57846 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 184 / Thursday, September 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

The AMOC approval letter must specifically 

reference this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any 

requirement in this AD to obtain corrective 

actions from a manufacturer or other source, 

use these actions if they are FAA-approved. 

Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State 

of Design Authority (or their delegated 

agent). You are required to assure the product 

is airworthy before it is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(i) Refer to MCAI Israeli Airworthiness 

Directive 01–10–01–07R1, dated January 20, 

2010, for related information. 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(j) None. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

September 10, 2010. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23741 Filed 9–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2010–0632; Directorate 

Identifier 2010–CE–025–AD; Amendment 

39–16426; AD 2010–18–12] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Robert E. 

Rust, Jr. Model DeHavilland DH.C1 

Chipmunk 21, DH.C1 Chipmunk 22, 

and DH.C1 Chipmunk 22A Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting an 

airworthiness directive (AD) that 

published in the Federal Register. That 

AD applies to the products listed above. 

The AD number in the 14 CFR Part 39 

section and the § 39.13 [Amended] 

section is incorrect. This document 

corrects that error. In all other respects, 

the original document remains the 

same. 

DATES: This AD remains effective 

October 7, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The address for the 

Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is 

Document Management Facility, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Carey O’Kelley, Aerospace Engineer, 

FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification 

Office (ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, 

College Park, Georgia 30337; telephone: 

(404) 474–5543; fax: (404) 474–5606; 

e-mail: carey.o’kelley@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Airworthiness Directive 2010–18–12, 

amendment 39–16426 (75 FR 53861, 

September 2, 2010), currently requires 

you to do a one-time inspection of the 

flap operating system for an unapproved 

latch plate design installation, with 

replacement as necessary for Robert E. 

Rust, Jr. Model DeHavilland DH.C1 

Chipmunk 21, DH.C1 Chipmunk 22, and 

DH.C1 Chipmunk 22A airplanes. 

As published, the AD number in the 

14 CFR Part 39 section and § 39.13 

[Amended] section is incorrect. 

No other part of the preamble or 

regulatory information has been 

changed; therefore, only the changed 

portion of the final rule is being 

published in the Federal Register. 

The effective date of this AD remains 

October 7, 2010. 

Correction of Non-Regulatory Text 

In the Federal Register of September 

2, 2010, AD 2010–18–12; Amendment 

39–16426 is corrected as follows: 

On page 53861, in the 3rd column, on 

line 6 under 14 CFR Part 39, change ‘‘AD 

2010–18–01’’ to ‘‘AD 2010–18–12.’’ 

On page 53863, in the 1st column, on 

line 4 under § 39.13 [Amended], change 

‘‘AD 2010–18–01’’ to ‘‘AD 2010–18–12.’’ 

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 

16, 2010. 

William J. Timberlake, 

Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23745 Filed 9–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2010–0777; Airspace 

Docket No. 10–ASO–29] 

Amendment of Class E Airspace; 

Brewton, AL 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule, technical 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: This action amends Class E 

airspace at Brewton Municipal Airport, 

Brewton, AL, by updating the 

geographic coordinates of the airport to 

aid in the navigation of our National 

Airspace System. 

DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC. 

October 25, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Melinda Giddens, Operations Support 

Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal 

Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 

20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; 

telephone (404) 305–5610. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

The FAA received a request from the 

National Aeronautical Navigation 

Services (NANS) to update the 

geographic coordinates of Brewton 

Municipal Airport, Brewton, AL. This 

action makes the adjustment. 

Accordingly, since this is an 

administrative change, and does not 

involve a change in the dimensions or 

operating requirements of that airspace, 

notice and public procedures under 

5 U.S.C. 553(b) are unnecessary. 

The Class E airspace designations are 

published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA 

order 7400.9U, dated August 18, 2010, 

and effective September 15, 2010, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designations 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them, operationally 

current, is non-controversial and 

unlikely to result in adverse or negative 

comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a Regulatory 

Evaluation as the anticipated impact is 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1