alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 238.233 Interior fittings and surfaces. ( a ) Each seat in a passenger car shall— ( 1 ) Be securely fastened to the car body so as to withstand an individually applied acceleration of 4g acting in the lateral direction and 4g acting in the upward vertical direction on the deadweight of the seat or seats, if held in tandem; and
( 2 ) Have an attachment to the car body of an ultimate strength capable of resisting simultaneously: ( i ) The longitudinal inertial force of 8g acting on the mass of the seat; and
( ii ) The load associated with the impact into the seatback of an unrestrained 95th-percentile adult male initially seated behind the seat, when the floor to which the seat is attached decelerates with a triangular crash pulse having a peak of 8g and a duration of 250 milliseconds.
( b ) Overhead storage racks in a passenger car shall provide longitudinal and lateral restraint for stowed articles. Overhead storage racks shall be attached to the car body with sufficient strength to resist loads due to the following individually applied accelerations acting on the mass of the luggage stowed as determined by the railroad: ( 1 ) Longitudinal: 8g;
( 2 ) Vertical: 4g; and
( 3 ) Lateral: 4g.
( c ) Other interior fittings within a passenger car shall be attached to the car body with sufficient strength to withstand the following individually applied accelerations acting on the mass of the fitting: ( 1 ) Longitudinal: 8g;
( 2 ) Vertical: 4g; and
( 3 ) Lateral: 4g.
( d ) To the extent possible, all interior fittings in a passenger car, except seats, shall be recessed or flush-mounted.
( e ) Sharp edges and corners in a locomotive cab and a passenger car shall be either avoided or padded to mitigate the consequences of an impact with such surfaces.
( f ) Locomotives required to be constructed in accordance with subpart D of part 229 of this chapter shall have cab seat attachment in compliance with § 229.206 of this chapter, in lieu of the following requirements of this paragraph. Each seat provided for a crewmember regularly assigned to occupy the cab of a locomotive and each floor-mounted seat in the cab shall be secured to the car body with an attachment having an ultimate strength capable of withstanding the loads due to the following individually applied accelerations acting on the combined mass of the seat and a 95th-percentile adult male occupying it: ( 1 ) Longitudinal: 8g;
( 2 ) Lateral: 4g; and
( 3 ) Vertical: 4g.
( g ) If, for purposes of showing compliance with the requirements of this section, the strength of a seat attachment is to be demonstrated through sled testing, the seat structure and seat attachment to the sled that is used in such testing must be representative of the actual seat structure in, and seat attachment to, the rail vehicle subject to the requirements of this section. If the attachment strength of any other interior fitting is to be demonstrated through sled testing, for purposes of showing compliance with the requirements of this section, such testing shall be conducted in a similar manner.
[64 FR 25660, May 12, 1999, as amended at 71 FR 36917, June 28, 2006]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, November 6, 1995 (140), Para 140.6 Senate Bill Referred]
[Page 1873]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.140.6  senate bill referred

  A bill of the Senate of the following title was taken from the 
Speaker's table and, under the rule, referred as follows:

       S. 1097. An Act to designate the Federal building located 
     at 1550 Dewey Avenue, Baker City, Oregon, as the ``David J. 
     Wheeler Federal Building,'' and for other purposes; to the 
     Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

  And then,
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The siskiyou County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Yreka, California, August 20, 2007. The meeting will include routine business and a presentation on the Community Wildfire Protection Plan by the Fire Safe Council of Siskiyou County. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held August 20, 2007, from 4 p.m. until 5:30 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Yreka High School Library, Preece Way, Yreka California. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Bob Talley, Forest RAC coordinator, Klamath National Forest, (530) 841-4423 or electronically at                         *rtalley@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Public comment opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time. 

Dated: July 30, 2007. 

Margaret J. Boland, 

Designated Federal Official. 

[FR Doc. 07-3825 Filed 8-3-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Order entered May 3, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00210-CV

STEVEN PHILLIPS, Appellant

V.

TRACI TUCKER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-03974

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s May 1, 2013 unopposed motion for leave to file an amended 

brief. We ORDER the amended brief tendered to this Court by appellant on May 1, 2013 filed 

as of the date of this order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
October 20, 2010 page of



### INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT (IRExR)
Chemical ID: P-09-0480 Reviewer: Sherer/BC

Results Table: Dose, Concentration, and Days Exceeded Results Summary

Exposure Scenario 1 Water Landfill Stack Air Fugitive Air Drinking Water Fish Ingestion ADR LADD ADR LADD 7Q10 4 CC = 100 PDM Days Exceede d LADD ADR LADD ADR LADD

Release activity(ies) 2 ; exposure calculation(s) 3 mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day μg/l # Days mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day

Use 2: Max ADR Use 2: Max LADD

1 Exposure scenario titles consist of release activity followed by exposure calculation abbreviation. 2 Release activities are from engineering report's Manuf acturing (Mfg), Processing (Proc) and Use release activity labels. Multiple release activities are combined in one exposure scenario if their releases occur at same location. 3 Exposure calculations are Acute Dose Rate (A DR), Lifetime Average Daily Dose (LADD), and Probabilistic Dilution Model (PDM). There may be one, two, or all three exposure calculations per exposure scenario. CC is the aquatic concentration of concern. 4 This column displays concentration values for the 7Q 10 streamflow, which is defined as the average daily streamflow of the seven consecutive days of lowest flow within a ten year period.

Remarks: 7October 20, 2010 page of

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-09-0480 Assessor: Sherer/BC
ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES
Scenario#:1 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: Use 2: Max ADR Release Description: WATER LANDFILL Non-sludge/Sludge STACK FUGITIVE

Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Non-sludge/Sludge Release Days/yr:
Per Site Release: (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day)

Remarks:October 20, 2010 page of

INITIAL REVIEW EX POSURE REPORT Chemical ID: P-09-0480October 20, 2010 page ofOctober 20, 2010 page of

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-09-0480 Assessor: Sherer/BC
ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES
Scenario#:2 Number of Release Sites Release Activity: Use 2: Max LADD Release Description: WATER LANDFILL Non-sludge/Sludge STACK FUGITIVE

Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

No n- sludge/Sludge Release Days/yr:
Per Site Release: (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day)

Remarks:October 20, 2010 page of

INITIAL REVIEW EX POSURE REPORT Chemical ID: P-09-0480October 20, 2010 page of
§ 237.1 Application. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section, this part applies to all owners of railroad track with a gage of two feet or more and which is supported by a bridge.
( b ) This part does not apply to bridges on track used exclusively for rapid transit operations in an urban area that are not connected with the general railroad system of transportation.
( c ) This part does not apply to bridges located within an installation which is not part of the general railroad system of transportation and over which trains are not operated by a railroad.
#### § 236.764 Locking, lever operated.

The mechanical locking of an interlocking machine which is actuated by means of the lever.
#### § 209.315 Subpoenas.

Once a notice of proposed disqualification has been issued in a particular matter, only the presiding officer may issue, deny, quash, or modify subpoenas under this subpart in accordance with § 209.7.
#### § 236.803 Signal, approach.

A roadway signal used to govern the approach to another signal and if operative so controlled that its indication furnishes advance information of the indication of the next signal.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

98-1733.

#### State ex rel. Licking Cty. v. Licking Mem. Hosp.

This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of the applications for dismissal of The Advocate and Licking County, Ohio,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the applications for dismissal be, and hereby are, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
§ 178.348-4 Pressure relief. ( a ) Each cargo tank must be equipped with a pressure and vacuum relief system in accordance with § 178.345-10 and this section.
( b ) *Type and construction.* Vacuum relief devices are not required for cargo tanks designed to be loaded by vacuum or built to withstand full vacuum.
( c ) *Pressure settings of relief valves.* The setting of the pressure relief devices must be in accordance with § 178.345-10(d), except as provided in paragraph (d)(3) of this section.
( d ) *Venting capacities.* ( 1 ) The vacuum relief system must limit the vacuum to less than 80 percent of the design vacuum capability of the cargo tank.
( 2 ) If pressure loading or unloading devices are provided, the pressure relief system must have adequate vapor and liquid capacity to limit tank pressure to the cargo tank test pressure at the maximum loading or unloading rate. The maximum loading and unloading rates must be included on the metal specification plate.
( 3 ) Cargo tanks used in dedicated service for materials classed as corrosive material, with no secondary hazard, may have a total venting capacity which is less than required by § 178.345-10(e). The minimum total venting capacity for these cargo tanks must be determined in accordance with the following formula (use of approximate values given for the formula is acceptable): Formula in Nonmetric Units
Q = 37,980,000 A0.82 (ZT)0.5 / (LC)(M0.5) Where: Q = The total required venting capacity, in cubic meters of air per hour at standard conditions of 15.6 °C and 1 atm (cubic feet of air per hour at standard conditions of 60 °F and 14.7 psia); T = The absolute temperature of the vapor at the venting conditions—degrees Kelvin (°C + 273) [degrees Rankine (°F + 460)]; A = The exposed surface area of tank shell—square meters (square feet); L = The latent heat of vaporization of the lading—calories per gram (BTU/lb); Z = The compressibility factor for the vapor (if this factor is unknown, let Z equal 1.0); M = The molecular weight of vapor; C = A constant derived from (K), the ratio of specific heats of the vapor. If (K) is unknown, let C = 315. C = 520[K(2/(K ++ 1))[(K + 1)/(K−1)]]0.5 Where: K = Cp / Cv Cp = The specific heat at constant pressure, in -calories per gram degree centigrade (BTU/lb °F.); and Cv = The specific heat at constant volume, in -calories per gram degree centigrade (BTU/lb °F.).
[Amdt. 178-89, 54 FR 25032, June 12, 1989, as amended at 55 FR 37065, Sept. 7, 1990; Amdt. 178-104, 59 FR 49135, Sept. 26, 1994. Redesignated by Amdt. 178-112, 61 FR 18934, Apr. 29, 1996; 72 FR 55696, Oct. 1, 2007; 72 FR 59146, Oct. 18, 2007]
###### Editorial Note on Part 195

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.204 Inspection—general.

Inspection must be provided to ensure that the installation of pipe or pipeline systems is in accordance with the requirements of this subpart. Any operator personnel used to perform the inspection must be trained and qualified in the phase of construction to be inspected. An operator must not use operator personnel to perform a required inspection if the operator personnel performed the construction task requiring inspection. Nothing in this section prohibits the operator from inspecting construction tasks with operator personnel who are involved in other construction tasks.

[Amdt. 195-100, 80 FR 12780, Mar. 11, 2015]
SERVED: SEPTEMBER 24, 2012 

.... , ,,.. .. ·~···,\f1T1 ,,,lh+ / lrc··NT .... OF . ...•:.J l"l. \, rw .. j 

· , :~:/J .. JSPORTATION 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.·~, :;(Cf t)pr:n,~-fjQI•IS OFFICE OF HEARINGS ... ·.' L, L Ln,·l . '~ ,.~ 

WASIDNGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

JOHN CROFT 

FAA DOCKET NO .. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0903 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

. This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011NM730130) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings ~nd other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons o.n the attached Service List. 

Attachment- Service List
The Honorable Kathleen McDonald O’Malley, United States District Judge for the Northern *

District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 07a0427n.06

Filed: June 20, 2007

No. 06-3430

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

SPEEDY MULCH LLC; DANIEL SPEEDY,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DONALD J. GADD; VILLAGE OF

BYESVILLE,

Defendants-Appellees.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Before: ROGERS, COOK, Circuit Judges; and O’MALLEY, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM. Speedy Mulch LLC and Daniel Speedy appeal the district court’s grant of

summary judgment to the defendants Donald Gadd and the Village of Byesville. Having reviewed

the record and the applicable law, and having the benefit of oral argument and the parties’ briefs, we

determine that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion. We affirm the district

court’s decision largely for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion with a caveat about the court’s

treatment of the plaintiffs’ First Amendment retaliation claim. The plaintiffs alleged that Mayor

Gadd retaliated against them because Speedy spoke out against him and supported an opposing

candidate for mayor. According to the plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, this retaliation took the form
No. 06-3430

Speedy Mulch LLC, et al. v. Gadd, et al. 

- 2 -

of “a taking of Plaintiffs’ personal and real property interests with threats of a lawsuit.” As the

district court correctly recognized, a “retaliation claim essentially entails three elements: (1) the

plaintiff engaged in protected conduct; (2) an adverse action was taken against the plaintiff that

would deter a person of ordinary firmness from continuing to engage in that conduct; and (3) there

is a causal connection between elements one and two—that is, the adverse action was motivated at

least in part by the plaintiff’s protected conduct.” Thaddeus-X v. Blatter, 175 F.3d 378, 394 (6th Cir.

1999). Our review confirms that the plaintiffs met the first two prongs of this test—Speedy engaged

in protected conduct, and the plaintiffs demonstrate opposition by a government official that would

deter a person of ordinary firmness from speaking. To the extent that the district court’s opinion can

be read to require the plaintiffs to show that the opposition deterred Speedy in a subjective sense,

we do not endorse its view. Nevertheless, as the district court properly concluded, the plaintiffs are

unable to meet their burden to demonstrate any causal nexus between Speedy’s speech and the

defendants’ actions. The record does not support the conclusion that the allegedly retaliatory lawsuit

stemmed from anything other than a business dispute unrelated to Speedy’s speech.

We affirm the district court’s judgment for the reasons set forth above.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2302

To amend the Federal Power Act to provide for the delegation of dam

safety authority to State government.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 12, 1995

Mr. GALLEGLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Federal Power Act to provide for the

delegation of dam safety authority to State government.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DELEGATION OF DAM SAFETY AUTHORITY

4 UNDER FEDERAL POWER ACT.

5 Section 10(c) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C.

6 803(c)) is amended by adding the following after the first

7 sentence thereof: ‘‘Upon the request of the Governor of

8 any State, the Commission shall permit the State to regu9 late the safety of any project works unless the Commission
2

•HR 2302 IH

1 determines that the State does not have an adequate dam

2 safety program.’’.

Æ
#### Henry Hoffman, *Appellant, v.*William S. Marrin and others *Respondents.*

Order granting stay affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
-----Original Message-----

From: laura king [mailto:lauraking7390@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 9:26 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210 - AB3

Please pass the new Fiduciary Rule bill. From what I see around me, it is sorely needed.

Laura king

Sent from my iPad
§ 31.18 Authority of the ALJ. ( a ) The ALJ shall conduct a fair and impartial hearing, avoid delay, maintain order, and assure that a record of the proceeding is made.
( b ) The ALJ has the authority to— ( 1 ) Set and change the date, time, and place of the hearing upon reasonable notice to the parties;
( 2 ) Continue or recess the hearing in whole or in part for a reasonable period of time;
( 3 ) Hold conferences to identify or simplify the issues, or to consider other matters that may aid in the expeditious disposition of the proceeding;
( 4 ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( 5 ) Issue subpoenas requiring the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents at depositions or at hearings;
( 6 ) Rule on motions and other procedural matters;
( 7 ) Regulate the scope and timing of discovery;
( 8 ) Regulate the course of the hearing and the conduct of representatives and parties;
( 9 ) Examine witnesses;
( 10 ) Receive, rule on, exclude, or limit evidence;
( 11 ) Upon motion of a party, take official notice of facts;
( 12 ) Upon motion of a party, decide cases, in whole or in part, by summary judgment where there is no disputed issue of material fact;
( 13 ) Conduct any conference, argument, or hearing on motions in person or by telephone; and
( 14 ) Exercise such other authority as is necessary to carry out the responsibilities of the ALJ under this part.
( c ) The ALJ does not have the authority to find Federal statutes or regulations invalid.
§ 230.19 Posting of FRA Form No. 1 and FRA Form No. 3. ( a ) *FRA Form No. 1.* The steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall place a copy of the 31 and 92 service day inspection report (FRA Form No. 1), properly filled out, under transparent cover in a conspicuous place in the cab of the steam locomotive before the inspected boiler is put into service. This FRA Form No. 1 will not be required for the first 31 service days following an annual inspection and the posting of an FRA Form No. 3. (See appendix B of this part.)
( b ) *FRA Form No. 3.* In addition to the FRA Form No. 1, the steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall also maintain in the cab a current copy of FRA Form No. 3 in the manner described in paragraph (a) of this section. (See appendix C of this part.)
Exhibit 3

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kevin L. Cornwell, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

|(1) |  | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Kevin L.
CornwellKevin L.CornwellChief Executive OfficerAugust 5, 2005

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### § 29.420 Is a Tribe entitled to enter into facility leases from the Department and to receive facility support costs?

A Tribe is not entitled to enter into facility leases with the Department and receive facility support costs. A funding agreement will not provide additional funds for facility leases and facility support costs to carry out PSFAs. However, facility leases and facility support costs may be an eligible and allowable use of funds a Tribe receives under a funding agreement.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 26, 1995 (102), Para 102.11 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1195]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.102.11  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. MOLLOHAN:

       On page 24, line 13, strike ``$475,000,000'' and insert 
     ``$505,000,000''.
       On page 24, line 18, strike ``$300,000,000'' and insert 
     ``$270,000,000''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

171

negative

Nays

256
```