alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned, Mason N. Carter, Chief Executive Officer of Merrimac
Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
              ending June 29, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
              Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), fully
              complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
              Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
              in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



  /s/ Mason N. Carter
-------------------------
  Mason N. Carter
  Chief Executive Officer
  August 13, 2002

         The undersigned, Robert V. Condon, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
              Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
              in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



 /s/ Robert V. Condon
------------------------
Robert V. Condon
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*James Butler, Incorporated, Appellant.

*People v. Butler, Inc.,*134 App. Div. 151, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted December 15, 1910;

decided December 16, 1910.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 8, 1909, reversing a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor of defendant and granting a new trial in an action to recover a penalty for an alleged violation of sections 164 and 165 of chapter 338 of the Laws of 1893, as amended by chapter 524 of the Laws of 1903 and chapter 100 of the Laws of 1905.

*John H. Rogan*for appellant.

*Edward R.*O'Malley, *Attorney-General (Taylor More*of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
WILLIAM RINGWOOD

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 3228

_______ ______________________/

Opinion filed November 29, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Marianne L. Aho , Judge

.

William Ringwood, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorney

General, T allahassee , for App ellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1008.html[7/22/2015 6:27:34 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-jvx5

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1008

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Marivel Guzman

General Comment

I worked hard for my money and you shouldn't have to tell us how to spend are money when we retire
§ 373.101 For-hire, non-exempt motor carrier bills of lading. Every motor carrier subject to § 373.100 shall issue a receipt or bill of lading for property tendered for transportation in interstate or foreign commerce containing the following information: ( a ) Names of consignor and consignee.
( b ) Origin and destination points.
( c ) Number of packages.
( d ) Description of freight.
( e ) Weight, volume, or measurement of freight (if applicable to the rating of the freight).
The carrier shall keep a record of this information as prescribed in 49 CFR part 379. [55 FR 11198, Mar. 27, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 30874, July 8, 1991; 62 FR 15423, Apr. 1, 1997; 81 FR 68345, Oct. 4, 2016]
#### § 236.505 Proper operative relation between parts along roadway and parts on locomotive.

Proper operative relation between the parts along the roadway and the parts on the locomotive shall obtain under all conditions of speed, weather, wear, oscillation, and shock.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,323
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             495
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                24,800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      5,764
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           5,698
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             5,702
<LOANS>                                        143,297
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,822
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,173
<DEPOSITS>                                     188,020
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,094
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,963
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 205,173
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,356
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  187
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   206
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,749
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 755
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 755
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,994
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      150
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,524
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    592
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         592
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       376
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,637
<LOANS-PAST>                                        71
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,737
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       66
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,822
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 192

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

#### § 192.377 Service lines: Copper.

Each copper service line installed within a building must be protected against external damage.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPultrusion Process Development for Long Space Boom ModelLong flexible-boom models were required to develop ground-vibration test methods for very-low-frequency space structures with applications to the proposed Space Station. Pultruded quasi-isotropic composite beams were selected as an option over extruded aluminum alloy structures because of the lower cost potential, the higher specific strength, the flexural properties, and the dynamic similarity considerations. The reinforcement material that was used was biaxial (0 deg/90 deg) fiberglass roving held in place with knitted polyester yarn such that equal fiber volume in 0 deg and 90 deg orientations provided nearly equal strength in both longitudinal and transverse directions. An isophthalic polyester resin system was used as the matrix. Continuous lengths up to 270 ft were easily pultruded with biaxial fabric. Tracking problems were encountered with similar unidirectional fabrics. Analyses of processing problems were conducted to determine causes for delamination, scaling, and sloughing. Ultrasonic C-scanning and scanning electron microscope examinations were conducted as well as mechanical testing to failure. Test results indicate that pultrusion processes can be used to produce quasi-isotropic composite structures.Document ID19900013312Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsWilson, Maywood L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Miserentino, Robert*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1988Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberL-16365NAS 1.15:4017NASA-TM-4017Meeting InformationMeeting: Annual Conference of the Society of the Plastics Industry Reinforced Plastics/Composites Inst.Location: Atlanta, GACountry: United StatesStart Date: January 27, 1986End Date: January 31, 1986Accession Number90N22628Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-53-43Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013312.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 25.510 Recruitment. ( a ) *Nondiscriminatory recruitment and hiring.* A recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in the recruitment and hiring of employees. Where a recipient has been found to be presently discriminating on the basis of sex in the recruitment or hiring of employees, or has been found to have so discriminated in the past, the recipient shall recruit members of the sex so discriminated against so as to overcome the effects of such past or present discrimination.
( b ) *Recruitment patterns.* A recipient shall not recruit primarily or exclusively at entities that furnish as applicants only or predominantly members of one sex if such actions have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 25.500 through 25.550.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 14

- 00510

- CV EX PARTE Mark VI LLARREAL From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 04491 Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: January 21, 2015 AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART Mark Villarreal appeals the trial court’s order denying his petitio n for expunction. Currently before us is a joint motion filed by Villarreal and the Texas Department of Public Safety requesting that we (1) affirm the trial court’s judgment as it pertains to the arrest on October 6,
2007 for Possession of M arijuana ; (2) reverse the portion of the judgment denying an expunction of the arrest on August 7, 2008 for Theft of Property; and (3) render judgment granting an expunction of the August 7, 2008 arrest records. We do not have the authority to make the requested findings in this matter. See Tex. Dep’t of Pub. Safety v. Trautmann , No. 04

- 96

- 00786 , 1996 WL 721950, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Dec. 11, 1996, no writ) (not designated for publication). According ly, we grant the motion in part, a ffirm the order denyin g the petition for

e xpunction as it pertains to the October 6, 2007 arrest , reverse the order of expunction as it relates04

- 14

- 00510

- CV to the August 7, 2008 arrest, and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2 (d ). Costs of the appeal are taxed against Villarreal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”).

PER CURIAM

- 2

-
BART Baghouse Module Cost Analysis 2008

Days of Operation 272 PM10 Emission rate 10.58 lbs/hrRemoval Efficiency 99.0% tons / ye

Reactant 0 tons

Site preparation (structural) 100,000 $ Cost of reactant delivered per lb

Baghouse Module 1,200,000 $ Total Reactant Costs $ -

Electrical 200,000 $ Instumentation 100,000 $ tonsRentals 40,000 $ 30 $ $ per to

Lost profit from Fly Ash - $ 

Sub Total Equip Design and Installation $ 1,640,000

Increased Solid Waste , tons/yr tons peSolid Waste Disposal Costs $/ton 4.00 $ $ per to

Annual Disposal Costs - $ 

Electricity requirement, kw 5.50 $ Electrical costs $/kw 0.10 $ 

$ Total Annual Electrical Costs 3,590 - $ 

Operating Labor 1 hour pSupervisor 15% of Maintenance Labor 22,544 $ 0.8% of 

Indirect - Engineering $200,000 Maintenance Materials 33,816 $ 1.2% of 

Indirect - Construction Management $400,000 Overhead 33,816 $ 

60% of maint m

Indirect - Startup and Testing $200,000 Property Tax 28,180 $ 1% of toIndirect - Owner Management $50,000 Insurance 56,360 $ 2% of to

Contingency@ 20% of equipment costs $328,000 Administration 56,360 $ 2% of to

Capital Recovery 265,999 $ 7% @ 2

Total Capital Cost $ Total Annual Costs 501,000 2,818,000 $ 

PM10 Emissions before Control 0.00Emission Reduction % 0.0%Emission Reduction Tons / year 0.00

Cost Effectiveness $ per Ton PM Removed over 20 years N/A

Capital Costs (installed cost) Annual Costs

Annualized Capital and O&M Costs

Key Design Considerations & Costs

Indirect costs
BART Dry ESP Cost Analysis 2008

Days of Operation 272 Emission rate 10.58 lbsRemoval Efficiency 99.0% 0.0 tonSite preparation (removal of existing baghouse equip) $ 600,000 Reactant 0 ton

Building 600,000 $ Cost of reactant delivered peWet ESP Equipment(1) $ 8,276,521 Total Reactant Costs $ -

ElectricalInstumentation tonRentals $ $ p

30

Sub Total Equip Design and Installation $ Lost profit from Fly Ash - 9,476,521 $ 

Increased Solid Waste , tons/yr 0 tonSolid Waste Disposal Costs $/ton 4.00 $ $ p

Ductwork modifications $ 1,200,000 Annual Disposal Costs - $ 

New ID fans and Electrical Power upgrades $ 750,000

Electricity requirement, kw 50.50 $ 

$ 1,950,000 Electrical costs $/kw 0.10 $ 

Total Annual Electrical Costs 32,966 $ Operating Labor 24,480.00 $ 1 hSupervisor 3,672 $ 15% Maintenance Labor 116,496 $ 0.8

Indirect - Engineering $200,000 Maintenance Materials 174,744 $ 1.2

Indirect - Construction Management $400,000 Overhead 191,635 $ 

60% lab

Indirect - Startup and Testing $200,000 Property Tax 145,620 $ 1% 

Indirect - Owner Management $50,000 Insurance 291,240 $ 2% 

Contingency@ 20% of equipment costs $2,285,304 Administration 291,240 $ 2% 

Capital Recovery 1,374,550 $ 7% 

Total Capital Cost $ Total Annual Costs 2,647,000 14,562,000 $ 

PM Emissions before Control 0.00Emission Reduction % 99.0%Emission Reduction Tons / year 0.00

1) Based on EPA cost fact sheet, range $20 to $125 dollars (2002 dollars) per dscf used 60 @ 73000 dscf

Cost Effectiveness $ per Ton PM Removed over 20 years N/A

Capital Costs (installed cost) Annual Costs

Annualized Capital and O&M Costs

Key Design Considerations & Costs

Indirect costs
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/18/15 9:58 PM

Received: July 15, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jzy-miz7

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2365

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Angie Anonymous

General Comment

I'm doing very well planning for my own retirement. I don't need nor want government 

assistance in doing so. As a matter of fact, Social security is a joke and I would much rather keep 

my money that goes into that fund and put it into my regular 401B plan. 

I would like to make another suggestion on this page since I don't know where else to put it. I 

know several parents who are receiving social security benefits just because their child has been 

diagnosed with a minor disability. This is ridiculous. These parents need to take responsibility 

for these children without the assistance of the government. Especially when the parents are 

working and earning a good wage. These parents are receiving this money even though the child 

may require only minimal assistance from school and there is no assistance needed outside of 

school or additional medical attention. What a WASTE of our tax dollars. This just isn't okay. If 

my child has a traumatic event or a crisis that requires a lot of medical attention or thousands of 

dollars of hospital bills, I don't get any extra assistance. I'm expected to go broke paying the bills 

because my child is my responsibility. Do you even realize how much money from taxpayers is 

being on instances such as these. People shouldn't receive government assistance just for a 

simple diagnosis. It would also be a good idea to get have a second physician agree with the 

diagnosis. 
Another issue that needs dealt with is the EBT card or known in the past as food stamps. Why 

should people with these get to buy whatever they want with them? Pop and candy items aren't a 

necessity and is a waste. They provide no nutritional value. These people eat better than 

everyone else because we can't afford to buy the good food such as steaks and seafood but those 

with EBT cards don't have to worry about how much they cost cause the rest of us are footing the 

bill. I just think that what is purchased on EBT cards should be nutritional food only. This has 

gotten way out of hand. If you think that people aren't still "selling" their food stamps, you are 

wrong. 50 cents is given to people in cash for every $1 of groceries. We need to stop making 

people so dependent on others and government (tax payer) money. This is getting so out of hand. 

It is making it impossible for those who are working hard to try and make it, let alone get ahead 

in life.
§ 37.185 Fleet accessibility requirement for OTRB fixed-route systems of large operators. Each large operator subject to the requirements of § 37.183 shall ensure that— ( a ) By October 30, 2006 no less than 50 percent of the buses in its fleet with which it provides fixed-route service are readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs.
( b ) By October 29, 2012, 100 percent of the buses in its fleet with which it provides fixed-route service are readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs.
( c ) *Request for time extension.* An operator may apply to the Secretary for a time extension of the fleet accessibility deadlines of this section. If he or she grants the request, the Secretary sets a specific date by which the operator must meet the fleet accessibility requirement. In determining whether to grant such a request, the Secretary considers the following factors: ( 1 ) Whether the operator has purchased or leased, since October 30, 2000, enough new OTRBs to replace 50 percent of the OTRBs with which it provides fixed-route service by October 30, 2006 or 100 percent of such OTRBs by October 29, 2012;
( 2 ) Whether the operator has purchased or leased, between October 28, 1998 and October 30, 2000, a number of new inaccessible OTRBs significantly exceeding the number of buses it would normally obtain in such a period;
( 3 ) The compliance with all requirements of this part by the operator over the period between October 28, 1998 and the request for time extension.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6655
LOUIS CARL JEMISON, III, Petitioner - Appellant, v. U.S. MARSHALS; ALBERTO GONZALES; PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:07-cv-00403-HEH) Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 25, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Louis Carol Jemison, III, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Louis Carl Jemison, III, appeals the district court order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court memorandum order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Jemison v. U.S. Marshals , No. 3:07-cv-00403-HEH (E.D. Va. Feb. 20, 2008). We deny Jemison’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
-----Original Message----- 

From: demawatt@aol.com [mailto:demawatt@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:20 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Maria Watt 

1264 Monterey Ave. 

Berkeley, CA 94707