### 57846 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 184 / Thursday, September 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-approved.Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ), the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056.

Related Information

(i) Refer to MCAI Israeli Airworthiness Directive 01–10–01–07R1, dated January 20, 2010, for related information. Material Incorporated by Reference

(j) None. Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 10, 2010. Jeffrey E. Duven, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–23741 Filed 9–22–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 39**

**[Docket No. FAA–2010–0632; Directorate Identifier 2010–CE–025–AD; Amendment**  **39–16426; AD 2010–18–12]**

**RIN 2120–AA64**

**Airworthiness Directives; Robert E. Rust, Jr. Model DeHavilland DH.C1**  **Chipmunk 21, DH.C1 Chipmunk 22, and DH.C1 Chipmunk 22A Airplanes** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Final rule; correction.

**SUMMARY :**  The FAA is correcting an airworthiness directive (AD) that published in the Federal Register . That AD applies to the products listed above. The AD number in the 14 CFR Part 39 section and the § 39.13 [Amended] section is incorrect. This document corrects that error. In all other respects, the original document remains the

same.

**DATES :**  This AD remains effective October 7, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is Document Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Carey O’Kelley, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337; telephone: (404) 474–5543; fax: (404) 474–5606; e-mail: carey.o’kelley@faa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Airworthiness Directive 2010–18–12, amendment 39–16426 (75 FR 53861, September 2, 2010), currently requires you to do a one-time inspection of the flap operating system for an unapproved latch plate design installation, with replacement as necessary for Robert E. Rust, Jr. Model DeHavilland DH.C1 Chipmunk 21, DH.C1 Chipmunk 22, and DH.C1 Chipmunk 22A airplanes.

As published, the AD number in the 14 CFR Part 39 section and § 39.13 [Amended] section is incorrect.

No other part of the preamble or regulatory information has been changed; therefore, only the changed portion of the final rule is being published in the Federal Register

.

The effective date of this AD remains October 7, 2010. Correction of Non-Regulatory Text

In the Federal Register of September 2, 2010, AD 2010–18–12; Amendment 39–16426 is corrected as follows:

On page 53861, in the 3rd column, on line 6 under 14 CFR Part 39, change ‘‘AD
2010–18–01 ’’ to ‘‘AD 2010–18–12. ’’

On page 53863, in the 1st column, on line 4 under § 39.13 [Amended], change

‘‘AD 2010–18–01 ’’ to ‘‘AD 2010–18–12. ’’

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 16, 2010. William J. Timberlake, Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–23745 Filed 9–22–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION** 

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71**

**[Docket No. FAA–2010–0777; Airspace Docket No. 10–ASO–29]** 
**Amendment of Class E Airspace; Brewton, AL** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Final rule, technical amendment.

**SUMMARY :**  This action amends Class E airspace at Brewton Municipal Airport, Brewton, AL, by updating the geographic coordinates of the airport to aid in the navigation of our National Airspace System.

**DATES :**  Effective date: 0901 UTC. October 25, 2010.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Melinda Giddens, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305–5610.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  History

The FAA received a request from the National Aeronautical Navigation Services (NANS) to update the geographic coordinates of Brewton Municipal Airport, Brewton, AL. This action makes the adjustment. Accordingly, since this is an administrative change, and does not involve a change in the dimensions or operating requirements of that airspace, notice and public procedures under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are unnecessary.

The Class E airspace designations are published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA order 7400.9U, dated August 18, 2010, and effective September 15, 2010, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in the Order.

The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them, operationally current, is non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a

‘‘ significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘ significant rule ’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated impact is