From:•Suchecki, Joe [JSuchecki@ngelaw.com]

Sent:•Wednesday, April 07, 2010 9:14 AM

To:•Tanya Parise

Subject:•RE: Stationary CI Engines 10-30 l/cyl

Hi Tanya,

Finally heard back from my members on this issue. We are still good with the 

8

engines per year. We would also say that the majority would be emergency 

engines -

so lets call it 5 emergency and 3 prime.

Also, I received a question on the CI NSPS form New York State - could you 

direct me

to the document in the docket that indicates that it is not cost effective to 

require DPFs

and SCR on emergency diesel engines? Hopefully, you know exactly where to 

find it.

- there's only a couple thousand documents to search through at Reg.gov.

Thanks.

Joe

Joe Suchecki

Director, Public Affairs

Engine Manufacturers Association

Two North LaSalle Street, Suite 1700

Chicago, IL 60602

Tel: 312-827-8734

Fax: 312-827-8737

jsuchecki@emamail.org

www.enginemanufacturers.org

Confidentiality Notice: This communication is confidential and may contain 

privileged information. If you have

received it in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and 

immediately delete it and any attachments without

copying or further transmitting the same.

All attachments are MS Office XP and are MIME encoded. If you have any 

software compatibility issues, please

contact EMA at (312) 827-8700 immediately.

From: Tanya Parise [mailto:parise.tanya@ecrweb.com]

Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 1:21 PM

To: Suchecki, Joe

Cc: 'Tanya Parise'

Subject: RE: Stationary CI Engines 10-30 l/cyl

Hi Joe,

I was wondering if you’ve gotten any feedback from members yet on the below 

questions that you

could share with us?

Tanya

From: Tanya Parise [mailto:parise.tanya@ecrweb.com]

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 4:30 PM

To: 'Suchecki, Joe'

Subject: RE: Stationary CI Engines 10-30 l/cyl

Thanks Joe. What does EMA estimate that the split of emergency/non-emergency 

engines would be

in this displacement range?

Also, do you think that 8 new engines per year is still reasonable or would 

it be higher or lower? I

believe you provided the 8 engines/yr estimate back in 2005.

Tanya

From: Suchecki, Joe [mailto:JSuchecki@ngelaw.com]

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 1:46 PM

To: Tanya Parise

Subject: RE: Stationary CI Engines 10-30 l/cyl
Tanya,

The primary use of these large engines is in electricity production, either 

in remote

areas such as Alaska or for emergency standby engines for nuclear power 

plants or

other very large facilities. One member also indicated that engines of this 

size are

used to power emergency flood water pumps.

Joe

Joe Suchecki

Director, Public Affairs

Engine Manufacturers Association

Two North LaSalle Street, Suite 1700

Chicago, IL 60602

Tel: 312-827-8734

Fax: 312-827-8737

jsuchecki@emamail.org

www.enginemanufacturers.org

Confidentiality Notice: This communication is confidential and may contain 

privileged information. If you have

received it in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and 

immediately delete it and any attachments without

copying or further transmitting the same.

All attachments are MS Office XP and are MIME encoded. If you have any 

software compatibility issues, please

contact EMA at (312) 827-8700 immediately.

From: Tanya Parise [mailto:parise.tanya@ecrweb.com]

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 11:16 AM

To: Suchecki, Joe

Subject: Stationary CI Engines 10-30 l/cyl

Hi Joe,

I’ve got a question related to stationary CI engines between 10-30 liters per 

cylinder. I think EMA

provided some information some time ago on the number of stationary CI 

engines in this

displacement range that are expected to be sold per year. EMA had estimated 

8 engines per year I

believe. Do you know which industries use these engines and what 

applications these engines are

used for?

Thanks,

Tanya