p. 1 

# OAR Box 1787 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 6 ) ll-A- 6 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/2008 10:22:18 AM

Sheet 6 of 147P. 2

•<"t ? • ' -_ v



# Jun e 1986

Prepare d fo r: Da n d e Roec k Ne wSourc e ReviewSectio n Contro l Program s Developmen t Divisio n U . S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Researc h Triangl e Park , N.C . 2771 1

Prepare d l?

y: Radia n Corporatio n P.O . Box13000 Researc h Triangl e Park , N.C . 2770 9 i-v-vy
- ' • •V.-^i^-V**-'' .

.-.I . v-i-••"•:•• . *• • , * {•'•••rlhyri-.-j.*! . . V!?^ * :••••. • 

### "X-5^r; ; 

### :v -

•Vf^V-;--*.*^- . :•* • •«I-..H^I.;I- 1
- - . . . ' ^•JH^"..TV.';'.'. ' '
• .'•.*c£2S;i- , A'--- ' '

; p.^«^ - :•'•"-'•: • • .••v.^-j...^-'. * •'•.-"•!?*jrAs5-.-f"-' - ' ;p--^rt!f»*!j.>;- . — . • i-M-spj&sir

* ..•ft-jslEI?*;.'.; - •••.^-l•.5VJksf\:'"-! - . *Kj»BSf*.- ! - ••.•'•'•'iv.'V* . ..i . •

^•••ftirT** . .-1""-^^:. . •-. . •'f*?V^B^'6v-:-: - • •',xii!^'.-,v... ' •;$i»IS»HfrW i * • ' . ' : " • ^

•:"•:•.•',•.. •

- .;.-..;,-,tt«j i i.v.\- i - .p.*^Jv|*-*:^ : •

• , . , t

, • , 

# RJ&DIM 1 CORPORATIO N 

# IP. 3 

### y. V 

# n

DCN Nos . 86-203-024-59-1 3 86-203-024-60-1 0 86-203-024-90-0 2 EPA Contrac t No . 68-02-388 9

TH E 198 5 NE

W SOURC E REVIEW

AUDIT : MAJO RFINDING S

DRAF T FINAL REPOR T

Prepare dfor : Da nd e Roec k New Sourc e Review

Sectio n Contro l Program s Developmen t Divisio n U . S . Environmenta l Protectio nAgenc y Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolin a 2771 1

Prepare dby : Radia nCorporatio n 320 0 Eas t Chape l Hil l Road/Progres s Cente r

Pos t Offic e Bo x1300 0 Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolin a 2770 9

Jun e 198 6P. 4

• , V



### LIS T O F TABLE S Tabl e Pag e 1 Permit s inth e 198 5 NS RDat a Bas e 4 | 

### 2 Publi c Notificatio nProcedure s 7 3 Applicabilit y Determination s 1 1 4 BAC T Determination s 1 5 5 BAC T Str i ngenc y Compare dt o NSP S 1 7 6 LAE RStringenc y Compare dt o NSP S 1 9 7 PS DMonitorin g - Agencie s fo r Whic hPreconstructio n Monitorin g wa s Require d2 0 8 PS DIncremen t Analysi s 2 2 9 NAAQ S Protectio n2 5 1 0 Emissio nOffse t Requirement s 2 9 1 1 Permi t Specificit y an dClarit y

3 1P. 5 

# n

INTRODUCTION Thi s repor t contains , i ntabula r form , th e majo r finding s o f th e Ne w Sourc e Revie w

(NSR ) Audi t fo r F

Y1985 . Th e primar y purpos e o f thi s repor t i s t o presen t th e result s o f th e nationa l audi t ona nagency-by-agenc y

basi s s o tha t individua l agencie s an dEP A Regiona l Office s ca nse e ho w eac h agency' s result s wer e factore dint o th e nationa l audit . Thi s repor t should , therefore , b e use di nconjunctio nwit hth e nationa l repor t prepare db y th e EPA (Nationa l Ai r Audi t System F Y198 5 Repor t - EPA-450/2-85-009) . Th e NS RAudi t examine dth e way s tha t Stat e an dloca l agencie s implemen t program s fo r th e preconstructio nrevie w o f new an dmodifie dstationar y sources . Seve nbasi c topic s wer e examined : publi c notificatio nprocedures ; applicabilit y

