alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Max & Ermas Restaurants,
Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably
 26




---



##### 



likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date:  June 20, 2008/s/ Robert A. LindemanRobert A. LindemanPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofMax & Ermas Restaurants, Inc.
 27
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.11  


 
 

PROMISSORY NOTE    
    



	U.S. $50,000.00	 	Denver, Colorado
	 	 	Date: March 14, 2006





        1.     FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned (Borrower) promise(s) to pay William W. Reid or order, (Note Holder) the principal sum of Fifty Thousand and no/100 U.S.
Dollars ($50,000.00). Principal shall be payable at 222 Milwaukee Street, Suite 301, Denver, Colorado 80206 or such other address as the Note Holder may designate, in one lump sum
payment of Fifty Thousand Dollars (U.S. $50,000.00), due on demand. This note shall be non-interest bearing. 


        2.     If
any payment required by this Note is not paid when due, the indebtedness shall bear interest at the rate of            percent per annum from the date of
default. The Note Holder shall be entitled to collect all reasonable costs and expense of collection and/or suit, including, but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees. 


        3.     Borrower
may prepay the principal amount outstanding under this Note, in whole or in part, at any time without penalty. 


        Any
partial prepayment shall be applied against the principal amount outstanding and shall not postpone the due date of any subsequent payments or change the amount of such payments. 


        4.     Borrower
and all other makers, sureties, guarantors, and endorsers hereby waive presentment, notice of dishonor and protest, and they hereby agree to any extensions of
time of payment and partial payments before, at, or after maturity. This Note shall be the joint and several obligation of Borrower and all other makers, sureties, guarantors and endorsers, and
their successors and assigns. 


        5.     Any
notice to Borrower provided for in this Note shall be in writing and shall be given and be effective upon (1) delivery to Borrower or (2) mailing
such notice by first-class U.S. mail, addressed to Borrower at the Borrower's address stated below, or to such other address as Borrower may designate by notice to the Note Holder. Any
notice to the Note Holder shall be in writing and shall be given and be effective upon (1) delivery to Note Holder or (2) by mailing such notice by first-class U.S.
mail, to the Note Holder at the address stated in the first paragraph of this Note, or to such other address as Note Holder may designate by notice to Borrower. 


        6.     This
Note evidences a business loan and not a consumer loan or consumer-related loan within the meaning of Colorado law. 



	

 	
 	

GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  DAVID C. REID      
 Its Vice President






(SEAL)






        Borrower's
address: 222 Milwaukee Street, Suite 301, Denver, CO 80206 











QuickLinks


PROMISSORY NOTE
#### § 29.531 Does FTCA cover employees of the Tribe who are paid by the Tribe from funds other than those provided through the compact and funding agreement?

Subject to FTCA limitations, the FTCA covers employees of the Tribe who are not paid from compact and funding agreement funds as long as the services out of which the claim arose were performed in carrying out a compact and funding agreement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERIM
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 2-4 OF
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 27, 1999.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1999
<CASH>                                       1,155,918
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,718,005
<ALLOWANCES>                                   460,653
<INVENTORY>                                    556,560
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,055,419
<PP&E>                                      34,618,455
<DEPRECIATION>                              24,373,390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,140,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,424,971
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       170,740
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,544,873
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,140,584
<SALES>                                     43,379,888
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,379,888
<CGS>                                       39,111,852
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               44,013,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               460,653
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             105,891
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (633,146)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (114,659)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (518,487)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (518,487)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.2


COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


OF


THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY, AS SERVICER


The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the duly elected and acting Vice President and Treasurer of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, as servicer (the “ Servicer ”) under the Phase-In-Recovery Property Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2013 (the “ Servicing Agreement ”), between the Servicer and CEI Funding LLC, as Bond Issuer, and further certifies on behalf of the Servicer that:


|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement during the period that commenced June 20, 2013 and ended December 31, 2013 has been made under the supervision of the undersigned pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Servicing Agreement; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | To the undersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Servicing Agreement throughout the period that commenced June 20, 2013 and ended December 31, 2013.

Executed as of this 31 st day of March 2014.





THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANYBy:/s/ Steven R. StaubName:Steven R. StaubTitle:Vice President and Treasurer
Presentation to the U.S. Environmental Prot

EP

W

Neeva-Gayle C

ACC Center for the Polyu
CPI 

CPI 

CPI promotes the sustainable g

of the polyurethane industr

by identifying and managing isby identifying and managing is

that could impact the indust

in cooperation with user grou
CPI B k 

CPI Backg

• Membership:

– CPI represents the nation CPI represents the nation s’ leading producers an

leading producers an

distributors of chemicals and equipment used to polyurethane and manufacture polyurethane pro

• Priorities:

– Health and Safety– E d Cli t Ch Energy and Climate Change

– Combustibility

– Sustainability

– Global Coordination
P t 

Par

t 

CPI is part of ACC, 

the largest trade association 

for the chemical industry for the chemical industry, 

and its Plastics Division, 

the lead organization for 

plastics resin producers. 
CPI M 

CPI

Mem
Th 

a

CPI welcomes the 

opportunity to partn

with EPA d 

ith EPA on produ

stewardship initiativ
#### § 236.794 Rod, up-and-down.

A rod used for connecting the semaphore arm to the operating mechanism of a signal.
§ 256.3 Definitions. As used in this part— ( a ) *Act* means the Department of Transportation Act, as amended.
( b ) *Administrator* means the Federal Railroad Administrator, or his delegate.
( c ) *Allowable project costs* means those project costs for which Federal financial assistance may be expended under § 256.7.
( d ) *Applicant* means a governmental entity, a non-profit public-purpose organization, or any responsible person having the legal, financial, and technical capacity to implement an intermodal passenger terminal project under this part. The applicant must have legal authority to receive and expend Federal funds.
( e ) *Chairman* means the Chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts.
( f ) *Civic and cultural activities* includes, but is not limited to, museums, libraries, musical and dramatic presentations, art exhibitions, adult education programs, public meetings of community groups, convention visitors and others, and other public activities supported in whole or in part under Federal law.
( g ) *Council* means the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
( h ) *Demonstration funds* means funds authorized for the purpose set forth in paragraph (1)(A) of subsection 4(i) of the Act.
( i ) *Intermodal passenger terminal* means an existing railroad passenger terminal which has been or may be modified as necessary to accommodate several modes of transportation, including intercity rail service and some or all of the following: Intercity bus, commuter rail, intra-city rail transit and bus transportation, airport limousine service and airline ticket offices, rent-a-car facilities, taxis, private parking, and other transportation services.
( j ) *National Register* means the National Register of Historic Places maintained by the Secretary of the Interior.
( k ) *Planning funds* means funds authorized for the purpose set forth in paragraph (1)(D) of subsection 4(i) of the Act.
( l ) *Preservation funds* means funds authorized for the purpose set forth in paragraph (1)(B) of subsection 4(i) of the Act.
( m ) *Project* means a locally sponsored, coordinated, and administered program, or any part thereof, to plan, finance, construct, maintain, or improve an intermodal passenger terminal, which may incorporate civic or cultural activities where feasible in an architecturally or historically distinctive railroad passenger terminal.
( n ) *4R Act* means the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, as amended, Public Law 94-210, 90 Stat. 125, 49 U.S.C. 1653.
( o ) *Sufficient commitments* means commitments of a binding nature adequate to ensure the successful operation of a project. Such commitments may be conditional, requiring, for example, the participation of other entities in the project, or action by a date certain.
[40 FR 29080, July 10, 1975, as amended at 43 FR 21887, May 22, 1978; 44 FR 21647, Apr. 11, 1979]
# PSP~ Focus on yourbusiness, not your IT

# ~

March 23, 2010 The Honorable Ray LaHood United States Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Reference: Docket DOT-OST-2010-001B Dear Secretary LaHood: 

### I--amwritffigteexpress-my-.strong-sllppert-f{}l'thefleW 

### daily**nonstop~rviee** from Seattle**tt'r""~-** --­ Tokyo Haneda International Airport proposed by Delta Air Lines. We provide internet services to over 35,000 Japanese corporations out from ourData Center in Seattle. Both our Japanese partner companies from Japan and we travel back and forth between Seattle and Tokyo for meetings. Seattle should be one ofthe four selected cities for the limited services, as the city has been an important and long-standing U.S. gateway for Japan with strong historical, cultural and business ties. Washington State is already the most trade-oriented state in the entire country, and a popular destination among the Japanese visitors with Ichiro playing for Mariners as well. Delta's new service to HanedawiJI enhance the business and the tourism in the region and create direct and immediate economic benefits. We realize that Haneda slot opportunity is limited. Our region's travelers look to the convenience offlying into Haneda airport not only for the convenience ofbeing right in Tokyo but also the convenience ofhaving choices to transit to otherregional airports in Japan. The Departmenthas the opportunity to ensure that Seattle continues to grow as an important international gateway and should approve the frequencies proposed by Deltato serve Haneda. We urge the Department ofTransportation to select the Seattle service for the benefit ofthe Seattle and Pacific Northwest Region.

# ~;mi::::===:::-

# __**~~amura** President & CEO Pacific Software Publishing, Inc.

1404-14Oth Place NE, Bellevue, WA 98007-3915 USA Phone: (425)957-0808 Fax: (425)957-1188 www.pspinc.com
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyf-zmuk

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2180

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jonathan Oaks

Address: 

490 Orange Ave

St. Cloud, FL, 34769

Email: joaks55@live.com

General Comment

Obama, who has proven exceptionally talented in making law without Congress, is proposing a 

new rule for the IRS that continues Obamas socialist quest to fundamentally transform what was 

once a great nation into yet another dark, corroding, second-rate, third world, socialist utopia.

