alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL 
DATA SCHEDULE FOR THE FIRST QUARTER 10-Q CONAM REALTY PENSION INVESTORS L.P. 
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                       6,432,006
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               273,451
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,705,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,619,916
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,541
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,705,457
<SALES>                                        177,185
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               203,086
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               266,273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (198,879)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (198,879)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (198,879)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.84
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 325
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 325 appear at 66 FR 49869, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 325.1 Scope of the rules in this part. ( a ) The rules in this part prescribe procedures for inspection, surveillance, and measurement of motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment operated by motor carriers to determine whether those vehicles and that equipment conform to the Interstate Motor Carrier Noise Emission Standards of the Environmental Protection Agency, 40 CFR part 202.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, the rules in this part apply to motor carriers engaged in interstate commerce. The rules apply at any time or under any condition of highway grade, load, acceleration or deceleration.
( c ) The rules in this part do not apply to— ( 1 ) A motor vehicle that has a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) of 10,000 pounds (4,536 kg.) or less;
( 2 ) A combination of motor vehicles that has a Gross Combination Weight Rating (GCWR) of 10,000 pounds (4,536 kg.) or less;
( 3 ) The sound generated by a warning device, such as a horn or siren, installed in a motor vehicle, unless such device is intentionally sounded in order to preclude an otherwise valid noise emission measurement;
( 4 ) An emergency motor vehicle, such as a fire engine, an ambulance, a police van, or a rescue van, when it is responding to an emergency call;
( 5 ) A snow plow in operation; or
( 6 ) The sound generated by auxiliary equipment which is normally operated only when the motor vehicle on which it is installed is stopped or is operating at a speed of 5 miles per hour (8 kph) or less, unless such device is intentionally operated at speeds greater than 5 mph (8 kph) in order to preclude an otherwise valid noise measurement. Examples of that type of auxiliary equipment include, but are not limited to, cranes, asphalt spreaders, ditch diggers, liquid or slurry pumps, auxiliary air compressors, welders, and trash compactors.
[40 FR 42437, Sept. 12, 1975, as amended at 78 FR 58477, Sept. 24, 2013]
From: veekay@planeteria.net [mailto:veekay@planeteria.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:36 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Vickie Rozell 

1603 Hess Rd #3 

Redwood City, CA 94061
From: Cindy Rusconi [mailto:cindyrus60@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 1:01 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

PLEASE STAY AWAY FROM MY RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Do not implement this "Fiduciary Rule"!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I AM CAPABLE OF CHOOSING MY RETIREMENT FUNDS AND HOW MUCH TO SAVE 

FOR MY RETIREMENT!!!!!!!!!

Sincerely,

Cynthia Rusconi
#### § 229.64 Plain bearings.

A plain bearing box shall contain visible free oil and may not be cracked to the extent that it will leak oil.
§ 299.713 Program approval procedure. ( a ) *Submission.* Except as provided in § 299.445(a)(2), the railroad shall submit for approval an inspection, testing, and maintenance program as described in § 299.711(b) not less than 180 days prior to pre-revenue service system integration testing. The program shall be submitted to FRA in accordance with § 299.9. If the railroad seeks to amend an approved program as described in § 299.711(b), the railroad shall file with FRA in accordance with § 299.9 for approval of such amendment not less than 60 days prior to the proposed effective date of the amendment. A program responsive to the requirements of this subpart or any amendment to the program shall not be implemented prior to FRA approval.
( b ) *Contents.* Each program or amendment shall contain: ( 1 ) The information prescribed in § 299.701 for such program or amendment; and
( 2 ) The name, title, address, and telephone number of the primary person to be contacted with regard to review of the program, its content, or amendments.
( c ) *Approval.* ( 1 ) Within 90 days of receipt of the initial inspection, testing, and maintenance program, FRA will review the program. The Associate Administrator will notify the primary railroad contact person in writing whether the inspection, testing, and maintenance program is approved and, if not approved, the specific points in which the program is deficient. Deficiencies identified shall be addressed as directed by FRA prior to implementing the program.
( 2 ) FRA will review each proposed amendment to the program that relaxes an FRA-approved requirement within 45 days of receipt. The Associate Administrator will then notify the primary railroad contact person in writing whether the proposed amendment has been approved by FRA and, if not approved, the specific points in which the proposed amendment is deficient. The railroad shall correct any deficiencies as directed by FRA prior to implementing the amendment. For amendments proposing to make an FRA-approved program requirement more stringent, the railroad is permitted to implement the amendment prior to obtaining FRA approval.
( 3 ) Following initial approval of a program or amendment, FRA may reopen consideration of the program or amendment for cause stated.
( 4 ) The railroad may, subject to FRA review and approval under § 299.15, implement inspection, testing, maintenance procedures and criteria, incorporating new or emerging technology.
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2388

