alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 164 / Friday, August 24, 2007 / Presidential Documents 48931 

Proclamation 8168 of August 21, 2007 

Constitution Day and Citizenship Day, Constitution Week, 

2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

On Constitution Day and Citizenship Day and during Constitution Week, 

we celebrate the anniversary of our Nation’s Constitution and honor the 

Framers who created the landmark document that continues to guide our 

Nation. 

In the summer of 1787, delegates convened in Philadelphia to create ‘‘a 

more perfect Union’’ and craft the document that is the foundation of our 

country. With great diligence, they worked to develop a framework that 

would balance authority and inherent freedoms, Federal interests and State 

powers, individual rights and national unity. On September 17th of the 

same year, the delegates signed the Constitution of the United States. 

Today, every American shares in this legacy of liberty, and we are grateful 

for the courage, conviction, and sacrifice of all those who have helped 

preserve and uphold the principles of a free society. As we remember 

the enduring importance of the Constitution, we also recognize our responsibility as citizens to respect and defend the values of our founding and 

participate in the unfolding story of freedom. 

In celebration of the signing of the Constitution and in recognition of the 

Americans who strive to uphold the duties and responsibilities of citizenship, 

the Congress, by joint resolution of February 29, 1952 (36 U.S.C. 106, as 

amended), designated September 17 as ‘‘Constitution Day and Citizenship 

Day,’’ and by joint resolution of August 2, 1956 (36 U.S.C. 108, as amended), 

requested that the President proclaim the week beginning September 17 

and ending September 23 of each year as ‘‘Constitution Week.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim September 17, 2007, as Constitution Day 

and Citizenship Day, and September 17 through September 23, 2007, as 

Constitution Week. I encourage Federal, State, and local officials, as well 

as leaders of civic, social, and educational organizations, to conduct ceremonies and programs that celebrate our Constitution and reaffirm our rights 

and responsibilities as citizens of our great Nation. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS4
48932 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 164 / Friday, August 24, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-first 

day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtysecond. 

[FR Doc. 07–4199 

Filed 8–23–07; 8:52 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS4GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 47066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4112]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Scientific Earthquake Studies Advisory Committee

AGENCY: U.S. Geological Survey.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 106-503, the Scientific Earthquake 
Studies Advisory Committee (SESC) will hold its 16th meeting. The 
meeting location is the Paso Robles Inn, 1103 Spring Street, Paso 
Robles, California 93446. The Committee is comprised of members from 
academia, industry, and State government. The Committee shall advise 
the Director of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) on matters relating 
to the USGS's participation in the National Earthquake Hazards 
Reduction Program.
    The Committee will receive updates and provide guidance on 
Earthquake Hazards Program activities and the status of teams supported 
by the Program, as well as a report from the Advanced National Seismic 
System steering committee.
    Meetings of the Scientific Earthquake Studies Advisory Committee 
are open to the public.

DATES: September 5, 2007, commencing at 8:30 a.m. and adjourning at 5 
p.m.
    Contact: Dr. William S. Leith, U.S. Geological Survey, MS 905, 
12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, Virginia 20192, (703) 648-6786, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#72051e171b061a32070115015c151d04"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e49388818d908ca491978397ca838b92">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 14, 2007.
David Applegate,
Acting Associate Director for Geology.
[FR Doc. 07-4112 Filed 8-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4311-AM-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX 23.1

 

 

 

 

 

Consent of Independent Accountants

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-8 (File Nos. 2-71595, 33-14926, 2-79636, 33-14925, 33-14927, 33-26150, 33-53478,33-67384, 33-56487 333-30763, 333-50627, 333-14189, and 33-55558) of ChesapeakeCorporation of our report dated February 2, 2001, except as to information in Notes 2, 3and 15, for which the date is March 2, 2001, which appears in the Annual Report toShareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC

------------------------------

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC

 

Richmond, Virginia

March 15, 2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-1-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# Time and Date: 

9 a.m. (Eastern Time), July 16, 2007. 

# Place: 

4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. 

# Status: 

Open. 

# Matters to be Considered:

 

1. Approval of the minutes of the June 19, 2007 Board member meeting.

2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director:

a. Monthly Participant Activity Report.

b. Legislative Report.

3. Quarterly Reports:

a. Investment Policy Review.

b. Vendor Financial Reports. 

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640. 

Dated: July 9, 2007. 

Thomas K. Emswiler, 

Secretary to the Board, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board. 

[FR Doc. 07-3391 Filed 7-9-07; 11:33 am] 

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
----

----

| CLECO      CORPORATION | EXHIBIT      21 |
|------------------------|-----------------|

----

|   | SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT OR      ORGANIZATION        | STATE      OF INCORPORATION |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   | Acadia Partners Pipeline      LLC                      | Louisiana                   |   |
|   | Acadia Power Holdings      LLC                         | Louisiana                   |   |
|   | Acadia Power Partners,      LLC                        | Delaware                    |   |
|   | Attala Transmission      LLC                           | Louisiana                   |   |
|   | CLE Intrastate Pipeline Company      LLC               | Louisiana                   |   |
|   | Cleco Energy LLC                                       | Texas                       |   |
|   | Cleco Evangeline    LLC                                | Louisiana                   |   |
|   | Cleco Generation Services      LLC                     | Louisiana                   |   |
|   | Cleco Innovations      LLC                             | Louisiana                   |   |
|   | Cleco Katrina/Rita Hurricane      Recovery Funding LLC | Louisiana                   |   |
|   | Cleco Marketing & Trading      LLC                 | Louisiana                   |   |
|   | Cleco Midstream Resources      LLC                     | Louisiana                   |   |
|   | Cleco Power LLC                                        | Louisiana                   |   |
|   | Cleco Support Group      LLC                           | Louisiana                   |   |
|   | DeSoto Pipeline Company,      Inc.                     | Louisiana                   |   |
|   | Diversified Lands      LLC                             | Louisiana                   |   |
|   | Four Square Production,      LLC                       | Texas                       |   |
|   | Perryville Energy Holdings      LLC                    | Louisiana                   |   |
|   | Perryville Energy Partners,      L.L.C.                | Delaware                    |   |

----

----
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0095 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Donna Newberry Creasy 

Address: 

914 Kent Drive 

Ruther Glen, VA, 22546 

Email: donnacreasy@verizon.net 

Phone: 540-287-4565 

Organization: 703-792-4934 

General Comment 

I am a clinical supervisor for intensive in-home services for youth at the 

Community Services Board in Prince William VA. About 6 years ago, a part-time 

therapist working for me told me about the amazing results she was getting 

treating her son’s Asperger’s Syndrome with neurofeedback (also known as EEG 

biofeedback, and more simply as “brain training”). I began researching the 

subject and was quickly fascinated by its potential for treating not only 

problems such as ADHD, depression and anxiety, but more intractable problems 

including traumatic brain injury, autism spectrum disorders, effects of prenatal 

drug exposure, PTSD, and a host of other problems. I have pursued training and 

purchased equipment, mostly at my own expense, although my agency is eager to 

expand this intervention when the budget allows, having been very impressed with 

the results I've gotten. This most promising intervention appears to have no 

downside except the expense -- most insurance does not reimburse for it. I have 

succeeded in getting Medicaid to cover it in our state as part of a 

comprehensive treatment regimen. I believe when insurance companies realize 

that neurofeedback reduces/eliminates the needs for many medications with much 

more positive outcomes, they will see the cost savings that can result to them. 

I have been involved in or supervised the successful neurofeedback treatment of 

ADHD, anxiety, severe depression, intermittent explosive disorder, PTSD, OCD, 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 26, 2009 

Received: May 25, 2009 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 809b431a 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web
Asperger’s, reactive attachment disorder, and substance abuse. I have been 

astonished at the results. You can find a great deal of research organized by 

disorders at http://www.isnr.org/uploads/compbiblio.pdf , which is compiled 

periodically by a professional at the University of Utah Medical School. I hope 

this will convince you that this is not a passing fancy, but a remarkable 

cutting edge intervention that merits recognition and coverage by standard 

health insurance contracts. 

Donna Creasy, LPC, LMFT, BCIA-EEG 

Ruther Glen, VA
§ 178.33a-7 Wall thickness. ( a ) The minimum wall thickness for any container shall be 0.008 inch.
( b ) [Reserved]
[Order 71, 31 FR 9074, July 1, 1966. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967]
Kuykendall & Schneider, Inc.

3405 22nd Street, Suite 202~ Lubbock, Texas 79410

Phone 806-793-2525 ~ Fax 806-793-2528

July 20, 2015

The Honorable Thomas Perez

Secretary

United States Department of Labor

200 Constitution Ave, NW

Washington, DC 20210

RE: DOL Fiduciary Rule Proposal 

Dear Secretary Perez:

I am the owner of an independent broker/dealer. I have been serving clients investment needs for 28 years. Our 

client base is composed of main-street, middle-class Americans. It is my view that the proposal, as it stands, would 

have significant negative implications for both retirement plan participants and IRA owners. As I read the proposal, 

the choice of financial products could be limited and remove client options. Client access to financial education or 

professional advice would certainly be impacted as the proposal reads. Clients currently served would become the 

underserved or even worse, the unserved. The proposed savings to retirement participants as noted in the DOL 

studies provided could in fact have the opposite long-term impact by creating additional costs to plan participants 

and IRA owners.

I am curious if the Department of Labor conducted a feasibility study on the impact to my industry (small 

independent broker/dealers). These professionals have been the backbone of assisting plan participants and IRA 

owners over the last 40 years. If approved, I believe the impact of the proposal would be significant on these 

businesses. In contrast to the implied harm committed to retirement plan participants and IRA owners, it appears to 

me that these brokers and advisors have been crucial in building the approximately $7.443 trillion in retirement 

assets currently held in such accounts. Until such a study is complete, I cannot envision how the DOL could be in 

favor of destroying relationships forged over years, which have resulted in investment success for millions of 

middle-class Americans and retirees. 

As you may know, independent broker/dealers are highly regulated. Currently, our office is audited by five different 

independent auditors on a regular basis. As a broker/dealer, the regulators already monitor how client assets are 

invested. Any inappropriate investments are met with disciplinary actions, fines, or both. Implementation of the 

proposal as it stands would only add unnecessary duplication of existing regulation.

I respectfully request that your office spend additional time evaluating the unintended consequences of the proposal 

as it stands and recognize the benefit of advice at a reasonable cost to participants and IRA owners. In the words of 

Noble Prize-winning economist Robert Shiller, “People make better decisions with financial advisors.”

Sincerely,

Miles Hornak

President
§ 26.91 What actions do certifiers take following DOT certification appeal decisions? ( a ) If you are the certifier from whose action an appeal under § 26.89 is taken, the decision is binding. It is not binding on other certifiers.
( b ) If you are a certifier to which a DOT determination under § 26.89 is applicable, you must take the following action: ( 1 ) If the Department determines that you erroneously certified a firm, you must remove the firm's eligibility on receipt of the determination, without further proceedings on your part. Effective on the date of your receipt of the Department's determination, the consequences of a removal of eligibility set forth in § 26.87(j) take effect.
( 2 ) If the Department determines that you erroneously failed to find reasonable cause to remove the firm's eligibility, you must expeditiously commence a proceeding to determine whether the firm's eligibility should be removed, as provided in § 26.87.
( 3 ) If the Department determines that you erroneously declined to certify or removed the eligibility of the firm, you must certify the firm, effective on the date of your receipt of the written notice of Department's determination.
( 4 ) If the Department determines that you erroneously determined that the presumption of social and economic disadvantage either should or should not be deemed rebutted, you must take appropriate corrective action as determined by the Department.
( 5 ) If the Department affirms your determination, no further action is necessary.
( c ) Where DOT has upheld your denial of certification to or removal of eligibility from a firm, or directed the removal of a firm's eligibility, other certifiers with whom the firm is certified may commence a proceeding to remove the firm's eligibility under § 26.87. Such certifiers must not remove the firm's eligibility absent such a proceeding. Where DOT has reversed your denial of certification to or removal of eligibility from a firm, other certifiers must take the DOT action into account in any certification action involving the firm. However, other certifiers are not required to certify the firm based on the DOT decision.
[64 FR 5126, Feb. 2, 1999, as amended at 89 FR 24979, Apr. 9, 2024]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2469

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to permit an individual entitled

to both old-age or disability insurance benefits and to widow’s or widower’s insurance benefits to receive both without reduction in the amount

of the widow’s or widower’s insurance benefit by the amount of the

old-age or disability insurance benefit.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 11, 1995

Mr. STOCKMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to permit an

individual entitled to both old-age or disability insurance

benefits and to widow’s or widower’s insurance benefits

to receive both without reduction in the amount of the

widow’s or widower’s insurance benefit by the amount

of the old-age or disability insurance benefit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wanda Boughton So5 cial Security Original Intent Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 2469 IH

1 SEC. 2. RECEIPT OF BOTH OLD-AGE OR DISABILITY INSUR2 ANCE BENEFITS AND WIDOW’S OR WIDOW3 ER’S INSURANCE BENEFITS WITHOUT REDUC4 TION IN THE WIDOW’S OR WIDOWER’S INSUR5 ANCE BENEFIT.

6 Section 202(k)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act (42

7 U.S.C. 402(k)(3)(A)) is amended by inserting ‘‘(other

8 than a widow’s or widower’s insurance benefit)’’ after

9 ‘‘any other monthly insurance benefit for such month’’.

10 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

11 The amendment made by section 2 of this Act shall

12 apply with respect to benefits for months after the date

13 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<LEGEND>
=======================================================================
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
company's financial statements as of and for the year ended March 31,  
1997 and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such financial
statements.
======================================================================= 

</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            Mar-31-1997

<CASH>                                     586,629
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                           35,309,653
<ALLOWANCES>                               855,213
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                     658,340
<DEPRECIATION>                             445,049
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          35,455,752

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                20,623,866

<OTHER-SE>                                 611,253
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            35,455,752

<SALES>                                  3,866,104
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         3,866,104
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           129,381
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           135,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         937,410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          2,126,758
<INCOME-TAX>                                16,980
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                             2,126,758

<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .30


</TABLE>
§ 246.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to ensure that only those persons who meet minimum Federal safety standards serve as certified signal employees, to reduce the rate and number of accidents and incidents, and to improve railroad safety.
( b ) This part prescribes minimum Federal safety standards for the eligibility, training, testing, certification and monitoring of all signal employees to whom it applies. This part does not restrict a railroad from adopting and enforcing additional or more stringent requirements consistent with this part.
( c ) The signal employee certification requirements prescribed in this part apply to any person who meets the definition of signal employee contained in § 246.7, regardless of the fact that the person may have a job classification title other than that of signal employee.
§ 176.108 Supervision of Class 1 (explosive) materials during loading, unloading, handling and stowage. ( a ) During the loading, unloading, handling and stowage of Class 1 (explosive) materials, a responsible person shall be in constant attendance during the entire operation to direct the loading, unloading, handling and stowage of Class 1 (explosive) materials, including the preparation of the holds. The responsible person must be aware of the hazards involved and the steps to be taken in an emergency, and must maintain sufficient contact with the master to ensure proper steps are taken in an emergency.
( b ) Each person involved in the handling of Class 1 (explosive) materials on a vessel shall obey the orders of the responsible person.
( c ) The responsible person must inspect all cargo-handling equipment to determine that it is in safe operating condition before it is used to handle Class 1 (explosive) materials.