alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATIONS








I, Steven R. Staub, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of FirstEnergy Ohio PIRB Special Purpose Trust 2013 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, as servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, as servicer, has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.








In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank, National Association, as Certificate Trustee and Indenture Trustee.








Date: March 29, 2024





/s/ Steven R. StaubSteven R. StaubVice President and Treasurer (Senior Officer in Charge of Servicing Function) of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, as Servicer under the Phase-In-Recovery Property Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2013, between the Servicer and CEI Funding LLC, as the Bond Issuer
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.64 National Registry of Operators. ( a ) OPID Request. Effective January 1, 2012, each operator of a hazardous liquid or carbon dioxide pipeline or pipeline facility must obtain from PHMSA an Operator Identification Number (OPID). An OPID is assigned to an operator for the pipeline or pipeline system for which the operator has primary responsibility. To obtain an OPID or a change to an OPID, an operator must complete an OPID Assignment Request DOT Form PHMSA F 1000.1 through the National Registry of Operators in accordance with § 195.58.
( b ) OPID validation. An operator who has already been assigned one or more OPID by January 1, 2011 must validate the information associated with each such OPID through the National Registry of Operators at *https://portal.phmsa.dot.gov ,* and correct that information as necessary, no later than June 30, 2012.
( c ) Changes. Each operator must notify PHMSA electronically through the National Registry of Operators at *https://portal.phmsa.dot.gov ,* of certain events. ( 1 ) An operator must notify PHMSA of any of the following events not later than 60 days before the event occurs: ( i ) Construction or any planned rehabilitation, replacement, modification, upgrade, uprate, or update of a facility, other than a section of line pipe, that costs $10 million or more. If 60 day notice is not feasible because of an emergency, an operator must notify PHMSA as soon as practicable;
( ii ) Construction of 10 or more miles of a new or replacement hazardous liquid or carbon dioxide pipeline;
( iii ) Reversal of product flow direction when the reversal is expected to last more than 30 days. This notification is not required for pipeline systems already designed for bi-directional flow; or
( iv ) A pipeline converted for service under § 195.5, or a change in commodity as reported on the annual report as required by § 195.49.
( 2 ) An operator must notify PHMSA of any following event not later than 60 days after the event occurs: ( i ) A change in the primary entity responsible (*i.e.*, with an assigned OPID) for managing or administering a safety program required by this part covering pipeline facilities operated under multiple OPIDs.
( ii ) A change in the name of the operator;
( iii ) A change in the entity (e.g., company, municipality) responsible for operating an existing pipeline, pipeline segment, or pipeline facility;
( iv ) The acquisition or divestiture of 50 or more miles of pipeline or pipeline system subject to this part; or
( v ) The acquisition or divestiture of an existing pipeline facility subject to this part.
( d ) Reporting. An operator must use the OPID issued by PHMSA for all reporting requirements covered under this subchapter and for submissions to the National Pipeline Mapping System.
[Amdt. 195-95, 75 FR 72907, Nov. 26, 2010, as amended by Amdt. 195-100, 80 FR 12780, Mar. 11, 2015; Amdt. 195-101, 82 FR 7999, Jan. 23, 2017; Amdt. 195-103, 85 FR 8127, Feb. 12, 2020]
From: karen@suggarts.com [mailto:karen@suggarts.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:55 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Karen Flittie 

1280 Apple Drive 

Concord, CA 94518
#### § 236.566 Locomotive of each train operating in train stop, train control or cab signal territory; equipped.

The locomotive from which brakes are controlled, of each train operating in automatic train stop, train control, or cab signal territory shall be equipped with apparatus responsive to the roadway equipment installed on all or any part of the route traversed, and such apparatus shall be in operative condition.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 9, 1995 (62), Para 62.10 Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation]
[Page 636]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.62.10  atlantic striped bass conservation

