alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 1 to the Treasury Department Circular 570, 2007 Revision, published July 2, 2007, at 72 FR 36192.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to the following company: FCCI Insurance Company (NAIC #10178). Business Address: 6300 University Parkway, Sarasota, FL 34240. Phone: (800) 226-3224 xt 7632. Underwriting Limitation b/: $39,014,000. Surety Licenses c/: AL, AZ, FL, GA, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, MI, MS, MO, NE, NC, OK, PA, SC, TN. Incorporated in: Florida.

Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (“Circular”), 2007 Revision, to reflect this addition.

                    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30th each year, unless revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (                    *see*                     CFR part 223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of July 1st in the Circular, which outlines details as to underwriting limitations, areas in which companies are licensed to transact surety business, and other information.                

                    The circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at                     *http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c570.*

Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Dated: August 14, 2007.

Vivian L. Cooper,

Director, Financial Accounting and Service Division, Financial Management Service.

[FR Doc. 07-4203 Filed 8-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0701 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Mary Beasley 

Address: 

6102 End of the Trail 

Austin, TX, 78734 

Email: jewelsonthelake@earthlink.net 

Phone: 512-266-2226 

General Comment 

I am very supportive of most of the provisions of the interim final rules under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008. These rules address many of 

the inequities in health insurance coverage of mental health care when compared to medical/surgical 

care that I have observed in the course of my mental health practice. 

However, in my opinion, two areas have not been sufficiently clarified. I am quite concerned that 

unless these points are more clearly specified in the final regulations, loopholes will remain that will 

permit widespread violation of the legislative intent of the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental 

Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008: 

1. In my opinion, the interim final rules do not define clearly enough the rules regulating the 

comprehensive scope of services parity between mental health/substance abuse services and 

medical/surgical services. Given the language of the Act and the positions already taken by the 

Departments in the interim final regulations, I request that the Final Rules clarify that benefits for 

MH/SUD must be comparable in scope to the benefits provided in medical/surgical care both across 

and within each classification. Unless parity in scope of services is required in the final regulations, 

the intent of the Act will not be achieved. 

2. I strongly support the application of parity requirements to both QTLs and NQTLs as being 

consistent with the Act and allowing for broad application of the parity requirement with regard to 

treatment limitations. However, in order to implement the intent of the Act, the regulations must 

specify more clearly that any NQTLs that are applied by plans must be comparable for MH/SUD and 

medical surgical benefits, and that any NQTLs for MH/SUD must be no more restrictive than NQTLs 

that are predominant across the broad range of medical/surgical benefits.Thank you, Mary Beasley 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 03, 2010 

Received: May 03, 2010 

Status: DoNotPost 

Tracking No. 80ae583a 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 2

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 5/3/2010
Page 2 of 2

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 5/3/2010
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
AND OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF



NEW YORK STATE ELECTRIC & GAS CORPORATION



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



We, James P. Laurito, President, and Joseph J. Syta, Controller and Treasurer, of New York State Electric & Gas Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) New York State Electric & Gas Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of New York State Electric & Gas Corporation.

Dated:  March 8, 2004

/s/James P. Laurito                  James P. Laurito
         President



/s/Joseph J. Syta                     Joseph J. Syta
        Controller and Treasurer
EA Report

11/29/10



## IUR Chemical Information Statistics

CAS # reported for chem. ID 28395

Unique CAS # reported for chem. ID 7271

Documents containing a CAS # reported for chem. ID 4215

Accession # reported for chem. ID 382

Unique Accession # reported for chem. ID 261

Documents containing an Accession # reported for chem. ID 185

PMN # reported for chem. ID 184

Unique PMN # reported for chem. ID 178

Documents containing a PMN # reported for chem. ID 86

CAS # reported for chem. ID claimed CBI 343

Unique CAS # reported for chem. ID claimed CBI 297
#### Maria Miller, *Respondent, v.*Henry L. Miller and others, *Appellants.*

— Order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned; P. J.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2016-2069 Directorate ID: 2015-SW-070-AD

Helicopter Model: Agusta S.p.A. Model A109A and A109AII helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 33 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to detect a crack in a main rotor blade and prevent 

failure of a blade and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $30,000 per replacement

Labor per Helicopter

(1 work-hour X $85 for 

inspection)

(4 work-hours X $85 for 

replacement)

$85

$340

Other

(Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $85 per inspection

$30,340 per replacement

Total U.S. Fleet Cost $2,805 per inspection

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Matt Fuller
§ 178.255-9 Compartments. ( a ) When the interior of the tank is divided into compartments, each compartment shall be designed, constructed and tested as a separate tank. Thickness of shell and compartment heads shall be determined on the basis of total tank capacity.
( b ) [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 193
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

§ 193.2155 Structural requirements. ( a ) The structural members of an impoundment system must be designed and constructed to prevent impairment of the system's performance reliability and structural integrity as a result of the following: ( 1 ) The imposed loading from— ( i ) Full hydrostatic head of impounded LNG;
( ii ) Hydrodynamic action, including the effect of any material injected into the system for spill control;
( iii ) The impingement of the trajectory of an LNG jet discharged at any predictable angle; and
( iv ) Anticipated hydraulic forces from a credible opening in the component or item served, assuming that the discharge pressure equals design pressure.
( 2 ) The erosive action from a spill, including jetting of spilling LNG, and any other anticipated erosive action including surface water runoff, ice formation, dislodgement of ice formation, and snow removal.
( 3 ) The effect of the temperature, any thermal gradient, and any other anticipated degradation resulting from sudden or localized contact with LNG.
( 4 ) Exposure to fire from impounded LNG or from sources other than impounded LNG.
( 5 ) If applicable, the potential impact and loading on the dike due to— ( i ) Collapse of the component or item served or adjacent components; and
( ii ) If the LNG facility adjoins the right-of-way of any highway or railroad, collision by or explosion of a train, tank car, or tank truck that could reasonably be expected to cause the most severe loading.
( b ) An LNG storage tank must not be located within a horizontal distance of one mile (1.6 km) from the ends, or 1 ⁄ 4 mile (0.4 km) from the nearest point of a runway, whichever is longer. The height of LNG structures in the vicinity of an airport must also comply with Federal Aviation Administration requirements in 14 CFR Section 1.1.
[45 FR 9203, Feb. 11, 1980, as amended by Amdt. 193-17, 65 FR 10959, Mar. 1, 2000]
### Data & Analysis

MPA Inventory Ocean Uses Atlas De Facto MPAs Analysis of U.S. MPAs Maps 

# The Marine Protected Areas Inventory

> Data & Analysis> MPA Inventory

The Marine Protected Areas Inventory (MPA Inventory) is a comprehensive and classify marine protected areas within US waters. The Inventory contains information on over 1,600 the only such comprehensive dataset in the nation. The database has various applications for marine management and conservation, but its primary purpose is to maintain baseline information on MPAs to the development of the National System of MPAs, as defined in Executive Order 13158. used for regulatory purposes; please consult the Federal Register for the official developed with extensive input from state and federal MPA programs and drawn from other publically available The data and products derived from the Inventory are served in various formats accessed by the links below. The MPA Center is continually updating and verifying the Inventory data, so please information, existing site clarifications or updated spatial boundary data. The data and products derived from the Inventory are served in various

Interactive Mapping Tool This NEW application provides online access to the MPA Inventory data through an environment. This tool can be used to view the MPA Inventory sites and associated data, query sites by specific conservation attributes or to search and view sites by region. MPA Mapping Tool. (First time users, please expect a one

