alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Request for public comments.

# SUMMARY:

The FAA is requesting public comment on the Town of Sanford, Maine's, request to convey approx. 2.58 acres of Airport property from aeronautical use of non-aeronautical use. The property is located on Gatehouse Road, Sanford, Maine. York County Registry of Deeds, book/page/date 1113/303 12/30/47 & 1116/1 7/15/48. The property was acquired under AIP Project No. 3-23-0044-20. In exchange the airport will receive 2.9 acres of land for aeronautical purposes.

                        The disposition of proceeds from the disposal of airport property will be in accordance with FAA's Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use of Airport Revenue, published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on February 16, 1999.                    

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before September 24, 2007.

# ADDRESSES:

Documents are available for review by appointment by contacting Evan McDougal, Airport Manager at Sanford Regional Airport, Telephone 207-432-0596 or by contacting Tracey McInnis, Federal Aviation Administration, 16 New England Executive Park, Burlington, Massachusetts, Telephone 781-238-7621.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Tracey McInnis at the Federal Aviation Administration, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803, Telephone 781-238-7621.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21) requires the FAA to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment to the “waiver” or “modification” of a sponsor's Federal obligation to use certain airport property for aeronautical purposes.

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on August 9, 2007.

LaVerne F. Reid,

Manager, Airports Division, New England Region.

[FR Doc. 07-4124 Filed 8-22-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, September 18, 1995 (116), Para 116.17 Order of Business--Consideration of H.R. 39]
[Pages 1369-1370]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.116.17  order of business--consideration of h.r. 39

  On motion of Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That at any time hereafter the Speaker may, pursuant to 
clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 
of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 39) to amend the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management 
Act to improve fisheries management, and that consideration of the bill 
proceed according to the following order. The first reading of the bill 
shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of 
the bill are waived.

[[Page 1370]]

General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Resources. After general debate the bill 
shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall 
be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment 
under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Resources now printed in the bill. Each 
section of the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall 
be considered as read. All points of order against the committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and 
report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 
adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any 
amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the 
committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit 
with or without instructions.
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAnalysis of wind profile measurements from an instrumented aircraftThe results of an experimental program to determine the capability of measuring wind profiles on support of STS operations with an instrumented aircraft are discussed. These results are a compilation of the flight experiments and the statistical data comparing the quality of the aircraft measurements with quasi-simultaneous and quasi-spatial overlapping Jimsphere measurements. An instrumented aircraft was chosen as a potential alternative to the Jimsphere/radar system for expediting the wind profile calculation by virtue of the ability of an aircraft to traverse the altitudes of interest in roughly 10 minutes. The two aircraft which participated in the study were F-104 and ER-2.Document ID19910007210Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsPaige, Terry S.*(FWG Associates, Inc. Tullahoma, TN, United States)*Murphy, Patrick J.*(FWG Associates, Inc. Tullahoma, TN, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 30, 1990Subject CategoryMeteorology And ClimatologyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:184084NASA-CR-184084Accession Number91N16523Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-37377Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910007210.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
-----Original Message----- 

From: troybpierce@gmail.com [mailto:troybpierce@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:08 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Troy Pierce 

3784 University Drive NW 

Huntsville, AL 35816
-----Original Message----- 

From: bnickers99@yahoo.com [mailto:bnickers99@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 2:17 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Bruce Nickerson 

1672 Silverwood Dr. 

Tallahassee, FL 32301
-----Original Message----- 

From: fjakobci@chartermi.net [mailto:fjakobci@chartermi.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:01 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I would support this if nothing better, but single payer, universal 

health care is better, viable and pratical. Congress is lying and 

failing if it does not implement single payer/universal health care. 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Fred Jakobcic 

1025 N. Third Street 

Marquette, MI 49855
that the sentences run concurrently). The district court is afforded wide

discretion in its sentencing decision, see Houk v. State, 103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987), and absent sole reliance on impalpable or highly suspect evidence, we will not interfere with the district court's imposition of a sentence within statutory guidelines, see Silks v. State, 92 Nev. 91, 94, 545 P.2d 1159, 1161 (1976). Geiger does not allege that the district court relied on impalpable or highly suspect evidence nor that his sentence of 2 to 5 years falls outside the statutory parameters, see NRS 193.130; NRS 205.273(4). Moreover, it is within the district court's discretion to impose consecutive sentences, see NRS 176.035(1). We disagree with Geiger's argument that his consecutive sentence violates the purpose of NRS 176.035(1) and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion at sentencing.

Next, Geiger claims that his convictions for possession of a credit and/or debit card without consent and fraudulent use of a credit or debit card in district court case no. CR13-1712 violate the Double Jeopardy Clause. He argues that possession of a credit and/or debit card without consent is a lesser-included offense of fraudulent use of a credit or debit card and he cannot be convicted of both. The State concedes the error, and we agree. See Moore v. State, 122 Nev. 27, 35, 126 P.3d 508, 513 (2006). Therefore, we reverse the portion of the judgment of conviction in district court case no. CR13-1712 adjudicating Geiger guilty of being in possession of a credit and/or debit card without consent and remand for the district court to correct the judgment of conviction.

Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of conviction in Docket No. 66104 AFFIRMED and the judgment of conviction in Docket No. 66115

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0') I 047A oe

### ho4 Cherry J. J. Douglas AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order.



## /-4tA,Sat.. 1 Hardesty

cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge Washoe County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 

### 3
(0) I947A i4IP94
§ 214.115 Foot protection. ( a ) The railroad or railroad contractor shall require railroad bridge workers to wear foot protection equipment when potential foot injury may result from impact, falling or flying objects, electrical shock or burns, or other hazardous condition.
( b ) Foot protection equipment required by this section shall conform to the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.136(b), as established by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
[67 FR 1908, Jan. 15, 2002, as amended at 74 FR 25172, May 27, 2009; 81 FR 37885, June 10, 2016]
U.S. Office of Special Counsel

1730 M Street, N.W., Suite 218

Washington, D.C. 20036-4505

OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL ANNOUNCES SETTLEMENT OF 

FIRST AMENDMENT CASE 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Darshan A. Sheth, (202) 254-3617; dsheth@osc.gov

WASHINGTON, DC/January 26, 2011—Today, the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) announced the 

resolution of a prohibited personnel practice complaint filed by a federal employee against the U.S. Naval 

Academy (USNA). The employee, a professor with USNA, alleged that in violation of his First Amendment 

right to free speech, he was denied an annual merit pay increase because he published newspaper articles 

criticizing USNA policies. The specific terms of the settlement are required to be kept confidential by 

agreement of the parties. The parties, however, have expressed their mutual satisfaction with those terms.

OSC’s investigation uncovered evidence indicating that USNA illegally denied the employee a merit pay 

increase because of his public statements. In June of 2009, the employee published an article in a local 

newspaper criticizing USNA’s admissions policies, which he argued gave minority applicants an unfair 

advantage. In September of 2009, the employee learned that he was being denied a merit pay increase 

that year although his immediate supervisor had recommended him for one. When asked to explain the 

decision, one official told members of the USNA faculty that the employee should not be rewarded for the 

manner in which he had expressed his concerns outside USNA. A few months later, the employee was also 

issued a warning letter informing him that if he continued making inappropriate public statements, 

disciplinary action could be taken against him.

While the investigation was ongoing, OSC negotiated an informal settlement of the complaint. Without 

admitting fault, USNA agreed to the settlement.

Associate Special Counsel William E. Reukauf observed that “no federal employee should fear that he will 

be penalized on the job for expressing an opinion on controversial matters of public concern.” Mr. Reukauf 

noted his appreciation for USNA’s cooperation during the investigation and its willingness to resolve the 

complaint, thus avoiding the possibility of protracted litigation. 

****

The U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) is an independent federal agency that investigates and prosecutes complaints alleging the 

commission of prohibited personnel practices. Pursuant to statute, OSC, acting on behalf of victims of prohibited personnel 

practices, has authority to seek voluntary corrective action from federal agencies or through administrative litigation before the U.S. 

Merit Systems Protection Board. For more information please visit our web site at www.osc.gov or call (800) 872-9855.
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.454 Integrity assessments for certain underwater hazardous liquid pipeline facilities located in high consequence areas. Notwithstanding any pipeline integrity management program or integrity assessment schedule otherwise required under § 195.452, each operator of any underwater hazardous liquid pipeline facility located in a high consequence area that is not an offshore pipeline facility and any portion of which is located at depths greater than 150 feet under the surface of the water must ensure that: ( a ) Pipeline integrity assessments using internal inspection technology appropriate for the integrity threats to the pipeline are completed not less often than once every 12 months, and;
( b ) Pipeline integrity assessments using pipeline route surveys, depth of cover surveys, pressure tests, external corrosion direct assessment, or other technology that the operator demonstrates can further the understanding of the condition of the pipeline facility, are completed on a schedule based on the risk that the pipeline facility poses to the high consequence area in which the pipeline facility is located.
[Amdt. 195-102, 84 FR 52298, Oct. 1, 2019]
§ 178.33a-2 Type and size. ( a ) Single-trip inside containers. Must be seamless, or with seams welded, soldered, brazed, double seamed, or swedged.
( b ) The maximum capacity of containers in this class shall not exceed 1 L (61.0 cubic inches). The maximum inside diameter shall not exceed 3 inches.
[Order 71, 31 FR 9074, July 1, 1966. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967, and amended by Amdt. 178-43, 42 FR 42208, Aug. 22, 1977; Amdt. 178-101, 58 FR 50237, Sept. 24, 1993; 66 FR 45387, Aug. 28, 2001]
-----Original Message----- 

From: robyn8075@hotmail.com [mailto:robyn8075@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 8:29 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 01, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Robyn Levin 

2353 Nash ln 

Oxnard, CA 93033
#### Fisk v. Aldrich, *and the*County of Hillsborough, *Trustee.*

A complainant who has instituted and carried oil a prosecution for a violation of the law relating to the sale of spirituous liquor, and has become entitled, by a judgment of court, to one half of fines collected through such prosecution, cannot, by a subsequent disclaimer of his interest in such fines, defeat an attachment thereof by trustee process.

Foreign Attachment. Question whether the trustee should be charged. Before the commencement of this suit, the defendant instituted prosecutions against two persons for violation of the liquor law, and caused them to be indicted on his own testimony, intending to claim half of the fines, under Gen. St., *c.*99, *s.*21, and declaring that he made complaint, and testified before *the*grand jury for that purpose. When the expected fines were imposed and paid to the trustee, and the moieties to which the defendant was entitled “were attached in this suit, he disclaimed all interest in them.

*Wadleigh <$• Wallace,*for the plaintiff.

*Burns,*solicitor, for the trustee.

Foster, J.

A complainant, instituting and carrying on prosecutions for the illegal sale of spirituous liquor, is “ entitled to one half of every fine collected through such prosecution.” Gen. St., *c.*99, *s.*21. When the fines were paid into the county treasury, the *114plaintiff was entitled to one half of *them.*His disclaimer, after attachment by trustee process, of any interest in the fines which prior thereto he was seeking to obtain and was entitled to receive, will not enable him to accomplish his design to defraud his creditor. By the provisions of Gen. St., *c.*230, s. 28, the trustee is chargeable.

*Case discharged..*

*•*Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
-----Original Message----- 

From: bcoombs@interfold.com [mailto:bcoombs@interfold.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:41 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Barbara coombs 

5143 S. Parfet wy. 

littleton, CO 80127
Phone Record

– September 22, 2010

EPA: Lisa Snapp

EDF: Vickie Patton, Sharon Stein , Kathryn Phillips
Red Mountain Group: Hilary Sinnamon

Subject: Fuel Economy Labeling Proposal

EDF discussed their a p preciation of the transparency in the proposal, especially with respect to the market research

. In response to questions posed by EDF, discussed details of the proposal that are lacking in clarity, including applicability of the letter grade across vehicle technologies and what pieces of information are included on the various proposed labels.
Discussion of the market research and expert panel that fed into the proposed labels.
Questions about timing of public hearings and close of comment period.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Vista Continental Corporation.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30th, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Arthur de Joya, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                                                      /s/ Arthur de Joya
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Arthur de Joya
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
January 20, 2004