alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Ginger B. LaChapelle [mailto:gblachapelle@bklawyers.com] 

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 12:01 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comments on the Paul wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity 

Act of 2009

To Whom It May Concern:

Please clarify:

For a plan that includes coverage for both mental health and substance use disorder benefits

must the  financial requirements and treatment limitations (which are no less restrictive for

those for medical and surgical benefits) be applied separately to each benefit (for example – 20

visits for medical/surgical, 20 visits for mental health, and 20 visits for substance use disorder

benefits), or may they be aggregated for the mental health and substance use disorder benefits

(for example – 20 visits for medical/surgical and 20 visits for mental health/substance use

disorder)?

Thank you,

Ginger LaChapelle

Ginger B. LaChapelle

BLITMAN & KING LLP  

800 Troy‐Schenectady Road, 2nd Floor

Latham New York 12110‐2424 

T: 518.785.4387 | F:  | E: gblachapelle@bklawyers.com | www.bklawyers.com

Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain

confidential and/or privileged information which is protected by the attorney‐client or other privileges. If you are not the intended recipient, you are

hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If

you have received this transmission in error, Please notify the sender immediately by e‐mail and delete the original message.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To comply with recent IRS rules, we must inform you that this message, and any attachments, if they contain advice relating

to federal taxes, are not intended or written to be used, and they cannot be used for (1) the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under

federal tax law; or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax‐related matter addressed herein. Under these IRS rules, a

taxpayer may rely on professional advice to avoid federal tax penalties only if that advice is reflected in a comprehensive tax opinion that conforms to

stringent requirements under federal law.
#### § 214.305 [Reserved]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 31, 1995 (105), Para 105.33 Adjournment of Congress]
[Page 1232]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.105.33  adjournment of congress

  Mr. SENSENBRENNER, by unanimous consent, submitted the following 
concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 89):

       Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
     concurring), That, notwithstanding the provisions of section 
     132(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 
     U.S.C. 198(a)), the House of Representatives and the Senate 
     shall not adjourn for a period in excess of three days, or 
     adjourn sine die, until both Houses of Congress have adopted 
     a concurrent resolution providing either for an adjournment 
     (in excess of three days) to a day certain or for adjournment 
     sine die.

  When said concurrent resolution was considered and agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said concurrent resolution was 
agreed to was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
concurrent resolution.
```
§ 179.220-22 Closure for openings. ( a ) All plugs must be solid, with NPT threads, and must be of a length which will screw at least six threads inside the face of fitting or tank. Plugs, when inserted from the outside of the outer shell tank heads, must have the letter “S” at least three-eighths inch in size stamped with steel stamp or cast on the outside surface to indicate the plug is solid.
( b ) Openings in the outer shell used during construction for installation must be closed in an approved manner.
[Amdt. 179-9, 36 FR 21343, Nov. 6, 1971]
Visual Observer 

Training Procedures

Training Procedures
Overview

 Initial Qualifications Check – (5 Minutes)

 Medical

 In-Person Interview (30 Minutes)

 Mental Check

 Establish an understanding for the importance of the role

 Discussion of the responsibilities assigned to the role

 Visual Observance – Learning Seminar (60 Minutes)

 What is perception?

 How is it influenced?

 Strategies of Observance

 Classroom Training (90 Minutes)

 Introduction to the Role

 Responsibilities Review

 Terminology

 FAA Regulation Review for Applicable Airspace

 COA Provisions Review

 Flight Training (20 Hours Total)

 Real World Simulations with Person In Command

 PIC will need to perform 20 hrs. of Flight Training and w/ exemption, will be required to have a VO, so the PIC and VO will 

train together for flight training and thus have the same hours. 
Initial Qualifications Check

 Initial Medical Check

 Preliminary check to make sure Visual Observer meets qualification standards

 Medical Check

 All observers must have a valid Class 2 Medical from the FAA or equivalent

 Will accept a valid U.S. Drivers license as that is currently considered an equivalent for the 

Person In Command of the Aircraft
In-Person Interview

 Mental Check

 Establish an understanding of the importance of the VO role

 Why are VO’s necessary?

 Why do they need training?

 VO’s are crewmembers

 Mission-Critical Responsibilities

 Assessment of airspace

 Air traffic

 Obstacles

 Flight Hazards

 Ensure the safety of sUAS flights

 Avoid manned aircraft

 Prevent accidents with obstacles

 Prevent hazards/notify PIC of hazards
Visual Observance – Learning Seminar

 Learning Objectives

 Challenges to human visual perception 

 Limits of human visual perception 

 Describe how orientation, context, and extraneous cues impact our visual 

perception

 Describe how relative motion, altered light angles, contrast, and loss of depth cues 

can impact visual perception 
Classroom Training

 Classroom – PowerPoint and/or Video Training Module

 Introduction to the Role

 What is a Visual Observer?

 Responsibilities Review

 Ensure the Safety of the Flights

 Terminology

 Return to Home

 Land Immediately

 Avoidance Dive

 FAA Regulation Review for Applicable Airspace

 Right of Way

 Weather Minimums

 Operations near other aircraft

 COA Provisions Review

 Height, Weight, Speed, Proximity Rules, etc.
Flight Training

 Person In Command/Visual Observer Joint Operations

 Review Pre-Flight Checklists

 Review Aircraft Maintenance

 Review Weather Minimum Rules and make current weather observation

 Review flight logs and log the flights

 Take-Offs & Landings

 In-Flight Operations and Communication

 Evasive Maneuvers

 Emergency Action Plan Steps and Execution
Questions?

 Please contact:

 Document Preparer –

DMZ Marketing, LLC.

Zach Fiene

1501 Parkview Court

Prairie du Sac, WI 53578

USA

 dmzaerial@gmail.com

 (608) 370-2858
-----Original Message----- 

From: kengdahl@metcalf-law.com [mailto:kengdahl@metcalf-law.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:41 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

Mental health and addiction recovery are every bit as important as 

physical health -- and in some respects more important, because they 

can become the foundation for self-care so important to families. 

Sincerely, 

Kathryn Engdahl 

19 Hall Lane 

St. Paul, MN 55107
###### Editorial Note on Part 195

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.8 Transportation of hazardous liquid or carbon dioxide in pipelines constructed with other than steel pipe.

No person may transport any hazardous liquid or carbon dioxide through a pipe that is constructed after October 1, 1970, for hazardous liquids or after July 12, 1991 for carbon dioxide of material other than steel unless the person has notified the Administrator in writing at least 90 days before the transportation is to begin. The notice must state whether carbon dioxide or a hazardous liquid is to be transported and the chemical name, common name, properties and characteristics of the hazardous liquid to be transported and the material used in construction of the pipeline. If the Administrator determines that the transportation of the hazardous liquid or carbon dioxide in the manner proposed would be unduly hazardous, he will, within 90 days after receipt of the notice, order the person that gave the notice, in writing, not to transport the hazardous liquid or carbon dioxide in the proposed manner until further notice.

[Amdt. 195-45, 56 FR 26925, June 12, 1991, as amended by Amdt. 195-50, 59 FR 17281, Apr. 12, 1994]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, October 25, 1995 (134), Para 134.6 Providing for Consideration of Conference Report on H.R. 2002]
[Page 1589]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.134.6  providing for consideration of conference report on h.r. 
          2002

  Mrs. WALDHOLTZ, by direction of the Committee on Rules, called up the 
following resolution (H. Res. 241):

       Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be 
     in order to consider the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R. 2002) making appropriations for the Department of 
     Transportation and related agencies for the fiscal year 
     ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes. All points 
     of order against the conference report and against its 
     consideration are waived. 

  When said resolution was considered.
  After debate,
  On motion of Mrs. WALDHOLTZ, the previous question was ordered on the 
resolution to its adoption or rejection and under the operation thereof, 
the resolution was agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said resolution was agreed to 
was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 24, 1995 (133), Para 133.27 Committees and Subcommittees to Sit]
[Page 1586]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.133.27  committees and subcommittees to sit

  On motion of Mr. SOLOMON, by unanimous consent, the following 
committees and their subcommittees were granted permission to sit during 
the 5-minute rule on Wednesday, October 25, 1995: the Committee on 
Agriculture, the Committee on Banking and Financial Services, the 
Committee on Commerce, the Committee on Economic and Educational 
Opportunities, the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, the 
Committee on House Oversight, the Committee on International Relations, 
the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Resources, the 
Committee on Science, the Committee on Small Business, and the Committee 
on Veterans' Affairs.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 10, 1995 (125), Para 125.23 Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1498]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.125.23  public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 5 of rule X and clause 4 of rule XXII, public bills and 
resolutions were introduced and severally referred as follows:

           By Ms. DUNN of Washington (for herself, Mr. Shaw, Mr. 
             Blute, Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. Torkildsen, 
             and Mr. LaTourette):
       H.R. 2452. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 
     1986 to provide for the treatment of excess benefit 
     arrangements of certain tax-exempt group medical practices, 
     and for other purposes; to the Committee on Ways and Means.
           By Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts:
       H.R. 2453. A bill to amend title 18, United States Code, to 
     increase speedy trial time limits; to the Committee on the 
     Judiciary.
           By Mr. THORNBERRY:
       H.R. 2454. A bill to eliminate automatic pay adjustments 
     for Members of Congress; to the Committee on House Oversight, 
     and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform and 
     Oversight, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
     Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
     fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
       H.R. 2455. A bill to require that travel awards that accrue 
     by reason of official travel of a Member, officer, or 
     employee of the Senate or House of Representatives be used 
     only for official travel or transferred to a qualified non-
     profit organization; to the Committee on House Oversight, and 
     in addition to the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by 
     the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
     provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
     concerned.
       H.R. 2456. A bill to amend title 5, United States Code, to 
     limit the number of years that a Member of Congress may 
     participate in either the Civil Service Retirement System or 
     the Federal Employees' Retirement System; to the Committee on 
     House Oversight, and in addition to the Committee on 
     Government Reform and Oversight, for a period to be 
     subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
     consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
     jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
```
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0611 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Phoebe Norton 

Address: 

4089 Spyglass Lane 

Longmont, CO, 80503 

Email: phoebenorton@comcast.net 

Phone: 303-444-5834 

Organization: HHS 

General Comment 

On behalf of NAMI Colorado, I am submitting comments on the Interim Final Rules under the 

Wellstone and Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 and so doing the 

National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) Colorado endorses the separate comments submitted 

by the Parity Implementation Committee and the National Alliance on Mental Illness. 

Phoebe Norton 

President, NAMI Colorado 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: April 29, 2010 

Received: April 29, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ae3642 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 4/29/2010
-----Original Message----- 

From: evasteege@wans.net [mailto:evasteege@wans.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 6:04 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

eva steege 

70 Cone Street 

Hartford, CT 06105
Exhibit 34.2


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company:





We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying “Report on assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Asset-Backed Securities”, that The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the asset-backed securities transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving phase-in recovery property (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2013 and for the period from June 20, 2013 to December 31, 2013, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(i-iv), 1122(d)(2)(i-vii), 1122(d)(3)(ii-iv), and 1122(d)(4)(i-v, vii, ix-xiii, xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform or the servicing activities are applicable to the Platform but are excluded from the scope of management's assertion and are not reported on herein.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2013 and for the period from June 20, 2013 to December 31, 2013 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.











/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP








March 31, 2014
#### § 238.127 Low-location emergency exit path marking.

On or after January 28, 2015, low-location emergency exit path marking shall be provided in each passenger car in accordance with the minimum requirements specified in APTA PR-PS-S-004-99, Rev. 2, “Standard for Low-Location Exit Path Marking,” Authorized October 7, 2007, or an alternative standard providing at least an equivalent level of safety, if approved by FRA pursuant to § 238.21. The incorporation by reference of this APTA standard was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. You may obtain a copy of the incorporated document from the American Public Transportation Association, 1666 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20006, *www.aptastandards.com.* You may inspect a copy of the document at the Federal Railroad Administration, Docket Clerk, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html*

[78 FR 71814, Nov. 29, 2013]
Exhibit
4





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Paul O. Richins, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/
Paul O. Richins


Paul O.
Richins


Principal
Financial Officer


November
7, 2008








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending November 23, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2014 (January 1, 2014 - March 31, 2014)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, August 3, 1995 (108), Para 108.25 Order of Business--Consideration of H.R. 1555]
[Page 1256]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.108.25  order of business--consideration of h.r. 1555

  On motion of Mr. ARMEY, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That the House convene at 8 o'clock a.m. today and that there 
be no intervening motion from the time of convening until the Pledge of 
Allegiance; and that further consideration of the bill (H.R. 1555) to 
promote competition and reduce regulation in order to secure lower 
prices and higher quality services for American telecommunications 
consumers and encourage the rapid deployment of new telecommunication 
technologies in the Committee of the Whole, pursuant to House Resolution 
207, shall also be governed by the following:
  (1) Immediately after the Pledge of Allegiance, the House shall 
resolve into the Committee of the Whole for the further consideration of 
H.R. 1555, pursuant to House Resolution 207, without intervening motion;
  (2) Consideration in the Committee of the Whole shall proceed without 
intervening motion except the amendments printed in House Report 104-
223, except one motion to rise, if offered by Mr. Bliley;
  (3) That any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole shall be 
deemed as having been adopted in the House; and
  (4) That Mr. Conyers shall have permission to modify amendment 
numbered 2-2.
```