alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This South Gifford Pinchot National Forest Resource Advisory Committee will meet on Thursday, September 6th at the Skamania County Courthouse Annex, 170 NW. Vancouver Ave., Stevenson, Washington. The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and continue until 5 p.m. The purpose of the meeting is to review ongoing Title II and III projects, elect a chair, set an indirect project percentages, and make recommendations on proposals for Title II funding of projects under the Secure Rural Schools and County Self-Determination Act of 2000.

All South Gifford Pinchot National Forest Resources Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend. The “open forum” provides opportunity for the public to bring issues, concerns, and discussion topics to the Advisory Committee. The “open forum” is scheduled to occur at 9:45 a.m. on September 6, 2007. Interested speakers will need to register prior to the open forum period. The committee welcomes the public's written comments on committee business at any time.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Direct questions regarding this meeting to Chris Strebig, Public Affairs Specialist, at (360) 891-5005, or write Forest Headquarters Office, Gifford Pinchot National Forest, 10600 NE. 51st Circle, Vancouver, WA 98682.

Dated: July 27, 2007

Lynn Burditt,

Deputy Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 07-3826  Filed 8-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 28, 2024

No. 04-24-00378-CV

Karen GAFFORD,

Appellant

v.

Elizabeth BLISS-GAFFORD,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2023-CI-12948

Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF JURISDICTION. We order appellant to pay the costs of this appeal.

It is so ORDERED on August 28, 2024.

_____________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of August, 2024.

_____________________________

Luz Estrada, Chief Deputy Clerk
#### Alexander McKinstry, Jr., *Respondent, v.*Guy Davis and others, *Appellants.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
#### § 198.59 How may a State respond to a notice of inadequacy?

A State receiving a notice of inadequacy will have 30 days from receipt of the notice to submit a written response to the PHMSA official who issued the notice. In its response, the State may include information and explanations concerning the alleged inadequacy or contest the allegation of inadequacy and request the notice be withdrawn.
-----Original Message----- 

From: sallycello@comline.com [mailto:sallycello@comline.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:54 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sally Rosoff 

588A Avenida Majorca 

Laguna Woods, CA 92637
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         168,834                 168,834
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  960,830                 960,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,218                  19,218
<INVENTORY>                                  1,508,363               1,508,363
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,987,309               2,987,309
<PP&E>                                       5,142,743               5,142,743
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,353,120               3,353,120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,144,059               5,144,059
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,647,636               1,647,636
<BONDS>                                      1,484,671               1,484,671
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       258,437                 258,437
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,637,447               1,637,447
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,144,059               5,144,059
<SALES>                                      1,109,405               3,280,579
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,750,305               5,135,354
<CGS>                                          721,727               1,911,769
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,894,992               5,541,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             114,939                 380,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (258,631)               (744,916)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (258,631)               (744,916)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (258,631)               (714,916)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.10)                  (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.10)                  (0.29)
        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Petition for Habeas Corpus of Nicholas Roach.

— Order reversed. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
DC Filing Services Canada Inc. 403-717-3898


March 17, 2006    




                                            




To: Bradley Rudman                              Facsimile # 516 408 4884

President, Director,

Golden Patriot, Corp.

3000 Marcus Ave.

Suite 3W4, New Hyde Park,

NY, 11042







Re: DDD and Extension of the “Handley” and “GPTC” Agreement on the Lucky Boy Uranium Property, Arizona, and Ashworth Explorations Ltd.




Dear Mr. Rudman,




This letter serves to extend the property payment of $25,000.00 USD ($10,000.00 paid), due and payable on March 17, 2006, pursuant to the agreement dated March 17, 2005 between Handley Minerals Inc. and Golden Patriot, Corp to April 17, 2006.




Also pursuant to this agreement and acknowledged by Golden Patriot, Corp is a deficit in exploration expenditures not meeting the $200,000.00 USD for the first year. This letter also serves to excuse Golden Patriot, Corp from this obligation but must make up the short-fall in 2nd year expenditure obligations. 




Also, this letter serves to acknowledge indebtedness to Ashworth Explorations Ltd. of approximately $47,300.00 CDN also due and payable by April 17, 2006.




