alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Stuart Bronson [mailto:SBronson@davistowle.com] 

Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 3:36 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: 1210-AB32

I am an investment advisor who councils regular Americans on their retirement planning needs. I have 

the Accredited Investment Fiduciary designation.

Your fiduciary stance is completely off base with the logic of what you are trying to accomplish is 

tragically flawed. 40,000 Americans die on our roads each year. Does this make cars evil? Are we to 

take cars away from everyone to save 40,000 lives? Of course not. Yet this is the thrust of your 

proposal. In fact, your proposal will do more harm to a populace that is in dire need of sound advice.

I already treat my clients to the highest standard of care. I provide them disclosure upon 

disclosure. None of them read any of it because it is a tome that could cure insomnia . Do you think for 

a minute that doubling the disclosures is going to make Americans safer from unscrupulous 

people? Absolutely not – we already crossed the tipping point of disclosures being helpful instead of 

harmful.

Do not handcuff the good guys doing meaningful good for of average Americans who already 

desperately need competent help. Do not spin your anecdotal evidence and stories of con artists as 

truth. My clients are completely uninterested in learning the ins and outs of investing on their own and 

they surely do not want the government making these decisions for them.

Instead, why don’t you create differing levels of stepped up advice – from a stock broker looking to sell 

stock without knowing anything about his customer all the way up to a true fiduciary acting in the 

client’s best interest. A one paragraph disclosure could be given to the client/customer which simply 

states the level of service that the advisor performs:

“I am a stock broker. I make no warranty that the stocks that I sell you are in your best financial 

interest. I earn a commission on the sale of stock.”

“I am an agent of XYZ insurance company. I must meet annual quotas for proprietary products in order 

to keep my agent’s contract and I do that with commission based products.”

“I am an employee of ABC brokerage firm. I will supply you with advice and products that are suitable 

for your circumstances. I look to my firm’s products first to satisfy your needs which may be commission 

based or fee based.”

“I am a fiduciary advisor who is required to put your interests ahead of my own or my firm’s. I must 

provide a due diligence of care recognized by industry standards whenever I render advice or product 

recommendations to you. I must disclose all conflicts of interest to you. I am compensated through fee 

based planning and financial management. Occasionally I recommend a commission based product 

where there is not a suitable fee based alternative and I will inform you when that is the case.”

You get the idea. . . Something along these lines should not be too difficult.

Sorry, guys, but you fiduciary proposal borders on the absurd (and I am not trying to insult you).

Stuart Bronson

Contoocook, NH
#### UNITED CIGARETTE MACH. CO., Limited, v. WRIGHT.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

March 12, 1912.)

No. 1,072.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.

See, also, 156 Fed. 244.

Fred Harper, for appellant.

A. R. Long and Wm. P. Bynum (Harrison & Long, on the briefs), for appellee.

Before PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge, and DAYTON and ROSE, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

A careful consideration of the assignments of error filed herein impels us to the conclusion that the same are without merit. Therefore the decree of the lower court is affirmed. Affirmed.
§ 230.12 Movement of non-complying steam locomotives. ( a ) *General limitations on movement.* A steam locomotive with one or more non-complying conditions may be moved only as a lite steam locomotive or a steam locomotive in tow, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section. Cars essential to the movement of the steam locomotive and tender(s), including tool cars and a bunk car, may accompany lite movements.
( b ) *Conditions for movement.* Prior to movement, the steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall determine that it is safe to move the locomotive, determine the maximum speed and other restrictions necessary for safely conducting the movement, and notify in writing the engineer in charge of the defective steam locomotive and, if towed, the engineer in charge of the towing locomotive consist, as well as all other crew members in the cabs, of the presence of the non-complying steam locomotive and the maximum speed and other movement restrictions. In addition, a tag bearing the words “non-complying locomotive” shall be securely attached to each defective steam locomotive and shall contain the following information: ( 1 ) The steam locomotive number;
( 2 ) The name of the inspecting entity;
( 3 ) The inspection location and date;
( 4 ) The nature of the defect;
( 5 ) Movement restrictions, if any;
( 6 ) The destination; and
( 7 ) The signature of the person making the determinations required by this paragraph (b).
( c ) *Yard movements.* A non-complying steam locomotive may be moved lite or dead within a yard at speeds not in excess of 10 miles per hour without meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section if the movement is solely for the purpose of repair. The locomotive owner and/or operator is responsible for ensuring that the movement may be safely made.
( d ) *Non-complying conditions developed en route.* The locomotive owner and/or operator may continue in use a steam locomotive that develops a non-complying condition en route until the next daily inspection or the nearest forward point where the repairs necessary to bring it into compliance can be made, whichever is earlier. Before continuing en route, the steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall determine that it is safe to move the steam locomotive, determine the maximum speed and other restrictions necessary for safely conducting the movement, and notify in writing the engineer in charge of the defective steam locomotive and, if towed, the engineer in charge of the towing steam locomotive consist, as well as all other crew members in the cabs, of the presence of the non-complying steam locomotive and the maximum speed and other movement restrictions.
( e ) *Special notice for repair.* Nothing in this section authorizes the movement of a steam locomotive subject to a Special Notice for Repair unless the movement is made in accordance with the restrictions contained in the Special Notice.
-----Original Message----- 

From: michelle_raskin@condenast.com 

[mailto:michelle_raskin@condenast.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:38 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Michelle Buchsbaum 

933 17th Street # 2 

Santa Monica, CA 90403
From: Anderson-Blodgett, Patricia [mailto:PAnderson-Blodgett@co.humboldt.ca.us] 

Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 12:38 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject:

Concerns Regarding Regulatory Guidance

• What other financial requirements or treatment limitations do plans currently 

impose beyond those listed in the law? How are these limitations or requirements 

imposed on medical or surgical benefits and how are they imposed on mental 

health or substance use disorder benefits? Are these imposed differently to each 

class of benefit, and do plans vary levels of coverage within benefit categories?

• What clarifications can and should be made regarding specific terms or provisions 

to assist with compliance?

• What additional information concerning the criteria for medical-necessity 

determinations is currently offered by plans and, if it is, to whom and how is this 

made available? What industry standards or best practices are in place concerning 

this information and communication of such information?

• Is information currently made available by the plan concerning reasons for denial 

of reimbursement or payment for services for mental health or substance use 

disorder benefits, and how and to whom is this made available? What industry 

standards or best practices are in place concerning this information and 

communication of such information?

• The Departments are seeking more information regarding the scope of out-ofnetwork coverage for mental health and substance use disorder treatment. Do 

plans currently offer out-of-network coverage for mental health and substance use 

disorder benefits and, if so, how is this coverage different from corresponding 

out-of-network medical/surgical benefits?

• Are there aspects of the increased cost exemption that necessitate further 

guidance? Would model notices be helpful to assist with disclosure to federal 

agencies, state agencies, and participants and beneficiaries regarding a plan's or 

issuer's election to implement the cost exemption?

Trish anderson-blodgett, ASW

Mental Health Clinician

Humboldt County
§ 219.621 Use of service agents. ( a ) A railroad may use a service agent (such as a consortium/third party administrator (C/TPA)) to act as its agent to carry out any role in random testing specifically permitted under subpart Q of part 40 of this title, such as maintaining random pools, conducting random selections, and performing random body fluid drug collections and breath alcohol tests.
( b ) A railroad may not use a service agent to notify a regulated employee that he or she has been selected for random testing. A regulated employee who has been selected for random testing must otherwise be notified of the selection by his or her employer. A service agent may also not perform any role that § 40.355 of this title specifically reserves to an employer, which, for purposes of this subpart, is defined as a railroad or a contractor performing railroad-accepted testing.
( c ) A railroad is primarily responsible for compliance with the random alcohol and drug testing of this subpart, but FRA reserves the right to bring an enforcement action for noncompliance against the railroad, its service agents, its contractors, and/or its employees.
( d ) If a railroad conducts random drug and/or alcohol testing through a C/TPA, the number of employees required to be tested may be calculated for each individual railroad belonging to the C/TPA, or may be based on the total number of regulated employees covered by the C/TPA in a larger combined railroad or DOT agency random pool. Selections from combined railroad random pools must meet or exceed the highest minimum annual percentage rate established under this subpart or any DOT agency drug testing rule that applies to any member of that pool.
[81 FR 37937, June 10, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 27652, May 2, 2023]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 21, 1995 (119), Para 119.11 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 1601]
[Page 1446]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.119.11  providing for the consideration of h.r. 1601

  Mr. SOLOMON, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. 
No. 104-258) the resolution (H. Res. 228) providing for the 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 1601) to authorize appropriations to the 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration to develop, assemble, and 
operate the International Space Station.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, September 19, 1995 (117), Para 117.29 Adjournment]
[Page 1404]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.117.29  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. OWENS, at 9 o'clock and 19 minutes p.m., the House 
adjourned.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: noreen.lingham@rcmt.com [mailto:noreen.lingham@rcmt.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 9:05 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

As a school nurse in NYC, I see kids everyday who could benefit from 

having a professional to talk to about what is going on in their lives. 

We have children losing family members including refugees from Haiti's 

horrific earthquake, kids being bullied on a daily basis, single parent 

families where the parent is working two jobs to keep a roof over their 

heads so these kids are raising themselves. These are some of teh very 

kids that end up self medicating with drugs or alcohol to numb their 

pain. I can only do so much in the course of a day, but if these kids 

had the option to speak with someone on a regular basis I can't help 

but believe things might be very different. 

Please support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and Pete 

Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Act of 2008. (RIN 1210-

AB30) 

Sincerely, 

Noreen Lingham RN 

74 Kuhl Avenue 

Hicksville, NY 11801
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2304 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2304

 To amend section 105 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 
     1974 to extend the authority for communities to use community 
development block grant assistance for direct homeownership assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 1995

 Mrs. Mink of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 105 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 
     1974 to extend the authority for communities to use community 
development block grant assistance for direct homeownership assistance.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``CDBG Direct Homeownership Assistance 
Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO EXTEND AUTHORITY FOR DIRECT HOMEOWNERSHIP 
              ASSISTANCE BEFORE SUCH AUTHORITY EXPIRES.

    If this Act is enacted on or before September 30, 1995--
            (1) section 105(a)(25) of the Housing and Community 
        Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5305(a)(25)) is amended--
                    (A) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) by adding at the end the following new flush 
                material:
        ``except that assistance under this title may not be used as 
        provided in this paragraph after September 30, 1996; and''; and
            (2) section 907(b) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National 
        Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 5305 note) is amended by 
        striking paragraph (2).

SEC. 3. AMENDMENTS TO EXTEND AUTHORITY FOR DIRECT HOMEOWNERSHIP 
              ASSISTANCE AFTER SUCH AUTHORITY EXPIRES.

    If this Act is enacted after September 30, 1995, section 105(a) of 
the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5305(a)) 
and section 907(b) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing 
Act (42 U.S.C. 5305 note) are each amended to read as each such section 
involved would have read on the date of the enactment of this Act if 
the provisions of section 2 had been enacted on September 30, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2468

To reform the process under which Federal prisoners bring lawsuits relating

to prison conditions and treatment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 11, 1995

Mr. LOBIONDO (for himself, Mr. ZIMMER, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mrs.

VUCANOVICH, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mr.

HEFLEY, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. LIVINGSTON, Mr. BLUTE, Mr.

BOEHNER, Mr. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. FIELDS of Texas, Mr.

FRELINGHUYSEN, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. HASTERT, Mr.

KLUG, Mr. LAUGHLIN, Mr. MYERS of Indiana, Mr. COX of California,

Mr. MONTGOMERY, Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, Mr. SOUDER, Mr.

WELLER, Mr. BRYANT of Tennessee, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr.

OXLEY, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. HEINEMAN, Mr. PETE GEREN of Texas,

Mr. LATOURETTE, Mrs. CHENOWETH, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. KING, Mr. NEY,

Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. STOCKMAN, Mr. WICKER, Mr. STEARNS,

Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. BEREUTER, and Mr. EHLERS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

A BILL

To reform the process under which Federal prisoners bring

lawsuits relating to prison conditions and treatment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2468 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

2 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the

3 ‘‘Prisoner Lawsuit Efficiency Act of 1995’’.

4 SEC. 2. EXHAUSTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 303 of title 18, United

6 States Code is amended by adding at the end the following

7 new section:

8 ‘‘§ 4048. Exhaustion of administrative remedies

9 ‘‘No action shall be brought in any court, by a pris10 oner in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, con11 cerning any aspect of such prisoner’s incarceration until

12 any administrative remedy procedures available are ex13 hausted. This section applies to all actions regardless of

14 the nominal party defendant. The fact that the adminis15 trative remedies do not include all the possible procedures

16 and forms of recovery that are available in the civil action

17 does not render such administrative remedies inadequate

18 or excuse the failure to exhaust them’’.

19 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

20 at the beginning of chapter 303 of title 18, United States

21 Code, is amended by adding to the end the following new

22 item:

‘‘4018. Exhaustion of administrative process.’’.

Æ
#### In the Matter of the Application of the City of New York, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title to Lands Required for the Opening of Mohegan Avenue. Adelaide V. Black, Appellant.

*Matter of City of New York (Mohegan Ave.),*137 App. Div. 942, affirmed.

(Argued November 14, 1910;

decided November 29, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 8, 1910, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming *510the report of commissioners of estimate and assessment in the above-entitled proceeding.

*George E. Baldwin*for appellant.

*Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly, Joel J. Squier*and *F. W. Gahrmann*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 842

To convey certain property at the Canandaigua Veterans Administration Medical Center in Canandaigua, New York, to the Canandaigua City School

District.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 2001

Mr. REYNOLDS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To convey certain property at the Canandaigua Veterans

Administration Medical Center in Canandaigua, New

York, to the Canandaigua City School District.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY.

4 (a) CONVEYANCE.—The Secretary of Veterans Af5 fairs shall convey, without consideration, to the

6 Canandaigua City School District all right, title, and in7 terest of the United States in and to the property de8 scribed in subsection (b), including any improvements

9 thereon.
2

•HR 842 IH

1 (b) PROPERTY DESCRIBED.—The property to be con2 veyed under this Act consists of two tracts of real property

3 comprising approximately 31 acres at the Canandaigua

4 Veterans Administration Medical Center, Canandaigua,

5 New York. The first tract is approximately 22 acres and

6 has been used by the Canandaigua City School District

7 since January 1, 1994, pursuant to Revocable License

8 number 532–93–061 LI. The second tract is approxi9 mately 9.35 acres and has been used by the school district

10 since September 13, 1999, pursuant to an Enhanced

11 Healthcare Sharing Agreement, contract number V532–

12 2217.

13 (c) CONDITIONS ON CONVEYANCE.—The conveyance

14 under subsection (a) shall be subject to the condition that

15 the real property conveyed under that subsection be used

16 in perpetuity solely for educational and recreational pur17 poses.

Æ
§ 213.1 Scope of part. ( a ) This part prescribes minimum safety requirements for railroad track that is part of the general railroad system of transportation. In general, the requirements prescribed in this part apply to specific track conditions existing in isolation. Therefore, a combination of track conditions, none of which individually amounts to a deviation from the requirements in this part, may require remedial action to provide for safe operations over that track. This part does not restrict a railroad from adopting and enforcing additional or more stringent requirements not inconsistent with this part.
( b ) Subparts A through F apply to track Classes 1 through 5. Subpart G and 213.2, 213.3, 213.15, and 213.240 apply to track over which trains are operated at speeds in excess of those permitted over Class 5 track.
[63 FR 34029, June 22, 1998, as amended at 78 FR 16100, Mar. 13, 2013; 85 FR 63387, Oct. 7, 2020]
§ 260.39 Maintenance standards. ( a ) When the proceeds of a direct loan or an obligation guaranteed by the Administrator under this part are, or were, used to acquire, rehabilitate, improve or construct track, roadbed, and related structures, Borrower shall, as long as any portion of the principal or interest of such obligation remains unpaid, maintain such facilities in at least the highest track class, as defined by FRA Track Safety Standards in part 213 of this chapter, specified in the Application at which the rehabilitated, improved, acquired, or constructed track is to be operated upon completion of the project.
( b ) When the proceeds of a direct loan or an obligation guaranteed by the Administrator under this part are, or were, used for equipment or facilities, the Borrower shall, during the period in which any portion of the principal or interest in such obligation remains unpaid, maintain such equipment or facilities in a manner consistent with sound engineering and maintenance practices and in a condition that will permit the level of use that existed upon completion of the acquisition, rehabilitation, improvement or construction of such equipment or facilities.