alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 268.19 Evaluation of applications for preconstruction planning assistance.

The FRA will evaluate the applications for their completeness and responsiveness to the requirements listed in § 268.15. In addition, applicants are advised that the Maglev Deployment Program contains a number of project eligibility standards (minimum threshold standards) and project evaluation criteria that will guide the FRA's review of the project descriptions produced under the Planning Grants. The FRA's implementation of these standards and criteria appears in § 268.11 and § 268.17, respectively. Although subject to revision, the information in § 268.11 and § 268.17 should assist the States in completing their applications in the competition for planning grants, since the project descriptions will need to respond to the standards and criteria. In evaluating the applications for planning grants, FRA will consider how consistent the applicant's project is to the standards and criteria, and the application's likelihood of leading to a project that meets all the standards and criteria.
Exhibit 10.4

                 CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE AGREEMENT

This Convertible Debenture Agreement is dated the 12h day of August, 2004
between Holmes Herbs, Inc. (the "Company") Peter G. Matthews(the "Lender").

Whereas the Company wishes to borrow money from the Lender upon the terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement;

This Agreement Witnesses that in consideration of the premises and mutual
covenants contained in this Agreement and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
the parties, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:

1.    Principal Amount:  The Lender agrees to advance to the Company the
      principal sum of US$5,000 ("Principal").  All amounts advanced by the
      Lender to the Company prior to this Convertible Debenture Agreement will
      be considered part of the Principal amount and fall within the terms
      hereof.

2.    Term:  The term of the loan is two years following the date of issuance
      of this Convertible Debenture Agreement set forth above.

3.    Promise to Pay:  For value received, the Company hereby promises to pay
      to the Lender the Principal, and to pay interest thereon from the date
      of issuance of this Convertible Debenture Agreement and advancement of
      all of a portion of the Principal, at the rate of ten percent (10%) per
      annum calculated and compounded annually, on or before the end of the
      term hereof.

4.    Early Payment:  The Company may prepay the principal and interest
      accrued to the date of payment, in whole or in part, without penalty.

5.    Conversion Right:  If all of any portion of the Principal and interest
      remains unpaid at the end of the term, the Lender shall have the right
      to convert the Principal and interest earned thereon to common stock in
      the Company at a value of US$0.01 per share, by providing the Company
      with written notice of conversion and an executed Subscription
      Agreement.  Upon receipt of notice and the Subscription Agreement, the
      Company shall forthwith issue to the Lender sufficient common shares to
      pay the amount that is subject to conversion.

6.    Waiver of Notice:  Notice of demand and presentment for payment are
      hereby waived.

7.    Counterparts:  This Convertible Debenture Agreement may be executed in
      counterparts and delivered by facsimile.

Executed at Las Vegas, Nevada.

Holmes Herbs, Inc.


Per: /s/ John F. Metcalfe
      Authorized Signatory


Peter G. Matthews

Per:/s/ Peter G. Matthews
      Peter G. Matthews
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Nursing Research Special Emphasis Panel, Mentored Research Scientist Development Award.                    

*Date:*                         March 5, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         7:30 a.m. to 8 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Crowne Plaza Hotel, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20910.                    

*Contact Person:*                         John E. Richters, PhD, Chief, Office of Review, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd. Room 715, Bethesda, MD 20817, (301) 594-5971,                         *jrichters@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 21, 2007.

David Clary,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-359  Filed 1-29-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Employee Benefits Security Administration

Office of Regulations and Interpretations

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, NW

Room N-5655

Washington, DC 20210

Re: Definition of the Term “Fiduciary;” Conflict of Interest Rule –

Retirement Investment Advice

RIN 1210-AB32

Re: Proposed Best Interest Contract Exemption

ZRIN 1210-ZA25 

Re: Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited 

Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving 

Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Consultants, Insurance 

Companies and Investment Company Principal Underwriters

ZRIN 1210-ZA25

To Whom it May Concern:

I am the President of the Kansas Farm Bureau, a member of the Board of Directors of 

Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company and am pleased to provide these comments with 

respect to the Department of Labor’s notice of proposed rulemaking concerning the 

Definition of the Term “Fiduciary” of an employee benefit plan (the “Proposed 

Regulation”), the related proposed Best Interest Contract Exemption (the “Proposed BIC 

Exemption”), and the proposed amendment to and proposed partial revocation of 

prohibited transaction exemption 84-24 (the “Proposed PTE 84-24 Exemption 

Amendment”) (collectively, the “Proposal”).

The Kansas Farm Bureau is a grassroots, statewide organization dedicated to helping 

Kansas farm families prosper and improve their quality of life. More than 105,000 

families in 105 Kansas counties are Farm Bureau members, working together to achieve 

farm and rural prosperity. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company, is an Iowa domiciled 

life insurance company that markets life insurance and annuity products in the following 
states: Arizona, Kansas, Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, 

North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Utah, Wisconsin and Wyoming. Farm Bureau 

Life Insurance Company provides insurance and financial services to Farm Bureau 

members and others in rural areas of the West and Midwest that other insurers have 

long since abandoned. 

Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company is a member of both the American Council of Life 

Insurers ("ACLI") and the Investment Retirement Institute ("IRI"). Our management has 

been working closely with both organizations with respect to comment letters those 

organizations are preparing and will be submitting in response to the above-referenced 

proposal. We strongly support and endorse the positions in the comment letters of both 

the ACLI and the IRI and ask that the Department of Labor address the issues raised in 

the letters of those two associations.

Sincerely,

Richard Felts

President
exv10w3



 




Exhibit 10.3


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statements filed on Form F-3
(File Nos. 333-84226, 333-128361, 333-129962 and 333-130040) and in any related Prospectus and (ii)
the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos: 333-11368, 333-11414, 333-13038, 333-13664,
333-13668, 333-14254, 333-14252, 333-81564, 333-92220, 333-108833 and 333-125075) of our report
dated March 20, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of ING Belgium SA/NV,
not included in the ING Groep N.V. Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2005.



Brussels, Belgium




March 24, 2006




Ernst & Young Reviseurs d’Enterprises S.C.C.
Editorial Note on Part 381
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 381 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 381.505 What are the minimum elements required for a pilot program? ( a ) *Safety measures.* Before granting exemptions for a pilot program, the FMCSA will ensure that the safety measures in a pilot program are designed to achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety that would be achieved by complying with the regulations.
( b ) *Pilot program plan.* Before initiating a pilot program, the FMCSA will ensure that there is a pilot program plan which includes the following elements: ( 1 ) A scheduled duration of three years or less;
( 2 ) A specific data collection and safety analysis plan that identifies a method of comparing the safety performance for motor carriers, CMVs, and drivers operating under the terms and conditions of the pilot program, with the safety performance of motor carriers, CMVs, and drivers that comply with the regulation;
( 3 ) A reasonable number of participants necessary to yield statistically valid findings;
( 4 ) A monitoring plan to ensure that participants comply with the terms and conditions of participation in the pilot program;
( 5 ) Adequate safeguards to protect the health and safety of study participants and the general public; and
( 6 ) A plan to inform the States and the public about the pilot program and to identify approved participants to enforcement personnel and the general public.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           OMEGA FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      This certification is intended to accompany Omega Financial Corporation's
(the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31,
2004 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. I, David B. Lee, hereby certify in my capacity as the Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


Date: May 5, 2004                            /s/ David B. Lee
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             David B. Lee
                                             Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 6239

RADHWAN AL

- HAMOOD , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. NORTH CAROLINA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:20

- hc

- 02220

- BO )

Submitted : September 30, 2022 Decided: November 3, 2022

Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Radhwan Al

- Hamood, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6239 Doc: 5 Filed: 11/03/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Radhwan Al

- Hamood seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealabili ty will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive proced ural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the recor d and conclude that Al

- Hamood has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6239 Doc: 5 Filed: 11/03/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **CLARCOR    Inc.** **Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as    Adopted Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, Norman E. Johnson, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief    Executive Officer of CLARCOR Inc., hereby certify that the    accompanying Report of CLARCOR Inc. on    Form 10-K    Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934 and that information contained in the    Form 10-K    Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the    financial condition and results of operations of CLARCOR Inc.      By /s/  Norman    E. Johnson
#### The People of the State of New York *v.*James Lane.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered. Opinions by

Brady and Daniels, JJ.;

Davis, P. J., dissenting.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Datakey, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, David A. Feste, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: August 9, 2004Signature:

    /s/ David A. FesteDavid A. FesteChief Financial Officer
#### § 231.22 Operation of track motor cars.

On and after August 1, 1963, it shall be unlawful for any railroad subject to the requirements of the Safety Appliance Acts to operate or permit to be operated on its line track motor cars to pull or haul trailers, push trucks, hand cars, or similar cars or equipment.

