alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 24.204 Availability of comparable replacement dwelling before displacement. ( a ) *General.* No person to be permanently displaced shall be required to move from his or her dwelling unless at least one comparable replacement dwelling (defined at § 24.2(a)) has been made available to the person. Information on comparable replacement dwellings that were used in the determination process must be provided to permanently displaced persons. When possible, three or more comparable replacement dwellings shall be made available. A comparable replacement dwelling will be considered to have been made available to a person, if: ( 1 ) The person is informed in writing of its location;
( 2 ) The person has sufficient time to negotiate and enter into a purchase or lease agreement for the property; and
( 3 ) Subject to reasonable safeguards, the person is assured of receiving the relocation assistance and acquisition payment to which the person is entitled in sufficient time to complete the purchase or lease of the property.
( b ) *Circumstances permitting waiver.* The Federal agency funding the project may grant a waiver of the requirement in paragraph (a) of this section in any case where it is demonstrated that a person must move because of: ( 1 ) A major disaster as defined in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 5122);
( 2 ) A presidentially declared national emergency; or
( 3 ) Another emergency which requires immediate vacation of the real property, such as when continued occupancy of the displacement dwelling constitutes a substantial danger to the health or safety of the occupants or the public.
( c ) *Basic conditions of emergency move.* Whenever a person to be displaced is required to move from the displacement dwelling for a temporary period because of an emergency as described in paragraph (b) of this section, the agency shall: ( 1 ) Take whatever steps are necessary to assure that the person who is required to move from their dwelling is relocated to a DSS dwelling;
( 2 ) Pay the actual reasonable out-of-pocket moving expenses and any reasonable increase in rent and utility costs incurred in connection with the emergency move; and
( 3 ) Make available to the displaced person as soon as feasible, at least one comparable replacement dwelling. (For purposes of filing a claim and meeting the eligibility requirements for a relocation payment; the date of displacement is the date the person moves from their dwelling due to the emergency.)
#### § 236.733 Current, foreign.

A term applied to stray electric currents which may affect a signaling system, but which are not a part of the system.
§ 178.960 Preparation of Large Packagings for testing. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, each Large Packaging and package must be closed in preparation for testing and tests must be carried out in the same manner as if prepared for transportation, including inner packagings. All closures must be installed using proper techniques and torques.
( b ) For the drop and stacking test, inner receptacles must be filled to not less than 95 percent of maximum capacity (*see* § 171.8 of this subchapter) in the case of solids and not less than 98 percent of maximum in the case of liquids. Bags must be filled to the maximum mass at which they may be used. For Large Packagings where the inner packagings are designed to carry liquids and solids, separate testing is required for both liquid and solid contents. The material to be transported in the packagings may be replaced by a non-hazardous material, except for chemical compatibility testing or where this would invalidate the results of the tests.
( c ) If the material to be transported is replaced for test purposes by a non-hazardous material, the material used must be of the same or higher specific gravity as the material to be carried, and its other physical properties (grain, size, viscosity) which might influence the results of the required tests must correspond as closely as possible to those of the hazardous material to be transported. It is permissible to use additives, such as bags of lead shot, to achieve the requisite total package mass, so long as they do not affect the test results.
( d ) Paper or fiberboard Large Packagings must be conditioned for at least 24 hours immediately prior to testing in an atmosphere maintained— ( 1 ) At 50 percent ±2 percent relative humidity, and at a temperature of 23 °C ±2 °C (73 °F ±4 °F). Average values should fall within these limits. Short-term fluctuations and measurement limitations may cause individual measurements to vary by up to ±5 percent relative humidity without significant impairment of test reproducibility;
( 2 ) At 65 percent ±2 percent relative humidity, and at a temperature of 20 °C ±2 °C (68 °F ±4 °F), or 27 °C ±2 °C (81 °F ±4 °F). Average values should fall within these limits. Short-term fluctuations and measurement limitations may cause individual measurements to vary by up to ±5 percent relative humidity without significant impairment of test reproducibility; or
( 3 ) For testing at periodic intervals only (*i.e.,* other than initial design qualification testing), at ambient conditions.
§ 214.107 Working over or adjacent to water. ( a ) Bridge workers working over or adjacent to water with a depth of four feet or more, or where the danger of drowning exists, shall be provided and shall use life vests or buoyant work vests in compliance with U.S. Coast Guard requirements in 46 CFR 160.047, 160.052, and 160.053. Life preservers in compliance with U.S. Coast Guard requirements in 46 CFR 160.055 shall also be within ready access. This section shall not apply to bridge workers using personal fall arrest systems or safety nets that comply with this subpart or to bridge workers who are working under the provisions of § 214.103(b)(2), (c) or (d) of this subpart.
( b ) Prior to each use, all flotation devices shall be inspected for defects that reduce their strength or buoyancy by designated individuals trained by the railroad or railroad contractor. Defective units shall not be used.
( c ) Where life vests are required by paragraph (a) of this section, ring buoys with at least 90 feet of line shall be provided and readily available for emergency rescue operations. Distance between ring buoys shall not exceed 200 feet.
( d ) Where life vests are required, at least one lifesaving skiff, inflatable boat, or equivalent device shall be immediately available. If it is determined by a competent person that environmental conditions, including weather, water speed, and terrain, merit additional protection, the skiff or boat shall be manned.
[70 FR 7050, Feb. 10, 2005]
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United Bancorporation
of Alabama, Inc. for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Mitchell D. Staples, principal accounting officer of the Corporation, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1). The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and(2). The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Corporation. Date: November 15, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Mitchell D. StaplesMitchell D. Staplesprincipal accounting officer
#### § 299.311 Track geometry; general.

If the values listed in the following table are exceeded, the railroad shall initiate remedial action. A reduction in operating speed so that the condition complies with the limits listed for a lower speed shall constitute bringing the track into compliance.

Table 1 to [§ 299.311](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-299.311)

| Track geometry parameter (millimeter (mm)) | Track class | H0 | H1 | H2 | H3 | H4 | H5 | H6 | H7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Gauge is measured between the heads of the rails at right angles to the rails in a plane 14 mm (0.55 inches) below the top of the rail head and may not exceed— | Min. | 1429 | 1429 | 1429 | 1429 | 1429 | 1429 | 1429 | 1429 |
| | Max. | 1454 | 1454 | 1454 | 1454 | 1454 | 1454 | 1454 | 1454 |
| The deviation from uniformity1 of the mid-chord offset on either rail for a 10 meter (m) chord (alignment) may not be more than— | 10 m chord | 38 | 31 | 31 | 14 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 7 |
| The deviation from uniform profile on either rail at the mid-ordinate of a 10 m chord (surface) may not be more than— | 10 m chord | 40 | 40 | 40 | 27 | 22 | 18 | 15 | 13 |
| The deviation from uniform crosslevel at any point on tangent and curved track may not be more than— | | 50 | 26 | 26 | 22 | 18 | 14 | 9 | 9 |
| The difference in crosslevel between any two points 2.5 meters (8.2 feet) apart (twist) may not be more than— | 2.5 m | 26 | 26 | 26 | 22 | 18 | 14 | 9 | 9 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Uniformity for alignment at any point along the track is established by averaging the measured mid-chord offset values for a 10 m (32.8 feet) chord for nine consecutive points that are centered around that point and spaced at 2.5 m (8.2 feet) intervals. | | | | | | | | | |
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

July 16, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00114

- CV

Zulema GARZA

, Appellant

v.

Zulema J. GARZA , Jose Juan Garza, III, Andres Garza, Alejandro Garza, and Gabriel Garza, Appellees

From the 49th Judicial District Court

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- CVK

- 002209

- D1 Honorable Joe Lopez , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On June 28, 2021, we issued an order noting that appellant’s brief was late. We ordered appellant to file her brief and a written response explaining her failure to timely file the brief by July 13, 2021. In response to our June 28 order, appellant filed a letter we construe as a motion for extension of time to file her brief. Appellant’s letter stated she is a pro se litigant, explained that she has recently been involved in an accident, and requested “an extension of at least 2 weeks’ time.”

After consideration, appellant’s request for an extension of time is GRANTED . We ORDER appellant to file her brief by Ju ly 30, 2021 . We caution appellant that pro se litigants are held to the same standards as licensed attorneys and are required to comply with the applicable rules of procedure. See,
e.g. , Dunlap v. Trois , No. 04

- 19

- 00488

- CV, 2020 WL 7633952, at *2 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Dec. 23, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op.).

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of July, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VICORPRestaurants, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 27,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), each of the undersigned, Debra Koenig, Chief Executive Officerof the Company, and Anthony Carroll, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his or herknowledge and belief, that: 

 

1)              the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and

 

2)              the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: April 15, 2005 | /s/ Debra Koenig        |   |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                      | Debra Koenig            |
|                      | Chief Executive Officer |
|                      |                    |
|                      |                    |
| Date: April 15, 2005 | /s/ Anthony Carroll     |   |
|                      | Anthony Carroll         |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to VICORP Restaurants, Inc. and will be retained by VICORPRestaurants, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### § 236.327 Switch, movable-point frog or split-point derail.

Switch, movable-point frog, or split-point derail equipped with lock rod shall be maintained so that it can not be locked when the point is open three-eighths inch or more.

[49 FR 3385, Jan. 26, 1984]
October 21, 2015

Mr. Michael Hudson

2268 Quail Avenue

Afton, IA 50830

Dear Mr. Hudson:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

sections of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request, posted to the public docket on July 17, 2015, and filed in 

Docket No. FAA−2015−2997, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your 

petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider 

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
The Honorable Herman G. Honanie

Chairman ofthe Hopi Tribe

P.O. Box 123Kykotsrnovi, Arizona 86039

Dear Chairman Honanie:Thank you for your letter dated January 31, 2014, regarding the U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency’s (EPA’s) proposed rulemaking for the Navajo Generating Station (NGS). In your letter, you describe the current status of your request for information from the Department ofthe Interior and

request that EPA continue to accept comments from the Hopi Tribe until April 17, 2014.

Representatives from the Department ofthe Interior and the Bureau of Reclamation have expressed

support to EPA for your extension request.

In a letter dated December 16, 2013, you requested documents from EPA, including air pollutant emissions data and air permits issued to NGS. By letter dated January 7, 2014, EPA provided to you the documents responsive to your request. As discussed in that letter, EPA was exercising its discretion to

accept late comments from affected Tribes until February 5, 2014. The Hopi Tribe is the only Tribe that

has requested additional time beyond this date. EPA will continue to exercise its discretion and will

accept late comments from the 1-lopi Tribe until March 21, 2014.

If you have additional questions or concerns, please contact me at (415) 972-8702. Any questions you

may have related to the information we provided to you on January 7, 2014 may be directed to Ms.

Colleen McKaughan, Associate Director, Air Division, at (520) 498-0118, or Ms. Anita Lee, ofthe Air

Planning Office, at (415) 972-3958.

cc: Alletta Belin, U.S. Department ofthe Interior

David Palumbo, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation

Sincerely,

Blumenfeld

Printed on Recycled Paper
#### Frederic Currie et al., Doing Business under the Firm Name of Currie & Boyce, Appellants, *v.*Frank J. Sprague, Respondent.

(Submitted November 21, 1910;

decided November 29, 1910.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 199 N. Y. 566.)
§ 29.418 May a funding agreement include transfers of State funds? ( a ) A State may elect to provide a portion of Federal-aid funds apportioned to the State under chapter 1 of title 23 of the U.S. Code to an eligible Tribe for a project eligible under 23 U.S.C. 202(a).
( b ) If a State provides such funds, the transfer may occur in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 202(a)(9), 23 U.S.C. 207(d)(2)(A)(ii), or the State may transfer the funds to the Department, and the Department will transfer the funds to the participating Tribe through the Tribe's funding agreement.
( c ) If a State provides such funds, the Tribe (and not the State) will be responsible for: ( 1 ) Constructing and maintaining any projects carried out using the funds;
( 2 ) Administering and supervising the projects and funds in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 207;
( 3 ) Complying with applicable post-construction requirements.
( d ) The receipt of any State funds transferred at the election of a State to the Tribe pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 202(a)(9), 23 U.S.C. 207(d)(2)(A)(ii), or funds awarded to a State pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5311 that are transferred at the election of a State to the Federal Transit Administration for the benefit of a Tribe does not entitle the Tribe to receive contract support costs under 25 U.S.C. 5325(a). While a Tribe is not entitled to additional funds for contract supports costs, a Tribe may use a portion of such State funds for overhead and administrative expenses if such costs are reasonable, allowable, and allocable in accordance with 2 CFR part 200 and the statutory and regulatory requirements applicable to the funding source.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, October 19, 1995 (131), Para 131.23 Time Limitation on Referred Bill]
[Page 1569]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.131.23  time limitation on referred bill

  Pursuant to clause 5 of rule X the following action was taken by the 
Speaker:

       H.R. 994. Referral to the Committee on the Judiciary 
     extended for a period ending not later than November 3, 1995.
```
#### William Youmans, *Respondent, v.*James A. Francisco, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
**EXHIBIT    31.3**

 

> PRINCIPAL OPERATING OFFICER CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kirby J.    Taylor, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed    this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Champion Industries, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge,    this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of    the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with    respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge,    the financial statements, and other financial information included in this    report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results    of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods    presented in this report;

4.     The registrant's    other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining    disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)    and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

>   

> a)    Designed such disclosure    controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures    to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period    in which this report is being prepared;b)    Evaluated the effectiveness    of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this    report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on    such evaluation; andc)     Disclosed in this    report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting    that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's    fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially    affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal    control over financial reporting;  and

5.     The registrant's    other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation    of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors    and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons    performing the equivalent functions): 

>   

> a)    All significant deficiencies    and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over    financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's    ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)    Any fraud, whether or    not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant    role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:     January 17, 2005

/s/ Kirby    J. Taylor

Kirby J. Taylor    

President    & Chief Operating Officer

****
-----Original Message----- 

From: ronnemickey@yahoo.com [mailto:ronnemickey@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 7:26 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 01, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ronne Mickey 

97089 Castle Ridge Dr 

Yulee, FL 32097
-----Original Message----- 

From: barbarajl@webtv.net [mailto:barbarajl@webtv.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:54 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Barbara Lingo 

106W. Market 

Piper City, IL 60959