alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: nk9sboo@aol.com [mailto:nk9sboo@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:12 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. I also support any restrictions that can be placed on the 

evil thievery that these "Death Panels" get away with every day, 

insurance companies are crooked evil companies who only care about 

their bottom line! Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Michael Harding 

Buck Creek 

Big Sur, CA 93920
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RON G. VOSS, ) No. 12-56168

 )

Plaintiff - Appellant, ) D.C. No. 3:11-cv-00842-H-KSC

)

v. ) MEMORANDUM*

)

JERRY E. KNOTTS; ELECTRONIC )

ARTS, INC., a Delaware corporation, )

DBA EA Sports; PROCTER & )

GAMBLE MANUFACTURING CO.;)

VIACOM INC., a Delaware )

corporation; VIACOM )

INTERNATIONAL INC., )

a Delaware corporation, )

)

Defendants - Appellees. )

 )

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 8, 2014**

Pasadena, California

FILED

APR 22 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral

argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Before: FERNANDEZ, N.R. SMITH, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Ron G. Voss appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Jerry

E. Knotts, Electronic Arts, Inc., Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co., Viacom

Inc., and Viacom International Inc. (collectively “Knotts”) on the basis that Voss

lacked standing to pursue the action. We affirm.

The district court did not err when it determined that because Voss had not

listed his alleged copyright in his bankruptcy schedules, ownership of the asset1

remained in the bankruptcy estate2 and he lacked standing to pursue this action.3

Only the trustee of the bankruptcy estate would have standing. See 11 U.S.C.

§ 323(b); Estate of Spirtos v. Superior Court Case, 443 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir.

2006). 

There is no basis to substitute the trustee in bankruptcy for Voss now, on

appeal. Voss is not disabled from pursuing his appeal, and he has done so. See

Fed. R. App. P. 43(b); Sable Commc’ns of Cal., Inc. v. Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co., 890

1

See Range Rd. Music, Inc. v. E. Coast Foods, Inc., 668 F.3d 1148, 1153

(9th Cir. 2012).

2

See Cusano v. Klein, 264 F.3d 936, 945–46 (9th Cir. 2001); Stein v. United

Artists Corp., 691 F.2d 885, 893 (9th Cir. 1982); see also Rousey v. Jacoway, 544

U.S. 320, 325, 125 S. Ct. 1561, 1565, 161 L. Ed. 2d 563 (2005).

3

See Cusano, 264 F.3d at 945; Diamond Z Trailer, Inc. v. JZ, L.L.C. (In re

JZ, L.L.C.), 371 B.R. 412, 418 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2007).

2
F.2d 184, 191 n.13 (9th Cir. 1989). Moreover, a substitution of parties would not

change the fact that the district court did not err. We deny the motion to substitute.

AFFIRMED; motion DENIED.

3
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0620 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Inger Carlson 

Address: 

7480 Woodmont 

NAvarre, FL, 32566 

Email: ingersandvik@yahoo.com 

General Comment 

“On behalf of NAMI Emerald Coast, I am writing to submit comments on the Interim Final Rules 

under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 

2008 and in doing so NAMI Emerald Coast endorses the separate comments submitted by the 

Parity Implementation Coalition and the National Alliance on Mental Illness”. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: April 30, 2010 

Received: April 29, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ae3e18 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 4/30/2010
#### David Phillips, Respondent, v. Francis M. Brown, Appellant.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered; costs to abide event. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
-----Original Message----- 

From: heather@mcmeekan.net [mailto:heather@mcmeekan.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 9:45 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Heather McMeekan 

263 Jana Rd 

Macomb, IL 61455
From: jbabicka@optinline.net [mailto:jbabicka@optinline.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:53 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jaromir Babicka 

360 Island Creek Drive 

Vero Beach, FL 32963
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,177,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,177,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,177,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,919
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        500
<COMMON>                                    11,339,714
<OTHER-SE>                                (10,172,133)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,177,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 17, 1995 (129), Para 129.22 After Recess--5:00 P.M.]
[Page 1531]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.129.22  after recess--5:00 p.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. RIGGS, called the House to order.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: annmt1949@aol.com [mailto:annmt1949@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:20 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ann Carlson 

2847 Law Ave 

Boise, ID 83706
Exhibit 10.22


    Exhibit
      10.22

     

     

    AMENDMENT
      TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

    


    


    AMENDMENT
      NO. 1
      dated as
      of June 30, 2001 between BERRY
      PLASTICS CORPORATION,
      a
      Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), and
      RANDALL J. HOBSON (the
      "Executive").

