SUPPORTING STATEMENT

FOR PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION

EDICS Tracking and OMB Number: (XXXX) 1810-0021

Revised XX/XX/XXXX

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

A. Justification 

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. 

Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. 

Attach a hard copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation 

mandating or authorizing the collection of information, or you may provide a valid 

URL link or paste the applicable section. Please limit pasted text to no longer than 3 

pages. Specify the review type of the collection (new, revision, extension, 

reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change). If revised, briefly specify 

the changes. If a rulemaking is involved, make note of the sections or changed 

sections, if applicable.

This request makes several technical changes to the information collection previously

approved under clearance number 1810-0021. These technical enhancements provide 

greater flexibility to submitters and add no additional burden. The enhancements are 

identified in Attachment A: “Data Groups for the Electronic Application System for 

Indian Education.

The Office of Indian Education (OIE) of the Department of Education (ED) requests 

clearance for the Indian Education Formula Grant Application authorized under Title VII, 

Part A, Subpart 1 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, as amended (ESEA). 

The Indian Education Formula Grant (CFDA 84.060A), is not competitive or 

discretionary and requires the annual submission of the application from the local 

education agency and or tribe. The funds under this program assist applicants to provide 

Indian students with the opportunity to meet the same challenging state standards as all 

other students and meet the unique educational and culturally related academic needs of 

American Indian and Alaska Native students. The amount of the award for each applicant 

is determined by a formula based on the reported number of American Indian/Alaska 

Native students identified in the application, the state per pupil expenditure, and the total 

appropriation available. 

The information collection is also necessary to meet the Government Performance and 

Results Act (GPRA) requirements.
The collection is authorized by section 7114(a) of the ESEA, 20 USC 7424(a), available 

at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title20/pdf/USCODE-2011-title20-

chap70-subchapVII-partA-subpart1-sec7424.pdf, and by section 4 of the Government 

Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA).

2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except 

for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information 

received from the current collection.

Eligible applicants submit information to describe the project for which funding is 

requested. The information provided by the applicant addresses required documentation 

established by Title VII legislative requirements for this program. The information 

provided in the application includes: the Indian student count, including verification of 

individual student eligibility; data on the assessment of Indian student needs; the purpose 

of the project; a comprehensive project plan that show how the applicant will meet those 

needs, including the objectives, activities, and timelines for the funding period requested; 

qualifications of personnel and professional development provided for them; the results 

of the periodic assessment of all Indian students and how the LEA is responding to those 

findings; evidence of a public hearing; parent committee approval; and program 

assurances. Additionally, as needed, applicants may request a waiver of the limitation to 

5 percent on the use of program funds for administrative purposes or a report on the 

effectiveness of a waiver granted in a previous year. 

Eligible applicants for the Formula Grant program include: LEAs, consortia of LEAs, 

Indian tribes in lieu of LEAs, and Bureau of Indian Education funded schools.

The information collected is used to determine applicant eligibility, allocation, and 

whether the proposed project meets the purpose of the legislation. This application is 

completed in two parts with two established deadlines. The information collected from 

each part ensures all required documents are provided. Projects are funded annually for 

one budget year. 

The information is also used for reporting under GPRA.

3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use 

of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 

forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, 

and the basis for the decision of adopting this means of collection. Also describe any 

consideration given to using technology to reduce burden.
Collection of the information through an electronic system was introduced in December 

2006 for applications for FY 2007 funds as a component of EDFacts, the Department’s 

data system for elementary and secondary education. EDFacts’s Electronic Application 

System for Indian Education (EASIE) has completed six years of implementation. The 

system is Web-based and includes the entire applicant submission process; it features prepopulation of student performance information. Response to EASIE has been 

overwhelmingly positive. A paper submission form is available to those applicants that 

request a waiver of the electronic system due to a lack of Internet access. However, in 

the six years of implementation of EASIE, not a single applicant has requested paper 

submission. As OIE has moved toward more streamlined electronic submissions of 

applications, the EASIE system has been enhanced to accept required documents, 

including the Indian Parent Committee Approval form, and consortium agreements, via 

upload within EASIE.

4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar 

information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes 

described in Item 2 above.

No duplication of effort exists. This information collection requests information 

specifically for the Indian education formula grant program authorized under section 

7111-7119 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Applicants will be required 

to provide information that addresses the statutory purpose and program requirements. 

Student performance information collected by EDFacts, such as state assessment results, 

attendance statistics, and graduation rates, are pre-populated into EASIE so there is no 

additional burden to the applicant. Although there are other Indian education programs in 

the Department, they are authorized under different legislation and their purposes and 

requirements differ from those under this program. 

5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, 

describe any methods used to minimize burden. A small entity may be (1) a small 

business which is deemed to be one that is independently owned and operated and 

that is not dominant in its field of operation; (2) a small organization that is any notfor-profit enterprise that is independently owned and operated and is not dominant 

in its field; or (3) a small government jurisdiction, which is a government of a city, 

county, town, township, school district, or special district with a population of less 

than 50,000.

This information collection requirement does not place a burden on small businesses, notfor-profits organizations or small government jurisdictions, which for this program, may

include Indian tribes applying in lieu of an LEA.
6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is 

not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal 

obstacles to reducing burden.

If this information is not collected, the Department will be unable to make grant awards 

in a timely manner. Applications provide information describing the project for which 

funding is requested. The information collected is necessary to evaluate the applications 

for completeness and to identify funding levels for each of the applications. 

7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be 

conducted in a manner:

 requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than 

quarterly;

Only one application per fiscal year is awarded. Respondents submit the information 

collection annually for each new grant year.

 requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of 

information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

The time period from the date of availability of the information collection, as 

published in the Federal Register, to the date by which respondents must respond 

(i.e., the closing date for Part II which is also published in the Federal Register) will 

not be less than 30 days. 

 requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any 

document;

Respondents are required to submit applications electronically through the web-based 

EASIE system unless they have no Internet connection or inadequate Web access. 

Applicants that meet the exception to submitting an application via EASIE are not 

required to submit more than an original and two copies of any document.

 requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government 

contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;

Respondents will not be required to retain records for more than three years.

 in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and 

reliable results than can be generalized to the universe of study;

The information collection is not connected with a statistical survey.
 requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed 

and approved by OMB;

The information collection is not connected with a statistical survey or statistical data 

classification.

 that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority 

established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data 

security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or that unnecessarily 

impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or

The information collection does not request data that is confidential. 

 requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential 

information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures 

to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.

The information collection does not request data that is of a proprietary nature or 

confidential.

8. As applicable, state that the Department has published the 60 and 30 – day Federal 

Register notices as required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the 

information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments 

received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in 

response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and 

hour burden.

Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on 

the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instruction and record 

keeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be 

recorded, disclosed, or reported.

Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained 

or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years – even if 

the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be 

circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These 

circumstances should be explained.

OIE will publish the appropriate Federal Register Notice to solicit public comment on 

this collection. Because the changes to this collection are minor and technical in nature, 

we do not expect significant comments. However, we plan to provide a copy of the 

information collection to the Department’s National Advisory Council on Indian 

Education prior to their next meeting, for review and comment, in accordance with the 

requirement to consult with representatives of those affected every three years. 
9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than 

remuneration of contractors or grantees with meaningful justification.

No payments or gifts to respondents will be provided.

10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for 

the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy. If personally identifiable 

information (PII) is being collected, a Privacy Act statement should be included on 

the instrument. Please provide a citation for the Systems of Record Notice and the 

date a Privacy Impact Assessment was completed as indicated on the IC Data Form. 

A confidentiality statement with a legal citation that authorizes the pledge of 

confidentiality should be provided. Requests for this information are in accordance 

with the following ED and OMB policies: Privacy Act of 1974, OMB Circular A-108 

– Privacy Act Implementation – Guidelines and Responsibilities, OMB Circular A130 Appendix I – Federal Agency Responsibilities for Maintaining Records About 

Individuals, OMB M-03-22 – OMB Guidance for Implementing the Privacy 

Provisions of the E-Government Act of 2002, OMB M-06-15 – Safeguarding 

Personally Identifiable Information, OM:6-104 – Privacy Act of 1974 (Collection, 

Use and Protection of Personally Identifiable Information). If the collection is 

subject to the Privacy Act, the Privacy Act statement is deemed sufficient with 

respect to confidentiality. If there is no expectation of confidentiality, simply state 

that the Department makes no pledge about the confidentially of the data.

Confidential information is not requested. 

11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as 

sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are 

commonly considered private. The justification should include the reasons why the 

agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the 

information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is 

requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.

Information of a sensitive nature is not requested.

12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The 

statement should:

 Indicate the number of respondents by affected public type (federal government, 

individuals or households, private sector – businesses or other for-profit, private 

sector – not-for-profit institutions, farms, state, local or tribal governments), 

frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the 
burden was estimated, including identification of burden type: recordkeeping, 

reporting or third party disclosure. All narrative should be included in item 12. 

Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain 

information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a 

sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden 

on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, 

or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons 

for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for 

customary and usual business practices.

 If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour 

burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in the ROCIS 

IC Burden Analysis Table. (The table should at minimum include Respondent 

types, IC activity, Respondent and Responses, Hours/Response, and Total 

Hours)

 Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents of the hour burdens for 

collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate 

categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information 

collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be 

included in Item 14.

Estimate of Burden Summary:

Respondents Hours/

response

Total 

Hours

Total Cost Cost calculation

EASIE Part I Student 

Form (ED 506)

10,000

Type: 

Individuals

0.309 3,090

$16,284

10000 x 0.309 x $5.27/hr = 

$16,284.

Note that only Indian students 

who were NOT previously in 

the applicant’s LEA need to fill 

out this form. Additionally, ED 

506 forms are not submitted 

to the Department, but must 

be maintained on file by the 

applicant.

