alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
of CNA Financial Corporation
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  
    
    the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed on
the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: February 22, 2011
    
    By
    
    /s/ Thomas F. MotamedThomas F. Motamed 
Chief Executive Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

S an Antonio, Texas

June 28, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00410

- CR

James Cornelious SCOTT

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CR7104 Honorable Michael E. Mery , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on March 25, 2022

. We extended this deadline twice to June 16, 2022, and stated in our last order: “No further extensions of time will

be allowed. ” However, to date, the brief has not been filed

. Appellant’s attorney is ORDERED to respond to this court in writing within ten days of the date of this order. The response should state a reasonable explanation for failing to timely file the brief and demonstrate the steps being taken to remedy the deficiency. If appellant’s attorney fails to file an adequate response within ten days, this appeal will be abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing, and the trial court will be asked to consider whether sanctions are appropriate. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of June, 2022

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz
, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 10.24


     

    Exhibit
      10.24


    AMENDMENT
      TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

    


    


    AMENDMENT
      NO. 1
      dated as
      of November 23, 2004 between BERRY
      PLASTICS CORPORATION,
      a
      Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), and
      G. ADAM UNFRIED (the
      "Employee").

     

    


    Reference
      is made to the Employment Agreement dated as of November 22, 1999 (the
      "Employment Agreement"), between the Corporation and the Employee. The
      Corporation and the Employee desire to extend the term of the Employment
      Agreement. All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall
      have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Employment
      Agreement.

     

    Accordingly,
      in consideration of the mutual covenants and premises contained herein and
      other
      good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
      acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

     

    1.  Term.
      Section
      2 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
      follows:

     

    "Subject
      to earlier termination as provided herein, the employment of the Employee
      hereunder shall commence on the Commencement Date, and terminate on December
      31,
      2009 (the "Expiration Date"). Such period of employment is hereinafter referred
      to as the "Employment Period."

     

    2.  Effect
      of Amendment.
      Except
      as expressly amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full
      force
      and effect and unchanged.

     

    3.  Counterparts.
      This
      Amendment No. 1 may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which
      shall
      be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the
      same instrument.

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF,
      the
      parties have hereunto set their hands as of the date first written
      above.

     

    BERRY
      PLASTICS CORPORATION

    


    


    By:   
      /s/ Ira G. Boots

    Ira
      G.
      Boots

    President
      and Chief Executive Officer

    


    


            
      /s/ G. Adam Unfried

    G.
      Adam
      Unfried
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2464 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2464

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 15, 1996

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend Public Law 103-93 to provide additional lands within the State 
  of Utah for the Goshute Indian Reservation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITION OF CERTAIN UTAH STATE LANDS TO GOSHUTE INDIAN 
              RESERVATION.

    The Utah Schools and Lands Improvement Act of 1993 (107 Stat. 995) 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating section 11 as section 12; and
            (2) by inserting after section 10 the following new 
        section:

``SEC. 11. ADDITIONAL GOSHUTE INDIAN RESERVATION LANDS.

    ``(a) Further Additions to Goshute Reservation.--In addition to the 
lands described in section 3, for the purpose of securing in trust for 
the Goshute Indian Tribe certain additional public lands and lands 
belonging to the State of Utah, which comprise approximately 8,000 
acres of surface and subsurface estate, as generally depicted on the 
map entitled `Additional Utah-Goshute Exchange', dated July 1, 1994, 
such public lands and State lands are hereby declared to be part of the 
Goshute Indian Reservation in the State of Utah effective upon the 
completion of conveyance of the State lands from the State of Utah and 
acceptance of title by the United States.
    ``(b) Authorization.--The Secretary of the Interior is authorized 
to acquire through exchange those lands and interests in land described 
in subsection (a) which are owned by the State of Utah, subject to 
valid existing rights.
    ``(c) Application of Prior Provisions.--(1) Except as provided in 
paragraph (2), the remaining provisions of this Act which are 
applicable to the lands to be transferred to the Goshute Indian Tribe 
pursuant to section 3 shall also apply to the lands subject to this 
section.
    ``(2) The Goshute Indian Tribe will be responsible for payment of 
the costs of appraisal of the lands to be acquired pursuant to this 
section, which costs shall be paid prior to the transfer of such 
lands.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 2:10 PM

Received: July 14, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jz6-lu8t

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2259

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Gary Croxall

General Comment

I can manage my retirement without government interference. I can choose my own retirement 

accounts.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 that to the best of his knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Union Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union Bankshares,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


/s/ Kenneth D. Gibbons
----------------------
Kenneth D. Gibbons
Chief Executive Officer


August 14, 2008
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0207 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Alix Sundquist 

Address: 

Arlington, VA, 22207 

Email: masundq@aol.com 

Organization: Self-employed 

General Comment 

The current regulations uder the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health 

Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 do not assure parity for mental health 

coverage. 

