alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
related Form 10-K financial statements for Ohio Edison Company and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
(Amounts in 1,000's.) Income tax expense includes $20,963,000 related
to other income.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000073960
<NAME> OHIO EDISON COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    4,620,732
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  1,409,662
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         821,672
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     1,848,680
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,700,746
<COMMON>                                             1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    2,098,728
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            525,731
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               2,624,460
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          140,000
<PREFERRED>                                    200,070
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,175,812
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             198,322
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 159,974
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  414,544
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        5,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 3,294
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,779,270
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                8,700,746
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    2,686,949
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           191,835
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,043,035
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,213,907
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        473,042
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              45,846
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 518,888
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       221,199
<NET-INCOME>                                   297,689
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     11,547
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  286,142
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       347,003
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      184,707
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         791,901
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 862

To amend title 38, United States Code, to add Diabetes Mellitus (Type

2) to the list of diseases presumed to be service-connected for veterans

exposed to certain herbicide agents.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 2001

Mr. EVANS (for himself, Mr. FILNER, Mr. REYES, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr.

RODRIGUEZ, Mr. SHOWS, Mr. BONIOR, Mr. CONDIT, Mr. CRAMER, Mr.

EDWARDS, Mr. FRANK, Mr. FROST, Mr. KLECZKA, Ms. MCKINNEY, Mr.

MASCARA, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mr. PASCRELL, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms.

BALDWIN, and Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to add Diabetes

Mellitus (Type 2) to the list of diseases presumed to

be service-connected for veterans exposed to certain herbicide agents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 862 IH

1 SECTION 1. PRESUMPTION THAT DIABETES MELLITUS

2 (TYPE 2) IS SERVICE-CONNECTED.

3 Section 1116(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code,

4 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub5 paragraph:

6 ‘‘(H) Diabetes Mellitus (Type 2).’’.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# Time and Date:

9:30 a.m., Tuesday, September 11, 2007.

# Place:

NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20594.

# Status:

The two items are open to the public.

# Matter to be Considered:

1124C, Motorcycle Safety Recommendation Letters.

                        7833a,                         *Railroad Accident Report*                        —Derailment of Chicago Transit Authority Train Number 220 Between Clark/Lake and Grand/Milwaukee Stations, Chicago, Illinois, July 11, 2006.                    

# News Media Contact:

Telephone: (202) 314-6100.

Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Chris Bisett at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, September 7, 2007.

                        The public may view the meeting via alive or archived webcast by accessing a link under “News & Events” on the NTSB home page at                         *http://www.ntsb.gov*.                    

# For More Information Contact:

Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

Dated: August 31, 2007.

Vicky D'Onofrio,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-4352  Filed 8-31-07; 12:52 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 139 (Friday, July 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39801-39802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3536]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Public Hearing and Notice of Availability for the Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement for the Matagorda Ship Channel 
Improvement Project, Calhoun County and Matagorda County, TX

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Extension of comment period and rescheduling of Public Hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Notice of Availability for the Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement (DEIS) published in the Federal Register on Friday, May 18, 
2007 (72 FR 28032), required comments be submitted on or before July 2, 
2007. An editorial correction of the Notice document was published in 
the Federal Register on Thursday, June 2, 2007 (72 FR 31660). The 
comment period has been extended to September 4, 2007. Additionally, 
the June 5, 2007, Public Hearing on the proposed project has been 
rescheduled to August 9, 2007, at the Bauer Community Center, 2300 
North Highway 35, Port Lavaca, TX 77979. Poster presentations will be 
available for viewing and project team members will be present to 
discuss the

[[Page 39802]]

DEIS at a Workshop that will precede the Public Hearing. The Workshop 
will be conducted from 5 p.m. to 6:45 p.m. and the formal Public 
Hearing will comment at 7 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Denise Sloan, Regulatory Project 
Manager, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Galveston District, P.O. Box 
1229, Galveston, TX 77553-1229, (409) 766-3962.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-3536 Filed 7-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-52-M
```

[112th Congress Public Law 258]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 2414]]

Public Law 112-258
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend section 2710 of title 18, United States Code, to clarify that a 
 video tape service provider may obtain a consumer's informed, written 
consent on an ongoing basis and that consent may be obtained through the 
            Internet. <<NOTE: Jan. 10, 2013 -  [H.R. 6671]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Video Privacy 
Protection Act Amendments Act of 2012.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 18 USC 1 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Video Privacy Protection Act 
Amendments Act of 2012''.
SEC. 2. VIDEO PRIVACY PROTECTION ACT AMENDMENT.

    Section 2710(b)(2) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:
            ``(B) to any person with the informed, written consent 
        (including through an electronic means using the Internet) of 
        the consumer that--
                    ``(i) is in a form distinct and separate from any 
                form setting forth other legal or financial obligations 
                of the consumer;
                    ``(ii) at the election of the consumer--
                          ``(I) is given at the time the disclosure is 
                      sought; or
                          ``(II) is given in advance for a set period of 
                      time, not to exceed 2 years or until consent is 
                      withdrawn by the consumer, whichever is sooner; 
                      and
                    ``(iii) the video tape service provider has provided 
                an opportunity, in a clear and conspicuous manner, for 
                the consumer to withdraw on a case-by-case basis or to 
                withdraw from ongoing disclosures, at the consumer's 
                election;''.

    Approved January 10, 2013.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6671:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            Dec. 18, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 20, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### Frances C. Duryea et al., as Executors of William Duryea, Deceased, Appellants, *v.*Otto E. Lohrke et al., Respondents.

*Duryea*v. *Lohrke,*136 App. Div. 555, affirmed.

(Argued May 3, 1911;

decided May 19, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 4, 1910, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict in an action on contract.

*Robert B. Honeyman*for appellants.

*Herman Aaron*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
## Summary of Directions for the Approved/Proposed Uses of **METRAFENONE**

.

**Use Site Aerial and/or** 

**Ground Application**  **Identified by Equipment/Lab**  **el Restriction Applicatio** 

**n Method Type**  **Desc Formulation** 

**Desc Application** 

**Rate (lb**  **ai/A) Max** 

**Single App**  **Rate (lb**  **ai/A) Max #** 

**Apps / Year**  **A. I. Max App**

**Rate/Year (lb**  **ai/A) Minimum** 

**Retreatment Interval**  **Registration**

**Numbers Use Directions and Limitations** 

Grapes Ground,

handheld, aerial Broadcast.

Foliar application Liquid (SC) 0.2

-0.3 0.3 3 0.9 14 7969

-284 No more than two sequential treatments before another mode of action

Pome Ground,

handheld, aerial Broadcast.

Foliar application Liquid (SC) 0.2

-0.3 0.3 3 0.9 7 7969

-284 No more than two sequential treatments before another mode of action
N O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### NO. CAAP-20-0000052

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
WILLIAM KEAHIOLALO, Petitioner-Appellant; TONI KEAHIOLALO, Petitioner-Appellee, v. HANNAH DAVID, Respondent-Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

(CASE NO. FC-DA 19-1-0287)

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL ( By: Chan, Presiding Judge, Hiraoka and Wadsworth, JJ.) Upon consideration of the Stipulation to Dismiss Appeal, filed September 9, 2020, by Petitioner-Appellant William Keahiolalo, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that (1) the appeal has been docketed; (2) the parties stipulate to dismiss the appeal; (3) the Stipulation to Dismiss Appeal is dated and signed by counsel for all parties appearing in the appeal; and (4) dismissal is authorized by Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 42(b). 1

1 Under HRAP Rule 2, the court suspends the requirement in HRAP Rule 42(b) that a stipulation to dismiss an appeal specify the terms as to payment of costs, which the parties omitted from the Stipulation to Dismiss Appeal. 

### Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-20-0000052 11-SEP-2020 09:46 AMN O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R 

### Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation to Dismiss Appeal is approved and the appeal is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, September 11, 2020. /s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Presiding Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

2
EXHIBIT 10.7


 


May __, 2003


 


MSDW Capital Partners IV, Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

Attention: Leigh Abramson

Fax: (212) 761-9628


 


Dear Sirs:


 


Reference is made to the
acquisition (the “Investment”) by
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Capital Partners IV, L.P., Morgan Stanley Dean
Witter Capital Investors IV, L.P. and MSDW IV 892 Investors, L.P. (the “MSDW Funds”) and certain co-investors of
all the outstanding interests in Williams Bio-Energy, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (“WBE”), the parent
of Williams Ethanol Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“WESI”).


 


In consideration of the
time, effort and expense that has been and will be expended or incurred by or
on behalf of the MSDW Funds in connection with the Investment, WESI hereby agrees
to reimburse the MSDW Funds from time to time upon request for all reasonable
out-of-pocket costs, fees and expenses incurred by or on behalf of the MSDW
Funds in connection with or related to the Investment, whether incurred before
or after the date hereof, including: (i) accountants, attorneys,
recruitment firms and other consultants hired by the MSDW Funds, to the extent
not otherwise paid by WESI, (ii) performance of due diligence
investigations by the MSDW Funds or any such external consultants, (iii) the
preparation, negotiation and execution of any agreements between the MSDW Funds
and WESI, WBE or any of its subsidiaries, their senior executives and/or any
other shareholders of WESI or WBE relating to the Investment, (iv) any
subsequent amendments or waivers (whether or not the same become effective)
under or in respect of any such agreements, (v) governmental and
regulatory filings made by or on behalf of the MSDW Funds in connection with
the Investment, (vi) on-going matters affecting WESI such as equity
incentive plans, acquisitions or financing transactions, and (vii) the
MSDW Funds’ ongoing monitoring of the affairs of WESI (including all reasonable
travel and related expenses and ongoing industry and company analyses).


 


This agreement may be signed
in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the
same effect as if the signature hereto and thereto were upon the same
instrument. This agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the law of the State of New York.


 

















 


	
   

  	
  Very truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  WILLIAMS ETHANOL SERVICES, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:  Ron Miller

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:    President

  



 


Agreed
and acknowledged.


 


MSDW CAPITAL PARTNERS IV,
INC.,

in its capacity as managing member of

the general partner of the Funds


 


 


	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  
	
   

  	
  Title:
§ 1546.409 Integrity of screener tests. ( a ) *Cheating or other unauthorized conduct.* ( 1 ) Except as authorized by TSA, no person may— ( i ) Copy or intentionally remove a test under this part;
( ii ) Give to another or receive from another any part or copy of that test;
( iii ) Give help on that test to or receive help on that test from any person during the period that the test is being given; or
( iv ) Use any material or aid during the period that the test is being given.
( 2 ) No person may take any part of that test on behalf of another person.
( 3 ) No person may cause, assist, or participate intentionally in any act prohibited by this paragraph (a).
( b ) *Administering and monitoring screener tests.* ( 1 ) Each foreign air carrier must notify TSA of the time and location at which it will administer each screener readiness test required under § 1544.405 (d).
( 2 ) Either TSA or the foreign air carrier must administer and monitor the screener readiness test. Where more than one foreign air carrier or foreign air carrier uses a screening location, TSA may authorize an employee of one or more of the foreign air carriers or foreign air carriers to monitor the test for a trainee who will screen at that location.
( 3 ) If TSA or a representative of TSA is not available to administer and monitor a screener readiness test, the foreign air carrier must provide a direct employee to administer and monitor the screener readiness test.
( 4 ) An foreign air carrier employee who administers and monitors a screener readiness test must not be an instructor, screener, screener-in-charge, checkpoint security supervisor, or other screening supervisor. The employee must be familiar with the procedures for administering and monitoring the test and must be capable of observing whether the trainee or others are engaging in cheating or other unauthorized conduct.
MICHAEL JENKINS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 3088

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed October 6, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Suwannee County

. Paul S. Bryan , Judge

.

Michael Jenkins, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

A FFIRMED.

ROWE, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ. CONCUR.
§ 256.15 Disbursement of financial assistance. ( a ) *Grant agreement.* After receipt, review, and approval of an application, the Administrator will enter into a grant agreement with an applicant for the Federal share of the total allowable project costs. The terms and conditions of payment of the Federal share shall be set forth in the grant agreement.
( b ) *Record retention.* Each recipient of financial assistance under this part shall keep such records as the Administrator shall prescribe, including records which fully disclose the amount and disposition by such recipient of the proceeds of such assistance, the total cost of the project or undertaking in connection with which such assistance was given or used, the amount of that portion of the cost of the project or undertaking supplied by other sources, and such other records as will facilitate an effective audit.
( c ) *Audit and examination.* Until the expiration of three years after the completion of the project or undertaking referred to in paragraph (b) of this section, the Administrator and the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, shall have access for the purpose of aduit and examination to any books, documents, papers, and records of such receipts which, in the opinion of the Administrator or the Comptroller General, may be related or pertinent to such financial assistance.
[40 FR 29080, July 10, 1975, as amended at 43 FR 21890, May 22, 1978]
Unassociated Document


    AMENDMENT
      

    TO

    THE
      LL&E DEFERRED COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT

    FOR
      SELECTED KEY EMPLOYEES

     

     

    The
      LL&E Deferred Compensation Arrangement for Selected Key Employees is
      amended, effective as of January 1, 2005, as follows:

    A
      new
      Section 8.5 is added to read as follows::

     

    “8.5
      Preservation
      of Grandfathering under IRC Section 409A.
      It is
      intended that the benefits under this Plan qualify under the grandfather
      provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
      and
      the regulations and guidance thereunder so that such benefits are not subject
      to
      said Section 409A. Anything in this Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, no
      amendment shall be made to this Plan that would cause the loss of such
      grandfather protection.”