alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, David H. Gill, President and CEO, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 4, 2004 

 

/s/ David H. Gill

David H. Gill, President and CEO

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

2
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no

precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of wellsettled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens

on the legal profession." Pursuant to that rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 95-60289 

Summary Calendar

_______________

SHEILA BOWLES,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

(3:93 CV 825 BN)

_________________________

October 3, 1995

Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In this case charging that she was terminated as a result of

race and sex discrimination, the plaintiff appeals a summary

judgment holding that she failed to establish a prima facie case.

In a comprehensive opinion, the district court carefully

explained that the plaintiff was totally unable to work because

of illness and thus could not satisfy the requirement, essential
2

to establish a prima facie case, that she was able to perform the

work required of her. As the district court stated, this is

amply demonstrated by the record. Accordingly, and essentially

for the reasons set forth by the district court, the summary

judgment is AFFIRMED.
#### § 377.105 Collection and remittance.

Every motor carrier of property subject to 49 U.S.C. 13702, except as otherwise provided in § 377.101, which chooses to provide c.o.d. service may publish and maintain, or cause to be published and maintained for its account, a tariff or tariffs which set forth nondiscriminatory rules governing c.o.d. service and the collection and remittance of c.o.d. funds. Alternatively, any carrier that provides c.o.d. service, but does not wish to publish and maintain, or cause to be published and maintained, its own nondiscriminatory tariff, may adopt a rule requiring remittance of each c.o.d. collection directly to the consignor or other person designated by the consignor as payee within fifteen (15) days after delivery of the c.o.d. shipment to the consignee.

[52 FR 45966, Dec. 3, 1987, as amended at 62 FR 15424, Apr. 1, 1997; 81 FR 68346, Oct. 4, 2016]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTheoretical studies of solar pumped lasersOne concept for collecting solar energy is to use large solar collectors and then use lasers as energy converters whose output beams act as transmission lines to deliver the energy to a destination. The efficiency of the process would be improved if the conversion could be done directly using solar pumped lasers, and the possibility of making such lasers is studied. There are many applications for such lasers, and these are examined. By including the applications first, the requirements for the lasers will be more evident. They are especially applicable to the Space program, and include cases where no other methods of delivering power seem possible. Using the lasers for conveying information and surveillance is also discussed. Many difficulties confront the designer of an efficient system for power conversion. These involve the nature of the solar spectrum, the method of absorbing the energy, the transfer of power into laser beams, and finally, the far field patterns of the beams. The requirements of the lasers are discussed. Specific laser configurations are discussed. The thrust is into gas laser systems, because for space applications, the laser could be large, and also the medium would be uniform and not subject to thermal stresses. Dye and solid lasers are treated briefly. For gas lasers, a chart of the various possibilities is shown, and the various families of gas lasers divided according to the mechanisms of absorbing solar radiation and of lasing. Several specific models are analyzed and evaluated. Overall conclusions for the program are summarized, and the performances of the lasers related to the requirements of various applications.Document ID19900016992Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHarries, Wynford L.*(Old Dominion Univ. Norfolk, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1990Subject CategoryLasers And MasersReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186712NAS 1.26:186712ODU-TR-PTR-90-2Accession Number90N26308Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NSG-1568Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016992.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
From: kewiechecki@vassar.edu [mailto:kewiechecki@vassar.edu] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:26 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kevin Wiechecki 

2848 Kennedy Rd. 

Wilmington, DE 19810
Exhibit 10.9


    
      

    

     

    Exhibit
      10.9

     

    

      FIRST
        AMENDMENT TO THE

      INTERFACE,
        INC. NONQUALIFIED SAVINGS PLAN II

      


      


      THIS
        AMENDMENT
        to the
        Interface, Inc. Nonqualified Savings Plan II (the “Plan”) is made on this 28th
        day of December, 2005, by the Administrative Committee.

      


      WITNESSETH:

      


      WHEREAS,
        Interface,
        Inc. maintains the Plan for the benefit of certain of its key management
        and
        highly compensated employees; and

      


      WHEREAS,
        Section
        9.1 of the Plan provides that the Administrative Committee has the right
        to
        amend the Plan at any time; and

      


      WHEREAS,
        the
        American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 added Section 409A to the Internal Revenue
        Code of 1986, and Section 409A imposes various new requirements on nonqualified
        deferred compensation plans, such as the Plan, generally beginning on January
        1,
        2005; and

      


      WHEREAS,
        the
        Internal Revenue Service has established certain transition rules to permit
        nonqualified deferred compensation plans to come into compliance with Section
        409A (the “409A Transition Rules”); and

      


      WHEREAS,
        the
        Administrative Committee desires to amend the Plan to take advantage of certain
        of the 409A Transition Rules;

       

      NOW,
        THEREFORE,
        the Plan
        is hereby amended by adding thereto the following new Exhibit A:

      


      EXHIBIT
        A

      409A
        TRANSITION RULES

      


      In
        accordance with Q/A-20 of IRS Notice 2005-1, the following Plan participants
        were permitted to cancel or reduce their deferral elections for the 2005
        calendar year on the dates indicated below, and any amounts subject to such
        cancellation or reduction were includible in the income of the cancelling
        participant in the 2005 calendar year:

      


      1. Patrick
        Lynch on May 3, 2005

      2. Mike
        Bertolucci on May 19, 2005


      
        
           

        

        
           

          
            

          

        

        
           

        

      


      


      IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF,
        Interface, Inc. has caused its duly authorized officer to execute this Amendment
        on the date first written above.

       

       

      
        	 	
                INTERFACE,
                  INC.

                


                


                


                By:
                  /s/ Raymond S. Willoch

                Title:
                  Senior Vice President
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Farrell Dane West, * From the 350th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 9248-D.

Vs. No. 11-15-00070-CR * September 3, 2015

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
§ 299.353 Personnel qualified to supervise track restoration and renewal. Each individual designated to supervise restorations and renewals of track, shall have— ( a ) Successfully completed a course offered by the employer or by a college level engineering program, supplemented by special on-the-job training emphasizing the techniques to be employed in the supervision, restoration, and renewal of high-speed track;
( b ) Demonstrated to the railroad, at least once per calendar year, that the individual— ( 1 ) Knows and understands the requirements of this subpart that apply to the restoration and renewal of the track for which he or she is responsible;
( 2 ) Can detect deviations from those requirements; and
( 3 ) Can prescribe appropriate remedial action to correct or safely compensate for those deviations.
( c ) Written authorization from the railroad or the employer to prescribe remedial actions to correct or safely compensate for deviations from the requirements of this subpart and shall have successfully completed a recorded examination on this subpart as part of the qualification process.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday October 26, 1995 (135), Para 135.25 Reported Bill Sequentially Referred]
[Page 1797]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.135.25  reported bill sequentially referred

  Under clause 5 of rule X, the following action was taken by the 
Speaker:

       H.R. 994. The amendment recommended by the Committee on 
     Government Reform and Oversight referred to the Committee on 
     Commerce for a period not to exceed Nov. 3, 1995 for 
     consideration of such provisions of the amendment as fall 
     within the jurisdiction of that committee pursuant to clause 
     1(e), rule X.
```
# C_2004117EN.01001101.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/11

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the quality of fresh waters needing protection or improvement in order to support fish life’ (Codified version)

(COM(2004) 19 final – 2004/0002 (COD))

(2004/C 117/04)

On 29 January 2004, the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Articles 175 and 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the quality of fresh waters needing protection or improvement in order to support fish life’ (COM(2004) 19 final - 2004/0002 (COD)).

The Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment, which was responsible for preparing the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its opinion on 5 April 2004. The rapporteur was Ms Santiago.

At its 408th plenary session (meeting of 28 April 2004), the European Economic and Social Committee adopted the following opinion with 102 votes in favour and one abstention.

th

1.   Introduction

The purpose of this proposal is to undertake a codification of Council Directive 78/659/EEC of 18 July 1978 on the quality of fresh waters needing protection or improvement in order to support fish life (1). The new Directive will supersede the various acts incorporated in it (2); the proposal fully preserves the content of the acts being codified and hence does no more than bring them together with only such formal amendments as are required by the codification exercise itself.

1

2

2.   General comments

The Committee regards it as very useful to have all the texts integrated into one Directive. In the context of a People's Europe, the Committee, like the Commission, attaches great importance to simplifying and clarifying Community law so as to make it clearer and more accessible to ordinary citizens, thus giving them new opportunities and the chance to make use of the specific rights it gives them.

| 3. | It has been ensured that this compilation of provisions contains no changes of substance and serves only the purpose of presenting Community law in a clear and transparent way. The Committee expresses its total support for this objective and, in the light of these guarantees, welcomes the proposal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

It has been ensured that this compilation of provisions contains no changes of substance and serves only the purpose of presenting Community law in a clear and transparent way. The Committee expresses its total support for this objective and, in the light of these guarantees, welcomes the proposal.

Brussels, 28 April 2004.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Roger BRIESCH

---

(1)  Carried out pursuant to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council – Codification of the Acquis communautaire, COM(2001) 645 final.

1

(2)  See Annex III, Part A of the proposal.

2

---
Editorial Note on Part 381
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 381 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 381.300 What is an exemption? ( a ) An exemption is temporary regulatory relief from one or more FMCSR given to a person or class of persons subject to the regulations, or who intend to engage in an activity that would make them subject to the regulations.
( b ) An exemption provides the person or class of persons with relief from the regulations for up to 5 years, and may be renewed, upon request, for subsequent 5-year periods.
( c ) Exemptions may only be granted from one or more of the requirements contained in the following parts and sections of the FMCSRs: ( 1 ) Part 380—Special Training Requirements;
( 2 ) Part 382—Controlled Substances and Alcohol Use and Testing;
( 3 ) Part 383—Commercial Driver's License Standards; Requirements and Penalties;
( 4 ) Part 384—State Compliance with Commercial Driver's License Program;
( 5 ) Part 391—Qualifications of Drivers;
( 6 ) Part 392—Driving of Commercial Motor Vehicles;
( 7 ) Part 393—Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation;
( 8 ) Part 395—Hours of Service of Drivers;
( 9 ) Part 396—Inspection, Repair, and Maintenance (except for § 396.25); and
( 10 ) Part 399—Step, Handhold and Deck Requirements.
[63 FR 67608, Dec. 8, 1998, as amended at 81 FR 47720, July 22, 2016; 86 FR 35639, July 7, 2021]
-----Original Message----- 

From: kimandmarco@comcast.net [mailto:kimandmarco@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:19 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kimberly Grimes 

2 York Beach Mall 

Bethany Beach, DE 19930
From: awscba@rcn.com [mailto:awscba@rcn.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 7:27 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Alex Weiland 

11 Lantern Ln 

Arlington, MA 02474
----

  CLECO CORPORATION                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                EXHIBIT23(a)

  Consent of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Form S-3 (Nos. 333-109506 and 333-55656) and Form S-8 (Nos.33-10169, 33-26726, 33-38362, 33-44663, 333-44364, 333-59692 and 333-59696) of ClecoCorporation of our report dated March 14, 2005 relating to the financialstatements, management's assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears inthis Form 10-K. 

| /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP |
|---------------------------------------|
| New  Orleans, Louisiana               |
| March  14, 2005                       |

----
From: Banister, Beverly Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 4:02 PM To: director@adem.state.al.us Cc: rwg@adem.state.al.us; Gettle, Jeaneanne; Kemker, Carol; Banister, Beverly Subject: Re: August 6, 2014 letter

Hello Lance, Thank you foryour letteron August 6, 2014 regarding the upcoming PM2.5 designation decisions. This response is to clarifythat no decisions have been made at this time. The Agency is still in the process of considering the State's recommendations and evaluating the technical information for each ofthe areas. Iwill follow upwith a call to Ron to ensure that he does not have any further questions regarding this step in the process. We lookforward to continuing to work with you all duringthis designations process

. Beverly
§ 31.28 Motions. ( a ) Any application to the ALJ for an order or ruling shall be by motion. Motions shall state the relief sought, the authority relied upon, and the facts alleged, and shall be filed and served on all other parties.
( b ) Except for motions made during a prehearing conference or at the hearing, all motions shall be in writing. The ALJ may require that oral motions be reduced to writing.
( c ) Within 15 days after a written motion is served, or such other time as may be fixed by the ALJ, any party may file a response to such motion.
( d ) The ALJ may not grant a written motion before the time for filing response thereto has expired, except upon consent of the parties or following a hearing on the motion, but may overrule or deny such motion without awaiting a response.
( e ) The ALJ shall make a reasonable effort to dispose of all outstanding motions prior to the beginning of the hearing.
( f ) Except as provided by §§ 31.21(e)(3) and 31.23(f), which concern subpoenas, the filing or pendency of a motion shall not automatically alter or extend a deadline or return date.