alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0686.html[7/21/2015 8:34:34 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-vff9

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0686

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Todd Osborne

Address:

5513 Great Divide Dr.

Bee Cave, TX, 78738

Email: todd.osborne@ericsson.com

Phone: 512-542-4087

General Comment

I do not want the government deciding how/what/why I spend my retirement once I meet the retirement

 requirements. Please refrain from violating the Constitution of the United Stated of America by redefining how

 401K money is spent by the individual citizens of the United Stated of America.
Order entered July 3, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00987-CR

CHARLES EDWARD WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-54675-K

ORDER

The Court GRANTS the June 27, 2013 request of the Dallas County District Clerk for an 

extension of time to file the supplemental clerk’s record in this appeal. 

We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the 

date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs 

assessed in the case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court appointed 

attorney fees. In accordance with Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 103.001, the cost 

bill shall be signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive 

payment for the cost. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a 

document explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court 

appointed attorney fee.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, 

Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Fireplace NSPS Increm

Cost Effectiveness

Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association Fireplace C
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1067

ANDREWS BARTLETT & ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED,

now known as GES Exposition Services,

Incorporated,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEMS PHARMACISTS, INCORPORATED (ASHP), formerly known as

American Society of Hospital Pharmacists,

Incorporated,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 97-1068

ANDREWS BARTLETT & ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED,

now known as GES Exposition Services,

Incorporated,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEMS PHARMACISTS, INCORPORATED (ASHP), formerly known as

American Society of Hospital Pharmacists,

Incorporated,

Defendant - Appellee.
2

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge.

(CA-95-2671-K)

Argued: October 2, 1997 Decided: November 12, 1997

Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge, and

MAGILL, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals

for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ARGUED: Julie Hions O'Kane, DRAGE, deBEAUBIEN, KNIGHT, SIMMONS,

ROMANO & NEAL, Orlando, Florida, for Appellant. Jeffrey Moore

Johnson, DICKSTEIN, SHAPIRO, MORIN & OSHINSKY, L.L.P., Washington,

D.C., for Appellee. ON BRIEF: David H. Simmons, DRAGE, deBEAUBIEN,

KNIGHT, SIMMONS, ROMANO & NEAL, Orlando, Florida, for Appellant.

Julia A. Bronson, DICKSTEIN, SHAPIRO, MORIN & OSHINSKY, L.L.P.,

Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

This case arises out of a dispute between the plaintiffappellant, Andrews Bartlett & Associates, Inc., and the defendantappellee, American Society of Health-Systems Pharmacists, Inc.

(ASHP). The two parties had an extended contractual relationship

during which Andrews Bartlett produced conventions and meetings for

ASHP. In 1994 ASHP ended this relationship under a termination

clause in the most recent contract. Andrews Bartlett sued ASHP,

and the district court held (1) that the termination clause

unambiguously granted ASHP the right to end the contract if it was

dissatisfied with Andrews Bartlett's performance and (2) that there

was sufficient uncontroverted evidence of that dissatisfaction to

merit summary judgment for ASHP. Andrews Bartlett appeals, and we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Andrews

Bartlett & Associates, Inc. v. American Society of Health-Systems

Pharmacists, Inc., Civil Action No. K-95-2671 (D. Md. Nov. 25,

1996).

AFFIRMED
#### § 241.17 Preemptive effect.

Under 49 U.S.C. 20106, the regulations in this part preempt any State law, regulation, or order covering the same subject matter, except an additional or more stringent law, regulation, or order that is necessary to eliminate or reduce an essentially local safety hazard; is not incompatible with a law, regulation, or order of the United States Government; and does not impose an unreasonable burden on interstate commerce.
|   | **Exhibit 32.2** |
|--------|------------------|

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THTE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of AmBase Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Ferrara, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act            of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: March 27, 2009 |
|----------------------|

|   | /s/ John P. Ferrara­­­ |
|--------|------------------------------------|

                                                            John P. Ferrara

                                                                                                                    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

|   | AmBase Corporation |
|--------|--------------------|
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 878

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the exclusion from

gross income for damage awards for emotional distress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 2001

Mr. FRANK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore

the exclusion from gross income for damage awards for

emotional distress.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF EXCLUSION FROM GROSS IN4 COME FOR DAMAGE AWARDS FOR EMO5 TIONAL DISTRESS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 104 of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to compensa8 tion for injuries or sickness) is amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘physical’’ each place it appears

10 in paragraph (2), and
2

•HR 878 IH

1 (2) by striking the last 2 sentences and insert2 ing the following new sentence: ‘‘For purposes of

3 paragraph (2), the term ‘personal injuries or sick4 ness’ includes emotional distress.’’

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

6 subsection (a) shall apply to amounts received after De7 cember 31, 2000, in taxable years ending after such date.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
EnergyNorth, Inc. condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1997
and the condensed consolidated statement of income and statement of cash flows
for the three months ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      100,944<F1>
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      7,615<F2>
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          29,508
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         9,607
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,674
<COMMON>                                         3,246
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       30,488
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             17,154
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  50,888
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            45,217
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               2,550
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      925
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  48,094
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  147,674
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       30,892
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,425
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      23,666
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      26,091
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          4,801
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 512
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   5,313
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,171
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,142
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    4,142
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         1,039
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,600<F3>
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                            (69)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Net of accumulated depreciation of $48,960
<F2>Net of accumulated depreciation of $ 9,675
<F3>$3,600 represents the forecasted annual interest on bonds for the fiscal
    year ending September 30, 1998.  Actual interest on bonds for the three 
    months ended December 31, 1997 was $905.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 4, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00768

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.H.D

. , a Child

From the 150th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- CI

- 14326

Honorable David A. Canales , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with the court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

It is so ORDERED on December 4, 2019

.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 4th day of December, 2019

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF PAULSON CAPITAL CORP. AND
SUBSIDIARY AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND CASH FLOWS FOR
THE NINE MONTHS IN THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                       151
<RECEIVABLES>                                              2,747
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                            0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                          0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                       10,629
<PP&E>                                                       125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            14,508
<SHORT-TERM>                                                 100
<PAYABLES>                                                 4,698
<REPOS-SOLD>                                                   0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                            0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                           414
<LONG-TERM>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                     515
<OTHER-SE>                                                 8,781
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              14,508
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                          1,218
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                                           6
<COMMISSIONS>                                              9,208
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                              2,875
<FEE-REVENUE>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             6
<COMPENSATION>                                             9,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            7,719
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                                 7,719
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                               4,631
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               1.09
        

</TABLE>
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0616.html[7/21/2015 7:17:47 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-lek2

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0616

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Denny Muller

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan my own retirement. Leave us alone.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Lillian V. Rourke, Appellant, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against Herman A. Metz, as Comptroller of the City of New York. Bernard J. Malone, Respondent.

*Matter of Rourke*v. *Metz,*139 App. Div. 155, affirmed.

(Argued May 29, 1911;

decided June 13, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 13, 1910, which affirmed an order of Special Term determining title to certain awards made in condemnation proceedings.

*Stephen M. Hoye*for appellant.

