alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Benjamin E. Goodale, Respondent, *v.*John B. Carey, Appellant.

*Goodale*v. *Carey,*133 App. Div. 920, affirmed.

(Argued June 16, 1910;

decided September 27, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 12, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract of sale.

*Frederich N. Van Zandt*and *Harry W, Moore*for appellant.

*Ernest W Toolcer*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Absent: Gray, J.
From: amy.frei@hp.com [mailto:amy.frei@hp.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:52 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Amy Frei 

134 Darrington Drive 

Folsom, CA 95630
Order Filed August 23, 2016

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-16-00615-CV

IN RE INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION HOLDING N.V., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-06257

ORDER

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Fillmore, and Schenck

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus. 

We ORDER relator to bear the costs, if any, of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID SCHENCK

 JUSTICE
Re: OIRA has concluded EO 12866 review of Reconsideration of the 2008 

Ozone NAAQS 

Lydia Wegman to: King, Heidi R. 01/06/2010 11:09 AM

Cc: "Mancini, Dominic J.", John Hannon, Karen Martin, Kathy Kaufman, 

Ron Evans, Susan Stone, Thomas Gillis, Tricia Crabtree

Thank you very much Heidi. We appreciate your and Dom's help in getting the rule cleared in a timely 

manner. 

"King, Heidi R." Thank you all for your work on this rule. OIRA h... 01/06/2010 10:00:26 AM

From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

To: Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>, 

John Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia 

Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Susan Stone/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia 

Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Kathy 

Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/06/2010 10:00 AM

Subject: OIRA has concluded EO 12866 review of Reconsideration of the 2008 Ozone NAAQS

Thank you all for your work on this rule. OIRA has concluded review

under EO 12866.

Best regards,

Heidi
#### Cornelius Van Derzee and another, *Respondents, v.*Harmon Slingerland, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

— Judgment modified as to rents and profits in accordance with opinion of Potter, J., and as so modified affirmed, without costs to either party. Order to be settled by Potter, J. Opinion by

Potter, J.
JOHN L. HILL 

Attorney General 

9uPmn-m coun 0w!4np 

P.O. Box 12549 

Aumhl. 7x. 79711 

512479.2901 

The Attorney General of Texas 

November 9, 1977 

Honorable Robert A. Sone 

Attorney at Law 

County Courthouse 

Opinion No. HRe: Whether a 

1088 

county 

Leakey, Texas 70073 may combine justice 

precincts so there are 

only two justice preDear Mr. Sone: cincts in the county. 

You have requested our opinion as to whether a 

county may combine its justice precincts so that there 

are only two justice precincts in the county. You state 

that, at present, Real County has only two justices of 

the peace for its four precincts. 

Article 5, section 18 of the Texas Constitution provides, in pertinent part: 

Each organized county in the State now or 

hereafter existing, shall be divided from 

time to time, for the convenience of the 

people, into precincts, not less than four 

and not more than eight . . . . In each 

such precinct there shall be electedone 

Justice of the Peace and one Constable. . . . 

(Emphasis added). The constitutional requirement regarding 

the minimum number of precincts Is clear, and, as we Observed in Attorney General Opinion H-32 (1973), with respect 

to another portion of article 5, section 18: 

This provision leaves no room for interpretation and it must be obeyed. There 

must be one commissioner from each of 

four precincts, elected by the voters of 

each precinct. 

Id. at 1. See Williams v. Castleman, 247 S.W. 263, 267 (Tex. 

1922)~ StatGx rel. Dowlen v. Rigsby. 43 S.W. 271, 273 (Tex. 

Civ. Ape.), writ ref'd, 43 S.W. 1101 (Tex. 1897). Thus, 

p. 4467 
Honorable Robert A. Sone - Page 2 (H-1088) 

in our opinion, a county must maintain a minimum of four 

justice precincts. 

Furthermore, article 5, section 18 also requires that a 

justice of the peace "shall be elected" in each precinct. In 

the event of a vacancy in the office, article 5, section 28 

directs that it "shall be filled by the Commissioners Court 

until the next succeeding General Election." 

SUMMARY 

A county may not combine its justice precincts so that there are only two justice 

precincts in the county. 

Xery truly yours, 

Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

DALL, First Assistant 

C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman 

Opinion Committee 

jst 

of Texas 

p. 4468
|   | (i) | payments to an Alternate Payee (but in no event to a Participant) at such times and in such amounts as specified in a Domestic Relations Order which is determined by the Company to be valid and which does not require the Plan to pay benefits in excess of the balance of the Participant’s Account.  The Company may require that reasonable expenses incurred and paid by the Company in evaluating the Domestic Relations Order and complying with its terms shall be deducted from the Participant’s Account; |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | to the extent necessary for any Federal officer or employee in the executive branch to comply with an ethics agreement with the Federal government; |
|--------|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (iii) | to the extent reasonably necessary to avoid the violation of an applicable Federal, state, local or foreign ethics law or conflicts of interest law (in accordance with Regulation 1-409A-3(j)(4)(iii)); |
|--------|-------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (iv) | to the extent required to pay employment taxes on base salary deferred under the Plan (in accordance with Regulation 1.409A-3(j)(4)(vi)); |
|--------|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (v) | at any time the Plan fails to meet the requirements of Section 409A (any such payment may not exceed the amount required to be included in income as a result of the failure to comply with Section 409A); |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (vi) | upon the occurrence of any of the circumstances when the Plan is terminated pursuant to Sections 12.1(b) or 13.1 of the Plan; or |
|--------|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (vii) | upon the occurrence of any other events permitted by the provisions of Regulation  1.409A-3(j)(4) or any successor thereto. |
|--------|-------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Charles E. Perkins, *Appellant, v.*Samuel H. Sterrett and William T. Colborn, *Respondents*.

Judgment and order denying new trial reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Cullen, J., not sitting.
IB

Union Calendar No. 182

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 234

[Report No. 104–356]

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make nondischargeable

a debt for death or injury caused by the debtor’s operation of watercraft

or aircraft while intoxicated.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. EHLERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

NOVEMBER 20, 1995

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make

nondischargeable a debt for death or injury caused by

the debtor’s operation of watercraft or aircraft while

intoxicated.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 234 RH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Boating and Aviation

3 Operation Safety Act of 1994 1995’’.

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

5 Section 523(a)(9) of title 11, United States Code, is

6 amended by inserting ‘‘, watercraft, or aircraft’’ after

7 ‘‘motor vehicle’’.

8 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.

9 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub10 section (b), this Act and the amendment made by section

11 2 shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this

12 Act.

13 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—The amendment

14 made by section 2 shall not apply with respect to cases

15 commenced under title 11 of the United States Code be16 fore the date of the enactment of this Act.

Union Calendar No. 182

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 234

[Report No. 104–356]

A BILL

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to

aircraft while intoxicated.caused by the debtor’s operation of watercraft ormake nondischargeable a debt for death or injury

NOVEMBER 20, 1995

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Commitordered to be printed. tee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and
----

| EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002             In connection with the Annual Report of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Robert H. Young, Executive Chairman of the Company (Principal Executive Officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:             (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and             (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Robert H. Young          Robert H. YoungExecutive Chairman(Principal Executive Officer)March 15, 2011 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Central Vermont Public Service Corporation ("CVPS") and will be retained by CVPS and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, that:

 

(1)  The accompanying QuarterlyReport on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2004, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained inthe accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:September 13, 2004

 

 
| /s/ Joseph  C. Christenson |                     | /s/ Timothy  C. Clayton |   |
|----------------------------|--------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Joseph C. Christenson      | Timothy C. Clayton       |
| President                  | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0644 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Gisela Schloss-Birkholz 

Address: 

102 Cedar St. 

Mountain Park, GA, 30075-1139 

Email: blct84@bellsouth.net 

Phone: 770-993-7001 

General Comment 

April __, 2010 

Submitted via Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov 

Office of Health Plan Standards and Compliance Assistance 

Employee Benefits Security Administration 

Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20210 

Attention: RIN 1210-AB30 

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 

Department of Health and Human Services 

200 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20201 

Attention: CMS--4140—IFC 

Internal Revenue Service 

Department of the Treasury 

1111 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20224 

Attention: REG-120692-09 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: April 30, 2010 

Received: April 30, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ae42c0 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 2

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 4/30/2010
Re: Interim Final Rules under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008; Final Rule 

To Whom It May Concern: 

I appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Interim Final Rules under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA), published in the 

February 2, 2010 Federal Register. 

The following comments on specific provisions in the regulations will help strengthen consumer 

protections and ensure that the implementing regulations reflect Congress’ intent to prohibit 

discriminatory limits on mental health and substance use conditions by employer-sponsored and 

other group health plans. 

Non Quantitative Treatment Limitations 

In enacting the MHPAEA, Congress made clear that the goal of this new law was to remedy the 

long history of employers and insurers not providing comparable coverage for mental health and 

substance use conditions relative to the medical and surgical benefits they provide. 

Higher co-payments, deductibles, and other cost-sharing requirements, as well as restrictions on 

the number of outpatient visits and inpatient days covered are only the most obvious examples of 

discriminatory treatment of mental health and substance use care. The provisions in the interim 

final rules describing non quantitative treatment limits respond to the evidence indicating 

Page 2 of 2

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 4/30/2010
From: tvantuyl@mlode.com [mailto:tvantuyl@mlode.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 6:20 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Marie Van Tuyl 

9995 Peppermint Circle 

Jamestown, CA 95327
#### § 236.746 Feature, restoring.

An arrangement on an electro-pneumatic switch by means of which power is applied to restore the switch movement to full normal or to full reverse position, before the driving bar creeps sufficiently to unlock the switch, with control level in normal or reverse position.

[49 FR 3388, Jan. 26, 1984]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           9
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         170,568
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             185
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                23,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    236,901
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         643,261
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           648,027
<LOANS>                                      1,476,024
<ALLOWANCE>                                     24,774
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,755,229
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,946,028
<SHORT-TERM>                                   359,296
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             43,332
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       406,573
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,755,229
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 37,117
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               14,221
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,406
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                52,744
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,040
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,650
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           34,094
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 25,547
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,755
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      12,688
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,688
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                     12,353
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,201
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    89
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 57,113
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                24,530
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,958
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,002
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               24,774
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            13,252
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         11,522
        



</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.412 Inspection of rights-of-way and crossings under navigable waters. ( a ) Each operator shall, at intervals not exceeding 3 weeks, but at least 26 times each calendar year, inspect the surface conditions on or adjacent to each pipeline right-of-way. Methods of inspection include walking, driving, flying or other appropriate means of traversing the right-of-way.
( b ) Except for offshore pipelines, each operator shall, at intervals not exceeding 5 years, inspect each crossing under a navigable waterway to determine the condition of the crossing.
[Amdt. 195-22, 46 FR 38360, July 27, 1981, as amended by Amdt. 195-24, 47 FR 46852, Oct. 21, 1982; Amdt. 195-52, 59 FR 33397, June 28, 1994]