alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0631 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Dr. Steven Rondeau 

Address: 

Draper, 84020 

Email: frenchman111@hotmail.com 

General Comment 

CommentsFor the Comment box text entry: 

I am very supportive of most of the provisions of the interim final rules under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008. These rules address many of 

the inequities in health insurance coverage of mental health care when compared to medical/surgical 

care that I have observed in the course of my mental health practice. 

However, in my opinion, two areas have not been sufficiently clarified. I am quite concerned that 

unless these points are more clearly specified in the final regulations, loopholes will remain that will 

permit widespread violation of the legislative intent of the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental 

Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008: 

1. In my opinion, the interim final rules do not define clearly enough the rules regulating the 

comprehensive scope of services parity between mental health/substance abuse services and 

medical/surgical services. Given the language of the Act and the positions already taken by the 

Departments in the interim final regulations, I request that the Final Rules clarify that benefits for 

MH/SUD must be comparable in scope to the benefits provided in medical/surgical care both across 

and within each classification. Unless parity in scope of services is required in the final regulations, 

the intent of the Act will not be achieved. 

2. I strongly support the application of parity requirements to both QTLs and NQTLs as being 

consistent with the Act and allowing for broad application of the parity requirement with regard to 

treatment limitations. However, in order to implement the intent of the Act, the regulations must 

specify more clearly that any NQTLs that are applied by plans must be comparable for MH/SUD and 

medical surgical benefits, and that any NQTLs for MH/SUD must be no more restrictive than NQTLs 

that are predominant across the broad range of medical/surgical benefits.Thank you, Dr. Steven 

Rondeau 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: April 30, 2010 

Received: April 29, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ae3736 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 2

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 4/30/2010
Page 2 of 2

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 4/30/2010
-----Original Message----- 

From: mjjobbmom@buckeye-express.com [mailto:mjjobbmom@buckeyeexpress.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:52 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Mary Moldawsky 

301 Cass Street 

Maumee, OH 43537
-----Original Message----- 

From: louisenpr@yahoo.com [mailto:louisenpr@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:11 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Louise Napier 

520 Victor Street 

Saddle Brook, NJ 07663
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.489 Remedial measures: Cast iron and ductile iron pipelines. ( a ) *General graphitization.* Each segment of cast iron or ductile iron pipe on which general graphitization is found to a degree where a fracture or any leakage might result, must be replaced.
( b ) *Localized graphitization.* Each segment of cast iron or ductile iron pipe on which localized graphitization is found to a degree where any leakage might result, must be replaced or repaired, or sealed by internal sealing methods adequate to prevent or arrest any leakage.
From: Fisher, Brian To: "aaron_L_szabo@omb.eop.gov" Subject: EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_2015_1111 Preamble (redline) Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 1:32:00 PM Attachments: EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_201511-11 Preamble (redline) (00000002).docx

Hi Aaron,

This redline version reflects changes (relative to last Friday’s version) to the two topics we discussed on Monday.

