alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 159 (Friday, August 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 46194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4025]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 159 / Friday, August 17, 2007 / 
Notices

[[Page 46194]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee will hold a 
meeting on September 5, 2007 at the U.S. Forest Service Office, 35 
College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150. This Committee, established 
by the Secretary of Agriculture on December 15, 1998 (64 FR 2876), is 
chartered to provide advice to the Secretary on implementing the terms 
of the Federal Interagency Partnership on the Lake Tahoe Region and 
other matters raised by the Secretary.

DATES: The meeting will be held September 5, 2007, beginning at 1 p.m. 
and ending at 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. Forest Service Office, 
35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arla Hains, Lake Tahoe Basin 
Management Unit, Forest Service, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 
96150, (530) 543-2773.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Items to be covered on the agenda include: 
(1) The Lake Tahoe Federal Advisory Committee Communications Plan; (2) 
an update on the Angora Fire; and (3) Public Comment. All Lake Tahoe 
Basin Federal Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. 
Interested citizens are encouraged to attend at the above address.
    Issues may be brought to the attention of the Committee during the 
open public comment period at the meeting or by filing written 
statements with the secretary for the Committee before or after the 
meeting. Please refer any written comments to the Lake Tahoe Basin 
Management Unit at the contact address stated above.

    Dated: August 13, 2007.
Terri Marceron,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07-4025 Filed 8-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
§ 230.2 Applicability. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this part applies to all railroads that operate steam locomotives.
( b ) This part does not apply to: ( 1 ) A railroad with track gage of less than 24 inches;
( 2 ) A railroad that operates exclusively freight trains and does so only on track inside an installation that is not part of the general system of transportation;
( 3 ) Rapid transit operations in an urban area that are not connected to the general system of transportation; or
( 4 ) A railroad that operates passenger trains and does so only on track inside an installation that is insular, i.e., its operations are limited to a separate enclave in such a way that there is no reasonable expectation that the safety of the public—except a business guest, a licensee of the railroad or an affiliated entity, or a trespasser—would be affected by the operation. An operation will not be considered insular if one or more of the following exists on its line: ( i ) A public highway-rail crossing that is in use;
( ii ) An at-grade rail crossing that is in use;
( iii ) A bridge over a public road or waters used for commercial navigation; or
( iv ) A common corridor with another railroad, i.e., its operations are conducted within 30 feet of those of any other railroad.
( c ) See appendix A of part 209 for a current statement of the FRA's policy on its exercise of jurisdiction.
#### Isaac Hampton, *Respondent, v.*Peter Depuy and another, *Executors, etc.,*Appellants.—

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, costs to abide event unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce judgment to the sum of $170.38 with six years interest thereon, in which case the judgment as so reduced is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
#### § 266.11 Allowable costs.

Allowable costs include only the following costs which are properly allocable to the work performed: Planning and program operation costs which are allowed under Federal Management Circular 74-4; and costs of projects eligible under § 266.7 of this part. All allowable costs shall be authorized by a fully executed grant agreement. A State may incur costs prior to the execution of a grant agreement only if the Administrator, based on the State's demonstration of a compelling need to incur costs prior to the execution of a grant agreement, has authorized the costs in writing prior to their incurrence by the State.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7275

DAVID PERKINS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. LT. W. DONOWAY; SGT. S. WILSON; SGT. L. RAMOS , Defendants

- Appellees , and

EDWARD JOHNSON , Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Deborah Lynn Boardman , District Judge. ( 1:20

- cv
- 00811

- DLB )

Submitted : January 20, 2022 Decided: January 25, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ , and THACKER Circuit Judges

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

David Perkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

David Perkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying without prejudice
his motion to appoint counsel in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 proceedings. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S .C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order Perkins seeks to appeal is neither a final
order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Miller v. Simmons , 814 F.2d 962,
967 (4 th Cir. 1987) (holding that denial of motion to appoint counsel is not immediately
appealable)

. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented i n the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Eliza Cromwell, Respondent, *v.*William F. Romer, and Jacob H. Tremper, Appellants.—

Order modified as directed in opinion, without costs to either party. Opinion by

Brady, J.
#### § 228.305 Compliance date.

On and after December 30, 2011, a railroad shall not provide a camp car for use as sleeping quarters by an employee or MOW worker unless the camp car complies with all requirements of this subpart.
#### § 234.239 Tagging of wires and interference of wires or tags with signal apparatus.

Each wire shall be tagged or otherwise so marked that it can be identified at each terminal. Tags and other marks of identification shall be made of insulating material and so arranged that tags and wires do not interfere with moving parts of the apparatus. This requirement applies to each wire at each terminal in all housings including switch circuit controllers and terminal or junction boxes. This requirement does not apply to flashing light units, gate arm light units and other auxiliary light units. The local wiring on a solid state crossing controller rack does not require tags if the wiring is an integral part of the solid state equipment.
From: Susan Stuebbe [mailto:info318@cinci.rr.com] 

Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 7:07 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32 

Stay out of my retirement investment business.

I know how to read.

I have a functioning brain.

I know my needs better than anyone hiding behind the federal government outhouse.

Susan Stuebbe

Cincinnati, OH
§ 230.81 Cab aprons. ( a ) *General provisions.* Cab aprons shall be of proper length and width to ensure safety. Cab aprons shall be securely hinged, maintained in a safe and suitable condition for service, and roughened, or other provision made, to afford secure footing.
( b ) *Width of apron.* The cab apron shall be of a sufficient width to prevent, when the drawbar is disconnected and the safety chains or the safety bars are taut, the apron from dropping between the steam locomotive and tender.
#### § 236.752 Joint, rail, insulated.

A joint in which electrical insulation is provided between adjoining rails.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DANIEL ROBERT DANGERFIELD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 61

[ July 11, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Indian River County ; Cynthia L. Cox , Judge; L.T. Case No.

312018CF000285A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J.

Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J.

, K UNTZ

, J. and B OATWRIGHT

, J OE , Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0261 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Randy Neblett 

Address: 

Dallas, TX, 

Organization: BCIA 

General Comment 

I am responding to your request for feedback on the Request for Information 

Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008. 

The Biofeedback Certification Institute of America (BCIA) represents approximately 

1400 clinicians, most of whom are psychologists and other mental health 

professionals. Though biofeedback has been shown to be an effective treatment 

modality for a wide variety of mental health and stress-related disorders, we 

frequently receive complaints from our certificants that biofeedback is very often 

denied or is reimbursed at a very low rate by third party payers. Please recognize 

biofeedback as a legitimate and effective treatment modality for mental health 

disorders as you evaluate the parity of reimbursement between mental health and 

medical treatments. 

Thank you, 

Randy Neblett 

BCIA Chair 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 29, 2009 

Received: May 28, 2009 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 809bcde0 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web
§ 29.926 What rights do the Department and a Tribe have in an appeal of a termination decision? ( a ) During the appeal of a termination decision, the Department and a Tribe have the right to: ( 1 ) A designated representative;
( 2 ) Present the testimony of witnesses, orally or in writing, who have knowledge of the relevant issues;
( 3 ) Cross-examine witnesses;
( 4 ) Introduce oral or documentary evidence, or both;
( 5 ) Receive, upon request and payment of reasonable costs, a copy of the transcript of the hearing, and copies of all documentary evidence that is introduced at the hearing;
( 6 ) Take depositions, request the production of documents, serve interrogatories on other parties, and request admissions; and
( 7 ) Any other procedural rights established under the Administrative Procedure Act.
( b ) An administrative law judge assigned by the chief administrative law judge of the Department's Office of Hearings must conduct hearings on the record for a termination decision unless the Tribe waives the hearing.
-----Original Message----- 

From: kscarbro@sol.rutgers.edu [mailto:kscarbro@sol.rutgers.edu] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 7:33 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

I'm glad we live in an era where illnesses of the brain are understood 

to be on par with illnesses in any other part of the body. 

Sincerely, 

Kathy Scarbrough 

59 Tall Oaks Drive 

East Brunswick, NJ 08816
# EUR-Lex - 52003XC0214(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52003XC0214(01)

**Commission notice updating the list of parties under examination pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97 on the exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty on imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the People's Republic of China **

*
Official Journal C 035 , 14/02/2003 P. 0003 - 0005 *

Commission notice updating the list of parties under examination pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97 on the exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty on imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the People's Republic of China

(2003/C 35/03)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97(1) of 20 January 1997 authorises the exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty on imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the People's Republic of China. This duty resulted from the extension by Council Regulation (EC) No 71/97(2) of the anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93(3), and maintained by Council Regulation (EC) No 1524/2000(4). Annex I to Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97 comprises a list of parties whose requests for authorisation for exemption from the extended duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 71/97 were under examination.

Interested parties are hereby informed of the receipt of further requests for exemption, pursuant to Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97, and of requests which are still under examination at this stage. The suspension from the extended duty, following these requests, took effect as shown in Annex I to this Notice, which constitutes an updated list of parties under examination.

(1) OJ L 17, 21.1.1997, p. 17.

(2) OJ L 16, 18.1.1997, p. 55.

(3) OJ L 228, 9.9.1993, p. 1.

(4) OJ L 175, 14.7.2000, p. 39.

ANNEX

Parties under examination

>TABLE>
§ 30.9 Citizenship: Direct or indirect control. A contractor, subcontractor, or person providing a service shall be considered to be a citizen or national of a foreign country, or controlled directly or indirectly by citizens or nationals of a foreign country, within the meaning of this part. ( a ) If 50 percent or more of the contractor or subcontractor is owned by one or more citizens or nationals of the foreign country;
( b ) If the title to 50 percent or more of the stock of the contractor or subcontractor is held subject to trust or fiduciary obligation in favor of one or more citizens or nationals of the foreign country;
( c ) If 50 percent or more of the voting power in the contractor or subcontractor is vested in or exercisable on behalf of one or more citizens or nationals of the foreign country;
( d ) In the case of a partnership, if any general partner is a citizen or national of the foreign country;
( e ) In the case of a corporation, if the number of its directors necessary to constitute a quorum are citizens of the foreign country or the corporation is organized under the laws of the foreign country or any subdivision, territory, or possession thereof; or
( f ) In the case of a contractor or subcontractor that is a joint venture, if any participant meets any of the criteria in paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF WALL STREET DELI, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 30, 1995,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-2-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,439,448
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,859,450
<ALLOWANCES>                                   200,155
<INVENTORY>                                  1,133,113
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,454,800
<PP&E>                                      35,522,170
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,481,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,800,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,063,253
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       169,789
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,567,568
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,800,610
<SALES>                                     34,744,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,744,271
<CGS>                                       31,684,182
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,684,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                34,744
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             114,142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 94,604
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             69,604
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    69,604
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 2:11 PM

Received: July 14, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jz6-oan0

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2258

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jonathan Fletcher

General Comment

On page 4 of the proposed regulation, DoL expresses the view that seldom can Americans 

prudently manage retirement benefits on their own and that they generally cannot distinguish 

good investments from bad. I find this attitude offensive, and do not approve of the proposed 

changes. I am capable of managing my own investments. Given the current state of the Social 

Security Trust Fund, I believe I am more capable of overseeing my money than the Federal 

Bureaucracy.

Many of the non-registered brokers and dealers this regulation would affect cater to smaller 

investors. These brokers are already required to disclose their potential conflicts of interest. This 

allows customers to make their own choices on risk and potential reward. 

The proposed regulation change would cause these brokers to charge higher fees, or move to a 

registered investment adviser role that would likely force them to raise the minimum level of 

investment in their products. Both of these results would price many Americans out of their 

products.

Furthermore, the proposed regulation would also be detrimental to those with self-directed IRAs. 

Currently, these allow investors to invest in non-conventional assets such as precious metals or 
real estate. The proposed fiduciary responsibility changes would certainly lead to fewer 

investment options being available for these types of retirement accounts.
#### § 238.207 Link between coupling mechanism and carbody.

Except as specified in § 238.201(b), all passenger equipment placed in service for the first time on or after September 8, 2000, shall have a coupler carrier at each end designed to resist a vertical downward thrust from the coupler shank of 100,000 pounds for any normal horizontal position of the coupler, without permanent deformation. Passenger equipment connected by articulated joints that complies with the requirements of § 238.205(a) also complies with the requirements of this section.

[83 FR 59219, Nov. 21, 2018]
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 21

- 2107

_____________________________
H ENRY A. W ILLIAMS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County

. James M. Colaw , Judge

. September 10, 2021

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R AY , J AY , and T ANENBAUM , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Henry A. Williams, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.