 March 31, 2000
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Assets
<S>                                                                         <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                $  3,585
   Receivables and deposits                                                      863
   Restricted escrows                                                            227
   Other assets                                                                  675
   Investment properties:
      Land                                                   $ 11,635
      Buildings and related personal property                  87,545
                                                               99,180
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (46,816)        52,364
                                                                            $ 57,714

Liabilities and Partners' (Deficit) Capital

Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $   382
   Tenant security deposits payable                                              313
   Accrued property taxes                                                        488
   Due to former affiliate                                                       270
   Other liabilities                                                             623
   Mortgage notes payable                                                     59,587

Partners' (Deficit) Capital:
   General partner                                           $ (9,209)
   Limited partners (89,292 units issued and
      outstanding)                                              5,260         (3,949)
                                                                            $ 57,714
</TABLE>

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

<PAGE>

b)

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

                                   (Unaudited)

                          (in thousands, except unit data)



                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                               March 31,
                                                         2000              1999
Revenues:
   Rental income                                       $ 4,147           $ 4,068
   Other income                                            165               183
      Total revenues                                     4,312             4,251

Expenses:
   Operating                                             1,440             1,269
   General and administrative                               79               306
   Depreciation                                            801               739
   Interest                                              1,217             1,233
   Property tax                                            389               298
      Total expenses                                     3,926             3,845

Net income                                              $  386            $ 406

Net income allocated to general partner                 $   46            $   48
Net income allocated to limited partners                   340               358
                                                        $  386            $  406
Net income per limited partnership unit                 $ 3.81            $ 4.01

Distributions per limited partnership unit              $   --            $39.23


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

<PAGE>

c)

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

               CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' (DEFICIT) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)

                          (in thousands, except unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                     Limited
                                   Partnership   General     Limited
                                      Units      Partner     Partners       Total

<S>                                   <C>          <C>        <C>          <C>
Original capital contributions        89,292       $  --      $89,292      $89,292

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at December 31, 1999               89,292     $(9,255)     $ 4,920      $(4,335)

Net income for the three months
   ended March 31, 2000                   --          46          340          386

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at March 31, 2000                  89,292     $(9,209)     $ 5,260      $(3,949)
</TABLE>


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

<PAGE>

d)
                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

                                   (Unaudited)

                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                       March 31,
                                                                  2000         1999
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                             <C>          <C>
  Net income                                                    $   386      $   406
  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
   cash provided by operating activities:
      Depreciation                                                  801          739
      Amortization of loan costs and discount                        25           28
      Change in accounts:
       Receivables and deposits                                      91          (46)
       Other assets                                                 (68)         (63)
       Accounts payable                                             202          (20)
       Tenant security deposits payable                               3           --
       Accrued property taxes                                       (75)         (97)
       Other liabilities                                            (14)         (15)
         Net cash provided by operating activities                1,351          932

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (590)        (164)
  Net withdrawals from (deposits to) restricted escrows              93          (60)
         Net cash used in investing activities                     (497)        (224)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payment on mortgage notes payable                                (169)        (156)
  Distributions to partners                                          --       (3,574)
         Net cash used in financing activities                     (169)      (3,730)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                685       (3,022)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                  2,900        5,138
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                      $ 3,585      $ 2,116

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                        $ 1,192      $ 1,205
</TABLE>

At  December  31,  1999 and  March  31,  2000,  accounts  payable  and  property
improvements and replacements were adjusted by approximately $165,000.


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

<PAGE>

e)
                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                     NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)

Note A - Basis of Presentation

The  accompanying   unaudited   consolidated  financial  statements  of  Century
Properties Fund XIX (the  "Partnership" or  "Registrant")  have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial statements.  In the opinion of Fox Capital Management  Corporation,  a
California  corporation,   ("FCMC"  or  the  "Managing  General  Partner"),  all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a
fair  presentation  have been  included.  Operating  results for the three month
period ended March 31, 2000 are not  necessarily  indicative of the results that
may be expected  for the fiscal  year  ending  December  31,  2000.  For further
information,  refer  to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  footnotes
thereto  included  in the  Partnership's  Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.

Principles of Consolidation

The Registrant's  financial  statements  include the accounts of Misty Woods CPF
19, LLC, a limited liability  company in which the Registrant  ultimately owns a
100% economic  interest.  All significant  inter-entity  transactions  have been
eliminated.

