alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/18/15 9:24 PM

Received: July 16, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k09-7p3h

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2452

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Stewart Engelman

Address: 

9 Cranwell Avenue

South Burlington, VT, 05403

Email: stuengelman@comcast.net

Phone: 8026581732

General Comment

I am strongly opposed to this proposed rule. While breaches of fiduciary duty by financial 

advisers can and should be prosecuted, pure asset custodians are merely order takers who buy, 

hold, and sell client assets without offering advice. EBSA's stated theory that pure asset 

custodians are advisory fiduciaries is a hoax to enable the federal government to force IRA 

account holders invest a certain minimum percentage of their assets in US Treasury securities, 

creating an artificial demand for these bonds to partially diminish the increase in federal debt 

servicing costs that will inevitably occur after the Federal Reserve begins to raise short term 

interest rates to try to create a "soft landing" for precarious bubbles in the stock, bond, and 

housing markets. If the federal government truly wishes to minimize the cost of servicing the 

federal debt, it should devolve all federal social programs to the States (such as Social Security, 

Medicare, and Medicaid), summarily revoke full faith credit backing for all federal agency bonds 

not explicitly containing such a promise in their prospectus or indenture document, and vacate all 

federal regulatory agencies. Each of the devolutions, revocations, and vacate actions advised are 
Constitutionally mandatory anyway, because these federal powers and programs are not 

enumerated in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution - they are mainly powers arrogated by the 

federal government from the States. The end result of the proposed actions would be summary 

abrogation of almost the entirety of the federal off balance sheet debt, and an annual $2-$3 

trillion current account surplus that can be used to pay off the official federal debt over a 

generation or so, materially bolster our cratered defense spending, and finance a reduction in 

federal marginal tax rates.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A.
Morrissey, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ John A. Morrissey
-------------------------------------
Name: John A. Morrissey
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 30, 2006
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2262

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building

bama, as the ‘‘Holk Post Office Building’’.located at 218 North Alston Street in Foley, Ala-
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2262

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building located

at 218 North Alston Street in Foley, Alabama, as the

‘‘Holk Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2262 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States Post Office building located at 218

3 North Alston Street in Foley, Alabama, shall be known

4 and designated as the ‘‘Holk Post Office Building’’.

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

8 States Post Office building referred to in section 1 shall

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Holk Post Office

10 Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 19,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 299.507 Program of instruction on operating rules; recordkeeping. ( a ) To ensure that each railroad employee whose activities are governed by the railroad's operating rules understands those rules, the railroad periodically shall instruct each such employee on the meaning and application of its operating rules with a written program developed under § 299.13(c)(3) and retained at its system headquarters.
( b ) Prior to commencing operations, the railroad shall file and retain one copy of its current program for the periodic instruction of its employees as required by paragraph (a) of this section and shall file and retain one copy of any amendment to that program as amendments are made. These records shall be retained at the railroad's system headquarters for one calendar year after the end of the calendar year to which they relate. These records shall be made available to representatives of the FRA for inspection and copying during normal business hours. This program shall— ( 1 ) Describe the means and procedures used for instruction of the various classes of affected employees;
( 2 ) State the frequency of instruction and the basis for determining that frequency;
( 3 ) Include a schedule for completing the initial instruction of employees who are already employed when the program begins;
( 4 ) Begin on the date of commencing operations; and
( 5 ) Provide for initial instruction of each employee hired after the program begins.
( c ) The railroad is authorized to retain by electronic recordkeeping its program for periodic instruction of its employees on operating rules, provided that the requirements stated in § 299.11 are satisfied.
§ 271.15 Voluntary compliance. ( a ) *General.* A railroad not otherwise subject to this part may voluntarily comply by establishing and fully implementing an RRP meeting the requirements of this part. A voluntary RRP shall be supported by an RRP plan that has been submitted to FRA for approval pursuant to the requirements of subpart D of this part. After FRA has approved its RRP plan, a voluntarily-compliant railroad that fails to comply with the requirements of this part is subject to civil penalties or other FRA enforcement action.
( b ) *Duration.* A voluntarily-compliant railroad will be required to comply with the requirements of this part for a minimum period of five years, running from the date on which FRA approves the railroad's plan pursuant to subpart D of this part.
( c ) *Notification to discontinue compliance.* After this five-year period, a voluntarily-compliant railroad may discontinue compliance with this part by providing written notice to the FRA Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety and Chief Safety Officer, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
( d ) *Discovery and admission as evidence of certain information.* The information protection provisions in § 271.11 apply to information compiled or collected pursuant to a voluntary RRP that is conducted in accordance with the requirements of this part and as provided by § 271.301(b)(4)(ii).
From: robert_englehart@comcast.net 

[mailto:robert_englehart@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:38 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

bob englehart 

p.o. box 1233 

auburn, WA 98071
-----Original Message----- 

From: caatkinson@hotmail.com [mailto:caatkinson@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:23 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

c atkinson 

300 NC Hwy 54, C5 

Carrboro, NC 27510
UAV Flight Test

☐ Assemble UAV and prepare for take o ff ☐ Take o ff successfully ☐ Raise UAV to 50 feet and hover ☐ Move the UAV forward 20 feet ☐ Move the UAV backward 20 feet ☐ Move the UAV left 20 feet ☐ Move the UAV right 20 feet ☐ Initiate return to home in emergency ☐ Land UAV ☐ Explain buttons/controls on the remote ☐ Disassemble UAV and store ☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification Pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350)





The undersigned, as the chief financial
officer of PAB Bankshares, Inc., certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, which
accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of PAB Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for
the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall
not be relied upon for any other purpose.





Dated this 9th day of November,
2009.





/s/ Nicole S.
      StokesNicole
      S. StokesExecutive
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
PAB Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by PAB Bankshares, Inc. and furnished
to the SEC or its staff upon request.
----

| EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002             In connection with the Annual Report of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Lawrence J. Reilly, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:             (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and             (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Lawrence J. Reilly           Lawrence J. ReillyChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)April 30, 2012 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Central Vermont Public Service Corporation ("CVPS") and will be retained by CVPS and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### § 236.766 Locking, movable bridge.

The rail locks, bridge locks, bolt locks, circuit controllers, and electric locks used in providing interlocking protection at a movable bridge.
#### Bolton Hall and others, *Appellants, v.*The United States Reflector Company, *Respondent.*

— Motion for resettlement denied.
Filed 5/1/01 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2001 ND 77

Debra L. Yantzer, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

David G. Yantzer, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20000324

Appeal from the District Court of Oliver County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Robert O. Wefald, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Dennis W. Lindquist, 303 1st St. NE, P.O. Box 490, Mandan, N.D. 58554, for defendant and appellant.

Anthony J. Weiler, Wheeler Wolf, 220 N. 4th St., P.O. Box 2056, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2056, for plaintiff and appellee.

Yantzer v. Yantzer

No. 20000324

Per Curiam.

[¶1]David Yantzer appeals from an Order denying his motion for change of custody of the parties’ child.  Yantzer argues the trial court erred in finding no material change of circumstances.  A party seeking modification of a custody order bears the burden of showing a material change of circumstances exists requiring a change of custody.  Krizan v. Krizan, 1998 ND 186, ¶ 4, 585 N.W.2d 576.  “A trial court’s decision to modify custody is a finding of fact subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review.”  Hendrickson v. Hendrickson, 2000 ND 1, ¶ 16, 603 N.W.2d 896.  We conclude the trial court did not err in finding there was no material change of circumstances requiring a change of custody.  We summarily affirm under Rule 35.1(a)(2), N.D.R.App.P.

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

William A. Neumann
Exhibit 4





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul O. Richins, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Paul O. Richins


Paul O. Richins


Principal Financial Officer


November 4, 2010








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 26.105 What enforcement actions apply in FAA programs? ( a ) Compliance with all requirements of this part by airport sponsors and other recipients of FAA financial assistance is enforced through the procedures of Title 49 of the United States Code, including 49 U.S.C. 47106(d), 47111(d), and 47122, and regulations implementing them.
( b ) The provisions of § 26.103(b) and this section apply to enforcement actions in FAA programs.
( c ) Any person who knows of a violation of this part by a recipient of FAA funds may file a complaint under 14 CFR part 16 with the Federal Aviation Administration Office of Chief Counsel.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No

. 201 600262

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v. 

### KANDI M. KOEDEL Lance Corporal (E

- 3 ), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________ App eal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Major Michael D. Zimmerman
, USMC

. For Appellant : Lieutenant Commander Derek C. Hampton
, JAGC, USN

. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ Decided 22 Septem ber 2016

_________________________ Before CAMPBELL , RUGH and HUTCHISON
, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved b y the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
§ 29.306 What is the duration of a funding agreement? ( a ) The duration of a funding agreement is one year unless the Department and a Tribe negotiate a multi-year funding agreement or, for an initial funding agreement, a partial-year agreement.
( b ) Each funding agreement will remain in full force and effect until the Department and the Tribe execute a subsequent funding agreement, except when: ( 1 ) The Tribe provides notice to the Department that it is withdrawing or retroceding funds for the operation of one or more PSFAs (or portions thereof) identified in the funding agreement;
( 2 ) The Department terminates the funding agreement under 23 U.S.C. 207(f)(2); or
( 3 ) The Department and the Tribe agree otherwise.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 145 (Monday, July 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 41509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3688]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 
Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition to the Special 
Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice 
of a decision to designate a class of employees at the Los Alamos 
National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, as an addition to the 
Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational 
Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On June 22, 2007, the 
Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an 
addition to the SEC:

    Employees of the Department of Energy (DOE), its predecessor 
agencies, or DOE contractors or subcontractors who were monitored or 
should have been monitored for radiological exposures while working 
in operational Technical Areas with a history of radioactive 
material use at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) for a 
number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days from March 
15, 1943 through December 31, 1975, or in combination with work days 
within the parameters established for one or more other classes of 
employees in the Special Exposure Cohort.

    This designation will become effective on July 22, 2007, unless 
Congress provides otherwise prior to the effective date. After this 
effective date, HHS will publish a notice in the Federal Register 
reporting the addition of this class to the SEC or the result of any 
provision by Congress regarding the decision by HHS to add the class to 
the SEC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Elliott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, 
OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6f202c2e3c2f2c2b2c41282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="337c707260737077701d747c65">[email protected]</span></a>.

John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 07-3688 Filed 7-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-17-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 232.107 Air source requirements and cold weather operations. ( a ) *Monitoring plans for yard air sources.* ( 1 ) A railroad shall adopt and comply with a written plan to monitor all yard air sources, other than locomotives, to determine that they operate as intended and do not introduce contaminants into the brake system of freight equipment.
( 2 ) This plan shall require the railroad to: ( i ) Inspect each yard air source at least two times per calendar year, no less than five months apart, to determine it operates as intended and does not introduce contaminants into the brake system of the equipment it services.
( ii ) Identify yard air sources found not to be operating as intended or found introducing contaminants into the brake system of the equipment it services.
( iii ) Repair or take other remedial action regarding any yard air source identified under paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section.
( 3 ) A railroad shall maintain records of the information and actions required by paragraph (a)(2). These records shall be maintained for a period of at least one year from the date of creation and may be maintained either electronically or in writing.
( b ) Condensation and other contaminants shall be blown from the pipe or hose from which compressed air is taken prior to connecting the yard air line or motive power to the train.
( c ) No chemicals which are known to degrade or harm brake system components shall be placed in the train air brake system.
( d ) Yard air reservoirs shall either be equipped with an operable automatic drain system or be manually drained at least once each day that the devices are used or more often if moisture is detected in the system.
( e ) A railroad shall adopt and comply with detailed written operating procedures tailored to the equipment and territory of that railroad to cover safe train operations during cold weather. For purposes of this provision, “cold weather” means when the ambient temperature drops below 10 degrees Fahrenheit (F) (minus 12.2 degrees Celsius).