alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Paulson Capital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Karen L. Johannes, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

(1)    The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Karen L. JohannesKaren L. JohannesChief Financial OfficerPaulson Capital Corp.August 11, 2006

This certificationis made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any otherpurpose.  A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Paulson CapitalCorp. and will be retained by Paulson Capital Corp. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
#### § 303.3 Application of this part.

The provisions of this part are applicable to all elements of the FMCSA and to any program or activity for which Federal financial assistance is authorized under a law administered by the FMCSA. This part provides Title VI guidelines for State Departments of Transportation and local State agencies, including their sub-recipients, to implement Title VI. It also applies to money paid, property transferred, or other Federal financial assistance extended under any program of the FMCSA after the date of this part.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0983.html[7/21/2015 7:20:04 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-euxw

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0983

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Richard Hanson

Address:

1720 Lions Gate Ln

El Paso, TX, 79936

Email: rhanso72@yahoo.com

Phone: 915 276 3004

General Comment

My plan is my business. Go away.
-----Original Message-----

Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 11:24 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32"

This prospective change doesn't service the interest of the average American consumer. I would like to 

encourage the department of Labor to focus on helping protect American consumers with rules that 

encourage full disclosure and more competition......THIS RULE will reduce competition and increase cost 

to CONSUMERS....

Thank you,
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 173 / Friday, September 7, 2007 / Presidential Documents 51553 

Proclamation 8174 of September 4, 2007 

Patriot Day, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

September 11, 2001, was a defining moment in American history. On that 

terrible day, our Nation saw the face of evil as 19 men barbarously attacked 

us and wantonly murdered people of many races, nationalities, and creeds. 

On Patriot Day, we remember the innocent victims, and we pay tribute 

to the valiant firefighters, police officers, emergency personnel, and ordinary 

citizens who risked their lives so others might live. 

After the attacks on 9/11, America resolved that we would go on the offense 

against our enemies, and we would not distinguish between the terrorists 

and those who harbor and support them. All Americans honor the selfless 

men and women of our Armed Forces, the dedicated members of our public 

safety, law enforcement, and intelligence communities, and the thousands 

of others who work hard each day to protect our country, secure our liberty, 

and prevent future attacks. 

The spirit of our people is the source of America’s strength, and 6 years 

ago, Americans came to the aid of neighbors in need. On Patriot Day, 

we pray for those who died and for their families. We volunteer to help 

others and demonstrate the continuing compassion of our citizens. On this 

solemn occasion, we rededicate ourselves to laying the foundation of peace 

with confidence in our mission and our free way of life. 

By a joint resolution approved December 18, 2001 (Public Law 107–89), 

the Congress has designated September 11 of each year as ‘‘Patriot Day.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim September 11, 2007, as Patriot Day. I call 

upon the Governors of the United States and the Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico, as well as appropriate officials of all units of government, to direct 

that the flag be flown at half-staff on Patriot Day. I also call upon the 

people of the United States to observe Patriot Day with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and remembrance services, to display the flag at halfstaff from their homes on that day, and to observe a moment of silence 

beginning at 8:46 a.m. eastern daylight time to honor the innocent Americans 

and people from around the world who lost their lives as a result of the 

terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS5
51554 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 173 / Friday, September 7, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day 

of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtysecond. 

[FR Doc. 07–4423 

Filed 9–6–07; 10:10 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS5GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
§ 229.55 Piston travel. ( a ) Brake cylinder piston travel shall be sufficient to provide brake shoe clearance when the brakes are released.
( b ) When the brakes are applied on a standing locomotive, the brake cylinder piston travel may not exceed 11 ⁄ 2 inches less than the total possible piston travel. The total possible piston travel for each locomotive shall be entered on Form FRA F 6180-49A.
( c ) The minimum brake cylinder pressure shall be 30 pounds per square inch.
§ 25.505 Employment criteria. A recipient shall not administer or operate any test or other criterion for any employment opportunity that has a disproportionately adverse effect on persons on the basis of sex unless: ( a ) Use of such test or other criterion is shown to predict validly successful performance in the position in question; and
( b ) Alternative tests or criteria for such purpose, which do not have such disproportionately adverse effect, are shown to be unavailable.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1047.html[7/22/2015 7:02:17 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-uxhr

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1047

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Rodney Worth

General Comment

I am opposed to any changes in current rules regarding 401K, Roth IRA or any other Federal government

 regulated retirement instruments. These programs are the backbone of many citizens' retirement finances and the

 current rules and regulations are sufficient for handling of these funds. Given the Federal governments

 incompetent and unauthorized intervention in other aspects of citizen's lives, this would be just another

 bureaucratic and inefficient intrusion. Sooner or later honest American citizens are going to revolt against these

 intrusions.
Ps

IOWA FARM BUREAU

July 10, 2015

Employee Benefits Security Administration
Office of Regulations and Interpretations
U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Room N-5655
Washington, DC 20210

Re: Definition of the Term “Fiduciary;” Conflict of Interest Rule
Retirement Investment Advice, RIN 1210-AB32

