alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: bjbug@hotmail.com [mailto:bjbug@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 2:48 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 02, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Betty Weber 

846 NE 89th Street 

Seattle, WA 98115
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the related
Form 10-K financial statements for The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
Income tax expense includes $11,932,000 related to other income.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000020947
<NAME> THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    3,074,043
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    689,270
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         388,268
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,166,602
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,318,183
<COMMON>                                       931,962
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             76,276
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,008,238
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          149,710
<PREFERRED>                                    238,325
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,888,202
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              80,618
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  144,530
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       33,464
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                30,056
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,745,040
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                6,318,183
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,782,376
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           110,612
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,314,794
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,413,474
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        368,902
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              25,393
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 394,295
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       229,404
<NET-INCOME>                                   164,891
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     24,794
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  140,097
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        85,958
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      216,550
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         349,056
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 995

To provide permanent appropriations to the Radiation Exposure Compensation Trust Fund to make payments under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note).

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 13, 2001

Mr. MCINNIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Appropriations

A BILL

To provide permanent appropriations to the Radiation Exposure Compensation Trust Fund to make payments under

the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C.

2210 note).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RADIATION EXPOSURE COMPENSATION TRUST

4 FUND APPROPRIATIONS.

5 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the

6 ‘‘Paul Hicks Memorial Act’’.

7 (b) APPROPRIATIONS.—There are appropriated, out

8 of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated,
2

•HR 995 IH

1 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and each

2 fiscal year thereafter, such sums as may be necessary to

3 the Radiation Exposure Compensation Trust Fund for the

4 purpose of making payments to eligible beneficiaries under

5 the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C.

6 2210 note).

Æ
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-11935

 

 

CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX,LP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
-----Original Message----- 

From: i.casillas@comcast.net [mailto:i.casillas@comcast.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 7:09 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ida Casillas 

P. O. Box 221214 

Sacramento, CA 95822
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 5/27/15 8:28 AM

Received: May 19, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8iy3-jo9j

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0288

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Nicholas Guilbeault

Address: 

452 Massachusetts Ave

North Andover, MA, 01845

Email: sintax3rror+regulationsgov@gmail.com

Phone: 6177637077

General Comment

I believe financial institutions on whole should be held more accountable for advice and 

handling of their customer/client's money. In this instance in particular I find it incredible 

important as most people are not able to understand the investments that they need to make to 

secure their financial futures. In most cases the knowledge that they have been mislead and their 

finances affected takes place long after the likelihood of justice against the people whom 

misdirected investments is likely if possible at all. This is a case of people with financial 

knowledge using it to walk over people who don't and get richer in the process.

To put it in simpler words. Its just wrong.

Please use your time and energies to correcting this deplorable practice. Thank you.

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481aea396&format=xml&show... 5/27/2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,919
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,163,214
<OTHER-SE>                               (10,172,1733)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.12


 


FRIENDLY ICE CREAM CORPORATION


 


BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPENSATION


 


	
  A.

  	
  Annual Retainer

  	
   

  	
  Directors

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  30,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chairman

  	
   

  	
  Additional

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  100,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  B.

  	
  Regularly Scheduled Board of Directors Meetings

  	
   

  	
  Directors

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,500

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  C.

  	
  Regularly Scheduled Committee Meetings

  	
   

  	
  Members

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  D.

  	
  Special Teleconference Meetings

  	
   

  	
  Directors

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  750

  	
   

  



 


A.            Each
director, including the Chairman, of the Company receives a fee of $2,500 per
month. Mr. Donald Smith receives additional compensation of $8,333.34 per month
for serving as Chairman of the Board.


 


B.            Each
director of the Company receives $1,500, plus expenses, for each regularly
scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors attended.


 


C.            Each
member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee
receives a fee of $1,000, plus expenses, for each regularly scheduled committee
meeting attended. Each member of the Audit Committee receives a fee of $1,500,
plus expenses, for attendance at the annual Audit Committee meeting.


 


D.            Each
director receives a fee of $750 for participating in special teleconference
meetings.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50351

Summary Calendar

 

CEWILLA JOHNSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SHIRLEY S. CHATER,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-94-CV-392

- - - - - - - - - -

December 4, 1996

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Cewilla Johnson appeals from the district court’s judgment

affirming the denial of her application for disability insurance

benefits and supplemental security income. She argues that

substantial evidence did not exist to support the finding that

her mental impairment was not severe and that the administrative

law judge failed to properly address her medical diagnosis of

schizophrenia. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED for 
No. 96-50351

- 2 -

essentially the reasons stated by the district court. See

Johnson v. Chater, No. A-94-CA-392-SS (W.D. Tex. Apr. 22, 1996).

AFFIRMED.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDesign of an autonomous teleoperated cargo transporting vehicle for lunar base operationsAt the turn of the century NASA plans to begin construction of a lunar base. The base will likely consist of developed areas (i.e., habitation, laboratory, landing and launching sites, power plant) separated from each other due to safety considerations. The Self-Repositioning Track Vehicle (SRTV) was designed to transport cargo between these base facilities. The SRTV operates by using two robotic arms to raise and position segments of track upon which the vehicle travels. The SRTV utilizes the semiautonomous mobility (SAM) method of teleoperation; actuator-controlled interlocking track sections; two robotic arms each with five degrees of freedom; and these materials: titanium for structural members and aluminum for shell members, with the possible use of light-weight, high-strength composites.Document ID19900015317Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHolt, James*(Texas Univ. Austin, TX, United States)*Lao, Tom*(Texas Univ. Austin, TX, United States)*Monali, Nkoy*(Texas Univ. Austin, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1989Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186686NASA-CR-186686Accession Number90N24633Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASW-4435Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900015317.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
119 STAT. 2034 PUBLIC LAW 109–75—SEPT. 29, 2005

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1340:

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109–125 (Comm. on Environment and Public Works).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

Sept. 9, considered and passed Senate.

Sept. 20, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 109–75

109th Congress

An Act

To amend the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act to extend the date after

which surplus funds in the wildlife restoration fund become available for apportionment.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF SURPLUS FUNDS IN WILDLIFE RESTORATION FUND.

Section 3(b)(2)(C) of the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration

Act (16 U.S.C. 669b(b)(2)(C) is amended by striking ‘‘2006’’ and

inserting ‘‘2016’’.

Approved September 29, 2005.

Sept. 29, 2005

[S. 1340]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                          57,496
<SECURITIES>                                    14,415
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,115
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,269
<PP&E>                                         124,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (82,022)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,609
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       132,014
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,152
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,775
<SALES>                                        100,211
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               167,531
<CGS>                                           13,657
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,476
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               106,527
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,488
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,546
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,942
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,942
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18



</TABLE>
§ 379.1 Applicability. ( a ) The preservation of record rules contained in this part shall apply to the following: ( 1 ) Motor carriers and brokers;
( 2 ) Water carriers; and
( 3 ) Household goods freight forwarders.
( b ) This part applies also to the preservation of accounts, records and memoranda of traffic associations, weighing and inspection bureaus, and other joint activities maintained by or on behalf of companies listed in paragraph (a) of this section.
§ 31.31 Determining the amount of penalties and assessments. ( a ) In determining an appropriate amount of civil penalties and assessments, the ALJ and the authority head, upon appeal, should evaluate any circumstances that mitigate or aggravate the violation and should articulate in their opinions the reasons that support the penalties and assessments they impose. Because of the intangible costs of fraud, the expense of investigating such conduct, and the need to deter others who might be similarly tempted, ordinarily double damages and a significant civil penalty should be imposed.
( b ) Although not exhaustive, the following factors are among those that may influence the ALJ and the authority head in determining the amount of penalties and assessments to impose with respect to the misconduct (*i.e.,* the false fictitious, of fraudulent claims or statements) charged in the complaint: ( 1 ) The number of false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or statements;
( 2 ) The time period over which such claims or statements were made;
( 3 ) The degree of the defendant's culpability with respect to the misconduct;
( 4 ) The amount of money or the value of the property, services, or benefit falsely claimed;
( 5 ) The value of the Government's actual loss as a result of the misconduct, including foreseeable consequential damages and the costs of investigation;
( 6 ) The relationship of the amount imposed as civil penalties to the amount of the Government's loss;
( 7 ) The potential or actual impact of the misconduct upon national defense, public health or safety, or public confidence in the management of Government programs and operations, including particularly the impact on the intended beneficiaries of such programs;
( 8 ) Whether the defendant has engaged in a pattern of the same or similar misconduct;
( 9 ) Whether the defendant attempted to conceal the misconduct;
( 10 ) The degree to which the defendant has involved others in the misconduct or in concealing it;
( 11 ) Where the misconduct of employees or agents is imputed to the defendant, the extent to which the defendant's practices fostered or attempted to preclude such misconduct;
( 12 ) Whether the defendant cooperated in or obstructed an investigation of the misconduct;
( 13 ) Whether the defendant assisted in identifying and prosecuting other wrongdoers;
( 14 ) The complexity of the program or transaction, and the degree of the defendant's sophistication with respect to it, including the extent of the defendant's prior participation in the program or in similar transactions;
( 15 ) Whether the defendant has been found, in any criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding to have engaged in similar misconduct or to have dealt dishonestly with the Government of the United States or of a State, directly or indirectly; and
( 16 ) The need to deter the defendant and others from engaging in the same or similar misconduct.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ALJ or the authority head from considering any other factors that in any given case may mitigate or aggravate the offense for which penalties and assessments are imposed.
Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David H. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Thomas L. Redding, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David H. GillDavid H. Gill, President and CEO(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Thomas L. ReddingThomas L. Redding, Sr. Vice President and CFO(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


August 7, 2008