alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
98-2547.

#### Henley v. White.

In Prohibition. On motion to dismiss of Michael R. White and on motion *to*dismiss of state of Ohio, Ohio General Assembly, Governor George V. Voinovich, and Dr. John M. Goff. Motions to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
§ 178.33a-9 Marking. ( a ) By means of printing, lithographing, embossing, or stamping, each container must be marked to show: ( 1 ) DOT-2Q.
( 2 ) Name or symbol of person making the mark specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. Symbol, if used, must be registered with the Associate Administrator.
( b ) [Reserved]
[Amdt. 178-40, 41 FR 38181, Sept. 9, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 178-97, 56 FR 66287, Dec. 20, 1991; 66 FR 45386, Aug. 28, 2001]
#### § 260.21 Eligibility.

The Administrator may make a direct loan to an Applicant, or guarantee the payment of the principal balance and any interest of an obligation of an Applicant prior to, on, or after the date of execution or the date of disbursement of such obligation, if the proceeds of such direct loan or obligation shall be, or have been, used by the Applicant for the eligible purposes listed in § 260.5(a)(1), (2), and (3).
#### Carrie E. Clark, *Appellant, v.*The Rochester City and Brighton Railway Company, *Respondent.*

— Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
-----Original Message----- 

From: radayton@sbcglobal.net [mailto:radayton@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:34 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

RuthAnne Dayton 

310 Lovers Ln. 

Vacaville, CA 95688
You are here: EPA Home Region 9 Air SIPs California El Dorado County APCD-Mountain Counties Air Basin

Air Quality State Implementation Plans (SIPs)

Rule

Number Title AdoptionDate

FR

Publication

Date

Citation

Regulation 1 - Definitions

102 Definitions 05/03/1984 49 FR 18832

Regulation 2 - Prohibitions

203 Exceptions 11/18/1983 48 FR 52450

206 Incinerator Burning/Pathological Incinerators 11/18/1983 48 FR 52450

207 Particulate Matter 11/18/1983 48 FR 52450

209 Fossil Fuel-Steam 11/18/1983 48 FR 52450

210 Specific Contaminants 11/18/1983 48 FR 52450

211 Process Weight Per Hour 11/18/1983 48 FR 52450

212 Process Weight Table 11/18/1983 48 FR 52450

213 Storage of Petroleum Products at Terminals 01/24/1985 50 FR 3338

214 Transfer of Gasoline into Stationary Storage Containers 05/03/1984 49 FR 18829

216 Organic Compounds 01/24/1985 50 FR 3338

217 Acid Fumes 01/29/1985 50 FR 3907

218 Perc Dry Cleaning Operations 05/03/1984 49 FR 18829

219 Emission Control Requirements 05/03/1984 49 FR 18829

220 Exemptions to Rule 218 & 219 05/03/1984 49 FR 18829

221 Reduction of Animal Matter 11/18/1983 48 FR 52450

222 Abrasive Blasting 11/18/1983 48 FR 52450

223 Fugitive Dust 11/18/1983 48 FR 52450

227 Existing Sources 05/03/1984 49 FR 18830

228 Compliance Tests 05/03/1984 49 FR 18830

Regulation 3 - Open Burning

301 Prohibition from Burning 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

302 Exceptions to Rule 310 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

303 Agricultural Burning 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

304 Range Improvement Burning 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

305 Forest Management Burning 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

306 Land Development Clearing 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

307 Ditch & Road Maintenance 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

308 Hazard Reduction 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

309 Fire Suppression and Training 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

310 Residential Maintenance 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

311 Recreational Activity 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

312 Required Permit 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

313 No Burn Day 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

314 Burning Permits 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

Region 9: Air Programs

http://yosemite.epa.gov/R9/r9sips.nsf/Agency?ReadForm&count=500&state=California&cat=El+Dorado+County+APCDMountain+Counties+Air+Basin Last updated on Monday, September 30, 2013

El Dorado County APCD-Mountain Counties Air Basin|California| SIPS... http://yosemite.epa.gov/R9/r9sips.nsf/Agency?ReadForm&count=500&...

1 of 2 9/25/2013 10:43 AM
315 Minimum Drying Times 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

316 Burning Management 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

317 Mechanized Burners 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

Regulation 5 - Permit To Operate Regulations

514 PublicRecords and Trade Secrets 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

516 Upset and Breakdown Conditions 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

520 Reinstatement 05/27/1982 47 FR 23159

Notes

Other relevant information

Top of Page 

El Dorado County APCD-Mountain Counties Air Basin|California| SIPS... http://yosemite.epa.gov/R9/r9sips.nsf/Agency?ReadForm&count=500&...

2 of 2 9/25/2013 10:43 AM
Order entered February 12 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 00049 - CV IN RE CATHERINE KARLSENG, Relator Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 08 - 14206 - K 

### O RDER In accordance with the Court’s opinion issued this date, the petition for writ of mandamus is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED . The Court ORDERS the trial judge, the Honorable Craig Smith, Judge of the 192nd Judicial District Court, to VACATE his November 25, 2013 “ Order Granting Plaintiff’s Designation of Assets (Related to Catherine Karlseng R eceived Income) for Turnover to Receiver and Granting Powers and Duties of Receiver
. ” Should the trial judge fail to comply with this order, the writ wil l issue. The Court ORDERS the trial judge to file with this Court, within thirty (30) days of the date of this order , a certified copy of its order issued in compliance with this order. The Court ORDERS relator, Catherine Karlseng, within ten (10) days of the date of this order, either to: (1) dismiss her appeal, cause number 05

- 14

- 00105

- CV, or (2) to file a letter brief in cause number 05

- 14

- 00105

- CV of no more than 3 pages explaining how , inlight of the Court’s disposition of her petition for writ o f mandamus, this Court has jurisdiction over the appeal in cause number 05

- 14

- 00105

- CV
. If Relator files a jurisdiction letter brief, real party may file a responsive letter brief of no more than 3 pages within 10 days of relator’s brief. No extension of time will be granted. If either party will be relying on information not in the record before this Court that party must obtain a supplemental clerk’s record from the trial court containing that information. After it has received briefs regarding the ju risdictional issue, the Court will either: (1) order the appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction; or (2) notify the parties by letter that the Court has jurisdiction over the appeal and, if appropriate, of any pending deadlines. We caution you that fai lure to file a jurisdictional brief may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. We ORDER that relator recover her costs of this original proceeding from real party in interest. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Henry S. Pennypacker, Chief Executive Officer and I, Mary Sellers, Chief
Financial Officer of Mammatech Corporation (the "Company") certify that:

      (1)      I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mammatech
               Corporation;

      (2)      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
               untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
               fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
               circumstances under which such statements were made, not
               misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
               report; and

     (2)      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other
              information included in this quarterly report, fairly present, in
              all material respects, the financial condition, results of
              operations and cash flows of the Company as of and fort the period
              presented in this quarterly report.



/s/ Henry S. Pennypacker
------------------------
Henry S. Pennypacker
Chief Executive Officer and President

January 20, 2009



/s/ Mary Sellers
----------------
Mary Sellers
Chief Financial Officer

January 20, 2009
#### Oscar Bluemner, Respondent, *v.*Michael J. Garvin, Appellant.

*Bluemner*v. Garvin, 143 App. Div. 927, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted April 24, 1911;

decided May 2, 1911.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 17, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action for services.

The motion was made upon the ground that the judgment was not appealable of right to the Court of Appeals and that permission to appeal had not been obtained.

*Joseph M. Hartfield*for motion.

*Peter J. Everett*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
**Exhibit
        4**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul O.
        Richins, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              the
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 
 /s/
        Paul O. Richins
 Paul
        O.
        Richins
 August
        7,
        2007
 
 
 *A
        signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
        document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
        that
        appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
        has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.*
#### § 225.29 Penalties.

Any person (an entity of any type covered under 1 U.S.C. 1, including but not limited to the following: a railroad; a manager, supervisor, official, or other employee or agent of a railroad; any owner, manufacturer, lessor, or lessee of railroad equipment, track, or facilities; any independent contractor providing goods or services to a railroad; and any employee of such owner, manufacturer, lessor, lessee, or independent contractor) who violates any requirement of this part or causes the violation of any such requirement is subject to a civil penalty of at least $1,086 and not more than $35,516 per violation, except that: Penalties may be assessed against individuals only for willful violations, and where a grossly negligent violation or a pattern of repeated violations has created an imminent hazard of death or injury to persons, or has caused death or injury, a penalty not to exceed $142,063 per violation may be assessed. Each day a violation continues shall constitute a separate offense. See FRA's website at *www.fra.dot.gov* for a statement of agency civil penalty policy. A person may also be subject to the criminal penalties provided for in 49 U.S.C. 21311.

[53 FR 28601, July 28, 1988]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting § 225.29, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
-----Original Message----- 

From: dakotaboy@gmail.com [mailto:dakotaboy@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 3:09 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Peter Wilsnack 

401 E Mercer St #33 

Seattle, WA 98102
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 861 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 861

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 2001

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To make technical amendments to section 10 of title 9, United States 
                                 Code.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VACATION OF AWARDS.

    Section 10 of title 9, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by indenting the margin of paragraphs (1) through (4) 
        of subsection (a) 2 ems;
            (2) by striking ``Where'' in such paragraphs and inserting 
        ``where'';
            (3) by striking the period at the end of paragraphs (1), 
        (2), and (3) of subsection (a) and inserting a semicolon and by 
        adding ``or'' at the end of paragraph (3);
            (4) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
            (5) in paragraph (5), by striking ``Where an award'' and 
        inserting ``If an award'', by inserting a comma after 
        ``expired'', and by redesignating the paragraph as subsection 
        (b).

            Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 209.105 Notice of probable violation. ( a ) FRA, through the Chief Counsel, begins a civil penalty proceeding by serving a notice of probable violation on a person charging him or her with having violated one or more provisions of subchapter A or C of chapter I, subtitle B of this title. FRA's website at *www.fra.dot.gov* contains guidelines used by the chief counsel in making initial penalty assessments.
( b ) A notice of probable violation issued under this section includes: ( 1 ) A statement of the provision(s) which the respondent is believed to have violated;
( 2 ) A statement of the factual allegations upon which the proposed civil penalty is being sought;
( 3 ) Notice of the maximum amount of civil penalty for which the respondent may be liable;
( 4 ) Notice of the amount of the civil penalty proposed to be assessed;
( 5 ) A description of the manner in which the respondent should make payment of any money to the United States;
( 6 ) A statement of the respondent's right to present written explanations, information or any materials in answer to the charges or in mitigation of the penalty; and
( 7 ) A statement of the respondent's right to request a hearing and the procedures for requesting a hearing.
( c ) The FRA may amend the notice of probable violation at any time prior to the entry of an order assessing a civil penalty. If the amendment contains any new material allegation of fact, the respondent is given an opportunity to respond. In an amended notice, FRA may change the civil penalty amount proposed to be assessed up to and including the maximum penalty amount of $99,756 for each violation, except that if the violation results in death, serious illness or severe injury to any person, or substantial destruction of property, FRA may change the penalty amount proposed to be assessed up to and including the maximum penalty amount of $232,762.
[42 FR 56742, Oct. 28, 1977, as amended at 61 FR 38646, July 25, 1996; 69 FR 30591, May 28, 2004; 71 FR 77295, Dec. 26, 2006; 75 FR 43842, July 27, 2010; 78 FR 9846, Feb. 12, 2013; 81 FR 43104, July 1, 2016; 82 FR 16131, Apr. 3, 2017; 83 FR 60745, Nov. 27, 2018; 84 FR 23733, May 23, 2019; 84 FR 37072, July 31, 2019; 86 FR 1756, Jan. 11, 2021; 86 FR 23252, May 3, 2021; 87 FR 15866, Mar. 21, 2022; 88 FR 1125, Jan. 6, 2023; 88 FR 89561, Dec. 28, 2023]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                                                      ----------


                        SUBSIDIARIES OF EKCO GROUP, INC.

         The following are the subsidiaries of the registrant, all of which are
wholly-owned except for Woodstream Corporation, which is majority-owned:

                                                         JURISDICTION OF
SUBSIDIARY NAME                                          INCORPORATION  
---------------                                          ---------------

OPERATING SUBSIDIARIES:

Aspen Pet Products, Inc.                                 Delaware

B. VIA International Housewares, Inc.                    Delaware

EKCO Canada Inc.                                         Ontario, Canada

EKCO Cleaning, Inc.                                      Massachusetts

EKCO Distribution of Illinois, Inc.                      Delaware

EKCO International Housewares Limited                    United Kingdom

EKCO International, Inc.                                 Delaware

EKCO Housewares, Inc.                                    Delaware

EKCO Manufacturing of Ohio, Inc.                         Delaware

Woodstream Corporation                                   Pennsylvania


INACTIVE SUBSIDIARIES:

APP Holding Corporation                                  Delaware

CSC of Tennessee, Inc.                                   Tennessee

Delhi Manufacturing Corporation                          Delaware

EKCO Capital Enterprises, Inc.                           Delaware

EKCO Consumer Plastics, Inc.                             Massachusetts

EKCO Wood Products Co.                                   Delaware

Fenwick                                                  California

FPI, Inc.                                                Washington

Trappe of Aspen, Inc.                                    Pennsylvania

Wright-Bernet, Inc.                                      Ohio
§ 236.557 Receiver; location with respect to rail. ( a ) Receiver of intermittent inductive automatic train stop device of the inert roadway element type shall be maintained with bottom of the receiver at a height above the plane of the tops of the rails, and with its outer edge at a horizontal distance from the gage side of the nearest rail, in accordance with specifications of the carrier.
( b ) Receiver of continuous inductive automatic cab signal, train stop, or train control device of locomotive equipped with onboard test equipment, shall be maintained with the bottom of the receiver at a height above the plane of the tops of the rails, and with its outer edge at a horizontal distance from the gage side of the nearest rail, in accordance with specifications of the carrier.
[49 FR 3387, Jan. 26, 1984]
#### John F. Clark et al., Respondents, *v.*James Kirkland, Appellant.

*Clark*v. *Kirkland,*133 App. Div. 836, affirmed.

(Argued May 12, 1911;

decided May 30, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 13, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to remove a cloud upon title to real property.

*Albert T. Wilkinson*for appellant.

*William S. Mackie*and *Smith M. Lindsley*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, November 1, 1995 (138), Para 138.14 D.C. Appropriations, FY 1996]
[Page 1826]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.138.14  d.c. appropriations, fy 1996

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HANSEN, pursuant to House Resolution 252 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the consideration of the bill 
(H.R. 2546) making appropriations for the government of the District of 
Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in part against the 
revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, 
and for other purposes.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HANSEN, by unanimous consent, designated 
Mr. HASTINGS of Washington as Chairman of the Committee of the Whole; 
and after some time spent therein,
```
Exhibit 32 .1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viropro, Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jean-Marie Dupuy, acting as Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Jean-Marie Dupuy ___________________________________________________ Jean-Marie Dupuy, Director, President, CEO and acting CFO  Date:  October 13, 2006
-----Original Message----- 

From: Mules_are_us@yahoo.com [mailto:Mules_are_us@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:53 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Cynthia Petrich 

5501 Campbell lake road 

Anacortes, WA 98221