alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HENRY COUNTY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David H. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Charles W. Blair, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David H. GillDavid H. Gill, President and CEO
(Principal Executive Officer)




/s/ Charles W. Blair, Jr.Charles W. Blair, Jr. EVP and CFO
(Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer)


May 14, 2010
#### § 236.378 Time locking.

Time locking shall be tested when placed in service and thereafter when modified, disarranged, or at least once every two years, whichever shall occur first.

[49 FR 3385, Jan. 26, 1984]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Sterling Gas Drilling Fund 1982 third quarter 1997 10 Q and it is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              11
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    11
<PP&E>                                      12,436,894
<DEPRECIATION>                             (11,701,148)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 735,757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          332,445
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     403,312<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   735,757
<SALES>                                        270,097<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               270,097
<CGS>                                          248,216
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  248,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,881
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.99<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Other se includes total partners' equity.
<F2>Sales includes $1,300 gain on sale of equipment.
<F3>The limited partners income was divided by the total number of limited
partnership units of 14,370.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 242.11 Penalties and consequences for noncompliance. ( a ) A person who violates any requirement of this part or causes the violation of any such requirement is subject to a civil penalty of at least $1,086 and not more than $35,516 per violation, except that: Penalties may be assessed against individuals only for willful violations, and, where a grossly negligent violation or a pattern of repeated violations has created an imminent hazard of death or injury to persons, or has caused death or injury, a penalty not to exceed $142,063 per violation may be assessed. Each day a violation continues shall constitute a separate offense. *See* FRA's website at *www.fra.dot.gov* for a statement of agency civil penalty policy.
( b ) A person who violates any requirement of this part or causes the violation of any such requirement may be subject to disqualification from all safety-sensitive service in accordance with part 209 of this chapter.
( c ) A person who knowingly and willfully falsifies a record or report required by this part may be subject to criminal penalties under 49 U.S.C. 21311.
( d ) In addition to the enforcement methods referred to in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section, FRA may also address violations of this part by use of the emergency order, compliance order, and/or injunctive provisions of the Federal rail safety laws.
[76 FR 69841, Nov. 9, 2011, as amended at 77 FR 24423, Apr. 24, 2012; 81 FR 43113, July 1, 2016; 82 FR 16135, Apr. 3, 2017; 83 FR 60750, Nov. 27, 2018; 84 FR 23737, May 23, 2019; 84 FR 37075, July 31, 2019; 86 FR 1760, Jan. 11, 2021; 86 FR 23256, May 3, 2021; 87 FR 15870, Mar. 21, 2022; 88 FR 1129, Jan. 6, 2023; 88 FR 89564, Dec. 28, 2023]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, September 18, 1995 (116), Para 116.31 Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1373]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.116.31  public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 5 of rule X and clause 4 of rule XXII, public bills and 
resolutions were introduced and severally referred as follows:

           By Mr. BURTON of Indiana:
       H.R. 2347. A bill to seek international sanctions against 
     the Castro government in Cuba, to plan for support of a 
     transition government leading to a democratically elected 
     government in Cuba, and for other purposes; to the Committee 
     on International Relations, and in addition to the Committees 
     on Ways and Means, Banking and Financial Services, the 
     Judiciary, and Rules, for a period to be subsequently 
     determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of 
     such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
     committee concerned.
           By Mr. GILMAN:
       H.R. 2348. A bill to authorize the transfer of naval 
     vessels to certain foreign countries; to the Committee on 
     International Relations.
           By Mr. SHUSTER (for himself, Mr. Petri, Mr. Mineta, Mr. 
             Rahall, and Mr. Oberstar):
       H.R. 2349. A bill to amend title 23, United States Code, to 
     designate the National Highway System, and for other 
     purposes; to the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure.
           By Mr. COBURN:
       H.R. 2350. A bill to amend title XVIII of the Social 
     Security Act to provide protections for Medicare 
     beneficiaries who enroll in Medicare managed care plans; to 
     the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the 
     Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
     determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of 
     such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
     committee concerned.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: maxine.daniel@gmail.com [mailto:maxine.daniel@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 2:35 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Maxine Daniel 

18690 Walnut Rd 

Castro Valley, CA 94546
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CFO CERTIFICATION**
I, Derek J. Kerr, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of America WestHoldings Corporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b)  [intentionally omitted]  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: April 26, 2005 /s/ Derek J. Kerr  Derek J. Kerr Chief Financial Officer
53
Exhibit 35.1


COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


OF


OHIO EDISON COMPANY, AS SERVICER


The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the duly elected and acting Vice President and Treasurer of Ohio Edison Company, as servicer (the “ Servicer ”) under the Phase-In-Recovery Property Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2013 (the “ Servicing Agreement ”), between the Servicer and OE Funding LLC, as Bond Issuer, and further certifies on behalf of the Servicer that:


|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement during the period that commenced June 20, 2013 and ended December 31, 2013 has been made under the supervision of the undersigned pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Servicing Agreement; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | To the undersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Servicing Agreement throughout the period that commenced June 20, 2013 and ended December 31, 2013.

Executed as of this 31 st day of March 2014.





OHIO EDISON COMPANYBy:/s/ Steven R. StaubName:Steven R. StaubTitle:Vice President and Treasurer
§ 242.205 Identification of certified persons and recordkeeping. ( a ) After September 1, 2012, a railroad shall maintain a list identifying each person designated as a certified conductor. That list shall indicate the types of service the railroad determines each person is authorized to perform and date of the railroad's certification decision.
( b ) If a railroad employs conductors working in joint operations territory, the list shall include person(s) determined by that railroad to be certified as conductor(s) and possessing the necessary territorial qualifications for the applicable territory in accordance with § 242.301.
( c ) The list required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section shall: ( 1 ) Be updated at least annually;
( 2 ) Be available at the divisional or regional headquarters of the railroad; and
( 3 ) Be available for inspection or copying by FRA during regular business hours.
( d ) It shall be unlawful for any railroad to knowingly or any individual to willfully: ( 1 ) Make, cause to be made, or participate in the making of a false entry on the list required by this section; or
( 2 ) Otherwise falsify such list through material misstatement, omission, or mutilation.
( e ) Nothing in this section precludes a railroad from maintaining the list required this section in an electronic format provided that: ( 1 ) The railroad maintains an information technology security program adequate to ensure the integrity of the electronic data storage system, including the prevention of unauthorized access to the program logic or the list;
( 2 ) The program and data storage system must be protected by a security system that utilizes an employee identification number and password, or a comparable method, to establish appropriate levels of program access meeting all of the following standards: ( i ) No two individuals have the same electronic identity; and
( ii ) An entry on the list cannot be deleted or altered by any individual after the entry is certified by the employee who created the entry;
( 3 ) Any amendment to the list is either: ( i ) Electronically stored apart from the entry on the list that it amends; or
( ii ) Electronically attached to the entry on the list as information without changing the original entry;
( 4 ) Each amendment to the list uniquely identifies the person making the amendment;
( 5 ) The system employed by the railroad for data storage permits reasonable access and retrieval of the information in usable format when requested to furnish data by FRA representatives; and
( 6 ) Information retrieved from the system can be easily produced in a printed format which can be readily provided to FRA representatives in a timely manner and authenticated by a designated representative of the railroad as a true and accurate copy of the railroad's records if requested to do so by FRA representatives.
[76 FR 69841, Nov. 9, 2011, as amended at 77 FR 6491, Feb. 8, 2012]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7373

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

LESTER FLETCHER, a/k/a Big Mann,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District 

Judge. (8:05-cr-00179-PJM-1)

Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 24, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lester Fletcher, Appellant Pro Se. David Ira Salem, Gina Simms, 

Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lester Fletcher seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Fletcher has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Fletcher’s 

motion for government funds to hire a private investigator, deny 

a certificate of appealability, and dismiss Fletcher’s appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 237.105 Special inspections. ( a ) Each bridge management program shall prescribe a procedure for protection of train operations and for inspection of any bridge that might have been damaged by a natural or accidental event, including but not limited to a flood, fire, earthquake, derailment or vehicular or vessel impact.
( b ) Each bridge management program shall provide for the detection of scour or deterioration of bridge components that are submerged, or that are subject to water flow.
Rule 13a-14(a) [Section 302] Certification

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
David V. Smith, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Chiron Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     [This
section intentionally omitted];

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



|DATE: December 16, 2004 |  |                                                                            |  | 
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                        |  | /s/DAVID V. SMITHDavid V. Smith
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 18



                                                               December 31, 1996


Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc.
1 East Pratt Street - 8E
Baltimore, MD 21202

We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 
10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have read management's justification for the change in accounting from the
"amortization" revenue recognition method to the "point of publication" method
contained in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.
Based on our reading of the data and discussions with Company officials of the
business judgment and business planning factors relating to the change, we
believe management's justification is reasonable.  Accordingly,  we concur that
the newly adopted accounting principle described above is preferable in the
Company's circumstances to the method previously applied.



/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
#### In the Matter of the Application of the Cortland and Homer Horse Railroad Company, Respondents, to acquire a crossing over the tracks of the Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Railroad Company and another, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Follett, J., not 1 sitting.
[Crim. No. 1769.

Third Dist.

June 24, 1941.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. JOHN A. GORDON, Appellant.

John A. Gordon, *in pro. per.,*for Appellant.

Earl Warren, Attorney General, and J. O. Brown, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

The appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of Shasta County of the crime of forgery, a felony.

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court May 28, 1941. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument *804on June 24, 1941. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing.

Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment is affirmed.