alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0663.html[7/21/2015 8:20:39 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-d6wt

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0663

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0559.html[7/20/2015 8:39:15 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-tafx

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0559

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Bob Fricke

General Comment

Butt out of my retirement planning and regulations concerning my 401-k and IRA-RIRA's. 

You as the USA gov't do a terrible enough job with the Ponzi Scheme Social Security to make us working

 americas sick to our stomachs. Let's fully privatize Social Security first to the TEXAS PLAN and kick govt

 meddling in retirement plans out for good.

Heck No, no more Obama Admin restrictions on MY REAL RETIREMENTS!!!!
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 846 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 846

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
    prescribe a rule that prohibits the importation for disposal of 
polychlorinated biphenyls at concentrations of 50 parts per million or 
                                greater.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2001

  Ms. Rivers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
    prescribe a rule that prohibits the importation for disposal of 
polychlorinated biphenyls at concentrations of 50 parts per million or 
                                greater.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS FOR 
              DISPOSAL.

    Section 6(e) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 
2605(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(6)(A) The Administrator shall promulgate rules to prohibit the 
importation into the United States for disposal of polychlorinated 
biphenyls, or polychlorinated biphenyl items, at concentrations of 50 
parts per million or greater.
    ``(B)(i) The Administrator may use the authority under paragraph 
(3)(B) to accept and consider petitions to exempt from the prohibition 
prescribed under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph specific 
transboundary shipments into the United States for disposal of 
polychlorinated biphenyls, or polychlorinated biphenyl items, at 
concentrations of 50 parts per million or greater.
    ``(ii) In any case in which the Administrator grants an exemption 
pursuant to such a petition, the Administrator shall submit to Congress 
a report containing notice of the exemption and the reasons for the 
exemption. The exemption may not take effect until the expiration of 
the 60-day period beginning on the date the report is received by 
Congress.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 32.500 How are violations of this part determined for recipients other than individuals? A recipient other than an individual is in violation of the requirements of this part if the Secretary of Transportation determines, in writing, that— ( a ) The recipient has violated the requirements of subpart B of this part; or
( b ) The number of convictions of the recipient's employees for violating criminal drug statutes in the workplace is large enough to indicate that the recipient has failed to make a good faith effort to provide a drug-free workplace.
EXHIBIT 21.1





                               OHIO EDISON COMPANY

                     LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                              AT DECEMBER 31, 2001


Pennsylvania Power Company - Incorporated in Pennsylvania

OES Fuel, Incorporated - Incorporated in Ohio

OES Ventures, Incorporated - Incorporated in Ohio

OES Capital, Incorporated - Incorporated in Delaware

OES Finance, Incorporated - Incorporated in Ohio

OES Nuclear, Incorporated - Incorporated in Ohio

Ohio Edison Financing Trust - Incorporated in Delaware

Ohio Edison Financing Trust II - Incorporated in Delaware


                    Statement of Differences
                    ------------------------

Exhibit Number 21, List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant at December 31, 2001,
is not included in the printed document.
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

 
 



 
  
  

					
		  	 Kofax plc
 Beechwood
Chineham Business Park
 Hampshire RG24 8WA
 England
 Registered in England No. 3119779
 VAT No. GB 642 0612 75
	  	  
 Tel: +44 (0) 870 770 4797

Fax: +44 (0) 870 770 4798

www.kofax.com

mailbox.uk@kofax.com


 LETTER OF GRANT 
 Date 
 Employee Name 
 Address 
 City, State, Postal Code 
 Country 
  

	Re:	The KOFAX 2000 Share Option Plan (the “Plan”) 

 Dear Xxxxxxx, 
 I am pleased to inform you that on
                     (the “Date of Grant”) Kofax plc (the “Company”) granted you an option under the Plan in respect of
                 Ordinary Shares in the Company. 
 The Plan is
governed by rules, a copy of which can be obtained from the Company Secretary’s office or the local Finance department on request. 

Details of the option granted to you are set out in the enclosed option certificate. The Plan rules set out the circumstances in which your option may be
exercised. An explanation of these and other provisions of the rules are set out in the enclosed Explanatory Booklet. 
 You should note that,
in addition, your option will only become exercisable if the performance targets set out in the appendix to the enclosed option certificate have been satisfied (unless waived under the Plan rules). 

Regards, 
 For and on behalf of 

Kofax plc
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1202.html[7/22/2015 3:36:14 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-eq3x

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1202

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I did not put this money I earned! Away for my old age FOR YOU TO DECIDED what to do with it. SO I WILL

 THINK ABOUT SPENDING IT AND YOU CAN TAKE CARE OF ME WHEN IM TO OLD TO WORK.

 THANKS FOR BEING ABLE TO TRUST nothing!
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2428

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 12, 1996

Received

AN ACT

To encourage the donation of food and grocery products

to nonprofit organizations for distribution to needy individuals by giving the Model Good Samaritan Food Donation Act the full force and effect of law.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2428 RDS

1 SECTION 1. CONVERSION TO PERMANENT LAW OF MODEL

2 GOOD SAMARITAN FOOD DONATION ACT AND

3 TRANSFER OF THAT ACT TO CHILD NUTRI4 TION ACT OF 1966.

5 (a) CONVERSION TO PERMANENT LAW.—Title IV of

6 the National and Community Service Act of 1990 is

7 amended—

8 (1) by striking sections 401 and 403 (42 U.S.C.

9 12671 and 12673); and

10 (2) in section 402 (42 U.S.C. 12672)—

11 (A) in the section heading, by striking

12 ‘‘MODEL’’ and inserting ‘‘BILL EMERSON’’;

13 (B) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Good

14 Samaritan’’ and inserting ‘‘Bill Emerson Good

15 Samaritan’’; and

16 (C) in subsection (c)—

17 (i) by striking ‘‘A person or gleaner’’

18 and inserting the following:

19 ‘‘(1) LIABILITY OF PERSON OR GLEANER.—A

20 person or gleaner’’;

21 (ii) by striking ‘‘needy individuals,’’

22 and inserting ‘‘needy individuals.’’;

23 (iii) by inserting after ‘‘needy individ24 uals.’’ (as added by clause (ii)) the follow25 ing:
3

HR 2428 RDS

1 ‘‘(2) LIABILITY OF NONPROFIT ORGANIZA2 TION.—A nonprofit organization shall not be subject

3 to civil or criminal liability arising from the nature,

4 age, packaging, or condition of apparently whole5 some food or an apparently fit grocery product that

6 the nonprofit organization received as a donation in

7 good faith from a person or gleaner for ultimate dis8 tribution to needy individuals.’’; and

9 (iv) by striking ‘‘except that this para10 graph’’ and inserting the following:

11 ‘‘(3) EXCEPTION.—Paragraphs (1) and (2)’’.

12 (b) TRANSFER TO CHILD NUTRITION ACT OF

13 1966.—Section 402 of the National and Community Serv14 ice Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12672) (as amended by sub15 section (a))—

16 (1) is transferred from the National and Com17 munity Service Act of 1990 to the Child Nutrition

18 Act of 1966;

19 (2) is redesignated as section 22 of the Child

20 Nutrition Act of 1966; and

21 (3) is added at the end of such Act.

Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21
                                                                    ----------

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF EKCO GROUP, INC.

     The following are the subsidiaries of the registrant, all of which are
wholly-owned except for Woodstream Corporation, which is majority-owned:


                                            Jurisdiction of
Subsidiary Name                             Incorporation
---------------                             ---------------

OPERATING SUBSIDIARIES

Aspen Pet Products, Inc.                    Delaware

B. VIA International Housewares, Inc.       Delaware

Cleaning Specialty Co.                      Tennessee

EKCO Canada Inc.                            Ontario, Canada

EKCO Cleaning, Inc.                         Massachusetts

EKCO Distribution of Illinois, Inc.         Delaware

EKCO International Housewares Limited       United Kingdom

EKCO International, Inc.                    Delaware

EKCO Housewares, Inc.                       Delaware

EKCO Manufacturing of Ohio, Inc.            Delaware

Woodstream Corporation                      Pennsylvania

Wright-Bernet, Inc.                         Ohio


INACTIVE SUBSIDIARIES

APP Holding Corporation                     Delaware

Delhi Manufacturing Corporation             Delaware

EKCO Capital Enterprises, Inc.              Delaware

EKCO Wood Products Co.                      Delaware

Fenwick                                     California

FPI, Inc.                                   Washington

Trappe of Aspen, Inc.                       Pennsylvania
```

[109th Congress Public Law 67]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ067.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 2001]]

Public Law 109-67
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To provide the Secretary of Education with waiver authority for students 
who are eligible for Federal student grant assistance who are adversely 
 affected by a major disaster. <<NOTE: Sept. 21, 2005 -  [H.R. 3668]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Student Grant Hurricane and 
Disaster Relief Act.>> assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 20 USC 1001 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Student Grant Hurricane and Disaster 
Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVERS OF STUDENT GRANT ASSISTANCE REPAYMENT BY STUDENTS 
            AFFECTED BY DISASTERS.

    Section 484B(b)(2) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1091b(b)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(E) Waivers of grant assistance repayment by 
                students affected by disasters.--In addition to the 
                waivers authorized by subparagraph (D), the Secretary 
                may waive the amounts that students are required to 
                return under this section with respect to any other 
                grant assistance under this title if the withdrawals on 
                which the returns are based are withdrawals by 
                students--
                          ``(i) who were residing in, employed in, or 
                      attending an institution of higher education that 
                      is located in an area in which the President has 
                      declared that a major disaster exists, in 
                      accordance with section 401 of the Robert T. 
                      Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 
                      Act (42 U.S.C. 5170);
                          ``(ii) whose attendance was interrupted 
                      because of the impact of the disaster on the 
                      student or the institution; and

[[Page 119 STAT. 2002]]

                          ``(iii) whose withdrawal ended within the 
                      academic year during which the designation 
                      occurred or during the next succeeding academic 
                      year.''.

    Approved September 21, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3668:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Sept. 8, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 15, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: coceans7@aol.com [mailto:coceans7@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:27 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

A strong U.S. needs not only their citizens to have their physical well 

being being cared for but also their mental stability. It should not 

be up to insurance companies to charge more for treatment. Therefore, 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Cecilia Flores 

784 South Canosa Ct. 

Denver, CO 80219
§ 350.309 What are the consequences if a State has provisions that are not compatible? ( a ) *General.* To remain eligible for MCSAP funding, a State may not have in effect or enforce any State law, regulation, standard, or order on CMV safety that the Administrator finds is not compatible (as defined in § 350.105).
( b ) *Process.* FMCSA may initiate a proceeding to withdraw the current CVSP approval or withhold MCSAP funds in accordance with § 350.231 if: ( 1 ) A State enacts a law, regulation, standard, or order on CMV safety that is not compatible;
( 2 ) A State fails to adopt a new or amended FMCSR or HMR within 3 years of its effective date; or
( 3 ) FMCSA finds, based on its own initiative or on a petition of a State or any person, that a State law, regulation, standard, order, or enforcement practice on CMV safety, in either interstate or intrastate commerce, is not compatible.
( c ) *Hazardous materials.* Any decision regarding the compatibility of a State law, regulation, standard, or order on CMV safety with the HMRs that requires an interpretation will be referred to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration of the United States Department of Transportation before proceeding under § 350.231.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 150 (Monday, August 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 43591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3825]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 72 , No. 150 / Monday, August 6, 2007 / 
Notices

[[Page 43591]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Siskiyou County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The siskiyou County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will 
meet in Yreka, California, August 20, 2007. The meeting will include 
routine business and a presentation on the Community Wildfire 
Protection Plan by the Fire Safe Council of Siskiyou County.

DATES: The meeting will be held August 20, 2007, from 4 p.m. until 5:30 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Yreka High School Library, 
Preece Way, Yreka California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob Talley, Forest RAC coordinator, 
Klamath National Forest, (530) 841-4423 or electronically at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e99b9d8885858c90a98f9ac78f8c8dc79c9a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c1b3b5a0adada4b881a7b2efa7a4a5efb4b2">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Public 
comment opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the 
opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

    Dated: July 30, 2007.
Margaret J. Boland,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 07-3825 Filed 8-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
From: Richard Dombrowski, Ph.D. [mailto:rdphd@juno.com] 

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 6:28 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Parity concerns

Comments Regarding Regulatory Guidance USCG-2007-27022 

page 19157, II B specific areas 1 and 4

 

To whom it may concern:

 

I am a licensed clinical psychologist in private practice for 22 years who provides 

neurofeedback treatment to individuals with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Mood 

Disorders. Neurofeedback is an empirically validated and widely recognized effective nonmedication treatment for ADHD, as well as other conditions. There are over 50 studies 

evaluating the effectiveness of neurofeedback in the treatment of ADHD, substance use 

disorders and Autism. A recent review of this literature concluded "Neurofeedback meets the 

American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry criteria for Clinical Guidelines for 

treatment of ADHD." This means that neurofeedback meets the same criteria as medication for 

treating ADHD, of which 60% of prescriptions are in fact prescribed "off label," and that 

neurofeedback "should always be considered as an intervention for this disorder by the 

clinician." 

 

This service has been denied by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, United Behavioral Health, Blue Cross, 

Cigna, and Amerigroup. 

 

This is limitation of an effective and validated treatment for a mental health problem. The 

reasons given by the insurance companies for this denial fell into two categories: 1) our 

company does not cover biofeedback for mental health problems or 2) there is not yet 

sufficient evidence for the efficacy of neurofeedback. As such, they are using evidence-based 

criteria that are far more restrictive for mental health services than the criteria which are used 

for medical/surgical services. There are many routine medical and surgical procedures which 

have far fewer controlled studies about their efficacy than does neurofeedback. These medical 

and surgical procedures are generally not limited because of concerns about how many 

controlled studies have been performed about them. 

 We believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity statute should 

require that employers and plans pay for the same range and scope of services for behavioral 

treatments as they do for medical surgical benefits and that a plan cannot be more restrictive 

in their managed care criteria and reviews for mental health and substance abuse disorders 

when compared to medical surgery. Today plans are being more restrictive in how they review 

evidenced-based mental health and Substance Abuse Treatments when compared to medical 

surgical treatments. This violates both the intent and letter of the parity statute and we hope 

that the regulations will clarify that this can't continue. 

Respectfully yours, 

Richard Dombrowski, Ph.D. 

MI License #6301006528