     

    


    Reference
      is made to the Employment Agreement dated as of October 4, 1996 (the "Employment
      Agreement"), between the Corporation and the Executive. The Corporation and
      the
      Executive desire to extend the term of the Employment Agreement. All capitalized
      terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed
      to
      such terms in the Employment Agreement.

     

    Accordingly,
      in consideration of the mutual covenants and premises contained herein and
      other
      good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
      acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

     

    1.  Term.
      Section
      2 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
      follows:

     

    "Subject
      to earlier termination as provided herein, the employment of the Executive
      hereunder shall commence on October 4, 1996 (the “Effective
      Date”),
      and
      terminate on June 30, 2006 (the “Expiration
      Date”).
      Such
      period of employment is hereinafter referred to as the “Employment
      Period.”

     

    2.  Termination
      of Employment.
      Section
      8(b) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by adding a new paragraph
      (iii) which reads in its entirety as follows:

     

    “(iii)
      the applicable bonus provided for in Section 5(b) computed on a pro-rata basis
      to the Termination Date, payable at the same time and in the same manner only
      as, if and when bonuses are paid to other employees of the Corporation of
      comparable seniority.”

     

    3.  Effect
      of Amendment.
      Except
      as expressly amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full
      force
      and effect and unchanged.

     

    4.  Counterparts.
      This
      Amendment No. 1 may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which
      shall
      be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the
      same instrument.

     

    *
      * * *
      *

     

    


     

    


     

    


     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF,
      the
      parties have hereunto set their hands as of the date first written
      above.

     

    BERRY
      PLASTICS CORPORATION

    


    


    By:     
      /s/ Ira G. Boots

    Ira
      G.
      Boots

    President
      and Chief Executive Officer

    


    


            
       /s/ Randall J. Hobson

    Randall
      J. Hobson
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, October 11, 1995 (126), Para 126.26 Leave of Absence]
[Page 1505]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.126.26  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted to Mr. TEJEDA, for 
today and the balance of the week.
  And then,
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAnalysis and mitigation of numerical dissipation in inviscid and viscid computation of vortex-dominated flowsThe conservative unsteady Euler equations for the flow relative motion in the moving frame of reference are used to solve for the steady and unsteady flows around sharp-edged delta wings. The resulting equations are solved by using an implicit approximately-factored finite volume scheme. Implicit second-order and explicit second- and fourth-order dissipations are added to the scheme. The boundary conditions are explicitly satisfied. The grid is generated by locally using a modified Joukowski transformation in cross flow planes at the grid chord stations. The computational applications cover a steady flow around a delta wing whose results serve as the initial conditions for the unsteady flow around a pitching delta wing about a large angle of attack. The steady results are compared with the experimental data and the periodic solution is achieved within the third cycle of oscillation.Document ID19900016965Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsKandil, Osama A.*(Old Dominion Univ. Norfolk, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1990Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186887NASA-CR-186887Accession Number90N26281Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-846Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016965.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 213.357 Derails. ( a ) Each track, other than a main track, which connects with a Class 7, 8 or 9 main track shall be equipped with a functioning derail of the correct size and type, unless railroad equipment on the track, because of grade characteristics cannot move to foul the main track.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, a derail is a device which will physically stop or divert movement of railroad rolling stock or other railroad on-track equipment past the location of the device.
( c ) Each derail shall be clearly visible. When in a locked position, a derail shall be free of any lost motion which would prevent it from performing its intended function.
( d ) Each derail shall be maintained to function as intended.
( e ) Each derail shall be properly installed for the rail to which it is applied.
( f ) If a track protected by a derail is occupied by standing railroad rolling stock, the derail shall be in derailing position.
( g ) Each derail on a track which is connected to a Class 7, 8 or 9 main track shall be interconnected with the signal system.
#### Harlow C. Curtiss, Respondent, *v.*William T. Jebb, Appellant.

Reported below, 137 App. Div. 928.

(Argued November 14, 1910;

decided November 22, 1910.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 16, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover back money paid.

The motion was made upon the ground that the judgment of the Appellate Division was unanimous and the exceptions frivolous.

*James McC. Mitchell*for motion.

