alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 190
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 190 appear at 78 FR 58908, Sept. 25, 2013.

§ 190.409 Fee structure. The fee charged is based on the direct costs that PHMSA incurs in conducting the facility design safety review (including construction review and inspections), and will be based only on costs necessary for conducting the facility design safety review. “Necessary for” means that but for the facility design safety review, the costs would not have been incurred and that the costs cover only those activities and items without which the facility design safety review cannot be completed. ( a ) Costs qualifying for cost recovery include, but are not limited to— ( 1 ) Personnel costs based upon total cost to PHMSA;
( 2 ) Travel, lodging and subsistence;
( 3 ) Vehicle mileage;
( 4 ) Other direct services, materials and supplies;
( 5 ) Other direct costs as may be specified in the Master Agreement.
( b ) [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 3
                                    ---------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin
L. Cornwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

        (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.



    /s/ Kevin L. Cornwell
---------------------------------
Kevin L. Cornwell
Chief Executive Officer
August, 14, 2002
§ 237.73 Protection of bridges from over-weight and over-dimension loads. ( a ) Each track owner shall issue instructions to the personnel who are responsible for the configuration and operation of trains over its bridges to prevent the operation of cars, locomotives and other equipment that would exceed the capacity or dimensions of its bridges.
( b ) The instructions regarding weight shall be expressed in terms of maximum equipment weights, and either minimum equipment lengths or axle spacing.
( c ) The instructions regarding dimensions shall be expressed in terms of feet and inches of cross section and equipment length, in conformance with common railroad industry practice for reporting dimensions of exceptional equipment in interchange in which height above top-of-rail is shown for each cross section measurement, followed by the width of the car of the shipment at that height.
( d ) The instructions may apply to individual structures, or to a defined line segment or group(s) of line segments where the published capacities and dimensions are within the limits of all structures on the subject line segments.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-2670

___________

Clifton L. Allen, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Missouri.

United States of America, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: May 2, 2002

 Filed: May 7, 2002

___________

Before HANSEN, Chief Judge, FAGG, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a written stipulation containing waivers of the right to appeal and

to challenge his conviction or sentence in a post-conviction proceeding, Clifton L.

Allen pleaded guilty to distributing over 50 grams of a mixture or substance

containing cocaine base (crack), and possessing with intent to distribute over 50

grams of a mixture or substance containing cocaine base (crack), each in violation of

21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and punishable under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(iii). He was

sentenced to 235 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. Upon motion

by the government to enforce the appeal waiver, we previously dismissed Allen’s

direct appeal. 
1

The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Missouri.

-2-

Allen then filed the present 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The district court1

denied relief, finding that the section 2255 waiver was enforceable, but granted a

certificate of appealability on two issues: whether Allen’s trial counsel was

ineffective for failing to object to the drug’s identification as crack cocaine for

sentence-calculation purposes, and whether the trial court violated Allen’s due

process rights by not granting an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction under

U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. 

Having carefully reviewed the record, we agree with the district court that

Allen made a knowing and voluntary waiver of his right to bring a section 2255

action, cf. United States v. Michelsen, 141 F.3d 867, 871 (8th Cir.) (waiver of right

to appeal “must be the result of a knowing and voluntary decision”), cert. denied, 525

U.S. 942 (1998), and that the waiver should therefore be enforced. While “waiver of

the right to seek section 2255 post-conviction relief does not waive defendant’s right

to argue, pursuant to that section, that the decision to enter into the plea was not

knowing and voluntary because it was the result of ineffective assistance of counsel,”

see DeRoo v. United States, 223 F.3d 919, 924 (8th Cir. 2000), Allen has waived his

ineffective-assistance argument related to sentencing, see Mason v. United States,

211 F.3d 1065, 1068-69 (7th Cir. 2000) (upholding waiver of relief under section

2255 because ineffective-assistance claim related only to counsel’s performance with

respect to sentencing and did not go to validity of plea agreement itself), cert. denied,

531 U.S. 1175 (2001).

Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we

deny Allen’s pending motions.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 14th meeting of the American Health Information Community Confidentiality, Privacy, and Security Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

# DATES:

October 4, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. [Eastern].

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​confidentiality/​.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup Members will continue discussing and evaluating the confidentiality, privacy, and security protections and requirements for participants in electronic health information exchange environments.

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​cps_​instruct.html.*

Dated: September 7, 2007.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 07-4504 Filed 9-12-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
-----Original Message----- 

From: sean.wadsworth@gmail.com [mailto:sean.wadsworth@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:38 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sean Wadsworth 

533 N. State St Apt 4 

Concord, NH 03301
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, October 20, 1995 (132), Para 132.5 After Recess--6:35 P.M.]
[Page 1571]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.132.5  after recess--6:35 p.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. PETRI, called the House to order.
```
#### § 32.110 Are any of my Federal assistance awards exempt from this part?

This part does not apply to any award that the Secretary of Transportation determines that the application of this part would be inconsistent with the international obligations of the United States or the laws or regulations of a foreign government.
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128540-1 & (113)(114)(115) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

TRACY NEAL, and All Others Similarly Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Situated, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellees,

Cross-Appellants, 

v SC: 128540 

 COA: 253543 

Washtenaw CC: 96-006986-CZ 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DIRECTOR 

WILLIAM OVERTON, KENNETH McGINNIS, 

SALLY LANGLEY, JOAN YUKINS, CLARICE 

STOVALL, CAROL HOWES, ROBERT SALIS, 

CORNELL HOWARD, NANCY ZANG, JOHN

ANDREWS, JAN BALDWIN, WES BONNEY, 

DAVID CRUIKSHANK, JOSEPH DURIGON, 

WILLIAM ELLISON, CHRISTOPHER

GALLAGHER, DAVID HABITZ, EDWARD

HOOK, JACK HUTCHINS, DENNIS IFORD,

DERLE JONES, ART LANCASTER, THOMAS 

PORTMAN, ERIN RICHARDSON, RODERICK 

ROBEY, ANTHONY SIMMONS, MARTIN TATE, 

CHARLES WILLIAMS and LYNN WILLIAMS, 

Defendants-Appellants, 

Cross-Appellees,

and 

FRED WELCH, 

 Defendant.
 

NICOLE ANDERSON, and All Others Similarly 

Situated, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 128541 

 COA: 256506 

Ct of Claims: 03-000162-MZ 
 _________________________________________ 

 

2 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

DIRECTOR PATRICIA CARUSO, WILLIAM 

OVERTON and KENNETH McGINNIS, 

 Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 10, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals to 

consider defendants’ argument regarding the applicability of the Prison Litigation Reform 

Act, MCL 600.5501 et seq, to prisoners whose claims accrued after the effective date of 

the act. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is also considered, and it is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed 

by this Court. The motions to lift stay and to dismiss application are DENIED. 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

TAYLOR, C.J., not participating. 

t1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
#### § 29.201 In what circumstances should a Tribe submit a final offer?

If the Department and a Tribe are unable to agree, in whole or in part, on the terms of a compact, funding agreement, or amendment, the Tribe may submit a final offer to the Department.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 923

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from net earnings

from self-employment certain payments under the conservation reserve

program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 7, 2001

Mr. MORAN of Kansas (for himself, Mr. POMEROY, Mr. RILEY, Mr. THUNE,

Mr. GANSKE, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. MOORE, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. KIND, Mr.

ISTOOK, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois,

Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr. COMBEST, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. SESSIONS, and Mr.

KENNEDY of Minnesota) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude

from net earnings from self-employment certain payments under the conservation reserve program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PAYMENTS UNDER CONSERVATION

4 RESERVE PROGRAM EXCLUDED FROM NET

5 EARNINGS FROM SELF-EMPLOYMENT.

6 (a) INTERNAL REVENUE CODE.—Section 1402(a) of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to net earn-
2

•HR 923 IH

1 ings from self-employment) is amended by striking ‘‘;

2 and’’ at the end of paragraph (14), striking the period

3 and inserting ‘‘; and’’ at the end of paragraph (15), and

4 inserting after paragraph (15) the following new para5 graph:

6 ‘‘(16) there shall be excluded amounts received

7 as annual rental payments under section 1234 of the

8 Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3834) for

9 lands enrolled in the conservation reserve.’’.

10 (b) SOCIAL SECURITY ACT.—Section 211(a) of the

11 Social Security Act is amended by striking ‘‘; and’’ at the

12 end of paragraph (14), striking the period and inserting

13 ‘‘; and’’ at the end of paragraph (15), and inserting after

14 paragraph (15) the following new paragraph:

15 ‘‘(16) There shall be excluded amounts received

16 as annual rental payments under section 1234 of the

17 Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3834) for

18 lands enrolled in the conservation reserve.’’.

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

20 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning before,

21 on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 266.23 Record, audit, and examination. ( a ) Retention and custodial requirements for financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other records pertinent to a grant provided under this part shall be governed by Attachment C of OMB Circular A-102.
( b ) The Administrator and the Comptroller General of the United States or any of their duly authorized representatives shall, until the expiration of three years after submission to the Administrator of the grantee's final accounting of all program funds, and for any longer period necessary to resolve audit findings, have access for the purpose of audit and examination to any books, documents, papers, and records which in the opinion of the Administrator or the Comptroller General of the United States may be related or pertinent to the grants, contracts, or other arrangements arising out of, or in any way connected with, the rail service assistance program.
Exhibit 10.9
  Summary
    of Compensation for
    Non-Employee Directors and Named Executive
    Officers
  Non-Employee
    Director Compensation Summary
  Annual Retainer
      Board and Committee Meeting Fees
     Annual Stock Option Award
   Named
    Executive Officer Compensation Summary
    Name


Title

SalarySam Ferrise


President  Baldwin Filters, Inc.

$
346,000Norman Johnson


Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

$
725,000Bruce Klein


Vice President  Finance & Chief Financial Officer

$
321,000David Lindsay


Vice President  Administration & Chief
    Administrative Officer

$
193,000Richard Wolfson


Vice President  General Counsel & Corporate
    Secretary

$
250,000       Additional
    Information
#### § 29.304 May a compact be amended?

A compact may be amended at any time by the mutual written agreement of the Department and the Tribe.
§ 371.117 Must I provide individual shippers with my policies concerning cancellation, deposits, and refunds? ( a ) You must disclose prominently on your Internet website and in your agreements with prospective shippers your cancellation policy, deposit policy, and policy for refunding deposited funds in the event the shipper cancels an order for service before the date an authorized household goods motor carrier has been scheduled to pick up the shipper's property.
( b ) You must maintain records showing each individual shipper's request to cancel a shipment and the disposition of each request for a period of three years after the date of a shipper's cancellation request. If you refunded a deposit, your records must include: ( 1 ) Proof that the individual shipper cashed or deposited the check or money order, if the financial institution provides documentary evidence; or
( 2 ) Proof that you delivered the refund check or money order to the individual shipper.
[75 FR 72996, Nov. 29, 2010, as amended at 88 FR 80179, Nov. 17, 2023]
Office of Regulations and Interpretations
Employee Benefits Security Administration
Attn: Conflict of Interest Rule

Room N-5655,

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue NW

Washington D.C. 20210

Re: RIN 1210:AB32
Conflict of Interest Rule

Please accept the following as my comments for the current proposal by the Department of Labor regarding their view
ona conflict of interest rule:

There are a number of issues with the DOL’s current proposal, and additional review and feedback is necessary to
develop a more relevant and optimal rule that serves the best interest of everyone, including main street investors and
the independent financial professionals they trust for objective advice. This proposal seems to be ona fast track that is
not moving in accordance with the best interests of the retail client. Following are highlights of the additional effort
needed:

1. The effort must focus on a carefully-crafted, Universal Fiduciary Standard that is applicable to all professionals
offering personalized investment advice to retail clients; without compromising the client’s ability to choose and
obtain guidance from an advisor they trust.

2. Regulation is in this area should make it easier for investors, not harder, to seek and receive quality investment
advice that is customized for their goals.

3. Improved disclosures that add clarity and help retail clients make informed decisions without adding
unnecessary confusion — which appears to be the case in the current proposal.

4, The current proposal appears to unnecessarily restructure the securities, insurance, and banking industries —

without properly engaging the regulatory entities such as the SEC and FINRA — and overlooking redress already

in place. This proposal is far too complex to be moving so quickly as it will have far reaching unintended
consequences.

Costs related to implementation of the proposal do not appear to be properly assessed, and are understated.

The Best Interest Contract Exemption is unworkable for real life.

Fiduciary status is relevant and important at point of sale, not point of contact.

The propose grandfathering provision penalizes clients and needs to be replaced with a more workable,

conventional grandfathering clause linked to date of purchase and the applicability date of eight months is too

short and unreasonable.

PnNawM

Please reconsider these important observations for improvements, refinements, or ideally replacement of the
current proposal of a conflict of interest rule by the DOL. Many thousands of sincere, honest, hardworking
professionals in the financial industry — and their hundreds of thousands of hardworking retail clients that trust and
depend on them for financial guidance — will thank you.

Sincerely, . Mb eau
Cindy M. Sch

625 North Oaks Drive

Pella, lowa 50219
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

A.H.F., A CHILD,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D18-1148

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed April 27, 2018

Petition for Belated Appeal

A Case of Original Jurisdiction. 

Robert Wesley, Public Defender, Orlando, 

and Assistant Public Defender, Stephanie 

Nicole Osman, Orlando, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM. 

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with 

the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the March 2, 2018 dispositions

and sentences rendered in Case Nos. CJ17-3799-O and CJ17-3979-O, in the Circuit 

Court in and for Orange County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). 

PETITION GRANTED.

SAWAYA, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
REVISED



	
EXHIBIT 10.3

	 
	
REVISED

	 
	
EXHIBIT A

	 
	
to

	 
	
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

	 
	
Dated as of July 1, 2005

	 
	 
	
Name:
	Thomas L. Cole



	 	 
	
End of Term:
	June 30, 2008



	 	 
	
Revised Base Compensation:
	$900,000



	 	 
	
Effective Date of Revision:
	April 1, 2006



	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	
Thomas L. Cole
	
FEDERATED CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
§ 229.51 Aluminum main reservoirs. ( a ) Aluminum main reservoirs used on locomotives shall be designed and fabricated as follows: ( 1 ) The heads and shell shall be made of Aluminum Association Alloy No. 5083-0, produced in accordance with American Society of Mechnical Engineers (ASME) Specification SB-209, as defined in the “ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code” (1971 edition), section II, Part B, page 123, with a minimum tensile strength of 40,000 p.s.i. (40 k.s.i.).
( 2 ) Each aluminum main reservoir shall be designed and fabricated in accordance with the “ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,” section VIII, Division I (1971 edition), except as otherwise provided in this part.
( 3 ) An aluminum main reservoir shall be constructed to withstand at least five times its maximum working pressure or 800 p.s.i., whichever is greater.
( 4 ) Each aluminum main reservoir shall have at least two inspection openings to permit complete circumferential visual observation of the interior surface. On reservoirs less than 18 inches in diameter, the size of each inspection opening shall be at least that of 11 ⁄ 2-inch threaded iron pipe, and on reservoirs 18 or more inches in diameter, the size of each opening shall be at least that of 2-inch threaded iron pipe.
( b ) The following publications, which contain the industry standards incorporated by reference in paragraph (a) of this section, may be obtained from the publishers and are also on file in the Office of Safety of the Federal Railroad Administration, Washington, DC 20590. Sections II and VIII of the “ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code” (1971 edition) are published by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, United Engineering Center, 345 East 47th Street, New York, New York 10017.