alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1576

In re: ROBERT KOGER,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:14-cr-00018-LO-1)

Submitted: September 14, 2021 Decided: September 17, 2021

Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Koger, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Koger petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district 

court to order the Government to respond to Koger’s motion to unseal a portion of the 

record. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that, by order entered May 20, 

2021, the district court directed the Government to respond and the Government did so on 

May 28, 2021. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
From: cylnar@yahoo.com [mailto:cylnar@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:29 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ross McKenzie 

3298-C E Foothills Dr. 

Sierra Vista, AZ 85635
EXHIBIT 99.1

                              MAMMATECH CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mammatech Corporation (the
Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28,2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Henry S.
Pennypacker, President and Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

By:  /s/  Henry S. Pennypacker              Dated: May 14, 2003
  ----------------------------------               ------------
          Henry S. Pennypacker
          President, Chief Executive Officer


         This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
                          REPRO-MED SYSTEMS, INC.

                       EDGAR FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE 
                        TAG LIST FOR ARTICLE TYPE 5
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  Feb-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       Nov-30-1997
<CASH>                                                 902,407
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          311,085
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                            729,291
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     2,147,825
<PP&E>                                               2,300,352
<DEPRECIATION>                                         592,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       4,054,222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  455,695
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                100
<COMMON>                                               221,420
<OTHER-SE>                                           2,022,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         4,054,222
<SALES>                                              1,903,819
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     1,903,819
<CGS>                                                  595,537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        1,650,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      80,845
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          2,759
<INCOME-TAX>                                           (81,943)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     84,702
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                            84,702
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0
        


</TABLE>
#### §§ 1572.24-1572.40 [Reserved]
§ 180.513 Repairs, alterations, conversions, and modifications. ( a ) To work on tank cars, a tank car facility must comply with the applicable requirements of this subpart, the AAR Specifications for Tank Cars (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter), and the owner's requirements.
( b ) *Responsibilities of Tank Car Facility.* A tank car facility must obtain the permission of the equipment owner before performing work affecting alteration, conversion, repair, or qualification of the owner's equipment. For the purposes of qualification and maintenance, the tank car facility must use the written instructions furnished by the owner or have written confirmation from the owner allowing the use of written instructions furnished by the owner or have written confirmation from the owner allowing the use of written instructions furnished by another. A tank car facility must not use, copy distribute, forward or provide to another person the owner's confidential and proprietary written instructions, procedures, manuals, and records without the owner's permission. A tank car facility must report all work performed to the owner. The tank car facility must also report observed damage, deterioration, failed components, or non-compliant parts to the owner. A tank car facility must incorporate the owner's Quality Assurance Program into their own Quality Assurance Program.
( c ) Unless the exterior tank car shell or interior tank car jacket has a protective coating, after a repair that requires the complete removal of the tank car jacket, the exterior tank car shell and the interior tank car jacket must have a protective coating applied to prevent the deterioration of the tank shell and tank jacket. Previously applied coatings that still provide effective protection need not be covered over.
( d ) After repair, replacement, or qualification of tank car service equipment, the tank service equipment must successfully pass the leak test prescribed in § 180.509(j).
[77 FR 37990, June 25, 2012]
#### § 1548.13 Security coordinators.

Each indirect air carrier must designate and use an Indirect Air Carrier Security Coordinator (IACSC). The IACSC and alternates must be appointed at the corporate level and must serve as the indirect air carrier's primary contact for security-related activities and communications with TSA, as set forth in the security program. Either the IACSC or an alternate IACSC must be available on a 24-hour basis.

[71 FR 30515, May 26, 2006]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, July 25, 1995 (101), Para 101.4 Approval of the Journal]
[Page 1187]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.101.4  approval of the journal

  The SPEAKER announced he had examined and approved the Journal of the 
proceedings of Monday, July 24, 1995.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal was approved.
```
DRAFT #4 DRAFT #4 DRAFT #4 

By e-Rulemaking:

May 3rd, 2010 

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Room 445-G 

Hubert H. Humphrey Building 

200 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20201 

Attention: Interim Final Rules under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental 

Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008; Final Rule

Partners HealthCare System, Inc. is pleased to comment on the Interim Final Rules under 

the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 

2008; Final Rule on behalf of its member institutions providing inpatient psychiatric 

services: 

Institution Provider Number 

 

 Faulkner Hospital 220119 

 Massachusetts General Hospital 220071 

 McLean Hospital* 224007 

 Newton-Wellesley Hospital 220101 

 Union Hospital 220035 

*McLean Hospital is submitting a separating comment letter. 
Draft #4 Draft #4 Draft #4 

Partners HealthCare System Page 2 of 2 

Boston, MA May 3rd, 2010 

We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this regulation and are very supportive of 

the overall direction of the Interim Final Rule. We believe that its passage will provide 

needed access to mental health services for patients. We have had positive experience in 

Massachusetts with its Parity Laws: insurance treatment for behavioral health was much 

improved by removing arbitrary day and dollar benefit limitations for certain conditions. 

However, current laws do not address the onerous and arbitrary practices employed by 

mental health managed care firms hired by many insurers to manage mental health 

services (Carve-Out firms). Compared to medical/surgical insurers, these Carve-Out 

firms require far more onerous pre-admission screenings, concurrent reviews and 

application of medical necessity standards, resulting in micro-managing of clinicians’ 

judgment and best treatment for their patients. In addition to the monetary limitations 

mentioned above, we believe that onerous over-sight practices should also be limited to 

truly achieve parity for mental health and substance disorder services. 

It is also important to point out that, in order to have parity to medical/surgical care, 

mental health and substance disorder benefits should include all appropriate levels of 

care, such inpatient, residential, partial hospital and outpatient. These levels of care are 

comparable to the acute inpatient and its subsequent post-acute services. 

We appreciate the opportunity to offer these comments and would be available to answer 

any questions. 

Sincerely, 

Anthony Santangelo
-----Original Message----- 

From: thesoil02@isp.com [mailto:thesoil02@isp.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:45 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

richard johnson 

2605 8th St S Apt 541D 

Arlington, VA 22204
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  March 29, 2010
    /s/ Bruce J. BarrettBruce J. Barrett,President and Chief Executive OfficerDated:  March 29, 2010
    /s/ William M. IaconaWilliam M. Iacona,Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Treasurer
#### § 230.63 Smoke box, steam pipes and pressure parts.

The smoke box, steam pipes and pressure parts shall be inspected at each annual inspection, or any other time that conditions warrant. The individual conducting the inspection must enter the smoke box to conduct the inspection, looking for signs of leaks from any of the pressure parts therein and examining all draft appliances.
-----Original Message----- 

From: blackoutrr@aol.com [mailto:blackoutrr@aol.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 9:12 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Erik Redin 

77 Hilltop Drive 

Trumbull, CT 06611
#### § 230.22 Accident reports.

In the case of an accident due to failure, from any cause, of a steam locomotive boiler or any part or appurtenance thereof, resulting in serious injury or death to one or more persons, the railroad on whose line the accident occurred shall immediately make a telephone report of the accident by calling the National Response Center (toll free) at Area Code 800-424-0201. The report shall state the nature of the accident, the number of persons killed or seriously injured, the place at which it occurred, and the location where the steam locomotive may be inspected. Confirmation of this report shall be immediately mailed to the Associate Administrator for Safety, Federal Railroad Administration, Washington, DC 20590, and contain a detailed report of the accident, including, to the extent known, the causes and a complete list of the casualties.
#### Joseph H. Van Winkle and others, *Respondents, v.*John Flower and John E. Eldred, *Appellants*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-1027.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Information Exchange 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and POLAND 

Amending the 

Agreement of June 9, 1995 

Signed at Arlington and Warsaw 

October 16 and 27, 2009 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 POLAND 

 Defense: Information Exchange 

 Agreement amending the agreement of June 9, 1995. 

 Signed at Arlington and Warsaw October 16 and 27, 2009; 

 Entered into force October 27, 2009.
Order filed, February 7,2020

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00062

- CV

____________ JANINE SCHORR MORR ISON AND ANN

- MARIE S EPUKA , Appellant

V.
TNG BENEFITS, LLC D/ B/A THE NOBLE GROUP , Appellee

On Appeal from th e 434th Judicial District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 19

- DCV

- 266198



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due February 3, 2020

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The r ecord has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Rhonda Colgin , the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal
within 15 days of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM

Pane l Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell and Poissant.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 6, 1995 (110), Para 110.6 Enrolled Bills Signed]
[Page 1302]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.110.6  enrolled bills signed

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, announced that pursuant to 
clause 4, rule I, the Speaker pro tempore, Mr. Davis, signed the 
following enrolled bills on the following dates:

           On August 11, 1995:

       H.R. 2161. An Act to extend authorities under the Middle 
     Peace Facilitation Act of 1994 until October 1, 1995, and for 
     other purposes.

           On August 17, 1995:

       H.R. 535. An Act to direct the Secretary of the Interior to 
     convey the Corning National Fish Hatchery to the State of 
     Arkansas.

       H.R. 584. An Act to direct the Secretary of the Interior to 
     convey a fish hatchery to the State of Iowa.

       H.R. 614. An Act to direct the Secretary of the Interior to 
     convey to the State of Minnesota the New London National Fish 
     Hatchery Production Facility.

       H.R. 1225. An Act to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 
     1938 to exempt employees who perform certain court reporting 
     duties from compensatory time requirements applicable to 
     certain public agencies, and for other purposes.

       H.R. 2077. An Act to designate the United States Post 
     Office Building located at 33 College Avenue in Waterville, 
     Maine, as the ``George J. Mitchell Post Office Building''.

       H.R. 2108. An Act to permit the Washington Convention 
     Center Authority to expend revenues for the operation and 
     maintenance of the Existing Washington Convention Center and 
     for preconstruction activities relating to a new convention 
     center in the District of Columbia, to permit a designated 
     authority of the District of Columbia to borrow funds for the 
     preconstruction activities relating to a sports arena in the 
     District of Columbia and to permit certain revenues to be 
     pledged as security for the borrowing of such funds, and for 
     other purposes.
```
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - II (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General Partner and
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

        (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  the operations of the Partnership.


              May 17, 2004                       /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
              ------------                       ------------------------------
                  Date                           Joseph M. Jayson,
                                                 Individual General Partner and
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
Argued December 5,

affirmed December 27, 1917,

rehearing denied January 29,

supplemental petition for rehearing denied February 19, 1918.

#### REED *v.*OREGON-WASH. R. & N. CO.

(169 Pac. 346.)

Prom Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge.

This is a suit by Minnie T. Reed against the Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company, a corporation, to reform a deed and enjoin trespassing upon plaintiff’s premises. Prom a decree adverse to plaintiff, she appealed.

Affirmed.

Por appellant there was a brief and an oral argument by *Mr. Ralph R. Duniway.*

Por respondent there was a brief over the names of *Mr. Arthur G. Spencer, Mr. William W. Cotton, Mr. W. A. Robbins*and *Mr. Charles E. Cochran,*with an oral argument by *Mr. Spencer.*

Department 2.

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit was commenced July 28, 1915, by Minnie T. Reed against the Oregon-Washington Railroad *&*Navigation Company, a corporation, to reform a deed executed April 2, 1907, by the plaintiff and her husband to the defendant’s predecessor; to enjoin interference with or trespassing upon her real property, and to recover $3,000 as damages for injuries to her lands. The complaint in this suit is similar to the cross-bill filed in the case of the defendant herein as plaintiff against Mrs. Reed and her husband. The answer in this suit denies the material averments of the complaint, and for a further defense sets forth *422the facts in substance as stated in the complaint in the suit last mentioned. The reply herein put in issue the allegations of new matter in the answer to which it is responsive. Based on these issues the cause was tried with that of the Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company, a corporation, against Frank H. Reed and Minnie T. Reed, resulting in special findings by the jury as detailed in the statement of facts preceding the opinion in that case. Founded upon these special verdicts and a consideration of the evidence received, it was decreed that the Railroad Company was the owner and entitled to the possession of all the real property conveyed to it April 2, 1907, by Mr. and Mrs. Reed, who with their agents, etc., were perpetually enjoined from interfering with or trespassing upon such real property, except at a private right of way to be made and maintained by them across the railway track in such a manner, however, as not actually, imminently or potentially to injure the Railroad Company or prevent it from using such real property for railway purposes, and refusing to award to Mrs. Reed any damages. From this decree she appeals.

The facts involved in the case of the Oregon-Washington Railroad *&*Navigation Company against Mr. and Mrs. Reed, and the reasons upon which our decision rests, are deemed to have been sufficiently set forth in the opinion in that suit, thereby rendering it unnecessary further to consider any of the questions presented by this appeal. The decree herein is therefore affirmed. Affirmed. Rehearing Denied.

Supplemental Petition for Rehearing Denied.

Mr. Chief Justice McBride, Mr. Justice McCamant and Mr. Justice Burnett concur.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000826 13-AUG-2014 08:23 AM