alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








The
      undersigned, Mason N. Carter, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer of Merrimac Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:





|1. | The
              Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
              27,
              2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
              hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements
              of
              Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
              and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | The
              information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
              of
              the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









/s/
      Mason N. Carter


Mason
      N.
      Carter


Chief
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


November
      17, 2008
CAUSE NO. 04-13-00757-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR 

THE FOURTH DISTRICT AT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 

Michael Tatsch, 

Appellant, 

v.

Chrysler Group LLC and 

Infinity County Mutual Insurance Company, 

Appellees. 

On Appeal from the 

216th Judicial District Court of Gillespie County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 12977 

NOTICE OF NAME CHANGE OF APPELLEE CHRYSLER GROUP LLC 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that effective December 15, 2014, Appellee previously known as 

Chrysler Group LLC is now known as FCA US LLC, pursuant the Certificate of Amendment attached 

hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein for all purposes. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 BEATTY BANGLE STRAMA PC

 400 West 15th Street, Suite #1450 

 Austin, TX 78701 

 (512) 879-5050; (512) 879-5040 (FAX) 

 By: /s/ Matthew R. Beatty 

Matthew R. Beatty 

State Bar No. 24001169 

mbeatty@bbsfirm.com 

David A. Polsinelli 

State Bar No. 24088238 

dpolsinelli@bbsfirm.co 

ACCEPTED

04-13-00757-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

2/9/2015 4:45:43 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 02/9/2015 4:45:43 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
- 2 -

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE CHRYSLER GROUP LLC, 

NOW KNOWN AS FCA US LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has been served 

on the following counsel by fax in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and 

this Court’s Local Rules on February 9, 2015:

Craig M. Patrick

Patrick Law Firm, PC

3333 Lee Parkway, Suite #600

Dallas, TX 75219

(214) 665-9510

(214) 665-9511 (FAX)

Sharla J. Frost

Gwendolyn S. Frost

Shawn D. Golden

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

Two Houston Center

909 Fannin, Suite 3300

Houston, Texas 77010

(713) 353-2000

(713) 785-7780 (FAX)

 /s/ Matthew R. Beatty

Matthew R. Beatty

David A. Posinelli
Representative Alan Austerman 

Alaska State Legislature 

Session: 

State Capitol 

Juneau, Alaska 99801 

(907) 465-2487 I (800) 865-2487 

(907) 465-4956 (fax) 

July 5,2011 

US Department of Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

EAS@dot.gov 

Attn: Kevin Adams 

202-366-1047 

Kevin.Adams@dot.gov 

. RE: DOT -OST -2000-6945 

Dear Mr. Adams, 

Rep_Alan_Austerman@legis.state.ak.us 

Interim: 

305 Center Ave, Suite 1 

Kodiak, Alaska 99615 

(907) 486-8872 

(907) 486-5264 (fax) 

llJ 

I am writing to encourage you to consider re-selecting Redemption, Inc., d/b/a Island Air Service for the Kodiak 

Essential Air Service Bid. Island Air Service has been serving our Kodiak's outlying communities for over 30 

years and I trust that they have the necessary experience, payload capacity and dedication to carry out the contract. 

Sincerely, 

Alan Austerman 

House District 36 

Cc: Senator Gary Stevens, District R 

- Representing Alaska State House District 36 -

Akhiok I Igiugig I Iliamna t Karluk I Kodiak I Kokhanok I Larsen Bay I Levelock 

Newhalen I Nondalton I Old Harbor I Ouzinkie I Pedro Bay I Port Alsworth I Port Lions
§ 220.13 Reporting emergencies. ( a ) Employees shall immediately report by the quickest means available derailments, collisions, storms, wash-outs, fires, obstructions to tracks, and other hazardous conditions which could result in death or injury, damage to property or serious disruption of railroad operations.
( b ) In reporting emergencies, employees shall follow: ( 1 ) The procedures of § 220.47 when using a radio; or
( 2 ) The procedures specified for reporting emergencies in the railroad's timetables or timetable special instructions, when using another means of wireless communications.
( c ) Employees shall describe as completely as possible the nature, degree and location of the hazard.
( d ) An alternative means of communications capability shall be provided whenever the control center is unattended or unable to receive radio transmissions during a period in which railroad operations are conducted.
#### § 216.23 Consideration of recommendation.

Upon receipt of a Notice of Track Conditions issued under § 216.21, the FRA Regional Administrator prepares a recommendation to the Administrator concerning the issuance of an Emergency order removing the affected track from service. In preparing this recommendation, the FRA Regional Administrator considers all written or other material bearing on the condition of the track received from the railroad within three (3) calendar days of the issuance of the Notice of Track Conditions and also considers the report of the FRA Regional Track Engineer.

[67 FR 19989, Apr. 23, 2002]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0615.html[7/21/2015 7:17:48 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-hkz1

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0615

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan my own retirement and do not need government regulations to tell me what I have to

 do with my money.
Exhibit 10.49


 


ACTION BY UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT


OF THE


BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

VERTIS HOLDINGS, INC.


 


WHEREAS, the undersigned, being all of the members of the Board of
Directors (the “Board”) of Vertis Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”),
hereby consent to the adoption of the following resolutions in lieu of a
meeting of the Board, and approve and adopt such resolutions with the same
force and effect as if they had been approved and adopted at a duly convened
meeting of the Board of the Corporation and direct that this written consent of
the Board (the “Consent”) be filed with the minutes of the proceedings of the
Board:


 


RESOLVED, that effective as of June 30, 2000, the
Big Flower Holdings, Inc. 1999 Equity Award Plan will be changed to be the “Vertis
Holdings, Inc. 1999 Equity Award Plan” (the “Award Plan”); and further


 


RESOLVED, that all definitions, terms and conditions of the Award Plan
shall continue in full force and effect, without change or revision; and
further


 


RESOLVED,
that this consent may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed to be an original and all of which together shall be deemed to
constitute one and the same consent.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all of the members of the Board of
Directors, have hereunto executed this consent this 25th day of November, 2002.


 


 


	
   

  	
  /s/ Donald E. Roland

  
	
   

  	
  Donald E. Roland

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Anthony J. DiNovi

  
	
   

  	
  Anthony J. DiNovi

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Thomas H. Lee

  
	
   

  	
  Thomas H. Lee

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Soren L. Oberg

  
	
   

  	
  Soren L. Oberg

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Scott M. Sperling

  
	
   

  	
  Scott M. Sperling

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Roger C. Altman

  
	
   

  	
  Roger C. Altman

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Austin M. Beutner

  
	
   

  	
  Austin M. Beutner
§ 372.235 New York, NY. The zone adjacent to, and commercially a part of, New York, NY, within which transportation by motor vehicle, in interstate or foreign commerce, not under common control, management, or arrangement for shipment to or from points beyond such zone is partially exempt from regulation under 49 U.S.C. 13506(b)(1), includes and is comprised of all points as follows: ( a ) The municipality of New York, NY, itself;
( b ) All points within a line drawn 20 miles beyond the municipal limits of New York, NY;
( c ) All points in Morris County, NJ;
( d ) All of any municipality any part of which is within the limits of the combined areas defined in paragraphs (b) and (c); and
( e ) All of any municipality wholly surrounded, or so surrounded except by a water boundary, by the municipality of New York or by any other municipality included under the terms of paragraph (d) of this section.
[50 FR 34478, Aug. 26, 1985. Redesignated at 55 FR 42198, Oct. 18, 1990, as amended at 62 FR 15422, Apr. 1, 1997]
§ 29.921 Where may the Tribe appeal the Self-Governance Official's decision on a Contract Disputes Act claim? The Tribe may appeal the Self-Governance Official's decision on a Contract Disputes Act claim in one of the following forums: ( a ) The Civilian Board of Contract Appeals. The appeal must be in accordance with the Board's implementing regulations in 48 CFR part 6101;
( b ) The U.S. Court of Federal Claims; or
( c ) The U.S. District Courts.
§ 240.9 Waivers. ( a ) A person subject to a requirement of this part may petition the Administrator for a waiver of compliance with such requirement. The filing of such a petition does not affect that person's responsibility for compliance with that requirement while the petition is being considered.
( b ) Each petition for a waiver under this section must be filed in the manner and contain the information required by part 211 of this chapter.
( c ) If the Administrator finds that a waiver of compliance is in the public interest and is consistent with railroad safety, the Administrator may grant the waiver subject to any conditions the Administrator deems necessary.
[56 FR 28254, June 19, 1991, as amended at 64 FR 60989, Nov. 8, 1999]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6044

RONALD JERRY SAWYER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, VDOC; W. E.

MARTIN; COLIN ANGLICKER; K. L. OSBORNE,

Warden; NURSE HALL,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

OFFICER THOMAS; LIEUTENANT JOHNSON; G. D.

JOHNSON,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District

Judge. (CA-95-657-R)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 28, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Jerry Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Richard

Edward Ladd, Jr., PENN, STUART, ESKRIDGE & JONES, Abingdon,

Virginia, for Appellees.
2
3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant noted an appeal prior to the district court's action

on his motions for default judgment and sanctions. We dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction because there is no appealable

order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). Appellant does

not appeal a final order or an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We further deny Appellant's motion to remand the case and for sanctions against Appellees. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 27, 1995 (121), Para 121.6 Enrolled Bills Signed]
[Page 1452]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.121.6  enrolled bills signed

  The SPEAKER announced that pursuant to clause 4, rule I, he signed the 
following enrolled bills on Tuesday, September 26, 1995:

       H.R. 1817. An Act making appropriations for military 
     construction, family housing, and base realignment and 
     closure for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year 
     ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes; and

       H.R. 1854. An Act making appropriations for the legislative 
     branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for 
     other purposes.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                                FIRSTENERGY CORP.

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-48587, 333-102074 and 333-103865) and Form S-8
(Nos. 333-48651, 333-56094, 333-58279, 333-67798, 333-72764, 333-72766,
333-72768, 333-75985, 333-81183, 333-89356 and 333-101472) of FirstEnergy Corp.
of our report dated February 28, 2003, except as to Note 2(L), which is as of
May 9, 2003, and Notes 2(M) and 8, which are as of August 18, 2003, relating to
the consolidated financial statements, which appears in the restated Annual
Report to Stockholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form
10-K/A.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
August 18, 2003


                                       57
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-146483-01 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 19, 2008, relating to thefinancial statements and financial statement schedule of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’sapplication of “push-down accounting” effective April 3, 2006), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Charlotte, North Carolina 

March 19, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                                          56,589
<SECURITIES>                                    13,250
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,149
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,030
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               149,999
<PP&E>                                         131,265
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (93,813)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,282
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       129,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,954
<SALES>                                        142,432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               225,133
<CGS>                                           22,442
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,467
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               151,838
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,940
<INCOME-TAX>                                       560
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,380
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,380
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        


</TABLE>
§ 299.427 Emergency egress windows. ( a ) *Number and location.* Each unit in a trainset shall have a minimum of four emergency egress windows. At least one emergency egress window shall be located in each side of each end (half) of the car, in a staggered configuration where practicable. (See Figure 1 to this paragraph.)
( b ) *Ease of operability.* Each emergency egress window shall be designed to permit rapid and easy removal from the inside of the car during an emergency situation using a hammer designed to break the glazing that shall be located adjacent to each emergency egress window. The railroad shall inspect for the presence of the emergency hammers each day prior to the trainset being placed into service in accordance with § 299.711(b).
( c ) *Dimensions.* Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this section, each emergency egress window in a passenger car shall have an unobstructed opening with minimum dimensions of 660 mm (26 inches) horizontally by 610 mm (24 inches) vertically. A seatback is not an obstruction if it can be moved away from the window opening without using a tool or other implement.
( d ) *Marking and instructions.* ( 1 ) Each emergency egress window shall be conspicuously and legibly marked with luminescent material on the inside of each car to facilitate passenger egress as specified in § 299.423.
( 2 ) Legible and understandable operating instructions, including instructions for removing the emergency egress window shall be made of luminescent material, shall be posted at or near each such emergency egress window as specified in § 299.423.
( e ) *Obstructions.* If emergency egress window removal may be hindered by the presence of a seatback, headrest, luggage rack, or other fixture, the instructions shall state the method for allowing rapid and easy removal of the emergency egress window, taking into account the fixture(s), and this portion of the instructions may be in written or pictorial format.
( f ) *Additional emergency egress windows.* Any emergency egress window in addition to the minimum number required by paragraph (a) of this section that has been designated for use by the railroad need not comply with the minimum dimension requirements in paragraph (c) of this section, but must otherwise comply with all requirements in this subpart applicable to emergency egress windows.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, September 19, 1995 (117), Para 117.23 Re-Referral--H.R. 2202]
[Page 1403]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.117.23  re-referral--h.r. 2202

  On motion of Mr. McKEON, by unanimous consent, the bill (H.R. 2202) to 
amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to improve deterrence of 
illegal immigration to the United States by increasing border patrol and 
investigative personnel, by increasing penalties for alien smuggling and 
for document fraud, by reforming exclusion and deportation law and 
procedures, by improving the verification system for eligibility for 
employment, and through other measures, to reform the legal immigration 
system and facilitate legal entries into the United States, and for 
other purposes; which had been referred to the Committee on the 
Judiciary, the Committee on Banking and Financial Services, the 
Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, the Committee on National 
Security, and the Committee on Ways and Means; be re-referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Banking and Financial 
Services, the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, the 
Committee on National Security, and the Committee on Ways and Means, the 
Committee on Agriculture and the Committee on Economic and Educational 
Opportunities for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
jurisdiction of the committte concerned.
```
March 20, 2006

To: Aurora Gold Corporation
30 Ledger Road,
Balcatta, Western Australia, 6021 Australia

Tel. 604-687-4432
Fax  604-687-4709

Attention: Cameron Richardson
Email: c.richardson@telus.net
       ----------------------


From: Tomas Almeida, Certified Translator

Re: Translation of Option Agreement regarding Santa Isabel Project



                            Translator's Declaration

I,  Tomas  Almeida,  Certified  Portuguese to English Translator, Member in good
standing  of  the  Society  of  Translators and Interpreters of British Columbia
(STIBC),  which  is  a  member  association  of  the  Canadian  Translators  and
Interpreters Council (CTIC), hereby attest that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, the above-mentioned document is a true, correct and complete translation
of  the  Portuguese  document  presented  to  me.


Tomas Almeida



Tomas Almeida
19780 Honeydew Drive
Pitt Meadows, BC V3Y 2S6

Tel. 604-465-6128
Fax 604-465-6129
Cell.604-202-0031
Email: talmeida@telus.net
       ------------------
#### Cyrus H. McCormick, *Respondent, v.*The Pennsylvania Central Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed.
-----Original Message----- 

From: sbulmash@bellsouth.net [mailto:sbulmash@bellsouth.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:36 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Susan Bulmash 

1515 Wedgefield Ct. 

Alpharetta, GA 30004