alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
R. Patrick Thornberry 

Associate 

r.patrick.thornberry@FaegreBD.com 

Direct +1 317 569 4625 

Faegre Baker Daniels LLP 

600 East 96th Street Suite 600 

Indianapolis Indiana 46240-3789 

Phone +1 317 569 9600 

Fax +1 317 569 4800

US.75941098.01

July 30, 2015 

United States Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Docket ID: FAA-2015-1755 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

In response to an email received from the Federal Aviation Administration on July 29, 2015 (the 

"Supplemental Request"), requesting additional information regarding the aircrafts to be used for 

CameraBee, LLC's ("CameraBee") proposed unmanned aircraft system ("UAS") operations, CameraBee 

submits this letter to supplement its original exemption request. 

 CameraBee proposes the use of the following UAS aircraft in connection with its proposed UAS 

operations: 

1. Make: Hoverfly Systems/Aeronavics, Model: Erista 8/Skyjib 8, Type: Rotorcraft, Maximum 

Weight: 42 lbs 

2. Make: Hoverfly Systems/ SkyHero, Model: Spyder 700 Quad, Type: Rotorcraft, Maximum 

Weight: 9lbs 

3. Make: Freefly Systems, Model: Alta, Type: Rotorcraft, Maximum Weight: 30lbs 

4. Make: Blade, Model: 350QX, Type: Rotorcraft, Maximum Weight: 24 oz 

In addition to the foregoing, CameraBee will simultaneously submit a copy of its Motion Picture and 

Television Operations Manual in accordance with the submission instructions for proprietary 

information provided in the Supplemental Request. 
 -2- July 30, 2015

US.75941098.01

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ R. Patrick Thornberry 

R. Patrick Thornberry 

RPTHORNB: 

cc: Derek Hammer 

President, CameraBee, LLC
1

No. 06-14-00020-CV 

________________________________________________________________ 

In the Court of Appeals of Texas 

Sixth District 

Texarkana, Texas 

________________________________________________________________ 

WENDOLYN MESSNER, DEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR

Appellant 

v. 

MARK L. BOON, BOON SHAVER ECHOLS COLEMAN & GOOLSBY, P.L.L.C.,

Appellees

________________________________________________________________ 

On Appeal from the 

County Court at Law of Rusk County, Texas 

Hon. Chad Wes Dean 

Trial Court Cause No. 02-043 A 

________________________________________________________________ 

APPELLANT’S SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR REHEARING

________________________________________________________________ 

 PAUL W. TURNER

 Texas Bar No. 24037619 

 400 S. Alamo, Suite A 

 Marshall, Texas 75670 

 (903) 935-0135 (phone) 

 (903) 935-0235 (facsimile) 

 pturner@thelawofficeofpwt.com

 COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT

 

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 1/7/2015 1:31:27 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
2

SUPPLEMENT TO ARGUMENT

In Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, Appellant argued that the Court had 

erred in some of its legal analysis on page 20 of its Opinion.1

 In an effort to more 

succinctly state the flaw in the Court’s analysis, Wendolyn submits this 

Appellant’s Supplement to Motion for Rehearing. 

 The Court has held that Wendolyn can brings claims against Boon for any 

negligent act that he committed during Delbert’s lifetime,2

 but she cannot bring 

claims for any negligent act that Boon committed during Bengel’s administration 

of Delbert’s estate because any such negligence was an injury to Bengel.3

 But, as 

the Court rightly observed on page 19 of its Opinion, Bengel stood in the shoes of 

Delbert as the executor of his estate. Therefore, an injury to Bengel was an injury 

to Delbert, and the Court has acknowledged that Wendolyn can bring claims for an 

injury to Delbert. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Paul W. Turner____________ 

 Paul W. Turner 

 Texas Bar No. 24037619 

 400 S. Alamo, Suite A 

 Marshall, Texas 75670 

 903-935-0135 (phone) 

 903-935-0235 (facsimile) 

 pturner@thelawofficeofpwt.com 

 Counsel for Appellant 

 

1

 Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, p. 15-18. 

2

 Opinion, p. 19. 

3

 Opinion, p. 20-21. 
3

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

The Appellant’s Supplement to Motion for Hearing contains 159 which, if 

the Court allows this Supplement, results in a total count of 4,616 words which 

exceeds the 4,500 word limit of with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i). 

Signed on January 7, 2015. 

 /s/ Paul W. Turner____________ 

 Paul W. Turner 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on January 7, 2015, I served a copy of Appellant’s Supplement 

to Motion for Rehearing on counsel for Appellees listed below by electronic 

service and the electronic transmission was reported as complete. My email 

address is pturner@thelawofficeofpwt.com. 

Michael L. Dunn 

Smead, Anderson & Dunn 

2110 Horseshoe Lane 

Longview, Texas 75605 

Counsel for Appellees Mark L. Boon and 

Boon Shaver Echols Coleman & Goolsby, P.L.L.C. 

 /s/ Paul W. Turner____________ 

 Paul W. Turner
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Nord Resources Corporation - Exhibit 10.12






Second Amendment
to the "Terms
of Agreement,
Option to Purchase the ‘Coyote Springs’ Property,

Graham County, Arizona”

This document is an amendment (“Amendment”) to the "Terms of
Agreement, Option to Purchase the ‘Coyote Springs’ Property, Graham County,
Arizona”" dated January 28, 2004 ("Agreement") between Nord Resources
Corporation ("Nord") and Thornwell Rogers, South Branch Resources, LLC, and
MRPGEO, LLC (collectively, the “Vendors”).

Whereas the original Agreement calls for the transfer of 16,666
shares of Nord common stock or US$16,670 to each of the Vendors, at Vendors
option, on the twenty-four (24) month anniversary of the signing of the
Agreement, such second anniversary date being January 28, 2006 and the parties
now desire to amend the Agreement.

Nord and Vendors hereby agree to modify the terms of this
transfer as follows. Nord shall not be required to pay to each Vendor either the
16,666 shares or the US$16,670 as defined above. In lieu of the above, Nord
shall pay to each Vendor US$7,000 on the date of this Amendment. In addition,
within five business days of January 28, 2006 or the execution of the necessary
Subscription Agreement by the Vendors, whichever occurs later, Nord shall convey
to each of the Vendors a number of common shares of Nord valued at $9,670. The
shares shall be priced at the ten day average closing price of the shares prior
to the anniversary date of January 28, 2006.

All other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.

Dated January 27, 2006

	Nord Resources Corporation 	 	Vendors: 
	 	  	 	 	  
	 	  	 	 	  
	By  	 /s/ Erland A. Anderson 	 	By  	/s/ Thornwell Roger
	 	  	 	 	Thornwell Rogers 
	Its 	President	 	 	  
	 	  	 	 	  
	 	  	 	By  	/s/ Daniel P. Laux
	 	  	 	 	South Branch Resources, LLC 
	 	  	 	 	  
	 	  	 	 	  
	 	  	 	By  	/s/ Michael R. Pawlowski
	 	  	 	 	MRPGEO, LLC
Date Completed: 7/20/2015 

Name: Dennis Lewis

Street Address: 223 Larcom Ln

City: Griffin State: Georgia Zip Code: 30224

Email: dennis.lewis62@gmail.com

Comments:

Dear Thomas Perez, I'm writing to urge the Department of Labor to reconsider the

proposed fiduciary rule that will significantly hurt the ability of many Americans to

save for retirement. This rule could even completely cut them off from receiving

investment advice. Under this proposed rule, many Americans who most need

access to quality and affordable retirement advice will lose it. The rule will impose

complex regulatory hurdles on financial advisors that would require significant, costly

changes to their business models. As a result, some advisors will reduce services to

individuals and small businesses that provide more than 9 million households

retirement plans. The rule will push financial advisors away from small businesses

and small balance accounts, leaving many Americans with no access to retirement

advice at all. The DOL must realize that its actions will seriously hurt small

businesses' ability to provide retirement savings options to employees and prevent

retail investors from receiving needed, affordable investment advice. The reality of

the fiduciary rule is that it will do more harm than good at a time when Americans

around the country cannot afford to put their retirement savings at risk. Rather than

proceeding down a too-costly regulatory path, the government should consider more

carefully whether there may exist prudent alternatives to achieve the desired

protections and benefits for retirement investors. I strongly oppose the rule, and urge

DOL to reconsider. Sincerely, Dennis Lewis 223 Larcom Ln Griffin, GA 30224
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1017.html[7/22/2015 6:38:03 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-lp2o

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1017

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: William Ackley

General Comment

I can plan effectively for my own retirement. These extra regulations are not necessary.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 29, 1995 (123), Para 123.38 Enrolled Bill and Joint Resolution Signed]
[Page 1492]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.123.38  enrolled bill and joint resolution signed

  Mr. THOMAS, from the Committee on House Oversight, reported that that 
committee had examined and found truly enrolled a bill and a joint 
resolution of the House of the following titles, which were thereupon 
signed by the Speaker:

       H.R. 2399. An Act to amend the Truth in Lending Act to 
     clarify the intent of such Act and to reduce burdensome 
     regulatory requirements on creditors; and
       H.J. Res. 108. Joint resolution making continuing 
     appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and for other 
     purposes.
```
§ 260.41 Inspection and reporting. ( a ) Equipment or facilities subject to the provisions of this subpart may be inspected at such times as the Administrator deems necessary to assure compliance with the standards set forth in § 260.39. Each Borrower shall permit representatives of the FRA to enter upon its property to inspect and examine such facilities at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner. Such representatives shall be permitted to use such testing devices as the Administrator deems necessary to insure that the maintenance standards imposed by this subpart are being followed.
( b ) Each Borrower shall submit annually to the Administrator financial records and other documents detailing the maintenance and inspections performed which demonstrate that the Borrower has complied with the standards in § 260.39.
JAMES THOMAS SMITH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-4497

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 15, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County.

Robert M. Foster, Judge.

James Thomas Smith, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., CONCUR.
#### § 29.211 Is technical assistance available to a Tribe to overcome rejection of a final offer?

The Department must provide technical assistance to overcome the objections stated in the Department's rejection of a final offer.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          43,702                  43,702
<SECURITIES>                                       799                     799
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,299,724               1,299,724
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,686                  17,686
<INVENTORY>                                  1,641,192               1,641,192
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,246,726               3,246,726
<PP&E>                                       5,638,955               5,638,955
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,608,608               3,608,608
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,087,827               6,087,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,891,791               1,891,791
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       264,874                 264,874
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,148,531               1,148,531
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,087,827               6,087,827
<SALES>                                      1,011,110               2,904,888
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,615,610               4,805,013
<CGS>                                          590,896               1,742,956
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,601,593               4,988,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             128,851                 339,857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (113,816)               (513,403)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (113,816)               (513,403)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (113,816)               (513,403)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.04)                  (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.04)                  (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.79

                         [CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED]

[Certain information has been omitted herein pursuant to a request for
confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2.]


[letterhead]


September 29, 1995

Mr. John Cheesmond
Ciba-Geigy Limited
CH-4002 Basel

Re:  Investment, Research Support and Marketing Agreement

Dear John:


This letter relates to the Investment, Research Support and Marketing
Agreement dated as of September 29, 1995 (the "Research Support Agreement").
 Chiron Corporation ("Chiron") and Ciba-Geigy Limited ("Ciba") hereby confirm
that the obligation of Ciba to purchase Newco Stock under Article 2 of the
Research Support Agreement shall be limited to the initial purchase on
September 29, 1995, of  12,000 shares, at a purchase price of U.S.
$12,000,000, until such time as

     (i)  product rights to [CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED] (or other
     products), all as acceptable to Ciba, are added to Newco pursuant to
     Section 1.04 of the Research Support Agreement, on terms which are mutually
     approved by Chiron and Ciba; and

     (ii) Ciba has completed its internal review and approval of the Research
     Support Agreement, and the parties have made such adjustments to the
     Research Support Agreement as are required as a result of such internal
     review, on terms which are mutually agreed upon.

Chiron and Ciba expect to complete these steps within the next thirty (30) days.

Sincerely,

Chiron Corporation


By   /s/ Dennis Winger
  ---------------------

Title   President
      -----------------


Agreed:   Ciba-Geigy Limited

      By  /s/ R.A. Meyer                             /s/ Herbert Gut
         ----------------------                      -------------------

      Title  Member of the Executive Committee/CFO   Senior Division Counsel
             -------------------------------------   -----------------------
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0549.html[7/20/2015 8:29:13 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-y5c0

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0549

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Leonard Sarman

General Comment

"Im smart enough to plan for my own retirement!" so leave my retirement account alone.
-----Original Message----- 

From: dolphingirl311@yahoo.com [mailto:dolphingirl311@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 4:39 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 30, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jessica Larkin 

10613 Viani Way 

Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
#### § 33.56 Changes or cancellations of an allocation order.

An allocation order may be changed or canceled by an official action of the Department of Transportation.
§ 29.202 How does a Tribe submit a final offer? ( a ) A Tribe must submit a written final offer to the Self-Governance Official to *ttsgp@dot.gov* or send the final offer using any other method that provides receipt to: Self-Governance Official, U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Governmental Affairs (I-10), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
( b ) The final offer should be a separate document from the compact, funding agreement, or amendment and clearly identified as a “Final Offer—Response due within 45 days of receipt.”
§ 236.929 Training specific to roadway workers. ( a ) *How is training for roadway workers to be coordinated with part 214?* Training required under this subpart for a roadway worker must be integrated into the program of instruction required under part 214, subpart C of this chapter (“Roadway Worker Protection”), consistent with task analysis requirements of § 236.923. This training must provide instruction for roadway workers who provide protection for themselves or roadway work groups.
( b ) *What subject areas must roadway worker training include?* ( 1 ) Instruction for roadway workers must ensure an understanding of the role of processor-based signal and train control equipment in establishing protection for roadway workers and their equipment.
( 2 ) Instruction for roadway workers must ensure recognition of processor-based signal and train control equipment on the wayside and an understanding of how to avoid interference with its proper functioning.
( 3 ) Instructions concerning the recognition of system failures and the provision of alternative methods of on-track safety in case the train control system fails, including periodic practical exercises or simulations and operational testing under part 217 of this chapter to ensure the continued capability of roadway workers to be free from the danger of being struck by a moving train or other on-track equipment.
§ 29.919 When must the Self-Governance Official issue a written decision on the claim? ( a ) If the claim is for less than $100,000, the Tribe may request that the Self-Governance Official issue a decision within 60 days of the date of receipt of the claim. If the Tribe does not request that the Self-Governance Official issue a decision within 60 days of the date of receipt of the claim, the Self-Governance Official must issue a decision within a reasonable time, which will depend on the size and complexity of the claim and the adequacy of the information provided in support of the claim. The Tribe must request a decision by the Self-Governance Official before seeking an appeal in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) If the claim is for more than $100,000, the Self-Governance Official must issue a decision within 60 days of the date of receipt of the claim or notify the Tribe of the time within which the Self-Governance Official will issue a decision. Such time frame must be reasonable, which will depend on the size and complexity of the claim and the adequacy of the information provided in support of the claim.
( c ) If the Self-Governance Official does not issue a decision within these time frames, a Tribe may treat the delay as a denial of its claim and appeal the decision in accordance with § 29.921.
REVISED




	
EXHIBIT 10.1

	 
	
REVISED

	 
	
EXHIBIT A

	 
	
to

	 
	
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

	 
	
Dated as of March 1, 2003 between

	 
	
TERRY J. LUNDGREN

	 
	
AND

	 
	
FEDERATED CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 
	
Name:
	
Terry J. Lundgren

	 	 
	
End of Term:
	
February 28, 2007

	 	 
	
Revised Annual Base Compensation:
	

$1,400,000

	 	 
	
Effective Date of Revision:
	

April 1, 2006

	 	 
	
Annual Bonus:
	
The annual bonus payable (if any) under the terms of the 1992 Incentive Bonus Plan (as such may be amended from time to time) of Federated Department Stores, Inc. ("Federated") will be based on performance goals established for the senior executives of the Employer on an annual basis by the Board of Directors of Federated or a Committee thereof, with the amount of bonus equal to a sliding percent of Employee's annual base compensation in effect as of the last day of the performance period based on performance against the targeted annual goals.

	 	 
	 	
Such sliding percent, and the targeted annual goals are set out in Schedule 1 hereto.  





	
TERRY J. LUNDGREN
	
FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST to 

FEDERATED CORPORATE SERVICES, INC. 




  

SCHEDULE 1 TO EXHIBIT A TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT DATED AS OF MARCH 1, 2003 

BETWEEN TERRY J. LUNDGREN AND FEDERATED CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.

 

	
Component
	
Threshold
	
Point at which incremental rate changes


	
Target
	
Over Target 

	
Corporate EBIT $
	
85% of plan



18% of salary
	
95% of plan



54% of salary
	
100% of plan



90% of salary
	
Over 100% of plan



9% of salary for each 1% of EBIT over plan 

plus 90% of salary



	
Corporate Sales $
	
0
	
0
	
100% of plan



30% of salary
	
101% of plan



60% of salary



	
Corporate Cash Flow
	
$50 million below plan



12% of salary


	
$25 million below plan



 

18% of salary
	
100% of plan



 

30% of salary
	
$150 million above plan 



 

60% of salary



	
Total
	
30% of salary
	
72% of salary
	
150% of salary
	
300% of salary



300% bonus calculated based on:




	Achieving 110% of EBIT $ plan and earning a bonus of 180% of salary for this component.


	Achieving the maximum bonus of 60% for sales and cash flow components.



Note:  Achieving more than 110% of EBIT $ plan will result in a bonus payment in excess of 180% of salary for that component.  Total bonus payment may not exceed $7 million.