alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 49285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4196]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Clinical Center; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Board of Scientific Counselors of the NIH Clinical Center.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the Clinical 
Center, including consideration of personnel qualifications and 
performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the 
disclosure of which constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors of the NIH 
Clinical Center.
    Date: September 24-25, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the Critical Care Medicine 
Program.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 10, 10 Center 
Drive, CRC Room 4-2551, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: David K. Henderson, MD, Deputy Director for 
Clinical Care, Office of the Director, Clinical Center, National 
Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 6-1480, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 496-3515.

    Dated: August 20, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-4196 Filed 8-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: vtaylor@millermartin.com [mailto:vtaylor@millermartin.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:11 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Victoria Taylor 

202 W. Cherokee St. 

Lafayette, GA 30728
#### § 236.726 Circuit, track.

An electrical circuit of which the rails of the track form a part.
From: Bob [mailto:urrobo@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 3:46 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

I am almost 80 years old and have been trading my self directed IRA for approximately 30 years since I 

retired in the 80’s due to . My IRA was never large to start with since IRA’s 

were not available in most of my working life, 

My wife and I are now living a lower middle class life compared to the middle class life we led until about 

10 years ago. If we had to pay for a fiduciary advisor to make our choices for us

we would have less assets to live on, therefore please don’t consider any control of our way living. 

Government regulations are not the answer, if U think people are being taken advantage of by advisors or 

stock brokers let the SEC or other Government Agencies look into specific cases and make examples of 

them. Regulations are just another expense for every one including the Gov’t.

Thanks for your consideration.

Robert Allen

Punta Gorda, FL
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-213-CV

SHEZAD MALIK APPELLANT

V.

THOMAS SLONE AND APPELLEES

MICHAEL MEYER

------------

FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Appellant Shezad Malik attempts to appeal from the trial court’s May 22,

2009 interlocutory order, which granted the Appellees’ motion to disqualify

him. On July 24, 2009, we sent Malik a letter stating our concern that we may

have no jurisdiction over this appeal because the order does not appear to be

a final appealable order or judgment, nor does it appear to be an appealable

interlocutory order. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)
2... Malik, in his response, requests a writ of mandamus. Because his

response does not comply with the requisites for a petition for writ of

mandamus, we have sent a noncompliance letter. Should Malik file a compliant

petition for writ of mandamus, that petition will be filed in a separate cause

number. This opinion addresses and finally disposes of the interlocutory appeal

only.

2

(Vernon 2008) (listing appealable interlocutory orders); Lehmann v. Har-Con

Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (providing general rule that an appeal

may be taken only from a final judgment). We indicated that this court would

dismiss this appeal if we did not receive a response showing grounds for

continuing the appeal by August 3, 2009. Malik filed a timely response,

acknowledging that there is no interlocutory appeal available from the May 22,

2009 interlocutory order disposing of the disqualification motion.

Accordingly, because the order is neither a final judgment nor an

appealable interlocutory order, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.2

