alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 164 (Friday, August 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48625-48626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4156]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting and Hearing Agenda.

Date & Time: Thursday, September 6, 2007, 10 a.m.-5 p.m.

Place: U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave, NW., 
Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005. (Metro Stop: Metro Center).

Agenda: The Commission will consider the following topics: 
Commissioners will discuss EAC's regulatory authority under the 
National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) and consider approving a process 
for adopting NVRA regulations; Commissioners will discuss EAC's 
regulatory and administrative responsibilities and discuss other 
administrative matters.
    EAC will provide a public comment period to receive comments 
regarding the commission's regulatory authority under the NVRA. Members 
of the public who wish to speak must contact and register with EAC by 5 
p.m. on Tuesday, September 4, 2007. Speakers may contact EAC via e-mail 
at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bfcbdacccbd6d2d0d1c6ffdadedc91d8d0c9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="186c7d6b6c7175777661587d797b367f776e">[email protected]</span></a>, or via mail addressed to the U.S. Election

[[Page 48626]]

Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave, NW., Suite 1100, Washington, 
DC 20005, or by fax at 202/566-3127. Comments will be strictly limited 
to 4 minutes per person or organization to ensure the fullest 
participation possible. All speakers will be contacted prior to the 
hearing. EAC also encourages members of the public to submit written 
testimony via e-mail, mail or fax. All public comments will be taken in 
writing via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#27534254534e4a48495e6742464409404851"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6115041215080c0e0f18210400024f060e17">[email protected]</span></a>, or via mail addressed to the 
U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave, NW., Suite 
1100, Washington, DC 20005, or by fax at 202/566-3127.
    This meeting and hearing will be open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-
3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-4156 Filed 8-21-07; 2:48 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
From: Koni Bridges [mailto:kbbridges@bellsouth.net] 

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 11:07 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comments Regarding Regulatory Guidance USCG-2007-27022

Comments Regarding Regulatory Guidance USCG-2007-27022 

page 19157, II B specific areas 1 and 4

 

I am a licensed clinical social worker who provides neurofeedback treatment to 

individuals with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Mood Disorders. 

Neurofeedback is an empirically validated and widely recognized effective nonmedication treatment for ADHD, as well as other conditions. There are over 50 studies 

evaluating the effectiveness of neurofeedback in the treatment of ADHD, substance use 

disorders and Autism. A recent review of this literature concluded "Neurofeedback meets 

the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry criteria for Clinical 

Guidelines for treatment of ADHD." This means that neurofeedback meets the same 

criteria as medication for treating ADHD, of which 60% of prescriptions are in fact 

prescribed "off label," and that neurofeedback "should always be considered as an 

intervention for this disorder by the clinician." 

 

This service has been denied by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, United Behavioral Health, 

Blue Cross, Cigna, and Amerigroup. 

 

This is limitation of an effective and validated treatment for a mental health problem. The 

reasons given by the insurance companies for this denial fell into two categories: 1) our 

company does not cover biofeedback for mental health problems or 2) there is not yet 

sufficient evidence for the efficacy of neurofeedback. As such, they are using evidencebased criteria that are far more restrictive for mental health services than the criteria 

which are used for medical/surgical services. There are many routine medical and 

surgical procedures which have far fewer controlled studies about their efficacy than does 

neurofeedback. These medical and surgical procedures are generally not limited because 

of concerns about how many controlled studies have been performed about them. 

 We believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity statute should 

require that employers and plans pay for the same range and scope of services for 

behavioral treatments as they do for medical surgical benefits and that a plan cannot be 

more restrictive in their managed care criteria and reviews for mental health and 

substance abuse disorders when compared to medical surgery. Today plans are being 

more restrictive in how they review evidenced-based mental health and Substance Abuse 

Treatments when compared to medical surgical treatments. This violates both the intent 

and letter of the parity statute and we hope that the regulations will clarify that this can't 

continue. 

 

Thanks for your support with this matter, 

Koni B. Bridges, LCSW, BCIAC 

 

700 1st Avenue 
 Sulphur, LA 70663 

337-528-6969
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2288 Engrossed in House (EH)]

    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2288

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security Act to extend for 2 
 years the deadline by which States are required to have in effect an 
 automated data processing and information retrieval system for use in 
    the administration of State plans for child and spousal support.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTOMATION DEADLINE.

    (a) In General.--Section 454(24) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 654(24)) is amended by striking ``1995'' and inserting ``1997''.
    (b) Technical Amendments Related to the Repeal of Federal 
Funding.--Section 452 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 652) is amended in each of 
subsections (d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(A), (d)(2)(B), and (e), by striking 
``455(a)(1)(B)'' and inserting ``454(16)''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2288

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security Act to extend for 2 
 years the deadline by which States are required to have in effect an 
 automated data processing and information retrieval system for use in 
    the administration of State plans for child and spousal support.
```
EXHIBIT 4.1


                                                               CUSIP 60037Q 10 3
                                 MILLENNIA, INC.


               INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

                                                               SEE REVERSE FOR
                                  COMMON STOCK               CERTAIN DEFINITIONS



                                    SPECIMEN


This
certifies
that







is the owner of


 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF
                                 MILLENNIA, INC.


(hereinafter  called  the  "Corporation"),  transferable  on  the  books  of the
Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney,  upon
surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed.  This certificate and the shares
represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions of
the  Articles of  Incorporation  and the Bylaws of the  Corporation,  as amended
(copies of which are on file at the  office of the  Transfer  Agent),  to all of
which  the  holder  of this  Certificate  by  acceptance  hereof  assents.  This
Certificate  is not valid unless  countersigned  and  registered by the Transfer
Agent and  Registrar.  Witness  the  facsmile  seal of the  Corporation  and the
facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.


DATE:


                            [CORPORATE SEAL OMITTED]



                               Countersigned:
PRESIDENT                                    SECURITIES TRANSFER CORPORATION
                                             P.O. Box 701629
                                             Dallas, TX 75370
                                          By:


SECRETARY                                    ___________________________________
                                             TRANSFER AGENT-AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
§ 23.33 What size standards do recipients use to determine the eligibility of applicants and ACDBEs? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, recipients must treat a firm as a small business eligible to be certified as an ACDBE if the gross receipts of the applicant firm and its affiliates, calculated in accordance with 13 CFR 121.104 averaged over the firm's previous five fiscal years, do not exceed $56.42 million.
( b ) The following types of businesses have size standards that differ from the standard set forth in paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) *Banks and financial institutions.* $1 billion in assets;
( 2 ) *Passenger car rental companies.* $75.23 million average annual gross receipts over the firm's previous five fiscal years;
( 3 ) *Pay telephones.* 1,500 employees; and
( 4 ) *New car dealers.* 350 employees.
( c ) For size purposes, gross receipts (as defined in 13 CFR 121.104(a)), of affiliates should be included in a manner consistent with 13 CFR 121.104(d), except in the context of joint ventures. For gross receipts attributable to joint venture partners, a firm must include in its gross receipts its proportionate share of joint venture receipts, unless the proportionate share already is accounted for in receipts reflecting transactions between the firm and its joint ventures (*e.g.,* subcontracts from a joint venture entity to joint venture partners).
[89 FR 24960, Apr. 9, 2024]
# EUR-Lex - 52004AP0070(01) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52004AP0070(01)

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of San Marino providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC of 3 June 2003 on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments (COM(2004)0643 — C6-0172/2004 — 2004/0241(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 208 E , 25/08/2005 P. 0037 - 0037 *

P6_TA(2004)0070

EC-San Marino Agreement (taxation of savings income) *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of San Marino providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC of 3 June 2003 on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments (COM(2004)0643 — C6-0172/2004 — 2004/0241(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2004)0643) [1],

- having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of San Marino providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments,

- having regard to Article 94, Article 300(2), first subparagraph, and Article 300(4) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0172/2004),

- having regard to Rules 51 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A6-0039/2004),

1. Approves the conclusion of the agreement;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of San Marino.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT
21
 
 
 
 FIRSTENERGY
CORP.
 
 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
OF THE REGISTRANT
 AT DECEMBER 31,
2006
 
 
 Ohio Edison Company
- Incorporated in Ohio
 
 The
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company - Incorporated in Ohio
 
 The
Toledo Edison Company - Incorporated in Ohio
 
 FirstEnergy
Properties Company - Incorporated in Ohio
 
 FirstEnergy Ventures
Corp. - Incorporated in Ohio
 
 FirstEnergy
Facilities Services Group, LLC - Incorporated in Ohio
 
 FirstEnergy
Securities Transfer Company - Incorporated in Ohio
 
 FirstEnergy Service
Company - Incorporated in Ohio
 
 FirstEnergy
Solutions Corp. - Incorporated in Ohio
 
 MARBEL Energy
Corporation - Incorporated in Ohio
 
 FirstEnergy Nuclear
Operating Company - Incorporated in Ohio
 
 FE
Acquisition Corp. - Incorporated in Ohio
 
 American
Transmission Systems, Inc. - Incorporated in Ohio
 
 FELHC, Inc. -
Incorporated in Ohio
 
 Jersey Central Power
& Light Company - Incorporated in New Jersey
 
 Metropolitan Edison
Company - Incorporated in Pennsylvania
 
 Pennsylvania
Electric Company - Incorporated in Pennsylvania
 
 GPU
Capital, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware
 
 GPU
Diversified Holdings, LLC - Incorporated in Delaware
 
 GPU
Nuclear, Inc. - Incorporated in New Jersey
 
 GPU
Power, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware
 
 FirstEnergy Telecom
Services, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware
 
 FirstEnergy
Foundation - Incorporated in Ohio
 
 
 Exhibit Number 21,
List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant at December 31, 2006, is not included in
the printed document.
#### BETTER LIVING, INC., a Corporation, Carl Mickelson and Fred E. Block, Individually and as Officers of said Corporation, and Also as Partners Trading as Aluminum Storm Window Company, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 12544.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Sept. 18, 1958.

Decided Oct. 8, 1958.

Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

Joseph Lurie, Philadelphia, Pa. (Isa-dore A. Schrager, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioners.

James E. Corkey, Washington, D. C. (Earl W. Kintner, Gen. Counsel, James E. Corkey, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Alvin L. Berman, Atty., Washington, D. C., on the brief), for Federal Trade Commission.

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition for review of an order of the Federal Trade Commission directing the petitioner to cease and desist from certain business practices dealing chiefly with its advertisements. There is no law question in the case. The fact conclusions reached by the Commission have adequate support in the evidence presented.

The order of the Federal Trade Com» mission will be affirmed.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 29, 1995 (123), Para 123.34 Recess--6:21 P.M.]
[Page 1492]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.123.34  recess--6:21 p.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, pursuant to clause 12 of rule I, 
declared the House in recess at 6 o'clock and 21 minutes p.m., subject 
to the call of the Chair.
```
#### § 223.8 Additional requirements for passenger equipment.

