alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0628.html[7/21/2015 7:26:08 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-517s

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0628

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Irene Siverson

Organization: Irene

General Comment

my freedom is important !!

I am not dumb and do not need to be dumb down!!

I have a head that God created and expects me to use.

That gives me to ability to use my head to make the chooses that I choose to make weather they are right or

 wrong It is my choose and I choose to live by those chooses.

Do not take my freedom away!!

I have read the last chapter of this book. I know you will not listen!

I know that you will take away everything. 

This is my vote stop do not treat me as though I am dumb!
EXHIBIT 24.15
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned, as Controller of West Texas Utilities Company (the "Company"),
hereby makes, constitutes and appoints Paul J. Brower his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power and authority to execute in the name
and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all capacities, the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1997 and any and all amendments thereto, to be
filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any other
documents and instruments incidental thereto, and to file the same, with all
exhibits thereto and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, hereby granting to such attorney-in-fact, and agent,
full power and authority of substitution and revocation in the premises and full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully for all intents and
purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person and hereby ratifying and
confirming all that such attorney-in-fact and agent, may do or cause to be done
by virtue of this Power of Attorney.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto executed this Power of Attorney this 27th
day of January, 1998.


                                R. Russell Davis
                                Controller





Subscribed and sworn to before me this 27th day of January, 1998 by 
R. Russell Davis.

                                 Kit Hill
                                 Notary Public

My Commission Expires:
6-14-2001
[Slavie
      Federal Savings Bank Letterhead]

     

    October
      26, 2005

    


    Via:
      Federal Express, certified mail and facsimile

    


    Mr.
      Ronald Benfield

    Benfield
      Properties, LLC

    103
      North
      Main Street

    Bel
      Air,
      Maryland 21014

    


    
      	
              Re:

            	
              Lease
                between Benfield Properties, LLC and Slavie Federal Savings Bank
                for 601
                Edgewood Road

            


    

    


    Dear
      Mr.
      Benfield:

    


    Pursuant
      to the above-referenced Lease, specifically Section 1.2 Renewal Option, please
      accept this letter as notice of election that we will not be renewing our lease
      of 601 Edgewood Road following the expiration of the initial term on
      April 30, 2006. Unfortunately, we have not been able to significantly grow
      our deposit base at this location to offset expenses. Therefore, we can no
      longer justify the continued operation of this branch in Edgewood. Pursuant
      to
      the Lease, we intend to return all keys and provide to you all other required
      information on or before April 30, 2006. If you intend to schedule a
      walk-through of the property prior to the end of the lease term, please call
      me
      to schedule same.

    


    On
      behalf
      of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to inform you it has been
      a
      pleasure working with you the last five years. If you have any questions, please
      do not hesitate to contact me. I can be reached at 410-893-2555.

    


    Sincerely,

    


    /s/
      Philip E. Logan  

    Philip
      E.
      Logan 

    President
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-10990.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-10990.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                        229,691
<SECURITIES>                                   14,886
<RECEIVABLES>                                  97,056
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,919
<INVENTORY>                                   261,395
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              619,357
<PP&E>                                        789,672
<DEPRECIATION>                                214,121
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,260,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         355,587
<BONDS>                                       587,369
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                    260,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,260,880
<SALES>                                     4,327,135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            4,350,238
<CGS>                                       3,705,655
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               4,137,921
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               70,791
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             44,748
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (37,009)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   10,529
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (47,538)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (10,717)
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (58,255)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0


</TABLE>
From: Rob Dixon [mailto:rob@dixonfinancialservices.com] 

Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 10:52 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: 1210-AB32

RE: 1210-AB32

I’m a 44 yr old small business owner and Financial Advisor. I’ve been helping people make good 

decisions about their money and investments for 20+ years now. Eleven years ago, in 2004, I moved to 

a fee-based practice to better align myself with my clients’ best interests and to hold myself to a higher 

level of accountability ala fiduciary responsibility/liability.

I put clients’ interests first and I oppose this legislation as it is currently written. In looking at the big 

picture, this is obviously a very important topic that needs further clarification; however, the finer points 

are being made hastily and without due diligence as to their implications. I agree there should be a 

carefully crafted, universal fiduciary standard. Regulation should make it easier for the American people 

to get help from advisors, not more difficult. Improved disclosures would go a long way and be very cost 

effective as the costs to implement this proposal are certainly understated. Furthermore, the proposed 

grandfathering would require me to get new paperwork from almost every client or stop servicing those 

clients. 

Thank you for considering these points.

Robert Dixon, CFS, Wealth Advisor

2014 Five-Star Wealth Manager*

Dixon Financial Services

7733 Forsyth Blvd, Suite 1100

Saint Louis MO 63105

314-961-6100

Dixon Financial, independently owned and operated since 2004. Investment advisory services offered through Cambridge 

Investment Research Advisors, a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Securities offered through Cambridge Investment 

Research Inc, Broker/Dealer, Member FINRA.

