alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 17, 1995 (129), Para 129.38 Memorials]
[Page 1534]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.129.38  memorials

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, memorials were presented and referred as 
follows:

       165. By the SPEAKER: Memorial of the Legislature of the 
     State of California, relative to homebased business; to the 
     Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities.
       166. Also, memorial of the Legislature of the State of 
     California, relative to Domestic Violence Awareness Month; to 
     the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities.
       167. Also, memorial of the Legislature of the State of 
     California, relative to air pollution; to the Committee on 
     Commerce.
       168. Also, memorial of the Legislature of the State of 
     California, relative to the Federal Clean Air Act; to the 
     Committee on Commerce.
       169. Also, memorial of the Legislature of the State of 
     California, relative to a nonmotorized facility in the Tahoe 
     Basin; to the Committee on Resources.
       170. Also, memorial of the Legislature of the State of 
     California, relative to Yosemite National Park; to the 
     Committee on Resources.
       171. Also, memorial of the Legislature of the State of 
     California, relative to immigration; to the Committee on the 
     Judiciary.
       172. Also, memorial of the Legislature of the State of 
     California, relative to airline ticket commission levels; to 
     the Committee on the Judiciary.
       173. Also, memorial of the Legislature of the State of 
     California, relative to the Federal role in transportation; 
     to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
       174. Also, memorial of the Legislature of the State of 
     California, relative to Korean war veterans; to the Committee 
     on Veterans' Affairs.
       175. Also, memorial of the Legislature of the State of 
     California, relative to commemorating the 50th anniversary of 
     Victory Over Japan Day; to the Committee on Veterans' 
     Affairs.
```
# United States **Court of Appeals** 

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

May 31 , 2019

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 201 8

- 1105

TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL,

INC.,

Appellant

v.

IBG LLC, INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC,

Appellees

UNITED STATES,

Intervenor

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -



### Appeal No. 2018

- 1302

TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL,

INC.,

Appellant

v.

IBG LLC, INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC,

AppelleesTRADING TECHNOLOGIES INT ' L v. IBG LLC 2



### UNITED STATES,

Intervenor

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -



### Appeal No. 2018

- 1438

TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL,

INC.,

Appellant

v.

IBG LLC, INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC,

Appellees

UNITED STATES,

Intervenor

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -



### Appeal No. 2018

- 1443

TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL,

INC.,

Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, ANDRE I IANCU, UNDER

SECRETARY OF COMMERC E FOR

INTELLECTUAL PROPERT Y AND DIRECTOR OF

THE UNITED STATES PA TENT AND TRADEMARK

OFFICE,

IntervenorsTRADING TECHNOLOGIES INT ' L v. IBG LLC 3



### Decided: May 21 , 2019

Nonp recedential Opinion

______________________

Please make the following changes:

Page 4, Line 9 , add

-- W ILLIAM 

### L A 

### M ARCA



### , -- after “ T HOMAS



### W. K RAUSE 

### ”

.
#### § 218.4 Preemptive effect.

Normal State negligence standards apply where there is no Federal action covering the subject matter. Under 49 U.S.C. 20106 (section 20106), issuance of the regulations in this part preempts any State law, regulation, or order covering the same subject matter, except an additional or more stringent law, regulation, or order that is necessary to eliminate or reduce an essentially local railroad safety or railroad security hazard; that is not incompatible with a law, regulation, or order of the United States Government; and that does not unreasonably burden interstate commerce. Section 20106 permits State tort actions arising from events or activities occurring on or after January 18, 2002, for the following: Violation of the Federal standard of care established by regulation or order issued the Secretary of Transportation (with respect to railroad safety, such as these regulations) or the Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to railroad security); a party's violation of, or failure to comply with, its own plan, rule, or standard that it created pursuant to a regulation or order issued by either of the two Secretaries; and a party's violation of a State standard that is necessary to eliminate or reduce an essentially local safety or security hazard, is not incompatible with a law, regulation, or order of the United States Government, and does not unreasonably burden interstate commerce. Nothing in section 20106 creates a Federal cause of action on behalf of an injured party or confers Federal question jurisdiction for such State law causes of action.

[73 FR 8498, Feb. 13, 2008]
#### Wilson, *Adm'r, v.*Russell *& a.*

In replevin by a mortgagee’s administrator alleging title under the mortgage against a party deriving title from the mortgagor, the mortgagor is not excluded by the provisions of Gen. Laws, c. 228, *ss.*16-19, *355from testifying that the note which the mortgage was made to secure was without consideration.

Replevin, of a piano. A referee found for the defendants. The plaintiff claimed title to the piano under a personal mortgage given December 20, 1869, by three persons to the plaintiff’s intestate to secure a note for $1,100. The defendants claimed to own the piano by purchase, December 10, 1875, from one of the mortgagors, who was then the owner subject to the mortgage. The mortgage, embracing a considerable amount of other property, was duly executed, and contained an affidavit in the form prescribed by law, subscribed and sworn to by the three mortgagors and the mortgagee. The defendants contended that the mortgage note was without consideration; and to show that the mortgagee was a borrower rather than a lender at the date of the note, they called one of the mortgagors, who testified, subject to exception, that in 1865, or it might have been in 1869, he loaned the mortgagee $200, and took his note, which was renewed, but never paid in the lifetime of the mortgagee, who died in 1874. The plaintiff did not elect to testify. Subject to the plaintiff’s exception, two of the mortgagors testified that the mortgage note was given, without consideration, for the purpose of preventing creditors of the mortgagors from attaching the mortgaged property, and that the affidavit on the mortgage was false.

*Shirley Carr,*for the plaintiff.

*E. B. S. Sanborn*and *W. D.*Hardy, for the defendants.

ClASTC, J.

There was no error of law in allowing the mortgagors to testify. They were not parties to the action, nor were they within the provisions of any of the statutes excluding the testimony of the adverse party where an administrator, or executor, or insane person is a party of record or a party in interest. G. L., *o.*228, ss. 16-19. The fact that they in effect testified that they had previously committed perjury in making a false oath to the mortgage was a matter affecting the credibility of their testimony, not its competency. G. L., *e.*228, *s.*27; *Demeritt*v. *Miles,*22 N. H. 523. The evidence of one of the mortgagors that the mortgagee was indebted to him for borrowed money about the time the $1,100 note was given, had some tendency to show that the mortgagee had not that amount of money to loan at that time. *Demeritt*v. *Miles, supra.*

*Exceptions overruled.*

Stanley and Blodgett, JJ\, did not sit: the others concurred.
#### § 272.5 General duty.

A railroad subject to this part shall adopt a written critical incident stress plan approved by the Federal Railroad Administration under § 272.103 and shall comply with that plan. Should a railroad subject to this part make a material modification to the approved plan, the railroad shall adopt the modified plan approved by the Federal Railroad Administration under § 272.103 and shall comply with that plan, as revised.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 11:53 AM

Received: July 14, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jz1-jz1v

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2233

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Candace Cooper

General Comment

I and fellow Americans are capable of making our own decisions on investments. The 

government doesn't need to micro-manage us. Candace Cooper
**Exhibit No. 32.2**

 

 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PHI Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the  period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Henry D. Fahman, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ Henry Fahman

Henry Fahman

Acting CFO

February 22, 2011

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 21


FIRSTENERGY CORP.

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
AT DECEMBER 31, 1999


Ohio Edison Company - Incorporated in Ohio

The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company - Incorporated in
Ohio

The Toledo Edison Company - Incorporated in Ohio

Centerior Service Company - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Properties Company - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Ventures Corporation - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Trading Services, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware

FirstEnergy Facilities Services Group, Inc. - Incorporated in
Ohio

FirstEnergy Securities Transfer Company - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Services Corp. - Incorporated in Ohio

MARBEL Energy Corporation - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Holdings, LLC - Incorporated in Ohio

FE Acquisition Corp. - Incorporated in Ohio

American Transmission Systems, Inc. - Incorporated in Ohio


                    Statement of Differences
                    ------------------------

Exhibit Number 21, List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant at
December 31, 1999, is not included in the printed document.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 28, 1995 (88), Para 88.47 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1064]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.88.47  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the motion of Mr. CALLAHAN that the Committee do now rise.

It was decided in the

Yeas

238

affirmative

Nays

171
```
Slide1 of15Model FullNameRAIDARRiskAssessmentIDentification AndRanking Yes Yes Yes YesUSEtoxTMUNEP‐SETACToxicityModel Yes Yes Yes YesEFAST2ExposureandFateAssessmentScreeningToolv2.0AlmostYes YesGExFRAME/ScibinGeneralizedExposureFramework Yes YesPRoTEGEPrioritization/RankingofToxicExposureswithGISExtensionYes Yes3MRAMultimedia,Multipathway,andMultireceptor ExposureandRiskAssessment Yes Yes YesAPEXAirPollutantsExposureModelYes YesChemSTEERChemicalScreeningToolForExposures&EnvironmentalReleasesYes YesDEEMTMDietaryExposureEvaluationModelYes YesEMSOFTExposureModelforSoil‐OrganicFateandTransport Yes YesFIRSTFQPAIndexReservoirScreeningToolHAPEMHazardousAirPollutantExposureModelYes YesHEMHumanExposureModelYesLifeLineTMModelTheLifelineGroupLifeLineTMModelYes YesMCCEMMulti‐ChamberConcentrationAndExposureModelAlmostYes YesPIRATPesticideInertRiskAssessmentToolYesPRZMandEXAMSPesticideRootZoneModelandExposureAnalysisModelingSystemAlmost YesReachScanReachScanYesSHEDSStochasticHumanExposureandDoseSimulation Yes Yes YesSOFEAandFEMSSoilFumigantExposureAssessmentandFumigantExposureModelingSystemYesSOPsStandardOperatingProceduresforResidentialPesticideExposureAssessment YesSRDSourceRankingDatabaseYes Yes YesSTIRScreeningToolforInhalationRisk Yes YesSWIMODELSwimmerExposureAssessmentModelYes YesTRIM.FaTETotalRiskIntegratedMethodologyYes YesWPEMWallPaintExposureAssessmentModelYesEvaluationofModelsagainstKeyCriteria
#### § 29.530 Is it necessary for a compact or funding agreement to include any terms about FTCA coverage?

Terms about FTCA coverage are optional in a compact or funding agreement, and the FTCA applies even if terms regarding FTCA are not included in a compact or funding agreement.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 28, 2014

d0421

Order 

Clerk

April 28, 2014

148285

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148285

COA: 316280

Wayne CC: 07-010617-FC

JOSEPH MICHAEL GREEN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
§ 214.347 Training and qualification for lone workers. Each lone worker shall be trained and qualified by the employer to establish on-track safety in accordance with the requirements of this section, and must be authorized to do so by the railroad that conducts train operations on those tracks. ( a ) The training and qualification for lone workers shall include, as a minimum, consideration of the following factors: ( 1 ) Detection of approaching trains and prompt movement to a place of safety upon their approach.
( 2 ) Determination of the distance along the track at which trains must be visible in order to provide the prescribed warning time.
( 3 ) Rules and procedures prescribed by the railroad for individual train detection, establishment of working limits, and definite train location.
( 4 ) On-track safety procedures to be used in the territory on which the employee is to be qualified and permitted to work alone.
( 5 ) Alternative means to access the information in a railroad's on-track safety manual when a lone worker's duties make it impracticable for the on-track safety manual to be readily available.
( b ) Initial and periodic (as specified by § 243.201 of this chapter) qualification of a lone worker shall be evidenced by demonstrated proficiency.
[61 FR 65976, Dec. 16, 1996, as amended at 81 FR 37889, June 10, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         217,071
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  321,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    160,926
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               831,741
<PP&E>                                         688,892
<DEPRECIATION>                                (469,786)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,122,279
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,467
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,922,708
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,856,616)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,053,812
<SALES>                                        198,853
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               458,595
<CGS>                                           71,201
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  192,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               106,332
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 90,936
<INCOME-TAX>                                       125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             90,811
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    90,811
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .020
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 50700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4315]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meetings of Board of Directors Finance Committee


Times and Dates: The Finance Committee of the Legal Services 
Corporation's Board of Directors will meet at 10 a.m. Eastern Time on 
September 17, 2007.

Location: Legal Services Corporation Headquarters, 3rd Floor Conference 
Center, 333 K Street, NW., Washington, DC

Public Observation by Telephone: Members of public that wish to listen 
to the meeting live may do so by following the telephone call-in 
directions given below. You are asked to keep your telephone muted to 
eliminate background noises. Comments from the public may be solicited 
from time to time by the presiding Chairman.

Call-In Directions for Both Meetings: 
    <bullet> Call toll-free number 1-800-621-8349;
    <bullet> When prompted, enter the following numeric pass code: 
57758;
    <bullet> When connected to the call, please ``MUTE'' your telephone 
immediately. You may do so by dialing ``*6''.

Status of Meeting: Open.

Matters to be Considered: 

Agenda

    1. Approval of agenda.
    2. Presentation of the Financial Report through July 31, 2007.
    3. Consider and act on LSC's FY 2009 Appropriations Request.
    a. Staff Presentation.
    b. Presentation by the American Bar Association.
    c. Presentation by the National Legal Aid and Defender Association.
    d. Other public comments.
    4. Consider and act on other business.
    5. Consider and act on adjournment.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia D. Batie, Manager of Board 
Operations, at (202) 295-1500.

Special Needs: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify Patricia D. Batie, at (202) 295-1500.

    Dated: August 30, 2007.
Victor M. Fortuno,
Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate 
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-4315 Filed 8-30-07; 10:50 am]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-M
Order entered January 11 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01521

- CV

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY AND AETNA H EALTH INC., Appellant s

V.

KINDRED HOSPITALS LI M ITED PARTNERSHIP D/B /A KINDRED HOSPITAL
HOUSTON MEDICAL CENT ER; THC HOUSTON, INC . D/B/A KINDRED HOSP ITAL, ET AL., Appellee s

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 16

- 13831



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellants’ January 10, 2019 unopposed motion for extension of time

to file their brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief due February 5, 2019

.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
§ 272.9 Definitions. As used in this part— *Accident/incident* has the meaning assigned to that term by part 225 of this chapter.
*Administrator* means the Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration or the Administrator's delegate.
*Associate Administrator* means the Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety and Chief Safety Officer of the Federal Railroad Administration or that person's delegate.
*Class I* has the meaning assigned to that term by the regulations of the Surface Transportation Board (49 CFR part 1201; General Instructions 1-1).
*Commuter railroad* means a railroad, as described by 49 U.S.C. 20102(2), including public authorities operating passenger train service, that provides regularly-scheduled passenger service in a metropolitan or suburban area and commuter railroad service that was operated by the Consolidated Rail Corporation on January 1, 1979.
*Critical incident* means either— ( 1 ) An accident/incident reportable to FRA under part 225 of this chapter that results in a fatality, loss of limb, or a similarly serious bodily injury; or
( 2 ) A catastrophic accident/incident reportable to FRA under part 225 of this chapter that could be reasonably expected to impair a directly-involved employee's ability to perform his or her job duties safely.
*Directly-involved employee* means a railroad employee covered under § 272.7— ( 1 ) Whose actions are closely connected to the critical incident;
( 2 ) Who witnesses the critical incident in person as it occurs or who witnesses the immediate effects of the critical incident in person; or
( 3 ) Who is charged to directly intervene in, or respond to, the critical incident (excluding railroad police officers or investigators who routinely respond to and are specially trained to handle emergencies).
*FRA* means the Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590.
*Home terminal* means an employee's regular reporting point at the beginning of the tour of duty.
*Intercity passenger railroad* means a railroad, as described by 49 U.S.C. 20102(2), including public authorities operating passenger train service, which provides regularly-scheduled passenger service between large cities.