alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: elphaba816@aim.com [mailto:elphaba816@aim.com] 

Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 7:03 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 01, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Thank you for your time, and have a nice day! 

Sincerely, 

C Wylie 

4155 Mallard Court, #11 

Bettendorf, IA 52722
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          844000
<SECURITIES>                                    197000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1749000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3241000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                34335000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1660000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     515000
<COMMON>                                         20000
<OTHER-SE>                                    28111000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  34335000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2641000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3580000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               35000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (497000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (179000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (676000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: smondaydorsey@yahoo.com [mailto:smondaydorsey@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:52 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sharon Monday-Dorsey 

307 W. Elm #2 

Urbana, IL 61801
Interim Decision #2229 

MATTER OF JIMENEZ 

In Exclusion Proceedings 

A-18272169 

Decided by Board September 24,1973 

Conviction of criminal possession of forgery devices with intent to use them for 

the purpose of forgery (N.Y.) is conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude. 

EXCLUDABLE: Act of 1952—Section 212(a)(9) [8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9A—Prior to entry—convicted of crime involving moral turpitude, to wit: criminal possession of forgery devices. 

ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT: Juan J. Turull, Esquire 

P.O. Box 2099 

.San Juan, Puerto Rico 00903 

This is an appeal from an order of exclusion and deportation 

entered by the immigration judge. The appeal will be dismissed. 

The record relates to a married male alien, a native and citizen 

of Colombia, 42 years of age, who was admitted to the United 

States as an immigrant on July 17, 1968. The applicant last arrived 

at San Juan, Puerto Rico on September 21, 1972 and applied for 

admission as a returning resident. The applicant was paroled into 

the United States pending these exclusion proceedings. He is 

charged with being excludable on the ground that he was convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude prior to entry, to wit, 

criminal possession of forgery devices. The record before us contains a certified copy of the record of conviction, which shows that 

the applicant was convicted in the Supreme Court of the State of 

New York, County of New York, on a plea of guilty on January 14, 

1971. 

On appeal, counsel contends that the conviction should not be 

used as the basis for exclusion because the applicant was not in 

fact guilty. Counsel contends, amoung other things, that the 

. applicant did not know English well enough to enter a meaningful 

guilty plea. Such a collateral challenge to a judgment presents no 

Question which we can consider; the conviction is res judicata on 

the issue of the applicant's guilt. 

442 
Interim Decision #2229 

The applicant further contends that the crime of which he was 

convicted does not involve moral turpitude. We conclude that it 

does. 

Criminal possession has been held to be a crime involving moral 

turpitude when accompanied by intent to commit a crime involving moral turpitude, U.S. ex rel. Guarino v. Uhl, 107 F.2d 339 (C.A. 

2, 1939). In this ease the applicant was convicted on a plea of guilty 

to the charge of criminal possession of forgery devices with intent 

to use them for the purpose of forgery (Ex. 3; pp. B2 & B15). 

Forgery has been held to be a crime involving moral turpitude, 38 

Op. Atty. Gen. 128 (1934); Matter of A-, 5 I. & N. Dec. 52 (B IA 1953); 

Morasch v. INS, 363 F.2d 30 (C.A. 9, 1966); U.S. ex rel. Robinson v. 

Day, 51 F.2d.1022 (C.A. 2, 1931). Thus, the crime of which the 

applicant was convicted involved moral turpitude. The decision of 

the immigration judge was correct. 

ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. 

443
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

# AGENCY:

Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice of membership on the Office of the Secretary Performance Review Board. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 5 U.S.C., 4314(c)(4), Department of Commerce (DOC) announces the appointment of persons to serve as members of the Office of the Secretary (OS) Performance Review Board (PRB). The OS PRB is responsible for reviewing performance Ratings, pay adjustments and bonuses of Senior Executive Service (SES) members. The term of the new members of the OS PRB will expire December 31, 2009. 

*Effective Date:*                         The effective date of service of appointees to the Office of the Secretary Performance Review Board is upon publication of this notice.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Denise A. Yaag, Director, Office of Executive Resources, Office of Human Resources Management, Office of the Director, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482-3600. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The names, position titles, and type of appointment of the members of the OS/PRB are set forth below by organization: 

## Office of the Secretary 2007-2009 Performance Review Board Membership 

### Office of the Secretary 

Tracey S. Rhodes, Director, Executive Secretariat. 

### Office of Assistant Secretary for Administration 

Fred Fanning, Director for Administrative Services. 

Barbara Retzlaff, Director, Office of Budget (Alternate). 

### Bureau of Industry and Security 

Mark M. Foulon, Deputy Under Secretary for Industry and Security. 

### National Institute of Standards and Technology 

W. Todd Grams, Chief Financial Office for NIST. 

### Office of the General Counsel 

Michael A. Levitt, Assistant General Counsel for Legislation and Regulation. 

Joan Maginnis, Assistant General Counsel for Finance and Litigation (Alternate). 

Dated: July 20, 2007. 

Denise A. Yaag, 

Director, Office of Executive Resources. 

[FR Doc. 07-3990  Filed 8-14-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-BS-M
§ 230.111 Spring rigging. ( a ) *Arrangement of springs and equalizers.* Springs and equalizers shall be arranged to ensure the proper distribution of weight to the various wheels of the steam locomotive, maintained approximately level and in a safe and suitable condition for service. Adjusting weights by shifting weights from one pair of wheels to another is permissible.
( b ) *Spring or spring rigging condemning defects.* Springs or spring rigging with any of the following defects shall be removed from service immediately and renewed or properly repaired: ( 1 ) Top leaf broken or two leaves in top half or any three leaves in spring broken. (The long side of a spring to be considered the top.) Broken springs not exceeding these requirements may be repaired by applying clips providing the clips can be made to remain in place;
( 2 ) Any spring with leaves excessively shifting in the band;
( 3 ) Broken coil springs; or
( 4 ) Broken driving box saddle, equalizer, hanger, bolt, or pin.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SOMANETICS CORPORATION AS OF, AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED, FEBRUARY 28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                       1,518,881
<SECURITIES>                                   995,349
<RECEIVABLES>                                  920,002
<ALLOWANCES>                                   153,000
<INVENTORY>                                    748,438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,114,985
<PP&E>                                       1,276,808
<DEPRECIATION>                                 816,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,679,724
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          963,868
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,853
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,673,003
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,679,724
<SALES>                                        803,365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               803,365
<CGS>                                          389,998
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  389,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,645,359
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,173,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,173,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,173,100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1435
DARIN T. STEELE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JESSE BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-96-728-1) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darin T. Steele, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Darin T. Steele appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Title VII complaint as time-barred. We have reviewed the recordand the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Steele v. Brown , No. CA-96-728-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEncoding techniques for complex information structures in connectionist systemsTwo general information encoding techniques called relative position encoding and pattern similarity association are presented. They are claimed to be a convenient basis for the connectionist implementation of complex, short term information processing of the sort needed in common sense reasoning, semantic/pragmatic interpretation of natural language utterances, and other types of high level cognitive processing. The relationships of the techniques to other connectionist information-structuring methods, and also to methods used in computers, are discussed in detail. The rich inter-relationships of these other connectionist and computer methods are also clarified. The particular, simple forms are discussed that the relative position encoding and pattern similarity association techniques take in the author's own connectionist system, called Conposit, in order to clarify some issues and to provide evidence that the techniques are indeed useful in practice.Document ID19900019046Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBarnden, John*(New Mexico State Univ. Las Cruces, NM, United States)*Srinivas, Kankanahalli*(New Mexico State Univ. Las Cruces, NM, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186942MCCS-90-186NAS 1.26:186942Accession Number90N28362Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: AF-AFOSR-0215-88CONTRACT_GRANT: NAGW-1592Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900019046.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 29, 1995 (123), Para 123.29 Hour of Meeting]
[Page 1492]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.123.29  hour of meeting

