alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Company's Quarterly Report on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q/A for                the                period ended September 27, 2008, as filed with the Securities and                Exchange                Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies                with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange                Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0839.html[7/21/2015 3:40:11 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-1yjc

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0839

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Laurie Lamb

General Comment

The government needs to keep their hands OFF our 401K's and IRA's!
From: gerry@manningintl.com [mailto:gerry@manningintl.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:43 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Gerry Manning 

140 Sherman Street, Fifth fl 

Fairfield, CT 06824
-----Original Message----- 

From: monzanet@yahoo.com [mailto:monzanet@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:32 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Deborah Friend 

3 Crystal Lane 

Newton, NH 03858
#### § 366.6T Cancellation or change.

A designation may be canceled or changed only by a new designation except that, where a carrier or broker ceases to be subject to § 366.4T in whole or in part for 1 year, designation is no longer required and may be canceled without making another designation.

[82 FR 5303, Jan. 17, 2017]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 21, 1995 (84), Para 84.20 Motion to Adjourn]
[Page 1029]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.84.20  motion to adjourn

  Mr. ARMEY moved that the House do now adjourn.
  The question being put,
  Will the House now adjourn?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaHOOD, announced that the yeas had it.
  Mr. VOLKMER demanded a recorded vote on agreeing to said motion, which 
demand was supported by one-fifth of a quorum, so a recorded vote was 
ordered.
  The vote was taken by electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

224

affirmative

Nays

190
```
Opinion issued February 12, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 1 8 - 0 1 0 28 - CV

——————————— IN RE TE XAS CONST R UCTION S PECIAL ISTS, L.L.C. , Relator

O rigi n al Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, T exas Construction Specialists, L.L.C. , has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging “[t]he trial court’s refus[al] to hear or rule upon Relator’s motions for continuance ” of a November 26, 2018 trial setting. 1 With its petition,

1 The underlying case i s T exas Construction Specialists, L.L.C. v. Supreme Dump Trucks and Trailers of Houston, L.L.C. , cause n umber 1 6

- CV

- 1 2 59 , in the 40 5 th District Court of Galveston County, Texas. The petition names the Honorable Michelle Slaughter as respondent in this original proceeding. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52 .2

. Judge Slaughter has ceased to be the presiding judge of the 405th District2

relator moved for a stay of the trial court proceedings. On November 19, 2018, we granted relato r’s motion and stayed the underlying trial court proceedings

. On January 15, 2019, we vacated that order. Also, on January 15, 2019, the Clerk of this Court notified the parties that, because the trial setting had effectively been continued and th e proceeding appeared moot, the Court m ay dismiss the petition unless the parties filed a response demonstrating that the Court ha s jurisdiction over the proceeding. Cf. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42 .3

. No party has responded

. Further, w e conclude that any challeng e to the trial court’s refusal to consider relator’s motions for a continuance of the November 2 6 , 2018 trial setting has become moot. See In re Kellogg Brown & Root , Inc. , 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) (“A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings

. . . .”); In re S. Nurseries, Inc. , No. 13

- 09

- 00661

- CV, 2009 WL 48931 9 5, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi

– Edinburg Dec. 17, 2009, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.)

. (dismissin g as moot mandamus petition challenging trial court’s refusal to abate trial after trial court granted continuance)

.

Court. B ecause relator’s petition has become moot , in the interest of judicial economy and for good cause, we suspend the application of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2(b) to the extent abatement of this case may be mandatory. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 2, 7.2(b).3

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Countiss

.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0767.html[7/21/2015 12:12:14 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-q53m

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0767

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: DO Anonymous

Address:

Apopka, FL,

General Comment

DO NOT REGULATE RETIREMENT FUNDS. 

THESE FUNDS HAVE BEEN PUT ASIDE BY ASTUTE INVESTORS FOR THEIR RETIREMENT

AND PEOPLE WHO ARE CAPABLE OF ASSUMING SUCH RESPONSIBILITY DO NOT NEED 

YOUR RESTRICTIONS PLACED ON THEM TO SPEND THEIR MONEY ON THEIR RETIREMENT

 OBLIGATIONS. STAY OUT OF OTHER PEOPLE'S BUSINESS.
§ 299.703 Compliance. After the railroad's inspection, testing, and maintenance program is approved by FRA pursuant to the requirements and procedures set forth in § 299.713, the railroad shall adopt and comply with the program, and shall perform— ( a ) All inspections and tests described in the program in accordance with the procedures and criteria that the railroad identified as safety-critical; and
( b ) All maintenance tasks and procedures described in the program in accordance with the procedures and intervals that the railroad identified as safety-critical.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-11935

 

 

CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX,LP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
Opinion issued August 30, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-17-00240-CV

———————————

NEW OMEGA INVESTMENT PROPERTY, LLC, Appellant

V.

MIKE NEMATPOUR, AKA MOHAMMAD NEMATPOUR AND CO/MAX 

REALTY, INC. AKA CO/MAX HOLDING & REALTY CO., Appellees

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2013-64388

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant New Omega Investment Property, LLC has filed a motion for 

voluntary dismissal of its appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). No opinion has 

issued. Appellees have not opposed the motion. 
2

We grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Massengale.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1146.html[7/22/2015 2:41:35 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-mjde

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1146

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Patrick Lawson

Address:

614 Capital Blvd #115

Raleigh, 27603

Email: Lblues111@aol.com

Phone: 9198299231

General Comment

Leave me alone!!
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 

Received: July 21, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k3p-qrkk

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2570

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Bryan Strong

General Comment

As a financial advisor, one of the most critical needs I address with clients is saving for a secure 

retirement. I work closely with investors to understand their needs, define their financial goals 

and create a tailored plan to help them achieve a secure and comfortable retirement. I am very 

concerned that the Department of Labor's proposed fiduciary rulemaking could limit my ability 

to provide these clients with meaningful education and assistance. 

Edward Jones serves nearly 7 million individual investors. Our clients range from young families 

just starting to prepare for retirement to retirees who have successfully saved for a secure 

retirement. We've found when they work with us, investors are more likely to take a disciplined, 

long-term approach to achieving this important financial goal. 

I strive to serve the best interests of clients every day and fully support a best interest standard. I 

am concerned that under this proposal all investors, including lower and middle income investors 

and small businesses, would lose access to affordable guidance and assistance.

The DOL's proposal is well-intentioned, but after four years of ongoing discussions to craft an 

appropriate standard, I'm concerned the DOL has proposed a rule that still doesn't work. By 

limiting or eliminating the ability of investors to work with financial advisors in ways they find 
meaningful and valuable, it will almost certainly result in less retirement savings at a time when 

savings rates are already low. 

I respectfully ask you to support bipartisan legislation promoting a workable best interest 

standard. We owe it to the millions of investors who have entrusted us with their retirement 

savings to ensure we get a standard of care that truly serves their best interests.

Bryan D. Strong
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCeramics Analysis and Reliability Evaluation of Structures (CARES). Users and programmers manualThis manual describes how to use the Ceramics Analysis and Reliability Evaluation of Structures (CARES) computer program. The primary function of the code is to calculate the fast fracture reliability or failure probability of macroscopically isotropic ceramic components. These components may be subjected to complex thermomechanical loadings, such as those found in heat engine applications. The program uses results from MSC/NASTRAN or ANSYS finite element analysis programs to evaluate component reliability due to inherent surface and/or volume type flaws. CARES utilizes the Batdorf model and the two-parameter Weibull cumulative distribution function to describe the effect of multiaxial stress states on material strength. The principle of independent action (PIA) and the Weibull normal stress averaging models are also included. Weibull material strength parameters, the Batdorf crack density coefficient, and other related statistical quantities are estimated from four-point bend bar or unifrom uniaxial tensile specimen fracture strength data. Parameter estimation can be performed for single or multiple failure modes by using the least-square analysis or the maximum likelihood method. Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Anderson-Darling goodness-of-fit tests, ninety percent confidence intervals on the Weibull parameters, and Kanofsky-Srinivasan ninety percent confidence band values are also provided. The probabilistic fast-fracture theories used in CARES, along with the input and output for CARES, are described. Example problems to demonstrate various feature of the program are also included. This manual describes the MSC/NASTRAN version of the CARES program.Document ID19900018783Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsNemeth, Noel N.*(Aerospace Design and Fabrication, Inc., Brook Park OH., United States)*Manderscheid, Jane M.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Gyekenyesi, John P.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1990Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberE-4722-1NAS 1.60:2916NASA-TP-2916Accession Number90N28099Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-1BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900018783.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
1210-AB32-2-1106.html[7/24/2015 5:52:35 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-fiqy

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1600

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Michell B

General Comment

Dear Government of the United States of America,

My parents raised me to work hard, save along the way and treat everyone the way I wanted to be treated. I do

 have my own 401K that I started when I was 25 and after 26 years, my account is holding strong. I do not need

 the government to tell me how to plan for my retirement. I've already done that.

Thank you

Michell B.

United States Concerned Citizen
-----Original Message----- 

From: DJDover321@aol.com [mailto:DJDover321@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 4:04 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 02, 2010 

No one is healthy without mental health. 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other health 

care. 

Thank you for ensuring that all health care coverage is included in a 

single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Deborah Dover 

PO Box 757 

Sonoita, AZ 85637
§ 25.450 Athletics. ( a ) *General.* No person shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, be treated differently from another person, or otherwise be discriminated against in any interscholastic, intercollegiate, club, or intramural athletics offered by a recipient, and no recipient shall provide any such athletics separately on such basis.
( b ) *Separate teams.* Notwithstanding the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, a recipient may operate or sponsor separate teams for members of each sex where selection for such teams is based upon competitive skill or the activity involved is a contact sport. However, where a recipient operates or sponsors a team in a particular sport for members of one sex but operates or sponsors no such team for members of the other sex, and athletic opportunities for members of that sex have previously been limited, members of the excluded sex must be allowed to try out for the team offered unless the sport involved is a contact sport. For the purposes of these Title IX regulations, contact sports include boxing, wrestling, rugby, ice hockey, football, basketball, and other sports the purpose or major activity of which involves bodily contact.
( c ) *Equal opportunity.* ( 1 ) A recipient that operates or sponsors interscholastic, intercollegiate, club, or intramural athletics shall provide equal athletic opportunity for members of both sexes. In determining whether equal opportunities are available, the designated agency official will consider, among other factors: ( i ) Whether the selection of sports and levels of competition effectively accommodate the interests and abilities of members of both sexes;
( ii ) The provision of equipment and supplies;
( iii ) Scheduling of games and practice time;
( iv ) Travel and per diem allowance;
( v ) Opportunity to receive coaching and academic tutoring;
( vi ) Assignment and compensation of coaches and tutors;
( vii ) Provision of locker rooms, practice, and competitive facilities;
( viii ) Provision of medical and training facilities and services;
( ix ) Provision of housing and dining facilities and services;
( x ) Publicity.
( 2 ) For purposes of paragraph (c)(1) of this section, unequal aggregate expenditures for members of each sex or unequal expenditures for male and female teams if a recipient operates or sponsors separate teams will not constitute noncompliance with this section, but the designated agency official may consider the failure to provide necessary funds for teams for one sex in assessing equality of opportunity for members of each sex.
( d ) *Adjustment period.* A recipient that operates or sponsors interscholastic, intercollegiate, club, or intramural athletics at the elementary school level shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than one year from September 29, 2000. A recipient that operates or sponsors interscholastic, intercollegiate, club, or intramural athletics at the secondary or postsecondary school level shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than three years from September 29, 2000.