Re: Proposed Best Interest Contract Exemption, ZRIN 1210-2A25

Re: Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption
(PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Consultants,
Insurance Companies and Investment Company Principal Underwriters, ZRIN 1210-ZA25

To Whom it May Concern:

| am the President of the lowa Farm Bureau Federation, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Farm Bureau Life
Insurance Company and am pleased to provide these comments with respect to the Department of Labor's notice of
proposed rulemaking concerning the Definition of the Term “Fiduciary” of an employee benefit plan (the “Proposed
Regulation’), the related proposed Best Interest Contract Exemption (the “Proposed BIC Exemption”), and the
proposed amendment to and proposed partial revocation of prohibited transaction exemption 84-24 (the “Proposed
PTE 84-24 Exemption Amendment’) (collectively, the ‘Proposal’.

The lowa Farm Bureau Federation is a grassroots, statewide organization dedicated to helping lowa farm families
prosper and improve their quality of life. More than 156,000 families in lowa are Farm Bureau members, working
together to achieve farm and rural prosperity. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company, is an lowa domiciled life
insurance company that markets life insurance and annuity products in the following states: Arizona, Kansas, Idaho,
lowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Utah, Wisconsin and
Wyoming. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company provides insurance and financial services to Farm Bureau members
and others in rural areas of the West and Midwest that other insurers have long since abandoned.

Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company is a member of both the American Council of Life Insurers ("ACLI") and the
Investment Retirement Institute ("IRI"). Our management has been working closely with both organizations with
respect to comment letters those organizations are preparing and will be submitting in response to the above-
referenced proposal. We strongly support and endorse the positions in the comment letters of both the ACLI and the
IRI and ask that the Department of Labor address the issues raised in the letters of those two associations.

Sincerely;
omy

Craig Fil, President
lowa Farm Bureau

5400 University Avenue, West Des Moines, IA 50266-5997 / (515) 225-5400
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0764.html[7/21/2015 12:12:14 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-2pjs

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0764

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Richmond Littlefield

General Comment

We do not want the Fed Govt running our retirement funds--look what they have done to our Social Security.

 You plan to invest in US treasuries I suppose but the future of US Treasuries is very uncertain with the IMF

 about to make various changes to international finance. Get the Hell out--it is too complicated for you and you

 would only mess it up any way.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6512

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTONIO MCNEELY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge. (1:11-cr-00114-CCB-21)

Submitted: August 24, 2017 Decided: August 29, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio McNeely, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin M. Block, OFFICE OF THE UNITED 

STATES ATTORNEY, Debra Lynn Dwyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Michael 

Clayton Hanlon, Assistant United States Attorney, Christopher M. Mason, Special 

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio McNeely appeals the district court’s order granting reconsideration of the 

court’s prior order denying McNeely’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion and 

reducing McNeely’s sentence pursuant to Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing 

Guidelines Manual.

*

 We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. McNeely, 

No. 1:11-cr-00114-CCB-21 (D. Md. Mar. 23, 2017). We deny McNeely’s motion for the 

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * Although the district court ultimately granted McNeely’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, 

the reduction granted by the court did not reduce McNeely’s sentence to the full extent he 

requested.
§ 37.93 One car per train rule. ( a ) The definition of accessible for purposes of meeting the one car per train rule is spelled out in the applicable subpart for each transportation system type in part 38 of this title.
( b ) Each person providing intercity rail service and each commuter rail authority shall ensure that, as soon as practicable, but in no event later than July 26, 1995, that each train has one car that is readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs.
( c ) Each public entity providing light or rapid rail service shall ensure that each train, consisting of two or more vehicles, includes at least one car that is readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs, as soon as practicable but in no case later than July 25, 1995.
From: Joe E. Hodge, III [mailto:joehodge@justawakening.com] 

Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 12:42 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comments on Mental Health Parity and COBRA

It has been my experience that employer provided insurance exhibits several deficiencies 

the area of mental health. For some reason, even now in the 21st century, insurance 

providers are allowed to treat mental illness, the medications required to treat them and 

the very physicians that administer the health care as if mental illness is not a "true" 

illness. The policies often provide for severely limited office visits (setting a maximum 

for each year), small physician selection lists, and physician payments that do not even 

come close to meeting the rates of psychiatrists. In an age where mental illness is 

scientifically recognized as having its basis in the physical body, it is hard to reconcile 

the differences in coverage. 

Please help those of us that suffer from these maladies by allowing us equal treatment 

coverage rather that the insurance industry's 17th century-like discrimination. 

On another problem that affects anyone trying to use their rights under COBRA, 

companies such as AT&T are disregarding COBRA late payment policy, length of 

access, and basically using ANY excuse to terminate their COBRA obligations early. I 

have had to pay in advance, been informed that should I become eligible for any other 

health insurance that my coverage will be terminated, among other hardships that may be 

visited upon me in direct conflict with both the spirit and letter of COBRA. It is probably 

too late to help us keep our insurance but, in this economy, many others will be rendered 

jobless while ill as well. 

Thank you, 

Joe E. Hodge, III

joehodge@justawakening.com
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT WILLIAMS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 29

- 31 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of April , 2018, Petitioner’s several Applications Seeking

Leave to File Replies and Amended Reply are GRANTED.

In response to Petitioner’s other various filings, this Court exercises its King’s

Bench jurisdiction. See 42 Pa.C.S. §502; see als o Commonwealth v. Chimenti , 507 A.2d

79 (1986) ( discussing King’s Bench jurisdiction as an exercise of this Court’s inherent

supervisory powers).

The Commonwealth has recently stated, on the record in open court, that there

are credibility issues with a police officer who was a “ critical witness” at Petitioner’s trial.

As such, the Commonwealth agreed that Petitioner is entitled to PCRA relief. Moreover,

as reflected in filings in this Court, the Commonwealth has stated i t is not opposed to

Petitioner being granted immediate bai l.

As such, the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to issue

a final resolution with respect to the pending Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition[ 29

- 31 EM 2018 ]

- 2

within 60 days. To ensure compliance with this schedule, the litigants shall make every

reasonable effort to expedite their filings in connection with that proceeding.

Additionally, the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to

immediately issue an order releasing Petitioner on unsecured bail. Moreover, as offered

by Petitioner and having received no objection by the Commonwealth, the conditions of

bail are to be similar or identical to those that governed Petitioner’s probation prior to

August 1, 2017. B ail shall continue until final resolutio n of the PCRA matter, including

any appellate review.

At this juncture, the reques t for immediate reassignment to another jurist is

DENIED. Notwithstanding this denial, it is noted that the presiding jurist may opt to

remove herself from presiding over this matter

. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 903(C) ( in the context

of ongoing PCRA proceedings, a jurist may opt to remove himself or herself from

presiding over the matter “in the interests of justice”).

In all other respects, Petitioner’s requests for relief are DEN IED.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.

Justice Dougherty did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
###### Editorial Note on Part 365

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 365 appear at 66 FR 49870, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 365.104 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 365

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 365 appear at 66 FR 49870, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 365.401 Scope of rules.

The rules in this subpart define the procedures for motor carriers, property brokers, and freight forwarders to report to FMCSA transactions that result in the transfer of operating authority and are not subject to approval by the U.S. Surface Transportation Board under 49 U.S.C. 14303.

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 88 FR 80179, Nov. 17, 2023, § 365.401 was suspended indefinitely, effective Nov. 17, 2023.
§ 29.925 Is a Tribe entitled to a hearing on the record? ( a ) The Department must provide a Tribe with a hearing on the record for a non-immediate termination prior to or in lieu of the corrective action period set forth in the termination notice as described in § 29.802.
( b ) The Department must provide a Tribe with a hearing on the record for an immediate termination. The Department and the Tribe will work together to determine a mutually acceptable time and place for the hearing. The hearing on the record must commence no later than 10 days after the date of such termination or a later date upon mutual agreement. If feasible, the hearing may occur virtually or telephonically. If requested by the Tribe, the Department may arrange for an in-person hearing.
( c ) A Tribe may decline a hearing in writing.
From: Mike Masiello [mailto:mike@masielloretirement.com] 

Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 11:09 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Cc: Mike Masiello

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

WRONG,WRONG,WRONG on so many levels. This doesn't help the smaller investor and actually hurts 

them and most employed people by limiting if not eliminating the chance of getting advice. Based on 

current savings rates and ill-preparedness for retirement you should be doing more to incentivise 

savings not penalizing them!!

Michael A. Masiello

Masiello Retirement Solutions

1081 Long Pond Rd., Ste. 140

Rochester, NY 14626

585-720-0590

585-720-0592 (Fax)

www.masielloretirement.com

Registered representative of and securities and Advisory Services offered through Cetera Advisors LLC, Member 

FINRA, SIPC

Cetera is under separate ownership from any other entity.

Note: 

For Business emails use - mike@masielloretirement.com

For Personal emails use - mmasiello@choiceonemail.com

Confidential: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the 

use of the individual or entity to whom this email is addressed. If you are not one of the named 

recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please 

notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, 

dissemination, forward, printing, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
§ 33.55 Mandatory acceptance of an allocation order. ( a ) Except as otherwise specified in this section, a person shall accept and comply with every allocation order received.
( b ) A person shall not discriminate against an allocation order in any manner such as by charging higher prices for materials, services, or facilities covered by the order or by imposing terms and conditions for contracts and orders involving allocated materials, services, or facilities that differ from the person's terms and conditions for contracts and orders for the materials, services, or facilities prior to receiving the allocation order.
( c ) If a person is unable to comply fully with the required action(s) specified in an allocation order, the person must notify the Department of Transportation immediately, explain the extent to which compliance is possible, and give the reasons why full compliance is not possible. If notification is given verbally, written or electronic confirmation must be provided within five (5) working days. Such notification does not release the person from complying with the order to the fullest extent possible, until the person is notified by the Department of Transportation that the order has been changed or cancelled.
-----Original Message----- 

From: prisca67@yahoo.com [mailto:prisca67@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:26 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

prisca learmann 

5853 w. alder ave. 

littleton, CO 80128