alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Created by Section 906

of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

The undersigned officer of FileNet Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

 (i)          the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

 (ii)         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated:  November 7, 2005
| */s/ Lee D. Roberts*** |
|------------------------|

Lee D. Roberts 

Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer
-----Original Message-----

From: gmail [mailto:kathy.rubin1@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2015 6:05 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Cc: Kathy Rubin

Subject: RIN 1210 – AB32 in the subject line.

With all that has incurred over the past number of years, this should be instated to protect the little guys 

like myself.

Everyone likes to earn money for their efforts but, it should be earn for a reasonable fee and with 

honesty and integrity. Licensed professionals should also be overseen and the SEC can not do 

everything. Please pass this not only to protect the little guys but to help wall street redeem itself.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 31, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-1495 Lower Tribunal No. 14-30219

________________ 

### Jorge Gonzalez-Barrera, et al. ,

Appellants,
vs. 

### Majorca Towers Condominium, Inc. ,

Appellee.
An appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos Lopez, Judge. W. Sam Holland, for appellants. Becker & Poliakoff, P.A., and Lilliana M. Farinas-Sabogal, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and EMAS, and MILLER, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Lazcar Int’l, Inc. v. Caraballo, 957 So. 2d 1191, 1193 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Allstate Floridian Ins. Co. v. Ronco Inventions, LLC, 890 So. 2d 300, 304 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); see also Gonzalez-Barrera v. Majorca Towers Condo., Inc., 197 So. 3d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Gonzalez-Barrera v. Majorca Towers Condo., Inc., 210 So. 3d 673 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Gonzalez-Barrera v. Majorca Towers Condo., Inc., 272 So. 3d 424 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019).
Docket: CMS-2009-0040 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: CMS-2009-0040-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: CMS-2009-0040-0006 

MN-JoAnne 

Submitter Information 

Name: JoAnne 

Address: 

Anoka, MN, 55303 

General Comment 

As an individual, or maybe the correct word is consumer, who has needed both 

Mental Health care and Substance Abuse help, I applaude this Equity Act. 

It's about time that these two illnesses/diseases are treated the same as other 

illnesses! Hopefully, this will help bring us closer to erasing the "stigma" that goes 

with both of these health issues. 

Speaking from personal experience, I have experienced the stigma first-hand. 

Unfortunately, I have felt this from Health Professionals, as well as the general 

public. Another needed program is to educate the public and professionals about 

this. 

Just wanted to put my two cent's in. Thank you, JoAnne

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 12, 2009 

Received: May 07, 2009 

Status: Posted 

Posted: May 11, 2009 

Category: Individual 

Tracking No. 8097c419 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web
Exhibit 10



Exhibit 10.1

FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.

Description of Stock Credit Plan for 2006-2007 Performance Period

On March 24, 2006, the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board of Directors of Federated Department Stores, Inc. (the "Company") authorized a stock credit plan for its senior executives, including its named executive officers, for the performance period covering fiscal years 2006 and 2007. The purpose of the stock credit plan is to align senior management's compensation with the interests of the Company's stockholders and the Company's performance, including achievement of Federated's Four Priorities for 2006 and 2007: Merchandise Assortments, Price Simplification, The Shopping Experience and Marketing, and achievement of synergies associated with the Company's merger with The May Department Stores Company ("May").

The stock credit plan consists of two types of stock credits: core stock credits and merger stock credits. Core stock credits are 50% performance based and 50% time based. The performance based portion will be based on performance against Federated's Four Priorities. Merger stock credits are 100% performance based and will be based on performance against financial measurements of May merger synergies. Stock credits earned will be subject to two-year and three-year holding periods and their ultimate value to the participants will be based on Federated' stock price performance. The value of one-half of the stock credits earned will be paid in cash in Spring 2010 and the value of the other half will be paid in cash in Spring 2011. In each case, the value will be determined on the basis of the average closing price of Federated common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange for the 20 business days preceding the payment date.

The performance portion of the stock credits for Ronald W. Tysoe, who has previously announced his intended retirement, will be based on goals specific to his responsibilities for May merger-related asset and real estate transactions. Mr. Tysoe's stock credits are 75% performance based and 25% time based. Mr. Tysoe's performance period will be 2006-2007, with payout of his time based and any earned performance-based stock credits in 2008.
1210-AB32-2-1062.html[7/23/2015 3:42:39 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-gggk

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1554

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Angela Johnson

General Comment

My husband and I are able to plan for our own retirements; we need less government intervention in all areas of

 our lives, and this is especially true of our finances.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1522.html[7/23/2015 12:32:35 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-w0vs

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1522

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I DO NOT NEED YA'LL TO TELL ME HOW TO USE MY MONEY FROM MY RETIREMENT THANKS

 BUT NO THANKS I DON'T NEED YOUR HELP
§ 219.303 Reasonable suspicion observations. ( a ) With respect to an alcohol test, the required observations must be made by a responsible railroad supervisor (defined by § 219.5) trained in accordance with § 219.11(g). The supervisor who makes the determination that reasonable suspicion exists may not conduct the reasonable suspicion testing on that regulated employee.
( b ) With respect to a drug test, the required observations must be made by two responsible railroad supervisors (defined by § 219.5), at least one of whom must be both on site and trained in accordance with § 219.11(g). If one of the supervisors is off site, the on-site supervisor must communicate with the off-site supervisor, as necessary, to provide him or her the information needed to make the required observation. This communication may be performed via telephone, but not via radio or any other form of electronic communication.
( c ) This subpart does not authorize holding any employee out of service pending receipt of toxicological analysis for reasonable suspicion testing, nor does it restrict a railroad from taking such action based on the employee's underlying conduct, provided it is consistent with the railroad's policy and taken under the railroad's own authority.
( d ) The railroad must maintain written documentation that specifically describes the observed signs and symptoms upon which the determination that reasonable suspicion exists is based. This documentation must be completed promptly by the trained supervisor.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 19

- 11262 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee
,

versus

**Michael Adair Mankin,**

Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05

- CR

- 193

- 1

Before **Higginbotham, Jones, and Costa**  **,** Circuit Judges

.

**Per Curiam** : * Michael Adair Mankin appeals the revocation of his supervised
release and resulting 10

- month term of imprisonment. Mankin’s supervised
release was revoked under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g), which requires the

* Pursu ant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 24, 2020
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-11262 Document: 00515502565 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/24/2020No. 19

- 11262

2 revocation of supervised release and prison time for defendants found to have committed specified drug

- or gun

- related violations.
On appeal, Mankin argues for the first time that § 3583(g) is unconstitutional in light of United States v. Haymond , 139 S. Ct. 2369 (2019), because it does not require a ju ry determination of guilt beyond a reasonable
doubt. R eview of this unpreserved issue is for plain error, which requires him to show (1) an error that has not been affirmatively waived, (2) that is clear or obvious, and (3) that affected his substantial r ights. See Puckett v. United
States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). If he can satisfy those three prongs, this court has the discretion to correct the error if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. See id

. Haymond addressed the constitutionality of § 3583(k), and the plurality opinion specifically disclaimed expressing any view of the constitutionality of § 3583(g). See Haymond , 139 S. Ct. at 2382 n.7. In the absence of precedent from either the Supreme Court or this court extending Haymond to § 3583(g), we conclude that there is no clear or obvious error.

See Puckett , 556 U.S. at 135; United States v. Evans , 587 F.3d 667, 671 (5th Cir. 2009).

T he judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 19-11262 Document: 00515502565 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/24/2020
-----Original Message----- 

From: jmperry@cfl.rr.com [mailto:jmperry@cfl.rr.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:41 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jason Perry 

1820 Apricot Drive 

Titusville, FL 32780
§ 241.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to prevent railroad accidents and incidents, and consequent injuries, deaths, and property damage, that would result from improper dispatching of railroad operations in the United States by individuals located outside of the United States.
( b ) This part prohibits extraterritorial dispatching of railroad operations, conducting railroad operations that are extraterritorially dispatched, and allowing track to be used for such operations, subject to certain stated exceptions. This part does not restrict a railroad from adopting and enforcing additional or more stringent requirements not inconsistent with this part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1979 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,388,952
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,388,952
<PP&E>                                      33,241,002
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,909,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,735,009
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          472,128
<BONDS>                                      7,896,487
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,366,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,735,009
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,192,818
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               930,294
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,316,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             486,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,799,353
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,799,353
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,799,353
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    19.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    19.78
        

</TABLE>
§ 377.201 Scope. ( a ) *General.* These regulations apply to the extension of credit in the transportation of property under Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration regulation by for-hire, non-exempt motor carriers and household goods freight forwarders subject to 49 U.S.C. subtitle IV, part B, except as otherwise provided.
( b ) *Exceptions.* These regulations do not apply to— ( 1 ) Transportation for— ( i ) The United States or any department, bureau, or agency thereof;
( ii ) Any State or political subdivision thereof; or
( iii ) The District of Columbia.
( 2 ) Property transportation incidental to passenger operations.
[81 FR 68346, Oct. 4, 2016]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0971.html[7/21/2015 6:59:01 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-x0jl

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0971

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: John Roush

General Comment

I understand that you folks in the Department of Labor are planning to make it hard for me in retirement by enact

 regulations that would restrict how I use my own money for my retirement. You folks must think believe that I

 am not smart enough to plan for my retirement. This is the epitome of the nanny state mentality. 

It seems the current administration has tried to control what I eat, how much money I make, your health care, and

 NOW my retirement. I have invested in an IRA and understand I will be affected by your new regulations.

I can certainly plan for my own retirement. Ive spent your life working towards my retirement. Some

 government bureaucrat should not get in the way of that. Don't be restricting my retirement. 

Again, Im smart enough to plan for my own retirement and surely don't need your department's help.
§ 350.213 What must a State include for the second and third years of the CVSP? ( a ) *General.* For the second and third years of the CVSP, a Lead State Agency must submit an annual update that complies with the MCSAP application announcement and, at a minimum, must include program goals, certifications, and other information revised since the prior year's submission, and the items listed in paragraphs (b) to (g) of this section.
( b ) *Budget.* For the second and third years of the CVSP, the Lead State Agency must include a budget that supports the applicable fiscal year of the CVSP and describes the expenditures for allocable costs, such as personnel and related costs, equipment purchases, printing, information systems costs, and other eligible costs consistent with § 350.229.
( c ) *Resource allocation.* For the second and third years of the CVSP, the Lead State Agency must explain the rationale for the State's resource allocation decisions.
( d ) *List of MCSAP contacts.* For the second and third years of the CVSP, the Lead State Agency must include a list of MCSAP contacts.
( e ) *Certification.* ( 1 ) For the second and third years of the CVSP, the Lead State Agency must certify that it has: ( i ) Met all the MCSAP conditions in § 350.207; and
( ii ) Completed the annual review required by § 350.303 and determined that State laws, regulations, standards, and orders on CMV safety are compatible (as defined in § 350.105 of this part).
( 2 ) If a State law, regulation, standard, or order on CMV safety is no longer compatible, the certifying official must explain the State's plan to address the discrepancy.
( 3 ) A certification under this paragraph must reflect that the certifying official has authority to make the certification on behalf of the State.
( f ) *New or amended laws.* For the second and third years of the CVSP, the Lead State Agency must submit to FMCSA a copy of any new or amended law, regulation, standard, or order on CMV safety that the State enacted since the prior year's submission.
( g ) *Further submissions.* For the second and third years of the CVSP, the Lead State Agency must submit other information required, as described in the MCSAP application announcement for that fiscal year.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 6/12/15 9:18 AM

Received: June 11, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jd2-vrlq

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: API

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0316

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Anoymous Anoymous

General Comment

One more time a Government agency out of control!!! When is Congress going to put a stop to 

Government Agencies changing laws with out their approval!

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b2cef5&format=xml&show... 6/12/2015
§ 37.37 Other applications. ( a ) A private entity does not become subject to the requirements of this part for public entities, because it receives an operating subsidy from, is regulated by, or is granted a franchise or permit to operate by a public entity.
( b ) Shuttle systems and other transportation services operated by privately-owned hotels, car rental agencies, historical or theme parks, and other public accommodations are subject to the requirements of this part for private entities not primarily engaged in the business of transporting people. Either the requirements for demand responsive or fixed route service may apply, depending upon the characteristics of each individual system of transportation.
( c ) Conveyances used by members of the public primarily for recreational purposes rather than for transportation (e.g., amusement park rides, ski lifts, or historic rail cars or trolleys operated in museum settings) are not subject to the requirements of this part. Such conveyances are subject to Department of Justice regulations implementing title II or title III of the ADA (28 CFR part 35 or 36), as applicable.
( d ) Transportation services provided by an employer solely for its own employees are not subject to the requirements of this part. Such services are subject to the regulations of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission under title I of the ADA (29 CFR part 1630) and, with respect to public entities, the regulations of the Department of Justice under title II of the ADA (28 CFR part 35).
( e ) Transportation systems operated by private clubs or establishments exempted from coverage under title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000-a(e)) or religious organizations or entities controlled by religious organizations are not subject to the requirements of this part.
( f ) If a parent private company is not primarily engaged in the business of transporting people, or is not a place of public accommodation, but a subsidiary company or an operationally distinct segment of the company is primarily engaged in the business of transporting people, the transportation service provided by the subsidiary or segment is subject to the requirements of this part for private entities primarily engaged in the business of transporting people.
( g ) High-speed rail systems operated by public entities are subject to the requirements of this part governing intercity rail systems.
( h ) Private rail systems providing fixed route or specified public transportation service are subject to the requirements of § 37.107 with respect to the acquisition of rail passenger cars. Such systems are subject to the requirements of the regulations of the Department of Justice implementing title III of the ADA (28 CFR part 36) with respect to stations and other facilities.
Editorial Note on Part 386
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 386 appear at 65 FR 7755, Feb. 16, 2000, and 88 FR 80182, Nov. 17, 2023.

§ 386.49 Form of written evidence. All written evidence should be submitted in the following forms: ( a ) A written statement of a person having personal knowledge of the facts alleged, or
( b ) Documentary evidence in the form of exhibits attached to a written statement identifying the exhibit and giving its source.
[70 FR 28484, May 18, 2005]