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade and fisheries for the vessel SHAKA MARU.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 21, 1995

Mr. LIVINGSTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade and fisheries

for the vessel SHAKA MARU.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections 12106 and 12108 of

6 title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transpor7 tation may issue a certificate of documentation with ap8 propriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise
2

•HR 2388 IH

1 trade or fisheries (or both) for the vessel SHAKA MARU

2 (United States official number 983176).

Æ
§ 238.733 Interior fixture attachment. ( a ) Tier III trainsets shall comply with the interior fixture attachment strength requirements referenced in either of the following paragraphs: ( 1 ) Section 238.233 and APTA PR-CS-S-006-98; or
( 2 ) Section 6.1.4, “Security of furniture, equipment and features,” of GM/RT2100, provided that— ( i ) The conditions of § 238.705(b)(2) are met;
( ii ) Interior fixture attachment strength is sufficient to resist without failure individually applied loads of 5g longitudinal, 3g lateral, and 3g vertical when applied to the mass of the fixture; and
( iii ) Use of the standard is carried out under any conditions identified by the railroad, as approved by FRA.
( b ) The standards required in this section are incorporated by reference into this section with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at Federal Railroad Administration, Docket Clerk, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC and is available from the sources indicated below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html*. ( 1 ) American Public Transportation Association, 1666 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006, *www.aptastandards.com*. ( i ) APTA PR-CS-S-006-98, Rev. 1, “Standard for Attachment Strength of Interior Fittings for Passenger Railroad Equipment,” Authorized September 28, 2005.
( ii ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) Rail Safety and Standards Board Ltd., Communications, RSSB, Block 2 Angel Square, 1 Torrens Street, London, England EC1V 1NY, *www.rgsonline.co.uk*. ( i ) Railway Group Standard GM/RT2100, Issue Four, “Requirements for Rail Vehicle Structures,” December 2010.
( ii ) [Reserved]
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Tristan Harriso n v. One Westfield Lake

Appellate case number: 01

- 17

- 00 150

- CV

Trial court case number: 1 088470

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County

On February 27, 2017, appellant, Tristan Harrison, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from the judgment, signed by the c ounty court on February 21, 2017, in

this eviction case. On March 22, 2017, t he Clerk of this Court sent a notice to appellant stating that, absent a record showing he was indigent, unless he paid the filing fee by April 21, 2017, this appeal was subject to dismissal

. On A pril 18 , 2017 , the county clerk filed an original clerk’s record in this Court containing, among other documents, ap p e l l a nt ’s “Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs or an Appeal Bond in Justice Court” (“Statement” ) , filed on January 19, 2017 , and the Bill of Costs notes that the clerk’s record fee was waived due

to this Statement. There was no contest or a trial court’s order regarding the Statement

. Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1 provid e s t h a t a p a r t y who fil e s such a S tatement

in the t r i a l cou r t “is not required to p a y c osts in t h e a p p e l l a te c ourt unless the tri a l c ourt

ov e r rul e d the p a r t y ’s c laim of ind i g e n c e in an order that complies with Texas Rule of

Civil Procedure 145.” T EX

. R

. A PP

. P

. 20.1 ( b) ( 1). Because appellant’s claim of indigence was uncontested and not overruled by the trial court, appellant is not required

to pay costs in this appeal. See id. Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to deem the appellant indigent and allowed to proceed without advance payment for purposes of the filing and reporter’s record fees. Finally, w e ORDER t h e county c l e rk to mail the clerk’s record to the pro se appellant within 2 0 days of the date of this Order, at no cost to appellant, and shall further certify to this Court the delivery date within 30 days of th is Order.

It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

 for the Court

Date: April 25, 2017
Exhibit 34.1


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of The Ohio Edison Company:





We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying “Report on assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Asset-Backed Securities”, that The Ohio Edison Company (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the asset-backed securities transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving phase-in recovery property (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2014 and for the year then ended , excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(i-iv), 1122(d)(2)(i-vii), 1122(d)(3)(ii-iv), and 1122(d)(4)(i-v, ix-xiii, xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform or the servicing activities are applicable to the Platform but are excluded from the scope of management's assertion and are not reported on herein.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.











/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





Cleveland, OH


March 27, 2015
§ 236.410 Locking, hand-operated switch; requirements. ( a ) Each hand-operated switch in main track shall be locked either electrically or mechanically in normal position, except: ( 1 ) Where train speeds over the switch do not exceed 20 miles per hour;
( 2 ) Where trains are not permitted to clear the main track;
( 3 ) Where a signal is provided to govern train movements from the auxiliary track to the signaled track; or
( 4 ) On a signaled siding without intermediate signals where the maximum authorized speed on the siding does not exceed 30 miles per hour.
( b ) Approach or time locking shall be provided and locking may be released either automatically, or by the control operator, but only after the control circuits of signals governing movement in either direction over the switch and which display aspects with indications more favorable than “proceed at restricted speed” have been opened directly or by shunting of track circuit.
( c ) Where a signal is used in lieu of electric or mechanical lock to govern movements from auxiliary track to signaled track, the signal shall not display an aspect to proceed until after the control circuits of signals governing movement on main track in either direction over the switch have been opened, and either the approach locking circuits to the switch are unoccupied or a predetermined time interval has expired.
Note:
Railroads shall bring all hand-operated switches that are not electrically or mechanically locked and that do not conform to the requirements of this section on the effective date of this part into conformity with this section in accordance with the following schedule: Not less than 33% during calendar year 1984. Not less than 66% during calendar year 1985. The remainder during calendar year 1986.
[33 FR 19684, Dec. 25, 1968, as amended at 49 FR 3386, Jan. 26, 1984; 75 FR 2699, Jan. 15, 2010]
§ 25.530 Marital or parental status. ( a ) *General.* A recipient shall not apply any policy or take any employment action: ( 1 ) Concerning the potential marital, parental, or family status of an employee or applicant for employment that treats persons differently on the basis of sex; or
( 2 ) Which is based upon whether an employee or applicant for employment is the head of household or principal wage earner in such employee's or applicant's family unit.
( b ) *Pregnancy.* A recipient shall not discriminate against or exclude from employment any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom.
( c ) *Pregnancy as a temporary disability.* Subject to § 25.235(d), a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, recovery therefrom, and any temporary disability resulting therefrom as any other temporary disability for all job-related purposes, including commencement, duration, and extensions of leave, payment of disability income, accrual of seniority and any other benefit or service, and reinstatement, and under any fringe benefit offered to employees by virtue of employment.
( d ) *Pregnancy leave.* In the case of a recipient that does not maintain a leave policy for its employees, or in the case of an employee with insufficient leave or accrued employment time to qualify for leave under such a policy, a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, and recovery therefrom as a justification for a leave of absence without pay for a reasonable period of time, at the conclusion of which the employee shall be reinstated to the status that she held when the leave began or to a comparable position, without decrease in rate of compensation or loss of promotional opportunities, or any other right or privilege of employment.
-----Original Message----- 

From: hlongsinnott@hotmail.com [mailto:hlongsinnott@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 2:29 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Heather Long 

7 Revere St 

Jamaica Plain, MA 02130
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals 27424 15-NOV-2011 NO. 27424 03:51 PM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I

STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. JOHN P. DUNBAR, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CR. NO. 04-1-0450(1))
ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.) Upon consideration of John P. Dunbar’s October 17, 2011 letter to the Chief Justice, which is treated as a motion for reconsideration of the February 9, 2007 order rejecting the application for a writ of certiorari, it appears that the motion for reconsideration is not authorized by HRAP 40.1(h) (“Neither acceptance nor rejection of an application for a writ of certiorari shall be subject to a motion for reconsideration in the supreme court. The rejection of an application for a writ of certiorari shall be final.”). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, November 15, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
§ 236.108 Insulation resistance tests, wires in trunking and cables. ( a ) Insulation resistance of wires and cables, except wires connected directly to track rails, shall be tested when wires, cables, and insulation are dry. Insulation resistance tests shall be made between all conductors and ground, and between conductors in each multiple conductor cable, and between conductors in trunking, when wires or cables are installed and at least once every ten years thereafter.
( b ) Then insulation resistance of wire or cable is found to be less than 500,000 ohms, prompt action shall be taken to repair or replace the defective wire or cable and until such defective wire or cable is replaced, insulation resistance test shall be made annually.
( c ) In no case shall a circuit be permitted to function on a conductor having an insulation resistance to ground or between conductors of less than 200,000 ohms during the period required for repair or replacement.
[49 FR 3384, Jan. 26, 1984]