alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ACADIA
                POWER PARTNERS,
                LLC
              EXHIBIT
                  23(c)
 
 Consent
        of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
  We
        hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
        on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-109506 and 333-55656) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-10169,
        33-26726, 33-38362, 33-44663, 333-44364, 333-59692, 333-59696, 333-124716,
        and
        333-127496) of Cleco Corporation of our report dated February 27, 2008 relating
        to the consolidated financial statements of Acadia Power Partners LLC, which
        appears in this Form 10-K.
  
 
 
 
 /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers
                  LLPNew
                  Orleans, LouisianaFebruary
                  27, 2008
Interim Decision #2229

MATTER OF JIMENEZ
In Exclusion Proceedings

A-18272169


### Decided by Board September 24,1973

Conviction of criminal possession of forgery devices with intent to use them for the purpose of forgery (N.Y.) is conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude.

EXCLUDABLE: Act of 1952—Section 212(a)(9) [8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9A—Prior to entry—convicted of crime involving moral turpitude, to wit: criminal possession of forgery devices.

ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT: Juan J. Turull, Esquire P.O. Box 2099 .San Juan, Puerto Rico 00903

This is an appeal from an order of exclusion and deportation entered by the immigration judge. The appeal will be dismissed. The record relates to a married male alien, a native and citizen of Colombia, 42 years of age, who was admitted to the United States as an immigrant on July 17, 1968. The applicant last arrived at San Juan, Puerto Rico on September 21, 1972 and applied for admission as a returning resident. The applicant was paroled into the United States pending these exclusion proceedings. He ischarged with being excludable on the ground that he was convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude prior to entry, to wit,criminal possession of forgery devices. The record before us contains a certified copy of the record of conviction, which shows that the applicant was convicted in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, on a plea of guilty on January 14, 1971. On appeal, counsel contends that the conviction should not be used as the basis for exclusion because the applicant was not in fact guilty. Counsel contends, amoung other things, that the . applicant did not know English well enough to enter a meaningful guilty plea. Such a collateral challenge to a judgment presents no Question which we can consider; the conviction is res judicata on the issue of the applicant's guilt.

442Interim Decision #2229 The applicant further contends that the crime of which he was convicted does not involve moral turpitude. We conclude that it does. Criminal possession has been held to be a crime involving moralturpitude when accompanied by intent to commit a crime involving moral turpitude, U.S. ex rel. Guarino v. Uhl, 107 F.2d 339 (C.A. 2, 1939). In this ease the applicant was convicted on a plea of guilty to the charge of criminal possession of forgery devices with intent to use them for the purpose of forgery (Ex. 3; pp. B2 & B15). Forgery has been held to be a crime involving moral turpitude, 38 Op. Atty. Gen. 128 (1934); Matter of A-, 5 I. & N. Dec. 52 (B IA 1953); Morasch v. INS, 363 F.2d 30 (C.A. 9, 1966); U.S. ex rel. Robinson v. Day, 51 F.2d

.1022 (C.A. 2, 1931). Thus, the crime of which the applicant was convicted involved moral turpitude. The decision of the immigration judge was correct. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.

443
> Air Transportation Sector Notebook- Table of Contents  Chapter I - Introduction To The Sector Notebook Project
Chapter II - Introduction To The Air Transportation Industry
Chapter III - Description Of Operations
Chapter IV - Description Of Operations
Chapter V - Summary Of Federal Statutes And Regulations
Chapter VI - Compliance And Enforcement History
Chapter VII - Compliance Assurance Activities And Initiatives
Chapter VIII - Resource Materials/Bibliography
Appendix A - Instructions For Downloading This Notebook
Return to the top of this page

Last Updated: March 6, 1998
-----Original Message----- 

From: joseph.tangney@gmail.com [mailto:joseph.tangney@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:02 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Joseph Tangney 

