alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 126

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Sugar Ray Robinson should be recognized for his athletic achievements and commitment

to young people.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 26, 2001

Mr. RANGEL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

Sugar Ray Robinson should be recognized for his athletic

achievements and commitment to young people.

Whereas Sugar Ray Robinson was born in Detroit, Michigan,

on May 3, 1920;

Whereas in 1932 he moved to New York City where he started boxing as an amateur, going undefeated in 89 bouts,

and winning the Golden Gloves featherweight title in

1939;

Whereas in 1940 he began boxing professionally and fought

at New York City’s Madison Square Garden for the first

time;
2

•HRES 126 IH

Whereas in 1946 he won his first world title as a

welterweight, and then held the middleweight title for 5

years between 1951 and 1960;

Whereas after retiring for a time he returned to box a series

of exciting matches before permanently retiring on December 10, 1965;

Whereas in a career spanning 25 years, he won 175 of 202

bouts with 109 knockouts;

Whereas his grace, speed, power, and mastery of the ring

earned him international acclaim as one of the greatest

fighters in boxing history;

Whereas Sugar Ray Robinson was elected into the Boxing

Hall of Fame in 1967;

Whereas in 1969 he established the Sugar Ray Robinson

Youth Foundation; and

Whereas Sugar Ray Robinson died in Culver City, California,

on April 12, 1989, at the age of 68: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that Sugar Ray Robinson should be recog3 nized as one of history’s greatest professional boxers,

4 whose dedication to boxing and commitment to young peo5 ple have earned him a permanent place in sports history.

Æ
#### Fannie E. Willson, Appellant, *v.*Faxon, Williams and Faxon, Respondent.

Reported below, 138 App. Div. 359.

(Submitted April 24, 1911;

decided May 2, 1911.)

Motion for leave to withdraw an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in *543the fourth judicial department, entered May 4, 1910, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and granting a new trial in an action to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff through the defendant negligently selling her cathartic tablets containing calomel instead of cascara.

The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal had been inadvertently taken.

*Charles Newton*for motion.

*Carlton E. Ladd*opposed.

Motion granted on payment of costs and ten dollars costs of motion within twenty days; on failure to make such payment the motion is denied, with ten dollars costs.
Editorial Note on Part 387
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 387 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 387.11 State authority and designation of agent. A policy of insurance or surety bond does not satisfy the financial responsibility requirements of this subpart unless the insurer or surety furnishing the policy or bond is— ( a ) Legally authorized to issue such policies or bonds in each State in which the motor carrier operates; or
( b ) Legally authorized to issue such policies or bonds in the State in which the motor carrier has its principal place of business or domicile, and is willing to designate a person upon whom process, issued by or under the authority of any court having jurisdiction of the subject matter, may be served in any proceeding at law or equity brought in any State in which the motor carrier operates; or
( c ) Legally authorized to issue such policies or bonds in any State of the United States and eligible as an excess or surplus lines insurer in any State in which business is written, and is willing to designate a person upon whom process, issued by or under the authority of any court having jurisdiction of the subject matter, may be served in any proceeding at law or equity brought in any State in which the motor carrier operates.
( d ) A Canadian insurance company legally authorized to issue a policy of insurance in the Province or Territory of Canada in which the Canadian motor carrier has its principal place of business or domicile, and that is willing to designate a person upon whom process, issued by or under the authority of any court having jurisdiction over the subject matter, may be served in any proceeding at law or equity brought in any State in which the motor carrier operates.
[46 FR 30982, June 11, 1981, as amended at 48 FR 52683, Nov. 21, 1983; 75 FR 38430, July 2, 2010]
-----Original Message----- 

From: barrows@sonic.net [mailto:barrows@sonic.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:54 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Robert Barrows 

