alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**EXHIBIT 10(d)(1)**

| **Name and Principal Position**                                                                             | **2006 Base Salary**        | **2006 Merit Lump Sum Bonus** | **2006 AIP Target** | **2006 - 2008 LTIP Cycle (1)** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------------|---------------------|--------------------------------|
| **Number of Threshold Shares**                                                                              | **Number of Target Shares** | **Number of Maximum Shares**  |
| Michael H. Madison - President and Chief Executive Officer                                                  | $425,000                    | $0                            | 70%                 | 8,208                          | 27,360 | 54,720 |
| Dilek Samil - President and Chief Operating Officer (Cleco Power LLC)                                       | $300,000                    | $5,000                        | 55%                 | 3,951                          | 13,168 | 26,336 |
| Kathleen F. Nolen - Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                                       | $222,000                    | $0                            | 45%                 | 1,949                          | 6,496 | 12,992 |
| R. O'Neal Chadwick, Jr. - Senior Vice President and General Counsel                                         | $225,000                    | $4,000                        | 45%                 | 2,173                          | 7,242 | 14,484 |
| Samuel H. Charlton III - Senior Vice President and Chief Operating  Officer (Cleco Midstream Resources LLC) | $218,000                    | $9,000                        | 40%                 | 2,106                          | 7,018 | 14,036 |

(1)One half of all share amounts shown in these columns is in the form of commonstock equivalent units, which are payable in cash. The other half is in theform of restricted stock.

----
#### Innocenzo Sabatino, Respondent, *v.*The Roebling Construction Co., Appellant.

Reported below, 143 App. Div. 955.

(Submitted May 29, 1911;

decided June 6, 1911.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 10, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, his employer.

The motion was made upon the grounds that the exceptions were frivolous and the appeal taken only for purposes of delay.

*William J. Maloney*for motion.

*Satterlee, Bissell, Taylor & French*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
§ 232.711 Train air brake system tests. ( a ) Supervisors are jointly responsible with inspectors, enginemen and trainmen for condition of train air brake and air signal equipment on motive power and cars to the extent that it is possible to detect defective equipment by required air tests.
( b ) Communicating signal system on passenger equipment trains must be tested and known to be in a suitable condition for service before leaving terminal.
( c ) Each train must have the air brakes in effective operating condition, and at no time shall the number and location of operative air brakes be less than permitted by Federal requirements. When piston travel is in excess of 101 ⁄ 2 inches, the air brakes cannot be considered in effective operating condition.
( d ) Condensation must be blown from the pipe from which air is taken before connecting yard line or motive power to train.
Exhibit 32.4



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



CERTIFICATION



I, William E. Hantke, Chief Financial Officer of The Premcor Refining Group Inc. (the Company), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify as follows with respect to the
Company:



| | 1. | The annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification on this 5thday of March, 2004.



By:

/s/    William E. HantkeChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Premcor Refining Group Inc. and will be retained by The Premcor Refining Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 230.91 Chafing irons.

Chafing irons that permit proper curving shall be securely attached to the steam locomotive and tender, and shall be maintained to permit lateral and vertical movement.
§ 238.423 Fuel tanks. ( a ) *External fuel tanks.* Each type of external fuel tank must be approved by FRA's Associate Administrator for Safety upon a showing that the fuel tank provides a level of safety at least equivalent to a fuel tank that complies with the external fuel tank requirements in § 238.223(a).
( b ) *Internal fuel tanks.* Internal fuel tanks shall comply with the requirements specified in § 238.223(b).
-----Original Message----- 

From: azangril@umich.edu [mailto:azangril@umich.edu] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:24 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Mental illness is finally receiving its appropriate recognition both in 

civil society and even in the military with the acknowledgment of PTSD. 

There's no reason to treat it any differently than any other medical 

condition. 

Sincerely, 

Albert Zangrilli 

Sincerely, 

Albert Zangrilli 

380 McConnell's Trace #102 

Lexington, KY 40511
#### John McCormick, Respondent, *v.*James M. Thompson, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

Reported below, 143 App. Div. 972.

(Submitted May 15, 1911;

decided May 19, 1911.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 14, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover damages alleged to have been occasioned plaintiff by the false representations of defendant.

*567The motion was made upon the grounds that the exceptions were frivolous and the .appeal taken for purposes of delay only.

