alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 13

- 00249

- CV

MILTON L

. GARDNER , Appellant

v.

KIMBERLY REINDOLLAR , Appellee

From the 77th District Court Limestone County, Texas Trial Court No. 30,200

- A

ORDER

Appellee, Kimberly Reindollar , filed a motion to dismiss this appeal primarily
due to the failure of appellant, Milton Gardner, to abide by the briefing rules of the
Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See, e.g. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.1. Reindollar’s motion is

denied.

Reindollar should file a brief in response to Gardner’s brief that evidences her

best effort to address the merits of Gardner’s issues. This does not mean, however, that
Reindollar is prevented from asserting as a ground for overruling an issue that the issueGardner v. Reindollar Page 2

may be inade quately briefed. Nevertheless, even if Reindollar asserts an issue is
inadequately briefed, she should still address the merits of the issue if at all possible.
In addition to responding to the merits of any of Reindo llar’s arguments in her

brief, to the extent any argument is made in Reindollar’s brief that an issue is
inadequately briefed, Gardner will have 30 days to respond by supplementing his brief,
if he believes he should, to address Reindollar’s arguments.
Reindollar’s brief remains due by Janua ry 30, 201 4

.

PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motion denied Order issued and filed January 16, 2014
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 1, 2017

s0125

Order 

Clerk

February 1, 2017

153324

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153324

COA: 321487

Wayne CC: 10-006891-FC

RODERICK LOUIS PIPPEN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 14, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). 

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order 

addressing whether the defendant was denied the effective assistance of counsel based on 

trial counsel’s failure to adequately investigate and present testimony from a res gestae 

witness. See, e.g., Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668, 689; 104 S Ct 2052; 80 L Ed 

2d 674 (1984); Towns v Smith, 395 F3d 251 (CA 6, 2005). The parties should not submit 

mere restatements of their application papers.
#### Frederick Reck v. Phœnix Insurance Company.

Motion denied.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 158 (Thursday, August 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 46093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4015]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; ``Foxp3 complex''.
    Date: September 13, 2007.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sujata Vijh, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-0985, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d7b6467657e4d63646c646923636465236a627b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9fe9f6f5f7ecdff1f6fef6fbb1f1f6f7b1f8f0e9">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 9, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-4015 Filed 8-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, *Plaintiffs,*v. Knickerbooker Life Insurance Company, *Defendant.*

— Order reversed, without costs.
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*The Twenty-third Street Railway Company *v.*The Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments.

— Order affirmed.
§ 232.605 Training requirements. ( a ) *Inspection, testing and maintenance.* A railroad that operates a freight car or freight train equipped with an ECP brake system and each contractor that performs inspection, testing, or maintenance on a freight car or freight train equipped with an ECP brake system shall adopt and comply with a training, qualification, and designation program for its employees that perform inspection, testing or maintenance of ECP brake systems. The training program required by this section shall meet the requirements in §§ 232.203(a), (b), (e), and (f).
( b ) *Operating rules.* A railroad operating a freight train or freight car equipped with an ECP brake system shall amend its operating rules to govern safe train handling procedures related to ECP brake systems and equipment under all operating conditions and shall tailor its operating rules to the specific equipment and territory of the railroad.
( c ) *Locomotive engineers.* A railroad operating a freight car or freight train equipped with an ECP brake system shall adopt and use in its training program under part 240 specific knowledge, skill, and ability criteria to ensure that its locomotive engineers are fully trained with the operating rules governing safe train handling procedures related to ECP brake systems and equipment under all operating conditions and tailored to the specific equipment and territory of the railroad.
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36984-36985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13554]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Release Airport Property at St. Petersburg-
Clearwater International (PIE), St. Petersburg, FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA hereby provides notice of intent to release certain 
airport properties of approximately 16.88 acres at St. Petersburg-
Clearwater International (PIE), St. Petersburg, FL from the conditions, 
reservations, and restrictions as contained in a Quitclaim Deed 
agreement between the FAA and the Pinellas County, dated 11 March 1941. 
The release of property will allow Pinellas County to dispose of the 
property for Florida Department of Transportation roadway right of way 
project.

DATES: Comments are due on or before July 8, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review at St. Petersburg-
Clearwater International Airport (PIE), and the FAA

[[Page 36985]]

Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 400, 
Orlando, FL 32822. Written comments on the Sponsor's request must be 
delivered or mailed to: Jenny Iglesias-Hamann, Community Planner, 
Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 
400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jenny Iglesias-Hamann, Community 
Planner, Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National 
Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21) requires the 
FAA to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment prior to 
the ``waiver'' or ``modification'' of a sponsor's Federal obligation to 
use certain airport land for non-aeronautical purposes.
    The property is located Multiple parcels along Roosevelt Road (SR 
686) adjacent to airport. The parcels are currently designated 
Aeronautical and Non-Aeronautical. The property will be released of its 
federal obligations in support of the Florida Department of 
Transportation (FDOT) Gateway Express Project. The fair market value of 
thess parcels has been determined to be $12,205,865.
    Documents reflecting the Sponsor's request are available, by 
appointment only, for inspection at the St. Petersburg-Clearwater 
International Airport (PIE) and the FAA Airports District Office.

