alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, October 18, 1995 (130), Para 130.32 Leave of Absence]
[Page 1552]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.130.32  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted to Mr. VOLKMER, for 
after 1:30 p.m. today.
  And then,
```
#### Margaret Moore, Executrix, etc., and another, Plaintiffs, v. The City of Albany, Defendant.

—Judgment ordered for defendant. Opinion

by

Learned, P. J.;

Bockes, J..-dissenting in opinion that plaintiff recover $690.78 and interest.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOn a class of unsteady three-dimensional Navier Stokes solutions relevant to rotating disc flows: Threshold amplitudes and finite time singularitiesA class of exact steady and unsteady solutions of the Navier Stokes equations in cylindrical polar coordinates is given. The flows correspond to the motion induced by an infinite disc rotating with constant angular velocity about the z-axis in a fluid occupying a semi-infinite region which, at large distances from the disc, has velocity field proportional to (x,-y,O) with respect to a Cartesian coordinate system. It is shown that when the rate of rotation is large, Karman's exact solution for a disc rotating in an otherwise motionless fluid is recovered. In the limit of zero rotation rate a particular form of Howarth's exact solution for three-dimensional stagnation point flow is obtained. The unsteady form of the partial differential system describing this class of flow may be generalized to time-periodic equilibrium flows. In addition the unsteady equations are shown to describe a strongly nonlinear instability of Karman's rotating disc flow. It is shown that sufficiently large perturbations lead to a finite time breakdown of that flow whilst smaller disturbances decay to zero. If the stagnation point flow at infinity is sufficiently strong, the steady basic states become linearly unstable. In fact there is then a continuous spectrum of unstable eigenvalues of the stability equations but, if the initial value problem is considered, it is found that, at large values of time, the continuous spectrum leads to a velocity field growing exponentially in time with an amplitude decaying algebraically in time.Document ID19910006678Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsHall, Philip*(Manchester Univ. (England). Hampton, VA., United States)*Balakumar, P.*(High Technology Corp.)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1990Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberICASE-90-86NASA-CR-187482NAS 1.26:187482AD-A231564Accession Number91N15991Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18605Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910006678.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
-----Original Message----- 

From: dlwiebe@gmail.com [mailto:dlwiebe@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:42 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lorma Wiebe 

2411 Cottonmill Ave 

Kearney, NE 68845
§ 1554.1 Scope. ( a ) This part applies to repair stations that are certificated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) pursuant to 14 CFR part 145, except for a part 145 certificated repair station located on a U.S. or foreign government military installation.
( b ) In addition to the terms in 49 CFR 1500.3 and 1540.5, for purposes of this part, “large aircraft” means any aircraft with a maximum certificated takeoff weight of more than 12,500 pounds and “attended” aircraft means an aircraft to which access is limited to authorized individuals and property.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

GREGORY BROWN JR., 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 11 WM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2016, the Petition Requesting Extraordinary 

Relief Through the Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction is 

DENIED. 

Justice Donohue did not participate in the consideration or decision of this 

matter.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification Pursuant To

Rule 13A-14(a) or 15D-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael Wellesley-Wesley, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chyron Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) reserved - not effective;



c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.









Date: March 30, 2007







|/s/ Michael Wellesley-Wesley
|----------------------------
|Michael Wellesley-Wesley    
|President and               
|Chief Executive Officer
#### State *v.*Welch.

An action of debt may be maintained upon a recognizance to keep the peace, entered into before the police- court of Manchester, under Gen. St,, c. 238, s. 8, although the recognizance was not filed and made of record in the supreme court; otherwise if the action were *scire facias,*because in that form of proceeding the record must be in the same court from which the writ issues.

Debt, upon a recognizance to keep the peace and be of good behavior for one year, entered into before the police court of Manchester. The action was committed to a referee, who found that the condition of the recognizance had been forfeited. The defendant contended that the action could not be maintained, because the *135recognizance had not been returned to and made of record in the supreme court.

*Sulloway*Topliff,, for the defendant.

Smith, city solicitor, for the state.

Clark, J.

There is no statute requiring the recognizance to be returned to the supreme court. It was ordered and taken under Gen. St., *c.*238, *s.*8, which is as follows: “ Any person sentenced by a justice or court for any criminal offence, or ordered to recognize for his appearance before the same or another court, may be required to recognize to keep the peace and be of good behavior for such time as the court or justice may direct.” There is no provision for the return of the recognizance to the supreme court. The preceding sections of the same chapter relate to recognizances to keep the peace in other cases; and the section immediately preceding is as follows: “ Every recognizance taken in pursuance of the foregoing provisions shall be transmitted by the justice to the supreme court for the county, on or before the first day of the next trial term, and there filed with the clerk.” The section under which the recognizance in this case was taken follows that section, and is not included in its provisions.

The recognizance upon which this action is founded was entered into before a court of record, it was not taken on appeal, and there is no statute requiring it to be transmitted to the supreme court. It is not, therefore, necessary that it should have been returned to the supreme court and made a matter of record there, to render it valid. If this proceeding were *scire facias*instead of an action of debt, it would fail, because in that form of proceeding the record must be in the same court from which the writ issues. *State*v. *Kinne,*39 N. H. 129.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
#### § 230.68 Speed indicators.

Steam locomotives that operate at speeds in excess of 20 miles per hour over the general system of railroad transportation shall be equipped with speed indicators. Where equipped, speed indicators shall be maintained to ensure accurate functioning.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WALL STREET DELI, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                         611,343
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,726,887
<ALLOWANCES>                                   218,071
<INVENTORY>                                    683,852
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,771,907
<PP&E>                                      36,253,973
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,553,266
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,213,747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,897,023
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       170,740
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,145,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,213,747
<SALES>                                     47,640,411
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,640,411
<CGS>                                       43,238,761
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               43,238,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               218,071
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             155,189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (555,081)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (222,150)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (332,931)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (332,931)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.11)
        

</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2401

To provide for monthly payments by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to

certain children of veterans exposed to ionizing radiation while in military

service.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 27, 1995

Mr. HYDE (for himself and Mr. FAWELL) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To provide for monthly payments by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to certain children of veterans exposed to

ionizing radiation while in military service.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENTS TO CHILDREN OF RADIATION4 EXPOSED VETERANS.

5 (a) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs

6 shall pay to an individual described in subsection (b) a

7 monthly amount determined in the same manner as ap8 plies under chapter 11 of title 38, United States Code,

9 in the case of veterans with service-connected disabilities.
2

•HR 2401 IH

1 Payments under this section shall be made in the same

2 manner, and in accordance with the same procedures, as

3 apply to payments of compensation under such chapter.

4 (b) COVERED INDIVIDUALS.—This section applies to

5 any person—

6 (1) who is the biological child of an individual

7 who is a radiation-exposed veteran; and

8 (2) who has incurred a disease that (A) is a

9 statutory radiation-associated disease, or (B) is

10 specified in the regulations prescribed by the Sec11 retary under subsection (c)(2).

12 (c) DETERMINATION OF ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS IN

13 CHILDREN RELATED TO RADIATION EXPOSURE.—(1)

14 The Secretary shall determine for purposes of this section

15 those diseases (in addition to statutory radiation-associ16 ated diseases) with respect to which there is reason to be17 lieve that occurrence in a person may be attributable to

18 exposure to radiation of a biological parent of that person.

19 (2) The Secretary shall prescribe by regulation each

20 disease that the Secretary determines under paragraph

21 (1).

22 (d) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section:

23 (1) The term ‘‘radiation-exposed veteran’’ has

24 the meaning given such term in paragraph (3) of

25 section 1112(c) of title 38, United States Code.
3

•HR 2401 IH

1 (2) The term ‘‘statutory radiation-associated

2 disease’’ means a disease specified in paragraph (2)

3 of section 1112(c) of title 38, United States Code.

4 (e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—No payment may be made

5 under this section for any month before the month in

6 which this Act is enacted.

Æ
§ 230.54 Testing and maintenance. ( a ) *Testing.* All water glasses must be blown out, all gauge cocks must be tested, and all passages verified to be open at the beginning of each day the locomotive is used, and as often as necessary to ensure proper functioning.
( b ) *Maintenance.* Gauge cocks, water column drain valves, and water glass valves must be maintained in such condition that they can easily be opened and closed by hand, without the aid of a wrench or other tool.
§ 228.329 Housekeeping. ( a ) A camp car must be kept clean to the extent allowed by the nature of the work performed by the occupants of the camp car.
( b ) To facilitate cleaning, every floor, working place, and passageway must be kept free from protruding nails, splinters, loose boards, and unnecessary holes and openings.
From: Paul Mayhue [mailto:PaulM@TI-GR.com] 

Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 3:20 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA; Baum, Beth - EBSA 

Subject: Kent County Mental Health Parity Discussion Group-Comments on MHParity Act of 2008 

Importance: High

This document is presented by the Kent County Mental Health Parity Discussion Group. 

The information that is attached are the comments that represent a broad base of the, 

Local Political, Consumers, Behavioral and Mental Health Community Opinion in our Area. 

We can be contacted at 201 Sheldon St SE, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, 616-459-0255 

Extention 304 Greg Dziadosz, Extention 184 W. Paul Mayhue, Hank Fuhs 616-4379059, Paul 

Ippel 616-336-3765, Cyndy Viars 616-949-1100.

This message and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential information 

and is intended only for the entities named herein. If you are not the intended 

recipient, you are hereby notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any 

action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This 

message has been prepared using resources owned by Touchstone Innovare, Grand 

Rapids, Michigan.
#### § 236.526 Roadway element not functioning properly.

When a roadway element except track circuit of automatic train stop, train control or cab signal system is not functioning as intended, the signal associated with such roadway element shall be caused manually to display its most restrictive aspect until such element has been restored to normal operative condition.
-----Original Message----- 

From: nsreenan@ameritech.net [mailto:nsreenan@ameritech.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 5:11 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. 

In fact, why not just eliminate the mind-body distinction in health care 

totally? What purpose does it serve, other than to add bureaucracies on top 

of insurance bureaucracy? Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Nancy Sreenan 

2400 Park Place 

Evanston, IL 60201
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT

(401(K) PLAN)

 

 

	**AGREEMENT**, made this June 12, 1999, by and between Roger Henderson (hereinafter referred to as "Trustee"), and Chyron Corporation, a New York corporation with its principal offices at 5 Hub Drive, Melville, New York 11747.

	**WHEREAS**, the Trustee has agreed to provide his service to the Chyron Corp. 401(K) Plan, (the "Plan") provided that Chyron Corporation (the "Company") agrees to indemnify and hold it harmless for certain actions or inactions as Trustee; and

	**WHEREAS**, the Company has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the Trustee for certain actions or inactions as Trustee.

	**NOW, THEREFORE**, the parties agree as follows:

	1.	To the maximum extent permitted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and by other applicable Federal or state law, the Trustee shall not be liable for (either jointly or severally), and the Company shall indemnify the Trustee against, and agree to hold the Trustee harmless from, any and all liabilities and claims (including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses in defending against such liabilities and claims) against the Trustee arising from any action or inaction of the Trustee with respect to the Plan, unless such liability or expense results from grossly negligent or willful acts of commission or omission by the Trustee.  The foregoing indemnification also shall apply to all liabilities and claims against the Trustee arising from any breach of fiduciary responsibility by fiduciaries other than Trustee, unless the Trustee participates knowingly in such breach, or has actual knowledge of such breach and fails to take reasonable remedial action to remedy such breach.  The Trustee shall be entitled to collect on the Company's indemnity under this Agreement only from the Company and shall not be entitled to payment directly or indirectly from the Plan.

	2.	The Trustee shall give the Company prompt written notice of any asserted or potential claim by any party with respect to which the Trustee reasonably expects to assert a claim for indemnification.  The Company shall have the right to defend and control the nature of any action or defense to any such claim or demand which may be asserted against the Trustee for which the Trustee reasonably expects to assert a claim for indemnification.

	**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the parties hereto have set their hands and executed this Agreement, effective June 12, 1999.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. New York, Ontario and Western Railway Company, Respondent, *v.*Augustus B. Shaw et al., as Assessors of the Town of Hamden, Appellants.

*People ex rel.*N. *Y., Ontario & W. Ry. Co.*v. *Shaw,*143 App. Div. 811, affirmed.

(Argued April 26, 1911;

decided May 16, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered *557March 31, 1911, which modified and affirmed as modified an order of Special Term reducing and confirming as reduced an assessment against the relator for purposes of taxation.

*A. G. Patterson*for appellants.

*Charles L. Andrus*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
-----Original Message----- 

From: random@nine-q.net [mailto:random@nine-q.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 8:29 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

Treating mental health on full parity with all other medical health is 

a change that we've long needed to undertake as a society. This helps 

make that change happen that much sooner, and for that I am 

enthusiastically grateful. 

Sincerely, 

Tal Loos 

649 Hinman Ave., Unit 3S 

Evanston, IL 60202