alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: maj5034@yahoo.com [mailto:maj5034@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 3:11 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

Please pass the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici 

Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Martha Jones 

5034 SE Tolman 

Portland, OR 97206
1 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 95-4403

_______________________ D.C. Docket No. 94-6258-CIV-UUB CARL EUGENE WATTS, Petitioner-Appellee, versus HARRY K. SINGLETARY, Respondent-Appellant.

_______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

_______________________ (December 19, 1996) ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion July 18, 1996, 11th Cir., 87 F.3d 1282) Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, KRAVITCH, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule2 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.
BARKETT, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent from the order of the majority of the court in denying the petition of appellee Carl Watts for en banc rehearing. This case presents important issues which, for reasons stated in Judge Carnes’s dissent, were erroneously decided.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,068,102
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,920,949
<ALLOWANCES>                                   756,311
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,183,900
<PP&E>                                       9,665,496
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,437,238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,965,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,726,310
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              165
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,304
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,504,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,965,453
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,652,168
<CGS>                                       13,550,479
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,262,732
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               659,208
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             252,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,073,169)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,073,169)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,073,169)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 193
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

§ 193.2629 External corrosion control: buried or submerged components. ( a ) Each buried or submerged component that is subject to external corrosive attack must be protected from external corrosion by— ( 1 ) Material that has been designed and selected to resist the corrosive environment involved; or
( 2 ) The following means: ( i ) An external protective coating designed and installed to prevent corrosion attack and to meet the requirements of § 192.461 of this chapter; and
( ii ) A cathodic protection system designed to protect components in their entirety in accordance with the requirements of § 192.463 of this chapter and placed in operation before October 23, 1981, or within 1 year after the component is constructed or installed, whichever is later.
( b ) Where cathodic protection is applied, components that are electrically interconnected must be protected as a unit.
[Amdt. 193-2, 45 FR 70407, Oct. 23, 1980, as amended at 47 FR 32720, July 29, 1982]
§ 234.413 Recordkeeping. ( a ) Each railroad subject to this subpart shall keep records in accordance with this section. Records may be kept either on paper or by electronic means in a manner that conforms with § 234.415.
( b ) Each operating railroad, including the primary operating railroad, responsible for submitting information to the Crossing Inventory in accordance with this subpart shall, at a minimum, maintain the following information for each required Inventory Form: ( 1 ) A duplicate copy of each Inventory Form submitted in hard copy to the Crossing Inventory; or
( 2 ) A copy of the electronic confirmation received from FRA after electronic submission of crossing data to the Crossing Inventory.
( c ) Each railroad shall identify the locations where a copy of any record required to be retained by this subpart is accessible for inspection and photocopying by maintaining a list of such establishment locations at the office where the railroad's reporting officer conducts his or her official business.
( d ) Each operating railroad shall retain for at least four (4) years from the date of submission to the Crossing Inventory all records referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. Records required to be kept under this subpart shall be made available to FRA as provided by 49 U.S.C. 20107.
§ 209.325 Finality of decision. ( a ) The initial decision of the presiding officer shall become final 35 days after issuance. Such decisions are not precedent.
( b ) *Exception.* The initial decision shall not become final if, within 35 days after issuance of the decision, any party files an appeal under § 209.327. The timely filing of such an appeal shall stay the order in the initial decision.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

29–011 2012

112th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 112–159 

A REPORT ON THE SECURITY SITUATION IN THE 

CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

A LETTER REGARDING THE DETERIORATING SECURITY SITUATION 

IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC AND THE POTENTIAL 

THREAT TO U.S. CITIZENS, U.S. EMBASSY PERSONNEL AND SEVERAL PRIVATE U.S. CITIZENS THAT WERE EVACUATED FROM 

BANGUI, CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC ON DECEMBER 27, 2012 

AND A STAND-BY RESPONSE AND EVACUATION FORCE OF APPROXIMATELY 50 U.S. MILITARY PERSONNEL 

DECEMBER 30, 2012.—Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 

ordered to be printed 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with E:\Seals\Congress.#13

pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with 
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, December 29, 2012. 

Hon. JOHN BOEHNER, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Due to the deteriorating security situation 

in the Central African Republic and the potential threat to U.S. 

citizens, U.S. embassy personnel and several private U.S. citizens 

were evacuated from Bangui, Central African Republic on December 27, 2012. In addition, at approximately 5:20 p.m. Eastern 

Standard Time on December 27, a stand-by response and evacuation force of approximately 50 U.S. military personnel from U.S. 

Africa Command deployed to Chad to support the evacuation of 

U.S. embassy personnel and U.S. citizens from the Central African 

Republic. Although equipped for combat, this stand-by security 

force was deployed solely for the purpose of protecting U.S. citizens 

and property, if necessary, until the U.S. embassy personnel and 

private U.S. citizens have been safely evacuated from the Central 

African Republic. 

This action has been directed consistent with my responsibility 

to protect U.S. citizens both at home and abroad, and in furtherance of U.S. national security and foreign policy interests, pursuant 

to my constitutional authority to conduct U.S. foreign relations and 

as Commander in Chief and Chief Executive. 

I am providing this report as part of my efforts to keep the Congress fully informed, consistent with the War Powers Resolution 

(Public Law 93–148). I appreciate the support of the Congress in 

this action. 

Sincerely, 

BARACK OBAMA. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                     OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Bruce A. Klein, the Chief Financial Officer of CLARCOR Inc., certify that (i)
the Form 10-K Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Form 10-K Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CLARCOR Inc.

                                                  /s/ BRUCE A. KLEIN
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      Bruce A. Klein
                                              Vice President -- Finance and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8301

STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. R. DAVID MITCHELL, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:08-hc-02077-BO)

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stuart Wayne Tompkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Stuart Wayne Tompkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Tompkins has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the 

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the 

Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound 

volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 18-BS-475

IN RE ALEXANDER FERNANDEZ,

Respondent. Board Docket No. 18-BD-032

Bar Registration No. 477829 DDN: 312-17

BEFORE: Fisher and Beckwith, Associate Judges, and Farrell, Senior Judge.

O R D E R

(FILED – May 17, 2018)

On consideration of the affidavit of Alexander Fernandez, wherein he 

consents to disbarment from the bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of 

Rule XI of the Rules of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals Governing the 

District of Columbia Bar, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this 

court, and the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional 

Responsibility, it is this 17th day of May 2018,

ORDERED that the said Alexander Fernandez is hereby disbarred by 

consent, effective forthwith. The effective date of respondent’s disbarment shall 

run, for reinstatement purposes, from the date respondent files his affidavit 

pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14 (g). 

The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly 

disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the court or upon 

written consent of the respondent.

The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman 

of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving 

him notice of the provisions of Rule XI, §§ 14 and 16, which set forth certain 

rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure to comply 

therewith.

PER CURIAM

05/17/2018
From: choogendyk@earthlink.net [mailto:choogendyk@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:54 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Chris Hoogendyk 

59 Memorial Drive 

Amherst, MA 01002
§ 214.335 On-track safety procedures for roadway work groups, general. ( a ) No employer subject to the provisions of this part shall require or permit a roadway worker who is a member of a roadway work group to foul a track unless on-track safety is provided by either working limits, train approach warning, or definite train location in accordance with the applicable provisions of § 214.319, § 214.321, § 214.323, § 214.325, § 214.327, § 214.329, § 214.331, or § 214.336.
( b ) No roadway worker who is a member of a roadway work group shall foul a track without having been informed by the roadway worker in charge of the roadway work group that on-track safety is provided.
[81 FR 37889, June 12, 2016]
§ 178.33a-1 Compliance. ( a ) Required in all details.
( b ) [Reserved]
[Order 71, 31 FR 9074, July 1, 1966. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




         In connection with the Annual Report of Vista Continental Corporation.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30th, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Ashak Rustom, Accounting Principal of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                                                      /s/ Ashak Rustom
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Ashak Rustom
                                                      Accounting Principal
January 24, 2005
-----Original Message----- 

From: thomasgirvin@yahoo.com [mailto:thomasgirvin@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:43 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Thomas Girvin 

5296 Himes Lane 

Dayton, OH 45429
-----Original Message----- 

From: indenial49@comcast.net [mailto:indenial49@comcast.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 3:15 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kathleen McCann 

939 Devon Lane 

Lake Oswego, OR 97034
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.450 Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section and § 195.452: Emergency flow restricting device or EFRD means a check valve or remote control valve as follows: ( 1 ) *Check valve* means a valve that permits fluid to flow freely in one direction and contains a mechanism to automatically prevent flow in the other direction.
( 2 ) Remote control valve or RCV means any valve that is operated from a location remote from where the valve is installed. The RCV is usually operated by the supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system. The linkage between the pipeline control center and the RCV may be by fiber optics, microwave, telephone lines, or satellite.
*High consequence area* means: ( 1 ) A *commercially navigable waterway,* which means a waterway where a substantial likelihood of commercial navigation exists;
( 2 ) A *high population area,* which means an urbanized area, as defined and delineated by the Census Bureau, that contains 50,000 or more people and has a population density of at least 1,000 people per square mile;
( 3 ) An *other populated area,* which means a place, as defined and delineated by the Census Bureau, that contains a concentrated population, such as an incorporated or unincorporated city, town, village, or other designated residential or commercial area;
( 4 ) An *unusually sensitive area,* as defined in § 195.6.
[Amdt. 195-70, 65 FR 75405, Dec. 1, 2000]
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.212 Non-bulk packagings for solid hazardous materials in Packing Group II. ( a ) When § 172.101 of this subchapter specifies that a solid hazardous material be packaged under this section, only non-bulk packagings prescribed in this section may be used for its transportation. Each package must conform to the general packaging requirements of subpart B of part 173, to the requirements of part 178 of this subchapter at the Packing Group I or II performance level, and to the requirements of the special provisions of column 7 of the § 172.101 table.
( b ) The following combination packagings are authorized: *Outer packagings:* Steel drum: 1A1 or 1A2 Aluminum drum: 1B1 or 1B2 Metal drum other than steel or aluminum: 1N1 or 1N2 Plywood drum: 1D Fiber drum: 1G Plastic drum: 1H1 or 1H2 Wooden barrel: 2C2 Steel jerrican: 3A1 or 3A2 Plastic jerrican: 3H1 or 3H2 Aluminum jerrican: 3B1 or 3B2 Steel box: 4A Aluminum box: 4B Natural wood box: 4C1 or 4C2 Plywood box: 4D Reconstituted wood box: 4F Fiberboard box: 4G Solid plastic box: 4H2 Metal box other than steel or aluminum: 4N *Inner packagings:* Glass or earthenware receptacles Plastic receptacles Metal receptacles Glass ampoules
( c ) Except for transportation by passenger aircraft, the following single packagings are authorized:
Steel drum: 1A1 or 1A2 Aluminum drum: 1B1 or 1B2 Plywood drum: 1D Plastic drum: 1H1 or 1H2 Fiber drum: 1G Metal drum other than steel or aluminum: 1N1 or 1N2 Wooden barrel: 2C1 or 2C2 Steel jerrican: 3A1 or 3A2 Plastic jerrican: 3H1 or 3H2 Aluminum jerrican: 3B1 or 3B2 Steel box: 4A Steel box with liner: 4A Aluminum box: 4B Aluminum box with liner: 4B Metal box other than steel or aluminum: 4N Natural wood box: 4C1 Natural wood box, sift proof: 4C2 Plywood box: 4D Reconstituted wood box: 4F Fiberboard box: 4G Expanded plastic box: 4H1 Solid plastic box: 4H2 Bag, woven plastic: 5H1, 5H2 or 5H3 Bag, plastic film: 5H4 Bag, textile: 5L1, 5L2 or 5L3 Bag, paper, multiwall, water resistant: 5M2 Plastic receptacle in steel, aluminum, plywood, fiber or plastic drum: 6HA1, 6HB1, 6HD1, 6HG1 or 6HH1 Plastic receptacle in steel, aluminum, wood, plywood or fiberboard box: 6HA2, 6HB2, 6HC, 6HD2 or 6HG2 Glass, porcelain or stoneware in steel, aluminum, plywood or fiber drum: 6PA1, 6PB1, 6PD1 or 6PG1 Glass, porcelain or stoneware in steel, aluminum, wooden or fiberboard box: 6PA2, 6PB2, 6PC or 6PG2 Glass, porcelain or stoneware in expanded or solid plastic packaging: 6PH1 or 6PH2 Cylinders, as prescribed for any compressed gas, except for Specification 8 and 3HT
[Amdt. 173-224, 55 FR 52634, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended by Amdt. 173-241, 59 FR 67511, 67518, Dec. 29, 1994; Amdt. 173-261, 62 FR 24734, May 6, 1997; 69 FR 76157, Dec. 20, 2004; 70 FR 34398, June 14, 2005; 78 FR 1089, Jan. 7, 2013]
#### Bolton Hall and others, Respondents, v. The United States Reflector Company, Appellant.

Judgment reversed; new trial ordered; costs to abide event. Opinions by

Daniels, J., and by Davis, P. J.,

dissenting.