alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 21

CORPORATE ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
FOREMOST CORPORATION OF AMERICA
DECEMBER 31, 1998

Foremost Corporation of America (Michigan)
  FEIN: 38-1863522, NAIC Grp: 238
  -------------------------------------------
        Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-1470533, NAIC: 11185
          -------------------------------------------------------------
              American Federation Insurance Company (Florida) 100%
                FEIN: 59-2326047, NAIC: 43699
              Foremost Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Michigan) 100%
                FEIN: 35-1604635, NAIC: 11800
              Foremost Signature Insurance Company (Michigan) 100%
                FEIN: 38-2430150, NAIC: 41513
              Federated Insurance Services of California (California) 100%
        Foremost Financial Services Corporation (Delaware) 100%
          FEIN: 73-0462770
        Foremost Home Services Corporation (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-2260224
        Foremost Home Brokers, Inc. (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-2197432
        Foremost Express Insurance Agency, Inc. (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-2505922
        Foremost Affinity Services, Inc. (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 382234183
        Western Star Underwriters, Inc. (Texas) 100%
          FEIN: 74-1593853
        Foremost Real Estate Company (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-2429614
        Foremost Affiliated Insurance Services, Inc. (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-2336672
          ----------------------------------------------------------
              Pacific Way Insurance Agency, Inc. (Washington) 100%
                FEIN: 38-2987359
              Knight Agency, Inc. (Kentucky) 100%
                FEIN: 61-1281764
              Sunrise Insurance Agency, Inc. (Nevada) 100%
                FEIN: 88-0266963
              Sunrise Insurance Agency of Arizona, Inc. (Arizona) 100%
                FEIN: 31-1360491
              Corvette General Agency, Inc. (Georgia) 100%
                FEIN: 31-1368858
              Frontier Insurance Agency, Inc. (Oregon) 100%
                FEIN: 38-2987361


<PAGE>
Foremost Lloyds of Texas (Texas)
  FEIN: 75-1779175, NAIC: 41688
Foremost County Mutual Insurance Company (Texas)
  FEIN: 38-1721730, NAIC: 29254
  ----------------------------------------------
      Sunrise Insurance Agency of Texas, Inc. (Texas) 100%
        FEIN: 38-2987749
§ 27.123 Conduct of investigations. ( a ) *Periodic compliance reviews.* The responsible Departmental official or his/her designee, from time to time, reviews the practices of recipients to determine whether they are complying with this part.
( b ) *Complaints.* Any person who believes himself/herself or any specific class of individuals to be harmed by failure to comply with this part may, personally or through a representative, file a written complaint with the responsible Departmental official. A Complaint must be filed not later than 180 days from the date of the alleged discrimination, unless the time for filing is extended by the responsible Departmental official or his/her designee.
( c ) *Investigations.* The responsible Departmental official or his/her designee makes a prompt investigation whenever a compliance review, report, complaint, or any other information indicates a possible failure to comply with this part. The investigation includes, where appropriate, a review of the pertinent practices and policies of the recipient, and the circumstances under which the possible noncompliance with this part occurred.
( d ) *Resolution of matters.* ( 1 ) If, after an investigation pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section, the responsible Departmental official finds reasonable cause to believe that there is a failure to comply with this part, the responsible Departmental official will inform the recipient. The matter is resolved by informal means whenever possible. If the responsible Departmental official determines that the matter cannot be resolved by informal means, action is taken as provided in § 27.125.
( 2 ) If an investigation does not warrant action pursuant to paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the responsible Departmental official or his/her designee so informs the recipient and the complainant, if any, in writing.
( e ) *Intimidating and retaliatory acts prohibited.* No employee or contractor of a recipient shall intimidate, threaten, coerce, or discriminate against any individual for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by section 504 of the Act or this part, or because the individual has made a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, hearing, or proceeding, under this part. The identity of complainants is kept confidential at their election during the conduct of any investigation, hearing or proceeding under this part. However, when such confidentiality is likely to hinder the investigation, the complainant will be advised for the purpose of waiving the privilege.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 4/29/15 10:51 AM

Received: April 28, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8ijv-svgx

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0249

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Camilla Merrick

Address: 

255 Woodcliff Drive

Fairport, 14450

Email: cmerrick@wsfg.com

Phone: 585-267-8000

General Comment

Regarding Regulation Identifier Number: RIN 1210-AB32

This comment is regarding the request to extend the comment period to 120 days. It is 

imperative that we as financial

services supervisors be given ample time to analyze the impact the new rule would have to our 

clients, advisors, and business

in general. We need time to vet this situation in order to provide meaningful, constructive 

feedback to you as you are requesting. 

We are asking for a sufficient amount of time and moving from 75 to 120 days would not seem 

to be an excessive 

request to ensure that the objectives are accomplished.

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481ac07a2&format=xml&show... 4/29/2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,215,688
<SECURITIES>                                 1,102,222
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,137,537
<ALLOWANCES>                                   108,652
<INVENTORY>                                  6,898,603
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,330,371
<PP&E>                                      27,668,306
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,680,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,326,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,289,792
<BONDS>                                      7,200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,171,496
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,605,264
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,326,552
<SALES>                                     22,096,824
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,510,953
<CGS>                                       14,938,997
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,696,437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,757,440
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                30,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,174,001
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,226,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,948,001
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,948,001
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.33
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Somanetics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), we, Bruce J. Barrett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and William M. Iacona, Vice President, Finance, Controller, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      1.    the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

Dated: April 11, 2005               /s/ Bruce J. Barrett
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Bruce J. Barrett, President and Chief
                                    Executive Officer

Dated: April 11, 2005               /s/ William M. Iacona
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    William M. Iacona, Vice President, Finance,
                                    Controller, Treasurer and Chief Financial
                                    Officer
From: tyjar131313@yahoo.com [mailto:tyjar131313@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 4:39 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie Royce 

2720 Glendora Ave Apt 3 

Cincinnati, OH 45219
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6601
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHNNY CASTELLO JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-30, CA-93-400-3-P) Submitted: August 20, 1996 Decided: October 15, 1996 Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny Castello Johnson, Appe llant Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. United States , Nos. CR-92-30, CA-93-400-3-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 22, 1995). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*Michael F. Collins, *Respondent, v.*John D. Spicer, *as Comptroller, etc., Appellant.*

— Order modified in accordance with opinion of Potter, J., and to be settled by him, without costs to either party. Opinion by

Potter, J.
#### § 236.773 Movements, conflicting.

Movements over conflicting routes.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      875
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                          3
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,102
<PP&E>                                             372
<DEPRECIATION>                                      87
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,902
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           535
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,157)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,280
<SALES>                                             98
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   870
<CGS>                                               74
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       86
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (471)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (471)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (471)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.04)


</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 7, 1995 (111), Para 111.35 Leave of Absence]
[Page 1317]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.111.35  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--
  To Ms. McKINNEY, for September 6 and 7;
  To Mr. BISHOP, for September 6 and 7; and
  To Mr. Cox, for today until 5 p.m.
  And then,
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, October 18, 1995 (130), Para 130.19 Appointment of Conferees--H.R. 2126]
[Page 1548]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.130.19  appointment of conferees--h.r. 2126

  Thereupon, the SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaHOOD, by unanimous consent, 
announced the appointment of Messrs. Young of Florida, McDade, 
Livingston, Lewis of California, Skeen, Hobson, Bonilla, Nethercutt, 
Istook, Murtha, Dicks, Wilson, Hefner, Sabo, and Obey, as managers on 
the part of the House at said conference.
  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate thereof.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2288 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2288

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 28 (legislative day, September 25), 1995

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security Act to extend for 2 
 years the deadline by which States are required to have in effect an 
 automated data processing and information retrieval system for use in 
    the administration of State plans for child and spousal support.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTOMATION DEADLINE.

    (a) In General.--Section 454(24) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 654(24)) is amended by striking ``1995'' and inserting ``1997''.
    (b) Technical Amendments Related to the Repeal of Federal 
Funding.--Section 452 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 652) is amended in each of 
subsections (d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(A), (d)(2)(B), and (e), by striking 
``455(a)(1)(B)'' and inserting ``454(16)''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 17855 Civilian noninstitutional population Number in thousands 75 years and over 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value** LNU00024942Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Population Lev el - 75 yrs. & over

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:10:18 PM)
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATIONS








I, Steven R. Staub, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of FirstEnergy Ohio PIRB Special Purpose Trust 2013 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by Ohio Edison Company, as servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, Ohio Edison Company, as servicer, has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.








In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank, National Association, as Certificate Trustee and Indenture Trustee.








Date: March 29, 2024





/s/ Steven R. StaubSteven R. StaubVice President and Treasurer (Senior Officer in Charge of Servicing Function) of Ohio Edison Company, as Servicer under the Phase-In-Recovery Property Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2013, between the Servicer and OE Funding LLC, as the Bond Issuer
Leading Quality Addiction Treatment in the Northern Rockies 

April 28, 2010 

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: CMS-4140-IFC, Mail Stop C4-26-05 

7500 Security Boulevard 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final rules under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health 

Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Thank you for providing this opportunity to comment upon the above rules. We are 

deeply appreciative of the work these rules represent on the part of many. 

We are highly supportive of the need for the non quantitative limitation language and 

wish to see this retained in any future modifications. 

What we are finding is that by limiting the language to either outpatient or inpatient in 

describing the treatment settings and levels of care, insurance companies are now 

excluding "residential" care from policies. They use the term residential to mean any 24 

hour setting outside of an acute care hospital. In fact, most addiction treatment in our 

country is delivered in free-standing inpatient facilities or outside of acute care 

hospitals, because of the nature of the services required and because it is more costeffective to deliver services in these settings. This includes the provision of medical 

services in these settings. We are, therefore, requesting that you include the term 

residential in your delineation of treatment settings. 

We will appreciate your favorable response to this request. 

Yours truly, -.. P H' 

Mona L. ~imner, MHA, ACATA 

Chief Operations Officer 

1231 N. 29th St. P.O. Box 30374 Billings, MT 59107 (406) 248-31 75 1800) 227-3953 www.rimrock.org 

Accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities
#### William H. Parsons and others, *Respondents, v.*Daniel J. Sprague and others, *Appellants.*

— Judgment affirmed.