alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0255 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Kat Duff 

Address: 

HC 78 Box 9125 

Ranchos de Taos, NM, 87557 

Email: kduff@cybermesa.com 

Phone: 575-779-0005 

Organization: Community Against Violence 

General Comment 

To Whom it May Concern: 

I am writing to request that your agency include neurofeedback (also known as 

EEG Biofeedback) in your list of covered treatments under the Wellstone-Domenici 

Mental Health Parity Act of 2008. This treatment modality has been proven to 

provide reduction of symptoms and quantifiable behavioral changes in those with 

diagnoses of Seizure Disorder and ADHD, while also proving effective with the 

major mood disorders and traumatic brain injury. 

Sincerely, 

Kat Duff 

Licensed Professional Counselor

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 28, 2009 

Received: May 28, 2009 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 809bc8ac 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MAY 04, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-15159

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 91-00598-CR-SH

HAROLD BROWN, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

versus 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(May 4, 2007)

Before DUBINA, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Federal prisoner Harold Brown (“Brown”), proceeding pro se, appeals the

district court’s order dismissing his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) (“Rule 60(b)”) motion,

which the district court recharacterized as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (“§
2

2255") motion. We granted a Certificate of Appealability on the question of

whether the district court erred by treating appellant’s Rule 60(b) motion as an

impermissibly successive § 2255 motion to vacate pursuant to Gonzalez v. Crosby,

545 U.S. 524 (2005). 

The government concedes that the district court improperly treated Brown’s

Rule 60(b) motion as an unauthorized second or successive § 2255 motion.

Brown’s motion did not present new claims for relief, nor did it seek to relitigate

previous claims. The Rule 60(b) motion claimed a defect in the process of Brown’s

prior habeas proceedings. 

Accordingly, the district court erred in construing Brown’s Rule 60(b)

motion as a successive habeas corpus application. Without passing judgment on

the merits of Brown’s Rule 60(b) motion, we vacate and remand to the district

court so it can properly address Brown’s motion as a Rule 60(b) motion. 

VACATED AND REMANDED.
#### § 213.311 Measuring track not under load.

When unloaded track is measured to determine compliance with requirements of this subpart, evidence of rail movement, if any, that occurs while the track is loaded shall be added to the measurements of the unloaded track.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Reports of FirstEnergy Corp., Ohio Edison Company,
The  Cleveland  Electric   Illuminating  Company,  The  Toledo  Edison  Company,
Pennsylvania  Power  Company,  Metropolitan  Edison  Company,  and  Pennsylvania
Electric  Company  ("Companies")  on Form 10-K for the year ending  December 31,
2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Reports"),  each undersigned  officer of each of the Companies does hereby
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

          (1)  Each of the  Reports  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
               section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
               and

          (2)  The information contained in each of the Reports fairly presents,
               in all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company to which it relates.



                               /s/Anthony J. Alexander
                           -----------------------------------
                                  Anthony J. Alexander
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                     March 15, 2004



                                /s/Richard H. Marsh
                           -----------------------------------
                                   Richard H. Marsh
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                     March 15, 2004

                                      112
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 19, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William C. Niegsch, Jr., the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr.
-------------------------------------
William C. Niegsch, Jr.
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

March 30, 2006

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.


                                                                              25
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 159 (Friday, August 17, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46144-46145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4042]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 199

[DOD-2007-HA-0048]
RIN 0720-AB16


TRICARE; Outpatient Hospital Prospective Payment System (OPPS)

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DoD.

ACTION:  Interim final rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 14, 2007, the Department of Defense published an 
interim final rule on TRICARE; Outpatient Hospital Prospective Payment 
System (OPPS) in error at 72 FR 45359. The rule has not been approved 
for publication and cannot take effect. This document withdraws that 
rule.

DATES: Effective Date: The interim final rule amending 32 CFR Part 199, 
published on August 14, 2007 (72 FR 45359) is withdrawn effective 
August 17, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: L.M. Bynum 703-696-4970.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199

    Claims, Dental health, Health care, Health insurance, Individuals 
with disabilities, Military personnel.

0
The interim rule published on August 14, 2007 amending 32 CFR part 199 
is hereby withdrawn.


[[Page 46145]]


    Dated: August 14, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. 07-4042 Filed 8-14-07; 3:42 pm]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 173 (Friday, September 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 51445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4403]



[[Page 51445]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

HARRY S. TRUMAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Meeting of the Trustees and Officers of the 
Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation; September 18, 2007, 10 a.m.--12 
p.m., Rayburn House Office Building Room 2216

Agenda

I. Welcome and Opening Comments: President Albright
II. Approval of Minutes of Meeting of November 16, 2005
III. Report from the Executive Secretary
IV. Report on the 2006/2007 Truman Fellows Program
V. Approval of Budget for FY 2007
VI. Old Business
VII. New Business
VIII. Adjournment

Frederick G. Slabach,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-4403 Filed 9-4-07; 4:09 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-AD-P
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Hon. mYin Ii. mcwn, Jr. CJ3~!&nal.

