alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 271.101 Risk reduction programs. ( a ) *Program required.* Each railroad shall establish and fully implement an RRP meeting the requirements of this part. An RRP shall systematically evaluate railroad safety hazards on a railroad's system and manage the resulting risks to reduce the number and rates of railroad accidents/incidents, injuries, and fatalities. An RRP is an ongoing program that supports continuous safety improvement. A railroad shall design its RRP so that it promotes and supports a positive safety culture at the railroad. An RRP shall include the following: ( 1 ) A risk-based hazard management program, as described in § 271.103;
( 2 ) A safety performance evaluation component, as described in § 271.105;
( 3 ) A safety outreach component, as described in § 271.107;
( 4 ) A technology analysis and technology implementation plan, as described in § 271.109;
( 5 ) RRP implementation and support training, as described in § 271.111;
( 6 ) Involvement of railroad employees in the establishment and implementation of an RRP, as described in § 271.113; and
( 7 ) An FRMP as described in § 271.607.
( b ) *RRP plans.* A railroad's RRP shall be supported by an FRA-approved RRP plan meeting the requirements of subpart C of this part.
( c ) *Host railroads and system safety programs.* ( 1 ) If a railroad subject to this part (RRP railroad) hosts passenger train service for a railroad subject to the system safety program requirements in part 270 of this title (system safety program (SSP) railroad), the RRP railroad shall communicate with the SSP railroad to coordinate the portions of the system safety program applicable to the RRP railroad hosting the passenger train service.
( 2 ) The RRP railroad shall incorporate its communication and coordination with the SSP railroad into its own RRP.
( d ) *Persons that perform or utilize significant safety-related services.* Under § 271.205(a)(3), a railroad's RRP plan shall identify persons that enter into a contractual relationship with the railroad to either perform significant safety-related services on the railroad's behalf or to utilize significant safety-related services provided by the railroad for railroad operations purposes. For example, a railroad's RRP plan shall identify entities such as host railroads, contract operators, shared track/corridor operators, or other contractors utilizing or performing significant safety-related services. A railroad shall identify such persons even if the persons are not required to comply with this part (*e.g.,* a railroad shall identify a tourist railroad that operates over the railroad's track even though the tourist railroad is exempt from this rule under § 271.3(b)(2)). A railroad shall ensure persons performing or utilizing significant safety-related services support and participate in its RRP.
[85 FR 9314, Feb. 18, 2020, as amended at 87 FR 35673, June 13, 2022]
#### § 382.209 Use following an accident.

No driver required to take a post-accident alcohol test under § 382.303 shall use alcohol for eight hours following the accident, or until he/she undergoes a post-accident alcohol test, whichever occurs first.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 174 (Monday, September 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 51583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4414]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee and the 
Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee 
and the Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on Wednesday, 
September 26, 2007 at the Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests 
Headquarters office, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, WA. This meeting will 
begin at 9:30 a.m. and continue until 3:30 p.m. During this meeting 
Provincial Advisory Committee members will share information on new 
developments relating to the Northwest Forest Plan, receive an update 
on the Travel Management Plan, the Recreation Site Facilities Master 
Plan, the Tripod Fire salvage process, and learn about a conservation 
community wilderness proposal. All Eastern Washington Cascades and 
Yakima Province Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Paul Hart, Designated Federal Official, USDA, Wenatchee 
National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington 98801, 509-664-
9200.

    Dated: September 5, 2007.
Paul Hart,
Designated Federal Official, Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests.
[FR Doc. 07-4414 Filed 9-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyf-n160

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2179

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

This is a very bad idea. I understand the intention is to "protect" consumers retirement accounts 

but the IRA/401K is not intended to be the structure for a safety net. We already have that in the 

social security system. It is well established how the IRA/401K works and there are many 

existing products which help manage risk that is appropriate for retirement age. I see no 

consumer demand for the government to change this system.
§ 235.5 Changes requiring filing of application. ( a ) Except as provided in § 235.7, applications shall be filed to cover the following: ( 1 ) The discontinuance of a block signal system, interlocking, traffic control system, automatic train stop, train control, or cab signal system or other similar appliance or device;
( 2 ) The decrease of the limits of a block signal system, interlocking, traffic control system, automatic train stop, train control, or cab signal system; or
( 3 ) The modification of a block signal system, interlocking, traffic control system, automatic train stop, train control, or cab signal system.
( b ) [Reserved]
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2130-0042)
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 904 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 904

                     For the relief of Paul Green.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2001

  Mr. Frank introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                     For the relief of Paul Green.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING APPLICATION FOR CHILD'S 
              INSURANCE BENEFIT AND LUMP-SUM DEATH BENEFIT UNDER TITLE 
              II OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT.

    If an application for a child's insurance benefit under section 
202(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 402(d)) is filed by or on 
behalf of Paul Green of Walnut Street in Newton, Massachusetts, during 
the 1 year period following the date of the enactment of this Act--
            (1) the application shall be deemed, for purposes of 
        section 202(d) of such Act, to have been filed during the month 
        in which his mother, Marie Pendola Grardina (social security 
        account number 019-16-2579), died; and
            (2) the application shall be deemed to be an application 
        for a lump-sum death benefit under section 202(i) of such Act 
        (42 U.S.C. 402(i)), and for purposes of such section 202(i), to 
        have been filed in the month during which his mother, Marie 
        Pendola Grardina, died.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RAUL ROMERO MATOS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 119 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2018, the Motion for Leave to File Amicus 

Curiae Brief is GRANTED, and the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, treated as a Petition 

for Review, is DENIED.
Exhibit 10.505

Non-Employee Director

CHIRON CORPORATION.  June 27, 2002

Dear
Non-Employee Director Automatic Share Rights Holder:

I
am pleased to inform you that the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Chiron Corporation (the "Company") recently approved an amendment to each of your outstanding
automatic share rights listed onExhibit A(the "Share Rights") to provide you with greater protection in the event of a certain corporate
transactions.

The
amendment is set forth in detail below. In general terms, the amendment provides that your Share Rights will immediately vest upon a Qualifying Termination of your services to the
Company that occurs within twenty-four (24) months after a Change in Control. (See below for definitions.)

Accordingly,
the automatic share rights letter agreement (the "Agreement) documenting your Share Rights is hereby amended to read as follows:

Qualifying Termination Following a Change in Control



---



Except
for the foregoing change of the Agreement applicable to your Share Rights, no other terms or conditions of your Share Rights have been modified as a result of the amendment, and
those other terms and conditions will continue in full force and effect. Please attach a copy of this letter agreement to your original Agreement so that you will have a complete record of all the
terms applicable to your Share Rights.

The
amendment was effective as of February 16, 2001. We hope that you find this amendment a valuable addition to your equity package. Should you have any questions concerning the
amendment, please direct them to Claudia Belcher at (510) 923-2907.

| |  | Very truly yours, 
| |  | ------------------
| |  | Chiron Corporation
| |  | By:               
| |  |                   
| |  | Title:            
| |  |                   

2

---

EXHIBIT A

|Name |  | Date of Grant |  | Exercise Price Per
Share |  | Total Number of Option
Shares Granted |  | Total Number of
Option Shares
Outstanding
|---- |  | ------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|     |  |               |  |                          |  |                                       |  |                                          
|     |  |               |  |                          |  |                                       |  |                                          

3

---

QuickLinks
#### § 236.775 Movement, switch-and-lock.

A device, the complete operation of which performs the three functions of unlocking, operating and locking a switch, movable-point frog or derail.
#### Philip Ebaling and another, *Respondents, v.*Paul Bauer, *Appellant.*

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Daniels, J., and Davis, P. J.
Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Henry County
Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David H. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David H. GillDavid H. Gill, President and CEO(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Thomas L. ReddingThomas L. Redding, Sr. Vice President and CFO(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


Date: May 8, 2007
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2379

To amend the Small Business Act to modify requirements relating to the

personal net worth of individuals who may be considered economically

disadvantaged for the purpose of receiving contract awards under section

8(a) of that Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 21, 1995

Mr. MCHALE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Small Business

A BILL

To amend the Small Business Act to modify requirements

relating to the personal net worth of individuals who

may be considered economically disadvantaged for the

purpose of receiving contract awards under section 8(a)

of that Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Minority Business De5 velopment Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 2379 IH

1 SEC. 2. ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED INDIVIDUALS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8(a)(6) of the Small Busi3 ness Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)(6)) is amended by adding at

4 the end the following:

5 ‘‘(F) The Administration shall not prohibit the owner

6 of a small business concern from qualifying as an economi7 cally disadvantaged individual for the purpose of participa8 tion in the program established under this subsection sole9 ly on the basis of the personal net worth of the owner

10 unless such personal net worth, as computed pursuant to

11 subparagraph (E), exceeds $350,000.’’.

12 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Administrator of the Small

13 Business Administration shall modify regulations issued

14 pursuant to section 8(a) of the Small Business Act to

15 carry out the amendment made by subsection (a) of this

16 section.

Æ
§ 240.219 Denial of certification. ( a ) A railroad shall notify a candidate for certification or recertification of information known to the railroad that forms the basis for denying the person certification and provide the person a reasonable opportunity to explain or rebut that adverse information in writing prior to denying certification. A railroad shall provide the locomotive engineer candidate with any written documents or records, including written statements, related to failure to meet a requirement of this part that support its pending denial decision.
( b ) This section does not require further opportunity to comment if the railroad's denial is based solely on factors addressed by §§ 240.115, 240.117, and 240.119 and the opportunity to comment afforded by those sections has been provided.
( c ) If a railroad denies a person certification or recertification, it shall notify the person of the adverse decision and explain, in writing, the basis for its denial decision. The basis for a railroad's denial decision shall address any explanation or rebuttal information that the locomotive engineer candidate may have provided in writing pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section. The document explaining the basis for the denial shall be served on the person within 10 days after the railroad's decision and shall give the date of the decision.
( d ) A railroad shall not deny the person's certification for failing to comply with a railroad operating rule or practice that constitutes a violation under § 240.117(e)(1) through (5) if sufficient evidence exists to establish that an intervening cause prevented or materially impaired the engineer's ability to comply with that railroad operating rule or practice.
[56 FR 28254, June 19, 1991, as amended at 85 FR 81315, Dec. 15, 2020]
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 833 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 833

To amend title 39, United States Code, to prevent certain types of mail 
 matter from being sent by a Member of the House of Representatives as 
                        part of a mass mailing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2001

  Mr. LaHood introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 
 Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 39, United States Code, to prevent certain types of mail 
 matter from being sent by a Member of the House of Representatives as 
                        part of a mass mailing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTRICTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 3210(a) of title 39, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(8) A Member of the House of Representatives may not send, as 
part of a mass mailing, any matter described in subparagraph (B), (C), 
or (F) of paragraph (3).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to mail sent during any session of Congress 
beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
exv10w14



 






EXHIBIT 10.14




ARRANGEMENTS WITH NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS




     Set forth below are arrangements between ABM Industries Incorporated (the “Registrant”) and
various of its directors that are not set forth in a formal written document.



     On October 18, 2004, the Governance Committee of the Board of Directors of the Registrant
approved the compensation of non-employee directors for its fiscal year beginning November 1, 2004.
Non-employee directors receive an annual retainer of $36,000, and meeting fees of $2,000 for
in-person Board and Committee meetings, $2,000 for telephonic meetings of two or more hours, and
$1,000 for telephonic meetings of less than two hours. In addition, the Chair of the Audit
Committee receives an additional fee of 100% of the applicable meeting fee for each Audit Committee
meeting and each of the Chairs of the other Committees (Governance Committee, Compensation
Committee, and Executive Committee) receives an additional fee of 50% of the applicable meeting fee
for each meeting of his or her respective Committee. The fees to the Committee Chairs took effect
November 1, 2004, except for the Chair of the Executive Committee, which took effect January 1,
2005. These arrangements remain in effect.



     Chairman of the Board Martinn Mandles, whose employment ended on November 1, 2004, receives an
additional annual retainer of $36,000. In addition, the Registrant paid Mr. Mandles $50,000 in
fiscal year 2005 for certain transition services, which fee continues on a pro-rata basis through
January 31, 2006.



     As a result of the expected reduced frequency of meetings of the Executive Committee on a
going forward basis, effective January 1, 2005, Registrant made a lump sum retirement payment of
$300,000 to Chairman of the Executive Committee William Steele and terminated the annual consulting
retainer of $100,000 paid to Mr. Steele. The Registrant paid an annual fee of $100,000 to director
Theodore Rosenberg in 2005, which fee continues on a pro-rata basis through January 31, 2006.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 1:41 PM

Received: July 14, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jz9-zh46

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2264

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Ron Edwards

General Comment

How much more does this Administration want? This is beyond asinine; it's Tyrannical!
From: bsanders@westga.edu [mailto:bsanders@westga.edu] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 6:25 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Robert Sanders 

103 Villa rosa Ridge 

Temple, GA 30179
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0246 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629 

Submitter Information 

Name: James r. evans 

Address: 

183 morning lake drive 

moore, SC, 29369 

Email: eva3289257@charter.net 

Phone: 864-595-9038 

General Comment 

This is in regard to an RFI regarding issues under the Wellstone-Domenici Mental 

Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008. 

I am a clinical psychologist affiliated with a group of mental health practitioners 

who use neurofeedback (aka EEG biofeedback) treatment especially for ADHD 

and anxiety disorders, and as an aid in recovery of function following traumatic 

brain injury.This is an empirically validated, cost-effective non-medication 

approach to ttreatment for the above disorders, as well as certain other mental 

health-related disorders. Its use has expanded greatly within the last ten years, 

and practitioners now are found in over thirty countries. Scientific and clinical 

evidence for its efficacy is strong, yet coverage generally is still rejected by larger 

insurance companies. This is true, despite the fact that many routine medical and 

surgical procedures which are covered have less empirical support based on 

controlled efficacy research. I believe this is an unwarranted limitation on a 

valuable treatment for many mental health probems.I also believe this is in 

violation of the intent of the parity statute, and trust that new regulations will 

correct this situation. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 28, 2009 

Received: May 28, 2009 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 809bc4d2 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web