alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 13, 1995 (114), Para 114.9 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 1162]
[Pages 1334-1335]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.114.9  providing for the consideration of h.r. 1162

  Mr. GOSS, by direction of the Committee on Rules, called up the 
following resolution (H. Res. 218):

       Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 
     resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule 
     XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 
     Whole House on the State of the Union for consideration of 
     the bill (H.R. 1162) to establish a Deficit Reduction Trust 
     Fund and pro

[[Page 1335]]

     vide for the downward adjustment of discretionary spending 
     limits in appropriation bills. The first reading of the bill 
     shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to 
     the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
     controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
     Committee on Rules. After general debate the bill shall be 
     considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall 
     be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose 
     of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the 
     nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Rules. 
     The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall 
     be considered as read. Points of order against the committee 
     amendment in the nature of a substitute for failure to comply 
     with clause 7 of rule XVI are waived. During consideration of 
     the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the 
     Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 
     whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be 
     printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated 
     for that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments so 
     printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of 
     consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 
     rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 
     may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote 
     in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the 
     Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature 
     of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as 
     ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
     without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with 
     or without instructions.

  When said resolution was considered.
  After debate,
  By unanimous consent, the previous question was ordered on the 
resolution to its adoption or rejection and under the operation thereof, 
the resolution was agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said resolution was agreed to 
was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
```
## NO. 12

- 10

- 00 16 9

- C R

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

NIJINSKI TWON MURPHY

, APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 420 TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, ' NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

MEMORAN DUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by

Appellant and his counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly,

Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

.

P. 42.2 (a).

Opinion delivered October 20 , 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
-----Original Message----- 

From: eja32@drexel.edu [mailto:eja32@drexel.edu] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:23 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

As many know, people who suffer mental illnesses often also suffer from 

misunderstanding and disinterest from the general population; we must 

protect those unfortunate people who must confront the double jeopardy 

of not only public disdain regarding mental ilness but also insurance 

company unfairness. 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Elizabeth Adams-Eilers 

4206 Spruce Street 

Philadelphia, Pa. 19104 

Sincerely, 

Elizabeth Adams-Eilers 

4206 Spruce Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19104
§ 238.13 Preemptive effect. ( a ) Under 49 U.S.C. 20106, issuance of these regulations preempts any State law, regulation, or order covering the same subject matter, except an additional or more stringent law, regulation, or order that is necessary to eliminate or reduce an essentially local safety or security hazard; is not incompatible with a law, regulation, or order of the United States Government; and does not unreasonably burden interstate commerce.
( b ) This part establishes Federal standards of care for railroad passenger equipment. This part does not preempt an action under State law seeking damages for personal injury, death, or property damage alleging that a party has failed to comply with the Federal standard of care established by this part, including a plan or program required by this part. Provisions of a plan or program that exceed the requirements of this part are not included in the Federal standard of care.
( c ) Under 49 U.S.C. 20701-20703 (formerly the Locomotive (Boiler) Inspection Act), the field of locomotive safety is preempted, extending to the design, the construction, and the material of every part of the locomotive and tender and all appurtenances thereof. To the extent that the regulations in this part establish requirements affecting locomotive safety, the scope of preemption is provided by 49 U.S.C. 20701-20703.
[75 FR 1227, Jan. 8, 2010]
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 844 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 844

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to provide that annuities 
 paid by States to blind veterans shall be disregarded in determining 
                 supplemental security income benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2001

Mr. Reynolds (for himself, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Serrano, Mr. LaFalce, Mrs. 
Kelly, Mr. Towns, Mr. Sweeney, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Meeks of New York, Mr. 
Quinn, Mr. Houghton, Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Grucci, Mrs. Lowey, 
 Mr. McHugh, Mr. Gilman, Mr. Fossella, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Engel, and Ms. 
  Slaughter) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to provide that annuities 
 paid by States to blind veterans shall be disregarded in determining 
                 supplemental security income benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STATE ANNUITIES FOR BLIND VETERANS TO BE DISREGARDED IN 
              DETERMINING SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME BENEFITS.

    (a) Income Disregard.--Section 1612(b) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1382a(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (21);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (22) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(23) any annuity paid by a State to the individual (or 
        such spouse) on the basis of the individual being a veteran (as 
        defined in section 101 of title 38, United States Code) who is 
        blind.''.
    (b) Resource Disregard.--Section 1613(a) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
1382b(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (12);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (13) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (13) the following:
            ``(14) for the month of receipt and every month thereafter, 
        any annuity paid by a State to the individual (or such spouse) 
        on the basis of the individual being a veteran (as defined in 
        section 101 of title 38, United States Code) who is blind.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to benefits paid for months beginning after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 236.408 Route locking.

Route locking shall be provided where switches are power-operated. Route locking shall be effective when the first pair of wheels of a locomotive or car passes a point not more than 13 feet in advance of the signal governing its movement, measured from the center of the signal mast or, if there is no mast, from the center of the signal.

[49 FR 3386, Jan. 26, 1984]
#### § 38.177 Ferries, excursion boats and other vessels. [Reserved]
#### § 29.104 Must the Department and a Tribe follow a specific process when negotiating compacts, funding agreements, and amendments?

The Department and a Tribe do not have to follow a specific process when negotiating compacts, funding agreements, and amendments. The Department and the Tribe should cooperate to develop a plan to address each issue subject to negotiation and provide the representatives an opportunity to address the Tribal proposals, legal or program issues of concern, the time needed to complete the negotiations, and the development of a term sheet.
-----Original Message-----

From: Cedric [mailto:ced264u@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2015 3:45 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN-1201-AB32

I think it would be very good to implement the fiduciary requirement!!! We small investors need all the 

protection we can get.

Thank You 

Sent from my iPad
#### § 236.509 Two or more locomotives coupled.

The automatic train stop, train control or cab signal apparatus shall be arranged so that when two or more locomotives are coupled, or a pushing or helping locomotive is used, it can be made operative only on the locomotive from which the brakes are controlled.
Term Sheet Regarding Executive Compenstion Adjustment




 Exhibit 10.10 
 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TERM SHEET 
 The Compensation Committee for Vision Bancshares, Inc. met on
January 11, 2005, unanimously making the following recommendations which were approved by the Company’s Board of Directors at its regular meeting on January 31, 2005: J. Daniel Sizemore, Chairman and CEO, received a salary increase of
$36,500 for a total annual compensation of $275,000 and William E. Blackmon, CFO received a salary increase of $10,000 for a total annual compensation of $131,900. Robert S. McKean, President, Vision Bank (Alabama), received a one time bonus in the
amount of $16,700 in lieu of an annual salary increase. 
 Incentive bonuses were approved for the following executive officers of the
Company and its subsidiaries: J. Daniel Sizemore, Chairman and CEO, $78,705; William E. Blackmon, CFO, $40,227; Robert S. McKean, President, Vision Bank (Alabama), $45,375; and Joey W. Ginn, President, Vision Bank (Florida), $17,025. 
 Stock options were granted, effective January 31, 2005, under the Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan to the following executive officers of
Company and its subsidiaries: J. Daniel Sizemore, Chairman and CEO, was granted 4,000 shares; William E. Blackmon, CFO, was granted 2,500 shares; Robert S. McKean, President, Vision Bank (Alabama), was granted 2,500 shares; and Joey W. Ginn,
President, Vision Bank (Florida), was granted 2,500 shares. These options were granted at a strike price of $27.75 per share, were 100% vested at the date of grant and expire ten years from the date of grant. 
 Stock options were granted, effective January 31, 2005, under the Director Stock Option Plan. Each non-employee director of Vision Bancshares, Inc.
was granted 2,500 shares. These options were granted at a strike price.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  registration  statement of
CMP Group, Inc. and Central Maine Power Company on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-35235;
333-56939;  33-36679; 33-39826; 333-49677; and 33-51511) and Form S-8 (File Nos.
333-49643  and 33-44754) of our reports dated January 27, 2000, on our audits of
the consolidated financial statements of CMP Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries as
of  Dcember  31,  1999 and 1998,  and for each of the three  years in the period
ended December 31, 1999, and the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement  schedule of Central  Maine Power Company and its  subsidiaries  as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998,  and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1999, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Portland, Maine
March 17, 2000
**Exhibit 31.3****CEO CERTIFICATIONS**I, W. Douglas Parker, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of America West Airlines, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: July 26, 2007/s/ W. Douglas Parker
Exhibit 35.1


COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


OF


OHIO EDISON COMPANY, AS SERVICER


The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the duly elected and acting Vice President and Treasurer of Ohio Edison Company, as servicer (the “ Servicer ”) under the Phase-In-Recovery Property Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2013 (the “ Servicing Agreement ”), between the Servicer and OE Funding LLC, as Bond Issuer, and further certifies on behalf of the Servicer that:


1. A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement during the period that commenced January 1, 2023 and ended December 31, 2023 has been made under the supervision of the undersigned pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Servicing Agreement; and


2. To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Servicing Agreement throughout the period that commenced January 1, 2023 and ended December 31, 2023.


Executed as of this 29th day of March 2024.





OHIO EDISON COMPANYBy:/s/ Steven R. StaubName:Steven R. StaubTitle:Vice President and Treasurer
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 85

To reauthorize the Trade Adjustment Assistance program through fiscal year

2006, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. ENGLISH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To reauthorize the Trade Adjustment Assistance program

through fiscal year 2006, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF TRADE ADJUSTMENT

4 ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

5 (a) ASSISTANCE FOR WORKERS.—Section 245 of the

6 Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2317) is amended by strik7 ing ‘‘the period beginning October 1, 1998, and ending

8 September 30, 2001,’’ each place it appears and inserting

9 ‘‘each of fiscal years 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and

10 2006’’.
2

•HR 85 IH

1 (b) ASSISTANCE FOR FIRMS.—Section 256(b) of the

2 Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2346(b)) is amended by

3 striking ‘‘for the period beginning October 1, 1998, and

4 ending September 30, 2001’’ and inserting ‘‘for each of

5 fiscal years 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006’’.

6 (c) TERMINATION.—Section 285(c) of the Trade Act

7 of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2771 note) is amended in paragraphs

8 (1) and (2)(A) by striking ‘‘September 30, 2001’’ and in9 serting ‘‘September 30, 2006’’.

10 (d) TRAINING LIMITATION.—Section 250(d)(2) of

11 the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2330(d)(2)) is amended

12 by striking ‘‘for the period’’ and all that follows through

13 ‘‘September 30, 2001,’’.

14 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING PETITIONS FOR

15 WORKER ASSISTANCE.

16 Section 223(b)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19

17 U.S.C. 2273(b)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘one year’’ and

18 inserting ‘‘two years’’.

Æ
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOSEPH LUSHINGTON GARRELL, )

DOC #T49977 )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4109

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed December 19, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Chet A. Tharpe, 

Judge.

Joseph Lushington Garrell, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
1

Robert M. Serino 

FAA Private Pilot Certificate Number 33442220 

PIC Flight Log Extract for Small UAS 

 Date Aircraft Take-Offs/Landings Flight Time (Hours) 

8 June 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 6 2 

14 June 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 8 3 

15 June 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 1 

29 June 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 1 

4 July 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 1 

6 July 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 6 2 

12 July 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 1 

13 July 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 4 1 

20 July 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 6 2 

26 July 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 1 

3 August 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 4 2 

10 August 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 1 

17 August 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 8 3 

23 August 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 1 

24 August 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 6 2 

30 August 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 1 

6 September 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 5 1 

7 September 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 1 

13 September 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 1 

14 September 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 1 

20 September 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 002 6 3 

21 September 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 002 3 1 

27 September 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 8 2 

1 October 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 002 4 2 

4 October 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 2 

4 October 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 002 3 2 

12 October 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 6 2 

19 October 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 8 3 

25 October 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 002 6 2 

26 October 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 002 3 1 

1 November 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 1 

2 November 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 6 2 

8 November 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 002 3 1 

9 November 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 1 

15 November 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 6 2 

22 November 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 6 2 

1 December 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 1 

14 December 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 1 

21 December 2014 DJI Phantom 2 - 002 3 1 

1 January 2015 DJI Phantom 2 - 002 3 1 

4 January 2015 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 1 

10 January 2015 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 1 

11 January 2015 DJI Phantom 2 - 002 3 1 

17 January 2015 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 3 1 

18 January 2015 DJI Phantom 2 - 002 4 1 

25 January 2015 DJI Phantom 2 - 001/2 3 1 

8 February 2015 DJI Phantom 2 - 001 5 1

Total as of 8 February 2015 199 69 

DJI Phantom 2 - 001 = GoPro FPV and Recorder // DJI Phantom 2 - 002 = FLIR FPV and Recorder
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6682

BO ANDERSON TAYLOR, a/k/a Bo A. Taylor, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Horry County 

DSS, 

 Defendant – Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (4:09-cv-00455-HMH) 

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: July 1, 2009 

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Bo Anderson Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Bo Anderson Taylor appeals the district court’s order 

adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and 

dismissing Anderson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Taylor v. South Carolina Dep’t of Soc. Serv., No. 4:09-

cv-00455-HMH (D.S.C. Mar. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
§ 29.930 May the Department or the Tribe appeal the decision of an administrative law judge? ( a ) The decision of an administrative law judge is a recommended decision that the Department or the Tribe may appeal to the Secretary.
( b ) The decision of an administrative law judge becomes the final decision of the Secretary 60 days after it is served on the Department and the Tribe unless a petition for review is filed in accordance with § 29.931. The decision of the Secretary is a final agency action that the Tribe may appeal to the U.S. District Courts.