alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Ann DeLong [mailto:anndelo@gmail.com] 

Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 7:24 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN1210-AB32

Hi, please change the definition of "fiduciary" to include the regulation of any person who gives 

investment advice to an employee benefit plan or a plan's participants.

The DOL has the necessary expertise and this is vital to protect millions of Americans who are 

trying to save for retirement yet are thwarted by poorly understood "fine print" that allows banks 

to charge fees. This dwindles the amount of money put in retirement accounts by BILLIONS 

nationwide as interest is calculated on the amount taken by banks. It stops just short of robbery 

and it should be regulated.

Look, the banks do not need this money, they are bilking Americans out of their hard earned 

money. It's sickening to see Republicans side with the banks on this. Please act on this now!

Thanks, Ann DeLong
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-915.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

ATOMIC ENERGY 

Cooperation 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ROMANIA 

Signed at Bucharest September 15, 2008 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
ROMANIA 

Atomic Energy: Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Bucharest September 15, 2008; 

 Entered into force September 15, 2008.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, July 28, 1995 (104), Para 104.27 Adjournment]
[Pages 1220-1221]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.104.27  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. EHRLICH, pursuant to the special order heretofore

[[Page 1221]]

agreed to, at 5 o'clock and 20 minutes p.m., the House adjourned until 
10:30 a.m. on Monday, August 31, 1995.
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 21, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135640 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135640 COA: 271892 Oakland CC: 2005-205374-FC JARRON DONTI GEORGE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 20, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERS E the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals di ssenting opinion, and we REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for a new trial.

s0514 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 21, 2008

Clerk
-----Original Message----- 

From: lindstrom.lynn@orange.fr [mailto:lindstrom.lynn@orange.fr] 

Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 3:17 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 01, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lynn Lindstrom 

6652 Graystone Lane 

San Jose, CA 95120
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsScattering from coated structures and antenna pattern control using impedance surfaces, part A/BThe scattering from coated, conducting structures, specifically the coated dihedral corner reflector configuration and the coated strip/plate configuration is examined. The formulation uses impedance-wedge Uniform Theory of Diffraction scattering coefficients to calculate the diffracted fields. A finite-thickness coating is approximated using the impedance boundary condition to arrive at an equivalent impedance for the coating. The formulation of the impedance wedge coefficients is outlined. Far-field, perfectly conducting approximations are discussed. Problems with the present dihedral corner reflector model for certain angles of incidence and observation are discussed along with a potentially rectifying modification. Also, the capacity to measure the electromagnetic properties of lossy materials was developed. The effects of using multiple material coatings on the radiation pattern of the horn antenna were studied. Numerous computations were devoted toward the inverse problem of synthesizing desired radiation patterns using the impedance surfaces. Stabilizing the equivalent sheet impedance using the linear control condition was attempted, and it was found to be a very difficult task.Document ID19900016917Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBalanis, Constantine A.*(Arizona State Univ. Tempe, AZ, United States)*Polka, Lesley A.*(Arizona State Univ. Tempe, AZ, United States)*Liu, Kefeng*(Arizona State Univ. Tempe, AZ, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186871NASA-CR-186871Accession Number90N26233Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-562Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016917.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 227.115 Hearing protectors. ( a ) *General requirements for hearing protectors.* ( 1 ) The railroad shall provide hearing protectors to employees at no cost to the employee.
( 2 ) The railroad shall replace hearing protectors as necessary.
( 3 ) When offering hearing protectors, a railroad shall consider an employee's ability to understand and respond to voice radio communications and audible warnings.
( 4 ) The railroad shall give employees the opportunity to select their hearing protectors from a variety of suitable hearing protectors. The selection shall include devices with a range of attenuation levels.
( 5 ) The railroad shall provide training in the use and care of all hearing protectors provided to employees.
( 6 ) The railroad shall ensure proper initial fitting and supervise the correct use of all hearing protectors.
( b ) *Availability of hearing protectors.* A railroad shall make hearing protectors available to all employees exposed to sound levels that meet or exceed the action level.
( c ) *Required use at action level.* A railroad shall require the use of hearing protectors when an employee is exposed to sound levels that meet or exceed the action level, and the employee has: ( 1 ) Not yet had a baseline audiogram established pursuant to § 227.109; or
( 2 ) Experienced a standard threshold shift and is required to use hearing protectors under § 227.109(h).
( d ) *Required use for TWA of 90 dB(A).* The railroad shall require the use of hearing protectors when an employee is exposed to sound levels equivalent to an 8-hour TWA of 90 dB(A) or greater. The hearing protectors should be used to reduce sound levels to within those levels required by appendix A of this part.
-----Original Message----- 

From: gavinsparby@gmail.com [mailto:gavinsparby@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 8:02 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Gavin Sparby 

2914 1st Ave. 

Hibbing, MN 55746
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KENDALL WILLIAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 162 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, October 30, 1995 (136), Para 136.14 U.S. Armed Forces in Bosnia]
[Page 1800]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.136.14  u.s. armed forces in bosnia

  Mr. GILMAN moved to suspend the rules and agree to the following 
resolution (H. Res. 247):

       Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of 
     Representatives that--
       (1) in the negotiation of any peace agreement between the 
     parties to the conflict in the Republic of Bosnia and 
     Herzegovina, there should not be a presumption, and it should 
     not be considered to be a prerequisite to the successful 
     conclusion of such a negotiation, that enforcement of such an 
     agreement will involve deployment of United States Armed 
     Forces on the ground in the territory of the Republic of 
     Bosnia and Herzegovina; and
       (2) no United States Armed forces should be deployed on the 
     ground in the territory of the Republic of Bosnia and 
     Herzagovina to enforce a peace agreement until the Congress 
     has approved such a deployment.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, recognized Mr. GILMAN and Mr. 
HAMILTON, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and agree to said resolution?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  Mr. GILMAN demanded that the vote be taken by the yeas and nays, which 
demand was supported by one-fifth of the Members present, so the yeas 
and nays were ordered.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced that further proceedings on the motion were postponed.
```
#### § 236.739 Device, acknowledging.

A manually operated electric switch or pneumatic valve by means of which, on a locomotive equipped with an automatic train stop or train control device, an automatic brake application can be forestalled, or by means of which, on a locomotive equipped with an automatic cab signal device, the sounding of the cab indicator can be silenced.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,983,471
<SECURITIES>                                 2,867,715
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,785,560
<ALLOWANCES>                                   123,022
<INVENTORY>                                  6,354,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,993,367
<PP&E>                                      27,914,841
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,960,748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,947,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,226,686
<BONDS>                                      4,950,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,169,296
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,341,806
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,947,460
<SALES>                                     44,213,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            44,543,404
<CGS>                                       30,797,023
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,797,023
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,573,074
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                52,208
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             546,666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,044,510
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,183,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,861,510
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,861,510
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.30


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Tristan Harrison v. One Westfield Lake

Appellate case number: 01-17-00150-CV

Trial court case number: 1088470

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County

On February 27, 2017, appellant, Tristan Harrison, proceeding pro se, filed a 

notice of appeal from the judgment, signed by the county court on February 21, 2017, in 

this eviction case. On March 22, 2017, the Clerk of this Court sent a notice to appellant 

stating that, absent a record showing he was indigent, unless he paid the filing fee by 

April 21, 2017, this appeal was subject to dismissal.

On April 18, 2017, the county clerk filed an original clerk’s record in this Court 

containing, among other documents, appellant’s “Statement of Inability to Afford 

Payment of Court Costs or an Appeal Bond in Justice Court” (“Statement”), filed on 

January 19, 2017, and the Bill of Costs notes that the clerk’s record fee was waived due 

to this Statement. There was no contest or a trial court’s order regarding the Statement.

Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1 provides that a party who files such a Statement

in the trial court “is not required to pay costs in the appellate court unless the trial court

overruled the party’s claim of indigence in an order that complies with Texas Rule of 

Civil Procedure 145.” TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(b)(1). Because appellant’s claim of 

indigence was uncontested and not overruled by the trial court, appellant is not required 

to pay costs in this appeal. See id.

Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to deem the appellant indigent 

and allowed to proceed without advance payment for purposes of the filing and 

reporter’s record fees. Finally, we ORDER the county clerk to mail the clerk’s record to 

the pro se appellant within 20 days of the date of this Order, at no cost to appellant, and 

shall further certify to this Court the delivery date within 30 days of this Order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

 for the Court

Date: April 25, 2017
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, July 21, 1995 (99), Para 99.36 Memorials]
[Page 1178]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.99.36  memorials

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, memorials were presented and referred as 
follows:

       140. By the SPEAKER: Memorial of the Senate of the State of 
     Nevada, relative to urging the Congress of the United States 
     to adopt proposals that are equitable to all States for 
     regulating the air quality within the area surrounding the 
     Grand Canyon; to the Committee on Commerce.
       141. Also, memorial of the Senate of the State of Nevada, 
     relative to the visitor facilities program at the Hoover Dam; 
     to the Committee on Resources.
       142. Also, memorial of the Senate of the State of Nevada, 
     relative to urging the Congress of the United States to 
     approve the designation of the National Highway System; to 
     the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended September 30,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                  1,139
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,139
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,139
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      36
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                516
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,139
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          475
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           312
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       312
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              312
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           10.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                           10.58
        

</TABLE>
#### § 230.44 Time of testing.

Steam gauges shall be tested prior to being installed or being reapplied, during the 92 service day inspection, and whenever any irregularity is reported.
**BF** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0176 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. NATALIE AMANDA RICH,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30
- day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including Septe mber 17 , 2021 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 17 2021

08/17/2021
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTOF 1934**

I, Karen L.Johannes, certify that:

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Paulson Capital Corp.;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)):

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  [Reserved.]

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: August 11,2006

/s/Karen L. JohannesKaren L. JohannesChief Financial OfficerPaulson Capital Corp.

----