alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 129 (Friday, July 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 40426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16196]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of Business Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Friday, July 12, 2013; 9:30 a.m. EST

PLACE: 1331 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Suite 1150, Washington, DC 20425.

MEETING AGENDA 
I. Approval of Agenda
II. Program Planning
     Approval of Final Draft of 2013 Statutory Enforcement 
Report
     Discussion re: Proposed Findings and Recommendations for 
the 2013 Statutory Enforcement Report
     Status Update on the Sex Trafficking: A Gender-Based 
Violation of Civil Rights Report
     Status Update on the Federal Civil Rights Engagement with 
Arab and Muslim American Communities Post 9/11 Report
III. Management and Operations
     Staff Director's report
     Chief of Regional Programs' report
IV. Approval of State Advisory Committee Appointment Slates
     Kentucky
     Maine
     New Hampshire
     New York
V. Adjourn Meeting

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact Pamela 
Dunston at (202) 376-8105 or at signlanguage@usccr.gov at least seven 
business days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

    Dated: July 1, 2013.
TinaLouise Martin,
Director of Management/Human Resources.
[FR Doc. 2013-16196 Filed 7-2-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
Request for Information Drone View Imaging LLC (FAA-2015-3887) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Arrowood: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. 

FAA−2015−3887). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your

petition.

x Your petition references the material(s) listed below, however the material(s) was/were not submitted for the

record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

{ Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by January 6, 2016.

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 7:10 AM 

To: arrowood@frutkinlaw.com
-----Original Message----- 

From: sbracamo@gmail.com [mailto:sbracamo@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:45 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Samuel Bracamonte 

13408 Rexford Street 

Blue Island, IL 60406
#### Robert Rogers, *Executor, etc., Respondent, v.*Augustus L. Case and *others,*Appellants.—

Judgment reversed, and will so construed as to pass the portion in dispute under general residuary clause; costs to all parties out of the fund. Opinions by

Barnard, P. J., and Dykman, J.
[Rockingham,

December, 1881.]

#### Toppan *v.*Eastern Railroad Co.

*Marston ¿- Bastman,*for the plaintiff.

*J. Batch,*for the defendants.

Case. Pacts found by a referee whose report for the plaintiff was based on the defendants’ negligence found as a fact.

*Judgment for the plaintiff.*

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
-----Original Message----- 

From: dawnannr@aol.com [mailto:dawnannr@aol.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 8:11 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. When mental illness is a biological illness, 

it should be treated exactly the same as any other biological illness. 

Sincerely, 

Dawn Ring 

33565 Baldwin Road 

Solon, OH 44139
-----Original Message----- 

From: odconsults@gmail.com [mailto:odconsults@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:15 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Eric Reed 

1520 Alice St. #306 

Oakland, CA 94612
**EXHIBIT    31.3**

 

> PRINCIPAL OPERATING OFFICER CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Toney K.    Adkins, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed    this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Champion Industries, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge,    this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of    the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with    respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge,    the financial statements, and other financial information included in this    report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results    of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods    presented in this report;

4.     The registrant's    other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining    disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)    and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

> a)    Designed such disclosure    controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures    to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period    in which this report is being prepared;b)    Evaluated the effectiveness    of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this    report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on    such evaluation; andc)     Disclosed in this    report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting    that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's    fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially    affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal    control over financial reporting;  and

5.     The registrant's  other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation  of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and  the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing  the equivalent functions):a)    All significant deficiencies    and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over    financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's    ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)    Any fraud, whether or    not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant    role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date:     February 2, 2005

/s/ Toney    K. Adkins
Toney K. AdkinsPresident    & Chief Operating Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Chesapeake Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the period ended January 2, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Chesapeake Corporation.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                   |  |  |  |                    
|---------------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------
|                                   |  |  |  | Date: March 4, 2005
|/s/ Thomas H. Johnson              |  |  |  |                    
|Thomas H. Johnson                  |  |  |  |                    
|Chairman & Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  |                    
|(Principal Executive Officer)      |  |  |  |                    



|                              |  |  |  |                    
|----------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------
|                              |  |  |  | Date: March 4, 2005
|/s/ Andrew J. Kohut           |  |  |  |                    
|Andrew J. Kohut               |  |  |  |                    
|President                     |  |  |  |                    
|(Principal Financial Officer) |  |  |  |                    



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Chesapeake Corporation and will be retained by Chesapeake Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# BASF ~2cm-os3/

The Chemical Company

March 9, 2011 Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M) EPA OPPT/TSCA section 4 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20460-0001 Re: 40 CFR 799.5087 Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 

## RECEIVED I I MAR ! n PN !2: 42 FEDEX 7968 4755 8369 

# ~mpH0npiuiWiiumi~iupiup~i

Application for Exemption From Testing Requirements 68187-76-8 Castor oil, sulfated, sodiumsalt Dear Sir/Madam, This letter serves as an Application for Exemption fromtesting requirements, in compliance with 40 CFR 790

.80-790 .82 and 40 CFR 799.5087
. Test Rule Identification : 40 CFR 799.5087 - Chemical testing requirements for second group of certain high production volume chemicals (HPV2) FirmSeeking Exemption: BASF Corporation 100 Campus Drive Florham Park, NJ 07932 Contact Person: Diane Pietrzyk Sr
. Product Regulations Specialist Product Regulatory COE 26701 Telegraph Rd
. Southfield, MI 48034 phone 248-948-2154 email diane.pietrzyk@basf .com Substance Identified for Exemption: Castor oil, sulfated, sodiumsalt CASRN : 68187-76-8 Basis for Exemption: Substance imported solely as part of various multi-component mixtures (<50 wt%)

.

BASF Corporation 100Campus Drive FlorhamPark, NJ 07932 Tel : (800) 526-1072 www .basf.com/usa 

## CONTAINS NOCBI Helping Make Products BetterTMBASF - Request for exemption 799 .5087 CAS 68187-76-8 March 9, 2011 Page 2 of 2

BASF Corporation understands that if this application is granted before the reimbursement period described in section 4(c)(3)(B) of TSCA expires, BASF Corporation must pay fair and equitable reimbursement to the person or persons who incurred or shared in the costs of complying with the requirement to submit data and upon whose data the granting of BASF Corporation's application was based
. Should you have questions or concerns, please contact the person noted as the contact above
. Sincerely, BASF Corporation

Diane M
. Pietrzyk Sr
. Product Regulations Specialist Product Regulatory COE



## .~r~~ a nINS NOCBI
#### § 223.1 Scope.

This part provides minimum requirements for glazing materials in order to protect railroad employees and railroad passengers from injury as a result of objects striking the windows of locomotives, caboose and passenger cars.

[44 FR 77352, Dec. 31, 1979]
March	26 th ,	2015 U.S.	Department	of	Transportation Docket	Management	System 1200	New	Jersey	Ave.,	SW Washington,	DC	20590

Dear	Sir	or	Madam

Attached please	find	Corvus	Eye	Productions,	LLC	(“Corvus	Eye”)	request	for	an exemption from	the	listed	Federal	Aviation	Regulations	to	allow	commercial operation	of	its	Small	Unmanned	Aircraft	Systems	(“sUASs”)	for	aerial	imaging	for safety,	real

- estate,	film	production,	and	monitoring	of	secured	and	controlled

environment	construction	site s.	This	exemption	request	is	for	the	use	of	both	the UAS	manufactured	by	Foxtech	FPV,	and	the	use	of	the	UAS	manufactured	by	DJI, both	China	based	companies.

Also	attached	to	this	letter	is	both	UAS	Flight	Manuals	(“Manual”),	which	outlines the	operating requirements,	limitations,	and	technical	specifications	for	both	the	DJI and	Foxtech	systems.	Corvus	Eye	has	reviewed	these	manuals	and	has	found	it	to	be acceptable	for sUAS	operations	on	its	projects	sights	and	film	sets.

Thank	you	for	your	time	and	co nsideration,	and	please	let	me	know	if	you	have	any questions.

Sincerely,

Jeremiah	Kaynor Corvus	Eye	Productions,	LLC

CEO
§ 214.313 Responsibility of individual roadway workers. ( a ) Each roadway worker is responsible for following the on-track safety rules of the railroad upon which the roadway worker is located.
( b ) A roadway worker shall not foul a track except when necessary for the performance of duty.
( c ) Each roadway worker is responsible to ascertain that on-track safety is being provided before fouling a track.
( d ) Each roadway worker may refuse any directive to violate an on-track safety rule, and shall inform the employer in accordance with § 214.311 whenever the roadway worker makes a good faith determination that on-track safety provisions to be applied at the job location do not comply with the rules of the operating railroad.
EXHIBIT 23.1



Consent of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.



We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 23, 
1997 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Chesapeake
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, which report is
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in the
following registration statements on Form S-8:

The Chesapeake Corporation of Virginia 1981 Stock Incentive Plan
(File No. 2-71595)
     Salaried Employees' Stock Purchase Plan (File No. 33-14926)
     Hourly Employees' Stock Purchase Plan (File No. 2-79636)
     Chesapeake Corporation 1987 Stock Option Plan (File No. 33-14925)
     Chesapeake Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan for Salaried Employees
       (File No. 33-14927)
     Chesapeake Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan for Hourly Employees
       (File No. 33-26150)
     Chesapeake Corporation Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan
     (File No. 33-53478)
     Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan for Hourly Employees
      (File No. 33-55558)
     Chesapeake Corporation 1993 Incentive Plan (File No. 33-67384)
     Chesapeake Packaging Co. 401(k) Savings Plan for Hourly Employees
      (File No. 33-56473)
     Chesapeake Corporation Stock Purchase Plan for Hourly Employees of
      Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc. (File No. 33-314189)

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 for the Hourly Employees' Stock Purchase Plan (File No. 2-79636) of
our report dated March 7, 1997 on our audits of the balance sheets of the
Hourly Employees' Stock Purchase Plan of Chesapeake Corporation and
participating subsidiaries as of November 30, 1996 and 1995, and the related
statements of changes in plan equity for each of the three fiscal years in
the period ended November 30, 1996, which report is included in the Annual
Report on Form 11-K (Exhibit 99.1).


                                        /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Richmond, Virginia
March 25, 1997
#### § 229.14 Non-MU control cab locomotives.

On each non-MU control cab locomotive, only those components added to the passenger car that enable it to serve as a lead locomotive, control the locomotive actually providing tractive power, and otherwise control the movement of the train, are subject to this part.
#### George H. ELLIOTT, Appellant, v. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORPORATION, a Corporation.

No. 12468.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Sept. 15, 1958.

Decided Oct. 1, 1958.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 21, 1958.

Dennis C. Harrington, Pittsburgh, Pa. (James P. McArdle, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Harland I. Casteel, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Campbell, Casteel & Thomas, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendant upon a directed verdict in an action brought following an accident to the master of a ship which he claims took place when he slipped on the floor of his cabin and sustained injuries. He alleges that the ship was negligent in the permitting of an unsafe condition to exist.

The district court, 166 F.Supp. 731, discussed all phases of the case satisfactorily. We have nothing to add to what has already been said as to its merits.

The judgment will be affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Brunner
Companies Income Properties L.P. I 1997 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in 
its entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000830737
<NAME> BRUNNER COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES L.P. I
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             333
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          25,044
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         18,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         909
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,507
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,860
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,961
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,684
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (101)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 214.513 Retrofitting of existing on-track roadway maintenance machines; general. ( a ) Each existing on-track roadway maintenance machine shall have a safe and secure position with handholds, handrails, or a secure seat or bench position for each roadway worker transported on the machine. Each position shall be protected from moving parts of the machine.
( b ) By March 28, 2005, each existing on-track roadway maintenance machine shall be equipped with a permanent or portable horn or other audible warning device that produces a sound loud enough to be heard by roadway workers and other machine operators within the immediate work area. The triggering mechanism for the device shall be clearly identifiable and within easy reach of the machine operator.
( c ) By March 28, 2005, each existing on-track roadway maintenance machine shall be equipped with a permanent illumination device or a portable light that is securely placed and not hand-held. The illumination device or portable light shall be capable of illuminating obstructions on the track ahead for a distance of 300 feet under normal weather and atmospheric conditions when the machine is operated during the period between one-half hour after sunset and one-half hour before sunrise or in dark areas such as tunnels.
[68 FR 44407, July 28, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 8839, Feb. 26, 2004]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paulson Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Chester L. F. Paulson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    Chester L. F. Paulson         
|Chester L. F. Paulson                
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|Paulson Capital Corp. August 12,
2009

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Paulson Capital Corp. and will be retained by Paulson Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.