alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: lonerider46@att.net [mailto:lonerider46@att.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:55 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

ruben naria 

2712 dawson st. 

dallas, TX 75226
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         138,370
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,047
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    261,236
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         561,685
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           563,203
<LOANS>                                      1,340,026
<ALLOWANCE>                                     20,605
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,463,312
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,778,110
<SHORT-TERM>                                   312,186
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             30,560
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       342,456
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,463,312
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 97,879
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               42,450
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   193
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               140,522
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              37,661
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,833
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           88,689
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   (2,100)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              (3,832)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 68,673 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,097
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      30,296
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,296
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.80
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,806
<LOANS-PAST>                                     4,852
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   196
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                19,226
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,554
<RECOVERIES>                                     6,033
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               20,605
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0 
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
#### Elias Heyman, Appellant, v. The Merchants’ National Bank of Syracuse, Respondent.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.
###### Editorial Note on Part 193

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

#### §§ 193.2403-193.2439 [Reserved]
#### James Wilson v. The State.

*No. 597.*

*Decided January 16.*

Aggravated Assault and Battery—Deadly Weapon.—On a prosecution for aggravated assault and battery committed with a knife, where there is no proof as to the size and character of the knife, except that defendant said that it was “his knife,” and the physician who examined the wounds testified that they were not dangerous, and “the wounds looked like they had been made by a penknife,” *Held,*the evidence was not sufficient; the question whether a knife is a deadly weapon or not depends upon its size or manner of its use.

Appeal from the County Court of Lamar. Tried below before Hon. John W. Rountree, County Judge;

This appeal is from a conviction for aggravated assault and battery, the punishment being assessed at a fine of $25.

The opinion sufficiently states the facts.

*65
      *G. W. Allen,*for appellant.

Ho briefs in the record for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The information charges appellant with an. aggravated assault and battery, by cutting Buckner with a knife—a deadly weapon—and by inflicting upon him serious bodily injury. Buckner testified, that defendant “ cut me three times in the back. I was laid up with cuts four or five days. I bled some at the mouth.” The attending physician testified: “I waited on Alf Buckner at the time he was cut by defendant. I waited on him some four or five days. He had three cuts in the back. I did not consider them serious. The cuts looked like they were made with a penknife. I do not think the cuts could have caused any bleeding at the mouth.” Defendant’s wife testified, that Buckner, at her home, in the house, was holding her by the hand, against her wish and over her protests, making improper proposals to her, when her husband broke the door “and run in and began to cut Alfred.” Defendant testified, that on reaching his house he heard the conversation between Buckner and his wife, “got out my knife, and pushed against the door and broke it open, and cut him till he run out in the yard.” As to the character of the knife—whether it was a deadly weapon or not—there is no evidence, and the physician’s testimony is, that the wounds were not considered by him as serious. Halsell v. The State, 29 Texas Crim. App., 22; George v. The State, 21 Texas Crim. App., 315. Whether a weapon is deadly or not will depend upon its size, or manner of its use. Willson Crim. Stats., sec. 844. The size of the knife is not shown, and there is no proof in this respect, except by defendant, that it was his knife. That the wounds looked as if they were made by penknife is not evidence that the knife was in fact a penknife. Melton v. The State, 30 Texas Crim. App., 273; Jenkins v. The State, 30 Texas Crim. App., 379.

Because the evidence does not sustain the conviction, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*

Judges all present and concurring.
2006 Board Compensation Summary



 Exhibit 10.27a 
 Hot Topic Inc., Director Compensation 2006 
 On March 17, 2006, our Board of Directors,
following approval of our Compensation Committee, established the following 2006 director compensation: 
 Cash Compensation: 
  

							
	 MEETINGS
	  	 NO. OF
MEETINGS
 (FY 2005)
	  	PER MTG.
FEE
(FY 2006)	 
	 Board
	  	4	  			
	 Chair
	  		  	$	7,000	 
	 Member
	  		  	$	5,000	 
			
	 Audit Committee
	  	6	  			
	 Chair
	  		  	$	2,500	 (+$10,000/Qtr.)
	 Member
	  		  	$	1,500	 
			
	 Governance & Nominating Committee
	  	4	  			
	 Chair
	  		  	$	2,500	 
	 Member
	  		  	$	1,000	 
			
	 Compensation Committee
	  	3	  			
	 Chair
	  		  	$	2,500	 
	 Member
	  		  	$	1,000	 

 Other Compensation: 
 Automatic Options: 
  

			
	 New Director Grant (0 in FY 2005):
	  	10,000 options
	 Continuing Director Grant (5 in FY 2005):
	  	2,500 options
	 Continuing Chair Grant (1 in FY 2005):
	  	3,750 options

 Discretionary Options: 
 Continuing Director Grant (5 in FY 2005): The number of shares which will, including the automatic grant, provide a $60,000 aggregate grant, using the Black Scholes model. 
 Continuing Chair Grant (1 in FY 2005): The number of shares which will, including the automatic grant, provide an $80,000 aggregate grant, using the
Black Scholes model. 
 Stock Bonus Award: 
 Director Award (5 in FY 2005): The number of shares equal to $25,000 divided by the share price determined as of the date of grant. 
 Chair Award (1 in FY 2005): The number of shares equal to $30,000 divided by the share price determined as of the date of grant.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 **Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.**§ **1350)**
 
 The undersigned, as the chief executive officer of PAB Bankshares, Inc., certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PAB Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.
 
