alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Milton Schnaier, Respondent, *v.*The Onward Construction Company et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.

Reported below, 138 App. Div. 909.

(Argued November 14, 1910;

decided November 22, 1910.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 22, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee in an action to foreclose a mechauic’s lien; also a motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of said Appellate Division, entered June 8, 1910, affirming three intermediate orders in the action.

The motions were made upon the ground that the Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction to review the appeals.

*Milton Mayer*for motion.

*L. Laflin Kellogg*opposed.

Motions denied, with ten dollars costs.
§ 350.413 What are the Federal and recipient shares of costs incurred under the High Priority Program? ( a ) *Federal share.* FMCSA will reimburse at least 85 percent of the eligible costs incurred under the High Priority Program.
( b ) *Match.* In-kind contributions are acceptable in meeting the recipient's matching share under the High Priority Program if they represent eligible costs, as established by 2 CFR parts 200 and 1201 and FMCSA in the NOFO.
( c ) *Waiver.* The Administrator reserves the right to reduce or waive the recipient's matching share in any fiscal year: ( 1 ) As announced in the NOFO; or
( 2 ) As determined by the Administrator on a case-by-case basis.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 971 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 971

To require that payment be guaranteed whenever any supplier of electric 
  energy is required to sell electric energy to a purchaser under the 
emergency authority of section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2001

    Mr. Walden of Oregon (for himself, Mr. Simpson, and Mr. Inslee) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require that payment be guaranteed whenever any supplier of electric 
  energy is required to sell electric energy to a purchaser under the 
emergency authority of section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GUARANTEE OF PAYMENT REQUIRED FOR CERTAIN EMERGENCY POWER 
              SALES.

    Section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 825(c)) is 
amended by adding the following at the end thereof: ``No order may be 
issued under this subsection unless the payment of compensation or 
reimbursement to the person subject to such order is fully guaranteed 
by the United States government or by a State government.''.
                                 <all>
```
The Honorable Thomas E. Perez

Secretary

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20210

July 21, 2015

Re: Conflict of Interest Proposed Rule

Dear Secretary Perez:

Nobel Laureate, Robert Shiller, issued a call for greater access to professional financial 

advice (Shiller, 2009), yet such advice much be in the interest of the consumer. However, many 

individuals are confused about the standard of care to which a financial advisor is held (Hung, 

2008), and this confusion certainly relates to retirement assets.

Consumers typically expect that professional financial advisors will act in the best 

interest of their clients. Now is the time to align what investors think they are receiving with 

what they are actually receiving. As the Financial Planning Coalition argued, the re-proposed 

fiduciary standard of care rule is “overdue, needed, and workable.” (Financial Planning 

Coalition, 2015a).

I encourage you to carefully review the letter you received from the Financial Planning 

Coalition (Financial Planning Coalition, 2015b). Most importantly, please note the extensive 

research they cite suggesting that access to financial advice will not be dramatically impacted by 

a fiduciary standard of care. Also, please consider the helpful adjustments to the proposed rule 

that the Coalition proposes, which will only enhance the workability of the rule.

Thank you for your time in considering this very important matter.

Best regards,

Benjamin F. Cummings, Ph.D.

Assistant Professor

Finance Department

Saint Joseph’s University

benjamin.cummings@sju.edu

(610) 660-2239
References:

Financial Planning Coalition. (2015a, July 15). Financial planning coalition voices strong 

support for the Department of Labor’s re-proposed fiduciary rule in comment letter. 

Retrieved from http://financialplanningcoalition.com/coalition-fiduciary-rule-commentletter/

Financial Planning Coalition (2015b, July 15). Re: Proposed conflict of interest rule and related 

proposals, RIN-1210-AB32. Retrieved from http://financialplanningcoalition.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/07/Financial-Planning-Coalition-DOL-Comment-Letter.pdf

Hung, A.A., Clancy, N., Dominitz, J., Talley, E., Berrebi, C., and Suvankulov, F. (2008).

Investor and industry perspectives on investment advisors and broker-dealers. RAND 

Institute for Civil Justice, sponsored by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Shiller, R.J. (2009, January 18). How about a stimulus for financial advice? New York Times, 

p. BU5.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-69741 on Form S-3 ofour reports dated February 25, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements andfinancial statement schedules of CNA Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (which report expressedunqualified opinions and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the change in the method ofaccounting for certain separate account products in 2004) and relating to management’s report ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report onForm 10-K of CNA Financial Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
#### George Kozak, Respondent, *v.*The Erie Railroad Company, Appellant.

*Kozak*v. *Erie R. R.*Co., 135 App. Div. 726, affirmed.

(Argued April 7, 1911;

decided April 25, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 16, 1909, which reversed an order of the court at a Trial Term setting aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff and dismissing the complaint and directed the reinstatement of said verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by *535plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, his employer.

*Charles A. Collin*and *Elbert N. Oakes*for appellant.

*John C. Robinson*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Cray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisoock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0510.html[7/20/2015 7:48:21 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-4608

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0510

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Michael Allen

General Comment

Leave me alone. Do not touch my 401K plan. You cannot even manage Social Security what make you think you

 can manage my 401K?
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0683.html[7/21/2015 8:34:35 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-98qs

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0683

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: arin tegtman

General Comment

The federal government cannot even reach a consensus for a balanced budget, and does not have any right to tell

 me how to save for my retirement. Get off of my rights, if you want to live in a socialist country, get out of my

 Republic! DOWN WITH BIG GOVERNMENT!
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A.
Morrissey, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ John A. Morrissey
------------------------------
Name: John A. Morrissey
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 29, 2005

                                       44
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, April 7, 1995 (58), Para 58.2 Approval of the Journal]
[Page 601]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.58.2  approval of the journal

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BURTON, announced he had examined and 
approved the Journal of the proceedings of Thursday, April 6, 1995.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal was approved.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, November 2, 1995 (139), Para 139.7 Motion to Instruct Conferees--H.R. 2099]
[Page 1829]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.139.7  motion to instruct conferees--h.r. 2099

  Mr. STOKES moved that the managers on the part of the House at the 
conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on H.R. 2099, be 
instructed to agree to the amendment of the Senate numbered 66 insofar 
as it strikes 17 provisions limiting the use of funds appropriated to 
the Environmental Protection Agency.
  After debate,
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 365

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 365 appear at 66 FR 49870, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 365.203 Time for filing.

A protest shall be filed (received at the FMCSA, Office of Registration and Safety Information (MC-RS), 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590) within 10 days after notice of the application appears in the FMCSA Register. A copy of the protest shall be sent to applicant's representative at the same time. Failure timely to file a protest waives further participation in the proceeding

[80 FR 63705, Oct. 21, 2015, as amended at 84 FR 51432, Sept. 30, 2019]

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 82 FR 5300, Jan. 17, 2017, § 365.203 was suspended, effective Jan. 14, 2017. At 84 FR 51432, Sept. 30, 2019, the suspension was lifted and amendments were made to § 365.203. In that same document, § 365.203 was again suspended indefinitely.
§ 236.1017 Independent third party Verification and Validation. ( a ) The PTCSP must be supported by an independent third-party assessment when the Associate Administrator concludes that it is necessary based upon the criteria set forth in § 236.913, with the exception that consideration of the methodology used in the risk assessment (§ 236.913(g)(2)(vii)) shall apply only to the extent that a comparative risk assessment was required. To the extent practicable, FRA makes this determination not later than review of the PTCIP and the accompanying PTCDP or PTCSP. If an independent assessment is required, the assessment may apply to the entire system or a designated portion of the system.
( b ) If a PTC system is to undergo an independent assessment in accordance with this section, the host railroad may submit to the Associate Administrator a written request that FRA confirm whether a particular entity would be considered an independent third party pursuant to this section. The request should include supporting information identified in paragraph (c) of this section. FRA may request further information to make a determination or provide its determination in writing.
( c ) As used in this section, “independent third party” means a technically competent entity responsible to and compensated by the railroad (or an association on behalf of one or more railroads) that is independent of the PTC system supplier and vendor. An entity that is owned or controlled by the supplier or vendor, that is under common ownership or control with the supplier or vendor, or that is otherwise involved in the development of the PTC system is not considered “independent” within the meaning of this section.
( d ) The independent third-party assessment shall, at a minimum, consist of the activities and result in the production of documentation meeting the requirements of Appendix F to this part, unless excepted by this part or by FRA order or waiver.
( e ) Information provided that has been certified under the auspices of a foreign railroad regulatory entity recognized by the Associate Administrator may, at the Associate Administrator's discretion, be accepted as having been independently verified.
§ 222.59 When may a wayside horn be used? ( a ) ( 1 ) A wayside horn conforming to the requirements of appendix E of this part may be used in lieu of a locomotive horn at any highway-rail grade crossing equipped with an active warning system consisting of, at a minimum, flashing lights and gates.
( 2 ) A wayside horn conforming to the requirements of appendix E of this part may be installed within a quiet zone. For purposes of calculating the length of a quiet zone, the presence of a wayside horn at a highway-grade crossing within a quiet zone shall be considered in the same manner as a grade crossing treated with an SSM. A grade crossing equipped with a wayside horn shall not be considered in calculating the Quiet Zone Risk Index or Crossing Corridor Risk Index.
( b ) A public authority installing a wayside horn at a grade crossing within a quiet zone shall provide written notice that a wayside horn is being installed to all railroads operating over the public highway-rail grade crossings within the quiet zone, the highway or traffic control authority or law enforcement authority having control over vehicular traffic at the crossings within the quiet zone, the landowner having control over any private crossings within the quiet zone, the State agency responsible for grade crossing safety, the State agency responsible for highway and road safety, and the Associate Administrator. This notice shall provide the date on which the wayside horn will be operational and identify the grade crossing at which the wayside horn shall be installed by both the U.S. DOT National Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Inventory Number and street or highway name. The railroad or public authority shall provide notification of the operational date at least 21 days in advance.
( c ) A railroad or public authority installing a wayside horn at a grade crossing located outside a quiet zone shall provide written notice that a wayside horn is being installed to all railroads operating over the public highway-rail grade crossing, the highway or traffic control authority or law enforcement authority having control over vehicular traffic at the crossing, the State agency responsible for grade crossing safety, the State agency responsible for highway and road safety, and the Associate Administrator. This notice shall provide the date on which the wayside horn will be operational and identify the grade crossing at which the wayside horn shall be installed by both the U.S. DOT National Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Inventory Number and street or highway name. The railroad or public authority shall provide notification of the operational date at least 21 days in advance.
( d ) A railroad operating over a grade crossing equipped with an operational wayside horn installed within a quiet zone pursuant to this section shall cease routine locomotive horn use at the grade crossing. A railroad operating over a grade crossing that is equipped with a wayside horn and located outside of a quiet zone shall cease routine locomotive horn use at the grade crossing on the operational date specified in the notice required by paragraph (c) of this section.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyj-hw9n

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2198

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

You folks are completely missing the point, and making a mockery out of our country 

leadership. Do any of you really know what you are doing? By looking at the original drafts of 

the proposals it appears not, in my respectful opinion. I wish I had the opportunity to enact 

legislation that would make you all do your jobs better. Wouldn't you be excited about that?

Sincerely concerned,
-----Original Message-----

From: AARP [mailto:aarpwebact@action.aarp.org] 

Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 10:54 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Department of Labor

May 7, 2015

Department of Labor

Dear Labor,

To the Department of Labor:

It is in the interest of all Americans that the Fiduciary standard be the standard that all financial advisers 

adhere to. The best interest of the individual must always be the focus of financial advise. The 

Suitability standard does not provide the protection to the consumer that is necessary in the volatile 

world of finance. We must hold all financial advisers to the Fiduciary standard; as individuals we take 

actions in life that ensure our best interest, so to must those financial advisers. Over $17 Billion dollars 

was lost last year because of hidden fees , unfair risk taking and bad advise; this is a catastrophic 

misfortune that impacts the security of an aging society.

Protect the interests of all Americans NOW, close the Loophole, implement the Fiduciary standard and 

we will achieve a stronger America.

It is only right that financial professionals adhere to the highest standard, the double standard of 

Suitability places the financial security of an aging people at risk.

Richard Chevrefils

9 Camelia Ave. Unit 6

Concord, NH 03301

r.chevrefils@comcast.net

Sincerely,

Mr. Richard Chevrefils

9 Camelia Ave.

Unit 6

Concord, NH 03301

(603) 224-9077
Summary of Directions for the Approved/Proposed Uses of METRAFENONE.

Use Site

Aerial and/or 

Ground 

Application 

Identified by 

Equipment/Lab

el Restriction

Applicatio

n Method 

Type 

Desc

Formulation 

Desc

Application 

Rate (lb 

ai/A)

Max 

Single 

App 

Rate(lb 

ai/A)

Max # 

Apps / 

Year

A. I. Max App 

Rate/Year (lb 

ai/A)

Minimum 

Retreatment 

Interval

Registration 

Numbers

Use Directions and Limitations

Grapes

Ground, 

handheld, aerial

Broadcast. 

Foliar 

application Liquid (SC) 0.2-0.3 0.3 3 0.9 14 7969-284

No more than two sequential treatments 

before another mode of action

Pome

Ground, 

handheld, aerial

Broadcast. 

Foliar 

application Liquid (SC) 0.2-0.3 0.3 3 0.9 7 7969-284

No more than two sequential treatments 

before another mode of action
§ 31.26 Filing, form, and service of papers. ( a ) *Filing and form.* ( 1 ) A party filing any document under this part shall submit ( i ) the original and two copies to the Docket Operation Services, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590; and
( ii ) two copies simultaneously to the ALJ or, if on appeal, to the authority head. The requirements of this paragraph apply to all filings under this part, regardless of whether there is a cross-reference to § 31.26.
( 2 ) Every pleading and paper filed in the proceeding shall contain a caption setting forth the title of the action, the case number assigned by the Docket Clerk, and a designation of the paper (*e.g.,* motion to quash subpoena).
( 3 ) Every pleading and paper shall be signed by, and shall contain the address and telephone nunber of, the party or the person on whose behalf the paper was filed, or his or her representative.
( 4 ) Papers are considered filed when they are mailed. Date of mailing may be established by a certificate from the party or its representative or by proof that the document was sent by certified or registered mail.
( b ) *Service.* A party filing a document shall, at the time of filing, serve a copy of such document on every other party. Service upon any party of any document other than those required to be served as prescribed in § 31.8 shall be made by delivering a copy, or by placing a copy of the document in the United States mail, postage prepaid and addressed, to the party's last known address. When a party is represented by a representative, service shall be made upon such representative in lieu of the actual party.
( c ) *Proof of service.* A certificate of the individual serving the document by personal delivery or by mail, setting forth the manner of service, shall be proof of service.
[53 FR 881, Jan. 14, 1988, as amended at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008]
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Robert V. Condon, Chief Financial Officer of Merrimac
Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
     July 3, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
     date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements
     of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

/s/ Robert V. Condon
------------------------
Robert V. Condon
Chief Financial Officer
August 17, 2004

                                       27
```