Tabular Data The tabular data are current through January 2010 and include classification information on all sites in the MPA Inventory. These data are served in excel spreadsheet format (.xls) with FGDC compliant metadata describing the data fields and classification attributes. the tabular data. GIS Spatial Data The GIS data for the MPA Inventory are current through January 2010 and include information ~1,450 sites in the MPA Inventory for which GIS data are available. [zip, 90MB] and ESRI geodatabase [zip, 41.6MB] formats with FGDC compliant metadata describing the data fields and classification attributes. Maps Follow this link to explore various maps and analytical products that have been derived from the MPA Inventory data. Documents 

### Page 1 of2 National Marine Protected Areas Center: The Marine Protected Areas Inventory

3/7/2011 http://www.mpa.gov/dataanalysis/mpainventory/If you would like to propose the addition of an MPA to the MPA Inventory, please complete the form below and return to the MPA Inventory team

.

 MPA Inventory ‒ New Site Form For more information, contact: Mimi D'Iorio GIS Manager Mimi.Diorio@noaa.gov See links below for background documents and related resources for the MPA Inventory:

 Coastal and Ocean Management and Use Databases for Diverse  Snapshot of United States MPAs

About This Site | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Site Map | Contact Revised October 21, 2010 | Site jointly managed by the U.S. Department of Commerce / NOAA and the Web Site Owner: National Ocean Service 

### Page 2 of2 National Marine Protected Areas Center: The Marine Protected Areas Inventory

3/7/2011 http://www.mpa.gov/dataanalysis/mpainventory/
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.453 Fissile materials—exceptions. Fissile materials meeting the requirements of at least one of the paragraphs (a) through (f) of this section are excepted from the requirements of this subpart for fissile materials, including the requirements of §§ 173.457 and 173.459, but are subject to all other requirements of this subpart, except as noted. ( a ) An individual package containing 2 grams or less of fissile material.
( b ) An individual or bulk packaging containing 15 grams or less of fissile material provided the package has at least 200 grams of solid nonfissile material for every gram of fissile material. Lead, beryllium, graphite, and hydrogenous material enriched in deuterium may be present in the package but must not be included in determining the required mass for solid nonfissile material.
( c ) Low concentrations of solid fissile material commingled with solid nonfissile material, provide that: ( 1 ) There is at least 2000 grams of nonfissile material for every gram of fissile material, and
( 2 ) There is no more than 180 grams of fissile material distributed within 360 kg of contiguous nonfissile material. Lead, beryllium, graphite, and hydrogenous material enriched in deuterium may be present in the package but must not be included in determining the required mass of solid nonfissile material.
( d ) Uranium enriched in uranium-235 to a maximum of 1 percent by weight, and with total plutonium and uranium-233 content of up to 1 percent of the mass of uranium-235, provided that the mass of any beryllium, graphite, and hydrogenous material enriched in deuterium constitute less than 5 percent of the uranium mass.
( e ) Liquid solutions of uranyl nitrate enriched in uranium-235 to a maximum of 2 percent by mass, with a total plutonium and uranium-233 content not exceeding 0.002 percent of the mass of uranium, and with a minimum nitrogen to uranium atomic ratio (N/U) of 2. The material must be contained in at least a DOT Type A package.
( f ) Packages containing, individually, a total plutonium mass of not more than 1000 grams, of which not more than 20 percent by mass may consist of plutonium-239, plutonium-241, or any combination of these radionuclides.
[69 FR 3692, Jan. 26, 2004]
-----Original Message----- 

From: calison50@gmail.com [mailto:calison50@gmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 10:08 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

alison cunningham 

19 wilkins st 

hamden, CT 06517
```

[112th Congress Public Law 225]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 1605]]

Public Law 112-225
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 320 7th Street in Ellwood City, Pennsylvania, as the ``Sergeant Leslie 
  H. Sabo, Jr. Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Dec. 28, 2012 -  [H.R. 
                                5954]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SERGEANT LESLIE H. SABO, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 320 7th Street in Ellwood City, Pennsylvania, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sergeant Leslie H. Sabo, Jr. Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Leslie H. Sabo, Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Approved December 28, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5954:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            Nov. 28, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 19, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 213.63 Track surface.

(a) Except as provided in [paragraph (b)](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-213.63#p-213.63(b)) of this section, each track owner shall maintain the surface of its track within the limits prescribed in the following table:

| Track surface (inches) | Class of track | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| The runoff in any 31 feet of rail at the end of a raise may not be more than | 31/2 | 3 | 2 | 11/2 | 1 |
| The deviation from uniform profile on either rail at the mid-ordinate of a 62-foot chord may not be more than | 3 | 23/4 | 21/4 | 2 | 11/4 |
| The deviation from zero crosslevel at any point on tangent or reverse crosslevel elevation on curves may not be more than | 3 | 2 | 13/4 | 11/4 | 1 |
| The difference in crosslevel between any two points less than 62 feet apart may not be more than \* 1 2 | 3 | 21/4 | 2 | 13/4 | 11/2 |
| \*Where determined by engineering decision prior to June 22, 1998, due to physical restrictions on spiral length and operating practices and experience, the variation in crosslevel on spirals per 31 feet may not be more than | 2 | 13/4 | 11/4 | 1 | 3/4 |
| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Except as limited by [§ 213.57(a)](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-213.57#p-213.57(a)), where the elevation at any point in a curve equals or exceeds 6 inches, the difference in crosslevel within 62 feet between that point and a point with greater elevation may not be more than 11/2 inches. | | | | | |
| 2 However, to control harmonics on Class 2 through 5 jointed track with staggered joints, the crosslevel differences shall not exceed 11/4 inches in all of six consecutive pairs of joints, as created by seven low joints. Track with joints staggered less than 10 feet apart shall not be considered as having staggered joints. Joints within the seven low joints outside of the regular joint spacing shall not be considered as joints for purposes of this footnote. | | | | | |

(b) For operations at a qualified cant deficiency, Eu, of more than 5 inches, each track owner shall maintain the surface of the curve within the limits prescribed in the following table:

| Track surface (inches) | Class of track | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| The deviation from uniform profile on either rail at the mid-ordinate of a 31-foot chord may not be more than | N/A1 | N/A1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| The deviation from uniform profile on either rail at the mid-ordinate of a 62-foot chord may not be more than | 21/4 | 21/4 | 13/4 | 11/4 | 1 |
| The difference in crosslevel between any two points less than 10 feet apart (short warp) shall not be more than | 2 | 2 | 13/4 | 13/4 | 11/2 |
| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 N/A—Not Applicable. | | | | | |

[[78 FR 16101](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/78-FR-16101), Mar. 13, 2013]
§ 230.9 Information collection. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) The information collection requirements are found in the following sections: §§ 230.3, 230.12 through 230.21, 230.33, 230.34, 230.41, 230.46, 230.47, 230.75, 230.96, 230.98, and 230.116.
§ 238.743 Emergency lighting. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, Tier III trainsets shall comply with the emergency lighting requirements specified in § 238.115.
( b ) Emergency lighting back-up power systems shall, at a minimum, be capable of operating after experiencing the individually applied accelerations defined in either of the following paragraphs: ( 1 ) Section 238.115(a)(4)(ii); or
( 2 ) Section 6.1.4, “Security of furniture, equipment and features,” of GM/RT2100, provided that— ( i ) The conditions of § 238.705(b)(2) are met;
( ii ) The initial shock of a collision or derailment is based on a minimum load of 5g longitudinal, 3g lateral, and 3g vertical; and
( iii ) Use of the standard is carried out under any conditions identified by the railroad, as approved by FRA.
( c ) Railway Group Standard GM/RT2100, Issue Four, “Requirements for Rail Vehicle Structures,” December 2010, is incorporated by reference into this section with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at Federal Railroad Administration, Docket Clerk, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC and is available from Rail Safety and Standards Board Ltd., Communications, RSSB, Block 2 Angel Square, 1 Torrens Street, London, England EC1V 1NY, *www.rgsonline.co.uk*. It is also available for inspection at NARA. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html*.