alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 178 (Friday, September 14, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 52747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4600]



[[Page 52745]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part IV





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Executive Order 13444--Extending Privileges and Immunities to the 
African Union Mission to the United States


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 178 / Friday, September 14, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 52747]]

                Executive Order 13444 of September 12, 2007

                
Extending Privileges and Immunities to the 
                African Union Mission to the United States

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 7(a)(2) of the Department of 
                State Authorities Act of 2006 (Public Law 109-472), I 
                hereby extend to the African Union Mission to the 
                United States of America, and to its members, the 
                privileges and immunities enjoyed by diplomatic 
                missions accredited to the United States, and by 
                members of such missions, subject to corresponding 
                conditions and obligations.

                This extension of privileges and immunities is not 
                intended to abridge in any respect privileges and 
                immunities that the African Union Mission to the United 
                States of America and its members otherwise may have 
                acquired or may acquire by law. 
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    September 12, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-4600
Filed 9-13-07; 9:00 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:Stop bullying now! : take a stand, lend a hand : resource kit.**** 
SuDocNumber:HE20.9002:B 87/KIT
ItemNumber:0507-H-17(online)
CGPsystem Number:000584849
 
 - SBN_Tip_01.pdfSBN_Tip_02.pdfSBN_Tip_03.pdfSBN_Tip_04.pdfSBN_Tip_05.pdfSBN_Tip_06.pdfSBN_Tip_07.pdfSBN_Tip_08.pdfSBN_Tip_09.pdfSBN_Tip_10.pdfSBN_Tip_11.pdfSBN_Tip_12.pdfSBN_Tip_13.pdfSBN_Tip_14.pdfSBN_Tip_15.pdfSBN_Tip_16.pdfSBN_Tip_17.pdfSBN_Tip_18.pdfSBN_Tip_19.pdfSBN_Tip_20.pdfSBN_Tip_21.pdfSBN_Tip_22.pdfSBN_Tip_23.pdfSBN_Tip_24.pdfSBN_Tip_25.pdfSBN_Tip_26.pdfSBN_Tip_27.pdfSBN_Tip_28.pdfSBN_Tip_29.pdfSBN_Tip_30.pdfSBN_Tip_31.pdf
 **
**Exhibit
        4**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul O.
        Richins, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              the
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 
 /s/ Paul O.
        Richins
 Paul
        O.
        Richins
 May
        9,
        2006
 
 
 *A
        signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
        document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
        that
        appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
        has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:I do believe that allowing responsible citizens to participate in commerce using this technology(UAS) will benefit consumers as well s business owners. well as business owners . Safety concerns are well founded. Please keep in mind that a business is attempting to generate commerce not spend it. This reality alone causes business owners to protect their investment. In doing so the public directly benefits from this diligent effort to keep the tools of the trade intact. Thank You for your consideration in this matter. Michael Starley
H. Res. 162

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 13, 2001.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2052) to facilitate famine relief efforts and a

comprehensive solution to the war in Sudan. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order against

consideration of the bill for failure to comply with clause 4(a)

of rule XIII are waived. General debate shall be confined to

the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on International Relations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the

five-minute rule. Each section of the bill shall be considered

as read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the

Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority

in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering

an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of
2

•HRES 162 EH

the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in

clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill

for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on

the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification Pursuant To

Rule 13A-14(a) or 15D-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael Wellesley-Wesley, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chyron Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) reserved - not effective;



c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.









Date: March 31, 2005







|/s/ Michael Wellesley-Wesley
|----------------------------
|Michael Wellesley-Wesley    
|President and               
|Chief Executive Officer
#### §§ 37.111-37.119 [Reserved]
§ 213.359 Track stiffness. ( a ) Track shall have a sufficient vertical strength to withstand the maximum vehicle loads generated at maximum permissible train speeds, cant deficiencies and surface defects. For purposes of this section, vertical track strength is defined as the track capacity to constrain vertical deformations so that the track shall return following maximum load to a configuration in compliance with the vehicle/track interaction safety limits and geometry requirements of this subpart.
( b ) Track shall have sufficient lateral strength to withstand the maximum thermal and vehicle loads generated at maximum permissible train speeds, cant deficiencies and lateral alinement defects. For purposes of this section lateral track strength is defined as the track capacity to constrain lateral deformations so that track shall return following maximum load to a configuration in compliance with the vehicle/track interaction safety limits and geometry requirements of this subpart.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1432.html[7/23/2015 10:37:36 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvn-kre0

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1432

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Judy N

General Comment

Hands off my retirement. I earned it. I will spend it as I choose, not you who are making a living off my taxes.

 Go home.
#### § 378.8 Disposition of claims.

The processing carrier shall pay, decline to pay, or settle each written claim within 60 days after its receipt by that carrier, except where the claimant and the carrier agree in writing to a specific extension based upon extenuating circumstances. If the carrier declines to pay a claim or makes settlement in an amount different from that sought, the carrier shall notify the claimant in writing of the reason(s) for its action, citing tariff authority or other pertinent information developed as a result of its investigation.

[83 FR 16225, Apr. 16, 2018]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-11-1997
<CASH>                                       1,656,786
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    752,635
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,868,989
<PP&E>                                      74,131,416
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,597,185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,145,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,758,066
<BONDS>                                     34,825,435
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       414,839
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,080,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,145,928
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,608,936
<CGS>                                       12,808,939
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               41,486,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,017,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,440,912
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,584,345
<INCOME-TAX>                                   480,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,104,345
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,104,345
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
        

</TABLE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2011

t0620 

# Order

June 28, 2011

142925

KIRK LEAPHART, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 142925 COA: 301016 Wayne CC: 09-020326-NO CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 10, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 29.105 Will negotiations commence or conclude within a specified time period?

Unless the Department and the Tribe agree otherwise, negotiations will commence within 60 days of the Department's receipt of the Tribe's written request to negotiate a compact, funding agreement, or amendment. The Department and the Tribe should make every effort to conclude negotiations within 90 days from the date on which negotiations commence, unless they agree to extend the time period for negotiations. Negotiations may proceed by electronic mail, teleconferences, or in-person meetings.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated 
effective October 24,  1994, amends that certain Employment 
Agreement ("Employment Agreement") by and among Cinergy 
Corp., a Delaware corporation ("Cinergy"), Cinergy Services, 
Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Cinergy Services"), The 
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, an Ohio corporation 
("CG&E"), PSI Energy, Inc., an Indiana corporation ("PSI"), 
and Cheryl M. Foley (the "Executive") dated effective 
October 24, 1994.  Cinergy, Cinergy Services, CG&E, and PSI 
will sometimes be referred to in this First Amendment to 
Employment Agreement collectively as the "Corporation".  
This First Amendment to Employment Agreement amends the 
Employment Agreement as follows:
1.  The substantive provisions of  Section 1(b) are 
deleted in their entirety and replaced with the 
following:

"The Employment Period of the Executive as provided in 
Section 1(a) will commence on October 24, 1994 
(the "Effective Date") and shall continue until 
December 31, 1997; provided, however, commencing 
on January 1, 1996, and each January 1 thereafter 
(the "Renewal Date"), the Employment Period of 
this Employment Agreement shall automatically be 
extended for one (1) additional year if neither 
the Corporation nor the Executive shall have given 
between December 1 and December 15 prior to each 
applicable Renewal Date written notice to the 
other of its intent to terminate this Employment 
Agreement."

2.  All other provisions of the Employment Agreement 
remain unchanged by this First Amendment to 
Employment Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Corporation 
have caused this First Amendment to Employment Agreement to 
be executed effective as of the day and year first above 
written.


CINERGY CORP., CINERGY SERVICES, INC.,
THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, 
and PSI ENERGY, INC.



By:              James E Rogers
                  (James E. Rogers)
                Vice Chairman and
             Chief Executive Officer 



EXECUTIVE


                 Cheryl M. Foley
                (Cheryl M. Foley)
§ 31.34 Evidence. ( a ) The ALJ shall determine the admissibility of evidence.
( b ) Except as provided in this part, the ALJ shall not be bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence. However, the ALJ may apply the Federal Rules of Evidence where appropriate, *e.g.,* to exclude unreliable evidence.
( c ) The ALJ shall exclude irrelevant and immaterial evidence.
( d ) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
( e ) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if it is privileged under Federal law.
( f ) Evidence concerning offers of compromise or settlement shall be inadmissible to the extent provided in Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
( g ) The ALJ shall permit the parties to introduce rebuttal witnesses and evidence.
( h ) All documents and other evidence offered or taken for the record shall be open to examination by all parties, unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ pursuant to § 31.24.
###### Editorial Note on Part 387

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 387 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 387.13 Fiduciaries.

The coverage of fiduciaries shall attach at the moment of succession of such fiduciaries.

[46 FR 30982, June 11, 1981]
#### Ellen Greany, *Respondent, v.*The Long Island Railroad Company, *Appellant.*

— Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
-----Original Message----- 

From: m.moats@3arts.us [mailto:m.moats@3arts.us] 

Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 3:29 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 02, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Michael Moats 

1100 Maple Ave. 

Downers Grove, IL 60515
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1452.html[7/23/2015 11:09:53 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-29ca

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1452

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jill Mark

General Comment

I have been planning for retirement since I was 20 years old. If the government does its part to keep Social

 security afloat and health insurance costs as low as possible, I will be fine. My investments in retirement

 accounts should be mine to use as I please. Stay out of my money management ! I have no say on how my taxes

 are spent...thus, you have no say on how my life savings should be spent. 

P.s. I've been a legal citizen of this great country and have paid my exhorbitant taxes every year. You've already

 spent enough of my money on wasteful things and entitlement programs , even on benefits for illegal aliens.

 Enough is enough!
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 110

Providing that it shall not be in order in the House of Representatives

to consider certain funding measures for the United States Patent and

Trademark Office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 3, 2001

Mr. BERMAN (for himself and Mr. BOUCHER) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Providing that it shall not be in order in the House of

Representatives to consider certain funding measures for

the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

1 Resolved, That it shall not be in order in the House

2 of Representatives to consider any bill, joint resolution,

3 amendment, motion, or conference report that makes

4 available funds to the United States Patent and Trade5 mark Office for any fiscal year, or for any other period

6 for which the funds are provided, in amounts less than

7 the total amount of patent and trademark fees collected

8 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in that
2

•HRES 110 IH

1 fiscal year or during that other period (as the case may

2 be).

Æ
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1061.html[7/22/2015 7:10:05 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-2hmx

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1061

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Cliff Pluard Sr.

General Comment

The federal government is out of line if they want to mess with my retirement benefits that I worked and saved

 for. Keep your hands off any of my retirement accounts.