alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6044
RONALD JERRY SAWYER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, VDOC; W. E. MARTIN; COLIN ANGLICKER; K. L. OSBORNE, Warden; NURSE HALL, Defendants - Appellees, and
OFFICER THOMAS; LIEUTENANT JOHN SON; G. D. JOHNSON, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-657-R) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 28, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Jerry Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Richard Edward Ladd, Jr., PENN, STUART, ESKRIDGE & JONES, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellees.23 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant noted an appeal prior to the district court's action on his motions for default judgment and sanctions. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because there is no appealable order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). Appellant doesnot appeal a final order or an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We further deny Appellant's motion to remand the case and for sanctions against Appellees. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00630-CV

Scott Colin Wright, Appellant

v.

Rosa Maria Delgado, Individually and as next friend of M.D. and D.D., Minor Children, all

with an Interest in the Estate of Jose Alfredo Delgado, Deceased; Belinda Rojas Reyna,

Individually, as Heir to the Estate of Marco Aurelio Rodriguez Delgado, and as next friend

of Jose Marco Rodriguez Rojas and Humberto Emiliano Rodriguez Rojas, along with

Rogelio Manuel Rodriguez Galindo and Alma Delia Delgado De Rodriguez; and 

Jose Antonio Tovar, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 169TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 204,713-C, HONORABLE GORDON G. ADAMS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Scott Colin Wright and appellees Rosa Maria Delgado, et. al., have filed

a joint motion to abate this appeal and remand the proceedings to the district court. The joint motion

provides that the parties have reached a settlement agreement and that if the trial court approves the

settlement, the parties will file a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, we grant the

motion, abate the appeal, and permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the parties’

agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(C).
2

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Abated

Filed: January 18, 2008
§ 234.6 Penalties. ( a ) *Civil penalty.* Any person (an entity of any type covered under 1 U.S.C. 1, including but not limited to the following: A railroad; a manager, supervisor, official, or other employee or agent of a railroad; any owner, manufacturer, lessor, or lessee of railroad equipment, track, or facilities; any independent contractor providing goods or services to a railroad; and any employee of such owner, manufacturer, lessor, lessee, or independent contractor) who violates any requirement of this part, except for any violation of § 234.11, or causes the violation of any such requirement is subject to a civil penalty of at least $1,086, but not more than $35,516 per violation, except that: Penalties may be assessed against individuals only for willful violations, and where a grossly negligent violation or a pattern of repeated violations has created an imminent hazard of death or injury to persons, or has caused death or injury, a penalty not to exceed $142,063 per violation may be assessed. Each day a violation continues shall constitute a separate offense. FRA's website at *www.fra.dot.gov* contains a schedule of civil penalty amounts used in connection with this part. The railroad is not responsible for compliance with respect to any condition inconsistent with the technical standards set forth in this part where such variance arises as a result of actions beyond the control of the railroad and the railroad could not have prevented the variance through the exercise of due diligence. The foregoing sentence does not excuse any instance of noncompliance resulting from the actions of the railroad's employees, agents, or contractors.
( b ) *Criminal penalty.* Whoever knowingly and willfully makes, causes to be made, or participates in the making of a false entry in reports required to be filed by this part, or files a false report or other document required to be filed by this part, except for any document filed pursuant to § 234.11, is subject to a $5,000 fine and 2 years imprisonment as prescribed by 49 U.S.C. 522(a) and 21311(a).
[74 FR 36558, June 28, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 24422, Apr. 24, 2012; 81 FR 43111, July 1, 2016; 82 FR 16134, Apr. 3, 2017; 83 FR 60749, Nov. 27, 2018; 84 FR 23736, May 23, 2019; 84 FR 37074, July 31, 2019; 86 FR 1759, Jan. 11, 2021; 86 FR 23255, May 3, 2021; 87 FR 15869, Mar. 21, 2022; 88 FR 1128, Jan. 6, 2023; 88 FR 89563, Dec. 28, 2023]
§ 29.903 What determinations may not be appealed under this subpart? A Tribe may not appeal the following determinations under this subpart: ( a ) *Waiver determination.* A waiver determination made pursuant to § 29.534 is a final agency action subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act.
( b ) *Disputes or appeals arising under other Federal laws.* Decisions made under other Federal statutes, such as the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act. Such decisions may be appealable under those statutes and their implementing regulations.
( c ) *Selection and award decisions for discretionary or competitive grants.* The Department's selection and level of funding decisions for discretionary or competitive grants are not subject to appeal.
EXHIBIT
21.5
 
 
 
 JERSEY CENTRAL
POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE
REGISTRANT
 AT DECEMBER 31,
2004
 
 
 
 STATE
      OFNAME OF
      SUBSIDIARY
    
    BUSINESS
    
    ORGANIZATIONJCP&L
      Preferred Capital, Inc.
    
    
    Special-Purpose
      Finance
    
    
    DelawareJCP&L
      Capital, L.P.
    
    
    Special-Purpose
      Finance
    
    
    DelawareJCP&L
      Transition Funding LLC
    
    
    Special-Purpose
      Finance
    
    
    Delaware
 
 
 Note:  JCP&L, along
with its affiliates Met-Ed and Penelec, collectively own all of the common stock
of Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation, a Pennsylvania nonprofit corporation
organized for nuclear experimental purposes which is now inactive. The carrying
value of the owners’ investment has been written down to a nominal
value.
### PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF

THE APPLIANCE STANDARDS RULEMAKING PROCESS March 19-20, 1996 Proposed Agenda Tuesday, March 19, 1996 9:00 AM - 4:30 PM 9:00 AM v Welcoming Remarks and Overview • Assistant Secretary Christine Ervin 9:15 - 9:30 v Introductions, Agenda Review, Ground Rules 9:30 - 10:45 •;. Presentation: "Major Themes" of the Stakeholder Consultations - Question and Answer by Segment - General Discussion 10:45 - 11:00 11:00 - 12:30
12:30 - 1:30 1:30 - 1:45 

### 1:45 - 3:15 3:15 - 3:45 3:45 - 4:00 Break

Detailed Presentation: Department of Energy's "Process Improvement Plan" based on Stakeholder Consultations - General Discussion v LUNCH (on your own) v Overview Presentation: Analytical Improvements Agenda - General Discussion Small Group Discussion to Answer Additional Questions: - "Major Themes" - Process Improvement Plan - Analysis Improvement Plan Report back and Discussion on Small Group Results • Doug Brookman • Doug Brookman • All • Michael McCabe, Director Office of Codes & Standards • Mark Friedrichs, Deputy Dir. Energy Efficiency & Alternative Fuels Policy 

### • All • Michael McCabe • All 

### • All • Rapporteurs • All v Closing Discussion • All 

## PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE APPLIANCE STANDARDS RULEMAKING PROCESS March 19-20, 1996

9:00 AM 9: 15 - 9:30 9:30 - 10:45 

### Proposed Agenda Tuesday, March 19, 1996 9:00AM-4:30PM

.:. WelcomingRemarks and Overview .:. Introductions,AgendaReview, Ground Rules .:. Presentation: "Major Themes" of the Stakeholder Consultations

- Question andAnswerby Segment

- General Discussion 10:45 - 11:00 .:. Break 11:00 - 12:30 .:. Detailed Presentation: Department ofEnergy's "Process Improvement Plan" based on Stakeholder Consultations

- General Discussion 12:30 - 1:30 .:. LUNCH (on your own) 1:30 - 1:45 1:45 - 3: 15 3:15 - 3:45 3:45 - 4:00 .:. Overview Presentation: Analytical ImprovementsAgenda

- General Discussion .:. Small Group Discussion to AnswerAdditional Questions:

- "Major Themes"

- Process Improvement Plan

- Analysis Improvement Plan .:. Reportback and Discussion on Small Group Results .:. Closing Discussion • AssistantSecretary Christine Ervin • Doug Brookman
• Doug Brookman • All • Michael McCabe, Director Office ofCodes & Standards • Mark Friedrichs, Deputy Dir.

Energy Efficiency & AlternativeFuels Policy • All • Michael McCabe • All • All
• Rapporteurs • All • All

### Proposed Agenda Wednesday, March 20, 1996 9:05 - 9:15 Analysis Imp. Plan 

### 9:15 - Small Groups Priority Setting Screening Impact Analysis 

### 10:10 Report Outs 10:40 Break 10:55 Transition Issues 11:00 Small Groups (by Product) HVAC & Water Heating White Goods Electrical Products 12:00 Report Outs 

### 12:30 Closing - Next Steps Proposed Agenda Wednesday, March 20, 1996 9:05 - 9:15 Analysis Imp. Plan 9:15 - 

### Small Groups Priority Setting Screening Impact Analysis 10:10 Report Outs 10:40 Break 10:55 Transition Issues 11:00 Small Groups (by Product) HVAC & 

### Water Heating White Goods Electrical Products 12:00 Report Outs 12:30 Closing - Next Steps
-----Original Message-----

From: David King [mailto:drk29369@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 11:59 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

This is a horrible plan and a direct invasion of rights Americans are supposed to have in a free society. 

Keep your noses out of my business and my IRA. I don't need or want the government putting 

restrictions on my investing choices. The federal government screws up everything it sticks it's nose in.
From: pfmargo@roadrunner.com [mailto:pfmargo@roadrunner.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:28 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Phil Margo 

140 South Almont Drive 

Beverly Hills, CA 90211
#### § 236.784 Position, deenergized.

The position assumed by the moving member of an electromagnetic device when the device is deprived of its operating current.
From: Robert C. Port [mailto:rport@gadisputes.com] 

Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 5:43 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

I write in favor of the DOL’s Best Interest Rule. 

It is entirely fair and appropriate that those who offer financial advice regarding retirement (or indeed, offer any other 

personal financial advice) should be held to a standard that requires them to put their clients’ best interests first, 

rather than their own personal pecuniary interests.

The fact that many in the financial industry vigorously oppose this rule should give policy makers pause, and provides 

the highest and best evidence of the critical need for its implementation. 

Robert C. Port

 Gaslowitz Frankel LLC

 4500 SunTrust Plaza

 303 Peachtree Street, NE

 Atlanta, Georgia 30308-3243

 404.892.9797

 404.892.1311 Fax

rport@gadisputes.com

www.gaslowitzfrankel.com

Editor, Georgia Business Litigation (Published by Daily Report Books, a division of ALM Media 

LLC), www.lawcatalog.com/ProductDetail/18007/Georgia-Business-Litigation

AV Rated, Martindale- Hubbell, www.martindale.com

Georgia Super Lawyer, www.superlawyers.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
=======================================================================
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
the company's  financial  statements as of and for the year ended  March 31,
2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
=======================================================================
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                   Apr-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     Mar-31-2000

<CASH>                               387,087
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                     37,795,475
<ALLOWANCES>                       1,388,172
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           0
<PP&E>                               658,342
<DEPRECIATION>                       492,067
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    37,944,940

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      0
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                          20,607,376

<OTHER-SE>                           979,802
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      37,944,940

<SALES>                            5,145,936
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   5,145,936
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      67,260
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     180,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 1,110,202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    3,092,755
<INCOME-TAX>                          32,940
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                       3,059,815

<EPS-BASIC>                              .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .44



</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 190

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 190 appear at 78 FR 58908, Sept. 25, 2013.

#### § 190.321 Contents of written comments.

All written comments must be in English. Any interested person should submit as part of written comments all material considered relevant to any statement of fact. Incorporation of material by reference should be avoided; however, where necessary, such incorporated material must be identified by document title and page.

[Amdt. 190-16, 78 FR 58914, Sept. 25, 2013]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 50653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4299]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 4, 2007 / 
Notices

[[Page 50653]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Deschutes Provincial Advisory Committee (DPAC); Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Deschutes Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on 
September 27th, 2007, starting at 8 a.m. at the Sisters Ranger 
District, Pine Street and Highway 20, Sisters, Oregon. It will be a 2-
hour business meeting and then a joint field trip with Central Oregon 
Partnership for Wildfire Risk Reduction (COPWRR) to monitor the Green 
Thin Project. The trip is scheduled to end at 4:30 p.m. in Sisters. All 
Deschutes Province Advisory Committee Meetings are open to the public 
and an open public forum is scheduled from 4 to 4:30 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Mickle, Province Liaison, 
Crescent Ranger District, Highway 97, Crescent, Oregon, 97733, Phone 
(541) 433-3216.

John Allen,
Deschutes National Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07-4299 Filed 8-31-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
|   | 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form      10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, fully complies with      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,      2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of Benda Pharmaceutical,    Inc. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      August 19, 2009                     |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |
| /s/ Yiqing Wan                                 |
| Yiqing      WanPresident,      CEO andDirector |

----

|  | 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form      10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, fully complies with      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,      2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of  Benda Pharmaceutical,      Inc. |
|--|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      August 19, 2009                                            |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                  |
| /s/ Eric Yu                                                           |
| Eric      YuCFO      and PrincipalAccounting      Officer andDirector |

----
§ 244.17 Procedures. ( a ) Each applicant shall file one original of a proposed Safety Integration Plan with the Associate Administrator for Safety, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Mail Stop 25, Washington, DC, 20590, no later than 60 days after the date it files its application with the Surface Transportation Board.
( b ) The applicant shall submit such additional information necessary to support its proposed Safety Integration Plan as FRA may require to satisfy the requirements of this part.
( c ) The applicant shall coordinate with FRA to resolve FRA's comments on the proposed Safety Integration Plan until such plan is approved.
( d ) FRA will file its findings and conclusions on the proposed Safety Integration Plan with the Board's Section of Environmental Analysis at a date sufficiently in advance of the Board's issuance of its draft environmental documentation in the case to permit incorporation in the draft environmental document.
( e ) Assuming FRA approves the proposed Safety Integration Plan and the Surface Transportation Board approves the transaction and adopts the Plan, each applicant involved in the transaction shall coordinate with FRA in implementing the approved Safety Integration Plan.
( f ) During implementation of an approved Safety Integration Plan, FRA expects that an applicant may change and refine its Safety Integration Plan in response to unforeseen developments. An applicant shall communicate with FRA about such developments and submit amendments to its Safety Integration Plan to FRA for approval.
( g ) During implementation of an approved Safety Integration Plan, FRA will inform the Surface Transportation Board about implementation of the plan at times and in a manner designed to aid the Board's exercise of its continuing jurisdiction over the approved transaction in accordance with an agreement that FRA and the Board will enter into and execute. Pursuant to such agreement, FRA will consult with the Board at all appropriate stages of implementation, and will advise the Board on the status of the implementation process: ( 1 ) For a period of no more than five years after the Board approves the transaction,
( 2 ) For an oversight period for the transaction established by the Board, or
( 3 ) Until FRA advises the Board in writing that the integration of operations subject to the transaction is complete, whichever is shorter.
( h ) *Request for Confidential Treatment.* Each applicant requesting that advanced drafts of the proposed Safety Integration Plan and information in support of the proposed and approved plan that are filed with FRA receive confidential treatment shall comply with the procedures enumerated at 49 CFR 209.11.
[67 FR 11604, Mar. 15, 2002, as amended at 74 FR 25176, May 27, 2009]
#### Timothy A. Smith and another, Appellants, v. Thomas Brady, Respondent.

Order granting new trial affirmed, with costs. Order striking out answer, etc., affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Merwin, J.
#### § 29.403 When must the Department transfer to a Tribe the funds identified in a funding agreement?

When a funding agreement requires an annual transfer of funds to be made by the Department at the beginning of a fiscal year, or requires semiannual or other periodic transfers of funds to be made to a Tribe, the Department will make the first transfer no later than 10 days after the apportionment of such funds by the Office of Management and Budget to the Department, unless the funding agreement provides otherwise. Consistent with the Prompt Payment Act, the Department is not responsible for any interest penalty if the Department makes the transfer within 30 days.
From: Lisa Gilmore [mailto:gilmore.lisa@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2015 2:27 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject:

I think more obvious fee structures when using an ira, 401k, 403B are essential if you want 

individual investors to manage their own retirement accounts. Thank you, lisa gilmore