alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 22.11 Eligibility criteria. ( a ) *Eligible Borrower.* To be eligible to apply for a STLP loan guarantee, a borrower must meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) Be a for-profit entity;
( 2 ) Have an eligible transportation-related contract;
( 3 ) Demonstrate an eligible use for the desired credit;
( 4 ) Be an established business with experience in the transportation industry and trade for which the STLP loan is sought;
( 5 ) Be certified as a DBE or have another eligible certification issued by the SBA; and
( 6 ) Be current on all federal, state, and local tax liabilities.
( b ) *Eligible Transportation-Related Contract.* Any fully-executed transportation-related contract, subcontract, or purchase order held directly with DOT or with grantees and recipients receiving federal funding from DOT for the maintenance, rehabilitation, restructuring, improvement or revitalization of any of the nation's modes of transportation shall be considered an eligible contract.
( c ) *Eligibility Period.* A borrower is eligible for participation in the STLP for a period up to a total of five (5) years. The STLP renewal is not automatic. The borrower has to demonstrate its continued eligibility and creditworthiness for STLP and must submit a complete application package. ( 1 ) The continued eligibility of any borrower who would exceed the period limit in paragraph (c) of this section will be determined on a case-by-case basis by the OSDBU Director and is subject to the following provisions: ( i ) The STLP loan guarantee may be reduced; and
( ii ) The STLP loan interest rate may be increased.
( 2 ) Should any borrower currently in the STLP become ineligible per paragraph (a) of this section during the term of a STLP loan, the failure to comply with a specific requirement must be brought to the immediate attention of all remaining parties.
( 3 ) Borrower ineligibility may result in a termination of the current guarantee.
Page I o t* 2 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

Docket: IRS-ZOI,9-0008 

Request for Inibrmatiun for Paul Wcllstone md Pcte Donlenici Mental Hcalth Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: I.R3:20!)1-1-0008&(Q! 

Request for Infnrmation Regarding the Paul Wcllstone and Pelt: Domenici Mental Hcalth Parity 

and Addiction Equity Act of 3.008 

Document: IRS-2009rQ(lC18-1)02J 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-09629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Jay J. M~ssina 

Address: 

Wrestfield, NJ, 

Organization: Behavioral Scimcc Associates 

General Comment 

Cornrnents regarding Regulatory Guidancc U SCG -2007-27022 

page 191 57, I1 B sp~ifi~: Neas 1 mind 4 

1 am a clinical psychologist who provides EhG biofcdback treatment to 

u~dividuals with A ttcntion Deficit Hyperactivity Disordct. and Mand Disorders. EEG 

biofeedback is an empirically validated and widely recognized effective non 

lnedicaticln treatment fir ADHD. ae well as other conditions. Thcre are over 50 

studies evaluating the eft'nclivcr~ess of BEG biofcdback in the Ircatrnent of 

ADHD. Substance Use disorders and Autism. . A reccnt review of this literature 

concluded "EEG biofedback meets the Anlerican Acadcrny of Child and 

Adolescent Psy~hiatry criteria for" Clinical Guidelines "for treatment of ADHD." 

This rncarls that EEG bio fcedhack meets thc same criteria as lo medication fur 

treating AUHD, and that EEG hiofeedba~k "sl~ou!d always be considered as an 

intervention f'ur this disorder by the clinician". 

This service has heen denied by Gcot.gia Medicaid, Actna, ISnitd Behavioral 

Health, Blue Cross. Cigna, and Ameripup. 

This is limitation of an effcctivc and validated trcatma~t for a mmtal hedth 

problem. The reasons given by the i~lsurance campanics for this dcnial fell into 

two categories: I j our company does not cover bioftedhack for Mc~lral Health 

problems or 2) there is not yct sufficient evidmcc for the efficacy of k;EG 

bjcrfc.dback. As such, they are using e~~idmvc-hasd criteria that are far more 

restrictivz fir mental health s~rvices than the critcria which are used for
#### § 232.301 Scope.

This subpart contains the periodic brake system maintenance and testing requirements for equipment used in freight and other non-passenger trains.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 17, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50172 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS ELIER GALLEGOS-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-2024-ALL

-------------------- Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jesus Elier Gallergos-Garcia raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### § 37.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to implement the transportation and related provisions of titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
# EUR-Lex - 52004IG0124(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52004IG0124(01)

**Initiative of the United Kingdom with a view to the adoption of a Council Decision amending Decision 2000/820/JHA establishing a European Police College (CEPOL) **

*
Official Journal C 020 , 24/01/2004 P. 0018 - 0018 *

Initiative of the United Kingdom with a view to the adoption of a Council Decision amending Decision 2000/820/JHA establishing a European Police College (CEPOL)

(2004/C 20/07)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 30(1)(c) and Article 34(2)(c) thereof,

Having regard to the initiative of the United Kingdom(1),

Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament(2),

Whereas the Representatives of the Member States, meeting at Head of State or Government level on 13 December 2003, have agreed on the location of the seats of certain Offices and Agencies of the European Union, including the seat of the European Police College (CEPOL)(3),

Whereas this agreement should be incorporated in the Council Decision 2000/820/JHA(4),

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Council Decision 200/820/JHA is hereby amended as follows:

1. Article 1(1) shall read as follows:

"1. A European Police College (CEPOL) is hereby established. It shall have its seat in Bramshill, United Kingdom";

2. Article 4(1) shall read as follows:

"1. The governing board shall set up a permanent secretariat to assist CEPOL with the administrative tasks necessary for it to function and implement the annual programme and, where appropriate, the additional programmes and initiatives. The permanent secretariat may be set up within one of the national police academies.

The necessary arrangements concerning the accommodation to be provided for CEPOL in the United Kingdom and the facilities to be made available by the United Kingdom as well as particular rules applicable in the United Kingdom to members of CEPOL's organs, its Director, employees and members of their families shall be laid down in a headquarters agreement between CEPOL and the United Kingdom after obtaining the unanimous approval of the governing board.".

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 3

This Decision shall take effect on ...

Done at ...

For the Council

The President

(1) OJ C ...

(2) Opinion delivered ...

(3) OJ L ...

(4) OJ L 336, 30.12.2000, p. 1.
§ 198.37 State one-call damage prevention program. A State must adopt a one-call damage prevention program that requires each of the following at a minimum: ( a ) Each area of the State that contains underground pipeline facilities must be covered by a one-call notification system.
( b ) Each one-call notification system must be operated in accordance with § 198.39.
( c ) Excavators must be required to notify the operational center of the one-call notification system that covers the area of each intended excavation activity and provide the following information: ( 1 ) Name of the person notifying the system.
( 2 ) Name, address and telephone number of the excavator.
( 3 ) Specific location, starting date, and description of the intended excavation activity. However, an excavator must be allowed to begin an excavation activity in an emergency but, in doing so, required to notify the operational center at the earliest practicable moment.
( d ) The State must determine whether telephonic and other communications to the operational center of a one-call notification system under paragraph (c) of this section are to be toll free or not.
( e ) Except with respect to interstate transmission facilities as defined in the pipeline safety laws (49 U.S.C. 60101 *et seq.*), operators of underground pipeline facilities must be required to participate in the one-call notification systems that cover the areas of the State in which those pipeline facilities are located.
( f ) Operators of underground pipeline facilities participating in the one-call notification systems must be required to respond in the manner prescribed by § 192.614 (c)(4) through (c)(6) of this chapter to notices of intended excavation activity received from the operational center of a one-call notification system.
( g ) Persons who operate one-call notification systems or operators of underground pipeline facilities participating or required to participate in the one-call notification systems must be required to notify the public and known excavators in the manner prescribed by § 192.614 (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this chapter of the availability and use of one-call notification systems to locate underground pipeline facilities. However, this paragraph does not apply to persons (including operator's master meters) whose primary activity does not include the production, transportation or marketing of gas or hazardous liquids.
( h ) Operators of underground pipeline facilities (other than operators of interstate transmission facilities as defined in the pipeline safety laws (49 U.S.C. 60101 *et seq.*), and interstate pipelines as defined in § 195.2 of this chapter), excavators and persons who operate one-call notification systems who violate the applicable requirements of this subpart must be subject to civil penalties and injunctive relief that are substantially the same as are provided under the pipeline safety laws (49 U.S.C. 60101 *et seq.*).
[55 FR 38691, Sept. 20, 1990, as amended by Amdt. 198-2, 61 FR 18518, Apr. 26, 1996; Amdt. 198-6, 80 FR 188, Jan. 5, 2015]
Exhibit 10.24


 


March 28, 2006


 


Mr. Christopher
A. Pierce


67
Portland Street


Yarmouth,
ME 04096


 


RE:  First Amendment to Employment Agreement


 


Dear
Chris:


 


Reference is hereby made to the Employment and
Non-Competition Agreement dated as of May 25, 2004 (the “Employment
Agreement”) among The Dingley Press, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Employer”),
Christopher A. Pierce (the “Employee”) and solely for purposes of §4, The
Sheridan Group, Inc., a Maryland corporation and parent of the Employer (“Sheridan”).
Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings
assigned to such terms in the Employment Agreement.


 


1.     Amendments to Employment Agreement:  We
hereby further agree with you to amend the Employment Agreement effective April 1,
2006 as follows:


 


Section 2 of the Employment Agreement is hereby
amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


 


DUTIES:  The Employee shall be employed
as the Chairman of the Employer for the duration of the Agreement. In such
capacity, the Employee shall focus primarily on sales, marketing and customer
retention, but will not have day-to-day responsibility for the operations of
the Employer. In addition, the Employee shall have additional executive
responsibilities and duties as may be reasonably assigned by the President of
the Employer. The Employee shall report directly to the President of Employer. The
Employee agrees to devote his full time and best efforts to the performance of
his duties to the Employer. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as
prohibiting the Employee from serving (a) as a non-executive director of
any non-profit organization, including any industry trade group, or (b) as
a director of any other entity that is not in the Designated Industry, so long
as, in either such case, such position does not provide any compensation to the
Employee and otherwise does not materially interfere with the performance of
his duties under this Agreement.


 


2.     Miscellaneous:  In
all other respects, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.


 


Please indicate your agreement to the foregoing by
signing both copies of this letter, returning one to me and retaining the
second copy for your personal file.


 


Very truly yours,


 


	
   

  	
  The Sheridan Group, Inc.

  	
  The Dingley Press, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ John A. Saxton

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ John A. Saxton

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  John A Saxton

  	
   

  	
  John A. Saxton

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  President and Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Agreed to and accepted by:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Christopher A. Pierce

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Christopher A. Pierce
II

Calendar No. 132

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 93

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AUGUST 2, 2001

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment

AN ACT

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that the

mandatory separation age for Federal firefighters be

made the same as the age that applies with respect

to Federal law enforcement officers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Firefighters

5 Retirement Age Fairness Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. MANDATORY SEPARATION AGE FOR FIREFIGHTERS.

7 (a) CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM.—
2

•HR 93 RS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—The second sentence of sec2 tion 8335(b) of title 5, United States Code, is

3 amended—

4 (A) by inserting ‘‘, firefighter,’’ after ‘‘law

5 enforcement officer’’; and

6 (B) by inserting ‘‘, firefighter,’’ after ‘‘that

7 officer’’.

8 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

9 8335(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended

10 by striking the first sentence.

11 (b) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM.—

12 (1) IN GENERAL.—The second sentence of sec13 tion 8425(b) of title 5, United States Code, is

14 amended—

15 (A) by inserting ‘‘, firefighter,’’ after ‘‘law

16 enforcement officer’’ each place it appears; and

17 (B) by striking ‘‘courier’’ the second place

18 it appears and inserting ‘‘courier, as the case

19 may be,’’.

20 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

21 8425(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended

22 by striking the first sentence.

Calendar No. 132

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 93

AN ACT

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide

that the mandatory separation age for Federalfirefighters be made the same as the age that applies with respect to Federal law enforcement officers.

AUGUST 2, 2001

Reported without amendment
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 29, 1995 (123), Para 123.21 Correct Enrollment--H.R. 402]
[Page 1490]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.123.21  correct enrollment--h.r. 402

  On motion of Mr. LONGLEY, by unanimous consent, the following 
concurrent resolution of the Senate was taken from the Speaker's table 
(S. Con. Res. 27):

       Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 
     concurring), That the Clerk of the House of Representatives 
     is directed to correct the enrollment of H.R. 402 as follows:
       Amend section 109 to read:

     ``SEC. 109. CONFIRMATION OF WOODY ISLAND AS ELIGIBLE NATIVE 
                   VILLAGE.

       ``The Native Village of Woody, Island located on Woody 
     Island, Alaska, in the Koniag Region, is hereby confirmed as 
     an eligible Alaska Native Village, pursuant to section 
     11(b)(3) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 
     (``ANCSA''). It is further confirmed that Leisnoi, Inc., is 
     the Village Corporation, as that term is defined in section 
     3(j) of the ANCSA, for the village of Woody Island. This 
     section shall become effective on October 1, 1998, unless the 
     United States judicial system determines this village was 
     fraudulently established under ANCSA prior to October 1, 
     1998.''.

  When said concurrent resolution was considered.
  Mr. LONGLEY submitted the following amendment which was agreed to:

       On page 1, line 2, strike all that follows after ``That'' 
     to the end of the resolution and insert the following:
       ``the action of the Speaker of the House of Representatives 
     and the President pro tempore of the Senate in signing the 
     bill (H.R. 402) is rescinded, and the Clerk of the House of 
     Representatives shall, in the reenrollment of the bill, make 
     the following correction:
       Strike section 109''.

