July 3, 2006 SC-03 – UST Cost Comparison 1

Task Order No. 1010 – General Technical and Programmatic Support in 

Implementing the Energy Policy Act of 2005

Task 1010-04 – Technical Research/Analysis And Summarize Information 

Subject 4 – Secondary Containment

Subtask SC-03

E

2

Inc. asked seven UST installers to estimate the equipment and installation costs for 

various types of UST systems. Twelve types of UST systems were considered: six with 

single-walled tanks and piping and six with double-walled tanks and piping. Three types 

of tanks were considered: steel with corrosion protection (sti-P3®), fiberglass, and clad 

steel (ACT 100®). Two types of piping were considered: fiberglass and flexible plastic. 

E

2

Inc. selected installers to interview by consulting Robert Renkes, executive vice 

president of the Petroleum Equipment Institute (PEI), and Wayne Geyer, executive vice 

president of the Steel Tank Institute (STI). Mr. Renkes suggested searching for installers 

on PEI’s searchable online directory.

1

 Mr. Geyer provided a list of installers, most of 

whom were not STI members. E2Inc. narrowed down Mr. Geyer’s list by eliminating 

installers not listed in PEI’s directory. From this narrowed-down list, E2Inc. selected 

installers with the goal of representing as many of the country’s regions as possible. In 

order to include an installer from Florida, E2Inc. selected the installer in PEI’s directory 

with the most Florida branch locations. E2Inc. also selected from PEI’s directory an 

installer with many branches in the Southeast, to replace another, unresponsive Southeast 

installer. The purpose of selecting installers from various regions was to take into 

account regional differences in UST system costs, stemming from differences in labor 

costs (union versus non-union), regulatory requirements, and the overall cost of doing 

business.

In addition to the types of tanks and piping, the installers were given the following 

specifications. Each facility’s equipment includes three USTs, 300 feet of piping, four 

dispensers, a point-of-sale (POS) system, a tank monitoring system (if one is usually

included), and an intercom (if one is usually included). The installers were asked to 

assume that the tanks are not compartmented or manifolded, there is no stage one or two 

vapor recovery, and the installation is at a virgin site (that is, there is no previous 

contamination to clean up). The cost of installation includes excavation, tank installation, 

piping installation, dispenser installation, ancillary equipment installation, and paving. 

Most of the installers stated that they were given insufficient information about the UST 

system components and site-specific conditions, rendering their cost estimates rough and 

inaccurate. Site-specific conditions and the specific types of equipment installed are both 

highly variable, yielding wide ranges of potential costs for each UST system specified. 

Appendix A lists variables that the installers said would assist in cost estimation. Several 

installers stated that 300 feet of piping is either insufficient or unrealistic for the types of 

facilities that are currently being built; they said that 500 to 1,000 feet of piping is typical 

for facilities with three tanks. 

 

1

http://www.pei.org/search/advanced.asp
July 3, 2006 SC-03 – UST Cost Comparison 2

Table 1 presents a summary of the installers’ cost estimates. Appendix B presents each 

installer’s cost estimates. Not all installers provided cost estimates for every type of UST 

system. Because of the piecemeal nature of the responses and the small sample size, the 

figures in Table 1 should be interpreted cautiously. For example, the installers based in 

California and Florida did not estimate costs for steel tanks or for single-walled systems, 

because they do not install such systems. Because of these omissions, and the fact that 

the California and Florida installers reported much higher installation costs than did the 

other installers, the average installation cost for double-walled fiberglass and clad steel 

systems is skewed upwards. The installation costs from installers who reported costs for 

a wider array of UST systems indicate that there does not appear to be a large variation in 

total installation cost across UST system types. A smaller skewing effect resulted from 

another installer who provided figures only for systems with fiberglass piping, because he 

does not use flexible plastic piping. Because his cost estimates were higher than average, 

the average costs in the summary table for all of the systems with fiberglass piping are 

inflated relative to the flexible plastic systems. Most installers did report higher costs for 

systems with fiberglass piping, but the difference is not as large as the summary table 

implies. 

For those wishing to compare the costs of single-walled UST systems with the costs of 

double-walled UST systems, Table 2 provides such a comparison by presenting means 

that exclude those installers who did not provide cost estimates for both types of systems. 

By excluding those installers, a more realistic cost comparison is possible. However, the 

small sample size is still a concern; the means are based on data from four to five 

installers.

When respondents provided a numerical range as an answer, this report uses the midpoint 

of the range as representative of a typical value. 
July 3, 2006 SC-03 – UST Cost Comparison 3

Table 1: Mean UST Equipment and Installation Costs.

Type Of 

Tanks

Type of 

Piping

Cost of 

Equipment

Cost of 

Installation Total Cost

Fiberglass 129,328 87,259 216,587

Flexible 

Plastic 124,219 79,625 203,844

Fiberglass 132,007 92,386 224,393

Flexible 

Plastic 127,344 80,875 208,219

Fiberglass 122,710 91,074 213,784

Flexible 

Plastic 112,292 81,833 194,125

Fiberglass 154,153 91,458 245,611

Flexible 

Plastic 147,619 82,500 230,119

Fiberglass 145,499 126,215 271,715

Flexible 

Plastic 135,979 124,550 260,529

Fiberglass 137,067 122,941 260,008

Flexible 

Plastic 130,063 122,217 252,279

Notes:

1) The costs of different UST system types should not be compared without consulting the 

 individual installers' data provided in Appendix B. Because of the small sample size and 

 piecemeal nature of the responses, the mean costs of some UST system types are skewed

 upward relative to other system types.

2) Each of these mean values does not include installers who did not provide cost estimates 

 for that UST system type.

3) Equipment cost includes: three USTs, 300 feet of piping, four dispensers, and a POS system. 

 Most installers also included a tank monitoring system and intercom.

4) Installation cost includes: excavation; tank, piping, dispenser, and ancillary equipment

 installation; and paving.

 Single-Walled Tanks & Piping

Fiberglass

Clad Steel 

(ACT 100)

Steel w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Steel w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Fiberglass

Clad Steel 

(ACT 100)

 Double-Walled Tanks & Piping
July 3, 2006 SC-03 – UST Cost Comparison 4

SinglewalledDoublewalled% 

Difference

SinglewalledDoublewalled% 

Difference

SinglewalledDoublewalled% 

Difference

Fiberglass 129,328 154,153 19% 87,259 91,458 5% 216,587 245,611 13%

Flexible 

Plastic 124,219 147,619 19% 79,625 82,500 4% 203,844 230,119 13%

Fiberglass 132,007 160,299 21% 92,386 94,041 2% 224,393 254,341 13%

Flexible 

Plastic 127,344 149,719 18% 80,875 83,500 3% 208,219 233,219 12%

Fiberglass 122,710 141,117 15% 91,074 95,447 5% 213,784 236,564 11%

Flexible 

Plastic 112,292 128,792 15% 81,833 85,167 4% 194,125 213,958 10%

Notes:

1) "Single-walled" denotes single-walled tanks and piping. "Double-walled" denotes double-walled tanks and piping.

2) Equipment cost includes: three USTs, 300 feet of piping, four dispensers, and a POS system. Most installers also included a tank monitoring system

 and intercom.

3) Installation cost includes: excavation; tank, piping, dispenser, and ancillary equipment installation; and paving.

Cost of Equipment Cost of Installation Total Cost

Type Of 

Tanks

Type of 

Piping

Table 2: Mean Costs and Comparisons Between Single- and Double-Walled UST Systems, Excluding Installers Who Did Not Provide Cost 

Estimates for Both Single-Walled and Double-Walled Systems.

Steel w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Fiberglass

Clad Steel 

(ACT 100)
July 3, 2006 SC-03 – UST Cost Comparison 5

Installers Interviewed:

 Bruce Brown of Adams Tank and Lift, Inc. based in Florida

 Duane Grippe of O’Day Equipment, Inc. based in North Dakota

 Ken Korneychuk, Denver division manager of Eaton Sales and Service Co. based 

in Colorado

 Bruce Larson, president of Oscar W. Larson Co. based in Michigan

 Archie Muckenfus, operations manager of Southern Pump and Tank Co. based in 

North Carolina

 Jerry Thomas, president of C.E. Thomas Co. based in California

 Bill White, president of White’s Pump Service and Supply, Inc. based in Texas

All interviews were conducted in June 2006.

