alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 6/18/15 4:18 PM

Received: June 16, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jgl-s1fc

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0318

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Colin Mackenzie

General Comment

Given the complexity and the potential for unintended consequences coming from this proposed 

rule, on the availability of education and advice to the public, the period for analysis and 

comment needs to be extended. Existing regulations were carefully put in place and before new 

regulations are added, they should receive more, not less scrutiny and time for evaluation. 

Please extend the evaluation and comment period to the more normal 180 day period. Thank 

you!

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b3f376&format=xml&show... 6/18/2015
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyj-3x2h

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2199

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jeffrey Rasmussen

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan my own retirement. Butt out of my life!
#### § 230.65 Steam blocking view of engine crew.

The steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall keep the boiler, and its piping and appurtenances, in such repair that they do not emit steam in a manner that obscures the engine crew's vision.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2013

p1216 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2013

147757

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGA N,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147757

COA: 313186

Oakland CC: 2009

- 228234

- FC

STEPHEN LAWRENCE FLOYD,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 2, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0673.html[7/21/2015 8:27:04 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-fd1h

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0673

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Toni Anonymous

General Comment

I don't need the government to tell me how to spend my money.
-----Original Message----- 

From: adorth@sbcglobal.net [mailto:adorth@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:13 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Arabella Dorth 

1212 11th Avenue 

San Francisco, CA 94122
A01A0753.

#### BURKETT v. ESTATE OF BURKETT.

(548 SE2d 628)

Johnson, Presiding Judge.

Rosie Burkett, as the surviving spouse of Milton Burkett, filed a petition for year’s support. An adult child of the decedent filed a caveat to the petition. Following a bench trial, the probate court awarded Rosie Burkett a year’s support, but stated that due to her *720separate income, estate and benefits, the entire estate should not be set apart to her as year’s support. The trial court awarded her a life estate in the property where she lives, as well as full interest in and to the household furnishings, goods and appliances. She appeals, alleging the trial court erred in failing to set aside the entire estate on her behalf.

Decided March 21, 2001.

*Melvyn J. Williams,*for appellant.

*J. Michael Cranford,*for appellee.

Pursuant to OCGA § 53-3-7,1 the probate court was required to set aside a sufficient amount from the estate for Rosie Burkett’s support and maintenance for the period of 12 months from the date of Milton Burkett’s death. The statute notes that a sufficient amount is that amount necessary to maintain the standard of living that Rosie Burkett had prior to Milton Burkett’s death and mandates that, in determining that amount, the probate court shall consider (1) the support available to Rosie Burkett from sources other than year’s support, including but not limited to the principal of any separate estate and the income and earning capacity of Rosie Burkett, and (2) such other relevant criteria as the court deems equitable and proper.2 A probate court’s determination regarding the amount to be awarded as year’s support will be upheld by this Court absent an abuse of discretion.3

In the present case, it is clear from the exhibits and the parties’ briefs that the parties presented the probate court with differing assessments of Rosie Burkett’s needs and her standard of living prior to her husband’s death. However, a transcript of the probate court’s hearing on these issues has not been included in the record on appeal. In the absence of a transcript, we must assume that the probate court’s actions would be supported by the record.4 We cannot conclude based on the record before us that the probate court abused its discretion in failing to set aside the entire estate in favor of Rosie Burkett.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Ruffin and Ellington, JJ., concur.*

1

 Effective January 1, 1998, as provided in OCGA § 53-1-1, the year’s support criteria are set out in OCGA § 53-3-7 rather than OCGA § 53-5-2. See *Richards v. Wadsworth,*230 Ga. App. 421, 422 (2) (496 SE2d 535) (1998).

2

 OCGA § 53-3-7 (c).

3

*McClure v. Mason,*228 Ga. App. 797, 799 (2) (493 SE2d 16) (1997).

4

*In re Estate of Gordon,*239 Ga. App. 306, 307 (3) (521 SE2d 223) (1999); *Gary v. Weiner,*233 Ga. App. 284-285 (1) (503 SE2d 898) (1998).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on June 5, 2007, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Interactive Advertising Bureau (“IAB”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, IAB is currently developing Online Advertising Creative Delivery “Best Practices” Guidelines, Insertion Order and eBusiness Standards and Lead Generation Data Delivery “Best                           ( print page 51841)                        Practices” Guidelines, and amending the Ad Unit Guidelines (formerly known as the Half-Page Ad Standard Guidelines) which were listed in the IAB's original notification.                 

                    On September 17, 2004, IAB filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 21, 2004 (69 FR 61868).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 6, 2006. a notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 30, 2006 (71 FR 63358).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antirust Division.

[FR Doc. 07-4436 Filed 9-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### § 38.59 Floor surfaces.

Floor surfaces on aisles, places for standees, and areas where wheelchair and mobility aid users are to be accommodated shall be slip-resistant.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0919.html[7/21/2015 6:12:10 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-hetq

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0919

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Wayne Bennett

General Comment

I can plan for my own retirement, thank you none the less for thinking about me. Please stop what you are

 considering doing and don't do it. I don't want it, my wife doesn't want it and my son thinks he can handle it for

 himself as well.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1025.html[7/22/2015 6:47:16 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-ped2

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1025

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Sandy Braccini

General Comment

I can do my own retirement - do not but in
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.36

                             THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE
                              PREMCOR PENSION PLAN

          WHEREAS, Premcor Inc. ("Company") previously established the Premcor
Pension Plan ("Plan"); and

          WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan in Section
12 thereof; and

          WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to grant past service
for certain acquired employees at the Memphis Refinery;

          NOW, THEREFORE, Section 4A of the Plan is amended by adding the
following to the end thereof:

          "With respect to an individual who (a) is a Business Employee as
defined in the Asset Purchase and Sales Agreement dated November 25, 2002,
executed between the Company and The Williams Company and (b) becomes an
Employee prior to January 1, 2004, for purposes of determining such Employee's
Years of Vesting Service, service with The Williams Company and its controlled
group members completed prior to such date shall count as service with the
Employer under the Plan."

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be
executed by a duly authorized officer this 28th day of February, 2003.

                                        PREMCOR INC.



                                        By: /s/ James R. Voss
                                            -----------------

                                        Name: James R. Voss

                                        Title: Senior Vice President
HENRY COUNTY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David H. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Charles W. Blair, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David H. GillDavid H. Gill, President and CEO(Principal Executive Officer)




/s/ Charles W. Blair, Jr.Charles W. Blair, Jr., EVP and CFO(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


August 13, 2010
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2321

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to make a grant for improvements

to the New York City subway system, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 13, 1995

Mr. NADLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to make a grant

for improvements to the New York City subway system,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘West Side Subway

5 Corridor Improvements Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSES.

7 The purposes of this Act are to—

8 (1) make improvements to the New York sub9 way system;

10 (2) further comply with the Clean Air Act;
2

•HR 2321 IH

1 (3) address transportation problems associated

2 with the growth in population on the West Side of

3 New York City; and

4 (4) address dangerous and overcrowded condi5 tions at the West 72nd Street subway station.

6 SEC. 3. GRANT.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Transportation

8 shall make a grant under chapter 53 of title 49, United

9 States Code, to the New York City Transit Authority for

10 making improvements to the New York City subway sys11 tem from the West 66th Street subway station to the West

12 72nd Street subway station. The project shall include the

13 provision of temporary bus service from the West 72nd

14 Street subway station to the Grand Central terminal in

15 New York City while such improvements are being made.

16 (b) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost

17 of the project under this section shall be 80 percent.

18 (c) GRANTS AS CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS.—A

19 grant approved by the Secretary under this section shall

20 be a contractual obligation of the United States to pay

21 the Federal Government’s share of the project.

22 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is

23 authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section
3

•HR 2321 IH

1 from the Mass Transit Account of the Highway Trust

2 Fund $43,000,000 for fiscal year 1997.

Æ
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0494.html[7/20/2015 3:32:33 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-lgtk

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0494

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: paul vermeire

General Comment

!Keep your government hands away from my retirement income. It is not yours. You did not earn it! I did!
Exhibit 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
                                   ACT OF 2002


I, Richard A. Bianco, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of AmBase Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a  material  fact or omit to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

     5. The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based
on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control over financial  reporting to
the  registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee of  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  controls over  financial  reporting  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.


/s/Richard A. Bianco
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 30, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-4122

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NATHANIEL GREEN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CR-04-677) Submitted: September 29, 2005 Decided: October 5, 2005 Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathaniel Green, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Hechtkopf, John Hinton, III, M. Kendall Day, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Green argues: (1) that he removed any “presumption of power of attorney that the United States government” had on him; (2) that he declared that he is of the Washitaw Muurs nationality, rather than a U.S. citizen; (3) that he revoked all signatures and powers of attorney of previously filed W-4 forms and state and local tax forms; (4) that he emancipated himself from his government-issued birth certificate in accordance with the Uniform Commercial Code; and (5) that the government’s use of his name violates a copyright as the name is a trade name under the Uniform Commercial Code. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Nathaniel Green appeals his conviction for several counts of filing false tax documents, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1) (2000), aiding and assisting in the preparation of false tax documents, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2) (2000), and obstruction of justice, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503 (2000). Green was sentenced to thirty-six months of imprisonment, to be followed by three years of supervised release. Green, representing himself on appeal as he did below, raises several challenges to his conviction. Because these arguments are baseless, * we deny Green’s motion for transcript at government expense and affirm Green’s conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED