alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[EMS Letterhead]











 



RUBINCON VENTURES INC.



1313 East Maple Street



Suite 223



Bellingham, WA 98225



(360) 685-4240







 



 



March 29, 2006







 



Mr. Donald A. Wright



2655 Camino Del Rio North



Suite 450



San Diego, CA 92108







Re:Rubincon Ventures Inc.







Dear Donald:







On behalf of Rubincon Ventures Inc. (the "Company"), I am pleased to set forth in this letter our agreement regarding your compensation for serving as a member of the board of directors effective as of the date of this letter.  We are excited that you have joined the board and look forward to the contributions your expertise will give to the Company.  







A quarterly director's fee of $2,500 will be paid to you in quarterly installments, with each installment paid at the beginning of each calendar quarter, except for the first installment, which shall be pro-rated from February 15, 2006 the date you became a director, and shall be paid to you promptly.



 



You will also receive options to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock of the Company exercisable for ten years from the date of this letter for an exercise price of $1.00 per share.  Fifty percent (50%) of these options (or options to purchase 12,500 shares of common stock of the Company) will vest on March 29, 2006, the date of issuance, but shall not become exercisable until September 29, 2006 (six months thereafter), and the remaining fifty percent (50%) of the options will vest one year thereafter, on March 29, 2007.







If the foregoing sets forth your understanding of our agreement, please execute and return the attached copy of this letter.







We look forward to a long and productive association.







Very Truly Yours,







RUBINCON VENTURES, INC.







/s/Guy Peckham



By:______________________________
Guy Peckham, President







 



 



 



 







































AGREED AND ACCEPTED:



/s/ Donald A. Wright



______________________________



Donald A. Wright







Dated:March 29, 2006
#### § 33.75 Compliance conflicts.

If compliance with any provision of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, this part, or an official action would prevent a person from filling a rated order or from complying with another provision of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, this part, or an official action, the person must immediately notify the Department of Transportation for resolution of the conflict.
#### § 236.724 Circuit, shunt fouling.

The track circuit in the fouling section of a turnout, connected in multiple with the track circuit in the main track.
From: Mike Barco [mailto:MikeBarco@Roadrunner.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 10:38 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: MHPAEA

Many innocent people died because of the Disparity further exasperated by Pete Wilson’s

elimination in Medi‐Cal in the late 1990’s!!!

A world of horror..

Today NO psychiatrist in CA accepts Medicare and Medi‐Cal!!!!!!!
Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David H. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and that I, Thomas L. Redding, Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                              
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------
|                   |  | /s/ David H. Gill                            
|                   |  | David H. Gill, President and CEO             
|                   |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Thomas L. Redding                        
|                   |  | Thomas L. Redding, Sr. Vice President and CFO
|                   |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 
|                   | 
|Date: May 12, 2008 |  |
§ 244.19 Disposition. ( a ) *Standard of review.* FRA reviews an applicant's Safety Integration Plan, and any amendments thereto, to determine whether it provides a reasonable assurance of safety at every step of the transaction. In making this determination, FRA will consider whether the plan: ( 1 ) Is thorough, complete, and clear; and
( 2 ) Describes in adequate detail a logical and workable transition from conditions existing before the transaction to conditions intended to exist after consummation of the transaction.
( b ) *Approval of the Safety Integration Plan and Amendments Thereto.* FRA approves a Safety Integration Plan, and any amendments thereto, that meets the standard set forth in paragraph (a) of this section. The approval will be conditioned on an applicant's execution of all of the elements contained in the plan, including any amendments to the plan approved by FRA.
( c ) *Amendment* — ( 1 ) *By the applicant.* The applicant may amend its Safety Integration Plan, from time to time, provided it explains the need for the proposed amendment in writing to FRA. Any amendment shall take effect no earlier than 30 days after its submission to FRA, unless it is either approved or disapproved by FRA within that period. Any disapproval of an amendment shall be in accordance with the requirements prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( 2 ) *By FRA.* FRA may request an applicant to amend its approved Safety Integration Plan from time to time should circumstances warrant.
[67 FR 11604, Mar. 15, 2002, as amended at 67 FR 68045, Nov. 8, 2002]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-60506 Summary Calendar

PATRICIA SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RANKIN COUNTY, MISS., ET AL., Defendants. SHANNON SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:99-CV-449

-------------------- February 23, 2001 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Shannon Smith [“Deputy Smith”] appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity in a civil rights lawsuit brought by Patricia Smith [“Ms. Smith”]. The district court held that Deputy Smith was not entitled to qualified immunity on Ms. Smith’s claim that the officer used excessive force on her. We have jurisdiction to review the district court’s denial to the extent it turned onNo. 00-60506 -2- matters of law, including whether any issues of disputed fact are material. Colston v. Barnhart , 146 F.3d 282, 284 (5th Cir. 1998) . Our review is de novo. Lemoine v. New Horizons Ranch and Ctr., Inc. , 174 F.3d 629, 634 (5th Cir. 1999). Deputy Smith argues that he is entitled to qualified immunity because the force he administered and the injuriessuffered by Ms. Smith were de minimis. Viewing the summaryjudgment evidence in the light most favorable to Ms. Smith, as we must on this appeal, we reject Deputy Smith’s arguments. See Ikerd v. Blair , 101 F.3d 430, 434 & n.9 (5th Cir. 1996). Deputy Smith contends that his actions were reasonable under the law that was clearly established in April 1998 because no Fifth Circuit case involved a use of force like the one alleged by Ms. Smith. When, as here, the legal standard that an officer must follow was clear, it is not required that the precise action in question have been held unlawful. See Gutierrez v. City of San Antonio , 139 F.3d 441, 445 (5th Cir. 1998). AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-27-1999
<CASH>                                          14,745
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,141
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,155
<INVENTORY>                                     89,850
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               227,670
<PP&E>                                         244,287
<DEPRECIATION>                                 118,261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 472,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,475
<BONDS>                                        145,981
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,020
<OTHER-SE>                                     186,698
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   472,991
<SALES>                                        477,869
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               477,869
<CGS>                                          329,282
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  329,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   975
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,733
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,615
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,137
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,412
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,412
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.46


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 51839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4438]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--American Type Culture Collection

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 2, 2007, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), American Type Culture Collection 
(``ATCC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: American Type 
Culture Collection, Manassas, VA. The nature and scope of ATCC's 
standards development activities are: ATCC will develop consensus 
standards for biomaterials and related processes including their 
development, identification, authentication, production, storage, 
distribution and transfer. Biomaterials include, but are not limited 
to, bacteria, fungi, yeasts, cell lines, toxins, protozoa, viruses and 
molecular products such as DNA.

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-4438 Filed 9-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Allen O. Jones, Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Bancorporation of Alabama, Inc.(the “Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report basedon such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting;
27

 
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 13, 2007       /s/ Allen O. Jones, Jr.          Allen O. Jones, Jr.    Senior Vice President and CFO  
28
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–844

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 1654, THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION AUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2000

SEPTEMBER 12, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 574]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 574, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference

report to accompany H.R. 1654, the National Aeronautics and

Space Administration Authorization Act of 2000, and against its

consideration. The resolution further provides that the conference

report shall be considered as read.

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4






March 29, 2001

Mr. Adam Gurney
KINGSBRIDGE CAPITAL LIMITED
c/o Kingsbridge Corporate Services Limited
Main Street
Kilcullen, County Kildare
Republic of Ireland

Dear Adam,

Per our discussion with regards to the Private Equity Line Agreement between
Somanetics Corporation and Kingsbridge Capital Limited, we have agreed to the
following:

Upon receipt of $200,000 from Somanetics Corporation, Kingsbridge Capital agrees
to terminate 1) the Private Equity Line Agreement, 2) the related Registration
Rights Agreement and 3) Kingsbridge's right to the discount on any unsold shares
(as defined in the Agreement).

Adam, I appreciate your cooperation in this matter. If you could sign and return
a copy of this letter as acknowledgment of our Agreement for our files, I would
appreciate it. Please fax signed copy to (248) 689-4272.

Warmest regards,

/s/ Bruce J. Barrett

Bruce J. Barrett
President & CEO
Somanetics Corporation


Agreed by:/s/ Adam Gurney                             Date: April 3, 2001
          ----------------------------                      -------------


Cc:      Robert Krueger, Somanetics' Counsel
         Bill Iacona, Somanetics' Vice President of Finance
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 169 (Friday, August 31, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 50466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4278]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Special Medical Advisory Group; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Special Medical 
Advisory Group will meet on October 12, 2007 in Room 830 from 8:30 a.m. 
to 3 p.m. at VA Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Group is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs and the Under Secretary for Health on the care and treatment of 
disabled veterans, and other matters pertinent to the Department's 
Veterans Health Administration (VHA).
    The agenda for the meeting will include discussion of VHA's public 
relations campaign, an update on the budget, an update on information 
technology security, a briefing on relationships between VA and the 
Department of Defense, and an update on academic affiliations.
    Any member of the public wishing to attend should contact Juanita 
Leslie, Designated Federal Officer, Office of Administrative Operations 
(10B2), Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs 
at (202) 461-7019. No time will be set aside at this meeting for 
receiving oral presentations from the public. Statements, in written 
form, may be submitted to Juanita Leslie before the meeting or within 
10 days after the meeting.

    Dated: August 27, 2007.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-4278 Filed 8-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                         <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                       102,126
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                318,095
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (2,976)
<INVENTORY>                                  538,331
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,664,637
<PP&E>                                       1,173,775
<DEPRECIATION>                               664,801
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,240,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        968,441
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  100
<COMMON>                                     221,420
<OTHER-SE>                                   171,428
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,240,500
<SALES>                                      527,277
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             527,277
<CGS>                                        303,447
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                656,576
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,169
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           10,216
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (142,960)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 760
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (143,720)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (143,720)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.01)


</TABLE>
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 888

To amend the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act to provide for renewals of grants for permanent housing under the supportive housing program and for shelter plus care assistance to be funded through section

8 rental assistance amounts made available under the Housing Certificate

Fund of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 2001

Mr. LAFALCE (for himself, Mr. WELLER, Mr. FRANK, Mr. QUINN, Mr. SABO,

Mrs. BIGGERT, and Ms. LEE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

A BILL

To amend the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act to

provide for renewals of grants for permanent housing

under the supportive housing program and for shelter

plus care assistance to be funded through section 8 rental assistance amounts made available under the Housing

Certificate Fund of the Department of Housing and

Urban Development.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 888 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homeless Prevention

3 Permanent Housing Renewal Act of 2001’’.

4 SEC. 2. RENEWAL OF PERMANENT HOUSING GRANTS AND

5 SHELTER PLUS CARE GRANTS UNDER HOUS6 ING CERTIFICATE FUND.

7 (a) SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PROGRAM PERMANENT

8 HOUSING GRANT RENEWALS.—Section 429 of the McKin9 ney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11389) is

10 amended by adding at the end the following new sub11 section:

12 ‘‘(d) PERMANENT HOUSING GRANT RENEWALS.—

13 For fiscal year 2002 and each fiscal year thereafter, there

14 are authorized to be appropriated, from any amounts ap15 propriated under the Housing Certificate Fund account

16 of the Department of Housing and Urban Development

17 for assistance under section 8 of the United States Hous18 ing Act of 1937, such sums as may be necessary for re19 newing expiring grants under this subtitle for permanent

20 housing for homeless persons with disabilities.’’.

21 (b) SHELTER PLUS CARE GRANT RENEWALS.—Sec22 tion 463 of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act

23 (42 U.S.C. 11403h) is amended by adding at the end the

24 following new subsection:

25 ‘‘(c) GRANT RENEWALS.—For fiscal year 2002 and

26 each fiscal year thereafter, there are authorized to be ap-
3

•HR 888 IH

1 propriated, from any amounts appropriated under the

2 Housing Certificate Fund account of the Department of

3 Housing and Urban Development for assistance under sec4 tion 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, such

5 sums as may be necessary for renewing expiring grants

6 under this subtitle.’’.

Æ