alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 11:32 AM

Received: July 14, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jze-rmbv

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2282

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Gail America

General Comment

Hands off my hard earned money and the choices I make for it in my retirement years. I choose 

to live free and hate that our government is constantly working to take more and more of my 

freedom away from me.
-----Original Message----- 

From: papaschal@hotmail.com [mailto:papaschal@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 3:04 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Patricia Paschal 

46 Av 

Seattle, WA 98118
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-20-2000
<CASH>                                       1,721,919
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    847,391
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,658,768
<PP&E>                                      63,967,225
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,642,968
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,166,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,485,377
<BONDS>                                     29,836,387
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       255,278
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,589,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,166,627
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,158,721
<CGS>                                        9,008,925
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,114,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,717,633
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             695,245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                788,469
<INCOME-TAX>                                   238,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            550,469
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 45,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   505,469
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE BALANCE SHEET
AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              33
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      496
<ALLOWANCES>                                        31
<INVENTORY>                                         10
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   585<F1>
<PP&E>                                           5,637
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,970
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,298<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              670<F1>
<BONDS>                                            946
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           874
<OTHER-SE>                                         205<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,298<F1>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,157<F1>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,596<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  63
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    500
<INCOME-TAX>                                       189
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                311
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                           16
<NET-INCOME>                                       327
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>RESTATED AS A RESULT OF THE MERGER OF BELL ATLANTIC CORPORATION AND NYNEX
CORPORATION COMPLETED ON AUGUST 14, 1997 AND ACCOUNTED FOR AS POOLING OF
INTERESTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2434 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2434

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the deduction for 
        lobbying expenses in connection with State legislation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 1995

 Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself and Mr. Cardin) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the deduction for 
        lobbying expenses in connection with State legislation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF DEDUCTION FOR LOBBYING EXPENSES IN CONNECTION 
              WITH STATE LEGISLATION.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 162(e) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to denial of deduction for certain 
lobbying and political activities) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``any State legislature or of'' before 
        ``any local council'' in the material preceding subparagraph 
        (A), and
            (2) by striking ``such council'' in subparagraph (B)(i) and 
        inserting ``such legislature, council,''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The paragraph heading of paragraph (2) of 
section 162(e) of such Code is amended by inserting ``State or'' before 
``Local''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid or incurred after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
-----Original Message-----

From: C Mark Simion [mailto:simion13@me.com] 

Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 3:58 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

This is a terrible idea on so many levels. Please veto bill RIN 1210-AB32

Thank you, 

C. Mark Simion
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0638 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Mary Gittins 

Address: 

Highlands Ranch, CO, CO, 

General Comment 

April __, 2010 

Submitted via Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov 

Office of Health Plan Standards and Compliance Assistance 

Employee Benefits Security Administration 

Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20210 

Attention: RIN 1210-AB30 

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 

Department of Health and Human Services 

200 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20201 

Attention: CMS--4140—IFC 

Internal Revenue Service 

Department of the Treasury 

1111 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20224 

Attention: REG-120692-09 

Re: Interim Final Rules under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008; Final Rule 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: April 30, 2010 

Received: April 29, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ae3ecf 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 2

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 4/30/2010
To Whom It May Concern: 

I appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Interim Final Rules under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA), published in the 

February 2, 2010 Federal Register. 

The following comments on specific provisions in the regulations will help strengthen consumer 

protections and ensure that the implementing regulations reflect Congress’ intent to prohibit 

discriminatory limits on mental health and substance use conditions by employer-sponsored and 

other group health plans. 

Non Quantitative Treatment Limitations 

In enacting the MHPAEA, Congress made clear that the goal of this new law was to remedy the 

long history of employers and insurers not providing comparable coverage for mental health and 

substance use conditions relative to the medical and surgical benefits they provide. 

Higher co-payments, deductibles, and other cost-sharing requirements, as well as restrictions on 

the number of outpatient visits and inpatient days covered are only the most obvious examples of 

discriminatory treatment of mental health and substance use care. The provisions in the interim 

final rules describing non quantitative treatment limits respond to the evidence indicating 

Page 2 of 2

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 4/30/2010
Exhibit 10.23



 






Exhibit 10.23




SOMAXON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT




     Reference is made to the Consulting Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated August 25, 2003
by and between Somaxon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) and Terry Cobb (the
“Consultant”). All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
assigned to such terms in the Agreement.



     Whereas, the parties desire to amend certain terms of the Agreement in accordance
with the terms hereof (this “Amendment”).



     Now Therefore, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged by the parties, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound,
agree as follows:




	1.	 	Section 3.a. of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:






	 	a.	 	As compensation for the Services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement from
and after September 23, 2005, the Company shall pay to Consultant the sum of $10,000.00
per month, to be paid monthly on the last calendar day of each month. Compensation for
Consultant’s services rendered during the first and last months shall be calculated on a
pro-rata basis.






	2.	 	Except for the matters set forth in this Amendment, all other terms of the Agreement shall
remain unchanged and in full force and effect.





     In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of March
13, 2006.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CONSULTANT	 	 	 	SOMAXON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ Terrell A. Cobb
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Kenneth M. Cohen	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Terrell A. Cobb
	 	 	 	 	 	Name: Kenneth M. Cohen	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Patrick H. Agan, *Respondent, v.*George W. Hey, Appellant.—

Motion for reargument denied. Memorandum filed with clerk of Onondaga county.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15

Received: July 21, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k3u-424y

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2603

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Stephen W. Bryars, ChFC, CLU, CASL

General Comment

Thanks for the education on the second attempt of the DOL to further degrade financial services 

offered to working Americans. You most likely are a proponent of the DOL's agenda, which is 

misguided.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, William C. Niegsch, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Max & Erma’s Restaurants,Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):
25

 
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     Date: June 21, 2006      /s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr. William C. Niegsch, Jr.,    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial    Officer of Max & Erma’s Restaurants, Inc.  
26
#### Harrison Hoyt, *Respondent, v.*John Green, *Appellant*.

Judgment affirmed.
§ 240.411 Appeals. ( a ) Any party aggrieved by the presiding officer's decision may file an appeal in the presiding officer's docket. The appeal must be filed within 35 days of issuance of the decision. A copy of the appeal shall be served on each party. The appeal shall set forth objections to the presiding officer's decision, supported by reference to applicable laws and regulations and with specific reference to the record. If no appeal is timely filed, the presiding officer's decision constitutes final agency action.
( b ) A party may file a reply to the appeal within 25 days of service of the appeal. The reply shall be supported by reference to applicable laws and regulations and with specific reference to the record, if the party relies on evidence contained in the record.
( c ) The Administrator may extend the period for filing an appeal or a response for good cause shown, provided that the written request for extension is served before expiration of the applicable period provided in this section.
( d ) The Administrator has sole discretion to permit oral argument on the appeal. On the Administrator's own initiative or written motion by any party, the Administrator may grant the parties an opportunity for oral argument.
( e ) The Administrator may remand, vacate, affirm, reverse, alter or modify the decision of the presiding officer and the Administrator's decision constitutes final agency action except where the terms of the Administrator's decision (for example, remanding a case to the presiding officer) show that the parties' administrative remedies have not been exhausted.
( f ) An appeal from an Operating Crew Review Board decision pursuant to § 240.403(d) must be filed in the Board's docket within 35 days of issuance of the decision. A copy of the appeal shall be served on each party. The Administrator may affirm or vacate the Board's decision, and may remand the petition to the Board for further proceedings. An Administrator's decision to affirm the Board's decision constitutes final agency action.
[56 FR 28254, June 19, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 53138, Oct. 12, 1995; 64 FR 60995, Nov. 8, 1999; 74 FR 25175, May 27, 2009; 85 FR 81319, Dec. 15, 2020]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Energizing EPA [electronicresource]: Office of Administration and Resources Management�s newsletter onenergy conservation and sustainable facilities.**
 
SuDoc Number:EP 1.131:
Item Number:0431-J-38 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000591435
 
2002:AugNov
2003:MarJunSepDec
2004:MarJunSepDec
2005:MarJunSepDec
2006:MarJunOctDec
2007:AprSep
2008:Feb
 
September 27, 2018
#### § 234.211 Security of warning system apparatus.

Highway-rail grade crossing warning system apparatus shall be secured against unauthorized entry.
#### Sylvia M. Newman, Administratrix, etc., v. Henry L. Newman as Administrator, etc., and others.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements on the opinion of

Daniels, J.,

at Special Term.
#### Joseph Devlin, Respondent, *v.*The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Appellant.

*Devlin*v. *Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co.,*135 App. Div. 921, affirmed.

(Argued April 4, 1911;

decided April 25, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 31, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of defendant.

*D. A. Marsh*and *George D. Yeomans*for appellant.

• *John M. Ward*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook, Chase and Collin, JJ.
§ 238.317 Class II brake test. ( a ) A Class II brake test shall be performed on a passenger train when any of the following events occurs: ( 1 ) Whenever the control stand used to control the train is changed; except if the control stand is changed to facilitate the movement of a passenger train from one track to another within a terminal complex while not in passenger service. In these circumstances, a Class II brake test shall be performed prior to the train's departure from the terminal complex with passengers;
( 2 ) Prior to the first morning departure of each commuter or short-distance intercity passenger train where a Class I brake test remains valid as provided in § 238.315(a)(1);
( 3 ) When previously tested units (i.e., cars that received a Class I brake test within the previous calendar day and have not been disconnected from a source of compressed air for more than four hours) are added to the train;
( 4 ) When cars or equipment are removed from the train; and
( 5 ) When an operator first takes charge of the train, except for face-to-face relief.
( b ) A Class II brake test shall be performed by a qualified person or a qualified maintenance person.
( c ) Except as provided in § 238.15, a railroad shall not use or haul a passenger train in passenger service from a terminal or yard where a Class II brake test has been performed, or was required by this part to have been performed, with any of the brakes cut-out, inoperative, or defective.
( d ) In performing a Class II brake test on a train, a railroad shall determine that: ( 1 ) The brakes on the rear unit of the train apply and release in response to a signal from the engineer's brake valve or controller of the leading or controlling unit, or a gauge or similar device located at the rear of the train or in the cab of the rear unit indicates that brake pipe pressure changes are properly communicated at the rear of the train;
( 2 ) For MU locomotives that utilize an electric signal to communicate a service brake application and only a pneumatic signal to propagate an emergency brake application, the emergency brake application functions as intended.
( 3 ) The communicating signal system is tested and known to be operating as intended; a tested and operating two-way radio system meets this requirement.
[64 FR 25660, May 12, 1999, as amended at 65 FR 41310, July 3, 2000; 67 FR 19991, Apr. 23, 2002]