alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0106 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629 

Submitter Information 

Address: 

MA, 

General Comment 

The current regulations under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health 

Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 do not assure parity for mental health 

coverage. 

I have had personal experience being treated with EEG biofeedback or 

neurofeedback to help with a traumatic brain injury. But these services are not 

currently covered by Anthem blue Cross Blue Shield, my health insurer, even 

though there is research showing that neurofeedback is effective. 

After very limited or no success with other treatments, including being 

misdiagnosed with mental illnesses, I decided to try neurofeedback. I have had 

multiple sessions of neurofeedback. This treatment has been extremely helpful. I 

am no longer unable to sleep, can focus on my work, no more mood swings and the 

priceless ability to get my life back. Most importantly, I no longer suffer from 

the frustration that goes along with medical professionals that often try to 

treat symptoms without knowing the cause of the problems. 

Because there is good research to show that neurofeedback works, and because I 

have seen for myself that it helped when other treatments failed, I believe it 

should be a covered service. There is more research showing that neurofeedback 

is effective than many medical and surgical services that are routinely covered 

by my insurer. That is not fair. It is not parity. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 26, 2009 

Received: May 26, 2009 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 809b642b 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web
I strongly urge that you write and enforce regulations that require health 

insurers to use the same scientific review criteria for mental health services 

such as neurofeedback that they use for most medical procedures. If they do so, 

then I am confident neurofeedback will be covered and this safe and effective 

treatment will be available to the very large number of people in our country 

for whom more tradtitional treatment approaches were not enough.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, November 1, 1995 (138), Para 138.23 Adjournment]
[Page 1827]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.138.23  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. POSHARD, at 10 o'clock and 15 minutes p.m., the House 
adjourned.
```
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/18/15 9:52 PM

Received: July 15, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k00-nwx8

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2368

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: chris easton

Address: 

301 south stewart st

danville, IL, 61832

Email: chris.easton@mac.com

Phone: 217.775.7595

General Comment

We do not need more rules. If we are smart enough not to trust social security will be available to 

sustain us we can pick our own investment options. LESS REGULATION may not seem better 

for those seeking this new regulation. I believe the system is just fine as it is. Please do not create 

more bureaucracy. THANKS!
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0005597 26-FEB-2014 08:09 AM
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paulson Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Karen L. Johannes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Karen L. Johannes                                          
|Karen L. Johannes Chief Financial Officer
Paulson Capital Corp.

May 15, 2009

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Paulson Capital Corp. and will be
retained by Paulson Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 236.105 Electric lock.

Electric lock, except forced-drop type, shall be tested at least once every two years.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United Bancorporation
of Alabama, Inc. for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Mitchell D. Staples, principal accounting officer of the Corporation, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1). The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and (2). The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Corporation. Date:  August 6, 2004
    By:
    /s/ Mitchell D. StaplesMitchell D. Staplesprincipal accounting officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRotational and translational effects in collisions of electronically excited diatomic hydridesCollisional quenching and vibrational energy proceed competitively with rotational energy transfer for several excited states of the diatomic radicals OH, NH, and CH. This occurs for a wide variety of molecular collision partners. This phenomenon permits the examination of the influence of rotational motion on the collision dynamics of these theoretically tractable species. Measurements can also be made as a function of temperature, i.e., collision velocity. In OH (sup 2 sigma +), both vibrational transfer and quenching are found to decrease with an increase in rotational level, while quenching decreases with increasing temperature. This behavior indicates that for OH, anisotropic attractive forces govern the entrance channel dynamics for these collisions. The quenching of NH (sup 3 pi sub i) by many (although not all) collision partners also decreases with increasing rotational and translational energy, and NH (sup 1 pi) behaves much like OH (sup 2 sigma +). However, the quenching of CH (sup 2 delta) appears to decrease with increasing rotation but increases with increasing temperature, suggesting in this case anisotropic forces involving a barrier or repulsive wall. Such similarities and differences should furnish useful comparisons with both simple and detailed theoretical pictures of the appropriate collision dynamics.Document ID19900016777Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsCrosley, David R.*(Ruhr Univ., Bochum, Germany F.R. , United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 22, 1988Subject CategoryInorganic And Physical ChemistryReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186770MP-88-279NAS 1.26:186770Accession Number90N26093Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 176-30-05-70CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-16956Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016777.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 27.9 Assurance required. ( a ) *General.* Each application for Federal financial assistance to which this part applies, and each application to provide a facility, shall, as a condition to approval or extension of any Federal financial assistance pursuant to the application, contain, or be accompanied by, written assurance that the program or activity will be conducted or the facility operated in compliance with all the requirements imposed by or pursuant to this part. An applicant may incorporate these assurances by reference in subsequent applications to the Department.
( b ) *Future effect of assurances.* Recipients of Federal financial assistance, and transferees of property obtained by a recipient with the participation of Federal financial assistance, are bound by the recipient's assurance under the following circumstances: ( 1 ) When Federal financial assistance is provided in the form of a conveyance of real property or an interest in real property from the Department of Transportation to a recipient, the instrument of conveyance shall include a convenant running with the land binding the recipient and subsequent transferees to comply with the requirements of this part for so long as the property is used for the purpose for which the Federal financial assistance was provided or for a similar purpose.
( 2 ) When Federal financial assistance is used by a recipient to purchase or improve real property, the assurance provided by the recipient shall obligate the recipient to comply with the requirements of this part and require any subsequent transferee of the property, who is using the property for the purpose for which the Federal financial assistance was provided, to agree in writing to comply with the requirements of this part. The obligations of the recipient and transferees under this part shall continue in effect for as long as the property is used for the purpose for which Federal financial assistance was provided or for a similar purpose.
( 3 ) When Federal financial assistance is provided to the recipient in the form of, or is used by the recipient to obtain, personal property, the assurance provided by the recipient shall obligate the recipient to comply with the requirements of this part for the period it retains ownership or possession of the property or the property is used by a transferee for purposes directly related to the operations of the recipient.
( 4 ) When Federal financial assistance is used by a recipient for purposes other than to obtain property, the assurance provided shall obligate the recipient to comply with the requirements of this part for the period during which the Federal financial assistance is extended to the program or activity.
[44 FR 31468, May 31, 1979, as amended at 68 FR 51390, Aug. 26, 2003]
#### § 29.500 Must a Tribe undertake an annual audit?

A Tribe that meets the applicable thresholds under 2 CFR 200.501 must undertake an annual audit pursuant to the regulations set forth in 2 CFR part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, except to the extent that part 200 exempts a Tribe from complying with the audit requirements.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 837

To provide that, for purposes of making determinations for certain trade

remedies and trade adjustment assistance, imported semi-finished steel

slabs and taconite pellets produced in the United States shall be considered to be articles like or directly competitive with each other.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 2001

Mr. OBERSTAR (for himself and Mr. STUPAK) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide that, for purposes of making determinations for

certain trade remedies and trade adjustment assistance,

imported semi-finished steel slabs and taconite pellets

produced in the United States shall be considered to

be articles like or directly competitive with each other.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. POSITIVE ADJUSTMENT BY INDUSTRIES IN4 JURED BY IMPORTS.

5 For purposes of making a determination under sec6 tion 202(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2252(b))

7 with respect to increased imports of semi-finished steel
2

•HR 837 IH

1 slabs, taconite pellets produced in the United States shall

2 be considered to be an article like or directly competitive

3 with such semi-finished steel slabs.

4 SEC. 2. COUNTERVAILING AND ANTIDUMPING DUTY DE5 TERMINATIONS.

6 In any case in which semi-finished steel slabs are the

7 subject of an investigation under title VII of the Tariff

8 Act of 1930, taconite pellets produced in the United States

9 shall be considered to be a domestic like product with re10 spect to such semi-finished steel slabs.

11 SEC. 3. DETERMINATIONS OF ELIGIBILITY FOR TRADE AD12 JUSTMENT ASSISTANCE IN CASES INVOLVING

13 TACONITE PELLETS.

14 For purposes of determining, under section 222 or

15 250 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2272, 2331)

16 the eligibility of a group of workers for adjustment assist17 ance under chapter 2 of title II of the Trade Act of 1974,

18 semi-finished steel slabs shall be considered to be articles

19 like or directly competitive with taconite pellets.

20 SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

21 In this Act:

22 (1) SEMI-FINISHED STEEL SLAB.—The term

23 ‘‘semi-finished steel slab’’ means a cold rectangular

steel section having a minimum thickness of 11 24 ⁄2

25 inches and a minimum width not less than twice the
3

•HR 837 IH

1 thickness, which is converted into finished steel

2 products by reheating and further hot working.

3 (2) TACONITE PELLET.—The term ‘‘taconite

4 pellet’’ means a pellet that is—

5 (A) made from very finely divided iron ore

6 concentrates formed and hardened by firing;

(B) is larger than 1 7 ⁄4 inch but smaller than

3 8 ⁄4 inch in diameter; and

9 (C) contains 60 to 67 percent iron.

Æ
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 884

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit advanced refunding

of private activity bonds with governmental bonds under certain limited

circumstances.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 2001

Mr. ISAKSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit

advanced refunding of private activity bonds with governmental bonds under certain limited circumstances.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADVANCED REFUNDING OF PRIVATE ACTIVITY

4 BONDS WITH GOVERNMENTAL BONDS UNDER

5 CERTAIN LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 149(d)

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to ad8 vanced refunding of certain private activity bonds) is

9 amended by inserting before the period at the end the fol-
2

•HR 884 IH

1 lowing: ‘‘unless the bond being refunded would, if issued

2 as of the date of such refunding, not be classified as a

3 private activity bond under section 141’’.

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

5 subsection (a) shall apply to advance refunding bonds

6 issued after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, October 25, 1995 (134), Para 134.4 Message from the Senate]
[Page 1589]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.134.4  message from the senate

  A message from the Senate by Mr. Lundregan, one of its clerks, 
announced that the Senate had passed without amendment a bill of the 
House of the following title:

       H.R. 1026. An Act to designate the United States Post 
     Office building located at 201 East Pikes Peak Avenue in 
     Colorado Springs, Colorado, as the ``Winfield Scott Stratton 
     Post Office.''

  The message also announced that the Senate had passed with amendments 
in which the concurrence of the House is requested, a bill of the House 
of the following title:

       H.R. 1606. An Act to designate the United States Post 
     Office building located at 24 Corliss Street, Providence, 
     Rhode Island, as the ``Harry Kizirian Post Office Building.''

  The message also announced that the Senate had passed a bill of the 
following title, in which the concurrence of the House is requested:

       S. 1328. An Act to amend the commencement dates of certain 
     temporary Federal judgeships.
```
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18

- 1294 V

Filed: October 7, 2019

UNPUBLISHED

DONALD WELLS

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU) ; Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Jimmy A. Zgheib, Zgheib Sayad, P. C., White Plains, NY , for petitioner.

Adriana Ruth Teitel , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On August 27, 2018

, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration (“S IRVA ” ) as a result of an influenza ( “ flu ” ) vaccine administered on October 4, 2017 . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit

of the Office of Special Masters.

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in

accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2 On October 4, 2019

, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, respondent has con cluded that petitioner’s medical course is

consistent with a SIRVA as defined by the V accine Injury Table. Id. at 5 . Respondent further agrees that petition er has satisfied all legal prerequi sites for compensation under

the V accine Act

. Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0512.html[7/20/2015 7:48:20 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-7w36

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0512

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Ray Anonymous

General Comment

I manage my own retirement stay out of it
C OURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Moore Freight Services, Inc., Charles

“ Chip ” Strader, and XMEX Transports,

L.L.C.,

Appellant s

.

v.

Lorena Munoz, Ind. and on Behalf of the

Est. of Lorenzo Munoz, and as N/F of CM,

a Minor Child, Leslie Munoz, Virginia

Munoz, Jessica Lopez, as N/F of AF and

JL, Minor Children and heirs to the Est. of

Roger Franceware, Dec., Rosa

Franceware, Individually and as Next

Friend of E.L.F., a Child.

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 4

- 00 254

- C V

Appeal from the

168 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2010

- 4169 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ant s ’ Charles “ Chip ” Strader, and XMEX Transports,

L.L.C.

, third motion for extension of time within which to file the brief until August 28 , 201 5

.

NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO F ILE THE APPELL ANT ’S

BR IEF W ILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Valerie R. Auge r , the Appell ant ’s attorney, prepare

t he Appell ant ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on o r before August 28 , 201 5

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 28 th day of July , 20 1 5

.

P E R CURIAM

Berfore McClure, CJ., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ

. (H ughes, J., not participatin g)