alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: Debi Elliott [mailto:interactivebrain@indra.com] 

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:07 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Parity regulations 

I am a /licensed professional counselor/ who provides neurofeedback 

treatment to individuals with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 

and Mood Disorders. Neurofeedback is an empirically validated and widely 

recognized effective non-medication treatment for ADHD, as well as other 

conditions. There are over 50 studies evaluating the effectiveness of 

neurofeedback in the treatment of ADHD, substance use disorders and 

Autism. A recent review of this literature concluded "Neurofeedback 

meets the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry criteria 

for Clinical Guidelines for treatment of ADHD." This means that 

neurofeedback meets the same criteria as medication for treating ADHD, 

of which 60% of prescriptions are in fact prescribed "off label," and 

that neurofeedback "should always be considered as an intervention for 

this disorder by the clinician." 

 

This service has been denied by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, United 

Behavioral Health, Blue Cross, Cigna, and Amerigroup. 

 

This is limitation of an effective and validated treatment for a mental 

health problem. The reasons given by the insurance companies for this 

denial fell into two categories: 1) our company does not cover 

biofeedback for mental health problems or 2) there is not yet sufficient 

evidence for the efficacy of neurofeedback. As such, they are using 

evidence-based criteria that are far more restrictive for mental health 

services than the criteria which are used for medical/surgical services. 

There are many routine medical and surgical procedures which have far 

fewer controlled studies about their efficacy than does neurofeedback. 

These medical and surgical procedures are generally not limited because 

of concerns about how many controlled studies have been performed about 

them. 

 We believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the 

parity statute should require that employers and plans pay for the same 

range and scope of services for behavioral treatments as they do for 

medical surgical benefits and that a plan cannot be more restrictive in 

their managed care criteria and reviews for mental health and substance 

abuse disorders when compared to medical surgery. Today plans are being 

more restrictive in how they review evidenced-based mental health 

and Substance Abuse Treatments when compared to medical surgical 

treatments. This violates both the intent and letter of the parity 

statute and we hope that the regulations will clarify that this can't 

continue. 

Sincerely, 

Debora Joy Elliott 

Interactive Brain Analysis 

4885 Riverbend Rd. Suite D 

Boulder, Colorado 80304 

303 447-8443
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA velocity command stepper motor for CSI applicationThe application of linear force actuators for vibration suppression of flexible structures has received much attention in recent years. A linear force actuator consists of a movable mass that is restrained such that its motion is linear. By application of a force to the mass, an equal and opposite reaction force can be applied to a structure. The use of an industrial linear stepper motor as a reaction mass actuator is described. With the linear stepper motor mounted on a simple test beam and the NASA Mini-Mast, output feedback of acceleration or displacement are used to augment the structural damping of the test articles. Significant increases in damping were obtained for both the test beam and the Mini-Mast.Document ID19910009143Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsSulla, Jeffrey L.*(Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co. Hampton, VA., United States)*Juang, Jer-Nan*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Horta, Lucas G.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:102765NASA-TM-102765Meeting InformationMeeting: NASA/DOD CSI ConferenceLocation: Orlando, FLCountry: United StatesStart Date: November 5, 1990End Date: November 7, 1990Accession Number91N18456Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 590-14-61-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910009143.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 236.303 Control circuits for signals, selection through circuit controller operated by switch points or by switch locking mechanism.

The control circuit for each aspect with indication more favorable than “proceed at restricted speed” of power operated signal governing movements over switches, movable-point frogs and derails shall be selected through circuit controller operated directly by switch points or by switch locking mechanism, or through relay controlled by such circuit controller, for each switch, movable-point frog, and derail in the routes governed by such signal. Circuits shall be arranged so that such signal can display an aspect more favorable than “proceed at restricted speed,” only when each switch, movable-point frog, and derail in the route is in proper position.
Rule 13a-14(a) [Section 302] Certification

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Howard H. Pien, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Chiron Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     [This
section intentionally omitted];

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



|DATE: December 16, 2004 |  |                                                                       |  | 
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                        |  | /s/HOWARD H. PIENHoward H. Pien
President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
§ 24.207 General requirements—claims for relocation payments. ( a ) *Documentation.* Any claim for a relocation payment shall be supported by such documentation as may be reasonably required to support expenses incurred, such as bills, certified prices, appraisals, or other evidence of such expenses. A displaced person or person required to move temporarily must be provided reasonable assistance necessary to complete and file any required claim for payment.
( b ) *Expeditious payments.* The agency shall review claims in an expeditious manner. The claimant shall be promptly notified as to any additional documentation that is required to support the claim. Payment for a claim shall be made as soon as feasible following receipt of sufficient documentation to support the claim.
( c ) *Advanced payments.* If a person demonstrates the need for an advanced relocation payment in order to avoid or reduce a hardship, the agency shall issue the payment, subject to such safeguards as are appropriate to ensure that the objective of the payment is accomplished.
( d ) *Time for filing.* ( 1 ) All claims for a relocation payment shall be filed with the agency no later than 18 months after: ( i ) For tenants, the date of displacement or temporary move.
( ii ) For owners, the date of displacement or the date of the final payment for the acquisition of the real property, whichever is later.
( 2 ) The agency shall waive this time period for good cause.
( e ) *Notice of denial of claim.* If the agency disapproves all or part of a payment claimed or refuses to consider the claim on its merits because of untimely filing or other grounds, it shall promptly notify the claimant in writing of its determination, the basis for its determination, and the procedures for appealing that determination.
( f ) *No waiver of relocation assistance.* An agency shall not propose or request that a person waive his or her rights or entitlements to relocation assistance and benefits provided by the Uniform Act and this part. (*See* appendix A to this part, section 24.207(f).)
( g ) *Expenditure of payments.* Payments, provided pursuant to this part, shall not be considered to constitute Federal financial assistance. Accordingly, this part does not apply to the expenditure of such payments by, or for, a displaced person.
( h ) *Deductions from relocation payments.* An agency shall deduct the amount of any advance relocation payment from the relocation payment(s) to which a person is otherwise entitled. The agency shall not withhold any part of a relocation payment to a person to satisfy any other obligation.
§ 380.725 Documentation and record retention. ( a ) *Applicability.* The documentation and retention of records required by this subpart apply to entities that meet the requirements of subpart G of this part and are eligible for listing on the Training Provider Registry (TPR).
( b ) *Document retention.* All training providers on the TPR must retain the following: ( 1 ) Self-certifications by all accepted applicants for behind-the-wheel (BTW) training attesting that they will comply with U.S. Department of Transportation regulations in parts 40, 382, 383 and 391, as well as State and/or local laws, related to alcohol and controlled substances testing, age, medical certification, licensing, and driver records, as required in 380.707(a).
( 2 ) A copy of the driver-trainee's commercial learner's permit(s) or commercial driver's license, as applicable, as required in 380.707(a).
( 3 ) Instructor qualification documentation indicating driving and/or training experience, as applicable, for each instructor and copies of commercial driver's licenses and applicable endorsements held by BTW instructors or theory instructors, as applicable.
( 4 ) The lesson plans for theory and BTW (range and public road) training curricula, as applicable.
( 5 ) Records of individual entry-level driver training assessments as described in § 380.715.
( c ) *Retention of records.* Training providers listed on the TPR must retain the records identified in paragraph (b) of this section for a minimum of three years from the date each required record is generated or received, unless a record, such as a BTW instructor's CDL, has expired or been canceled, in which case the most recent, valid CDL should be retained, if applicable. The provisions of this part do not affect a training provider's obligation to comply with any other local, State, or Federal requirements prescribing longer retention periods for any category of records described herein.
[81 FR 88791, Dec. 8, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 51432, Sept. 30, 2019; 86 FR 57069, Oct. 14, 2021]
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form      10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, fully complies with      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,      2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of Benda Pharmaceutical,    Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August      23, 2010                                                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                       |   |
| /s/      Yiqing Wan                                                                        |   |
| Yiqing      WanPresident,      CEO and DirectorChief      Financial and Accounting Officer |   |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7095

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JULIEN K. DILKS, a/k/a Julien K. Modica, a/k/a Julian Modica,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District 

Judge. (7:93-cr-00091-GEC-RSB-1; 7:16-cv-81163-GEC-RSB)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julien K. Modica, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Julien K. Dilks appeals the district court’s order construing 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as a petition for a writ of 

error coram nobis and dismissing the petition based upon a 

previously issued prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by 

the district court. United States v. Dilks, Nos. 7:93-cr-00091-

GEC-RSB-1; 7:16-cv-81163-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 1, 2016). We also 

deny Dilks’ motions to make a district court transcript available 

to this court, to unseal a psychiatric report, to amend/correct 

his informal brief, and to accelerate case processing. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 10.2
                                                                    ------------





                                    AMENDMENT

                                       TO

                          SECURITIES EXCHANGE AGREEMENT



                                  BY AND AMONG

                          DEEPFIELD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

                             BEIJING SINO-US JINCHE

                   YINGANG AUTO TECHNOLOGICAL SERVICES LIMITED

                                       AND

                  THE JOINT VENTURE PARTICIPANTS NAMED HEREIN.






JANUARY 12, 2006

<PAGE>

The parties agree to amend the document as noted herein, and further agree to
have counsel conform the Securities Exchange Agreement to incorporate such
changes.

1.   All references to the Proxy Statement shall be deleted. Deep Field shall
     instead file an Information Statement or such other filing as may be
     required by law.

2.   The number of shares of Deep Field outstanding as of the date of execution
     of the agreement shall be 20,513,894 shares. The number of shares to be
     issued to the JV participants shall be 116,245,399. The total shares
     outstanding immediately after the consummation of the transaction
     contemplated herein shall be 136,759,293.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Securities
Exchange and Merger Agreement as of the date first written above.

DFT:

DEEP FIELD TECHNOLOGIES INC.

Signed:
        -------------------------------------------
Printed name: Mark Meller
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer:

Company:

BEIJING SINO-US JINCHE YINGANG AUTO
TECHNOLOGICAL SERVICES LIMITED

Signed:
        -------------------------------------------
Printed name:
Title:

JV Participants:

Signed:
        -------------------------------------------
Printed name: Wang Shanhui

Signed:
        -------------------------------------------
Printed name: Pang Liyong

Signed:
        -------------------------------------------
Printed name: Ren Bing


CHUEN KIN QUEK

MAYFLOWER AUTO GROUP LLC

Signed:
        -------------------------------------------
Printed name:
Title:
§ 211.11 Processing of petitions for rulemaking. ( a ) *General.* Each petition for rulemaking filed as prescribed in §§ 211.7 and 211.9 is referred to the head of the office responsible for the subject matter of the petition to review and recommend appropriate action to the Administrator. No public hearing or oral argument is held before the Administrator decides whether the petition should be granted. However, a notice may be published in the Federal Register inviting written comments concerning the petition. Each petition shall be granted or denied not later than six months after its receipt by the Docket Clerk.
( b ) *Grants.* If the Administrator determines that a rulemaking petition complies with the requirements of § 211.9 and that rulemaking is justified, he initiates a rulemaking proceeding by publishing an advance notice or notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register.
( c ) *Denials.* If the Administrator determines that a rulemaking petition does not comply with the requirements of § 211.9 or that rulemaking is not justified, he denies the petition. If the petition pertains to railroad safety, the Administrator may also initiate an informal safety inquiry under § 211.61.
( d ) *Notification; closing of docket.* Whenever the Administrator grants or denies a rulemaking petition, a notice of the grant or denial is mailed to the petitioner. If the petition is denied, the proceeding is terminated and the docket for that petition is closed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 179 (Monday, September 17, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 52749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4616]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 179 / Monday, September 17, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 52749]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2007-30 of August 31, 
                2007

                
Presidential Determination on Waiving Prohibition 
                on United States Military Assistance With Respect to 
                Montenegro

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Consistent with the authority vested in me by section 
                2007 of the American Servicemembers' Protection Act of 
                2002, as amended (the ``Act''), title II of Public Law 
                107-206 (22 U.S.C. 7421 et seq.), I hereby:

                <bullet> Determine that Montenegro has entered into an 
                agreement with the United States pursuant to Article 98 
                of the Rome Statute preventing the International 
                Criminal Court from proceeding against U.S. personnel 
                present in such country; and

                <bullet> Waive the prohibition of section 2007(a) of 
                the Act with respect to this country for as long as 
                such agreement remains in force.

                You are authorized and directed to report this 
                determination to the Congress and to arrange for its 
                publication in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, August 31, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-4616
Filed 9-14-07; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# Date &Time:

Tuesday February 6, 2007 at 10 a.m.

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# Status:

This meeting will be closed to the Public.

# Items to be Discussed:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration. Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# Person to Contact for Information:

                        Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer,                         *Telephone:*                         (202) 694-1220.                    

Mary W. Dove, 

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-463 Filed 1-30-07; 2:40 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1473.html[7/23/2015 11:48:10 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-xd92

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1473

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Garry Saffold

Organization: Freedom Works

General Comment

I know how to handle my own finances. I do not need this over-reaching government to tell me nor control how I

 manage or spend my hard earned money. Stay out of my retirement funds!!!