 Dated this 9th day of August, 2004.
 
 ***/s/ Michael E. Ricketson***Michael E. Ricketson
President and Chief Executive Officer  - 26 -
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in each Registration Statement
of CLARCOR Inc. on Form S-8 (file numbers 33-5456, 33-38590, 33-39374, 33-53763
and 33-53899) of our reports dated January 9, 1998, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of CLARCOR Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
November 30, 1997 and 1996 and for the years ended November 30, 1997, 1996 and
1995, and the financial statement schedule for the years ended November 30,
1997, 1996, and 1995, which reports are included or incorporated by reference in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
                                         COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 
Chicago, Illinois
February 18, 1998
§ 230.93 Pistons and piston rods. ( a ) *Maintenance and testing.* Pistons and piston rods shall be maintained in safe and suitable condition for service. Piston rods shall be inspected for cracks each time they are removed, and shall be renewed if found defective.
( b ) *Fasteners.* Fasteners (keys, nuts, etc.) shall be kept tight and shall have some means to prevent them from loosening or falling out of place.
-----Original Message----- 

From: pharris49@sbcglobal.net [mailto:pharris49@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 9:36 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. We all know some good people who need this 

help. 

Sincerely, 

Paul Harris 

6704 Rustling Oaks Trail 

Austin, TX 78759
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-1290

___________ Troy Lawson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Correctional Medical Services; * Dottie Yarbrough; Reed, Warden, * [UNPUBLISHED] Arkansas Department of Correction; * Grant Harris, Warden, Arkansas * Department of Correction; Dr. Dotson; * Dr. Quimosing; Ms. Willis; Max * Mobley; Larry Norris, Director, * Arkansas Department of Correction; * George Wilson; Mr. Miles; Latasha * Woods, originally sued as Ms. Woods; * Dr. Robert Scott, originally sued as * Dr. Scott; Candace Church, originally * sued as Ms. Church; Thurman Green, * originally sued as Mr. Green; Brenda * Bearden, originally sued as Ms. * Bearden; Dr. Linda Collins, originally * sued as Dr. Collins, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 10, 2008 Filed: March 13, 2008

___________1 The Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., Un ited States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

2 Lawson has waived his other claims by not raising and addressing them on appeal. See K.D. v. County of Crow Wing , 434 F.3d 1051, 1055 n.4 (8th Cir. 2006).

-2- Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Arkansas inmate Troy Lawson appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he claimed inadequate treatment of HIV by Correctional Medical Services (CMS) personnel. 2Having carefully reviewedthe record, see Johnson v. Blaukat , 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006), we conclude that summary judgment was proper. While the record showed that prescribed antiviral medications we re occasionally not given, Lawson failed to rebut evidence that his HIV status had not worsened, and he offered no evidence showing that the named CMS defendants were the ones who administered medications or that the missed doses were deliberately withheld without appropriate reasons. See Estelle v. Gamble , 429 U.S. 97, 105-06 (1976) (inadvert ent failure to provide medical care does not amount to wanton and unnecessary infliction of pain); Laughlin v. Schriro , 430 F.3d 927, 929 (8th Cir. 2005) (obj ective seriousness of delay must be measured by reference to eff ect of delay, which must be shown by verifying medical evidence). Even gross neg ligence is an insufficient ba sis for an Eighth Amendment claim. See Alberson v. Norris , 458 F.3d 762, 765 (8th Cir. 2006).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Lawson’s motion for appointment of counsel.

_________________________________
1

Muldoon, Albert (OST)

From: Muldoon, Albert (OST)

Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 12:37 PM

To: 'jwaters@developcarlsbad.org'; 'svmccutcheon@cityofcarlsbadnm.com'; 

'schandler@cityofcarlsbadnm.com'; 'dale.janway@cityofcarlsbadnm.com'

Cc: Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); Harvey, Caitlin (OST); Readinger, Patricia (OST); Shawn 

Simpson <shawn@boutiqueair.com> (shawn@boutiqueair.com)

Subject: EAS at Carlsbad, NM - Request for Comments - Due February 25, 2015

Attachments: Boutique - Carlsbad, NM (CNM) Bid.pdf

All:  

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Carlsbad, New Mexico, and give you

an opportunity to submit comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant

Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.  In anticipation of the expiration of the current EAS contract,

the Department issued Order 2014‐12‐11 (December 16, 2014) requesting proposals from carriers interested

in providing EAS at Carlsbad.  In response to our request, the Department received one proposal, from

Boutique Air.

