alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 No. 06

- 15

- 00109

- CR
IN The Sixth Court of Appeals Texarkana , Texas

BRIAN LYNN PUCKETT , Appellant,

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

MOTION TO WITHDRAW PURSUANT TO ANDERS v. CALIFORNIA,

386 U.S. 738 (1967)

TO THE HONORABLE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS:
NOW COMES JEFF T. JACKSON, counsel for Appellant

Brian Lynn Puckett , and hereby moves to withdraw from
representation of Appellant pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). In support of this
motion, counsel shows as follows:

I.
Counsel has thoroughly reviewed the record on appeal,
and, for these reasons, is thoroughly familiar with the

case.2 II.
Counsel has, in the exercise of his professional
judgment, determined that the instant case presents no

non - frivolous is sues for appeal, and, in accordance with
the Supreme Court’s decision in Anders v. California , 386
U.S. 738 (1967), now so advise s the court and requests
permission to withdraw. Anders , id . at 744.

III.

In accordance with Anders , counsel has,
contemporaneously with this motion, filed a brief
outlining all issues which might arguably support an
appeal and explaining why those issues are meritless.

Anders , Id

.
IV.
Counsel has furnished the appellant with a copy of
said brief, a copy of this motion, and a letter apprising

A ppe llant of counsel’s actions and Appellant ’ s rights
regarding these matters

.3 V.
Having determined that the instant appeal is wholly
frivolous, and having complied with the briefing and
notice requirements of Anders v. California , counsel now
requests that h e be allowed to withdraw, pursuant to

Anders

.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, it is prayed that
the Court grant counsel’s request and allow counsel to
withdraw from this case, pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Respectfully submitted, 

### /s/ Jeff T. Jackson

Jeff T. Jackson SBOT No. 24069976 736

- A Hwy 259 N. Kilgore, TX 75662
Phone: 903

- 654

- 3362
Fax: 817

- 887

- 4333 Attorney for Appellant, Brian Lynn Puckett4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to T EX . R. A PP . P . 9.5, I certify that on
September 2 nd , 2015, a copy of this motion was mailed via
first class U.S. mail, postage prepaid, to the following:

Van Colson Brown BRIAN LYNN PUCKETT Gregg County District Attorney TDCJ No. 02001172 SBOT No. 03205900 Bradshaw State Jail 101 E. Methvin, Ste. 333 P.O. Box 9000 Longview, TX 75601 Henderson, TX 75653



### /s/ Jeff T. Jackson Jeff T. Jackson
§ 236.311 Signal control circuits, selection through track relays or devices functioning as track relays and through signal mechanism contacts and time releases at automatic interlocking. ( a ) The control circuits for aspects with indications more favorable than “proceed at restricted speed” shall be selected through track relays, or through devices that function as track relays, for all track circuits in the route governed.
( b ) At automatic interlocking, signal control circuits shall be selected ( 1 ) through track relays, or devices that function as track relays, for all track circuits in the route governed and in all conflicting routes within the interlocking;
( 2 ) through signal mechanism contacts or relay contacts closed when signals for such conflicting routes display “stop” aspects; and
( 3 ) through normal contacts of time releases, time element relays, or timing devices for such conflicting routes, or contacts of relays repeating the normal position or normal state of such time releases, time element relays, or timing devices.
[49 FR 3385, Jan. 26, 1984]
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*Martin Owens, Appellant, v. John N. Partridge, as Police Commissioner, etc., Respondent.

Order of commissioner affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J,
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 15, 2014

No. 04

- 14

- 00283

- CR

IN RE Martin FELAN

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

Luz Elena D. Chap a , Justice

On June 30, 2014, relator filed a motion for rehearing. The panel has considered the

motion and it is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on July 15 th , 2014. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2005CR2635 , styled The State of Texas v. Martin Felan , pending in the

399th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ray Olivarri presiding.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the ninth meeting of the American Health Information Community Personalized Healthcare Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

# DATES:

October 25, 2007, from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. [Eastern Time].

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C. Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090. Please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthcare/​.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup will discuss possible common data standards to incorporate interoperable, clinically useful genetic/genomic information and analytical tools into Electronic Health Records (EHR) to support clinical decision-making for the clinician and consumer.

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthcare/​phc_​instruct.html.*

Dated: September 7, 2007.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 07-4507 Filed 9-12-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
```

[109th Congress Public Law 52]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ052.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 461]]

Public Law 109-52
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 1560 Union Valley Road in West Milford, New Jersey, as the ``Brian P. 
  Parrello Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Aug. 2, 2005 -  [S. 904]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BRIAN P. PARRELLO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1560 Union Valley Road in West Milford, New Jersey, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Brian P. Parrello Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Brian P. 
Parrello Post Office Building''.

    Approved August 2, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 904:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            June 29, considered and passed Senate.
            July 26, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
I, Richard R. Schreiber, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Chief Consolidated Mining Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 5, 2008


/s/ Richard R. SchreiberRichard R. Schreiber
Chief Financial Officer


---
Exhibit 21.6





                          PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                              AT DECEMBER 31, 2002



                                                                    STATE OF
    NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                     BUSINESS               ORGANIZATION
    ------------------                     --------               ------------


NINEVEH WATER COMPANY                WATER SERVICE                PENNSYLVANIA

THE WAVERLY ELECTRIC LIGHT           ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION        PENNSYLVANIA
 AND POWER COMPANY

PENELEC PREFERRED CAPITAL II, INC.   SPECIAL-PURPOSE FINANCE      DELAWARE
  PENELEC CAPITAL II, L.P.           SPECIAL-PURPOSE FINANCE      DELAWARE
  PENELEC CAPITAL TRUST              SPECIAL-PURPOSE FINANCE      DELAWARE



Note:  Penelec, along with its affiliates JCP&L and Met-Ed, collectively own all
       of the  common  stock  of  Saxton  Nuclear  Experimental  Corporation,  a
       Pennsylvania  nonprofit  corporation  organized for nuclear  experimental
       purposes  which  is now  inactive.  The  carrying  value  of the  owners'
       investment has been written down to a nominal value.
**Exhibit 32.b**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofCinergy Corp., The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, PSI Energy, Inc. andThe Union Light, Heat and Power Company (the “Companies”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James L. Turner, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to thebest of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Companies.

 
| Date:  February 25, 2005 |
|------------------------------------|
|                               |
| /s/                                | James L. Turner |   |
|                               | James L. Turner |
|                               | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Tim Robertson

Sur

- Com Technologies, LLC

6047 Childrens Home Bradford Road

Greenville, OH 45331

I formally petition the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for exemption from the following specific sections for which Su r

Com Technologies, LLC is seeking an exemption:

IN THE MATTER OF PETITION, SUR

- COM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC IS SEEKING EXEMPTION RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS

OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) AND (b), AND 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b),

91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1) AN D (a)(2)M AND 91.417(a) AND (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI PAHNTOM

3 AND DJI INSPIRE 1 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND

REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112

- 95).

Extent of relief and our reason for seeking relief:

In order to use an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for commercial use. We are seeking this exemption in order to

legally and safely conduct business and comply with all federal regulations and standards put forth by the FAA while

operat ing unmanned aircraft systems.

Benefits to the public from exemption:

Granting the exemption for Sur

- Com Technologies would allow for efficient, legal, economical, and safe operation of the

unmanned aircraft for AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY, AERIAL VIDEO, SPECIAL COORDINATED EVENTS, LAND SURVEILLANCE,

REAL ESTATE, COMMERCIAL INSPECTIONS, LAND MANAGEMENT, WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, AGRICULTURAL,

SEARCH AND RESCUE, TELEVISION AND VIDEO BROADCASTS.

Reason Exemption would not adversely affect safety, or how the exempti on would provide a level of safety at least equal to

the existing rule:

Enhanced safety will be achieved by using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with and will carrying no passengers or crew,

rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gives

good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is safer and in the public interest.

During operation of the unmanned aircraft the operator(s) will adhere to all guidelines set forth by the FAA

including keeping the ceiling of operation at or under 400 feet, proper UAV training, proper preflight inspections,

avoidance of manned aircraft, recognizing no fly zones, and preplanning all commercial uses to ensure efficient and safe

use.

Summary for publish in the Federal Registry:

1. SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS

61.113(a) AND (b), AND 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1) AND (a)(2)M AND 91.417(a) AND (b)

CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI PAHNTOM 3 AND DJI INSPIRE 1 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT

SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012

(PUBLIC LAW 112

- 95).

2. SUR

- COM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC IS SEEKING EXEMPTION IN ORDER TO USE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT FOR

COMMERCIAL USE.

Submitted on July 14, 2015 by:

Tim Robertson

Sur

- Com Technologies, LLC

6047 Childrens Home Bradford Road

Greenville, OH 45331

tim@surcomtech.com

www.surcomtech.com
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, October 6, 1995 (124), Para 124.5 Veto of H.R. 1854]
[Page 1495]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.124.5  veto of h.r. 1854

  The Clerk then read the veto message from the President, as follows:

To the House of Representatives:
  I am returning today without my approval H.R. 1854, the ``Legislative 
Branch Appropriations Bill, FY 1996.''
  H.R. 1854 is, in fact, a disciplined bill, one that I would sign under 
different circumstances. But, at this point, Congress has completed 
action on only 2 of the 13 FY 1996 appropriations bills: this one and 
H.R. 1817, the Military Construction appropriations bill. Thus, the vast 
majority of Federal activities lack final FY 1996 funding and are 
operating under a short-term continuing resolution.
  I appreciate the willingness of Congress to work with my 
administration to produce an acceptable short-term continuing resolution 
before completing action on the regular, full-year appropriations bills 
for FY 1996. I believe, however, that it would be inappropriate to 
provide full-year regular funding for Congress and its offices while 
funding for most other activities of Government remains incomplete, 
unresolved, and uncertain.
  As I said 2 months ago, I don't think Congress should take care of its 
own business before it takes care of the people's business. I stated 
that if the congressional leadership were to follow through on its plan 
to send me its own funding bill before finishing work on the rest of the 
budget, I would veto it. I am now following through on that commitment.
  I urge the Congress to move forward promptly on completing the FY 1996 
appropriations bills in a form that I can accept.
                                                   William J. Clinton.  
  The White House, October 3, 1995.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mrs. MORELLA, by unanimous consent, ordered 
that the veto message, together with the accompanying bill, be printed 
(H. Doc. 104-122) and spread upon the pages of the Journal of the House.
  On motion of Mr. DAVIS, by unanimous consent, further consideration of 
the veto message was postponed until Thursday, October 12, 1995.
```
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 4:53 PM

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jy8-yiwl

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2160

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Roger Halstread

General Comment

I am retired and planned just fine without the government's intervention. With guidance from a 

good financial planner to get them started early enough, anyone can retire without the 

government's help. The government should have no hand in peoples retirement. The government 

has a history of poor financial management. Therefor they should not be allowed to touch 

peoples retirement savings and investments.
Gordon Bennett

TELE: 1+717

- 571

- 2274

FlyingMonkey2@hotmail.com

Flashnine@msn.com

June 16, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request Section 333 , A ddendum to docket : FAA

- 2015

- 1392

As requested by: 

### Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Flying Monkey Aerial Videography will be flying :

2

- Walkera 350 Pr o Quad Copters , with camera gimbals and video cameras weighing 3550

grams or 7.92 Lbs. B oth contain auto pilot function and geo

- fencing capabilities.

1

- Foam American eagle look alike fixed wing , single electric motor aircraft with APM 2.6

auto pil ot and geo fencing capabilities. A video camera and transmitte r weighing a total of

4.3 Lbs. M anufacture: H obby K ing M odels for fix wing RC airplane. Auto pilot functions by

Flying Monkey Aerial Videography

1

- 14 Ft. Helium blimp tethered, Manufacturer Arizon a B allo o n C ompany , with no motors ,

with a amp 2.6 auto pilot system for telemetry for geo fencing capabilities. This system is set

up for video services by Fl ying Monkey Aerial Videography and APM 2.6 is the fail safe for

auto deflate in case of fly away. Telemetry with GPS down link for location. ( Safety First )

Total Weight with Camer as and Transmitters is 9 Lbs.

Part 101

- Moored Balloons , Kits , Amateur Rockets and Unmanned free Ballo o ns thru Part 

### 101.19

-



### Rapid d eflation device

Gordon Bennett
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDiode laser satellite systems for beamed power transmissionA power system composed of an orbiting laser satellite and a surface-based receiver/converter is described. Power is transmitted from the satellite to the receiver/converter by laser beam. The satellite components are: (1) solar collector; (2) blackbody; (3) photovoltaic cells; (4) heat radiators; (5) laser system; and (6) transmission optics. The receiver/converter components are: receiver dish; lenticular lens; photocells; and heat radiator. Although the system can be adapted to missions at many locations in the solar system, only two are examined here: powering a lunar habitat; and powering a lunar rover. Power system components are described and their masses, dimensions, operating powers, and temperatures, are estimated using known or feasible component capabilities. The critical technologies involved are discussed and other potential missions are mentioned.Document ID19900015269Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsWilliams, M. D.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Kwon, J. H.*(Miami Univ. Oxford, OH., United States)*Walker, G. H.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Humes, D. H.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryLasers And MasersReport/Patent NumberL-16669NAS 1.60:2992NASA-TP-2992Accession Number90N24585Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-41-41-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900015269.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024