alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Minority Enterprise Development Week, 2007

Minority Enterprise Development Week is a chance to highlight the accomplishments of minority business owners and underscore our commitment to strengthening minority businesses and helping these entrepreneurs succeed.

Minority business owners have made our Nation stronger. Our thriving and resilient economy is the envy of the world, and minority business owners are expanding opportunities for their fellow Americans.

More than 8 million jobs have been created in our country since August 2003, and minority businesses have contributed to this progress. Our economy has experienced more than 5 years of uninterrupted growth, and the unemployment rate remains low. My Administration has worked with the Congress to deliver needed tax relief, and this has left more money in the hands of minority business owners to reinvest in their employees, their communities, and our country's robust economy. By adopting sound policies that help our businesses continue to grow and expand, we are ensuring that America remains the land of the entrepreneur.

Our Nation has the most innovative, industrious, and talented people on Earth and when we unleash their entrepreneurial spirit, there is no limit to what the American people can achieve. During Minority Enterprise Development Week, and throughout the year, we recognize the vital contributions of minority business owners. These dedicated individuals are helping create a more hopeful society for themselves and their families. We will continue to strive for a society where personal effort is rewarded and where the American dream is within the reach of all our citizens.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 9 through September 15, 2007, as Minority Enterprise Development Week. I call upon all Americans to celebrate this week with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities to recognize the many contributions of our Nation's minority enterprises.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-eighth day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second.

[FR Doc. 07-4313

Billing code 3195-01-P
Order entered December 4, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00548-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.V., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-04-11968-V

ORDER

The reporter’s record is overdue. The record before this Court contains appellant’s 

Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs or an Appeal Bond filed in the trial 

court. Accordingly, appellant is allowed to proceed without advance payment of costs. See TEX.

R. CIV. P. 145(a). We ORDER Ms. Finkley to file the reporter’s record WITHIN THIRTY 

DAYS of the date of this order. 

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### Harriet H. Armstrong Respondent, v. Thomas Armstrong, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements. Opinion by

Bockes. J.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 235 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 235

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 
percentage of completion method of accounting shall not be required to 
be used with respect to contracts for the manufacture of property if no 
     payments are required to be made before the completion of the 
                     manufacture of such property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Ehlers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 
percentage of completion method of accounting shall not be required to 
be used with respect to contracts for the manufacture of property if no 
     payments are required to be made before the completion of the 
                     manufacture of such property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCEPTION FROM PERCENTAGE OF COMPLETION METHOD FOR CERTAIN 
              MANUFACTURING CONTRACTS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 460(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rule for manufacturing 
contracts) is amended by striking ``unless'' and all that follows and 
inserting ``unless--
                    ``(A) such contract involves the manufacture of--
                            ``(i) any unique item of a type which is 
                        not normally included in the finished goods 
                        inventory of the taxpayer, or
                            ``(ii) any item which normally requires 
                        more than 12 calendar months to complete 
                        (without regard to the period of the contract), 
                        and
                    ``(B) any payment for the manufacture of such item 
                is required to be made before the manufacture of such 
                item is completed.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the amendments made by section 804 of the 
Tax Reform Act of 1986.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Application of The City of New York, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Lands Required for the Opening of Hawkstone Street. City Real Estate Company, Appellant.

(Submitted January 3, 1911;

decided January 10, 1911.)

Motion to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 199 N. Y. 567.)
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyf-w65c

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2182

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: steve clark

General Comment

I am against the rule change. More government oversight and reporting requirements interferes 

with the free market, and our personal freedoms.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Somanetics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
we, Bruce J. Barrett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
William M. Iacona, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Controller and
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Dated: October 3, 2006                  /s/ Bruce J. Barrett
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Bruce J. Barrett,
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: October 6, 2006                  /s/ William M. Iacona
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        William M. Iacona,
                                        Vice President and Chief Financial
                                        Officer, Controller and Treasurer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00487

- CV

Mary Alice SAIZ

, Appellant

v.

