alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, JosephC. Christenson, certify that:

 

1)      I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of PPTVision, Inc.

 

2)      Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3)      Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4)      The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)     Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)     Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5)      The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a)     All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  September 12, 2003 |                              |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                           |                              |
|                           | /s/ Joseph C. Christenson         |   |
|                           | Joseph  C. Christenson, President |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000702402    
<NAME>                         DYCO OIL & GAS PROGRAM 1981-1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                              126,103
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                        26,866
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    152,969
<PP&E>                           41,116,630
<DEPRECIATION>                   41,064,130
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      208,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 5,114
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                          118,284
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        208,803
<SALES>                             106,080
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    108,709
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        76,197
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      32,512
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  32,512
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         32,512
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          4.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0
        
 

</TABLE>
119 STAT. 460 PUBLIC LAW 109–51—AUG. 2, 2005

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 775:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

June 29, considered and passed Senate.

July 25, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 109–51

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 123 W.

7th Street in Holdenville, Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Boone Pickens Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BOONE PICKENS POST OFFICE.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 123 W. 7th Street in Holdenville, Oklahoma,

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Boone Pickens Post Office’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Boone Pickens Post Office’’.

Approved August 2, 2005.

Aug. 2, 2005

[S. 775]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1836 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 378
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1836

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 24, 1996

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire property in the 
 town of East Hampton, Suffolk County, New York, for inclusion in the 
                  Amagansett National Wildlife Refuge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY FOR INCLUSION IN THE 
              AMAGANSETT NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

    (a) Authority to Acquire Property.--The Secretary of the Interior 
may acquire, for inclusion in the Amagansett National Wildlife Refuge, 
the area known as the Shadmoor Parcel, consisting of approximately 98 
acres (as determined by the Secretary) located along the Atlantic Ocean 
adjacent to municipal park land in the town of East Hampton, Suffolk 
County, New York.
    (b) Management of Acquired Interests.--Lands and interests acquired 
by the United States under this section shall be managed by the 
Secretary of the Interior as part of the Amagansett National Wildlife 
Refuge.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 23, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 378

104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1836

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire property in the 
 town of East Hampton, Suffolk County, New York, for inclusion in the 
                  Amagansett National Wildlife Refuge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 24, 1996

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002In connection with the Quarterly Report of Max & Erma’s Restaurants, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending February 18, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William C. Niegsch, Jr., the Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.      /s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr.   William C. Niegsch, Jr.  Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer     March 28, 2007  This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed“filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report,irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
25
§ 225.31 Investigations. ( a ) It is the policy of the FRA to investigate rail transportation accidents/incidents which result in the death of a railroad employee or the injury of five or more persons. Other accidents/incidents are investigated when it appears that an investigation would substantially serve to promote railroad safety.
( b ) FRA representatives are authorized to investigate accidents/incidents and have been issued credentials authorizing them to inspect railroad records and properties. They are authorized to obtain all relevant information concerning accidents/incidents under investigation, to make inquiries of persons having knowledge of the facts, conduct interviews and inquiries, and attend as an observer, hearings conducted by railroads. When necessary to carry out an investigation, the FRA may authorize the issuance of subpoenas to require the production of records and the giving of testimony.
( c ) Whenever necessary, the FRA will schedule a public hearing before an authorized hearing officer, in which event testimony will be taken under oath, a record made, and opportunity provided to question witnesses.
( d ) When necessary in the conduct of an investigation, the Federal Railroad Administrator may require autopsies and other tests of the remains of railroad employees who die as a result of an accident/incident.
( e ) Information obtained through FRA accident investigations may be published in public reports or used for other purposes FRA deems to be appropriate.
( f ) Section 20903 of title 49 of the United States Code provides that no part of a report of an accident investigation under section 20902 of title 49 of the United States Code may be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in the accident investigation report.
[39 FR 43224, Dec. 11, 1974, as amended at 61 FR 30971, June 18, 1996]
#### Charles B. Walter, *Plaintiff, v.*Oliver W. Barnes and another, *Defendants.*

Exceptions .overruled and order granting nonsuit affirmed and judgment ordered thereon, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Pratt, J., not sitting.
From: Victor Simon [mailto:vic@victorsimon.com] 

Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 11:34 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: “RIN 1210-AB32”

To Department of Labor:

RE: “RIN 1210-AB32”

To who it may concern;

Please accept this correspondence in relation to Regulation Identifier Number: 1210-AB32 which 

addresses the matter of Fiduciary Rule proposal. I have long been a supporter of advisors 

performing as a fiduciary to their clients during my near 30+ year career. Our firm has done such 

long before this became a popular concern, as it is simply the right thing to do. Now that we have 

finally gotten this matter to a point where real and valuable change can occur, I think it is critically 

important to do it right. Government agencies need to act more like businesses from the perspective 

of their decision making process, by giving the proper amount of time to fully vet ideas and policy 

etc. While I recognize there needs to be some fashion of time constraints to such, neither politics 

nor agency policy should be a roadblock or hindrance to an active process that includes a sincere 

industry desire to form the most beneficial regulations. Therefore I respectfully request that the DOL 

extend the “Comment Period” to 120 Days in order to provide that:

• Sufficient time is truly provided to analyze how the details rule will impact clients, advisors, 

and advisory business practices and the associated costs, especially within the IRA sphere.

• Ensure that the DOL is getting thoughtful commentary, which may also uncover some 

outside the box thinking to help the evolution of the industry and effects on the public 

financial welfare. 

• Because of the length and complexity of the proposal, neither of the above objectives can 

be adequately accomplished within the 90-day comment period that is currently attached to 

the proposal.

In His Service,

Victor Simon, CWS ChFC RFC AIF 

Vic@VictorSimon.com

www.LifeTimeWealthCare.com (Pending) 

PH: 410-518-6823 Fx: 410-518-6822

900 Ritchie Hwy, #201

Severna Park, MD 21146

Securities offered through First Allied Securities, Inc., a Registered Broker/Dealer, 

Member FINRA/SIPC. Advisory Services offered through First Allied Advisory 

Services, Inc., a Registered Investment Advisor.

Important: Electronic mail sent through the Internet is not secure. We recommend that you do not send confidential 

information to us via electronic mail, including social security numbers, and personal identification 
numbers. Delivery, and timely delivery, of electronic mail is not assured. We, therefore, strongly recommend that 

you do not send to us time-sensitive or action-oriented messages via electronic mail, including authorization to 

“buy” or “sell” a security or instructions to conduct any other financial transaction. However, if you choose to do 

so, we will confirm receipt before your order is considered accepted. If you do not receive this confirmation, please 

contact our office by telephone to place your order.
JESSIE DUANE QUEEN

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FI LED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 1551

Opinion filed May 3, 2017.

Petition for Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

-- Original

Jurisdiction

.

Jessie Duane Queen, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

WETHERELL, OSTERHAUS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determ ined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 2, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-30727 Summary Calendar

JULIAN SCOTT ESPARZA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus C.J. VALLUZO; MCDONALD’S CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (USDC No. 3:05-CV-259)

_________________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Julian Scott Esparza appeals the dismissal of his in forma pauperis (IFP) action against his employer, the McDonald’s Corporation, and several individuals as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) for frivolity and for failure to state a claim, respectively. Reviewing the dismissal as frivolous for an abuse of discretion andthe dismissal for failure to state a claim de novo, Geiger v. Jowers , 404 F.3d 371, 373

(5th Cir. 2005), we affirm for the following reasons:
1. Esparza’s hand-written complaint, much like his briefing to this court, borders on unintelligible. The magistrate judge properly conducted a hearing to permit Esparza to explain his allegations pursuant to Spears v. McCotter , 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985). Esparza’s explanation revealed that he was not happy with the limited number of shift hours he was scheduled to work as a hamburger cook, but that he had no evidence of any guarantee of a certain number of work hours nor of any discrimination against him on the part of McDonald’s or his supervisors.
2. We agree with the magistrate that Esparza’s pleadings in this action and explanation at the Spears hearing collectively fail to show that his IFP action has an arguable basis in law or fact. Geiger , 404 F.3d at 373.
AFFIRMED.
#### § 230.53 Time of cleaning.

The spindles of all water glass valves and of all gauge cocks shall be removed and valves and cocks thoroughly cleaned of scale and sediment at every 31 service day inspection, and when testing indicates that the apparatus may be malfunctioning. In addition, the top and bottom passages of the water column shall be cleaned and inspected at each annual inspection.
#### Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. Bondurant.

(Decided October 17, 1919.)

Appeal from Fulton Circuit Court.

Appeal and Error — Former Appeal — Judgment in Obedience to Mandate. — Where upon a second appeal no question of either fact or law not decided upon the first appeal is presented and the judgment appealed from was rendered in obedience to the (mandate of the Court of Appeals, the judgment must be affirmed. (See Bondurant v. Dahnke-Walker Milling Co., 179 Ky. 774.)

W. J. WEBB, and B. T. DAVIS for appellee.

ROBBINS & ROBBINS for appellant.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming.

This is an action by the Dahnke-Walker Milling Company against C. T. Bondurant to recover damages for a breach of contract. Upon a former appeal of the case a judgment in favor of the plaintiff was reversed upon the ground that the contract was unenforcible by the plaintiff, a foreign corporation, because of its failure to comply witb section 571 of Kentucky Statutes; and tbe cause was remanded for a new trial with directions to direct a verdict for defendant if the evidence should be *387the same as on the first trial. See Bondurant v. DahnkeWalker Milling Co., 179 Ky. 774.

The evidence being the same upon the second trial as upon the first, the trial court in obedience to the mandate of this court directed a verdict for the defendant and dismissed the petition, from which judgment the plaintiff has prosecuted this appeal.

Since no question .of either fact or law, not decided by our former opinion in this ease, is presented by this appeal, and the judgment now appealed from was rendered in obedience to our mandate and in conformity with our view of the law, as fully set forth in that opinion, reported in 179 Ky. 774, and to which we adhere, it is obvious that the judgment must he and it is affirmed.
-----Original Message----- 

From: vze2hqfb@myfairpoint.net [mailto:vze2hqfb@myfairpoint.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 7:32 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Donald MacKechnie 

45 Foothills Dr 

Jericho, VT 05465
#### § 229.41 Protection against personal injury.

Fan openings, exposed gears and pinions, exposed moving parts of mechanisms, pipes carrying hot gases and high-voltage equipment, switches, circuit breakers, contactors, relays, grid resistors, and fuses shall be in non-hazardous locations or equipped with guards to prevent personal injury.
§ 232.714 Inbound brake equipment inspection. ( a ) At points where inspectors are employed to make a general inspection of trains upon arrival at terminals, visual inspection must be made of retaining valves and retaining valve pipes, release valves and rods, brake rigging, safety supports, hand brakes, hose and position of angle cocks and make necessary repairs or mark for repair tracks any cars to which yard repairs cannot be promptly made.
( b ) Freight trains arriving at terminals where facilities are available and at which special instructions provide for immediate brake inspection and repairs, trains shall be left with air brakes applied by a service brake pipe reduction of 20 pounds so that inspectors can obtain a proper check of the piston travel. Trainmen will not close any angle cock or cut the locomotive off until the 20-pound service reduction has been made. Inspection of the brakes and needed repairs should be made as soon thereafter as practicable.