alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 25.110 Remedial and affirmative action and self-evaluation. ( a ) *Remedial action.* If the designated agency official finds that a recipient has discriminated against persons on the basis of sex in an education program or activity, such recipient shall take such remedial action as the designated agency official deems necessary to overcome the effects of such discrimination.
( b ) *Affirmative action.* In the absence of a finding of discrimination on the basis of sex in an education program or activity, a recipient may take affirmative action consistent with law to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation therein by persons of a particular sex. Nothing in these Title IX regulations shall be interpreted to alter any affirmative action obligations that a recipient may have under Executive Order 11246, 3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339; as amended by Executive Order 11375, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 684; as amended by Executive Order 11478, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 803; as amended by Executive Order 12086, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 230; as amended by Executive Order 12107, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 264.
( c ) *Self-evaluation.* Each recipient education institution shall, within one year of September 29, 2000: ( 1 ) Evaluate, in terms of the requirements of these Title IX regulations, its current policies and practices and the effects thereof concerning admission of students, treatment of students, and employment of both academic and non-academic personnel working in connection with the recipient's education program or activity;
( 2 ) Modify any of these policies and practices that do not or may not meet the requirements of these Title IX regulations; and
( 3 ) Take appropriate remedial steps to eliminate the effects of any discrimination that resulted or may have resulted from adherence to these policies and practices.
( d ) *Availability of self-evaluation and related materials.* Recipients shall maintain on file for at least three years following completion of the evaluation required under paragraph (c) of this section, and shall provide to the designated agency official upon request, a description of any modifications made pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section and of any remedial steps taken pursuant to paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
Editorial Note on Part 98
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 98.25-15 Markings. ( a ) Cargo tanks shall be marked in accordance with the requirements of § 54.10-20 of subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter.
( b ) In addition to the markings required to be stamped on the tank, the legend, “Anhydrous Ammonia” shall be conspicuously and legibly marked upon the dome or upper portion of the tank in letters at least 4 inches high.
( c ) All tank inlet and outlet connections, except safety relief valves, liquid level gaging devices and pressure gages shall be labeled to designate whether they terminate in the vapor or liquid space. Labels of noncorrosive material may be attached to valves.
( d ) All tank markings shall be permanently and legibly stamped in a readily visible position. If the tanks are lagged, the markings attached to the tank proper shall be duplicated on a corrosion resistant plate secured to the outside jacket of the lagging.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 17022, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18902, Dec. 18, 1968]
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0262 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Judy Crawford 

Address: 

Wheat Ridge, CO, 

Email: info@bcia.org 

Organization: BCIA 

General Comment 

I am writing to you today to request that you recognize biofeedback as a valid 

treatment option. There are many studies evaluating its effectiveness in the 

treatment of medical and/or psychological disorders. I believe that biofeedback 

quite often meets the same criteria as medication or other therapies. Many 

insurance companies and third party payers deny reimbursement and this limits 

an effective and valid intervention 

The Biofeedback Certification Institute of America (BCIA) is the certifying body for 

the practice of biofeedback, representing all modalities including neurofeedback. 

The APA pronounced biofeedback as a proficiency because of our petitioning of 

their organization. About 70% of our certificants are from the mental health field. I 

would be happy to furnish any further information you request. Please do visit 

www.bcia.org. 

Judy Crawford 

BCIA Director of Certification 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 29, 2009 

Received: May 28, 2009 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 809bcde3 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-2925

___________________________

Charles A. Winston

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Danny Burl, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit; Todd Ball, Deputy Warden of

Security, East Arkansas Regional Unit; Dexter Payne, Deputy Warden of

Operation, East Arkansas Regional Unit; Walton, Mailroom Supervisor, East

Arkansas Regional Unit; Barbara Ester, Estate of Barbara Ester, deceased, Property

Supervisor, East Arkansas Regional Unit; Lynette Dickerson, Property Supervisor,

East Arkansas Regional Unit

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena

____________

 Submitted: March 11, 2015

Filed: March 17, 2015 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SMITH, GRUENDER, BENTON Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Arkansas prisoner Charles Winston appeals the district court’s dismissal of his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging defendants wrongfully destroyed his property

and retaliated against him for filing grievances. After careful review of the record, we

affirm. Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (de novo

review of 28 U.S.C. § 1915A dismissal); Fullington v. Pfizer, Inc., 720 F.3d 739, 747

(8th Cir. 2013) (court of appeals may affirm on any basis supported by record).

The district court correctly decided that Winston failed to state a procedural due

process claim based on the destruction of his property because Arkansas provided an

adequate post-deprivation remedy. See Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 533 (1984)

(unauthorized deprivation of property does not constitute violation of procedural due

process if meaningful post-deprivation remedy is available); Willis Smith & Co., Inc.

v. Arkansas, 548 F.3d 638, 640 (8th Cir. 2008) (Arkansas provides adequate postdeprivation remedy for property claims through Arkansas State Claims Commission). 

Additionally, the statute of limitations barred any claims based on conduct that

occurred before December 30, 2010, see Miller v. Norris, 247 F.3d 736, 739 (8th Cir.

2001) (Arkansas 3-year statute of limitations for personal injuries applies to § 1983

claims), and, to the extent the complaint raised timely claims against Lynette

Dickerson based on retaliation, denial of access to the courts, or violations of prison

policies, remand is unnecessary because the allegations failed to state a claim, see

Atkinson v. Bohn, 91 F.3d 1127, 1129 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (plaintiff must

allege sufficient facts to infer retaliatory animus to state retaliation claim); Hartsfield

v. Nichols, 511 F.3d 826, 831-32 (8th Cir. 2008) (denial of access to courts claim must

be supported by showing actual injury, i.e., that non-frivolous legal claim was

frustrated or impeded); Gardner v. Howard, 109 F.3d 427, 430-31 (8th Cir. 1997)

(violating prison policy does not give rise to § 1983 claim).

Therefore, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1,000

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                        2,749
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 1,781
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     11
<INVENTORY>                                                   1,941
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              9,023
<PP&E>                                                        3,553
<DEPRECIATION>                                                2,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               11,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         1,077
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                         83
<OTHER-SE>                                                    9,751
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 11,033
<SALES>                                                       8,842
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              8,842
<CGS>                                                         4,681
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 4,681
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               (14)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 740
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    340
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             400
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  314
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    714
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0.09



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY §

LABORERS PENSION FUND, §

CENTRAL LABORERS’ PENSION §

FUND, LAWRENCE MILES, AND § No. 411, 2022

BRIAN SEAVITT, derivatively on §

behalf of SOLARWINDS §

CORPORATION, §

§ Court Below: Court of Chancery

Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, § of the State of Delaware

§

v. §

§

MIKE BINGLE, WILLIAM BOCK, § C.A. No. 2021-0940

SETH BORO, PAUL J. CORMIER, §

KENNETH Y. HAO, MICHAEL §

HOFFMAN, DENNIS HOWARD, §

CATHERINE R. KINNEY, JAMES §

LINES, EASWARAN SUNDARAM, §

KEVIN B. THOMPSON, JASON §

WHITE, MICHAEL WIDMANN, §

§

Defendants Below, Appellees, §

§

and §

§

SOLARWINDS CORPORATION, §

§

Nominal Defendant Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: April 26, 2023

Decided: May 17, 2023

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, and TRAYNOR, Justices. 

O R D E R

Now this 17th day of May 2023, the Court having considered this matter on the 

briefs and oral arguments of the parties and the record below and having concluded that 
the same should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of 

Chancery in its Memorandum Opinion dated September 6, 2022, and its Final Order and 

Judgment dated October 13, 2022;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the Court 

of Chancery be and the same hereby is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
-----Original Message----- 

From: timothy.lejeune@ssa.gov [mailto:timothy.lejeune@ssa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 8:46 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Timothy LeJeune 

1347 Londolyn Ter 

Traverse City, MI 49686
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - REGI U.S. Inc. - Exhibit 4.1





Exhibit 4.1

MODIFICATION 2

The Rand CamTM UAV Engine License agreement between
  Reg and Radian issued April 24, 2002, and modified May 14, 2004, is modified
  as follows:

1. The following is added to paragraph III (c) :

The Phase 2 Study is hereby ended. As consideration for this
  early close-out, Radian will provide the engineering work performed on the second
  prototype engine to REG without limitation. This includes study notes, drawings,
  parts lists, the preliminary patent application and the RadMaxTM
  trademark.

In exchange for this property, REG will provide an unconditional
  release to Radian for all obligations under the UAV license.

2. Paragrapoh III (e) is modified as follows:

Delete the words “this Modification 1” and substitute
  “Modification 2”

This Modification is effective as of the last date written below:

	REGI U.S., Inc. 	  
	Reg Technologies, Inc. 	  
	Rand Energy Group, Inc. 	Radian Inc. 
	  	  
	By: /s/ John Robertson 	By: /s/ Jerry Mailey 
	         John Robertson,
      President 	       Jerry Mailey, Director
      of Contracts 
	  	  
	Date: December 21, 2005 	Date: September 12, 2005
Unassociated Document


    ADDENDUM

    


    This
      Addendum (“Addendum”) to the Investment Agreement dated March 6, 2006
      (“Agreement”) is made this 17th day of March, 2006, by and between the parties
      to this Addendum, Getting Ready Corporation (“Company”) and Dutchess Private
      Equities Fund, LP ("Dutchess") pertaining to the
      Agreement.

    


    Whereas,
      the parties have agreed to remove Section 6 of the Agreement in its entirety
      and
      have reached full agreement as to the terms and conditions of such amendment.
      

    


    The
      new
      Section 6 shall read "Intentionally Omitted" 

    


    No
      other
      terms, rights or provisions of the Investment Agreement are or should be
      considered to have been modified by the terms of this Addendum and each party
      retains all other rights, obligations, privileges and duties contained in the
      Agreement..

     

    


    Agreed
      and Accepted on this 17th day of March, 2006. :

    


    


    


    By
      Dutchess:_/s/
      Douglas H. Leighton______________________________

    Douglas
      H. Leighton, Managing Director

    


    


    


    By
      Company:_/s/
      Sheldon Rose____________________________________

    Sheldon
      Rose, CEO
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Thomas L. Redding, Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Henry County Bancshares, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 8, 2006



/s/ Thomas L. ReddingThomas L. Redding, Sr. Vice President and CFO(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
§ 215.115 Defective roller bearing. ( a ) A railroad may not place or continue in service a car, if the car has— ( 1 ) A roller bearing that shows signs of having been overheated as evidenced by— ( i ) Discoloration; or
( ii ) Other telltale signs of overheating such as damage to the seal or distortion of any bearing component;
( 2 ) A roller bearing with a— ( i ) Loose or missing cap screw; or
( ii ) Broken, missing, or improperly applied cap screw lock; or
( 3 ) A roller bearing with a seal that is loose or damaged, or permits leakage of lubricant in clearly formed droplets.
( b ) ( 1 ) A railroad may not continue in service a car that has a roller bearing whose truck was involved in a derailment unless the bearing has been inspected and tested by: ( i ) Visual examination to determine whether it shows any sign of damage; and
( ii ) Spinning freely its wheel set or manually rotating the bearing to determine whether the bearing makes any unusual noise.
( 2 ) The roller bearing shall be disassembled from the axle and inspected internally if— ( i ) It shows any external sign of damage;
( ii ) It makes any unusual noise when its wheel set is spun freely or the bearing is manually rotated;
( iii ) Its truck was involved in a derailment at a speed of more than 10 miles per hour; or
( iv ) Its truck was dragged on the ground for more than 200 feet.
( 3 ) Each defective roller bearing shall be repaired or replaced before the car is placed back in service.
[44 FR 77340, Dec. 31, 1979, as amended at 45 FR 26711, Apr. 21, 1980]
#### § 236.797 Route, interlocked.

A route within interlocking limits.
§ 179.500-10 Protective housing. ( a ) Safety devices, and loading and unloading valves on tanks shall be protected from accidental damage by approved metal housing, arranged so it may be readily opened to permit inspection and adjustment of safety relief devices and valves, and securely locked in closed position. Housing shall be provided with opening having an opening equal to twice the total discharge area of pressure relief device enclosed.
( b ) [Reserved]
[29 FR 18995, Dec. 29, 1964. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967, and amended at 66 FR 45390, Aug. 28, 2001; 67 FR 61016, Sept. 27, 2002]
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 4:30 PM

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyh-wjap

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2188

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I do strongly believe I can make my own investment choices which I believe will benefit me the 

most.
#### § 196.207 What are the maximum administrative civil penalties for violations?

The maximum administrative civil penalties that may be imposed are specified in 49 U.S.C. 60122.
Things we’ve collected from the WIP collection tankSTICKS & ROCKSAquatic insectsBig FishSmall FishCollection TankSilt, Sand, SticksWIP pulled up for inspectionLevel Probe (inlet)Discharge Elbow© Copyright Beaudrey, 2006DeckPlatformHydraulicDriveWIPModuleScoopWIP SCREENWall PlatesFish PumpTraveling Screen(Before)WIP Deck Platform(After)
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CHIRON CORPORATION**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

In connection withthe periodic report of **CHIRON CORPORATION, aDelaware corporation**(the “Company”), on Form 10-Q forthe period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, **HOWARD H. PIEN, ChiefExecutive Officer**of the Company, hereby certify as of the datehereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of theUnited States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)   theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

ThisCertification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with theSecurities and Exchange Commission.
| Date: May 6, 2005 | By:        | /s/ HOWARD  H. PIEN           |
|------------------------|------------|-------------------------------|
| ** **             | ** ** | **HOWARD H. PIEN**            |
| *** ***           | ** ** | ***Chief Executive Officer*** |

 

----