*Matthew J. Wheelehan*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ.
§ 372.109 Computation of tonnage allowable in nonfarm-non-member transportation. Interstate transportation performed by a cooperative association or federation of cooperative associations for nonmembers who are not farmers, cooperative associations, or federations of associations or the United States Government for compensation, (except transportation otherwise exempt under subtitle IV, part B, chapter 135 of title 49 of the United States Code) shall be limited to that which is incidental to its primary transportation operation and necessary for its effective performance. It shall in no event exceed 25 percent of its total interstate transportation services in any fiscal year, measured in terms of tonnage. A cooperative association or federation of cooperative associations may transport its own property, its members' property, property of other farmers and the property of other cooperatives or federations in accordance with existing law, except where the provisions of § 372.111 may be applicable to the limit on member/nonmember transportation. ( a ) The phrase “incidental to its primary transportation operation and necessary for its effective performance” means that the interstate transportation of the cooperative association or federation of cooperative associations for nonmembers as described above is performed with the same trucks or tractors employed in a prior or subsequent trip in the primary transportation operation of the cooperative association or federation, that it is not economically feasible to operate the trucks or tractors empty on return trips (outbound trips in cases where the primary transportation operation is inbound to the association or federation), and that the additional income obtained from such transportation is necessary to make the primary transportation operation financially practicable. Transportation for nonmembers as described above performed by a cooperative or federation through the use of trucks or tractors trip-leased for one-way movements with the cooperative association or federation acting as leasee, is not incidental and necessary;
( b ) The base tonnage to which the 25-percent limitation is applied is all tonnage of all kinds transported by the cooperative association or federation of cooperative associations in interstate or foreign commerce, whether for itself, its members or nonmembers, for or on behalf of the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof, and that performed within the exemption provided by 49 U.S.C. 13506(a)(5).
[43 FR 2397, Jan. 17, 1978, as amended at 43 FR 21894, May 22, 1978; 45 FR 45524, July 3, 1980; 62 FR 49940, Sept. 24, 1997; 66 FR 49870, Oct. 1, 2001; 78 FR 58478, Sept. 24, 2013]
§ 371.7 Misrepresentation. ( a ) A broker shall not perform or offer to perform any brokerage service (including advertising), in any name other than that in which its registration is issued.
( b ) A broker shall not, directly or indirectly, represent its operations to be that of a carrier. Any advertising shall show the broker status of the operation.
[45 FR 68942, Oct. 17, 1980. Redesignated at 61 FR 54707, Oct. 21, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 15421, Apr. 1, 1997]
§ 260.17 Credit risk premium analysis. ( a ) When Federal appropriations are not available to cover the total subsidy cost, the Administrator will determine the Credit Risk Premium necessary for each direct loan or loan guarantee by estimating the credit risk and the potential recovery in the event of a default of each project evaluating the factors described in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) Establishing the credit risk. ( 1 ) Where an Applicant has received a recent credit rating from one or more nationally recognized rating agencies, that rating will be used to estimate the credit risk.
( 2 ) Where an Applicant has not received a credit rating from a credit rating agency, the Administrator will determine the credit risk based on an evaluation of the following factors: ( i ) Business risk, based on Applicant's: ( A ) Industry outlook;
( B ) Market position;
( C ) Management and financial policies;
( D ) Capital expenditures; and
( E ) Operating efficiency.
( ii ) Financial risk, based on Applicant?s past and projected: ( A ) Profitability;
( B ) Liquidity;
( C ) Financial strength;
( D ) Size; and
( E ) Level of capital expenditures; and
( iii ) Project risk, based on the proposed project's: ( A ) Potential for improving revenues, profitability and cash flow from operations; and
( B ) Reliance on third parties for success.
( c ) The potential recovery in the event of a default will be based on: ( 1 ) The nature of the Applicant's assets; and
( 2 ) Liquidation value of the collateral offered, including the terms and conditions of the lien securing the collateral.
( d ) ( 1 ) Where the Credit Risk Premium determined pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section is a positive amount, the interest rate on the direct loan will be equal to not less than the rate set pursuant to § 260.9 plus an interest rate adjustment sufficient to result in a Credit Risk Premium of zero dollars.
( 2 ) Paragraph (d)(1) of this section shall apply to a direct loan or loan guarantee only so long as the Act requires the Secretary to return Credit Risk Premiums paid on that loan or loan guarantee to the original source.
[65 FR 41841, July 6, 2000, as amended at 89 FR 45776, May 24, 2024]
#### Ralph Hoke, *Respondent, v.*Mary Jane Waldorf and another, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Board-man, J.;

Bockes, J., not acting.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, October 19, 1995 (131), Para 131.4 Communications]
[Page 1553]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.131.4  communications

  Executive and other communications, pursuant to clause 2, rule XXIV, 
were referred as follows:

       1538. A letter from the Secretary of Energy, transmitting 
     the Department's eighth annual report to Congress summarizing 
     the Department's progress during fiscal year 1994 in 
     implementing the requirements of the Comprehensive 
     Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 
     pursuant to Public Law 99-499, section 120(e)(5) (100 Stat. 
     1669); to the Committee on Commerce.
       1539. A letter from the Acting Director, Defense Security 
     Assistance Agency, transmitting notification concerning the 
     Department of the Army's proposed Letter(s) of Offer and 
     Acceptance [LOA] to Italy for defense articles and services 
     (Transmittal No. 96-04), pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 2776(b); to 
     the Committee on International Relations.
       1540. A letter from the Administrator, Environmental 
     Protection Agency, transmitting the Agency's annual report 
     summarizing actions taken under the Program Fraud Civil 
     Remedies Act [PFCRA] for the year ending September 30, 1995, 
     pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3801-3812; to the Committee on 
     Government Reform and Oversight.
       1541. A letter from the Administrator, General Services 
     Administration, transmitting a draft of proposed legislation 
     to amend title 31, United States Code, to require executive 
     agencies to verify for correctness of transportation charges 
     prior to payment, and for other purposes; to the Committee on 
     Government Reform and Oversight.
```