alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 116

Commemorating the dedication and sacrifices of the men and women of

the United States who were killed or disabled while serving as law

enforcement officers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. HEFLEY (for himself, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BARR of Georgia, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. BONIOR, Mr. BORSKI, Mr. BROWN

of Ohio, Mr. CASTLE, Mr. CLEMENT, Mr. COOKSEY, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr.

CRAMER, Mr. EHRLICH, Mr. FERGUSON, Mr. FILNER, Mr. FRANK, Mr.

FROST, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. HORN, Mr.

HYDE, Mr. INSLEE, Mr. ISSA, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. KENNEDY of

Rhode Island, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. KING, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr.

KUCINICH, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. LANTOS, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. MCGOVERN,

Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. MCINNIS, Ms. MCKINNEY, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr.

MOORE, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. PASTOR, Mr.

RODRIGUEZ, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SIMMONS, Mr.

SOUDER, Mr. STUPAK, Mr. SUNUNU, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr.

UDALL of New Mexico, Mr. WALSH, Mr. WOLF, and Mr. WYNN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Commemorating the dedication and sacrifices of the men

and women of the United States who were killed or

disabled while serving as law enforcement officers.

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is

preserved and enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance

and dedication of law enforcement personnel;
2

•HRES 116 IH

Whereas more than 700,000 law enforcement officers, both

men and women, at great risk to their personal safety,

serve their fellow citizens as guardians of peace;

Whereas these peace officers are on the front line in preserving the right of the children of the United States to

receive an education in a crime-free environment, a right

that is all too often threatened by the insidious fear

caused by violence in schools;

Whereas 151 peace officers lost their lives in the line of duty

in 2000, and a total of nearly 15,000 men and women

serving as peace officers have made that supreme sacrifice;

Whereas every year, 1 in 9 peace officers is assaulted, 1 in

25 is injured, and 1 in 4,400 is killed in the line of duty;

Whereas on May 15, 2001, more than 15,000 peace officers

are expected to gather in the Nation’s Capital to join

with the families of their recently fallen comrades to

honor those comrades and all others who went before

them; and

Whereas a Peace Officers Memorial Day on May 15, 2001,

would honor Federal, State, and local law enforcement

officers killed or disabled in the line of duty: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) there should be established a Peace Officers

4 Memorial Day to honor Federal, State, and local law

5 enforcement officers killed or disabled in the line of

6 duty; and
3

•HRES 116 IH

1 (2) the President should issue a proclamation

2 calling upon the people of the United States to

3 honor and recognize such officers with appropriate

4 ceremonies and respect.

Æ
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPhotoresponse of YBa2Cu3O(7-delta) granular and epitaxial superconducting thin filmsThe response is reported of thin films of YBa2Cu3O(7-delta) with either a very grainy or a smooth epitaxial morphology to visible radiation. SrTiO3 substrates were employed for both types of films. The grainy films were formed by sequential multi-layer electron beam evaporation while the epitaxial films were formed by laser ablation. Both films were patterned into H shaped detectors via a negative photolithographic process employing a Br/ethanol etchant. The bridge region of the H was 50 microns wide. The patterned films formed by laser ablation and sequential evaporation had critical temperatures of 74 K and 72 K respectively. The bridge was current biased and illuminated with chopped He-Ne laser radiation and the voltage developed in response to the illumination was measured. A signal was detected only above the critical temperature and the peak of the response coincided with the resistive transition for both types of films although the correspondence was less exact for the grainy film. The details of the responses and their analysis are presented.Document ID19900013416Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsValco, G. J.*(Ohio State Univ. Columbus., United States)*Claspy, P.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH., United States)*Warner, J. D.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH., United States)*Varaljay, N.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH., United States)*Bhasin, K. B.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryElectronics And Electrical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:103144NASA-TM-103144E-5496Meeting InformationMeeting: Technical Symposium on Optical Engineering and Photonics in Aerospace SensingLocation: Orlando, FLCountry: United StatesStart Date: April 16, 1990End Date: April 20, 1990Sponsors:Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation EngineersAccession Number90N22732Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC3-105Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013416.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 241.15 Penalties and other consequences for noncompliance. ( a ) Any person who violates any requirement of this part or causes the violation of any such requirement is subject to a civil penalty of at least $1,086 and not more than $35,516 per violation, except that: Penalties may be assessed against individuals only for willful violations, and, where a grossly negligent violation or a pattern of repeated violations has created an imminent hazard of death or injury to persons, or has caused death or injury, a penalty not to exceed $142,063 per violation may be assessed. Each day a violation continues shall constitute a separate offense.
( b ) An individual who violates any requirement of this part or causes the violation of any such requirement may be subject to disqualification from safety-sensitive service in accordance with part 209 of this chapter.
( c ) A person who knowingly and willfully falsifies a record or report required by this part may be subject to criminal penalties under 49 U.S.C. 21311.
[67 FR 75960, Dec. 10, 2002, as amended at 69 FR 30595, May 28, 2004; 72 FR 51198, Sept. 6, 2007; 73 FR 79704, Dec. 30, 2008; 77 FR 24423, Apr. 24, 2012; 81 FR 43112, July 1, 2016; 82 FR 16135, Apr. 3, 2017; 83 FR 60750, Nov. 27, 2018; 84 FR 37075, July 31, 2019; 86 FR 1760, Jan. 11, 2021; 86 FR 23256, May 3, 2021; 87 FR 15870, Mar. 21, 2022; 88 FR 1129, Jan. 6, 2023; 88 FR 89564, Dec. 28, 2023]
-----Original Message----- 

From: borlik@access.k12.ca.us [mailto:borlik@access.k12.ca.us] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:26 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Beth Orlik 

PO Box 55072 

Irvine, CA 92619
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0662.html[7/21/2015 8:09:51 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-3f7q

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0662

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Catherine Berry

General Comment

if you plan to mess with our retirements you better be prepared to accept the same one.
§ 271.9 Penalties and responsibility for compliance. ( a ) Any person that violates any requirement of this part or causes the violation of any such requirement is subject to a civil penalty of at least the minimum civil monetary penalty and not more than the ordinary maximum civil monetary penalty per violation, except that: Penalties may be assessed against individuals only for willful violations, and, where a grossly negligent violation or a pattern of repeated violations has created an imminent hazard of death or injury to individuals, or has caused death or injury, a penalty not to exceed the aggravated maximum civil monetary penalty per violation may be assessed. *See* 49 CFR part 209, appendix A. Each day a violation continues shall constitute a separate offense. Any person that knowingly and willfully falsifies a record or report required by this part may be subject to criminal penalties under 49 U.S.C. 21311. See FRA's website at *www.fra.dot.gov* for a statement of agency civil penalty policy.
( b ) Although the requirements of this part are stated in terms of the duty of a railroad, when any person, including a contractor or subcontractor to a railroad, performs any function covered by this part, that person (whether or not a railroad) shall perform that function in accordance with this part.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1042.html[7/22/2015 6:56:06 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-wum8

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1042

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jeff T

General Comment

Please stop meddling with my financials. I can plan my own retirement. It's none of your business to get

 involved. The government already controls what I eat, how much I make, my health care, and now want to

 restrict how I can spend my own money during retirement.

Tell you what, once every government employee, every member of congress, and every member of the senate

 have to live by the same rules as me, then we'll talk. Until then, please leave me and my finances alone.

Thanks,

Jeff T.
Exhibit 31.2

I, Richard O. Faria, certify that: 

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Scientific Technologies Incorporated;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): 

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and 

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:        August 14, 2006
/s/ Richard Faria
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7058

COREY LAMONDE JAMES,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

FRED NASTRI, HO; JOSEPH F. NEDER, Ex-Warden NBCI; DAVID 

WILHELM, Sgt.; WARDEN BOBBY SHEARIN; JOHN ROWLEY, 

Ex-Warden; BRIAN MOORE, Ex-CO II NBCI; DAVE COWEN, Ex-Sgt. 

NBCI; J. E. COMBS, Ex-CO II NBCI; MAXINE BRYANT; AL DAVIS, 

HO,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District 

Judge. (8:10-cv-02272-AW)

Submitted: December 15, 2011 Decided: December 20, 2011

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corey Lamonde James, Appellant Pro Se. Glen William Bell, OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Corey Lamonde James appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. James v. Nastri, No. 8:10-cv-02272-AW (D. Md. filed 

July 13, 2011 & entered July 14, 2011). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
-----Original Message----- 

From: slgreek@gmail.com [mailto:slgreek@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 9:05 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Shannon Greek 

230 auburn st 

auburndale, MA 02466
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2288 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 200
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2288

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 28 (legislative day, September 25), 1995

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

           September 29 (legislative day, September 25), 1995

                Reported by Mr. Roth, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security Act to extend for 2 
 years the deadline by which States are required to have in effect an 
 automated data processing and information retrieval system for use in 
    the administration of State plans for child and spousal support.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTOMATION DEADLINE.

    (a) In General.--Section 454(24) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 654(24)) is amended by striking ``1995'' and inserting ``1997''.
    (b) Technical Amendments Related to the Repeal of Federal 
Funding.--Section 452 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 652) is amended in each of 
subsections (d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(A), (d)(2)(B), and (e), by striking 
``455(a)(1)(B)'' and inserting ``454(16)''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 200

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2288

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security Act to extend for 2 
 years the deadline by which States are required to have in effect an 
 automated data processing and information retrieval system for use in 
    the administration of State plans for child and spousal support.

_______________________________________________________________________

           September 29 (legislative day, September 25), 1995

                       Reported without amendment
```
Date Completed: 7/20/2015 

Name: James Crowder

Street Address: 1907 Ashford Ave

City: Muscatine State: Iowa Zip Code: 52761

Email: jim@jccrowder.com

Comments:

Dear Thomas Perez, I'm writing to urge the Department of Labor to reconsider the

proposed fiduciary rule that will significantly hurt the ability of many Americans to

save for retirement. This rule could even completely cut them off from receiving

investment advice. Under this proposed rule, many Americans who most need

access to quality and affordable retirement advice will lose it. The rule will impose

complex regulatory hurdles on financial advisors that would require significant, costly

changes to their business models. As a result, some advisors will reduce services to

individuals and small businesses that provide more than 9 million households

retirement plans. The rule will push financial advisors away from small businesses

and small balance accounts, leaving many Americans with no access to retirement

advice at all. The DOL must realize that its actions will seriously hurt small

businesses' ability to provide retirement savings options to employees and prevent

retail investors from receiving needed, affordable investment advice. The reality of

the fiduciary rule is that it will do more harm than good at a time when Americans

around the country cannot afford to put their retirement savings at risk. Rather than

proceeding down a too-costly regulatory path, the government should consider more

carefully whether there may exist prudent alternatives to achieve the desired

protections and benefits for retirement investors. I strongly oppose the rule, and urge

DOL to reconsider. Sincerely, James Crowder Retired 1907 Ashford Avenue

Muscatine, IA 52761
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 11:48 AM

Received: July 14, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyu-7tud

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2230

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I don't want the government controlling my money or my retirement. I am smart enough to plan 

for that myself and frankly think I can do a far better job on my worst day than the government 

can on their best day. Frankly, it's very patronizing for a government agency to purport to be able 

to plan an individual's retirement better than the individual him/herself can.

In addition, this regulation would almost certainly lead to fewer investment choices for 

individuals, which is never a good thing, and that would especially be the case for smaller 

investors. The advisers most likely affected by this will either have to charge higher fees, which 

would hurt smaller investors that don't have the same kind of money to handle those added 

charges, or they will move into a different role and require a higher minimum investment.

Americans are smarter than the government gives us credit for. Perhaps if the government put its 

energy towards protecting us instead of telling us how to live our lives, we would be much better 

off than we are now and Americans might trust our government more.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 25, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-73

Lower Tribunal No. 06-152-A-M

________________

Terrance Howard,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, James W. Morgan, III, 

Judge.

Terrance Howard, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY, and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.