alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 8, 1995 (112), Para 112.25 Deletions of Sponsors from Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1322]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.112.25  deletions of sponsors from public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were deleted from public bills 
and resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 359: Mr. Gekas.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 20, 1995 (118), Para 118.35 Discharge of Committee]
[Page 1427]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.118.35  discharge of committee

  Under clause 5 of rule X, the following action was taken by the 
Speaker:

       H.R. 1020. The Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure discharged.
```
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 4/27/15 11:24 AM

Received: April 23, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8ig4-623m

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: API

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0241

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: sara zehnder

Address: 

1262 saint charles street

alameda, CA, 94501

General Comment

Please do pass this proposal. 

I believe stricter requirements on the Broker Dealers, especially that they make investor 

interests primary over their own, will provide investors with a more reliable investment product. 

If the Broker Dealer is held to a higher standard and has more at stake, they will provide greater 

diligence and in turn require sponsors to adhere to a higher standard! 

For those of us who wish or need to continue making 1031 Exchange investments our only 

recourse is to work with a Broker Dealer.

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481ab52d6&format=xml&show... 4/27/2015
[Crim. No. 542.

Fourth Dist.

June 5, 1941.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. GEORGE DODSON, Appellant.

Harry L. Meyers for Appellant.

Earl Warren, Attorney-General, and Burdette J. Daniels, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

MARKS, J.

The Attorney-General has moved to affirm the judgment under the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code.

The clerk’s and reporter’s transcripts were filed here on April 14, 1941. On April 23, 1941, the attorney for defendant secured an order extending his time to file his opening brief to May 5, 1941. The case was placed on the calendar of May 27, 1941. No appearance was made for defendant and no brief in his behalf has been filed, so the motion must be granted.

The judgment is affirmed.

Barnard, P. J., and Griffin, J., concurred.
§ 240.5 Effect and construction. ( a ) FRA does not intend, by use of the term locomotive engineer in this part, to alter the terms, conditions, or interpretation of existing collective bargaining agreements that employ other job classification titles when identifying a person authorized by a railroad to operate a locomotive.
( b ) FRA does not intend by issuance of these regulations to alter the authority of a railroad to initiate disciplinary sanctions against its employees, including managers and supervisors, in the normal and customary manner, including those contained in its collective bargaining agreements.
( c ) Except as provided in § 240.308, nothing in this part shall be construed to create or prohibit an eligibility or entitlement to employment in other service for the railroad as a result of denial, suspension, or revocation of certification under this part.
( d ) Nothing in this part shall be deemed to abridge any additional procedural rights or remedies not inconsistent with this part that are available to the employee under a collective bargaining agreement, the Railway Labor Act, or (with respect to employment at will) at common law with respect to removal from service or other adverse action taken as a consequence of this part.
[85 FR 81307, Dec. 15, 2020]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 28, 1995 (122), Para 122.11 Three-Judge Court Review for State Referenda]
[Page 1462]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.122.11  three-judge court review for state referenda

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HEFLEY, pursuant to House Resolution 227 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the consideration of the bill 
(H.R. 1170) to provide that cases challenging the constitutionality of 
measures passed by State referendum be heard by a 3-judge court.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HEFLEY, by unanimous consent, designated 
Mr. EWING as Chairman of the Committee of the Whole; and after some time 
spent therein,
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. DREIER, assumed the Chair.
  When Mr. EWING, Chairman, reported that the Committee, having had 
under consideration said bill, had come to no resolution thereon.
```
#### § 25.440 Health and insurance benefits and services.

Subject to § 25.235(d), in providing a medical, hospital, accident, or life insurance benefit, service, policy, or plan to any of its students, a recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of sex, or provide such benefit, service, policy, or plan in a manner that would violate §§ 25.500 through 25.550 if it were provided to employees of the recipient. This section shall not prohibit a recipient from providing any benefit or service that may be used by a different proportion of students of one sex than of the other, including family planning services. However, any recipient that provides full coverage health service shall provide gynecological care.
Exhibit 35.2


COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


OF


THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY, AS SERVICER


The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the duly elected and acting Vice President and Treasurer of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, as servicer (the “ Servicer ”) under the Phase-In-Recovery Property Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2013 (the “ Servicing Agreement ”), between the Servicer and CEI Funding LLC, as Bond Issuer, and further certifies on behalf of the Servicer that:


|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement during the period that commenced January 1, 2014 and ended December 31, 2014 has been made under the supervision of the undersigned pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Servicing Agreement; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | To the undersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Servicing Agreement throughout the period that commenced January 1, 2014 and ended December 31, 2014.

Executed as of this 31 st day of March 2015.





THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANYBy:/s/ Steven R. StaubName:Steven R. StaubTitle:Vice President and Treasurer
Exhibit 21.5





                           METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                              AT DECEMBER 31, 2003




                                                                  STATE OF
   NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                       BUSINESS            ORGANIZATION
   ------------------                       --------            ------------


YORK HAVEN POWER COMPANY             HYDROELECTRIC GENERATION     NEW YORK

MET-ED PREFERRED CAPITAL II, INC.    SPECIAL-PURPOSE FINANCE      DELAWARE
  MET-ED CAPITAL II, L.P.            SPECIAL-PURPOSE FINANCE      DELAWARE
  MET-ED CAPITAL TRUST               SPECIAL-PURPOSE FINANCE      DELAWARE



Note:  Met-Ed, along with its affiliates JCP&L and Penelec, collectively own all
       of the  common  stock  of  Saxton  Nuclear  Experimental  Corporation,  a
       Pennsylvania  nonprofit  corporation  organized for nuclear  experimental
       purposes  which  is now  inactive.  The  carrying  value  of the  owners'
       investment has been written down to a nominal value.
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0699 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Jan Ford Mustin 

Address: 

4407 Bee Caves Rd. 

Suite 411 

Austin, TX, 78746 

Email: jfm@mustin.com 

Phone: 512-347-8100 

Organization: Peak Performance Institute 

General Comment 

I am in favor of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (Document ID EBSA2009-0010-0409) 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: May 03, 2010 

Received: May 03, 2010 

Status: DoNotPost 

Tracking No. 80ae5b3f 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 5/3/2010
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Somanetics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
I, Bruce J. Barrett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         2.       the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  October 1, 2002                  /s/ Bruce J. Barrett
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Bruce J. Barrett, President and Chief
                                         Executive Officer
-----Original Message----- 

From: robtoemik@gmail.com [mailto:robtoemik@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:53 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Danny Wertsbaugh 

1111 So. 6th st. 

Las Vegas, NV 89104
§ 178.604 Leakproofness test. ( a ) *General.* The leakproofness test must be performed with compressed air or other suitable gases on all packagings intended to contain liquids, except that: ( 1 ) The inner receptacle of a composite packaging may be tested without the outer packaging provided the test results are not affected; and
( 2 ) This test is not required for inner packagings of combination packagings.
( b ) *Number of packagings to be tested* — ( 1 ) *Production testing.* All packagings subject to the provisions of this section must be tested and must pass the leakproofness test: ( i ) Before they are first used in transportation; and
( ii ) Prior to reuse, when authorized for reuse by § 173.28 of this subchapter.
( 2 ) *Design qualification and periodic testing.* Three samples of each different packaging must be tested and must pass the leakproofness test. Exceptions for the number of samples used in conducting the leakproofness test are subject to the approval of the Associate Administrator.
( c ) *Special preparation* — ( 1 ) For design qualification and periodic testing, packagings must be tested with closures in place. For production testing, packagings need not have their closures in place. Removable heads need not be installed during production testing.
( 2 ) For testing with closures in place, vented closures must either be replaced by similar non-vented closures or the vent must be sealed.
( d ) *Test method.* The packaging must be restrained under water while an internal air pressure is applied; the method of restraint must not affect the results of the test. The test must be conducted, for other than production testing, for a minimum time of five minutes. Other methods, at least equally effective, may be used in accordance with appendix B of this part.
( e ) *Pressure applied.* An internal air pressure (gauge) must be applied to the packaging as indicated for the following packing groups: ( 1 ) Packing Group I: Not less than 30 kPa (4 psi).
( 2 ) Packing Group II: Not less than 20 kPa (3 psi).
( 3 ) Packing Group III: Not less than 20 kPa (3 psi).
( f ) *Criteria for passing the test.* A packaging passes the test if there is no leakage of air from the packaging.
[Amdt. 178-97, 55 FR 52723, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 66286, Dec. 20, 1991; Amdt. 178-106, 59 FR 67522, Dec. 29, 1994; 66 FR 45386, Aug. 28, 2001]
# TRE A-JXORNEY GENERAL OF T-EXAS
Auwr~~.Tmt~s 787ll

June 4, 1974 The Honorable Clayton T. Garrison Executive Director Texas Parks &Wildlife Department John H. Reagan Building Austin, Texas 78701 Opinion No. H- 318 Re: ,Authority ofParks and Wildlife Department to issue private bird shooting area license. Dear Mr. Garrison: You ask whether the Parks and Wildlife Department is authorized to issue private bird shooting area licenses which will remain in effect from the date ofissuance until the following August 31. Article 874a, Vernon’s Texas Penal Auxiliary Laws, was enacted by the 63rd Legislature in order toauthorize the establishment of private bird shooting areas. Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., ch. 171, p.386. A private bird shooting area is atract ofland of “not more than 300 contiguous acres onwhich privately owned or pen-reared game birds are banded and released to provide game bird shooting for all activities related to field dog competition and training andthe sport of shooting, hunting or taking privately owned or pen-reared game birds. ” Section 2, Art. 874a. Before aprivate bird shooting area can be established, the owner must obtain alicense from the Parks andWildlife Department. He is then entitled tohold in captivity game birds for use onthe area for which he is licensed. The boundaries ofaprivate bird shooting area must be clearly marked, and all game birds released in the area must be banded so as toindicate the permit number ofthe licensee. The hunting season onaprivate bird shooting area runs from January 1 through December 31 ofeach year, and only persons holding a valid Texas hunting license are permitted tohunt in such an area. While Art. 874a provides that thehunting season on aprivate bird shooting area is to run throughout theyear, itmakes no specific provision as to the duration ofaprivate bird shooting area license. This

p. 1471The Honorable Clayton T. Garrison, page 2 (H-318)

matter is left tothe discretion ofthe Parks and Wildlife Department. Under Art. 894, Vernon’s Texas Penal Auxiliary Laws, all hunting licenses issued bythe Department are to remain in effect from the date ofissuance until the last day ofthe following August. A similar duration is established for shooting resort and shooting preserve licenses under Art. 908, Vernon’s Texas Penal Auxiliary Laws. A private bird shooting area license is similar in nature tothese licenses and in our opinion, the Parks andWildlife Department is authorized, ifit chooses to do so, to issue it on similar terms. Thus. the Parks and Wildlife Department is authorized to issue private bird shooting area licenses which will remain in effect from the date ofissuance until the following August 31. SUMMARY The Parks and Wildlife Department is authorized, ifit chooses to do so, toissue private bird shooting area licenses which will remain in effect from the date ofissuance until the following August 31. y\ery truly yours.

Attorney General of Texas



# G&y DAVID M. KENDALL, Chairman Opinion Committee

p. 1472
Dismissed; Opinion Filed October 9, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-01095-CV

SOUTHERN MECHANICAL PLUMBING, INC., Appellant

V.

GCC MCCARTHY JOINT VENTURE IV, MCCARTHY BUILDING COMPANIES, 

INC., GCC ENTERPRISES, INC., AND WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-02769

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Evans, and Whitehill

Opinion by Justice Evans

Stating it does not wish to proceed with the appeal because the underlying dispute has 

been resolved, appellant has filed a motion to dismiss. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant 

the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id., 43.2(f).

151095F.P05

/David W. Evans/

DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

SOUTHERN MECHANICAL PLUMBING, 

INC., Appellant

No. 05-15-01095-CV V.

GCC MCCARTHY JOINT VENTURE IV, 

MCCARTHY BUILDING COMPANIES, 

INC., GCC ENTERPRISES, INC., AND 

WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-02769.

