46490 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 160 / Monday, August 20, 2007 / Notices 

Model Confidentiality Agreement 

Provisions (For Use in the Case of 

Investment Management Activities). As 

noted above, blank copies of each of 

these model documents are posted on 

OGE’s Web site. 

The communications formats and the 

confidentiality agreements (items ii. (A), 

(I) and (J) above), once completed, 

would not be available to the public 

because they contain sensitive, 

confidential information. All the other 

completed model trust certificates and 

model trust documents (except for any 

trust provisions that relate to the 

testamentary disposition of trust assets) 

are publicly available based upon a 

proper Ethics Act request (by filling out 

an OGE Form 201 access form). 

Reporting Burden 

The Office of Government Ethics 

administers the qualified trust program 

for the executive branch. Therefore, the 

estimated burden figures provided 

below represent branchwide 

implementation of the forms. The 

estimated hour burden, which remains 

the same as last indicated by OGE in its 

prior second round paperwork renewal 

notice in 2005 (70 FR 31471–31472 June 

1, 2005), is based on the amount of time 

imposed on a trust administrator or 

private representative. 

i. Trust Certificates: 

A. Certificate of Independence: Total 

filers (executive branch): 5; private 

citizen filers (100%): 5; private citizen 

burden hours (20 minutes/certificate): 2. 

B. Certificate of Compliance: Total 

filers (executive branch): 10; private 

citizen filers (100%): 10; private citizen 

burden hours (20 minutes/certificate): 3; 

and 

ii. Model Qualified Trust Documents: 

A. Blind Trust Communications: Total 

users (executive branch): 5; private 

citizen users (100%): 5; 

communications documents (private 

citizens): 25 (based on an average of five 

communications per user, per year); 

private citizen burden hours (20 

minutes/communication): 8. 

B. Model Qualified Blind Trust: Total 

users (executive branch): 2; private 

citizen users (100%): 2; private citizen 

burden hours (100 hours/model): 200. 

C. Model Qualified Diversified Trust: 

Total users (executive branch): 1; 

private citizen users (100%): 1; private 

citizen burden hours (100 hours/model): 

100. 

D.–H. Of the five remaining model 

qualified trust documents: total users 

(executive branch): 2; private citizen 

users (100%): 2; private citizen burden 

hours (100 hours/model): 200. 

I.–J. Of the two model confidentiality 

agreements: total users (executive 

branch): 1; private citizen users (100%): 

1; private citizen burden hours (50 

hours/agreement): 50. 

However, the total annual reporting 

hour burden on filers themselves is zero 

and not the 563 hours estimated above 

because OGE’s estimating methodology 

reflects the fact that all respondents hire 

private trust administrators or other 

private representatives to set up and 

maintain the qualified blind and 

diversified trusts. Respondents 

themselves, typically incoming private 

citizen Presidential nominees, therefore 

incur no hour burden. The estimated 

total annual cost burden to respondents 

resulting from the collection of 

information is $1,000,000. Those who 

use the model documents for guidance 

are private trust administrators or other 

private representatives hired to set up 

and maintain the qualified blind and 

diversified trusts of executive branch 

officials who seek to establish qualified 

trusts. The cost burden figure is based 

primarily on OGE’s knowledge of the 

typical trust administrator fee structure 

(an average of 1 percent of total assets) 

and OGE’s experience with 

administration of the qualified trust 

program. The $1,000,000 annual cost 

figure is based on OGE’s estimate of an 

average of five active trusts anticipated 

to be under administration for each of 

the next two years with combined total 

assets of $100,000,000. However, OGE 

notes that the $1,000,000 figure is a cost 

estimate for the overall administration 

of the trusts, only a portion of which 

relates to information collection and 

reporting. For want of a precise way to 

break out the costs directly associated 

with information collection, OGE is 

continuing to report to OMB the full 

$1,000,000 estimate for paperwork 

clearance purposes. 

Consideration of Comments 

On May 14, 2007, OGE published a 

first round notice of its intent to request 

paperwork clearance for the proposed 

unmodified qualified trust certificates 

and model trust documents. See 72 FR 

27132–27134. OGE received only one 

response to that notice, which was 

critical of the Government, and 

provided no specific comment about the 

proposed renewal of these documents. 

In this second notice, public comment 

is again invited on the qualified trust 

certificates and model trust documents, 

and underlying regulatory provisions, as 

set forth in this notice, including 

specific views on the need for and 

practical utility of this set of collections 

of information, the accuracy of OGE’s 

burden estimate, the potential for 

enhancement of quality, utility and 

clarity of the information collected, and 

the minimization of burden (including 

the use of information technology). 

The Office of Government Ethics, in 

consultation with OMB, will consider 

all comments received, which will 

become a matter of public record. 

Approved: August 13, 2007. 

Robert I. Cusick, 

Director, Office of Government Ethics. 

[FR Doc. E7–16305 Filed 8–17–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6345–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Administration for Children and 

Families 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

Title: Case Plan Requirement, Section 

422, 471(a)(16), 475(1) and 475(5)(A) of 

the Social Security Act. 

OMB No.: 0980–0140. 

Description: The Administration for 

Children and Families (ACF) is 

requesting authority to renew an 

existing information collection that is 

expiring October 31, 2007. The 

collection of information for the case 

plan requirement is authorized by titles 

IV–B, Section 422 (42 U.S.C. 422), and 

IV–E, Sections 471 and 475 (42 U.S.C. 

471 and 475) of the Social Security Act 

(the Act). States must develop State 

plans for both titles IV–B and IV–E that 

are approved by the Secretary, U.S. 

Department of Health and Human 

Services. Both plans require that States 

maintain a case review system that 

periodically reviews case plans 

developed for each child receiving 

services under the Act. 

Title IV–B provides for child welfare 

services funding and title IV–E provides 

for foster care maintenance payments 

for eligible children. Sections 422(b)(2) 

and (8)(A)(ii) of the Act require States to 

coordinate services and assistance 

under Federal programs, including titles 

IV–B and IV–E, and to ensure that States 

are operating a case review system that 

meets the requirements of section 475(5) 

of the Act. 

Title IV–E funding, Section 471(a) of 

the Act, requires that State plans 

provide for the development of a case 

plan for each child receiving foster care 

maintenance payments and provide for 

a case review system that meets the 

requirements described in section 

475(5)(B) of the Act with respect to each 

child. 

The case plan is a written document 

that provides a narrative description of 

the child-specific program of care that 

addresses the needs of each child 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 160 / Monday, August 20, 2007 / Notices 46491 

regarding safety, permanency and wellbeing. Federal regulations at 45 CFR 

1356.21(g) and section 475(1) of the Act 

delineate the specific information that 

should be addressed in the case plan. 

ACF neither specifies a recordkeeping 

format for the case plan nor requires 

submission of the case plan to the 

Federal Government. Case plan 

information is recorded in a format 

developed and maintained by State 

child welfare agencies. Case plans are 

periodically reviewed under the 

purview of State case review systems. 

In computing the number of burden 

hours for this information collection, 

ACF based the annual burden estimates 

on States’ experiences in developing 

case plans. 

Respondents: State title IV–B and title 

IV–E Agencies. 

ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES

Instrument Number of 

respondents 

Number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Average 

burden hours 

per response 

Total 

burden hours 

Case Plan ........................................................................................................ 638,735 1 4.0 2,554,940 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 2,554,940. 

Additional Information 

Copies of the proposed collection may 

be obtained by writing to the 

Administration for Children and 

Families, Office of Administration, 

Office of Information Services, 370 

L’Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, 

DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance 

Officer. All requests should be 

identified by the title of the information 

collection. E-mail address: 

infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. 

OMB Comment 

OMB is required to make a decision 

concerning the collection of information 

between 30 and 60 days after 

publication of this document in the 

Federal Register. Therefore, a comment 

is best assured of having its full effect 

if OMB receives it within 30 days of 

publication. Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

directly to the following: Office of 

Management and Budget, Paperwork 

Reduction Project, Fax: 202–395–6974, 

Attn: Desk Officer for the 

Administration for Children and 

Families. 

Dated: August 14, 2007. 

Robert Sargis, 

Reports Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 07–4045 Filed 8–17–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4184–01–M 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health 

Services Administration 

Notice of Meeting 

Pursuant to Public Law 92–463, 

notice is hereby given that the 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health 

Services Administration (SAMHSA) 

National Advisory Council will meet on 

September 10–11, 2007. 

The meeting is open to the public and 

will include presentations by SAMHSA 

staff and consumers on the following 

initiatives: The First Lady’s Initiative, 

‘‘Helping America’s Youth,’’ SAMHSA’s 

Role in Meeting the Physical and Mental 

Health Needs on Returning Veterans 

and their Families, SAMHSA’s Suicide 

Prevention Initiative and SAMHSA’s 

Workforce Development Activities. The 

agenda will also include a panel session 

where five recipients of SAMHSA’s first 

Science and Service Awards will 

discuss their experiences in 

implementing evidence-based practices 

in the fields of mental health treatment, 

mental health promotion, substance 

abuse treatment; substance abuse 

promotion, and co-occurring disorders. 

Attendance by the public will be 

limited to space available. Public 

comments are welcome. Please 

communicate with the SAMHSA 

National Advisory Council Executive 

Secretary, Toian Vaughn (see contact 

information below), to make 

arrangements to attend, to comment or 

to request special accommodations for 

persons with disabilities. 

Substantive program information, a 

summary of the meeting, and a roster of 

Council members may be obtained as 

soon as possible after the meeting, either 

by accessing the SAMHSA Committee 

Web site, http://www.nac.samhsa.gov, 

or by contacting Ms. Vaughn. The 

transcript for the meeting will also be 

available on the SAMHSA Committee 

Web site within three weeks after the 

meeting. 

Committee Name: SAMHSA National 

Advisory Council. 

Date/Time/Type: Monday, September 

10, 2007, from 9 a.m. to 4:15 p.m.: 

Open. Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 

from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.: Open. 

Place: 1 Choke Cherry Road, Sugarloaf 

and Seneca Conference Rooms, 

Rockville, Maryland 20857. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Toian Vaughn, Executive Secretary, 

SAMHSA National Advisory Council 

and SAMHSA Committee Management 

Officer, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 8–

1089, Rockville, Maryland 20857, 

Telephone: (240) 276–2307; FAX: (240) 

276–2220 and E-mail: 

toian.vaughn@samhsa.hhs.gov. 

Dated: August 7, 2007. 

Toian Vaughn, 

Committee Management Officer, Substance 

Abuse and Mental Health Services 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 07–4054 Filed 8–17–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4162–20–M 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Submission for OMB 

Review; Comment Request 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA) has 

submitted the following information 

collection to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) for review and 

clearance in accordance with the 

requirements of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. The submission 

describes the nature of the information 

collection, the categories of 

respondents, the estimated burden (i.e., 

the time, effort and resources used by 

respondents to respond) and cost, and 

includes the actual data collection 

instruments FEMA will use. Since 

publication of the 60 day proposed 

collection notice, 72 FR 26140, May 8, 

2007, the burden estimates have been 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES