alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11


                           MERRIMAC INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                       ---------------------------------
                                  (Unaudited)
                                  -----------           
 
                                                          Thirteen Weeks Ended
                                                        -----------------------
                                                         April 3,      April 4,
                                                           1999          1998
                                                        ---------     ---------


Numerator:
Net income available to common shareholders...........   $212,966      $427,546
                                                        =========     =========

Basic earnings per share
------------------------
Weighted average number of shares outstanding for
basic net income per share
Common stock..........................................  1,768,532     1,734,692
                                                        =========     =========
Net income per common share - basic...................       $.12          $.25
                                                             ====          ====
 
Diluted earnings per share
--------------------------
Weighted average number of shares outstanding for
diluted net income per share
Common stock .........................................  1,768,532     1,734,692
Effect of dilutive securities - stock options (1) ....        261        45,290
                                                        ---------     ---------
Weighted average number of shares outstanding for                               
diluted net income per share..........................  1,768,793     1,779,982
                                                        =========     =========
Net income per common share - diluted..................      $.12          $.24
                                                             ====          ==== 
                                                                               
 
(1) Represents additional shares resulting from assumed conversion of
      stock options less shares purchased with the proceeds therefrom.




                                       -1-
From: Kathy Abbott [mailto:kathy.d.abbott@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 12:35 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Regarding Regulatory Guidance USCG-2007-27022

Comments Regarding Regulatory Guidance USCG-2007-27022 

page 19157, II B specific areas 1 and 4 

I am a Clinical Psychologist in the Chicago area who provides neurofeedback treatment 

to individuals with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Mood Disorders. 

Neurofeedback is an empirically validated and widely recognized effective nonmedication treatment for ADHD, as well as other conditions. There are over 50 studies 

evaluating the effectiveness of neurofeedback in the treatment of ADHD, substance use 

disorders and Autism. A recent review of this literature concluded "Neurofeedback meets 

the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry criteria for Clinical 

Guidelines for treatment of ADHD." This means that neurofeedback meets the same 

criteria as medication for treating ADHD, of which 60% of prescriptions are in fact 

prescribed "off label," and that neurofeedback "should always be considered as an 

intervention for this disorder by the clinician." 

This service has been denied by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, United Behavioral Health, 

Blue Cross, Cigna, and Amerigroup. 

This is limitation of an effective and validated treatment for a mental health problem. The 

reasons given by the insurance companies for this denial fell into two categories: 1) our 

company does not cover biofeedback for mental health problems or 2) there is not yet 

sufficient evidence for the efficacy of neurofeedback. As such, they are using evidencebased criteria that are far more restrictive for mental health services than the criteria 

which are used for medical/surgical services. There are many routine medical and 

surgical procedures which have far fewer controlled studies about their efficacy than does 

neurofeedback. These medical and surgical procedures are generally not limited because 

of concerns about how many controlled studies have been performed about them. 

We believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity statute should 

require that employers and plans pay for the same range and scope of services for 

behavioral treatments as they do for medical surgical benefits and that a plan cannot be 

more restrictive in their managed care criteria and reviews for mental health and 

substance abuse disorders when compared to medical surgery. Today plans are being 

more restrictive in how they review evidenced-based mental health and Substance Abuse 

Treatments when compared to medical surgical treatments. This violates both the intent 

and letter of the parity statute and we hope that the regulations will clarify that this can't 

continue. 

 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

 

Sincerely, 
 

Kathy Abbott, Psy. D., P. C. 

Illinois License #: 071-006594
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, August 4, 1995 (109), Para 109.32 Extension of Remarks]
[Page 1293]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.109.32  extension of remarks

  On motion of Mr. DAVIS, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That for the legislative days of Wednesday, August 2, 
Thursday, August 3, and Friday, August 4, 1995, all Members be permitted 
to extend their remarks and to include extraneous material in that 
section of the Congressional Record entitled ``Extension of Remarks''.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 996 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 996

To ensure the timely payment of benefits to eligible persons under the 
       Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2001

 Mr. McInnis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To ensure the timely payment of benefits to eligible persons under the 
       Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RADIATION EXPOSURE COMPENSATION TRUST FUND.

    (a) Appropriations.--There are appropriated, out of any money in 
the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2001, $84,000,000 to the Radiation Exposure Compensation 
Trust Fund to remain available until expended for the purpose of making 
payments to eligible beneficiaries under the Radiation Exposure 
Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note).
    (b) Emergency Requirement.--The entire amount made available under 
subsection (a)--
            (1) shall be available only to the extent that the 
        President submits to Congress an official budget request for up 
        to $84,000,000 that includes designation of the entire amount 
        of the request as an emergency requirement for the purposes of 
        the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
        (2 U.S.C. 900 et seq.); and
            (2) is designated by Congress as an emergency requirement 
        under section 251(b)(2)(A) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
        Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901(b)(2)(A)).
                                 <all>
```
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:42 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30).

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely,

Wayne Lovett 

6949 Park Mesa Way 

San Diego, CA 92111
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 102ND DISTRICT COURT OF BOWIE COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 10th 

day of March, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Leavelle Franklin, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-14-00046-CR

Trial Court No. 13F1053-102

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Leavelle Franklin, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 25th day of November, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
EXHIBIT 31.1 

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Charles E. Drimal, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of PrimeEnergy Management Corporation, the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, certify that:

- I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sterling Gas Drilling Fund 1982
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

November 12, 2003  
/s/ Charles E. Drimal Jr.   
-------------------------------------
  
Charles E. Drimal Jr   
Chief Executive Officer   
PrimeEnergy Management Corporation   
Managing General Partner
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Joseph J. Lazzara, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Scientific Technologies Incorporated for the quarterly
and six month periods ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly represents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Scientific
Technologies Incorporated.

|Dated: August 13, 2003 | By:/s/Joseph J. Lazzara_______              
|---------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|                       | Name: Joseph J. Lazzara                     
|                       | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer







I, Richard O. Faria, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Scientific Technologies Incorporated for the
quarterly and six month periods ended June 30, 2003 fully requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly represents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Scientific
Technologies Incorporated.

|Dated: August 13, 2003 | By:/s/Richard O. Faria_______                    
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------
|                       | Name: Richard O. Faria                           
|                       | Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WALL STREET DELI FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 29,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY>  US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         417,786
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,131,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                   154,141
<INVENTORY>                                    674,635
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,447,091
<PP&E>                                      33,614,032
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,373,554
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,813,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,398,848
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       170,689
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,244,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,813,694
<SALES>                                     49,187,367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            49,187,367
<CGS>                                       44,168,414
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               44,168,414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                54,227
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              90,520
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                783,244
<INCOME-TAX>                                   312,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            471,044
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   471,044
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 28, 1995 (122), Para 122.5 Middle East Peace]
[Page 1461]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.122.5  middle east peace

  On motion of Mr. GILMAN, by unanimous consent, the Committee on 
International Relations was discharged from further consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2404) to extend authorities under the Middle East Peace 
Facilitation Act of 1994 until November 1, 1995, and for other purposes.
  When said bill was considered, read twice, ordered to be engrossed and 
read a third time, was read a third time by title, and passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the bill was passed was, by 
unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: khader@math.utah.edu [mailto:khader@math.utah.edu] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 8:28 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

karim khader 

1025 Kensington Ave 

Salt Lake City, UT 84105
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFlight-testing of the self-repairing flight control system using the F-15 highly integrated digital electronic control flight research facilityFlight tests conducted with the self-repairing flight control system (SRFCS) installed on the NASA F-15 highly integrated digital electronic control aircraft are described. The development leading to the current SRFCS configuration is highlighted. Key objectives of the program are outlined: (1) to flight-evaluate a control reconfiguration strategy with three types of control surface failure; (2) to evaluate a cockpit display that will inform the pilot of the maneuvering capacity of the damage aircraft; and (3) to flight-evaluate the onboard expert system maintenance diagnostics process using representative faults set to occur only under maneuvering conditions. Preliminary flight results addressing the operation of the overall system, as well as the individual technologies, are included.Document ID19900015828Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsStewart, James F.*(NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Facility Edwards, CA, United States)*Shuck, Thomas L.*(NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Facility Edwards, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1990Subject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:101725AIAA PAPER 90-1321H-1635NASA-TM-101725Meeting InformationMeeting: AIAA/SFTE/DGLR/SETP 5th Biannual Flight Test ConferenceLocation: Ontario, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: May 21, 1990End Date: May 24, 1990Accession Number90N25144Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 533-02-21Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900015828.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 238.447 Train operator's controls and power car cab layout. ( a ) Train operator controls in the power car cab shall be arranged so as to minimize the chance of human error, and be comfortably within view and within easy reach when the operator is seated in the normal train control position.
( b ) The train operator's control panel buttons, switches, levers, knobs, and the like shall be distinguishable by sight and by touch.
( c ) An alerter shall be provided in the power car cab. If not acknowledged, the alerter shall cause a brake application to stop the train.
( d ) Power car cab information displays shall be designed with the following characteristics: ( 1 ) Simplicity and standardization shall be the driving criteria for design of formats for the display of information in the cab;
( 2 ) Essential, safety-critical information shall be displayed as a default condition;
( 3 ) Operator selection shall be required to display other than default information;
( 4 ) Cab or train control signals shall be displayed for the operator; and
( 5 ) Displays shall be readable from the operators's normal position under all lighting conditions.
( e ) The power car cab shall be designed so at to permit the crew to have an effective field of view in the forward direction, as well as to the right and left of the direction of travel to observe objects approaching the train from either side. Field-of-view obstructions due to required structural members shall be minimized.
( f ) Each seat provided for an employee regularly assigned to occupy a power car cab and any floor-mounted seat in the cab shall be: ( 1 ) Secured to the car body with an attachment having an ultimate strength capable of withstanding the loads due to the following individually applied accelerations acting on the combined mass of the seat and the mass of a seat occupant who is a 95th-percentile adult male: ( i ) Longitudinal: 12g;
( ii ) Lateral: 4g; and
( iii ) Vertical: 4g;
( 2 ) Designed so that all adjustments have the range necessary to accommodate a person ranging from a 5th-percentile adult female to a 95th-percentile adult male, as persons possessing such characteristics are specified, correcting for clothing as appropriate, in any recognized survey after 1958 of weight, height, and other body dimensions of U.S. adults;
( 3 ) Equipped with lumbar support that is adjustable from the seated position;
( 4 ) Equipped with force-assisted, vertical-height adjustment, operated from the seated position;
( 5 ) Equipped with a manually reclining seat back, adjustable from the seated position;
( 6 ) Equipped with an adjustable headrest; and
( 7 ) Equipped with folding, padded armrests.
( g ) Sharp edges and corners shall be eliminated from the interior of the power car cab, and interior surfaces of the cab likely to be impacted by an employee during a collision or derailment shall be padded with shock-absorbent material.