Note B - Transfer of Control

Pursuant  to a series  of  transactions  which  closed  on  October  1, 1998 and
February 26, 1999,  Insignia Financial Group, Inc. and Insignia Properties Trust
merged into Apartment  Investment and Management Company  ("AIMCO"),  a publicly
traded real estate investment trust, with AIMCO being the surviving  corporation
(the "Insignia Merger").  As a result, AIMCO acquired 100% ownership interest in
the Managing General Partner. The Managing General Partner does not believe that
this  transaction  has had or will have a  material  effect on the  affairs  and
operations of the Partnership.

Note C - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Registrant has no employees and is dependent on the Managing General Partner
and its  affiliates for the management  and  administration  of all  Partnership
activities.   The  Partnership   Agreement  provides  for  certain  payments  to
affiliates for services and as  reimbursement  of certain  expenses  incurred by
affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

The following  payments to the Managing  General Partner and its affiliates were
incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999:

                                                                  2000      1999
                                                                  (in thousands)
 Property management fees (included in operating expenses)        $220      $215
 Reimbursement for services of affiliates (included in
   general and administrative and operating expenses
   and investment properties)                                       47        36
 Partnership management fee                                         --       228

<PAGE>

During  the three  months  ended  March 31,  2000 and  1999,  affiliates  of the
Managing  General Partner were entitled to receive 5% of gross receipts from all
of the Registrant's properties as compensation for providing property management
services.  The Registrant  paid to such  affiliates  approximately  $220,000 and
$215,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  received   reimbursement  of
accountable  administrative  expenses  amounting  to  approximately  $47,000 and
$36,000 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

Pursuant  to  the  Partnership  Agreement,  for  managing  the  affairs  of  the
Partnership, the general partner is entitled to receive a Partnership management
fee  equal  to  10%  of the  Partnership's  adjusted  cash  from  operations  as
distributed.  Approximately  $228,000 in Partnership  management  fees were paid
along with the  distribution  from operations made during the three months ended
March 31, 1999. No fees were paid during the three months ended March 31, 2000.

AIMCO and its affiliates  currently own 46,523.66  limited  partnership units in
the Partnership representing 52.103% of the outstanding units. A number of these
units were acquired  pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its  affiliates.
It is possible  that AIMCO or its  affiliates  will make one or more  additional
offers to acquire  additional limited  partnership  interests in the Partnership
for cash or in exchange for units in the operating  partnership of AIMCO.  Under
the  Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders  holding a  majority  of the Units are
entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters. As a result of its
ownership  of  52.103%  of the  outstanding  units,  AIMCO is in a  position  to
influence all voting  decisions with respect to the  Registrant.  When voting on
matters,  AIMCO would in all  likelihood  vote the Units it acquired in a manner
favorable  to the  interest of the  Managing  General  Partner  because of their
affiliation with the Managing General Partner.

Note D - Distribution

During  the  first  quarter  of March  31,  1999,  the  Partnership  distributed
approximately  $3,574,000  (approximately  $3,503,000  to the limited  partners,
$39.23 per limited partnership unit).  Approximately  $2,052,000  (approximately
$2,011,000 to the limited partners,  $22.52 per limited partnership unit) of the
distribution  was from operations and  approximately  $1,522,000  (approximately
$1,492,000 to the limited  partners,  $16.71 per limited  partnership  unit) was
from the remaining  proceeds of the sale of Parkside  Village  Apartments in May
1993. There were no distributions during the three months ended March 31, 2000.

Note E - Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information

Description  of the types of products  and  services  from which the  reportable
segment derives its revenues:

The  Partnership  has  one  reportable  segment:   residential  properties.  The
Partnership's residential property consists of eight apartment complexes located
in Georgia (3), Arizona (2), Florida (1), Texas (1), and North Carolina (1). The
Partnership rents apartment units to tenants for terms that are typically twelve
months or less.

<PAGE>

Measurement of segment profit or loss:

The  Partnership  evaluates  performance  based on segment  profit (loss) before
depreciation.  The accounting policies of the reportable segment are the same as
those of the Partnership as described in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1999.

Factors management used to identify the enterprise's reportable segment:

The  Partnership's  reportable  segment  consists of investment  properties that
offer similar products and services.  Although each of the investment properties
is  managed  separately,  they have been  aggregated  into one  segment  as they
provide services with similar types of products and customers.

