alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 209.301 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart prescribes the rules of practice for administrative proceedings relating to the determination of an individual's fitness for performing safety-sensitive functions under the Federal railroad safety laws at 49 U.S.C. 20111(c).
( b ) The purpose of this subpart is to prevent accidents and casualties in railroad operations that result from the presence in the work force of railroad employees, including managers and supervisors, and agents of railroads who have demonstrated their unfitness to perform the safety-sensitive functions described in § 209.303 by violating any rule, regulation, order or standard prescribed by FRA. Employees and agents who evidence such unfitness may be disqualified, under specified terms and conditions, temporarily or permanently, from performing such safety-sensitive functions.
( c ) This subpart does not preempt a railroad from initiating disciplinary proceedings and imposing disciplinary sanctions against its employees, including managers and supervisors, under its collective bargaining agreements or in the normal and customary manner. Disqualification determinations made under this subpart shall have no effect on prior or subsequent disciplinary actions taken against such employees by railroads.
[54 FR 42907, Oct. 18, 1989, as amended at 74 FR 23334, May 19, 2009]
## Notification of diseases that may **be confused with vesicular diseases. Years 2008 to 2012.** Month PROVINCEOrigin of denouncementAffected Specie Diagnosis March SANTA FE Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Footrot April SANTA FE Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD) April SANTA FE Denouncement by Government officersBovine Traumatic injury April ENTRE RIOS Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Traumatic injury May CORRIENTESSpontaneous denouncement Bovine Eucalyptus Disease (intoxication by Ramaria flavo-brunnescens fungus) May BUENOS AIRESThird party dennouncement Equine Vesicular Stomatitis was discarded June SANTA FE Third party dennouncement Bovine Footrot August ENTRE RIOS Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Actinomicosis September SANTA FE Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Footrot December JUJUY Spontaneous denouncement Porcine Hidden foot and hoof infection
January SALTA Spontaneous denouncement Ovine Intoxication March MISIONES Third party dennouncement Bovine Infectious Bovine Rinotracheitis (IBR) September JUJUY Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Footrot October JUJUY Spontaneous denouncement Porcine Hidden foot and hoof infection October BUENOS AIRESSpontaneous denouncement Bovine Photosensitization November SALTA Spontaneous denouncement Ovine Contagious ecthyma November BUENOS AIRESSpontaneous denouncement Bovine Photosensitization
January BUENOS AIRESSpontaneous denouncement Bovine Footrot March SALTA Denouncement by Government officersBovine Footrot
April SALTA Spontaneous denouncement Ovine Contagious ecthyma June JUJUY Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Babesiosis November SALTA Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Intoxication November SALTA Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Intoxication December JUJUY Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Inanition. December SGO DEL ESTEROThird party dennouncement Caprine Footrot

March RIO NEGRO Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD) March CORRIENTESSpontaneous denouncement Bovine Footrot June JUJUY Spontaneous denouncement Caprine Contagious ecthyma August CHACO Spontaneous denouncement Caprine Contagious ecthyma September ENTRE RIOS Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Infectious Bovine Rinotracheitis (IBR) September ENTRE RIOS Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Infectious Bovine Rinotracheitis (IBR) October CORRIENTESDenouncement by Government officersBovine Parasitosis

October CORRIENTESDenouncement by Government officersBovine Parasitosis November CHACO Spontaneous denouncement Caprine Contagious ecthyma

March RIO NEGRO Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Photsensitization by unidentified toxic plant ingestion May CORRIENTESSpontaneous denouncement Bovine Eucalyptus Disease (intoxication by Ramaria flavo-brunnescens fungus) September RIO NEGRO Third party dennouncement Bovine IBR/DVB. October ENTRE RIOS Spontaneous denouncement Bovine IBR/DVB. December BUENOS AIRESThird party dennouncement Ovine Contagious Ecthyma 2012 2008

2011 2009

2010
-----Original Message----- 

From: kristin_gearhart@yahoo.com [mailto:kristin_gearhart@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:33 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kristin Gearhart 

3258 Elizabeth St 

Denver, CO 80205
#### § 236.709 Block, absolute.

A block in which no train is permitted to enter while it is occupied by another train.
###### Editorial Note on Part 193

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

#### § 193.2517 Purging.

When necessary for safety, components that could accumulate significant amounts of combustible mixtures must be purged in accordance with a procedure which meets the provisions of the “Purging Principles and Practices (incorporated by reference, *see* § 193.2013)” after being taken out of service and before being returned to service.

[Amdt. 193-2, 45 FR 70405, Oct. 23, 1980, as amended by Amdt. 193-25, 80 FR 183, Jan. 5, 2015]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         168,338
<SECURITIES>                                    24,217
<RECEIVABLES>                                  150,278
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,611
<INVENTORY>                                     48,895
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               686,679
<PP&E>                                       1,173,320
<DEPRECIATION>                                 415,660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,827,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          622,640
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     926,254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,827,682
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               604,810
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  555,533
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   750
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,580
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 48,955
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,678
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,277
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00020-CV

Agbolade Odutayo, Appellant

v.

Richards Memorial Hospital, et al., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY, 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CV32,075, HONORABLE JAN P. PATTERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was due on May 1, 2013. Appellant’s attempts to electronically

file motions for extension of time were rejected on May 20 and June 17, and appellant has not

made any further attempts. Appellant is hereby ordered to file a brief, along with a motion for

extension of time that fully conforms with the rules of appellate procedure and our local rules

governing electronic filling no later than August 26, 2013. No further extensions will be granted,

and a failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of the appeal.

It is ordered August 8, 2013.

Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0354 Directorate ID: 2010-SW-104-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France (EC) Model SA-365N, SA-365N1, SA-366G1, AS-365N2, 

AS 365 N3, EC 155B, and EC155B1 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 30 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: To prevent failure of the main rotor mast and subsequent loss of control of the 

helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $3,100

Labor per Helicopter

(32 x $85/work-hour for 

the inspection)

$2,720

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $5,820

Total US Fleet Cost $174,600

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Gary Roach
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Donald J. Torbert, Jr., certify that:
  1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PAB Bankshares, Inc;2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a.)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a.)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.




Date: May 10, 2004

By:

/s/ Donald J. Torbert, Jr.Donald J. Torbert, Jr.
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer of the registrant)
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.

Leslie C. Abbott

Senior Attorney

919 18 th Street, NW, Suite 600

Washington, D.C. 2000 6

(202) 263

- 628 5

(202) 263

- 6291 Fax

Leslie.abbott @wnco.com

_______________________________________________________________________________

September 25, 2013

Via email

Esta Rosenberg

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Esta.rosenberg@dot.gov

Re: Joint Application of Southwest Airlines and AirTran Airways for

Renewal and Reissuance of Exemption Authority

( US

- Caribbean & US

- Mexico)

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is t o confirm that Southwest Airlines Co. (“Southwest”) has polled all

carriers on the service list s attached to the above

- referenced Application s that were

filed with the Department on September 24, 2013 and there are no objections. We

therefore respectfully request that the Department act on the Applications as soon as

possible.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________ Leslie C. Abbott

cc: Brian Hedberg

Brett Kruger

info@airlineinfo.com
From: Conradt@vetmed.ufl.edu [mailto:Conradt@vetmed.ufl.edu] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 4:52 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Bettina Conrad 

17503 SW 30th Ave 

Newberry, FL 32669
§ 238.707 Override protection. ( a ) *Colliding equipment.* ( 1 ) Using the dynamic collision scenario described in § 238.705(a), anti-climbing performance shall be evaluated for each of the following sets of initial conditions: ( i ) All vehicles in the initially-moving trainset and initially-standing train consists are positioned at their nominal running heights;
( ii ) The lead vehicle of the initially-moving trainset shall be perturbed laterally and vertically upwards by 3 inches at the colliding interface; and
( iii ) The lead vehicle of the initially-moving trainset shall be perturbed laterally and vertically downwards by 3 inches at the colliding interface.
( 2 ) For each set of initial conditions specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, compliance with the following conditions shall be demonstrated after a dynamic impact: ( i ) The relative difference in elevation between the underframes of the colliding equipment in the initially-moving trainset and initially-standing train consists shall not change by more than 4 inches; and
( ii ) The tread of any wheel of the first vehicle of the initially-moving trainset shall not rise above the top of the rail by more than 4 inches
( b ) *Connected equipment override.* ( 1 ) Using the dynamic collision scenario described in § 238.705(a), anti-climbing performance shall be evaluated for each of the following sets of initial conditions: ( i ) All vehicles in the initially-moving trainset and initially-standing train consists are positioned at their nominal running heights;
( ii ) One vehicle is perturbed laterally and vertically upwards by 2 inches, relative to the adjacent vehicle, at the first vehicle-to-vehicle interface in the initially-moving trainset; and,
( iii ) One vehicle is perturbed laterally and vertically downwards by 2 inches, relative to the adjacent vehicle, at the first vehicle-to-vehicle interface in the initially-moving trainset.
( 2 ) For each set of initial conditions specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, compliance with the following conditions shall be demonstrated after a dynamic impact: ( i ) The relative difference in elevation between the underframes of the connected equipment in the initially-moving trainset shall not change by more than 4 inches; and
( ii ) The tread of any wheel of the initially-moving trainset shall not rise above the top of rail by more than 4 inches.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 17, 1995 (129), Para 129.27 H.R. 2353--Unfinished Business]
[Pages 1532-1533]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.129.27  h.r. 2353--unfinished business

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. RIGGS, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced the further unfinished business to be the motion to suspend 
the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 2353) to amend title 38, United States 
Code, to extend certain expiring authorities of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs relating to delivery of health and medical care, and 
for other purposes; as amended.
  The question being put,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill, as amended?

[[Page 1533]]

  The vote was taken by electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

403

affirmative

Nays

0
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, September 19, 1995 (117), Para 117.4 Approval of the Journal]
[Pages 1373-1374]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.117.4  approval of the journal

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. FOLEY, announced he had examined

[[Page 1374]]

and approved the Journal of the proceedings of Monday, September 18, 
1995.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal was approved.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: lppuppers2@gmail.com [mailto:lppuppers2@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:00 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Linda Peterson 

404 Wood Lark Ct. 

Indian Trail, NC 28079
From: fchatman@bellsouth.net [mailto:fchatman@bellsouth.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:22 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Faye Chatman 

1018 Brush Arbor Cir 

McDonough, GA 30252
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 154 (Friday, August 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 45021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3909]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Advisory Council on Dependents' Education

AGENCY:  Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA).

ACTION: Open meeting notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Appendix 2 of 
title 5, United States Code, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given 
that a meeting of the Advisory Council on Dependents' Education (ACDE) 
is scheduled to be held on September 21, 2007, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. 
The meeting will be held at the DoDEA headquarters building, 4040 North 
Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22306. The purpose of the ACDE is to 
recommend to the Director, DoDEA, general policies for the operation of 
the Department of Defense Dependents Schools (DoDDS); to provide the 
Director with information about effective educational programs and 
practices that should be considered by DoDDS; and to perform other 
tasks as may be required by the Secretary of Defense. The meeting 
emphases will be the current operational qualities of schools and the 
institutionalized school improvement processes, as well as other 
educational matters. For further information contact Mr. Jim Jarrard at 
703-588-3121, or at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eea48f838b9dc0a48f9c9c8f9c8aae869fc08a818a8b8fc08b8a9b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="feb49f939b8dd0b49f8c8c9f8c9abe968fd09a919a9b9fd09b9a8b">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 6, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. 07-3909 Filed 8-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>