alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T:
4

=

:i i

| -

z

J _

| _

| ]

z _

=

= _
<{ ZO

rr

I-.

(I)

<{ <E6

_)

4) m0

i._

I1.

r.o

_m>

!_

4)

(n

.Q0

(..

i._

ILl

4) m

r.

(n0

cJ

Q.

(n

O0

O0

0_

(J

L_
°o_ _ __

Z_ _ "'

_o

z_

0

mS m--

_CO o-

_ • ._ _ i_ t"_

_ _D _" _ _:0 _

_ _o

__. -_

_--

Ec

• _0_

00-- _.

_ _=

i:_ : _ _ii__

r


uo

S "'

_ _

' .._

C_2



E

(.3E0

"0

%

ee

q

O'J
0

0 0

(1)

ml

Z

0

-!

-r

_ E _._ -, ,, =_. -. g_'< g gE

I-' (3 (_

w._-" _" _" (_ (_

G_

O0 _ O_ O_ PO I_3 I_. I_ _ I_ I_ I%1 -=_ -=_ -=_ _ --_ --_ -._ --_ .-_
0

co



0

I-.-

LJ 0

i_.a..

,_._iI._

Z_Z

-6

o9

IZ

oi.-

2_

- ._.,-_o 8 ®

_ _0 0 r-

>,_ _ = _ .-_

"0"-- __ _- _- _

_- c_ ._-_

0 _ _ ,_ _'o _-

__ 0 _ 0 _ "_" "_ _-

_ _ _ ,_'____- o =.__ ".E E

._ _ ® ,,___
oo

m

t_0

rn

/
i
=

=

_=
(:I::

L_0

($I

oo

\®

:\

%

./

e_

=,a t_,

.,.Ib-+'=.

<_

o_ _W

_'__

£N
oF"

_:__) _. (n 9_ _ "_

"_ _) ::T--.--

0_ "_

_--_=_.._ _. •

_N'o _=r-_ .

-Q=,_ _n (P "_ (=_ _ (_ U)

-o

/

/

/

/

1

o
t',.
O0 ii >

go: : _=
/
CO

2_ |=
o::

c_0

w_ C_

<c Q..

U.l

Z3::

l_i21

OZ

%

%


OO

4_
(D r-. 0o

(9 ¢9 ('3

r- 0)

o)0

c

(_ 01

(_ n"C

_) ,m llm

(/) rr' ,<

t_

-r-

!-- 0

(/)
Co
09

_-_ _( ir

, J

:f

1

_.1- ( Z i _ _\--' : l

./ . _. : : \_ _.

..._.7_._.x- / -: ' //yi _ i _/_"_o -

/.m: (9 _" X __

J b _ '7/ Yr" ..sf-._
CO

CO
LU

a. 0

LU

•m .m |m

E>>>

•_ L_ 1._ L_

m .-r" rm_ -_ Q. ,-

._ 4., ...._ :__ _1 !

Ob

O

C_

_p

c_

!


o'_

J_

Co

O0
I_ I_ LID LID I_ _ I_D
_o

I"r_ r" D

lr

0

0

"000

I
L.O
\

\

0

\

0
Q.

(D

_.j

'OZc

•_o

£2,

O "O

ujE_

0_ o_..

_.OMO

\

._

•_- _¢...

c0"_.

,_-'_.__. _ _._

_._

=.E_._

r...__rr ,...

..-._O

-'_o_ • c_-£2 _ _ EV_"

_.>_-o

O.___o

t'o

u')
%

%
l--'

'c_O_ O-

.Jp_

Z_

C_

co

LD

n

1

1

1
(,11

Co | <

m0m -'i0

0 -, "0mo 5"c

Q. -.

'mlC

_I_0_ Q.Nml

m "!_ (DN

::1

_30

C)

mu

"!1

33
)

I

\

\

\

08
(3") 0

] !,,,,...
1

03

¢D
O_
%

0

\J j],],

iJ L[

\
o_

o_
¢0 0"_ 0 '=" ¢_1

o >, _=

"0 l-

"0 ,-- C

'.- O. c t=

G) c_ 0 ,--0 0 0

.J

neD

C"

wllms

E

b.-
_i_ •

(3O

5 "'_ --'1"-"0 "_ q} O_Q_'_' "_ ""

_'o_6_,_, 3_ ,< _ o

• _ _

"_= *© _-'" ("2 <>.'_

_. _o_. _._ ___ c>

"*E(O "_ "_--- __® _o_ __ .

t"7

• (I) 30 :x-O

P39-o3@ _-

J
.... _- -_/ "x

.+.+/n +," \--"_ P++-

,._

+ ONN4

_D
0

o_3..o o_o 3_ _:.._o _0

_.3 _-'® =_©'_'" _'<..- _ _" _ "

_o,o...o _ _._ _.&_ _. ;o,_ o _g

o _S ". 0

-'_(

&g

_ =---®-' -" =3,_

; _ E'_.-_-m o o

¢_ , m_,"

"g r"

Om
\

!000

b,-
rrl

"0

C) rn

C

;o
•

I/

/

0")

0
0

\
W

L_

Q. E

mu

.Q

lU0

a.

t_

.0

"o

...- t_

_D

I-

_E

"oI

U'3
C7_

73

C

-- .-.,_ -_'n_ 0 _'_ _" '_o

_, v _ °- .-z 0

"_ _ 0 _'_ "_ _ _ _.L ___

_o,_ _._ . nQ _=_ © =" --

O

r- _" _ _- oo_

"_ _ ® o,_ ®o.

_ _ _.-_"

_ 0 "_ --'_,i 0 _

_"_--_ _ a) _._"
- !
O0

\

00O

/

Oo


It)

oo
oo

f_

nL_"

__A.m C/_

ml
LL

o

o

<<O0_w_o

I11

0

Ir

:D

0

U)

I1.

Cl

"1-

o

_o

_'

ZZZZ_W_

-r

0 0 _D_o oQ;

0

F0

_L
co

co
X

iu

r_

O_
L

==

Z7zm
###### Editorial Note on Part 365

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 365 appear at 66 FR 49870, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 365.110 Need to complete New Entrant Safety Assurance Program.

For motor carriers operating commercial motor vehicles as defined in 49 U.S.C. 31132, operating authority obtained under procedures in this part does not become permanent until the applicant satisfactorily completes the New Entrant Safety Assurance Program in part 385 of this subchapter.

[80 FR 63705, Oct. 21, 2015]
#### § 214.111 Personal protective equipment, generally.

With the exception of foot protection, the railroad or railroad contractor shall provide and the bridge worker shall use appropriate personal protective equipment described in this subpart in all operations where there is exposure to hazardous conditions, or where this subpart indicates the need for using such equipment to reduce the hazards to railroad bridge workers. The railroad or railroad contractor shall require the use of foot protection when the potential for foot injury exists.

[67 FR 1908, Jan. 15, 2002]
-----Original Message----- 

From: bonnieabowers@gmail.com [mailto:bonnieabowers@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:10 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Bonnie Bowers 

202 Tucker St. 

Healdsburg, CA 95448
Summary of the Independent Director Compensation Program



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 Board of Directors 
 Independent Director’s Compensation 
  

					
	 	 	 Compensation

	 	 Timing of Payment(1)


	 Annual Board Retainer:
  
     Cash
     Restricted Units(2)
	 	  
  
 $30,000
 $50,000
 (number of units determined on
 the semi-annual payment date)
	 	  
  
 Semi-annual payment of all retainers as of January 1st and July 1st

	 Chairman Retainer Fees:
  
     Audit Committee
     Compensation Committee
     Conflicts Committee
	 	 $15,000
 $10,000
 $10,000
	 	Semi-annual payment of all retainers as of January 1st and
July 1st
	 Meeting Fees:
  
     Board Meeting Fees
     Committee Meeting Fees
	 	  
  
 $1,500 per meeting
 $1,500 per meeting
	 	  
  
 Semi-annual payment of all meeting fees as of June 30th and December 15th




	(1)	For newly elected directors, the annual unit and cash retainers are payable pro-rata for the
year of election. Directors who resign prior to a payment date will receive a pro-rate retainer at time of resignation. 


	(2)	Restricted Units are phantom units that vest upon retirement or termination from the Board.
§ 1510.15 Accounting and auditing requirements. ( a ) Direct air carriers and foreign air carriers must establish and maintain an accounting system to account for the security service fees imposed, collected, refunded and remitted. The accounting records must identify the airports at which the passengers were enplaned.
( b ) Each direct air carrier and foreign air carrier that collects security services fees from more than 50,000 passengers annually must provide for an audit at least annually of its security service fee activities or accounts.
( c ) Audits pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section must be performed by an independent certified public accountant and may be of limited scope. The accountant must express an opinion on the fairness and reasonableness of the direct air carrier's and foreign air carrier's procedures for collecting, holding, and remitting the fees. The opinion must also address whether the quarterly reports required in § 1510.17 fairly represent the net transactions in the security service fee accounts.
§ 246.124 Mentoring. ( a ) Each railroad's certification program shall include procedures for the mentoring of persons who have not been certified by the railroad. Each railroad shall identify potential scenarios in which mentoring of non-certified persons will be provided.
( b ) After FRA has approved a railroad's certification program pursuant to this part, the railroad shall not permit or require any person to perform work on a signal system or signal-related technology on its territory that requires certification unless the railroad first determines that: ( 1 ) The person is a certified signal employee who has been certified by the railroad and qualified on all applicable signal system equipment and signal-related technology deployed on the railroad; or
( 2 ) The person is working under the direct and immediate supervision of a mentor or qualified instructor.
( c ) If the railroad elects to classify its certified signal employees into more than one occupational category or subcategory pursuant to § 246.107: ( 1 ) The railroad shall address in its certification program how mentoring will be provided for certified signal employees who move into a different occupational category or subcategory of certified signal service; and
( 2 ) Mentors shall be certified within the occupational category or subcategory of the task being performed by the person or persons working under their direct and immediate supervision.
( d ) If allowed by the railroad's certification program, any work on a signal system performed by a person whose signal employee certification has been revoked shall be performed under the direct and immediate supervision of a mentor or qualified instructor.
( e ) Each railroad's certification program shall address how mentoring will be provided to ensure that mentors are located in close proximity to each person or persons they are mentoring to allow the mentor to take immediate action to prevent a violation of § 246.303(e) from occurring. Each railroad's certification program shall also address how mentors will be held accountable for the work performed by persons working under the mentor's direct and immediate supervision. Any records of tests performed by persons working under the direct and immediate supervision of a mentor shall reflect the mentor's name.
( f ) Each railroad shall adopt and comply with a program meeting the requirements of this section. When any person (including but not limited to a railroad; any manager, supervisor, official, or agent of a railroad; any owner, manufacturer, lessor, or lessee of railroad equipment, track, or facilities; any employee of such owner, manufacturer, lessor, lessee, or independent contractor or subcontractor) violates any requirement of a program which complies with the requirements of this section, that person shall be considered to have violated the requirements of this section.
§ 26.101 What compliance procedures apply to recipients? ( a ) If you fail to comply with any requirement of this part, you may be subject to formal enforcement action under § 26.103 or § 26.105 or appropriate program sanctions by the concerned operating administration, such as the suspension or termination of Federal funds, or refusal to approve projects, grants or contracts until deficiencies are remedied. Program sanctions may include, in the case of the FHWA program, actions provided for under 23 CFR 1.36; in the case of the FAA program, actions consistent with 49 U.S.C. 47106(d), 47111(d), and 47122; and in the case of the FTA program, any actions permitted under 49 U.S.C. chapter 53 or applicable FTA program requirements.
( b ) As provided in statute, you will not be subject to compliance actions or sanctions for failing to carry out any requirement of this part because you have been prevented from complying because a Federal court has issued a final order in which the court found that the requirement is unconstitutional.
-----Original Message----- 

From: jeannette.dugan@cirquedusoleil.com 

[mailto:jeannette.dugan@cirquedusoleil.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:58 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ellen Dugan 

3918 Broken Oak Lane 

N. Las Vegas, NV 89032
§ 299.349 Inspection records. ( a ) The railroad shall keep a record of each inspection required to be performed on that track under this subpart.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this section, each record of an inspection under §§ 299.325 and 299.345 shall be prepared on the day the inspection is made and signed by the person making the inspection.
( c ) Records shall specify the track inspected, date of inspection, location, and nature of any deviation from the requirements of this part, name of qualified individual who made the inspection, and the remedial action, if any, taken by the person making the inspection.
( d ) Rail inspection records shall specify the date of inspection, the location and nature of any internal defects found, name of qualified individual who made the inspection, the remedial action taken and the date thereof, and the location of any intervals of track not tested pursuant to § 299.341 of this part. The railroad shall retain a rail inspection record for at least two years after the inspection and for one year after remedial action is taken.
( e ) The railroad shall make inspection records required by this section available for inspection and copying by the FRA.
( f ) For purposes of compliance with the requirements of this section, the railroad may maintain and transfer records through electronic transmission, storage, and retrieval provided that— ( 1 ) The electronic system is compliant with the requirements of § 299.11;
( 2 ) The electronic storage of each record shall be initiated by the person making the inspection within 24 hours following the completion of that inspection; and
( 3 ) Track inspection records shall be kept available to persons who performed the inspection and to persons performing subsequent inspections.
( g ) Each track/vehicle performance record required under § 299.337 shall be made available for inspection and copying by the FRA.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 25, 2011 

h0718 

Order 

 

July 25, 2011 

142601 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142601 

 COA: 300131 

Wayne CC: 05-006126-01-FC 

MARVIN L. JOHNSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 6, 2011 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 8, 1995 (112), Para 112.17 Calendar Wednesday Business Dispensed With]
[Page 1321]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.112.17  calendar wednesday business dispensed with

  On motion of Mr. ARMEY, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That business in order for consideration on Wednesday, 
September 13, 1995, under clause 7, rule XXIV, the Calendar Wednesday 
rule, be dispensed with.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.28

                        Summary of Director Compensation

      Directors who are not employees of eLoyalty or any of its subsidiaries
("non-employee directors") receive $1,500 for their attendance at each meeting
of the Board of Directors, $2,000 per Audit Committee meeting attended and $500
for each Compensation Committee meeting (each of which generally is held in
tandem with a meeting of the Board of Directors). If any Compensation Committee
meetings are held apart from a Board of Directors meeting, each Compensation
Committee member receives $1,000 per meeting attended. One Director, Jay Hoag,
historically has declined to accept any such compensation for his service as a
member of the Board of Directors or the committees on which he serves. The
Company also reimburses directors for their travel-related expenses incurred in
attending meetings of the Board of Directors and its committees.

      In addition to meeting attendance fees, non-employee directors are
eligible to receive automatic grants of stock options under the eLoyalty
Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1999 plan"). The 1999 plan provides
for each non-employee director to receive: (i) an option to purchase 5,000
shares of eLoyalty Common Stock upon commencement of service as a director (an
"Initial Grant"); and (ii) an option to purchase 1,200 shares of eLoyalty Common
Stock on the day following the date of each annual meeting of eLoyalty
stockholders during which such service continues (an "Annual Grant"). Stock
options granted to non-employee directors have an exercise price per share equal
to the fair market value of a share of eLoyalty Common Stock on the grant date
and a maximum term of ten years. Vesting occurs ratably over a period of 48
months from the end of the month following the grant date with respect to each
Initial Grant and over a period of 12 months from the end of the month following
the grant date with respect to each Annual Grant.

      Mr. Hoag historically has declined receipt of the Annual Grants that
otherwise would have been awarded to him automatically under the 1999 plan.
From: G M [mailto:pdfrguam@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 9:03 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Sir/Ma'am:

I am vehemently opposed to the aforementioned proposed rule RIN 1210-AB32.

It is clear and overwhelmingly evident, as an insurance industry licensed agent --- that the proposed rule will 

have negative consequences for ALL in the industry, and more importantly...the consumer.

One of the many aspects of the negative consequences (and inequity) to the consumer is the integration and 

imposition of a fee structure. The initial ramification to be sure would be mass confusion of information on 

insurance products with the integration and the forced imposition of a fee structure relative to "fiduciary 

responsibility" of all in the insurance industry.

But of prominence is the potential "multitude of unknowns" the new rule will cause. The insurance industry over 

the many years has proven, both quantitatively and qualitatively --- integrity and financial soundness. With safety 

nets inherent already, and with unceasing 'constant process of improvement' methodologies to assure 

continuance of integrity and financial soundness and stability within the insurance industry itself AND more 

critically aging...for the consumer.

Being a Subject Matter Expert within the insurance segment...I respectfully ask that you please consider my input 

in determining the true practicality and feasibility of proposed rule RIN 1210-AB32, and its repercussion to all 

parties involved.

Very respectfully,

GLENN A. MENO

Ph: 671 . 988. 7857

University of Maryland University College(UMUC), Major Field of Studies: Management Studies/Psychology

Comprehensive Consultative Services which include, but is not limited to:

tax reduction strategies * estate planning * insurance * annuities * retirement plans * wealth management * group plans human resource 

management(HRM) consulting * business consulting

executive compensation plans * foundations * philanthropic planning * succession planning * FDIC-insured market-linked certificates of 

deposit(CD) * seminars/workshops

Guam Insurance Lic. #SA 4307 * Guam Insurance Lic. #’SA 2227 * Guam Consulting Service Lic. #13000992257-001

California Insurance License #0615622

THIS MESSAGE, INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENTS, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS 

ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE 

LAW. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this 

communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message. 

Thank you.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, November 1, 1995 (138), Para 138.4 Message from the Senate]
[Page 1822]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.138.4  message from the senate

  A message from the Senate by Mr. Lundregan, one of its clerks, 
announced that the Senate had passed without amendment a bill of the 
House of the following title:

       H.R. 1715. An Act representing the relationship between 
     workers' compensation benefits and the benefits available 
     under the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection 
     Act.

  The message also announced that the Senate had passed bills of the 
following titles, in which the concurrence of the House is requested:

       S. 187. An Act to provide for the safety of journeymen 
     boxers, and for other purposes; and
       S. 325. An Act to make certain technical corrections in 
     laws relating to native Americans, and for other purposes.

  The message also announced that the Senate agrees to the report of the 
committee of conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on 
the amendments of the Senate to the bill (H.R. 1905) ``An act making 
appropriations for energy and water development for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes.''
  The message also announced that the Senate agrees to the report of the 
committee of conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on 
the amendments of the Senate to the bill (H.R. 2002) ``An act making 
appropriations for the Department of Transportation and related agencies 
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes.''
```
---

EXHIBIT 23a

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-33098 and 333-55656) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-10169, 33-26726, 33-38362, 33-44663, 333-44364, 333-59692 and 333-59696) of Cleco Corporation of our report dated January 28, 2003, relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 28, 2003 relating to the financial statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New Orleans, Louisiana
March 17, 2003

---
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyq-tmmk

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2222

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Phil Azzolina

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement