alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 372.229 Spokane, WA. The zone adjacent to, and commercially a part of Spokane, WA, within which transportation by motor vehicle, in interstate or foreign commerce, not under control, management, or arrangement for shipment to or from points beyond such zone, is partially exempt from regulation under 49 U.S.C. 13506(b)(1) includes and is comprised of all points as follows: ( a ) The municipality of Spokane, WA, itself,
( b ) All points within a line drawn 8 miles beyond the municipal limits of Spokane;
( c ) All points within that area more than 8 miles beyond the municipal limits of Spokane bounded by a line as follows: From the intersection of the line described in (b) of this section and U.S. Highway 2, thence westerly along U.S. Highway 2 to junction Brooks Road, thence southerly along Brooks Road to junction Hallett Road, thence easterly along Hallett Road to its intersection with the line described in (b) of this section;
( d ) All of any municipality any part of which is within the limits of the combined areas in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section; and
( e ) All of any municipality wholly surrounded, or so surrounded except for a water boundary, by the municipality of Spokane or any other municipality included under the terms of paragraph (d) of this section.
[45 FR 62085, Sept. 18, 1980. Redesignated and amended at 55 FR 42198, Oct. 18, 1990; 62 FR 15422, Apr. 1, 1997; 78 FR 58478, Sept. 24, 2013]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1964

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to the unknown

Vermonter who lost his life while serving in the Continental Army in

the War of Independence and who has been selected by the people

of Vermont to represent all Vermont unknown soldiers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 29, 1995

Mr. SANDERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on National Security

A BILL

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor

to the unknown Vermonter who lost his life while serving

in the Continental Army in the War of Independence

and who has been selected by the people of Vermont

to represent all Vermont unknown soldiers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF MEDAL OF HONOR.

4 The President may award, and present in the name

5 of Congress, the Medal of Honor to the unknown Ver6 monter who lost his life while serving in the War of Inde7 pendence as a member of the Continental Army and who
2

•HR 1964 IH

1 has been selected by the people of Vermont to represent

2 all Vermont unknown soldiers.

Æ
#### § 350.101 What is the purpose of this part?

The purpose of this part is to provide direction for entities seeking MCSAP or High Priority Program funding to improve motor carrier, CMV, and driver safety.
exv10w17



 






Exhibit 10.17




Joseph Michael Mayer Compensation Package Term Sheet




	 	 	 	 	 
	Base Annual Salary
	 	$250,000	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Incentive Bonus @ Plan
	 	$150,000	 	E-30%, EV-60%, OA-90%
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Stock Options-Annual
	 	# TBD	 	multiple of base salary
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Car Allowance-Annual
	 	$9,600	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Normal Severance
	 	12 months(a)	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Vacation-Annual
	 	4 weeks	 	 








 




			
	(a)	 	severance is for involuntary termination “not for cause” as defined in J. Winkler’s 2005 employment agreement; severance is 12 months base salary and bonus
at EV; bonus for year of termination is pro-rated at EV (or higher based on actual results); and all stock options and restricted stock become 100% vested.





	 	 	 	 	 
	Effective Date

	 	December 1, 2005
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Joe Winkler

	 	/s/ J.M. Mayer	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Approved:

	 	Accepted:	 	 
	Joe Winkler

	 	J.M. Mayer	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Date 2/23/06

	 	Date 2/23/06
Filed 1/28/16 P. v. Adams CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

 Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

PAUL EDWARD ADAMS,

 Defendant and Appellant.

2d Crim. No. B263313

(Super. Ct. No. BA191617-01)

(Los Angeles County)

Paul Edward Adams appeals an order denying his petition to recall his 

sentence pursuant to Penal Code section 1170.126.1

On January 5, 2000, Adams was convicted of attempted robbery and assault 

with a deadly weapon, with findings of personal deadly weapon use, two prior serious 

felony strike convictions, and service of two prior prison terms. (§§ 664, 211, 245, subd. 

(a)(1), 12022, subd. (b)(1), 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d), 667.5, subd. (b).) 

On February 2, 2000, the trial court sentenced Adams to a prison term of 25 years to life, 

as a third strike offender. 

On August 21, 2014, Adams filed a petition to recall his sentence pursuant 

to section 1170.126. On March 16, 2015, the trial court considered and denied the 

petition, ruling that Adams's current conviction for attempted robbery is a serious felony 

 

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.
2

pursuant to section 1192.7, subdivision (c)(39), thus precluding recall of sentence and 

resentencing. 

We appointed counsel to represent Adams in this appeal. After counsel's 

examination of the record, he filed an opening brief raising no issues.

On November 12, 2015, we advised Adams by mail that he had 30 days 

within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished to raise on 

appeal. We have not received a response.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Adams's attorney 

has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. 

Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

GILBERT, P.J.

We concur:

YEGAN, J.

PERREN, J.
3

William C. Ryan, Judge

Superior Court County of Los Angeles

______________________________

Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for 

Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
§ 37.71 Purchase or lease of new non-rail vehicles by public entities operating fixed route systems. ( a ) Each public entity operating a fixed route system making a solicitation after August 25, 1990, to purchase or lease a new bus or other new vehicle for use on the system, shall ensure that the vehicle is readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs.
[56 FR 45621, Sept. 6, 1991, as amended at 76 FR 57936, Sept. 19, 2011]
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. (Duke Energy Ohio) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Hauser, Group Executive
and Chief Financial Officer of Duke Energy Ohio, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy Ohio.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DAVID L.
HAUSER                                                    
|David L. Hauser Group Executive
and Chief Financial Officer March 30, 2007
**Exhibit 10.m**

 

**AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

 

TheEmployment Agreement between Cinergy Corp., its subsidiaries and/or itsaffiliates (“Cinergy”) and Marc E. Manly (the “Executive”) dated as ofNovember 15, 2002 (the “Agreement”) is hereby amended effective as ofDecember 17, 2003.

 

**AMENDMENTS**

 

1.             Section 3b(ii)(4) of the Agreement is herebyamended and restated to read, in its entirety, as follows:

 

“Exceptas provided in Sections 3b(ii)(3) and 3b(ii)(5), the supplemental retirementbenefit shall not be payable in the form of a single lump sum.”

 

2.             Section 3b(ii) of the Agreement is hereby amendedby adding the following new subsection (5) at the end thereof:

###### ** **

###### **“(5)  Special Payment Election Without a Changein Control.  Notwithstanding theforegoing, the Executive may make an election, on a form provided by Cinergy,to receive a single lump sum cash payment in an amount equal to one-half of theActuarial Equivalent (as defined above in Section 3b(ii)(3)(D)) of hissupplemental retirement benefit payable no later than 30 days after the date ofhis termination of employment.  In orderto be effective, the special payment election under this Section 3b(ii)(5)must be made either (A) at least one year prior to the termination of theExecutive’s employment with Cinergy or (B) during 2003 and at least six monthsprior to the termination of the Executive’s employment with Cinergy.  The lump sum amount payable pursuant to thisSection 3b(ii)(5) shall be calculated in accordance with the provisions ofSection 3b(ii)(3)(D).  In the eventan amount is paid to or on behalf of the Executive pursuant to thisSection 3b(ii)(5), such payment shall discharge any liability under thisAgreement to or on behalf of the Executive with respect to one-half of theActuarial Equivalent (as defined above in Section 3b(ii)(3)(D)) of hissupplemental retirement benefit.”**

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and Cinergy have caused this Amendment to theAgreement to be executed as of the date first specified above.

 
|   | CINERGY SERVICES,  INC. |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   |                    |   |
|   | By:                     | /s/  James E. Rogers |   |
|   |                    | James E. Rogers |
|   |                    | Chairman and |
|   |                    | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                    |   |
|   |                    |   |
|   | EXECUTIVE               |
|   |                    |   |
|   | /s/ Marc E. Manly       |   |
|   | Marc E. Manly           |

 

----

3
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0589.html[7/20/2015 9:36:29 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-abik

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0589

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: laura crosby

Address:

3874 skunk creek rd

barnum, 55707

Email: lauracrosby64@yahoo.com

Phone: 2182138608

General Comment

I'm smart enough to plan my own retirement, leave my 401k alone! Don't change anything!!
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 107 appear at 67 FR 61011, Sept. 27, 2002, 70 FR 56089, Sept. 23, 2005, and 70 FR 73159, Dec. 9, 2005.

§ 107.501 Scope. ( a ) This subpart establishes a registration procedure for persons who are engaged in the manufacture, assembly, inspection and testing, certification, or repair of a cargo tank or a cargo tank motor vehicle manufactured in accordance with a DOT specification under subchapter C of this chapter or under terms of a special permit issued under this part.
( b ) Persons engaged in continuing qualification and maintenance of cargo tanks and cargo tank motor vehicles must be familiar with the requirements set forth in part 180, subpart E, of this chapter.
[Amdt. 107-20, 55 FR 37047, Sept. 7, 1990]
IB

Union Calendar No. 11

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 861

[Report No. 107–16]

To make technical amendments to section 10 of title 9, United States Code.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 2001

Mr. GEKAS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

MARCH 12, 2001

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To make technical amendments to section 10 of title 9,

United States Code.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. VACATION OF AWARDS.

4 Section 10 of title 9, United States Code, is

5 amended—
2

•HR 861 RH

1 (1) by indenting the margin of paragraphs (1)

2 through (4) of subsection (a) 2 ems;

3 (2) by striking ‘‘Where’’ in such paragraphs

4 and inserting ‘‘where’’;

5 (3) by striking the period at the end of para6 graphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (a) and insert7 ing a semicolon and by adding ‘‘or’’ at the end of

8 paragraph (3);

9 (4) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub10 section (c); and

11 (5) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘Where an

12 award’’ and inserting ‘‘If an award’’, by inserting a

13 comma after ‘‘expired’’, and by redesignating the

14 paragraph as subsection (b).

Union Calendar No. 11

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 861

[Report No. 107–16]

A BILL

To make technical amendments to section 10 of

title 9, United States Code.

MARCH 12, 2001

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2415

To designate the United States Customs Administrative Building at the

Ysleta/Zaragosa Port of Entry located at 797 South Ysleta in El Paso,

Texas, as the ‘‘Timothy C. McCaghren Customs Administrative Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1995

Mr. COLEMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

DECEMBER 12, 1995

The Committee on Ways and Means discharged

DECEMBER 12, 1995

Rereferred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the United States Customs Administrative

Building at the Ysleta/Zaragosa Port of Entry located

at 797 South Ysleta in El Paso, Texas, as the ‘‘Timothy

C. McCaghren Customs Administrative Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States Customs Administrative Building

5 at the Ysleta/Zaragosa Port of Entry located at 797 South
2

•HR 2415 RCH

1 Ysleta in El Paso, Texas, shall be known and designated

2 as the ‘‘Timothy C. McCaghren Customs Administrative

3 Building’’.

4 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

5 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

6 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

7 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

8 to the ‘‘Timothy C. McCaghren Customs Administrative

9 Building’’.

Æ
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0965.html[7/21/2015 6:59:02 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-f6d9

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0965

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Burt Brenneman

General Comment

I can plan and manage my own retirement savings. This is my money! The government has no right to it. Stay

 out of our business!
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF AUGUST 31, 1997 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,827
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       53
<ALLOWANCES>                                        12
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             220
<DEPRECIATION>                                     215
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,182
<OTHER-SE>                                     (20,764)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,989
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,228
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,311
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   817
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    13
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 425
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,675
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,308
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,367
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,367
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.26
        

</TABLE>
§ 230.97 Crank pins. ( a ) *General provisions.* Crank pins shall be securely applied. Securing the fit of a loose crank pin by shimming, prick punching, or welding is not permitted.
( b ) *Maintenance.* Crank pin collars and collar fasteners shall be maintained in a safe and suitable condition for service.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0887.html[7/21/2015 5:13:29 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-o72g

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0887

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Angie G

General Comment

Don't restrict how Americans use their own money from their 401ks/IRAs for their retirement.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40635

Summary Calendar

 

EDWIN WAYNE GARDENHIRE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOE MAX TAYLOR, SHERIFF, Individually

and in his official capacity,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-98-CV-18

- - - - - - - - - -

March 4, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its

own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th

Cir. 1987). In this civil rights case, defendant, Sheriff Joe

Max Taylor, has filed a notice of appeal from an order of the

district court granting in part and denying in part the motion to

dismiss the complaint filed by Galveston County and Sheriff

Taylor. The motion was granted as to claims against Sheriff

Taylor in his official capacity; it was denied as to claims 
No. 98-40635

-2-

against Sheriff Taylor in his individual capacity and as to

claims against Galveston County. 

Federal appellate courts have jurisdiction over appeals only

from (1) final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291; (2) orders that are

deemed final due to jurisprudential exception or which can be

properly certified as final pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);

and (3) interlocutory orders that fall into specific classes, 28

U.S.C. § 1292(a), or which can be properly certified for appeal

by the district court, 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). See Dardar v.

Lafourche Realty Co., 849 F.2d 955, 957 (5th Cir. 1988); Save the

Bay, Inc. v. United States Army, 639 F.2d 1100, 1102 (5th Cir.

1981). Sheriff Taylor’s motion in the district court was not

based on qualified immunity, nor did the district court’s order

and judgment contain a ruling on qualified immunity. As a

result, the district court's partial final judgment is not an

appealable interlocutory order. See Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472

U.S. 511, 530 (1975). We are therefore without jurisdiction to

entertain this appeal. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.