alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 246.3 Application and responsibility for compliance. ( a ) This part applies to all railroads, except: ( 1 ) Railroads that do not have a signal system as defined in § 246.7;
( 2 ) Railroads that operate only on track inside an installation that is not part of the general railroad system of transportation (*i.e.,* plant railroads, as defined in § 246.7);
( 3 ) Tourist, scenic, historic, or excursion operations that are not part of the general railroad system of transportation as defined in § 246.7; or
( 4 ) Rapid transit operations in an urban area that are not connected to the general railroad system of transportation.
( b ) Although the duties imposed by this part are generally stated in terms of the duty of a railroad, each person, as defined in § 246.7, who performs any function required by this part must perform that function in accordance with this part.
AFS-13-026-E 

December 10, 2012 

 Exemption No. 8843C 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-26738 

Mr. David L. Jones 

Corporate Aviation Education Director 

Aviation Institute of Maintenance 

4455 South Boulevard 

Virginia Beach, VA 23452 

Dear Mr. Jones: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8843, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated August 22, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Technical Educational Services, Inc., d.b.a. Aviation Institute of Maintenance 

(Aviation Institute) (operating under Air Agency Certificate V18T077K) for an extension of 

Exemption No. 8843, as amended. That exemption from § 65.75(a) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations allows Aviation Institute to administer the aviation mechanic general 

written test to students immediately following their successful completion of the general 

curriculum but before they meet the experience requirements of § 65.77. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register. The requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, 

and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Aviation Institute. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8843, as 
 2

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, 

under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8843, as amended, to 

February 28, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8843 remain the same. This letter must be 

attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8843. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Michael J. Zenkovich 

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
#### FRANCES D. WOODRUFF, Respondent, *v.*ELIZABETH YOUNG, as Executrix, etc., of JAMES YOUNG, Deceased, Appellant.

*Surrogate —ju/risdietion over executors*— *he cannot compel them to account for property held as the agents for a legatee.*

Upon the hearing of an applicaton to compel executors to account, in a Surrogate’s Court, in respect to certain specific securities, it appeared that, prior thereto, a settlement had been made between the legatee seeking to compel the accounting, and the executors, by which the said securities were transferred to the the said legatee as a part of her share in the estate.

*Held,*that, after such settlement, the securities were held by the executors as agents and trustees for the legatee, and not as executors, and that the surrogate had no power to compel them to account for their actions in regard to them.

*Bonfanti*v. *Beguerre*(3 Bradf., 431) distinguished.

Appeal from so much of an order made by the surrogate of the ' county of Livingston as requires the defendant, to account in respect to certain securities, known as the Gibbs and Lake mortgages.

*D. W.*Noyes, attorney for the appellant.

*8. Hubbard,*of counsel.

*James Wood,*for the respondent.

Smith, P. J.:

The order of the surrogate evidently assumes the validity and binding force of the alleged settlement made between the parties to this appeal in 1868, wherein the Gibbs and Lake mortgages were transferred by the executrix to Mrs. Woodruff towards her share of the estate, as then ascertained and settled, and the remainder was paid to her in money. Upon no other assumption has Mrs. Wood-ruff any interest in those specific securities, her right, independently *421of that settlement, being simply to share with the other legatees in the entire estate, of which those securities were a part. But in respect to the mortgages named, the defendant, if liable at all, is liable not as executrix, but as the agent and trustee of the plaintiff. The surrogate has not jurisdiction to call the defendant to account as such agent and trustee. The remark made in the case of *Bonfanti*v. *Deguerre*(3 Bradf., 131), cited by the respondent’s counsel, that the court will not regard the discharge of an executor out of court, is inapplicable to the present case, inasmuch as the settlement between the executor and the legatee is here assumed to be valid, and upon that ground alone is the defendant held liable to account for the particular securities referred to. The liability, if any exists in respect to those securities or their proceeds, can only be enforced in a court of general jurisdiction.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars ■costs and disbursements.

Hardin and Barrer, JJ., concurred

So ordered.
#### § 271.209 Consultation on amendments.

A railroad's RRP plan shall include a description of the process the railroad will use to consult with its directly affected employees on any subsequent substantive amendments to the railroad's RRP plan. The requirements of this section do not apply to non-substantive amendments (*e.g.,* amendments that update names and addresses of railroad personnel).
-----Original Message----- 

From: storywoman@juno.com [mailto:storywoman@juno.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:21 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Susan Billings 

7621 Leviston Ave. 

El Cerrito, CA 94530
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, September 25, 1995 (120), Para 120.9 Private Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1451]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.120.9  private bills and resolutions

  Under clause 1 of rule XXII,

       Mr. LIVINGSTON introduced a bill (H.R. 2397) for the relief 
     of Jacqueline Darby-Maltbie; which was referred to the 
     Committee on the Judiciary.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 13, 1995 (114), Para 114.26 Adjournment]
[Page 1341]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.114.26  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. FOX, pursuant to the special order heretofore agreed 
to, at 10 o'clock and 32 minutes p.m., the House adjourned until 1 
o'clock p.m. on Thursday, September 14, 1995.
```
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/20/15 11:22 PM

Received: July 20, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k32-wb8j

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2540

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Cassandra Bishop

General Comment

The government is already controlling more than they should. I DO NOT want my retirement to 

be controlled by the government. This is unacceptable!
-----Original Message----- 

From: meili@humboldt1.com [mailto:meili@humboldt1.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:44 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

MeiLi McCann-Sayles 

1696 Ocean Dr. 

McKinleyville, CA 95519
-----Original Message----- 

From: greenknight@cox.net [mailto:greenknight@cox.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 6:58 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Elizabeth Osborne 

200 N. El Camino Real #83 

Oceanside, CA 92058
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 6/24/15 9:46 PM

Received: June 24, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jls-u3br

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0329

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: JJ Jelincic

Address: 

266 Jane Ct

Hayward, CA, 94544

Email: jjjelincic@yahoo.com

General Comment

This rule should be a no brainer.

Why should people who are offering advise be able to put their own interests above the interest 

of the person they are advising?

To argue that if I can't put my own interests first then I will offer less advise begs the question. 

They why would I want your advise and what value should I assign to it?

Adopt the rule.

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b526b2&format=xml&show... 6/24/2015
-----Original Message----- 

From: evaneis@yahoo.com [mailto:evaneis@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:06 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

evan eisentager 

3003 valmont road #220 

boulder, CO 80301
§ 211.51 Tests. ( a ) Pursuant to the Department of Transportation Act (80 Stat. 931, 49 U.S.C. 1651 *et seq.*), the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 971, 45 U.S.C. 421, 431-441), or both, the Administrator may temporarily suspend compliance with a substantive rule of the Federal Railroad Administration, if: ( 1 ) The suspension is necessary to the conduct of a Federal Railroad Administration approved test program designed to evaluate the effectiveness of new technology or operational approaches or instituted in furtherance of a present or proposed rulemaking proceeding;
( 2 ) The suspension is limited in scope and application to such relief as may be necessary to facilitate the conduct of the test program; and
( 3 ) The suspension is conditioned on the observance of standards sufficient to assure safety.
( b ) When required by statute, a notice is published in the Federal Register, an opportunity is provided for public comment, and a hearing is held in accordance with § 211.25, before the FRA approved test program is implemented.
( c ) When the Administrator approves suspension of compliance with any rule in connection with a test program, a description of the test program containing an explanatory statement responsive to paragraph (a) of this section is published in the Federal Register.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

March 1, 2005 

 

The Premcor Refining Group Inc. 

1700 East Putnam Avenue, Suite 400

Old Greenwich, CT 06870 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-111240 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 1, 2005, relating to the financial statementsand financial statement schedules of The Premcor Refining Group Inc. and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Premcor Refining Group Inc. forthe year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Stamford, Connecticut
-----Original Message----- 

From: kerenchaya@comcast.net [mailto:kerenchaya@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:03 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Keren Carter 

12 Stansbury Court 

Chico, CA 95928
-----Original Message----- 

From: bleach13104@yahoo.com [mailto:bleach13104@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 10:12 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 01, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Rebecca DuBois 

P.O. Box 53 

Lunenburg, VT 05906
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Regulatory Commission

# NAME OF AGENCY:

Postal Regulatory Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

Convening on Tuesday, January 9, 2007, at 9:30 a.m., and continuing daily thereafter as needed, at 9:30 a.m. or after, until completed.

# PLACE:

Commission conference room, 901 New York Avenue, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20268-0001.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Recommendations in Docket No. R2006-1.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, Postal Regulatory Commission, 202-789-6820.

Dated: January 5, 2007.

Steven W. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 07-40  Filed 1-5-07; 12:35 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-FW-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [OR-100 5882 RD 50; HAG 07-0155]

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announces the following advisory committee meeting:

*Name:*                     Roseburg District Resource Advisory Committee.                

*Time and Date:*                     9 a.m. August 20, 2007; 9 a.m. September 17, 2007; 9 a.m. September 24, 2007.                

*Place:*                     Roseburg District Office, 777 NW., Garden Valley Blvd., Roseburg, Oregon 97470.                

*Status:*                     Open to the public; a public comment period will be provided.                

*Matters to be Considered:*                     The Resource Advisory Committee will consider proposed projects for Title II funding that focus on maintaining or restoring water quality, land health, forest ecosystems, and infrastructure.                

*Contact Person for More Information:*                     Program information, meeting records and a roster of Committee members may be obtained from Jake Winn, Restoration Coordinator, 777 NW., Garden Valley Blvd., Roseburg, Oregon 97470; (541) 464-3275.                

Should you require reasonable accommodation, please contact the BLM Roseburg District at (440) 440-4940 as soon as possible.

Jay Carlson,

District Manager.

[FR Doc. 07-3905 Filed 8-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
-----Original Message----- 

From: bldespang111278@yahoo.com [mailto:bldespang111278@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:32 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Brandy Despang 

77-A Emerson Drive 

Palm Coast, FL 32164
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000706270
<NAME> AMERICA WEST AIRLINES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         136,323
<SECURITIES>                                    29,385
<RECEIVABLES>                                   98,075
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,056
<INVENTORY>                                     21,735
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               339,379
<PP&E>                                         885,450
<DEPRECIATION>                                 189,265
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,602,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          527,862
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     623,382
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,602,082
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               462,187
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  428,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   750
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,081
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,918
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,974
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,944
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### George H. Amos, Respondent, *v.*International Railway Company, Appellant.

*Amos*v. *International Railway Co.,*128 App. Div. 908, affirmed.

(Argued December 6, 1910;

decided January 3, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 9, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the defendant’s negligence.

*Dana L. Spring*and *Charles B. Sears*for appellant.

*Charles W. Strong*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.