*Henry W. Williams*for motion.

*Erskine C. Rogers*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
§ 229.43 Exhaust and battery gases. ( a ) Products of combustion shall be released entirely outside the cab and other compartments. Exhaust stacks shall be of sufficient height or other means provided to prevent entry of products of combustion into the cab or other compartments under usual operating conditions.
( b ) Battery containers shall be vented and batteries kept from gassing excessively.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          26,116
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,345,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (90,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    185,115
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,685,367
<PP&E>                                       2,151,692
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,265,410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,575,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,954,967
<BONDS>                                        498,848
<COMMON>                                     3,047,804
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,926,319)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,575,300
<SALES>                                      3,217,217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,217,217
<CGS>                                        2,796,119
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,340,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               147,931
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             345,235
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,412,906)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,412,906)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,412,906)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.59)
        



</TABLE>
**Exhibit
31.2**
 
 **Certification**
 
 
 
 I, Richard H. Marsh,
certify that:
 
 1.
    I have
      reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K of FirstEnergy Corp., The
      Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and The Toledo Edison
      Company;2.
    Based on my
      knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      annual report;
 
 
 Date: May 3,
2005
 
 
 
 
 ****By:
    /s/ Richard
      H. MarshRichard H.
      MarshChief Financial
Officer
 
 
  6
§ 215.125 Defective uncoupling device. A railroad may not place or continue in service a car, if the car has an uncoupling device without sufficient vertical and lateral clearance to prevent— ( a ) Fouling on curves; or
( b ) Unintentional uncouplings.
#### § 230.42 Location of gauges.

Every boiler shall have at least one steam gauge which will correctly indicate the working pressure. The gauge shall be positioned so that it will be kept reasonably cool and can conveniently be read by the engine crew.
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*Panama Railroad Company, Respondents, v. Commissioners of Taxes, etc., Appellants.

Order affirmed, without costs.
§ 229.309 Safety-critical changes and failures. ( a ) Whenever a planned safety-critical design change is made to a product that is in use by a railroad and subject to this subpart, the railroad shall: ( 1 ) Notify FRA's Associate Administrator for Safety of the design changes made by the product supplier;
( 2 ) Ensure that the SA is updated as required;
( 3 ) Conduct all safety-critical changes in a manner that allows the change to be audited;
( 4 ) Specify all contractual arrangements with suppliers and private equipment owners for notification of any and all electronic safety-critical changes as well as safety-critical failures in the suppliers and private equipment owners' system, subsystem, or components, and the reasons for that change or failure from the suppliers or equipment owners, whether or not the railroad has experienced a failure of that safety critical system, sub-system, or component;
( 5 ) Specify the railroad's procedures for action upon receipt of notification of a safety-critical change or failure of an electronic system, sub-system, or component, and until the upgrade or revision has been installed; and
( 6 ) Identify all configuration/revision control measures designed to ensure that safety-functional requirements and safety-critical hazard mitigation processes are not compromised as a result of any such change, and that any such change can be audited.
( b ) Product suppliers and private equipment owners shall report any safety-critical changes and previously unidentified hazards to each railroad using the product or equipment.
( c ) Private equipment owners shall establish configuration/revision control measures for control of safety-critical changes and identification of previously unidentified hazards.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 5:31 PM

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyc-j4c8

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2166

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Concerned American

General Comment

Thank you for... Your concern I guess? However I believe that if I generally cannot distinguish 

good investments from bad" that is none of your business. I don't need government to tell me 

what and where to invest, or hold my investor hostage because of a choice I made. 

Maybe your agency would be better off to figure out how to make pay cuts for government 

workers at ALL levels. Then maybe I can keep some of my own income to invest, rather than 

send it all to Washington in the form of taxes to fund agencies like this in their attempt to save 

me from myself.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00001

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

File Name Description

x 05152\05152_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05152\05152_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05152\05152_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

05152\Certification Statement Plant ID 05152.pdf Plant certification statement

05152\Supplemental Documents\05152_Part-A_EPA_Questionnaire_Attachment 5-2_MAP-1_ Final 10 Sep .pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05152\Supplemental Documents\05152_Part-A_EPA_Questionnaire_Attachment 5-3_WB-1_ Final 10 Sep 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05152\05152_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

x 05152\05152_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x Draft Questions for Follow Up

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05152

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 05152\05152_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05152\05152_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05152\05152_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

05152\Certification Statement Plant ID 05152.pdf Plant certification statement

x 05152\Supplemental Documents\05152_Part-A_EPA_Questionnaire_Attachment 5-2_MAP-1_ Final 10 Sep .pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05152\Supplemental Documents\05152_Part-A_EPA_Questionnaire_Attachment 5-3_WB-1_ Final 10 Sep 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05152\05152_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05152\05152_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
iE
KREITLER

tN A ON

DOL/EBSA RIN: 1210-AB32

June 23, 2015

Jeffrey J. Turner

Chief, Division of Regulations, Office of Regulations and Interpretations
Department of Labor

Employee Benefits Security Administration.

N 5669, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., FP Building, Room N-5655,
Washington, DC 20210

Dear Mr. Turner,

I would like to oppose the proposed regulations regarding Fidiciary statandards for IRAs. There
are already multiple agencies regulating the investment industry and your proposal overlaps what
is already being done and is totally confusing. We do not need another organization
independently in this space. I urge you to drop your proposal

Sincerely, 6 LE
Robert Kreitler

oe hoet ah

265 Church Street, Suite 801 | New Haven, CT 06510 | (203) 867-4396 | FAX (203) 867-4398 | www.kreitlerfinancial.com

Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. Member FINRA/SIPC
Kreitler Financial LLC is an independent firm
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ELISEO SALDANA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3747 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed April 4, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Christopher C. Sabella, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. SILBERMAN, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, October 30, 1995 (136), Para 136.16 Budget Reconciliation, FY 1996]
[Page 1800]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.136.16  budget reconciliation, fy 1996

  Mr. KASICH, pursuant to rule XX and by direction of the Committee on 
the Budget, moved to take from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 2491) 
to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 105 of the concurrent 
resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1996; together with the 
amendment of the Senate thereto, disagree to the amendment of the Senate 
and request a conference with the Senate thereon.
  After debate,
  On motion of Mr. KASICH, the previous question was ordered on the 
motion to its adoption or rejection and under the operation thereof, 
said motion was agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the motion to disagree to the 
amendment of the Senate and request a conference with the Senate thereon 
was agreed to was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate thereof.
```
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0496.html[7/20/2015 3:51:44 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-76g1

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0496

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Gary Sturwold

General Comment

My 401K retirement fund was created and funded totally with private money. I have zero desire to get the

 Federal government in the middle of 401K planning. I am fully capable of managing my own retirement without

 any government regulations or assistance.
§ 271.205 System description. ( a ) An RRP plan shall contain a description of the characteristics of the railroad's system. At a minimum, the system description shall: ( 1 ) Support the identification of hazards by establishing a basic understanding of the scope of the railroad's system;
( 2 ) Include components briefly describing the railroad's history, operations, scope of service, maintenance, physical plant, and system requirements;
( 3 ) Identify all persons that enter into a contractual relationship with the railroad to either perform significant safety-related services on the railroad's behalf or to utilize significant safety-related services provided by the railroad for railroad operations purposes. For example, a railroad's RRP plan shall identify entities such as host railroads, contract operators, shared track/corridor operators, or other contractors utilizing or performing significant safety-related services. A railroad shall identify such persons even if the persons are not required to comply with this part (*e.g.,* a railroad shall identify a tourist railroad that operates over the railroad's track even though the tourist railroad is exempt from this part pursuant to § 271.3(b)(2)); and
( 4 ) Describe how the railroad will ensure that any persons identified pursuant to paragraph (a)(3) of this section will support and participate in the railroad's RRP. For example, the system description shall describe the extent to which such persons will, as part of the railroad's RRP, assist in identifying hazards, developing and implementing mitigation strategies, conducting internal annual assessments, or otherwise performing actions required by this part.
( b ) [Reserved]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, November 7, 1995 (141), Para 141.21 H.J. Res. 69--Unfinished Business]
[Page 1876]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.141.21  h.j. res. 69--unfinished business

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced the unfinished business to be the motion to suspend the rules 
and pass the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 69) providing for the 
reappointment of Homer Alfred Neal as a citizen regent of the Board of 
Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
  The question being put,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said joint resolution?
  The vote was taken by electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

386

affirmative

Nays

0
```