  The concurrent resolution, as amended, was agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said concurrent resolution, as 
amended, was agreed to was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
amendment.
```
Order entered April 10, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-20-00193-CV

IN RE AEP TEXAS, INC., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-01068

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT relator’s April 6,

2020 motion and DISMISS this original proceeding. Each party shall bear its own

costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
exv10w15



 






Exhibit 10.15




EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT




     The undersigned and AdStar, Inc., hereby agree that upon the effective date of the new
Employment Agreement between them to be executed on the date hereof, the annual rate of
compensation specified therein shall be reduced by five percent (5%) to a rate of $202,160 per
annum, such reduction to continue until 10 days after the undersigned provides written notice to
AdStar of the revocation of this voluntary salary reduction, or in the absence of notice, until the
expiration of the term of the Agreement.



Dated: December 21, 2005




	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	AdStar, Inc.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	by:	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Leslie Bernhard

	 	 	 	Eli Rousso,
	 

	 	 	 	Executive Vice President
PUBLIC LAW 106–261—AUG. 18, 2000 114 STAT. 735

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1749:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106–500 (Comm. on Resources).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106–320 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: Vol. 146 (2000):

Feb. 29, considered and passed House.

June 27, considered and passed Senate.

WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 36 (2000):

Aug. 18, Presidential statement.

Æ

Public Law 106–261

106th Congress

An Act

To designate Wilson Creek in Avery and Caldwell Counties, North Carolina, as

a component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section

3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is

amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

‘‘(161) WILSON CREEK, NORTH CAROLINA.—(A) The 23.3 mile

segment of Wilson Creek in the State of North Carolina from

its headwaters to its confluence with Johns River, to be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture in the following classifications:

‘‘(i) The 2.9 mile segment from its headwaters below

Calloway Peak downstream to the confluence of Little Wilson

Creek, as a scenic river.

‘‘(ii) The 4.6 segment from Little Wilson Creek downstream

to the confluence of Crusher Branch, as a wild river.

‘‘(iii) The 15.8 segment from Crusher Branch downstream

to the confluence of Johns River, as a recreational river.

‘‘(B) The Forest Service or any other agency of the Federal

Government may not undertake condemnation proceedings for the

purpose of acquiring public right-of-way or access to Wilson Creek

against the private property of T. Henry Wilson, Jr., or his heirs

or assigns, located in Avery County, North Carolina (within the

area 36°, 4 min., 21 sec. North 81°, 47 min., 37° West and 36°,

3 min., 13 sec. North and 81° 45 min. 55 sec. West), in the area

of Wilson Creek designated as a wild river.’’.

Approved August 18, 2000.

Aug. 18, 2000

[H.R. 1749]
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 11:33 AM

Received: July 14, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jze-uh7m

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2271

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Gary Harbaugh

Address: 

8303 Chapel Bend Dr

Fort Wayne, IN, 46835

General Comment

I have managed my own investments for many years and do not want or need a government 

agency trying to impose its rules or guidelines on my choices. I have also observed that most 

people who control their own investments seek the level of guidance they need to make decisions 

that fit their circumstances. They do so of their own volition and do not need a meddling 

government to get involved in the way they choose advisers.
§ 380.603 Applicability. ( a ) The rules in this subpart apply to all entry-level drivers, as defined in this subpart, who intend to drive CMVs as defined in § 383.5 of this chapter in interstate and/or intrastate commerce, except: ( 1 ) Drivers excepted from the CDL requirements under § 383.3(c), (d), and (h) of this chapter;
( 2 ) Drivers applying for a restricted CDL under § 383.3(e) through (g) of this chapter;
( 3 ) Military personnel with military CMV experience who meet all the requirements and conditions of § 383.77 of this chapter; and
( 4 ) Drivers applying for a removal of a restriction in accordance with § 383.135(b)(7).
( b ) Drivers issued a Class A CDL, Class B CDL, or a passenger (P), school bus (S), or hazardous materials (H) endorsement before February 7, 2022, are not required to comply with this subpart pertaining to that CDL or endorsement.
( c ) ( 1 ) Individuals who obtain a CLP before February 7, 2022, are not required to comply with this subpart if they obtain a CDL before the CLP or renewed CLP expires.
( 2 ) Individuals who obtain a CLP on or after February 7, 2022, are required to comply with this subpart.
( 3 ) Except for individuals seeking the H endorsement, individuals must complete the theory and BTW (range and public road) portions of entry-level driver training within one year of completing the first portion.
[81 FR 88790, Dec. 8, 2016, as amended at 83 FR 48725, Sept. 27, 2018; 85 FR 6100, Feb. 4, 2020; 86 FR 57069, Oct. 14, 2021]