alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5125-N-02]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         January 12, 2007.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free); or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: January 4, 2007.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 07-37 Filed 1-11-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-M
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 5/18/15 2:59 PM

Received: May 18, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8ix1-mgvg

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0277

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Hello - I believe that financial advisors should be required to give advice that is in the best 

interest of their clients - similar to a doctor. This is the moral thing to do. With the absence of 

pensions, everyone is now required to save for his or her own retirement. But we do not have 

the expertise to determine if our financial advisors are suggesting options that are in our best 

interest or not. Ultimately, if people do not save enough for their own retirement, the tax payers 

will be picking up the bill in some form. So, what I see is a transfer of wealth from all of the tax 

payers of the country to a few unscrupulous financial advisors. Please end this situation, and 

make ensure that financial advisors are acting in the best interest of their clients. Thank you.

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481ae5753&format=xml&show... 5/18/2015
Exhibit
4
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul O.
Richins, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 /s/
Paul O. Richins
 Paul O.
Richins
 Principal
Financial Officer
 August 7,
2008
 
 
 A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
-----Original Message----- 

From: moonhorse66@msn.com [mailto:moonhorse66@msn.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 4:45 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Tania Coletta Eisenstadt 

16 Cullen Hill Road 

Huntington, MA 01050
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Nov-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Aug-31-1997
<CASH>                        7,123,980
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 000
<ALLOWANCES>                  2,762,015
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              53,504
<PP&E>                        000
<DEPRECIATION>                000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                21,157,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         422,269
<BONDS>                       000
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    22,339,983
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  22,762,252
<SALES>                       1,920,909
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              2,631,610
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 1,006,607
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              215,929
<LOSS-PROVISION>              616,839
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               2,510,927
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           2,510,927
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  2,510,927
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 25.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                 25.45
        

</TABLE>
#### § 236.770 Locomotive.

A self-propelled unit of equipment which can be used in train service.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 11.1

<TABLE>
                                      COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<CAPTION>
                                                        Three Months Ended              Six Months Ended
                                                             June 30,                       June 30,
                                                    -------------------------      -------------------------
                                                        2002          2001             2002          2001
                                                    -----------    ----------      -----------    ----------
                                                   (As restated)                  (As restated)
                                                         (In thousands, except share and per share data)
<S>                                                 <C>            <C>             <C>            <C>
Average common shares outstanding...........         15,698,542     8,912,501       15,538,832     8,868,572
Average common stock equivalents of
   options outstanding - based on the
   treasury stock method using market
   price....................................            391,405        65,199          343,356        63,803
                                                    -----------    ----------      -----------    ----------
Average diluted common shares outstanding...         16,088,947     8,977,700       15,882,188     8,932,375
                                                    ===========    ==========      ===========    ==========

Net income..................................        $     5,398    $    2,804      $    10,346    $    5,365

Basic earnings per common share.............               0.34          0.31             0.67          0.60

Diluted earnings per common share...........               0.34          0.31             0.65          0.60
</TABLE>



                                     31
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Long Acre Electric Light and Power Company, Respondent, *v.*The Public Service Commission for the First District of the State of New York et al., Appellants.

(Submitted October 24, 1910;

decided November 22, 1910.)

Motion for re-argument of motion to dismiss appeal denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 199 N. Y. 254.)
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 24, 1995 (133), Para 133.25 Hour of Meeting]
[Page 1586]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.133.25  hour of meeting

  On motion of Mr. SOLOMON, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That when the House adjourns on Wednesday, October 25, 1995, 
it adjourn to meet at 9 o'clock a.m. on Thursday, October 26, 1995.
```
Aldabra
Acquisition Corporation

c/o Terrapin Partners LLC

Rockefeller Center
620 Fifth Avenue
3rd Floor
 New York,
New York 10020

March 16,
2006                        

Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company

17 Battery Place
 New York, New York 10004
 Attn: Steven G.
Nelson
    
 Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc.
 600 Fifth
Avenue
 19th Floor
 New York, New York 10020

Attn:    Mike Powell

Re:        Investment
Management Trust Agreement


Gentlemen:

Reference is made to that certain Investment Management Trust
Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of
February 17, 2005, between Aldabra Acquisition Corporation
("Company") and Continental Stock Transfer
& Trust Company. Section 1(c) is hereby deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:

"(c) In a timely
manner, upon the instruction of the Company, to invest and reinvest the
Property in United States "government
securities" within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 having a maturity of 180 days or less,
and/or in any open ended investment company registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 that holds itself out as a money market
fund selected by the Company meeting the conditions of paragraphs
(c)(2), (c)(3) and (c)(4) of Rule 2a-7 promulgated under the Investment
Company Act of 1940; as determined by the
Company;"








Except as indicated above, the Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect.





											
	 		ALDABRA
ACQUISITION CORPORATION
	 		By:		/s/ Jason
Weiss
	 		 		Name:
Jason Weiss
 Title: Chief Executive
Officer
	






Acknowledged and agreed this

16th day of March, 2006

CONTINENTAL
STOCK TRANSFER &
 TRUST COMPANY

		
	By: 	/s/ Steven Nelson


Name:    Steven Nelson
 Title:    Chairman


The undersigned is required to consent to this
amendment pursuant to Section 5(c) of the Investment Management Trust
Agreement and hereby does so.

MORGAN JOSEPH & CO.
INC.

		
	By: 	/s/ Michael
Powell

 Name:    Michael Powell
 Title:    Managing
Director
§ 209.101 Civil penalties generally. ( a ) Sections 209.101 through 209.121 prescribe rules of procedure for the assessment of civil penalties pursuant to the Federal hazardous materials transportation safety law, 49 U.S.C. Chapter 51.
( b ) When the FRA has reason to believe that a person has knowingly committed an act which is a violation of any provision of subchapter B or C of chapter I, subtitle B of this title for which the FRA exercises enforcement responsibility or any waiver or order issued thereunder, it may conduct a proceeding to assess a civil penalty.
[42 FR 56742, Oct. 28, 1977, as amended at 61 FR 38646, July 25, 1996]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7931

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WAYNE KEITH BARNES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CR-97-337, CA-00-1488-4-22)

Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Keith Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea,

Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Keith Barnes seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. United States v. Barnes, Nos. CR-97-337; CA00-1488-4-22 (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
-----Original Message----- 

From: AARP [mailto:aarpwebact@action.aarp.org] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 6:21 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: STOP Adding More Useless and Costly Regulations

May 5, 2015

Department of Labor

Dear Labor,

To the Department of Labor:

Millions of Americans like me are counting on our 401(k)s and retirement accounts for a secure financial 

future -- and we've worked hard to build and grow our savings.

All Americans should be free to choose their own financial adviser WITHOUT government interference. 

Doesn't matter if they pick a super, fee-only MBA with a stellar track record (that' my pick) or a traveling 

Gypsy with an old Mustang for an office. It's OUR choice, not yours or the Government's.

And do you really think that more intrusive regulation will eliminate shysters and hucksters in the 

financial world? I say NO!. They will figure out another path to the their targets. No matter how many 

new regulations you create (especially ones favoring the DoL) it will only raise the cost and complexity of 

investing for everyone. Just stop it!

And anyway, what the is DoL doing in the middle of this debate anyway?

I'm counting on you to butt out.

Sincerely, 

Mr. Marc Williams

209 N 6th St

Fernandina Beach, FL 32034
-----Original Message----- 

From: suncat13@me.com [mailto:suncat13@me.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:21 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Christopher Bingham 

12523 SW 297th Way 

vashon, WA 98070
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.2


Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Max & Erma's, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending February 16, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
C. Niegsch, Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr.
-----------------------------------
William C. Niegsch, Jr.




March 20, 2003
§ 23.53 How do car rental companies count ACDBE participation toward their goals? ( a ) As a car rental company, you may, in meeting the goal the airport has set for you, include purchases or leases of vehicles from any vendor that is a certified ACDBE.
( b ) As a car rental company, if you choose to meet the goal the airport has set for you by including purchases or leases of vehicles from an ACDBE vendor, you must also submit to the recipient documentation of the good faith efforts you have made to obtain ACDBE participation from other ACDBE providers of goods and services.
( c ) While this part does not require you to obtain ACDBE participation through direct ownership arrangements, you may count such participation toward the goal the airport has set for you.
( d ) The following special rules apply to counting participation related to car rental operations: ( 1 ) Count the entire amount of the cost charged by an ACDBE for repairing vehicles, provided that it is reasonable and not excessive as compared with fees customarily allowed for similar services.
( 2 ) Count the entire amount of the fee or commission charged by an ACDBE to manage a car rental concession under an agreement with the concessionaire toward ACDBE goals, provided that it is reasonable and not excessive as compared with fees customarily allowed for similar services.
( 3 ) Do not count any portion of a fee paid by a manufacturer to a car dealership for reimbursement of work performed under the manufacturer's warranty.
( e ) For other goods and services, count participation toward ACDBE goals as provided in part 26, § 26.55 and § 23.55 of this part. In the event of any conflict between these two sections, § 23.55 controls.
( f ) If you have a national or regional contract, count a pro-rated share of the amount of that contract toward the goals of each airport covered by the contract. Use the proportion of your applicable gross receipts as the basis for making this pro-rated assignment of ACDBE participation.
Example to paragraph (f): Car Rental Company X signs a regional contract with an ACDBE car dealer to supply cars to all five airports in a state. The five airports each account for 20 percent of X's gross receipts in the state. Twenty percent of the value of the cars purchased through the ACDBE car dealer would count toward the goal of each airport.
[70 FR 14508, Mar. 22, 2005, as amended at 89 FR 24962, Apr. 9, 2024]
Exhibit
10.14

 SUMMARY OF CONSULTING AGREEMENT FOR
RICHARD W. WRIGHT 

Effective August
12,  2005, James River Group, Inc. and Richard W. Wright,
Chairman, entered into an oral consulting agreement. Pursuant to this
agreement, Mr. Wright receives an annual fee of $40,000 for his
consulting services. This agreement may be terminated by either party
with 90 days written notice.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 129 (Friday, July 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 36963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3289]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 19 July 2007, at 10 a.m. in the Commission's offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: http://www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding 
the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address, or call 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign 
language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the 
Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.

    Dated in Washington, DC, 28 June 2007.
Thomas Leubke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-3289 Filed 07-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           OMEGA FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      This certification is intended to accompany Omega Financial Corporation's
(the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September
30, 2003 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. To the best of my knowledge, I, David B. Lee, hereby certify in my
capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


Date: October 29, 2003                               /s/ David B. Lee
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     David B. Lee
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.


                                       19