alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 27, 2015

Mr. Agustin Chavez Jr.

2572 Jimmy Taylor Dr.

Perris, CA 92570

Dear Mr. Chavez Jr.:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 6, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2711), but 

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, 

you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 35.1





COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


OF


OHIO EDISON COMPANY, AS SERVICER


The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the duly elected and acting Vice President and Treasurer of Ohio Edison Company, as servicer (the “ Servicer ”) under the Phase-In-Recovery Property Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2013 (the “ Servicing Agreement ”), between the Servicer and OE Funding LLC, as Bond Issuer, and further certifies on behalf of the Servicer that:


|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement during the period that commenced January 1, 2018 and ended December 31, 2018 has been made under the supervision of the undersigned pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Servicing Agreement; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Servicing Agreement throughout the period that commenced January 1, 2018 and ended December 31, 2018.

Executed as of this 29th day of March 2019.





OHIO EDISON COMPANYBy:/s/ Steven R. StaubName:Steven R. StaubTitle:Vice President and Treasurer
Editorial Note on Part 381
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 381 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 381.410 What may I do if I have an idea or suggestion for a pilot program? ( a ) You may send a written statement (for example, a typed or handwritten (printed) letter) to the Administrator, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
( b ) You should identify the persons or class of persons who would be covered by the pilot program exemptions. Your letter should include: ( 1 ) Your name, job title, mailing address, and daytime telephone number;
( 2 ) The name of the individuals or motor carrier that would be responsible for the use or operation of CMVs covered by the pilot program, if there are motor carriers that have expressed an interest in participating in the program;
( 3 ) Principal place of business for the motor carrier (street address, city, State, and zip code); and
( 4 ) The USDOT identification number for the motor carrier.
( c ) You should provide a written statement that: ( 1 ) Presents your estimate of the potential benefits to the motor carrier industry, the FMCSA, and the general public if the pilot program is conducted, and describes how you developed your estimate;
( 2 ) Estimates of the amount of time that would be needed to conduct the pilot program (e.g., the time needed to complete the collection and analysis of data);
( 3 ) Identifies the regulation from which the participants would need to be exempted;
( 4 ) Recommends a reasonable number of participants necessary to yield statistically valid findings;
( 5 ) Provides ideas or suggestions for a monitoring plan to ensure that participants comply with the terms and conditions of participation;
( 6 ) Provides ideas or suggestions for a plan to protect the health and safety of study participants and the general public.
( 7 ) Assesses the safety impacts the pilot program exemption may have; and
( 8 ) Provides recommendations on how the safety measures in the pilot project would be designed to achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety that would be obtained by complying with the regulation.
( d ) Your recommendation should include a copy of all research reports, technical papers, publications and other documents you reference.
[63 FR 67608, Dec. 8, 1998, as amended at 72 FR 55700, Oct. 1, 2007; 78 FR 58479, Sept. 24, 2013]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 28, 1995 (122), Para 122.20 Submission of Conference Report--S. 895]
[Page 1464]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.122.20  submission of conference report--s. 895

  Mrs. MEYERS submitted a conference report (Rept. No. 104-269) on the 
bill of the Senate (S. 895) to amend the Small Business Act to reduce 
the level of participation by the Small Business Administration in 
certain loans guaranteed by the Administration, and for other purposes; 
together with a statement thereon, for printing in the Record under the 
rule.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: gumnutbaby2@sbcglobal.net [mailto:gumnutbaby2@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:15 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Charles Drake 

917 N Perry Ave 

Wichita, KS 67203
#### § 29.101 How does a Tribe commence negotiations for a compact, funding agreement, or amendment?

After the Department notifies a Tribe in writing that it is eligible to participate in the Program pursuant to § 29.100, the Tribe must submit a written request to the Self-Governance Official to begin negotiating a compact and funding agreement. A Tribe participating in the Program may submit a written request to the Self-Governance Official at any time to begin negotiating an amendment. A Tribe may send the request to *ttsgp@dot.gov* or use any other method that provides receipt.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 04617

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

04617\04617_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 04617\04617_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04617\04617_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04617\04617_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04617\04617_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04617\04617_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04617\04617_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04617\Certification Statement Plant ID 04617.pdf Plant certification statement

x 04617\Supplemental Documents\04617 Part E Corrections Email.pdf Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents.

x 04617\Supplemental Documents\04617_McManus Diagram D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04617\Supplemental Documents\04617_McManus Diagram WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04617\Supplemental Documents\04617_McManus Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04617\Supplemental Documents\04617_McManus Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04617\Supplemental Documents\04617_McManus transmittal letter.pdf Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents.

x 04617\Supplemental Documents\04617_Part E Corrections Email 2.pdf Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents.

x 04617\Supplemental Documents\04617_Part E2-1 supplemental responses.pdf Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents.

x 04617\04617_Checklist_102010_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04617\04617_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0579.html[7/20/2015 9:22:29 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-ib4e

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0579

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: William Latta

General Comment

President Bush and his cronie did more to destroy my retirement. Because of Bush and Frist, and Hastert I was

 on of my pension by the Thieving Texan Christians. I worked for a company for over twenty years and

 the next thing I know the company is merged with another company and because of the pension law changes by

 the Corporate Republican my pension is gone and I am left with nothing.

Where was you outrage when Bush and the rest of your thieving Republican where steling everything

 from working poeple.

Where????
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Special Medical Advisory Group will meet on October 12, 2007 in Room 830 from 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. at VA Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The meeting is open to the public. 

The purpose of the Group is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Under Secretary for Health on the care and treatment of disabled veterans, and other matters pertinent to the Department's Veterans Health Administration (VHA). 

The agenda for the meeting will include discussion of VHA's public relations campaign, an update on the budget, an update on information technology security, a briefing on relationships between VA and the Department of Defense, and an update on academic affiliations. 

Any member of the public wishing to attend should contact Juanita Leslie, Designated Federal Officer, Office of Administrative Operations (10B2), Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs at (202) 461-7019. No time will be set aside at this meeting for receiving oral presentations from the public. Statements, in written form, may be submitted to Juanita Leslie before the meeting or within 10 days after the meeting. 

Dated: August 27, 2007.

By Direction of the Secretary. 

E. Philip Riggin, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 07-4278  Filed 8-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
#### NEW YORK ELEVATED RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, *v.*DELAPLAINE McDANIEL, Respondent, Impleaded with THE PHILADELPHIA ARCHITECTURAL COMPANY.

*Costs*— *where on a tried before a referee the plaintiff recovers a judgment against one of the defendants only, the other defendant can only have costs awarded to him upon a motion to the court*— *Code of Cwil Procedure, seas.*1018,3229.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant McDaniel, and against the plaintiff, dismissing the complaint as to said McDaniel and for $261.48 costs. The judgment having been entered upon the report of a referee, and also from an order made at a Special Term awarding costs and an extra allowance to the defendant McDaniel.

The claim made was for the recovery of $1,106.88 over-paid under a contract made by the plaintiff with the Philadelphia Architectural Company for the material required for building certain stairways for passenger stations on the road of the plaintiff.

The court at Q-eneral Term, after approving of the finding of the referee that the defendant McDaniel, to whom the Philadelphia Architectural Company had assigned the contract, was not bound to refund the payment made to his assignor, said : *“*After the determination of the action, the defendant McDaniel moved the court for costs in his favor, and upon the hearing of the parties an order to that effect was made, but the right to make it has been denied because of the omission of the referee by his report to adjudge costs in favor of this defendant. This, however, was not one of the subjects which, by section 1018 of the Code, appears to have been committed to the determination of the referee. The authority, on the contrary, was confided expressly to the discretion of the court *311by section 3229 of the Code, and that has been considered tbe proper course of proceeding for this purpose under provisions similar to those contained in the present Code. *(Bank of Attica*v. *Wolf,*18 How., 102; *Lindslay*v. *Deafmdorf,*43 id., 90; *Williams*v. *Blumer,*49 id., 12.)

*“*The allowance of cost to the defendant McDaniel was within the authority expressly given in this matter to the • court over a case of this description. But as there was nothing difficult or extraordinary in the action or the defense, the additional allowance of $175 was not authorized. To this extent the order requires to be corrected, and it should as to the allowance be reversed, and with that qualification the judgment should be affirmed and the residue of the order should be also affirmed, without costs.”

*Deyo, Duer c& Bauerdorf,*for the appellant.

*Charles W. Seymour,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Daniels, J.;

Davis, P. J., and Brady, J., concurred.

Judgment modified as directed in opinion and affirmed as modified, without costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Docket No. 33-2007]

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Elizabeth Whiteman at                         *Elizabeth_Whiteman@ita.doc.gov*                         or (202) 482-0473.                    

Dated: August 3, 2007.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 07-3940 Filed 8-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1093.html[7/22/2015 10:55:28 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-x2o7

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1093

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Guillermo Rodriguez

General Comment

I have worked hard for my retirement money, I am fiscally responsible, I do not need advisors or more control

 regulations from any branch of government. Do not touch my retirement income.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0531.html[7/20/2015 8:17:13 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-wa0u

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0531

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Ryan Moczulski

Address:

355 N Main St

Wilkes Barre, PA, 18702

Email: rfm138@yahoo.com

General Comment

Leave our retirement funds alone. You politicians have plunged our future into debt and we know what's best for

 ourselves. The government can't competently manage ANYTHING!
§ 243.107 Training program submission, introductory information required. ( a ) An employer who provides or is responsible for the training of safety-related railroad employees shall submit its training program to FRA for review and approval. Each employer shall state in its submission whether, at the time of filing, it: ( 1 ) Primarily conducts the training program of its own safety-related railroad employees, utilizing its own resources;
( 2 ) Conducts any training for other than its own safety-related railroad employees;
( 3 ) Implements any training programs conducted by some other entity on its behalf but adopted by that employer;
( 4 ) Qualifies safety-related railroad employees previously qualified by other employers;
( 5 ) Qualifies safety-related railroad employees previously trained by training organizations or learning institutions; or
( 6 ) Any combination of paragraph (a)(1) through (5) of this section.
( b ) An employer who utilizes any of the options specified in paragraphs (a)(2) through (5) of this section shall provide the following information in its submission: ( 1 ) The categories of safety-related railroad employees who, at the time of filing, will receive training utilizing one or more of these options; and
( 2 ) Whether the training delivered, utilizing one or more of these options, composes all or part of the overall training program regimen for that category of employee at the time of filing.
( c ) An employer that elects to use training organizations or learning institutions to train some or all of its safety-related railroad employees, or to hire new safety-related railroad employees that have previously received training from any training organizations or learning institutions, shall include the full name of the training organization or learning institution in its submission.
From: Dan J. Wintz [mailto:Dan.Wintz@koleyjessen.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 5:51 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

I write in support of the Department’s Proposed Rule on “Definition of the Term ‘Fiduciary’; 

Conflict of Interest Rule – Retirement Investment Advice” (RIN 1210-AB32). The Department 

has and will receive many comments that the Proposed Rule is too broad, and that compliance 

requirements are too onerous and costly. The value of disclosure of conflicted advice and the 

expected compensation to be received by a person providing advice to retirement plan 

fiduciaries and to persons whom are often unsophisticated plan participants and IRA owners 

must also be (and has been reasonably) considered by the Department. 

Based on literally thousands of experiences in my practice where inappropriate products have 

been sold based on the best interests of the seller, I believe that the the value of the Proposed 

Rule and its disclosures and information collection requirements are not only appropriate but 

far outweigh the cost of compliance; a level of duty and disclosure that applies in almost all 

areas relating to retirement benefits, which has not caused the ruination of the retirement 

provider industry, and that has promoted retirement security.

I urge the Department to adopt the Proposed Rule.

Dan Wintz 

Dan J. Wintz | Attorney

Koley Jessen P.C., L.L.O. | 1125 S. 103rd St., Suite 800 | Omaha, NE 68124

402.343.3780 Direct | 402.390.9005 Fax

Dan.Wintz@koleyjessen.com | www.koleyjessen.com