alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED MARCH 1, 2011 

: :.hPARl]vlEMT OF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ; ANSPOH f^iON ^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS i ..7! OFEiiA; IONS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10SW0015 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNo. FAA-2010-1072 

NOTICE OF HEARING DATES 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and 

considered on May 26,2011, inclusive, in the U.S. Tax Court, Room 7006, Casey U.S. 

Courthouse, 515 Rusk Avenue, Houston, Texas 77002. Hearings will commence at 

9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. each day. The parties should vacate the courthouse 

on or before 5:00 p.m. each day. 

Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the 

proper pleading(s)'. Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or 

postal service^. 

SO ORDERED. 

TGoodwm 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

' Materials filed in the FAA Hearing Docket (except for materials filed in security cases) are also available 

for viewing at http://M'ww. regulations.gov. 

^ The Administrator's civil penalty decisions, along with indexes of the decisions, the Rules of Practice, as 

well as other materials relating to civil penalty cases, are available on the internet at: 

http://www.faa.gov/about/offtce_org/headquarters_offices/agc/pol_adjudication/agc400/civil_penalty/; see 

also: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Titlel4/14tab_02.tpl. In 

addition, Thomson ReutersAVest Publishing publishes Federal Aviation Decisions. Finally, the decisions 

are available through LEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw 9FTRAN-FAA database). For additional 

information, see the Web site. 

1 
!:5^AW_t>-jit{ip: ^^H l 

FAA Docket NogfP10SW0015 

(Civil Penalty AJ^OH) 

OiacaNi^liek E COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suited 

/. %'/ 

ot^i^o^^j 

Thomas Newton Boiling, Respondent's Counsel 

Managing Attorney, Regulatory Affairs 

Continental Airlines, Inc., Respondent 

1600 Smith Street, 15* Floor HQSLG C 

Houston, TX 77002 

TEL: 713-324-5606 

FAX: 713-324-5161 

llll' 

•.«( " ' •; ' 

TimDuf^ Complainant's Counsel >. 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel, ASW-7 

Southwest Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham BWd. ' " " ' 

R Worth, TX 76137 . ^5^- - : ; 

TEL: 817-222-5099 

FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, AdititUstrat^ Lm Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. ; 

East Building, Ground Floor, Room E 1Z*320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

•>| -

:jlS»K-

-ft.t 

S^'-' 

"•^l -

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service 

Aviation Administration, 600 Ihdependen 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Cleflc, AGC4M. 

M^ Buildmg--^lBi
7/13/15

Employee Benefits Security Administration

Office of Regulations and Interpretations

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, NW

Room N-5655

Washington, DC 20210

Re: Definition of the Term “Fiduciary;” Conflict of Interest Rule –

Retirement Investment Advice

RIN 1210-AB32

Re: Proposed Best Interest Contract Exemption

ZRIN 1210-ZA25 

Re: Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for 

Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Consultants, Insurance Companies and 

Investment Company Principal Underwriters

ZRIN 1210-ZA25

To Whom it May Concern:

I am the President of the South Dakota Farm Bureau Federation, a member of the Board of Directors of Farm Bureau Life Insurance 

Company and am pleased to provide these comments with respect to the Department of Labor’s notice of proposed rulemaking 

concerning the Definition of the Term “Fiduciary” of an employee benefit plan (the “Proposed Regulation”), the related proposed 

Best Interest Contract Exemption (the “Proposed BIC Exemption”), and the proposed amendment to and proposed partial 

revocation of prohibited transaction exemption 84-24 (the “Proposed PTE 84-24 Exemption Amendment”) (collectively, the 

“Proposal”).

The South Dakota Farm Bureau Federation is a grassroots, statewide organization dedicated to helping South Dakota farm families 

prosper and improve their quality of life. More than 14,500 families in South Dakota are Farm Bureau members, working together to 

achieve farm and rural prosperity. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company is an Iowa domiciled life insurance company that markets 

life insurance and annuity products in the following states: Arizona, Kansas, Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New 

Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Utah, Wisconsin and Wyoming. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company provides 

insurance and financial services to Farm Bureau members and others in rural areas of the West and Midwest that other insurers 

have long since abandoned. 

Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company is a member of both the American Council of Life Insurers ("ACLI") and the Investment 

Retirement Institute ("IRI"). Our management has been working closely with both organizations with respect to comment letters 

those organizations are preparing and will be submitting in response to the above-referenced proposal. We strongly support and 

endorse the positions in the comment letters of both the ACLI and the IRI and ask that the Department of Labor address the issues 

raised in the letters of those two associations.

Sincerely,

Scott VanderWal

President, South Dakota Farm Bureau Federation

2225 Dakota Avenue S. | PO Box 1426

Huron, SD 57350 | (ph) 605.353.8050

(fax) 605.353.8057 | www.sdfbf.org
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0756.html[7/21/2015 11:43:14 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-pybz

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0756

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

We have too may regulations already! NO MORE BIG GOVT!!
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, October 25, 1995 (134), Para 134.5 Calendar Wednesday Business Dispensed With]
[Page 1589]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.134.5  calendar wednesday business dispensed with

  On motion of Mr. NORWOOD, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That business in order for consideration on Wednesday, 
October 25, 1995, under clause 7, rule XXIV, the Calendar Wednesday 
rule, be dispensed with.
```
PSP~ Focus on your business, not your IT ~ 

March 23, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

United States Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Reference: Docket DOT-OST-2010-001B 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

I--amwritffigteexpress-my-.strong-sllppert-f{}l'thefleW daily nonstop~rviee from Seattle tt'r""~- --­

Tokyo Haneda International Airport proposed by Delta Air Lines. 

We provide internet services to over 35,000 Japanese corporations out from our Data Center in 

Seattle. Both our Japanese partner companies from Japan and we travel back and forth between 

Seattle and Tokyo for meetings. 

Seattle should be one ofthe four selected cities for the limited services, as the city has been an 

important and long-standing U.S. gateway for Japan with strong historical, cultural and business 

ties. Washington State is already the most trade-oriented state in the entire country, and a 

popular destination among the Japanese visitors with Ichiro playing for Mariners as well. 

Delta's new service to Haneda wiJI enhance the business and the tourism in the region and 

create direct and immediate economic benefits. 

We realize that Haneda slot opportunity is limited. Our region's travelers look to the 

convenience of flying into Haneda airport not only for the convenience ofbeing right in Tokyo 

but also the convenience of having choices to transit to other regional airports in Japan. The 

Department has the opportunity to ensure that Seattle continues to grow as an important 

international gateway and should approve the frequencies proposed by Delta to serve Haneda. 

We urge the Department ofTransportation to select the Seattle service for the benefit ofthe 

Seattle and Pacific Northwest Region. 

~;mi::::===:::-__ ~~amura President & CEO 

Pacific Software Publishing, Inc. 

1404-14Oth Place NE, Bellevue, WA 98007-3915 USA Phone: (425)957-0808 Fax: (425)957-1188 www.pspinc.com
-----Original Message----- 

From: BAIN@MIamidade.Gov [mailto:BAIN@MIamidade.Gov] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 4:10 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

CONNIE BAIN 

p. o. box 552384 

opa-locka, FL 33055
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2111 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2111

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
   To designate the Federal building located at 1221 Nevin Avenue in 
     Richmond, California, as the ``Frank Hagel Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 1221 Nevin Avenue in Richmond, 
California, shall be known and designated as the ``Frank Hagel Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Frank Hagel 
Federal Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------



     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") by Applied Spectrum Technologies,
Inc. ("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.




Date:  July 27, 2005                         /s/ Mark R. Littell
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Mark R. Littell
                                             Chief Executive Officer



                                             /s/ Mark R. Littell
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Mark R. Littell
                                             Chief Financial Officer
-----Original Message-----

From: Joe [mailto:jpender72@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 8:35 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

It's another sad day in america where politicians and lobbyists continue to strip away our freedoms. One 

day soon we the people will wake up and remove all of you and get back to the freedoms that made this 

country exceptional. I strongly oppose this legislation leave my Livley hood alone .

Sent from my iPhone
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            2446
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      249
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4176
<PP&E>                                           52086
<DEPRECIATION>                                   22950
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   33782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1044
<BONDS>                                          37024
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4286)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     33782
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 10339
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1642
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   8982
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               8982
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (57)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      8925
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   113.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   113.04
        

</TABLE>
#### § 236.530 [Reserved]
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00084

- CV

William D. Layton

v.

City of Fort Worth, City of Fort Worth

Employees' Retirement Fund, and

Board of City of Forth Worth

Employees' Retirement Fund §

§

§

§

§ From the 141st District Court

o f Tarrant County (141

- 265436

- 13 )

December 11 , 2014

Opinion by Justice Meier



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds tha t

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellant William D. Layton shall pay all costs of

this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 28, 1995 (122), Para 122.15 Recorded Vote]
[Pages 1462-1463]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.122.15  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mrs. SCHROEDER: 

       In the first sentence of section 1, strike ``Any 
     application'' and insert ``(a) General Rule.--Subject to 
     subsection (b), any application''.
       Add the following at the end of section 1:
       (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) applies only to--
       (1) any case filed in a judicial district, or a division in 
     a judicial district, that has only 1 sitting judge; and
       (2) any case that is filed in a judicial district with more 
     than 1 sitting judge but is assigned to a judge in any manner 
     other than on a random basis only.

[[Page 1463]]

It was decided in the

Yeas

177

negative

Nays

248
```
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Cirino Cosme, * From the 29th District Court

of Palo Pinto County,

Trial Court No. 17575.

Vs. No. 11-23-00011-CR * September 19, 2024

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J. 

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgments below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgments of the trial court are in all things affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SWARAN KAUR; BALBIR SINGH,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v.

COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY, U.S. Department of the Treasury; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 16

- 15569

D.C. No. 2:14

- cv

- 00875

- KJM

- KJN

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 9, 2017 **

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Swaran Kaur and Balbir Singh appeal pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing their action alleging federal and state law claims arising from

the foreclosure of their property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1 291.

We review de novo. Barren v. Harrington , 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 17 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 15569

(dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)); Dominguez v. Miller (In re Dominguez)

,

51 F.3d 1502, 1508 n.5 (9th Cir. 1995) (dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8). We

affirm.

The district court properly dismissed appellants’ deprivation of rights and

discrimination claims for failure to comply with Rule 8(a)(2) because the

allegations in the second amended complaint were vague, confusing

, and failed to

connect their claims to d efendants ’ conduct

. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (pleading

must contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is

entitled to relief”); McHenry v. Renne , 84 F.3d 1172, 1179

- 80 (9th Cir. 1996)

(affirming di smissal of complaint that failed to set forth simple, concise and direct

averments).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing appellants’

second amended complaint without further leave to amend because the district

court provided appellants with two opport unities to amend and further amendment

would be futile. See Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. , 656 F.3d 1034,

1041 (9th Cir. 2011) (setting forth standard of review and explaining that dismissal

without leave to amend is proper when amendment woul d be futile); Chodos v.

West Publ’

g Co. , 292 F.3d 992, 1003 (9th Cir. 2002) (“[W]hen a district court has

already granted a plaintiff leave to amend, its discretion in deciding subsequent

motions to amend is particularly broad.” (citation and internal quot ation marks3 16

- 15569

omitted)).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief

. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 29, 1995 (123), Para 123.28 Adjournment Over]
[Page 1492]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.123.28  adjournment over

  On motion of Mr. SHAYS, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That when the House adjourns on Friday, October 6, 1995, it 
adjourn to meet at 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 10, 1995, for 
``morning hour'' debates.
```
#### § 236.516 Power supply.

Automatic cab signal, train stop, or train control device hereafter installed shall operate from a separate or isolated power supply.

[49 FR 3386, Jan. 26, 1984]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Ridge Natural Resources, LLC, Calvin

Smajstrla, Christopher Hawa and Wilson

Hawa

,

Appellant s

,

v.

Double Eagle Royalty, LP

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 7

- 00 227

- C V

Appeal from the

109 th District Court

of Winkler C ounty, Texas

(TC# DC17

- 17111 )

O R D E R

The Court has this day considered the Appellant’s emergency motion for temporary stay

of trial court proceedings an d concludes the motion should be GRANTED IN PART as follows

.

The trial court is authorized to conduct the hearing on the pending motion to compel discovery

and to rule on said motion. The Honorable M artin B. Muncy shall stay all other proceedings in

cause number DC17

- 17111 , styled Ridge Natural Resources, LLC, Calvin Smajstrla, Christopher

Hawa and Wilson Hawa v. Double Eagle Royalty, LP

, pending resolution of this appeal or further

order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18 th day of December , 20 1 7

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
§ 350.403 What are the High Priority Program objectives? FMCSA may use the High Priority Program funds to support, enrich, or evaluate CMV safety programs and to: ( a ) Target unsafe driving of CMVs and non-CMVs in areas identified as high-risk crash corridors;
( b ) Improve the safe and secure movement of hazardous materials;
( c ) Improve safe transportation of goods and passengers in foreign commerce;
( d ) Demonstrate new technologies to improve CMV safety;
( e ) Support participation in PRISM by Lead State Agencies: ( 1 ) Before October 1, 2020, to achieve full participation in PRISM; and
( 2 ) Beginning on October 1, 2020, or once full participation in PRISM is achieved, whichever is sooner, to conduct special initiatives or projects that exceed routine operations for participation;
( f ) Support participation in PRISM by entities other than Lead State Agencies;
( g ) Support safety data improvement projects conducted by: ( 1 ) Lead State Agencies for projects that exceed MCSAP safety data requirements; or
( 2 ) Entities other than Lead State Agencies for projects that meet or exceed MCSAP safety data requirements;
( h ) Advance the technological capability and promote the Innovative Technology Deployment of intelligent transportation system applications for CMV operations by States, including technology to detect, and enforce actions taken as a result of, criminal activity (including human trafficking) in a CMV or by any occupant of a CMV, including the operator;
( i ) Increase public awareness and education on CMV safety;
( j ) Support the recognition, prevention, and reporting of human trafficking in a CMV or by any occupant of a CMV, including the operator, and enforce laws relating to human trafficking; or
( k ) Otherwise improve CMV safety.
[85 FR 37796, June 24, 2020, as amended at 87 FR 59035, Sept. 29, 2022]