alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0643.html[7/21/2015 8:02:04 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-6foq

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0643

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Kelly Proctor

Address:

969 N Jones Blvd #5

Tucson, AZ, 85716

General Comment

Dear Sir/Madam,

I understand YOU want to plan my retirement with MY money - 401K and IRA's. PLEASE don't bother, and I

 resent you even think you are better and that you know what's better for me, that's the kind of thinking that got

 Greece into trouble. So please don't touch my retirement which I have earned MYSELF and not you.

Thank you for your time

Kelly B Proctor
§ 375.515 May an individual shipper waive his/her right to observe each weighing? ( a ) If an individual shipper elects not to observe a weighing, the shipper is presumed to have waived that right.
( b ) If an individual shipper elects not to observe a reweighing, the shipper must waive that right in writing. The individual shipper may send the waiver notification via fax transmission; e-mail; overnight courier; or certified mail, return receipt requested.
( c ) Waiver of the right to observe a weighing or re-weighing does not affect any other rights of the individual shipper under this part or otherwise.
[68 FR 35091, June 11, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 10576, Mar. 5, 2004]
#### § 29.911 What is the effect of a pending appeal on negotiations?

A pending appeal of a pre-award decision will not prevent the Department from negotiating and executing the non-disputed, severable provisions of a compact or funding agreement or prevent the Department from awarding funds to the Tribe that may be included in a funding agreement.
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.205 Repair, alteration and reconstruction of aboveground breakout tanks that have been in service. ( a ) Aboveground breakout tanks that have been repaired, altered, or reconstructed and returned to service must be capable of withstanding the internal pressure produced by the hazardous liquid to be stored therein and any anticipated external loads.
( b ) After October 2, 2000, compliance with paragraph (a) of this section requires the following: ( 1 ) For tanks designed for approximate atmospheric pressure, constructed of carbon and low alloy steel, welded or riveted, and non-refrigerated; and for tanks built to API Std 650 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3) or its predecessor Standard 12C; repair, alteration; and reconstruction must be in accordance with API Std 653 (except section 6.4.3) (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3).
( 2 ) For tanks built to API Spec 12F (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3) or API Std 620 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3), repair, alteration, and reconstruction must be in accordance with the design, welding, examination, and material requirements of those respective standards.
( 3 ) For high-pressure tanks built to API Std 2510 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3), repairs, alterations, and reconstruction must be in accordance with API Std 510 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3).
[Amdt. 195-66, 64 FR 15935, Apr. 2, 1999, as amended by Amdt. 195-99, 80 FR 186, Jan. 5, 2015; 80 FR 46848, Aug. 6, 2015]
#### § 234.219 Gate arm lights and light cable.

Each gate arm light shall be maintained in such condition to be properly visible to approaching highway users. Lights and light wire shall be secured to the gate arm.
December 11, 2008
    
    $1,000,000,000
  Term
 Payments
 Application of Payments
 Interest Payments
 Principal Prepayment at Companys Option
 Method of Payment




---



##### 



Ranking of Note pari
passu LL NN TAT
 Governing Law
 Transfer Restrictions
   Notices
 Integration
 Miscellaneous
 2




---



##### 



CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANYBy:
    
    /s/ LAWRENCE J. BOYSENLawrence J. BoysenSenior Vice President and ControllerAttest:By:
    
    /s/ MEGHAN K. JOHNSONName: Meghan K. JohnsonTitle: Assistant Secretary
 3




---



##### 



Amount of
    
    UnpaidAmount of
    
    Date
    
    Principal
    
    Principal
    
    NotationDate
    
    Principal
    
    Repaid
    
    Repayment
    
    Balance
    
    Made By11-7-08
    
    1,000,000,000.00
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    B.C.
 4
Opinion issued February 12, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-01028-CV

———————————

IN RE TEXAS CONSTRUCTION SPECIALISTS, L.L.C., Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Texas Construction Specialists, L.L.C., has filed a petition for a writ 

of mandamus challenging “[t]he trial court’s refus[al] to hear or rule upon Relator’s 

motions for continuance” of a November 26, 2018 trial setting.1 With its petition, 

 

1 The underlying case is Texas Construction Specialists, L.L.C. v. Supreme Dump 

Trucks and Trailers of Houston, L.L.C., cause number 16-CV-1259, in the 405th

District Court of Galveston County, Texas. The petition names the Honorable 

Michelle Slaughter as respondent in this original proceeding. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.2. Judge Slaughter has ceased to be the presiding judge of the 405th District 
2

relator moved for a stay of the trial court proceedings. On November 19, 2018, we 

granted relator’s motion and stayed the underlying trial court proceedings. On 

January 15, 2019, we vacated that order.

Also, on January 15, 2019, the Clerk of this Court notified the parties that, 

because the trial setting had effectively been continued and the proceeding appeared 

moot, the Court may dismiss the petition unless the parties filed a response 

demonstrating that the Court has jurisdiction over the proceeding. Cf. TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3. No party has responded. Further, we conclude that any challenge to the 

trial court’s refusal to consider relator’s motions for a continuance of the November 

26, 2018 trial setting has become moot. See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 

S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) (“A case becomes moot if a 

controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings

. . . .”); In re S. Nurseries, Inc., No. 13-09-00661-CV, 2009 WL 4893195, at *1 (Tex. 

App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg Dec. 17, 2009, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). 

(dismissing as moot mandamus petition challenging trial court’s refusal to abate trial 

after trial court granted continuance).

 

Court. Because relator’s petition has become moot, in the interest of judicial 

economy and for good cause, we suspend the application of Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 7.2(b) to the extent abatement of this case may be mandatory. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 2, 7.2(b).
3

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Countiss.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41185 Summary Calendar

LYNN HENTON,
Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

WILLIAM STEPHENS , Individual capacity ; LORIE DAVIS, Professional capacity; HERMAN WESTON, JR.; RICHARD D. WALTON; UNKNOWN MARSHALL; CAPTAIN CARL N. BURSON,
Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 3:14 -CV- 345

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Lynn Henton, Texas prisoner # 694606, has filed this interloc utory appeal in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action to challenge the district court’s denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction. Henton argues that he is entitled to a preliminary injunction as to each of the following claims: (1) the “no -talking” policy; (2) the grooming policy; (3) the conditions of confinement; (4) the access

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 3, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41185 Document: 00513936752 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/03/2017No. 15

- 41185

2 to legal materials and the courts; (5) the indigent mail policy; (6) prisoner “compensation” for work performed; and (7) the physical condition of the correctional officers. We review a district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction for abuse of discretion. PCI Transp., Inc. v. Fort Worth & Western R.R. Co. , 418 F.3d 535, 545 (5th Cir. 2005). A movant is entitled to the “extraordinary remedy” of a preliminary injunction only if he establishes (1) a “substantial likelihood” that he will succeed on the merits, (2) a substantial threat that he will be irreparably injured if the injunction does not issue, (3) that the threatened injury outweighs any harm resulting from the grant of the injunction, and (4) that the injunction “will not disserve the public interest.” Byrum v.
Landreth , 566 F.3d 442, 445 (5th Cir. 2009) (citation omitted). The movant carries “‘a heavy burden of persuading the district court that all four elements are satisfied,’” and failure to carry the burden on any one of the elements will result in a denial of injunctive relief. Enterprise Int’l, Inc. v. Corporacion
Estatal Petrolera Ecuatoriana , 762 F.2d 464, 472 (5th Cir. 1985) (citation omitted). Henton has not made the showing required for injunctive relief with respect to any of his claims. In addition, H enton appeals the district court denial of his motion for class certification. We decline to exercise our discretion to permit the appeal.
F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 23(f).
AFFIRMED. Case: 15-41185 Document: 00513936752 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/03/2017
-----Original Message----- 

From: seno2002@earthlink.net [mailto:seno2002@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:09 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sharon Eno 

1702 NE 179th St. # 203 

Shoreline, WA 98155
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 179 (Monday, September 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 52952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4450]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>10927 and <greek-i>10928]


Oklahoma Disaster Number OK-00012

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 5.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Oklahoma (FEMA-1712-DR), dated 07/07/
2007.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 06/10/2007 through 07/25/2007.
    Effective Date: 08/29/07.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/05/07.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/07/2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Oklahoma, dated 07/07/2007 is hereby 
amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical 
damages as a result of this disaster to 10/05/2007.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 07-4450 Filed 9-14-07; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
§ 231.28 Box and other house cars with roof hatches built or placed in service after October 1, 1966. The specifications of § 231.27 shall apply except as to the following: ( a ) *Running boards.* Same as specified in § 231.1, except: the end of longitudinal running board shall be not less than six (6) inches from a vertical plane parallel with end of car and passing through the inside face of knuckle when closed with coupler horn against buffer block or end sill.
( b ) *Ladders* — ( 1 ) *Number.* Two (2).
( 2 ) *Dimensions.* ( i ) Minimum clear length of tread: Sixteen (16) inches.
( ii ) Maximum spacing between treads nineteen (19) inches.
( 3 ) *Location.* One (1) on each end of car not more than eight (8) inches from left-hand side.
( 4 ) *Manner of application.* Same as specified in § 231.1.
( c ) *Roof handholds* — ( 1 ) *Number.* Two (2), one (1) over each ladder.
( 2 ) *Dimensions.* Same as specified in § 231.1.
( 3 ) *Location.* On roof of car. One (1) parallel to treads of each ladder, not less than eight (8) nor more than fifteen (15) inches from edge of roof, except on refrigerator cars where ice hatches prevent, when location may be nearer edge of roof.
( 4 ) *Manner of application.* Same as specified in § 231.1.
( d ) *End handholds.* (Treads of end ladders are end handholds.) Same as specified for § 231.27.
( e ) *Existing box and other house cars with roof hatches.* Box and other house cars with roof hatches built on or before April 1, 1966, or under construction prior thereto and placed in service before October 1, 1966, shall be deemed equipped as nearly as possible within the intent of § 231.1 and of this section when: Equipped as specified in § 231.1, except (1) the side ladder treads above the fourth tread from bottom of side ladder near “A” end of car and roof handhold over the side ladder near “A” end shall be removed; (2) and (1) end platform handhold shall be provided on each end of car as specified in § 231.27(i); and when handbrake is operated near roof of car a brake step shall be provided as specified by § 231.1 or when handbrake is operated from approximate level of top of end sill the roof handhold over side ladder near “B” end and treads above the fourth tread from bottom of side ladder near “B” end shall be removed and a brake step as specified in § 231.1 shall be used with top of tread surface level with or not more than four (4) inches below adjacent end handhold.
(Secs. 2, 4, and 6, 27 Stat. 531, as amended; secs, 1 and 3, 32 Stat. 943, as amended; sec. 6(e) and (f), 80 Stat. 939 (45 U.S.C. 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10, 11-16 and 49 U.S.C. 103(c)(1))
[33 FR 19663, Dec. 25, 1968, as amended at 49 FR 26745, June 29, 1984]
§ 178.318-2 Container. ( a ) Every container for detonators and percussion caps coming within the scope of this specification shall be constructed entirely of hard rubber, phenolresinous or other resinous material, or other nonmetallic, nonsparking material, except that metal parts may be used in such locations as not in any event to come in contact with any of the caps. Space shall be provided so that each detonator of whatever nature may be inserted in an individual cell in the body of the container, into which each such cap shall snugly fit. There shall be provided no more than twenty (20) such cellular spaces. Space may be provided into which a plurality of percussion caps may be carried, provided that such space may be closed with a screw cap, and further provided that each or any such space is entirely separate from any space provided for any detonator. Each cellular space into which a detonator is to be inserted and carried shall be capable of being covered by a rotary cover so arranged as to expose not more than one cell at any time, and capable of rotation to such a place that all cells will be covered at the same time, at which place means shall be provided to lock the cover in place. Means shall be provided to lock in place the cover for the cells provided for the carrying of detonators. The requirement that not more than one cell be exposed at one time need not apply in the case of detonators, although spaces for such caps and detonators shall be separate. Sufficient annular space shall be provided inside the cover for such detonators that, when the cover is closed, there will be sufficient space to accommodate the wires customarily attached to such caps. If the material is of such a nature as to require treatment to prevent the absorption of moisture, such treatment shall be applied as shall be necessary in order to provide against the penetration of water by permeation. A suitable carrying handle shall be provided, except for which handle no part of the container may project beyond the exterior of the body.
( b ) Exhibited in plates I and II are line drawings of a container for detonators and percussion caps, illustrative of the requirements set forth in § 178.318-2(a). These plates shall not be construed as a part of this specification.
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Tri-Valley Corporation. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   | March 22, 2011                                                                    |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:               | /s/ Maston N. Cunningham                                                          |
|              | Maston N. Cunningham, President and Chief Executive OfficerTri-Valley Corporation |
EXHIBIT 21

                               AMBASE CORPORATION
                               SUBSIDIARY LISTING
                             AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Jurisdiction                   Percentage Voting
                                                     In Which                       Securities Owned By
Name                                                 Organized                      Immediate Parent
==================================================== ============================== ================================
<S>                                                  <C>                            <C>

AmBase Corporation                                   Delaware                       N/A

     Carteret Bancorp, Inc.                          Delaware                       100%

     Home Capital Services, Inc.                     Delaware                       100%

     Maiden Lane Associates, Ltd.                    Delaware                       100%

     SDG Financial Corp.                             Delaware                       100%

</TABLE>

Note:    Interrelationships shown by indentation with 100% ownership unless
         otherwise indicated.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                Nov-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     Feb-28-1999
<CASH>                           1,588,592
<SECURITIES>                     000
<RECEIVABLES>                    290,000
<ALLOWANCES>                     000
<INVENTORY>                      000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 000
<PP&E>                           000
<DEPRECIATION>                   000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   9,204,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            334,790
<BONDS>                          000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            000
<PREFERRED>                      000
<COMMON>                         000
<OTHER-SE>                       8,869,391
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     9,204,181
<SALES>                          417,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 461,383
<CGS>                            000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 239,452
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  000
<INCOME-TAX>                     000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              221,931
<DISCONTINUED>                   000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  000
<CHANGES>                        000
<NET-INCOME>                     221,931
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    2.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                    2.20
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSE MORALES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D23-69

[April 6, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Marina Garcia-Wood, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 04-6537CF10B.

Jose Morales, Century, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CONNER, and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Lydia J. Roberts, Respondent, v. Stuyvesant Safe Deposit Company of the City of New York. Appellant.

Order modified as directed in opinion, and affirmed as modified, without costs to either party. Opinion by

Brady, J.