Thanks,

Brian Fisher Policy Analyst Clean Air Markets Division (202) 343-9633
§ 225.35 Access to records and reports. ( a ) Each railroad subject to this part shall have at least one location, and shall identify each location, where any representative of the Federal Railroad Administration or of a State agency participating in investigative and surveillance activities under part 212 of this chapter or any other authorized representative, has centralized *access* to a copy of any record and report required under this part, for examination and photocopying in a reasonable manner during normal business hours.
( b ) Each railroad subject to this part shall also provide to any representative of the Federal Railroad Administration or of a State agency participating in investigative or and surveillance activities under part 212 of this chapter or any other authorized representative access to relevant medical and claims records for examination and photocopying in a reasonable manner during normal business hours. Such representatives shall display proper credentials when requested. Each railroad shall identify the locations where a copy of any record and report required under this part is accessible for inspection and photocopying by maintaining a list of such establishment locations at the office where the railroad's reporting officer conducts his or her official business. A copy of any record and report required under this part shall be accessible within four business hours after the request. The Form FRA F 6180.107 or the alternate railroad-designed form need not be provided at any railroad establishment within 4 hours of a request. Rather, the Form FRA F 6180.107 or the alternate railroad-designed form must be provided upon request, within five business days, and may be kept at a central location, in either paper or electronic format. FRA will not assess a monetary penalty against the railroad for its failure to provide the requested documentation when circumstances outside the railroad's control preclude it from fulfilling the four-business-hour time limit and the railroad has made a reasonable effort to correct the problem. Should a railroad assert a legal privilege with respect to certain claims and medical records, failure to provide FRA access to such records would not constitute a violation of this section. FRA retains the right to issue a subpoena to obtain such records under 49 U.S.C. §§ 20107 and 20902 and §§ 209.7(a) and 225.31(b) of this title, and the railroad may contest that subpoena.
[61 FR 30972, June 18, 1996, as amended at 61 FR 59371, Nov. 22, 1996; 68 FR 10139, Mar. 3, 2003]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsApplication of computational fluid dynamics in high speed aeropropulsionThe application is described of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to a hypersonic propulsion system. An overview of the problems associated with a propulsion system of this type is presented, highlighting the special role that CFD plays in the design of said systems.Document ID19910012145Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsPovinelli, Louis A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-103780E-6053NAS 1.15:103780Meeting InformationMeeting: IMACS World Congress on Computation and Applied MathematicsLocation: DublinCountry: United KingdomStart Date: July 22, 1991End Date: July 26, 1991Sponsors:International Federation for Information Processing,International Measurement Confederation,International Federation for Operational Research Societies,International Federation for Automatic ControlAccession Number91N21458Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-52Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910012145.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United Bancorporation
of Alabama, Inc. for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Mitchell D. Staples, principal accounting officer of the Corporation, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1). The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and(2). The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Corporation. Date:      May 14, 2004
    By:
    /s/ Mitchell D. StaplesMitchell D. Staplesprincipal accounting officer
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Superconductive Components, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer
and have:
     5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Gerald S. BlaskieGerald S. BlaskieVice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                   5
<MULTIPLIER>                1000
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                      3,583
<SECURITIES>                4,568
<RECEIVABLES>               1,488
<ALLOWANCES>                0
<INVENTORY>                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>            10,200
<PP&E>                      28,299
<DEPRECIATION>              12,486
<TOTAL-ASSETS>              26,013
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>       3,663
<BONDS>                     100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>       0
<PREFERRED>                 0
<COMMON>                    0
<OTHER-SE>                  22,250
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>26,013
<SALES>                     8,088
<TOTAL-REVENUES>            8,088
<CGS>                       3,263
<TOTAL-COSTS>               3,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>          20
<INCOME-PRETAX>             4,825
<INCOME-TAX>                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>         0
<DISCONTINUED>              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>             0
<CHANGES>                   0
<NET-INCOME>                4,825
<EPS-PRIMARY>               0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>               0.45
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PHI Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March
31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Henry D. Fahman,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Dated: May 15, 2015 |                        
|------------------- | -----------------------
|                    |                        
|By:                 | /s/ Henry D. Fahman    
|                    | Henry D. Fahman        
|                    | Chief Executive
Officer
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, 

### D. C.

Motion of AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. for confidential treatment under Rule 12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7) 

## ,,:i'ft,RTMENTOF



# ..,."SPORT' " 't.\I~ I

## ATIOI'. -.r,

## rTO:'J~RAT'O\I" ,.<.,.\C 

### ,t I,.~ 

## 1013WSIq

## P I:

## 2b

DOT-OST-1996-1203

MOTION OFAMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 Communications with respect to this document should be'sent to: VIRASB VAHIDI Senior Vice President
- Marketing and Planning and Chief Commercial Officer American Airlines, Inc. P.O. Box 619616, MD 5628 DFWAirport, Texas 75261

August 9; 2013 WILLIAM K. RIS, JR. Senior Vice President
- Government Affairs American Airlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 FRANCIS C. HEIL Senior Attorney American Airlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 496-5642 francis.heil@aa.comBEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D. C.

Motion of AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. for confidential treatment under Rule 12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7) DOT-OST-1996-1203

MOTION OFAMERICAN AIRLINES; INC. FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 American Airlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.12, hereby moves that its Form 41, Schedule B-7 for 2Q2013, be accorded confidential treatment and withheld frompublic disclosure. The information forwhich confidential treatment is requested pertains toAmerican's airframe and aircraft engine acquisitions and retirements.

Inaccordance with the Department's Final Rule on Submitting Airline Data via the Internet, 75 Fed. Reg. 41580, 41582, July 16, 2010, we are uploading our confidential report electronically tohttp://esubmit.rita.dot.gov

On June 5, 1995, by letter of James W. Mitchell, Director, Office ofAirline Statistics, the Department granted confidential treatment for a10-year period to similar data filed byAmerican. For the reasons stated in that letter, the current submission should also receive confidential treatment for 10 years.- 2
-
WHEREFORE, American moves that the schedule being submitted electronically to the above-referenced website be withheld from public disclosure under Rule 12 for aperiod of 10 years. Respectfully submitted,

Francis C. Heil Senior Attorney American Airlines, Inc. August 9, 2013
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allegiant Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shaun R. Hayes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







ALLEGIANT BANCORP, INC.



November 14, 2003                                                  By:/s/ Shaun R. Hayes
                                                                                             Shaun R. Hayes, President and
                                                                                                Chief Executive Officer
§ 238.209 Forward end structure of locomotives, including cab cars and MU locomotives. ( a ) Except as specified in § 238.201(b)— ( 1 ) The skin covering the forward-facing end of each locomotive, including a cab car and an MU locomotive, shall be: ( i ) Equivalent to a 1 ⁄ 2-inch steel plate with a yield strength of 25,000 pounds-per-square-inch—material of a higher yield strength may be used to decrease the required thickness of the material provided at least an equivalent level of strength is maintained;
( ii ) Designed to inhibit the entry of fluids into the occupied cab area of the equipment; and
( iii ) Affixed to the collision posts or other main vertical structural members of the forward end structure so as to add to the strength of the end structure.
( 2 ) As used in this paragraph (a), the term “skin” does not include forward-facing windows and doors.
( b ) The forward end structure of a cab car or an MU locomotive may comply with the requirements of appendix F to this part in lieu of the requirements of either § 238.211 (Collision posts) or § 238.213 (Corner posts), or both, provided that the end structure is designed to protect the occupied volume for its full height, from the underframe to the anti-telescoping plate (if used) or roof rails.
[75 FR 1228, Jan. 8, 2010, as amended at 83 FR 59219, Nov. 21, 2018]
March 23 , 2015

Darrell Hamm

HouseLens

720 Rundle Avenue

Nashville, TN 37210

Dear Mr. Hamm :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your J anuary 28 , 2015 exemption request on behalf of HouseLens , Inc. into the

public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0227 ) , but we are unable to process your request any further.

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed).

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific secti on or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and th e extent of

the relief you seek

.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or ar guments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9521

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
-----Original Message----- 

From: noybfl@yahoo.com [mailto:noybfl@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:01 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Michele Balfour 

124 E. Turgot Ave. 

Edgewater, FL 32132
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 29, 1995 (123), Para 123.20 Permission to File Report]
[Page 1490]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.123.20  permission to file report

  On motion of Mr. COBLE, by unanimous consent, the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure was granted permission until 5 p.m., 
Friday, October 6, 1995, to file a report on the bill (H.R. 2149) to 
reduce regulation, promote efficiencies, and encourage competition in 
the international ocean transportation system of the United States, to 
eliminate the Federal Maritime Commission, and for other purposes.
```
#### Gardiner Stewart, Respondent, *v.*Arthur L. Garford, Appellant.

*Stewart*v. *Garford,*135 App. Div. 919, affirmed.

(Argued May 2, 1911;

decided May 16, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January'3, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court in an action to recover on a promissory note.

*John W. Ingram*and *Frank E. Bradley*for appellant.

*Gilbert H. Montague*for respondent.

■ Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Application of the New York, West Shore and Buffalo Railway Company, to Acquire Title to Certain Real Estate of William H. Watson.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Hardin, J.;

Barker, J., dissenting.