alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49265-49266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4209]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[No. DOD-2007-HA-0023]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by 
September 27, 2007.
    Title, Associated Form and OMB Number: Professional Qualifications 
Medical/Peer Reviewers; CHAMPUS Form 780; OMB Control Number 0720-0005.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 60.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 60.
    Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 15.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
to obtain and record the professional qualifications of medical and 
peer reviewers utilized within TRICARE. The form is included as an 
exhibit in an appeal or hearing case file as evidence of the reviewer's 
professional qualifications to review the medical documentation 
contained in the case file.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit; individuals or 
households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. John Kraemer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed

[[Page 49266]]

information collection should be sent to Mr. Kraemer at the Office of 
Management and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive 
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: August 22, 2007.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-4209 Filed 8-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
#### Michael Kelly, as Administrator of the Estate of Michael J. Kelly, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

*Kelly*v. *N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co.,*136 App. Div. 906, affirmed.

(Argued January 12, 1911;

decided January 27, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 10, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned by the defendant’s negligence.

*Hugh E. Rourke*for appellant.

*Hamilton Ward*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Werner and Hiscock, JJ. Dissenting: Haight and Collin, JJ.
NUMBER 13-14-00278-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

TIC ENERGY AND CHEMICAL, INC., Appellant,

v.

KEVIN BRADFORD MARTIN, Appellee.

On Petition for Interlocutory Appeal from the

135th District Court of Calhoun County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza and Benavides

Order Per Curiam

TIC Energy and Chemical, Inc. filed a petition for permissive interlocutory appeal 

on May 15, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3. The Court, having examined and fully 

considered the petition, is of the opinion that the petition should be granted. Accordingly, 

we GRANT permission to appeal. A notice of appeal is deemed to have been filed on 

this date. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3(k). The appeal will be governed by the rules for 
2

accelerated appeals. Id.; see TEX. R. APP. P. 28.1 (“The deadlines and procedures for 

filing the record and briefs in an accelerated appeal are provided in Rules 35.1 and 38.6.”).

We direct the Clerk of this Court to file a copy of this order with the trial court clerk. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3(k).

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

29th day of July, 2014.
§ 210.33 Operation standards (switcher locomotives, load cell test stands, car coupling operations, and retarders). ( a ) Measurement on receiving property of the noise emission levels from switcher locomotives, load cell test stands, car coupling operations, and retarders shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR part 201 and § 210.25 of this part.
( b ) These sources shall be considered in noncompliance whenever the test measurement, minus the appropriate tolerance (§ 210.25), exceeds the noise emission levels prescribed in appendix A of this part.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, August 4, 1995 (109), Para 109.46 Private Bills and Resolutions]
[Pages 1298-1299]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.109.46  private bills and resolutions

  Under clause 1 of rule XXII, private bills and resolutions were 
introduced and severally referred as follows:

           By Mr. GILCHREST:
       H.R. 2257. A bill to clear certain impediments to the 
     licensing of a vessel for employment in the coastwise trade 
     and fisheries of the United States; to the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure.
           By Mr. ZELIFF:
       H.R. 2258. A bill to authorize the Secretary of 
     Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with 
     appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade

[[Page 1299]]

     for the vessel Raffles Light; to the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure.
```
August 14, 2014 

Subject: Request for Exemption from Regulation 14 CFR Part 45.13(a)(4) 

Reference: Same request dated November 7, 2013 

In addition to the information provided in the November 7, 2013 exemption request, we offer the 

following clarification. 

We believe that implementing 14 CFR Part 45.13(a)(4) will cause confusion and increase cost without 

having a negative effect on flight safety. This is discussed in the reference letter. 

We also believe this requirement will increase the cost of the product as it will require additional 

equipment and programming to design and implement the proper stamping in the space provided. 

We are not aware of any negative effect on flight safety due to the absence of a TC number being stamped 

on the blade butt. The practice of not marking a propeller TC number on a blade butt has existed for a 

half-century or more at Hartzell Propeller Inc. and it has never been considered a flight safety concern. 

Please approve this exemption request. 

Regards, 

Richard L. Edinger 

VP Certification and Flight Safety 

Lead ODA administrator 

Hartzell Propeller Inc. 

937-214-6544 (cell) 

Telephone: 937.778.4200 Fax: 937.778-4365

Hartzell Propeller Inc. 

One Propeller Place 

Piqua, OH 45356-2634 USA 

Tel: +1-937-778-4200 

Fax: +1-937-778-4271 

www.hartzellprop.com
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 158 (Thursday, August 16, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 46137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4055]



[[Page 46135]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part II





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Notice of August 15, 2007--Continuation of Emergency Regarding Export 
Control Regulations


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 158 / Thursday, August 16, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 46137]]

                Notice of August 15, 2007

                
Continuation of Emergency Regarding Export 
                Control Regulations

                On August 17, 2001, consistent with the authority 
                provided to me under the International Emergency 
                Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 170l et seq.), I issued 
                Executive Order 13222. In that order, I declared a 
                national emergency with respect to the unusual and 
                extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign 
                policy, and economy of the United States in light of 
                the expiration of the Export Administration Act of 
                1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2401 et seq.). Because 
                the Export Administration Act has not been renewed by 
                the Congress, the national emergency declared on August 
                17, 2001, must continue in effect beyond August 17, 
                2007. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of 
                the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am 
                continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared 
                in Executive Order 13222.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress. 
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    August 15, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-4055
Filed 8-15-07; 11:01 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
#### Isaac W. Bennett, Respondent, v. The Agricultural Insurance Company, Appellant.

Judment affirmed. Opinion by

Follett, J.
-----Original Message----- 

From: tamaramenteer@yahoo.com [mailto:tamaramenteer@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 7:47 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Tamara Menteer Gonzalez 

11709 24th Avenue NE 

Seattle, WA 98125
From: nancytmcc@aol.com [mailto:nancytmcc@aol.com] 

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 5:56 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Parity for Neurofeedback Treatment

To Whom it May Concern: 

I am a psychologist who provides neurofeedback treatment to individuals with Attention Deficit 

Hyperactivity Disorder and Mood Disorders. Neurofeedback is an empirically validated and 

widely recognized effective non-medication treatment for ADHD, as well as other conditions. 

There are over 50 studies evaluating the effectiveness of neurofeedback in the treatment of 

ADHD, substance use disorders and Autism. A recent review of this literature concluded 

"Neurofeedback meets the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry criteria for 

Clinical Guidelines for treatment of ADHD." This means that neurofeedback meets the same 

criteria as medication for treating ADHD, of which 60% of prescriptions are in fact prescribed 

"off label," and that neurofeedback "should always be considered as an intervention for this 

disorder by the clinician." 

 

This service has been denied by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, United Behavioral Health, Blue Cross, 

Cigna, and Amerigroup. 

 

This is limitation of an effective and validated treatment for a mental health problem. The 

reasons given by the insurance companies for this denial fell into two categories: 1) our 

company does not cover biofeedback for mental health problems or 2) there is not yet 

sufficient evidence for the efficacy of neurofeedback. As such, they are using evidence-based 

criteria that are far more restrictive for mental health services than the criteria which are used 

for medical/surgical services. There are many routine medical and surgical procedures which 

have far fewer controlled studies about their efficacy than does neurofeedback. These medical 

and surgical procedures are generally not limited because of concerns about how many 

controlled studies have been performed about them. 

 We believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity statute should 

require that employers and plans pay for the same range and scope of services for behavioral 

treatments as they do for medical surgical benefits and that a plan cannot be more restrictive 

in their managed care criteria and reviews for mental health and substance abuse disorders 

when compared to medical surgery. Today plans are being more restrictive in how they review 

evidenced-based mental health and Substance Abuse Treatments when compared to medical 

surgical treatments. This violates both the intent and letter of the parity statute and we hope 

that the regulations will clarify that this can't continue. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

Most sincerely, 

Nancy T. McCarel, Ph.D., BCIAC 

987 Old Eagle School Rd., Suite 719 

Wayne, PA 19087 

610-971-2277

Just Two? Get Easy to Make Recipes. Sign Up - Free Email Newsletter.
From: Matthew Atkinson [mailto:matthew.atkinson83@gmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 12:37 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Comment Regarding RIN 1210-AB32

I have become increasingly concerned that the Department of Labor's (DOL) proposed 

retirement rule will limit my right to pick and choose a financial professional who fits my budget 

and needs. This choice should be mine.

Thank you for your time,

Matthew Atkinson
§ 209.201 Compliance orders generally. ( a ) This subpart prescribes rules of procedure leading to the issuance of compliance orders pursuant to the Federal railroad safety laws at 49 U.S.C. 5121(a) and/or 20111(b).
( b ) The FRA may commence a proceeding under this subpart when FRA has reason to believe that a person is engaging in conduct or a pattern of conduct that involves one or more violations of the Federal railroad safety laws or any regulation or order issued under those laws for which FRA exercises enforcement authority.
[61 FR 38647, July 25, 1996]
From: Tom & Eileen Giancarlo [mailto:team108@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 10:42 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: mental health parity

I strongly support the Wellstone-Domenici Mental Health Parity Act. Individuals with 

mental illness or substance abuse problems can live productive, satisfying lives, if 

they have access to proper medical treatment. With this treatment, these individuals 

can dramatically improve their quality of life and their functional ability. The 

resulting improvement will save the insurance companies money in the long run and 

will benefit our entire society. Mental illness and substance abuse are treatable 

disorders. The treatment needs to be fairly funded by insurance. 

EileenM. Giancarlo, LCSW
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, W. Thomas Grant II, certify that: 

1.) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of LabOne, Inc.; 

2.) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.) The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

a.) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

b.) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c.) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.) The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors; 

a.) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b.) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

 

 

Date: March 12, 2004
By  /s/ *W. Thomas Grant II*
W. Thomas Grant II, Chairman of the Board,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          18,219
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             382
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    126,166
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          35,236
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            35,744
<LOANS>                                        292,603
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,260
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 490,601
<DEPOSITS>                                     391,546
<SHORT-TERM>                                    19,609
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,959
<LONG-TERM>                                     34,283
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,046
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 490,601
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,354
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,941
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    11
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,306
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,333
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,018
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,288
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      186
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 102
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,377
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,641
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,641
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.00
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.00
<LOANS-NON>                                        674
<LOANS-PAST>                                        18
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,069
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,130
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      136
<RECOVERIES>                                        80
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,260
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,023
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,237
        

</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: mendozason@hotmail.com [mailto:mendozason@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 6:41 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 01, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Steve Mendoza 

PO Box 406 

Cardiff, CA 92007