alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
i 

.DEmfmylENTOF south benU airport 

v^^g;^3FpRM]ION 

-'-KF I OPERATIONS 

•^0!0 OCT -L| A S: 22 

C^jjTifilLLtl'-; ^S'7)Y' 

'iZlLW^l 

\ 

)) CITY OF WARSAW 

/ ERNEST B. WIGGINS, MAYOR 

P.O. Box 9S3 

War«iiw.lN4S5S1-09S3 

302 E. Mamct Sti««l 

«rww.W3T>3WClty.nBt 

Phon»: S74J72-959S 

F«.: 574-372-9598 

August 25. 2010 

Sexuctnry Ray Lallood 

U.S. Department of"Jransponatiun 

1200 New Jersey Avenue Sf 

Woshinglon, DC .20590 

RE: Support of the South Bend Re^onal Airport Applicatiun for funding 

under the Department of Transportation Smnll Community Air 

Service Development Program, DOT-OI'T-2010-0124 

Dear Mr. Sccrctar\': 

On behalf of the City of Warsaw, i am delighted to support the Small Communiiy Air 

Service l^velopmcnt Crani applicadon submitted by the St. Joseph County Aiip<.>n 

Authority for marketing fiittdLng (o encourage a new carrier to enter the South Bend 

maitct with non-s^op service lo Denver, Colorado. 

Air service development is important for the economic health of our region. Businesses 

and reRidenL<; must have access to the global transportation system ut uOurdable fanes. 

South Bend Regional Airport's importance to the Miehiaoa region cannot be overstated. 

Our qiiaiity of life is linked to the airport's p/owth now and in the future. 

This application is an excellent opportunity for St. Joseph Count)' and Michians to 

leverage scarce resources to help develop air service it the South Bend Regional Airport 

by supporting this application under the Stnall Cuirutsuiiity Air Service Development 

Grant (H-ogram. 

Ilic potential benefit to our community is grcaL We urge you to fully fund the request 

from the South iicnd Regional Airpon. 

Sincerely , 

Ernest B. Wiggins. Mayor 

City of Warsaw 

Eq'jjl OHMTtu^irty fmfjtafmr 

South Bend Regional Airport, South Bend, Indiana 

Small Community Air Service Development Program Proposal - 2010 

56
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending December 1, 2012

|Filer                 | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                                 
|--------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------
|HOPE BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A5          | Hope Bancshares, Inc., Hope, Kansas, to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of ABM Holding Company, parent of The Citizens State Bank, both in Miltonvale, Kansas.                                                  | Newspaper:12/19/2012Federal Register:11/20/2012       
|Newspaper:            | 12/19/2012    
|Federal Register:     | 11/20/2012    
|INTERBANK             | * 18C          | InterBank, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, to merge with Town and Country Bank, Stephenville, Texas, and incident thereto, to establish branches in Stephenville (2), Glen Rose, Granbury, Bluff Dale, and Aledo, all in Texas. | Newspaper:12/24/2012Federal Register:Not applicable   
|Newspaper:            | 12/24/2012    
|Federal Register:     | Not applicable
|KCB BANK              | * Branch       | KCB Bank, Kearney, Missouri, to establish a branch at 110 S. Stewart Road, Liberty, Missouri.                                                                                                                            | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:            | Not available 
|Federal Register:     | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 31.8 Service of complaint. ( a ) Service of a complaint must be made by certified or registered mail or by delivery in any manner authorized by Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Service of a complaint is complete upon receipt.
( b ) Proof of service, stating the name and address of the person on whom the complaint was served, and the manner and date of service, may be made by— ( 1 ) Affidavit of the individual serving the complaint by delivery;
( 2 ) A United States Postal Service return receipt card acknowledging receipt; or
( 3 ) Written acknowledgment of receipt by the defendant or his or her representative.
#### Oliver J. Peck, *Respondent, v.*Bradley Nichols, Appellant.—

Judgment of County Court reversed, and that of Justices’ Court affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
§ 221.17 Movement of defective equipment. ( a ) Whenever the marking device prescribed in this part becomes inoperative enroute, the train may be moved to the next forward location where the marking device can be repaired or replaced.
( b ) Defective rolling equipment which, because of the nature of the defect, can be placed only at the rear of a train for movement to the next forward location at which repairs can be made need not be equipped with marking devices prescribed in this part.
( c ) When a portion of a train has derailed, and a portable marking device is not available, the remainder of the train may be moved to the nearest terminal without being equipped with the marking device prescribed in this part.
#### § 266.25 Waivers and modifications.

The Administrator may, with respect to individual requests, upon good cause shown, waive or modify any requirement of this part not required by law or make any additional requirements the Administrator deems necessary. Procedures for submission and consideration of petitions for waiver or modification are governed by 49 CFR part 211.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

______________________ No. 18

- 10897 Non

- Argument Calendar

______________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:16

- cr
- 00256

- CEM

- TBS

- 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v ersus TROY BENNETT, Defendant

- Appellant.

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

______________________ ( May 10, 2019 ) Before, TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 18-10897 Date Filed: 05/10/2019 Page: 1 of 22 Troy Bennett appeals his 30 0

- month sentence, which the district court imposed pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). We affirm because both of Mr. Bennett’s argum ents are foreclosed by Eleventh C ircuit precedent. See United S tates v. Hill , 799 F.3d 1318, 1323 (11 th Cir. 2015) (holding that a conviction for resisting an officer with violence pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 843.01 is a violent felony under the ACCA’s elements clause); United States v. Smith , 775 F.3d 1262, 1267

- 68 (11 th Cir. 2014) (holding that a conviction for possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 893.13 is a serious drug offense under the ACCA). We recognize Mr. Bennett’s arguments that cases like
Hill and Smith were inco rrectly decided, but we are nevertheless bound to follow
them. See, e.g., Smith v. GTE Corp ., 236 F.3d 1292, 1303 (11 th Cir. 2001).
AFFIRMED. Case: 18-10897 Date Filed: 05/10/2019 Page: 2 of 2
SERVED : FEBRUARY 28 , 201 2 .-l-PARTMEMTO F -OCKETOPrRAIiOM S

• m FE D 7 ^

P 1 ^ i-i 8

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I N TH E MATTE RO F 

### WESTER N TIR E EQUIPMEN T AN D SUPPLY CO. , INC . FA A DOCKE T No . jT O B E ASSIGNED !

(Civi l Penalt y Case ) FDM S No . FAA-201M29 I 

### ORDE RO FDISMISSAL O n Decembe r

13 , 2011 . ih e Federal Aviatio n Administratio n ("Complainant" ) file daComplaint . O n Decembe r 2 , 2011 , Western.Tir e Equipmen t andSuppl y Co. , Inc . ("Respondent" ) ha

dfiledaReques t

fo r Hearing . O n Februar

y 28 , 2012 , Complainan t filedaMotio n to Withdra w Complaint , citin g settlement . 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.21 5 states ; "A t an y tim e before o r

durin g ahearing , a

n agenc y attorne y ma

y withdra w acomplain t

o r part y ma y withdraw areques t

fo r ahearin g withou t th e consen t

o f th e administrativ e la

w judge . I

f a n agenc y attorne y withdraw s th e complain t

or apart y withdraw s th e reques t

fo r ahearin g andth e answer , th e administrativ e la w judg e shal l dismis s th e proceeding s unde r thi s subpar t wit h prejudice. " WHEREFORE , Complainant' s Motio n t o Withdraw Complain t havin g bee n read andconsidered , i

t i s ORDERE D a s follows :1 . Complainant' s Mo(io n t o Wiliidraw Complain t b e an di s licieb y granted ; and 2 . Thi s proceedin g h e andi s heieb y dismisse dwii h picjudicc .

RichardC Goodwi n U.S . Admini.stiaiiv c La

w Judg e Attachmen t

~ Servic e Lis tFDM S No . FAA-20 ] 1-129 ; (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W ) ODD '

ON E COP Y Chri s Deraias , Presiden t Wester n Tir e Equipmen t

andSuppl y Co. , Inc. , Responden t 1480 2 Yorb aCourt Chino,C A 9171 0 TEL : 909-303-488 0 FAX : 909-393-674 7 Christophe r

Merrill , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Western-Pacifi c Region , AWP-7. 3 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles , C A 90009-200 7 TEL : 310-725-710 5 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Legal Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

^ Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n A dmin i strat i on, 60 0 Independenc

e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Wasliington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 . - 2 -
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, October 12, 1995 (127), Para 127.5 Committees and Subcommittees to Sit]
[Page 1507]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.127.5  committees and subcommittees to sit

