alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AIR-16-0003-E February 8, 2016 Exemption No. 9669D Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-8898

Ms. Caitlin M. Randles Manager, FAA Coordination Boeing Flight Test Engineering The Boeing Company

P.O. Box 3707 Seattle, WA 98124-2207

Dear Ms. Randles:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9669, as amended. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated October 7, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of The Boeing Company (Boeing) for an extension of Exemption No. 9669, as amended. That exemption from § 21.197 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Boeing to conduct flight crew training in aircraft operated under a special flight permit issued for production flight testing of new aircraft.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Boeing.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9669, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest.2

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant The Boeing Company (Boeing) an exemption from 14 CFR § 21.197 to conduct flight crew tr aining in aircraft operated under a special flight permit issued for production flight testing of new aircraft, subject to the conditions and

limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. All pilot flight crews in training under this exemption must be Boeing employees.

2. Each special flight permit incorporating the provisions of this exemption will be effective only for the period of time specified in the permit and only so long as the aircraft are owned, operated, and registered by Boeing.

3. Flight training performed under this exemption will not serve to meet the requirements of 14 CFR part 121 or 135.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9669, as amended, to March 31, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

//s//

Dorenda D. Baker Director, Aircraft Certification Service
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CHIRONCORPORATION**

 

*SECTION 1350CERTIFICATION*

 

In connection with theperiodic report of **CHIRON CORPORATION, aDelaware corporation** (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), I,**DAVID V. SMITH, ChiefFinancial Officer** of the Company, hereby certify as of the datehereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of theUnited States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2)          the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

This Certification hasnot been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.

 
| Date: April 6,  2005 | By:    | /s/  DAVID V.  SMITH                     | ** ** |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|------------|
|                      |   | **DAVID  V. SMITH**                                |
|                      |   | **Vice  President and****Chief Financial Officer** |

 

----
From: Mann, Lisa [mailto:lmann@renfrewcenter.com] 

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 3:29 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Mental Health Parity

Please see our attached comments for your review. 

Lisa Mann, LSW

Insurance Manager, The Renfrew Center

475 Spring Lane

Philadelphia, PA 19128

Internal Extension: 3080

Phone: 215-254-1609

Fax: 215-482-1761

Confidentiality Notice: This E-Mail is intended only for the use of the Individual or entity to which it is 

addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure 

under applicable law. If you have received this communication in error, please do not distribute, 

notify the sender by E-Mail at the address shown above, then delete the original message with 

any attachments. Thank you for your compliance.
To Whom It May Concern: 

The Renfrew Center has been treating women with eating disorders for twenty five years. 

In those twenty five years we have seen many changes in the health insurance field and 

we have seen many women who are unable to access treatment due to the structure of 

their health insurance plans. We are very hopeful that the new parity legislation will 

allow for thorough and effective treatment, but we do have some concerns. 

We are concerned that the definition of ‘mental health conditions’ leaves room for the 

exclusion of certain diagnoses. Currently, individual states that have mental health parity 

or mandates often list a group of diagnoses they consider deserving of parity, labeled 

“biologically based” or “serious mental” illnesses, and the rest of the mental illnesses are 

not included under the parity law. We would like to insure that eating disorders are 

considered serious mental illnesses and are considered biologically based. 

Although the elimination of the day and dollar limitation disparity between medical and 

mental health appears to be a solution to treatment barriers, this new parity law still 

allows insurance companies to determine whether or not a patient’s treatment is 

medically necessary. We believe this parity law should insure that insurance/managed 

care companies use medical necessity criteria as set forth by the professionals in the field, 

i.e. The American Psychiatric Association. 

Thank you for considering our comments. 

Sincerely, 

The Renfrew Center for Eating Disorders
-----Original Message----- 

From: nursekitty83@yahoo.com [mailto:nursekitty83@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:45 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Robyn Cleaves 

PO Box 65366 

University Place, WA 98464
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, October 13, 1995 (128), Para 128.6 Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Pages 1528-1529]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.128.6  public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 5 of rule X and clause 4 of rule XXII, public bills and 
resolutions were introduced and severally referred as follows:

           By Mr. QUINN:
       H.R. 2480. A bill to establish an Office of Inspector 
     General for the Medicare and Medicaid Programs; to the 
     Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, and in addition 
     to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Commerce, for a 
     period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 
     case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
     jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
           By Mrs. SEASTRAND (for herself, Mr. Gilchrest, Mr. Cox, 
             Ms. Dunn of

             Washington, Mr. Davis, Mr. Saxton, Mr. Cunningham, 
             Mr. Oxley, Mr. Dornan, Mr. Hoke, Mr. Tiahrt, Mr. 
             Barton of Texas, Mr. Walker, Mr. Baker of California, 
             Mr. Lewis of California, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mrs. Kelly, 
             Mr. Kim, Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. Livingston, Mr. 
             Taylor of North Carolina, Mr. McKeon, Mr. Bilbray, 
             Mr. King, Mr. Herger, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Barrett of 
             Nebraska, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. Laughlin, Mr. 
             Knollenberg, Mr. Moorhead, Mr. Hastert, Mr. Cooley, 
             Mr. Radanovich, Mrs. Chenoweth, Mrs. Cubin, Mr. 
             Doolittle, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Horn, and Mr. Riggs):
       H.R. 2481. A bill to designate the Federal Triangle project 
     under construction at 14th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, 
     NW, in the District of Columbia, as the ``Ronald Reagan 
     Building and International Trade Center''; to the Committee 
     on Transportation and Infrastructure.
           By Mr. PALLONE:
       H.R. 2482. A bill to require States to consider adopting 
     mandatory, comprehensive,

[[Page 1529]]

     statewide one-call notification systems to protect 
     underground facilities from being damaged by any excavations, 
     and for other purposes; to the Committee on Commerce.
           By Mr. HOKE:
       H. Con. Res. 107. Concurrent resolution urging a home field 
     advantage in the major league baseball league championship 
     series; to the Committee on Commerce.
```
Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David H. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Thomas L. Redding, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David H. GillDavid H. Gill, President and C.E.O.(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Thomas L. ReddingThomas L. Redding, C.F.O.(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


Date: November 7, 2006
|EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-102008 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 13, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation and its subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of a new accounting standard in 2006), relating to the consolidated financial statement schedules, and relating to management's report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
March 13, 2007
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 34.4





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of FirstEnergy Service Company:





We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying “Report on assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Asset-Backed Securities”, that FirstEnergy Service Company (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the asset-backed securities transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving phase-in recovery property (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2013 and for the period from June 20, 2013 to December 31, 2013, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform or the servicing activities are applicable to the Platform but are excluded from the scope of management's assertion and are not reported on herein.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2013 and for the period from June 20, 2013 to December 31, 2013 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.








/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





March 31, 2014
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.29    
    


 
 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO WARRANT    
    


        This Amendment No. 2 to Warrant is made and entered into as of the 30th day of December, 2005, by and among Digital Generation Systems, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), and Omar A. Choucair ("Choucair"). 


        WHEREAS,
the Corporation and Choucair entered into that certain Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated as of August 25, 2003, as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 to
Warrant dated on or about June 24, 2004 (the "Warrant"); and 


        WHEREAS,
the Corporation and Choucair wish to amend the terms of the Warrant as described herein; 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, benefits and covenants herein contained, the Corporation and Choucair hereby agree as follows: 


        1.     Unless
otherwise defined, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Warrant. All references to Section herein shall be to Sections
of the Warrant. 


        2.     The
first sentence of Section 7 in the Warrant shall read as follows: 




"This
Warrant shall expire and be void at the earlier of (i) the close of business on December 31, 2010 or (ii) the closing of an offering of shares of the Company's capital stock
to the public at any time after the date of this Warrant pursuant to a registration statement filed with and declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 5
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended." 


  





[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]








        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 2 to Warrant as of the date first above written. 



	 	 	DIGITAL GENERATION SYSTEMS, INC.
	

 	
 	

By:	

/s/  SCOTT K. GINSBURG      
	 	 	 	 	
 Scott K. Ginsburg

Chief Executive Officer
	

 	
 	

CHOUCAIR:
	

 	
 	

/s/  OMAR A. CHOUCAIR      
 Omar A. Choucair, individually















QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.29


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO WARRANT
----

 

| CLECO CORPORATION  | EXHIBIT 32(a) |
|-------------------------|---------------|

| Cleco Corporation                              |
|------------------------------------------------|
| CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO                     |
| 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,                       |
| AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO                        |
| SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 |

    In connection with the Annual Report of ClecoCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Michael H. Madison, President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, and I, Kathleen F. Nolen, Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                                      |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the  Company. |

 

| /s/  Michael H. Madison                                                   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Michael H.  Madison       President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

| /s/  Kathleen F. Nolen                                                                                     |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Kathleen F.  Nolen       Senior Vice President and        Chief Financial Officer |

----
#### § 236.565 Provision made for preventing operation of pneumatic brake-applying apparatus by double-heading cock; requirement.

Where provision is made for preventing the operation of the pneumatic brake-applying appartus of an automatic train stop or train control device when the double-heading cock is placed in double-heading position, the automatic train stop or train control device shall not be cut out before communication is closed between the engineman's automatic brake valve and the brake pipe, when operating double-heading cock toward double-heading position.
§ 236.203 Hand operated crossover between main tracks; protection. At hand-operated crossover between main tracks, protection shall be provided by one of the following: ( a ) An arrangement of one or more track circuits and switch circuit controllers,
( b ) Facing point locks on both switches of the crossover, with both locks operated by a single lever, or
( c ) Electric locking of the switches of the crossover. Signals governing movements over either switch shall display their most restrictive aspect when any of the following conditions exist: ( 1 ) Where protection is provided by one or more track circuits and switch circuit controllers, and either switch is open or the crossover is occupied by a train, locomotive or car in such a manner as to foul the main track. It shall not be a violation of this requirement where the presence of sand, rust, dirt, grease or other foreign matter on the rail prevents effective shunting;
( 2 ) Where facing point locks with a single lever are provided, and either switch is unlocked;
( 3 ) Where the switches are electrically locked, before the electric locking releases.
**Exhibit No. 32.1**

 

 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PHI GROUP, INC. on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Henry Fahman, President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ Henry Fahman

Henry Fahman

President/Director 

February 22, 2011

 

 

----