alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 178.348-5 Pressure and leakage test. ( a ) Each cargo tank must be tested in accordance with § 178.345-13 and this section.
( b ) Pressure test. Test pressure must be as follows: ( 1 ) Using the hydrostatic test method, the test pressure must be at least 1.5 times MAWP.
( 2 ) Using the pneumatic test method, the test pressure must be at least 1.5 times tank MAWP, and the inspection pressure is tank MAWP.
[Amdt. 178-89, 54 FR 25032, June 12, 1989. Redesignated by Amdt. 178-112, 61 FR 18934, Apr. 29, 1996]
-----Original Message----- 

From: wendyswords@hotmail.com [mailto:wendyswords@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:14 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

wendy gauthier 

8812 glider ave. 

los angeles, CA 90045
-----Original Message----- 

From: drmariah@earthlink.net [mailto:drmariah@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 12:43 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

mariah larkin 

1235 Sanchez Street 

san Francisco, CA 94114
§ 221.9 Waivers. ( a ) A railroad may petition the Federal Railroad Administrator for a waiver of compliance with any requirement prescribed in this part.
( b ) Each petition for a waiver under this section must be filed in the manner and contain the information required by part 211 of this chapter.
( c ) If the Administrator finds that a waiver of compliance is in the public interest and is consistent with railroad safety, he may grant the waiver subject to any condition he deems necessary. Notice of each waiver granted, including a statement of the reasons therefor, will be published in the Federal Register.
-----Original Message----- 

From: harrycgregory@gmail.com [mailto:harrycgregory@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 4:16 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Harry Gregory 

170 Argent Way 

Bluffton, SC 29909
p. 1



# OAR Box 1190 Prepped byCandice Davis



### Document

Number: 

# 67 ) ll-C- 1 Docket Number: 

# A-90-2 8

Printed 5/5/20089:13:51 AM

Sheet 67 of 106*

•A^ UNITE D STATES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y 

### f^2|2£ J WASHINGTON , D:C . 2046 0 MA Y2 2 1995

OFFIC E O f AI R AN O RADIATIO N Mr . Pau l T . Haluza , Directo r Governmen t Relation s an d Publi c Affair s Moto r & Equipmen t Manufactuer s Associatio n 1 3 2 5 Pennsylvani a Avenue , N.W . Washington , D.C . 2000 4 Dea r Mr . Haluza : I'understand tha t th e Moto r & Equipmen t Associatio n(MEMA ) ha s decide d no t t o contes t Protectio nAgency' s (EPA ) Direc t Fina l Rul e revising fede?a° ! boar d diagnostic s regulations , excep t regarding the updat e o f tha t portio no f th e federa l rul e whic hallow s optiona l complianc e wit hprocedure s consisten t wit hCalifornia' s OBD I I regulations . Becaus e n o othe r part ysubmitte d advers e commen t o nth e remainde r o f th e direc t fina l rule , EP Awil l b e abl e t o continu e to.certif y vehicle s fo r th e 199 6 mode l year . A s a resul t o f MEMA' s actions , EPAintend s t o withdra wth e direc t fina l rul e wit hregar d t o th e adoptio no f revision s t o th e optiona l OB D I I requirements . EPAintend s t o propos e withi nth e nex t 3 0 t o 6 0 day s a notic e o f propose d rulemaking tha t wil l solici t commen t o nthe issu e o f allowing optiona l complianc e wit h procedure s consisten t wit hCalifornia' s revise d OB D I I requirements . I naddition , EPAexpect s t o receiv e withi nth e nex t tw o month s California' s revise d reques t fo r a waive r o f federa l preemptio nfo r it s OB D I I regulations , las t amende d i nDecembe r o f 1994 . EP Ai s encouraging th e Californi a Ai r Resource s Boar d t o send it s reques t fo r a waive r t o EPAa s quickl ya s possible . EP Aintend s t o publis ha Notic e o f Opportunit yfo r Publi c Hearin g and Publi c Commen t regarding tha t reques t withi n3 0 t o 6 0 day s o f receip t o f CARB' s request . , I f yo u hav e an

yquestion s abou t this , matter , pleas e contac t Todd Sherwoo d o f m ystaf f a t (313 ) .668-4405 .

Sincerely ,

Mobil e Source s

Recycled/Recyclabl e .Printe d wit h Vegetabl e Oi l Based Ink s o n 100 % Recyde d Pape r(40 % Postconsumer )
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Biovest International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher Kyriakides, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                                                      /s/ Christopher Kyriakides
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Christopher Kyriakides
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                                      January 9, 2003
#### Henry R. Wilson, Respondent, *v.*Wyckoff, Church & Partridge, Appellant.

*Wilson*v. *Wyckoff, Church & Partridge,*133 App. Div. 92, affirmed.

(Argued December 8, 1910;

decided January 3, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June *56222, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract.

*S. S. Slater*and *Frederick S. Randall*for appellant.

*J. Frederick Eagle*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Hiscock and Collin, JJ. Absent: Werner, J.
-----Original Message----- 

From: grrrrrr974@aol.com [mailto:grrrrrr974@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:47 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Marty McCormick 

561 Holly Dr. 

Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350)





The undersigned, as the chief executive officer of PAB Bankshares, Inc., certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PAB Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.





Dated this 11th day of May, 2010.





/s/ Donald J. Torbert, Jr.Donald J. Torbert, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PAB Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by PAB Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
39–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–238 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT 

TO THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES COMMITTEE 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 468] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 468, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any resolution reported on the legislative day of September 29, 2005, providing for 

consideration or disposition of a conference report to accompany the 

bill (H.R. 2360) making appropriations for the Department of 

Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, 

and for other purposes. 

Æ
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 28, 1995 (122), Para 122.12 Recess--1:59 P.M.]
[Page 1462]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.122.12  recess--1:59 p.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. DREIER, pursuant to clause 12 of rule I, 
declared the House in recess at 1 o'clock and 59 minutes p.m., subject 
to the call of the Chair until 3:00 p.m.
```
**UNITED STA TES OF AMERICA**  **DEPA RTMENT OF TRA**  **NSPORTA TION**  **FEDERA L**  **AV IA** **TION A DMINISTRA**  **TION**

**WA SHINGTON, DC**  **September 20, 2015**
**Regulatory**

**Docket No. _______________**

**IN THE MA TTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF:**  **AR GISHTI ZA**  **MA NYAN**  **FOR A N EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF**  **TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERA L REGULA** **TIONS SECTIONS**  **45.23(b), 61.101(e)(4), & (5)**  **, 61.113(a) & (b)**  **, 61.133 (a)**  **, 61.23(a) & (c)**  **, 91.7(a**  **), 91.9(b)(2)**  **, 91.109(a), 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.203(a) & (b), 91.405(a),**  **91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIA**  **L OPERA**  **TION OF**  **DJI PHA**  **NTOM 3**  **UNMA NNED A**  **IRCRA FT SYSTEMS**  **PURSUA NT TO SECTION 333 OF**  **THE FAA MODERNIZA TION**  **AND REFORM AC**  **T OF 2012 (PUBLIC LA W 112**  **- 95)** 
**Ar gishti Zamany**  **an 1436**  **Glenoaks Blvd #129 Glendale, CA** 

**91201**
-----Original Message----- 

From: beercityboyz@beercity.com [mailto:beercityboyz@beercity.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:50 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Mike Beer 

pob 26035 

Milwaukee, WI 53226
-----Original Message----- 

From: joan1161@mac.com [mailto:joan1161@mac.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 6:47 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Joan Matson 

1161 Turquoise Way 

El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
#### Julia Stevens, Respondent, *v.*Empire State Degree of Honor, Appellant.

*Stevens*v. *Empire State Degree of Honor,*128 App. Div. 915, affirmed.

(Argued October 26, 1910;

decided November 15, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 30, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover upon a policy of life insurance.

*Glare A. Picka/rd*for appellant.

*Warren J. Gheney*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Collin, JJ.
§ 179.3 Procedure for securing approval. ( a ) Application for approval of designs, materials and construction, conversion or alteration of tank car tanks under these specifications, complete with detailed prints, must be submitted in prescribed form to the Executive Director—Tank Car Safety, AAR, for consideration by its Tank Car Committee and other appropriate committees. Approval or rejections of applications based on appropriate committee action will be issued by the executive director.
( b ) When, in the opinion of the Committee, such tanks or equipment are in compliance with the requirements of this subchapter, the application will be approved.
( c ) When such tanks or equipment are not in compliance with the requirements of this subchapter, the Committee may recommend service trials to determine the merits of a change in specifications. Such service trials may be conducted only if the builder or shipper applies for and obtains a special permit.
[29 FR 18995, Dec. 29, 1964. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967 and amended by Amdt. 179-41, 52 FR 36672, Sept. 30, 1987; 63 FR 52850, Oct. 1, 1998; 68 FR 48571, Aug. 14, 2003; 70 FR 73166, Dec. 9, 2005]
§ 220.311 Railroad operating employees in deadhead status. ( a ) Notwithstanding any other restrictions in this subpart, a railroad operating employee who is in deadhead status and not inside the cab of a controlling locomotive may use an electronic device only if the employee is not using the device in such a way that interferes with any railroad operating employee's personal safety or performance of safety-related duties.
( b ) A railroad operating employee who is in deadhead status and located inside the cab of a controlling locomotive must have each electronic device turned off with any earpiece removed from the ear— ( 1 ) When on a moving train;
( 2 ) When any member of the crew is— ( i ) On the ground, or
( ii ) Riding rolling equipment during a switching operation; or
( 3 ) When any railroad employee is assisting in preparation of the train for movement.
§ 198.39 Qualifications for operation of one-call notification system. A one-call notification system qualifies to operate under this subpart if it complies with the following: ( a ) It is operated by one or more of the following: ( 1 ) A person who operates underground pipeline facilities or other underground facilities.
( 2 ) A private contractor.
( 3 ) A State or local government agency.
( 4 ) A person who is otherwise eligible under State law to operate a one-call notification system.
( b ) It receives and records information from excavators about intended excavation activities.
( c ) It promptly transmits to the appropriate operators of underground pipeline facilities the information received from excavators about intended excavation activities.
( d ) It maintains a record of each notice of intent to engage in an excavation activity for the minimum time set by the State or, in the absence of such time, for the time specified in the applicable State statute of limitations on tort actions.
( e ) It tells persons giving notice of an intent to engage in an excavation activity the names of participating operators of underground pipeline facilities to whom the notice will be transmitted.
-----Original Message----- 

From: joelong@tds.net [mailto:joelong@tds.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:52 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Joseph Long 

2529 McKenna Blvd. 

Madison, WI 53711
-----Original Message----- 

From: r.cook@q.com [mailto:r.cook@q.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:23 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Rodney Cook 

8247 Latona Ave NE 

Seattle, WA 98115
-----Original Message----- 

From: welteasytime@gmail.com [mailto:welteasytime@gmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:39 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Claire Welt 

1137 SCHILLING WAY 

Mount Shasta, CA 96067
PUBLIC LAW 112–257—JAN. 10, 2013 126 STAT. 2413 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6620: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012): 

Dec. 5, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 28, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–257 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to eliminate certain limitations on the 

length of Secret Service Protection for former Presidents and for the children 

of former Presidents. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Former Presidents Protection 

Act of 2012’’. 

SEC. 2. ELIMINATING CERTAIN LIMITATIONS ON THE LENGTH OF 

SECRET SERVICE PROTECTION FOR FORMER PRESIDENTS 

AND FOR THE CHILDREN OF FORMER PRESIDENTS. 

(a) FORMER PRESIDENTS.—Section 3056(a)(3) of title 18, United 

States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘unless the former President 

did not’’ and all that follows through ‘‘warrant such protection’’. 

(b) CHILDREN OF FORMER PRESIDENTS.—Section 3056(a)(4) of 

title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘for a period’’ 

and all that follows through ‘‘comes first’’. 

Approved January 10, 2013. 

18 USC 1 note. 

Former 

Presidents 

Protection Act of 

2012. 

Jan. 10, 2013 

[H.R. 6620] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, September 12, 1995 (113), Para 113.16 Order of Business--Consideration of H.R. 1594]
[Page 1324]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.113.16  order of business--consideration of h.r. 1594

  On motion of Mr. FAWELL, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That during the consideration of the bill (H.R. 1594) to 
place restrictions on the promotion by the Department of Labor and other 
Federal agencies and instrumentalities of economically targeted 
investments in connection with employee benefit plans, pursuant to House 
Resolution 215, the chairman of the Committe of the Whole may postpone 
until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole 
a request for a recorded vote on any amendment, and that the chairman of 
the Committee of the Whole may reduce to not less than five minutes the 
time for voting by electronic device on any postponed question that 
immediately follows another vote by electronic device without 
intervening business, provided that the time for voting by electronic 
device on the first of any series of questions shall not be less than 15 
minutes.
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Bell Atlantic - West Virginia, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 33-60126) of our
report dated February 9, 1998, on our audits of the financial statements and
financial statement schedule of the Company as of December 31, 1997 and December
31, 1996, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997,
which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

2400 Eleven Penn Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 25, 1998
#### John Grant, Appellant, v. James Keep, Respondent.

Judgment of the County Court and. that of the justice reversed. Opinion by

Bradley, J.