alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People ex rel. Rollins v. The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Rio Grande et al.

Case Followed.

Tlie judgment in this case is reversed upon tlie authority of *The People ex rel. v. Rio Grande County, ante,*p. 229.

*jError to the District Court of Rio Crande County.*

*242Mr, E. F. RlCHAEDSON, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Jesse Stephenson and Mr. Geo. P. Wilson, for defendants in error.

Messrs. Doud & Fowlee, *amici curice.*

Pee Cueiam.

These proceedings were instituted by Rollins to collect judgment originally recovered by one Jenney and transferred to him. They took substantially the same steps as in the other case against the county of Rio Grande, and for the reasons given in that the plaintiff is entitled, unless the matter be otherwise defended than by the present demurrer, to a judgment directing the mandatory writ to issue. Referring to the other opinion for the reasons on which we rest our conclusions, we reverse and remand ■the cause.

*Reversed.*
#### § 236.409 [Reserved]
From: Lilian Marcus [mailto:lilianmarcus@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 9:53 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Parity for Neurofeedback

Comments regarding Regulatory Guidance USCG-2007-27022 

page 19157, II B specific areas 1 and 4

I am a Marriage and Family Therapist who provides neurofeedback (EEG biofeedback) 

treatment to individuals with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, mood disorders, 

autism, traumatic brain injury, and many other central nervous system based disorders. 

Neurofeedback is an empirically validated and widely recognized effective non 

medication treatment for ADHD, as well as many other conditions. There are over 50 

studies evaluating the effectiveness of neurofeedback in the treatment of ADHD, 

Substance Use disorders and Autism. A recent review of this literature concluded “EEG 

biofeedback meets the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry criteria 

for” Clinical Guidelines “for treatment of ADHD.” This means that neurofeedback 

meets the same criteria as those applied to medication for treating ADHD, and that 

neurofeedback “should always be considered as an intervention for this disorder by the 

clinician”. 

This service has been denied by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, United Behavioral Health, 

Blue Cross, Cigna, and Amerigroup. 

This is limitation of an effective and validated treatment for a mental health problem. 

The reasons given by the insurance companies for this denial fell into two categories: 1) 

our company does not cover biofeedback for Mental Health problems or 2) there is not 

yet sufficient evidence for the efficacy of EEG biofeedback. As such, they are using 

evidence-based criteria that are far more restrictive for mental health services than the 

criteria which are used for medical/surgical services. There are many routine medical and 

surgical procedures which have far fewer controlled studies about their efficacy than does 

EEG biofeedback. These medical and surgical procedures are generally not limited 

because of concerns about how many controlled studies have been performed about them. 

 We believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity statue 

should require that employers and plans pay for the same range and scope of services for 

Behavioral Treatments as they do for Medical and Surgical benefits and that a plan 

cannot be more restrictive in their managed care criteria and reviews for mental health 

and substance abuse disorders when compared to Medical and Surgical conditions. Today 

plans are being more restrictive in how they review evidence based Mental Health 

and Substance Abuse Treatments when compared to Medical/Surgical treatments. This 

violates both the intent and letter of the parity statute and we hope that the regulations 

will clarify that this cannot continue. 

Sincerely, 

Lilian Marcus, PhD, LMFT, BCIAC 
Lilian Marcus, PhD, LMFT 

800 Chimalus Drive 

Palo Alto, CA 94306 

650-494-2567 

lilianmarcus@sbcglobal.net 

www.brainwavetherapy.com
### DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ Data Sheet (EXHIBIT A )

Page 1 of 1 

### Aircraft

Supported Battery DJI 5200mAh LiPo Battery

Weight (Battery & Propellers included) 1242g

Hover Accuracy (Ready to Fly) Vertical: 0.8m; Horizontal: 2.5m

Max Yaw Angular Velocity 200°/s

Max Tiltable Angle 35°

Max Ascent / Descent Speed Ascent: 6m/s; Descent: 2m/s

Max Flight Speed 15m/s (Not Recommended)

Diagonal motor

- motor distance 350mm



### Gimbal

Working Current Static : 750mA; Dynamic : 900mA

Control Accuracy ±0.03°

Controllable Range Pitch :

- 90°

- 0°

Maximum Angular Speed Pitch : 90°/s



### Camera

Operating Environment Temperature 0 °C

- 40 °C

Sensor size 1/2.3"

Effective Pixels 14 Megapixels

Resolution 4384×3288

HD Recording 1080p30 & 720p

Recording FOV 110° / 85°



### Remote Control

Operating Frequency 5.728 GHz

- 5.85 GHz

Communication Distance (open area) CE Compliance: 400m; FCC Compliance: 800m

Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER)

- 93dBm

Transmitter Power CE Compliance: 25mW; FCC Compliance: 100mW

Working Voltage 120 mA@3.7V

Built

- in LiPo Battery Working Current/Capacity 3.7V, 2000mAh



### Range Extender

Operating Frequency 2412

- 2462MHz

Communication Distance (open area) 500

- 700m

Transmitter Power 20dBm

Power Consumption 2W



### DJI VISION App

S ystem Requirement Of Mobile Device iOS version 6.1 or above

Android system version 4.0 or above

Mobile Device Support iOS recommended: iPhone 4s, iPhone 5, iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, I

Phone 6 Plus, iPod touch 5 (available but not recommended:

iPad 3, iPad 4, iPad mini)

Android recommended: Samsung Galaxy S3, S4, Note 2, Note 3

or phones of similar configuration
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2430

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require that candidates for the House of Representatives receive at least half of their

campaign contributions from individuals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 1995

Mr. FRANKS of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on House Oversight

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

require that candidates for the House of Representatives

receive at least half of their campaign contributions from

individuals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTION LIMI4 TATION ON CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PERSONS

5 OTHER THAN INDIVIDUALS.

6 Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act

7 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a) is amended by adding at the end

8 the following new subsection:
2

•HR 2430 IH

1 ‘‘(i) A candidate for the office of Representative in,

2 or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress

3 may not, with respect to a reporting period for an election,

4 accept contributions from persons other than individuals

5 totaling in excess of 50 percent of all contributions accept6 ed by the candidate with respect to the reporting period.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT
      32.1





**Certification
      Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.**§ **1350)**





The
      undersigned, as the chief executive
      officer of PAB Bankshares, Inc., certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that
      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, which
      accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
      in
      the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of PAB Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and
      for
      the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall
      not be relied upon for any other purpose.





Dated
      this 9th day of August,
      2007.








*/s/**M.****Burke**Welsh,
                Jr.*M. Burke
                Welsh, Jr.President
                and Chief Executive Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      PAB Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by PAB Bankshares, Inc. and furnished
      to the SEC or its staff upon request.
§ 271.111 Implementation and support training. ( a ) A railroad shall provide RRP training to each employee, including an employee of any person identified by the railroad's RRP plan pursuant to § 271.205(a)(3) as performing significant safety-related services on the railroad's behalf or utilizing significant safety-related services provided by the railroad, who has significant responsibility for implementing and supporting the railroad's RRP. This training shall help ensure that all personnel with significant responsibility for implementing and supporting the RRP understand the goals of the program, are familiar with the elements of the railroad's program, and have the requisite knowledge and skills to fulfill their responsibilities under the program.
( b ) A railroad shall keep a record of training conducted under this section and update that record as necessary. A railroad shall make training records available for inspection and copying upon the request of representatives of FRA or States participating under part 212 of this chapter.
( c ) Training under this section may include, but is not limited to, interactive computer-based training, video conferencing, or formal classroom training.
§ 229.27 Annual tests. ( a ) All testing under this section shall be performed at intervals that do not exceed 368 calendar days.
( b ) Load meters that indicate current (amperage) being applied to traction motors shall be tested. Each device used by the engineer to aid in the control or braking of the train or locomotive that provides an indication of air pressure electronically shall be tested by comparison with a test gauge or self-test designed for this purpose. An error greater than five percent or greater than three pounds per square inch shall be corrected. The date and place of the test shall be recorded on Form FRA F 6180-49A, and the person conducting the test and that person's supervisor shall sign the form.
( c ) A microprocessor-based event recorder with a self-monitoring feature equipped to verify that all data elements required by this part are recorded, requires further maintenance and testing only if either of the following conditions exist: ( 1 ) The self-monitoring feature displays an indication of a failure. If a failure is displayed, further maintenance and testing must be performed until a subsequent test is successful. When a successful test is accomplished, a record, in any medium, shall be made of that fact and of any maintenance work necessary to achieve the successful result. This record shall be available at the location where the locomotive is maintained until a record of a subsequent successful test is filed; or,
( 2 ) A download of the event recorder, taken within the preceding 30 days and reviewed for the previous 48 hours of locomotive operation, reveals a failure to record a regularly recurring data element or reveals that any required data element is not representative of the actual operations of the locomotive during this time period. If the review is not successful, further maintenance and testing shall be performed until a subsequent test is successful. When a successful test is accomplished, a record, in any medium, shall be made of that fact and of any maintenance work necessary to achieve the successful result. This record shall be kept at the location where the locomotive is maintained until a record of a subsequent successful test is filed. The download shall be taken from information stored in the certified crashworthy crash hardened event recorder memory module if the locomotive is so equipped.
[77 FR 21345, Apr. 9, 2012]
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*The Brooklyn City Railroad Company, *Appellant, v.*The Board of Assessors of Brooklyn, *Respondent*.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbtirsements. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
CMI Corporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form
S-8 (No. 33-66274) of CMI Corporation of our report dated February 22, 1999,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of CMI Corporation and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of
earnings, changes in common stock and other capital, and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, which report appears
in the December 31, 1998, annual report on Form 10-K of CMI Corporation.



                                             KPMG LLP

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
March 19, 1999



                                       54
§ 271.605 General requirements; procedure. ( a ) Each railroad subject to this part shall: ( 1 ) Establish and implement an FRMP as part of its RRP; and
( 2 ) Establish an FRA-approved FRMP plan as a component of a railroad's FRA-approved RRP plan and then update the FRMP plan as necessary as part of the annual internal assessment of its RRP under § 271.401.
( b ) A railroad's FRMP plan must explain the railroad's method of analysis of fatigue risks and the railroad's process(es) for implementing its FRMP.
( c ) ( 1 ) A railroad shall submit an FRMP plan to FRA for approval no later than either the applicable timeline in § 271.301(b) for filing its RRP plan or July 13, 2023, whichever is later; and
( 2 ) A railroad shall submit updates to its FRMP plan under the process for amending its RRP plan in § 271.303.
( d ) FRA shall review and approve or disapprove a railroad's FRMP plan under the process for reviewing RRP plans in § 271.301(d) and updates to the railroad's FRMP plan under the process for reviewing amendments to an RRP plan in § 271.303(c). FRA approval of a railroad's FRMP plan amends a railroad's RRP plan to include the FRMP plan as a component.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

September 2, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-21-00447-CV

IN RE D&R USA ENTERPRISE, INC., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1171065

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 9, 2021, relator D&R USA Enterprise, Inc. filed a petition for writ 

of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. 

App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Lamar 

McCorkle, visiting judge of County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County, to 

dismiss, for want of jurisdiction, the underlying de novo appeal from a judgment of

possession entered by justice of the peace court. 
2

On August 13, 2021, real party in interest SCF RC Funding IV, LLC filed a 

motion to dismiss relator’s petition because the trial court signed an order dismissing

the underlying de novo appeal on August 10, 2021. Relator’s request for relief is 

now moot. The motion is GRANTED.

Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Hassan and Poissant.
From:

Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 10:45 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Proposed fiduciary retirement plan rule

I applaud the DOL for proposing legislation that is long overdue in the financial services industry. As a

Investment Adviser Representative of Commonwealth Financial Network, I have an ethical and legal 

obligation to put the interests of my clients first and provide recommendations that are in their best 

interests. That is true regardless of whether my advisory services involve qualified or non-qualified 

investment accounts. There are far too many situations where stock brokers and their associated broker 

dealers present themselves as “advisors” when in fact they are not licensed to do so and are 

misrepresenting themselves to the public. It is time for this situation to end and enhance the reputation 

of those in our industry that are truly committed both ethically and morally to put the interest of our 

clients first. Passage of this law can only improve the standing of and respect for those of us in 

independent investment adviser channel of the financial services industry.

Sincerely,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE BALANCE SHEET
AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              28
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      429
<ALLOWANCES>                                        31
<INVENTORY>                                         12
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   535
<PP&E>                                           5,868
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              747
<BONDS>                                            959
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           735
<OTHER-SE>                                          88
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,183
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,048
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  67
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    396
<INCOME-TAX>                                       149
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                247
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       247
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 49760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4238]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on the Readjustment of Veterans; Notice of 
Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Advisory Committee on the Readjustment of Veterans will be held on 
October 4-5, 2007, at The American Legion, Washington Office, 1608 K 
Street, NW., Washington, DC, from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. each day. The 
meeting will be open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to review the post-war readjustment 
needs of veterans and to evaluate the availability and effectiveness of 
VA programs to meet these needs.
    The agenda for October 4 will feature a review of VA and Department 
of Defense (DOD) programs to address the mental health and readjustment 
service needs of returning war veterans, deployment-related stress 
problems faced by service members and their families, and Battlemind 
Training for Families as developed by the Walter Reed Army Institute 
for Research.
    On October 5, the Committee will be provided an update on the 
current activities of the Readjustment Counseling Service Vet Center 
program to serve the veterans from Operation Enduring Freedom and 
Operation Iraqi Freedom. The agenda will also include a review of the 
partnership between VA and DOD in ensuring a seamless transition for 
returning war veterans, strategic planning activities, and drafting 
recommendations for the Committee's next report to Congress.
    Time will not be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral 
presentations from the public. However, members of the public may 
direct written questions or submit prepared statements for review by 
the Committee in advance to Mr. Charles M. Flora, M.S.W., Designated 
Federal Officer, Readjustment Counseling Service, Department of 
Veterans Affairs (15), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. 
Those who plan to attend or have questions concerning the meeting may 
contact Mr. Flora at (202) 461-6531 or e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f2c272e3d232a3c612923203d2e0f392e61282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="73101b12011f16005d151f1c01123305125d141c05">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 24, 2007.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-4238 Filed 8-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 230.101 Steam locomotive driving journal boxes. ( a ) *Driving journal boxes.* Driving journal boxes shall be maintained in a safe and suitable condition for service. Not more than one shim may be used between the box and bearing.
( b ) *Broken bearings.* Broken bearings shall be renewed.
( c ) *Loose bearings.* Loose bearings shall be repaired or renewed.
#### § 1112.1 When modified procedure is used.

The Board may decide that a proceeding be heard under modified procedure when it appears that substantially all material issues of fact can be resolved through submission of written statements, and efficient disposition of the proceeding can be accomplished without oral testimony. Modified procedure may be ordered on the Board's initiative, or upon approval of a request by any party.

[47 FR 49558, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 52712, Oct. 8, 1996]
-----Original Message----- 

From: karenrad@gmail.com [mailto:karenrad@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:35 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Karen Gollrad 

3307 W. Sunnyside Ave. #2 

Chicago, IL 60625