CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

– Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District

Rule No(s): 1119 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Rescinded January 18, 2011

Rule Title(s): Petroleum Coke Calcining Operations

- Oxides Of Sulfur

Date Submitted to ARB: 03/10/11

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): Adopted 03/02 /79

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Tracy Walters Phone Number: (760) 245

- 1661 x6 122 E

- mail Address: twalters @mdaqmd.ca.gov

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Rule 1119 was resci nded because there are no sources within the jurisd iction of the Antelope Valley Air Quality

Management District (AVAQMD) subject to the provisions of the rule. The proposed action also adopts a Federal

Negative Declaration for Rule 1119 since there are currently none of these sources within the AVAQMD.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach refere nce(s) for emission

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emi ssion information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: N/A

Inven tory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: N/A Area Affected: N/A

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/ AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: N/A

Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A %

Num ber of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: N/A Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) N/A of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: N/A

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): N/A Work Practice Standards in Section(s): N/A

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): N/A Reporting Requirements in Section(s): N/A5/1/2002 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RF P Impacts attainment

Discussion: Rescinding a rule for which there are no sources, therefore there is no air quality impact.