alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      12.1****FIRSTENERGY
      CORP.****CONSOLIDATED
      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
      CHARGES****Year
      Ended December 31,****2002**
    
    **2003**
    
    **2004**
    
    **2005**
    
    **2006****(Dollars
      in thousands)****EARNINGS
      AS DEFINED IN REGULATION S-K:**Income before
      extraordinary items
    
    $
    618,385
    
    $
    444,166
    
    $
    906,753
    
    $
    879,053
    
    $
    1,257,806Interest and
      other charges, before reduction for amounts capitalized
    
    
    980,344
    
    
    841,099
    
    
    692,068
    
    
    675,424
    
    
    727,956Provision for
      income taxes
    
    
    514,134
    
    
    407,633
    
    
    680,524
    
    
    748,794
    
    
    794,595Interest
      element of rentals charged to income (a)
    
    
    246,416
    
    
    247,222
    
    
    248,499
    
    
    241,460
    
    
    226,168Earnings as
      defined
    
    $
    2,359,279
    
    $
    1,940,120
    
    $
    2,527,844
    
    $
    2,544,731
    
    $
    3,006,525**FIXED
      CHARGES AS DEFINED IN REGULATION S-K:**Interest
      expense
    
    $
    904,697
    
    $
    798,730
    
    $
    670,655
    
    $
    659,886
    
    $
    721,068Subsidiaries’
      preferred stock dividend requirements
    
    
    75,647
    
    
    42,369
    
    
    21,413
    
    
    15,538
    
    
    6,888Adjustments to
      subsidiaries’ preferred stock dividendsto state on a
      pre-income tax basis
    
    
    28,426
    
    
    21,515
    
    
    16,071
    
    
    13,236
    
    
    4,351Interest
      element of rentals charged to income (a)
    
    
    246,416
    
    
    247,222
    
    
    248,499
    
    
    241,460
    
    
    226,168Fixed charges
      as defined
    
    $
    1,255,186
    
    $
    1,109,836
    
    $
    956,638
    
    $
    930,120
    
    $
    958,475**CONSOLIDATED
      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**
    
    
    1.88
    
    
    1.75
    
    
    2.64
    
    
    2.74
    
    
    3.14(a)Includes the
      interest element of rentals where determinable plus 1/3 of rental expense
      where no readily defined interest element can be
    determined.
§ 217.3 Application. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this part applies to railroads that operate trains or other rolling equipment on standard gage track which is part of the general railroad system of transportation.
( b ) This part does not apply to— ( 1 ) A railroad that operates only on track inside an installation which is not part of the general railroad system of transportation; or
( 2 ) Rapid transit operations in an urban area that are not connected with the general railroad system of transportation.
[40 FR 2690, Jan. 15, 1975, as amended at 54 FR 33229, Aug. 14, 1989]
§ 238.419 Truck-to-car-body and truck component attachment. ( a ) The ultimate strength of the truck-to-car-body attachment for each unit in a train shall be sufficient to resist without failure the following individually applied loads: a vertical force equivalent to 2g acting on the mass of the truck; and a force of 250,000 pounds acting in any horizontal direction on the truck, along with the resulting vertical reaction to this load.
( b ) Each component of a truck (which include axles, wheels, bearings, the truck-mounted brake system, suspension system components, and any other components attached to the truck by design) shall remain attached to the truck when a force equivalent to 2g acting on the mass of the component is exerted in any direction on that component.
[64 FR 25660, May 12, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 19992, Apr. 23, 2002]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6794

STEPHANIE ATCHLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA; J. E.

BOWMAN, Police Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Richard C. Erwin,

Senior District Judge. (CA-96-526-6)

Submitted: October 7, 1997 Decided: November 7, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephanie Atchley, Appellant Pro Se. Gusti Wiesenfeld Frankel,

WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, North Carolina,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Atchley v. Winston-Salem, No. CA-96-526-6 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 1997).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45864-45865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3973]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Third Meeting, Special Committee 215, Aeronautical Mobile 
Satellite (Route) Services, Next Generation Satellite Services and 
Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of RTCA 
Special Committee 215, Aeronautical Mobile Satellite (Route) Services, 
Next Generation Satellite Services and Equipment.

DATES: The meeting will be held September 6-7, 2007, at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20036-5133.

[[Page 45865]]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 212 meeting. The agenda will 
include:
     September 6:
     Opening Plenary Session (Welcome, Introductions, and 
Administrative Remarks, Secretary Selection, Agenda Overview).
     FAA Issue Table--Outstanding Actions.
     NSF-Radio Astronomy Issue.
     DO-262--Reports from Drafting Groups; Review of Drafts.
     Revised Outline of DO-262 Normative Appendix.
     Overview.
     Avionics Subsystem Definitions/Overall Requirements; 
Avionics Design and Performance.
     Antenna.
     Transceiver.
     Avionics Equipment Performance Verification.
     Aircraft Installation Design Requirements.
     Requirements Mapping.
     DO-270.
     Discussion of Requirements for Normative Appendix.
     Review of DO-270 and ICAO Validation Report Mapping.
     Inmarsat-Iridium Interference Analysis.
     September 7:
     Closing Plenary Session (Other Business, Establish Agenda, 
Date and Place of Next Meeting, Adjourn).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. Pre-registration for this meeting is not required for 
attendance but is desired and can be done through the RTCA secretariat. 
With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public may present 
oral statements at the meeting.
    Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 6, 2007.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 07-3973 Filed 8-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```
BF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0176

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

NATALIE AMANDA RICH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including September 17, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 17 2021

08/17/2021
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 10
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 10
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 10
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 10
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                       1,214,942
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,834,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                   427,001
<INVENTORY>                                    523,834
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,340,137
<PP&E>                                      28,390,686
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,142,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,870,622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,621,293
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       170,740
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,078,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,870,622
<SALES>                                     25,026,341
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,194,242
<CGS>                                        8,958,020
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,511,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,298,819
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (127,146)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (651,329)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (651,329)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (651,329)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.22)


</TABLE>
§ 269.17 Cessation of service. ( a ) If an eligible petitioner awarded a route under this part ceases to operate the service or fails to fulfill its obligations under the contract required under § 269.13, the Administrator, in collaboration with the Surface Transportation Board, shall take any necessary action consistent with title 49 of the United States Code to enforce the contract and ensure the continued provision of service, including the installment of an interim service and re-bidding the contract to operate the service.
( b ) In re-bidding the contract, the entity providing service must either be Amtrak or an eligible petitioner.
-----Original Message----- 

From: samsonjedi@yahoo.com [mailto:samsonjedi@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:38 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Leah Stavish 

PO Box 1075 

Central, SC 29630
From: Lawrence Hesse [mailto:larry@hessefinancial.net] 

Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2015 3:40 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: 1210-AB32. 

To who it may concern, the DOL proposed fiduciary changes will certainly curtail my business as I 

provide not only input into investments in mostly IRA holders but also insurance, beneficiary planning, 

social security planning, income planning, long term care plans, estate tax planning, estate distribution 

planning, income tax planning, how to get will and power of attorney planning. All this is provided and 

included in my services to my clients from which I am paid primarily 1% or less of the invested assets per 

year.

Why don’t you do something with the cost of gasoline at the pumps? The extra costs we pay compared 

to a few years ago would amount to billions in savings for our retirement if we just didn’t have to pay 

more for gas. How about food—how much would we be able to save for retirement if food didn’t cost so 

much—maybe you should look into that. How about cutting government waste and some of the jobs 

not needed? My we would save billions in taxes and could save that for our retirements!!!! 

My concern is if you place these onerous requirements on advisors, what will clients pay their CPA or 

Attorney for advice when we advisors “throw in the towel” in frustration with more regulatory stuff. 

Then watch what happens in costs to the consumers—you cannot legislate morality and the DOL needs 

to leave things alone.

Lawrence J. Hesse, President

Hesse Financial Services Inc.

6540 SW 10th

Topeka, KS 66615

Phone (785) 272-6789

Fax (785) 273-9145

Securities offered through a non-affiliated company, Cambridge Investment Research, Inc., a 

broker/dealer, Member NASD/SIPC

Investment Advisory Services offered through Cornerstone Advisors, LLC, a Registered Investment 

Advisor

The information in this email is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the 

intended addressee and have received this email in error, please reply to sender to inform them of this 

fact.

We cannot accept trade orders through email. Important letters, email, or fax messages should be 

confirmed by calling 785-272-6789. This email service may not be monitored every day or after 

normal business hours.
#### Gottlieb v. Frost.

Appellate Practice — Abstract.

A writ of error may be dismissed for a failure to comply with tbe rules of court relating to abstracts.

*Error to the County Court of Arapahoe County.*

Messrs. Ross & Deweese, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Geo. B. Campbell, for defendant in error.

*453Per Curiam.

The purported abstract of the record filed in this case by the plaintiff in error is in no sense a compliance with our rules. It contains no presentation of any part of the record to which reference is made in the assignment of errors, and utterly fails to advise us of the points relied on for the reversal of the judgment.

The writ of error will be dismissed.

*Dismissed.*
From: Steve Sawyer [mailto:steve@thesawyergroup.biz] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 10:41 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Good Morning, I would like to comment on the proposed fiduciary rule. First off I feel 

compelled to disclosed that I’m a licensed insurance agent, a registered rep with a broker 

dealer and an IAR.

I fully support the proposed rule. I would however like to see exceptions and allowances 

made for vendor supported call centers. They provide a valuable service to many folks that 

quite frankly aren’t being serviced by those of us in the retail space. They offer education and 

transaction assistance.

I would like to see the proposed rule deal with I think is excessive contingent compensation 

arrangement offered to registered reps employed by proprietary broker dealers. It would 

seem to me that applying the best interest standard (Fiduciary Status) would be virtually 

impossible when the RR gets additional compensation, benefits and awards for selling their 

“own products” also all of their education comes from that proprietary B/D. In addition that 

additional comp comes at a price (fees) that is usually are born by all investors. It’s not a 

conflict that simply can be disclosed away. Those payments whether in the retail space or the 

ERISA space should be barred.

Thank you for this forum to comment. 

Steve Sawyer 

Investment Advisor Representative

Accredited Investment Fiduciary

651 797 4336

www.thesawyergroup.biz

Securities and Advisory Services offered, in states where licensed, exclusively through KMS Financial 

Services, Inc. Member FINRA/SIPC. KMS Financial Financial Services Inc. and The Sawyer Group LLC are 

not affiliated companies. This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain 

legally privileged and/or confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If the 

reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, 

dissemination, distribution, copying, forwarding or other use of this message or its attachments is 

strictly prohibited. If you have received in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this 

message and all copies and backups thereof.
§ 230.100 Defects in tender truck axles and journals. ( a ) *Tender truck axle condemning defects.* Tender truck axles with any of the following defects shall be removed from service immediately and repaired: ( 1 ) Axles that are bent;
( 2 ) Collars that are broken, cracked, or worn to 1 ⁄ 4 inch or less in thickness;
( 3 ) Truck axles that are unsafe on account of usage, accident, or derailment;
( 4 ) A fillet in the back shoulder that is worn out; or
( 5 ) A gouge between the wheel seats that is more than 1 ⁄ 8 of an inch in depth.
( b ) *Tender truck journal condemning defects.* Tender truck journals with any of the following defects shall be removed from service immediately and repaired : ( 1 ) Cut journals that cannot be made to run cool without turning;
( 2 ) Seams in axles causing journals to run hot;
( 3 ) Overheating, as evidenced by pronounced blue black discoloration;
( 4 ) Transverse seams in journals of iron or steel axles; or
( 5 ) Journal surfaces having any of the following: ( i ) A circumferential score;
( ii ) Corrugation;
( iii ) Pitting;
( iv ) Rust;
( v ) Etching.
# BART Screening Analysis Results

SW Domain 1995 1996 2001 H8H DV ChangeH8H DV ChangeH8H DV Change P4 Production Bridger Wilderness 0.068 0.051 0.109 Fitzpatrick Wilderness 0.034 0.022 0.050 Pacificorp - Bridger Bridger Wilderness 3.1072.046 2.802 Fitzpatrick Wilderness 1.469 1.066 1.486 Pacificorp - Naughton Bridger Wilderness 3.119 4.3644.277 Fitzpatrick Wilderness 1.632 2.378 2.428 FMC - Granger Bridger Wilderness 0.266 0.704 0.495 Fitzpatrick Wilderness 0.120 0.225 0.183 FMC - Green River Bridger Wilderness 0.752 1.298 1.430 Fitzpatrick Wilderness 0.364 0.541 0.627 General Chemical Bridger Wilderness 0.746 0.977 1.356 Fitzpatrick Wilderness 0.295 0.372 0.493 OCI - Wyoming Bridger Wilderness 0.042 0.067 0.068 Fitzpatrick Wilderness 0.009 0.016 0.017



### NE Domain 2001 2002 2003 H8H DV ChangeH8H DV ChangeH8H DV Change Basin Electric - LRS Bad Lands 3.6832.7772.671 Wind Cave 3.295 3.142 3.207 Black Hills - Neil Simpson 1 Bad Lands 0.125 0.176 0.147 Wind Cave 0.163 0.136 0.268 Pacificorp - Dave Johnston Bad Lands 2.5962.008 2.361 Wind Cave 2.498 2.246 3.293 Pacificorp - Wyodak Bad Lands 0.842 1.246 1.097 Wind Cave 1.007 1.213 1.657 Sinclair - Casper Refinery Bad Lands 0.051 0.047 0.045 Wind Cave 0.045 0.045 0.062 Sinclair - Sinclair Refinery Bad Lands 0.096 0.072 0.075 Wind Cave 0.081 0.089 0.117



### SE Domain 2001 2002 2003 H8H DV ChangeH8H DV ChangeH8H DV Change Sinclair - Sinclair Refinery Rocky Mountain NP 0.049 0.088 0.085 Rawah Wilderness 0.062 0.11 0.077 Mt. Zirkel Wilderness 0.08 0.098 0.074 Dyno-Nobel Rocky Mountain NP 0.118 0.219 0.218 Rawah Wilderness 0.117 0.169 0.082 Mt. Zirkel Wilderness 0.068 0.048 0.023
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)**

**OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Paulson Capital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chester L. F. Paulson,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Chester L. F.  Paulson             |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Chester L. F. Paulson                  |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |
| Paulson Capital Corp.                  |
| November 9, 2007                       |

 

This certification ismade solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any otherpurpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Paulson Capital Corp. and will be retained by PaulsonCapital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
-----Original Message----- 

From: ariansarris@gmail.com [mailto:ariansarris@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:12 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

arian sarris 

25 Las Moradas Circle 

San Pablo, CA 94806