I have received favorable reports from trustworthy sources about treatment with 

EEG biofeedback or neurofeedback to help with trauma and other conditions. But 

these services are not covered by most conventional health insurance plans, 

despite significant research showing that neurofeedback may be effective in some 

cases. 

For the above reasons, I believe that neurofeedback should be a covered service. 

There is more research showing that neurofeedback is effective than many medical 

and surgical services that are routinely covered by insurers. That is not parity, and 

should be corrected. 

Sincerely, 

Alix Sundquist 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 27, 2009 

Received: May 27, 2009 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 809b9b4e 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web
Docket: CMS-2009-0040 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: CMS-2009-0040-0048 

Interim Final Rules under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: CMS-2009-0040-DRAFT-0078 

HI 

Submitter Information 

Name: Lark von Tempsky 

Address: 

Paia, HI, 96779 

General Comment 

I am very supportive of most of the provisions of the interim final rules under the Paul Wellstone and Pete 

Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008. These rules address many of the 

inequities in health insurance coverage of mental health care when compared to medical/surgical care that 

I have observed in the course of my mental health practice. 

However, in my opinion, two areas have not been sufficiently clarified. I am quite concerned that unless 

these points are more clearly specified in the final regulations, loopholes will remain that will permit 

widespread violation of the legislative intent of the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health 

Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008: 

1. In my opinion, the interim final rules do not define clearly enough the rules regulating the 

comprehensive scope of services parity between mental health/substance abuse services and 

medical/surgical services. Given the language of the Act and the positions already taken by the 

Departments in the interim final regulations, I request that the Final Rules clarify that benefits for 

MH/SUD must be comparable in scope to the benefits provided in medical/surgical care both across and 

within each classification. Unless parity in scope of services is required in the final regulations, the intent 

of the Act will not be achieved. 

2. I strongly support the application of parity requirements to both QTLs and NQTLs as being consistent 

with the Act and allowing for broad application of the parity requirement with regard to treatment 

limitations. However, in order to implement the intent of the Act, the regulations must specify more clearly 

that any NQTLs that are applied by plans must be comparable for MH/SUD and medical surgical benefits, 

and that any NQTLs for MH/SUD must be no more restrictive than NQTLs that are predominant across 

the broad range of medical/surgical benefits.

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: April 30, 2010 

Received: April 29, 2010 

Status: Draft 

Category: Nurse - HC065 

Tracking No. 80ae3e85 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\baum.beth.EBSADOL\Local Settings\Temporary Internet... 4/30/2010
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 26, 2012 

p0319 

Order 

 

March 26, 2012 

144011 

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 144011 

 COA: 299068 

Genesee CC: 08-088902-CZ 

PARKER’S PROPANE GAS COMPANY, 

 Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

STALEY PLUMBING AND HEATING, INC., 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 27, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the 

completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.
<PAGE>   1
                                                               EXHIBIT 23b (CEI)





                               CONSENT OF COUNSEL
                               ------------------
                                       FOR
                                       ---
                   THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY
                   -------------------------------------------




The statements as to matters of law and legal conclusions under the headings
"General Regulation", "Environmental Regulation" and "Electric Rates" in Item 1.
and "Title to Property" in Item 2. and "Legal Proceedings" in Item 3. of the The
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1996 have been prepared under my supervision and in my
opinion such respective statements as to such matters are correct.

I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the statements
prepared under my supervision as stated in the preceding paragraph and to the
incorporation by reference of those statements into the Prospectus now and
hereafter constituting a part of the Registration Statement previously filed by
The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company under File No. 33-55513 and to the
reference to me under the heading "Experts" in such Prospectus.




                                            TERRENCE G. LINNERT
                                            -----------------------------
                                            Terrence G. Linnert
                                            Senior Vice President,
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            and General Counsel








March 26, 1997
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1354.html[7/23/2015 6:18:06 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvj-luue

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1354

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: RICH MARINO

General Comment

I DO NOT NEED THE GOVERNMENTS HELP TO PLAN MY RETIREMENT!
#### § 382.201 Alcohol concentration.

No driver shall report for duty or remain on duty requiring the performance of safety-sensitive functions while having an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater. No employer having knowledge that a driver has an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater shall permit the driver to perform or continue to perform safety-sensitive functions.

[66 FR 43103, Aug. 17, 2001, as amended at 77 FR 4483, Jan. 30, 2012]
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0647 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Katherine A Keller 

Address: 

PO Box 74106 

Dayton, KY, 41074-0106 

Email: naminky@zoomtown.com 

Phone: 859-261-4080 

Organization: NAMI Northern Kentucky (NAMI NKY) 

General Comment 

“On behalf of NAMI NKY, I am writing to submit comments on the Interim Final Rules under the 

Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 and in 

doing so NAMI NKYendorses the separate comments submitted by the Parity Implementation 

Coalition and the National Alliance on Mental Illness” 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: April 30, 2010 

Received: April 30, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ae497a 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 4/30/2010
§ 382.711 Clearinghouse registration. ( a ) *Clearinghouse registration required.* Each employer and service agent must register with the Clearinghouse before accessing or reporting information in the Clearinghouse.
( b ) *Employers.* ( 1 ) Employer Clearinghouse registration must include: ( i ) Name, address, and telephone number;
( ii ) USDOT number, except if the registrant does not have a USDOT Number, it may be requested to provide other information to verify identity; and
( iii ) Name of the person(s) the employer authorizes to report information to or obtain information from the Clearinghouse and any additional information FMCSA needs to validate his or her identity.
( 2 ) Employers must verify the names of the person(s) authorized under paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section annually.
( 3 ) Identification of the C/TPA or other service agent used to comply with the requirements of this part, if applicable, and authorization for the C/TPA to query or report information to the Clearinghouse. Employers must update any changes to this information within 10 days.
( c ) *MROs and SAPs.* Each MRO or SAP must provide the following to apply for Clearinghouse registration: ( 1 ) Name, address, telephone number, and any additional information FMCSA needs to validate the applicant's identity;
( 2 ) A certification that the applicant's access to the Clearinghouse is conditioned on his or her compliance with the applicable qualification and/or training requirements in 49 CFR part 40; and
( 3 ) Evidence of required professional credentials to verify that the applicant currently meets the applicable qualification and/or training requirements in 49 CFR part 40.
( d ) *C/TPAs and other service agents.* Each consortium/third-party administrator or other service agent must provide the following to apply for Clearinghouse registration: ( 1 ) Name, address, telephone number, and any additional information FMCSA needs to validate the applicant's identity; and
( 2 ) Name, title, and telephone number of the person(s) authorized to report information to and obtain information from the Clearinghouse.
( 3 ) Each C/TPA or other service agent must verify the names of the person(s) authorized under paragraph (d)(2) of this section annually.
[81 FR 87725, Dec. 5, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 80181, Nov. 17, 2023.]
NOBLE MATHEW,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-3887

Opinion filed October 14, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Matthew R. McLain of Brownstone, P.A., Winter Park, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Munn v. Florida Parole Commission, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st 

DCA 2002).

BENTON, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
§ 383.119 Requirements for tank vehicle endorsement. In order to obtain a tank vehicle endorsement, each applicant must have knowledge covering the following: ( a ) Causes, prevention, and effects of cargo surge on motor vehicle handling;
( b ) Proper braking procedures for the motor vehicle when it is empty, full, and partially full;
( c ) Differences in handling of baffled/compartmented tank interiors versus non-baffled motor vehicles;
( d ) Differences in tank vehicle type and construction;
( e ) Differences in cargo surge for liquids of varying product densities;
( f ) Effects of road grade and curvature on motor vehicle handling with filled, half-filled, and empty tanks;
( g ) Proper use of emergency systems;
( h ) For drivers of DOT specification tank vehicles, retest and marking requirements; and
( i ) Operating practices and procedures not otherwise specified.
[76 FR 26890, May 9, 2011]
#### § 220.43 Radio communications consistent with federal regulations and railroad operating rules.

Radio communication shall not be used in connection with a railroad operation in a manner which conflicts with the requirements of this part, Federal Communication Commission regulations, or the railroad's operating rules. The use of citizen band radios for railroad operating purposes is prohibited.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1122.html[7/22/2015 12:01:23 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-uwio

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1122

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I want government to keep its hand off any further regulations on retirement. I want to control all aspects of my

 retirement elections and encourage every American to fund their retirement to any amount they want. The more

 we are able to fund our own retirement plans the less likely we will need to depend on the state and federal

 government for financial assistance. Just how does the government know what is best for vast majority of

 American citizens? Every program they manage is a massive failure