determinations ; BACT/LAE Rdeterminations ; ambien t monitorin g (PSD) ; ambien t impac t analyses ; emissio noffse t requirements ; an dpermi t specificit y

an dclarity . Th e NS Raudi t considere dinformatio nobtaine dfro m 6 4 Ai r Pollutio n Contro l Agencies : 4 8 State s (no t Hawai i o r California) , th e Distric t o f Columbia , Puert o Rico , Virgi nIslands , an d1 3 loca l governmen t programs . Eac haudite dagenc y

wa s randoml y

assigne da numbe r fro m 0 1 t o 6 4 inorde r t o preven t th e reade r fro m tryin g t o compar e on e agency' s performanc e agains t another . Th e reade r shoul dbe cautione dagains t an y effor t t o scor e o r ran k agencie s i nterm s o f thei r performance . Agencie s receivin g th e same apparen t ratin g ma y

no t be directl y

comparable , becaus e th e numbe r o f audite dpermit s varie s fro m agenc y t o agency . Eac haudite dagenc y

i s t o b e provide dwit hit s ow ncod e number , bu t no t th e cod e number s o f othe r agencies . Also , Regiona l Office s wil l hav e th e cod e number s o f th e agencie s withi nthei r jurisdiction , bu t no t o f agencie s inothe r regions . Thi s repor t shoul dbe use db y EPA Regiona l Office s an d individua l agencie s t o bring abou t improvement s inth e are a o f new sourc e review . Mos t o f th e finding s presente di nTable s 1 throug h1 1 wer e compile d fro m informatio ncontaine dwithi na computerize ddat a bas e o f th e PSD/Par t D an dnon-NSR/PS Dpermi t fil e questionnaire s tha t wer e complete db y EPAP. 6



### auditors . Th e dat a bas e contain s 5 9 PS Dpermits ; 1 3 NS R(Par t D ) permits ; 5 permit s involvin g bot hPS Dan dPar t D ; an

d36 0 non-NSR/PS Dpermits . Thes e permit s represen t 5 6 percen t o f PS Dpermits , 3 1 percen t o f NS R(Par t D ) permits , an

d2 percen t o f non-NSR/PS Dpermit s processe ddurin g th e audi t perio db

y th e 6 4 audite dagencies .P. 7


# KE Y Agenc y Performanc e Excellen t


# i i Poo r 

# o Q

* 

# V

•

a ! 

# Al l permit s complie d Mos t permit s complie d Hal f o fth e permit s complie d i i 

# Mos t permit s di d no t compl y Non e o f th e permit s complie d i 

# Canno t b e determined , lac k o f documentatio n i n fil e N A No t available , questio n

lef t blan k No t applicabl eP. 8



### TABL E 1 . PERMIT S I

NTH E 198 5 NS R DAT

ABAS E Numbe r o f Permit s i

n Dat a Bas e State/Loca l PS D an d Non-NS R AgencyPSD Par t D Par t D PS D Tota l 0 1 3 3 0 2 2 3 5 0 3 1 5 6 0 4 4 4 0 5 2 4 6 0 6 1 1 3 5 0 7 2 2 0 8 1 1 1 1 2 0 9 2 4 6 1 0 6 6 1 1 6 6 1 2 3 3 1 3 2 3 5 1 4 1 1 6 8 1 5 1 1 3 5 1 6 3 5 2 5 3 3 1 7 1 4 1 4 1 8 2 3 5 1 9 4 4 2 0 3 5 8 2 1 1 9 1 0 2 2 1 7 8P. 9



## TABL E 1 . PERMIT S I

N TH E 198 5 NS RDATA

BAS E (Continued ) i 

## Numbe r o f Permit s inDat a Bas e ! _ State/Loca l PS Dan dNon-NS R Agenc y PS DPar t DPar t DPS DTot'a l 2 3 6 6 2 4 4 9 . 13 ' 2 5 1 6 T J 2 6 1 3 4 i 

## 2 7 2 3 ! 5 2 8 1 1 1 1 2 2 9 1 * 1 3 0 3 2 5 i 

## 3 1 1 4 5 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 5 7 3 4 3 If * 3 5 1 1 4 'e i 

## 3 6 3 3 

# i 3 7 5 5 3 8 1 3 [ 4 3 9 5 | 5 4 0 5 | 5 i 

## 4 1 1 0 1 0 4 2 6 ! 

## 6 i 

## 4 3 5 1 5 * 

## Informationwa s no t receive di ntim e t o b e include di

nthe dat a base .

### TABL E 1 . PERMIT S I N TH E 198 5 NS RDATA

BAS E (Continued ) P.1 0



### State/Loca l Agenc y Numbe r o f Permit s i nDat a Bas e 

## PS D Par t D PS D an d Par t D


### 1

1

1

5 Non-NS R



### PS D 4 10 17 10 6 5 6 4 5 5 8 8 4 3 3 9 5 1 6 6 3 36 0 Tot e



### 4 1 1 1 9 1 2 6 5 6 8 5 7 8 1 3 6 4 5 9 5 2 6 6 5 43 7 4 4 4 5 4 6 4 7 4 8 4 9 5 0 5 1 5 2 5 3 5 4 5 5 5 6 5 7 5 8 5 9 6 0 6 1 6 2 6 3 6 4 NATIONA L TOTAL 2

2

4 2 1 2

2 5 9 

## 1

3P.1 1

^ B 

# I Tabl e 2 . Publi c

•State/Loca l •Agenc y 

## 1 0 1

•0

2 

# •^

0 4 

# 1 

# o s 

# 1 *

0 7

" 0

8 | 0

9 

# 1 1 0

1 1


### •1 2 

# 1 1

3


# • 1 4

1 5

•1 6 i
i 

# Notificatio n Procedure

s Majo r Permit

s (PS D an d Par

t D ) Publi c Notificatio n

_ 

# O O

— 

# o o

— 

# o 0

— 

# o

— 

# o 9 0 Q Adequat e Informatio n

^ _ 

# 9 O

— 

# 9 9

— • 

# O

— 

# o

— 

# o 0 9 9

7 . i

Mino r Permit

s j Public 3 Notificatio n
• 

# O
• • • 

# 0 9 9
• • 

# O 

# o o o
• 

# 9 I

Adequat e j Informatio n i

! 

# ' 9 i

_i

i I 

# 9 >

j 

# 9

\ i 

# 9 i

i

— 

# 9 t 

# O 9 9 :

i 

# 9

' i 

# n t

r

-P.1 2



# Tabl e 2 . Publi c Notificatio n Procedures

State/Loca l Agenc y 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 22 2 3 2 4 2 5 26 2 7 28 29 3 0 3 1 3 2 Majo r Permit s (PS D an d Par

t D ) Publi c Notificatio n

, 

# O

— 

# o o o

— 

# o 0 

# o 0
• 

# o o 0 Adequat e

Informatio n

___, 

# 0

— 

# 9 9 9

— 

# 9 O O V v

— 

# O 9 9 Mino r Permit s

Public 3 Notificatio n 

# 0 O O 9
• • • • 

# O 9
• • 

# O 9 9 O Adequat e

Informatio n 

# 9 9 9 9

—

—

—
— 

# 9 9

—

— N A 

# 9 9 9P.1 3

r i • - t

• , 

# n Tabl e 2 . Publi c Notificatio n Procedures

State/Loca l Agenc y 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 6 37 38 39 4 0 4 1 4 2 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 6 4 7 4 8 Majo r Permit s

(PS D an d Par

t D ) Publi c Notificatio n 

# 0 0 O

— 

# O

—
—
—

—
—

— 

# o 9 9 Adequat e

Informatio n 

# 0 0 9

—
— 

# 9

—
—
—

—
—

— 

# O 9 9 • Mino r Permit s Publi c a Notificatio n 

# 9
• 

# 9 O O 9 O O 9
• 

# O
• • • 

# 9 9 Adequat e

Information , 

# 0 |

—, 

# 9 : 9 : 9 9 :

j 

# © i 

# 9 ; 9 j i

—i 

# 9 !

i

_ i

. i

t 

# 9 :P.1 4



# Tabl e 2 . Publi c Notificatio n Procedures

Majo rPermit s (PS D an d Par

t D ) Mino rPermit s State/Loca l Publi cAdequat e Public 3 Adequat e AgencyNotificatio n Informatio n Notificatio n Informatio n 49 

### 5 0 5 1 5 2 5 3 5 4 5 5 5 6 5 7 5 8 5 9 6 0 61 — 

# O

— 

# o

— 

# 0 

# o o o

—

— 

# o — 

# 9

— 

# o

— 

# 9 9 O 9

—

— 

# 9 W 

# 9 0 

# o
• 

# 9

• • • • 

# O

• — 

# 0 9 9

; — 

# 9

—

—

—

— 

# 9

6 2 ——W ' — 6 3 ——W — 

# 9 O 9 O a Man yfinding s wit h blackene d circle s ar e thos e fro m agencie s wit h SI P approve d rule s tha t d o no t contai n a publi cnotificatio n requiremen t fo rmino rsourc e permits . 

### 1 0P.1 5



# Tabl e 3 . Applicability Determination s

State/Loca l Agenc y 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 09 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 Wer e Non-NSR/PS D

File s Correctl y Reviewe d a s Mino r Source s ? 

# 9 O 9 O O 9 O 9 9 9 9 9 O O O O 9 Wer e Al l

Pollutan t - Emittin g Activitie s Addresse d ? 

# 9 O O O O O O O 9 O O O O O O O 9 "Potentia l t o

Emit " Define d Correctly 3 

# O O
• 

# O 

# o
• 

# 0
• • • • • 

# o
• 

# o
• • I

Emissio n Nettin g Problem s

i

-

• • !

? f - 1 I I



### 1 1P.1 6



# Tabl e 3 . Applicability Determination s

State/Loca l Agenc y 1 8 1 9 20 2 1 22 23 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 28 29 3 0 3 1 32 3 3 3 4 Wer e Non-NSR/PS D

File s Correctl y Reviewe d a s Mino r Source s ? 

# 0 9 9 9 9 9 O O 9 O O

— 

# 9 9 O O
• Wer e Al l

Pollutan t - Emittin g Activitie s Addresse d ? 

# O 0 0 9 O O O O 0 O O

— 

# O 9 0 

# o o "Potentia l t o

Emit " Define d Correctly 3 

# 0
• 

# O
• • • •

• 

# m
•

— • 

# o 0
• • Emissio n

Nettin g Problem s

• •

? ?



### 1 2C O



# c 

# o +- » 0 } 

# c 

# E < D
•*»- » 

## Q £_. O J O 

# "5 . Q . < C O J Q O J X I

c c o o |? E c o — © 

### • 2 * 2 E f 2 U J * ^ Q

_
O "gc o
~ c > » C O it . •*- * c o g 

# | | 3

- U J

= • - o

> 2 " 2 ;" •c o —3 = c

o 

# I I I
Q 

### J P> . « * 

### w g -o 

### H Z fc $ 3 2 8 1 O © = G C £ 

# rs

C O C J > . q o

_ i c C O < tf) e^ - o 

# o o • o o • o o o o oooooooooooooooo o 0009000000000000 0

«.8-fe- 8 8S-»9IS?-|!S*53«8 EP.1 8



# Tabl e 3 . Applicability Determination s

State/Loca l Agenc y 52 53 5 4 5 5 5 6 57 58 5 9 60 6 1 62 6 3 6 4 TOTA L NUMBE R O F PERMI TFILE S Wer e Non-NSR/PS D

File s Correctl y Reviewe d a s Mino r Source s ? 

# 9 O 9 9 O O 0 O O O 0 9 O
56 Wer e Al l

Pollutan t - Emittin g Activitie s Addresse d ? 

# 9 O 9 9 O O 0 O O O 9 9 O
2 0 "Potentia l t o

Emit " Define d Correctly 3
• 

# O
• 

# 0 

# o 0 0
• 

# o
• 

# 9
• 

# o Emissio n

Nettin g Problem s

• • •

• •
?

3 Blackene d circle s wer e assigne d t o agencie s tha t ha d permi t file s whic h EP A considere d t o b e deficien t i n som e respec t concernin g th e calculatio n o r us e o f potentia l emission s fo r sourc e applicabilit y purposes . Blackene d circle s wer e assigne d t o agencie s wh o di d no t requir e th e prope r "netting " procedure s t o b e followe d t o calculat e th e change s i n emission s at a modifie d source . 

### 1 4P.1 9

•State/Loca l

Agencie s 0 2

•0

3 

## I 0

5

•0

6 0 8

•0

9 

# 1 • 1

3 1 4

•1 6 

# 1 1

8


# •^

2 2 

## I 2

4 

# 1 2

5 2 6 2 7 

# Tabl e 4 .

BAC TApplied to Eac h Regulated Pollutan t 

# 0

• 

# O O 0 

# o o o o o 9 

# o o o

— 

# o o BAC

TDetermination s Alternativ

e Control s Considere

d 

# 9 O

• • 

# o 9

• 

# 9 O 9 9 O

• 

# o o o 9
1 5 Analyze

d Impact s o fAlternatives

• N A

— N A NA 

# 9

— • 

# O

• • 

# o

— 

# 9 O 

# o NA 1 '



# i f i i i
i 

# i Agenc y Verifies Applicant' s BAC

T i

•; 

# o | O ! O ! O ! 9 :

•! 

# o i o ! 9 i O ! O i " 

# O !

1 

# o 1 

# O :

1 1 N A 

# O ! i i : I

1P.2 0



# Tabl e 4 . BAC

TDetermination s State/Loca l Agencie s 3 0 33 3 4 3 5 4 5 4 6 4 7 5 1 5 3 5 5 5 6 57 5 8 6 4 BAC TApplie d t o

Eac h Regulate d Pollutan t 

# O O 0
• 

# O 

# o
• 

# o o 9 

# o o o o Alternativ e

Control s Considere d 

# 9 0 O O O 0 9 0 O 9 9 O O 

# o Analyze d Impact s

ofAlternative s 

# 0 O 0
• 

# O 0 0 9
• 

# 0
• 

# o o 9 Agenc y Verifie s

Applicant' s BAC T 

# 9 0 O O O O O
• 

# 9 9
• • • 

# 9

1 6TABL E 5 . BAC T STRINGENC YCOMPARED TO NSP S

State/Loca l Agenc y BAC T Equal s NSP S fo r Al l Pollutan t Determination s Mixtur e o f Pollutan t Determination s Wher e Bac t Equal s NSPS , an

dBAC T i s Mor e Stringent tha

nNSP S BAC T i s Mor e Stringent Tha nNSP S fo

r Al l Pollutan t Determination s 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 8 0 9 1 3 1 4 1 6 1 8 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 3 3 4 X X X X X X

X XTABL E 5 . BAC T STRINGENC YCOMPARED T O NSP S (Continued )

State/Loca l Agenc y BAC T Equal s NSP S fo r Al l Pollutan t Determination s Mixtur e of Pollutan t Determination s Wher e Bac t Equal s NSPS , an

dBAC T 1 s Mor e Stringen t tha nNSP S BAC T 1 s Mor e Stringent Tha nNSP S fo

r Al l Pollutan t Determination s

o n 

### 3 5 4 5 4 6 4 7 5 1 53 5 5 5 6 5 8 6 4 X X

X X X

* • • o

### TABL E 6 . LAERSTRINGENC YCOMPARE D T O NSP S

State/Loca l Agenc y Numbe r o f Pollutan t Determination s LAERLAERi s Mor e Equal s NSP S Stringen t Tha nNSP S Numbe r o f Permit s 0 6 0 8 1 4 1 5 1 6 2 1 5 1 TOTAL _2 _ 5 1 1 1
2



# _ L 6 1 1 1 1 2 1 _ 2 _ 9



## 1 9

# Tabl e 7 . PS D Monitorin g -

Agencie s Fo r Whic h Preconstructio n Monitorin g Wa s Require d

t\* > O State Agenc y 0 2 0 6 0 8 1 1 1 3 1 6 1 8 2 0 2 4 3 0 3 3 3 4 Numbe r of

Permit s

2 3 3 2 1 2 Sourc e

Monitorin g Require d Representativ e Dat a Use d (Numbe r of Permits ) (Numbe r of Permits )

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1

1 ? 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 Permit s Usin g Representativ e Dat a

Wa s Basi s fo r Us e i n Permi t Fil e ? 

# O O ? 

# O O
• 

# O 

# o 9 O
• 

# o Doe s th e Applicatio n

Meet al l Criteri a fo r Represenativ

e Dat a ? 

# O O ? 

# O O ? 

# O 9
• 

# O
• 

# 0

# Agencies

Stat e Agenc y 3 5 4 6 4 7 £ 51

5 3 5 5 5 6 5 7 TOTA L

- - - - -- - 

# Tabl e 7 . PS D Monitorin g — * • 

# > Fo r Whic h Preconstructio n Monitorin g Wa s Require d

Sourc e Representativ e Numbe r o

fMonitorin g Required Dat a Use d Permit s (Numbe r o

fPermits ) (Numbe r o

f Permits ) 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 5 0 2 0 1 0 3 4 4

- 1 2 2 1 1 5 2 1 3 0

- - Permits Usin g Representativ e Dat a Wa s Basi s fo r Us e i n Permi t Fil e ?
• 

# O O 

# o o 9 

# o o

- Doe

s th e Applicatio n Mee t al l Criteri a for Represenativ

e Dat a ? ? 

# O O
• 

# O 9 9 O

*

... . . —~ ,

# Tabl e 8 . PS D Incremen t Analysi s Numbe ro f Permit s State/Loca l Wher

e a n Incremen t Problem s I n Determinin g Incremen t Consumptio n TS P Emission s SO , Emission s Agenc yAnalysi s was Performed Majo rSource s Mino rSource s Majo rSource s Mino rSource s

r- o r o 

### 0 2

0 3 0 5 0 6 0 8 0 9 1 1 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 8 2 0 

### 2

3

# Tabl e 8 . PS D Incremen t Analysi s Numbe r of Permit s Problem s I n Determinin g Incremen t Consumptio n State/Loca l Wher e a n Incremen t TS P Emission s SO , Emission s Agenc y Analysi s wa s Performed Majo r Source s Mino r Source s Majo r Source s Mino r Source s

r o 0* > 

### 2 2

2 4 2 5 3 0 3 3 3 4 3 5 4 5 4 6 4 7 5 1 5 3 5 5 

### 1

3 1 3 2 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 3

# Tabl e 8 . PS D Incremen t Analysi s Numbe ro f Permit s Problem s i n Determinin g Incremen t Consumptio n State/Loca l Where a n Incremen t TS P Emission s SO , Emission s Agenc yAnalysi s wa s Performe d Majo rSource s Mino rSource s Majo rSource s Mino rSource s 5 6 5 7 6 4 1

1 2 Tota l 46 r o -j***-'<

. .* ' , 

# Tabl e 9 . NAAQ S Protectio n

State/Loca l Agency 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 NAAQ S Analyse s

fo r NSR/PS D Permit s Don e Correctl y

_ 

# o
•

— 

# o o

— 

# o o

— •

. — 

# o o

— 

# o

„ ^ Require d NAAQ S

Analysi s Don e fo r Non-NSR/PS D Permits 3 

# O O
•

— 

# O 9 O

—
— 

# 9
• 

# 9 O O

— 

# o

_ NAAQ S Analysi s ' ' fo r Al l Permit s Protecte d Agains t ! th e Developmen t o f"Ho t Spots" 6 i

: I ?

* I 

# o : o :

i 

# O ; 9 ! 

# o :

I I 

# 9 ! ? ' ' 

# o 0 i 

# o o i

i I i I ? i
I j 2 5P.3 0

, •* •. V 

# Tabl e 9 . NAAQ S Protectio n

State/Loca l Agenc y 1 8 1 9 20 2 1 22 23 2 4 25 26 27 28 3 0 3 1 32 33 3 4 35 NAAQ S Analyse s

fo r NSR/PS D Permit s Don e Correctl y 

# O

— 

# 9 0 O

— 

# O 

# o o o

— 

# 0

—

— 

# o o o Require d NAAQ S

Analysi s Don e fo r Non-NSR/PS D Permits 3 

# O O 9 9 9 0

— 

# 9 0

— 

# 0

— 

# o

— 

# o

—' • NAAQ S Analysi s

fo r Al l Permit s Protecte d Agains t th e Developmen t o f "Ho t Spots" b
• ? 

# O ? 

# o ? 

# o o ? 

# o ? 

# 9 9

— 

# 9 O O 2 6P.3 1

* t •• 

# Tabl e 9 . NAAQ S Protectio n

State/Loca l Agenc y 3 6 3 7 38 3 9 4 0 4 1 42 4 3 4 4 4 5 46 47 4 8 49 5 0 5 1 5 2 NAAQ S Analyse s

fo r NSR/PS D Permit s Don e Correctl y ^ 

# 0

—
—

—'.- .
—
—
— 

# o o o

—
—
— 

# 9

__ » Require d NAAQ S

Analysi s Don e fo r Non-NSR/PS D Permits 3

^ _ • 

# 9 9 

# o 9

— 

# O

— 

# o o o o

— 

# 9 

# o 9 NAAQ S Analysi s

fo r Al l Permit s Protecte d Agains t th e Developmen t o f "Ho t Spots" b

— _ NA • • • •

—' 

# O

— 

# o 9 ? 

# O

- r - 

### ? j 

# o ; ? i

I i i ! ' ' ' i i i

i i i i i 

### i

i i i


# 1
2 7P.3 2

53 

# Tabl e 9 . NAAQ S Protectio n

State/Loca l Agenc y NAAQ S Analyse s

fo rNSR/PS D Permit s Don e Correctl y Require d NAAQ S Analysi s Don e fo r Non-NSR/PS D Permits 3 NAAQ S Analysi s fo rAl l Permit s Protecte d Agains t th e Developmen t o f "Ho t Spots" b 

# o o 5 4 5 5 5 6 5 7 5 8 5 9 6 0 6 1 6 2 6 3 6 4 — 

# o 0 

# o 0

—

—

. —

—

— 

# o 9

O O 

# o o

9 O

N A 

# n Th e shade d area s includ e permit s where th e NAAQ S analysi s wa s incomplet e (i.e. , pollutant s no t considered) . Th e shade d area s indicat e tha t significan t emission s fro m othe rsource s i n th e vicinit ywer e ignored .

2 8

# Tabl e 10 . Emissio n Offset Requirement s

r o t o State/Loca l

Agency 06 1 4 1 5 1 6 21 3 2 8 3 1 3 5 38 Numbe ro f

Permit s 1 1 2 5 1 I 1 I 1 Pollutant s

H C TSP , H C HC , TS P H C NOx , CO , H C H C H C SO , TSP , S0 2 , NOx , CO.H C Offset s are

Federall y Enforceabl e ? 

# O O O

— 

# O 

# o o o Offsets ar

e Expresse d Minor/Are a I n Sam e Term s Sourc e Growt h a s RFP Demonstratio n Take n Int o Accoun t ? 

# O O O

— ? 

# O
9 

# o ? 

# o ? 

# 9

— ? 

# o ? ? 

# LO J

o State/Loca l

Agenc y 45 ' 5 1 55 ° 6 1 a 

# Iabl e 10 . Emissio n Offse t Requirements Nunbero f Pemlts Pollutants Offset s are Cutset s ar e Expresse

d M i nor/Area Federall y ; | i n Sam e Term s Sourc e Growt h Enforceabl e m

RF P Demonstratio

n Take n Int o Accoun t * TSP , H C CO.H C C O H C i ! * 

# o o o Permit denied . Stat e regulation s allowpostponemen t o f offset s fo r resource recover y facilities , i foffset s are no t readil y available . 'Emissio n offsets no

t applied , bu

t shoul d hav

e been . Fil e was no

t availabl e fo r review .

# - Tabl e 1 1

State/Loca l • Agenc y 

# 1 0

1

—03

06 

## I 0

8 I 0

9 

# • 1 0 1 2 

## I 1

3

• 1 5 1 7 1 9 | 2 3

• 24 25 B 2 6 

### 1 2 8

• 2 9 

## i



# . Permi t Specifity an d Clarity 3 i Source' s Allowabl e Emission s 

# 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 State d o rReference d i n Permi t

Eac h Emissio n Uni t an d Allowabl e Emissio n Limi t 

# 9 9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9 9 3 1 : i i

i Complianc e ' Test Method s : ' 1

• ;

i i i i 1 

# 9 '

i i i • ;

1 

# 9 ! 9 : 9 9

i

i 1 i 

# •j

' i 

# 9 j i i 1 1

•:

i i . P.3 5

c '

- 1P.3 6

' v » 

# 'T * +. 

# Tabl e 11 . Permi t Specifit yan d Clarity '

State/Loca l Agenc y 3 0 33 38 4 0 4 3 4 5 46 5 1 52 5 8 6 0 TOTA L AGENCIE S Source' s Allowabl e Emission s 

# 9 9 9 9 9
1 5 State d o rReference d i n Permi t

Eac h Emissio n Uni t an d Allowabl e Emissio n Limi t 

# 9 9 9 9

• •

1 5 Complianc e

Tes t Method s 

# 9
• 

# 9 Q

2 0 a Th e stat e an d loca l agencie s include d i n thi s tabl e wer e thos e fo rwho m th e Region' s indicate d i n th e executiv e summarynarrative s tha t wer e problem s wit h permi t specifit yan d clarity .

32