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

SUE WALKER

JUSTICE

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 20, 2009
§ 211.7 Filing requirements. ( a ) Any person may petition the Administrator for issuance, amendment, repeal or permanent or temporary waiver of any rule or regulation. A petition for waiver must be submitted at least 3 months before the proposed effective date, unless good cause is shown for not doing so.
( b ) ( 1 ) All petitions and applications subject to this part, including applications for special approval under §§ 211.55 and 238.21 of this chapter, petitions for grandfathering approval under § 238.203 of this chapter, and signal applications under parts 235 and 236 of this chapter, shall be submitted to the FRA Docket Clerk. Each petition received shall be acknowledged in writing. The acknowledgment shall contain the docket number assigned to the petition or application and state the date the petition or application was received. Within 60 days following receipt, FRA will advise the petitioner or applicant of any deficiencies in its petition or application.
( 2 ) All comments submitted in response to a notice and other material pertaining to proceedings subject to this part, including comments submitted in response to requests for special approval under § 211.55 and § 238.21 of this chapter, petitions for grandfathering approval under § 238.203 of this chapter, and signal applications under parts 235 and 236 of this chapter, shall be submitted to the Federal Docket Management System and shall contain the assigned docket number for that proceeding. The form of such submissions may be in written or electronic form consistent with the standards and requirements established by the Federal Docket Management System and posted on its web site at *http://www.regulations.gov .*
[64 FR 70195, Dec. 16, 1999, as amended at 74 FR 25171, 25172, May 27, 2009]
#### §§ 28.104-28.109 [Reserved]
§ 241.11 Prohibition against conducting a railroad operation dispatched by an extraterritorial dispatcher; exceptions. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in § 241.5(d) or paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, a railroad subject to this part shall not conduct, or contract for the conduct of, a railroad operation in the United States that is dispatched from a location outside of the United States.
( b ) *Transitional period to continue existing extraterritorial dispatching.* A railroad that has normally conducted, or contracted for the conduct of, a railroad operation in the United States that is extraterritorially dispatched pursuant to the regulations contained in 49 CFR part 241, revised as of October 1, 2002, may continue to conduct or contract for the conduct of the operation until April 10, 2003, to permit the railroad an opportunity to file a waiver request pursuant to § 241.7.
( c ) *Emergencies.* ( 1 ) In an emergency situation, a railroad may conduct, or contract for the conduct of, a railroad operation in the United States that is dispatched from a location outside the United States, provided that: ( i ) The dispatching railroad notifies the FRA Regional Administrator of each FRA region where the railroad operation was conducted, in writing as soon as practicable, of the emergency; and
( ii ) The extraterritorial dispatching is limited to the duration of the emergency.
( 2 ) Written notification may be made either on paper or by electronic mail.
( 3 ) A list of the States that make up the FRA regions and the street and e-mail addresses and fax numbers of the FRA Regional Administrators appears in appendix C to this part.
( d ) *Liability.* The Administrator may hold either the railroad that conducts the railroad operation or the railroad contractor that conducts the operation, or both, responsible for compliance with this section and subject to civil penalties under § 241.15.
§ 20.200 Agency and legislative liaison. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 20.100 (a), does not apply in the case of a payment of reasonable compensation made to an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement if the payment is for agency and legislative liaison activities not directly related to a covered Federal action.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, providing any information specifically requested by an agency or Congress is allowable at any time.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following agency and legislative liaison activities are allowable at any time only where they are not related to a specific solicitation for any covered Federal action: ( 1 ) Discussing with an agency (including individual demonstrations) the qualities and characteristics of the person's products or services, conditions or terms of sale, and service capabilities; and,
( 2 ) Technical discussions and other activities regarding the application or adaptation of the person's products or services for an agency's use.
( d ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following agencies and legislative liaison activities are allowable only where they are prior to formal solicitation of any covered Federal action: ( 1 ) Providing any information not specifically requested but necessary for an agency to make an informed decision about initiation of a covered Federal action;
( 2 ) Technical discussions regarding the preparation of an unsolicited proposal prior to its official submission; and,
( 3 ) Capability presentations by persons seeking awards from an agency pursuant to the provisions of the Small Business Act, as amended by Public Law 95-507 and other subsequent amendments.
( e ) Only those activities expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
Editorial Note on Part 325
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 325 appear at 66 FR 49869, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 325.39 Measurement procedure; highway operations. ( a ) In accordance with the rules in this subpart, a measurement shall be made of the sound level generated by a motor vehicle operating through the measurement area on the traveled lane of the highway within the test site, regardless of the highway grade, load, acceleration or deceleration.
( b ) The sound level generated by the motor vehicle is the highest reading observed on the sound level measurement system as the vehicle passes through the measurement area, corrected, when appropriate, in accordance with the rules in subpart F of this part. (Table 1 in § 325.7 lists the range of maximum permissible sound level readings for various test conditions.) The sound level of the vehicle being measured must be observed to rise at least 6 dB(A) before the maximum sound level occurs and to fall at least 6 dB(A) after the maximum sound level occurs in order to be considered a valid sound level reading.
[40 FR 42437, Sept. 12, 1975, as amended at 41 FR 10227, Mar. 10, 1976]
§ 366.4T Required States. ( a ) *Motor carriers.* Every motor carrier (of property or passengers) shall make a designation for each State in which it is authorized to operate and for each State traversed during such operations. Every motor carrier (including private carriers) operating in the United States in the course of transportation between points in a foreign country shall file a designation for each State traversed.
( b ) *Brokers.* Every broker shall make a designation for each State in which its offices are located or in which contracts will be written.
[82 FR 5303, Jan. 17, 2017]
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/18/15 9:09 PM

Received: July 17, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k10-9sly

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2510

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

After we have worked a lifetime of 45 or plus years - the government should have no control 

over the money we have worked for and 

the retirement money we have put into. If Mr. Obama wants his hands in it or any government 

official - I believe we should be able to do the

the same to his or theirs. It's bad enough that the GOVERNMENT has taken money from social 

security funds and spent

some of what they ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO !!! I feel sorry for the children of today - the 

United States is no longer the wondrous country

it once was and was to remain ! We have no work for our people as it was all outsourced for the 

almighty profit dollar. We have more people on

welfare due to the lack of formidable work. Our magnificent country has done such a downhill 

slide due to BIG BUSINESS

going elsewhere. We have prison guards in Tennessee trying to make a living on $12.50 an hour 

!!! YET - we have someone who can

throw a ball into a hoop earning MILLIONS of dollars _ FOR WHAT ?????????? THERE is 

something very wrong in this

country. We have illegal aliens who now will be able to draw on the social security that I and 

others have worked all our lives
for !?! I am all for being helpful but the politicians in Washington DC need to come out of their 

protected little shells and see

what THERI decisions have done to this country. Maybe they need to go work in a coal min or a 

power plant or a prison where a "shank"

could be thrust into them at any time and try to go home and feed their family and clothe them on 

$12.50 an hour ! And why

is it that after their term in a political office they still maintain a six figure retirement salary ?
#### § 29.905 To whom does a Tribe appeal a pre-award decision?

A Tribe appeals a pre-award decision in accordance with the process in § 29.907 to a hearing official who was not involved in the initial decision and is appointed by the General Counsel of the Department.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 OMEGA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Daniel L. WarfelDaniel L. WarfelChief Financial OfficerDate: August 2, 2005
  Page 29
IB

Union Calendar No. 141

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2259

[Report No. 104–272]

To disapprove certain sentencing guideline amendments.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 6, 1995

Mr. MCCOLLUM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 29, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To disapprove certain sentencing guideline amendments.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2259 RH

1 SECTION 1. DISAPPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS RELATING TO

2 EQUALIZATION OF CRACK AND COCAINE

3 POWDER QUANTITIES FOR TRAFFICKING OF4 FENSES.

5 In accordance with section 994(p) of title 28, United

6 States Code, Amendment number 5 of the ‘‘Amendments

7 to the Sentencing Guidelines, Policy Statements, and Offi8 cial Commentary’’, submitted by the United States Sen9 tencing Commission to Congress on May 1, 1995, is here10 by disapproved and shall not take effect to the extent it—

11 (1) amends § 2D1.1(c) (1) through (14) of the

12 sentencing guidelines;

13 (2) inserts the following sentence in § 2D1.1(c)

14 of the sentencing guidelines: ‘‘ ‘Cocaine,’ for the

15 purposes of this guideline, includes cocaine hydro16 chloride, cocaine base, and crack cocaine.’’; and

17 (3) deletes ‘‘1 gm of Cocaine Base (‘Crack’) =

18 20 kg of marihuana’’ from the Commentary to

19 § 2D1.1 of the sentencing guidelines captioned ‘‘Ap20 plication Notes’’ in Note 10 in the subdivision cap21 tioned ‘‘Cocaine and Other Schedule I and II Stimu22 lants’’.
3

•HR 2259 RH

1 SEC. 2. DISAPPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS RELATING TO

2 EQUALIZATION OF CRACK AND COCAINE

3 POWER QUANTITIES FOR POSSESSION OF4 FENSES.

5 In accordance with section 994(p) of title 28, United

6 States Code, Amendment number 5 of the ‘‘Amendments

7 to the Sentencing Guidelines, Policy Statements, and Offi8 cial Commentary’’, submitted by the United States Sen9 tencing Commission to Congress on May 1, 1995, is here10 by disapproved and shall not take effect to the extent it

11 amends section 2D2.1.

12 SEC. 3. DISAPPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS RELATING TO

13 MONEY LAUNDERING AND TRANSACTIONS IN

14 PROPERTY DERIVED FROM UNLAWFUL AC15 TIVITY.

16 In accordance with section 994(p) of title 28, United

17 States Code, Amendment number 18 of the ‘‘Amendments

18 to the Sentencing Guidelines, Policy Statements, and Offi19 cial Commentary’’, submitted by the United States Sen20 tencing Commission to Congress on May 1, 1995, is here21 by disapproved and shall not take effect.
Union Calendar No. 141

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H.R. 2259

[Report No. 104–272]

A BILL

To disapprove certain sentencing guideline

amendments.

SEPTEMBER 29, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, September 25, 1995 (120), Para 120.7 Time Limitation of Referred Bill]
[Page 1451]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.120.7  time limitation of referred bill

  Pursuant to clause 5 of rule X the following action was taken by the 
Speaker:

       H.R. 1816. Referral to the Committee on Commerce extended 
     for a period ending not later than September 29, 1995.
```
# EUR-Lex - 52004AP0019 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52004AP0019

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2702/ 1999 on measures to provide information on, and to promote, agricultural products in third countries, and Council Regulation (EC) No 2826/ 2000 on information and promotion actions for agricultural products on the internal market (COM(2004)0233 — 11464/ 2004 — C6- 0008/2004 — 2004/ 0073(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 166 E , 07/07/2005 P. 0055 - 0056 *

P6_TA(2004)0019

Information and promotion measures for agricultural products *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2702/1999 on measures to provide information on, and to promote, agricultural products in third countries, and Council Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000 on information and promotion actions for agricultural products on the internal market (COM(2004)0233 — 11464/2004 — C6-0008/2004 — 2004/0073(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2004)0233) [1],

- having regard to the amended Council proposal (11464/2004),

- having regard to Articles 36 and 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0008/2004),

- having regard to Rules 51 and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture (A6-0008/2004),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended by the Council;

2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

3. Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

4. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
exv10w5



 






EXHIBIT 10.5




JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.

NOTICE OF GRANT OF RESTRICTED STOCK



The Participant has been granted an award (the "Award") pursuant to the JDA Software Group,
Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan (the "Plan") of certain shares of Stock (the "Shares"), as
follows:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Participant:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Date of Grant:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Total Number of Shares:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 





	 	 	 	 	 
	Vested Shares:	 	Except as provided in the Restricted Stock
Agreement, the number of Vested Shares
(disregarding any resulting fractional share)
as of any date is determined by multiplying
the Total Number of Shares by the "Vested
Ratio” determined as of such date as follows:
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Vested Ratio
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	On Date of Grant
	 	1/2
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Plus	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	For each additional full
month of the Participant’s
continuous Service from the
Date of Grant until the
Vested Ratio equals 1/1, an
additional
	 	1/48





By their signatures below or by electronic acceptance or authentication in a form authorized by the
Company, the Company and the Participant agree that the Award is governed by this Grant Notice and
by the provisions of the Plan and the Restricted Stock Agreement, both of which are made part of
this document. The Participant acknowledges that copies of the Plan, Restricted Stock Agreement
and the prospectus for the Plan are available on the Company’s internal web site and may be viewed
and printed by the Participant for attachment to the Participant’s copy of this Grant Notice. The
Participant represents that the Participant has read and is familiar with the provisions of the
Plan and the Restricted Stock Agreement, and hereby accepts the Award subject to all of their terms
and conditions.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.	 	 	 	PARTICIPANT	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Signature	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Its:
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Date	 	 
	Address:	 	14400 N. 87th Street	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Scottsdale, AZ 85260
	 	 	 	Address	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 






			
	ATTACHMENTS:	 	2005 Performance Incentive Plan, as amended to the Date of Grant; Restricted Stock
Agreement; Assignment Separate from Certificate, Section 83(b) election memorandum and sample
forms, and Plan Prospectus