I have attached a copy of the proposal to this email for your review.  The proposal will also soon be available

online through the Federal Dockets Management System at www.regulations.gov by searching for docket:

DOT‐OST‐2002‐12802.

Please carefully review the proposal and submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, but no later

than February 25, 2015.  Please send your comments via email to EAS@dot.gov.  Feel free to contact me if you

have any questions and please forward this email to any relevant parties not included on this email.   

Regards,

A.J.

A.J. Muldoon

Office of Aviation Analysis

U.S. Department of Transportation

albert.muldoon@dot.gov

(202) 366‐1058
MOVESRunIDiterationID yearID monthID dayID hourIDstateID countyID zoneIDlinkIDpollutantID

1 1 2016 7 5 45 45091 87

1 1 2016 7 5 45 45091 79

1 1 2016 7 5 45 45091 3

1 1 2016 7 5 45 45091 1
pollutant desc processIDsourceTypeID fuelTypeID modelYearID roadTypeID SCC emissionQuant emissionQuantMean emissionQuantSigma

VOC 2367.27

non-methane hydrocarbons 2390.01

Nox 5919.19

total gaseous hyrdrocarbons 2611.49
§ 234.109 Recordkeeping. ( a ) Each railroad shall keep records pertaining to compliance with this subpart. Records may be kept on forms provided by the railroad or by electronic means. Each railroad shall keep the following information for each credible report of warning system malfunction: ( 1 ) Location of crossing (by highway name and DOT/AAR Crossing Inventory Number);
( 2 ) Time and date of receipt by railroad of report of malfunction;
( 3 ) Actions taken by railroad prior to repair and reactivation of repaired system; and
( 4 ) Time and date of repair.
( b ) Each railroad shall retain for at least one year (from the latest date of railroad activity in response to a credible report of malfunction) all records referred to in paragraph (a) of this section. Records required to be kept shall be made available to FRA as provided by 49 U.S.C. 20107 (formerly 208 of the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970 (45 U.S.C. 437)).
-----Original Message----- 

From: gpiers@mac.com [mailto:gpiers@mac.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 12:36 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

gary pierson 

126 I St. S.E. 

auburn, WA 98002
-----Original Message----- 

From: pat33cake@yahoo.com [mailto:pat33cake@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:15 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

patricia kusaba 

18419 burin ave 

redondo beach, CA 90278
#### § 236.767 Locking, route.

Electric locking, effective when a train passes a signal displaying an aspect for it to proceed, which prevents the movement of any switch, movable-point frog, or derail in advance of the train within the route entered. It may be so arranged that as a train clears a track section of the route, the locking affecting that section is released.
#### Hilliar Jackson v. The State.

*No. 1055.*

*Decided December 12.*

Murder—Indictment—Allegation of Weapon or Means Used.—An indictment for murder which fails to allege the means used or weapon with which the homicide was committed, is fatally insufficient and defective.

Appeal from District Court of Hill. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Hall.

This appeal is from a conviction for murder of the second degree, the punishment being assessed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of twenty-four years.

Omitting formal allegations, the indictment charged, “that one H. Jackson, in the county of Hill, aforesaid, on or about the twenty-third day of July, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and ninety-three, with force and arms, did unlawfully, with malice aforethought, murder and kill Sam Crow, by shooting him, the said Sam Crow, contrary to the statutes in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State.”

Ho further statement is necessary.

*J. T. Williams*and *Bounds & Bounds,*for appellant.

*Ii. L. Henry,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

*39DAVIDSOH, Judge.

Omitting preceding portions, the indictment charges, that appellant "did unlawfully, with malice aforethought, murder and kill Sam Crow, by shooting the said Sam Crow.”

It was moved in arrest of judgment, that the indictment was fatally defective, because it failed to allege the means or weapon used by appellant in committing the homicide. We think the motion should have prevailed.

Such has always been the law, and under the common sense indictment act of 1881, this is required. Willson’s Crim. Proc., art. 428k, Form No. 2; Drye v. The State, 14 Texas Crim. App., 191; Cudd v. The State, 28 Texas Crim. App., 124. The rule in this respect requires the means or weapon employed in bringing about the homicide must be set forth, if known; and if not known, that fact must be pleaded in appropriate terms. Sheppard v. The State, 17 Texas Crim. App., 74; Walker v. The State, 14 Texas Crim. App., 609.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.

*Reversed and dismissed.*

Judges all present and concurring.
#### § 25.305 Preference in admission.

A recipient to which §§ 25.300 through 25.310 apply shall not give preference to applicants for admission, on the basis of attendance at any educational institution or other school or entity that admits as students only or predominantly members of one sex, if the giving of such preference has the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 25.300 through 25.310.
-----Original Message----- 

From: wolfspiritjhp@me.com [mailto:wolfspiritjhp@me.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:56 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

John Pieper 

"1675 Livingston Avenue, 210" 

west St. Paul, MN 55118