From: Gary Ames [mailto:GaryAmes@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 11:14 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: I love neurofeedback

The Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and the Treasury are inviting public comments 

through a Request for Information (RFI) regarding issues under the Wellstone - Domenici Mental Health 

Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008.You may have already seen the announcements from AAPB and 

BCIA requesting their members and certificants respond. 

The act, copied below, mandates insurance companies to consider neurofeedback as a viable treatment 

modality for specific mental health issues. Lines 3-10 through 3-17 (highlighted in red) are those pertinent 

to this important issue. 

ISNR also advocates for its members to respond to this. You can find an edited version of the letter that 

Lynda Kirk wrote below (thank you Lynda for your efforts and for making us aware of the issue). Or you 

can write your own letter. The more letters received, the louder will be our voice. The deadline for 

responses is May 28th (next Thursday). So please take the time to have our voice be heard. You can send 

your letter HERE. 

1-1 AN ACT 

1-2 relating to health benefit plan coverage for certain benefits 

1-3 related to brain injury. 

1-4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: 

1-5 SECTION 1. Subchapter E, Chapter 21, Insurance Code, is 

1-6 amended by adding Article 21.53Q to read as follows: 

1-7 Art. 21.53Q. HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN COVERAGE FOR CERTAIN 

1-8 BENEFITS RELATED TO BRAIN INJURY 

1-9 Sec. 1. APPLICABILITY OF ARTICLE. (a) This article 

1-10 applies only to a health benefit plan that provides benefits for 

1-11 medical or surgical expenses incurred as a result of a health 

1-12 condition, accident, or sickness, including an individual, group, 

1-13 blanket, or franchise insurance policy or insurance agreement, a 

1-14 group hospital service contract, or an individual or group evidence 

1-15 of coverage or similar coverage document that is offered by: 

1-16 (1) an insurance company; 

1-17 (2) a group hospital service corporation operating 

1-18 under Chapter 20 of this code; 

1-19 (3) a fraternal benefit society operating under 

1-20 Chapter 10 of this code; 

1-21 (4) a stipulated premium insurance company operating 

1-22 under Chapter 22 of this code; 

1-23 (5) a reciprocal exchange operating under Chapter 19 

1-24 of this code; 

2-1 (6) a Lloyd's plan operating under Chapter 18 of this 

2-2 code; 

2-3 (7) a health maintenance organization operating under 

2-4 the Texas Health Maintenance Organization Act (Chapter 20A, 

2-5 Vernon's Texas Insurance Code); 

2-6 (8) a multiple employer welfare arrangement that holds 

2-7 a certificate of authority under Article 3.95-2 of this code; or 

2-8 (9) an approved nonprofit health corporation that 

2-9 holds a certificate of authority under Article 21.52F of this code. 

2-10 (b) This article applies to a small employer health benefit 

2-11 plan written under Chapter 26 of this code. 

2-12 (c) This article does not apply to: 

2-13 (1) a plan that provides coverage: 
2-14 (A) only for benefits for a specified disease or 

2-15 for another limited benefit other than an accident policy; 

2-16 (B) only for accidental death or dismemberment; 

2-17 (C) for wages or payments in lieu of wages for a 

2-18 period during which an employee is absent from work because of 

2-19 sickness or injury; 

2-20 (D) as a supplement to a liability insurance 

2-21 policy; 

2-22 (E) for credit insurance; 

2-23 (F) only for dental or vision care; 

2-24 (G) only for hospital expenses; or 

2-25 (H) only for indemnity for hospital confinement; 

2-26 (2) a Medicare supplemental policy as defined by 

2-27 Section 1882(g)(1), Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. Section 1395ss), 

3-1 as amended; 

3-2 (3) a workers' compensation insurance policy; 

3-3 (4) medical payment insurance coverage provided under 

3-4 a motor vehicle insurance policy; or 

3-5 (5) a long-term care insurance policy, including a 

3-6 nursing home fixed indemnity policy, unless the commissioner 

3-7 determines that the policy provides benefit coverage so 

3-8 comprehensive that the policy is a health benefit plan as described 

3-9 by Subsection (a) of this section. 

3-10 Sec. 2. EXCLUSION OF COVERAGE PROHIBITED. (a) A health 

3-11 benefit plan may not exclude coverage for cognitive rehabilitation 

3-12 therapy, cognitive communication therapy, neurocognitive therapy 

3-13 and rehabilitation, neurobehavioral, neurophysiological, 

3-14 neuropsychological, and psychophysiological testing or treatment, 

3-15 neurofeedback therapy, remediation, post-acute transition services, 

3-16 or community reintegration services necessary as a result of and 

3-17 related to an acquired brain injury. 

3-18 (b) Coverage required under this article may be subject to 

3-19 deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, or annual or maximum payment 

3-20 limits that are consistent with deductibles, copayments, 

3-21 cosinsurance, and annual or maximum payment limits applicable to 

3-22 other similar coverage under the plan. 

3-23 (c) The commissioner shall adopt rules as necessary to 

3-24 implement this section. 

3-25 Sec. 3. TRAINING FOR CERTAIN PERSONNEL REQUIRED. (a) In 

3-26 this section, "preauthorization" means the provision of a reliable 

3-27 representation to a physician or health care provider of whether 

4-1 the issuer of a health benefit plan will pay the physician or 

4-2 provider for proposed medical or health care services if the 

4-3 physician or provider renders those services to the patient for 

4-4 whom the services are proposed. The term includes 

4-5 precertification, certification, recertification, or any other 

4-6 activity that involves providing a reliable representation by the 

4-7 issuer of a health benefit plan to a physician or health care 

4-8 provider. 

4-9 (b) The commissioner by rule shall require the issuer of a 

4-10 health benefit plan to provide adequate training to personnel 

4-11 responsible for preauthorization of coverage or utilization review 

4-12 under the plan to prevent wrongful denial of coverage required 

4-13 under this article and to avoid confusion of medical benefits with 

4-14 mental health benefits. 

4-15 SECTION 2. (a) On or before September 1, 2006, the Sunset 

4-16 Advisory Commission shall conduct a study to determine: 
4-17 (1) to what extent the health benefit plan coverage 

4-18 required by Article 21.53Q, Insurance Code, as added by this Act, 

4-19 is being used by enrollees in health benefit plans to which that 

4-20 article applies; and 

4-21 (2) the impact of the required coverage on the cost of 

4-22 those health benefit plans. 

4-23 (b) The Sunset Advisory Commission shall report its findings 

4-24 under this section to the legislature on or before January 1, 2007. 

4-25 (c) The Texas Department of Insurance and any other state 

4-26 agency shall cooperate with the Sunset Advisory Commission as 

4-27 necessary to implement this section. 

5-1 (d) This section expires September 1, 2007. 

5-2 SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2001, and 

5-3 applies only to a health benefit plan delivered, issued for 

5-4 delivery, or renewed on or after January 1, 2002. A health benefit 

5-5 plan delivered, issued for delivery, or renewed before January 1, 

5-6 2002, is governed by the law in effect immediately before the 

5-7 effective date of this Act, and that law is continued in effect for 

5-8 that purpose. 

_______________________________ _______________________________ 

President of the Senate Speaker of the House 

I certify that H.B. No. 1676 was passed by the House on April 

30, 2001, by a non-record vote. 

_______________________________ 

Chief Clerk of the House 

I certify that H.B. No. 1676 was passed by the Senate on May 

22, 2001, by a viva-voce vote. 

_______________________________ 

Secretary of the Senate 

APPROVED: __________________________ 

__________________________________________________________ 

Comments Regarding Regulatory Guidance USCG-2007-27022 

page 19157, II B specific areas 1 and 4 

I am a <input your profession> who provides neurofeedback treatment to individuals with Attention 

Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Mood Disorders. Neurofeedback is an empirically validated and widely 

recognized effective non-medication treatment for ADHD, as well as other conditions. There are over 50 

studies evaluating the effectiveness of neurofeedback in the treatment of ADHD, substance use disorders 

and Autism. A recent review of this literature concluded "Neurofeedback meets the American Academy of 

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry criteria for Clinical Guidelines for treatment of ADHD." This means that 

neurofeedback meets the same criteria as medication for treating ADHD, of which 60% of prescriptions 

are in fact prescribed "off label," and that neurofeedback "should always be considered as an intervention 

for this disorder by the clinician." 

This service has been denied by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, United Behavioral Health, Blue Cross, Cigna, 

and Amerigroup. 

This is limitation of an effective and validated treatment for a mental health problem. The reasons given 

by the insurance companies for this denial fell into two categories: 1) our company does not cover 

biofeedback for mental health problems or 2) there is not yet sufficient evidence for the efficacy of 

neurofeedback. As such, they are using evidence-based criteria that are far more restrictive for mental 

health services than the criteria which are used for medical/surgical services. There are many routine 

medical and surgical procedures which have far fewer controlled studies about their efficacy than does 

neurofeedback. These medical and surgical procedures are generally not limited because of concerns 

about how many controlled studies have been performed about them. 
We believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity statute should require that 

employers and plans pay for the same range and scope of services for behavioral treatments as they do for 

medical surgical benefits and that a plan cannot be more restrictive in their managed care criteria and 

reviews for mental health and substance abuse disorders when compared to medical surgery. Today plans 

are being more restrictive in how they review evidenced-based mental health and Substance Abuse 

Treatments when compared to medical surgical treatments. This violates both the intent and letter of the 

parity statute and we hope that the regulations will clarify that this can't continue. 

   Gary Ames, Licensed Psychologist  

   Specializing in biofeedback and neurofeedback

   28 Rock Hill Road, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004

   610.668‐3223 phone <> fax 610.668‐0213

   www.AlertFocus.com