alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2070 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2070

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To provide for the distribution within the United States of the United 
   States Information Agency film entitled ``Fragile Ring of Life''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2070

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide for the distribution within the United States of the United 
   States Information Agency film entitled ``Fragile Ring of Life''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRIBUTION WITHIN THE UNITED STATES OF UNITED STATES 
              INFORMATION AGENCY FILM ENTITLED ``FRAGILE RING OF 
              LIFE''.

    Notwithstanding section 208 of the Foreign Relations Authorization 
Act, Fiscal Years 1986 and 1987 (22 U.S.C. 1461-1(a)) and the second 
sentence of section 501 of the United States Information and Education 
Exchange Act of 1948 (22 U.S.C. 1461)--
            (1) the Director of the United States Information Agency 
        shall make available to the Archivist of the United States a 
        master copy of the film entitled ``Fragile Ring of Life''; and
            (2) upon evidence that necessary United States rights and 
        licenses have been secured and paid for by the person seeking 
        domestic release of the film, the Archivist shall--
                    (A) reimburse the Director for any expenses of the 
                Agency in making that master copy available;
                    (B) deposit that film in the National Archives of 
                the United States; and
                    (C) make copies of that film available for purchase 
                and public viewing within the United States.
Any reimbursement to the Director pursuant to this section shall be 
credited to the applicable appropriation of the United States 
Information Agency.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 17, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Beatty S. Balestier, Plaintiff, *v.*The Tribune Association, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

September, 1910.)

Discovery and inspection — Examination of party before trial — Procedure — 'Enforcement of order.

Stay of proceedings — Interlocutory stay — Stay to enforce obedience to order.

A resident of Vermont w-ho brings an action for libel in this State against one of its citizens may be required to obey an order for his examination before trial made known to him by service upon his attorneys, before being permitted to try the case.

A stay of proceedings in the action is a proper remedy for the enforcement of plaintiff’s duty to obey the order for his examination before trial.

Motion for a stay of proceedings.

Francis J. McLoughlin, for plaintiff.

Henry W. Sackett, for defendant.

*73Whitney, J.

This is a motion by defendant for a stay of proceeding’s until plaintiff (who is a resident of Brattleboro, Vt., and cannot be personally served within the State)shall come into the State and submit to an examination before trial as required by an order which ha-s been duly served upon his attorneys. Upon the argument plaintiff’s counsel opposed the motion partly by contending that the order for his examination was not justified by the moving papers therefor. In order to expedite a settlement of the question, it was thereupon agreed by counsel, with consent of the court, that the validity of the order for examination should be determined upon this motion, a-s if a cross motion had been made to vacate it. In my opinion the papers are sufficient to support the order. It thus ' remains to be decided whether a plaintiff in an action) of libel against a citizen of the 'State can by keeping out of the S-tate avoid a duty which a citizen residing here would have to fulfill under like circumstances. It seems to me that- *prima facie,,*if within a moderate distance, he must be required to obey the order when made known to him by service upon his attorneys, and that a notice for a stay of proceedings is a proper remedy for enforcement of the duty. In the absence of any affidavit showing the contrary, he must be required to come from B-rattleboro for examination before he is permitted to try his case. Stay until thirty days after he shall have presented himself here for examination granted.

Motion granted.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, October 18, 1995 (130), Para 130.31 Enrolled Bill Signed]
[Page 1552]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.130.31  enrolled bill signed

  Mr. THOMAS, from the Committee on House Oversight, reported that that 
committee had examined and found truly enrolled a bill of the House of 
the following title, which was thereupon signed by the Speaker:

       H.R. 1976. An Act making appropriations for Agriculture, 
     Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related 
     Agencies programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
     1996, and for other purposes.
```
§ 234.217 Flashing light units. ( a ) Each flashing light unit shall be properly positioned and aligned and shall be visible to a highway user approaching the crossing.
( b ) Each flashing light unit shall be maintained to prevent dust and moisture from entering the interior of the unit. Roundels and reflectors shall be clean and in good condition.
( c ) All light units shall flash alternately. The number of flashes per minute for each light unit shall be 35 minimum and 65 maximum.
exv10w29



 







EXHIBIT 10.29




WINLAND ELECTRONICS, INC.

COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

AS OF MARCH 1, 2006



On September 20, 2005, the Winland Electrnoics, Inc. (the “Company”) Compensation Committee set the
2006 base salary for the Chief Executive Officer and, on
December 7, 2005, set the 2006 base
salaries for the other executive officers. On February 16, 2006,
the Board determined the share of the 2005 incentive bonus plan
for each executive officer, including the Chief Executive Officer, for 2005 performance. The
executive officers participate in the Company’s 401(k) Plan and medical and disability plans, as
well as other compensatory plans, contracts and arrangements which are filed as exhibits to the
Company’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005. The following table summarizes, as of
March 1, 2006, the salaries for 2006 of the executive officers, incentive bonuses for 2005
performance from the incentive bonus plan and stock options awarded in 2006 to the executive
officers:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	2006

Annual	 	 	2005

Incentive	 	 	2006

Option	 
	Executive Officer and Title	 	Base Salary	 	 	Bonus	 	 	Shares(1)	 
	Lorin E. Krueger
	 	$	165,000	 	 	$	125,400	 	 	 	—	 
	Chief Executive Officer & President
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Jennifer A. Thompson
	 	$	111,400	 	 	$	23,112	 	 	 	—	 
	Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Dale A. Nordquist
	 	$	111,400 	(2)	 	$	7,650	 	 	 	—	 
	Senior Vice President
of Sales & Marketing
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Terry E. Treanor
	 	$	105,000	 	 	$	30,796	 	 	 	—	 
	Vice President of Manufacturing
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Gregory W. Burneske
	 	$	103,000	 	 	$	26,052	 	 	 	18,000	 
	Vice President of Engineering
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 









 




			
	(1)	 	Compensation Committee granted an option to the Vice
President of Engineering upon
his election as
of January 1, 2006; options may be granted at a later date to the other executive officers.
	 
	(2)	 	Mr. Nordquist is also entitled to certain commissions pursuant to his employment agreement.
-----Original Message----- 

From: politics@freshfill.com [mailto:politics@freshfill.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 4:43 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Mark Clifton 

5416 Lawrence Ln 

Laporte, CO 80535
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 10

- 00037

- CR

AMANDA GAYLE HIXON , Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 272nd District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 09

- 02097

- CRF

- 272

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Amanda Gayle Hixon pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance, less
than one gram, and was sentenced to 10 years in prison. The sentence was suspended
and Hixon was placed on community supervision for 5 years. The State then filed a
motion to revoke Hixon’s community s upervision and a hearing was held before a
magistrate. The magistrate revoked the community supervision and Hixon appealed to

this Court.

Hixon then revised her notice of appeal to request a hearing regarding the
magistrate’s ruling with the referring di strict court. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 54.1113Hixon v. State Page 2

(Vernon 2005 ). Hixon sent a letter to this Court explaining the circumstances of this
proceeding and asking the Court to “remove this case, at this time, from appeal.” The
parties and the trial court agre e that the magistrate’s “judgment is not yet final and
sentence has not yet been pronounced.”
Because there is no final, appealable order, this appeal is dismissed for want of
jurisdiction. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2); 26.2(a).

TOM GRAY C hief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Reyna, and Justice Davis Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed March 24, 2010 Do not publish [CR25]
From: SIPA [mailto:sipa.toronto@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 8:25 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Cc: Stan Buell; Rt. Hon. Stephen Harper Prime Minister

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32 Conflict of Interest

The Small Investor Protection Association (SIPA) was founded in Canada in 1998. Our mission is to help raise 

awareness of how the industry operates. We act as a Voice for Small Investors. We have members in all ten 

provinces and have interviewed many hundreds of investors since 1998.

In Canada we have similar issues where the public is deceived by industry and is losing billions of dollars 

annually due to fraud and wrongdoing in the regulated industry.

The regulators allow the industry to use "unregulated business titles" of Financial Advisor and Vice President 

for their sales persons. This gains peoples trust and as a result many Canadians are losing their retirement 

savings when they place total trust in a commission driven sales person..

Our Securities Acts refer to Adviser and doe not mention the alternate spelling (Advisor) indicated in most 

dictionaries. The industry puts a spin on these spelling variations to deceive the people.

We firmly believe that persons offering financial advice must be held to a fiduciary duty. In Canada people 

believe Financial Advisors have a fiduciary duty, but they are simply sales persons without responsibility to look 

after client's best interests.

It is important that any person or entity with responsibility (for retirement savings especially) for peoples 

investment be held to a fiduciary duty.

Anything less will enable the industry to continue to harvest peoples savings by engaging their trust using 

deception and depriving them of the future for which they have saved.

Inevitably the industry will forcefully argue against fiduciary duty but Government must act for the benefit of 

the people and implement legislation for fiduciary duty.

In Canada our regulators are greatly influenced if not controlled by the industry with the result there has been 

little advancement in investor protection for decades.

We applaud the Department of Labor and President Obama for their stance on implementing fiduciary duty 

with regard to retirement savings. We fully support this initiative.

We remain hopeful that your actions may have influence on our Government in Canada.

Sincerely,

Stan Buell

President

Small Investor Protection Association

Seeking Truth and Justice

www.sipa.ca

e-mail: sipa.toronto@gmail.com

tel: 416-614-9128
#### In the Matter of Laying out Public Parks, etc.

Application denied, without costs. Opinions by

Daniels, J., and Davis, P. J.
§ 229.59 Leakage. ( a ) Leakage from the main air reservoir and related piping may not exceed an average of 3 pounds per square inch per minute for 3 minutes after the pressure has been reduced to 60 percent of the maximum pressure.
( b ) Brake pipe leakage may not exceed 5 pounds per square inch per minute.
( c ) With a full service application at maximum brake pipe pressure and with communication to the brake cylinders closed, the brakes shall remain applied at least 5 minutes.
( d ) Leakage from control air reservoir, related piping, and pneumatically operated controls may not exceed an average of 3 pounds per square inch per minute for 3 minutes.
-----Original Message----- 

From: poday@psouth.net [mailto:poday@psouth.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:15 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Patricia O'Day-Senior 

180 Shore Acres Rd. 

Parsonsfield, ME 04047
II

Calendar No. 200

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2288

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 25), 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

SEPTEMBER 29 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 25), 1995

Reported by Mr. ROTH, without amendment

AN ACT

To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security Act

to extend for 2 years the deadline by which States are

required to have in effect an automated data processing

and information retrieval system for use in the administration of State plans for child and spousal support.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTOMATION DEAD4 LINE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 454(24) of the Social Se6 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 654(24)) is amended by striking

7 ‘‘1995’’ and inserting ‘‘1997’’.
2

HR 2288 RS

1 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS RELATED TO THE RE2 PEAL OF FEDERAL FUNDING.—Section 452 of such Act

3 (42 U.S.C. 652) is amended in each of subsections

4 (d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(A), (d)(2)(B), and (e), by striking

5 ‘‘455(a)(1)(B)’’ and inserting ‘‘454(16)’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 27,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 200

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2288

AN ACT

To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security

plans for child and spousal support.system for use in the administration of Statemated data processing and information retrievalStates are required to have in effect an autoAct to extend for 2 years the deadline by which

SEPTEMBER 29 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 25), 1995

Reported without amendment
<PAGE>   1


                                                             EXHIBIT 10.1(d)(2)
                                                             ------------------

                                EKCO GROUP, INC.
                                   SCHEDULE TO
             FORM OF RESTRICTED STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT, AS AMENDED
                 FOR THE QUARTERLY PURCHASE OF RESTRICTED STOCK


<TABLE>
     Each of the following employees of the Company has the following Restricted
Stock Purchase Agreements with the Company pursuant to the Company's 1985
Restricted Stock Plan which are identical in form to the foregoing Form of
Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement, as amended, except as to the number of
shares:


<CAPTION>
Name and Job Title(s)           Date              No. of Shares
---------------------           ----              -------------

<S>                           <C>                    <C>
Donato A. DeNovellis          04/02/95                 245
Executive Vice Presi-         07/02/95                 245
dent, Finance & Admi-         10/01/95                 245
nistration, & Chief           12/31/95                 246
Financial Officer             03/31/96               1,095
                              06/30/96               1,095
                              09/29/96               1,095
                              12/29/96               1,096

Brian R. McQuesten            04/02/95                 309
Vice President &              07/02/95                 309
Controller                    10/01/95                 309
                              12/31/95                 309
                              03/31/96                 901
                              06/30/96                 902
                              09/29/96                 902
                              12/29/96                 901

Jeffrey A. Weinstein          04/02/95                 264
Executive Vice Presi-         07/02/95                 265
dent, Secretary &             10/01/95                 265
General Counsel               12/31/95                 265
                              03/31/96                 818
                              06/30/96                 819
                              09/29/96                 819
                              12/29/96                 818

</TABLE>
§ 211.71 General. ( a ) This subpart consists of interim procedures for the review of emergency orders issued under section 203 of the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970, supplementing § 211.47 of this part.
( b ) Proceedings under this subpart are subject to the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 554-559.
( c ) Notwithstanding § 211.1 of this part, as used in this subpart *Administrator* means the Federal Railroad Administrator or Deputy Administrator.
**Exhibit
      3**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin
      L. Cornwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.










/s/ Kevin L.
      Cornwell


Kevin
      L.
      Cornwell


Chief
      Executive Officer


May
      9,
      2006








*A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 29, 1995 (123), Para 123.33 Appointment of Additional Conferees--H.R. 4]
[Page 1492]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.123.33  appointment of additional conferees--h.r. 4

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, by unanimous consent, announced 
the appointment of Mr. Emerson as an additional conferee on the part of 
the House to the conference with the Senate on the disagreeing votes of 
the two Houses on the amendments of the Senate to the bill (H.R. 4) to 
restore the American family, reduce illegitimacy, control welfare 
spending and reduce welfare dependence.
  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate of the foregoing 
appointment.
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPLOT3D user's manualPLOT3D is a computer graphics program designed to visualize the grids and solutions of computational fluid dynamics. Seventy-four functions are available. Versions are available for many systems. PLOT3D can handle multiple grids with a million or more grid points, and can produce varieties of model renderings, such as wireframe or flat shaded. Output from PLOT3D can be used in animation programs. The first part of this manual is a tutorial that takes the reader, keystroke by keystroke, through a PLOT3D session. The second part of the manual contains reference chapters, including the helpfile, data file formats, advice on changing PLOT3D, and sample command files.Document ID19900013774Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWalatka, Pamela P.*(Computer Sciences Corp. Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Buning, Pieter G.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Pierce, Larry*(Sterling Federal Systems, Inc., Moffett Field CA., United States)*Elson, Patricia A.*(Sterling Federal Systems, Inc., Moffett Field CA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1990Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:101067A-89029NASA-TM-101067Accession Number90N23090Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS2-12961Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013774.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024