alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 51839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4432]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Open Systemc Initiative

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 21, 2007, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Open SystemC Initiative 
(``OSCI'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, CoFlunt Design, Nantes, France; and University Pierre et 
Marie Curie, Paris, France have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and OSCI intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On October 9, 2001, OSCI filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
January 3, 2002 (67 FR 350).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 19, 
2007. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act on May 7, 2007 (72 FR 25782).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-4432 Filed 9-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 128 (Thursday, July 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36650-36651]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3252]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Hood/Willamette Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Action of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Hood/Willamette Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will 
meet on Thursday, August 30, 2007. The meeting is scheduled to begin at 
9:30 a.m. and will conclude at approximately 12:30 p.m. The meeting 
will be held at Salem Office of the Bureau of Land Management Office; 
1717 Fabry Road SE., Salem, Oregon; (503) 375-5646. The tentative 
agenda includes: (1) Report on status of past projects; (2) Election of 
chairperson; (3) Decision on overhead rate for 2008 projects; (4) 
Presentation of 2008 Projects; and (5) Public Forum.
    The Public Forum is tentatively scheduled to begin at 9:45 a.m. 
Time allotted for individual presentations will be limited to 3-4 
minutes. Written comments are encouraged, particularly if the material 
cannot be presented within the time limits for the Public Forum. 
Written comments may be

[[Page 36651]]

submitted prior to the August 30th meeting by sending them to Joanne 
West at the address given below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information regarding this 
meeting, contact Joanne West; Sweet Home Ranger District; 4431 Highway 
20; Sweet Home, Oregon 97386; (541) 367-3546.

    Dated: June 26, 2007.
Dallas J. Emch,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07-3252 Filed 7-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
-----Original Message----- 

From: susanw@bocafed.org [mailto:susanw@bocafed.org] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:48 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Susan Weinstock 

8347 Boca Glades Blvd E 

Boca Raton, FL 33434
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, October 30, 1995 (136), Para 136.8 Coastal Barrier System Map Correction]
[Pages 1799-1800]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.136.8  coastal barrier system map correction

  Mr. TORKILDSEN moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 
2005) to direct the Secretary of the Interior to make technical 
corrections in maps relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, recognized Mr. TORKILDSEN and 
Mr. STUDDS, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and 
said bill was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.

[[Page 1800]]
```
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1996
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1996
[CASH]                                           4,555
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                   25,237
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                     23,502
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                63,000
[PP&E]                                          12,701
[DEPRECIATION]                                       0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                  91,403
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                           21,133
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                           324
[OTHER-SE]                                           0
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                    91,403
[SALES]                                         82,608
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                     0
[CGS]                                           39,941
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                   27,602
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                               1,666
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                 13,399
[INCOME-TAX]                                     4,745
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                                  0
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                     8,654
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                     0.27
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, September 12, 1995 (113), Para 113.25 H.R. 2150--Unfinished Business]
[Page 1327]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.113.25  h.r. 2150--unfinished business

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. DICKEY, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced the unfinished business to be the motion to suspend the rules 
and pass the bill (H.R. 2150) to amend the Small Business Act and the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958 to reduce the cost to the Federal 
Government of guaranteeing certain loans and debentures, and for other 
purposes; as amended.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill, as amended?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. DICKEY, announced that two-thirds of 
those present had voted in the affirmative.
  Mr. POSHARD demanded a recorded vote on the motion to suspend the 
rules and pass said bill, as amended, which demand was supported by one-
fifth of a quorum, so a recorded vote was ordered.
  The vote was taken by electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

405

affirmative

Nays

0
```
§ 222.5 What railroads does this regulation apply to? This part applies to all railroads except: ( a ) A railroad that exclusively operates freight trains only on track which is not part of the general railroad system of transportation;
( b ) Passenger railroads that operate only on track which is not part of the general railroad system of transportation and that operate at a maximum speed of 15 miles per hour over public highway-rail grade crossings; and
( c ) Rapid transit operations within an urban area that are not connected to the general railroad system of transportation. See 49 CFR part 209, appendix A for the definitive statement of the meaning of the preceding sentence.
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------



     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") by Applied Spectrum Technologies,
Inc. ("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.




Date:  May 12, 2005                          /s/ Mark R. Littell
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Mark R. Littell
                                             Chief Executive Officer



                                             /s/ Mark R. Littell
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Mark R. Littell
                                             Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-293-CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLANT

V.