Also, this letter acknowledges Golden Patriot, Corps intention to finance the company sufficient enough to meet its exploration obligations and payments to maintain its option on the Lucky Boy Property for the 2nd year work commitment and that this financing will take place within 30 days from March 17, 2006.




Also, pursuant to an option agreement signed October 21, 2005 (see attached) this letter further serves to acknowledge that Handley Minerals Inc. (Clive Ashworth) extends the nonqualified stock option for 1.1 million shares of the Corporations $.001 par value common stock for three years beginning March 17, 2006. The purchase price shall be $.10. Time and Manner of Exercise will be as described in the March 17, 2005 agreement between Golden Patriot, Corp and Clive Ashworth (“Grantee”).




Should any of the above conditions not be met, then Golden Patriot, Corp will be in immediate default and the option shall automatically terminate.




If you are in agreement with all of the above please acknowledge by signing in the space provided and fax to 604 926 0466 and mail original to Ashworth Explorations Ltd.






 

Thank you,




Dated this 17th day of March, 2006







/s/ Clive Ashworth




Clive Ashworth  

President,

Handley Minerals Inc.

Ashworth Explorations Ltd.







 










On Behalf of Golden Patriot, Corp







/s/ Bradley Rudman




Bradley Rudman

President and Director
###### Editorial Note on Part 192

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

#### § 192.756 Joining plastic pipe by heat fusion; equipment maintenance and calibration.

Each operator must maintain equipment used in joining plastic pipe in accordance with the manufacturer's recommended practices or with written procedures that have been proven by test and experience to produce acceptable joints.

[Amdt. 192-124, 83 FR 58719, Nov. 20, 2018]
-----Original Message----- 

From: rreid17@cox.net [mailto:rreid17@cox.net] 

Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 9:36 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 03, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Richard J Reid 

2618 W. Estes Way 

Phoenix, AZ 85041
#### County *v.*Clark.

The allowance of the accounts of the clerk by the presiding justice of the court is in the nature of a judgment, and conclusive as to the matters determined.

If the settlement is erroneous, it may be reopened and corrected by simple motion to the court and notice.

Assumpsit, to recover money alleged to have been received by the defendant, as clerk of court, in excess of the legal fees. The cause was committed to a referee; and it appearing that the sums claimed were items contained in the accounts of the defendant as clerk, which had been examined and allowed by the presiding justice at each term of court during the defendant’s term of office, the referee ruled that no fraud being alleged, the accounts could not be reopened in this suit.

*Whipple*and *Rogers,*for the plaintiff.

*Hutchinson*and *Barnard $*Barnard, for the defendant.

The judicial settlement is a judgment and a bar to this action. Gen. St., *e.*193, *ss.*4, 5, 10; *e.*24, s. 4; *e.*25, ««. 3, 6, 7; Freem. Judg., s. 531; *Ela*v. Smith, 5 Gray 121, 136; *Merrill*v. *Sher*burne, 1 N. H. 199, 204; *Sanborn*v. Fellows, 22 N. H. 473; *Gove*v. Epping, 41 N. H. 539 ; *Bolles*v. Bowen, 45 N. H. 124; *Hampstead*v. Plaistow, 49 N. H. 84, 99, 100; *Salisbury*v. County, 59 N. H. 359.

Clark, J.

The examination of the accounts of the defendant as clerk of the court, by the presiding justice, was the performance of a duty imposed by statute, and the order of approval was a determination of the claims considered and allowed, in the nature of a judgment, and is a bar to this action. The statute requiring an adjustment of the defendant’s account by the court does not give *210or leave to either of these parties an appeal from that adjustment by a suit at law. *Supervisors*v. Briggs, 2 Hill *135—S.*C*.,*2 Denio 26. If the settlement is erroneous, it may be reopened and corrected by proper proceedings, — by simple motion to the court and notice to the defendant; and this action may be continued in the trial term without costs to await the result. *Northumberland*v. *Cob*leigh, 59 N. H. 250, 256.

