alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Paulson Capital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Carol A. Rice, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Carol A.  Rice           |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Carol A.  Rice               |
| Chief  Financial Officer     |
| Principal  Financial Officer |
| May 12, 2003                 |

 

----
-----Original Message----- 

From: rice1place2b4us@smnet.net [mailto:rice1place2b4us@smnet.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 5:55 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

karen rice 

39 Walnut Hill Dr 

Franklin, NC 28734
-----Original Message----- 

From: guyparalegal@sbcglobal.net [mailto:guyparalegal@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 1:47 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Guy Johnson 

1770 W. Balboa Blvd #2D 

Newport Beach, CA 92663
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 25, 1995 (73), Para 73.14 Calendar Wednesday Business Dispensed With]
[Page 818]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.73.14  calendar wednesday business dispensed with

  On motion of Mr. ARMEY, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That business in order for consideration on Wednesday, June 
7, 1995, under clause 7, rule XXIV, the Calendar Wednesday rule, be 
dispensed with.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         646,369
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,695,444
<ALLOWANCES>                                   251,041
<INVENTORY>                                    531,221
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,032,100
<PP&E>                                      28,260,600
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,345,477
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             133,961,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,500,495
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       171,341
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,690,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,361,955
<SALES>                                     11,239,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,307,977
<CGS>                                        3,730,826
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,389,931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,046,176
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,574
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,686
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (176,390)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (176,390)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (176,390)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.06)


</TABLE>
# Wine Statistics

EmailGet Email Updates

TTB Form 5120.17Wine Mapping Translation

filing period

Wine page

## National Wine Statistics

Wine National Report Excel Wine Yearly Data CSV Wine Monthly Data CSV Wine Data JSON

2012 - 2024 Updated 8/27/2024 Data current through June 2024

## Wine Annual State Statistics

2012-2023 Updated 3/15/2024Data current through December 2023

## Wine Statistical Mapping Translation

#### CONTACT US

For more information on statistical data, contact the TTB National Revenue Center online or toll-free at **877-882-3277** / 877-TTB-FAQS. You may also visit our NRC Contacts page for more information.

Please direct correspondence to:

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade BureauNational Revenue CenterOperations Services550 Main Street, Room 8970Cincinnati, OH 45202-3222

                          Last reviewed: November 8, 2016                                       Last updated: August 27, 2024                                       Maintained by: about-ttb/who-we-are/offices/national-revenue-center>National Revenue Center
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RAUL ROMERO MATOS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 119 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of October , 2018, the Motion for Leave to File Amicus

Curiae Brief is GRANTED, and the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, treated as a Petition

for Review, is DENIED.
Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post

- consumer fiber and process chlorine free.

Customer Service Hotline: 1

- 800

- 438

- 2474 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

- 2029

February 27, 2014

Mr. David K. Paylor, Director

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

P.O. Box 1105

Rich mond, Virginia 23218

Dear Mr. Paylor :

On February 18, 2014 , the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a

revision to the Commonwealth of Virginia S tate I mplementation P lan (SIP) from the

Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Environmenta l Quality. This SIP revision consists of

a F ederally enforceable state operating permit containing terms and conditions for the control of

emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the Mondel ē z Global LLC, Inc.

Richmond Bakery located in Henrico County. This revision pertains to the 1997 8

- hour ozone

national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) reasonably available control technology (RACT)

for sources not subject to control technology guideline s (CTG) for the Richmond Ozone

maintenance area. The EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically

complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR).

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Irene Shandruk

, Office of Air Program Planning , at (215) 814

- 2 166

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Diana Esher , Director

A ir Protection Division

cc: Tom Ballou, Director

Office of Dat a Analysis and Planning
§ 240.201 Implementation. ( a ) Each railroad shall designate in writing any person(s) it deems qualified as a designated supervisor of locomotive engineers. Each person so designated shall have demonstrated to the railroad through training, testing or prior experience that he or she has the knowledge, skills, and ability to be a designated supervisor of locomotive engineers.
( b ) Each railroad shall designate in writing all persons that it will deem to be qualified as certified locomotive engineers for the purpose of initial compliance with paragraph (d) of this section, except as provided for in paragraph (h) of this section. ( 1 ) Each person so designated shall have demonstrated to the railroad through training, testing or prior experience that he or she has the knowledge and skills to be a certified locomotive engineer.
( 2 ) Each railroad shall issue a certificate that complies with § 240.223 to each person that it designates as qualified under the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section.
( c ) No railroad shall permit or require a person, designated as qualified for certification under the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section, to perform service as a certified locomotive or train service engineer for more than a 36-month period unless that person has been determined to be qualified in accordance with procedures that comply with subpart C.
( d ) No railroad shall permit or require any person to operate a locomotive in any class of locomotive or train service unless that person has been certified as a qualified locomotive engineer and issued a certificate that complies with § 240.223.
( e ) No Class I railroad (including the National Railroad Passenger Corporation) or railroad providing commuter service shall designate any person it deems qualified as a designated supervisor of locomotive engineers or initially certify or recertify a person as a locomotive engineer in either locomotive or train service unless that person has been tested, evaluated, and determined to be qualified in accordance with procedures that comply with subpart C.
( f ) No Class II railroad shall designate any person it deems qualified as a designated supervisor of locomotive engineers or initially certify or recertify a person as a locomotive engineer in any class of locomotive or train service unless that person has been tested, evaluated and determined to be qualified in accordance with procedures that comply with subpart C.
( g ) No Class III railroad (including a switching and terminal or other railroad not otherwise classified) shall designate any person it deems qualified as a designated supervisor of locomotive engineers or initially certify or recertify a person as a locomotive engineer in any class of locomotive or train service unless that person has been tested, evaluated and determined to be qualified in accordance with procedures that comply with subpart C.
( h ) Each person designated as a locomotive engineer shall be issued a certificate that complies with § 240.223 prior to being required or permitted to operate a locomotive.
[74 FR 68183, Dec. 23, 2009]
Page I of 1 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

Docket: IRS-2009-0008 

Request for Information for Paul Wellstont: and Pete Dommici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: TRS-2009-0008-OOO! 

Roqucst for Information Kegarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity 

and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: lRS-2009-J)0!18-0~15 1. 

Comment cbn FR Doc # E9-09629 

Submitter Information 

Name: David Brian Rawlings 

Address: 

Naples, FL, 

Organization: David B. Rawlings, Ph.D., PA 

General Comment 

Biufcdhack is a useful and efficacious, non-medication, ancillary treatment Sir 

many physical and mcntal disordeis. Ut>fortui~ately, the pharmaceutical and 

insurance companies do not want the pub1 ic to know this. Neumfeedback has 

also been proven to be extremely useful in treating ADHD. As you may know, 

AUHD creates considerable difficulties for the patient as well as thcix significant 

others and taxcs the medical and educational systems.
§ 238.225 Electrical system. All passenger equipment shall comply with the following: ( a ) *Conductors.* Conductor sizes shall be selected on the basis of current-carrying capacity, mechanical strength, temperature, flexibility requirements, and maximum allowable voltage drop. Current-carrying capacity shall be derated for grouping and for operating temperature.
( b ) *Main battery system.* ( 1 ) The main battery compartment shall be isolated from the cab and passenger seating areas by a non-combustible barrier.
( 2 ) Battery chargers shall be designed to protect against overcharging.
( 3 ) If batteries are of the type to potentially vent explosive gases, the battery compartment shall be adequately ventilated to prevent the accumulation of explosive concentrations of these gases.
( c ) *Power dissipation resistors.* ( 1 ) Power dissipating resistors shall be adequately ventilated to prevent overheating under worst-case operating conditions as determined by the railroad.
( 2 ) Power dissipation grids shall be designed and installed with sufficient isolation to prevent combustion.
( 3 ) Resistor elements shall be electrically insulated from resistor frames, and the frames shall be electrically insulated from the supports that hold them.
( d ) *Electromagnetic interference and compatibility.* ( 1 ) The operating railroad shall ensure electromagnetic compatibility of the safety-critical equipment systems with their environment. Electromagnetic compatibility may be achieved through equipment design or changes to the operating environment.
( 2 ) The electronic equipment shall not produce electrical noise that affects the safe performance of train line control and communications or wayside signaling systems.
( 3 ) To contain electromagnetic interference emissions, suppression of transients shall be at the source wherever possible.
( 4 ) All electronic equipment shall be self-protected from damage or improper operation, or both, due to high voltage transients and long-term over-voltage or under-voltage conditions. This includes protection from both power frequency and harmonic effects as well as protection from radio frequency signals into the microwave frequency range.
#### In Matter of Application of American Surety Company.

Order granted.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 144 (Friday, July 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 41338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3667]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel, Review of SBIR/STTIR 
Applications; RFA AA-07-009/10.
    Date: August 13, 2007.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Philippe Marmillot, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on 
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 5635 Fishers Lane, RM 3045, Bethesda, 
MD 20892, 301-443-2861, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1d707c6f7074717172696d5d707c747133737475337a726b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fc919d8e9195909093888cbc919d9590d2929594d29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 20, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-3667 Filed 7-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 861 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.861

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
          the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

                                 An Act

 
  To make technical amendments to section 10 of title 9, United States 
                                  Code.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VACATION OF AWARDS.

    Section 10 of title 9, United States Code, is amended--
        (1) by indenting the margin of paragraphs (1) through (4) of 
    subsection (a) 2 ems;
        (2) by striking ``Where'' in such paragraphs and inserting 
    ``where'';
        (3) by striking the period at the end of paragraphs (1), (2), 
    and (3) of subsection (a) and inserting a semicolon and by adding 
    ``or'' at the end of paragraph (3);
        (4) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
        (5) in paragraph (5), by striking ``Where an award'' and 
    inserting ``If an award'', by inserting a comma after ``expired'', 
    and by redesignating the paragraph as subsection (b).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7347

RONNIE MCCRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GARY MAYNARD, Director of SCDC; CHARLIE CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-02-838) Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: December 9, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ronnie McCray seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a state court unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). As to claims dismissed by a district court solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F. 3d 676, 684 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court and the magistrate judge that McCray has not satisfied either standard. SeeMcCray v. Maynard , No. CA-02-838 (D.S.C. Aug. 20, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the3 appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 242.501 Review board established. ( a ) Any person who has been denied certification, denied recertification, or has had his or her certification revoked and believes that a railroad incorrectly determined that he or she failed to meet the certification requirements of this regulation when making the decision to deny or revoke certification, may petition the Federal Railroad Administrator to review the railroad's decision.
( b ) The Administrator has delegated initial responsibility for adjudicating such disputes to the Operating Crew Review Board.
( c ) The Operating Crew Review Board shall be composed of employees of the Federal Railroad Administration selected by the Administrator.