alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 192

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

#### § 192.103 General.

Pipe must be designed with sufficient wall thickness, or must be installed with adequate protection, to withstand anticipated external pressures and loads that will be imposed on the pipe after installation.
Exhibit 32.1 CLARCOR Inc. Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Norman E. Johnson, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of CLARCOR Inc., hereby certify that the accompanying Annual Report of CLARCOR Inc. on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CLARCOR Inc.  January 22, 2010(Date)

          

          By

          

          /s/ Norman E. JohnsonNorman E. JohnsonChairman of the Board, President andChief Executive Officer
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–270 

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 3057, FOREIGN OPERATIONS, EXPORT FINANCING, AND 

RELATED PROGRAMS APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2006 

NOVEMBER 3, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida, from the Committee on 

Rules, submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 532] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 532, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report to accompany H.R. 3057, Foreign Relations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2006, and against 

its consideration. The rule further provides that the conference report shall be considered as read. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the conference report includes a waiver of clause 4(a) of rule XIII (requiring a three-day layover of the committee report), which is necessary because the conference report (H. Rept. 109–265) was not 

filed until Wednesday, November 2, 2005, and the conference report may be considered by the House as early as Friday, November 

4, 2005. 

Æ
March 20, 2006

To: Aurora Gold Corporation
30 Ledger Road,
Balcatta, Western Australia, 6021 Australia

Tel. 604-687-4432
Fax  604-687-4709

Attention: Cameron Richardson
Email: c.richardson@telus.net
       ----------------------


From: Tomas Almeida, Certified Translator

Re: Translation of Option Agreement regarding Ouro Mil Project



                            Translator's Declaration

I,  Tomas  Almeida,  Certified  Portuguese to English Translator, Member in good
standing  of  the  Society  of  Translators and Interpreters of British Columbia
(STIBC),  which  is  a  member  association  of  the  Canadian  Translators  and
Interpreters Council (CTIC), hereby attest that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, the above-mentioned document is a true, correct and complete translation
of  the  Portuguese  document  presented  to  me.


Tomas Almeida



Tomas Almeida
19780 Honeydew Drive
Pitt Meadows, BC V3Y 2S6

Tel. 604-465-6128
Fax 604-465-6129
Cell.604-202-0031
Email: talmeida@telus.net
       ------------------
#### § 22.69 Claim process.

After reasonable efforts have been exhausted to collect on a delinquent debt, the Participating Lender may demand in writing that DOT OSDBU honor its loan guarantee, provided however that the maximum liability of DOT OSDBU shall not at any time exceed the guaranteed amount. The borrower must be in default for no less than thirty (30) days, and the Participating Lender must have made written demand for payment from the borrower, in accordance with the guarantee agreement.
#### § 236.26 Buffing device, maintenance.

Buffing device shall be maintained so as not to cause the signal to display a less restrictive aspect than intended.
**EXHIBIT
23**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 **FIRSTENERGY
CORP.**
 
 **CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 We hereby consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.
333-48587, 333-102074 and 333-103865) and Form S-8 (No. 333-56094, 333-58279,
333-67798, 333-72766, 333-72768, 333-81183, 333-89356, 333-101472 and
333-110662) of FirstEnergy Corp. of our report dated February 27, 2007 relating
to the consolidated financial statements, management’s assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report
to Stockholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We
also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 27,
2007 relating to the financial statement schedules, which appears in this Form
10-K.
 
 
 
 
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
 
 Cleveland,
OH
 February 27,
2007
#### § 229.109 Safety valves.

Every steam generator shall be equipped with at least two safety valves that have a combined capacity to prevent an accumulation of pressure of more than five pounds per square inch above the allowed working pressure. The safety valves shall be independently connected to the separator and located as closely to the separator as possible without discharging inside of the generator compartment. The ends of the safety valve discharge lines shall be located or protected so that discharged steam does not create a hazard.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000019731
<NAME> CHESAPEAKE CORP /VA/
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       5,200,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              140,400,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,200,000
<INVENTORY>                                112,500,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           281,600,000
<PP&E>                                   1,456,400,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             675,500,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,146,300,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      139,300,000
<BONDS>                                    393,600,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    23,800,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 444,500,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,146,300,000
<SALES>                                  1,233,700,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,249,600,000
<CGS>                                      867,900,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,069,200,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,800,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             3,200,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          30,800,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            141,600,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                48,200,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         93,400,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                93,400,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.88
        

</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: pkbart44@yahoo.com [mailto:pkbart44@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:55 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Peter Bartash 

11 Brown Bear Circle 

Plymouth, MA 02360
#### JAMES J. O’DEA, Appellant, *v.*MARY O’DEA, Respondent.

*Action to have a ma/rriage declared void*— pozoer *of the court to awa/rd a counsel fee and alimony to the wife.*

In an action brought by a husband to have his marriage with the defendant declared void, on the ground that she had a former husband living at the time it was celebrated, the court has power to make an order allowing the defendant a counsel fee and alimony *pendente lite.*

Appeal from an order of the Monroe Special Term allowing the defendant a counsel fee and alimony *pendente lite*in an action *442brought by the husband to have the marriage declared void, on the ground that the defendant had a former husband living at the time of such marriage.

*P. B. jkhilett*and *E. P>. Smith,*for the appellant.

*Be L. & W. B. Crittenden,*for the respondent.

Smith, P. J.:

The counsel for the appellant contends that the Code of Civil Procedure has taken away the power of this court, as the successor of the Court of Chancery, to make such an order as is the subject of this appeal. His argument is that section 1769, which is the only section of the Code recognizing the power of the court to make an order of that kind, applies only to actions brought to obtain a divorce, absolute or limited, for a cause arising after marriage, and in that particular, has worked a change in the statute. Put there is no such change in fact. The statutory provision on the subject, previous to the Code, was contained in section 68. (2 P. S., 148.) That section is a part of “ article fifth,” the provisions of which were applicable only to the two preceding articles, and not to article second, which related to divorces on the ground of the nullity of the marriage contract. The term *“*divorce,” as used in section 58, referred only to a divorce for cause arising after marriage, as is apparent from the heading of “ article fifth.” This construction was given to section 58 by Papallo, J., in *Griffin*v. *Griffin,*(47 N. Y., 134, 136). That case, and numerous others there cited, hold that the power in question exists independently of statute, and as an incident to the jurisdiction of the court in actions for divorce on the ground of nullity. To the same effect is *Brinkley*v. *Brinkley*(50 N. Y., 184).

The motion for the order was noticed before the plaintiff appealed from the judgment of this court reversing the judgment of divorce, and the appeal did not affect the power of the Special Term to make the order.

The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

HaediN and BaeKEe, JJ., concurred.

Affirmed.
Kellon.borden@pegasusanc.com phone: 907-243-314 4

3901 w. old international airport rd. • Anchorage, AK 99502 USA 

### October 1, 2015

To Whom It May Concern,

Pegasus Aviation Services, LLC (Air Agency Certific ate Number UPUR695X and Certificated Satellite Repair Station UPUD695X) would like to su bmit this petition for an exemption from FAR Part 145, §145.103(b); which states, “A certifi cated repair station with an airframe rating must provide suitable permanent housing to enclose the largest type and model of aircraft listed on its operations specifications.

Pegasus Aviation Services, LLC (PMX) would like thi s petition to cover the primary Certificated Repair Station (CRS) in Anchorage Alaska as well as any current or future D107 or Satellite Repair Station Locations.

PMX’s current Operations Specifications grant a lim ited airframe and power plant rating so PMX may provide line maintenance, transit maintenance, and “A checks” for our customers. The nature of these transits include a short ground time with just enough time to provide crew transfer, fueling of the aircraft, and cargo movement as requ ired. Due to the tight schedule in which our customers operate, any required line maintenance is expected to be performed at the aircraft parking location, which can vary on the airfield, a llowing the other contracted services to be completed during maintenance. In the fifteen years of PMX’s existence, hanger maintenance has not been an issue due to the fact that Pegasus has the required equipment to ensure article protection and segregation as required from the ele ments and environment, while ensuring maintenance accuracy, per Federal Aviation Regulati ons as well as the Regulations imposed by our customer’s Authorities, in challenging work env ironments. PMX has temporary structures, heating units and storage equipment to ensure all m aintenance is performed safely and securely in compliance with required regulations. The temporary structures mentioned can be used to both protect the articles being maintained and the Techn icians performing the work to prevent impaired maintenance per the customer’s Continuous Airworthiness Maintenance Program (CAMP) and PMX’s Repair Station Manual (RSM) and Qu ality System Manual (QSM) especially during the longer ground times required for “A checks.”

It is in the public’s interest to allow this exempt ion as doing so will allow our customer’s to operate in accordance with their maintenance progra ms at the outstation locations that PMX

operates.

Best Regards,

Kellon Borden Quality System Manager & Director of Training

907-317-3083 Pegasus Aviation Services, LLC.
From: btdeputy08@aol.com [mailto:btdeputy08@aol.com] 

Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 4:38 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Medical Equipment Needs

I would like to suggest that if there is a need of any type of HME/Home Medical 

Equipment or DME/Durable Medical Equipment to be used on a regular basis that if you 

would consider those items as well. I work for a DME provider & if I'm thinking 

correctly there was a person who was considered blind & her state insurance did not 

cover the cost of a cane for the blind. Those are not an inexpensive item to have to pay 

for out of pocket. Her case came to mind when I read this notice. 

Thank you, 

Sheryl Eisler
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 6/24/15 9:49 PM

Received: June 24, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jlw-nbrz

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0331

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Michael Fox

General Comment

1, Rather than go through all the gyrations, simply limit the maximum compensation for an 

advisor. Since almost all financial

services organizations have a "volume discount" price range, use an average of them, e.g. 

$<25,000 = maximum 1.00%

$ 25,001 - 250,000 = maximum .75%

etc.

$ $1,000,000 or more .25% (A Shares @ NAV.)

2. Run the above across ALL product lines including insurance and annuities and LPs.

3. If someone is found violating fiduciary rule - lifetime bar from industry with some appeal 

mechanism.

These would protect the small investor without burdening a professional with another 300 pages 

of forms.

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b539d8&format=xml&show... 6/24/2015
§ 176.200 General stowage requirements. ( a ) Each package of Class 2 (compressed gas) material being transported by vessel must be prevented from making direct contact with the vessel's deck, side, or bulwark by dunnage, shoring, or other effective means.
( b ) When cylinders of Class 2 (compressed gas) materials being transported by vessel are stowed in a horizontal position, each tier must be stowed in the cantlines of the tier below it, and the valves on cylinders in adjacent tiers must be at alternate ends of the stow. Each tier may be stepped back and the ends alternated in order to clear the flange. Lashing must be provided to prevent any shifting.
( c ) When cylinders of Class 2 (compressed gas) materials being transported by vessel are stowed in a vertical position they must be stowed in a block and cribbed or boxed-in with suitable sound lumber and the box or crib dunnaged to provide clearance from a steel deck at least 10 cm (3.9 inches) off any metal deck. Pressure receptacles in the box or crib must be braced to prevent any shifting of the pressure receptacles. The box or crib (gas rack) must be securely chocked and lashed to prevent shifting in any direction.
( d ) Any package containing Division 2.3 (poison gas) materials must be stowed separate from all foodstuffs.
( e ) Class 2 (compressed gas) materials may not be stowed “on deck” over a hold or compartment containing coal.
( f ) Class 2 (compressed gas) material must be kept as cool as practicable and be stowed away from all sources of heat and ignition. Any package containing a Division 2.1 (flammable gas) material is restricted from transport in powered refrigerated temperature controlled containers, unless the equipment is capable of preventing ignition of flammable vapors by having non-sparking or explosion-proof electric fittings within the cooling compartment.
[Amdt. 176-30, 55 FR 52704, Dec. 21, 1990 , as amended at 68 FR 61942, Oct. 30, 2003; 74 FR 16143, Apr. 9, 2009; 78 FR 1095, Jan. 7, 2013; 85 FR 83402, Dec. 21, 2020]
§ 240.107 Types of service. ( a ) Each railroad's program shall state which of the three classes of service, provided for in paragraph (b) of this section, that it will cover.
( b ) A railroad may issue certificates for any or all of the following classes of service: ( 1 ) Train service engineers,
( 2 ) Locomotive servicing engineers, and
( 3 ) Student engineers.
( c ) The following operational constraints apply to each class of service: ( 1 ) Train service engineers may operate locomotives singly or in multiples and may move them with or without cars coupled to them;
( 2 ) Locomotive servicing engineers may operate locomotives singly or in multiples but may not move them with cars coupled to them; and
( 3 ) Student engineers may operate only under direct and immediate supervision of an instructor engineer.
( d ) Each railroad is authorized to impose additional conditions or operational restrictions on the service an engineer may perform beyond those identified in this section provided those conditions or restrictions are not inconsistent with this part.
( e ) A railroad shall not reclassify the certification of any type of certified engineer to a more restrictive class of certificate or a student engineer certificate during the period in which the certification is otherwise valid.
[56 FR 28254, June 19, 1991, as amended at 74 FR 68182, Dec. 23, 2009; 85 FR 81309, Dec. 15, 2020]
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 830