Opinion delivered by Justice Evans. Justices 

Lang and Whitehill participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER appellees GCC McCarthy Joint Venture IV, McCarthy Building 

Companies, Inc., GCC Enterprises, Inc., and Washington International Insurance Company 

recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Southern Mechanical Plumbing, Inc.

Judgment entered this 9th day of October, 2015.
-----Original Message-----

From: Ralph Timberlake [mailto:ralphtimberlake@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 2:18 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: I support the DOL retirement advice rule [RIN 1210-AB32]

Millions of Americans like me are counting on our 401(k)s and retirement accounts. I work hard to save 

for retirement.

Retirement plans involve complex financial decisions, so like many others, I rely on investment 

professionals for guidance. We should be able to trust our financial advisers to put our interests first. 

But loopholes in the current rules make it easy for some advisers to take advantage of hard-working 

Americans and line their own pockets with our retirement savings. This is not right. 

I appreciate and support the Dept. of Labor in its "fiduciary interest" rule making and hope this letter 

helps convince you that Americans care about their retirement savings. Just like the self-interested 

advice they give, retirement advisers are fighting the rule to protect the money they make off 

investments that earn them more money, even if they aren’t as good for my bottom line.

The unscrupulous zealots officials of the United States Postal Service are endangering my my life and 

welfare by ceasing home and property mail delivery service to 2117 Atkins Drive, Huntsville, Alabama 

35810 of mail addressed to Disabled Veteran Ralph Timberlake. Disabled Veteran Timberlake is 

encumbered in communicating with the outside world, Disabled Veteran Timberlake is hampered in 

receiving his annuity checks, Disabled Veteran Timberlake's Department of Veteran Affairs' medical 

appointments are interdicted, and Disabled Veteran Timberlake's Department of Veteran Affairs' mailed 

medications are embargoed. Disabled Veteran Timberlake is the victim of United States Postal Service's 

tyrannize evil actions while denying due process of law.

Ralph Timberlake

2117 Atkins Drive

Huntsville, AL 35810

256-851-7462
§ 227.15 Information collection. ( a ) The information collection requirements of this part were reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*) and are assigned OMB control number 2130-NEW.
( b ) The information collection requirements are found in the following sections: §§ 227.13, 227.103, 227.107, 227.109, 227.111, 227.117, 227.119, 227.121, 227.201, 227.203, 227.205, 227.207, 227.209, 227.211, 227.213, and 227.215.
[71 FR 63123, Oct. 27, 2006, as amended at 89 FR 5132, Jan. 26, 2024]
#### § 236.768 Locking, time.

A method of locking, either mechanical or electrical, which, after a signal has been caused to display an aspect to proceed, prevents, until after the expiration of a predetermined time interval after such signal has been caused to display its most restrictive aspect, the operation of any interlocked or electrically locked switch, movable-point frog, or derail in the route governed by that signal, and which prevents an aspect to proceed from being displayed for any conflicting route.
#### John H. Brooks, *Respondent, v.*John Baldwin, *Appellant*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
§ 214.117 Eye and face protection. ( a ) Railroad bridge workers shall be provided and shall wear eye and face protection equipment when potential eye or face injury may result from physical, chemical, or radiant agents.
( b ) Eye and face protection equipment required by this section shall conform to the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.133(b), as established by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
( c ) Face and eye protection equipment required by this section shall be kept clean and in good repair. Use of equipment with structural or optical defects is prohibited.
( d ) Railroad bridge workers whose vision requires the use of corrective lenses, when required by this section to wear eye protection, shall be protected by goggles or spectacles of one of the following types: ( i ) Spectacles whose protective lenses provide optical correction the, frame of which includes shielding against objects reaching the wearer's eyes around the lenses;
( ii ) Goggles that can be worn over corrective lenses without disturbing the adjustment of the lenses; or
( iii ) Goggles that incorporate corrective lenses mounted behind the protective lenses.
[67 FR 1908, Jan. 15, 2002; 67 FR 11055, Mar. 12, 2002, as amended at 74 FR 25172, May 27, 2009; 81 FR 37885, June 10, 2016]