alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
       [NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
                 United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit





No. 98-1065

                          ROLANDO BELEN,

                      Petitioner, Appellant,

                                v.

                          UNITED STATES,

                      Respondent, Appellee.



           APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

       [Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr., U.S. District Judge]



                              Before

                     Torruella, Chief Judge,
                Stahl and Lipez, Circuit Judges.
                                
                                
                                
                                
                                
     Rolando Belen on brief pro se.
     Paul M. Gagnon, United States Attorney and Peter E. Papps,
Assistant U.S. Attorney, on Motion for Summary Disposition, for
appellee.




November 17, 1999



  
  
  
            Per Curiam. Before us are Mr. Belen's appeal from the
  dismissal as time-barred of his 28 U.S.C. � 2255 petition and
  the government's motions for summary disposition and to treat
  its motion as its brief on appeal.  We allow the government to
  treat its motion as its brief on appeal.
            The district court held that Mr. Belen's petition was
  untimely because it "was not deposited in the institution's
  internal mail system on or before April 23, 1997, the deadline
  for filing the petition."  In Rogers v. United States, 180 F.3d
  349, 355 (1st Cir. 1999), which was decided after the district
  court issued its opinion, we held that the relevant AEDPA
  deadline is April 24, 1997.  In Morales-Rivera v. United
  States, 184 F.3d 109 (1st Cir. 1999), another decision issued
  after the district court's opinion, we held: "a pro se
  prisoner's motion under 28 U.S.C. � 2255 or � 2254 is filed on
  the date that it is deposited in the prison's internal mail-
  system for forwarding to the district court, provided that the
  prisoner utilizes, if available, the prison's system for
  recording legal mail."  
            We vacate the judgment and remand to the district
  court to determine whether Mr. Belen deposited his petition by
  April 24, 1997 in the prison's internal mail-system, utilizing,
  if available, the prison's system for recording legal mail.
            Vacated and remanded.  Loc.R. 27.1.
```
EXHIBIT 23.2





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board of Directors


Vermont Electric Power Company, Inc.





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Nos. 333-141681, 333-151019 and 333-162979) on Form S-3 and the Registration Statement (No. 333-152872) on Form S-8 of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation of our report dated March 8, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Vermont Electric Power Company, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, which report appears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation. Our report on the consolidated financial statements of Vermont Electric Power Company, Inc. and subsidiary, refers to the adoption of FASB ASC Subtopic 810-10, Consolidation—Overall, as of January 1, 2009.






/s/KPMG LLP




Burlington, Vermont


March 11, 2011




















Vt. Reg. No. 92-0000241
§ 29.909 When and how must the hearing official respond to the Tribe's appeal? ( a ) The hearing official must issue a decision in writing within 60 days of the receipt of the appeal. If the Tribe requests an informal hearing, the hearing official must issue a decision within 60 days of the hearing.
( b ) All decisions issued by the hearing official must include a statement describing the rights of a Tribe to appeal the decision to the U.S. District Courts. The Department must provide the decision to the Tribe by any method that provides a receipt.
Print Date: 8 - 26 - 2011Print Date: 8 - 26 - 2011Print Date: 8 - 26 - 2011Print Date: 8 - 26 - 2011Print Date: 8 - 26 - 2011Print Date: 8 - 26 - 2011Print Date: 8 - 26 - 2011
Consent of Independent Public Accountants


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the 
incorporation by reference of our report, dated January 25, 1996, 
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 
31, 1995, into (i) Cinergy Corp.'s previously filed Registration 
Statement Nos. 33-55267, 33-55291, 33-55293, 33-55713, 33-56067, 33-
56089, 33-56091, 33-56093 and 33-56095; (ii) PSI Energy, Inc.'s 
previously filed Registration Statement Nos. 33-48612 and 33-57064; 
(iii) The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company's previously filed 
Registration Statement Nos. 33-45116, 33-52335 and 33-58967; and (iv) 
The Union Light, Heat and Power Company's previously filed Registration 
Statement Nos. 33-40245 and 33-58965.



Arthur Andersen LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio,
March 22, 1996
Exhibit
4





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul O.
Richins, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/
Paul O. Richins


Paul O.
Richins


May 9,
2008








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 

# TIME AND DATE:

10:00 a.m., Monday, February 5, 2007.

# PLACE:

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

1.  Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees.

2.  Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-2955.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                        You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at                         *http://www.federalreserve.gov*                         for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting.                    

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 26, 2007.

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 07-428 Filed 1-26-07; 3:54 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
From: Nathan M [mailto:nathan@synergywealthalliance.com] 

Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 10:55 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Please extend the comment period. This will give the public as well as people in our industry more time 

to analyze your proposal. 

Nathan Meeks, CRPC

Investment Advisor Representative

Registered Representative

Financial Planner

485 N. Keller Road, Suite 444

Maitland, FL 32751

Phone 321. 203. 4458

Fax 321. 203. 4459

www.synergywealthalliance.com

 

Securities and advisory services offered through Cetera Advisors LLC, member FINRA/SIPC. Cetera is 

under separate ownership from any other named entity.
#### § 236.104 Shunt fouling circuit.

Shunt fouling circuit shall be inspected and tested at least once every three months.
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0120 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Christina M. Delos Reyes 

Address: 

Cleveland, OH, 

Organization: University Hospitals of Cleveland 

General Comment 

The diagnosis and treatment of mental health and substance use disorders must be 

integrated into primary care, pediatrics, and other health services.There needs 

to be a single benefit package which includes treatment of mental health and 

substance use disorders in addition to other medical illnesses. 

I strongly support the principles in the letter written 5.12.09 by the Mental 

Health Liaison Group (attached). 

Attachments 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 27, 2009 

Received: May 27, 2009 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 809b8566 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web

EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0120.1: Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629
Docket: CMS-2009-0040 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: CMS-2009-0040-0048 

Interim Final Rules under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: CMS-2009-0040-DRAFT-0071 

IL 

Submitter Information 

Name: Laura Follenweider 

Address: 

Homewood, IL, 60430 

Organization: BAS 

General Comment 

In the Interim final rules in order to apply the substantive rules the regulations establish standards 

for measuring Plan benefits; is there any type of requirement by the regulatory agencies that the 

review of a Group Health Plan's Plan design be in writing? Is there some sort of official 

"compliance testing" that needs to be performed? Will a Plan have to substantiate an actual testing 

analysis? 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: April 28, 2010 

Received: April 27, 2010 

Status: Draft 

Category: Health Plan or Association

Tracking No. 80ae1e27 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010 

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\gelman.beth\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OL... 4/28/2010
-----Original Message----- 

From: patriciarotunno@comcast.net [mailto:patriciarotunno@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:41 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

This is the wright thing to do. So many people suffer from mental 

illness and can't get the help they need because of no coverage and 

lack of mental professionals who do not take the patients insurance. 

Sincerely, 

Patricia Rotunno 

3512 Fitler Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19114
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D21-2107

_____________________________

HENRY A. WILLIAMS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County.

James M. Colaw, Judge.

September 10, 2021

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, JAY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

 

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Henry A. Williams, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 21 (Thursday, February 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 4765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-436]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory 
Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management 
Advisory Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory 
Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 22, 2007, from 9 a.m. to 12 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at FAA Headquarters, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Bessie Coleman Conference Center (2nd Floor), 
Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., Suite 
805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 833-
9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for the Air Traffic Management Advisory Committee 
meeting. The planned agenda is expected to include:
    <bullet> FAA

--ATO Metrics Dashboard.
--FY08 Budget.
--ADS-B Backup Analysis.
--ADS-B JRC Results (If available).
--OEP.
    <bullet> R&P WG Report.
--OEP.
    <bullet> RTCA OEP Centered Symposium.


    Note: Non-Government attendees to the meeting must go through 
security and be escorted to and from the conference room. Attendees 
with laptops will be required to register them at the security desk 
upon arrival and departure. Agenda items will be posted on http://www.rtca.org Web site.


    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 23, 2007.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 07-436 Filed 1-31-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0982.html[7/21/2015 7:10:55 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-6y6f

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0982

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Cody Frame

General Comment

To whom it may concern....

I work for my life for my family and I am perfectly able to plan my own future. Government gets enough of my

 life money and hard work.

Would love for my government to stop taking more and more of my life. Stop trying to control everything and let

 the people learn what responsibility is.

We the people are responsible for our action. We should reap the benefits of our hard work and planning for our

 future.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, August 3, 1995 (108), Para 108.10 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1249]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.108.10  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. KOLBE:

       On Page 69, strike lines 12-17.

It was decided in the

Yeas

206

negative

Nays

215
```
#### § 29.205 How does the Department acknowledge receipt of a final offer?

Within 10 days of the Self-Governance Official receiving the final offer, the Department will send the Tribe an acknowledgement of the final offer, together with documentation that indicates the date on which the Self-Governance Official received the final offer. The Department's failure to send the acknowledgement does not constitute approval of the final offer.
07/28/201 0 14:0 8 FA X 202493514 2

r-.'" . • • . --- ^ FA A ^ DM S @|001/00 1 '/! J\ l 

# hj^'M ^

Siuar t S . MacPhei-son P.O . Bo x 540

7 Cardiff , Calif . 9200 7 Jun e 18,200 7 ^'^^' %



# '"'•""^•''^Qooare r
Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Dept . o f

Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Ave . S.B . Ras t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE l 2-32 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 , ^ , /) C i 1 ' Dea r Judg e Goodwin , 1 amin receip t

o f aNotic e o f

Assignmen t

o f Proceedin g for

Cas e No . 2009WP910H 6 whic hinform s m c that

yo u wil l b e th e presidin g Judg e in thi s hearing . A s yo u ar e base d i n Washingto n D.C . I mus t assum e tha t

th e hearin g wil l b e takin g plac e i n tha t city . A s trave l t o Washington , D.C . an dtim e awa y firommy hom e i n Sa

n Dieg o wil l presen t

a n undu e hardshi p 1 respectfiill y request , a s di dLaur aPonto , Complainant' s Counsel , tha t th e hearin g fo r

th e above-reference dproceedin g b e hel din San Diego . Thank you for your consideratio n i n thi s matter . : /

luart S . MacPherso n 7 0 C O 1 3
o i 

# i?' '

' : - ' ' •

e n
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0980.html[7/21/2015 7:10:53 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-lxeb

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0980

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Harold Smith

General Comment

Leave my retirement alone I've lost enough with the government bailing out the bankers instead of throwing

 them in jail like they should have been. I can use my income to my own best advantage
exv10w2



 




Exhibit 10.2


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statements filed on Form F-3
(File Nos. 333-84226, 333-128361, 333-129962 and 333-130040) and (ii) the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-11368, 333-11414, 333-13038, 333-13664, 333-13668, 333-14254, 333-14252,
333-81564, 333-92220, 333-108833 and 333-125075) of our report dated March 6, 2006, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of ING Bank N.V., included by reference in this Annual Report
(Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2005.



Amsterdam, The Netherlands




March 28, 2006




KPMG Accountants N.V.
#### The State, *Appellant,*v. Taylor.

Indictment for Selling Liquor Without License: negativing exception to statute. An indictment for selling intoxicating liquors without license need not show that the defendant is not a druggist and authorized as such to sell such liquors.

*Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.*— Hon. S. A. Richardson, Judge.

Reversed.

The indictment charged the defendant with selling intoxicating liquors to certain persons therein named, in less quantities than a gallon, “ without him, the said John T. Taylor, then and there having a dramshop keeper’s license in force authorizing him, the said John T. Taylor, to sell intoxicating liquors in less quantities than one gallon, contrary, etc., against,” etc.

*J. L. Smith,*Attorney General, for the State,

cited *State v. Shiflett,*20 Mo. 415; *State v. Batson,*81 Mo. 343; *State v. Cox,*32 Mo. 566 ; *State v. Meek,*70 Mo. 355.

Sherwood, C. J.

“Where an offense is created by statute, and an exception is made, either by another statute or by another and substantial clause of the same statute, it is not necessary for the prosecutor, either in the indictment or by evidence, to show that the defendant does not come within the exception; but it is for the defendant to prove the affirmative, and which he may do under the plea of not guilty.” 1 Archbold Cr. Pr. & Pl., 118; Ib., 86. The indictment here is framed under section 2, 1 Wagner’s *53Statutes, page 549 : “ No person shall, directly or indirectly, sell intoxicating liquors in any quantity less than one gallon, without taking out a license as a dramshop keeper.” It will be observed here that the indictment charges the ofíense defined in section 2, *supra,*and that such section contains no exceptions. It was unnecessary, therefore, under the rule laid down at the outset of this opinion, to negative any exception not contained in such section. The point urged in the motion in arrest, that the indictment did not “negative either specially or generally the authority of the defendant to sell intoxicating liquors as a druggist or otherwise,” was consequently untenable, and that motion should have been denied. *State v. Cox,*32 Mo. 566, and other cases cited by the State. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

All concur.