Note:

In a May 31, 2006 telephone call with E2Inc., OUST’s subject matter expert for 

secondary containment, Paul Miller, instructed E2Inc. to include the cost of equipment in 

the estimate. Paul also clarified that, by “secondarily contained UST system,” the task 

order means double-walled tanks and double-walled piping, not a single-walled tank 

installed within an excavation liner

July 3, 2006 SC-03 – UST Cost Comparison 7

Appendix A: Variables That Would Aid In Cost Estimation

1. Size of tanks

2. Area of paving (tank slab, canopy slab, parking area?)

3. Depth and type of pavement (asphalt or concrete)

4. Type and number of dispensers

5. Type of tank monitoring system

6. Type of intercom

7. Type and number of point-of-sale (POS) systems

8. Type of excavation (rocky, sandy, high water table?)

9. Does the excavation necessitate shoring (sandy soil)?

10. Location of facility relative to installer and tank manufacturer (transportation 

costs, per diem for workers)

July 3, 2006 SC-03 – UST Cost Comparison 9

Appendix B: Installers’ Cost Estimates

Note: Blank rows indicate that the installer did not provide cost estimates for that type of 

UST system. Blank columns indicate that the installer did not provide a separate cost 

estimate for that specific equipment or installation component. For all installers, the 

total equipment cost includes three USTs, 300 feet of piping, four dispensers,2and a POS 

system. Most installers also included a tank monitoring system and intercom in the total 

equipment cost. For all installers, the total installation cost includes all elements of the 

installation.

 

2 Except for Eaton Sales and Service Co., whose total equipment cost is based on four to six dispensers.
July 3, 2006 SC-03 – UST Cost Comparison 10

Table B-1: Mean Itemized UST Equipment and Installation Costs.

3 USTs

Piping 

(300 

Feet)

4 DispensersPOS 

System

Tank 

Mon. 

System

Intercom TotalExcavation Tanks PipingDispensersAncillary Paving Total

Fiberglass

27,000 1,650 42,000 12,500 12,000 2,188 129,328 22,575 11,474 11,419 8,698 11,197 24,136 87,259 216,587

Flexible 

Plastic 27,000 6,000 42,000 12,500 12,000 2,188 124,219 23,750 9,750 8,750 6,375 10,500 23,125 79,625 203,844

Fiberglass

33,000 1,650 42,000 12,500 12,000 2,188 132,007 23,985 15,026 11,419 8,698 11,197 24,300 92,386 224,393

Flexible 

Plastic 33,000 6,000 42,000 12,500 12,000 2,188 127,344 23,750 11,000 8,750 6,375 10,500 23,125 80,875 208,219

Fiberglass

33,000 1,650 42,000 12,500 12,000 2,188 122,710 23,219 12,843 12,523 9,873 11,596 23,920 91,074 213,784

Flexible 

Plastic 33,000 6,000 42,000 12,500 12,000 2,188 112,292 25,000 11,000 9,000 7,167 10,750 22,500 81,833 194,125

Fiberglass

33,000 1,650 42,000 12,500 12,000 2,188 154,153 22,975 12,174 14,517 8,698 11,197 24,136 91,458 245,611

Flexible 

Plastic 33,000 6,000 42,000 12,500 12,000 2,188 147,619 24,250 10,625 10,250 6,375 10,500 23,125 82,500 230,119

Fiberglass

39,000 7,717 42,250 11,500 11,500 1,958 145,499 35,639 20,978 19,512 9,284 12,048 33,472 126,215 271,715

Flexible 

Plastic 39,000 9,167 42,250 11,500 11,500 1,958 135,979 37,417 21,300 17,500 7,833 11,800 34,217 124,550 260,529

Fiberglass

37,000 7,717 42,250 11,500 11,500 1,958 137,067 33,911 19,312 19,512 9,284 12,048 33,354 122,941 260,008

Flexible 

Plastic 37,000 9,167 42,250 11,500 11,500 1,958 130,063 36,583 19,500 17,500 7,833 11,800 34,217 122,217 252,279

Fiberglass

Clad 

Steel 

(ACT 

100)

Type of 

Piping

Steel 

w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Steel 

w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Fiberglass

Clad 

Steel 

(ACT 

100)

 Double-Walled Tank & Piping

 Single-Walled Tank & Piping

Total 

Cost

Type 

Of 

Tanks

Cost Of Equipment Cost Of Installation
July 3, 2006 SC-03 – UST Cost Comparison 11

Table B-2: Adams Tank and Lift, Inc. (Florida).

3 USTs

Piping 

(300 

Feet)

4 DispensersPOS 

System

Tank 

Mon. 

