alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 52004IP0021(01) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52004IP0021(01)

**European Parliament resolution on the procedures for ratification of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and a communication strategy for the said Treaty **

*
Official Journal 166 E , 07/07/2005 P. 0057 - 0058 *

P6_TA(2004)0021

Ratification procedures of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and the communication strategy

European Parliament resolution on the procedures for ratification of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and a communication strategy for the said Treaty

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, to which the Heads of State or Government of the Member States of the European Union gave their agreement on 18 June 2004 [1] at the Intergovernmental Conference, on the basis of the text drawn up by the European Convention, and which is due to be signed in Rome on 29 October 2004,

- having regard to Rule 108(5) of the Rules of Procedure,

A. whereas the agreement reached on 18 June 2004 is of historical significance and constitutes the first major political act of the enlarged European Union, laying the foundations for a renewed Union based on increased democracy, transparency and efficiency,

B. whereas, in 2005, 60 years after the end of the Second World War and 16 years after the end of the division of Europe, our continent is reconciled in an order of peace and freedom, based on ever closer economic and political integration, of which the European Communities, and subsequently the Union and their successive enlargements, have been the driving force,

C. whereas the Constitution should be presented to Europe's citizens in as clear, fair and understandable a way as possible, clearly emphasising the elements already in force and stressing the new provisions,

1. Will deliver its opinion on the constitutional Treaty as soon as possible after it has been signed;

2. Calls on the Council to devise a coordinated approach to the timetabling of national ratification procedures and to share best practice in terms of parliamentary scrutiny and referendum campaigning;

3. Suggests that the period from 5 to 8 May 2005 might be chosen as a suitable period for holding the planned referenda on the Constitution or the parliamentary ratification in the Member States, as this period would be of symbolic value, both for peace on our continent and for European integration;

4. Suggests that the ratification process in all Member States should be accomplished by June 2006;

5. Deems it essential to emphasise the European dimension of the draft Constitution in the national ratification procedures in order to increase a shared sense of civic community across the Union;

6. Calls on the Council and the Commission to draw up an appropriate campaign and communication strategy; declares its willingness to contribute to this strategy;

7. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

[1] Document CIG 87/04.

--------------------------------------------------
March 10, 2015 

Mr. Christian Amico 

1985 Riviera Drive, 103 

Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 

Dear Mr. Amico: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request 

We entered your March 5, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

0557), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MOHAMMED ABDUL RAHMAN KHAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 332 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of October, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Editorial Note on Part 190
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 190 appear at 78 FR 58908, Sept. 25, 2013.

§ 190.213 Final order. ( a ) In an enforcement proceeding commenced under § 190.207, an attorney from the Office of Chief Counsel prepares a recommended decision after expiration of the 30-day response period prescribed in § 190.208. If a hearing is held, the Presiding Official prepares the recommended decision as set forth in § 190.211. The recommended decision is forwarded to the Associate Administrator who considers the case file and issues a final order. The final order includes— ( 1 ) A statement of findings and determinations on all material issues, including a determination as to whether each alleged violation has been proved;
( 2 ) If a civil penalty is assessed, the amount of the penalty and the procedures for payment of the penalty, provided that the assessed civil penalty may not exceed the penalty proposed in the notice of probable violation; and
( 3 ) If a compliance order is issued, a statement of the actions required to be taken by the respondent and the time by which such actions must be accomplished.
( b ) In cases where a substantial delay is expected in the issuance of a final order, notice of that fact and the date by which it is expected that action will be taken is provided to the respondent upon request and whenever practicable.
[Amdt. 190-16, 78 FR 58911, Sept. 25, 2013]
#### § 22.29 DOT access to participating lenders files.

A Participating Lender must allow the authorized representatives of DOT OSDBU, as well as representatives of the Office of Inspector General (OIG) and General Accountability Office (GAO), access to its STLP loan files to review, inspect, and copy all records and documents pertaining to DOT OSDBU guaranteed loans. Record retention of all relevant documents and other materials is specified in the cooperative agreement between DOT OSDBU and the Participating Lender.
<PAGE>



                                   EXHIBIT 23
                                   ----------

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) of Champion
Industries, Inc. of our report dated January 23, 1998, except for Note 10, as
to which the date is March 2, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Champion Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended
October 31, 1997.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan (Form S-8, No. 33-76790) of
Champion Industries, Inc. of our report dated January 23, 1998, except for
Note 10, as to which the date is March 2, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Champion Industries, Inc. and
Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended
October 31, 1997.

                                                  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Charleston, West Virginia
March 21, 1998
`[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 27, 1995 (103), Para 103.21 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1210]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.103.21  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. HEFLEY:

       On page 30, line 15 strike ``951,988,000'' and insert 
     ``839,183,000''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

184

<3-line {>

negative

Nays

239`
-----Original Message----- 

From: cassoulet@ymail.com [mailto:cassoulet@ymail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:16 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Paul Drowns 

66 Monroe Hwy 

Brooks, ME 04921
-----Original Message----- 

From: stevedonoso@yahoo.com [mailto:stevedonoso@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 4:28 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

steve donoso 

P.O. Box 437 

Rockland, ME 4841
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1999
<CASH>                                           1,179
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,416
<ALLOWANCES>                                       643
<INVENTORY>                                     75,751
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               157,126
<PP&E>                                          83,972
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,085
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 318,240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,089
<BONDS>                                        136,136
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,868
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           191
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   318,240
<SALES>                                        328,948
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               328,948
<CGS>                                          222,555
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  311,548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (54)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,371
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (905)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,527
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,432)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   3,500
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,932)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)
        

</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: maappleman@klru.org [mailto:maappleman@klru.org] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:43 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher co-payments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Mary Alice Appleman 

2410 Havenside Drive 

Austin, TX 78704
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 10, 1995 (125), Para 125.20 Subpoena]
[Page 1498]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.125.20  subpoena

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, laid before the House a 
communication, which was read as follows:

         House of Representatives, Office of the Chief 
           Administrative Officer,
                                  Washington, DC, October 4, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     Speaker, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
     Re Wright v. Wright

       Dear Mr. Speaker: This is to formally notify you pursuant 
     to Rule L (50) of the Rules of the House that my Office has 
     been served with a subpoena issued by the Superior Court of 
     the District of Columbia.
       After consultation with the General Counsel, I have 
     determined that compliance with the subpoena is consistent 
     with the privileges and precedents of the House.
           Sincerely,
                                                 Scot M. Faulkner,
                                     Chief Administrative Officer.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 21, 1995 (119), Para 119.13 Motion to Instruct Conferees--H.R. 1530]
[Page 1446]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.119.13  motion to instruct conferees--h.r. 1530

  Mr. DELLUMS moved that the managers on the part of the House at the 
conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on H.R. 1530, be 
instructed to insist upon amounts for authorization of appropriations 
for Operations and Maintenance accounts such that the total amount of 
such authorizations is not less than the total amount authorized for 
Operation and Maintenance accounts in section 301 of the House bill.
  After debate,
  By unanimous consent, the previous question was ordered on the motion 
to instruct the managers on the part of the House.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House agree to said motion?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LINDER, announced that the yeas had it.
  Mr. DELLUMS objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  A quorum not being present,
  The roll was called under clause 4, rule XV, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

Yeas

415

When there appeared

Nays

2
```
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 51168          Scale: 100,000          Edition: 2          Edition Date: 25-JUN-94          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1994/31**Notice ListingOCVLeftIndex-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Paulson Capital Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Chester L.F. Paulson, President, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Chester L.F. Paulson |
|---------------------------|
| Chester  L.F. Paulson     |
| President                 |
| November  12, 2004        |

 

 

 

----

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, W. Douglas Parker, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of America West Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) and Derek J. Kerr, the Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:
1.  The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, to whichthis certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2.  The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 25th day of April 2005.    /s/ W. Douglas Parker      W. Douglas Parker Chief Executive Officer    /s/ Derek J. Kerr      Derek J. Kerr Chief Financial Officer
-----Original Message----- 

From: mandaoverstreet@yahoo.com [mailto:mandaoverstreet@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 2:45 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Angela Overstreet 

1712 Brighton Rd. 

Pittsburgh, PA 15212
-----Original Message----- 

From: juliandco@gmail.com [mailto:juliandco@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:14 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Julie Gottschalk 

718 Rockland Ave. 

charlottesville, VA 22902
From: ben_gamble@yahoo.com [mailto:ben_gamble@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:40 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Benjamin Sullivan 

2717 Colt Run Rd 

Oakton, VA 22124
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

November 13, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00651-CV

BACM 2006-4 PARK ROW, LLC, Appellant

V.

EZRA BEYMAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 164th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-55621

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 14, 2014. On November 3, 

2014, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The 

motion is granted. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison and Donovan.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE RANDERS
GROUP  INCORPORATED  QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 28,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                APR-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                    807
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          11,456
<ALLOWANCES>                              428
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       25,186
<PP&E>                                 12,205
<DEPRECIATION>                          3,103
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         76,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   7,444
<BONDS>                                 1,232
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                   13
<OTHER-SE>                             65,950
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           76,744
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       16,844
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          12,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        2,921
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         1,568
<INCOME-TAX>                              727
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       841
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              841
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.01
        

</TABLE>