alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11.
 Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings

 In thousands, except per share amounts

 For the periods ended March 31             1997       1996

Primary earnings per common share:
  Average common shares outstanding ....    11,400    11,295
  Common stock equivalents .............       258       129
                                           -------   -------
    Average shares and share equivalents    11,658    11,424

Net income .............................   $ 5,548   $ 3,736

Primary net income per share ...........   $  0.48   $  0.33

Fully-diluted earnings per common share:
  Average common shares outstanding ....    11,400    11,295
  Common stock equivalents .............       258       129
                                           -------   -------
    Average shares and share equivalents    11,658    11,424

Net income .............................   $ 5,548   $ 3,736

Fully-diluted net income per share .....   $  0.48   $  0.33
-----Original Message----- 

From: s.sorozco@gmail.com [mailto:s.sorozco@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:56 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sonia Orozco 

3170 Andre Ln 

Turlock, CA 95382
###### Editorial Note on Part 173

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

#### § 173.2 Hazardous material classes and index to hazard class definitions.

The hazard class of a hazardous material is indicated by either the class or division number or the class name. The following table lists class numbers, division numbers, class or division names and those sections of this subchapter which contain definitions for classifying hazardous materials, including forbidden materials.

| Class No. | Division
number
(if applicable) | Name of class or division | 49 CFR reference for
definitions |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| None | | FORBIDDEN MATERIALS | 173.21 |
| None | | FORBIDDEN EXPLOSIVES | 173.54 |
| 1 | 1.1 | EXPLOSIVES (WITH A MASS EXPLOSION HAZARD) | 173.50 |
| 1 | 1.2 | EXPLOSIVES (WITH A PROJECTION HAZARD) | 173.50 |
| 1 | 1.3 | EXPLOSIVES (WITH PREDOMINATELY A FIRE HAZARD) | 173.50 |
| 1 | 1.4 | EXPLOSIVES (WITH NO SIGNIFICANT BLAST HAZARD) | 173.50 |
| 1 | 1.5 | VERY INSENSITIVE EXPLOSIVES; BLASTING AGENTS | 173.50 |
| 1 | 1.6 | EXTREMELY INSENSITIVE DETONATING SUBSTANCES | 173.50 |
| 2 | 2.1 | FLAMMABLE GAS | 173.115 |
| 2 | 2.2 | NON-FLAMMABLE COMPRESSED GAS | 173.115 |
| 2 | 2.3 | POISONOUS GAS | 173.115 |
| 3 | | FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID | 173.120 |
| 4 | 4.1 | FLAMMABLE SOLID | 173.124 |
| 4 | 4.2 | SPONTANEOUSLY COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL | 173.124 |
| 4 | 4.3 | DANGEROUS WHEN WET MATERIAL | 173.124 |
| 5 | 5.1 | OXIDIZER | 173.127 |
| 5 | 5.2 | ORGANIC PEROXIDE | 173.128 |
| 6 | 6.1 | POISONOUS MATERIALS | 173.132 |
| 6 | 6.2 | INFECTIOUS SUBSTANCE (ETIOLOGIC AGENT) | 173.134 |
| 7 | | RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL | 173.403 |
| 8 | | CORROSIVE MATERIAL | 173.136 |
| 9 | | MISCELLANEOUS HAZARDOUS MATERIAL | 173.140 |

Table 1 to § 173.2

[87 FR 79774, Dec. 27, 2022]
From: soozaroom@sio.midco.net [mailto:soozaroom@sio.midco.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:43 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Susan Zinck 

917 S Edward Dr 

Sioux Falls, SD 57103
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 24, 1995 (100), Para 100.22 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1184]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.100.22  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. SMITH of Michigan:

       Page 27, line 9, strike ``$1,665,000,000'' and insert 
     ``999,000,000''.
       Page 27, line 12, insert ``and'' after the semicolon.
       Page 27, line 15, strike the semicolon and all that follows 
     through ``project'' on page 30, line 6.

It was decided in the

Yeas

114

negative

Nays

302
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2310

To award a congressional gold medal to Francis Albert Sinatra.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 12, 1995

Mr. SERRANO (for himself and Mr. FRAZER) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To award a congressional gold medal to Francis Albert

Sinatra.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL.

4 (a) PRESENTATION AUTHORIZED.—The President is

5 authorized to present, on behalf of the Congress, to

6 Francis Albert ‘‘Frank’’ Sinatra a gold medal of appro7 priate design, in recognition of his accomplishments as an

8 entertainer and humanitarian, which include—

9 (1) having a career in the entertainment indus10 try spanning 5 decades where he produced, directed,

11 or appeared in more than 50 motion pictures, re-
2

•HR 2310 IH

1 corded thousands of songs with annual sales num2 bering in the millions, and won many major awards

3 in American popular entertainment including 7

4 Grammys, a Peabody, an Emmy and a Best Sup5 porting Actor Oscar; and

6 (2) earning the Life Achievement Award of the

7 NAACP, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and

8 Sciences’ Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award, and

9 the Presidential Medal of Freedom for his humani10 tarian and social justice efforts.

11 (b) DESIGN AND STRIKING.—For purposes of the

12 presentation referred to in subsection (a), the Secretary

13 of the Treasury shall strike a gold medal with suitable em14 blems, devices, and inscriptions to be determined by the

15 Secretary.

16 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATION.—There are

17 authorized to be appropriated not to exceed $30,000 to

18 carry out this section.

19 SEC. 2. DUPLICATE MEDALS.

20 (a) STRIKING AND SALE.—The Secretary of the

21 Treasury may strike and sell duplicates in bronze of the

22 gold medal struck pursuant to section 1 under such regu23 lations as the Secretary may prescribe, at a price sufficient

24 to cover the cost thereof, including labor, materials, dies,
3

•HR 2310 IH

1 use of machinery, and overhead expenses, and the cost of

2 the gold medal.

3 (b) REIMBURSEMENT OF APPROPRIATION.—The ap4 propriation used to carry out section 1 shall be reimbursed

5 out of the proceeds of sales under subsection (a).

6 SEC. 3. NATIONAL MEDALS.

7 The medals struck pursuant to this Act are national

8 medals for purposes of chapter 51 of title 31, United

9 States Code.

Æ
#### James Brown, as Administrator of the Estate of Patrick Brown, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant.

*Brown*v. *Long Island R. R. Co.,*134 App. Div. 933, affirmed.

(Argued January 5, 1911;

decided January 24, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 20, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s *590intestate alleged to liave been occasioned through defendant’s negligence.

*William C. Beecher*and *Joseph F. Keany*for appellant.

*Martin T. Manton*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Dissenting: Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 21
----------

CORPORATE ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
FOREMOST CORPORATION OF AMERICA
DECEMBER 31, 1995

Foremost Corporation of America (Delaware)
  FEIN: 38-1863522, NAIC Grp: 238
  -------------------------------------------
        Foremost Insurance Company, Grand Rapids, Michigan (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-1470533, NAIC: 11185
          -------------------------------------------------------------
              American Federation Insurance Company (Florida) 100%
                FEIN: 59-2326047, NAIC: 43699
              Foremost Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Indiana) 100%
                FEIN: 35-1604635, NAIC: 11800
              Foremost Signature Insurance Company (Michigan) 100%
                FEIN: 38-2430150, NAIC: 41513
              Federated Insurance Services of California (California) 100%
        Foremost Life Insurance Company (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-1843471, NAIC: 71439
        Foremost Financial Services Corporation (Delaware) 100%
          FEIN: 73-0462770
        Foremost Home Services Corporation (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-2260224
        Foremost Home Brokers, Inc. (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-2197432
        Starcrest Commerical Agency, Inc. (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-2505922
        Foremost Horizons, Inc. (New Hampshire) 100%
          FEIN: 02-0363083
        Foremost Affinity Services, Inc. (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 382234183
        Western Star Underwriters, Inc. (Texas) 100%
          FEIN: 74-1593853
        Foremost Real Estate Company (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-2429614
        Foremost Affiliated Insurance Services, Inc. (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-2336672
          ----------------------------------------------------------
              Pacific Way Insurance Agency, Inc. (Washington) 100%
                FEIN: 38-2987359
              Knight Agency, Inc. (Kentucky) 100%
                FEIN: 61-1281764
              Sunrise Insurance Agency, Inc. (Nevada) 100%
                FEIN: 88-0266963
              Sunrise Insurance Agency of Arizona, Inc. (Arizona) 100%
                FEIN: 31-1360491
              Corvette General Agency, Inc. (Georgia) 100%
                FEIN: 31-1368858
              Frontier Insurance Agency, Inc. (Oregon) 100%
                FEIN: 38-2987361
Foremost Lloyds of Texas (Texas)
  FEIN: 75-1779175, NAIC: 41688
Foremost County Mutual Insurance Company (Texas)
  FEIN: 38-1721730, NAIC: 29254
  ----------------------------------------------
      Sunrise Insurance Agency of Texas, Inc. (Texas) 100%
        FEIN: 38-2987749
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*James Preston, Respondent, *v.*Stephen B. French, etc., *Appellant.*

— Order reversed and proceedings remanded; trial of issues directed as suggested in opinion of

Brady, J.

Opinions by Davis, P. J., and Brady, J., and by Daniels, J., dissenting.
-----Original Message----- 

From: shirley.deay@verizon.net [mailto:shirley.deay@verizon.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:15 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Shirley Deay 

17 Sippewissett Rd 

Falmouth, MA 02540
#### § 502.283 Order of investigation.

When the Commission has determined that an investigation is necessary, an Order of Investigation shall be issued. [Rule 283.]
Editorial Note on Part 190
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 190 appear at 78 FR 58908, Sept. 25, 2013.

§ 190.201 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart describes the enforcement authority and sanctions exercised by the Associate Administrator for achieving and maintaining pipeline safety and compliance under 49 U.S.C. 60101 *et seq.,* 33 U.S.C. 1321(j), and any regulation or order issued thereunder. It also prescribes the procedures governing the exercise of that authority and the imposition of those sanctions.
( b ) A person who is the subject of action pursuant to this subpart may be represented by legal counsel at all stages of the proceeding.
[45 FR 20413, Mar. 27, 1980, as amended by Amdt. 190-6, 61 FR 18513, Apr. 26, 1996; Amdt. 190-16, 78 FR 58909, Sept. 25, 2013]
-----Original Message----- 

From: skiers2808@aol.com [mailto:skiers2808@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:19 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Depression and other mental health problems are as big a health problem 

as any visible illness and mental health needs to be on the same 

footing as cancer or diabetes, or any of the other horrible diseases. 

Sincerely, 

Susan Kierstead 

58 Seaverns Bridge Road 

Amherst, NH 03031
Editorial Note on Subpart B of Part 216
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart B of part 216 appear at 64 FR 25659, May 12, 1999.

§ 216.17 Appeals. ( a ) Upon receipt of a Special Notice prescribed in §§ 216.11, 216.13, 216.14, or 216.15, a railroad may appeal the decision of the Inspector to the FRA Regional Administrator for the region in which the notice was given. The appeal shall be made by letter or telegram. The FRA Regional Administrator assigns an inspector, other than the inspector from whose decision the appeal is being taken, to reinspect the railroad freight car, locomotive, railroad passenger equipment, or track. The reinspection will be made immediately. If upon reinspection, the railroad freight car, locomotive, or passenger equipment is found to be in serviceable condition, or the track is found to comply with the requirements for the class at which it was previously operated by the railroad, the FRA Regional Administrator or his or her agent will immediately notify the railroad, whereupon the restrictions of the Special Notice cease to be effective. If on reinspection the decision of the original inspector is sustained, the FRA Regional Administrator notifies the railroad that the appeal has been denied.
( b ) A railroad whose appeal to the FRA Regional Administrator has been denied may, within thirty (30) days from the denial, appeal to the Administrator. After affording an opportunity for informal oral hearing, the Administrator may affirm, set aside, or modify, in whole or in part, the action of the FRA Regional Administrator.
( c ) The requirements of a Special Notice issued under this subpart shall remain in effect and be observed by a railroad pending appeal to the FRA Regional Administrator or to the Administrator.
[67 FR 19989, Apr. 23, 2002]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending May 4, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
From: haroldtate@sbcglobal.net [mailto:haroldtate@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:45 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Harold Tate 

25101 Bear Valley Road PMB 178 

Tehachapi, CA 93561
#### § 1122.7 Request for confidential treatment.

Any person that produces documents to the Board pursuant to § 1122.3 or § 1122.4 may claim that some or all of the information contained in a particular document or documents is exempt from the mandatory public disclosure requirements of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, is information referred to in 18 U.S.C. 1905, or is otherwise exempt by law from public disclosure. In such case, the person making such a claim shall, at the time the person produces the document to the Board, indicate on the document that a request for confidential treatment is being made for some or all of the information in the document. In such case, the person making such a claim also shall file a brief statement specifying the specific statutory justification for non-disclosure of the information in the document for which confidential treatment is claimed. If the person states that the information comes within the exception in 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4) for trade secrets and commercial or financial information, and the information is responsive to a subsequent FOIA request to the Board, 49 CFR 1001.4 shall apply.
-----Original Message----- 

From: Robbyski40@aol.com [mailto:Robbyski40@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:29 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Robert Stewart 

PO Box 1099 

Bolinas, CA 94924
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending October 26, 2013

|Filer                             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                              
|--------------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|FIFTH THIRD BANK                  | * Branch       | Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati, OH to establish a branch at 42370 Ann Arbor Road, Plymouth, MI.                                                                     | Newspaper:11/08/2013Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                        | 11/08/2013    
|Federal Register:                 | Not applicable
|STATE BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, THE | * Branch       | Request by the State Bank and Trust Company, Defiance, OH to establish a new branch at 75 S. High Street, Dublin, OH and increase its investment in bank premise. | Newspaper:11/15/2013Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                        | 11/15/2013    
|Federal Register:                 | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us