alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCellular track model of biological damage to mammalian cell cultures from galactic cosmic raysThe assessment of biological damage from the galactic cosmic rays (GCR) is a current interest for exploratory class space missions where the highly ionizing, high-energy, high-charge ions (HZE) particles are the major concern. The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values determined by ground-based experiments with HZE particles are well described by a parametric track theory of cell inactivation. Using the track model and a deterministic GCR transport code, the biological damage to mammalian cell cultures is considered for 1 year in free space at solar minimum for typical spacecraft shielding. Included are the effects of projectile and target fragmentation. The RBE values for the GCR spectrum which are fluence-dependent in the track model are found to be more severe than the quality factors identified by the International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 26 and seem to obey a simple scaling law with the duration period in free space.Document ID19910007668Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsCucinotta, Francis A.*(Rockwell International Corp. Houston, TX., United States)*Katz, Robert*(Nebraska Univ. Lincoln., United States)*Wilson, John W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Townsend, Lawrence W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Nealy, John E.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Shinn, Judy L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1991Subject CategorySpace RadiationReport/Patent NumberL-16831NAS 1.60:3055NASA-TP-3055Accession Number91N16981Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 199-04-16-11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910007668.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 17, 1995 (129), Para 129.10 Harry Kirizian Post Office Building]
[Page 1530]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.129.10  harry kirizian post office building

  Mr. McHUGH moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 1606) to 
designate the United States Post Office building located at 24 Corliss 
Street, Providence, Rhode Island, as the ``Harry Kizirian Post Office 
Building''.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. RIGGS, recognized Mr.McHUGH and Miss 
COLLINS of Michigan, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. RIGGS, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and 
said bill was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, October 25, 1995 (134), Para 134.16 After Recess--1:00 A.M.]
[Page 1595]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.134.16  after recess--1:00 a.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. DREIER, called the House to order.
```
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Mason N. Carter, Chief Executive Officer of Merrimac
Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
          September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
          Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies
          with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

/s/ Mason N. Carter
-------------------------------------
Mason N. Carter
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2006

                                       39
```
SUPREME COURT.

#### John C. Shults agt. Samuel N. Andrews.

*Supplementary*proceedings— *Oontmnpt.*

Even where an order granted in supplementary proceedings is irregular, the judgment debtor must appear. If he fails to appear, trusting entirely to the success of his attorney’s efforts to have the order set aside, although such effort prove successful, he is guilty of contempt *(See S. O., ante,*376).

*Herkimer Special*Term, December, *1877.*

An order was granted on the twenty-seventh December, requiring the defendant to appear before a referee to be examined concerning his property on the twenty-eighth December, at ten a. m.

Defendant did not appear; he left town early in the morning upon business, and left the papers with an attorney, with a request to have the order set a side for irregularity, and that he claimed privilege of process.

P. *H. McEvoy,*for motion.

*E. E. Sheldon*d? *Samuel H.*Andrews, in person, opposed.

Hardin, *J.*

The order to be examined was served on defendant less than twenty-four hours before the return hour, and the defendant swears to having put his papers into the hands of an attorney for the purpose of a motion to set aside the order for irregularity.

*379The attorney for defendant obtained an order to show cause why the first order to be examined should not be set aside, the order was not served until an hour after the defendant was required to appear and be re-examined. That motion has been heard and the order set aside for irregularity.

The defendant was an attorney of this court, and he had some reason to suppose that the objection was a good one, and would set aside the order as it has done. But he should not have left it all to his attorney and trust to luck. It was indiscreet so to do.

The defendant by so doing was guilty of contempt, and he must pay therefor. But from the affidavits and papers, it does not appear to have been based upon a flagrant and willful intent to disregard the order. A fine of ten dollars is therefore imposed for a disregard of the order, to be examined before the referee.
§ 29.508 What procurement standards apply to contracts carried out using funds included in a funding agreement? ( a ) Each contract carried out using funds included in a funding agreement must, at a minimum: ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) Identify the interested parties, their respective roles and responsibilities, and the purposes of the contract;
( 3 ) State the work to be performed under the contract;
( 4 ) State the process for making any claim, the payments to be made, and the terms of the contract; and
( 5 ) State that it is subject to 25 U.S.C. 5307(b) consistent with § 29.524.
( b ) A Tribe that chooses to use a procurement method that is not provided for in its established procurement management standards in the delivery of a Tribal transportation project must submit the request to deviate from these standards to the Department for review and approval in accordance with § 29.515. The deviation request must specify the procurement method that the Tribe proposes to use and the project to which such method will be applied.
§ 240.221 Identification of qualified persons. ( a ) A railroad shall maintain a written record identifying each person designated by it as a supervisor of locomotive engineers.
( b ) A railroad shall maintain a written record identifying each person designated as a certified locomotive engineer. That listing of certified engineers shall indicate the class of service the railroad determines each person is qualified to perform and date of the railroad's certification decision.
( c ) If a railroad is responsible for controlling joint operations territory, the listing shall include person(s) certified in accordance with § 240.229.
( d ) The listing required by paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section shall: ( 1 ) Be updated at least annually;
( 2 ) Be available at the divisional or regional headquarters of the railroad; and
( 3 ) Be available for inspection or copying by FRA during regular business hours.
( e ) It shall be unlawful for any railroad to knowingly or any individual to willfully: ( 1 ) Make, cause to be made, or participate in the making of a false entry on the list required by this section; or
( 2 ) Otherwise falsify such list through material misstatement, omission, or mutilation.
( f ) Nothing in this section precludes a railroad from maintaining the list required under this section in an electronic format provided that: ( 1 ) The railroad maintains an information technology security program adequate to ensure the integrity of the electronic data storage system, including the prevention of unauthorized access to the program logic or the list;
( 2 ) The program and data storage system must be protected by a security system that utilizes an employee identification number and password, or a comparable method, to establish appropriate levels of program access meeting all of the following standards: ( i ) No two individuals have the same electronic identity; and
( ii ) An entry on the list cannot be deleted or altered by any individual after the entry is certified by the employee who created the entry;
( 3 ) Any amendment to the list is either: ( i ) Electronically stored apart from the entry on the list that it amends; or
( ii ) Electronically attached to the entry on the list as information without changing the original entry;
( 4 ) Each amendment to the list uniquely identifies the person making the amendment;
( 5 ) The system employed by the railroad for data storage permits reasonable access and retrieval of the information in usable format when requested to furnish data by FRA representatives; and
( 6 ) Information retrieved from the system can be easily produced in a printed format which can be readily provided to FRA representatives in a timely manner and authenticated by a designated representative of the railroad as a true and accurate copy of the railroad's records if requested to do so by FRA representatives.
[56 FR 28254, June 19, 1991, as amended at 74 FR 68184, Dec. 23, 2009; 85 FR 81315, Dec. 15, 2020]
~-

' t 

' : 

1 I 

f 

' I '

r 

' ! 

f 

Bates, R. G., 2nd Edition. 

f pH Theory a nd Practice, Dc.tc.rminatton ° tlew York, 1973. John Wiley & Sons, 

c 

..... 

I 

0 

C1l 

C1l
§ 232.219 Double-heading and helper service. ( a ) When more than one locomotive is attached to a train, the engineer of the controlling locomotive shall operate the brakes. In case it becomes necessary for the controlling locomotive to give up control of the train short of the destination of the train, a Class III brake test pursuant to § 232.211 shall be made to ensure that the brakes are operative from the automatic brake valve of the locomotive taking control of the train.
( b ) When one or more helper locomotives are placed in a train, a visual inspection shall be made of each helper locomotive brake system to determine that the brake system operates as intended in response to a 20-psi reduction initiated from the controlling locomotive of the train. A helper locomotive with inoperative or ineffective brakes shall be repaired prior to use or removed from the train.
( c ) If a helper locomotive utilizes a Helper Link device or a similar technology, the locomotive and device shall be equipped, designed, and maintained as follows: ( 1 ) The locomotive engineer shall be notified by a distinctive alarm of any loss of communication between the device and the two-way end-of-train device of more than 25 seconds;
( 2 ) A method to reset the device shall be provided in the cab of the helper locomotive that can be operated from the engineer's usual position during operation of the locomotive. Alternatively, the helper locomotive or the device shall be equipped with a means to automatically reset the device, provided that the automatic reset occurs within the period time permitted for manual reset of the device; and
( 3 ) When helping trains equipped with distributed power or ECP brakes on the rear of the train, and utilizing a *Helper Link* device or a similar technology, a properly installed and tested end-of-train device may be utilized on the helper locomotive. Railroads must adopt and comply with an operating rule consistent with this chapter to ensure the safe use of this alternative procedure.
( 4 ) The device shall be tested for accuracy and calibrated if necessary according to the manufacturer's specifications and procedures every 365 days. This shall include testing radio frequencies and modulation of the device. A legible record of the date and location of the last test or calibration shall be maintained with the device.
[66 FR 4193, Jan. 17, 2001, as amended at 67 FR 17584, Apr. 10, 2002; 85 FR 80573, Dec. 11, 2020]
§ 31.30 The hearing and burden of proof. ( a ) The ALJ shall conduct a hearing on the record in order to determine whether the defendant is liable for a civil penalty or assessment under § 31.3 and, if so, the appropriate amount of any such civil penalty or assessment considering any aggravating or mitigating factors.
( b ) The authority shall prove defendent's liability and any aggravating factors by a preponderance of the evidence.
( c ) The defendant shall prove any affirmative defenses and any mitigating factors by a preponderance of the evidence.
( d ) The hearing shall be open to the public unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ for good cause shown.
-----Original Message----- 

From: romanak@sbcglobal.net [mailto:romanak@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 1:06 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, Mara Romanak 

 3569 Lincoln Avenue 

 Oakland, CA 94602 

Sincerely, 

Mara Romanak 

3569 Lincoln Ave 

Oakland, CA 94602
https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=090000648 1b4e716&format=xml&show...

Page 1 of 1

As of: 6/24/15 9:42 PM
Received: June 23, 2015

Status: Pending Post
PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. 1jz-8jkz-g4un
Comments Due: July 06, 2015
Submission Type: API

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050
Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice;
Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204
Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0326
Comment on FR Doe # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Amber Hackett
Address:

3319 Windsor Avenue

Kansas City, MO, 64123
Email: Amber-h.jeffers@gmail.com
Phone: 214-566-0555

General Comment

I fully support the proposal to impose a fiduciary duty on investment advisers. I am a 35 year
old married attorney who is licensed to practice law in two states. I have just under $80,000
saved for retirement. My 33 year old brother has saved. As an attorney,
Ihave a duty of fiduciary care toward my clients. My realtor has a fiduciary duty to her clients.
Even professional fundraisers have a duty to their donors. Financial advisers should honor the
same professional standard.

The status quo proves that, when left to their own devices, financial advisers are likely to act in
their own best interest, and not that of their clients. This costs normal Americans tens of
millions of dollars. With the vast reduction of defined benefit plans and the projected shortfall
of Social Security, the responsibility for financial security in retirement falls squarely on the
shoulders of ordinary citizens. Please give us a fighting chance. Require financial advisers to act
in their clients' best interest. They may well discover that acting in this manner will benefit their
interests as well.

6/24/2015
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Queens County Water Company, Appellant, *v.*Egbert E. Woodbury et al., as State Board of Tax Commissioners, Respondents. The City of New York, Appellant.

*People ex rel. Queens County Water Co.*v. *Woodbury,*143 App. Div. 618, affirmed.

(Argued June 2, 1911;

decided June 16, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 17, 1911, which affirmed an order of Special Term reducing an assessment for purposes of taxation against the special franchise of relator.

*Henry de Forest Baldwin*for relator, appellant.

*Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Curtis A. Peters*and *Addison B. Scoville*of counsel), for City of New York, appellant.

*Thomas Carmody, Attorney-General (C. R. McSparren*of counsel), for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Culler, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ.
#### § 37.15 Interpretations and guidance.

The Secretary of Transportation, Office of the Secretary of Transportation, and Operating Administrations may issue written interpretations of or written guidance concerning this part. Written interpretations and guidance shall be developed through the Department's coordinating mechanism for disability matters, the Disability Law Coordinating Council. Written interpretations and guidance constitute the official position of the Department of Transportation, or any of its operating administrations, only if they are issued over the signature of the Secretary of Transportation or if they contain the following statement: “The General Counsel of the Department of Transportation has reviewed this document and approved it as consistent with the language and intent of 49 CFR parts 27, 37, 38, and/or 39, as applicable.”

[76 FR 57935, Sept. 19, 2011]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0520.html[7/20/2015 7:58:52 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-20mv

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0520

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Donna Watton

General Comment

Leave my 401K and IRA alone. I've saved for my retirement and smart enough to manage my retirement

 savings. The government needs to STAY OUT of my retirement savings. Government manages to screw up and

 cost the taxpayers more money with everything they touch. STAY OUT of my retirement!
#### § 234.241 Protection of insulated wire; splice in underground wire.

Insulated wire shall be protected from mechanical injury. The insulation shall not be punctured for test purposes. A splice in underground wire shall have insulation resistance at least equal to that of the wire spliced.
§ 244.1 Scope, application, and purpose. ( a ) This part prescribes requirements for filing and implementing a Safety Integration Plan with FRA whenever a Class I railroad proposes to consolidate with, merge with, or acquire control of another Class I railroad, or with a Class II railroad where there is a proposed amalgamation of operations.
( b ) The purpose of this part is to achieve a reasonable level of railroad safety during the implementation of transactions described in paragraph (a) of this section. This part does not preclude a railroad from taking additional measures not inconsistent with this part to provide for safety in connection with a transaction.
( c ) The requirements prescribed under this part apply only to FRA's disposition of a regulated transaction filed by an applicant. The transactions covered by this part also require separate filing with and approval by the Surface Transportation Board. *See* 49 CFR part 1106.
```

[112th Congress Public Law 261]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 2428]]

Public Law 112-261
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
      To amend the Animal Welfare Act to modify the definition of 
          ``exhibitor''. <<NOTE: Jan. 10, 2013 -  [S. 3666]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ANIMAL WELFARE.

    Section 2(h) of the Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 2132(h)) is amended 
by adding ``an owner of a common, domesticated household pet who derives 
less than a substantial portion of income from a nonprimary source (as 
determined by the Secretary) for exhibiting an animal that exclusively 
resides at the residence of the pet owner,'' after ``stores,''.

    Approved January 10, 2013.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3666:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 31, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 236.103 Switch circuit controller or point detector.

Switch circuit controller, circuit controller, or point detector operated by hand-operated switch or by power-operated or mechanically-operated switch-and-lock movement shall be inspected and tested at least once every three months.

[49 FR 3384, Jan. 26, 1984]
§ 229.22 Passenger locomotive inspection and repair record. ( a ) *Application.* This section applies only to lead locomotives of trains used in commuter or intercity passenger service, *i.e.,* locomotives subject to the requirements of § 229.136.
( b ) *Dates.* ( 1 ) Each locomotive subject to the requirements of § 229.136 shall use and maintain Form FRA F 6180-49AP in accordance with the requirements of § 229.136, except that Form FRA F 6180-49A may fulfill any requirement in § 229.136 with respect to Form FRA F 6180-49AP until October 12, 2027.
( 2 ) For purposes of complying with the inspection, testing, and repair recordkeeping requirements in §§ 229.23, 229.27, 229.29, 229.31, 229.33, 229.55, 229.103, 229.105, 229.114, 229.123, and 229.135 with respect to Form FRA F 6180-49A, each locomotive subject to the requirements of § 229.136 shall instead use and maintain Form FRA F 6180-49AP no later than October 12, 2027.
( c ) *Earlier adoption.* Railroads may adopt use of Form FRA F 6180-49AP earlier than required for locomotives subject to the requirements of § 229.136.
( d ) *Effect.* Nothing in this section affects the requirements in this part for use of Form FRA F 6180-49A for locomotives not subject to the requirements of § 229.136.
[88 FR 70761, Oct. 12, 2023]