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 28 FR 7839, Aug. 1, 1963, the effective date of § 231.22 was stayed until further notice.
§ 25.415 Access to course offerings. ( a ) A recipient shall not provide any course or otherwise carry out any of its education program or activity separately on the basis of sex, or require or refuse participation therein by any of its students on such basis, including health, physical education, industrial, business, vocational, technical, home economics, music, and adult education courses.
( b ) ( 1 ) With respect to classes and activities in physical education at the elementary school level, the recipient shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than one year from September 29, 2000. With respect to physical education classes and activities at the secondary and post-secondary levels, the recipient shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than three years from September 29, 2000.
( 2 ) This section does not prohibit grouping of students in physical education classes and activities by ability as assessed by objective standards of individual performance developed and applied without regard to sex.
( 3 ) This section does not prohibit separation of students by sex within physical education classes or activities during participation in wrestling, boxing, rugby, ice hockey, football, basketball, and other sports the purpose or major activity of which involves bodily contact.
( 4 ) Where use of a single standard of measuring skill or progress in a physical education class has an adverse effect on members of one sex, the recipient shall use appropriate standards that do not have such effect.
( 5 ) Portions of classes in elementary and secondary schools, or portions of education programs or activities, that deal exclusively with human sexuality may be conducted in separate sessions for boys and girls.
( 6 ) Recipients may make requirements based on vocal range or quality that may result in a chorus or choruses of one or predominantly one sex.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Robert V. Condon, Chief Financial Officer of Merrimac
Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending April
     2, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
     hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

/s/ Robert V. Condon
--------------------
Robert V. Condon
Chief Financial Officer
May 17, 2005
```
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.405T How does a motor carrier apply for a safety permit? ( a ) *Application form(s).* ( 1 ) To apply for a new safety permit or renewal of the safety permit, a motor carrier must complete and submit Form MCS-150B, Combined Motor Carrier Identification Report and HM Permit Application.
( 2 ) The Form MCS-150B will also satisfy the requirements for obtaining and renewing a USDOT Number; there is no need to complete Form MCS-150, Motor Carrier Identification Report.
( b ) *Where to get forms and instructions.* The forms listed in paragraph (a) of this section, and instructions for completing the forms, may be obtained on the internet at *http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov ,* or by contacting FMCSA at Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Office of Registration and Safety Information (MC-RS), 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001 or by telephone at 1-800-832-5660.
( c ) *Registration with the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA).* The motor carrier must be registered with PHMSA in accordance with part 107, subpart G, of this title.
( d ) *Updating information on Form MCS-150B.* A motor carrier holding a safety permit must report to FMCSA any change in the information on its Form MCS-150B within 30 days of the change. The motor carrier must use Form MCS-150B to report the new information (contact information in paragraph (b) of this section).
[82 FR 5304, Jan. 17, 2017, as amended at 84 FR 51433, Sept. 30, 2019]
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.553 General requirements. ( a ) *Pressure increases.* Whenever the requirements of this subpart require that an increase in operating pressure be made in increments, the pressure must be increased gradually, at a rate that can be controlled, and in accordance with the following: ( 1 ) At the end of each incremental increase, the pressure must be held constant while the entire segment of pipeline that is affected is checked for leaks.
( 2 ) Each leak detected must be repaired before a further pressure increase is made, except that a leak determined not to be potentially hazardous need not be repaired, if it is monitored during the pressure increase and it does not become potentially hazardous.
( b ) *Records.* Each operator who uprates a segment of pipeline shall retain for the life of the segment a record of each investigation required by this subpart, of all work performed, and of each pressure test conducted, in connection with the uprating.
( c ) *Written plan.* Each operator who uprates a segment of pipeline shall establish a written procedure that will ensure that each applicable requirement of this subpart is complied with.
( d ) *Limitation on increase in maximum allowable operating pressure.* Except as provided in § 192.555(c), a new maximum allowable operating pressure established under this subpart may not exceed the maximum that would be allowed under §§ 192.619 and 192.621 for a new segment of pipeline constructed of the same materials in the same location. However, when uprating a steel pipeline, if any variable necessary to determine the design pressure under the design formula (§ 192.105) is unknown, the MAOP may be increased as provided in § 192.619(a)(1).
[35 FR 13257, Aug. 10, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28785, June 6, 1996; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53901, Sept. 15, 2003]