# Patent

## Title
System and method for purifying heptane

## Abstract

Removing impurities from a heptane stream by contacting the heptane stream with an acidic catalyst, wherein the contacting reduces a concentration of one or more close boiling impurities, one or more olefins, or both. The impurities are isomerized via contact with the acidic catalyst into species that possess lower octane levels or that do not possess boiling points as near to the boiling point of n-heptane, which promotes separation of the impurities via distillation. Close boiling impurities may include such compounds as cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane and methylcyclohexane or may be compounds having boiling points at a standard pressure of 760 Torr in the range of about 96.5 to about 100.5 degrees Celsius including such compounds as cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane and methylcyclohexane. The concentration of cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane and methylcyclohexane may be reduced by at least about 25 and 10 percent by weight, respectively. The concentration of olefins, as measured by the Bromine Index, may be reduced by at least about 25 percent by weight.

## Background
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 60/498,773 entitled “System and Method for Purifying Heptane” and filed on Aug. 29, 2003, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to a system for purifying heptane via a catalytic reaction, and, more particularly, to contacting a heptane stream with an acidic catalyst in order to reduce the concentration of close boiling impurities and produce primary reference fuel grade heptane.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Primary reference fuel (PRF) grade heptane contains a minimum of 99.75 weight percent normal heptane (or “n-heptane”) and is generally produced by purifying a heptane stream that contains less than 99.75 weight percent n-heptane. Among the heptane streams available as a feed for production of PRF heptane may be a pure grade heptane, which contains a minimum of 99.0 weight percent n-heptane. Impurities common to heptane streams include the close boiling C7 isomers methylcyclohexane and cis-1,2 dimethylcyclopentane among other C7 olefin, C7 paraffin, and cyclic impurities. Heptane streams, including pure grade heptane and PRF heptane, are valuable commercially as fuels. Additionally, PRF heptane may be valuable as a high purity solvent, such as in pharmaceutical applications. In order to obtain the purity levels associated with PRF heptane, fractionation has been used to separate the normal heptane (n-heptane) from impurities such as other C7 isomers.
Typically, one or more fractionations of a heptane feedstock stream are employed to produce PRF heptane. The high purity of PRF heptane may cause it to require more than one fractionating step. In addition, super-atmospheric fractionation may improve the ability to separate impurities. As a result, the rate of production of PRF heptane may only be a portion of the production rate of heptane grades containing higher levels of contaminants, such as, for example, pure grade heptane. Thus, fractionation of a heptane stream in order to obtain PRF heptane may be both capital intensive and expensive to operate.
The octane number of a fuel is an expression of antiknock properties commonly measured according to ASTM D 2699, ASTM D 2700, or an average of the two. The octane of pure n-heptane is zero, but olefinic and cyclic impurities in a heptane product have significantly higher octane numbers, which raise the octane number of the heptane product such as PRF heptane. Thus, the higher the percentage of impurities removed from a heptane stream, even after attaining the 99.75 weight percent specification for PRF heptane, the closer the octane number is to zero, and the more competitive the product. Thus, a need exists for improved methods of purifying heptane.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In an embodiment, a method is provided for removing impurities from a heptane stream comprising contacting the heptane stream with an acidic catalyst, wherein said contacting reduces a concentration of one or more close boiling impurities, one or more olefins, or both in the heptane stream. The impurities are isomerized via contact with the acidic catalyst into species that possess lower octane levels or that do not possess boiling points as near to the boiling point of n-heptane, which promotes separation of the impurities via distillation. In an embodiment, impurities are isomerized and removed via distillation to produce a heptane stream comprising at least about 99.75 weight percent heptane (e.g., PRF heptane). In an embodiment, close boiling impurities may include such compounds as cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane and methylcyclohexane. In an embodiment, close boiling impurities may be those having boiling points at a standard pressure of 760 Torr in the range of about 96.5 to about 100.5 degrees Celsius. In an embodiment, the concentration of cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane may be reduced by at least about 25 percent by weight. In another embodiment, the concentration of methylcyclohexane may be reduced by at least about 10 percent by weight. In another embodiment, the concentration of olefins, as measured by the Bromine Index, may be reduced by at least about 25 percent by weight.
In an embodiment, a system for producing a primary reference fuel (PRF) grade heptane is provided. In an embodiment, the system includes a heptane feed, a reactor for contacting the heptane feed with an acidic catalyst, and a fractionation for further separating impurities from said heptane feed after contacting to produce said PRF heptane (minimum 99.75 weight percent purity). In an embodiment, the system includes a dryer for controlling the level of moisture in the heptane feed.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a feed, reactor, and product stream in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a feed, reactor, reactor product, fractionator, and product stream in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of the primary reference fuel grade heptane production system of the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a pair of plots showing the normalized rate constant for removal of cis-1,2 dimethylcyclopentane over time for an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 5 is a chart illustrating the change in the difference between the boiling point of n-heptane and the boiling points of various impurities as pressure varies.



DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
FIG. 1 represents an embodiment of the present invention that reduces the concentration of certain impurities in a heptane stream. In the embodiment illustrated by FIG. 1, a heptane feed stream 100 enters a contacting vessel 110 (e.g., reactor) containing an acidic catalyst. A catalytic isomeric reaction occurs when the heptane stream 100 enters the contacting vessel 110 and is contacted with the acidic catalyst. The reaction between impurities in the heptane stream and the acidic catalyst causes an isomeric conversion of impurities. Thus, the vessel output 120 contains lower concentrations of certain impurities that have undergone isomerization.
The heptane stream provided may be any heptane source or stream containing n-heptane. In an embodiment, the heptane stream contains at least about 90 weight percent n-heptane. In another embodiment, the heptane stream contains at least about 94 weight percent n-heptane. In another embodiment, the heptane stream is a pure grade heptane, which contains a minimum 99.0 weight percent n-heptane. In an embodiment, the heptane stream provided is obtained by fractionation of a C7 fraction of a refinery stream or unit such as a fractionation unit. In addition to n-heptane, such a heptane stream typically contains impurities, including other C7 isomers. In an embodiment, the heptane feed stream typically includes n-heptane and one or more of the additional components listed below in Table I, along with boiling point data:







TABLE I







Example Components of a Heptane Stream











Boiling Point




@ 760 Torr



Compound
(° C.)














1,1-dimethylcyclopentane
87.83



2,3-dimethylpentane
89.78



2-methylhexane
90.06



cis-1,3-dimethylcyclopentane
90.78



3-methylhexane
91.83



trans-1,3-dimethylcyclopentane
91.72



3-ethylpentane
93.50



n-heptane
98.44



isooctane
99.06



cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane
99.56



methylcyclohexane
100.94










In an embodiment, the heptane stream includes at least about 94 weight percent n-heptane. In another embodiment, the heptane stream is a pure grade heptane that typically includes n-heptane and at least one or more of the additional components listed below in Table II, along with boiling point and physical property data:







TABLE II







Components of a Pure Grade Heptane












Boiling point
Standard Heat



Chemical
@760 Torr
of Formation











Compound
Formula
° C.
° F.
(BTU/lb mole)














cis-1,3-dimethylcy-
C7H14
90.77
195.386
−7.14 × 104


clopentane


trans-1,3-dimethylcy-
C7H14
91.73
197.114
−7.23 × 104


clopentane


trans-1,2-dimethylcy-
C7H14
91.87
197.366
−7.37 × 104


clopentane


2-ethyl-1-pentene
C7H14
94.0
210.20
−4.72 × 104


trans-3-heptene
C7H14
95.67
204.206
−4.70 × 104


cis-3-heptene
C7H14
95.75
204.35
−4.49 × 104


trans-2-heptene
C7H14
97.95
208.31
−4.71 × 104


cis-2-heptene
C7H14
98.41
209.138
−4.52 × 104


n-heptane
C7H16
98.43
209.174
−9.64 × 104


2,2,4-trimethyl pentane
C7H16
99.238
210.628
−1.11 × 105


(isooctane)


cis-1,2-dimethylcyclo-
C7H14
99.53
211.154
−7.11 × 104


pentane


methylcyclohexane
C7H14
100.934
213.631
−8.18 × 104


2,4,4-trimethyl-1-
C7H14
101.44
214.592
−6.29 × 104


pentene









In an embodiment, pure grade heptane includes from about 99.0 to about 99.75 weight percent heptane. In another embodiment, pure grade heptane includes from about 99.3 to about 99.45 weight percent heptane; from about 0.030 to about 0.040 weight percent trans-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane (trans-1,2-DMCP); from about 0.25 to about 0.50 weight percent cis-1,2 dimethylcyclopentane (cis-1,2-DMCP); from about 0.050 to about 0.07 weight percent methylcyclohexane; and from about 0.015 to about 0.10 miscellaneous components.
In an embodiment, the isomeric conversion described herein should reduce the concentration of one or more close boiling impurities in the output 120, as compared to the concentration of close boiling impurities in the feed 100. For purposes of this application, close boiling impurities are impurities that possess boiling points close to that of n-heptane. In another embodiment, close boiling impurities are those that possess boiling points in the range from about 96.5 to about 100.5 degrees Celsius at a pressure of about 760 Torr, where n-heptane possesses a boiling point under similar conditions of about 98.4 degrees Celsius. In another embodiment, close boiling impurities are those that possess boiling points in the range from about 97.0 to about 100.3 degrees Celsius at a pressure of about 760 Torr. In another embodiment, close boiling impurities are those that possess boiling points in the range from about 97.5 to about 100.0 degrees Celsius at a pressure of about 760 Torr. In particular, cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane (cis-1,2-DMCP) may be one close boiling impurity found in a heptane stream. The concentration of cis-1,2-DMCP in the heptane stream provided is typically less than one weight percent. In an embodiment, the heptane stream contains at least 90 weight percent heptane and less than 1 weight percent cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane. In another embodiment, the heptane stream contains at least 90 weight percent heptane, less than 1 weight percent cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane, and less than 1 weight percent methylcyclohexane. A portion of the close boiling impurities are isomerized in the contacting vessel into compounds that, for purposes of this application, are considered impurities other than close boiling impurities (or “non-close boiling impurities”). As a result, impurities in the output 120 may be more readily separable, as compared to impurities in the feed 100, from n-heptane via fractionation.
In an embodiment, the isomerization reaction described herein reduces the concentration of the close boiling impurity cis-1,2-DMCP by at least about 25 weight percent. In another embodiment, the isomerization reaction described herein reduces the concentration of the close boiling impurity cis-1,2-DMCP by at least about 50 weight percent. In another embodiment, the isomerization reaction described herein reduces the concentration of the close boiling impurity cis-1,2-DMCP by at least about 70 weight percent. In another embodiment, the isomerization reaction described herein reduces the concentration of the close boiling impurity cis-1,2-DMCP by at least about 85 weight percent. The cis-1,2-DMCP is converted to trans-1,2-dimethylcyclohexane or methylcyclohexane (MCH), or to other species. The most thermodynamically favored isomerization of cis-1,2-DMCP is to MCH. In addition, any C7 olefins in the reactor feed 100 (e.g., see Tables I and II) are thermodynamically favored to isomerize to MCH. Conversion of any C7 olefins to MCH is desirable since reduction of C7 olefins reduces the octane number of the mixture. Conversion to MCH is also significant because the boiling point of MCH (100.934 degrees Celsius at 760 Torr) is about 3 degrees Celsius higher than the boiling point of n-heptane. In contrast, cis-1,2-DMCP possesses a boiling point only about 1 degree Celsius higher than n-heptane. Thus, removing MCH is typically less costly than removing cis-1,2-DMCP in any fractionation step(s) subsequent to the isomerization. Alternatively, the cis-1,2-DMCP not converted to MCH may be converted to other isomeric species, such as those having boiling points more than about 10 degrees Celsius different from n-heptane.
In an embodiment, methylcyclohexane may be a close boiling impurity found in a heptane stream. In an embodiment, the isomerization reaction described herein reduces the concentration of the close boiling impurity methylcyclohexane by at least about 10 weight percent. In another embodiment, the isomerization reaction described herein reduces the concentration of the close boiling impurity methylcyclohexane by at least about 25 weight percent. In another embodiment, the isomerization reaction described herein reduces the concentration of the close boiling impurity methylcyclohexane by at least about 50 weight percent.
The isomerization described herein may also reduce the concentration of olefins as measured by the Bromine Index. The Bromine Index is defined as milligrams of bromine necessary to titrate 100 grams of sample. In an embodiment, the isomerization herein reduces the concentration of olefins according to the Bromine Index by at least about 25 percent by weight. In another embodiment, the isomerization herein reduces the concentration of olefins according to the Bromine Index by at least about 40 percent by weight. In another embodiment, the isomerization herein reduces the concentration of olefins according to the Bromine Index by at least about 50 percent by weight.
The reactor or contacting vessel 110 may be any reactor suitable for contacting n-heptane with an isomerization catalyst in order to execute the catalytic reaction described herein, such as, for example, a continuous flow or batch reactor, whether used in a laboratory or commercial production scale environment. In an embodiment, the vessel 110 is a continuous fixed bed reactor. In another embodiment, the vessel 110 is a continuous upflow packed bed catalytic reactor where both the feed 100 and output products 120 are liquids. In another embodiment, the vessel 110 is a recirculation isomerization reactor where all or part of the reactor effluent is recycled to the feed until a set conversion of impurities is achieved. In another embodiment, the vessel 110 is a batch isomerization reactor. In another embodiment, the vessel 110 is a single pass fixed bed reactor. The vessel 110 contains an acidic catalyst and the heptane feed 100 is contacted with the acidic catalyst within the vessel. The contacting of a heptane stream with an acidic catalyst reduces the concentration of, among other things, cis-1,2-DMCP. In the output 120, the concentration of certain impurities, particularly C7 cyclics and olefins, and/or more particularly close boiling impurities, is reduced, as discussed above, compared to the concentration of such impurities in the heptane feed 100. The output 120 transfers the contacted heptane from the vessel 110, and typically to a further separation step or steps.
Any catalyst, such as an acid catalyst, suitable for converting one or more of the close boiling impurities to non-close boiling impurities may be used. The acidic catalyst may be in aqueous, liquid, or solid form. Examples of such acidic catalysts commonly known in the art and available commercially include chlorosulfonic acid, sulfuric acid, aluminum chloride, Amberlyst®-15, Filtrol®-24 clay, Nafion®, generally any “X” or “Y” zeolite catalyst with substantial acidity, and in particular LZY-84 solid acidic zeolite catalyst. Amberlyst®-15 is a styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer having pendant sulfonic acid groups, and is produced by Rohm and Haas®. Filtrol®-24 clay is a sulfuric acid washed clay catalyst supplied by the Engelhard Corporation. Nafion® is a copolymer of perfluoroethylene (also known as tetrafluoroethylene) and a perfluorovinyl ether containing attached sulfonyl acid groups, and is produced by E. I. DuPont De Nemours and Company of Wilmington, Del. LZY-84 is a solid acidic zeolite catalyst, such as is available from Customtec of Des Plaines, Ill.
In a desirable embodiment of the system and method described herein, the catalyst is an LZY-84 solid acidic zeolite catalyst. Such an LZY-84 solid acidic zeolite catalyst is a “Y” zeolite, and may be an extrudate produced from an LZY-84 synthetic hydrogen form faujasite molecular sieve and an inorganic alumina binder. In an embodiment, each extruded piece is comprised of from about 45 to about 95 weight percent zeolite and from about 5 to about 55 weight percent inorganic alumina binder. In another embodiment, each extruded piece is comprised of from about 65 to about 90 weight percent zeolite and from about 10 to about 35 weight percent inorganic alumina binder. In another embodiment, each extruded piece is comprised of from about 75 to about 85 weight percent zeolite and from about 15 to about 25 weight percent inorganic alumina binder. In an embodiment, the extrudate has a unit cell size of about 20 to about 30 angstroms, a surface area of about 600 to about 700 square meters per gram, and bulk density of about 35 to about 40 pounds per cubit foot. Typical physical properties of these extrudates include a unit cell size of about 24.50 angstroms, surface area of about 650 square meters per gram, and bulk density of about 39 pounds per cubic foot.
In an embodiment, the isomerization reaction described herein may take place among any number of fractionation steps, as long as at least one fractionation step follows the isomerization reactor. FIG. 2 illustrates an embodiment of the present invention in which one or more fractionators 130 are added to the embodiment illustrated by FIG. 1. In the embodiment illustrated by FIG. 2, the reactor product 120 is fed to the one or more fractionators 130, which is designed to further purify the heptane. In an embodiment, the fractionation provided includes one fractionator. In another embodiment, the fractionation provided includes two fractionators. The presence of even small amounts of close boiling impurities, such as cis-1,2-DMCP, in a heptane stream interferes with the ability to produce further purified products, such as PRF heptane. In the reactor 110, a fraction of the close boiling impurities present in the original feed 100 is isomerized into non-close boiling impurities, such as described previously. Thus, the conversion in the contacting vessel 110 of impurities possessing boiling points within 1 degree Celsius of n-heptane to species, such as MCH, which possess boiling points at least 3 degrees Celsius different from n-heptane, may make it possible to employ a less costly fractionation in order to separate a higher percentage of the impurities. In an embodiment, the fractionation provided separates impurities having boiling points at a standard pressure of 760 Torr that are outside the range of about 98.0 degrees to about 99.5 degrees Celsius.
The fractionation may be operated at non-standard pressures in order to manipulate the boiling points of stream constituents. In an embodiment, the fractionation provided occurs at sub-atmospheric pressures. In another embodiment, the fractionation provided occurs at super-atmospheric pressures such that the boiling points of stream components are separated by more degrees than at sub-atmospheric and atmospheric pressures. FIG. 5 charts data illustrating the affect of varying pressure on the difference between the boiling point of n-heptane and the boiling points of several close boiling impurities. A chart value of zero indicates no difference between the boiling point of n-heptane and the boiling point of the impurity. Impurities represented in the chart include cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane (cis-1,2-DMCP), 2,2,4-trimethylpentane (isooctane), trans-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane (trans-1,2-DMCP), 3-methylhexane, 3-ethylpentane, and methylcyclohexane (MCH). The data indicate that boiling point differences between some impurities and n-heptane increase as pressure increases. In an embodiment, the fractionation occurs at from about −20 to about 500 psig. In another embodiment, the fractionation occurs at from about 0 to about 250 psig. In another embodiment, the fractionation occurs at from about 5 to about 100 psig. Example boiling point data in Table III illustrates the effect of a super-atmospheric pressure of 80 psig on boiling point:







TABLE III







Boiling Point Data at 80 psig












Normal
80 psig



Compound
Boiling Point
boiling Point







n-heptane
98.43° C.
177° C.



cis-1,2-DMCP
99.53° C.
181° C.



methylcyclohexane
100.93° C. 
184° C.










The further purified heptane products from such a fractionation may include at least one primary reference fuel (PRF) grade heptane product stream 140. In an embodiment, the PRF heptane stream 140 contains at least about 99.75 weight percent n-heptane. In another embodiment, the PRF heptane stream 140 contains at least about 99.80 weight percent n-heptane. In another embodiment, the PRF heptane stream 140 contains at least about 99.85 weight percent n-heptane. In another embodiment, the PRF heptane stream 140 contains at least about 99.9 weight percent n-heptane. In another embodiment, the PRF heptane stream contains no more than about 0.1 weight percent cis-1,2-DMCP. In another embodiment, the PRF heptane stream contains no more than about 0.05 weight percent cis-1,2-DMCP. In another embodiment, the PRF heptane stream contains no more than about 0.01 weight percent cis-1,2-DMCP. In another embodiment, the PRF heptane stream contains no more than about 0.005 weight percent cis-1,2-DMCP. In another embodiment, the PRF heptane stream contains no more than about 0.001 weight percent cis-1,2-DMCP. The purity of the PRF heptane stream may also be expressed in terms of Bromine Index. In an embodiment, the PRF heptane stream has a Bromine Index of no more than about 3. In an embodiment, the PRF heptane stream has a Bromine Index of no more than about 2. In an embodiment, the PRF heptane stream has a Bromine Index of no more than about 1. In an embodiment, the PRF heptane stream has a Bromine Index of no more than about 0.5.

FIG. 4 is a pair of plots of normalized rate constant K for cis-1,2-DMCP removal versus time. The rate constant is normalized to 212 degrees Fahrenheit (100 degrees Celsius), and is defined by the following equation (using an activation energy of 20,000 BTU/lbmole): Kncis-1,2-DMCP=WHSV*ln(cis-1,2feed/cis-1,2product)exp(−20,000/(1.987*(WAT0F+459.6)−14.992)); where cis-1,2feed and cis-1,2product are the concentrations of cis-1,2-DMP in the feed and product, respectively, in weight percent, WAT is the weight average temperature expressed in degree Fahrenheit, and WHSV is the weight hourly space velocity defined as the weight of the feed (e.g., heptane) processed per hour, divided by the weight of the catalyst employed. As the plots indicate, the rate of the isomeric conversion reaction in the contacting vessel 110 may fall over time, in other words catalyst activity decreases with time. Without intending to be limited by theory, it is believed that this decrease in rate constant over time may be caused at least in part by catalyst coking, by moisture present in the heptane feed 100, by moisture in the catalyst in the reactor 110, or by combinations thereof. Thus, controlling of the moisture content in the reaction and/or controlling catalyst coking may help reduce catalyst deactivation and increase catalyst run life.
In an embodiment further illustrated by FIG. 3, the heptane feed 100 is dried by addition of a dryer 104 to the embodiment illustrated by FIG. 2. The heptane feed 100 first passes through the dryer 104, then the dried feed 107 enters a contacting vessel 110, and the output 120 may transfer the product to one or more fractionators 130 for further separation of impurities. The dryer 104 controls the moisture (or water) content in the feed 107 to the contacting vessel 110. The drying material and/or process may be any drying material and/or process known to those skilled in the art. Examples of drying materials that may be appropriate include type 4A, type 5A, and 13X molecular sieves, alumina, and silica gel. In an embodiment, three angstrom molecular sieves, Type 3A, are used in the dryer 104 to remove moisture from the feed 100. The moisture level, or dew point, of the dried feed 107 may impact the rate of the reaction that reduces the concentration of close boiling impurities in the contacting vessel. Thus, employing a dryer may help maintain a desirable level of isomerization of close boiling impurities in the contacting vessel 110. In an embodiment, passing the feed 100 through the dryer 104 results in a moisture (water) content of no more than about 10 parts per million by weight in the dried feed 107. In another embodiment, passing the feed 100 through the dryer 104 results in a moisture (water) content of no more than about 3 parts per million by weight in the dried feed 107. In another embodiment, passing the feed 100 through the dryer 104 results in a moisture (water) content of no more than about 1 part per million by weight in the dried feed 107. Moisture content may be measured by various methods including via Karl-Fischer titration, use of an on-line dew-point analyzer, or by gas chromatographic techniques.
In addition to controlling the level of moisture in the feed 100, moisture (water) on the catalyst in the reactor 110 may be controlled, as it may affect catalyst activity. Drying of the catalyst may be achieved prior to contacting with the heptane stream in the reactor 110. In addition, the catalyst may be dried at any time during the course of production in order to boost activity. In an embodiment, the catalyst is dried by heating the catalyst for several hours in flowing nitrogen. In another embodiment, the catalyst should be dried at about 200 degrees Celsius in flowing nitrogen, then cooled to ambient temperature. In another embodiment, once the catalyst has been dried, exposure to air, or any source of oxygen, is avoided.
In addition to or in lieu of controlling the moisture in the reactor (either in the heptane feed 100, in the catalyst in the reactor 110, or both), other process variables may be adjusted such as WAT, WHSV, or both to address a drop in rate constant such as that shown in FIG. 4.
The catalyst deactivates slowly with time, so the weight average temperature (WAT) in the reactor may be raised steadily to maintain a desirable conversion rate. WAT is commonly defined as the sum of n internal thermocouple temperatures in the reactor 110 divided by n ((t1+t2+ . . . tn.)/n). In an embodiment, both inlet and outlet temperatures are controlled, rather than only outlet temperature. In an embodiment where LZY-84 zeolite catalyst is employed, the start of run WAT is about 85 degrees Celsius and the end of run WAT is from about 165 to about 175 degrees Celsius, where the rate of daily increase of the WAT controls the amount of cis-1,2-DMCP in the reactor 110 effluent. In another embodiment, the WAT range is from about 60 degree Celsius to about 300 degrees Celsius. In another embodiment, the WAT range is from about 75 degree Celsius to about 220 degrees Celsius. In another embodiment, the WAT range is from about 85 degree Celsius to about 180 degrees Celsius. Another consideration is that at high enough temperatures, heptane cracking begins to occur. Thus, reactor temperatures are limited at all times by the rate of heptane cracking. In an embodiment, the heptane cracking reaction sets an upper limit on reactor WAT of about 300 degrees Celsius.
Increasing WAT of reactor 110 may be one way of compensating for deactivation of catalyst caused by moisture. However, raising reactor 110 temperature may increase coking on the catalyst, which accumulates to also decrease catalyst activity, and may not be removed by drying in flowing nitrogen. Thus, the moisture level in the dried heptane feed 107 may be conducive to an extended catalyst life by allowing temperatures to be kept lower, thereby minimizing coking. In an embodiment, the catalyst in the reactor reflects a change in WAT of from about 1 degree Celsius to about 10 degrees Celsius for about 1 weight percent of coke deposition. In another embodiment, the catalyst in the reactor reflects a change in WAT of from about 1 degree Celsius to about 5 degrees Celsius for about 1 weight percent of coke deposition. In another embodiment, the catalyst in the reactor reflects a change in WAT of from about 1 degree Celsius to about 2.5 degrees Celsius for about 1 weight percent of coke deposition.
In an embodiment of the purification method provided herein, the WHSV is from about 0.1 to about 10. In another embodiment, the WHSV is from about 0.1 to about 6. In another embodiment, the WHSV is from about 0.5 to about 5. In another embodiment, the WHSV is from about 1 to about 4. In another embodiment, the WHSV is from about 1.5 to about 3. In another embodiment, the WHSV is from about 1.5 to about 2.5.
In general, there is a trade-off between reactor 110 throughput as measured by WHSV and catalyst deactivation as measured by conversion of cis-1,2-DMCP. If constant conversion is desired and WHSV is increased, then WAT will have to be raised in order to maintain constant conversion. With increasing WAT, however, the catalyst will deactivate due to coking, so run lengths will decrease. Thus, maximizing run length means adjusting the WAT to meet the maximum allowable cis-1,2-DMCP concentration in the product 120. In an embodiment, the WAT corresponds to a WHSV of the dried heptane stream 107 through the reactor 110 of between about 1.5 and about 2.5. In an embodiment, the rate of LZY-84 zeolite catalyst deactivation at a WHSV between about 1.5 and about 2.5 comprises a change in WAT of about 2 degrees Celsius per day at about 85 wt % cis-1,2-DMCP conversion.
Other reactor parameters to be controlled include pressure and the length-to-diameter ratio (L/D), or reactor size. In an embodiment, the pressure is sufficient to keep heptane in the liquid phase. In another embodiment, the pressure is at least about equal to the vapor pressure of the heptane at the temperature employed. In another embodiment, the pressure is at least about 10 psig. In an embodiment, the L/D should be in the range from about 3 to about 35. In another embodiment, the L/D should be in the range from about 5 to about 30. In another embodiment, the L/D should be in the range from about 6 to about 25.
In an embodiment, catalyst activity is regenerated by burning coke off catalyst from the isomerization. In some embodiments, conditions effective for regenerating the catalyst may include temperatures from about 350 to about 600 degrees Celsius. In other embodiments, the catalyst is regenerated at a temperature in the range of 350 to 550 degrees Celsius. The regeneration if performed by burning coke off the catalyst in the presence of an oxygen containing gas. In some embodiments, coke is burned off the catalyst (the catalyst is regenerated) using air. In other embodiments, air is diluted with an inert gas. In some embodiment the inert gas may be argon, nitrogen or mixtures thereof. In some embodiments, the oxygen containing gas contains 0.1 to 21 percent, by volume, oxygen. In other embodiments, the oxygen containing gas contains is 0.2 to 15 percent by volume oxygen; alternatively 0.25 to 10 percent by volume oxygen; alternatively 0.5 to 6 percent, by volume oxygen. The time can be any time needed by the temperature and oxygen concentration conditions use to effectively bun the coke off the catalyst. In some embodiments, the regeneration time is 30 minutes to 24 hours. In other embodiment the regeneration time is between 2 and 12 hours. In yet another embodiment, the regeneration time is from 4 to 10 hours. As an example, a reactor prepared for catalyst regeneration may be purged with ambient nitrogen for 30 minutes to remove flammable material. After purging the reactor bed may be heated with hot nitrogen to a temperature in the range of 350 to 550 degrees Celsius, followed by bleeding air into the nitrogen steam such that the gas comprises from 0.25 to 0.5 percent, by volume, oxygen. Maximum bed temperature may be controlled by adjusting air flow. After oxygen breakthrough, the air bleed into the nitrogen stream may be increased to obtain a gas comprising 1.2 percent, by volume, oxygen, or as high a concentration of oxygen as is allowed, until the inlet and exit oxygen content are equal. Subsequently, the reactor may be purged of oxygen and moisture with hot nitrogen, at least about 550 degrees Celsius, and then purged and cooled with ambient nitrogen prior to re-introducing feed stocks to the reactor.
EXAMPLES
The following examples, 1 through 10, are merely representative of aspects of the present invention and, as one skilled in the art would recognize, the present invention may be practiced without many of the aspects illustrated by the examples.
Example 1
One drop of chlorosulfonic acid was added to about 1 ml of a heptane sample in a glass vessel and stirred for four hours. The sample was then washed three times with deionized water. The results from the analysis of the starting and ending hydrocarbon phase are shown in Table IV.










TABLE IV







n-heptane
Combined cis-1,2-DMCP and MCH



(wt %)
(wt %)


















starting material
99.441
0.476


after acid treatment
99.876
0.004









The results in Table IV show that treatment with acids may selectively remove the unwanted close boiling impurities cis-1,2-DMCP and MCH from n-heptane while not reacting with n-heptane.

The data in Examples 2 through 5 were obtained using a 1-inch inner diameter flow reactor. The reactor was 316 stainless steel construction, and it was 30 inches long. The catalyst was packed in the center of the reactor, and glass beads were used to fill the remaining volume above and below the active catalyst inside the reactor. Temperatures were controlled using an external electric furnace with three independent heating zones. The product analyses were determined using a Hewlett-Packard 5890 gas chromatograph equipped with a 50 meter boiling point column. Data entries for Examples 2 through 6 were recorded over time with a maximum time interval between first and last entries of about two days.
Example 2
In this example executed in downflow, acidized clay (Filtrol®-24) was used as the isomerization catalyst. The data in Table V show that the concentration of cis-1,2-DMCP could be reduced from 0.441 to as low as 0.282 weight percent in the temperature range of about 100° to 325° C. while the n-heptane concentration was reduced by less than 2 weight percent. This example shows that solid acids are an effective selective isomerization catalyst for removal of cis-1,2-DMCP. Also, this example shows that solid acidized clays are an effective selective isomerization catalyst for removal of cis-1,2-DMCP.



















TABLE V






Top
Mid
Bottom


cis-1,2-








Entry
Temp.
Temp.
Temp.
Lights
n-heptane
DMCP
MCH

Catalyst
Flow Rate
Pressure


No.
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
Catalyst
(grams)
(cc/min)
(psig)
WHSV



























1 (feed)
25
25
25
0.121
99.361
0.441
0.059
Filtrol-24
75.0
3.4
50
2.72


2
74
95
100
0.122
99.369
0.435
0.059
Filtrol-24
75.0
3.4
50
2.72


3
144
167
219
0.162
99.379
0.375
0.085
Filtrol-24
75.0
3.4
50
2.72


4
165
193
225
0.170
99.374
0.358
0.098
Filtrol-24
75.0
3.4
50
2.72


5
166
301
308
0.299
99.286
0.307
0.108
Filtrol-24
75.0
4.5
50
3.56


6
256
351
317
1.817
97.864
0.233
0.086
Filtrol-24
75.0
4.5
50
3.56


7
179
319
295
1.603
98.038
0.282
0.077
Filtrol-24
75.0
4.5
50
3.56









Example 3
LZY-84 was used as the catalyst in a downflow experiment. Comparison of the results in Table VI to Example 2 show that this “Y” zeolite, LZY-84, as compared to the acidized clay catalyst employed in Example 2, achieves desirable removal of cis-1,2-DMCP at temperatures about 100 to 150 degrees Celsius lower.




















TABLE VI






Top
Mid
Bottom


cis-1,2-




Flow




Entry
Temp
Temp
Temp
Lights
n-heptane
DMCP
MCH

Catalyst
Catalyst
Rate
Pressure


No.
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
Catalyst
(grams)
(mls)
(cc/min)
(psig)
WHSV




























1 (feed)
20
20
20
0.125
99.355
0.442
0.060
LZY-84
60.0
100.0
2.17
50



2
175
202
199
14.503
85.075
0.124
<0.010
LZY-84
60.0
100.0
2.17
50
2.17


3
166
189
190
9.287
90.477
0.158
<0.010
LZY-84
60.0
100.0
2.17
50
2.17









Example 4
LZY-84 was again used as the isomerization catalyst, but this time in an upflow experiment. Results are shown in Table VII. The concentration of cis-1,2-DMCP was reduced below detection limits at temperatures in excess of about 170° C. In addition, the n-heptane concentration was maintained at greater than 99.0 weight percent for temperatures up to about 170° C. In comparison to Example 3, the results in Example 4 show that a greater percentage of cis-1,2-DMCP was removed at the same temperatures while reducing the amount of n-heptane loss.




















TABLE VII






Top
Mid
Bottom


Cis-1,2-




Flow




Entry
Temp
Temp
Temp
Lights
n-heptane
DMCP
MCH

Catalyst
Catalyst
Rate
Pressure


No.
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
Catalyst
(grams)
(mls)
(cc/min)
(psig)
WHSV




























1 (feed)
25
25
25
0.122
99.360
0.440
0.060
LZY-84
50.0
104
1.0
300



2
165
170
155
0.468
99.197
0.018
0.316
LZY-84
50.0
104
1.0
300
1.20


3
172
175
163
0.814
98.812
<0.001
0.374
LZY-84
50.0
104
1.0
300
1.20


4
185
188
177
2.185
94.486
<0.001
0.330
LZY-84
50.0
104
1.0
300
1.20









Example 5
Data for Example 5, shown in Table VIII, shows that by using higher temperatures (i.e., greater than 180° C.), the concentration of MCH can be reduced as well as the concentration of cis-1,2-DMCP. The feed for this experiment was 5.7 weight percent MCH in pure grade n-heptane, and the experiment was done in upflow.




















TABLE VIII






Top
Mid
Bottom


Cis-1,2-




Flow




Entry
Temp
Temp
Temp
Lights
n-heptane
DMCP
MCH

Catalyst
Catalyst
Rate
Pressure


No.
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
Catalyst
(grams)
(mls)
(cc/min)
(psig)
WHSV




























1 (feed)
25
25
 25 (feed)
0.114
93.791
0.376
5.702
LZY-84
60.0
100.0
0.76
300



2
186
184
172
6.671
88.805
0.00
4.382
LZY-84
60.0
100.0
0.60
300
0.76


3
188
188
178
15.99
80.32
0.080
3.274
LZY-84
60.0
100.0
0.60
300
0.76









Example 6
Data for Example 6, shown in Table IX, shows the isomerization rate of cis-1,2-DMCP as a function of temperature using fresh “Y” zeolite, LZY-84 catalyst. The concentration of n-heptane can be maintained above 99.0% while removing virtually all of the cis-1,2-DMCP. This example was in upflow.




















TABLE IX






Top
Mid
Bottom


Cis-1,2-




Flow




Entry
Temp
Temp
Temp
Lights
n-heptane
DMCP
MCH

Catalyst
Catalyst
Rate
Pressure


No.
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
Catalyst
(grams)
(mls)
(cc/min)
(psig)
WHSV




























 1 (feed)
20
20
20
1.210
99.360
0.441
0.059
LZY-84
47.9
104
1.0
300



 2
24
24
21
0.132
99.363
0.400
0.089
LZY-84
47.9
104
1.0
300
1.25


 3
60
60
55
0.130
99.379
0.404
0.071
LZY-84
47.9
104
1.0
300
1.25


 4
53
52
44
0.130
99.427
0.376
0.066
LZY-84
47.9
104
1.0
300
1.25


 5
78
77
64
0.133
99.441
0.359
0.067
LZY-84
47.9
104
1.0
300
1.25


 6
93
92
81
0.130
99.420
0.275
0.062
LZY-84
47.9
104
1.0
300
1.25


 7
100
100
85
0.133
99.445
0.355
0.066
LZY-84
47.9
104
1.0
300
1.25


 8
127
125
101
0.171
99.532
0.210
0.086
LZY-84
47.9
104
1.0
300
1.25


 9
121
149
124
0.632
93.442
<0.001
0.238
LZY-84
47.9
104
1.2
300
1.50


10
159
156
130
1.363
98.268
<0.001
0.369
LZY-84
47.9
104
1.2
300
1.50


11
167
164
136
1.291
98.330
<0.001
0.379
LZY-84
47.9
104
1.2
300
1.50


12
142
142
124
0.587
99.035
<0.001
0.377
LZY-84
47.9
104
1.2
300
1.50









The data in Examples 7 and 8 were obtained using a 2-inch inner diameter flow reactor. The reactor was 316 stainless steel construction, and it was 48 inches long. The catalyst was packed in the reactor, and inert α-alumina (Alundum) was used to dilute the active catalyst inside the reactor. Temperatures were controlled using an external electric furnace with three independent heating zones. The isomerization reaction was operated in this continuous upflow reactor for 12 weeks. Initial process conditions were chosen from Example 6. An initial space velocity of 1.0 WHSV and WAT of 100° C. were chosen. The reactor was run continuously, 24 hours/day. The product analyses were determined using a Hewlett-Packard 5890 gas chromatograph equipped with a 50 meter boiling point column.
Also in Examples 7 and 8, an LZY-84 solid acidic zeolite catalyst was employed in the reactor. The LZY-84 catalyst was dried by heating to 225 degrees Celsius for four hours in flowing nitrogen. The heptane feed to the reactor was dried over Type 3A molecular sieve beads, such as are commercially available from Aldrich. The Type 3A molecular sieves have a pore size that limits adsorption to only water (and ammonia), and heptane is excluded from adsorbing on Type 3 sieves. Initially, the mole sieve drier was changed out every 60 hours. That period was subsequently shortened to 24-36 hours beginning with about the 700 hour point in Example 7, and for the entire duration of Example 8. Samples of the reactor product were taken about every four hours and analyzed by GC to determine component concentrations. WAT for Examples 7 and 8 was defined as the weighted (by weight of catalyst) average of internal thermocouple temperatures divided by the number (4) of internal thermocouples.
Example 7
This experiment had a duration of about 1,000 hours on-stream. Data from analyses of the reactor feed are shown in Table X, and data from the reactor effluent are shown in Table XI. Temperature (WAT) was raised in response to catalyst deactivation in order to keep the cis-1,2-DMCP concentration in the effluent at 0.085 weight percent. No attempts were made to regenerate the catalyst by burning off the coke at the end of the run. Predictions for catalyst run length may be made using the correlation of kncis-1,2-DMCP=1.107−0.0010*Hours(onstream), R2=0.82.







TABLE X







Reactor Feed Analyses













On-line Time
t-1,2-DMCP
n-heptane
Misc.
c-1,2-DMCP
MCH
Br Index


(hours)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(mgBr/100 gms)
















0
0.034
99.388
0.019
0.472
0.062



100
0.034
99.392
0.019
0.465
0.068


201.5
0.035
99.393
0.019
0.468
0.062


303
0.036
99.366
0.052
0.46
0.062


415
0.034
99.391
0.019
0.471
0.061
40.8


504
0.035
99.39
0.02
0.47
0.064


617
0.034
99.368
0.039
0.475
0.061


703
0.035
99.390
0.02
0.465
0.069


805
0.035
99.374
0.037
0.47
0.063


909
0.032
99.363
0.049
0.476
0.058


979
0.035
99.393
0.020
0.467
0.062
















TABLE XI





Reactor Effluent Analyses
























Hours
Top Temp
Mid Temp
Mid Temp
Bot Temp
WAT
Pressure
Feed rate
WHSV
Lights


On-line
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(psig)
(lb/hr)
(hr-1)
(wt %)





12.5
70
112
118
107.4
102
50.2
1.63
1.0
0.177


55
74
108
109.4
109.3
100
50
3.28
2.0
0.075


79
87
119
116.8
116.2
110
51
3.27
2.0
0.061


103
88
118
118.1
117.4
110
50.2
4.9
3.0
0.065


120
87
120
118.1
116.5
110
49
1.63
1.0
0.088


143
73
96
97.4
96.3
91
49.8
1.63
1.0
0.104


159
79
103
102.7
101.8
97
50.1
1.63
1.0
0.045


168
71
109
110.9
109.2
100
50.1
1.63
1.0
0.068


182
82
123
120.6
118.2
111
49.9
1.64
1.0
0.068


208.5
78
122
124.3
122.8
112
50
2.05
1.25
0.065


256
82
128
130.8
128.9
117
100.1
2.06
1.26
0.097


270
77
124
133.7
130.3
116
99.9
2.46
1.50
0.071


306
82
128
139.7
138.7
122
99.9
2.85
1.74
0.133


325
88
139
149.9
148.9
131
100.2
2.86
1.74
0.125


353
89
143
154
152.8
135
100.1
2.85
1.74
0.118


375
99
148
148
148
136
100
2.85
1.74
0.115


399
102
155
155.2
155.2
142
100.2
2.83
1.73
0.139


424
106
161
158.7
157.6
146
100.2
2.85
1.74
0.141


451
109
164
160.9
159.3
148
99.9
2.92
1.78
0.107


458
109
167
165.4
164.8
152
100
2.83
1.73
0.162


475
108
168
168.7
168.8
153
100
2.80
1.71
0.179


497
108
168
171.4
171.3
155
100.4
2.82
1.72
0.080


525
109
168
170.4
170.2
154
100.6
2.81
1.71
0.185


551
107
168
170.7
170.2
154
100.5
2.82
1.72
0.178


572
108
167
170.7
170.3
154
99.8
2.85
1.74
0.163


603
94
158
186.1
186.6
156
99.8
2.86
1.74
0.383


626
91
147
175.7
172.3
147
99.9
2.85
1.74
0.185


650
91
149
178.5
174.3
148
99.5
2.87
1.75
0.180


674
95
155
183.4
179.1
153
100.1
2.86
1.74
0.209


699
92
151
181.4
177.5
150
100
2.86
1.74
0.131


726
116.7
165.2
165.4
167.4
154
100.2
2.83
1.73
0.120


749
114.7
175.1
175.3
175.4
160
100.2
2.84
1.73
0.173


775
116.9
178.1
179.3
179.5
163
99.7
2.85
1.74
0.165


802
117.6
185.1
185.6
186
169
100.6
2.85
1.74
0.217


825
108.1
161.7
159.5
169.7
150
99.9
2.85
1.74
0.103


850
121.1
179.1
177.2
181.6
165
100.1
2.84
1.73
0.160


873
132
184.7
183.4
185.6
171
100
2.85
1.74
0.074


900
136.3
186.1
184.9
186.5
173
100.3
2.83
1.73
0.177


925
122.5
189.5
195.3
188.8
174
99.8
2.85
1.74
0.280


951
108.8
181.6
187
187.8
166
100.1
2.85
1.74
0.183


974
124.2
188.3
189.3
191.3
173
99.9
2.85
1.74
0.216


981
125.4
188.6
187.1
187.9
172
100
2.85
1.74
0.182

















Hours
t-1,2-DMCP
n-heptane
c-1,2-DMCP
MCH
c-1,2-DMCP
n-heptane
Br Index


On-line
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
% remvd
Δ wt %
(mgBr/100 g)





12.5
0.082
99.492
0
0.249
100
0.11


55
0.099
99.591
0.086
0.149
82
0.21


79
0.114
99.585
0.08
0.16
83
0.20


103
0.086
99.543
0.175
0.131
63
0.16


120
0.103
99.577
0.065
0.166
86
0.20


143
0.084
99.543
0.24
0.099
49
0.16


159
0.083
99.571
0.187
0.114
60
0.19


168
0.087
99.577
0.131
0.137
72
0.20


182
0.114
99.578
0.076
0.165
84
0.20


208.5
0.107
99.553
0.093
0.166
80
0.17


256
0.103
99.542
0.088
0.17
81
0.16


270
0.104
99.543
0.112
0.17
76
0.16


306
0.112
99.526
0.116
0.171
75
0.15


325
0.100
99.491
0.083
0.198
82
0.11


353
0.113
99.482
0.081
0.206
83
0.10


375
0.088
99.511
0.102
0.184
78
0.13


399
0.099
99.478
0.08
0.205
83
0.10


424
0.102
99.466
0.089
0.202
81
0.08
15.1


451
0.108
99.464
0.11
0.196
77
0.08


458
0.092
99.43
0.084
0.217
82
0.05


475
0.096
99.423
0.073
0.229
85
0.04


497
0.092
99.53
0.053
0.246
89
0.15


525
0.096
99.42
0.056
0.242
88
0.04


551
0.100
99.423
0.065
0.234
86
0.04
16.9


572
0.094
99.439
0.079
0.225
83
0.06


603
0.082
99.223
0.022
0.29
95
−0.16


626
0.097
99.412
0.068
0.238
86
0.03


650
0.096
99.409
0.085
0.23
82
0.03


674
0.095
99.382
0.069
0.244
85
0.00


699
0.070
99.449
0.287
0.117
39
0.07


726
0.104
99.471
0.093
0.212
80
0.09


749
0.095
99.425
0.078
0.229
83
0.04


775
0.093
99.424
0.098
0.219
79
0.04


802
0.093
99.379
0.064
0.247
86
0.00


825
0.103
99.439
0.172
0.182
63
0.06
21.4


850
0.093
99.429
0.091
0.227
81
0.05


873
0.086
99.521
0.084
0.236
82
0.14


900
0.090
99.412
0.089
0.232
81
0.03
21.3


925
0.095
99.335
0.03
0.261
94
−0.05


951
0.096
99.404
0.082
0.235
83
0.02


974
0.086
99.404
0.052
0.242
89
0.02


981
0.101
99.421
0.071
0.275
85
0.04
22.1









At the conclusion of the run, the spent catalyst was removed from the top, middle, and bottom of the catalyst bed and analyzed for coke deposition. The results are shown in Table XII. In this example, the catalyst had lost about 70 degrees Celsius of activity, and it had accumulated about 6 weight percent coke. Therefore, each incremental 1 weight percent of coke deposition approximately corresponded to about 11 degrees Celsius of catalyst deactivation.
The Bromine Index (defined as milligrams of Br necessary to titrate 100 grams of sample) was also measured and reported in Tables X and XI. Bromine Index is a measure of olefin content. The results show that the olefin content, as measured by Bromine Index, was reduced from about 40 in the feed to about 15 to 22 in the reactor effluent for the duration of the run.







TABLE XII







Spent Catalyst Analyses












Location
Example No.
C (wt %)
H (wt %)
















Top
7
4.81
1.96



Middle
7
6.54
1.92



Bottom
7
10.42
2.14



Top
8
2.83
2.21



Middle
8
4.84
2.24



Bottom
8
11.41
2.28










Example 8
This experiment had a duration of about 400 hours on-stream. Data from analyses of the reactor feed are shown in Table XIII, and data from the reactor effluent are shown in Table XIV. Temperature (WAT) was raised in response to catalyst deactivation in order to keep the cis-1,2-DMCP concentration in the reactor effluent at 0.085 weight percent. No attempts were made to regenerate the catalyst by burning off the coke at the end of the run.







TABLE XIII







Reactor Feed Analyses













On-line Time
t-1,2-DMCP
n-heptane
Misc.
c-1,2-DMCP
MCH
Br Index


(hours)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(mgBr/100 gms)
















8
0.034
99.39
0.02
0.472
0.061



26
0.033
99.357
0.053
0.475
0.06
38.7


107
0.033
99.36
0.049
0.476
0.06


171
0.032
99.36
0.049
0.477
0.058


314
0.035
99.373
0.036
0.471
0.063
















TABLE XIV





Reactor Effluent Analyses


























Middle
Middle
Bottom







Hours
Top T
Temp.
Temp.
Temp.
WAT
Pressure
Feed rate
WHSV
Lights


On-line
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(psig)
(lb/hr)
(hr−1)
(wt %)





1
76.1
98.2
98.1
90.8
91
100.0
2.86
1.74
0.081


25
102.5
119.1
120.2
118
115
99.7
2.87
1.75
0.138


54
105.7
119.8
120.4
119
116
99.9
2.85
1.74
0.121


79
104.6
119.4
120.1
118
116
99.9
2.84
1.73
0.087


103
102.7
118.8
119.9
118
115
100.0
2.85
1.74
0.097


127
105.7
119.5
119.8
118
116
99.9
2.85
1.74
0.088


148
107.1
125.6
124.1
122
120
99.8
2.88
1.76
0.085


172
107.2
126.9
125
123
121
99.6
2.86
1.74
0.029


199
115.6
131.9
128.3
126
126
99.9
2.85
1.74
0.090


224
108.1
131.9
130.6
129
125
100.0
2.86
1.74
0.094


250
106.5
134.6
133.5
132
127
100.0
2.85
1.74
0.074


275
116.4
138.6
135.1
133
131
100.0
2.85
1.74
0.073


302
121
141.5
138.1
137
134
100.0
2.85
1.74
0.076


328
123.1
142.4
140.3
140
137
100.3
2.84
1.73
0.112


358
119.8
146.2
140.8
138.9
136
101.2
2.84
1.73
0.110


367
122.9
142.2
139.9
140
136
100.1
2.86
1.74
0.102


376
125.7
143.8
141.2
141.2
138
100.3
2.85
1.74
0.103


388
126.2
144.1
141.6
141.3
138
100
2.85
1.74
0.098


















t-1,2-

c-1,2-

c-1,2-




Hours
DMCP
n-heptane
DMCP
MCH
DMCP
n-heptane
Br Index


On-line
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
% remvd
Δ wt %
(mgBr/100 g)





1
0.106
99.615
0.05
0.147
89
0.23


25
0.096
99.526
0.019
0.222
96
0.15
19.9


54
0.101
99.547
0.026
0.205
94
0.17


79
0.105
99.58
0.038
0.19
92
0.20


103
0.107
99.566
0.051
0.178
89
0.19
21.6


127
0.105
99.568
0.074
0.165
84
0.19


148
0.095
99.567
0.083
0.17
82
0.19


172
0.037
99.679
0.086
0.17
82
0.30


199
0.102
99.547
0.091
0.169
81
0.17


224
0.107
99.539
0.084
0.176
82
0.16


250
0.112
99.553
0.082
0.18
83
0.17


275
0.111
99.547
0.092
0.177
80
0.17


302
0.021
99.633
0.09
0.18
81
0.25


328
0.107
99.519
0.061
0.2
87
0.14


358
0.106
99.525
0.061
0.197
87
0.14


367
0.102
99.527
0.083
0.185
82
0.15


376
0.104
99.524
0.087
0.183
82
0.14
17.1


388
0.103
99.525
0.098
0.176
79
0.14









At the conclusion of the run, the spent catalyst was removed from the top, middle, and bottom of the catalyst bed and analyzed for coke deposition. The results are shown above in Table XII. The loss in activity during the test in Example 8 was about 5 degrees Celsius per 1 weight percent coke. Fresh catalyst has 0 weight percent carbon.
The Bromine Index was also measured and reported. The results show that the olefin content, as measured by Bromine Index, was reduced from about 38 to 40 in the feed to about 17 to 22 in the reactor effluent for the duration of the run.
A detailed GC analysis of a composite sample of the heptane product from the test in Example 8 is shown below in Table XV. The data in Table XV shows the reduction of about 80 to 90 weight percent of the cis-1,2-DMCP in the product heptane.







TABLE XV







Reactor Aggregate Product Heptane Analysis From Example 8












compound
BP (° F.)
BP (° C.)
Time (min.)
Area Counts
Area %















light (BP < 165 F.)


0.792
40.60
0.001


light (BP < 165 F.)


1.715
78.90
0.003


light (BP < 165 F.)


4.436
30.30
0.001


light (BP < 165 F.)


6.15
109.74
0.004


light (BP < 165 F.)


6.431
21.96
0.001


light (BP < 165 F.)


7.454
53.70
0.002


Acetone, ignore


7.497
1346.4
0.000


light (BP < 165 F.)


9.015
40.50
0.001


light (BP < 165 F.)


10.322
44.50
0.002


light (BP < 165 F.)


13.905
164.30
0.006


light (BP < 165 F.)


14.862
38.00
0.001


1,1-dimethylcyclopentane
190.1
87.8
17.531
47.10
0.002


2,3-dimethylpentane
193.6
89.8
17.285
243.47
0.009


2-methylhexane
194.1
90.1
17.09
1382.23
0.049


cis-1,3-dimethylcyclopentane
195.4
90.8
18.624
1978.65
0.070


trans-1,3-dimethylcyclopentane
197.1
91.7
18.926
1732.24
0.061


3-methylhexane
197.3
91.8
17.966
1460.30
0.051


trans-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane
197.4
91.9
19.215
2874.25
0.101


3-ethylpentane
200.3
93.5
19.068
589.56
0.021


unidentified
~205
96.1
20.175
19.95
0.001


n-heptane
209.2
98.4
21.014
2820757.45
99.306


Isooctane (2,2,4-trimethylpentane)
210.3
99.1
19.436
734.55
0.026


cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane
211.2
99.6
23.103
2201.00
0.077


methylcyclohexane
213.7
100.9
23.204
5562.60
0.196


ethylcyclopentane
218.2
103.4
24.888
147.60
0.005


toluene
231.1
110.6
28.4
30.20
0.001


heavy (BP > 230 F.)


38.513
80.00
0.003


total



2840463.65
100.00









Example 9
459 gallons of the reactor effluent from Example 8 was supplied to a fractionator. The feed to the fractionator possessed an average purity of 99.464 weight percent n-heptane and 0.082 weight percent cis-1,2-DMCP. Results of the fractionation are shown in Table XVI. The run produced 288 gallons of PRF n-heptane with an average purity of 99.757 weight percent n-heptane and 0.032 weight percent cis-1,2-DMCP. The fractionation was run at about 5 psig. The kettle temperature was about 93 to 99° C. The column was run at 110 inches H2O Δp (about 95 percent of flood point). Overhead rate varied between 10 and 20 pounds per hour. Running at higher pressure makes the cut easier. The distillation was performed over a period of 13 days. The column overhead was sampled every four to six hours and analyzed using a gas chromatograph using a boiling point column. Thus, order of dilution is from lowest to highest boiling component.







TABLE XVI





Isomerized Heptane Fractionation at 5 psig (Component Concentration (wt. %)

























cis-1,3-
trans-1 ,3-

trans-1,2-



Sample Date
2-Methyl-
3-Methyl-
Dimethyl-
Dimethyl-
3-Ethyl-
Dimethyl-


(Time)
hexane
hexane
cyclopentane
cyclopentane
pentane
cyclopentane
Isooctane





6/12/02
0.474
0.689
0.812
0.861
0.384
1.49
0.009


(11:54 AM)


6/13/02
0.083
0.132
0.145
0.159
0.077
0.277
0.027


(11:00 AM)


6/13/02
0.046
0.084
0.086
0.102
0.058
0.181
0.023


(4:48 PM)


6/13/02
0.008
0.018
0.017
0.022
0.017
0.041
0.027


(9:51 PM)


6/14/02
0
0.008
0.006
0.009
0.008
0.017
0.025


(1:45 AM)


6/14/02
0
0.004
0.003
0.006
0.006
0.01
0.025


(6:51 AM)


6/19/02
1.129
1.147
1.567
1.392
0.421
2.272
0.002


(1:08 PM)


6/19/02
0.194
0.243
0.298
0.294
0.115
0.494
0.002


(6:23 PM)


6/19/02
0.046
0.071
0.078
0.085
0.04
0.146
0.009


(9:46 PM)


6/20/02
0.027
0.049
0.052
0.059
0.03
0.105
0.013


(12:53 AM)


6/20/02
0.023
0.041
0.044
0.051
0.028
0.09
0.015


(4:11 AM)


6/20/02
0.018
0.035
0.036
0.043
0.024
0.077
0.014


(8:07 AM)


6/20/02
0.014
0.029
0.029
0.037
0.022
0.066
0.014


(12:33 PM)


6/20/02
0.008
0.015
0.014
0.019
0.013
0.035
0.021


(7:34 PM)


6/21/02
0.002
0.006
0.005
0.006
0
0.014
0.024


(1:28 AM)


6/21/02
0.001
0.005
0.006
0.007
0
0.012
0.024


(4:50 AM)


6/21/02
0.003
0.006
0.006
0.008
0.005
0.013
0.026


(7:01 AM)


6/21/02
0
0.003
0.004
0.003
0
0.009
0.028


(12:36 PM)


6/21/02
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.005
0.004
0.008
0.03


(5:59 PM)


6/21/02
0
0
0
0
0
0.002
0.032


(10:07 PM)


6/22/02
0
0
0
0.002
0
0.004
0.037


(1:45 AM)


6/22/02
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.037


(8:21 AM)


6/22/02
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.04


(1:02 PM)


6/22/02
0
0
0
0
0
0.002
0.04


(6:00 PM)


6/23/02
0
0.003
0
0.002
0
0
0.042


(2:32 AM)


6/23/02
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.044


(2:32 AM)


6/23/02
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.048


(6:28 AM)


6/23/02
0
0
0.002
0
0
0.003
0.051


(12:48 PM)


6/23/02
0.029
0.026
0.037
0.032
0.007
0.048
0.048


(10:19 PM)


6/24/02
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.045


(1:52 AM)


6/24/02
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.05


(10:36 AM)


6/24/02
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.05


(2:10 PM)






















cis-1,2-

cis,cis-1,2,3-





Sample Date


Dimethyl-
Methyl-
Trimethyl-



(Time)
n-Heptane
C7
cyclopentane
cyclohexane
cyclopentane
Toluene
Others







6/12/02
94.894
0
0
0.018
0.002
0
0.367



(11:54 AM)



6/13/02
98.976
0
0.048
0.022
0
0
0.054



(11:00 AM)



6/13/02
99.349
0
0.033
0
0
0
0.038



(4:48 PM)



6/13/02
99.788
0
0.035
0
0
0
0.027



(9:51 PM)



6/14/02
99.871
0
0.038
0
0
0
0.018



(1:45 AM)



6/14/02
99.885
0
0.042
0
0
0
0.019



(6:51 AM)



6/19/02
91.591
0
0
0.013
0
0.001
0.465



(1:08 PM)



6/19/02
98.28
0
0
0.013
0
0
0.067



(6:23 PM)



6/19/02
99.479
0
0.018
0
0
0
0.028



(9:46 PM)



6/20/02
99.618
0
0.025
0
0
0
0.022



(12:53 AM)



6/20/02
99.655
0
0.026
0
0
0
0.027



(4:11 AM)



6/20/02
99.697
0
0.028
0
0
0
0.028



(8:07 AM)



6/20/02
99.708
0
0.028
0
0
0
0.053



(12:33 PM)



6/20/02
99.827
0
0.035
0
0
0
0.013



(7:34 PM)



6/21/02
99.863
0
0.057
0
0
0
0.023



(1:28 AM)



6/21/02
99.869
0
0.042
0
0
0
0.034



(4:50 AM)



6/21/02
99.839
0
0.057
0.014
0
0.001
0.022



(7:01 AM)



6/21/02
99.858
0
0.057
0.015
0.001
0
0.022



(12:36 PM)



6/21/02
99.874
0
0.048
0
0
0
0.024



(5:59 PM)



6/21/02
99.839
0
0
0.07
0
0.001
0.056



(10:07 PM)



6/22/02
99.848
0
0.071
0.023
0
0
0.015



(1:45 AM)



6/22/02
99.839
0
0.076
0.032
0
0
0.016



(8:21 AM)



6/22/02
99.82
0
0
0.078
0
0
0.062



(1:02 PM)



6/22/02
99.816
0
0
0.083
0
0.001
0.058



(6:00 PM)



6/23/02
99.788
0
0.041
0
0
0.001
0.123



(2:32 AM)



6/23/02
99.805
0
0.09
0.047
0
0
0.014



(2:32 AM)



6/23/02
99.716
0
0.107
0.119
0
0
0.01



(6:28 AM)



6/23/02
99.766
0
0
0.099
0
0
0.079



(12:48 PM)



6/23/02
99.594
0
0.097
0.04
0.001
0.001
0.04



(10:19 PM)



6/24/02
99.866
0
0.001
0.068
0
0.001
0.019



(1:52 AM)



6/24/02
99.769
0
0.099
0.065
0
0.001
0.016



(10:36 AM)



6/24/02
99.679
0
0
0.116
0.001
0
0.154



(2:10 PM)










Example 10
An n-heptane feed was subjected to an isomerization reaction in an effort to reduce the concentration of close boiling impurities. The isomerized product was then purified via fractionation. The reactor for the isomerization was a portable dryer that was 9 feet long and 12 inches in diameter. The catalyst was UOP LZY-84, 1/16 inch extrudate. Approximately 250 pounds of the catalyst was employed in the dryer. The heptane feed was rolled over a 4A molecular sieve for drying. The feed was preheated to 93.3 degrees Celsius and fed through the reactor with an outlet temperature from 71.1 degrees Celsius to 87.8 degrees Celsius. The reactor product was circulated back to the feed tank (reactor operated like recirculation reactor). Table XVII contains data showing the inlet and outlet component concentrations for the reactor.







TABLE XVII





Inlet and Outlet Component Concentrations Over Time for Recirculation Reactor


























cis-1,3-
trans-1,3-

trans-1,2-




Sample Date
2-Methyl-
3-Methyl-
Dimethyl-
Dimethyl-
3-Ethyl-
Dimethyl-


(Time)
hexane
hexane
cyclopentane
cyclopentane
pentane
cyclopentane
Isooctane
n-Heptane



















7/30/03
Feed
0.015
0.032
0.026
0.067
0
0.091
0
99.136


(11:59PM)
Effluent
0.014
0.035
0.034
0.067
0
0.103
0.047
99.187


7/31/03
Feed
0.016
0.036
0.037
0.067
0
0.108
0.047
99.143


(7:35 AM)
Effluent
0.017
0.036
0.043
0.066
0
0.114
0.046
99.16


8/1/03
Feed
0.023
0.043
0.056
0.064
0
0.13
0.043
99.151


(1:17 AM)
Effluent
0.024
0.044
0.057
0.065
0
0.138
0.052
99.171


8/2/03
Feed
0.028
0.047
0.064
0.063
0
0.148
0.046
99.136


(0:51 AM)
Effluent
0.029
0.046
0.065
0.063
0
0.148
0.045
99.191





















cis-1,2-

cis,cis-1,2,3-






Sample Date

Dimethyl-
Methyl-
Trimethyl-


Bromine



(Time)
C7
cyclopentane
cyclohexane
cyclopentane
Toluene
Others
Number





















7/30/03
Feed
0
0.284
0.069
0.001
0.001
0.278




(11:59PM)
Effluent
0
0.239
0.077
0.001
0.002
0.194



7/31/03
Feed
0
0.221
0.082
0
0
0.243
0.002



(7:35 AM)
Effluent
0
0.196
0.088
0.001
0.001
0.232
0.008



8/1/03
Feed
0
0.123
0.107
0.001
0.002
0.257



(1:17 AM)
Effluent
0
0.114
0.111
0.002
0.001
0.221



8/2/03
Feed
0
0.07
0.121
0.001
0.002
0.274



(0:51 AM)
Effluent
0
0.065
0.126
0.001
0.004
0.217










The reactor effluent recorded in Table XVII was subsequently fed to a fractionator. The fractionator was 68 feet tall, 10 inches in diameter, and packed with 1⁄2′′ steel Pall rings. These factors would typically correspond to a fractionator with about 45 stages. Table XVIII shows the equipment/process settings for the fractionation and the results of the fractionation. The data show that the concentration of n-heptane in the product stream is capable of exceeding 99.9 weight percent.







TABLE XVIII





Fractionation Settings and Fractionation Product Results in Weight Percent


























Kettle
Top
Column
Differential
Overhead



Cis-1,3-
trans-1,3-


Date
Temp.
Temp.
Pressure
Pressure
Flowrate

2-Methyl
3-Methyl
Dimethyl-
Dimethyl-


(Time)
(° F.)
(° F.)
(psig)
(psi)
(units)
n-Heptane
Hexane
Hexane
cyclopentane
cyclopentane





7/25/03





99.175
0
0.043
0.009
0.11


(8:41)


7/25/03
290.8
81.7
36.9
−0.6
0.2
99.074
0.002
0.038
0.011
0.104


(10:10)


7/25/03
287.5
88.1
32.7
0.4
2.8
98.753
0.004
0.041
0.016
0.108


(14:03)


7/25/03
263.3
111.5
20.6
3.4
22.9
98.377
0.086
0.102
0.119
0.101


(18:13)


7/26/03
250.5
126.6
14.8
2.8
22.6
98.828
0.078
0.096
0.112
0.097


(0:10)


7/26/03
250.0
141.5
14.2
2.9
23.0
98.58
0.113
0.13
0.155
0.129


(8:39)


7/26/03
250.0
151.1
14.1
3.4
24.5
98.725
0.116
0.135
0.162
0.138


(13:57)


7/26/03
250.0
155.8
14.4
3.6
24.3
98.756
0.113
0.134
0.162
0.136


(18:02)


7/26/03
250.1
156.6
14.2
3.6
24.0
98.811
0.109
0.131
0.155
0.134


(23:52)


7/27/03
250.0
156.2
14.1
3.7
24.3
98.889
0.1
0.124
0.147
0.127


(7:53)


7/27/03
250.1
154.6
14.2
3.8
23.9
98.904
0.097
0.125
0.142
0.124


(11:16)


7/27/03
250.1
158.7
14.5
3.8
23.5
99.046
0.081
0.108
0.124
0.11


(18:07)


7/27/03
250.1
158.8
14.2
3.9
23.0
99.081
0.077
0.104
0.119
0.105


(23:45)


7/28/03
250.0
159.5
14.0
3.9
23.1
99.116
0.071
0.095
0.11
0.095


(6:30)


7/28/03
249.9
159.4
14.3
3.9
23.2
99.177
0.064
0.088
0.101
0.093


(12:47)


7/28/03
250.1
163.3
14.7
3.9
21.6
99.26
0.055
0.077
0.09
0.081


(18:09)


7/28/03
250.1
163.2
14.4
4.0
21.7
99.311
0.048
0.074
0.081
0.079


(23:54)


7/29/03
250.1
164.0
14.1
3.9
21.6
99.355
0.043
0.066
0.075
0.072


(6:31)


7/30/03
235.0
159.2
12.8
3.6
2.4
99.376
0.038
0.062
0.07
0.07


(18:31)


7/31/03
250.0
161.1
14.1
4.1
0.1
99.358
0.041
0.067
0.075
0.075


(14:27)


7/31/03
250.0
159.7
14.6
3.0
26.1
99.016
0.046
0.085
0.106
0.126


(19:04)


8/1/03
250.1
125.6
14.4
1.6
23.4
99.075
0.029
0.053
0.085
0.079


(7:36)


8/1/03
250.1
110.7
14.9
1.5
3.7
98.641
0.044
0.074
0.12
0.102


(13:04)


8/1/03
266.9
121.3
22.1
1.4
18.5
99.394
0.017
0.033
0.051
0.052


(18:20)


8/2/03
270.0
138.4
23.4
1.8
47.8
99.552
0.003
0.01
0.008
0.01


(0:02)


8/2/03
270.1
151.1
23.1
1.9
49.4
99.684
0.001
0.009
0.009
0.017


(6:37)


8/2/03
270.0
155.5
23.5
2.0
20.6
99.763
0.005
0.01
0.012
0.013


(12:05)


8/2/03
270.2
154.2
23.3
1.8
21.1
99.327
0.021
0.04
0.067
0.062


(18:07)


8/2/03
270.3
125.5
23.2
1.2
11.5
98.546
0.053
0.086
0.137
0.116


(23:52)







Start Batch Operation

















8/3/03
270.2
111.8
23.0
0.8
2.0
51.27
0
0.298
1.75
5.753


(6:16)


8/3/03
270.2
112.2
23.3
0.7
0.8
97.239
0.142
0.197
0.335
0.218


(9:01)


8/3/03
271.2
173.9
23.0
23.3
7.9
98.685
0.064
0.117
0.193
0.17


(15:07)


8/3/03
272.2
269.0
23.2
10.8
29.1
99.227
0.028
0.059
0.096
0.107


(18:23)


8/4/03
272.3
197.9
23.4
2.4
25.6
99.408
0.019
0.001
0.06
0.144


(0:09)


8/4/03
274.7
125.4
26.8
1.3
17.1
98.656
0.03
0.053
0.088
0.076


(18:03)


8/5/03
246.2
130.9
12.8
7.1
12.7
97.867
0.128
0.198
0.358
0.256


(18:22)


8/6/03
235.2
229.5
8.8
37.0
15.9
97.695
0.135
0.223
0.391
0.303


(0:04)


8/6/03
235.3
229.0
8.4
48.3
17.3
97.014
0.175
0.296
0.52
0.405


(5:39)


8/6/03
235.2
229.6
8.5
39.6
19.1
97.879
0.105
0.199
0.313
0.294


(13:13)


8/6/03
235.1
179.4
9.5
3.8
23.1
98.92
0.054
0.089
0.124
0.11


(18:31)


8/7/03
230.9
180.7
7.5
63.5
15.1
98.803
0.049
0.113
0.174
0.197


(5:51)







Start New Batch

















8/8/03
229.7
171.0
8.5
63.7
5.3
92.957
0.658
0.764
1.161
0.99


(9:31)


8/8/03
224.8
208.7
6.0
101.4
9.5
95.913
0.365
0.45
0.657
0.582


(18:16)


8/8/03
258.5
246.2
17.3
120.0
14.8
98.543
0.113
0.169
0.219
0.19


(23:08)


8/9/03
254.4
242.6
16.2
120.0
1.0
98.676
0.102
0.152
0.196
0.173


(6:18)


8/9/03
258.8
248.1
17.8
120.0
13.8
99.075
0.057
0.103
0.128
0.145


(17:36)


8/9/03
262.9
253.0
19.4
120.0
18.8
99.46
0.029
0.057
0.068
0.084


(23:27)


8/10/03
259.4
249.2
17.8
120.0
17.5
99.472
0.025
0.054
0.065
0.084


(6:23)


8/10/03
259.2
248.9
18.0
120.0
20.3
99.723
0.011
0.026
0.028
0.043


(11:42)


8/10/03
264.4
254.3
19.5
120.0
7.8
99.448
0.024
0.058
0.069
0.096


(17:53)


8/10/03
262.9
252.9
19.9
120.0
6.5
99.337
0.026
0.068
0.08
0.121


(23:42)


8/11/03
259.2
248.8
17.8
120.0
12.1
99.734
0.006
0.021
0.024
0.046


(8:15)


8/11/03
261.1
250.9
18.8
119.9
35.8
99.884
0.001
0.007
0.007
0.017


(12:36)


8/11/03
267.4
258.0
21.4
120.0
52.0
99.905
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.005


(18:37)


8/11/03
269.4
259.7
21.8
120.0
63.9
99.938
0.001
0.005
0.006
0.013


(23:11)


8/12/03
267.4
257.5
21.1
120.0
64.0
99.87
0.001
0
0.002
0.007


(6:17)


8/12/03
267.5
257.9
21.3
120.0
89.6
99.83
0
0
0.001
0.003


(11:24)


8/12/03
269.5
260.3
22.2
120.1
82.5
99.88
0
0
0
0


(18:06)


8/13/03
265.4
255.7
20.2
120.1
50.8
99.888
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.002


(0:05)


8/13/03
261.2
251.0
18.4
120.0
51.4
99.89
0.001
0
0
0


(5:45)


8/13/03
261.7
251.6
18.3
120.0
64.6
99.899
0
0.001
0
0.031


(12:24)


8/13/03
268.3
258.9
21.4
120.0
64.8
99.876
0
0
0
0


(18:46)


8/13/03
268.7
259.0
21.6
120.1
65.2
99.816
0
0
0
0


(23:52)


8/14/03
265.5
255.7
20.3
120.0
65.7
99.758
0
0
0
0


(6:07)


8/14/03
264.5
254.5
19.7
120.0
46.3
99.762
0.001
0.002
0.001
0


(10:01)







Start New Batch

















8/17/03
246.8
160.1
20.0
119.5
1.5
77.868
2.026
2.644
3.775
3.085


(3:22)


8/17/03
256.8
243.9
16.9
120.0
14.2
90.733
0.713
1.09
1.491
1.315


(7:02)


8/17/03
256.2
243.5
16.6
120.0
13.5
94.476
0.362
0.633
0.844
0.79


(12:05)


8/17/03
259.7
249.9
18.1
105.5
6.7
96.502
0.002
0.389
0.503
0.561


(22:11)


8/18/03
259.7
250.1
18.1
115.1
9.8
97.547
0.119
0.266
0.335
0.416


(7:03)






















trans-1,2-


Cis-1,2-
Methyl-

cis,cis-1,2,3-



Date
3-Ethyl
Dimethyl-


Dimethyl-
cyclo-

Trimethyl-



(Time)
Pentane
cyclopentane
Isooctane
C7
cyclopentane
hexane
Toluene
cyclopentane







7/25/03
0
0.098
0.021
0
0.212
0
0
0



(8:41)



7/25/03
0
0.102
0.024
0
0.215
0
0.002
0.001



(10:10)



7/25/03
0
0.118
0.023
0
0.21
0
0
0



(14:03)



7/25/03
0.087
0.315
0.035
0
0.021
0.088
0
0



(18:13)



7/26/03
0.084
0.299
0.035
0
0.022
0.095
0.001
0



(0:10)



7/26/03
0.11
0.402
0.028
0
0.019
0.063
0
0.001



(8:39)



7/26/03
0.117
0.426
0.023
0
0.017
0.037
0
0



(13:57)



7/26/03
0.116
0.423
0.023
0
0.017
0.037
0
0



(18:02)



7/26/03
0.115
0.417
0.026
0
0.017
0.031
0.001
0



(23:52)



7/27/03
0.113
0.399
0.021
0
0.016
0.029
0
0



(7:53)



7/27/03
0.111
0.392
0.025
0
0.016
0.025
0.001
0



(11:16)



7/27/03
0.1
0.345
0.021
0
0.017
0.027
0
0



(18:07)



7/27/03
0.097
0.334
0.022
0
0.016
0.029
0
0



(23:45)



7/28/03
0.319
0
0.022
0
0.016
0.028
0.001
0



(6:30)



7/28/03
0.089
0.295
0.023
0
0.016
0.024
0
0



(12:47)



7/28/03
0.266
0
0.024
0
0.016
0.027
0.001
0.001



(18:09)



7/28/03
0.248
0
0.025
0
0.016
0.027
0.001
0.001



(23:54)



7/29/03
0.23
0
0.02
0
0.018
0.025
0
0.001



(6:31)



7/30/03
0.217
0
0.025
0
0.017
0.023
0
0



(18:31)



7/31/03
0.231
0
0.023
0
0.016
0.023
0
0.001



(14:27)



7/31/03
0.318
0
0.024
0
0.038
0.03
0
0



(19:04)



8/1/03
0
0.183
0.035
0
0.07
0.076
0.001
0.001



(7:36)



8/1/03
0.256
0.033
0
0
0.065
0.063
0.001
0.002



(13:04)



8/1/03
0
0.115
0.034
0
0.062
0.086
0.001
0



(18:20)



8/2/03
0.015
0.03
0.047
0
0.04
0.18
0
0.002



(0:02)



8/2/03
0
0.036
0.043
0
0.033
0.124
0
0.001



(6:37)



8/2/03
0.02
0.041
0.001
0
0.025
0.046
0
0



(12:05)



8/2/03
0
0.14
0.033
0
0.063
0.074
0
0.001



(18:07)



8/2/03
0
0.296
0.031
0
0.064
0.06
0.003
0



(23:52)



Start Batch Operation



8/3/03
0
0.037
0
37.81
0.057
0.014
0.045
0



(6:16)



8/3/03
0
0.597
0.02
0
0.05
0.031
0.005
0.002



(9:01)



8/3/03
0.407
0
0.012
0
0.026
0.011
0.002
0.001



(15:07)



8/3/03
0.227
0
0.017
0
0.029
0.012
0.001
0



(18:23)



8/4/03
0
0.022
0.001
0
0.017
0
0.001
0



(0:09)



8/4/03
0
0.177
0.04
0
0.083
0.084
0
0



(18:03)



8/5/03
0
0.681
0.019
0
0.035
0
0.001
0



(18:22)



8/6/03
0
0.774
0.015
0
0
0.035
0.002
0.001



(0:04)



8/6/03
0
1.03
0.012
0
0
0.023
0.001
0.001



(5:39)



8/6/03
0.683
0
0.013
0
0
0.028
0
0



(13:13)



8/6/03
0
0.263
0.025
0
0.043
0.04
0
0.001



(18:31)



8/7/03
0.414
0
0.018
0
0.028
0.002
0
0



(5:51)



Start New Batch



8/8/03
0.694
2.224
0.002
0
0
0.021
0
0.001



(9:31)



8/8/03
0.437
1.322
0.014
0
0.001
0.03
0.001
0



(18:16)



8/8/03
0
0.488
0.001
0
0
0.01
0
0



(23:08)



8/9/03
0
0.44
0.002
0
0
0.011
0.001
0.001



(6:18)



8/9/03
0
0.323
0
0
0.009
0
0.001
0.001



(17:36)



8/9/03
0
0.18
0
0
0.009
0.002
0.003
0.001



(23:27)



8/10/03
0
0.179
0.004
0
0.011
0
0.001
0



(6:23)



8/10/03
0
0.086
0.006
0
0.014
0
0
0.002



(11:42)



8/10/03
0.193
0
0
0
0
0.009
0
0.001



(17:53)



8/10/03
0
0.239
0.001
0
0.008
0.001
0
0



(23:42)



8/11/03
0.076
0
0
0
0.011
0.001
0
0.002



(8:15)



8/11/03
0
0.026
0.007
0
0.017
0
0.001
0.001



(12:36)



8/11/03
0.008
0.013
0.013
0
0.024
0
0.002
0.001



(18:37)



8/11/03
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.001
0



(23:11)



8/12/03
0.007
0.019
0.003
0
0.048
0.001
0.001
0.001



(6:17)



8/12/03
0.024
0
0
0
0.018
0.002
0.001
0.001



(11:24)



8/12/03
0.002
0.003
0.024
0
0.055
0.016
0
0.003



(18:06)



8/13/03
0
0.022
0.001
0
0.001
0.002
0.002
0



(0:05)



8/13/03
0
0.021
0
0
0.005
0
0
0



(5:45)



8/13/03
0
0.001
0
0.001
0.017
0
0.001
0.003



(12:24)



8/13/03
0
0
0.035
0
0.068
0.018
0
0



(18:46)



8/13/03
0
0.04
0
0
0.082
0.026
0.001
0



(23:52)



8/14/03
0
0.056
0.001
0
0.04
0
0.001
0.002



(6:07)



8/14/03
0.001
0.052
0
0
0.108
0.026
0.002
0



(10:01)



Start New Batch



8/17/03
2.373
7.455
0
0
0
0.002
0.001
0.001



(3:22)



8/17/03
1.189
3.272
0
0
0
0.004
0.003
0.003



(7:02)



8/17/03
0.792
1.993
0.001
0
0
0.002
0.001
0.004



(12:05)



8/17/03
0
1.293
0
0
0
0.005
0.001
0



(22:11)



8/18/03
0
0.914
0.002
0
0
0.004
0.001
0.002



(7:03)










Bromine Index data was also collected on samples from the streams recorded in Tables XVII and XIX. The Bromine Index was 11.3 for the reactor feed, 5.3 for the reactor effluent, 1.6 for the fractionation product, thus showing olefin elimination from the heptane between the reactor feed and fractionator product in the range of about 86 weight percent by Bromine Index.
While the present invention has been illustrated and described in terms of particular apparatus and methods of use, it is apparent that equivalent techniques and ingredients may be substituted for those shown, and other changes can be made within the scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
The particular embodiments disclosed herein are illustrative only, as the invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the claims below.

## Claims

1. A method of removing impurities from a heptane stream comprising:
contacting the heptane stream with an acidic catalyst, wherein said contacting reduces a concentration of one or more close boiling impurities and one or more olefins in the heptane stream, and wherein the catalyst reduces the concentration of both the one or more close boiling impurities and the one or more olefins in a single contacting step.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the concentration of olefins is reduced by at least about 25 percent by weight.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein said close boiling impurities comprise boiling points at a standard pressure of 760 Torr that are in the range of about 96.5 degrees to about 100.5 degrees Celsius.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein said close boiling impurities comprise boiling points at a standard pressure of 760 Torr that are in the range of about 97.0 to about 100.3 degrees Celsius.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein said close boiling impurities comprise boiling points at a standard pressure of 760 Torr that are in the range of about 97.5 to about 100.0 degrees Celsius.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein said close boiling impurities comprise cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein a concentration of cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane in the heptane stream is reduced by at least about 25 percent by weight.

8. The method of claim 6 wherein a concentration of cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane in the heptane stream is reduced by at least about 70 percent by weight.

9. The method of claim 6 wherein a concentration of cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane in the heptane stream is reduced by at least about 85 percent by weight.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein said close boiling impurities comprise methylcyclohexane.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein a concentration of methylcyclohexane in the heptane stream is reduced by at least about 10 percent by weight.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein said heptane stream comprises at least about 90 weight percent n-heptane.

13. The method of claim 1 wherein said heptane stream comprises at least about 94 weight percent n-heptane.

14. The method of claim 1 wherein said heptane stream comprises a pure grade heptane.

15. The method of claim 1 wherein said heptane stream comprises at least 90 weight percent heptane, less than 1 weight percent cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane, and less than 1 weight percent methylcyclohexane.

16. The method of claim 1 further comprising drying said heptane stream prior to said contacting.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein said drying results in a moisture level in the heptane stream of no more than about 10 parts per million by weight.

18. The method of claim 1 further comprising fractionating the heptane stream after said contacting.

19. The method of claim 18 wherein said fractionating occurs at atmospheric pressure.

20. The method of claim 18 wherein said fractionating occurs at sub-atmospheric pressure.

21. The method of claim 18 wherein said fractionating occurs at super-atmospheric pressure.

22. The method of claim 21 wherein said fractionating occurs between 5 and 100 psig.

23. The method of claim 18 wherein said fractionating yields a heptane stream comprising at least about 99.75 weight percent n-heptane.

24. The method of claim 1 wherein said acidic catalyst comprises a compound selected from a group consisting of aluminum chloride, sulfuric acid, chlorosulfonic acid, sulfonated styrene-divinylbenzene copolymers, copolymers of perfluoroethylene with perfluorovinyl ether having attached sulfonyl acid groups, acid washed clay, “X” zeolites, “Y” zeolites, acidic “X” zeolites, acidic “Y” zeolites, LZY-84 zeolite and combinations of two or more thereof.

25. The method of claim 1 wherein said acidic catalyst comprises an LZY-84 acidic zeolite catalyst.

26. The method of claim 1 wherein said acidic catalyst comprises a Filtrol-24 acidized clay catalyst.

27. The method of claim 1 wherein said acidic catalyst comprises a liquid chlorosulfonic acid.

28. The method of claim 1 wherein said contacting occurs within a reactor.

29. The method of claim 28 wherein said reactor has a weight hourly space velocity of from about 0.1 to about 10.

30. The method of claim 28 wherein said reactor has a weight hourly space velocity of from about 1 to about 4.

31. The method of claim 28 wherein said reactor has a pressure sufficient to keep said heptane stream in the liquid phase.

32. The method of claim 28 wherein said reactor has a length to diameter ratio of from about 10 to about 25.

33. The method of claim 1 wherein said contacting results in a catalyst deactivation temperature range of from about 1 degree Celsius to about 10 degrees Celsius for about 1 weight percent of coke deposition.

34. The method of claim 1 wherein the acidic catalyst is a solid acidic catalyst.

35. The method of claim 34 wherein activity of the catalyst is regenerated by drying the catalyst.

36. The method of claim 34 wherein activity of the catalyst is regenerated by burning off coke.

37. The method of claim 36 wherein conditions effective for regenerating catalyst activity comprise temperatures from about 350 to about 600 deg. Celsius; an oxygen containing gas comprising from about 0.25 to about 10 percent, by volume, oxygen; and a time from about 4 to about 10 hours.

38. The method of claim 1 wherein the contacting isomerizes the close boiling impurity.

39. The method of claim 1 wherein the contacting isomerizes cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane into methylcyclohexane, trans-1,2-dimethylcyclopentane, or both.