alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0962.html[7/21/2015 6:50:39 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-m4nl

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0962

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Earl Huff

Organization: Freedom Works

General Comment

The EBSA Proposed Rule is more bureacratic from the same ilk of stupid bureacrates that brought socialized

 retirement to America in the first place - aka: SOCIAL SECURITY the taxpayer disaster that dipsticks like you

 seem to love! Keep your hands off the little that I have left of my retirement. I HAVE BEEN ABLE TO SAVE

 FOR MY RETIREMENT BEYOND THE DISASTER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. The pathetic and dispicable

 pitnance that you dole out to me in social security is a disgusting disgrace and a blackeye to bureacratic financial

 "management!" Government shows no ability to manage finances, so butt out of my retirement and back off

 anymore "help" directing my retirement. I AM FULLY CAPABLE OF MANAGING MY RETIREMENT and

 your mucking around will only make it difficult to impossible - but that's probably your goal!

I case I'm not clear - END THE EBSA PROPOSED RULE!
#### The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, *Appellant, v.*The Village of Fishkill Landing, *Respondent.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2180 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2180

 To repeal the Federal charter for the National Education Association.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 3, 1995

  Mr. Dornan (for himself, Mr. Burr, Mr. Largent, Mr. Sam Johnson of 
   Texas, Mr. Weldon of Florida, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Scarborough, Mr. 
Livingston, Mr. Salmon, and Mr. Norwood) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the Federal charter for the National Education Association.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.

    The Act of June 30, 1906 (34 Stat. 804) which granted a Federal 
charter to the National Education Association is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                           1,077,000
<SECURITIES>                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                    3,976,000
<ALLOWANCES>                     (37,000)
<INVENTORY>                      3,343,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 9,158,000
<PP&E>                           21,736,000
<DEPRECIATION>                   (10,275,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   29,250,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            1,980,000
<BONDS>                          0
<COMMON>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                      76,000
<OTHER-SE>                       25,083,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     29,250,000
<SALES>                          14,338,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 14,338,000
<CGS>                            6,781,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    3,796,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 (221,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  3,982,000
<INCOME-TAX>                     1,434,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              2,548,000
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>                     2,548,000
<EPS-BASIC>                    0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                    0.33


</TABLE>
#### § 236.24 Spacing of roadway signals.

Each roadway signal shall be located with respect to the next signal or signals in advance which govern train movements in the same direction so that the indication of a signal displaying a restrictive aspect can be complied with by means of a brake application, other than an emergency application, initiated at such signal, either by stopping at the signal where a stop is required, or by a reduction in speed to the rate prescribed by the next signal in advance where reduced speed is required.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0133

FROM: Scott Christian, Environmental Engineer, OAR/OTAQ/CISD

SUBJECT: Meeting notes for RIN Separation discussion

DATE: September 22, 2011

Location: EPA offices

Attendees:

On phone

Scott Christian, EPA

Tony Miller, EPA

Larry Schafer, National Biodiesel Board

Chad Rathwell, Gavilon

Rob McNaughton, Gavilon

The attendees from Gavilon discussed their comments that were provided to the docket regarding 

the proposed changes to the Title 40 CFR §80.1429.
#### § 29.521 How must a Tribe use surplus or excess Federal property acquired under the Program?

A Tribe must use any property acquired under this section in a manner consistent with the justification submitted at acquisition. The Tribe should notify the Self-Governance Official whenever use of the property changes significantly and upon disposal or sale.
§ 236.589 Relays. ( a ) Each relay shall be removed from service, subjected to thorough test, necessary repairs and adjustments made, and shall not be replaced in service unless its operating characteristics are in accordance with the limits within which such relay is designed to operate, as follows: ( 1 ) Master or primary relays of torque type depending on spring tension to return contacts to deenergized position in noncoded continuous inductive automatic train stop or train control system, at least once every two years; and
( 2 ) All other relays, at least once every six years.
( b ) [Reserved]
[49 FR 3387, Jan. 26, 1984]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSelective removal of organics for water reclamationElectrooxidation is a means of removing organic solutes directly from waste waters without the use of chemical expendables. The feasibility of the concept for oxidation of organic impurities common to urine, shower waters and space habitat humidity condensates was demonstrated. Electrooxidation of urine and waste water ersatz was experimentally demonstrated. The electrooxidation principle, reaction kinetics, efficiency, power, size, experimental test results and water reclamation applications are described. Process operating potentials and the use of anodic oxidation potentials that are sufficiently low to avoid oxygen formation and chloride oxidation are also described. The design of a novel electrochemical system that incorporates a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyte is presented based on parametric test data and current fuel cell technology.Document ID19900014481Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMurphy, Oliver J.*(Texas A&M Univ. College Station., United States)*Hitchens, G. Duncan*(Texas A&M Univ. College Station., United States)*Kaba, Lamine*(Texas A&M Univ. College Station., United States)*Verostko, Charles E.*(NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1990Subject CategoryEnvironment PollutionReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:101890NASA-TM-101890Accession Number90N23797Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG9-350Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014481.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6621** 

SCOTTY E. BOOTHE , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v.
DAVID BALLARD , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Charleston
. Thomas E. Johnston , District Judge. ( 2:14

- cv - 25165 )

Submitted : October 19, 2016 Decided: November 18, 2016

Before KEENAN, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Scotty E. Boothe, Appellant Pro Se. Shannon Frederick Kiser, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Scotty E. Boothe appeals the district co urt’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on Boothe’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The district court granted a partial certificate of appealability (COA), specifying a single issue relevant to the denial of four

o f Boothe’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims as unexhausted but procedurally defaulted: Under [W. Va. Code Ann. § 53

- 4A

- 1(c) (LexisNexis 2016)], may a court apply the statutory rebuttable presumption in favor of a knowing and intelligent waiver of c ertain claims if the petitioner was represented by counsel during the applicable proceedings and fails to argue that the waiver was not voluntary, or must the record nonetheless conclusively demonstrate that the waiver was not voluntary [sic] before a cour t may find that the petitioner waived certain claims? Boothe has not requested that we expand the COA, see 4th Cir. R. 22(a)(2) (governing expansion of COA), and does not address the substance of his remaining claims for relief in his informal brief, see Williams v. Giant Food Inc. , 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004) (deeming issues not raised in appellate brief abandoned on appeal). We have thoroughly reviewed the record in this case and find no reversible error in the district court’s conclusion that , under the facts presented , the statutory presumption under
§ 53

- 4A

- 1(c) would act as a procedural bar to Boothe’s3 unexhausted claims. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the distric t court. Boothe v. Ballard , No. 2:14

- cv - 25165 (S.D. W. Va. Mar. 31, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional proces s.
AFFIRMED
-----Original Message----- 

From: garyjacobs52@aol.com [mailto:garyjacobs52@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:35 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Gary Jacobs 

11408 Lafitte Lane 

Austin, TX 78739
From: smestes1@verizon.net [mailto:smestes1@verizon.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:53 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Margaret estes 

37 winch st 

framingham, MA 01701
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending September 22, 2012

|Filer                               | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|HENDERSON CITIZENS BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A5         | Henderson Citizens Bancshares, Inc., Henderson, Texas, to acquire by merger 100 percent of First White Oak Bancshares, Inc., White Oak, Texas, and indirectly acquire White Oak State Bank, White Oak, Texas. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:10/19/2012
|Newspaper:                          | Not available
|Federal Register:                   | 10/19/2012   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location          | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|SOUTHWEST BK, FORT WORTH, TEXAS | 423458 | 03/19/2012 | 09/28/2012     | S         | Large Bank 
|TRADITION BK, HOUSTON, TEXAS    | 468954 | 04/16/2012 | 09/24/2012     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. (Duke Energy Ohio) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James E. Rogers,
Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy Ohio, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy Ohio.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 12, 2010



/S/    JAMES E. ROGERSJames E. Rogers Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 325
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 325 appear at 66 FR 49869, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 325.59 Measurement procedure; stationary test. In accordance with the rules in this subpart, a measurement shall be made of the sound level generated by a stationary motor vehicle as follows: ( a ) Park the motor vehicle on the test site as specified in § 325.53 of this subpart. If the motor vehicle is a combination (articulated) vehicle, park the combination so that the longitudinal centerlines of the towing vehicle and the towed vehicle or vehicles are in substantial alinement.
( b ) Turn off all auxiliary equipment which is installed on the motor vehicle and which is designed to operate under normal conditions only when the vehicle is operating at a speed of 5 mph (8 kph) or less. Examples of such equipment include cranes, asphalt spreaders, liquid or slurry pumps, auxiliary air compressors, welders, and trash compactors.
( c ) If the motor vehicle's engine radiator fan drive is equipped with a clutch or similar device that automatically either reduces the rotational speed of the fan or completely disengages the fan from its power source in response to reduced engine cooling loads, park the vehicle before testing with its engine running at high idle or any other speed the operator may choose, for sufficient time but not more than 10 minutes, to permit the engine radiator fan to automatically disengage when the vehicle's noise emissions are measured under stationary test.
( d ) With the motor vehicle's transmission in neutral and its clutch engaged, rapidly accelerate the vehicle's engine from idle to its maximum governed speed with wide open throttle. Return the engine's speed to idle.
( e ) Observe the maximum reading on the sound level measurement system during the time the procedures specified in paragraph (d) of this section are followed. Record that reading, if the reading has not been influenced by extraneous noise sources such as motor vehicles operating on adjacent roadways.
( f ) Repeat the procedures specified in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section until the first two maximum sound level readings that are within 2 dB(A) of each other are recorded. Numerically average those two maximum sound level readings. When appropriate, correct the average figure in accordance with the rules in subpart F of this part.
( g ) The average figure, corrected as appropriate, contained in accordance with paragraph (f) of this section, is the sound level generated by the motor vehicle for the purpose of determining whether it conforms to the Standard for Operation Under Stationary Test, 40 CFR 202.21. (Table 1 in § 325.7 lists the range of maximum permissible sound level readings for various test conditions.)
[40 FR 42437, Sept. 12, 1975, as amended at 41 FR 10226, Mar. 10, 1976]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, October 11, 1995 (126), Para 126.27 Adjournment]
[Page 1505]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.126.27  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. WOOLSEY, at 10 o'clock and 43 minutes p.m., the House 
adjourned.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in each Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (file numbers 33-5456, 33-38590, 33-39374, 33-53763 and
33-53899) of CLARCOR Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated January 8, 2002
relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in the Annual
Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
dated January 8, 2002 relating to the financial statement schedule, which
appears in this Form 10-K.

                                         /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 15, 2002
----- Forwarded by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/18/2011 03:11 PM----- 

From: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US 

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Date: 02/01/2011 03:12 PM 

Subject:Cost/ER/Secondary Impacts Memo [appx 2 of 4] 

Cortney, 

2nd of 4 e-mails with the appendices to the Impacts memo. 

Thanks! 

Brian 

(See attached file: A-5.xlsx)(See attached file: A-4.xlsx)
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 OMEGA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 10, 2007
    /s/ Daniel L. WarfelDaniel L. WarfelChief Financial Officer  Page 43
-----Original Message----- 

From: rmulberg@earthlink.net [mailto:rmulberg@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 6:08 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 03, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ruthellen Mulberg 

2265 Captain Kidd Dr. 

Fernandina Beach, FL 32034
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jye-y5yp

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2174

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Logan Martin

General Comment

I do NOT want, nor do I need our government telling me what I can or cannot do with my 

retirement funds. MY MONEY...MY DECISION!! I may be young but I'm not stupid! You guys 

are simply trying to find more ways to take from the people. We are already over taxed and over 

regulated!!!! Also.....I HATE that our constitution is being ignored. WE THE PEOPLE HAVE A 

VOICE! OBAMA AND ALL OF YOU POLITICIANS NEED TO LISTEN. Leave my 401k 

alone.