alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Jackson, Ken [mailto:Ken.Jackson@axa-advisors.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 3:10 PM

Subject: New Regulaton on Advisors

Hello,

Recently I helped a client decide what to do with his 401(k) account when he terminated 

employment with his previous employer.

He came to the conclusion that rolling the assets into an Individual Retirement Account (IRA) 

was the best choice him and his retirement goals.

I helped him decide how to invest the IRA account to best meet his level of investment risk, 

financial situation, tax situation, investment objectives, liquidity needs. He chose an annuity that 

gave his options to multiple mutual funds from multiple funds families, that better met his needs 

than the limited funds in the employer’s 401(k). I received commissions from the purchase an 

annuity. Under the current rule, I would be prohibited from providing any of those services. The 

likely result would be that he would instead cashed out his 401(k) and would suffer the tax and 

the early withdrawal penalty, to buy a jet ski; at least that’s what he told me.... a wrong decision, 

but one likely if he hadn’t had access to my services.

Ken Jackson

Financial Consultant

AXA Advisors, LLC

1515 W 22nd Street

Oakbrook IL 60523

Office: 630-954-6884

Ken Jackson is a registered representative who offers securities through AXA Advisors, LLC (NY, NY 212-

314-4600), member FINRA, SIPC and an agent who offers annuity and insurance products through AXA 

Network, LLC. AXA Network conducts business in CA as AXA Network Insurance Agency of California, 

LLC, in UT as AXA Network Insurance Agency of Utah, LLC, and in PR as AXA Network of Puerto Rico, 

Inc. Investment advisory products and services offered through AXA Advisors, LLC, an investment 

advisor registered with the SEC. AXA Advisors and AXA Network are affiliated companies and do not 

provide tax or legal advice. Representatives may transact business, which includes offering products and 

services and/or responding to inquiries, only in state(s) in which they are properly registered and/or 

licensed. Your receipt of this e-mail does not necessarily indicate that the sender is able to transact 

business in your state.

**********************************************************************

This message and any attachments may contain legally privileged and/or 

sensitive information. Any unapproved disclosure, use or dissemination 

of this e-mail message or its contents, either in whole or in part, is 

not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail

message, kindly notify the sender and then securely dispose of it.

**********************************************************************
Gerald C. Mann

Hon. T. M. Trlmble Opinion Bo. 

### O-4033 First Assistant State Re: Whether independent school Superintendent of Public district maymakedeductions Instruction from salaries of teachers for Austin, Texas hospitalization plan. Dear Sir: Wehave received your letter of recent date asking the opinion of this department upon the above captioned question. Wealso have the letter of September 

### 19,1941, from Mr. E. W. Jackson, Superintendent of the Beaumont Independent School District, to Dr. L. A. Woods, State Superintendent, andthe letter of October 8, 1941 from Mr. T. N. Whitehurst, East Texas Manager of the Pan-Am erican Life Insurance Company, to Mr. Jackson. We quote the following from Mr. Jackson’s letter to Dr. Woods:

“The plan proposed would provide for no financial obligations on the part of our Board of Education unless it be for a slight amount of clerical work necessary In makingthe monthly deductions fromthe salaries of teachers participating in the hospitalization plan.@’ Weknowof no reason whyteachers of independent sczhool districts should not be allowed to avail themselves of the benefits of a hospitalization plan. This would be purely a private undertaking, andthere is nothing in the statutes or in their employment which would prohibit such anundertaking on their part.

Youwish to knowwhether the clerical work of making monthly deductions from the salaries of the teachers may be,done by the district.

Theproposed plan imposes no financial obligation on the part of the district. Theteachers would enter the plan on a purely voluntary basis, andwe see no reason why the teachers maynot authorize the district to makedeductions from their salaries for oayment of the premium. Aswe have mentioned above, partici,patlon in the plan is purely voluntaryjHon. T. M. Trimble, Page 2

therefore, the teachers could withdraw both their membership in the plan andtheir authorization to the district to make the d,edutitions at any time.

It is, therefore, the opinion of this department under the facts submitted to this department that the teachers of an Independent school district mayenter the described hospitalization plan, andthe district maymakethe monthly deductions from the salaries of the teachers participating in the plan for payment of the premium. This view is especially strengthened by Article 

### 2883a,Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes, which provides for the assignment of salaries of school teachers under conditions therein stated.

Wewant to emphasize that we express no opinion except as to the particular facts disclosed herein, andthis opinion is limited accordingly. Yours very truly ATTORNEY

GENERAL

OFTEXAS By/s/ George W. Sparks George W. Sparks, .Assistant APPROVED

OCT23, 1941 /s/ Grover Sellers FIRSTASSISTANT ATTORNEY

GENERAL APPROVED:

OPINIONCOMMITTEE BY: BWB,Chairman GWS:LM:wb
Page 1 of 1 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: May 28,2009 

Tracking No, 809adafR 

Comments Duc: May 28,2009 

Docket: IRS-3J&t)OC)l 

Request for information for Paul Wellstol~c and Pete Domenici Menta t Hcalth Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: I RS,_2_009-0008-O~K!~. 

Request for Infonnntion Regarding the Paul W ellstone and Pete Oomenicj Mental Health Parity 

and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: TR S-20U.Y,0008:0029 

Comment on ER Doc # E9-09629 

Submitter Information 

Name: MaryAnn Conley 

Address: 

Alhuquerquc,, NM, 

Organization: MaryAm~ Conley, P h.D. 

General Comment 

I have been a practiliuner of Biofeedback for more than 20 years. 1 am also a 

Ph.n. Cl~llical Psychulogist. The most effective treatment I have us4 in 

working w t'ith clients who have anxiety and panic: attacks has been peri phcral 

biofeedback. I strongly urge congrcss to include peripheral and ncurofidback 

in the parity bill. People wlzo suffer trom anxiety and panic attacks experience 

being out of control of thcir physical, emotiannl, and rncntal selves. With , 

biofeedback, they quickly acquire the knowlcdge that they can control 

pl~ysiological correlates of the ahove and hence regain the sense of control ova 

their mkds and hodi es. 

http:l/www .regulations.g0vIfdi11~public.otmiViw er?betd-09 Sr dis.. . 5/28/2009
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, October 12, 1995 (127), Para 127.35 Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1527]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.127.35  public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 5 of rule X and clause 4 of rule XXII, public bills and 
resolutions were introduced and severally referred as follows:

           By Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Blute, 
             Mr. Boehlert, Mr. English of Pennsylvania, Mr. Franks 
             of New Jersey, Mr. Gilman, Mr. Horn, Mr. Houghton, 
             Mr. LaTourette, Mr. Lazio of New York, Mr. LoBiondo, 
             Mr. Martini, Mr. Metcalf, Mr. McHugh, Mr. Riggs, Mr. 
             Shays, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Walsh, Mr. 
             Weller, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. Petri, Mr. Ney, Mr. 
             LaHood, Mr. Gilchrest, Mr. Quinn, Mr. Lewis of 
             California, Mr. Torkildsen, and Mr. Regula):
       H.R. 2472. A bill to amend the act of March 3, 1931 (known 
     as the Davis-Bacon Act), to revise the standards for coverage 
     under the act, and for other purposes; to the Committee on 
     Economic and Educational Opportunities.
           By Mr. COYNE:
       H.R. 2473. A bill to authorize funding within the 
     Department of the Interior to implement the plan of the Steel 
     Industry Heritage Project, and for other purposes; to the 
     Committee on Resources.
           By Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. Leach, Mr. Poshard, Mr. 
             Lightfoot, Mr. Johnson of South Dakota, and Mr. 
             Roemer):
       H.R. 2474. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 
     1986 to provide a 2-year extension of the tax incentives for 
     the use of alcohol as a fuel; to the Committee on Ways and 
     Means.
           By Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota:
       H.R. 2475. A bill to amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act 
     to require that imported meat and meat food products 
     containing imported meat be labeled imported, and to require 
     that certain eating establishments serving imported meat 
     inform customers of that fact; to the Committee on 
     Agriculture.
           By Mr. STUPAK:
       H.R. 2476. A bill to amend title XVIII of the Social 
     Security Act to provide for commonsense reforms of the 
     Medicare Program; to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in 
     addition to the Committees on Commerce, and the Judiciary, 
     for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
     each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 
     the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
           By Mrs. VUCANOVICH:
       H.R. 2477. A bill to designate the Nellis Federal hospital 
     in Las Vegas, NV, as the ``Michael O'Callaghan Military 
     Hospital'', and for other purposes; to the Committee on 
     National Security.
```
§ 240.225 Reliance on qualification determinations made by other railroads. ( a ) A railroad that is considering certification of a person as a qualified engineer may rely on determinations made by another railroad concerning that person's qualifications. The railroad's certification program shall address how the railroad will administer the training of previously uncertified engineers with extensive operating experience or previously certified engineers who have had their certification expire. If a railroad's certification program fails to specify how it will train a previously certified engineer hired from another railroad, then the railroad shall require the newly hired engineer to take the hiring railroad's entire training program.
( b ) A railroad relying on another's certification shall determine that: ( 1 ) The prior certification is still valid in accordance with the provisions of §§ 240.201, 240.217, and 240.307;
( 2 ) The prior certification was for the same classification of locomotive or train service as the certification being issued under this section;
( 3 ) The person has received training on and visually observed the physical characteristics of the new territory in accordance with § 240.123;
( 4 ) The person has demonstrated the necessary knowledge concerning the railroad's operating rules in accordance with § 240.125; and
( 5 ) The person has demonstrated the necessary performance skills concerning the railroad's operating rules in accordance with § 240.127.
[85 FR 81315, Dec. 15, 2020]
#### § 26.23 What is the requirement for a policy statement?

You must issue a signed and dated policy statement that expresses your commitment to your DBE program, states its objectives, and outlines responsibilities for its implementation. You must circulate the statement throughout your organization and to the DBE and non-DBE business communities that perform work on your DOT-assisted contracts.
-----Original Message----- 

From: danielms@humboldt1.com [mailto:danielms@humboldt1.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:44 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Daniel McCann-Sayles 

1696 Ocean Dr. 

McKinleyville, CA 95519
#### § 25.455 Textbooks and curricular material.

Nothing in these Title IX regulations shall be interpreted as requiring or prohibiting or abridging in any way the use of particular textbooks or curricular materials.
#### § 229.95 Venting.

Fuel tank vent pipes may not discharge on the roof nor on or between the rails.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 64]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ064.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 1997]]

Public Law 109-64
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To exclude from consideration as income certain payments under the 
   national flood insurance program. <<NOTE: Sept. 20, 2005 -  [H.R. 
                                 804]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PAYMENTS UNDER NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE 
            PROGRAM.

    Chapter I of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 
4011 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

                     ``treatment of certain payments

    ``Sec. 1324. <<NOTE: 42 USC 4031.>> Assistance provided under a 
program under this title for flood mitigation activities (including any 
assistance provided under the mitigation pilot program under section 
1361A, any assistance provided under the mitigation assistance program 
under section 1366, and any funding provided under section 1323) with 
respect to a property shall not be considered income or a resource of 
the owner of the property when determining eligibility for or benefit 
levels under any income assistance or resource-tested program that is 
funded in whole or in part by an agency of the United States or by 
appropriated funds of the United States.''.

    Approved September 20, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 804:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109-44 (Comm. on Financial Services).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            July 12, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 8, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 236.798 Section, dead.

A section of track, either within a track circuit or between two track circuits, the rails of which are not part of a track circuit.
From: hybrid.radar@gmail.com [mailto:hybrid.radar@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:17 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Adam William Davis 

105 Lansdowne Court 

Lansdowne, PA 19050
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2392

To amend the Umatilla Basin Project Act to establish boundaries for

irrigation districts within the Umatilla Basin, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 21, 1995

Mr. COOLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the Umatilla Basin Project Act to establish boundaries for irrigation districts within the Umatilla Basin,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF BOUNDARIES OF IRRIGA4 TION DISTRICTS WITHIN THE UMATILLA

5 BASIN.

6 (a) MODIFICATION OF BOUNDARIES.—Section 208 of

7 the Umatilla Basin Project Act (102 Stat. 2793) is

8 amended—

9 (1) by striking out ‘‘may be modified, upon ap10 proval of the Secretary of the Interior,’’ and insert-
2

•HR 2392 IH

1 ing in lieu thereof ‘‘are hereby modified, as depicted

2 in subsection (b)’’;

3 (2) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘When project’’;

4 and

5 (3) by adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(b)(1) The boundaries of the irrigation districts

7 modified by subsection (a) are the boundaries as generally

8 depicted on the following maps, entitled:

9 ‘‘(A) ‘Map # 1—Hermiston’.

10 ‘‘(B) ‘Map # 2—West Extension’.

11 ‘‘(C) ‘Map # 3—Westland’.

12 ‘‘(D) ‘Map # 4—Stanfield’.

13 ‘‘(2) The maps referred to in subsection (a) shall be

14 on file and available for public inspection in the Office of

15 the Secretary.’’.

16 (b) PROVISIONS RELATED TO ACREAGE SERVED BY

17 MODIFIED BOUNDARIES.—The Congress finds that the

18 modification of the boundaries of the irrigation districts

19 in the Umatilla River Basin by subsection (a) is in rec20 ognition of the historical delivery of irrigation water by

21 the irrigation districts and, therefore—

22 (1) the final environmental impact statement

23 prepared for the Umatilla Basin Project, Oregon

24 (dated February 12, 1988), is sufficient for the pur25 poses of this section;
3

•HR 2392 IH

1 (2) such modification shall be without cost to

2 the irrigation districts; and

3 (3) the Secretary of the Interior shall not re4 quire any payment related to the delivery of irriga5 tion water before the date of enactment of this Act

6 to areas outside of the boundaries of such irrigation

7 districts before October 1, 1988.

Æ
§ 228.411 Training. ( a ) *Individuals to be trained.* Except as provided by paragraph (f) of this section, each railroad subject to this subpart shall provide training for its employees subject to this subpart, and the immediate supervisors of its employees subject to this subpart.
( b ) *Subjects to be covered.* The training shall provide, at a minimum, information on the following subjects that is based on the most current available scientific and medical research literature: ( 1 ) Physiological and human factors that affect fatigue, as well as strategies to reduce or mitigate the effects of fatigue;
( 2 ) Opportunities for identification, diagnosis, and treatment of any medical condition that may affect alertness or fatigue, including sleep disorders;
( 3 ) Alertness strategies, such as policies on napping, to address acute drowsiness and fatigue while an employee is on duty;
( 4 ) Opportunities to obtain restful sleep at lodging facilities, including employee sleeping quarters provided by the railroad; and
( 5 ) The effects of abrupt changes in rest cycles for employees.
( c ) *Timing of initial training.* Initial training shall be provided to affected current employees not later than December 31, 2012, and to new employees subject to this subpart before the employee first works a schedule subject to analysis under this subpart, or not later than December 31, 2012, whichever occurs later.
( d ) *Timing of refresher training.* ( 1 ) At a minimum, refresher training shall be provided every three calendar years.
( 2 ) Additional refresher training shall also be provided when significant changes are made to the railroad's fatigue mitigation plan or to the available fatigue mitigation tools applied to an employee's assignment or assignments at the location where he or she works.
( e ) *Records of training.* A railroad shall maintain a record of each employee provided training in compliance with this section and shall retain these records for three years.
( f ) *Conditional exclusion.* A railroad engaged in tourist, scenic, historic, or excursion rail passenger transportation, may be excluded from the requirements of this section, if its train employees subject to this rule are assigned to work only schedules wholly within the hours of 4 a.m. and 8 p.m. on the same calendar day that comply with the provisions of § 228.405, upon that railroad's submission to the Associate Administrator of a written declaration, signed by an officer of the railroad, indicating that the railroad meets the limitations established in this paragraph.
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit Section
                                  Exhibit (21)


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


        The Registrant, Champion Industries, Inc., a West Virginia corporation,
does business under the trade name "Chapman Printing Company". Its wholly owned
subsidiaries are:

1.      The Chapman Printing Company, Inc., a West Virginia corporation.

2.      Stationers, Inc., a West Virginia corporation (doing business in Ohio as
        "Garrison Brewer").

3.      Bourque Printing, Inc., a Louisiana corporation.

4.      Dallas Printing Company, Inc., a Mississippi corporation.

5.      Carolina Cut Sheets, Inc., a West Virginia corporation.

6.      U.S. Tag & Ticket Company, Inc., a Maryland corporation.

7.      Donihe Graphics, Inc., a Tennessee corporation.

8.      Smith & Butterfield Co., Inc., an Indiana corporation.

9.      The Merten Company, an Ohio corporation.

10.     Interform Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation.

11.     CHMP Leasing, Inc., a West Virginia corporation.

12.     Blue Ridge Printing Co., Inc., a North Carolina corporation.

13.     Rose City Press, a West Virginia corporation

14.     Capitol Business Equipment, Inc., a West Virginia corporation

15.     Thompson's of Morgantown, Inc., a West Virginia corporation

16.     Independent Printing Service, Inc., an Indiana corporation

17.     Diez Business Machines, Inc., a Louisiana corporation

18.     Transdata Systems, Inc., a Louisiana corporation



                                  Exhibit 21-p1
## NUMBER 13 - 2 2 - 00 3 8 9 - C V COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN RE SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, XCEL ENERGY, INC. , AND XCEL ENERGY SERVICES

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

.



## ORDER Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva

Order Per Curiam On August 23, 2022, relators Southwestern Public Service Company, Xcel Energy Inc., and Xcel Energy Services, Inc. filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to vacate an order granting death penalty sanctions against them

. Rel ators also filed : (1) an unopposed motion to exceed the word

- count limit for the petition for writ of mandamus; and (2) an unopposed motion requesting that we take judicial notice of a mandamus record previously filed in our cause number 13

- 19

- 00111

- CV.2

T he Court requests that the real parties in interest , Eduardo Munoz Jr. and Kasandra Girela Munoz, individually and as next friend of J.S., a minor, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought , f ile a response to the petitio n for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten (10) days from the date of
this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8 . Further, t h e Court, having examined and fully considered the relators’ motion s , is of the opinion that they should be granted.
Accor dingly, we grant the relators’ unopposed motion to exceed the word

- count limit and
relators ’ unopposed motion for judicial notice of the mandamus record in cause number
13

- 19

- 00111

- CV. PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the 25 t h day of Augus t , 202 2

.