alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 968 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 968

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow as a deduction in 
    determining adjusted gross income the deduction for expenses in 
  connection with services as a member of a reserve component of the 
                   Armed Forces of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2001

   Mr. Ramstad (for himself, Mr. Tanner, Mr. Houghton, Mr. Lewis of 
   Kentucky, Mr. Buyer, Mr. Taylor of Mississippi, Mr. Watkins, Mr. 
  Simmons, and Mr. Cooksey) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow as a deduction in 
    determining adjusted gross income the deduction for expenses in 
  connection with services as a member of a reserve component of the 
                   Armed Forces of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reservists Tax Relief Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTION OF CERTAIN EXPENSES OF RESERVISTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 62(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to certain trade and business deductions of employees) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(D) Certain expenses of members of reserve 
                components of the armed forces of the united states.--
                The deductions allowed by section 162 which consist of 
                expenses paid or incurred by the taxpayer in connection 
                with the performance of services by such taxpayer as a 
                member of a reserve component of the Armed Forces of 
                the United States.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to amounts paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after December 
31, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2303 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2303

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require as a condition 
 of receiving payments under such title for the costs of administering 
   its medicaid plan that each State include on the enrollment card 
     provided to beneficiaries under the plan a photograph of the 
                  beneficiary, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 1995

  Mrs. Lowey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require as a condition 
 of receiving payments under such title for the costs of administering 
   its medicaid plan that each State include on the enrollment card 
     provided to beneficiaries under the plan a photograph of the 
                  beneficiary, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF PHOTOGRAPHIC IDENTIFICATION ON MEDICAID ENROLLMENT 
              CARDS AS CONDITION OF RECEIPT OF PAYMENTS FOR PLAN 
              ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 1903(i) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396b(i)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (14), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (15), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (15) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(16) with respect to any amount expended during a quarter 
        for the administration of the State plan, unless in the 
        administration of the plan the State includes on the enrollment 
        card provided to each enrolled individual a photograph of the 
        individual and information on the individual's gender, height, 
        and eye color, except to the extent that the State demonstrates 
        that the inclusion of a photograph or such information on a 
        card is not cost-effective with respect to a class of 
        individuals enrolled in the State plan because minimal fraud 
        exists in connection with the State plan which results from the 
        incorrect identification of such individuals.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to quarters beginning on or after the expiration of the 2-year 
period which begins on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2368

To establish audit authority in the United States General Accounting Office

over the Niagara Falls Bridge Commission.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 20, 1995

Mr. LAFALCE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To establish audit authority in the United States General

Accounting Office over the Niagara Falls Bridge Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 6 of the joint resolution entitled ‘‘Joint reso4 lution creating the Niagara Falls Bridge Commission and

5 authorizing said Commission and its successors to con6 struct, maintain, and operate a bridge across the Niagara

7 River at or near the city of Niagara Falls, New York’’,

8 approved June 16, 1938, as amended, is further amended

9 by adding the following:
2

HR 2368 IH

1 ‘‘The Commission may be audited by the United

2 States General Accounting Office (GAO), at its discretion,

3 under such conditions and procedures as may be pre4 scribed by the GAO, and for this purpose the GAO shall

5 have such access to all Commission records as is necessary

6 to facilitate the audit.’’.

Æ
#### John S. Jones, Respondent, *v.*George J. Gould et al., Appellants.

*Jonas*v. Gould, 143 App. Div. 244, reversed.

(Argued April 25, 1911;

decided May 9, 1911.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 16, 1911, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a re-taxation of costs.

The following questions were certified: “1. Does the. remittitur of the Court of Appeals, reversing the judgment entered pursuant to • an order of the Special Term, as modified and affirmed by the Appellate Division which dismissed the complaint, and awarding costs to the plaintiff appellant in all courts, embrace costs awarded to the parties defendant to abide the event by another and prior and unreversed judgment of the Appellate Division, from which no appeal has been taken to the Court of Appeals? 2. Does such an award of costs authorize the taxing clerk to tax an additional allowance, awarded to the plaintiff as the prevailing party, by an order of the Trial Term, which allowance was included in and made a part of the judgment of the Trial Term in favor of the plaintiff, which judgment was subsequently reversed by the Appellate Division by a judgment of reversal, from which no appeal has been taken to the Court of Appeals? 3. Does such an award of costs relate exclusively to costs upon the motion at Special Term for judgment dismissing the complaint, and the costs in subsequent proceedings consequent thereon in the Appellate Division and the Court o£ Appeals? ”

*F. C. Nicodemus, Jr., Lawrence Greer*and *Appleton D. Palmer*for appellants.

*Charles Haldane*and *David McClure*for respondent.

Order of Appellate Division reversed and that of Special Term affirmed, without costs to either party. First *550two questions certified answered in the negative. Third question answered in the affirmative, on dissenting opinion of Miller, J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ. Absent: Gray, J.
§ 242.207 Certificate components. ( a ) At a minimum, each certificate issued in compliance with this part shall: ( 1 ) Identify the railroad or parent company that is issuing it;
( 2 ) Indicate that the railroad, acting in conformity with this part, has determined that the person to whom it is being issued has been determined to be eligible to perform as a conductor or as a passenger conductor;
( 3 ) Identify the person to whom it is being issued (including the person's name, employee identification number, the year of birth, and either a physical description or photograph of the person);
( 4 ) Identify any conditions or limitations, including the type of service or conditions to ameliorate vision or hearing acuity deficiencies, that restrict the person's operational authority;
( 5 ) Show the effective date of each certification held;
( 6 ) Be signed by an individual designated in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section; and
( 7 ) Be of sufficiently small size to permit being carried in an ordinary pocket wallet.
( b ) Each railroad shall designate in writing any person that it authorizes to sign the certificates described in this section. The designation shall identify such persons by name or job title.
( c ) Nothing in paragraph (a) of this section shall prohibit any railroad from including additional information on the certificate or supplementing the certificate through other documents.
( d ) It shall be unlawful for any railroad to knowingly or any individual to willfully: ( 1 ) Make, cause to be made, or participate in the making of a false entry on that certificate; or
( 2 ) Otherwise falsify that certificate through material misstatement, omission, or mutilation.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 

Received: July 21, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k3t-ad24

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2593

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I have been in the financial services industry for 30 years, and this rule, in my opinion, forces 

small investors to move from commission based accounts to fee based accounts, which in an of 

itself is not necessarily in the best interest of the client. We already have rules on the books that 

require we put the best interest of the client first...this just creates more issues than it solves. 

Where will clients be able to go who have small accounts and do not want to manage their own 

investments? If this rule is enacted, the answer will be No Where. Again, the small investor will 

be penalized for being a small investor. We are supposed to be doing all we can to encourage the 

general public to save for retirement, this rule will put too much of a burden on the general 

public and they will save less instead of more. Our industry should be listened to for alternatives; 

there may be a compromise that would not affect the small investor so greatly.
#### § 236.58 Turnout, fouling section.

Rail joints within the fouling section shall be bonded, and fouling section shall extend at least to a point where sufficient tract centers and allowance for maximum car overhang and width will prevent interference with train, locomotive, or car movement on the adjacent track.

[49 FR 3383, Jan. 26, 1984]
From: Carter David [mailto:dcarter4410@gmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 8:47 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: "RIN 1210-AB32

As a independent broker we need to run our business correctly and on behalf of our clients. 

Taking away our commissions or making it hard to receive will only hurt the consumer as no 

agents will want to help. Why not make all financial planners give up all their needless fees and 

charges. 

We are a trusted safe industry for annuities. ...that are fixed and guaranteed. Why would anyone 

take that away
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 881 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 881

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to prohibit the issuance 
  of a certificate for subminimum wages for individuals with impaired 
                          vision or blindness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2001

 Mr. Isakson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to prohibit the issuance 
  of a certificate for subminimum wages for individuals with impaired 
                          vision or blindness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EMPLOYEES WITH IMPAIRED VISION OR BLINDNESS.

    Section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
214(c)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), (4), and (5) as 
        paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and (6), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new 
        paragraph:
    ``(2) The Secretary shall not issue a certificate under paragraph 
(1) to authorize the payment of wages under subparagraph (A) of such 
paragraph to any individual by reason of such individual's impaired 
vision or blindness. For purposes of this paragraph, the term `impaired 
vision or blindness' means--
            ``(A) any limitation in visual acuity or visual field, 
        including blindness; or
            ``(B) blindness as determined by visual acuity which is no 
        better than 20/200 in the better eye with corrected lenses or 
        visual acuity which, if better than 20/200, is accompanied by a 
        limit to the field of vision in the better eye to such a degree 
        that its widest diameter subtends an angle of no greater than 
        20 degrees.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 299.333 Frog guard rails and guard faces; gauge.

The guard check and guard face gages in frogs shall be within the limits prescribed in the following table:

Table 1 to [§ 299.333](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-299.333)

| Track class | Guard check gage The distance between the gauge line of a frog to the guard line1 of its guard rail or guarding face, measured across the track at right angles to the gauge line,2 may not be less than— | Guard face gage The distance between the guard lines,1 measured across the track at right angles to the gauge line,2 may not be more than— |
| --- | --- | --- |
| H0-H7 | 1,393 mm | 1,358 mm. |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 A line along that side of the flangeway which is nearer to the center of the track and at the same elevation as the gage line. | | |
| 2 A line 14 mm (0.55 inches) below the top of the center line of the head of the running rail, or corresponding location of the tread portion of the track structure. | | |

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER03NO20.004/ER03NO20.004_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER03NO20.004/ER03NO20.004_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER03NO20.005/ER03NO20.005_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER03NO20.005/ER03NO20.005_original_size.png)
#### § 236.310 Signal governing approach to home signal.

A signal shall be provided on main track to govern the approach with the current of traffic to any home signal except where the home signal is the first signal encountered when leaving yards or stations and authorized speed approaching such signal is not higher than slow speed. When authorized speed between home signals on route governed is 20 miles per hour or less, an inoperative signal displaying an aspect indicating “approach next signal prepared to stop” may be used to govern the approach to the home signal.
#### §§ 236.331-236.333 [Reserved]
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
of CNA Financial Corporation
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of CNA Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies that, to his knowledge:  
    the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed on
the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: February 25, 2005 /s/ D. Craig Mense
D. Craig Mense
Chief Financial Officer The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7133

WALTER R.C. STAMPER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; WARDEN, U.S. Penitentiary - Big Sandy, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00170-gec) Submitted: December 20, 2006 Decided: June 14, 2007 Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter R.C. Stamper, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Walter R.C. Stamper seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stamper has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0747.html[7/21/2015 11:31:28 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-uzl6

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0747

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Tommy Fuller

Address:

148 W. Main St

Florencr, 39073

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement. I can take care of my own 401K

Stay out of our retirement plans
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-4419 Filed 9-5-07; 3:46 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M