alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2396 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2396

 To amend the Congressional Award Act to revise and extend authorities 
                   for the Congressional Award Board.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 1995

 Mr. Payne of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. Schaefer) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Economic and 
                       Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Congressional Award Act to revise and extend authorities 
                   for the Congressional Award Board.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Congressional Award Act Amendments 
of 1995''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF REQUIREMENTS REGARDING FINANCIAL OPERATIONS OF 
              CONGRESSIONAL AWARD PROGRAM; NONCOMPLIANCE WITH 
              REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 5(c)(2)(A) of the Congressional Award Act (2 U.S.C. 
804(c)(2)(A)) is amended by striking ``and 1994'' and inserting ``1994, 
1995, 1996, and 1997''.

SEC. 3. TERMINATION.

    Section 9 of the Congressional Award Act (2 U.S.C. 808) is amended 
by striking ``October 1, 1995'' and inserting ``October 1, 1998''.
                                 <all>
```
---

EXHIBIT 31.2

SENIOR VICE-PRESIDENT AND CFO (PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT
RULE 13(a)-14(a)/15d-14(a)

I, Robert Fowler, Senior Vice-President and CFO of Church Loans & Investments Trust certify that:

> I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Church Loans & Investments Trust;
>     Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;
>     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;
>     The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
>     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual Report is being prepared;
>         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report based on such evaluation; and
>         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
>     The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's Board of Trust Managers:All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
>       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.Dated:
>           June 29, 2004
>           
>           /s/  Robert FowlerRobert Fowler, Senior
>           Vice-President and CFO

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2270 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2270

To require Congress to specify the source of authority under the United 
 States Constitution for the enactment of laws, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 6, 1995

 Mr. Shadegg introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require Congress to specify the source of authority under the United 
 States Constitution for the enactment of laws, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIFICATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY FOR ENACTMENT OF 
              LAW.

    (a) Constitutional Authority.--This Act is enacted pursuant to the 
power granted Congress under Article I, section 8, clause 18, of the 
United States Constitution.
    (b) In General.--Chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 102 the following new section:
``Sec. 102a. Constitutional authority clause
    ``(a) A constitutional authority clause shall follow the enacting 
clause of any Act of Congress or the resolving clause of any joint 
resolution. The constitutional authority clause shall be in the 
following form (with appropriate modifications and appropriate matter 
inserted in the blanks):
    ```This Act (or resolution) is enacted pursuant to the power(s) 
granted to the Congress under Article(s) ______________ section(s) 
______________, clause(s) ______________ of the United States 
Constitution.'''.
    ``(b) A similar clause shall precede the first title, section, 
subsection or paragraph, and each following title, section, subsection 
or paragraph to the extent the later title, section, subsection or 
paragraph relies on a different article, section, or clause of the 
Constitution from the one pursuant to which the first title, section, 
subsection or paragraph is enacted.''.
    (c) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for 
chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to section 102 the following:

``102a. Constitutional authority clause.''.
                                 <all>
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 239

To rescind the fee required for the use of public recreation areas at lakes

and reservoirs under the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engineers,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. EMERSON (for himself, Mr. SKELTON, and Mr. HANCOCK) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation

and Infrastructure

A BILL

To rescind the fee required for the use of public recreation

areas at lakes and reservoirs under the jurisdiction of

the Army Corps of Engineers, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RESCISSION OF RECREATIONAL USER FEES.

4 Section 210(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (16

5 U.S.C. 460d–3(b)) is amended to read as follows:

6 ‘‘(b) USER FEES.—User fees at the lakes and res7 ervoirs referred to in subsection (a) shall be collected by

8 officers and employees of the United States only from

9 users of highly developed facilities requiring continuous
2

•HR 239 IH

1 presence of personnel for maintenance and supervision of

2 the facilities and shall not be collected for access to or

3 use of water areas, beaches, picnic grounds, overlook sites,

4 scenic drives, or boat launching ramps.’’.

Æ
#### In the Matter of the Guardianship of Milton J. B. Moore, a Minor.

Order of surrogate affirmed, with costs aud disbursements. Opinion by

Pratt, J.
From: Melinda Down [mailto:mdown@swbell.net] 

Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 9:50 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Incurance Coverage for Neurofeedback

I am a licensed psychologist who provides neurofeedback treatment to individuals with 

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Mood Disorders. Neurofeedback is an 

empirically validated and widely recognized effective non-medication treatment for 

ADHD, as well as other conditions. There are over 50 studies evaluating the effectiveness 

of neurofeedback in the treatment of ADHD, substance use disorders and Autism. A 

recent review of this literature concluded "Neurofeedback meets the American Academy 

of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry criteria for Clinical Guidelines for treatment of 

ADHD." This means that neurofeedback meets the same criteria as medication for 

treating ADHD, of which 60% of prescriptions are in fact prescribed "off label," and that 

neurofeedback "should always be considered as an intervention for this disorder by the 

clinician." 

This service has been denied by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, United Behavioral Health, 

Blue Cross, Cigna, and Amerigroup. 

This is limitation of an effective and validated treatment for a mental health problem. The 

reasons given by the insurance companies for this denial fell into two categories: 1) our 

company does not cover biofeedback for mental health problems or 2) there is not yet 

sufficient evidence for the efficacy of neurofeedback. As such, they are using evidencebased criteria that are far more restrictive for mental health services than the criteria 

which are used for medical/surgical services. There are many routine medical and 

surgical procedures which have far fewer controlled studies about their efficacy than does 

neurofeedback. These medical and surgical procedures are generally not limited because 

of concerns about how many controlled studies have been performed about them. 

We believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity statute should 

require that employers and plans pay for the same range and scope of services for 

behavioral treatments as they do for medical surgical benefits and that a plan cannot be 

more restrictive in their managed care criteria and reviews for mental health and 

substance abuse disorders when compared to medical surgery. Today plans are being 

more restrictive in how they review evidenced-based mental health and Substance Abuse 

Treatments when compared to medical surgical treatments. This violates both the intent 

and letter of the parity statute and we hope that the regulations will clarify that this can't 

continue. 

Melinda Down, Ph.D. 

San Antonio, Texas
-----Original Message----- 

From: deutsch_8@yahoo.com [mailto:deutsch_8@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:29 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Carolee Conway 

1940 A Street 

Gering, NE 69341
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 31, 1995 (137), Para 137.29 Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Pages 1821-1822]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.137.29  public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 5 of rule X and clause 4 of rule XXII, public bills and 
resolu

[[Page 1822]]

tions were introduced and severally referred as follows:

           By Mr. YOUNG of Alaska:
       H.R. 2561. A bill to provide for an exchange of lands 
     located near Gustavus, AK; to the Committee on Resources.
           By Mr. STEARNS (for himself, Mr. English of 
             Pennsylvania, Mr. Murtha, Mr. Towns, Mr. Quinn, Mr. 
             McHugh, Mr. Paxon, Mr. Walsh, Mr. Houghton, Mr. 
             Hancock, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. Frelinghuysen, Mr. 
             Clinger, Mr. McHale, and Mr. Talent):
       H.R. 2562. A bill to repeal section 210 of the Public 
     Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978; to the Committee on 
     Commerce.
           By Mr. LONGLEY:
       H.R. 2563. A bill to authorize certain operations of 
     Canadian oil spill response and recovery vessels in waters of 
     the United States; to the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure.
           By Mr. CANADY (for himself, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, 
             Mr. Shays, and Mr. McHale):
       H.R. 2564. A bill to provide for the disclosure of lobbying 
     activities to influence the Federal Government, and for other 
     purposes; to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition 
     to the Committees on Government Reform and Oversight, Rules, 
     and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 
     determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of 
     such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
     committee concerned.
           By Mr. HORN (for himself, Mr. Inglis of South Carolina, 
             and Mrs. Smith of Washington):
       H.R. 2565. A bill to amend the Federal Election Campaign 
     Act of 1971 to ban activities of political action committees 
     in House of Representatives elections and for other purposes; 
     to the Committee on House Oversight.
           By Mrs. SMITH of Washington (for herself, Mr. Meehan, 
             Mr. Shays, Mr. Minge, Mrs. Roukema, Mr. Bereuter, Mr. 
             Poshard, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Leach, Mr. Horn, Mr. Inglis 
             of South Carolina, and Mr. Forbes):
       H.R. 2566. A bill to reform the financing of Federal 
     elections, and for other purposes; to the Committee on House 
     Oversight.
```
From: mystic713@charter.net [mailto:mystic713@charter.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:01 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Laurie Ware 

52 High St 

Shrewsbury, MA 01545
# National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month, 2007 

National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month provides an opportunity to underscore our commitment to stopping alcohol and drug abuse before it starts and to helping citizens in need overcome addiction and rebuild their lives.

Alcohol and drug addiction can ruin lives and devastate families. We must continue working toward a society in which our citizens can lead lives free from the influence of alcohol and drugs. Friends and family members can play a vital role in the fight and prevention of abuse by discussing the dangers and consequences with loved ones.

My Administration is dedicated to the battle against drug and alcohol addiction. We are expanding access to treatment and recovery support services through the Access to Recovery program. The Drug Enforcement Agency is helping stem the flow of illegal drugs into the United States by targeting the production, distribution, and sale of methamphetamines and other precursor drugs. The Drug Free Communities Program helps our neighborhoods develop strategies to prevent substance abuse. First Lady Laura Bush also leads the Helping America's Youth program to help our Nation's young people make healthy choices throughout their lives and to encourage community and family-based approaches to the challenges and risks facing today's youth.

During National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month and throughout the year, we seek to raise awareness about the destructive cycle of addiction and work to provide assistance to those who suffer from substance abuse. This year's theme, “Join the Voices for Recovery: Saving Lives, Saving Dollars,” encourages Americans to recognize the costs of substance use disorders and understand the benefits that treatment can bring to those individuals, their families, and communities. To find out more about how to help save lives from substance abuse, contribute to a culture of compassion, and create a healthy future for our country, citizens may visit recoverymonth.gov.

                        NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 2007 as National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month. I call upon the people of the United States to observe this month with the appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.                               ( print page 48930)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-first day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07-4198

Billing code 3195-01-P
§ 271.103 Risk-based hazard management program. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) An RRP shall include an integrated, system-wide, and ongoing risk-based HMP that proactively identifies hazards and mitigates the risks resulting from those hazards.
( 2 ) A risk-based HMP shall be fully implemented (*i.e.,* activities initiated) within 36 months after FRA approves a railroad's RRP plan pursuant to § 271.301(d).
( b ) *Risk-based hazard analysis.* As part of its risk-based HMP, a railroad shall conduct a risk-based hazard analysis that addresses, at a minimum, the following aspects of a railroad's system: Infrastructure; equipment; employee levels and work schedules; operating rules and practices; management structure; employee training; and other areas impacting railroad safety that are not covered by railroad safety laws or regulations or other Federal laws or regulations. A railroad shall make the results of its risk-based hazard analysis available to FRA upon request. At a minimum, a risk-based hazard analysis shall: ( 1 ) Identify hazards by analyzing: ( i ) Aspects of the railroad's system, including any operational changes, system extensions, or system modifications; and
( ii ) Accidents/incidents, injuries, fatalities, and other known indicators of hazards;
( 2 ) Calculate risk by determining and analyzing the likelihood and severity of potential events associated with identified risk-based hazards; and
( 3 ) Compare and prioritize the identified risks for mitigation purposes.
( c ) *Mitigation strategies.* ( 1 ) As part of its risk-based HMP, a railroad shall design and implement mitigation strategies that improve safety by: ( i ) Mitigating or eliminating aspects of a railroad's system that increase risks identified in the risk-based hazard analysis; and
( ii ) Enhancing aspects of a railroad's system that decrease risks identified in the risk-based hazard analysis.
( 2 ) A railroad may use pilot projects, including pilot projects conducted by other railroads, to determine whether quantitative data suggests that a particular mitigation strategy has potential to succeed on a full-scale basis.
#### § 236.507 Brake application; full service.

The automatic train stop or train control apparatus shall, when operated, cause a full service application of the brakes.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6968** 

DOMMERNICK BROWN, United States of America, Suis Juris

- Pro Se and Pro Se Coach

- In Forma Pauperis and Supporter of The Second Coming of Jesus Christ Super

- Star The Messiah and Super

- Star

- and The Version of The New World Order #777 ALMIGHTY

- GODS New World Order 777 , Petitioner

– Appellant ,

v. HON. WARDEN B. R. JETT, Warden of the Federal Medical Center (located in Rochester, Minnesota) , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. ( 4:15

- cv - 01983

- TLW )

Submitted : October 30, 2015 Decided: November 6, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.
Dommernick Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dommernick Brown, a federal prisoner, appeal s the district

co urt ’ s order dimissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice . The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012)

. The magistrate judge recommended that the § 2241 petition be
dismissed without prejudice and advised Brown that failure to file timely , specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the
recommendation. The district court found that no objections
were filed and di smissed the § 2241 petition. The record
discloses , however, that Brown filed timely objections to t he magistrate judge’s report . The objections were mistakenly construed as a notice of appeal of th e district court’s order because they were received after entry of that order. We accordingly vacate the district court’s order and remand for consideration of Brown’s timely objections. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

* We have construed Brown’s informal brief as a timely notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); Smith v. Barry , 502 U.S. 244, 248

- 49 (1992).3 adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
EXHIBIT 23






                                FIRSTENERGY CORP.

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-48587,  333-102074 and 333-103865) and Form S-8
(Nos.  333-48651,   333-56094,   333-58279,   333-67798,  333-72764,  333-72766,
333-72768,  333-75985,  333-81183,  333-89356,  333-101472  and  333-110662)  of
FirstEnergy  Corp.  of our  report  dated  February  25,  2004  relating  to the
consolidated  financial  statements,  which  appears  in the  Annual  Report  to
Stockholders,  which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also
consent to the  incorporation by reference of our report dated February 25, 2004
relating to the financial statement schedules, which appear in this Form 10-K.





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 11, 2004

                                      105