UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

                   For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003


[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-11935


                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX
        (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                              94-2887133
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

<PAGE>

                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                                 March 31, 2003

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Assets
<S>                                                                         <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                $ 2,252
   Receivables and deposits                                                     695
   Restricted escrows                                                            45
   Other assets                                                                 601
   Investment properties:
      Land                                                   $ 11,635
      Buildings and related personal property                  92,078
                                                              103,713
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (56,883)       46,830
                                                                           $ 50,423
Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 189
   Tenant security deposits payable                                             314
   Accrued property taxes                                                       535
   Due to affiliates                                                          2,101
   Other liabilities                                                          1,534
   Due to former affiliate                                                      364
   Mortgage notes payable                                                    56,051

Partners' Deficit
   General partner                                           $ (9,896)
   Limited partners (89,292 units issued and
      outstanding)                                               (769)      (10,665)
                                                                           $ 50,423



            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)


                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                               March 31,
                                                        2003               2002
Revenues:
   Rental income                                       $ 3,422           $ 4,081
   Other income                                            335               350
      Total revenues                                     3,757             4,431

Expenses:
   Operating                                             1,685             1,376
   General and administrative                              119               140
   Depreciation                                            913               897
   Interest                                              1,178             1,060
   Property tax                                            356               347
      Total expenses                                     4,251             3,820

Net (loss) income                                      $ (494)            $ 611

Net (loss) income allocated to general partner          $ (58)             $ 72
Net (loss) income allocated to limited partners           (436)              539
                                                       $ (494)            $ 611

Net (loss) income per limited partnership unit         $ (4.88)           $ 6.04

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


<PAGE>



                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                   CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' DEFICIT
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                     Limited
                                    Partnership    General      Limited
                                       Units       Partner      Partners       Total

<S>                                    <C>           <C>        <C>          <C>
Original capital contributions         89,292        $ --       $ 89,292     $ 89,292

Partners' deficit
   at December 31, 2002               89,292       $(9,838)      $ (333)     $(10,171)

Net loss for the three months
   ended March 31, 2003                   --           (58)        (436)         (494)

Partners' deficit
   at March 31, 2003                  89,292       $(9,896)      $ (769)     $(10,665)

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                       March 31,
                                                                   2003        2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                              <C>          <C>
  Net (loss) income                                              $ (494)      $ 611
  Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash
   provided by operating activities:
      Depreciation                                                  913          897
      Amortization of loan costs and discount                        20           22
      Change in accounts:
       Receivables and deposits                                     569          287
       Other assets                                                (148)        (211)
       Accounts payable                                            (167)        (101)
       Tenant security deposits payable                              28          (20)
       Accrued property taxes                                      (241)        (109)
       Other liabilities                                            297          (70)
         Net cash provided by operating activities                  777        1,306

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (308)        (372)
  Net withdrawals from restricted escrows                            --          157
         Net cash used in investing activities                     (308)        (215)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payment on mortgage notes payable                                (242)        (260)
  Advances from affiliates                                        2,101           --
  Payoff of mortgage note payable                                (2,101)          --
         Net cash used in financing activities                     (242)        (260)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents                           227          831
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                  2,025        1,645
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                      $ 2,252      $ 2,476

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                        $ 1,133      $ 1,071

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The  accompanying   unaudited   consolidated  financial  statements  of  Century
Properties Fund XIX (the  "Partnership" or  "Registrant")  have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial statements. The general partner of the Partnership is Fox Partners II,
a California  general  partnership.  The general partners of Fox Partners II are
Fox Capital Management Corporation ("FCMC" or the "Managing General Partner"), a
California  corporation,  Fox Realty  Investors  ("FRI"),  a California  general
partnership, and Fox Partners 83, a California general partnership. The Managing
General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment  Investment and Management  Company
("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. In the opinion of the
Managing  General  Partner,  all  adjustments  (consisting  of normal  recurring
accruals)  considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.
Operating  results  for the three  month  period  ended  March 31,  2003 are not
necessarily  indicative  of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year
ending  December 31, 2003. For further  information,  refer to the  consolidated
financial  statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.

Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The  Partnership  has no employees  and is  dependent  on the  Managing  General
Partner  and  its  affiliates  for  the  management  and  administration  of all
Partnership  activities.  The  Partnership  Agreement  provides  for (i) certain
payments to affiliates for services and (ii)  reimbursement  of certain expenses
incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

During  the three  months  ended  March 31,  2003 and  2002,  affiliates  of the
Managing  General Partner were entitled to receive 5% of gross receipts from all
of  the  Partnership's   properties  as  compensation  for  providing   property
management  services.  The  Partnership  paid to such  affiliates  approximately
$188,000  and  $228,000  for the three  months  ended  March 31,  2003 and 2002,
respectively, which is included in operating expenses.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  received   reimbursement  of
accountable  administrative  expenses  amounting  to  approximately  $50,000 and
$48,000 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively,
which is included in general and administrative expenses.

Pursuant  to  the  Partnership  Agreement,  for  managing  the  affairs  of  the
Partnership, the general partner is entitled to receive a Partnership management
fee  equal  to  10%  of the  Partnership's  adjusted  cash  from  operations  as
distributed. No fees were earned during the three months ended March 31, 2003 or
2002 because there were no distributions from operations.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  has  made  available  to the
Partnership  a  credit  line  of  up to  $150,000  per  property  owned  by  the
Partnership.  During the three months ended March 31, 2003, the Managing General
Partner  exceeded this credit limit and advanced the  Partnership  approximately
$2,101,000. This was was used to repay the second mortgage encumbering McMillian
Place Apartments,  which was part of the loan extension  agreement.  Interest on
the credit  line is charged at the prime rate plus 2%.  Other than cash and cash
equivalents,  the line of  credit is the  Partnership's  only  unused  source of
liquidity.

The  Partnership  insures its properties up to certain  limits through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the AIMCO limits through
insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers  unaffiliated  with the
Managing  General  Partner.  During 2003 and 2002,  the  Partnership's  cost for
insurance  coverage  and  fees  associated  with  policy  claims  administration
provided  by  AIMCO  and its  affiliates  will  be  approximately  $217,000  and
$263,000, respectively.

Note C - Extension of Mortgage Note Payable

The first and second  mortgage loans for McMillian Place  Apartments  matured in
October 2002 and were in default at December 31,  2002.  On March 25, 2003,  the
Managing  General  Partner and the lender agreed to an eleven month extension of
the  terms  of the  mortgage.  As part of the  agreement,  an  affiliate  of the
Managing General Partner advanced approximately $2,101,000 to the Partnership to
repay the second mortgage loans. Pursuant to the agreement,  the stated interest
rate is 6.5%  from  the  previous  maturity  date and the loan  will  mature  on
September  30, 2003.  The Managing  General  Partner is currently  marketing the
property for sale.

Note D - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purports  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class  of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  which are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities which were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged  into AIMCO.  The  plaintiffs  seek  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking  dismissal
of the action.  In lieu of responding  to the motion,  the  plaintiffs  filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order  sustaining  defendants'  demurrer on certain  grounds.  On July 20, 2001,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001,
Plaintiffs  filed a fourth amended class and  derivative  action  complaint.  On
September 12, 2001, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.  On
October 5, 2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated  defendants filed a
demurrer to the fourth amended complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001.
On February 2, 2002,  the Court served its order  granting in part the demurrer.
The  Court has  dismissed  without  leave to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'
claims.  On February 11, 2002,  plaintiffs  filed a motion  seeking to certify a
putative  class  comprised of all  non-affiliated  persons who own or have owned
units  in  the  partnerships.   The  Managing  General  Partner  and  affiliated
defendants  oppose the motion.  On April 29,  2002,  the Court held a hearing on
plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took the matter under submission
after further  briefing,  as ordered by the court, was submitted by the parties.
On July 10, 2002,  the Court entered an order vacating the trial date of January
13, 2003 (as well as the pre-trial and discovery  cut-off  dates) and stayed the
case in its entirety  through November 7, 2002 so that the parties could have an
opportunity  to discuss  settlement.  On October 30, 2002,  the court entered an
order extending the stay in effect through January 10, 2003.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action  described below. On April
4, 2003, the Court preliminarily approved the settlement and scheduled a hearing
on final approval for June 2, 2003.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the Managing General Partner has also agreed to make
a tender offer to purchase all of the partnership  interests in the Partnerships
within one year of final  approval,  if it is granted,  and to provide  partners
with the  independent  appraisals  at the time of these  tenders.  The  proposed
settlement  also provides for the  limitation  of the allowable  costs which the
Managing  General  Partner or its  affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships  in
connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class counsel fees and
costs in this litigation.  On April 11, 2003,  notice was distributed to limited
partners providing the details of the proposed settlement.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the Managing  General  Partner and affiliated
defendants  moved to strike the first  amended  complaint  in its  entirety  for
violating  the Court's July 10, 2001 order  granting in part and denying in part
defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes action, or alternatively,  to strike certain
portions of the complaint based on the statute of limitations.  Other defendants
in the action  demurred to the fourth  amended  complaint,  and,  alternatively,
moved to strike the complaint. On December 11, 2001, the court heard argument on
the motions  and took the matters  under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the
Court  served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the
Heller complaint as a violation of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes action.
On March 27, 2002,  the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking
the  complaint.  Before  completing  briefing on the appeal,  the parties stayed
further proceedings in the appeal pending the Court's review of the terms of the
proposed settlement described above.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

<PAGE>

ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  The discussions of the  Registrant's
business  and  results  of  operations,   including  forward-looking  statements
pertaining to such matters,  do not take into account the effects of any changes
to the  Registrant's  business  and results of  operations.  Actual  results may
differ  materially  from those described in the  forward-looking  statements and
will  be  affected  by  a  variety  of  risks  and  factors  including,  without
limitation:  national and local economic  conditions;  the terms of governmental
regulations that affect the Registrant and interpretations of those regulations;
the competitive  environment in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks,
including the risk that cash flows from  operations may be  insufficient to meet
required  payments of  principal  and  interest;  real estate  risks,  including
variations  of real  estate  values and the  general  economic  climate in local
markets and competition for tenants in such markets; and possible  environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment  properties consist of eight apartment  complexes.
The following  table sets forth the average  occupancy of the properties for the
three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002:

                                                   Average Occupancy
      Property                                      2003       2002

      Sunrunner Apartments                          93%        93%
         St. Petersburg, Florida
      Misty Woods Apartments                        89%        89%
         Charlotte, North Carolina
      McMillan Place Apartments (1)                 87%        95%
         Dallas, Texas
      Vinings Peak Apartments (1)                   86%        91%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Wood Lake Apartments                          90%        90%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Plantation Crossing (2)                       93%        88%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Greenspoint Apartments (1)                    91%        99%
         Phoenix, Arizona
      Sandspoint Apartments (3)                     78%        94%
         Phoenix, Arizona

   (1)      The Managing General Partner attributes the decrease in occupancy at
            these  properties to a slow economy,  job layoffs and increased home
            purchases due to favorable interest rates.

   (2)      The Managing General Partner attributes the increase in occupancy at
            Plantation Crossing to marketing efforts in the local market.

   (3)      The Managing General Partner attributes the decrease in occupancy at
            Sandspoint  Apartments  to a slow  economy,  unemployment  and  home
            purchases.

Results of Operations

The  Partnership  realized a net loss of  approximately  $494,000  for the three
month  period ended March 31, 2003 as compared to net income of $611,000 for the
three  month  period  ended  March  31,  2002.  The  decrease  in net  income is
attributable  to a decrease in total revenue and an increase in total  expenses.
The decrease in total  revenues is due to a decrease in rental  revenue.  Rental
revenue  decreased  due to a decrease in occupancy at five of the  Partnership's
rental properties,  a decrease in average rental rate at seven of the properties
and an increase in rental concessions at six of the properties.

Total  expenses  increased due to increases in operating  and interest  expense.
Operating  expense  increased due to an increase in advertising  and maintenance
expenses.  Advertising  expenses  increased due to an increase in referral fees,
internet  advertising  and periodicals at most of the  Partnership's  investment
properties. Maintenance expenses increased due to an increase in contract labor,
floor covering  repairs and payroll  related costs at the  properties.  Interest
expense  increased  due  to  the  increased   interest  rate  on  the  mortgages
encumbering McMillan Place Apartments.

Included in general and  administrative  expense at both March 31, 2003 and 2002
are management  reimbursements to the Managing General Partner allowed under the
Partnership  Agreement.  In addition,  costs  associated  with the quarterly and
annual  communications  with  investors and  regulatory  agencies and the annual
audit required by the Partnership Agreement are also included.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the Managing General
Partner monitors the rental market  environment of its investment  properties to
assess the feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy
levels and protecting  the  Partnership  from increases in expenses.  As part of
this plan, the Managing General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from
the burden of  inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and
maintaining a high overall  occupancy  level.  However,  due to changing  market
conditions,  which  can  result  in the use of  rental  concessions  and  rental
reductions to offset softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the
Managing General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  March  31,  2003,  the  Partnership   had  cash  and  cash   equivalents  of
approximately  $2,252,000 as compared to  approximately  $2,476,000 at March 31,
2002.  For the three  months  ended March 31,  2003,  cash and cash  equivalents
increased  approximately  $227,000  from  the  Partnership's  year  end  due  to
approximately  $308,000  and $242,000 of cash used in  investing  and  financing
activities,  respectively,  offset by approximately $777,000 of cash provided by
operating  activities.  Net  cash  used in  investing  activities  consisted  of
property  improvements and replacements.  Net cash used in financing  activities
consisted of the repayment of the second  mortgage  encumbering  McMillian Place
Apartments and principal payments on the mortgages encumbering the Partnership's
investment  properties,  partially  offset by advances  from an affiliate of the
Managing General Partner.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures  required at the investment  properties to adequately  maintain the
physical  assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with
Federal,  state,  and local  legal and  regulatory  requirements.  The  Managing
General  Partner  monitors  developments  in the  area of legal  and  regulatory
compliance and is studying new federal laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests additional  compliance
measures with regard to governance,  disclosure, audit and other areas. In light
of these changes,  the  Partnership  expects that it will incur higher  expenses
related  to  compliance,  including  increased  legal  and audit  fees.  Capital
improvements planned for the Partnership's properties are detailed below.

Sunrunner Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2003,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately   $21,000  of  capital   improvements  at  Sunrunner   Apartments,
consisting primarily of structural enhancements and floor covering replacements.
These  improvements  were  funded  from  operating  cash flow.  The  Partnership
evaluates  the capital  improvement  needs of the  property  during the year and
currently  expects to complete an  additional  $156,000 in capital  improvements
during the remainder of 2003. The additional  capital  improvements will consist
primarily  of parking lot  improvements,  appliances,  air  conditioning  units,
resurfacing,  and floor covering  replacements.  Additional capital improvements
may be considered  and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as
well as the anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Misty Woods Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2003,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $10,000  of  capital  improvements  at  Misty  Woods  Apartments,
consisting  primarily of floor covering  replacements.  These  improvements were
funded  from  operating  cash  flow.  The  Partnership   evaluates  the  capital
improvement  needs of the  property  during  the year and  currently  expects to
complete an additional $151,000 in capital  improvements during the remainder of
2003.  The  additional  capital  improvements  will  consist  primarily of floor
covering  replacements,  air conditioning units, pool upgrades,  and appliances.
Additional  capital  improvements  may be  considered  and  will  depend  on the
physical  condition  of the  property  as  well  as the  anticipated  cash  flow
generated by the property.

McMillian Place Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2003,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $62,000 of capital  improvements at McMillian  Place  Apartments,
consisting primarily of structural enhancements and floor covering replacements.
These  improvements  were  funded  from  operating  cash flow.  The  Partnership
evaluates  the capital  improvement  needs of the  property  during the year and
currently  expects to complete an  additional  $393,000 in capital  improvements
during the remainder of 2003. The additional  capital  improvements will consist
primarily of structural  improvements,  appliances,  perimeter fencing and floor
covering  replacements.  Additional  capital  improvements may be considered and
will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as the anticipated
cash flow generated by the property.