Bart Vernace,
Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2016-13554 Filed 6-7-16; 8:45 a.m.]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
```

[112th Congress Public Law 257]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 2413]]

Public Law 112-257
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to eliminate certain limitations 
on the length of Secret Service Protection for former Presidents and for 
   the children of former Presidents. <<NOTE: Jan. 10, 2013 -  [H.R. 
                                6620]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Former 
Presidents Protection Act of 2012.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 18 USC 1 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Former Presidents Protection Act of 
2012''.
SEC. 2. ELIMINATING CERTAIN LIMITATIONS ON THE LENGTH OF SECRET 
                    SERVICE PROTECTION FOR FORMER PRESIDENTS AND 
                    FOR THE CHILDREN OF FORMER PRESIDENTS.

    (a) Former Presidents.--Section 3056(a)(3) of title 18, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``unless the former President did 
not'' and all that follows through ``warrant such protection''.
    (b) Children of Former Presidents.--Section 3056(a)(4) of title 18, 
United States Code, is amended by striking ``for a period'' and all that 
follows through ``comes first''.

    Approved January 10, 2013.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6620:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            Dec. 5, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 28, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### Doris Routt, appellee, v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, appellant.

Filed July 8, 1918.

No. 19503.

Opinion on motion for rehearing of case reported in 101 Neb. 763.

*Former judgment of affirmance vacated, and judgment of district court reversed, and action dismissed.*

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in *Kane v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen,*p. 645, *post,*the judgment of affirmance heretofore entered herein is set aside, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the action dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Hamer, J., dissents.
-----Original Message----- 

From: eyerule00@yahoo.com [mailto:eyerule00@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:44 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Yvette Richardson 

6605 Park Place Dr #C 

Richland Hills, TX 76118
§ 244.3 Preemptive effect. Under 49 U.S.C. 20106, issuance of these regulations preempts any State law, regulation, or order covering the same subject matter, except an additional or more stringent law, regulation, or order that: ( a ) Is necessary to eliminate or reduce an essentially local safety hazard;
( b ) Is not incompatible with a law, regulation, or order of the United States Government; and
( c ) Does not unreasonably burden interstate commerce.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SOMANETICS CORPORATION AS OF, AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED, AUGUST 31, 1996 AND IS QUAILIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         829,008
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  314,133
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    991,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,178,453
<PP&E>                                         811,677
<DEPRECIATION>                                 726,810
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,675,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          294,406
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,154
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,361,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,675,503
<SALES>                                        699,006
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               699,006
<CGS>                                          327,151
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  327,151
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,025,835
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,582,728)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,582,728)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,582,728)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.86)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2404 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2404

 To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act of 
          1994 until November 1, 1995, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 1995

  Mr. Gilman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act of 
          1994 until November 1, 1995, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 583(a) of the Foreign Relations 
Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103-236), as 
amended by Public Law 104-22, is amended by striking ``October 1, 
1995,'' and inserting ``November 1, 1995,''.
    (b) Consultation.--For purposes of any exercise of the authority 
provided in section 583(a) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, 
Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103-236) prior to October 5, 
1995, the written policy justification dated June 1, 1995, and 
submitted to the Congress in accordance with section 583(b)(1) of such 
Act, and the consultations associated with such policy justification, 
shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements of section 583(b)(1) of 
such Act.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.478 Internal corrosion control: Onshore transmission monitoring and mitigation. ( a ) Each operator of an onshore gas transmission pipeline with corrosive constituents in the gas being transported must develop and implement a monitoring and mitigation program to mitigate the corrosive effects, as necessary. Potentially corrosive constituents include, but are not limited to: carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, sulfur, microbes, and liquid water, either by itself or in combination. An operator must evaluate the partial pressure of each corrosive constituent, where applicable, by itself or in combination, to evaluate the effect of the corrosive constituents on the internal corrosion of the pipe and implement mitigation measures as necessary.
( b ) The monitoring and mitigation program described in paragraph (a) of this section must include: ( 1 ) The use of gas-quality monitoring methods at points where gas with potentially corrosive contaminants enters the pipeline to determine the gas stream constituents.
( 2 ) Technology to mitigate the potentially corrosive gas stream constituents. Such technologies may include product sampling, inhibitor injections, in-line cleaning pigging, separators, or other technology that mitigates potentially corrosive effects.
( 3 ) An evaluation at least once each calendar year, at intervals not to exceed 15 months, to ensure that potentially corrosive gas stream constituents are effectively monitored and mitigated.
( c ) An operator must review its monitoring and mitigation program at least once each calendar year, at intervals not to exceed 15 months, and based on the results of its monitoring and mitigation program, implement adjustments, as necessary.
[Amdt. 192-132, 87 FR 52270, Aug. 24, 2022]
#### § 218.80 Movement of occupied camp cars.

Occupied cars may not be humped or flat switched unless coupled to a locomotive.
-----Original Message----- 

From: jzollars@livingbank.org [mailto:jzollars@livingbank.org] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 4:31 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jan Zollars 

5550 N. Braeswood #149 

Houston, TX 77096
From: Pat Shediack 

Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2015 7:47 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210 - AB32

Regarding the proposed rule on “fiduciary” status of investment advisors for 

individuals, I say, “If you are a professional, you always put your client first.” If a 

professional cannot put the client first, then that individual has a clear ethical 

conflict of interest and should be barred for participating in any aspect of the 

individual’s investment. 

For those firms who have a problem with this approach, I say, “Buy errors and 

omissions insurance to cover flawed advice and develop new business models 

compliant with this proposed rule to grow your business.

It is not the individual’s responsibility to ensure the investment advisor puts the 

client first or the investment firm makes the desired margin of profit. Both those 

responsibilities are clearly on the investment advisor and investment firms.

Patrick D. Shediack, MSM, PMP

No virus found in this message.

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

Version: 2015.0.5941 / Virus Database: 4339/9696 - Release Date: 05/04/15
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 8:26 AM

To: 'plajjd@gmail.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Informat ion: Sarra Ventures (FAA-2015-1547)



### July 29, 2015

Dear Ms. Baurer:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-1547). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make, mode l, and type (i.e., fixed-wing, roto rcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. This information can be located in the aircraft manual.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by August
12, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov