alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 238.415 Rollover strength. ( a ) Each passenger car and power car shall be designed to rest on its side and be uniformly supported at the top (“roof rail”) and the bottom chords (“side sill”) of the side frame. The allowable stress in the structural members of the occupied volumes for this condition shall be one-half yield or one-half the critical buckling stress, whichever is less. Minor localized deformations to the outer side skin of the passenger car or power car is allowed provided such deformations in no way intrude upon the occupied volume of each car.
( b ) Each passenger car and power car shall also be designed to rest on its roof so that any damage in occupied areas is limited to roof sheathing and framing. The allowable stress in the structural members of the occupied volumes for this condition shall be one-half yield or one-half the critical buckling stress, whichever is less. Deformation to the roof sheathing and framing is allowed to the extent necessary to permit the vehicle to be supported directly on the top chords of the side frames and end frames.
From: Jane Foytek [mailto:jane.foytek@gmail.com] 

Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 3:34 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Do not let The Department of Labor have jurisdiction over my IRA of 401(k).

My first experience with a 401(k) was with Fidelity in 1983. An excellent experience! ! ! I have 

since moved to Vanguard (lower expense ratios).

Rather than start a new set of regulations, fees, fines, penalties, etc. Just advise people to look 

for established mutual funds.

Jane Foytek
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyj-ch4a

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2197

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Susan M. Barker

Address: United States,

General Comment

I am capable of planning my own retirement, thank you very much!!
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0684.html[7/21/2015 8:34:35 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-96ej

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0684

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Leslee Luettel

General Comment

I through my employer, have set up a very good retirement plan, it's a 401k and I don't need governments help.

 Leave my retirement to me, please.
-----Original Message----- 

From: eve@aaobserver.com [mailto:eve@aaobserver.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 8:15 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Eve Silberman 

1315 South Maple 

Ann Arbor, MI 48103
§ 25.520 Job classification and structure. A recipient shall not: ( a ) Classify a job as being for males or for females;
( b ) Maintain or establish separate lines of progression, seniority lists, career ladders, or tenure systems based on sex; or
( c ) Maintain or establish separate lines of progression, seniority systems, career ladders, or tenure systems for similar jobs, position descriptions, or job requirements that classify persons on the basis of sex, unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the positions in question as set forth in § 25.550.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A2112. BETHEA CRABTREE v. CRANFORD HOMES, INC.

In this civil action, defendant Bethea Crabtree filed this direct appeal from a

trial court order granting plaintiff Cranford Homes, Inc.’s motion to confirm an

arbitration award. We lack jurisdiction.

“[T]his Court has no jurisdiction to consider an appeal taken from a reviewing

court’s order confirming an arbitration award; rather, upon entry of the court’s order

confirming the award, a separate judgment must also be entered by the reviewing

court, and this Court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal taken from the judgment.

OCGA §§ 5-6-34 (a); 9-9-15; 9-9-16.” Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Jones, 333 Ga.

App. 184, 184 (1) (775 SE2d 714) (2015); see also McFarland v. Roberts, 335 Ga.

App. 40, 47 (1), n. 4 (778 SE2d 349) (2015) (“An order simply confirming an

arbitration award is not a final, appealable judgment . . . .”). Although the

confirmation order and judgment may be entered on the same document, see Green

Tree Servicing, LLC, 333 Ga. App. at 185 (1), the trial court here did not enter a final

judgment in the order confirming the arbitration award, and no final judgment appears

in the record.

Where no final judgment has been entered, parties are required to follow the

interlocutory appeal procedures – including obtaining a certificate of immediate

review from the trial court – to appeal the order confirming the arbitration award. See

OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Boyd v. State, 191 Ga. App. 435, 435 (383 SE2d 906) (1989). 

November 03, 2020
Crabtree’s failure to do so here deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is

hereby DISMISSED. See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/03/2020
Exhibit 34.2


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company:





We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying “Report on assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Asset-Backed Securities”, that The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the asset-backed securities transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving phase-in recovery property (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2014 and for the year then ended , excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(i-iv), 1122(d)(2)(i-vii), 1122(d)(3)(ii-iv), and 1122(d)(4)(i-v, ix-xiii, xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform or the servicing activities are applicable to the Platform but are excluded from the scope of management's assertion and are not reported on herein.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.











/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





Cleveland, OH


March 27, 2015
From: Dan Ewing [mailto:danewing@windstream.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 9:46 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32 Definition of fiduciary

Here are a couple proposed rules for the rule makers.

1) If you personally don't have at least $500,000 saved for retirement, you are not qualified to 

have an informed opinion or make rules that affect the rest of America. I'd prefer it to be 

$1,000,000, but I'm trying to be reasonable.

2) If you don't personally have a large chunk of your retirement savings in the C, S, and I funds 

of the Thrift Savings Plan, you have a conflict of interest and need to recuse yourself from any 

discussion on investing. You have shown yourself through your actions to be opposed to or 

afraid of investing. (I might be willing to compromise if you have all or most of your investment 

in an appropriate Lifecycle fund.)

The problem I see with retirement saving and investment isn't a lack of regulation, it's a lack of 

education. With the current regulations, companies are de facto prohibited from providing any 

meaningful 401(k) investment advice to their employees. They have to convince someone 

outside the company to come in and do so. This regulation would make that even harder by 

either making them do it for free or requiring them to be a Registered Investment Adviser.

Rather than more regulation, people would be better served by an educational program that 

teaches what stocks are, what mutual funds are, what bonds are, what money markets are, and 

what the pros and cons of each are. How do you compare an investment to an index? What's the 

value of compound interest -- why is 10% growth more than 5 times better than 2% 

growth? Here's the kicker: why you will never retire with a decent standard of living if you have

nothing more than Social Security.

No offense, but the US Federal Government (which can't even balance a budget) is the absolute 

LAST source for such an education. That's where outside investment advice comes in. Don't 

make it harder for companies to provide this advice, make it easier. Set up an environment that 

encourages companies to bring in (and pay) an outside expert like Dave Ramsey, Ric Edelman, 

or Clark Howard to teach employees how to invest. If the outside expert provides bad advice, 

current law provides a legal remedy. Redefining 'fiduciary' in a way that restricts these 

arrangements is foolishness.

Dan Ewing

Lexington, KY

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
#### William O. Leland and another, *Respondents, v.*Jacob Marshall, *Appellant.*

Judgment of the County Court and that of the’ justice reversed Opinion by

Barker, J.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0554.html[7/20/2015 8:39:13 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-errk

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0554

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Kevin Leslie

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement.

Kevin Leslie
-----Original Message----- 

From: mark4811@sbcglobal.net [mailto:mark4811@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:56 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Mark Halas 

2275 Latham st #37 

Mt View, CA 94040
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ROGELIO MENDEZ, JR., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4052 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed March 7, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; William D. Sites, Judge. Rogelio Mendez, Jr., pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ey v. State, 982 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 2008); Mendez v. State, 229 So. 3d 335 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (table decision); Mendez v. State, 190 So. 3d 71 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (table decision); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Chandler v. State, 1 So. 3d 284 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Waiter v. State, 965 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Bizzell v. State, 912 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Gusow v. State, 6 So. 3d 699 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 10.44


 


Kaiser Group Holdings, Inc.


2006 Annual Compensation


 


	
  Name:

  	
   

  	
  Douglas W. McMinn

  
	
  Title:

  	
   

  	
  President and Chief
  Executive Officer

  
	
  Base
  Salary:

  	
   

  	
  $235,000, effective
  September 9, 2005.

  
	
  Discretionary
  Bonus:

  	
   

  	
  To be determined by the
  Compensation Committee. 2005 bonus compensation was $225,000 (100% of 2005
  base salary).

  
	
  Equity-Based
  Compensation:

  	
   

  	
  Grant of 2,000 shares of
  Common Stock under the Kaiser Group Holdings, Inc. 2002 Equity Compensation
  Plan, as amended.

  
	
  Severance
  Arrangement:

  	
   

  	
  If the Company terminates
  Mr. McMinn’s employment, other than for cause, Mr. McMinn will be entitled to
  severance equal to nine months’ salary. For each additional six months of
  service after March 9, 2006, such severance amount will be increased by one
  month’s salary, up to a maximum severance amount of one year’s salary.

  



 


 


	
  Name:

  	
   

  	
  Nicholas
  Burakow

  
	
  Title:

  	
   

  	
  Current: Senior Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer. Effective April 1, 2006: Executive Vice
  President and Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer.

  
	
  Base Salary:

  	
   

  	
  $180,000,
  effective September 9, 2005.

  
	
  Discretionary Bonus:

  	
   

  	
  To
  be determined by the Compensation Committee. 2005 bonus compensation was
  $172,000 (100% of 2005 base salary).

  
	
  Equity-Based Compensation:

  	
   

  	
  N/A

  
	
  Severance Arrangement:

  	
   

  	
  If
  the Company terminates Dr. Burakow’s employment, other than for cause, Dr.
  Burakow will be entitled to severance equal to nine months’ salary. For each
  additional six months of service after March 9, 2006, such severance amount
  will be increased by one month’s salary, up to a maximum severance amount of
  one year’s salary.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, November 7, 1995 (141), Para 141.13 Free-Roaming Horses in Ozark Scenic Riverways]
[Page 1875]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.141.13  free-roaming horses in ozark scenic riverways

  Mr. COOLEY moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 238) to 
provide for the protection of wild horses within the Ozark National 
Scenic Riverways and prohibit the removal of such horses; as amended.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, recognized Mr. COOLEY and Mr. 
RICHARDSON, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill, as amended?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said bill, as amended, was passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and 
said bill, as amended, was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the 
table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.
```
###### Editorial Note on [Part 192](/current/title-49/part-192?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at [71 FR 33406](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/71-FR-33406), June 9, 2006.

#### § 192.115 Temperature derating factor (*T*) for steel pipe.

The temperature derating factor to be used in the design formula in [§ 192.105](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-192.105) is determined as follows:

| Gas temperature in degrees Fahrenheit (Celsius) | Temperature derating factor (T) |
| --- | --- |
| 250 °F (121 °C) or less | 1.000 |
| 300 °F (149 °C) | 0.967 |
| 350 °F (177 °C) | 0.933 |
| 400 °F (204 °C) | 0.900 |
| 450 °F (232 °C) | 0.867 |

For intermediate gas temperatures, the derating factor is determined by interpolation.

[[35 FR 13257](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/35-FR-13257), Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 192-85, [63 FR 37502](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/63-FR-37502), July 13, 1998]
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2404

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 25), 1995

Received

AN ACT

To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act of 1994 until November 1, 1995, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 583(a) of the Foreign Re5 lations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995

6 (Public Law 103–236), as amended by Public Law 104–

7 22, is amended by striking ‘‘October 1, 1995,’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘November 1, 1995,’’.
2

HR 2404 RDS

1 (b) CONSULTATION.—For purposes of any exercise of

2 the authority provided in section 583(a) of the Foreign

3 Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995

4 (Public Law 103–236) prior to October 5, 1995, the writ5 ten policy justification dated June 1, 1995, and submitted

6 to the Congress in accordance with section 583(b)(1) of

7 such Act, and the consultations associated with such policy

8 justification, shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements

9 of section 583(b)(1) of such Act.

Passed the House of Representatives September 28,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
#### § 234.243 Wire on pole line and aerial cable.

Wire on a pole line shall be securely attached to an insulator that is properly fastened to a cross arm or bracket supported by a pole or other support. Wire shall not interfere with, or be interfered with by, other wires on the pole line. Aerial cable shall be supported by messenger wire. An open-wire transmission line operating at voltage of 750 volts or more shall be placed not less than 4 feet above the nearest cross arm carrying active warning system circuits.
Exhibit 32.2   CHIRON
CORPORATION   SECTION 1350
CERTIFICATION  In connection with the periodic report of CHIRON CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation(the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, DAVID V. SMITH, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) 
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  (2) 
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.  This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.   Date: November 12, 2003
  By:
  /s/  David V.
  SmithDAVID
  V. SMITHVice President,
  Finance andChief Financial
  Officer