alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1111.5 Answers and cross complaints. ( a ) *Generally.* Other than in cases under Final Offer Rate Review, which does not require the filing of an answer, an answer shall be filed within the time provided in paragraph (c) of this section. An answer should be responsive to the complaint and should fully advise the Board and the parties of the nature of the defense. In answering a complaint challenging the reasonableness of a rail rate, the defendant should indicate whether it will contend that the Board is deprived of jurisdiction to hear the complaint because the revenue-variable cost percentage generated by the traffic is less than 180 percent, or the traffic is subject to effective product or geographic competition. In response to a complaint filed under Simplified-SAC or Three-Benchmark, the answer must include the defendant's preliminary estimate of the variable cost of each challenged movement calculated using the unadjusted figures produced by the URCS Phase III program.
( b ) *Disclosure with Simplified-SAC or Three-Benchmark answer.* The defendant must provide to the complainant all documents that it relied upon to determine the inputs used in the URCS Phase III program.
( c ) *Time for filing; copies; service.* Other than in cases under Final Offer Rate Review, which does not require the filing of an answer, an answer must be filed with the Board within 20 days after the service of the complaint or within such additional time as the Board may provide. The defendant must serve copies of the answer upon the complainant and any other defendants.
( d ) *Cross complaints.* A cross complaint alleging violations by other parties to the proceeding or seeking relief against them may be filed with the answer. An answer to a cross complaint shall be filed within 20 days after the service date of the cross complaint. The party shall serve copies of an answer to a cross complaint upon the other parties.
( e ) *Failure to answer complaint.* Other than in cases under Final Offer Rate Review, which does not require the filing of an answer, averments in a complaint are admitted when not denied in an answer to the complaint.
( f ) *Discovery in stand-alone cost cases.* Upon filing its answer, the defendant shall certify that it has served its initial discovery requests on the complainant. If the complainant tenders an amended or supplemental complaint to which the defendant must reply, upon filing the answer to the amended or supplemental complaint, the defendant shall certify that it has served on the complainant those initial discovery requests affected by the amended or supplemental complaint, if any.
[82 FR 57379, Dec. 5, 2017, as amended at 84 FR 12944, Apr. 3, 2019; 88 FR 318, Jan. 4, 2023]
The Honor able Kathleen McD onald O’ M a ll e y , United States District J udg e for the Northe rn * District of Ohio, sitting by desig nation. NO T R EC OM M EN DE D F OR F UL L- TEX T P UB LIC AT ION F ile Nam e: 07a0427n.06 F iled: Jun e 20, 2007 No. 06-3430 UN ITED STA TES C OU RT OF AP P EA LS F OR THE SI XT H C IR CU IT

SPEEDY MUL CH L L C; DANI ELSPEEDY, Pla int if fs -A pp e lla nts , v. D O N A L D J. GADD; VI L L AGE OF BY ESVI L L E, De fe nd ants -A

pp e lle e s. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEALFROM THE U NI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT FOR THE S O U T H E R

N D IS T R IC T O F O H IO

Be fore : ROGERS, C OOK, Circuit Judges; and O ’MAL L EY, District Judge. *

PER CURI AM. Speedy Mulch L L C and Danie l Speedy appea l the district court’s g rant of summary judgme nt to the defe ndants Donald Ga dd and the Villag e of Byesville. Havingrevie wed the re cord a

nd the applica

ble law, and having the benef it of oral a rgument and the pa

rties’ brie fs, we deter mine that no jurisprudential purpose would be ser ved by a pane l opinion. W e af

firm the district court’s decision larg ely for the rea sons stated in that c ourt’s opinion with a cave at about the c ourt’s treatment of the plaintiffs’ F irst Amendment re taliation claim. The plainti ffs a lleg ed that Mayor Gadd reta liated ag ainst them beca use Speedy spoke out a g ainst him a nd sup p o rt ed an o pposing candidate for may or. Acc ording to the plaintiffs’ Amende d Complaint, t his retaliation took the formNo. 06-3430

Speedy Mulch LLC, et al. v. Gadd, et al.

