# oEPA United States Environmental Protecti on Agency



## Public hearing scheduled EPA 

### will hold a public hearing from 3 

### to 7 

### p . m., at 

### SlU-EdwardsviUe East St. Louis Higher Education Campus Distance Learning La b , Room 2083 Bui l dingS 601 James R. 

### Thompson Blvd If 

### you need special accommodations to attend the hearing , 

### contact Andrea Morgan a t morgan . andrea@epa.gov b

y

_ ____ _, 

### How 

## to comment You will have an opportunity to make 

### oral comments a t the public hearing. You may also send EPA written comments on Veolia' s pe.nnit renewal from __to**-- There**  

### are several ways to comment (see Pag e 4 for details). 

## For more information You may 

### review th e draft penni! and a documen t called a "Statemen t of Basis , " wh i ch details 

## reasons for the permi t changes. Visit 

### one of these libraries: Cent .ralLlbra ry, 130 1 Olive St, St. Louis. East St. Louis Library, 5300 State St. , East St. l ouis . Cahokia Publi c Library, 140 Cahokia Park 

### Drive , East StLou i s. 

## Facility to urs available Veolia is offering tours of its Sauget facility . To arraoge a tour , contact Doug Harris, 6 1 8-271-2804. 

# Air Permit Renewal Planned for Hazardous Waste Incinerator Veoli.a ES Technic a l Solutions Air Permit Sauget, Illinois 2014 The U.S. Enviroomeotal Protectioo Ageocy plans to reoew a C lean Air Act Tit le V operating permit 

### f or Veol ia ES Techn ical So l utions LLC . The pennit is for a facility at 

### 7 Mobile Ave. tha t stores and burns hazardous waste . EPA is accepting public commeots oo the 

### reoewaJ (see box, left). 

### In addition to emiss i on s limits, wor k prac tice requirements , and monitoring aod 

### recordkeeping require ments f ound in Veolia ' s current pe nm t, the renewed permit would in corporate s om e changes , inc l uding: • Limits on how much arseoio , lead, 

### mercury and other metal s Veolia can put into its i ncinerators - called the "feedrate limits " or " OPLs"

- based on results ofVeolia's perfonnance tests in October 2013. • Enhanced w as te aoalys is p rocedures to eosure com p liance with the me t al feedrate li mi ts . 

# • Temporary ( 12 montb s) i nstallation and opera t joo of

### a spec ial em issi on s monitoring system on each incinerator t o ensur e the feedrate l imi ts 

### are adequate to assur e compliance wi th a pplicabl e emissions limits . 

# • New requirements for emergency 

### generators. Veolia 

### will continue operat i ng under**il~** 

### current permit uoti l EP A either renew s tbe permit or denies the company ' s application. 

## Background The Cleao Ai r Act requires an operating permi t - koown as a T itle V 

### pennit -for facilit i e s th at emit lar ge amounts ofa ir pollution . This permit details t he amount ofpollut ioo the facility can em it aod wha t i t mu s t do to contro l the pollution . A T itle V permit is valid for fi ve years and may be reoewed in fiv e .. year i ncrementS. EPA is sued Veolia's initia l permit Sept. 12,2008. 

### In Jaouary 20 13, EPA began a 

### process to revi se tl>e 

### 2008 permi t, but l ater cho se to simp ly incorporat e the proposed changes into Veo lia 's permit renewal. 

## Polluta nts affected by the permit Veolia 's Sauget fac ili ty em i ts a ,'3Ji ety of pollutants rej.,'tolated by EPA, includiog: • Ca rb on mooox id e. • Nitrogen oxid es . • Su lf ur d io xide . • Fine particles, known 

### as part i culate matter. • Vol atile organic compounds. • Mercury. • Semi -vo latile metals s uch as cadmium and lead. • Low-vo lat i le me t als such as 

### arsenic . . beryllium and chrom ium. • Dioxins and furaos. • Hydrogen chloride. 

## VES009336

### ..... ..,.,.. I I t II 

## I ;.,- l!'ll**Vi~** 

# ""' 

# 00**lltrla Sl** **~** 

# " " f- 

## I**M{I>.AA~ltlll OR((~**  UCUM t • tu'O.OI m rOt 1,'J/.'J 

# "' ' 

# i r"""' '**~.::** ........... I 

# ;;,'lttDN! f • II!( 

## ;.**rr r--** **~**

# ~~ J _L-**~** piOI(RI.fal 

# l tt:N"AATtf: 

# "'"

' ""' I """ l-- 

# "" 1-- 

# """""' f- l A**~.Ut** 

# .-- 

# "'"""' """"" 

# _ ...

# ~~ 1

1 ; 

# r**~~** 

# ... I , ' RaJMll... O N 

# ' l'OA)6 

### I 

### ' Ckt' SQ!l8l ;}l Utl' !OOOO(R 

### I \ {i ASS 

# """ ( 

# ,,. ) OOJOS ( OS. ) 

# J I .,.,.. , 

# .., ""' ' "' ""'**~JC\~.{>(04~** Sl( 04.lY**"' ~~**  l'!ti: O\

-**1'\.QS~** VO.l'lt Mil

---- <o>I III.I$MN HA r uw

-**IIQ( R.Ofr** **~ Ul!l'l.** **·** 

# > PIIMI,j!**~** lQJII W>.$1l' AOfl M\ I**~** UW: $U!MY n.otl 

### Tllis diagram showtl.hc Un i t1 combust ion 

### pro et!Ss. 11te combu s t

lo n 

### pr()(X!.Sse s ofUn l u J un-d 

### 4 tl rc s lf ght l } ' d(QCrcn t, but fo llow s i milar principles. 

## Burning hazardous waste Hazardous waste - which is toxic, flannnable or corrosive and can react with other materials - can be produced by busi nesses or manufacturing operations. Burning hazardous waste , usually in s peci a lly designed incinerators, boilers and industrial furnaces , is one way to safely manage it. Burning reduces waste volume by con verting solids and liquids to ash while de s troying toxic organic compounds. Dispos i ng of the 

### ash in a landfi ll is safer and more efficient than disposal o f untreated ha.zardous was te. The ash from hazardous waste combustion mu> 1 be tested. If

### it is sti ll hazardous, it must be 

### treated before it is disposed ofin a landfill. However , the i ncinerat i on ofwaste can result in emissions of hazardous air pollutant s into t he air . Veo l ia bas th ree hazardous waste combustors: #2 , #3, and #4 

### (# 1 was c lo sed in 1992) . Veolia receives hazardou s waste i n gas , liquid and solid forms . Veolia may store li quid waste in a tank farm prior to burning it Gases occasionally escape from the tanks, and carbon adsorption units are attached to each tank to help control these emiss ions. Veol i a stores bulk s ol id wastes in a building prior to com bustion. The structure is maintained a t negative pressure so emissions don ' t escape. Before tbe waste is 

## 2 bumed it is pack aged into more manageable conta iners and any liquids are absorbed. Veolia bums gaseous wastes in 

### Combustor #2 only . Each combustor has a prima ry and secondary combustion chamber that includes natural gas -fired auxiliary burners u s ed during startup, s hutdown , and ma l function s , and for addi tional beat input. The combustors are also connected to spray dryer absorbers and a baghouse , which help contr ol air pollut ion . Com bustor #4 

### also has a tempering chamber and activated carbon injection to further help control air pollution. Veolia is required to monitor conti nually tor carbon monoxi de and hy drogen chloride emissions. The combustors are augmented by a lime handling system and an ash hand ling system. The lime handlin g sy s tem feeds lime to the spray dry absorber, as lime is an importan t material in Ibis air pollution control technology. The ash hand ling system ensures tl t at 

### ash produced d uri ng the combustion process is collected and properly di sposed of. 

## Changes to the permit A Title V penuit is an enforceable com pila tion of aU operating temtS,**condit on.~**  

### and limitations that apply to an emission source. It 

### is meant to improve compliance by making c lea r t

he Clean Air Act requirements with



# VES009337

### which the 

### f acility must comply. The permi tt ing a

uthori ty ensures requirements that apply to the facil ity are included aod that there is enou g b monitoring and recordkeeping required t o verify tha t the source is in complian ce with permit requirements. EPA, the T itle V permitting authority for the Sauget f acility, is 

### proposing to make changes to and renew Veol i a's ex isting penni!. Proposed cha nges to Veol i a's moni t oring requirements will verify the facili ty i s comp l ying w ith the feedrate limits and that tbe limits will assure compl i ance with the C l ean Air 

### Act (see "Monitoring, ''below). 

### EPA also removed some requirements that no longer apply. For example, an emission l im it previously i ncluded in the 

### permit t o meet federal standards for t he boiler is 

### oo longer a pplica ble beca use B P

A has promulgated new federal standa rds that apply to the boiler. EPA is therefore replacing that emissions limit with the new federal standards for boilers. Se tting the limits Veolia' s pennit includes emission li mits established by the following regu l ations or pennits : • National Emissi on Standards for Hazardous Ai r Pollutants , or NESHAPs , which are standards promulgated under Section 112 

### o f the Clean Air A

c t and promulgated under40 C.P.R. Parts 61 

### and 63. Veolia is sub ject to the NESHAP for hazardous was te com buston; , 40 C.F.R. Pa rt 63, SuhP'•n EEE . • N e w Source Perfonnance Standards, which are emission standards promul gated under the 

### authority o f Section Ill of the Clean Air Act and promulgated under 40 C.F . R. P a

rt 60 . 

### • The Illinois State Implementation Plan, state regulations found at Title 35 

### of the Illinoi s Administrative Cnde, which are approved and made federally enforceable by EPA and codified at 40 

### C.F.R. § 52.720. 

### • Construction and operating permits issued by t he Illinoi s BPA. Most requirements in the current pennit will not change in the renew a

l. However, EPA is adding feedrate limits for cert a

in heavy metals and updating other operating parameter limits as required by f ede ra l regulation s for hazardou s waste combustors. These limits were established using the results o f Veolia's October 2013 

### comprehensive performance test s , an d Veo l ia already is required to comply with the limits under the NESHAP for hazardous waste combustors , the " HWC MACT. " Mo nito r ing I n the proposed revisions to the Title V perm it, EPA is augmenting Veolia's fe< -dstream analysis procedures to ensure compliance with the metal feedrate limits. The 

## 3 proposed enhanced waste ana l ysi s procedures woul d require Veolia to: • Sample and analyze each feedstream accepted for incineration un l ess specitically exempted. • Sample and ana l yze a ll batched, trea t ed, bl ended, mixed or otherwise altered wa s te fo r mercury and o t

her metals in its final fonn 

### as feed for incineration prior to incineration, or perform a mass balance calcul a ti on to determine concentra ti ons in the fina l hatched, treated, blended, m i xed or othe r wi se altered waste. 

### • Not batch, treat, bl end, mix or otherwise alter f eedst ream s which are exempt from s ampli ng unless Veolia samples and analyzes the ot h

erwise exempt feed stream. • Document the concentration of mercury , L 

### VM and SVM in any fuel other than natural 

### gas, including used oil, diese l and alternati ve fuels fed into the incinerators by either ob taining analytical results from each fuel supplier or conduct i ng represent ative sampling of each fuel suppl y and analyzing such samples usi ng appropriate q uality assurance/quality control procedures and test methods. Veolia would follow this procedure at l east once per y ear for each fuel supply. • Document concentrations that fall 

### below the detection l imit in non-exempt feedstreams as equal to the detecti on limit. • Maintain records ofall requi red feedstrearn analyses for five years . EPA also proposes requiring Veolia to 

### tenaporarily install and operate a continuous emissions monitoring sy s t e m , or CEMS , on each ofits three combustion units. Veolia will operate the CEMSs as paramet ric monitoring systems to assess whether the operating parameter limits fo r specific metals are adequate to ensure compliance with federal rules . As parametric moni toring s ystems, th e CBMSs will verify the adequacy of the leedrate limi ts. The systems will test the 

### air emitted during incineration to determine the amount of mercury, semivolatile metal s , low-vol atile metals and other metals emitted , and report results approximately once every 15 

### minutes. The test results will he l p Veolia and EPA ensure th e feedrate limi ts a r e adequate to ensure that the facility can comply with the HWC MACT emissions limits for n1ercury , semi -volatile meta l s and low- volatile metals when comp l ying with i ts metals feedrate l i mits. EPA 

### will require Veol ia to operate the CEMSs on a temporary basis unti l EPA h as enough infonnation to determine if the proposed feedrate limits are adequate to ensure Veolia complies with the Clean A ir Act. Once EPA has collected suffi cient information, EPA will 

### no longer requi re Veo l ia to use multi -metal CEMS s . 

## VES009338' ' 

### Public comments e ncourag ed

The public comment period expires on "' <

"' D

'"' A

-;; T

'" E>

"" . All wrinen comments must be pos!lllarked or emailed no later than . EPA will cons id er all comments before making 

### a tina ! deci sion on tl1e permit renewal . If 

### you submit 

## a wrinen collliDent , include your name and address and 

## all reasonable references, factual grounds and supporting material. Be sure to note wheth er you would like to receive notification ofEPA's fina l decision and i ts responses to comments. There are several ways to submit written comments: By visiting www.regulations . gov - put Docket ID 

### No . EPA-ROS-OAR -2014-0280 intbe sea reb box. 

### By mail 

### to: George Czer niak 

### U. S. EPA Regi on 5 

### (A-18J) 77 W. JacksonB i vd. Chi cago, 1L 60604 

### Public h ea ring details By email to : .John 

### Mooney mooney.john @epa.gov

At the public heari ng you may submit a written statement or make an oral statement. There will be a signup sheet at t he entrauce for those who wish to present oral testimony. Presentat i ons will be given on a firs tcome-first-served basi s . A rourt reporter will 

### record all oral sta tements. Each spea ker w i ll be limited to fi ve to 

### I0 minutes depending on the number of prese n ters. The EPA representative may ask clarifying questions during the oral present ations bur will not respond to the comments at that time .**JOleJau!~>LJI** 

# JOJ pauue1d**1eMaua~** 

# l! wJad J!V

4 069N090911**'Olieo!~O** ' PillS u:>S)f)er M 

### lL (1'81-Y)UO($VIi0 UOUOIP•II 'V JIY 

### suo&ll Aouo6v**UO l~8** **10Jd B1U8** **WU OJ!.I\U~**  

### sa tets pot!un

# Vd3~ VES009339

# VES009340 . pdf

### UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK , NC 

### 2ntt

Beth Brock Team Leader 

### Eli Lilly and Company Tippecanoe Laboratories 1650 Lilly Road Lafayette, IN 

### 47909 Dear Ms. Brock: 

## JAN 27 1.1106



## E F 

# tJ U G OFFICE OF AlA QUAI:. ITY PlANNING

...., STANC>AAOS



### I am writing in response to your request for alternative monitoring described in detail in your Alternative Monitoring Pet i tion (AMP) dated December 2, 2005, wh ich requests alternatives to mon itoring fo r Eli Lilly and Company ' s (Lilly) rotary ki l n, solid-liquid incineration system, also known as the T- 149 incinerator, that burns hazardous and nonh azardous waste. The T-149 incinerator is subject to the National Emission Standards for Hazard o us Ai.r Pollutants from Hazardous Waste C o mbustors (HWC MACT) ru le under 40 CFR 63, Subpart EEE an d the General P rovisions under 40 CFR 63, S u bpart A. The T-149 incinerator i s located at the Lilly Tippecanoe La boratories in Lafayette, Indi ana. The HWC MACT rule requires that Lilly monitor certain operating parameters cont inuous ly, but not the actual pollutants [metals, p articul ate matter (PM), and hydrogen chlori de and chlorine (HCVCJ,)]. However, Section 63 . 1209(a)(5) ofthe HWC MACT allows facilities to petition the Admini strator under Section 63.8(f) of tbe General Provisi ons to use continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) for compliance monitoring ofpa.rticulate matter, mercury , semi-volatile metals, low volatile metals, and h ydrochloric acid/ch lorine gas emissions in lieu of complying with corresponding operating parameter limits. In addition, Section 63 . 1209(g) of th e H W C MACT allows facilities to submit an application to the Administ rator to request approval of altern ative monitoring require ments to demonstrate c ompliance with operat ing parameter Limits mo n itored by parametric instruments. You are proposing to install and operate CEMS for metal s , PM, and HClto directly dem onstrate contin uous compliance with the semi-vol atile metals, low-volatile metals , me rcury, particula te matter, and 

### H CI / CI 2 

### emission limits as an alternativ e to monitoring operating paramet e r li mits that are shown in the attached ta ble . 

## As required by the HWC !v!ACT, you ar e also proposing to ins tall and operate CO and**~** 

### C E MS to demonstrate compliance with the CO emission limit, corrected to 7 percen t oxygen .

ln....,.IM:Iteu ( URL) •**"'-' Jwww-** **QO V** **R~eMd/R..:yctabllt** •Prlm.IIW.tl**V~** O il Bawd In ks M AecyoledPtl* (Mir6num 2 .5% Pos1COI\SurMr) 

## VES009340

## 2 Pursuant to Section 60 . 8(1) ofthe General Provisions of40 CFR 63 and 40 CFR 63.1209(a) ( 5) ofthe HWC MACT, the U.S . Environmental Protection Agency hereby approves your request for the alternative monitoring approach, associated QA/QC procedures, and the backup monitoring conditions as described in detail in your Decem ber 2, 2005 AMP and its associated appendices . The approved alternative monitoring modes and averaging periods are summarized in the enclosed table. This approval is only applicable to the Lilly facility cited above. · If you have further questions on this matter, please contact Dan Bivins at (919) 541-5244 .

Enclosure Sincerely,

# (1.,,;-t~~-~ ConniesueB. Oldham, Ph.D., Group Leader Air Measurements & 

### Quality Group

cc : Steve Friend, Indiana Department ofEnvironmental Management Brent Marable , Region 

## 5 Sarah Marshall. Region 

## 5 Beth Valenziano, Region 

## 5 Ethan Chatfield, Region 

## 5 Pamela Blakley, Region 

## 5 Sam Portanova, Region 

## 5 Bob Holloway, EPA, OSW Tom Driscoll, EPA, OAQPS Barrett Parker, EPA, OAQPS Pe ter Tsirigotis, EPA, OAQPS



# VES009341TABLE 1 . ROTARY KILN I NCINERATOR EXPECTED HWC MACT OPERATING AND E MISS I ON LIMITS 

## : 

# :

. 

# .: 

# )·s: ' . ; / . 

### JI0W**~**

# ....

# M~~ l:STNBLISHED 

# . LIMIT 

# owe MA CT 

### L I MIT 

## AND . 1'lMI: MONITORED IN 

### MtASlJRED 

## Mmll: PAJMMETRIC 

### MODE

! Wns1' S E1 . UNIT**~~~·~** 63, 1 205 G)) .**Houtl)' toft~~**  

# ••• 

# ...**Nuiii'IJIII~dllrilef~** 

# Bi ,

# .. . · N9 NO

Mt;li!NIIII 11..-.., tow tale M

### ~- • U.. 120t {6

_ (2)**Hr:u!ty** ....... 

# ... 

# ... '**~or....-blll~$3..12090)** l!ltli'nlm.....**~****-*N~*****"rdlnQ~** 

# .... 

# ...**~m:li'IOII~tlrislionra** 63.. 1 2-0i(., HWCtMCl HO\If\vfOfltV ... >a 

# ... • wiTJIWiST.£ FEED**~ms.okS-sat** fMd e3.1209 Ul**l'tol.lt; f\1lt'lg~fiGO**  

# ... YES**Mil****lliiNiftiOIII)'kii(!IIM*.Y~Md****U9tfl** 

# F. {." 

# ..... VES 

## • _.,.,·< "" _?

, ' ·**~lftfOfltyNin~'A'Mtt,_,_43..120tO)** 

# ,

# .. YES • 

### . 

# .**~soc~ ~o¥Nit**  rMd rm 83 ,1 :zoi Q ) 

### ... "'*'-"Oft....,...._. "'**tblirltllai~ l:toullydfiQ~**  YES 

# ""'**,.,'""""soc~~r•AI ~t63** **20e(f) A'** OidN~** HOully 1011110 a''*8Qt 

# .... YES**'*"QtiCU'~** 

### iMTil 

### . ' PMIICUIN El'liWofl Liri**$4'1ourl'(illl'l~·~** fl'omlfodl. hcuJ ......... 

### ves NO



# VES009342

## owe MACT LIMIT

l.la't.!IWIII'IICIIICS eordt!! l Oft'lt**~~** ta\101)11**wa~trv<sCMS orfriri~A~m~**  ,., . afld fi '***~** SO'Ubbct tatl k WiiU'I'It (If lew!**~"¥¥'d** I OfN tlllo {Uillor triNrutfi....,Md !MIIiln.lm tuf**~** fb,ot**~'""** .....**HVOr~Sol1e.** tciVM!tf**~$c:rllc:l~~rnM'IUquiCI100M Raa:o(VG** **)Ct** ltlll nimum I IQu\4 & .,...SmM! M OM ll(lorf ralet**~~mw.n.vnUQufd** toO..Rato(iJG)Ot .:inltl\lfi'I I IQo.id6f!Uiflll!ll._gM !bttt81tf 

## HOW EST.MJLISHED AND MEASURED

" 

# ,:, ,**c(--~NI\ ·**  

### AVERAGING TIM ' E

# ,

1 ........