What is this new overreach? A wider range of custodians of retirement accounts (such as 401(k) 

and the like) would be required to adhere to a larger fiduciary standard than what is currently 

done in the financial world, because, as the regulation itself states, seldom can Americans 

prudently manage retirement benefits on their own and that they generally cannot distinguish 

good investments from bad.

You know, us poor schlubs that carry the tax burden who dont know to look both ways before 

crossing the street. Obama to the rescue!

The "fiduciary standards" you claim to want to have adhered to by all investors or advisors 
ALREADY EXISTS AT THE STATE REGULATORY LEVEL. IT IS TOTALLY 

UNNECESSARY IN THE SELF-DIRECTED SELF-MANAGED IRA.

This new level of regulatory confiscatory control is not meant to prevent individual financial 

malfeasance, IT IS MEANT TO PROVIDE ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO COLLECT FEES 

AND TARIFFS THAT ARE TO BE "NEEDED" TO IMPLEMENT THESE NEW 

REGULATIONS AND THE STAFFING REQUIRED FOR THEIR ENFORCEMENT.

The DOLs enforcement track record is typical government bureaucracy run amok. Why are 

players like Jon Corzine free while Bernie Madoff is in prison and both are guilty of theft and or 

loss of BILLIONS of dollars? 

THE ONLY PURPOSE OF BUREAUCRACY IS TO PERPETUATE THE BUREAUCRACY!

The BILLIONS of dollars that will be removed from the economy by these new regulations will 

fulfill this purpose, BUT IT WILL DO NOTHING ELSE EXCEPT TAKE EVEN MORE CASH 

OUT OF MY POCKET WITH NOT BENEFIT!

This is yet another attempt to destroy our free capitalist market with more failed Keynesian 

policies. 

Enforce current regulations before further destroying what little is left of what once was a great 

economy prior to Lyndon Johnson (remember that fella?), Clinton, Franks, Todd, and Obama. 

One last thing: our economy today is due to the housing bubble THAT WAS CAUSED BY 

CLINTON, FRANKS, AND TODD, and their feel good, progressive liberal, destructive policies. 

STAY AWAY FROM MY RETIREMENT!
From: tuccid@gmail.com [mailto:tuccid@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:39 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Darrell Tucci 

1541 N Martel Ave Apt 108 

Los Angeles, CA 90046
PUBLIC LAW 109–64—SEPT. 20, 2005 119 STAT. 1997

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 804:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109–44 (Comm. on Financial Services).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

July 12, considered and passed House.

Sept. 8, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–64

109th Congress

An Act

To exclude from consideration as income certain payments under the national

flood insurance program.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PAYMENTS UNDER NATIONAL

FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.

Chapter I of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42

U.S.C. 4011 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following

new section:

‘‘TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PAYMENTS

‘‘SEC. 1324. Assistance provided under a program under this

title for flood mitigation activities (including any assistance provided

under the mitigation pilot program under section 1361A, any assistance provided under the mitigation assistance program under section 1366, and any funding provided under section 1323) with

respect to a property shall not be considered income or a resource

of the owner of the property when determining eligibility for or

benefit levels under any income assistance or resource-tested program that is funded in whole or in part by an agency of the

United States or by appropriated funds of the United States.’’.

Approved September 20, 2005.

42 USC 4031.

Sept. 20, 2005

[H.R. 804]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6690
RONALD FLOYD JACKSON, Movant - Appellant, and CHARLES LEE STUBBS, a/k/a T-Bone, Plaintiff, versus CHARLES E. FOLEY, Sheriff of Marlboro County, in his personal and individual capacity and individual capacity as P olicy Maker for the Marlboro County Sheriff's Department; DENNIS RUSTY PARRISH, Deputy Sheriff; CHARLES LEMMON,Deputy Sheriff; PEARLIE THOMAS, Deputy Sheriff; HENRY ABRAHAM, Deceased Deputy Sheriff; JERRY STARNES, Deputy Sheriff in their personal and individual capacities; TWO OR THREE UNNAMED STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENTS TO BE AMENDED, Defendants - Appellees, and COUNTY OF MARLBORO, in their personal and individual capacity as the Governing Entity and Policy Maker of Marlboro County, Defendant.2 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-859-3-20BC) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 1, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Floyd Jack son, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Thomas King, WILLCOX, MCLEOD, BUYCK, BAKER & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of the voluntary dismissal entered inthis case. Because he is neither the deceased party's personal representative or his attorney of record, Appellant lacks standing toprosecute this appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 43(a). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED3