alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TIMELINE FOR TP132

Date Description 11/1/11 Payload for shipment # OR11009 authorized for loading and shipment to

WIPP

. 11/8/11 TP132 received at WIPP (Shipment # OR11009) per WP

- 08

- NT3020

. 11/9/11 Initiated TP132 processing per WP

- 05WH1011. RadCon Swipe on R adiological

A ssessment F ilter (RAF) tool and RAF air filter initially had elevated alpha counts, and then decayed to below limits. 11/10/11 Waste processing resumes per WP

- 05

- WH1011 and WP

- 12

- HP 1100 . Swipes

from bottom of TP payload pallet had elevated alpha and beta activity. Swipes decay below limits for alpha; remain elevated for beta. Area posted as Contamination Area (CA) per WP

- 12

- HP1500

. Initial discussions regarding potential options fo r payload (download/return ship, etc.) pending additional information including sample analysis. Plastic wrap secured over suspected contamination areas of the payload pallet and payload slipsheets. Facility pallet containing TP132 payload placed in Shield ed Storage Room (SSR). SSR posted as CA. WIPP Lab analysis requested. 11/1 1

- 16/11 Preliminary d iscussion s between WIPP lab and WTS Operations regarding lab

samples and analysi s. D iscussion s between WTS Operations, WTS CCP and ORNL regarding payload and waste stream . Initial WIPP lab analysis fo r Pu241, Am241, and other isotopes ( Tc99, Ni63, Sr90 ) determined they were not present , confirming no loss of containment of the payload. ORNL indicated history w i th th is waste stream similar to elevated swipes for beta identified at WIPP. Indications are that the source of beta contamination is from the radon decay chain and that there is no loss of containment. Discussions between WTS Op eration s and ORNL to check sli p sheets for potential contamination to rule out contamination transfer from transshipment of slipsheets; no evidence of contamination with slipsheets. 11/17/11 Conducted conference call summary and overview of lab results to date and

recommended path for ward

. 11/22/11 CBFO Interim Manager briefed on TP 132 status

. Expectations for

performance of work package will mostly likely occur after the Thanksgiving Holiday. 12/1/11 WTS / CBFO Management evaluate disposition options and recommend

wrap/emplace option, pending discussion with CBFO Interim Manager on 12/5. 12/5/11 WTS/CBFO personnel brief CBFO Interim Man ager via review of data and WTS

path forward to wrap/emplace payload. Direction provided to WTS WH Manager to proceed with execution of WO#11125 76C, as staffing allows, ensuring participation of the individuals involved with planning and development of the W ork O rder

. 12/6/11 Payload OR110009/TP132 wrapped and WO#1112576C completed through

step 8.2.15. 12/7/11 Downloaded pallet with payload OR11 0009/TP132 per WO# 1112576C

.

Payload OR110009 emplaced in Panel 6, Room 6, Row 41, Column 5.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Thrift Supervision

          - [AC-14: OTS No. H4431] 

                    Notice is hereby given that on August 10, 2007, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) approved the application of North Penn Mutual Holding Company and North Penn Bank, Scranton, Pennsylvania, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available for inspection by appointment (phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail:                     *Public.Info@OTS.Treas.gov*) at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and OTS Northeast Regional Office, Harborside Financial Center, Plaza Five, Suite 1600, Jersey City, NJ 07311.                

Dated: August 14, 2007.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Sandra E. Evans,

Legal Information Assistant.

[FR Doc. 07-4040  Filed 8-17-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
#### § 230.76 Piston travel.

(a) *Minimum piston travel.* The minimum piston travel shall be sufficient to provide proper brake shoe clearance when the brakes are released.

(b) *Maximum piston travel.* The maximum piston travel when steam locomotive is standing shall be as follows:

| Type of wheel brake | Maximum piston travel (in inches) |
| --- | --- |
| Cam Type Driving Wheel Brake | 31/2 |
| Other forms of Driving Wheel Brake | 6 |
| Engine Truck Brake | 8 |
| Tender Brake | 9 |
From: Jon Frederick, Ph.D. [mailto:psyphy@comcast.net] 

Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 3:59 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comments Regarding Regulatory Guidance USCG-2007-27022

Comments Regarding Regulatory Guidance USCG-2007-27022 

page 19157, II B specific areas 1 and 4 

 

I am a BCIA certified neurofeedback therapist who provides neurofeedback treatment to 

individuals with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Mood Disorders. Neurofeedback is 

an empirically validated and widely recognized effective non-medication treatment for ADHD, 

as well as other conditions. There are over 50 studies evaluating the effectiveness of 

neurofeedback in the treatment of ADHD, substance use disorders and Autism. A recent review 

of this literature concluded "Neurofeedback meets the American Academy of Child and 

Adolescent Psychiatry criteria for Clinical Guidelines for treatment of ADHD." This means that 

neurofeedback meets the same criteria as medication for treating ADHD, of which 60% of 

prescriptions are in fact prescribed "off label," and that neurofeedback "should always be 

considered as an intervention for this disorder by the clinician." 

 

This service has been denied by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, United Behavioral Health, Blue Cross, 

Cigna, and Amerigroup. 

 

This is limitation of an effective and validated treatment for a mental health problem. The 

reasons given by the insurance companies for this denial fell into two categories: 1) our 

company does not cover biofeedback for mental health problems or 2) there is not yet 

sufficient evidence for the efficacy of neurofeedback. As such, they are using evidence-based 

criteria that are far more restrictive for mental health services than the criteria which are used 

for medical/surgical services. There are many routine medical and surgical procedures which 

have far fewer controlled studies about their efficacy than does neurofeedback. These medical 

and surgical procedures are generally not limited because of concerns about how many 

controlled studies have been performed about them. 

 We believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity statute should 

require that employers and plans pay for the same range and scope of services for behavioral 

treatments as they do for medical surgical benefits and that a plan cannot be more restrictive 

in their managed care criteria and reviews for mental health and substance abuse disorders 

when compared to medical surgery. Today plans are being more restrictive in how they review 

evidenced-based mental health and Substance Abuse Treatments when compared to medical 

surgical treatments. This violates both the intent and letter of the parity statute and we hope 

that the regulations will clarify that this can't continue. 

Jon Frederick, Ph.D. 

300 North Essex #110A 

Narberth, PA 19072
# EUR-Lex - 52003XC0416(10) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52003XC0416(10)

**Interbranch organisation in the fresh fruit and vegetables sector (Notification made under Article 19(7) of Regulation (EC) No 2200/96) **

*
Official Journal C 091 , 16/04/2003 P. 0017 - 0017 *

Interbranch organisation in the fresh fruit and vegetables sector

(Notification made under Article 19(7) of Regulation (EC) No 2200/96)

(2003/C 91/11)

The Greek authorities have notified the Commission of their decision to recognise under Article 19 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 47/2003(2), the national interbranch association for peaches and pears intended for processing (EDOVRA).

- Area of activity: Greece.

- Activities: EDOVRA will carry out all the activities laid down for interbranch organisations in the relevant parts of Regulation (EC) No 2200/96.

(1) OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 64.
###### Editorial Note on Part 193

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

#### §§ 193.2305-193.2319 [Reserved]
-----Original Message----- 

From: mavonna.ellis@gmail.com [mailto:mavonna.ellis@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:37 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Mavonna Ellis 

1616 South August 

Stillwater, OK 74074
99-14.

#### State ex rel. Fries v. Williamson.

In Prohibition. Reported at 84 Ohio St.3d 1462, 704 N.E.2d 572. On motion for reconsideration and on request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. Motion and request denied.
§ 215.119 Defective freight car truck. A railroad may not place or continue in service a car, if the car has— ( a ) A side frame or bolster that— ( 1 ) Is broken; or
( 2 ) Has a crack of 1 ⁄ 4 of an inch or more in the transverse direction on a tension member;
( b ) A truck equipped with a snubbing device that is ineffective, as evidenced by— ( 1 ) A snubbing friction element that is worn beyond a wear indicator;
( 2 ) A snubber wear plate that is loose, missing (except by design), or worn through;
( 3 ) A broken or missing snubber activating spring; or
( 4 ) Snubber unit that is broken, or in the case of hydraulic units, is broken or leaking clearly formed droplets of oil or other fluid.
( c ) A side bearing in any of the following conditions: ( 1 ) Part of the side bearing assembly is missing or broken;
( 2 ) The bearings at one end of the car, on both sides, are in contact with the body bolster (except by design);
( 3 ) The bearings at one end of the car have a total clearance from the body bolster of more than 3 ⁄ 4 of an inch; or
( 4 ) At diagonally opposite sides of the car, the bearings have a total clearance from the body bolsters of more than 3 ⁄ 4 of an inch;
( d ) Truck springs— ( 1 ) That do not maintain travel or load;
( 2 ) That are compressed solid; or
( 3 ) More than one outer spring of which is broken, or missing, in any spring cluster;
( e ) Interference between the truck bolster and the center plate that prevents proper truck rotations; or
( f ) Brake beam shelf support worn so excessively that it does not support the brake beam.
258 P.2d 759

#### MUNROE v. SULLIVAN MIN. CO.

No. 7871.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

June 16, 1953.

*144E. B. Smith, Walter M. Oros, Boise, for appellant.

Chas. E. Horning, Sennett Taylor, Wallace,' Paul C. Keeton, Lewiston, for respondent.

GIVENS, Justice.

