alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ruth S. Kidder et al., Appellants, *v.*John L. Childs et al., Respondents.

*Kidder*v. *Childs,*130 App. Div. 259, reversed.

(Submitted June 7, 1911;

decided June 16, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme ’ Court in the second judicial department, *625entered March 10, 1909, in favor of defendants, upon the submission of a controversy under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as to the proper construction of an agreement for the sale of land.

*Charles Stewart Butler*for appellants.

*George M. Mackellar*for respondents.

Judgment reversed and judgment ordered for plaintiffs on the submitted controversy, without costs to any party, on dissenting opinion of Miller, J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, August 4, 1995 (109), Para 109.39 Adjournment]
[Page 1295]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.109.39  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. GONZALEZ, pursuant to the provisions of House 
Concurrent Resolution 92, at 6 o'clock and 17 minutes p.m., the House 
adjourned until 12 o'clock noon on Wednesday, September 6, 1995.
```
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-15-0328 SAT Date: 3/16/2015 11:00:00 PM Print Date: 7/7/2015

Related cases : : Yes Health related cases: Ecotox related cases: Analogs:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 1

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 3 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: Ecotox: N o
Routes of exposure : Health: Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ;
Keywords : Keywords: LUNG
Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-15-0328 FATE:

S < 0.001 mg/L at 25 °C (E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 °C (E) BP > 400 °C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong PBT Potential: P3B1Fate assessor: Ecotox assessor: Health assessor:
-----Original Message----- 

From: klburns1@msn.com [mailto:klburns1@msn.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:11 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kenton Burns 

2225 Birch Street 

Denver, CO 80207
#### § 179.400 General specification applicable to cryogenic liquid tank car tanks.
#### Mather B. Almon and *others, Respondents, v.*James G. Hamilton and others, *Appellants.*The Bank of Nova Scotia, *Respondents, v.*James G. Hamilton and others, *Appellants.*

Judgment affirmed.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 25, 2010

s0517 

# Order

May 25, 2010

140036

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140036 COA: 293341 Kent CC: 06-005481-FC EVERETT CHARLTON CARPENTER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 2, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PHI Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Henry D. Fahman, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Henry Fahman

Henry Fahman

Acting CFO

May 14, 2009

1

---
From: Tabatha Richardson [mailto:tnr7241985@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 10:18 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

I'm writing today in opposition to the DOL’s proposed uniform fiduciary standard. I 

believe the law will have a negative affect on more than 50% of consumers who 

purchase their annuities. It is also detrimental for all people who sale annuities. This 

law will eliminate a mass amount of small to medium sized business who rely solely 

on commission. Making our unemployment rates go up. I do not feel like the law 

lives up to the definition of "best interest" for the average consumer. It will 

make it more difficult for middle to lower class individuals to save for 

retirement. I do not think laws should take away the right for Americans to 

choose products that they feel meet their needs. This is basically making our 

consumers to choose to either pay for advice or to do it by themselves, which i 

feel is wrong. Consumers should have a risk free options for their 

investments. Making consumers put their funds in investments where they 

have potential to lose everything is not right. All in all i do not feel this is a 

beneficial law and will harm the middle class and an entire distribution system 

comprised of good intention, hard-working Americans.

Sincerely,

Sara Richardson
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth

in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 27, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-30877

Summary Calendar

GERALD WAYNE ZILLS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport

USDC No. 5:05-CV-452 

--------------------

Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gerald Wayne Zills filed a claim under the Social Security Act for

Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. The

Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denied Zills’s claim and the Appeals

Council affirmed the decision of the ALJ. Treating the decision of the

Appeals Council as the final decision of the Commissioner of Social
Security, Zills filed suit in the district court for the Western District of

Louisiana seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision. 

Specifically, Zills argues that the ALJ erred by defining “moderate” mental

limitations for the vocational expert in a way that implies that one with such

limitation can still perform the task satisfactorily. The case was referred to a

Magistrate Judge who reviewed the record and briefs submitted by both

parties. The Magistrate Judge affirmed the Commissioner’s decision to

deny benefits. After considering and denying Zills’ motion to alter or amend

the judgment, the Magistrate Judge entered final judgment denying any

relief to Zills. Zills appeals to this Court. 

Our review is limited to determining (1) whether there is substantial

evidence in the record as a whole to support the Commissioner’s decision,

and (2) whether the Commissioner’s decision comports with relevant legal

standards. Jones v. Apfel, 174 F.3d 692, 693 (5th Cir. 1999). We have

carefully reviewed the briefs, record excerpts, and relevant portions of the

record itself. For the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum

Ruling, we affirm the decision of the district court to enter final judgment

against Zills.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit No. 21.1**

 

 **SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**

**As of December 31, 2010**

1.       PHI Capital Holdings, Inc. 

Percentage of ownership: 100%

Business activity:  Consulting and M&A advisory services

 

2.       Providential Vietnam, Ltd.

Percentage of ownership: 100%

Business activity: Consulting

 

3.       Philand Ranch Limited –  UK

Percentage of ownership: 58.28%

Business activity: real estate development

 

4.       PHI Gold Corp.  (formerly PHI Mining Group, Inc.)

Percentage of ownership: 82.71%

Business activity: Gold mining

 

5.       PHI Energy Corporation (formerly Providential Energy Corporation)

Percentage of ownership: 100%

Business activity: Independent Oil & Gas

 

6.       Provimex, Inc

Percentage of ownership: 85%

Business activity: Trading and Imports/Exports

 

7.       Touchlink Communications, Inc.

Percentage of ownership: 85%

Business activity: Multi-media

 

 

----
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0652 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Sara C Waters 

Address: 

104 Pinewood Place 

Emerald Isle, 28594 

Email: sallywaters@ec.rr.com 

Phone: 252-354-4722 

Organization: NAMI NC 

General Comment 

On behalf of NAMI NC Coastal Division, I am writing to submit comments on the Interim Final 

Rules under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act 

of 2008 and in doing so NAMI NC Coastal Division endorses the separate comments submitted by 

the Parity Implementation Coalition and the National Alliance on Mental Illness” 

With our other members I look forward to regulations to support parity for mental health 

consumers . 

Sara Waters 

President 

NAMI NC Coastal Division 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: April 30, 2010 

Received: April 30, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ae4a2f 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 4/30/2010
City of 

S^lin ^ February 17, 2010 

\\\'.j r 

City-County Building 

300 West Ash Street 

P.O. Box 736 

Salina, KS 67402-0736 

CITY COMMISSION 

M. LUCI LARSON, MAYOR 

SAMAIVfTHA P. ANCELL 

THOMAS K. ARPKE 

NORMAN M. JENNINGS 

AARON C. PECK 

CITY MANAGER 

JASON A. CAGE 

DEPUTY CITY MANAGER 

MICHAEL D. SCHRACE 

TELEPHONE (785) 309-5700 

mCSIMILE (785) 309-5711 

EMAIL: titiftQtnnni«ionftMrina,oft 

WEBSITE: www.salina-ks.gw 

Mr. Todd M. Horman 

Director 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Essential Air Service at Salina, Kansas 

Docket DOT-OST 2002 -11376 

Dear IVIr. Horman: 

The Salina community welcomes the opportunity to submit comments 

regarding proposals from air carriers interested in providing essential air 

service at Salina, Kansas. A work group comprised of representatives of 

the City of Salina, Saline County, the Salina Airport Authority, Salina Area 

Chamber of Commerce, Kansas State University at Salina and the 

Kansas National Guard has reviewed all four proposals received by the 

U.S. DOT. The Salina work group also met with representatives of 

Sovereign Air, SeaPort Airlines and Great Lakes Airlines. 

After much deliberation, it is the opinion of local political and civic leaders 

that the SeaPort Airlines proposal will best meet Salina's scheduled air 

service needs. The SeaPort proposal provides DOT the opportunity to 

select an air carrier that will provide the following: 

1. Greater frequency of flights for the Salina market with three 

nonstop round trips a day (18 a week) to MCI. 

2. An aircraft (the Pilatus PC-12) that is "right-sized" for the Salina 

market. 

3. Access to the Kansas City hub that is served by a low-cost 

airline. 

4. An SLN-MCI fare structure that will encourage area residents to 

fly rather than drive. 

5. An aggressive marketing and customer service plan for the 

Salina market. 

6. The availability of a military/government fare to better facilitate 

air travel to and from the growing Kansas National Guard's 

Great Plains Joint Training Center. 

7. An airline that will be actively involved in community events and 

contribute to economic growth. 

MEMBER .. . LEAGUE OF KANSAS MUNICIPALITIES • NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 
Mr. Todd M. Horman 

Page 2 

In submitting these comments, Salina requests that the U.S. DOT waive the EAS 

program requirements for service at Salina with a multi-engine aircraft of at least 15 

passenger seats. Salina agrees to SeaPort EAS flight operations in the 9-seat Pilatus 

PC-12 aircraft. 

Salina leadership is committed to partner with SeaPort to make significant 

improvements to our local air service. Our joint efforts will result in increased passenger 

enplanements and a positive economic airport to our region. 

Thank you for considering our comments as your office finalizes the 2010 - 2012 EAS 

contract for Salina. 

Respectfully submitted, 

CITY OF SALINA 

/bi:^^'c,f^-^^ 

M.M=uci Larson -^ 

Mayor 

MLL/TFR/ge 

cc: Governor Mark Parkinson 

Senator Sam Brownback 

Senator Pat Roberts 

Congressman Jerry Moran
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, October 19, 1995 (131), Para 131.9 Message from the President]
[Page 1555]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.131.9  message from the president

  A message in writing from the President of the United States was 
communicated to the House by Mr. Edwin Thomas, one of his secretaries.

  The Committee resumed its sitting; and after some further time spent 
therein,
```
From: Stan Nackdymon [mailto:rostan01@gmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 4:52 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Stay out of my retirement investing
§ 299.355 Personnel qualified to inspect track. Each individual designated to inspect track for defects, shall have— ( a ) Successfully completed a course offered by the railroad or by a college level engineering program, supplemented by special on-the-job training emphasizing the techniques to be employed in the inspection of high-speed track;
( b ) Demonstrated to the railroad, at least once per calendar year, that the individual— ( 1 ) Knows and understands the requirements of this subpart that apply to the inspection of the track for which he or she is responsible;
( 2 ) Can detect deviations from those requirements; and
( 3 ) Can prescribe appropriate remedial action to correct or safely compensate for those deviations.
( c ) Written authorization from the railroad or the employer to prescribe remedial actions to correct or safely compensate for deviations from the requirements in this subpart and shall have successfully completed a recorded examination on this subpart as part of the qualification process.
-----Original Message----- 

From: davidm31@hotmail.com [mailto:davidm31@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:22 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

David MARRIOTT 

1260 11 Mile Rd. 

Berkley, MI 48072
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

NICHOLE ASHLEY COLLINS,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2441 Disciplinary Docket

No. 207 DB 2017

Attorney Registration No. 307141

(Dauphin County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12 th day of March, 2018, upon consideration of the Verified

Statement of Resignation, Nichole Ashley Collins is disbarred on consent from the Bar

of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, see Pa.R.D.E. 215, and she shall comply with

the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217. Respondent shall pa y costs to the Disciplinary Board

pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
§ 209.405 Reporting of remedial actions. ( a ) Except as provided in § 209.407, each railroad that has received written notification on Form FRA F 6180.96 from an FRA Safety Inspector both that assessment of a civil penalty will be recommended for the railroad's failure to comply with a provision of the Federal railroad safety laws and that it must submit a remedial actions report, shall report on this form all actions that it takes to remedy that failure. The railroad shall submit the completed form to the FRA Safety Inspector within 30 days after the end of the calendar month in which the notification is received. ( 1 ) *Date of receipt of notification.* If the FRA Safety Inspector provides written notification to the railroad by first class mail, then for purposes of determining the calendar month in which notification is received, the railroad shall be presumed to have received the notification five business days following the date of mailing.
( 2 ) *Completion of Form FRA F 6180.96, including selection of railroad remedial action code.* Each railroad shall complete the remedial actions report in the manner prescribed on the report form. The railroad shall select the one remedial action code on the reporting form that most accurately reflects the action or actions that it took to remedy the failure, such as, repair or replacement of a defective component without movement, movement of a locomotive or car for repair (where permitted) and its subsequent repair, completion of a required test or inspection, removal of a noncomplying item from service but not for repair (where permitted), reduction of operating speed (where sufficient to achieve compliance), or any combination of actions appropriate to remedy the noncompliance cited. Any railroad selecting the remedial action code “other remedial actions” shall also furnish FRA with a brief narrative description of the action or actions taken.
( 3 ) *Submission of Form FRA F 6180.96.* The railroad shall return the form by first class mail to the FRA Safety Inspector whose name and address appear on the form.
( b ) Any railroad concluding that the violation alleged on the inspection report may not have occurred may submit the remedial actions report with an appropriate written explanation. Failure to raise all pertinent defenses does not foreclose the railroad from doing so in response to a penalty demand.
Exhibit 35.3


COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


OF


THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY, AS SERVICER


The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the duly elected and acting Vice President and Treasurer of The Toledo Edison Company, as servicer (the “ Servicer ”) under the Phase-In-Recovery Property Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2013 (the “ Servicing Agreement ”), between the Servicer and TE Funding LLC, as Bond Issuer, and further certifies on behalf of the Servicer that:


1. A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement during the period that commenced January 1, 2023 and ended December 31, 2023 has been made under the supervision of the undersigned pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Servicing Agreement; and


2. To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Servicing Agreement throughout the period that commenced January 1, 2023 and ended December 31, 2023.


Executed as of this 29th day of March 2024.





THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANYBy:/s/ Steven R. StaubName:Steven R. StaubTitle:Vice President and Treasurer
From: krisepoo@hotmail.com [mailto:krisepoo@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:19 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Karen Miller 

129 Martha Drive 

Corpus Christi, TX 78418