alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 13, 1995 (114), Para 114.4 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1330]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.114.4  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. FRANK:

       Page 5, after line 22, insert the following:

     SEC. 105. REDUCTION IN AUTHORIZATIONS.

       (a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), the 
     aggregate amount authorized to be appropriated by this Act, 
     including the amounts specified in the classified Schedule of 
     Authorizations referred to in section 102, is reduced by 
     three percent.
       (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) does not apply to amounts 
     authorized to be appropriated by section 201 for the Central 
     Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability Fund.
       (c) Transfer and Reprogramming Authority.--(1) The 
     President, in consultation with the Director of Central 
     Intelligence and the Secretary of Defense, may apply the 
     reduction required by subsection (a) by transferring amounts 
     among the accounts or reprogramming amounts within an 
     account, as specified in the classified Schedule of 
     Authorizations referred to in section 102, so long as the 
     aggregate reduction in the amount authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act equals three percent.
       (2) Before carrying out paragraph (1), the President shall 
     submit a notification to the Permanent Select Committee on 
     Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select 
     Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, which notification 
     shall include the reasons for each proposed transfer or 
     reprogramming.

It was decided in the

Yeas

162

negative

Nays

262
```
§ 209.113 Request for hearing. ( a ) If a respondent elects to request a hearing, he or she must submit a written request to the Chief Counsel referring to the case number which appeared on the notice of the probable violation. The request must— ( 1 ) State the name and address of the respondent and of the person signing the request if different from the respondent;
( 2 ) State with respect to each allegation whether it is admitted or denied; and
( 3 ) State with particularity the issues to be raised by the respondent at the hearing.
( b ) After a request for hearing which complies with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, the Chief Counsel schedules a hearing for the earliest practicable date.
( c ) The Chief Counsel or the hearing officer appointed under § 209.115 may grant extensions of the time of the commencement of the hearing for good cause shown.
# C_2005157EN.01014901.xml

| 28.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 157/149 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/149

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No. 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia to the European Union’

(COM(2004) 592 final — 2004/0202 (COD))

(2005/C 157/27)

On 10 December 2004 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 262 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the abovementioned proposal.

In view of the urgency of the work, the European Economic and Social Committee decided at its 413th plenary session of 15 and 16 December 2004 to appoint Mr Tóth as rapporteur-general and adopted the following opinion unanimously.

| 1. | The Committee approves the Commission's initiative to amend the Regulation (EC) No. 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia to the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Committee approves the Commission's initiative to amend the Regulation (EC) No. 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia to the European Union.

| 1.1 | The Committee advises the Commission to control country by country the Annex I, Annex II and Annex III to Regulation (EC) No. 1059/2003 to ensure the appropriate use of the terminology and language of the Member States regarding the NUTS 1, NUTS 2, NUTS 3 and existing administrative units and smaller administrative units. |
| --- | --- |

1.1

The Committee advises the Commission to control country by country the Annex I, Annex II and Annex III to Regulation (EC) No. 1059/2003 to ensure the appropriate use of the terminology and language of the Member States regarding the NUTS 1, NUTS 2, NUTS 3 and existing administrative units and smaller administrative units.

| 2. | The Committee believes that this exercise will help to integrate the classification of the territorial units of the new Member States into the statistical classification of the Community. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Committee believes that this exercise will help to integrate the classification of the territorial units of the new Member States into the statistical classification of the Community.

Brussels, 16 December 2004.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Anne-Marie SIGMUND

---
AFS-13-412-E

July 14, 2013

 Exemption No. 10825

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0509

Ms. Karen Keohane

Parent of Emerson Keohane

29 Morningside Drive

Wilmington, MA 01887

Dear Ms. Keohane:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received June 7, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Emerson Keohane for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Emerson to 

exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, 

manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard 

a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Emerson.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using 

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security 

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the 
2

petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by 

persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9834 grant.

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9834 also 

apply to the situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Emerson Keohane an exemption from § 121.311(b). In 

addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Emerson is

aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary 

to allow her to use an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Emerson’s parents

or a caregiver accompanying her. Emerson Keohane may only occupy a passenger seat with 

no passenger seated behind her. In addition, Emerson’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy 

of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 

hours before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

Enclosure
-----Original Message----- 

From: Nancy.Stephani@gmail.com [mailto:Nancy.Stephani@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:48 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Nancy Stephani 

2615 Goldenrod Lane 

Findlay, OH 45840
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1902

To remove the New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit Superfund Site from

the National Priorities List under the Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 20, 1995

Mr. ROSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and

Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To remove the New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit

Superfund Site from the National Priorities List under

the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF SITE FROM NATIONAL PRIOR4 ITIES LIST.

5 The Administrator of the Environmental Protection

6 Agency shall remove the New Hanover County Airport

7 Burn Pit Superfund Site, North Carolina, from the Na-
2

•HR 1902 IH

1 tional Priorities List under the Comprehensive Environ2 mental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of

3 1980 and, after the date of the enactment of this Act,

4 may not include such Site on such List again.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.736 Compressor stations: Gas detection. ( a ) Not later than September 16, 1996, each compressor building in a compressor station must have a fixed gas detection and alarm system, unless the building is— ( 1 ) Constructed so that at least 50 percent of its upright side area is permanently open; or
( 2 ) Located in an unattended field compressor station of 1,000 horsepower (746 kW) or less.
( b ) Except when shutdown of the system is necessary for maintenance under paragraph (c) of this section, each gas detection and alarm system required by this section must— ( 1 ) Continuously monitor the compressor building for a concentration of gas in air of not more than 25 percent of the lower explosive limit; and
( 2 ) If that concentration of gas is detected, warn persons about to enter the building and persons inside the building of the danger.
( c ) Each gas detection and alarm system required by this section must be maintained to function properly. The maintenance must include performance tests.
[58 FR 48464, Sept. 16, 1993, as amended by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37504, July 13, 1998]
-----Original Message----- 

From: andy46032@att.net [mailto:andy46032@att.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:36 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Andrew Ray 

13693 Stone Haven Dr. 

Carmel, IN 46033
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 27, 1995 (103), Para 103.30 Labor, HHS, Education Appropriations, FY 1996]
[Page 1213]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.103.30  labor, hhs, education appropriations, fy 1996

  Mr. YOUNG of Florida submitted a privileged report (Rept. No. 104-209) 
on the bill (H.R. 2127) making appropriations for the Departments of 
Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education and related agencies for 
the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes.
  When said bill and report were referred to the Union Calendar and 
ordered printed.

  Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XXI all points of order were reserved.
```
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.610 Change in class location: Change in valve spacing. ( a ) If a class location change on a transmission pipeline occurs after October 5, 2022, and results in pipe replacement, of 2 or more miles, in the aggregate, within any 5 contiguous miles within a 24-month period, to meet the maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP) requirements in § 192.611, § 192.619, or § 192.620, then the requirements in §§ 192.179, 192.634, and 192.636, as applicable, apply to the new class location, and the operator must install valves, including rupture-mitigation valves (RMV) or alternative equivalent technologies, as necessary, to comply with those sections. Such valves must be installed within 24 months of the class location change in accordance with the timing requirement in § 192.611(d) for compliance after a class location change.
( b ) If a class location change on a gas transmission pipeline occurs after October 5, 2022, and results in pipe replacement of less than 2 miles within 5 contiguous miles during a 24-month period, to meet the MAOP requirements in § 192.611, § 192.619, or § 192.620, then within 24 months of the class location change, in accordance with § 192.611(d), the operator must either: ( 1 ) Comply with the valve spacing requirements of § 192.179(a) for the replaced pipeline segment; or
( 2 ) Install or use existing RMVs or alternative equivalent technologies so that the entirety of the replaced pipeline segments are between at least two RMVs or alternative equivalent technologies. The distance between RMVs and alternative equivalent technologies for the replaced segment must not exceed 20 miles. The RMVs and alternative equivalent technologies must comply with the applicable requirements of § 192.636.
( c ) The provisions of paragraph (b) of this section do not apply to pipeline replacements that amount to less than 1,000 feet within any one contiguous mile during any 24-month period.
[Amdt. 192-130, 87 FR 20983, Apr. 8, 2022, as amended by Amdt. 192-134, 88 FR 50061, Aug. 1, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,207
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        9
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,088
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,216
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (218)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (218)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (218)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>(EPS-PRIMARY) AMUNT REPRESENTS NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
 UNIT
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 1503.609 Complaint. ( a ) *Filing.* The agency attorney must file the complaint with the Enforcement Docket Clerk in accordance with § 1503.429, or may file a written motion pursuant to § 1503.629(f)(2)(i) instead of filing a complaint, not later than 30 days after receipt by the agency attorney of a request for hearing. The agency attorney should suggest a location for the hearing when filing the complaint.
( b ) *Contents.* A complaint must set forth the facts alleged, any statute, regulation, or order allegedly violated by the respondent, and the proposed civil penalty in sufficient detail to provide notice of any factual or legal allegation and proposed civil penalty.
###### Editorial Note on Part 190

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 190 appear at 78 FR 58908, Sept. 25, 2013.

#### § 190.323 Consideration of comments received.

All timely comments and the recommendations of any technical advisory body established by statute for the purpose of reviewing the proposed rule concerned are considered before final action is taken on a rulemaking proposal. Late filed comments are considered so far as practicable.
H. R. 1880

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To designate the United States Post Office building located at 102 South McLean,

Lincoln, Illinois, as the ‘‘Edward Madigan Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States Post Office building located at 102 South

McLean, Lincoln, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the

‘‘Edward Madigan Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the United States Post

Office building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

a reference to the ‘‘Edward Madigan Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
SERVED OCTOBER 28, 2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

QUENTONT. BROWN 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] _ ^ 

(Civil Penalty Action) ^§ 0 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1009 '\;^ '"^ 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 201ICE030032) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge .f.E. Sullivan. Alt future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 

Chief Administrative Law 
FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1009 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2Wi000' 

ONE COPY 

Quenton T. Brown, Respondent . 

622 W.Miller Street 

Orlando, FL 32805-4502 

TEL: 321-594-8501 

Mark G. Camacho, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Central Region, ACE-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

901 Locust, Room 506 

Kansas City MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3765 

FAX; 816-329-3771 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E... 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Anention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30. 

- 1 -