alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOBLE MATHEW

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

C ASE NO. 1D 15

- 3887

Opinion filed October 14, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Matthew R. McLain of Brownstone, P.A., Winter Park , for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief,

Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Munn v. Florida Parole Commission , 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st

DCA 2002).

BENTON, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Hattie J. Hawley v. Arthur H. Hawley.

Decree affirmed, with costs against appellant. Opinion by

Learned, P. J'.
#### JOHN BETZEMANN, Respondent, *v.*MARY E. BROOKS, Appellant.

*Attachment*— maty *be vacated on motion after it has become inoperative by reason of a failure to serve the summons*— *Code of Civil Procedure, sec.*638.

A motion lies to vacate an attachment which has become inoperative by reason of the failure of the plaintiff to serve the summons within thirty days from the time of the issuing and service of the attachment.

Appeal from an order made at a Special Term, denying a motion to vacate an attachment.

*Eelly c& MeRae,*for tlie appellant.

*Edward P. Wilder,*for the respondent.

Daniels, J.:

After the attachment was issued, it was served by the officer on ■Susan E. Donahue as the occupant of premises owned by the ■defendant, and also upon the Bank of the Metropolis, where it was reported that she had funds on deposit, but which the officer was informed was not the fact. This service was made on the 26th ■day of June, 1883, but the summons in the action was in no form served until the 26th of July, 1883, which was more than thirty days after the issuing, and of this service, of the attachment. The ■court denied the motion to vacate it, apparently on the ground that it had become inoperative.aud could be of no possible injury to the defendant, but that was not an answer to the motion. Proceedings had been taken under the attachment, and although it had become inoperative by reason of the omission to serve the summons, the ■defendant was still entitled to an order definitely declaring that to *272be the fact. *(Blossom*v. *Estes,*22 Hun, *472;*affirmed, 84 N. Y., 614.)

Under this authority the order made should be reversed, with the usual costs and disbursements, and an order entered vacating the attachment.

Davis, P. J., and Bradt, J., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and attachment vacated.
-----Original Message----- 

From: lockardp@bhc.edu [mailto:lockardp@bhc.edu] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:54 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Paul Lockard 

5359 36th avenue court 

Moline, IL 61265
Exhibit 35.2





COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


OF


THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY, AS SERVICER


The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the duly elected and acting Vice President and Treasurer of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, as servicer (the “ Servicer ”) under the Phase-In-Recovery Property Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2013 (the “ Servicing Agreement ”), between the Servicer and CEI Funding LLC, as Bond Issuer, and further certifies on behalf of the Servicer that:


|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement during the period that commenced January 1, 2018 and ended December 31, 2018 has been made under the supervision of the undersigned pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Servicing Agreement; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Servicing Agreement throughout the period that commenced January 1, 2018 and ended December 31, 2018.

Executed as of this 29th day of March 2019.





THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANYBy:/s/ Steven R. StaubName:Steven R. StaubTitle:Vice President and Treasurer
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/13/15 9:57 AM

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwm-c3rl

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2010

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: JoAnn Roberts

Address: 

6016 Schafer Rd

Lansing, MI, 48911

Email: joannmckimroberts@hotmail.com

Phone: 517-290-7102

General Comment

I work with almost 100,000 co-workers at Primerica Financial Services. Our company takes 

pride in its integrity and has a very strict compliance Division. If this proposal is approved it 

would be devastating for those representatives like myself who have taken a lot of pride in 

helping the "middle class for 11 years. We have also paid the State of Michigan a lot of money 

for renewing securities licenses, as well as, doing continuing education and following the rules. 

I take a lot of pride in servicing my clients as do my associates. The impact of this would be 

totally devastating not only to lower income families, but also to the families of all of the 

representatives of the company. Primerica is a publically traded company and there are already 

many, many compliance regulations we must abide by. Integrity and doing the right thing for 

our clients is something that all of our representatives take a lot of pride in.

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b7be0a&format=xml&show... 7/13/2015
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0633 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Eileen Roberts 

Address: 

Healdsburg, CA, 95448 

Email: drrobs@hotmail.com 

Phone: 707-338-9084 

Organization: Dr. Eileen Roberts 

General Comment 

While the rules go a long way towards achieving parity between MH/SA and medical/surgical 

services coverage there is not enough specificity in some of the language, thereby creating a 

loophole through which insurance companies may continue inequitable coverage and defeat the 

purpose of this act. Specifically the rules must somehow state that coverage for MH/SA services 

must also be comparable in scope to the benefits approved in medical/surgical coverage. The 

wording needs to make clear that the scope of benefits must be equivalent both across and within 

each classification. 

It is also critical that the same standards be used to determine whether something is deemed 

"experimental" or medically appropriate care. THE SAME STANDARDS IN TERMS OF SCIENTIFIC 

REVIEW CRITERIA MUST BE USED TO DETERMINE WHETHER A PROCEDURE OR SERVICE IS 

CONSIDERED WITHIN STANDARD CARE OR IS DEEMED EXPERIMENTAL AND THEREFORE 

DENIED. This inequity is rampant. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: April 30, 2010 

Received: April 29, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ae3e97 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 4/30/2010
§ 236.567 Restrictions imposed when device fails and/or is cut out en route. ( a ) Except as provided in subparts H or I of this part, where an automatic train stop, train control, or cab signal device fails and/or is cut out en route, the train on which the device is inoperative may proceed to the next available point of communication where report must be made to a designated officer, at speeds not to exceed the following: ( 1 ) If no block signal system is in operation, restricted speed; or
( 2 ) If a block signal system is in operation, according to signal indication but not to exceed 40 miles per hour.
( b ) Upon completion and communication of the report required by paragraph (a) of this section, a train may continue to a point where an absolute block can be established in advance of the train at speeds not to exceed the following: ( 1 ) If no block signal system is in operation, restricted speed; or
( 2 ) If a block signal system is in operation, according to signal indication but not to exceed 40 miles per hour.
( c ) Upon reaching the location where an absolute block has been established in advance of the train, as referenced in paragraph (b) of this section, the train may proceed at speeds not to exceed the following: ( 1 ) If no block signal system is in operation and the train is a passenger train, 59 miles per hour;
( 2 ) If no block signal system is in operation and the train is a freight train, 49 miles per hour; and
( 3 ) If a block signal system is in operation, 79 miles per hour.
[79 FR 49715, Aug. 22, 2014]
§ 232.7 Waivers. ( a ) Any person subject to a requirement of this part may petition the Administrator for a waiver of compliance with such requirement. The filing of such a petition does not affect that person's responsibility for compliance with that requirement while the petition is being considered.
( b ) Each petition for waiver must be filed in the manner and contain the information required by part 211 of this chapter.
( c ) If the Administrator finds that a waiver of compliance is in the public interest and is consistent with railroad safety, the Administrator may grant the waiver subject to any conditions the Administrator deems necessary. If a waiver is granted, the Administrator publishes a notice in the Federal Register containing the reasons for granting the waiver.
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the matter of 

2010 U.S.-Haneda Combination Services 

Allocation Proceeding 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket DOT-OST-2010-0018 

ANSWER OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

TO HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC.

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to: 

 

Andrea Fischer Newman 

Senior Vice President – Government Affairs 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 

1212 New York Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director – Government Affairs 

 & Associate General Counsel 

Jeff Morgan 

Regional Director – Government Affairs 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 

1212 New York Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

(202) 842-4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

April 11, 2011
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the matter of 

2010 U.S.-Haneda Combination Services 

Allocation Proceeding 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket DOT-OST-2010-0018 

ANSWER OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

TO HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC.

Hawaiian’s application for a Haneda backup award in the wake of the 

Japanese tragedy, like United’s, is without merit. Delta’s Los Angeles-Haneda flight 

resumes on June 2, and Delta’s Detroit-Haneda flight resumes on June 16 in full 

compliance with the Department’s 90 day dormancy condition. 

Hawaiian admits that its loads on the Tokyo-Honolulu route have declined 

since the disaster, and every U.S. carrier serving Tokyo from the U.S. mainland has 

dramatically reduced capacity. Delta’s decision to temporarily suspend Haneda 

service until the immediate effects of the disaster have abated, and resume service 

in June for the summer peak is appropriate, and allowed by the Department’s Order. 

The Department did not award backup authority in this case, because “the 

public interest would be best served by allowing us to award any unused rights on 

the basis of a fresh record.” Order 2010-7-2. Hawaiian’s efforts to secure a backup 

award under the current and highly unusual conditions in the U.S.-Japan market are 

inconsistent with the Department’s Order. 
Delta Answer 

Page 2 

 

 Respectfully submitted,

_________________________________ 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director, Government Affairs 

 & Associate General Counsel 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

A copy of the foregoing document has been served this 11th day of April, 2011, upon the 

following persons via email: 

carl.nelson@aa.com 

dan.weiss@coair.com 

thomas.bolling@coair.com 

jeffrey.manley@united.com 

Annalei.Avancena@united.com 

bruce.rabinovitz@wilmerhale.com 

howard.kass@usairways.com 

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com 

jhill@dowlohnes.com 

LDeavers@dowlohnes.com 

paul.gretch@dot.gov 

keith.glatz@dot.gov 

esta.rosenberg@dot.gov 

todd.homan@dot.gov 

urskr@state.gov 

eugene_alford@ita.doc.gov 

mike.orr@airlineinfo.com
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United Bancorporation
of Alabama, Inc. for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert
R. Jones, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1). The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and(2). The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Corporation. Date:      May 14, 2004
    By:
    /s/
Robert R. Jones, IIIRobert R. Jones, IIIChief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 165 (Monday, August 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 49017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4166]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--the Nanoparticle Flow Processing Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 16, 2007, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Nanoparticle Flow Processing 
Consortium has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and 
objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: 3M Company, St. Paul, MN; The Proctor & Gamble 
Company, Cincinnati, OH; Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY; BASF 
Aktiengesellschaft, Ludwigshafen, Germany, and Imperial Chemical 
Industries PLC, London, United Kingdom. The general area of 
Nanoparticle Flow Processing Consortium's planned activity is to: (1) 
Develop, test, and validate computer-simulation technologies of near-
term application that can improve the quality and reduce the cost of 
nanoparticle suspension/dispersion manufacture (including suspension 
stability and processibility); (2) transfer the technology developed 
under the Research and Development Program in a manner that offers the 
Consortium members opportunities for commercial advantage; and (3) 
develop methodologies and aptitude for modeling and simulation of 
multiscale phenomena intrinsic to the stability and dynamics of dense, 
nanoparticle suspensions. This development will be synergistic and 
applicable to many U.S. Department of Energy campaigns for simulation 
(viz. C6, ASC, and other science and technology initiatives like those 
underpinning MESA).

J. Robert Kramer II,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-4166 Filed 8-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2417

To provide that United States Armed Forces may not participate in a peacekeeping operation in Bosnia-Herzegovnia unless such participation is

specifically authorized by law.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1995

Mr. HEFLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on National Security, and in addition to the Committee on International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To provide that United States Armed Forces may not participate in a peacekeeping operation in Bosnia-Herzegovnia

unless such participation is specifically authorized by law.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON DEPLOYMENT OF ARMED

4 FORCES IN BOSNIA-HERZEGOVNIA.

5 (a) LIMITATION.—None of the funds available to the

6 Department of Defense may be obligated or expended (ex7 cept as provided in subsection (b)) for the deployment or

8 participation of United States Armed Forces in any peace-
2

•HR 2417 IH

1 keeping operation in Bosnia-Herzegovnia unless the de2 ployment or operation is specifically authorized by a law

3 enacted after the date of the enactment of this Act.

4 (b) EXCEPTIONS.—This section does not apply to—

5 (1) operations of the nature and extent con6 ducted by United States Armed Forces in Bosnia7 Herzegovnia during fiscal year 1995;

8 (2) emergency air rescue operations;

9 (3) the airborne delivery of humanitarian sup10 plies; or

11 (4) the planning and execution of OPLAN

12 40104 or a similar operation to extract

13 UNPROFOR personnel.

Æ
United States Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460
Section 4 Submission This is an original submission: This is an amendment: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that (1) all information entered on this form is complete and accurate; and (2) any confidentiality claims are true and correct as to that information for which they have been asserted. Any knowing and willful misinterpretation is subject to criminal penalty pursuant to 18 USC 1001. Signature: Official Title: Regulatory Compliance Specialist Contact Person: Lynne Oreschnigg Email Address: lynne_oreschnigg@huntsman.com Date Signed: 06/25/2014 PART 1 Contact Information Submission Information Submission Type:

TestRules Form Alias: TestRules-20140625-11:19:23 EDT Federal Register Notice: 76 FR 65385 Date Submitted: 06/25/2014 Submitter Information Company Name:

HUNTSMAN Address: 8600 GOSLING ROAD THE WOODLANDS, TX, 77381 United States Contact Person: Lynne Oreschnigg Phone Number: 2817193021 Email Address: lynne_oreschnigg@huntsman.com Technical Contact Information CBI

Yes: No: Company Name: HUNTSMAN Address: 8600 GOSLING ROAD THE WOODLANDS, TX, 77381 United States Contact Person: Ms Lynne Oreschnigg Phone Number: 2817193021 Email Address: lynne_oreschnigg@huntsman.com PART 2 Letter Of IntentSEC4 Submission Page 2

Chemical Identification CASRN:

5026-74-4 CBI Yes: No:
Chemical Name: 2-Oxiranemethanamine, N-[4-(2-oxiranylmethoxy)phenyl]-N- (2- oxiranylmethyl)- Chemical Test Name: F1 Sponsoring Firms CBI

Yes: No: Company Name: Huntsman Address: 10003 Woodloch Forest Drive The Woodlands, TX, 77380 United States Phone Number: 2817193021 Additional Information Document Type:

Submission of Equivalence Data CBI Yes: No:
File Name: REPEATED DOSE 28-DAY ORAL TOXICITY STUDY.pdf Attachment Date: 06/25/2014

Sanitized Document Upload: N/A Document Type: Submission of Equivalence Data CBI Yes: No:
File Name: TSCA Section 4 Test Rule Follow up 5026-74-4.pdf Attachment Date: 06/25/2014

Sanitized Document Upload: N/A Chemicals Paperwork Reduction Act:The Government Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA) (44 U.S.C. 3501) provides that, when practicable, Federal organizations use electronic forms, electronic filings, and electronic signatures to conduct official business with the public. EPA's Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Regulation (CROMERR) (40 CFR part 3), published in the Federal Register on October 13, 2005 (70 FR 59848) (FRL-7977-1)(Ref. 2), provides that any requirement in title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to submit a report directly to EPA can be satisfied with an electronic submission that meets certain conditions once the Agency published a notice in the Federal Register announcing that EPA is prepared to receive certain documents in electronic form. For more information about CROMERR, go tohttp://www.epa.gov/cromerr/

.
### THC MACT FLOOR ANALYSES

**Com pany** **Location Kiln**  **Average Kiln Type**  **In-line raw m ill** 
TXI Midlothian Kiln 5 5.83 preheater/calciner yes Holcim Trident Kiln #1 5.69 wet no SuwanneeBranford, FL Kiln 5.68 preheater/calciner yes Holcim Mason City Kiln #3 10.90 long dry no Lehigh Union Bridge E02-001 4.69 preheater/calciner yes Holcim Mason City Kiln #2 11.07 long dry no Titan Pennsuco Kiln 12.81 preheater/calciner yes Titan Roanoke, VA Kiln 5 12.93 preheater/calciner yes Holcim Theodore, AL Kiln #1 23.74 preheater/calciner yes Holcim Portland, CO Kiln #4 44.97 preheater/calciner yes Holcim Midlothian, TX Kiln #1 51.59 preheater/calciner yes Holcim Devil's Slide, UT Kiln #1 51.91 preheater/calciner yes Holcim Midlothian, TX Kiln #2 62.82 preheater/calciner yes

Holcim Dundee Kiln #1 and Kiln #2
Combined 748.15wet no