alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 7, 1995 (111), Para 111.34 U. S. Merchant Marine Academy Board of Visitors]
[Page 1317]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.111.34  u. s. merchant marine academy board of visitors

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaHOOD, by unanimous consent, announced 
that pursuant to the provisions of section 1295b(h) of title 46, United 
States Code, the Speaker appointed to the Board of Visitors to the 
United States Merchant Marine Acedemy Messrs. King and Manton, on the 
part of the House.
  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate of the foregoing 
appointments.
```
#### § 236.60 Switch shunting circuit; use restricted.

Switch shunting circuit shall not be hereafter installed, except where tract or control circuit is opened by the circuit controller.

[49 FR 3384, Jan. 26, 1984]
Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David H. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Thomas L..
Redding, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David H. GillDavid H. Gill, President and C.E.O.(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Thomas L. ReddingThomas L. Redding C.F.O.(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


August 8, 2006
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 22, 2017

t0919

Order 

Clerk

September 22, 2017

155266

KENNETH BERTIN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 155266

COA: 328885 

Oakland CC: 2014-139901-NO

DOUGLAS MANN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On the order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 

2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule 

oral argument on whether to grant the application or to take other action. MCR 

7.305(H)(1). 

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this 

order addressing whether the reckless misconduct standard of care or the ordinary 

negligence standard of care applies to an injury resulting from the operation of a golf cart 

while playing golf recreationally. Ritchie-Gamester v City of Berkley, 461 Mich 73, 87-

89 (1999). In addition to the brief, the appellant shall electronically file an appendix 

containing the items listed at MCR 7.312(D)(2). The appellee shall file a supplemental 

brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. The appellee shall also 

electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use of the appendix 

filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within 14 days of 

being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements 

of their application papers. 

The Golf Association of Michigan and Negligence Law Section of the State Bar of 

Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in 

the determination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for permission 

to file briefs amicus curiae.
§ 191.15 Transmission systems; gathering systems; liquefied natural gas facilities; and underground natural gas storage facilities: Incident report. ( a ) *Pipeline systems* — ( 1 ) *Transmission, offshore gathering, or regulated onshore gathering.* Each operator of a transmission, offshore gathering, or a regulated onshore gathering pipeline system must submit Department of Transportation (DOT) Form PHMSA F 7100.2 as soon as practicable but not more than 30 days after detection of an incident required to be reported under § 191.5.
( 2 ) *Reporting-regulated gathering.* Each operator of a reporting-regulated gathering pipeline system must submit DOT Form PHMSA F 7100.2-2 as soon as practicable but not more than 30 days after detection of an incident required to be reported under § 191.5 that occurs after May 16, 2022.
( b ) *LNG.* Each operator of a liquefied natural gas plant or facility must submit DOT Form PHMSA F 7100.3 as soon as practicable but not more than 30 days after detection of an incident required to be reported under § 191.5 of this part.
( c ) *Underground natural gas storage facility.* Each operator of a UNGSF must submit DOT Form PHMSA F7100.2 as soon as practicable but not more than 30 days after the detection of an incident required to be reported under § 191.5.
( d ) *Supplemental report.* Where additional related information is obtained after an operator submits a report under paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of this section, the operator must make a supplemental report as soon as practicable, with a clear reference by date to the original report.
[75 FR 72905, Nov. 26, 2010; as amended by Amdt. 191-24, 81 FR 91871, Dec. 19, 2016; Amdt. 191-27, 85 FR 8125, Feb. 12, 2020; Amdt. 191-30, 86 FR 63295, Nov. 15, 2021; 87 FR 35677, June 13, 2022]
§ 29.534 What is the process for regulation waivers under this part? ( a ) A Tribe may request a waiver of a regulation in this part with respect to a compact or funding agreement. The Tribe must submit the request in writing to the Self-Governance Official to *ttsgp@dot.gov* or use any other method that provides receipt, at the following address: Self-Governance Official, U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary [INSERT MAIL CODE], 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. The request must be marked with the words “REQUEST TO WAIVE REGULATIONS” on the first page of the request and on the envelope enclosing the request (or in the subject line if by electronic mail). The request must identify the regulation subject to the waiver request, the language the Tribe seeks to waive, and the basis for the request.
( b ) Within 10 days of receipt of the waiver request, the Self-Governance Official will send the Tribe an acknowledgement of the waiver request, together with a date-stamped cover sheet that indicates the date on which the Department received the waiver request.
( c ) No later than 90 days after the date of receipt of a written request under paragraph (a) of this section, the Department must approve or deny the request in writing. If the application for a waiver is denied, the Department must provide the Tribe with the reasons for the denial as part of the written response.
( d ) The Department will consider the following factors in making its decision on a waiver request: ( 1 ) Whether the waiver is contrary to Federal law;
( 2 ) The extent to which the waiver provides flexibility to facilitate the implementation of the Program at the Tribal level consistent with the principles of self-governance;
( 3 ) The extent to which the Tribe will benefit from the waiver; and
( 4 ) Whether the waiver is consistent with Federal transportation policy.
