alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 179.500-16 Tests of pressure relief devices. ( a ) Pressure relief valves shall be tested by air or gas before being put into service. Valve shall open at pressure not exceeding the marked test pressure of tank and shall be vapor-tight at 80 percent of the marked test pressure. These limiting pressures shall not be affected by any auxiliary closure or other combination.
( b ) For pressure relief devices that incorporate a rupture disc, samples of the discs used shall burst at a pressure not exceeding the marked test pressure of tank and not less than 7 ⁄ 10 of marked test pressure.
[Amdt. 179-32, 48 FR 27708, June 16, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 45391, Aug. 28, 2001]
###### Editorial Note on Part 192

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

#### § 192.551 Scope.

This subpart prescribes minimum requirements for increasing maximum allowable operating pressures (uprating) for pipelines.
-----Original Message----- 

From: CecieJ@aol.com [mailto:CecieJ@aol.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 7:28 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Cecelia Jay 

1002 Torredge Rd 

Durham, NC 27712
| 1. | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,      2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending March 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Benda Pharmaceutical, Inc. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May      24, 2010          |   |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                        |   |   |   |   |
| /s/      Yiqing Wan                         |   |   |        |   |
| Yiqing      Wan                             |   |   |        |   |
| President,      CEO and Director            |   |   |   |   |
| Chief      Financial and Accounting Officer |   |   |   |   |

----
### IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING
201 3 W Y 78 April Term, A.D. 20 1 3

June 26, 2013 JERRY LEE HOCH, Appellant (Defendant),

v. THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff). S

- 13

- 0017



### O RDER 

### A

FFIRMING THE 

### D ISTRICT 

### C OUR T 

### ’ S 

### O RDER 

### D ENYING 

### M OTION TO 

### W ITHDRAW 

### P LEA [¶1] This matter came b e f o r e t h e C o u r t u p o n i t s o w

n m o t i o n f

o l l o w i n g n o t i f

i c a t i o n that A ppellant has not filed a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court. P u r s u a n t to a plea agreement, Appellant entered a “ no contest ” plea to one count of second degree murder

. Shortly after the “Judgment and Sentence” was entered, Appellant filed a post

sentenc e motion to withdraw his plea. On December 12 , 20 12, the district court entered its “ Order Denying Motion to With draw Plea

. ” Appellant took thi s appeal t o challenge t h at order . On March 25 , 201 3 , Appellant’s court

- appointed appellate counsel filed a “Motion to Withdraw as Counsel,” pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Following a careful review of the record and the “ Anders brief” submitted by counsel, this Court, on April 2 3 , 201 3 , entered its “Order Granting Permission for Court Appointed Counsel to Withdraw.” That Order notified Appellant that the D istrict Court’s “ Order Denying Motion to Withdraw Plea ” would be affirmed unless, on or before June 7 , 201 3 , Appellant filed a brief that persuaded this Court that the captioned appeal is not wholly frivolous . Taking note that A ppellant, Jerry Lee Hoch , has not filed a brief or other pleading within the time allotted , the Court finds that the district court’s “ Order Denying Motion to Withdraw Plea ” should be affirmed. It is, therefore,[ ¶ 2 ] O R D E R E D that the District Court’s December 12 , 20 1 2 , “ Order Denying Motion

to Withdraw Plea ” be , and the same hereby is, affirme d. [ ¶ 3 ] D A T E D t h i s 2 6 t h d a y o f J u n e , 2 0 1 3

.

B Y T H E C O U R T :

/ s /
M A R I L Y N S
. K I T E C h i e f J u s t i c e
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, William C. Niegsch, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Max & Erma’s Restaurants,Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably
26

 
   likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: June 20, 2007                                                  /s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr.   William C. Niegsch, Jr.,   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 29, 1995 (123), Para 123.46 Deletions of Sponsors from Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1494]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.123.46  deletions of sponsors from public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were deleted from public bills 
and resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 359: Mr. Nadler.
       H.R. 390: Mr. Barrett of Wisconsin.
       H.R. 534: Mr. Emerson.
       H.R. 789: Mr. Torricelli.
       H.R. 1289: Ms. Woolsey.

```
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3436

___________

C. Dennis Zyburo; Catherine A. Zyburo, *

*

Appellants, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Marriott Hotel Services, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: July 28, 1999

Filed: August 13, 1999

___________

Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

C. Dennis Zyburo and Catherine A. Zyburo appeal following an adverse jury

verdict in the Zyburos' action to recover for injuries suffered when C. Dennis Zyburo

slipped and fell in a Marriott Hotel. The Zyburos contend the district court committed

error in admitting certain evidence offered by the hotel and in permitting jury argument

about this evidence. The Zyburos also contend the district court committed error in

submitting a jury instruction that misstated their theory of liability against the hotel.

Having reviewed the record in the context of the Zyburos' arguments, we find the

record supports the district court's decisions. Because our review involves the

application of well-established principles of law in fact intensive circumstances, we
-2-

conclude an extensive discussion would serve no useful precedential purpose. We thus

affirm the district court without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 5:35 PM

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyd-yn4d

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2169

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: George Gianacakos

General Comment

As an Investment Advisor with 28 years of working with the public, I wanted to express my 

opinion. 

Americans that are planning for their future need more financial guidance as the record shows 

that many are not prepared for retirement.

I think any new regulations that limit available options for planning will increase the number of 

Americans that are not prepared financially.

The focus should not be solely on low costs but on the value that is delivered to my clients.
Editorial Note on Part 193
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

§ 193.2067 Wind forces. ( a ) LNG facilities must be designed to withstand without loss of structural or functional integrity: ( 1 ) The direct effect of wind forces;
( 2 ) The pressure differential between the interior and exterior of a confining, or partially confining, structure; and
( 3 ) In the case of impounding systems for LNG storage tanks, impact forces and potential penetrations by wind borne missiles.
( b ) The wind forces at the location of the specific facility must be based on one of the following: ( 1 ) For shop fabricated containers of LNG or other hazardous fluids with a capacity of not more than 70,000 gallons, applicable wind load data in ASCE/SEI 7 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 193.2013).
( 2 ) For all other LNG facilities: ( i ) An assumed sustained wind velocity of not less than 150 miles per hour, unless the Administrator finds a lower velocity is justified by adequate supportive data; or
( ii ) The most critical combination of wind velocity and duration, with respect to the effect on the structure, having a probability of exceedance in a 50-year period of 0.5 percent or less, if adequate wind data are available and the probabilistic methodology is reliable.
[45 FR 9203, Feb. 11, 1980, as amended by Amdt. 193-1, 45 FR 57419, Aug. 28, 1980; 58 FR 14522, Mar. 18, 1993; Amdt. 193-16, 63 FR 37505, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 193-17, 65 FR 10959, Mar. 1, 2000; Amdt. 193-19, 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006; Amdt. 193-22, 75 FR 48604, Aug. 11, 2010; Amdt. 193-25, 80 FR 183, Jan. 5, 2015]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2228

To waive the time limitations applicable to awarding the Medal of Honor

posthumously to Ruben Rivers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 4, 1995

Mr. MILLER of California (for himself, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. BISHOP, Mr.

BONIOR, Mr. BONO, Mr. BUNN of Oregon, Mr. BREWSTER, Mrs.

CHENOWETH, Mr. COLEMAN, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. COOLEY, Ms.

DELAURO, Mr. DELLUMS, Mr. DIXON, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. EHRLICH, Mr.

ENGEL, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. FILNER, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. FRAZER, Mr. FROST, Mr.

GUTKNECHT, Ms. JACKSON-LEE, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. JOHNSON of

South Dakota, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. LANTOS, Mr.

LEACH, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. LIPINSKI, Ms. LOFGREN, Ms.

MCCARTHY, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Ms. MCKINNEY, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr.

MEEHAN, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Ms. NORTON, Mr. OLVER, Mr. OWENS,

Mr. PASTOR, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. REYNOLDS, Ms. RIVERS,

Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. SCOTT, Mrs. SCHROEDER, Mr. SHAYS,

Mr. STEARNS, Mr. TORRES, Mr. TUCKER, Mr. THOMPSON, Mr.

UNDERWOOD, Mr. VENTO, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Ms. WATERS, Mr. WATT of

North Carolina, and Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on National Security

A BILL

To waive the time limitations applicable to awarding the

Medal of Honor posthumously to Ruben Rivers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the time limitations set forth in section 3744(b) of
2

•HR 2228 IH

1 title 10, United States Code, with respect to the awarding

2 of certain medals to persons in the Armed Forces shall

3 not apply with respect to the posthumous award of the

4 Medal of Honor to Ruben Rivers of Tecumseh, Oklahoma,

5 in recognition of acts performed by him at the risk of his

6 life and beyond the call of duty during November 1944

7 while serving as a staff sergeant in the United States

8 Army in Bougaltroff, France, during World War II.

Æ
#### § 234.201 Location of plans.

Plans required for proper maintenance and testing shall be kept at each highway-rail grade crossing warning system location. Plans shall be legible and correct.
-----Original Message----- 

From: lrifkin12@mac.com [mailto:lrifkin12@mac.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:48 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Laura Rifkin 

4008 Altamont Ave 

Oakland, CA 94605
§ 239.3 Application. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this part applies to all: ( 1 ) Railroads that operate intercity or commuter passenger train service on standard gage track which is part of the general railroad system of transportation;
( 2 ) Railroads that provide commuter or other short-haul rail passenger train service in a metropolitan or suburban area (as described by 49 U.S.C. 20102(1)), including public authorities operating passenger train service; and
( 3 ) Passenger or freight railroads hosting the operation of passenger train service described in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section.
( b ) This part does *not* apply to: ( 1 ) Rapid transit operations in an urban area that are not connected with the general railroad system of transportation;
( 2 ) Operation of private cars, including business/office cars and circus trains; or
( 3 ) Tourist, scenic, historic, or excursion operations, whether on or off the general railroad system.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               4
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      719
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                          5
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,021
<PP&E>                                             348
<DEPRECIATION>                                      70
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,187
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,555
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           535
<OTHER-SE>                                        (903)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,187
<SALES>                                             51
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   436
<CGS>                                               39
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       45
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   559
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (223)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (223)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (223)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.02)


</TABLE>
From: betty@networksplus.net [mailto:betty@networksplus.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:13 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Betty Phillips 

3120 SE Humboldt 

Topeka, KS 66605
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 20, 1995 (118), Para 118.20 Providing for the Consideration of the Conference Report on H.R. 1817]
[Page 1423]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.118.20  providing for the consideration of the conference report on 
          h.r. 1817

  Mr. McINNIS, by direction of the Committee on Rules, called up the 
following resolution (H. Res. 223):

       Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be 
     in order to consider the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R. 1817) making appropriations for the fiscal year 
     ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes. All points 
     of order against the conference report and against its 
     consideration are waived.

  When said resolution was considered.
  After debate,
  On motion of Mr. McINNIS, the previous question was ordered on the 
resolution to its adoption or rejection and under the operation thereof, 
the resolution was agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said resolution, was agreed to 
was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, October 13, 1995 (128), Para 128.1 Designation of Speaker Pro Tempore]
[Page 1528]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.128.1  designation of speaker pro tempore

  The House was called to order at 10:00 o'clock a.m., by the SPEAKER 
pro tempore, Mr. LaHOOD, who laid before the House the following 
communication:

                                               Washington, DC,

                                                 October 13, 1995.
       I hereby designate the Honorable Ray LaHood to act as 
     Speaker pro tempore on this day.
                                                    Newt Gingrich,
                         Speaker of the House of Representatives.
```
Order entered July 20 , 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 00612
- CV
ABDUL HAMID RASUL AN D ABRAHAM RASUL, Appellant s V. AZIZI RAHMAN RASUL, M. SHUAIB RASUL, M. IQBAL RASUL, KHALIL RAHMAN RASUL, HABIB RAHMAN RASUL, M. AMIN RASUL , AND RHAMAN TYRES

INTERNATIONAL (PRIVA TE) LIMITED, Appellee s On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429
- 00061
- 2013



### O RDER
Before the Court is appellants’ July 18, 2017 unopposed joint motion to extend time to file appellants’ brief. We GRANT appellants’ motion and ORDER appellants’ brief filed on or
before October 10, 2017 . We caution appellants that further requests for extension of time will
be disfavored.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
-----Original Message----- 

From: jake1email@yahoo.com [mailto:jake1email@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:14 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Craig Levine 

602 Schenck Dr. 

Flemington, NJ 08822
-----Original Message----- 

From: char.sokatch@state.mn.us [mailto:char.sokatch@state.mn.us] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 12:50 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Char Sokatch 

1242 Jessie St 

Saint Paul, MN 55130