`[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 18, 1995 (69), Para 69.12 Recorded Vote]
[Pages 755-761]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.69.12  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment in the nature of a substitute 
submitted by Mr. GEPHARDT:

       Strike all after the resolving clause and insert the 
     following:
  


     SECTION 1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL 
                   YEAR 1996.

       The Congress determines and declares that this resolution 
     is the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 
     1996, including the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal 
     years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002, as required by 
     section 301 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974.
  


     SEC. 2. RECOMMENDED LEVELS AND AMOUNTS.

       The following budgetary levels are appropriated for the 
     fiscal years beginning on October 1, 1995, October 1, 1996, 
     October 1, 1997, October 1, 1998, October 1, 1999, October 1, 
     2000, and October 1, 2001:
       (1) The recommended levels of Federal revenues are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $1,043,412,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,083,818,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,136,201,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,191,632,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,253,089,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,322,134,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,397,102,000,000.

     and the amounts by which the aggregate levels of Federal 
     revenues should be increased are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $0.
       Fiscal year 1997: $0.
       Fiscal year 1998: $0.
       Fiscal year 1999: $0.
       Fiscal year 2000: $0.
       Fiscal year 2001: $0.
       Fiscal year 2002: $0.

     and the amounts for Federal Insurance Contributions Act 
     revenues for hospital insurance within the recommended levels 
     of Federal revenues are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $103,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $109,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $114,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $120,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $126,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $133,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $140,400,000,000.
       (2) The appropriate levels of total new budget authority 
     are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $1,278,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,308,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,356,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,395,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,452,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,474,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,523,900,000,000.
       (3) The appropriate levels of total budget outlays are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $1,279,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,305,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,334,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,377,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,430,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,459,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,506,100,000,000.
       (4) The amounts of the deficits are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $236,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $222,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $198,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $185,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $177,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $137,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $109,300,000,000.
       (5) The appropriate levels of the public debt are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $5,195,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $5,516,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $5,809,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $6,099,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $6,374,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $6,614,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $6,806,100,000,000.
       (6) The appropriate levels of total Federal credit activity 
     for the fiscal years beginning on October 1, 1995, October 1, 
     1996, October 1, 1997, October 1, 1998, October 1, 1999, 
     October 1, 2000, and October 1, 2001 are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $37,600,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $193,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $40,200,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $187,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $42,300,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $185,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $45,700,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $183,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $45,600,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $184,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $45,800,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $186,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $46,100,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $187,600,000,000.
  


     SEC. 3. MAJOR FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES.

       The Congress determines and declares that the appropriate 
     levels of new budget authority, budget outlays, new direct 
     loan obligations, new primary loan guarantee commitments, and 
     new secondary loan guarantee commitments for fiscal years 
     1996 through 2002 for each major functional category are:
       (1) National Defense (050):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $257,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $261,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $253,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $257,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $259,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $254,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $266,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $259,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $275,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $267,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $275,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $273,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $281,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $276,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (2) International Affairs (150):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $17,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $18,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $18,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $18,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $9,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $18,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $18,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $18,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,000,000,000.

[[Page 756]]

       (B) Outlays, $10,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $18,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (3) General Science, Space, and Technology (250):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (4) Energy (270):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $2,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $2,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $1,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $4,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $3,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $4,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $3,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $4,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $4,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $4,00,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (5) Natural Resources and Environment (300):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $19,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $20,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $18,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $20,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $17,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $18,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $17,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (6) Agriculture (350):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,500,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,500,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $10,900,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,600,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $10,900,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $2,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $-7,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,900,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.

