alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 218.73 Warning signal display. ( a ) Warning signals, *i.e.,* a white disk with the words “Occupied Camp Car” in black lettering during daylight hours and an illuminated white signal at night, displayed in accordance with § 218.75, § 218.77, or § 218.79 signify that employees are in, around, or in the vicinity of camp cars. Once the signals have been displayed— ( 1 ) The camp cars may not be moved for coupling to other rolling equipment or moved to another location;
( 2 ) Rolling equipment may not be placed on the same track so as to reduce or block the view of a warning signal; and
( 3 ) Rolling equipment may not pass a warning signal.
( b ) Warning signals indicating the presence of occupied camp cars, displayed in accordance with §§ 218.75 and 218.79, shall be displayed by a designated occupant of the camp cars or that person's immediate supervisor. The signal(s) shall be displayed as soon as such cars are placed on the track, and such signals may only be removed by those same individuals prior to the time the cars are moved to another location.
#### § 367.20 [Reserved]
EX-10.27 DESCRIPTION OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION



 





Exhibit 10.27




Summary Description of ebank Financial Services, Inc.

Director Compensation Arrangements



As of January 23, 2006, the Company’s current compensation arrangement with the members of its
Board of Directors is as follows:




Directors who are employees



Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive any additional compensation for their
services as members of the Board of Directors (or as members of any committees thereof).




Non-employee directors (other than our chairman)



The Company pays non-employee directors $500 for each board meeting attended in person. No amount
is paid for attendance via telephone conference at any regularly scheduled board meeting. However,
to the extent a special meeting of the Board of Directors is called, any non-employee board member
who attends via telephone conference is paid $100.



Additionally, each non-employee director is granted, on an annual basis, a stock option to purchase
10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan upon the
condition that each such director attended at least 75% of all meetings of the Board of Directors
during the Company’s previous fiscal year.



Further, the Company pays its Audit Committee Chairman $300 for each audit committee meeting
attended in person and pays the other Audit Committee Members $150 for each audit committee meeting
attended in person. The Company pays its Compensation Committee Members (including the Chairman of
this committee) $100 for each committee meeting attended in person. No amount is paid by the
Company for committee meetings where a committee member attends via teleconference.




Chairman of the Board



The Company pays its Chairman of the Board $5,000 per month in director’s fees and does pay any
additional fees for meeting attendance. The Company also pays on the behalf of the Chairman of the
Board certain athletic club dues (amounting to approximately $1,428 in 2005).



With respect to all directors, the Company typically does not reimburse its directors for
out-of-pocket expenses they incur in connection with their attendance at meetings except for
airfare.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Defense Acquisition University Board of Visitors Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The next meeting of the Defense Acquisition University (DAU) Board of Visitors (BoV) will be held at Defense Acquisition University, Mid-Atlantic Region, California, MD. The purpose of this meeting is to report back to the BoV on continuing items of interest.

# DATES:

September 26, 2007 from 0900-1500.

# ADDRESSES:

23330 Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 200, California, MD 20619.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Christen Goulding at 703-805-5134.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public; however, because of space limitations, allocation of seating will be made on a first-come, first served basis. Persons desiring to attend the meeting should call Ms. Christen Goulding at 703-805-5134.

Dated: September 4, 2007.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 07-4407  Filed 9-07-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, October 18, 1995 (130), Para 130.16 Defense Appropriations]
[Page 1547]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.130.16  defense appropriations

  On motion of Mr. YOUNG of Florida, by unanimous consent, the bill 
(H.R. 2126) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes; together 
with the amendment of the Senate thereto, was taken from the Speaker's 
table.
  When on motion of Mr. YOUNG of Florida, it was,
  Resolved, That the House insists on its disagreement to the amendment 
of the Senate and ask a further conference with the Senate on the 
disagreeing votes of the two Houses thereon.
```
----

----

| CLECO POWER LLC | EXHIBIT32.3 |
|-----------------|-------------|

|   Cleco      Power LLC                  |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO                    |
| 18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      |
| AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       |
| SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002 |

| (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

| Date:  February      25, 2010     |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/  Michael      H. Madison                          |
| Michael      H. MadisonChief      Executive Officer             |

----

----
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John C.
Osterman, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ John C. Osterman
------------------------------
Name: John C. Osterman
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  March 29, 2005

                                       45
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Martin Tyrrell, Appellant.

Judgment reversed. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
**EXHIBIT
23.1**
 
 
 
 **OHIO EDISON
COMPANY**
 
 **CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 We hereby consent
to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3
(No. 33-49413, 33-51139, 333-01489 and 333-05277) of Ohio Edison Company of our
report dated March 7, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements,
management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
which appears in the Annual Report to Stockholders, which is incorporated in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated March 7, 2005 relating to the financial statement
schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.
 
 
 
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
 
 Cleveland,
Ohio
 March 7,
2005
PETITION TO: SECRETARY THOMAS E. PEREZ, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Millions of Americans like me are counting on our 401(k) plans and individual retirement accounts for a secure
financial future — and we've worked hard to build and grow our savings. These plans often involve complex
financial decisions, so many of us have to use investment professionals for guidance. Loopholes in the current
law make it easy for some on Wail Street to take advantage of hardworking Americans and line their own
pockets with our retirement savings. Last year alone, hidden fees, unfair risk, and bad investment advice
reduced Americans’ retirement savings by ag much as $17 billion. It's time to close this loophole and ensure a
high standard that holds anyone who gives financial advice genuinely accountable for helping us choose the best
investments. As one of your constituents, I'm counting on you to work to close the loophole now.

Since rely,

2)
Merwe \aep/
Mrs. Mourlyn Bapp
HLOUSSXXXB 1226577037 Ormond Beach, FL 32176-3544
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, November 2, 1995 (139), Para 139.5 Message from the Senate]
[Page 1829]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.139.5  message from the senate

  A message from the Senate by Mr. Lundregan, one of its clerks, 
announced that the Senate agrees to the report of the committee of 
conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on the amendments 
of the Senate to the bill (H.R. 1868) ``An Act making appropriations for 
foreign operations, export financing, and related programs for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes,'' with an 
amendment.
```
#### § 236.719 Circuit, acknowledgment.

A circuit consisting of wire or other conducting material installed between the track rails at each signal in territory where an automatic train stop system or cab signal system of the continuous inductive type with 2-indication cab signals is in service, to enforce acknowledgement by the engineman at each signal displaying an aspect requiring a stop.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, November 1, 1995 (138), Para 138.8 Partial-Birth Abortions]
[Page 1823]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.138.8  partial-birth abortions

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HANSEN, pursuant to House Resolution 251 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the consideration of the bill 
(H.R. 1833) to amend title 18, United States Code, to ban partial-birth 
abortions.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HANSEN, by unanimous consent, designated 
Mr. EMERSON as Chairman of the Committee of the Whole; and after some 
time spent therein,
```
Presidential Documents

50035 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 168 

Thursday, August 30, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2007–28 of August 16, 2007 

Presidential Determination on Continuation of U.S. Drug 

Interdiction Assistance to the Government of Colombia 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of Defense 

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 1012 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995, as amended (22 U.S.C. 

2291–4), I hereby certify, with respect to Colombia, that: (1) interdiction 

of aircraft reasonably suspected to be primarily engaged in illicit drug trafficking in that country’s airspace is necessary because of the extraordinary 

threat posed by illicit drug trafficking to the national security of that country; 

and (2) that country has appropriate procedures in place to protect against 

innocent loss of life in the air and on the ground in connection with 

such interdiction, which shall at a minimum include effective means to 

identify and warn an aircraft before the use of force is directed against 

the aircraft. 

The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the Federal Register and to notify the Congress of this determination. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, August 16, 2007. 

[FR Doc. 07–4284 

Filed 8–29–07; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES3GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
HVACMOTORSDIRECT CURRENT(DC)U FRAMEMOTORSBRAKEMOTORSVECTORDUTYINVERTERDUTYMULTI-SPEEDTHREE PHASEC-FACE SINGLE &THREE PHASEEXPLOSIONPROOFSEVEREDUTYGEN. PURPOSETHREE PHASEGEN. PURPOSESINGLE PHASE



# www.emersonmotors.com 13 ® 

### APPLICATIONS: Designed for air compressors, pumps, conveyors, blowers and general industrial equipment. 202



### FEATURES:

Double Shielded Ball Bearings * Rigid Base Standard * Class A or B Insulation, Continuous Duty, 40C Ambient * F1 Assembly * Reversible Rotation *

Voltage List Catalog Number Frame "C" Dim. (inches) Multiplier Symbol Ship Wt (lbs) Notes HP RPM 

# C Face Footed
Full Load Amps SF 6185 6.2/3.1 24 16 9.9 $227 115/208-230 56C 1/4 1800 DS-3FMP 1.35 D13C2PC 7.6/3.8 25 19 10.1 $273 115/230 56C 1/3 1800 DS-3FMP 1.35 D12C2PC 9.0/4.5 25 22 10.0 $292 115/230 56C 1/2 1800 DS-3F 1.25 D34C2PC 11.2/5.6 25 26 10.8 $356 115/230 56C 3/4 1800 DS-3FMP 1.25 D1C2P14C 14.4/7.2 25 40 12.2 $409 115/230 145TC 1 1800 DS-3FMP 1.15 6188 13.6/6.8 24 20 11.1 $362 115/230 56C 1800 DS-3FMP 1.25 6180 20.8/10.4 25 43 12.8 $431 115/230 145TC 1-1/2 1800 DS-3FMP 1.15 D2C2P18C 23.2/11.6 18 72 15.8 $588 115/230 182TC 2 1800 DS-3SP 1.15 D3C1P18C 32.0/16.0 18 83 17.9 $718 115/230 182TC 3 3600 DS-3SP 1.15 D3C2P18C 38.0/19.0 18 68 15.8 $723 115/230 184TC 1800 DS-3SP 1.15 D5C1K18C 19.6 18 84 17.9 $801 230 184TC 5 3600 DS-3SP 1.15 D5C2K18C 22.0 18 88 17.9 $898 230 184TC 1800 DS-3SP 1.15 D5C2K21C 22.0 25 100 19.4 $959 230 213TC 1800 DS-3SP 1.15 D7C1K21C 30.4 25 136 19.4 $1,352 230 213TC 7-1/2 3600 DS-3PO 1.15 D7C2K21C 35.6 25 105 20.9 $1,098 230 215TC 1800 DS-3SP 1.15 D10C1K21C 40 25 168 20.9 $1,555 230 215TC 10 3600 DS-3SP 1.15 D10C2K21C 42 25 110 20.9 $1,233 230 215TC 1800 DS-3SP 1.15

Note 18 Incorporates Run Capacitor Note 24 Note 25 Non-protected Automatic Reset Thermal Overload Protector 

# General Purpose Single Phase Open Dripproof (ODP) Capacitor Start
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mammatech Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 2007, (the
"Report"), I, Henry S. Pennypacker, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.


Date:  January 10, 2008
                                   /s/ Henry S. Pennypacker
                                   ---------------------------------------
                                   Henry S. Pennypacker, Chief Executive Officer




                                       13
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, November 2, 1995 (139), Para 139.24 Subsequent Action on a Reported Bill Sequentially Referred]
[Page 1871]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.139.24  subsequent action on a reported bill sequentially referred

  Under clause 5 of rule X the following action was taken by the 
Speaker:

       H.R. 1816. Referral to the Committee on Commerce extended 
     for a period ending not later than November 17, 1995.
```
#### McClure *v.*Locke.

The fact that one pays fees not allowed by law to an officer for serving a writ and attaching property without calling his attention to the items illegally charged, is not a waiver of the right to recover the penalty for taking illegal fees.

Debt, for a penalty for taking illegal fees. The defendant is a deputy sheriff, and served two writs for the plaintiff, attaching personal property upon the first, and real estate upon the second. On the first he charged, services, $1.00; travel, $0.24; attachment, $1.00; — and upon the second, service, $0.50 ; travel, $0.12; paid clerk, $0.20; copy, $1.00; service, $0.50; travel, $0.12. The second writ contained 600 words. The defendant, without furnishing items of his charges, demanded and received of the plaintiff $2.44 upon each writ.

*W. W.*Bailey, for the plaintiff.

*Norris 8f*Band, for the defendant.

Allen, J.

On the first writ the charge of $1 for services was illegal, if there was but one defendant in the action upon whom service was made. The sheriff’s fee for serving a writ is 50 cents, with six cents for necessary travel each way. G. L., *c.*290, s. 14. Service of writs is made by giving to the defendant or leaving at his abode a summons, where property is attached; and in other cases, by giving or leaving a copy, or by reading the writ to the defendant. G. L., *c.*223, *ss.*2, 3. In making an attachment, nothing of this kind is done; and an attachment of property is in no sense a service of the writ. On the second writ there were charges for two services of 50 cents each. If there was but one defendant, one charge was illegal. The charge of $1 for the copy of the writ containing 600 words was in excess of the legal rate. The sheriff is a certifying officer, and the defendant was entitled to charge for the copy, two pages, 34 cents ; part of a page, 12 cents; *15certificate of attestation, 8 cents; in all, 54 cents. G. L., *c.*290, *s.*3. The balance of the charge for the copy was illegal.

For taking greater fees than are allowed by law for serving writs the defendant incurred the penalty provided by statute for such cases, and the plaintiff might sue for the same, as he has done (G. L., *c.*290, s. 27), or the defendant might be prosecuted by indictment. G. L., *c.*290, s. 28. The defendant refused to give the items of his charges at the timo he demanded and received his pay, and the plaintiff had no opportunity to point out or demur to the illegal charges. The fact that the plaintiff paid the sum demanded without pointing out the particular items of illegal charge was no waiver of his right to exact the forfeiture of the penalty. It was the demanding and taking of the illegal fees by the defendant that constituted the offence, and made him liable to the plaintiff’s action for a penalty.

*Case discharged.*

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
§ 375.203 What actions of an individual shipper may limit or reduce my normal liability? ( a ) If an individual shipper includes perishable, dangerous, or hazardous articles in the shipment without your knowledge, you need not assume liability for those articles or for the loss or damage caused by their inclusion in the shipment. If the shipper requests that you accept such articles for transportation, you may elect to limit your liability for any loss or damage by appropriately published tariff provisions.
( b ) If an individual shipper agrees to ship household goods released at a value greater than 60 cents per pound ($1.32 per kilogram) per article, your liability for loss and damage may be limited to $100 per pound ($220 per kilogram) per article if the individual shipper fails to notify you in writing of articles valued at more than $100 per pound ($220 per kilogram).
( c ) If an individual shipper notifies you in writing that an article valued at greater than $100 per pound ($220 per kilogram) will be included in the shipment, the shipper will be entitled to full recovery up to the declared value of the article or articles, not to exceed the declared value of the entire shipment.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23
                                                                      ----------

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
CMI Corporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form
S-8 (No. 33-66274) of CMI Corporation of our report dated February 23, 1998,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of CMI Corporation and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of
earnings, changes in common stock and other capital, and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which report appears
in the December 31, 1997, annual report on Form 10-K of CMI Corporation.



                                                           KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
March 27, 1998
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.273 General. ( a ) The pipeline must be designed and installed so that each joint will sustain the longitudinal pullout or thrust forces caused by contraction or expansion of the piping or by anticipated external or internal loading.
( b ) Each joint must be made in accordance with written procedures that have been proven by test or experience to produce strong gastight joints.
( c ) Each joint must be inspected to insure compliance with this subpart.
<PAGE>   1



                                                             EXHIBIT 10.2(d)(2)
                                                             ------------------

                                EKCO GROUP, INC.
                                   SCHEDULE TO
                    FORM OF INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT


<TABLE>
     The below-named employee of the Company has the following Incentive Stock
Option Agreements with the Company pursuant to the Company's 1987 Stock Option
Plan which agreements are identical in form to the foregoing Form of Incentive
Stock Option Agreement except as to the dates, number of shares granted and
exercise prices:

<CAPTION>
                                          No. of
                                          Shares      Exercise
Name and Position       Grant Date        Granted     Price
-----------------       ----------        -------     --------

<S>                     <C>               <C>         <C>    
Robert Varakian         02-28-94          50,000      $7.3125
Vice President, Mar-    01-24-95           8,000      $6.3125
 keting, Ekco Group,    02-06-96           8,000      $5.9375
 Inc.
Senior Vice President,
 Marketing & Sales
 Ekco Housewares, Inc.
President, B. VIA
 International House-
 wares, Inc.

</TABLE>