alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 260.51 Conditions of guarantee. ( a ) The percentage of the obligation for which Applicant seeks a guarantee is a matter of negotiation between the Lender and the Applicant, subject to the Administrator's approval. The maximum percentage of the total obligation that the Administrator will guarantee is 80 percent. The amount of guarantee allowed will depend on the total credit quality of the transaction and the level of risk believed to be assumed by the Administrator.
( b ) A guarantee under this part constitutes an obligation supported by the full faith and credit of the United States and is incontestable except for fraud or misrepresentation of which a Lender or Holder has actual knowledge at the time it becomes such Lender or Holder or which a Lender or Holder participates in or condones. In addition, the guarantee will be unenforceable by the Lender or the Holder to the extent any loss is occasioned by the violation of usury laws, negligent servicing, or failure to obtain the required security regardless of the time at which the Administrator acquires knowledge thereof. Any losses occasioned will be unenforceable to the extent that loan funds are used for purposes other than those specifically approved by FRA in its guarantee.
( c ) The Administrator may guarantee an Applicant's obligation to any Lender provided such Lender can establish to the satisfaction of the Administrator that it has the legal authority and sufficient expertise and financial strength to operate a successful lending program. Loan guarantees will only be approved for Lenders with adequate experience and expertise to make, secure, service, and collect the loans.
( d ) The Lender may sell all of the guaranteed portion of the loan on the secondary market, provided the loan is not in default, or retain the entire loan.
( e ) When a guaranteed portion of a loan is sold to a Holder, the Holder shall succeed to all rights of the Lender under the loan guarantee to the extent of the portion purchased. The Lender will remain bound to all obligations under the loan guarantee and the provisions of this part. In the event of material fraud, negligence or misrepresentation by the Lender or the Lender's participation in or condoning of such material fraud, negligence or misrepresentation, the Lender will be liable for payments made by the Agency to any Holder.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 17, 1995 (95), Para 95.9 After Recess--4:04 P.M.]
[Page 1136]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.95.9  after recess--4:04 p.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, called the House to order.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      13(a)(vii)

                                                   [A WORLD OF OPPORTUNITY LOGO]

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
CLARCOR Inc.
Rockford, Illinois

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders' equity and cash flows present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of CLARCOR
Inc. and its subsidiaries at November 30, 2003 and November 30, 2002 and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended November 30, 2003, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note A to the consolidated financial statements, effective
December 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets."

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Chicago, Illinois
January 8, 2004
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                  ------------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Manfred F. Dyck, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Hydromer, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the six months ended December 31,
2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Hydromer, Inc.



Date: February 8, 2007               By: /s/ Manfred F. Dyck
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Manfred F. Dyck
                                         Chairman, President and Chief Executive
                                         Officer

                                       11
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 178 (Friday, September 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52554-52555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4555]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Program Subcommittee

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C., App. 2), announcement is made of the following 
Committee meeting:
    Name of Committee: Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Program 
Subcommittee.
    Dates of Meeting: October 16, 2007.
    Location: Marriott Crystal City at Reagan National Airport, 1999 
Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.
    Time: 0730-1700 hours, October 16, 2007.
    Proposed Agenda: Review and discuss the Army's Cultural and

[[Page 52555]]

Language Initiatives for the Army Officer Education System, focusing on 
cultural and language commissioning requirements for Army ROTC. Other 
topics will include studies on future demographic populations and the 
challenges facing Reserve Officers' Training Corps Cadets due to the 
lack of full tuition and room and board scholarships.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Major Tracy Porter, U.S. Army Cadet 
Command (ATCC-TR), Fort Monroe, VA 23651 at (757) 788-4646.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting is open to the public. 
Interested persons may attend, appear before, or file statements with 
the committee. If a written statement is not received at least 10 
calendar days prior to the meeting, which is the subject of this 
notice, then it may not be provided to or considered by the Reserve 
Officers' Training Corps Subcommittee until its next meeting.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-4555 Filed 09-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 223

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit

contributions by nonparty multicandidate political committees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. DICKEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

prohibit contributions by nonparty multicandidate political committees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF CONTRIBUTIONS BY

4 NONPARTY MULTICANDIDATE POLITICAL

5 COMMITTEES IN ELECTIONS FOR FEDERAL

6 OFFICE.

7 Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act

8 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a) is amended by adding at the end

9 the following new subsection:
2

•HR 223 IH

1 ‘‘(i)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this

2 Act, no nonparty multicandidate political committee may

3 make any contribution to a candidate for Federal office.

4 ‘‘(2) As used in this subsection, the term

5 ‘multicandidate political committee’ has the meaning given

6 that term in subsection (a)(4).’’.

Æ
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2424

For the relief of James M. Hughs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1995

Mr. ROSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of James M. Hughs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT TO TREATMENT AS UNITED

4 STATES ARMY CAPTAIN.

5 For all purposes, James M. Hughs of Fayetteville,

6 North Carolina, shall be treated as having retired from

7 the United States Army as a captain (grade 0–3).

8 SEC. 2. ENTITLEMENT TO BACK PAY.

9 The Secretary of the Army shall pay a lump sum to

10 James M. Hughs, which shall be the difference between

11 the amount that should have been paid to him if he were

12 a captain and the amount actually paid to him, for the
2

•HR 2424 IH

1 period beginning on May 31, 1971, and ending on the last

2 day of the month in which this Act is enacted.

Æ
#### § 29.502 Who is responsible for compiling, copying, and paying for materials for any audit or examination?

The agency or entity undertaking the examination or audit will be responsible for all costs associated with an audit or examination of Tribal records. A Tribe is responsible for making records available during regular business hours, and may prevent removal of the records from Tribal offices. If an agency or entity undertaking the examination or audit requests that the Tribe make copies of records for its use, the Tribe must do so, but may charge the examining agency reasonable per-page fees for photocopying or scanning of documents and records.
[Civ. No. 801.

Second Appellate District.

January 28, 1913.]

#### THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, Appellant, v. FRANK H. SMITH et al., Respondents.

Public Officers—Premium on Bonds Furnished by Surety Com- ' pañíes—Constitutionality of Statute.—The act approved March 25, 1903, providing for the payment by the state or counties, or cities and counties, of the premium or charges on official bonds when given by surety companies, is held constitutional and valid, upon the authority of *County of San Luis Obispo*v. *Murphy,*162 Cal. 588.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. E. P. Unangst, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Albert Nelson, District Attorney, for Appellant.

Paul M. Gregg, C. P. Kaetzel, and A. E. Campbell, for Respondents.

THE COURT.

No briefs have been filed herein. It appears, however, by a stipulation filed in this court on July 28, 1910, that the point involved, to wit: the constitutionality of an act of the legislature of the state of California entitled “An act to provide for the payment by the state, or counties, or cities, or cities and counties, of the premium or charge on official bonds when given by surety companies, ’ ’ approved March 25, 1903, [Stats. 1903, p. 476], is identical with the question presented in *County of San Luis Obispo*v. *Murphy,*162 Cal. 588, [123 Pac. 808], wherein, by an opinion *56of the supreme court filed April 11, 1912, the said act was declared constitutional and valid. Upon the authority of that case and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed.
Exhibit 4





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul O. Richins, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Paul O. Richins


Paul O. Richins


May 10, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Robert Lyman, *Respondent, v.*Louisa Royce and others, *Administrators, Appellants.*

— Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, costs to abide event, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce the judgment $334.89 and any -interest allowed thereon, in which case the judgment as so modified is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David H. Gill, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David H. GillDavid H. Gill, President and CEO(Principal Executive Officer)




/s/ David H. GillDavid H. Gill, Acting CFO(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


November 17, 2009
BASF ~2cm-os3/ 

The Chemical Company 

March 9, 2011 

Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M) 

EPA OPPT/TSCA section 4 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 

Washington, DC 20460-0001 

Re: 40 CFR 799.5087 

Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 

RECEIVED 

I I MAR ! n PN !2 : 42 

FEDEX 7968 4755 8369 

~mpH0 npiuiWiiumi~iupiup~i 

Application for Exemption From Testing Requirements 

68187-76-8 Castor oil, sulfated, sodium salt 

Dear Sir/Madam, 

This letter serves as an Application for Exemption from testing requirements, in compliance with 40 

CFR 790.80-790.82 and 40 CFR 799.5087. 

Test Rule Identification : 40 CFR 799.5087 - Chemical testing 

requirements for second group of certain high 

production volume chemicals (HPV2) 

Firm Seeking Exemption: BASF Corporation 

100 Campus Drive 

Florham Park, NJ 07932 

Contact Person: Diane Pietrzyk 

Sr. Product Regulations Specialist 

Product Regulatory COE 

26701 Telegraph Rd . 

Southfield, MI 48034 

phone 248-948-2154 

email diane.pietrzyk@basf.com 

Substance Identified for Exemption: Castor oil, sulfated, sodium salt 

CASRN: 68187-76-8 

Basis for Exemption : Substance imported solely as part of various 

multi-component mixtures (<50 wt%) . 

BASF Corporation 

100 Campus Drive 

Florham Park, NJ 07932 

Tel: (800) 526-1072 

www.basf.com/usa CONTAINS NO CBI 

Helping Make 

Products Better TM 
BASF - Request for exemption 799.5087 

CAS 68187-76-8 

March 9, 2011 

Page 2 of 2 

BASF Corporation understands that if this application is granted before the reimbursement period 

described in section 4(c)(3)(B) of TSCA expires, BASF Corporation must pay fair and equitable 

reimbursement to the person or persons who incurred or shared in the costs of complying with the 

requirement to submit data and upon whose data the granting of BASF Corporation's application 

was based . 

Should you have questions or concerns, please contact the person noted as the contact above. 

Sincerely, 

BASF Corporation 

Diane M. Pietrzyk 

Sr. Product Regulations Specialist 

Product Regulatory COE 

.~r~~ a nINS NO CBI
From: jihf@live.com [mailto:jihf@live.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 7:53 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

Please, support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support this rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for 

mental health treatment than they would for other physical health care. 

Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care 

coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jackie Feulner 

6038 Owens St. 

Arvada, CO 80004
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 6/18/15 4:16 PM

Received: June 15, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jfz-q6vh

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0317

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Susan Perez

Address: 

2453 Damuth St. #6

Oakland, 94602

Email: susan.ozawa@gmail.com

Phone: 415-900-6157

General Comment

To Whom It May Concern,

As a consumer advocate, I'm supportive of this proposed regulation, the motivation behind it 

and the likely outcomes of its implementation. 

As a financial advisor focused on socially responsible investment, there are a few issues that I'd 

like to raise for possible consideration. 

When the advisor or broker of record is putting together a line-up of funds, selection is certainly 

based on financial performance and management costs, etc, however to offer an additional 

socially responsible set of funds in various investment strategy categories, non-financial factors 

like ESG or SRI screens are taken into consideration. Brokers of record, in the interest of 

serving the clients' best interest, should be able to consider these factors alongside financial and 

management performance of various investments.

An additional area of concern is the relatively new and niche field of impact investment which 

typically involves commission for financial advisors as the funds are not held in the custody of 

Page 1 of 2

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b3a93e&format=xml&show... 6/18/2015
the broker/dealer and therefore clients cannot be charged a fee as a percent of assets under

management. These are important instrument and investments and the field is an important one 

to protect and support to my mind. Due diligence and disclosures are certainly important and I 

believe the language employed in this rule could highlight these mechanisms of investor 

protection without inadvertently prohibiting financial advisors from working in this new and 

important field. 

I have one additional concern regarding clarity in the BIC exemption for managed accounts that 

are being opened or rolled over. It's not clear if the initial sale of this set of fee-based services 

would be considered except or not from the rule. 

Thank you for your consideration of these issues,

Susan Perez

Page 2 of 2

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b3a93e&format=xml&show... 6/18/2015
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0107 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Gene Dominic DiGirolamo 

Address: 

49 East Wing 

P. O. Box 202018 

Harrisburg, PA, 17120-2018 

Email: gdigirol@pahousegop.com 

Phone: 717-783-7319 

Organization: PA House or Representatives 

General Comment 

May 26, 2009 

Alan D. Lebowitz, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Program Operations 

Office of Health Plan Standards and Compliance 

Assistance, Employee Benefits Security Administration 

Room N-5653 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20210 

Attention: MHPAEA Comments 

Dear Mr. Lebowitz, 

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Request for Information 

regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008. 

We in Pennsylvania were very involved in the debate leading to 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 26, 2009 

Received: May 26, 2009 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 809b65ee 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web
enactment of the Federal Parity law. A major part of our involvement concerned 

the importance of securing protection for Pennsylvania’s strong drug and alcohol 

addiction treatment laws. We wanted to ensure that as parity moved forward, no 

harm was done to state laws or provisions of state laws that provide better 

consumer protections. 

After much debate in Congress, the Federal Parity law as enacted, 

clearly saves from pre-emption state laws that are more favorable to consumers. 

Please ensure that the will of Congress in this regard is respected in 

any regulations regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health 

Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008. 

Sincerely, 

Gene DiGirolamo 

State Representative 

18th Legislative District 

GD/ph 

Attachments 

EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0107.1: Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of LKA Gold Incorporated (the "Registrant") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Kye Abraham, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



Dated:  April 17, 2018



            /s/ Kye Abraham

_________________________________________

Kye Abraham

Chief Executive Officer