alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000

<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>           DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                5,548
<SECURITIES>                         44,410
<RECEIVABLES>                        12,736
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       64,270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     0
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                447
<OTHER-SE>                          (25,628)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         64,270
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      3,995
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (1,275)
<INCOME-TAX>                           (191)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (1,084)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         (1,084)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.02)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.2


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-22819 and 333-58318) pertaining to the Biopool  International,  Inc.
1993  Stock  Incentive  Plan and the  Biopool  International,  Inc.  2000  Stock
Incentive  Plan  of our  report  dated  March  13,  2002,  with  respect  to the
consolidated  financial statements of Xtrana, Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form  10-KSB)  for the year  ended  December  31,  2002,  with  respect  to the
consolidated  balance  sheet of  Xtrana,  Inc.  as of  December  31,  2001  (not
presented  separately  therein),  and  the  related  consolidated  statement  of
operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended.



                              /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                              ---------------------
                                Ernst & Young LLP




Denver, Colorado
March 28, 2003
Summary of Changes to Annual Compensation of Certain Executive Executives



 EXHIBIT 10.33 
  
 Summary of Changes to Annual Compensation of Certain Executive Officers 
  
 On February 15, 2006, pursuant to an annual salary review performed in
accordance with the current employment agreements of co-Chief Executive Officers Richard L. Rosenfield and Larry S. Flax, and Chief Financial Officer Susan M. Collyns (collectively, the “executive officers”), the Compensation Committee of
the Company’s Board of Directors approved an increase to each of the executive officers’ annual base compensation. Effective January 2, 2006, the annual base compensation will increase from $500,000 to $540,000 for each of the
co-Chief Executive Officers and increase from $300,000 to $325,000 for the Chief Financial Officer.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A2 11 2 . BETHEA CRABTREE v . CRANFORD HOMES, I NC.

In t h i s ci v i l act i on , d efen d an t Bet h ea Crab t ree fi l ed t h i s d i r e c t ap p eal fro m a

t ri al co u rt o rd er g ran t i ng p l ai n t i ff Cra n fo rd Ho m es , In c.’ s m o t i o n t o co n fi rm an

arb i t rat i on award . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

“ [T] h i s Co u rt h as n o j u ri s d i ct i o n t o co n si d er an ap p eal t ak en fro m a rev i ewi n g

co u rt ’ s o rd er co n fi rm i n g an arb i t rat i o n award ; rat h er, u p o n en t ry o f t h e co u rt ’ s o rd er

c o n f i rm i ng t h e award

, a s ep arat e ju d g m en t m u s t al s o b e en t ered b y t h e rev i ewi n g

co u rt

, an d t h i s Co u rt has ju ri s d i ct i o n t o co n s i d er an ap p eal tak en fro m t h e ju d g m en t

. OCGA § § 5 -6 -3 4 (a); 9 -9 -1 5 ; 9 -9 -1 6 .” Gr een Tr ee S er vi ci ng

, LLC v. Jo n es , 3 3 3 Ga.

Ap p

. 1 84

, 1 8 4 (1 ) (7 75 SE2 d 7 1 4 ) (2 0 1 5); s ee al so McFa r l a n d v

. Ro b er t s , 3 3 5 Ga.

A p p

. 4 0

, 4 7 (1 ), n

. 4 (7 7 8 SE2 d 3 4 9 ) (2 0 15 ) (“ An o rd er si m p l y co n fi rm i n g a n

arb i t rat i on award is n o t a fi n al

, ap peal ab l e ju d g m en t

. . . . ” )

. Al t h o u g h t h e

co n fi rm at i o n o rd er an d ju d g m en t m ay b e en t ered o n t h e s am e d o cu m en t , s ee Gr een

Tr ee S er vi ci ng

, LLC

, 3 3 3 Ga. Ap p

. at 1 8 5 (1 ), t he t ri al co u rt h ere d i d n o t en t er a fi n al

ju d g m en t i n t he o rd er co n fi rm i n g t h e a r bitrat io n award

, an d n o fi n al ju d g m en t ap p ears

i n t he reco rd

. W h ere n o fi n al ju dg m e n t h a s b een en tered

, p art i es are req u i red t o fo l l o w t h e

i n t erl o cu t o ry ap p eal p ro ced u res

– i n cl u di n g o b t ai n i n g a cert i fi cat e o f i m m ed i at e

rev i ew fro m t h e t ri al co u rt

– t o ap p eal t h e o rd er co n fi rm i n g t h e arb i t rat i o n award

. See

OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (b ); B o

y d v. S t a t e , 1 9 1 Ga. Ap p

. 4 3 5

, 4 3 5 (3 83 SE2 d 9 0 6 ) (1 9 8 9 ). November 03, 2020Crab t ree’ s fai l ure t o d o so h ere d ep ri v es u s of ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t h i s ap p eal

, wh i ch i s

h ereb y DISM ISSED. See Ba il ey v. Ba i l ey , 2 6 6 Ga. 8 3 2, 8 3 3 (4 7 1 SE2 d 2 13 ) (1 9 9 6 ).

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 11/03/2020
§ 29.927 What notice and service must the Department and the Tribe provide? ( a ) The Department and the Tribe must file each document with U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
( b ) The Department and the Tribe must serve copies of each document with: ( 1 ) The Self-Governance Official; and
( 2 ) The authorized Tribal representative.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 926

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that employees

of a political subdivision of a State shall not lose their exemption from

the hospital insurance tax by reason of the consolidation of the subdivision with the State.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 7, 2001

Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr. FRANK, Mr.

MCGOVERN, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. OLVER, and Mr. MARKEY) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and

Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify

that employees of a political subdivision of a State shall

not lose their exemption from the hospital insurance

tax by reason of the consolidation of the subdivision

with the State.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 926 IH

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT RELATION2 SHIP WHERE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF

3 STATE IS CONSOLIDATED WITH STATE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (D) of section

5 3121(u)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

6 to application of hospital insurance tax to Federal, State,

7 and local employment) is amended by adding at the end

8 the following new clause:

9 ‘‘(iii) An employee of a political sub10 division of a State shall not be treated as

11 having terminated such employee’s employ12 ment relationship with such subdivision by

13 reason of the abolition of such subdivision

14 (or other consolidation of any agency or in15 strumentality of such subdivision with the

16 State) if, as a result of such abolition (or

17 other consolidation), such employee be18 comes an employee of the State and con19 tinues to hold the same or substantially the

20 same position with the State.’’

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

22 subsection (a) shall apply to all abolitions and other con23 solidations, whether occurring before, on, or after the date

24 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 955

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for a National Living

Organ Donor Registry.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 8, 2001

Mr. INSLEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for

a National Living Organ Donor Registry.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Organ Donor Enhance5 ment Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAM FOR LIVING ORGAN

7 DONOR REGISTRY.

8 Part H of title III of the Public Health Service Act

9 (42 U.S.C. 273 et seq.) is amended by inserting after sec10 tion 372 the following section:
2

•HR 955 IH

1 ‘‘LIVING ORGAN DONOR REGISTRY

2 ‘‘SEC. 372A. (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall

3 by contract establish and maintain a National Living

4 Organ Donor Registry (referred to in this section as the

5 ‘Donor Registry’) for the purpose of increasing the num6 ber of transplants for recipients suitably matched to bio7 logically unrelated individuals who are willing to be living

8 donors of organs.

9 ‘‘(b) ADMINISTRATION OF REGISTRY.—The Donor

10 Registry shall be under the general supervision of the Sec11 retary, and under the direction of a board of directors that

12 includes representatives of patients, living organ donors,

13 recipients of living organ donations, transplant centers,

14 and such other individuals as the Secretary determines to

15 be appropriate.

16 ‘‘(c) FUNCTIONS.—The Registry shall—

17 ‘‘(1) establish a system for finding living organ

18 donors suitably matched to unrelated recipients for

19 organ transplantation;

20 ‘‘(2) carry out a program for the recruitment of

21 living organ donors;

22 ‘‘(3) carry out informational and educational

23 activities;
3

•HR 955 IH

1 ‘‘(4) annually update information to account for

2 changes in the status of individuals as potential liv3 ing organ donors;

4 ‘‘(5) provide for a system of patient advocacy,

5 and provide case management services for patients;

6 and

7 ‘‘(6) provide for a system of donor advocacy

8 (separate from the system for patient advocacy), and

9 provide case management services for living organ

10 donors and for potential such donors to whom the

11 Donor Registry has provided a notice that the poten12 tial donor may be suitably matched to a particular

13 patient.

14 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—For the

15 purpose of carrying out this section, there are authorized

16 to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for

17 each of the fiscal years 2002 through 2006.’’.

Æ
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132691(33) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, CITY OF DETROIT, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 132691 

 COA: 270520 

Wayne CC: 06-605831-AV

36th District Court: 04-328091 

BEVERLY A. MOORE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 26, 

2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

d0521 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2007 

 Clerk
-----Original Message----- 

From: marihowe@comcast.net [mailto:marihowe@comcast.net] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 12:39 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Marilyn Howe 

10505 Redbud NW 

Albuquerque, NM 87114
EXHIBIT 21





                             FIRSTENERGY CORP.

                  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                           AT DECEMBER 31, 2001


Ohio Edison Company - Incorporated in Ohio

The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company - Incorporated in Ohio

The Toledo Edison Company - Incorporated in Ohio

Centerior Service Company - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Properties Company - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Ventures Corporation - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Facilities Services Group, LLC - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Securities Transfer Company - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Service Company - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Solutions Corp. - Incorporated in Ohio

MARBEL Energy Corporation - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Holdings, LLC - Incorporated in Ohio

FE Acquisition Corp. - Incorporated in Ohio

American Transmission Systems, Inc. - Incorporated in Ohio

FELHC, Inc. - Incorporated in Ohio

Jersey Central Power & Light Company - Incorporated in New Jersey

Metropolitan Edison Company - Incorporated in Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Electric Company - Incorporated in Pennsylvania

GPU Advanced Resources, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware

GPU Capital, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware

GPU Diversified Holdings, LLC - Incorporated in Delaware

GPU Nuclear, Inc. - Incorporated in New Jersey

GPU Power, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware

GPU Service, Inc. - Incorporated in Pennsylvania

GPU Telecom Services, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware

MYR Group, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware



                        Statement of Differences
                        ------------------------

Exhibit Number 21, List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant at December 31, 2001,
is not included in the printed document.
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.15(d)

                       [DELTA AIR LINES, INC. LETTERHEAD]

I hereby acknowledge that I am not a participant in any Delta Air Lines, Inc.
severance plan or program, and that I am not currently eligible for any
severance benefit under any plan or program at Delta, including any benefits
under any Executive Retention Protection Agreement.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT, RELINQUISHMENT
AND RELEASE:

----------------------------
Signature

----------------------------
Name (Please print)

----------------------------
Date
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2469 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2469

 To amend title II of the Social Security Act to permit an individual 
   entitled to both old-age or disability insurance benefits and to 
    widow's or widower's insurance benefits to receive both without 
 reduction in the amount of the widow's or widower's insurance benefit 
     by the amount of the old-age or disability insurance benefit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 1995

 Mr. Stockman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title II of the Social Security Act to permit an individual 
   entitled to both old-age or disability insurance benefits and to 
    widow's or widower's insurance benefits to receive both without 
 reduction in the amount of the widow's or widower's insurance benefit 
     by the amount of the old-age or disability insurance benefit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wanda Boughton Social Security 
Original Intent Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. RECEIPT OF BOTH OLD-AGE OR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS AND 
              WIDOW'S OR WIDOWER'S INSURANCE BENEFITS WITHOUT REDUCTION 
              IN THE WIDOW'S OR WIDOWER'S INSURANCE BENEFIT.

    Section 202(k)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
402(k)(3)(A)) is amended by inserting ``(other than a widow's or 
widower's insurance benefit)'' after ``any other monthly insurance 
benefit for such month''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 2 of this Act shall apply with 
respect to benefits for months after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Civ. No. 2817.

Fourth Dist.

Aug. 14, 1941.]

#### RALPH E. PETTIFORD, Appellant, v. ESTELLE B. NELSON, Respondent.

No appearance for Appellant.

Nottbusch & Nottbusch and Betts & Garrison for Respondent.

BARNARD, P. J.

The respondent has moved to dismiss this appeal under the provisions of rule Y, section 1 of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.

It appears from the certificate of the clerk of the trial court that the judgment appealed from was entered on October 22, 1940, and that a notice of appeal and request for transcript were served and filed on January 6, 1941, but neither a clerk’s transcript nor a reporter’s transcript has been filed in this court. It further appears from the clerk’s certificate that proceedings for the preparation of a record were terminated in the trial court by an order entered on June 17,

1941. No briefs have been filed and no appearance has been made on behalf of the appellant in response to the notice of motion to dismiss the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

Griffin, J., and Mundo, J., *pro tem.,*concurred.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0588.html[7/20/2015 9:36:27 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-mrav

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0588

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

American citizens are more than capable to plan their own retirement. Government has no right to dictate how

 one should spend his or her own retirement funds. Government already controls the poor citizens their whole

 lives, isn't that enough?
#### § 236.10 Electric locks, force drop type; where required.

Electric locks on new installations and new electric locks applied to existing installations shall be of the forced drop type.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 891

To prohibit the possession of a firearm by an individual who has committed

an act of juvenile delinquency that would be a violent felony if committed

by an adult.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 2001

Mr. MOORE (for himself, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mrs. MORELLA, Mrs.

MCCARTHY of New York, Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Ms. MCCARTHY

of Missouri, Mr. HOLT, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr.

GONZALEZ, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. FRANK, and Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To prohibit the possession of a firearm by an individual

who has committed an act of juvenile delinquency that

would be a violent felony if committed by an adult.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Guns For Violent

5 Perpetrators Act’’.
2

•HR 891 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON POSSESSION OF A FIREARM BY AN

2 INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS COMMITTED AN ACT

3 OF JUVENILE DELINQUENCY THAT WOULD

4 BE A VIOLENT FELONY IF COMMITTED BY AN

5 ADULT.

6 Section 922(g)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is

7 amended—

8 (1) by striking the comma; and

9 (2) by inserting ‘‘, or adjudicated as having

10 committed an act of juvenile delinquency that would

11 be a crime of violence (as defined in section

12 924(c)(3)) and punishable by imprisonment for such

13 term if committed by an adult’’ before the semi14 colon.

Æ
TRINAD CAPITAL MASTER FUND LTD
                      2121 AVENUE OF THE STARS, SUITE 1650
                              LOS ANGELES, CA 90067







March 20, 2006

Jay Wolf
Chief Financial Officer
MediaVest, Inc
2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1650
Los Angeles, CA 90067

Dear Mr. Wolf:

Trinad Capital Master Fund, Ltd ("Trinad") hereby agrees to loan MediaVest, Inc.
(the "Company") up to a principal amount of $100,000 (the "Loan") at any time
and from time to time prior to the Company's consummation of a Next Financing
(as hereinafter defined). Trinad shall make advances to the Company in such
amounts as the Company shall request from time to time. The Loan shall bear
interest at 10% (ten percent) per annum. The entire outstanding principal amount
of the Loan and any accrued interest thereon shall be due and payable by the
Company upon, and not prior to, the consummation of a sale of securities (other
than a sale of shares of the Company's Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
(the "Common Stock"), to officers, directors or employees of, or consultants to,
the Company in connection with their provision of services to the Company), to a
third party or parties with proceeds to the Company of not less than $200,000 (a
"Next Financing").

Please acknowledge the Company's acceptance of the terms of this letter
agreement by signing where indicated below.

                                                Sincerely,

                                                Trinad Capital Master Fund, Ltd

                                                By: /s/ Robert Ellin
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                Name: Robert Ellin
                                                Title: Director
Acknowledged and agreed to:

MediaVest, Inc.

By: /s/ Jay Wolf
    ----------------------------
Name: Jay Wolf
Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### §§ 236.715-236.716 [Reserved]