alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 01/71-0360]

      ( print page 50707)    
Notice is hereby given that Zero Stage Capital V, L.P., 265 Franklin Street, 18th Floor, Boston, MA 02110, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the Licensee's General Partner's continued role in managing the Licensee's assets after the sale of such assets to a buyer group, has sought an exemption under section 312 of the Act and section 107.730(a), self-deal which constitutes Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) rules. Zero Stage Capital Associates V, LP, the General partner of the Licensee, proposes to continue managing the Licensee's assets, which will be acquired by an institutional buyer (“Buyer”).

The management arrangement is brought within the purview of Sec. 107.730(a) of the Regulations because the Licensee's managers will benefit from their continued management role after the sale of the portfolio to the Buyer. Therefore, this management arrangement constitutes a conflict of interest which requires SBA's prior approval.

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction, within 15 days of the date of this publication, to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

Harry Haskins,

Acting Associate Administrator For Investment.

[FR Doc. 07-4306 Filed 8-31-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
§ 229.319 Operating Personnel Training. ( a ) The training required under § 229.317 for any locomotive engineer or other person who participates in the operation of a train using an onboard electronic locomotive control system shall address all of the following elements and shall be specified in the training program. ( 1 ) Familiarization with the electronic control system equipment onboard the locomotive and the functioning of that equipment as part of the system and in relation to other onboard systems under that person's control;
( 2 ) Any actions required of the operating personnel to enable or enter data into the system and the role of that function in the safe operation of the train;
( 3 ) Sequencing of interventions by the system, including notification, enforcement, penalty initiation and post penalty application procedures as applicable;
( 4 ) Railroad operating rules applicable to control systems, including provisions for movement and protection of any unequipped trains, or trains with failed or cut-out controls;
( 5 ) Means to detect deviations from proper functioning of onboard electronic control system equipment and instructions explaining the proper response to be taken regarding control of the train and notification of designated railroad personnel; and
( 6 ) Information needed to prevent unintentional interference with the proper functioning of onboard electronic control equipment.
( b ) The training required under this subpart for a locomotive engineer and conductor, together with required records, shall be integrated into the program of training required by parts 240 and 242 of this chapter.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, October 19, 1995 (131), Para 131.19 Senate Enrolled Bills Signed]
[Page 1569]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.131.19  senate enrolled bills signed

       The SPEAKER announced his signature to enrolled bills of 
     the Senate of the following titles:

       S. 268. An Act to authorize the collection of fees for 
     expenses for triploid grass carp certification inspections, 
     and for other purposes.
       S. 1111. An Act to amend title 35, United States Code, with 
     respect to patents on biotechnological processes.
       S. 227. An Act to amend title 17, United States Code, to 
     provide an exclusive right to perform sound recordings 
     publicly by means of digital transmissions, and for other 
     purposes.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, August 4, 1995 (109), Para 109.7 Recorded Vote]
[Pages 1265-1266]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.109.7  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. MARKEY:

[[Page 1266]]

       Page 126, after line 16, insert the following new 
     subsection (and redesignate the succeeding subsections and 
     accordingly):
       (f) Standard for Unreasonable Rates for Cable Programming 
     Services.--Section 623(c)(2) of the Act (47 U.S.C. 543(c)) is 
     amended to read as follows:
       ``(2) Standard for unreasonable rates.--The Commission may 
     only consider a rate for cable programming services to be 
     unreasonable if such rate has increased since June 1, 1995, 
     determined on a per-channel basis, by a percentage that 
     exceeds the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index 
     for All Urban Consumers (as determined by the Department of 
     Labor) since such date.''.
       Page 127, line 4, strike ``or 5 percent'' and all that 
     follows through ``greater,'' on line 6.
       Page 129, strike lines 16 through 21 and insert the 
     following:
       ``(d) Uniform Rate Structure.--A cable operator shall have 
     a uniform rate structure throughout its franchise area for 
     the provision of cable services.''.
       Page 130, line 16, insert ``and'' after the semicolon, and 
     strike line 20 and all that follows through line 2 on page 
     131 and insert the following:

     ``directly to subscribers in the franchise area and such 
     franchise area is also served by an unaffiliated cable 
     system.''.
       Page 131, strike line 6 and all that follows through line 
     21, and insert the following:
       ``(m) Small Cable Systems.--
       ``(1) Small cable system relief.--A small cable system 
     shall not be subject to subsections (a), (b), (c), or (d) in 
     any franchise area with respect to the provision of cable 
     programming services, or a basic service tier where such tier 
     was the only tier offered in such area on December 31, 1994.
       ``(2) Definition of small cable system.--For purposes of 
     this subsection, `small cable system' means a cable system 
     that--
       ``(A) directly or through an affiliate, serves in the 
     aggregate fewer than 250,000 cable subscribers in the United 
     States; and
       ``(B) directly serves fewer than 10,000 cable subscribers 
     in its franchise area.''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

148

negative

Nays

275
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: sipiora@excite.com [mailto:sipiora@excite.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 12:16 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

The mentally ill need treatment. 

Sincerely, 

Alexandra Sipiora 

40 E. Chicago Ave. #202 

Chicago, IL 60611
§ 92.15-10 Ventilation for closed spaces. ( a ) Except as noted in paragraph (c) of this section, all enclosed spaces within the vessel shall be properly vented or ventilated. Means shall be provided to close off all vents and ventilators.
( b ) Means shall be provided for stopping all fans in ventilation systems serving machinery and cargo spaces and for closing all doorways, ventilators and annular spaces around funnels and other openings to such spaces, from outside these spaces, in case of fire.
( c ) On unmanned cargo barges not fitted with a fixed bilge system, vents and ventilators may be omitted from void spaces.
( d ) The ventilation of spaces that are “specially suitable for vehicles” shall be in accordance with §§ 97.80-1, 111.105-39 and 111.105-40 of this chapter, as applicable. ( 1 ) Areas below the weather deck shall be provided with continuous pressure-positive ventilation at each level on which vehicles are transported.
( 2 ) The quantity of ventilating air shall be not less than 1 cubic foot per minute per square foot of deck area.
( 3 ) The ventilation system shall be such as to prevent air stratification as well as to prevent the accumulation of air pockets.
( 4 ) An alarm system shall be provided which will indicate the loss of required ventilation. The alarm location shall be in a normally manned space acceptable to the Commandant.
( e ) For requirements regarding controls of electrically powered ventilation systems, see subchapter J (Electrical Engineering) of this chapter.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16983, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 66-33, 31 FR 15284, Dec. 5, 1966; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65193, Oct. 31, 2008]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 9, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
C. Niegsch, Jr., the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr.
-----------------------------
William C. Niegsch, Jr.
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer

June 16, 2004

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

                                                                              24
Exhibit 10.7(d)


                                FRANK BRANDENBERG
                            1589 HICKORY VALLEY ROAD
                             MILFORD, MICHIGAN 48380

                                 MARCH 10, 2006


Board of Directors
American Mold Guard, Inc.
30200 Rancho Viejo Road
Suite G
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
Attention: Mr. Tom Blakely

Dear Sirs:

         This letter confirms my acceptance of your offer to join the Board of
Directors of American Mold Guard, Inc. immediately upon effectiveness of the
company's initial public offering.



                                                 Very truly yours,

                                                 /s/ Frank Brandenberg
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*James E. Mulford, Appellant.

*People*v. *Mulford,*140 App. Div. 716, affirmed.

(Argued June 6, 1911;

decided June 16, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the' Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 16, 1910, which affirmed a judgment of the Allegany County Court rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of unlawfully practicing medicine.

*Lee Fassett, B. B. Ackerman*and *Eldyn Reynolds*for appellant.

*James T. Ward*for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed, on the atithority of *People*v. *Allcutt*(117 App. Div. 546; affd., 189 N. Y. 517); no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
#### Daniel McMahon, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

The undersigned certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

 

(1) Theaccompanying Quarterly Reporton Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the accompanying Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Date:  June 13,  2008 |                                                             |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                                             |
|                                 |                                                             |
|                                 | /s/ Joseph C.  Christenson                                       |
|                                 | Joseph C. Christenson                                            |
|                                 | President,  Chief Executive Officer and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
From: Stephen W. Walker [mailto:steve@walkerfinancialinc.com] 

Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 1:56 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: 1210-AB32

Please reconsider placing further regulation on advisors' fiduciary requirements. The reality is 

that conscientious advisors are going to put the interests of their clients first regardless of any 

regulations. You cannot legislate ethical behavior or morality and the "bad apples" are going to 

do what they do regardless of regulation. They may find ways to skirt regulation but they will 

still succeed. Enforcement of current laws and regulation are enough to protect the public 

without submitting all advisors to more unnecessary regulatory concerns.

In a macro sense, the U.S. is so much more regulated than any other country in the world. 

Excessive regulation makes it more difficult to compete in a world economy. Our economy is 

already so regulated that we are at a competitive disadvantage to the rest of the world. The cost 

to abide by additional regulation as well the cost to enforce the increased regulations are at 

diminishing return on the prludent use of our resources. Please do not decrease our efficiency 

further with increased regulation.

Thank you for your consideration of my simple yet "to the point" remarks.

Stephen W. Walker

770-614-2920

Stephen W. Walker, CFP

Securities & Investment Advice offered through G.A. Repple & Company

A Registered Broker/Dealer & Investment Advisor

Member FINRA & SIPC 

101 Normandy Road, Casselberry, FL 32707

(407)339-9090
§ 237.3 Responsibility for compliance. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, an owner of track to which this part applies is responsible for compliance.
( b ) If an owner of track to which this part applies assigns responsibility for the bridges that carry the track to another person (by lease or otherwise), written notification of the assignment shall be provided to the appropriate FRA Regional Office at least 30 days in advance of the assignment. The notification may be made by any party to that assignment, but shall be in writing and include the following— ( 1 ) The name and address of the track owner;
( 2 ) The name and address of the person to whom responsibility is assigned (assignee);
( 3 ) A statement of the exact relationship between the track owner and the assignee;
( 4 ) A precise identification of the track segment and the individual bridges in the assignment;
( 5 ) A statement as to the competence and ability of the assignee to carry out the bridge safety duties of the track owner under this part; and
( 6 ) A statement signed by the assignee acknowledging the assignment to him of responsibility for purposes of compliance with this part.
( c ) The Administrator may hold the track owner or the assignee, or both, responsible for compliance with this part and subject to penalties under § 237.7.
( d ) A common carrier by railroad which is directed by the Surface Transportation Board to provide service over the track of another railroad under 49 U.S.C. 11123 is considered the owner of that track for the purposes of the application of this part during the period the directed service order remains in effect.
( e ) When any person, including a contractor for a railroad or track owner, performs any function required by this part, that person is required to perform that function in accordance with this part.
( f ) Where an owner of track to which this part applies has previously assigned responsibility for a segment of track to another person as prescribed in 49 CFR 213.5(c), additional notification to FRA is not required.
( g ) FRA reserves the right to reject an assignment of responsibility under § 237.3(b) for cause shown.
EXHIBIT 23






                                FIRSTENERGY CORP.

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-48587 and 333-102074) and Form S-8 (Nos.
333-48651, 333-56094, 333-58279, 333-67798, 333-72764, 333-72766, 333-72768,
333-75985, 333-81183, 333-89356 and 333-101472) of FirstEnergy Corp. of our
report dated February 28, 2003 relating to the consolidated financial
statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Stockholders, which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 28, 2003 relating to the
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 24, 2003
SUPREME COURT.

#### Margaret N. Peck agt. Grey C. Hotchkiss and others.

*Special Term,*

*December,*1874.

*Answer of another suit pending.*

*It is*a good answer to an action for seizing property *under*an attachment, that the suit in which the attachment was issued is still pending; and this, though the plaintiff’s complaint in the attachment suit was dismissed, if an appeal from the judgment of dismissal has keen duly taken, and the appeal he pending undetermined.

Demurrer to answer.

*Niles & Bagley,*for plaintiff.

*Payne & Lewis,*for defendants.

Van Vorst, J.

As a principal ground of the plaintiff’s cause of action, it is averred, in the complaint, that the action in which the attachment was issued, under which the plaintiff’s property was seized, was dismissed in the court out of which the attachment issued, with costs, and that judgment was rendered in favor of this plaintiff, who was the defendant in the attachment suit.

The defendants, however, in their answer to the complaint herein, while they admit that such judgment of dismissal was rendered in the attachment suit, allege that they have, within the period prescribed by law, duly appealed from said judgment to the general term of the court, and have executed and filed the proper undertaking required on such appeal, and that said appeal is still pending and is. undetermined.

*227The pendency of such appeal is matter proper to he set up as a defense to this action. For it may be that the judgment appealed from may be reversed, and it may yet be determined in the action that the same was maintainable, and the attachment properly and legally issued and levied.

The plaintiff having based her cause of action upon the seizure of her property under the attachment, until it be formally adjudicated, in the action in which the attachment was issued, that the plaintiffs therein had no cause of action against the plaintiff in this suit, and no valid ground for the issuance of the attachment, their proceedings cannot be called unlawful in taking the property in question under the process in that action.

The plaintiff’s cause of action becomes complete only when final judgment is rendered in his favor in the attachment suit. But with an appeal pending the judgment of dismissal cannot be considered final, nor the action to be ended. Nor can we try here, for the purposes of this action, the merits of the suit in which the attachment was issued ; nor give them any available consideration as long as that action is undetermined.

There should be judgment for the defendant on the demurrer, with costs.
EXHIBIT
23.3

















PENNSYLVANIA
ELECTRIC COMPANY





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Nos.
333-62295, 333-62295-01, and 333-62295-02) of Pennsylvania Electric Company of
our report dated February 28, 2008 relating to the financial statements, which
appears in the Annual Report to Stockholders, which is incorporated in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report dated February 28, 2008 relating to the financial statement
schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.














PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP





Cleveland,
OH


February 28,
2008
#### § 236.711 Bond, rail joint.

A metallic connection attached to adjoining rails to insure electrical conductivity.