[[Page 757]]

       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $1,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $-5,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $-7,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $-5,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $1,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $-3,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $-3,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $-3,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (8) Transportation (400):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $38,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $40,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $41,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $35,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $42,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $34,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $43,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $35,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $44,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $35,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $44,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $35,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $44,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $35,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (9) Community and Regional Development (450):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $9,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $7,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $7,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $7,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (10) Education, Training, Employment, and Social Services 
     (500):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $53,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $53,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $13,600,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $16,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $53,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $53,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $16,300,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $15,900,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $52,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $51,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $19,100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $15,200,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $53,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $52,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $21,800,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $14,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $53,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $53,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $21,900,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $15,000,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $53,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $52,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $22,000,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $15,800,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $54,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $53,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $22,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $16,600,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (11) Health (550):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $124,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $124,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $130,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $130,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

[[Page 758]]

       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $138,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $139,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $146,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $146,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $153,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $153,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $159,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $159,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $166,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $166,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (12) Medicare (570):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $171,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $169,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $182,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $181,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $198,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $196,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $215,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $212,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $235,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $234,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $254,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $252,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $277,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $275,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (13) Income Security (600):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $227,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $226,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $239,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $240,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $259,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $252,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $263,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $265,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $281,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $281,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $286,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $286,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $300,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $300,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (14) Social Security (650):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $5,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $9,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $5,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $7,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $5,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (15) Veterans Benefits and Services (700):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $37,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $36,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $26,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $38,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $38,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $21,600,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $38,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $38,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,000,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $19,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $39,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $39,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,000,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $19,600,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $39,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $40,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $19,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $39,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $41,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $19,800,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $40,100,000,000.

[[Page 759]]

       (B) Outlays, $41,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $20,600,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (16) Administration of Justice (750):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $18,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $18,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $19,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $19,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $20,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $19,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $20,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $18,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $19,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $18,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $19,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (17) General Government (800):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (18) Net Interest (900):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $296,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $296,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $302,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $302,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $304,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $304,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $307,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $307,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $310,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $310,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $309,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $309,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $311,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $311,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (19) Allowances (920):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $-8,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $-6,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $-8,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $-8,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $-7,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $-7,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, -$6,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$7,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, -$5,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$6,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$5,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$6,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$5,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$6,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (20) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, -$33,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$32,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, -$33,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$33,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, -$36,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$35,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $-37,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $-38,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

[[Page 760]]

       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $-39,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $-41,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $-41,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $-41,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $-42,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $-42,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
  


     SEC. 4. RECONCILIATION.

       (a) Not later than September 14, 1995, the House committees 
     named in subsections (b) through (o) of this section shall 
     submit their recommendations to the House Budget Committee. 
     After receiving those recommendations, the House Budget 
     Committee shall report to the House a reconciliation bill or 
     resolution or both carrying out all such recommendations 
     without any substantive revision.
       (b) The House Committee on Agriculture shall report changes 
     in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending 
     sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as follows: 
     $1,120,000,000 in budget authority and $1,120,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1996, $2,530,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $2,530,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997, 
     $2,650,000,000 in budget authority and $2,650,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1998, $2,810,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $2,810,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999, 
     $2,650,000,000 in budget authority and $2,650,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 2000, $2,700,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $2,700,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, 
     and $2,760,000,000 in budget authority and $2,760,000,000 in 
     fiscal year 2002.
       (c) The House Committee on Banking and Financial Services 
     shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that 
     provide direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority 
     and outlays as follows: $910,000,000 in budget authority and 
     $910,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996, $930,000,000 in 
     budget authority and $930,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 
     1997, $950,000,000 in budget authority and $950,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1998, $1,030,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $1,030,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999, 
     $1,050,000,000 in budget authority and $1,050,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 2000, $1,070,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $1,070,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, 
     and $1,070,000,000 in budget authority and $1,070,000,000 in 
     fiscal year 2002.
       (d) The House Committee on Commerce shall report changes in 
     laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending 
     sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as follows: 
     $15,780,000,000 in budget authority and $15,650,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1996, $30,830,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $30,830,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997, 
     $36,070,000,000 in budget authority and $36,080,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1998, $49,820,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $50,010,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999, 
     $59,140,000,000 in budget authority and $59,140,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 2000, $68,760,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $68,760,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, 
     and $82,480,000,000 in budget authority and $82,480,000,000 
     in fiscal year 2002.
       (e) The House Committee on Economic and Educational 
     Opportunities shall report changes in laws within its 
     jurisdiction that provide direct spending sufficient to 
     reduce budget authority and outlays as follows: $460,000,000 
     in budget authority and $390,000,000 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1996, $770,000,000 in budget authority and $730,000,000 
     in outlays in fiscal year 1997, $800,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $790,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1998, 
     $830,000,000 in budget authority and $830,000,000 in outlays 
     in fiscal year 1999, $880,000,000 in budget authority and 
     $880,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000, $1,210,000,000 
     in budget authority and $1,200,000,000 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 2001, and $1,290,000,000 in budget authority and 
     $1,280,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.
       (f) The House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight 
     shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that 
     provide direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority 
     and outlays as follows: $280,000,000 in budget authority and 
     $280,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996, $570,000,000 in 
     budget authority and $570,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 
     1997, $890,000,000 in budget authority and $890,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1998, $1,220,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $1,220,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999, 
     $1,810,000,000 in budget authority and $1,810,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 2000, $840,000,000 in budget authority 
     and $840,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, and 
     $1,160,000,000 in budget authority and $1,160,000,000 in 
     fiscal year 2002.
       (g) The House Committee on International Relations shall 
     report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide 
     direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and 
     outlays as follows: $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays 
     in fiscal year 1996, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays 
     in fiscal year 1997, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays 
     in fiscal year 1998, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays 
     in fiscal year 1999, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays 
     in fiscal year 2000, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays 
     in fiscal year 2001, and $0 in budget authority and $0 in 
     fiscal year 2002.
       (h) The House Committee on the Judiciary shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as 
     follows: $120,000,000 in budget authority and $120,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1996, $130,000,000 in budget authority 
     and $130,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997, $140,000,000 
     in budget authority and $140,000,000 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1998, $270,000,000 in budget authority and $150,000,000 
     in outlays in fiscal year 1999, $270,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $160,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000, 
     $280,000,000 in budget authority and $160,000,000 in outlays 
     in fiscal year 2001, and $290,000,000 in budget authority and 
     $170,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.
       (i) The House Committee on National Security shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as 
     follows: $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1996, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1997, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1998, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1999, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 2000,
       (j) The House Committee on Resources shall report changes 
     in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending 
     sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as follows: 
     $60,000,000 in budget authority and $60,000,000 in outlays in 
     fiscal year 1996, $80,000,000 in budget authority and 
     $80,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997, $2,330,000,000 in 
     budget authority and $2,330,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 
     1998, $1,090,000,000 in budget authority and $1,090,000,000 
     in outlays in fiscal year 1999, $290,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $290,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000, 
     $3,970,000,000 in budget authority and $3,970,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 2001, and $3,380,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $3,380,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.
       (k) The House Committee on Science shall report changes in 
     laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending 
     sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as follows: 
     $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1996, 
     $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1997, 
     $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1998, 
     $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1999, 
     $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 2000, 
     $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, 
     and $0 in budget authority and $0 in fiscal year 2002.
       (l) The House Committee on Small Business shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as 
     follows: $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1996, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1997, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1998, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1999, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 2000, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 2001, and $0 in budget authority and $0 in fiscal year 
     2002.
       (m) The House Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure shall report changes in laws within its 
     jurisdiction that provide direct spending sufficient to 
     reduce budget authority and outlays as follows: $550,000,000 
     in budget authority and $550,000,000 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1996, $550,000,000 in budget authority and $550,000,000 
     in outlays in fiscal year 1997, $550,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $550,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1998, 
     $610,000,000 in budget authority and $610,000,000 in outlays 
     in fiscal year 1999, $620,000,000 in budget authority and 
     $620,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000, $620,000,000 in 
     budget authority and $620,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 
     2001, and $620,000,000 in budget authority and $620,000,000 
     in fiscal year 2002.
       (n) The House Committee on Veterans' Affairs shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as 
     follows: $300,000,000 in budget authority and $300,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1996, $300,000,000 in budget authority 
     and $300,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997, $400,000,000 
     in budget authority and $400,000,000 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1998, $500,000,000 in budget authority and $500,000,000 
     in outlays in fiscal year 1999, $1,200,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $1,200,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000, 
     $1,300,000,000 in budget authority and $1,300,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 2001, and $1,500,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $1,500,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.
       (o) The House Committee on Ways and Means shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction sufficient to reduce 
     the deficit, as follows: $14,370,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, 
     $27,550,000,000 in fiscal year 1997, $28,460,000,000 in 
     fiscal year 1998, $35,960,000,000 in fiscal year 1999, 
     $35,340,000,000 in fiscal year 2000, $42,320,000,000 in 
     fiscal year 2001, and $50,220,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.
       (p) For purposes of this section, the term ``direct 
     spending'' has the meaning given to such term in section 
     250(c)(8) of the Balanced

[[Page 761]]

     Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 and the term 
     ``new budget authority'' has the meaning given to such term 
     in section 3(2) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment 
     Control Act of 1974.
  


     SEC. 5. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING TAX CUTS.

       It is the sense of the Congress that changes in tax laws 
     which stimulate private investment of savings should be 
     enacted if the deficit reduction targets in this resolution 
     are met.
  


     SEC. 6. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING EMERGENCIES.

       It is the sense of the Congress that Congress should study 
     alternative approaches to budgeting for emergencies, 
     establishing regular procedures and funds for paying for 
     emergencies.
  


     SEC. 7. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING DEBT REDUCTION.

       It is the sense of the Congress that eliminating the 
     deficit by producing a balanced budget is only the first step 
     toward the ultimate goal of reducing and eventually 
     eliminating the public debt.
  


     SEC. 8. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING TRUST FUND SURPLUSES.

       Congress finds that all recent year Federal budgets, as 
     well as both fiscal year 1996 budget resolutions reported out 
     by the Budget Committees of the House of Representatives and 
     the Senate, have masked the magnitude of annual deficits by 
     counting various trust fund surpluses. Therefore, it is the 
     sense of the Congress that upon reaching a balance in the 
     Federal budget, the Government should move toward balance 
     without consideration of trust fund surpluses.
  


     SEC. 9. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING LOCK-BOX.

       (a) It is the sense of the Congress that:
       (1) The current practice of reallocating for other spending 
     purposes spending cuts made during floor consideration of 
     appropriations bills should be ended.
       (2) A ``Deficit Reduction Lock-Box'' should be established 
     to collect these spending reductions.
       (3) These spending reductions should be used for deficit or 
     debt reduction.
       (b) To facilitate Deficit Reduction Lock-Box compliance by 
     the Committees on Appropriations, the Congressional Budget 
     Office shall score all general appropriation measures and 
     have such score card published in the Congressional Record.
  


     SEC. 10. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING FIREWALLS.

       It is the sense of the Congress that the discretionary 
     spending totals for defense, international, and domestic 
     spending should be enforced through spending limits for each 
     category with firewalls to prevent funds from being shifted 
     between categories.
  


     SEC. 11. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING BUDGET ENFORCEMENT.

       It is the sense of the Congress that, in order to ensure 
     that a balanced budget is achieved by 2002 and remain in 
     balance thereafter, strict enforcement should be enacted. 
     Such language should--
       (1) require the Federal Government to reach a balanced 
     Federal budget by fiscal year 2002 and remain in balance 
     thereafter;
       (2) establish procedures for developing honest, accurate, 
     and accepted budget estimates;
       (3) require that the President propose annual budgets that 
     would achieve a balanced Federal budget by fiscal year 2002 
     and for each year thereafter, use accurate assumptions;
       (4) require the Committees on the Budget of the House of 
     Representatives and Senate to report budget resolutions that 
     achieve a balanced Federal budget by fiscal year 2002 and for 
     each year thereafter, using accurate assumptions; [and]
       (5) establish a comprehensive system of budgetary 
     enforcement to ensure that the levels of discretionary 
     spending, mandatory spending, and revenues in this resolution 
     are met.
  


     SEC. 12. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE COMPLIANCE INITIATIVE.

       (a) Adjustments.--(1) For purposes of points of order under 
     the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and concurrent 
     resolutions on the budget--
       (A) the discretionary spending limits under section 
     601(a)(2) of that Act (and those limits as cumulatively 
     adjusted) for the current fiscal year and each outyear;
       (B) the allocations to the Committee on Appropriations 
     under sections 302(a) and 602(a) of that Act; and
       (C) the appropriate budgetary aggregates in the most 
     recently agreed to concurrent resolution on the budget,

     shall be adjusted to reflect the amounts of additional new 
     budget authority or additional outlays (as defined in 
     paragraph (2)) reported by the Committee on Appropriations in 
     appropriation Acts (or by the committee of conference on such 
     legislation) for the Internal Revenue Service compliance 
     initiative activities in any fiscal year, but not to exceed 
     in any fiscal year $405,000,000 in new budget authority and 
     $405,000,000 in outlays.
       (2) As used in this section, the terms ``additional new 
     budget authority'' or ``additional outlays'' shall mean, for 
     any fiscal year, budget authority or outlays (as the case may 
     be) in excess of the amounts requested for that fiscal year 
     for the Internal Revenue Service in the President's Budget 
     for fiscal year 1996.
       (b) Revised Limits, Allocations, and Aggregates.--Upon the 
     reporting of legislation pursuant to subsection (a), and 
     again upon the submission of a conference report on such 
     legislation (if a conference report is submitted), the 
     chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate or the 
     House of Representatives (as the case may be) shall submit to 
     that chairman's respective House appropriately revised--
       (1) discretionary spending limits under section 601(a)(2) 
     of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (and those limits as 
     cumulatively adjusted) for the current fiscal year and each 
     outyear;
       (2) allocations to the Committee on Appropriations under 
     sections 302(a) and 602(a) of that Act; and
       (3) appropriate budgetary aggregates in the most recently 
     agreed to concurrent resolution on the budget,

     to carry out this subsection. These revised discretionary 
     spending limits, allocations, and aggregates shall be 
     considered for purposes of congressional enforcement under 
     that Act as the discretionary spending limits, allocations, 
     and aggregates.
       (c) Reporting Revised Suballocations.--The Committees on 
     Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives 
     may report appropriately revised suballocations pursuant to 
     sections 302(b)(1) and 602(b)(1) of the Congressional Budget 
     Act of 1974 to carry out this section.
       (d) Contingencies.--
       (1) The Internal Revenue Service and the Department of the 
     Treasury have certified
       (2) This section shall not apply to any additional new 
     budget authority or additional outlays unless--
       (A) the chairmen of the Budget Committees certify, based 
     upon information from the Congressional Budget Office, the 
     General Accounting Office, and the Internal Revenue Service 
     (as well as from any other sources they deem relevant), that 
     such budget authority or outlays will not increase the total 
     of the Federal budget deficits over the next five years; and
       (B) any funds made available pursuant to such budget 
     authority or outlays are available only for the purpose of 
     carrying out Internal Revenue Service compliance initiative 
     activities.
  


     SEC. 13. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING MEDICAID BLOCK GRANTS.

       It is the Sense of Congress that Medicaid block grants 
     should be distributed based on a formula that takes into 
     account the proportion of individuals with income below the 
     poverty level in each State.

Yeas

100

It was decided in the

Nays

325

<3-line {>

negative

Answered present

1`