alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 220.309 Permitted uses; exceptions to other restrictions. Notwithstanding any other limitations in this subpart, a railroad operating employee may use the following, if that use does not interfere with any employee's performance of safety-related duties— ( a ) The digital storage and display function of an electronic device to refer to a railroad rule, special instruction, timetable, or other directive, if such use is authorized under a railroad operating rule or instruction.
( b ) An electronic device as necessary to respond to an emergency situation involving the operation of the railroad or encountered while performing a duty for the railroad.
( c ) An electronic device to take a photograph of a safety hazard or a violation of a rail safety law, regulation, order, or standard, provided that— ( 1 ) A camera that is part of a cell phone or other similar multi-functional electronic device is not included in this exception unless it is a railroad-supplied device and is used for an authorized business purpose;
( 2 ) The camera, unless otherwise permitted, is turned off immediately after the documentation has been made; and
( 3 ) If the camera is used in the cab of a moving train, the use is only by a crewmember other than the locomotive engineer.
( d ) A stand-alone calculator if used for an authorized business purpose.
( e ) A medical device that is consistent with the railroad's standards for medical fitness for duty.
( f ) A wireless communication device to conduct train or switching operations if the railroad operating employee is part of a crew assigned to a train that is exempt under § 220.9(b) from the requirement of a working radio when the employing railroad has fewer than 400,000 annual employee work hours.
**Exhibit 99.2**

**Certification pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Reportof Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Debbie Walker, Principal Financialand Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--|----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  |    |  |
|  | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|  |  |        |                                                                                                                                           |
|--|--|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  |  |   | /s/ DEBBIE WALKER**Debbie Walker, Senior Vice president****(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)**
Date: November 12, 2002
24 |
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2197

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to establish a point of

order against certain continuing resolutions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 4, 1995

Mr. ALLARD (for himself, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, and Mr. ENSIGN) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

A BILL

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to establish

a point of order against certain continuing resolutions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) title III of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974

4 is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

5 ‘‘POINT OF ORDER AGAINST CERTAIN CONTINUING

6 RESOLUTIONS

7 ‘‘SEC. 314. It shall not be in order in the House of

8 Representatives or the Senate to consider any bill or joint

9 resolution making continuing appropriations for all or part

10 of a fiscal year unless it provides that the amount which
2

•HR 2197 IH

1 would be made available or the authority which would be

2 granted respecting any pertinent project or activity (ex3 cept appropriated mandatory spending) shall be continued

4 at a rate of operations not exceeding the lower of—

5 ‘‘(1) ninety-five percent of the current rate; or

6 ‘‘(2) if the applicable regular appropriation Act

7 has passed both Houses, then the lowest rate per8 mitted by either version of that Act, except that if

9 the project or activity is funded in only one such ver10 sion, that project or activity shall be continued

11 under the authority granted by the one House.’’.

12 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con13 tents set forth in section 1(b) of the Congressional Budget

14 and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is amended by in15 serting after the item relating to section 313 the following

16 new item:

‘‘Sec. 314. Point of order against certain continuing resolutions.’’.

Æ
From: calamityjg@aol.com [mailto:calamityjg@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:07 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jana Grover 

2221 Pelham Pl 

Oakland, CA 94611
**Relevant Meetings**  **with External Stakeholders since Publication of the 2013 Final HCF** **C Allocation**  **Rule :** 

April 25, 2013 – Meeting with representatives from the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) May 7, 2013 – Meeting with representatives from National Refrigerants May 14, 2013 – Meeting with representatives from the Alliance for Responsible Atmospheric Policy May 14, 2013 – Meeting with representatives from Hudson Technologies * May 21, 2013 – Meeting with representatives from Heating, Air- conditioning & Refrigeration Distributors International (HARDI) May 22, 2013 – Meeting with representatives from DuPont * May 28, 2013 – Meeting with representatives from Arkema June 3, 2013 – Meeting with representatives from Air- Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigerati on Institute (AHRI) June 6, 2013 – Meeting with representatives of Honeywell * June 20, 2013 – Meeting with representatives from Combs Gas, Inc. July 25 , 2013 – Meeting with representatives from DuPont August 8, 2013 – Meeting with representatives of Honeywell August 22, 2013 – Meeting with representatives from Hudson Technologies September 24 – Meeting with representatives from Watsco November 1, 2013 – Meeting with representatives from Williams & Associates and USA Refrigerants November 6, 2013 – Meeting with representatives from Arkema November 7, 2013 – Meeting with representatives from Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) November 12, 2013 – Meeting with representatives from Honeywell November 14, 2013 – Meeting with representatives from Heating, Ai r-conditioning & Refrigeration Distributors International (HARDI) November 20 – Meeting with representative from EOS Climate* *These companies provided Confidential Business Information to EPA at their meeting or in subsequent correspondence. This documen t does not reflect meetings held at the Office of Management and Budget while the rule was being reviewed in accordance with E.O. 12866 and E.O. 13563 . For a list of those meetings and the participants, please visit http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/oira_2060_meetings/ .
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0058 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Nina T. Brollier 

Address: 

4276 Soth Main Steet 

Murray, UT, 84107 

Email: nbrollie@gmail 

Phone: 801-664-8229 

Organization: Insurance Company 

General Comment 

I believe that Mental Health Care should be equal to other health care benefits. 

Many illnesses can be caused by mental health conditions and the proper and 

affordable care of the mental health conditions can reduce or prevent some 

physical health problems as well. A great example of how denial or lack of care for 

mental health conditions is the number of post tramautic veterans in or returned 

home from Irag. Mental Health problems create a far more critical impact on 

families than physical conditions. Co-payments, exclusions or limits should be 

fair and as affordable as all heath care coverage.My family has some mental 

health conditions and I have a son who has struggled for years. I don't know 

anyone who has not had these problems affect their lives or their families.

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 15, 2009 

Received: May 14, 2009 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 809920df 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web
§ 174.20 Local or carrier restrictions. ( a ) When local conditions make the acceptance, transportation, or delivery of hazardous materials unusually hazardous, local restrictions may be imposed by the carrier.
( b ) Each carrier must report to the Bureau of Explosives for publication the full information as to any restrictions which it imposes against the acceptance, delivery, or transportation of hazardous materials, over any portion of its lines under this section.
[Amdt. 174-26, 41 FR 16092, Apr. 15, 1976]
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,513

EX PARTE FREDERICK JORDAN BATTS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1091244-B IN THE 232 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ND

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of engaging in

organized criminal activityand sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court

of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Batts v. State, No. 14-07-00865-CR (Tex. App. – Houston [14th

Dist.] November 17, 2009). 

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance

because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed, thereby
2

denying Applicant the opportunity to petition this Court for discretionary review. 

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court

has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to notify Applicant

of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se, advising him instead that he saw no grounds

for a petition for discretionary review. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte

Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the

opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fourteenth

Court of Appeals in Cause No. 14-07-00865-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case No. 1091244

from the 232nd Judicial District Court of Harris County. Applicant shall file his petition for

discretionary review with the Fourteenth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this

Court’s mandate issues.

Applicant's remaining claims are dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1997).

Delivered: March 9, 2011

Do not publish
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 9:07 AM

To: 'jadams@uasdevelopment.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Information: Unma nned Aerial Systems Development, Inc.

(FAA-2015-0912)



### June 4, 2015

Dear Mr. Adams:

This letter is to inform you th at the following information is mi ssing from your petition (Docket No.

FAA

− 2015

− 0912). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft makes, mode ls, and types (i.e., fixed-wing, roto rcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The descriptions shou ld include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manuals.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the in formation described above by June 18, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we w ill close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
#### George H. Lemist, Appellant, v. William Watson and others, Respondents.

Motion for new trial denied, and judgment ordered for the defendants on the exceptions.
Letter dated March 16, 2006 from the Company to Carolyn Finkle



 Exhibit 10.3 
 

 
 March 16, 2006 
 Dear Carolyn: 
 As you are aware, 33%
($9,667) of your annual bonus has been issued in restricted stock which will vest March 15, 2007. The number of shares issued was calculated using the closing price of Celsion stock on March 15, 2006 ($4.08). The company will issue a
certificate for 2,369 shares of Celsion stock in your name. The company will retain the certificate in safekeeping and release it to you when the restriction has been lifted on March 15, 2007. 
 Sincerely, 
 /s/ Anthony P. Deasey 

 Anthony P. Deasey 

Executive Vice President – Chief Operating Officer 
 Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                EXHIBIT 10(a)


                              THIRD AMENDMENT TO
                          REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT


This Third Amendment to the Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of February
17, 1996 is made by and between The Provider Bank (the "Bank"), an Ohio banking
corporation, doing business at One East Fourth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202,
and Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc. (the "Borrower"), a Delaware corporation,
doing business at 4849 Evanswood Drive, Columbus, Ohio, 43229.

                             W I T N E S S E T H

WHEREAS, the parties hereto have previously entered into that certain Revolving
Credit Agreement dated as of October 25, 1993, which was first amended on
January 17, 1994, and amended the second time on August 25, 1995, (hereinafter
the "RCA"), whereby the Bank made certain loans to Borrower;

WHEREAS, the parties wish to further amend the RCA to provide for changes in
covenants and certain other provisions;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises
contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. The ratio referred to in the last line of Section 6.2 (c) shall be amended
to read "1.25 to 1.

2. Within the Definitions contained in Section 9, the definition of "Fixed
Charges" shall be deleted in its entirety and the following inserted in its
place:
        "FIXED CHARGES" shall mean, for any period, the sum of (a) one fifth of 
the Indebtedness owing the Bank plus (b) the amount of all Indebtedness
(exclusive of Indebtedness owing the Bank) which is or should be classified as
a Current Liability plus (c) rental expense incurred during such period with
respect to non-capitalized leases, all of which shall be determined in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principals consistently applied.

3. Item (d) within the Definition of "Income Available for Fixed Charges"
contained in Section 9, will be modified to read, "$25,000 times the number of
restaurant locations which the Company operates at the date of calculation".

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Amendment to the
Revolving Credit Agreement as of the date first set forth above.

MAX & ERMA'S RESTAURANTS, INC.                  THE PROVIDENT BANK

By: /s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr                  By: /s/ Michael G. Giulioli
   ---------------------------                     ------------------------
   William C. Niegsch, Jr                          Michael G. Giulioli
   Executive Vice President                        Regional Vice President


                                                                        12
H. R. 2204

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

An Act

To extend and reauthorize the Defense Production Act of 1950, and for other

purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defense Production Act Amendments of 1995’’.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS.

Section 717(a) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C.

App. 2166(a)) is amended in the first sentence by striking ‘‘Title

I (except section 104), title III, and title VII (except sections 708,

714, 719, and 721) of this Act, and all authority conferred thereunder shall terminate at the close of September 30, 1995’’ and

inserting ‘‘Title I (except section 104), title III, and title VII (except

sections 708 and 721), and all authority conferred thereunder, shall

terminate at the close of September 30, 1998’’.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZING APPROPRIATIONS FOR TITLE III PROJECTS.

Section 711 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C.

App. 2161) is amended—

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘(a) AUTHORI

ZATION.—’’ and all that follows through ‘‘subsection (c),,’’ and

inserting ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—Except as provided in subsection (b),’’; and

(2) by striking subsections (b), (c), and (d) and inserting

after subsection (a) the following new subsection:

‘‘(b) TITLE III AUTHORIZATION.—There are authorized to be

appropriated for each of the fiscal years 1996, 1997, and 1998,

such sums as may be necessary to carry out title III.’’.

SEC. 4. REPORTS TO THE CONGRESS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The President shall prepare and transmit

to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services of the House

of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and

Urban Affairs of the Senate an interim report and a final report

on proposed legislative modernization of the authorities contained

in the Defense Production Act of 1950.
H. R. 2204—2

(b) TIMING.—The President shall so transmit—

(1) the interim report required by subsection (a), not later

than January 31, 1997; and

(2) the final report required by subsection (a), not later

than September 30, 1997.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2311 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2311

To waive certain prohibitions with respect to nationals of Cuba coming 
     to the United States to play organized professional baseball.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 1995

 Mr. Serrano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on International Relations, and in addition to the Committee 
  on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To waive certain prohibitions with respect to nationals of Cuba coming 
     to the United States to play organized professional baseball.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS.

    (a) Restriction on Embargo Authority.--The authorities of section 
620(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, those authorities under 
section 5(b) of the Trading With the Enemy Act that were being 
exercised with respect to Cuba on July 1, 1977, as a result of a 
national emergency declared before that date, and are being exercised 
on the date of the enactment of this Act, and section 203 of the 
International Emergency Economic Powers Act may not be exercised to 
regulate or prohibit--
            (1) those transactions permitted under section 515.564 of 
        title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on July 1, 
        1994, by or on behalf of a Cuban national who enters the United 
        States from Cuba on a visa issued by the State Department under 
        section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality 
        Act for the purpose of playing organized professional baseball; 
        and
            (2) a Cuban national described in paragraph (1) from 
        returning to Cuba the earnings made in playing organized 
        professional baseball.
    (b) Restriction on Immigration Authority.--The authority contained 
in section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act may not be 
used to deny a visa described in subsection (a)(1) to a Cuban national 
for the purpose of playing organized professional baseball.

SEC. 2. DURATION OF VISA.

    A visa described in section 1(a)(1)--
            (1) shall permit the alien to whom the visa is issued to 
        remain in the United States only for the duration of the 
        baseball season, and
            (2) need not be renewed for subsequent entries into the 
        United States for the duration of a valid contract entered into 
        between the alien and the professional baseball team with which 
        the alien played in the preceding baseball season.
                                 <all>
```