Vinings Peak Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2003,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $45,000  of capital  improvements  at  Vinings  Peak  Apartments,
consisting primarily of plumbing upgrades and fixtures, structural enhancements,
and  floor  covering   replacements.   The  Partnership  evaluates  the  capital
improvement  needs of the  property  during  the year and  currently  expects to
complete an additional $32,000 in capital  improvements  during the remainder of
2003.  The  additional  capital  improvements  will  consist  primarily of floor
covering replacements,  structural enhancements,  pool upgrades, and appliances.
Additional  capital  improvements  may be  considered  and  will  depend  on the
physical  condition  of the  property  as  well  as the  anticipated  cash  flow
generated by the property.

Wood Lake Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2003,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately   $43,000  of  capital   improvements  at  Wood  Lake  Apartments,
consisting primarily of floor covering replacements, resurfacing and maintenance
equipment.  These  improvements  were  funded  from  operating  cash  flow.  The
Partnership  evaluates the capital  improvement needs of the property during the
year and  currently  expects  to  complete  an  additional  $170,000  in capital
improvements  during the remainder of 2003. The additional capital  improvements
will consist  primarily of flooring,  cabinet,  counter top,  appliance and HVAC
replacements.  Additional capital improvements may be considered and will depend
on the physical  condition of the property as well as the anticipated  cash flow
generated by the property.

Plantation Crossing Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2003,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately $25,000 of capital improvements at Plantation Crossing Apartments,
consisting  primarily  of  floor  covering  and  appliance  replacement.   These
improvements were funded from operating cash flow. The Partnership evaluates the
capital  improvement needs of the property during the year and currently expects
to complete an additional $13,000 in capital  improvements  during the remainder
of 2003. The additional capital improvements will consist primarily of flooring,
appliance  and  HVAC  replacements.   Additional  capital  improvements  may  be
considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as well as
the anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Greenspoint Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2003,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $32,000  of  capital  improvements  at  Greenspoint   Apartments,
consisting primarily of parking area improvements,  floor covering and appliance
replacements.  These  improvements  were funded from  operating  cash flow.  The
Partnership  evaluates the capital  improvement needs of the property during the
year and  currently  expects  to  complete  an  additional  $220,000  in capital
improvements  during the remainder of 2003. The additional capital  improvements
will  consist  primarily  of  land   improvements,   parking  lot  enhancements,
appliance,  floor covering and HVAC replacements and plumbing and electrical and
plumbing  enhancements.  Additional  capital  improvements may be considered and
will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as the anticipated
cash flow generated by the property.

Sands Point Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2003,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $70,000  of  capital  improvements  at  Sands  Point  Apartments,
consisting  primarily of plumbing  enhancements,  floor  covering and  appliance
replacements,  and plumbing  fixtures.  The  Partnership  evaluates  the capital
improvement  needs of the  property  during  the year and  currently  expects to
complete an additional $646,000 in capital  improvements during the remainder of
2003.  The  additional  capital  improvements  will  consist  primarily  of roof
replacements,   structural   enhancements,   land  improvements,   plumbing  and
electrical  enhancements  and floor covering and HVAC  replacements.  Additional
capital improvements may be considered and will depend on the physical condition
of the property as well as the anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

The additional  capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available
from operations or from Partnership  reserves.  To the extent that such budgeted
capital improvements are completed,  the Partnership's  distributable cash flow,
if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The first and second  mortgage loans for McMillian Place  Apartments  matured in
October 2002 and were in default at December 31,  2002.  On March 25, 2003,  the
Managing  General  Partner and the lender agreed to an eleven month extension of
the  terms  of the  mortgage.  As part of the  agreement,  an  affiliate  of the
Managing General Partner advanced approximately $2,101,000 to the Partnership to
repay the second mortgage loans. Pursuant to the agreement,  the stated interest
rate is 6.5%  from  the  previous  maturity  date and the loan  will  mature  on
September 30, 2003.

The  Partnership's  assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term  needs
(exclusive  of  capital   improvements)   of  the   Partnership.   The  mortgage
indebtedness of approximately  $56,051,000,  net of discount,  is amortized over
varying periods with required  balloon  payments  ranging from September 2003 to
September  2021.  The Managing  General  Partner will attempt to refinance  such
indebtedness  and/or sell the properties  prior to such maturity  dates.  If the
properties cannot be refinanced or sold for a sufficient amount, the Partnership
will risk losing such properties through foreclosure.

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement,  the term of the Partnership is scheduled
to expire on December 31, 2007. Accordingly,  prior to such date the Partnership
will need to either  sell its  investment  properties  or extend the term of the
Partnership.

No distributions were made during the three months ended March 31, 2003 or 2002.

Future cash  distributions  will depend on the levels of net cash generated from
operations, the availability of cash reserves and the timing of debt maturities,
refinancings,  and/or  property  sales.  The  Partnership's  cash  available for
distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. There can be no assurance, however,
that the  Partnership  will  generate  sufficient  funds from  operations  after
required capital expenditures to permit distributions to its partners in 2003 or
subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 52,098.66 limited partnership units
in the Partnership  representing  58.35% of the  outstanding  units at March 31,
2003. A number of these units were  acquired  pursuant to tender  offers made by
AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its  affiliates  will
acquire additional units of limited  partnership  interest in the Partnership in
exchange  for  cash  or a  combination  of  cash  and  units  in  the  operating
partnership of AIMCO either through  private  purchases or tender offers.  Under
the  Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders  holding a  majority  of the units are
entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters which would include
voting on certain  amendments to the Partnership  Agreement and voting to remove
the  Managing  General  Partner.  As a result of its  ownership of 58.35% of the
outstanding units, AIMCO is in a position to influence all such voting decisions
with  respect to the  Registrant.  Although the  Managing  General  Partner owes
fiduciary  duties to the  limited  partners  of the  Partnership,  the  Managing
General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.  As
a result,  the duties of the  Managing  General  Partner,  as  managing  general
partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with
the duties of the Managing  General Partner to AIMCO,  as its sole  stockholder.
However, IPLP, an affiliate of the Managing General Partner, is required to vote
25,228.66 of its Units:  (i) against any proposal to increase the fees and other
compensation  payable by the Partnership to the Managing General Partner and any
of  its  affiliates;  and  (ii)  on all  other  matters  submitted  by it or its
affiliates,  in  proportion  to the votes cast by non  tendering  unit  holders.
Except for the foregoing,  no other limitations are imposed on IPLP's or AIMCO's
right to vote its Units.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The financial  statements are prepared in accordance with accounting  principles
generally  accepted in the United States which require the  Partnership  to make
estimates and  assumptions.  The  Partnership  believes that of its  significant
accounting  policies,  the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and
complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The investment  properties are recorded at cost, less accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying amount of the property may be impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
properties.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's   investment  property.  These  factors  include  changes  in  the
national,  regional and local economic  climate;  local  conditions,  such as an
oversupply  of  multifamily   properties;   competition   from  other  available
multifamily  property  owners and changes in market  rental  rates.  Any adverse
changes in these factors could cause an impairment in the Partnership's assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
Rental income  attributable to leases is recognized  monthly as it is earned and
the Partnership  fully reserves all balances  outstanding  over thirty days. The
Partnership will offer rental concessions during  particularly slow months or in
response  to  heavy  competition  from  other  similar  complexes  in the  area.
Concessions are charged to income as incurred.

ITEM 3.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The principal  executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing
General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive
officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  have, within 90 days of
the filing date of this quarterly  report,  evaluated the  effectiveness  of the
Partnership's  disclosure  controls and  procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c)) and have determined that such disclosure controls
and  procedures  are  adequate.  There have been no  significant  changes in the
Partnership's  internal  controls or in other  factors that could  significantly
affect the  Partnership's  internal  controls since the date of evaluation.  The
Partnership does not believe any significant  deficiencies or material  weakness
exist in the Partnership's internal controls. Accordingly, no corrective actions
have been taken.



<PAGE>


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purports  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class  of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  which are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities which were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged  into AIMCO.  The  plaintiffs  seek  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking  dismissal
of the action.  In lieu of responding  to the motion,  the  plaintiffs  filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order  sustaining  defendants'  demurrer on certain  grounds.  On July 20, 2001,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001,
Plaintiffs  filed a fourth amended class and  derivative  action  complaint.  On
September 12, 2001, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.  On
October 5, 2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated  defendants filed a
demurrer to the fourth amended complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001.
On February 2, 2002,  the Court served its order  granting in part the demurrer.
The  Court has  dismissed  without  leave to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'
claims.  On February 11, 2002,  plaintiffs  filed a motion  seeking to certify a
putative  class  comprised of all  non-affiliated  persons who own or have owned
units  in  the  partnerships.   The  Managing  General  Partner  and  affiliated
defendants  oppose the motion.  On April 29,  2002,  the Court held a hearing on
plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took the matter under submission
after further  briefing,  as ordered by the court, was submitted by the parties.
On July 10, 2002,  the Court entered an order vacating the trial date of January
13, 2003 (as well as the pre-trial and discovery  cut-off  dates) and stayed the
case in its entirety  through November 7, 2002 so that the parties could have an
opportunity  to discuss  settlement.  On October 30, 2002,  the court entered an
order extending the stay in effect through January 10, 2003.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action  described below. On April
4, 2003, the Court preliminarily approved the settlement and scheduled a hearing
on final approval for June 2, 2003.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the Managing General Partner has also agreed to make
a tender offer to purchase all of the partnership  interests in the Partnerships
within one year of final  approval,  if it is granted,  and to provide  partners
with the  independent  appraisals  at the time of these  tenders.  The  proposed
settlement  also provides for the  limitation  of the allowable  costs which the
Managing  General  Partner or its  affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships  in
connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class counsel fees and
costs in this litigation.  On April 11, 2003,  notice was distributed to limited
partners providing the details of the proposed settlement.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the Managing  General  Partner and affiliated
defendants  moved to strike the first  amended  complaint  in its  entirety  for
violating  the Court's July 10, 2001 order  granting in part and denying in part
defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes action, or alternatively,  to strike certain
portions of the complaint based on the statute of limitations.  Other defendants
in the action  demurred to the fourth  amended  complaint,  and,  alternatively,
moved to strike the complaint. On December 11, 2001, the court heard argument on
the motions  and took the matters  under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the
Court  served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the
Heller complaint as a violation of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes action.
On March 27, 2002,  the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking
the  complaint.  Before  completing  briefing on the appeal,  the parties stayed
further proceedings in the appeal pending the Court's review of the terms of the
proposed settlement described above.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a)    Exhibits:

                  Exhibit 3, Agreement of Limited  Partnership,  incorporated by
                  reference to Exhibit A to the  Prospectus  of the  Partnership
                  dated  September 20, 1983, as amended on June 13, 1989, and as
                  thereafter   supplemented,   contained  in  the   Registrant's
                  Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Reg. No. 2-79007).

                  Exhibit 99, Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                  as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
                  of 2002.

            b)    Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended March 31, 2003.



<PAGE>


In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX


                                    By:   FOX PARTNERS II
                                          Its General Partner


                                    By:   FOX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
                                          Its Managing General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Chief Accounting Officer


                                    Date: May 14, 2003



<PAGE>



                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Patrick J. Foye, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Century  Properties
Fund XIX;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


      a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
      material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,   including   its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;


      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing  date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c)  Presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
      effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


      a) All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process,  summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


      b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
      controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:  May 14, 2003

                                    /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Patrick J. Foye
                                    Executive  Vice  President  of  Fox  Capital
                                    Management  Corporation,  equivalent  of the
                                    chief executive officer of the Partnership


<PAGE>



                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Paul J. McAuliffe, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Century  Properties
Fund XIX;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


      a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
      material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,   including   its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;


      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing  date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c)  Presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
      effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


      a) All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process,  summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


      b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
      controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:  May 14, 2003

                                  /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                                  Officer of Fox Capital Management Corporation,
                                  equivalent of the chief financial officer of
                                  the Partnership



<PAGE>


Exhibit 99


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Century  Properties
Fund XIX (the  "Partnership"),  for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  Patrick J. Foye, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of
the Partnership, and Paul J. McAuliffe, as the equivalent of the chief financial
officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Name:  Patrick J. Foye
                                    Date:  May 14, 2003


                                           /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Name:  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Date:  May 14, 2003


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the  Partnership for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.