alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: raso@blackfoot.net [mailto:raso@blackfoot.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:12 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Raso Hultgren 

P.O. Box 8633 

Missoula, MT 59807
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly report of Oasis Online Technologies Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Erik Cooper, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Oasis Online Technologies Corp. and will be retained Oasis Online Technologies
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




Date:
      February 14, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Erik
      CooperErik
      CooperPrincipal
      Executive Officer
§ 224.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to reduce highway-rail grade crossing accidents and deaths, injuries, and property damage resulting from those accidents, by enhancing the conspicuity of rail freight rolling stock so as to increase its detectability by motor vehicle operators at night and under conditions of poor visibility.
( b ) In order to achieve cost-effective mitigation of collision risk at highway-rail grade crossings, this part establishes the duties of freight rolling stock owners (including those who manage maintenance of freight rolling stock, supply freight rolling stock for transportation, or offer freight rolling stock in transportation) and railroads to progressively apply retroreflective material to freight rolling stock, and to periodically inspect and maintain that material. Freight rolling stock owners, however, are under no duty to install, clean or otherwise maintain, or repair reflective material except as specified in this part.
( c ) This part establishes a schedule for the application of retroreflective material to rail freight rolling stock and prescribes standards for the application, inspection, and maintenance of retroreflective material to rail freight rolling stock for the purpose of enhancing its detectability at highway-rail grade crossings. This part does not restrict a freight rolling stock owner or railroad from applying retroreflective material to freight rolling stock for other purposes if not inconsistent with the recognizable pattern required by this part.
§ 240.401 Review board established. ( a ) Any person who has been denied certification, denied recertification, or has had his or her certification revoked and believes that a railroad incorrectly determined that he or she failed to meet the certification requirements of this part when making the decision to deny or revoke certification, may petition the Federal Railroad Administrator to review the railroad's decision.
( b ) The Administrator has delegated initial responsibility for adjudicating such disputes to the Operating Crew Review Board.
( c ) The Operating Crew Review Board shall be composed of employees of the Federal Railroad Administration selected by the Administrator.
[85 FR 81318, Dec. 15, 2020]
Attachment 1

Chesterfield Site Visit PresentationAttachment 2

Picture of Chesterfield’s Permitted Outfalls and Water Balance Diagram

### Chesterfield Power Station

Permitted Out/ails

VPDES Permit No. VA0004146Attachment 3

FGD System Process Flow Diagram and Pictures of the Dual F low TraysAttachment 4

Process Flow Diagram of the FGD Wastewater Treatment System
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT CARL P. WAGNER AND MAY CAROL WAGNER, HIS WIFE, AND JAMES R. WAGNER

v. LARRY G. KNAPP AND BEVERLY M. KNAPP, HIS WIFE

v. SPENCER, GLEASON, HEBE & RAGUE PETITION OF: LARRY G. KNAPP AND BEVERLY M. KNAPP, HIS WIFE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 810 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 6th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Max & Ermas Restaurants,
Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):
 28




---



##### 



a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: June 20, 2008/s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr.William C. Niegsch, Jr.,Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of Max & Ermas Restaurants, Inc.
 
 29
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Sterling Gas Drilling Fund 1982 (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles E. Drimal Jr., Chief Executive Officer of PrimeEnergy Management Corporation, the Managing General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

/s/ Charles E. Drimal Jr.

-----------------------------

Chief Executive Officer

November 5, 2004

 

 

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Sterling Gas Drilling Fund 1982 (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Beverly A. Cummings, Chief Financial Officer of PrimeEnergy Management Corporation, the Managing General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

/s/ Beverly A. Cummings

------------------------------

Chief Financial Officer

November 5, 2004
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 19, 1995 (97), Para 97.23 Order of Business--Consideration of H.R. 1976]
[Page 1159]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.97.23  order of business--consideration of h.r. 1976

  On motion of Mr. SKEEN, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That it may be in order during further consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1976) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural 
Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs 
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes, 
pursuant to House Resolution 188, the chairman of the Committee of the 
Whole may postpone until a time during further consideration in the 
Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment, 
and that the chairman of the Committee of the Whole may reduce to not 
less than five minutes the time for voting by electronic device on any 
postponed question that immediately follows another vote by electronic 
device without intervening business, provided that the time for voting 
by electronic device on the first in any series of questions shall not 
be less than fifteen minutes.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7306

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RICHARD COREY HARRISON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CR-93-418-WMN, CA-95-1230-WMN)

Submitted: January 7, 1997 Decided: January 31, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Corey Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Bonnie S. Greenberg,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Harrison, Nos.

CR-93-418-WMN; CA-95-1230-WMN (D. Md. Aug. 8, 1996). Appellant's

motion to have appeal heard on Appellant's brief is denied. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 206 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 206

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that persons retiring 
  from the Armed Forces shall be entitled to all benefits which were 
           promised them when they entered the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Condit introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that persons retiring 
  from the Armed Forces shall be entitled to all benefits which were 
           promised them when they entered the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT OF MILITARY RETIREES TO BENEFITS PROMISED UPON 
              ACCESSION.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 34 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 1031 the following new section:
``Sec. 1031a. Entitlement to retirement benefits: persons first 
              becoming members of the armed forces on or after date of 
              enactment of section
    ``(a) Explanation of Retirement Benefits.--In the case of any 
person who first becomes a member of the armed forces on or after the 
date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary concerned shall 
ensure that the person, upon first becoming a member of the armed 
forces, is provided a written statement describing the benefits that, 
under then-current laws and regulations, will be provided to that 
person if that person is subsequently retired from the armed forces. 
Such statement shall be in clear and concise language and shall explain 
any limitation or qualification on the receipt of those benefits (such 
as, in the case of medical and dental care, the availability of staff 
and facilities). However, any such limitation or qualification may not 
include a statement of reservation of the right to change any such 
benefit (either by law or regulation).
    ``(b) Entitlement to Retirement Benefits.--Any person who receives 
a statement of retirement benefits under subsection (a) and who 
subsequently retires from the armed forces shall be entitled, upon that 
retirement, to the benefits as described in that statement.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
1031 the following new item:

``1031a. Entitlement to retirement benefits: persons first becoming 
                            members of the armed forces on or after 
                            date of enactment of section.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Fred Gebhardt, Appellant.

(Argued March 28, 1911;

decided April 25, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, rendered October 21, 1910, at a Trial Term for the county of Suffolk, upon a verdict convicting the defendant -of the crime of murder in the first degree.

*E. J. Reilly, Nathan O. Petty*and *John R. Vunh*for appellant.

*George H. Furman, District Attorney,*for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion is written because the guilt is clear and there is no point raised against the judgment below that requires or is worthy of discussion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., G-ray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ.
-----Original Message----- 

From: haysukia@gmail.com [mailto:haysukia@gmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 2:48 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Evelyn Hamilton 

330 State Rd 

Princeton, NJ 08540
§ 23.21 Who must submit an ACDBE program to FAA, and when? ( a ) If you are a primary airport and receive FAA financial assistance, you must submit an ACDBE program plan meeting the requirements of this part to the FAA for approval. ( 1 ) The recipient must submit this program plan on the same schedule as provided for in 23.45(a) of this part.
( 2 ) Timely submission and FAA approval of a recipient's ACDBE program plan is a condition of eligibility for FAA financial assistance.
( b ) If you are a primary airport that does not have an ACDBE program, and you apply for a grant of FAA funds for airport planning and development under 49 U.S.C. 47107 *et seq.,* you must submit an ACDBE program plan to the FAA at the time of your application. Timely submission and FAA approval of your ACDBE program are conditions of eligibility for FAA financial assistance.
( c ) If you are the owner of more than one airport that is required to have an ACDBE program, you may implement one plan for all your locations. However, you must establish a separate ACDBE goal for each airport.
( d ) If a recipient makes any significant changes to their ACDBE program at any time, the recipient must provide the amended program to the FAA for approval before implementing the changes.
( e ) If a recipient is a non-primary airport, non-commercial service airport, a general aviation airport, reliever airport, or any other airport that does not have scheduled commercial service, it is not required to have an ACDBE program. However, the recipient must take appropriate outreach steps to encourage available ACDBEs to participate as concessionaires whenever there is a concession opportunity.
[89 FR 24958, Apr. 9, 2024]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, September 12, 1995 (113), Para 113.31 Senate Bill Referred]
[Page 1329]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.113.31  senate bill referred

  A bill of the Senate of the following title was taken from the 
Speaker's table and, under the rule, referred as follows:

       S. 790. An Act to provide for the modification or 
     elimination of Federal reporting requirements; to the 
     Committee on Government Reform and Oversight.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-09-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,363
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      604
<ALLOWANCES>                                         9
<INVENTORY>                                        219
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,372
<PP&E>                                           1,640
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,923
<OTHER-SE>                                          (4)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,210
<SALES>                                          2,071
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,071
<CGS>                                              191
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  48
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    472
<INCOME-TAX>                                       189
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                284
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       284
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        


</TABLE>
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Annual

2011 17855

Civilian noninstitutional population

Number in thousands

75 years and over

2011 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU00024942Q

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Population Level - 75 yrs. & over

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:10:18 PM)
§ 199.115 Contractor employees. With respect to those employees who are contractors or employed by a contractor, an operator may provide by contract that the drug testing, education, and training required by this part be carried out by the contractor provided: ( a ) The operator remains responsible for ensuring that the requirements of this part are complied with; and
( b ) The contractor allows access to property and records by the operator, the Administrator, and if the operator is subject to the jurisdiction of a state agency, a representative of the state agency for the purpose of monitoring the operator's compliance with the requirements of this part.
[53 FR 47096, Nov. 21, 1988. Redesignated by Amdt. 199-19, 66 FR 47118, Sept. 11, 2001]