alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 928 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 928

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the income 
 limitation applicable to heads of household for purposes of the Hope 
 and Lifetime Learning credits and the interest deduction on education 
                                 loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2001

  Ms. Rivers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the income 
 limitation applicable to heads of household for purposes of the Hope 
 and Lifetime Learning credits and the interest deduction on education 
                                 loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN INCOME LIMITATION APPLICABLE TO HEADS OF 
              HOUSEHOLD FOR PURPOSES OF THE HOPE AND LIFETIME LEARNING 
              CREDITS AND INTEREST DEDUCTION ON EDUCATION LOANS.

    (a) Hope and Lifetime Learning Credits.--
            (1) Increase in limits.--Paragraph (2) of section 25A(d) of 
        the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A)(ii) by inserting ``and 
                $60,000 in the case of a head of household'' after 
                ``joint return'', and
                    (B) in subparagraph (B) by inserting ``and $15,000 
                in the case of a head of household'' after ``joint 
                return''.
            (2) Adjustment for inflation.--Subparagraph (A) of section 
        25A(h)(2) of such Code is amended by inserting ``, $60,000,'' 
        after ``$40,000''.
    (b) Interest on Education Loans.--
            (1) Increase in limits.--Clause (II) of section 
        221(b)(2)(B)(i) of such Code is amended by inserting ``and 
        $50,000 in the case of a head of household'' after ``joint 
        return''.
            (2) Adjustment for inflation.--Paragraph (1) of section 
        221(g) of such Code is amended by inserting ``, $50,000,'' 
        after ``$40,000''.
    (c) Effective Dates.--
            (1) Hope and lifetime learning credits.--The amendments 
        made by subsection (a) shall apply to expenses paid after 
        December 31, 2000 (in tax years ending after such date), for 
        education furnished in academic periods beginning after such 
        date.
            (2) Interest on education loans.--The amendments made by 
        subsection (b) shall apply to interest payments due and paid 
        after December 31, 2000, on any qualified education loan.
                                 <all>
```
§ 25.535 Effect of state or local law or other requirements. ( a ) *Prohibitory requirements.* The obligation to comply with §§ 25.500 through 25.550 is not obviated or alleviated by the existence of any State or local law or other requirement that imposes prohibitions or limits upon employment of members of one sex that are not imposed upon members of the other sex.
( b ) *Benefits.* A recipient that provides any compensation, service, or benefit to members of one sex pursuant to a State or local law or other requirement shall provide the same compensation, service, or benefit to members of the other sex.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LYNN M. DAVIS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

ANDREW M. SAUL * , Commissioner of

Social Security Administration

,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 18

- 55077

D.C. No. 2:16

- cv

- 03974

- AB

- KS

MEMORANDUM * *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Andre Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 3, 2020 * * *

Before: MURGUIA, CHRISTEN, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Lynn M. Davis appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in

* Andrew M. Saul has been substituted for his predecessor, Nancy A.

Berryhill, as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration under Fed. R.

App. P. 43(c)(2).

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as pr ovided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 18

- 55077

her action alleging federal employment claims . We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles

, 349 F.3d

634, 639 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Davis’s retaliation

claim because Davis failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether

defendant’s legitimate

, nondiscriminatory reasons for terminating Davis’s

employment were prete xtual. See Surrell v. Cal. Water Serv. Co

., 518 F.3d 1097,

1108 (9th Cir. 2008) (elements of a retaliation claim under Title VII ); Stegall v.

Citadel Broad. Co.

, 350 F.3d 1061, 1066, 1069

- 70 (9th Cir. 2004) (circumstantial

evidence of pretext must be specific and substantial).

The district court properly upheld the Merit Systems Protection Board’s

(“ MSPB ”) decision affirming the terminat ion of Davis’s employment because the

M SP B’s findings were supported by substantial evidence

. See Washington v.

Garrett

, 10 F.3d 1421, 1428 (9th Cir. 1994) (deferential standard of review for

MSPB decision regarding validity of personnel actio n ).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Davis’s motion for

reconsideration because Davis failed to establish any basis for such relief. See Sch.

Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc

., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262

- 63 (9th Cir.3 18

- 55077

1993) (setting forth standard of review and grounds for reconsideration under Fed.

R. Civ. P. 60 ( b ) ).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the fir st time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Davis’s pending motion to extend time to file a reply brief (Docket Entry

No. 30) is denied.

AFFIRMED.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0931.html[7/21/2015 6:24:50 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-mrc3

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0931

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jerry Paquette

General Comment

Hi my name is Jerry Paquette ...i am smart enough to plan my own retirement and the Fed Government needs to

 understand this and keep the borders safe for us to use our retirement in the way i or the rest of the retiring

 public do so. The fed Government is getting to big and greedy. 

Thank you

Jerry.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DERICK DURANT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1225

[May 7, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Gary L. Sweet, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562016CF00683.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Timothy Wang, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina JimenezOrosa, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., and LEVENSON, JEFFREY R., Associate Judge, 

concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0749.html[7/21/2015 11:31:27 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-4bqz

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0749

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Andrew Roberts

General Comment

leave the people of this country alone. people have been planning their retirements fine for decades. keep your

 noses out of people's individual private matters. defend the country, maintain our infrastructure and everything

 else, back the heck off. government of the people, by the people, for the people. not for your own selfish

 purposes.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7027** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. OSCAR HERNANDEZ , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville
. Richard L. Voorhees , District Judge. ( 5:08

- cr - 00027

- RLV

- DCK

- 4 ; 5:12

- cv 00194

- RLV )

Submitted : November 21, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014

Before KING and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Oscar Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this cir cuit.2 PER CURIAM: Oscar Hernandez seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)( 1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the distr ict court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We ha ve independently reviewed the record and conclude
that Hernandez has not made the requisite showing. ∗ Accordingly,

∗ Although the district court failed to give Hernandez notice under Roseboro v. Garrison , 528 F.3d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), our certificate of appealability assessment convinces us that this omission was harmless.3 we deny the motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal co ntentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLunar articulated remote transportation systemA first generation lunar transportation vehicle was designed for use on the surface of the Moon between the years 2010 and 2020. Attention is focussed on specific design details on all components of the Lunar Articulated Remote Transportation System (Lunar ARTS). The Lunar ARTS will be a three cart, six-wheeled articulated vehicle. It's purpose will be for the transportation of astronauts and/or materials for excavation purposes at a short distance from the base (37.5 kilometers). The power system includes fuel cells for both the primary system and the back-up system. The vehicle has the option of being operated in a manned or unmanned mode. The unmanned mode includes stereo imaging with signal processing for navigation. For manned missions the display console is a digital readout displayed on the inside of the asronaut's helmet. A microprocessor is also on board the vehicle. Other components of the vehicle include: a double wishbone/flexible hemispherical wheel suspension; chassis; a steering system; motors; seat restraints, heat rejection systems; solar flare protection; dust protection; and meteoroid protection. A one-quarter scale dynamic model was built to study the dynamic behavior of the vehicle. The dynamic model closely captures the mechanical and electrical details of the total design.Document ID19900017016Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBeech, Geoffrey*(Florida State Univ. Tallahassee, FL, United States)*Conley, Gerald*(Florida State Univ. Tallahassee, FL, United States)*Diaz, Claudine*(Florida State Univ. Tallahassee, FL, United States)*Dimella, Timothy*(Florida State Univ. Tallahassee, FL, United States)*Dodson, Pete*(Florida State Univ. Tallahassee, FL, United States)*Hykin, Jeff*(Florida State Univ. Tallahassee, FL, United States)*Richards, Byron*(Florida State Univ. Tallahassee, FL, United States)*Richardson, Kroy*(Florida State Univ. Tallahassee, FL, United States)*Shetzer, Christie*(Florida State Univ. Tallahassee, FL, United States)*Vandyke, Melissa*(Florida State Univ. Tallahassee, FL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1990Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186817-VOL-1NAS 1.26:186817-VOL-1Accession Number90N26332Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NGT-21-002-800Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017016.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 OMEGA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 9, 2006
    
    /s/ Daniel L. WarfelDaniel L. WarfelChief Financial Officer  Page 42
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 112 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                           May 1, 2001.
Whereas the 4-H Youth Development Program celebrates its 100th anniversary in 
        2002;
Whereas the 4-H Youth Development program sponsors clubs in rural and urban 
        areas throughout the world;
Whereas the 4-H Clubs have grown to over 5.6 million annual participants ranging 
        from 5 to 19 years of age;
Whereas today's 4-H Clubs are very diverse, offering agricultural, career 
        development, information technology, and general life skills programs; 
        and
Whereas the 4-H Youth Development Program continues to make great contributions 
        toward the development of well-rounded youth: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the upcoming 100th 
anniversary of the 4-H Youth Development Program and commends such program for 
service to the youth of the world.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Prion Transmission and Detection.                    

*Date:*                         October 3, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B Rockledge Drive, 3253, Bethesda, MD 20817. (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Darren D. Sledjeski, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, NIH/NIAID/DHHS, Scientific Review Program, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC-7616, Room 3131, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2638,                         *sledjeskid@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: August 30, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-4391 Filed 9-7-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 382.101 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to establish programs designed to help prevent accidents and injuries resulting from the misuse of alcohol or use of controlled substances by drivers of commercial motor vehicles.
§ 31.27 Computation of time. ( a ) In computing any period of time under this part or in an order issued thereunder, the time begins with the day following the act, event, or default, and includes the last day of the period, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday observed by the Federal government, in which event it includes the next business day.
( b ) When the period of time allowed is less than seven days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays observed by the Federal government shall be excluded from the computation.
( c ) Where a document has been served or issued by placing it in the United States mail, an additional five days will be added to the time permitted for any responses.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.38

                 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO DEALERTRACK HOLDINGS, INC.

                             2001 STOCK OPTION PLAN

         1.     Definitions. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise
defined shall have the meanings set forth in the DealerTrack Holdings, Inc. 2001
Stock Option Plan, as amended (the "Plan").

         2.     Exercisability of Options. Section 7(a)(i) of the Plan is hereby
amended by changing the Lock-Up Period for Options granted under the Plan
following the Company's IPO in the first sentence of such Section 7(a)(i) from
"the 180-day period immediately following the effective date of such
registration statement" to "the 90-day period immediately following the
effective date of such registration statement."
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 94 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 94

    To provide Capitol-flown flags to the families of deceased law 
                         enforcement officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

Mr. Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide Capitol-flown flags to the families of deceased law 
                         enforcement officers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Law Enforcement Officers Flag 
Memorial Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. CAPITOL-FLOWN FLAGS FOR FAMILIES OF DECEASED LAW ENFORCEMENT 
              OFFICERS.

    (a) Authority.--
            (1) In general.--The family of a deceased law enforcement 
        officer may request, and the Attorney General shall provide to 
        such family, a Capitol-flown flag, which shall be supplied to 
        the Attorney General by the Architect of the Capitol. The 
        family shall pay the cost of such flag, including shipping.
            (2) Effective date.--Paragraph (1) shall take effect on the 
        date on which the Attorney General establishes the procedure 
        required by subsection (b).
    (b) Procedure.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Attorney General shall establish a procedure 
(including any appropriate forms) by which the family of a deceased law 
enforcement officer may request, and provide sufficient information to 
determine such officer's eligibility for, a Capitol-flown flag.
    (c) Applicability.--This Act shall only apply to a deceased law 
enforcement officer who died on or after the date of enactment of this 
Act.
    (d) Definitions.--In this Act--
            (1) the term ``Capitol-flown flag'' means a United States 
        flag flown over the United States Capitol in honor of the 
        deceased law enforcement officer for whom such flag is 
        requested; and
            (2) the term ``deceased law enforcement officer'' means a 
        person who was charged with protecting public safety, who was 
        authorized to make arrests by a Federal, State, or local law 
        enforcement agency, and who died while employed by such an 
        agency or after retiring in good standing from such an agency.
                                 <all>
```