- 2 - of “a taking of Plaintiffs’ per sonal and re al prop er t y i n tere sts with threats of a la wsuit.” As the district court cor

rec tly rec og nized, a “re taliation claim essential l y entails three elements: (1) the plaintiff eng ag ed in protec ted conduc t; (2) an a dverse action wa s taken a g ainst the plaintiff that would deter

a per son of ordinar

y firmness fr om continuing to e ng ag e in that conduc t; and (3) ther e is a ca usal conne ction betwee n elements one and two—that is, the adver se action was motivated at least in part by the plaintiff’s pr otected c onduct.” Thaddeus-X v. Blatter , 175 F.3d 378, 394 ( 6th Cir. 1999). Our r eview c onfirms that the plaintiffs met the f irst two prong s of this test—S peedy eng ag ed in pr ote c te d co nd

uc t, an d the pla int if

fs de mon str a te op po sit ion by a g ov e rnme nt o ff

ic ia l th a t w ou ld deter a per son of ordinar

y firmness fr om speaking . To the extent that the district court’s opinion ca n be re ad to re quire the pla intiffs to show that the opposition deterre d Sp ee d y i n a subjec tive sense, we do not endorse it s view. Neve rtheless, as the di strict court properly conclude d, the plaintiffs ar e unable to mee t their burden to de monstrate any causa l nexus betwee n S p eedy ’s spee ch and the de fe nd ants ’ a c tio ns . Th e re c or d d oe s n ot s up po rt the c on c lus ion

that th e a lle g e dly

re ta liator y laws uit stemmed from a

ny thing other

than a business dispute unre lated to Speedy ’s spee ch.

We affir m the district court’s judg ment for the r easons se t forth above

.
**Exhibit 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, W. Douglas Parker, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of America West Airlines, Inc. (the “Company”) and Derek J. Kerr, the Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:
1.  The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2.  The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 25th day of April 2005.    /s/ W. Douglas Parker      W. Douglas Parker Chief Executive Officer    /s/ Derek J. Kerr      Derek J. Kerr Chief Financial Officer
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 17

- 2535

_____________________________ R OOSEVELT C ARROLL , J R

. , Petitioner ,

v.

J ULIE L. J ONES Secretary , Florida Dep artment of Corrections , Respondent

.

________________ _____________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

— Original Jurisdiction.
December 12, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
D ENIED

. O STERHAUS , W INOKUR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Roosevelt Carroll, Jr., pro se, Petitioner

. Kenneth Steely, General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, and Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Amanda Sto kes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent

.
#### § 236.750 Interlocking, automatic.

An arrangement of signals, with or without other signal appliances, which functions through the exercise of inherent powers as distinguished from those whose functions are controlled manually, and which are so interconnected by means of electric circuits that their movements must succeed each other in proper sequence, train movements over all routes being governed by signal indication.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 29, 1995 (123), Para 123.41 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1492]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.123.41  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. YOUNG of Alaska: Committee on Resources. H.R. 1815. A 
     bill to authorize appropriations for the National Oceanic and 
     Atmospheric Administration for fiscal year 1996, and for 
     other purposes; with an amendment (Rept. No. 104-237 Pt. 2). 
     Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 
     the Union.
       Mr. QUILLEN: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 234. 
     Resolution providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 
     2405) to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 1996 and 
     1997 for civilian science activities of the Federal 
     Government, and for other purposes (Rept. No. 104-270). 
     Referred to the House Calendar.
       Mr. LINDER: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 235. 
     Resolution waiving points of order against the conference 
     report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1976) making 
     appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and 
     Drug Administration, and related agencies programs for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes 
     (Rept. No. 104-271). Referred to the House Calendar.
       Mr. McCOLLUM: Committee on the Judiciary. H.R. 2259. A bill 
     to disapprove certain sentencing guideline amendments (Rept. 
     No. 104-272). Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on 
     the State of the Union.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 19, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Todd B. Barnum, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Todd B. Barnum
-------------------------------------
Todd B. Barnum, Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer

March 30, 2006

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.


                                                                              24
From: dennis@virgosongs.com [mailto:dennis@virgosongs.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:09 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Dennis Kilman 

24303 Woolsey Canyon Rd 

Canoga Park, CA 91304
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, October 19, 1995 (131), Para 131.16 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 2492]
[Page 1569]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.131.16  providing for the consideration of h.r. 2492

  Mrs. WALDHOLTZ, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported 
(Rept. No. 104-283) the resolution (H. Res. 239) providing for 
consideration for the bill (H.R. 2492) making appropriations for the 
Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and 
for other purposes.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Tehama County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Red Bluff, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Introductions, (2) Approve Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) Project Proposals/Action, (5) Chairman's Perspective, (6) General Discussion, (7) Next Agenda. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on August 30, 2007 from 9 a.m. and end at approximately 12 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Lincoln Street School, Pine Room, 1135 Lincoln Street, Red Bluff, CA. Individuals wishing to speak or propose agenda items must send their names and proposals to Eduardo Olmedo, DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Bobbin Gaddini, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, P.O. Box 164, Elk Creek, CA 95939. (530) 968-5329; e-mail                         *ggadini@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided and individuals who made written requests by August 27, 2007 will have the opportunity to address the Committee at those sessions. 

Dated: August 9, 2007. 

Randy Jero, 

Acting Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 07-4005 Filed 8-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 173 (Friday, September 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 51421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4378]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Notice of Intent To Hold a Public Meeting To Take Public Comments 
on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement on Rock Mining 
in Wetlands in the Lake Belt Region of Miami-Dade County, FL

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Jacksonville District 
issued a draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) on 
August 17, 2007 to evaluate potential impacts of further rock mining 
within wetlands in western Miami-Dade County, FL. In order to accept 
public comments on the Draft SEIS, the Corps has scheduled a public 
meeting. The Corps invites Federal agencies, American Indian Tribal 
Nations, state and local governments, and other interested private 
organizations and parties to attend the public meeting and to comment 
on the draft SEIS.

DATES: The Corps plans to hold a public meeting on September 18, 2007 
at 6:30 p.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Miami Dade Fire Rescue 
Headquarters, 9300 NW 41st Street, Doral, FL 33178. (786) 331-5000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Leah Oberlin, (561) 472-3506.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Corps will provide additional 
notification of the meeting time and location through newspaper 
advertisements and other means. Following a short presentation on the 
draft SEIS, verbal and written comments on the draft SEIS will be 
accepted. A transcript of verbal comments will be generated to ensure 
accuracy. A spanish language translator will be available. To submit 
comments on the draft SEIS or to request copies of materials related to 
this effort as they become available to the public, contact: Ms. Leah 
Oberlin, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Division, Palm Beach 
Gardens Regulatory Office, 4400 PGA Boulevard, Suite 500, Palm Beach 
Gardens, FL, 33410, by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#48042d2920660966072a2d3a242126083b2922787a663d3b292b2d66293a253166252124"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f4b891959cdab5dabb969186989d9ab487959ec4c6da8187959791da9586998dda999d98">[email protected]</span></a>, 
or by telephone at (561) 472-3506. Comments or requests for information 
can also be submitted on the Lake Belt SEIS Web site at http://www.lakebeltseis.com. The Corps will consider all comments for the 
scope of the SEIS received by October 16, 2007.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-4378 Filed 9-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-AJ-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000706270
<NAME> AMERICA WEST AIRLINES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         146,650
<SECURITIES>                                     1,056
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,599
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,917
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               309,097
<PP&E>                                         929,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                 217,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,583,725
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          497,776
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     646,379
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,583,725
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               939,943
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  855,897
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  1500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 68,664
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,723
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,941
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
SERVED: July 22, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

In The Matter Of: 

HEALTHTEX 

DISTRIBUTORS, INC. 

Respondent 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS '_;: .•·•, 

WASHINGTON, DC 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2013-0285 

Case No. 2012S0700278 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On July 1, 2013, an Order Setting Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, and 

Directing Rule 26(f) Planning and Submission was filed. Among other things, this Order set the 

Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference for Tuesday, August 6, 2013 at 11 :00 a.m. Eastern 

time and set Tuesday, July 30, 2013, as the deadline for filing a proposed discovery plan. 

On July 22,2013, the FAA filed a Withdrawal of Complaint stating that the parties had 

reached a settlement. 

After reviewing all relevant caselaw, decisions, ·regulations, statutory authority, and being 

fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The July 30, 2013 deadline for filing a proposed discovery plan is cancelled. 

2. The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference set for August 6, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. 

Eastern time is cancelled. 

3. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the FAA has withdrawn its Complaint, and this 

proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List 
·• 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Andrea Michelle Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P. 0. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

Natividad R. Elias, President 

Healthtex Distributors, Inc., Respondent 

3555 N.W. 41st Street 

Miami, Florida 33142 

TEL: 305-633-7900 

FAX: 305-633-7666 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Oft1ce of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0285 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 

20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
§ 230.48 Number and capacity. ( a ) *Number and capacity.* Every boiler shall be equipped with at least two safety relief valves, suitable for the service intended, that are capable of preventing an accumulation of pressure greater than 6 percent above the MAWP under any conditions of service. An FRA inspector may require verification of sufficient safety valve relieving capacity.
( b ) *Determination of capacity.* Safety relief valve capacity may be determined by making an accumulation test with the fire in good, bright condition and all steam outlets closed. Additional safety relief valve capacity shall be provided if the safety relief valves allow an excess pressure of more than 6 percent above the MAWP during this test.