```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 17, 1995 (95), Para 95.11 Providing for the Further Consideration of H.R. 1977]
[Pages 1136-1137]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.95.11  providing for the further consideration of h.r. 1977

  Mr. DREIER, by direction of the Committee on Rules, called up the 
following resolution (H. Res. 189):

       Resolved, That during further consideration of H.R. 1977 
     pursuant to House Resolution 187, further consideration of 
     the bill for amendment in the Committee of the Whole House on 
     the state of the Union shall proceed without intervening 
     motion except: (1) amendments printed in the portion of the 
     Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 6 
     of rule XXIII before July 14, 1995; (2) motions that the 
     Committee rise offered by the majority leader or his 
     designee; and (3) motions that the Committee rise and report 
     the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 
     adopted offered as preferential under clause 2(d) of rule 
     XXI. Each further amendment to the bill may be offered only 
     by the Member who caused it to be printed, shall be 
     considered as read, shall be debatable for ten minutes 
     equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 
     opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be 
     subject to a demand for division of the question in the House 
     or in the Committee of the Whole. The Chairman of the 
     Committee of the Whole may postpone until a time during 
     further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request 
     for a recorded vote on any amendment made in order by this 
     resolution. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may 
     reduce to not less than five minutes the time for voting by 
     electronic device on any postponed question that immediately 
     follows another vote by electronic device without intervening 
     business: Provided, That the time for voting by electronic 
     device on the first in any series of questions shall be not 
     less than fifteen minutes.

  When said resolution was considered.
  After debate,
  Mr. DREIER submitted the following amendment:

       Page 2, line 13, insert the following after the period:

[[Page 1137]]

       ``Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the following 
     amendments (identified by numerical designation pursuant to 
     clause 5 of rule XXIII) shall be debatable for 20 minutes 
     equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 
     opponent: the amendments numbered 11, 31, 40, 41, 57, 61, 65, 
     66, and 72. The amendment numbered 57 is hereby modified to 
     insert on page 94 after line 24.''.

  After further debate,
  On motion of Mr. DREIER, the previous question was ordered on the 
amendment and the resolution.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House agree to said amendment?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, announced that the yeas had it.
  So said amendment was agreed to.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House agree to said resolution, as amended?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, announced that the yeas had it.
  Mr. MILLER of California objected to the vote on the ground that a 
quorum was not present and not voting.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced that further proceedings on the motion were postponed.
  The point of no quorum was withdrawn.
```