alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, William C. Niegsch, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Max & Erma’s Restaurants,Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
24

 
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.       Date: September 13, 2006                 /s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr.             William C. Niegsch, Jr.,
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11135 Summary Calendar

LARRY GENE POWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEMPLE INLAND MORTGAGE CORPORATION; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT; CENTURY 21 REAL ESTATE COMPANY; THE CITY OF TERRELL, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas (3:96-CV-2351-D)

February 19, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DUHÉ and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *



### Larry Gene Powell appeals the denial of a motion for a TR O and/or1 Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659 (5th Cir. 1987).

2 Matter of Lieb , 915 F.2d 180 (5th Cir. 1990).

2 

### preliminary injunction. We must determine, sua sponte if necessary, whether we

have appellate jurisdiction. 1 

### We find that we do not for the denial of a TRO is not

appealable. 2 

### Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.
-----Original Message----- 

From: cdipboye@gmail.com [mailto:cdipboye@gmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:17 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. As a pastor, I am all too aware of the great distress so 

many in our community go through when they are cut off from accessing 

effective mental health services, and I am convinced that in a society 

like ours there is absolutely no excuse for this serious gap in the 

care we extend to our citizens. Please ensure that mental health care 

and physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Carolyn Dipboye 

108 Wimberly Lane 

Oak Ridge, TN 37830
#### William S. Darling, Respondent, v. Henry C. Brown, Appellant.

Order reversed and amendment allowed on payment of ten dollars costs of opposing motion, to be offset against ten dollars costs of this appeal.
§ 209.213 Appeal. ( a ) Any party aggrieved by a presiding officer's decision may file an appeal with the Administrator. The appeal must be filed within twenty (20) days after service of the presiding officer's decision.
( b ) Prior to rendering a final determination on an appeal, the Administrator may remand the case for further proceedings before the hearing officer.
( c ) The filing of an appeal does not stay the effectiveness of a compliance order unless the Administrator expressly so provides.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND FROM THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
THREE MONTHS AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         406,056
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  180,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                   16,954
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         10,775,487
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,868,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        7,774,760
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,364,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,868,235
<SALES>                                        2,093,487
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,323,514
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,585,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             368,635
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (630,969)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (630,969)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (630,969)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>THE PARTNERHSIP HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET;THEREFORE THE VALUE IS $0.
<F2>THIS INFORMATION IS NOT DISCLOSED IN THE PARTNERSHIP'S FORM 10-Q.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# Uradni list L 174I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0804 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | L 174I |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Zakonodaja | Letnik 6418. maj 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0804

Uradni list

Evropske unije

L 174I

Slovenska izdaja

Zakonodaja

Letnik 6418. maj 2021

---

| Vsebina | | II   Nezakonodajni akti | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SKLEPI |
| | * | Sklep Sveta (SZVP) 2021/796 z dne 17. maja 2021 o spremembi Sklepa (SZVP) 2019/797 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti kibernetskim napadom, ki ogrožajo Unijo ali njene države članice | 1 |

Vsebina

II   Nezakonodajni akti

Stran

SKLEPI

*

Sklep Sveta (SZVP) 2021/796 z dne 17. maja 2021 o spremembi Sklepa (SZVP) 2019/797 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti kibernetskim napadom, ki ogrožajo Unijo ali njene države članice

1

| SL | Akti z rahlo natisnjenimi naslovi so tisti, ki se nanašajo na dnevno upravljanje kmetijskih zadev in so splošno veljavni za omejeno obdobje.
  Naslovi vseh drugih aktov so v mastnem tisku in pred njimi stoji zvezdica. |
| --- | --- |

SL

Akti z rahlo natisnjenimi naslovi so tisti, ki se nanašajo na dnevno upravljanje kmetijskih zadev in so splošno veljavni za omejeno obdobje.

Naslovi vseh drugih aktov so v mastnem tisku in pred njimi stoji zvezdica.

---

II Nezakonodajni akti

SKLEPI

| 18.5.2021 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | LI 174/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2021

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

LI 174/1

---

SKLEP SVETA (SZVP) 2021/796

z dne 17. maja 2021

o spremembi Sklepa (SZVP) 2019/797 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti kibernetskim napadom, ki ogrožajo Unijo ali njene države članice

SVET EVROPSKE UNIJE JE –

ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti člena 29 Pogodbe,

ob upoštevanju predloga visokega predstavnika Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko,

ob upoštevanju naslednjega:

| (1) | Svet je 17. maja 2019 sprejel Sklep (SZVP) 2019/797 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Svet je 17. maja 2019 sprejel Sklep (SZVP) 2019/797 (1).

| (2) | Sklep (SZVP) 2019/797 se uporablja do 18. maja 2021. Na podlagi pregleda navedenega sklepa bi bilo treba omejevalne ukrepe, določene v njem, podaljšati do 18. maja 2022. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Sklep (SZVP) 2019/797 se uporablja do 18. maja 2021. Na podlagi pregleda navedenega sklepa bi bilo treba omejevalne ukrepe, določene v njem, podaljšati do 18. maja 2022.

| (3) | Sklep (SZVP) 2019/797 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti – |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Sklep (SZVP) 2019/797 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –

SPREJEL NASLEDNJI SKLEP:

Člen 1

Člen 10 Sklepa (SZVP) 2019/797 se nadomesti z naslednjim:

„Člen 10

Ta sklep se uporablja do 18. maja 2022 in se redno pregleduje. Če Svet meni, da njegovi cilji niso bili doseženi, ga po potrebi obnovi ali spremeni.“

Člen 2

Ta sklep začne veljati na dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.

V Bruslju, 17. maja 2021

Za Svet

predsednica

A. P. ZACARIAS

---

(1)  Sklep Sveta (SZVP) 2019/797 z dne 17. maja 2019 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti kibernetskim napadom, ki ogrožajo Unijo ali njene države članice (UL L 129 I, 17.5.2019, str. 13).

1

---
From: scanderson1@charter.net [mailto:scanderson1@charter.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:26 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sharon Anderon 

166 Autumn Ridge Ct 

Talent,OR 

Sincerely, 

Sharon Anderson 

166 Autumn Ridge CT 

Talent, OR 97540
-----Original Message----- 

From: jenhop66@comcast.net [mailto:jenhop66@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:07 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jennifer Hopkins 

2120 Stockton Street 

Napa, CA 94559
#### § 238.601 Scope.

This subpart contains specific safety planning requirements for the operation of Tier II passenger equipment, procurement of Tier II passenger equipment, and the introduction or major upgrade of new technology in existing Tier II passenger equipment that affects a safety system on such equipment.
-----Original Message----- 

From: unimog63@msn.com [mailto:unimog63@msn.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:48 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Patrick Kennedy 

2264A 35th St 

Los Alamos, NM 87544
§ 207.7 Training. ( a ) A state may consider an individual to have met that state's basic police officer certification or commissioning requirements for qualification as a railroad police officer under this section if that individual: ( 1 ) Has successfully completed a program at a state-recognized police training academy in another state or at a Federal law enforcement training center; and
( 2 ) Is certified or commissioned as a police officer by the other state.
( b ) Nothing in this section shall be construed as superseding or affecting any state training requirements related to criminal law, civil procedure, motor vehicle code, any other state law, or state-mandated comparative or annual in-service training academy or Federal law enforcement training center.
[81 FR 88132, Dec. 7, 2016]
#### Same *v.*Benjamin R. Seaman, *Appellant*.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY §

LABORERS PENSION FUND, §

CENTRAL LABORERS’ PENSION §

FUND, LAWRENCE MILES, AND § No. 411, 2022

BRIAN SEAVITT, derivatively on §

b ehalf of SOLARWINDS §

CORPORATION, §

§ Court Below: Court of Chancery

Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, § of the State of Delaware

§

v. §

§

MIKE BINGLE, WILLIAM BOCK, § C.A. No. 2021

- 0940

SE TH BORO, PAUL J. CORMIER, §

KENNETH Y. HAO, MICHAEL §

HOFFMAN, DENNIS HOWARD, §

CAT HERINE R. KINNEY, JAMES §

LINES, EASWARAN SUNDARAM, §

KEVIN B. THOMPSON, JASON §

WHITE, MICHAEL WIDMANN, §

§

Defendants Below, Appellees, §

§

and §

§

SOLARWINDS CORPORATION, §

§

Nominal Defendant Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: April 26, 2023

Decided: May 17, 2023

Before SEITZ , Chief Justice; VALIHURA , and TRAYNOR , Justices.

O R D E R

Now this 17th day of May 2023, the Court having considered this matter on the

briefs and oral arguments of the part ies and the record below and having concluded thatthe same should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of

Chancery in its Memorandum Opinion dated September 6, 2022

, and its Final Order and

Judgment dated October 13, 2022;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the Court

of Chancery be and the same hereby is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
#### § 219.505 Non-negative tests and refusals.

An applicant who has tested positive or refused to submit to pre-employment testing under this section may not perform regulated service for any railroad until he or she has completed the Federal return-to-duty process under § 219.104(d). An applicant may also not perform DOT safety-sensitive functions for any other employer regulated by a DOT agency until he or she has completed the Federal return-to-duty process under § 219.104(d). This section does not create any right on the part of the applicant to have a subsequent application considered; nor does it restrict the discretion of the railroad to entertain a subsequent application for employment from the same person.

[81 FR 37937, June 10, 2016]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, October 20, 1995 (132), Para 132.4 Recess--10:02 A.M.]
[Page 1571]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.132.4  recess--10:02 a.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. UPTON, pursuant to clause 12 of rule I, 
declared the House in recess at 10 o'clock and 2 minutes a.m., subject 
to the call of the Chair.
```
**EXHIBIT
23.3**


























**PENNSYLVANIA
ELECTRIC COMPANY**





**CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We hereby consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.
333-62295, 333-62295-01 and 333-62295-02) of Pennsylvania Electric Company of
our report dated February 27, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial
statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Stockholders, which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 27, 2007 relating to the
financial statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.














PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP





Cleveland,
OH


February 27,
2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from Century
Properties Fund XVIII 2000 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                               0000704271
<NAME>                              Century Properties Fund XVIII
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1,000


<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                   380
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                28,052
<DEPRECIATION>                                        11,390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        17,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                               19,184
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                            (1,959)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          17,649
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       1,252
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       1,114
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                             138
<EPS-BASIC>                                             1.65 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Frank S. Roberts, Appellant, v. Gustavo Oberbeck, Respondent.

New trial ordered, with costs to' abide the event. Opinions by

Brady, J., and Davis, P. J.;

Daniels, J., concurring in lesult.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 28, 1995 (122), Para 122.9 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 1170]
[Page 1462]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.122.9  providing for the consideration of h.r. 1170

  Mr. DREIER, by direction of the Committee on Rules, called up the 
following resolution (H. Res. 227):

       Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 
     resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule 
     XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 
     Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 
     the bill (H.R. 1170) to provide that cases challenging the 
     constitutionality of measures passed by State referendum be 
     heard by a 3-judge court. The first reading of the bill shall 
     be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the 
     bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
     controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
     Committee on the Judiciary. After general debate the bill 
     shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. 
     It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the 
     purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment 
     in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
     the Judiciary now printed in the bill. Each section of the 
     committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be 
     considered as read. During consideration of the bill for 
     amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may 
     accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the 
     Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in 
     the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that 
     purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments so printed 
     shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of 
     consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 
     rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 
     may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote 
     in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the 
     Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature 
     of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as 
     ordered on the bill and amendments thereto final passage 
     without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with 
     or without instructions.

  When said resolution was considered.
  After debate,
  On motion of Mr. DREIER, the previous question was ordered on the 
resolution to its adoption or rejection and under the operation thereof, 
the resolution was agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said resolution was agreed to 
was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
```