DistriatAttorney Fort Jorth,Toxae

Dear Sir: OplnlonNo. O-1180

city orriaers e prieoner turne berore the werustice Court,
upon the above state& hi8 department. 8 0r Criminal Proaedun,; 8 shall be taxed fop a pulc t perfomed, or for a aerviee ly provided by law. 0pini0~ mio; 305s or thi8 dep43h44t ble 18 not entitled to a fee 0r TWO reading a warrant or arrest to a e matorist ire

in the cnsltody

and under ay Patrolmax&

and that a oonstableis ree r0r surmemain

g witnesses unleseha act*aally

sumoned sucrh

wltnessea. We are enolaaing, herewith,a 00~7 or oanferenee opinion No. 9068 0r this ilepartrmlt.

This department&as repeatedly ruled that 401~ stables,and other pea&e eiiloars,are only entitle&toaoileotrsas for %ervloeea0tuaU.yperform& Eieespinio~e Nom O-106 mid G-768 of this despartzlsnt. Alao see opl~lan written by Eon. Leon 0. kasee, AssietuitAt&- ney G%mral dated @amh 5, 19%, addreeeed to Hon. Wltm Grear Al, **County** Attorney, Gi&mt, Texm$ also 444 0pllaioR

0r thla d4partr;ent Wx~ttM by &xi. iroe **sharp,** Aaslstant Attorney General, dated Jun4 14, 1934,addresea& **to** HOR. LO. Osborn,County Attorney,Cmton, T%x%a.

IOU nre, thererore,t%sp%Otitily advisedthat it,ia the 0phion 0r this dbpartnant th4t your qua4ttiaa shi.aU be anstmwd in the n4gtMve.

Tru3tlIq that this anawBr8 your **inquiry,** a. are V%rftruly **rour4**

AppROlQJl JUL 31, 1939
**Exhibit 10.ooo**

 

Adoptedby the Benefits Committee

ofCinergy Corp. on December 16, 2003

 

 

**AMENDMENT TO THE**

**CINERGY CORP. EXCESS PENSION PLAN**

 

The Cinergy Corp. ExcessPension Plan, as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 1998, and asamended from time to time (the “Plan”), is hereby amended effective forcompensation received on or after January 1, 2004.

**(1)           Explanationof Amendment**

 

The Plan is amended toprovide that the benefits under the Plan shall be calculated with a cap on theamount of any bonus received on or after January 1, 2004 that will be includedin eligible earnings for employees in the Cinergy Corp. Commercial BusinessUnit (formerly known as the Energy Merchant Business Unit).

 

**(2)           Amendment**

 

                                                  Article 4 ofthe Plan is hereby amended by adding the following at the end thereof:

 

                                                  “Effective withrespect to amounts received on or after January 1, 2004, notwithstanding anyother provision of the Plan, for purposes of calculating the Maximum Benefitand Unrestricted Benefit of any Participant who is an employee in theCommercial Business Unit: (i) the amount of the Annual Performance Cash Award(as defined in Cinergy’s Pension Plan) that is to be taken into account underCinergy’s Pension Plan for a Plan Year shall not exceed the Participant’s rateof annual Base Salary or Base Wage (as those terms are defined in Cinergy’sPension Plan), as applicable, as of the last day of the performance period forwhich the Annual Performance Cash Award (as defined in Cinergy’s Pension Plan)is calculated and (ii) for purposes of clarity, any amount payable under theCommercial Business Unit Annual Incentive Plan (formerly known as the EnergyMerchant Business Unit Annual Incentive Plan) or any other annual incentiveplan maintained by the Commercial Business Unit that is automatically deferreduntil a subsequent Plan Year shall not be considered as part of theParticipant’s Annual Performance Cash Award (as defined in Cinergy’s PensionPlan), provided, however, that the limitations contained in thissentence shall not apply to amounts payable under the Cinergy Corp. AnnualIncentive Plan.”

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CinergyCorp. has caused this Amendment to be executed and approved by its dulyauthorized officer as of the date set forth above.

 
|   |   |   |   | By:    | /s/  Timothy J. Verhagen      |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |   |   | Timothy J. Verhagen                |
|   |   |   |   |   | Vice President of Human  Resources |

 

 

 

 

----
#### § 236.314 Electric lock for hand-operated switch or derail.

Electric lock shall be provided for each hand-operated switch or derail within interlocking limits, except where train movements are made at not exceeding 20 miles per hour. At manually operated interlocking it shall be controlled by operator of the machine and shall be unlocked only after signals governing movements over such switch or derail display aspects indicating stop. Approach or time locking shall be provided.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE RELATED
FORM 10-K FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000020947
<NAME> THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    4,743,067
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    242,200
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         497,641
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     1,394,623
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,877,531
<COMMON>                                     1,242,123
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       78,618
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          (276,458)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,044,283
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          186,118
<PREFERRED>                                    238,325
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,441,215
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             111,618
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  115,160
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       29,508
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     73,947
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                51,592
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,585,765
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                6,877,531
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,789,961
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            75,227
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,356,114
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,431,341
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        358,620
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (2,089)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 356,531
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       239,978
<NET-INCOME>                                   116,553
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     38,743
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   77,810
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       160,816
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      208,840
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         517,836
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 31, 1995 (137), Para 137.32 Deletions of Sponsors from Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1822]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.137.32  deletions of sponsors from public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were deleted from public bills 
and resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 359: Mr. Poshard.

```
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

 

(1)   Theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period endedApril 30, 2003, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  June 13, 2003 |                     |
|--------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                           |                     |
| /s/ Joseph  C. Christenson     |                     | /s/ Timothy  C. Clayton |   |
| Joseph C. Christenson          | Timothy C. Clayton       |
| President                      | Chief  Financial Officer |
|                                |                          |  |  |

 

----
LS Particle Size Analyzer 

 2 Apr 2012

File name:

File ID:

Sample ID:

Operator:

Optical model:

Residual:

LS 13 320

Start time:

Average Vacuum:

Obscuration:

Software:
 LS Particle Size Analyzer 

 2 Apr 2012
From: Carmen Vogl [mailto:CVogl@greenbergandrapp.com] 

Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 2:21 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: FW: per our discussion

Importance: High

Good afternoon,

After reading the below DISTURBING article I felt compelled to respond - being that I am a participant in 

my employers 401k plan. I thought this country was based on freedom of speech and the right to 

choose what suits our lifestyle and our plans for the future. I thought that this country was a 

democracy, but it appears that we are being robbed of our right to choose what is best for ourselves and 

our family. It started with the health care system and now filtering over into our retirement plan. When 

does it stop? When will the government start focusing on what really matters, like figuring out how to 

monitor the spending of government agencies, which has put this country in the hole that we are in 

today. As a result of the deficit we may not even have social security benefits available to us after all of 

the money we have paid into it over the years. Now that is something that the government should be 

sitting down to discuss - how to figure out ways to provide benefits to those who have been paying into 

the system for years. 

I truly hope that the below article does not come to fruition and that the powers that be step in and 

stop this madness from occurring. 

Regards,

Carmen Vogl

Executive Assistant to Ron Greenberg

Greenberg & Rapp Financial Group

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Ste 302

East Hanover, NJ 07936

(973) 434-8049 Phone

(973) 434-8171 Fax

The contents of this email and any attachments included are designed to convey accurate and authoritative information concerning the 

subject matter covered. However, they are provided with the understanding that neither Greenberg & Rapp Financial Group, Inc., nor its 

Representatives, guarantee their accuracy nor engage in the practice of law, or give legal or accounting advice. For advice and clarification 

in these areas please consult your appropriate advisors.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 246 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 246

              To repeal the Service Contract Act of 1965.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

Mr. Fawell (for himself, Mr. Ballenger, and Mr. Boehner) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Economic and 
                       Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To repeal the Service Contract Act of 1965.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL.

    The Service Contract Act of 1965 (41 U.S.C. 351 et seq.) is 
repealed.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall not apply to a contract which 
was entered into before the date of the enactment of this Act and to 
which the Service Contract Act of 1965 applied.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, November 7, 1995 (141), Para 141.25 H.J. Res. 111--Unfinished Business]
[Page 1877]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.141.25  h.j. res. 111--unfinished business

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced the further unfinished business to be the motion to suspend 
the rules and pass the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 111) providing for 
the appointment of Ann D'Harnoncourt as a citizen regent of the Board of 
Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
  The question being put,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said joint resolution?
  The vote was taken by electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

389

affirmative

Nays

0
```
#### § 29.702 What happens if the Department of the Interior determines that it provides the transportation services the Tribe intends to retrocede?

If the Department of the Interior determines that it provides the transportation services the Tribe intends to retrocede, the Department will notify the Tribe. The Tribe must return all remaining funds, less closeout costs, associated with those transportation services to the Department for transfer to the Department of the Interior.
-----Original Message----- 

From: losangelbear@aol.com [mailto:losangelbear@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:50 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Walter Schlosser 

725 1/2 Lorraine Blvd 

Los Angeles, CA 90005