  Mr. SAXTON moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 1139) to 
amend the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act, and for other 
purposes; as amended.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EWING, recognized Mr. SAXTON and Mr. 
STUDDS, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill, as amended?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EWING, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said bill, as amended, was passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and 
said bill, as amended, was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the 
table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.
```
FOR PUBLICATION 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GINA FIORE; KEITH GIPSON,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

ANTHONY WALDEN; UNKNOWN

AGENTS OF THE FEDERAL

GOVERNMENT,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-17558

D.C. No. 

2:07-cv-01674-

ECR-LRL

ORDER

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 

Filed April 18, 2014

Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Marsha S. Berzon, and 

Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

On February 25, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United

States issued an opinion reversing this Court, and holding that

the district court lacked personal jurisdiction over defendant

Anthony Walden. See Walden v. Fiore, 134 S. Ct. 1115

(2014). We therefore remand this case to the district court

with instructions to dismiss the complaint for lack of

jurisdiction.
-----Original Message----- 

From: melizaoleary@sbcglobal.net [mailto:melizaoleary@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 4:56 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

 Michaele OLearyReiff 

849 Bridge Road 

San Leandro, CA 94577
Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David H. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and that I, Thomas L. Redding, Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David H. GillDavid H. Gill, President and CEO(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Thomas L. ReddingThomas L. Redding, Sr. Vice President and CFO(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


Date: April 30, 2009
§ 218.51 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of this subpart is to prevent accidents and casualties that can result from the operation of trains when safety devices intended to improve the safety of their movement have been disabled.
( b ) This subpart does not prohibit intervention with safety devices that is permitted: ( 1 ) Under the provisions of § 236.566 or § 236.567 of this chapter;
( 2 ) Under the provisions of § 218.61 of this part; or
( 3 ) Under the provisions of § 229.9 of this chapter, provided that when a locomotive is being operated under the provision of § 229.9(b) a designated officer has been notified of the defective alerter or deadman pedal at the first available point of communication.
[54 FR 5492, Feb. 3, 1989, as amended at 58 FR 36613, July 8, 1993]
#### § 233.11 Civil penalties.

Any person (an entity of any type covered under 1 U.S.C. 1, including but not limited to the following: a railroad; a manager, supervisor, official, or other employee or agent of a railroad; any owner, manufacturer, lessor, or lessee of railroad equipment, track, or facilities; any independent contractor providing goods or services to a railroad; and any employee of such owner, manufacturer, lessor, lessee, or independent contractor) who violates any requirement of this part or causes the violation of any such requirement is subject to a civil penalty of at least $1,086 and not more than $35,516 per violation, except that: Penalties may be assessed against individuals only for willful violations, and, where a grossly negligent violation or a pattern of repeated violations has created an imminent hazard of death or injury to persons, or has caused death or injury, a penalty not to exceed $142,063 per violation may be assessed. Each day a violation continues shall constitute a separate offense. See FRA's website at *www.fra.dot.gov* for a statement of agency civil penalty policy.

[63 FR 11623, Mar. 10, 1998, as amended at 69 FR 30595, May 28, 2004; 72 FR 51197, Sept. 6, 2007; 73 FR 79703, Dec. 30, 2008; 77 FR 24422, Apr. 24, 2012; 81 FR 43111, July 1, 2016; 82 FR 16134, Apr. 3, 2017; 83 FR 60749, Nov. 27, 2018; 84 FR 23736, May 23, 2019; 84 FR 37074, July 31, 2019; 86 FR 1759, Jan. 11, 2021; 86 FR 23255, May 3, 2021; 87 FR 15869, Mar. 21, 2022; 88 FR 1128, Jan. 6, 2023; 88 FR 89563, Dec. 28, 2023]
J~~s~o srqr

~

s 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

~rqG PROS~

G" 

o 

 Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Mr. J. R. Stroble MAR 2 4 2014 

Manager, National TRU Program 

U.S. Department of Energy OFFICE OF 

P.O. Box 3090 AIR AND RADIATION 

Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

On December 17, 2013 the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) requested 

the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's approval of the five-foot setback configuration (for 

Standard Large Boxes Type 2(SLB2)) of the Nondestructive Assay Box Counter (NABC) for contacthandled (CH) waste as implemented by the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Savannah 

River Site (SRS). This letter approves the requested Tier 1(T1) change, which only affects the gamma 

modality of the NABC. However, the approval has the limitation that the NABC in the five-foot setback 

configuration is not approved to be used to discriminate TRU and non-TRU wastes in accordance with 

the 100 nanocuries per gram (nCi/g) criterion, based on the technical documentation provided by SRSCCP to support this T1 request. The enclosed report details EPA's evaluation of the subject change (see 

EPA's Air pocket # A-98-49; II-A4-182) and the above limitation. 

The tiering table provided in the report accompanying EPA's Tier 1 approval of the five-foot setback 

configuration for Standard Waste Boxes (Docket no. A-98-49; II-A4-171) dated February 2013, EPA 

identiBed the "extension or changes to the approved calibration range for approved equipment" as a T1 

change. The proposed Tl change request fulfills the T1 change requirement per 40 CFR 194.8(b). 

EPA conducted a desktop evaluation of the requested change as we had previously observed the device 

operation on site in July 2012. EPA's evaluation did not identify any issues related to the processes 

implemented to characterize the subject waste. There were no changes to the tiering table for SRS-CCP 

CH waste. 

If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462 or 

Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422. 

Sincerely, 

Tom Peake, Director 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Enclosure 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable * Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100°/, Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: Electronic Distribution 

Joe Franco, CBFO 

Courtland Fesmire, CBFO QA 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO 

Tom Morgan, CBFO 

Bert Crapse, DOE-SRS 

Ron Reeves, NWP-CCP 

Site Documents
-----Original Message----- 

From: artshehoo@gmail.com [mailto:artshehoo@gmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 12:30 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sherman Hoover 

83 Appalachian Way 

Asheville, NC 28806
§ 237.51 Railroad bridge engineers. ( a ) A railroad bridge engineer shall be a person who is determined by the track owner to be competent to perform the following functions as they apply to the particular engineering work to be performed: ( 1 ) Determine the forces and stresses in railroad bridges and bridge components;
( 2 ) Prescribe safe loading conditions for railroad bridges;
( 3 ) Prescribe inspection and maintenance procedures for railroad bridges; and
( 4 ) Design repairs and modifications to railroad bridges.
( b ) The educational qualifications of a railroad bridge engineer shall include either: ( 1 ) A degree in engineering granted by a school of engineering with at least one program accredited by ABET, Inc. or its successor organization as a professional engineering curriculum, or a degree from a program accredited as a professional engineering curriculum by a foreign organization recognized by ABET, Inc. or its successor; or
( 2 ) Current registration as a professional engineer.
( c ) Nothing in this part affects the States' authority to regulate the professional practice of engineering.
§ 240.109 General criteria for eligibility based on prior safety conduct. ( a ) Each railroad's program shall include criteria and procedures to implement this section.
( b ) A railroad shall evaluate the prior safety conduct of any person it is considering for qualification as a locomotive engineer and the program shall require that a person is ineligible if the person has an adverse record of prior safety conduct as provided for in § 240.115, § 240.117, or § 240.119.
( c ) The program shall require evaluation of data which reflect the person's prior safety conduct as a railroad employee and the person's prior safety conduct as an operator of a motor vehicle, provided that there is relevant prior conduct. The information to be evaluated shall include: ( 1 ) The relevant data furnished from the evaluating railroad's own records, if the person was previously an employee of that railroad;
( 2 ) The relevant data furnished by any other railroad formerly employing the person; and
( 3 ) The relevant data furnished by any governmental agency with pertinent motor vehicle driving records.
( d ) The railroad's process for evaluating information concerning prior safety conduct shall be designed to conform wherever necessary with the procedural requirements of §§ 240.111, 240.113, 240.115, 240.117, 240.119, and 240.217.
( e ) When evaluating a person's motor vehicle driving record or a person's railroad employment record, a railroad shall not consider information concerning motor vehicle driving incidents or prior railroad safety conduct that occurred at a time other than that specifically provided for in § 240.115, § 240.117 or § 240.119 of this subpart.
( f ) A railroad's program shall provide a candidate for certification or recertification a reasonable opportunity to review and comment in writing on any record which contains information concerning the person's prior safety conduct, including information pertinent to determinations required under § 240.119 of this subpart, if the railroad believes the record contains information that could be sufficient to render the person ineligible for certification under this subpart.
( g ) The opportunity for comment shall be afforded to the person prior to the railroad's rendering its eligibility decision based on that information. Any responsive comment furnished shall be retained by the railroad in accordance with § 240.215 of this part.
( h ) The program shall include a method for a person to advise the railroad that he or she has never been a railroad employee or obtained a license to drive a motor vehicle. Nothing in this section shall be construed as imposing a duty or requirement that a person have prior railroad employment experience or obtain a motor vehicle driver's license in order to become a certified locomotive engineer.
( i ) Nothing in this section, § 240.111, or § 240.113 shall be construed to prevent persons subject to this part from entering into an agreement that results in a railroad's obtaining the information needed for compliance with this subpart in a different manner than that prescribed in § 240.111 or § 240.113.
[56 FR 28254, June 19, 1991, as amended at 74 FR 68182, Dec. 23, 2009]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2446

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to reduce the influence

of multicandidate political committees in elections for Federal office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 1995

Mr. SMITH of Michigan (for himself, Mrs. SMITH of Washington, and Mr.

WAMP) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on House Oversight

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

reduce the influence of multicandidate political committees in elections for Federal office.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘PAC Limitation Act

5 of 1995’’.
2

•HR 2446 IH

1 SEC. 2. BAN ON MULTICANDIDATE POLITICAL COMMITTEE

2 CONTRIBUTIONS TO CANDIDATES IN ELEC3 TIONS FOR FEDERAL OFFICE.

4 Section 315(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Election Cam5 paign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a(a)(2)(A)) is amended

6 to read as follows:

7 ‘‘(A) to any candidate and his authorized politi8 cal committees with respect to any election for Fed9 eral office;’’.

10 SEC. 3. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTION LIMITA11 TION ON CONTRIBUTIONS FROM SOURCES

12 OUTSIDE THE DISTRICT.

13 Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act

14 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a), is amended by adding at the

15 end the following new subsection:

16 ‘‘(i) A candidate for the office of Representative in,

17 or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress

18 may not, with respect to a reporting period for an election,

19 accept contributions from all sources outside the congres20 sional district involved totaling in excess of the total of

21 contributions accepted from individual residents of the

22 congressional district involved.’’.

Æ
-----Original Message----- 

From: ekunreuther@earthlink.net [mailto:ekunreuther@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:39 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Elizabeth Kunreuther 

2709 Everett Avenue 

Raleigh, NC 27607