alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 371.115 Must I maintain agreements with motor carriers before providing written estimates on behalf of these carriers? ( a ) In order to provide estimates of charges for the transportation of household goods, you must do so in accordance with the written agreement required by § 375.409 of this subchapter. Your written agreement with the motor carrier(s) must include the following items: ( 1 ) Your broker name as shown on your FMCSA registration, your physical address, and your U.S. DOT registration number and MC license number;
( 2 ) The authorized motor carrier's name as shown on its FMCSA registration, its physical address, and its U.S. DOT registration number and MC license number;
( 3 ) A concise, easy to understand statement that your written estimate to the individual shipper: ( i ) Will be exclusively on behalf of the authorized household goods motor carrier;
( ii ) Will be based on the authorized household goods motor carrier's published tariff; and
( iii ) Will serve as the authorized household goods motor carrier's estimate for purposes of complying with the requirements of part 375 of this chapter, including the requirement that the authorized household goods motor carrier relinquishes possession of the shipment upon payment of no more than 110 percent of a non-binding estimate at the time of delivery;
( 4 ) Your owner's, corporate officer's, or corporate director's signature lawfully representing your household goods broker operation and the date;
( 5 ) The signature of the authorized household goods motor carrier's owner, corporate officer, or corporate director lawfully representing the household goods motor carrier's operation and the date; and
( b ) The signed written agreement required by this section is public information and you must produce it for review upon reasonable request by a member of the public.
( c ) You must keep copies of the agreements required by this section for as long as you provide estimates on behalf of the authorized household goods motor carrier and for three years thereafter.
#### § 366.5T Blanket designations.

Where an association or corporation has filed with the FMCSA a list of process agents for each State, motor carriers may make the required designations by using the following statement:

Those persons named in the list of process agents on file with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration by ________ (Name of association or corporation) and any subsequently filed revisions thereof, for the States in which this carrier is or may be authorized to operate, including States traversed during such operations, except those States for which individual designations are named.

[82 FR 5303, Jan. 17, 2017]
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 140

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States

Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to ensure the continuation of its 6-day mail delivery service.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 10, 2001

Mr. GRAVES submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the United States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to ensure the continuation of its 6-

day mail delivery service.

Whereas the United States Postal Service has announced

that, in order to offset a projected budget shortfall, it

may need to reduce the frequency of its mail delivery

service from 6 days to 5 days a week (by ending Saturday delivery of mail);

Whereas 6-day mail delivery is an essential service that the

American people have relied on since 1912, particularly

working families that depend on the Postal Service for

the timely delivery of their paychecks;
2

•HRES 140 IH

Whereas Social Security is the primary or sole source of income for many senior citizens, and any delay in the delivery of their Social Security checks would make it difficult

for them to purchase even essential items such as food

and medicine; and

Whereas ending Saturday mail deliveries would inevitably

cause not only delays in the delivery of mail, but higher

postal costs, due to the many hours of additional overtime that the Postal Service would require in order to

handle the resulting backup of mail: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the United States Postal Service should

3 take all appropriate measures to ensure the continuation

4 of its 6-day mail delivery service.

Æ
#### § 236.401 Automatic block signal system and interlocking standards applicable to traffic control systems.

The standards prescribed in §§ 236.201, to 236.203, inclusive, §§ 236.205, 236.206, 236.303, 236.307 and 236.309 to 236.311, inclusive, shall apply to traffic control systems.

[49 FR 3385, Jan. 26, 1984]
#### § 256.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to establish procedures for implementing subsection 4(i) of the Department of Transportation Act as amended (49 U.S.C. 1653(i)) with respect to all financial assistance provided under that subsection.

[40 FR 29080, July 10, 1975]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1443.html[7/23/2015 11:09:54 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-zszt

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1443

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Daniel Sullivan

General Comment

I can plan for my own retirement, thank you very much.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1173.html[7/22/2015 3:12:13 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-a5el

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1173

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Steph Anonymous

General Comment

I want to choose my own retirement. I do not want any more government control in my affairs.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0567.html[7/20/2015 8:59:23 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-464m

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0567

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: James Slagowski

Address:

2212 Alabama Street

Clovis, NM, 88101

Email: jimslag@yahoo.com

Phone: 5757494466

General Comment

Dear Sirs/Madams, I resent the attitude that the American public is not able to manage their won retirements. We

 have managed this far without your help, in fact it was in spite of your hindrance. I did not earn enough during

 my military career to save anything but I stuck it our for my military retirement. Now I have worked at my job

 for just over 10 years and I already have more than double the average balance in my 401K. The market has

 been up and down in the last 10 years due to government interference in the mortgage market but not enough

 regulations on the banks that repackaged them as AAA rated securities. Please leave us alone and let us make

 our own retirement plans without you trying to confiscate what I have scrimped and saved during the last 10

 years. Keep your noses out of my business and my retirement funds and don't worry, you will get your tax

 money when I withdraw from my 401K and IRA's.
§ 240.13 Information collection requirements. ( a ) The information collection requirements of this part were reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*) and are assigned OMB control number 2130-0533.
( b ) The information collection requirements are found in the following sections: §§ 240.101, 240.103, 240.105, 240.107, 240.109, 240.111, 240.113, 240.115, 240.117, 240.119, 240.121, 240.123, 240.125, 240.127, 240.129, 240.201, 240.205, 240.207, 240.209, 240.211, 240.213, 240.215, 240.219, 240.221, 240.223, 240.227, 240.229, 240.301, 240.303, 240.305, 240.307, 240.309, 240.401, 240.403, 240.405, 240.407, 240.411.
[56 FR 28254, June 19, 1991, as amended at 58 FR 19003, Apr. 9, 1993]
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. (Duke Energy Ohio) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James E. Rogers, Chief Executive
Officer of Duke Energy Ohio, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy Ohio.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    JAMES E.
ROGERS                                
|James E. Rogers Chief Executive
Officer March 30, 2007
Exhibit 21.6





                          PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT





                                                                    STATE OF
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                         BUSINESS               ORGANIZATION
------------------                         --------               ------------


NINEVEH WATER COMPANY                WATER SERVICE                PENNSYLVANIA

THE WAVERLY ELECTRIC LIGHT           ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION        PENNSYLVANIA
 AND POWER COMPANY

PENELEC PREFERRED CAPITAL, INC.      SPECIAL-PURPOSE FINANCE      DELAWARE
  PENELEC CAPITAL, L.P.              SPECIAL-PURPOSE FINANCE      DELAWARE

PENELEC PREFERRED CAPITAL II, INC.   SPECIAL-PURPOSE FINANCE      DELAWARE
  PENELEC CAPITAL II, L.P.           SPECIAL-PURPOSE FINANCE      DELAWARE
  PENELEC CAPITAL TRUST              SPECIAL-PURPOSE FINANCE      DELAWARE



Note:  Penelec, along with its affiliates JCP&L and Met-Ed, collectively own all
       of the  common  stock  of  Saxton  Nuclear  Experimental  Corporation,  a
       Pennsylvania  nonprofit  corporation  organized for nuclear  experimental
       purposes  which  is now  inactive.  The  carrying  value  of the  owners'
       investment has been written down to a nominal value.
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.401 General requirements. ( a ) No operator may operate or maintain its pipeline systems at a level of safety lower than that required by this subpart and the procedures it is required to establish under § 195.402(a) of this subpart.
( b ) An operator must make repairs on its pipeline system according to the following requirements: ( 1 ) *Non Integrity management repairs.* Whenever an operator discovers any condition that could adversely affect the safe operation of its pipeline system, it must correct the condition within a reasonable time. However, if the condition is of such a nature that it presents an immediate hazard to persons or property, the operator may not operate the affected part of the system until it has corrected the unsafe condition.
( 2 ) *Integrity management repairs.* When an operator discovers a condition on a pipeline covered under § 195.452, the operator must correct the condition as prescribed in § 195.452(h).
( 3 ) *Prioritizing repairs.* An operator must consider the risk to people, property, and the environment in prioritizing the correction of any conditions referenced in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section.
( c ) Except as provided in § 195.5, no operator may operate any part of any of the following pipelines unless it was designed and constructed as required by this part: ( 1 ) An interstate pipeline, other than a low-stress pipeline, on which construction was begun after March 31, 1970, that transports hazardous liquid.
( 2 ) An interstate offshore gathering line, other than a low-stress pipeline, on which construction was begun after July 31, 1977, that transports hazardous liquid.
( 3 ) An intrastate pipeline, other than a low-stress pipeline, on which construction was begun after October 20, 1985, that transports hazardous liquid.
( 4 ) A pipeline on which construction was begun after July 11, 1991, that transports carbon dioxide.
( 5 ) A low-stress pipeline on which construction was begun after August 10, 1994.
[Amdt. 195-22, 46 FR 38360, July 27, 1981, as amended by Amdt. 195-33, 50 FR 15899, Apr. 23, 1985; Amdt. 195-33A, 50 FR 39008, Sept. 26, 1985; Amdt. 195-36, 51 FR 15008, Apr. 22, 1986; Amdt. 195-45, 56 FR 26926, June 12, 1991; Amdt. 195-53, 59 FR 35471, July 12, 1994; Amdt. 195-94, 75 FR 48607, Aug. 11, 2010; Amdt. 195-102, 84 FR 52295, Oct. 1, 2019]
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*The Mayor, etc., of the City of New York v. John Kelly. Allen Campbell and Daniel Lord, Jr.

Writ dismissed and the decision of the assessment commissioners, in the case of Julia Douglas, affirmed. Opinion by

Brady, J.;

Davis, P. J., concurred.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5125-N-36]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

September 7, 2007.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the  hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these                               ( print page 51461)                            telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration*, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: August 30, 2007.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 07-4321 Filed 9-6-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-M
#### § 29.308 May the funding agreement include additional terms from title I of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act?

At a Tribe's request, the Department and the Tribe may incorporate into a compact or funding agreement any other provision of title I of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, unless the Department determines there is a conflict between the provision and 23 U.S.C. 207. The Department will make the determination consistent with 23 U.S.C. 207(j).
Filed Electronically

Office of Health Plan Standards and Compliance Assistance

Employee Benefits Security Administration

Room N-5653U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue NWWashington, DC 20210

Attention: MHPAEA Comments

Dear Sir or Madam:

The Texas Department ofInsurance (Department) appreciates the opportunity to submit

comments regarding specific points of clarification it believes would be helpful for the

Departments of Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services to include in any

rulemaking to implement the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity andAddiction Equity Act of 2008 (M1{PAEA).

The Department believes the following are among points about which clarification would

be helpful both to departments ofinsurance and to the employer health benefit plans and

plan issuers over which the departments have regulatory purview.First, the Department suggests clarifying whether a state mandate for minimum levels of a

particular type of coverage automatically triggers a requirement for full parity under the

federal act, even ifthe intent ofthe state law and the maimer in which it is set out is to

require a specific, discrete coverage type and not to require or mandate provision ofmentalhealth or substance use benefit coverage equivalent to other coverage.

For example, would state imposition of a defined minimum requirement for benefit

coverage for a specific serious mental illness bring the health benefit plan issuer and the

plan under the federal requirements of MHPAEA even though the issuer and plan includethe coverage simply to be compliant with the requirements ofstate law and not because

either the plan or issuer, independent ofthe state requirement for the coverage, is offering

or providing mental health or substance use benefit coverage.
pp

Third, the Department suggests clarification as to whether a state law which requires or

mandates minimum levels of a specific or particular type of coverage but is neither a

general requirement to provide mental health benefits nor a mandate that is consistent in

every detail with MHPAEA would be treated as a state law that “prevents the application”

of MHPAEA and therefore possibly subject to federal preemption provisions.

Fourth, the Department suggests clarification as to whether specific, discrete requirements

applicable to health plan benefits for coverage generally would be permitted for mental

healthlsubstance use disorder benefits for coverage under MHPAEA. For example, if a

health plan with respect to inpatient hospital visits for covered conditions requires pre

authorization, would such requirements also be permitted for inpatient hospital visits for

mental healthlsubstance use disorder benefits.

Thank you again for the opportunity to comment on implementation of MHPAEA. Please

let us know if additional information would be helpful.

Sincerely,

Katrina Daniel

Associate CommissionerLife, Health & Licensing Program

KD:NH:lj
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyo-udp3

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2213

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I want you Communist Pigs in Washington DC to stay out of my life . Take care of our 

Constitution and obey it in its entirety . Let's us in America be FREE FROM GOVERNMENT ... 

Don't tread on me !!!
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1127.html[7/22/2015 12:11:50 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-dk7b

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1127

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I don't need any government telling how my retired money should be spent.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0794.html[7/21/2015 1:05:19 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-mvtk

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0794

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Meaghan Coval

Address:

P.O. Box 644

250 Foothill DR

Baker City, OR, 97814

Email: amethystjadescion@gmail.com

Phone: 5415235736

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan my own retirement, thank you. I don't need a liberal president who doesn't even do his

 job controlling me or taking my rights away!
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 139

_____________________________
J EROME R OBERSON ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal

— Original Jurisdiction

.

April 17, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. The amended petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

L EWIS , W ETHERELL , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jerome Roberson, pro se
, Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Resp ondent

.