alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                           CLARCOR INC. SUBSIDIARIES
 
                            AS OF FEBRUARY 18, 1998
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        JURISDICTION OF
                                                        INCORPORATION OR                    PERCENT OF
                NAME                                      ORGANIZATION                      OWNERSHIP
------------------------------------                    ----------------                    ----------
<S>                                                     <C>                                 <C>
CLARCOR Consumer Products, Inc.                         Delaware                               100%
  J.L. Clark, Inc.                                      Delaware                               100%
  Clark Europe, Inc.                                    Delaware                               100%
CLARCOR Filtration Products, Inc.                       Delaware                               100%
  Airguard Industries, Inc.                             Kentucky                               100%
     Airklean Engineering Pte. Ltd.                     Singapore                              100%
     Airguard Asia Sdn. Bhd.                            Malaysia                               100%
  Baldwin Filters, Inc.                                 Delaware                               100%
     Baldwin Filters N.V.                               Belgium                                100%*
     Baldwin Filters Limited                            United Kingdom                         100%*
     Baldwin South Africa, Inc.                         Delaware                               100%
       Baldwin-Unifil S.A.                              South Africa                            70%
     Hastings Filters, Inc.                             Delaware                               100%
       Hastings Filters Ltd. Canada                     Canada                                 100%
  Baldwin Filters (Aust.) Pty.
     Limited                                            Australia                               50%
  Clark Filter, Inc.                                    Delaware                               100%
  Filtros Baldwin de Mexico                             Mexico                                  90%
United Air Specialists, Inc.                            Ohio                                   100%
  United Air Specialists (U.K.) Ltd.                    United Kingdom                         100%
CLARCOR International, Inc.                             Delaware                               100%
  Baldwin-Weifang Filters Ltd.                          China                                   70%
CLARCOR Foreign Sales Corporation                       Virgin Islands                         100%
CLARCOR Trading Company                                 Delaware                               100%*
</TABLE>
 
------------------------------
* Direct or indirect
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Sterling Gas Drilling Fund 1982 (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles E. Drimal Jr.,  Chief Executive Officer of PrimeEnergy Management Corporation, the Managing General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

/s/ Charles E. Drimal Jr.

-----------------------------

Chief Executive Officer

May 13, 2003

 

 

EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Sterling Gas Drilling Fund 1982 (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Beverly A. Cummings, Chief Financial Officer of PrimeEnergy Management Corporation, the Managing General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

/s/ Beverly A. Cummings

------------------------------

Chief Financial Officer

May 13, 2003
#### § 209.131 Criminal penalties generally.

A person who knowingly violates 49 U.S.C. 5104(b) or § 171.2(l) of this title or willfully or recklessly violates a requirement of the Federal hazardous material transportation law or a regulation, order, special permit, or approval issued thereunder shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both, except the maximum amount of imprisonment shall be 10 years in any case in which the violation involves the release of a hazardous material which results in death or bodily injury to any person.

[71 FR 77295, Dec. 26, 2006]
#### Robie *v.*Chapman *& a.*

A husband may have an estate by the curtesy in land conveyed by him as a gift to his wife, which may be taken on execution by his creditors.

Writ op Entry. Facts agreed. September 2, 1869, William F. Chapman, one of the defendants, being the owner of the demanded premises, conveyed them to his daughter, who at the same time, and as part of the same transaction, conveyed them to the other defendant, Fanny J. Chapman, who was then and is now the wife of said William F. Chapman. The conveyances were without consideration. The plaintiff claims a freehold interest in the demanded premises during the life of William F. Chapman, under a levy of an execution issued on a judgment recovered against him February 16, 1876.

*Wiggin Fernald,*for the plaintiff.

*O. S.*Smith, for the defendants.

Clark, J.

The plaintiff has a valid title, unless the land levied upon is held by the wife to her sole and separate Lise. It cannot be so held, because she acquired her title by gift from her husband. Gen. St., c. 164, s. 1; *Voght*v. Ticknor, 48 N. H. 242. By the common law, William F. Chapman has a life estate as tenant by the curtesy in the lands of his wife, and his interest may be taken on execution.

*Judgment for the plaintiff.*

Foster, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, October 19, 1995 (131), Para 131.26 Private Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1570]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.131.26  private bills and resolutions

  Under clause 1 of rule XXII, private bills and resolutions were 
introduced and severally referred as follows:

           By Mr. BRYANT of Tennessee:
       H.R. 2515. A bill for the relief of Florence Barrett Cox; 
     to the Committee on the Judiciary.
           By Mr. UNDERWOOD:
       H.R. 2516. A bill for the relief of Vincente Babauta Jesus 
     and Rita Rios Jesus; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
```
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0694 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Stephen Curtis 

Address: 

Bloomington, IN, 

Organization: Private Practice 

General Comment 

To anyone truly interested in improving addictions treatment: 

I have been using neurofeedback and/or CES (cranial electrotherapy stimulation) in combination with 

visualizations of new behaviors to treat addictions and am having tremendous success. Even long 

term poly substance abusers are having success in maintaining their sobriety - but they are doing this 

so that they can move more effectively toward their long term, life goals (that they are visualilzing 

multiple times each day). 

This treatment strategy is based on the finding of Elmer Green and Steve Fahrion at Meninger Clinic 

in the early 90's. It was extremely effective then and continues to be the most effective treatment 

currently available. I have used it successfully for many different addictions (food, alcohol, 

amphetamines, marijuana, cocaine, benzodiazepines, etc.) and it is very effective and reliable. 

Neurofeedback (brainwave biofeedback) and CES (microcurrent passed between earclips on the 

earlobes) are clearly not traditional pharmaceutical or 12 step programs and traditional medicine. But 

gradually the efficacies of these treatments are leading to some wider acceptance. 

Big Pharma, however, will fight these methods - because they are also effective for depression, ADD, 

anxiety, fibromyalgia, pain, insomnia, PTSD, and the whole variety of other presentations that are 

exacerbated by anxiety. 

Big Pharma is still 'taking everyone's lunch money' and will aggressively fight treatments that do not 

come in a prescription bottle. 

Help put this 'bully' in its place - vote for the increased availability of these new and effective 

treatments for addiction! 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 03, 2010 

Received: May 03, 2010 

Status: DoNotPost 

Tracking No. 80ae59fa 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 2

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 5/3/2010
Page 2 of 2

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 5/3/2010
§ 220.33 Receiving a radio transmission. ( a ) Upon receiving a radio call, an employee shall promptly acknowledge the call, identifying the employee's station in accordance with the requirements of § 220.27 and stand by to receive. An employee need not attend the radio during the time that this would interfere with other immediate duties relating to the safety of railroad operations.
( b ) An employee who receives a transmission shall repeat it to the transmitting party unless the communication: ( 1 ) Relates to yard switching operations;
( 2 ) Is a recorded message from an automatic alarm device; or
( 3 ) Is general in nature and does not contain any information, instruction or advice which could affect the safety of a railroad operation.
# ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Cause No.DA 20-0021 IN THE MATTTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP AND CONSERVATORSHIP OF, A.M. M., Alleged Incapacitated Person. ORDER FOR EXTENSION

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF Upon consideration ofPetitioner's Motion for Extension ofTime to File Opening Brief, and good cause appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for 30 day Extension is GRANTED and Opening Briefis now due on April 15,2020. DATED this day ofMarch,202
1 03/04/2020 Case Number: DA 20-0021
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 29, 1995 (123), Para 123.42 Time Limitation of Referred Bill]
[Page 1492]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.123.42  time limitation of referred bill

  Pursuant to clause 5 of rule X the following action was taken by the 
Speaker.

       H.R. 1816. Referral to the Committee on Commerce extended 
     for a period ending not later than November 1, 1995.
```
§ 236.339 Mechanical locking, maintenance requirements. Locking and connections shall be maintained so that, when a lever or latch is mechanically locked the following will be prevented: ( a ) *Mechanical machine* — ( 1 ) *Latch-operated locking.* Raising lever latch block so that bottom thereof is within three-eighths inch of top of quadrant.
( 2 ) *Lever-operated locking.* Moving lever latch block more than three-eighths inch on top of quadrant.
( b ) *Electromechanical machine* — ( 1 ) *Lever moving in horizontal plant.* Moving lever more than five-sixteenths inch when in normal position or more than nine-sixteenths inch when in reverse position.
( 2 ) *Lever moving in arc.* Moving lever more than 5 degrees.
( c ) *Power machine* — ( 1 ) *Latch-operated locking.* Raising lever latch block to that bottom thereof is within seven thirty-seconds inch of top of quadrant.
( 2 ) *Lever moving in horizontal plane.* Moving lever more than five-sixteenths inch when in normal position or more than nine-sixteenths inch when in reverse position.
( 3 ) *Lever moving in arc.* Moving lever more than 5 degrees.
-----Original Message----- 

From: vikmo@yahoo.com [mailto:vikmo@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 8:51 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Vicky Metternich 

20 Colby Rd. 

West Roxbury, MA 02132
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         573,986
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,074,675
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,648,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,188
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,031,618
<OTHER-SE>                                     392,145
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,648,661
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,333
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  204,194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (165,861)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (165,861)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (165,861)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: lbabb7@att.net [mailto:lbabb7@att.net] 

Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 5:07 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 30, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Linda Babb 

800 W. 223rd St., Unit 7 

Torrance, CA 90502
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED March 23, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-60474 Summary Calendar

KILOCHO MALUMALU AHMED, Petitioner,

versus JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A79 105 455

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Kilocho Malumalu Ahmed petitions this court for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and withholding of removal under the provisions of the Convention Against Torture. When, as here, the BIA summarily affirms without opinion and essentially adopts the IJ’s decision, we review the IJ’s decision. See Mikhael v. INS , 115 F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997).No. 03-60474 -2- Because Ahmed’s brief does not address the IJ’s findings on withholding of removal or withholding under the provisions of the Convention Against Torture, we do not review them. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft , 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir. 2003). Ahmed argues that the IJ erred in determining that he did not have a well-founded fear of persecution based on his past membership in a now-defunct political party and his refusal to join the Congolese military. Based upon our review of the record, we conclude that the IJ’s ultimate determination is supported by substantial evidence and is reasonable. See Ontunez-Tursios v. Ashcroft , 303 F.3d 341, 350 (5th Cir. 2002). Ahmed has not shown that the evidence compels a finding that he would face persecution on a protected ground. See Girma v. INS , 283 F.3d 664, 667, 669 (5th Cir. 2002); 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A) (a refugee is unwilling or unable to return because of persecution “on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion”). The petition for review is DENIED.
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable Vi. I;. JlcClain 

Criminal Dietriot Attorney 

Georgetown, Texae 

Dear Sir: 

WI have reoeived 

wo quote in part as follow 

fng questions 

eleoted aa a 

recent date whioh 

the f6lloruld ltk6 to hare 

sentenoe diequalify a 

any aleotfon, lshether 

e or National sleotlon?~.n 

2 of Artiola XVI 02 the Conetitutian of 

Texas prOVideI a8 folloy6~1 

*Laws shall be made 66 sxolude fro&a offloe, 

BerVhg On jUrtf#sF Nid froI$ $&a right Of mffrags; thoee who lMy haye besa or ahall hemafter bh aonricted or robberp; perjury, fOr&tlry, 

or other high ar3qr. . i* 
i3oawrUo iL I. XoOlmln, Paw 8 
.,I,. 

;, p,norable Vi. K. NoClaln, Paeo 3 

*what does the oourt mean by thlm language? 

clearly that If tha Su6penQeQ S8DtwmI &r Qefaat6 

or nulllfle6 or oonillat6 with S*otlon E of AHA010 XVI of the constitution, it WQuld be void. 

~1s oonillot, l ooording to the court, would result If a porron rho 18 the rmlplent of a l u6- 

ponded sentonoa rorild not 6tifer the dirabillty 

pronounood by this provision of the Co66titUti~. 

III other words, aa applied to Seotlon E of Utlale 16 of ths Con6tltutlon, if besawo of anQ 

undrr the auspendmd rontenoa law a person oould 

hold office, 8erv6 on jurI66, and vote, notmithstanding hl6 having been adjudged gufltr of the 

orlmos msntlonsd, broausa hi6 6rnteabo had beon 

su6pOlldO&,TiOUbi not the eff*Ot Of th 6U6QOnQbQ 

rehtrnor law be to QUoat the purporr.o$ tha Oon6tltution? * i .Wiwoar, if the mrd *eonvlbt6di In 

Section 2 of Artfale 16 of the Con6tltutlon be 

held to rae~~tbm l oertaimmnt ~anQ publle6tion 

of guilt, rather than a final aodrletloa, the dirabilltle6 progounP66 by th6 Coartltutlon wrould be 

suffered and the l plrlt and purpose of 'Seotion Z 

of Artiolo la 16 ~aot violated by the s~6pendoQ '. 

sentenoe lan.m 

me ~MUOS in701~0d ~II pour queri06 WC&S itin 

1~. ~lrou8ml, a nd l uthorltle6 thereon wore ~,urtod, in opin- 

: ba l?o. O-8698, uM we .oaolo’ao a aopt of said oplhlon for 

tdur con6IUeratlon. 

In vlon of the above olted oon6,tltutlonal an4 otatntory &ovlsions aad ~tha priao~pler aahuaiwd ia Opinion No. 

be698, w4 are ooastr~aed to hold that a pw6Oa who 16 oondOted or murder anil: given a rira year l unpdl4od 88ntenoe 

Fhioh I6 #till in foroe m4 Urud Im not auaflfIa4 either 

TV hold th. ofilos of tN6tWJ of a 

to exercise the right of 6tifrqw. 

0aumQa &&001 dirtriot or 

Very truly your6
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 21, 1995 (119), Para 119.10 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 1170]
[Page 1446]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.119.10  providing for the consideration of h.r. 1170

  Mr. SOLOMON, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. 
No. 104-257) the resolution (H. Res. 227) providing for the 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 1170) to provide that cases challenging 
the constitutionality of measures passed by State referendum be heard by 
a 3-judge court.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
#### The People of the state of New York *ex rel.*Henry D. Nicoll, Appellant, v. The New York Infant Asylum, Respondent.

Order directing alternative *mandamus*affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of

well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the

public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that

Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10368

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

THOMAS EDWARD BUTLER,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:94-CR-183-G

- - - - - - - - - -

December 20, 1995

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant argues that the district court erred in increasing

his base offense level for obstruction of justice and in allowing

the introduction of evidence of his prior conviction for

impeachment purposes. We have reviewed the record and the briefs

and find no reversible error.

 AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23


                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors Lab Holdings, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(No. 333-78593) on Form S-8 of Lab Holdings, Inc. of our report dated
March 8, 1999 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Lab
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive
income, stockholders' equity and cash flows and related schedule for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998,
which report appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form
10-K of Lab Holdings, Inc.



                                KPMG LLP



Kansas City, Missouri
June 17, 1999