FORM 10-QSB--QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                        THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                        Quarterly or Transitional Report

                      U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

                    For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2000


[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-11935

                            CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX
         (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                              94-2887133
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602

                      (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000

                           (Issuer's telephone number)

Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act  during the  preceding  12 months (or for such
shorter period that the  registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2)
has been subject to such filing  requirements  for the past 90 days. Yes X No___
<PAGE>

                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

a)

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

                                   (Unaudited)

                          (in thousands, except unit data)

                                  June 30, 2000

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Assets

<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $  691
   Receivables and deposits                                                   1,220
   Restricted escrows                                                           236
   Other assets                                                                 606
   Investment properties:
      Land                                                   $ 11,635
      Buildings and related personal property                  87,996
                                                               99,631
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (47,641)       51,990
                                                                           $ 54,743

Liabilities and Partners' (Deficit) Capital

Liabilities

   Accounts payable                                                          $  273
   Tenant security deposits payable                                             316
   Accrued property taxes                                                       658
   Due to former affiliate                                                      270
   Other liabilities                                                            574
   Mortgage notes payable                                                    59,409

Partners' (Deficit) Capital:
   General partner                                           $ (9,541)
   Limited partners (89,292 units issued and
      outstanding)                                              2,784        (6,757)
                                                                           $ 54,743
</TABLE>

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

<PAGE>

b)

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

                                   (Unaudited)

                          (in thousands, except unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                           Three Months               Six Months
                                          Ended June 30,            Ended June 30,
                                         2000         1999         2000        1999

   Revenues:
<S>                                    <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
      Rental income                    $ 4,193      $ 4,021      $ 8,340      $ 8,089
      Other income                         256          179          421          362
          Total revenues                 4,449        4,200        8,761        8,451
   Expenses:
      Operating                          1,283        1,329        2,723        2,598
      General and administrative            85         (117)         164          189
      Depreciation                         825          749        1,626        1,488
      Interest                           1,214        1,230        2,431        2,463
      Property tax                         325          301          714          599
          Total expenses                 3,732        3,492        7,658        7,337

   Net income                           $ 717        $ 708       $ 1,103      $ 1,114

   Net income allocated to
      general partner                    $ 85         $ 84        $  130        $ 131
   Net income allocated to
      limited partners                    632          624           973          983

                                        $ 717        $ 708       $ 1,103      $ 1,114

   Net income per limited
      partnership unit                  $ 7.08       $ 6.99      $ 10.90      $ 11.01

   Distributions per limited
      partnership unit                 $ 34.82        $ --       $ 34.82      $ 39.23
</TABLE>

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

<PAGE>
c)

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

               CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' (DEFICIT) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)

                          (in thousands, except unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                     Limited
                                   Partnership   General      Limited
                                      Units      Partner     Partners       Total

<S>                                   <C>          <C>        <C>          <C>
Original capital contributions        89,292       $ --       $89,292      $89,292

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at December 31, 1999               89,292     $(9,255)     $ 4,920      $(4,335)

Distributions paid to partners            --        (416)      (3,109)      (3,525)

Net income for the six months
   ended June 30, 2000                    --         130          973        1,103

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at June 30, 2000                   89,292     $(9,541)     $ 2,784      $(6,757)
</TABLE>


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

<PAGE>

d)
                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

                                   (Unaudited)

                                   (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  Six Months Ended
                                                                        June 30,

                                                                  2000        1999
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                             <C>          <C>
  Net income                                                    $ 1,103      $ 1,114
  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
   cash provided by operating activities:
      Depreciation                                                1,626        1,488
      Amortization of loan costs and discount                        50           57
      Change in accounts:
       Receivables and deposits                                    (266)        (150)
       Other assets                                                 (30)         (77)
       Accounts payable                                              93           (8)
       Tenant security deposits payable                               6           --
       Accrued property taxes                                        95           56
       Other liabilities                                            (63)          38
         Net cash provided by operating activities                2,614        2,518

Cash flows from investing activities:

  Property improvements and replacements                         (1,041)        (569)
  Net withdrawals from (deposits to) restricted escrows              84          (57)
         Net cash used in investing activities                     (957)        (626)

Cash flows from financing activities:

  Payment on mortgage notes payable                                (341)        (315)
  Distributions to partners                                      (3,525)      (3,802)
         Net cash used in financing activities                   (3,866)      (4,117)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                        (2,209)      (2,225)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                  2,900        5,138
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                       $  691      $ 2,913

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                        $ 2,381      $ 2,407
</TABLE>


At December 31, 1999 there were approximately  $165,000 of property improvements
and replacements in accounts payable.

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

<PAGE>

e)
                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                     NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)

Note A - Basis of Presentation

The  accompanying   unaudited   consolidated  financial  statements  of  Century
Properties Fund XIX (the  "Partnership" or  "Registrant")  have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial statements.  In the opinion of Fox Capital Management  Corporation,  a
California  corporation,   ("FCMC"  or  the  "Managing  General  Partner"),  all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a
fair  presentation  have been included.  Operating results for the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2000 are not necessarily  indicative of the results
that may be expected for the fiscal year ending  December 31, 2000.  For further
information,  refer  to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  footnotes
thereto  included  in the  Partnership's  Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.

Principles of Consolidation

The Registrant's  financial  statements  include the accounts of Misty Woods CPF
19, LLC, a limited liability  company in which the Registrant  ultimately owns a
100% economic  interest.  All significant  inter-entity  transactions  have been
eliminated.

Note B - Transfer of Control

Pursuant  to a series  of  transactions  which  closed  on  October  1, 1998 and
February 26, 1999,  Insignia Financial Group, Inc. and Insignia Properties Trust
merged into Apartment  Investment and Management Company  ("AIMCO"),  a publicly
traded real estate investment trust, with AIMCO being the surviving  corporation
(the "Insignia Merger").  As a result, AIMCO acquired 100% ownership interest in
the Managing General Partner. The Managing General Partner does not believe that
this  transaction  has had or will have a  material  effect on the  affairs  and
operations of the Partnership.

Note C - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Registrant has no employees and is dependent on the Managing General Partner
and its  affiliates for the management  and  administration  of all  Partnership
activities.   The  Partnership   Agreement  provides  for  certain  payments  to
affiliates for services and as  reimbursement  of certain  expenses  incurred by
affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

The following  payments to the Managing  General Partner and its affiliates were
incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2000 and 1999:

                                                                  2000      1999
                                                                  (in thousands)
 Property management fees (included in operating expenses)        $444      $429
 Reimbursement for services of affiliates (included in
   general and administrative and operating expenses
   and investment properties)                                       88        85
 Partnership management fee (included in general partner
   distributions)                                                  353       228

<PAGE>

During the six months ended June 30, 2000 and 1999,  affiliates  of the Managing
General  Partner were  entitled to receive 5% of gross  receipts from all of the
Registrant's  properties  as  compensation  for  providing  property  management
services.  The Registrant  paid to such  affiliates  approximately  $444,000 and
$429,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  received   reimbursement  of
accountable  administrative  expenses  amounting  to  approximately  $88,000 and
$85,000 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

Pursuant  to  the  Partnership  Agreement,  for  managing  the  affairs  of  the
Partnership, the general partner is entitled to receive a Partnership management
fee  equal  to  10%  of the  Partnership's  adjusted  cash  from  operations  as
distributed.  Approximately $353,000 and $228,000 in Partnership management fees
were paid along  with the  distributions  from  operations  made  during the six
months ended June 30, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

AIMCO and its affiliates  currently own 46,656.66  limited  partnership units in
the Partnership representing 52.252% of the outstanding units. A number of these
units were acquired  pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its  affiliates.
It is possible  that AIMCO or its  affiliates  will make one or more  additional
offers to acquire  additional limited  partnership  interests in the Partnership
for cash or in exchange for units in the operating  partnership of AIMCO.  Under
the  Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders  holding a  majority  of the Units are
entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters. As a result of its
ownership  of  52.252%  of the  outstanding  units,  AIMCO is in a  position  to
influence all voting  decisions with respect to the  Registrant.  When voting on
matters,  AIMCO would in all  likelihood  vote the Units it acquired in a manner
favorable  to the  interest of the  Managing  General  Partner  because of their
affiliation with the Managing General Partner. However, IPLP is required to vote
24,811.66 of its Units:  (i) against any proposal to increase the fees and other
compensation  payable by the Partnership to the Managing General Partner and any
of  its  affiliates;  and  (ii)  on all  other  matters  submitted  by it or its
affiliates,  in  proportion  to the votes cast by non  tendering  unit  holders.
Except for the foregoing,  no other  limitations  are imposed on IPLP's right to
vote its Units.

Note D - Distribution

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2000,  the  Partnership  distributed
approximately  $3,525,000  (approximately  $3,109,000 to the limited partners or
$34.82 per limited partnership unit) from operations.

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  1999,  the  Partnership  distributed
approximately  $3,802,000  (approximately  $3,503,000 to the limited partners or
$39.23 per limited partnership unit).  Approximately  $2,280,000  (approximately
$2,009,000 to the limited  partners or $22.50 per limited  partnership  unit) of
the distribution was from operations and approximately $1,522,000 (approximately
$1,494,000 to the limited partners or $16.73 per limited  partnership  unit) was
from the remaining  proceeds of the sale of Parkside  Village  Apartments in May
1993.

<PAGE>

Note E - Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information

Description  of the types of products  and  services  from which the  reportable
segment derives its revenues:

The  Partnership  has  one  reportable  segment:   residential  properties.  The
Partnership's residential property consists of eight apartment complexes located
in Georgia (3), Arizona (2), Florida (1), Texas (1), and North Carolina (1). The
Partnership rents apartment units to tenants for terms that are typically twelve
months or less.

Measurement of segment profit or loss:

The  Partnership  evaluates  performance  based on segment  profit (loss) before
depreciation.  The accounting policies of the reportable segment are the same as
those of the Partnership as described in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1999.

Factors management used to identify the enterprise's reportable segment:

The  Partnership's  reportable  segment  consists of investment  properties that
offer similar products and services.  Although each of the investment properties
is  managed  separately,  they have been  aggregated  into one  segment  as they
provide services with similar types of products and customers.

Segment  information for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2000 and
1999 is shown in the tables below (in  thousands).  The "Other" column  includes
Partnership administration related items and income and expense not allocated to
the reportable segment.

   Three months ended June 30, 2000    Residential     Other     Totals

Rental income                            $ 4,193       $   --    $ 4,193
Other income                                 255            1        256
Interest expense                           1,214           --      1,214
Depreciation                                 825           --        825
General and administrative expense            --           85         85
Segment profit (loss)                        801          (84)       717


  Three months ended June 30, 1999    Residential     Other      Totals

Rental income                           $ 4,021       $   --     $ 4,021
Other income                                170            9         179
Interest expense                          1,230           --       1,230
Depreciation                                749           --         749
General and administrative expense           --         (117)       (117)
Segment profit (loss)                       582          126         708


    Six months ended June 30, 2000     Residential     Other     Totals

Rental income                            $ 8,340       $   --    $ 8,340
Other income                                 418            3        421
Interest expense                           2,431           --      2,431
Depreciation                               1,626           --      1,626
General and administrative expense            --          164        164
Segment profit (loss)                      1,264         (161)     1,103
Total assets                              54,510          233     54,743
Capital expenditures for investment
  properties                                 876           --        876


   Six months ended June 30, 1999     Residential     Other      Totals

Rental income                           $ 8,089       $   --    $ 8,089
Other income                                327           35        362
Interest expense                          2,463           --      2,463
Depreciation                              1,488           --      1,488
General and administrative expense           --          189        189
Segment profit (loss)                     1,268         (154)     1,114
Total assets                             57,296          921     58,217
Capital expenditures for investment
  properties                                 569           --        569

Note F - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial  Group,  Inc., et al. in the Superior Court of the State of California
for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs  named as defendants,  among others,
the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and several of their affiliated
partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action  purports to assert claims on
behalf of a class of limited  partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of
limited  partnerships  (including  the  Partnership)  which are named as nominal
defendants,  challenging the acquisition of interests in certain general partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. and entities which were, at one time,
affiliates of Insignia; past tender offers by the Insignia affiliates to acquire
limited  partnership  units;  the  management  of  partnerships  by the Insignia
affiliates;  and the Insignia  Merger.  The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and
equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership. On June 25,
1998,  the Managing  General  Partner  filed a motion  seeking  dismissal of the
action.  In lieu of  responding  to the  motion,  the  plaintiffs  have filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims,  subject to final court approval,  on behalf of the Partnership
and all limited  partners  who owned  units as of November 3, 1999.  Preliminary
approval of the settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at
which time the Court set a final approval  hearing for December 10, 1999.  Prior
to the December 10, 1999 hearing,  the Court received various  objections to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying them from the case. The Court will entertain applications for lead
counsel which must be filed by August 4, 2000. The Court has scheduled a hearing
on August 21, 2000 to address the issue of appointing lead counsel. The Managing
General Partner does not anticipate that costs associated with this case will be
material to the Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

<PAGE>

ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The  matters  discussed  in this Form  10-QSB  contain  certain  forward-looking
statements  and  involve  risks and  uncertainties  (including  changing  market
conditions,   competitive  and  regulatory   matters,   etc.)  detailed  in  the
disclosures  contained  in this  Form  10-QSB  and the  other  filings  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission made by the Registrant from time to time. The
discussion of the  Registrant's  business and results of  operations,  including
forward-looking  statements  pertaining  to such  matters,  does not  take  into
account the effects of any changes to the  Registrant's  business and results of
operations.  Accordingly,  actual  results  could differ  materially  from those
projected in the forward-looking  statements as a result of a number of factors,
including those identified herein.

The Partnership's  investment  properties consist of eight apartment  complexes.
The following  table sets forth the average  occupancy of the properties for the
six months ended June 30, 2000 and 1999:

                                                  Average Occupancy

      Property                                     2000       1999

      Sunrunner Apartments                          97%        95%
         St. Petersburg, Florida
      Misty Woods Apartments                        93%        94%
         Charlotte, North Carolina
      McMillan Place Apartments                     96%        97%
         Dallas, Texas
      Vinings Peak Apartments                       96%        95%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Wood Lake Apartments                          95%        95%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Plantation Crossing                           95%        95%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Greenspoint Apartments                        94%        95%
         Phoenix, Arizona
      Sandspoint Apartments                         94%        93%
         Phoenix, Arizona

Results of Operations

The Partnership  realized net income of approximately  $1,103,000 and $1,114,000
for the six month  periods ended June 30, 2000 and 1999,  respectively.  For the
three month periods ended June 30, 2000 and 1999, the  Partnership  realized net
income of approximately $717,000 and $708,000, respectively. The decrease in net
income  for the six month  period  ended  June 30,  2000 is  attributable  to an
increase in total expenses largely offset by an increase in total revenues.  The
increase  in net income for the three  months  ended June 30,  2000 is due to an
increase in total revenues  partially  offset by an increase in total  expenses.
The increase in total  revenues for the three and six month  periods  ended June
30,  2000 is due to an  increase  in rental and other  income.  The  increase in
rental  income  is  the  result  of  increased   rental  rates  at  all  of  the
Partnership's  investment properties.  The increase in other income is primarily
due to an increase in tenant  charges at Sunrunner,  McMillan,  Sandspoint,  and
Wood Lake  Apartments.  The increase in total  expenses for the six month period
ended June 30, 2000 is  primarily  attributable  to an  increase  in  operating,
depreciation,  and property tax expenses. The increase in operating expenses for
the six month period  ended June 30, 2000 is the result of  increased  insurance
expense and increased property expense. For the three months ended June 30, 2000
operating  expenses  decreased as a result of decreased  maintenance  expense at
Misty  Woods,  Wood Ridge,  Plantation  Crossing,  and  Greenspoint  Apartments.
Insurance  expense  increased  as a  result  of the  timing  of the  receipt  of
insurance  premium  invoices in 1999 which  affected  the  recording  of prepaid
insurance  and  related  expenses.  Property  expense  increased  as a result of
increased salary expense and utility costs. The increase in depreciation expense
is the result of the addition of capital  assets during the past twelve  months.
The increase in property tax expense is primarily due to higher  assessed values
at several properties.

The decrease in general and administrative expense during the three months ended
June 30, 1999, is primarily due to the  Partnership  management  fee paid during
the first quarter being correctly accounted for as a distribution to the general
partner.  Included in general and  administrative  expense at both June 30, 2000
and 1999 are  reimbursements  to the Managing  General Partner allowed under the
Partnership  Agreement.  In addition,  costs  associated  with the quarterly and
annual  communications  with  investors and  regulatory  agencies and the annual
audit required by the Partnership Agreement are also included.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the Managing General
Partner monitors the rental market  environment of its investment  properties to
assess the feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy
levels and protecting  the  Partnership  from increases in expenses.  As part of
this plan, the Managing General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from
the burden of  inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and
maintaining a high overall  occupancy  level.  However,  due to changing  market
conditions,  which  can  result  in the use of  rental  concessions  and  rental
reductions to offset softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the
Managing General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2000, the Registrant had cash and cash  equivalents of approximately
$691,000 as compared to  approximately  $2,913,000 at June 30, 1999. For the six
months ended June 30, 2000, cash and cash  equivalents  decreased  approximately
$2,209,000 from the  Registrant's  year ended December 31, 1999. The decrease in
cash and cash  equivalents  is due to  approximately  $3,866,000 of cash used in
financing  activities  and  approximately  $957,000  of cash  used in  investing
activities  partially  offset by  approximately  $2,614,000  of cash provided by
operating  activities.  Net  cash  used in  financing  activities  consisted  of
distributions to partners and, to a lesser extent, payments of principal made on
the mortgages encumbering the Registrant's investment properties.  Net cash used
in investing  activities  consisted  of capital  improvements  and  replacements
partially  offset by net withdrawals from restricted  escrows  maintained by the
mortgage lenders.  The Partnership invests its working capital reserves in money
market accounts.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  has  made  available  to the
Partnership  a  credit  line  of  up to  $150,000  per  property  owned  by  the
Partnership.  The Partnership has no outstanding  amounts due under this line of
credit. Based on present plans, the Managing General Partner does not anticipate
the need to borrow in the near future. Other than cash and cash equivalents, the
line of credit is the Partnership's only unused source of liquidity.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures  required at the  properties  to  adequately  maintain the physical
assets and other  operating  needs of the Registrant and to comply with Federal,
state, and local legal and regulatory requirements. Capital improvements planned
for each of the Registrant's properties are detailed below.

Sunrunner Apartments

Approximately  $131,000 has been budgeted for 2000 for capital  improvements  at
Sunrunner  consisting  primarily  of  carpet  and vinyl  replacements,  plumbing
improvements, and major landscaping.  During the six months ended June 30, 2000,
the  Partnership   completed   approximately  $64,000  of  capital  improvements
consisting  primarily of carpet and vinyl replacement,  major  landscaping,  and
pool  improvements.  These  improvements were funded from replacement  reserves.
Additional  improvements  may be  considered  and will  depend  on the  physical
condition of the property as well as replacement  reserves and anticipated  cash
flow generated by the property.

Misty Woods Apartments

Approximately  $68,000 has been  budgeted for 2000 for capital  improvements  at
Misty Woods  consisting  primarily of carpet and vinyl  replacements,  appliance
replacements,  wall coverings,  counter tops, and lighting upgrades.  During the
six months ended June 30, 2000, the Partnership completed approximately $101,000
of budgeted and unbudgeted capital improvements consisting primarily of building
improvements,  carpet and vinyl replacement,  office equipment,  wall coverings,
and land  improvements.  These improvements were funded from operating cash flow
and replacement  reserves.  Additional  improvements  may be considered and will
depend on the physical condition of the property as well as replacement reserves
and anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

McMillian Place Apartments

Approximately  $277,000 has been budgeted for 2000 for capital  improvements  at
McMillian Place consisting primarily of appliance replacement,  carpet and vinyl
replacements,  interior decorating, and exterior painting. During the six months
ended June 30, 2000, the Partnership completed approximately $110,000 of capital
improvements  consisting primarily of appliances,  floor covering  replacements,
and air conditioning replacements. These improvements were funded from operating
cash flow.  Additional  improvements  may be  considered  and will depend on the
physical  condition  of  the  property  as  well  as  replacement  reserves  and
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Vinings Peak Apartments

Approximately  $245,000 has been budgeted for 2000 for capital  improvements  at
Vinings Peak consisting  primarily of carpet and vinyl  replacements,  appliance
replacements, wall coverings, and HVAC replacements. During the six months ended
June 30,  2000,  the  Partnership  completed  approximately  $124,000 of capital
improvements  consisting  primarily  of  carpet  and  vinyl  replacement,   wall
coverings,  and a  submetering  project.  These  improvements  were  funded from
operating cash flow.  Additional  improvements may be considered and will depend
on the physical  condition of the property as well as  replacement  reserves and
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Wood Lake Apartments

Approximately  $214,000 has been budgeted for 2000 for capital  improvements  at
Wood Lake consisting primarily of carpet and vinyl replacements, wall coverings,
appliance replacement,  and HVAC replacements.  During the six months ended June
30,  2000,  the  Partnership   completed   approximately   $142,000  of  capital
improvements  consisting primarily of plumbing and carpet and vinyl replacement,
wall coverings,  and plumbing enhancements.  These improvements were funded from
operating cash flow.  Additional  improvements may be considered and will depend
on the physical  condition of the property as well as  replacement  reserves and
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Plantation Crossing Apartments

Approximately  $143,000 has been budgeted for 2000 for capital  improvements  at
Plantation Crossing consisting primarily of carpet and vinyl replacements,  wall
coverings,  and  appliance  replacements.  During the six months  ended June 30,
2000, the Partnership completed  approximately  $136,000 of capital improvements
consisting  primarily of major landscaping,  submetering  equipment,  carpet and
vinyl  replacement,  and appliance  replacement.  These improvements were funded
from operating  cash flow.  Additional  improvements  may be considered and will
depend on the physical condition of the property as well as replacement reserves
and anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Greenspoint Apartments

Approximately  $121,000 has been budgeted for 2000 for capital  improvements  at
Greenspoint  consisting  primarily  of  carpet  and  vinyl  replacements,  major
landscaping,  lighting upgrades,  HVAC replacements,  and plumbing improvements.
During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2000,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately  $102,000 of capital  improvements  consisting  primarily of major
landscaping,  floor covering  replacements,  and appliances.  These improvements
were funded from operating cash flow. Additional  improvements may be considered
and will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as replacement
reserves and anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Sandspoint Apartments

Approximately  $154,000 has been budgeted for 2000 for capital  improvements  at
Sands  Point  consisting  primarily  of  carpet  and vinyl  replacements,  major
landscaping,  roof replacements,  exterior painting, plumbing improvements,  and
parking  lot  resurfacing.  During  the six  months  ended  June 30,  2000,  the
Partnership completed  approximately $97,000 of capital improvements  consisting
primarily of plumbing enhancements,  appliances,  roof replacements,  and carpet
and vinyl replacement.  These improvements were funded from operating cash flow.
Additional  improvements  may be  considered  and will  depend  on the  physical
condition of the property as well as replacement  reserves and anticipated  cash
flow generated by the property.

The additional  capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available
from operations or from Partnership  reserves.  To the extent that such budgeted
capital improvements are completed, the Registrant's distributable cash flow, if
any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The Partnership's  current assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term
needs  (exclusive  of capital  improvements)  of the  Partnership.  The mortgage
indebtedness of approximately  $59,409,000,  net of discount,  is amortized over
varying  periods with  required  balloon  payments  ranging from October 2002 to
January  2006.  The Managing  General  Partner  will  attempt to refinance  such
indebtedness  and/or sell the properties  prior to such maturity  dates.  If the
properties cannot be refinanced or sold for a sufficient  amount, the Registrant
will risk losing such properties through foreclosure.

The Registrant was prohibited from making  distributions  from the operations of
the Registrant  until the mortgages  encumbering  McMillan Place were satisfied.
However, under the terms of the debt restructuring obtained on McMillan Place on
January 29, 1998, the Registrant is now permitted to make distributions from the
operations  of the  Registrant's  other  investment  properties.  During the six
months ended June 30, 2000, the Partnership distributed approximately $3,525,000
(approximately  $3,109,000  to  the  limited  partners  or  $34.82  per  limited
partnership  unit) from  operations.  During the six months ended June 30, 1999,
the Partnership distributed  approximately $3,802,000  (approximately $3,503,000
to the limited partners or $39.23 per limited  partnership unit).  Approximately
$2,280,000  (approximately  $2,009,000  to the  limited  partners  or $22.50 per
limited   partnership   unit)  of  the  distribution  was  from  operations  and
approximately  $1,522,000  (approximately  $1,494,000 to the limited  partner or
$16.73 per limited partnership unit) was from the remaining proceeds of the sale
of Parkside  Village  Apartments  in May 1993.  The  Partnership's  distribution
policy is reviewed on a semi-annual basis. Future cash distributions will depend
on the levels of net cash generated from  operations,  the  availability of cash
reserves and the timing of debt maturities, refinancings, and/or property sales.
There  can  be  no  assurance,  however,  that  the  Partnership  will  generate
sufficient funds from operations  after required capital  expenditures to permit
any further distributions to its partners in 2000 or subsequent periods.

<PAGE>

                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial  Group,  Inc., et al. in the Superior Court of the State of California
for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs  named as defendants,  among others,
the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and several of their affiliated
partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action  purports to assert claims on
behalf of a class of limited  partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of
limited  partnerships  (including  the  Partnership)  which are named as nominal
defendants,  challenging the acquisition of interests in certain general partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. and entities which were, at one time,
affiliates of Insignia; past tender offers by the Insignia affiliates to acquire
limited  partnership  units;  the  management  of  partnerships  by the Insignia
affiliates;  and the Insignia  Merger.  The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and
equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership. On June 25,
1998,  the Managing  General  Partner  filed a motion  seeking  dismissal of the
action.  In lieu of  responding  to the  motion,  the  plaintiffs  have filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims,  subject to final court approval,  on behalf of the Partnership
and all limited  partners  who owned  units as of November 3, 1999.  Preliminary
approval of the settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at
which time the Court set a final approval  hearing for December 10, 1999.  Prior
to the December 10, 1999 hearing,  the Court received various  objections to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying them from the case. The Court will entertain applications for lead
counsel which must be filed by August 4, 2000. The Court has scheduled a hearing
on August 21, 2000 to address the issue of appointing lead counsel. The Managing
General Partner does not anticipate that costs associated with this case will be
material to the Partnership's overall operations.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a)    Exhibits:

                  Exhibit 27, Financial Data Schedule, is filed as an exhibit to
                  this report.

            b)    Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended June 30, 2000.

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.

                                    CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                                    By:   FOX PARTNERS II
                                          Its General Partner

                                    By:   FOX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
                                          Its Managing General Partner

                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President

                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Controller

                                    Date: