alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: vanilaz@email.com [mailto:vanilaz@email.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 7:21 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

zachary williams 

2531 polk str 

hollywood, FL 33020
§ 72.10-45 Weather deck communications. ( a ) Vertical communication shall be provided between the various weather decks by means of permanent inclined ladders. Where ladders are for the exclusive use of the crew for rapid communication, and do not form part of a normal escape route, vertical ladders may be employed.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### § 214.320 Roadway maintenance machine movements over signalized non-controlled track.

Working limits must be established for roadway maintenance machine movements on non-controlled track equipped with automatic block signal systems over which trains are permitted to exceed restricted speed (for purposes of this section, on-track movements prepared to stop within on-half the range of vision but not exceeding 25 mph). This section applies unless the railroad's operating rules protect the movements of roadway maintenance machines in a manner equivalent to that provided for by limiting all train and locomotive movements to restricted speed, and such equivalent level of protection is first approved in writing by FRA's Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety and Chief Safety Officer.

[81 FR 37887, June 10, 2016]
§ 232.217 Train brake tests conducted using yard air. ( a ) When a train air brake system is tested from a yard air source, an engineer's brake valve or a suitable test device shall be used to provide any increase or reduction of brake pipe air pressure at the same, or slower, rate as an engineer's brake valve.
( b ) The yard air test device must be connected to the end of the train or block of cars that will be nearest to the controlling locomotive. However, if the railroad adopts and complies with written procedures to ensure that potential overcharge conditions to the train brake system are avoided, the yard air test device may be connected to other than the end nearest to the controlling locomotive.
( c ) Except as provided in this section, when yard air is used the train air brake system must be charged and tested as prescribed by § 232.205(c) and when practicable should be kept charged until road motive power is coupled to train, after which, a Class III brake test shall be performed as prescribed by § 232.211. ( 1 ) If the cars are off-air for more than 24 hours, the cars must be retested in accordance with § 232.205(c) through (f).
( 2 ) At a minimum, yard air pressure shall be 60 psi at the end of the consist or block of cars opposite from the yard test device and shall be within 15 psi of the regulator valve setting on yard test device.
( 3 ) If the air pressure of the yard test device is less than 80 psi, then a brake pipe leakage or air flow test shall be conducted at the operating pressure of the train when the locomotives are attached in accordance with § 232.205(c)(1).
( d ) Mechanical yard air test devices and gauges shall be calibrated every 92 days. Electronic yard test devices and gauges shall be calibrated annually. Mechanical and electronic yard air test devices and gauges shall be calibrated so that they are accurate to within ±3 psi.
( e ) If used to test a train, a yard air test device and any yard air test equipment shall be accurate and function as intended.
[66 FR 4193, Jan. 17, 2001, as amended at 67 FR 17583, Apr. 10, 2002; 85 FR 80573, Dec. 11, 2020]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 168 (Thursday, August 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 50159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4249]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


First Meeting, RTCA Special Committee 216: Aeronautical System 
Security

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 216 meeting Aeronautical 
Systems Security.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 216: Aeronautical Systems Security.

DATES: The meeting will be held on October 10-11, 2007, from 8 a.m. to 
5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036-5133.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC, 2036-5133; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax 
(202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 2216 meeting. The agenda will 
include:

<bullet> October 10-11:
<bullet> Opening Session (Welcome, Introductory and Administrative 
Remarks, Agenda Overview).
<bullet> RTCA Functional Overview.
<bullet> Industry Activities Related to Security-Review.
<bullet> Committee Scope--Terms of Reference.
    <bullet> Presentation, Discussion, Recommendations.
<bullet> European Security Initiatives-Overview.
<bullet> Organization of Work, Assign Tasks and Workgroups.
    <bullet> Presentation, Discussion, Recommendations.
    <bullet> Assignment of Responsibilities.
<bullet> Consider/Review Liaison with Other Active Committees.
<bullet> Closing Session (Other Business, Assignment/Review of Future 
Work, Establish Agenda, Date and Place of Next Meeting, Closing 
Remarks, Adjourn).

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 21, 2007.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 07-4249 Filed 8-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### Mildred Cohen, Respondent, *v.*Consolidated Gas Company of New York, Appellant.

*Cohen*v. *Consolidated Gas Co.,*137 App. Div. 213, affirmed.

(Argued May 18, 1911;

decided June 6, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 11,1910, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and granting a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the ngligence of defendant.

*John A. Garver*for appellant.

*Nicholas W. Hacker*and *James C. Foley*for respondent.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ. Not sitting: Gray, J.
-----Original Message----- 

From: mlopez@slvmhc.org [mailto:mlopez@slvmhc.org] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 12:48 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Manuel Lopez 

718 Weber Dr. 

Alamosa, CO 81101
Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David H. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Thomas L. Redding, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David H. GillDavid H. Gill, President and CEO(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Thomas L. ReddingThomas L. Redding, Sr. Vice President and CFO(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


Date: November 7, 2007



24
#### § 230.79 Train signal system.

Where utilized, the train signal system, or any other form of on-board communication, shall be tested and known to be in safe and suitable condition for service at the beginning of each day the locomotive is used.
#### Peter Chapman, Appellant, v. Edwin P. Bassett, Respondent.

Order reversed, without coste, ¡fcje opinion in Meyer v. Rasquin.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Somanetics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
we, Bruce J. Barrett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
William M. Iacona, Vice President, Finance, Controller, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Dated: October 12, 2005                 /s/ Bruce J. Barrett
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Bruce J. Barrett, President and Chief
                                        Executive Officer


Dated: October 12, 2005                 /s/ William M. Iacona
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        William M. Iacona, Vice President,
                                        Finance, Controller, Treasurer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2

Certification Pursuant To

Rule 13A-14(a) or 15D-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jerry Kieliszak, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chyron Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) reserved - not effective;



c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and







5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.









Date: March 31, 2005







|/s/ Jerry Kieliszak      
|-------------------------
|Jerry Kieliszak          
|Senior Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer
#### The State Of Delaware, on the relation of Edward Carpenter, Plaintiff, v. Willard D. Boyce, being Treasurer of the State of Delaware, and Edward W. Cooch, J. Gordon Smith and Frederic K. Lamb, being the Members of and Constituting the State Pension Board, Defendants.

*(December*8, 1949.)

Layton, J., sitting.

*David B. Coxe, Jr.,*for Plaintiff.

*C. Edward Duffy*(James L. Latchum of Counsel) for Defendants.

Superior Court for New Castle County,

No. 588,

Civil Action, 1949.

*142Layton, Judge.

The question presented by this motion is whether or not the Statute of Limitations of three years has run against Plaintiff’s claim. In my opinion it has. *Dillon v. Board of Pension Commis*
      *143
      *sioners,*18 *Cal.*2d 427, 116 *P.*2d 37, 136 *A. L. R.*800; *Barney v. City of Lincoln,*144 *Neb.*537, 13 *N. W.*2d 870.

Plaintiff relies upon a line of authorities which superficially support his position. Upon closer examination, however, the facts of these cases reveal that, prior to the bringing of petitioner’s suit to recover his pension, his right thereto had been established. *Dryden v. Board of Pension Commissioners, 6 Cal.*2d 575, 59 *P.*2d 104; *Donnellan v. O’Dwyer,*189 *Misc.*121, 67 *N. Y.*S. 2d 642. This distinguishing feature is clearly apparent, and is commented on at length, in the Dillon case, 116 P. 2d at page 40, 136 A. L. R. 800. See also 189 *Misc.*121., 67 *N. Y. S. 2d at page*650.1 What the result would be here had Plaintiff established his right to a pension within three years of his retirement and then failed to institute an action to recover an installment for more than three years thereafter is a question not raised by this motion.

For the reasons just stated I have no alternative but to grant-the motion to dismiss.

. Tyre v. Board of Police and Fire Pension Commissioners. 197 Pac. 2d 710 (712, 713) clearly reveals the distinction between the Dillon and Dryden cases. . - - ■ . . .
-----Original Message----- 

From: annhitchins@yahoo.com [mailto:annhitchins@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 9:32 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 30, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ann Hitchins 

331 West Cliveden St. 

Philadelphia, PA 19119
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 28, 1995 (122), Para 122.24 H. Res. 231--Unfinished Business]
[Page 1465]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.122.24  h. res. 231--unfinished business

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HEFLEY, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced the unfinished business to be the question on agreeing to the 
resolution (H. Res. 231) waiving points of order against the conference 
report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2126) making appropriations for the 
Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and 
for other purposes.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House agree to said resolution?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HEFLEY, announced that the yeas had it.
  Mr. BEILENSON demanded a recorded vote on agreeing to said resolution, 
which demand was supported by one-fifth of a quorum, so a recorded vote 
was ordered.
  The vote was taken by electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

251

affirmative

Nays

171
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2385

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the exclusion

for gain from certain small business stock to 100 percent for stock

held for more than 10 years.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 21, 1995

Mr. MCHALE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the exclusion for gain from certain small business stock

to 100 percent for stock held for more than 10 years.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Capital Gains Exclu5 sion Expansion Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 2385 IH

1 SEC. 2. 100 PERCENT EXCLUSION FOR GAIN FROM CERTAIN

2 SMALL BUSINESS STOCK HELD FOR MORE

3 THAN 10 YEARS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 1202 of

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 50-percent

6 exclusion for gain from certain small business stock) is

7 amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘In the case

8 of qualified small business stock held for more than 10

9 years, the preceding sentence shall be applied by substitut10 ing ‘100 percent’ for ‘50 percent’. Subsections (g)(2) and

11 (h)(1) shall be applied by substituting ‘10 years’ for ‘5

12 years’ for purposes of determining whether stock is de13 scribed in the preceding sentence.’’

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

15 subsection (a) shall apply to stock issued after August 10,

16 1993.

Æ
#### § 230.66 Design, construction, and maintenance.

The steam locomotive owner and operator are responsible for the general design, construction and maintenance of the steam locomotives and tenders under their control.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2366

AN ACT

To repeal an unnecessary medical device reporting

requirement.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL.

4 Section 1862 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

5 1395y) is amended by striking subsection (h).

Passed the House of Representatives November 14,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2366

AN ACT

To repeal an unnecessary medical device reporting

requirement.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 10, 1995 (125), Para 125.22 Adjournment]
[Page 1498]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.125.22  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. WAMP, pursuant to the special order agreed to on 
September 29, 1995, at 6 o'clock and 20 minutes p.m., the House 
adjourned until 8 o'clock a.m. on Wednesday, October 11, 1995.
```