*Charles B. Sears*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
-----Original Message----- 

From: kamiaustin@cox.net [mailto:kamiaustin@cox.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 1:04 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kami Austin 

4165 W. Orchid Ln. 

Chandler, AZ 85226
§ 214.517 Retrofitting of existing on-track roadway maintenance machines manufactured on or after January 1, 1991. In addition to meeting the requirements of § 214.513, after March 28, 2005 each existing on-track roadway maintenance machine manufactured on or after January 1, 1991, shall have the following: ( a ) A change-of-direction alarm or rearview mirror or other rearward viewing device, if either device is feasible, given the machine's design, and if either device adds operational safety value, given the machine's function. In any action brought by FRA to enforce this requirement, the employer shall have the burden of proving that neither device is feasible or adds operational safety value, or both, given the machine's design or work function.
( b ) An operative heater, when the machine is operated at an ambient temperature less than 50 degrees Fahrenheit and is equipped with, or has been equipped with, a heater installed by the manufacturer or the railroad.
( c ) The light weight of the machine stenciled or otherwise clearly displayed on the machine, if the light weight is known.
( d ) Reflective material, or a reflective device, or operable brake lights.
( e ) Safety glass when its glass is normally replaced, except that replacement glass that is specifically intended for on-track roadway maintenance machines and is in the employer's inventory as of September 26, 2003 may be utilized until exhausted.
( f ) A turntable restraint device, on machines equipped with a turntable, to prevent undesired lowering, or a warning light indicating that the turntable is not in the normal travel position.
[68 FR 44407, July 28, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 8839, Feb. 26, 2004]
#### Moses S. Herman and Simon M. Herman, *Appellants, v.*Albert B. Doughty and others, *Respondents*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Brady, J.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Cirino Cosme

, * From the 2 9 th District Court

of Palo Pinto County,

Trial Court No. 17575

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 3

- 00 011

- CR * September 19 , 20 2 4

The State of Texas

, * Memorand um Opinion by Williams , J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment s below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment s of the trial court are in all things affirmed.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of; May 211,20W 

Tracking No. 809acf39 

Docket: 1RS-2009-0008 

Rcqucst for Information for Paul Wellstone and Pctc Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addict ion Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: lRS.~009-0008-000 1 

Request for [nformation Regarding thc Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mcntal Health Parity 

and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: IRS-20Q~790S-0009 

Comment 01.1 FR Doc # E9-09629 

Submitter Information 

Namc: Jessica Marit: Eure 

Address: 

C'hmrlottesville, VA. 

Organization: Virginia Center for Neurofcdback, Attachment & Trauma 

General Comment 

Comments regarding Regulatory Guidance USCG-2007-27022 

pagc 19157,ll El specific areas 1 and 4 

I am a mental health counselor who provides EEG biofeedback treatment to 

individuals with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disnrder and Mood Disorders. 

EEG biofeedback is an empirically validatcd and widely recngnized effective 

non-mdication treatment for ADHD, as well as isther conditions. There are over 

50 studies evaluating the effectiveness of EEG biofeedback in dlc treatment of 

ADHD. Substame Use disorders and Autism. A recent review of this littraturc 

concluded "EEG biofedback mects the American Academy of Child and Adoksccnt 

Psych intty criteria for" Clinical Guidelines "for treatment of ADHD. " This means 

that EEG bio fccdback meets the same criteria as medication for treati~g A DHT), 

and that EEG biofeedback "should always be considered as an intervmtion for 

this disorder by the clinician". 

This service has been denied by Guorgia Medicaid, Aetna, United Behavioral 

Henlth, Blue Cross, Cigna, and Amerigroup. 

This is limitation of an effective and validaid treatment for a mental health 

problem. The reasons given by the irlsurarlce companies for this denial fell inlo 

two catesories: 1) our company does not cover biofeedback for Mmtal Hcalth 

prnblerns or 2) there is not yet sufficient cvidence for the efficacy of EEG 
Page 2 of 2 

biofeedback. As such, they are using evidence-based critcria that mt far more 

restrictive for mental hcalth sewices than the criteria which are used for 

mcdicwl/surgical semi ces. There art: many routinc medical and surgical 

procedures which have far fewer controlled studies about thcir cfficacy than 

does EEG bio feedba~k. Thcsc nlcdical and surgical procedures art: generally not 

limited because of concans about how many contrnlled studies have bem 

pdomad about them. 

We believe that the parity regulntions, based on legal reviews uf thc parity 

shtute should require that employers and plans pay for the same range and scopc 

of services for Behavioral Treatments as they do for Med Surg benefits and that 

a plan cannot be more wtrictive in their managed carc criteria and reviews for 

MH and SA disurders whcn compared to Med Surg. Today plans arc: being more 

restrictive in how they revicw cvidalced-based Mental EIealth and Substance Abuse 

Treatments when compared to Mcd Surg treotrnents. This violates both the intcnt 

and lctter of the parity statute and we hope that thc regulations will clarify 

that this can't continue.
-----Original Message----- 

From: mgarofalo2@optonline.net [mailto:mgarofalo2@optonline.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:32 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Monica Garofalo 

160 Overlook Ave. Apt. 24A 

Hackensack, NJ 07601
----

**FORM 10-QSB/A
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington D.C.  20549

Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15 (d)Of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For Quarter Ended                                                          June 30, 2001

Commission File Number                                                        2-79056**