*Winners of the Five-Star Wealth Manager Award must satisfy numerous requirements related to wealth management services 

and client retention. Third-party endorsement is not indicative of past or future results.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1192.html[7/22/2015 3:27:03 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-v70t

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1192

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Karen McDonald

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement. I do not need your help.
§ 31.10 Default upon failure to answer. ( a ) If the defendant does not answer within the time prescribed in § 31.9(a), the reviewing official may refer the complaint to an ALJ by filing the complaint and a statement that defendant has failed to answer on time.
( b ) Upon the referral of the complaint, the ALJ shall promptly serve on defendant in the manner prescribed in § 31.8, a notice that an initial decision will be issued under this section.
( c ) In addition, the ALJ shall assume the facts alleged in the complaint to be true, and, if such facts establish liability under § 31.3, the ALJ shall issue an initial decision imposing the maximum amount of penalties and assessments allowed under the statute.
( d ) Except as otherwise provided in this section, by failing to answer on time, the defendant waives any right to further review of the penalties and assessments imposed under paragraph (c) of this section, and the initial decision shall become final and binding upon the parties 30 days after it is issued.
( e ) If, before such an initial decision becomes final, the defendant files a motion seeking to reopen on the grounds that extraordinary circumstances prevented the defendant from answering, the initial decision shall be stayed pending the ALJ's decision on the motion.
( f ) If, on such motion, the defendant can demonstrate extraordinary circumstances excusing the failure to answer on time, the ALJ shall withdraw the initial decision in paragraph (c) of this section, if such a decision has been issued, and shall grant the defendant an opportunity to answer the complaint.
( g ) A decision of the ALJ denying a defendant's motion under paragraph (e) of this section is not subject to reconsideration under § 31.38.
( h ) The defendant may appeal to the authority head the decision denying a motion to reopen by filing a notice of appeal in accordance with § 31.26 within 15 days after the ALJ denies the motion. The timely filing of a notice of appeal shall stay the initial decision until the authority head decides the issue.
( i ) If the defendant files a timely notice of appeal, the Docket Clerk shall forward two copies of the notice of appeal to the authority head, and shall forward or make available the record of the proceeding to the authority head.
( j ) The authority head shall decide expeditiously whether extraordinary circumstances excuse the defendant's failure to answer on time based solely on the record before the ALJ.
( k ) If the authority head decides that extraordinary circumstances excused the defendant's failure to answer on time, the authority head shall remand the case to the ALJ with instructions to grant the defendant an opportunity to answer.
( l ) If the authority head decides that the defendant's failure to answer on time is not excused, the authority head shall reinstate the initial decision of the ALJ, which shall become final and binding upon the parties 30 days after the authority head issues such decision.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

IAS of: May 28,2009 I 

l~rackin~ No. 809ncaf0 I 

l~omments Due: Mav 28,20091 

socket: I RS-2009-0008 

Request for Infurmation for Paul Wellstone and P~tc Dornenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: !_1PS-2009P(l~_XIOOOl 

Rcqucst for information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Petc no~net~ici Mental Health Parity 

and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: iR.S:21304-l~i)08.~_9~Pl 6 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-09629 

Submitter Information 

Name; Kirk D. 1,ittle 

Address: 

Florence, KY, 

Organization: Little Psychological Services, PLLC 

General Comment 

T am a licensed hcalth care provider in Kentucky and Ohio (doctor practicing 

health psychology). I use a type of treatmml callcd "Neurofeedback" which is (z 

behavioral treatment that uscs EEG and computer equipment to modify brainwaves. 

It has been extensively studied for almost 40 years now, but nevertheless, we 

can't get treatment to most people because it is unfairly denied by insurance 

cumpanies. Therefore. unly the wealthiest of individuals are able to afford the 

most powerful and effectltive treatment we have for neurological problems, such as 

head ~nj urics, seimres, autism, and learning disabilities. 

Recause of Neurofcudback's power md through word of mouth, I am able to make a 

comfortable living doing this for my rich neighbors. It sccms wmng not to make 

it available to the public at large, cspecinlly for those who arc not helped by 

my other means. l'here ore so many who could he Inore active, productive 

citizens if they only had access to this type of treatment. 

Please consider cxpnnding the availability of Neurofeedback tu our friends and 

neighbum who need it the most. 

Thank You, 

Kirk D. Littlc, Psy. D., BClA-EEG 

Licensed Psyc~~ulogist
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAerodynamic characteristics of two rotorcraft airfoils designed for application to the inboard region of a main rotor bladeA wind tunnel investigation was conducted to determine the 2-D aerodynamic characteristics of two new rotorcraft airfoils designed especially for application to the inboard region of a helicopter main rotor blade. The two new airfoils, the RC(4)-10 and RC(5)-10, and a baseline airfoil, the VR-7, were all studied in the Langley Transonic Tunnel at Mach nos. from about 0.34 to 0.84 and at Reynolds nos. from about 4.7 to 9.3 x 10 (exp 6). The VR-7 airfoil had a trailing edge tab which is deflected upwards 4.6 degs. In addition, the RC(4)-10 airfoil was studied in the Langley Low Turbulence Pressure Tunnel at Mach nos. from 0.10 to 0.44 and at Reynolds nos. from 1.4 to 5.4 x 10 (exp 6) respectively. Some comparisons were made of the experimental data for the new airfoils and the predictions of two different theories. The results of this study indicates that both of the new airfoils offer advantages over the baseline airfoil. These advantages are discussed.Document ID19900014923Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsNoonan, Kevin W.*(Army Aerostructures Directorate Hampton, VA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1990Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-3009NAS 1.60:3009L-16737AVSCOM-TR-90-B-005Accession Number90N24239Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-61-59-76PROJECT: DA PROJ. 1L1-62211-A-47-AADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014923.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 26.37 What are a recipient's responsibilities for monitoring? ( a ) A recipient must implement appropriate mechanisms to ensure compliance with the requirements in this part by all program participants (*e.g.,* applying legal and contract remedies available under Federal, State, and local law). The recipient must set forth these mechanisms in its DBE program.
( b ) A recipient's DBE program must also include a monitoring and enforcement mechanism to ensure that work committed, or in the case of race-neutral participation, the work subcontracted, to all DBEs at contract award or subsequently is performed by the DBEs to which the work was committed or subcontracted to, and such work is counted according to the requirements of § 26.55. This mechanism must include a written verification that you have reviewed contracting records and monitored the work site to ensure the counting of each DBE's participation is consistent with its function on the contract. The monitoring to which this paragraph (b) refers may be conducted in conjunction with monitoring of contract performance for other purposes such as a commercially useful function review.
( c ) You must effectively implement the following running tally mechanisms: ( 1 ) With respect to achieving your overall goal, you must use a running tally that provides for a frequent comparison of cumulative DBE awards/commitments to DOT-assisted prime contract awards to determine whether your current implementation of contract goals is projected to be sufficient to meet your annual goal. This mechanism should inform your decisions to implement goals on contracts to be advertised according to your established contract goal-setting process.
( 2 ) With respect to each DBE commitment, you must use a running tally that provides for a frequent comparison of payments made to each listed DBE relative to the progress of work, including payments for such work to the prime contractor to determine whether the contractor is on track with meeting its DBE commitment and whether any projected shortfall exists that requires the prime contractor's good faith efforts to address to meet the contract goal pursuant to § 26.53(g).
[89 FR 24966, Apr. 9, 2024]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0798.html[7/21/2015 1:05:17 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-8vx5

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0798

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Margaret Henderson

Address:

13722 72nd Ave. East

Puyallup, WA, 98373

General Comment

I do not want the federal government involved in oversight of my retirement accounts. Myself and my personal

 financial planner whom I choose are highly capable of charting my personal retirement plans
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

No. DA 22-0523

STATE OF MONTANA

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL VOYLES

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good 

cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to 

and including November 15, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve

Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 13 2023

09/13/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0523
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                           CLARCOR INC. SUBSIDIARIES
 
                            AS OF FEBRUARY 19, 1997
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        JURISDICTION OF
                                                        INCORPORATION OR                    PERCENT OF
                NAME                                      ORGANIZATION                      OWNERSHIP
------------------------------------                    ----------------                    ----------
<S>                                                     <C>                                 <C>
CLARCOR Consumer Products, Inc.                         Delaware                                100%
  J.L. Clark, Inc.                                      Delaware                                100%
  Clark Europe, Inc.                                    Delaware                                100%
CLARCOR Filtration Products, Inc.                       Delaware                                100%
  Airguard Industries, Inc.                             Kentucky                                100%
  Baldwin Filters, Inc.                                 Delaware                                100%
     Baldwin Filters N.V.                               Belgium                                 100%*
     Baldwin Filters Limited                            United Kingdom                          100%*
     Baldwin South Africa, Inc.                         Delaware                                100%
       Baldwin-Unifil S.A.                              South Africa                             70%
     Hastings Filters, Inc.                             Delaware                                100%
       Hastings Filters Ltd. Canada                     Canada                                  100%
  Baldwin Filters (Aust.) Pty.
     Limited                                            Australia                                50%
  Clark Filter, Inc.                                    Delaware                                100%
  Filtros Baldwin de Mexico                             Mexico                                   90%
CLARCOR International, Inc.                             Delaware                                100%
  Baldwin-Weifang Filters Ltd.                          China                                    60%
CLARCOR Foreign Sales Corporation                       Virgin Islands                          100%
CLARCOR Trading Company                                 Delaware                                100%*
</TABLE>
 
------------------------------
* Direct or indirect
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1368.html[7/23/2015 6:24:12 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvl-ab6f

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1368

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Shirley Mapes

General Comment

Hey..... Leave our retirement money alone! that includes 401s, IRAs, Roths,,, you name it and LEAVE US

 ALONE!!!!!!!