alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 22.31 Suspension or revocation of eligibility to participate. ( a ) DOT OSDBU may suspend or revoke the eligibility of a Participating Lender to participate in the STLP by giving written notice in accordance with the terms and conditions cited in the cooperative agreement. Such notice may be given because of a violation of DOT OSDBU regulations; a breach of any agreement with DOT OSDBU; a change of circumstance resulting in the Participating Lender's inability to meet operational requirements; or a failure to engage in prudent lending practices. A suspension or revocation will not invalidate a loan guarantee previously approved by DOT OSDBU, providing that the specific loan was handled in accordance with its guarantee agreement, the cooperative agreement and/or these regulations.
( b ) The written notice to suspend or revoke participation in the STLP will specify the corrective actions that the Participating Lender must take, as well as the time period allowed for cure, prior to DOT OSDBU considering a termination of the cooperative agreement.
-----Original Message----- 

From: PostDLPost@AOL.COM [mailto:PostDLPost@AOL.COM] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:52 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Dianne Post 

1826 E Willetta St 

Phoenix, AZ 85006
#### Wilson H. Sherman and others, Respondents, v. James W. Caldwell and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
        THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
        FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q
        AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
        STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                      0000705581
<NAME>                                     Digital Commerce International, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                               1
<CURRENCY>                                 U.S. Dollars

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                     144,984
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              159,883
<ALLOWANCES>                               3,000
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           703,575
<PP&E>                                     66,980
<DEPRECIATION>                             15,286
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1,064,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      659,697
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   1,983,371
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,579,068)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1,064,000
<SALES>                                    78,356
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           78,356
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,105,605
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,027,249)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,027,249)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,027,249)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (0.08)




</TABLE>
From: C:laine Kinder [mailto:elainek@stronoman.com] 

Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 4: 16 PM 

To: Talk to DOL 

Subject: Attn: DOL 

I support your concept of assigning fiduciary duty to every retirement plan advisor. I DO NOT want any encumbrances 

to reduce that advisor's ability ro provide me with fiduciary advice. I DO NOT want more paperwork. I WANT access to 

speaking with a person who knows me and my situation whenever I have that need. I DO NOT want to see increased 

prices associated with this because of unnecessary regulations and administrative burdens. 

I want. FREEDOM of CHOICE when it comes to my investments. I DO NOT want government restrictions to strip me of 

any possibilities. 

I DO NOT WANT REDUNDANT REGULATIONS - Especially those that hinder my path to financial freedom. 

Thank yo.u, 

Elaine l<inder 

1
Third Amendment to Development Agreement



 Exhibit 10.19 
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 
 This THIRD AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
(“Amendment”) is made as of February 2, 2006, by and between BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION (“BSC”), a Delaware corporation, and CORAUTUS GENETICS INC. (the “Company”), a Delaware
corporation (each a “Party,” and collectively, the “Parties”). 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Investment
Agreement, dated July 30, 2003, between BSC and Company (the “Investment Agreement”), BSC and Company agreed, subject to the conditions set forth therein, to enter into a Loan Agreement, an Investor Rights Agreement, a
Development Agreement (as amended, the “Development Agreement”), a Distribution Agreement and a Patent Sublicense Agreement; 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to such agreements, the Parties agreed to cooperate to develop products that use VEGF-2 for the treatment of diseases of the heart or peripheral vascular system; 
 WHEREAS, the Development Agreement requires the Company to use commercially reasonable efforts to complete Clinical Development of the Final
Product in accordance with an established schedule set forth in Section 2.03 of the Development Agreement; 
 WHEREAS, the
Parties previously have amended the Development Agreement to modify certain of the dates set forth in Section 2.03 of the Development Agreement in the form of that certain First Amendment to Development Agreement dated as of July 22, 2004
and that Second Amendment to Development Agreement dated as of June 27, 2005; 
 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to modify
further certain of the dates in the schedule set forth in Section 2.03 of the Development Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, capitalized
terms that are not defined in this Agreement shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Development Agreement. 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual representations, agreements and covenants set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties
desire to amend the Development Agreement as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 2.03 (b). Section 2.03 (b) of the Development Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

  

	 	“(b)	**; and” 

  

	 	2.	All provisions of the Development Agreement, except to the extent specifically amended as provided above, are hereby in all respects ratified and confirmed.


  

	 	3.	This Amendment may be signed in one or more counterparts, which when taken together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. 

  


	**	Confidential Treatment Requested 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their
respective officers thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	CORAUTUS GENETICS INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Richard E. Otto
		 	 
		 	 Richard E. Otto
 President and Chief Executive
Officer

	
	BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Lawrence C. Best
		 	 
		 	 Lawrence C. Best
 Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer
#### Oscar Hopkins, *Appellant v.*Harriet Scott, *Respondent.*

— Judgment affirmed, with costs.
|    Name             |  JurisdictionIn WhichOrganized |  Percentage VotingSecurities Owned ByImmediate Parent |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|  AmBase Corporation           |  Delaware                      |  N/A                                                  |
|  Carteret Bancorp, Inc.       |  Delaware                      |  100%                                                 |
|  Maiden Lane Associates, Ltd. |  Delaware                      |  100%                                                 |
|  SDG Financial Corp.          |  Delaware                      |  100%                                                 |
#### § 236.330 Locking dog of switch-and-lock movement.

Locking dog of switch-and-lock movement shall extend through lock rod one-half inch or more in either normal or reverse position.
From: Bruce Woodard [mailto:Bruce@bsiacts.com] 

Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 11:07 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Proposed Conflict of Interest Rule

Please be advised that as a financial planner with over 30 years of experience I feel that the 

proposed changes to the fiduciary rule would be unworkable for my business.

Sent from Windows Mail
once_ex103.htm


Exhibit 10.3


 




  





1











  






 


 




  





2











  






 


 




  





3











  






 


 




  





4











  






 


 




  





5











  






 


 




  





6











  






 


 




  





7











  






 


 




  





8











  






 


 


9
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 6/5/15 11:07 AM

Received: June 02, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8j76-bk31

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0301

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: April Wallace

Address: 

2908 Robinwood Lane

Northport, AL, 35476

Email: awallace@jpturner.com

Phone: 205-454-8731

General Comment

It may be wise to extend the comment period to further study and properly ascertain the 

potential impact of this rule on 

consumer choice, which is key to a healthy marketplace and sound economy.

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b16627&format=xml&showo... 6/5/2015
**Exhibit 31.4****CFO CERTIFICATIONS**I, Derek J. Kerr, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of America West Airlines, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: July 27, 2006       /s/ Derek J. Kerr     Name: Derek J. Kerr    Title:   Chief Financial Officer
#### Frederick Reck, Respondent, *v.*The Phœnix Insurance Company, Appellant.—

Order reversed, and additional bond for $500 required, cost of appeal and disbursements to abide event. Opinion by

Brady, J.
<Page>




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our report, dated January 24, 2002, included in this Form 10-K,
into (i) Cinergy Corp.'s previously filed Registration Statement Nos. 33-55267,
33-55713, 33-56089, 33-56091, 33-56093, 33-56095, 333-17531, 333-51484,
333-83461, 333-83467, 333-94281, 333-72898, 333-72900, 333-72902, 333-74086 and
333-81770; (ii) PSI Energy, Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statement Nos.
33-48612 and 33-57064; (iii) The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company's previously
filed Registration Statement Nos. 33-45116, 33-52335 and 33-58967; and (iv) The
Union Light, Heat and Power Company's previously filed Registration Statement
No. 33-40245.



                                                     Arthur Andersen LLP

Cincinnati, Ohio
February 27, 2002
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 901

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify the excise tax

on heavy truck tires.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 2001

Mr. WATKINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify

the excise tax on heavy truck tires.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SIMPLIFICATION OF EXCISE TAX ON HEAVY

4 TRUCK TIRES.

5 (a) TAX BASED ON TIRE LOAD CAPACITY NOT

6 WEIGHT.—Subsection (a) of section 4071 of the Internal

7 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to imposition of tax on

8 tires) is amended to read as follows:

9 ‘‘(a) IMPOSITION AND RATE OF TAX.—There is here10 by imposed on tires of the type used on highway vehicles,
2

•HR 901 IH

1 if wholly or in part made of rubber, sold by the manufac2 turer, producer, or importer a tax equal to 8 cents for

3 each 10 pounds of the tire load capacity in excess of 3500

4 pounds.’’

5 (b) TIRE LOAD CAPACITY.—Subsection (c) of section

6 4071 of such Code is amended to read as follows:

7 ‘‘(c) TIRE LOAD CAPACITY.—For purposes of this

8 chapter, tire load capacity is the maximum load rating la9 beled on the tire pursuant to 49 CFR 571.109 or 49 CFR

10 571.119. In the case of any tire that is marked for both

11 single and dual loads, the higher of the 2 shall be used

12 for purposes of this section.’’

13 (c) TIRES TO WHICH TAX APPLIES.—Subsection (b)

14 of section 4072 of such Code (defining tires of the type

15 used on highway vehicles) is amended by striking ‘‘tires

16 of a type’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘tires—

17 ‘‘(1) of the type used on—

18 ‘‘(A) motor vehicles which are highway ve19 hicles, or

20 ‘‘(B) vehicles of the type used in connec21 tion with motor vehicles which are highway ve22 hicles, and

23 ‘‘(2) marked for highway use pursuant to 49

24 CFR 571.109 or 49 CFR 571.119.’’
3

•HR 901 IH

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 this section shall take effect on January 1 of the first cal3 endar year which begins more than 30 days after the date

4 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### Almira Baker, *Appellant, v.*John L. Baker, *Respondent.*

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Barker, J.
# Map            Dominican Republic.
### Placeholder for the complete docket from the 2009 Final Rule Docket Number EPA ‐ HQ ‐ OAR ‐ 2008 ‐ 0496 available at http://www.regulations.gov/ #!docketDetail;dct=FR+PR +N+O+SR;rpp=10;po=0;D=EPA ‐ HQ ‐ OAR ‐ 2008 ‐ 0496
§ 235.6 Expedited application for approval of certain changes. ( a ) *Qualifying changes.* A railroad may seek approval under this section, instead of under §§ 235.5 and 235.9-235.20 of this chapter for the following changes: ( 1 ) Modification of a signal system consisting of the installation, relocation, or removal of one or more signals, interlocked switches, derails, movable-point frogs, or electric locks in an existing system directly associated with the implementation of positive train control pursuant to subpart I of part 236 of this chapter, if the modification does not include the discontinuance or decrease of limits of a signal or train control system.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Procedure of expedited application.* ( 1 ) To seek approval under this section, a railroad shall provide a notice and profile plan for the proposed modification to the FRA Regional Administrator having jurisdiction over the affected territory.
( 2 ) Simultaneously with its filing with the FRA Regional Administrator, the railroad shall serve, either by hard copy or electronically, a copy of the notice and profile plan to representatives of employees responsible for maintenance, inspection, and testing of the affected signal system under part 236 of this chapter, as well as representatives of employees responsible for operating trains or locomotives in the affected territory.
( 3 ) The railroad shall include in its submission to the FRA Regional Administrator a statement affirming that the railroad has complied with the requirements of paragraph (b)(2) of this section, together with a list of the names and addresses of the persons served.
( 4 ) In response to receipt of a notice and profile plan under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the Regional Administrator shall in writing deny or approve, in full or in part, and with or without conditions, the request for signal system modification. For any portion of the request that is denied, the Regional Administrator shall refer the issue to the Railroad Safety Board as an application to modify the signal system.
( 5 ) A railroad may rescind its application to the Regional Administrator and submit an application under §§ 235.5 and 235.9-235.20 of this chapter at any time prior to the decision of the Regional Administrator.
( c ) The resultant arrangement of any change under this section shall comply with part 236 of this chapter.
[79 FR 49715, Aug. 22, 2014]
#### Walter S. *Church, Respondent, v.*Anna E. Shultes, *Appellant.*

Motion for reargument denied; order modified so as to direct issue to be tried on eight days’ notice of trial. Restitution to be stayed for forty days, to enable issue to bo tried.
§ 213.17 Waivers. ( a ) Any owner of track to which this part applies, or other person subject to this part, may petition the Federal Railroad Administrator for a waiver from any or all requirements prescribed in this part. The filing of such a petition does not affect that person's responsibility for compliance with that requirement while the petition is being considered.
( b ) Each petition for a waiver under this section shall be filed in the manner and contain the information required by part 211 of this chapter.
( c ) If the Administrator finds that a waiver is in the public interest and is consistent with railroad safety, the Administrator may grant the exemption subject to any conditions the Administrator deems necessary. Where a waiver is granted, the Administrator publishes a notice containing the reasons for granting the waiver.
Page 1 ol'l 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

Docket: l.R$-2009-0008 

Rqucst for Information for Paul Wellstone and Pete Domeni~i Mental Health Parity and 

AdJi~tiun Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: IRS-20U'?~Of108-000.? 

Requ~t for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstunc and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity 

and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: T R S-2009-0008,3030 

Comment on FK Doc # E9-09629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Gary L Ames 

Addrcss: 

Bala Cynywd, PA, 

Submitter's Representative: Gary A mes 

Organization: AIrntFocus.com 

Govcrnmcnt Agcncy Type: Federal 

Government Agency: DOL 

General Comment 

The Departments of Labor. Hcalth and Hunan Services, and the Treasury are 

inviting public comments tlrougll a Rcquest for Informatio~~ (RFI) regarding issues 

under the Wellstone-Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 

2003. 

I'm a big fan of neurofeedback Sir ADHD. Othcrs will write of supportive evidence. 

I find it compelling as a scientist and practitiona. 

I want to contribute the notion that neumfeedback is a form of applied behavior 

analysis. ABA is a wcll acccpted form of treatment for behaviorior conditions. 

Neumfeedback meets all the requirements CI f an ABA approach.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0529.html[7/20/2015 8:14:57 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-81xl

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0529

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Randy Vandegrift

Address:

765 Morning Dew Lane

Maineville, OH, 45039

Email: rvandegrift@yahoo.com

Phone: 513-899-2291

General Comment

The government placed itself in my life by telling me I had to give it so much money out of every paycheck to

 fund a social program called social security. We were told it would be a very small amount, not subjected to

 taxes and would be there for everyone in the future. I had/have no say in how it is governed, and our Congress

 has spent the money instead of investing it as I would have done, and now leaves a trail of what in the future

 will be worthless IOU's. The money my wife and I did put back ourselves MUST NOT be placed in any manner

 at the discretion of this government that so ruthlessly taxes, spends and does not prepare for our future. LEAVE

 MY 401(K) and other savings alone; I have placed it in the hands of a very capable institution that is making me

 money instead of leaving me IOU's.