Segment  information for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999 is shown
in the tables below (in  thousands).  The "Other"  column  includes  Partnership
administration  related  items and  income  and  expense  not  allocated  to the
reportable segment.

                 2000                  Residential     Other     Totals

Rental income                            $ 4,147       $  --     $ 4,147
Other income                                 163           2         165
Interest expense                           1,217          --       1,217
Depreciation                                 801          --         801
General and administrative expense            --          79          79
Segment profit (loss)                        463         (77)        386
Total assets                              56,251       1,463      57,714
Capital expenditures for investment
  properties                                 425          --         425


                 1999                  Residential     Other      Totals

Rental income                           $ 4,068       $   --    $ 4,068
Other income                                157           26        183
Interest expense                          1,233           --      1,233
Depreciation                                739           --        739
General and administrative expense           --          306        306
Segment profit (loss)                       686         (280)       406
Total assets                             56,684          999     57,683
Capital expenditures for investment
  properties                                 164          --        164

<PAGE>

Note F - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial  Group,  Inc., et al. in the Superior Court of the State of California
for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs  named as defendants,  among others,
the  Partnership,  the Managing  General Partner and several of their affiliated
partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action  purports to assert claims on
behalf of a class of limited  partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of
limited  partnerships  (including  the  Partnership)  which are named as nominal
defendants,  challenging  the  acquisition  by Insignia  Financial  Group,  Inc.
("Insignia")  and  entities  which  were,  at one time,  affiliates  of Insignia
("Insignia  Affiliates") of interests in certain general partner entities,  past
tender offers by Insignia  Affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units, the
management of partnerships  by Insignia  Affiliates and the Insignia Merger (see
"Note B - Transfer  of  Control").  The  plaintiffs  seek  monetary  damages and
equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership. On June 25,
1998,  the Managing  General  Partner  filed a motion  seeking  dismissal of the
action.  In lieu of  responding  to the  motion,  the  plaintiffs  have filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999.  Pending the ruling on such demurrers,
settlement negotiations commenced. On November 2, 1999, the parties executed and
filed a  Stipulation  of  Settlement,  settling  claims,  subject to final court
approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all limited partners who own units as
of November 3, 1999.  Preliminary  approval of the  settlement  was  obtained on
November 3, 1999 from the Superior Court of the State of  California,  County of
San Mateo, at which time the Court set a final approval hearing for December 10,
1999.  Prior to the  December  10,  1999  hearing  the  Court  received  various
objections to the settlement,  including a challenge to the Court's  preliminary
approval based upon the alleged lack of authority of class  plaintiffs'  counsel
to enter the settlement.  On December 14, 1999, the Managing General Partner and
its affiliates terminated the proposed settlement. Certain plaintiffs have filed
a motion to  disqualify  some of the  plaintiffs'  counsel  in the  action.  The
Managing  General  Partner does not anticipate  that costs  associated with this
case will be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

<PAGE>

ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The  matters  discussed  in this Form  10-QSB  contain  certain  forward-looking
statements  and  involve  risks and  uncertainties  (including  changing  market
conditions,   competitive  and  regulatory   matters,   etc.)  detailed  in  the
disclosures  contained  in this  Form  10-QSB  and the  other  filings  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission made by the Registrant from time to time. The
discussion of the  Registrant's  business and results of  operations,  including
forward-looking  statements  pertaining  to such  matters,  does not  take  into
account the effects of any changes to the  Registrant's  business and results of
operations.  Accordingly,  actual  results  could differ  materially  from those
projected in the forward-looking  statements as a result of a number of factors,
including those identified herein.

The Partnership's  investment  properties consist of eight apartment  complexes.
The following  table sets forth the average  occupancy of the properties for the
three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999:

                                                  Average Occupancy

      Property                                     2000       1999

      Sunrunner Apartments                          98%        94%
         St. Petersburg, Florida
      Misty Woods Apartments                        93%        95%
         Charlotte, North Carolina
      McMillan Place Apartments                     97%        97%
         Dallas, Texas
      Vinings Peak Apartments                       96%        96%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Wood Lake Apartments                          96%        95%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Plantation Crossing                           94%        96%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Greenspoint Apartments                        94%        97%
         Phoenix, Arizona
      Sandspoint Apartments                         94%        94%
         Phoenix, Arizona

The Managing General Partner attributes the decrease in occupancy at Greenspoint
Apartments  to rental  rate  increases  during  the past  twelve  months and the
increase in occupancy at  Sunrunner to enhanced  marketing  efforts and improved
local markets.

