51840 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—DVD Copy Control 

Association 

Notice is hereby given that, on June 

15, 2007, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the 

National Cooperative Research and 

Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 

et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), DVD Copy Control 

Association (‘‘DVD CCA’’) has filed 

written notifications simultaneously 

with the Attorney General and the 

Federal Trade Commission disclosing 

changes in its membership. The 

notifications were filed for the purpose 

of extending the Act’s provisions 

limiting the recovery of antitrust 

plaintiffs to actual damages under 

specified circumstances. Specifically, 

Bestguide Group Limited, Kowloon, 

Hong Kong-China; Coresystem 

Technology Limited, Kowloon, Hong 

Kong-China; CustomFlix Labs, Inc., 

Scotts Valley, CA; Dong Kwang Display 

Co., Ltd., Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of 

Korea; Estorage Technology Co., Ltd., 

Taipei, Taiwan; and Tonfunk GmbH 

Ermsleben, Falkenstein/Harz, Germany 

have been added as parties to this 

venture. Also, Taiwan Thick-Film Ind. 

Corp., Taipei Hsien, TAIWAN has 

withdrawn as a party to this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and DVD CCA 

intends to file additional written 

notifications disclosing all changes in 

membership. 

On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its 

original notification pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the Act. The Department of 

Justice published a notice in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on March 21, 2007. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on June 8, 2007 (72 FR 31856). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 07–4431 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Glass Technology 

Development Corporation 

Notice is hereby given that, on June 

15, 2007, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the 

National Cooperative Research and 

Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 

et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Glass Technology 

Development Corporation (‘‘FTDC’’) has 

filed written notifications 

simultaneously with the Attorney 

General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing (1) the identities 

of the parties to the venture and (2) the 

nature and objective of the venture. The 

notifications were filed for the purpose 

of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting 

the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 

actual damages under specified 

circumstances. 

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, 

the identities of the parties to the 

venture are: A O Smith Corporation, 

Florence, KY; EIC Group North 

America, Lewisville, TX; Ferro 

Corporation, Cleveland, OH; Hanson 

Industries, Lynchburg, VA; Henkel 

Surface Technologies, Madison Heights, 

MI; KMI Systems, Inc., Crystal Lake, IL; 

Mapes and Sprowl Steel, Elk Grove 

Village, IL; Pemco Corporation, 

Baltimore, MD; Porcelain Industries, 

Dickson, TN; Roesch, Inc., Belleville, IL; 

and URS Corporation, Franklin, TN. 

Glass Technology Development 

Corporation’s general area of planned 

activity is to conduct joint research 

necessary to develop and demonstrate 

commercially viable technology for 

manufacturing products using new 

porcelain enamel coating technology 

developed by the United States 

Government. 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 07–4437 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE4410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—IMS Global Learning 

Consortium, Inc. 

Notice is hereby given that, on August 

7, 2007, pursuant to section 6(a) of the 

National Cooperative Research and 

Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 

et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), IMS Global Learning 

Consortium, Inc. has filed written 

notifications simultaneously with the 

Attorney General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing changes in its 

membership. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recover of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, K12, Inc., Herndon, VA has 

been added as a party to this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and IMS Global 

Learning Consortium, Inc. intends to file 

additional written notifications 

disclosing all changes in membership. 

On April 7, 2000, IMS Global 

Learning Consortium, Inc. filed its 

original notification pursuant to section 

6(a) of the Act. The Department of 

Justice published a notice in the Federal 

Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the 

Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 

55283). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on June 15, 2007. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the 

Act on July 24, 2007 (72 FR 40331). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 07–4439 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

At of 1993—Interactive Advertising 

Bureau 

Notice is hereby given that, on June 5, 

2007, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the 

National Cooperative Research and 

Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 

et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Interactive 

Advertising Bureau (‘‘IAB’’) has filed 

written notifications simultaneously 

with the Attorney General and the 

Federal Trade Commission disclosing 

additions or changes to its standards 

development activities. The 

notifications were filed for the purpose 

of extending the Act’s provisions 

limiting the recovery of antitrust 

plaintiffs to actual damages under 

specified circumstances. Specifically, 

IAB is currently developing Online 

Advertising Creative Delivery ‘‘Best 

Practices’’ Guidelines, Insertion Order 

and eBusiness Standards and Lead 

Generation Data Delivery ‘‘Best 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES