alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
EnergyNorth, Inc. condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30,
1999 and condensed consolidated statement of income and statement of cash
flows for the nine months ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      110,282<F1>
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      8,116<F2>
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          24,580
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        15,131
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   2,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 160,345
<COMMON>                                         3,320
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       32,506
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             20,255
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  56,081
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            45,731
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               3,926
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      850
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  53,757
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  160,345
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      101,111
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             5,028
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      84,782
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      89,810
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         11,301
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 983
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  12,284
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         3,771
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,513
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    8,513
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         3,386
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,569<F3>
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          13,970
<EPS-BASIC>                                    $2.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Net of accumulated depreciation of $54,902
<F2>Net of accumulated depreciation of $11,092
<F3>$3,569 represents the forecasted annual interest on bonds for the fiscal
year ending September 30, 1999.  Actual interest on bonds for the nine months
ended June 30, 1999 was $2,679.
</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 236.586 Daily or after trip test. ( a ) Except where tests prescribed by § 236.588 are performed at intervals of not more than 2 months, each locomotive equipped with an automatic cab signal or train stop or train control device operating in equipped territory shall be inspected for damage to the equipment and tested at least once each calendar day or within 24 hours before departure upon each trip.
( b ) Each equipped locomotive shall be tested to determine the locomotive equipment is responsive to the wayside equipment and shall be cycled to determine the device functions as intended.
( c ) Each locomotive equipped with intermittent inductive automatic train stop or non-coded continuous inductive automatic train stop or non-coded continuous inductive automatic train control device shall be tested to determine that the pickup of the device is within specified limits.
[49 FR 3387, Jan. 26, 1984]
I, Richard R. Schreiber, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 2) of Chief Consolidated Mining Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 19, 2007


/s/ Richard R. Schreiber
Richard R. Schreiber
Chief Financial Officer


---
Exhibit 31-2



Certification

I, Kenneth M. Jasinski, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of Energy East Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  March 8, 2004 | /s/Kenneth M. Jasinski       Kenneth M. Jasinski
       Executive Vice President
         and Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the “Reform Act”) and 14 

CFR Part 11, Richard Devine, operator of an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS), hereby applies for an 

exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) to allow commercial operation of its 

UAS, so long as such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein or as 

may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333. 

Commercial operation of an UAS, as described herein, which are equipped with camera(s) and sensors, 

would operate in the following manner:

1. Aerial photography and/or video for public and/or private use including real estate, architecture, land 

surveying, engineering and other related professional activities. 2. Aerial video and/or photography for 

public and/or private use including television, public events, cinematography and news gathering. 3. 

Aerial inspection/photography of residential/commercial structures under contract with the owners or 

local government authority. 4. Aerial inspection/photography of residential/commercial utility 

infrastructure. 5. Aerial video/photography or providing live video feed to assist with search and rescue 

operations in cases of an emergency or natural disaster only when the local authorities or government 

has requested it by contract or donation.
-----Original Message----- 

From: fhalfordlcsw@aol.com [mailto:fhalfordlcsw@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:41 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

fern halford 

841 taft place 

new orleans, LA 70119
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, September 12, 1995 (113), Para 113.36 Reported Bills Sequentially Referred]
[Page 1329]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.113.36  reported bills sequentially referred

  Under clause 5 of rule X, bills and reports were delivered to the 
Clerk for printing, and bills referred as follows:

