alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People ex rel. Reynolds v. The Board of County Commissioners of Rio Grande et al.

Case Followed.

The doctrine announced in *The People ex rel. v. Rio Grande County, ante,*p. 229, is adhered to.

*Error to the District Court of Rio Gtrande County.*

Mr. E. F. Riohaedson, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Jesse Stephenson and Mr. Geo. P. Wilson, for defendants in error.

' Messrs. Doud & Fowlee, *amici curiae.*

Reed, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case the same legal questions are presented as in *243
      *People ex rel. Rollins v. The Board of County Commissioners, ante,*p. 229, decided at this term.

The facts are so slightly variant that no examination and review of them is necessary in this opinion. The conclusion in that case must control this, and requires that the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed.*
PETITION TO: SECRETARY THOMAS E. PEREZ, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Millions of Amedcans like me are counting on our 40l{k) plans and individual retirement accounts for a secure 

financial future - andwe've worked hard to build and grow our savings. These plans often involve complex 

financial decisions, so many ofus have to use investment professionals for guidance. Loopholes in the current 

law make it easy for some on Wall Str~et to.take advantage of hardworking Americans and line their own 

pockets with our retirement savings. Last year alone, hidden fees, unfair risk, and bad investment advice 

reduced Americans' retirement savings by as much as $17 billion. It's time to dose this loophole and ensure a 

high standard that holds anyone who gives financial advice genuinely accountable for helping us choose the best 

investments. As one of your constituents, I'm counting on you to vvork to close the loophole now. 

PL0155XXXA 4122536040 

Sincerely, 

Mr. Richar Willett 

Edison, NJ 08820-2536
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 40288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3626]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Commodity Futures Trading Commission


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, August 24, 2007.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-3626 Filed 7-20-07; 11:20 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA planar near-field scanning technique for bistatic radar cross section measurementsA progress report on the development of a bistatic radar cross section (RCS) measurement range is presented. A technique using one parabolic reflector and a planar scanning probe antenna is analyzed. The field pattern in the test zone is computed using a spatial array of signal sources. It achieved an illumination pattern with 1 dB amplitude and 15 degree phase ripple over the target zone. The required scan plane size is found to be proportional to the size of the desired test target. Scan plane probe sample spacing can be increased beyond the Nyquist lambda/2 limit permitting constant probe sample spacing over a range of frequencies.Document ID19910006881Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsTuhela-Reuning, S.*(Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH, United States)*Walton, E. K.*(Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1990Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-187794NAS 1.26:187794ESL-TR-723105-1Accession Number91N16194Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-1125Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910006881.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 177 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 177

  Supporting the National Railroad Hall of Fame, Inc., of Galesburg, 
  Illinois, in its endeavor to erect a monument known as the National 
                         Railroad Hall of Fame.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2001

 Mr. Evans (for himself, Mr. Clement, Mr. Phelps, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. 
 Filner, Ms. Kilpatrick, Mr. Frost, Mr. Rush, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, 
Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Blagojevich, and Mr. Lipinski) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Supporting the National Railroad Hall of Fame, Inc., of Galesburg, 
  Illinois, in its endeavor to erect a monument known as the National 
                         Railroad Hall of Fame.

Whereas Galesburg, Illinois, has been linked to the history of railroading since 
        1849 when the Peoria and Oquawka Railroad was organized;
Whereas the citizens of Galesburg supported a railroad to Chicago which was 
        chartered as the Central Military Tract Railroad in 1851;
Whereas upon completion of the Central Military Tract Railroad, the Northern 
        Cross Railroad joined the Central Military Tract Railroad at Galesburg;
Whereas in 1886 Galesburg secured the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway and 
        became one of the few places in the world served by 2 major railroads;
Whereas the National Railroad Hall of Fame, Inc., has been established in 
        Galesburg and chartered under the laws of the State of Illinois as a 
        not-for-profit corporation;
Whereas the objectives of the National Railroad Hall of Fame, Inc., include (1) 
        perpetuating the memory of leaders and innovators in the railroad 
        industry, (2) fostering, promoting, and encouraging a better 
        understanding of the origins and growth of railroads, especially in the 
        United States, and (3) establishing and maintaining a library and 
        collection of documents, reports and other items of value to contribute 
        to the education of all persons interested in railroading; and
Whereas the National Railroad Hall of Fame, Inc., is planning to erect a 
        monument known as the National Railroad Hall of Fame to honor the men 
        and women who actively participated in the founding and development of 
        the railroad industry in the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the National 
Railroad Hall of Fame, Inc., of Galesburg, Illinois, in its endeavor to 
erect a monument known as the National Railroad Hall of Fame.
                                 <all>
```
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0659.html[7/21/2015 8:09:51 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-4z0s

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0659

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: amy Ragland

General Comment

we have the right to plan for our retirement the way we want to. no American politician has the right to tell us

 how to plan or how to invest. this is our choice and our responsibility. the government should keep its nose out

 of other peoples business and how we do things when it comes to our own private life.

so in the nicest way possible....... BUT OUT !!!
#### § 236.790 Release, time.

A device used to prevent the operation of an operative unit until after the expiration of a predetermined time interval after the device has been actuated.
§ 37.191 Special provision for small mixed-service operators. ( a ) For purposes of this section, a small mixed-service operator is a small operator that provides both fixed-route and demand-responsive service and does not use more than 25 percent of its buses for fixed-route service.
( b ) An operator meeting the criteria of paragraph (a) of this section may conduct all its trips, including fixed-route trips, on an advance-reservation basis as provided for demand-responsive trips in § 37.189. Such an operator is not required to comply with the accessible bus acquisition/equivalent service obligations of § 37.183(b).
## NO. 12

- 1 4

- 00 132

- C V

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: §
RICHARD JAMES JOHNSON, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

RELATOR §

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Richard James Johnson seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the trial court to rule on his “motion to appeal.” We deny the petition

. Mandamus is available to correct a clear abuse of discretion when there is no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W

. 3d 124, 135

- 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). The relator has the burden of establishing both requirements for mandamus. In re
E. Tex. Med. Ctr. Athens , 154 S.W.3d 933, 935 (Tex. App.

– Tyler 2005, orig. proceeding). Thus, a party seeking mandamus relie f must generally bring forward all that is necessary to
establish the claim for relief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52 prescribes the contents of a petition in an original proceeding such as this one. See generally T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52. As applied here, this rule requires that a mandamus pe tition include a complete list of the parties and the names and addresses of all counsel, a table of contents, an index of authorities, a statement of the case, and a statement of jurisdic tion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.3(a)

- (e). Other requirements include a statement of the issues presented, a statement of facts, an appendix, a record, and a clear and concise argument for the contentions made with appropriate citations to authorities and to the appendix or record.
See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.3(f)

- (h), (k), 52.7(a). Johnson’s petition does not meet any of these requirements.2

Compliance with some of Rule 52’s requirements, such as a clear and concise argument and a record, is necessary to provide this court with adequate information to evaluate the relator’s request for relief. However, Johnson has failed to comply with these requirements and others that ensure the availability of adequate information to this court. Therefore, we are unable to evaluate the merits of his petition. Accordingly, we deny Johnson’s petition for writ of
mandamus. Opinion delivered May 30 , 2014. Pan el consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MAY 30 , 2014

NO. 12

- 1 4

- 00 132

- CV

RICHARD JAMES JOHNSO N ,

Relator

v. HON. MARK A. CALHOON
,

Respondent



### O RIGINAL 

### P ROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by RICHARD JAMES JOHNSON , who is the defendant in Cause No. 3

- 42090 , pending on
the docket of the 3r d Judicial District Court of Anderson County, Texas. Said petition for writ of
mandamus h aving been filed herein on May 22 , 201 4 , and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that a writ of mandamus should not issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of
mandamu s be, and the same is, hereby D ENIED

.

Brian Hoyle, Justice

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J

.
§ 238.751 Alerters. ( a ) An alerter shall be provided in the operating cab of each Tier III trainset, unless in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section the trainset operates in a territory where an alternate technology providing equivalent safety is installed, such as redundant automatic train control or redundant automatic train stop system.
( b ) Upon initiation of the alerter, the engineer must acknowledge the alerter within the time period and according to the parameters specified by the railroad, as approved by FRA, in order for train operations to remain under the full control of the engineer.
( c ) If the engineer does not acknowledge the alerter as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, at a minimum a retrievable full service brake application shall occur until the train has stopped, unless the crew intervenes as described in paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) To retrieve the full service brake application described in paragraph (c) of this section, the engineer must acknowledge the alerter and activate appropriate controls to issue a command for brake application as specified by the railroad and approved by FRA.
( e ) If an alternate technology to the alerter is used, the railroad shall conduct an analysis that confirms the ability of the technology to provide an equivalent level of safety. This analysis shall be approved by FRA.
§ 244.21 Compliance and Enforcement. ( a ) After the Surface Transportation Board has approved a transaction subject to this part, a railroad implementing a transaction subject to this part shall operate in accordance with the Safety Implementation Plan approved by FRA until the properties involved in the transaction are completely integrated into the form contemplated in the Surface Transportation Board's approval of the transaction.
( b ) FRA may exercise any or all of its enforcement remedies authorized by the Federal railroad safety laws if a railroad fails to comply with paragraph (a) of this section or to execute any measure contained in a Safety Implementation Plan approved by FRA.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 177 (Thursday, September 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 52379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4503]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Quality Workgroup 
Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 12th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Quality Workgroup in accordance with the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

DATES: October 3, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. [Eastern].

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a 
Federal building).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/quality/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup will continue its discussion 
on how health information technology can provide the data needed for 
the development of quality measures that are useful to patients and 
others in the health care industry, automate the measurement of 
reporting of a comprehensive current and future set of quality 
measures, and accelerate the use of clinical decision support that can 
improve performance on those quality measures.
    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional 
information, go to: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/quality/quality_instruct.html.

    Dated: September 7, 2007.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 07-4503 Filed 9-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
§ 299.405 Trainset interiors. ( a ) *Interior fittings.* Interior fittings of trainsets shall be— ( 1 ) Securely attached and designed to operate without failure under the conditions typically found in passenger rail equipment including expected mechanical vibrations, and shock.
( 2 ) To the extent possible, all interior fittings shall be recessed or flush mounted. Corners and/or sharp edges shall be either avoided or padded to mitigate the consequence of impact with such surfaces.
( b ) *Luggage stowage.* ( 1 ) Luggage stowage racks shall slope downward in the outboard direction at a minimum ratio of 1:8 with respect to a horizontal plane to provide lateral restraint for stowed articles.
( 2 ) Luggage stowage compartments shall provide longitudinal restraint for stowed articles.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________ 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v.

ONYX CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC

AND MICHAEL A. FARR, 

Defendants,

AND

ROY DIXON, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________ 

2013-1110

__________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Michigan in case no. 10-CV-11633, 

Judge Denise Page Hood. 

__________________________ 

ON MOTION

__________________________ 

Before NEWMAN, LOURIE and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Case: 13-1110 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 04/05/2013
SEC V. ONYX CAPITAL ADVISORS 2

O R D E R

The Securities and Exchange Commission moves for reconsideration of the court’s order transferring the appeal. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

Absent an objection from the appellant within 14 days

of the date of this order, the motion for reconsideration 

will be granted and the appeal will be transferred to the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. 

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

s26 

Case: 13-1110 Document: 9 Page: 2 Filed: 04/05/2013
From: Roy Burnette [mailto:rburnette@pathwayscil.org] 

Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 2:12 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: health plans

One consideration on health plans is to work them in a similar way as low income housing.  In

the case of housing a percentage of the person’s income is to be paid toward their housing.  

Their housing allowance is based upon their income compared to the poverty rate in their place

of residence.

Commentary:  When listening to some of the airbags on radio their complaints are seeing your

doctor and waiting periods if you have a state sponsored medical program.

Response:  When we go to the doctor in rural areas we are happy to see any doctor even though

we may have “our” doctor in the practice.  We get to their office when they open the doors at

eight and hope to be seen before they close for lunch, or be there when they open at one and

hope to be seen before they close at five.  Having an appointment with a specialist is a little

different... thirty to forty five minutes is a normal wait.  But an appointment to see your family

doctor is not much more than a ticket to get in the waiting room and read the old magazines.  

The most expensive medical care is going to the emergency room which we can save a lot of

dollars by getting that cost reduced. But you don’t have much choice with a sudden kidney

stone attack, you collapse in the heat,  have a stroke, heart attack, get hurt with equipment, fall,

or some other pain that comes on suddenly and dramatically. In these cases, hospitals and their

sub‐contractors and the insurance companies, need to have their agreements more clear about

prior authorizations so the client is not left holding the bag for services that were not

preauthorized in an emergency situation.

With any state supported service you are going to find those affected will have someone either

(a) put a loop hole in the legislation for their buddies (b) look for a loophole or dubious wording

which will essentially void the regulation.

There is an 85% satisfaction rate with the VA medical plan.  Perhaps a national model can be

similar to that model.

Roy Burnette
From: jafairly@comcast.net [mailto:jafairly@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:23 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Judith Fairly 

450 Stoneridge Trail 

Weatherford, TX 76087
-----Original Message----- 

From: scmac@efn.org [mailto:scmac@efn.org] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:59 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

S. credo MacWilliams 

2392 Van NEss 

Eugene, OR 97403