### 30939 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 100 / Thursday, May 23, 2013 / Notices

Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2); 29 CFR Part 1912a; 41 CFR Part 102– 3; and Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 1– 2012 (77 FR 3912 (1/25/2012)).

Signed at Washington, DC, on May 17,
2013. David Michaels, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2013–12277 Filed 5–22–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4510–26–P**

**OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY** 

**Appointment of Members of Senior Executive Services Performance**  **Review Board**

**AGENCY :**  Office of National Drug Control Policy [ONDCP].

**ACTION :**  Notice of appointments.

**SUMMARY :**  The following persons have been appointed to the ONDCP Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board: Mr. Jeffrey Teitz, Dr. Terry Zobeck, Ms. Martha Gagne, and Mr. Gerard Burns.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Please direct any questions to Daniel R. Petersen, Deputy General Counsel (202) 395–6745, Office of National Drug Control Policy, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC 20503.

Daniel R. Petersen, Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013–12248 Filed 5–22–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3180–02–P**

**NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES** 

**Notice of Proposed Information Collection Requests: State Library**  **Administrative Agencies Survey, FY 2014** 

**AGENCY :**  Institute of Museum and Library Services, The National Foundation for the Arts and the Humanities.

**ACTION :**  Notice, request for comments, collection of information.

**SUMMARY :**  The Institute of Museum and Library Service (‘‘IMLS’’) as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperworkand respondent burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ). This pre-clearance consultation program helps to ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. The purpose of this Notice is to solicit comments concerning the continuance of the State Library Administrative Agencies Survey for FY 2014.

A copy of the proposed information collection request can be obtained by contacting the individual listed below in the **ADDRESSES** section of this notice.

**DATES :**  Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the

**ADDRESSES** section below on or before July 22, 2013.

The IMLS is particularly interested in comments which:

• Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;

• Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;

• Enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and

• Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submissions of responses.

**ADDRESSES :**  For a copy of the documents contact: Deanne W. Swan, Senior Statistician, Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Institute of Museum and Library Services, 1800 M Street NW., 9th Floor, Washington, DC 20036. Dr. Swan can be reached by Telephone: 202–653–4769, Fax: 202– 653–4601, or by email at dswan@imls.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  I. Background

The Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) is an independent Federal grant-making agency and is the primary source of federal support for the Nation’s 123,000 libraries and 17,500 museums. IMLS provides a variety of grant programs to assist the Nation’s museums and libraries in improving their operations and enhancing their services to the public. IMLS is responsible for identifying national needs for and trends in museum, library, and information services; measuring and reporting on the impact and effectiveness of museum, library and information services throughout the United States, including programs conducted with funds made available by IMLS; identifying, and disseminating information on, the best practices of such programs; and developing plans to improve museum, library and information services of the United States and strengthen national, State, local, regional, and international communications and cooperative networks (20 U.S.C. Chapter 72, 20 U.S.C. 9108).

II. Current Actions

The State Library Administrative Agencies Survey has been conducted by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the clearance number 3137–0072, which expires 10/31/2013. State library administrative agencies (‘‘SLAAs’’) are the official agencies of each state charged by state law with the extension and development of public library services throughout the state. (20 U.S.C. Chapter 72, 20 U.S.C. 9122.) The purpose of this survey is to provide state and federal policymakers with information about SLAAs, including their governance, allied operations, developmental services to libraries and library systems, support of electronic information networks and resources, number and types of outlets, and direct services to the public. Through the FY 2010 collection, the SLAA Survey was conducted annually; beginning with the FY 2012 collection, the survey will be conducted biennially. Before the beginning of the FY 2014 collection, IMLS will review and revise the questionnaire. Because the FY 2014 collection will not begin until late 2014, we are carrying over the documentation and estimated burden associated with the FY 2012 data.

Agency: Institute of Museum and Library Services.

Title: State Library Administrative Agencies Survey, FY 2014.

OMB Number: 3137–0072. Agency Number: 3137. Affected Public: Federal, State and local governments, State library administrative agencies, libraries, general public.

Number of Respondents: 51. Frequency: Biennially. Burden hours per respondent: 24. Total burden hours: 1,248. Total Annual Costs: $34,307. Contact: Kim A. Miller, Management Analyst, Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Institute of Museum and Library Services, 1800 M Street


### 30940 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 100 / Thursday, May 23, 2013 / Notices

1 Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Express Mail Contract 15 to Competitive Product List and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of Unredacted Governors’ Decision, Contract, and Supporting Data, May 15, 2013 (Request). NW., 9th Floor, Washington, DC 20036. Ms. Miller can be reached by Telephone: 202–653–4762, Fax: 202– 653–4601, or by email at kmiller@imls.gov.

Dated: May 20, 2013. Kim A. Miller, Management Analyst, Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 2013–12269 Filed 5–22–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 7036–01–P**

**NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION**

**Proposal Review; Notice of Meetings**

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92– 463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals as part of the selection process for awards. The review and evaluation may also include assessment of the progress of awarded proposals. The majority of these meetings will take place at NSF, 4201 Wilson, Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230.

These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

These closed proposal review meetings will not be announced on an individual basis in the Federal Register

. NSF intends to publish a notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of the closed proposal review meetings that include the names of the proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF Web site: http://www.nsf.gov/events/ This information may also be requested by telephoning, 703/292–8182.

Dated: May 20, 2013. Susanne Bolton, Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–12279 Filed 5–22–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 7555–01–P POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION** 

**[Docket Nos. MC2013–50 and CP2013–63; Order No. 1719]** 

**New Postal Product**

**AGENCY :**  Postal Regulatory Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Commission is noticing a recent Postal Service filing concerning the addition of Express Mail Contract 15 to the competitive product list. This notice informs the public of the filing, invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps.

**DATES :**  Comments are due: May 23,
2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit comments electronically via the Commission’s Filing Online system at http://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments electronically should contact the person identified in the **FOR FURTHER**
**INFORMATION CONTACT** section by telephone for advice on filing alternatives.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
at 202–789–6820.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Table of Contents

I. Introduction II. Notice of Filings III. Ordering Paragraphs

I. Introduction

In accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq., the Postal Service filed a formal request and associated supporting information to add Express Mail Contract 15 to the competitive product list. 1 The Postal Service asserts that Express Mail Contract 15 is a competitive product ‘‘not of general applicability’’ within the meaning of 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Id. at 1. The Request has been assigned Docket No. MC2013–50.

The Postal Service contemporaneously filed a redacted contract related to the proposed new product under 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39 CFR 3015.5. Id. Attachment B. The instant contract has been assigned Docket No. CP2013–63.

Request. To support its Request, the Postal Service filed six attachments as follows:

• Attachment A—a redacted copy of Governors’ Decision No. 11–6, authorizing the new product; • Attachment B—a redacted copy of the contract;

• Attachment C—proposed changes to the Mail Classification Schedule competitive product list with the addition underlined;

• Attachment D—a Statement of Supporting Justification as required by 39 CFR 3020.32;

• Attachment E—a certification of compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a); and

• Attachment F—an application for non-public treatment of materials to maintain redacted portions of the contract and related financial information under seal.

In the Statement of Supporting Justification, Dennis R. Nicoski, Manager, Field Sales Strategy and Contracts, asserts that the contract will cover its attributable costs, make a positive contribution to covering institutional costs, and increase contribution toward the requisite 5.5 percent of the Postal Service’s total institutional costs. Id. Attachment D at 1. Mr. Nicoski contends that there will be no issue of market dominant products subsidizing competitive products as a result of this contract. Id.

Related contract. The Postal Service included a redacted version of the related contract with the Request. Id. Attachment B. The contract is scheduled to become effective one business day following the day that the Commission issues all necessary regulatory approval. Id. at 3. The contract will expire 3 years from the effective date unless, among other things, either party terminates the agreement upon 30 days’ written notice to the other party. Id. The Postal Service represents that the contract is consistent with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a). Id. Attachment E. The Postal Service filed much of the supporting materials, including the related contract, under seal. Id. Attachment F. It maintains that the redacted portions of the Governors’ Decision, contract, customer-identifying information, and related financial information, should remain confidential. Id. at 3. This information includes the price structure, underlying costs and assumptions, pricing formulas, information relevant to the customer’s mailing profile, and cost coverage projections. Id. The Postal Service asks the Commission to protect customer-identifying information from public disclosure indefinitely. Id. at 7. II. Notice of Filings

The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2013–50 and CP2013–63 to consider the Request pertaining to the proposed Express Mail Contract 15