alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

          - [Transmittal Nos. 07-41] 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 07-41 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology. 

Dated: August 8, 2007. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. 

      ( print page 45782)          ( print page 45783)          ( print page 45784)          ( print page 45785)          ( print page 45786)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M 

[FR Doc. 07-3984  Filed 8-14-07; 8:45 am] 

                BILLING CODE 5001-01-C                       ( print page 45787)
From: Anderson GySgt Jason V [mailto:jason.anderson1@3mef.usmc.mil] 

Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 1:11 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32 

I have read about this several times before and am apauled that once again the current administration is 

even considering taking my small fortune that I amassed for my “Golden Years” they already took my 

health care I want them to stay away from my retirement savings
-----Original Message----- 

From: angeldragon0928@aol.com [mailto:angeldragon0928@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:34 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Mary Sasko 

38472 Hood St 

Sandy, OR 97055
§ 220.9 Requirements for trains. ( a ) Except as provided for in paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section, on and after July 1, 1999, each occupied controlling locomotive in a train shall have a working radio, and each train shall also have communications redundancy. For purposes of this section, “communications redundancy” means a working radio on another locomotive in the consist or other means of working wireless communications.
( b ) On and after July 1, 2000, the following requirements apply to a railroad that has fewer than 400,000 annual employee work hours: ( 1 ) Any train that transports passengers shall be equipped with a working radio in the occupied controlling locomotive and with redundant working wireless communications capability in the same manner as provided in paragraph (a) of this section.
( 2 ) Any train that operates at greater than 25 miles per hour; or engages in joint operations on track where the maximum authorized speed for freight trains exceeds 25 miles per hour; or engages in joint operations on a track that is adjacent to and within 30 feet measured between track center lines of another track on which the maximum authorized speed for passenger trains exceeds 40 miles per hour, shall be equipped with a working radio in the occupied controlling locomotive.
( 3 ) Any train that engages in joint operations, where the maximum authorized speed of the track is 25 miles per hour or less, shall be equipped with working wireless communications in the occupied controlling locomotive.
( 4 ) Any train not described in paragraph (b) of this section that transports hazardous material required to be placarded under the provisions of part 172 of this title shall be equipped with working wireless communications in the occupied controlling locomotive.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,054,506
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,775,893
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,320,990
<PP&E>                                      18,048,474
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,832,121
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,779,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,211,458
<BONDS>                                     16,544,208
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       394,777
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,629,121
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,779,564
<SALES>                                     10,071,986
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,071,986
<CGS>                                        8,266,891
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,266,891
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             394,448
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (472,785)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (472,785)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (472,785)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)
        

</TABLE>
SERVED: FEBRUARY 28, 2012 

.-l-PARTMEMTOF 

-OCKETOPrRAIiOMS 

• m FED 7 ^ P 1^ i-i8 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

WESTERN TIRE EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY CO., INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. jTO BE ASSIGNED! 

(Civil Penalty Case) 

FDMS No. FAA-201M29I 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On December 13, 2011. ihe Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") 

filed a Complaint. On December 2, 2011, Western.Tire Equipment and Supply Co., Inc. 

("Respondent") had filed a Request for Hearing. On February 28, 2012, Complainant 

filed a Motion to Withdraw Complaint, citing settlement. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states; "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, Complainant's Motion to Withdraw Complaint having been read 

and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 
1. Complainant's Mo(ion to Wiliidraw Complaint be and is licieby granted; 

and 

2. This proceeding he and is heieby dismissed wiih picjudicc. 

Richard C Goodwin 

U.S. Admini.stiaiivc Law Judge 

Attachment ~ Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-20] 1-129; 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W) ODD' 

ONE COPY 

Chris Deraias, President 

Western Tire Equipment and Supply Co., Inc., Respondent 

14802 Yorba Court 

Chino,CA 91710 

TEL: 909-303-4880 

FAX: 909-393-6747 

Christopher Merrill, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7.3 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7105 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

^ Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Ad mini strati on, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Wasliington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2-
#### § 1584.1 Scope.

This part includes requirements for persons providing transportation by an over-the-road bus (OTRB). Specific sections in this part provide detailed requirements.
#### International Harvester Company, appellee, v. Stephen Schultz, appellant.

Filed November 16, 1918.

No. 20142.

Guaranty: Payment of Note. A guaranty written on certain negotiable promissory notes was in the following form: “Por value received, I hereby guarantee the payment of the within note, and all renewals, and extensions thereof, to the payee therein named, or any owner and holder thereof; and I .hereby waive protest, due presentment, demand and notice of nonpayment thereof, and I hereby waive diligence on the part of any holder thereof in collecting said note and all defenses arising,out of lack of diligence in enforcing payment thereof.” *Held,*to be a contract to pay the notes in suit by the guarantor upon default by the respective makers at maturity.

Appeal from the district court for Adams county: Harry S. Dungan, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*J. W. James,*for appellant.

*T. J Doyle, contra.*

Dean, J.

This is a suit to recover on a guaranty of payment of 44 negotiable promissory notes. The makers were not made parties defendant. A jury was waived. Plaintiff recovered judgment for $1,927.39 and costs. Defendant appealed.

Defendant purchased farm machinery from plaintiff and sold it to his customers, taking the notes sued on in payment. Some were payable to defendant’s order and some to plaintiff’s order. All of the notes were delivered to plaintiff before maturity. The makers defaulted at maturity and defendant refused payment. The guaranty that was written on the notes appears in the syllabus.

Two questions are presented: First, is the guaranty an independent contract by defendant to pay to plain*754tiff the amount due on the respective notes on failure of makers'to pay at maturity? second, are any of the costs taxable to plaintiff?

The law seems to be settled that the guaranty sued on is a contract to pay the notes on failure of the makers to pay at maturity. *Bloom & Co. v. Warder, Mitchell & Co.,*13 Neb. 476; *Bickford v. Gibbs,*8 Cush. (Mass.) 154. In view of the comprehensive terms of the guaranty, plaintiff was under no obligation to undertake the collection of the notes' from the makers, nor to make them ■ parties defendant.

Each of the 44 notes was separately stated as a cause of action. While the suit was pending 28 of the notes were paid to plaintiff by the respective makers, and as to such notes the causes of action were dismissed and judgment was rendered for plaintiff on the remaining notes. Defendant argues that, because the suit was dismissed as to the notes paid, a part of the costs should therefore be taxed to plaintiff. His contention cannot prevail. • The power of courts to award and tax costs in legal proceedings was unknown at the common law. *Branson v. Branson,*84 Neb. 288. We have no statute in this state authorizing the court to apportion any part of the costs against plaintiff in an action involving such facts as are presented by the record before us. It follows that, in the absence of such statute the prevailing party is entitled to recover costs. 15 C. J. p. 28, sec. 14.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Sedwick, J., concurs in the conclusion.
-----Original Message----- 

From: KatzLaf@msn.com [mailto:KatzLaf@msn.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:07 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Mental Health care does help keep health care costs down as it reduces 

the cost of many physical illnesses which are made worse by mental 

health conditions. Furthermore, mental health care helps to keep many 

Americans functioning and working in our society, helps keep crime 

down, and helps keep the quality of life for many people at an 

acceptable level. 

Almost everyone knows someone affected by mental illness. Mental 

illness affects the body just as physical illness and was just as 

unsolicited by the people that suffer from it. Without access to 

treatment, many sufferers are doomed to a poor quality of life, 

needless suffering, and even death. 

Please continue to see that all people continue to receive equal access 

to health care whether it is for a physical or mental illness. 

Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

Mary Lafia 

8825 Wallaby Lane 

Las Vegas, NV 89123 

Sincerely, 

Mary Lafia 

8825 Wallaby Lane 

Las Vegas, NV 89123
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

December 5, 2011

Memorandum

Subject: SCAQMD Emissions Inventory Methodology

From: Wienke Tax, EPA Region 9, Air Division, Planning Office (AIR-2)

To: South Coast 8-hour Ozone Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0622

I spoke with the following South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD or District) staff 

on November 30, 2011 about their inventory development process: Xinqiu Zhang, Ali Ghasemi, Susan 

Yan, Kathy Hsiao, and Joe Cassmassi.

SCAQMD staff indicated that the 2002 base year inventory in the South Coast 2007 Air Quality 

Management Plan (AQMP) is based on reported emissions, not estimated emissions, and therefore rule 

effectiveness is not factored into the emissions estimates. District staff confirmed that except for SC 

Rule 461, stationary point and area source emissions projections that the SCAQMD developed as inputs 

to projected future baseline inventories included an assumption of 100% RE. 

In addition, SCAQMD staff indicated that the District has an active compliance inspection program, 

particularly for sources emitting 4 tpy or greater, which are inspected on a regular basis. In addition to 

unannounced inspections, smaller sources are certified at the manufacturing level to ensure that only 

compliant products are sold. When noncompliance is found, a significant penalty can result, which acts 

as a deterrent to noncompliance. Compliance reports are presented to the District Governing Board and 

to Board Committees.
§ 212.203 Track inspector. ( a ) The track inspector is required, at a minimum, to be able to conduct independent inspections of track structures for the purpose of determining compliance with the Track Safety Standards (49 CFR part 213), to make reports of those inspections, and to recommend the institution of enforcement actions when appropriate to promote compliance.
( b ) The track inspector is required, at a minimum to have at least four years of recent experience in track construction or maintenance. A bachelor's degree in engineering or a related technical specialization may be substituted for two of the four years of this experience requirement and successful completion of the apprentice training program may be substituted for the four years of this experience requirement.
( c ) The track inspector shall demonstrate the following specific qualifications: ( 1 ) A comprehensive knowledge of track nomenclature, track inspection techniques, track maintenance methods, and track equipment;
( 2 ) The ability to understand and detect deviations from: ( i ) Track maintenance standards accepted in the industry; and
( ii ) The Track Safety Standards (49 CFR part 213).
( 3 ) Knowledge of operating practices and vehicle/track interaction sufficient to understand the safety significance of deviations and combinations of deviations; and
( 4 ) Specialized knowledge of the requirements of the Track Safety Standards, including the remedial action required to bring defective track into compliance with the standards.
PUBLIC LAW 109–39—JULY 27, 2005 119 STAT. 409

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 52 (S.J. Res. 18):

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109–101 accompanying S.J. Res. 18 (Comm. on Finance).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

June 21, considered and passed House.

July 19, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–39

109th Congress

Joint Resolution

Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese Freedom

and Democracy Act of 2003.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress

approves the renewal of the import restrictions contained in section

3(a)(1) of the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

Approved July 27, 2005.

50 USC 1701

note.

July 27, 2005

[H.J. Res. 52]
#### § 230.103 Tender roller bearing journal boxes.

Tender roller bearing journal boxes shall be maintained in a safe and suitable condition.
Editorial Note on Part 193
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

§ 193.2907 Protective enclosure construction. ( a ) Each protective enclosure must have sufficient strength and configuration to obstruct unauthorized access to the facilities enclosed.
( b ) Openings in or under protective enclosures must be secured by grates, doors or covers of construction and fastening of sufficient strength such that the integrity of the protective enclosure is not reduced by any opening.
[Amdt. 193-2, 45 FR 70409, Oct. 23, 1980, as amended by Amdt. 193-12, 61 FR 27793, June 3, 1996; 61 FR 45905, Aug. 30, 1996]
§ 214.355 Training and qualification of each roadway worker in on-track safety for operators of roadway maintenance machines. ( a ) The training and qualification of roadway workers who operate roadway maintenance machines shall include, as a minimum: ( 1 ) Procedures to prevent a person from being struck by the machine when the machine is in motion or operation.
( 2 ) Procedures to prevent any part of the machine from being struck by a train or other equipment on another track.
( 3 ) Procedures to provide for stopping the machine short of other machines or obstructions on the track.
( 4 ) Methods to determine safe operating procedures for each machine that the operator is expected to operate.
( b ) Initial and periodic (as specified by § 243.201 of this chapter) qualification of a roadway worker to operate roadway maintenance machines shall be evidenced by demonstrated proficiency.
[61 FR 65976, Dec. 16, 1996, as amended at 81 FR 37890, June 10, 2016]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Sterling Gas Drilling Fund 1982 (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles E. Drimal Jr., Chief Executive Officer of PrimeEnergy Management Corporation, the Managing General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

/s/ Charles E. Drimal Jr.

-----------------------------

Chief Executive Officer

August 12, 2003

 

 

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Sterling Gas Drilling Fund 1982 (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Beverly A. Cummings, Chief Financial Officer of PrimeEnergy Management Corporation, the Managing General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

/s/ Beverly A. Cummings

------------------------------

Chief Financial Officer

August 12, 2003
From: todd@toddjonker.net [mailto:todd@toddjonker.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:35 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Todd Jonker 

124 Bellevue Ave E Unit 302 

Seattle, WA 98102