  On motion of Mr. SHAYS, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That when the House adjourns on Tuesday, October 10, 1995, it 
adjourn to meet at 8 o'clock a.m. on Wednesday, October 11, 1995.
```
#### Will Price v. The State.

*No. 523.*

*Decided January 30.*

Unlawfully Carrying a Pistol—Traveler—Evidence.—See evidence stated in the opinion, upon which it was *Beld,*that the accused was a traveler, and as such not liable to punishment for unlawfully carrying a pistol.

Appeal from the County Court of Johnson. Tried below before Hon. P. B. Adams, County Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for unlawfully carrying a pistol, the punishment being assessed at a fine of $25.

The opinion states the case.

*M. A. Oatis,*for appellant.

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

We are of opinion the evidence does not support the judgment. At the time appellant carried the pistol on his person set out in the indictment, he was a *“*traveler,” in contemplation of law. He had gone from his home in Somervell County to the residence of his father-in-law in Johnson County, about twenty-five miles, for the purpose of accompanying his wife on her return home. He and the witness Bayles had gone down in the wagon belonging to Bayles. Passing through Cleburne, the county site of Johnson County, they reached the residence of appellant’s father-in-law, took dinner, and accompanied by Mrs. Price, appellant’s wife, returned to Cleburne, and loaded the wagon with lumber for Bayles. Appellant then went to market for the purpose of purchasing some barbecued meat for their supper, as they expected to camp for the night a few miles from Cleburne, not being able to reach their home until the following day. While making the purchase of meat, appellant was arrested and placed in jail for carrying the pistol set forth in the indictment. The judgment must be set aside for want of sufficient evidence to support it. McDaniel v. The State (Texas Crim. App.), 26 S. W. Rep., 724; Stilly v. The State, 27 Texas Crim. App., 445; Campbell v. The State, 28 Texas Crim. App., 44.

*Reversed and remanded.*

Judges all present and concurring.
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATIONS








I, Steven R. Staub, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of FirstEnergy Ohio PIRB Special Purpose Trust 2013 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by Ohio Edison Company, as servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, Ohio Edison Company, as servicer, has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.








In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank, National Association, as Certificate Trustee and Indenture Trustee.








Date: March 24, 2023





/s/ Steven R. StaubSteven R. StaubVice President and Treasurer (Senior Officer in Charge of Servicing Function) of Ohio Edison Company, as Servicer under the Phase-In-Recovery Property Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2013, between the Servicer and OE Funding LLC, as the Bond Issuer
§ 235.13 Filing procedure. ( a ) Applications or requests for reconsideration of an application shall be submitted by an authorized officer of the carrier.
( b ) The application and correspondence in reference thereto should be addressed to the Associate Administrator for Safety, Federal Railroad Administration, Washington, DC 20590.
( c ) A separate application shall be filed for each project.
( d ) At a joint facility where changes are proposed in the automatic block signal system, interlocking, traffic control system, automatic train stop, train control, or cab signal system on the tracks of more than one carrier, or if more than one carrier will be affected by the proposed changes or relief sought, a joint application signed by all carriers affected shall be filed.
( e ) Where only one carrier at a joint facility is affected by the discontinuance or modification of the installation or relief sought, it shall be responsible for filing the application. It shall also certify that the other joint carriers have been notified of the filing of its application.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2130-0042) [49 FR 3380, Jan. 26, 1984, as amended at 74 FR 25174, May 27, 2009]
Order entered August 2 , 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00838

- CV

IN RE GAIL NEWTON AND DENNIS NEWTON, Rela t ors

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 4

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 004

- 01623

- 2019



### O RDER

Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Carlyle

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this proceeding for want of

jurisdiction.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE
From: esteffen4@gmail.com [mailto:esteffen4@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:29 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Eileen Steffen 

15780 W. Port au Prince Lane 

Surprise, AZ 85379