( e ) If the Department does not approve or deny a request submitted under paragraph (a) of this section on or before the last day of the 90-day period, the request will be deemed approved by operation of law.
( f ) A decision by the Department on a waiver request is a final agency action subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act.
285 P.2d 802

#### Alex LULCHUCK, Employee, Claimant-Appellant, v. OHIO MATCH COMPANY, Employer, and Fireman’s Fund Indemnity Co., Surety, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 8227.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

June 28, 1955.

J. Ward Arney, Coeur d’Alene, for appellant.

H. J. Hull & Sons, Wallace, for respondents.

TAYLOR, Chief Justice.

The final award of the Industrial Accident Board was made and filed August 16, 1954. On September 15, 1954, claimant’s notice of appeal was deposited in the Post Office at Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, addressed to the Clerk of the Supreme Court at Boise, and was received and filed in the office of the clerk of this court on September 17, 1954, on the 32nd day after the making and filing of the final award. Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the notice was not filed within the time allowed by § 72-609 I.C.

Appellant urged that the mailing of the notice within the thirty day period constituted service under the provisions of §§ 12-502 and 12-503 I.C. Those sections deal only with service, whereas § 72-609 requires that the notice of appeal be *filed*within the thirty day period. Freeman v. Sunshine Mining Co., 75 Idaho 292, 271 P.2d 1022.

The appeal is dismissed.

PORTER, ANDERSON and SMITH, JJ., and SPEAR, District Judge, concur.
|EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Robert H. Young, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ Robert H. Young
Robert H. Young
Chief Executive Officer
March 11, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Central Vermont Public Service Corporation ("CVPS") and will be retained by CVPS and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements onForm S-8(Nos. 33-5456,33-38590,33-39374,33-53763,33-53899,33-801767,333-101767,333-116466,333-109359 and333-110726) of CLARCORInc. of our report dated February 6, 2006 relating to thefinancial statements, the financial statement schedule,management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, which appears in thisForm 10-K.     /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPLouisville, KentuckyFebruary 6, 2006
#### STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA EX REL. SVEINBJORN JOHNSON, Attorney General, Respondent, v. BEULAH COAL MINING COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation, Appellant.

(199 N. W. 133.)

This case is governed *by*the decision rendered in State ex rel. Johnson *v.*Hughes Electric Co. ante, 45.

Opinion filed May 21, 1924.

*78Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, *Coffey,*J.

Affirmed.

*O’Hare & Cox,*for appellant.

*Geo. F. Shafer,*Attorney General, and *Philip Elliott,*for respondent.

Per Curiam.

This case was argued and submitted at the same time .as State ex rel. Johnson v. Hughes Electric Co. ante, 45, 199 N. W. 128. The cases were, for purposes of trial, consolidated in the lower •court and were briefed and argued together in this court and it was agreed that the one decision might govern both cases.

The principal and controlling facts are identical with those in the case of State ex rel. Johnson v. Hughes Electric Company, and on the authority of that case, the judgment of the district court is affirmed..

Bronson, Ch. J., and Christianson, Birdzell, and Nuessle, JJ., and Buttz, Dist. J., concur.

Mr. Justice Johnson, disqualified, did not participate; Honorable O. W. Buttz, Judge of the Second Judicial District, sitting in his stead.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 195](/current/title-49/part-195?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at [71 FR 33409](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/71-FR-33409), June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.248 Cover over buried pipeline.

(a) Unless specifically exempted in this subpart, all pipe must be buried so that it is below the level of cultivation. Except as provided in [paragraph (b)](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-195.248#p-195.248(b)) of this section, the pipe must be installed so that the cover between the top of the pipe and the ground level, road bed, river bottom, or underwater natural bottom (as determined by recognized and generally accepted practices), as applicable, complies with the following table:

| Location | Cover inches (millimeters) | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| For normal excavation | For rock excavation1 |
| Industrial, commercial, and residential areas | 36 (914) | 30 (762) |
| Crossing of inland bodies of water with a width of at least 100 feet (30.5 meters) from high water mark to high water mark | 48 (1219) | 18 (457) |
| Drainage ditches at public roads and railroads | 36 (914) | 36 (914) |
| Deepwater port safety zones | 48 (1219) | 24 (610) |
| Gulf of Mexico and its inlets in waters less than 15 feet (4.6 meters) deep as measured from mean low water | 36 (914) | 18 (457) |
| Other offshore areas under water less than 12 ft (3.7 meters) deep as measured from mean low water | 36 (914) | 18 (457) |
| Any other area | 30 (762) | 18 (457) |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Rock excavation is any excavation that requires blasting or removal by equivalent means. | | |

(b) Except for the Gulf of Mexico and its inlets in waters less than 15 feet (4.6 meters) deep, less cover than the minimum required by [paragraph (a)](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-195.248#p-195.248(a)) of this section and [§ 195.210](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-195.210) may be used if—

(1) It is impracticable to comply with the minimum cover requirements; and

(2) Additional protection is provided that is equivalent to the minimum required cover.

[Amdt. 195-22, [46 FR 38360](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/46-FR-38360), July 27, 1981; [47 FR 32721](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/47-FR-32721), July 29, 1982, as amended by Amdt. 195-52, [59 FR 33397](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/59-FR-33397), June 28, 1994; [59 FR 36256](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/59-FR-36256), July 15, 1994; Amdt. 195-63, [63 FR 37506](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/63-FR-37506), July 13, 1998; Amdt. 195-95, [69 FR 48407](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/69-FR-48407), Aug. 10, 2004; Amdt. 195-101, [82 FR 7999](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/82-FR-7999), Jan. 23, 2017]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, March 24, 1995 (50), Para 50.9 Clerk to Correct Engrossment]
[Page 504]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.50.9  clerk to correct engrossment

  On motion of Mr. ARCHER, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That in the engrossment of the foregoing bill, the Clerk be 
authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, cross references, 
and to make other technical corrections.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: t.nesbitthanson@yahoo.com [mailto:t.nesbitthanson@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:30 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Toni Nesbitt-Hanson 

123 PR 367 

Oakwood, TX 75855
§ 234.253 Flashing light units and lamp voltage. ( a ) Each flashing light unit shall be inspected when installed and at least once every twelve months for proper alignment and frequency of flashes in accordance with installation specifications.
( b ) Lamp voltage shall be tested when installed and at least once every 12 months thereafter.
( c ) Each flashing light unit shall be inspected for proper visibility, dirt and damage to roundels and reflectors at least once each month.
Editorial Note on Part 193
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

§ 193.2715 Training: security. ( a ) Personnel responsible for security at an LNG plant must be trained in accordance with a written plan of initial instruction to: ( 1 ) Recognize breaches of security;
( 2 ) Carry out the security procedures under § 193.2903 that relate to their assigned duties;
( 3 ) Be familiar with basic plant operations and emergency procedures, as necessary to effectively perform their assigned duties; and
( 4 ) Recognize conditions where security assistance is needed.
( b ) A written plan of continuing instruction must be conducted at intervals of not more than two years to keep all personnel having security duties current on the knowledge and skills they gained in the program of initial instruction.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Clark H. Hammond, as Corporation Counsel of the City of Buffalo, Appellant, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against George A. Ricker et al., Constituting the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of Buffalo, et al., Respondents.

*Matter of Hammond*v. *Ricker,*140 App. Div. 19, affirmed.

(Argued November 21, 1910;

decided December 6, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 12, 1910, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendants to reclassify the position of stenographer in the department of law in the city of Buffalo by placing it in the exempt class.

*Clark H. Hammond*and *Harry D. Sanders*for appellant.

*Adelbert Moot, John W. Ryan*and *Ansley Wilcox*for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the state board of civil service commissioners was a necessary party to a proceeding to compel a reclassification under the Civil Service Law, without passing on the merits; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ. Absent: Gray, J.
EXHIBIT 21





                             FIRSTENERGY CORP.

                  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                           AT DECEMBER 31, 2000


Ohio Edison Company - Incorporated in Ohio

The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company - Incorporated in Ohio

The Toledo Edison Company - Incorporated in Ohio

Centerior Service Company - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Properties Company - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Ventures Corporation - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Facilities Services Group, LLC - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Securities Transfer Company - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Services Corp. - Incorporated in Ohio

MARBEL Energy Corporation - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company - Incorporated in Ohio

FirstEnergy Holdings, LLC - Incorporated in Ohio

FE Acquisition Corp. - Incorporated in Ohio

American Transmission Systems, Inc. - Incorporated in Ohio

FELHC, Inc. - Incorporated in Ohio


                        Statement of Differences
                        ------------------------

Exhibit Number 21, List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant at December 31,
2000, is not included in the printed document.
Exhibit 3.2
    
 
  
     1




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



9




---



##### 



10




---



##### 



11




---



##### 



12




---



##### 



13




---



##### 



14




---



##### 



15




---



##### 



Generally
 16




---



##### 



17




---



##### 



18




---



##### 



19




---



##### 



20




---



##### 



21




---



##### 



22




---



##### 



23




---



##### 



24




---



##### 



25
#### Ira H. Storrs, *Appellant, v.*The Congregational Church, etc., *Respondent.*

Judgment reversed; new trial granted. Beferee' discharged, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Boardman, J;