alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regular Totals (Holders)

Airport = JFK

Season = S

Holder = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 07/01/2010 (Current & Future)

12/21/2010 08:08:51

Query Parameters:
12/21/2010 08:08:51

Carrier

Regular Totals (Holders)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held

JFK Season = SUMMER

PF7 Status Date = 07/01/2010 (Current & Future)

JFK

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 189 

AAR ASIANA AIRLINES 1 

ABX ABX AIR 1 

AEA AIR EUROPA 2 

AEW AEROSVIT AIRLINES 2 

AFL AEROFLOT 2 

AFR AIR FRANCE 12 

AIC AIR INDIA 8 

AJM AIR JAMAICA 5 

AMX AEROMEXICO 6 

ANA ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS 2 

ARA ARIK AIR 1 

AUA AUSTRIAN 2 

AVA AVIANCA 3 

AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 4 

AZA ALITALIA 6 

BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 19 

BER AIR BERLIN 2 

BWA CARIBBEAN AIRLINES 5 

CAO AIR CHINA CARGO 2 

CAY CAYMAN AIRWAYS 2 

CCA AIR CHINA 2 

CMP COPA AIRLINES 1 

COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 8 

CPA CATHAY PACIFIC 8 

CSA CZECH AIRLINES 2 

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 408 

DHL DHL 1 

DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 8 

EIN AER LINGUS 6 

ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 2 

ETD ETIHAD 2 

FDX FED EX 4 

FIN FINNAIR 2 

IBE IBERIA AIRWAYS 4 

ICE ICELANDAIR 2 

JAI JET AIRWAYS 2 

JAL JAPAN AIR LINES 3 

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 348 

KAC KUWAIT AIRWAYS 1 

KAL KOREAN AIR 3 

KLM KLM ROYAL DUTCH 4 

LAN LAN CHILE 6 

LNE LAN ECUADOR 2 

LOT LOT - POLISH AIRLINES 4 

MSR EGYPT AIR 2 

MXA MEXICANA DE AVIACION 5 

QFA QANTAS AIRLINES 2 

QTR QATAR AIRWAYS 1 

RAM ROYAL AIR MAROC 2 

RJA ROYAL JORDANIAN 2 

Page 2
12/21/2010 08:08:51

Carrier

Regular Totals (Holders)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held

JFK Season = SUMMER

PF7 Status Date = 07/01/2010 (Current & Future)

JFK

SAA SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS 2 

SCX SUN COUNTRY AIRLINES, INC. 4 

SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 2 

SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 6 

TAI TACA AIRLINES 2 

TAM TAM BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 4 

THY TURKISH AIRLINES, INC. 2 

UAE EMIRATES 4 

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 37 

UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1 

USA US AIRWAYS 16 

VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 6 

VRD VIRGIN AMERICA 19 

Page 3
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0681.html[7/21/2015 8:27:06 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-knqt

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0681

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Laura Lefevre

General Comment

I do not need you to regulate my retirement. I budget and save for myself...maybe instead of focusing on how I'm

 budgeting and preparing for retirement, you should look at all the excessive spending going on daily in the

 federal government.

Your frustrated citizen,

Laura
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1112.html[7/22/2015 11:12:45 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-cgsf

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1112

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Debra Steele

General Comment

I can manage my own retirement quite well......stay out of what's left of my own business, please!
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0505.html[7/20/2015 7:48:22 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-n87k

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0505

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Bengi Cowger

General Comment

I can plan for my own retirement. The last thing I need is more government involvement in my life. Bugger off!
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 13, 1995 (94), Para 94.30 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1132]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.94.30  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendments en bloc submitted by Mr. SANDERS:

       Page 37, line 19, strike ``$55,982,000'' and insert 
     ``$53,919,000''.
       Page 75, strike line 14 through 17, and insert ``For 
     expenses necessary for the Advisory Council on Historic 
     Preservation, $3,063.000''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

267

affirmative

Nays

130
```
§ 240.113 Individual's duty to furnish data on prior safety conduct as an employee of a different railroad. ( a ) Except for persons covered by § 240.109(h), each person seeking certification or recertification under this part shall, within 366 days preceding the date of the railroad's decision on certification or recertification: ( 1 ) Request, in writing, that the chief operating officer or other appropriate person of the former employing railroad provide a copy of that railroad's available information concerning his or her service record pertaining to compliance or non-compliance with §§ 240.111, 240.117, and 240.119 to the railroad that is considering such certification or recertification; and
( 2 ) Take any additional actions, including providing any necessary consent required by State or Federal law to make information concerning his or her service record available to that railroad.
( b ) [Reserved]
[85 FR 81310, Dec. 15, 2020]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**JAVIER ARTACHE,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 420 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 23rd day of December, 2015, the Petition for A llowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of t his matter.**
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
IN RE: SHEIKHA LATEEFAH ALSABAH, Appellant

______________________

2016

- 1788

______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 11/186,798.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

D AVID E. D OUGHERTY , Hauptman Ham, LLP, Alexa ndria, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by S EAN A. P ASSINO
, A MIR H. B EHNIA
, M ARTIN J AMES C OSENZA
, II

.

B ENJAMIN T. H ICKMAN , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by
N ATHAN K. K ELLEY
, T HOMAS W. K RAUSE
, M ONICA B ARNES L ATEEF

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN
, M AYER
, and O’M ALLEY
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

February 27, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
**Exhibit
      4**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Paul O. Richins, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.










/s/
      Paul O. Richins


Paul
      O.
      Richins


November
      5, 2007










*A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 2, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-30727

Summary Calendar

JULIAN SCOTT ESPARZA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

C.J. VALLUZO; MCDONALD’S CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Middle District of Louisiana 

(USDC No. 3:05-CV-259)

_________________________________________________________

Before REAVLEY, WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Julian Scott Esparza appeals the dismissal of his in forma pauperis (IFP) action

against his employer, the McDonald’s Corporation, and several individuals as frivolous

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) for frivolity and for failure to state a

claim, respectively. Reviewing the dismissal as frivolous for an abuse of discretion and
the dismissal for failure to state a claim de novo, Geiger v. Jowers, 404 F.3d 371, 373

(5th Cir. 2005), we affirm for the following reasons:

1. Esparza’s hand-written complaint, much like his briefing to this court,

borders on unintelligible. The magistrate judge properly conducted a

hearing to permit Esparza to explain his allegations pursuant to Spears v.

McCotter, 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985). Esparza’s explanation revealed

that he was not happy with the limited number of shift hours he was

scheduled to work as a hamburger cook, but that he had no evidence of any

guarantee of a certain number of work hours nor of any discrimination

against him on the part of McDonald’s or his supervisors. 

2. We agree with the magistrate that Esparza’s pleadings in this action and

explanation at the Spears hearing collectively fail to show that his IFP

action has an arguable basis in law or fact. Geiger, 404 F.3d at 373. 

AFFIRMED.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LEWIS P. WILLIAMS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3769

[ March 1, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I

. Bober

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 97

- 15927CF10A

.

L ew is P. Williams, Clermont, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, L EVINE and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 163 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 13, 2001.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1157) to authorize the Secretary of Commerce to provide financial 
assistance to the States of Alaska, Washington, Oregon, California, and Idaho 
for salmon habitat restoration projects in coastal waters and upland drainages, 
and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 
Points of order against consideration of the bill for failure to comply with 
clause 4(a) of rule XIII are waived. General debate shall be confined to the 
bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Resources. After 
general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 
rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 
amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 1 pursuant to clause 8 of rule 
