51466 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 173 / Friday, September 7, 2007 / Notices 

of Decision. Second, if and when BLM 

acquires certain property, described as 

approximately 5,514 acres at Coast 

Dairies in Santa Cruz County, 

management decisions for this property 

will be outlined in a separate Record of 

Decision (ROD). 

The Approved RMP expands the 

existing 43,357 acre Panoche-Coalinga 

Area of Critical Environmental Concern 

(ACEC) to include an additional 12,772 

acres, and designates two new ACECs 

(21,980 acres) and one Research Natural 

Area (RNA) for a total of 78,109 acres of 

special designations, which is 

approximately 3 percent of the planning 

area. The new ACECs include all BLM 

public lands at the former Fort Ord and 

7,327 acres of BLM public lands 

surrounding Joaquin Rocks. The 

Monvero Dunes RNA (1,173 acres) is 

contained within the Panoche-Coalinga 

ACEC expansion. 

The following types of resource use 

limitations would generally apply to 

these ACECs: (1) Motorized travel 

would be limited to designated routes; 

(2) limits on land disposal; and (3) 

limits on new mineral development 

(mineral leasing, locatable minerals and 

wind energy) to protect unique cultural 

values and special status plants and 

animals. For detailed information, see 

Chapter 3 and Appendix D of the ROD 

for the Hollister RMP for the Southern 

Diablo Mountain Range and Central 

Coast of California. 

The Governor of the State of 

California in his letter dated September 

15, 2006 stated, ‘‘Pursuant to 43 CFR 

1603–2, and after consulting with 

affected State and Local agencies, the 

Governor’s Office of Planning and 

Research (OPR) has not found any 

inconsistencies with any state or local 

plans, policies, or programs with 

regards to this [Proposed] Resource 

Management Plan.’’

The decisions identifying designated 

routes of travel for motorized vehicles 

are implementation decisions and are 

appealable under 43 CFR Part 4. These 

decisions are contained on Figures 17–

21 in Appendix A of the RMP. Any 

party adversely affected by the decisions 

identifying designated routes may 

appeal within 30 days of publication of 

this Notice of Availability. The appeal 

should state the specific route(s), as 

identified in Appendix A of the RMP, 

on which the decision is being 

appealed. The appeal must be filed with 

the Hollister Field Manager at the above 

listed address. 

Please consult the appropriate 

regulations (43 CFR Part 4, Subpart E) 

for further appeal requirements. Before 

including your address, phone number, 

e-mail address, or other personal 

identifying information in your appeal, 

you should be aware that your entire 

appeal—including your personal 

identifying information—may be made 

publicly available at any time. While 

you can ask us in your appeal to 

withhold your personal information 

from public review, we cannot 

guarantee that we will be able to do so. 

Dated: July 26, 2007. 

Rick Cooper, 

Hollister Field Office Manager. 

[FR Doc. E7–17718 Filed 9–6–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–40–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response 

Compensation and Liability Act 

Pursuant to 28 CFR 507 notice is 

hereby given that on August 16, 2007, 

a proposed Consent Decree in the Case 

United States v. Gwen Campbell Trust 

1995 et al., Civil Action No. 07–05350 

GHK (FFMx), was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

Central District of California. 

In this action, under Sections 106 and 

107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 

9607, the United States sought 

injunctive relief and recovery of 

response costs to remedy conditions in 

connection with the release or 

threatened release of hazardous 

substances into the environment at the 

Waste Disposal, Inc. Superfund Site in 

Santa Fe Springs, California (hereinafter 

referred to as the ‘‘Site’’ or ‘‘WDI Site.’’

The defendants in this action own a 

portion of the WDI Site, and the purpose 

of the settlement is to provide to the 

United States the access and 

institutional controls or environmental 

restriction covenants which are required 

to perform the remedial action at the 

Site. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the proposed Consent Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 

P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–

7611, and should refer to United States 

v. Gwen Campbell Trust 1995 et al., D.J. 

Ref. 90–11–2–1000/4. 

The proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined at U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 

94107. During the public comment 

period, the Consent Decree, may also be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site, http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html. 

A copy of the proposed Consent 

Decree may also be obtained by mail 

from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. 

Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611, or by 

faxing Tonia Fleetwood at fax no. (202) 

514–0097 (phone confirmation number 

(202) 514–1547) or by e-mailing Tonia 

Fleetwood at 

tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov. In 

requesting a copy of the Consent Decree 

from the Consent Decree Library, please 

enclose a check in the amount $69.50 

(25 cents per page reproduction cost × 

278 pages) payable to the U.S. Treasury. 

In requesting a copy of the Consent 

Decree, exclusive of exhibits, please 

enclose a check in the amount of $15.25 

(25 cents per page reproduction cost × 

61 pages) payable to the U.S. Treasury. 

Henry S. Friedman 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section. 

[FR Doc. 07–4359 Filed 9–6–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[AAG/A Order No. 029–2007] 

Privacy Act of 1974; System of 

Records 

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Justice. 

ACTION: Modification to Systems of 

Records. 

SUMMARY: This notice serves to remove 

a specific routine use from certain 

Department of Justice (DOJ) Privacy Act 

systems of records notices. On January 

31, 2001, at 66 FR 8425–32, the 

following routine use language was 

added to all DOJ Privacy Act notices 

published prior to that date, in 

accordance with a DOJ regulation 

published at 28 CFR 16.300–01. 

[Disclosure ] ‘‘To a former employee 

of the Department for purposes of: 

Responding to an official inquiry by a 

federal, state, or local government entity 

or professional licensing authority, in 

accordance with applicable Department 

regulations; or facilitating 

communications with a former 

employee that may be necessary for 

personnel-related or other official 

purposes where the Department requires 

information and/or consultation 

assistance from the former employee 

regarding a matter within that person’s 

former area of responsibility.’’

This routine use is hereby deleted 

from the following Privacy Act Systems 

of Records Notices included in the 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES