alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: TnJoe1@aol.com [mailto:TnJoe1@aol.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 8:09 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 30, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

There IS no health without MENTAL HEALTH! 

Sincerely, 

Joseph Andrews 

4034 Cherokee Trl 

Lascassas, TN 37085
#### § 31.43 Collection of civil penalties and assessments.

Sections 3806 and 3808(b) of title 31, United States Code, authorize actions for collection of civil penalties and assessments imposed under this part and specify the procedures for such actions.
§ 29.307 What terms must a funding agreement include? A funding agreement must set forth the following: ( a ) The funds the Department will provide, including those funds provided on a recurring basis;
( b ) The PSFAs the Tribe intends to carry out using the funds;
( c ) The general budget category assigned to the funds;
( d ) The time and method of transfer of funds;
( e ) The responsibilities of the Department and the Tribe;
( f ) Any applicable statutory limitations on the use of funds;
( g ) Any statutory or negotiated reporting requirements;
( h ) Any applicable Federal or federally approved design, construction, and monitoring standards, or the Tribe's design, construction, and monitoring standards, if they are consistent with or exceed the Federal or federally approved standards;
( i ) Other Federal health and safety requirements that apply to the funds included in the funding agreement, or the Tribe provides adequate assurance that its relevant health and safety requirements are consistent with or exceed such requirements;
( j ) If the funding agreement includes TTP funds under 23 U.S.C. 202 and § 29.400(a), provisions related to planning, inventory, and allowable use of funds in 25 CFR part 170 necessary for administration of the TTP, consistent with the Program's goal to reduce administrative burdens on the Tribe, or Tribal provisions that meet or exceed those standards;
( k ) Any other provision agreed to by the Department and the Tribe, such as program oversight, accountability, annual reporting on expenditure of Federal funds, and technical assistance; and
( l ) Provisions authorizing the Department to terminate the funding agreement (in whole or in part) and reassume the remaining funding for transfer, as appropriate.
§ 29.503 How may the Federal Government make a claim against a Tribe relating to any disallowance of costs based on an audit conducted under this part? ( a ) *Disallowance of costs.* Any claim by the Federal Government against a Tribe relating to funds included in a funding agreement based on any audit conducted pursuant to this part is subject to 25 U.S.C. 5325(f). ( 1 ) Any right of action or other remedy (other than those relating to a criminal offense) relating to any disallowance of costs is barred unless the Department provides notice of such a disallowance within 365 days from receiving any required annual audit report. The notice must set forth the Tribe's appeal and hearing rights in accordance with §§ 29.912 through 29.923.
( 2 ) To calculate the 365-day period, an audit report is deemed received by the Department on the date of electronic submission to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. The Department has 60 days after receiving the audit report to give notice to the Tribe of its determination to reject an audit report as insufficient due to non-compliance with the applicable provisions of 2 CFR part 200 or any applicable statute.
( b ) *Criminal penalties.* Any person, officer, director, agent, employee, or person otherwise connected with a recipient of a contract, subcontract, grant, or sub-grant under a compact or funding agreement who embezzles, willfully misapplies, steals, or obtains by fraud any of the money, funds, assets, or property provided to the recipient will be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than 2 years, or both. If the amount of funds in question does not exceed $100, then the fine will be no more than $1,000 and imprisonment not more than 1 year, or both.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 139 (Friday, July 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 39811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3567]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

Date and Time: Thursday, July 26, 2007 at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status: This Meeting Will be Open to the Public.

Items to be Discussed: Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Advisory Opinion 2007-09: Kerry-Edwards 2004, Inc., and Kerry 
Edwards 2004 General Election Legal and Accounting Compliance 
(``GELAC'') Fund.
    Report of the Audit Division on Ted Poe for Congress.
    Management and Administrative Matters.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-3567 Filed 7-18-07; 2:46 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-07-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice is published in accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463). The topic of the meeting on September 11-13, 2007 are to review new start and continuing research and development projects requesting Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program funds in excess of $1M. This meeting is open to the public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with the Scientific Advisory Board at the time and in the manner permitted by the Board.

# DATES:

September 11-12, 2007 from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and September 13 from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

SERDP Program Office Conference Center, 901 North Stuart Street, Suite 804, Arlington, VA 22203.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Sharee Malcolm, SERDP Program Office, 901 North Stuart Street, Suite 303, Arlington, VA or by telephone at (703) 696-2119.

Dated: August 3, 2007.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 07-3880 Filed 8-8-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 146 (Tuesday, July 31, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 41818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3714]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Blue Ribbon Panel on VA-Medical School Affiliations; Notice of 
Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Blue Ribbon Panel 
on VA-Medical School Affiliations has scheduled a meeting for September 
21, 2007, in Room 542 at 1800 G Street, NW., Washington, DC from 8:30 
a.m. until 2 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Panel is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs, through the Under Secretary for Health, on issues related to a 
comprehensive philosophical framework to enhance VA's partnerships with 
medical schools and affiliated institutions.
    The panelists will review VA's current affiliations with medical 
schools and will receive background presentations and issue papers on 
various topics that are relevant to the Panel's deliberations.
    Interested persons may attend and present oral statements to the 
Panel. Oral presentations will be limited to five minutes or less, 
depending on the number of participants. Interested parties may also 
provide written comments for review by the Panel prior to the meeting 
or at any time, by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bafdd6d5c8d3db94f2d5d6d6dbd4defaccdb94ddd5cc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e5972716c777f30567172727f707a5e687f30797168">[email protected]</span></a> or by mail to Gloria 
J. Holland, Ph.D. Special Assistant for Policy and Planning to the 
Chief Academic Affiliations Officer, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., (14), 
Washington, DC 20420.

    Dated: July 25, 2007.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-3714 Filed 7-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0514.html[7/20/2015 7:58:53 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-q58z

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0514

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jonathan Hagy

General Comment

Just leave us law abiding citizens alone and go after the criminals invading our country from others.
Kellon.borden@pegasusanc.com phone: 907-243-3144 

3901 w. old international airport rd. • Anchorage, AK 99502 USA 

October 1, 2015

 

To Whom It May Concern, 

Pegasus Aviation Services, LLC (Air Agency Certificate Number UPUR695X and Certificated 

Satellite Repair Station UPUD695X) would like to submit this petition for an exemption from 

FAR Part 145, §145.103(b); which states, “A certificated repair station with an airframe rating 

must provide suitable permanent housing to enclose the largest type and model of aircraft listed 

on its operations specifications. 

Pegasus Aviation Services, LLC (PMX) would like this petition to cover the primary Certificated 

Repair Station (CRS) in Anchorage Alaska as well as any current or future D107 or Satellite 

Repair Station Locations. 

PMX’s current Operations Specifications grant a limited airframe and power plant rating so PMX 

may provide line maintenance, transit maintenance, and “A checks” for our customers. The nature 

of these transits include a short ground time with just enough time to provide crew transfer, 

fueling of the aircraft, and cargo movement as required. Due to the tight schedule in which our 

customers operate, any required line maintenance is expected to be performed at the aircraft 

parking location, which can vary on the airfield, allowing the other contracted services to be 

completed during maintenance. In the fifteen years of PMX’s existence, hanger maintenance has 

not been an issue due to the fact that Pegasus has the required equipment to ensure article 

protection and segregation as required from the elements and environment, while ensuring 

maintenance accuracy, per Federal Aviation Regulations as well as the Regulations imposed by 

our customer’s Authorities, in challenging work environments. PMX has temporary structures, 

heating units and storage equipment to ensure all maintenance is performed safely and securely in 

compliance with required regulations. The temporary structures mentioned can be used to both 

protect the articles being maintained and the Technicians performing the work to prevent 

impaired maintenance per the customer’s Continuous Airworthiness Maintenance Program 

(CAMP) and PMX’s Repair Station Manual (RSM) and Quality System Manual (QSM) 

especially during the longer ground times required for “A checks.” 

It is in the public’s interest to allow this exemption as doing so will allow our customer’s to 

operate in accordance with their maintenance programs at the outstation locations that PMX 

operates. 

Best Regards, 

Kellon Borden 

Quality System Manager & Director of Training 

907-317-3083 

Pegasus Aviation Services, LLC.
§ 24.503 Replacement housing payment for 90-day mobile home occupants. A displaced tenant or owner-occupant of a mobile home and/or site is eligible for a replacement housing payment, not to exceed $9,570, under § 24.402 if: ( a ) The person actually occupied the displacement mobile home on the displacement site for at least 90 days immediately prior to the initiation of negotiations;
( b ) The person meets the other basic eligibility requirements at § 24.402(a); and
( c ) The agency acquires the mobile home and/or mobile home site, or the mobile home is not acquired by the agency, but the agency determines that the occupant is displaced from the mobile home because of one of the circumstances described at § 24.502(a)(3).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-27-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-16-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,313,884
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    733,613
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,573,376
<PP&E>                                      71,973,541
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,575,398
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,536,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,599,898
<BONDS>                                     34,053,804
<COMMON>                                       413,008
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,387,172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,536,359
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,509,864
<CGS>                                        7,146,987
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,214,196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,740,983
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             796,164
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                702,080
<INCOME-TAX>                                   211,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            491,080
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   491,080
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:Research engineering annual report [electronic resource].**** 
SuDocNumber:NAS1.15/8:
ItemNumber:0830-D-06(online)
CGPsystem Number:000592070
 
1998
1999
2002
2003
2004
 
 **
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1232

XUE QIANG LIN,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 12-2080

XUE QIANG LIN,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals. 

Submitted: March 1, 2013 Decided: April 4, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
2

Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adedayo O. Idowu, LAW OFFICES OF ADEDAYO O. IDOWU, PLLC, New 

York, New York, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Acting 

Assistant Attorney General, Erica B. Miles, Senior Litigation 

Counsel, Jesse D. Lorenz, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated petitions for review, Xue Qiang 

Lin, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, 

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ 

(“Board”) orders (1) dismissing his appeal of the immigration 

judge’s order denying his application for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture 

(Appeal No. 12-1232), and (2) denying his motion to reopen 

removal proceedings (Appeal No. 12-2080). We have thoroughly 

reviewed the record, including Lin’s affidavit, the various 

supporting affidavits and documents presented to the immigration 

court, and the transcript of Lin’s merits hearing. We conclude 

that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to 

any of the Board’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252(b)(4)(B) (2006), and that substantial evidence supports 

the Board’s decision to uphold the immigration judge’s denial of 

Lin’s application for relief. See INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502 

U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for 

review in Appeal No. 12-1232 for the reasons stated by the 

Board. See In re: Xue Qiang Lin (B.I.A. Jan. 27, 2012). 

We turn then to the Board’s order denying Lin’s motion 

to reopen his removal proceedings. We have reviewed the record 

as relevant to that motion and conclude that the Board did not 

abuse its discretion in denying reopening in this case. See 8 
4

C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2012). We therefore deny the petition 

for review in Appeal No. 12-2080 for the reasons stated by the 

Board. See In re: Xue Qiang Lin (B.I.A. Aug. 7, 2012). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITIONS DENIED
Exhibit 10.3



	
 
		
 		
EXHIBIT 10.3 
	
	
 
		
 		

EXTRACT OF SHORT TERM BANK LOAN AGREEMENT 
	

	
 
	
	
 
	
	
Lender: 
		
 		
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank Nanjing Branch 
	
	
Borrower: 
		
 		
Goldenway Nanjing Garments Company Limited 
	
	
Amount: 
		
 		
Rmb 5,000,000 ($611,247) repayable on maturity 
	
	
Maturity: 
		
 		
August 23, 2006 
	
	
Interest rate: 
		
 		
0.5115% per month 
	
	
Security: 
		
 		
Guaranteed by Jiangsu Ever-Glory International Enterprise Group 
	



Executed on August 23, 2005.
#### Alexander Hamilton and others, *Respondents, v.*Charles Godfrey Gunther and others, *Appellants.*

Judgment upon order that the demurrers of appellants, were frivolous affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
§ 238.737 Luggage racks. ( a ) Overhead storage racks shall provide longitudinal and lateral restraint for stowed articles. These racks shall incorporate transverse dividers at a maximum spacing of 10 ft. (3 m) to restrain the longitudinal movement of luggage. To restrain the lateral movement of luggage, these racks shall also slope downward in the outboard direction at a minimum ratio of 1:8 with respect to a horizontal plane.
( b ) Luggage racks shall comply with the requirements in either of the following paragraphs: ( 1 ) Section 238.233; or
( 2 ) Section 6.8, “Luggage stowage,” of GM/RT2100, provided that— ( i ) The conditions of § 238.705(b)(2) are met;
( ii ) Attachment strength is sufficient to resist without failure individually applied loads of 5g longitudinal, 3g lateral, and 3g vertical; and
( iii ) Use of the standard is carried out under any conditions identified by the railroad, as approved by FRA. In particular, the railroad shall determine the maximum allowable weight of the luggage stowed for purposes of evaluating luggage rack attachment strength.
( c ) Railway Group Standard GM/RT2100, Issue Four, “Requirements for Rail Vehicle Structures,” December 2010 is incorporated by reference into this section with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at Federal Railroad Administration, Docket Clerk, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC and is available from Rail Safety and Standards Board Ltd., Communications, RSSB, Block 2 Angel Square, 1 Torrens Street, London, England EC1V 1NY, *www.rgsonline.co.uk*. It is also available for inspection at NARA. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html*.
§ 29.106 What are best practices to pursue negotiations? ( a ) The Department and the Tribe should collaborate and provide a clear explanation of their positions and interests. Each party should provide timely and specific responses to proposals presented during negotiations in order to conclude negotiations as soon as possible within the period provided in § 29.105.
( b ) In negotiating the applicable construction, design, monitoring, or health and safety requirements that apply to the PSFAs the Tribe carries out using funds included in a funding agreement, along with the other terms set forth in § 29.307, the Department and the Tribe should cooperate and the Department will prioritize the reduction of administrative requirements on the Tribe when negotiating the terms of the compact, funding agreement, or amendment to effectuate Tribal self-governance.
( c ) The Department and the Tribe should conduct the negotiations in order to reach agreement on as many items as possible, and to refine unresolved issues in order to avoid disputed terms. The negotiations should conclude with mutually agreed upon terms and conditions. If any unresolved issues remain, the Tribe may submit a final offer to the Department under subpart C of this part.