alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 213.5 Responsibility for compliance. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, any owner of track to which this part applies who knows or has notice that the track does not comply with the requirements of this part, shall— ( 1 ) Bring the track into compliance;
( 2 ) Halt operations over that track; or
( 3 ) Operate under authority of a person designated under § 213.7(a), subject to conditions set forth in this part. If the operation is on continuous welded rail (CWR) track, the person under whose authority operations are conducted must also be designated under § 213.7(c).
( b ) If an owner of track to which this part applies designates a segment of track as “excepted track” under the provisions of § 213.4, operations may continue over that track without complying with the provisions of subparts B, C, D, and E of this part, unless otherwise expressly stated.
( c ) If an owner of track to which this part applies assigns responsibility for the track to another person (by lease or otherwise), written notification of the assignment shall be provided to the appropriate FRA Regional Office at least 30 days in advance of the assignment. The notification may be made by any party to that assignment, but shall be in writing and include the following— ( 1 ) The name and address of the track owner;
( 2 ) The name and address of the person to whom responsibility is assigned (assignee);
( 3 ) A statement of the exact relationship between the track owner and the assignee;
( 4 ) A precise identification of the track;
( 5 ) A statement as to the competence and ability of the assignee to carry out the duties of the track owner under this part; and
( 6 ) A statement signed by the assignee acknowledging the assignment to him of responsibility for purposes of compliance with this part.
( d ) The Administrator may hold the track owner or the assignee or both responsible for compliance with this part and subject to penalties under § 213.15.
( e ) A common carrier by railroad which is directed by the Surface Transportation Board to provide service over the track of another railroad under 49 U.S.C. 11123 is considered the owner of that track for the purposes of the application of this part during the period the directed service order remains in effect.
( f ) When any person, including a contractor for a railroad or track owner, performs any function required by this part, that person is required to perform that function in accordance with this part.
[63 FR 34029, June 22, 1998, as amended at 85 FR 63387, Oct. 7, 2020]
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A0 48 2 . SHAW NDREA VI NI NG v . MAI N STREET RENEW AL, LLC.

Th i s cas e b eg an as a d is p o s s es s o ry p ro ceed i n g i n m ag is t rat e co urt

. Fo l l o wi n g

an ad v ers e ru l i n g , d efen d an t Sh awn d rea Vi n i n g ap p eal ed t o t h e s up eri o r co u rt , wh i ch

en t ered a fi n al o rd er an d ju d g m en t i n fav o r o f t h e p l ai nt i ff. V i n i n g t h en ap p eal ed d i rect l y t o t h i s Co u rt

. W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Ap p eal s fro m s up eri o r co u rt d eci s i o n s rev i ewi n g l o wer co urt deci s i o n s by
cert io rari o r d e n o v o p ro ceed in g s m u s t b e in i t i at ed b y fi l i ng an ap pl i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal

. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 ), (b ); Bu l l o ck v. S a nd , 2 6 0 Ga. A p p

. 8 7 4, 8 7 5 (5 81 SE2 d 3 3 3 ) (2 0 0 3 ). “ Co m p l i an ce wi t h t h e di s cret i on ary ap p eal s p ro ced u re i s ju ri s d i ct i o nal .” S

mo a k v. Dep t

. of Hu m an Res ou r ces , 2 2 1 Ga. Ap p

. 2 5 7 , 25 7 (4 7 1 S E 2 d 60 ) (1 9 9 6 ). Vi n i ng ’ s fai l u re t o fo l l o w t h e p ro p er p ro ced u re dep ri ves u s o f ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t h is d i rect ap p eal , wh i ch is h ereb y DISM ISSED. See B ul l o ck , 2 6 0 Ga. Ap p . at 8 7 5

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. November 04, 2020

11/04/2020
Docket: IRS-2009-0008 

Request for Information for Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 

2008 

Comment On: IRS-2009-0008-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: IRS-2009-0008-0071 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-09629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Andrea Joy Sime 

Address: 

Lincoln, NE, 

Organization: First Step Wellness Center 

General Comment 

Please support neurofeedback therapy as parity with medical/surgical interventions 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 28, 2009 

Tracking No. 809b9172 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009
§ 236.1027 PTC system exclusions. ( a ) The requirements of this subpart apply to each office automation system that performs safety-critical functions within, or affects the safety performance of, the PTC system. For purposes of this section, “office automation system” means any centralized or distributed computer-based system that directly or indirectly controls the active movement of trains in a rail network.
( b ) Changes or modifications to PTC systems otherwise excluded from the requirements of this subpart by this section do not exclude those PTC systems from the requirements of this subpart if the changes or modifications result in a degradation of safety or a material decrease in safety-critical functionality.
( c ) Primary train control systems cannot be integrated with locomotive electronic systems unless the complete integrated systems: ( 1 ) Have been shown to be designed on fail-safe principles;
( 2 ) Have demonstrated to operate in a fail-safe mode;
( 3 ) Have a manual fail-safe fallback and override to allow the locomotive to be brought to a safe stop in the event of any loss of electronic control; and
( 4 ) Are included in the approved and applicable PTCDP and PTCSP.
( d ) PTC systems excluded by this section from the requirements of this subpart remain subject to subparts A through H of this part as applicable.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Datakey, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Timothy L. Russell, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 12, 2003

| |  |            |  |                                                                  
| |  | ---------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Signature: |  | /s/ Timothy L. Russell
Timothy L. Russell
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,089,798
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      3,500
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         103,890
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       223,519
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   8,293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,429,000
<COMMON>                                        45,535
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      108,137
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            271,019
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 424,691
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,680
<PREFERRED>                                     12,795
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           128,042
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      215,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  68,416
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   33,330
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 541,046
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,429,000
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      515,175
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            26,666
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     408,210
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     434,876
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         80,299
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 862
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  81,161
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        27,360
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,801
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,137
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   51,664
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        36,194
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        8,992
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         113,384
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.24
        

</TABLE>
From: kjaer9365@comcast.net [mailto:kjaer9365@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 6:25 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

In our community there clearly are individuals who are desparately in 

need of medical treatment and supervision. Their inability to function 

affects us all and equal treatment for them would be a positive 

influence on the general health and safety of the community. 

Please treaat them in the same way as other medical patients. 

Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

eunice kjaer 

814 Lorane Highway 

Eugene, OR 97405
-----Original Message----- 

From: snazzyrrw@hotmail.com [mailto:snazzyrrw@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 2:23 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 02, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Rebecca Welge 

8614 Joseph Ave. 

St. Louis, MO 63144
126 STAT. 1606 PUBLIC LAW 112–226—DEC. 28, 2012 

Public Law 112–226 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands to provide for direct 

review by the United States Supreme Court of decisions of the Virgin Islands 

Supreme Court, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DIRECT REVIEW BY U.S. SUPREME COURT OF DECISIONS 

OF VIRGIN ISLANDS SUPREME COURT. 

Section 23 of the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands 

(48 U.S.C. 1613) is amended by striking ‘‘: Provided, That’’ and 

all that follows through the end and inserting a period. 

SEC. 2. JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 81 of title 28, United States Code, 

is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘§ 1260. Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands; certiorari 

‘‘Final judgments or decrees rendered by the Supreme Court 

of the Virgin Islands may be reviewed by the Supreme Court 

by writ of certiorari where the validity of a treaty or statute of 

the United States is drawn in question or where the validity of 

a statute of the Virgin Islands is drawn in question on the ground 

of its being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of 

the United States, or where any title, right, privilege, or immunity 

is specially set up or claimed under the Constitution or the treaties 

or statutes of, or any commission held or authority exercised under, 

the United States.’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sections for chapter 

81 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

end the following new item: 

‘‘1260. Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands; certiorari.’’. 

28 USC 1260. 

Dec. 28, 2012 

[H.R. 6116] 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1PROD with PUBLAWS
PUBLIC LAW 112–226—DEC. 28, 2012 126 STAT. 1607 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6116: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012): 

Nov. 14, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 13, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

The amendments made by this Act apply to cases commenced 

on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Approved December 28, 2012. 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1PROD with PUBLAWS
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 24, 1995 (72), Para 72.4 American Overseas Interests]
[Pages 808-809]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.72.4  american overseas interests

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BONILLA, pursuant to House Resolution 155 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the further consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 1561) to consolidate the foreign affairs agencies of the 
United States; to authorize appropriations for the Department of State 
and related agencies for fiscal years 1996 and 1997;

[[Page 809]]

to responsibly reduce the authorizations of appropriations for United 
States foreign assistance programs for fiscal years 1996 and 1997, and 
for other purposes.
  Mr. GOODLATTE, Chairman of the Committee of the Whole, resumed the 
chair; and after some time spent therein,
```
§ 229.205 General requirements. ( a ) Each wide-nose locomotive used in occupied service must meet the minimum crashworthiness performance requirements set forth in Appendix E of this part. Compliance with those performance criteria must be established by: ( 1 ) Meeting an FRA-approved crashworthiness design standard (including AAR S-580, Locomotive Crashworthiness Requirements). The Director of the Federal Register approves incorporation by reference of the AAR S-580 (revised July 2005), “Locomotive Crashworthiness Requirements,” in this section in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain a copy of the incorporated standard from the Association of American Railroads, 50 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20001. You may inspect a copy of the incorporated standard at the Federal Railroad Administration, Docket Clerk, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html ;*
( 2 ) Meeting new design standards and changes to existing design standards approved by FRA pursuant to § 229.207; or
( 3 ) Meeting an alternative crashworthiness design approved by FRA pursuant to § 229.209.
( b ) A monocoque or semi-monocoque design locomotive must be designed in accordance with the provisions of AAR S-580, applicable to those types of locomotives, in accordance with §§ 238.405(a), 238.409 and 238.411 of this chapter, or in accordance with a standard or design approved by FRA as providing at least equivalent safety.
( c ) A narrow-nose locomotive must be designed in accordance with the provisions of AAR S-580, applicable to that type of locomotive (notwithstanding any limitation of scope contained in that standard) or in accordance with a standard or design approved by FRA as providing at least equivalent safety.
[71 FR 36912, June 28, 2006, as amended at 74 FR 25173, May 27, 2009]
From: McKaughan, Colleen

Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 4:27 PM

To: Bohnee, Gary

Cc: Nudd, Gregory; Webb, Thomas; Martz, Verle

Subject: RE: Consultation with Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (SRPMIC)

Thank you, Gary. We look forward to our meeting with you.

Colleen W. McKaughan

Associate Director, Air Division

USEPA, Region 9

(520) 498-0118

From: "Bohnee, Gary" <Gary.Bohnee@SRPMIC-nsn.gov>

To: Colleen McKaughan/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Martz, Verle" <vmartz@srmaterials.com>, Thomas Webb/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Gregory 

Nudd/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/12/2013 03:55 PM

Subject: RE: Consultation with Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (SRPMIC)

Ms. McKaughan, 

Thank you for the email. I apologize for not responding sooner. I will check with staff to determine an 

optimal time to request a meeting with you and your staff. 

Thanks, 

Gary Bohnee

From: McKaughan.Colleen@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:McKaughan.Colleen@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 2:36 PM

To: Bohnee, Gary

Cc: Martz, Verle; Webb.Thomas@epamail.epa.gov; Nudd.Gregory@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Consultation with Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (SRPMIC)

Dear Mr. Bohnee,

I believe I left you a voicemail on this topic several days ago. I wanted to follow up on the SRPMIC's request for 

consultation regarding EPA's proposed action on the Arizona Regional Haze SIP. We would be glad to meet with 

you and other representatives of the Tribe at your convenience.

We have extended the public comment period in response to several requests, including the Tribe's, and the public 

comment period now extends to March 6, 2013. We have provided Mr. Martz with the draft information prepared by 

our contractor. We are reviewing the contractor information internally but would be interested in any discrepancies 

noted by SRPMIC or Phoenix Cement.

Please let me know when you would like consultation to take place. Thank you very much.

Colleen W. McKaughan

Associate Director, Air Division

USEPA, Region 9

(520) 498-0118
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         147,402
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             134
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    229,792
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         750,500
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           750,497
<LOANS>                                      1,545,119
<ALLOWANCE>                                     26,439
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,935,452
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,054,186
<SHORT-TERM>                                   410,464
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             38,732
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       432,070
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,935,452
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 74,385
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               29,598
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,206
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               105,189
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              26,601
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,543
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           70,646
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,400
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 54,359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,170
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      50,170
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,904
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,089
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,584
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 85,519
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                24,678
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,693
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,054
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               26,439
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            11,016
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         15,423


</TABLE>
P. 1 

# 4W . May 27, 2010 

# 327239

,_ .
JimWillis Director, Chemical Control Division (7405M) Room4146 EPA East U .S. Environmental Protection Agency 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 202-564-4760 DuPont TitaniumTechnologies Edge Moor Plant 104 Hay Road Edge Moor, DE 19809

, _

. a~
Attn: EPA Docket ID Number OPPT-2004-0113 Memorandum

of Understanding (MOU) between the U .S . Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and E. 1 . DuPont de Nemours and Company (DuPont:) for a Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Site-Related Environmental Assessment Program(November 3, 2005) Re: Request for Extension - Future Work Plan Submission Dear Mr . Willis, This letter is submitted pursuant to Section V.F .1 of the above-referenced MOU . Section V.F .1 of the MOU provides DuPont 90 days fromthe completion of the Peer Consultation Process, pursuant to Section V.E .2.n of the MOU, to submit a full Future Work Plan to EPA

. Based on the discussions between DuPont and EPAon May 13, 2010, we are notifying EPAof the need for a schedule extension and are requesting an additional 90 days to develop and submit a full Future Work Plan. We anticipate that a Future Work Plan will be submitted to EPA on August 18, 2010 .

Andrew S. Hartten Project Director DuPont Corporate Remediation Group cc : Document Control, EPA 

## CONTAINS NOCBI
El du Pont de Nemours and Company