alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 187/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 187 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6427 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 187

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6427 May 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Amendments to the International Convention on the Harmonisation of Frontier Controls of Goods (Harmonisation Convention, 1982) –
  According to UN Depositary Notification C.N.83.2021.TREATIES-XI.A.17 the following amendments to the Harmonisation Convention enter into force on 27 May 2021 for all Contracting Parties | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/846 of 25 May 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 concerning emergency measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2021) 3844)

   (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Amendments to the International Convention on the Harmonisation of Frontier Controls of Goods (Harmonisation Convention, 1982) –
  According to UN Depositary Notification C.N.83.2021.TREATIES-XI.A.17 the following amendments to the Harmonisation Convention enter into force on 27 May 2021 for all Contracting Parties

According to UN Depositary Notification C.N.83.2021.TREATIES-XI.A.17 the following amendments to the Harmonisation Convention enter into force on 27 May 2021 for all Contracting Parties

1

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/846 of 25 May 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 concerning emergency measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2021) 3844)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2021) 3844)

1

2

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### J. H. ALLEN & COMPANY, Appellant, v. C. E. STYER, Catherine Styer, Mary F. Regan and Ida E. Gallock, Respondents.

(199 N. W. 447.)

Opinion filed June 12, 1924.

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Dakota, *Lowe,*J.

Affirmed.

*P. M. Clark,*and *McGee & Goss,*for appellant.

*Eldon O. Hanson,*and *G. 8. Wooledge,*for respondents.

Per Curiam.

The facts and issues in this case being identical with those in the companion case of Finch, Van Slyke & McConville v. *158Styer, ante, 148, 199 N. W. 444, this case is controlled by that decision. The judgment is affirmed.

Bronson, Oh. J., and Birdzell, Nuessle, Christianson, and Johnson, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 17

- 00752

- CV

Erlinda RODRIGUEZ

, Appellant

v.

Johnny NEWMAN

, Appellee

From the 83rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 33215

Honorable Robert Cadena, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is REINSTATED on the

docket of this court. This cause is REVERSED AND REMANDED to the trial court for further

pr oceedings. Costs of this appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them.

SIGNED March 28, 2018.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice
From: Gwendolyn Gehl LCSW,LLC,CTS,DCSW [mailto:gwendolyngehl@netwurx.net] 

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:38 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Regarding Regulatory Guidance USCG-2007-27022

I am a Licensed Clinical Social Worker who provides neurofeedback treatment to individuals with 

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Mood Disorders. Neurofeedback is an empirically validated 

and widely recognized effective non-medication treatment for ADHD, as well as other conditions. 

There are over 50 studies evaluating the effectiveness of neurofeedback in the treatment of ADHD, 

substance use disorders and Autism. A recent review of this literature concluded "Neurofeedback meets 

the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry criteria for Clinical Guidelines for treatment 

of ADHD." This means that neurofeedback meets the same criteria as medication for treating ADHD, of 

which 60% of prescriptions are in fact prescribed "off label," and that neurofeedback "should always be 

considered as an intervention for this disorder by the clinician." 

 

This service has been denied by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, United Behavioral Health, Blue Cross, Cigna, 

and Amerigroup. 

 

This is limitation of an effective and validated treatment for a mental health problem. The reasons 

given by the insurance companies for this denial fell into two categories: 1) our company does not 

cover biofeedback for mental health problems or 2) there is not yet sufficient evidence for the efficacy 

of neurofeedback. As such, they are using evidence-based criteria that are far more restrictive for 

mental health services than the criteria which are used for medical/surgical services. There are many 

routine medical and surgical procedures which have far fewer controlled studies about their efficacy 

than does neurofeedback. These medical and surgical procedures are generally not limited because of 

concerns about how many controlled studies have been performed about them. 

 I believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity statute should require that 

employers and plans pay for the same range and scope of services for behavioral treatments as they do 

for medical surgical benefits and that a plan cannot be more restrictive in their managed care criteria 

and reviews for mental health and substance abuse disorders when compared to medical surgery. 

Today plans are being more restrictive in how they review evidenced-based mental health 

and Substance Abuse Treatments when compared to medical surgical treatments. This violates both the 

intent and letter of the parity statute and it is my hope that the regulations will clarify that this can't 

continue. 

Thank you in advance for your consideration of this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Gwendolyn Gehl, LCSW,LLC 

\Willow Creek 

N2735 Fox Road 

Neosho, WI 53059 

920-625-3070 

www.gwendolyngehl.com
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.475 Internal corrosion control: General. ( a ) Corrosive gas may not be transported by pipeline, unless the corrosive effect of the gas on the pipeline has been investigated and steps have been taken to minimize internal corrosion.
( b ) Whenever any pipe is removed from a pipeline for any reason, the internal surface must be inspected for evidence of corrosion. If internal corrosion is found— ( 1 ) The adjacent pipe must be investigated to determine the extent of internal corrosion;
( 2 ) Replacement must be made to the extent required by the applicable paragraphs of §§ 192.485, 192.487, or 192.489; and
( 3 ) Steps must be taken to minimize the internal corrosion.
( c ) Gas containing more than 0.25 grain of hydrogen sulfide per 100 cubic feet (5.8 milligrams/m.3) at standard conditions (4 parts per million) may not be stored in pipe-type or bottle-type holders.
[Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12302, June 30, 1971, as amended by Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR 39390, Sept. 5, 1978; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28785, June 6, 1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37504, July 13, 1998]
Exhibit 4.2


 




	
  NUMBER

  	
   

  	
  SHARES

  
	
  ASF 17

  	
   

  	
   

  






 


ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.




	
  INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA

  	
   

  	
  CUSIP 048877 10 4

  
	
  COMMON STOCK

  	
   

  	
  SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

  






 


THIS CERTIFIED that


 


 


is the owner of


 


FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE
COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $5,00 PER SHARE OF


 


ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.


 


transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof
in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.
This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and
registered by the Registrar.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to
be signed by the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers and its
Corporate seal to be hereunto affixed.


 


DATED:


 


 


	
  

  	
  

  
	
  PRESIDENT & CEO

  	
  SR. VICE PRESIDENT &
  CFO

  



 


 


	
  COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED

  
	
   

  	
  REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER COMPANY

  
	
   

  	
  TRANSFER AGENT AND
  REGISTRAR

  
	
   

  
	
  BY

  
	
   

  
	
   

  	
  AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2415 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2415

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the United States Customs Administrative Building at the 
 Ysleta/Zaragosa Port of Entry located at 797 South Zaragosa Road in El 
   Paso, Texas, as the ``Timothy C. McCaghren Customs Administrative 
                               Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Customs Administrative Building at the Ysleta/
Zaragosa Port of Entry located at 797 South Zaragosa Road in El Paso, 
Texas, shall be known and designated as the ``Timothy C. McCaghren 
Customs Administrative Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Timothy C. McCaghren Customs 
Administrative Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 31, 1995 (137), Para 137.8 Legislative Branch Appropriations, FY 1996]
[Page 1805]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.137.8  legislative branch appropriations, fy 1996

  Mr. PACKARD, pursuant to House Resolution 239, called up the bill 
(H.R. 2492) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes.
  When said bill was considered.
  After debate,
  The previous question having been ordered by said resolution.
  The bill was ordered to be engrossed and read a third time, was read a 
third time by title.
  The question being put,
  Will the House pass said bill?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, announced that 
pursuant to clause 7 of rule XV the yeas and nays were ordered, and the 
call was taken by electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

315

affirmative

Nays

106
```
Editorial Note on Part 193
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

§ 193.2005 Applicability. ( a ) Regulations in this part governing siting, design, installation, or construction of LNG facilities (including material incorporated by reference in these regulations) do not apply to LNG facilities in existence or under construction when the regulations go into effect.
( b ) If an existing LNG facility (or facility under construction before March 31, 2000 is replaced, relocated or significantly altered after March 31, 2000, the facility must comply with the applicable requirements of this part governing, siting, design, installation, and construction, except that: ( 1 ) The siting requirements apply only to LNG storage tanks that are significantly altered by increasing the original storage capacity or relocated, and
( 2 ) To the extent compliance with the design, installation, and construction requirements would make the replaced, relocated, or altered facility incompatible with the other facilities or would otherwise be impractical, the replaced, relocated, or significantly altered facility may be designed, installed, or constructed in accordance with the original specifications for the facility, or in another manner subject to the approval of the Administrator.
[Amdt. 193-17, 65 FR 10958, Mar. 1, 2000, as amended by Amdt. 193-18, 69 FR 11336, Mar. 10, 2004]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Omega
Financial Corporation's third quarter 1996 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety
to such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000705671
<NAME> OMEGA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          37,929
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             528
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,950
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    128,106
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         115,420
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           114,774
<LOANS>                                        704,774
<ALLOWANCE>                                     11,851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,014,456
<DEPOSITS>                                     858,364
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,960
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             11,095
<LONG-TERM>                                      9,605
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        745
<COMMON>                                       130,687
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,014,456
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 47,170
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,456
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   848
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                57,474
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              22,467
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,791
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           34,683
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      754
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 561
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 23,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,017
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,884
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.86
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.87
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,846
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,644
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    14
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                11,668
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      866
<RECOVERIES>                                       295
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               11,851
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            11,851
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
From: William Wasserman [mailto:wkwesq@comcast.net] 

Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 3:01 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comments Regarding Regulatory Guidance USCG-2007-27022 page 19157, II B specific 

areas 1 and 4

I am a Nurse Practitioner who provides neurofeedback treatment to individuals with 

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Mood Disorders. Neurofeedback is an 

empirically validated and widely recognized effective non-medication treatment for 

ADHD, as well as other conditions. There are over 50 studies evaluating the 

effectiveness of neurofeedback in the treatment of ADHD, substance use disorders and 

Autism. A recent review of this literature concluded "Neurofeedback meets the 

American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry criteria for Clinical Guidelines 

for treatment of ADHD." This means that neurofeedback meets the same criteria as 

medication for treating ADHD, of which 60% of prescriptions are in fact prescribed "off 

label," and that neurofeedback "should always be considered as an intervention for 

this disorder by the clinician." 

 

This service has been denied by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, United Behavioral Health, 

Blue Cross, Cigna, and Amerigroup. 

 

This is limitation of an effective and validated treatment for a mental health problem. 

The reasons given by the insurance companies for this denial fell into two categories: 

1) our company does not cover biofeedback for mental health problems or 2) there is 

not yet sufficient evidence for the efficacy of neurofeedback. As such, they are using 

evidence-based criteria that are far more restrictive for mental health services than 

the criteria which are used for medical/surgical services. There are many routine 

medical and surgical procedures which have far fewer controlled studies about their 

efficacy than does neurofeedback. These medical and surgical procedures are 

generally not limited because of concerns about how many controlled studies have 

been performed about them. 

 We believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity statute 

should require that employers and plans pay for the same range and scope of 

services for behavioral treatments as they do for medical surgical benefits and that a 

plan cannot be more restrictive in their managed care criteria and reviews for mental 

health and substance abuse disorders when compared to medical surgery. Today plans 

are being more restrictive in how they review evidenced-based mental health 

and Substance Abuse Treatments when compared to medical surgical treatments. This 

violates both the intent and letter of the parity statute and we hope that the 

regulations will clarify that this can't continue.

Victoria Wasserman, CRNA, APRN
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 21, 1995 (119), Para 119.15 Providing for a Closed Conference--H.R. 1530]
[Page 1447]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.119.15  providing for a closed conference--h.r. 1530

  Mr. SPENCE moved, pursuant to clause 6(a) of rule XXVIII, that the 
conference committee meetings between the House and the Senate on the 
bill (H.R. 1530) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1996 for 
military activities of the Department of Defense, to prescribe military 
personnel strengths for fiscal year 1996, and for other purposes; be 
closed to the public at such times as classified national security 
information is under consideration; Provided, however, that any sitting 
Member of Congress shall have a right to attend any closed or open 
meeting.
  The question being put,
  Will the House agree to said motion?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LINDER, announced that a roll call was 
required under clause 6(a), rule XXVIII, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

414

affirmative

Nays

1
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: clcortiz@prodigy.net [mailto:clcortiz@prodigy.net] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 6:06 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

C Ortiz 

491 Hamilton Pl 

Hackensack, NJ 07601
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2464

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 15, 1996

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

AN ACT

To amend Public Law 103–93 to provide additional lands

within the State of Utah for the Goshute Indian Reservation, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2464 RFS

1 SECTION 1. ADDITION OF CERTAIN UTAH STATE LANDS TO

2 GOSHUTE INDIAN RESERVATION.

3 The Utah Schools and Lands Improvement Act of

4 1993 (107 Stat. 995) is amended—

5 (1) by redesignating section 11 as section 12;

6 and

7 (2) by inserting after section 10 the following

8 new section:

9 ‘‘SEC. 11. ADDITIONAL GOSHUTE INDIAN RESERVATION

10 LANDS.

11 ‘‘(a) FURTHER ADDITIONS TO GOSHUTE RESERVA12 TION.—In addition to the lands described in section 3, for

13 the purpose of securing in trust for the Goshute Indian

14 Tribe certain additional public lands and lands belonging

15 to the State of Utah, which comprise approximately 8,000

16 acres of surface and subsurface estate, as generally de17 picted on the map entitled ‘Additional Utah-Goshute Ex18 change’, dated July 1, 1994, such public lands and State

19 lands are hereby declared to be part of the Goshute Indian

20 Reservation in the State of Utah effective upon the com21 pletion of conveyance of the State lands from the State

22 of Utah and acceptance of title by the United States.

23 ‘‘(b) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the Interior

24 is authorized to acquire through exchange those lands and

25 interests in land described in subsection (a) which are
3

HR 2464 RFS

1 owned by the State of Utah, subject to valid existing

2 rights.

3 ‘‘(c) APPLICATION OF PRIOR PROVISIONS.—(1) Ex4 cept as provided in paragraph (2), the remaining provi5 sions of this Act which are applicable to the lands to be

6 transferred to the Goshute Indian Tribe pursuant to sec7 tion 3 shall also apply to the lands subject to this section.

8 ‘‘(2) The Goshute Indian Tribe will be responsible for

9 payment of the costs of appraisal of the lands to be ac10 quired pursuant to this section, which costs shall be paid

11 prior to the transfer of such lands.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
#### § 236.742 Dog, locking.

A steel block attached to a locking bar or tappet of an interlocking machine, by means of which locking between levers is accomplished.