Results of Operations

The Partnership  realized net income of approximately  $386,000 and $406,000 for
the three  month  periods  ended  March 31,  2000 and  1999,  respectively.  The
decrease  in net  income  is  attributable  to an  increase  in  total  expenses
partially  offset  by an  increase  in total  revenues.  The  increase  in total
revenues is due to an increase in rental income  partially  offset by a decrease
in other income. The increase in rental income is the result of increased rental
rates at a majority of the  Partnership's  properties which more than offset the
decrease in occupancy at Misty Woods, Plantation Crossings, and Greenspoint. The
decrease  in  other  income  is  primarily  due to a  decrease  in cash  held in
interest-bearing  accounts  for the three  month  period  ended  March 31,  2000
compared to the same period in 1999. The increase in total expenses is primarily
attributable  to an  increase  in  operating,  depreciation,  and  property  tax
expenses  offset by a  decrease  in general  and  administrative  expenses.  The
increase in operating  expenses is the result of increased  property expense and
increased  insurance expense.  The increase in property expense is primarily due
to increased utility and salary related expenses at Greenspoint Apartments.  The
increase in depreciation expense is the result of the addition of capital assets
during the past twelve months. The increase in property tax expense is primarily
due to higher assessed values at several properties.

General and  administrative  expense  decreased due to a decrease in partnership
fees  associated  with  the  1999  operating  distribution  which  was  properly
reclassed  to general  partners'  deficit  during  the  second  quarter of 1999.
Included in general and  administrative  expense at both March 31, 2000 and 1999
are management  reimbursement  to the Managing General Partner allowed under the
Partnership  Agreement.  In addition,  costs  associated  with the quarterly and
annual  communications  with  investors and  regulatory  agencies and the annual
audit required by the Partnership Agreement are also included.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the Managing General
Partner monitors the rental market  environment of its investment  properties to
assess the feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy
levels and protecting  the  Partnership  from increases in expenses.  As part of
this plan, the Managing General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from
the burden of  inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and
maintaining a high overall  occupancy  level.  However,  due to changing  market
conditions,  which  can  result  in the use of  rental  concessions  and  rental
reductions to offset softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the
Managing General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At March 31, 2000, the Registrant had cash and cash equivalents of approximately
$3,585,000 as compared to  approximately  $2,116,000 at March 31, 1999.  For the
three  months  ended  March  31,  2000,  cash  and  cash  equivalents  increased
approximately  $685,000 from the Registrant's  year ended December 31, 1999. The
increase in cash and cash equivalents is due to approximately $1,351,000 of cash
provided by operating activities  partially offset by approximately  $497,000 of
cash used in investing  activities  and  approximately  $169,000 of cash used in
financing activities. Net cash used in investing activities consisted of capital
improvements  and   replacements   partially  offset  by  net  withdrawals  from
restricted escrows maintained by the mortgage lender. Net cash used in financing
activities consisted of payments of principal made on the mortgages  encumbering
the  Registrant's  investment  properties.  The Partnership  invests its working
capital reserves in money market accounts.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  has  made  available  to the
Partnership  a  credit  line  of  up to  $150,000  per  property  owned  by  the
Partnership.  The Partnership has no outstanding  amounts due under this line of
credit. Based on present plans, the Managing General Partner does not anticipate
the need to borrow in the near future. Other than cash and cash equivalents, the
line of credit is the Partnership's only unused source of liquidity.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures  required at the  properties  to  adequately  maintain the physical
assets and other  operating  needs of the Registrant and to comply with Federal,
state, and local legal and regulatory requirements. Capital improvements planned
for each of the Registrant's properties are detailed below.

Sunrunner Apartments

Approximately  $131,000 has been budgeted for 2000 for capital  improvements  at
Sunrunner  consisting  primarily  of  carpet  and vinyl  replacements,  plumbing
improvements,  and major  landscaping.  During the three  months ended March 31,
2000, the Partnership  completed  approximately  $31,000 of capital improvements
consisting  primarily of major landscaping,  pool  improvements,  and carpet and
vinyl replacement.  Additional improvements may be considered and will depend on
the  physical  condition  of the  property as well as  replacement  reserves and
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Misty Woods Apartments

Approximately  $68,000 has been  budgeted for 2000 for capital  improvements  at
Misty Woods  consisting  primarily of carpet and vinyl  replacements,  appliance
replacements,  wall coverings,  counter tops, and lighting upgrades.  During the
three months  ended March 31,  2000,  the  Partnership  completed  approximately
$17,000  of  capital  improvements  consisting  primarily  of  carpet  and vinyl
replacement,  wall  coverings,  interior  decoration,  and  heat  and  air  unit
replacements.   These   improvements  were  funded  from  operating  cash  flow.
Additional  improvements  may be  considered  and will  depend  on the  physical
condition of the property as well as replacement  reserves and anticipated  cash
flow generated by the property.

McMillian Place Apartments

Approximately  $201,000 has been budgeted for 2000 for capital  improvements  at
McMillian Place consisting primarily of appliance replacement,  carpet and vinyl
replacements,  interior  decorating,  and  exterior  painting.  During the three
months ended March 31, 2000, the Partnership completed  approximately $76,000 of
capital  improvements  consisting  primarily of  appliances  and floor  covering
replacements.   These   improvements  were  funded  from  operating  cash  flow.
Additional  improvements  may be  considered  and will  depend  on the  physical
condition of the property as well as replacement  reserves and anticipated  cash
flow generated by the property.

Vinings Peak Apartments

Approximately  $92,000 has been  budgeted for 2000 for capital  improvements  at
Vinings Peak consisting  primarily of carpet and vinyl  replacements,  appliance
replacements,  wall coverings,  and HVAC  replacements.  During the three months
ended March 31, 2000, the Partnership completed approximately $61,000 of capital
improvements   consisting   primarily   of   carpet   and   vinyl   replacement,
wallcoverings,   structural  improvements,  and  a  submetering  project.  These
improvements were funded from operating cash flow.  Additional  improvements may
be considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as well
as replacement reserves and anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Wood Lake Apartments

Approximately  $72,000 has been  budgeted for 2000 for capital  improvements  at
Wood Lake consisting primarily of carpet and vinyl replacements, wall coverings,
appliance  replacement,  and HVAC  replacements.  During the three  months ended
March 31,  2000,  the  Partnership  completed  approximately  $60,000 of capital
improvements  consisting  primarily  of  carpet  and  vinyl  replacement,   wall
covering,  and appliances.  These  improvements  were funded from operating cash
flow. Additional  improvements may be considered and will depend on the physical
condition of the property as well as replacement  reserves and anticipated  cash
flow generated by the property.

Plantation Crossing Apartments

Approximately  $59,000 has been  budgeted for 2000 for capital  improvements  at
Plantation Crossing consisting primarily of carpet and vinyl replacements,  wall
coverings,  and appliance replacements.  During the three months ended March 31,
2000, the Partnership  completed  approximately  $54,000 of capital improvements
consisting  primarily  of carpet  and vinyl  replacement,  appliances  and sewer
replacements.   These   improvements  were  funded  from  operating  cash  flow.
Additional  improvements  may be  considered  and will  depend  on the  physical
condition of the property as well as replacement  reserves and anticipated  cash
flow generated by the property.

Greenspoint Apartments

Approximately  $121,000 has been budgeted for 2000 for capital  improvements  at
Greenspoint  consisting  primarily  of  carpet  and  vinyl  replacements,  major
landscaping,  lighting upgrades,  HVAC replacements,  and plumbing improvements.
During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2000,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $64,000 of capital  improvements  consisting  primarily  of major
landscaping,  roof replacements,  and appliances. These improvements were funded
from operating  cash flow.  Additional  improvements  may be considered and will
depend on the physical condition of the property as well as replacement reserves
and anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Sands Point Apartments

Approximately  $154,000 has been budgeted for 2000 for capital  improvements  at
Sands  Point  consisting  primarily  of  carpet  and vinyl  replacements,  major
landscaping,  roof replacements,  exterior painting, plumbing improvements,  and
parking lot  resurfacing.  During the three  months  ended March 31,  2000,  the
Partnership completed  approximately $62,000 of capital improvements  consisting
primarily of plumbing enhancements,  appliances,  roof replacements,  carpet and
vinyl  replacement,  and swimming pool  improvements.  These  improvements  were
funded from operating cash flow.  Additional  improvements may be considered and
will depend on the physical  condition  of the  property as well as  replacement
reserves and anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

The additional  capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available
from operations or from Partnership  reserves.  To the extent that such budgeted
capital improvements are completed, the Registrant's distributable cash flow, if
any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The Partnership's  current assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term
needs  (exclusive  of capital  improvements)  of the  Partnership.  The mortgage
indebtedness of approximately  $59,587,000,  net of discount,  is amortized over
varying  periods with  required  balloon  payments  ranging from October 2002 to
January  2006.  The Managing  General  Partner  will  attempt to refinance  such
indebtedness  and/or sell the  properties  prior to such  maturity  date. If the
properties cannot be refinanced or sold for a sufficient  amount, the Registrant
will risk losing such properties through foreclosure.

The Registrant was prohibited from making  distributions  from the operations of
the Registrant  until the mortgages  encumbering  McMillan Place were satisfied.
However, under the terms of the debt restructuring obtained on McMillan Place on
January 29, 1998, the Registrant is now permitted to make distributions from the
operations of the  Registrant's  other investment  properties.  During the first
quarter of March 31, 1999, the Partnership distributed  approximately $3,574,000
(approximately   $3,503,000  to  the  limited   partners,   $39.23  per  limited
partnership unit).  Approximately  $2,052,000  (approximately  $2,011,000 to the
limited partners,  $22.52 per limited  partnership unit) of the distribution was
from operations and approximately  $1,522,000  (approximately  $1,492,000 to the
limited  partners,  $16.71 per limited  partnership unit) was from the remaining
proceeds of the sale of Parkside  Village  Apartments in May 1993. There were no
distributions  during  the three  months  ended  March  31,  2000.  Future  cash
distributions  will depend on the levels of net cash generated from  operations,
the   availability  of  cash  reserves  and  the  timing  of  debt   maturities,
refinancings,  and/or property sales. The Partnership's  distribution  policy is
reviewed on a semi-annual  basis. There can be no assurance,  however,  that the
Partnership  will  generate  sufficient  funds from  operations  after  required
capital  expenditures  to permit any  distributions  to its  partners in 2000 or
subsequent periods.

<PAGE>

                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial  Group,  Inc., et al. in the Superior Court of the State of California
for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs  named as defendants,  among others,
the  Partnership,  the Managing  General Partner and several of their affiliated
partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action  purports to assert claims on
behalf of a class of limited  partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of
limited  partnerships  (including  the  Partnership)  which are named as nominal
defendants,  challenging  the  acquisition  by Insignia  Financial  Group,  Inc.
("Insignia")  and  entities  which  were,  at one time,  affiliates  of Insignia
("Insignia  Affiliates") of interests in certain general partner entities,  past
tender offers by Insignia  Affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units, the
management of partnerships  by Insignia  Affiliates and the Insignia Merger (see
"Part I - Financial Information, Item 1. Financial Statements, Note B - Transfer
of  Control").  The  plaintiffs  seek  monetary  damages and  equitable  relief,
including  judicial  dissolution  of the  Partnership.  On June  25,  1998,  the
Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu
of responding to the motion, the plaintiffs have filed an amended complaint. The
Managing  General  Partner filed  demurrers to the amended  complaint which were
heard  February  1999.   Pending  the  ruling  on  such  demurrers,   settlement
negotiations  commenced.  On November 2, 1999, the parties  executed and filed a
Stipulation of Settlement,  settling claims, subject to final court approval, on
behalf of the Partnership and all limited  partners who own units as of November
3, 1999. Preliminary approval of the settlement was obtained on November 3, 1999
from the  Superior  Court of the State of  California,  County of San Mateo,  at
which time the Court set a final approval  hearing for December 10, 1999.  Prior
to the December 10, 1999 hearing the Court  received  various  objections to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the  alleged  lack of  authority  of class  plaintiffs'  counsel  to  enter  the
settlement.  On  December  14,  1999,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and  its
affiliates  terminated the proposed settlement.  Certain plaintiffs have filed a
motion to disqualify some of the plaintiffs' counsel in the action. The Managing
General Partner does not anticipate that costs associated with this case will be
material to the Partnership's overall operations.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a)    Exhibits:

                  Exhibit 27, Financial Data Schedule, is filed as an exhibit to
                  this report.

            b)    Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended March 31, 2000.

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.

                                    CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                                    By:   FOX PARTNERS II
                                          Its General Partner

                                    By:   FOX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
                                          Its Managing General Partner

                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President

                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Controller

                                    Date: