alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 290/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 290 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6412 August 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 290

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6412 August 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Decision No 1/2021 of the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors of 29 June 2021 to amend Decision No 3/2016 of the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors on the Centre for the Development of Enterprise [2021/1330] | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Decision No 1/2021 of the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors of 29 June 2021 to amend Decision No 3/2016 of the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors on the Centre for the Development of Enterprise [2021/1330]

1

| | | III   Other acts |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | * | EFTA Surveillance Authority Delegated Decision of 13 April 2021 recognising the disease-free status of Norway regarding Brucella melitensis in small ruminants [2021/1331] | 3 |
| | * | EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision of 21 April 2021 regarding approval of disease-free and non-vaccination statuses and eradication programmes of Norway and Iceland or certain zones or compartments thereof as regards certain listed diseases in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/689 [2021/1332] | 5 |
| | * | EFTA Surveillance Authority Delegated Decision of 22 April 2021 approving the disease-free status of rabies virus (RABV) of Norway and amending Decision No 032/21/COL [2021/1333] | 11 |

III   Other acts

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

*

EFTA Surveillance Authority Delegated Decision of 13 April 2021 recognising the disease-free status of Norway regarding Brucella melitensis in small ruminants [2021/1331]

Brucella melitensis

3

*

EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision of 21 April 2021 regarding approval of disease-free and non-vaccination statuses and eradication programmes of Norway and Iceland or certain zones or compartments thereof as regards certain listed diseases in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/689 [2021/1332]

5

*

EFTA Surveillance Authority Delegated Decision of 22 April 2021 approving the disease-free status of rabies virus (RABV) of Norway and amending Decision No 032/21/COL [2021/1333]

11

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-13-0617-0619/p130617c.eng.txt[8/2/2013 2:56:28 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0617 , 0618, 0619

Focus Ready Draft 7/15/2013

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ EV

 
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-13-0617-0619/p130617c.eng.txt[8/2/2013 2:56:28 PM]

SAT (concerns) (07/02/2013):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox Related Cases: Analogs -- 

Migration to groundwater: Hyd Pdt negl

PBT rating: P3B1T1 PMN - P1B1; Hyd Pdt - P3B1

Health: 1-2 Inhalation

Eco: 1 No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 0-1

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-13-0617-0619/p130617c.eng.txt[8/2/2013 2:56:28 PM]

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT es

PMN: 13-0617 , 0618, 0619
**Exhibit
      4**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Greg A.
      LeClaire, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.








/s/ Greg A. LeClaire


Greg
      A.
      LeClaire


July
      19,
      2005








*A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
July 21, 2015

Office of Regulations and Interpretations

Employee Benefits Security Administration

Attn: Conflict of Interest Rule

Room N-5655, U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue NW.

Washington, DC 20210

RIN 1210-AB32

To Whom It May Concern:

On behalf of the largest professional association of real estate appraisers in the world, thank you for the 

opportunity to submit the following as a supplemental comment to our previously submitted comments on 

the U.S. Department of Labor (“DoL”) Employee Benefits Security Administration Proposed Rule on the 

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice. 

While the Appraisal Institute is pleased the DoL has proposed a carve-out for providers of real estate 

valuations and fairness opinions for investment funds that hold plan assets of more than one client, we 

believe there is no reason to distinguish between an investment fund with one client and an investment 

fund with two or more clients. Otherwise, there is a risk that an investment fund with only one client, which 

occurs during the life cycle of a typical investment fund, would not have access to information found in 

appraisals and valuations, at a time when the fund may need the information most.

Recommendation

The Appraisal Institute urges the DoL to resolve this concern by expanding the carve-out to include

single-client investment funds, in addition to co-mingled funds. This would ensure access to information 

found in appraisals and valuations remains available. 

Thank you again for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule. We look forward to working with 

the DOL to answer any remaining questions and resolve these concerns. Please contact Bill Garber, 

Director of Government and External Relations at 202-298-5586, bgarber@appraisalinstitute.org or Brian 

Rodgers, Manager of Federal Affairs, at 202-298-5597, brodgers@appraisalinstitute.org. 

Sincerely, 

Appraisal Institute
§ 37.23 Service under contract. ( a ) When a public entity enters into a contractual or other arrangement (including, but not limited to, a grant, subgrant, or cooperative agreement) or relationship with a private entity to operate fixed route or demand responsive service, the public entity shall ensure that the private entity meets the requirements of this part that would apply to the public entity if the public entity itself provided the service.
( b ) A private entity which purchases or leases new, used, or remanufactured vehicles, or remanufactures vehicles, for use, or in contemplation of use, in fixed route or demand responsive service under contract or other arrangement or relationship with a public entity, shall acquire accessible vehicles in all situations in which the public entity itself would be required to do so by this part.
( c ) A public entity which enters into a contractual or other arrangement (including, but not limited to, a grant, subgrant, or cooperative agreement) or relationship with a private entity to provide fixed route service shall ensure that the percentage of accessible vehicles operated by the public entity in its overall fixed route or demand responsive fleet is not diminished as a result.
( d ) A private entity that provides fixed route or demand responsive transportation service under contract or other arrangement (including, but not limited to, a grant, subgrant, or cooperative agreement) with another private entity shall be governed, for purposes of the transportation service involved, by the provisions of this part applicable to the other entity.
[56 FR 45621, Sept. 6, 1991, as amended at 76 FR 57935, Sept. 19, 2011]
§ 37.53 Exception for New York and Philadelphia. ( a ) The following agreements entered into in New York, New York, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, contain lists of key stations for the public entities that are a party to those agreements for those service lines identified in the agreements. The identification of key stations under these agreements is deemed to be in compliance with the requirements of this Subpart. ( 1 ) Settlement Agreement by and among Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Association, Inc., James J. Peters, Terrance Moakley, and Denise Figueroa, individually and as representatives of the class of all persons similarly situated (collectively, “the EPVA class representatives”); and Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (October 4, 1984).
( 2 ) Settlement Agreement by and between Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Association of Pennsylvania, Inc., and James J. Peters, individually; and Dudley R. Sykes, as Commissioner of the Philadelphia Department of Public Property, and his successors in office and the City of Philadelphia (collectively “the City”) and Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (June 28, 1989).
( b ) To comply with §§ 37.47 (b) and (d) or 37.51 (b) and (d) of this part, the entities named in the agreements are required to use their public participation and planning processes only to develop and submit to the FTA Administrator plans for timely completion of key station accessibilty, as provided in this subpart.
( c ) In making accessible the key stations identified under the agreements cited in this section, the entities named in the agreements are subject to the requirements of § 37.9 of this part.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ROGELIO MENDEZ, JR., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4052

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed March 7, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Polk County; William D. Sites,

Judge.

Rogelio Mendez, Jr., pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ey v. State, 982 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 2008); Mendez v. State, 

229 So. 3d 335 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (table decision); Mendez v. State, 190 So. 3d 71 

(Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (table decision); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 

2013); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Chandler v. State, 1 So. 3d 

284 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Waiter v. State, 965 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Bizzell v. 

State, 912 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Gusow v. State, 6 So. 3d 699 (Fla. 4th DCA 

2009).

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 89]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ089.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 2063]]

Public Law 109-89
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To redesignate the Crowne Plaza in Kingston, Jamaica as the Colin L. 
     Powell Residential Plaza. <<NOTE: Oct. 13, 2005 -  [S. 1413]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF COLIN L. POWELL RESIDENTIAL PLAZA.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building in Kingston, Jamaica, 
formerly known as the Crowne Plaza and now a staff housing facility for 
the United States mission in Jamaica, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Colin L. Powell Residential Plaza''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
Colin L. Powell Residential Plaza.

    Approved October 13, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1413:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            July 15, considered and passed Senate.
            Oct. 6, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 32.660 Recipient.

*Recipient* means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, unit of government (except a Federal agency) or legal entity, however organized, that receives an award directly from a Federal agency.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 2746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00628]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8594]

Determination by the Secretary of State Relating to Iran 
Sanctions

AGENCY: Department of State

    This notice is to inform the public that the Secretary of State 
determined, on November 29, 2013, pursuant to Section 1245(d)(4)(D) of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (NDAA) 
(Pub. L. 112-81), as amended by the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria 
Human Rights Act (Pub. L. 112-158), that as of November 29, 2013, each 
of the following importers of oil from Iran has qualified for the 180-
day exception outlined in section 1245(d)(4)(D): India, Malaysia, the 
People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, South 
Africa, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, and Turkey. The Secretary of State last made 
exception determinations under Section 1245(d)(4)(D) of the NDAA 
regarding these importers on June 5, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carlos Pascual, Special Envoy and 
Coordinator, Bureau of Energy Resources, (202) 647-8543.

Carlos Pascual,
Bureau of Energy Resources, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-00628 Filed 1-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-02-P
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 7, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Todd B.
Barnum, the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Todd B. Barnum
--------------------------------------
Todd B. Barnum, Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer

September 14, 2005

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.


                                                                              25
Order entered May 18 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 15
- 00388
- CV ERNEST K. BANKAS, Appellant
V. MAUREEN BANKAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 09
- 13471 

### O RDER The record in this case is past due. On April 23, 2015, the trial court sustained the contest to appellant’s affidavit of indigence. On May 14, 2015, Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk, notified the Court that the clerk’ s record has been prepared and is being held for

non - payment of $181.00. In a letter dated May 14, 2015, this Court instructed appellant to file, within ten days, written verification that appellant has paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee. W e modify the due date for appellant’s response to JUNE 8, 2015 . We ca ution appellant that failure to provide written verification of payment or payment arrangements for the clerk’s fee by JUNE 8, 2015 will result in dismissal of the appeal for want of pro secution. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b).We ORDER Shantel Beheler, Official Court Reporter for the 301st Judicial District Court, to file, by JUNE 8, 2015 , either (1) the reporter’s record, (2) written verification that appellant has not requested the repor ter’s record, or (3) written verification that appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. We caution appellant that if we receive written verification of no request or no payment or payment arrangements, we will order th e appeal submitted without a reporter’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c).
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by electronic transmission to Felicia Pitre, Shantel Beheler, and counsel for appellee and, by first

- class mail to appellant.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2481 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2481

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the Federal Triangle Project under construction at 14th 
Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest, in the District of Columbia, 
   as the ``Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2481

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the Federal Triangle Project under construction at 14th 
Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest, in the District of Columbia, 
   as the ``Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal Triangle Project under construction at 14th Street and 
Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest, in the District of Columbia, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Ronald Reagan Building and International 
Trade Center''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ronald Reagan Building and 
International Trade Center''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 18 
      (legislative day, December 15), 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Tri-Valley Corporation. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   | November 17, 2011                                                           |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:               | /s/ Gregory L. Billinger                                                    |
|              | Gregory L. Billinger, Interim Chief Financial OfficerTri-Valley Corporation |
----

----

| CLECO              CORPORATION |  EXHIBIT                32.1 |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------|

|  Cleco                Corporation                                      |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| CERTIFICATION                PURSUANT TO                                    |
| 18                U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                      |
| AS                ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                       |
| SECTION                906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF                2002 |

| (1)                The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)                The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

| Date: August                9, 2007                                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/  Michael                H. Madison                                                                        |
| Michael                H. Madison                   President and Chief Executive                Officer |

----

----
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC

September 20, 2015

Regulatory Docket No. _______________

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF:

ARGISHTI ZAMANYAN

FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF 

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 45.23(b), 

61.101(e)(4), & (5), 61.113(a) & (b), 61.133 (a), 61.23(a) & (c), 91.7(a), 

91.9(b)(2), 91.109(a), 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.203(a) & (b), 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL 

OPERATION OF DJI PHANTOM 3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM 

ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112-95)

Argishti Zamanyan

1436 Glenoaks Blvd #129

Glendale, CA 91201