alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47119-47120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4105]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice Before Waiver With Respect to Land at Lonesome Pine 
Airport, Wise, VA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent of waiver with respect to land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is publishing notice of proposed release of 0.81 acres 
of land at the Lonesome Pine Airport, Wise, Virginia to the town of 
Wise or Wise county Industrial Development Authority (Property Map 
Parcel 35). The release of land will transfer the responsibility (and 
potential liability) for maintenance and security of the water tank 
site to the appropriate governmental entity. Releasing the land

[[Page 47120]]

does not adversely impact theAirport and the land is not needed for 
airport development as shown on the Airport Layout Plan. Fair Market 
Value of the land has been assessed and will be provided to The 
Cumberlands Airport Commission for Airport and commission operational 
expenses.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 21, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered in 
triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Terry J. Page, Manager, 
FAA Washington Airports District Office, 23723 Air Freight Lane, Suite 
210, Dulles, VA 20166.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Walter H. Witt, Cumberlands Airport Commission, 
at the following address: Walter H. Witt, Chairman, Cumberlands Airport 
Commission, PO Box 1752, Wise, Virginia 24293.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Terry Page, Manager, Washington 
Airports District Office, 23723 Air Freight Lane, Suite 210, Dulles, VA 
20166; telephone (703) 661-1354, fax (703) 661-1370, e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#683c0d1a1a114638090f0d280e0909460f071e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9aceffe8e8e3b4cafbfdffdafcfbfbb4fdf5ec">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 5, 2000, new authorizing 
legislation became effective. That bill, the Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century, Public Law 10-181 (Apr. 
5, 2000; 114 Stat. 61) (AIR 21) requires that a 30-day public notice 
must be provided before the Secretary may waive any condition imposed 
on an interest in surplus property.

    Issued in Chantilly, Virginia on June 20, 2007.
Terry J. Page,
Manager, Washington Airports District Office Eastern Region.
[FR Doc. 07-4105 Filed 8-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
-----Original Message----- 

From: steve_tarpley@comcast.net [mailto:steve_tarpley@comcast.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 7:05 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

STEVE TARPLEY 

3048 ELLICE WAY 

NAPLES,, FL 34119
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9219-9220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3647]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 
Reservation

AGENCY: Department of Energy, DoE.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Oak Ridge 
Reservation. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 
Stat.

[[Page 9220]]

770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in the 
Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Office of Scientific and Technical Information, 1 
Science.gov Way, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melyssa P. Noe, Federal Coordinator, 
Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM-90, 
Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865) 241-3315; Fax (865) 576-0956 or email: 
noemp@oro.doe.gov or check the Web site at www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of 
environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: The meeting presentation will be an update on 
decontamination and decommissioning work at the East Tennessee 
Technology Park. The presenter will be Jim Kopotic, DOE Oak Ridge.
    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Oak Ridge, welcomes the 
attendance of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will 
make every effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or 
special needs. If you require special accommodations due to a 
disability, please contact Melyssa P. Noe at least seven days in 
advance of the meeting at the phone number listed above. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to the 
agenda item should contact Melyssa P. Noe at the address or telephone 
number listed above. Requests must be received five days prior to the 
meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include the 
presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer is 
empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. Individuals wishing to make public 
comments will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present their 
comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Melyssa P. 
Noe at the address and phone number listed above. Minutes will also be 
available at the following Web site: http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab/minutes.htm.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on February 13, 2012.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-3647 Filed 2-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0268 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Daniel Patrick McKenna 

Address: 

2531 Fairfax St 

Denver, CO, 80207 

Email: danmcken@gmail.com 

Phone: 303-748-7199 

General Comment 

I encourage adoption of the mental health parity and inclusion of behavioral mental 

health treatment including biofeedback modalities. As a therapist working in 

Colorado for the past 16 years, I have seen on many occasions the efficacy of 

biofeedback and behavioral approaches for a wide variety of conditions. I believe 

that the committees should consider adoption or review of the Colorado 

Department of Labor's Medical Treatment Guidelines which includes use of 

psychological and behavioral treatment for a variety of conditions. For information 

please follow this link http://www.coworkforce.com/dwc/medical_treatment.asp 

Sincerely, 

Daniel McKenna, MA, BCIAC 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 29, 2009 

Received: May 28, 2009 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 809bcfa9 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web
<PAGE>
         DESCRIPTION OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS         EXHIBIT 10.15

Compensation of Directors who are Employees of the Company

Employees of TJX are not paid for their service as a director.

Compensation of Non-Employee Directors

On December 6, 2005, the Board of Directors of TJX adopted the following
compensation arrangements for non-employee directors beginning in the fiscal
year ending in 2007:

-     Annual retainer of $40,000 for each director.

-     Annual retainer of $10,000 for each Committee chair.

-     Fee of $1,500 for each Board meeting attended.

-     Fee of $2,000 for each Committee meeting attended as a Committee member or
      $2,500 for each Committee meeting attended as Committee Chairperson.

-     Additional annual retainer of $70,000 for the Lead Director.

-     No annual stock option grant.

-     Two annual deferred share awards, each representing shares of TJX common
      stock valued at $50,000. One award vests immediately and is payable with
      accumulated dividends in stock at the earlier of separation from service
      as a director or change of control. The second award vests based on
      service as a director until the annual meeting next following the award
      and is payable with accumulated dividends in stock at the same time as the
      first award, or, if an irrevocable advance election is made, upon vesting.

-     Reimbursement for customary expenses for attending Board and committee
      meetings.


The Executive Committee is excluded from the above committee-specific
compensation. Directors may participate in TJX's General Deferred Compensation
Plan. TJX does not provide retirement benefits or insurance for non-employee
directors. The Stock Incentive Plan was amended to eliminate the annual director
option grant and to provide for the deferred share grants described above.

The Lead Director will receive a one-time payment of $35,000, payable February
1, 2006 in recognition of his services in connection with the CEO transition.

The Corporate Governance Principles were amended to provide that each
non-employee director's equity ownership should grow over five years to, and be
maintained at, a minimum of $200,000 (including shares owned directly and vested
deferred shares but excluding unexercised options).
Served: October 20, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

------------------------------------------------------------

SHUTTLE AMERICA CORPORATION

-----------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On October 6, 2010, Shuttle America Corporation (“Shuttle”), a U.S. certificated air carrier,1

requested that the Department register the trade name “Continental Express” for use in certain air 

transportation operations. 

Part 215 (14 CFR Part 215) of the Department’s regulations provides that any air carrier wishing 

to use an alternative trade name must first register that name with the Department. The rule 

further states that the Department may register such name after the air carrier gives notification 

to similarly named air carriers of the proposed use of the name. In this case, Shuttle currently 

operates under the trade name “United Express,” and in light of the recent merger of United Air 

Lines Inc. (“United”) and Continental Airlines, Inc. (“Continental”), Shuttle requires flexibility 

to operate as a Continental Express air carrier as well. Shuttle further states it has notified 

Continental of the proposed use of the Continental Express trade name.

We note that Shuttle also states that Continental will make all required disclosures of the identity 

of the operating air carrier and trade name in accordance with the provisions of Part 257 of the 

Department’s regulations (14 CFR Part 257). In addition, Shuttle states that the aircraft to be 

used to operate service on behalf of Continental will clearly indicate that Shuttle is the operating 

carrier. 

Since Shuttle has complied with the requirements of Part 215, we acknowledge the registration 

of the trade name “Continental Express” for immediate use in its operations.

Dated at Washington, D.C., October 20, 2010.

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov

 

1 Shuttle’s interstate certificate was last reissued by Order 2009-3-16, on March 23, 2009. 
Attachment A 

SERVICE LIST FOR SHUTTLE AMERICA CORPORATION

 MR PATRICK R RIZZI

 COUNSEL FOR SHUTTLE AMERICA 

 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

 555 THIRTEENTH STREET

 WASHINGTON DC 20004

 

MR BERNARD STANKUS RTS-42

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E-36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

MR BRUCE RABINOVITZ

WILMER HALE

1875 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW 

WASHINGTON DC 20006

MR WILLIAM J WEBER

CERTIFICATION MANAGER

FAA AFS-900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

 MR R BRUCE KEINER

 CROWELL AND MORING LLP

 1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW

 WASHINGTON DC 20004

 

MR PETER LYNCH 

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR ENFORCEMENT 

FAA/AGC-300

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591

 

 MR CLAY MORITZ

 OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

 DOT/RSPA/BTS E-36

 1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

 WASHINGTON DC 20590
From: mbieksza@earthlink.net [mailto:mbieksza@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 7:39 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Mary-Ann Bieksza 

1514 Pine St., 

Bernardsville, NJ 07924
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 160 (Monday, August 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 46449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4056]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Coastal Engineering Research Board (CERB)

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
committee meeting:
    Name of Committee: Coastal Engineering Research Board (CERB).
    Date of Meeting: September 6-7, 2007.
    Place: Hilton Alexandria Old Town, 1767 King Street, Alexandria, VA 
22314.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. (September 6, 2007). 8 a.m. to 11 a.m. 
(September 7, 2007).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquiries and notice of intent to 
attend the meeting may be addressed to Colonel Richard B. Jenkins, 
Executive Secretary, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Research and 
Development Center, Waterways Experiment Station, 3909 Halls Ferry 
Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board provides broad policy guidance and 
review of plans and fund requirements for the conduct of research and 
development of research projects in consonance with the needs of the 
coastal engineering field and the objectives of the Chief of Engineers.
    Proposed Agenda: The morning session on Thursday, September 6, will 
be devoted to a report of the Board's findings and recommendations from 
its recent mission to The Netherlands regarding Systems Approaches to 
Flood Risk Management. The morning session will also include 
presentations from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to review research 
underway or planned for immediate initiation regarding flood risk 
management. The afternoon session will include presentations from other 
Federal and State agencies engaged in flood risk management in the 
United States. Friday morning, September 7, is devoted to Board 
Executive Session discussing ongoing initiatives and actions.
    These meetings are open to the public; participation by the public 
is scheduled for 4 p.m. on Thursday, September 6.
    The entire meeting is open to the public, but since seating 
capacity of the meeting is limited, advance notice of attendance is 
required. Oral participation by public attendees is encouraged during 
the time scheduled on the agenda; written statements may be submitted 
prior to the meeting or up to 30 days after the meeting.

Richard B. Jenkins,
Colonel, Corps of Engineers Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-4056 Filed 8-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-61-M
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 1232** 

XUE QIANG LIN , Petitioner ,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General , Respondent

.

**No. 12**  **- 2080** 

XUE QIANG LIN , Petitioner ,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General , Respondent.

On Petitions for Review of Order s of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : March 1, 2013 Decided: April 4, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.2 Petitions denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Adedayo O. Idowu, LAW OFFICES OF ADEDAYO O. IDOWU, PLLC, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Erica B. Miles, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jesse D. Lorenz, UNITED STATES DE PARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated petitions for review, Xue Qiang Lin, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitio ns for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) orders (1) dismissing his appeal of the immigration judge’s order denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (Appeal No. 12

- 12 32), and (2) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings (Appeal No. 12

- 2080). We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including Lin’s affidavit, the various supporting affidavits and documents presented to the immigration court, and the transcript o f Lin’s merits hearing. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the Board’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(b)(4)(B) (2006) , and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision to uphold the immigrati on judge’s denial of Lin’s application for relief

. See INS v. Elias

– Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992)

. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review in Appeal No. 12

- 1232 for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Xue Qiang Lin (B.I.A. Jan. 27, 201 2). We turn then to the Board’s order denying Lin’s motion to reopen his removal proceedings. W e have reviewed the record as relevant to that motion and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying reopen ing in this case

. See 84 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2012). We therefore deny the petition for review in Appeal No. 12

- 2080 for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Xue Qiang Lin (B.I.A. Aug. 7 , 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions a re adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION S DENIED
#### GEORGE S. ALLISON, Respondent, v. ROSA SCHMITZ and Others, Appellants.

*Usury*— *when a valid mortgage is not affected by a subsequent usurious agreement, although it be held by the party guilty of the usury.*

The plaintiff made a usurious agreement with the defendant Schmitz, whereby he agreed to loan to the latter $3,000; $2,500 of which was to be used in paying off an existing mortgage, the balance to be paid in cash. The plaintiff paid the amount of the first mortgage to the holder and took an assignment thereof. He also took the new mortgage for $3,000, which was subsequently decided to be usurious and void.

In this action, brought to foreclose the $2,500 mortgage assigned to the plaintiff: *Held,*that he acquired a perfect title thereto by the assignment and was entitled to foreclose it. ,

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the trial of this action by the court without a jury.

The action was brought to foreclose a mortgage.

*G.*P..Hoffman, for the appellants.

*Irving*Brown, for the respondent.

Barnard, P. J.:

The plaintiff agreed to loan to the defendant Schmitz, $3,000. The loan was made to pay» a mortgage existing upon the property of $2,500, and the remainder in cash. The agreement was usurious. The plaintiff paid the prior mortgage and took an assignment of it to himself. He also took a mortgage for $3,000, which sum included the old mortgage and the cash advanced. The $3,000 mortgage was decided void for usury. This action is brought to fore*107close this $2,500 mortgage. The mortgage in. question was not, in fact, paid by the defendant. -It was a' valid claim against her and the plaintiff paid the amount of the same to the holder and took an assignment. The amount was paid from the amount of the loan agreed to be made by defendant. The creditor was changed but the debt remained.

Schmitz had paid nothing. If this payment had been included in usurious mortgage the debt paid could still have been received and collected. *(Patterson*v. Birdsall, 64 N. Y., 294.)

If the plaintiff had himself owned the first mortgage and had taken the $3,000 mortgage under similar circumstances he could have enforced the old mortgage which, was free from usury. *(Gerwig*v. Sitterly, 56 N. Y., 214.)

The invalid mortgage cannot be used as a defense to a valid claim, ( *Winsted Bank*v. *Webb,*39 N. Y., 325.)

The plaintiff acquired a perfect title to the first mortgage by the assignment although the $3,000 mortgage was usurious, and although, he had agreed to pay the first mortgage out of the second loan.

■ The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Dykman and Pratt, JJ., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.