alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, October 20, 1995 (132), Para 132.3 Message from the Senate]
[Pages 1570-1571]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.132.3  message from the senate

  A message from the Senate by Mr. Lundregan, one of its clerks, 
announced that the Senate had passed with amendments in which the 
concurrence of the House is requested, a bill of the House of the 
following title:

       H.R. 1617. An Act to consolidate and reform workforce 
     development and literacy programs, and for other purposes.

  The message also announced that the Senate insists upon its amendments 
to the bill (H.R. 1617) ``An Act to consolidate and reform workforce 
development and literacy programs, and for other purposes'', requests a 
conference with the House on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses 
thereon, and appoints Mrs. Kassebaum, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Coats, Mr. 
Gregg, Mr. Frist, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Ashcroft, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Gorton, Mr. 
Kennedy, Mr. Pell, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Simon, Mr. Harkin, Ms. Mikulski, and 
Mr. Wellstone to be the conferees on the part of the Senate.
  The message also announced that the Senate insists upon its amendment 
to the bill (H.R. 2126) ``An Act making appropriations for the 
Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and 
for other purposes'', agrees to a further conference asked by the House 
on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses thereon, and appoints Mr. 
Stevens, Mr. Cochran,

[[Page 1571]]

Mr. Specter, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Bond, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Mack, Mr. 
Shelby, Mr. Gregg, Mr. Hatfield, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Hollings, Mr. Johnston, 
Mr. Byrd, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Bumpers, Mr. Lautenberg, and Mr. Harkin, to be 
the conferees on the part of the Senate.

  The message also announced that the Senate had passed bills of the 
following titles, in which the concurrence of the House is requested:

       S. 868. An Act to provide authority for leave transfer for 
     Federal employees who are adversely affected by disasters or 
     emergencies, and for other purposes;
       S. 1048. An Act to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 
     1996 to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for 
     human space flight; science, aeronautics, and technology; 
     mission support; and Inspector General; and for other 
     purposes; and
       S. 1309. An Act to reauthorize the tied aid credit program 
     of the Export-Import Bank of the United States, and to allow 
     the Export-Import Bank to conduct a demonstration project.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 24, 1995 (133), Para 133.38 Discharge of Committees]
[Page 1587]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.133.38  discharge of committees

  Under clause 5 of rule X, the following action was taken by the 
Speaker:

       H.R. 1020. The Committees on Resources and the Budget 
     discharged from further consideration. Referred to the 
     Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union.
```
EX-10.5 Unqualified Deferred Compensation Plan



 







Exhibit 10.5




UNFUNDED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

PLAN FOR THE DIRECTORS OF

PEOPLES BANK SB




     The provisions of the plan are as follows:


1. Each director may elect on or before December 31st of any year to defer all or a
specified portion of his annual fees for succeeding calendar years.



2. Any person elected to fill a vacancy on the board, and who was not a director on the preceding
December 31st, may elect, before his term begins, to defer all or a specified part of
his annual fees for the balance of the calendar year following such election and for succeeding
calendar years. No deferrals may be made after December 31, 2004.



3.
Interest on the deferred fees is to be computed at the annual rate of
         %
compounded quarterly.



4. Amounts deferred under the plan, together with accumulated interest, will be distributed in
annual installments over a ten year period beginning with the first day of the calendar year
immediately following the year in which the director ceases to be a director.



5. An election to defer fees shall continue from year to year unless terminated by the director by
written request. In the event a director elects to terminate deferring fees, the amount already
deferred cannot be paid to him until he ceases to be a director.



6. In the event the director ceases to be a voting member of the Board of Directors of the Bank, or
if he becomes a proprietor, officer, partner, employee or otherwise becomes affiliated with any
business that is in competition with corporation, the entire balance of his deferred fees,
including interest, may, if directed by the Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, be paid
immediately to him in a lump sum.



7. Upon the death of a director or former director prior to the expiration of the period
during which the deferred amounts are payable, the balance of the deferred fees and interest in his
account shall be payable to his estate or designated beneficiary in full on the first day of the
calendar year, following the year in which he dies.




39









 








ELECTION TO PARTICIPATE IN UNFUNDED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN




     Certificates acknowledged and attested and inserted herewith to become apart of these minutes.



     Adopted by the Board of Directors this 16th day of November 2005, and made effective January
1, 2005.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Attested by:

	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	/s/ David A. Bochnowski

	 	 	/s/ Jon E. DeGuilio	 	 
	 	 

	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Chairman & CEO

	 	 	Corporate Secretary	 	 






40
-----Original Message----- 

From: tony.escobar21@gmail.com [mailto:tony.escobar21@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 4:42 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Tony Escobar 

16630 Avery St. 

Conroe, TX 77302
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 844

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to provide that annuities

paid by States to blind veterans shall be disregarded in determining

supplemental security income benefits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 2001

Mr. REYNOLDS (for himself, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. LAFALCE,

Mrs. KELLY, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. SWEENEY, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. MEEKS

of New York, Mr. QUINN, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New

York, Mr. GRUCCI, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. GILMAN, Mr.

FOSSELLA, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. ENGEL, and Ms. SLAUGHTER) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and

Means

A BILL

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to provide

that annuities paid by States to blind veterans shall

be disregarded in determining supplemental security income benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 844 IH

1 SECTION 1. STATE ANNUITIES FOR BLIND VETERANS TO BE

2 DISREGARDED IN DETERMINING SUPPLE3 MENTAL SECURITY INCOME BENEFITS.

4 (a) INCOME DISREGARD.—Section 1612(b) of the So5 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382a(b)) is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph

7 (21);

8 (2) by striking the period at the end of para9 graph (22) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

10 (3) by adding at the end the following:

11 ‘‘(23) any annuity paid by a State to the indi12 vidual (or such spouse) on the basis of the individual

13 being a veteran (as defined in section 101 of title

14 38, United States Code) who is blind.’’.

15 (b) RESOURCE DISREGARD.—Section 1613(a) of

16 such Act (42 U.S.C. 1382b(a)) is amended—

17 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph

18 (12);

19 (2) by striking the period at the end of para20 graph (13) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

21 (3) by inserting after paragraph (13) the fol22 lowing:

23 ‘‘(14) for the month of receipt and every month

24 thereafter, any annuity paid by a State to the indi25 vidual (or such spouse) on the basis of the individual
3

•HR 844 IH

1 being a veteran (as defined in section 101 of title

2 38, United States Code) who is blind.’’.

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

4 this section shall apply to benefits paid for months begin5 ning after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
###### Editorial Note on [Part 192](/current/title-49/part-192?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at [71 FR 33406](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/71-FR-33406), June 9, 2006.

#### § 192.490 Direct assessment.

Each operator that uses direct assessment as defined in [§ 192.903](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-192.903) on an onshore transmission line made primarily of steel or iron to evaluate the effects of a threat in the first column must carry out the direct assessment according to the standard listed in the second column. These standards do not apply to methods associated with direct assessment, such as close interval surveys, voltage gradient surveys, or examination of exposed pipelines, when used separately from the direct assessment process.

| Threat | Standard1 |
| --- | --- |
| External corrosion | § 192.9252 |
| Internal corrosion in pipelines that transport dry gas | § 192.927 |
| Stress corrosion cracking | § 192.929 |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1 For lines not subject to [subpart O of this part](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/part-192/subpart-O), the terms “covered segment” and “covered pipeline segment” in [§§ 192.925](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-192.925), [192.927](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-192.927), and [192.929](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-192.929) refer to the pipeline segment on which direct assessment is performed. | |
| 2 In [§ 192.925(b)](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-192.925#p-192.925(b)), the provision regarding detection of coating damage applies only to pipelines subject to [subpart O of this part](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/part-192/subpart-O). | |

[Amdt. 192-101, [70 FR 61575](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/70-FR-61575), Oct. 25, 2005]
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0118 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Janice Stubblefield-Tave 

Address: 

17 Henshaw St 

Brighton, MA, 02135 

Email: Janicetavelicsw@aol.com 

Phone: 857-334-5557 

Organization: The Trauma Center at JRI 

General Comment 

I am writing to state my belief that that MH Parity Act should require insurers to 

cover EEG biofeedback, or neurofeedback for adults and children. Neurofeedback 

is an effective method of treating PTSD, Major Depressive Disorder, addictive 

disorders, anxiety disorders, dissociateive disorders, ADHD and other common 

and disabling mental health/health problems. There has been research on many 

aspects of this method, and more research is in process. It is confusing that 

insurers state that there is insufficient research; there are medical procedures for 

which they do not require as much research, therefore they are applying unequal 

standards to mental health treatment. 

I am a licensed clinical social worker with 26 years of experience. I am very 

excited by the quick and profound changes my clients have experienced through 

neurofeedback. I work at an internationally respected agency, The Trauma Center 

at JRI in Massachusetts, where we use neurofeedback and are beginning to 

research protocols. I also am affiliated with the Neurodevelopment Center in 

Rhode Island, where I am in an internship on neurofeedback, and I have a private 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 27, 2009 

Received: May 27, 2009 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 809b7779 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web
practice in Boston. In all settings, the lack of insurance coverage is an obstacle 

to many clients having access to this efffective therapy. 

Sincerely, 

Janice Stubblefield-Tave, MA, LICSW, ACSW
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 21, 2022

No. 04-22-00814-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.A.A., minor child

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-FLD-001240-D3

Honorable Selina Nava Mireles, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On December 5, 2022, appellant A.K.T. filed a notice of appeal challenging an order 

terminating her parental rights. The clerk’s record shows the trial court signed the order of 

termination on May 6, 2022. An appeal from an order terminating a parent-child relationship is 

governed by the rules of appellate procedure for accelerated appeals. TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4(a); see 

also TEX. FAM. CODE §109.002(a-1). In an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal must be filed 

within twenty days after the judgment or order being appealed is signed, and this deadline is not 

extended by the filing of a post-judgment motion. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b); In re K.A.F., 160 

S.W.3d 923, 928 (Tex. 2005); In re L.R.S., No. 04-20-00507-CV, 2020 WL 7365444, at *1 (Tex. 

App.—San Antonio Dec. 16, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op.) (citing In re G.S., No. 04-17-00237-CV, 

2017 WL 2457052, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio June 7, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.)). As a 

result, A.K.T.’s notice of appeal was due by May 26, 2022, or her notice of appeal and motion 

for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due fifteen days later. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 

26.3; In re K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d at 928; In re L.R.S., 2020 WL 7365444, at *1; In re G.S., 2017 

WL 2457052, at *1.

Because A.K.T. did not file her notice of appeal until December 5, 2022, it appears late.

We therefore order A.K.T. to show cause in writing by January 5, 2023 why this appeal should 

not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b). If appellant fails to 

respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.3; In re K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d at 928 (affirming court of appeals dismissing parental 

termination for lack of jurisdiction when notice of appeal was untimely filed); In re L.R.S., 2020 

WL 7365444, at *1 (dismissing parental termination for lack of jurisdiction after notice of appeal 

was filed almost three months after order of termination was signed); In re G.S., 2017 WL 

2457052, at *1 (dismissing parental termination after notice of appeal was filed forty-four days 

after order of termination was signed). If a supplemental clerk’s record is required to establish 

this court’s jurisdiction, A.K.T. must ask the trial court clerk to prepare one and must notify the 

clerk of this court that such a request was made. All deadlines in this matter are suspended until 

further order of the court.
It is so ORDERED December 21, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
-----Original Message----- 

From: fred-cheryl@msn.com [mailto:fred-cheryl@msn.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:28 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Fred Lavy 

524 East Wolfe St 

Harrisonburg, VA 22802
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 5/6/15 8:43 AM

Received: May 03, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8in5-78dp

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: API

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0264

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Neal Joffee

Address: 

9760 69th Street South

Cottage Grove, MN, 55016

Email: njoffee@yahoo.com

General Comment

It is clear that American workers are not being treated fairly under the current financial industry 

policies. Please take action to ensure retirement accounts are more closely monitored and 

regulated - allowing employees to have more sound financial investment options within their 

retirement plans, without paying exorbitant fees! Please maintain the differentiation between 

Brokers and Advisors. Only the latter are true fiduciaries.

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481ac9ce8&format=xml&showor... 5/6/2015
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 27, 1995 (121), Para 121.36 Adjournment]
[Page 1458]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.121.36  adjournment

  On motion of Ms. McKinney, at 11 o'clock and 4 minutes p.m., the House 
adjourned.
```
#### Mary McCullough, *as Administratrix, etc., v.*Thomas R. Sharp, *Receiver, etc.*

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, witb costs. ' Opinion by

Barnard, F. J.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, November 2, 1995 (139), Para 139.23 Adjournment]
[Page 1871]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.139.23  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. BRYANT of Texas, pursuant to the special order 
heretofore agreed to, at 9 o'clock and 59 minutes p.m., the House 
adjourned until 12 o'clock noon on Monday, November 6, 1995.
```
#### William H. Fearing, Respondent, *v.*Van Sinderen Lindsley, Appellant.

*Fearing*v. *Lindsley,*137 App. Div. 944, appeal dismissed.

(Argued May 29, 1911;

decided June 6, 1911.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 15,1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the false representations of defendant.

The motion was made "upon the ground that the appeal was not taken within sixty days after service of a copy of the judgment of affirmance and notice of its entry.

*John Kirkland Clark*for motion.

*Wilson B. Brice*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
-----Original Message----- 

From: gilligan77837199@wmconnect.com 

[mailto:gilligan77837199@wmconnect.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:28 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Henry Bemis 

420 Division Rd 

S.Dartmouth, MA 02748
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

Nos. 09-2468; 09-2493

ANTHONY BUCCI,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on October 13, 2011, is

amended as follows:

One page 26, lines 18 through 23, replace "These differences

suggest that, in complete closure situations, counsel’s failure to

object presumptively is an unsound trial strategy, whereas in

partial closure situations, no such presumption is appropriate. 

We consider the question of ineffective assistance under the

particular facts of this case, free of any presumption." with

"These differences suggest that, in complete closure situations,

counsel’s failure to object may in general be an unsound trial

strategy, whereas in partial closure situations, no such assumption

is appropriate.

We consider the question of ineffective assistance under the

particular facts of this case, under the usual Strickland

presumption of competency."
-----Original Message----- 

From: meaghanabq@yahoo.com [mailto:meaghanabq@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 2:51 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 30, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Meaghan Nugent 

950 Santander Lane 

Santa Fe, NM 87505
From: Ray Bowditch [mailto:rbowditch@bowditch.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 9:51 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject:

Most employees are honest. However there are a few who continue to have poorly defined 

physical illnesses, and physicians are reluctant to question their actual existence. The existence 

of some mental illness will be even more difficult to ascertain, and much easier to fake should an 

employee simply not want to come to work for an extended period. 

 

We all can remember developing a very convenient stomached ache during our elementary 

school days.