alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45765-45769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3981]



[[Page 45765]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 07-38]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 Dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 07-38 with attached transmittal, and 
policy justification.

    Dated: August 8, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 45766]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AU07.005


[[Page 45767]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AU07.006


[[Page 45768]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AU07.007

[FR Doc. 07-3981 Filed 8-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
#### Stephen R. Ryan, Appellant, v. Erastus R. Burnham, Respondent.

Motion denied.
-----Original Message----- 

From: williraj@yahoo.com [mailto:williraj@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 12:04 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Rachel Williams 

55-1106 River Drive South 

Jersey City, NJ 07310
-----Original Message----- 

From: ccrittenden@csun.edu [mailto:ccrittenden@csun.edu] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:02 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Charles Crittenden 

11300 Foothill Blvd. #19 

Lake View Terrace, CA 91342
-----Original Message----- 

From: tmb3@u.washington.edu [mailto:tmb3@u.washington.edu] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:02 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Tracy McBride 

920 90th St 

Everett, WA 98204
From: Velasco, Jose [mailto:jvelasco@metlife.com] 

Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 11:24 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

July 6, 2015

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Ave. NW, Room S-1032

Washington, D.C. 20210

To Whom It May Concern:

I highly oppose the Conflicts of Interest Proposed Rule.

Clients highly need our expertise in the subject area, and advisers need to keep being compensated 

accordingly.

Please reconsider this new proposed rule.

Recently, I helped a client decide what to do with her 401(k) account when she terminated 

employment. The decision was made that rolling the assets into an Individual Retirement Account (IRA) 

was the best choice for this client. I helped the client decide how to invest the IRA account to best meet 

her risk tolerance, financial situation, tax status, investment objectives, liquidity needs, and risk 

tolerance. I received commissions from the purchase of mutual funds. Under the current rule, I would 

be prohibited from providing any of those services. The likely result would be that Jane would instead 

just cash out her 401(k) and would suffer the tax and the early withdrawal penalty, a wrong decision but 

one likely if she hadn’t had access to my services.

Sincerely,

Jose F. Velasco, LUTCF., ChFC®, CFP®

Financial Adviser

12M Cypress Financial Group

an office of MetLife and part of the MetLife Premier Client Group

Tel: 305-929-5343

Fax: 305-448-0365

806 Douglas Rd. Suite #800

Coral Gables, FL 33134

Email jvelasco@metlife.com

www.cypressfinancialgroup.com

Please do not leave any securities trade requests by e-mail as orders cannot be honored in this 

manner. Please dial (800) 638-8378 to place a trade. 

If you do not wish to receive commercial emails from MetLife or its affiliates in the future, email your

request to dnss@metlife.com. Do not respond to this email to opt-out. You may also contact us in 

writing at MetLife Customer Privacy Center, P. O. Box 489, Warwick, Rhode Island 02887-9954. Please 

allow up to 10 days for us to process your opt-out. You may receive emails from us during that time, for 
which we apologize. If you are eligible for benefits through an employer that offers benefits provided by 

a MetLife company, this opt-out will not apply to emails relating to those benefits.

The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is for the intended 

addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the information, or copying of this 

message is prohibited. If you are not the intended addressee, please notify the sender 

immediately and delete this message.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131062 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan FREDERICK T. STREETS, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131062 COA: 266741 WCAC: 02-000522 CWC TEXTRON, INC., and KEMPER INSURANCE COMPANIES, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 23, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2006

Clerk
# Document Library

                  - A Guide to Tracing American Indian & Alaska Native Ancestry  
                  - Tribal Leaders Directory
                  - American Indian Population and Labor Force Reports  
                  - BIA Regional, Agency, and Field Offices Map 
                  - Indian Affairs Job Vacancy Announcements
                  - Scholarships and Grants for Education 
                  - Indian Affairs FY 2017 Budget Justification and Performance Information (Green Book)
                  - Indian Affairs FY 2016 Budget Justifications and Performance Information (Green Book)
                  - Indian Affairs FY 2015 Budget Justifications and Performance Information (Green Book)
                  - Indian Affairs FY 2014 Budget Justifications and Performance Information (Green Book)
                  - Indian Affairs FY 2013 Budget Justifications and Performance Information (Green Book)
                  - Indian Affairs FY 2012 Budget Justifications and Performance Information (Green Book)
                  - Indian Affairs FY 2011 Budget Justifications and Performance Information (Green Book)  
                  - Assistant Secretaries - Indian Affairs from 1977 to Present  
                  - Grant Opportunities
                  - Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
                  - Native One Stop
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00245-CV

R. J. R., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

NO. C190138CPS, THE HONORABLE GARY L. BANKS, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant R. J. R. filed her notice of appeal on May 24, 2021. The appellate 

record was complete on June 4, 2021, making appellant’s brief due on June 24, 2021. To date, 

appellant’s brief has not been filed. 

The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals 

from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days 

for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule requires greater compliance with briefing 

deadlines. Therefore, we order Rae Leifeste to file appellant’s brief no later than July 20, 2021. 

If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be 

held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on June 30, 2021.

Before Justices Goodwin, Triana, and Kelly
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1064. MARVIS MCDANIEL-IVEY v. BERRYL ANDERSON.

Marvis McDaniel-Ivey has filed an original mandamus action in this Court,

asking this Court to compel a magistrate court judge to impose a stay in what appears

to be a dispossessory and foreclosure proceeding. This case does not, however, fall

within the ambit of this Court’s limited mandamus jurisdiction.

Appellate courts have mandamus authority in aid of their jurisdiction, see Ga.

Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. IV, but the need to resort to the appellate courts

for such relief is “extremely rare” because “the superior courts of this state have the

power, in proper cases, to issue process in the nature of mandamus, prohibition,

specific performance, quo warranto, and injunction[.]” Brown v. Johnson, 251 Ga.

436, 436 (306 SE2d 655) (1983). Mandamus will issue “only if (1) no other adequate

legal remedy is available to effectuate the relief sought; and (2) the applicant has a

clear legal right to such relief.” Bibb County v. Monroe County, 294 Ga. 730, 734 (2)

(755 SE2d 760) (2014). Moreover, prior to seeking mandamus relief from an

appellate court, a litigant is generally required to first petition the superior court for

such relief. See Byrd v. Robinson, 349 Ga. App. 19, 21 (825 SE2d 424) (2019).

Thisis not one of the extremely rare instancesin which this Court will exercise

original mandamus jurisdiction. See Gay v. Owens, 292 Ga. 480, 482-483 (2) (738

SE2d 614) (2013). Until McDaniel-Ivey has pursued mandamus relief in superior

court and obtained a ruling thereon, there is no basis for this Court to exercise

jurisdiction. See Brown, 251 Ga. at 436. 

April 09, 2021
Accordingly, this petition for writ of mandamus is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/09/2021
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, October 25, 1995 (134), Para 134.15 Recess--9:54 P.M.]
[Page 1595]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.134.15  recess--9:54 p.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. WELDON of Florida, pursuant to clause 12 
of rule I, declared the House in recess at 9 o'clock and 54 minutes 
p.m., subject to the call of the Chair.

       THURSDAY, OCTOBER 26 (LEGISLATIVE DAY OF OCTOBER 25), 1995
```
§ 272.105 Requirement to file critical incident stress plan electronically. ( a ) Each railroad subject to this part must submit its critical incident stress plan and any material modifications to that plan electronically through FRA's Web site at *http://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/OfficeofSafety/CISP .*
( b ) The railroad's electronic submission shall provide the Associate Administrator with the following: ( 1 ) The name of the railroad;
( 2 ) The names of two individuals, including job titles, who will be the railroad's points of contact;
( 3 ) The mailing addresses for the railroad's points of contact;
( 4 ) The railroad's system or main headquarters address located in the United States;
( 5 ) The email addresses for the railroad's points of contact;
( 6 ) The daytime telephone numbers for the railroad's points of contact; and
( 7 ) An electronic copy of the railroad's critical incident stress plan or any material modifications to that plan being submitted for FRA approval.
( c ) FRA may electronically store any materials required by this part.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2366 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2366

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 15, 1995

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To repeal an unnecessary medical device reporting requirement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL.

    Section 1862 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y) is 
amended by striking subsection (h).

            Passed the House of Representatives November 14, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/18/15 9:22 PM

Received: July 16, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k0c-43vu

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2457

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I am perfectly capable of managing my own retirement please leave 401Ks and other retirement 

accounts alone.
-----Original Message----- 

From: katrinamauro@gmail.com [mailto:katrinamauro@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 1:41 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Katrina Mauro 

119 Jewel St 

Brooklyn, NY 11222
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA real time dynamic data acquisition and processing system for velocity, density, and total temperature fluctuation measurementsThe real time Dynamic Data Acquisition and Processing System (DDAPS) is described which provides the capability for the simultaneous measurement of velocity, density, and total temperature fluctuations. The system of hardware and software is described in context of the wind tunnel environment. The DDAPS replaces both a recording mechanism and a separate data processing system. DDAPS receives input from hot wire anemometers. Amplifiers and filters condition the signals with computer controlled modules. The analog signals are simultaneously digitized and digitally recorded on disk. Automatic acquisition collects necessary calibration and environment data. Hot wire sensitivities are generated and applied to the hot wire data to compute fluctuations. The presentation of the raw and processed data is accomplished on demand. The interface to DDAPS is described along with the internal mechanisms of DDAPS. A summary of operations relevant to the use of the DDAPS is also provided.Document ID19910008781Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsClukey, Steven J.*(Vigyan Research Associates, Inc. Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1991Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-182069NAS 1.26:182069Accession Number91N18094Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-60-21-04CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18585Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910008781.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 6/12/15 8:41 AM

Received: June 05, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8j93-qtzq

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0307

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Tunc Tanin

Address: 

45 Prospect Street

5th Floor

Cambridge, MA, 02139

Email: tunctanin@gmail.com

Phone: 7819742137

General Comment

Please pass this proposal. I am an independent RIA and I used to be a broker under FINRA 

supervision. I have seen many abuses of the suitability rule and its shortcomings. I am happy to 

see also FINRA moving now in the direction of fiduciary duty. My comments would be to 

expand the rule on how compensation is to be shown to the client especially when there is an 

annuity sale. While disclosing the amount of commission or compensation is good, there are 

many ways this rule can get abused. Besides direct monetary compensation, there are many 

trips offered by financial institutions under the guidance of educational seminar. My former 

broker dealer NY Life had a way of offering extra compensation to its agents. Any orphan 

accounts( these are accounts that when an advisor leaves a broker dealer) were assigned not 

based on the best interest of the client, they were assigned based on how much an advisor 

brought to NY Life profits. Now this is not an NY Life only issue, almost all life insurance 

broker dealers follow this practice. It is unclear from the proposed rule how an advisor can 

show they are compensated by putting their money in Mutual Fund A, they will earn future 

referals. These orphan assignments will become a even stronger currency of payment for 

financial advisory firms.

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b1d828&format=xml&show... 6/12/2015
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350)
 
 The undersigned, as the chief executive
officer of PAB Bankshares, Inc., certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, which
accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of PAB Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for
the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall
not be relied upon for any other purpose.
 
 Dated this 9th day of November,
2009.
 
 /s/ Donald J. Torbert, Jr.Donald
      J. Torbert, Jr.President
      and Chief Executive Officer
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
PAB Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by PAB Bankshares, Inc. and furnished
to the SEC or its staff upon request.
#### § 236.831 Time, delay.

As applied to an automatic train stop or train control system, the time which elapses after the onboard apparatus detects a more restrictive indication until the brakes start to apply.

[49 FR 3388, Jan. 26, 1984]
§ 230.108 Steam locomotive leading and trailing trucks. ( a ) *Maintenance.* Trucks shall be maintained in safe and suitable condition for service. Center plates shall fit properly, and the male center plate shall extend into the female center plate not less than 3 ⁄ 4 inch. All centering devices shall be properly maintained and shall not permit lost motion in excess of 1 ⁄ 2 inch.
( b ) *Safety chain required.* A suitable safety chain shall be provided at each front corner of all four wheel engine trucks.
( c ) *Clearance required.* All parts of trucks shall have sufficient clearance to prevent them from interfering with any other part of the steam locomotive.
§ 218.3 Application. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this part applies to railroads that operate rolling equipment on standard gage track which is part of the general railroad system of transportation.
( b ) This part does not apply to— ( 1 ) A railroad that operates only on track inside an installation which is not part of the general railroad system of transportation, or
( 2 ) Rapid transit operations in an urban area that are not connected with the general railroad system of transportation.
[44 FR 2175, Jan. 10, 1979, as amended at 53 FR 28599, July 28, 1988]