alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
August 29, 2013 **U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

# Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities Committee (FRRCC) **TELECONFERENCE AGENDA**

**August 8, 2013 1:00 pm EST** 

**– 3:00pm EST**  **The call -**  **in number is 1 -**  **866 -**  **299 -**  **3188, and the**  **access code is 5644700# 1:00**  **- 1:15pm**  **Welcome and introductions**  Roll Call of FACA members on the phone  Introduction of EPA Regional Ag Advisors  Introduction of Program Office agriculture related staff **1:15 -**  **1:45pm EPA follow up on C**  **ommittee recommendations from the 2011 Report**   Any nutrient criteria proposed by EPA should be science based with a clear cause - effect relationship  EPA guidelines on preparation of economi c anal ysis should be followed  EPA should have a coordinated public engagement plan  Each region should have a designated agricultural liaison  EPA should work proactively with agriculture and should support certainty programs  EPA should leverage all available resources including state federal conservation programs, 319 funding, USDA programs, State Revolving Loan funds, private foundations, etc .  EPA should enable and provide resources for a multi entity, multi - disciplinary approach to quantifying the water quality benef its from agricultural practices **1:45 -**  **2:00pm Committee input on potential future briefings**  **to the FACA 2:00**  **- 2:40pm**  **EPA presentation on a series of issues that the FACA may be interested in delving into**  **and for which we need your help** 2:00 - 2:10 NAEMS Study next steps 2:10 - 2:20 OW animal ag strategy work group 2:20 - 2:30 E -NPDES presentation 2:30 - 2:40 Nitrogen and Co -pollutant Research Roadmap **2:40 -**  **2:45pm How to work better moving forward**  **2:45 -**  **2:50pm Future meeting dates**  **2:50 -** **3:00pm Public Comments**  **3:00pm Adjourn**
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 20, 1995 (98), Para 98.34 Memorials]
[Page 1169]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.98.34  memorials

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, memorials were presented and referred as 
follows:

       138. By the SPEAKER: Memorial of the House of 
     Representatives of the State of Alabama, relative to 
     expressing opposition to the Congress of the United States 
     with respect to pending bills to reduce benefits for coal 
     miners; to the Committee on Economic and Educational 
     Opportunities.
       139. By the SPEAKER: Also, memorial of the Senate of the 
     State of Nevada, relative to urging the Congress of the 
     United States to amend the Social Security Act and the 
     Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow States to make 
     payments for certain services provided to, and to provide 
     certain services to, recipients of Medicaid who have 
     disabilities; jointly, to the Committees on Ways and Means 
     and Commerce.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: nanamary205@yahoo.com [mailto:nanamary205@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 11:39 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 30, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Mary Watts 

601 e 19th Apt C-1 

Lamar, MO 64759
-----Original Message----- 

From: hal_d28@hotmail.com [mailto:hal_d28@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:02 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Hal Dalrymple, Ph.D. 

2300 Woodbridge Dr. 

Las Vegas, NV 89108
#### In the Matter of Charles F. Hunter.

— Order vacated and argument ordered.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50233

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RIGOBERTO RIVERA-CASTRO, a/k/a Rigoberto Castro-Garcia, 

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:01-CR-1380-ALL

 

October 8, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Rivera-Castro appeals his sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United

States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Rivera argues that the

district court erred in sentencing him based on § 1326(b)(2), which

provides that an illegal alien who was removed from this country

subsequent to a conviction for an aggravated felony shall be

sentenced to not more than twenty years, because his prior
1 523 U.S. 224 (1998).

2 526 U.S. 227 (1999).

3 530 U.S. 466 (2000).

4 See, e.g., United States v. Rayo-Valdez, – F.3d –, 2002 WL

1832140 (5th Cir. Aug. 12, 2002) (“We must follow [AlmendarezTorres], which has not been overruled by the only court with the

power to do so, the Supreme Court.”); United States v. RodriguezMontelongo, 263 F.3d 429, 434 (5th Cir. 2001) (“Although

[Appellant] is correct that Apprendi cast doubt on the continued

validity of Almendarez-Torres, it did not overrule that

decision.... It is for this court to apply the law as it exists and

for the Supreme Court to overrule its precedent if it so

chooses.”). 

2

conviction was neither charged in his indictment nor presented to

the jury to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Although he

concedes that Almendarez-Torres v. United States1 held that a prior

aggravated felony is a sentencing factor, not an element of the

crime, he urges that Jones v. United States2 and Apprendi v. New

Jersey3 overruled Almendarez-Torres. However, we have noted on

numerous occasions that the Supreme Court has not overruled

Almendarez-Torres, and that therefore we are still bound to apply

it.4

Appellant’s sentence is therefore AFFIRMED.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2427

To amend the Public Health Service Act with respect to the participation

of the public in governmental decisions regarding the location of group

homes established pursuant to the program of block grants for the

prevention and treatment of substance abuse.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 1995

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act with respect to

the participation of the public in governmental decisions

regarding the location of group homes established pursuant to the program of block grants for the prevention

and treatment of substance abuse.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Substance Abuse

5 Group Homes Amendments of 1995’’.
2

•HR 2427 IH

1 SEC. 2. PARTICIPATION OF PUBLIC IN GOVERNMENTAL DE2 CISIONS REGARDING LOCATION OF CERTAIN

3 GROUP HOMES.

4 Section 1925 of the Public Health Service Act (42

5 U.S.C. 300x–25) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing subsection:

7 ‘‘(d) LOCATION OF HOMES; MONITORING.—A fund8 ing agreement for a grant under section 1921 is that the

9 State involved, in providing for the establishment and op10 eration of housing pursuant to the revolving fund under

11 subsection (a), will ensure that the State or local officials

12 involved comply with the following:

13 ‘‘(1) In developing and administering govern14 mental policies for the location of such housing (re15 ferred to in this subsection as ‘designated group

16 homes’), the officials provide the public with oppor17 tunities to consult with the officials on proposed and

18 existing policies.

19 ‘‘(2) Before making a decision to permit the es20 tablishment of a designated group home in a com21 munity:

22 ‘‘(A) The officials notify members of the

23 community that the community is under consid24 eration as a proposed site for such a home.
3

•HR 2427 IH

1 ‘‘(B) The officials provide to the members

2 an opportunity to consult with the officials on

3 the proposal.

4 ‘‘(3) After the establishment of a designated

5 group home in a community:

6 ‘‘(A) The officials monitor the group home

7 in order to determine whether the residents of

8 the home are in compliance with the conditions

9 upon which the permission to establish the

10 home was granted.

11 ‘‘(B) The officials provide to the members

12 of the community, including the residents of the

13 group home, opportunities to consult with the

14 officials on the effects of the group home on the

15 community.’’.

Æ
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Champion Industries, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending October 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Marshall T. Reynolds, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of and for the periods presented.



| | /s/ Marshall T. Reynolds
Marshall T. Reynolds, Chief Executive Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 17, 2003

13
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF PAULSON CAPITAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY AS OF
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS,
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS IN THE PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             106
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,495
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                              1,882
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                             18,934
<PP&E>                                             697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,384
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                       6,562
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                 122
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,057
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,384
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                1,868
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                                64
<COMMISSIONS>                                   12,745
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                    2,492
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<COMPENSATION>                                  14,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,390
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      10,390
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,240
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.78


</TABLE>
#### § 22.43 Approval or denial.

If a loan guarantee is approved by DOT OSDBU, a Guarantee Agreement, form DOT F 2314-1, will be issued to the Participating Lender. If a loan guarantee is declined by the Participating Lender, the Participating Lender is responsible for communicating the reasons for the decline to the applicant. The Participating Lender must notify the applicant, in writing, of the reasons for the decline; and a copy of this notification must be sent to DOT OSDBU. If a loan guarantee is declined by the DOT OSDBU, DOT OSDBU will be responsible for communicating the reasons for the decline to the applicant. The form is available at *http://www.osdbu.dot.gov/financial/docs/Loan_Guarantee_DOT_F_2314-1.pdf.*
Amendment to Petition ID: FAA-2015-2388-0001

I, Matthew Roderick wish to amend my petition to 

include an additional UAS (unmanned aerial system). 

Due to the superior range, endurance and safety

features, I wish to add a DJI Phantom 3 Professional 

to my petition. I’ve attached the manufacture’s 

operating manual which details the specifications and 

operating limits of the UA (unmanned aircraft). The 

capabilities and specifications vary only slightly from 

the DJI Phantom 2 Vision +, originally listed in my

petition. Other operators using the DJI Phantom 3 

Professional have been granted exemptions. Please 

see exemption numbers 12442 and 12436.

The manufacture’s operating manual lists the 

maximum operating altitude as 6000 Meters. In 

keeping with the limits set forth by the administrator, 

neither UA listed in this petition will be operated at 

more that 400 feet AGL. 

I appreciate your further consideration on this matter 

and I’ve included my contact information below if 

there are any further concerns. 

Respectfully,

Matthew Roderick

208.866-6598

matt@airequipco.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
EnergyNorth, Inc. condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1998
and condensed consolidated statement of income and statement of cash flows for
the three months ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      104,201<F1>
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     12,594<F2>
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          32,096
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        11,029
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   2,225
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 162,145
<COMMON>                                         3,320
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       32,506
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             17,235
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  53,061
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            44,156
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              10,212
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    2,031
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  52,685
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  162,145
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       31,471
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             1,884
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      25,361
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      27,245
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          4,226
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 374
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   4,600
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,381
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,219
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    3,219
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         1,112
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,569<F3>
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         (2,532)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Net of accumulated depreciation of $52,759
<F2>Net of accumulated depreciation of $10,713
<F3>$3,569 represents the forecasted annual interest on bonds for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 1999.  Actual interest on bonds for the three months
ended December 31, 1998 was $902.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

Reply to Attn of: DK 18 November 2015

Dr. Paul Lawson

SPEC Inc.

3022 Sterling Circle – Ste 200

Boulder, CO 80301

Dear Paul,

I understand you are requesting a Stage 3 Noise Restrictions waiver from the FAA so 

your company can maintain its Learjet model 25 research aircraft in the Restricted 

Category. Based on your communication with me, the other options are to install hush 

kits or place the Lear in the Experimental category, but these are not practical courses of 

action due to operational limitations and insurance liability. 

The purpose of this letter is to emphasize the importance of contributions the SPEC 

Learjet has made to NASA field campaigns. An example is the “Studies of Emissions 

and Atmospheric Composition, Clouds and Climate Coupling by Regional Surveys”

(SEAC4RS) field campaign conducted in 2013. The SEAC4RS field campaign involved 

over 100 scientists from 23 research institutions, the NASA ER-2 (U-2) and DC-8 

research aircraft, and the SPEC Learjet. 

(see https://espo.nasa.gov/missions/seac4rs/mission-gallery/subject/aircraft ) 

The SPEC Lear has been operating in its research mode for the past 17 years and makes 

vital contributions to our understanding of weather and climate change. During 

SEAC4RS the Lear performed the critical task of collecting data in rapidly developing 

convective clouds, a flight profile that requires the performance and structural integrity of 

an aircraft like the Learjet. As you are aware, it is very challenging to fund the 

development and certification of a new research aircraft. Therefore it is extremely 

unlikely that the SPEC Learjet could be replaced if it were lost to the scientific 

community. 

Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

Sincerely,

Hal Maring, Ph.D.

Program Manager

NASA Radiation Sciences Program

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration
§ 199.109 Review of drug testing results. ( a ) *MRO appointment.* Each operator shall designate or appoint a medical review officer (MRO). If an operator does not have a qualified individual on staff to serve as MRO, the operator may contract for the provision of MRO services as part of its anti-drug program.
( b ) *MRO qualifications.* Each MRO must be a licensed physician who has the qualifications required by DOT Procedures.
( c ) *MRO duties.* The MRO must perform functions for the operator as required by DOT Procedures.
( d ) *MRO reports.* The MRO must report all drug test results to the operator in accordance with DOT Procedures.
( e ) Evaluation and rehabilitation may be provided by the operator, by a substance abuse professional under contract with the operator, or by a substance abuse professional not affiliated with the operator. The choice of substance abuse professional and assignment of costs shall be made in accordance with the operator/employee agreements and operator/employee policies.
( f ) The operator shall ensure that a substance abuse professional, who determines that a covered employee requires assistance in resolving problems with drug abuse, does not refer the covered employee to the substance abuse professional's private practice or to a person or organization from which the substance abuse professional receives remuneration or in which the substance abuse professional has a financial interest. This paragraph does not prohibit a substance abuse professional from referring a covered employee for assistance provided through: ( 1 ) A public agency, such as a State, county, or municipality;
( 2 ) The operator or a person under contract to provide treatment for drug problems on behalf of the operator;
( 3 ) The sole source of therapeutically appropriate treatment under the employee's health insurance program; or
( 4 ) The sole source of therapeutically appropriate treatment reasonably accessible to the employee.
[53 FR 47096, Nov. 21, 1988, as amended by Amdt. 199-2, 54 FR 51850, Dec. 18, 1989; Amdt. 199-15, 63 FR 13000, Mar. 17, 1998; Amdt. 199-15, 63 FR 36863, July 8, 1998. Redesignated and amended by Amdt. 199-19, 66 FR 47118, Sept. 11, 2001]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paulson Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chester L. F. Paulson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Chester L. F. Paulson            
|Chester L. F. Paulson                
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|Paulson Capital Corp.                
|                                     
|November 13, 2009                    

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any
other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Paulson Capital Corp. and will be retained by Paulson Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.