Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 173 / Friday, September 7, 2007 / Proposed Rules 51391 

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on 

August 30, 2007. 

Thomas A. Boudreau, 

Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E7–17682 Filed 9–6–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2006–28778; Airspace 

Docket No. 07–AGL–6] 

Proposed Establishment of Class E5 

Airspace; Prairie Du Sac, WI 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

establish Class E airspace at Prairie Du 

Sac, WI. Additional controlled airspace 

is necessary to accommodate aircraft 

using a new Area Navigation (RNAV) 

Global Positioning System (GPS) 

Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP) at 

Sauk-Prairie Airport. The FAA is 

proposing this action to enhance the 

safety and management of aircraft 

operations at Sauk-Prairie Airport, 

Prairie Du Sac, WI. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before October 1, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the Docket Management 

System, U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M–

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. You must 

identify the docket number FAA–2007–

28778/Airspace Docket No. 07–AGL–6, 

at the beginning of your comments. You 

may also submit comments on the 

Internet at http://dms.dot.gov You may 

review the public docket containing the 

proposal, any comments received, and 

any final disposition in person in the 

Dockets Office between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The Docket Office 

(telephone 1–800–647–5527) is on the 

ground floor of the building at the above 

address. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Grant Nichols, System Support, DOT 

Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 

Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, 

Kansas City, MO 64106; at telephone 

number (816) 329–2522. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposal rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments, as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket umbers and be submitted in 

triplicate to the address listed above. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this notice must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to 

Docket No. FAA–2007–28778/Airspace 

Docket No. 07–AGL–6.’’ The postcard 

will be date/time stamped and returned 

to the commenter. 

Availability of NPRM’s 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

internet at http://dms.dot.gov. Recently 

published rulemaking documents can 

also be accessed through the FAA’s Web 

page at http://www.faa.gov or the 

Superintendent of Document’s Web 

page at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara. 

Additionally, any person may obtain 

a copy of this notice by submitting a 

request to the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Office of Air 

Traffic Airspace Management, ATA–

400, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20591, or by calling 

(202) 267–8783. Communications must 

identify both docket numbers for this 

notice. Persons interested in being 

placed on a mailing list for future copies 

of NPRMs should contact the FAA’s 

Office of Rulemaking (202) 267–9677, to 

request a copy of Advisory Circular No. 

11–2A, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

Distribution System, which describes 

the application procedure. 

The Proposal 

This action proposes to amend Title 

14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 

CFR) part 71, by establishing Class E 

airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface at Sauk-Prairie 

Airport, Prairie Du Sac, WI. aAnew 

RNAV (GPS) IAP has made this action 

necessary for the safety of IFR 

operations at Sauk-Prairie Airport, 

Prairie Du Sac, WI. This area would be 

depicted on appropriate aeronautical 

charts. 

Class E airspace areas extending 

upward from 700 feet or more above the 

surface of the earth are published in 

Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9P, 

dated September 1, 2006, and effective 

September 15, 2006, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designations 

listed in this document would be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. It, 

therefore, (1) Is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under Executive 

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant 

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies 

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant 

preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation 

as the anticipated impact is so minimal. 

Since this is a routine matter that will 

only affect air traffic procedures and air 

navigation, it is certified that this rule, 

when promulgated, will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (Air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND 

CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; 

AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING 

POINTS 

1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9P, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated September 1, 2006, and effective 

September 15, 2006, is amended as 

follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 

AGL E5 Prairie Du Sac, WI [New] 

Sauk-Prairie Airport, Prairie Du Sac, WI 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
51392 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 173 / Friday, September 7, 2007 / Proposed Rules 

(Lat. 43°17′52′′ N., long. 89°45′21′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius 

of Sauk-Prairie Airport, Prairie Du Sac, WI. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on July 31, 2007. 

Donald R. Smith, 

Manager, System Support Group, ATO 

Central Service Area. 

[FR Doc. 07–4285 Filed 9–06–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 60 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2002–0071; FRL–8448–8] 

RIN 2060–A009 

Update of Continuous Instrumental 

Test Methods: Technical Amendments 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing ‘‘Update of 

Continuous Instrumental Test Methods: 

Technical Amendments’’ to correct 

errors in a recent final rule that 

amended five instrumental test methods 

and was published on May 15, 2006. As 

published, the amendments contained 

inadvertent errors and provisions that 

need to be clarified. We are correcting 

errors and clarifying portions of the 

amendments to reflect the intent of the 

rule and to make them more 

understandable by affected parties. 

In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’

section of this Federal Register, we are 

correcting errors and making 

clarifications as a direct final rule 

without a prior proposed rule. If we 

receive no adverse comment, we will 

not take further action on this proposed 

rule. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received by October 9, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–

OAR–2002–0071, by mail to Update of 

Continuous Instrumental Test Methods, 

Environmental Protection Agency, Mail 

Code 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., 

NW., Washington, D.C. Please include a 

total of 2 copies. Comments may also be 

submitted electronically or through 

hand delivery/courier by following the 

detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES

section of the direct final rule located in 

the rules section of the Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Foston Curtis, Air Quality and Analysis 

Division, Office of Air Quality Planning 

and Standards (D143–02), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 

27711; telephone number (919) 541–

1063; fax number (919) 541–0516; 

e-mail address curtis.foston@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Why Is EPA Issuing This Proposed 

Rule? 

This document proposes to take 

action on ‘‘Update of Continuous 

Instrumental Test Methods: Technical 

Amendments.’’ We have published a 

direct final rule to correct and clarify 

updates to test methods in the ‘‘Rules 

and Regulations’’ section of this Federal 

Register because we view this as a 

noncontroversial action and anticipate 

no adverse comment. We have 

explained our reasons for this action in 

the preamble to the direct final rule. 

If we receive no adverse comment, we 

will not take further action on this 

proposed rule. If we receive adverse 

comment, we will withdraw the direct 

final rule and it will not take effect. We 

would address all public comments in 

any subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. 

We do not intend to institute a second 

comment period on this action. Any 

parties interested in commenting must 

do so at this time. For further 

information, please see the information 

provided in the ADDRESSES section of 

this document. 

II. Does This Action Apply to Me? 

This rule applies to sources that are 

subject to the New Source Performance 

Standards, Clean Air Markets 

requirements, and other regulations that 

require the use of Methods 3A, 6C, 7E, 

10, and 20 of appendices A–1, A–4, and 

A–7 to 40 CFR part 60. 

Regulated Entities. Categories and 

entities potentially regulated include 

the following: 

Examples of regulated 

entities 

SIC 

codes 

NAICS 

codes 

Fossil Fuel Steam Generators ....................... 3569 332410 

Industrial, Commercial, 

Institutional Steam 

Generating Units ....... 3569 332410 

Electric Generating 

Units .......................... 3569 332410 

Stationary Gas Turbines 3511 333611 

Petroleum Refineries .... 2911 324110 

Municipal Waste Combustors ...................... 4953 562213 

Kraft Pulp Mills ............. 2621 322110 

Sulfuric Acid Plants ...... 2819 325188 

III. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review 

This action is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under the terms of 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and is therefore not 

subject to review under the Executive 

Order. 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

This action does not impose an 

information collection burden under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 

Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. These 

amendments do not add information 

collection requirements beyond those 

currently required under the applicable 

regulation. The amendments being 

made to the test methods do not add 

information collection requirements but 

make needed corrections to existing 

testing methodology. 

Burden means the total time, effort, or 

financial resources expended by persons 

to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose 

or provide information to or for a 

Federal agency. This includes the time 

needed to review instructions; develop, 

acquire, install, and utilize technology 

and systems for the purposes of 

collecting, validating, and verifying 

information, processing and 

maintaining information, and disclosing 

and providing information; adjust the 

existing ways to comply with any 

previously applicable instructions and 

requirements; train personnel to be able 

to respond to a collection of 

information; search data sources; 

complete and review the collection of 

information; and transmit or otherwise 

disclose the information. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. The OMB control 

number for EPA’s regulations in 40 CFR 

are listed in 40 CFR part 9. 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) 

generally requires an agency to prepare 

a regulatory flexibility analysis of any 

rule subject to notice and comment 

rulemaking requirements under the 

Administrative Procedure Act or any 

other statute unless the agency certifies 

that the rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. Small entities 

include small businesses, small 

organizations, and small governmental 

jurisdictions. 

For purposes of assessing the impacts 

of today’s rule on small entities, small 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS