alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 232.101 Scope.

This subpart contains general operating, performance, and design requirements for each railroad that operates freight or other non-passenger trains and for specific equipment used in those operations.
#### § 221.1 Scope.

This part prescribes minimum requirements governing highly visible marking devices for the trailing end of the rear car of all passenger, commuter and freight trains. So long as these minimum requirements are met, railroads may adopt additional or more stringent requirements for rear end marking devices.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 24, 1995 (133), Para 133.30 Communication from the Clerk--Message from the President]
[Page 1586]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.133.30  communication from the clerk--message from the president

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BLUTE, laid before the House a 
communication, which was read as follows:

                                              Office of the Clerk,

                                     House of Representatives,

                                 Washington, DC, October 24, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     Speaker, House of Representatives,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Speaker: Pursuant to the permission granted in 
     Clause 5 of Rule III of the Rules of the U.S. House of 
     Representatives, I have the honor to transmit a sealed 
     envelope received from the White House on Monday, October 23, 
     1995 at 10:55 a.m. and said to contain a message from the 
     President whereby he transmits notification that he has 
     declared a national emergency regarding foreign narcotics 
     traffickers centered in Columbia.
       With warm regards,
                                                   Robin H. Carle,
                                  Clerk, House of Representatives.
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           OMEGA FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      This certification is intended to accompany Omega Financial Corporation's
(the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30,
2003 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. To the best of my knowledge, I, Daniel L. Warfel, hereby certify in my
capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


                                             /s/ Daniel L. Warfel
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Daniel L. Warfel
                                             Chief Financial Officer

Date: July 30, 2003

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.


                                       22
§ 209.327 Appeal. ( a ) Any party aggrieved by an initial decision issued under § 209.323 may file an appeal. The appeal must be filed within 35 days of issuance of the initial decision with the Federal Railroad Administrator, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. A copy of the appeal shall be served on each party. The appeal shall set forth objections to the initial decision, supported by reference to applicable laws and regulations, and with specific reference to the record. If the Administrator has played any role in investigating, prosecuting, or deciding to prosecute the particular case, the Administrator shall recuse him or herself and delegate his or her authority under this section to a person not so involved.
( b ) A party may file a reply to an appeal within 25 days of service of the appeal. If the party relies on evidence contained in the record for the reply, the party shall specifically refer to the pertinent evidence in the record.
( c ) The Administrator may extend the period for filing an appeal or a response for good cause shown, provided the written request for extension is served before the expiration of the applicable period provided in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section.
( d ) The Administrator has sole discretion to permit oral argument on the appeal. On the Administrator's own initiative or upon written motion by any party, the Administrator may determine that oral argument will contribute substantially to the development of the issues on appeal and may grant the parties an opportunity for oral argument.
( e ) The Administrator may affirm, reverse, alter, or modify the decision of the presiding officer, or may remand the case for further proceedings before the presiding officer. The Administrator shall inform the parties and the presiding officer of his or her decision.
( f ) The decision of the Administrator is final, constitutes final agency action, and is not subject to further administrative review.
[54 FR 42907, Oct. 18, 1989, as amended at 74 FR 25171, May 27, 2009; 74 FR 23334, May 19, 2009]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2379 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2379

To amend the Small Business Act to modify requirements relating to the 
 personal net worth of individuals who may be considered economically 
   disadvantaged for the purpose of receiving contract awards under 
                       section 8(a) of that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 1995

  Mr. McHale introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Small Business Act to modify requirements relating to the 
 personal net worth of individuals who may be considered economically 
   disadvantaged for the purpose of receiving contract awards under 
                       section 8(a) of that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Minority Business Development Act of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 8(a)(6) of the Small Business Act (15 
U.S.C. 637(a)(6)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(F) The Administration shall not prohibit the owner of a small 
business concern from qualifying as an economically disadvantaged 
individual for the purpose of participation in the program established 
under this subsection solely on the basis of the personal net worth of 
the owner unless such personal net worth, as computed pursuant to 
subparagraph (E), exceeds $350,000.''.
    (b) Regulations.--The Administrator of the Small Business 
Administration shall modify regulations issued pursuant to section 8(a) 
of the Small Business Act to carry out the amendment made by subsection 
(a) of this section.
                                 <all>
```
NO. 12-15-00037-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF A. B., CHILD

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 402ND 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

WOOD COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed because Appellant B.B. has failed to comply with the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Pursuant to Rule 32.1, B.B.’s

docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e.,

March 4, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1. Because B.B. did not file his docketing statement at 

that time, this court requested by letter dated March 6, 2015, that he file his docketing statement 

within ten days if he had not already done so. B.B. did not file the docketing statement as 

requested. On March 23, 2015, the court notified B.B. that the appeal would be dismissed on or 

before April 2, 2015 unless he filed the required docketing statement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1. 

Moreover, B.B. was notified by letter dated February 13, 2015, that his brief would be 

due on or before March 16, 2015. When B.B. failed to file his brief by the due date, this court, 

by letter dated March 23, 2015, notified B.B. that the brief was past due. The notice warned that 

if no motion for extension of time to file the brief was received by April 2, 2015, the appeal 

would be dismissed for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(b).

The April 2 deadline has passed, and B.B. has not complied with the court’s requests for 

the docketing statement and the motion for extension of time to file his appellate brief. Because 

B.B. has failed, after notice, to comply with Rules 32.1 and 38.6(d), the appeal filed by B.B. is 
2

dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). The appeal filed by A.B. under the same 

appellate cause number is not affected by this dismissal.

Opinion delivered April 15, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

APRIL 15, 2015

NO. 12-15-00037-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A. B., A CHILD

Appeal from the 402nd District Court 

of Wood County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2014-096)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being 

considered, it is the opinion of this court that the appeal filed by B.B. should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that in 

accordance with TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1, 38.6(d) and 42.3, the appeal filed by B.B. is hereby 

dismissed for want of prosecution; and that this decision be certified to the court below for 

observance. The appeal filed by A.B. under the same appellate cause number is not affected 

by this dismissal.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 160 (Monday, August 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 46532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4040]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision

[AC-14: OTS No. H4431]


North Penn Bank, North Penn Mutual Holding Company, North Penn 
Bancorp, Inc., and New North Penn Bancorp, Inc., Scranton, PA; Approval 
of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on August 10, 2007, the Office of 
Thrift Supervision (OTS) approved the application of North Penn Mutual 
Holding Company and North Penn Bank, Scranton, Pennsylvania, to convert 
to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are 
available for inspection by appointment (phone number: 202-906-5922 or 
e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b4e4c1d6d8ddd79afddad2dbf4fbe0e79ae0c6d1d5c79ad3dbc2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88d8fdeae4e1eba6c1e6eee7c8c7dcdba6dcfaede9fba6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>) at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and OTS Northeast Regional Office, 
Harborside Financial Center, Plaza Five, Suite 1600, Jersey City, NJ 
07311.

    Dated: August 14, 2007.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans,
Legal Information Assistant.
[FR Doc. 07-4040 Filed 8-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Mr. Michael Jefferson

Vice President

Dynamic Airways, LLC

701 N Terminal SVC Road

Greensboro, NC 27409

Dear Mr. Jefferson:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§ 121.1117(e)(1), of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can 

not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your February 25, 2014, exemption request on behalf of Dynamic Airways, LLC 

(Dynamic) into the public docket (No. FAA-2014-0133), but we are unable to process your 

request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of

§ 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of 

the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

 The specific reasons why you need to exercise the privileges of your exemption outside 

the United States if applicable. 
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open during 

this period. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at 

least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 493-5260.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda D. Courtney

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure

§ 11.81
§ 215.13 Pre-departure inspection. ( a ) At each location where a freight car is placed in a train, the freight car shall be inspected before the train departs. This inspection may be made before or after the car is placed in the train.
( b ) At a location where an inspector designated under § 215.11 is on duty for the purpose of inspecting freight cars, the inspection required by paragraph (a) of this section shall be made by that inspector to determine whether the car is in compliance with this part.
( c ) At a location where a person designated under § 215.11 is not on duty for the purpose of inspecting freight cars, the inspection required by paragraph (a) shall, as a minimum, be made for those conditions set forth in appendix D to this part.
( d ) Performance of the inspection prescribed by this section does not relieve a railroad of its liability under § 215.7 for failure to comply with any other provision of this part.
[45 FR 26710, Apr. 21, 1980]
From: douvos@sbcglobal.net [mailto:douvos@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:49 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Angelo Douvos 

32 Clorinda Avenue 

San Rafael, CA 94901
§ 212.207 Signal and train control inspector. ( a ) The signal and train control inspector is required, at a minimum, to be able to conduct independent inspections of all types of signal and train control systems for the purpose of determining compliance with the Rules, Standards and Instructions for Railroad Signal Systems (49 CFR part 236), to make reports of those inspections, and to recommend the institution of enforcement actions when appropriate to promote compliance.
( b ) The signal and train inspector is required, at a minimum, to have at least four years of recent experience in signal construction or maintenance. A bachelor's degree in electrical engineering or a related technical specialization may be substituted for two of the four years of this experience requirement and successful completion of the apprentice training program may be substituted for the four years of this requirement.
( c ) The signal and train control inspector shall demonstrate the following specific qualifications: ( 1 ) A comprehensive knowledge of signal and train control systems, maintenance practices, test and inspection techniques;
( 2 ) The ability to understand and detect deviations from: ( i ) Signal and train control maintenance standards accepted in the industry; and
( ii ) The Rules, Standards and Instructions for Railroad Signal Systems (49 CFR part 236).
( 3 ) The ability to examine plans and records, to make inspections of signal train control systems and to determine adequacy of stopping distances from prescribed speeds;
( 4 ) Knowledge of operating practices and signal systems sufficient to understand the safety significance of deviations and combination of deviations; and
( 5 ) Specialized knowledge of the requirements of the Rules, Standards and Instructions for Railroad Signal Systems, including the remedial action required to bring signal and train control systems into compliance with the standards.
#### § 230.45 Method of testing.

Steam gauges shall be compared with an accurate test gauge or dead weight tester. While under test load at the MAWP of the boiler to which the gauge will be applied, the gauge shall be set to read that pressure as accurately as the physical limitations of the gauge will allow. Under test the gauge shall read within the manufacturer's tolerance at all points on the gauge up to 25 percent above the allowed pressure. If the manufacturer's tolerance is not known, the gauge must read within 2 percent full scale accuracy at all points on the gauge up to 25 percent above allowed pressure.
§ 238.123 Emergency roof access. Except as provided in § 238.441 of this chapter— ( a ) *Number and dimensions.* Each passenger car ordered on or after April 1, 2009, or placed in service for the first time on or after April 1, 2011, shall have a minimum of two emergency roof access locations, each with a minimum opening of 26 inches longitudinally (*i.e.*, parallel to the longitudinal axis of the car) by 24 inches laterally.
( b ) *Means of access.* Emergency roof access shall be provided by means of a hatch, or a conspicuously marked structural weak point in the roof for access by properly equipped emergency response personnel.
( c ) *Location.* Emergency roof access locations shall be situated as practical so that when a car is on its side— ( 1 ) One emergency access location is wholly within each half of the roof as divided top from bottom; and
( 2 ) One emergency access location is wholly within each half of the roof as divided left from right. (*See* Figure 3 to this subpart.)
( d ) *Obstructions.* The ceiling space below each emergency roof access location shall be free from wire, cabling, conduit, and piping. This space shall also be free of any rigid secondary structure (*e.g.*, a diffuser or diffuser support, lighting back fixture, mounted PA equipment, or luggage rack) where practicable. If emergency roof access is provided by means of a hatch, it shall be possible to push interior panels or liners out of their retention devices and into the interior of the vehicle after removing the hatch. If emergency roof access is provided by means of a structural weak point, it shall be permissible to cut through interior panels, liners, or other non-rigid secondary structures after making the cutout hole in the roof, provided any such additional cutting necessary to access the interior of the vehicle permits a minimum opening of the dimensions specified in paragraph (a) to be maintained.
( e ) *Marking and instructions.* ( 1 ) Prior to January 28, 2015, each emergency roof access location shall be conspicuously marked with retroreflective material of contrasting color. As further specified, legible and understandable instructions shall be posted at or near each such location. If emergency roof access is provided by means of a structural weak point— ( i ) The retroreflective material shall conspicuously mark the line along which the roof skin shall be cut; and
( ii ) A sign plate with a retroreflective border shall also state as follows: CAUTION—DO NOT USE FLAME CUTTING DEVICES CAUTION—WARN PASSENGERS BEFORE CUTTING CUT ALONG DASHED LINE TO GAIN ACCESS ROOF CONSTRUCTION—[STATE RELEVANT DETAILS]
( 2 ) On or after January 28, 2015, each emergency roof access location shall be marked, and instructions provided for its use, as specified in § 238.125.
[73 FR 6403, Feb. 1, 2008, as amended at 78 FR 71814, Nov. 29, 2013]
§ 211.1 General. ( a ) This part prescribes rules of practice that apply to rulemaking and waiver proceedings, review of emergency orders issued under 45 U.S.C. 432, and miscellaneous safety-related proceedings and informal safety inquiries. The specific time limits for disposition of proceedings apply only to proceedings initiated after December 31, 1976, under the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970 (45 U.S.C. 421 *et seq.*). When warranted, FRA will extend these time limits in individual proceedings. However, each proceeding under the Federal Railroad Safety Act shall be disposed of within 12 months after the date it is initiated. A proceeding shall be deemed to be initiated and the time period for its disposition shall begin on the date a petition or application that complies with the requirements of this chapter is received by the person designated in § 211.7.
( b ) As used in this part— ( 1 ) *Administrator* means the Federal Railroad Administrator or the Deputy Administrator or the delegate of either of them.
( 2 ) *Waiver* includes exemption.
( 3 ) *Safety Act* means the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970, as amended (45 U.S.C. 421 *et seq.*).
( 4 ) *Docket Clerk* means the Docket Clerk, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Mail Stop 10, Washington, DC 20590 or the Docket Clerk, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations (M-30), West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
( 5 ) *Railroad Safety Board* means the Railroad Safety Board, Office of Safety, Federal Railroad Administration, Washington, DC 20590.
( c ) Records relating to proceedings and inquiries subject to this part are available for inspection as provided in part 7 of this title.
[41 FR 54181, Dec. 13, 1976, as amended at 64 FR 70195, Dec. 16, 1999; 74 FR 25171, May 27, 2009]