alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 37.137 Paratransit plan development. ( a ) *Survey of existing services.* Each submitting entity shall survey the area to be covered by the plan to identify any person or entity (public or private) which provides a paratransit or other special transportation service for ADA paratransit eligible individuals in the service area to which the plan applies.
( b ) *Public participation.* Each submitting entity shall ensure public participation in the development of its paratransit plan, including at least the following: ( 1 ) *Outreach.* Each submitting entity shall solicit participation in the development of its plan by the widest range of persons anticipated to use its paratransit service. Each entity shall develop contacts, mailing lists and other appropriate means for notification of opportunities to participate in the development of the paratransit plan;
( 2 ) *Consultation with individuals with disabilities.* Each entity shall contact individuals with disabilities and groups representing them in the community. Consultation shall begin at an early stage in the plan development and should involve persons with disabilities in all phases of plan development. All documents and other information concerning the planning procedure and the provision of service shall be available, upon request, to members of the public, except where disclosure would be an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;
( 3 ) *Opportunity for public comment.* The submitting entity shall make its plan available for review before the plan is finalized. In making the plan available for public review, the entity shall ensure that the plan is available upon request in accessible formats;
( 4 ) *Public hearing.* The entity shall sponsor at a minimum one public hearing and shall provide adequate notice of the hearing, including advertisement in appropriate media, such as newspapers of general and special interest circulation and radio announcements; and
( 5 ) *Special requirements.* If the entity intends to phase-in its paratransit service over a multi-year period, or request a waiver based on undue financial burden, the public hearing shall afford the opportunity for interested citizens to express their views concerning the phase-in, the request, and which service criteria may be delayed in implementation.
( c ) *Ongoing requirement.* The entity shall create an ongoing mechanism for the participation of individuals with disabilities in the continued development and assessment of services to persons with disabilities. This includes, but is not limited to, the development of the initial plan, any request for an undue financial burden waiver, and each annual submission.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 19, 2017

No. 0 4

- 17

- 00148

- CR

Benjamin POEHLMANN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR10018

Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant's Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED.

The Appellant's Brief is due August 16, 2017.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

I N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of July, 2017

.

___________________________________ Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Cl erk
Docket: CMS-2009-0040 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: CMS-2009-0040-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: CMS-2009-0040-0012 

NH-John Keusch 

Submitter Information 

Name: John Keusch 

Address: 

Concord, NH, 03301 

General Comment 

I am a severe mental health patient presenting this comment for thought and 

support through issues extremely disturbing to me that two totally different 

diseases of Mental Health and Addition are constantly "lumped together" with just 

a single digit code number denoting the difference in the diagnosis. As a society 

constantly in crisis, it is a known factor that both diseases are frowned upon and 

carry many negative condentations. If you have a mental health issue, you are 

referred to as a retard,have bats in the belfry, menace to society, and one of my 

personal favorites, a BUM. If you are unlucky enough to be an addict, again the 

same descriptions fit. 

We must educate the masses and raise the awarness level that these are 

diseases, not something that were designed and implemented for sympathy, great 

financial gain, or "a free ride"in society. 

We did not choose to inherit these demoralizing and destructive deficits. Most 

Addicts have mental health illnesses, but all mental health patients are not 

addicts. We struggle through each and everyday making gallant attempts to join 

or rejoin the Main-stream American way of life. 

Our diseases need to be viewed as life and death struggles of which not one 

single person should have to endure the burden of. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 12, 2009 

Received: May 07, 2009 

Status: Posted 

Posted: May 11, 2009 

Category: Individual - I0001 

Tracking No. 8097ce15 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web
Perhaps if these two totally different diseases were viewed and addressed by our 

government differently, than maybe the black cloud or ignorance and 

prejudgement would be lifted. 

If, as a society, we would invest in more research for a deeper more meaningful 

and educated avenue by simply communicating with us, you would find out that 

we are everyday people just like you. Please don't judge us by our diseases, get 

to know us as people, friends, and neighbors. 

Remember, as a society we don't judge the child in a wheel chair, the bed ridden 

women that can't breathe, or people affected by numerous other diseases, that 

are extremely debilitating. 

Although mental health patients and addicts illnesses cannot be seen, touched, 

or fixed with a band-aid, believe,me they do exhist.
y2

se
rT Moody st Woon Biv, Sue 10 « Heston 17908

NATIONAL COMPANIES: Phone: 713-977-7500 » Fax: 713-977-7505 * moodynational.com

Mr. Fred Wong

Office of Regulations and Interpretations
Employee Benefits Security Administration
Attn: Conflict of Interest Rule, Room N-5655
Attn: D-11712

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20210

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Tam writing on behalf of Moody National REIT Sponsor, LLC (“Moody”) to request a 45-day
extension of the comment periods for (1) the proposed rule entitled “Definition of the Term ‘Fiduciary’;
Conflict of Interest Rule - Retirement Investment Advice” (RIN: 1210-AB32), (2) the proposed class
exemption entitled “Proposed Best Interest Contract Exemption” (ZRIN: 1210-ZA25), and (3) the related
proposed and amended prohibited transactions exemptions that were issued by the U.S. Department of
Labor (the “DOL”) and published in the Federal Register on April 20, 2015. Moody is the sponsor of
Moody National REIT I, Inc. and Moody National REIT II, Inc. (together, the “Moody Companies”),
which are real estate investment trusts that invest in diversified portfolios of real estate properties, real
estate securities and debt related investments with a primary focus on hotel properties.

The regulations defining a fiduciary have not been updated since they were originally issued in
1975, However, these regulations have been the subject of much debate. On October 22, 2010, the DOL
published a proposed rule regarding the definition of the term “fiduciary,” and this proposal, along with a
subsequent hearing, generated in excess of 350 comment letters. The comment period for the rule
proposed in 2010 was extended from its initial duration and ultimately did not terminate until February 3,
2011, 104 days after its publication:

As the DOL accurately stated in the executive summary of the rule proposed on April 20, 2015,
the changes contemplated by the DOL represent a “broad regulatory package.” We believe that an
extension of the comment periods is necessary to analyze the full scope of this broad package and to make
comments based on a comprehensive view of the current marketplace and regulatory regime. Thank you
for your consideration of this request.

Sincerely,

fL—

Brett C. Moody
Chief Executive Officer

ec: . Rosemarie A. Thurston, Alston & Bird LLP

LEGAL02/35531574v2
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, November 7, 1995 (141), Para 141.35 Recess--9:40 P.M.]
[Page 1879]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.141.35  recess--9:40 p.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BUNN, pursuant to clause 12 of rule I, 
declared the House in recess at 9 o'clock and 40 minutes p.m., subject 
to the call of the Chair.
```
H. Res. 214

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 31, 2001.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2505) to amend title

18, United States Code, to prohibit human cloning. The bill

shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendments

recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed

in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended,

and on any further amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the

bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the

Judiciary; (2) the further amendment printed in the report

of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if

offered by Representative Scott of Virginia or his designee,

which shall be separately debatable for 10 minutes equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; (3)

after disposition of the amendment by Representative Scott,
2

•HRES 214 EH

the further amendment in the nature of a substitute printed

in the report of the Committee on Rules, if offered by Representative Greenwood of Pennsylvania or his designee, shall

be in order without intervention of any point of order, shall

be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for

one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and

an opponent; and (4) one motion to recommit with or without

instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1167.html[7/22/2015 3:04:59 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-h9ih

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1167

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: chris hargrove

General Comment

the government has all ready done the citizens of this country a great injustice by makeing drugs illegal by

 legallizeing illegal aliens who are here illegally starting the affordable care act which has produced the exact

 opposite effect makeing insurance more unaffordable the government officials who have stood by these laws

 have corrupted thhis great nation and messing with citizens retirement funds should be an ilegal action which

 should cause any government official a criminal and incarcerated for breaking the trust and the law
#### John J. Fox, Respondent, *v.*Frederick H. Cox, Appellant, and Harriet Reilly, Respondent, Impleaded with Others.

(Submitted April 24, 1911;

decided May 2, 1911.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 201 N. Y. 189.)
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1416.html[7/23/2015 9:42:01 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvn-f24v

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1416

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Glenn Jones

General Comment

I worked all my life for my retirement and savings. I will not allow some dipped brainless congress men to tell

 me how to manage or control my life savings just to please some liberal idiot(s) or so they can have acess to MY

 MONEY. Hell no.
###### Editorial Note on Part 195

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.300 Scope.

This subpart prescribes minimum requirements for the pressure testing of steel pipelines. However, this subpart does not apply to the movement of pipe under § 195.424.

[Amdt. 195-51, 59 FR 29384, June 7, 1994]
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.77 
 Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation 
 We pay each of our non-employee directors an annual retainer, attendance fees and a committee chair retainer (if applicable). The annual retainer is $50,000 per year, payable quarterly. The attendance fees are $2,000
per Board meeting, plus $1,500 for each regularly scheduled committee meeting attended, payable quarterly. The Chairman receives an additional annual retainer of $75,000, payable quarterly. The committee chairs for the Audit and Finance Committee
and Compensation and Management Development Committee each receive an annual committee chair retainer of $20,000, payable quarterly. The chair of the Governance, Nominating and Social Responsibility Committee receives an annual committee chair
retainer of $10,000, payable quarterly. Employee directors are not eligible for the annual retainer or attendance fees, and are not eligible to serve as committee chairs. 
 Our Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan, which allowed each non-employee director to elect to forego receipt of his or her retainer and fees, was suspended in January 2005 and then terminated in September
2005. No options were granted under the Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan in 2005. 
 Under our 1996 Stock Option and Award
Plan, non-employee directors are eligible to receive stock options according to a pre-determined formula, as follows: (i) each new non-employee director automatically receives an option to purchase 15,000 shares at the then-current fair market
value; and (ii) each continuing non-employee director automatically receives, on an annual basis, an option to purchase additional shares at the then-current fair market value. In fiscal 2004, the annual grant was for 3,750 shares. Effective
for fiscal 2005, the Board increased the number of shares to 7,500 to ensure competitive director compensation. All initial options to new non-employee directors are granted on the date of appointment to the Board. All continuing non-employee
director options are granted on the first business day after each Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The options normally become exercisable three years after the date of grant. Employee directors are not eligible for these options and
Mrs. Fisher, although eligible as a non-employee director, has elected not to receive stock options. The Compensation and Management Development Committee is also authorized to grant discretionary options to non-employee directors. No
discretionary grants were made in fiscal 2003, 2004 or 2005.
From: Mike Masiello [mailto:mike@masielloretirement.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 1:48 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Cc: Mike Masiello

Subject: RIN1210-AB32

I would ask you to please extend the comment period to 120 days, that is at miniumum the time needed 

to properly understand the important issues. Thank you

Michael A. Masiello

Masiello Retirement Solutions

1081 Long Pond Rd., Ste. 140

Rochester, NY 14626

585-720-0590

585-720-0592 (Fax)

www.masielloretirement.com

Registered representative of and securities and Advisory Services offered through Cetera Advisors LLC, Member 

FINRA, SIPC

Cetera is under separate ownership from any other entity.

Note: 

For Business emails use - mike@masielloretirement.com

For Personal emails use - mmasiello@choiceonemail.com

Confidential: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the 

use of the individual or entity to whom this email is addressed. If you are not one of the named 

recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please 

notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, 

dissemination, forward, printing, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0715 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. JOSHUA RODNEY MEECH,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 2, 2024 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 26 2023

12/26/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0715
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Todd B. Barnum, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Max & Erma’s Restaurants,Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
22

 
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.       Date: September 13, 2006
EXHIBIT
      32.2





**Certification
      Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.** § **1350)**




The
      undersigned, as the chief financial officer of PAB Bankshares, Inc., certifies,
      to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
      period ended September 30, 2006, which accompanies this certification fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      PAB
      Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing
      certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other
      purpose.





Dated
      this 9th day of November, 2006.





*/s/
                Donald J. Torbert, Jr.*Donald
                J. Torbert, Jr.Executive
                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      PAB Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by PAB Bankshares, Inc. and furnished
      to the SEC or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 11


                           MERRIMAC INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                       ---------------------------------
                                  (Unaudited)
                                  -----------

                                                        Quarter     Nine Months
                                                      -------------------------
                                                       Ended September 30, 2000
                                                      -------------------------


Numerator:
Net income available to common shareholders...........  $ 219,144     $  94,462
                                                        =========     =========

Basic earnings per share
------------------------
Weighted average number of shares outstanding for
basic net income per share
Common stock..........................................  2,186,015     2,021,057
                                                        =========     =========
Net income per common share - basic...................      $ .10         $ .05
                                                            =====         =====

Diluted earnings per share
--------------------------
Weighted average number of shares outstanding for
diluted net income per share
Common stock .........................................  2,186,015     2,021,057
Effect of dilutive securities - stock options (1) ....    193,013       150,257
                                                        ---------     ---------
Weighted average number of shares outstanding for
diluted net income per share..........................  2,379,028     2,171,314
                                                        =========     =========
Net income per common share - diluted.................      $ .09         $ .04
                                                            =====         =====


(1) Represents additional shares resulting from assumed conversion of
      stock options less shares purchased with the proceeds therefrom.
#### § 238.715 Roof and side structure integrity.

To demonstrate roof and side structure integrity, Tier III trainsets shall comply with the requirements in §§ 238.215 and 238.217.