alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 191.5 Immediate notice of certain incidents. ( a ) At the earliest practicable moment following discovery, but no later than one hour after confirmed discovery, each operator must give notice in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section of each incident as defined in § 191.3.
( b ) Each notice required by paragraph (a) of this section must be made to the National Response Center either by telephone to 800-424-8802 (in Washington, DC, 202 267-2675) or electronically at *http://www.nrc.uscg.mil* and must include the following information: ( 1 ) Names of operator and person making report and their telephone numbers.
( 2 ) The location of the incident.
( 3 ) The time of the incident.
( 4 ) The number of fatalities and personal injuries, if any.
( 5 ) All other significant facts that are known by the operator that are relevant to the cause of the incident or extent of the damages.
( c ) Within 48 hours after the confirmed discovery of an incident, to the extent practicable, an operator must revise or confirm its initial telephonic notice required in paragraph (b) of this section with an estimate of the amount of product released, an estimate of the number of fatalities and injuries, and all other significant facts that are known by the operator that are relevant to the cause of the incident or extent of the damages. If there are no changes or revisions to the initial report, the operator must confirm the estimates in its initial report.
[Amdt. 191-4, 47 FR 32720, July 29, 1982, as amended by Amdt. 191-5, 49 FR 18960, May 3, 1984; Amdt. 191-8, 54 FR 40878, Oct. 4, 1989; 75 FR 72905, Nov. 26, 2010; Amdt. 191-25, 82 FR 7997, Jan. 23, 2017]
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 885

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income

certain scholarships related to health professions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 2001

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude

from gross income certain scholarships related to health

professions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 885 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS RECEIVED

2 UNDER THE NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE

3 CORPS SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM, THE F. ED4 WARD HEBERT ARMED FORCES HEALTH PRO5 FESSIONS SCHOLARSHIP AND FINANCIAL AS6 SISTANCE PROGRAM, AND CERTAIN OTHER

7 PROGRAMS.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 117(c) of the Internal

9 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to the exclusion from

10 gross income amounts received as a qualified scholarship)

11 is amended—

12 (1) by striking ‘‘Subsections (a)’’ and inserting

13 the following:

14 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para15 graph (2), subsections (a)’’, and

16 (2) by adding at the end the following new

17 paragraph:

18 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTIONS.—Paragraph (1) shall not

19 apply to any amount received by an individual

20 under—

21 ‘‘(A) the National Health Service Corps

22 Scholarship program under section

23 338A(g)(1)(A) of the Public Health Service

24 Act,

25 ‘‘(B) the Armed Forces Health Professions

26 Scholarship and Financial Assistance program
3

•HR 885 IH

1 under subchapter I of chapter 105 of title 10,

2 United States Code,

3 ‘‘(C) the National Institutes of Health Un4 dergraduate Scholarship program under section

5 487D of the Public Health Service Act, or

6 ‘‘(D) any State program determined by the

7 Secretary to have substantially similar objec8 tives as such programs.’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATES.—

10 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para11 graph (2), the amendments made by subsection (a)

12 shall apply to amounts received in taxable years be13 ginning after December 31, 1993.

14 (2) STATE PROGRAMS.—Section 117(c)(2)(D)

15 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as added by

16 the amendments made by subsection (a)) shall apply

17 to amounts received in taxable years beginning after

18 December 31, 2001.

Æ
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 31, 1995 (137), Para 137.30 Additional Sponsors]
[Page 1822]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.137.30  additional sponsors

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were added to public bills and 
resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 28: Mr. Stockman and Mr. Blute.
       H.R. 228: Mr. Stupak.
       H.R. 325: Mr. Boehlert.
       H.R. 789: Mr. Watts of Oklahoma.
       H.R. 891: Ms. Norton and Mr. Hilliard.
       H.R. 911: Mr. Foley, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Hoke, Mr. Talent, Mr. 
     Poshard, and Mr. Frazer.
       H.R. 941: Mr. DeFazio.
       H.R. 958: Mr. Matsui, Mr. Traficant, Mr. Cramer, Mr. 
     Torkildsen, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. Lazio of New York, Mr. 
     Durbin, and Mr. Torres.
       H.R. 963: Mr. Rose and Mr. Hoke.
       H.R. 969: Mr. Ackerman.
       H.R. 1619: Mr. Kasich.
       H.R. 1690: Mr. Matsui, Mr. English of Pennsylvania, Mr. Sam 
     Johnson, Mr. Zimmer, Mr. Stupak, and Mr. Engel.
       H.R. 1733: Mr. Smith of Texas, Mrs. Lowey, and Mr. Hinchey.
       H.R. 1748: Mrs. Thurman.
       H.R. 1947: Mr. Shays.
       H.R. 1955: Mrs. Thurman.
       H.R. 2019: Mr. Bonilla and Mr. Burton of Indiana.
       H.R. 2024: Mr. Greenwood and Mr. Lightfoot.
       H.R. 2071: Mr. Matsui.
       H.R. 2098: Mr. Salmon, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. English of 
     Pennsylvania, and Mr. Greenwood.
       H.R. 2166: Mr. Stockman, Mr. Luther, Mrs. Chenoweth, and 
     Ms. Kaptur.
       H.R. 2190: Mr. Klink, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Royce, Mr. Cremeans, 
     Mrs. Myrick, and Mr. Quillen.
       H.R. 2240: Mr. Payne of New Jersey.
       H.R. 2276: Mr. Franks of New Jersey and Mr. Brewster.
       H.R. 2416: Mr. Ramstad, Ms. Molinari, Mr. Fox of 
     Pennsylvania, Mr. Hilleary, Mr. Lipinski, and Mr. Foley.
       H.R. 2420: Mr. Frost, Mr. Fattah, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Manton, 
     and Mr. Towns.
       H.R. 2472: Mr. Diaz-Balart, Mrs. Roukema, and Mr. Torres.
       H.R. 2476: Mr. Barrett of Wisconsin and Mr. Gene Green of 
     Texas.
       H.R. 2506: Mr. Payne of Virginia and Mr. Durbin.
       H.R. 2535: Mr. Jones, Mr. Funderburk, Mrs. Chenoweth, Mr. 
     Baker of California, Mr. Pombo, and Mr. Bono.
       H.R. 2540: Mr. Dornan, Mr. Barr of Georgia, Mr. Salmon, Mr. 
     Bunn of Oregon, Mr. Traficant, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. 
     Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Mica, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Herger, 
     Mr. Bryant of Tennessee, Mr. Taylor of North Carolina, Mr. 
     Duncan, and Mr. Pombo.
       H.J. Res. 114: Mr. Jacobs.
       H. Con. Res. 50: Ms. Furse.
```
Exhibit 32



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, David H. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Thomas L. Redding, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David H. GillDavid H. Gill, President and C.E.O.(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Thomas L. ReddingThomas L. Redding, C.F.O.(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




Date: November 4, 2005



22
§ 229.9 Movement of non-complying locomotives. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), § 229.125(g), and § 229.131(b) and (c)(1), a locomotive with one or more conditions not in compliance with this part may be moved only as a lite locomotive or a dead locomotive after the carrier has complied with the following: ( 1 ) A qualified person shall determine— ( i ) That it is safe to move the locomotive; and
( ii ) The maximum speed and other restrictions necessary for safely conducting the movement;
( 2 ) ( i ) The engineer in charge of the movement of the locomotive shall be notified in writing and inform all other crew members in the cab of the presence of the non-complying locomotive and the maximum speed and other restrictions determined under paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section.
( ii ) A copy of the tag described in paragraph (a)(3) of this section may be used to provide the notification required by paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section.
( 3 ) A tag bearing the words “non-complying locomotive” and containing the following information, shall be securely attached to the control stand on each MU or control cab locomotive and to the isolation switch or near the engine start switch on every other type of locomotive— ( i ) The locomotive number;
( ii ) The name of the inspecting carrier;
( iii ) The inspection location and date;
( iv ) The nature of each defect;
( v ) Movement restrictions, if any;
( vi ) The destination; and
( vii ) The signature of the person making the determinations required by this paragraph.
( b ) A locomotive that develops a non-complying condition enroute may continue to utilize its propelling motors, if the requirements of paragraph (a) are otherwise fully met, until the earlier of— ( 1 ) The next calendar day inspection, or
( 2 ) The nearest forward point where the repairs necessary to bring it into compliance can be made.
( c ) A non-complying locomotive may be moved lite or dead within a yard, at speeds not in excess of 10 miles per hour, without meeting the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section if the movement is solely for the purpose of repair. The carrier is responsible to insure that the movement may be safely made.
( d ) A dead locomotive may not continue in use following a calendar day inspection as a controlling locomotive or at the head of a train or locomotive consist.
( e ) A locomotive does not cease to be a locomotive because its propelling motor or motors are inoperative or because its control jumper cables are not connected.
( f ) Nothing in this section authorizes the movement of a locomotive subject to a Special Notice for Repair unless the movement is made in accordance with the restrictions contained in the Special Notice.
( g ) Paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section shall not apply to sanitation conditions covered by §§ 229.137 and 229.139. Sections 229.137 and 229.139 set forth specific requirements for the movement and repair of locomotives with defective sanitation compartments.
[45 FR 21109, Mar. 31, 1980, as amended at 61 FR 8887, Mar. 6, 1996; 67 FR 16050, Apr. 4, 2002; 72 FR 59223, Oct. 19, 2007]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DEWITT JOHNSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 42 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner is:

Did not the Superior Court, in a published opinion, misapply 18 Pa.C.S.§112 

in such a way as to conflict with precedent from both the Superior Court and 

this Court?
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of 
Bell Atlantic-Washington, D.C., Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 33-53234) and Form 
S-3 (File No. 333-464781) of our report dated February 9, 1999, on our audits of
the financial statements and financial statement schedule of the Company as of 
December 31, 1998 and December 31, 1997, and for each of the three years in the 
period ended December 31, 1998, which report is included in this Annual Report 
on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


New York, New York
March 29, 1999
ACCEPTED

12-15-00030-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

3/20/2015 4:20:06 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/20/2015 4:20:06 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
EXHIBIT 23.2




                           PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




          We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-62450 and 33-65156) of Pennsylvania
Power Company of our report dated February 28, 2003 relating to the financial
statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Stockholders, which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 28, 2003 relating to the
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 24, 2003
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, August 1, 1995 (106), Para 106.17 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 1555]
[Page 1237]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.106.17  providing for the consideration of h.r. 1555

  Mr. LINDER, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. 
No. 104-223) the resolution (H. Res. 207) providing for consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 1555) to promote competition and reduce regulation in 
order to secure lower prices and higher quality services for American 
telecommunications consumers and encourage the rapid deployment of new 
telecommunications technologies.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Avatar Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert C. Shreve,
      President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





**Dated:
              May 20, 2008**
            AVATAR
              SYSTEMS,
              INCBy:
            /s/ Robert
              C.
              ShreveRobert
                C. Shreve
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              Chief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ESMERALDA CARBALLO RAMIREZ,

Petitioner,

v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,
Respondent. No. 16

- 71083
Agency No. A061

- 141

- 792

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

S ubmitted December 18, 2017 **

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges

. Esmeralda Carballo Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal
from an immigration judge’s removal order, and denying her motion to remand.
We have jurisdiction und er 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

denial of a motion to remand, and review de novo constitutional claims

. Vargas

-

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 71083

Hernandez v. Gonzales , 497 F.3d 919, 923, 921 (9th Cir. 2007)

. We review for
substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Tamang v. Holder , 598 F.3d
1083, 1088 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Carballo Ramirez’s motion

to remand based on ineffective assistance of counsel, where she failed to establish
prejudice resulting from her prior attorney’s alleged ineffective assistance. See

Mohammed v. Gonzales
, 400 F.3d 785, 793

- 94 (9th Cir. 2005) (to prevail on an
ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a petitioner must demonstrate that
counsel’s performanc e may have affected the outcome of the proceedings).
To the extent Carballo Ramirez challenges the agency’s finding of
removability, substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that she is
removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i), where she know ingly assisted
another alien in seeking entry into the United States in violation of the law. See

Altamirano v. Gonzales , 427 F.3d 586, 592 (9th Cir. 2005) (requiring an
affirmative act of assistance in order to establish alien smuggling) . Carballo

Ramirez did not demonstrate that her statements to immigration officials at the

border were inaccurate or obtained by coercion. See Espinoza v. INS , 45 F.3d 308,
310 (9th Cir. 1995) (t he sole test for admission of evidence is whether the evidenc e
is probative and its admission is fundamentally fair ; information on an3 16

- 71083

authenticated immigration form is presumed to be reliable in the absence of
evidence to the contrary presented by the alien)

. In light of our disposition, we do not reach Carballo Ramirez ’s remaining
contentions regarding whether prior counsel erred and the necessity of complying
with the requirements of Matter of Lozada
, 19 I. & N. Dec. 637 (BIA 1988). See
Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts and agencie s are
not required to decide issues unnecessary to the results they reach).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# ~...• July 29, 2013 Shaun McGrath Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 Dear Mr. McGrath: 

### D EPA R

TMENTo f 

### E NVIRO N M E

NT and N AT URA LR ESOURC E

S PMB 2020 JOE FOS SBUILDING 523 EAST CAPITOL PIERRE, SOUTH DAKOTA 57501-3182 denr.sd.gov

_ 1or • J..._ \. 

# Arx**~** 

## len; '--

# \9r

. J

The Secretary ofthe Department ofEnvironment and Natural Resources (DENR) has been delegated by the Governor of South Dakota as his designee for the Air Quality Program in South Dakota. In that capacity, I am amending South Dakota's Air Quality Program. The Board of Minerals and Environment approved changes to South Dakota's Air Quality Program during a public hearing on May 16, 2013. The changes were approved by the Interim Rules Committee on June 4, 2013, and were effective on June 25, 2013. I have enclosed a copy ofAdministrative Rules of South Dakota, Article 74:36- Air Pollution Control Program, which you should use to replace EPA's current version, and supporting documentation to demonstrate the rules were revised in accordance with South Dakota's procedures for adopting rules. In addition, the final rule is available on South Dakota's webpage at: http:/ /legis. state.sd.us/rules/DisplayRule.aspx?Rule=74:3 6 DENR has and will continue to have adequate resources to implement and enforce South Dakota's Air Quality Program. I want to thank you in advance for your favorable consideration ofthese requests. Please have your staff contact Kyrik Rombough at (605) 773-3151, ifthere are any questions. Sincerely,



### -

# ~~/:}: Steven M. Pirner 

# --r Secretary Enclosures
###### Editorial Note on Part 384

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 384 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 384.205 CDLIS information.

Before issuing a CLP or a CDL to any person, the State must, within the period of time specified in § 384.232, perform the check of the Commercial Driver's License Information System (CDLIS) in accordance with § 383.73(b)(3)(ii) of this subchapter, and, based on that information, issue the license or, in the case of adverse information, promptly implement the disqualifications, licensing limitations, denials, and/or penalties that are called for in any applicable section(s) of this subpart.

[76 FR 26894, May 9, 2011]
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/18/15 8:52 PM

Received: July 17, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k17-95t7

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2517

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: John Macholz

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan my own retirement stop messing with our liberty
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 113 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 24, 2001.
Whereas in order to promote non-violence, respect and responsibility, the 
        students of Challenger Middle School in Lake Los Angeles, California, in 
        conjunction with the Museum of Tolerance in Los Angeles, hold each year 
        an ``Increase the Peace Day'' program on April 20; and
Whereas as part of the program, students signed the following pledge:
            ``I will honor the memory of the victims of school violence by 
        committing myself to finding a peaceful solution to my own conflicts 
        with others.
            ``I will not hit another person for any reason.
            ``I will not threaten another person, even as a joke.
            ``I will report all rumors of violence to the nearest adult and to 
        all adults who will listen to me.
            ``I will smile at students I don't know when I make eye contact.
            ``I will talk to my parents about what takes place in school.
            ``I will remind myself and others that the diversity of the United 
        States is one of our main strengths.
            ``I will be aware that I have choices in life and that I am 
        responsible for my own actions.
            ``I will be considerate of other people and their feelings.
            ``I will not spread rumors.
            ``I will not call other people names that are hurtful to them.
            ``I will help make the world a better place one smile at a time.
            ``I will ask for help when I am confused or lonely.
            ``I will make others aware of these pledges in order to spread this 
        message of peace.
            ``I will take the responsibility as a citizen of this great nation 
        to make our country a more peaceful place by doing my own part to 
        Increase the Peace.'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives urges schools across the United 
States to participate in similar ``Increase the Peace Day'' events.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```