alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Luda Shuster [mailto:ludashuster@pacbell.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 3:56 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Attention: MHPAEA Comments 

-- What other financial requirements or treatment limitations do plans currently impose beyond those 

listed in the law? How are these limitations or requirements imposed on medical or surgical benefits and 

how are they imposed on mental health or substance use disorder benefits? Are these imposed 

differently to each class of benefit, and do plans vary levels of coverage within benefit categories? 

The most crippling limitation is very small group of mental health professionals who are in-network. My 

observation that it’s caused by two factors: 1) very low remuneration and 2) excessive and stifling 

paperwork requirements. With my (great )insurance I have access to dozens of medical specialists in 

three different clinics, so finding the doctor right for me is not a problem. Compared to that there are 

only 3 psychiatrists available to me in-network – disparity is overwhelming and very punishing. 

Establishing a requirement of having the ratio of psychiatrists on par with let say neurologists or 

endocrinologists available within the network would solve this problem. Also it would eliminate an 

arduous process of searching for psychiatrist. 

 

Regards,

 

Luda Shuster

3495 Ramona St

Palo Alto, CA, 94306
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2259 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2259

         To disapprove certain sentencing guideline amendments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 6, 1995

 Mr. McCollum introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To disapprove certain sentencing guideline amendments.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DISAPPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS RELATING TO EQUALIZATION OF CRACK 
              AND COCAINE POWDER QUANTITIES FOR TRAFFICKING OFFENSES.

    In accordance with section 994(p) of title 28, United States Code, 
Amendment number 5 of the ``Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines, 
Policy Statements, and Official Commentary'', submitted by the United 
States Sentencing Commission to Congress on May 1, 1995, is hereby 
disapproved and shall not take effect to the extent it--
            (1) amends Sec. 2D1.1(c) (1) through (14) of the sentencing 
        guidelines;
            (2) inserts the following sentence in Sec. 2D1.1(c) of the 
        sentencing guidelines: `` `Cocaine,' for the purposes of this 
        guideline, includes cocaine hydrochloride, cocaine base, and 
        crack cocaine.''; and
            (3) deletes ``1 gm of Cocaine Base (`Crack') = 20 kg of 
        marihuana'' from the Commentary to Sec. 2D1.1 of the sentencing 
        guidelines captioned ``Application Notes'' in Note 10 in the 
        subdivision captioned ``Cocaine and Other Schedule I and II 
        Stimulants''.

SEC. 2. DISAPPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS RELATING TO EQUALIZATION OF CRACK AND 
              COCAINE POWER QUANTITIES FOR POSSESSION OFFENSES.

    In accordance with section 994(p) of title 28, United States Code, 
Amendment number 5 of the ``Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines, 
Policy Statements, and Official Commentary'', submitted by the United 
States Sentencing Commission to Congress on May 1, 1995, is hereby 
disapproved and shall not take effect to the extent it amends section 
2D2.1.

SEC. 3. DISAPPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS RELATING TO MONEY LAUNDERING AND 
              TRANSACTIONS IN PROPERTY DERIVED FROM UNLAWFUL ACTIVITY.

    In accordance with section 994(p) of title 28, United States Code, 
Amendment number 18 of the ``Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines, 
Policy Statements, and Official Commentary'', submitted by the United 
States Sentencing Commission to Congress on May 1, 1995, is hereby 
disapproved and shall not take effect.
                                 <all>
```
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0647.html[7/21/2015 8:02:06 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-3ibu

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0647

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: T C

General Comment

I am able to plan my own retirement.If I was smart enough to invest in my 401k and live within MY means, I can

 handle retirement
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-18-00055-CR

JAMES ALLEN JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 273rd District Court

Sabine County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR1607301

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A Sabine County jury convicted James Allen Jackson of continuous sexual abuse of Mary 

Doe, a child younger than fourteen.1 In accordance with the jury’s assessment, Jackson was 

sentenced to life imprisonment. 

Jackson also appeals from his convictions for aggravated sexual assault of a child and 

continuous sexual abuse of Mary’s sister, Jane Doe. Jackson has filed a single brief in which he

raises an issue common to all of his appeals.2 He argues that the trial court committed reversible 

error in admitting e-mail communications with his adult daughter. 

We addressed this issue in detail in our opinion of this date on Jackson’s appeal in cause 

number 06-18-00054-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude in this case that 

Jackson’s substantial rights were not affected by the admission of the e-mails. Accordingly, we 

overrule Jackson’s point of error on appeal. 

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Ralph K. Burgess

Justice

Date Submitted: November 13, 2018

Date Decided: December 21, 2018

Do Not Publish

 1

Originally appealed to the Twelfth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme

Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013). We follow the

precedent of the Twelfth Court of Appeals in deciding this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.

2

Jackson appeals from his conviction for (1) aggravated sexual assault of Jane in cause number 06-18-00053-CR and 

(2) continuous sexual abuse of Jane in cause number 06-18-00054-CR.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 12, 2021

Order 

Clerk

March 12, 2021

162136(68)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 162136

v COA: 346661

Livingston CC: 18-025036-FH

KEVIN WHITE, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time 

for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted 

as timely filed if submitted on or before April 8, 2021.
§ 375.507 Must I determine the weight of a shipment? ( a ) When you transport household goods on a non-binding estimate dependent upon the shipment weight, you must determine the weight of each shipment transported before the assessment of any charges.
( b ) You must weigh the shipment upon a certified scale.
( c ) You must provide a written explanation of volume to weight conversions, when you provide an estimate by volume and convert the volume to weight.
-----Original Message----- 

From: chocochickxoxo@hotmail.com [mailto:chocochickxoxo@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 4:59 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Mariah Foose 

22 North Street, 3rd Floor 

Grafton, MA 01519
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 852 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 852

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 7, 2001

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse to be 
  constructed at 10 East Commerce Street in Youngstown, Ohio, as the 
``Nathaniel R. Jones and Frank J. Battisti Federal Building and United 
                          States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse to be constructed 
at 10 East Commerce Street in Youngstown, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Nathaniel R. Jones and Frank J. Battisti Federal 
Building and United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Nathaniel R. Jones and Frank J. Battisti Federal Building and 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 7, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C.      SECTION 1350**

|   | (1) | Each                of the                Reports fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                15(d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in each of the Reports fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company to which it relates. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                          |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                          |
|   |                                                                                          |
|   |     /s/ Anthony                J.                Alexander           |
|   |                          Anthony J. Alexander    |
|   |                          Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                          March 1, 2006           |

|   |                                                                                          |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                          |
|   |                                                                                          |
|   | /s/ Richard                H.                Marsh                                       |
|   |                          Richard H. Marsh        |
|   |                          Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                          March 1, 2006           |

----
Editorial Note on Part 365
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 365 appear at 66 FR 49870, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 365.101T Applications governed by these rules. These rules govern the handling of applications for operating authority of the following type: ( a ) Applications for certificates and permits to operate as a motor common or contract carrier of property or passengers.
( b ) Applications for permits to operate as a freight forwarder.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) Applications for licenses to operate as a broker of motor vehicle transportation.
( e ) Applications for certificates under 49 U.S.C. 13902(b)(3) to operate as a motor carrier of passengers in intrastate commerce over regular routes if such intrastate transportation is to be provided on a route over which the carrier provides interstate transportation of passengers.
( f ) [Reserved]
( g ) Applications for temporary motor carrier authority.
( h ) Applications for Mexico-domiciled motor carriers to operate in foreign commerce as for-hire or private motor carriers of property (including exempt items) between Mexico and all points in the United States. A Mexico-domiciled motor carrier may not provide point-to-point transportation services, including express delivery services, within the United States for goods other than international cargo.
( i ) Applications for non-North America-domiciled motor carriers to operate in foreign commerce as for-hire motor carriers of property and passengers within the United States.
( j ) The rules in this part do not apply to “pipeline welding trucks” as defined in 49 CFR 390.38(b).
[82 FR 5299, Jan. 17, 2017, as amended at 86 FR 57068, Oct. 14, 2021]
§ 383.53 Penalties. ( a ) *General rule.* Any person who violates the rules set forth in subparts B and C of this part may be subject to civil or criminal penalties under 49 U.S.C. 521(b), as provided in part 386, Appendix B, of this chapter.
( b ) *Special penalties pertaining to violation of out-of-service orders* — ( 1 ) *Driver violations.* A driver who is convicted of violating an out-of-service order shall be subject to a civil penalty as stated in part 386 Appendix B, in addition to disqualification under § 383.51(e).
( 2 ) *Employer violations.* An employer who is convicted of a violation of § 383.37(d) shall be subject to a civil penalty as stated in part 386, appendix B, of this chapter.
( c ) *Special penalties pertaining to railroad-highway grade crossing violations.* An employer who is convicted of a violation of § 383.37(e) shall be subject to a civil penalty stated in part 386, appendix B, of this chapter.
[80 FR 18155, Apr. 3, 2015]
From: Reta Phillips [mailto:cerobb@att.net] 

Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 7:30 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Usurping the right to control private IRA and 401accounts.

I had the opportunity to read about your latest effort to begin to take control of my retirement account because you believe that I am incapable of managing

my own money which I saved and have controlled since my retirement 8 years ago. During those 8 years, I have enjoyed a 17.2% growth in 

actual value

and have taken my forced payouts since age 70 over and above the forced payouts.

I stand firmly oppsed to ANY (do you see that ANY that means none) government meddling with my retirement funds. They are mine not 

yours to manage.

I see this as another letting the camel put his head in the tent govt. takeover. You have stolen from and bastardised social security to the 

point of making

it into a collapsing ponzi scheme. You have screwed up my medical care with your plan to "help" me (my costs have increased 28% over the 

past two

years). You have ruined the post office to the point of bankrupcy. You have increased the welfare to the point of creating whole generations 

of financially

dependent recipients. (Yes, we pay for their breakfasts and lunches at school while the adult uses their food credits to buy whatever they 

want after selling

their cards). You have opened the boarders so we can support illegal immigrants. The government surely is a mass of idiots primarily 

interested in securing

their own employment and welfare.

In summary, the government in general can not manage anything correctly. If you want to work on something work on eliminating the 

department of labor

to reduce the money wasted there.

C. E. Robb

10458 Rieder Rd

Lebanon IL 62254-1370
From: Steve Eckhardt

Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 4:30 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

The government has no business telling me what is in my "best interest" with respect to my 

401k. I am more than capable of doing it myself as are the vast majority of Americans. 

this just appears to be yet another way the government is trying to not only take my money, 

through higher costs and maybe even taxes, but a way for the government to justify control over 

yet another chunk of our economy so you can then use it to generate donations to your party and 

votes for your party. it is disgusting. 

401k's are fine for the vast majority of Americans. Leave them alone.

Steve Eckhardt
-----Original Message----- 

From: TocoLaPiano@gmail.com [mailto:TocoLaPiano@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:18 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Topher Berley 

1700 Sawtelle Blvd. #119 

Los Angeles, CA 90025
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 4/29/15 10:49 AM

Received: April 28, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8ijs-fvl5

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0248

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Sarah McLaughlin

General Comment

In regards to RIN 1210-AB32, I would like to request that the comment period for this rule be 

extended to 120 days. As a compliance Analyst for a small independent broker dealer, I believe 

I, and my firm need more time to analyze how this rule will impact clients, advisors and our 

business practices as they relate to IRA accounts and contributions. 

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481abfcb5&format=xml&show... 4/29/2015
§ 29.102 What information should a Tribe provide to the Department when it expresses its interest in negotiating a compact, funding agreement, or amendment? After the Department notifies a Tribe in writing that it is eligible to participate in the Program pursuant to § 29.100, the Tribe may express its interest in negotiating a compact, funding agreement, or amendment by written request. Such request need only request that the Department enter into negotiations for a compact, funding agreement, or amendment. To the degree the Tribe has the following information available to it, the request may include, as appropriate: ( a ) Whether the Tribe wants to negotiate a compact, funding agreement, or amendment;
( b ) The funding programs that the Tribe wants to include in the funding agreement or amendment;
( c ) The terms the Tribe wants to include in the compact, funding agreement, or amendment;
( d ) Any information or technical assistance the Tribe needs from the Department to assist in pursuing the negotiation process; and
( e ) The Tribal official with authority to negotiate on behalf of the Tribe, the designated Tribal contact, relevant contact information, and, if applicable, the name and contact information of an attorney authorized to represent the interests of the Tribe in the negotiation.
H. Res. 103

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 21, 2002.

Resolved,

SECTION 1. REFERRAL.

Pursuant to section 1492 of title 28, United States

Code, the bill (H.R. 1258), entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of

Sarabeth M. Davis, Robert S. Borders, Victor Maron, Irving

Berke, and Adele E. Conrad’’, now pending in the House of

Representatives, is referred to the chief judge of the United

States Court of Federal Claims.

SEC. 2. PROCEEDINGS AND REPORT.

Upon receipt of the bill, the chief judge shall—

(1) proceed under section 2509 of title 28, United

States Code; and

(2) report back to the House of Representatives, at

the earliest practicable date, providing—

(A) findings of fact and conclusions of law that

are sufficient to inform the Congress of the nature,

extent, and character of the claim for the com-
2

•HRES 103 EH

pensation referred to in the bill as a legal or equitable claim against the United States; and

(B) the amount, if any, legally or equitably due

from the United States to the claimants.

Attest:

Clerk.
**Exhibit32**

** **

CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF PALMETTOBANCSHARES, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

 

Theundersigned, as the chief executive officer and principal financial officer ofPalmetto Bancshares, Inc., certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ended September 30, 2008, which accompanies this certification,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained inthe periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. at the datesand for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and no purchaser orseller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon theforegoing certification for any purpose.  The undersigned expressly disclaimsany obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

 

 

 

/s/      L. Leon Patterson                           

L. Leon Patterson

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

/s/      Paul W. Stringer                                              

Paul W. Stringer

President and Chief Operating Officer,

Chief Accounting Officer 

 

 

Dated:November 10, 2008