System

Intercom TotalExcavation Tanks PipingDispensersAncillary Paving Total

Fiberglass

Flexible 

Plastic

Fiberglass

Flexible 

Plastic

Fiberglass

Flexible 

Plastic

Fiberglass

Flexible 

Plastic

Fiberglass

37,500 10,500 48,000 10,000 11,000 1,500 118,500 70,000 60,000 35,000 5,000 10,000 52,800 232,800 351,300

Flexible 

Plastic 37,500 10,500 48,000 10,000 11,000 1,500 118,500 70,000 60,000 35,000 5,000 10,000 52,800 232,800 351,300

Fiberglass

40,500 10,500 48,000 10,000 11,000 1,500 121,500 65,000 55,000 35,000 5,000 10,000 52,800 222,800 344,300

Flexible 

Plastic 40,500 10,500 48,000 10,000 11,000 1,500 121,500 65,000 55,000 35,000 5,000 10,000 52,800 222,800 344,300

Type 

Of 

Tanks

Cost Of Equipment Cost Of Installation

Fiberglass

Clad 

Steel 

(ACT 

100)

Type of 

Piping

Steel 

w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Steel 

w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Fiberglass

Clad 

Steel 

(ACT 

100)

 Double-Walled Tank & Piping

 Single-Walled Tank & Piping

Total 

Cost
July 3, 2006 SC-03 – UST Cost Comparison 12

Table B-3: Eaton Sales and Service Co. (Colorado).

3 USTs

Piping 

(300 

Feet)

4 DispensersPOS 

System

Tank 

Mon. 

System

Intercom TotalExcavation Tanks PipingDispensersAncillary Paving Total

Fiberglass

13,500 1,375 123,875 40,000 13,000 14,000 12,500 11,500 25,000 116,000 239,875

Flexible 

Plastic 13,500 1,375 118,875 40,000 13,000 10,000 12,500 11,500 25,000 112,000 230,875

Fiberglass

13,500 1,375 139,875 40,000 18,000 14,000 12,500 11,500 25,000 121,000 260,875

Flexible 

Plastic 13,500 1,375 136,375 40,000 18,000 10,000 12,500 11,500 25,000 117,000 253,375

Fiberglass

13,500 1,375 123,875 40,000 13,000 14,000 12,500 11,500 25,000 116,000 239,875

Flexible 

Plastic 13,500 1,375 118,875 40,000 13,000 10,000 12,500 11,500 25,000 112,000 230,875

Fiberglass

13,500 1,375 148,375 40,000 13,000 14,000 12,500 11,500 25,000 116,000 264,375

Flexible 

Plastic 13,500 1,375 143,475 40,000 13,000 10,000 12,500 11,500 25,000 112,000 255,475

Fiberglass

13,500 1,375 164,875 40,000 18,000 14,000 12,500 11,500 25,000 121,000 285,875

Flexible 

Plastic 13,500 1,375 159,875 40,000 18,000 10,000 12,500 11,500 25,000 117,000 276,875

Fiberglass

13,500 1,375 133,575 40,000 13,000 14,000 12,500 11,500 25,000 116,000 249,575

Flexible 

Plastic 13,500 1,375 130,375 40,000 13,000 10,000 12,500 11,500 25,000 112,000 242,375

Note: The total equipment cost for this installer includes four to six dispensers.

Clad 

Steel 

(ACT 

100)

Type of 

Piping

Steel 

w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Steel 

w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Fiberglass

Clad 

Steel 

(ACT 

100)

 Double-Walled Tank & Piping

 Single-Walled Tank & Piping

Total 

Cost

Type 

Of 

Tanks

Cost Of Equipment Cost Of Installation

Fiberglass
July 3, 2006 SC-03 – UST Cost Comparison 13

Table B-4: Oscar W. Larson Co. (Michigan).

3 USTs

Piping 

(300 

Feet)

4 DispensersPOS 

System

Tank 

Mon. 

System

Intercom TotalExcavation Tanks PipingDispensersAncillary Paving Total

Fiberglass

48,000 15,000 127,000 20,000 15,000 20,000 5,000 10,000 20,000 90,000 217,000

Flexible 

Plastic 48,000 15,000 122,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 5,000 10,000 20,000 85,000 207,000

Fiberglass

48,000 15,000 118,000 20,000 15,000 20,000 5,000 10,000 20,000 90,000 208,000

Flexible 

Plastic 48,000 15,000 113,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 5,000 10,000 20,000 85,000 198,000

Fiberglass

48,000 15,000 124,000 20,000 15,000 20,000 5,000 10,000 20,000 90,000 214,000

Flexible 

Plastic 48,000 15,000 119,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 5,000 10,000 20,000 85,000 204,000

Fiberglass

48,000 15,000 167,000 22,000 18,000 25,000 5,000 10,000 20,000 100,000 267,000

Flexible 

Plastic 48,000 15,000 162,000 22,000 18,000 20,000 5,000 10,000 20,000 95,000 257,000

Fiberglass

48,000 15,000 159,000 22,000 17,000 25,000 5,000 10,000 20,000 99,000 258,000

Flexible 

Plastic 48,000 15,000 154,000 22,000 17,000 20,000 5,000 10,000 20,000 94,000 248,000

Fiberglass

48,000 15,000 162,000 22,000 18,000 25,000 5,000 10,000 20,000 100,000 262,000

Flexible 

Plastic 48,000 15,000 157,000 22,000 18,000 20,000 5,000 10,000 20,000 95,000 252,000

Cost Of Equipment Cost Of Installation

Fiberglass

Clad 

Steel 

(ACT 

100)

Type of 

Piping

Steel 

w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Steel 

w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Fiberglass

Clad 

Steel 

(ACT 

100)

 Double-Walled Tank & Piping

 Single-Walled Tank & Piping

Total 

Cost

Type 

Of 

Tanks
July 3, 2006 SC-03 – UST Cost Comparison 14

Table B-5: O'Day Equipment, Inc. (North Dakota).

3 USTs

Piping 

(300 

Feet)

4 DispensersPOS 

System

Tank 

Mon. 

System

Intercom TotalExcavation Tanks PipingDispensersAncillary Paving Total

Fiberglass

160,000 20,000 6,000 7,000 4,000 10,000 25,000 72,000 232,000

Flexible 

Plastic 163,000 20,000 6,000 8,000 4,000 10,000 25,000 73,000 236,000

Fiberglass

154,000 20,000 6,000 7,000 4,000 10,000 25,000 72,000 226,000

Flexible 

Plastic 161,000 20,000 6,000 8,000 4,000 10,000 25,000 73,000 234,000

Fiberglass

Flexible 

Plastic

Fiberglass

188,000 20,000 6,500 10,000 4,000 10,000 25,000 75,500 263,500

Flexible 

Plastic 186,000 20,000 6,500 9,000 4,000 10,000 25,000 74,500 260,500

Fiberglass

182,000 20,000 6,500 10,000 4,000 10,000 25,000 75,500 257,500

Flexible 

Plastic 180,000 20,000 6,500 9,000 4,000 10,000 25,000 74,500 254,500

Fiberglass

178,000 20,000 6,500 10,000 4,000 10,000 25,000 75,500 253,500

Flexible 

Plastic 177,000 20,000 6,500 9,000 4,000 10,000 25,000 74,500 251,500

 Single-Walled Tank & Piping

Total 

Cost

Type 

Of 

Tanks

Cost Of Equipment Cost Of Installation

Fiberglass

Clad 

Steel 

(ACT 

100)

Type of 

Piping

Steel 

w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Steel 

w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Fiberglass

Clad 

Steel 

(ACT 

100)

 Double-Walled Tank & Piping
July 3, 2006 SC-03 – UST Cost Comparison 15

Table B-6: Southern Pump and Tank Co. (North Carolina).

3 USTs

Piping 

(300 

Feet)

4 DispensersPOS 

System

Tank 

Mon. 

System

Intercom TotalExcavation Tanks PipingDispensersAncillary Paving Total

Fiberglass

27,000 1,650 36,000 9,000 12,000 3,000 88,650 15,000 5,000 10,000 4,000 22,500 56,500 145,150

Flexible 

Plastic 27,000 6,000 36,000 9,000 12,000 3,000 93,000 15,000 5,000 2,000 4,000 22,500 48,500 141,500

Fiberglass

33,000 1,650 36,000 9,000 12,000 3,000 94,650 15,000 5,000 10,000 4,000 22,500 56,500 151,150

Flexible 

Plastic 33,000 6,000 36,000 9,000 12,000 3,000 99,000 15,000 5,000 2,000 4,000 22,500 48,500 147,500

Fiberglass

33,000 1,650 36,000 9,000 12,000 3,000 94,650 15,000 5,000 10,000 4,000 22,500 56,500 151,150

Flexible 

Plastic 33,000 6,000 36,000 9,000 12,000 3,000 99,000 15,000 5,000 2,000 4,000 22,500 48,500 147,500

Fiberglass

33,000 1,650 36,000 9,000 12,000 3,000 94,650 15,000 5,000 10,000 4,000 22,500 56,500 151,150

Flexible 

Plastic 33,000 6,000 36,000 9,000 12,000 3,000 99,000 15,000 5,000 2,000 4,000 22,500 48,500 147,500

Fiberglass

39,000 1,650 36,000 9,000 12,000 3,000 100,650 15,000 5,000 10,000 4,000 22,500 56,500 157,150

Flexible 

Plastic 39,000 6,000 36,000 9,000 12,000 3,000 105,000 15,000 5,000 2,000 4,000 22,500 48,500 153,500

Fiberglass

33,000 1,650 36,000 9,000 12,000 3,000 94,650 15,000 5,000 10,000 4,000 22,500 56,500 151,150

Flexible 

Plastic 33,000 6,000 36,000 9,000 12,000 3,000 99,000 15,000 5,000 2,000 4,000 22,500 48,500 147,500

 Single-Walled Tank & Piping

Total 

Cost

Type 

Of 

Tanks

Cost Of Equipment Cost Of Installation

Fiberglass

Clad 

Steel 

(ACT 

100)

Type of 

Piping

Steel 

w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Steel 

w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Fiberglass

Clad 

Steel 

(ACT 

100)

 Double-Walled Tank & Piping
July 3, 2006 SC-03 – UST Cost Comparison 16

Table B-7: C. E. Thomas Co. (California).

3 USTs

Piping 

(300 

Feet)

4 DispensersPOS 

System

Tank 

Mon. 

System

Intercom TotalExcavation Tanks PipingDispensersAncillary Paving Total

Fiberglass

Flexible 

Plastic

Fiberglass

Flexible 

Plastic

Fiberglass

Flexible 

Plastic

Fiberglass

Flexible 

Plastic

Fiberglass

40,500 11,000 37,000 10,000 98,500 57,500 29,000 16,500 17,500 60,000 180,500 279,000

Flexible 

Plastic 40,500 11,000 37,000 10,000 98,500 57,500 29,000 16,500 17,500 60,000 180,500 279,000

Fiberglass

37,500 11,000 37,000 10,000 95,500 57,500 29,000 16,500 17,500 60,000 180,500 276,000

Flexible 

Plastic 37,500 11,000 37,000 10,000 95,500 57,500 29,000 16,500 17,500 60,000 180,500 276,000

Fiberglass

Clad 

Steel 

(ACT 

100)

Type of 

Piping

Steel 

w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Steel 

w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Fiberglass

Clad 

Steel 

(ACT 

100)

 Double-Walled Tank & Piping

 Single-Walled Tank & Piping

Total 

Cost

Type 

Of 

Tanks

Cost Of Equipment Cost Of Installation
July 3, 2006 SC-03 – UST Cost Comparison 17

Table B-8: White's Pump Service and Supply, Inc. (Texas).

3 USTs

Piping 

(300 

Feet)

4 DispensersPOS 

System

Tank 

Mon. 

System

Intercom TotalExcavation Tanks PipingDispensersAncillary Paving Total

Fiberglass

147,114 17,875 18,370 6,093 17,991 13,288 28,180 101,797 248,911

Flexible 

Plastic

Fiberglass

153,508 24,927 31,130 6,093 17,991 13,288 29,002 122,431 275,939

Flexible 

Plastic

Fiberglass

148,314 17,875 18,370 6,093 17,991 13,288 28,180 101,797 250,111

Flexible 

Plastic

Fiberglass

172,741 17,875 18,370 13,584 17,991 13,288 28,180 109,288 282,029

Flexible 

Plastic

Fiberglass

194,971 24,972 19,370 13,584 17,991 13,288 29,002 118,207 313,178

Flexible 

Plastic

Fiberglass

174,241 17,875 18,370 13,584 17,991 13,288 28,180 109,288 283,529

Flexible 

Plastic

Type 

Of 

Tanks

Cost Of Equipment Cost Of Installation

Fiberglass

Clad 

Steel 

(ACT 

100)

Type of 

Piping

Steel 

w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Steel 

w/CP 

(sti-P3)

Fiberglass

Clad 

Steel 

(ACT 

100)

 Double-Walled Tank & Piping

 Single-Walled Tank & Piping

Total 

Cost