Appellant’s appeal, from the order of the Industrial Accident Board denying compensation, urges the evidence does not support the denial of the award and shows appellant is entitled to compensation because either the tuberculosis, with which he is afflicted and thereby incapacitated for work, so suddenly appeared as to constitute an accident under Dobbs v. Bureau of Highways, 63 Idaho 290, 120 P.2d 263, and/or the evidence shows he has silicosis to a degree which was an essential factor in connection with the tuberculosis in causing his disability — thus an occupational disease under Section 72-1220, Idaho Code.

Several assignments of error are made, but only two are essential, both questions of fact. First, whether there is evidence to sustain the Board in considering there was not a sufficiently sudden onslaught of the tuberculosis to constitute an accident; and, second, the evidence is sufficient to support the finding that silicosis was not and is not an essential factor in causing, in connection with tuberculosis, claimant’s disability.

As suggested by appellant, these are basically medical questions. Two doctors testified in support of appellant’s position and two doctors testified to the contrary; thus, there was a conflict in the evidence.

*145 The prerogative of the Board is, by statute, constitution, and decisions of this Court, to determine such conflicts and determine the facts, and there is ample evidence to support their denial of the award.

There are no errors of law; therefore, the order denying compensation must be and is *affirmed.*

PORTER, C. J., TAYLOR and THOMAS, JJ., and McQUADE, District Judge, concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 41 (Friday, March 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13931-13932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04799]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8211]

 Designation of Iyad ag Ghali, Also Known as Iyad ag Ghaly, as a 
Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of 
Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Iyad ag Ghali, 
also known as Iyad ag Ghaly, committed, or poses a significant risk of 
committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. 
nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the 
United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render

[[Page 13932]]

ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 20, 2013.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-04799 Filed 2-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
#### National Bank of Kinderhook *v.*John Wilcoxson.

Motion to correct order denied, with ten dollars costs.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





**Certification
      Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.** § **1350)**




The
      undersigned, as the chief executive officer of PAB Bankshares, Inc., certifies,
      to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
      period ended June 30, 2006, which accompanies this certification fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PAB
      Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing
      certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other
      purpose.





Dated
      this 9th day of August, 2006.


*/s/
                  M. Burke Welsh, Jr*M.
                  Burke Welsh, Jr.President
                  and Chief Executive Officer
   A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
          to
          PAB Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by PAB Bankshares, Inc. and furnished
          to the SEC or its staff upon request.
#### § 236.802a Siding.

An auxiliary track for meeting or passing trains.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Sterling Gas Drilling Fund 1982 third quarter 1999 10Q and is qualified
in its entirety by refernce to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              22
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    22
<PP&E>                                      12,436,895
<DEPRECIATION>                             (11,773,553)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 663,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          252,454
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     400,910<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   663,364
<SALES>                                        166,249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,249
<CGS>                                          192,695
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  192,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (26,446)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.82)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Other -SE includes total partners equity.
<F2>The income allocated to the limited partner's group was divided
by the total number of limited partnership units of 14,370.
</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 212.215 Locomotive inspector. ( a ) The locomotive inspector is required, at a minimum, to be able to conduct independent inspections of locomotives and air brake systems for the purpose of determining compliance with applicable sections of the Safety Glazing Standards (49 CFR part 223), Locomotive Safety Standards (49 CFR part 229), Safety Appliance Standards (49 CFR part 231) and Power Brake Standards (49 CFR part 232), to make reports of those inspections and to recommend the institution of enforcement actions when appropriate to promote compliance.
( b ) The locomotive inspector is required, at a minimum, to have at least four years of experience in locomotive construction or maintenance. A bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering or a related technical specialization may be substituted for two of the four years of this experience requirement and successful completion of the apprentice training program may be substituted for the four year experience requirement.
( c ) The locomotive inspector shall demonstrate the following specific qualifications: ( 1 ) A comprehensive knowledge of construction, testing, inspecting and repair of locomotive and air brakes;
( 2 ) The ability to understand and detect deviations from: ( i ) Railroad equipment maintenance standards accepted in the industry; and
( ii ) Safety Glazing Standards, Locomotive Safety Standards, Safety Appliance Standards and Power Brake Standards;
( 3 ) The knowledge of railroad operating procedures associated with the operation of locomotives and air brakes sufficient to understand the safety significance of deviations and combinations of deviations; and
( 4 ) Specialized knowledge of proper remedial action to be taken in order to bring defective locomotives, and air brakes into compliance with applicable Federal standards.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         165,553
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             130
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    242,882
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         752,258
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           746,990
<LOANS>                                      1,616,069
<ALLOWANCE>                                     27,085
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,060,429
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,088,347
<SHORT-TERM>                                   489,621
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             37,603
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       444,858
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,060,429
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                113,493
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               45,282
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,471
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               160,246
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              40,032
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,428
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          107,818
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,750
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 82,561
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 78,646
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      78,646
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,732
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.64
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,824
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,745
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 81,575
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                24,678
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,819
<RECOVERIES>                                     3,476
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               27,085
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            11,402
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         15,683


</TABLE>