alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SEVENTH DISTRICT, AT AMARILLO

No. 07-14-00403-CV

In the Interest of M.E., a Child

(No. 83920-2 IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 2 OF POTTER COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

Motion fee

Reporter's record

Statewide efiling fee

Filing

Indigent

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee $10.00

$470.00

$20.00

$100.00

$25.00

$50.00 INDIGENT

UNKNOWN

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT Christine Edler

Potter County

Lynda Smith

Lynda Smith

Lynda Smith

Lynda Smith

Balance of costs owing to the Seventh Court of Appeals, Amarillo, Texas: $0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per

the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, VIVIAN LONG, CLERK OF THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of

the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears

of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the

Seventh District of Texas on May 29, 2015

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
Page 1 of 2 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

Docket; lFLS-ZMK!&9p8 

Request lijr lnfomation for Paul W ellstone and Pctc Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: !K S-200C)-OOO8--C~oC~J 

Rcquest for lnfomation Regarding the Paul Welistone and Pctc Lhmenici Mental Health Parity 

and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: IRS,20094ClW402 I 

Commmt nn FR Doc # EI.1-09629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Dr Johi salerno 

Address: 

solcbury, PA, 

Organkation: Neurophy siology Assnciates 

General Comment 

Comrnents regding Regulatory Guidancc U SCG-2007-27022 page 1 9 15 7, I1 B 

specific areas 1 and 4 

I am a naropsychologist who providcs EEG biofeedback treatment to individuals with 

Allalt ion Defidt Hyperactivity Dkrdcr. EEG bio feedbck is an empirically validated 

and widely recognized, effective, non-medication treatmcnt for ADHD as well as other 

conditions. There are over 550 studies evaluating the effectiveness of EEG biofeedback 

treatmen1 of AUHD, Substance I Ise disorders. Autism, and other neurotogical 

conditions. A reccnt review of this literature concluded "EEG biofeedback mcets the 

American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry criteria for" Cliniwl 

I~uide1ines"for treatment of ADHD. " This means that EEG biofeedback meets thc same 

criteria as medication for trcating ADllD, and that EEG biofeedback "should always bc 

considered as an intervention for this disorder by the clinician." 

This service has bccn de~~ied byGeorgia Med~caid, Aetna, Ul~i red Behaviural Hualth, 

Blue Cross, Cigna, and Amerigroup. 

'I'his is a limitation of a effective arid validated treatmcnt thr n mental heait problem. 

'The reasons givcn by the insurance companies for this denial fell into two categories: 

1 ) our campany does not cover biofeedback for Mental Health problems or 2) there is 

not yet sufiicicnt evidence fur the eficacy of EEG biofeedback. As such, they are 

using evidence-haqed criteria tha! are far more rrstrict ive for mental health services 
than the cxitcria which are used for nledicallsurgical senriccs. There are many routine 

medical and surgical procedures whi~haw far fewer controlled studics about their 

efficacy than does EEG biofdback. There medical and surgical procedures art: 

generally not lirliited because of concerns about how many controlled studies have 

heen performed about them. 

Wc believe that the panty rcgulatiol~s, based on legal reviews of the parity statue 

should require that employers and plans pay for the same rangc md scope of servictss 

for Behavioral Treatments as they do fu Med Surg benefits and that a plan cannot be 

more restrictive in their managed care criteria arkd reviews for MI3 and SA disorders 

whcn compared to Mtxl Surg. Today plans are being more restrictive in how they 

review cvide~lce-based Mental Hcalth and Substance Abusc 7'reatments whcn 

compared to Md Surg treatments. This violates both the intent and letter nf the parity 

statute and we hopc that the repiations will clarify that this can't continue.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 17, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50172

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESUS ELIER GALLEGOS-GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-2024-ALL

--------------------

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jesus Elier

Gallergos-Garcia raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
From: Lee McDermett [mailto:mcdins@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 2:05 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

I don’t think the department of labor should be paid at all. Fire all of them. DOL stay out of the 

insurance and finance business.

Lee McDermett

McDermett Insurance Agency

(mail) Po Box 2520

 Forney TX 75126

Off 972-564-6866

Fax 972-292-7809

Cell 469-867-1800

Like us on Facebook Visit our Website www.mcdins.com

mcdins@hotmail.com

lee@mcdins.com
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Ridge Natural Resources, LLC, Calvin 

Smajstrla, Christopher Hawa and Wilson 

Hawa,

 

 Appellants,

v.

Double Eagle Royalty, LP,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00227-CV

Appeal from the

109th District Court

of Winkler County, Texas 

(TC# DC17-17111)

O R D E R

The Court has this day considered the Appellant’s emergency motion for temporary stay 

of trial court proceedings and concludes the motion should be GRANTED IN PART as follows. 

The trial court is authorized to conduct the hearing on the pending motion to compel discovery 

and to rule on said motion. The Honorable Martin B. Muncy shall stay all other proceedings in 

cause number DC17-17111, styled Ridge Natural Resources, LLC, Calvin Smajstrla, Christopher 

Hawa and Wilson Hawa v. Double Eagle Royalty, LP, pending resolution of this appeal or further 

order of this Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of December, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
Employee Benefits Security Administration
Office of Regulations and Interpretations
U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, NW

Room N-5655

Washington, DC 20210

Re: Definition of the Term “Fiduciary;” Conflict of Interest Rule —
Retirement Investment Advice
RIN 1210-AB32

Re: —_ Proposed Best Interest Contract Exemption
ZRIN 1210-ZA25

Re: Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited
Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving
Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Consultants, Insurance
Companies and Investment Company Principal Underwriters
ZRIN 1210-ZA25

To Whom it May Concern:

lam the President of the Idaho Farm Bureau Federation, a member of the Board of
Directors of Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company and am pleased to provide these
comments with respect to the Department of Labor’s notice of proposed rulemaking
concerning the Definition of the Term “Fiduciary” of an employee benefit plan (the
“Proposed Regulation”), the related proposed Best Interest Contract Exemption (the
“Proposed BIC Exemption”), and the proposed amendment to and proposed partial
revocation of prohibited transaction exemption 84-24 (the “Proposed PTE 84-24
Exemption Amendment”) (collectively, the “Proposal”).

The Idaho Farm Bureau Federation is a grassroots, statewide organization dedicated to
helping Idaho farm families prosper and improve their quality of life. More than 72,000
families in Idaho are Farm Bureau members, working together to achieve farm and rural
prosperity]. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company, is an lowa domiciled life insurance
company that markets life insurance and annuity products in the following states:
Arizona, Kansas, Idaho, lowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North
Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Utah, Wisconsin and Wyoming. Farm Bureau Life
Insurance Company provides insurance and financial services to Farm Bureau members
and others in rural areas of the West and Midwest that other insurers have long since
abandoned.


Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company is a member of both the American Council of Life
Insurers ("ACLI") and the Investment Retirement Institute ("IRI"). Our management has
been working closely with both organizations with respect to comment letters those
organizations are preparing and will be submitting in response to the above-referenced
proposal. We strongly support and endorse the positions in the comment letters of both
the ACLI and the IRI and ask that the Department of Labor address the issues raised in
the letters of those two associations.

Sincerely,

ip lO KO 2
/ ier (fiacsifr
Frank Priestley-President:

Idaho Farm Bureau Federation
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Coconino National Forest, USDA Forest Service, Arizona.

# ACTION:

Notice of new fee site. 

# SUMMARY:

The Coconino National Forest proposes to begin charging a new $75.00 per day fee for rental of the Apache Maid Cabin located 24 miles northeast of Rimrock, Arizona. Rental of the Cabin includes overnight use. Rental of the cabin and other facilities within the Arizona National Forests has shown that the public appreciates and enjoys the availability of historic rental facilities. Funds from the rentals will be used for the continued operation and maintenance of the Apache Maid Cabin.

# DATES:

Apache Maid Cabin will become available for rent January, 2008.

# ADDRESSES:

Red Rock Ranger District, Coconino National Forest, P.O. Box 20429, Sedona, AZ 86341.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bill Stafford, District Recreation Staff, Red Rock Ranger District, 928-203-7529.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act (Title VII, Pub. L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to public a six month advance notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     whenever new recreation fee areas are established. The Coconino National Forest currently has three other rental facilities. These facilities are booked regularly throughout the rental season. A business analysis for the rental of the Apache Maid Cabin shows that people desire having this sort of recreation experience on the Coconino National Forest. A market analysis indicates that the $75 daily fee is both reasonable and acceptable for this sort of unique recreation experience. People wanting to rent the Apache Maid Cabin will need to do so through the National Recreation Reservation Service, at                     *http://www.recreation.gov*                     or by calling 1-877-444-6777. The National Recreation Reservation Service charges a $9 fee per reservation.                

Dated: July 5, 2007.

Mark R. Sensibaugh,

Forest Supervisor, Coconino National Forest.

[FR Doc. 07-3429 Filed 7-12-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         162,607
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             199
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                87,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    229,849
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         574,502
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           579,483
<LOANS>                                      1,456,076
<ALLOWANCE>                                     22,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,748,237
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,937,864
<SHORT-TERM>                                   384,315
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             34,076
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       391,982
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,748,237
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                111,574
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               41,597
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,627
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               154,798
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              40,134
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,565
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          101,233
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,700
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 632
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 73,199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,591
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      59,591
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,528
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.90
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                      9,116
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,124
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   167
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                23,002
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,117
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,124
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               22,709
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 230.43 Gauge siphon.

The steam gauge supply pipe shall have a siphon on it of ample capacity to prevent steam from entering the gauge. The supply pipe shall directly enter the boiler and be maintained steam tight. The supply pipe and its connections shall be cleaned each time the gauge is tested.
§ 262.9 Criteria for selection of projects. Applicants must submit evidence sufficient for the FRA to determine whether projects proposed for Federal investment are cost-effective in terms of the benefits achieved in relation to the funds expended. To that end, the FRA will consider the anticipated public and private benefits associated with each rail line relocation or improvement project. In evaluating applications, FRA will consider the following factors in determining whether to grant an award to a State under this part. ( a ) The capability of the State to fund the rail line relocation project without Federal grant funding;
( b ) The requirement and limitation relating to allocation of grant funds provided in § 262.5;
( c ) Equitable treatment of various regions of the United States;
( d ) The effects of the rail line, relocated or improved as proposed, on motor vehicle and pedestrian traffic, safety, community quality of life, and area commerce;
( e ) The effects of the rail line, relocated as proposed, on the freight rail and passenger rail operations on the line;
( f ) Any other factors FRA determines to be relevant to assessing the effectiveness and/or efficiency of the grant application in achieving the goals of the national program, including the level of commitment of non-Federal and/or private funds to a project and the anticipated public and private benefits.
From: all.things.bright@hotmail.com 

[mailto:all.things.bright@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:33 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Elizabeth Rogers Drouillard 

2335 Lake Michigan Dr. NW 

Grand Rapids, MI 49504
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 5/18/15 3:00 PM

Received: May 18, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8ix2-6c2q

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0278

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: David Carson

Address: 

3628 N. Muskingum Ave

Odessa, TX, 79762

Email: carsondave@gmail.com

Phone: 4326383322

General Comment

Putting retirement account managers in a more fiduciary role to protect retirees is a good idea. 

Managers of retirement accounts should be looking out for the persons that own the accounts 

and not the company that holds them. Its our money and it should be invested in our best 

interest.

Thanks!

David Carson

Odessa, TX 

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481ae5f3d&format=xml&show... 5/18/2015
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0969.html[7/21/2015 6:59:02 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-g3hn

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0969

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Carl Shaffer

Address:

3545 regal road

Fort Worth, TX, 76111

Email: carlwshaffer@gmail.com

Phone: 817 532 7772

General Comment

I am utterly disgusted and fed up with a federal government thinking it has the right and a privilege to tell me

 what I have to do and what I cannot do with my own finances my own retirement my own health care. Just fed

 up with it. Stay out of my life I don't need you screwing with me and messing my life up. Go back to the

 government and stay out of my life.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Datakey, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Carl P. Boecher, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 9, 2002



| | /s/ Carl P. Boecher
Chief Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------
§ 24.9 Recordkeeping and reports. ( a ) *Records.* The agency shall maintain adequate records of its acquisition and displacement activities in sufficient detail to demonstrate compliance with this part. These records shall be retained for at least 3 years after each owner of a property and each person displaced from the property receives the final payment to which he or she is entitled under this part, or in accordance with the applicable regulations of the Federal funding agency, whichever is later.
( b ) *Confidentiality of records.* Records maintained by an agency in accordance with this part are confidential regarding their use as public information, unless applicable law provides otherwise.
( c ) *Reports.* Each Federal agency that has programs or projects requiring the acquisition of real property or causing a displacement from real property subject to the provisions of the Uniform Act shall provide to the Lead Agency an annual summary report by November 15 that describes the real property acquisitions, displacements, and related activities conducted by the Federal agency for the prior calendar year. (*See* appendix A to this part, section 24.9(c).)
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0790.html[7/21/2015 12:33:38 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-bgp5

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0790

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I can handle my retirement monies