alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ta Barbara County 

## Air PollutionControl District November 24, 2014
Carol Sutkus California ARB Air Quality, Planning and Science Division PO Box2815 Sacramento, CA 95812 Re: Santa BarbaraCountyAPCD Our Vision

Clarifications for Rule 810

- Federal Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration (PSD)
Dear Ms. Sutkus, Clean Air

This letter is in reference to Rule 810, Federal Prevention ofSignificantDeterioration (PSD) by the San Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (District). Our agency submitted this rule to the Air Resources Board (ARB) onJune 15, 2013. In the District's transmittal letter, I requested that the package be forwarded to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a revision to the Clean AirAct State Implementation Plan (SIP) for our agency. The package was submitted to the EPA by ARB on February 10, 2014. The EPA has not yet taken action on this SIP submittal. Therecent U.S. Supreme Court decision in UtilityAirRegulatory Group v. EnvironmentalProtectionAgency (No. 12-1146) ("UARG") has implications for a portion ofthis SIP submittal, which we believe will impact the EPA's action on the submittal. On June 23, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in UARG that EPA may nottreat greenhouse gases (GHGs) as an air pollutant for purposes ofdetermining whether a source is a major source required to obtain a PSD permit (referred to as "Step 2 ofthe GHG Tailoring Rule"). DistrictRule 810, Section C, incorporates by reference EPA's PSD regulations at40 CFR 52.21 as in effect on June 20, 2013. This incorporation byreference in DistrictRule 810 includes 40 CFR 52.2l(b)(49)(v), which includes Step 2 of the GHG Tailoring Rule. In light ofthe Supreme Court's UARG decision, I request that you notify EPA that ARB and the District would like to withdraw from the June 20, 2013 SIP submittal the portion ofDistrict Rule 810 that incorporates byreference 40 CFR52.21(b)(49)(v). This withdrawal is designed to ensure thatEPA can act on the District's SIP submittal consistent with the Supreme Court's UARG decision concerning Step 2 of the GHG Tailoring Rule. 

### Ifyou oryour staffhave any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Michael Goldman at (805) 961-8821. Sincerely,

# /~~- DavidVan Mullem Air Pollution Control Officer

\\sbcapcdorg\shares\groups\engr\wp\epa\arb psd rule 810clarification letter for santa barbara county aped.don:
§ 350.201 What is MCSAP? ( a ) *General.* MCSAP is a Federal formula grant program that provides financial assistance to States to reduce the number and severity of crashes, and resulting injuries and fatalities, involving CMVs and to promote the safe transportation of passengers and hazardous materials. The goal of MCSAP is to reduce CMV-involved crashes, fatalities, and injuries through consistent, uniform, and effective CMV safety programs that include driver or vehicle inspections, traffic enforcement, carrier investigations, new entrant safety audits, border enforcement, safety data improvements, and Performance and Registration Information Systems Management (PRISM).
( b ) *MCSAP purpose.* The purpose of MCSAP is to ensure FMCSA and States, local government agencies, other political jurisdictions, Federally-recognized Indian Tribes, and other organizations and persons work in partnership to establish programs to improve motor carrier, CMV, and driver safety to support a safe and efficient transportation system by— ( 1 ) Making targeted investments to promote safe CMV transportation, including transportation of passengers and hazardous materials;
( 2 ) Investing in activities likely to generate maximum reductions in the number and severity of CMV crashes and in fatalities resulting from CMV crashes;
( 3 ) Adopting and enforcing effective and compatible (as defined in § 350.105 of this part) motor carrier, CMV, and driver safety laws, regulations, standards, and orders; and
( 4 ) Assessing and improving State-wide performance of motor carrier, CMV, and driver safety by setting program goals and meeting performance standards, measurements, and benchmarks.
( c ) *State participation.* MCSAP sets conditions of participation for States and promotes the adoption and uniform enforcement of compatible laws, regulations, standards, and orders on CMV safety.
-----Original Message----- 

From: atticuz182@hotmail.com [mailto:atticuz182@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 2:53 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 02, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lionel Mares 

12032 Neenach St 

Sun Valley, CA 91352
#### § 236.763 Locking, latch operated.

The mechanical locking of an interlocking machine which is actuated by means of the lever latch.
-----Original Message----- 

From: IndyKarr@aol.com [mailto:IndyKarr@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:15 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

It's about time for mental health parity. I am writing to support the 

interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental 

Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kari Ward Karr, Ph.D., J.D. 

9214 Las Camas N.E. 

Albuquerque, NM 87111
1 Introduction and Plan Contents

Page 1-20 Petrobras America Inc.

Development Operations Coordination Document

Cascade / Chinook Development Project

1(e) Pollution Prevention Measures

Florida is not an Affected State for the Cascade / Chinook Development Project. As a

result, a discussion of the measures to prevent the discharge of oils and greases from

drilling rigs or platforms during rainfall and routine operations is not required per NTL

2008 G04.

PAI has complied with the requirements of NTL 2010 N 06 which are covered

specifically in Section 9 – Oil Spill Information.

PAI will comply with the requirements of the Drilling Safety Rule and NTL 2010 N 10

with respect to well containment. Supporting documentation will be provided with the

Application for Permit to Drill (APD) subsequent to the approval of this Supplemental

DOCD.

1(f) Additional Safety and Pollution Prevention Measures

PAI utilized this section in the Initial DOCD to summarize a number of additional safety

and pollution prevention features beyond the requirements of 30 CFR 250. In order to

prevent redundancy, these items are bulleted below but the details have been deleted from

this submittal since the primary focus is the drilling of the third well. Those items in the

original list included:

 Subsea Booster Pumps (Technology New to GoM)

 Free Standing Hybrid Risers (Technology New to GoM)

 FPSO – General (Technology New to GoM)

 FPSO - Single Point Mooring System (Technology New to GoM)

 FPSO - Polyester Mooring System (Technology New to GoM)

 FPSO - Torpedo Piles (Technology New to GoM)

Although this item was approved for use, PAI has opted not to utilize Torpedo

Piles for this project.

 Shuttle Vessels (Technology New to GoM)

 FPSO - Offloading to Shuttle Vessels (Technology New to GoM)
-----Original Message-----

From: Peter [mailto:qdawg579@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2015 3:52 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210 – AB32 

Good Day,

My wife has her retirement funds in a 403(b) due to working at a non- profit. The fees are in the 1.4% to 

1.6% range. How can we save enough for retirement when we are losing 1% more than the 0.6% that I 

pay in my 401k. My index funds are at .25%. Her 403(b) doesn't even offer any low cost index funds. 

Index funds should be mandatory, and fees should be capped. 

Please stop unreasonable 12b-1 fees.

Thank you for listening.

Peter Quatrale 

Leominster, MA
#### § 236.713 Bridge, movable.

That section of a structure bridging a navigable waterway so designed that it may be displaced to permit passage of traffic on the waterway.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHigh-frequency techniques for RCS prediction of plate geometriesSeveral different high-frequency methods for modeling the radar cross sections (RCSs) of plate geometries are examined. The Method of Equivalent Currents and a numerically derived corner diffraction coefficient are used to model the RCS of a rectangular, perfectly conducting plate in nonprincipal planes. The Uniform Theory of Diffraction is used to model the RCS of a rectangular, perfectly conducting plate in principal planes. For the soft polarization case, first-order and slope-diffraction terms are included. For the hard polarization case, up to four orders of diffraction are included. Finally, the Uniform Theory of Diffraction for impedance wedges and the Impedance Boundary Condition are used to model the RCS of a coated, rectangular plate in principal planes. In most of the cases considered, comparisons are made between theoretical and experimental results.Document ID19910006899Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBalanis, Constantine A.*(Arizona State Univ. Tempe, AZ, United States)*Polka, Lesley A.*(Arizona State Univ. Tempe, AZ, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-187865NAS 1.26:187865Accession Number91N16212Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-562Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910006899.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### George Armstrong v. The State.

*No. 792.*

*Decided June 22.*

Practice on Appeal—Statement of Facts—Filing of.—Where the court adjourned on the 18th of May, and the statement of facts was filed May 31st, no excuse being given for the delay, *Held,,*the statement of facts can not be considered on appeal, because not filed in the time required by law.

*643Appeal from the District Court of Victoria County. Tried below before Hon. S. F. Grimes.

Appellant was convicted of horse-theft, and his punishment assessed at nine years in the penitentiary.

*George F. Thurmond,*for appellant.

*Mann Trice,*Asssstant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSOH, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of horse-theft, and sentenced to nine years in the penitentiary. The statement of facts can not be considered, because not filed in the time required by law. Court adjourned for the term on the 18th day of May, the statement of facts was filed on the 31st day of May, and there is no excuse given for the delay. Without the evidence we can not revise the action of the court in overruling appellant’s application for a continuance. For the same reason we can not pass upon the appellant’s second and remaining assignment of error, to wit, the insufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. As presented by the record, this judgment must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

*Affirmed.*

Judges all present and concurring.
From: jillasilverman@aol.com [mailto:jillasilverman@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:59 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jill Silverman 

609A Baker St 

Petaluma, CA 94952
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION

 

	Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Moto Photo, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:	August 27, 2002				             /s/ Alfred E. Lefeld
							Name:  Alfred E. Lefeld			
							Title:  	Chief Financial Officer		
 

	The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Nov-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  Aug-31-1996
<CASH>                        1,806,921
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 13,495,176
<ALLOWANCES>                  2,245,176
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              49,827
<PP&E>                        9,819,788
<DEPRECIATION>                1,525,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                21,401,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         822,588
<BONDS>                       000
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    20,578,824
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  21,401,412
<SALES>                       1,909,420
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              2,606,439
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 1,031,201
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              397,182
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               1,178,056
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           1,178,056
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  1,178,056
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 11.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                 11.49
        

</TABLE>
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0771.html[7/21/2015 12:12:12 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-1vnc

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0771

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Gary Burnham

Address:

2434 S Honeysuckle Cir

Mesa, AZ, 85209

General Comment

This is my concern about control of personal retirement accounts (401K, IRA, etc). I have been handling my

 accounts for many years and have not needed any government bureaucrat helping me with investment decisions.

 I don't need your help thank you!
BW \ewtlope

New Hope Treatment Centers
7515 Northside Drive, Suite 200
North Charleston, South Carolina 29420

April 30, 2010

Office of Health Plan Standards and Compliance Assistance
Employee Benefits Security Administration, Room N-5653
U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20210

Attention: RIN 1210-AB30

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Department of Health and Human Services
Attention: CMS-4140-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

File Code: CMS-4140-IFC

New Hope...

Our Name, Our Promise

Telephone 843-572-3498
9394
Referral Fax 843-851-1075
1-800-776-6482
Wwww.newhopetreatment.com

RE: CMS-4140-NC: Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete

Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008

To Whom It May Concern:

New Hope Treatment Centers appreciates the opportunity to respond to the Request for
Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA).

New Hope is a small behavioral health company based out of South Carolina. Our business focus
is psychiatric residential treatment for male and female adolescents, who suffer from significant
mental health impairment. We are often a last stop for many youth who may otherwise be placed
in detention/prison settings, left homeless or worse. As a long-term treatment setting, it is our
mission to address, through evidence-based rehabilitation, the underlying issues that these youth
and their families have been unable to resolve through home-based, community, and acute care
services. We work in conjunction with guardians/families and community programs to establish
support and change in the youth and her/his home well beyond the time the adolescent is in our

care.

With great interest and hope, we have reviewed the MHPAEA and comments submitted by
advocacy groups and insurance companies. As most adolescent psychiatric residential treatment
facilities are primarily Medicaid funded, we looked to the MHPAEA as an opportunity for

Psychiatric Residential Treatment Services
Joint Commission Accredited


families that cannot afford the costs of long-term care, do not qualify for Medicaid, or have
insurance coverage that fails to adequately support psychiatric residential treatment, to finally be
able access what for many youth is a medically necessary level of treatment. Unfortunately, as
acknowledged in the Interim Final Rules, the MHPAEA did not clarify inclusion of residential
treatment services.

We simply ask that in clarifying what is intended by “scope of treatment” that residential
treatment is understood and accepted as vital to a continuum of care by which individuals and
families can be financially supported in accessing necessary care and services.

Thank you for your time and attention to legislation that will currently affect the lives of millions
and for generations to come.

Sincerely,

A De

Eric Baumgartner
Chief Operating Officer

MHPAEA Comment — Page 2

New Hope Treatment Centers
7515 Northside Drive, Suite 200
North Charleston, SC 29420
843.572.3498
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.44

CHIRON                                  

                                       [LETTERHEAD]

March 26, 1997                          
                                         Law Department

Novartis Pharma AG
CH-4002 Basel
Switzerland

Gentlemen:

I refer to that certain Agreement dated as of November 27, 1996 (the 
"Agreement") between Chiron Corporation and Novartis Pharma AG (the successor 
to the pharmaceutical business of Ciba-Geigy Ltd. following its consolidation 
with Sandoz AG).  We propose to amend the second sentence of Section E3, 
entitled "DEBLOCKING", of the Agreement to read in full as follows:

     "Each such payment shall be earned by Chiron on a quarter-by-quarter basis
     in the year in which it is to be paid (and shall be reimbursable to Ciba if
     and to the extent any such payment remains unearned at the effective date
     that Chiron's obligations under sections A and D-1 hereof are terminated
     pursuant to the following sentence."

If this Amendment correctly reflects our mutual understanding, please sign and
return to me a copy of this letter upon receipt of which, this Amendment shall
be effective as of March 27, 1997, for all purposes.  Except as amended hereby,
the Agreement remains in full force and effect.  Section 1, entitled
"Miscellaneous" of the Agreement shall apply to this Amendment.




                                   Very truly yours,

                                   CHIRON CORPORATION
                    
                                   /s/ William G. Green
                                   By:  William G. Green
                                        Senior Vice President & General Counsel


Accepted and Agreed:

NOVARTIS PHARMA AG

By:     /s/ Pierre E. Douaze                  By:   /s/ Herbert Gut
        --------------------                        -------------------
Title:  Head, Executive Committee             Title:  General Counsel
        -------------------------                   ----------------
-----Original Message----- 

From: julietwichell@mac.com [mailto:julietwichell@mac.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:12 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Julie Twichell 

3204 Tremont St 

Berkeley, CA 94703
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

LESTER C. BUCHER, SR., 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 408 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 23rd day of September, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal and Appointment of Counsel are DENIED.
#### § 236.704 [Reserved]