alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 111

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 4, 2001.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 8) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to phase out the estate and gift

taxes over a 10-year period, and for other purposes. The bill

shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendment

recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now

printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as

amended, and on any further amendment thereto to final

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of

debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; (2) the further amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying

this resolution, if offered by Representative Rangel of New

York or his designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any point of order, shall be considered as read, and
2

•HRES 111 EH

shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and

controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one

motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 26.9 How does the Department issue guidance and interpretations under this part? ( a ) Only guidance and interpretations (including interpretations set forth in certification appeal decisions) consistent with this part 26 and issued after March 4, 1999 express the official positions and views of the Department of Transportation or any of its operating administrations.
( b ) The Secretary of Transportation, Office of the Secretary of Transportation, FHWA, FTA, and FAA may issue written interpretations of or written guidance concerning this part. Written interpretations and guidance are valid, and express the official positions and views of the Department of Transportation or any of its operating administrations, only if they are issued over the signature of the Secretary of Transportation or if they contain the following statement:
The General Counsel of the Department of Transportation has reviewed this document and approved it as consistent with the language and intent of 49 CFR part 26.
[72 FR 15617, Apr. 2, 2007]
###### Editorial Note on Part 195

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.250 Clearance between pipe and underground structures.

Any pipe installed underground must have at least 12 inches (305 millimeters) of clearance between the outside of the pipe and the extremity of any other underground structure, except that for drainage tile the minimum clearance may be less than 12 inches (305 millimeters) but not less than 2 inches (51 millimeters). However, where 12 inches (305 millimeters) of clearance is impracticable, the clearance may be reduced if adequate provisions are made for corrosion control.

[Amdt. 195-22, 46 FR 38360, July 27, 1981, as amended by Amdt. 195-63, 63 FR 37506, July 13, 1998]
Docket: IRS-2009-0008 

Request for Information for Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 

2008 

Comment On: IRS-2009-0008-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: IRS-2009-0008-0074 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-09629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Robert Dickson, LPC, BCIA Fellow 

Address: 

Houston, TX, 

Organization: Southwest Health Technology Foundation 

Government Agency Type: Federal 

Government Agency: HHS 

General Comment 

Please be advised that EEG biofeedback is efficacious in treating certain types of 

depression, also addictions, ADDHD, anxiety disorder, sleep disorder, bruxism, 

seizure disorder, bi-polar disorder and other disorders arizing out of or within the 

central nervous system. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 28, 2009 

Tracking No. 809b9918 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 21, 2011

h1114 

# Order

November 21, 2011

143052

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143052 COA: 298827 ROBERT KING, Wayne CC: 06-003811 Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 18, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
IV

House Calendar No. 13

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 111

[Report No. 107–39]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to amend the Internal Revenue

Code of 1986 to phase out the estate and gift taxes over a 10-year

period, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 3, 2001

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to amend

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to phase out the

estate and gift taxes over a 10-year period, and for

other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 8) to amend

4 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to phase out the estate

5 and gift taxes over a 10-year period, and for other pur6 poses. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment.
2

HRES 111 RH

1 The amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways

2 and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as

3 adopted. The previous question shall be considered as or4 dered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amend5 ment thereto to final passage without intervening motion

6 except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended,

7 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank8 ing minority member of the Committee on Ways and

9 Means; (2) the further amendment printed in the report

10 of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution,

11 if offered by Representative Rangel of New York or his

12 designee, which shall be in order without intervention of

13 any point of order, shall be considered as read, and shall

14 be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and

15 controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one

16 motion to recommit with or without instructions.

House Calendar No. 13

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 111

[Report No. 107–39]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to

amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 tophase out the estate and gift taxes over a 10-year period, and for other purposes.

APRIL 3, 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–277 

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 2862, SCIENCE, STATE, JUSTICE, COMMERCE, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2006 

NOVEMBER 8, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 538] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 538, by a nonrecord vote, reports the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report to accompany H.R. 2862, the Science, State, Justice, Commerce, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006, and against 

its consideration. The resolution also provides that the conference 

report shall be considered as read. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration is necessary because the conference report (H. Rept. 109–272) was filed 

with the House on Monday, November 7, 2005, and it may be considered by the House as early as Wednesday, November 9, 2005, 

which would violate clause 8 of rule XXII (requiring a three-day 

layover of conference reports and the accompanying joint explanatory statement). 

Æ
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0871.html[7/21/2015 4:54:32 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-gcym

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0871

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Alex Maher

General Comment

Hello,

Let our family make our own decisions about our retirement. Stay out of people's retirement decisions and plans.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/09/15 

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvn-jwdq

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1417

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Germano Brandes

General Comment

thanks!

Attachments

002
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHITCAN for actively cooled hot-composite thermostructural analysisA computer code, high temperature composite analyzer (HITCAN), was developed to analyze/design hot metal matrix composite structures. HITCAN is a general purpose code for predicting the global structural and local stress-strain response of multilayered (arbitrarily oriented) metal matrix structures both at the constituent (fiber, matrix, and interphase) and the structural level, including the fabrication process effects. The thermomechanical properties of the constituents are considered to be nonlinearly dependent on several parameters, including temperature, stress, and stress rate. The computational procedure employs an incremental iterative nonlinear approach utilizing a multifactor-interaction material behavior model, i.e., the material properties are expressed in terms of a product of several factors that affect the properties. HITCAN structural analysis capabilities (static, load stepping - a multistep static analysis with material properties updated at each step, modal, and buckling) for cooled hot structures are demonstrated through a specific example problem.Document ID19910012249Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsChamis, C. C.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH., United States)*Murthy, P. L. N.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH., United States)*Singhal, S. N.*(Sverdrup Technology, Inc., Brook Park OH., United States)*Lackney, J. J.*(Sverdrup Technology, Inc., Brook Park OH., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-103750NAS 1.15:103750E-6002Meeting InformationMeeting: International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and ExpositionLocation: Orlando, FLCountry: United StatesStart Date: June 3, 1991End Date: June 6, 1991Sponsors:ASMEAccession Number91N21562Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 763-01-41Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910012249.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NUMBERS 13-20-00492-CV & 13-21-00085-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

SPEEDY CAR WASH, INCORPORATED

AND CARLOS A. GUERRA, GUARANTOR, Appellants,

v.

GERALD SHER, SUSAN SHER,

SPECIALTY CUISINE, INC. D/B/A

ISLE WASH AND ANDREW SHER,

TRUSTEE, Appellees.

 

On appeal from the 107th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

 

ORDER 

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva

Order Per Curiam

Appellants Speedy Car Wash, Inc. and Carlos A. Guerra, Guarantor have filed a 

motion to determine sufficiency of security and motion for emergency relief seeking to 
2

stay enforcement of the judgments in the underlying causes, particularly the receiver’s 

sale of real estate scheduled for October 22, 2021, which the trial court approved by order 

dated October 19, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.4(a)(4); id. R. 24.4(c). We grant the 

motion in part and temporarily stay enforcement of the underlying judgments, pending 

further order of this Court. See id. 24.4(c). The Court orders the appellees to file a

response to the motion to determine sufficiency of security and motion for emergency 

relief on or before October 28, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

21st day of October, 2021.
Editorial Note on Part 193
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

§ 193.2713 Training: operations and maintenance. ( a ) Each operator shall provide and implement a written plan of initial training to instruct— ( 1 ) All permanent maintenance, operating, and supervisory personnel— ( i ) About the characteristics and hazards of LNG and other flammable fluids used or handled at the facility, including, with regard to LNG, low temperatures, flammability of mixtures with air, odorless vapor, boiloff characteristics, and reaction to water and water spray;
( ii ) About the potential hazards involved in operating and maintenance activities; and
( iii ) To carry out aspects of the operating and maintenance procedures under §§ 193.2503 and 193.2605 that relate to their assigned functions; and
( 2 ) All personnel— ( i ) To carry out the emergency procedures under § 193.2509 that relate to their assigned functions; and
( ii ) To give first-aid; and
( 3 ) All operating and appropriate supervisory personnel— ( i ) To understand detailed instructions on the facility operations, including controls, functions, and operating procedures; and
( ii ) To understand the LNG transfer procedures provided under § 193.2513.
( b ) A written plan of continuing instruction must be conducted at intervals of not more than two years to keep all personnel current on the knowledge and skills they gained in the program of initial instruction.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0493.html[7/20/2015 3:16:53 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-z502

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0493

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Nan Walker

Address:

16234 Philip Hickey Drive

Baton Rouge, LA, 70810

Email: nanwalkerlsu@gmail.com

Phone: 225-252-0338

General Comment

I would like to make my own decisions about my retirement savings.
Exhibit 4.29


 


PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	
  U.S. $75,000,000

  	
   

  	
  Louisville, Kentucky, December 19,
  2005

  



 


Kentucky Utilities Company (“KU”), for value received,
hereby promises to pay to the order of FIDELIA Corporation (“FIDELIA”), in
lawful money of the United States of America (in freely transferable U.S.
dollars and in same day funds), in accordance with the method of payment
specified in that certain KU Loan Agreement dated as of December 19, 2005,
between FIDELIA and KU (“the Agreement”), the principal sum of $75,000,000,
which amount shall be payable at such times as provided in the Agreement.


 


KU
promises also to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount hereof in like
money and in like manner at the rates which shall be determined in accordance
with the provisions of the Agreement, said interest to be payable at the time
provided for in the Agreement. This Note is referred to in the Agreement and is
entitled to the benefits thereof and the security contemplated thereby. This
Note evidences a loan made by FIDELIA, during such time as such loan is being
maintained. This Note is subject to prepayment as specified in the Agreement. In
case KU defaults on the loan, the principal and accrued interest on this Note may be
declared to be due and payable in the manner and with the effect provided in
the Agreement.


 


 KU hereby waives presentment, demand, protest
or notice of any kind in connection with this Note.


 


This
Note shall be governed and construed and interpreted in accordance with the
laws of the State of Delaware.


 


	
   

  	
  Kentucky
  Utilities Company

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Daniel K.
  Arbough

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Daniel K.
  Arbough

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Director of
  Corporate Finance & Treasurer
#### § 220.2 [Reserved]
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-222 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Research and Development 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the CZECH REPUBLIC 

Signed at Prague February 22, 2008 

with 

Appendix 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
CZECH REPUBLIC 

Defense: Research and Development 

Agreement signed at Prague February 22, 2008; 

 Entered into force February 22, 2008. 

 With appendix. 



















Note: At the present time, the Treaty Office does not have the entire Czech text of this Agreement. If the Czech text becomes available, it will be added to this publication.
REGULATORY EVALUAnON

Directorate Identifier: 2008-NM-168-AD

Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? YES () explain NO (X) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Isthe AD significant? YES () explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES () explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation inAlaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation inAlaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES () explain NO (X)
#### § 371.101 If I operate as a household goods broker in interstate or foreign commerce, must I comply with subpart B of this part?

Yes, you must comply with all regulations in this subpart when you operate as a household goods broker offering services to individual shippers in interstate or foreign commerce. The regulations in this subpart do not apply to a household goods broker when providing services to commercial or government shippers in interstate or foreign commerce.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0978.html[7/21/2015 7:10:54 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-4ano

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0978

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Lloyd Staveteig

General Comment

I can plan my own retirment whithout any invasion from the government, so leave us seniors alone we don't want

 your invasion
§ 236.1007 Additional requirements for high-speed service. ( a ) A PTC railroad that conducts a passenger operation at or greater than 60 miles per hour or a freight operation at or greater than 50 miles per hour shall have installed a PTC system including or working in concert with technology that includes all of the safety-critical functional attributes of a block signal system meeting the requirements of this part, including appropriate fouling circuits and broken rail detection (or equivalent safeguards).
( b ) In addition to the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, a host railroad that conducts a freight or passenger operation at more than 90 miles per hour shall: ( 1 ) Have an approved PTCSP establishing that the system was designed and will be operated to meet the fail-safe operation criteria described in Appendix C to this part; and
( 2 ) Prevent unauthorized or unintended entry onto the main line from any track not equipped with a PTC system compliant with this subpart by placement of split-point derails or equivalent means integrated into the PTC system; and
( 3 ) Comply with § 236.1029(c).
( c ) In addition to the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, a host railroad that conducts a freight or passenger operation at more than 125 miles per hour shall have an approved PTCSP accompanied by a document (“HSR-125”) establishing that the system: ( 1 ) Will be operated at a level of safety comparable to that achieved over the 5 year period prior to the submission of the PTCSP by other train control systems that perform PTC functions required by this subpart, and which have been utilized on high-speed rail systems with similar technical and operational characteristics in the United States or in foreign service, provided that the use of foreign service data must be approved by the Associate Administrator before submittal of the PTCSP; and
( 2 ) Has been designed to detect incursions into the right-of-way, including incidents involving motor vehicles diverting from adjacent roads and bridges, where conditions warrant.
( d ) A railroad providing existing high-speed passenger service may request in its PTCSP that the Associate Administrator excuse compliance with one or more requirements of this section upon a showing that the subject service has been conducted with a high level of safety.
[75 FR 2699, Jan. 15, 2010, as amended at 83 FR 59218, Nov. 21, 2018]