To amend the Defense Dependents’ Education Act of 1978 to allow home

school students who are eligible for enrollment in a school of the overseas

defense dependents’ education system to use the auxiliary services of

such schools.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 2001

Mr. HOSTETTLER (for himself, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. RYUN of

Kansas, Mr. AKIN, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. SMITH of

New Jersey, Mr. WOLF, Mr. PAUL, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. SCHAFFER, Mr.

TANCREDO, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. HILLEARY, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. JONES of

North Carolina, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr.

TOOMEY, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. HERGER, Mr. ISTOOK, and Mr. PITTS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Defense Dependents’ Education Act of 1978

to allow home school students who are eligible for enrollment in a school of the overseas defense dependents’

education system to use the auxiliary services of such

schools.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 830 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Home School

3 Children Equal Access Act of 2001’’.

4 SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF AUXILIARY SERVICES OF DE5 FENSE DEPENDENTS’ EDUCATION SYSTEM

6 FOR DEPENDENTS WHO ARE HOME SCHOOL

7 STUDENTS.

8 Section 1407 of the Defense Dependents’ Education

9 Act of 1978 (20 U.S.C. 926) is amended—

10 (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub11 section (e); and

12 (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol13 lowing new subsection:

14 ‘‘(d) AUXILIARY SERVICES AVAILABLE TO HOME

15 SCHOOL STUDENTS.—(1) A dependent who is educated in

16 a home school setting, but who is eligible to enroll in a

17 school of the defense dependents’ education system, shall

18 be permitted to use or receive auxiliary services of that

19 school without being required to either enroll in that

20 school or register for a minimum number of courses of21 fered by that school.

22 ‘‘(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term ‘auxil23 iary services’ includes registration in individual courses,

24 use of academic resources, access to the library of the

25 school, after hours use of school facilities, and participa-
3

•HR 830 IH

1 tion in music, sports, and other extracurricular and inter2 scholastic activities.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT
10.23


 


Compensatory Arrangements with Executive Officers


 


Base Salary


 


The current annual base salaries of each of
the executive officers of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) are as follows:


 


	
  Mark R.
  Tauscher, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  286,841

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  James G.
  Thomasch, Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration,

  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  180,081

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Dr. Robert I.
  Rudko, Chief Scientist

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  198,275

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Michael F.
  Adams, Vice President of New Ventures

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  169,744

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Kenneth J.
  Luppi, Vice President of Operations

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  147,583

  	
   

  



 


Cash
Bonus Compensation


 


On February 1, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) of the Company adopted bonus
arrangements for its executive officers for 2006. Messrs. Tauscher, Thomasch,
Adams,  Luppi  and Rudko will receive a bonus based 25% on
the financial performance of the Company’s business and 75% on the attainment
of defined program milestones during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. The
target bonus payment for Mr. Tauscher is 50% of his base salary, for Mr.
Thomasch 40% of his base salary, and for Messrs. Adams, Luppi and Rudko is 30%
of each of their respective base salaries. The target bonus payments may be
adjusted downwards if the financial performance of the Company’s business does
not meet the targets or the Company does not attain the defined program
milestones.


 


Other Compensation


 


Mr. Tauscher and Mr. Thomasch each currently
receive an annual car allowance of $12,000. Mr. Adams, Mr. Luppi and Dr. Rudko
each currently receive an annual car allowance of $6,000.


 


The Compensation Committee may also, from
time to time, award each of the executive officers compensation in the form of
stock options granted under the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.