*Case discharged.*

' Foster, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
`[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, October 18, 1995 (130), Para 130.20 Providing for a Closed Conference--H.R. 2126]
[Page 1548]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.130.20  providing for a closed conference--h.r. 2126

  Mr. YOUNG of Florida, moved, pursuant to clause 6(a) of rule XXVIII, 
that the conference committee meetings between the House and the Senate 
on the bill (H.R. 2126) making appropriations for the Department of 
Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other 
purposes; be closed to the public at such times as classified national 
security information is under consideration; Provided, however, that any 
sitting Member of Congress shall have a right to attend any closed or 
open meeting.
  The question being put,
  Will the House agree to said motion?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaHOOD, announced that a roll call was 
required under clause 6(a), rule XXVIII, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

418

<3-line {>

affirmative

Nays

3`
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         1,416,509
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                     337,187
<MORTGAGE>                                   1,661,875
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               6,509,383
<CASH>                                         121,244
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             694,467
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         876,606
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,149,774
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              3,392,826
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             25,670
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          453,387
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,287,253
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,660,264)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,149,774
<PREMIUMS>                                   1,215,680
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            170,296
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              (1,532)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 701,256
<BENEFITS>                                     583,049
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    157,164
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           921,133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                425,886
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            425,886
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   425,886
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 961,697
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                              1,109,417
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 1, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Todd B.
Barnum, the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Todd B. Barnum
---------------------------------
Todd B. Barnum, Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer

September 3, 2004

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

                                       22
#### § 220.39 Continuous radio monitoring.

Each radio used in a railroad operation shall be turned on to the appropriate channel as designated in § 220.23 and adjusted to receive communications.
From: Edward Pete [mailto:epfrisco@gmail.com] 

Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 3:28 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA; Kimberly Pete

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Please - do not add additional regulatory burdens to brokers and financial advisors. I, like many 

Americans are well-versed in investment options for my family. I take my role as steward of our 

finances very seriously. More government regulations and fees simply is not necessary.

Thank you,

Ed Pete

Flower Mound, TX
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                              MAMMATECH CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mammatech Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 29, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Henry S.
Pennypacker, President and Chief Executive of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



By:  /s/  Henry S. Pennypacker                        Dated: April 19, 2004
   ----------------------------------
          Henry S. Pennypacker
Title:    President, Chief Executive Officer


This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
### From: Mike Hirvela < mike.hirvela@bayer.com >
Date: September 8, 2014 at 10:20:15 AM EDT

To: David Crank < david.crank@bayer.com > Subject: OHP Information on Aliette needed

Dave,

There is a request from the EPA to r educe the amount of Fosetyl Al that is allowed on the label of all registered products. We have a prop osal to the EPA that we are prepari ng and need to ask OHP if any of the language or amounts would be detrimental to their busin ess. I just got wind of this on Friday at 4:30. I apologize for the quick turnaround, however, I need to have our regulatory team an answer by Wednesday this week. Please see the questions below

1. How much Fosetyl is spray ed per acre by their customers ? High rate is 5# per 100 gallons. Typically 100 gallons will cover an acre of ornamentals unless they are treating plants with heavy foliage

2. How many applications and at what rate would be the worst case scenario that is applied (under the highest conceivable disease pressure)? Worst case would be 5# per 100 gallons. Repeat at 30 days

3. What is the typical interval between applications? At high rate of 5# per 100 interval is 30 days, 2.5# interval is 30 days, at 1.25 especially on bedding plants it is 14 days due to rapid plant growth(note usually not a repeat Aliette app but an alternative product)

4. What crops and locations is Fosetyl mostly used? Bedding and Flowering crops including tropical foliage. Some perennial plants outside due to pressure( Phytophthora, Pythium)

Also important part of Downy Mildew control programs such as for impatiens.

5. If Fosetyl registration was pulled what impac t (chemicaly) would it have on their business? It would require growers to switch to alternative root disease/downy mildew products such as Subdue, Terrazole, Segway or begin utilizing a Phos Acid product

6. Current proposal is for 144lbs AI/A/Yr, would this fit their model? Do not see a problem

7. Aerial applications are looking to be remov ed, would this affect any of OHP’s applications ? Impact

would be minor

8. Do they sell into other parallel markets? (Christmas tree farms, foresty, large conifer applications, aerial or otherwise) Minor usage. For most part would be tree nurseries not field operations