alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 24.6 Administration of jointly-funded projects.

Whenever two or more Federal agencies provide financial assistance to an agency or agencies, other than a Federal agency, to carry out functionally or geographically related activities which will result in the acquisition of property or the displacement of a person, the Federal agencies may by agreement designate one such agency as the cognizant Federal agency. In the unlikely event that agreement among the agencies cannot be reached as to which agency shall be the cognizant Federal agency, then the Lead Agency shall designate one of such agencies to assume the cognizant role. At a minimum, the agreement shall set forth the federally assisted activities which are subject to its terms and cite any policies and procedures, in addition to this part, that are applicable to the activities under the agreement. Under the agreement, the cognizant Federal agency shall ensure that the project is in compliance with the provisions of the Uniform Act and this part. All federally assisted activities under the agreement shall be deemed a project for the purposes of this part.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 5/18/15 3:01 PM

Received: May 18, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8ix3-ur69

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0279

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Eric Nay

Address: 

8863 Flintridge Lane

Temescal Valley, CA, 92883

Email: ericnay@gmail.com

Phone: 9516675170

General Comment

This is a good rule change. As is stated in the brief, individuals need unbiased advice when 

directing their retirement funds. This is an appropriate change in order to protect individual 

investors.

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481ae656f&format=xml&show... 5/18/2015
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 10, 1995 (125), Para 125.6 Resignation as Member of House of Representatives]
[Page 1496]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.125.6  resignation as member of house of representatives

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, laid before the House the 
following communication, which was read as follows:

                                     House of Representatives,

                               Washington, DC, September 11, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     Speaker of the House of Representatives,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Speaker Gingrich: I am writing to inform you that I 
     will be resigning my position as the Member of Congress from 
     the 15th Congressional District of California. The effective 
     resignation date will be October 10, 1995.
           Sincerely,
                                                 Norman Y. Mineta,
                                               Member of Congress.
```
**Data Needed on Chromium Electroplating and Anodizing Facilities**

 Facility Data o Name o Location o Lat - Long Coordinates  Process Ty

pe o Hard chromium electroplating o Decorative chromium electroplating o Trivalent chromium electroplating o Chromium anodizing o Other el ectroplating o Other co - located processes subject to NESHAP  Tank Design and Operation o Dimensions o Rectifier capacity o Annual hours of operation (permitted and actual)  Emission Control Technology o Ty pe of control method or control device o Control device operating parameters (e.g., bath surface tension)  Emission Test Data o Complete test report (if available)  Other Available Supporting Documents o Emission inventory

report o Permit application o Operating permit
§ 225.23 Joint operations. ( a ) Any reportable death, injury, or illness of an employee arising from an accident/incident involving joint operations must be reported on Form FRA F 6180.55a by the employing railroad.
( b ) In all cases involving joint operations, each railroad must report on Form FRA F 6180.55a the casualties to all persons on its train or other on-track equipment. Casualties to railroad employees must be reported by the employing railroad regardless of whether the employees were on or off duty. Casualties to all other persons not on trains or on-track equipment must be reported on Form FRA F 6180.55a by the railroad whose train or equipment is involved. Any person found unconscious or dead, if such condition arose from the operation of a railroad, on or adjacent to the premises or right-of-way of the railroad having track maintenance responsibility must be reported by that railroad on Form FRA F 6180.55a.
( c ) In rail equipment accident/incident cases involving joint operations, the railroad responsible for carrying out repairs to, and maintenance of, the track on which the accident/incident occurred, and any other railroad directly involved in the accident/incident, each must report the accident/incident on Form FRA F 6180.54.
[39 FR 43224, Dec. 11, 1974, as amended at 42 FR 1221, Jan. 6, 1977; 68 FR 10138, Mar. 3, 2003]
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

October 15, 2014

Jacynthia Bristol, Library Assistant

La Sal Library

893 Utah 46

La Sal, UT 84530

Subject: Request to retain public documents at the La Sal Library for public inspection

Dear Ms. Bristol:

The purpose of this letter is to request that the La Sal Library retain the enclosed documents at the

library for at least sixty (60) days for public inspection. These documents are the U. S. Environmental

Protection Agency’s preliminary decision for the proposed Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant

Deterioration amendment permit for the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo

Nation Indian Reservation near the city ofAneth, San Juan County, Utah. These documents are

currently available for public comment.

Please contact me at (415) 947-4156 or ke1ly.shaheerah(~,epa.gov if you have any questions.

Environmental Engineer

Air Division

Shaheerah

Permits Office

Enclosures
#### § 236.787 Protection, cross.

An arrangement to prevent the improper operation of a signal, switch, movable-point frog, or derail as the result of a cross in electrical circuits.

Cross Reference:

Ramp, see [§ 236.744](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-236.744).
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 10, 1995 (125), Para 125.15 Veterans Compensation]
[Page 1497]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.125.15  veterans compensation

  Mr. STUMP moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 2394) to 
increase, effective as of December 1, 1995, the rates of compensation 
for veterans with service-connected disabilities and the rates of 
dependency and indemnity compensation for the survivors of certain 
disabled veterans.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LATHAM, recognized Mr. STUMP and Mr. 
MONTGOMERY, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LATHAM, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and 
said bill was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 18



January 8, 2004


The Audit Committee
CLARCOR Inc.
2323 Sixth Street
Rockford, IL 61125

Dear Directors:

We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form
10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have audited the consolidated financial statements in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 29, 2003 and issued our report
thereon dated January 8, 2004. Note C to the financial statements describes a
change in accounting principle from the last in, first out to the first in,
first out method for certain inventories. It should be understood that the
preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another for inventory
accounting has not been addressed in any authoritative accounting literature,
and in expressing our concurrence below we have relied on management's
determination that this change in accounting principle is preferable. Based on
our reading of management's stated reasons and justification for this change in
accounting principle in the Form 10-K, and our discussions with management as to
their judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to the
change, we concur with management that such change represents, in the Company's
circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity
with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20.

Very truly yours,



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
From: [mailto:] 

Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 2:43 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Stop the fiduciary rule.

 

My middle-income savings for retirement are invested per my decisions with the assistance of a 

knowledgeable financial advisor. A financial advisor whom I would not be able to afford if this 

rule went into effect, raising regulatory and liability costs.
#### Jesse Seligman, *Respondent, v.*George E. Fisher, Appellant.—

Order modified as directed in opinion, without costs to either party. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
Page 1 of2 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

Docket: IRS-2009-0008 

Rquest for Tnfonnation for Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Hcalth Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: 1 RS-2000-0008-000 1 

Request fur Information Rcgarding the Paul W ellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Hcalth Parity 

and Addic~ion Equity Act of 208 

Document: IRS-2.009:0008-P059. 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-09629 

Submitter Information 

Address: 

Chicago, IL. 

General Comment 

Comments regarding Regulatory Guidance USCG-2007-27022 

page 19 157,Tl B specific areas 1 and 4 

I am a clinlcal psychologist who provides EEG hiofeedback treatment to 

individuals with Attention Deficit Hypcrnct ivity Disorder and Mood Disorders. EEG 

biofeedback is an empirically validated and widely rewgnizcd cffcctjvc non 

medicntiol~ treatment for ADHD, as well as other conditions. Therc arc ova 50 

studies evaluating the effectiveness of EEG biofeedback in the treatment of 

ADHD, Subslancc Usc disorders and Autism. . A recent review of this literature 

concludd "EEG bivfcvdback meets the American Acadmy of Child and 

Adolescent Psychiatry criteria Sor" Clinical tiuidcljncs "for treatment of ADHD." 

This means that EBG biofedback meets the samc criteria as to medication for 

treating ADHD, and that EEG biofeedback "should always be considcrd as an 

intervent ion for this disorder hy the clinician". 

This service has been dcnid by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, United Behavioral 

Health, Blue Cross, Cigna, and Ammigroup. 

This is limitation of an effective and vaitdated trcatmcnt for a nlentnl health 

problem. The reasvns given by thc insurance cnrnpat~ies for this denial fell into 

two categories: 1) our company docs riot cover biofeedback for Mental Health 

problms or 2) there is nvl yul sufficimt evidence for the efficacy of EEG 

biofeedback. As such, they arc using cvidcnce-bawd csita-ia that are far more 

restrictive for mental healLh s~rviccs than the criteria which are used for 

medicallsurgical services. Thcre are many routir~e medical and surgical 

procedures which have Sar fewer controlled studies ahout their efficacy than does 
EEG biofeedback. These medical and surgical procedures are generally not 

limited because of cunccms about how lnmy controlled studies have heen 

performed about them. 

We believe that the pariiy rcgula tions, based on legnl reviews of the parity 

statue should require that employcrs and plans pay for the smne range and 

scope of services for Behavioral Treatmtmts as thcy do for Med Surg benefits and 

that n p I ca~inot be more restrictive in their managed care criteria and reviews 

for MH ar~d SA disorders when cnmpared to Med Surg. Today plans are being 

more restrictive in how thcy rcvicw evidenced based Mental Health and Substance 

Abuse Trvatmmts when compared to Md Surg treatments. This violates both 

the intent and letter of'the parity statute and we hopc that the regulations will 

clarify that this can't continue.
-----Original Message----- 

From: gmeigs@gmail.com [mailto:gmeigs@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:49 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

We need more fairness and justice in the health care system. 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Garrett Meigs 

2760 NW Fillmore Ave 

Corvallis, OR 97330
§ 240.3 Application and responsibility for compliance. ( a ) This part applies to all railroads, except: ( 1 ) Railroads that operate only on track inside an installation that is not part of the general railroad system of transportation (*i.e.,* plant railroads, as defined in § 240.7);
( 2 ) Tourist, scenic, historic, or excursion operations that are not part of the general railroad system of transportation as defined in § 240.7; or
( 3 ) Rapid transit operations in an urban area that are not connected to the general railroad system of transportation.
( b ) Although the duties imposed by this part are generally stated in terms of the duty of a railroad, each person, including a contractor for a railroad, who performs any function covered by this part must perform that function in accordance with this part.
[85 FR 81307, Dec. 15, 2020]
Exhibit 10.35

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of Ms. Patricia
Consalvi,  her  successors or assigns (the "Holder") at such place as the Holder
may, from time to rime,  designate in writing,  interest from January 1, 2005 at
the rate hereinbelow provided, to be paid in lawful money of the United State of
America as follows:


1     Interest  shall  accrue from January 1, 2005 at the rate of 18% per annum.
      Interest  shall be paid  monthly.  The  monthly  payment  being the sum of
      $1,500.00.

2     The  principal sum of U.S.  Dollars One hundred  thousand and cents 00/100
      shall be paid on December 31, 2009 together with interest,  as applicable,
      on the unpaid principal balance.

3     In addition to the above,  at the option of the Holder,  the  indebtedness
      evidenced  by this  Note,  including  all  unpaid  principal  and  accrued
      interest,  shall become due and payable  without notice or demand upon the
      failure of the undersigned to pay any sum due hereunder when due.

4     The undersigned  agrees to pay all costs of collection,  including without
      limitation reasonable attorney's fees.

5.    All  payments  hereon  shall be in lawful  money of the  United  States of
      America in immediately available funds. The note may be prepaid in full or
      part at any time without penalty.

5     The provisions hereof shall be deemed  independent and severable,  and the
      invalidity or partial invalidity or  unenforceability of any one provision
      or portion hereof shall not affect the validity or  enforceability  of any
      other  provision  hereof.  This note will be  governed  by the laws of the
      Starr of California.


                                                                           MAKER


                                       Signature:  /s/ Larry Consalvi
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   President and CEO

                                       Gateway International Holdings Inc.
                                       Elite Machine Tool Company, Inc
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2203

To reauthorize the tied aid credit program of the Export-Import Bank of

the United States, and to allow the Export-Import Bank to conduct

a demonstration project.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 4, 1995

Mr. CASTLE (by request) (for himself, Mr. GONZALEZ, and Mr. FLAKE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Banking

and Financial Services

A BILL

To reauthorize the tied aid credit program of the ExportImport Bank of the United States, and to allow the

Export-Import Bank to conduct a demonstration project.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIED AID CREDIT PROGRAM.

4 (a) Section 10(c)(2) of the Export-Import Bank Act

5 of 1945 (12 U.S.C. 635i–3(c)(2)) is amended by striking

6 ‘‘1995’’ and inserting ‘‘1997’’.

7 (b) Section 10(e) of the Export-Import Bank Act of

8 1945 (12 U.S.C. 635i–3(e)) is amended by striking

9 ‘‘1993, 1994, and 1995’’ and inserting ‘‘1996 and 1997’’.
2

•HR 2203 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT A DEMONSTRATION

2 PROJECT.

3 Notwithstanding section 4701(a)(1)(A) of title 5,

4 United States Code, the Export-Import Bank of the

5 United States may conduct a demonstration project in ac6 cordance with section 4703 of such title.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2464 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2464

To amend Public Law 103-93 to provide additional lands within the State 
  of Utah for the Goshute Indian Reservation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 1995

  Mr. Hansen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend Public Law 103-93 to provide additional lands within the State 
  of Utah for the Goshute Indian Reservation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITION OF CERTAIN UTAH STATE LANDS TO GOSHUTE INDIAN 
              RESERVATION.

    The Utah Schools and Lands Improvement Act of 1993 (107 Stat. 995) 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating section 11 as section 12; and
            (2) by inserting after section 10 the following new 
        section:

``SEC. 11. ADDITIONAL GOSHUTE INDIAN RESERVATION LANDS.

    ``(a) Further Additions to Goshute Reservation.--In addition to the 
lands described in section 3, for the purpose of securing in trust for 
the Goshute Indian Tribe certain additional public lands and lands 
belonging to the State of Utah, which comprise approximately 8,000 
acres of surface and subsurface estate, as generally depicted on the 
map entitled `Additional Utah-Goshute Exchange', dated July 1, 1994, 
such public lands and State lands are hereby declared to be part of the 
Goshute Indian Reservation in the State of Utah effective upon the 
completion of conveyance of the State lands from the State of Utah and 
acceptance of title by the United States.
    ``(b) Authorization.--The Secretary of the Interior is authorized 
to acquire through exchange those lands and interests in land described 
in subsection (a) which are owned by the State of Utah, subject to 
valid existing rights.
    ``(c) Application of Prior Provisions.--(1) Except as provided in 
paragraph (2), the remaining provisions of this Act which are 
applicable to the lands to be transferred to the Goshute Indian Tribe 
pursuant to section 3 shall also apply to the lands subject to this 
section.
    ``(2) The Goshute Indian Tribe will be responsible for payment of 
the costs of appraisal of the lands to be acquired pursuant to this 
section, which costs shall be paid prior to the transfer of such 
lands.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 29.107 What recourse does the Department or the Tribe have if the negotiations reach an impasse?

The Department and the Tribe should resolve disagreements informally and by mutual agreement whenever possible. If the Department and the Tribe are unable to reach agreement by the agreed upon date for completing negotiations, the Tribe may request to participate in an alternative dispute resolution process pursuant to § 29.901, or it may submit a final offer to the Self-Governance Official in accordance with subpart C of this part.
§ 28.140 Employment. ( a ) No qualified individual with handicaps shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the Department.
( b ) The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities. The provisions of this section do not apply to military personnel of the U.S. Coast Guard.
**Exhibit 32.b**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Cinergy Corp., The Cincinnati Gas & ElectricCompany, PSI Energy, Inc. and The Union Light, Heat and Power Company (the“Companies”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, R. Foster Duncan, Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Companies.

 

 
| /s/ R.  Foster Duncan    |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| R. Foster  Duncan        |
| Chief  Financial Officer |
| March 3,  2004           |

 

----