alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: d.fexis@myfairpoint.net [mailto:d.fexis@myfairpoint.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:01 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Deborah Fexis 

11 Laredo Circle 

Nashua, NH 03062
#### § 231.18 Cars of special construction.

Cars of construction not covered specifically in the foregoing sections in this part, relative to handholds, sill steps, ladders, hand brakes and running boards may be considered as of special construction, but shall have, as nearly as possible, the same complement of handholds, sill steps, ladders, hand brakes, and running boards as are required for cars of the nearest approximate type.
-----Original Message----- 

From: mind73@verizon.net [mailto:mind73@verizon.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:56 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jeanine Mindrum 

24 Ruggles Street #2 

Westborough, MA 01581
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF PAULSON CAPITAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY AS OF
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS,
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS IN THE PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1,000
       
<S>                                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                      61
<RECEIVABLES>                                            2,362
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                      1,435
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                        0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                      7,312
<PP&E>                                                     442
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          13,046
<SHORT-TERM>                                                 0
<PAYABLES>                                               2,287
<REPOS-SOLD>                                                 0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                          0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                          90
<LONG-TERM>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                   773
<OTHER-SE>                                               9,895
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            13,046
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                          254
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                                         5
<COMMISSIONS>                                            7,902
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                              944
<FEE-REVENUE>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           3
<COMPENSATION>                                           6,919
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (2,807)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                             (2,807)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (2,807)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (.73)
        


</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: kirtley thornton [mailto:ket@chp-neurotherapy.com] 

Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 9:47 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Neurotherapy coverage 

I am a licensed clinical psychologist in the state of New Jersey who 

provides neurofeedback treatment to individuals with Attention Deficit 

Hyperactivity Disorder, Learning disabilities and traumatic brain 

injury. There have been numerous studies on the positive effects of 

Neurofeedback on these conditions. You can go to our website 

chp-neurotherapy for a description of what is involved and some 

references with respect to ADD, LD and TBI. Neurofeedback is an 

empirically validated and widely recognized effective non-medication 

treatment for ADHD, as well as other conditions. A recent review of this 

literature concluded "Neurofeedback meets the American Academy of Child 

and Adolescent Psychiatry criteria for Clinical Guidelines for treatment 

of ADHD." This means that neurofeedback meets the same criteria as 

medication for treating ADHD, of which 60% of prescriptions are in fact 

prescribed "off label," and that neurofeedback "should always be 

considered as an intervention for this disorder by the clinician." 

This service has been denied by almost all insurance companies such as 

Aetna, United Behavioral Health, Blue Cross, Cigna, Horizon 

The reasons given by the insurance companies for this denial generally 

fall into two categories: 1) our company does not cover biofeedback for 

mental health problems, attention deficit disorder or learning problems 

or 2) it is an experimental procedure. The insurance companies are not 

aware of the research and have not read the material I have sent them 

regarding the effectiveness of this intervention. There are many 

routine medical and surgical procedures which have far fewer controlled 

studies about their efficacy than does neurofeedback. There should be 

parity between medical/surgical procedures and mental health procedures. 

The insurance plans are more restrictive in how they review 

evidenced-based mental health and Substance Abuse Treatments when 

compared to medical surgical treatments. This violates both the intent 

and letter of the parity statute and we hope that the regulations will 

clarify that this can't continue. 

Sincerely; 

Kirtley Thornton, PhD
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 149 (Friday, August 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 43288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3778]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel, Conference Grant 
Review.
    Date: August 9, 2007.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., 
Bethesda, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Melissa Stick, PhD, MPH Chief, Scientific Review 
Branch, Division of Extramural Activities NIDCD/NIH, 6120 Executive 
Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-8683.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting to the time limitations imposed by the review and funding 
cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deadness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: July 27, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-3778 Filed 8-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
-----Original Message----- 

From: kaw116@pitt.edu [mailto:kaw116@pitt.edu] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 8:47 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kimberly Wolff 

1874 George Cir 

Irwin, PA 15642
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2229 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2229

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into agreements for 
 the use of facilities associated with the Solano Project, California, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 4, 1995

   Mr. Miller of California introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into agreements for 
 the use of facilities associated with the Solano Project, California, 
                        and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF THE WARREN ACT.

    (a) Authority.--The Secretary of the Interior may--
            (1) enter into contracts with private entities pursuant to 
        the Act of February 21, 1911 (commonly known as the ``Warren 
        Act'') (36 Stat. 925 et seq., chapter 141; 43 U.S.C. 523 et 
        seq.), for the impounding, storage, and carriage of nonproject 
        water for domestic, municipal, fish and wildlife, industrial, 
        and other beneficial purposes, using any facilities associated 
        with the Solano Project, California; and
            (2) enter into agreements, under terms and conditions 
        authorized for contracts under such Act, with appropriate 
        officials of other Federal agencies, municipalities, public 
        water districts and agencies, and the State of California for 
        impounding, storage, and carriage of nonproject water for 
        purposes described in paragraph (1) using facilities referred 
        to in such paragraph.
    (b) Nonproject Water Defined.--In subsection (a), the term 
``nonproject water'' means water that is not from a Federal reclamation 
project.
                                 <all>
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: pballbach@comcast.net [mailto:pballbach@comcast.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 9:54 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Phil Ballbach 

2723 E. Lake Lansing Rd. 

East Lansing, MI 48823
-----Original Message----- 

From: valleygirllawyer@gmail.com [mailto:valleygirllawyer@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:30 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Stephanie Saxton 

8027 Moorcroft Ave 

Canoga Park, CA 91304
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending October 31, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 1, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-60867 Summary Calendar

EMILIO RIVERA-VEGA, Petitioner,

versus JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A42 343 100

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Emilio Rivera-Vega (Rivera) petitions this court for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming an order of the Immigration Judge (IJ) denying Rivera’s application for cancellation of removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a). Rivera concedes that the IJ’s decision was not based on non-discretionary statutory factors but solely on the IJ’s discretionary determination that relief was not warranted in Rivera’s case. See In re C-V-T , 22 I. & N. Dec. 7, 7 (BIA 1998);No. 03-60867 -2- Matter of Marin , 16 I. & N. Dec. 581, 584-85 (BIA 1978). Because the decision to cancel removal was subject to the discretion of the Attorney General, this court lacks jurisdiction to review the merits of Rivera’s petition. 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229b, 1252(a)(2)(B). Accordingly, the petition for review is
DISMISSED.
-----Original Message----- 

From: hanly@sbcglobal.net [mailto:hanly@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 3:58 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Heather Hanly 

4197 Opal St 

Oakland, CA 94609
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
        (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 30, 2006 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
        Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc., general
        partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., General Partner of the
        Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
  (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Registrant.
  /s/
        David Salzman
 David
        Salzman
 Chief
        Executive Officer of Richman
 Tax
        Credit Properties Inc., general
 partner
        of Richman Tax Credit Properties
 L.P.,
        General Partner of the Registrant
 March
        14,
        2008
§ 213.135 Switches. ( a ) Each stock rail must be securely seated in switch plates, but care shall be used to avoid canting the rail by overtightening the rail braces.
( b ) Each switch point shall fit its stock rail properly, with the switch stand in either of its closed positions to allow wheels to pass the switch point. Lateral and vertical movement of a stock rail in the switch plates or of a switch plate on a tie shall not adversely affect the fit of the switch point to the stock rail. Broken or cracked switch point rails will be subject to the requirements of § 213.113, except that where remedial actions C, D, or E require the use of joint bars, and joint bars cannot be placed due to the physical configuration of the switch, remedial action B will govern, taking into account any added safety provided by the presence of reinforcing bars on the switch points.
( c ) Each switch shall be maintained so that the outer edge of the wheel tread cannot contact the gage side of the stock rail.
( d ) The heel of each switch rail shall be secure and the bolts in each heel shall be kept tight.
( e ) Each switch stand and connecting rod shall be securely fastened and operable without excessive lost motion.
( f ) Each throw lever shall be maintained so that it cannot be operated with the lock or keeper in place.
( g ) Each switch position indicator shall be clearly visible at all times.
( h ) Unusually chipped or worn switch points shall be repaired or replaced. Metal flow shall be removed to insure proper closure.
( i ) Tongue & Plain Mate switches, which by design exceed Class 1 and excepted track maximum gage limits, are permitted in Class 1 and excepted track.
**EXHIBIT 23(a)**

** **

** **

## CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-33098 and333-55656) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-10169, 33-26726, 33-38362, 33-44663,333-44364, 333-59692 and 333-59696) of Cleco Corporation of our report dated February20, 2004 relating to the financial statements and financial statementschedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New Orleans, Louisiana 

March 9, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Wenatchee-Okanogan Resource Advisory Committee will meet on Wednesday, August 29, and Monday, September 10 at the Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forest Headquarters Office, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, WA. These meetings will begin at 9 a.m. and continue until 3 p.m. On August 29, 2007, committee members will review Okanogan County and Yakima County projects, and on September 10, 2007 committee members will review Chelan County and Kittitas County projects for Resource Advisory Committee consideration under Title II of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000. All Wenatchee-Okanogan Resource Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are welcomed to attend. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Direct questions regarding this meeting to Paul Hart, Designated Federal Official, USDA, Wenatchee National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington 98801, (509) 664-9200. 

August 10, 2007. 

Paul Hart, 

Designated Federal Official, Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests.

[FR Doc. 07-4006 Filed 8-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M