XVIII. Each section of that amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be 
considered as read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman 
of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 
whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the 
portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of 
rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion 
of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 
the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 
may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the 
Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of a 
substitute made in order as original text. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
    Sec. 2. House Resolution 156 is laid on the table.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0678.html[7/21/2015 8:27:05 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-l9ce

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0678

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Raymond Sordelet

General Comment

I believe I should have the right to handle MY money the way I want to. It's not up to the government to handle it

 for me. I know that none of the politicians would want their money regulated so I don't want mine either!
PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

Docket: IRS-2009-0008 

Request for Information for Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: IK S-2009-0008-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Petc Domenici Mental Healt 11 Parity 

and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: IRS-2009-00q8:OO 19 

Commmt on FR Doc: # E9-09629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Dr. Robcrt Edward McCarthy 

Address: 

Myrtle Beach, SC, 

Organization: McCarthy Counseling Associates, PA 

Government Agency Type: Local 

General Comment 

Comments regarding Regulatory Guidance USCG-2007-27022 

page 19157, I1 B specific areas I and 4 

1 am a Doctoral Lcvel Mental Health Counselor in private practice who provides 

EEG biofeedback treatment tu individuals with Attmtion Dcficit Hyperactivity 

Disorder and Mood Disorders. EEG biofeedback is an empirically validated and 

widely recognized effective non medication treatment for ADHD, as well as many 

othcr cotid itiotis. That are over 50 studies evaluating the effectiveness of EEG 

biufeedback In Ihe lreatmcnt of ADHD, Substance Usc disorders and Autism. . A 

recent ret iew of this literature wncluded "EEG biol'eedback meets the American 

ilcade~ny of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry criteria for1' Clinical Guidelines "for 

treatment nf ADHD." This means that EEG biofeedback meets the same criteria 

as to tndication for treating ADHD, and that EEG biofeedback "should always he 

considered as an intarvur~tior~ for this disordcr by the clinician".'I'his service has 

been denied by Georgia Medicaid. Aetna, I Jnited Behavioral Health, Blue Crnss, 

Cigna, and Arncrigroup. This is limitation of at1 effective and validated treatment for 

a rncntal hcalth problern. The reasoris given by the insurance cornpallies for this 

d~nial fcll into two catcgorics: 1) our company does not cover biofeedback for 

Mcntal Hcalth problmns or 2) there is not yet sufficient evidence for the efficacy of 

EEG biofeedback. As such, they are using evidence-based criteria that are far 

more rcstrictivc for mcntal hcalth services than the criteria which are used for 
Page 2 of 2 

medicallsurgical scrviccs. There are many routine medical and surgical 

procedures which have far fewer controlled studies about their cfficacy ban does 

EEG biofeedback. These rncdical and surgical procedures are generally not 

lirnitod baause of wnc;ms about how many contrnlled studies havc bcm 

pwiurrned about them. 

We believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity 

stotue should rcquirc that empluyers and plans pay for the same range and 

scope of scrviccs for Behavioral Treatments as they do for Med Surg benefits and 

that a plan ann not be more restrictive in their managed care criteria and reviews Sir 

MH and SA disorders when compared to Med Surg. Today plans are being more 

restrictive in how they review evidenced bascd Mental Health and Substance 

Abuse Treatments when compared lo Med Surg treatments. This violates both the 

ultcnt and letter of tht: parity statute and we hope that the regulations wi I1 clarify 

Illat this can't continue.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 27, 1995 (121), Para 121.25 Clerk to Correct Engrossment]
[Page 1457]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.121.25  clerk to correct engrossment

  On motion of Mr. GOODLING, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That in the engrossment of the foregoing bill, the Clerk be 
authorized to make technical corrections and conforming changes to the 
bill.
```
§ 38.63 Between-car barriers. ( a ) *Requirement.* Suitable devices or systems shall be provided to prevent, deter or warn individuals from inadvertently stepping off the platform between cars. Acceptable solutions include, but are not limited to, pantograph gates, chains, motion detectors or similar devices.
( b ) *Exception.* Between-car barriers are not required where platform screens are provided which close off the platform edge and open only when trains are correctly aligned with the doors.
Regular Totals (Operators)

Airport = JFK

Season = S

Operator = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 07/01/2012 (History & Current)

02/23/2015 08:12:42

Query Parameters:
02/23/2015 08:12:42

Carrier

Regular Totals (Operators)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held

JFK Season = SUMMER

PF7 Status Date = 07/01/2012 (History & Current)

JFK

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 130 

AAR ASIANA AIRLINES 2 

ACA AIR CANADA 6 

AEA AIR EUROPA 2 

AEW AEROSVIT AIRLINES 2 

AFL AEROFLOT 4 

AFR AIR FRANCE 10 

AIC AIR INDIA 2 

AJM AIR JAMAICA 1 

AMX AEROMEXICO 9 

ANA ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS 2 

ASQ ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST/EXPRESS JET 7 

AUA AUSTRIAN 2 

AVA AVIANCA 4 

AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 4 

AZA ALITALIA 6 

BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 20 

BER AIR BERLIN 2 

BWA CARIBBEAN AIRLINES 8 

CAA ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES (code 1 

CCA AIR CHINA 1 

CES CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES 2 

CHQ CHAUTAUQUA 20 

CMP COPA AIRLINES 3 

COM COMAIR AIRLINES 37 

CPA CATHAY PACIFIC 7 

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 214 

DAT BRUSSELS AIRLINES 2 

DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 8 

EGF AMR EAGLE HOLDING COPR. (FORMERLY 52 

EIA EVERGREEN 1 

EIN AER LINGUS 4 

ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 4 

ETD ETIHAD 2 

EVA EVA AIRLINES 1 

FDX FED EX 3 

FIN FINNAIR 2 

FLG ENDEAVOR AIR (dba NORTHWEST AIRLINK 96 

HAL HAWAIIAN AIR 2 

IBE IBERIA AIRWAYS 5 

ICE ICELANDAIR 4 

ISS MERIDIAN AIRLINES 1 

JAI JET AIRWAYS 2 

JAL JAPAN AIR LINES 2 

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 322 

KAC KUWAIT AIRWAYS 1 

KAL KOREAN AIR 3 

KLM KLM ROYAL DUTCH 4 

LAN LAN AIRLINES 3 

LNE LAN ECUADOR 1 

LPE LAN PERU 1 

Page 2
02/23/2015 08:12:42

Carrier

Regular Totals (Operators)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held

JFK Season = SUMMER

PF7 Status Date = 07/01/2012 (History & Current)

JFK

MSR EGYPT AIR 2 

QFA QANTAS AIRLINES 2 

QTR QATAR AIRWAYS 3 

RAM ROYAL AIR MAROC 2 

RJA ROYAL JORDANIAN 2 

SAA SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS 2 

SCX SUN COUNTRY AIRLINES, INC. 4 

SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 2 

SVA SAUDI ARABIAN AIRLINES 2 

SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 6 

TAI TACA AIRLINES 2 

TAM TAM BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 6 

THY TURKISH AIRLINES, INC. 5 

TSO TRANSAERO AIRLINES 2 

UAE EMIRATES 4 

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 26 

UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1 

USA US AIRWAYS 10 

VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 6 

VRD VIRGIN AMERICA 20 

Page 3
#### § 29.4 How do Departmental circulars, policies, manuals, guidance, or rules apply to a Tribe's performance under the Program?

A Tribe's performance under the Program is not subject to any Departmental circular, policy, manual, guidance, or rule, except for this part, unless the Department and the Tribe otherwise negotiate and agree in the compact or funding agreement.
Exhibit 21


      The following were the registrant's subsidiaries as of December 31, 
1995, other than subsidiaries that, if considered in the aggregate
as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary
at such date:


                                            Jurisdiction
                                                 of
Name of Subsidiary                          Incorporation
------------------                          -------------
BHC Communications, Inc.                    Delaware
      BHC Network Partner, Inc.             Delaware
      Chris-Craft Television, Inc.          Delaware
            BHC Network Partner II, Inc.    Delaware
            KCOP Television, Inc.           California
            Oregon Television, Inc.         Oregon
      Pinelands, Inc.                       Delaware
      United Television, Inc.               Delaware
            UTV of San Francisco, Inc.      California
            UTV of San Antonio, Inc.        Texas
Chris-Craft Industrial Products, Inc.       Delaware