alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page I of 2 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

Dnckct: IRS-2009-0008 

Request for Information for Paul Wellslonc and Pctc Donlerlici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: IRSr2009,0008-000 1 

Kequest for Info~mation Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Dumcntci Mcntal Health Parity 

and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: lKS-?(ITlrl-C)008-0046 

Cumrnenl on FR Doc # EY-09628 

Submitter Information 

Name: Charles Richard Harrison 

Addrcss: 

Iaguna Beach, CA, 

Submitter's Representative: Rick Harrison 

Organhation: Rick Harrison, MA, MFT 

General Comment 

Comments regarding Regulatury Guidance USCG-10U7-27022 

page 19 157,II B specific areas I and 4 

I arrl a clinical psychothetmpist who provides EEG biofeedback treatment to 

individuals with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Mood Disorders. 

EEG biofeedback is an mpirically validated and widely recognized effective 

non-medication treatment fur ADHD. as wcll as othcr conditions. '['here are over 

50 studies evaluating the effectiveness of EEG biofeedback in Ihe trcatmcnt of 

ADHI), Substa~~ce 1 Tse disorders and Autism. A recent review oi'this lileraturc 

concluded "EEG biofeedback ineets the American Academy of Child and Adulescmt 

Psychiatry criltrjja for" Clinical Cruideli~les "for treatment of ADHD." This means 

that EEG bio iedback rrrccts thc same criteria as medication for treating ADHD, 

and that EEG biofeedback "should always be considcrcd as rul intctvention for 

this disorder by the clinician". 

This service has been denied by Gwrgia Medicaid, Avtna, Urlitd Behavioral 

Health, Blue Cross, Cignsg and Ammigroup. 

This is limitation of an effictive and ~alidatcd trcatn~cnt for a mental health 

problem. The reasons given by Lllc itisurmcc companies for this denial fell into 

two categories: 1) our company does not mvcr biofccdback for Mental Health 
prc~blems or 2) thcrc is not yet sufficient evidence for the efficacy of EEG 

biofeedback. As such, they are using cvidcnce-bas4 cri terin that are far more 

restrictive for mental health services than the criteria which art: used for 

medical/surgical scrv~ccs. There are inany routine medical and surgical 

procedures which have Fir fcwcr controlled studies about their efficacy than 

does EEG biofeedback. These mdical and surgical procedures are generally not 

limited hecause of concerns abuui how many contrullcd studies have been 

pcrformd about them. 

We believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity 

statute should requirt. that employcrs and pla~ls pay for the same range and scope 

of services for Behavioral Treatments as lhey do for Mcd Surg benefits and that 

a plan cannot be rmre restrictive in their managed care criteria and rcvicws for 

MH and SA disorders when compared to Med Surg. Today plans are being more 

restrictive in how they rcvjcw evidenced-based Mental Health and Substance Abuse 

Treatments when compared to Md Surg trcatmnrs. Th~s violates both the intent 

and letter of the parity statute and we hope that the regulations will clarify 

that this can't continue.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1056.html[7/22/2015 7:10:06 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-jqxe

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1056

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Marvin Bennett

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan my own retirement
# C_2011139EN.01002601.xml

| 7.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/26

---

Action brought on 18 March 2011 — Petroci v Council

(Case T-160/11)

2011/C 139/49

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Petroci Holding (Abidjan, Ivory Coast) (represented by: M. Ceccaldi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Decision 2011/18/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 imposing restrictive measures against certain persons and entities including Petroci Holding; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Decision 2011/18/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 imposing restrictive measures against certain persons and entities including Petroci Holding;

| — | Order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicant are essentially identical with or similar to those raised in Case T-142/11 SIR v Council.

SIR

Council

---
Arizona Farm Bureau Federation

325 S. Higley Rd, Suite 210

Gilbert, AZ 85296

July 21, 2015

Employee Benefits Security Administration

Office of Regulations and Interpretations

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, NW

Room N-5655

Washington, DC 20210

Re: Definition of the Term “Fiduciary;” Conflict of Interest Rule –

Retirement Investment Advice

RIN 1210-AB32

Re: Proposed Best Interest Contract Exemption

ZRIN 1210-ZA25 

Re: Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited 

Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving 

Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Consultants, Insurance 

Companies and Investment Company Principal Underwriters

ZRIN 1210-ZA25

To Whom it May Concern:

I am the President of the Arizona Farm Bureau Federation, a member of the Board of 

Directors of Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company and am pleased to provide these 

comments with respect to the Department of Labor’s notice of proposed rulemaking 

concerning the Definition of the Term “Fiduciary” of an employee benefit plan (the 

“Proposed Regulation”), the related proposed Best Interest Contract Exemption (the 

“Proposed BIC Exemption”), and the proposed amendment to and proposed partial 

revocation of prohibited transaction exemption 84-24 (the “Proposed PTE 84-24 

Exemption Amendment”) (collectively, the “Proposal”).

The Arizona Farm Bureau Federation is a grassroots, statewide organization dedicated 

to helping Arizona farm families prosper and improve their quality of life. More than 

24,000 families in Arizona are Farm Bureau members, working together to achieve farm 

and rural prosperity.
Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company, is an Iowa domiciled life insurance company that 

markets life insurance and annuity products in the following states: Arizona, Kansas, 

Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, 

South Dakota, Utah, Wisconsin and Wyoming. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company 

provides insurance and financial services to Farm Bureau members and others in rural 

areas of the West and Midwest that other insurers have long since abandoned. 

Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company is a member of both the American Council of Life 

Insurers ("ACLI") and the Investment Retirement Institute ("IRI"). Our management has 

been working closely with both organizations with respect to comment letters those 

organizations are preparing and will be submitting in response to the above-referenced 

proposal. We strongly support and endorse the positions in the comment letters of both 

the ACLI and the IRI and ask that the Department of Labor address the issues raised in 

the letters of those two associations.

Sincerely,

Kevin Rogers, President

Arizona Farm Bureau Federation
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2321 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2321

     To direct the Secretary of Transportation to make a grant for 
    improvements to the New York City subway system, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 13, 1995

  Mr. Nadler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To direct the Secretary of Transportation to make a grant for 
    improvements to the New York City subway system, and for other 
                               purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``West Side Subway Corridor 
Improvements Act''.

SEC. 2. PURPOSES.

    The purposes of this Act are to--
            (1) make improvements to the New York subway system;
            (2) further comply with the Clean Air Act;
            (3) address transportation problems associated with the 
        growth in population on the West Side of New York City; and
            (4) address dangerous and overcrowded conditions at the 
        West 72nd Street subway station.

SEC. 3. GRANT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Transportation shall make a grant 
under chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, to the New York City 
Transit Authority for making improvements to the New York City subway 
system from the West 66th Street subway station to the West 72nd Street 
subway station. The project shall include the provision of temporary 
bus service from the West 72nd Street subway station to the Grand 
Central terminal in New York City while such improvements are being 
made.
    (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
under this section shall be 80 percent.
    (c) Grants as Contractual Obligations.--A grant approved by the 
Secretary under this section shall be a contractual obligation of the 
United States to pay the Federal Government's share of the project.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section from the Mass Transit Account of 
the Highway Trust Fund $43,000,000 for fiscal year 1997.
                                 <all>
```
§ 213.19 Information collection. ( a ) The information collection requirements of this part were reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*) and are assigned OMB control number 2130-0010.
( b ) The information collection requirements are found in the following sections: §§ 213.4, 213.5, 213.7, 213.17, 213.57, 213.119, 213.122, 213.233, 213.237, 213.241, 213.303, 213.305, 213.317, 213.329, 213.333, 213.339, 213.341, 213.343, 213.345, 213.353, 213.361, 213.369.
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0230 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Mary St. Clair, MSW 

Address: 

3674 Oakleaf Rd. 

West Bloomfield, MI, 48324 

Email: mary@flexiblebrain.com 

Phone: 248-366-6600 

General Comment 

I am a Licensed Clinical Social Worker. I am urging you to included benefits for 

biofeedback and neurofeedback in the scope of services covered by this act. 

These modalities have proven effective in treating multiple sympotms, with lasting 

results. Benefits for these services will ultimately save the insuance companies 

money because the symtpoms and underlying causes are relieved. Less drugs 

and doctors visits. Less hospitalizations. Thank you for your consideration. 

Mary St. Clair, LMSW 

West Bloomfield, MI 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 28, 2009 

Received: May 28, 2009 

Status: DoNotPost 

Tracking No. 809bbc8b 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web
#### Thomas Defreest, *Appellant,*v. Mary Alida Defreest and others, *Respondents.*

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Potter, J.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, August 4, 1995 (109), Para 109.28 George J. Mitchell Post Office]
[Page 1293]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.109.28  george j. mitchell post office

  On motion of Mr. McHUGH, by unanimous consent, the Committee on 
Government Reform and Oversight was discharged from further 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 2077) to designate the United States 
Post Office building located at 33 College Avenue in Waterville, Maine, 
as the ``George J. Mitchell Post Office Building''.
  When said bill was considered, read twice, ordered to be engrossed and 
read a third time, was read a third time by title, and passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the bill was passed was, by 
unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2061 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2061

 To designate the Federal building located at 1550 Dewey Avenue, Baker 
      City, Oregon, as the ``David J. Wheeler Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 1995

  Mr. Cooley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the Federal building located at 1550 Dewey Avenue, Baker 
      City, Oregon, as the ``David J. Wheeler Federal Building''.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 1550 Dewey Avenue, Baker City, 
Oregon, shall be known and designated as the ``David J. Wheeler Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``David J. Wheeler 
Federal Building''.
                                 <all>
```
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0727.html[7/21/2015 10:59:51 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-l5s4

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0727

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: William Bunyard

General Comment

Personal goals and achievements should not be negated by interference of those who are in authority. We should

 be able to design, drive our own creative ambitions of retirement without government redesigning, altering or

 modifying our dreams and schedules. Our independence, privacy, and freedoms have already been abused

 enough. Please do not regulate my retirement future.
JAMES THOMAS SMITH

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 4497

_____ ________________________/

Opinion filed August 15, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County.

Robert M. Foster , Judge

.

James Thomas Smith , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, THOMAS, and CLARK

, J J

. , CONCUR.
p.1 

OAR Box 1313 

Prepped by LaTeia Shed 

Document Number: 

79) ll-B-53 

Docket Number: 

A-88-02 

Printed 6/12/2008 9:03:31 AM Sheet 79 of 99 
P.2 

A-88-02 

Information on health or risk assessment was removed from the 

docket. This information was compiled before the Clean Air 

Act Amendments (1990) but was not used in the development of 

the chromium NESHAP. 

* V& \ 

#

 x 

N

 y<-jr. -ZSJ^ 

v\\-. .. . . <\ : 

VNWV V- ' --' 

55^
#### § 234.203 Control circuits.

All control circuits that affect the safe operation of a highway-rail grade crossing warning system shall operate on the fail-safe principle.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2448

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to make grants for the construction

of the Great Lakes International Air Cargo Superport at Youngstown

Warren Regional Airport in Vienna, Ohio.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 1995

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to make grants

for the construction of the Great Lakes International

Air Cargo Superport at Youngstown Warren Regional

Airport in Vienna, Ohio.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Great Lakes Inter5 national Air Cargo Superport Authorization Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 2448 IH

1 SEC. 2. GREAT LAKES INTERNATIONAL AIR CARGO

2 SUPERPORT.

3 (a) GRANTS.—The Secretary of Transportation shall

4 make grants to the Western Reserve Port Authority for

5 the construction of runways and taxiways at Youngstown

6 Warren Regional Airport in Vienna, Ohio. Such facilities

7 shall be known as the ‘‘Great Lakes International Air

8 Cargo Superport’’.

9 (b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—Grants under sub10 section (a) shall be made under such terms and conditions

11 as the Secretary determines appropriate. At a minimum,

12 such terms and conditions shall ensure that facilities con13 structed using amounts from such grants will be used sub14 stantially for the shipping of cargo by air.

15 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is

16 authorized to be appropriated out of the Airport and Air17 way Trust Fund established by section 9502 of the Inter18 nal Revenue Code of 1986 to carry out this section

19 $33,000,000 for fiscal years beginning after September

20 30, 1996. Such sums shall remain available until ex21 pended.

Æ
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph J. Lazzara, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Scientific Technologies Incorporated for the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly represents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Scientific Technologies Incorporated.

|Dated: May 13, 2005 | By:/s/Joseph J. Lazzara_______              
|------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|                    | Name: Joseph J. Lazzara                     
|                    | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer







I, Ralph S. Marimon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Scientific Technologies Incorporated for the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly represents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Scientific Technologies Incorporated.

|Dated: May 13, 2005 | By:/s/ Ralph Marimon_______                      
|------------------- | -------------------------------------------------
|                    | Name: Ralph Marimon                              
|                    | Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0511.html[7/20/2015 7:48:21 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-tydn

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0511

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Lawrence Harris

Address:

3222 Harris Circle

Palmyra, TN, 37142

Email: elcazador52@earthlink.net

Phone: 9313265620

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan for my own retirement. I do not need the government telling me what I can do with

 my money or what I can spend it on. 

It is not YOUR money! It is MY money! Keep your hands out of my retirement.
-----Original Message----- 

From: legalgirl1111@yahoo.com [mailto:legalgirl1111@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:02 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Donna Simpson 

11520 Venice Blvd., #2 

Los Angeles, CA 90066