6643 Greenmeadow Dr 

Santa Rosa, CA 95409
Editorial Note on Part 384
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 384 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 384.204 CLP or CDL issuance and information. ( a ) *General rule.* The State shall authorize a person to operate a CMV only by issuance of a CLP or CDL, unless an exception in § 383.3(c) or (d) applies, which contains, at a minimum, the information specified in part 383, subpart J, of this subchapter.
( b ) *Exceptions* — ( 1 ) *Training.* The State may authorize a person who does not hold a CDL valid for the type of vehicle in which training occurs to undergo behind-the-wheel training in a CMV only by means of a CLP issued and used in accordance with § 383.25 of this subchapter.
( 2 ) *Confiscation of CLP or CDL pending enforcement.* A State may allow a CLP or CDL holder whose CLP or CDL is held in trust by that State or any other State in the course of enforcement of the motor vehicle traffic code, but who has not been convicted of a disqualifying offense under § 383.51 of this subchapter based on such enforcement, to drive a CMV while holding a dated receipt for such CLP or CDL.
[76 FR 26894, May 9, 2011]
§ 29.805 When can the Department immediately terminate a compact or funding agreement (or portion thereof)? ( a ) The Department may immediately terminate a compact or funding agreement (or a portion thereof) if: ( 1 ) The Department makes a finding of imminent substantial and irreparable jeopardy to a trust asset, natural resource, or public health and safety; and
( 2 ) The jeopardy arises out of a failure to carry out the compact or funding agreement.
( b ) The Department must provide notice of immediate termination by any method that provides receipt. The notice must set forth the findings that support the Department's determination, advise the Tribe whether it will be reimbursed for any closeout costs incurred after the termination, request the return of any property, and advise the Tribe of its right to a hearing pursuant to § 29.925. Concurrently, the Department must notify the Office of Hearings that the Department intends to immediately terminate a compact or funding agreement. Pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 207(f)(2)(E) and § 29.928, the Department has the burden of proof in any hearing or appeal of an immediate termination.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 923 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 923

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from net earnings 
 from self-employment certain payments under the conservation reserve 
                                program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2001

 Mr. Moran of Kansas (for himself, Mr. Pomeroy, Mr. Riley, Mr. Thune, 
Mr. Ganske, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Moore, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Kind, Mr. Istook, 
Mr. Thornberry, Mr. Bereuter, Mr. Johnson of Illinois, Mr. Hostettler, 
 Mr. Combest, Mr. McHugh, Mr. Sessions, and Mr. Kennedy of Minnesota) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from net earnings 
 from self-employment certain payments under the conservation reserve 
                                program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PAYMENTS UNDER CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM EXCLUDED 
              FROM NET EARNINGS FROM SELF-EMPLOYMENT.

    (a) Internal Revenue Code.--Section 1402(a) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 (relating to net earnings from self-employment) is amended 
by striking ``; and'' at the end of paragraph (14), striking the period 
and inserting ``; and'' at the end of paragraph (15), and inserting 
after paragraph (15) the following new paragraph:
            ``(16) there shall be excluded amounts received as annual 
        rental payments under section 1234 of the Food Security Act of 
        1985 (16 U.S.C. 3834) for lands enrolled in the conservation 
        reserve.''.
    (b) Social Security Act.--Section 211(a) of the Social Security Act 
is amended by striking ``; and'' at the end of paragraph (14), striking 
the period and inserting ``; and'' at the end of paragraph (15), and 
inserting after paragraph (15) the following new paragraph:
            ``(16) There shall be excluded amounts received as annual 
        rental payments under section 1234 of the Food Security Act of 
        1985 (16 U.S.C. 3834) for lands enrolled in the conservation 
        reserve.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 365

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 365 appear at 66 FR 49870, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 365.509 Requirement to notify FMCSA of change in applicant information.

(a) A motor carrier subject to this subpart must notify FMCSA of any changes or corrections to the information in parts I, IA, or II of Form OP-1(MX), or in Form BOC-3—Designation of Agents—Motor Carriers, Brokers and Freight Forwarders, during the application process or after having been granted provisional operating authority. The carrier must notify FMCSA in writing within 30 days of the change or correction.

(b) If a carrier fails to comply with paragraph (a) of this section, the FMCSA may suspend or revoke its operating authority until it meets those requirements.

[67 FR 12714, Mar. 19, 2002, as amended at 80 FR 63705, Oct. 21, 2015]

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 82 FR 5302, Jan. 17, 2017, § 365.509 was suspended, effective Jan. 14, 2017.
#### § 29.513 How long must a Tribe keep and make available records?

A Tribe must keep books, documents, papers, and records of funding, grants, and State-provided funds for 3 years from the date of submission of the Single Audit Act audit report and provide the Department or the Comptroller General access to such records for audit and examination related to compacts, funding agreements, grants, contracts, subcontracts, sub-grants, or other arrangements under the Program.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHigh-temperature test facility at the NASA Lewis engine components research laboratoryThe high temperature test facility (HTTF) at NASA-Lewis Engine Components Research Laboratory (ECRL) is presently used to evaluate the survivability of aerospace materials and the effectiveness of new sensing instrumentation in a realistic afterburner environment. The HTTF has also been used for advanced heat transfer studies on aerospace components. The research rig uses pressurized air which is heated with two combustors to simulate high temperature flow conditions for test specimens. Maximum airflow is 31 pps. The HTTF is pressure rated for up to 150 psig. Combustors are used to regulate test specimen temperatures up to 2500 F. Generic test sections are available to house test plates and advanced instrumentation. Customized test sections can be fabricated for programs requiring specialized features and functions. The high temperature test facility provides government and industry with a facility for testing aerospace components. Its operation and capabilities are described.Document ID19900015835Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsColantonio, Renato O.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1990Subject CategoryResearch And Support Facilities (Air)Report/Patent NumberE-5495NASA-TM-103143NAS 1.15:103143Accession Number90N25151Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-3BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900015835.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 138 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          May 10, 2001.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1646) to authorize appropriations for the Department of State for 
fiscal years 2002 and 2003, and for other purposes. The first reading of the 
bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 
bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on International Relations. After general 
debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It 
shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment 
under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on International Relations now printed in the bill. 
The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute are waived. No amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of 
a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the 
Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Except as specified in section 
2 of this resolution, each such amendment may be offered only in the order 
printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, 
shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 
report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall 
not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division 
of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of 
order against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of 
the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House 
with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate 
vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the 
bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
    Sec. 2. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may recognize for 
consideration of any amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
out of the order printed, but not sooner than one hour after the Majority Leader 
or his designee announces from the floor a request to that effect.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7095** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JULIEN K. DILKS, a/k/a Julien K. Modica, a/k/a Julian Modica , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Glen E. Conrad , Chief District Judge. ( 7:93

- cr - 00091

- GEC

- RSB

- 1; 7:16

- cv - 81163

- GEC

- RSB )

Submitted : November 17 , 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Julien K. Modica , Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublishe d opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Julien K. Dilks appeals the district court ’ s order construing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as a petition for a writ of

error coram nobis and dismissing the petition based upon a previ ously issued prefiling injunction
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dilks , Nos. 7:93

- cr - 00091

- GEC

- RSB

- 1; 7:16

- cv - 81163

- GEC

- RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 1, 2016)
. We also deny Dilks’ motions to make a district cour t transcript available to this c ourt, to unseal a psychiatric report, to amend/correct his informal brief, and to accelerate case processing
. We dis pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISS ED
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1110.html[7/22/2015 11:12:45 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-2qoz

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1110

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Scott Smith

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement. We have seen how Obama had screwed everything else, leave our retirement

 alone
§ 26.3 To whom does this part apply? ( a ) If you are a recipient of any of the following types of funds, this part applies to you: ( 1 ) Federal-aid highway funds authorized under Titles I (other than Part B) and V of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA), Public Law 102-240, 105 Stat. 1914, or Titles I, III, and V of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21), Public Law 105-178, 112 Stat. 107. Titles I, III, and V of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), Public Law 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144; Divisions A and B of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405; Titles I, II, III, and VI of the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) Public Law 114-94;, and Divisions A and C of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), enacted as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), Public Law 117-58.
( 2 ) Federal transit funds authorized by Titles I, III, V and VI of ISTEA, Public Law 102-240 or by Federal transit laws in Title 49, U.S. Code, or Titles I, III, and V of the TEA-21, Public Law 105-178. Titles I, III, and V of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), Public Law 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144; Divisions A and B of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), Public Law 112-141, 126 Stat. 405; Titles I, II, III, and VI of the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) Public Law 114-94; and Divisions A and C of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), enacted as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) (Pub. L. 117-58), Public Law 117-58.
( 3 ) Airport funds authorized by 49 U.S.C. 47101, *et seq.*
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) If you are letting a contract, and that contract is to be performed entirely outside the United States, its territories and possessions, Puerto Rico, Guam, or the Northern Mariana Islands, this part does not apply to the contract.
( d ) If you are letting a contract in which DOT financial assistance does not participate, this part does not apply to the contract.
[89 FR 24963, Apr. 9, 2024]