alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Emily M. Frank, also known as Emily M. Cofrancisco, v. Frank Kempczynski.

*259
      *(February*8, 1950.)

Layton, J., sitting.

*Thomas Herlihy, Jr.,*for the Plaintiff. ' '•

*William Prickeit*for the Defendant.

Superior Court for New Castle County,

Civil Action No. 9,

1950.

The particular items concerning which defendant has moved for a more particular statement are as follows:

“Drugs and medicines purchased from Latin-American

Drug Company, AVilmington, Delaware ........$ 100.00

Transportation expenses to doctors, hospitals and for other necessary purposes resulting from the injury . . 300.00

Clothing and glasses damage ...................... AVill Hospital, 16th & Spring Garden St., Philadelphia, 100.00

Pennsylvania .......................:........ 100.00

University of Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ...................................'. T 50.00

Loss of wages....................................' 6,000.00

Board and lodging to Mrs. Ann Dougherty, AAOlmington, Delaware ..................................... 1,500.00

Dr. Edmund B. Spaeth, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania .,. 100.00’’

*260Rule 9 (g) ¡of the Superior Court Rules reads as follows: “(g). Special Damage. When items of special damage are Claimed, they shall be specifically stated.”

Defendant’s motion for further specification of special damages is very searching. For instance, as to the out of pocket expenses for $100 for drugs, he seeks to know the kind of drugs and medicine purchased, from whom pm chased and the dates and cost of each purchase. The details of ail the other claimed items of damage are sought with equal particularity.

Layton, Judge.

Plaintiff has stated her items of special damage with reasonable certainty. She has broken them down into hospital bills, doctor’s bills, drugs, loss of wages, board and lodging, etc. This is all that Rule 9 (g) requires. What defendaht is seeking is an itemization of the various items of plaintiff’s claim for special damages. Such a result would compel the statement of special damages to be drawn out in greater detail than formerly required by the rules of Common Law pleading prior to the adoption of the new rules of this Court. The Discovery Rules provide other means by which defendant may obtain such highly detailed information.

Motion is denied.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, September 25, 1995 (120), Para 120.6 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1451]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.120.6  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. YOUNG of Florida: Committee of conference. Conference 
     report on H.R. 2126. A bill making appropriations for the 
     Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 
     30, 1996, and for other purposes (Rept. No. 104-261). Ordered 
     to be printed.
```
§ 273.7 Customer service. ( a ) *Customer satisfaction.* The customer satisfaction metric is the percent of respondents to the Amtrak customer satisfaction survey who provided a score of 70 percent or greater for their “overall satisfaction” on a 100 point scale for their most recent trip, by route, shown both adjusted for performance and unadjusted.
( b ) *Amtrak personnel.* The Amtrak personnel metric is the average score from respondents to the Amtrak customer satisfaction survey for their overall review of Amtrak personnel on their most recent trip, by route.
( c ) *Information given.* The information given metric is the average score from respondents to the Amtrak customer satisfaction survey for their overall review of information provided by Amtrak on their most recent trip, by route.
( d ) *On-board comfort.* The on-board comfort metric is the average score from respondents to the Amtrak customer satisfaction survey for their overall review of on-board comfort on their most recent trip, by route.
( e ) *On-board cleanliness.* The on-board cleanliness metric is the average score from respondents to the Amtrak customer satisfaction survey for their overall review of on-board cleanliness on their most recent trip, by route.
( f ) *On-board food service.* The on-board food service metric is the average score from respondents to the Amtrak customer satisfaction survey for their overall review of on-board food service on their most recent trip, by route.
October 14, 2015

Mr. David Bendersky

Skybender Aviation

3025 Northeast 103 Street

Seattle, WA 98125

Dear Mr. Bendersky:

This is in response to your June 24, 2015, letter posted to the docket (No. FAA−2015−2430) 

petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption from Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). You requested to conduct aerial videography, photography,

and cinematography using an unmanned aerial system.

The information you submitted did not comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81. On 

June 29, 2015, the FAA sent you a letter stating that we were unable to process your request 

without further information. Specifically, we asked you to provide the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it 

would benefit the public as a whole.

On July 20, 2015, the FAA received additional information. The FAA has reviewed the 

information and finds that you did not provide the sections from which you seek relief and 

why granting the request would be in the public interest.
2

Because your petition lacks sufficient information to proceed, the FAA has closed your 

exemption request. Should you wish to provide the additional information, please resubmit 

your petition for exemption to the public docket.

Sincerely,

/s/

Lirio Liu

Director, Office of Rulemaking
#### § 230.26 Tensile strength of shell plates.

When the tensile strength of steel or wrought-iron shell plates is not known, it shall be taken at 50,000 psi for steel and 45,000 psi for wrought iron.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDetermination of depth-viewing volumes for stereo three-dimensional graphic displaysReal-world, 3-D, pictorial displays incorporating true depth cues via stereopsis techniques offer a potential means of displaying complex information in a natural way to prevent loss of situational awareness and provide increases in pilot/vehicle performance in advanced flight display concepts. Optimal use of stereopsis requires an understanding of the depth viewing volume available to the display designer. Suggested guidelines are presented for the depth viewing volume from an empirical determination of the effective region of stereopsis cueing (at several viewer-CRT screen distances) for a time multiplexed stereopsis display system. The results provide the display designer with information that will allow more effective placement of depth information to enable the full exploitation of stereopsis cueing. Increasing viewer-CRT screen distances provides increasing amounts of usable depth, but with decreasing fields-of-view. A stereopsis hardware system that permits an increased viewer-screen distance by incorporating larger screen sizes or collimation optics to maintain the field-of-view at required levels would provide a much larger stereo depth-viewing volume.Document ID19900013649Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsParrish, Russell V.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Williams, Steven P.*(Army Aviation Systems Command Saint Louis, MO., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1990Subject CategoryMan/System Technology And Life SupportReport/Patent NumberL-16655NAS 1.60:2999AVSCOM-TM-90-B-016NASA-TP-2999Accession Number90N22965Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-66-11-02PROJECT: DA PROJ. 1L1-61102-AH-45Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013649.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 17, 1995 (129), Para 129.30 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 2259]
[Page 1533]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.129.30  providing for the consideration of h.r. 2259

  Ms. PRYCE, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. No. 
104-279) the resolution (H. Res. 237) providing for the consideration of 
(H.R. 2259) to disapprove certain sentencing guideline amendments.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                EXHIBIT (11)

                             WALL STREET DELI, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                                  (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            For the                                 For the
                                                       Three Months Ended                      Nine Months Ended
SHARES:                                            March 29,1997   March 30, 1996        March 29, 1997  March 30, 1996   
                                                   -------------   --------------        --------------  --------------
  <S>                                                 <C>              <C>                   <C>             <C>           
  Weighted average number of common shares                                                                               
  outstanding                                          3,167,436        3,407,608             3,300,801       3,407,176   
  Effect of shares issuable under stock option                                                                           
  plan as determined by the treasury stock                                                                               
  method                                                      --            8,998                 1,847          24,122   
                                                       ---------        ---------            ----------       ---------  
  Weighted average number of common shares                                                                               
  outstanding as adjusted                              3,167,436        3,416,607             3,302,648       3,431,298
PER COMMON SHARE COMPUTATIONS:                                                                                           
      Net income                                       $ 100,586       $   57,754            $  471,044      $  127,359
                                                       =========       ==========            ==========      ==========
Earnings per share:                                    $     .03       $      .02            $      .14      $      .04
                                                       =========       ==========            ==========      ==========
</TABLE>


                                      18
#### § 238.321 Out-of-service credit.

When a passenger car is out of service for 30 or more consecutive days or is out of service when it is due for any test or inspection required by § 238.307 or § 238.309 an out of use notation showing the number of out of service days shall be made in the records required under §§ 238.307(e) and 238.309(f). If the passenger car is out of service for one or more periods of at least 30 consecutive days, the interval prescribed for any test or inspection required by §§ 238.307 and 238.309 may be extended by the number of days in each period the passenger car is out of service since the last test or inspection in question. A movement made in accordance with § 229.9 of this chapter or § 238.17 is not considered service for the purposes of determining the out-of-service credit.

[71 FR 61862, Oct. 19, 2006]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000703645
<NAME> SPECIALTY CHEMICAL RESOURCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                           3,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,008,974
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  7,941,711
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,481,039
<PP&E>                                      18,207,565
<DEPRECIATION>                             (6,157,952)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,671,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,198,357
<BONDS>                                     17,543,170
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       394,777
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,534,711
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,671,015
<SALES>                                     19,386,151
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,386,151
<CGS>                                       15,640,265
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,640,265
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             801,504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (567,195)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (567,195)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (567,195)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Highlights from pathways to desistance:a longitudinal study of serious adolescent offenders**
 
PDF | Mobi| ePub
 
SuDoc Number:J 32.2:AD 7/2
Item Number:0718-A-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000892938
 
February 10, 2020
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2455 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2455

To require that travel awards that accrue by reason of official travel 
      of a Member, officer, or employee of the Senate or House of 
 Representatives be used only for official travel or transferred to a 
                   qualified non-profit organization.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 10, 1995

Mr. Thornberry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on House Oversight, and in addition to the Committee on 
  Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require that travel awards that accrue by reason of official travel 
      of a Member, officer, or employee of the Senate or House of 
 Representatives be used only for official travel or transferred to a 
                   qualified non-profit organization.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Frequent Flyer Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. USE OF FREQUENT FLYER MILES.

    Section 507 of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-1; 2 U.S.C. 1436) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by inserting ``(1)'' before 
                ``Notwithstanding''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following new 
                paragraph:
    ``(2) The Member for whose office the travel was performed may 
transfer any travel award to an organization described in section 
501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that is exempt from tax 
under section 501(a) of such Act.''; and
            (2) by inserting ``or House of Representatives'' after 
        ``Senate'' each place it appears.

SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of Congress that commercial airlines that offer 
travel awards should provide that such travel awards are transferable 
in a manner consistent with this Act.
                                 <all>
```
----

----

Henry County Bancshares 10-Q

| Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|-----------------------------------------------|

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   | /s/ David H. Gill                |   |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   | David H. Gill, President and CEO |   |
|   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)    |   |
|   |   |   |                             |   |

|   |   |   | /s/ Charles W. Blair, Jr.                         |   |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   | Charles W. Blair, Jr., EVP & CFO              |   |
|   |   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |
|   |   |   |                                              |   |
#### George D. Purdy and others, *Appellants, v.*Samuel A. Hayt and Lewis H. White, *Executors, etc.,*and others, Respondents.

Decree of surrogate upon appeal of Purdy and others affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Barnard, P. J. Decree of surrogate

upon appeal of Mrs. Bates and children affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-60815

Summary Calendar

Mijanur Rahman Chowdhury, 

Petitioner,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, 

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Agency No. A203 718 932

Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Duncan and Oldham, Circuit 

Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Mijanur Rahman Chowdhury petitions for review of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals’s (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal from an order of 

the Immigration Judge (IJ) denying his application for asylum, withholding 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 23, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-60815 Document: 00516483246 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/23/2022
No. 21-60815

2

of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). 

Chowdhury challenges the BIA’s adverse credibility determination, which he 

contends was erroneously based on minor discrepancies, omissions, and 

translation errors in his parents’ affidavits. We generally review only the 

BIA’s decision except to the extent that the IJ’s ruling influences the BIA. 

Singh v. Sessions, 880 F.3d 220, 224 (5th Cir. 2018).

The BIA provided “specific and cogent reasons derived from the 

record” to support the adverse credibility finding. Zhang v. Gonzales, 432 

F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005). Chowdhury has failed to demonstrate that it 

is clear from the totality of the circumstances that no reasonable factfinder 

could make an adverse credibility ruling in his case. See Wang v. Holder, 569 

F.3d 531, 538-40 (5th Cir. 2009). Without credible evidence, there was no 

basis for the BIA to grant asylum or withholding of removal. See Arulnanthy 

v. Garland, 17 F.4th 586, 597 (5th Cir. 2021); Chun v. INS, 40 F.3d 76, 79 

(5th Cir. 1994). Additionally, we lack jurisdiction over Chowdhury’s 

unexhausted CAT claim. See Martinez-Guevara v. Garland, 27 F.4th 353, 360 

(5th Cir. 2022).

Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED IN PART and

DISMISSED IN PART for lack of jurisdiction. Retained counsel’s 

motion to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary.

Case: 21-60815 Document: 00516483246 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/23/2022
EXHIBIT 21





                             FIRSTENERGY CORP.

                  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                           AT DECEMBER 31, 2003


Ohio Edison Company - Incorporated in Ohio

The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company - Incorporated in Ohio

The Toledo Edison Company - Incorporated in Ohio

Centerior Service Company - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Properties Company - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Ventures Corporation - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Facilities Services Group, LLC - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Securities Transfer Company - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Service Company - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Solutions Corp. - Incorporated in Ohio

MARBEL Energy Corporation - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Holdings, LLC - Incorporated in Ohio

FE Acquisition Corp. - Incorporated in Ohio

American Transmission Systems, Inc. - Incorporated in Ohio

FELHC, Inc. - Incorporated in Ohio

Jersey Central Power & Light Company - Incorporated in New Jersey

Metropolitan Edison Company - Incorporated in Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Electric Company - Incorporated in Pennsylvania

GPU Advanced Resources, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware

GPU Capital, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware

GPU Diversified Holdings, LLC - Incorporated in Delaware

GPU Nuclear, Inc. - Incorporated in New Jersey

GPU Power, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware

GPU Service, Inc. - Incorporated in Pennsylvania

GPU Telecom Services, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware

MYR Group, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware



                        Statement of Differences
                        ------------------------

Exhibit Number 21, List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant at December 31, 2003,
is not included in the printed document.