alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.3****CEO CERTIFICATIONS**I, W. Douglas Parker, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of America West Airlines, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: April 26, 2007         /s/ W. Douglas Parker   Name:  W. Douglas Parker   Title:  Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 34.1


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of Ohio Edison Company:





We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying “Report on assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Asset-Backed Securities”, that  Ohio Edison Company (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the asset-backed securities transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving phase-in recovery property (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended , excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(i-v), 1122(d)(2)(i-vii), 1122(d)(3)(ii-iv), and 1122(d)(4)(i-v, viii-xiii, xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform or the servicing activities are applicable to the Platform but are excluded from the scope of management's assertion and are not reported on herein.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.











/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





March 29, 2016
|   | **Exhibit 23** |
|--------|----------------|

 

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-22553, 33-27417, 33-32224 and 33-17829) of AmBase Corporation, of our reports dated March 27, 2009 and March 27, 2008 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of AmBase Corporation, which appear in this Form 10-K.

 

/s/ UHY LLP

New Haven, Connecticut

March 27, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000020469
<NAME> UNITED MAGAZINE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,900
<INVENTORY>                                      2,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          170,000
<BONDS>                                         56,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (195,600)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,900
<SALES>                                        276,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               276,600
<CGS>                                          218,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               103,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (145,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (145,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (145,900)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (19.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (19.45)


</TABLE>
#### § 299.501 Purpose.

Through the requirements of this subpart, FRA learns the condition of the operating rules and practices in use by the railroad. The rules and practices covered by this subpart include the procedures for instruction and testing of all employees involved with the movement of rail vehicles, including drivers, on-board attendants, station platform attendants, general control center staff, and all maintenance staff, which are necessary to ensure that they possess the requisite skill and knowledge of the rules and operating practices to maintain the safety of the system.
EXHIBIT 10.25


 


Severance
Arrangements with Certain Executive Officers


 


Pursuant to resolutions adopted by the Board of
Directors of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) on December 19, 2001,
Michael F. Adams, the Company’s Vice President of New Ventures, and Kenneth J.
Luppi, the Company’s Vice President of Operations, are entitled to receive
payments equal to 26 weeks of base salary in the event that they are terminated
within one year of the date of a change in control of the Company.


 


Mark R. Tauscher, the Company’s
President and Chief Executive Officer, James G. Thomasch, the Company’s Senior
Vice President of Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer, and Dr. Robert I. Rudko, the Company’s Chief Scientist, are
separately entitled to receive severance payments pursuant to the terms of
their respective employment agreements with the Company.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 11:49 AM

Received: July 14, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyz-3tkv

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2231

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Pamela Trent

General Comment

With all due respect I do not need my government to help me plan for my retirement .. All I need 

from you is to protect our country from foreign invasion .

Regards,

Pam trent
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Joseph J. Lazzara, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Scientific
Technologies Incorporated for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly represents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Scientific Technologies Incorporated.

| | By:/s/Joseph J. Lazzara                     
| | --------------------------------------------
| | Name: Joseph J. Lazzara                     
| | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

---

I, Richard O. Faria, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Scientific
Technologies Incorporated for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly represents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Scientific Technologies Incorporated.

| | By:/s/Richard O. Faria                           
| | -------------------------------------------------
| | Name: Richard O. Faria                           
| | Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           OMEGA FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      This certification is intended to accompany Omega Financial Corporation's
(the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31,
2004 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. I, Daniel L. Warfel, hereby certify in my capacity as the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


                                             /s/ Daniel L. Warfel
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Daniel L. Warfel
                                             Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 5, 2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49755-49756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4230]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Policy Statement No. ANE-2007-35.23-1]


Policy for Electronic Propeller Control Systems, Sec. Sec.  35.21 
and 35.23

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION:  Notice of issuance; policy statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 49756]]

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces the 
availability of policy for certifying a propeller with an Electronic 
Propeller Control System (EPCS).

DATES: The FAA issued policy statement number ANE-2007-35.23-1 on 
August 22, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay Turnberg, FAA, Engine and 
Propeller Standards Staff, ANE-110, 12 New England Executive Park, 
Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2b414a52055f5e5945494e594c6b4d4a4a054c445d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0369627a2d7776716d61667164436562622d646c75">[email protected]</span></a>; telephone: (781) 
238-7116; fax: (781) 238-7199. The policy statement is available on the 
Internet at the following address: http://www.faa.gov. (click on the 
``Regulations and Policies'' tab, then ``Regulatory and Guidance 
Library''). If you do not have access to the Internet, you may request 
a copy of the policy by contacting the individual listed in this 
section.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published the policy at http://www.faa.gov/aircraft/draft_docs/ on September 27, 2006 to announce the 
availability of the proposed policy and invite interested parties to 
comment.
    We have filed in the docket all comments we received, as well as a 
report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel 
concerning this policy. The docket is available for public inspection. 
If you wish to review the docket in person, go to the above address 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays.

Background

    This FAA policy statement presents one method to obtain approval to 
certify a propeller with an Electronic Propeller Control System. This 
guidance may also be used for the development of special conditions 
that the Administrator may find necessary to establish a level of 
safety for propellers with an EPCS equivalent to that established by 
the existing airworthiness standards for propellers with conventional 
control systems.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701-44702, 44704.

    Dated: Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on August 22, 2007.
Mark A. Rumizen,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 07-4230 Filed 8-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

Created by Section 906

of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

The undersigned officer of FileNet Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

 (i)          the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

 (ii)         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  November 7, 2005 |  
 
*/s/ Sam M. Auriemma***

Sam M. Auriemma

Executive Vice President

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

  |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 350.219 How are MCSAP funds awarded under a continuing resolution or an extension of FMCSA's authorization?

In the event of a continuing resolution or an extension of FMCSA's authorization, subject to the availability of funding, FMCSA may first issue grants to States that have the lowest percent of undelivered obligations of the previous Federal fiscal year's funding, or as otherwise determined by the Administrator.
From: cynthia.norris@cardinal.com [mailto:cynthia.norris@cardinal.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 7:59 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

CINDY NORRIS 

319 GALATANEU NW 

ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87121
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                          84,913
<SECURITIES>                                    41,755
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,166
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,605
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               214,580
<PP&E>                                         131,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (92,462)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 263,441
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,001
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       149,873
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,012
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   263,441
<SALES>                                         53,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,802
<CGS>                                            7,180
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                55,084
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,625
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,156
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,469
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,469
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18



</TABLE>
BRUCE POLIQUIN 426 CANNON House OFFice BUILDING
Wasiineron, DC 20515
2no DistRict, MAINE 2
0 Dis: (202) 225-6306

COMMITTEE ON
FINANCIAL SERVICES

Congress of the United States
House of Representatives
Washington, BC 20515-1902

July 21, 2015

Mr. Thomas E. Perez
Office of the Secretary
Department of Labor

200 Constitution Ave. NW
Washington DC 20210

Dear Mr. Secretary,

Please accept this letter expressing my deep concerns about the impact of the Department of
Labor’s (“DOL”) April 14, 2015, proposed rule (RIN 1210-AB32) which applies a new
definition of a “fiduciary standard” for investment advisors under the Employee Retirement
Investment Security Act (ERISA). It is my belief that this proposal would hurt my constituents
who seek advice when planning for retirement.

The novel “Best Interest” standard envisioned by the rule would lead to much confusion about
the type of advice an investment advisor may offer to someone planning for retirement. The
restrictions contained in the rule will lead to many low and moderate income savers being unable
to afford and access these services. For example, the limits on commission based compensation
would price out modest income investors who cannot afford a fee based model when only
executing a limited number of investment transactions. Further, the restrictions on proprietary
products could have the adverse result of prohibiting an advisor from suggesting the best product
for an investor.

Retirement advice can be crucial assistance for someone looking to plan for the future. The
result of this rule would be to make retirement advice more expensive and offer the average
investor fewer options for retirement.

As a direct result of this rule, many families who plan for retirement will see reduced rates of
return and fewer retirement options. Our policies should make it easier to save for retirement
and reduce barriers for savers. It is my request that you withdraw this rule and protect our
families as they work hard to set aside for the future.

Sincerely,

Beuta bho

Bruce Poliquin
Member of Congress

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER,
# Map            North Korea.