alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). LA / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M ARCO DU RAN- RAM I RE Z, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E RJ r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 73458 A ge nc yN o. A 077- 356- 995 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J anuary11, 2010 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T R O T T , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M ar c o D ur an- R a m i r e z , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons pr o s e f or r e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to re op en proceedi ng s. W e have j uri sdi ct i on pu rs uantt o 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew 

# FI LED JAN 19 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSL A/ Res ea r ch 07- 73458 2 f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , Si ng h v. G on zales , 491 F . 3 d1 0 9 0 , 1 0 9 5 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 7 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A a c te dw ith in its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g D u r an - R am ir e z ’s m o tio n to re op en as un t i m el y bec ause i tw as no tfi l ed w i thi n 9 0 d ay s of the B IA ’ s f i nal d e c is io n o n h is u n d e r ly in g ap p e a l, se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (2), and D uran-R am i re z f a ile dto e s tab lis h th a t h e a c te dw ith th e du e d ilig e n c e r e qu ir e df o re qu itab le to llin g , s e e Si ngh , 491 F . 3d a t1096- 97. PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW D EN I ED .
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 27, 1995 (121), Para 121.35 Leave of Absence]
[Page 1458]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.121.35  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--
  To Mr. VOLKMER, for today and balance of the week; and
  To Mr. TUCKER, for today and balance of the week.
  And then,
```
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Mitchell D. Staples, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Bancorporation of Alabama, Inc.(the “Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report basedon such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting;5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit
25

 
committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: August 13, 2005    /s/ Mitchell D. Staples     Mitchell D. Staples  Principal Accounting Officer
26
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 164 (Friday, August 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 48680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4146]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, 
Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 25, 2007, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Network Centric Operations 
Industry Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, BT Ltd., Diegem, BELGIUM; and SRA 
International, Fairfax, VA have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Network Centric Operations Industry 
Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications 
disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 19, 2004, Network Centric Operations Industry 
Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the 
Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 2, 
2005 (70 FR 5486).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 18, 
2007. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on July 13, 2007 (72 FR 38618).

J. Robert Kramer, II,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-4146 Filed 8-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)**

**OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PaulsonCapital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Chester L. F. Paulson, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.
| /s/ Chester L. F. Paulson             |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Chester L. F. Paulson                 |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Paulson Capital Corp.                 |
| November 20, 2006                     |

 

This certification is made solely for the purpose of18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PaulsonCapital Corp. and will be retained by Paulson Capital Corp. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         124,953
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             451
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    231,529
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         609,320
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           607,697
<LOANS>                                      1,466,318
<ALLOWANCE>                                     23,524
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,596,895
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,790,644
<SHORT-TERM>                                   383,796
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             41,635
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       380,820
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,596,895
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 35,204
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               14,226
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   182
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                49,612
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,986
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,167
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           32,445
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      900
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 188
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,720
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,340
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      18,340
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,002
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.52
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,889
<LOANS-PAST>                                     6,161
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   177
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                23,002
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,230
<RECOVERIES>                                       852
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               23,524
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: jb04120710@yahoo.com [mailto:jb04120710@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 11:56 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 30, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jennie Alkhalafat 

187 Pearson Rd 

Dale, TX 78616
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2366 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2366

     To repeal an unnecessary medical device reporting requirement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 19, 1995

 Mrs. Vucanovich (for herself and Mr. Waxman) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition 
  to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To repeal an unnecessary medical device reporting requirement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL.

    Section 1862 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y) is 
amended by striking subsection (h).
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: SOON WHA CHEY; DAVID

CHEY,

 Debtors,

SOON WHA CHEY; DAVID CHEY,

 Appellants,

 v.

AMRANE COHEN; et al.,

 Appellees.

No. 10-60029

BAP No. 09-1254

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

Pappas, Montali, and Brandt, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted January 21, 2015** 

Before: CANBY, GOULD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Soon Wha Chey and her son, David Chey, appeal pro se from the

FILED

FEB 3 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s

order granting Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s motion for relief from an automatic stay

with respect to certain real property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 158(d). We review de novo BAP decisions, and apply the same standard of

review that the BAP applied to the bankruptcy court’s ruling. Boyajian v. New

Falls Corp. (In re Boyajian), 564 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir. 2009). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion by granting relief from the

automatic bankruptcy stay to Wells Fargo because the Cheys no longer had a legal

or equitable interest in the subject property. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1) (allowing

bankruptcy court to grant relief from the stay for cause); Christensen v. Tucson

Estates, Inc. (In re Tucson Estates, Inc.), 912 F.2d 1162, 1166 (9th Cir. 1990)

(cause for lifting the stay may exist where a state court proceeding involving the

same issues is pending).

The Cheys’ requests for judicial notice, set forth in their opening brief, are

denied.

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

2 10-60029
Docket: IRS-2009-0008 

Request for Information for Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 

2008 

Comment On: IRS-2009-0008-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: IRS-2009-0008-0072 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-09629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Andrea Joy Sime 

Address: 

Lincoln, NE, 

Organization: First Step Wellness Center 

General Comment 

As a Clinical Social Worker who provides EEG biofeedback training to clients with 

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), anxiety, depression, sleep and 

pain disorders, I strongly urge parity with mental health and substance abuse 

disorders on an equal footing with medical/surgical procedures. There are over 50 

published studies on the effectiveness of EEG biofeedback training on various 

mental health conditions and medical conditions with far fewer (if any) serious sideeffects or negative consequences which frequently can occur with 

medical/surgical/pharmacological interventions. Furthermore, evidence-based 

criteria for mental health techniques are more restrictive than for medical/surgical. 

This is not parity. The parity statute should require the same equal access to 

mental health and substance abuse procedures as with medical/surgical. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 28, 2009 

Tracking No. 809b92da 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009
§ 230.34 Riveted repairs and alterations. ( a ) *Alterations to unstayed portions of the boiler.* Prior to making riveted alterations on unstayed portions of the boiler, the steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall submit a written request for approval to the FRA Regional Administrator. If approval is granted, the steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall perform any riveting to unstayed portions of the boiler in accordance with established railroad practices or an accepted national standard for boiler repairs. The steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall satisfy reporting requirements in § 230.20 at this time.
( b ) *Repairs to unstayed portions of the boiler.* The steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall perform any riveted repairs to unstayed portions of the boiler in accordance with established railroad practices, or an accepted national standard for boiler repairs. The steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall satisfy reporting requirements in § 230.20 at this time.
( c ) *Repairs to stayed portions of the boiler.* The steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall perform riveted repairs or alterations on stayed portions of the boiler in accordance with established railroad practices or an accepted national standard for boiler repairs. The steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall satisfy reporting requirements in § 230.20 at this time.
§ 180.603 Qualification of portable tanks. ( a ) Each portable tank used for the transportation of hazardous materials must be an authorized packaging.
( b ) To qualify as an authorized packaging, each portable tank must conform to the requirements of this subchapter and the applicable design specification to which the portable tank was constructed.
( c ) The following portable tanks are authorized for use provided they conform to all applicable safety requirements of this subchapter: 51, 56, 57, 60, IM 101, IM 102 and UN portable tanks.
( d ) A portable tank that also meets the definition of “container” in 49 CFR 450.3(a)(3) must conform to the requirements in parts 450 through 453 of this title for compliance with Annex II of the Convention for Safe Containers (CSC).
( e ) *Exemption portable tanks based on DOT 51 portable tanks.* The owner of a portable tank constructed in accordance with and used under an exemption issued prior to August 31, 1996, which was in conformance with the requirements for Specification DOT 51 portable tanks with the exception of the location of fill and discharge outlets, shall examine the portable tank and its design to determine if it meets the outlet requirements in effect on October 1, 1996. If the owner determines that the portable tank is in compliance with all requirements of the DOT 51 specification, the exemption number stenciled on the portable tank shall be removed and the specification plate (or a plate placed adjacent to the specification plate) shall be durably marked “DOT 51-E*****” (where ***** is to be replaced by the exemption number). During the period the portable tank is in service, and for one year thereafter, the owner of the portable tank must retain on file, at its principal place of business, a copy of the last exemption in effect.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





**Certification
      Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.** § **1350)**




The
      undersigned, as the chief financial officer of PAB Bankshares, Inc., certifies,
      to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
      period ended March 31, 2006, which accompanies this certification fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PAB
      Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing
      certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other
      purpose.





Dated
      this 10th day of May, 2006.




*/s/ Donald J. Torbert, Jr.*Donald
                J. Torbert, Jr.Executive
                Vice President and Chief Financial
                Officer







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      PAB Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by PAB Bankshares, Inc. and furnished
      to the SEC or its staff upon request.
§ 230.36 Hydrostatic testing of boilers. ( a ) *Time of test.* The locomotive owner and/or operator shall hydrostatically test every boiler at the following times: ( 1 ) During the 1472 service day inspection, and at every annual inspection thereafter;
( 2 ) After making any alteration to the boiler;
( 3 ) After installing a flush patch on an unstayed portion of the boiler; and
( 4 ) After any riveting on an unstayed portion of the boiler.
( b ) *Method of testing.* The metal temperature of the boiler shall be between 70 degrees Fahrenheit and 120 degrees Fahrenheit each time it is subjected to any hydrostatic pressure. Hydrostatic testing required by these rules shall be conducted at 25 percent above the MAWP.
( c ) *Internal inspection.* An internal inspection of the boiler shall be conducted following any hydrostatic test where the pressure exceeds MAWP.
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2262

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 19, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building located

at 218 North Alston Street in Foley, Alabama, as the

‘‘Holk Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2262 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States Post Office building located at 218

3 North Alston Street in Foley, Alabama, shall be known

4 and designated as the ‘‘Holk Post Office Building’’.

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

8 States Post Office building referred to in section 1 shall

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Holk Post Office

10 Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 19,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By LINDA NAVE,

Deputy Clerk.
#### § 236.71 Signal wires on pole line and aerial cable.

Signal wire on pole line shall be securely tied in on insulator properly fastened to crossarm or bracket supported by pole or other support. Signal wire shall not interfere with, or be interfered by, other wires on the pole line. Aerial cable shall be supported by messenger.

[49 FR 3384, Jan. 26, 1984]