alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: friend2bud@aol.com [mailto:friend2bud@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:38 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Keith Rosen 

P. O. Box 262404 

Houston, TX 77207
##### 



AMERICA WEST AIRLINES, INC.
March 31, 2003

Exhibit 99.2

CFO CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, W. Douglas
Parker, the Chief Executive Officer of America West Airlines, Inc. (the
Company), and Derek J. Kerr, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:

1.The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2003, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.2 (the
Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

In Witness Whereof,the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the
23rd day of April, 2003.

| |  |                         |  |                        
| |  | ----------------------- |  | -----------------------
| |  |                         |  | /s/ W. Douglas Parker  
| |  |                         |  |                        
| |  |                         |  |                        
| |  |                         |  | W. Douglas Parker      
| |  |                         |  |                        
| |  | Chief Executive Officer |  |                        
| |  |                         |  | /s/ Derek J. Kerr      
| |  |                         |  |                        
| |  |                         |  |                        
| |  |                         |  | Derek J. Kerr          
| |  |                         |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to America West Airlines, Inc. and will be retained by America West
Airlines, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the
date of the Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.)
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.335 Chemical under pressure n.o.s. ( a ) *General requirements.* A cylinder filled with a chemical under pressure must be offered for transportation in accordance with the requirements of this section and § 173.301 (except for the cylinder valve cap requirements in §§ 173.301(a)(11) and (12)). In addition, a DOT specification cylinder must meet the requirements in §§ 173.301a, 173.302, 173.302a, and 173.305, as applicable. UN pressure receptacles must meet the requirements in §§ 173.301b, 173.302b, and 173.304b, as applicable. Where more than one section applies to a cylinder, the most restrictive requirements must be followed.
( b ) *Filling limits.* Cylinders must be filled so that at 50 °C (122 °F) the non-gaseous phase does not exceed 95% of their water capacity and they are not completely filled at 60 °C (140 °F). When filled, the internal pressure at 65 °C (149 °F) must not exceed the test pressure of the cylinder. The vapor pressures and volumetric expansion of all substances in the cylinders must be taken into account.
( c ) *Minimum service pressure.* The minimum service pressure must be in accordance with the design specifications of part 178 of this subchapter for the propellant. In any case the minimum test pressure must not be less than 20 bar.
( d ) *Periodic inspection.* ( 1 ) Except as specified in (d)(2) of this section, the maximum requalification test period for cylinders transporting chemical under pressure n.o.s. is 5 years.
( 2 ) For cylinders with maximum capacity of 450 L or less and filled with materials used as fire extinguishing agents, the maximum requalification test period is 10 years.
[78 FR 1092, Jan. 7, 2013, as amended at 82 FR 15891, Mar. 30, 2017; 83 FR 55810, Nov. 7, 2018; 85 FR 83401, Dec. 21, 2020; 87 FR 44997, July 26, 2022]
§ 372.237 Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, and Willacy Counties, TX. ( a ) Transportation within a zone comprised of Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, and Willacy Counties, TX, by motor carriers of property, in interstate or foreign commerce, not under common control, management, or arrangement for shipment to or from points beyond such zone, is partially exempt from regulation under 49 U.S.C. 13506(b)(1).
( b ) To the extent that commercial zones of municipalities within the four counties (as determined under § 372.241) extend beyond the boundaries of this four-county zone, the areas of such commercial zones shall be considered to be part of the zone and partially exempt from regulation under 49 U.S.C. 13506(b)(1).
[51 FR 1815, Jan. 15, 1986. Redesignated at 55 FR 42198, Oct. 18, 1990, as amended at 62 FR 15422, Apr. 1, 1997]
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 155 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 37
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 155

                          [Report No. 107-86]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1699) to authorize 
        appropriations for the Coast Guard for fiscal year 2002.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2001

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1699) to authorize 
        appropriations for the Coast Guard for fiscal year 2002.

    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution 
the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the 
House resolved into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of 
the Union for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1699) to authorize 
appropriations for the Coast Guard for fiscal year 2002. The first 
reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure. After general debate the bill 
shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill 
shall be considered as read. No amendment to the bill shall be in order 
except those printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII and except pro 
forma amendments for the purpose of debate. Each amendment so printed 
may be offered only by the Member who caused it to be printed or his 
designee and shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and 
report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 
adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2. House Resolutions 130, 147, 149, and 150 are laid on the 
table.

                                                  House Calendar No. 37

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 155

                          [Report No. 107-86]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1699) to authorize 
        appropriations for the Coast Guard for fiscal year 2002.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 5, 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

Department of the Interior, National Park Service.

# ACTION:

Notice and request for comments. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and 5 CFR Part 1320, Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements, the National Park Service (NPS) invites public comments on a proposed new collection of information (OMB# 1024-xxxx). The 30-Day                         **Federal Register**                         Notice for this collection of information was published on August 28, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 166, Pages 49303-49305). There are a few corrections that need to be added to the previous publication of this                         **Federal Register**                         Notice. Under the heading Estimated average number of respondents, the words that should be added at the end are “and 4750 non-respondents”. Under the heading Estimated average number of responses, the answer should be: 8,794 responses (4,044 respondents and 4,750 non-respondents). Under the heading Estimated average time burden per respondent, the information that should be added should read “Non-respondents: 1 minute/respondent”. Under the heading Estimated total annual reporting burden, the information should be 1,144 hours. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Leonard E. Stowe, NPS, Information Collection Clearance Office, 1849 C St., NW., (2605), Washington, DC 20240; or via fax at 202/371-1427; or via e-mail at                         *leonard_stowe@nps.gov*.                    

Dated: August 30, 2007.

Leonard E. Stowe,

NPS, Information Collection Clearance Office.

[FR Doc. 07-4413  Filed 9-7-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312-52-M
Editorial Note on Part 365
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 365 appear at 66 FR 49870, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 365.503 Application. ( a ) Each applicant applying under this subpart must submit an application that consists of: ( 1 ) Form OP-1 (MX)—Application to Register Mexican Carriers for Motor Carrier Authority To Operate Beyond U.S. Municipalities and Commercial Zones on the U.S.-Mexico Border;
( 2 ) Form MCS-150—Motor Carrier Identification Report; and
( 3 ) A notification of the means used to designate process agents, either by submission in the application package of Form BOC-3—Designation of Agents-Motor Carriers, Brokers and Freight Forwarders or a letter stating that the applicant will use a process agent service that will submit the Form BOC-3 electronically.
( b ) The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) will only process your application if it meets the following conditions: ( 1 ) The application must be completed in English;
( 2 ) The information supplied must be accurate, complete, and include all required supporting documents and applicable certifications in accordance with the instructions to Form OP-1 (MX), Form MCS-150, and Form BOC-3;
( 3 ) The application must include the filing fee payable to the FMCSA in the amount set forth at 49 CFR 360.3(f)(1); and
( 4 ) The application must be signed by the applicant.
( c ) You must submit the application to the address provided in Form OP-1(MX).
( d ) You may obtain the application forms from any FMCSA Division Office or download them from the FMCSA website at: *https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/mission/forms .*
[67 FR 12714, Mar. 19, 2002, as amended at 80 FR 59071, Oct. 1, 2015; 88 FR 80179, Nov. 17, 2023]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0976.html[7/21/2015 7:10:56 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-5eof

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0976

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I can control my own retirement thank you
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Michael E. Ricketson, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PAB Bankshares, Inc; 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
 4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 
 a.)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
 b.)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
 c.)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 
 5.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
 a.)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
 b.)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: ***August 9, 2004***
By:
***/s/ Michael E. Ricketson***Michael E. Ricketson
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer of the registrant)  - 24 -
## Appendix 8A

MassDEP 2011 Mobile Source Emissions Proj ections - Methodology and Calculation

The methodology for developing the 2009 projecte d emissions is discussed in Section 9, Transportation Conformity. As noted

, the Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation and Public Works, Office of Transportation and Plan ning (EOT), used a recently updated version of the Massachusetts Statewide Travel Demand M odel (TDM) to estimate daily vehicle miles traveled (DVMT) and vehicle speeds. Estimated emissions for 2009 are based on TDM runs performed by EOT using Mobile 6.2 emissions factors provided by MassDEP

Due to EOT staff resource constraints, the 2011 contingency projections are not based on an updated TDM run. Rather, MassDEP used data fr om an earlier TDM to project 2011 emissions. MassDEP took 2009 data generated from the prior ve rsion of the TDM and compared this data to the results of the updated TDM. It used the differences in the two-modeled outcomes to create a ratio to adjust 2011 projections as shown below.

MassDEP Calculation of 2011 On-R oad Mobile Projections

2009 Conformity Budget using latest TDM DEP 2009 estimates using prior version of TDM DIFF % DIFF DEP 2011 Emissions estimates using prior TDM DEP Adjusted 2011 estimates EMA DVMT (000s) 135,657 138,007 -2350 -1.7% WMA DVMT (000s) 24,838 26,293 -1455 -5.5% STATE DVMT (000s) 160,495 164,300 -3805 -2.3%
EMA VOC* 63.50 61.90 -1.60 -2.6% 51.22 52.54
EMA NOX* 188.70 13.74 7.3% 142.46 132.09
WMA VOC 10.73 11.90 1.17 9.8% 9.82 8.85
WMA NOX 27.73 35.40 7.67 21.7% 26.72 20.93
STATE VOC 74.23 73.80 -0.43 -0.6% 61.04 61.40
STATE NOX 202.69 224.10 21.41 9.6% 169.18 153.02

ks/inv2002-sip-rfp nov/29-2007/ mhd- dep-vmt-diff2 *VOC and NOx are in tons per summer day.
#### § 213.349 Rail end mismatch.

Any mismatch of rails at joints may not be more than that prescribed by the following table—

| Class of track | Any mismatch of rails at joints may not be more than the following— | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| On the tread of the rail ends (inch) | On the gage side of the rail ends (inch) |
| Class 6, 7, 8 and 9 | 1/8 | 1/8 |
Editorial Note on Part 381
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 381 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 381.500 What are the general requirements the agency must satisfy in conducting a pilot program? ( a ) The FMCSA may conduct pilot programs to evaluate alternatives to regulations, or innovative approaches, concerning motor carrier, CMV, and driver safety.
( b ) Pilot programs may include exemptions from the regulations listed in § 381.400(f) of this part.
( c ) Pilot programs must, at a minimum, include all of the program elements listed in § 381.505.
( d ) The FMCSA will publish a detailed description of each pilot program, including the exemptions to be considered, and provide notice and an opportunity for public comment before the effective date of the pilot program.
[63 FR 67608, Dec. 8, 1998, as amended at 78 FR 60231, Oct. 1, 2013]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davi s, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

____________________ _____________________ Clerk July 24, 2012

d0716 

# Order

July 24, 2012

144964

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144964

COA: 302421

Saginaw CC: 09

- 032924

- FH

BENNIE MARCOS OLIVER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court , the application for leave to appeal the February 28, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 240.403 Petition requirements. ( a ) To obtain review of a railroad's decision to deny certification, deny recertification, or revoke certification, a person shall file a petition for review that complies with this section.
( b ) Each petition shall: ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) Be filed with the Docket Clerk, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations (M-30), West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. The form of such request may be in written or electronic form consistent with the standards and requirements established by the Federal Docket Management System and posted on its website at *http://www.regulations.gov ;*
( 3 ) Contain all available information that the person thinks supports the person's belief that the railroad acted improperly, including: ( i ) The petitioner's full name;
( ii ) The petitioner's current mailing address;
( iii ) The petitioner's daytime telephone number;
( iv ) The petitioner's email address (if available);
( v ) The name and address of the railroad; and
( vi ) The facts that the petitioner believes constitute the improper action by the railroad, specifying the locations, dates, and identities of all persons who were present or involved in the railroad's actions (to the degree known by the petitioner);
( 4 ) Explain the nature of the remedial action sought;
( 5 ) Be supplemented by a copy of all written documents in the petitioner's possession or reasonably available to the petitioner that document that railroad's decision;
( 6 ) Be filed in a timely manner; and
( 7 ) Be supplemented, if requested by the Operating Crew Review Board, with a copy of the information under 49 CFR 40.329 that laboratories, medical review officers, and other service agents are required to release to employees. The petitioner must provide written explanation in response to an Operating Crew Review Board request if written documents that should be reasonably available to the petitioner are not supplied.
( c ) A petition seeking review of a railroad's decision to deny certification or recertification or revoke certification in accordance with the procedures required by § 240.307 filed with FRA more than 120 days after the date the railroad's denial or revocation decision was served on the petitioner will be denied as untimely except that the Operating Crew Review Board for cause shown may extend the petition filing period at any time in its discretion: ( 1 ) Provided that the request for extension is filed before the expiration of the period provided in this paragraph (c); or
( 2 ) Provided that the failure to file timely was the result of excusable neglect.
( d ) A party aggrieved by a Board decision to deny a petition as untimely or not in compliance with the requirements of this section may file an appeal with the Administrator in accordance with § 240.411.
[56 FR 28254, June 19, 1991, as amended at 64 FR 60995, Nov. 8, 1999; 64 FR 70196, Dec. 16, 1999; 74 FR 25175, May 27, 2009; 85 FR 81318, Dec. 15, 2020]