alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: danastaggs@mac.com [mailto:danastaggs@mac.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:41 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Dana Staggs 

1429 Ocean Dr 

Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
#### § 236.705 Bar, locking.

A bar in an interlocking machine to which the locking dogs are attached.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

100 

CA 13-00559 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF JOHN REILLY, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CITY OF ROME, ROME POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND 

JAMES MASUCCI, COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC SAFETY, 

RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. 

FELT EVANS, LLP, CLINTON (JAY G. WILLIAMS, III, OF COUNSEL), FOR

PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

COHEN & COHEN LLP, UTICA (RICHARD A. COHEN OF COUNSEL), FOR

RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Norman

I. Siegel, J.), entered June 13, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR

article 78. The order granted respondents’ motion to vacate a default

judgment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs. 

Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78,

petitioner appeals from an order granting respondents’ motion to

vacate a default judgment. We note at the outset that, although no

appeal as of right lies from an intermediate order in a CPLR article

78 proceeding (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]), we treat the notice of appeal

as an application for leave to appeal from the order and grant the

application (see Matter of Conde v Aiello, 204 AD2d 1029, 1029). It

is well settled that the decision whether to vacate a default judgment

is a matter within Supreme Court’s discretion (see Alliance Prop. Mgt.

& Dev. v Andrews Ave. Equities, 70 NY2d 831, 832-833). Here, given

that respondents proffered a reasonable excuse for failing to serve a

timely answer to the petition and demonstrated a meritorious defense

(see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Puchner v Nastke, 91 AD3d 1261, 1261-1262),

and considering the “strong public policy in favor of resolving cases

on the merits” (Moore v Day, 55 AD3d 803, 804; see Puchner, 91 AD3d at

1262), we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in

granting respondents’ motion (see Cavagnaro v Frontier Cent. Sch.

Dist., 17 AD3d 1099, 1099). We note that, prior to the default,

respondents engaged in settlement discussions with petitioner and

filed a motion to dismiss the petition, thus evidencing a “good faith

intent to defend” the proceeding on the merits (Coven v Trust Co. of
-2- 100 

CA 13-00559 

N.J., 225 AD2d 576, 576), and we further note that petitioner was not

prejudiced by the slight delay in answering the petition (see Accetta

v Simmons, 108 AD3d 1096, 1097). 

Entered: February 14, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### § 29.302 What is the duration of a compact?

A compact remains in effect until it is terminated by mutual written agreement, retrocession, or reassumption under this part.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending December 4, 2010

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|ARVEST BANK       | * Branch       | Arvest Bank, Fayetteville, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at 1720 South University, Little Rock, Arkansas. | Newspaper:12/08/2010Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 12/08/2010    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 30.3 Applicability. ( a ) The restrictions imposed by section 109(a) of the Continuing Resolution extend to all DOT agencies as well as all recipients of DOT funds. The restrictions apply to all projects for which funds are obligated or contracts or subcontracts are awarded during fiscal year 1988, including projects and contracts under all DOT financial assistance programs. The prohibition applies to public buildings and public works projects everywhere in the United States or any territory or possession of the United States. U.S. overseas bases, installations, and embassies are not subject to this part.
( b ) The restrictions imposed by section 115 of the Airport Safety Act extend to all projects for which funds are made available by that Act, whether or not the contracts are awarded during fiscal year 1988. The restrictions apply to all contracts entered into under grants authorized by the Airport Safety Act.
( c ) This part applies to projects covered by section 109(a) of the Continuing Resolution, section 115 of the Airport Safety Act, or both. Whether one or the other statute or both apply, the effect on the project shall be the same, subject to paragraph (e) of this section.
( d ) In addition to construction, alteration, and repair contracts, the restrictions of this part cover all architect, engineering, and other services related to the preparation and performance of construction, alteration, and repair of public projects and public works.
( e ) The restrictions of this part also apply to all products used in the construction, alteration, or repair of public projects and public works; *Provided, however,* That ( 1 ) The restrictions of this part do not apply to construction equipment or vehicles that do not become part of a delivered structure, product, or project and
( 2 ) Notwithstanding paragraph (c) of this section, the restrictions of section 109(a) of the Continuing Resolution do not apply to vehicles to be used by the project, including, but not limited to, buses, trucks, automobiles, rail rolling stock, and aircraft.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Century
Properties Fund XIX 1997 first quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000705752
<NAME> CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,805
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                          95,201
<DEPRECIATION>                                (37,852)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F2>
<BONDS>                                         61,482
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (175)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,137
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,984
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       124
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.23<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F2>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F1>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: DevinPosey@aol.com [mailto:DevinPosey@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 10:52 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 02, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Devin Posey 

4280 Adeline St 

Emeryville, CA 94608
§ 368.6 FMCSA action on the application. ( a ) The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration will review the application for correctness, completeness, and adequacy of information. Non-material errors will be corrected without notice to the applicant. Incomplete applications may be rejected.
( b ) If the applicant does not require or is not eligible for a Certificate of Registration, the FMCSA will deny the application and notify the applicant.
( c ) The FMCSA will validate the accuracy of information and certifications provided in the application against data maintained in databases of the governments of Mexico and the United States.
( d ) If the FMCSA determines that the application and certifications demonstrate that the application is consistent with the FMCSA's safety fitness policy, it will issue a provisional Certificate of Registration, including a distinctive USDOT Number that identifies the motor carrier as permitted to provide interstate transportation of property solely in municipalities in the United States on the U.S.-Mexico international border or within the commercial zones of such municipalities.
( e ) The FMCSA may issue a permanent Certificate of Registration to the holder of a provisional Certificate of Registration no earlier than 18 months after the date of issuance of the Certificate and only after completion to the satisfaction of the FMCSA of the safety monitoring system for Mexico-domiciled carriers set out in subpart B of part 385 of this subchapter.
( f ) Notice of the authority sought will not be published in either the Federal Register or the FMCSA Register. Protests or comments will not be allowed. There will be no oral hearings.
#### In the Matter of the Writ of Certiorari of JOHN J. LEARY, late Private Thirteenth Regiment to MAJOR W. H. H. TYSON, President of a Court-Martial.

*•Certiorari*— liability *of the unsuccessful party for costs*— the *president of a court-martial is personally liable*therefor— *Code of Owil Procedure,*secs. 2007, 2129, 3258.

Where a judgment of a court-martial is brought into the Supreme Court hy a writ of *certiorarri*and there reversed, the respondent is personally liable for the costs awarded hy the final order, and may be adjudged guilty of a contempt if he fail to pay them after a demand therefor has been duly made.

Appeal from an order made at a Special Term requiring Major W. H. H. Tyson to pay certain costs or to be committed as for a contempt of court.

The costs were imposed by an order reversing a judgment of a court-martial upon the return to a writ of *cerbiorari.*

The opinion of the court upon the hearing of the matter brought before it by the *certiorari*is reported in 27 Hun, 564.

*Horatio C. King,*judge advocate general, counsel for appellant on behalf of the State.

*John J. Leary,*relator in person.

Barnard, P. J.:

Major W. H. IT. Tyson, according to the provisions of the Military Code held a court-martial and imposed a judgment against John J. Leaiy. This judgment was brought up to the Supreme Court for review by the defendant Leáry, and the same was reversed with certain costs. The court-martial never obtained any jurisdiction of the. person of the defendant Leary. The record of the court-martial was made up by Major Tyson, and was brought into the Supreme Court by a writ of *certiorari*duly allowed. By section 1991 of the Code of Civil Procedure a writ of *certiorari*is one of three writs denominated State writs. By section 2007, it is provided that in special proceedings instituted by State writ, the person required to pay the costs awarded by a final order may be punished for a contempt for non-payment of costs after demand *395therefor. The writ was properly directed to Major Tyson. (Code, §.2129.) By section 3258 he would have been entitled to increased costs in case he had succeeded upon the final order “ in a special proceeding- instituted by State writ.”

The order should therefore be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Pratt and Dtkman, JJ., concurred.

Order affirmed, with costs and'disbursements.'
exv10w9w5



 








Exhibit 10.9.5




Description of the Reinsurance Agreement for 2006 between ACIC and General

Reinsurance Corporation effective January 1, 2006




The Company, on behalf of its subsidiaries American Compensation Insurance Company (ACIC) and
Bloomington Compensation Insurance Company (BCIC), entered into a reinsurance contract for the
fiscal year beginning January 1, 2006. The following summarizes the significant terms of this
reinsurance contract.



LIABILITY OF THE REINSURER



The Reinsurer shall pay to ACIC and BCIC, with respect to Workers’ Compensation and Employers’
Liability Business, the amount of Net Loss for each Occurrence, as defined in the contract, in
excess of ACIC’s and BCIC’s retention, but not exceeding the Limits of Liability of the Reinsurer
as follows:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Loss Layer	 	Reinsurer	 	Comment
	$5,000,000 excess $5,000,000

	 	General Reinsurance Corporation
	 	Non Minnesota losses
 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	$10,000,000 excess

$10,000,000

	 	General Reinsurance Corporation
	 	Non Minnesota losses.
Net loss for any one employee shall not
exceed $10,000,000
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Excess of $20,000,000

	 	 	 	Non Minnesota losses

100% retained by

ACIC






COMMENCEMENT AND TERMINATION



The contract shall apply to new and renewal policies of ACIC and BCIC becoming effective at and
after 12:01 A.M., January 1, 2006, and to policies in force at 12:01 A.M., January 1, 2006, with
respect to losses resulting from Occurrences taking place at or after the aforesaid time and date.



The contract is for one year and automatically expires at 12:01 A.M. on January 1, 2007. The
Reinsurer may also terminate the contract in the event of significant adverse events at ACIC or
BCIC or in the event of a change in control of ACIC, BCIC or RTW, Inc.



REINSURANCE PREMIUM



ACIC and BCIC agreed to pay the Reinsurer based on subject premiums earned for each Loss Layer as
shown above. These rates are similar to the rates that we paid in 2005.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of PHI GROUP, INC. on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Henry Fahman, President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Henry FahmanHenry FahmanPresident/DirectorMay 23, 2011
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 10, 2015

No. 04-15-00342-CV

VILLA DIJON CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Appellant

v.

Mary WINTERS,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-03926

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In cause number 2015CI00148, the trial court signed a default judgment against 

Appellants on March 9, 2015. In the same document, the trial court severed the claims against 

Appellants and assigned them to cause number 2015CI03926. 

Absent a timely filed motion that would extend the deadline to file a notice of appeal, see, 

e.g., TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a), Appellants’ notice of appeal in cause number 2015CI03926 was due 

on April 8, 2015, see id. R. 26.1. A motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was 

due not later than April 23, 2015. See id. R. 26.3. Appellants’ notice of appeal was filed on June 

3, 2015. See generally Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (“[A] motion for 

extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant acting in good faith files a [notice of 

appeal] beyond the time allowed by Rule [26.1], but within the fifteen-day period in which the 

appellant would be entitled to move to extend the filing deadline under Rule [26.3].” (emphasis 

added)). 

We ORDER Appellants to SHOW CAUSE in writing within FIFTEEN DAYS of the 

date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(a); Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617 (“[O]nce the period for granting a motion for 

extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate 

court’s jurisdiction.”). If Appellants fail to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be 

dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of September, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
§ 174.300 Special handling requirements. ( a ) Class 3 (flammable liquid) materials may not be loaded, transported, or stored in a rail car equipped with any type of lighted heater or open-flame device, or in a rail car equipped with any apparatus or mechanism utilizing an internal combustion engine in its operation.
( b ) A truck body or trailer which is loaded with a Class 3 (flammable liquid) materials and equipped with a lighted heater or any automatic heating or refrigerating apparatus may not be loaded on a flatcar except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) Heating or refrigeration apparatus on a motor vehicle loaded with Class 3 (flammable liquid) materials may be operated while the motor vehicle is loaded on a flatcar only if: ( 1 ) The lading space is not equipped with any electrical apparatus that is not non-sparking or explosion-proof;
( 2 ) There is no combustion apparatus in the lading space;
( 3 ) There is no connection for the return of air from the lading space to any combustion apparatus; and
( 4 ) The heating system conforms to § 393.77 of this title and does not heat any part of the lading over 54 °C (129 °F).
( d ) Metal barrels or drums containing Class 3 (flammable liquid) materials may be transported in a steel gondola or flatcar or in a stock car. However, they may not be transported in a hopper bottom car.
[Amdt. 174-26, 41 FR 16092, Apr. 15, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 174-31, 43 FR 31143, July 20, 1978; Amdt. 174-68, 55 FR 52683, Dec. 21, 1990]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0817.html[7/21/2015 2:55:07 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-w32f

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0817

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Theodore Colunga

General Comment

Federal government is over regulating peoples lives as it is! Please leave retirement alone. If it is to generate

 funds for the US coffers, prove that you can handle what you already regulate. So far, no good! Not even close.
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




Fiscal Year 2007 Annual Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers

Effective April 23, 2006




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Fiscal 2007
	Name	 	Title	 	Base Salary
	Marvin J. Girouard
	 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	 	$	1,000,000	 
	Charles H. Turner
	 	Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
	 	$	380,000	 
	Jay
R. Jacobs
	 	Executive Vice President, Merchandising
	 	$	380,000	 
	E. Mitchell Weatherly
	 	Executive Vice President, Stores
	 	$	340,000	 
	Phil
E. Schneider
	 	Executive Vice President, Marketing
	 	$	285,000	 
	David
A. Walker
	 	Executive Vice President, Logistics and Allocations
	 	$	285,000