SUSSER HOLDINGS CORPORATION and Stripes LLC, Appellees

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- 02

- 28,530

- CV The Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that ap pellees, Susser Holdings Corporation and Stripes LLC, recover their costs of this appeal from appellant, Mary Alice Saiz.

SIGNED March 11, 2015.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
#### Thomas McCraith, *Respondent, v.*The National Mohawk Valley Bank, *Appellant.*

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
-----Original Message----- 

From: slustgarden@gmail.com [mailto:slustgarden@gmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 12:30 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Steve Lustgarden 

28 Hanover Court 

Santa Cruz, CA 95062
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, July 12, 2007, 1 p.m. to July 12, 2007, 4 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 13, 2007, 72 FR 32674-32675.                

The meeting will be held July 11, 2007. The meeting time and location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: June 19, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-3119 Filed 6-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 30.17 Waivers. ( a ) The Secretary may waive the restrictions imposed by section 115 of the Airport Safety Act on the use of a product or service in a project if the Secretary determines that: ( 1 ) Application of the restriction to such product, service, or project would not be in the public interest;
( 2 ) Products or services of the same class or kind are not produced or offered in the United States, or in any foreign country that is not listed by the U.S.T.R. in sufficient and reasonable available quantities and of a satisfactory quality; or
( 3 ) Exclusion of such product or service from the project would increase the cost of the overall project contract by more than 20 percent.
( b ) The President or the Secretary may waive the restrictions imposed by section 109(a) of the Continuing Resolution with respect to an individual contract if the President or the Secretary determines that such action is necessary in the public interest, on a contract-by-contract basis. The Secretary may apply the factors listed in paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section in determining whether a waiver is in the public interest.
( c ) The authority of the President or the Secretary to issue waivers may not be delegated. The Department shall publish notice of any waiver granted pursuant to this part by the President or the Secretary in the Federal Register within ten days. The notice shall describe in detail the contract involved, the specific reasons for granting the waiver, and how the waiver meets the criteria of this section.
-----Original Message----- 

From: dguthrie@mulldrlg.com [mailto:dguthrie@mulldrlg.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:31 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Deann Guthrie 

PO Box 2758 

Wichita, KS 67201
#### § 29.407 Does the award of funds for discretionary or competitive grants entitle the Tribe to receive contract support costs?

Receipt of discretionary or competitive grant awards does not entitle the Tribe to receive contract support costs or any other amounts identified in 25 U.S.C. 5325. However, a Tribe may use grant awards to cover overhead and administrative expenses associated with operation of the grant, as provided in the grant award.
From: Tom Seibold [mailto:tseib@aol.com] 

Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 3:14 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Please do not attempt to crush the freedom of investors and security brokers to make their own 

investment choices. 

Please allow consenting adults to determine what they will buy and what they will sell without government 

interference.

Tom

private investor

Kansas City
Page 1 of 1 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

Docket: ~r23Q9-0008 

Request for Information for Paul Wellstonc and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: IRS-2009,~~_0_8~00.01 

Request fur Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity 

and Addidon Equity Act of 2008 

Docu mcn t: 5RS=-200?:0008:0022 

Cnmment on FR Doc # E9-09629 

Submitter Information 

Name: susan York Wade 

Address: 

Fnrt Worth, 

St~bmitter's Hepresentstivc: Private Practice 

Organization: Susan Wade I,CSW 

General Comment 

When regulating mental health parity, I encourage you to cxatni ne the 

copaylreimhursanent fee ratios. It is becoming more common in my practice tn 

see copays as hidl as 95% of the reimbursed rate. 

This is not mental health panty. This is i~lsurai~ce companies claiming mental 

health parity and passing the cost to the insured. 

Susan Wade LCSW
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jorge Tomas Pina-Salazar, Appellant

No. 06-22-00019-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 102nd District Court of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

21F0383-102). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice 

Stevens and Justice van Cleef participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment herein by striking

the entire line that begins “THIS SENTENCE SHALL RUN.” As modified, the judgment of the 

trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Jorge Tomas Pina-Salazar, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 12, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 28,2009 

'I'racking No. 809aefed 

Docket: IRS-20.09-0008 

Rquvst for Inforn~ation for Paul Wellstone and Pete Domcnici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Acl of 2008 

Comment On: IRS:ZO{l~l-00~X-01,O I 

Request for Information Regarding (he Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Hcaltll Y mity 

and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: 1R S-2009-00084043 

Cornmcnt on FK Lloc # E9-09629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Angela Cumstock 

Add~.css: 

MO, 

General Comment 

Comments regarding Rcgulato ty Guidance U SCG-2007-27022 

page 19157,II I3 specific areas I rind 4 

1 am at1 occupational therapist who provides EEG biofeedback treatment to 

individuals with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Mood Uicfrrders. EEG 

biofcdback is an cmpiricnlly validated and widely rewgnixed etTcctive [Ion 

medication treatment for AD HI), as well as nther conditions. There arc ova 511 

studies evaluating the effec?iveness of EEG tl~ofeedhack in the treatment of 

ADHL), Substance Use disorders and Autism. . A rccent review of this literature 

conrludd "EEC; biofeedback meets the American A~ademy of Child and 

Adolescent Psychiatry criteria fur" Clinical Guidelines "fur treatrncn I of ADHD. " 

This means that EEG bjufccdback meek the same criteria as to mdicatiotl for 

treating ADHD, and that EEG biofccdback "should a1 ways he considered a an 

mtervention for this disorder by the ~linieian". 

This service has bccn denied by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, Unitvd Behavioral 

I Tealth, Blue Cross, Cigna, and A nierigmup. 

This is limitatiorl of an effective and validated treatment Sir a nlctltal health 

problem. Thc rcasol-rs given by the insurance companies fir this dc~~ial fell illto 

Iwo categories: 1 ) our company does not wvm biolkcdback for Merital Health 

prubl~nis or 2) there is not yet suficient evidence Ibr 111c cfficacy of EG 

biofccdback. As such, they are using evidmce-bascd it cria that are far more 

rcstrictive for 1ne11ta1 health services than the critcria wt~icli are used for 

mcdical:surg~cal services. There are many routine mdical arid surgical 
Page 2 of2 

procedures which have far fewer controlled studies about their efficacy than does 

EEG biofeedback. These mcdjcal and surgical procedures arc gc~lerally ilot 

limitcd bccause of concerns about how many co~ltrolled studies have bem 

pmformed about than. 

We believe that the parity regulations, b~sed on legal reviews of the parity 

statue should require that cnlployers and plans pay for the same rangc and 

smpc of sewices for Behavioral Treatmmts as they do for Med Surg bmefils and 

that a plan cannot he more restrictive in their managed care criteria and reviews 

for MI1 and SA disorders whe11 compared to hled Surg. Today plans are being 

more restrictive in how they rcvicw evidenced based Mental Hcaith and Substance 

Abuse 'Treatments when compared to Mcd Sut-g treatments. This violata both 

the intent and lctter of the parity statute and wc hope that the regulations will 

clarify that this can't continue. 

Sincerely, 

Angela fitnstock, OTR/L, BCIA-C
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11004 and #11005]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Minnesota (FEMA-1717-DR), dated 08/23/2007. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         08/18/2007 and continuing.
 EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/23/2007. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/22/2007. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/23/2008.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 08/23/2007, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*
                     Fillmore, Houston, Winona. *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* Minnesota: Mower, Olmsted, Wabasha. Iowa: Allamakee, Howard, Winneshiek. Wisconsin: Buffalo, La Crosse, Trempealeau, Vernon. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.250Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.125Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.250Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000For Economic Injury:Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 110046 and for economic injury is 110050. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 07-4307 Filed 8-31-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-M