alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350)



The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the foregoing
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Southern BancShares (N.C.), Inc. (the issuer) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                     |  |                                                 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 3, 2004 |  | /s/ John C. Pegram, Jr.                         
|                     |  | John C. Pegram, Jr.,                            
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer           
|                     | 
|Date: August 3, 2004 |  | /s/ David A. Bean                               
|                     |  | David A. Bean,                                  
|                     |  | Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Docket: IRS-2009-0008 

Request for Information for Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 

2008 

Comment On: IRS-2009-0008-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: IRS-2009-0008-0102 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Carol Jeanette Counts 

Address: 

Mokena, IL, 

Organization: Neurotheray Plus 

General Comment 

Neurotherapy (a form of biofeedback) has been available since the early 1970's. 

While neurotherapy is not a " miracle worker" it has been shown to greatly 

improve a number of conditions with a neurological base. Please read the 

attached paper and consider including neurotherapy as a valuable and needed 

addition to our treatment protocol. 

Thank you, 

Carol Counts RN 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 29, 2009 

Tracking No. 809bc600 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 838 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 838

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow individuals who are 
   exempt from the self-employment tax by reason of their religious 
                 beliefs to establish Keogh plans, etc.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2001

   Mr. Pitts (for himself, Mr. Portman, Mr. English, Mr. Regula, Mr. 
  Peterson of Pennsylvania, and Mr. Souder) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow individuals who are 
   exempt from the self-employment tax by reason of their religious 
                 beliefs to establish Keogh plans, etc.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF PENSION PLANS TO SELF-EMPLOYED INDIVIDUALS 
              WHO ARE EXEMPT FROM THE SELF-EMPLOYMENT TAX BY REASON OF 
              THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 401(c)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining earned income) is amended by 
adding at the end thereof the following new sentence: ``This 
subparagraph shall be applied as if the term `trade or business' for 
purposes of section 1402 included service described in section 
1402(c)(6).''.
    (b) Simple Retirement Accounts.--Clause (ii) of section 
408(p)(6)(A) of such Code (defining self-employed) is amended by adding 
at the end the following new sentence: ``The preceding sentence shall 
be applied as if the term `trade or business' for purposes of section 
1402 included service described in section 1402(c)(6).''.
    (c) Technical Amendment.--Paragraph (1) of section 219(f) of such 
Code is amended by striking the last sentence.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/15/15 9:40 PM

Received: July 15, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jzu-sntn

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2318

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

The SEC, FINRA and the states all have rules and regulations to protect clients. Adding another 

layer of regulations on top of the existing regime will only create a more fractured and confusing 

environment for both advisors and clients which will not enhance client protection that the 

additional regulation intends.

As drafted, the rule prohibits variable compensation paid in retirement accounts, including IRAs. 

However, certain transactions allow for variable compensation, including commissions and 12b1s under certain conditions. First, the client must agree to the terms outlined in the Best Interest 

Contract Exemption (BICE) contract. The contract must be executed before an advisor can offer 

any retirement advice. In other words, the client will need to sign an agreement before the client 

and advisor even decide to proceed on an engagement. It is the cart before the horse. 

Second, the proposed BICE requires the advisor and the firm to adhere to numerous detailed, 

costly and impractical requirements while producing an unprecedented amount of very specific 

data on a point of sale and annual basis. Consequently, advisors will need to decide at what 

minimum investment level can they cost effectively deliver financial advice.

As a result, advisors and the firm may no longer be able to cost-effectively deliver financial 

advice to small and mid-size clients who need the most retirement help.
§ 26.35 What role do business development and mentor-protégé programs have in the DBE program? ( a ) You may or, if an operating administration directs you to, you must establish a DBE business development program (BDP) to assist firms in gaining the ability to compete successfully in the marketplace outside the DBE program. You may require a DBE firm, as a condition of receiving assistance through the BDP, to agree to terminate its participation in the DBE program after a certain time has passed or certain objectives have been reached. See Appendix C of this part for guidance on administering BDP programs.
( b ) As part of a BDP or separately, you may establish a “mentor-protégé” program, in which another DBE or non-DBE firm is the principal source of business development assistance to a DBE firm. ( 1 ) Only firms you have certified as DBEs before they are proposed for participation in a mentor-protégé program are eligible to participate in the mentor-protégé program.
( 2 ) In the mentor-protégé relationship, you must: ( i ) Not award DBE credit to a non-DBE mentor firm for using its own protégé firm for more than one half of its goal on any contract let by the recipient; and
( ii ) Not award DBE credit to a non-DBE mentor firm for using its own protégé firm for more than every other contract performed by the protégé firm.
( 3 ) For purposes of making determinations of business size under this part, you must not treat protégé firms as affiliates of mentor firms, when both firms are participating under an approved mentor-protégé program. See Appendix D of this part for guidance concerning the operation of mentor-protégé programs.
( c ) Your BDPs and mentor-protégé programs must be approved by the concerned operating administration before you implement them. Once approved, they become part of your DBE program.
[64 FR 5126, Feb. 2, 1999, as amended at 89 FR 24966, Apr. 9, 2024]
II

Calendar No. 287

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 861

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 15, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

DECEMBER 13, 2001

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment

AN ACT

To make technical amendments to section 10 of title 9,

United States Code.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. VACATION OF AWARDS.

4 Section 10 of title 9, United States Code, is

5 amended—

6 (1) by indenting the margin of paragraphs (1)

7 through (4) of subsection (a) 2 ems;

8 (2) by striking ‘‘Where’’ in such paragraphs

9 and inserting ‘‘where’’;
2

HR 861 RS

1 (3) by striking the period at the end of para2 graphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (a) and insert3 ing a semicolon and by adding ‘‘or’’ at the end of

4 paragraph (3);

5 (4) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub6 section (c); and

7 (5) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘Where an

8 award’’ and inserting ‘‘If an award’’, by inserting a

9 comma after ‘‘expired’’, and by redesignating the

10 paragraph as subsection (b).

Passed the House of Representatives March 14,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 287

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 861

AN ACT

To make technical amendments to section 10 of

title 9, United States Code.

DECEMBER 13, 2001

Reported without amendment
-----Original Message----- 

From: pagestalt@comcast.net [mailto:pagestalt@comcast.net] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 2:40 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ron Gladis 

1434 Treeline Drive 

Malvern, PA 19355
**Exhibit No. 21.1**

 

 **SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**

**As of  September 30, 2010**
      - PHI Capital Holdings, Inc. 

Percentage of ownership: 100%

Business activity:  Consulting and M&A advisory services

 
      - Providential Vietnam, Ltd.

Percentage of ownership: 100%

Business activity: Consulting

 
      - Philand Ranch Limited –  UK

Percentage of ownership: 75.50%

Business activity: real estate development

 
      - PHI Mining Group, Inc., formerly DDC Industries, Inc.

Percentage of ownership: 82.71%

Business activity: Mining

 
      - Providential Energy Corporation

Percentage of ownership: 100%

Business activity: Independent Oil & Gas, Alternative Energy

 
      - Provimex, Inc

Percentage of ownership: 85%

Business activity: Trading and Imports/Exports

 
      -  Vietnam Media Group, Inc., formerly Touchlink Communications, Inc.

Percentage of ownership: 85%

Business activity: Multi-media

 

 

----
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0611.html[7/21/2015 7:04:58 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-z5i6

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0611

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: raymond martucci

Address:

142 storm dr

holtsville, 11742

Email: eaglesareforlife@yahoo.com

Phone: 6317863445

General Comment

Obama needs to,mind his business, and stop trying to control people. I am smart on what I do with my money
Michael Brackett, Plaintiff,
v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Civil ActionNo. Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney General, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED APR 3 0

## 2012 Clerk, U.S. District &Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia 

# 12 0683

This matter is before the Court on review ofplaintiffs

### pro se complaint and application to proceed 

### informapauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

### § 1915A (requiring dismissal ofa prisoner's complaintupon a determination that the complaint fails to state a claimupon which reliefmay be granted). Plaintiffis an inmate at the United States Penitentiary Hazelton in Bruceton Mills, West Virginia, suing under 

### Bivens v. Six Unknown NamedAgents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), to challenge the constitutionality ofthe statutes under which he was convicted. The gravamen ofthe complaint is that the sentencing court, the United States District Court for the Northern District ofWest Virginia, lackedjurisdiction over plaintiffs criminal prosecution. Because the success ofplaintiffs claim would necessarily void his conviction, plaintiff cannot recover monetary damages, which is the only available remedy under 

### Bivens, without first showing that he has invalidated the conviction by "revers[al] on direct appeal, expunge[ment] by executive order, declar[ation ofinvalidity] by a state tribunal authorized to make such determination, or ... a federal court's issuance ofa writ ofhabeas corpus." 

### Heck v. Humphrey,512 U.S. 477,486-87 (1994); see, e.g., Taylor v. 

### US Bd. of Parole, 194 F.2d 882,883 (D.C. Cir. 1952) (stating that a motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is the proper vehicle for challenging the constitutionality ofa statute under which a defendant is convicted); Ojo v. 

### I.N.S., I06 F.3d 680, 683 (5 1 h Cir. 1997) (explaining that the sentencing court is the only court with jurisdictionto hear a defendant's complaintregarding errors that occurred before or during sentencing). Plaintiffhas not shown the invalidation ofhis conviction and, thus, has failed to state a claim upon which reliefcan be granted under Bivens. A separate Order ofdismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion
.

..t;t.., Date:**April~'** 2012

2
#### §§ 28.132-28.139 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 172 (Thursday, September 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51212-51213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4344]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Proposed New Fee Site; Federal Lands Recreation 
Enhancement Act, (Title VIII, Pub. L. 108-447)

AGENCY: Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest, USDA Forest Service.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed New Fee Site.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Wild Rivers Ranger District of the Rogue River-Siskiyou 
National Forest is proposing to charge a $4/day use fee per vehicle at 
the Illinois River Scenic Recreation area. A seasonal pass of $25 per 
vehicle and a charge of $10 fee for the overnight use of Store Gulch 
Campground are also proposed. These fees are proposed to begin in 
fiscal year 2008. Use of the developed recreation facilities on the 
Illinois River of the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest has shown 
that the public appreciates and enjoys the availability of the 
recreation experience. Funds from the fee charges would be used for the 
continued operation and maintenance of the Illinois River Scenic 
Recreation area and improvements including law enforcement and 
sanitation.

[[Page 51213]]


DATES: The fees would be charged from May 1 to September 30.

ADDRESSES: Forest Supervisor, Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest, 333 
W. 8th Street/P.O. Box 520, Medford, Oregon 97501-0209.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry Sirski, Recreation Specialist, 
541-899-3815.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act 
(Title VII, Pub. L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to 
publish a six month advance notice in the Federal Register whenever new 
recreation fee areas are proposed.
    These facilities are in close proximity to the Wild, Scenic, and 
Recreational segments of the Illinois River. This area offers 
significant recreational viewing opportunities, fishing experiences, 
and is rich in historical and cultural importance. A market analysis 
indicates that the $4/per day single vehicle fee is both reasonable and 
acceptable for this sort of unique recreation experience.

    Dated: August 29, 2007.
Scott D. Conroy,
Forest Supervisor, Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest.
[FR Doc. 07-4344 Filed 9-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Exhibit 10.2 - Dotter Claim.



Exhibit 10.2


 

	
[BC Government

Seal]
	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	
Mineral Titles Online Viewer

	
 

	 	 	
Public Access 


	
 

	 	 	
Tenure Detail 

	 
	
 

	 	 	
Tenure Number ID 
	
407369   View Tenure 

	 	 	
Tenure Type 
	
Mineral (M) 

	 	 	
Tenure Sub Type 
	
Claim (C) 

	 	 	
Title Type 
	
Four Post Claim (MC4) 

	 	 	
Mining Division 
	
GREENWOOD 

	 	 	
Good To Date 
	
2006/DEC/03 

	 	 	
Issue Date 
	
2003/DEC/05

	 	 	
Termination Type 
	 
	 	 	
Termination Comments 
	 
	 	 	
Termination Date 
	 
	 	 	
Tag Number
	
237050

	 	 	
Claim Name 
	
DOTTER

	 	 	
Old Tenure Code 
	
407369

	 	 	
Area In Hectares 
	
225.0

	 
	 	 	
Map Numbers: 

	 	 	 	
 082E035 

	 	 	 	
 082E045 

	 
	 	 	
Owners: 

	 	 	 	
 146264 ANDREI STYTSENKO 100.0% 

	 
	 	 	
Agents: 

	 	 	 	
 109141 GERARD GALLISSANT L_CAPP (3203958) 

	 	 	 	
 103216 LLOYD CHRISTOPHER BREWER L_CAD (3221479) 

	 	 	 	
 109141 GERARD GALLISSANT CIL (4057104) 

	 	 	 	
 109141 GERARD GALLISSANT BSLI (4057147) 

	 	 	 	
 103216 LLOYD CHRISTOPHER BREWER BSLC (4057150)
#### § 178.1030 Purpose and scope.

This subpart prescribes certain testing requirements for Flexible Bulk Containers identified in subpart R of this part.
-----Original Message----- 

From: ojdart@fastmail.fm [mailto:ojdart@fastmail.fm] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:11 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

The stigma of mental health issues is exacerbated by a different 

coverage, as though a mental ailment is a personal failing. This keeps 

many who need the help from seeking it, which is worsened when they 

take out their illness on others in abuse and violence, which then 

expands the problem. 

That may increase the coffers of insurers for these added problems, but 

only makes the health of the nation worse. 

Sincerely, 

Joan Lobell 

5107 Whiteford Ave 

Baltimore, MD 21212
#### The People of the State of New York *v.*The People’s Savings Bank of the City of New York. The Same *v.*The Central Park Savings Bank of the City of New York.—

Order granted.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Biomedical Library and Informatics Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         March 8-9, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         March 8, 2007, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Library of Medicine, Building 38, Board Room 2nd Floor, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894.                    

*Time:*                         March 9, 2007, 8 a.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Library of Medicine, Building 38, Board Room 2nd Floor, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Arthur A. Petrosian, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968, 301-496-4253,                         *petrosia@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 25, 2007.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-446 Filed 1-31-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M