alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            2058
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       25
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2434
<PP&E>                                            5736
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2649
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              199
<BONDS>                                           4705
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         716
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5620
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 26089
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      753
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  24678
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              24678
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1337)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     23341
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   295.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   295.63
        

</TABLE>
#### Stephen S. Wilson, *Appellant, v.*Pardon T. Dix and another Respondents.—

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Barker, J.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEffects of gear box vibration and mass imbalance on the dynamics of multi-stage gear transmissionsThe dynamic behavior of multistage gear transmission system, with the effects of gear-box-induced vibrations and rotor mass-imbalances is analyzed. The model method, using undamped frequencies and planar mode shapes, is used to reduce the degree-of-freedom of the system. The various rotor-bearing stages as well as lateral and torsional vibrations of each individual stage are coupled through localized gear-mesh-tooth interactions. Gear-box vibrations are coupled to the gear stage dynamics through bearing support forces. Transient and steady state dynamics of lateral and torsional vibrations of the geared system are examined in both time and frequency domain. A typical three-staged geared system is used as an example. Effects of mass-imbalance and gear box vibrations on the system dynamic behavior are presented in terms of modal excitation functions for both lateral and torsional vibrations. Operational characteristics and conclusions are drawn from the results presented.Document ID19910012221Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsChoy, Fred K.*(Akron Univ. OH., United States)*Tu, Yu K.*(Akron Univ. OH., United States)*Zakrajsek, James J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Townsend, Dennis P.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1991Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:103695NASA-TM-103695E-5916AVSCOM-TR-90-C-022Accession Number91N21534Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-51PROJECT: DA PROJ. 1L1-62211-A-47-ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910012221.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### William A. Street et al., Respondents, *v.*Clarence H. Galt, Appellant.

*Street*v. *Galt,*136 App. Div. 724, affirmed.

(Argued May 15, 1911;

decided May 30, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 18,1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover on contract.

*Walter C. Anthony*for appellant.

*William Allaire Shortt*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
# Official Journal L 252/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 252 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6415 July 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 252

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6415 July 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1161 of 13 July 2021 amending Decision 2011/891/EU and Implementing Decisions (EU) 2017/1211, (EU) 2017/1212, (EU) 2017/2449, (EU) 2019/2085 and (EU) 2019/2086 as regards the authorisation holder and its representative in the Union for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from certain genetically modified organisms
  (notified under document C(2021) 5148)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Amendments to UN Regulation 44 [2020/1223] – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of restraining devices for child occupants of power-driven vehicles (‘Child Restraint Systems’) [2021/1162] | 7 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1161 of 13 July 2021 amending Decision 2011/891/EU and Implementing Decisions (EU) 2017/1211, (EU) 2017/1212, (EU) 2017/2449, (EU) 2019/2085 and (EU) 2019/2086 as regards the authorisation holder and its representative in the Union for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from certain genetically modified organisms
  (notified under document C(2021) 5148)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2021) 5148)

1

1

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Amendments to UN Regulation 44 [2020/1223] – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of restraining devices for child occupants of power-driven vehicles (‘Child Restraint Systems’) [2021/1162]

7

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### § 239.107 [Reserved]
-----Original Message-----

From: Arthur Gruber, CLU [mailto:arthurgruber@netzero.net] 

Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 2:02 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN1210-AB32

I wish to comment on the above-Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE 84-24). I have been an 

insurance broker for 50 years and have used Annuities along with Mutual Funds and Life Insurance to 

help individuals and Companies plan for their future and fund their financial obligations.

I have been subject to the Department of Financial Services (formerly State Insurance Dept) for all those 

years. I have endured the burden of compliance and realized that it was meant as a protection for 

consumers. Each state operates differently and within the province of their State Insurance Department.

The business model of Insurance Companies compensating the broker for selling a financial product 

(annuities) has worked extremely well and has served a public service to the extent that consumers are 

not reluctant to consider a product in which their are no fees attached to it. Conversely, consumers will I 

believe have hesitancy in paying a fee to a financial advisor to purchase a product such as a fixed 

annuity. This will substantially diminish the middle class market for savings using this product as there is

little or no experience for paying a "fee" to purchase a product that was formerly "free".

There is no logical reason to extend DOL's reach to the fixed annuity market. It is not a security! That is 

evident. This seems to be simply overreach by the Federal Government to control ALL financial 

transactions. The Federal Government has a spotty record of oversight:

IRS, Veterans Administration. Why do you believe that extending the bureaucracy further, will result in 

better oversight and more efficiency.

I doubt that it will...I believe the motivation is simply to usurp those powers left to the states and to 

make the Federal Government omnipotent in all financial matters. Did not our Constituion give powers 

to the states that are NOT EXPRESSLY GIVEN TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. This is clearly a power that 

should not now be moved to the Federal Government!

Sincerely,

Arthur Gruber CLU

Arthur K. Gruber, CLU

55 Old Turnpike Road Suite 102

Nanuet, NY 10954-2449

Phone: 845-627-2136

Fax: 845-627-2139

email: arthurgruber@netzero.net

 agruberinc@optonline.net
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

WILSON HARVEY SHAFER, JR.
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 653

[ February 17, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Martin County ; Sherwood Bauer, Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No.

432018CF001138A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sorraya M. Solages

- Jones , Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH

, K UNTZ and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 51840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4431]



[[Page 51840]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--DVD Copy Control Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 15, 2007, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), DVD Copy Control Association 
(``DVD CCA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Bestguide Group Limited, Kowloon, Hong Kong-China; 
Coresystem Technology Limited, Kowloon, Hong Kong-China; CustomFlix 
Labs, Inc., Scotts Valley, CA; Dong Kwang Display Co., Ltd., Gyeonggi-
Do, Republic of Korea; Estorage Technology Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan; 
and Tonfunk GmbH Ermsleben, Falkenstein/Harz, Germany have been added 
as parties to this venture. Also, Taiwan Thick-Film Ind. Corp., Taipei 
Hsien, TAIWAN has withdrawn as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and DVD CCA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 21, 
2007. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on June 8, 2007 (72 FR 31856).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-4431 Filed 9-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
-----Original Message----- 

From: bikejon@yahoo.com [mailto:bikejon@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 9:47 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 04, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

John O'Dowd 

61 old Marlboro Rd 

Maynard, MA 01754
Exhibit
32.1
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A No. 2
of China International Tourism Holdings Ltd (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Lei, Ming, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
that:
  * the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  * the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  CHINA
      INTERNATIONAL TOURISM HOLDINGS LTD
                (Registrant)Date:  September
      2 , 2008
              By:
              /s/ Lei,
      MingLei,
      Ming
                Chief
      Executive Officer
  This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
#### Phillips Weeks, *Respondent, v.*William H. Clark and others, *Appellants.*

Order refusing to set aside sale affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Pratt, J.
Boiler ID Pollutant Emission limit Units Averaging Period Comments

U1B PM 0.1 lb/MMBtu 3-hour

Filterable PM/PM 10 0.030 lb/MMBtu 3-hour After installation of new FGD SO2 0.8 lb/MMBtu 3-hour 0.08 lb/MMBtu 30-day After 1/1/2012 95 % removal 30-day After 1/1/2012 CO 3.6 lb/MMBtu 1-hour 0.5 lb/MMBtu 30-days NOX 0.46 lb/MMBtu Annual 0.320 lb/MMBtu 30-days U2B PM 0.1 lb/MMBtu 3-hour

Filterable PM/PM 10 0.030 lb/MMBtu 3-hour After installation of new FGD SO2 0.8 lb/MMBtu 3-hour 0.08 lb/MMBtu 30-day After 1/1/2013 95 % removal 30-day After 1/1/2013 CO 3.6 lb/MMBtu 1-hour After installation of Low NOx Burners 0.5 lb/MMBtu 30-days After installation of Low NOx Burners NOX 0.46 lb/MMBtu Annual 0.320 lb/MMBtu 30-days After June 1, 2011 0.080 lb/MMBtu 30-days After June 1, 2014 H2SO4Mist 0.012 lb/MMBtu 3-hour After June 1, 2014 0.006 lb/MMBtu 3-hour If achievable after SCR testing Emission Limits for Boilers ID U1B and U2B SRP Coronado Generating Station
#### § 22.63 Loan close outs.

Upon full repayment of the STLP loan, or upon expiration of the loan guarantee, the Participating Lender must submit to OSDBU a form DOT F 2304-1 Bank Acknowledgement Loan Close-Out Form. The form is available at *http://www.osdbu.dot.gov/financial/docs/Loan_Close-Out_DOT_F_2304-1.pdf.*
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 12, 2017.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D15-1368

Lower Tribunal No. 14-19880

________________

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., etc.,

Appellant,

vs.

Reginald L. Wellman, etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Gerald D.

Hubbart, Senior Judge.

Robertson Anschutz & Schneid and Heidi J. Bassett and David Rosenberg

(Boca Raton), for appellant.

The Ticktin Law Group and Kendrick Almaguer (Deerfield Beach), for

appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

EMAS, J. 
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. appeals from a final judgment involuntarily

dismissing its foreclosure complaint, upon the trial court’s determination that the

lender failed to comply with conditions precedent prior to filing its foreclosure

lawsuit. Specifically, the trial court determined that the lender’s1 notice of default

and intent to accelerate failed to comply with paragraph 22 of the mortgage

agreement. Upon our de novo review, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Craig, 193 So.

3d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016), we find that the notice substantially complied with

paragraph 22 of the mortgage. 

The relevant facts of the instant case are indistinguishable from those in our

recent decisions in Craig, 193 So. 3d at 77; Bank of New York v. Mieses, 187 So.

3d 919 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Bank of America v. Cadet, 183 So. 3d 477 (Fla. 3d

DCA 2016); Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. v. Garcia, 186 So. 3d 1036 (Fla. 3d DCA

2016); and Bank of New York Mellon v. Nunez, 180 So. 3d 160 (Fla. 3d DCA

2015). In those cases we held (as we hold in the instant case) that the notice of

default substantially complied with the default notice provision contained in

paragraph 22 of the mortgage. We therefore reverse and remand for further

proceedings consistent with this opinion. 

Reversed and remanded.

1 U.S. Bank was substituted in as party plaintiff during the proceedings below. 

2
#### § 236.777 Operator, control.

An employee assigned to operate the control machine of a traffic control system.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A.
Morrissey, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ John A. Morrissey
-------------------------------------
Name: John A. Morrissey
Title: Chief Executive Officer
       (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: March 20, 2008


                                       64
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0662 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Mary Hill 

Address: 

OH, 

General Comment 

On behalf of NAMI Montgomery County, I am writing to submit comments on the Interim Final 

Rules under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act 

of 2008 and in doing so NAMI Montgomery County endorses the separate comments submitted 

by the Parity Implementation Coalition and the National Alliance on Mental Illness. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: May 03, 2010 

Received: April 30, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ae4b38 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 5/3/2010
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 28, 1995 (122), Para 122.28 Adjournment]
[Page 1466]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.122.28  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, at 8 o'clock and 40 minutes p.m., the 
House adjourned.
```
§ 238.409 Forward end structures of power car cabs. This section contains requirements for the forward end structure of the cab of a power car. (A conceptual implementation of this end structure is provided in Figure 1 to this subpart.) ( a ) *Center collision post.* The forward end structure shall have a full-height center collision post, or its structural equivalent, capable of withstanding the following: ( 1 ) A shear load of 500,000 pounds at its joint with the underframe without exceeding the ultimate strength of the joint;
( 2 ) A shear load of 150,000 pounds at its joint with the roof without exceeding the ultimate strength of the joint; and
( 3 ) A horizontal, longitudinal force of 300,000 pounds, applied at a point on level with the bottom of the windshield, without exceeding its ultimate strength.
( b ) *Side collision posts.* The forward end structure shall have two side collision posts, or their structural equivalent, located at approximately the one-third points laterally, each capable of withstanding the following: ( 1 ) A shear load of 500,000 pounds at its joint with the underframe without exceeding the ultimate strength of the joint; and
( 2 ) A horizontal, longitudinal force of 300,000 pounds, applied at a point on level with the bottom of the windshield, without exceeding its ultimate strength.
( c ) *Corner posts.* The forward end structure shall have two full-height corner posts, or their structural equivalent, each capable of withstanding the following: ( 1 ) A horizontal, longitudinal or lateral shear load of 300,000 pounds at its joint with the underframe, without exceeding the ultimate strength of the joint;
( 2 ) A horizontal, lateral force of 100,000 pounds applied at a point 30 inches up from the underframe attachment, without exceeding the yield or the critical buckling stress; and
( 3 ) A horizontal, longitudinal or lateral shear load of 80,000 pounds at its joint with the roof, without exceeding the ultimate strength of the joint.
( d ) *Skin.* The skin covering the forward-facing end of each power car shall be: ( 1 ) Equivalent to a 1 ⁄ 2-inch steel plate with a 25,000 pounds-per-square-inch yield strength—material of a higher yield strength may be used to decrease the required thickness of the material provided at least an equivalent level of strength is maintained;
( 2 ) Securely attached to the end structure; and
( 3 ) Sealed to prevent the entry of fluids into the occupied cab area of the equipment. As used in paragraph (d), the term “skin” does not include forward-facing windows and doors.