alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, October 12, 1995 (127), Para 127.32 Leave of Absence]
[Page 1527]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.127.32  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--
  To Mr. BALDACCI, today before 4 p.m.;
  To Mr. BILIRAKIS, today after 1:30 p.m. and balance of the week; and
  To Mr. EMERSON, after 12:30 p.m today.
  And then,
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2258 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2258

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
             coastwise trade for the vessel RAFFLES LIGHT.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 4, 1995

  Mr. Zeliff introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
             coastwise trade for the vessel RAFFLES LIGHT.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel RAFFLES LIGHT (United 
States official number 501584).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit32

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Chief Consolidated Mining Company(the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-KSB for the periodended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’),the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

Date:    November30, 2006

|        |  |  |                                                                       |
|--------|--|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  |  | /s/Richard R.Schreiber                                 |
|   |  |  | RichardR. Schreiber Interim Principal Executive and AccountingOfficer |
|        |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1823 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 1823

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 1996

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend the Central Utah Project Completion Act to direct the 
    Secretary of the Interior to allow for prepayment of repayment 
    contracts between the United States and the Central Utah Water 
 Conservancy District dated December 28, 1965, and November 26, 1985, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PREPAYMENT OF CERTAIN REPAYMENT CONTRACTS BETWEEN THE UNITED 
              STATES AND THE CENTRAL UTAH WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT.

    Section 210 of the Central Utah Project Completion Act (106 Stat. 
4624) is amended by striking the second sentence and inserting the 
following: ``The Secretary shall allow for prepayment of the repayment 
contract between the United States and the Central Utah Water 
Conservancy District dated December 28, 1965, and supplemented on 
November 26, 1985, providing for repayment of municipal and industrial 
water delivery facilities for which repayment is provided pursuant to 
such contract, under terms and conditions similar to those contained in 
the supplemental contract that provided for the prepayment of the 
Jordan Aqueduct dated October 28, 1993. The prepayment may be provided 
in several installments to reflect substantial completion of the 
delivery facilities being prepaid and may not be adjusted on the basis 
of the type of prepayment financing utilized by the District. The 
District shall exercise its right to prepayment pursuant to this 
section by the end of fiscal year 2002. Nothing in this section 
authorizes or terminates the authority to use tax exempt bond financing 
for this prepayment.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 30, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Placeholder: confidential business information item 

Non-redacted MBIP comment to EPA 

For more information please contact Jeremy Arling by phone at 202-343-9055 or by 

email at arling.jeremy@epa.gov
R. Patrick Thornberry Associate r.patrick.thornberry@FaegreBD.com Direct +1 317 569 4625 Faegre Baker Daniels LLP 600 East 96 th Street Suite 600 Indianapolis Indiana 46240-3789 Phone +1 317 569 9600 Fax +1 317 569 4800

US.75941098.01 July 30, 2015
United States Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590

Re: Docket ID: FAA-2015-1755

Dear Sir or Madam: In response to an email received from the Federal Aviation Administration on July 29, 2015 (the "Supplemental Request"), requesting additional information regarding the aircrafts to be used for CameraBee, LLC's ("CameraBee") proposed unmanned aircraft system ("UAS") operations, CameraBee submits this letter to supplement its original exemption request. CameraBee proposes the use of the following UAS aircraft in connection with its proposed UAS operations:
1. Make: Hoverfly Systems/Aeronavics, Model: Er ista 8/Skyjib 8, Type: Rotorcraft, Maximum Weight: 42 lbs
2. Make: Hoverfly Systems/ SkyHero, Model: Spyder 700 Quad, Type: Rotorcraft, Maximum Weight: 9lbs
3. Make: Freefly Systems, Model: Alta, T ype: Rotorcraft, Maximum Weight: 30lbs
4. Make: Blade, Model: 350QX, Type: Rotorcraft, Maximum Weight: 24 oz In addition to the foregoing, CameraBee will simu ltaneously submit a copy of its Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual in accordance with the submission instructions for proprietary information provided in the Supplemental Request.-2- July 30, 2015

US.75941098.01 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ R. Patrick Thornberry R. Patrick Thornberry
RPTHORNB:
cc: Derek Hammer President, CameraBee, LLC
§ 178.33a-4 Duties of inspector. ( a ) To inspect material and completed containers and witness tests, and to reject defective materials or containers.
( b ) [Reserved]
[Order 71, 31 FR 9074, July 1, 1966. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967]
#### Elisha M. Shurtleff, Respondent, v. The Utica and Black River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Declined to hear, but leave granted to appellant to apply to Special Term for relief.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 25, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-644

Lower Tribunal No. F01-25909

________________

Robert Jackson, a/k/a Eldwin Gelin,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, 

Appellee.

An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(3) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Teresa Pooler, Judge.

O’Brien Hatfield Reese P.A., and Rachael E. Reese (Tampa), for 

appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Jones v. State, 591 So. 2d 911, 915 (Fla. 1991) (“[I]n 

order to provide relief, the newly discovered evidence must be of such nature 

that it would probably produce an acquittal on retrial.”); Jones v. State, 709 

So. 2d 512, 521 (Fla. 1998) (“[T]he trial court should initially consider whether 

the evidence would have been admissible at trial or whether there would 

have been any evidentiary bars to its admissibility.”); Blanco v. State, 702 

So. 2d 1250, 1252 (Fla. 1997) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting 

Demps v. State, 462 So. 2d 1074, 1075 (Fla. 1984)) (“As long as the trial 

court’s findings are supported by competent substantial evidence, ‘this Court 

will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court on questions of fact, 

likewise of the credibility of the witnesses as well as the weight to be given 

to the evidence by the trial court.’”); Marek v. State, 14 So. 3d 985, 995 (Fla. 

2009) (holding declarant’s statement not so far contrary to his pecuniary or 

proprietary interest when made many years after trial and statute of 

limitations had run); § 90.804(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“‘Unavailability as a 

witness’ means that the declarant: . . . Persists in refusing to testify 

concerning the subject matter of the declarant’s statement despite an order 

of the court to do so . . . .”); § 90.804(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (“A statement tending 

to expose the declarant to criminal liability and offered to exculpate the 
3

accused is inadmissible, unless corroborating circumstances show the 

trustworthiness of the statement.”).
exv10w8



 








Exhibit 10.8




March 14, 2006




Stan Tusman



Dear Stan:




     [Introductory language regarding 2005 results, omitted. The Company undertakes to furnish a
supplemental copy of such language to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.]



     The bonus plan for 2006 is based on the profit after-tax using a standard corporate tax rate.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	15%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	3,000,000	 
	22.5%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	4,000,000	 
	30%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	5,500,000	 
	37.5%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	6,955,000	 
	50%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	8,375,000	 
	62.5%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	9,700,000	 
	75%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	11,000,000	 






     In addition, you will earn 12.5% of your cumulative salary if, in my opinion, you have met the
criteria outlined on the attached.



     The bonus period will be the fiscal months of February 2006 through January 2007. You must be
an active employee of Bakers Footwear Group at the time bonuses are paid to be eligible to receive
your bonus.



     We are excited about our business in the coming year. We hope it is profitable for all of our
shareholders and us.



	 	 	 
	 

	 	Sincerely,
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ Peter Edison
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Peter Edison






ss



[Attachment, regarding 2006 goals and objectives, omitted. The Company undertakes to furnish a
supplemental copy of such attachment to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.]
-----Original Message----- 

From: coachindra@gmail.com [mailto:coachindra@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 3:44 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Indra Dabolins 

2100 Glenview Ave. 

Park Ridge, Il 6068 

Sincerely, 

Indra Dabolins 

2100 Glenview Ave 

Park RIdge, IL 60068
From: tolberthill@att.net [mailto:tolberthill@att.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2015 5:58 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32 EBSA

Dear Sir or Madam:

I fully support the proposed EBSA rulemaking which will adopt new ERISA guidance to protect 

US citizens and their retirement plans from financial advice given to them by advisors not acting 

in the best interest of the consumer. These new rules will cover the broader array of plans now 

used by most Americans.

I had a modest amount of funds in an IRA with a major US investment firm (along with other 

non-retirement investments). I had the IRA for 12 years. I always felt that my advisor gave me 

honest suggestions that were in my best interest. In January 2014, the advisor told me in a 

roundabout way that I (and my wife and her separate accounts) should look for another firm for 

our investments. My gut feeling was that we were not investing in higher risk (more profit for 

the firm) investments. I think that my wife and I were not producing enough profit for the firm 

and were asked to leave. I think that kind of profit pressure steers advisors in directions other 

than what their clients need to do with their life savings. The new ERISA fiduciary proposed 

rules would help ensure that consumers receive retirement advice that they can trust.

Thank you very much.

David Hill

Graham, NC
§ 25.525 Fringe benefits. ( a ) *“Fringe benefits” defined.* For purposes of these Title IX regulations, *fringe benefits* means: Any medical, hospital, accident, life insurance, or retirement benefit, service, policy or plan, any profit-sharing or bonus plan, leave, and any other benefit or service of employment not subject to the provision of § 25.515.
( b ) *Prohibitions.* A recipient shall not: ( 1 ) Discriminate on the basis of sex with regard to making fringe benefits available to employees or make fringe benefits available to spouses, families, or dependents of employees differently upon the basis of the employee's sex;
( 2 ) Administer, operate, offer, or participate in a fringe benefit plan that does not provide for equal periodic benefits for members of each sex and for equal contributions to the plan by such recipient for members of each sex; or
( 3 ) Administer, operate, offer, or participate in a pension or retirement plan that establishes different optional or compulsory retirement ages based on sex or that otherwise discriminates in benefits on the basis of sex.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, September 12, 1995 (113), Para 113.17 Employee Benefit Plans]
[Page 1324]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.113.17  employee benefit plans

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, pursuant to House Resolution 215 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the consideration of the bill 
(H.R. 1594) to place restrictions on the promotion by the Department of 
Labor and other Federal agencies and instrumentalities of economically 
targeted investments in connection with employee benefit plans.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, by unanimous consent, designated 
Mr. EMERSON as Chairman of the Committee of the Whole; and after some 
time spent therein,
```
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Independence Holding Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy T. K. Thung, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   May 17, 2010   /s/ Roy T.K. Thung* Roy T. K. Thung Chief Executive Officer and President   * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT  21.1

  SUBSIDIARY CORPORATIONS OF CHESAPEAKE CORPORATION

  December 31, 1997


                                                 State of
                  Name                         Incorporation

  Cary St. Company                               Delaware

  The Chesapeake Corporation of Virginia         Virginia

  Chesapeake Display and Packaging Company       Iowa

  Chesapeake Forest Products Company             Virginia

  Chesapeake Packaging Co.                       Virginia

  Chesapeake Recycling Co.                       Virginia

  Chesapeake Resources Company                   Virginia

  Chesapeake Trading Corp.                       Virginia

  Chesapeake Trading Company, Inc.               U. S. Virgin Islands

  Chesapeake Building Products Company           Virginia

  Color-Box, Inc.                                Indiana

  Delmarva Properties, Inc.                      Virginia

  Stonehouse Inc.                                Virginia

  Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc.                    Delaware

  Chesapeake International Holding Company       Virginia

  Wisconsin Tissue de Mexico S.A. de C.V.        Mexico

  Chesapeake Display and Packaging
   (Canada) Limited                              Ontario, Canada

  Chesapeake Europe S.A.                         France

  Sailliard PLV                                  France

  Raab-Pige                                      France

  Chesapeake Coffrets                            France

  Plastiphane                                    France
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Performancemeasures of effectiveness: ... report.**** 
SuDoc:PREX 26.1/2:
ItemNumber: 0857-R-03
CGPsystem Number: 000502699
 
2000
2001
2002
 
 
 **
Docket: CMS-2009-0040 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: CMS-2009-0040-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: CMS-2009-0040-0017 

NE-Brad Wilke 

Submitter Information 

Name: Brad Wilke 

Address: 

Lincoln, NE, 68516 

General Comment 

I am very glad they passed the mental health parity law. 

I am disabled and only have medicare for mental heath coverage . 

This only covers 50% outpatient which I can't afford very often. I realize they are 

going to increase this by 5% each year starting in 2010 I believe until it reaches 

80% coverage. This is good but wish it would be sooner and faster for medicare 

like it is going to be for the private insurance.

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 12, 2009 

Received: May 06, 2009 

Status: Posted 

Posted: May 11, 2009 

Category: Individual 

Tracking No. 80978e6c 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         6515000
<SECURITIES>                                  13200000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3361000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (45000)
<INVENTORY>                                    1545000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              24711000
<PP&E>                                         3012000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (1851000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                27827000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           748000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      26939000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (13000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  27827000
<SALES>                                        2670000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2670000
<CGS>                                           993000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1859000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (3000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (271000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  92000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     35000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              57000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     57000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
```

[112th Congress Public Law 221]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 1601]]

Public Law 112-221
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
6083 Highway 36 West in Rose Bud, Arkansas, as the ``Nicky `Nick' Daniel 
      Bacon Post Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 28, 2012 -  [H.R. 3870]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. NICKY ``NICK'' DANIEL BACON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 6083 Highway 36 West in Rose Bud, Arkansas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Nicky `Nick' Daniel Bacon Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Nicky 
`Nick' Daniel Bacon Post Office''.

    Approved December 28, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3870:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            July 23, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 19, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```