alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00419-CV

DEALERON, INC.,

Appellant

v.

KRIS BROWN CHEVROLET, BUICK, GMC, LLC,

Appellee

From the 413th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-C201600336

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Dealeron, Inc. appealed the trial court’s Order Denying Defendant’s Motion to 

Compel Arbitration. Dealeron, Inc. has now filed an unopposed motion to dismiss its 

appeal. 

Accordingly, the motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). 

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
DealerOn, Inc. v. Kris Brown Chevrolet, Buick, GMC, LLC Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed January 11, 2017

[CV06]
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 826

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a shorter recovery

period for the depreciation of certain restaurant buildings.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 2001

Mr. FOLEY (for himself, Mr. WATKINS, Mr. WAMP, Mr. PICKERING, Ms.

DUNN, Mr. SHOWS, and Mr. STUMP) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

a shorter recovery period for the depreciation of certain

restaurant buildings.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RECOVERY PERIOD FOR DEPRECIATION OF

4 RESTAURANT BUILDINGS.

5 (a) 15-YEAR RECOVERY PERIOD.—Subparagraph

6 (E) of section 168(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of

7 1986 (relating to 15-year property) is amended by striking

8 ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause (ii), by striking the period at
2

•HR 826 IH

1 the end of clause (iii) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and by adding

2 at the end the following new clause:

3 ‘‘(iv) any section 1250 property which

4 is a retail restaurant facility.’’

5 (b) RETAIL RESTAURANT FACILITY.—Subsection (e)

6 of section 168 of such Code is amended by adding at the

7 end the following new paragraph:

8 ‘‘(6) RETAIL RESTAURANT FACILITY.—The

9 term ‘retail restaurant facility’ means any building

10 if more than 50 percent of the building’s square

11 footage is devoted to preparation of, and seating for

12 on-premises consumption of, prepared meals.’’

13 (c) ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM.—The table contained in

14 section 168(g)(3)(B) of such Code is amended by inserting

15 after the item relating to subparagraph (E)(iii) the fol16 lowing new item:

‘‘(E)(iv) ..................................................................................................... 20’’.

17 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

18 this section shall apply to retail restaurant buildings

19 placed in service after the date of the enactment of this

20 Act and to all improvements made after the date of enact21 ment.

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 70703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29346]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the California Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that the California Advisory 
Committee (Committee) to the Commission will meet on Monday, December 
5, 2011. The first meeting of the Committee will begin at 1 p.m. and 
adjourn about 2 p.m.; the purpose of the first meeting is member 
orientation and discussion of administrative matters. The second 
meeting will begin at approximately 2 p.m. and adjourn at about 4 p.m.; 
the purpose of the second meeting is a discussion of the Committee's 
report on free speech on California public college and university 
campuses. The meetings will be held at the Mexican American Legal 
Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF), 634 South Spring Street, 11th 
Floor, Los Angeles CA 90014.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the Western Regional Office of the 
Commission by January 5, 2012. The address is Western Regional Office, 
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 300 N. Los Angeles Street, Suite 2010, 
Los Angeles, CA 90012. Persons wishing to email their comments, or to 
present their comments verbally at the meeting, or who desire 
additional information should contact Angelica Trevino, Office Manager, 
Western Regional Office, at (213) 894-3437, (or for hearing impaired 
TDD (913) 551-1414), or by email to atrevino@usccr.gov. Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Western Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Western Regional Office at the above 
email or street address. The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the 
provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, November 8, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-29346 Filed 11-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         96,478
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,027,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                   30,000
<INVENTORY>                                    4,717,082
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,045,665
<PP&E>                                         14,033,111
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6,308,965
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 28,550,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          914,019
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    400
<COMMON>                                       53,620
<OTHER-SE>                                     14,240,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   28,550,102
<SALES>                                        7,014,455
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,014,455
<CGS>                                          5,789,081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,789,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,090,081
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             308,094
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (53,511)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (53,511)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (53,511)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.03)
        


</TABLE>
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0687 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Mary Lee Esty 

Address: 

4608 Drummond Ave 

Chevy Chase, MD, 20815 

Email: maryleeesty@aol.com 

Phone: 301-656-7274 

Organization: International Society for Neruofeedback and Research 

General Comment 

I have been treating people with mental health and addiction problems since 1994 with results 

that are so positive that starting in 2001 my research has been published in leading journals. 

These include the Journal of Pain, Clinical Neuropsychiatry, Brain Injury, and The Journal of Head 

Trauma Rehabilitation. Current research using Neurofeedback for PTSD with our Soldiers serving 

in Iraq and Afghanistan has led to invitations from Walter Reed Army Medical Center, and the 

Force Health Prevention Conference to present the current data. The time is long past due for 

Neurofeedback to be recognized as one of the effective treatments for mental health problems. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: May 03, 2010 

Received: May 03, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ae5950 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 5/3/2010
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–302 

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 3010, DEPARTMENTS OF LABOR, HEALTH AND HUMAN 

SERVICES, AND EDUCATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2006 

NOVEMBER 17 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 16), 2005.—Referred to the House 

Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mrs. CAPITO, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 559] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 559, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report to accompany H.R. 3010, Departments of Labor, Health and 

Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006, and against its consideration. The resolution also 

provides that the conference report shall be considered as read. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order is necessary because the conference report was filed with the House on the legislative day of 

Wednesday, November 16, 2005 and it may be considered by the 

House as early as the legislative day of Thursday, November 17, 

2005, which would violate clause 8 of rule XXII (requiring a threeday layover of conference reports and the accompanying joint explanatory statement). 

Æ
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsModeling, simulation, and analysis of optical remote sensing systemsRemote Sensing of the Earth's resources from space-based sensors has evolved in the past 20 years from a scientific experiment to a commonly used technological tool. The scientific applications and engineering aspects of remote sensing systems have been studied extensively. However, most of these studies have been aimed at understanding individual aspects of the remote sensing process while relatively few have studied their interrelations. A motivation for studying these interrelationships has arisen with the advent of highly sophisticated configurable sensors as part of the Earth Observing System (EOS) proposed by NASA for the 1990's. Two approaches to investigating remote sensing systems are developed. In one approach, detailed models of the scene, the sensor, and the processing aspects of the system are implemented in a discrete simulation. This approach is useful in creating simulated images with desired characteristics for use in sensor or processing algorithm development. A less complete, but computationally simpler method based on a parametric model of the system is also developed. In this analytical model the various informational classes are parameterized by their spectral mean vector and covariance matrix. These class statistics are modified by models for the atmosphere, the sensor, and processing algorithms and an estimate made of the resulting classification accuracy among the informational classes. Application of these models is made to the study of the proposed High Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (HRIS). The interrelationships among observational conditions, sensor effects, and processing choices are investigated with several interesting results.Document ID19900017060Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsKerekes, John Paul*(Purdue Univ. West Lafayette, IN, United States)*Landgrebe, David A.*(Purdue Univ. West Lafayette, IN, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1989Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberTR-EE-89-49NASA-CR-186648NAS 1.26:186648Accession Number90N26376Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAGW-925CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF ECS-85-07405Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017060.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 373.201 Receipts and bills of lading for freight forwarders.

Each freight forwarder must issue the shipper a receipt or through bill of lading, covering transportation from origin to ultimate destination, on each shipment for which it arranges transportation in interstate commerce. Where a motor carrier receives freight at the origin and issues a receipt therefor on its form with a notation showing the freight forwarder's name, then the freight forwarder, upon receiving the shipment at the “on line” or consolidating station, must issue a receipt or through bill of lading on its form as of the date the carrier receives the shipment.

[74 FR 15393, Apr. 6, 2009]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1003.html[7/22/2015 6:27:36 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-fgd7

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1003

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Valerie Messman

General Comment

its my money not yours!
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0914.html[7/21/2015 6:12:12 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-oclc

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0914

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Please let us control our own retirement! Thank You!
PETITION TO: SECRETARY THOMAS E. PEREZ, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Millions of Americans like me are counting on ottr 401(k) plans and individual retirement accounts for a secure
financial future — and we've worked hard to build and grow our savings. These plans often involve complex
financial decisions, so many of us have to use investment professionals for guidance. Loopholes'in the current
Jaw make it easy for some on Wall Street to take advantage of hardworking Americans and line their own
pockets with our retirement savings. Last year alone, hidden fees, unfair risk, and bad investment advice

icans' retirement savii by as us $17 billion. It’s time to close this loophole and ensure a
high standard that holds anyone who gives financial advice genuinely accountable for helping us choose the best
investments. As one of your constituents, I'm counting on you to work to close the loophole:now.

es Comer
PLOLSSXXXS SO7BBLS508 Sanford, NC 27330-6929
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the March
31, 1998 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000705671
<NAME> OMEGA FINANCIAL CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          34,640
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             799
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                21,950
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    129,341
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         130,735
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           131,276
<LOANS>                                        690,656
<ALLOWANCE>                                     11,978
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,026,911
<DEPOSITS>                                     837,676
<SHORT-TERM>                                    19,952
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             22,521
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,936
<COMMON>                                       144,826
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,026,911
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,928
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,410
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   357
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,695
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,964
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,184
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,511
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      242
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 289
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,894
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,110
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,110
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.85
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,227
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,578
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    45
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  7,850
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                11,793
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      232
<RECOVERIES>                                       175
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               11,978
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            11,978
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE 
SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 
DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>.............................................................<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>...................................................3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>...............................................DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>..................................................JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>....................................................MAR-31-1996
<CASH>..........................................................1,904,590
<SECURITIES>....................................................1,069,975
<RECEIVABLES>...................................................2,683,962
<ALLOWANCES>....................................................(83,195)
<INVENTORY>.....................................................5,928,591
<CURRENT-ASSETS>................................................13,581,499
<PP&E>..........................................................20,598,856
<DEPRECIATION>..................................................(7,299,988)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>..................................................27,683,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>...........................................4,153,126
<BONDS>.........................................................0
<COMMON>........................................................0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>...........................................0
<PREFERRED>.....................................................86,085
<OTHER-SE>......................................................22,914,495
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>....................................27,683,718
<SALES>.........................................................5,173,394
<TOTAL-REVENUES>................................................5,173,394
<CGS>...........................................................2,465,794
<TOTAL-COSTS>...................................................1,615,076
<OTHER-EXPENSES>................................................(528,401)
<LOSS-PROVISION>................................................0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>..............................................0
<INCOME-PRETAX>.................................................1,620,925
<INCOME-TAX>....................................................580,940
<INCOME-CONTINUING>.............................................1,039,985
<DISCONTINUED>..................................................0
<EXTRAORDINARY>.................................................0
<CHANGES>.......................................................0
<NET-INCOME>....................................................1,039,985
<EPS-PRIMARY>...................................................0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>...................................................0.12
        

</TABLE>
§ 29.904 What are pre-award decisions that a Tribe may appeal? A Tribe may appeal pre-award decisions, which include: ( a ) A decision whether to include a Department program in a funding agreement;
( b ) A decision whether an activity is an inherent Federal function;
( c ) A decision on a final offer before the Department and the Tribe enter into a compact or funding agreement;
( d ) A decision on a final offer before the Department and the Tribe execute an amendment modifying the terms of an existing compact or funding agreement; and
( e ) An eligibility determination.