alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: knein10@comcast.net [mailto:knein10@comcast.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:08 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Now the government wants more regulations and controls on my 401 (k)s and IRAs.

The government says "generally Americans cannot distinguish good investments from 

bad.

This is from the administration that blew $535 million on Solyndra "green energy 

boondoggle"

The government MUST STAY OUT of my 401 (k)s and my IRAs!!!

Linda Nein

Salem, Oregon
#### In the Matter of Acquiring Title by the City of New York, Respondent, to Certain Lands Situated on the Westerly Side of Hamilton Place in the Borough of Manhattan. Mary J. Cunningham, Appellant.

*Matter of City of New York (Hamilton Place),*148 App. Div. 302 affirmed.

(Argued May 30, 1911;

decided June 13, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court m the first judicial department, entered March 31, 1911, which affirmed so much of an order of Special Term as confirmed m part an award of commissioners of appraisal in condemnation proceedings, and dismissed the appeal from so much of said order as refused to confirm part of said award.

*Maurice Deiches*and *Monroe Goldwater*for appellant

*Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly*and *Francis J. Byrne*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ.
```

[112th Congress Public Law 238]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 1631]]

Public Law 112-238
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To extend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 for five years. <<NOTE: Dec. 
                       30, 2012 -  [H.R. 5949]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: FISA Amendments 
Act Reauthorization Act of 2012. 50 USC 1801 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FISA Amendments Act Reauthorization 
Act of 2012''.
SEC. 2. FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OF FISA AMENDMENTS ACT OF 2008.

    (a) Extension.--Section 403(b) of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 
(Public Law 110-261; 122 Stat. 2474) is amended--
            (1) in <<NOTE: 50 USC 1881 and note, 1881a-1881g. 18 USC 
        2511 note.>> paragraph (1), by striking ``December 31, 2012'' 
        and inserting ``December 31, 2017''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2) in the material preceding subparagraph 
        (A), by striking ``December 31, 2012'' and inserting ``December 
        31, 2017''.

    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The heading of section 404(b)(1) of the 
FISA Amendments Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-261; 122 Stat. 
2476) <<NOTE: 50 USC 1801 note.>> is amended by striking ``december 31, 
2012'' and inserting ``december 31, 2017''.

    Approved December 30, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5949:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112-645, Pt. 1 (Comm. on the Judiciary) and Pt. 2     
 
(Comm. on Intelligence).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            Sept. 12, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 27, 28, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 238.221 Glazing. ( a ) Passenger equipment shall comply with the applicable Safety Glazing Standards contained in part 223 of this chapter, if required by that part.
( b ) Each exterior window on a locomotive cab and a passenger car shall remain in place when subjected to: ( 1 ) The forces described in part 223 of this chapter; and
( 2 ) The forces due to air pressure differences caused when two trains pass at the minimum separation for two adjacent tracks, while traveling in opposite directions, each train traveling at the maximum authorized speed.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual Report of V-GPO,  INC.  (the  "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending  DECEMBER 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, NORMAN R. DOBIESZ,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition  and result of operations of the Company.



------------------------------------
Norman R. Dobiesz
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
March 30, 2004
§ 229.213 Locomotive manufacturing information. ( a ) Each railroad operating a locomotive subject to the requirements of this subpart must retain the following information: ( 1 ) The date upon which the locomotive was manufactured or remanufactured;
( 2 ) The name of the manufacturer or remanufacturer of the locomotive; and
( 3 ) The design specification to which the locomotive was manufactured or remanufactured.
( b ) The information required in paragraph (a) of this section must be located permanently in the locomotive cab or be provided within two business days upon request of FRA or an FRA-certified State inspector.
[71 FR 36914, June 28, 2006]
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 

Received: July 21, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k3r-797u

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2579

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Gary Klein

Address: 

7709 Thames

Texarkana, TX, 75503

General Comment

As a financial advisor, one of the most critical needs I address with clients is saving for a secure 

retirement. I work closely with investors to understand their needs, define their financial goals 

and create a tailored plan to help them achieve a secure and comfortable retirement. I am very 

concerned that the Department of Labor's proposed fiduciary rulemaking could limit my ability 

to provide these clients with meaningful education and assistance. 

I strive to serve the best interests of clients every day and fully support a best interest standard. I 

am concerned that under this proposal all investors, including lower and middle income investors 

and small businesses, would lose access to affordable guidance and assistance.

The DOL's proposal is well-intentioned, but after four years of ongoing discussions to craft an 

appropriate standard, I'm concerned the DOL has proposed a rule that still doesn't work. By 

limiting or eliminating the ability of investors to work with financial advisors in ways they find

meaningful and valuable, it will almost certainly result in less retirement savings at a time when 

savings rates are already low.
We owe it to the millions of investors who have entrusted us with their retirement savings to 

ensure we get a standard of care that truly serves their best interests.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 OMEGA FINANCIAL CORPORATION CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 This certification is intended to accompany Omega Financial Corporations
(the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September
30, 2004 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements
of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. I, David B. Lee, hereby certify in my capacity as the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company. Date: November 5, 2004
    
    /s/ David B. LeeDavid B. LeeChief Executive Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document. Page 26
§ 245.401 Review board established. ( a ) Any person who has been denied certification, denied recertification, or has had their certification revoked and believes that a railroad incorrectly determined that they failed to meet the certification requirements of this part when making the decision to deny or revoke certification, may petition the Administrator to review the railroad's decision.
( b ) The Administrator has delegated initial responsibility for adjudicating such disputes to the Certification Review Board (Board). The Board shall be composed of FRA employees.
No. 32,295

#### George E. McDonald, *Plaintiff,*v. J. J. Rhodes, Treasurer of the State of Kansas, *Defendant.*

(42 P. 2d 46)

Opinion filed December 8, 1934.

*J. H. Brady., N. E. Snyder*and *Leo McShane,*all of Kansas City, for the plaintiff. • '

*Boland Boynton,*attorney-general, and *Walter T. Griffin,*assistant attorney-general, for the defendant.

*Per Curiam:*

Until a state officer-elect has qualified according to law he has no greater privilege of access to the affairs of the office than any other private citizen; and the incumbent in lawful possession of the office cannot be compelled by mandamus to permit the officer-elect to make an audit of such office before the latter has given his official bond and had it approved in conformity with the pertinent statutes.

Motion for alternative writ denied.
PUBLIC LAW 106–258—AUG. 8, 2000 114 STAT. 655

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1910:

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106–268 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Apr. 13, considered and passed Senate.

July 25, considered and passed House.

WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 36 (2000):

Aug. 8, Presidential statement.

Æ

Public Law 106–258

106th Congress

An Act

To amend the Act establishing Women’s Rights National Historical Park to permit

the Secretary of the Interior to acquire title in fee simple to the Hunt House

located in Waterloo, New York.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACQUISITION OF HUNT HOUSE.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1601(d) of Public Law 96–607 (94

Stat. 3547; 16 U.S.C. 410ll(d)) is amended—

(1) in the first sentence—

(A) by inserting a period after ‘‘park’’; and

(B) by striking the remainder of the sentence; and

(2) by striking the last sentence.

(b) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 1601(c)(8) of Public Law

96–607 (94 Stat. 3547; 16 U.S.C. 410ll(c)(8)) is amended by striking

‘‘Williams’’ and inserting ‘‘Main’’.

Approved August 8, 2000.

Aug. 8, 2000

[S. 1910]
§ 1310.6 Furnishing copies of tariff publications. ( a ) Copies of tariffs, specific tariff provisions or tariff subscriptions shall be provided upon request to any interested person.
( b ) Except for providing to shippers the full text of tariff terms incorporated by reference into the bill of lading or other document embodying the contract of carriage for the transportation of household goods, as described in § 1310.4(a)(1), carriers may assess charges for furnishing copies of tariff publications to interested persons. If a charge is made, the charge must be reasonable, and identical for the same publications and delivery service.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 50666]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4304]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 20 September, 2007, at 10 a.m. in the Commission's offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 2001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks, and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: http://www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding 
the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address, or call 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign 
language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the 
Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.

    Dated in Washington, DC, August 27, 2007.
Thomas Luebke,
AIA, Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-4304 Filed 8-31-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
#### § 228.301 Purpose and scope.

The purpose of this subpart is to prescribe standards for the design, operation, and maintenance of camp cars that a railroad uses as sleeping quarters for its employees or MOW workers or both so as to protect the safety and health of those employees and MOW workers and give them an opportunity for rest free from the interruptions caused by noise under the control of the railroad, and provide indoor toilet facilities, potable water, and other features to protect the health and safety of the employees and MOW workers.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       5,096,515
<SECURITIES>                                 1,550,125
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,026,422
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (97,422)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,952,428
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,183,431
<PP&E>                                      19,274,235
<DEPRECIATION>                             (6,886,479)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,159,311
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,785,192
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,065
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,854,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,159,311
<SALES>                                     30,050,405
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,050,405
<CGS>                                       15,460,465
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,544,903
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,281,542)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (332,602)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,659,181
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,814,391
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,844,790
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,844,790
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.71
        

</TABLE>
§ 260.25 Additional information for Applicants not having a credit rating. Each application submitted by Applicants not having a recent credit rating from one or more nationally recognized rating agencies shall include, in the order indicated and identified by applicable numbers and letters corresponding to those used in this section, the following information: ( a ) A narrative statement detailing management's business plan to enhance Applicant's ability to provide rail services including a discussion of the following: ( 1 ) Applicant's current and prospective traffic base, including by commodity and geographic region, major markets served, major interchange points, and market development plans;
( 2 ) Applicant's current operating patterns, and plans, if any, to enhance its ability to serve its current and prospective traffic base;
( 3 ) System-wide plans to maintain equipment and rights-of-way at current or improved levels; and
( 4 ) Specific plans for rationalization of marginal or uneconomic services;
( b ) Detailed financial information, including: ( 1 ) Financial statements prepared by a Certified Public Accountant (audited, if available), for the four calendar years immediately preceding the date of filing of the application, including: ( i ) A copy of Applicant's most recent year-end general balance sheet and a copy of Applicant's most recent unaudited general balance sheet; and
( ii ) Applicant's most recent annual income statement and a spread sheet showing unaudited monthly and year-to-date income statement data up to the date the application is filed;
( 2 ) Projected financial statements, including spread sheets showing for each of the four years subsequent to the year in which the application is filed, both before and after giving effect to the proceeds of the assistance requested in the application: ( i ) Forecasted annual income statement;
( ii ) Forecasted year-end balance sheets. These spread sheets shall be accompanied by a statement setting forth the bases for such forecasts; and
( iii ) A spread sheet showing changes in financial position for the year in which the application is filed, including the period ending on the date of the application based upon actual data and the period from the date of the application to the end of the year, based upon estimated and forecasted data;
( c ) Capital spending plans for the next five years;
( d ) Cash flow projections;
( e ) Contingency plans for termination of the project before completion, if necessary; and
( f ) A narrative description of Applicant's management team, including: ( 1 ) Rail experience of top management;
( 2 ) Management's plans for achieving growth and its long-term capital spending plan; and
( 3 ) A narrative description of Applicant's workforce and the historical rate of employee turnover.
119 STAT. 1998 PUBLIC LAW 109–65—SEPT. 20, 2005

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3669:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

Sept. 8, considered and passed House.

Sept. 12, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–65

109th Congress

An Act

To temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the national flood insurance program.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Flood Insurance Program Enhanced Borrowing Authority Act of 2005’’.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN BORROWING AUTHORITY.

The first sentence of subsection (a) of section 1309 of the

National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is

amended by inserting before the period at the end the following:

‘‘; except that, through September 30, 2008, clause (2) of this sentence shall be applied by substituting ‘$3,500,000,000’ for

‘$1,500,000,000’ ’’.

Approved September 20, 2005.

National Flood

Insurance

Program

Enhanced

Borrowing

Authority Act

of 2005.

42 USC 4001

note.

Sept. 20, 2005

[H.R. 3669]
1

The Honorable William Jay Riley became Chief Judge of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on April 1, 2010.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-2505

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Angel Espinosa-Lozano, also known as *

Angel Espinosa, also known as Angel * [UNPUBLISHED]

Lozano, also known as Manuel *

Corrales-Estrada, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: March 29, 2010

Filed: April 8, 2010

___________

Before RILEY,1

 Chief Judge, BYE and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Angel Espinosa-Lozano (Espinosa) pled guilty to unlawfully reentering the

United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2) and 6 U.S.C.
2

The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota.

-2-

§§ 202(3)-(4), 557. The district court2

 imposed a sentence of 36 months in prison and

3 years of supervised release. On appeal, Espinosa’s counsel has moved to withdraw

and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the

sentence imposed was greater than necessary to satisfy the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

factors. 

Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no abuse of discretion in the

sentence and no indication the district court, in imposing a below-Guidelines-range

sentence, overlooked or misapplied any relevant § 3553(a) factor, or gave significant

weight to an improper or irrelevant factor. See United States v. Stults, 575 F.3d 834,

849 (8th Cir. 2009) (holding a sentence was not unreasonable where the record

reflected the district court made an individualized assessment based on the facts

presented and specifically addressed the defendant’s proffered information in its

consideration of sentencing factors), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 1309 (2010); United

States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (listing the factors that

constitute an abuse of discretion); cf. United States v. Sicaros-Quintero, 557 F.3d 579,

583 (8th Cir. 2009) (according a presumption of reasonableness on appeal to a

sentence at the bottom of the Guidelines range). Finding no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we grant counsel’s motion to

withdraw and we affirm the judgment.

______________________________
#### John McNeary *v.*Herbert D. Chase.

— Motion for reargument denied.
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

May 31, 2019

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 2018-1105

TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, 

INC.,

Appellant

v.

IBG LLC, INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC,

Appellees

UNITED STATES,

Intervenor

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Appeal No. 2018-1302

TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, 

INC.,

Appellant

v.

IBG LLC, INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC,

Appellees
2 TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INT'L v. IBG LLC

UNITED STATES,

Intervenor

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Appeal No. 2018-1438

TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, 

INC.,

Appellant

v.

IBG LLC, INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC,

Appellees

UNITED STATES,

Intervenor

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Appeal No. 2018-1443

TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, 

INC.,

Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, ANDREI IANCU, UNDER 

SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF 

THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK 

OFFICE,

Intervenors
TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INT'L v. IBG LLC 3

Decided: May 21, 2019

Nonprecedential Opinion

______________________

Please make the following changes:

Page 4, Line 9, add --WILLIAM LA MARCA,-- after “THOMAS 

W. KRAUSE”.