In addition to the requirements contained in this part, requirements for emergency window exits and window safety glazing on passenger equipment, as defined in § 238.5 of this chapter, are also found in part 238 of this chapter.

[64 FR 25659, May 12, 1999]
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

September 10, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00342

- CV

VILLA DIJON CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. , Ap pellant

v.

Mary WINTERS

, Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- CI

- 03926 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

In cause number 2015CI00148, t he trial court signed a default judgment against Appellants on March 9, 2015. In the same document, t he trial court severed the claims against Appellants and assigned them to cause number 2015CI03926.
Absent a timely filed motion that would extend the deadline to file a notice of appeal, see,
e.g. , T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1(a), A ppellant s ’ notice of appeal in cause number 2015CI03926 was due

on April 8, 2015

, s ee id. R

. 26.1

. A motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was due not later than April 23 , 201 5

. See id. R. 26.3. A ppellant s ’ notice of appeal was filed on June 3, 2015

. See generally Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) ( “ [A] motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant acting in good faith files a [ notice of appeal ] beyond the time allowed by R ule [ 26.1 ], but within the fifteen

- day period in which the appellant would be entitled to move to exten d the filing deadline under Rule [26.3]. ” (emphasis added)).

W e ORDER Appellant s to SHOW CAUSE in writing within FIF T E EN DAYS of the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 42.3(a); Verburgt , 959 S.W.2d at 617 (“[O] nce the period for granting a motion for
extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate

court ’ s jurisdiction .”). If Appellant s fail to respond within the time provided, this appe al will be
dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of September, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
-----Original Message----- 

From: erhartnett@gmail.com [mailto:erhartnett@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:47 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Erin Hartnett 

758 E 72nd Ter 

Kansas City, MO 64131
-----Original Message----- 

From: Patterss@loswego.k12.or.us [mailto:Patterss@loswego.k12.or.us] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:14 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sue Patterson 

2212 SW Caldew St 

Portland, OR 97219
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-1287

_____________________________

MATTHEW EARL SMITH,

Appellant,

v.

ERIN BROOKE SMITH PICOU,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Darlene Dickey, Judge.

January 26, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized 

motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________

Ross A. Keene of Ross Keene Law, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant.

Todd M. Ladouceur and Chris K. Ritchie of Galloway, Johnson, 

Tompkins, Burr & Smith, P.L.C., Pensacola, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Michael E. Ricketson, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PAB Bankshares, Inc;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
   a.) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b.) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c.) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a.) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b.) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: August 14, 2003

By:

**/s/ Michael E. Ricketson**Michael E. Ricketson
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer of the registrant)