alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 375.211 Must I have an arbitration program? ( a ) You must have an arbitration program for individual shippers to resolve disputes about property loss and damage and disputes about whether carrier charges in addition to those collected at delivery must be paid. You must establish and maintain an arbitration program with the following 11 minimum elements: ( 1 ) You must design your arbitration program to prevent you from having any special advantage in any case where the claimant resides or does business at a place distant from your principal or other place of business.
( 2 ) Before execution of the bill of lading, you must provide notice to the individual shipper of the availability of neutral arbitration, including all three of the following items: ( i ) A summary of the arbitration procedure.
( ii ) Any applicable costs.
( iii ) A disclosure of the legal effects of election to use arbitration.
( 3 ) Upon the individual shipper's request, you must provide information and forms you consider necessary for initiating an action to resolve a dispute under arbitration.
( 4 ) You must require each person you authorize to arbitrate to be independent of the parties to the dispute and capable of resolving such disputes, and you must ensure the arbitrator is authorized and able to obtain from you or the individual shipper any material or relevant information to carry out a fair and expeditious decisionmaking process.
( 5 ) You must not charge the individual shipper more than one-half of the total cost for instituting the arbitration proceeding against you. In the arbitrator's decision, the arbitrator may determine which party must pay the cost or a portion of the cost of the arbitration proceeding, including the cost of instituting the proceeding.
( 6 ) You must refrain from requiring the individual shipper to agree to use arbitration before a dispute arises.
( 7 ) Arbitration must be binding for claims of $10,000 or less, if the individual shipper requests arbitration.
( 8 ) Arbitration must be binding for claims of more than $10,000, if the individual shipper requests arbitration and the carrier agrees to it.
( 9 ) If all parties agree, the arbitrator may provide for an oral presentation of a dispute by a party or representative of a party.
( 10 ) The arbitrator must render a decision within 60 days of receipt of written notification of the dispute, and a decision by an arbitrator may include any remedies appropriate under the circumstances.
( 11 ) The arbitrator may extend the 60-day period for a reasonable period if you or the individual shipper fail to provide, in a timely manner, any information the arbitrator reasonably requires to resolve the dispute.
( b ) You must produce and distribute a concise, easy-to-read, accurate summary of your arbitration program, including the items in this section.
[68 FR 35091, June 11, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 10575, Mar. 5, 2004; 72 FR 36772, July 5, 2007; 87 FR 24446, Apr. 26, 2022]
**Exhibit 24.12**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS** that I, **John W. Rogers, Jr.**do hereby appoint JohnW. Rowe and William A. Von Hoene, Jr., or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2008 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto,to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**John W. Rogers, Jr.**

**DATE: January 27, 2009**
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0574.html[7/20/2015 9:22:32 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-67xt

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0574

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Kristin McMurray

General Comment

The government should not control how I spend my 401k.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0879.html[7/21/2015 5:04:01 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-uqq7

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0879

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I'm smart enough to plan/take care of my own retirement. I don't need the federal government involved.
Placeholder for the complete docket from the 2009 Final Rule 

Docket Number EPA‐HQ‐OAR‐2008‐0496 available at 

http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;dct=FR+PR+N+O+SR;rpp=10;po=0;D=EPA‐HQ‐OAR‐2008‐0496
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 21(CEC)







                           LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                           --------------------
                                    OF
                                    --
                       CENTERIOR ENERGY CORPORATION
                       ----------------------------




         The subsidiaries of Centerior Energy Corporation, all wholly owned, are
         The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, The Toledo Edison Company,
         Centerior Service Company, Centerior Properties Company, Centerior
         Enterprises Company and Market Responsive Energy, Inc. All those
         subsidiaries are incorporated under the laws of the State of Ohio and
         do not do business under any names other than those listed above,
         except that The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company does business
         under the trade name The Illuminating Company.



















March 26, 1997
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                     OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Norman E. Johnson, the Chief Executive Officer of CLARCOR Inc., certify that
(i) the Form 10-K Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Form 10-K Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CLARCOR Inc.

                                                 /s/ NORMAN E. JOHNSON
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                    Norman E. Johnson
                                             Chairman of the Board, President
                                               and Chief Executive Officer
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2467

To grant certain patent rights for certain nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory

drugs for a 2-year period.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 11, 1995

Mr. HASTERT (for himself, Mr. PORTER, Mrs. COLLINS of Illinois, Mr. RUSH,

and Mr. NORWOOD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on

Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker,

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To grant certain patent rights for certain nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs for a 2-year period.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GRANTING CERTAIN PATENT RIGHTS RELAT4 ING TO CERTAIN DRUGS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Any owner on the date of enact6 ment of this Act of the right to market a nonsteroidal anti7 inflammatory drug that—

8 (1) contains a previously patented active agent;
2

•HR 2467 IH

1 (2) has been reviewed by the Federal Food and

2 Drug Administration for a period of more than 120

3 months as a new drug application; and

4 (3) was approved as safe and effective by the

5 Federal Food and Drug Administration on October

6 29, 1992,

7 shall be entitled, for the 2-year period beginning on Octo8 ber 29, 1997, to exclude others from making, using, offer9 ing for sale, selling, or importing into the United States

10 such active agent, in accordance with section 154(a)(1)

11 of title 35, United States Code.

12 (b) INFRINGEMENT.—Section 271 of title 35, United

13 States Code shall apply to the infringement of the entitle14 ment provided under subsection (a). No application de15 scribed in section 271(e)(2)(A) of title 35, United States

16 Code, regardless of purpose, may be submitted prior to

17 the expiration of the entitlement provided under sub18 section (a).

19 (c) NOTIFICATION.—Not later than 30 days after the

20 date of the enactment of this Act, any owner granted an

21 entitlement under subsection (a) shall notify the Commis22 sioner of Patents and Trademarks and the Secretary for

23 Health and Human Services of such entitlement. Not later

24 than 7 days after the receipt of such notice, the Commis-
3

•HR 2467 IH

1 sioner and the Secretary shall publish an appropriate no2 tice of the receipt of such notice.

Æ
EXHIBIT 10.25

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                                SERVICE 1ST BANK
                          SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT
                            DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2003
                                       FOR
                                 PATRICK CARMAN


         THIS AMENDMENT is adopted this 8th day of August, 2005, by and between
SERVICE 1ST BANK, a state-chartered commercial bank located in Stockton,
California (the "Company") and PATRICK CARMAN (the "Executive").

         The Company and the Executive executed the Salary Continuation
Agreement on September 10, 2003 (the "Agreement").

         The undersigned hereby amends, in part, said Agreement for the purpose
of changing the Plan Year and increasing the Normal Retirement Benefit.
Therefore, the following change shall be made:

         Article 1.18 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and
         replaced by Article 1.18 below.

1.19     Plan Year" means each twelve-month period commencing on January 1 and
         ending on December 31 of each year.

         Article 2.1.1 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and
         replaced by Article 2.1.1 below.

         2.1.1    Amount of Benefit. The annual Normal Retirement Benefit under
                  this Section 2.1 is Seventy-Seven Thousand Dollar ($77,000).


         The Schedule A attached to the Agreement shall also be amended in its
entirety and replaced with the new Schedule A attached to this Amendment.

         IN WITNESS OF THE ABOVE, the Executive and the Company hereby consent
to this First Amendment.


Executive:                                  SERVICE 1ST BANK

/s/ PATRICK CARMAN                          By     /s/ JOHN O. BROOKS
----------------------------------                 -----------------------------
Patrick Carman                                     John O. Brooks

                                            Title  Chairman
                                                   -----------------------------


                                      101
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0710.html[7/21/2015 10:00:32 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-p10e

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0710

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I am smart and you need to leave my retirement money alone.

Americans can handle their on money.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 231 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 231

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the deduction for 
               medical expenses incurred for an abortion.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Dornan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the deduction for 
               medical expenses incurred for an abortion.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DENIAL OF MEDICAL EXPENSE DEDUCTION FOR ABORTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (d) of section 213 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to medical, dental, etc., expenses) is 
amended by adding at the end thereof the following new paragraph:
            ``(10) Abortions.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The term `medical care' shall 
                not include any procedure which takes the life on a 
                preborn child.
                    ``(B) Exception.--Subparagraph (A) shall not apply 
                to any procedure required to prevent the death of 
                either the pregnant woman or her preborn child so long 
                as every reasonable effort is made to preserve the life 
                of each.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1995.

                                 <all>
```
#### § 30.1 Purpose.

The rules in this part implement section 109(a) of the Continuing Resolution on the Fiscal Year 1988 Budget, Public Law No. 100-202 (signed December 22, 1987) [the Continuing Resolution], and section 115 of the Airport and Airways Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1987, Public Law No. 100-223 (signed December 30, 1987) [the Airport Safety Act]. These rules are intended to give uniform implementation to these statutes throughout DOT procurement and grant programs.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

VANESSA B. CHAUVIN; LORIANN )

CHAUVIN; and DAVID B. CHAUVIN, )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2591

)

SCHOOL BOARD OF PINELLAS )

COUNTY, a Florida governmental entity ) 

and JANE DOE, a minor by and through )

her parents and natural guardians, M.D. )

and P.D., )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed September 13, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Jack R. St. Arnold, Judge.

Hannah E. Austin and Michael V. Laurato of 

Austin & Laurato, P.A., Tampa, for 

Appellants.

DeeAnn J. McLemore and Charles W. Hall 

of Banker Lopez Gassler P.A., St. 

Petersburg, for Appellee School Board of 

Pinellas County.

No appearance for Appellee Jane Doe.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

BLACK, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
#### Robert Diers et al., appellees, v. Charles F. Ahrendt, appellant.

Filed November 1, 1918.

No. 19732.

Appeal from the district court for Dodge county: George II. Thomas, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Cain <&*Mapes, for appellant.

*Franh Doleml, contra.*

Cornish, J.

This case involves a strip of ground, 20 feet wide, running from the northwest corner of the plaintiffs’ land a half mile south to the public highway, partly located upon plaintiffs’ quarter section. The strip is claimed to be a public highway, and would be a continuation of the disputed road, the subject of controversy in *Burk v. Diers,*p. 721, *post.*The facts in these two cases are substantially the same, except that in the instant case the road in dispute is along a section line, and there is some evidence that at one time the father of the defendant, when road overseer, did some *721work upon it. These facts, however, should not. alter the conclusion arrived at. On the west' and south sides of defendant’s quarter section are established' public highways, and there is no need of a public highway at this point. If defendant’s father, as ,road overseer, did any work upon this road, it would hardly he notice to the plaintiffs that the public was claiming a right in it. Defendant’s father lived-immediately to the east of plaintiffs, and the evidence shows that they wanted this road for communication between the two .farms. It is not shown that plaintiff Robert Diers knew of the work being done. He swears he did not. If he had seen Ahrendt, Sr., working on the road, he would naturally have thought that he was doing it for his own convenience.

• The trial court found for the- plaintiffs- in this ease, and we are of opinion that its judgment should be

Affirmed.'

Morrissey, C. J., dissents.

Rose, J., not sitting.
The following  were the  registrant's  subsidiaries  as of December 31,
1998, other than  subsidiaries  that, if considered in the aggregate as a single
subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary at such date:


Name of Subsidiary                                               Jurisdiction
                                                                      of
                                                                Incorporation


BHC Communications, Inc.                                           Delaware

         Chris-Craft Television, Inc.                              Delaware

                  BHC Network Partner, Inc.                        Delaware

                  BHC Network Partner II, Inc.                     Delaware

                  BHC Network Partner III, Inc.                    Delaware

                  KCOP Television, Inc.                            California

                  Oregon Television, Inc.                          Oregon

         Pinelands, Inc.                                           Delaware

         United Television, Inc.                                   Delaware

                  UTV of San Francisco, Inc.                       California

                  UTV of San Antonio, Inc.                         Texas

                  UTV of Baltimore, Inc.                           Delaware

                  United Television Sales, Inc.                    Delaware

Chris-Craft Industrial Products, Inc.                              Delaware
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0610.html[7/21/2015 7:04:58 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-pjc9

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0610

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Burnis Thrash

General Comment

We the people have been given the right to elect our officials and to replace them when elections are held. We

 have made quite a few mistakes electing people who do not serve our best interests because they have been

 given power and now think they know what is best for the constituents they represent. We do not need

 government regulation or dictation of our retirement systems. People were given the right to choose by God in

 what they believe so we may make some mistakes along the way but it should remain our right to plan for our

 own welfare and retirements. the government already regulates the Social Security Administration and that is

 enough government regulation of our retirement years. Please do not further infringe upon our rights and take us

 further down the road to Socialism!!!
Exhibit
10.31

June 15, 2005

John W.
Henry & Company, Inc.
 301 Yamato Road, Suite 2200
 Boca
Raton, Fl. 33431-4931

Attn: Mr. Ken Webster

Re:    Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mr.
Webster:

We are writing with respect to your management
agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made
below (the "Management Agreements"). We are
extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2006
and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain
unchanged.

		
	• 	Shearson Mid-West Futures
Fund


		
	• 	Shearson Lehman Select Advisors
Futures Fund L.P.


		
	• 	Smith Barney Mid-West
Futures Fund L.P. II


		
	• 	Smith Barney
Westport Futures Fund L.P.


		
	• 	Hutton
Investors Futures Fund, L.P. II (HIFF
II)


		
	• 	AURORA
2001


		
	• 	AURORA
III


		
	• 	Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund
L.P.


		
	• 	Salomon Smith Barney Diversified
2000 Futures Fund L.P.


		
	• 	Alera
100


		
	• 	JWH Strategic Allocation Master
Fund LLC


Please acknowledge receipt of this modification
by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of
Mr. Daniel McAuliffe at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If
you have any questions I can be reached at 212-559-5043.

Very truly yours,

CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES
LLC

		
	By: 	/s/ Daniel R.
McAuliffe, Jr.

Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
 Chief Financial
Officer & Director


JOHN W. HENRY &
COMPANY, INC.

		
	By: 	/s/
Kenneth S. Webster


Print
Name:    Kenneth S. Webster


DRMcA/sr