JOSEPH T. REED APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 30TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION

1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss For Mootness.” It

is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss

the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); State Farm Mut. Auto Ins.

Co. v. Smith, No. 02-03-00046-CV, 2003 WL 22071455, at * 1 (Tex.

App.—Fort Worth Aug. 29, 2003, no pet.)(mem. op.).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: November 25, 2009

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

49–011 2005

109th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 109–60 

NOTIFICATION TO ENTER INTO A FREE TRADE 

AGREEMENT WITH THE SULTANATE OF OMAN 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ENTER INTO A FREE TRADE AGREEMENT WITH THE SULTANATE OF OMAN, IN ACCORDANCE WITH 

SECTION 2105(a)(1)(A) OF THE TRADE ACT OF 2002 (PUB. L. 107– 

210), PURSUANT TO 19 U.S.C. 2112(e)(1) 

OCTOBER 18, 2005.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means and ordered to be printed 


E:\Seals\Congress.#13
(1) 

To the Congress of the United States: 

Consistent with section 2105(a)(1)(A) of the Trade Act of 2002, 

(Public Law 107–210) (the ‘‘Trade Act’’), I am pleased to notify the 

Congress of my intention to enter into a Free Trade Agreement 

(FTA) with the Sultanate of Oman. 

The Agreement will generate export opportunities for U.S. companies, farmers, and ranchers, help create jobs in the United 

States, and help American consumers save money while offering 

them more choices. Entering into an FTA with Oman will build on 

the FTAs that we already have with Israel, Jordan, and Morocco, 

as well as the FTA that we have concluded with Bahrain, and will 

be an important step on the path to fulfilling my vision of developing economic growth and democracy in the Middle East and creating a U.S.-Middle East Free Trade Area (MEFTA) by 2013. 

Consistent with the Trade Act, I am sending this notification at 

least 90 days in advance of signing the FTA. My Administration 

looks forward to working with the Congress in developing appropriate legislation to approve and implement this Agreement. 

GEORGE W. BUSH. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, October 17, 2005. 

Æ
#### § 230.99 Tender truck axles.

The minimum diameters of axles for various axle loads shall be as follows:

| Axle load (in pounds) | Minimum diameter of journal (in inches) | Minimum diameter of wheel seat (in inches) | Minimum diameter of center (in inches) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 50000 | 51/2 | 73/8 | 67/16 |
| 38000 | 5 | 63/4 | 57/8 |
| 31000 | 41/2 | 61/4 | 55/16 |
| 22000 | 33/4 | 5 | 43/8 |
| 15000 | 31/4 | 45/8 | 37/8 |
AMENDMENT NO. 2
                                       TO
                   1992 PERFORMANCE AND EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
                                       OF
                                MOTO PHOTO, INC.
                      (AS ADOPTED EFFECTIVE APRIL 3, 1998)


A.On April 20, 1992, the Board of Directors of Moto Photo, Inc., a Delaware
  corporation (the ``Corporation''), adopted and on July 15, 1992, the
  shareholders approved, the Corporation's 1992 Performance and Equity
  Incentive Plan (the ``Plan'').  The Board of Directors has the authority
  pursuant to Section 17 of the Plan to amend the Plan from time to time and
  deems it desirable and in the best interests of the Corporation to amend the
  Plan to increase the number of shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance
  for all purposes under the Plan and to add non-employee directors as eligible
  participants under the Plan.

B.The amendment of the Plan set forth herein shall be conditioned upon, and is
  subject in all respects to, the approval of the shareholders of the
  Corporation as required under Section 17 of the Plan.  If such approval is
  not obtained, this amendment shall be of no further force or effect.

     NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan be amended as follows:

     1.The first paragraph of Section 4(b) of the Plan is hereby amended to
       read in its entirety as follows:

       ``The maximum number of shares of Common Stock in respect of which
       Awards may be granted under the Plan, subject to adjustment as provided
       in Section 15 of the Plan, is 2,000,000 shares.

     2.Section 5 of the Plan is hereby amended to add an additional paragraph
       thereunder to read in its entirety as follows:

       ``Non-employee directors of the Corporation shall also be eligible for
       Awards under the Plan and any reference in the Plan to a requirement
       based on the employment of a Participant shall be deemed to refer to
       continued service as a director by a director who becomes a
#### § 211.61 Informal safety inquiries.

The Administrator may conduct informal safety inquiries to collect information on selected topics relating to railroad safety. A notice of each such inquiry will be published in the Federal Register outlining the area of inquiry and inviting interested persons to assist by submitting written material or participating in informal public conferences and discussions. Upon completion of the inquiry, the Administrator will review the information obtained and may, on his own motion, initiate a rulemaking proceeding under § 211.13 or take whatever other action he deems appropriate.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2345 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2345

                    For the relief of Matt Clawson.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 1995

  Mr. Crapo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of Matt Clawson.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELIEF.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of 
funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum of $87,674 to 
Mr. Clawson in full settlement of a claim against the United States for 
losses incurred as a result of his good faith reliance on the approval 
of the Forest Service of his claim for a placer mine of approximately 
20 acres outside the wilderness area and above the ordinary high water 
mark of the Middle Fork of the Salmon River in Idaho.
    (b) Limitation.--Not more than 10 percent of the amount made 
available under subsection (a) shall be paid or delivered to or 
received by any agent or attorney on account of service rendered in 
connection with the claim, any contract to the contrary 
notwithstanding. Violation of this subsection is a misdemeanor 
punishable by a fine not to exceed $10,000.
                                 <all>
```
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. A R T U R O G A L L E G O S - D I A Z , a . k. a . A l a qui n and N ahum C opa do- N i e t o, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 09- 30074 D. C. No . 2 : 0 8 - c r - 0 0 1 4 4 - J LR

ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on J a m e s L . R obart , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2010 ** B e f o r e : R Y M E R , M c K E O W N , an dP A E Z , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . A rtur o G a l l e gos - D i a z appe a l s f r om hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on and 216- m onth s e nt e nc e f

orc ons pi r a c yt o di s tr i but e m e tha m phe t a m i ne , i n vi ol a t i on of 

# FI LED APR15 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 30074 2 2 1 U .S .C . § § 8 4 1 ( a ) ( 1 ) , ( b ) ( 1 ) ( A ) a n d8 4 6 . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n p u r s u an t to 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 , an dw e a f f irm . P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 3 8 6 U .S . 7 3 8 (1 9 6 7 ), G alleg o s- D iaz’s c ouns e l ha s f

i l e d abr i e f

s t a t i ng the r e a r e no gr ounds f orr e l i e f , a l ong w i th am ot i on t o w i thdr aw a s c ouns e l of r e c or d. W e ha ve c ons i de r e d the c l a i m s r a i s e d by G al l egos-D i az ’ s pro se l ett ersubm i tt ed on June 19 , 20 09 . N o answ er i ng bri ef has be e n f i l e d. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 - 8 1 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. A cco rd i n g l y, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , G alleg o s- D iaz’s r e que s tf orappoi ntm e ntof

ne w c ouns e l i s de ni e d, a nd the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nt i s AF F I RME D.
§ 29.527 What compliance with environmental and cultural resource statutes is required? ( a ) The Department must meet the requirements of applicable Federal environmental and cultural resource laws, such as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act, for a proposed project under the Program.
( b ) The Secretary has delegated environmental and cultural resource compliance responsibilities to the Operating Administrations, as appropriate. As such, an Operating Administration will serve as the lead agency responsible for final review and approval of environmental documents, and any associated environmental determinations and findings for a proposed project under the Program. The Secretary, as delegated to the Operating Administrations, is also responsible for making determinations and issuing approvals in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 138 and 49 U.S.C. 303 (Section 4(f)), as applicable. Tribes may consult with the Self-Governance Official to determine which Operating Administration should serve as the lead agency.
( c ) If the Department is conducting the environmental review process for a proposed project under the Program, the Tribe must assist the Department to satisfy the requirements of applicable Federal environmental and cultural resource laws.
( d ) A Tribe may manage or conduct the environmental review process for a proposed project under the Program and may prepare drafts of the appropriate environmental review documents for submission to the Department. ( 1 ) A Tribe may follow its own environmental review procedures if the procedures and documentation also satisfy the Federal environmental review requirements applicable to the project. A Tribe should work with the Operating Administration serving as lead agency to ensure the Tribal process will satisfy all applicable Federal environmental review requirements.
( 2 ) The Operating Administration serving as lead agency must determine that the Tribe's process and documentation satisfy the applicable Federal environmental review requirements.
( e ) As resources permit and at the request of a Tribe, the Department will provide advice and technical assistance to the Tribe to assist in the management of the Federal environmental review process and preparation of environmental documents.
( f ) Unless prohibited by law, a Tribe may use funds included in a funding agreement to pay for environmental review activities.