alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 230.30 Lap-joint seam boilers.

Every boiler having lap-joint longitudinal seams without reinforcing plates shall have sufficient lagging, jacketing, flues, and tubes removed at every annual inspection so that an inspection of the entire joint, inside and out, can be made, taking special care to detect grooving or cracks at the edges of the seams.
Filed 6/2/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court 

### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2020 ND 111 Aparna Thiel, Plai ntiff and Appellee

v. Kyle Thiel, Defend ant and Appellant

No. 20200002 Appeal from the District Court of Bu rleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gail Hagerty, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Theresa L. Kellington, Bismarck, N. D., for plaintiff and appellee. Rodney E. Pagel, Bismarck, N. D., for defendant and appellant.1 Thiel v. Thiel No. 20200002 Per Curiam. [¶1] Kyle Thiel appeals from district co urt orders entered in August and September 2019 denying his motions for co ntinuance and for appointment of a parenting investigator, and from a di vorce judgment entered in November 2019. He argues that the district court erred in failing to grant his motions for continuance to allow him to retain sub stitute trial counsel; erred in failing to grant his motions for appo intment of a parenting i nvestigator; and erred and violated his due process rights by maki ng various evidentiary and procedural rulings at trial. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion, we summarily affirm under N. D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Jerod E. Tufte Gerald W. VandeWalle Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers
**BF** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0176 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. NATALIE AMANDA RICH ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including June 26 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief .

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court May 25 2021

05/25/2021
From: Scott Horvath [mailto:horvatsa@gmail.com] 

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 3:35 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210 - AB32

I see no reason to fight the fiduciary standard other than profits for advisors and investment 

companies. I work with a financial advisor with high ethics who always provides advice in my 

family's best interest, not anyone else's.

Conflicts of interest and commissions compromise advice. My accounts are fee-based and I 

know I am receiving the best advice I can.

Please do not alter the fiduciary standard to standards that are less than are what in a client's best 

interest.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, September 19, 1995 (117), Para 117.19 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1378]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.117.19  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. GREEN:

       Strike title V of the bill and insert the following:

                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

     SEC. 501. EFFECT ON REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973.

       Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, this Act 
     does not have any legal effect on any program under the 
     Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

It was decided in the

Yeas

231

affirmative

Nays

192
```
§ 1540.103 Fraud and intentional falsification of records. No person may make, or cause to be made, any of the following: ( a ) Any fraudulent or intentionally false statement in any application for any security program, access medium, or identification medium, or any amendment thereto, under this subchapter.
( b ) Any fraudulent or intentionally false entry in any record or report that is kept, made, or used to show compliance with this subchapter, or exercise any privileges under this subchapter.
( c ) Any reproduction or alteration, for fraudulent purpose, of any report, record, security program, access medium, or identification medium issued under this subchapter.
-----Original Message----- 

From: annitas@sbcglobal.net [mailto:annitas@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:58 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Annita Sawyer 

72 Crossfield rd. 

North Branford, CT 06471
-----Original Message----- 

From: brandonparcell@hotmail.com [mailto:brandonparcell@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:36 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

brandon parcell 

884 adobe flat dr 

henderson, NV 89011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          58,178
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              66
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    263,255
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        907,229
<ALLOWANCE>                                     14,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,276,645
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,074,314
<SHORT-TERM>                                    53,387
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              9,140
<LONG-TERM>                                     12,175
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,887
<OTHER-SE>                                     110,567
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,276,645
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 61,027
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               11,482
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   692
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                73,201
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              27,687
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,977
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           42,224
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,600
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  11
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 34,954
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,434
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      18,434
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,117
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.51
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.94
<LOANS-NON>                                      8,944
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,690
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   166
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                14,761
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,520
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,352
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               14,193
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            14,193
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Docket: CMS-2009-0040 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: CMS-2009-0040-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: CMS-2009-0040-0007 

OK-University of Tulsa 

Submitter Information 

Name: Tom J. Brian 

Address: 

Tulsa, OK, 74012 

Organization: University of Tulsa 

General Comment 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the implementation of a bill that has 

potential to improve mental health care in the United States. 

While the bill has good intentionsDepending on how it is implemented this bill 

could easily be more of a benefit for treatment providers and gold mine for 

pharmaceutical interests and at the expense of those it is supposed to serve. 

There needs to be some very effective regulation of the types of services 

reimbursed, specifically those treatments conclusively shown in valid research to 

have low risk of harm and higher likelihood than chance of benefitting clientele. 

A "gold standard" for this is the American Psychological Association's Task Force 

on Empirically Validted Treatments, which used valid criteria for research 

methodology (see http://www.apa.org/divisions/div12/est/newrpt.pdf). This stands 

in contrast to pseudo-science* "research" which is all too popular among mental 

health treatment providers but harmful or ineffective beyond "snake oil" levels. 

Please don't allow health care dollars to be mispent on charisma and snake oil at 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION 

As of: May 12, 2009 

Received: May 07, 2009 

Status: Posted 

Posted: May 11, 2009 

Category: Health Care Professional/Association - Other Practitione

Tracking No. 8097c479 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009 

Submission Type: Web
the expense of the clientele they are supposed to serve. 

Dr. Tom J. Brian, Director 

Counseling & Psychological Services 

Licensed Psychologist 

Adjunct Associate Professor of Psychology 

Clinical Practicum Coordinator 

University of Tulsa 

800 S. Tucker Dr. 

Tulsa, OK 74104 

thomas-brian@utulsa.edu 

Phone: 918-631-2200 

FAX: 918-631-2078 

*For example, see Lilenfeld, S. etal (2004). Science and pseudoscience in 

clinical psychology. New York: Guilford.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 124 (Thursday, June 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 35508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3140]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NM-952-07-1420-BJ]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; New Mexico

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plats of survey described below are scheduled to be 
officially filed in the New Mexico State Office, Bureau of Land 
Management, Santa Fe, New Mexico, (30) thirty calendar days from the 
date of this publication.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

New Mexico Principal Meridian, New Mexico

    The plat representing the dependent resurvey and survey for 
townships 9 and 10 North, Range 14 East, accepted June 20, 2007, for 
Group 1062 New Mexico.
    If a protest against a survey, as shown on any of the above plats 
is received prior to the date of official filing, the filing will be 
stayed pending consideration of the protest. A plat will not be 
officially filed until the day after all protests have been dismissed.
    A person or party who wished to protest against this survey must 
file a written protest with the New Mexico State Director, Bureau of 
Land Management, stating that they wish to protest.
    A statement of reasons for a protest may be filed with the notice 
of protest to the State Director, or the statement of reasons must be 
filed with the State Director within thirty days after the protest is 
filed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: This plat will be available for 
inspection in the New Mexico State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 
and P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87502-0115. Copies may be 
obtained from this office upon payment of $1.10 per sheet.

    Dated: June 21, 2007.
Stephen W. Beyerlein,
Acting Chief Cadastral Surveyor, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 07-3140 Filed 6-27-7; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
#### § 207.1 Application.

This part applies to all railroads as defined in 49 U.S.C. 20103.

[81 FR 88132, Dec. 7, 2016]
#### § 236.781 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Systems
     Assurance   Corporation  January  31,  1997  financial  statements  and  is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000705581
<NAME>                        SYSTEMS ASSURANCE CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                         698
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,140
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          53,099
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,988
<OTHER-SE>                                     (54,947)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,140
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
        


</TABLE>
#### § 196.209 May other civil enforcement actions be taken?

Whenever the Associate Administrator has reason to believe that a person has engaged, is engaged, or is about to engage in any act or practice constituting a violation of any provision of 49 U.S.C. 60101 *et seq.,* or any regulations issued thereunder, PHMSA, or the person to whom the authority has been delegated, may request the Attorney General to bring an action in the appropriate U.S. District Court for such relief as is necessary or appropriate, including mandatory or prohibitive injunctive relief, interim equitable relief, civil penalties, and punitive damages as provided under 49 U.S.C. 60120.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 20, 1995 (83), Para 83.19 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1018]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.83.19  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. NADLER:

       On Page 2, line 12, insert ``(less $10,000,000)'' before 
     ``, to remain''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

100

negative

Nays

329
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: dj@milltownlofts.com [mailto:dj@milltownlofts.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 12:03 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Doug Jervey 

791 Wylie St. SE #307 

Atlanta, GA 30316
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 17, 1995 (129), Para 129.36 Time Limitation of Referred Bill]
[Page 1534]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.129.36  time limitation of referred bill

  Pursuant to clause 5 of rule X the following action was taken by the 
Speaker:

                      [Submitted October 16, 1995]

       H.R. 1122. Referral to the Committee on Commerce extended 
     for a period ending not later than November 24, 1995.
       H.R. 2425. Referral to the Committees on the Judiciary and 
     Rules extended for a period ending not later than October 16, 
     1995.

                      [Submitted October 17, 1995]

       H.R. 1508. Referral to the Committee on Government Reform 
     and Oversight extended for a period ending not later than 
     October 17, 1995.
```
#### Sawyer *v.*Sawyer *& a.*

In a devise of real estate by a testator to his three daughters, a proviso “ that it shall require the consent of all, or of those who shall survive in the event of the decease of one, to sell or lease said real estate,” does not deprive the devisees of the right to have partition of the estate for'the purpose of occupation and enjoyment.

Bill in Equity, for partition of land, and for an accounting for rents, and profits, and waste. The bill alleges title to the land in the plaintiff and the defendants, under the will of their father, Joshua Sawyer. The defendants demur to the plaintiff’s alleged* right of partition, and answer denying the allegations of exclusion from possession, withholding of rents and profits and waste. The question raised by the demurrer is reserved.

*Batchelder Sf*Faulkner, for the defendants.

*F. II.*Woodward, for the plaintiff.

Clark, J.

Josiah Sawyer devised certain real estate, said to be his homestead, to his three daughters, the parties to this action, to share equally, to them and their respective heirs and assigns forever, subject to this restriction: “ provided, however, that no sale or leasing of the real estate shall be made without the joint action of all my daughters while living, and meaning that it shall *51be necessary for them to agree; and that it shall require the consent of all, or of those who shall survive in the event of the decease of one, to sell or lease said real estate.”

The only question raised by the demurrer is, whether the plaintiff is entitled to partition. The defendants object that partition cannot be had, claiming that the estate created by the devise is a joint estate for life, with several inheritances. 4 Kent 357. Without determining this question, and conceding for present purposes that the defendant’s contention as to the nature of the estate is correct, we think the plaintiff is entitled to partition. G. L., c. 247, *s.*1. The condition of the devise relates to the sale or leasing of the land, and not to its use, occupation, or enjoyment. There is nothing in the language of the proviso indicating an intention on the part of the testator to prohibit a division of the estate among the devisees for the purpose of enjoyment, or to restrict them to a use and occupation in common and undivided; and the plaintiff is entitled to partition.

*Demurrer overruled.*

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         500,491
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  633,496
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,831
<INVENTORY>                                    170,475
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,600,945
<PP&E>                                       1,644,991
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,419,651
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          402,125
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,922,705
<OTHER-SE>                                    (838,862)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,419,651
<SALES>                                      1,356,142
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,356,142
<CGS>                                          147,935
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  879,489
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,012
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                313,214
<INCOME-TAX>                                   125,137
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            188,077
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   188,077
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        


</TABLE>
§ 23.23 What administrative provisions must be in a recipient's ACDBE program? ( a ) If, as a recipient that must have an ACDBE program, the program must include provisions for a policy statement, liaison officer, and directory, as provided in part 26, §§ 26.23, 26.25, and 26.31, as well as certification of ACDBEs as provided by Subpart C of this part. You must include a statement in your program committing you to operating your ACDBE program in a nondiscriminatory manner.
( b ) You may combine your provisions for implementing these requirements under this part and part 26 (*e.g.*, a single policy statement can cover both Federally-assisted airport contracts and concessions; the same individual can act as the liaison officer for both part 23 and part 26 matters).
( c ) You must thoroughly investigate the full extent of services offered by financial institutions owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals in their community and make reasonable efforts to use these institutions. You must also encourage prime concessionaires to use such institutions.
[70 FR 14508, Mar. 22, 2005, as amended at 89 FR 24959, Apr. 9, 2024]