alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 229.303 Applicability. ( a ) The requirements of this subpart apply to all safety-critical electronic locomotive control systems, subsystems, and components (i.e., “products” as defined in § 229.305), except for the following: ( 1 ) Products that are fully developed prior to June 8, 2012.
( 2 ) Products that are under development as of October 9, 2012, and are fully developed prior to October 9, 2017.
( 3 ) Products that comingle locomotive control systems with safety critical processor based signal and train control systems;
( 4 ) Products that are used during on-track testing within a test facility; and
( 5 ) Products that are used during on-track testing outside a test facility, if approved by FRA. To obtain FRA approval of on-track testing outside of a test facility, a railroad shall submit a request to FRA that provides: ( i ) Adequate information regarding the function and history of the product that it intends to use;
( ii ) The proposed tests;
( iii ) The date, time and location of the tests; and
( iv ) The potential safety consequences that will result from operating the product for purposes of testing.
( b ) Railroads and vendors shall identify all products identified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section to FRA by February 9, 2013.
( c ) The exceptions provided in paragraph (a) of this section do not apply to products or product changes that result in degradation of safety, or a material increase in safety-critical functionality.
[77 FR 21348, Apr. 9, 2012, as amended at 77 FR 75057, Dec. 19, 2012]
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/5/15 10:44 AM

Received: June 25, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jmo-unjd

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0340

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Joe Recer

Address: 

10700 W. Research Drive, Suite 190

Milwaukee, WI, 53226

Email: joe.recer@voyafa.com

Phone: 4142562157

General Comment

Due to the millions of accounts involved a phased in approach is required. Accounts should be 

grand-fathered until there is contact between advisor and client with a five-year phase in.

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b569d3&format=xml&showo... 7/5/2015
#### In the Matter of the Application of Harry J. Griffin, as Superintendent of Highways of the Town of Bombay, Respondent, for an Order Compelling Calvin O. Harvey, Appellant, to Turn Over to Him the Books and Papers of That Office.

*Matter of Griffin,*145 App. Div. —, affirmed.

(Argued June 1, 1911;

decided June 16, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 22, 1911, which affirmed an order of the county judge of Franklin county committing the appellant herein to the county jail until he deliver certain books and papers to the petitioner, under section 80 of the Public Officers Law.

*John P. Kellas*and *Le Roy M. Kellas*for appellant.

*George J. Moore*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ.
Exhibit 34.3





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To  the Board of Directors and Shareholder of The Toledo Edison Company:





We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying  “Report on assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Asset-Backed Securities”, that The Toledo Edison Company complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the asset-backed securities transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving phase-in recovery property (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,  excluding (i) the criteria which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by them with respect to the Platform and (ii) the servicing activities that are applicable to the Platform but are excluded from the scope of management’s assertion and are not reported herein, as indicated in Exhibit 33.3 of Management’s Assertion on Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.  Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.











/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





Cleveland, Ohio


March 31, 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                       1,324,361
<SECURITIES>                                 1,589,644
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,261,995
<ALLOWANCES>                                    46,700
<INVENTORY>                                  1,799,969
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,028,650
<PP&E>                                       4,706,923
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,078,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,143,009
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,160,311
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    375,000
<COMMON>                                       144,362
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,243,836
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,143,009
<SALES>                                      1,934,129
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,934,129
<CGS>                                        1,195,375
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,195,375
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,658,610
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,948,056)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,948,056)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,948,056)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.67)
        

</TABLE>
Sanitized Version

of the

NMR
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

PRICEPLAY.COM, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

AOL ADVERTISING, INC., FACEBOOK INC., 

GOOGLE INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________ 

2015-1492, 2015-1589, 2015-1660

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in No. 1:14-cv-00092-RGA, Judge 

Richard G. Andrews, United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in Nos. 3:14-cv-04830-SI, 

3:14-cv-04828-SI, Judge Susan Y. Illston. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

SCOTT DANIELS, Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also 

represented by DARRIN A. AUITO. 

DARYL JOSEFFER, King & Spalding LLP, Washington, 

DC, argued for appellees. Appellee Google Inc., also 
 

represented by PAUL ALESSIO MEZZINA; ADAM CONRAD, 

Charlotte, NC. Appellee AOL Advertising, Inc., also 

represented by GEORGE FRANK PAPPAS, PETER ANDREW 

SWANSON, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC. 

Appellee Facebook Inc., also represented by HEIDI LYN 

KEEFE, MARK R. WEINSTEIN, LAM K. NGUYEN, Cooley LLP, 

Palo Alto, CA; MICHAEL GRAHAM RHODES, San Francisco, 

CA.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, BRYSON, and WALLACH, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 January 7, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
-----Original Message----- 

From: hhughes720@aol.com [mailto:hhughes720@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 5:44 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 01, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Helen Hughes 

23705 S. Rosecrest Fr. 

Sun Lakes, AZ 85248
Edward L. 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 19, 2014

No. 04-14-00483-CV

Rowland MARTIN, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

Edward L. BRAVENEC and 1216 West Ave., Inc.,

Appellees

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-07644

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Contempt and Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of December, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
-----Original Message----- 

From: anne@seaspec.com [mailto:anne@seaspec.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:53 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Anne Depue 

308 34th Ave 

Seattle, WA 98122
§ 28.160 Communications. ( a ) The Department shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The Department shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford an individual with handicaps an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the Department. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the Department shall give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with handicaps.
( ii ) The Department need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature to applicants or participants in programs.
( 2 ) Where the Department communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunications devices for deaf persons (TDDs) or equally effective telecommunication systems, shall be used to communicate with persons with impaired hearing.
( b ) The Department shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The Department shall provide signs at each primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information as to the location of accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the Department to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where personnel of a DOT element believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in an undue financial and administrative burden, the DOT element has the burden of proving that compliance with § 28.160 would result in such alteration or burden. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burden must be made by the Secretary or his or her designee, after considering all resources available for use in the funding and operation of the program or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the Department shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such a burden but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with handicaps receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2159

To provide for the transfer of certain lands on the Island of Vieques, Puerto

Rico, to the Municipality of Vieques.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 1995

Mr. ROMERO-BARCELO ́ (for himself, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. MILLER of California, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. UNDERWOOD, Mr. PASTOR, Mr. SERRANO,

Mr. GUTIERREZ, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, and Mr. FRAZER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on National Security,

and in addition to the Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To provide for the transfer of certain lands on the Island

of Vieques, Puerto Rico, to the Municipality of Vieques.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vieques Lands Trans5 fer Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 2159 IH

1 SEC. 2. LAND CONVEYANCE, VIEQUES ISLAND, PUERTO

2 RICO.

3 (a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of

4 Defense shall convey, without consideration, to the Mu5 nicipality of Vieques (in this section referred to as the

6 ‘‘Municipality’’) all right, title, and interest of the United

7 States in and to a parcel of real property, including any

8 improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 8000

9 acres under the jurisdiction of the Secretary located in the

10 western region of the Island of Vieques, Puerto Rico, as

11 generally depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Land Use Map,

12 Vieques Island (Restrictive Use Areas)’’ and dated Feb13 ruary 1, 1994.

14 (b) CONDITION OF CONVEYANCE.—The conveyance

15 required under subsection (a) shall be subject to the condi16 tion that the Municipality use the conveyed property for

17 public purposes consistent with the land use plan prepared

18 under subsection (c).

19 (c) LAND USE PLAN.—In connection with the condi20 tion specified in subsection (b), the Secretary shall require

21 the Municipality to submit to the Secretary a detailed plan

22 of the public purposes for which the conveyed property

23 may be used (such as housing, schools, hospitals, libraries,

24 child care centers, parks and recreation, agriculture, con25 servation, economic development, public health, and public

26 safety). The Secretary may not convey the property until
3

•HR 2159 IH

1 after the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date

2 the Secretary submits the plan to the Committee on Na3 tional Security and the Committee on Resources of the

4 House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed

5 Services and the Committee on Energy and Natural Re6 sources of the Senate.

7 (d) EFFECT ON ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS.—Nothing

8 in this section shall be construed to affect the application

9 of Federal and Commonwealth of Puerto Rico environ10 mental laws and regulations to the real property to be con11 veyed under this section, both before and after the convey12 ance.

Æ
----

| EXHIBIT      21.1 Subsidiaries of the    Registrant                                               |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                   | State      in WhichIncorporated  |
|  Vermont      Electric Power Company, Inc. (b)                                               | Vermont  |
|  Vermont      Transco LLC (b)                                                                |  Vermont |
|  Vermont      Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation                                               |  Vermont |
|  C.V.      Realty, Inc. (a)                                                                  |  Vermont |
|  Central      Vermont Public Service Corporation - East      Barnet Hydroelectric, Inc. (a)  |  Vermont |
|  Custom      Investment Corporation (a)                                                      |  Vermont |
|  Catamount      Resources Corporation (a)                                                    |  Vermont |
|    Eversant      Corporation (a) (c)                                                    | Vermont  |
|                                                                                                        |
|                                                                                                   | (a) Included      in consolidated financial statements (b) Separate      financial statements will be filed under Regulation S-X 3-09, which sets      forth the requirement for filing separate financial statements of      subsidiaries not           consolidated.  The investments in Vermont Electric Power Company      Inc. and Vermont Transco LLC meet certain 'significance' tests pursuant to      Rule 3-09 of SEC            Regulation S-X in 2008. (c) Eversant      Corporation has one wholly owned subsidiary operating in the United      States. |

----
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1924

To designate a site for the interim storage of spent nuclear fuel.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 22, 1995

Mrs. VUCANOVICH (for herself and Mr. ENSIGN) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To designate a site for the interim storage of spent nuclear

fuel.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Interim Waste Act’’.

5 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.

6 The Congress finds that—

7 (1) electric utilities are running out of space for

8 the storage of spent nuclear fuel at commercial reac9 tors;

10 (2) pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act

11 of 1982 and the contracts executed thereunder, the
2

•HR 1924 IH

1 Secretary has a clear and unconditional obligation to

2 accept spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive

3 waste beginning not later than January 31, 1998,

4 which obligation is continued under this Act;

5 (3) a repository for the permanent storage of

6 spent nuclear fuel will not be licensed until the early

7 part of the next century at the very earliest;

8 (4) for reasons of both safety and economics,

9 we must consolidate the current spent nuclear fuel

10 storage sites at 1 or 2 interim sites;

11 (5) several criteria should be met for an interim

12 spent nuclear fuel storage facility: spent nuclear fuel

13 should already be at the site, there should be an

14 adequate land area, the Federal Government should

15 already own the land, there should be a transpor16 tation infrastructure already in place, there should

17 be a security infrastructure already in place, a

18 skilled workforce familiar with handling nuclear ma19 terials should be available, a nuclear safety/worker

20 protection infrastructure should be in place, and the

21 locations should be in general proximity to the Na22 tion’s nuclear reactors, that is, one for the East and

23 one for the West;
3

•HR 1924 IH

1 (6) the new economic activity associated with

2 spent fuel management may address concurrent job

3 losses; and

4 (7) the Hanford Nuclear site and the Savannah

5 River Nuclear site meet all the criteria in paragraph

6 (5).

7 SEC. 3. OBLIGATIONS OF THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY.

8 The Secretary of Energy shall accept spent nuclear

9 fuel and high-level radioactive waste beginning not later

10 than January 31, 1998.

11 SEC. 4. INTERIM STORAGE.

12 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary shall design,

13 construct, and operate facilities for the interim storage of

14 spent nuclear fuel. The interim storage facilities shall be

15 licensed by the Commission and shall commence operation

16 by January 31, 1998.

17 (b) LOCATION.—The interim storage facilities shall

18 be located at the Savannah River Nuclear site and the

19 Hanford Nuclear site.

Æ