  On motion of Mr. PACKARD, by unanimous consent, the following 
committees and their subcommittees were granted permission to sit during 
the 5-minute rule today: the Committee on Agriculture, the Committee on 
Banking and Financial Services, the Committee on Commerce, the Committee 
on Economic and Educational Opportunities, the Committee on Government 
Reform and Oversight, the Committee on International Relations, the 
Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Resources, the Committee on 
Science, the Committee on Small Business, and the Committee on Veterans' 
Affairs.
```
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 

Received: July 20, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k37-7udj

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2552

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Haswell Franklin

Address: 

1 Gray Squirrel Ct

Lutherville, MD, 21093

Email: hfranklinjr@financialguide.com

Phone: 4107710134

General Comment

Recently, I helped Janet decide what to do with her 401(k) account when she terminated 

employment. 

The decision was made that rolling the assets into an Individual Retirement Account (IRA) was 

the best choice for Janet. 

I helped Janet decide how to invest the IRA account to best meet Janets financial situation, tax 

status, 

investment objectives, liquidity needs, and risk tolerance. I received commissions from the 

purchase of mutual funds 

and an annuity. Under the current rule, I would be prohibited from providing any of those 

services. 

The likely result would be that Janet would instead just cash out her 401(k) and 

would suffer the tax and the early withdrawal penalty, a wrong decision but one likely if she 

hadnt had access to my services.
The new rules will add tremendous cost and make it impossible to work with "Middle 

Class/Working Americans" 

to help them reach their financial goals.
Docket#: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0895 FRL#: 9491-8 RIN: 2060-AQ-11

This action was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (0MB) for review under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, titled Regulatoty Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Whenever EPA makes publicly available

a regulatory action that was reviewed under E.O. 12866, section 6(a)(3)(E) of the EQ. directs the Agency to also: (1) Make available to the public a copy of the information that was provided to OMB’s Office of Information and

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for review under the E.O., i.e., the text of the draft regulatory action and, if applicable,

an assessment of the potential costs and benefits, as well as additional information for those actions that are

determined to be economically significant under the EQ. (Information requirements are described in sections 6(a)(3)(B) and (C)).

(2) Identify for the public any substantive changes between the draft submitted to OIRA and the action that was

subsequently issued, using a method that is complete, clear, and simple.

(3) Identify for the public those substantive changes made at the suggestion or recommendation of OIRA.

For this regulatory action, were substantive changes made to information reviewed under E.O.12866? [Please check the appropriate answer.]

Q No. [In the docket, include the information identified in item (1) below.]

Yes. [In the docket, include the information identified in items (1) — (3) below.]

Accordingly, the Agency has included this form and the following information in the public

docket for this regulatory action: [Please check the appropriate information.]

(1) A copy of the information that was provided to QIRA for review under the EQ.

(2) Documentation of any substantive changes made to the draft regulatory text that was

submitted to QIRA when compared with what was subsequently made publicly available.The documentation is provided on the pages following this form. Changes made at the

suggestion or recommendation of OIRA, if any, are clearly identified through attribution to QIRA. EPA has used one or more of the following methods to note changes: [Select the appropriate option(s).]

l (a) Redline-Strikeout — A copy of the draft regulatory action submitted, using redline strikeout to show the substantive changes that were made.

Q (b) Hand Markup — A copy of the draft regulatory action submitted, using handwritten notes

to show the substantive changes that were made.

O (c) Note to the file - A document that identifies the substantive changes that were made,

with page and paragraph references to the draft regulatory action that was submitted.

If you have any questions about this regulatory action or this documentation, please call the

contact:

Name: Conrad Chin Email: chin.conrad@epa.gov Phone: 919-541-1512

Revised 05/05/2010
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, July 18, 1995 (96), Para 96.28 Treasury-Postal Service Appropriations, FY 1996]
[Page 1150]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.96.28  treasury-postal service appropriations, fy 1996

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HEFLEY, pursuant to House Resolution 190 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the further consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 2020) making appropriations for the Treasury Department, 
the United States Postal Service, the Executive Office of the President, 
and certain Independent Agencies, for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 1996, and for other purposes.
  Mr. DREIER, Chairman of the Committee of the Whole, resumed the chair; 
and after some time spent therein,
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. RIGGS, assumed the Chair.
  When Mr. DREIER, Chairman, reported that the Committee, having had 
under consideration said bill, had come to no resolution thereon.
```
From: Linda lerman [mailto:linnie4@bendbroadband.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 11:48 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

No more government involvement in investments/investing. I do not support the new rule being 

proposed by the DOL.

Linda Lerman

20661 Cherry Tree Lane

Bend OR 97701

541-617-6182
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 4:57 PM

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jy4-c01m

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2153

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Roberto Pacheco

General Comment

I can handle my own investments, thank you very much. Keep your hands off!
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 234 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 234

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 1996

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make nondischargeable a 
debt for death or injury caused by the debtor's operation of watercraft 
                     or aircraft while intoxicated.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Boating and Aviation Operation 
Safety Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 523(a)(9) of title 11, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``, watercraft, or aircraft'' after ``motor vehicle''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.

    (a) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act 
and the amendment made by section 2 shall take effect on the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by section 2 
shall not apply with respect to cases commenced under title 11 of the 
United States Code before the date of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 4, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 246.201 Time limitations for certification. ( a ) After FRA approves a railroad's signal employee certification program, that railroad shall not certify or recertify a person as a signal employee if the railroad is making: ( 1 ) A determination concerning eligibility under §§ 246.111, 246.113, 246.115, and 246.303 and the eligibility data being relied on was furnished more than one year before the date of the railroad's certification decision;
( 2 ) A determination concerning vision or hearing acuity and the medical examination being relied on was conducted more than 450 days before the date of the railroad's certification decision; or
( 3 ) A determination concerning demonstrated knowledge and the knowledge examination being relied on was conducted more than one year before the date of the railroad's certification decision, or more than two years before the date of the railroad's certification decision if the railroad administers knowledge testing pursuant to § 246.121 at intervals that do not exceed two years.
( b ) The time limitations of paragraph (a) of this section do not apply to a railroad that is making a certification decision in reliance on determinations made by another railroad in accordance with § 246.125.
( c ) Except if a person is designated as a certified signal employee under § 246.105(c) or (d), no railroad shall certify a person as a signal employee for an interval of more than three years.
( d ) Each railroad shall issue each certified signal employee a certificate that complies with § 246.207 no later than 30 days from the date of its decision to certify or recertify that person.
Exhibit 3





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin L. Cornwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.














/s/ Kevin L. Cornwell


Kevin L. Cornwell


Chief Executive Officer


August 5, 2010








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.