EASIE Part I Student 

Count and Part II 

Project and Budget 

Information

1,300

Type:

Individuals

5 6,500

$114,032

1300 x 4.66 hours x 16.34/hr = 

$98,987

1270 x .33 hours x 35.90/hour 

= $15,045.
Total = $114,032

TOTAL BURDEN 11,300 5.309 9,590 $130,316

Burden Hours

Estimates are based on the following:

During any given grant cycle, approximately 10,000 new ED 506 forms are filled out 

annually and maintained by LEAs. Since ED 506 forms only need to be filled out once 

during a child’s K-12 career these forms reflect the entry of new students into any Indian 

formula grant program minus graduating students. The burden hours associated with each 

new form is .309 hours x 10,000 new forms annually for a total 3,090 burden hours.

On an annual basis, approximately 1,300 applications are submitted. The increase in the 

projected number of applicants from 1,264 to 1,302 is based on the increase in participating 

LEAs that has occurred since the electronic system was implemented. Applicants submit 

once per year which includes both Part I and Part II. The burden hours for EASIE Part I and 

II is based on an average 1,300 yearly applications at 5 hours per submission for a total of 

6,500 burden hours. 

Respondent Costs

The respondent cost estimates are computed using the hourly rates of a GS 5/1 and GS 12/1. 

These hourly rates are comparable to salaries of staff that will perform these functions for the 

respondent (data entry and review and certification).

The cost to respondents for compilation of the information and completion of the application 

is based on the estimated average per year for each type of respondent. Of this time, review 

of instructions, data compilation and entry, and review are included at an average of 4 hours 

40 minutes (= 4.66 hours) and 20 minutes (= .33 hours) for review and certification. See the 

following calculations. 

Student forms: (10,000 x .309 hrs) x $5.27/hr = 16,284

Data entry for Part I & II (1300 x 4.66 hrs) x $16.34/hr = 98,987

Review and certification for Part II (1300 x .33 hrs) x $35.90/hr = 15,045 

$ 130,316

13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record 

keepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any 

hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14.)
There is no additional annual cost burden to respondents and record keepers from this 

collection of information.

 The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and 

start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a total 

operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates 

should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and 

disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of methods used to 

estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, 

expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time 

period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, 

among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing 

computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; 

and acquiring and maintaining record storage facilities.

There are no capital, start up costs, maintenance or purchase of services under this 

collection.

 If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of 

cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of contracting 

out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. 

In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of 

respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public 

comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis 

associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as 

appropriate.

There are no information collection services to be contracted out.

 Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or 

portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory 

compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) 

for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the 

government or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices.

Also, these estimates should not include the hourly costs (i.e., the monetization of 

the hours) captured above in Item 12.

There are no purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof under this 

collection.

Total Annualized Capital/Startup Cost:

Total Annual Costs (O&M): 

Total Annualized Costs Requested:
14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a 

description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification 

of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support 

staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this 

collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 

12, 13, and 14 in a single table.

The EASIE software that collects the applications for the Title VII Indian Education 

Formula Grants is operated and supported under a contract that is a task order under the 

master EDFacts contract. The estimated annual cost of support for the EASIE software 

is $390,000. This includes operations and maintenance and a partner support center that 

assists applicants in the process of submitting.

15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments. Generally, 

adjustments in burden result from re-estimating burden and/or from economic 

phenomenon outside of an agency’s control (e.g., correcting a burden estimate or an 

organic increase in the size of the reporting universe). Program changes result from 

a deliberate action that materially changes a collection of information and generally 

are result of new statute or an agency action (e.g., changing a form, revising 

regulations, redefining the respondent universe, etc.). Burden changes should be 

disaggregated by type of change (i.e., adjustment, program change due to new 

statute, and/or program change due to agency discretion), type of collection (new, 

revision, extension, reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change) and 

include totals for changes in burden hours, responses and costs (if applicable).

An adjustment of +422 hours is requested because the average number of applicants has 

increased by approximately 85/year, likely because of the ease of the current application 

process. There is no additional burden on each applicant. 

This collection extension includes no changes other than those needed to ensure grantees 

meet regulatory requirements issued by the Department. The only change not already

being implemented is the Consortium Member agreement, which we will require lead 

LEA applicants to upload into EASIE. The submission of the Agreement is required by

EDGAR, 34 CFR 75.128. This would affect approximately 43 LEAs (in 2012) 

representing 211 school districts. This change does not represent an increase in burden 

since consortium applicants are already required by EDGAR to have an agreement. . 

Other enhancements include the ability to upload certain required documents such as the 

Indian Parent Committee Approval form and verification of Tribes Applying in Lieu of 

LEAs documentation. These documents were faxed in the past and the ability to upload 

the documents will reduce burden on grantees.
16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for 

tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be 

used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and 

ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication 

dates, and other actions.

Results of the individual information collected will not be published.

17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the 

information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.

Such approval is not being requested.

18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the Certification 

of Paperwork Reduction Act.

There are no exceptions to the certifications.