alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 10.4

                 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - DEAN JULIA



                        ACE MARKETING & PROMOTIONS, INC.
                               457 ROCKAWAY AVENUE
                             VALLEY STREAM, NY 11581
                                 (516) 256-7766


                                December 28, 2005


To:      Dean L. Julia

         This is to confirm that in lieu of the provisions of paragraph 6(ii) of
your employment contract dated March 1, 2005, you have agreed to accept an
immediate grant of Non-Statutory Stock Options to purchase 200,000 shares of the
Corporation's Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.20 per share, exercisable
from the Vesting Date as herein defined through December 28, 2015. On December
28, 2005 and on December 28, 2008, Options to purchase 100,000 shares shall vest
on each of the foregoing dates and each date shall be considered a "Vesting
Date." It is understood that in the event you terminate your employment with the
Corporation prior to December 28, 2008, you shall not be entitled to retain any
unvested Options. It is agreed that the following sentence shall be added to
paragraph 6(ii) of your employment contract: "The Board of Directors or a
Compensation Committee thereof shall have the right in its sole discretion to
grant Julia additional Options or other securities and other forms of
compensation at any time in the future."

                                               Very truly yours,

                                               ACE MARKETING & PROMOTIONS, INC.

                                               /s/ Michael D. Trepeta, President
                                               ---------------------------------

Agreed to and accepted by:

/s/ Dean L. Julia
---------------------------------
-----Original Message----- 

From: marydhall@comcast.net [mailto:marydhall@comcast.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 1:30 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

mary joyce 

1056 hollywood ave 

salt lake city, UT 84105
Exhibit 32 (2)

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steven V. Lant, Chief Executive Officer of CH Energy Group, Inc. and Chief
Executive Officer of Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation (the
"Companies"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Companies for the period ending
      December 31, 2003 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

2.    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Companies.

                                             CH ENERGY GROUP, INC.
                                                 (Registrant)

                             By:              /s/ Steven V. Lant
                                 --------------------------------------------
                                                  Steven V. Lant
                                              Chief Executive Officer

                             CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION
                                           (Co-Registrant)

                             By:             /s/ Steven V. Lant
                                 --------------------------------------------
                                                 Steven V. Lant
                                             Chief Executive Officer

Dated: January 30, 2004
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 8, 2016

NO. 03

- 14

- 00489

- CR

April Faulkner, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 7 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUST ICES GOODWIN AND BOU RLAND

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the reco rd and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudicati on of costs

is made.
EXHIBIT 31(i) (2)SENIOR VICE-PRESIDENT AND CFO (PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER)
PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT
RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)I, Robert E. Fowler, Senior Vice-President and CFO of Church Loans & Investments Trust certify that:1.I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Church Loans & Investments Trust;2.Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;4.The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual Report is being prepared;(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report based on such evaluation; and(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and5.The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Trust Managers:(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.DATED:  June 26, 2007/s/ Robert E. Fowler                                                    .Robert E. Fowler, Senior Vice President and CFO
Exhibit 32



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, David H. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Thomas L.. Redding, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David H. GillDavid H. Gill, President and C.E.O.(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Thomas L. ReddingThomas L. Redding C.F.O.(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




August 5, 2005
-----Original Message----- 

From: mark@markleelaw.com [mailto:mark@markleelaw.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 8:58 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Mark Lee 

16307 Spotted Eagle 

Leander, TX 78641
§ 21.21 Effect on other regulations, forms, and instructions. ( a ) *Effect on other regulations.* All regulations, orders, or like directions issued before the effective date of this part by any officer of the Department which impose requirements designed to prohibit any discrimination against individuals on the grounds of race, color, or national origin under any program to which this part applies, and which authorize the suspension or termination of or refusal to grant or to continue Federal financial assistance to any applicant for a recipient of such assistance for failure to comply with such requirements, are hereby superseded to the extent that such discrimination is prohibited by this part, except that nothing in this part may be considered to relieve any person of any obligation assumed or imposed under any such superseded regulation, order, instruction, or like direction before the effective date of this part. Nothing in this part, however, supersedes any of the following (including future amendments thereof): ( 1 ) Executive Order 11246 (3 CFR, 1965 Supp., p. 167) and regulations issued thereunder or
( 2 ) any other orders, regulations, or instructions, insofar as such orders, regulations, or instructions prohibit discrimination on the ground of race, color, or national origin in any program or situation to which this part is inapplicable, or prohibit discrimination on any other ground.
( b ) *Forms and instructions.* The Secretary shall issue and promptly make available to all interested persons forms and detailed instructions and procedures for effectuating this part as applied to programs to which this part applies and for which he is responsible.
( c ) *Supervision and coordination.* The Secretary may from time to time assign to officials of the Department, or to officials of other departments or agencies of the Government with the consent of such departments or agencies, responsibilities in connection with the effectuation of the purposes of title VI of the Act and this part (other than responsibility for final decision as provided in § 21.17), including the achievement of effective coordination and maximum uniformity within the Department and within the Executive Branch of the Government in the application of title VI and this part to similar programs and in similar situations. Any action taken, determination made or requirement imposed by an official of another department or agency acting pursuant to an assignment of responsibility under this paragraph shall have the same effect as though such action had been taken by the Secretary of this Department.
[35 FR 10080, June 18, 1970, as amended at 68 FR 51389, Aug. 26, 2003]
§ 236.57 Shunt and fouling wires. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, shunt wires and fouling wires hereafter installed or replaced shall consist of at least two discrete conductors, and each shall be of sufficient conductivity and maintained in such condition that the track relay will be in deenergized position, or device that functions as a track relay will be in its most restrictive state, when the circuit is shunted.
( b ) This rule does not apply to shunt wires where track or control circuit is opened by the switch circuit controller.
[49 FR 3383, Jan. 26, 1984]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 223 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 223

    To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit 
     contributions by nonparty multicandidate political committees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Dickey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit 
     contributions by nonparty multicandidate political committees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF CONTRIBUTIONS BY NONPARTY MULTICANDIDATE 
              POLITICAL COMMITTEES IN ELECTIONS FOR FEDERAL OFFICE.

    Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 
441a) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, no 
nonparty multicandidate political committee may make any contribution 
to a candidate for Federal office.
    ``(2) As used in this subsection, the term `multicandidate 
political committee' has the meaning given that term in subsection 
(a)(4).''.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 195

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.206 Material inspection.

No pipe or other component may be installed in a pipeline system unless it has been visually inspected at the site of installation to ensure that it is not damaged in a manner that could impair its strength or reduce its serviceability.
#### Elias Stone, Appellant, v. Franklin Insurance Company, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
-----Original Message----- 

From: kjmjat@aol.com [mailto:kjmjat@aol.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 9:24 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I have seen how difficult it is to recognize that you need help with 

mental illness. It is heartbreaking to see someone stop seeking help 

because of the cost of mental health treatment. 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jo Toland 

58 Prospect Terrace 

Montgomery, NY 12549
OMB Control No. 2060-0336

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL OPERATING PERMIT, 40 CFR PART 71

FORM EMISS - EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS

 INSTRUCTIONS: Use this form to calculate potential to emit (PTE) for applicability purposes and actual emissions for fee purposes for each 

emissions unit, control device, or alternative operating scenario identified in section I of form GIS. If form FEE does not need to be 

submitted with the application, do not calculate actual emissions.

A. Emissions Unit ID 

Unit 3 (1 of 2)

B. Identification and Quantification of Emissions

 Instructions: First, list each air pollutant that is either regulated at the unit or present in major amounts. Second, list any other regulated pollutant (for fee 

calculation) emitted at the unit that have not already been listed. Each HAP added to the list in this step may be simply listed as "HAP". 

Next, calculate PTE for applicability purposes and actual emissions for fee purposes for each listed air pollutant. Do not calculate PTE for air 

pollutants listed solely for fee purposes. Include all fugitives, including those that do not count towards applicability, when calculating actual 

emissions. At a minimum, round to the nearest tenth of a ton for yearly values or tenth of a pound for hourly values. Attach examples of 

calculations that illustrates the methodology used. 

 

 Air Pollutants (including regulated air pollutants and

pollutants for which the source is major)

Emission Rates CAS No.

Actual

Annual

Emissions

(tons/yr)

Potential to Emit

Hourly

(lb/hr)

Annual

(tons/yr)

PM/PM10/PM2.5 0.5775 2.53

HCl/CL2 0.9340 4.09

NOx NA 4.0

CO 2.31 6.6

SO2 NA 7.7

VOM 8.0 0.90

Hg 0.0026 0.00114 7439-97-6

As 0.0018 0.0081 7440-38-2

Be 0.0018 0.0081 7440-41-7

Cd 0.0046 0.0202 7440-43-9

Cr 0.0018 0.0081 7440-47-3

Sb 0.0000342 0.000015 7440-31-5
SANITIZED DNW - 5500 GPC ANAL

YSIS
§ 227.205 Storage facilities for EEBAs. ( a ) A railroad may not use a locomotive if it is part of an in-service freight train transporting a PIH material, including a residue of a PIH material, and the locomotive cab is occupied by an employee identified in § 227.201(a)(1)(i)(A) through (D) (subject employee), unless the locomotive cab has appropriate storage facilities to hold the number of EEBAs required to be provided.
( b ) The storage facility for each required EEBA must— ( 1 ) Prevent deformation of the face piece and exhalation valve, where applicable;
( 2 ) Protect the EEBA from incidental damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals;
( 3 ) Provide each subject employee located in the locomotive cab with ready access to the EEBA during an emergency; and
( 4 ) Provide a means for each subject employee to locate the EEBA under adverse conditions such as darkness or disorientation.
( c ) A railroad must comply with the applicable manufacturer's instructions for storage of each required EEBA and must keep a copy of the instructions at its system headquarters for FRA inspection.
**Exhibit 99.1**

CERTIFICATION

 

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,that:

 

(1) The accompanying Quarterly Report onForm 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2003, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) The information contained in the accompanyingReport fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Date: March 11, 2003             |                                      |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                             |                                      |
|                             |                                      |
| /s/  Joseph  C. Christenson |                                      | /s/  Timothy  C. Clayton |   |
| Joseph C. ChristensonPresident   | Timothy C. ClaytonChief Financial Officer |
|                                  |                                           |  |  |

 

 

----
§ 213.339 Inspection of rail in service. ( a ) A continuous search for internal defects shall be made of all rail in track at least twice annually with not less than 120 days between inspections.
( b ) Inspection equipment shall be capable of detecting defects between joint bars, in the area enclosed by joint bars.
( c ) Each defective rail shall be marked with a highly visible marking on both sides of the web and base.
( d ) If the person assigned to operate the rail defect detection equipment being used determines that, due to rail surface conditions, a valid search for internal defects could not be made over a particular length of track, the test on that particular length of track cannot be considered as a search for internal defects under § 213.337(a).
( e ) If a valid search for internal defects cannot be conducted for reasons described in paragraph (d) of this section, the track owner shall, before the expiration of time limits— ( 1 ) Conduct a valid search for internal defects;
( 2 ) Reduce operating speed to a maximum of 25 miles per hour until such time as a valid search for internal defects can be made; or
( 3 ) Remove the rail from service.
1 

### Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Kelly, Shaheerah

Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 6:25 AM

To: Dwight Mallory

Cc: Patrick Flynn; Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: NHPA Compliance / Area of Potential Effects for MCU Project

Dwight,

EPA spoke to the THPO yesterday concerning the area of potential effects (APE) for the MCU Main Flare. The EPA and

THPO agreed that the APE for this project should be a 2 km (1.2 mi) radius around the Main Flare. The THPO

recommended that the assessment of historic properties within the APE also identify residential homes and determine

whether these homes are historic properties as defined in 36 CFR Part 800. In general, the assessment must include the

information delineated in 36 CFR 800.4 and 800.5 (e.g. identify the APE and the historic properties potentially affected

by the undertaking; if there are historic properties, assess the undertaking’s effects on these properties including any

visual, atmospheric or audible elements that diminish the integrity of historic properties within the APE, and, if needed,

seek ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse effects on historic properties).

Please contact me if you have any questions.

************************************

Shaheerah Kelly

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3)

U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency, Region 9

San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: 415-947-4156

Fax: 415-947-3579

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 6, 1995 (110), Para 110.9 Subpoena]
[Page 1302]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.110.9  subpoena

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, laid before the House a 
communication, which was read as follows:

                                     House of Representatives,

                                  Washington, DC, August 11, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC.

       Dear Mr. Speaker: This is to notify you formally, pursuant 
     to Rule L (50) of the Rules of the House that my office has 
     been served with a subpoena for the production of documents 
     by the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for 
     Lancaster County in connection with a civil case.
       After consultation with the office of the General Counsel, 
     I will determine whether compliance with the subpoena is 
     consistent with the privileges and precedents of the House.
           Cordially,
                                                 Robert S. Walker.
```