alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                          50,101
<SECURITIES>                                    17,595 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,759 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,155
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               153,972 
<PP&E>                                         123,214
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (89,663)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 202,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,384
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       125,914
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,716
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   202,451
<SALES>                                        101,043 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,981 
<CGS>                                           14,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,862
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                98,046
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,083
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,924
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,159
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,159
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        


</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00348-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.H. AND K.H.,

CHILDREN

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 322nd District Court

of Tarrant County (322-690431-20)

January 18, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s termination order. It is ordered that the trial court’s 

termination order is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
1210-AB32-2-1050.html[7/23/2015 3:20:32 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-d5mi

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1542

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Steven Beam

General Comment

Please stop this constant overreach. We (U.S. Citizens) are perfectly capable of planning our own retirement. WE

 don't want your "help". Leave my retirement plans alone.
#### § 29.706 Will retrocession adversely affect future funding available for the retroceded program?

Retrocession will not adversely affect future funding for the retroceded program. Future funding will be available to the Tribe at the same level of funding as if there had been no retrocession.
§ 179.220-11 Postweld heat treatment. ( a ) Postweld heat treatment of the inner container is not a specification requirement.
( b ) Postweld heat treatment of the cylindrical portions of the outer shell to which the anchorage or draft sills are attached must comply with AAR Specifications for Tank Cars, appendix W (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter).
( c ) When cold formed heads are used on the outer shell they must be heat treated before welding to shell if postweld heat treatment is not practicable due to assembly procedures.
[Amdt. 179-9, 36 FR 21341, Nov. 6, 1971, as amended at 68 FR 75762, Dec. 31, 2003]
#### Carman Smith, *Respondent, v.*Christopher Risley, *Appellant.*

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Bumgardner, Kelsey and Senior Judge Hodges

FLOYD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD AND VSBA WORKERS’ COMP GROUP/ ACORDIA EMPLOYERS SERVICE

v. Record No. 3020-03-3

RANDALL WOOLWINE MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM MARCH 16, 2004 RANDALL WOOLWINE

v. Record No. 3046-03-3

FLOYD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD AND VSBA WORKERS’ COMP GROUP/ ACORDIA EMPLOYERS SERVICE

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Ramesh Murthy; Lisa Frisina Clements; PennStuart, on briefs), for Floyd County School Board a nd VSBA Workers’ Comp Group/Acordia Employers Service. (Brenda C. Moses; Montgomery & Moses, PC, on brief), for Randall Woolwine in Record No. 3020-03-3. (Randall W. Woolwine, pro se , on brief), in Record No. 3046-03-3.

Floyd County School Board and its insurer (herei nafter referred to as “employer”) appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that Randall Woolwine’s (claimant) current medical condition and treatm ent are related to his compensable March 6, 2002 injury by accident and that Drs. Glen L. Sublette and Kevin Kelleher are authorized treating physicians and that any referrals made by those p hysicians for treatment that is causally related

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opini on is not designated for publication.- 2 - to the March 6, 2002 injury by accident, are the em ployer’s responsibility. In his cross-appeal, Woolwine appeals the commission’ s findings that he failed to pr ove he was totally disabled beginning December 12, 2002 and that even if he pr oved he was partially disabled as of that date, he failed to prove he made a reasonable effort to market his remaining work capacity. We

have reviewed the record and the commissi on’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stat ed by the commission in its final opinion. See Woolwine v. Floyd (County of) School Board , VWC File No. 209-02-00 (Oct. 23, 2003). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm with respect to the issues raised in both appeals because the facts and legal contentions ar e adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not ai d the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule

5A:27. 1

Affirmed.

1 We deny employer’s Motion to Dismiss Reco rd Number 3046-03-3 as claimant’s brief was timely filed. In addition, we deny claima nt’s request to expedite this case.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 179 (Monday, September 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 52952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4459]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11012 and <greek-i>11013]


OHIO Disaster Number OH-00012

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of OHIO (FEMA-1720-DR), dated 08/27/2007.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, and Tornadoes
    Incident Period: 08/20/2007 through 08/28/2007

EFFECTIVE DATE: 09/04/2007
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/26/2007.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/27/2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of OHIO, dated 08/27/2007 is hereby amended 
to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Hardin, Seneca.
Contiguous Counties:
    Ohio: Logan, Sandusky, Union.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008).
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 07-4459 Filed 9-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,743,000
<SECURITIES>                                 3,652,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,416,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   114,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,523,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,008,000
<PP&E>                                       5,081,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,669,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,420,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,716,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,694,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,420,000
<SALES>                                     28,319,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,319,000
<CGS>                                       13,780,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,644,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,098,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,439,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,659,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,659,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7237

WAYNE DOUGLAS LENEAU, Plaintiff – Appellant,

v. J. BENJAMIN APLIN, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services, Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (4:09-cv-00932-CMC)

Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 27, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Douglas Leneau, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Wayne Douglas Leneau appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Leneau v. Aplin , No. 4:09-cv-00932-CMC (D.S.C. June 22, 2009). Further, we deny Leneau’s motion for transcripts and copies at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 383.72 Implied consent to alcohol testing.

Any person who holds a CLP or CDL or is required to hold a CLP or CDL is considered to have consented to such testing as is required by any State or jurisdiction in the enforcement of item (4) of Table 1 to § 383.51 of this subpart and § 392.5(a)(2) of this subchapter. Consent is implied by driving a commercial motor vehicle.

[80 FR 59072, Oct. 1, 2015]
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-17448

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 0:15-cr-60317-BB-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DIANA LOVERA,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(July 28, 2017)

Before MARCUS, JILL PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal 

waiver in Lovera’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 

997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced 

Case: 16-17448 Date Filed: 07/28/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Bascomb, 451 F.3d 

1292, 1297 (11th Cir. 2006) (appeal waiver “cannot be vitiated or altered by 

comments the court makes during sentencing”); United States v. Grinard-Henry, 

399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes 

waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant 

error).

Case: 16-17448 Date Filed: 07/28/2017 Page: 2 of 2
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0961.html[7/21/2015 6:50:41 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-1hh6

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0961

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jay Piva

General Comment

After seeing how our government has handled social security, I sure don't want them dictating who I use my

 private retirement money.
§ 38.37 Stop request. ( a ) Where passengers may board or alight at multiple stops at their option, vehicles in excess of 22 feet in length shall provide controls adjacent to the securement location for requesting stops and which alerts the driver that a mobility aid user wishes to disembark. Such a system shall provide auditory and visual indications that the request has been made.
( b ) Controls required by paragraph (a) of this section shall be mounted no higher than 48 inches and no lower than 15 inches above the floor, shall be operable with one hand and shall not require tight grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist. The force required to activate controls shall be no greater than 5 lbf (22.2 N).
§ 32.230 How and when must I identify workplaces? ( a ) You must identify all known workplaces under each DOT award. A failure to do so is a violation of your drug-free workplace requirements. You may identify the workplaces— ( 1 ) To the DOT official that is making the award, either at the time of application or upon award; or
( 2 ) In documents that you keep on file in your offices during the performance of the award, in which case you must make the information available for inspection upon request by DOT officials or their designated representatives.
( b ) Your workplace identification for an award must include the actual address of buildings (or parts of buildings) or other sites where work under the award takes place. Categorical descriptions may be used (*e.g.,* all vehicles of a mass transit authority or State highway department while in operation, State employees in each local unemployment office, performers in concert halls or radio studios).
( c ) If you identified workplaces to the DOT awarding official at the time of application or award, as described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and any workplace that you identified changes during the performance of the award, you must inform the DOT awarding official.
Unassociated Document


    AMENDMENT
      NO. 4

    TO

    BURLINGTON
      RESOURCES INC.

    1993
      STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

     

     

    The
      Burlington Resources Inc. 1993 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby
      amended, effective as of January 1, 2005, as follows:

    A
      new
      Section 3.5 is added to the Plan to read as follows:

     

    “3.5
      Anything
      in this Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, the Plan Administrator and the
      Board of Directors shall neither have nor exercise any authority under this
      Plan
      to modify outstanding options, stock appreciation rights or Restricted Stock
      so
      as to cause any such options, stock appreciation rights or Restricted Stock
      to
      provide for a deferral of compensation subject to Section 409A of the
      Code.”
§ 238.717 Truck-to-carbody attachment. To demonstrate the integrity of truck-to-carbody attachments, each unit in a Tier III trainset shall: ( a ) Comply with the requirements in § 238.219; or
( b ) Have a truck-to-carbody attachment with strength sufficient to resist, without yielding, the following individually applied, quasi-static loads on the mass of the truck at its CG: ( 1 ) 3g vertically downward;
( 2 ) 1g laterally, along with the resulting vertical reaction to this load; and
( 3 ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, 5g longitudinally, along with the resulting vertical reaction to this load, provided that for the conditions in the dynamic collision scenario described in § 238.705(a): ( i ) The average longitudinal deceleration at the CG of the equipment during the impact does not exceed 5g; and
( ii ) The peak longitudinal deceleration of the truck during the impact does not exceed 10g.
( c ) As an alternative to demonstrating compliance with paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the truck shall be shown to remain attached after a dynamic impact under the conditions in the collision scenario described in § 238.705(a).
( d ) For purposes of paragraph (b) of this section, the mass of the truck includes axles, wheels, bearings, truck-mounted brake system, suspension system components, and any other component attached to the truck by design.
( e ) Truck attachment shall be demonstrated using a validated model.
From: Kermit Iverson [mailto:KIverson@NorthstarBank.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 11:13 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210 - AB32

Re: DOL Fiduciary Rule

I urge you to extend the analysis period to 120 days or longer to fully comprehend any changes 

legislation is looking at for the financial industry. Changes can be good, oversight is welcome but lets 

not be destructive in our oversight, I fear there will be more harm than good if 12b-1 fees are done 

away with, more disclosure? Yes but not elimination.

Kermit Iverson

Investment Executive

North Star Bank - "Your Financial Partner"

phone: 651.487.4412 fax: 651.497.4422

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 

privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the 

sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of -- ) 

) 

ECC-RMA, LLC ) 

) 

) 

Under Contract No. W912PL-10-D-0037 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 59990, 59993, 59995 

59997,60151 

Richard B. Oliver, Esq. 

J. Matthew Carter, Esq. 

Brian P. Cruz, Esq. 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 

Los Angeles, CA 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

John F. Bazan, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorney 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles 

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE PEACOCK 

It is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the parties' 

stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a consent judgment, 

the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of $816,265. This amount is 

inclusive of interest. No further interest shall be paid. 

Dated: 16 March 2016 

I concur 

~c /---2 d;J. MARK~EMPL~~ Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

ROBERT T. PEACOCK 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I concur 

l~--- 1~- \ 

~il S~CKLEFORD Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 59990, 59993, 59995, 

59997, 60151, Appeals ofECC-RMA, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's 

Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 182 (Thursday, September 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 53754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4684]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 2 p.m., Thursday, October 4, 2007.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Rule Enforcement Review.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-4684 Filed 9-18-07; 10:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
§ 272.1 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to promote the safety of railroad operations and the health and safety of railroad employees, especially those who are directly involved in a critical incident by requiring that the employing railroad offers and provides appropriate support services, including appropriate relief, to the directly-involved employees following that critical incident.
( b ) Nothing in this part constrains a railroad from implementing a critical incident stress plan that contains additional provisions beyond those specified in this part (including provisions covering additional incidents or persons), provided that such additional provisions are not inconsistent with this part.