alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
'LAFARGE

NORTH AMERICA

CEMENT

September 30, 2010

Mr. Robert G. Sliwinski, P,E.

Director, Bureau of Air Quality Planning

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

625 Broadway

Albany, NY 12233-3251

Re: Lafarge Ravena Plant, NYSDEC ID# 4012400001

BARTAnalysis

Dear Mr. Sliwinski:

This purpose ofthis letter is to provide a status summary ofthe Lafarge Ravena

Plant with respect to the applicability of a BART analysis for the facility. Based on

previous discussions with the Department, the Lafarge Ravena Plant submits this letter in

lieu ofthe BART analysis required by October 1,2010.

The two long wet kilns at the Ravena Plant have been operating since 1962, and

are the BART eligible units. As you may know, Lafarge entered into a Consent Decree

with EPA, Case 3: 10-cv-000440JPG-CJP, which contains a compliance schedule for the

Ravena Plant to either; modernize the existing plant, retrofit the existing kilns with NOx

and S02 controls, or retire the kilns. Additionally, Condition 92, Item 92.2 ofthe

Ravena Plant's current Title V Permit contains a similar compliance schedule. Both

Condition 92 and the Ravena-specific pages for NOx and S02 compliance from the EPA

Consent Decree are shown as attachments.

The Ravena Plant has submitted the necessary applications to the Department for

the proposed Plant Modernization Project (DEIS, Title V permit modification and SPDES

permit modification). This project will result in replacement ofthe two existing long wet

kilns with one short dry kiln and pre-heater pre-calciner tower. The target completion

date for the project is during 2014.

We agree with the Department's position that the consent decree requiring the

modernization in the near future obviates the need for a BART analysis. The

approximate timeframe for the modernization coincides with the compliance date for

BART, and it would be counterproductive to require a BART analysis in light ofthe

impending upgrades. The consent decree terms and permit condition are expected to

suffice for the BART determination to be sent to EPA.

U.s. East Business Unit

PO Box 3, Ravena, NY 12143

Office: (518)756-5026 Fax: (518)756-9333

www.lafargenorthamerica.com
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at

(518) 756-5026.

F. Reagan

vironmental Manager

Copy: S. Griffin, NYSDEC

D. Spencer, NYSDEC Region 4

B. Voshell, Lafarge

Attachments

U.s. East Business Unit

PO Box 3, Ravena, NY 12143

Office: (518) 756-5026 Fax: (518) 756-9333

www.lafargenorthamerica.com
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, June 30, 1995 (90), Para 90.17 Permission to File Report]
[Pages 1091-1092]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.90.17  permission to file report

  On motion of Mr. LEWIS of California, by unanimous consent, the 
Committee on Appropriations was granted permission until midnight 
tonight to file a privileged report (Rept. No. 104-173) on the a bill 
(H.R. 1977) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and 
related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for 
other purposes.

[[Page 1092]]

  Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XXI, all points of order were reserved.
```
#### § 236.426 Interlocking rules and instructions applicable to traffic control systems.

The rules and instructions prescribed in §§ 236.327 and 236.328, § 236.330 to § 236.334, inclusive, and § 236.342 shall apply to traffic control systems.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Michael E. Ricketson, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PAB Bankshares, Inc;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
   a.) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b.) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c.) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a.) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b.) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: November 14, 2003

By:

/s/ Michael E. RicketsonMichael E. Ricketson
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer of the registrant)
-----Original Message----- 

From: icemaster91@aol.com [mailto:icemaster91@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:34 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

charles mcCloskey 

11257 E. Maplewood Pl. 

englewood, CO 80111
0 

It) 

-e 

E 

MAINTENANCE REVIEW 

BOARD REPORT 

TEMPORA·RY REVISION No. 15-4 

IQ: HOLDERS OF PUBLICATION No. MRB-145/1150- "MAINTENANCE REVIEW BOARD REPORT", APPLICAB

AIRCRAFT. 

REASON: This Temporary Revision addresses the results of the Damage Tolerance Analysis reassessment for Skin 

Pillar. 

FILING INSTRUCTIONS: Insert this, facing on page A2-94. 

On page A2-94 : 

• ADDED new tasks 53-12-00-250-802-AOO, 53-12-00-250-802-A01 and 53-12-00-250-803-A

A2.3.4. AIRWORTHINESS LIMITATION REQUIREMENTS (AU), as described below: 

REFERENCE NUMBER 

53-12-00-210-802-AOO 

53-12-00-250-802-AOO 

MRB-145/1150 

26/Aug/13 

TYPE 

GVI 

SDE 

DESCRIPTION 

Internally inspect the FUSELAGE 

components: 

• Windshield lateral post and its 

attachment (SSI 53-10-20) 

NOTE: Applicable to aircraft Post-Mod. 

SB 145-53-0079. 

Externally inspect the FUSELAGE 

components using Eddy Current method: 

• Windshield lateral post and its 

attachment (SSI 53-10-20) 

NOTE: Applicable to aircraft Pre-Mod. 

SB 145-53-0079. 

T, ,,,._...,, ,..., ... c, /NT (Flight Cycles) 

22,060 22,060 

FC 

11,590 11,590 

FC 

----

ZONE 

223 

223 
0 

It) 

:e 

E 

REFERENCE NUMBER 

53-12-00-250-802-A01 

53-12-00-250-803-AOO 

MRB-145/1150 

26/Aug/13 

TYPE 

SDE 

SDE 

DESCRIPTION 

Externally inspect the FUSELAGE 

components using Eddy Current method: 

• Windshield lateral post and its 

attachment (SSI 53-10-20) 

NOTE: Applicable to aircraft Post-Mod. 

SB 145-53-0079. 

Internally inspect the FUSELAGE 

components using Eddy Current method: 

• Windshield lateral post and its 

attachment (SSI 53-10-20) 

NOTE: Applicable to aircraft Pre-Mod. 

SB 145-53-0079. 

MAINTENANCE REVIEW 

BOARD REPORT 

I'"',_.,, ,.,_,_ /NT (Flight Cycles) 

22,060 22,060 

FC 

11,590 11,590 

FC 

. ... -- - ----------

ZONE 

223 

223
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DERICK DURANT
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 1225

[ May 7, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Gary L. Sweet , Judge; L.T. Case No. 562016CF00683

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Timothy Wang, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez

Orosa, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN and K LINGENSMITH
, JJ., and L EVENSON
, J EFFREY R. , Associate Judge,

concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 243.113 Electronic and written program submission requirements. ( a ) Except for an employer with less than 400,000 total employee work hours annually, each employer, training organization, or learning institution to which this part applies is required to file by electronic means any program submissions required under this part in accordance with the requirements of this section. Each organization, business, or association that develops an optional model program in accordance with § 243.105 of this part is required to electronically file the program in accordance with the requirements of this section.
( b ) Prior to any person's first program submission electronically, the person shall provide the Associate Administrator with the following information in writing: ( 1 ) The name of the employer, organization, learning institution, business, or association;
( 2 ) The names of two individuals, including job titles, who will be the person's points of contact and will be the only individuals allowed access to FRA's secure document submission site;
( 3 ) The mailing addresses for the person's points of contact;
( 4 ) The person's system or main headquarters address located in the United States;
( 5 ) The email addresses for the person's points of contact; and
( 6 ) The daytime telephone numbers for the person's points of contact.
( c ) A person that electronically submits an initial program, informational filing, or new portions or revisions to an approved program required by this part shall be considered to have provided its consent to receive approval or disapproval notices from FRA by email.
( d ) A request for FRA review of written materials shall be addressed to the Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety/Chief Safety Officer, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
( e ) FRA may electronically store any materials required by this part regardless of whether the person that submits the materials does so by delivering the written materials to the Associate Administrator and opts not to submit the materials electronically.
( f ) A person that opts not to submit the materials required by this part electronically, but provides one or more email addresses in its submission, shall be considered to have provided consent to receive approval or disapproval notices from FRA by email or mail.
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.207 Transportation of pipe. ( a ) *Railroad.* In a pipeline operated at a hoop stress of 20 percent or more of SMYS, an operator may not use pipe having an outer diameter to wall thickness ratio of 70 to 1, or more, that is transported by railroad unless the transportation is performed in accordance with API RP 5L1 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3).
( b ) *Ship or barge.* In a pipeline operated at a hoop stress of 20 percent or more of SMYS, an operator may not use pipe having an outer diameter to wall thickness ratio of 70 to 1, or more, that is transported by ship or barge on both inland and marine waterways, unless the transportation is performed in accordance with API RP 5LW (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3).
( c ) *Truck.* In a pipeline to be operated at a hoop stress of 20 percent or more of SMYS, an operator may not use pipe having an outer diameter to wall thickness ratio of 70 to 1, or more, that is transported by truck unless the transportation is performed in accordance with API RP 5LT (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3).
[Amdt. 195-94, 75 FR 48606, Aug. 11, 2010, as amended by Amdt. 195-99, 80 FR 186, Jan. 5, 2015]
§ 230.98 Driving, trailing, and engine truck axles. ( a ) *Condemning defects.* Driving, trailing, and engine truck axles with any of the following defects shall be removed from service immediately and repaired (see appendix A of this part for inspection requirements): ( 1 ) Bent axle;
( 2 ) Cut journals that cannot be made to run cool without turning;
( 3 ) Transverse seams in iron or steel axles;
( 4 ) Seams in axles causing journals to run hot;
( 5 ) Axles that are unsafe on account of usage, accident or derailment;
( 6 ) Any axle worn 1 ⁄ 2 inch or more in diameter below the original/new journal diameter, except as provided in paragraph (a)(7) of this section;
( 7 ) Any driving axles other than main driving axles with an original or new diameter greater than 6 inches that are worn 3 ⁄ 4 inch or more in diameter below the original/new diameter.
( b ) *Journal diameter stamped.* For steam locomotives with plain bearings, the original/new journal diameter shall be stamped on one end of the axle no later than January 18, 2005.
§ 227.3 Application. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, subpart B of this part applies to all railroads and contractors to railroads.
( b ) Subpart B of this part does not apply to— ( 1 ) A railroad that operates only on track inside an installation that is not part of the general railroad system of transportation;
( 2 ) A rapid transit operation in an urban area that is not connected to the general railroad system of transportation;
( 3 ) A rapid transit operation in an urban area that is connected to the general system and operates under a shared use waiver;
( 4 ) A railroad that operates tourist, scenic, historic, or excursion operations, whether on or off the general railroad system of transportation; or
( 5 ) Foreign railroad operations that meet the following conditions: Employees of the foreign railroad have a primary reporting point outside of the U.S. but are operating trains or conducting switching operations in the U.S.; and the government of that foreign railroad has implemented requirements for hearing conservation for railroad employees; the foreign railroad undertakes to comply with those requirements while operating within the U.S.; and FRA's Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety/Chief Safety Officer determines that the foreign requirements are consistent with the purpose and scope of subpart B of this part. A “foreign railroad” refers to a railroad that is incorporated in a place outside the U.S. and is operated out of a foreign country but operates for some distance in the U.S.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, subpart C of this part applies to any railroad that operates a freight train that transports a PIH material, including a residue of such a PIH material, on standard gage track that is part of the general railroad system of transportation.
( d ) Subpart C of this part does not apply to a railroad that operates only on track inside an installation that is not part of the general railroad system of transportation.
[71 FR 63123, Oct. 27, 2006, as amended at 89 FR 5131, Jan. 26, 2024]
#### § 236.532 Strap iron inductor; use restricted.

No railroad shall use strap iron inductor or other roadway element with characteristics differing from its standard type on track where speed higher than restricted speed is permitted.

[49 FR 3386, Jan. 26, 1984]
#### The First National Bank of Ithaca *v.*Joseph McGraw, *Appellant,*and Ezra Cornell, Respondent.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements; and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J. ;•

Boardman, J., not acting.
From: Janson, David.C [mailto:David.C.Janson@mwarep.org] 

Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 5:22 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

I wish to oppose the proposed rule.

The rule as proposed looks complicated, confusing, and expensive to implement. I feel it would limit the 

public investors access to vital professional and educational advice.

I believe in professionalism and in the Free Market system. There are already to many rules and 

regulations to choke a horse! You CAN’T legislate morality! This ruling would end up not providing the 

necessary guidance that the investing public so needs, only an expensive stumbling block. I’m all for 

more financial education at all levels due to the complexity of products and services and for people to 

seek out qualified and trusted financial advisors...but let’s not make it harder on the investor—who will 

end up paying for that too.

I am an Investment Advisor Representative

Thank You for your consideration,

David Janson CLU, ChFC, LUTCF, FIC

Modern Woodmen Email Disclaimer: This communication and any files transmitted with it are 

confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 

addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 

copying, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 

strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify 

the sender by email or telephone and delete this communication from your system.
#### Sylvia A. White, *Respondent, v.*William Law, *Executor, etc., Appellant.*

— -Judgment reversed and new trial granted at circuit, costs to abide event. Order of reference vacated. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
**EXHIBIT      32**

> CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection      with the Annual Report of Champion Industries, Inc. (the “Company”)      on Form 10-K for the period ending October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),       we,  Marshall T. Reynolds, Todd R. Fry and Kirby J. Taylor, Chief Executive      Officer, Chief Financial Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer,      respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,      as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that      to our knowledge:

        - The Report fully          complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities          Exchange Act of 1934, and

    -  The        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

By:         /s/Marshall T. Reynolds                                              

 

By:       /s/ Todd R. Fry                                                              

 

By:       /s/ Kirby J. Taylor                                                              

A signed      copy of this written statement required by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley      Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff      upon request

Date:       January 17, 2005
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 24, 2012

t0917

Order 

September 24, 2012

145137

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145137

COA: 308049

Genesee CC: 07-020850-FC

DARTON CLIFFORD REESE, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2012 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
§ 214.309 On-track safety manual. ( a ) The applicable on-track safety manual (as defined by § 214.7) shall be readily available to all roadway workers. Each roadway worker in charge responsible for the on-track safety of others, and each lone worker, shall be provided with and shall maintain a copy of the on-track safety manual.
( b ) When it is impracticable for the on-track safety manual to be readily available to a lone worker, the employer shall establish provisions for such worker to have alternative access to the information in the manual.
( c ) Changes to the on-track safety manual may be temporarily published in bulletins or notices. Such publications shall be retained along with the on-track safety manual until fully incorporated into the manual.
[81 FR 37885, June 10, 2016]
Process description

Confidential Business Information
§ 214.339 Audible warning from trains. ( a ) Each railroad shall have in effect and comply with written procedures that prescribe effective requirements for audible warning by horn and/or bell for trains and locomotives approaching any roadway workers or roadway maintenance machines that are either on the track on which the movement is occurring, or about the track if the roadway workers or roadway maintenance machines are at risk of fouling the track. At a minimum, such written procedures shall address: ( 1 ) Initial horn warning;
( 2 ) Subsequent warning(s); and
( 3 ) Alternative warnings in areas where sounding the horn adversely affects roadway workers (*e.g.,* in tunnels and terminals).
( b ) Such audible warning shall not substitute for on-track safety procedures prescribed in this part.
[81 FR 37889, June 10, 2016]