alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 238.411 Rear end structures of power car cabs. The rear end structure of the cab of a power car shall be designed to include the following elements, or their structural equivalent. (A conceptual implementation of this end structure is provided in Figure 2 to this subpart.) ( a ) *Corner posts.* The rear end structure shall have two full-height corner posts, or their structural equivalent, each capable of withstanding the following: ( 1 ) A horizontal, longitudinal or lateral shear load of 300,000 pounds at its joint with the underframe without exceeding the ultimate strength of the joint; and
( 2 ) A horizontal, longitudinal or lateral shear load of 80,000 pounds at its joint with the roof without exceeding the ultimate strength of the joint.
( b ) *Collision posts.* The rear end structure shall have two full-height collision posts, or their structural equivalent, each capable of withstanding the following: ( 1 ) A horizontal, longitudinal shear load of 500,000 pounds at its joint with the underframe without exceeding the ultimate strength of the joint; and
( 2 ) A horizontal, longitudinal shear load of 75,000 pounds at its joint with the roof without exceeding the ultimate strength of the joint.
[64 FR 25660, May 12, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 19991, Apr. 23, 2002]
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
BRIAN K. NEWSOME, Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE TR EASURY, Respondent

______________________

2015

- 3167

______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. AT

- 0752

- 15

- 0179 -I- 1.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

D ANIEL C RAIG C OOLEY , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LL P, Reston, VA, argued for petitioner. Also represented by J. D EREK M C C ORQUIN

DALE ; J AMES R. B ARNEY
, J ASON L EE R OMRELL
, Washin gton, DC.

R YAN M AJERUS
, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United S tates Department of Justice, Washin gton, DC, argued for respondent . Also represented by B ENJAMIN C. M IZER , R OBERT E. K IRSCHMAN
, J R ., D EBORAH A. B YNUM

.______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (M OORE
, O’M ALLEY
, and H UGHES
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

May 4 , 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                            2185
<SECURITIES>                                     16857
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4500
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (35)
<INVENTORY>                                       1849
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 25622
<PP&E>                                            4087
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2281)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   30505
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2474
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         27912
<OTHER-SE>                                         (9)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     27903
<SALES>                                           4004
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4004
<CGS>                                             1668
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2096
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (2)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (275)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    517
<INCOME-TAX>                                       196
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                321
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       321
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2265 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2265

    To prohibit the regulation of any tobacco products, or tobacco 
sponsored advertising, used or purchased by the National Association of 
  Stock Car Automobile Racing, its agents or affiliates, or any other 
 professional motor sports association by the Secretary of Health and 
 Human Services or any other instrumentality of the Federal Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 6, 1995

Mr. Funderburk (for himself, Mr. Hilleary, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Boehner, Mr. 
  Browder, Mr. Baesler, Mr. Jones, Mr. Taylor of North Carolina, Mr. 
 Ballenger, Mr. Coble, Mr. Scott, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Quillen, 
 Mr. Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. Graham, Mr. Mica, Mr. Gordon, Mr. Rogers, 
 Mr. Burr, Mr. Heineman, Mr. Souder, Mr. Hostettler, Mr. McIntosh, Mr. 
  Chambliss, Mr. Barr, Mr. Kingston, Mr. Collins of Georgia, and Mr. 
Bryant of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                      to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the regulation of any tobacco products, or tobacco 
sponsored advertising, used or purchased by the National Association of 
  Stock Car Automobile Racing, its agents or affiliates, or any other 
 professional motor sports association by the Secretary of Health and 
 Human Services or any other instrumentality of the Federal Government.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services or any other official or 
instrumentality of the Federal Government shall not regulate the use of 
tobacco or tobacco products, used or purchased by the National 
Association of Stock Car Automobile Racing, its agents or affiliates, 
or any other professional motor sports association under the Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and shall not take any action with respect 
to tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco advertising used by the 
National Association of Stock Car Automobile Racing, its agents or 
affiliates, or any other professional motor sports association under 
the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act or the Comprehensive 
Smokeless Tobacco Health and Education Act of 1986.
                                 <all>
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2361

To amend the commencement dates of certain temporary Federal judgeships.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 19, 1995

Mr. MOORHEAD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the commencement dates of certain temporary

Federal judgeships.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMMENCEMENT DATE OF TEMPORARY

4 JUDGESHIPS.

5 Section 203(c) of the Judicial Improvements Act of

6 1990 (Public Law 101–650; 104 Stat. 5101; 28 U.S.C.

7 133 note) is amended by striking out the last sentence

8 and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘The first vacancy in the of9 fice of district judge in each of the judicial districts named

10 in this subsection, except the western district of Michigan,

11 occurring 5 years or more after the confirmation date of
2

•HR 2361 IH

1 the judge named to fill a temporary judgeship created by

2 this Act, shall not be filled. The first vacancy in the office

3 of district judge in the western district of Michigan, occur4 ring after December 1, 1995, shall not be filled.’’.

Æ
#### § 198.61 How is a State notified of PHMSA's final decision?

PHMSA will issue a final decision on whether the State's damage prevention enforcement program has been found inadequate in accordance with 49 CFR 190.5.
-----Original Message----- 

From: jamess@ucsc.edu [mailto:jamess@ucsc.edu] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 12:52 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

James Schoonover 

10699 Empire Grade 

Santa Cruz, CA 95060
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DEBORAH WESSELMAN, §

§ No. 26, 2017

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellant, §

§ Court Below: Superior Court

v. § of the State of Delaware

§

CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH § C.A. No. N15C-04-127 CEB

SERVICES, INC., §

§

Defendant Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: September 13, 2017

Decided: September 18, 2017

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.

O R D E R

This 18th day of September 2017, it appears to the Court that the judgment 

of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned 

in its bench opinion and order dated December 16, 2016.

1

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice

 

1 Wesselman v. Christiana Care Health Servs., Inc., C.A. No. N15C-04-127 (Super. Ct. Dec. 16, 

2016).
#### Bartholomew Moynahan, Respondent, *v.*The City of New York, Appellant.

Reported below, 140 App. Div. 911.

(Argued January 3, 1911;

decided January 10, 1911.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 28, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court in an action to recover for services as stenographer in the Supreme Court.

The motion was made upon the ground that the action was one for services, the decision of the Appellate Division unanimous and the appeal frivolous.

*572
      *L. Laflin Kellogg*for motion.

*Archibald R.*Watson, *Corporation Counsel (Clarence L. Barber*of counsel), opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs, because the services were rendered by a public officer under the obligation of official duty.
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.557 Which pipelines must have coating for external corrosion control? Except bottoms of aboveground breakout tanks, each buried or submerged pipeline must have an external coating for external corrosion control if the pipeline is— ( a ) Constructed, relocated, replaced, or otherwise changed after the applicable date in § 195.401(c), not including the movement of pipe covered by § 195.424; or
( b ) Converted under § 195.5 and— ( 1 ) Has an external coating that substantially meets § 195.559 before the pipeline is placed in service; or
( 2 ) Is a segment that is relocated, replaced, or substantially altered.
#### § 229.57 Foundation brake gear.

A lever, rod, brake beam, hanger, or pin may not be worn through more than 30 percent of its cross-sectional area, cracked, broken, or missing. All pins shall be secured in place with cotters, split keys, or nuts. Brake shoes shall be fastened with a brake shoe key and aligned in relation to the wheel to prevent localized thermal stress in the edge of the rim or the flange.
EX-10.5



 Exhibit 10.5 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO THE 

MATTEL, INC. 2005 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Mattel, Inc. (“Mattel”) maintains the Mattel, Inc. 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (the
“Plan”); 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 9.1(a) and (b) of the Plan, the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors of Mattel (the “Compensation Committee”) may amend the Plan at any time, provided, that no amendment to the Plan may be adopted that would reduce the dollar value of a Plan participant’s vested
benefit under the Plan without such participant’s consent; and 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee desires to
amend the Plan to cause certain amounts payable under the Plan to be subject to the Mattel, Inc. Compensation Recovery Policy. 

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Sections 9.1(a) and (b) of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of August 29,
2013, as follows: 
 1. A new Section 5.8 shall be added as follows: 

“Notwithstanding any provision in this Plan to the contrary, amounts paid or payable under this Plan shall be subject to the terms
and conditions of the Mattel, Inc. Compensation Recovery Policy, as may be amended from time to time (the “Compensation Recovery Policy”), to the extent applicable (including by reason of such amounts being calculated or determined
by reference to an underlying amount or payment that is subject to the Compensation Recovery Policy).” 
 2. Affected
Participant Consent. This Amendment No. 1 is subject to the consent of each Plan participant who is subject to the Compensation Recovery Policy and participates in the Plan as of August 29, 2013 (each, an “Affected
Participant”). To the extent that any such Affected Participant does not consent to this Amendment No. 1, the provisions of this Amendment No. 1 shall not apply to such Affected Participant. 

3. Ratification and Confirmation. Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects
and remains in full force and effect. 
 4. Headings. Section headings are for convenience only and shall not be
considered a part of this Amendment No. 1. 
 * * * * * 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Mattel has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed, effective as of August 29, 2013. 

 

			
	MATTEL, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Alan Kaye
	Name:	 	Alan Kaye
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer
		
	Dated:	 	September 3, 2013
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0681 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Nancy Coleman 

Address: 

Broomfield, CO, 

Organization: NAMI Boulder County 

General Comment 

On behalf of NAMI Boulder County, serving Boulder & Broomfield counties, I am writing to submit 

comments on the Interim Final Rules under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health 

Parity and Addiction Equity Acto of 2008 and Implementation Coalition and the National Alliance 

on Mental Illness. NAMI is committed to ending discrimination against individuals and families 

who seek services for MH/SUD. NAMI looks forward to working with the Departments to modify 

and finalize the Rules so that they promote strong, clear parity protections. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: May 03, 2010 

Received: May 02, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ae5475 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 5/3/2010
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 5/18/15 1:15 PM

Received: May 14, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8iur-m8ti

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0275

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: MICHAEL GRINNELL

Address: 

44 SCHOOL STREET

6TH FLR, STE. 600A

BOSTON, MA, 02108

Email: MGG5@CORNELL.EDU

Phone: 6172338003

General Comment

I have been a CFP Practitioner for 17 years, and I have held a securities license for 22 years, 

and I fully support the proposed rule. I have seen countless sales promotions and rewards, 

largely for selling life insurance and annuities. Because most of my practice involves fee-forservice financial planning and investment advisory services, I do not collect the high 

commissions associated with annuities ... frankly, I cannot justify selling them as they are not in 

the best interests of the vast majority of my clients (most of whom are in or near retirement). 

Annuities are recommended instead of lower-cost alternatives for one reason, and one reason 

only ... high commissions. We need to level the playing field for both advisors and consumers 

by (1) adopting a Uniform Fiduciary Standard, and (2) requiring full disclosure of all charges, 

fees, and commissions. Thank you.

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481ae1cb7&format=xml&show... 5/18/2015
#### Matter of New York, West Shore and Buffalo Railway Company, *Respondent, v.*Charles A. Donaldson, Appellant.—

Order modified so as to pay the present owner the value of ..the dower of wife of grantor, and as modified affirmed, without costs to either party. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
H. R. 2464

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To amend Public Law 103–93 to provide additional lands within the State of

Utah for the Goshute Indian Reservation, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITION OF CERTAIN UTAH STATE LANDS TO GOSHUTE

INDIAN RESERVATION.

The Utah Schools and Lands Improvement Act of 1993 (107

Stat. 995) is amended—

(1) by redesignating section 11 as section 12; and

(2) by inserting after section 10 the following new section:

‘‘SEC. 11. ADDITIONAL GOSHUTE INDIAN RESERVATION LANDS.

‘‘(a) FURTHER ADDITIONS TO GOSHUTE RESERVATION.—In addition to the lands described in section 3, for the purpose of securing

in trust for the Goshute Indian Tribe certain additional public

lands and lands belonging to the State of Utah, which comprise

approximately 8,000 acres of surface and subsurface estate, as

generally depicted on the map entitled ‘Additional Utah-Goshute

Exchange’, dated July 1, 1994, such public lands and State lands

are hereby declared to be part of the Goshute Indian Reservation

in the State of Utah effective upon the completion of conveyance

of the State lands from the State of Utah and acceptance of title

by the United States.

‘‘(b) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to acquire through exchange those lands and interests in

land described in subsection (a) which are owned by the State

of Utah, subject to valid existing rights.

‘‘(c) APPLICATION OF PRIOR PROVISIONS.—(1) Except as provided

in paragraph (2), the remaining provisions of this Act which are

applicable to the lands to be transferred to the Goshute Indian

Tribe pursuant to section 3 shall also apply to the lands subject

to this section.

‘‘(2) The Goshute Indian Tribe will be responsible for payment

of the costs of appraisal of the lands to be acquired pursuant
H. R. 2464—2

to this section, which costs shall be paid prior to the transfer

of such lands.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**Exhibit      31.2**

**Certification**

|   |                                                                                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                 |
|   |                                                                                 |
|   | /s/                   Richard                H.                Marsh  |
|   | Richard                H.                MarshChief                Financial Officer |

----

**Exhibit      31.2**

**Certification**

|   |                                                                                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                 |
|   |                                                                                 |
|   | /s/                   Richard                H.                Marsh  |
|   | Richard                H.                MarshChief                Financial Officer |

----