alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 6/24/15 9:51 PM

Received: June 24, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jlw-trfh

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0333

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Andrew Wayt

Address: 

8011 34th Avenue S

Ste 300

Bloomington, MN, 55425

Email: andy@pilotfinancialmn.com

Phone: 9522298899

General Comment

I am in the process of purchasing a life insurance general agency and the DOL ruling will 

drastically reduce my ability to service and assist the clientele we have. 

We have 3000 clients, most of whom are at or below the federal poverty line. Most have sought 

us out since we do not charge a fee. They recognize that we will be compensated from 

commissions, and after reviewing all of their options, agree that what they purchase is 

acceptable and good for them and their families. 

For every client, we propose all the options from various companies and also what we will be 

compensated on each. By being transparent and forthright with them, their confidence in us is 

made stronger. 

If we have to start charging a fee above and beyond the commissions, clients will not purchase 

insurance products. This will create more families without income after tragedy strikes. 

Page 1 of 2

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b53a49&format=xml&show... 6/24/2015
The suitability standard is a perfectly acceptable way to do business. The few bad agents that 

give us a bad reputation are incredibly uncommon. 

Page 2 of 2

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b53a49&format=xml&show... 6/24/2015
§ 299.323 Continuous welded rail (CWR) plan. ( a ) The railroad shall have in effect and comply with a plan that contains written procedures which address: The installation, adjustment, maintenance, and inspection of CWR; and inspection of CWR joints.
( b ) The railroad shall file its CWR plan with FRA pursuant to § 299.9. The initial CWR plan shall be filed 60 days prior to installation of any CWR track. The effective date of the plan is the date the plan is filed with FRA.
( c ) The railroad's existing plan shall remain in effect until the railroad's new plan is developed and filed with FRA.
#### § 238.437 [Reserved]
Exhibit
31.1

CERTIFICATION

|   | I, Benno Dorer,certify that:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|1. | I have reviewed this
      Amendment No. 1 to this annual report on Form 10-K of The Clorox Company;
      and                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|  
|2  | Based on my
      knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
  report.

|Date: September 30, 2016              
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|                                      
|/s/ Benno Dorer                       
|Benno Dorer                           
|Chairman and Chief Executive
  Officer

---
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 17, 1995 (129), Para 129.32 Leave of Absence]
[Page 1533]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.129.32  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--
  To Mr. CHAMBLISS, for today;
  To Ms. JACKSON-LEE, for today;
  To Mr. VOLKMER, for today; and
  To Mr. TEJEDA, for today and balance of the week.
  And then,
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 179 (Monday, September 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 52952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4456]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11012 and <greek-i>11013]


Ohio Disaster Number OH-00012

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the President declaration of a major 
disaster for the State of Ohio (FEMA-1720-Dr), dated 08/27/2007.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 08/20/2007 and continuing through 08/28/2007.
    Effective Date: 08/28/2007.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/26/2007.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/27/2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Ohio, dated 08/27/2007 is hereby amended 
to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 08/20/
2007 and continuing through 08/28/2007.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 07-4456 Filed 9-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, November 1, 1995 (138), Para 138.5 Committees and Subcommittees to Sit]
[Pages 1822-1823]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.138.5  committees and subcommittees to sit

  On motion of Mrs. WALDHOLTZ, by unanimous consent, the following 
committees and their subcommittees were granted permission to sit today 
during the 5-minute rule: the Committee on Commerce, the Committee on 
Economic and Educational Opportunities, the Committee on International 
Relations, the Committee on the Judiciary,

[[Page 1823]]

the Committee on Science, and the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure.
```
Order entered December 15, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00319-CR

MARCELINO LOPEZ-MARTINEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-83185-2020

ORDER

Before the Court En Banc

Before the Court is appellant’s November 16, 2022 motion for 

reconsideration en banc. Appellant’s motion is DENIED.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
§ 33.70 General provisions. ( a ) The Department of Transportation may take specific official actions for any reason necessary or appropriate to the enforcement or the administration of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes or this part. Such actions include Administrative Subpoenas, Demands for Information, and Inspection Authorizations.
( b ) Any person who places or receives a rated order or an allocation order must comply with the provisions of this part.
( c ) Willful violation of the provisions of title I or Section 705 of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, this part, or an official action of the Department of Transportation, is a criminal act, punishable as provided in the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, and as set forth in section 33.74 of this part.
ALVIN R. SQUIRES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-124

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 12, 2016. 

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Kevin J. Carroll, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Attorney General, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., WETHERELL, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 16, 2021

No. 04-21-00114-CV

Zulema GARZA,

Appellant

v.

Zulema J. GARZA, Jose Juan Garza, III, Andres Garza, Alejandro Garza, and Gabriel Garza,

Appellees

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CVK-002209-D1

Honorable Joe Lopez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On June 28, 2021, we issued an order noting that appellant’s brief was 

late. We ordered appellant to file her brief and a written response explaining her 

failure to timely file the brief by July 13, 2021. In response to our June 28 order, 

appellant filed a letter we construe as a motion for extension of time to file her 

brief. Appellant’s letter stated she is a pro se litigant, explained that she has 

recently been involved in an accident, and requested “an extension of at least 2 

weeks’ time.” 

After consideration, appellant’s request for an extension of time is 

GRANTED. We ORDER appellant to file her brief by July 30, 2021. We 

caution appellant that pro se litigants are held to the same standards as licensed 

attorneys and are required to comply with the applicable rules of procedure. See, 

e.g., Dunlap v. Trois, No. 04-19-00488-CV, 2020 WL 7633952, at *2 (Tex. 

App.—San Antonio Dec. 23, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op.).

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of July, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
§ 179.2 Definitions and abbreviations. ( a ) The following apply in part 179: ( 1 ) *AAR* means Association of American Railroads.
( 2 ) *Approved* means approval by the AAR Tank Car Committee.
( 3 ) *ASTM* means American Society for Testing and Materials.
( 4 ) [Reserved]
( 5 ) Definitions in part 173 of this chapter also apply.
( 6 ) *F* means degrees Fahrenheit.
( 7 ) *NGT* means National Gas Taper Threads.
( 8 ) *NPT* means an American Standard Taper Pipe Thread conforming to the requirements of NBS Handbook H-28 (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter).
( 9 ) [Reserved]
( 10 ) *Tank car facility* means an entity that manufactures, repairs, inspects, tests, qualifies, or maintains a tank car to ensure that the tank car conforms to this part and subpart F of part 180 of this subchapter, that alters the certificate of construction of the tank car, that ensures the continuing qualification of a tank car by performing a function prescribed in parts 179 or 180 of this subchapter, or that makes any representation indicating compliance with one or more of the requirements of parts 179 or 180 of this subchapter.
( 11 ) *Tanks* means tank car tanks.
( b ) [Reserved]
[29 FR 18995, Dec. 20, 1964. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967, and amended by Amdt. 179-10, 36 FR 21344, Nov. 6, 1971; Amdt. 179-50, 60 FR 49076, Sept. 21, 1995; Amdt. 179-50, 61 FR 33255, June 26, 1996; 63 FR 52850, Oct. 1, 1998; 66 FR 45186, 45390, Aug. 28, 2001; 68 fR 75759, Dec. 31, 2003]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 21, 1995 (119), Para 119.24 Submission of Conference Report--H.R. 1977]
[Page 1449]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.119.24  submission of conference report--h.r. 1977

  Mr. REGULA submitted a conference report (Rept. No. 104-259) on the 
bill (H.R. 1977) making appropriations for the Department of Interior 
and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and 
for other purposes; together with a statement thereon, for printing in 
the Record under the rule.
```
§ 246.401 Review board established. ( a ) Any person who has been denied certification or recertification, or has had their certification revoked and believes that a railroad incorrectly determined that they failed to meet the certification requirements of this part when making the decision to deny or revoke certification, may petition the Administrator to review the railroad's decision.
( b ) The Administrator has delegated initial responsibility for adjudicating such disputes to the Certification Review Board (Board). The Board shall be composed of FRA employees.
#### § 228.333 Remedial action.

A railroad shall, within 24 hours after receiving a good faith notice from a camp car occupant or an employee labor organization representing camp car occupants or notice from a Federal Railroad Administration inspector, including a certified State inspector under part 212 of this chapter, of noncompliance with this subpart, correct each non-complying condition on the camp car or cease use of the camp car as sleeping quarters for each occupant. In the event that such a condition affects the safety or health of an occupant, such as, but not limited to, water, cooling, heating, or eating facilities, sanitation issues related to food storage, food handling or sewage disposal, vermin or pest infestation, or electrical hazards, the railroad must immediately upon notice provide alternative arrangements for housing and providing food to the employee or MOW worker until the condition adverse to the safety or health of the occupant(s) is corrected.
#### The New York Automobile Company, Appellant, *v.*Herbert H. Franklin et al., Respondents.

*N. Y. Automobile Co.*v. Franklin, 134 App. Div. 908, affirmed.

(Argued April 27, 1911;

decided May 16, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, *558entered August 21,1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon “a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action for an accounting.

*Will B. Crowley*and *Ceylon H. Lewis*for appellant.

G. *H. Stilwell*for Herbert H. Franklin et al., respondents.

*John W. Suggett*and *Louis L. Waters*for Alexander T. Brown, respondent.

*Theodore E. Hancock*for John Wilkinson, respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cuelen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2479

For the relief of James A. Strickland.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 12, 1995

Mr. ROSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of James A. Strickland.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT FOR ATTORNEYS FEES.

4 The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of

5 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to

6 James A. Strickland of Fayetteville, North Carolina, the

7 sum of $2,745.31. Such sum was paid by James A.

8 Strickland to his attorney for services rendered in connec9 tion with James A. Strickland’s attempt to obtain standby

10 pay from the Veterans Administration for work as a radi11 ology technologist.
2

•HR 2479 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

2 It shall be unlawful for an amount that exceeds 10

3 percent of the sum described in section 1 to be paid to

4 or received by any attorney or agent for services rendered

5 in connection with the claim described in such section. Any

6 person who violates this section shall be guilty of an in7 fraction and shall be subject to a fine in the amount pro8 vided in title 18, United States Code.

Æ
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/14/15 4:11 PM

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyp-4thz

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2217

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: JAMES CARNAGHI

Address: 

MI, 

General Comment

I am a constituent and a licensed financial representative, and I work hard on behalf of my 

middle-income clients every day to help them successfully overcome their financial challenges. 

As such, I am increasingly concerned that the Department of Labors (DOL) proposed retirement 

rule will limit access to one-on-one financial guidance, products, and services, while 

unnecessarily raising clients costs.

We all agree that Americans should be doing more to save for retirement and we should 

encourage savings. However, I have serious concerns about the impact the DOLs proposal will 

have on retirement savers, particularly middle-income families, whether they are in an IRA or a 

401(k). This proposals list of complex restrictions on investor choice will force middle-income 

savers to decide between either moving to accounts that may not suit their needs or preferences, 

or going at it alone without personal assistance from a licensed financial representative. 

Additionally, the DOLs approach limits access to 401(k)s by discouraging small businesses 

from offering employees access to 401(k) options.

Without access to affordable in-person guidance, middle-income Americans will miss out on 

the financial education they need and will save less for retirement. Experts believe this will 

make our retirement savings crisis worse.

I put the best interests of my clients first every day. In my view, the DOL proposal will 

Page 1 of 2

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b82733&format=xml&show... 7/14/2015
unnecessarily limit choice and raise costs for middle-class families. Congress should intervene 

with the DOL to protect middle-income savers choice of retirement products and services that 

empower Americans to save.

I urge that my fellow Americans to support legislation to protect IRAs and middle-income 

retirement choices from the DOL rule.

Page 2 of 2

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b82733&format=xml&show... 7/14/2015
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.19

                                   AMENDMENTS

     WHEREAS, Premcor Inc. previously established the Premcor Senior Executive
Retirement Plan ("Plan") and the Premcor Pension Restoration Plan ("Restoration
Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan and the
Restoration Plan; and

     WHEREAS, all Participants in the Plan have agreed in writing to the
following amendments to the Plan effective as of June 30, 2002;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended to freeze the accrual of all benefits
effective as of June 30, 2002, as follows:

         .   Accrued Earnings earned on or after July 1, 2002 shall be
             disregarded for purposes of the Plan.

         .   Service earned on or after July 1, 2002 shall be taken into account
             only for purposes of Section 2.1.

         .   The only death benefit payable under Section 5.1 shall be a benefit
             which is actuarially equivalent to the benefit the Participant
             would have received if he had retired on the date of his death with
             a fully vested benefit.

         .   The only death benefit payable under Section 5.2 shall be an annual
             benefit equal to 50% of the Participant's normal form of benefit
             (as described in the first sentence of 4.1) upon Retirement for the
             lifetime of the Surviving Spouse; provided that, if a Participant
             received the actuarial equivalent of this benefit upon Retirement
             in the form of a lump sum payment in accordance with a valid
             election as described in Section 4.1, no benefit shall be paid to
             the Surviving Spouse pursuant to Section 5.2.

         .   No benefits shall be payable under Sections 6 or 7.

         .   Section 3.5 shall be replaced with the following:

               "Any benefit payable under this Section 3 shall be offset by an
               amount actuarially equivalent to the benefit, if any, payable to
               the Participant upon his termination of employment under both the
               Premcor Inc. Pension Plan and the Premcor Pension Restoration
               Plan, regardless of whether payment of benefits under such plans
               commence upon his termination of employment. Actuarial equivalent
               shall be determined in accordance with Section 4.2."

                                       1

<PAGE>

          FURTHER, effective June 30, 2002, the Restoration Plan is amended by
deleting Section 4.D.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Premcor Inc. has caused these Amendments to be
executed this 28th day of February, 2003.

                                                PREMCOR INC.



                                                By: /s/ James R. Voss
                                                    -----------------
                                                Name: James R. Voss
                                                Title: Senior Vice President

                                       2