alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John Henke et al., appellants, v. George W. Deemer, appellee.

Filed April 14, 1917.

No. 19455.

1. Justice of the Peace: Jurisdiction. “In computing the ‘amount in controversy’ to ascertain whether a case is within the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace, interest accrued at the time of suit on an interest-bearing debt should be considered.” *Adams v. Nebraska Savings & Exchange Bank,*56 Neb. 121.

2. -: -. “It is not the amount which the bill of particulars shows the plaintiff might claim, but the actual amount of his demand, which ascertains the jurisdictional amount.” *Adams v. Nebraska Savings & Exchange Bank,*56 Neb. 121.

3. -: -. The bill of particulars and summons both disclosing that the amount of the debt with interest from the time it was claimed to the filing of the suit exceeded $200, a justice of the peace had no jurisdiction of the suit.

Appeal from the district court for Dawes county: William H. Westover, Judge.

*Reversed, with directions.*

*Allen G. Fisher*and *William P.*Rooney, for appellants.

*Lee Card, contra.*

Letton, J.

Plaintiff filed a bill of particulars, not verified, before the county judge exercising jurisdiction as a justice of the peace, and procured a summons, returnable in four days, to be issued and served. He sought to recover for medical services in the sum of $197, with interest from the 3d day of January, 1914. Defendants appeared especially and objected to the jurisdiction of the judge, because the amount sued for was in excess of $200, the limit of jurisdiction of a justice of the peace. The court had no power to issue a summons returnable in four days in such a case, and the summons was not returnable nor in form or substance such as required in term cases. . This objection was overruled,. and defendants made no further appearance. Judg*127ment was rendered by default against them for $197. Error proceedings were prosecuted to tbe district court, which affirmed the judgment. Defendants appeal.

In *Adams v. Nebraska Savings & Exchange*Bank, 56 Neb. 121, it is held that the “amount in controversy” which determines the jurisdiction includes interest accrued at the time of the suit, but that if the summons does not show on its face that the demand is in excess of jurisdiction upon default, the court could render judgment to the full jurisdictional amount.

In this case both the bill of particulars and the summons disclosed that the plaintiff claimed $197, with interest from January 3, 1914. The debt exceeded the jurisdiction of the county judge sitting as a justice of the peace, and the summons returnable in four days should have been quashed.

The judgment of the district court is reversed and the 'cause remanded, with instructions to reverse the judgment of the county court.

Reversed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Oregon Coast Province Advisory Committee will meet at Surftides Inn, Lincoln City. The agenda includes: Bureau of Land Management Western Oregon Planning Revision, Review of WOPR Issues and work towards recommendation, Public Comment.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held September 13, 2007 beginning at 9 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at 2945 NW. Jetty Ave., Lincoln City, OR 97367.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joni Quarnstrom, Public Affairs Specialist, Siuslaw National Forest, 541-750-7075, or write to Suislaw National Forest Supervisor, 4077 SW. Research Way, Corvallis, OR 97339.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Council Discussion is limited to Forest Service/BLM staff and Council Members. Lunch will be on your own. A public input session will be at 2 p.m. for fifteen minutes. The meeting is expected to adjourn around 3 p.m.

Dated: August 28, 2007.

Chip Weber,

Acting Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 07-4301 Filed 8-31-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2262 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2262

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the United States Post Office building located at 218 
   North Alston Street in Foley, Alabama, as the ``Holk Post Office 
                              Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2262

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States Post Office building located at 218 
   North Alston Street in Foley, Alabama, as the ``Holk Post Office 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 218 North Alston 
Street in Foley, Alabama, shall be known and designated as the ``Holk 
Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Post Office building 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Holk Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 19, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Order entered June 19, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-00539-CV

IN RE TEN HAGEN EXCAVATING, INC., Relator

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-11-00454-A

ORDER

In accordance with the Court’s opinion issued this date, the petition for writ of 

mandamus is conditionally GRANTED. The Court ORDERS the trial judge, the Honorable 

D’metria Benson, Judge of County Court at Law No. 1, to VACATE her March 24, 2014 “Order 

Denying Defendant Ten Hagen Excavating, Inc.’s Motion for Plaintiff Jose Castro-Lopez to be 

Examined by Defendant’s Medical Expert.” Should the trial judge fail to comply with this 

order, the writ will issue. The Court ORDERS the trial judge to file with this Court, within 

thirty (30) days of the date of this order, a certified copy of her order issued in compliance 

with this order. We DENY as moot relator’s motion for emergency stay. We ORDER that 

relator recover its costs of this original proceeding from real party in interest.

.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
#### § 236.734 Current of traffic.

The movement of trains on a specified track in a designated direction.
-----Original Message----- 

From: gonzalezka@hotmail.com [mailto:gonzalezka@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 2:11 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

K Gonzalez 

21B Avenida Vieja 

Galisteo, NM 87540
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000705581
<NAME>                        Digital Commerce International, Inc.
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   JUL-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                1
<CASH>                         11,857
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  150,709
<ALLOWANCES>                   22,233
<INVENTORY>                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               140,333
<PP&E>                         54,298
<DEPRECIATION>                 14,904
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 488,458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          590,571
<BONDS>                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    0
<COMMON>                       1,983,371
<OTHER-SE>                     (2,085,484)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   488,458
<SALES>                        112,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               113,428
<CGS>                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  1,647,093
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (1,533,665)
<INCOME-TAX>                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (1,533,665)
<DISCONTINUED>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                   (1,533,665)
<EPS-BASIC>                    (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                  (0.12)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, James L. Dewar, Jr., certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PAB Bankshares, Inc; 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
 4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 
 a.)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
 b.)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
 c.)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 
 5.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
 a.)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
 b.)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. 
 Date:***November 9, 2004***
By:
***/s/ James L. Dewar, Jr.***James L. Dewar, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer of the registrant)
#### § 236.810 Spectacle, semaphore arm.

That part of a semaphore arm which holds the roundels and to which the blade is fastened.
# EUR-Lex - 52003XC1205(02) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52003XC1205(02)

**Commission communication pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 — Modification by the United Kingdom of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services between the Orkney Mainland (Kirkwall) and the islands of Westray, Sanday, Stronsay and Eday (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal C 295 , 05/12/2003 P. 0013 - 0013 *

Commission communication pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92

Modification by the United Kingdom of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services between the Orkney Mainland (Kirkwall) and the islands of Westray, Sanday, Stronsay and Eday

(2003/C 295/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

1. The United Kingdom has decided to modify the public service obligations in respect of the scheduled air services between the Orkney Mainland (Kirkwall) and the islands of Westray, Sanday, Stronsay and Eday as set out in the notice published in the Official Journal of the European Communities C 363 of 19 December 2001, pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes.

2. The modified public service obligations are as follows:

- Minimum frequencies:

To Westray - 2 return trips per day Monday to Saturday all year round.

To Sanday - 2 return trips per day Monday to Saturday all year round.

To Stronsay - 2 return trips per day Monday to Saturday all year round.

To Eday - 2 return trips on Wednesday all year round.

- Capacity:

The capacity of the aircraft used should be not less than eight passenger seats on each route.

- Fares:

The price of a single adult fare must not exceed GBP 31 on each route.

The maximum fare on each route may be increased once every year with the prior written consent of Orkney Islands Council in line with the United Kingdom's Retail Price Index (all items) or any successor index to this.

No other changes may be made to the fare levels without the prior written consent of Orkney Islands Council.

The new maximum fare on each route must be notified to the Civil Aviation Authority and to the European Commission which may then publish them in the Official Journal of the European Union.
#### Frank Stanley NIX, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 17254.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 17, 1958.

*694Dawson Kea, Dublin, Ga., W. W. Larsen, Dublin, Ga., E. L. Rowland, Wrightsville, Ga. (Larsen & Larsen, Dublin, Ga., on the brief), for appellant.

Joseph H. Davis, Asst. U. S. Atty., Macon, Ga. (Frank 0. Evans, U. S. Atty., Floyd M. Buford, Asst. U. S. Atty., Macon, Ga., on the brief), for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted upon all five counts of an indictment which charged possession and operation of an illegal still and the possession of untaxed liquor. By his appeal he asserts that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain the conviction. No evidence was received over objection. No motion for judgment of acquittal was made. No exceptions were taken to the instructions given and no additional instructions were requested. Nothing has been preserved for review. Tomley v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 250 F.2d 549. It does not appear that there has been any miscarriage of justice that requires us to invoke Rule 52(b), Fed.Rules Crim.Proc. 18 U.S.C.A. Thompson v. United States, 5 Cir., 245 F.2d 232.

The judgment is Affirmed.
#### The Wire and Telephone Company of America, Respondent, *v.*Waterbury Company, Appellant.

*Wire & Telephone Co. of America*v. *Waterbury Co.,*137 App. Div. 939, affirmed.

(Argued May 16, 1911;

decided May 30, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 29, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for goods alleged to have been sold and delivered.

*Edmund J. Wager*for appellant.

*John D. McMahon*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A.
Morrissey, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ John A. Morrissey
-----------------------------
Name:  John A. Morrissey
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 26, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





                                       40
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, October 12, 1995 (127), Para 127.22 Civilian Science Research Authorization]
[Page 1514]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.127.22  civilian science research authorization

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaHOOD, pursuant to House Resolution 234 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the further consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 2405) to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 1996 
and 1997 for civilian science activities of the Federal Government, and 
for other purposes.
  Mr. KINGSTON, Chairman of the Committee of the Whole, resumed the 
chair; and after some time spent therein,
```
**EXHIBIT 99. 4**     For fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, KPMG LLP and itsaffiliates were paid by Cameco Corporation and its subsidiaries the following fees:           **2005**  **2004** **Audit fees:**        Cameco — audit $389,000  $386,000 Cameco — securities  100,000   — Centerra — audit  574,800   400,500 Centerra — securities  —   275,000          $1,063,800  $1,061,500          **Audit — related fees:**        Bruce Power Reorganization $70,000   — SOX 404 Scoping Project  35,000  $75,000 Translation services  10,000   9,000 Accounting disclosure  —   14,000 Pensions and other  7,500   10,700          $122,500  $108,700          **Tax:**        Compliance $160,400  $83,800 Planning and advice  36,400   55,400          $196,800  $139,200          **All other fees:**           —   —                 **Total** $1,383,100  $1,309,400             Pre-Approval Policies and ProceduresAs part of Cameco’s corporate governance practices, under Cameco’s audit committee charter, theaudit committee is required to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by theexternal auditors. Unless a type of service is to be provided by the external auditors receivesgeneral pre-approval, it requires specific pre-approval by Cameco’s audit committee or auditcommittee chair, or in the absence of the audit committee chair, a member of the audit committee asdesignated by the audit committee. All pre-approvals granted pursuant to the delegated authoritymust be presented by the member(s) who granted the pre-approvals to the full audit committee at itsnext meeting. The audit committee has adopted a written policy to provide procedures to implementthe foregoing principles.
From: wellsprings@frontiernet.net [mailto:wellsprings@frontiernet.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 8:33 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Linnette Dooley 

435 Roadrunner Drive 

Patterson, CA 95363