## 2 NO 

### LIMIT 1\fONJTORED 

### INCEMS

MODE

NO

YES NO NO

NO

NO 

### U:IIIIT 

### MONITORED IN

PARAMETRIC 

### MODE

..0 1-..d .. NWnfliq**~****Pcl~~~tnf~Cl~J*$****1** under**~)CIIMlo.C** W.Cl

ViS

NO

YES



# VES009343

# -**$'A ~Qle** 

# ~=**:n.nu.:.~** 

# ,.. NO**niaiotl~** 

# I

_ :

# ~**~** 

# ........

# __ VIS 

# "" 11'08\tllocl 

### "'***~****~f*r****Of"'*CCll''**

## I~ 1 2.**.fli)Ut ~**  ...... 

# ... .....**~ ~'"**  r.,.;**~** ol $\IN

### ~-**.,.-~ -~** 

# ....

# ,. . --....**~** 12-no.r ro1ir1t f;lltf'l9t NO 

# .,. ·:

·.· 

# . 1 >- ·-.- " 

### H 

# we MA 

### CT LIMIT

# t~Mi LIMI T 

## iiril MONrOOUD IN ME .( 

### StiltED



## _ -: :-,**P~RI C** **~** teedt* d l \'1.1**~e** and tolat fee6!olet**~oth '-1¥"1MQU** **-o-riN~** 

# -·**•a.-.~** 

# • .,.. HO 

### vu**~~total** cftl orl,.. .-I cHoridef«d 

## '*'**~t:i tle** **'eotN\** 

# -**1;:.tlour~** _... NO Yl$ MjtlimJm**l)fen~~~e** Olol) wou IN Hljcrl) -Sc:riel**~** o\Wn: l)l dh:tMII\IIl Hourlylli,......,.. NO**~'«< ~$1RG'op**  

# - .:· 

### . 

# . 

# ·· NO 

# ....**Mnl!w.mtlQI.Iid e..s~toChe** **·** 

# . 

# "" .....**Nalol ii\A$01ICitQOnstr'IICifN~~** **~d !M**  . ..a' Nn 

# - ... 

# - waw**~eMS orm-.....n~catt'IIM.,~**  NO 

# ---**~t;~nt\O"...,.. ....-**  

# - Ul'lil.w t 2IBJ;)ciKWCMA.CT



# --**~** 

# . 3.. ,_

:**~SCUCJl** tonltfll Of ... lt)'t\'Oo.Sonlcs SCJ-'\Ibbel' ..... ,.**~of-I'A-tt&ttun**

# ~"'jf**CMI.\or,.......,.~ta14and.,_****tr*im.ICJ\I!Mt** NO VU.WaCMS \;Ink WlltlmtOtll'wt!l 

# -- l iMi**COndiiNtr~lri ni!Ntlt** **QIJidlloO.~Io{VG)'O" A~dl'leldtf\.1"** **Hol.wty~~** ... NO 

# '"**m1n1-11q~** &**ma~flue gg.~**  t ow1'1611i 

# --**H)~u** -.rubber m\Wum LIQIIId to GIP IW.Io (\.JG} or**IIWVn\lm~** &**~** M91itlowtat.f**~dt\tt.sli'UI'I** 

# - Hol.ilrW rdlltiO....,.., NO YU 

# • Th i s l imit i s also a n ildicator of complia n ce 

### with the SVM, L VM , PM, and HCVCI2 emission l i mi ts . NA 

## = Not App l icable C MS 

### = Con ti n uou s M on"oring System



### 3 

# VES009344

# VES009345. pdf

# ALTERNATIVE MON ITORING PETITION FOR THE SOLID - LIQUID INCINERATOR

Ell Lilly and Company Tippecanoe Laboratories 

## 1650 U ll y Road Lafayette , IN 47909 

### October 2 00 5 

### Rev i s i on : 7 . 0



# VES009345E ll Lilly a n d Company Lafa ye tte , I nd i an a

T ABLE OF CO NT EN T S A l te rnati v e Monitori ng P e tit i o n

1 .0 I NT R ODUCT I ON . .. . ..... .. .. . ..................... ........... ...... ....... .... . ..... . .................................... . ... .. .. . 1 2 .0 E NG I N EER I N G DE SCRIPT I O N .... . .... . ....... . . . ..................................... . .............................. . . . . 3 

### 2. 1 KEY COMPO N E NTS . ........ . ... .. .... . ......... . ... . .. . ......................... . .. . ... . ... . .......... . . . ............... 3 

### 2 . 2 SYS TEM OVERVIEW ............. . ........... . ................. . . . . . ....... . ..... . . . ........ . ... . ...... . . . .... . ...... . ... 4 

### 3.0 CA N D I DATES FOR ALTERNATIVE MON I TOR IN G U N DER 

### §63 .8(1) ..... .... .. . ..... . .............. . 6 3.1 PARTICULATE MATTER CEMS .... . ............... . . . .. . . . ...... ... . .... . ... ....... . . .... . ........ . .... . .......... 7 3.1.1 I nd i cator 

### of Performance . . .. . ......... . . .. ....... .. . . ..... . ........... . .... . .... . .. . . . ........ . .......... 7 

### 3 . 1 .2 Meas urement Tec h n iq ue . ... . ......... .... . ... . . .. . .......... . ............. . .... . .. . . . .. . .. . . ... .. . . . .. . . 7 

### 3.1.2 .1 O pe rating Pri nci p l es . . . ... . ........... . . ..... . ...... . .... . .. ... . ... . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . • . .. . . 

### 7 3 . 1 . 2 . 2 I n stallation Location . ... . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . ..... . .. . .. .. . . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . • . .... 

### 9 3.1.2 . 3 In sta l la tion . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . ... . ... . . . . . . • . .. . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . .... . .. . . . . . . . . . . ... .... . .. . .. 

### 9 3.1. 2 .4 In strument Span ..... . ............. . .... . ... . ..................................... . ............ 

### 9 3.1.2.5 System Start Up (In itia l Operat i o n ) ... .......... .... ........... .. ....... .. ........ . .. 

### 9 3 .1 .2 . 6 PM CE MS Calibrat i on Corre l a tion Test ( P M CEMS Cert ification) ...... . ............. . .. . . ....... . .................. . . . .... . .................. . ..... 

### 1 2 3.1.2.7 Routine Opera tion of the PM CEM$ ........... . .. . ...... . ........................ 

### 16 3. 1 .2.8 Component Rep l acemen t. ............. . ... . ........ . ......... . ........... . ............ 

### 19 3. 1 . 2.9 Out of Control .............. . ......................................... . .. . ............. . ... . . . . 

### 19 3.1.3 Use of the P M CE M S for Compliance with t he HWC MACT PM Standa rd ... . ..... .. . . .... . .... . ...... . ....... . ............. . .... ... ... .... . . . . . . ..... . . .... . . ........ . ........ . . 

### 20 3 . 1.4 M o n ito ri ng Frequen cy and A ve raging Time . . ... . . .. . ..... .. . .... . . .... . . . . .. . .... .. .. ... . .. . 

### 20 3 . 1.5 Rolling Block Ave rag e Ca lcula tions du r ing Routine Checks and S ystem Aud i ts . ...... . ......... . .............. . ........ . ........ . ............................ . ..... . .......... 

### 2 1 3.1.6 Backu p to 

### tha Pa rt iculate Matter CEMS .......... . ............................ . ... . .... . .. . .... 22 

### 3.1.7 Deviations from Performance Spec if ocation 

### 11 .............................. . .... . . . ....... 23 

### 32 MUL T I-METALS CEM S .... .......................................... . ................. . .............. . ................ 

### 2 5 3 . 2 .1 Indicato r of Performance ................................................ . ............... . .............. 

### 25 3.2.2 Measuremen t Technlque .................................... . ............. . ............................ 

### 26 3.22.1 Operat i ng P ri nciples ............ . .......... ..... .. . ........... . ......................... . .. 26 

### 3.22.2 I nstallation Locatio n ............ . ............... . ............. . ................ . ........... 29 

### 3.2.2.3 I nstallatio n . .... . ....... . . . ......... . ................... . .................. . ........... . ........ . 29 

### 3.2.2.4 I nstru me nt S p a n ....... . ...... . ........................................... . ........ . .... . ... . 29 

### 3.2 . 2.5 System S t art-up ( In itial Operat i on) . . . . . . .. . .... . . . . .. . . ... . .... . . .. ..... . . ........ 29 

### 3 . 2 . 2 . 6 System S t art-up (Field In stallation) . . . . . .. . ... . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . ........ . .. . ........ 30 

### 3 . 2 . 2 . 7 Performance Speci f i ca tio n Test. . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... .. . . . .. . . . ......... . .. . . .... . 

### 31 3. 2 .2.8 Routine Op e ration of the M u lt i -M e ta l s CE M S ................................ 34 

### 3. 2 . 2 .9 Component R ep l acem e nt .. . .......................... . ................................ 

### 3 7 Rev. 7.0



# VES 009346Ell L ill y and Company Lafayette , I ndia na Alternative Monitoring Petit i on



### 3.2.2 . 10 

### Out of Contro L ............................................................................. .. 

### 37 3.2.3 Use o f the XACT Mu lti Metals CEMS to Dem onstrate Com plia nce with the HWC MACT Metals Standards ............ ... .... ...... .. ............................. 37 

### 3 . 2.4 Mon itori ng F requency and Ave r ag i ng T ime ............ .. .................................... 

### 37 3 .2 . 5 B l ock A verage calculations during Multi-Metals GEMS Da ll y Ch ecks and Ongoi n g Qua lity Assurance Checks .. .... ................................................. 39 

### 3 . 2 .6 Multi-Metals CEMS B ackup ......................................... . ................................. 39 

### 3 . 3 HYDROGEN CHLOR I DE (HCI) CEMS . .. .. .. ................................................................ .. 40 

### 3 .3.1 Ind ica tor of Perlormance ........... . ............................... . ................................... 

### 40 3 . 3 .2 Meas urement Tech n lque ......... ............................... ... ......... ........................... 

### 4 1 3.3.2.1 Operating P rin c ipl es .................. . .................................................... 

### 4 1 3 . 3.2.2 In sta ll at io n Location .................. . ....... ..... .......... . ............................ . 

### 43 3.3.2.3 In s tall ation ...................................................................................... 

### 43 3.3 . 2 .4 In strum e n t Span ............................................ . ................................ 

### 43 3 .3. 2 .5 Syst em Sta rt -tJ p ( I nitial Operat ion) .. ....... .. .. .............. ... ........ ........ .. 43 3.3.2.6 System Start-tJp (Fi eld I n sta ll atio n ) ................................................ 44 

### 3.3.2.7 Performa n ce Specification T est ..................................................... 44 

### 3.3.2.8 Routine Op erat i on of HCI CE M S ........ .... ....................................... 

### 47 3.3 .2.9 Out 01Contro l ................... ...... ........... .. .......................................... 49 

### 3.3.3 Use o f HCI CE M S for Demo nstrating Continuo us Co m plia n ce w ith the HCIIC1 2 HWC MACT Emiss io n Standard ... .. ......... . .................................. 4 9 3.3 . 4 Moni to rin g Frequen cy and Averagi ng T ime .................................................. 50 

### 3.3.4.1 R ol l in g Average Ca l cu latio ns durin g HC I CEMS Dai l y Ca l i bration a nd Ongoing Qua l ity Ass ura nce Audits .... ......... .... ... ... 5 1 3.3.4.2 Rolling Average Calcu l a ti o ns d u ring System Au topu rge ............... 51 3.3 .4. 3 PM and HWC MACT Meta ls Rol ling Average Cal cutat . ions du ring Ecoche m CEMS Da i ly Calibration and Ongoing Q u ality Assurance Audits ............................................................... 52 3 . 3 . 5 Backu p to 

### the HC I GEMS ............................ .. ................................................ 52 3.4 JUST I FICAT I ON FOR REQU E ST FOR ALTERNATNE MON I TOR I NG M ETH OD ................................................. . ........................ ....... . ..................................... 

### 53 4 .0 ALTERNAT I VE MONI TORI NG CANDIDATES UNDER 63. 12 09( g) ....... . ........................... 54 4. 1 STACK GAS FLOWMETER DA I L Y CHECK AND AUTOP URG E ........................ .. .. .. .. 54 4.2 COMBUSTION GAS FLOW RATE OPERATING PARAM E T E R LIMIT .................... ... 54 4.3 CALCULAT I ON OF ROLL I NG AVERAGES WHEN A LL O N E-M IN UTE AVERAGE VALUES ARE NOT AVA I LABLE ................. .. ............................... ............ .. 55 5.0 ALTERNATIVE MON ITOR IN G PETI T ION APPROVAL .................................................. .. . 56 6.0 RE L EV ANT REFERENCES .................................................... . .... . ............... . ...................... 

### 57 ii Rev . 

### 7.0



## VE$009347Eli Lilly and Compan y Lafaye tte , Indiana

FIGURES F igure 1 . Block Flow Diagram of Solld - U quid Inci nerator F i gure 

### 2. Sigrist Particulate Matte r CEMS Figure 

### 3 . T149 CEMS Data ExChange Fig ure 4 . Multi - Metals CEMS (XACT) F ig u r e 

### 5. Ecochem CEMS (HCI) Fi g u re 

### 6. Ecochem Dyn amic Sp i king Overvi ew

TABLES Al t ematlve Monitoring PetiUo n

Table 

### 1 . Rotary Kil n In cinerator HWC MACT Op erati ng and Emission Limits

APPENDICIES Appendi x A: EPA Draft Guidance Documen t for PM CE M S Appendix B : XACT M ulti-Metals CEMS Guidance Documents, Perlo rmance Specifications , and Qu a l i ty Assurance Docu ments Appendix C : H CI CEMS P e rformance Specification , HC L CEMS Q u ali ty Assurance Docume nts Appendix D : Ctted Pe rf orma n ce Specifications a n d Oua l tty 

### Assurance P rocedure s

Ill Rev. 7.0



# VES009348E li Lilly and Company Lafayette, I ndia na

1 . 0 INTRO D UCT IO N Alternative M onHo rlng Petition

Eli Li lly and Company (Li ll y) operates a rotary kiln i n cinerati o n syste m l ocated at the Li ll y Tippeca noe Laboratori es in Lafayett e. Indi a na. T h e rotary ki l n 

### is refe rr ed t o as the solid - l i q uid i n c ine rator. The solid· l iq u id in c i ne ra tor i s used to bu m hazardou s and n on- h azardo us so l . i d wastes and hazardous liqu i d wastes . Th e solid-l i quid inci nerator is subject to req u ireme n ts of the haza r dous waste co mb u stor maxi mum achieva bl e contro l techno l ogy (HWC MACT) ru l e u nd e r 40 CFR 63 Subpart EEE and t h e Ge n eral Provisions under 40 CFR 63 Subpa rt A . The HWC MACT places cons i de rable em p has i s on con tin uous monitoring for d emons t rating comp li ance wi t h applicable emission standa r ds and operatin g pa r ameter li m i ts. 

### As such , facilit ies are requ i red 

### to Insta ll co nti nuous emissio n mo n ito ri ng systems (GEMS) that conti n uous ly monltor a n d reco rd emiss i on data and contin u ous paramet ri c mo n itoring systems ( CPMS) th at continuous ly mon i tor and record o p erating data. Section 63.1209(a)(5) of the HWC MACT allows facilities to petition the Adm in istrator under Sectio n 63 .8 ( 1) of th e Genera l P rov i si on s to use GEMS for compl i ance monito ri ng for pa rt i cu l a te matter , mercury , sem ivolati l e metals. low vola ti le meta l s. a n d hyd r ochloric acid/chlori ne gas i n li eu of complying w ith corresponding ope rating parameters. Section 63 .8(1) o f 

### the Genera l Provisions all ows fac ilities to request approval of an alternative mo n ito ri ng petition 

### to use attemati ve GEMS 

### to demonstrate compliance w i th th e app li cable MACT requireme nts. I n add ition , Section 1209(g) o f t he HWC MACT allows facilities 

### to subm it a n applicat i on to the Admi nistrator to req u est approval of alternative m on itori n g requi re ments t o docum e n t comp l iance wit h operating lim its mon itored by parametric i nst ru m en t s . 

### As requ i red by the HWC MACT, Lil ly will Install a n d operate a CO and 

### 0 2 CEMS to demonstrate comp l iance 

### with t he CO em i ss i o n li mit. corrected to 7% oxygen . Li ll y is a l so proposi n g to in stall and operat e GEMS for m ulti -metals , particul ate matter, and HCI to de monstrate ana i nme nt with the semivo l atile metals. low- volatile metals, mercury, particulate matter, and HCI/C iz emission**mils.** Pursuant to Secti o n 63. 1 2 09 ( a)(5) of th e HWC MACT , Li ll y will not 

### be req u i red to use CPMSs to con tinuous l y moni t or operating parameters identified i n Section 1209 of the HWC MACT when CEMS are 

### used to demonstrate compliance with the meta l s , particulate matter, and HCV C 1

2 HWC MACT emission stan da rd s. H owever , when 

### the CEMS a r e not in use , Lilly will operate CPMSs to monitor and demonstrat e comp l iance wit h the correspo n d in g operating parameter lim its (OPLs) to avoid s h utti ng down h azardous waste feed to 

### the sOl i ds-l i q u ids i n ci nerator. Table 1 provides a summary of wh i ch HWC MACT standards will apply while op erating the a lt ernative CEMS (CEMS mode). and which operati n g param e ter li m i ts win app l y when a C E MS are not i n use (parametri c mode) .

Rev. 7 .0 

## VES009349

### Eli Lilly and Company Lafayette , Ind i ana Alternative M onitoring P e titio n U ll y s ub mi tted an earlier version o f this Alt ernat ive Monitoring Petit i on to EPA in c onjunction w ith the Comprehensive Performance Te st Pla n in Septembe r 2003 to address alternative requests u nde r Sect io n 

### 40 CFR 

### 63.8 (1) Use of an alternative monitoring method and 

### 40 CFR 

### 63.1209(g) Alt ernati ve monitoring requirements other than continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS). EPA responded to 

### the majo rity of the parametric m onitoring req uests under 

### 40 CFR 

### 63 .1 209(g) i n a l etter dated February 

### 27 , 

### 2004 which was s ign ed by George T. Czerniak , C hi ef of the Air Enforceme nt 

### and Comp l iance Assu ran ce Bra nch, EPA Regio n 5. Therefore, those Section 1 209(g) parametric mo n ito rin g re quesls formerly i n Section 

### 4.0 of 

### this docu ment add ressed by EPA's February 27 , 2004 letter have been removed from this rev i s ion of the Alternat i ve Mon itoring Petition .



### 2 R e v . 7.0 

# VES009350

### Ell U ll y and Company L a

fay e tte, I ndia na A lte rn a tive Mon itori ng P e titi on



### 2 . 0 E N G IN EERI N G DESCR I PTION The key components o f the so li d-liq ui d i nci nerator are described below. The Comprehens ive Performan ce T est (C PT) P l an for th e s olid -l iquid incin erato r provi des a mo re deta i led engi nee ri ng descri ption of t he Incinerator.



### 2. 1 KEY C OMPONENTS T he fo U owing a r e the key com p onen ts of t he sol id-l iquid i ncinerator: Waste Feed SVstem The waste feed system I s des i gned to feed so li d a n d l i quid wastes to the rotary kil n , and l i quid wastes to t h e secoodary combustio n chamber (SCC). Ro t ary Ki ln - T he rotary ki . l n i s a refractory-l i ned cyl in der that rotates w hi le in cinerati ng so l id and li qu id wastes. Wet Ash 

### Handljno Svstem- Hot, dry ash from t he rota ry kiln is coo l ed and has mo i sture added in t h e wet as h h and l ing syste m . Ye rtjca l Up-Flow 

# sec - The combustion gases from t he rotary kiln e n ter 

### the 

# sec w h iCh i s designed to com pl ete t h e combusti on of the gases fro m the ki l n , a nd to bum primary liquid ( h igh BTU conten t ) end secondary Li q u id (low 

### B T U co ntent) wastes. 

### NO. Abateme nt Svstem - The hot co m b u st ion gases e nt er the se lective no n-catalytic red uctio n (SNCR) system w hi ch uses u rea I njecti on to reduce NO , em i ssio ns. T he NO, Abateme nt System 

### does not meet the reg u latory defin i tio n of a low o r a**hig h-** **~mergy** 

### wet scrubber a n d t he operatio n of t h e N O , abatemen t system Is not regulated b y the HWC M ACT regu l ations. Oueneh - The comb u stion gases from t h e NO, abatement system enter t he quench where the comb u stion gases a re cooed to their adiabatic saturat ion temperature . Th e quench 

### is n ot des i gned nor in te n ded to be an air po llutio n control device. T he qu e nch d oes not m eet the regul atory defi nition 

### of a low or a hig h energy wei scrubbe r and t h e operation of th e quench Is not regu l ated by the HWC MAC T regulations. C o nde n ser/Absorber - T he combustion gases from th e q uench enter the coodenser/a bsorbe r where the gases are cooled to be l ow th eir ad iabat i c s a t u ration t emperatu re . The condenser/absorber provides 

### 3 

### Rev . 7.0 

# VES009351Ell Lilly and Company Laf ayette, Indiana Alternative Monitoring Pet iti on additiona l condition i ng o f the co m bustion gases exiti ng th e q uen c h . The condenser/ab s orber i s considered a low energy wet scru bber accord in g to the HWC M ACT regu l ations Hydro§onic"' Scrubber - T h e combust i o n gases 

### from the conde n se r/ absorber ente r the Hydro-Son i c scrubber where particu l ate and m e ta l s are r emoved from 

### the combustion gas stream . Removal of acid gases is a l so provided . S team i nj ect i o n can be used to enhance th e particulate r emoval . The HydroSonic scrubber Is considered a h i g h e ne rgy wet scrubber according to the HWC MACT regulati ons A b l ock flow diag ram 

### ol the**sot id** **iquld** In cineration system i s provid ed in F i g ure 1 .



### 2 .2 SYSTE M OVERVIEW The i ncineration system i s desig ned t o combust s ol id as well as primary and secondary l iq uid wastes. Solid wastes are fed throug h the so l id waste feed system o n th e rotary kiln. Liquid wastes ca n be fed to both 

### the rotary ki ln an d 

## sec. The comb u stion gas from the treatme n t of th e wastes is trea ted i n a wet ai r pol l ution con trol (APC) system co n s i s ting of a 

### NO, abatement system, a fu ll q ue nch , co nden ser /a bsorber , Hydro..Son ic scrubber , and stack . An in duced d raft fan i s the combus t ion gas pri me m ov er. The f un ctio n of the quench i s to adi abatically 

### cool the combusti on gas via saturating water sprays. The quench consists of a vertica l . cylind ri ca l , brick· ll ned ch ambe r. Fresh and rec i rcu l at i ng water i s sprayed t hrough que n ch nozz l es to ad ia batica l ly saturate and cool the i n let combustion gas . Sat urated combustion gas from t he quench enters the l owe r po rtion 

### ol the condenser/absort>er. Combustio n ga s flows up t hrough t he packed section . Recirculated water i s i ntrod uced to the top of t he packed section a n d fl ows coun te rcurrent to the combustion gas flow for additional comb u st ion gas coo li ng and condition i ng. Comb u stion gas from the con d ense r/absorber flows to th e Hydro-So n ic scrubber. The Hydro -Sonic scrubbe r removes fine particu late maHe r by in ert ial i mpaction . Parti cu l ate remova l efficiency 

### is a function of the pressure d iffere nti al aaoss 

### the Hydro-Soni c scrubber. T he d ifferentia l pressure i s dependen t on t he flow of combustion gases and water through 

### the Hydro..Sonic scrubber. T h e comb u stion gas flow changes w i th cha n ges in t he I ncinerator condiUons. The water flow to the Hydro-Sonics scrubber Is a co m bination of recircu l ated water a nd ma k eup water. Steam injec ti o n can be used t o enha n ce t he particu l ate r emoval of the Hydro-So nl cs sc rub ber.



### 4 Rev. 7.0 

## VES009352

### Ell Wily and Company L a f ayet te , Indiana 

### Alternative Monitoring Petiti o n An induced draft 

### ( 1 0) fa n d raws t he combustion gas throug h the comb usti on c h amber and 

### APC system and d i s c h arges the gases thro u g h an FRP (or equ iva l ent) stack conslructed w ith samp li ng 

### ports and p l atfO<ms.



### 5 Rev. 7.0 

# VES009353

### Eli L illy and Company Lafayette, I ndia n a 

### Alternative Mon i t ori ng Petit io n 3.0 CAND IDA TES FOR ALTERNAT IVE MON I TORING UND E R §63 .8(f) Lilly i ntends to Install a n d operate a particu late matter GEMS, a**multi-metal~** 

### GEMS, and an H G I GEMS to demoostrate**comp ian~**  

### with the particulate matter, m eta l s, a nd HGI/G 1 2 

### HWG MAGT em i ssioo standards . 

### As previou s ly stated, 

### Section 1209(a)(5) of the 

### HWG MAGT allows Li lly to petition the Administrator under Sectio n 63.8(f) of the General Provis i ons to use GEMS fo r**compl an~**  

### moottoring for particu l ate matter, mercury, sern i volat i le meta l s, low volatile metals , and hydrochloric acid/chorine gas I n lieu of complying with the correspondlng HWG MAGT operating parameter limits. As required i n Sectioo 63.8(f) , t h i s application m u st conta i n a descri ption of the proposed alternative mon it oring system and address the four elements contai ned I n the defin ition o f montton n g I n Section 63.2 of 

### the General Provisions. Those fou r e l ements a re as follows : 1) lndlca tor(s) of Performa n ce: The parameter or parameters you measure or observe fo r demonstrati n g proper operat ion of the poll utio n control measures or comp l ia nce 

### with the ap p l icable emissions li mttation or standard . Indicators of perfo r mance may I ncl ude di rect or predict ed em issio n s measureme nts an d may be expressed as a s i ngle maxi mum or mi n imum 

### val ue ; 2) Measu rement T echn lques: The 

### means by wh i ch yo u gath er and record information of o r about the i n dicators o f**performan~.** 

### The compo nents of th e measureme n t techniq ue incl ud e 

### the detector type, location an d I nsta ll ation specifications, Inspection proced u res, and qual ity ass u rance and qua lity co nt ro l m easu res ; 3) Monko ri ng Frequency: Th e nu mber of times yo u obta i n and record monttoring da ta ove r a specifi ed t i me i nterval. Examples of mon itoring frequenc i es include at least four points equally**sp~** 

### for each hou r for GEMS ; and 4) Averaging Ti m e: Th e period over which you average and use data to verify proper operation of th e po ll utio n contro l app roach or comp l iance wit h t he em lssioos lim i tation or s ta n dard. Pursua nt t o Secti on 63.8(f)(4)(i i) , 

### the application must also con tain a performance eva l uation test pla n (PETP) if req u ested. The detailed I nformatio n contained i n th is petitio n meets th e requirements of 4 0 GFR 63.8(e)(3)( i ) which speCifies th e i nformati on t hat m ust be conta i ned i n a GMS PE T P . Therefore, the PETP r eq u irements for the part i c u late matter GEMS. the m u l ti - metal GEMS, and the HG I GEMS are met through s ubmissio n of the detailed alternative monitoring petition .



### 6 

### Rev. 7.0 

# VES009354

### Eli L illy and Company Lafayette, Indiana Alternative Moni to rin g Petition I n add ition , Seclion 3 .4 of this alternative mon it O<ing pet ition i ncludes infonnati o n j ustifying the request for an alternati ve monitoring method, such as t h e techn i cal or econom i c unfeasibility , or the i m pr actica l ity , of the affected so u rce using the required method. Th i s meets the requi r ements of Section 63.8(1)(4

### )( li ). 3 . 1 PARTICULATE MATTER CEMS 

### 3 .1 .1 Ind icator of Performa nce T h e particu l a te maHe r CEMS is designed to con tinuo usly mo ni to r the stack gas particu late matter concentrati on . Comp l iance wi th the particulate HWC MACT em ission standa rd i s de monstrated w h en 

### the particulate matter measu red stack concentration is less than or equal to the app l icab l e standard. Current l y , Lilly m u st comply 

### with 

### the i nte rim PM standard of 34 mg/dscm , corrected to 7 percen t oxygen , specified under Section 63.1203(b) of th e HWC MACT. Lilly 

### will comply with the HWC MACT flnal PM standard specified i n Section 63 . 1219(a) no later than th e d a t e requ i red by Section 1206(a)(1)(i i ) of 

### the HWC MACT F in al Repla cement Standards. The ave r aging time for both the i nteri m and fina l PM standard is a 6-!1our ro i li ng average, updated every hour. 3. 1 .2 Measur e ment Technique 3. 1.2 . 1 Operating Pri n cip les The total particulate 

### mass conti n u ous emiss i on monitoring system Is a Sigrist Dust E miss i on M eas uri ng Sys tem CTNR (o r equivalent) , manu1actu red by S i g r i st Process-Photometer, AG. T he Sigrist system is intended to measure particle mass concentratio n from the I nci nerato r stack . It 

### wi ll withd raw a represe n tative sample of the exhaust from the stack and tra nsport it, 

### via the S i gris t ring pipe, for meas ure ment by the photome ter. The samp l e tra n sport system main t ains samp l e stream temperature at approxi mate ly 1 60 

# •c (320 

### Of). A portion of the sample stream is separated (redu c i ng orifice) and meas u red by the photometer. 

### then merged back I nto the ma i n sample stream for transport back into the i ncinerator stack. A data acq uis iti o n system co l lects particle measurement data from the photometer thro ugh the S igrist Controller. F igures 2 and 3 Illustrate the major components of the S i grist GEMS, which 

### i nclude: 1 . Sample Ext raction System 

### 2. Photomete r 3 . Syst em Controller 

### 4. Data Acquisition System (DAS) a n d H iS torian



### 7 Rev . 7.0 

# VES009355

### Eli Lilly and Company Lafayette, I ndiana 3.1.2.1 . 1 Samp le Extraction System Allemativ e Mon i toring Pet itio n

The Sig ri st sample system cons i sts of a samp l e p.-obe and ri ng pipe. T h e sample probe size was selected by the manufacturer to provide an i n l et gas velocily that I s app.-ox l mately 1.0 - 1.5 tim es greater tha n the norma l stack gas velocity when sampling a t th e preset (desig n) rate 

### of approximately 1 acmlmin. Th is s u per-lso k i netl c operating cond itio n Is used to min i m i ze particu l ate measureme nt error that ca n be significant at sub-isoki netic cond iti ons . The super-isokinetic condition is an alternative to continuous mon itoring of the stack gas ve l ocity and adj ust me n t of the sampling r ate in order to mainta i n isol<inetic conditions. St ack gases are transferred through a ri ng p i pe where the gas i s cond itioned by heati ng to approximately 160 

# •c (320 ° F) to vaporize any water and acid droplels t h at may be present I n th e gas stream. A slipstream of the sample 

### gas Is extracted for ·continu ous• analysis by the phot ometer. which 

### is also heated to 

## 1so•c and ke pt at a consistent pressure. Alle r ana l ysis, t he slip stream gas passes through a 

### flow measurem en t vent uri and retu rn s to the bypass sample gas stream, which i s forwarded by the blowe r , to the sample r eturn prob e in t he stack . 3 . 1. 2 . 1 . 2 Photometric Analysis The PM analys i s is performed by t he phot ometer which measures the attenuat i on i n forward light caused by the PM prese nt In the sample gas . The ph otometer meas u res forwa rd lig ht scattered at 15° from an incandescen t b ul b emitti ng over the ra ng e of 360 to 2800 nanometers. Dua l beam compensation is used in which the l ig ht path Is spl it a nd the I nte n sity of th e r eference path I s adjusted by an attenuator to equa l the i ntensity of th e meas u remen t path . The sample and refere nce scattered l i gh t a re combined ahea d of a photocell , wh i ch generates a photoelectri c s i gna l that is proportio n al to the concen tration of PM In the samp l e stream. The i n strumen t response ti m e is app.-oximately 5 seconds. The photoe l ectric signa l 

### is amp l ifi ed t o 4 to 20 milliampere 

### (rnA) a nd output to the data acqu isition system ( O AS) o n one of four avai l ab l e channels acco rd i ng to 

### the in creas ing leve l s of i ntensity associated 

### with increasing PM concentra tion. An automati c sw itch i ng device 

### operates re l ays to b l ock a sig na l b e i ng sent from the other three chan ne l s . The system can a l so ope rate in a s in gle oc l ocked range. The nominal PM conce ntrations associated w ith the fo u r meas urement leve l s are**~5 .**  

### 0 - 1,**~.2 ,**  

### and**~.05** 

### PLA based on a polystyrene latex aeroso l (PLA) used i n factory cal i brat io n of the mo n it or. The monitor's output sig nal, howeve r , is a l ways a si ngle curre nt val ue In the 4 -20 mA range. 3 . 1. 2. 1.3 System Controller Th e S I GAR 4 000 co ntr oller , or equiva l ent, is the connect i ng l i n k between the photometer, the sample transport system, and 

### the OAS. 

### It communicates w ith 

### the photometer, and p rocesses and disp l ays t he 

### 8 R ev. 7.0 

## VES009356

### E li U lly and Co mpan y Lafayette, Indi ana A lt e rn ative M on itorin g P et ition partlde mass reading signal. The SIGAR controller operates the sample transport system va lves . heaters , blowers , and temperatu re se n sors. 

### The controlle r o u tputs c riti ca l system I nformatio n indudl ng the real· ti me mass read i ng, sample transport system te mperatures. and contro l ler parame ters . It stores all the th re s h old parameters fo r the S i grist p h otomete r. It provi d es relay contact I nput a nd outputs to signa l photomete r and sample transport system status. It 

### provi des the user i nterface for photometer and controller parameter setup and pre891'Vat i on. 3 .1.2 .1 .4 D ata Acqui s ition Sys t e m a nd H istori a n The Sigrist micro co ntroller provides system operation , status , i nstrument outp ut, and range identifiCation to a compute r ized DAS. The DAS performs all data calcu lations for compliance . All data , system operation, status. and quali t y assurance data are stored i n a hist orian . 3 . 1 . 2 . 2 In sta ll atio n Lo c ation The S i g ri st PM CEMS will be located at a point In the stack that allows a represen t ative sample to be e x tracted for subsequent ana l ys i s . Thi s location will be a t least 

### two duct d i ameters from the top of the 

### stack , and at least two d uct d iameters dow nstream from the l ast poin t of i nterfe rence. The fina l PM CEMS l ocation**l** 

### be de term i ned duri n g the correlation test. 3.1 . 2. 3 In stall at io n The PM CEMS will be i nstalled per manufacturer's recommendations. The C E MS will be installed i n a locatio n such that the correlati on between the 

### PM CEMS response and emissions determined by a reference method wi ll meet the perfOITTla n ce spedfications stated in this document. Once the system is installed, it will be comm issio n ed for use. This exerci se will verify the 

### system Is Installed properly per t h e manufacturer's spedfiCS tion . 3 . 1. 2 .4 I n stru m e n t S pa n The operating range o f the PM C E MS will be established during the CEMS initia l startup and cor relat i on t est pla n period . Lilly w i ll verify that the operating range ( zero to span) 

### will encompass the response of t h e PM CEMS fo r all expected waste streams. 3. 1.2 . 5 Sy ste m Sta rt Up (Init i a l Operation) The S i grist will be started and allowed to run using ambient air i n the sample li n e. A va lve , located at the probe, allows Li ll y to start the system 

### with amb i en t a i r as opposed to ftue gas. The 

### system will r u n on ambient air for approximate l y fo u r wee ks. Du ring this time , Li ll y wi ll check the operati on of the system and co rrect a ny i ss u es th at arise.



### 9 Rev. 7.0 

## VE S009357Eli L illy and Company L afayette, Indiana 

### Alternative Mon i toring Petition After thi s approxi mate fou r-week pe riod, Li lly will s ample 

### the 

### ftue g a s u n der different feed condition s (surrog ate materi al , l iqu id waste , so l id waste , natu r al gas, fue l oU). U lty will sample fl ue gas for app roximately 

### 4-8 wee ks . Th e objective i s to correct any iss u es that arise, and be gi n to compare the type of w aste b u rn ed to the outp u t of th e S igrist. Unea ri ty checks will begin du r ing th i s phase o f the 

### PM CEMS operatio n. The l inearit y che ck Is a procedure which chec k s th e I ns tru ment drift a t 

### fi ve levelS.**h** an inst r u m e n t response range o f 

### 4 to 20 milliamps, lhe l inearity test checks t he instrument drift at approxi mat ely 

### 4, 5, 8, 12

. . and 16 m i lliamps . The perce nt d ri ft w i ll b e ca l c u l ated 

### as :

w he re: Percent Drift= 

# !Ra ..cs - R R£,. 

# I"'00 

## Span

Percen t Drift = Amo unt of drift 

### (%) Rw .s = T he measu red PM CEMS response (rnA) 

## R.... = The 

### PM reference sta n dard va l ue (rnA) S pa n = Span of 

### the i nstrume n t (20 rnA) 

### 3 . 1 . 2 .5 . 1 Prelim i nary Correl ation T est 

### Plan Period The i nten t 

### of the pre l im in ary COITe l atio n test p l an peri od ( P CTPP) d uri ng 

### the PM CEMS s tartup 

### is to : 

### (1) understa nd the affect 

### of sp e c ifi c materia l s (surrogate materia l and/or haZardous waste) on the response of the Sigrist PM CEMS 

### (2) establ is h a p relimi n ary correlation to predict parti c u l ate mass in terms o f mg/scm, based o n the output o f the PM CEMS. 

### It is expected tha t 

### the PCTPP wiD take up to 1 6 wee ks .**Acliv~ies** during the PCTPP w i ll follow guidance in 

### 4() CFR 6() Appe n dix 

### B, Performa n ce Specificati on 

### 11 (PS1 1 ). The fo ll owi n g activ'itles will be conduct ed during 

### the PCTPP : Seye n-pay Prift: Prior to beg i nn i ng the PCTPP , the PM CEMS will h ave p as sed 

### a seven-day drift 

### test . Fo r seven consec u ti ve days, the li n earity 

### check will 

### be completed. Th e percent drift a t five l evels 

### vA ll be recorded. Each va l ue must 

### be wi thi n 

### 5% o f t h e refere nce va l ue . Reference Method: Duri n g the PCTPP, U l ly will use Method 

### 5 o r Method 

### 5l as the reference method. Lilly will use dua l trains (perpend i c u l ar tra i ns) 

### f or the re f erence meth od ( RM ) sampl i ng . The targets a r e SO-minu t e ru ns . S horter or l onger runs may be nece ssary. For examp l e , for high particu l ate load in g, the 10 

### Rev . 7 .0 

## VES009358Eli Lilly and Compa n y Laf ayette, I ndia na AHernatlve Mon itor in g Petition test runs may only 

### be 45 minu t es due to excess i ve pressure drop across the filter, and for very l ow particulate loadi n g, test runs may 

### be 120 mi n utes . The averaging time for each ru n will be documented. U ll y will t reat each samp l e tra i n resu l t I n the data set as an Individ u al data poi n t Data range: Du ri ng th e PCTPP . L illy w ij l collect at least 15 valid da ta sets consisting of s i multaneous PM CEMS and dua l RM meas urements. More 

### may 

### be collected 

### so t h a t certai n test resu l ts 

### may be r ejected. L il ly will auempt to collect data i n three ranges [ (Low) from zero to 50% of maxi mum measured PM concentration; (Mid) 25 - 75% of the maxim um meas u red PM concentration; and (h i g h ) 50 to 100% of the maximum measured PM concentration]. T h e goa l is to have at least 20% of the to ta l data i n each of the th ree ranges. A da ta set can only be used fo r one range . Lill y wi ll use zero po i nt data for the l ow va l ues if a response a t the low leve l cannot be achieved. Reference Method oa!a: D u mg the PCTPP , Lilly will eval u a te the precis ion of the two sample trains by determining the relatille standard deviation (RSD) for each pai red data set and co m paring It to th e recommended maxi m u m RSD. The RSD will be calcu l ated for each test run using the following eq u ation:

where: RSD = relatille standard devia tion (%) Ca =concen tration measured u s i ng Tra i n A , u n its of concentration Cb =co n centratio n measured us i n g Train 

### B, same units as Ca. Pursuant to Sectio n 

### Z . 1 .4 o f E PA' s Draft Guidance Docu ment on PM CEMS , the recommended maxi mum RSD w i ll be determined as follows: • For average PM conce ntrations that are at least 10 mg / dscrn (or a t l east 1 0 mg/acrn), t he recomme n ded maximum RSD 

### is 10% • For ave ra ge PM concentrations that are le ss than or equal to 1 . 0 mg/dscrn (or less than or eq u a l to 1.0 mg/acrn), the recommended maxi mum RSD 

### is 25%; a n d • For average PM concentrat i ons between 1 .0 a n d 10 mgldscrn (o r betwee n 1.0 and 10 mg/acm), 

### the recommended maximum RSD i s determined using the following equation :

11 Rev. 7.0 

# VES009359Eli L illy an d Company Lafayette, I ndia n a

where: Altemative Monitoring Petition 

## RSD,. = 

## (26.67 - 1.67C .,. ) RSD, 

## = recommended maximum RSD for average PM concentrat i on between 1 .0 and 10 mgldscm, 

### (%). 

# c.,. = average PM concentration fo r the Trai ns A and B, units of concentration EPA's d raft g uidance docu ment o n PM CEMS i s provided i n Appendix A. If the RSD ana l ys is shows that the data for a ll test ru n s are w ith in the recomme n ded maximum RSD , n o further assessment of data preclslo n 

### wltl be performed. If the RSD shows one or more ou Ui ers , U lly wi ll use th e standardized residua l method. Under the standard i zed residua l met hod, Li ll y will p lot data that compares T ra i n 1 sampl i ng results to Tra i n 

### 2 sampl in g resu lts. The l i near relationsh i p must have a s l ope falling between 0.93 and 1 .07. Data sets wi ll be removed until the r eference method data meets this criterion . Preliminary Correlation Deyelooment: Val i d reference method data (Train 1 and Train 

### 2 as ind ividual points) wi ll be plotted against the Sig ri st output (mA or PLA) averaged over the sample period . The average Sig ri st o u tput will 

### be on the X - axls and RM resu lt , in mglscm (to represent the condijions in sa mple tra in standardized to standard t emperat ure and pressure) on the Y-axls. Using the equati ons I n PS11, Ully 

### wltl calc ul ate up to five correlations ( 1 ) linear (2) po lynomial (3) logarithmic (4) expone nti al (5) power correlation mode l s . Each attempted corre l ation w ill have the corre la tion coefficient, tolerance Interval , and confidence Interval calculated 

### as described in PS11. Li lly will compare t he correla ti on coefficient, conf i dence interval , and tol erance interva l to the l im i ts in PS 11. A successful pre l iminary co rrelation will be obta i n ed, that u ses real·tlme GEMS values to predict P M concen t rations in mglscm , if all statistical checks i n PS11 are met. During the correlati o n deve l opment, drill 

### from the linearity checks will be reco rded daily. 

### If t he d rill, for any of the va l ues , exceeds 

### 6% , the PM CEMS will be adjusted and a new drill test performed. 

### 3.1.2.6 PM CEMS Calibration Correlation Tes1 ( PM CEMS Certi f i cation ) The obj ective of t he ca l ibration co rr elati on test period (CCTP) Is to collect d a t a, wh il e bum i ng hazardous waste , t o establish a correlat i on which will pred i ct tol al particulate mass e missions, i n mg/scm , based upon th e outp ut 

### of th e S i gri st PM GEMS. PS 11 will be used as guidance to establ i s h a valid ca l.i brat i on corre l a tion . 

### 1 2 Rev . 7 .0 

## V E$009360E li Li ll y an d Comp a ny Lafayette, I ndia na T h e follow i n g acti vijies will be cond u cted duri n g the CCTP: Alte rn ati ve Mon i tori n g Pet itio n

Seyen day Drift: Prior to beg i nn in g t he CCTP. 

### the PM CEMS w i ll have passed a seven day drift l est pursuant to Section 8.5 ( 3) of PS 11. Fo r seve n coosecullve days , the li n ea ri ty c h eck will 

### be comp l eted. The pe r cen t d r i ft at five leve l s will 

### be recored. Each va l ue m u st be within 5% o f the reference val u e. Ab s o l ute Correlation Audit The abso l ute cor relat i on audit (ACA) eva l uates the PM CEMS r esponse to a se ri es of reference s tandards cove ri ng a fu ll measu r ement ra n ge 

### of the in strument To conduct this aud ij th e PM CEMS will be cha l lenged thr ee t i mes at each 

### of the five aud it po i nts . lilly wi ll fo ll ow Section 1 0 . 3(2) of 40 CFR 60 Append ix F Proced u re 2 (Proced u re 2) as gu i dance for conduc t ing the ACA. The average response will 

### be u sed to calculate t h e accu r acy at each audit poin t The ACA wi U be ca l c u lated using the equation I n Procedure 2 listed below. T he e r ro r ca n not exceed 10% of th e audit value, or 7.5% o f the applicab l e s t andard; whicheve r is gr e ate r . l 

## R - R 

# I ACA Accuracy = C B.IfS RE F 

### *I00 

### R,EF where: ACA Accuracy = Th e ACA accuracy at each audit poin t , (%) Rcer. t s = t he me a s u red PM CEMS response to the reference stan d a r d 

### (rnA) 

### R.. e F = t h e P M reference sta n dard value (rnA) S tra!jfjcati o n 

### Test : Li lly wi ll test for P M s trat ifi catio n by following t h e same ge n e ra l steps s pecified 

### for gaseous pollutants, and following the guida n ce specified I n Section V . 5 of E PA' s D raft Gu i dance Docu m e nt on PM CEMS. To determine w hether effluen t stratification exists , a dual probe system will 

### be uSed to determi n e the average effl u e n t conce n trati on while measurements at each traverse po i nt are be i ng made. One probe , located a t th e stack ce n tro id , w i ll 

### be us ed as a statio n ary reference poi nt to I nd i cate change i n the effl u ent coocentration ove r lime. The second probe w i ll be used fo r sampling at the traverse points s pecifoed i n Method 1 ( 40 CFR part 60 appendix A). T h e monito ri ng s ystem samp les slmullaneous l y at 

### the refe r e n ce and traverse points th ro u ghout the testi ng period for app roxi matel y fifteen mi n utes at each po i nt A m i nim u m of 12 sampl i ng po i nts will be used, with 6 sampl i ng po i nts a l ong each of the two traverses. Lilly will use Method 5 as the samp l ing meth od and sample a t least 15 m i nutes a t each s a mpl i ng point.



### 13 Rev. 7 .0 

# VES009361E li Lill y and Com p any Lafaye tte, I ndia na A lternative M o n itori ng P etitio n T he PM conce nt rations at each traverse point are t hen compared to t he average o f t he PM concentrat i ons for a ll sampl i ng po i nts to determine th e perce nt s t ratification us i ng the following equation: 

## S =I C - C 

## 1 *100"1< i 

### Q •"' 0 where : 

### S 

# = percent stratifi cation C; 

### = PM concentration at sa m pling poin t C..., 

## = ave r age PM co ncentra tion for all sampling points. If the percent st ra tificati o n is l ess than or eq ua l to 10 perce nt for a n y traverse point , the d uct i s not cons i dered stratified at t hat location. Reterence Me!!Jod: Li ll y wi ll 

### use Method 5 or Method Si 

### as t he reference method. L i ll y w i ll use dual t rai n s (pe r pendicu l ar t rai n s) tor the ref erence method (RM) sampling. The targets ar e 60 -mln ut e runs . S h orte r or l onger runs may 

### be necessary. Fo r example, for h i gh parti cula te loading , the test runs may o n ly be 45 m i nutes due to excess ive pressure drop across the filter , and fo r very low particu l ate l oad ing, test runs may 

### be 120 m in utes. Th e averaging ti me for each run w i ll 

### be well documented. Li l ly wi ll adhere to P$ 1 1 and tre at each samp l e train resu l t in the data set as a n in dividual dat a po i nt Data range: Lilly will a d here to PS11 for th e data co ll ection. This req u ires at least 15 valid data sets co nsi st ing of sim u ltaneous PM GEMS and d ual RM m easurements. More may 

### be collected so th at certa i n test resulls may 

### be re ject ed 

### as l ong as at least 1 5 valid data sets are u sed to determine the co rrel a ti on. All data w i ll 

### be reported. Lilly will attempt to collect data i n t h ree ranges [ (Low) 

### from zero to 5 0% of max PM concentrati on ; (M i d) 25- 75% o f the max PM conce n trati on; a n d (h i gh) 

### 50 to 100% of the max PM co ncentrati o n ] . The goa l is to heve at l east 20% of 

### the total dat a i n each of 

### the three ra nges. A data set can o n ly 

### be used for one range . Lilly wi ll use zero poin t data for the low va l ues 

### if a response at the low l evel cannot be ach i eved. While co l lecting total pa rti cu l ate mass data during th e CCT P, 

### the Inte nti on is to collect total pa rt iculate dat a tha t i s c l ose to, but not si gnlfocantty greater th an the t ota l particu l ate mass emission standard. However , because the purpose of CCTP I s to develop an acceptable corre l ation that can v erify comp l iance at the emiss i o n standa r d,**~** is imposs i ble to e n sure that t he total pa rti c u l ate 

### mass emiss i o n standard will not 

### be exceede d du ring some of 

### the test runs . Accord i ngly, emissions standards from parts 

### 60 , 6 1, 

### 63, 264 , 265 , a nd 266 of T itl e 

### 40 of the Code of Federa l Re gulations do 

### not apply wh i l e 14 Rev. 7.0 

# VES009362E l i 

### Lilly and Company Lafayette, Indiana Alternative Monitori ng Pet ition conducting a corre l ation test i ng prog r am. Any permit o r ot h er em issions o r o peratin g parameter l im its or**cood~ions.** in clud i ng a n y**im ~a** **tioos** on work place practi ces , that a re ap pli cable to ensure comp li an ce wh h th e em issions standards o f parts 60, 61, 63, 264, 265, a nd 266 

### of Title 40 of th e Code o f Federal Reg u lations 

### also do not app l y whi l e cond u cting a corre l ation te s tin g program. Refe rence Method Da ta: 

### Ully w ill eva l uate th e precision of the two sam p le trai n s by det e rm i n ing the relative sta n dard deviation (RSD) for eacfh pa i red data set a nd compa ri ng i t to th e recomme n ded max i m u m RS D. U l ly will follow the guid a n ce provided in Section 

### Z.1 . 4 o f E PA's Draft G u i dance Docume nt o n PM GEMS . T he RSD 

### will be ca l cu l ated fo r 

### eacfh test r u n using the fo l lowi ng equati on:

where: 

# " c 

# c > I

## RSD**too t~-'**  

## ' - • (C, 

# + c.>

RSD : relative s t a n dard d evi at io n 

### ( %) Ga 

### = concen tration m easu red u sing Train 

### A. u nits of co n ce n tration Gb 

## = concentrat ion m easure d using Train 

### B . same u n its as Ga P u rsuant to Sectio n 2.1.4 of E PA's Draft G u idance Documen t on PM GEMS, the recomme n ded maxlmum RSD 

### will be determined as follows: • For ave ra ge PM concentratio n s t hat are a t l east 10 mg ld s cm (or at l east 10 mglacm) . t h e recommended maxim u m RSD i s 

### 100/o • For ave rag e PM concentrations that a re l ess than or eq u al to 1.0 mgldscm (or 

## tess t h an or eq ua l to 1 .0 mglacm), t h e r ecomme n ded maxim u m RSD is 25%; and • For average P M con centratio ns between 1 . 0 and 10 mgldscm ( o r between 1 . 0 and 1 0 mglacm), the recommended maxlmum RSD Is d e term i ned using lh e following equ ation: 

## RSD, = 

### (26.67 - 1.67C m

.) w h ere: RSD, 

## = recommended maxi m u m RSD for average PM co n ce ntration betwee n 1 .0 and 1 0 mg ld scm, (%). 

### C,.,. 

# = average PM conce ntrati on for th e Trai ns A a nd 

### B, units of conce ntra ti o n 

### 15 Rev . 7 . 0 

# VES009363E li Lilly and Comp a ny Lafaye tte, Ind ia na A lt ernativ e Mon itoring P et itio n 

### If the RSD ana l ysis shows that the data for a ll test runs are w i thi n the recomme n ded maximum R S D, no furt h er assessment of data precision will be performed. 

### If the RSD shows one or more outl i ers. Lilly will u se th e standardized res i dual method . Under t h e standard i zed resid u a l method, Lilly w ill plot data tha t compares Tra i n 1 samp l ing r esults to T ra i n 2 sampl i ng res u Hs . The linear relations h ip must have a s l ope falling between 0.93 and 1. 07 . Data sets w i ll be r emoved u nti l the re fe ren ce method data meets this criterion. Al l data wil l be saved and s u bm itted. Rega rd l ess ofwh i ch method i s used , any po t ential outliers will be investi gated to det ermine possi ble cau s es f o r the lack of precis i on. Cotrelation Development Va l id r eference method data (Tra i n 1 and Trai n 2 as Ind iv i dual po i n ts) wi ll be plotted again st the S i grist output 

### (rnA or PLA) ave raged ove r the sample pe riod. T h e ave rage Sigri s t output will be on the X -axls a n d R M resu l t , I n mg/scm (to represent the conditions In sample tra i n sta n dardized to s tandard temperature and pressure) on theY-a x is. Usin g t he equati ons i n PSI t, Li ll y wi ll ca l c u l at e up to fiVe correlat i ons ( 1) l i near (2) polynomia l (3) l ogarithmic ( 4 ) exponentia l (5) power corre l ation m odels. Each attempted corre l at i on wi ll have th e corre l ation coeffic i ent, t olerance i nterva l , and confid en ce i n terva l calculat ed a s described i n PS11. Lilly w ill com pa re the correlatio n coefficient confidence in te rval, and t o l erance i n te rva l to the l i mits in PS 1 1. A successfu l correlation will be established that uses re aHim e CEMS values to p r ed i ct particu l ate co n centration In mg/scm If a ll s tatistical checks I n PS 11 are met. If the P M CEMS does not pass the statistica l li mits for any o f the five correla ti o n s. Lilly, with ap p rop ri ate agency r eview, may deve l op an a tt

ernalive corre l ation by provid i ng a n explanallon o f how compliance demo n stratio n would be assured. The correlation established duri n g t he CCTP for t he PM CEMS wi ll supersede any previ ous correlations. whleh may have bee n established . During the CCTP. drift from t he linearity checks will be recorded da i ly. If th e 

### drift, fo r any of the values. e xceeds 8% once, t h e PM CEMS w i ll 

### be a d j us ted and a n ew drift test pe rformed.

3 .1. 2 . 7 R out in e Operation of th e PM CEMS 3 . 1. 2 . 7 . 1 O n -G oin g Qua li ty Ass urance T h i s s e ction d escribes the o n-go in g q u a l i ty assura n ce that will be perf ormed on the P M CEMS to en s u r e lhat it cont i nues t o operate co rrecUy and produces valid data. These quality assura n ce activi ties wi ll occo r on ly when the P M CE M S i s operatio n al. Li lly will follow P roced u re 2 a nd EPA' s Draft Gui d ance Document o n PM CEMS located in Appendix A of this documen t when performing on-go i ng q u al ity assu ra n c e on the P M C E MS.



### 16 Rev. 7 .0 

# V

E S009364E li Lilly and Company Lafayette , India na 3. 1. 2.7 .2 Routine System Checks Alte r native Mon i toring Petition

Dai ly checks of t he PM C E MS w i ll be done according the recomme n ded c h ecklist provided by Sigrist, as modified by Lilly. Data stat u s H ags 

# wm be used to troubleS h oot a n y problems that arise i n th e PM CEMS system . This meets th e Intent o f the daily system checks in PS11. 3 .1 . 2 .7.3 Weekly L in earity Drift Check s Lilly will perform a linearity check once pe r week. This will be performed manually according to the procedure outl i ned i n the Sig ri st operati ona l ma n u al. The percen t drift i s calculated as: l 

## R - R 

# I % Drift 

### = CW S REF 

### *J OO 

## Span where: % Drift 

## = Dri ft 

### of the CEMS (%) RcEhos 

### = the meas u red PM C EMS response (rnA) RR E F 

### =the PM reference standard va l ue (rnA) Spa n = Span o f the i nst rument ( 20 rnA) Five values between 0 · 20 

### mA will be checke d . The actual value{s) will be adj u s ted whe n t h e drift exceeds 5% for any o f the five values. (Refe r to Section 3.1.2.9 for out of con t ro l defi n ition). The Sig ri st wil l 

### be off -l in e for u p to one ho u r d uring the l inearity check . Al l ca li brati on data collected along**w~h** the drift pe r centage will 

### be reco rd ed. During this time , the 6-hour ro ll ing blOCk a verage**~J** be frozen. 3 . 1.2 . 7.4 Sys t em Aud it s 3 . 1 .2 . 7 .4 . 1 Quarterly Absolute Corre latio n Audit (ACA) The absol ut e correlatio n a u d it (ACA) evaluat es the PM CEMS response to a series of re ference standards covering a fu ll measurement r ange 

### of the Instrument. To co n duct th i s au dit , Lilly wi ll perf o rm the li nearity d rift check. The PM CEMS wi ll be challenge d three t im es at each of the fiv e a u di t po i nts . The



### 17 Rev. 7.0 

# VES009365Eli Lilly and Company Lafayette, I ndiana A l ternative Mon i toring Peti tio n average respo nse will be used t o ca l culate th e accuracy a t each aud it poinl The ACA will be calculated us i ng the**Equa~on** 2 · 1 i n Procedu re 2 as fo ll ows: 

# I R . - R 

# I ACA Accuracy = C<Ms R tF 

### *I 00 

## R,u where: ACA Accu racy= Accuracy of the GEMS(%) Rce ...s =th e meas u red PM G EM S res po nse (rn A) R..EF =th e PM refere nce standard va l ue (rnA) T he error ca n not e xceed 1 0% o f the**d~** va lue , or 7.5% of the applicable standard; whichever 

### is greater. T he ACA wiR be performed each quarter. 3. 1 . . 2 .7 .4 . 2 Quarte rly Re lative Response Audit ( RRA ) The re l ative respon s e**aud ~**  (RRA) is a b ri e f series of t ests conduct ed between a nnua l full response c o rrelation audits (R CA ) to assure the con t inued va li d it y o f th e PM GEMS correlation. The RRA will be pelfo rrned by co l lecting, at curren t s ource cond i tio ns . thr ee re fe rence method samples a nd PM GEMS m easure m ents at 

### the as -f ound source operating cond iti ons. The d a ta points will 

### be p l otted on the current ca li bration correlatio n fun cti o n. To meet the RRA performance crite ri a. the three poi nts must be l ess 

### than or e q u a l t o t h e highest GEMS va l ues used for th e ca libra tion c u rve and 

### two o r 

### the threa sets of P M GEMS and RM measu re ments must f all within a specified a rea o n the graph of the cal i bration corre l ation function . The s pecifi ed area i s two l i nes parallel w i th the correlation regressio n curve, offset at a distance of 

### t 25% o f th e num erica l emiss i on l im it va l u e from the co rrelatio n re gression c u rve . I f th e P M GEMS does not m eet the RRA crite ri a, Ully will take the n ecessary correcti ve actio n to e li min ate t he prob l em and rapeat the te st. If the RRA c rite ri a ca nnot be achieved. U lly will perform an RCA. 3. 1 .2 . 7 . 4.3 Annua l Respo nse COI"AA I alion Audit ( RCA ) Lilly w ill perform a re sponse correl ation audit (RCA) annually. The qua rt e rl y RRA wi ll n o t be pe rformed in th e same q u arter tha t 

### the annua l RCA is preformed . The response co rrelation aud it ( RCA) 

### is a series o f tests co n ducted to ass ure th e co n ti n ued**valid~** of th e PM CE M S corre l atio n . Li l ly will co nd uct t he RCA as presc ribed in P S 11 and Proce d ure 2 . U li y will coll ect a min i m u m of 1 2 data points attem pting 

### to d i sperse t h e po i nts th ro u gh low , m i d . and high ranges on the ca li b ra tion corre l at i o n functio n . The po i nts 

### 18 R ev. 7.0 

# V

ES009366Eli Lilly and Company Lafayette , In diana Alternative Monitoring P etition will be p l olled oo t h e current calibrati on correlation functio n . To meet the RCA c ri te ri a , 75% of the po i nts must fall w ithi n a specifi ed area o n the corre l ation reg r essio n curve. The specified area i s 

### two li nes para ll el with the calibration corre l a tion fu nction. offsat at a distan ce of 

### :t 25% of the numerical emiss ion limit va l ue from the corre l ation r egression c u rve. As defined i n Secllon 1 0.6 of Procedu re 2. H Lilly 

### does not m eet the performance criteria. then the 

### two data sets (curre nt correlati on and the c u rrent RCA) wi ll be comb i n ed and the corre l ation s tatisti cs in PS 1 1 app li ed. I f a correlatio n from the combined data sets passes the stati stica l**ti miL~.**  th i s corre lalloo becomes the new corre l ation curve . 

### If t he stati stical l i m its are not met w ith t h e combined data , L ill y wi ll use on l y the RCA data and run the PS11 stati stics . I f the statistica l li m i ts are met , this Is the new correlation curve. If t he statistica l lim its are not met for t he RCA d ata, the correlat i on te s t wi ll be redone with a mi ni mum o f 15 data poi n ts , app l y i ng the s t atistics in PS11. If the 

### new data do not meet th e statistical criteria for any o f t he five P S 1 1 equalloos. and assuming no definab l e p r oblems exi st wi th th e PM CEMS, li lly , with appropriate 

### agency rev i ew, may develop an a l ternative corre l ation by provid ing an exp lanati on of how compliance demonstration would be assured. While collecting tota l particulate mass da ta du ri ng the RCA , the i ntentio n i s to col l ect tota l particulate data that 

### is close to, but not significantly greeter then the total p art iculate mass em i ssio n standard . Howeve r , because the purpose of RCA is to ve ri fy that t he correlation 

### is suitable for complying with the emission standa r d , It I s Impossib l e to ensure that the total particulate mass emission standard will not be exceeded du r ing 

## some o f t he test runs. Accordingly , emissions sta n dards fr om parts 

### 60, 61 , 63, 

### 264 , 265 , and 266 of Trtl e 40 of the Code of Fed eral Regulat ions do not apply w h il e conducting a corre l alloo testing program. 

### Any perm it 

### or other em i ssions o r operat in g paramete r l imits 

### or co n d i ti ons , includ i ng 

### any limita t i o n s on work p l ace practices , that are applicable to ens u re compl i ance with the emissions sta n dards of parts 

### 60, 61, 63, 264 , 265, and 266 of Title 

### 40 of the Code of Federal Regu l ations al so do not app l y while cond ucting 

### a correlati on testin g program . 3.1 .2. 8 Componen t Replacement D u ri ng normal operation of th e PM GEMS , specif i c compone nts will need to b e rep l aced. The PM CEMS standard operating proced u res will add r ess the criteria t o be met u pon replacemen t of Si gnificant compo nen ts . 3 . 1 . 2.9 Out 

### of Control Lilly will adj u s t the PM CEMS whe n th e d ri ft is eq u a l to or greater than 

### 5%. lilly w i ll conside r the PM CEMS o u t of control if drift , for 

### any of the fove va l ues , exceeds 

### 8%. In add iti o n , t he GEMS will 

### be dee m ed o ut of co n trol if the PM CEMS f ails to meet the RCA criteria, RRA cri teria, o r ACA criteria.

19 Rev . 7 . 0 

# VES009367

### Eli L il ly and Company Lafa yette, In d i ana Al t ern ati ve M o n itori n g P e tit i on T he oo t of control period will beg i n i m med iate l y afte r the last test run or ch eck ol an un s u ccessful RCA, RRA. ACA o r li nearity drift check. The oot of con trol period ends i mmed iately afte r the l ast te st run or check of the s u bsequent successfu l a ud ij or drift chec k , when the metals G E MS I s used as a back-up, or whe n t he inci n erator en ters pa rametric mode . 

