alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 227.201 Criteria for requiring availability of EEBAs in the locomotive cab. ( a ) *In general.* ( 1 ) ( i ) Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, a railroad is required to provide an EEBA to each of the following of its employees while the employee is located in the cab of a locomotive of an in-service freight train transporting a PIH material, including a residue of a PIH material: ( A ) Any train employee;
( B ) Any direct supervisor of the train employee;
( C ) Any employee who is deadheading; and
( D ) Any other employee designated by the railroad in writing and at the discretion of the railroad.
( ii ) Each EEBA provided to an employee identified in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section must meet the EEBA-selection criteria of § 227.203 and must have been inspected and be in working order pursuant to the requirements of § 227.207 at the time that the EEBA is provided to the employee.
( 2 ) Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, a railroad shall not use a locomotive to transport a PIH material, including a residue of a PIH material, in an in-service freight train unless each of the employees identified in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section while occupying a locomotive cab of the train has access to an EEBA that satisfies the EEBA selection criteria in § 227.203 and that has been inspected and is in working order pursuant to the requirements in § 227.207.
( b ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) A railroad is not required to provide an EEBA, or make accessible an EEBA, to an employee while in the locomotive cab of an in-service freight train transporting a PIH material if all of the PIH materials in the train, including a residue of a PIH material, are being transported in one or more intermodal containers.
( 2 ) This subpart does not apply to any of the following: ( i ) Employees who are moving a locomotive or group of locomotives coupled to a car or group of cars transporting a PIH material, including a residue of a PIH material, only within the confines of a locomotive repair or servicing area.
( ii ) Employees who are moving a locomotive or group of locomotives coupled to a car or group of cars transporting a PIH material, including a residue of a PIH material for distances of less than 100 feet for inspection or maintenance purposes.
( c ) *Employee misconduct.* Notwithstanding any exceptions identified in this subpart, any employee who willfully tampers with or vandalizes an EEBA shall be subject to this subpart for purposes of enforcement relating to § 227.213.
# AGRITECH `- YS ," EI , /1 ,, 18 May 2015
U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590
Re: Application for Amendment to Exemption 11574, Agri Tech Systems, LLC FAA Docket 2015-0352

Dear Sir or Madam, On May 13, 2015, the FAA issued Exemption 11574 to Agri Tech Systems, LLC ("Agri Tech"), allowing commercial operations of its PA-01 Vapor aircraft under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012. Agri Tech now respectfully applies for an amendment to the Exemption to allow Agri Tech to operate the Pulse Aerospace Vapor 55 in addition to the PA-01 Vapor described in the exemption request, under the same conditions as approved in Exemption 11574.
The name and address of the applicant is: Agri Tech Systems, LLC Attn: Bret Lucas 12871 Geneva Street Indianola, IA 50125 Telephone: 515-961-4026 Email: bret@agritechsystems.com
The Vapor 55 aircraft is essentially the same aircraft described in Exemption 11574 except on a slightly larger scale. The added size simply allows for greater payload capacity and longer flight times due to increased battery size. The flight control system and Ground Control Station are the same as those used on the PA-01 Vapor in Exemption 11574.

12871 Geneva Street, Indianola, IA 50125 9 Phone 515.961.4026 o info@agritechsystems.com owWW,agritechsystems.comThe Flight Manual is attached as Agri Tech's Confidential "Appendix A" which details the

specifications and operation of the Vapor 55. Agri Tech would request that this document not be made available to the public due to the proprietary information contained therein. Agri Tech intends operations consistent with those outlined in Exemption 11574 and would only ask that Exemption 11574 be amended to allow operation of the Vapor 55 aircraft. At all times, the total weight of the aircraft will be under 55 pounds. Because the Vapor 55 is so similar to the PA-01 Vapor aircraft in Exemption 11574, and the conditions under which it will operate remain the same, notice need not be provided in the Federal Register nor public comment solicited. Please contact us if any additional information is needed.
Sincerely yours, / `.'°_. Bret J. Lucas CEO, Agri Tech Systems Enclosure
Indemnity Letter - Professor Dame Sandra Dawson



 Exhibit 4.33 
  

			
		 	Barclays Corporate Secretariat
		 	Level 29
		 	One Churchill Place
		 	London
		 	E14 5HP
	22 June 2005	 	
		
		 	Tel 020 7116 1000
	Professor Dame Sandra Dawson DBE	 	Fax 020 7116 7665
	The Judge Institute of Management Studies	 	
	University of Cambridge	 	
	Trumpington Street	 	
	Cambridge CB2 1AG	 	

 

 
 Dear Sandra 
 Indemnity contained in Articles of Association 
 This letter supplements and forms
part of the terms of your letter of appointment dated 11 February 2003. 
 For the avoidance of doubt, the Boards have confirmed that as a director of
Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC you have the benefit of and are able to rely upon the indemnity contained in Article 160 of the Barclays PLC Articles of Association and the identical wording in Article 157 of the Barclays Bank PLC Articles of
Association, the terms of which are hereby expressly incorporated into your letter of appointment. Copies of the relevant Articles are attached for your ease of reference. 
 The terms of this letter are governed by English law and the parties submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English Courts. 
 Yours sincerely 
  

					
	 /s/ Lawrence Dickinson
	 		  	 /s/ Patrick Gonsalves

	Lawrence Dickinson	 		  	Patrick Gonsalves
	Company Secretary	 		  	Joint Secretary
	Barclays PLC	 		  	Barclays Bank PLC
			
	Countersigned by	 		  	
			
	 


	 		  	
	Director	 		  	

  
  
  
  
  
 Barclays PLC. Registered in England. Registered No: 48839. Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London E14 5HP
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20794 Conference Calendar

RICHARD W. JENNINGS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JACQUELINE A. HARVEY; HELEN M. NEWMAN; MARK H. RODRIQUEZ; WILLIAM D. BARTEE; RICHARD THALER, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CV-3879

-------------------- December 11, 2002 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Richard Jennings, Texas inmate #820776, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”), appeals the district court’s dismissal as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We review a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 dismissal as frivolous for an abuse of discretion. Black

v. Warren , 134 F.3d 732, 733 (5th Cir. 1998).No. 02-20794 -2- To establish a constitutional violation based on the conditions of confinement, Jennings must show that the defendants acted with deliberate indifference. See Wilson v. Seiter , 501 U.S. 294, 297 (1991). He must show that the prison officials were aware of facts from which an inference of an excessive risk to his health or safety could be drawn and that the prison officials actually drew an inference that such potential for harm existed. See Farmer v. Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 842 (1994). Jennings has not established that defendants Harvey and Newman acted with deliberate indifference in closing the electronic cell door on his arm. Jennings admitted that the officers were not looking and could not have seen whether anyone was in the way of the closing cell doors. Jennings’ allegations indicate that Harvey and Newman did not follow procedure and that they may have acted negligently. These allegations do not establish a constitutional violation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Leffall v. Dallas Indep. School Dist. , 28 F.3d 521, 525 (5th Cir. 1994); Hernandez v. Estelle , 788 F.2d 1154, 1158 (5th Cir. 1986). Jennings also has not established that defendant Bartee was aware of facts from which an inference of a risk to Jennings’ safety could be drawn and that Bartee actually drew an inference that the potential for harm existed. Farmer , 511 U.S. at 847. Jennings’ allegations against Shift Lieutenant Rodriquez and Warden Thaler based on their positions as supervisors do not establish a constitutional violation. Section 1983, 42 U.S.C.,No. 02-20794 -3- does not afford relief for supervisory or respondeat superior liability. Thompkins v. Belt , 828 F.2d 298, 303-04 (5th Cir. 1987. Jennings’ conclusional allegations are not sufficient to demonstrate a conspiracy. See Wilson v. Budney , 976 F.2d 957, 958 (5th Cir. 1992); Russell v. Millsap , 781 F.2d 381, 383 (5th Cir. 1985). Jennings has abandoned his claims concerning the medical treatment that he received by failing to assert the claims in this court. Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Joseph J. Lazzara, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Scientific Technologies Incorporated for the quarterly
and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly represents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Scientific
Technologies Incorporated.

|Dated: November 14, 2003 | By:/s/Joseph J. Lazzara_______              
|------------------------ | --------------------------------------------
|                         | Name: Joseph J. Lazzara                     
|                         | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer







I, Richard O. Faria, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Scientific Technologies Incorporated for the
quarterly and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly represents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Scientific
Technologies Incorporated.

|Dated: November 14, 2003 | By:/s/Richard O. Faria_______                    
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------
|                         | Name: Richard O. Faria                           
|                         | Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
#### § 236.588 Periodic test.

Except as provided in § 236.586, periodic test of the automatic train stop, train control, or cab signal apparatus shall be made at least once every 92 days, and on multiple-unit cars as specified by the carrier, subject to approval by the FRA.

[49 FR 3387, Jan. 26, 1984]
Exhibit 4

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Greg A. LeClaire, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

|(1) |  | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Greg A.
LeClaireGreg A. LeClaireAugust 5, 2005

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Event

Date

Amb. 

Temp. 

(F)

Rel. 

Humid 

(%)

Gen. Amb. (Sunny, 

Cloudy, Rain, Snow)

Product (FeMn, 

SiMn, MOR)

Bldg/Furnace (F1, 

F12, MOR)

Tapping, Cast-Ladle, Ladle Pour, Ladle Transfer, Slag 

Rake-off, MOR Transfer, MOR Reaction, Cast-Nest Duration

Opacity Reading 

(%)

3/6/2013 34 84 Cloudy HC FeMn F1 Tapping/Cast-Ladle 19 min. 5 - 40

Ladle Pour/Transfer 6 min. 0 - 30

Slag Rake-off 6 min. 0 - 15

MOR Transfer 2 min. 0

 Event

Date

Amb. 

Temp. 

(F)

Rel. 

Humid 

(%)

Gen. Amb. (Sunny, 

Cloudy, Rain, Snow)

Product (FeMn, 

SiMn, MOR)

Bldg/Furnace (F1, 

F12, MOR)

Tapping, Cast-Ladle, Ladle Pour, Ladle Transfer, Slag 

Rake-off, MOR Transfer, MOR Reaction, Cast-Nest Duration

Opacity Reading 

(%)

3/11/2013 59 46 Rain HC FeMn F1 Tapping/Cast-Ladle 17 min. 0 - 10

Ladle Pour/Transfer 5 min. 0 - 30

Slag Rake-off 6 min. 0 - 15

MOR Transfer 8 min. 0 - 15

 Event

Date

Amb. 

Temp. 

(F)

Rel. 

Humid 

(%)

Gen. Amb. (Sunny, 

Cloudy, Rain, Snow)

Product (FeMn, 

SiMn, MOR)

Bldg/Furnace (F1, 

F12, MOR)

Tapping, Cast-Ladle, Ladle Pour, Ladle Transfer, Slag 

Rake-off, MOR Transfer, MOR Reaction, Cast-Nest Duration

Opacity Reading 

(%)

4/2/2013 33 39 Sunny SiMn F12 Tapping/Cast-Ladle 22 min. 0 - 25

Ladle Pour/Transfer 10 min. 10 - 20

Slag Rake-off 3 min. 10 - 20

Ladle Transfer/Cast-Nest 7 min. 5 - 50

 Event

Date

Amb. 

Temp. 

(F)

Rel. 

Humid 

(%)

Gen. Amb. (Sunny, 

Cloudy, Rain, Snow)

Product (FeMn, 

SiMn, MOR)

Bldg/Furnace (F1, 

F12, MOR)

Tapping, Cast-Ladle, Ladle Pour, Ladle Transfer, Slag 

Rake-off, MOR Transfer, MOR Reaction, Cast-Nest Duration

Opacity Reading 

(%)

4/3/2013 35 42 Sunny SiMn F12 Tapping/Cast-Ladle 12 min. 0 - 35

Ladle Pour/Transfer 6 min. 5 - 30

Slag Rake-off 6 min. 0 - 20

Ladle Transfer/Cast-Nest 9 min. 5 - 40

Secondary Furnace Processes Visible Emissions Measurement
§ 37.73 Purchase or lease of used non-rail vehicles by public entities operating fixed route systems. ( a ) Except as provided elsewhere in this section, each public entity operating a fixed route system purchasing or leasing, after August 25, 1990, a used bus or other used vehicle for use on the system, shall ensure that the vehicle is readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs.
( b ) A public entity may purchase or lease a used vehicle for use on its fixed route system that is not readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities if, after making demonstrated good faith efforts to obtain an accessible vehicle, it is unable to do so.
( c ) Good faith efforts shall include at least the following steps: ( 1 ) An initial solicitation for used vehicles specifying that all used vehicles are to be lift-equipped and otherwise accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, or, if an initial solicitation is not used, a documented communication so stating;
( 2 ) A nationwide search for accessible vehicles, involving specific inquiries to used vehicle dealers and other transit providers; and
( 3 ) Advertising in trade publications and contacting trade associations.
( d ) Each public entity purchasing or leasing used vehicles that are not readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities shall retain documentation of the specific good faith efforts it made for three years from the date the vehicles were purchased. These records shall be made available, on request, to the FTA Administrator and the public.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 178 (Friday, September 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 52567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4599]



[[Page 52567]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Date and Time: Thursday, September 20, 2007 at 2 p.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items To Be Discussed: 
Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

Person to Contact for Information: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-4599 Filed 9-12-07; 3:38 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
#### Thomas MacKellar, Respondent, *v.*La Marcus A. Thompson, Appellant.

*MacKellar*v. *Thompson,*137 App. Div. 897, affirmed.

(Argued May 16, 1911;

decided May 30, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 22, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court in an action to recover upon promissory notes.

*Theodosius F. Stevens*and *Robert H. Elder*for appellant.

*James Garfield Purdy*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
#### § 236.402 Signals controlled by track circuits and control operator.

The control circuits for home signal aspects with indications more favorable than “proceed at restricted speed” shall be controlled by track circuits extending through entire block. Also in addition, at controlled point they may be controlled by control operator, and, at manually operated interlocking, they shall be controlled manually in cooperation with control operator.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0886.html[7/21/2015 5:13:30 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-1kfs

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0886

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Arthur Haacke

General Comment

My 401 K is money that I have earned during my lifetime, it is my money and I should have the power to control

 it completely.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0622.html[7/21/2015 7:17:45 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-v0s8

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0622

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Kathy Coppinger

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement!
-----Original Message----- 

From: misllee@yahoo.com [mailto:misllee@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:51 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Michelle Lee 

7614 waerford glen loop Apt # 2423 

Charlotte, NC 28226
From: Aubrey Saunders [mailto:aubrey.saunders@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9:00 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Retirement Savings in 401(K)s and IRA accounts

Let’s not let the Obama administration “protect” our retirement the way they’ve “protected” our 

health care. At least this time Obama didn’t say, “If you like your brokers, you can keep them.”
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 4:52 PM

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jy5-7u0b

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2159

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Cheryl Mulligan

General Comment

Who does this actually help, the consumer or the large hedge fund managers? I don't need a 

daddy/government DICTATING how I invest MY money that I EARNED.