alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

Assigned on Briefs July 21, 2004

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES FRANKLIN REDDEN

Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bedford County

No. 15066 Charles Lee, Judge

No. M2003-01768-CCA-R3-CD - Filed August 20, 2004

A Bedford County jury convicted the defendant, James Franklin Redden, of theft of property valued

over $1,000. The trial court sentenced him to eight years incarceration as a multiple offender. On

appeal, the defendant contends the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction. We dismiss

the appeal due to the untimely filing of a notice of appeal.

Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed 

JOE G.RILEY,SP. J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which JOSEPH M.TIPTON and ROBERT W.

WEDEMEYER, JJ., joined.

Donna Leigh Hargrove, District Public Defender; and Andrew Jackson Dearing, III, Assistant

District Public Defender, for the appellant, James Franklin Redden.

Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Thomas E. Williams, III, Assistant Attorney

General; William Michael McCown, District Attorney General; and Michael David Randles,

Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

OPINION

The defendant was convicted of theft over $1,000, a Class D felony, for stealing Nellie

Mahaffey’s vehicle on February 25, 2002. See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-14-103, -105(3). The trial

court ordered the defendant to serve eight years in confinement as a multiple offender. 

The defendant filed a pro se notice of appeal on June 26, 2003, over seven months after the

trial court’s entry of its November 12, 2002, order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Defense counsel subsequently filed a notice of appeal on July 22, 2003. Tennessee Rule of

Appellate Procedure 4(a) provides that a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days of the

judgment from which the appeal is taken. However, the appellate court in a criminal case may

waive the timely filing of a notice of appeal “in the interest of justice.” Tenn. R. App. P. 4(a); see

Crittenden v. State, 978 S.W.2d 929, 932 (Tenn. 1998). In the case at bar, the defendant filed his

notice of appeal more than six months beyond the thirty-day requirement. The record and the

defendant’s brief offer no explanation for the failure to file a notice of appeal in a timely fashion.
-2-

Moreover, the defendant has not requested that this court waive the timely filing of the notice of

appeal.

Sufficiency of the evidence is the only issue raised by the defendant on appeal. Upon

reviewing the record and the applicable law, we conclude this issue is utterly without merit.

Therefore, we conclude the “interest of justice” does not require a waiver of the timely filing of the

notice of appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

____________________________________

JOE G. RILEY, SPECIAL JUDGE
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, August 3, 1995 (108), Para 108.9 Message from the President]
[Page 1249]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.108.9  message from the president

  A message in writing from the President of the United States was 
communicated to the House by Mr. Edwin Thomas, one of his secretaries.

  The Committee resumed its sitting; and after some further time spent 
therein,
```
#### In the Matter of the Union Stock Yard and Market Company.

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Brady, J.
-----Original Message----- 

From: barbara_murray@verizon.net [mailto:barbara_murray@verizon.net] 

Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 9:53 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 02, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Barbara Murray 

933 College Ave 

Redlands, CA 92374
-----Original Message----- 

From: wstewart@buistmoore.com [mailto:wstewart@buistmoore.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:58 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Bill Stewart 

225 W Poplar St. 

Charleston, SC 29403
§ 227.9 Penalties. ( a ) Any person who violates any requirement of this part or causes the violation of any such requirement is subject to a civil penalty of at least $1,086 and not more than $35,516 per violation, except that: penalties may be assessed against individuals only for willful violations, and, where a grossly negligent violation or a pattern of repeated violations has created an imminent hazard of death or injury to persons, or has caused death or injury, a penalty not to exceed $142,063 per violation may be assessed. Each day a violation continues shall constitute a separate offense. See FRA's website at *www.fra.dot.gov* for a statement of agency civil penalty policy.
( b ) Any person who knowingly and willfully falsifies a record or report required by this part may be subject to criminal penalties under 49 U.S.C. 21311.
[71 FR 63123, Oct. 27, 2006, as amended at 73 FR 79702, Dec. 30, 2008; 77 FR 24421, Apr. 24, 2012; 81 FR 43110, July 1, 2016; 82 FR 16133, Apr. 3, 2017; 83 FR 60748, Nov. 27, 2018; 84 FR 23735, May 23, 2019; 84 FR 37073, July 31, 2019; 86 FR 1758, Jan. 11, 2021; 86 FR 23254, May 3, 2021; 87 FR 15868, Mar. 21, 2022; 88 FR 1127, Jan. 6, 2023; 88 FR 89562, Dec. 28, 2023]
-----Original Message----- 

From: rusty.simpson@gmail.com [mailto:rusty.simpson@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:21 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Rusty Simpson 

1523 Marshall st 

Baltimore, MD 21230
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from Central
Maine Power Company's Consolidated  Statement of Earnings,  Consolidated Balance
Sheet and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and is qualified in its entiirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1
<CURRENCY>                      U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997                
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1997               
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1997               
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1                
<BOOK-VALUE>                           PER-BOOK      
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      1,056,754
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                       76,509
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           255,191
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         910,512
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,298,966
<COMMON>                                         162,214
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        277,168
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                               48,212
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   487,594
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             39,528
<PREFERRED>                                       65,571
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             368,142
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                60,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                              0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                         0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    178,675
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                          7,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                       32,781
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   1,736
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1,057,939
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  2,298,966
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        954,176
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               7,424
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       889,733
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       897,157
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                           63,279
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 1,710
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                    64,989
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          51,567
<NET-INCOME>                                      13,422
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        8,209
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      5,213
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          29,220
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                         29,783
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                            92,210
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .16
        



</TABLE>
#### § 230.62 Dry pipe.

Dry pipes subject to pressure shall be examined at each annual inspection to measure wall thickness. Dry pipes with wall thickness reduced below that required to render the pipe suitable for the service intended at the MAWP must be replaced or repaired.
###### Editorial Note on Part 192

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

#### § 192.481 Atmospheric corrosion control: Monitoring.

(a) Each operator must inspect and evaluate each pipeline or portion of the pipeline that is exposed to the atmosphere for evidence of atmospheric corrosion, as follows:

| Pipeline type: | Then the frequency of inspection is: |
| --- | --- |
| (1) Onshore other than a Service Line | At least once every 3 calendar years, but with intervals not exceeding 39 months. |
| (2) Onshore Service Line | At least once every 5 calendar years, but with intervals not exceeding 63 months, except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section. |
| (3) Offshore | At least once each calendar year, but with intervals not exceeding 15 months. |

(b) During inspections the operator must give particular attention to pipe at soil-to-air interfaces, under thermal insulation, under disbonded coatings, at pipe supports, in splash zones, at deck penetrations, and in spans over water.

(c) If atmospheric corrosion is found during an inspection, the operator must provide protection against the corrosion as required by § 192.479.

(d) If atmospheric corrosion is found on a service line during the most recent inspection, then the next inspection of that pipeline or portion of pipeline must be within 3 calendar years, but with intervals not exceeding 39 months.

[Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53901, Sept. 15, 2003, as amended at 86 FR 2240, Jan. 11, 2021]
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 43 (Wednesday, March 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 12463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04881]

[[Page 12463]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to Arkion 
Life Sciences LLC of New Castle, Delaware, an exclusive license to U.S. 
Patent Application Serial No. 13/755,671, ``ULTRAVIOLET STRATEGY FOR 
AVIAN REPELLENCY'', filed on January 31, 2013.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 4, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Arkion Life Sciences LLC of 
New Castle, Delaware has submitted a complete and sufficient 
application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be 
royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be 
granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published 
Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and 
argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be 
consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Mojdeh Bahar,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-04881 Filed 3-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
```
#### NIASH REFINING COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. AZOR, INC., Defendant, Appellee.

No. 5331.

United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.

Oct. 21, 1958.

Robert D. Spille, New York City, for appellant.

Elliot A. Salter, Providence, R. I., for appellee.

Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

A judgment will be entered affirming the judgment of the District Court, on the basis of the opinion filed by Judge Day on December 6, 1957, 158 F.Supp. 505.
p. 1

rx> ;1 .., ... I, . ,,-~~ s'~~- "',C vL 0pi'T ( ;J IC 

# RheinChemie 2012E9;`,R -I AM6-- 00 February 16, 2012

Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M) Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) US Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20460-0001 Attention: 40 CFR 799.5089 Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112 Rhein Chemie Corporation 145 Parker Court Chardon, OH 44024 Phone: 440-285-3547 Toll free: 800-BUY CHEM Fax: 440-285-2464 www .rheinchemie .com

RE: Application for Exemption (on the basis of market exit), Section 4 Test Rule, Reaction mass of 1,3-Propanediol, 2-(hydroxymethyl)-2-[(methoxymethoxy)methyl]-and 1,3-dioxane-5,5- dimethanol, Testing of Certain Product Volume Chemicals, Third Group of Chemicals, Federal Register, Vol
. 76, No
. 65404, October 21, 2011, 40 CFR 799.5089 Dear Sir or Ma'am

: Rhein Chemie Corporation submits this application for exemption fromthe requirements for testing 1,3-Propanediol, 2-(hydroxymethyl)-2-[(methoxymethoxy)methyl]-and 1,3-dioxane-5,5-dimethanol under TSCASection 4 Test Rule "Testing of Certain High Product Volume Chemicals"
. Rhein Chemie Corporation is exiting the market and will deplete the current inventories which were imported in September of 2011
. Rhein Chemie Corporation is no longer importing 1,3- Propanediol, 2-(hydroxymethyl)-2-[(methoxymethoxy)methyl]-and 1,3-dioxane-5,5-dimethanol into the United States
. If you have any further questions, please contact me at the above number
.



### WEs Morrison VP Manufacturing & HESQ 

# u~r9~u,iMpiuoupuyumniw,Hiuo
180 ONSNiVINOO

Acompany of the,



# LANXESS GroupW V ^ C

O r r a a `o r o U , U 2 m O

C U o c a 'o L ~ L ¢ ~ U f~ U

O' ti O U

C O

. C O m Q U c c ~ o .~ oZo O O O > iF- (1) Oa ~ ~O O c ca C : O +' CU U c *r > v

- CL n ~ O

v) 

### ._ :3 a) 0- W O~ U_aU) C) 0~OD C U

o L

O N :

. . . `~1' ;

~ :'~f
-----Original Message----- 

From: csm4gwp@yahoo.com [mailto:csm4gwp@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:54 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Christine Milne 

POBox 30952 

Santa Barbara, CA 93130
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 

          - 15 CFR Part 922 
          - 50 CFR Part 660 
          - [Docket No. 0612242956-7411-02] 
          - RIN 0648-AT18 

# AGENCY:

National Marine Sanctuary Program (NMSP), National Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce (DOC). 

# ACTION:

Announcement of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

NOAA published a final rule on May 24, 2007 (72 FR 29208) that established marine reserves and a marine conservation area in the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary. Under the National Marine Sanctuaries Act, the final regulations would automatically take effect at the end of 45 days of continuous session of Congress beginning on May 24, 2007. The 45-day review period ended on Sunday, July 29, 2007. This document confirms the effective date as July 29, 2007. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         The final rule published on May 24, 2007 (72 FR 29208) took effect on July 29, 2007.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Sean Hastings, (805) 884-1472; e-mail:                         *Sean.Hastings@noaa.gov.*

Dated: August 3, 2007. 

William Corso, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management. 

[FR Doc. 07-3915  Filed 8-13-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-NK-M
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.923 How is direct assessment used and for what threats? ( a ) *General.* An operator may use direct assessment either as a primary assessment method or as a supplement to the other assessment methods allowed under this subpart. An operator may only use direct assessment as the primary assessment method to address the identified threats of external corrosion (EC), internal corrosion (IC), and stress corrosion cracking (SCC).
( b ) *Primary method.* An operator using direct assessment as a primary assessment method must have a plan that complies with the requirements in— ( 1 ) Section 192.925 and ASME B31.8S (incorporated by reference, see § 192.7) Section 6.4, and NACE SP0502 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 192.7) , if addressing external corrosion (EC).
( 2 ) Section 192.927 and NACE SP0206 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 192.7), if addressing internal corrosion (IC).
( 3 ) Section 192.929 and NACE SP0204 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 192.7), if addressing stress corrosion cracking (SCC).
( c ) *Supplemental method.* An operator using direct assessment as a supplemental assessment method for any applicable threat must have a plan that follows the requirements for confirmatory direct assessment in § 192.931.
[68 FR 69817, Dec. 15, 2003, as amended by Amdt. 192-114, 75 FR 48604, Aug. 11, 2010; Amdt. 192-119, 80 FR 178, 182, Jan. 5, 2015; 80 FR 46847, Aug. 6, 2015; Amdt. 192-132, 87 FR 52274, Aug. 24, 2022; Amdts. 192-135, 195-107, 89 FR 33282, Apr. 29, 2024]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2283 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2283

  To prohibit the regulation of the sale or use of tobacco or tobacco 
        products by the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 7, 1995

  Mr. Payne of Virginia (for himself, Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Baesler, Mr. 
 Boucher, Mr. Coble, Mr. Rogers, Mr. Hefner, Mr. Rose, Mr. Spratt, Mr. 
Scott, Mr. Bunning of Kentucky, Mr. Funderburk, Mr. Jones, Mr. Gordon, 
 Mr. Clyburn, Mr. Ward, Mr. Taylor of North Carolina, Mr. Clement, Mr. 
Chambliss, and Mr. Peterson of Florida) introduced the following bill; 
            which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the regulation of the sale or use of tobacco or tobacco 
        products by the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services may not 
regulate the sale or use of tobacco or tobacco products under the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and may not take any action with 
respect to tobacco or tobacco products under the Federal Cigarette 
Labeling and Advertising Act or the Comprehensive Smokeless Tobacco 
Health Education Act of 1986 which was not authorized before the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Regulations.--Any regulation issued by the Secretary of Health 
and Human Services relating the regulation of the sale or use of 
tobacco or tobacco products which takes effect before the date of the 
enactment of this Act shall on such date be considered as repealed.
    (c) Construction.--This Act shall not be construed as a statement 
that the Secretary of Health and Human Services had the authority to 
regulate the sale or use of tobacco or tobacco products before the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```