alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      10.143

    


    March
      22,
      2006

    


    Don
      Meiners

    401
      Full
      Moon Way

    Danville,
      CA 94506

    


    Re: Amendment
      to Severance Agreement

    


    Dear
      Don:

    


    You
      and
      Wave Wireless Corporation (the “Company”) are parties to a Severance Agreement
      dated November 3, 2004, a copy of which is attached hereto (the “Agreement”).
      This letter agreement supercedes the Agreement. Upon execution of this
      Agreement, the Agreement shall terminate and be of no force and effect.


    


    In
      the
      event of your termination from the Company for any reason at any time after
      the
      closing of the merger with Wave Rider Communications, Inc., you will receive
      three (3) month’s severance. In addition, the Company will pay your COBRA for a
      period of six (6) months following your termination. 

    


    In
      the
      event you’re employment with the Company is terminated involuntarily, your
      shares of restricted common stock shall vest 100%. In the event your employment
      is voluntarily terminated, your restricted stock shall continue to vest for
      a
      period of six (6) months following the date of termination.

    


    If
      you
      agree that this letter accurately sets forth our agreement as to the matters
      set
      forth herein, please indicate your acceptance by signing in the space set forth
      below, and returning a copy hereof to Company.

    
      	 	 	Sincerely,
	 	 	 
	 	 	WAVE WIRELESS CORPORATION
	 	 
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	 	 	/s/ Daniel
              W.
              Rumsey
	 	
              
Daniel
              W. Rumsey
	 	 


    

     

    ACCEPTED
      AND AGREED TO

    AS
      OF THE
      DATE HEREOF:

     

    /s/
      Don Meiners

    Don
      Meiners
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2415

To designate the United States Customs Administrative Building at the

Ysleta/Zaragosa Port of Entry located at 797 South Ysleta in El Paso,

Texas, as the ‘‘Timothy C. McCaghren Customs Administrative Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1995

Mr. COLEMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To designate the United States Customs Administrative

Building at the Ysleta/Zaragosa Port of Entry located

at 797 South Ysleta in El Paso, Texas, as the ‘‘Timothy

C. McCaghren Customs Administrative Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States Customs Administrative Building

5 at the Ysleta/Zaragosa Port of Entry located at 797 South

6 Ysleta in El Paso, Texas, shall be known and designated

7 as the ‘‘Timothy C. McCaghren Customs Administrative

8 Building’’.
2

•HR 2415 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

5 to the ‘‘Timothy C. McCaghren Customs Administrative

6 Building’’.

Æ
#### In the Matter of Charles Oster.

Order reversed, motion granted, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to abide event.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 878 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 878

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the exclusion 
      from gross income for damage awards for emotional distress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2001

  Mr. Frank introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the exclusion 
      from gross income for damage awards for emotional distress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR DAMAGE AWARDS 
              FOR EMOTIONAL DISTRESS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 104 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to compensation for injuries or 
sickness) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``physical'' each place it appears in 
        paragraph (2), and
            (2) by striking the last 2 sentences and inserting the 
        following new sentence: ``For purposes of paragraph (2), the 
        term `personal injuries or sickness' includes emotional 
        distress.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to amounts received after December 31, 2000, in taxable years 
ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
### Re: OIRA has concluded EO 12866 review of Reconsideration of the 2008 Ozone NAAQS Lydia Wegman to: King, Heidi R. 01/06/2010 11:09 AM Cc: "Mancini, Dominic J.", John Hannon, Karen Martin, Kathy Kaufman, Ron Evans, Susan Stone, Thomas Gillis, Tricia Crabtree 

### Thank you very much Heidi. We appreciate your and Dom's help in getting the rule cleared in a timely manner. "King, Heidi R." 01/06/2010 10:00:26 AM Thank you all for your work on this rule. OIRA h... From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi

_ R.

_ King@omb.eop.gov> To: Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic

_ J.

_ Mancini@omb.eop.gov>, John Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Susan Stone/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 01/06/2010 10:00 AM Subject: OIRA has concluded EO 12866 review of Reconsideration of the 2008 Ozone NAAQS


### Thank you all for your work on this rule. OIRA has concluded review under EO 12866. Best regards, Heidi
From: Mark Howard [mailto:markmillie@verizon.net] 

Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 7:12 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: We want to manage our own retirement accounts - RIN 1210-AB32

The subject line states our needs succinctly. I don't want the government anywhere near our life savings, 

especially this administration!

Incredibly arrogant hubris on display with this regulatory grab.

No! No! No!

Mark & Mildred Howard

4007 N. 3rd Cir

Ridgefield, WA 98642
From: Kristi Tarver [mailto:kristi.tarver@mohrpartners.com] 

Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 1:21 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Input on MHPAEA 

I wanted to take a moment to provide input on this new Act. Our insurance carrier stated you 

were seeking input on the following: 

1. Types of financial requirements or treatment limits plans currently impose. – 

Pays the same for inpatient/outpatient as does for any other illness, EXCEPT it 

limits the number of visits per year to 45 visits for inpatient and 60 visits for 

outpatient

2. What policies, procedures, or practices of group health plans and health 

insurance issuers may

be impacted by MHPAEA? I believe that once the insurer has to pay the same as 

any other illness, they will begin to limit the coverage they provide for other 

illnesses. What direct or indirect costs would result? Loss of coverage to the 

insured, or higher rate increases. What direct or indirect benefits would result? 

The benefit would be that coverage limits are increased for mental illness which 

is long over-due. Which stakeholders will be impacted by such benefits and 

costs? Again, I think policyholders and employers will ultimately loose coverage 

in other areas and/or increase rates at a higher than normal pace or more than 

likely both. 

3. Are there additional paperwork burdens related to MHPAEA compared to those 

related to Mental Health Parity Act of 1996, and, if so, what estimated hours and 

costs are associated with those additional burdens? As the employer, no. The 

burden would fall on the insurer. And as history has told us, additional 

administrative burdens and increased coverage will be ultimately passed on to 

the insured and employers who contribute to their employee’s premium.

Bottom line for me, the coverage for mental health is long over-due. However, it will create a 

financial burden through increased rates or loss of other coverages. 

Wish that there could be mandates on these concerns. Wish we had better mental health 

providers available. Not only has the coverage been lacking, but the mental health providers are 

sorely lacking in their approach to treatment and a lot of fraud has occurred in this industry. 

Hoping this Act will somehow help that. 

Thank you for your time and consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Kristi Tarver

Executive Administrative Assistant/

HR Specialist
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Quantex Capital Corporation - Exhibit 10.16






QUANTEX CAPITAL CORPORATION

CONTRACT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES

THIS AGREEMENT made the 1st day of September, 2005.

BETWEEN:

QUANTEX CAPITAL CORPORATION a
company duly 
incorporated pursuant to the laws of Nevada, USA, having an

office at #205, 4840 Delta Street, Delta, BC, Canada V4K 2T6

(collectively herein referred to
“Quantex”)

AND:

Mountainscape Management Services
Ltd., with the address at 5290 Oak Place, 
Ladner, BC V4K 1L9

(“Mountainscape”)

WHEREAS:

(A)                  
Quantex, formerly known as Beddis International Ltd., engaged Mountainscape as a
contractor of Quantex.

(B)                  
Mountainscape has subsequently accepted another contract position and will not
be able to provide as much time and services to Quantex.

The previous Agreement dated February 1, 2005 between the
parties shall remain in effect except as follows:

1.                    
The Compensation referred to in paragraph 6. shall be reduced from $80,000 per
annum to $60,000.

2.                    
The term of this Agreement shall be extend to terminate on August 31, 2006.

3.                    
Quantex hereby acknowledges and authorizes Mountainscape to fulfill its
consulting contract with Maxxcapp Corporation. Quantex stipulates that this
contract will not violate paragraph 11 of the original contract.

All other terms and conditions of the original agreement
shall remain unchanged.




- 2 -

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this
Agreement.

	Signed on behalf of 	 
	QUANTEX CAPITAL CORPORATION 	 
	by: 	 
	  	 
	  	 
	/s/ Matt Reams	 
	Matt Reams 	 
	  	 
	  	 
	Signed, Sealed and Delivered by 	 
	MOUNTAINSCAPE MANAGEMENT 	 
	SERVICES LTD. in the presence of: 	 
	  	 
	  	 
	  	 
	/s/ L. Evan Baergen	 
	L. Evan Baergen, Mountainscape Management Services Ltd.	 
	  	 
	5290 Oak Place, Ladner, BC,
      Canada 	 
	Address
[Belknap,

June, 1882.]

#### Brown *& a. v.*Prescott *& a.*

*Pike*Parsons, for Wilkinson and Eastman.

*Barnard £*Barnard, for the plaintiffs.

Demurrer to a bill in equity to compel specific performance of a parol agreement to convey land by the defendant Prescott, while solvent, and to restrain the other defendants, creditors of Prescott, from levying upon the land. It was held that the bill might be maintained in favor of the plaintiff Mary A. Brown, upon proof of the allegations of an agreement with her to convey the land, if she and her husband, John W., would move upon *the land and carry it on; and that they moved upon the premises and have resided there since November, 1869, and have made extensive repairs and improvements upon the same, relying upon Prescott’s promise to convey; and the other defendants have knowledge that the plaintiffs relied upon that promise.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
### 'LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA CEMENT September 30, 2010

Mr. Robert G. Sliwinski, P,E. Director, Bureau ofAir Quality Planning New York State Department ofEnvironmental Conservation 625 Broadway Albany, NY 12233-3251 Re: LafargeRavenaPlant, NYSDECID#4012400001 BART Analysis

DearMr. Sliwinski: This purpose ofthis letter is to provide a status summary ofthe Lafarge Ravena Plant with respect to the applicability ofa BART analysis for the facility. Based on previous discussions with the Department, the Lafarge Ravena Plant submits this letter in lieu ofthe BART analysis required by October 1,2010. The two long wet kilns atthe Ravena Planthave been operating since 1962, and are the BART eligible units. As you may know, Lafarge entered into a Consent Decree with EPA, Case 3: 10-cv-000440JPG-CJP, which contains a compliance schedule for the Ravena Plantto either; modernize the existing plant, retrofitthe existing kilns with NOx and S02 controls, or retire the kilns. Additionally, Condition 92, Item 92.2 ofthe Ravena Plant's currentTitle V Permit contains a similarcompliance schedule. Both Condition 92 and the Ravena-specific pages for NOxand S02 compliance from the EPA Consent Decree are shown as attachments. The Ravena Planthas submitted the necessary applications to the Department for the proposed PlantModernization Project (DEIS, Title V permitmodification and SPDES permit modification). This project will result in replacement ofthe two existing long wet kilns with one short dry kiln and pre-heaterpre-calcinertower. The target completion date for the project is during 2014. We agree with the Department's position that the consent decree requiring the modernization in the near future obviates the need for a BART analysis. The approximate timeframe for the modernization coincides with the compliance date for BART, and it would be counterproductive to require a BART analysis in light ofthe impending upgrades. The consent decree terms and permit condition are expected to suffice for the BART determinationto be sentto EPA.

U.s. East Business Unit PO Box 3, Ravena, NY 12143 Office: (518)756-5026 Fax: (518)756-9333 www.lafargenorthamerica.comIfyou have any questions orrequire additional information, please contact me at (518) 756-5026.

F. Reagan vironmental Manager Copy: S. Griffin, NYSDEC D. Spencer, NYSDEC Region 4 B. Voshell, Lafarge Attachments

U.s. East Business Unit PO Box 3, Ravena, NY 12143 Office: (518) 756-5026 Fax: (518) 756-9333 www.lafargenorthamerica.com
§ 238.425 Electrical system. ( a ) *Circuit protection.* ( 1 ) The main propulsion power line shall be protected with a lightning arrestor, automatic circuit breaker, and overload relay. The lightning arrestor shall be run by the most direct path possible to ground with a connection to ground of not less than No. 6 AWG. These overload protection devices shall be housed in an enclosure designed specifically for that purpose with the arc chute vented directly to outside air.
( 2 ) Head end power, including trainline power distribution, shall be provided with both overload and ground fault protection.
( 3 ) Circuits used for purposes other than propelling the equipment shall be connected to their power source through circuit breakers or equivalent current-limiting devices.
( 4 ) Each auxiliary circuit shall be provided with a circuit breaker located as near as practical to the point of connection to the source of power for that circuit; however, such protection may be omitted from circuits controlling safety-critical devices.
( b ) *Main battery system.* ( 1 ) The main batteries shall be isolated from the cab and passenger seating areas by a non-combustible barrier.
( 2 ) Battery chargers shall be designed to protect against overcharging.
( 3 ) Battery circuits shall include an emergency battery cut-off switch to completely disconnect the energy stored in the batteries from the load.
( 4 ) If batteries are of the type to potentially vent explosive gases, the batteries shall be adequately ventilated to prevent accumulation of explosive concentrations of these gases.
( c ) *Power dissipation resistors.* ( 1 ) Power dissipating resistors shall be adequately ventilated to prevent overheating under worst-case operating conditions.
( 2 ) Power dissipation grids shall be designed and installed with sufficient isolation to prevent combustion between resistor elements and combustible material.
( 3 ) Power dissipation resistor circuits shall incorporate warning or protective devices for low ventilation air flow, over-temperature, and short circuit failures.
( 4 ) Resistor elements shall be electrically insulated from resistor frames, and the frames shall be electrically insulated from the supports that hold them.
( d ) *Electromagnetic interference and compatibility.* ( 1 ) The operating railroad shall ensure electromagnetic compatibility of the safety-critical equipment systems with their environment. Electromagnetic compatibility can be achieved through equipment design or changes to the operating environment.
( 2 ) The electronic equipment shall not produce electrical noise that interferes with trainline control and communications or with wayside signaling systems.
( 3 ) To contain electromagnetic interference emissions, suppression of transients shall be at the source wherever possible.
( 4 ) Electrical and electronic systems of equipment shall be capable of operation in the presence of external electromagnetic noise sources.
( 5 ) All electronic equipment shall be self-protected from damage or improper operation, or both, due to high voltage transients and long-term over-voltage or under-voltage conditions.
-----Original Message----- 

From: rschoedler@earthlink.net [mailto:rschoedler@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:19 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Randolph Schoedler 

3709 W Michigan St 

Milwaukee, WI 53208
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, November 6, 1995 (140), Para 140.11 Additional Sponsors]
[Pages 1873-1874]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.140.11  additional sponsors

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were added to public bills and 
resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 44: Mr. Weldon of Florida.
       H.R. 632: Mr. Bryant of Texas.
       H.R. 773: Mr. Bishop.
       H.R. 1046: Mr. Evans, Mr. Foglietta, Mr. Clement, and Mrs. 
     Lowey.
       H.R. 1834: Mrs. Cubin and Mr. Lucas.
       H.R. 1971: Mr. Schumer.
       H.R. 2008: Mr. Waxman.

[[Page 1874]]

       H.R. 2463: Mr. Owens.
       H.R. 2535: Mr. Stump.
       H.R. 2551: Mr. Jefferson.

```
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/18/15 9:49 PM

Received: July 15, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k01-yk5t

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2369

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Deborah Tangen

General Comment

I have a Master's Degree in Education, therefore, I can and will plan for my OWN retirement! I 

have worked very hard to raise a family by myself without a government handout, let alone 

needing/wanting government interference in how I do so!!! With the poor way that the 

government runs the finances of our country, I sure do NOT want them meddling in my personal 

finances and retirement savings when they have no business, let alone have NO RIGHT to do so!
#### § 236.301 Where signals shall be provided.

Signals shall be provided to govern train movements into and through interlocking limits, except that a signal shall not be required to govern movements over a hand-operated switch into interlocking limits if the switch is provided with an electric lock and a derail at the clearance point, either pipe-connected to the switch or independently locked, electrically. Electric locks installed under this rule must conform to the time and approach locking requirements of Rule 314 (without reference to the 20-mile exceptions), and those of either Rule 760 or Rule 768, as may be appropriate.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee was established by Public Law 98-181, November 30, 1983, to advise the Export-Import Bank on its programs and to provide comments for inclusion in the reports of the Export-Import Bank on its programs and to provide comments for inclusion in the reports of the Export-Import Bank of the United States to Congress.

*Time and Place:*                         Wednesday, September 19, 2007 from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in the Main Conference Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.                    

*Agenda:*                         Agenda items include a short summary of the Bank's recent activities, plus presentations from the Finance & Government Team and the Labor & Agriculture Team of the 2007 Advisory Committee members.                    

*Public Participation:*                         The meeting will be open to public participation, and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral questions or comments. Members of the public may also file written statement(s) before or after the meeting. If you plan to attend, a photo ID must be presented at the guard's desk as part of the clearance process into the building, and you may contact Teri Stumpf to be                               ( print page 49009)                            placed on an attendee list. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (such as a sign language interpreter) or other special accommodations, please contact, prior to September 5, 2007, Teri Stumpf, Room 1209, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, Voice: (202) 565-3502 or TDD (202) 565-3377.                    

*Further Information:*                         For further information, contact Teri Stumpf, Room 1209, 811 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3502.                    

Howard A. Schweitzer, 

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 07-4154 Filed 8-24-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M