alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: oliver.ds@gmail.com [mailto:oliver.ds@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:47 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

In my community, lack of funding for mental health care led to a fatal 

shooting of a high school student in a local restaurant. It rocked our 

community. 

So you can imagine that I support the interim final rule under the 

Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 1210-AB30). 

Cutting off mental health care may create short-term gains, but it's at 

the cost of huge long-term losses. Even when the loss isn't as dramatic 

as a shooting, many people's lives are badly affected when mental 

health care is ruled out for lack of funds. Whole families can go down. 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Denise Oliver 

P.O. Box 553 

Nevada City,, CA 95959
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, November 2, 1995 (139), Para 139.19 Hour of Meeting]
[Page 1871]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.139.19  hour of meeting

  On motion of Mr. ARMEY, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That when the House adjourns on Monday, November 6, 1995, it 
adjourn to meet at 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, November 7, 1995, for morning 
hour debates.
```
Docket: IRS-2009-0008 

Request for Information for Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 

2008 

Comment On: IRS-2009-0008-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: IRS-2009-0008-0095 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-09629 

Submitter Information 

General Comment 

I am a doctoral level licensed professional counselor who provides biofeedback to 

children with headache disorders. Over the past 25 years, multiple research 

studies have been performed that have shown efficacy for treating pediatric 

headaches. This has been endorsed by the American Headache Society and the 

College of Child Neurology as a significant component to treatment combined with 

medicine. Unfortunately, this service has been denied by Aetna, United 

Behavioral Health, Cigna Behavioral Health, Amerigroup, and Blue Cross Blue 

Shield and thus, potential patients that could benefit from this treatment - cannot 

due to out of pocket costs. The typical reasons for this lack of coverage are: 1) 

Biofeedback is not covered for mental health disorders, or 2) There is not sufficient 

evidence that biofeedback is effective. There are many routine medical and 

surgical procedures which have far fewer research studies about their efficacy than 

biofeedback. These medical and surgical procedures are generally not limited 

because of concerns about how many controlled studies have been performed. 

I believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity statue 

should require that employers and plans pay for the same range and scope of 

services for behavioral treatments as they do for medical and surgical benefits. 

Today, plans are being more restrictive in how they review evidenced based 

mental health and substance abuse treatments when compared to medical and 

surgical treatments. This violates both the intent and letter of the parity statute 

and we hope that the regulations will clarify that this cannot continue. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 29, 2009 

Tracking No. 809bc203 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009
§ 26.13 What assurances must recipients and contractors make? ( a ) Each financial assistance agreement you sign with a DOT operating administration (or a primary recipient) must include the following assurance: The recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of any DOT-assisted contract or in the administration of its DBE program or the requirements 49 CFR part 26. The recipient shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts. The recipient's DBE program, as required by 49 CFR part 26 and as approved by DOT, is incorporated by reference in this agreement. Implementation of this program is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this agreement. Upon notification to the recipient of its failure to carry out its approved program, the Department may impose sanctions as provided for under 49 CFR part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.).
( b ) Each contract you sign with a contractor (and each subcontract the prime contractor signs with a subcontractor) must include the following assurance: The contractor, sub recipient or subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this contract. The contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR part 26 in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy as the recipient deems appropriate, which may include, but is not limited to: ( 1 ) Withholding monthly progress payments;
( 2 ) Assessing sanctions;
( 3 ) Liquidated damages; and/or
( 4 ) Disqualifying the contractor from future bidding as non-responsible.
[79 FR 59593, Oct. 2, 2014]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, October 30, 1995 (136), Para 136.28 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1803]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.136.28  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. YOUNG of Alaska: Committee on Resources. H.R. 238. A 
     bill to provide for the protection of wild horses within the 
     Ozark National Scenic Riverways and prohibit the removal of 
     such horses; with an amendment (Rept. No. 104-296). Referred 
     to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the 
     Union.
       Mr. QUILLEN: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 248. 
     Resolution waiving points of order against the conference 
     report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1905) making 
     appropriations for energy and water development for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes 
     (Rept. No. 104-297). Referred to the House Calendar.
       Mr. GOSS: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 249. 
     Resolution waiving points of order against the conference 
     report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1868) making 
     appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, and 
     related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
     1996, and for other purposes (Rept. No. 104-298). Referred to 
     the House Calendar.
       Mr. SHUSTER: Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure. H.R. 1788. A bill to reform the statutes 
     relating to Amtrak, to authorize appropriations for Amtrak, 
     and for other purposes; with an amendment (Rept. No. 104-
     299). Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
     State of the Union.
```
§ 214.527 On-track roadway maintenance machines; inspection for compliance and schedule for repairs. ( a ) The operator of an on-track roadway maintenance machine shall check the machine components for compliance with this subpart, prior to using the machine at the start of the operator's work shift.
( b ) Any non-complying condition that cannot be repaired immediately shall be tagged and dated in a manner prescribed by the employer and reported to the designated official.
( c ) The operation of an on-track roadway maintenance machine with a non-complying condition shall be governed by the following requirements: ( 1 ) An on-track roadway maintenance machine with headlights or work lights that are not in compliance may be operated for a period not exceeding 7 calendar days and only during the period between one-half hour before sunrise and one-half hour after sunset;
( 2 ) A portable horn may be substituted for a non-complying or missing horn for a period not exceeding seven calendar days;
( 3 ) A fire extinguisher readily available for use may temporarily replace a missing, defective or discharged fire extinguisher on a new on-track roadway maintenance machine for a period not exceeding 7 calendar days, pending the permanent replacement or repair of the missing, defective or used fire extinguisher;
( 4 ) Non-complying automatic change-of-direction alarms, backup alarms, and 360-degree intermittent warning lights or beacons shall be repaired or replaced as soon as practicable within 7 calendar days; and
( 5 ) A structurally defective or missing operator's seat shall be replaced or repaired within 24 hours or by the start of the machine's next tour of duty, whichever is later. The machine may be operated for the remainder of the operator's tour of duty if the defective or missing operator's seat does not prevent its safe operation.
| Next Section 

Home | Table            of Contents | Introduction | Prevalence            of CSHCN | Health and Functional Status of CSHCN | HealthInsurance Coverage | Health Care Needs and Access to Care | CareCoordination | Family-CenteredCare | Impacton Families |  StateData Pages | Appendix | Footnotes

**Suggested citation:**  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services    Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau. *The National Survey    of Children with Special Health Care Needs Chartbook 2001*. Rockville,    Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2004. 

Individual copies of this report are available at no cost         from the HRSA Information Center, P.O. Box 2910, Merrifield, VA 22116,         1-888-ASK-HRSA or (703) 442-9051. The publication is also available online         at www.cdc.gov/nchs/slaits.htm         and www.mchb.hrsa.gov |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 22.67 Delinquent loans and loan defaults. ( a ) The Participating Lender must bring to the immediate attention of the Director any delinquent STLP loans. The Participating Lender and DOT OSDBU are jointly responsible for establishing collection procedures and must exercise due diligence with respect to collection of delinquent debt. The Participating Lender is responsible for initiating actions to recover such debt. DOT OSDBU must approve any compromise of a claim, resolution of a dispute, suspension or termination of collection action, or referral for litigation. A work-out solution will only be considered if it is expected to minimize the cost to the federal government in resolving repayment delinquencies and/or loan default. They must only be used when the borrower is likely to be able to repay the loan under the terms of the work-out, and if the cost of establishing the work-out plan is less than the costs of loan default and/or foreclosure.
( b ) In an appropriate situation, DOT OSDBU may authorize the Participating Lender to undertake legal action deemed necessary to collect delinquent loans and DOT will reimburse the Participating Lender on a pro rata basis in proportion to the loan guarantee percentage for the associated fees and costs, with prior authorization from the Director. Penalties and late fees are not eligible for reimbursement. Any legal action undertaken by the Participating Lender without OSDBU authorization will not be eligible for a pro rata basis reimbursement of the associated fees and costs. Net recoveries applicable to accrued interest must be applied on a pro rata basis in proportion to the formula used during the term of the loan.
§ 194.7 Operating restrictions and interim operating authorization. ( a ) An operator of a pipeline for which a response plan is required under § 194.101, may not handle, store, or transport oil in that pipeline unless the operator has submitted a response plan meeting the requirements of this part.
( b ) An operator must operate its onshore pipeline facilities in accordance with the applicable response plan.
( c ) The operator of a pipeline line section described in § 194.103(c), may continue to operate the pipeline for two years after the date of submission of a response plan, pending approval or disapproval of that plan, only if the operator has submitted the certification required by § 194.119(e).
[Amdt. 194-4, 70 FR 8746, Feb. 23, 2005]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, November 7, 1995 (141), Para 141.10 Smithsonian Board of Regents]
[Page 1875]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.141.10  smithsonian board of regents

  Mr. THOMAS moved to suspend the rules and pass the joint resolution 
(H. J. Res. 112) providing for the appointment of Louis Gerstner as a 
citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, recognized Mr. THOMAS and Mr. 
HOYER, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said joint resolution?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  Mr. HILLEARY demanded that the vote be taken by the yeas and nays, 
which demand was supported by one-fifth of the Members present, so the 
yeas and nays were ordered.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced that further proceedings on the motion were postponed.
```
#### § 236.406 [Reserved]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0708.html[7/21/2015 10:00:32 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-pv69

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0708

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Patricia Jones

General Comment

Leave my retirement funds alone! I don't need any government agency telling me what I can or can't do with

 them. I earned them.

Patricia Jones
#### John H. Browning, *Appellant, v.*Oliver W. Marvin, *Respondent.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Brady,'J.
§ 271.303 Amendments. ( a ) *Consultation requirements.* ( 1 ) For substantive amendments, a railroad shall follow the process, described in its RRP plan pursuant to § 271.209, for consulting with its directly affected employees and submitting a consultation statement to FRA. The requirements of this paragraph (a)(1) do not apply to non-substantive amendments (*e.g.,* amendments that update names and addresses of railroad personnel).
( 2 ) If a railroad and its directly affected employees cannot reach agreement on the proposed contents of a substantive amendment, the directly affected employees may file a statement with FRA under the procedures in § 271.207(e)(1). A railroad's directly affected employees have 15 days following the railroad's submission of a proposed amendment to submit the statement described in this paragraph.
( b ) *Filing.* ( 1 ) A railroad shall submit any amendment(s) to its approved RRP plan to FRA's Associate Administrator not less than 60 days before the proposed effective date of the amendment(s). The railroad shall file the amendment(s) with a cover letter outlining the proposed change(s) to the approved RRP plan.
( 2 ) If the proposed amendment is limited to adding or changing a name, title, address, or telephone number of a person, FRA approval is not required under the process of this section, although the railroad shall still file the amended RRP plan with FRA's Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety and Chief Safety Officer. These proposed amendments may be implemented by the railroad upon filing with FRA. All other proposed amendments must comply with the formal approval process described by this section.
( c ) *Review.* ( 1 ) FRA will review a proposed amendment to an RRP plan within 45 days of receipt. FRA will then notify the primary contact person of the railroad regarding whether FRA has approved the proposed amendment. FRA will also provide this notification to each individual identified in the service list accompanying the consultation statement required under paragraph (a)(1) of this section. If not approved, FRA will inform the railroad and the individuals identified in the service list of the specific points in which the proposed amendment is deficient.
( 2 ) If FRA has not notified the railroad and the individuals identified in the service list by the proposed effective date of the amendment whether the amendment has been approved or not, the railroad may implement the amendment, subject to FRA's decision.
( 3 ) If a proposed RRP plan amendment is not approved by FRA, no later than 60 days following the receipt of FRA's written notice, the railroad shall either provide FRA a corrected copy of the amendment that addresses all deficiencies noted by FRA or notice that the railroad is retracting the amendment.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1098.html[7/22/2015 10:55:29 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-nlij

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1098

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: David Marion

General Comment

I have saved and planned for myself and my family. I have a higher power than any man or government that

 directs me and takes care of me. The government should have no say in my finances. What makes them think

 they can take care of me better than I can take care of myself. Leave my IRA an savings that I have built for my

 retirement alone.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1028.html[7/22/2015 6:47:14 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-q770

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1028

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Terry Darcey

General Comment

I can manage my own finances without these cheating, lying, stealing, manipulative, country killing thieves !!!!

 All I have seen over the years and especially the last 24 years is enough for anyone to go postal on the so-called

 government "leadership". All I have seen is over spending in every sector of government. With their "plan" to

 control my money that I have WORKED for and saved ON MY OWN is ludicrous !!! If the so-called leaders of

 this country would have to work at a real job and be subjected to the CRA* we are subjected to by their idiotic

 "ideals", taxes, rules, judgements and "laws" ( which is damn overkill by the nut bag in the White House who

 over uses Executive Order like a 2 year old who can't have his way ) then things would be in a different light.

 LEAVE MY MONEY ALONE -- GET A REAL JOB -- GO THE HELL OUT OF MY LIFE !!!!!! America is

 getting real close to being a third rate country due to over credit, over spending and unnecessary spending.

 When the Chinese and all creditors come calling for the IOU's to be paid don't you damn well touch my money

 !!!! You politicians got us in this mess then you can damn well use your own money ( probably most of it stolen

 ) to pay off the debts !!! Oh yeah, by the way, we might want to learn Chinese and Spanish since China owns

 most of American debt and Spanish since their is more Spanish speaking people than AMERICAN ENGLISH

 !!!!!
#### Eliza Craft, Appellant, v. James A. Seacod, Respondent.

«Judgment reversed, with costs. Opinions by

Barnard, P. J., and Pratt, J.
Exhibit 4





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul O. Richins, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Paul O. Richins


Paul O. Richins


Principal Financial Officer


August 5, 2010








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.