10734 2ND Ave NW 

Seattle, WA 98177
§ 209.1 Purpose. Appendix A to this part contains a statement of agency policy concerning enforcement of those laws. This part describes certain procedures employed by the Federal Railroad Administration in its enforcement of statutes and regulations related to railroad safety. By delegation from the Secretary of Transportation, the Administrator has responsibility for: ( a ) Enforcement of subchapters B and C of chapter I, subtitle B, title 49, CFR, with respect to the transportation or shipment of hazardous materials by railroad (49 CFR 1.49(s));
( b ) Exercise of the authority vested in the Secretary by the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970, 45 U.S.C. 421, 431-441, as amended by the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 1988, Public Law 100-342 (June 22, 1988) (49 CFR 1.49(m)); and
( c ) Exercise of the authority vested in the Secretary pertaining to railroad safety as set forth in the statutes transferred to the Secretary by section 6(e) of the Department of Transportation Act, 49 App. U.S.C. 1655(e) (49 CFR 1.49 (c), (d), (f), and (g)).
[42 FR 56742, Oct. 28, 1977, as amended at 53 FR 52920, Dec. 29, 1988; 54 FR 42905, Oct. 18, 1989]
-----Original Message----- 

From: skjdesign@comcast.net [mailto:skjdesign@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:44 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sandra Johnson 

51 overlook 

Aspen, CO 81611
-----Original Message----- 

From: sanbrown76@gmail.com [mailto:sanbrown76@gmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 12:47 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sandra Brown 

128 Laurel Loop 

Asheville, NC 28806
#### Andrew S. Trundy and others, Appellants, v. Samuel Van Wyck and others, Respondents.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements and injunction continued. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 22, 2014. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 22, 2014 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15A0301. CHRISTINA FENTON v. MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement during the period that commenced January 1, 2019 and ended December 31, 2019 has been made under the supervision of the undersigned pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Servicing Agreement; and |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Servicing Agreement throughout the period that commenced January 1, 2019 and ended December 31, 2019. |

|                           |
|---------------------------|
|                           |  |  |
| THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY |
|                      |   |
| By:                       |  /s/ Steven R. Staub    |   |
|                      |   |   |
| Name:                     | Steven R. Staub |   |
| Title:                    | Vice President and Treasurer |   |
**DESCRIPTION OF AN AMENDMENTIN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTETO THE PROVISIONS IN H.R. 4738**

**Scheduled for a Markup by the**

**HOUSE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS**

**On**

**October 9, 1998**

**Prepared by the Staff**

**of the**

**JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION**

**October 9, 1998**

**JCX-69-98**

----

**DESCRIPTION OF AN AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE TO THE PROVISIONS IN H.R. 4738**

	On October 9, 1998, the House Committee on Ways and Means has scheduled a markupof the provisions contained in H.R. 4738.  A description of these provisions are contained inJCX-66-98 and JCX-67-98.  The amendment in the nature of a substitute would adopt theprovisions of H.R. 4738, with the following additional provision:(1)

**State Election to Exempt Student Employees From Social Security**

**Present Law**

	The Social Security Amendments of 1972 provided an opportunity for States to obtainexemptions from Social Security coverage for student employees of public schools, colleges, anduniversities.  States choosing to opt out had to do so prior to January 1, 1974.  Most States did. Student employees in these States do not have to pay FICA taxes on their wages, allowing themto keep more of their earnings.

**Description of Proposal**

	The proposal would allow a limited window of time (January 1 through March 31, 1999)for States to modify existing State agreements to exempt students (including graduate assistants)from Social Security coverage who are employed by a public school, university, or college in anonexempted State.

----

1.   This document may be cited as follows: Joint Committee on Taxation, *Description ofan Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to the Provisions in H.R. 4738* (JCX-69-98), October9, 1998.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta

Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 7
Federal Reserve Bank of: Chicago

## Filings received during the week ending February 22, 2014

|Filer             | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|CNB CORPORATION   | CIC           | Rick A. Tromble and Michele L. Tromble, individually and as trustees of the Rick A. Tromble Revocable Living Trust and the Michele L. Tromble Revocable Living Trust, both of  Cheboygan, Michigan, to retain ten percent or more of the outstanding voting stock and thereby control of CNB Corporation, Cheboygan, Michigan. CNB Corporation controls Citizens National Bank of Cheboygan, a national banking association, also of Cheboygan, Michigan. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:03/13/2014
|Newspaper:        | Not available
|Federal Register: | 03/13/2014   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Second Quarter of 2014 (April 1, 2014 - June 30, 2014)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta

Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT
      32.2





**Certification
      Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.**§ **1350)**




The
      undersigned, as the chief financial
      officer of PAB Bankshares, Inc., certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that
      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, which
      accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
      in
      the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of PAB Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and
      for
      the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall
      not be relied upon for any other purpose.





Dated
      this 9th day of August,
      2007.








*/s/**Donald****J.****Torbert**,**Jr.*Donald J. Torbert,
                Jr.Executive
                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      PAB Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by PAB Bankshares, Inc. and furnished
      to the SEC or its staff upon request.
`[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 21, 1995 (84), Para 84.6 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1024]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.84.6  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. OBEY:

       Page 19, after line 12, insert the following new section:
       Sec. 126. The amounts otherwise provided in this Act for 
     the following accounts are hereby reduced by the following 
     amounts:
       (1) ``Military Construction, Army'', aggregate amount, 
     $14,000,000.
       (2) ``Military Construction, Navy'', aggregate amount, 
     $9,500,000.
       (3) ``Military Construction, Army National Guard'', 
     $13,200,000.
       (4) ``Military Construction, Air National Guard'', 
     $11,000,000.
       (5) ``Military Construction, Air Force Reserve'', 
     $1,800,000.

It was decided in the

Yeas

163

<3-line {>

negative

Nays

258`
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0670 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Elaine Hartel 

Address: 

Ossining, NY, 

General Comment 

Please keep the interim final rules under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health 

Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (Doc. ID EBSA-2000010-0409) 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: May 03, 2010 

Received: May 01, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ae504e 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 5/3/2010
#### Sarah J. Uline, *Respondent, v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, *Appellants*.

Judgment and order reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Landon, J., and by Learned, P. J., dissenting.
JAMES A. TWAITE 

140 CORKEY’S ROAD 

ROWLAND , PENNSYLVANIA 18457 

_______________________________________________________________ 

Comments Regarding Regulatory Guidance USCG-2007-27022 

page 19157, II B specific areas 1 and 4

 

I am a psychologist who provides neurofeedback treatment to individuals with Attention 

Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Mood Disorders. Neurofeedback is an empirically validated 

and widely recognized effective non-medication treatment for ADHD, as well as other 

conditions. There are over 50 studies evaluating the effectiveness of neurofeedback in the 

treatment of ADHD, substance use disorders and Autism. A recent review of this literature 

concluded "Neurofeedback meets the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 

criteria for Clinical Guidelines for treatment of ADHD." This means that neurofeedback meets 

the same criteria as medication for treating ADHD, of which 60% of prescriptions are in fact 

prescribed "off label," and that neurofeedback "should always be considered as an 

intervention for this disorder by the clinician." 

 

This service has been denied by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, United Behavioral Health, Blue 

Cross, Cigna, and Amerigroup. 

 

This is limitation of an effective and validated treatment for a mental health problem. The 

reasons given by the insurance companies for this denial fell into two categories: 1) our 

company does not cover biofeedback for mental health problems or 2) there is not yet 

sufficient evidence for the efficacy of neurofeedback. As such, they are using evidence-based 

criteria that are far more restrictive for mental health services than the criteria which are 

used for medical/surgical services. There are many routine medical and surgical procedures 

which have far fewer controlled studies about their efficacy than does neurofeedback. These 

medical and surgical procedures are generally not limited because of concerns about how 

many controlled studies have been performed about them. 

 We believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity statute should 

require that employers and plans pay for the same range and scope of services for behavioral 

treatments as they do for medical surgical benefits and that a plan cannot be more restrictive 

in their managed care criteria and reviews for mental health and substance abuse disorders 

when compared to medical surgery. Today plans are being more restrictive in how they 

review evidenced-based mental health and Substance Abuse Treatments when compared to 

medical surgical treatments. This violates both the intent and letter of the parity statute and 

we hope that the regulations will clarify that this can't continue. 

Sincerely, 
Anya Luchow PhD
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, October 12, 1995 (127), Para 127.23 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1514]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.127.23  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. BROWN of 
California:

       Page 133, line 5, strike subparagraph (A).
       Page 133, lines 6 and 7, redesignate subparagraphs (B) and 
     (C) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively.

It was decided in the

Yeas

189

negative

Nays

219
```
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350)





The undersigned, as the chief executive officer of PAB Bankshares, Inc., certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PAB Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.





Dated this 10th day of November, 2010.





/s/ Donald J. Torbert, Jr.Donald J. Torbert, Jr.

President and Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PAB Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by PAB Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
-----Original Message----- 

From: badger5@operamail.com [mailto:badger5@operamail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:59 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Felicia Williams 

4201 Mass. Ave. NW, #175 

Washington, DC 20016