alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 236.51 Track circuit requirements. Track relay controlling home signals shall be in deenergized position, or device that functions as a track relay controlling home signals shall be in its most restrictive state, and the track circuit of an automatic train stop, train control, or cab signal system shall be deenergized in the rear of the point where any of the following conditions exist: ( a ) When a rail is broken or a rail or switch-frog is removed except when a rail is broken or removed in the shunt fouling circuit of a turnout or crossover, provided, however, that shunt fouling circuit may not be used in a turnout through which permissible speed is greater than 45 miles per hour. It shall not be a violation of this requirement if a track circuit is energized: ( 1 ) When a break occurs between the end of rail and track circuit connector; within the limits of rail-joint bond, appliance or other protective device, which provides a bypath for the electric current, or
( 2 ) As result of leakage current or foreign current in the rear of a point where a break occurs.
( b ) When a train, locomotive, or car occupies any part of a track circuit, including fouling section of turnout except turnouts of hand-operated main track crossover. It shall not be a violation of this requirement where the presence of sand, rust, dirt, grease, or other foreign matter prevents effective shunting, except that where such conditions are known to exist adequate measures to safeguard train operation must be taken.
( c ) Where switch shunting circuit is used: ( 1 ) Switch point is not closed in normal position.
( 2 ) A switch is not locked where facing-point lock with circuit controller is used.
( 3 ) An independently operated fouling-point derail equipped with switch circuit controller is not in derailing position.
[33 FR 19684, Dec. 25, 1968, as amended at 49 FR 3383, Jan. 26, 1984]
CERTIFICATIONS Exhibit 32.2 I, Christopher
M. Capone, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.
The Annual
  Report on Form 10-K of CH Energy Group, Inc. and Central Hudson
  Gas & Electric Corporation (the Companies) for the period ended
  December 31, 2007 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the
  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
The
  information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies. Date:
February 13, 2008 /s/ Christopher M. CaponeChristopher M. CaponeExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof CH Energy Group, Inc./s/ Christopher M. CaponeChristopher M. CaponeExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Council on Disability

# Type:

Quarterly Meeting “Teleconference Call.” 

# Date and Time:

September 5, 2007, 12 p.m.-2 p.m. 

# Location:

National Council on Disability, 1331 F St., NW., Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004. 

# Status:

September 5, 2007, 12 p.m.-2 p.m.—Open. 

# Agenda:

Opening Remarks, Discussion of Budget Planning for Fiscal Year 2009, Closing Remarks. 

# Sunshine Act Meeting Contact:

Mark S. Quigley, Director of Communications, NCD, 1331 F Street, NW., Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004; 202-272-2004 (voice), 202-272-2074 (TTY), 202-272-2022 (fax). 

# Agency Mission:

NCD is an independent federal agency and is composed of 15 members appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. NCD provides advice to the President, Congress, and executive branch agencies promoting policies, programs, practices, and procedures that guarantee equal opportunity for all people with disabilities, regardless of the nature or severity of the disability; and to empower people with disabilities to achieve economic self-sufficiency, independent living, and inclusion and integration into all aspects of society. 

# Accommodations:

Those needing reasonable accommodations should notify NCD immediately. 

# Language Translation:

In accordance with E.O. 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, those people with disabilities who are limited English proficient and seek translation services for these meetings should notify NCD immediately. 

Dated: August 10, 2007. 

Michael C. Collins, 

Executive Director. 

[FR Doc. 07-4031 Filed 8-14-07; 12:11 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6820-MA-P
-----Original Message----- 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 7:57 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

 

 

April 29, 2010 

 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

 

 

Sincerely, 

 

s. lysaght
#### § 256.9 [Reserved]
Page 1 of 1 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. 809acfla 

Docket: 1RS-2009-01)0& 

Rquest for Intilrmation for Paul Wellstone and Petc Dommici Mcntal Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Conlmcnt On: !RS!290?-OC)?8-000!. 

Request for. I nfon~uatio~~ Kegarding the Paul W el Istone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity 

and Addictiorl Equity Act of 2008 

Dot11 men t : I RS-2009:()(J()X4(),,I_I) 

Comment on FR Doc # EY -09629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Alfked Collins 

Address: 

Anchorage, 

Organization: Alaska Neum/Therapy Center 

General Comment 

Among the thmapeutic tools used by psy~hologists is included biuKeedback and 

EEG neuro feedback (also called EEG biofedback). These techniques are well 

researched, and in many cases (e.g., biofeedback for anxiety, neurofeedback for 

ADHL)) are as well supported by research as are medications. Furthermore, the 

research on working mcrnory training (specifically Cogmed) is also quite 

compelling. Givm that neuro/biof'eedback and wurking memory training arc 

research hmed practices within the practice guidelines of psychologists, they 

should he included in the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity 

and Addi~tivn Equity Act 01' 2008. 

Alfred Collins, Ph.D. 

Licensed Psychologist
#### The People of the State of New York, *Plaintiff, v.*The Third Avenue Savings Bank, *Defendant.*

— Order and judgment affirmed, with costs.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 27, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-30877 Summary Calendar

GERALD W AYNE ZILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the W estern District of Louisiana, Shreveport

USDC No. 5:05-CV-452

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, STEW ART and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Gerald W ayne Zills filed a claim under the Social Security Act for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denied Zills’s claim and the Appeals Council affirmed the decision of the ALJ. Treating the decision of the Appeals Council as the final decision of the Commissioner of SocialSecurity, Zills filed suit in the district court for the W estern District of

Louisiana seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision. Specifically, Zills argues that the ALJ erred by defining “moderate” mental limitations for the vocational expert in a way that implies that one with such limitation can still perform the task satisfactorily. The case was referred to a Magistrate Judge who reviewed the record and briefs submitted by both parties. The Magistrate Judge affirmed the Commissioner’s decision to deny benefits. After considering and denying Zills’ motion to alter or amend the judgment, the Magistrate Judge entered final judgment denying any relief to Zills. Zills appeals to this Court. Our review is limited to determining (1) whether there is substantial evidence in the record as a whole to support the Commissioner’s decision, and (2) whether the Commissioner’s decision comports with relevant legal
standards. Jones v. Apfel , 174 F.3d 692, 693 (5th Cir. 1999). W e have carefully reviewed the briefs, record excerpts, and relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum Ruling, we affirm the decision of the district court to enter final judgment against Zills.
AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000703645
<NAME> SPECIALTY CHEMICAL RESOURCES, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,246,944
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,765,754
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,300,568
<PP&E>                                      18,382,834
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,183,534
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,330,201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,564,978
<BONDS>                                     16,961,716
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       425,710
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,377,797
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,330,201
<SALES>                                     15,736,922
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,736,922
<CGS>                                       12,346,879
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,346,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             720,612
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (375,390)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (375,390)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (375,390)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Everett S. Hiscox et al., as Executors of David Hiscox, Deceased, Appellants. Harriett M. Hughes, Individually and as Executrix of David Hiscox, Deceased, Respondent.

*Matter of Hiscox,*135 App. Div. 848, appeal dismissed.

(Argued January 11, 1911;

decided January 17, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 30, 1909, which modified and affirmed as modified a decree of the Suffolk County Surrogate’s Court directing an amendment of the accounts of the executors herein.

*Robert S. Pelletreau*for appellants.

*Timothy M. Griffing*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
§ 178.337-15 Pumps and compressors. ( a ) Liquid pumps or gas compressors, if used, must be of suitable design, adequately protected against breakage by collision, and kept in good condition. They may be driven by motor vehicle power take-off or other mechanical, electrical, or hydraulic means. Unless they are of the centrifugal type, they shall be equipped with suitable pressure actuated by-pass valves permitting flow from discharge to suction or to the cargo tank.
( b ) A liquid chlorine pump may not be installed on a cargo tank intended for the transportation of chlorine.
[Amdt. 178-89, 54 FR 25018, June 12, 1989, as amended by Amdt. 178-118, 61 FR 51340, Oct. 1, 1996]
§ 210.27 New locomotive certification. ( a ) A railroad shall not operate a locomotive built after December 31, 1979, unless the locomotive has been certified to be in compliance with the Standards.
( b ) The certification prescribed in this section shall be determined for each locomotive model, by either— ( 1 ) Load cell testing in accordance with the criteria prescribed in the Standards; or
( 2 ) Passby testing in accordance with the criteria prescribed in the Standards.
( c ) If passby testing is used under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, it shall be conducted with the locomotive operating at maximum rated horsepower output.
[48 FR 56758, Dec. 23, 1983, as amended at 84 FR 15145, Apr. 15, 2019]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 19-0510

JAMES REAVIS,

 Plaintiff/Appellant,

v.

PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER 

EDUCATION ASSISTANCE 

AGENCY d/b/a FEDLOAN 

SERVICING,

 

Defendant/Appellee.

ORDER GRANTING 

APPELLANT’S SECOND 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

REPLY BRIEF

The Appellant in this matter has moved this Court for an extension of time in 

which to file his Reply Brief. Defendant having no objection to this motion and 

finding good cause therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that Appellant’s Reply Brief in this matter is now due on or 

before April 10, 2020.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 20 2020

03/20/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0510
§ 25.515 Compensation. A recipient shall not make or enforce any policy or practice that, on the basis of sex: ( a ) Makes distinctions in rates of pay or other compensation;
( b ) Results in the payment of wages to employees of one sex at a rate less than that paid to employees of the opposite sex for equal work on jobs the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and that are performed under similar working conditions.
From: Kevin Kaye [mailto:kevinkaye1@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 8:26 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Stop the governmental overreach. This is clearly politically motivated. Wall Street 

failed with Sec 151 and now they are doing an end run to eliminate honest, hard 

working insurance agents from competing in the marketplace.

Kevin Kaye
##### 



Exhibit 3.1 State of DelawareSecretary of StateDivision of CorporationsDelivered 09:58 AM 05/24/2004FILED 08:47 AM 05/24/2004SRV 040378846  2694322 FILE
 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
AMERICA WEST HOLDINGS CORPORATION AMERICA WEST HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
(the Corporation), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY: FIRST:The name of the corporation is America West Holdings Corporation. SECOND:The date on which the Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation was originally filed with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware is December 13, 1996. THIRD:The Board of Directors of the Corporation, acting in accordance
with the provisions of Sections 141 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware, adopted resolutions amending its Certificate of
Incorporation as follows: The first paragraph of Article Four of the Corporations Certificate
of Incorporation shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows: FOURTH AUTHORIZED CAPITAL The total number of shares of all classes of stock which this
Corporation shall have authority to issue is 250,000,000 shares, of which
1,200,000 shares shall be Class A Common Stock (Class A Common Stock)
with the par value of $0.01 per share, 200,000,000 shares shall be Class
B Common Stock (Class B Common Stock)with the par value of $0.01 per
share, and 48,800,000 shares shall be preferred stock (Preferred Stock)
with the par value of $0.01 per share. FOURTH:Thereafter pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors,
such amendment was submitted to the stockholders of the Corporation for their
approval, and was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242
of the General Company Law of the State of Delaware.




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AMERICA WEST HOLDINGS CORPORATIONhas caused this
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation to be signed by its
Chief Financial Officer and attested to by its Secretary this 20th day of May,
2004. AMERICA WEST HOLDINGS CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Derek J. KerrDerek J. Kerr, Chief Financial OfficerATTEST:/s/ Patricia A. PenwellPatricia A Penwell, Secretary
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00644-CR

Elton Anthony BRANCH,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR7555

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. 

SIGNED August 5, 2015.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 50161 C onfer enc e Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. DAVI D ERI C GARC I A D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e W est ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 5: 99- C R
- 22- 1
B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H A M , D E N N IS, an d P R A D O , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * D av i d Er i c G ar c i a ap pe al s f r o m t hr e e c o ns e c ut ive s e nt e nc e s o f 2 4 m o nt hs o f i mp r i s o n me n ti mp o s e df o l l o wi n gr e v o c a t i o n o f h i s s u p e r v i s e dr e l e a s e . H e ar gues t hatt he di st r i c tc our tl ac ked th e a u th ori t y t o o r dert hathi s fede r al s e n t e n c e s r u n c o n s e c u t iv e l yt o a n a s - y e t
- u n i mp o s e ds t a t e s e n t e n c e . H e c o n c e d e s , h o w e v e r , th a t th is a r g u m e n t is fo r e c lo s e d
. S e eUn i t e dSt a t e s v . B r o wn , 9 2 0 F .2 d 1 2 1 2 , 1 2 1 6 -1 7 (5 th C ir . 1 9 9 1 ), ab rogate don ot h er groun d s, Un i t ed S ta tes v. Ca n d ia , 4 5 4 F .3d 4 6 8 , 4 7 2 -7 3 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 6 ). AF F I RMED. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
PUBLIC LAW 112–207—DEC. 7, 2012 126 STAT. 1495 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6634: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012): 

Dec. 5, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–207 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To change the effective date for the Internet publication of certain financial disclosure 

forms. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CHANGED EFFECTIVE DATE FOR FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE 

FORMS OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. 

Section 1(a) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to change the effective 

date for the internet publication of certain information to prevent 

harm to the national security or endangering the military officers 

and civilian employees to whom the publication requirement 

applies, and for other purposes’’, approved September 28, 2012 

(Public Law 112–178; 5 U.S.C. App. 105 note) is amended by 

striking ‘‘December 8, 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘April 15, 2013’’. 

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect on 

December 8, 2012. 

Approved December 7, 2012. 

5 USC app. 105 

note. 

Dec. 7, 2012 

[H.R. 6634] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
§ 234.411 Changes requiring submission of updated information to the Crossing Inventory. ( a ) *Crossing sale.* ( 1 ) If a railroad that is not a primary operating railroad sells all or part of a highway-rail or pathway crossing on or after June 10, 2016, it shall report the crossing sale to the primary operating railroad within three (3) months of the date of sale.
( 2 ) If the primary operating railroad: ( i ) Sells all or part of a highway-rail or pathway crossing on or after June 10, 2016 for which it has reporting and updating responsibility under this subpart; or
( ii ) Is notified of the sale of all or part of a highway-rail or pathway crossing on or after June 10, 2016 under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, then the primary operating railroad shall submit an Inventory Form, or its electronic equivalent, which reflects the crossing sale to the Crossing Inventory consistent with § 234.403 and the Inventory Guide within three (3) months of the date of sale or three months of notification, respectively.
( b ) *Crossing closure.* The primary operating railroad shall report the closure of any highway-rail or pathway crossing that occurs on or after June 10, 2016 to the Crossing Inventory within three (3) months of the date on which the crossing is closed. The primary operating railroad shall submit an Inventory Form, or its electronic equivalent, that reflects closure of the crossing to the Crossing Inventory consistent with § 234.403 and the Inventory Guide.
( c ) *Changes in crossing characteristics.* ( 1 ) The primary operating railroad shall report any change in crossing surface or change in warning device at a public highway-rail grade crossing that occurs on or after June 10, 2016 to the Crossing Inventory within three (3) months of the date of the change. The primary operating railroad shall submit an Inventory Form, or its electronic equivalent, that reflects up-to-date and accurate crossing data for the crossing (including the change in crossing surface or change in warning device) to the Crossing Inventory consistent with § 234.403 and the Inventory Guide.
( 2 ) For purposes of this subpart, a “change in warning device” means the addition or removal of a crossbuck, yield or stop sign, flashing lights, or gates at a public highway-rail grade crossing. The installation of a crossbuck, yield or stop sign, flashing lights, or gates that will be in place for less than six months does not constitute a “change in warning device” for purposes of this subpart.
[81 FR 37533, June 10, 2016]