alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–257 

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 2744, AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, FOOD AND 

DRUG ADMINISTRATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS 

ACT, FY 2006 

OCTOBER 27, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. PUTNAM, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 520] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 520, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report to accompany H.R. 2744, Agriculture, Rural Development, 

Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2006, and against its consideration. The 

resolution also provides that the conference report shall be considered as read. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order is necessary because the conference report was filed with the House on Wednesday, October 26, 

2005 and it may be considered by the House as early as Friday, 

October 28, 2005, which would violate clause 8 of rule XXII (requiring a three-day layover of conference reports and the accompanying 

joint explanatory statement). 

Æ
###### Editorial Note on Part 193

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

#### §§ 193.2169-193.2171 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 149 (Friday, August 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 43250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3791]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Intent To Grant an Exclusive License of a U.S. Government-Owned 
Patent

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e) and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i), 
announcement is made of the intent to grant an exclusive, royalty-
bearing, revocable license to U.S. provisional patent application filed 
April 24, 2006 entitled ``Trauma Training Mannequin''; U.S. provisional 
patent application filed August 18, 2006 entitled ``Trauma Training 
Mannequin''; U.S. provisional patent application filed June 8, 2006 
entitled ``Trauma Training System''; U.S. patent application filed 
April 23, 2007 entitled ``Trauma Training System''; and foreign rights 
(PCT/US2005/043771) to Skedco, Inc., with its principal place of 
business at 10505 SW Manhasset Drive, Tualatin, Oregon 97062.

ADDRESSES: Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, 
ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-ZA-J, 504 Scott Street, Fort 
Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702-5012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For licensing issues, Dr. Paul Mele, 
Office of Research & Technology Assessment, (301) 619-6664. For patent 
issues, Ms. Elizabeth Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808, both at 
telefax (301) 619-5034.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of 
this license can file written objections along with supporting 
evidence, if any, 15 days from the date of this publication. Written 
objections are to be filed with the Command Judge Advocate (see 
ADDRESSES).

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-3791 Filed 8-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
#### § 236.725 Circuit, switch shunting.

A shunting circuit which is closed through contacts of a switch circuit controller.
No. 

L 

2_ 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

I t/ :', -- ---~ / ~~ 

Stgn:ii(JI•at:t-·7 Ples~s- - __ :______--

u.s. EPA Public Hearing on EPA's Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard for New 

Power Plants 

May 24, 2012, Washington, DC 

Name Affiliation I City I State E-mail I Telephone Wish to be a Speaker? 

YIN 

' ~~'\\ c u., . \)c_ s\_..,_ ~J,· J. \ ( v•·"""'-~ ·') ·C.,_; - -·, -"J ~\<' ......., v<:, u ,.., J 

-~ _) lj - tL{b'i 

U:\~ l!'t (\.;v\'V\ v~ . ~"~">b.: v ; j ·iy 'VvV', ·' .... ' ' \ -\C\;1 ~ \ ( <,; c C') 1\'\:'1•\ . L~ ;-"¥! fJ 

!~\(.:.,, ' ' . i\l 'L ~\,\ ·k d. N ·. t ' "'\< :~'--'-' ~~·~ \..J::'i~'?;& .~ i-\ 'U;:fx~l(. <).,\_1·.\el. G....([\. \'·(l\.i·'· .• ;:. ;......~.c_-.;-v v 

I~)~ Y:;/. /~ . \ VA • I 

/ '/1-~'v!'ju:, v~ i\ /" /rj: )ft:i1 / l.j {1.-; r !Jt!l"!£;/JJtt:5 Y<;_ fir; //; J .{ 

' 

-)_'1/LI'·' ( ..:.IT\ < "-\"71? 6_ <' (:~~. ... .....::..' -~ '--- < l - . L.·'C.:: /> ,_. -(_-· <-v, .. \.-- -·..- ._~,........;-_ r ~ 

l--, 

~--l ~~,L1. 'l ~-( {'\__\ 'J"' (•. J-;1:-'-c~ , \ :; '-- l~ "-" C'V\/'-"J-~ ·Gv--

7. -

. 'er~ U1h'l! 11 ')_{ ~~ -:ff'f1,~ J c,-A - r"-' ,....., 

.( CE~ 

8. 

I (' i r ~h" E ll> ~ 1._( ~ L .( l G.\ t (J:_,.), ·,~, ('I() I -\.~ ~·. ,. lA lv 

I 9. (·.:(.·,,.\, .. :' I' 

•V'/ "~ ~-- ~ j ' i r )'')'\ r "l ~~ ;·- <,·, •rr; .i''l ( , I 

I ' ,. ' l~i ' '. ·< ..;.. · .. . <7 ]\, I ' _,-!} ,- \ ~ : ' • .J ( ' l ._ •/'< ,..- , . ' . I ' ·._. ' ' ' . . ~ 

10. Jw (7 ~( ~~1 v'.;c"''~ ' '" I<S.~u-z~ (h\:, /I?C 

J v li'J bv ~~i \. (,\ v\~J\ ~ 'J'\\l :t(.\4.1,. ,. I . 11. 

(-'·, I SC; ( ( C\ L\v tPr N - . . :I I . I('( ( 11JA I" i',.( 1 l ()....{: (.. t~ l \\ i C I· \(1 ' ,· . f-'(_/\ ~-, ·: !'-/'~: \'-"~\ .. 1_:_: ·:((.··\ 

12. i)!"'· c.~ z-r y,'J'"'\ (I..J.:, I J)L y ' 1, . i, @._ c) "''"" j 

N') ., 

j_""' ,J A. A ~ie,. l.- e,.r" 1_/1'1.. 

Please Print or Write Legibly Page No. 1 

'I 
No. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 

17. 

18. 

19. 

20. 

21. 

22. 

23. 

24. 

25. 

Sign-in Sheet- ~ 

U.S. EPA Public Hearing on EPA's Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard for New 

Power Plants 

May 24, 2012, Washington, DC 

Name Affiliation I City I State E-mail I Telephone Wish to be a Speaker? 

YIN 

US~i 1..: .. 6/i-C L+- \tdiCi c ll'Li.J i lM( 10 k:.o .!- f(" ):<?, '"•Lf~h- \ ') tJ 

Jul1,.q 

hl <lie •-<J. '"' - A (" . ·\\( ·~' c d R.ct' y~l, :tf:' ;-.r~_t' 

J;;l.<• .. · d <tl< v"'-W -~.;,·,·\'t _ '':y<""" w - ...:..1<"" -~ 1'-j'\ -~-

D-<>Y~~--<f' r,f V \' '( (\ d O•f! VA, Cf'o~ §J ~fY"\ci.l/.~ r-S 

~v~ot1tf.l N~M. / t>c N 

-rt+f~-kYIJ'.~:.r 111/rf1? 

' 

IV 

~ Vlh"' '.~-! ' - ,,_;, '"" NA?VI rJ ~ Vtc:£'01. t~~d "- 1 -A vV\ rJ 

·"'vrt-; &-ree,i-1~ ~e;!.J £,ej/-- ~.:; ;qfiJ ~ C> (' Lc; A.... '/ t____...---

·-~~~,J .cJ.Q.)-\ v 

......( '· <[)'-' v 

f-wttrt:ac Cr..J~:) Q 117 "-..} 

(\ I 

0 _ 1r v {I \.V c,_f VI t)G'.r-A \t;;)c \I ~ _ro, ~ l~ ,)(_, 

- I 

v (/ ) 

Please Print or Write Legibly Page No.2 

I 

' I 

1
#### § 260.29 Third party consultants.

Applicants may utilize independent third-party consultants to prepare a financial evaluation of the proposed project and the applicant, if approved by FRA. Providing such an evaluation would greatly assist FRA in the evaluation of the application and would significantly reduce the time necessary for FRA to process the application. We encourage the use of third party consultants.
Exhibit 10.32


 


THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT TO


KAISER GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC.


SECTION 401(k) PLAN


 


WHEREAS, Kaiser Group International, Inc.
(the “Company”), maintains the Kaiser Group International, Inc. Section 401(k)
Plan (the “Plan”); and


 


WHEREAS, Section 10.2 authorizes the Board
to amend the Plan;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE,
effective January 1, 2006, the Plan is amended as follows:


Exhibit A is amended to delete the reference to Kaiser Analytical
Management Services, Inc. as an Excluded Entity.


 


Executed this 30th
day of December, 2005.


 


	
   

  	
  KAISER GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Douglas
  W. McMinn

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
    Title:
  Chief Executive Officer
#### § 236.53 Track circuit feed at grade crossing.

At grade crossing with an electric railroad where foreign current is present, the electric energy for noncoded direct current track circuit shall feed away from the crossing.
Order entered Ju ly 1 6 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 21 - 001 29 - CR No. 05 - 21 - 00130 - CR VICTORIA IFEANYI ANWUZIA , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On A ppeal from the Coun ty Court at Law No. 1

Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . CR16 - 088 6 & CR16 - 0887

O RDER Before the Court is appellant ’s Ju ly 15 , 2021 second motion for an extension

o f time to file her brief. We GRANT the motion and O R DER app ellant ’ s brief due by August 16, 2021

. Appellant is cautioned that further extensions are disfavored. / s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
§ 230.33 Welded repairs and alterations. ( a ) *Unstayed portions of the boiler containing alloy steel or carbon steel with a carbon content over 0.25 percent.* Prior to welding on unstayed portions of the boiler, the steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall submit a written request for approval to the FRA Regional Administrator. If the approval is granted, the steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall perform any welding to unstayed portions of the boiler in accordance with an accepted national standard for boiler repairs. The steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall satisfy reporting requirements in § 230.20 at this time.
( b ) *Unstayed portions of the boiler containing carbon steel not exceeding 0.25 percent carbon.* The steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall perform any welding to unstayed portions of the boiler in accordance with an accepted national standard for boiler repairs. The steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall satisfy reporting requirements in § 230.20 at this time.
( c ) *Wastage.* The steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall submit a written request for approval to the FRA Regional Administrator before performing weld build up on wasted areas of unstayed surfaces of the boiler that exceed a total of 100 square inches or the smaller of 25 percent of minimum required wall thickness or 1 ⁄ 2 inch. Wasted sheets shall not be repaired by weld build up if the wasted sheet has been reduced to less than 60 percent of the minimum required thickness as required by this part.
( d ) *Flush patches.* The steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall submit a written request for approval to the FRA Regional Administrator for the installation of flush patches of any size on unstayed portions of the boiler.
( e ) *Stayed portions of the boiler.* The steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall perform welded repairs or alterations on stayed portions of the boiler in accordance with established railroad practices, or an accepted national standard for boiler repairs. The steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall satisfy the reporting requirements in § 230.20 at this time.
#### § 237.151 Audits; general.

Each program adopted to comply with this part shall include provisions for auditing the effectiveness of the several provisions of that program, including the validity of bridge inspection reports and bridge inventory data, and the correct application of movement restrictions to railroad equipment of exceptional weight or configuration.
Exhibit 34.1





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of Ohio Edison Company:





We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying “Report on assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Asset-Backed Securities”, that Ohio Edison Company complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the asset-backed securities transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving phase-in recovery property (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended, excluding (i) the criteria which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by them with respect to the Platform and (ii) the servicing activities that are applicable to the Platform but are excluded from the scope of management’s assertion and are not reported herein, as indicated in Exhibit 33.1 of Management’s Assertion on Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities  that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.  Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.











/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





Cleveland, Ohio


March 31, 2017
From: Earl Hartley [mailto:barneyhartley@ceteraadvisors.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 4:41 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210 AB32

I am appealing to the Department of Labor to extend the comment period for RIN 1210 AB32 to 

120 days. As an Investment Advisor in my 26th year, I consider this proposal to be extremely 

important and potentially damaging to clients who have given their trust to me. It is reckless 

and inappropriate to shorten the time frame for comments and thus limit discussion on a vital 

issue such as this one.

Sincerely,

E. BARNEY HARTLEY

BRANCH MANAGER

Securities and Advisory Services offered through Cetera Advisors, member FINRA, SIPC

1000 Towncenter Blvd NE

Tacoma, WA 98422

Confidential: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the 

use of the individual or entity to whom this email is addressed. If you are not one of the named 

recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please 

notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, 

dissemination, forward, printing, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
§ 229.91 Motors and generators. A motor or a generator may not have any of the following conditions: ( a ) Be shorted or grounded.
( b ) Throw solder excessively.
( c ) Show evidence of coming apart.
( d ) Have an overheated support bearing.
( e ) Have an excessive accumulation of oil.
From: Linda Brownholtz [mailto:lab@hinamauka.org] 

Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 7:05 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: FW: Comments in response to the "Request for Information Regarding the Paul 

Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008."

 

From: Alan Johnson 

Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 10:54 AM 

To: 'E-OHPSCA.EBSA@dol.gov' 

Subject: Comments in response to the “Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008.”

Comments in response to the “Request for Information Regarding the Paul 

Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 

2008.” 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Internal Revenue Service, 26 CFR Part 54, RIN 1545-BI70, 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Employee Benefits Security Administration, 29 CFR Part 2590, RIN 1210-

AB30, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 

Services, 45 CFR Parts 144 and 146, [CMS-4140-NC] RIN 0938-AP65 

Hina Mauka, a substance abuse and co-occurring disorder treatment provider in 

Hawaii, provides the following comments and recommendations: 

• Parity should extend to all levels of care including detox, residential, inpatient, 

etc. 

• Medical necessity should be medical based such as for all other medical 

conditions. 

• Parity should extend to court-ordered treatment based on medical need. 

• Federal government should create a website or toll free number and outreach 

program to educate consumers as well as record problems accessing services. 

• Remove plan limitations based on types of facilities and kinds of clinicians. 

• Include parity for out-of-network services. 

Problems with Current System before Parity: 

• Access to residential care is too limited by insurers. 

• Detox is limited, especially for those drugs considered as having less withdrawals 

such as cocaine and methamphetamine. 
• Insurance plans limit recognition of counselors as providers unless heavily 

credentialed. 

• Insurers often deny coverage for other levels of care including continuing care. 

• Out-of-network charges can be steep, which limits access to treatment. 

• The “usual and customary rates” used by insurers are significantly lower than 

industry standards. 

• Some insurers have excessive co-pays or deductibles. 

• Insurers often hide behind verbiage such as “does not meet medical necessity 

according to our internal standards.” 

• Pre-existing clauses can limit coverage. 

Aloha, 

Alan Johnson, CEO, Hina Mauka (The Alcoholic Rehabilitation Services of Hawaii, Inc.)
#### The People of the State of New York *v.*Edward Simons.

Motion to set aside order denied.
#### § 236.380 Indication locking.

Indication locking shall be tested when placed in service and thereafter when modified, disarranged, or at least once every two years, whichever shall occur first.

[49 FR 3385, Jan. 26, 1984]
RECONSIDERATION DOCKET

95-2633.

#### State ex rel. R. Bauer & Sons Roofing & Siding, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 94APD06-865. Reported at 84 Ohio St.3d 62, 701 N.E.2d 995. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.
#### James McNulty, *Appellant, v.*John B. Solly, Respondent.—

Order affirmed ; opinion by

Brady, J.
#### § 236.796 Routes, conflicting.

Two or more routes, opposing, converging or intersecting, over which movements cannot be made simultaneously without possibility of collision.
§ 232.111 Train handling information. ( a ) A railroad shall adopt and comply with written procedures to ensure that a train crew employed by the railroad is given accurate information on the condition of the train brake system and train factors affecting brake system performance and testing when the crew takes over responsibility for the train. The information required by this paragraph may be provided to the locomotive engineer by any means determined appropriate by the railroad; however, a written or electronic record of the information shall be maintained in the cab of the controlling locomotive.
( b ) The procedures shall require that each train crew taking charge of a train be informed of: ( 1 ) The total weight and length of the train, based on the best information available to the railroad;
( 2 ) Any special weight distribution that would require special train handling procedures;
( 3 ) The number and location of cars with cut-out or otherwise inoperative brakes and the location where they will be repaired;
( 4 ) If a Class I or Class IA brake test is required prior to the next crew change point, the location at which that test shall be performed; and
( 5 ) Any train brake system problems encountered by the previous crew of the train.
#### § 196.205 Can PHMSA assess administrative civil penalties for violations?

Yes. When the Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety has reason to believe that a person has violated any provision of the 49 U.S.C. 60101 *et seq.* or any regulation or order issued thereunder, including a violation of excavation damage prevention requirements under this part and 49 U.S.C. 60114(d) in a State with an excavation damage prevention law enforcement program PHMSA has deemed inadequate under 49 CFR part 198, subpart D, PHMSA may conduct a proceeding to determine the nature and extent of the violation and to assess a civil penalty.
§ 268.21 Down-selection of one or more Maglev projects for further study and selection of one project for final design, engineering, and construction funding. ( a ) Upon completion of Phase III of the Maglev Deployment Program, FRA will down-select one or more projects to complete additional environmental studies, investment grade revenue forecasts, and other studies and analyses necessary prior to initiation of construction. Final design and engineering work will also be initiated for the down-selected project(s). To be down-selected a project must appear to meet the project eligibility standards contained in § 268.11 (b), rate highly in the project selection criteria specified in § 268.17, be judged by FRA to have a good chance of being constructed with the Federal funds authorized for this program, and be successfully operated by a public/private partnership.
( b ) Only one project will be selected in Phase IV of the Maglev Deployment Program and be eligible for any Federal construction funds that Congress chooses to make available. That one project must meet each and every project eligibility standard contained in § 268.11 (b). If more than one project down-selected in Phase III and funded through Phase IV meets all of these standards, then FRA will evaluate and compare the eligible projects according to the set of project selection criteria contained in § 268.17.
( c ) In reviewing competing projects under the project eligibility standards and project selection criteria, the FRA will exercise particular vigilance regarding the following elements of the preconstruction planning process, although not to the exclusion of others: ( 1 ) The credibility of the demand and revenue forecasts, cost estimates, and benefit/cost comparisons; and
( 2 ) The credibility of the financial plan.
( d ) FRA intends to make periodic reviews of the processes and products of grant recipients. Such reviews may include, at the FRA's option, reviews at key milestones in the preparation of project descriptions.