alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Consent of Independent Public Accountants

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the 
incorporation by reference of our report, dated January 29, 1997, 
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended 
December 31, 1996, into (i) Cinergy Corp.'s previously filed 
Registration Statement Nos. 33-55267, 33-55291, 33-55293, 33-
55713, 33-56067, 33-56089, 33-56091, 33-56093, 33-56095 and 333-
17531; (ii) PSI Energy, Inc.'s previously filed Registration 
Statement Nos. 33-48612, 33-57064 and 333-10899; (iii) The 
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company's previously filed Registration 
Statement Nos. 33-45116, 33-52335 and 33-58967; and (iv) The 
Union Light, Heat and Power Company's previously filed 
Registration Statement Nos. 33-40245 and 33-58965.



Arthur Andersen LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio,
March 27, 1997.
-----Original Message----- 

From: masterof47@yahoo.com [mailto:masterof47@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 12:20 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Brian Quiggle 

600 Kresge Ct # 452 

Santa Cruz, CA 95064
§ 236.587 Departure test. ( a ) The automatic train stop, train control, or cab signal apparatus on each locomotive, except a locomotive or a multiple-unit car equipped with mechanical trip stop, shall be tested using one of the following methods: ( 1 ) Operation over track elements;
( 2 ) Operation over test circuit;
( 3 ) Use of portable test equipment; or
( 4 ) Use of onboard test device.
( b ) The test shall be made on departure of the locomotive from its initial terminal unless that apparatus will be cut out between the initial terminal and the equipped territory. If the apparatus is cut out between the initial terminal and the equipped territory the test shall be made prior to entering equipped territory.
( c ) If a locomotive makes more than one trip in any 24-hour period, only one departure test is required in such 24-hour period.
( d ) ( 1 ) Whoever performs the test shall certify in writing that such test was properly performed. The certification and the test results shall be posted in the cab of the locomotive and a copy of the certification and test results left at the test location for filing in the office of the supervisory official having jurisdiction.
( 2 ) If it is impractical to leave a copy of the certification and test results at the location of the test, the test results shall be transmitted to either ( i ) the dispatcher or
( ii ) one other designated individual at each location, who shall keep a written record of the test results and the name of the person performing the test. These records shall be retained for at least 92 days.
[49 FR 3387, Jan. 26, 1984, as amended at 53 FR 37313, Sept. 26, 1988] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 49 FR 3387, Jan. 26, 1984, § 236.587 was revised. This section contains information collection and recordkeeping requirements and will not become effective until approval has been given by the Office of Management and Budget.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0562

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ROBERT EARL STAUDENMAYER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 23, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 18 2021

05/18/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0562
#### §§ 28.152-28.159 [Reserved]
#### § 29.922 May a party appeal a Civilian Board of Contract Appeals decision?

A party may appeal a decision of the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals within 120 days to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
§ 238.107 Inspection, testing, and maintenance plan. ( a ) *General.* Beginning on January 1, 2002, the following provisions of this section apply to railroads operating Tier I passenger equipment covered by this part. A railroad may request earlier application of these requirements upon written notification to FRA's Associate Administrator for Safety as provided in § 238.1(c).
( b ) Each railroad shall develop, and provide to FRA upon request, a detailed inspection, testing, and maintenance plan consistent with the requirements of this part. This plan shall include a detailed description of the following: ( 1 ) Inspection procedures, intervals, and criteria;
( 2 ) Test procedures and intervals;
( 3 ) Scheduled preventive maintenance intervals;
( 4 ) Maintenance procedures; and
( 5 ) Special testing equipment or measuring devices required to perform inspections and tests.
( c ) The inspection, testing, and maintenance plan required by this section is not intended to address and should not include procedures to address employee working conditions that arise in the course of conducting the inspections, tests, and maintenance set forth in the plan. When requesting a copy of the railroad's plan, FRA does not intend to review any portion of the plan that relates to employee working conditions.
( d ) The inspection, testing, and maintenance plan required by this section shall be reviewed by the railroad annually.
[64 FR 25660, May 12, 1999, as amended at 65 FR 41307, July 3, 2000]
§ 229.215 Retention and inspection of designs. ( a ) *Retention of records—original designs.* Each manufacturer or remanufacturer of a locomotive subject to this subpart shall retain all records of the original locomotive designs, including supporting calculations and drawings, pertaining to crashworthiness features required by this subpart. These records must be retained for the lesser period of: ( 1 ) The life of such locomotive, except that records for a locomotive destroyed in a rail equipment accident/incident shall be retained for at least 12 months following the accident/incident; or
( 2 ) Twenty years after the date of manufacture or, if remanufactured, twenty years after the date of remanufacture.
( b ) *Retention of records—repairs and modifications.* Each owner or lessee of a locomotive subject to this subpart shall retain all records of repair or modification to crashworthiness features required by this subpart. These records must be retained for the lesser period of: ( 1 ) The life of such locomotive, except that records for a locomotive destroyed in a rail equipment accident/incident shall be retained for at least 12 months following the accident/incident, or
( 2 ) Twenty years after the date on which the repair or modification was performed.
( c ) *Inspection of records.* Each custodian of records referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) shall, upon request by FRA or an FRA-certified State inspector, make available for inspection and duplication within 7 days, any records referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
( d ) *Third party storage of records.* Each custodian of records referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section may delegate storage duties to a third party; however, the custodian retains all responsibility for compliance with this section.
[71 FR 36914, June 28, 2006]
§ 245.305 Periods of ineligibility. ( a ) The starting date for a period of ineligibility described in this section shall be: ( 1 ) For a person not currently certified, the date of the railroad's written determination that the most recent incident has occurred; or
( 2 ) For a person currently certified, the date of the railroad's notification to the person that recertification has been denied or certification has been suspended.
( b ) A period of ineligibility shall be determined according to the following standards: ( 1 ) In the case of a single incident involving a violation of one or more of the operating rules or practices described in § 245.303(e)(1) through (6), the person shall have their certificate revoked for a period of 30 calendar days.
( 2 ) In the case of two separate incidents involving a violation of one or more of the operating rules or practices described in § 245.303(e)(1) through (6), that occurred within 24 months of each other, the person shall have their certificate revoked for a period of six months.
( 3 ) In the case of three separate incidents involving violations of one or more of the operating rules or practices, described in § 245.303(e)(1) through (7), that occurred within 36 months of each other, the person shall have their certificate revoked for a period of one year.
( 4 ) In the case of four separate incidents involving violations of one or more of the operating rules or practices, described in § 245.303(e)(1) through (7), that occurred within 36 months of each other, the person shall have their certificate revoked for a period of three years.
( 5 ) Where, based on the occurrence of violations described in § 245.303(e)(7), different periods of ineligibility may result under the provisions of this section and § 245.115, the longest period of revocation shall control.
( c ) Any or all periods of revocation provided in paragraph (b) of this section may consist of training.
( d ) A person whose certification is denied or revoked shall be eligible for grant or reinstatement of the certificate prior to the expiration of the initial period of ineligibility only if: ( 1 ) The denial or revocation of certification in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section is for a period of one year or less;
( 2 ) Certification is denied or revoked for reasons other than noncompliance with § 219.101 of this chapter;
( 3 ) The person is evaluated by a railroad officer and determined to have received adequate remedial training;
( 4 ) The person successfully completes any mandatory program of training or retraining, if that is determined to be necessary by the railroad prior to return to service; and
( 5 ) At least one half of the pertinent period of ineligibility specified in paragraph (b) of this section has elapsed.
§ 229.139 Sanitation, servicing requirements. ( a ) The sanitation compartment of each lead locomotive in use shall be sanitary.
( b ) All components required by § 229.137(a) for the lead locomotive in use shall be present consistent with the requirements of this part, and shall operate as intended such that: ( 1 ) All mechanical systems shall function;
( 2 ) Water shall be present in sufficient quantity to permit flushing;
( 3 ) For those systems that utilize chemicals for treatment, the chemical (chlorine or other comparable oxidizing agent) used to treat waste must be present; and
( 4 ) No blockage is present that prevents waste from evacuating the bowl.
( c ) The sanitation compartment of each occupied locomotive used in switching service pursuant to § 229.137(b)(1)(ii), in transfer service pursuant to § 229.137(b)(1)(iii), or in a trailing position when the locomotive is occupied, shall be sanitary.
( d ) Where the railroad uses a locomotive pursuant to § 229.137(e) in switching or transfer service with a defective toilet facility, such use shall not exceed 10 calendar days from the date on which the defective toilet facility became defective. The date on which the toilet facility becomes defective shall be entered on the daily inspection report.
( e ) Where it is determined that the modesty lock required by § 229.137(a)(2) is defective, the railroad shall repair the modesty lock on or before the next 92-day inspection required by this part.
[67 FR 16050, Apr. 4, 2002]
#### § 29.311 Is a subsequent funding agreement retroactive to the end of the term of the preceding funding agreement?

When the Department and a Tribe execute a subsequent funding agreement, the provisions of such a funding agreement are retroactive to the end of the term of the preceding funding agreement.
-----Original Message----- 

From: chris@aps4av.com [mailto:chris@aps4av.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:03 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Chris Caines 

2372 North Glassell Street 

Orange, CA 92865
II

Calendar No. 558

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2464

[Report No. 104–348]

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 15, 1996

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

AUGUST 1, 1996

Reported by Mr. MCCAIN, without amendment

AN ACT

To amend Public Law 103–93 to provide additional lands

within the State of Utah for the Goshute Indian Reservation, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADDITION OF CERTAIN UTAH STATE LANDS TO

4 GOSHUTE INDIAN RESERVATION.

5 The Utah Schools and Lands Improvement Act of

6 1993 (107 Stat. 995) is amended—

7 (1) by redesignating section 11 as section 12;

8 and
2

•HR 2464 RS

1 (2) by inserting after section 10 the following

2 new section:

3 ‘‘SEC. 11. ADDITIONAL GOSHUTE INDIAN RESERVATION

4 LANDS.

5 ‘‘(a) FURTHER ADDITIONS TO GOSHUTE RESERVA6 TION.—In addition to the lands described in section 3, for

7 the purpose of securing in trust for the Goshute Indian

8 Tribe certain additional public lands and lands belonging

9 to the State of Utah, which comprise approximately 8,000

10 acres of surface and subsurface estate, as generally de11 picted on the map entitled ‘Additional Utah-Goshute Ex12 change’, dated July 1, 1994, such public lands and State

13 lands are hereby declared to be part of the Goshute Indian

14 Reservation in the State of Utah effective upon the com15 pletion of conveyance of the State lands from the State

16 of Utah and acceptance of title by the United States.

17 ‘‘(b) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the Interior

18 is authorized to acquire through exchange those lands and

19 interests in land described in subsection (a) which are

20 owned by the State of Utah, subject to valid existing

21 rights.

22 ‘‘(c) APPLICATION OF PRIOR PROVISIONS.—(1) Ex23 cept as provided in paragraph (2), the remaining provi24 sions of this Act which are applicable to the lands to be
3

•HR 2464 RS

1 transferred to the Goshute Indian Tribe pursuant to sec2 tion 3 shall also apply to the lands subject to this section.

3 ‘‘(2) The Goshute Indian Tribe will be responsible for

4 payment of the costs of appraisal of the lands to be ac5 quired pursuant to this section, which costs shall be paid

6 prior to the transfer of such lands.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Calendar No. 558

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2464

[Report No. 104–348]

AN ACT

To amend Public Law 103–93 to provide additional

Indian Reservation, and for other purposes.lands within the State of Utah for the Goshute

AUGUST 1, 1996

Reported without amendment
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2418

To improve the capability to analyze deoxyribonucleic acid.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1995

Mr. MCCOLLUM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To improve the capability to analyze deoxyribonucleic acid.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DNA Identification

5 Grants Improvement Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. DNA IDENTIFICATION GRANTS.

7 Paragraph (22) of section 1001(a) of the Omnibus

8 Crime Control and Safe Streets Act is amended to read

9 as follows:

10 ‘‘(22) There are authorized to be appropriated

11 to carry out part X—

12 ‘‘(A) $1,000,000 for fiscal year 1996;
2

•HR 2418 IH

1 ‘‘(B) $15,000,000 for fiscal year 1997;

2 ‘‘(C) $14,000,000 for fiscal year 1998;

3 ‘‘(D) $6,000,000 for fiscal year 1999; and

4 ‘‘(E) $4,000,000 for fiscal year 2000.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 826 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 826

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a shorter 
 recovery period for the depreciation of certain restaurant buildings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2001

Mr. Foley (for himself, Mr. Watkins, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Pickering, Ms. Dunn, 
  Mr. Shows, and Mr. Stump) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a shorter 
 recovery period for the depreciation of certain restaurant buildings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECOVERY PERIOD FOR DEPRECIATION OF RESTAURANT BUILDINGS.

    (a) 15-Year Recovery Period.--Subparagraph (E) of section 168(e)(3) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 15-year property) is 
amended by striking ``and'' at the end of clause (ii), by striking the 
period at the end of clause (iii) and inserting ``, and'', and by 
adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(iv) any section 1250 property which is a 
                        retail restaurant facility.''
    (b) Retail Restaurant Facility.--Subsection (e) of section 168 of 
such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(6) Retail restaurant facility.--The term `retail 
        restaurant facility' means any building if more than 50 percent 
        of the building's square footage is devoted to preparation of, 
        and seating for on-premises consumption of, prepared meals.''
    (c) Alternative System.--The table contained in section 
168(g)(3)(B) of such Code is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to subparagraph (E)(iii) the following new item:

``(E)(iv)...................................................      20''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to retail restaurant buildings placed in service after the date 
of the enactment of this Act and to all improvements made after the 
date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 234

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make nondischargeable

a debt for death or injury caused by the debtor’s operation of watercraft

or aircraft while intoxicated.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. EHLERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make

nondischargeable a debt for death or injury caused by

the debtor’s operation of watercraft or aircraft while

intoxicated.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Boating and Aviation

5 Operation Safety Act of 1994’’.
2

HR 234 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

2 Section 523(a)(9) of title 11, United States Code, is

3 amended by inserting ‘‘, watercraft, or aircraft’’ after

4 ‘‘motor vehicle’’.

5 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.

6 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub7 section (b), this Act and the amendment made by section

8 2 shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this

9 Act.

10 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—The amendment

11 made by section 2 shall not apply with respect to cases

12 commenced under title 11 of the United States Code be13 fore the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
-----Original Message----- 

From: delucamail@yahoo.com [mailto:delucamail@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:05 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sandra DeLuca 

23-22 28th street 

Astoria, NY 11105