### When the i ncinerato r i s operat i ng in 

### parametric mod e, the PM GEMS will not be dee med ou t of co n tr ol . 

### 3 . 1. 3 Use of th e PM C EM S f or C o m plia nce w ith t he HWC MACT 

### PM Standard Lilly may begi n u s i ng th e PM CEMS to demonstrate continu oos comp l iance with the HWC MACT PM em iss io n standard only a fter the fo llowing 

### is ach i eved: • A successfu l PM CEMS ca li brat ion Correlation Test as s p ecified i n Secti o n 3 . 1.2 . 6 fo l lowing E PA's approva l of th i s Alternative Mon i to ri ng Petitio n. • A modification to th e Ti t le V perm it is approved t hat incorporates the req ui rements of the a pprove d A tt

emalive Mo nitori n g Petiti on . Followi ng comp letio n of the above , on-going q u ality assurance wi ll be performed on the PM CEMS as specifi ed I n Section 3.1.2.7 of thi s document. 

### 3 . 1 . 4 Mon i t o r i ng Freq u en c y a n d Avera gi n g T ime The 

### PM CEMS wi ll provide a s ix -h oor rolling b l o ck average in mg/dscm corrected to 7% ox ygen. Th e sixhoor block average was sel ected as representative of the time pe riod to collect three manual particulate meas u rement sample s . One-m i nu te values 

## wm be used to d e velop 15-min u t e average va l ues , wh ich wi ll be u sed to deve l op o ne-hour block ave rage va l ues and six- hou r rolling b l ock average va l ues. Using the equ ation 

### from the ca li bra tion correlation, the 

### PM C E MS outp u t v a l ues wi ll be converte d t o mg/scm each m i nu te. 

### The E co ch em GEMS wi ll se nd the D AS on e-mi nute average oxygen a nd mo i stu re va l ues to use to 

### correct the PM CEMS va l u es to mg/ d scm at 7% oxygen . T he particu late stack concentration wi ll be corre cted to 7% oxygen by t h e fo l lowi ng equatio n :

w here: PM"' " = PM concentr at ion corrected to 7% oxyge n (mg/dscm) PM"""'"= PM stack gas con ce ntration (mg/dscm) 

### 0, 

### = Oxygen stack gas percent (vol %dry) 

### 20 Rev. 7.0 

# VES009368E li Lilly and Com p any 

### L a f aye tte , I ndia n a Alt e rn ati ve Monitoring P e t iti on T he 1 5-minute data Is lh e average o f th e one-m i n ute data w ith i n that block of t i me. Only one val i d o n eminu te value is requ i red to achieve a va l id 15-minute average va l ue. T h e hourl y b l ock average w i H 

### be ca l culated from l h e four 15 mi n ute averaged va l ues d uring t he hour as shown In th e foftowl ng equallon : 

## HBA 

# = .1:]__ 

### 4 where : HBA 

### = Hourly block average va lu e (mg/dscm corrected 

### to 7 % 0 2) Gl =a fifteen m i nu te observatioo from the GEMS analyzer (mg/dscm corrected to 7% 

### 0 2. ) I n t he even t that four valid 15-m i n ute a verag ed val ues a re nol availab le to cal c ulate a n hO u rly b l ock a ve r age (i.e. the GEMS produced problema tic data), va l id resuHs must 

### be ava i lable for a t l east three 15- m i nute cycles of opera tion to calcula te a one-hour block a ve ra ge . Th e s ix- hO ur rol l i ng average will 

### be ca l cu l ated 

### based on the average of the si x 

### most rece nt hourly block averages as shown i n t h e fo ll owing eq ua ti on:

where: 

# • 

# I HBA 

## SHRA = i =J 

## 6 SHRA =Six h o ur ro ll ing average va lu e ( m g/dscm corrected to 7% 

### 0.) H B A = Ho u r ly block average va l ue (mgldscm corrected to 7% 

### 0.) The six- ho ur rolling block average wi ll be updated every hour w hen a new , v a fid, hourly b l ock a verag e 

### is calcu l ated. 3 .1. 5 Rolling B loc k Average Ca lcu l ati o ns d u ri n g R o u ti ne C he cks an d Sys t em A u dits Lill y will put the PM CEMS i n a no n-m easu re mode on ce per week for up to one h our in order to perform the weekly l inea ri ty chec ks whil e bum i ng hazardo us waste. Du ri ng t h is ti m e, block average calculatio n s will 

### be frozen. Ro ll i ng bl ock ho u r average calculations wi ll resum e o nce th e lineari ty check i s s u cce ssfu l ly



### 21 Rev . 

### 7 .0 

## V E $ 0 09369

### Eli 

### L illy and Company Lafayette , India na A l ternative Monitoring Petition perfonned. The s ix-h our r ol l i ng block average ca l c u lations will res u me by adding the l irst valid hou r block ave rage afte r the l i nea rity check to the 

### previ ous five h our block average va lu es. The ro ll ing average ca l cu l ations wi ll al so 

### ba froze n du rin g the quarte r l y absolute correlat i on aud it s . Block hour average ca l cu lati on s will resume once th e a ud it Is complete . The ACA aud iti ng may ta ke more th an one hour to complete. The PM C E MS 

### OAS uses th e oxygen co n ce n trat i on and mo ist u re con ten t from 

### the Ecochem CEMS to correct the one mi n u te average mg/scm concentratio ns of PM to 

### 7% oxygen. dry bas i s. On ce per day, th e E cochem will b e in ca l i brat i on mode for up to one hou r . During th i s time the PM block average wi ll also 

### ba frozen. Incinerator operations will attempt to maint a i n stab le operati ng parame ters d uri ng t i mes of calibratio n . 

### 3 . 1 . 6 Backup to the 

### Particulate Matter CEMS In the eve n t th e 

### PM CEMS i s not o perat i ng. Lilly will have the option to u se the multi -metals CEMS as a bac k u p to the PM CEMS unde r th e following con d iti o ns: 

### 1. Res ul ts obtai ned from para ll el operati on of th e IWo CEMS will 

### ba used t o deve l op a tec hn ical j u stifi catio n of how lhe metals CEMS provides reasonable assurance of compliance**w~ h**  

### t h e PM emiss i on sta ndard. 2 . Whe n the PM CEMS Is not operating a nd the**mu t~** **metals** 

### CEMS beg i ns use as a back up, Li ll y wi ll use Its best effo rts to avoid i ntroducing new waste streams (i . e . those that have not been h istorically b urned w hi le the IWo CEMS were In paral le l operatio n) from the six " in-feed' conveyors to the fi na l 'me rge " co n veyor that leads t o th e kil n feed c h u te. In order to allow CEMS mode to establ is h waste streams that are n o t " n ew " duri ng its Initi a l imp l ementation period, the above rest rictions o n u se of t h e**mu lt** **~ta s**  

### CEMS servi ng 

### as a backup for t he PM CEMS will apply only after a sufficient ti m e period has e l apsed (not t o e x ceed 

### 6 month s f rom the first CEMS mode operat io n) fo r Lilly to g a i n expe ri ence wh i le processing a variety of exi sting solid waste streams. Fina ll y, Li lly wi l attempt to m ai ntain nominally stable or h istori cally l owe r feed rates of waste w h ile the backup i s being used, and will l i mit t h e use of t h e**ul ~metals**  

### CEMS as a back u p for the 

### PM C E MS to 

### 14 consecutive days per episode . Li ll y will use Its best efforts to minim iz e th e time t hat the mu lti -meta l s CEMS acts as a back u p t o the PM C E MS. To**facil ~t** **e** 

### its effo rts , Lilly will keep spare parts 

### In stock an d wi ll mainta in a service re la ti onship with the PM CEMS manuf a ct u re r , or o ther q u a l ified co n su lt a nts , t o m inim ize down ti me . If both the PM CEMS and tha m u lti -metals C E MS are not in use , Lilly w ill mo ni tor operati ng paramete r limits defined I n 22 Rev. 7.0 

# VES009370Eli Ully and Company Lafayette, I ndiana 

### Alte rnative Mon i tori ng Pet ition Section 1209 of the HWC MACT (i . e . parametric operatio n ). Deta i l s of 

### the specific operating**lim~s** are provided In the Notification of Compliance (NOC). Li lly 

### w ill in corpo rat e delays when trans itioni ng 

### from t he CEMS mode of operati on to the paramet ri c mode of operation. Specifically , o n ce the primary PM CEMS and the backup**uR~ meta** **s** CEMS are unavailable, the oontro l system will automa tically**sw~ch** to the parametric mode of operatio n. Rolling averages, related to the Air Pollution Control System (APCS). will not start until 

### the system h as been under the parametric mode of opera tion for 10 mi n utes. T h i s 

### 1 O

· m i nute time period wi ll al low Lilly tim e to ma ke any adjustments to the APCS to bring the system to**w~i n**  the respective operat i ng paramete r li mits. I n additio n, up to four hours will be allowed before re - starting conslituent feed rate rol li ng average operat i ng parameter**im~** in order to clear t he s ol id f eed conveyor system . (Note that, in a s i mi l ar fashion to th e "backup" scenario d escribed above, U ll y will 

### use I ts best efforts to avo i d introducing " n ew' waste st reams fro m the six "in-feed" conveyo rs to th e fi na l · merge' co n veyor t hat l eads t o t he kiln feed c hu te d u r i ng t hi s fou r hou r period. However, du r i ng I n i tial CEMS mode operati o n periods there will be practica l lim itatio ns t o th i s criterion because few waste st reams will have been burned.) Feed rates will be m aintained nom in ally stable or h i stori ca l l y lower than when operating in CEMS mode. I f the CEMS mode o f opera ti on is stat not ava i able after four hours. the tra n sition to parametri c 

### mode will be comp l eted and o n l y waste with known**compos ~ion**  will 

### be proce ssed i n the incinerato r 

### so t h at consmuent feed ra te operating parameter l imits can be computed. 3 . 1 . 7 Deviatio ns from Performance Specification 

### 11 • The Sigrist PM CEMS samples superisokinetic and may not continuously meat the requirement of

plus or minus 10% isokin et ic. The Sigrist system is desig ned to sample s uperi sokinet i c. This i s normally about 1.2 to 

### 1 .5 ti mes i sokineti c. Because of the Sig r ist design, 

### L illy cannot be s u re that the system will a lways be with i n ±10% 

### of lsokl netics . Lilly will adhere to PS11 and provi de data indicating that isokinetic samplin g is not necessary. This data will co nsist of part i cu l ate s ize d i st rib utio n data showing th e PM is predominate ly smal l partides ; thus acting as a gas. The particulate size distributi on da ta w i ll be collected du ring t he Comprehensive Performance Tes t. • Th e calibration correlation function will plot Sigrist values (mA or PLA} o n the X-axis and the referanc6 method average In units of mglscm on 

### the Y -axls. PS 1 1 Indicates that the refere n ce method values for PM should b e in 

### the same u ni ts as the CEMS (the Sigri st u nits are mgfSig ri st m 3 ). Based u po n t he experience with t he Sig ri st a t Li ll y (PM CEMS demonstrations 1 and 2), Lilly saw no affect upon t he corre l ation by correcting the Meth od 

### 5 units to u nits of the Sigrist 

### The ope rating pressure Inside 

### the photomete r i s not well defi ned, making correction to this pressu re an un known. Based upo n experi en ce , Lilly wi ll standa rdize th e 

### RM data to mg/scm

23 Rev. 7.0 

# VES009371Eli Lilly and Company Lafayette, Ind iana Alternative Mo nitori ng Petition 

### (6 8 •F and 

### 29.92 i n clles). T h is i s a l so co n siste n t with the 

### way lill y's Kin sa l e , I re l and faci li ty has establ i shed va li d correlations to the two S igrist units ope rated a t that faci l ity. • Ully will use up to 20% 

### of the correlation data (low range only) for zero points 

### iflow PM data cannot 

### be produced. 

### It is importan t to prov i de P M em i ssion data for the correlatiOn tha t i s spread across th e d es ired range of meas u rement Often, data at the low end o f th e ra n ge 

### is difficu lt 

### to obta in . G iven this**lac ~**  using zero points for the l ow data 

### may be requ ired. • Lilly 

### wi ll conduct a seven-day drift prior to the calibration correlation. This will be the l inearity c heck procedure d escribed In the S i grist operation manua l (cllecks 5 values b etwee n 0-20 

### rnA) , which i s a ma nu a l exe r cise e acll 

### day for 

## seven days . The criteri a will defa u lt to the a ll owab l e drift recomm ende d by S i g r ist o f 5% as opposed to 2% of the span i ndicated i n PS 11. Use of the Sigrist for comp l iance to a PM s tan dard i s n ew I n the US. In ou r e xpe ri ence, t he criteria s p ec ified abo v e a r e s uffi cient to und ersta n d the drift of the un it and i s acceptable based on o u r PM CE M S demonstrations. Sigrist (the CEMS m a n uf acture r) suppo rts us i ng the a bove c riter i a. • P$11 stipulates immedi ate compliance with QAIQC requirements (Procedure 2) upon successfully completing the correlation test outl ined in P$11. Li lly wi ll comp l y w ith Pro posed P r ocedure 

### 2 afte r 

### fi nal corre lation and stat isti cs have bee n established a nd the Sigrist PM CEMS is d eeme d re ady for use as a com p liance tool. Un ti l the n, Lilly wi ll use anot her mea n s (surrogate o perati ng parameters or the mu l ti-m etal s CE MS) to assure compliance w ith th e P M standa rd if wa s te is being b u rned I n the so ll d4iquld I ncinerator. • Appendix F, Procedure 

### 2 does not discuss time to calibrate for the 

### Sigrist. Li ll y will p ut t he Sigrist i n a non-meas ure mode once per week for up to 

## one hou r whil e con tin uing t o bum h aza rd ous w aste i n 

### order to periorrn 

### the cal i bra t ion cll ecks . • Unearity drift will 

### be check ed onc e per 

### week , 

## not once per day. li ll y wi ll lot low PS 11 on adj usti ng the ze r o or upsca l e va l u e w hen the drift , per the P roced ure 

### 2 equation , is greater t h an 

### 5%. Sig ri s t re commends c hecki n g 

### the zero and or upscal e drift not mo r e than once per week. S ince th e photo meter comp e n s at e s for electronic drift du r i ng each sample , c hec ki ng th e zero and upsca l e d ri ft da i y is o f no value. NOTE: 

### The weekl y calibrati on drift check will chec k five values with in the 

### 0 - 1 00% r ange of t he PM CE M S. This exceeds th e zero a nd upscale drift range r eq u i r e m ents. • P$11 deems t he CEMS out of control 

### if the daily, zero or upsca le drift exceeds 4% for five consecutive 

### days, or 8% once. Ul ly will adhere to the 

### 8% req uire m ent a s described I n section 

### 3 .1. 2 .9. 

### 24 Rev . 7.0 

# VE S009 372

### Ell Ully and Compa n y Lafa yette , I n diana A l ternative M onh oring Peti tion



### • While pefforming the quarterly ACA 

### the PM CE.MS may be 

### off-line for greater than one hourper day . The time**ofl lne**  

### will not require use o f either the mu lti -meta l s CEMS or surrogate paramete rs to demonstrate complia nce with the HWC MACT. The quarterly aud its w ill not require th e use of paramet ri c mo(!e.

3 . 2 

### M UL n-METALS CEMS 3.2 . 1 Indicator of Perlonnance Lilly has vo l u n tari l y ch ose n to u se a multi-metals CEMS to (!emonstrate con tinuo us complia n ce with the HWC MACT meta l s emission l i m its . Usi ng a C E MS to mon itor stack gas conce n trat i on s o f metals i s a r e latively new applicat i on and as such, the HWC MACT does 

### not requ i re facilities to Install and operate a multi-metals CEMS for HWC MACT compliance purposes . The mu lti-meta l s CEMS 

### is desig ned to con tinuo u sly monitor the stack gas co nce ntra tion of mercury, arsenic, chrom i um , cadmium, and l ead to (!emonstrate comp l iance with the 

### HWC MACT meta l s em i ss i on l i mits . Comp l iance with HWC MACT meta l s em i ss i on standa r ds will 

### be d em onstrated whe n t he measured stack meta l s co n centrations a re l ess than or equal to th e app li cable standards. Cu rre ntly, Li ll y must comply w ith the HWC MACT inte rim standards u nder 40 CFR 63 . 1203(b) . Compl i a nce 

### with the in terim HWC MACT mercury standard will 

### be d emonstrated when th e measured slack concentrations of mercury i s l ess t han or equa l t o 45 ug/ dscm corrected to 7 % oxygen ove r a 12-hou r rolling averagi ng period, updated h ourl y . Co mp liance wi th the 

### l ow vola Hi e metals HWC MACT lnlerlm emission standard will 

### be demonstrated when the measured stack concen t rati ons o f a r se ni c and chrom i um and defau H levels of be ryllium (see secti o n 3.2 . 2.1 ) are less than or equa l to 97 ug/dscm comb i ned, corrected to 7% oxygen over a 1 2 -ho ur rolling averag i ng pe ri od, updated hourly. Compliance with the semi-volat il e m etals in te rim HWC MACT emission sta nd a r d will be demonstrated whe n th e meas u red stack concentratio n s of l ead a nd cadmium are less than or equal to 120 u g/dscm comb in ed , corrected t o 7% oxygen over a 12· h our rolling averaging period, u pdated houl1y. Li ll y will comp l y with the HWC MACT fina l replacemen t meta ls em i ss i on standards spec if l8d in Section 63.12 1 9(a) no l ater th an the d ate required by Section 1206(a )(1)( 11) of th e HWC MACT F inal Rep la cem e n t Standa r ds.



### 25 Rev. 7.0 

# VES009373Ell Lill y an d C om p a n y Lafa y e tte , I n d i ana 

### 3 . 2 . 2 M eas u remen t Tec hni que 

### 3.2.2 . 1 Ope rating P rin cipl es A lternati ve M onitoring Petitio n

The multi-meta l s CEMS is an X- ray based co n ti nuous emission monitor (XACT) manufaclured by Cooper E n v i ronmental Servi ces LLC (or eq uivalent) . The XACT extracts a representat ive stack gas samp l e a n d concentrates the particu l ate and gas phase metals on a c h emica8y-reactive filter . Th e concentratiO n s of meta l s i n 

### the filte r**depos ~s**  are meas u red wit h an energy-d i spe rsive X-ray fl uorescence (XRF) ana l yze r . Figu res 

### 3 and 

### 4 sChematically illustrate the major compone nts of the XACT , 

### which include: 

### 1. A sample extraction system 

### 2 . A sample collectio n module 

### 3. A meta l s ana lysis module 

### 4 . A fl ow co n tro l mod ul e 

### 5. A system control module 

### 6. A PC in terface 

### 7 . A Data Acqu i s i tion System and Histori an The XACT 

### is designed to measu r e 

### the concentratio n o f up to 

### 20 e l emen t s. including antimony (Sb). arsen i c 

### (As). ba rium 

### (Ba) . cadm i um (Cd ), chrom i um (Cr). coba lt (Co), l ead ( Pb), m anganese (Mn). me rcury 

### (Hg). nicK el (N I), selenium (Se) sil ver (Ag). and thallium (TI). Because 

### the XACT i s i ncapable of measuring beryllium (Be) , Lilly ha s developed a defau lt va lu e for beryllium e missions . Fortunately. beryllium 

### Is a scarce element that is not used i n L ill y pharmaceutica l m a nufact u ring proce sse s . Lilly has examined a ll**~** manufacturi n g processes an d associated process construction materi al s ( e .g. alloy sleets) an d found no I nd ication that beryllium s h oul d be prese nt. T h erefore , Lilly believes that a conservatively ca l cu l ated default va l ue f or beryllium is technica l ly defens i ble. Trace level s of berylli u m are possibl e i n raw materia l s a n d gro un d water. L illy has sampled i ts l iquid waste and found on l y sporad i c " hi ts " of berylli u m at levels c l ose to th e detection limits. Li ll y has also done some limited sampl i ng of pl ant trash. some of w hi ch migh t be p rocessed i n 

### the**so id~** **qu d**  i nci ne rator , and some low-l evels of beryl l ium were reported. For 

### the purposes 

### of calcu l at i ng a conservative default emission co n cen t ration , Lilly has assumed that all li quid and sol i d wastes fed to the so l id-l i qui d i nci ne rato r 

### 26 Rev. 7 .0 

# VES009374Ell Ully and Com p any Lafayette, I nd i a na Alt erna tive M onitoring Petition

con tai n 

### Be a t ttle maxi m u m l eve l s detec ted: 1.0 ppm in the solid waste and 0.0 1 ppm In t h e liqu id wastes. T h e defaun e mission concentrati on was then ca l cu l ated u sing the maxi mum waste feed rates 

### from t h e CPT plan , and a n LVM system remova l efficie ncy (SR E) of 98% (which I s a factor of 

### two l ess than the des i gn SRE of 99% and a factor of 20 less t ha n the SRE of 99.9% obta i ned during the CPT of another L illy i ncinerator with a v i rtually ide ntica l scru bber system) . The resulting va l ue was just over 1 ug/dscm . To be more conserva tive , Lilly has chosen 

### 2 ug/dscm as a defa uH value . Th erefo re , a va l ue of 

### 2 ug/dscm w il be added to the measured LVM emission before comparison to the em i ssion standard lim it. If the CPT data or any other evidence In dicates the default va l ue Is not appropriate , i t wnt 

### be adjusted accord i ngly. Copies of th e XACT Mu lti-Meta l s CEMS Guida nce Docume nts , Perlormance Specificati ons , and Qua l ity Assurance Documents a r e provided i n Appe n d i x 

# e. 3 . 2.2.1 .1 Sample Extraction System T h e extraction system for the XACT is Ide nti ca l to t he extractio n system used by t he Sig ri st 

### PM CEMS. T he sample system co n sis ts o f a samp l e probe and r i ng pipe. 

### The sample probe s i ze was selected by the manufact urer 

### to provide an Inlet gas velocity t hat is app.-oxima tely 1.0 to 1 .5 times great er than 

### the normal stack gas velocity when sampling at the preset (design) rate of approxi mately 1 acm/m i n . Th i s super-iso kl netic operati n g condition i s u sed to mi n imize part i culate measureme nt erro r that can 

### be sig n ifi cant at s u b- i soki netic cond itions . The**supe ~sok** **netic** cond i tion i s an a lternat ive 

### to cont i nuous mo nitori ng of the stack gas veloci t y and adjustment of the samp l ing rate I n order to mai ntain isokinetic**cond~ ons.**  Stack gases are withdrawn through a fi xe d sample probe, transfer re d through 

### a ring p i pe where the gas is condtlloned by h eating to approx i mately 160 

# •c (320 °F) to vaporize any water and acid drop l e ts tha t may be present in 

### the gas stream . A slipstream of the sample gas Is extracted l sokineti ca ll y fr om t he ma i n r i ng pipe fl ow I nto a la rge diameter sm l ing chamber and through the 

### fl ow c ontrol mod ul e. 3 . 2 . 2. 1 . 2 Sa mp le Collection M odule About one lite r per m i nu te ( lp m) of the s tack gas is i soki netically drawn from the s ti ll i ng chambe r throu g h a sampl i ng tube, m i x ed 

### with a red u c i ng agent , and filtered through a filter tape for ana lys i s . After sampli n g for approximately 15 m inutes , the deposit spot i s advanced about 

### two inches wh ere th e meta ls**concen ra~ons**  per sample depos i t a r e measured by XRF whi l e the n ext samp l e i s being col l ected.



