alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsASTROMAG coil cooling studyASTROMAG is a planned particle astrophysics magnetic facility. Basically it is a large magnetic spectrometer outside the Earth's atmosphere for an extended period of time in orbit on a space station. A definition team summarized its scientific objectives assumably related to fundamental questions of astrophysics, cosmology, and elementary particle physics. Since magnetic induction of about 7 Tesla is desired, it is planned to be a superconducting magnet cooled to liquid helium 2 temperatures. The general structure of ASTROMAG is based on: (1) two superconducting magnetic coils, (2) dewar of liquid helium 2 to provide cooling capability for the magnets; (3) instrumentation, matter-anti matter spectrometer (MAS) and cosmic ray isotope spectrometer (CRIS); and (4) interfaces to the shuttle and space station. Many configurations of the superconducting magnets and the dewar were proposed and evaluated, since those are the heart of the ASTROMAG. Baseline of the magnet configuration and cryostat as presented in the phase A study and the one kept in mind while doing the present study are presented. ASTROMAG's development schedule reflects the plan of launching to the space station in 1995.Document ID19910007500Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsMaytal, Ben-Zion*(Technion - Israel Inst. of Tech. Haifa., United States)*Vansciver, Steven W.*(Wisconsin Univ. Madison, WI, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1990Subject CategorySolid-State PhysicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-187768NAS 1.26:187768Accession Number91N16813Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG5-1417Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910007500.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsJoint US/USSR study: Comparison of effects of horizontal and head-down bed restAn account is given of the results of the first joint U.S./U.S.S.R. bed rest study. The study was accomplished in two parts: A soviet part (May to June 1979) and an American part (July to August 1979). Both studies were conducted under identical conditions and provided a basis for comparison of physiologic reactions and standardizing procedures and methods. Each experiment consisted of three periods: 14 days of pre-bed rest control, 7 days of bed rest, and a 10 to 14 day recovery period. Ten males participated in each study, with five subjects experiencing horizontal bed rest and five subjects a -6 deg head-down body position. Biochemical and hormonal measurements were made of blood and urine, with particular attention to electrolyte metabolism and kidney function; cardio-pulmonary changes at rest and exercise; influence of Lower Body Negative Pressure (LBNP); and incremental exercise using a bicyle ergometer while supine and sitting. Expected moderate changes were noted to occur for various physiologic parameters. Clinical evidence pointed to the fact that head-down bed rest when compared to horizontal conditions more closely matched the conditions seen after manned spaceflight. For the most part, statistically significant differences between the two body positions were not observed.Document ID19900019649Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsSandler, Harold*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Grigoriev, Anatoli I.*(Institute of Biomedical Problems Moscow, Ussr)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1990Subject CategoryAerospace MedicineReport/Patent NumberA-85177NASA-TP-3037NAS 1.60:3037Accession Number90N28965Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 199-21-12Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900019649.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
-----Original Message----- 

From: camaas@aol.com [mailto:camaas@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 7:15 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 02, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

carol maas 

24729 S golfview dr 

sun lakes, AZ 85248
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Bell Atlantic - Virginia, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 33-65152) of our report
dated February 5, 1997, which includes an explanatory paragraph stating that the
Company changed its method of accounting for directory publishing revenues and
expenses in 1996 and discontinued accounting for its operations in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 71, "Accounting for the
Effects of Certain Types of Regulation," effective August 1, 1994, on our audits
of the financial statements and financial statement schedule of the Company as
of December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1995, and for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1996, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



2400 Eleven Penn Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 25, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CHIRON
CORPORATION UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATED SEPTEMBER 30,
1999 AND UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999<F5>
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999<F5>
<CASH>                                         205,768
<SECURITIES>                                 1,347,243<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  197,419
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     95,149
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,276,034
<PP&E>                                         550,858
<DEPRECIATION>                                 232,396
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,474,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          371,192
<BONDS>                                        350,736<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,819
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,685,324<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,474,568
<SALES>                                        308,295
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               569,046
<CGS>                                          138,215
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  138,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               225,958<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                121,451
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,938
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            102,513
<DISCONTINUED>                                  26,297
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   128,810
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69
<FN>
<F1>CONSISTS OF SHORT-TERM AND NONCURRENT INVESTMENTS IN MARKETABLE DEBT
SECURITIES.
<F2>CONSISTS OF CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES AND NOTES PAYABLE, NET OF
CURRENT MATURITIES.
<F3>CONSISTS OF ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL, ACCUMULATED DEFICIT, COST OF TREASURY
STOCK, AND ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS.
<F4>CONSISTS OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, RESTRUCTURING AND REORGANIZATION CHARGES
AND OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES.
<F5>DURING THE FIRST QUARTER OF 1999, THE COMPANY CHANGED ITS FISCAL YEAR FROM
A 52 OR 53-WEEK YEAR ENDING ON THE SUNDAY NEAREST THE LAST DAY IN DECEMBER, TO
A CALENDAR YEAR ENDING ON DECEMBER 31.
</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 245.403 Petition requirements. ( a ) To obtain review of a railroad's decision to deny certification, deny recertification, or revoke certification, a person shall file a petition for review that complies with this section.
( b ) Each petition shall: ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) Be filed no more than 120 days after the date the railroad's denial or revocation decision was served on the petitioner, except as provided for in paragraph (d) of this section;
( 3 ) Be filed on *https://www.regulations.gov .*
( 4 ) Include the following contact information for the petitioner and petitioner's representative (if petitioner is represented): ( i ) Full name;
( ii ) Daytime telephone number; and
( iii ) Email address;
( 5 ) Include the name of the railroad;
( 6 ) Contain the facts that the petitioner believes constitute the improper action by the railroad and the arguments in support of the petition; and
( 7 ) Include all written documents in the petitioner's possession or reasonably available to the petitioner that document the railroad's decision.
( c ) If requested by the Board, the petitioner must provide a copy of the information under 49 CFR 40.329 that laboratories, medical review officers, and other service agents are required to release to employees. The petitioner must provide a written explanation in response to a Board request if written documents, that should be reasonably available to the petitioner, are not supplied.
( d ) The Board may extend the petition filing period in its discretion provided that the petitioner provides good cause for the extension and: ( 1 ) The request for an extension is filed before the expiration of the period provided for in paragraph (b)(2) of this section; or
( 2 ) The failure to timely file was the result of excusable neglect.
( e ) A party aggrieved by a Board decision to deny a petition as untimely or not in compliance with the requirements of this section may file an appeal with the Administrator in accordance with § 245.411.
-----Original Message----- 

From: witching9green@yahoo.com [mailto:witching9green@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:24 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Carole Plourde 

70 Cedar St 

Amesbury, MA 01913
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, October 12, 1995 (127), Para 127.36 Private Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1527]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.127.36  private bills and resolutions

  Under clause 1 of rule XXII, private bills and resolutions were 
introduced and severally referred as follows:

           By Mr. METCALF:
       H.R. 2478. A bill for the relief of the Sara, Jade, and 
     Jordan Hutchings; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
           By Mr. ROSE:
       H.R. 2479. A bill for the relief of James A. Strickland; to 
     the Committee on the Judiciary.
```
```

[109th Congress Public Law 39]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ039.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 409]]

Public Law 109-39
109th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
 Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003. <<NOTE: July 27, 2005 -  [H.J. Res. 
                                 52]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: 50 USC 1701 
note.>> That Congress approves the renewal of the import restrictions 
contained in section 3(a)(1) of the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 
2003.

    Approved July 27, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 52 (S.J. Res. 18):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109-101 accompanying S.J. Res. 18 (Comm. on 
Finance).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            June 21, considered and passed House.
            July 19, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: billiestockton@insightbb.com 

[mailto:billiestockton@insightbb.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:24 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Billie Stockton 

328 Darenia Lane 

Lexington, KY 40511
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- ) ) Allen Wright Enterprises, Inc./Hamp's )

Construction, LLC, A Joint Venture ) ) Under ContractNo. W9I2P8-08-D-0048 ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 60764, 60765, 60766 60767,60768

John I. Hulse, IV, Esq.

Conroy Law Firm Metairie, LA Thomas J. Warren, Esq.

Acting Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Judith E. Almerico, Esq. Stephan C. Roth, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. Army Engineer District, New Orleans ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 13 February 2018



### ~WSOM Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCANos. 60764, 60765, 60766, 60767, 60768, Appeals ofAllen Wright Enterprises, Inc./Hamp's Construction, LLC, A Joint Venture, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
EXHIBIT
21.2
 
 
 THE CLEVELAND
ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY
 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
OF THE REGISTRANT
 AT DECEMBER 31,
2006
 
 
 
 Name Of
      Subsidiary
    
    Business
    
    State of
      OrganizationCenterior
      Funding Corporation
    
    Special-Purpose
      Finance
    
    DelawareCleveland
      Electric Financing Trust I
    
    Special-Purpose
      Finance
    
    DelawareShippingport
      Capital Trust
    
    Special-Purpose
      Finance
    
    Delaware
 
 
 
 Exhibit Number 21,
List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant at December 31, 2006, is not included in
the printed document.
#### § 236.560 Contact element, mechanical trip type; location with respect to rail.

Contact element of automatic train stop device of the mechanical trip type shall be maintained at a height above the plane of the tops of the rails, and at a horizontal distance from the gage side of the rail, in accordance with specifications of the carrier.

[49 FR 3387, Jan. 26, 1984]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Sterling Gas Drilling Fund 1982 (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles E. Drimal Jr., Chief Executive Officer of PrimeEnergy Management Corporation, the Managing General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

/s/ Charles E. Drimal Jr.

-----------------------------

Chief Executive Officer

August 10, 2005

 

 

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Sterling Gas Drilling Fund 1982 (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Beverly A. Cummings, Chief Financial Officer of PrimeEnergy Management Corporation, the Managing General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

/s/ Beverly A. Cummings

------------------------------

Chief Financial Officer

August 10, 2005
§ 230.32 Time and method of inspection. ( a ) *Time of inspection.* The entire boiler shall completely be inspected at the 1472 service day inspection. The jacket, lagging and any other components interfering with the provision of inspection access shall be removed at this time. Those portions of the boiler that are exposed and able to be inspected as required by the daily, 31service day, annual and fifth annual inspections shall be inspected at those times. The interior of the boiler also shall be inspected at each annual inspection, after the completion of any hydrostatic test above MAWP, and whenever a sufficient number of flues are removed to allow examination. The jacket, lagging and any other components shall also be removed to provide inspection access whenever the FRA inspector, or the steam locomotive owner and/or operator, considers it necessary due to identifiable safety concerns.
( b ) *Method of inspection* — ( 1 ) *Entire boiler.* During the 1472 service day inspection, the entire boiler shall be examined for cracks, pitting, grooving, or indications of overheating and for damage where mud has collected, or heavy scale formed. The edges of plates, all laps, seams, and points where cracks and defects are likely to develop, shall be thoroughly inspected. Rivets shall be inspected for corrosion and looseness.
( 2 ) *Boiler interior.* When inspecting the boiler interior, it must be seen that braces and stays are taut, that pins are properly secured in place, and that each is in condition to support its proportion of the load. Washout plugs shall be removed for access and visual inspection of the water side of the firebox sheets. Washout plug threads, sleeves and threaded openings shall be examined at this time.
( 3 ) *Boiler exterior.* A thorough inspection shall be made of the entire exterior of the boiler while under hydrostatic pressure.
Exhibit 32.1

CHIRON CORPORATION

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report ofCHIRON CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation(the "Company"), on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,HOWARD H. PIEN, Chief
Executive Officerof the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the
best of my knowledge:

This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

|Date: November 2, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ HOWARD H. PIENHOWARD H. PIEN
President and Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–278 

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 2419, ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2006 

NOVEMBER 8, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 539] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 539, by a nonrecord vote, reports the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report to accompany H.R. 2419, Energy and Water Development 

Appropriations Act, 2006, and against its consideration. The rule 

further provides that the conference report shall be considered as 

read. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the conference report includes a waiver of clause 8 of rule XXII (requiring 

a three-day layover of conference reports and the accompanying 

joint explanatory statement), which is necessary because the conference report (H. Rept. 109–275) was not filed until Monday, November 7, 2005, and the conference report may be considered by 

the House as early as Wednesday, November 9, 2005. 

Æ