       H.R. 1670. Referred to the Committee on Small Business for 
     a period ending not later than September 12, 1995, for 
     consideration of such portions of sections 101(d) and 102(b) 
     of the bill as fall within the jurisdiction of that committee 
     pursuant to clause 1(o), rule X.
```
From: Fwpssnt@aol.com [mailto:Fwpssnt@aol.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:08 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: (no subject)

Don't waste money and resources on programs that fail time and time 

again

One of the most effective way to implement the new law (and one of the most cost effective) is to 

use outcome based practices instead of evident based practices. Evident based practices can be 

shooting some up with drugs and they shuffle around every day. The evidence says that it works 

because they don't get into trouble and are not a bother to society anymore but if it was out come 

then the person that can function as an individual with moderate supervision and live on their 

own, now that is successful outcomes. 

 

The parity law has to address the funding resources and uses. 

 Unfortunately most resources goes for infrastructure and not provide help to the people that it is 

intended. In this way we have already reached parity. Wasteful spending is the norm for most 

programs. 

 

 In mental health there are fine lines between what works and what doesn't. So one shoe doesn't 

fit all and maybe one shoe only fits one, not very cost effective but that is the way the brain and 

ours bodies work. Now if the amount of funding was available for mental health that is available 

for medical health I believe that programs can be put together to help combat a lot of the poor 

perceptions of the " Mentally Ill ". 

 

 Peer support programs work, not the ones that are run by agencies but that are run by peers. 

The conception is not new but it never really goes into effect because there are people in the 

Mental Health Departments around the country that want to control their piece of the pie. There 

are intelligent people who can run peer run programs with great success and in the long run save 

many county's money doing it. You don't have to have a MSW or Dr. after your name to know 

when you neighbor is having a problem. What you do need a system in place that can come to 

the aid of that person before it gets into the crises mode. A nation wide Peer Support Program 

to come to the aid of those that might just need a friend to talk to. A program that can visit the jails 

to help people with mental health issues get the resources that they need when they are 

released. Does it work, heck yes it does. Just contact me and I'll show you people that have 

never gone back to jail again after being mentored before getting out. Its not easy but it is a very 

rewarding position to be in to help others that are in the same situation that I might be in because 

of my mental health issues. 

 

FRANK A. WELCOME 

Peer Advocate 

250 Tradewinds 

San Jacinto, California 92583 

 

fwpssnt@aol.come

805-286-7012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Century Properties Fund XVIII 1998 First Quarter 10-QSB and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000704271
<NAME> CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XVIII
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998   
<CASH>                                           1,962
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      150
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          26,968
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,948)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,435   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         18,504     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         488    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,435    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,218    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,084    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 368    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       134     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.61<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
§ 232.715 Double heading and helper service. ( a ) When more than one locomotive is attached to a train, the engineman of the leading locomotive shall operate the brakes. On all other motive power units in the train the brake pipe cutout cock to the brake valve must be closed, the maximum main reservoir pressure maintained and brake valve handles kept in the prescribed position. In case it becomes necessary for the leading locomotive to give up control of the train short of the destination of the train, a test of the brakes must be made to see that the brakes are operative from the automatic brake valve of the locomotive taking control of the train.
( b ) The electro-pneumatic brake valve on all motive power units other than that which is handling the train must be cut out, handle of brake valve kept in the prescribed position, and air compressors kept running if practicable.
### Request for Information Drone View Imaging LLC (FAA-2015-3887) 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA)

Dear Mr. Arrowood: This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

− 2015

− 3887). This information is necessary for the Fede ral Aviation Administrati on (FAA) to process your p etition.

x Your petition references the material (s) listed below, however the materi al(s) was/were not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of th e following referenced materials: { Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM). Please submit the additional informati on (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov . Once your information has been submitted, plea se also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comm ent tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. I f you want us to process your request any further, we mu st receive the information de scribed above by January 6, 2016. If we do not receive the information, we willclose the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions, please feelfree to contact me at (202) 267-2999. FAA Office o f Rulemakin g Sent : Wednesday , December 23, 2015 7:10 AM To: arrowood@frutkinlaw.com
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 27, 1995 (121), Para 121.15 Teamwork for Employers and Managers]
[Page 1454]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.121.15  teamwork for employers and managers

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, pursuant to House Resolution 226 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the consideration of the bill 
(H.R. 743) to amend the National Labor Relations Act to allow labor 
management cooperative efforts that improve economic competitiveness in 
the United States to continue to thrive, and for other purposes.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, by unanimous consent, designated 
Mr. KOLBE as Chairman of the Committee of the Whole; and after some time 
spent therein,
  After some further time,
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Biovest International, Inc. (the
Company) for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Steven R. Arikian, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and

(2)
The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 14, 2007



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Steven R. Arikian                                   
|Steven R. Arikian, M.D.                                 
|Chief Executive Officer; Chairman of the Board; Director

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the
date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, October 12, 1995 (127), Para 127.6 Unfinished Business--Veto of H.R. 1854]
[Page 1507]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.127.6  unfinished business--veto of h.r. 1854

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaTOURETTE, announced the unfinished 
business to be the further consideration of the veto of the bill (H.R. 
1854) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes.
  On motion of Mr. PACKARD, by unanimous consent, the bill was referred 
to the Committee on Appropriations.
```
#### The American Manufacturing Company, Appellant, *v.*The City of New York et al., Respondents.

*American Manfg. Co.*v. *City of New York,*132 App. Div. 900, affirmed.

(Argued January 11, 1911;

decided January 27, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered *595April 27, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to restrain the defendants from placing a meter on their fire extinguishing plant where it connects with the city water mains.

*Thomas F. Magner*for appellant.

*Archibald R.*Watson, *Corporation Counsel (James D. Bell*of counsel), for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.