### 27 Rev. 7.0 

# VES009375

### Eli U ll y and C om p a n y La fayette, Ind i ana 

### 3 .2. 2 .1. 3 M eta l s An alysis M odule AH e matlve M on itori n g Pe lition

The meta ls anal ysis mod u le of the XACT consists 

### of a n energy d ispers ive mu l ti-ele me nt XRF a na l yz e r. Th is m uki-elemen t se n so r cons i sts of a n X-ray tube and a lithium-drifted si lico n e ne rgy d isp ersive X -ray detec t or , or eq uiVa le nt. The energy of the cha racteristic X -rays provid&s t he qual itat ive i nf ormati on t o identify the e l eme nt s pre sen t in the 

### sample w hil e t he I nte n s i ty of each ana l yte line (X -ray) provides the qua nti tati ve I nformation t o determi n e 

### the mass of each e l emen t prese nt i n the**depos~.** 

### The mass or each metal per samp l e deposit spot i s re port ed to th e data acq uis i t io n system for s u bsequen t stack gas concen tration calculat i ons. 

### 3 . 2 . 2.1 . 4 Fl ow Contro l Module T he filt ered gas 

### from th e sample modu l e i s drawn throug h the 

### gas cond iti o n ing componen t or th e flow control module. Th ese componen ts rem ove mo i sture a nd corrosive ga S&s from 

### t he stack gas a llowing f or vol u me measureme nts in 

### dry standard cub i c me ters ( dscm) . The gas I s the n drawn through a two - way soleno id valve , pressure transducer , and mass 

### flow con t ro ll er. Typi cally , the flow t ravels direcUy t o a ma n ual l ea k check va lv e and vacu um p u mp but a ft ow QA 

### loop i s avai l ab l e f o r cross - ch e cki ng flo ws aga i nst a second mass flo w meter . After flowing through the vac u um pump , the samp l e gas is returned to th e s tack . 

### 3.2. 2 . 1 .5 System Control Modu le T he system contro l mod ul e cons ists of programmab le l ogic con trol de vi ces, firmwar e , powe r supplies, r el ays , fus es, etc. to co ntrol the tem p erat ur

es, flows and mechanica l aspects or t h e system. The stat u s of these componen ts Is monitored by softwar e and fi rmware associated with the 

### PC modu l e. 

### 3 .2.2.1. 6 P C I nte rface M odu le The PC 

### module co n tains the overa ll system co ntr ol, XRF a n alys is. and ca l cu lat ion software. This software mon it ors 

### the system operat i ng paramete rs and prese n ts a variety or status and flag s whe n 

## a compone n t Is operating ou t s i de or defined control ranges. It 

### also performs q uan titative XR F m etal s concen tration calc ul at ion s and combi nes the meta l s conce n trations per sa m p le deposit 

### wi t h the volume samp l e d per samp le depos it data to calcu l ate dry stack gas concentrati ons i n microgra m s 

### per d scrn . 

### 3.2. 2 . 1. 7 Data Acqu is i tion System and Hi storian Meta l s co n centrati ons, In micrograms pe r dscm, data s tatu s , qu a l ity assura n ce data . . status flags , a nd s yste m operatio nal stat u s/alarms are passed to a data aoq u is iti on syste m (DAS). The D AS pe rfonns th e data ca l cula ti ons fo r comp l iance. A ll data are saved in 

### a hi storia n. 

### 28 Rev. 7.0 

# VES0093 7 6

### Eli Lill y an d Company Lafayette , I ndiana 3.2 . 2.2 I nstallation L ocation Alt ernati ve Monitoring Petition

The XACT sample int erface in l e t wi ll be Installed a t an accessib l e location downstream of the ai r po llutio n co n trol equipmen t w here the metals co n ce n tration of tihe 

### XACT-extracted sample of stack aerosol will 

### be representative or the meta ls concentra tion (ug/m 3 ) 

### in t he efflue n t e mitted from the stack. Specifica l ly , 

### the monitor location will 

### be 

### at least

• 2 equivalent d u ct diamete rs downs tream from the n eares t con tro l device, point of poll ution gene rat ion o r o th er poi nt at which a change I n th e pol l uta nt concentration or emlssion rate may occu r . 2 equivalent d uct diameters upstream from the efflue nt exhaust. T he equiva l ent duct diamet er is ca l c ula ted as pe r 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix 

### A Meth od 1 , S e ction 2 .1. A representati v e sample of stack gas will be drawn from the stack at a n approxi mate rate of o n e c u bic meter 

### per m i n u te , i mmediately heated to a temperature above the dew poin t lor most acids , and ma i nta i ned at that t e m perature during tran sport through heat-traced and i nsu l a ted stai n less stee l tub i ng to a n Instrument shed h ousing the GEMS and othe r mo n rt oring in strume nts . 3.2 . 2.3 Installation T he XACT GEMS 

### wilt be i nstalled per man u factu r e r' s reccmmendations. Once t he system i s i nstalled , it will be commissioned for use. Th is exercise w il verify tihe 

### system I s I nstalled property per tihe 

### ma n ufacturer's s pecifiCation. 3 . 2 . 2.4 I nstrument Span T he operating range of the XACT GEMS w i ll be estab l ished du r i ng the GEMS cert ifi ca tion period. U ll y wi ll vemy that the operati ng range (zero to span) will en compass the res ponse of th e XACT GEMS for all e xpe cted waste streams. T he HWC MACT em i ssion li m its. for the three metal classes . will fa ll w ithin th i s meas ureme nt range. 3.2 . 2 . 5 System Start ... p ( Initi a l Operation) The initia l start - up of the XACT GEMS will be a t Cooper Envi ronmental Services. The XACT GEMS wi ll be operated , s amp li n g room air , to s ha ked own the system . Once the system 

### is operat i ng**w~hout** 

### errors, the XACT GE MS will un dergo a Factory Acceptance Test to ve ri fy that tihe 

### system meets o r exceeds the functional criteria .



### 29 Rev . 7.0 

## VES009377

### E li W il y a nd Com p an y L a f ayette , I ndia n a 

### 3 . 2 . 2 . 5 . 1 Facto ry A cce p ta n ce T e s t A l te rnati v e M o n i tori ng Petiti on

The Factory Accepta n ce Test will 

### be execu ted at Cooper E n vi r onme n tal Services . The objecti v e of th is te sting is to ens u re the XACT G E MS meets or exceeds th e fu nct i onal operating cri t eria. Res u lts of the Factory Accepta nce Test w i ll 

### be doCume nted and include t he f ollowi ng major compone n ts: 

### 1. Manual Check Lis t 

### 2. Na ti onal i n stitute of Standards and TeChno l ogy (NIST) Traceable Thin Film Ca l ibrallo n 

### 3. XRF E nergy Alignment Check 

### 4 . Stability Check 

### 5. B l ank Bias Check (zero drift check) 

### 6. XRF I nstrume n t 

### Drift Check ( u pscale d rill c h eck ) 

### 7. Flow Rat e D ri ll Check 

### 8. MACT M eta l L i nea ri ty Check 

### 9 . MACT M etal R elative Accuracy Check 

### 3 . 2 . 2 . 6 Sy s tem Start-up ( F i e l d i nsta llati on ) Once the XACT GEMS is i nsta ll ed, 

### the syst em w ill u ndergo an I nstallatio n qualification (IQ) 

### to ensure the system is i nstalled to manufacture r 's recomme ndations and that th e system meets a ll safety requ i rements . Fol l owi ng successfu l 

### I Q , the system will operate , s ampl i ng amb i ent a ir , for s everal wee ks . Once the XACT GEMS has operated for severa l weeks withou t sign i fican t issues, Li ll y will (1) 

### Ca l ibrate (or check cal i brat i o n ) t he XRF (2) 

### Begin r o u ti n e da i ly QNQC (3) 

### Beg i n da i ly system Check for appropriate ope ra t i on. The XAC T GEMS wi ll operate con tln uoosty in this mode (at least fo u r weeks) prior to the performance specificat i o n test. 

### 3 .2.2.6 .1 N IST T r ac ea ble Thin Film C a librati o n During th e infti al sta rt -up 

### of the XACT CEMS, 

### the XRF wi ll 

### be calibrated u s i ng NI ST tra cea b l e thin fi l m standards. This cal i brat i on will establis h ca li bratio n factors fo r eaCh of t he meta l s to 

### be a na l yzed. The calibration factors are used to provide u g/s pot quantitati on for eaCh m e tal analyzed. After the XACT CE M S Is i nsta ll ed at Lilly , th e caUbratlon factors wiD be Checked by u si ng th i n fi l m standards for up to fi ve 

### 30 Rev. 7.0 

# VES009378

### Eli Ully and Company Lafayette , I nd i ana Alternative Monitoring P et ition diffe re nt meta l s (at l east one metal for eacll of the th ree metals classes). T he XACT CEMS XRF will be re-ca l ib rat ed 

## n th e relative perce nt d ifference is g reate r than 10% by using the 

### following equation: 

# I R - R 

# I CA Accuracy = 

### cws REF 

## "tOO RR£ F 

### where: CA = X-ray fl uoresce n ce calibration accuracy 

### Rca.os = the va l ue of the standard reported by th e CE MS**~** 

### = the k nown va l ue of the standard 3.2.2.6.2 Routine Dally Quality Assurance and Qua l ity Control The XACT CEMS conducts a u tomatic precision cllec ks with every samp l e ru n as we ll as dai ly upscale and b l a n k measureme n ts ( zero and upsca l e drift c hecks). Th ese chec ks en sure that the XRF data 

### Is precise; m i nimal bla nk bia s i s occ urrin g, and signlfocant i nstrument drift has not taken p l ace. SpecifiCally , the XACT C E MS w i ll automati cally (1) clleck energy a l i gn ment ( 2 ) check X RF stability (3) c h eck zero drift ( 4 ) clleck u psca l e drift (5) check samp le flow d rift. 3 . 2.2 . 6.3 Dai l y System Check Operatio ns will ma n ually perfonn a daily clleck of the XACT CEMS. The da i ly clleck w i ll be documen ted. 3.2 . 2.7 Perfonnance Specification Test Once t he XACT CEMS in stallation an d in iba l field ope ra tio n have bee n ach ieved, a validati on of the XACT CEMS wi ll be perfo r med with 

### haza rdous waste . Data collected d urin g these 

### t ests wi ll provide a n in iti a l validat i on of th e XACT CEMS . Thi s validation will a l low th e u se of 

### the XACT CEMS to 

### demonstrate contin uous compliance with the HWC MACT metals em i ssion l imits. The perfonna n ce specifi cat i on test will be performed to determi ne the 

### accuracy , bias, prec ision, stability, and cyc l e ti me of 

### the XACT CEMS. Th e following chec ks w i ll be perfonned as part 

### of t he pe rfonn a nce specifi cation test C ycl e Ti me: Th e XACT CEMS will adhere to Perfo r mance Specification YY (Sp ecificat i o n s and Test Proced u res for 

### X-ray F luo rescence Based 

### Mu lti-Meta l s Co nti n uous E miss io n Monitori n g Systems at Stationary Sources prepared by Coope r Envi r onmen ta l Services. LLC). Perfonnance Specification YY i s 

### 31 Rev . 7.0 

## VES009379

### Ell Lilly and Company Lafayette, Indiana Alternative Mo n itoring Petition provi ded in Appendix B. P u rsuant to Section 1 . 2. 1 of Performance Specificati on YY , the CEMS must have a cycle time that is less th an one - third the period of the appficable standard . For this appl i cation, the cyde 

### time will not exceed fifteen min utes. Stratifi cation Test: T h e strat ifica tion test , described i n sect i on 3 . 1 . 2.6 , f or PM CEMS, will 

### be applied to me et this requirement for the XACT CEMS. X-ray F lu orescence Calibra tion Check: The XACT C E MS will adhere to Performa nce Specification 

### YY when conducting th e X-ray Fl u oresce nce Ca l ib r a t i on Check. Using NIST traceab l e standards, t h e XACTXRF 

### is challe ng e d three t i mes for each met al measu r ed . 

### The erro r 

### is ca lcul ated according to the f ollowing equati on: 

# I R - R 

# I CA 

### = C F.M.< RF.F 

## "'00

RR EF where: CA = X-ray fl uorescence ca li bration 

### accuracy 

### RcEMs =the value of t he sta ndard reported 

### by th e CEMS ( u g) 

### R,.., 

### = the know n val ue of the s t a nda1d (ug) The a verage error of t he t h r ee meas urements for each meta l m u st 

### be l ess than 10% of the cal i brati o n standard ' s value for each metaL Stability : Th e 7- Day Cal i bratio n Drift Test: The XACT CEMS 

### will ad h ere to Performa n ce Speci fi catio n 

### YY when conducting th e 7-day Calibration 

### Drift Test. The stab i lity test will 

### be performed prior 

### to t he accuracy t esting. T he CEMS must meet the follow i ng specifications for each of the seven consecutive days , without any adj ustments or cali b rations made to the CEMS: • zero drift S20% 

### (of t h e em i ss ion l imit value ) determined by th e fo ll owi ng equation : 

## ZDi

w here: ZDi = t he zero dri ft of the 

# r• element(%) 32 Rev . 7 .0 

# V

E$009380

### Ell Lilly an d Company Lafa yette , I ndiana A lte rn ati v e Monitori ng Petitio n Riao 1 

### .os = the meas u red CEMS response t o the zero standa rd for 

### the i 1 " 

### ele m e n t Rio£, = t he referen ce value 

### of the 

# r• elemen t on 

### the zero standa rd Cl = 

### the emiss i o n O mit of the 1 1" 

### element. Lilly wi ll con s ide r the emiss i on limit of the I ndivid ual metalS (C I ) to 

### be equal to the HWC MACT l im it 

### for th e m e ta l class. For e xamp l e , the emiss i on limit for lead 

## wm be co nsidered to b e 120 ug/dscm fo r th e purposes o f determ in i n g zero d ri ft fo r th e XACT. • upsca l e drift: S 15% (of th e reference va l ue) dete nnined by t he following eq u ation:

l o; 

## - Ri 

# I UDi**_I' ~CCMs**  R£F 

### *100 

## RinEP where: UDi =the upsca l e dri ft o f the i "' elemen t( %) R ia; , ... = t he meas u red CEMS respo n se to the upscale standard fo r the i"' element. Rl ..,. = the re ference value of the 1 1" 

### element on the upscale standard

• volume o f fl ow 

### drift: s 20% (of i nstrument span) detennined by the following equatio n :

where: 

# I V - V I VD - CE.VSI< M • 

## I 00 

# FS VO = Volume drift (%) 

### VcEJJt;tt = S a mp le gas volume o r fl ow measured b y th e C EMS vo l u me check m e asuremen t device. 

### Vm =Sample g as vo l ume or fl ow reported by 

### the mu lt i-met als CEMS FS = F ull sca l e val u e of the CEMS volume o r flow meas urem en t



### 33 R ev. 7.0 

# VES009381Ell U ll y and Company L a f ayette, I ndiana A lternative Monitoring Petition C E MS Accuracy : The XACT CEMS will adhere to Perfo rmance SpecifiC8ti o n 

### YY when determ i n i ng the CEMS accuracy . Th e aocuracy of the XACT CEMS Is determ i n ed using one of the follo wing fo ur opllons and 

### performance**cr~ eria** **:** • Opti on 

### A:. Li nearity test of th e enUre CEMS

- s l ope : 0.85 · 1 . 15

- r;, 0 .90

- i ntercept < 20% o f emission l imit for each meta l

• O pt ion B : L i nearity test of the XR F and sampl i ng modu l es separate l y from t he sam p le interface. Th is option will also lnd u de a Tra n sport Effl dency Test

- slope: 0.85·1. 1 5

- r:< 0.90

- i ntercept < 20% o f emisslon li mit for each metal

- Percent transport :<90% or S1 10%

• Option C: Re l a ti ve bias ofthe e ntire CEMS

- Re l ative % Bias 

### s 15% for each metal 

### % RSD 

## s 10% for each metal

- r;, 0 .90 for the meta l used to demo n s trate the 3-fold ch ange

• Option D: R elat i ve 

### b ias o f tihe XR F a n d samp l in g modules sepa rately from t he samp le i nt erface. This option will a l so indude a Transport Etrociency Test.

- Re l ati ve % Bias 

## s 15% for each meta l

- % RSD 

## s 10% for each metal

- r ;, 0.90 for the metal used to demonstrate t he 3-fo l d chan g e

- Percenttranspo rt <:90% or S1 10% 3 . 2 . 2.8 Routine Operation of the Mult i- Meta l s CEMS T he qu al ity assurance req u irements w i ll ad h ere to Procedure Z: Q u al ity Assurance Requirements fo r X· ray Flu oresceriC8 Based Mu lti - Metals Conti nu ous E m i ssio n Monitoring Systems at StatiOnary Sources prepared b y Coope r En viro n me n ta l Servi ces, LLC . Procedure Z is located in Append i x B. 

### 34 Rev . 7 . 0 

# VES009382

### E li Lilly a nd Compan y L afa yette , I ndi ana A lt e rnat i v e M onitori ng P et i tion 3. 2 . 2 . 8 . 1 Da ily Qu al ity As s ura nce Check s Each day , ope rati o ns w i ll manually perform a da i ly ch eck of 

### lhe XACT CEMS . Re s ulls will be documented. T h e XACT CEMS conducts at.rtomatic p recision checks with every sample run as well as dai ly upscale and b l a nk measurements (zero drift, upscale drift, and vo l ume ( flow) ch ecks) . These checks ensure tha t the XRF data Is precise; min lma . l bl a nk bias 

### Is occurrin g, and significant instrument drift has not t ake n place. Specificall y, t he XACT CEMS w i ll au tomatica l ly (1) check energy al i gnment (2) check XR F stabili ty (3) roeck zero drift {4) check u pscale d ri ft (5) ch e c k sa m p l e ft ow drift. For ea ro dally ch eck, the percent drift cannot exceed: • zero d r ift 20% i n te r ms of the emission l imit • upsca l e dri ft: 15% i n terms of th e basel i ne va l ue f or each met al • vo lu me ft ow : 20% i n terms of i ns tr umen t spa n 3 . 2 . 2 .8 . 2 Qu a rt erly A udit 3 . 2 . 2. 8. 2 .1 F i rst Qua rt e rly A ud it after Pe rf o rm ance S p e ci fication T est T he first quarterly aud it afte r the performance specificat ion t est w ill cons ist of th e C EM S accuracy test described i n Section 3.2.2.7. XR F calibration factors wi D also be checked by pe rform ing an X- ray Fluorescence Ca l ibration**d~ .**  

### For ead1 eleme nt measured , the percent differ ence must not exceed 1 0%. E ach quarter , a samp l e volume ( fl ow) aud i t w i ll b e performed . T he averag e o f t hree vo l umes, t a ken at d iffere n t measure m ent cyc les, m ust not exceed 1 0 % of the re fere n ce va l ue. The e n ti re XACT CEMS and transport system will 

### be exam i ned 

### for prob l ems, suro as particulate bui ld up. App ropriate preven tative main te nance w ill 

### be performed on the CEMS. 3 . 2 . 2 .8 . 2.2 S ubs eque nt Qu arterl y A udits Each quarter the XRF calibration fa cto rs will be chec ked by perform i ng an X-ray Auorescence Calibrati on**Aud ~.**  

### F or earo e l ement measured, the percent differe n ce must not exceed 1 0%. Each quarter. a samp l e volume (flow)**au d~**  

### w ill be perfo r med. Th e average o f three volumes , taken at diffe rent m easu rem ent cycles, must not exceed 1 0% of t he re ference va lue . The entire XACT C E MS and transport syste m wi ll 

### be exam i ned for problems, s uch as p a rti culate bu il d up . Approp ri ate preve ntat ive ma i nt enance will be performed o n t he C E MS.



## 35 Rev. 7.0 

# VES009383Ell Ully and Company Lafayette, I nd i ana 

### 3.2.2. 8 . 3 Annual Aud i t Alternative Monitoring Petition

A n n u a l ly , i n add iti on to t h e q u arte rl y checks, the XACT CEMS 

### will be checked for accuracy (Performa n ce Specificat i o n 

### YY). The accura cy will 

### be determi ned u sing o n e of the four options and respective performance criteri a : • Opt i on A: L i n eari ty te s t of th e entire CEMS s l ope : 0 . 85- 1 . 1 5**~** 0.90 i ntercept < 20% o f emission li m it for each meta l

• Opti on B: Linearity t est of th e XRF and sampl i ng modules separa te ly from the sa m pl e i nte rf ace. This o ption 

### will a l so i n clude a Transport Effic i ency Test s l ope: 0.85-1.15**~** 0.90 in te r cep t < 20% of emission lim it for each metal Perce nt transpor1 «90% o r 

## s 1 1 0%

• Optio n C: Relative b i as of the en ti re C E M S Re lative% Bias 

### s 15% for each meta l % RSO 

## s 10% for each meta l r**~** 0 . 90 for the meta l u sed to demonstrate the 3-fold change

• Optio n 

### 0 : Re l a ti ve bias o f the XRF and samp l ing modules sepa r a te l y from th e sample i nt erface . Th i s o pti on 

### wi ll a l so i n clud e a Tr anspor1 Efficie n cy Tesl Relati ve % Bias 

## s 1 5 % for each meta l % RSD 

## s 1 0% fo r each met a l r 

### <: 0 . 90 for the me tal used to demo n strate the 3-fo l d ch ange Percent transport**90%** or 

## s 1 10%



### 36 Rev. 7 .0 

# VES009384

### Ell L illy and Compa ny Laf a yette, I n d i ana 3 .2 . 2 . 9 C om ponen t Re p lacement Alternative Monitoring Petition

Du ri ng no rm al opera ti on of the XAG T G E MS , specific compo ne n ts will n eed to be replaced . Th e XAG T GEMS sta nd ard ope rating proced u res will address the criteria to be met upon replace m ent of significant compo nents. 3 .2 . 2.10 Out of Control The o u t of contro l peri od will begi n immediate ly afte r t h e l ast test ru n or check of an unsuccess fu l zero d rift, upscale d rift . sample 

### flow drift, or uns uccessfu l accu racy aud it. The ou t of co n tro l period en ds I mmed ia te l y afte r the last t est run or check of the subsequen t successfu l a u d ij o r drift check, when the PM GEMS 

### is used as a back- up or when the i n ci nerator enters parametric mode. When th e In c i nerator 

### is operati ng I n parametric mode, t h e XAGT GEMS w i ll not be deemed o ut 

### of control.

3 . 2 . 3 Use of the XACT Mult i M e tals CEMS to Demonstrate Compliance with the HWC MACT M e tals Standards Li ll y may beg i n using the XAG T GE M S to demonstrate co nti nuous compl iance w ith the H WC MACT m eta l s emissio n standards only after the followi ng I s achieved: • A successfu l Performance Speci fica tio n Test 

### Is performed following EPA' s approva l o f th is Alternative Mo ni to ri ng**Pet~ion .**  

### • A modification to 

### the TrU e V permit is approved that Incorporates th e re qu irements o f the approved Alternati ve Monito ri ng Petit i on. Fo ll owing comp l e ti on o f t he above , on-go i ng quality assu r ance wi ll be pe rformed o n the XAG T GEMS as spec lf oed In Secti on 3.2 . 2.8 of thi s document.

3 . 2.4 Mon itoring Frequ ency and Averag in g Time T he mu ltl -illetals G E MS wiD mon i tor and record concentratio n va l ues (f'Q i dscm) of mercury, 

### tow vol at i le m eta l s (arsenic a nd chro m i um ; a defa ul t value will 

### be in corporated for be ryllium), a nd semlvolati te metals (l ead and cadmi u m) at l east once every 15 m inutes.



### 37 Rev. 7.0 

# VES009385

### Eli L illy and Com p any Lafay ette, In d ia na Alte r nati ve M o n i to r in g Pet iti on The metals conce!'ltrations will be CO<Tected to 7% oxygen by the following equatio n:

whe re: 

### M - \1 • 

### 21 - 7 (V)I'f'**-~** UIIW'J• 

### 2 1 - 0, M""' = Mercury , semivo l atile metals, o r low 

### volati l e meta l s conce ntrat i on corrected to 7% oxygen**(~g/ scm)**  

### M ,. .,,., Mercury, semivo lati le meta l s , o r l ow volat ile metals stack gas concentration**g/dscm)** 

### 0, = Oxygen stack gas percen t (vol % 

### dry) A n ho urly b l ock average wi ll be calcu lated f rom 

### the fo u r 15 m in ute measurements duri ng the h our as shown 

### in the fo l lowing equation: 

# ' 

# L Ci 

## HBA 

# = ; • I 

## 4 where: HBA = Hourly b l ock average value (ug/dscm ) Cl = a fiftee n min ute observat i on from the CEMS analyzer ( u g/dscm) T

he estab l ished beryllium defauH value will be added to the fifteen-m i nute chromium and arsenic CEMS observations to calculat e the L VM how1y block average. Valid results must be availab le for at least three of the 1 5-m i n ute cyc l es of ope ration to ca lculate a o nehour block average. Twe l ve - ho ur rol ling averages will be ca l cu l ated based on 

### the average of t h e twelve most recen t**hou~y** 

### block averages as shown in the following equat ion : 12 

# L HBA THRA 

## = I • I 

## 12 Whe re: T HRA = Tw elve hour rolli ng average value ( u gldscm) HBA = Hourly b l ock average val ue (ug/dscm) 

### 38 

### Rev. 7.0 

# VES009386Eli Lill y and Company Laf ayette, I n di ana AHematlve Mon ito r i n g Pet i t ion The**~velve-hour** rolling ave r age will be updat ed every ho ur when a n ew hOu rl y block average is calcu l a ted. 3.2 . 5 B l ock Average Calcu lation s during Multi - Metal s CEMS Daily Checks and O n going Quality Assurance Check s T he XACT C E MS wi l.l be off l i ne up to one hour each day to perform the daily q ual ity assurance checks . Block average ca l c ulatio ns will b e frozen du ri ng the dally u psca l e and zero checks. Lilly will continue to burn hazardous waste during the da il y q ua l ity assurance checks. Block average calcu l ations will res u me once the checks are performed. The twelve -h ou r roll i ng block ave r age ca l c ulati ons will resume by add in g the first vali d h our block average after the drift 

### check to th e previous 11-hour block average values. I n ad d iti on, bled< average ca l culati ons will 

### be frozen d u ring the quarterly and an n ua l a u dits. Ro ll ing block average ca l cu l at i ons w ill resume once th ese q ua l ity ass u rance chec ks are completed . 3.2 . 6 Mul ti- M etals CE M S Backup I n the even t the m u lti-melals C E MS is not operat in g , L illy will have t he opti on to u se the PM C E MS as a b acku p to the m u l ti -meta l s CEMS under the follow i ng conditions: 1 . Results oblained from parallel operation o f th e two CEMS**t** be used to develop a technica l justificatio n of h ow t he PM CEMS provides reasonab l e assurance o f compliance w ith the HWC MACT meta ls emission sta n dard. 2 . When the mu lti -metals CEMS i s not operati ng 

### and the PM C E MS beg i ns use as a backup, Li lly will u se 

### i ts best efforts t o avoid i n tro d u ci ng new waste streams ( i .e. those that have not been historically b u rned wh i le the**~** C E MS were in parallel operation) fr om the six " in -feed" conveyors t o the fina l " merge" co n veyor th a t leads to the kil n feed c h ute. In order to allow CEMS mode to establish waste st reams that are not " new" during its i niti al implementation period, the above restrictions on u se o f the PM CEMS serving as a backup lo r the multi m etals CEMS wi ll apply only after a s uffi cie nt time period ha s elapsed ( no t to exceed 6 mo n ths from the first CEMS 

### mode ope rat i on ) for Lilly to ga i n expe ri ence while processing a va r iety of existing solid waste st reams . Fi nally, Li l ly w i ll altempl to mainta i n no mi nally stable or h i sto ri cally lower feed rates o f wast e whi l e 

### the backup i s be i ng u sed , and wi ll li m it the use of th e PM CEMS as a back up for the m u l ti- melals CEMS to 14 consecutive days pe r ep i sode . Li l ly will use Its best efforts to mini m ize th e time that th e PM CEMS acts as a backup t o the XACT CEMS. To fa cil itate its efforts , Lill y will keep spare pa rts in stock and w i ll mainla i n a servi ce relat ions hi p**w~h** the XACT CEMS ma n u fact urer , o r o the r qualified consulta n ts. 

### If both the PM CEMS and 

### the m u l ti - metals 

### 39 Rev. 7.0 

# VES009387Ell Lilly and Company Lafayette, Indiana AHernatlve Mon ito ring Pet itio n CEMS are not i n use , LiHy will monitor operating paramete r limits defined 

### in Secllon 1209 of the HWC MACT (I . e. parametric operatiOn). Deta i ls of the specific operating l imits are provided in the Notificati on of Comp l iance (NOC). Li ll y w n t I ncorpo r ate de l ays when transl t lo n i ng from the CEMS mode of operation to the parametric mode of operatiOn. Speciftcally , once the 

### primary mu lti-metals CEMS and the 

### backup PM CEMS are u navailable , the contro l system 

### will au tomatica ll y switch to the pa r ametri c mode of opera tiOn. Rol l ing averages , re lat ed to the Air Pollutio n Con t rol System ( APCS), 

### will not sta rt unm the system has been unde r the parametric mode 

### of operation for 10 minutes . Th i s 10-m i nute time period w ill allow Lilly lime to make any adj u stments to the APCS to bri ng t he system t o withi n the respective operating parameter lim its. In add i tion, 

### up to four hours 

### will be allowed before re-starti ng constitue nt feed rat e roj ll ng average ope rati ng parameter li mits i n order to clear the s o l id feed conveyor system. (Note that , i n a simi l ar fash i o n to the "backup" scenario described above, Lil ly will use its best efforts to avoid i ntroducing "n ew" waste streams from the sbc " i n - feed" conveyors t o the final " merge " conveyor t hat l eads t o 

### the k i l n feed ch ute du r in g this fou r hour period . However, d u ring i nitial CEMS 

### mode operati o n pe ri ods there wi ll be practi ca l limitat iO n s to th is criterion beca u se few waste streams 

### will have been bumed .) F eed rates will be maintained nom ina lly stable or h i storical l y lower tha n whe n operati ng In CEMS mode. 

### If the CEMS m o d e of operation i s st m n ot avaaable after fou r hours, the transition to parametric mode w i ll be comple ted and o n l y waste with known composition wi ll be processed in t he incinerator so that consmuen t feed r a te operati ng parameter l imits can be computed.

3 . 3 HYDROGEN CHLORIDE (H CI ) CEMS 3 . 3.1 Ind icator of Performance The HC I CEMS I s designed to conti n uously mon ito r the stack gas HCI concentratio n . Comp li ance wi th the HCVC1 2 HWC MACT em i ssiO n standard wi ll 

### be demonstrated when the measured stack concentration 

### of HCI combi n ed with the d efautt ch lo rine concentration is l ess t han or equa l to t he applicab l e s tandard. C u rren tly . Li ll y must comply with th e HCI I CI, HWC MACT i nteri m standard of 21 ppmvd. correct ed to 7 perce nt oxygen, specifi ed unde r Section 63.1203(b) o f t he HWC MAC T . Lilly wi ll comply with the HWC MACT fi nal HCVC 1 2 standa r d spe ci fi ed i n SectiOn 63.1219(a) n o l ater than 

### the date required by Section 1206(a)(1)(11) of th e HWC MACT final replacement standards. The averaging time 

### is over a 1 2 - h our period, updated every m i nute .



### 40 Rev. 7.0 

# VES009388Eli Lilly a n d Company L afayette, Ind iana 3 . 3 .2 M eas urement Tec h n i q u e 3 . 3. 2.1 Operat i ng Principles Altern a tive M onito ring Pe t ition

The HCI GEMS Is an Ecochem Multi-Component I nfra r ed Ana lyzer ( MC3), or equ i va l ent. ma nufactured by Ecoche m Ana lytics. Th e MC3 mon rt ors the st ack g as sample fo r H CI concentrations. The MC3 also measu res stack gas concentrations of carbo n mo noxide (CO), oxygen**(~).** carbon d i oxide (C0 2) . s uff ur dioxide (S0 2 ) and nitroge n oxides (NO,) . I n addrt i on , the MC3 meas u res 

### the mo i stu re co nt ent of 

### the stac k gas . Fig ures 3 and 5 schematica ll y I ll ustrate the major compone n ts of the MC3, which in d ude: 1. Samp l e Extraction System 2 . Pressure Regulat i on Modu l e 3. Ecochem Mu l ti -Component I nf r a red Analyzer 4. System Co ntroller 5. Data Acquisition Syste m an d Historian 3 .3 .2. 1 . 1 Samp l e Extrac tion System The samp l e extractio n system consists of two elements ; a sample probe and a heated umbilical l ine. The heated sample probe is M&C Prod u cts Sample Drift Probe. or eq u ivale n t, ma nufactur>1 d by M&C P r od ucts. To provide accurate measurement o f HCI , the samp l e extraction system , sample l i ne a nd probe, provides a hot. wet samp l e to the MC3; el i m i nati ng the scrubbi ng of water- soluble compounds such as HCI and S0 2• The M&C Produ cts Samp l e Drift Probe provides th e capabi lity of sampl i ng a water saturated gas st ream, reduci ng the affect of water d roplets at the sample po i n t (first step in elimi n ati ng the wate r soluble aerosol) . Opera tion of the sa m ple p robe ( tem perat u re. sam ple , purge, cal i b ratio n modes) 

### is controlled by a Programmable Logic Co ntrolle r (PLC); l ocated In t h e MC3 sample cabi net. T h e sa m p l e u m bilica l l i ne has the functio n of (1) providing cal ib ra

ti on gas to the probe for daily zero and upscale span checks (2) provid i ng calibration gas to t he pro be for li nea rity aud its (3) providing a hot , wet samp l e to the MC3 analyzer. The sample umbi l ica l 

### is des i gned to operate at temperatures of approxi mately 

### 180 

## •c; whic h is Imperative for hot, wet samp li ng of HC I , mo i st u re, and S0 2 •



### 41 Rev. 

### 7.0 

# VES009389Eli Lilly an d Comp any Lafayette, In d iana 3 . 3 . 2 .1. 2 Pre ss ure Regulati on Module A lternative M onitoring Peti ti on

The pressu r e r egulation modu l e i s designed to remove b oth f ree particulates and water-so l uble aerosols from the gas stream prior to ana l ys i s by the MC3 a na lyzers . T he system a l so provides a sa mp l e gas to t he MC3 at a co n stant pressu re . Co ntrol of thls system res i des 

### With the PLC In t he MC3 cabi n et. The p r essu r e reg ulat i on m odu l e is desig n ed to main tai n a temperature of a t l east 180 Ce l s i u s. m in i m izing scru bb in g of HC I , moisture , and S0 2 • 3.3 . 2 . 1 .3 Ecocllem Mufti-Compon en t Infra r ed Analyzer The sample extraction system delivers a hot, wet sample to 

### the Ecoche m Mu lti- Com po n e nt i nfrared Ana lyzer. The MC3 quan titates stack gas concentrations of CO, 0 2 , C0 2 , S0 2 • NO,, H,O and HCI. HC I analys i s occu rs by u s i ng sing l e beam d u a l waveleng th nond i spersi v e i nfra re d s pectroscopy. The HCI gas absorbs i n frared radiation at a specific wave l engt h , w h ich depe n ds on its molecula r structure. The degree of absorpt i on is proport i ona l to t he concentration of t he target gas . Final values are reported by t he PLC I n pp mv , dry un i ts. Beca u se the HC I I C I, HWC MACT emiss i on l i mit is 

### based on com bine d stack emiss i ons of hydrogen chloride and chlori ne gas and the MC3 on ly meas ur es hydrogen chlo ride , Ully has deve l oped a conservative default value for the ch l orine concentra ti on. Fortuna tely the amount of c hl ori ne present i n stack gas from i ncinerators s i m i l ar to the s olid-l i q u id incine rator 

### is typ ica lly very l ow, particu l arly if they burn aqueo us wastes and h ave 

### wei a i r pollutio n con tr ol systems. Li lly has tasted i ts incinerator in Mayag u ez , Puerto Rico that is eq ui pped wit h th e same a ir pollu ti o n control system a nd bums s i m il ar liqu i d wastes as the solid ·l iquid l nclnera tOI' . The r esu lls showed c h lorine levelS much less than 1 ppm (NOTE: During th is test ing , the bromine/ ch l orine a nd s u lf u r/chlorine waste compos i ti on ratios were below l evels that EPA believes cou l d result In a negati ve meas ur eme n t bias.) To be co n servative, Li ll y will use 1 ppm as the default va l ue for ch i OI' i ne. Therefore. a va l ue of 1 ppm will be added to t h e measured va l ue of HC I before comparison to the HWC MACT em i ssion sta n dard. I f the CPT data or any other evid ence indica tes the default va l ue i s not appropri ate, 

### it will be adju sted accordingly . 3.3 .2.1.4 System Contro l ler A PLC provi des contro l of t he MC3, sample probe , pressure regulation m odule. an d the sample interface . T h e PLC provides one m in ute averaged d ata, and validi t y status. for each analyte m eas ur ed as we ll as flow. The ca li brat i on a nd l i n ea rity pro ce d ures are a l so co ntr o l led by th e PLC . Al l data, and stat u s flags. are sen t to a data acq u i s i tion syst em tor data formatt i ng a n d comp l i ance determination.



### 42 Rev. 7 . 0 

# VES009390E li Lilly and Company Lafayette , I ndi ana 

### 3 . 3 . 2. 1 . 5 Data Acquisit i on System an d Histori an Alt e r native Monitorin g Peti ti on

HC i concentrations i n pa rt per**n~ lli** **on** correct ed for moist u r e. data status. qual ily ass u rance data , stat us nags, and system operationa l stat u s/ala r ms a r e passed 

### to a data**acqu s~ion**  syste m (OAS ) via modbus communication fro m t he MC3 PLC. Th e OAS performs t he d a t a calculations f or compliance . All d ata, both system status and H CI concen t ratio n s , are saved In a n historian . 

### 3 . 3. 2 . 2 I nstallati on 

### L ocatlon Th e HC I CEMS extra cts ft s sample from 

### the Rue gas stream I n th e stack. Secti on 

### 3 .1. 1 of Performance Specifi cat io n 2 p rovi des gu idance r e gard i ng approp ri a te mon it o r location . Th i s meas urement l oca tio n i s a !l east:



### • 2 e qu ivale nt d u ct d i ameters downstream f rom the neares t cont rol devi ce. po i nt o f pol l utio n generatio n or o th er po int at whic h a c h ange In t h e po ll utant concent ration or emiss i on ra te may occur. 

### • 0.5 eq ui valent duct diameters upstream fr om the effluen t exha u st. 

### 3 .3 . 2.3 I nst allation The MC3 system will 

### be I nsta ll ed per ma n u facturer's recommendati o n s. On ce the system I s i nsta l led , i t w ill 

### be commiss i oned fo r use . T h is exercise will ve rify the system 

### is install ed pro perl y p e r t he manufa ct ur er's spedfocation . 

### 3 . 3 .2 . 4 Instrument Span T h e span fo r th e HCI CEMS I s 

### 100 pp m v . An In strument span whic h covers 

### the expect e d pea k l evels will hel p to ensure that th e 12- h our rolling average val u e correctly accoun ts f or the short periods of mora concen trated**ss ons** **.** Addftio n al fy. 

### 100 ppmv H C I caflbration g as 

### is an HCI blen ding concentrat i o n m uch prefe rred by ve ndors . 

### Due to the h i g h reactivity of HCI , 

### it i s d ifficuH 

### to e n sure 

### the co nt i nui ng accu racy o f th e ca l i brati on gas at 

### lower conce n trati o n s . 

### 3.3.2.5 Syst em Start-up (I nitia l Operation) 

### 3 . 3 .2. 5 . 1 Fact ory A ccep lan ce Test 

### The Factory Acceptance T est will be executed at Ecochem Analyt l cs. T he ob jective of th i s t esti ng is to ensure 

### the Ecochem CEMS meets or exceeds th e functiona l operatin g criteria. Res ults of the Factory Acce ptance Test will 

### be docume nted and i n c l ude the following majo r co m pone nts: 1 . Sam ple E xtractio n System 

### 4 3 Rev. 7.0 

## VES00939lE ll 

### Lilly and Company Lafayette , Indiana 2 . P r ess ure Regul at i o n Modu le 3. System Config u rat i on 4. Ecochem Mu l ti - Compo ne nt I nfrared Analyzer 5 . Sys1em Control l er 

### 3.3.2 . 6 System Start-up (Field Installation) Alternative Monitoring Petition



### Once th e Ecoche m CEMS i s I n sta lled, the system w i ll unde rgo a n i nsta ll a ti on qual ifi cation ( I Q) to ens ure t he system is in stalled p e r th e m anufactu rer reco mmendations. F o ll owing successful I Q o f the MC3, 

### the system wi ll operat e sam pl in g am bie nt a i r for several weeks. During this t i me, MC3 operati onal i ssues wi ll be ad dresse d. O n ce t he MC3 system has ope rated f or seve ral we eks without sig nifi ca nt issues , dally 

### QA procedures will beg i n (zero an d u pscale drift chec ks, alarm moni torin g , a n d completion 

### ol a dai ly system chec k sheet). Th e MC3 syste m wiD operate in thi s mode u n ti l t he i ncin e rator 

### is 

### rea dy to treat waste . 

### 3 . 3 .2. 7 P e rformanc e Specltlcation Test Th e certi fi cation of t h e Ecochem CEMS for HCI wil l follow the HC I CEMS Performance Speci fi cation (a«ached as appendix C). Specifi ca lly, th e fol l owi ng will b e ei th e r tested 01 docu mented: 1 ) d ata recorder s cale , 2 ) daily calibrati on drift, 3) I nstallation and measuremen t locati on, 4) cal i bratio n drift test , 5) cal i bratio n error te st , 6) system r es p onse time, 7) s tratification test , 

### and , 8) accuracy determination. Upon s u ccessfu l com p leti on/ve rifi catio n of th e above tests. the Ecochem CEMS ca n 

### be u sed to s h ow continu ous compliance t he HWC MACT HCI/CI; emission sta n da rd. Each t est i s d es cri bed b e low : 

### 3.3.2..7.1 Data Recorder Scale The rang e of the data recorde r and the measure men t range of t he HC I CEMS w i ll 

### be docu ment ed. Th e daily zero and u psca l e ca l i bration c hecks wil l fa ll wi t hi n th i s range . The H C I CEMS will 

### have a m easureme nt range o f 

### 0 · 1 00 ppm H C I. 

### 3 . 3 . 2.7 . 2 Da il y Calibration Drift 

### The ze r o and u ps c ale d rift w ill be checked once daily. Zero gas ( 0 ppm H CI) will 

### be used for the zero, and approx i mately 

### 50 - 100 ppmv HC I for t h e u pscale. The ca li brat io n drift l i m H 

### will 

### be 5% of t he in s tru men t span, 01 

### ± 5 ppmv. Zero and high-l eve l cal i bration dri fts shall be adj usted , a t a mi ni m um , whe n eve r the 24 - hour ze ro drift exceeds t h e limits of the calibra tion drift speci fica ti on of 

### :t S ppmv. The amount of excess ze r o a nd hlgh · levet dri ft m easu r ed at the 24-h our interval checks w ill 

### be recorded. 

### 3 . 3 . 2 . 7 .3 In stallation and Measu r e ment Location 

### 44 Rev . 7 . 0 

## V E $009392Eli L illy and Company Lafayette, Indiana Alte rnative Monito ring Peti tion The HC I CEMS extracts rts sa mp l e f rom the 

### Due gas stream I n the stack. Secti on 8. 1 2 of Perfoonance Speclflcation 

### 2 p rOIIides gu i dance regarding appropriate mon H or location. This measurement location i s at least 

### • 2 eq u i vale nt d u ct diameters d ownstream fr om the nea r est contro l device. po i nt of pol l utio n generation or othe r point at wh i ch a change i n the polluta nt conce ntration or em i ss i on rate may occur. • 0.5 equiva lent duct d i ameters upstrea m from 

### the effluent exha u st. 

### 3.3 . 2 . 7 . 4 Seven Day Calibration Drift Test T h e proced ure o ull i n ed in t he HC I C E MS Performance Specification (attached as ap pen dix 

### C) will be used for th i s specifi ca ti on . The specificatio n proposed for 

### the ca l ibration d rift i s 

### 5 ppmv, which Is 5% of the instrume nt spa n. Th i s i s consiste nt with 

### the e xpected drift for HCI mo n itoring us in g Fouri er Transfo r m I nfra re d Spectroscopy (FTl R ) fo und In Perform ance Specification 15 (PS15), Se ction 1 0. 1. Ills also cons i stent w llh Lilly's expe r ience with a s i m il ar monHoring system i n Ire l and , a n d wit h o the rs ' experience i n the U.S. The h ig h er ca libration d r i ft for HC I monitoring as compared to that for NO, or SO.**mo ~ori** **g** appears to be a resu lt of the react ivHy of HCI. The chem i cal's high reactivHy causes 

### rt to " s tick' to the calibra ti on cyl i nde r walls, and to be extracted u nevenly from th e cy li nder during the ca li bration process. Thus, 

### It is the calibratio n gas itself that is causing va ri ance i n 

### the calibration drift re sult s, as well as whatever drift 

### the analyze r experie n ces. 

### It 

### i s also worth n oti n g th at some other performance specl focations , such asPS 4 (for CO) do a llow a calibratio n drift o f u p to 5% of spa n . 

### 3.3 . 2 . 7 . 5 Calibration Error Te s1 T he Ca li bratio n E rror t est will follow 

### the procedures In the HCI CEMS Perfoonance Spe cificatloo (adaehed as append i x C). The Ecochem CEMS will be c h alle n ged three non-consecutive t i mes 

### wrth zero, m i d- l evel , and high-level cert ifi ed gases. The cyli n de r gases 

### will not be EPA Protocol 1 gases . The calib ration gases wiH be i njected i nto the sample system as 

### close 

### to the samp l ing probe out let as p ractical and will pass th roug h all CEMS components used during n orma l mo n itori ng. The d iffere n ce between the in strume nt respo n se and 

### the re ference value (certifie d gas) will be ca l cu l a ted afte r each i njectio n a n d the resulti ng three d i fferences will be averaged to determi n e the CE at eaCh meas urement poi nt. The calibra ti on e rror for each o f the three l evels 

# ,v; n not exceed 5% of span . 

### 3 . 3 . 2.7 . 6 System Response T i me



### 45 Rev. 7 . 0 

# VES009393Ell Ully and Company L a

f ayette, Indiana Alternative Monitoring P etition Using the Respon se Ti me Test procedure i n the HC I GEMS Performa n ce Spe cifi catio n (attached as appendix C), L i ly will determine a mean upscale and mean d ownscale system resp onse time for 

### the Ecochem (based upo n CO). 

### The s l ower o f the upscale and downscale mean response times will 

### be con sidered th e system response time. The system response time wi ll meet the requiremen t s specified i n performance specifi cation ( i .e. 

### 2 minu tes) . 3 . 3.2.7 . 7 I nterference R esponse Determination The affect of o th e r ana l ytes u pon the measurement 

### of HC I w il 

### be documented (Ecochem ca l ibration ta b le) . 3 . 3 .2. 7 . 8 Stratification Test The stratificat io n of th e gas strea m w i l l be determined using guidance in the HCI GEMS Performance Spe cifi cation (attached as append ix C). Due to the low conce n trati on of HCI expected i n the gas s t ream. strati ficatio n will be documented in te rms of velocity. A m i n i mum of 12 sampl i ng points will be u se d, with 6 sampl i ng points a l ong each o f the two traverses. The value at each traverse poin t is then compared t o the average value for a ll sa mp l ing points to determ i ne the perce nt s t ratification u s i n g the fo R owi n g equation: 

## S =J C - C 

## J * IOO% i O •Vc where: S c percent stratificatio n 

### C, = ve l ocity at sa mpling po int I**~** 

### = average ve l ocity at all samp l in g points. If the percent stratifica ti on i s less tha n or equal to 10 perce nt for any traverse poi nt, the duct Is not considered stratified at t hat location 3.3.2.7.9 Accuracy Determi n at ion The accuracy of th e HC I GEMS will 

### be de termi n ed by p e rform i ng ei th er a Re l ative Acc u racy determ i nation , or by dynam i c s piki n g. 3 . 3. 2 .7 . 9 . 1 Relative Accuracy Determination 

### 46 Rev. 7.0 

# VES009394Ell Lilly an d Company Laf ayet te , Indiana Alternative Mon it orin g Pet it ion The**proce<~ure** outli n ed I n t h e HCI CEMS Perlonnance Specificati on (atlached as appendix C) will 

### be used as a g u ide fo r th i s specificat ion . The RA of the CEMS must not be greater t h an 20% of the mean value of the reference method (RM) test data, or not greater t h an 10% i n terms of the em l ssioo sta n dard (ppmv , dry) , or h a ve an absol ute difference of l ess than 5 ppmv betwe en t he mean reference val u e and th e mean CEMS value. 3 . 3.2. 7 .9 .2 Dynamic Spiking Dynam i cally sp i king may be use d in l i e u of a Re l at ive Accuracy Test as a means to docu ment the accu racy , precision , and b i as o f the HC I C E MS . The dynamic spikin g will follow the HCI Performance Specificat i o n (attached in Appen dix C). Li n e a r regression 

### Is used to establ i s h the accuracy, preci sion, and btas of the HC I CEMS. Th e cri teri a for the HCI dyna m i c s p i king 

### is (1) The corre l ation coeffi c ient, r, must 

### be greater than or eq ua l to 0 .90 (2) The s tope must be 1.0, +/- 0 .15 (3) Th e Inte rcept must be equal to or tess than 1 5% o f the i nstrumen t span. See F i gure 6 for the Ecoche m dynamic sp i k i ng overview. 3. 3 . 2.8 Routine Operation of HCI CEMS Ongoing qua6ty assu rance wi ll fOIIoYI the CMS operation and main tenance requ i rements in 40 CFR 63 . 8(c) and the q u a l ity contro l program re quiremen ts un der 40 CFR 63.8(d). In addition, Lilly wi ll perform dai ly cal i brati on drift tes t s. quart erl y cal i bration e rro r audits (abso l ute ca li bration audit) , and annual accu racy test audits as part of O lliJ O ing qual ity assurance . 3 . 3.2.8 . 1 D a ily Calibration Drift The zero and upsca l e drift wi ll be checked once da i ly. Zero gas (0 ppm HCI) wi ll be used for the ze r o, and approximate l y 50 -100 pprnv HC I for th e upscale . 

### The calibration dri ft li ma will be 5% of the instru me nt span , or :t: 5 ppmv . Z e r o and h i gh-level cali bration drifts sha ll 

### be adjusted, a t a mini m um , whenever the 24- hour zero drift exceeds the limits of the ca li bration dri ft specification of :t:S ppmv . The amo u nt o f excess zero and hi g h-level drift measured at the 24-hou r i nterva l checks will be recorded . T h e HCI CEMS will be deemed ou t of control when e ither the zero or upsca l e d r ift exceeds 2x the performance specification. See Secti on 3.3.2 .9. 3.3. 2.8 . 2 Q ua rterly Abso l ute Calibration Audit ( Cali bration Erro r T est) The Cal i bra tion Error test will follow the procedures in th e HCI CEMS Performa n ce Specification (attached as**appendi~** 

### C). The Eoochem CEMS will 

### be challenged t hree non-consecutive times with zero , mid-leve l , a nd h i gh- l evel certified gases . The cyli n der gases will 

### be certif i ed gases (E PA Protoco l 1 

### 47 Rev . 7 .0 

# VES009395Eli Ull y and Company Laf ayette, In d ia na A l ternative Monitoring Petition gases are not ava il able for HCI) . 

### The catibrat ion gases wi ll be i nje cted i nto the sample system as c l ose 

### to the sampl i ng probe ou tl et as practical and will pass through a ll CEMS compone n ts used d uring normal mon n oring . The difference betwee n the i nstrument response and the r eference va l ue (certified gas) will be ca l c ul ated after each i njection and the resulting three differences will be averaged 

### to determine the CE at 

### each measurement po i nt. The cafibratio n error for each of the three le vels 

### will not exceed 5% of span. An absol u te calibration audit will be perfo r med quarterly , except d uri ng the quarter the ann u al accu racy i s performed . 3. 3.2.8 . 3 Annual A ccu racy Test Au d it The accuracy 

### of th e HCI CEMS will be determined by performing enher a Re l ative Accuracy dete r minatio n, or by dynamic Sp i king. 

### The location of the samp l e p robe 

### will be verified. 3.3. 2. 8 . 3 .1 Seven D ay D rift T est P r i or to th e start of the accu racy test (either t he Rela ti ve Accuracy Determ i nation or Dyn a m ic Sp;king) you must perfo r m a ca l ibration drift test for a period o f at l east seven daY$. The seven -d ay ca l i bratio n drift test must be conducted When the faCil i ty i s unde r norma l operat i ons . During the ca l ibrati on d rift test period you must determine th e magnitude of 

### the zero calibratio n drift and the upsca l e calibration drift at l east once each day. During the stability tests no adjustments or catib rati o n s may be made to th e CEMS. If pe r i odic automat i c or ma n ual adj ustme nts are made to 

### the CEMS zero and cal i bratio n sett i ngs, conduct th e CD test immediat ely b efore 

### these adjustments , o r cond u ct it i n such a way that the CD can be de term i ned. The zero a n d upsca l e drift each must be less tha n 5% of the Instrument spa n each day for seven consecutive daY$.

3.3.2 . 8.3 .2 Re lati ve Accura cy Det erm i nation The procedure outline d i n the HCI CEMS Perfo rm ance Spe c ificati on (attached as appendix C) will be used as a gu i de for this specification. The RA of t h e CEMS must n ot be greater tha n 20% 

### of t h e mean value of the refe rence method (RM) te st data, or not greater t h an 1 0% in terms of the emissio n standard (ppmv, dry) , or have an absol ut e difference of less than 5 ppmv between the mea n reference va l ue and the mean CEMS value. 3. 3.2 . 8.3.3 Dyn a mic Spi king



### 48 Rev. 7.0 

# VES009396Eli L il ly and Company Laf ayalla , Indi ana Alternative Monitoring Pet ition Dynamically sp i king may 

### be used i n lieu of a Re l ative Acc u racy Test as a mea ns to documen t the accuracy, precision, and bias of the HG I GEMS . T he dynamic sp i ki ng will fo l low th e HG I C E MS P erforma nce Specifi cat i on (attached in Appendix C) . Linea r regression 

### is u s ed to estabtish th e accuracy , precis i on, and bias of the HGI GEMS . Th e cri teria for tha HG I dyn am i c sp i king are: (1) The oorrelat i on coefficient (r) must 

### be g reater than or eq u al to 0.90 , (2) Tha s lope m u st 

### be 1 .0 , 

### +/ - 0.15, (3) Tha I ntercept must 

### be eq ua l to or l ess than 1 5 % of the Instrument s pan. 

### See Rgure 6 for the Ecoche m dynam i c spikin g oveiV i ew. 3 . 3 .2. 9 Out Of Control O ut of contro l determi n ations 

### will fo llow 40 CF R 63.8(c)(7). SpecifiCally, tha HG I CEMS will 

### be considered o ut of contro l if t he zero (low · leve l ) or hig h leve l ca l ibratio n drift exoeeds 

### two times th e app l icable callbration d ri ft specifi cation ( i. e. th e calibrati on drift is greate r tha n ± 10 pprnv.) In addition, 

### the HC I GEMS will also 

### be cons i dered out o f control 

### if the GEMS fai l s the accuracy test**~** or abso l ute ca l ibrati on audi t Wh e n 

### the HC I CE MS 

### is out of con trol , Li ll y will take th e necessary corrective act i on and sha ll repeat a ll necessa ry tests which in d i cate that the system is ou t o f contro l. L m y will ta ke oorrective a ction a n d conduct retesting until the performance requ i re men t s are below the applicab l e lim i ts. The beg inn ing of the out of co ntrol p eriod is th e h o ur Lilly cond u cts a perfonnance check tha t i ndi cates an exceedance o f t ha performance requ i rem e nts. T ha end of tha out o f con trol period will 

### be the ho ur fol l owing the com pletion of corrective act i on a n d successful demonst ration that the system i s wit hi n the allowable**lim~ .**  W h e n the i nci nerator i s operat i ng in parametri c m ode, th e HCI GEMS will not be deemed o u t of control. 3.3 . 3 Use of HC I CEMS for Demonstrating Cont i nuous Co mp l iance with 

### the HCIIC I 2 HWC MACT E mi s sion Standard Li lly m ay beg i n using the Ecocham C E MS to demonstrat e cont i nuo u s compliance**w~** the HWC MAGT**HCIIC~** emiss i on standard on l y after tha fol l owing i s ach i eved: • A success ful Performance Specification Test is performed fo l lowi ng EPA' s app roval of th i s Alternative Mo n itori ng Pet iti on. • A mod ifi cation to th e TI U e 

## v perm it Is approved which establ i shes monitoring requ i reme nts based o n 

### the resu lts of the approved AMP. Fol lowi ng comp l et i on of tha above, on - go i ng qu ali ty assurance wHI 

### be pe rf ormed on the Ecochem CEMS as specified i n Section 3.3.2 . 8 of this document. 

### 49 Rev . 7 .0 

# V

ES009397E ll L ill y and Comp an y L a f ayette, Ind i ana A lt e rnative Monitorin g Pet ltl o n 3 .3 . 4 Mon i tori n g Fre quen cy an d A ve ra gi n g T i me The Ecochem CEMS wi ll monitor and record a n HC I concentrati on at leas t once every 

### 15 seconds. A one m i nu te ave rage wi ll be calcu l a t ed from the fo u r 

### 1 5 second meas u rem e nts d u ring the m i n u te as shown I n the following equation: 

### OMA 

### = 4 

### + Cl 2 where: O M A 

# = HC II C l 2 o n e-min u te average va l ue (ppmvd ) Ci 

## = HC I fiftee n seco n d observation from the CE M S analyzer (ppmvd) C l 2 

## = C h lori n e gas default va l ue ( 1 ppmvd), The 

### twelve h ou r rolli n g average w i ll 

### be calc ul ated based on t he averag e of the 

### 7 20 most r ece n t val i d onem i nute a verages as s h own i n the fol l owi n g equation:

Where: 

# ,,. 

# L OMA 

## THRA I • 

### 720

THRA 

### = Twelve hour roll i n g average val u e {pp m vd) OMA 

### = One m i n u te average val u e (ppmvd) T he twelve h o u r ro ili ng average wi ll 

### be updated every m i nute when 

## a new one m in u te ave r age 

### is ca . lculated. T he HC I/ C1 2 stad< con ce nllatio n will b e cor r ected to 7% o x ygen by the follow i ng eq u ation: 

## 2 1 - 7 HCI ,.,, = HCI ,"""" . 

# * --- 21 - 0 2

50 Rev. 7.0 

# VES 0 0 9 398El i Lilly and Company Lafayette , I ndiana Alternative Monnori n g Petnio n where: HCI"" 

### = HCVC I , conce ntra tio n , ex pressed as HC I corrected to 7% oxygen (ppmvd) HCI..., .. , 

## = HCI/C I 1 stack gas co ncentration. expresse d as HC I (p pmvd) 0 2 

### = Oxygen stack gas percen t (vo l % dry)

3 . 3.4.1 Rolling Average Cal<:ulations during HC I CEMS Daily Calibration and Ongoing Quality Assurance Audits The E cochem CEMS w iU be o ff - li ne for up to an hou r , daily, to perform the daily qua l ity assurance . Hazardo us waste will co nti nue to be bu rned while perform i n g th e zero a n d upscale d rift checks f or t h e Ecochem CEMS (CO , 0 2, HCI) . This is i n l i eu of the 

### 20 minu tes per day provided for i n the append i x to su bpart EEE of part 63 (section 6.2 of the appe n dix). Rolling average calculations will be frozen whi l e 

### U lly performs the daily spa n drift check an d zero dri ft c h eck w h ile co ntinu ing to bu m hazardo u s waste, un l ess a red un dant HCI measuremen t system is available. 

### The rol li n g average ca l cu l atio n s will be froz en for a period not to e xceed one hour whl l e burnin g hazardous wast e for the da il y calibrati on test. This hou r incl u des the time needed to cal i brate the Ecochem system for ail measu r ed pa rameters (HC I , CO , 

### 0 2 , SO, a nd NO,). RoPi n g average calculati o n s w l il resume o n ce the spa n drift 

### check and zero drift check have been performed . T h e twelve-ho ur rolling average ca l culation s wi l l re s ume by addi n g t he 

### first val i d o ne-m i nute average after th e drift ch eck to th e previous 719 one m i nute 

### average va l ues. I n add it i on. rol li ng averag e ca l cu l at ion s wi ll also be fro zen wh i l e the quartetl y absol ute calibrati on audn I s conducted . Rol li ng 

### average cal<:ula li o ns w i ll resume once the tests have been completed. The one- h our rolling averag e cal<:u l ations will resume by add ing the first va lid o n e-min u te 

### averag e to the pr evi ou s 59 one m i nute average va l ues. Th e twelve - h ou r rolling average calculations wi ll res u me by adding the firs t valid o ne- m i nute average to the previous 719 one m i nute average valu es. 3 . 3.4 . 2 Roll i ng Average Ca l culations during System Autopurge Th e Ecochem CEMS may be purged au t omatically once pe r day w h ile hazardous waste i s b eing burne d. P urging i nvo lves d i re cting compressed a i r throug h the p robe i nt o the s tack for a s h ot! period of li me to p r even t bu ildup of so l ids i n t he probe . The purge period wi ll last a pp roximately 5 m i nutes. Purging t he stack probe I s necessary for preventive mainte n ance rea so n s and i s recomme n ded by the CEMS ma n ufacture r due to the types of wastes b urned in the s o l id l iqu id i ncinerati on system.



### 5 1 Rev . 

### 7 . 0 

# VES009 399