alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-'^--o

l-j j fr : O m .-^" S MAYO RCIT Y COUNCI L Chuc k Jorda nTomm y Benson , III , War d1 Loi s Hawkins , War d2 Caroly nWeathers , War d3 Bett y J . Watkins , War d4 An nHoll o well , War d5 Erric k D . Simmons , War d6 34 0 MainSt . • P . 0 . Bo

x 89 7 > GreenviUe , Mississipp i 3870 1 • Telephone : 662-378-150 1 • Facsimile : 662-378-027 6 • Email : cjordan@www.greenville.ms.u s February22 , 201 2 Mr . Denni s DeVan y Chief , EA S & Domesti cAnalysi s Divisio n Offic e o fAviatio n Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerseyAvenue , S.E . Washington , D

C 2059 0 ^ C D RE : Mi d Delt a Regiona l (GLH ) Docke t DOT-OST-2008-020 9

Mr . DeVany : W e hav e reviewe d th e EA S proposal s submitte d unde rDocke t DOT-OST-2008-0209 . W e hav e determine d tha t currently , al l bid s d o no t mee t th e statutor yrequirements . Additionally , th e propose d leve l o fservic e wil l b e a t a grea t disadvantag e fo ran yairlin e an d ou rairpor t withou t suppor t fro m Delt a Airlines , throug h som e for m o fcodeshar e an d join t ticke t pricing , allowin g passengers t o easil yflo wthroug h th e nationa l airport s system . W e appreciat e th e interes t o fthes e airlines , bu t d o no t endors e o rsuppor t thes e proposal s fo rsubsidize d essentia l ai r servic e t o th e communit yo fGreenville , MS . W e reques t tha t th e hold-i n orde rtha t prohibite d Mesab a & Pinnacl e Airline s db a Delt a Connectio n fro m terminatin g schedule d airlin e servic e t o GreenviUe , M S remai n i n effec t unti l furthe rnotice , o runti l suc h tim e a s a suitabl e replacemen t whic h satisfie s th e community' s need s ca n b e found . W e woul d lik e t o than k yo u i n advanc e fo ryou rcooperatio n an d assistanc e i n thi s matter . Respectfully ,

Mayo rChuc k

Jorda n Cit yo fGreenville , Mississipp i
#### In the Matter of the Application of the City of New York, Appellant, Relative to Acquiring Title to Lands Required for the Improvement of the Water Front on the East River. James E. Ward & Company, Respondent.

*Matter of City of New York,*138 App. Div. 186, affirmed.

(Argued September 29, 1910;

decided October 18, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 6, 1910, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming an award of commissioners of estimate and assessment.

*Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly*and *Charles D. Olendorf*of counsel), for appellant.

*Edmund L. Baylies*and *Edwin I). Bechtel*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, IIiscooic and Chase, JJ.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 29, 1995 (123), Para 123.39 Leave of Absence]
[Page 1492]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.123.39  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--
  To Mr. FROST, for today;
  To Mr. WALKER, for today;
  To Mr. McHUGH, for today;
  To Mr. TEJEDA, after 3 p.m. September 28 and balance of the week; and
  To Mrs. COLLINS of Illinois, for today.
  And then,
```
§ 215.3 Application. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, this part applies to each railroad freight car in service on: ( 1 ) Standard gage track of a railroad; or
( 2 ) Any other standard gage track while the car is being operated by, or is otherwise under the control of, a railroad.
( b ) Sections 215.15 and 215.303 of this part do not apply to any car: ( 1 ) Owned by a Canadian or Mexican Railroad; and
( 2 ) Having a Canadian or Mexican reporting mark and car number.
( c ) This part does not apply to a railroad freight car that is: ( 1 ) Operated solely on track inside an industrial or other non-railroad installation; or
( 2 ) Used exclusively in dedicated service as defined in § 215.5(d) of this part; or
( 3 ) Maintenance-of-way equipment (including self-propelled maintenance-of-way equipment) if that equipment is not used in revenue service and is stenciled in accordance with § 215.305 of this part.
( 4 ) Operated in a passenger train and that is inspected, tested, maintained, and operated pursuant to the requirements contained in part 238 of this chapter.
[44 FR 77340, Dec. 31, 1979, as amended at 65 FR 41305, July 3, 2000]
-----Original Message----- 

From: oneeyeblind@aol.com [mailto:oneeyeblind@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:04 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Michael Smith 

904 S. Hilda St. 

Anaheim, CA 92806
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0695 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Randy Neblett 

Address: 

3487 Courtyard Circle 

Dallas, TX, 75234 

Email: randy@nebletthome.com 

General Comment 

I have been a mental health practitioner for 20 years, with a specialization in the physical 

rehabilitation of chronic pain disorders. I have seen first hand, with thousands of patients, that 

mental health and physical health are intimately connected. Most chronic pain patients do not get 

better without out addressing the mental health component of their physical disability. 

Cognitive/behavioral treatments, including biofeedback training, are particularly effective for 

helping chronic pain patients learn increased mental control over physical symptoms, resulting in 

decreased disability and increased function. I strongly support this parity act. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: May 03, 2010 

Received: May 03, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ae5a20 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 5/3/2010
# U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t o f A pp e a l s For the Eig hth Circu it

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ No . 1 9 -2 3 98

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Gwen G. Caran ch i ni
ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l Pl a in t i

f f - Ap p el l an t

v
. Ri ckPeck , i n d i v id u al l y
l l l l l l l l l ll l l l l l l l l l lDef

en da n t - Ap

p el l ee

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Ap p eal fro m

Un i t edSt at es Di s t ri ct Co u rt fo r t h e W es t ern Di s t ri ct o f M i s s o u ri - Kan s as Ci t y

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Su b m i t t ed : Decem

b er 3 0 , 2 01 9 Fi l ed : J an u ary

7 , 2 0 2 0 [Un pu b l is h ed ]

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ Befo re LOKEN, SHEPHERD, an d ERICKSON, Ci rcu i t J ud g es
.

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ PER CURIAM

.

In t h i s di v ers i t y act i on , G wen Caran ch i n i a ppe a l s fo l l o w i n g t h e d i s t ri ct co u rt ’ s 1 d i s m i s s al o f h er co m

p l ai nt fo r fai l i n g t o s t at e a cl ai m , ch al l en g i n g o n l y t h e d en i al o f

1 Th e Ho n o rab l e Greg Kay s , Un i t ed St at es D i s t ri ct J ud g e fo r t h e W es t e r n Di s t ri ct o f M i s s o u ri

.h er m o t i on s t o recu s e. Aft er c a r efu l rev i ew o f th e reco rd , w e co ncl u d e t h at t h e

d i s t ri ct co u rt d i d n o t a b u s e i t s d i s cret io n i n d en y i ng Caran ch i ni ’ s m o t i o n s
. See J en k in s v
. Ark

. Po wer & Li g h t Co ., 1 4 0 F.3 d 1 1 6 1 , 1 16 4 (8 t h Ci r. 1 9 9 8 ) (d en i al o f

m o ti o n t o recu s e i s rev i ewed fo r ab u s e o f d i s cret io n ); cf. Un i t ed St at es v
. M el t o n , 7 3 8 F.3 d 9 0 3, 90 5-0 6 (8 t h Ci r. 2 0 13 ) (p art y s eek i n g re cu s al b ears b u rd en o f reb u t t i n g p res u m p t i o n t h a t ju d g e is i m

p art ial ; ju d ici al ru l i n g s rarel y es t ab l i s h v al i d b as i s fo r
recu s al , an d t h i s g en eral ru l e h o l d s t ru e wh ere p art y s eek i n g recu s al fai l s t o p res en t
ev i d en ce d em o n st rat i n g p art i al i t y ). Acco rd i n g l y , we affi rm . See 8 th Ci r. R. 4 7 B.

__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _

-2

-
Headquarters Washington, DC 20546

- 0001

Reply to Attn of: DK 18 November 2015

Dr. Paul Lawson

SPEC Inc. 3022 Sterling Circle

– Ste 200 Boulder, CO 80301

Dear Paul,

I understand you are requesting a Stag e 3 Noise Restrictions waiver from the FAA so your company can maintain its Learjet model 25 research aircraft in the Restricted Category. Based on your communication with me, the other options are to install hush kits or place the Lear in the Experimenta l category, but these are not practical courses of action due to operational limitations and insurance liability.

The purpose of this letter is to emphasize the importance of contribution s the SPEC Learjet has made to NASA field campaigns. An example i s the “ Studies of Emissions and Atmospheric Composition, Clouds and Climate Coupling by Regional Surveys ” ( SEAC 4 RS ) field campaign conducted in 2013. The SEAC 4 RS field campaign involved over 100 scientists from 23 research institutions, the NASA ER

- 2 (U

- 2 ) and DC

- 8 research aircraft, and the SPEC Learjet. (see https://espo.nasa.gov/missions/seac4rs/mission

- gallery/subject/aircraft )

The SPEC Lear has been operating in its research mode for the past 17 years and makes vital contributions to our understanding of weather and climate change. During

SEAC 4 RS the Lear performed the critical task of collecting data in rapidly developing convective clouds, a flight profile t hat requires the performance and structural integrity of an aircraft like the Learjet. As you are aware, it is very challenging to fund the development and certification of a new research aircraft. Therefore it is extremely unlikely that the SPEC Learjet could be replaced if it were lost to the scientific community.

Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

Sincerely,

Hal Maring, Ph.D. Program Manager NASA Radiation Sciences Program National Aeronautics and Space Administration
CSC 09.27.2013 Q2 10-Q EX 10.3






Exhibit 10.3




FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN


This AMENDMENT to the Computer Sciences Corporation Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) is effective as of December 31, 2012.


W I T N E S S E T H:


WHEREAS, the board of directors of Computer Sciences Corporation (the “Company”) has previously approved certain amendments to the Plan;


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


1.Article XXIII, paragraph (f) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety as follows:


(f)    Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary: no distributions to a Specified Employee (as hereinafter defined) under Part B of this Supplemental Plan that are to be made as a result of the Specified Employee’s Separation from Service for any reason other than the Specified Employee’s death or “disability” (as such term is defined under Section 409A) shall be made or commence prior to the date that is the earlier of six months after the date of Separation from Service or the date of the Participant’s death, or such shorter period that, in the opinion of such counsel, is sufficient to avoid the imposition of the additional tax under Section 409A(a)(1)(B) or any other taxes or penalties imposed under Section 409A (the “Section 409A Taxes”); provided that any distributions that otherwise would have been payable during such six-month (or shorter) period, plus interest accrued thereon at a rate equal to the default rate credited to amounts deferred under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended (but calculated on a monthly average basis rather than a daily basis), shall be distributed in lump sum on the first day following the expiration of such six-month (or shorter) period. For purposes of Part B of this Supplemental Plan the term “Specified Employee” shall mean any Plan B Participant who is a “specified employee” (as such term is defined under Section 409A) of the Company. Specified Employees shall be identified as provided in the Company’s Specified Employee Determination Policy, as amended.


		
	2.
	In all other respects, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be adopted as of the effective date indicated above.


COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION


By:     /s/ Eduardo J. Nunez                                            
Eduardo J. Nunez
Vice President, Global Compensation & Benefits
-----Original Message----- 

From: prfisher23@gmail.com [mailto:prfisher23@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:06 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Paul Fisher 

28 E Main St Apt A 

Reedsburg, WI 53959
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTheoretical study of the C-H bond dissociation energy of acetyleneThe authors present a theoretical study of the convergence of the C-H bond dissociation energy (D sub o) of acetylene with respect to both the one- and n-particle spaces. Their best estimate for D sub o of 130.1 plus or minus 1.0 kcal/mole is slightly below previous theoretical estimates, but substantially above the value determined using Stark anticrossing spectroscopy that is asserted to be an upper bound.Document ID19910006752Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsTaylor, Peter R.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Bauschlicher, Charles W., Jr.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Langhoff, Stephen R.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryChemistry And Materials (General)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:187858NASA-CR-187858Accession Number91N16065Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-371Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910006752.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
July 12, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EVERBANK, N.A., Appellant

NO. 14-15-00785-CV V.

SEEDERGY VENTURES, INC., Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed June 15, 2015 in favor of 

Seedergy Ventures, Inc., was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find that Seedergy Ventures, Inc. was not entitled to 

summary judgment on the grounds asserted in its motion for summary judgment. 

We further find that EverBank, N.A. is entitled to summary judgment because it 

conclusively established that it is the holder of the note. We therefore order the 

judgment of the court below REVERSED and RENDER judgment that Seedergy 

Ventures, Inc. take nothing by its claims against EverBank, N.A.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

Seedergy Ventures, Inc.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending August 25, 2012

|Filer                          | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------------ | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|AMERICAN BANCOR, LTD.          | * 3A3         | American Bancor, Ltd., Dickinson, North Dakota, to acquire 100 percent of North Country Bank, National Association, McClusky, North Dakota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:09/06/2012
|Newspaper:                     | Not available
|Federal Register:              | 09/06/2012   
|FRANDSEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION | * 3A3         | Frandsen Financial Corporation, Arden Hills, Minnesota, to acquire 100% of Clinton State Bank, Clinton, Minnesota.                          | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:09/07/2012
|Newspaper:                     | Not available
|Federal Register:              | 09/07/2012   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Forth Quarter of 2012 (October 1, 2012 - December 31, 2012)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 212.219 Apprentice MP&E inspector. ( a ) The apprentice MP&E inspector must be enrolled in a program of training prescribed by the Associate Administrator leading to qualification as an MP&E inspector. The apprentice may not participate in investigative and surveillance activities, except as an assistant to a qualified State or FRA inspector while accompanying that qualified inspector.
( b ) An apprentice MP&E inspector shall demonstrate basic knowledge of railroad equipment and air brake inspection, testing and maintenance, prior to being enrolled in the program.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 198 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 198

   To amend title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 to permit the 
       conversion of wetlands that are one acre or less in size.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Smith of Michigan (for himself, Mr. Hancock, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. 
   Baker of Louisiana, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Hayes, Mr. Stenholm, and Mr. 
   Dornan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 to permit the 
       conversion of wetlands that are one acre or less in size.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Down To Earth Tiny Wetland Act of 
1995.''

SEC. 2. CONVERSION OF WETLANDS THAT ARE ONE ACRE OR LESS IN SIZE.

    Section. 1222(b)(2) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 
3882(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (A);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (B) 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) a wetland that is one acre or less in size as 
                determined by the Secretary, except that the Secretary 
                shall make a reasonable effort to make an on-site 
                wetland inspection whenever requested by an owner or 
                operator.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Overseas Private Investment Corporation

# TIME AND DATE:

Thursday, January 18, 2007, 9:30 a.m. (Open Portion) 9:45 a.m. (Closed Portion).

# PLACE:

Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

Meeting Open to the Public from 9:30 a.m. to 9:45 a.m., Closed portion will commence at 9:45 a.m. (approx.)

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

1. President's Report.

2. Tribute—Collister Johnson.

3. Approval of September 21, 2006 Minutes (Open Portion).

# FURTHER MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

(Closed to the Public 10:15 a.m.)

1. Report from Audit Committee.

2. Auditor's Report to the Board.

3. Finance Project—Afghanistan.

4. Finance Project—Russia.

5. Finance Project—Jordan.

6. Finance Project—Global.

7. Finance Project—Global.

8. Finance Project—Latin America.

9. Finance Project—Jordan.

10. Finance Project—Lebanon/Jordan/Middle East.

11. Approval of September 21, 2006 Minutes (Closed Portion).

6. Pending Major Projects.

7. Reports.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION:

Information on the meeting may be obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438.

Dated: January 5, 2007.

Dev Jagadesan,

Deputy General Counsel, Overseas Private Investment Corporation.

[FR Doc. 07-41 Filed 1-5-07; 11:51 am]

BILLING CODE 3210-01-M