EX-10.1



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
  

 
  

CREDIT AGREEMENT 
 dated as of

 October 8, 2013 
 among

 REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC., 
 as
Borrower, 
 The Lenders Party Hereto 

and 
 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

 as Administrative Agent 
  

 
  

CITIBANK, N.A., 
 as Syndication
Agent, 
 CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, 

FIFTH THIRD BANK, 
 GOLDMAN SACHS
BANK USA, 
 MIZUHO BANK, LTD., 

ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 
 and 

THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 
 as
Documentation Agents, 
 and 

J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, 

CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., 

CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA), LLC, 

FIFTH THIRD BANK, 
 GOLDMAN SACHS
BANK USA, 
 MIZUHO BANK, LTD., 

RBC CAPITAL MARKETS1 

and 
 THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, 

as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners 
  

 
  

 

	1 	RBC Capital Markets is a marketing name for the investment banking activities of Royal Bank of Canada. 








 TABLE OF CONTENTS 
  

					
	 	  	Page	 
	 ARTICLE I Definitions
	  	 	1	  
		
	 SECTION 1.01. Defined Terms
	  	 	1	  
	 SECTION 1.02. Classification of Loans and Borrowings
	  	 	25	  
	 SECTION 1.03. Terms Generally
	  	 	25	  
	 SECTION 1.04. Accounting Terms; GAAP
	  	 	26	  
	 SECTION 1.05. Exchange Rates; Change of Currency
	  	 	26	  
		
	 ARTICLE II The Credits
	  	 	27	  
		
	 SECTION 2.01. Commitments
	  	 	27	  
	 SECTION 2.02. Loans and Borrowings
	  	 	27	  
	 SECTION 2.03. Requests for Revolving Borrowings
	  	 	28	  
	 SECTION 2.04. Swingline Loans
	  	 	28	  
	 SECTION 2.05. Letters of Credit
	  	 	30	  
	 SECTION 2.06. Funding of Borrowings
	  	 	33	  
	 SECTION 2.07. Interest Elections
	  	 	34	  
	 SECTION 2.08. Termination and Reduction of Commitments
	  	 	35	  
	 SECTION 2.09. Repayment of Loans; Evidence of Debt
	  	 	36	  
	 SECTION 2.10. Prepayment of Loans
	  	 	37	  
	 SECTION 2.11. Fees
	  	 	37	  
	 SECTION 2.12. Interest
	  	 	38	  
	 SECTION 2.13. Alternate Rate of Interest
	  	 	39	  
	 SECTION 2.14. Increased Costs
	  	 	40	  
	 SECTION 2.15. Break Funding Payments
	  	 	41	  
	 SECTION 2.16. Withholding of Taxes; Gross-Up
	  	 	41	  
	 SECTION 2.17. Payments Generally; Pro Rata Treatment; Sharing of Set-offs
	  	 	44	  
	 SECTION 2.18. Mitigation Obligations; Replacement of Lenders
	  	 	45	  
	 SECTION 2.19. Defaulting Lenders
	  	 	46	  
	 SECTION 2.20. Incremental Commitments
	  	 	47	  
	 SECTION 2.21. Maturity Date Extensions
	  	 	48	  
		
	 ARTICLE III Representations and Warranties
	  	 	49	  
		
	 SECTION 3.01. Organization; Powers
	  	 	49	  
	 SECTION 3.02. Authorization; Enforceability
	  	 	49	  
	 SECTION 3.03. Governmental Approvals; No Conflicts
	  	 	49	  
	 SECTION 3.04. Financial Condition; No Material Adverse Effect
	  	 	50	  
	 SECTION 3.05. Properties
	  	 	50	  
	 SECTION 3.06. Litigation and Environmental Matters
	  	 	50	  
	 SECTION 3.07. Compliance with Laws and Contractual Obligations
	  	 	50	  
	 SECTION 3.08. Use of Proceeds; Margin Regulations; Investment Company Status
	  	 	51	  
	 SECTION 3.09. Taxes
	  	 	51	  
	 SECTION 3.10. ERISA
	  	 	51	  
	 SECTION 3.11. Disclosure
	  	 	51	  
	 SECTION 3.12. Subsidiaries
	  	 	52	  
	 SECTION 3.13. Anti-Terrorism Law
	  	 	52	  


  
 i 









 TABLE OF CONTENTS 

(continued) 
  


					
	 	  	Page	 
		
	 ARTICLE IV Conditions
	  	 	53	  
		
	 SECTION 4.01. Effective Date
	  	 	53	  
	 SECTION 4.02. Each Credit Event
	  	 	54	  
		
	 ARTICLE V Affirmative Covenants
	  	 	55	  
		
	 SECTION 5.01. Financial Statements; Ratings Change and Other Information
	  	 	55	  
	 SECTION 5.02. Notices of Material Events
	  	 	56	  
	 SECTION 5.03. Existence; Conduct of Business
	  	 	56	  
	 SECTION 5.04. Payment of Obligations
	  	 	56	  
	 SECTION 5.05. Maintenance of Properties; Insurance
	  	 	57	  
	 SECTION 5.06. Books and Records; Inspection Rights
	  	 	57	  
	 SECTION 5.07. Compliance with Laws and Contractual Obligations
	  	 	57	  
	 SECTION 5.08. Use of Proceeds and Letters of Credit
	  	 	57	  
	 SECTION 5.09. Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement; Further Assurances
	  	 	58	  
		
	 ARTICLE VI Negative Covenants
	  	 	58	  
		
	 SECTION 6.01. Liens
	  	 	59	  
	 SECTION 6.02. Sale and Leaseback Transactions
	  	 	60	  
	 SECTION 6.03. Fundamental Changes
	  	 	60	  
	 SECTION 6.04. Financial Condition Covenants
	  	 	61	  
	 SECTION 6.05. Restricted Payments
	  	 	61	  
	 SECTION 6.06. Transactions with Affiliates
	  	 	62	  
	 SECTION 6.07. Restrictive Agreements
	  	 	62	  
	 SECTION 6.08. Subsidiary Indebtedness
	  	 	63	  
	 SECTION 6.09. End of Fiscal Years; Fiscal Quarters
	  	 	64	  
		
	 ARTICLE VII Events of Default
	  	 	64	  
		
	 ARTICLE VIII The Agents
	  	 	66	  
		
	 ARTICLE IX Miscellaneous
	  	 	68	  
		
	 SECTION 9.01. Notices
	  	 	68	  
	 SECTION 9.02. Waivers; Amendments
	  	 	69	  
	 SECTION 9.03. Expenses; Indemnity; Damage Waiver
	  	 	70	  
	 SECTION 9.04. Successors and Assigns
	  	 	72	  
	 SECTION 9.05. Survival
	  	 	75	  
	 SECTION 9.06. Counterparts; Integration; Effectiveness
	  	 	75	  
	 SECTION 9.07. Severability
	  	 	75	  
	 SECTION 9.08. Right of Setoff
	  	 	75	  
	 SECTION 9.09. Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Consent to Service of Process
	  	 	76	  
	 SECTION 9.10. WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL
	  	 	76	  


  
 ii 









 TABLE OF CONTENTS 

(continued) 
  


					
	 	  	Page	 
	 SECTION 9.11. Headings
	  	 	77	  
	 SECTION 9.12. Confidentiality
	  	 	77	  
	 SECTION 9.13. Interest Rate Limitation
	  	 	78	  
	 SECTION 9.14. USA PATRIOT Act
	  	 	78	  
	 SECTION 9.15. No Fiduciary Duty
	  	 	78	  
	 SECTION 9.16. Judgment Currency
	  	 	79	  
	 SECTION 9.17. Release of Subsidiary Guarantors from Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement
	  	 	79	  

  

					
		
	SCHEDULES:	 	
			
	 Schedule 2.01
	 	—	 	 Commitments

	 Schedule 2.05
	 	—	 	 Existing Letters of Credit

	 Schedule 3.06
	 	—	 	 Disclosed Matters

	 Schedule 3.12
	 	—	 	 Subsidiaries

	 Schedule 6.01
	 	—	 	 Existing Liens


  

					
		
	EXHIBITS:	 	
			
	 Exhibit A
	 	—	 	 Form of Assignment and Assumption

	 Exhibit B
	 	—	 	 Form of Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement

	 Exhibit C-1
	 	—	 	 Form of U.S. Tax Certificate (For Non-U.S. Lenders That Are Not Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)

	 Exhibit C-2
	 	—	 	 Form of U.S. Tax Certificate (For Non-U.S. Lenders That Are Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)

	 Exhibit C-3
	 	—	 	 Form of U.S. Tax Certificate (For Non-U.S. Participants That Are Not Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)

	 Exhibit C-4
	 	—	 	 Form of U.S. Tax Certificate (For Non-U.S. Participants That Are Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)

	 Exhibit D
	 	—	 	 Form of Compliance Certificate



  
 iii 








 CREDIT AGREEMENT dated as of October 8, 2013, among REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC.
(the “Borrower”), the LENDERS party hereto, and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Administrative Agent. 
 The
parties hereto agree as follows: 
 ARTICLE I 

Definitions 

SECTION 1.01. Defined Terms. 

As used in this Agreement, the following terms have the meanings specified below: 

“ABR”, when used in reference to any Loan or Borrowing, refers to whether such Loan, or the Loans comprising
such Borrowing, are bearing interest at a rate determined by reference to the Alternate Base Rate. 
 “Additional
Lender” has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 2.20(a). 
 “Adjusted LIBO Rate”
means, with respect to any Eurodollar Borrowing for any Interest Period, an interest rate per annum (rounded upwards, if necessary, to the next 1/100 of 1%) equal to (a) the LIBO Rate for such Interest Period multiplied by (b) the
Statutory Reserve Rate. 
 “Administrative Agent” means JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. in its capacity as
administrative agent for the Lenders under this Agreement and the other Loan Documents and its successors in such capacity. 

“Administrative Questionnaire” means an Administrative Questionnaire in a form supplied by the Administrative
Agent. 
 “Affiliate” means, with respect to a specified Person, another Person that directly, or
indirectly through one or more intermediaries, Controls or is Controlled by or is under common Control with the Person specified. 

“Agreement” means this Credit Agreement, as modified, supplemented, amended, restated (including any
amendment and restatement hereof), extended or renewed from time to time. 
 “Agreement Currency” has the
meaning assigned to such term in Section 9.16. 
 “Alternate Base Rate” means, for any day, a rate per
annum equal to the greatest of (a) the Prime Rate in effect on such day, (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate in effect on such day plus  1⁄2 of
1% and (c) the Adjusted LIBO Rate for a one month Interest Period on such day (or if such day is not a Business Day, the immediately preceding Business Day) plus 1%, provided that, for the avoidance of doubt, the Adjusted LIBO Rate for
any day shall be based on the rate appearing on the Reuters Page LIBOR01 (or on any successor or substitute page of such page) at approximately 11:00 a.m. London time on such day. Any change in the Alternate Base Rate due to a change in the Prime
Rate, the Federal Funds Effective Rate or the Adjusted LIBO Rate shall be effective from and including the effective date of such change in the Prime Rate, the Federal Funds Effective Rate or the Adjusted LIBO Rate, respectively. Each change in the
Prime Rate shall be effective as of the opening of business on the day such change in such Prime Rate occurs. 

  
 1 








 “Anti-Terrorism Laws” has the meaning assigned to such term in
Section 3.13(a). 
 “Applicable Percentage” means, with respect to any Lender, the percentage of the
total Commitments represented by such Lender’s Commitment; provided that (i) in the case of Section 2.19 when a Defaulting Lender shall exist, “Applicable Percentage” shall mean the percentage of the total Commitments
(disregarding any Defaulting Lender’s Commitment) represented by such Lender’s Commitment, and (ii) if all of the Commitments have terminated or expired, the “Applicable Percentage” shall be determined based upon the
percentage of the aggregate Revolving Credit Exposures (in the case of a determination pursuant to Section 2.19 when a Defaulting Lender shall exist, disregarding any Defaulting Lender’s Revolving Credit Exposure) represented by such
Lender’s individual Revolving Credit Exposure. On the date of (x) any termination of the Commitments of one or more Lenders pursuant to Section 2.08(b) on a Maturity Date that is not also the Final Maturity Date and (y) the
termination of the Commitment of any Non-Continuing Lender pursuant to Section 2.08(d), the Applicable Percentages of the Lenders shall be automatically adjusted to give effect to the termination of such Commitment(s); provided that, in
the case of any termination described in clause (x), if an Event of Default exists under clause (a), (b), (h) or (i) of Article VII on such date of termination, no such adjustment shall be made and the Applicable Percentage shall be
determined as provided in clause (ii) of the proviso contained in the immediately preceding sentence as if all Commitments had then terminated. 

“Applicable Rate” means, for any day, with respect to any ABR Loan or Eurodollar Revolving Loan, or with
respect to the Facility Fees payable hereunder, as the case may be, the applicable rate per annum set forth below under the caption “ABR Spread”, “Eurodollar Spread” or “Facility Fee Rate”, as the case may be, based
upon the ratings by Moody’s and S&P, respectively, applicable on such date to the Index Debt: 
  

													
	 Index Debt Ratings Levels
	  	“Eurodollar
Spread”	 	 	“ABR
Spread”	 	 	“Facility
Fee Rate”	 
	Category 1	  				 				 			
	 Greater than or equal to A3 and A-
	  	 	1.00	% 	 	 	0.00	% 	 	 	0.125	% 
				
	Category 2	  				 				 			
	 Baa1 and BBB+
	  	 	1.10	% 	 	 	0.10	% 	 	 	0.15	% 
				
	Category 3	  				 				 			
	 Baa2 and BBB
	  	 	1.30	% 	 	 	0.30	% 	 	 	0.20	% 
				
	Category 4	  				 				 			
	 Baa3 and BBB-
	  	 	1.50	% 	 	 	0.50	% 	 	 	0.25	% 
				
	Category 5	  				 				 			
	 Equal to or less than Ba1 and BB+
	  	 	1.70	% 	 	 	0.70	% 	 	 	0.30	% 


  
 2 








 For purposes of the foregoing, (i) if either Moody’s or S&P shall not have in
effect a rating for the Index Debt (other than by reason of the circumstances referred to in the last sentence of this definition), then such rating agency shall be deemed to have established a rating in Category 5; (ii) if the ratings
established or deemed to have been established by Moody’s and S&P for the Index Debt shall fall within different Categories, the Applicable Rate shall be based on the higher (the highest Category being Category 1) of the two ratings unless
one of the two ratings is two or more Categories lower than the other, in which case the Applicable Rate shall be determined by reference to the Category next below that of the higher of the two ratings; and (iii) if the ratings established or
deemed to have been established by Moody’s and S&P for the Index Debt shall be changed (other than as a result of a change in the rating system of Moody’s or S&P), such change shall be effective as of the date on which it is first
announced by the applicable rating agency, irrespective of when notice of such change shall have been furnished by the Borrower to the Administrative Agent and the Lenders pursuant to Section 5.01 or otherwise; provided, however,
that notwithstanding the foregoing, at all times during which there shall exist any Event of Default, the “Applicable Rate” shall be determined by reference to the ratings in Category 5. Each change in the Applicable Rate shall apply
during the period commencing on the effective date of such change and ending on the date immediately preceding the effective date of the next such change. If the rating system of Moody’s or S&P shall change, or if either such rating agency
shall cease to be in the business of rating corporate debt obligations, the Borrower and the Lenders shall negotiate in good faith to amend this definition to reflect such changed rating system or the unavailability of ratings from such rating
agency and, pending the effectiveness of any such amendment, the Applicable Rate shall be determined by reference to the rating most recently in effect prior to such change or cessation. 

“Approved Alternate Currency” means Euros, Pounds Sterling or any other currency (other than U.S. Dollars)
approved by the applicable Issuing Bank issuing a Letter of Credit to be denominated in any such other currency; provided that, at such time (i) such other currency is dealt with in the London interbank deposit market, (ii) such
other currency is freely transferable and convertible into U.S. Dollars in the London foreign exchange market, and (iii) no central bank or other governmental authorization in the country of issue of such other currency is required to permit
use of such other currency by any Lender for issuing any Letter of Credit and/or to permit the Borrower to reimburse LC Disbursements thereon and/or to pay any other amounts owing in respect of such Letter of Credit (unless such authorization has
been obtained and is in full force and effect). 
 “Approved Fund” means any Person (other than a natural
person) that is engaged in making, purchasing, holding or investing in bank loans and similar extensions of credit in the ordinary course of its business and that is administered or managed by (a) a Lender, (b) an Affiliate of a Lender or
(c) an entity or an Affiliate of an entity that administers or manages a Lender. 
 “Assignment and
Assumption” means an assignment and assumption agreement entered into by a Lender and an assignee (with the consent of any party whose consent is required by Section 9.04), and accepted by the Administrative Agent, in the form of
Exhibit A or any other form approved by the Administrative Agent. 
 “Attributable Debt” means, when
used in connection with a sale and lease-back transaction, at any date as of which the amount thereof is to be determined, the product of (a) the net proceeds from such sale and lease-back transaction multiplied by (b) a fraction, the
numerator of which is the number of full years of the term of the lease relating to the property involved in such sale and lease-back transaction (without regard to any options to renew or extend such term) remaining at the date of the making of
such computation and the denominator of which is the number of full years of the term of such lease measured from the first day of such term. 

  
 3 








 “Availability Period” means, as to any Lender, the period from
and including the Effective Date to and including the earlier of the Maturity Date of such Lender and any other date of termination of the Commitment of such Lender. 

“B&W Parent” means, collectively, (a) British American Tobacco p.l.c. and (b) Brown &
Williamson Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation), a Delaware corporation and an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary, of British American Tobacco p.l.c. 

“Board” means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System of the United States of America. 

“Board of Directors” means the board of directors of the Borrower or any duly authorized committee of that
board or any director or directors and/or officer or officers of the Borrower to whom that board or committee shall have duly delegated its authority. 

“Borrower” has the meaning assigned to such term in the first paragraph of this Agreement. 

“Borrowing” means (a) Revolving Loans of the same Type, made, converted or continued on the same date
and, in the case of Eurodollar Loans, as to which a single Interest Period is in effect or (b) a Swingline Loan. 

“Borrowing Request” means a request by the Borrower for a Revolving Borrowing in accordance with
Section 2.03. 
 “Business Day” means any day that is not a Saturday, Sunday or other day on which
commercial banks in New York City are authorized or required by law to remain closed; provided that, when used in connection with a Eurodollar Loan, the term “Business Day” shall also exclude any day on which banks are not
open for general business in London. 
 “Capital Lease Obligations” means, as to any Person, the
obligations of such Person to pay rent or other amounts under any lease of (or other arrangement conveying the right to use) real or personal property, or a combination thereof, which obligations are required to be classified and accounted for as
capital leases on a balance sheet of such Person under GAAP, and, for the purposes of this Agreement, the amount of such obligations at any time shall be the capitalized amount thereof at such time determined in accordance with GAAP. 

“Change in Control” means the occurrence of any of the following events: (a) at any time Continuing
Directors shall not constitute a majority of the Board of Directors, (b) any Person or “group” (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 and 13d-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”))
(other than B&W Parent), shall acquire, directly or indirectly, beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 and 13d-5 of the Exchange Act) of 30.0% or more, on a fully diluted basis, of the economic or voting interest in the
Borrower’s capital stock, (c) B&W Parent and/or any other Person or “group” (within the meaning of Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 of the Exchange Act) shall have obtained and exercised the power to elect or designate a majority of the
Board of Directors and (d) any “change of control” event under any Material Indebtedness of the Borrower or any Material Subsidiary. 

“Change in Law” means (a) the adoption of any law, rule or regulation or treaty after the Effective
Date, (b) any change in any law, rule or regulation or treaty or in the administration, interpretation or application thereof by any Governmental Authority after the Effective Date or (c) compliance by any Lender or any Issuing Bank (or,
for purposes of Section 2.14(b), by any lending 

  
 4 








 
office of such Lender or by such Lender’s or such Issuing Bank’s holding company, if any) with any request, guideline or directive (whether or not having the force of law) of any
Governmental Authority made or issued after the Effective Date; provided, however, that notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, (i) the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and all requests, rules,
guidelines, requirements and directives thereunder, issued in connection therewith or in implementation thereof, and (ii) all requests, rules, guidelines, requirements and directives promulgated by the Bank for International Settlements, the
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (or any successor or similar authority) or the United States or foreign regulatory authorities, in each case pursuant to Basel III, shall in each case be deemed to be a “Change in Law” regardless of
the date enacted, adopted, issued or implemented. 
 “Charges” has the meaning assigned to such term in
Section 9.13. 
 “Citibank” means Citibank, N.A. and any successor corporation thereto by merger,
consolidation or otherwise. 
 “Class”, when used in reference to any Loan or Borrowing, refers to whether
such Loan, or the Loans comprising such Borrowing, are Revolving Loans or Swingline Loans. 
 “Code” means
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time. 
 “Commitment” means, with respect to
each Lender, the commitment of such Lender to make Revolving Loans and to acquire participations in Letters of Credit and Swingline Loans hereunder, the amount of which represents the maximum aggregate amount of such Lender’s Revolving Credit
Exposure hereunder, as such commitment may be increased or reduced from time to time pursuant to Section 2.08, 2.18, 2.20, 9.04 or Article VII. The initial amount of each Lender’s Commitment is set forth on Schedule 2.01, or in the
Assignment and Assumption pursuant to which such Lender shall have assumed its Commitment, as applicable. The initial aggregate amount of the Lenders’ Commitments is $1,350,000,000. 

“Commitment Increase” has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 2.20(a). 

“Commitment Increase Lender” has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 2.20(a). 

“Commodity Exchange Act” means the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.), as amended from time
to time. 
 “Consolidated Debt” means, at any date, the aggregate principal amount of all Indebtedness of
the Borrower and its Subsidiaries at such date, determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP; provided that the aggregate amount available to be drawn (i.e., unfunded amounts) under all letters of credit, acceptances and
similar arrangements and all surety, appeal and litigation bonds and similar obligations issued for the account of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries (but excluding, for avoidance of doubt, all unpaid drawings or other matured monetary
obligations or reimbursement obligations owing in respect of thereof) shall not be included in any determination of “Consolidated Debt”. 

“Consolidated EBITDA” means, for any period, Consolidated Net Income for such period plus, without
duplication and to the extent reflected as a charge in the statement of such Consolidated Net Income for such period, the sum of: 

  
 5 








 (I) (a) provision for all income taxes and foreign
withholding taxes, (b) interest expense, amortization or write-off of debt discount and debt issuance costs and commissions, discounts and other fees and charges associated with Indebtedness (including the Loans), (c) depreciation and
amortization expense, (d) amortization of intangibles (including, but not limited to, goodwill) and organization costs, (e) any extraordinary losses, (f) any non-cash expenses or losses, (g) any losses on sales of assets outside
of the ordinary course of business (whether or not otherwise includable as a separate item in the statement of such Consolidated Net Income for such period), (h) any cash payment received during such period in respect of any non-cash item
described in clause (II)(a)(i) or (ii) below subsequent to the fiscal quarter in which the relevant non-cash item was reflected as a gain or income in the statement of Consolidated Net Income, and (i) the amount of all cash payments
received during such period in respect of any settlement with respect to tobacco litigation related liability which otherwise did not increase Consolidated Net Income for such period or a prior period, all as determined on a consolidated basis for
the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for such period, minus  
 (II) (a) to the extent included in
the statement of such Consolidated Net Income for such period, the sum of (i) any extraordinary gain, (ii) any non-cash income or gains, (iii) any gain on sales of assets outside of the ordinary course of business (whether or not
otherwise includable as a separate item in the statement of such Consolidated Net Income for such period), and (iv) income tax credits (to the extent not netted from income tax expense), (b) any cash payments made during such period in
respect of any non-cash items described in clause (I)(d), (e) or (f) above subsequent to the fiscal quarter in which the relevant non-cash item was reflected as a charge in the statement of Consolidated Net Income, and (c) the amount
of all cash payments made by the Borrower and its Subsidiaries during such period pursuant to any settlement with respect to tobacco litigation related liability which otherwise did not reduce Consolidated Net Income for such period or a prior
period, all as determined on a consolidated basis for the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for such period. 
 For the purposes
of calculating Consolidated EBITDA for any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters (each, a “Reference Period”) pursuant to any determination of the Consolidated Leverage Ratio or the Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio,
(i) if at any time during such Reference Period (or, for purposes of Section 6.05(c) only, during the period commencing on the first day of such Reference Period and ending on or prior to such date of determination), the Borrower or any
Subsidiary shall have made any Material Disposition, the Consolidated EBITDA for such Reference Period shall be reduced by an amount equal to the Consolidated EBITDA (if positive) attributable to the property that is the subject of such Material
Disposition for such Reference Period or increased by an amount equal to the Consolidated EBITDA (if negative) attributable thereto for such Reference Period and (ii) if during such Reference Period (or, for purposes of Section 6.05(c)
only, during the period commencing on the first day of such Reference Period and ending on or prior to such date of determination), the Borrower or any Subsidiary shall have made a Material Acquisition, Consolidated EBITDA for such Reference Period
shall be calculated after giving pro forma effect thereto as if such Material Acquisition occurred on the first day of such Reference Period. As used in this definition, “Material Acquisition” means any acquisition of property or
series of related acquisitions of property that (a) constitutes assets comprising all or substantially all of an operating unit of a business or constitutes all or substantially all of the Equity Interests of a Person and (b) involves the
payment of consideration by the Borrower and its Subsidiaries in excess of $250,000,000; and “Material Disposition” means any disposition of property or series of related dispositions of property that yields gross proceeds to the
Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries in excess of $250,000,000. 
 “Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio”
means, for any period, the ratio of (a) Consolidated EBITDA for such period to (b) Consolidated Interest Expense for such period. 

  
 6 








 “Consolidated Interest Expense” means, for any period, total
cash interest expense (including that attributable to Capital Lease Obligations) of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries calculated on a consolidated basis for such period with respect to all outstanding Indebtedness of the Borrower and its
Subsidiaries (including all commissions, discounts and other fees and charges owed with respect to letters of credit and bankers’ acceptance financing and net costs under Swap Agreements in respect of interest rates to the extent such net costs
are allocable to such period in accordance with GAAP). For the purposes of calculating Consolidated Interest Expense for any Reference Period pursuant to any determination of the Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio, (i) all Indebtedness
incurred or issued during the relevant Reference Period (or, for purposes of Section 6.05(c) only, during the period commencing on the first day of such Reference Period and ending on or prior to such date of determination) shall be deemed to
have been incurred or issued (and the proceeds thereof applied) on the first day of such Reference Period and remain outstanding through such Reference Period, (ii) all Indebtedness (other than revolving Indebtedness, except to the extent
accompanied by a corresponding permanent commitment reduction) permanently retired or redeemed during the relevant Reference Period (or, for purposes of Section 6.05(c) only, during the period commencing on the first day of such Reference
Period and ending on or prior to such date of determination) shall be deemed to have been retired or redeemed on the first day of such Reference Period and remain retired through the entirety of such Reference Period, and (iii) all Indebtedness
assumed to be outstanding pursuant to preceding clause (i) shall be deemed to have borne interest at (x) the rate applicable thereto, in the case of fixed rate indebtedness, or (y) the rates which would have been applicable thereto
during the respective Reference Period when same was deemed outstanding (for this purpose, using the floating rate applicable thereto at the time of determination), in the case of floating rate Indebtedness; provided that interest expense
with respect to any Indebtedness for periods while the same was actually outstanding during the respective period shall be calculated using the actual rates applicable thereto while same was actually outstanding. 

“Consolidated Leverage Ratio” means, as at the last day of any period, the ratio of (a) Consolidated
Debt on such day to (b) Consolidated EBITDA for such period. 
 “Consolidated Net Income” means, for
any period, the consolidated net income (or loss) of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries, determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP; provided that there shall be excluded (i) the income (or deficit) of any Person accrued
prior to the date it becomes a Subsidiary of the Borrower or is merged into or consolidated with the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, subject to the second sentence of the definition of “Consolidated EBITDA”, (ii) the income (or
deficit) of any Person (other than a Subsidiary of the Borrower) in which the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries has an ownership interest, except to the extent that any such income is actually received by the Borrower or such Subsidiary in the
form of dividends or similar distributions and (iii) the undistributed earnings of any Subsidiary of the Borrower to the extent that the declaration or payment of dividends or similar distributions by such Subsidiary is not at the time
permitted by the terms of any Contractual Obligation or Requirement of Law applicable to such Subsidiary. 

“Consolidated Net Worth” means, at any date of determination, the consolidated shareholders’ equity of
the Borrower, as set forth on the then most recently available consolidated balance sheet of the Borrower and its consolidated Subsidiaries delivered pursuant to Section 5.01(a) or (b). 

“Continuing Director” means, at any date, an individual (a) who is a member of the Board of Directors on
the Effective Date, (b) who, as at such date, has been a member of the Board of Directors for at least the twelve preceding months, or (c) who has been nominated for election, elected, designated or appointed to be a member of the Board of
Directors by either (i) B&W Parent pursuant to any governance agreement, including, without limitation, the Governance Agreement, or (ii) a majority of the other “Continuing Directors” then in office. 

  
 7 








 “Continuing Lender” means, at any time, (a) each Lender
that has a Maturity Date which is the Final Maturity Date and (b) each Lender that has then consented to the extension of its then Maturity Date to the newly proposed Final Maturity Date pursuant to Section 2.21 on or prior to the
applicable Extension Response Date in circumstances where Continuing Lenders (as defined in preceding clause (a)) holding at least a majority of the Commitments have not consented to an extension of the Final Maturity Date on or prior to such date.

 “Contractual Obligation” means, as to any Person, any provision of any security issued by such Person or
of any agreement, instrument or other undertaking to which such Person is a party or by which it or any of its property is bound. 

“Control” means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the
management or policies of a Person, whether through the ability to exercise voting power, by contract or otherwise. “Controlling” and “Controlled” have meanings correlative thereto. 

“Default” means any event or condition which constitutes an Event of Default or which upon notice, lapse of
time or both would, unless cured or waived, become an Event of Default. 
 “Defaulting Lender” means any
Lender that has (a) failed, within three Business Days of the date required to be funded or paid, to (i) fund any portion of its Loans, (ii) fund any portion of its participations in Letters of Credit or Swingline Loans or
(iii) pay over to the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank, any Swingline Lender or any other Lender any other amount required to be paid by it hereunder, unless (A) in the case of clause (i) above, such Lender notifies the
Administrative Agent and the Borrower in writing that such failure is the result of such Lender’s good faith determination that a condition precedent to funding (specifically identified and including the particular default, if any) has not been
satisfied or (B) in the case of clause (iii) above, such Lender notifies the Administrative Agent and the Borrower in writing that the failure to pay such other amount is the subject of a good faith dispute, (b) notified the Borrower,
the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank, any Swingline Lender or any Lender in writing that it does not intend to comply with any of its funding obligations under this Agreement or has made a public statement to the effect that it does not intend
to comply with its funding obligations under this Agreement or generally under other agreements in which it commits to extend credit (unless such writing or public statement indicates that such position is based on such Lender’s good faith
determination that a condition precedent (specifically identified and including the particular default, if any) to funding a Loan under this Agreement cannot be satisfied), (c) failed, within three Business Days after a good faith request by
the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank or any Swingline Lender to provide a certification in writing from such Lender’s chief financial officer that it will comply with the terms of this Agreement relating to its obligations
to fund prospective Loans and participations in then outstanding Letters of Credit and Swingline Loans; provided that such Lender shall cease to be a Defaulting Lender pursuant to this clause (c) upon the Borrower’s, the
Administrative Agent’s, each Issuing Bank’s or each Swingline Lender’s, as the case may be, receipt of such certification in form and substance satisfactory to such Person, or (d) become the subject of a bankruptcy or insolvency
proceeding, or has had a receiver, conservator, trustee, administrator, assignee for the benefit of creditors or similar Person charged with reorganization or liquidation of its business or custodian, appointed for it, or has taken any action in
furtherance of, or indicating its consent to, approval of or acquiescence in any such proceeding or appointment or has a parent company that has become the subject of a bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding, or has had a receiver, conservator,
trustee, administrator, assignee for the benefit of creditors or similar Person charged with reorganization or liquidation of its business or custodian appointed for it, or has taken any action in furtherance of, or indicating its consent to,
approval of or acquiescence in any such proceeding or appointment; provided that a Lender shall not be a Defaulting Lender solely by virtue of the ownership, or the acquisition of any ownership, interest in such Lender or a parent company
thereof or the exercise of control over such Lender or parent company thereof by a Governmental Authority or instrumentality thereof. 

  
 8 








 “Designated Person” means (a) a Person that is listed in
the annex to, or is otherwise subject to the provisions of, the Executive Order; (b) a Person owned or controlled by, or acting for or on behalf of, any Person that is listed in the annex to, or is otherwise subject to the provisions of, the
Executive Order; (c) a Person with which any Lender is prohibited from dealing or otherwise engaging in any transaction by any Anti-Terrorism Law; (d) a Person that commits, threatens or conspires to commit or supports
“terrorism” as defined in the Executive Order; or (e) a Person that is named as a “specially designated national and blocked person” on the most current list published by OFAC at its official website or any replacement
website or other replacement official publication of such list. 
 “Designated Swap Bank” means any Person
that is a Lender or an Affiliate of a Lender at the time it enters into a Designated Swap Agreement, in its capacity as a party thereto, together with such Person’s successors and permitted assigns. 

“Designated Swap Agreement” means any Swap Agreement between the Borrower and a Lender or an Affiliate of a
Lender at the time it enters into such Swap Agreement, which has been designated in writing at any time on or after the Effective Date by the applicable Lender (or Affiliate of a Lender) to the Administrative Agent and the Borrower as a
“Designated Swap Agreement”. Each holder of Designated Swap Obligations that is not a party to this Agreement that has given the notice contemplated by the preceding sentence shall, by such notice, be deemed to have acknowledged and
accepted the appointment of the Administrative Agent pursuant to the terms of Article VIII hereof for itself and its Affiliates as if a “Lender” party hereto. 

“Designated Swap Obligations” means any and all obligations of the Borrower owing in connection with, or in
respect of, any Designated Swap Agreement (including monetary obligations incurred during the pendency of any bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or other similar proceeding, regardless of whether allowed or allowable in such proceeding). 

“Disclosed Matters” means the actions, suits and proceedings disclosed in Schedule 3.06. 

“Documentation Agents” means, collectively, Credit Suisse Securities (USA), LLC, Fifth Third Bank, Goldman
Sachs Bank USA, Mizuho Bank, Ltd., Royal Bank of Canada and The Bank of Nova Scotia, acting in their capacity as documentation agents for the Facility. 

“Dollar Equivalent” means, at any time, (a) with respect to any amount denominated in U.S. Dollars, such
amount, and (b) with respect to any amount denominated in any Approved Alternate Currency, the equivalent amount thereof in U.S. Dollars as determined by the Administrative Agent at such time on the basis of the Spot Rate (determined in respect
of the most recent Revaluation Date) for the purchase of U.S. Dollars with such Approved Alternate Currency. 

“Domestic Subsidiary” of any Person means any Subsidiary of such Person incorporated or organized in the
United States of America or any State or territory thereof, or the District of Columbia. 
 “Effective
Date” means the date on which the conditions specified in Section 4.01 are satisfied (or waived in accordance with Section 9.02). 

“EMU Legislation” means the legislative measures of the European Council for the introduction of, changeover
to or operation of a single or unified European currency. 

  
 9 








 “Environmental Laws” means all laws, rules, regulations, codes,
ordinances, orders, decrees, judgments, injunctions, notices or binding agreements issued, promulgated or entered into by any Governmental Authority, relating in any way to the environment, preservation or reclamation of natural resources, the
management, release or threatened release of any Hazardous Material or to health and safety matters. 

“Environmental Liability” means any liability, contingent or otherwise (including any liability for damages,
costs of environmental remediation, fines, penalties or indemnities), of the Borrower or any Subsidiary directly or indirectly resulting from or based upon (a) violation of any Environmental Law, (b) the generation, use, handling,
transportation, storage, treatment or disposal of any Hazardous Materials, (c) exposure to any Hazardous Materials, (d) the release or threatened release of any Hazardous Materials into the environment or (e) any contract, agreement
or other consensual arrangement pursuant to which liability is assumed or imposed with respect to any of the foregoing. 

“Equity Interests” means shares of capital stock, partnership interests, membership interests in a limited
liability company, beneficial interests in a trust or other equity ownership interests in a Person, and any warrants, options or other rights entitling the holder thereof to purchase or acquire any such equity interest. 

“ERISA” means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended from time to time. 

“ERISA Affiliate” means any trade or business (whether or not incorporated) that, together with the Borrower,
is treated as a single employer under Section 414(b) or (c) of the Code or, solely for purposes of Section 302 of ERISA and Section 412 of the Code, is treated as a single employer under Section 414 of the Code. 

“ERISA Event” means (a) any “reportable event”, as defined in Section 4043 of ERISA or
the regulations issued thereunder with respect to a Plan (other than an event for which the 30-day notice period is waived); (b) the existence with respect to any Multiemployer Plan of an
“accumulated funding deficiency” (as defined in Section 431 of the Code or Section 304 of ERISA), whether or not waived; (c) a determination is made that any Plan is, or is reasonably expected to be, considered an at-risk
plan within the meaning of Section 430 of the Code or Section 303 of ERISA; (d) the receipt by the Borrower or an ERISA Affiliate of any notice, or the receipt by a Multiemployer Plan from the Borrower or an ERISA Affiliate of any
notice, that a Multiemployer Plan is in endangered or critical status under Section 305 of ERISA; (e) the filing pursuant to Section 412(c) of the Code or Section 302(c) of ERISA of an application for a waiver of the minimum
funding standard with respect to any Plan; (f) the incurrence by the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates of any liability under Title IV of ERISA with respect to the termination of any Plan; (g) the receipt by the Borrower or any
of its ERISA Affiliates from the PBGC or a plan administrator of any notice relating to an intention to terminate any Plan or Plans or to appoint a trustee to administer any Plan; (h) the incurrence by the Borrower or any of its ERISA
Affiliates of any liability with respect to the withdrawal or partial withdrawal from any Plan or Multiemployer Plan; or (i) the receipt by the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates of any notice, or the receipt by any Multiemployer Plan from
the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates of any notice, concerning the imposition of Withdrawal Liability or a determination that a Multiemployer Plan is, or is expected to be, insolvent or in reorganization, within the meaning of Title IV
of ERISA. 
 “Eurodollar”, when used in reference to any Loan or Borrowing, refers to whether such Loan, or
the Loans comprising such Borrowing, are bearing interest at a rate determined by reference to the Adjusted LIBO Rate. 

  
 10 








 “Euros” and the sign “€” each mean the
single lawful currency of the “Participating Member States” (as described in the EMU Legislation) introduced in accordance with the EMU Legislation. 

“Event of Default” has the meaning assigned to such term in Article VII. 

“Excluded Swap Obligation” means, with respect to any Subsidiary Guarantor, any Swap Obligation if, and to
the extent that, all or a portion of the guaranty of such Swap Obligation by such Subsidiary Guarantor under the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement is or becomes illegal under the Commodity Exchange Act or any rule, regulation or order of the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission (or the application or official interpretation of any thereof) by virtue of such Subsidiary Guarantor’s failure for any reason to constitute an “eligible contract participant” as defined in the Commodity
Exchange Act and the regulations thereunder at the time the guaranty of such Subsidiary Guarantor becomes effective with respect to such Swap Obligation. If a Swap Obligation arises under a master agreement governing more than one swap, such
exclusion shall apply only to the portion of such Swap Obligation that is attributable to swaps for which such guaranty under the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement is or becomes illegal. 

“Excluded Taxes” means, with respect to any payment made by any Loan Party under this Agreement or any other
Loan Document, any of the following Taxes imposed on or with respect to a Recipient: (a) income, franchise or other Taxes imposed on (or measured by) its net income, profits, overall gross income or receipts by the United States of America (or
any political subdivision thereof), or by the jurisdiction under the laws of which such Recipient is organized or in which its principal office is located or, in the case of any Lender, in which its applicable lending office is located, (b) any
branch profits Taxes imposed by the United States of America or any similar Taxes imposed by any other jurisdiction listed in clause (a), (c) in the case of a Non-U.S. Lender (other than an assignee pursuant to a request by the Borrower under
Section 2.18(b)), any U.S. Federal withholding Taxes resulting from any law in effect on the date such Non-U.S. Lender becomes a party to this Agreement (or designates a new lending office) or is
attributable to such Non-U.S. Lender’s failure to comply with Section 2.16(f)(i)-(ii), except to the extent that such Non-U.S. Lender (or its assignor, if any) was entitled, at the time of
designation of a new lending office (or assignment), to receive additional amounts from the Borrower with respect to such withholding Taxes pursuant to Section 2.16(a), and (d) any withholding tax imposed under FATCA. 

“Executive Order” has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 3.13(a). 

“Exempted Debt” means the sum, without duplication, of the following items outstanding as of the date
Exempted Debt is being determined: (a) Indebtedness of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries incurred after the date hereof and secured by Liens created, assumed or otherwise incurred or permitted to exist pursuant to Section 6.01(b); and
(b) Attributable Debt of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries in respect of all sale and lease-back transactions with regard to any Principal Property entered into pursuant to Section 6.02(b). 

“Existing Credit Agreement” means the credit facility evidenced by the Credit Agreement, dated as of
July 29, 2011, among the Borrower, various lending institutions and JPMCB, as Administrative Agent, as in effect on the Effective Date. 

“Existing Letter of Credit” has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 2.05(d). 

“Existing Liens” means the Liens on the assets and properties of the Subsidiaries of the Borrower outstanding
on the Effective Date and set forth in Schedule 6.01. 

  
 11 








 “Existing Senior Notes Indentures” means that certain Indenture,
dated as of May 31, 2006, by and among the Borrower, as issuer, certain Subsidiaries of the Borrower, as guarantors, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, as in effect on the Effective Date and as the same may be amended,
modified and/or supplemented from time to time. 
 “Existing Term Loan Agreement” means that certain Term
Loan Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2013, by and among the Borrower, the various lending institutions party thereto and JPMCB, as Administrative Agent, as in effect on the Effective Date. 

“Expected Total Commitment” means, at any time of determination with respect to any future date, the Total
Commitment in effect at such time of determination less the aggregate Commitments of all Lenders with a Maturity Date prior to such future date. 

“Extension Date” means October 8, 2014 or October 8, 2015, as applicable; provided that no
Extension Date shall occur after October 8, 2015. 
 “Extension Response Date” has the meaning
assigned to such term in Section 2.21. 
 “Facility” means the credit facility evidenced by this
Agreement. 
 “Facility Fee” has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 2.11. 

“FATCA” means Sections 1471 through 1474 of the Code, as of the date of this Agreement and any regulations or
official interpretations thereof. 
 “Federal Funds Effective Rate” means, for any day, the weighted
average (rounded upwards, if necessary, to the next 1/100 of 1%) of the rates on overnight Federal funds transactions with members of the Federal Reserve System arranged by Federal funds brokers, as published on the next succeeding Business Day by
the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or, if such rate is not so published for any day that is a Business Day, the average (rounded upwards, if necessary, to the next 1/100 of 1%) of the quotations for such day for such transactions received by
the Administrative Agent from three Federal funds brokers of recognized standing selected by it. 
 “Final Maturity
Date” means October 8, 2017, as such date may be extended pursuant to Section 2.21. 
 “Financial
Officer” means the chief financial officer, principal accounting officer, treasurer or controller of the Borrower. 

“Fitch” means Fitch Ratings. 

“Foreign Subsidiary” of any Person means any Subsidiary of such Person that is not a Domestic Subsidiary.

 “Funded Debt” means all Indebtedness for borrowed money, including purchase money indebtedness, having a
maturity of more than one year from the date of its creation or having a maturity of less than one year but by its terms being renewable or extendible, at the option of the obligor in respect thereof, beyond one year from its creation. 

  
 12 








 “GAAP” means generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States of America as in effect from time to time; provided that determinations in accordance with GAAP shall be subject to the requirements of Section 1.04. 

“Governance Agreement” means that certain Governance Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2004, by and among
the Borrower, Brown & Williamson Holdings, Inc. and British American Tobacco p.l.c., as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time. 

“Governmental Authority” means the government of the United States of America, any other nation or any
political subdivision thereof, whether state or local, and any agency, authority, administration, instrumentality, regulatory body, court, central bank or other entity exercising executive, legislative, judicial, taxing, regulatory or administrative
powers or functions of or pertaining to government (including any supra-national bodies such as the European Union or the European Central Bank) and any group or body charged with setting financial accounting or regulatory capital rules or
standards. 
 “Guarantee” of or by any Person (the “guarantor”) means any obligation,
contingent or otherwise, of the guarantor guaranteeing or having the economic effect of guaranteeing any Indebtedness or other obligation (the “primary obligation”) of any other Person (the “primary obligor”) in any
manner, whether directly or indirectly, and including any obligation of the guarantor, direct or indirect, (a) to purchase or pay (or advance or supply funds for the purchase or payment of) such primary obligation or to purchase (or to advance
or supply funds for the purchase of) any security for the payment thereof, (b) to purchase or lease property, securities or services for the purpose of assuring the owner of such primary obligation of the payment thereof, (c) to maintain
working capital, equity capital or any other financial statement condition or liquidity of the primary obligor so as to enable the primary obligor to pay such primary obligation or (d) as an account party in respect of any letter of credit or
letter of guaranty issued to support such primary obligation; provided, that the term Guarantee shall not include endorsements for collection or deposit in the ordinary course of business. The amount of any Guarantee shall be deemed to be an
amount equal to the lesser of (x) the maximum stated or determinable amount of such Guarantee and (y) the stated or determinable amount of the primary obligation in respect of which such Guarantee is made or, if not stated or determinable,
the maximum reasonably anticipated liability in respect thereof (assuming such Person is required to perform thereunder) as determined by such Person in good faith. 

“Hazardous Materials” means all explosive or radioactive substances or wastes and all hazardous or toxic
substances, wastes or other pollutants, including petroleum or petroleum distillates, asbestos or asbestos containing materials, polychlorinated biphenyls, radon gas, infectious or medical wastes and all other substances or wastes of any nature
regulated pursuant to any Environmental Law. 
 “Incremental Amendment” has the meaning assigned to such
term in Section 2.20(a). 
 “Indebtedness” means, of any Person at any date, without duplication,
(a) all indebtedness of such Person for borrowed money or with respect to deposits or advances of any kind, (b) all obligations of such Person for the deferred purchase price of property or services (other than current trade payables and
accrued expenses incurred in the ordinary course of such Person’s business and any obligation of the Borrower or any Subsidiary thereof to purchase tobacco and/or other products, services and produce utilized in its business pursuant to
agreements entered into in the ordinary course of business on a basis consistent with the Borrower’s or such Subsidiary’s past practices or then current industry practices), (c) all obligations of such Person evidenced by notes,
bonds, debentures or other similar instruments, (d) all indebtedness created or arising under any conditional sale or other title retention agreement with respect to property acquired by such Person (even though the rights and remedies of the
seller or lender under such agreement in the event of default are limited to repossession or 

  
 13 








 
sale of such property), (e) all Capital Lease Obligations of such Person, (f) all obligations of such Person, contingent or otherwise, as an account party or applicant under or in
respect of acceptances, letters of credit or similar arrangements, (g) the maximum amount available to be drawn or paid under all surety, appeal and litigation bonds and similar obligations issued for the account of such Person and all
unreimbursed payments in respect of such surety, appeal and litigation bonds and similar obligations, (h) all Guarantees by such Person in respect of obligations of the kind referred to in clauses (a) through (g) above, and
(i) all obligations of the kind referred to in clauses (a) through (h) above secured by (or for which the holder of such obligation has an existing right, contingent or otherwise, to be secured by) any Lien on property (including
accounts and contract rights) owned by such Person, whether or not such Person has assumed or become liable for the payment of such obligation. The Indebtedness of any Person shall include the Indebtedness of any other entity (including any
partnership in which such Person is a general partner) to the extent such Person is liable therefor as a result of such Person’s ownership interest in or other relationship with such entity, except to the extent the terms of such Indebtedness
expressly provide that such Person is not liable therefor. 
 “Indemnified Taxes” means (a) Taxes,
other than Excluded Taxes, imposed on or with respect to any payment made by any Loan Party under this Agreement or any other Loan Document and (b) Other Taxes. 

“Indemnitee” has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 9.03(b). 

“Index Debt” means senior, unsecured, long-term Indebtedness for borrowed money of the Borrower that is not
guaranteed by any other Person (other than a Subsidiary Guarantor) or subject to any other credit enhancement. 

“Information” has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 9.12(a). 

“Information Memorandum” means the Confidential Information Memorandum dated August 2013 relating to the
Borrower and the Transactions. 
 “Interest Election Request” means a request by the Borrower to convert or
continue a Revolving Borrowing in accordance with Section 2.07. 
 “Impacted Interest Period” means,
with respect to a LIBOR Screen Rate, an Interest Period which shall not be available at the applicable time. 

“Interest Payment Date” means (a) with respect to any ABR Loan (other than a Swingline Loan), the last
day of each March, June, September and December, (b) with respect to any Eurodollar Loan, the last day of the Interest Period applicable to the Borrowing of which such Loan is a part and, in the case of a Eurodollar Borrowing with an Interest
Period of more than three months’ duration, each day prior to the last day of such Interest Period that occurs at intervals of three months’ duration after the first day of such Interest Period and (c) with respect to any Swingline
Loan, the day that such Loan is required to be repaid. 
 “Interest Period” means with respect to any
Eurodollar Borrowing, the period commencing on the date of such Borrowing and ending on the numerically corresponding day in the calendar month that is one, two, three or six months thereafter (or, if agreed to by the Administrative Agent and
each Lender, such other day occurring less than one month after such Borrowing date), as the Borrower may elect; provided, that (i) if any Interest Period would end on a day other than a Business Day, such Interest Period shall be
extended to the next succeeding Business Day unless, in the case of a Eurodollar Borrowing only, such next succeeding Business Day would fall in the next calendar month, in 

  
 14 








 
which case such Interest Period shall end on the next preceding Business Day and (ii) any Interest Period pertaining to a Eurodollar Borrowing that commences on the last Business Day of a
calendar month (or on a day for which there is no numerically corresponding day in the last calendar month of such Interest Period) shall end on the last Business Day of the last calendar month of such Interest Period. For purposes hereof, the date
of a Borrowing initially shall be the date on which such Borrowing is made and, in the case of a Revolving Borrowing, thereafter shall be the effective date of the most recent conversion or continuation of such Borrowing. 

“Interpolated Rate” means, at any time, for any Interest Period, the rate per annum (rounded to the same
number of decimal places as the relevant LIBOR Screen Rates) determined by the Administrative Agent (which determination shall be conclusive and binding absent manifest error) to be equal to the rate that results from interpolating on a linear basis
between: (a) the LIBOR Screen Rate (for the longest period for which the LIBOR Screen Rate is available) that is shorter than the Impacted Interest Period and (b) the LIBOR Screen Rate for the shortest period (for which such LIBOR Screen
Rate is available) that exceeds the Impacted Interest Period, in each case, as of approximately 11:00 a.m., London time, two Business Days prior to the commencement of such Interest Period. 

“IRS” means the United States Internal Revenue Service. 

“Issuing Bank” means (a) JPMCB, (b) each other Lender requested by the Borrower to issue Letters of
Credit, to the extent consented to by such Lender and the Administrative Agent and (c) with respect to Existing Letters of Credit, the Lender designated as the issuer thereof on Schedule 2.05, in each case in its capacity as an issuer of
Letters of Credit hereunder, and their respective successors in such capacity as provided in Section 2.05(j). Each Issuing Bank may, in its discretion, arrange for one or more Letters of Credit to be issued by Affiliates of such Issuing Bank,
in which case the term “Issuing Bank” shall include any such Affiliate with respect to Letters of Credit issued by such Affiliate. 

“JPMCB” means JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and any successor corporation thereto by merger, consolidation or
otherwise. 
 “Judgment Currency” has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 9.16. 

“LC Availability Period” means, as to any Issuing Bank, the period from and including the Effective Date to
and including the earlier of the LC Issuer Maturity Date of such Issuing Bank and any other date of termination of the Commitments of such Issuing Bank (in its capacity as a Lender). 

“LC Disbursement” means a payment made by an Issuing Bank pursuant to a Letter of Credit. 

“LC Exposure” means, at any time, the sum of (a) the aggregate Stated Amount of all outstanding Letters
of Credit at such time plus (b) the aggregate amount of all LC Disbursements (taking the Dollar Equivalent of any LC Disbursement made in a currency other than U.S. Dollars) that have not yet been reimbursed by or on behalf of the Borrower at
such time. The LC Exposure of any Lender at any time shall be its Applicable Percentage of the total LC Exposure at such time. 

“LC Issuer Maturity Date” has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 2.05(c). 

“LC Termination Date” means the fifth Business Day preceding the Final Maturity Date. 

“Lead Agents” means the Administrative Agent and the Syndication Agent. 

  
 15 








 “Lenders” means the Persons listed on Schedule 2.01 and any
other Person that shall have become a party hereto pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption or Section 2.20, other than any such Person that ceases to be a party hereto pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption. Unless the context otherwise
requires, the term “Lenders” includes the Issuing Banks and the Swingline Lenders. 
 “Letter of
Credit” means any letter of credit issued pursuant to this Agreement. 
 “LIBO Rate” means, with
respect to any Eurodollar Borrowing for any applicable Interest Period, the LIBOR Screen Rate, as determined by the Administrative Agent from time to time for purposes of providing quotations of interest rates applicable to U.S. Dollar deposits
in the London interbank market) at approximately 11:00 a.m., London time, two Business Days prior to the commencement of such Interest Period, as the rate for U.S. Dollar deposits with a maturity comparable to such Interest Period;
provided that if a LIBOR Screen Rate shall not be available at the applicable time for the applicable Interest Period, then the LIBO Rate and Interest Period shall be the Interpolated Rate; provided, further, that if the
applicable LIBOR Screen Rate shall not be available for the applicable Interest Period for any reason and the Administrative Agent shall determine that it is not possible to determine the Interpolated Rate (which conclusion shall be conclusive and
binding absent manifest error), then the rate at which the Administrative Agent could borrow funds in the London interbank market, were it to do so by asking for and then accepting offers in reasonable market size and for such relevant Interest
Period shall be the LIBO Rate for such Interest Period for such Eurodollar Borrowing, subject to Section 2.14. 

“LIBOR Screen Rate” means the London interbank offered rate administered by the British Bankers Association
(or any other Person that takes over the administration of such rate) for U.S. Dollar deposits for a period equal in length to such Interest Period as displayed on pages LIBOR01 or LIBOR02 of the Reuters screen or, in the event such rate does
not appear on either of such Reuters pages, on any successor or substitute page on such screen that displays such rate, or on the appropriate page of such other information service that publishes such rate as shall be selected by the Administrative
Agent from time to time in its reasonable discretion; provided, that, if any LIBOR Screen Rate shall be less than zero, such rate shall be deemed to be zero for purposes of this Agreement. 

“Lien” means, with respect to any asset, (a) any mortgage, deed of trust, lien, pledge, hypothecation,
encumbrance, charge or security interest in, on or of such asset and (b) the interest of a vendor or a lessor under any conditional sale agreement, capital lease or title retention agreement (or any financing lease having substantially the same
economic effect as any of the foregoing) relating to such asset. 
 “Litigation Bond” means any surety
bond, supersedeas bond, judgment bond or other bond or insurance policy issued for bonding litigation judgments for appeal. 

“Loan Documents” means this Agreement, any promissory note of the Borrower issued as described in
Section 2.09(f) and, on the execution and delivery thereof, the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement. 
 “Loan
Parties” means the Borrower and each Subsidiary Guarantor. 
 “Loans” means the loans made by the
Lenders to the Borrower pursuant to this Agreement. 
 “Margin Stock” has the meaning assigned to such term
in Regulation U. 

  
 16 








 “Marketable Investments” means, as to any Person,
(a) securities issued or directly and fully guaranteed or insured by the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof having maturities of not more than two years from the date of acquisition, (b) marketable direct obligations
issued by any state of the United States or any political subdivision of any such state or any public instrumentality thereof maturing within two years from the date of acquisition thereof and, at the time of acquisition, having one of the two
highest ratings obtainable from S&P, Moody’s or Fitch, (c) U.S. Dollar denominated domestic and Eurodollar time deposits, domestic and Yankee certificates of deposit and bank obligations and bankers acceptances of any Lender or
any commercial bank having, or which is the principal banking subsidiary of a bank holding company having, a long-term unsecured debt rating of at least “A” or the equivalent thereof from S&P or Fitch or “A2” or the
equivalent thereof from Moody’s with maturities of not more than two years from the date of acquisition by such Person, (d) repurchase obligations with a term of not more than one year and collateralized with U.S. Treasury, U.S. government
agency or other permitted investments consistent with the Borrower’s corporate guidelines and which have a collateral margin of at least 102.0%, marked to market daily, (e) commercial paper, extendable commercial notes and master notes
issued by any Person incorporated in the United States and euro-commercial paper of domestic and foreign companies rated at least A-1 or the equivalent thereof by S&P or at least P-1 or the equivalent thereof by Moody’s or at least F-1 by
Fitch and in each case maturing not more than 397 days after the date of acquisition by such Person, (f) U.S. Dollar denominated commercial paper or Canadian dollar commercial paper of Canadian companies and government obligations of
Canada whose commercial paper is rated R-1 by Dominion Bond Rating Service, (g) investments in 2a-7 money market funds, (h) corporate bonds and medium term notes rated at least “A” by S&P and/or Fitch and/or “A2” by
Moody’s with maturities of not more than two years from the date of acquisition by such Person, (i) asset-backed securities and mortgage-backed securities rated “A” or better by any of S&P, Moody’s or Fitch with
maturities or rate reset dates of not more than two years from the date of acquisition by such Person, (j) taxable money market preferred (including but not limited to taxable auction debt) instruments rated at least “A” by S&P
and/or Moody’s and/or Fitch and redeemable at par with a rollover period no longer than six months, (k) tax exempt debt and par value preferred instruments rated at least “A” or the equivalent by S&P and/or Moody’s
and/or Fitch and redeemable at par with a rollover period no longer than six months, (l) domestic and international equity and bond funds (including indexed funds) with a “market capitalization” or “assets under management”
of not less than $500,000,000, (m) separate account portfolios managed by registered investment advisors with guidelines adhering substantially to the securities above (it being understood, however, that, for purposes of clause (h) above,
a bond portfolio that holds corporate bonds and medium term notes rated at least “BBB” by S&P and/or Fitch and/or “Baa2” by Moody’s (and with maturities of not more than two years from the date of acquisition) shall be
considered to adhere “substantially to the guidelines” in clause (h) above, so long as such bond portfolio holds securities that (on a blended basis) satisfy the rating requirements for securities of the type described in clause
(h) above), and (n) separate account portfolios which (i) constitute “current assets” within the meaning of GAAP, (ii) are managed by a registered investment advisor and (iii) invest in securities of the type
described in clauses (a) and (b) above, except that the underlying securities may have maturities in excess of two years, so long as the underlying securities held in such account portfolio have an average duration of not more than five
years; provided that the fair market value of all funds of the type described in this clause (n) owned or held by the Borrower and its Subsidiaries shall not exceed $500,000,000. 

“Master Settlement Agreement” means (a) that certain Master Settlement Agreement, entered into on
November 23, 1998, by the major U.S. cigarette manufacturers, including R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and Brown & Williamson Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation), with attorneys general representing
the remaining 46 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa and the Northern Marianas, and (b) the prior settlement agreements by the major U.S. cigarette manufacturers, including R.J. Reynolds
Tobacco Company and B&W Parent, with attorneys general representing Florida, Mississippi, Minnesota and Texas. 

  
 17 








 “Material Adverse Effect” means a material adverse effect on
(a) the operations, business, property, assets or financial condition of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, and/or (b) the rights or remedies of the Administrative Agent and the Lenders or the ability of any Loan Party to
perform its obligations to the Administrative Agent or the Lenders hereunder or under any other Loan Document to which it is party. 

“Material Indebtedness” means Indebtedness (other than the Loans and Letters of Credit), or obligations in
respect of one or more Swap Agreements, of any one or more of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries in an aggregate principal amount exceeding $200,000,000. For purposes of determining Material Indebtedness, the “principal amount” of the
obligations of the Borrower or any Subsidiary in respect of any Swap Agreement at any time shall be the maximum aggregate amount (giving effect to any netting agreements) that the Borrower or such Subsidiary would be required to pay if such Swap
Agreement were terminated at such time. 
 “Material Subsidiary” means, as of any date of determination on
and after the Effective Date, any Subsidiary that has (a) consolidated total revenues for the then most recent fiscal year for which financial statements have been (or are required to be) furnished pursuant to Section 5.01(a) (and, upon
written notice by the Administrative Agent to the Borrower, for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters ended prior to the date on which financial statements have been (or are required to be) furnished pursuant to Section 5.01(b) for the
fiscal quarter ended June 30) which equal or exceed 10.0% of the consolidated total revenues of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for such period or (b) consolidated total assets at the last day of the then most recent fiscal year for
which financial statements have been (or are required to be) furnished pursuant to Section 5.01(a) (and, upon written notice by the Administrative Agent to the Borrower, at the last day of the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters ended
prior to the date on which financial statements have been (or are required to be) furnished pursuant to Section 5.01(b) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30) which equal or exceed 10.0% of the consolidated total assets of the Borrower and
its Subsidiaries at such date; provided, however, that if (i) consolidated total revenues of all Subsidiaries which are not Material Subsidiaries (as then determined in accordance with this definition) for the then most recent fiscal
year for which financial statements have been (or are required to be) furnished pursuant to Section 5.01(a) (and, upon written notice by the Administrative Agent to the Borrower, for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters ended prior to
the date on which financial statements have been (or are required to be) furnished pursuant to Section 5.01(b) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30) equal or exceed 15.0% of the consolidated total revenues of the Borrower and its
Subsidiaries for such period or (ii) the consolidated total assets of all Subsidiaries which are not Material Subsidiaries (as then determined in accordance with this definition) at the last day of the then most recent fiscal year for which
financial statements have been (or are required to be) furnished pursuant to Section 5.01(a) (and, upon written notice by the Administrative Agent to the Borrower, at the last day of the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters ended prior to
the date on which financial statements have been (or are required to be) furnished pursuant to Section 5.01(b) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30) equal or exceed 15.0% of the consolidated total assets of the Borrower and its
Subsidiaries at such date, then the Borrower shall promptly (and in any event within ten Business Days after the date such financial statements are so delivered or required to be so delivered) designate one or more additional Subsidiaries
(the identity of such Subsidiaries to be determined by the Borrower in its discretion), in writing to the Administrative Agent as “Material Subsidiaries”, whereupon each such Subsidiary shall be a “Material Subsidiary” for all
purposes of this Agreement until such Subsidiary is redesignated as an “Immaterial Subsidiary” as provided below; provided, further that, if no Default has occurred and is continuing, the Borrower may, at any time, by written
notice to the Administrative Agent, redesignate any such Material Subsidiary so designated pursuant to the immediately preceding proviso as an “Immaterial Subsidiary” if 

  
 18 








 
(and only if) the consolidated total revenues and consolidated total assets of Subsidiaries that are not Material Subsidiaries at such time (determined after giving effect to such redesignation)
would not exceed the limits set forth in clause (i) or (ii) above, whereupon such Subsidiary shall cease to be a “Material Subsidiary” for all purposes of this Agreement until such Subsidiary is required to be treated (or
redesignated as) a “Material Subsidiary” pursuant to the foregoing requirements of this definition. Upon the acquisition of a new Subsidiary or the merger or consolidation of any Person with or into an existing Subsidiary (or the
acquisition of other assets by an existing Subsidiary), the qualification of the affected Subsidiary as a “Material Subsidiary” pursuant to the foregoing requirements of this definition shall be determined on a pro forma basis as if such
Subsidiary had been acquired or such merger, consolidation or other acquisition had occurred, as applicable, at the beginning of the relevant period of four consecutive fiscal quarters. In the event any Subsidiary becomes a Material Subsidiary after
the Effective Date (including as a result of a designation pursuant to the second preceding sentence), the Borrower shall cause such Material Subsidiary to comply with Section 5.09, to the extent applicable. As of the Effective Date, the
Subsidiaries identified on Schedule 3.12 as “Material Subsidiaries” are the Material Subsidiaries determined in accordance with the requirements of this definition as of such date. 

“Maturity Date” of any Lender means October 8, 2017, as such date may be extended for such Lender
pursuant to Section 2.21. 
 “Maximum Rate” has the meaning assigned to such term in
Section 9.13. 
 “Moody’s” means Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. 

“Multiemployer Plan” means a multiemployer plan as defined in Section 4001(a)(3) of ERISA, which is
contributed to by (or to which there is or may be an obligation to contribute of) the Borrower or an ERISA Affiliate. 

“Non-Continuing Lender” means, at any time, each Lender which is not a Continuing Lender at such time. 

“Non-Declared Restricted Payment” means, as to any Person, (a) the redemption, retirement, purchase, or
other acquisition, directly or indirectly, for a consideration, of any shares of any class of its capital stock or of any other Equity Interests of such Person outstanding on the Effective Date or thereafter (or any warrants for or options or stock
or similar appreciation rights in respect of any such shares or Equity Interests but not including any convertible debt) or the setting aside of any funds for any of the foregoing purposes and (b) the making or payment of any other Restricted
Payment on or after the Effective Date by such Person which, in the case of either clause (a) or (b), does not require or involve a declaration or authorization by such Person. 

“Non-Guarantor Subsidiary” means, at any time, any Subsidiary of the Borrower that is not at such time a
Subsidiary Guarantor. Schedule 3.12 sets forth the name of each Subsidiary that is a “Non-Guarantor Subsidiary” on the Effective Date. 

“Non-U.S. Lender” means a Lender that is not a U.S. Person. 

“Obligations” means (a) all amounts, direct or indirect, contingent or absolute, of every type or
description, and at any time existing, owing to any Lead Agent, any Issuing Bank, any Swingline Lender or any Lender pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or any other Loan Document and (b) all Designated Swap Obligations, in the case of each
of clauses (a) and (b), (including monetary obligations incurred during the pendency of any bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or other similar proceeding, regardless of whether allowed or allowable in such proceeding); provided that,
the Obligations shall exclude any and all Excluded Swap Obligations. 

  
 19 








 “OFAC” means the U.S. Treasury Department Office of Foreign
Assets Control. 
 “Officers’ Certificate” means a certificate signed by any Financial Officer of the
Borrower. 
 “Other Connection Taxes” means, with respect to any Recipient, Taxes imposed as a result of a
present or former connection between such Recipient and the jurisdiction imposing such Taxes (other than a connection arising from such Recipient having executed, delivered, enforced, become a party to, performed its obligations under, received
payments under, received or perfected a security interest under, or engaged in any other transaction pursuant to, or enforced, any Loan Document, or sold or assigned an interest in any Loan Document). 

“Other Taxes” means any present or future stamp, court, documentary, intangible, recording, filing or similar
excise or property Taxes that arise from any payment made under, from the execution, delivery, performance, enforcement or registration of, or from the registration, receipt or perfection of a security interest under, or otherwise with respect to,
any Loan Document, except any such Taxes that are Other Connection Taxes imposed with respect to an assignment (other than an assignment under Section 2.18(b)). 

“Participant” has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 9.04. 

“PATRIOT Act” has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 9.14. 

“PBGC” means the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation referred to and defined in ERISA and any successor
entity performing similar functions. 
 “Permitted Litigation Bonding” means the making of deposits with
the proceeds of Loans and/or the issuance of Letters of Credit, in each case for the purposes of bonding litigation judgments entered against the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries on and after the Effective Date. 

“Permitted Obligations” means obligations (a) to pay taxes, (b) to pay import duties, to post
customs bonds and otherwise make payments in connection with customs and trade laws, (c) to purchase equipment or fixtures and otherwise make capital expenditures, (d) to make payments in connection with the importation or purchase of
tobacco or other products or goods for use in the day-to-day operations of the Borrower and any Subsidiary of the Borrower consistent with the practices of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries in effect prior to the Effective Date or with then current
practices in the industry, (e) to make utility payments, (f) in connection with worker’s compensation obligations or other employee disability obligations, (g) to provide credit support for any of the foregoing, (h) in
respect of employee loans made in connection with transfers, (i) to provide credit support for suppliers and distributors in the ordinary course of business, and (j) to support Indebtedness supported by Existing Letters of Credit on the
Effective Date. 
 “Person” means any natural person, corporation, limited liability company, trust, joint
venture, association, company, partnership, Governmental Authority or other entity. 
 “Plan” means any
employee pension benefit plan (other than a Multiemployer Plan) subject to the provisions of Title IV of ERISA or Section 412 of the Code or Section 302 of ERISA, and in respect of which the Borrower or any ERISA Affiliate is (or, if
such plan were terminated, would under Section 4069 of ERISA be deemed to be) an “employer” as defined in Section 3(5) of ERISA. 

  
 20 








 “Pounds Sterling” and the sign “£” each
mean the freely transferable lawful money of the United Kingdom. 
 “Prime Rate” means the rate of interest
per annum publicly announced from time to time by JPMCB as its prime rate in effect at its office located at 270 Park Avenue, New York, New York; each change in the Prime Rate shall be effective from and including the date such change is publicly
announced as being effective. 
 “Principal Property” means land, land improvements, buildings and
associated factory and laboratory equipment owned or leased pursuant to a capital lease and used by the Borrower or a Subsidiary primarily for processing, producing, packaging or storing its products, raw materials, inventories, or other materials
and supplies and located within the United States of America and having an acquisition cost plus capitalized improvements in excess of 2.0% of Consolidated Net Worth, but not including any such property financed through the issuance of tax exempt
governmental obligations, or any such property that has been determined by a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors not to be of material importance to the respective businesses conducted by the Borrower or such Subsidiary effective as of the
date such resolution is adopted. 
 “Qualifying Settlement” means, at any time, any settlement of the
payment terms of a judgment pursuant to a valid, binding and enforceable settlement agreement (a) which (i) has been approved by a court of competent jurisdiction in a final decision, which decision remains in full force and effect and has
not then been appealed, (ii) approval thereof is not required to be obtained by a court of competent jurisdiction in order to be valid, binding and enforceable under applicable law or by the terms of such settlement agreement, or (iii) has
been or will be submitted for approval by a court of competent jurisdiction within any time period prescribed by applicable law or such settlement agreement and the terms of such settlement otherwise remain subject to a valid, binding and
enforceable settlement agreement pending such court approval (unless and until such court has decided not to approve such settlement agreement), and (b) under which the Borrower and its Subsidiaries, as applicable, have complied with all
payment and other obligations. 
 “Recipient” means, as applicable, (a) the Administrative Agent,
(b) any Lender and (c) any Issuing Bank. 
 “Reference Period” has the meaning assigned to such
term in the definition of “Consolidated EBITDA”. 
 “Register” has the meaning assigned to such
term in Section 9.04. 
 “Regulation D” means Regulation D of the Board as from time to time in effect
and any successor to all or a portion thereof establishing reserve requirements. 
 “Regulation T” means
Regulation T of the Board as from time to time in effect and any successor to all or a portion thereof. 

“Regulation U” means Regulation U of the Board as from time to time in effect and any successor to all or a
portion thereof establishing margin requirements. 

  
 21 








 “Regulation X” means Regulation X of the Board as from time to
time in effect and any successor to all or a portion thereof. 
 “Related Parties” means, with respect to
any specified Person, such Person’s Affiliates and the respective directors, officers, employees, agents and advisors of such Person and such Person’s Affiliates. 

“Required Lenders” means, at any time, Lenders having Revolving Credit Exposures and Unused Availability
representing more than 50.0% of the sum of the total Revolving Credit Exposures and total Unused Availability at such time. 

“Requirement of Law” means, as to any Person, the Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws or other
organizational or governing documents of such Person, and any law, treaty, rule or regulation or determination of an arbitrator or a court or other Governmental Authority, in each case applicable to or binding upon such Person or any of its property
or to which such Person or any of its property is subject. 
 “Responsible Officer” means the chief
executive officer, president or any Financial Officer of the Borrower. 
 “Restricted Payment” means any
dividend or other distribution (whether in cash, securities or other property) with respect to any Equity Interests in the Borrower or any Subsidiary, or any payment (whether in cash, securities or other property), including any sinking fund or
similar deposit, on account of the purchase, redemption, retirement, acquisition, cancellation or termination of any such Equity Interests in the Borrower or any option, warrant or other right to acquire any such Equity Interests in the Borrower.

 “Revaluation Date” means (a) with respect to any Loan, each of the following: (i) each date of
a Borrowing, (ii) each date of a continuation or conversion of a Loan pursuant to Section 2.07 and (iii) such additional dates as the Administrative Agent shall determine or the Required Lenders shall require (provided that,
unless an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, no such additional date of determination shall be required more frequently than weekly); and (b) with respect to any Letter of Credit, each of the following: (i) each date of
issuance of a Letter of Credit, (ii) each date of an amendment, extension or renewal of any such Letter of Credit, (iii) each date of any LC Disbursement by an Issuing Bank under any Letter of Credit denominated in an Approved Alternate
Currency and (iv) such additional dates as the Administrative Agent shall determine or the Required Lenders shall require (provided that, unless an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, no such additional date of determination
shall be required more frequently than weekly); provided, subject to the rights of the Administrative Agent and the Required Lenders pursuant to preceding clauses (a)(iii) and (b)(iv), for purposes of determining compliance with Sections
2.09(b) and calculating fees pursuant to Section 2.11(a) or (b), the “Revaluation Date” shall be the first Business Day of each calendar month. 

“Revolving Credit Exposure” means, with respect to any Lender at any time, the sum of the outstanding
principal amount of such Lender’s Revolving Loans and its LC Exposure and Swingline Exposure at such time. 

“Revolving Loan” means a Loan made pursuant to Section 2.03. 

“RJRTH” means R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned Subsidiary of
the Borrower. 

  
 22 








 “S&P” means Standard & Poor’s. 

“SEC” means the Securities and Exchange Commission and any successor thereto. 

“Spot Rate” means, for a currency, the rate determined by the Administrative Agent to be the rate quoted by
the Administrative Agent as the spot rate for the purchase by the Administrative Agent of such currency with another currency through its principal foreign exchange trading office at approximately 11:00 a.m. on the date two Business Days prior to
the date as of which the foreign exchange computation is made (or, if the Administrative Agent does not have as of the date of determination a spot buying rate for any such currency, such spot rate from another financial institution as may be
designated by the Administrative Agent), provided that for purposes of any calculation of LC Exposure used in the determination of “Required Lenders” (or the component definitions as used therein) or the Dollar Equivalent of any LC
Disbursement under a Letter of Credit denominated in an Approved Alternate Currency, the Administrative Agent may use such spot rate quoted on the date as of which the foreign exchange computation is made. 

“Stated Amount” means, as to any Letter of Credit at any time, the maximum amount available to be drawn
thereunder (in each case determined (i) without regard to whether any conditions to drawing thereunder could then be met, (ii) after giving effect to any step-up or increase in the maximum amount to be made available under such Letter of
Credit after the issuance thereof, regardless of whether or not such step-up or increase has in fact occurred at such time but (iii) after giving effect to all previous drawings made thereunder); provided that the “Stated
Amount” of each Letter of Credit denominated in an Approved Alternate Currency shall be, on any date of calculation, the Dollar Equivalent of the maximum amount available to be drawn in the applicable Approved Alternate Currency thereunder
(determined (i) without regard to whether any conditions to drawing thereunder could then be met, (ii) after giving effect to any step-up or increase in the maximum amount to be made available under such Letter of Credit after the issuance
thereof, regardless of whether or not such step-up or increase has in fact occurred at such time but (iii) after giving effect to all previous drawings made thereunder). 

“Statutory Reserve Rate” means a fraction (expressed as a decimal), the numerator of which is the number one
and the denominator of which is the number one minus the aggregate of the maximum reserve percentage (including any marginal, special, emergency or supplemental reserves) expressed as a decimal established by the Board to which the Administrative
Agent is subject with respect to the Adjusted LIBO Rate, for eurocurrency funding (currently referred to as “Eurocurrency Liabilities” in Regulation D of the Board). Such reserve percentage shall include those imposed pursuant to such
Regulation D. Eurodollar Loans shall be deemed to constitute eurocurrency funding and to be subject to such reserve requirements without benefit of or credit for proration, exemptions or offsets that may be available from time to time to any
Lender under such Regulation D or any comparable regulation. The Statutory Reserve Rate shall be adjusted automatically on and as of the effective date of any change in any reserve percentage. 

“Subsidiary” means, with respect to any Person (the “parent”) at any date, (a) any
corporation, limited liability company, partnership, association or other entity the accounts of which would be consolidated with those of the parent in the parent’s consolidated financial statements if such financial statements were prepared
in accordance with GAAP as of such date, and (b) any other corporation, limited liability company, partnership, association or other entity of which securities or other ownership interests representing more than 50.0% of the equity or more than
50.0% of the ordinary voting power or, in the case of a partnership, more than 50.0% of the general partnership interests are, as of such date, owned, controlled or held. Unless otherwise expressly provided, all references herein to
“Subsidiary” shall mean a Subsidiary of the Borrower. 

  
 23 








 “Subsidiary Guarantor” means (a) each Material Subsidiary
of the Borrower as of the Effective Date and (b) each other Subsidiary of the Borrower which executes and delivers the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement, in each case under the immediately preceding clauses (a) and (b), unless and until such
time as the respective Subsidiary ceases to constitute a Subsidiary or is released from all of its obligations under the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement in accordance with the terms and provisions hereof and thereof. 

“Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement” means the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement substantially in the form of
Exhibit B entered into (or to be entered into) by one or more Subsidiaries. 
 “Swap Agreement” means any
agreement with respect to any swap, forward, future or derivative transaction or option or similar agreement involving, or settled by reference to, one or more rates, currencies, commodities, equity or debt instruments or securities, or economic,
financial or pricing indices or measures of economic, financial or pricing risk or value or any similar transaction or any combination of these transactions (including, without limitation, transactions to hedge or mitigate interest rate risk);
provided that no phantom stock or similar plan providing for payments only on account of services provided by current or former directors, officers, employees or consultants of the Borrower or the Subsidiaries shall be a Swap Agreement. 

“Swap Obligation” means, with respect to any Subsidiary Guarantor, any obligation to pay or perform under any
agreement, contract or transaction that constitutes a “swap” within the meaning of Section 1a(47) of the Commodity Exchange Act. 

“Swingline Availability Period” means, as to any Swingline Lender, the period from and including the
Effective Date to and including the earlier of the Swingline Maturity Date of such Swingline Lender and any other date of termination of its Swingline Commitment or the Commitments. 

“Swingline Commitment” means, at any time, for each Swingline Lender, the commitment of such Swingline Lender
to make Swingline Loans in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed the lesser of (i) the Commitment of such Swingline Lender (in its capacity as a Lender) at such time and (ii) $100,000,000, as the same may be reduced and/or adjusted
from time to time pursuant to Section 2.08, Article VII and/or Section 9.04. 
 “Swingline
Exposure” means, at any time, the aggregate principal amount of all Swingline Loans outstanding at such time. The Swingline Exposure of any Lender at any time shall be its Applicable Percentage of the total Swingline Exposure at such time.

 “Swingline Lender” means each of JPMCB and Citibank in its capacity as lender of Swingline Loans
hereunder. 
 “Swingline Loan” means a Loan made pursuant to Section 2.04. 

“Swingline Maturity Date” means, as to any Swingline Lender, the date which is five Business Days prior to
the Maturity Date of such Swingline Lender (in its capacity as a Lender). 
 “Syndication Agent” means
Citibank, in its capacity as syndication agent for the Facility. 
 “Taxes” means any present or future
taxes, levies, imposts, duties, deductions, withholdings, assessments, or other charges of a similar nature imposed by any Governmental Authority, including any interest, additions to tax or penalties applicable thereto. 

  
 24 








 “Total Commitment” means, at any time, the sum of the
Commitments of each of the Lenders at such time. 
 “Transactions” means the execution, delivery and
performance by each Loan Party of the applicable Loan Documents, the borrowing of Loans, the use of the proceeds thereof and the issuance of Letters of Credit hereunder. 

“Type”, when used in reference to any Loan or Borrowing, refers to whether the rate of interest on such Loan,
or on the Loans comprising such Borrowing, is determined by reference to the Adjusted LIBO Rate or the Alternate Base Rate. 

“Unrestricted” means, when referring to cash or Marketable Investments of the Borrower or any Subsidiary,
that such cash or Marketable Investments (a) do not appear (and are not required to appear) as “restricted” on a consolidated balance sheet of the Borrower, (b) are not subject to any Lien in favor of any Person (other than Liens
constituting customary set-off rights in favor of banks, custodians and other financial institutions on cash management and operating accounts maintained by the Borrower and its Subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business) and (c) are
otherwise generally available for use by the Borrower or such Subsidiary. 
 “Unsettled” means, with
respect to any judgment, that such judgment is not subject to a Qualifying Settlement. 
 “Unused
Availability” means, at any time, an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (a) the aggregate amount of the Commitments of all Lenders at such time over (b) the sum of the aggregate Revolving Credit Exposures of all Lenders at
such time. 
 “U.S. Dollars” and the sign “$” each mean the freely transferrable lawful
currency of the United States of America. 
 “U.S. Person” means a “United States person” within
the meaning of Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code. 
 “U.S. Tax Certificate” has the meaning assigned to
such term in Section 2.16(f)(ii)(D)(2). 
 “Withdrawal Liability” means liability to a Multiemployer
Plan as a result of a complete or partial withdrawal from such Multiemployer Plan, as such terms are defined in Part I of Subtitle E of Title IV of ERISA. 

“Withholding Agent” means any Loan Party and the Administrative Agent. 

SECTION 1.02. Classification of Loans and Borrowings. 

For purposes of this Agreement, Loans may be classified and referred to by Class (e.g., a “Revolving Loan”)
or by Type (e.g., a “Eurodollar Loan”) or by Class and Type (e.g., a “Eurodollar Revolving Loan”). Borrowings also may be classified and referred to by Class (e.g., a “Revolving Borrowing”) or
by Type (e.g., a “Eurodollar Borrowing”) or by Class and Type (e.g., a “Eurodollar Revolving Borrowing”). 

  
 25 








 SECTION 1.03. Terms Generally. 

The definitions of terms herein shall apply equally to the singular and plural forms of the terms defined. Whenever the
context may require, any pronoun shall include the corresponding masculine, feminine and neuter forms. The words “include”, “includes” and “including” shall be deemed to be followed by the phrase “without
limitation”. The word “will” shall be construed to have the same meaning and effect as the word “shall”. Unless the context requires otherwise, (a) any definition of or reference to any agreement, instrument or other
document herein shall be construed as referring to such agreement, instrument or other document as from time to time amended, supplemented or otherwise modified (subject to any restrictions on such amendments, supplements or modifications set forth
herein), (b) any reference herein to any Person shall be construed to include such Person’s successors and assigns, (c) the words “herein”, “hereof” and “hereunder”, and words of similar import, shall be
construed to refer to this Agreement in its entirety and not to any particular provision hereof, (d) all references herein to Articles, Sections, Exhibits and Schedules shall be construed to refer to Articles and Sections of, and Exhibits and
Schedules to, this Agreement and (e) the words “asset” and “property” shall be construed to have the same meaning and effect and to refer to any and all tangible and intangible assets and properties, including cash,
securities, accounts and contract rights. 
 SECTION 1.04. Accounting Terms; GAAP. 

(a) The financial statements to be furnished to the Administrative Agent (for the benefit of the Lenders) pursuant hereto
shall be made and prepared in accordance with GAAP consistently applied throughout the periods involved (except as set forth in the notes thereto or as otherwise disclosed in writing by the Borrower to the Administrative Agent). Except as otherwise
expressly provided herein, all terms of an accounting or financial nature (including all computations determining compliance with Section 6 (and the definitions used therein) shall be construed in accordance with GAAP, as in effect from time to
time; provided that, if the Borrower notifies the Administrative Agent that the Borrower requests an amendment to any provision hereof to eliminate the effect of any change occurring after the date hereof in GAAP or in the application thereof
on the operation of such provision (or if the Administrative Agent notifies the Borrower that the Required Lenders request an amendment to any provision hereof for such purpose), regardless of whether any such notice is given before or after such
change in GAAP or in the application thereof, then such provision shall be interpreted on the basis of GAAP as in effect and applied immediately before such change shall have become effective until such notice shall have been withdrawn or such
provision amended in accordance herewith. 
 (b) Notwithstanding any other provision contained herein, (i) all terms of
an accounting or financial nature used herein shall be construed, and all computations of amounts and ratios referred to herein shall be made, without giving effect to any election under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 159 (or any other
Financial Accounting Standard having a similar result or effect) to value any Indebtedness or other liabilities of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries at “fair value”, as defined therein and (ii) for purposes of the computations
determining compliance with Section 6, all expenses and other charges arising from any settlement of liability with respect to tobacco litigation which are required by GAAP to be retroactively applied to a previous fiscal quarter of the
Borrower shall instead be accrued in the fiscal quarter in which such expenses and charges occur. 
 SECTION 1.05.
Exchange Rates; Change of Currency. 
 (a) The Administrative Agent shall determine the Spot Rates as of each
Revaluation Date to be used for calculating the Dollar Equivalent of LC Exposure relating to Letters of Credit denominated in Approved Alternate Currencies. Such Spot Rates shall become effective as of such Revaluation Date and shall be the Spot
Rates employed in converting any amounts between the applicable currencies until the next Revaluation Date to occur. Except for purposes of financial statements delivered by Loan Parties hereunder or calculating financial covenants hereunder or
except as otherwise provided herein, the applicable amount of any currency (other than U.S. Dollars) for purposes of the Loan Documents shall be such Dollar Equivalent amount as so determined by the Administrative Agent. 

  
 26 








 (b) Each provision of this Agreement shall be subject to such reasonable changes
of construction as the Administrative Agent may from time to time specify to be appropriate to reflect the (i) adoption of the Euro by any member state of the European Union and any relevant market conventions or practices relating to the Euro
or (ii) a change in currency of any other country and any relevant market conventions or practices relating to the change in currency. 

ARTICLE II
 The
Credits 
 SECTION 2.01. Commitments. 

Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, each Lender severally agrees to make Revolving Loans in U.S. Dollars to
the Borrower from time to time during its Availability Period in an aggregate principal amount that will not result in (a) such Lender’s Revolving Credit Exposure exceeding such Lender’s Commitment or (b) the total Revolving
Credit Exposures exceeding the Total Commitment. Within the foregoing limits and subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the Borrower may borrow, prepay and reborrow Revolving Loans. 

SECTION 2.02. Loans and Borrowings. 

(a) Each Revolving Loan shall be made as part of a Borrowing consisting of Revolving Loans made by the Lenders ratably in
accordance with their respective Commitments. The failure of any Lender to make any Loan required to be made by it shall not relieve any other Lender of its obligations hereunder; provided that the Commitments of the Lenders are several and
no Lender shall be responsible for any other Lender’s failure to make Loans as required. 
 (b) Subject to
Section 2.13, each Revolving Borrowing shall be comprised entirely of ABR Loans or Eurodollar Loans as the Borrower may request in accordance herewith. Each Swingline Loan shall be an ABR Loan. Each Lender at its option may make any Eurodollar
Loan by causing any domestic or foreign branch or Affiliate of such Lender to make such Loan; provided that any exercise of such option shall not affect the obligation of the Borrower to repay such Loan in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement. 
 (c) At the commencement of each Interest Period for any Eurodollar Revolving Borrowing, such Borrowing shall
be in an aggregate amount that is an integral multiple of $1,000,000 and not less than $5,000,000. At the time that each ABR Revolving Borrowing is made, such Borrowing shall be in an aggregate amount that is an integral multiple of $1,000,000 and
not less than $5,000,000; provided that an ABR Revolving Borrowing may be in an aggregate amount that is equal to the entire Unused Availability or that is required to finance the reimbursement of an LC Disbursement as contemplated by
Section 2.05(f). Each Swingline Loan shall be in an amount that is an integral multiple of $100,000 and not less than $1,000,000. Borrowings of more than one Type and Class may be outstanding at the same time; provided that there shall
not at any time be more than a total of 15 Eurodollar Revolving Borrowings outstanding. 
 (d) Notwithstanding any other
provision of this Agreement, the Borrower shall not be entitled to request, or to elect to convert or continue, any Borrowing if the Interest Period requested with respect thereto would end after the Maturity Date of any Lender. 

  
 27 








 SECTION 2.03. Requests for Revolving Borrowings. 

To request a Revolving Borrowing, the Borrower shall notify the Administrative Agent of such request by telephone (a) in
the case of a Eurodollar Borrowing, not later than 11:00 a.m., New York City time, three Business Days before the date of the proposed Borrowing or (b) in the case of an ABR Borrowing, not later than 11:00 a.m., New York City time,
one Business Day before the date of the proposed Borrowing; provided that any such notice of an ABR Revolving Borrowing to finance the reimbursement of an LC Disbursement as contemplated by Section 2.05(f) may be given not later than
10:00 a.m., New York City time, on the date of the proposed Borrowing. Each such telephonic Borrowing Request shall be irrevocable and shall be confirmed promptly by hand delivery or telecopy to the Administrative Agent of a written Borrowing
Request in a form approved by the Administrative Agent and signed by the Borrower. Each such telephonic and written Borrowing Request shall specify the following information in compliance with Section 2.02: 

(i) the aggregate amount of the requested Borrowing; 

(ii) the date of such Borrowing, which shall be a Business Day; 

(iii) whether such Borrowing is to be an ABR Borrowing or a Eurodollar Borrowing; 

(iv) in the case of a Eurodollar Borrowing, the initial Interest Period to be applicable thereto, which shall
be a period contemplated by the definition of the term “Interest Period”; and 
 (v) the location
and number of the Borrower’s account to which funds are to be disbursed, which shall comply with the requirements of Section 2.06. 

If no election as to the Type of Revolving Borrowing is specified, then the requested Revolving Borrowing shall be an ABR Borrowing. If no
Interest Period is specified with respect to any requested Eurodollar Revolving Borrowing, then the Borrower shall be deemed to have selected an Interest Period of one month’s duration. Promptly following receipt of a Borrowing Request in
accordance with this Section, the Administrative Agent shall advise each Lender of the details thereof and of the amount of such Lender’s Loan to be made as part of the requested Borrowing. 

SECTION 2.04. Swingline Loans. 

(a) Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, each Swingline Lender severally agrees to make Swingline Loans
in U.S. Dollars to the Borrower from time to time during its Swingline Availability Period, in an aggregate principal amount at any time outstanding that will not result in (i) the aggregate principal amount of outstanding Swingline Loans made
by such Swingline Lender exceeding the Swingline Commitment of such Swingline Lender and (ii) the total Revolving Credit Exposures exceeding the Total Commitment; provided that no Swingline Lender shall be required to make a Swingline
Loan to refinance an outstanding Swingline Loan. Within the foregoing limits and subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the Borrower may borrow, prepay and reborrow Swingline Loans. Each Swingline Loan shall be made as part of a
Borrowing consisting of Swingline Loans made by the Swingline Lenders ratably in accordance with their respective Swingline Commitments. The failure of any Swingline Lender to make any Swingline Loan required to be made by it shall not relieve any
other Swingline Lender of its obligations hereunder; provided that the Swingline Commitments of the Swingline Lenders are several and no Swingline Lender shall be responsible for any other Swingline Lender’s failure to make Swingline
Loans as required. Notwithstanding anything to the 

  
 28 








 
contrary contained herein, no Swingline Lender shall make a Swingline Loan after it has received written notice from the Borrower, any other Loan Party or the Required Lenders stating that a
Default or an Event of Default exists and is continuing (or any other condition to the funding of a Swingline Loan in Section 4.02 cannot be satisfied) until such time as such Swingline Lender shall have received written notice of
(i) rescission of all such notices from the party or parties originally delivering such notice or notices or (ii) the waiver of such Default or Event of Default (or condition to such funding) by the Required Lenders. 

(b) To request a Swingline Loan, the Borrower shall notify the Administrative Agent of such request by telephone (confirmed by
telecopy), not later than 12:00 noon, New York City time, on the day of a proposed Swingline Loan. Each such notice shall be irrevocable and shall specify the requested date (which shall be a Business Day) and the amount of the requested Swingline
Loan. The Administrative Agent will promptly advise each Swingline Lender of any such notice received from the Borrower and of the amount of such Swingline Lender’s Swingline Loan to be made as part of the requested Borrowing. Each Swingline
Lender shall make each Swingline Loan available to the Borrower by means of a credit to the general deposit account of the Borrower with such Swingline Lender (or as otherwise agreed by such Swingline Lender and the Borrower or, in the case of a
Swingline Loan made to finance the reimbursement of an LC Disbursement as provided in Section 2.05(f), by remittance to the applicable Issuing Bank) by 3:00 p.m., New York City time, on the requested date of such Swingline Loan. 

(c) Each Swingline Lender may by written notice given to the Administrative Agent not later than 10:00 a.m., New York City
time, on any Business Day require the Lenders to acquire participations on such Business Day in all or a portion of the outstanding Swingline Loans made by such Swingline Lender. Such notice shall specify the aggregate amount of Swingline Loans in
which Lenders will participate. Promptly upon receipt of such notice, the Administrative Agent will give notice thereof to each Lender, specifying in such notice such Lender’s Applicable Percentage of such Swingline Loan or Swingline Loans.
Each Lender hereby absolutely and unconditionally agrees, upon receipt of notice as provided above, to pay to the Administrative Agent, for the account of the applicable Swingline Lender, such Lender’s Applicable Percentage of such Swingline
Loan or Swingline Loans. Each Lender acknowledges and agrees that its obligation to acquire participations in Swingline Loans pursuant to this Section 2.04(c) is absolute and unconditional and shall not be affected by any circumstance
whatsoever, including the occurrence and continuance of a Default or reduction or termination of the Commitments, and that each such payment shall be made without any offset, abatement, withholding or reduction whatsoever. Each Lender shall comply
with its obligation under this Section 2.04(c) by wire transfer of immediately available funds, in the same manner as provided in Section 2.06 with respect to Loans made by such Lender (and Section 2.06 shall apply, mutatis
mutandis, to the payment obligations of the Lenders), and the Administrative Agent shall promptly pay to the applicable Swingline Lender the amounts so received by it from the Lenders. The Administrative Agent shall notify the Borrower of any
participations in any Swingline Loan acquired pursuant to this Section 2.04(c), and thereafter payments in respect of such Swingline Loan shall be made to the Administrative Agent and not to the applicable Swingline Lender. Any amounts received
by the applicable Swingline Lender from the Borrower (or other party on behalf of the Borrower) in respect of a Swingline Loan after receipt by such Swingline Lender of the proceeds of a sale of participations therein shall be promptly remitted to
the Administrative Agent; any such amounts received by the Administrative Agent shall be promptly remitted by the Administrative Agent to the Lenders that shall have made their payments pursuant to this Section 2.04(c) and to the applicable
Swingline Lender, as their interests may appear; provided that any such payment so remitted shall be repaid to the applicable Swingline Lender or to the Administrative Agent, as applicable, if and to the extent such payment is required to be
refunded to the Borrower for any reason. The purchase of participations in a Swingline Loan pursuant to this Section 2.04(c) shall not relieve the Borrower of any default in the payment thereof. 

  
 29 








 SECTION 2.05. Letters of Credit. 

(a) General. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the Borrower may request the issuance of
Letters of Credit denominated in U.S. Dollars or an Approved Alternate Currency for its own account, in a form reasonably acceptable to the Administrative Agent and the applicable Issuing Bank, at any time and from time to time during the LC
Availability Period of such Issuing Bank. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the terms and conditions of any form of letter of credit application or other agreement submitted by the Borrower to,
or entered into by the Borrower with, the applicable Issuing Bank relating to any Letter of Credit, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall control. 

(b) Notice of Issuance, Amendment, Renewal, Extension; Certain Conditions. To request the issuance of a Letter of
Credit (or the amendment, renewal or extension of an outstanding Letter of Credit), the Borrower shall hand deliver or telecopy (or transmit by electronic communication, if arrangements for doing so have been approved by the applicable Issuing Bank)
to the applicable Issuing Bank and the Administrative Agent (reasonably in advance of the requested date of issuance, amendment, renewal or extension) a notice requesting the issuance of a Letter of Credit, or identifying the Letter of Credit to be
amended, renewed or extended, and specifying the date of issuance, amendment, renewal or extension (which shall be a Business Day), the date on which such Letter of Credit is to expire (which shall comply with Section 2.05(c)), the amount of
such Letter of Credit, the currency in which such Letter of Credit is to be denominated, the name and address of the beneficiary thereof and such other information as shall be necessary to prepare, amend, renew or extend such Letter of Credit. If
requested by an Issuing Bank, the Borrower also shall submit a letter of credit application on such Issuing Bank’s standard form in connection with any request for a Letter of Credit. A Letter of Credit shall be issued, amended, renewed or
extended only if (and upon issuance, amendment, renewal or extension of each Letter of Credit the Borrower shall be deemed to represent and warrant that), after giving effect to such issuance, amendment, renewal or extension (i) the total LC
Exposure shall not exceed $300,000,000 and (ii) the total Revolving Credit Exposures shall not exceed the Total Commitment. 

(c) Expiration Date. Each Letter of Credit shall expire at or prior to the close of business on the earlier of
(i) the date one year after the date of the issuance of such Letter of Credit (or, in the case of any renewal or extension thereof, one year after such renewal or extension) and (ii) the LC Termination Date; provided that,
notwithstanding the foregoing, no Letter of Credit shall be issued (x) with an expiration date beyond the then Maturity Date of any Lender if after giving effect thereto the total Revolving Credit Exposures would exceed the Expected Total
Commitment in effect for each day on which such Letter of Credit is to be outstanding that occurs beyond such Maturity Date or (y) with an expiration date beyond the Business Day next preceding the then Maturity Date of the Issuing Bank thereof
(as to any Issuing Bank, its “LC Issuer Maturity Date”), provided, however, that, at the request of the Borrower, an Issuing Bank may in its sole discretion permit any Letter of Credit to have an expiration date after
the LC Termination Date by giving written notice of such permission to the Borrower, so long as upon the date of any request of the respective Issuing Bank the Borrower shall pay to the respective Issuing Bank an amount of cash and/or cash
equivalents acceptable to such Issuing Bank (in U.S. Dollars or the applicable Approved Alternate Currency as requested by such Issuing Bank) equal to 105% of the LC Exposure with respect to such Letter of Credit, such cash and cash equivalents to
be held as security for the obligations of the Borrower in respect of such Letter of Credit in a cash collateral account, and pursuant to cash collateral arrangements, satisfactory to such Issuing Bank. 

(d) Existing Letters of Credit. Schedule 2.05 contains a description of all letters of credit issued by any lender for
the account of the Borrower pursuant to the Existing Credit Agreement and outstanding on the Effective Date (and setting forth, with respect to each such letter of credit, (i) the name of the issuing lender, (ii) the letter of credit
number, (iii) the name(s) of the account party or account 

  
 30 








 
parties, (iv) the stated amount (including the currency in which such letter of credit is denominated), (v) the name of the beneficiary and (vi) the expiry date). Each such letter
of credit, including any extension or renewal thereof (each, as amended from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof and hereof, an “Existing Letter of Credit”) shall constitute a “Letter of Credit” issued for
the account of the Borrower for all purposes of this Agreement, issued, for purposes of Section 2.05, on the Effective Date and the respective issuer(s) thereof shall constitute “Issuing Bank(s)” with respect to such Letter of Credit
for all purposes of this Agreement. 
 (e) Participations. By the issuance or renewal of a Letter of Credit (or an
amendment to a Letter of Credit increasing the amount thereof) and without any further action on the part of any Issuing Bank or the Lenders, each Issuing Bank hereby grants to each Lender, and each Lender hereby acquires from such Issuing Bank, a
participation in such Letter of Credit equal to such Lender’s Applicable Percentage of the Stated Amount of such Letter of Credit. In consideration and in furtherance of the foregoing, each Lender hereby absolutely and unconditionally agrees to
pay to the Administrative Agent in U.S. Dollars, for the account of such Issuing Bank, such Lender’s Applicable Percentage of each LC Disbursement made by such Issuing Bank and not reimbursed by the Borrower on the date due as provided in
Section 2.05(f) or of any reimbursement payment required to be refunded to the Borrower for any reason (for this purpose, taking the Dollar Equivalent of any LC Disbursement or other reimbursement payment made in an Approved Alternate
Currency). Each Lender acknowledges and agrees that its obligation to acquire participations pursuant to this Section 2.05(e) in respect of Letters of Credit is absolute and unconditional and shall not be affected by any circumstance
whatsoever, including any amendment, renewal or extension of any Letter of Credit or the occurrence and continuance of a Default or reduction or termination of the Commitments, and that each such payment shall be made without any offset, abatement,
withholding or reduction whatsoever. 
 (f) Reimbursement. If any Issuing Bank shall make any LC Disbursement in
respect of a Letter of Credit, the Borrower shall reimburse such LC Disbursement by paying to the Administrative Agent in U.S. Dollars an amount equal to such LC Disbursement (for this purpose, taking the Dollar Equivalent of any LC Disbursement
made in an Approved Alternate Currency) not later than 12:00 noon, New York City time, on the date that such LC Disbursement is made, if the Borrower shall have received notice of such LC Disbursement prior to 10:00 a.m., New York City time, on such
date, or, if such notice has not been received by the Borrower prior to such time on such date, then not later than 12:00 noon, New York City time, on (i) the Business Day that the Borrower receives such notice, if such notice is received prior
to 10:00 a.m., New York City time, on the day of receipt, or (ii) the Business Day immediately following the day that the Borrower receives such notice, if such notice is not received prior to such time on the day of receipt; provided
that the Borrower may, subject to the conditions to borrowing set forth herein, request in accordance with Section 2.03 or 2.04 that such payment be financed with an ABR Revolving Borrowing or Swingline Loan in an equivalent amount and, to the
extent so financed, the Borrower’s obligation to make such payment shall be discharged and replaced by the resulting ABR Revolving Borrowing or Swingline Loan. If the Borrower fails to make such payment when due, the Administrative Agent shall
notify each Lender of the applicable LC Disbursement, the payment then due from the Borrower in respect thereof and such Lender’s Applicable Percentage thereof. Promptly following receipt of such notice, each Lender shall pay to the
Administrative Agent in U.S. Dollars its Applicable Percentage of the payment then due from the Borrower, in the same manner as provided in Section 2.06 with respect to Loans made by such Lender (and Section 2.06 shall apply, mutatis
mutandis, to the payment obligations of the Lenders), and the Administrative Agent shall promptly pay to such Issuing Bank the amounts so received by it from the Lenders. Promptly following receipt by the Administrative Agent of any payment from
the Borrower pursuant to this Section 2.05(f), the Administrative Agent shall distribute such payment to the applicable Issuing Bank or, to the extent that Lenders have made payments pursuant to this Section 2.05(f) to reimburse the
applicable Issuing Bank, then to such Lenders and such Issuing Bank as their interests may appear. Any payment made by a Lender pursuant to this Section 2.05(f) to reimburse an Issuing Bank for any LC Disbursement (other than the funding of ABR
Revolving Loans or a Swingline Loan as contemplated above) shall not constitute a Loan and shall not relieve the Borrower of its obligation to reimburse such LC Disbursement. 

  
 31 








 (g) Obligations Absolute. The Borrower’s obligation to reimburse LC
Disbursements as provided in Section 2.05(f) shall be absolute, unconditional and irrevocable, and shall be performed strictly in accordance with the terms of this Agreement under any and all circumstances whatsoever and irrespective of
(i) any lack of validity or enforceability of any Letter of Credit or this Agreement, or any term or provision therein, (ii) any draft or other document presented under a Letter of Credit proving to be forged, fraudulent or invalid in any
respect or any statement therein being untrue or inaccurate in any respect, (iii) payment by any Issuing Bank under a Letter of Credit against presentation of a draft or other document that does not comply with the terms of such Letter of
Credit, or (iv) any other event or circumstance whatsoever, whether or not similar to any of the foregoing, that might, but for the provisions of this Section 2.05, constitute a legal or equitable discharge of, or provide a right of setoff
against, the Borrower’s obligations hereunder. None of the Administrative Agent, the Lenders or any Issuing Bank, or any of their Related Parties, shall have any liability or responsibility by reason of or in connection with the issuance or
transfer of any Letter of Credit or any payment or failure to make any payment thereunder (irrespective of any of the circumstances referred to in the preceding sentence), or any error, omission, interruption, loss or delay in transmission or
delivery of any draft, notice or other communication under or relating to any Letter of Credit (including any document required to make a drawing thereunder), any error in interpretation of technical terms or any consequence arising from causes
beyond the control of any Issuing Bank; provided that the foregoing shall not be construed to excuse any Issuing Bank from liability to the Borrower to the extent of any direct damages (as opposed to consequential damages, claims in respect
of which are hereby waived by the Borrower to the extent permitted by applicable law) suffered by the Borrower that are caused by an Issuing Bank’s failure to exercise care when determining whether drafts and other documents presented under a
Letter of Credit comply with the terms thereof. The parties hereto expressly agree that, in the absence of gross negligence or willful misconduct on the part of the relevant Issuing Bank (as finally determined by a court of competent jurisdiction),
such Issuing Bank shall be deemed to have exercised care in each such determination. In furtherance of the foregoing and without limiting the generality thereof, the parties agree that, with respect to documents presented which appear on their face
to be in substantial compliance with the terms of a Letter of Credit, each Issuing Bank may, in its sole discretion, either accept and make payment upon such documents without responsibility for further investigation, regardless of any notice or
information to the contrary, or refuse to accept and make payment upon such documents if such documents are not in strict compliance with the terms of such Letter of Credit. 

(h) Disbursement Procedures. Each Issuing Bank shall, promptly following its receipt thereof, examine all documents
purporting to represent a demand for payment under a Letter of Credit. Each Issuing Bank shall promptly notify the Administrative Agent and the Borrower by telephone (confirmed by telecopy) of such demand for payment and whether such Issuing Bank
has made or will make an LC Disbursement thereunder; provided that any failure to give or delay in giving such notice shall not relieve the Borrower of its obligation to reimburse such Issuing Bank and the Lenders with respect to any such LC
Disbursement. 
 (i) Interim Interest. If any Issuing Bank shall make any LC Disbursement, then, unless the Borrower
shall reimburse such LC Disbursement in full on the date such LC Disbursement is made, the unpaid amount thereof shall bear interest, for each day from and including the date such LC Disbursement is made to but excluding the date that the Borrower
reimburses such LC Disbursement, at the rate per annum then applicable to ABR Revolving Loans; provided that, if the Borrower fails to reimburse such LC Disbursement when due pursuant to Section 2.05(f), then Section 2.12(c) shall
apply. Interest accrued pursuant to this paragraph shall be for the account of the relevant Issuing Bank, except that interest accrued on and after the date of payment by any Lender pursuant to Section 2.05(f) to reimburse an Issuing Bank shall
be for the account of such Lender to the extent of such payment. 

  
 32 








 (j) Replacement of Issuing Bank. Any Issuing Bank may be replaced at any
time by written agreement among the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, the replaced Issuing Bank and the successor Issuing Bank. The Administrative Agent shall notify the Lenders of any such replacement of any Issuing Bank. At the time any such
replacement shall become effective, the Borrower shall pay all unpaid fees accrued for the account of the replaced Issuing Bank pursuant to Section 2.11(b). From and after the effective date of any such replacement, (i) the successor
Issuing Bank shall have all the rights and obligations of an Issuing Bank under this Agreement with respect to Letters of Credit to be issued thereafter and (ii) references herein to the term “Issuing Bank” shall be deemed to refer to
such successor or to any previous Issuing Bank, or to such successor and all previous Issuing Banks, as the context shall require. After the replacement of an Issuing Bank hereunder, the replaced Issuing Bank shall remain a party hereto and shall
continue to have all the rights and obligations of an Issuing Bank under this Agreement with respect to Letters of Credit issued by it prior to such replacement, but shall not be required to issue additional Letters of Credit. 

(k) Cash Collateralization. If any Event of Default shall occur and be continuing, on the Business Day that the
Borrower receives notice from the Administrative Agent or the Required Lenders demanding the deposit of cash collateral pursuant to this Section 2.05(k), the Borrower shall deposit in an account with the Administrative Agent, in the name of the
Administrative Agent and for the benefit of the Lenders, an amount in cash (in U.S. Dollars or, if requested by the Administrative Agent in the case of any Letter of Credit denominated in an Approved Alternate Currency, such Approved Alternate
Currency) equal to the LC Exposure as of such date plus any accrued and unpaid interest thereon; provided that the obligation to deposit such cash collateral shall become effective immediately, and such deposit shall become immediately due
and payable, without demand or other notice of any kind, upon the occurrence of any Event of Default with respect to the Borrower described in clause (h) or (i) of Article VII. Such deposit shall be held by the Administrative Agent as
collateral for the payment and performance of the Obligations. The Administrative Agent shall have exclusive dominion and control, including the exclusive right of withdrawal, over such account. Such deposits shall not bear interest except for any
interest earned on the investment of such deposits, provided that any such investments (i) shall be made at the option and sole discretion of the Administrative Agent, (ii) must be approved in writing in advance by the Borrower, and
(iii) shall be at the Borrower’s risk and expense to the extent (and only to the extent) that such investments have been approved in advance in writing by the Borrower. Interest or profits, if any, on such investments shall accumulate in
such account. Moneys in such account shall be applied by the Administrative Agent to reimburse each Issuing Bank for LC Disbursements for which it has not been reimbursed and, to the extent not so applied, shall be held for the satisfaction of the
reimbursement obligations of the Borrower for the LC Exposure at such time or, if the maturity of the Loans has been accelerated (but subject to the consent of the Required Lenders), be applied to satisfy other Obligations. If the Borrower is
required to provide an amount of cash collateral hereunder as a result of the occurrence of an Event of Default, such amount, together with interest or profits, if any, thereon, shall (to the extent not applied as aforesaid) be returned to the
Borrower within three Business Days after all Events of Default have been cured or waived. 
 SECTION 2.06. Funding of
Borrowings. 
 (a) Each Lender shall make each Loan to be made by it hereunder on the proposed date thereof by wire
transfer of immediately available funds by 12:00 noon, New York City time, to the account of the Administrative Agent most recently designated by it for such purpose by notice to the Lenders; provided that Swingline Loans shall be made as
provided in Section 2.04. The Administrative Agent will make such Loans available to the Borrower by promptly crediting the amounts so received, in 

  
 33 








 
like funds, to an account of the Borrower maintained with the Administrative Agent in New York City and designated by the Borrower in the applicable Borrowing Request; provided that ABR
Revolving Loans made to finance the reimbursement of an LC Disbursement as provided in Section 2.05(f) shall be remitted by the Administrative Agent to the relevant Issuing Bank. 

(b) Unless the Administrative Agent shall have received notice from a Lender prior to the proposed date of any Borrowing that
such Lender will not make available to the Administrative Agent such Lender’s share of such Borrowing, the Administrative Agent may assume that such Lender has made such share available on such date in accordance with Section 2.06(a) and
may, in reliance upon such assumption, make available to the Borrower a corresponding amount. In such event, if a Lender has not in fact made its share of the applicable Borrowing available to the Administrative Agent, then the applicable Lender and
the Borrower severally agree to pay to the Administrative Agent forthwith on demand such corresponding amount with interest thereon, for each day from and including the date such amount is made available to the Borrower to but excluding the date of
payment to the Administrative Agent, at (i) in the case of such Lender, the greater of the Federal Funds Effective Rate and a rate determined by the Administrative Agent in accordance with banking industry rules on interbank compensation or
(ii) in the case of the Borrower, the interest rate applicable to ABR Loans. If such Lender pays such amount to the Administrative Agent, then such amount shall constitute such Lender’s Loan included in such Borrowing. 

SECTION 2.07. Interest Elections. 

(a) Each Revolving Borrowing initially shall be of the Type specified in the applicable Borrowing Request and, in the
case of a Eurodollar Revolving Borrowing, shall have an initial Interest Period as specified in such Borrowing Request. Thereafter, the Borrower may elect to convert such Borrowing to a different Type or to continue such Borrowing and, in the case
of a Eurodollar Revolving Borrowing, may elect Interest Periods therefor, all as provided in this Section. The Borrower may elect different options with respect to different portions of the affected Borrowing, in which case each such portion shall
be allocated ratably among the Lenders holding the Loans comprising such Borrowing, and the Loans comprising each such portion shall be considered a separate Borrowing. This Section shall not apply to Swingline Borrowings, which may not be converted
or continued. 
 (b) To make an election pursuant to this Section, the Borrower shall notify the Administrative Agent of
such election by telephone by the time that a Borrowing Request would be required under Section 2.03 if the Borrower were requesting a Revolving Borrowing of the Type resulting from such election to be made on the effective date of such
election. Each such telephonic Interest Election Request shall be irrevocable and shall be confirmed promptly by hand delivery or telecopy to the Administrative Agent of a written Interest Election Request in a form approved by the Administrative
Agent and signed by the Borrower. 
 (c) Each telephonic and written Interest Election Request shall specify the following
information in compliance with Section 2.02: 
 (i) the Revolving Borrowing to which such Interest
Election Request applies and, if different options are being elected with respect to different portions thereof, the portions thereof to be allocated to each resulting Revolving Borrowing (in which case the information to be specified pursuant to
clauses (iii) and (iv) below shall be specified for each resulting Revolving Borrowing); 
 (ii)
the effective date of the election made pursuant to such Interest Election Request, which shall be a Business Day; 

  
 34 








 (iii) whether the resulting Revolving Borrowing is to be an ABR
Revolving Borrowing or a Eurodollar Revolving Borrowing; and 
 (iv) if the resulting Revolving Borrowing is
a Eurodollar Revolving Borrowing, the Interest Period to be applicable thereto after giving effect to such election, which shall be a period contemplated by the definition of the term “Interest Period”. 

If any such Interest Election Request requests a Eurodollar Borrowing but does not specify an Interest Period, then the Borrower shall be
deemed to have selected an Interest Period of one month’s duration. 
 (d) Promptly following receipt of an Interest
Election Request, the Administrative Agent shall advise each Lender of the details thereof and of such Lender’s portion of each resulting Revolving Borrowing. 

(e) If the Borrower fails to deliver a timely Interest Election Request with respect to a Eurodollar Revolving Borrowing prior
to the end of the Interest Period applicable thereto, then, unless such Revolving Borrowing is repaid as provided herein, at the end of such Interest Period such Revolving Borrowing shall be converted to an ABR Revolving Borrowing. Notwithstanding
any contrary provision hereof, if an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing and the Administrative Agent, at the request of the Required Lenders, so notifies the Borrower, then, so long as an Event of Default is continuing (i) no
outstanding Revolving Borrowing may be converted to or continued as a Eurodollar Revolving Borrowing and (ii) unless repaid, each Eurodollar Revolving Borrowing shall be converted to an ABR Revolving Borrowing at the end of the Interest Period
applicable thereto. 
 SECTION 2.08. Termination and Reduction of Commitments. 

(a) Unless previously terminated, the Total Commitment shall terminate on the Final Maturity Date. 

(b) Unless previously terminated, the Commitment of each Lender shall terminate in its entirety on such Lender’s Maturity
Date. 
 (c) Unless previously terminated, the Swingline Commitment of each Swingline Lender shall terminate on the
Swingline Maturity Date of such Swingline Lender. 
 (d) The Borrower may at any time terminate, or from time to time
reduce, the Commitments; provided that (i) each reduction of the Commitments shall be in an amount that is an integral multiple of $1,000,000 and not less than $5,000,000, (ii) the Borrower shall not terminate or reduce the
Commitments if, after giving effect to any concurrent prepayment of the Loans in accordance with Section 2.10, the Revolving Credit Exposures would exceed the Total Commitment and (iii) at any time within the 30 days prior to the Maturity
Date of any Non-Continuing Lender and so long as no Event of Default then exists, the Borrower may terminate the Commitment of such Non-Continuing Lender, provided that (x) all Loans, together with unpaid accrued interest thereon and all
accrued but unpaid fees pursuant to Section 2.11, of such Non-Continuing Lender are repaid or paid, as applicable, in full and (y) after giving effect to such termination and repayment, the sum of the Revolving Credit Exposures does not
exceed the Total Commitment. 
 (e) The Borrower shall notify the Administrative Agent of any election to terminate or
reduce the Commitments under Section 2.08(d) at least three Business Days prior to the effective date of such termination or reduction, specifying such election and the effective date thereof. Promptly following receipt of any notice, the
Administrative Agent shall advise the Lenders of the contents thereof. 

  
 35 








 
Each notice delivered by the Borrower pursuant to this Section shall be irrevocable; provided that a notice of termination of the Commitments delivered by the Borrower may state that such
notice is conditioned upon the effectiveness of other credit facilities, in which case such notice may be revoked by the Borrower (by notice to the Administrative Agent on or prior to the specified effective date) if such condition is not satisfied.
Any termination or reduction of the Commitments shall be permanent. Each reduction of the Commitments pursuant to Section 2.08(d) shall be made ratably among the Lenders in accordance with their respective Commitments, except as expressly
provided in subclause (iii) of the proviso appearing in Section 2.08(d). 
 SECTION 2.09. Repayment of
Loans; Evidence of Debt. 
 (a) The Borrower hereby unconditionally promises to pay (i) to the Administrative
Agent for the account of each Lender the then unpaid principal amount of each Revolving Loan made by such Lender on such Lender’s Maturity Date and (ii) to each Swingline Lender the then unpaid principal amount of each Swingline Loan made
by such Swingline Lender on the Swingline Maturity Date of such Swingline Lender and the first date after such Swingline Loan is made that is the 15th or last day of a calendar month and is at least two Business Days after such Swingline Loan is
made; provided that on each date that a Revolving Borrowing is made, the Borrower shall repay all Swingline Loans then outstanding. 

(b) If on any date the sum of (i) the aggregate outstanding principal amount of Revolving Loans and Swingline Loans
(after giving effect to all other repayments thereof on such date) and (ii) the aggregate amount of LC Exposure on such date, exceeds the Total Commitment as then in effect, the Borrower shall repay on such date, the principal of Swingline
Loans, and if no Swingline Loans are or remain outstanding, the principal of Revolving Loans in an aggregate amount equal to such excess. If, after giving effect to the prepayment of all outstanding Swingline Loans and all outstanding Revolving
Loans, the aggregate amount of LC Exposure exceeds the Total Commitment as then in effect, the Borrower shall pay to the Administrative Agent (at its office identified in Section 2.17) on such date an amount in cash and/or cash equivalents (in
U.S. Dollars or, if requested by the Administrative Agent in the case of any LC Exposure with respect to a Letter of Credit denominated in an Approved Alternate Currency, such Approved Alternate Currency) equal to such excess (up to the aggregate
amount of LC Exposure at such time) and the Administrative Agent shall hold such payment as security for the Obligations of the Borrower to the Lenders hereunder pursuant to a cash collateral agreement to be entered into in form and substance
reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent. If the Borrower is required to provide an amount of cash collateral pursuant to this Section 2.09(b), such amount, together with interest or profits, if any, thereon, shall (so long as no
Default has occurred and is continuing) be returned to the Borrower within five Business Days after the date on which the requirements of the foregoing sentence would cease to require such cash collateralization. 

(c) Each Lender shall maintain in accordance with its usual practice an account or accounts evidencing the indebtedness of the
Borrower to such Lender resulting from each Loan made by such Lender, including the amounts of principal and interest payable and paid to such Lender from time to time hereunder. 

(d) The Administrative Agent shall maintain accounts in which it shall record (i) the amount of each Loan made hereunder,
the Class and Type thereof and the Interest Period applicable thereto, (ii) the amount of any principal or interest due and payable or to become due and payable from the Borrower to each Lender hereunder and (iii) the amount of any sum
received by the Administrative Agent hereunder for the account of the Lenders and each Lender’s share thereof. 

  
 36 








 (e) The entries made in the accounts maintained pursuant to Section 2.09(c)
or (d) shall be prima facie evidence of the existence and amounts of the obligations recorded therein; provided that the failure of any Lender or the Administrative Agent to maintain such accounts or any error therein shall not in
any manner affect the obligation of the Borrower to repay the Loans in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 
 (f)
Any Lender may request that Loans made by it be evidenced by a promissory note. In such event, the Borrower shall prepare, execute and deliver to such Lender a promissory note payable to such Lender (or, if requested by such Lender, to such Lender
and its registered assigns) and in a form approved by the Administrative Agent. Thereafter, the Loans evidenced by such promissory note and interest thereon shall at all times (including after assignment pursuant to Section 9.04) be represented
by one or more promissory notes in such form payable to the payee named therein (or to such payee and its registered assigns). 

SECTION 2.10. Prepayment of Loans. 

(a) The Borrower shall have the right at any time and from time to time to prepay any Borrowing in whole or in part,
subject to prior notice in accordance with Section 2.10(b). 
 (b) The Borrower shall notify the Administrative Agent
(and, in the case of prepayment of a Swingline Loan, each Swingline Lender) by telephone (confirmed by telecopy) of any prepayment hereunder (i) in the case of prepayment of a Eurodollar Revolving Borrowing, not later than 11:00 a.m., New York
City time, three Business Days before the date of prepayment, (ii) in the case of prepayment of an ABR Revolving Borrowing, not later than 11:00 a.m., New York City time, one Business Day before the date of prepayment or (iii) in the case
of prepayment of a Swingline Loan, not later than 12:00 noon, New York City time, on the date of prepayment. Each such notice shall be irrevocable and shall specify the prepayment date and the principal amount of each Borrowing or portion thereof to
be prepaid; provided that, if a notice of prepayment is given in connection with a conditional notice of termination of the Commitments as contemplated by Section 2.08, then such notice of prepayment may be revoked if such notice of
termination is revoked in accordance with Section 2.08. Promptly following receipt of any such notice relating to a Revolving Borrowing, the Administrative Agent shall advise the Lenders of the contents thereof. Each partial prepayment of any
Revolving Borrowing shall be in an amount that would be permitted in the case of an advance of a Revolving Borrowing of the same Type as provided in Section 2.02. Each prepayment of a Revolving Borrowing shall be applied ratably to the Loans
included in the prepaid Borrowing, provided that (x) at the Borrower’s election in connection with any prepayment pursuant to this Section 2.10(b), such prepayment shall not be applied to any Revolving Loan of a Defaulting
Lender and (y) the Borrower may repay the Revolving Loans of a Non-Continuing Lender in connection with the termination of the Commitments of such Non-Continuing Lender in accordance with the requirements of clause (iii) of the proviso
appearing in Section 2.08(d) without any accompanying repayment of the Revolving Loans of the other Lenders, so long as all amounts, if any, due and owing to such Lender (and any other Lenders) pursuant to Section 2.15 are paid at such
time. Each prepayment of a Swingline Borrowing shall be applied ratably to the Swingline Loans included in the prepaid Borrowing. Prepayments shall be accompanied by accrued interest to the extent required by Section 2.12. 

SECTION 2.11. Fees. 

(a) The Borrower agrees to pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of each Lender a facility fee (a
“Facility Fee”), which shall accrue at the Applicable Rate on the daily amount of the Commitment of such Lender (whether used or unused) during the period from and including the Effective Date to but excluding the date on which such
Commitment terminates; provided that, if such 

  
 37 








 
Lender continues to have any Revolving Credit Exposure after its Commitment terminates, then such Facility Fee shall continue to accrue on the daily amount of such Lender’s Revolving Credit
Exposure from and including the date on which its Commitment terminates to but excluding the date on which such Lender ceases to have any Revolving Credit Exposure. Accrued Facility Fees shall be payable in U.S. Dollars in arrears on the third
Business Day after the last day of March, June, September and December of each year and on the date on which the Commitment of the applicable Lender terminates, commencing on the first such date to occur after the date hereof; provided that
any Facility Fees accruing after the date on which the Commitment of such Lender terminates shall be payable on demand. All Facility Fees shall be computed on the basis of a year of 360 days and shall be payable for the actual number of days elapsed
(including the first day but excluding the last day). 
 (b) The Borrower agrees to pay (i) to the Administrative Agent
for the account of each Lender in U.S. Dollars a participation fee with respect to its participations in Letters of Credit, which shall accrue at the same Applicable Rate used to determine the interest rate applicable to Eurodollar Revolving Loans
on the average daily amount of such Lender’s LC Exposure (excluding any portion thereof attributable to unreimbursed LC Disbursements) during the period from and including the Effective Date to but excluding the later of the date on which such
Lender’s Commitment terminates and the date on which such Lender ceases to have any LC Exposure, and (ii) to each Issuing Bank in U.S. Dollars a fronting fee, which shall accrue at the rate or rates per annum separately agreed upon between
the Borrower and such Issuing Bank on the average daily amount of the LC Exposure with respect to Letters of Credit issued by such Issuing Bank (excluding any portion thereof attributable to unreimbursed LC Disbursements) during the period from and
including the Effective Date to but excluding the later of the date of the termination of the Commitment of such Issuing Bank and the date on which there ceases to be any LC Exposure with respect to Letters of Credit issued by such Issuing Bank, as
well as each Issuing Bank’s standard fees with respect to the issuance, amendment, renewal or extension of any Letter of Credit or processing of drawings thereunder. Participation fees and fronting fees accrued through and including the last
day of March, June, September and December of each year shall be payable on the third Business Day following such last day, commencing on the first such date to occur after the Effective Date; provided that all such fees shall be payable on
the date on which the Commitment of such Lender or Issuing Bank, as the case may be, terminates and any such fees accruing after the date on which such Commitment terminates shall be payable on demand. Any other fees payable to any Issuing Bank
pursuant to this Section 2.11(b) shall be payable within 10 days after demand. All participation fees and fronting fees shall be computed on the basis of a year of 360 days and shall be payable for the actual number of days elapsed (including
the first day but excluding the last day). 
 (c) The Borrower agrees to pay to the Administrative Agent, for its own
account, fees payable in the amounts and at the times separately agreed upon between the Borrower and the Administrative Agent. 

(d) All fees payable hereunder shall be paid on the dates due, in immediately available funds, to the Administrative Agent (or
to any Issuing Bank, in the case of fees payable to it) for distribution, in the case of Facility Fees and Letters of Credit participation fees, to the Lenders. Fees paid shall not be refundable under any circumstances. 

SECTION 2.12. Interest. 

(a) The Loans comprising each ABR Borrowing (including each Swingline Loan) shall bear interest at the Alternate
Base Rate plus the Applicable Rate. 

  
 38 








 (b) The Loans comprising each Eurodollar Revolving Borrowing shall bear interest
at the Adjusted LIBO Rate for the Interest Period in effect for such Revolving Borrowing plus the Applicable Rate. 
 (c)
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any principal of or interest on any Loan or any fee or other amount payable by the Borrower hereunder is not paid when due, whether at stated maturity, upon acceleration or otherwise, such overdue amount shall bear
interest, after as well as before judgment, at a rate per annum equal to (i) in the case of overdue principal of any Loan, 2.0% plus the rate otherwise applicable to such Loan as provided in the preceding clauses of this Section or (ii) in
the case of any other amount, 2.0% plus the rate applicable to ABR Loans as provided in Section 2.12(a). 
 (d) Accrued
interest on each Loan shall be payable in arrears on each Interest Payment Date for such Loan and upon termination of the Commitment of any Lender which has made such Loan (or, in the case of a Swingline Loan, the Swingline Commitment of any
Swingline Lender which made such Swingline Loan); provided that (i) interest accrued pursuant to Section 2.12(c) shall be payable on demand, (ii) in the event of any repayment or prepayment of any Loan (other than a prepayment
of an ABR Revolving Loan prior to the end of the Availability Period of the applicable Lenders), accrued interest on the principal amount repaid or prepaid shall be payable on the date of such repayment or prepayment and (iii) in the event of
any conversion of any Eurodollar Revolving Loan prior to the end of the current Interest Period therefor, accrued interest on such Loan shall be payable on the effective date of such conversion. 

(e) All interest hereunder shall be computed on the basis of a year of 360 days, except that interest computed by reference to
the Alternate Base Rate at times when the Alternate Base Rate is based on the Prime Rate shall be computed on the basis of a year of 365 days (or 366 days in a leap year), and in each case shall be payable for the actual number of days elapsed
(including the first day but excluding the last day). The applicable Alternate Base Rate, Adjusted LIBO Rate or LIBO Rate shall be determined by the Administrative Agent, and such determination shall be conclusive absent manifest error. 

SECTION 2.13. Alternate Rate of Interest. 

If prior to the commencement of any Interest Period for a Eurodollar Borrowing: 

(a) the Administrative Agent determines (which determination shall be conclusive absent manifest error) that adequate and
reasonable means do not exist for ascertaining the Adjusted LIBO Rate or the LIBO Rate, as applicable, for such Interest Period; or 

(b) the Administrative Agent is advised by the Required Lenders that the Adjusted LIBO Rate or the LIBO Rate, as applicable,
for such Interest Period will not adequately and fairly reflect the cost to such Lenders (or Lender) of making or maintaining their Loans (or its Loan) included in such Borrowing for such Interest Period; 

then the Administrative Agent shall give notice thereof to the Borrower and the Lenders by telephone or telecopy as promptly as practicable
thereafter and, until the Administrative Agent notifies the Borrower and the Lenders that the circumstances giving rise to such notice no longer exist, (i) any Interest Election Request that requests the conversion of any Revolving Borrowing
to, or continuation of any Revolving Borrowing as, a Eurodollar Borrowing shall be ineffective and (ii) if any Borrowing Request requests a Eurodollar Revolving Borrowing, such Borrowing shall be made as an ABR Borrowing; provided that
if the circumstances giving rise to such notice affect only one Type of Borrowings, then the other Type of Borrowings shall be permitted. 

  
 39 








 SECTION 2.14. Increased Costs. 

(a) If any Change in Law shall: 

(i) impose, modify or deem applicable any reserve, special deposit or similar requirement against assets of,
deposits with or for the account of, or credit extended by, any Lender (except any such reserve requirement reflected in the Adjusted LIBO Rate) or any Issuing Bank; or 

(ii) impose on any Lender or any Issuing Bank or the London interbank market any other condition affecting
this Agreement or Eurodollar Loans made by such Lender or any Letter of Credit or participation therein; or 

(iii) subject any Recipient to any Taxes on its loans, loan principal, letters of credit, commitments, or
other obligations, or its deposits, reserves, other liabilities or capital attributable thereto (other than (A) Indemnified Taxes and (B) Other Connection Taxes on gross or net income, profits or revenue (including value-added or similar
Taxes)); 
 and the result of any of the foregoing shall be to increase the cost to such Lender or such other Recipient of making or
maintaining any Eurodollar Loan (or of maintaining its obligation to make any such Loan) or to increase the cost to such Lender, such Issuing Bank or such other Recipient of participating in, issuing or maintaining any Letter of Credit or to reduce
the amount of any sum received or receivable by such Lender, such Issuing Bank or such other Recipient hereunder (whether of principal, interest or otherwise), then the Borrower will pay to such Lender, such Issuing Bank or such other Recipient, as
the case may be, such additional amount or amounts as will compensate such Lender, such Issuing Bank or such other Recipient, as the case may be, for such additional costs incurred or reduction suffered. 

(b) If any Lender or any Issuing Bank determines that any Change in Law regarding capital or liquidity requirements has or
would have the effect of reducing the rate of return on such Lender’s or such Issuing Bank’s capital or liquidity or on the capital or liquidity of such Lender’s or such Issuing Bank’s holding company, if any, as a consequence of
this Agreement or the Loans made by, or participations in Letters of Credit held by, such Lender, or the Letters of Credit issued by such Issuing Bank, to a level below that which such Lender or such Issuing Bank or such Lender’s or such
Issuing Bank’s holding company could have achieved but for such Change in Law (taking into consideration such Lender’s or such Issuing Bank’s policies and the policies of such Lender’s or such Issuing Bank’s holding company
with respect to capital or liquidity adequacy), then from time to time the Borrower will pay to such Lender or such Issuing Bank, as the case may be, such additional amount or amounts as will compensate such Lender or such Issuing Bank or such
Lender’s or such Issuing Bank’s holding company for any such reduction suffered. 
 (c) A certificate of a Lender
or an Issuing Bank setting forth the amount or amounts necessary to compensate such Lender or such Issuing Bank or its holding company, as the case may be, as specified in Section 2.14(a) or (b) shall be delivered to the Borrower and shall
be conclusive absent manifest error. The Borrower shall pay such Lender or such Issuing Bank, as the case may be, the amount shown as due on any such certificate within 10 days after receipt thereof. 

(d) Failure or delay on the part of any Lender or any Issuing Bank to demand compensation pursuant to this Section shall not
constitute a waiver of such Lender’s or such Issuing Bank’s right to demand such compensation; provided that the Borrower shall not be required to compensate a Lender or an Issuing Bank pursuant to this Section for any increased
costs or reductions incurred more than 270 days prior to the date that such Lender or such Issuing Bank, as the case may be, 

  
 40 








 
notifies the Borrower of the Change in Law giving rise to such increased costs or reductions and of such Lender’s or such Issuing Bank’s intention to claim compensation therefor;
provided further that, if the Change in Law giving rise to such increased costs or reductions is retroactive, then the 270-day period referred to above shall be extended to include the period of retroactive effect thereof. 

SECTION 2.15. Break Funding Payments. 

In the event of (a) the payment of any principal of any Eurodollar Loan other than on the last day of an Interest Period
applicable thereto (including as a result of an Event of Default), (b) the conversion of any Eurodollar Loan other than on the last day of the Interest Period applicable thereto, (c) the failure to borrow, convert, continue or prepay any
Eurodollar Loan on the date specified in any notice delivered pursuant hereto (regardless of whether such notice may be revoked under Section 2.10(b) and is revoked in accordance therewith) or (d) the assignment of any Eurodollar Loan
other than on the last day of the Interest Period applicable thereto as a result of a request by the Borrower pursuant to Section 2.18, then, in any such event, the Borrower shall compensate each Lender for the loss, cost and expense
attributable to such event. In the case of a Eurodollar Loan, such loss, cost or expense to any Lender shall be deemed to include an amount determined by such Lender to be the excess, if any, of (i) the amount of interest which would have
accrued on the principal amount of such Loan had such event not occurred, at the Adjusted LIBO Rate that would have been applicable to such Loan, for the period from the date of such event to the last day of the then current Interest Period therefor
(or, in the case of a failure to borrow, convert or continue, for the period that would have been the Interest Period for such Loan), over (ii) the amount of interest which would accrue on such principal amount for such period at the interest
rate which such Lender would bid were it to bid, at the commencement of such period, for U.S. Dollar deposits of a comparable amount and period from other banks in the eurodollar market. A certificate of any Lender setting forth any amount or
amounts that such Lender is entitled to receive pursuant to this Section shall be delivered to the Borrower and shall be conclusive absent manifest error. The Borrower shall pay such Lender the amount shown as due on any such certificate within 10
days after receipt thereof. 
 SECTION 2.16. Withholding of Taxes; Gross-Up. 

(a) Each payment by any Loan Party under any Loan Document shall be made without withholding for any Taxes, unless such
withholding is required by any law. If any Withholding Agent determines, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, that it is so required to withhold Taxes, then such Withholding Agent may so withhold and shall timely pay the full amount of
withheld Taxes to the relevant Governmental Authority in accordance with applicable law. If such Taxes are Indemnified Taxes, then the amount payable by such Loan Party shall be increased as necessary so that, net of such withholding (including such
withholding applicable to additional amounts payable under this Section), the applicable Recipient receives the amount it would have received had no such withholding been made. 

(b) Payment of Other Taxes by the Borrower. The Borrower shall timely pay any Other Taxes to the relevant Governmental
Authority in accordance with applicable law. 
 (c) Evidence of Payments. As soon as practicable after any payment of
Indemnified Taxes by any Loan Party to a Governmental Authority, such Loan Party shall deliver to the Administrative Agent the original or a certified copy of a receipt issued by such Governmental Authority evidencing such payment, a copy of the
return reporting such payment or other evidence of such payment reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent. 
 (d)
Indemnification by the Borrower. The Loan Parties shall jointly and severally indemnify each Recipient for any Indemnified Taxes that are paid or payable by such Recipient in connection with any Loan Document (including amounts paid or
payable under this Section 2.16(d)) and 

  
 41 








 
any reasonable expenses arising therefrom or with respect thereto, whether or not such Indemnified Taxes were correctly or legally imposed or asserted by the relevant Governmental Authority. The
indemnity under this Section 2.16(d) shall be paid within 10 days after the Recipient delivers to any Loan Party a certificate stating the amount of any Indemnified Taxes so paid or payable by such Recipient and describing in reasonable detail
the basis for the indemnification claim. Such certificate shall be conclusive of the amount so paid or payable absent manifest error. Such Recipient shall deliver a copy of such certificate to the Administrative Agent. 

(e) Indemnification by the Lenders. Each Lender shall severally indemnify the Administrative Agent for any Taxes (but,
in the case of any Indemnified Taxes, only to the extent that any Loan Party has not already indemnified the Administrative Agent for such Indemnified Taxes and without limiting the obligation of the Loan Parties to do so) attributable to such
Lender that are paid or payable by the Administrative Agent in connection with any Loan Document and any reasonable expenses arising therefrom or with respect thereto, whether or not such Taxes were correctly or legally imposed or asserted by the
relevant Governmental Authority. The indemnity under this Section 2.16(e) shall be paid within 10 days after the Administrative Agent delivers to the applicable Lender a certificate stating the amount of Taxes so paid or payable by the
Administrative Agent. Such certificate shall be conclusive of the amount so paid or payable absent manifest error. 
 (f)
Status of Lenders. (i) Any Lender that is entitled to an exemption from, or reduction of, any applicable withholding Tax with respect to any payments under any Loan Document shall deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent, at
the time or times reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent, such properly completed and executed documentation required by law as will permit such payments to be made without, or at a reduced rate of, withholding. In
addition, any Lender, if requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent, shall deliver such other documentation prescribed by law or reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent as will enable the Borrower or the
Administrative Agent to determine whether or not such Lender is subject to any withholding (including backup withholding) or information reporting requirements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the preceding two sentences, the completion,
execution and submission of any documentation described in Section 2.16(f)(iii) shall not be required if in the Lender’s judgment such completion, execution or submission would subject such Lender to any material unreimbursed cost or
expense or would materially prejudice the legal or commercial position of such Lender. Upon the reasonable request of the Borrower or the Administrative Agent, any Lender shall update any form or certification previously delivered pursuant to this
Section 2.16(f). If any form or certification previously delivered pursuant to this Section 2.16 expires or becomes obsolete or inaccurate in any respect with respect to a Lender, such Lender shall promptly (and in any event within 10 days
after such expiration, obsolescence or inaccuracy) notify the Borrower and the Administrative Agent in writing of such expiration, obsolescence or inaccuracy and update the form or certification if it is legally eligible to do so. 

(ii) Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, any Lender with respect to the Borrower shall, if it is
legally eligible to do so, deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent except, in the case of Section 2.16(f)(ii)(E) below with respect to a participating Lender, only to the relevant Lender (in such number of copies reasonably
requested by the Borrower and the Administrative Agent) on or prior to the date on which such Lender becomes a party hereto, duly completed and executed copies of whichever of the following is applicable: 

(A) in the case of a Lender that is a U.S. Person, IRS Form W-9 certifying that such Lender is
exempt from U.S. Federal backup withholding tax; 

  
 42 








 (B) in the case of a Non-U.S. Lender claiming the benefits
of an income tax treaty to which the United States is a party (1) with respect to payments of interest under any Loan Document, IRS Form W-8BEN establishing an exemption from, or reduction of, U.S. Federal withholding Tax
pursuant to the “interest” article of such tax treaty and (2) with respect to any other applicable payments under this Agreement, IRS Form W-8BEN establishing an exemption from, or reduction of, U.S. Federal withholding Tax
pursuant to the “business profits” or “other income” article of such tax treaty; 
 (C)
in the case of a Non-U.S. Lender for whom payments under this Agreement constitute income that is effectively connected with such Lender’s conduct of a trade or business in the United States, IRS Form W-8ECI; 

(D) in the case of a Non-U.S. Lender claiming the benefits of the exemption for “portfolio
interest” under Section 881(c) of the Code both (1) IRS Form W-8BEN and (2) a certificate substantially in the form of Exhibit C (a “U.S. Tax Certificate”) certifying that such Lender is not (a) a
“bank” within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Code, (b) a “10-percent shareholder” of the Borrower within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(B) of the Code and (c) a “controlled foreign
corporation” described in Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the Code; or 
 (E) in the case of a
Non-U.S. Lender that is not the beneficial owner of payments made under this Agreement (including a partnership or a participating Lender) (1) an IRS Form W-8IMY on behalf of itself and (2) the relevant forms prescribed in
clauses (A), (B), (C), (D) and (F) of this Section 2.16(f)(ii) that would be required of each such beneficial owner or partner of such partnership if such beneficial owner or partner were a Lender; provided,
however, that if the Lender is a partnership and one or more of its partners are claiming the exemption for portfolio interest under Section 881(c) of the Code, such Lender may provide a U.S. Tax Certificate on behalf of such
partners. 
 (iii) If a payment made to a Lender under any Loan Document would be subject to
U.S. Federal withholding Tax imposed by FATCA if such Lender were to fail to comply with the applicable reporting requirements of FATCA, such Lender shall deliver to the Withholding Agent, at the time or times prescribed by law such
documentation prescribed by applicable law. Solely for purposes of this Section 2.16(f)(iii), “FATCA” shall include any amendments made to FATCA after the date of this Agreement. 

(g) Treatment of Certain Refunds. If any Recipient determines, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, that it
has received a refund of any Taxes as to which it has been indemnified pursuant to this Section 2.16 (including additional amounts paid pursuant to this Section 2.16), it shall pay to the indemnifying party an amount equal to such refund
(but only to the extent of indemnity payments made under this Section with respect to the Taxes giving rise to such refund), net of all out-of-pocket expenses (including any Taxes) of such indemnified party and without interest (other than any
interest paid by the relevant Governmental Authority with respect to such refund). Such indemnifying party, upon the request of such indemnified party, shall repay to such indemnified party the amount paid to such indemnified party pursuant to the
previous sentence (plus any penalties, interest or other charges imposed by the relevant Governmental Authority) in the event such indemnified party is required to repay such refund to such Governmental Authority. Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in this Section 2.16(g), in no event will any indemnified party be required to pay any amount to any indemnifying party pursuant to this Section 2.16(g) if such payment would place such indemnified party in a less favorable
position 

  
 43 








 
(on a net after-Tax basis) than such indemnified party would have been in if the indemnification payments or additional amounts giving rise to such refund had never been paid and no indemnified
party shall be required to pay any amounts pursuant to this Section 2.16(g) at any time when a Default exists. This Section 2.16(g) shall not be construed to require any indemnified party to make available its Tax returns (or any other
information relating to its Taxes which it deems confidential) to the indemnifying party or any other Person. 
 (h)
Survival. Each party’s obligations under this Section 2.16 shall survive any assignment of rights by, or the replacement of, a Lender, the termination of the Commitments and the repayment, satisfaction or discharge of all other
obligations under any Loan Document. 
 SECTION 2.17. Payments Generally; Pro Rata Treatment; Sharing of Set-offs.

 (a) The Borrower shall make each payment required to be made by it hereunder (whether of principal, interest, fees or
reimbursement of LC Disbursements, or of amounts payable under Section 2.14, 2.15 or 2.16, or otherwise) prior to 12:00 noon, New York City time, on the date when due, in immediately available funds, without
set-off or counterclaim. Any amounts received after such time on any date may, in the discretion of the Administrative Agent, be deemed to have been received on the next succeeding Business Day for purposes of
calculating interest thereon. All such payments shall be made to the Administrative Agent at its offices at 270 Park Avenue, New York, New York, except payments to be made directly to an Issuing Bank or a Swingline Lender as expressly provided
herein and except that payments pursuant to Sections 2.14, 2.15, 2.16 and 9.03 shall be made directly to the Persons entitled thereto. The Administrative Agent shall distribute any such payments received by it for the account of any other Person to
the appropriate recipient promptly following receipt thereof. If any payment hereunder shall be due on a day that is not a Business Day, the date for payment shall be extended to the next succeeding Business Day, and, in the case of any payment
accruing interest, interest thereon shall be payable for the period of such extension. All payments hereunder shall be made in U.S. Dollars. 

(b) If at any time insufficient funds are received by and available to the Administrative Agent to pay fully all amounts of
principal, unreimbursed LC Disbursements, interest and fees then due hereunder, such funds shall be applied (i) first, towards payment of interest and fees then due hereunder, ratably among the parties entitled thereto in accordance with
the amounts of interest and fees then due to such parties, and (ii) second, towards payment of principal and unreimbursed LC Disbursements then due hereunder, ratably among the parties entitled thereto in accordance with the amounts of
principal and unreimbursed LC Disbursements (for this purpose, taking the Dollar Equivalent of any LC Disbursement made in an Approved Alternate Currency) then due to such parties. 

(c) If any Lender shall, by exercising any right of set-off or counterclaim or
otherwise, obtain payment in respect of any principal of or interest on any of its Revolving Loans or participations in LC Disbursements or Swingline Loans resulting in such Lender receiving payment of a greater proportion of the aggregate amount of
its Revolving Loans and participations in LC Disbursements and Swingline Loans and accrued interest thereon than the proportion received by any other Lender, then the Lender receiving such greater proportion shall purchase (in U.S. Dollars) (for
cash at face value) participations in the Revolving Loans and participations in LC Disbursements (for purposes of any participation in an LC Disbursement under a Letter of Credit denominated in an Approved Alternate Currency, taking the Dollar
Equivalent of such LC Disbursement) and Swingline Loans of other Lenders to the extent necessary so that the benefit of all such payments shall be shared by the Lenders ratably in accordance with the aggregate amount of principal of and accrued
interest on their respective Revolving Loans and participations in LC Disbursements (for purposes of any participation in an LC Disbursement made under a Letter of Credit denominated in an Approved Alternate Currency, taking the Dollar Equivalent of
such LC Disbursement) and Swingline Loans; provided that (i) if any such 

  
 44 








 
participations are purchased and all or any portion of the payment giving rise thereto is recovered, such participations shall be rescinded and the purchase price restored to the extent of such
recovery, without interest, and (ii) the provisions of this Section 2.17(c) shall not be construed to apply to any payment made by the Borrower pursuant to and in accordance with the express terms of this Agreement (including non-pro rata
payments expressly contemplated by Sections 2.10(b) and 2.09(a) (in connection with the earlier Maturity Date of a given Lender) or any payment obtained by a Lender as consideration for the assignment of or sale of a participation in any of its
Loans or participations in LC Disbursements to any assignee or participant, other than to the Borrower or any Subsidiary or Affiliate thereof (as to which the provisions of this Section 2.17(c) shall apply)). The Borrower consents to the
foregoing and agrees, to the extent it may effectively do so under applicable law, that any Lender acquiring a participation pursuant to the foregoing arrangements may exercise against the Borrower rights of set-off and counterclaim with respect to
such participation as fully as if such Lender were a direct creditor of the Borrower in the amount of such participation. 

(d) Unless the Administrative Agent shall have received notice from the Borrower prior to the date on which any payment is due
to the Administrative Agent for the account of the Lenders or the Issuing Banks hereunder that the Borrower will not make such payment, the Administrative Agent may assume that the Borrower has made such payment on such date in accordance herewith
and may, in reliance upon such assumption, distribute to the Lenders or the applicable Issuing Bank, as the case may be, the amount due. In such event, if the Borrower has not in fact made such payment, then each of the Lenders or the applicable
Issuing Bank, as the case may be, severally agrees to repay to the Administrative Agent forthwith on demand the amount so distributed to such Lender or Issuing Bank with interest thereon, for each day from and including the date such amount is
distributed to it to but excluding the date of payment to the Administrative Agent, at the greater of the Federal Funds Effective Rate and a rate determined by the Administrative Agent in accordance with banking industry rules on interbank
compensation. 
 (e) If any Lender shall fail to make any payment required to be made by it pursuant to
Section 2.04(c), 2.05(e) or (f), 2.06(b), 2.17(d) or 9.03(d), then the Administrative Agent may, in its discretion and notwithstanding any contrary provision hereof, (i) apply any amounts thereafter received by the Administrative Agent for
the account of such Lender and for the benefit of the Administrative Agent, each Swingline Lender or each Issuing Bank to satisfy such Lender’s obligations under such Sections until all such unsatisfied obligations are fully paid, and/or
(ii) hold any such amounts in a segregated account as cash collateral for, and application to, any future funding obligations of such Lender under such Sections. In the case of each of (i) and (ii) above, in any order as determined by
the Administrative Agent in its discretion. 
 SECTION 2.18. Mitigation Obligations; Replacement of Lenders. 

(a) If any Lender requests compensation under Section 2.14, or if the Borrower is required to pay any additional
amount to any Lender or any Governmental Authority for the account of any Lender pursuant to Section 2.16, then such Lender shall use reasonable efforts to designate a different lending office for funding or booking its Loans hereunder or to
assign its rights and obligations hereunder to another of its offices, branches or affiliates, if, in the judgment of such Lender, such designation or assignment (i) would eliminate or reduce amounts payable pursuant to Section 2.14 or
2.16, as the case may be, in the future and (ii) would not subject such Lender to any unreimbursed cost or expense and would not otherwise be disadvantageous to such Lender. The Borrower hereby agrees to pay all reasonable costs and expenses
incurred by any Lender in connection with any such designation or assignment. 

  
 45 








 (b) If (w) any Lender becomes a Non-Continuing Lender at any time after the
applicable Extension Response Date occurring after the Effective Date, (x) any Lender requests compensation under Section 2.14, (y) the Borrower is required to pay any additional amount to any Lender or any Governmental Authority for
the account of any Lender pursuant to Section 2.16, or (z) any Lender becomes a Defaulting Lender, then the Borrower may, at its sole expense and effort, upon notice to such Lender and the Administrative Agent, require such Lender to
assign and delegate, without recourse (in accordance with and subject to the restrictions contained in Section 9.04), all its interests, rights and obligations under this Agreement to an assignee that shall assume such obligations (which
assignee may be another Lender, if a Lender accepts such assignment); provided that (i) the Borrower shall have received the prior written consent of the Administrative Agent and each Issuing Bank, which consent shall not unreasonably be
withheld or delayed, (ii) such Lender shall have received payment (in U.S. Dollars) of an amount equal to the outstanding principal of its Loans and participations in LC Disbursements (for purposes of any participation in an LC Disbursement
made under a Letter of Credit denominated in an Approved Alternate Currency, taking the Dollar Equivalent of such LC Disbursement) and Swingline Loans, accrued interest thereon, accrued fees and all other amounts payable to it hereunder, from the
assignee (to the extent of such outstanding principal and accrued interest and fees) or the Borrower (in the case of all other amounts), (iii) in the case of any such assignment resulting from a claim for compensation under Section 2.14 or
payments required to be made pursuant to Section 2.16, such assignment will result in a reduction in such compensation or payments and (iv) in the case of the replacement of any Lender that is a Non-Continuing Lender as contemplated by
clause (w) above, the Maturity Date applicable to the assignee’s Commitment shall be the Final Maturity Date then in effect. A Lender shall not be required to make any such assignment and delegation if, prior thereto, as a result of a
waiver by such Lender or otherwise, the circumstances entitling the Borrower to require such assignment and delegation cease to apply. 

SECTION 2.19. Defaulting Lenders. 

Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, if any Lender becomes a Defaulting Lender, then the following
provisions shall apply for so long as such Lender is a Defaulting Lender: 
 (a) fees shall cease to accrue on the unfunded
portion of the Commitment of such Defaulting Lender pursuant to Section 2.11; 
 (b) the Commitment and Revolving
Credit Exposure of such Defaulting Lender shall not be included in determining whether all Lenders or the Required Lenders have taken or may take any action hereunder (including any consent to any amendment or waiver pursuant to Section 9.02),
provided that any waiver, amendment or modification requiring the consent of all Lenders or each affected Lender shall require the consent of such Defaulting Lender; 

(c) if any Swingline Exposure or LC Exposure exists at the time a Lender becomes a Defaulting Lender then: 

(i) all or any part of such Swingline Exposure and LC Exposure shall be reallocated among the non-Defaulting
Lenders in accordance with their respective Applicable Percentages but only to the extent (x) the sum of all non-Defaulting Lenders’ Revolving Credit Exposures plus such Defaulting Lender’s Swingline Exposure and LC Exposure does not
exceed the total of all non-Defaulting Lenders’ Commitments and (y) the conditions set forth in Section 4.02 are satisfied at such time; and 

  
 46 








 (ii) if the reallocation described in clause (i) above
cannot, or can only partially, be effected, the Borrower shall within one (1) Business Day following notice by the Administrative Agent (x) first, prepay such Swingline Exposure and (y) second, cash collateralize such
Defaulting Lender’s LC Exposure (after giving effect to any partial reallocation pursuant to clause (i) above) in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 2.05(k) for so long as such LC Exposure is outstanding; 

(iii) if the Borrower cash collateralizes any portion of such Defaulting Lender’s LC Exposure pursuant to
this Section 2.19(c), the Borrower shall not be required to pay any fees to such Defaulting Lender pursuant to Section 2.11(b) with respect to such Defaulting Lender’s LC Exposure during the period such Defaulting Lender’s LC
Exposure is cash collateralized; 
 (iv) if the LC Exposure of the non-Defaulting Lenders is reallocated
pursuant to this Section 2.19(c), then the fees payable to the Lenders pursuant to Section 2.11(b) shall be adjusted in accordance with such non-Defaulting Lenders’ Applicable Percentages; or 

(v) if any Defaulting Lender’s LC Exposure is neither cash collateralized nor reallocated pursuant to
this Section 2.19(c), then, without prejudice to any rights or remedies of any Issuing Bank or any Lender hereunder, all Facility Fees that otherwise would have been payable to such Defaulting Lender (solely with respect to the portion of such
Defaulting Lender’s Commitment that was utilized by such LC Exposure) and letter of credit fees payable under Section 2.11(b) with respect to such Defaulting Lender’s LC Exposure shall be payable to the applicable Issuing Bank until
such LC Exposure is cash collateralized and/or reallocated; and 
 (d) so long as any Lender is a Defaulting Lender, no
Swingline Lender shall be required to fund any Swingline Loan and no Issuing Bank shall be required to issue, amend, renew or increase any Letter of Credit, unless it is satisfied that the related exposure will be 100% covered by the Commitments of
the non-Defaulting Lenders and/or cash collateral will be provided by the Borrower in accordance with Section 2.19(c), and participating interests in any such newly issued or increased Letter of Credit or newly made Swingline Loan shall be
allocated among non-Defaulting Lenders in a manner consistent with Section 2.19(c)(i) (and Defaulting Lenders shall not participate therein). 

In the event that the Administrative Agent, the Borrower, each Issuing Bank and each Swingline Lender each agrees that a Defaulting Lender has
adequately remedied all matters that caused such Lender to be a Defaulting Lender, then the Swingline Exposure and LC Exposure of the Lenders shall be readjusted to reflect the inclusion of such Lender’s Commitment and on such date such Lender
shall purchase at par such of the Loans of the other Lenders (other than Swingline Loans) as the Administrative Agent shall determine may be necessary in order for such Lender to hold such Loans in accordance with its Applicable Percentage. 

SECTION 2.20. Incremental Commitments. 

(a) The Borrower may at any time or from time to time after the Effective Date, by notice to the Administrative Agent, request
one or more increases in the amount of the Commitments (each such increase, a “Commitment Increase”), provided that (i) both at the time of any such request and upon the effectiveness of any Incremental Amendment
referred to below, (x) no Default shall exist and (y) all representations and warranties in this Agreement or any other Loan Document shall be true and correct in all material respects and (ii) the aggregate amount of all Commitment
Increases pursuant to this Section 2.20 shall not exceed $250,000,000. Each Commitment Increase shall be in an aggregate principal amount that is not less than $20,000,000 (provided that such amount may be less than


  
 47 








 
$20,000,000 if such amount represents all remaining availability under the limit set forth in the next sentence). Each notice from the Borrower pursuant to this Section 2.20 shall set forth
the requested amount of the relevant Commitment Increase. Commitment Increases may be provided, by any existing Lender or by any other bank or other financial institution (any such other bank or other financial institution being called an
“Additional Lender”), provided that the Administrative Agent shall have consented (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed) to such Lender’s or Additional Lender’s providing such Commitment Increases
if such consent would be required under Section 9.04 for an assignment of Revolving Loans or Commitments, as applicable, to such Lender or Additional Lender. Commitments in respect of Commitment Increases shall become Commitments (or in the
case of a Commitment Increase to be provided by an existing Lender, an increase in such Lender’s Commitment) under this Agreement pursuant to an amendment (an “Incremental Amendment”) to this Agreement, executed by the
Borrower, each Lender agreeing to provide such Commitment Increase, if any, each Additional Lender, if any, and the Administrative Agent. The Incremental Amendment may, without the consent of any other Lenders, effect such amendments to this
Agreement as may be necessary or appropriate, in the reasonable opinion of the Administrative Agent and the Borrower, to effect the provisions of this Section 2.20. The effectiveness of any Incremental Amendment shall be subject to the
satisfaction on the date thereof of each of the conditions set forth in Section 4.02 (it being understood that all references to “the occasion of any Borrowing” or “issuance, amendment, renewal or extension of a Letter of
Credit” or similar language in such Section 4.02 shall be deemed to refer to the effective date of such Incremental Amendment) and such other conditions as the parties thereto shall agree. The Borrower will use the proceeds of the
Commitment Increases for any purpose not prohibited by this Agreement. No Lender shall be obligated to provide any Commitment Increases, unless it so agrees. Upon each increase in the Commitments pursuant to this Section 2.20, (a) each
Lender immediately prior to such increase will automatically and without further act be deemed to have assigned to each Lender providing a portion of the Commitment Increase (each, a “Commitment Increase Lender”) in respect of such
increase, and each such Commitment Increase Lender will automatically and without further act be deemed to have assumed, a portion of such Lender’s participations hereunder in outstanding Letters of Credit and Swingline Loans such that, after
giving effect to each such deemed assignment and assumption of participations, the percentage of the aggregate outstanding (i) participations hereunder in Letters of Credit and (ii) participations hereunder in Swingline Loans held by each
Lender (including each such Commitment Increase Lender) will equal the percentage of the Total Commitment represented by such Lender’s Commitment and (b) if, on the date of such increase, there are any Revolving Loans outstanding, such
Revolving Loans shall on or prior to the effectiveness of such Commitment Increase be prepaid from the proceeds of additional Revolving Loans made hereunder (reflecting such increase in Commitments), which prepayment shall be accompanied by accrued
interest on the Revolving Loans being prepaid and any costs incurred by any Lender in accordance with Section 2.15. The Administrative Agent and the Lenders hereby agree that the minimum borrowing, pro rata borrowing and pro rata
payment requirements contained elsewhere in this Agreement shall not apply to the transactions effected pursuant to the immediately preceding sentence. 

(b) This Section 2.20 shall supersede any provisions in Section 2.17 or 9.02 to the contrary. 

SECTION 2.21. Maturity Date Extensions. 

Prior to (but not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to) the applicable Extension Date, the Borrower may make a
written request to the Administrative Agent, who shall forward a copy of each such request to each of the Continuing Lenders, that the Final Maturity Date then in effect be extended to the date occurring twelve (12) months after such existing
Final Maturity Date. Such request shall be accompanied by a certificate of a Financial Officer of the Borrower stating that no Default has occurred and is continuing. If, by the date (each, an “Extension Response Date”) which is 30


  
 48 








 
days prior to the applicable Extension Date, Continuing Lenders which are not Defaulting Lenders holding at least a majority of the Commitments held by Continuing Lenders which are not Defaulting
Lenders agree thereto in writing, the Final Maturity Date, and the Maturity Date of each Continuing Lender then consenting, shall be automatically extended to the date occurring twelve (12) months after the then existing Final Maturity Date. In
the event that the Borrower has not obtained the requisite percentage of Continuing Lenders to permit an extension by the relevant Extension Response Date, the Borrower may extend the deadline for obtaining such percentage to the 30th day following
such Extension Response Date in order to take such actions with respect to any Lender that is a Non-Continuing Lender after giving effect to such Extension Response Date in order to obtain the requisite percentage of Lenders constituting Continuing
Lenders to permit such extension (including actions contemplated by Section 2.18). The Administrative Agent shall notify the Borrower and each Lender of the effectiveness of any such extension. No Lender shall be obligated to grant any
extensions pursuant to this Section 2.21, and any such extension shall be in the sole discretion of each of them. A Lender’s Maturity Date shall not be so extended pursuant to this Section 2.21 for (x) any Lender that is a
Non-Continuing Lender at the time such request for extension is made and (y) any Continuing Lender at the time of such request that has not consented in writing, within the time specified above, to any such request for the extension thereof. It
is understood and agreed that the Borrower shall have a total of two (2) opportunities to request an extension pursuant to this Section 2.21 and that each of such extension (if validly effected pursuant to this Section 2.21) shall
extend the Final Maturity Date then in effect by twelve (12) months. 
 ARTICLE III 

Representations and Warranties 

The Borrower represents and warrants to the Lenders that: 

SECTION 3.01. Organization; Powers. 

Each Loan Party and its Material Subsidiaries is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the
jurisdiction of its organization, has all requisite power and authority to carry on its business as now conducted and, except where the failure to do so, individually or in the aggregate, could not reasonably be expected to result in a Material
Adverse Effect, is qualified to do business in, and is in good standing in, every jurisdiction where such qualification is required. 

SECTION 3.02. Authorization; Enforceability. 

The Transactions are within each Loan Party’s corporate powers and have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate
and, if required, shareholder action. Each Loan Document has been duly executed and delivered by each Loan Party party thereto, and constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of each Loan Party, enforceable in accordance with its terms,
subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and subject to general principles of equity, regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or at law. 

SECTION 3.03. Governmental Approvals; No Conflicts. 

The Transactions (a) do not require any consent or approval of, registration or filing with, or any other action by, any
Governmental Authority, except such as have been obtained or made and are in full force and effect, (b) will not violate any material applicable law or regulation or the charter, by-laws or other organizational documents of any Loan Party or
any order of any Governmental Authority, (c) will not violate or result in a default under any indenture or other material agreement or instrument binding upon the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries or its assets, or give rise to a right
thereunder to require any payment to be made by the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, and (d) will not result in the creation or imposition of any Lien on any asset of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries. 

  
 49 








 SECTION 3.04. Financial Condition; No Material Adverse Effect. 

(a) The Borrower has heretofore furnished to the Lenders its consolidated balance sheet and statements of income,
shareholders’ equity and cash flows (i) as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, reported on by KPMG LLP, independent public accountants, and (ii) as of and for the fiscal quarter and the portion of the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2013 certified by its chief financial officer. Such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations and cash flows of the Borrower and its consolidated Subsidiaries
as of such dates and for such periods in accordance with GAAP, subject to year-end audit adjustments and the absence of footnotes in the case of the statements referred to in clause (ii) above. 

(b) Since December 31, 2012, there has been no event, occurrence or development that, individually or in the aggregate,
has had a Material Adverse Effect. 
 SECTION 3.05. Properties. 

(a) Each Loan Party and its Material Subsidiaries has good title to, or valid leasehold interests in, all its real and
personal property material to its business, except for minor defects in title that do not interfere in any material respect with its ability to conduct its business as currently conducted or to utilize such properties for their intended purposes.

 (b) Each of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries owns, or is licensed to use, all trademarks, tradenames, copyrights,
patents and other intellectual property material to its business, and the use thereof by the Borrower and its Subsidiaries does not infringe upon the rights of any other Person, except for any such infringements that, individually or in the
aggregate, could not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect. 
 SECTION 3.06. Litigation and
Environmental Matters. 
 (a) There are no actions, suits or proceedings by or before any arbitrator or Governmental
Authority pending against or, to the knowledge of the Borrower, threatened against or affecting the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries (i) that could reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to result in a Material Adverse
Effect (other than the Disclosed Matters) or (ii) that involve this Agreement, the other Loan Documents or the Transactions. 

(b) Except with respect to any other matters that, individually or in the aggregate, could not reasonably be expected to
result in a Material Adverse Effect, neither the Borrower nor any of its Subsidiaries (i) has failed to comply with any Environmental Law or to obtain, maintain or comply with any permit, license or other approval required under any
Environmental Law, (ii) has become subject to any Environmental Liability, (iii) has received notice of any claim with respect to any Environmental Liability or (iv) knows of any basis for any Environmental Liability. 

(c) Since the Effective Date, there has been no change in the status of the Disclosed Matters that, individually or in the
aggregate, has had a Material Adverse Effect. 

  
 50 








 SECTION 3.07. Compliance with Laws and Contractual Obligations. 

Each of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries is in compliance with all laws, regulations and orders of any Governmental Authority
applicable to it or its property and all Contractual Obligations binding upon it or its property, except where the failure to do so, individually or in the aggregate, could not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect. No
Default has occurred and is continuing. 
 SECTION 3.08. Use of Proceeds; Margin Regulations; Investment Company
Status. 
 (a) All proceeds of the Loans and Letters of Credit shall be utilized for the general corporate and working
capital purposes of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries (including, without limitation, (i) to support Permitted Obligations, (ii) to replace Existing Letters of Credit, (iii) to effect Permitted Litigation Bonding, (iv) to pay,
satisfy and/or otherwise discharge judgments rendered against the Borrower or any other Subsidiary from time to time, (v) to refinance, repay or retire Indebtedness, (vi) to make payments under the Master Settlement Agreement and under any
other settlement agreement in respect of tobacco litigation that the Borrower and/or any of its Subsidiaries is now or hereafter party to or bound by, (vii) to pay dividends on and to repurchase common stock of the Borrower, to the extent
permitted by Section 6.05; provided that, in the case of any repurchase by the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries of Equity Interests of the Borrower made with all or any portion of the proceeds of any Loan, all of such Equity Interests
so repurchased are immediately cancelled, (viii) to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Transactions and (ix) to effect acquisitions to the extent permitted by this Agreement). 

(b) Neither the making of any Loan hereunder or issuance of any Letter of Credit, nor the use of the proceeds thereof, will
violate or be inconsistent with the provisions of regulations of the Board, including Regulations T, U and X, and no part of the proceeds of any Loan or any Letter of Credit will be used to purchase or carry any Margin Stock or to extend credit
for the purpose of purchasing or carrying any Margin Stock in violation of Regulations T, U or X. Not more than 25.0% of the value of the assets of the Borrower and their respective Subsidiaries is represented by Margin Stock. 

(c) Neither of the Borrower nor any of its Subsidiaries is an “investment company”, or a company
“controlled” by an “investment company”, within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Neither the Borrower nor any of its Subsidiaries is subject to regulation under any Requirement of Law (other than
Regulation X of the Board) that limits its ability to incur Indebtedness. 
 SECTION 3.09. Taxes. 

Each of the Borrower and its Material Subsidiaries has timely filed or caused to be filed all material Tax returns and reports
required to have been filed (after giving effect to all valid filing extensions) and has paid or caused to be paid all material Taxes required to have been paid by it, except Taxes that are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings
and for which the Borrower or such Subsidiary, as applicable, has set aside on its books adequate reserves. 
 SECTION 3.10.
ERISA. 
 No ERISA Event has occurred or is reasonably expected to occur that, when taken together with all other
such ERISA Events for which liability is reasonably expected to occur, could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect. 

  
 51 








 SECTION 3.11. Disclosure. 

As of the Effective Date, the Borrower has disclosed to the Lenders all material agreements, instruments and corporate or
other restrictions to which it or any of its Subsidiaries is subject. Neither the Information Memorandum nor any of the other reports, financial statements, certificates or other information furnished by or on behalf of the Borrower in writing to
the Administrative Agent or any Lender in connection with the negotiation of this Agreement or delivered hereunder (as modified or supplemented by other information so furnished) (in each case, taken as a whole) contains any material misstatement of
fact or omits to state any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; provided that, with respect to projected financial information, the Borrower
represents only that such information was prepared in good faith based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable at the time, it being recognized by the Administrative Agent and the Lenders that such projected financial information should not be
viewed as facts, and that actual results will differ from such projected financial information and such differences may be material. 

SECTION 3.12. Subsidiaries. 

On and as of the Effective Date, the Borrower has no Subsidiaries other than those Subsidiaries listed on Schedule 3.12.
Schedule 3.12 correctly sets forth, as of the Effective Date, (x) the percentage ownership (direct and indirect) of the Borrower in each class of capital stock or other Equity Interests of each of its Subsidiaries and also identified the direct
owner thereof and (y) the name of each Material Subsidiary, each Subsidiary which is not a Material Subsidiary and each Non-Guarantor Subsidiary. All outstanding shares of Equity Interests of each Subsidiary of the Borrower have been duly and
validly issued, are fully paid and non-assessable and have been issued free of preemptive rights. 
 SECTION 3.13.
Anti-Terrorism Law. 
 (a) Neither the Borrower nor any of its Subsidiaries is in violation of any legal requirement
relating to any laws with respect to terrorism or money laundering (“Anti-Terrorism Laws”), including Executive Order No. 13224 on Terrorist Financing effective September 24, 2001 (the “Executive Order”)
and the PATRIOT Act. None of (i) the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, (ii) to the knowledge of the Borrower, any officer, director or employee of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries or (iii) to the knowledge of the
Borrower, any agent of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries that will act in any capacity in connection with or benefit from the credit facility established hereby, as the case may be, is a Designated Person. 

(b) None of (i) the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, (ii) to the knowledge of the Borrower, any officer,
director or employee of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries or (iii) to the knowledge of the Borrower, any agent of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries that will act in any capacity in connection with or benefit from the credit facility
established hereby, as the case may be, (x) conducts any business or engages in making or receiving any contribution of funds, goods or services to or for the benefit of a Designated Person, (y) deals in, or otherwise engages in any
transaction relating to, any property or interests in property blocked pursuant to the Executive Order, or (z) engages in or conspires to engage in any transaction that violates any of the prohibitions set forth in any Anti-Terrorism Law. 

(c) Neither the making of any Loan hereunder or issuance of any Letter of Credit, nor the use of the proceeds thereof, will
fund any activities or business of or with any Designated Person or in any country or territory that at the time of such funding is the subject of any sanctions under any Anti-Terrorism Laws or any sanctions program administered by OFAC or will
result in a violation by any party to this Agreement of any Anti-Terrorism Laws or any sanctions program administered by OFAC. 

  
 52 








 ARTICLE IV 

Conditions 

SECTION 4.01. Effective Date. 

The obligations of the Lenders to make Loans and of each Issuing Bank to issue Letters of Credit hereunder shall not become
effective until the date on which each of the following conditions is satisfied (or waived in accordance with Section 9.02): 

(a) The Administrative Agent (or its counsel) shall have received from each party hereto either (i) a counterpart of this
Agreement signed on behalf of such party or (ii) written evidence satisfactory to the Administrative Agent (which may include telecopy transmission or electronic transmission in .pdf format of a signed signature page of this Agreement) that
such party has signed a counterpart of this Agreement. 
 (b) The Administrative Agent shall have received written opinions
(each addressed to the Administrative Agent and the Lenders and dated the Effective Date) of (i) Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, counsel for the Borrower, (ii) Betzer, Roybal & Eisenberg P.C., New Mexico counsel for
the Borrower and (iii) the Deputy General Counsel of the Borrower, each in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent and its counsel. 

(c) The Administrative Agent shall have received such documents and certificates as the Administrative Agent or its counsel
may reasonably request relating to the organization, existence and good standing of each Loan Party, the authorization of the Transactions and any other legal matters relating to each Loan Party, this Agreement or the Transactions, all in form and
substance reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent and its counsel. 
 (d) The Administrative Agent shall have
received a certificate, dated the Effective Date and signed by the president, a vice president or a Financial Officer of the Borrower, confirming compliance with the conditions set forth in Sections 4.02(a) and (b). 

(e) The Administrative Agent and each Lender shall have received all fees and other amounts due and payable to the
Administrative Agent and such Lender, respectively, on or prior to the Effective Date, including, to the extent invoiced a reasonable time prior to the Effective Date, reimbursement or payment of all out-of-pocket expenses of the Administrative Agent required to be reimbursed or paid by the Borrower hereunder. 

(f) On or prior to the Effective Date, all material governmental, regulatory and third party approvals necessary to consummate
the financing transactions contemplated by this Agreement and the other Loan Documents and for the continuing operations of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole, shall have been obtained and remain in full force and effect. 

(g) On the Effective Date, (i) no litigation shall be pending or threatened in writing with respect to this Agreement,
any other Loan Document or the Transactions and (ii) except for the Disclosed Matters, since December 31, 2012, no litigation shall be pending or threatened in writing which has had, or could reasonably be expected to result in, a Material
Adverse Effect. 

  
 53 








 (h) No event, development or circumstance shall have occurred since
December 31, 2012 that has had, or could reasonably be expected to result in, a Material Adverse Effect. 
 (i) Each
Material Subsidiary of the Borrower and each other Subsidiary of the Borrower (other than a Subsidiary identified as a Non-Guarantor Subsidiary on Schedule 3.12) shall have duly authorized, executed and delivered a Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement
substantially in the form of Exhibit B hereto, and the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement shall be in full force and effect. 

(j) All loans and other obligations of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries with respect to the Existing Credit Agreement shall
have been paid in full and all commitments, letters of credit and guarantees in connection therewith shall have been terminated and/or released (or, in the case of Existing Letters of Credit, incorporated hereunder as Letters of Credit as
contemplated by Section 2.05(d)), all to the reasonable satisfaction of the Administrative Agent. On the Effective Date (immediately prior to giving effect thereto), no Default or Event of Default under, and as defined in, the Existing Credit
Agreement shall have occurred and be continuing. 
 (k) Each Lender shall have received at least five Business Days before
the Effective Date all documentation and other information requested by such Lender and required by bank regulatory authorities under applicable “know your customer” and anti-money laundering rules and regulations, including, without
limitation, the PATRIOT Act. 
 The Administrative Agent shall notify the Borrower and the Lenders of the Effective Date, and such notice
shall be conclusive and binding. 
 SECTION 4.02. Each Credit Event. 

The obligation of each Lender to make a Loan on the occasion of any Borrowing, and of each Issuing Bank to issue, amend, renew
or extend any Letter of Credit, is subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions: 
 (a) The representations and
warranties made by any Loan Party in or pursuant to the Loan Documents shall be true and correct in all material respects on and as of the date of such Borrowing or the date of issuance, amendment, renewal or extension of such Letter of Credit, as
applicable (except to the extent any such representation or warranty speaks only as of a previous date, in which case it was true and correct in all material respects on and as of such date); provided, that, any representation and warranty
that is qualified as to “materiality,” “Material Adverse Effect” or similar language shall be true and correct in all respects on such respective dates. 

(b) At the time of and immediately after giving effect to such Borrowing or the issuance, amendment, renewal or extension of
such Letter of Credit, as applicable, no Default shall have occurred and be continuing. 
 Each Borrowing and each issuance, amendment,
renewal or extension of a Letter of Credit shall be deemed to constitute a representation and warranty by the Borrower on the date thereof as to the matters specified in Sections 4.02(a) and (b). 

  
 54 








 ARTICLE V 

Affirmative Covenants 

Until the Commitments have expired or been terminated and the principal of and interest on each Loan and all fees payable
hereunder shall have been paid in full and all Letters of Credit shall have expired or terminated (or been cash collateralized or back-stopped on terms satisfactory to each Issuing Bank) and all LC Disbursements shall have been reimbursed, the
Borrower covenants and agrees with the Lenders that: 
 SECTION 5.01. Financial Statements; Ratings Change and Other
Information. 
 The Borrower will furnish to the Administrative Agent and each Lender: 

(a) within 100 days after the end of each fiscal year of the Borrower, its audited consolidated balance sheet and related
statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows as of the end of and for such year, setting forth in each case in comparative form the figures for the previous fiscal year, all reported on by KPMG LLP or other independent public
accountants of recognized national standing (without a “going concern” or like qualification or exception and without any qualification or exception as to the scope of such audit) to the effect that such consolidated financial statements
present fairly in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Borrower and its consolidated Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP consistently applied; 

(b) within 55 days after the end of each of the first three fiscal quarters of each fiscal year of the Borrower, its
consolidated balance sheet and related statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows as of the end of and for such fiscal quarter and the then elapsed portion of the fiscal year, setting forth in each case in comparative form the
figures for the corresponding period or periods of (or, in the case of the balance sheet, as of the end of) the previous fiscal year, all certified by one of its Financial Officers as presenting fairly in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of the Borrower and its consolidated Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP consistently applied, subject to normal year-end audit adjustments and the absence of footnotes; 

(c) concurrently with any delivery of financial statements under clause (a) or (b) above, a compliance certificate
of a Financial Officer of the Borrower in the form of Exhibit D (i) certifying as to whether a Default has occurred and, if a Default has occurred, specifying the details thereof and any action taken or proposed to be taken with respect
thereto, (ii) certifying compliance with Section 6.04 for the applicable period and setting forth reasonably detailed calculations demonstrating such compliance, (iii) stating whether any material change in GAAP or in the application
thereof has occurred since the date of the audited financial statements referred to in Section 3.04 and, if any such change has occurred, specifying the effect of such change on the financial statements accompanying such certificate and
attaching appropriate reconciliation work-sheets, and (iv) in the case of the delivery of financial statements under clause (a) above (and, if requested by the Administrative Agent, under clause (b) above for any fiscal quarter ended
on June 30 of any fiscal year), identifying the legal names of all Material Subsidiaries; 
 (d) concurrently with any
delivery of financial statements under clause (a) above, a certificate of the accounting firm that reported on such financial statements stating whether they obtained knowledge during the course of their examination of such financial statements
of any Default (which certificate may be limited to the extent required by accounting rules or guidelines); 

  
 55 








 (e) promptly after the same become publicly available, copies of all periodic and
other reports, proxy statements and other materials filed by the Borrower or any Subsidiary with the SEC, or any Governmental Authority succeeding to any or all of the functions of the SEC, or distributed by the Borrower or any Subsidiary to its
shareholders generally, as the case may be; 
 (f) promptly after Moody’s or S&P shall have announced a change in
the rating established or deemed to have been established for the Index Debt, written notice of such rating change; and 

(g) promptly following any request therefor, such other information regarding the operations, business affairs and financial
condition of the Borrower or any Subsidiary, or compliance with the terms of this Agreement, as the Administrative Agent or any Lender (through the Administrative Agent) may reasonably request. 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent the Borrower files the information and reports referred to in clause (e) above with the SEC
and such information is publicly available on the Internet, the Borrower shall be deemed to be in compliance with its obligations to furnish such information and reports to the Administrative Agent pursuant to clause (e). 

SECTION 5.02. Notices of Material Events. 

The Borrower will furnish to the Administrative Agent and each Lender prompt written notice of the following (promptly upon a
Responsible Officer obtaining knowledge thereof): 
 (a) the occurrence of any Default; 

(b) the filing or commencement of any action, suit or proceeding by or before any arbitrator or Governmental Authority against
or affecting the Borrower or any Affiliate thereof that could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect; 

(c) the occurrence of any ERISA Event that, alone or together with any other ERISA Events that have occurred, could reasonably
be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect; and 
 (d) any other development that results in, or could reasonably be
expected to result in, a Material Adverse Effect. 
 Each notice delivered under this Section 5.02 shall be accompanied
by a statement of a Financial Officer or other executive officer of the Borrower setting forth the details of the event or development requiring such notice and any action taken or proposed to be taken with respect thereto. 

SECTION 5.03. Existence; Conduct of Business. 

The Borrower will, and will cause each of its Material Subsidiaries to, do or cause to be done all things necessary to
preserve, renew and keep in full force and effect its legal existence and the rights, licenses, permits, privileges and franchises material to the conduct of its business; provided that the foregoing shall not prohibit any merger,
consolidation, liquidation or dissolution permitted under Section 6.03. 

  
 56 








 SECTION 5.04. Payment of Obligations. 

The Borrower will, and will cause each of its Subsidiaries to, pay its material obligations, including material Tax
liabilities, except where (a) the validity or amount thereof is being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings, (b) the Borrower or such Subsidiary has set aside on its books adequate reserves with respect thereto in accordance
with GAAP and (c) the failure to make payment pending such contest could not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect. 

SECTION 5.05. Maintenance of Properties; Insurance. 

The Borrower will, and will cause each of its Material Subsidiaries to, (a) keep and maintain all property material to
the conduct of its business in good working order and condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted, and subject to the occurrence of casualty events, and (b) maintain, with financially sound and reputable insurance companies, insurance in such
amounts and against such risks as are customarily maintained by companies engaged in the same or similar businesses operating in the same or similar locations. 

SECTION 5.06. Books and Records; Inspection Rights. 

The Borrower will, and will cause each of its Material Subsidiaries to, keep proper books of record and account in which
entries that are full, true and correct in all material respects are made of all dealings and transactions in relation to its business and activities. The Borrower will, and will cause each of its Subsidiaries to, permit any representatives
designated by the Administrative Agent or any Lender, upon reasonable prior notice, to visit and inspect its properties, to examine and make extracts from its books and records, and to discuss its affairs, finances and condition with its officers
and independent accountants, all at such reasonable times and as often as reasonably requested. 
 SECTION 5.07.
Compliance with Laws and Contractual Obligations. 
 The Borrower will, and will cause each of its Subsidiaries to,
comply with all laws (including Environmental Laws and the applicable provisions of ERISA), rules, regulations and orders of any Governmental Authority applicable to it or its property and all Contractual Obligations binding upon it or its property,
except where the failure to do so, individually or in the aggregate, could not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect. 

SECTION 5.08. Use of Proceeds and Letters of Credit. 

The proceeds of the Loans and Letters of Credit will be used only for general corporate and working capital purposes of the
Borrower and its Subsidiaries (including, without limitation, (a) to support Permitted Obligations, (b) to replace Existing Letters of Credit, (c) to effect Permitted Litigation Bonding, (d) to pay, satisfy and/or otherwise
discharge judgments rendered against the Borrower or any other Subsidiary from time to time, (e) to refinance, repay or retire Indebtedness, and (f) to make payments under the Master Settlement Agreement and under any other settlement
agreement in respect of tobacco litigation that the Borrower and/or any of its Subsidiaries is now or hereafter party to or bound by, (g) to pay dividends on and to repurchase common stock of the Borrower, to the extent permitted by
Section 6.05; provided that, in the case of any repurchase by the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries of Equity Interests of the Borrower made with all or any portion of the proceeds of any Loan, all of such Equity Interests so
repurchased are immediately cancelled, (h) to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Transactions and (i) to effect acquisitions to the extent permitted by this Agreement). No part of the proceeds of any Loan or Letter of
Credit will be used, whether directly or indirectly, for any purpose that entails a violation of any of the regulations of the Board, including Regulations T, U and X, including to purchase or carry any Margin Stock or to extend credit for the
purpose of purchasing or carrying any Margin Stock, in each case, in violation of Regulations T, U or X. After application of the proceeds of any Loan or Letter of Credit, not more than 25.0% of the value of the assets of the Borrower and its
Subsidiaries will be represented by Margin Stock. 

  
 57 








 SECTION 5.09. Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement; Further Assurances. 

(a) The Borrower agrees to (i) cause each Material Subsidiary of the Borrower established, created or acquired after the
Effective Date to execute and deliver a counterpart to the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement (and/or an assumption agreement in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent pursuant to which such Subsidiary shall become a
party to the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement) and thereby guaranty all Obligations and (ii) cause to be delivered to the Administrative Agent opinions of counsel and such certificates, resolutions and other documents as may be reasonably
requested by the Administrative Agent in connection with the execution and delivery of the documentation described in preceding clause (i). The actions required above by this Section 5.09(a) shall be completed not later than 30 days after the
establishment, creation or acquisition of the applicable Material Subsidiary (or such later date as agreed by the Administrative Agent in its sole discretion). 

(b) In the event that (i) any Subsidiary that is not then a Subsidiary Guarantor constitutes a “Material
Subsidiary” in accordance with the definition thereof on the last day of the then most recent fiscal year for which financial statements have been (or are required to be) furnished pursuant to Section 5.01(a) (and, upon written notice by
the Administrative Agent to the Borrower, at the last day of the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters ended prior to the date on which financial statements have been (or are required to be) furnished pursuant to Section 5.01(b) for the
fiscal quarter ended June 30) or (ii) the Borrower is obligated to designate one or more additional Subsidiaries as “Material Subsidiaries” as a result of the operation of the first proviso in the first sentence of the definition
of “Material Subsidiary”, then the Borrower shall promptly (and in any event within ten Business Days after the date such financial statements are so delivered or required to be so delivered) cause such Subsidiary to take the actions
described in Section 5.09(a) as if such Subsidiary had been newly created by the Borrower at such time. 
 (c)
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Section 5.09(a) or (b), in no event shall any Foreign Subsidiary which becomes a Material Subsidiary after the Effective Date be required to comply with the requirements of
Section 5.09(a) or (b), unless either (i) such Foreign Subsidiary would constitute a “Material Subsidiary” pursuant to clause (a) or (b) of the first sentence of the definition thereof (but, for this purpose only,
assuming each percentage set forth therein was 15.0% instead of 10.0%) or (ii) such Foreign Subsidiary would otherwise be required to be designated by the Borrower as a “Material Subsidiary” pursuant to the first proviso appearing in
the first sentence of the definition thereof, (but, for this purpose only, (x) assuming that each percentage set forth in such proviso was 20.0% instead of 15.0% and (y) after giving effect to any prior or concurrent designation by the
Borrower of any Domestic Subsidiary as a “Material Subsidiary”). 
 ARTICLE VI 

Negative Covenants 

Until the Commitments have expired or terminated and the principal of and interest on each Loan and all fees payable hereunder
have been paid in full and all Letters of Credit have expired or terminated (or been cash collateralized or back-stopped on terms satisfactory to each Issuing Bank) and all LC Disbursements shall have been reimbursed, the Borrower covenants and
agrees with the Lenders that: 

  
 58 








 SECTION 6.01. Liens. 

(a) The Borrower will not, and will not permit any of its Subsidiaries to: 

(i) mortgage or pledge as security for any Indebtedness any Principal Property of the Borrower or any of its
Subsidiaries, whether such Principal Property is owned on the Effective Date or hereafter acquired, unless the Borrower secures or causes such Subsidiary to secure the Obligations equally and ratably with all Indebtedness secured by such mortgage or
pledge, so long as such Indebtedness shall be so secured; and 
 (ii) mortgage or pledge as security for any
Indebtedness any shares of stock, Indebtedness or other obligations of a Subsidiary of the Borrower held by or owed to any of the Borrower or such Subsidiary, whether such shares of stock, Indebtedness or other obligations are owned on the Effective
Date or hereafter acquired, unless the Borrower secures or causes such Subsidiary to secure the Obligations equally and ratably with all such Indebtedness secured by such mortgage or pledge, so long as such Indebtedness shall be so secured;
provided, however, that this covenant shall not apply in the case of: 
 (A) the creation of any
mortgage, pledge or other Lien on any shares of stock, Indebtedness or other obligations of a Subsidiary or any Principal Property hereafter acquired (including acquisitions by way of merger or consolidation) by the Borrower or a Subsidiary
contemporaneously with such acquisition, or within 120 days thereafter, to secure or provide for the payment or financing of any part of the purchase price thereof, or the assumption of any mortgage, pledge or other Lien upon any shares of stock,
Indebtedness or other obligations of a Subsidiary or any Principal Property acquired hereafter existing at the time of such acquisition, or the acquisition of any shares of stock, Indebtedness or other obligations of a Subsidiary or any Principal
Property subject to any mortgage, pledge or other Lien without the assumption thereof, provided that every such mortgage, pledge or Lien referred to in this clause (A) shall attach only to the shares of stock, Indebtedness or other
obligations of a Subsidiary or any Principal Property so acquired and fixed improvements thereon; 
 (B) any
mortgage, pledge or other Lien on any shares of stock, Indebtedness or other obligations of a Subsidiary or any Principal Property existing on the Effective Date and set forth on Schedule 6.01; 

(C) any mortgage, pledge or other Lien on any shares of stock, Indebtedness or other obligations of a
Subsidiary or any Principal Property in favor of the Borrower or any Subsidiary; 
 (D) any mortgage, pledge
or other Lien on Principal Property being constructed or improved securing loans to finance such construction or improvements; 

(E) any mortgage, pledge or other Lien on shares of stock, Indebtedness or other obligations of a Subsidiary
or any Principal Property incurred in connection with the issuance of tax-exempt governmental obligations; or 

(F) any renewal of or substitution for any mortgage, pledge or other Lien permitted by any of the preceding
clauses (A) through (E), provided, that in the case of a mortgage, pledge or other Lien permitted under clause (B), (C) or (E), the debt secured is not increased nor the Lien extended to any additional assets. 

  
 59 








 (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 6.01(a), the Borrower or any
Subsidiary may create or assume Liens in addition to those permitted by Section 6.01(a), and renew, extend or replace such Liens, provided, that at the time of such creation, assumption, renewal, extension or replacement, and
after giving effect thereto, Exempted Debt does not exceed 10.0% of Consolidated Net Worth. 
 SECTION 6.02. Sale and
Leaseback Transactions. 
 (a) The Borrower will not, and will not permit any Subsidiary to, sell or transfer, directly
or indirectly, except to the Borrower or a Subsidiary, any Principal Property as an entirety, or any substantial portion thereof, with the intention of taking back a lease of such property, except a lease for a period of three years or less at the
end of which it is intended that the use of such property by the lessee will be discontinued; provided, that the Borrower or any Subsidiary may sell any such Principal Property and lease it back for a longer period if (i) the Borrower or
such Subsidiary would be entitled, pursuant to the provisions of Section 6.01(a), to create a mortgage on the property to be leased securing Funded Debt in an amount equal to the Attributable Debt with respect to such sale and lease-back
transaction without equally and ratably securing the Obligations or (ii) (A) the Borrower promptly informs the Administrative Agent of such transaction, (B) the net proceeds of such transaction are at least equal to the fair value (as
determined by the Board of Directors) of such property and (C) the Borrower causes an amount equal to the net proceeds of the sale to be applied to the retirement, within 120 days after receipt of such proceeds, of Funded Debt incurred or
assumed by the Borrower or a Subsidiary and/or the Obligations; provided further, that in the case of Funded Debt in the form of debentures or notes issued under an indenture, in lieu of applying all of or any part of such net proceeds
to such retirement, the Borrower may, within 75 days after such sale, deliver or cause to be delivered to the applicable trustee for cancellation either debentures or notes evidencing Funded Debt of the Borrower or of a Subsidiary previously
authenticated and delivered by the applicable trustee, and not theretofore tendered for sinking fund purposes or called for a sinking fund or otherwise applied as a credit against an obligation to redeem or retire such notes or debentures, and an
Officers’ Certificate (which certificate shall be delivered to the Administrative Agent) stating that the Borrower elects to deliver or cause to be delivered such debentures or notes in lieu of retiring Funded Debt as hereinabove provided. If
the Borrower shall so deliver debentures or notes to the applicable trustee and the Borrower shall duly deliver such Officers’ Certificate, the amount of cash which the Borrower shall be required to apply to the retirement of Funded Debt under
this Section 6.02(a) shall be reduced by an amount equal to the aggregate of the then applicable optional redemption prices (not including any optional sinking fund redemption prices) of such debentures or notes, or, if there are no such
redemption prices, the principal amount of such debentures or notes; provided, that in the case of debentures or notes which provide for an amount less than the principal amount thereof to be due and payable upon a declaration of the maturity
thereof, such amount of cash shall be reduced by the amount of principal of such debentures or notes that would be due and payable as of the date of such application upon a declaration of acceleration of the maturity thereof pursuant to the terms of
the indenture pursuant to which such debentures or notes were issued. 
 (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of
Section 6.02(a), the Borrower or any Subsidiary may enter into sale and lease-back transactions in addition to those permitted by Section 6.02(a) and without any obligation to retire any Obligations or other Funded Debt, provided,
that at the time of entering into such sale and lease-back transactions and after giving effect thereto, Exempted Debt does not exceed 10.0% of Consolidated Net Worth. 

SECTION 6.03. Fundamental Changes. 

The Borrower will not, and will not permit any Material Subsidiary to, merge into or consolidate with any other Person, or
permit any other Person to merge into or consolidate with it, or sell, 

  
 60 








 
convey, transfer, lease or otherwise dispose of (in one transaction or in a series of transactions) all or substantially all of its assets, or all or substantially all of the stock or other
Equity Interests of any of its Material Subsidiaries (in each case, whether now owned or hereafter acquired), or liquidate or dissolve, except that, if at the time thereof and immediately after giving effect thereto no Default shall have occurred
and be continuing (i) any Person may merge into the Borrower in a transaction in which the Borrower is the surviving corporation, (ii) any Person (including, without limitation, any Material Subsidiary) may merge into any Subsidiary in a
transaction in which the surviving entity is a Subsidiary Guarantor, and (iii) any Material Subsidiary may sell, convey, transfer, lease or otherwise dispose of its assets to the Borrower or to another Subsidiary Guarantor. 

SECTION 6.04. Financial Condition Covenants. 

(a) Consolidated Leverage Ratio. The Borrower will not permit the Consolidated Leverage Ratio as at the last day of any
period of four consecutive fiscal quarters of the Borrower to exceed 3.00:1.00. 
 (b) Consolidated Interest Coverage
Ratio. The Borrower will not permit the Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio for any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters of the Borrower ending on the last day of a fiscal quarter of the Borrower to be less than 4.00:1.00. 

SECTION 6.05. Restricted Payments. 

The Borrower will not, and will not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, declare or make, or agree to pay or make, directly or
indirectly, any Restricted Payment (other than Restricted Payments payable solely in non-redeemable common stock or comparable common Equity Interests of the Borrower or any such Subsidiary), except: 

(a) any Subsidiary of the Borrower may make Restricted Payments to the Borrower or any wholly-owned Subsidiary
of the Borrower, and any non-wholly-owned Subsidiary of the Borrower may make cash Restricted Payments to its shareholders generally so long as the Borrower or its respective Subsidiary which owns the Equity Interest in the Subsidiary making such
Restricted Payment receives at least its proportionate share thereof (based upon its relative holding of the Equity Interests in the Subsidiary making such Restricted Payments and taking into account the relative preferences, if any, of the various
classes of Equity Interests of such Subsidiary); 
 (b) the Borrower may issue shares of its common stock
(i) in settlement of its obligations under stock-based compensation plans, and (ii) upon the exercise of any warrants or options or upon the conversion or redemption of any convertible or redeemable preferred or preference stock, and in
connection with any such exercise, conversion or redemption, the Borrower may, so long as no Event of Default then exists or would result therefrom, pay cash in lieu of issuing fractional shares of its common stock; 

(c) the Borrower may declare and pay, or otherwise pay or make, any other Restricted Payment (including,
without limitation, any share repurchases, dividends and other distributions in respect of its Equity Interests), so long as (i) no Event of Default then exists or would result therefrom, (ii) on the date such Restricted Payment is
(x) paid or made (in the case of a Non-Declared Restricted Payment) or (y) (I) declared or otherwise authorized and (II) paid or made (in the case of any other Restricted Payment), the Borrower is in compliance with the


  
 61 








 
covenants contained in Section 6.04 for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters of the Borrower most recently ended prior to such date for which financial statements have been
delivered pursuant to Section 5.01, on a pro forma basis, as if the respective Restricted Payment made, declared or authorized had been paid (and any Indebtedness incurred (or to be incurred) to finance the same had been incurred) on the
first day of such period and (iii) in the case of any Restricted Payment in the form of a repurchase of Equity Interests of the Borrower and made with all or any portion of the proceeds of Loans, all of such Equity Interests so repurchased are
immediately cancelled; 
 (d) the Borrower may issue and exchange shares of any class or series of its
common stock now or hereafter outstanding for shares of any other class or series of its common stock now or hereafter outstanding; and 

(e) the Borrower may, in connection with any reclassification of its common stock and any exchange permitted
by clause (d) above, pay cash in lieu of issuing fractional shares of any class or series of its common stock. 

SECTION 6.06. Transactions with Affiliates. 

The Borrower will not, and will not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, sell, lease or otherwise transfer any property or
assets to, or purchase, lease or otherwise acquire any property or assets from, or otherwise engage in any other transactions with, any of its Affiliates, except (a) in the ordinary course of business at prices and on terms and conditions not
less favorable to the Borrower or such Subsidiary than could be obtained on an arm’s-length basis from unrelated third parties, (b) transactions between or among the Borrower and its wholly owned Subsidiaries not involving any other
Affiliate, (c) Restricted Payments permitted by Section 6.05, (d) customary fees paid to members of the board of directors of the Borrower and of its Subsidiaries (and to British American Tobacco p.l.c. in respect of services of its
employees acting as members of the Board of Directors of the Borrower as contemplated by the Governance Agreement), (e) the entering into, and making of payments under bonus plans, employment agreements, employee benefits plans, stock option
plans, indemnification provisions, severance arrangements, and other similar compensatory arrangements with officers, employees and directors of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business, and (f) charitable
contributions made by the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries to Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company Foundation, Reynolds American Foundation, American Snuff Charitable Trust or any other charitable foundation, trust or similar charitable organization
that is, at the time of such contribution, an Affiliate of the Borrower or any Subsidiary thereof, in each case consistent with past practices of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries as in effect on the Effective Date. 

SECTION 6.07. Restrictive Agreements. 

(a) The Borrower will not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, enter into, incur or permit to exist any
agreement or other arrangement that prohibits, restricts or imposes any condition upon the ability of any such Subsidiary (x) to pay dividends or other distributions with respect to any of its Equity Interests or to make or repay loans or
advances to the Borrower or any other Loan Party, (y) to Guarantee Indebtedness of the Borrower or any other Loan Party or (z) transfer any of its properties or assets to the Borrower or any other Loan Party; provided that
(i) the foregoing shall not apply to restrictions and conditions imposed by law or by this Agreement or any other Loan Document or by the Existing Term Loan Agreement (and any extension, renewal, replacement, amendment or modification thereof
so long as such extension, renewal, replacement, amendment or modification is no more restrictive with respect to such restrictions and conditions taken as a whole than those contained in the Existing Term Loan Agreement); (ii) the foregoing
shall not apply to restrictions and conditions 

  
 62 








 
existing on the date hereof or any extension, renewal, amendment or modification of any such restriction or condition (in each case, as long as such extension, renewal, amendment or modification
is no more restrictive with respect to such restrictions and conditions taken as a whole than those contained in the restrictions and conditions prior to such extension, renewal, amendment or modification); (iii) the foregoing shall not apply
to customary restrictions and conditions contained in agreements relating to the sale of assets (including Equity Interests) pending such sale, provided such restrictions and conditions apply only to the assets that are to be sold and such
sale is not prohibited hereunder; (iv) the foregoing shall not apply to any agreement or other instrument of a Person acquired by the Borrower or any Subsidiary that was in existence at the time of such acquisition (but not created in
contemplation thereof or to provide all or any portion of the funds or credit support utilized to consummate such acquisition), which restriction or condition is not applicable to any Person, or the properties or assets of any Person, other than the
Person or its Subsidiaries, or the property or assets of the Person or its Subsidiaries so acquired; (v) clause (z) of the foregoing shall not apply to Indebtedness secured by a Lien not otherwise prohibited hereunder that limits the right
of the debtor to dispose of the assets securing such Indebtedness; (vi) the foregoing shall not apply to customary provisions in joint venture agreements and other similar agreements relating solely to such joint venture entered into in the
ordinary course of business; (vii) the foregoing shall not apply to customary provisions contained in leases, licenses and other similar agreements entered into in the ordinary course of business that impose restrictions of the type described
in clause (z) above on the property subject to such lease; (viii) clauses (x) and (y) of the foregoing shall not apply to restrictions in the Existing Senior Notes Indentures or any other indenture or loan agreement, so long as
the restrictions in the Existing Senior Notes Indentures or such other indenture or loan agreement are no more burdensome than those appearing in the Existing Senior Notes Indentures as in effect on the Effective Date; (ix) clause (z) of
the foregoing shall not apply to customary restrictions contained in any documentation governing any sale and leaseback transaction not prohibited by this Agreement, so long as such restriction is applicable only to the assets pledged pursuant to
such sale and leaseback transaction; and (x) clause (z) of the foregoing shall not apply to any agreements governing any purchase money Liens or Capital Lease Obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business and not otherwise
prohibited hereby (in which case, any prohibition or limitation shall only be effective against the assets financed thereby). 

(b) The Borrower will not, and will not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, enter into, incur or permit
to exist any agreement or other arrangement that prohibits, restricts or imposes any condition upon the ability of the Borrower or any Subsidiary to create, incur, assume or suffer to exist any Lien upon any of its property or assets, whether now
owned or hereafter acquired, to secure the Obligations or, in the case of any Subsidiary Guarantor, its obligations under the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement, other than (x) this Agreement and the other Loan Documents, or the Existing Term Loan
Agreement (and any extension, renewal, replacement, amendment or modification thereof so long as such extension, renewal, replacement, amendment or modification is no more restrictive with respect to such restrictions and conditions taken as a whole
than those contained in the Existing Term Loan Agreement), (y) any agreement described in (and permitted by) clauses (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix) and (x) of the first proviso in Section 6.07(a), and
(z) agreements containing negative pledges and restrictions on Liens in favor of any holder of Indebtedness not prohibited by this Agreement but only if such negative pledge or restriction expressly permits Liens for the benefit of the
Administrative Agent and the Lenders with respect to the Facility and the Obligations under the Loan Documents on a senior basis (in an aggregate principal amount equal to at least the sum of the Commitments (or, if terminated, the Revolving Credit
Exposures) on the date of the incurrence thereof) and without a requirement that such holders of such Indebtedness be secured by such Liens equally and ratably or on a junior basis. 

  
 63 








 SECTION 6.08. Subsidiary Indebtedness. 

The Borrower will not permit the aggregate principal amount of Indebtedness of its Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries (excluding any
Indebtedness of a Subsidiary of the Borrower owed to the Borrower or another Subsidiary of the Borrower, but including any Guarantee by a Non-Guarantor Subsidiary of Indebtedness of the Borrower) at any time to exceed $200,000,000. 

SECTION 6.09. End of Fiscal Years; Fiscal Quarters. 

The Borrower will not, and will not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, cause (i) its or any of its Subsidiaries’
fiscal years to end on any day other than December 31 of each calendar year and (ii) its or any of its Subsidiaries’ fiscal quarters to end on any day other than March 31, June 30, September 30 and
December 31 of each calendar year. 
 ARTICLE VII 

Events of Default 

If any of the following events (each, an “Event of Default”) shall occur: 

(a) the Borrower shall fail to pay any principal of any Loan or any reimbursement obligation in respect of any LC Disbursement
when and as the same shall become due and payable, whether at the due date thereof or at a date fixed for prepayment thereof or otherwise; 

(b) the Borrower shall fail to pay any interest on any Loan or any fee or any other amount (other than an amount referred to
in clause (a) of this Article VII) payable under this Agreement or any other Loan Document, when and as the same shall become due and payable, and such failure shall continue unremedied for a period of five Business Days; 

(c) any representation or warranty made or deemed made by any Loan Party in or pursuant to this Agreement or any other Loan
Document or any amendment or modification hereof or waiver hereunder or thereunder, or in any written report, certificate or financial statement furnished pursuant to or in connection with this Agreement or any other Loan Document or any amendment
or modification hereof or waiver hereunder or thereunder, shall prove to have been incorrect in any material respect when made or deemed made; 

(d) the Borrower shall fail to observe or perform any covenant, condition or agreement contained in Section 5.02, 5.03
(with respect to the Borrower’s existence only) or 5.08 or in Article VI; 
 (e) the Borrower shall fail to
observe or perform any covenant, condition or agreement contained in this Agreement (other than those specified in clause (a), (b) or (d) of this Article VII), and such failure shall continue unremedied for a period of 30 days after
notice thereof from the Administrative Agent to the Borrower (which notice will be given at the request of any Lender); 

(f) the Borrower or any Subsidiary shall fail to make any payment (whether of principal or interest and regardless of
amount) in respect of any Material Indebtedness, when and as the same shall become due and payable (after giving effect to any applicable grace or cure period); 

(g) any event or condition occurs that results in any Material Indebtedness becoming due prior to its scheduled maturity or
that enables or permits (after giving effect to any applicable grace or cure period) the holder or holders of any Material Indebtedness or any trustee or agent on its or their behalf to cause any Material Indebtedness to become due, or to require
the prepayment, repurchase, 

  
 64 








 
redemption or defeasance thereof, prior to its scheduled maturity; provided that this clause (g) shall not apply to (i) secured Indebtedness that becomes due as a result of the
voluntary sale or transfer of the property or assets securing such Indebtedness or (ii) Indebtedness that becomes due as a result of the delivery of a notice of a voluntary prepayment or redemption; 

(h) an involuntary proceeding shall be commenced or an involuntary petition shall be filed seeking (i) liquidation,
reorganization or other relief in respect of the Borrower or any Material Subsidiary or its debts, or of a substantial part of its assets, under any Federal, state or foreign bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar law now or hereafter in
effect or (ii) the appointment of a receiver, trustee, custodian, sequestrator, conservator or similar official for the Borrower or any Material Subsidiary or for a substantial part of its assets, and, in any such case, such proceeding or
petition shall continue undismissed for 60 days or an order or decree approving or ordering any of the foregoing shall be entered; 

(i) the Borrower or any Material Subsidiary shall (i) voluntarily commence any proceeding or file any petition seeking
liquidation, reorganization or other relief under any Federal, state or foreign bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar law now or hereafter in effect, (ii) consent to the institution of, or fail to contest in a timely and appropriate
manner, any proceeding or petition described in clause (h) of this Article VII, (iii) apply for or consent to the appointment of a receiver, trustee, custodian, sequestrator, conservator or similar official for the Borrower or any Material
Subsidiary or for a substantial part of its assets, (iv) file an answer admitting the material allegations of a petition filed against it in any such proceeding, (v) make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors or (vi) take
any action for the purpose of effecting any of the foregoing; 
 (j) the Borrower or any Material Subsidiary shall become
unable, admit in writing its inability or fail generally to pay its debts as they become due; 
 (k) one or more judgments
for the payment of money (to the extent not covered by insurance from a reputable third-party insurer which has been notified of such judgment and has not denied coverage) in an aggregate amount in excess of $200,000,000 shall be rendered against
the Borrower, any Material Subsidiary or any combination thereof and one or more of the following shall have occurred with respect thereto: (i) such judgment shall continue to remain undischarged, unpaid or Unsettled for a period of
60 consecutive days during which execution shall not be effectively stayed (by reason of a court proceeding or a valid, binding and enforceable written agreement with the beneficiary of such judgment), vacated or bonded by reason of a pending
appeal, (ii) at the time of (and after giving effect to) the payment or satisfaction of such judgment (or the deposit or pledge of cash or other assets, or the issuance of any letter of credit or similar instrument, for the purpose of bonding
or securing in any manner such judgment or securing any appeal thereof), the sum of (x) the aggregate amount of Unrestricted cash and Marketable Investments held by the Borrower and its Subsidiaries plus (y) the aggregate Unused
Availability plus (z) the aggregate amount of any undrawn term loan commitments in effect at any time under the Existing Term Loan Agreement (and any extension, renewal, replacement, amendment or modification thereof) actually available
to be drawn at such time thereunder, is less than $200,000,000, or (iii) any action shall be legally taken by a judgment creditor to attach or levy upon any assets of the Borrower or any Material Subsidiary to enforce any such judgment; 

(l) an ERISA Event shall have occurred that, in the opinion of the Required Lenders, when taken together with all other ERISA
Events that have occurred, could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect; 
 (m) a Change in Control
shall occur; or 

  
 65 








 (n) the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement or any provision thereof shall cease to be
in full force or effect as to any Subsidiary Guarantor (except, in any such case, where such Subsidiary Guarantor has been released from the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement in accordance with the terms thereof), or any Subsidiary Guarantor or any
Person acting for or on behalf of any Subsidiary Guarantor shall deny or disaffirm such Subsidiary Guarantor’s obligations under the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement or any Subsidiary Guarantor shall default in the due performance or observance
of any term, covenant or agreement on its part to be performed or observed pursuant to the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement; 
 then, and in
every such event (other than an event with respect to the Borrower described in clause (h) or (i) of this Article VII), and at any time thereafter during the continuance of such event, the Administrative Agent may, and at the request of
the Required Lenders shall, by notice to the Borrower, take any of the following actions, at the same or different times: (i) terminate the Commitments, and thereupon the Commitments shall terminate immediately, (ii) declare the Loans
then outstanding to be due and payable in whole (or in part, in which case any principal not so declared to be due and payable may thereafter be declared to be due and payable), and thereupon the principal of the Loans so declared to be due and
payable, together with accrued interest thereon and all fees and other obligations of the Borrower accrued hereunder, shall become due and payable immediately, without presentment, demand, protest or other notice of any kind, all of which are hereby
waived by the Borrower and (iii) enforce the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement; and in case of any event with respect to the Borrower described in clause (h) or (i) of this Article VII, the Commitments shall automatically terminate and
the principal of the Loans then outstanding, together with accrued interest thereon and all fees and other obligations of the Borrower accrued hereunder, shall automatically become due and payable, without presentment, demand, protest or other
notice of any kind, all of which are hereby waived by the Borrower. 
 ARTICLE VIII 

The Agents 

Each of the Lenders and each Issuing Bank hereby irrevocably appoints the Administrative Agent as its agent and authorizes the
Administrative Agent to take such actions on its behalf and to exercise such powers as are delegated to the Administrative Agent by the terms of this Agreement or any other Loan Document, together with such actions and powers as are reasonably
incidental thereto. 
 The bank serving as the Administrative Agent hereunder shall have the same rights and powers in its
capacity as a Lender as any other Lender and may exercise the same as though it were not the Administrative Agent, and such bank and its Affiliates may accept deposits from, lend money to and generally engage in any kind of business with the
Borrower or any Subsidiary or other Affiliate thereof as if it were not the Administrative Agent hereunder. 
 The
Administrative Agent shall not have any duties or obligations except those expressly set forth herein. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, (a) the Administrative Agent shall not be subject to any fiduciary or other implied duties,
regardless of whether a Default has occurred and is continuing, (b) the Administrative Agent shall not have any duty to take any discretionary action or exercise any discretionary powers, except discretionary rights and powers expressly
contemplated hereby that the Administrative Agent is required to exercise in writing as directed by the Required Lenders (or such other number or percentage of the Lenders as shall be necessary under the circumstances as provided in
Section 9.02), and (c) except as expressly set forth herein, the Administrative Agent shall not have any duty to disclose, and shall not be liable for the failure to disclose, any information relating to the Borrower or any of its
Subsidiaries that is communicated to or obtained by the bank serving as 

  
 66 








 
Administrative Agent or any of its Affiliates in any capacity. The Administrative Agent shall not be liable for any action taken or not taken by it with the consent or at the request of the
Required Lenders (or such other number or percentage of the Lenders as shall be necessary under the circumstances as provided in Section 9.02) or in the absence of its own gross negligence or willful misconduct. The Administrative Agent shall
be deemed not to have knowledge of any Default unless and until written notice thereof is given to the Administrative Agent by the Borrower or a Lender, and the Administrative Agent shall not be responsible for or have any duty to ascertain or
inquire into (i) any statement, warranty or representation made in or in connection with any Loan Document, (ii) the contents of any certificate, report or other document delivered hereunder or in connection herewith, (iii) the
performance or observance of any of the covenants, agreements or other terms or conditions set forth in any Loan Document, (iv) the validity, enforceability, effectiveness or genuineness of this Agreement or any other Loan Document, or
(v) the satisfaction of any condition set forth in Article IV or elsewhere in any Loan Document, other than to confirm receipt of items expressly required to be delivered to the Administrative Agent. 

The Administrative Agent shall be entitled to rely upon, and shall not incur any liability for relying upon, any notice,
request, certificate, consent, statement, instrument, document or other writing believed by it to be genuine and to have been signed or sent by the proper Person. The Administrative Agent also may rely upon any statement made to it orally or by
telephone and believed by it to be made by the proper Person, and shall not incur any liability for relying thereon. The Administrative Agent may consult with legal counsel (who may be counsel for the Borrower), independent accountants and other
experts selected by it, and shall not be liable for any action taken or not taken by it in accordance with the advice of any such counsel, accountants or experts. 

The Administrative Agent may perform any and all its duties and exercise its rights and powers by or through any one or more
sub-agents appointed by the Administrative Agent. The Administrative Agent and any such sub-agent may perform any and all its duties and exercise its rights and powers through their respective Related Parties. The exculpatory provisions of the
preceding paragraphs shall apply to any such sub-agent and to the Related Parties of the Administrative Agent and any such sub-agent, and shall apply to their respective activities in connection with the syndication of the credit facilities provided
for herein as well as activities as Administrative Agent. 
 Subject to the appointment and acceptance of a successor
Administrative Agent as provided in this paragraph, the Administrative Agent may resign at any time by notifying the Lenders, the Issuing Banks and the Borrower. Upon any such resignation, the Required Lenders shall have the right, with (if no
Default then exists) the consent of the Borrower (not to be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned), to appoint a successor. If no successor shall have been so appointed by the Required Lenders and shall have accepted such appointment within
30 days after the retiring Administrative Agent gives notice of its resignation, then the retiring Administrative Agent may, on behalf of the Lenders and the Issuing Banks, with the consent of the Borrower (not to be unreasonably withheld,
delayed or conditioned) if no Default then exists, appoint a successor Administrative Agent, which shall be a bank with an office in New York, New York, or an Affiliate of any such bank. Upon the acceptance of its appointment as Administrative Agent
hereunder by a successor, such successor shall succeed to and become vested with all the rights, powers, privileges and duties of the retiring Administrative Agent, and the retiring Administrative Agent shall be discharged from its duties and
obligations hereunder. The fees payable by the Borrower to a successor Administrative Agent shall be the same as those payable to its predecessor unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and such successor. After the Administrative Agent’s
resignation hereunder, the provisions of this Article VIII and Section 9.03 shall continue in effect for the benefit of such retiring Administrative Agent, its sub-agents and their respective Related
Parties in respect of any actions taken or omitted to be taken by any of them while it was acting as Administrative Agent. 

  
 67 








 Each Lender acknowledges that it has, independently and without reliance upon the
Administrative Agent or any other Lender and based on such documents and information as it has deemed appropriate, made its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this Agreement. Each Lender also acknowledges that it will, independently and
without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Lender and based on such documents and information as it shall from time to time deem appropriate, continue to make its own decisions in taking or not taking action under or based upon this
Agreement, any other Loan Document, any related agreement or any document furnished hereunder or thereunder. 

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, each of the financial institutions named as “Syndication
Agent”, “Joint Bookrunner”, “Joint Lead Arranger” and “Documentation Agent” on the cover page of this Agreement is named as such for recognition purposes only, and in its capacity as such shall have no powers,
duties, responsibilities or liabilities with respect to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby; it being understood and agreed that each such financial institution in its stated capacity shall be entitled to all indemnification and
reimbursement rights in favor of the Administrative Agent as, and to the extent, provided for under this Article VIII and Section 9.03. Without limitation of the foregoing, no such financial institution shall, solely by reason of this Agreement
or any other Loan Document, have any fiduciary relationship in respect of any Lender or any other Person. 
 No Designated
Swap Bank that obtains the benefits hereof or of the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement by virtue of the provisions hereof or the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement shall have any right to notice of any action or to consent to, direct or object to any
action hereunder or under any other Loan Document or otherwise other than in its capacity as a Lender and, in such case, only to the extent expressly provided in the Loan Documents. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Article VIII to the
contrary, the Administrative Agent shall not be required to verify the payment of, or that other satisfactory arrangements have been made with respect to, Designated Swap Obligations unless the Administrative Agent has received written notice of
such Designated Swap Obligations, together with such supporting documentation as the Administrative Agent may request, from the applicable Designated Swap Bank. 

ARTICLE IX 
 Miscellaneous

 SECTION 9.01. Notices. 

(a) Except in the case of notices and other communications expressly permitted to be given by telephone (and subject to
Section 9.01(b) below), all notices and other communications provided for herein shall be in writing and shall be delivered by hand or overnight courier service, mailed by certified or registered mail or sent by telecopy, as follows: 

(i) if to the Borrower, to it at P.O. Box 2990, 401 N. Main Street, Winston-Salem, NC, 27102, Attention of
Treasurer (Telecopy No. (336) 741-2998), with a copy to it at P.O. Box 2990, 401 N. Main Street, Winston-Salem, NC, 27102, Attention of Corporate Secretary (Telecopy No. (336) 741-2998); 

(ii) if to the Administrative Agent, to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 500 Stanton Christiana Road, Ops 2, Floor
03, Newark, DE 19713, Attention of Amanda Collins (Telecopy No. (201) 244-3577), with a copy to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 500 Stanton Christiana Road, Ops 2, Floor 03, Newark, DE 19713, Attention of Heshan Wanigasekera (Telecopy No.
(201) 244-3577); 

  
 68 








 (iii) if to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., in its capacity as an
Issuing Bank, to it at 10420 Highland Manor Drive, Floor 4, Tampa, FL 33610-9128, Attention of GTS Client Services (Telecopy No. (312) 288-8950); 

(iv) if to JPMCB in its capacity as a Swingline Lender, to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 500 Stanton Christiana
Road, Ops 2, Floor 03, Newark, DE 19713, Attention of Amanda Collins (Telecopy No. (201) 244-3577), with a copy to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 500 Stanton Christiana Road, Ops 2, Floor 03, Newark, DE 19713, Attention of Heshan Wanigasekera
(Telecopy No. (201) 244-3577); 
 (v) if to Citibank in its capacity as a Swingline Lender, to Citibank
N.A., 1615 Brett Road, Building III, New Castle, DE 19720, Attention of Loan Administration (Telecopy No. (212) 994-0847); and 

(vi) if to any other Lender, to it at its address (or telecopy number) set forth in its Administrative
Questionnaire. 
 (b) Notices and other communications to the Lenders hereunder may be delivered or furnished by electronic
communications pursuant to procedures approved by the Administrative Agent; provided that the foregoing shall not apply to notices pursuant to Article II unless otherwise agreed by the Administrative Agent and the applicable Lender. Each of
the Administrative Agent or the Borrower may, in its discretion, agree to accept notices and other communications to it hereunder by electronic communications pursuant to procedures approved by it; provided that approval of such procedures
may be limited to particular notices or communications. 
 (c) Any party hereto may change its address or telecopy number
for notices and other communications hereunder by written notice to the other parties hereto. All notices and other communications given to any party hereto in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been given on
the date of receipt. 
 SECTION 9.02. Waivers; Amendments. 

(a) No failure or delay by the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank or any Lender in exercising any right or power hereunder
or under any other Loan Document shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any such right or power, or any abandonment or discontinuance of steps to enforce such a right or power, preclude any other or further
exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right or power. The rights and remedies of the Administrative Agent, the Issuing Banks and the Lenders hereunder or under any other Loan Document are cumulative and are not exclusive of any rights or
remedies that they would otherwise have. No waiver of any provision of any Loan Document or consent to any departure by the Borrower therefrom shall in any event be effective unless the same shall be permitted by Section 9.02(b), and then such
waiver or consent shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the purpose for which given. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the making of a Loan or issuance of a Letter of Credit shall not be construed as a waiver of
any Default, regardless of whether the Administrative Agent, any Lender or any Issuing Bank may have had notice or knowledge of such Default at the time. 

(b) Neither this Agreement nor any other Loan Document nor any provision hereof or thereof may be waived, amended or modified
except pursuant to an agreement or agreements in writing entered into by the Borrower and the Required Lenders or by the Borrower and the Administrative Agent with the consent of the Required Lenders; provided that no such agreement shall
(i) increase the Commitment of any Lender without the written consent of such Lender, (ii) reduce (or forgive) the 

  
 69 








 
principal amount of any Loan or LC Disbursement or reduce the rate of interest thereon, or reduce any fees payable hereunder (including, without limitation, by changing the specific rating levels
in any Category in the definition of Applicable Rate that would result in a reduction of any interest rate on any Loan or any fee payable hereunder), without the written consent of each Lender directly affected thereby, (iii) postpone the
scheduled date of payment of the principal amount of any Loan or LC Disbursement, or any interest thereon, or any fees or other amounts payable hereunder, or reduce the amount of, waive or excuse any such payment, or postpone the scheduled date of
expiration of any Commitment, without the written consent of each Lender directly affected thereby; provided, however, that only the consent of the Required Lenders shall be necessary to waive the applicability of any post-default
increase in interest rates, (iv) change (x) Section 2.10(b) or Section 2.17(b) or (c) in a manner that would alter the pro rata sharing of payments required thereby and (y) Section 2.08(e) in a manner that would
alter the pro rata termination or reduction of commitments required thereby, without the written consent of each Lender directly affected thereby, (v) change any of the provisions of this Section 9.02(b) or the definition of “Required
Lenders” or any other provision hereof specifying the number or percentage of Lenders required to waive, amend or modify any rights hereunder or make any determination or grant any consent hereunder, without the prior written consent of each
Lender or (vi) release all or substantially all of the Subsidiary Guarantors from their obligations under the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement (except as expressly permitted by the terms hereof and thereof), without the prior written consent of
each Lender; provided further that no such agreement shall amend, modify or otherwise affect the rights or duties of the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank or any Swingline Lender hereunder or waive, amend or modify Section 2.19,
without the prior written consent of the Administrative Agent, such Issuing Bank or such Swingline Lender, as the case may be. 

SECTION 9.03. Expenses; Indemnity; Damage Waiver. 

(a) The Borrower shall pay (i) all documented reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred by each Lead Agent and its Affiliates, including the invoiced and reasonable fees, charges and disbursements of one counsel for the Lead
Agents (and, if advisable in the judgment of the Lead Agents, of one local counsel in any relevant jurisdiction), in connection with the syndication of the Facility, the preparation and administration of this Agreement and the other Loan Documents
or any amendments, modifications or waivers of the provisions hereof or thereof (whether or not the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby shall be consummated), (ii) all documented reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by each
Issuing Bank in connection with the issuance, amendment, renewal or extension of any Letter of Credit or any demand for payment thereunder and (iii) all documented reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the Administrative Agent, any
Issuing Bank or any Lender, including the fees, charges and disbursements of any counsel for the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank or any Lender, in connection with the enforcement or protection of its rights in connection with this Agreement
and the other Loan Documents, including its rights under this Section 9.03, or in connection with the Loans made or Letters of Credit issued hereunder, including all such out-of-pocket expenses incurred
during any workout, restructuring or negotiations in respect of such Loans or Letters of Credit. 
 (b) The Borrower shall
indemnify each Lead Agent, each Issuing Bank and each Lender, and each Related Party of any of the foregoing Persons (each such Person being called an “Indemnitee”) against, and hold each Indemnitee harmless from, any and all
losses, claims, damages, liabilities and related expenses, including the fees, charges and disbursements of counsel for any Indemnitee (limited, however, in the case of fees, charges and disbursements of counsel, to those of (x) one counsel for
all Indemnitees in connection with indemnification losses, claims, damages and liabilities arising out of the same facts or circumstances, (y) if necessary or advisable in the judgment of an Indemnitee (or its counsel), a single local counsel
to the Indemnitees in each relevant jurisdiction and (z) solely in the case of an actual or perceived conflict of interest, if necessary or advisable in the judgment of such affected Indemnitee (or its counsel) in each applicable jurisdiction,
one additional counsel to such 

  
 70 








 
affected Indemnitee in each applicable jurisdiction), incurred by or asserted against any Indemnitee arising out of, in connection with, or as a result of (i) the execution or delivery of
this Agreement or any other Loan Document, the performance by the parties hereto of their respective obligations hereunder or the consummation of the Transactions or any other transactions contemplated hereby, subject in all cases to the further
limitations in Section 9.03(a)(i) relating to fees, disbursements and charges of counsel, (ii) any Loan or Letter of Credit or the use of the proceeds therefrom (including any refusal by any Issuing Bank to honor a demand for payment under
a Letter of Credit if the documents presented in connection with such demand do not strictly comply with the terms of such Letter of Credit), (iii) any actual or alleged presence or release of Hazardous Materials on or from any property owned
or operated by the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, or any Environmental Liability related in any way to the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, or (iv) any actual or prospective claim, litigation, investigation or proceeding relating to
any of the foregoing, whether based on contract, tort or any other theory and whether or not any Indemnitee is a party thereto and whether or not such claim, litigation, investigation or proceeding is brought by or on behalf of any Loan Party;
provided that such indemnity shall not, as to any Indemnitee, be available to the extent that such losses, claims, damages, liabilities or related expenses are determined by a court of competent jurisdiction by final and nonappealable
judgment to have resulted from the bad faith, gross negligence or willful misconduct of such Indemnitee or a material breach of any Loan Document by such Indemnitee. This Section 9.03(b) shall not apply with respect to Taxes. 

(c) If any suit, action or proceeding is instituted involving any Indemnitee for which indemnification is to be sought
hereunder by such Indemnitee, then such Indemnitee will promptly notify the Borrower in writing of the commencement of any such suit, action or proceeding, provided, however, that the failure to notify the Borrower will not relieve the
Borrower from any liability that it may have to such Indemnitee hereunder or from any liability that it may have to such Indemnitee. Following such notification, the Borrower may elect in writing to assume the defense of such suit, action or
proceeding, and upon such election, it will not be liable for any legal costs subsequently incurred by such Indemnitee (other than reasonable costs of investigation and providing evidence) in connection therewith, unless (i) it has failed to
provide counsel reasonably satisfactory to such Indemnitee in a timely manner, or (ii) either the Indemnitee or counsel provided by the Borrower reasonably determines that its representation of such Indemnitee would present it with a conflict
of interest. The Borrower shall not be liable for any settlement by any Indemnitee of any suit, action, claim or other proceeding for which indemnification is to be sought hereunder by such Indemnitee if such settlement is effected without the
Borrower’s prior written consent, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld, but if settled with the Borrower’s written consent, or if there is a final judgment against an Indemnitee in any such proceeding, the Borrower agrees to
indemnify and hold harmless each Indemnitee to the extent and in the manner set forth above. Notwithstanding the immediately preceding sentence, if at any time an Indemnitee shall have requested in accordance with this Agreement that the Borrower
reimburse such Indemnitee for reasonable, documented legal expenses or other reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with investigating or defending any proceeding, the Borrower shall be liable for any settlement of any proceeding effected
without the Borrower’s written consent if (i) the Borrower has been notified promptly (and in any event at least 5 business days in advance) of such proposed settlement and such settlement is entered into at least 30 days after receipt by
Borrower of such request for reimbursement and (ii) the Borrower shall not have reimbursed such Indemnitee in accordance with such request prior to the date of such settlement for all requested reimbursement amounts for which such Indemnitee is
entitled in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The Borrower shall not, without the prior written consent of the affected Indemnitee, effect any settlement of any pending or threatened proceeding against such
Indemnitee in respect of which indemnity has been sought hereunder by such Indemnitee unless such settlement (i) includes an unconditional release of such Indemnitee in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to such Indemnitee from all
liability or claims that are the subject matter of such proceeding and (ii) does not include any statement as to or any admission of fault, culpability, wrongdoing or a failure to act by or on behalf of any Indemnitee. 

  
 71 








 (d) To the extent that the Borrower fails to pay any amount required to be paid
by it to a Lead Agent, an Issuing Bank or a Swingline Lender under Section 9.03(a), (b) or (c), each Lender severally agrees to pay to such Lead Agent, such Issuing Bank or such Swingline Lender, as the case may be, such Lender’s
Applicable Percentage (determined as of the time that the applicable unreimbursed expense or indemnity payment is sought) of such unpaid amount; provided that the unreimbursed expense or indemnified loss, claim, damage, liability or related
expense, as the case may be, was incurred by or asserted against such Lead Agent, such Issuing Bank or such Swingline Lender in its capacity as such. 

(e) To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Borrower shall not assert, and hereby waives, any claim against any
Indemnitee, on any theory of liability, for special, indirect, consequential or punitive damages (as opposed to direct or actual damages) arising out of, in connection with, or as a result of, this Agreement or any other Loan Document, the
Transactions, any Loan or Letter of Credit or the use of the proceeds thereof. 
 (f) All amounts due under this
Section 9.03 shall be payable not later than 30 days after the receipt of a reasonably detailed invoice therefor. 

SECTION 9.04. Successors and Assigns. 

(a) The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective
successors and assigns permitted hereby (including any Affiliate of any Issuing Bank that issues any Letter of Credit), except that (i) the Borrower may not assign or otherwise transfer any of its rights or obligations hereunder without the
prior written consent of each Lender (and any attempted assignment or transfer by the Borrower without such consent shall be null and void) and (ii) no Lender may assign or otherwise transfer its rights or obligations hereunder except in
accordance with this Section 9.04. Nothing in this Agreement, expressed or implied, shall be construed to confer upon any Person (other than the parties hereto, their respective successors and assigns permitted hereby (including any Affiliate
of any Issuing Bank that issues any Letter of Credit), Participants (to the extent provided in Section 9.04(c)) and, to the extent expressly contemplated hereby, the Related Parties of each of the Administrative Agent, the Issuing Banks and the
Lenders) any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or by reason of this Agreement. 
 (b) (i) Subject to the
conditions set forth in Section 9.04(b)(ii) below, any Lender may assign to one or more assignees all or a portion of its rights and obligations under this Agreement (including all or a portion of its Commitment and the Loans at the time owing
to it) with the prior written consent (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed) of: 
 (A)
the Borrower, provided that no consent of the Borrower shall be required for an assignment to a Lender, an Affiliate of a Lender, an Approved Fund or, if an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, any other assignee; and
provided, further, that the Borrower shall be deemed to have consented to any such assignment unless it shall object thereto by written notice to the Administrative Agent within 10 Business Days after having received written
notice thereof; 
 (B) the Administrative Agent, provided that no consent of the Administrative Agent
shall be required for an assignment of a Commitment to an assignee that is a Lender with a Commitment immediately prior to giving effect to such assignment; 

(C) each Swingline Lender; and 

  
 72 








 (D) each Issuing Bank. 

(ii) Assignments shall be subject to the following additional conditions: 

(A) except in the case of an assignment to a Lender, an Affiliate of a Lender or an Approved Fund or an
assignment of the entire remaining amount of the assigning Lender’s Commitment or Loans, the amount of the Commitment or Loans of the assigning Lender subject to each such assignment (determined as of the date the Assignment and Assumption with
respect to such assignment is delivered to the Administrative Agent) shall not be less than $5,000,000 unless each of the Borrower and the Administrative Agent otherwise consent, provided that no such consent of the Borrower shall be required
if an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing; 
 (B) each partial assignment shall be made as an
assignment of a proportionate part of all the assigning Lender’s rights and obligations under this Agreement; 

(C) the parties to each assignment shall execute and deliver to the Administrative Agent an Assignment and
Assumption, together with a processing and recordation fee of $3,500; 
 (D) the assignee, if it shall not
be a Lender, shall deliver to the Administrative Agent an Administrative Questionnaire in which the assignee designates one or more “Credit Contacts” to whom all syndicate-level information (which may contain material non-public
information about the Loan Parties and their related parties or their respective securities) will be made available and who may receive such information in accordance with the assignee’s compliance procedures and applicable laws, including
Federal and state securities laws; and 
 (E) Notwithstanding anything else in this Section 9.04 to the
contrary, none of the Borrower, its Subsidiaries or any natural person shall be an assignee hereunder. 

(iii) Subject to acceptance and recording thereof pursuant to Section 9.04(b)(iv), from and after the
effective date specified in each Assignment and Assumption the assignee thereunder shall be a party hereto and, to the extent of the interest assigned by such Assignment and Assumption, have the rights and obligations of a Lender under this
Agreement, and the assigning Lender thereunder shall, to the extent of the interest assigned by such Assignment and Assumption, be released from its obligations under this Agreement (and, in the case of an Assignment and Assumption covering all of
the assigning Lender’s rights and obligations under this Agreement, such Lender shall cease to be a party hereto but shall continue to be entitled to the benefits of Sections 2.14, 2.15, 2.16 and 9.03). Any assignment or transfer by a
Lender of rights or obligations under this Agreement that does not comply with this Section 9.04 shall be treated for purposes of this Agreement as a sale by such Lender of a participation in such rights and obligations in accordance with
Section 9.04(c). 
 (iv) The Administrative Agent, acting for this purpose as an agent of the Borrower,
shall maintain at one of its offices a copy of each Assignment and Assumption delivered to it and a register for the recordation of the names and addresses of the Lenders, and the Commitment of, and principal amount of the Loans and LC Disbursements
owing to, each Lender pursuant to the terms hereof from time to time (the “Register”). The entries in the 

  
 73 








 
Register shall be conclusive absent manifest error, and the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, the Issuing Banks and the Lenders shall treat each Person whose name is recorded in the Register
pursuant to the terms hereof as a Lender hereunder for all purposes of this Agreement, notwithstanding notice to the contrary. The Register shall be available for inspection by the Borrower, any Issuing Bank and any Lender, at any reasonable time
and from time to time upon reasonable prior notice. 
 (v) Upon its receipt of a duly completed Assignment
and Assumption executed by an assigning Lender and an assignee, the assignee’s completed Administrative Questionnaire (unless the assignee shall already be a Lender hereunder), the processing and recordation fee referred to in this
Section 9.04(b) and any written consent to such assignment required by this Section 9.04(b), the Administrative Agent shall accept such Assignment and Assumption and record the information contained therein in the Register; provided
that if either the assigning Lender or the assignee shall have failed to make any payment required to be made by it pursuant to Section 2.04(c), 2.05(e) or (f), 2.06(b), 2.17(d) or 9.03(d), the Administrative Agent shall have no obligation to
accept such Assignment and Assumption and record the information therein in the Register unless and until such payment shall have been made in full, together with all accrued interest thereon. No assignment shall be effective for purposes of this
Agreement unless it has been recorded in the Register as provided in this paragraph. 
 (c) Any Lender may, without the
consent of the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank or any Swingline Lender, sell participations to one or more banks or other entities (each, a “Participant”) in all or a portion of such Lender’s rights and
obligations under this Agreement (including all or a portion of its Commitment and the Loans owing to it); provided that (A) such Lender’s obligations under this Agreement shall remain unchanged, (B) such Lender shall remain
solely responsible to the other parties hereto for the performance of such obligations and (C) the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, each Issuing Bank and the other Lenders shall continue to deal solely and directly with such Lender in
connection with such Lender’s rights and obligations under this Agreement. Any agreement or instrument pursuant to which a Lender sells such a participation shall provide that such Lender shall retain the sole right to enforce this Agreement
and to approve any amendment, modification or waiver of any provision of this Agreement; provided that such agreement or instrument may provide that such Lender will not, without the consent of the Participant, agree to any amendment,
modification or waiver described in the first proviso to Section 9.02(b) that requires the affirmative consent of such Lender. The Borrower agrees that each Participant shall be entitled to the benefits of Sections 2.14, 2.15 and 2.16 (subject
to the requirements and limitations therein, including the requirements under Section 2.16(f) (it being understood that the documentation required under Section 2.16(f) shall be delivered to the participating Lender)) to the same extent as
if it were a Lender and had acquired its interest by assignment pursuant to Section 9.04(b); provided that such Participant (A) agrees to be subject to the provisions of Sections 2.17 and 2.18 as if it were an assignee under
Section 9.04(b); and (B) shall not be entitled to receive any greater payment under Sections 2.14 or 2.16, with respect to any participation, than its participating Lender would have been entitled to receive, except to the extent such
entitlement to receive a greater payment results from a Change in Law that occurs after the Participant acquired the applicable participation. To the extent permitted by law, each Participant also shall be entitled to the benefits of
Section 9.08 as though it were a Lender, provided such Participant agrees to be subject to Section 2.17(c) as though it were a Lender. 

(d) Any Lender may at any time pledge or assign a security interest in all or any portion of its rights under this Agreement
to secure obligations of such Lender, including without limitation any pledge or assignment to secure obligations to a Federal Reserve Bank, and this Section shall not apply to any such pledge or assignment of a security interest; provided
that no such pledge or assignment of a security interest shall release a Lender from any of its obligations hereunder or substitute any such pledgee or assignee for such Lender as a party hereto. 

  
 74 








 SECTION 9.05. Survival. 

All covenants, agreements, representations and warranties made by the Borrower herein and in the certificates or other
instruments delivered in connection with or pursuant to this Agreement or any other Loan Document shall be considered to have been relied upon by the other parties hereto and shall survive the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the other
Loan Documents and the making of any Loans and issuance of any Letters of Credit, regardless of any investigation made by any such other party or on its behalf and notwithstanding that the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank or any Lender may
have had notice or knowledge of any Default or incorrect representation or warranty at the time any credit is extended hereunder, and shall continue in full force and effect as long as the principal of or any accrued interest on any Loan or any fee
or any other amount payable under this Agreement is outstanding and unpaid or any Letter of Credit is outstanding and so long as the Commitments have not expired or terminated. The provisions of Sections 2.14, 2.15 and 9.03 and Article VIII shall
survive and remain in full force and effect regardless of the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, the repayment of the Loans, the expiration or termination of the Letters of Credit and the Commitments or the termination of this
Agreement or any provision hereof. 
 SECTION 9.06. Counterparts; Integration; Effectiveness. 

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts (and by different parties hereto on different counterparts), each of which
shall constitute an original, but all of which when taken together shall constitute a single contract. This Agreement, the other Loan Documents and any separate letter agreements with respect to fees payable to the Administrative Agent constitute
the entire contract among the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersede any and all previous agreements and understandings, oral or written, relating to the subject matter hereof. Except as provided in Section 4.01, this
Agreement shall become effective when it shall have been executed by the Administrative Agent and when the Administrative Agent shall have received counterparts hereof which, when taken together, bear the signatures of each of the other parties
hereto, and thereafter shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Agreement by telecopy shall be effective as
delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Agreement. 
 SECTION 9.07. Severability. 

Any provision of any Loan Document held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to such
jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability without affecting the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions of such Loan Document; and the invalidity of a particular provision
in a particular jurisdiction shall not invalidate such provision in any other jurisdiction. 
 SECTION 9.08. Right of
Setoff. 
 If an Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing, each Lender and each of its Affiliates is
hereby authorized at any time and from time to time, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to set off and apply any and all deposits (general or special, time or demand, provisional or final) at any time held and other obligations at any time
owing by such Lender or Affiliate to or for the credit or the account of the Borrower against any of and all the obligations of the Borrower now or hereafter existing under this Agreement held by such Lender, irrespective of whether or not such
Lender shall have made 

  
 75 








 
any demand under this Agreement and although such obligations may be unmatured or denominated in a currency different from that of the applicable deposit or other obligations. The rights of each
Lender under this Section are in addition to other rights and remedies (including other rights of setoff) which such Lender may have. 

SECTION 9.09. Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Consent to Service of Process. 

(a) This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the law of the State of New York. 

(b) Each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally (a) submits, for itself and its property, to the
exclusive jurisdiction of any New York State court or Federal court of the United States of America sitting in the County of New York, and any appellate court from any thereof, in any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to any Loan
Document, or the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby, or for recognition or enforcement of any judgment, and each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally agrees that all claims in respect of any such action or proceeding
shall be heard and determined in such courts located within the County of New York; provided, however, that the Administrative Agent and the Lenders shall be entitled to assert jurisdiction over the Borrower and its property in any
court in which jurisdiction may be laid over the Borrower or its property. Each of the parties hereto agrees that a final judgment in any such action or proceeding shall be conclusive and may be enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the
judgment or in any other manner provided by law. Nothing in this Agreement or any other Loan Document shall affect any right that the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank or any Lender may otherwise have to bring any action or proceeding relating
to this Agreement or any other Loan Document against the Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries or its or their respective properties in the courts of any jurisdiction. 

(c) The Borrower hereby irrevocably and unconditionally waives, to the fullest extent it may legally and effectively do so,
any objection which it may now or hereafter have to the laying of venue of any suit, action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement or any other Loan Document in any court referred to in Section 9.09(b). Each of the parties
hereto hereby irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the defense of an inconvenient forum to the maintenance of such action or proceeding in any such court. 

(d) Each party to this Agreement irrevocably consents to service of process in the manner provided for notices in
Section 9.01. Nothing in this Agreement or any other Loan Document will affect the right of any party hereto or thereto to serve process in any other manner permitted by law. 

SECTION 9.10. WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL. 

EACH PARTY HERETO HEREBY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY
IN ANY LEGAL PROCEEDING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, ANY OTHER LOAN DOCUMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY OR THEREBY (WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT OR ANY OTHER THEORY). EACH PARTY HERETO
(A) CERTIFIES THAT NO REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR ATTORNEY OF ANY OTHER PARTY HAS REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY OR OTHERWISE, THAT SUCH OTHER PARTY WOULD NOT, IN THE EVENT OF LITIGATION, SEEK TO ENFORCE THE FOREGOING WAIVER AND (B) ACKNOWLEDGES THAT
IT AND THE OTHER PARTIES HERETO HAVE BEEN INDUCED TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT BY, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE MUTUAL WAIVERS AND CERTIFICATIONS IN THIS SECTION 9.10. 

  
 76 








 SECTION 9.11. Headings. 

Article and Section headings and the Table of Contents used herein are for convenience of reference only, are not part of this
Agreement and shall not affect the construction of, or be taken into consideration in interpreting, this Agreement. 

SECTION 9.12. Confidentiality. 

(a) Each of the Administrative Agent, the Issuing Banks and the Lenders agrees to maintain the confidentiality of the
Information (as defined below), except that Information may be disclosed (i) to its and its Affiliates’ directors, officers, employees and agents, including accountants, legal counsel and other advisors solely on a need-to-know basis in
connection with the Revolving Credit Facility and the transactions contemplated hereby (it being understood that the Persons to whom such disclosure is made will be informed of the confidential nature of such Information and instructed to keep such
Information confidential), for whom the applicable Administrative Agent, the Issuing Bank or the Lender shall be responsible for any breach by any such Person to whom such disclosure is made of this confidentiality undertaking, (ii) to the
extent requested by any regulatory authority, (iii) to the extent required by applicable laws or regulations or by any subpoena or similar legal process, (iv) to any other party to this Agreement, (v) in connection with the exercise
of any remedies hereunder or any suit, action or proceeding relating to this Agreement or any other Loan Document or the enforcement of rights hereunder or thereunder, (vi) subject to an agreement containing provisions substantially the same as
those of this Section 9.12, to (A) any assignee of or Participant in, or any prospective assignee of or Participant in, any of its rights or obligations under this Agreement or (B) any actual or prospective counterparty (or its
advisors) to any swap or derivative transaction relating to the Borrower and its obligations, (vii) with the written consent of the Borrower or (viii) to the extent such Information (A) becomes publicly available other than as a
result of a breach of this Section 9.12 or (B) becomes available to the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank or any Lender on a nonconfidential basis from a source other than the Borrower. For the purposes of this Section 9.12,
“Information” means all information received from or on behalf of the Borrower (including, without limitation, any information received from representatives of the Borrower) relating to the Borrower, any Subsidiary thereof, or the
business of the Borrower or any Subsidiary thereof, other than any such information that is available to the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank or any Lender on a nonconfidential basis prior to disclosure by the Borrower or such Subsidiary. Any
Person required to maintain the confidentiality of Information as provided in this Section shall be considered to have complied with its obligation to do so if such Person has exercised the same degree of care to maintain the confidentiality of such
Information as such Person would accord to its own confidential information. Unless specifically prohibited by applicable law or court order, each of the Lenders and the Administrative Agent shall, prior to disclosure thereof, make reasonable
efforts to notify the Borrower of any request for disclosure of any such non-public information by any governmental agency or representative thereof (other than any such request in connection with an examination of the financial condition of such
Lender by such governmental agency) or pursuant to legal process. In addition, the Administrative Agent and each Joint Lead Arranger, Documentation Agent and Lender may disclose the existence of this Agreement and the publicly available information
about this Agreement to market data collectors, similar services providers to the lending industry, and service providers to the Administrative Agent and the Lenders in connection with the administration and management of this Agreement and the
other Loan Documents. 
 (b) EACH LENDER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT INFORMATION AS DEFINED IN SECTION 9.12(a) FURNISHED TO IT
PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT MAY INCLUDE MATERIAL NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION CONCERNING THE BORROWER AND ITS RELATED PARTIES OR THEIR RESPECTIVE SECURITIES, AND CONFIRMS THAT IT HAS DEVELOPED COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES REGARDING THE USE OF MATERIAL
NON-

  
 77 








 
PUBLIC INFORMATION AND THAT IT WILL HANDLE SUCH MATERIAL NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THOSE PROCEDURES AND APPLICABLE LAW, INCLUDING FEDERAL AND STATE SECURITIES LAWS. 

(c) ALL INFORMATION, INCLUDING REQUESTS FOR WAIVERS AND AMENDMENTS, FURNISHED BY THE BORROWER OR THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
PURSUANT TO, OR IN THE COURSE OF ADMINISTERING, THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY OTHER LOAN DOCUMENT WILL BE SYNDICATE-LEVEL INFORMATION, WHICH MAY CONTAIN MATERIAL NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE BORROWER, ITS SUBSIDIARIES AND THEIR RELATED PARTIES OR THEIR
RESPECTIVE SECURITIES. ACCORDINGLY, EACH LENDER REPRESENTS TO THE BORROWER AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT THAT IT HAS IDENTIFIED IN ITS ADMINISTRATIVE QUESTIONNAIRE A CREDIT CONTACT WHO MAY RECEIVE INFORMATION THAT MAY CONTAIN MATERIAL NON-PUBLIC
INFORMATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ITS COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES AND APPLICABLE LAW. 
 SECTION 9.13. Interest Rate
Limitation. 
 Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if at any time the interest rate applicable to any Loan,
together with all fees, charges and other amounts which are treated as interest on such Loan under applicable law (collectively the “Charges”), shall exceed the maximum lawful rate (the “Maximum Rate”) which may be
contracted for, charged, taken, received or reserved by the Lender holding such Loan in accordance with applicable law, the rate of interest payable in respect of such Loan hereunder, together with all Charges payable in respect thereof, shall be
limited to the Maximum Rate and, to the extent lawful, the interest and Charges that would have been payable in respect of such Loan but were not payable as a result of the operation of this Section shall be cumulated and the interest and Charges
payable to such Lender in respect of other Loans or periods shall be increased (but not above the Maximum Rate therefor) until such cumulated amount, together with interest thereon at the Federal Funds Effective Rate to the date of repayment, shall
have been received by such Lender. 
 SECTION 9.14. USA PATRIOT Act. 

Each Lender subject to the USA PATRIOT ACT (Title III of Pub. Law 107-56 (signed into law October 26, 2001)) (as amended
from time to time, the “PATRIOT Act”) hereby notifies the Borrower that pursuant to the requirements of the PATRIOT Act, it is required to obtain, verify and record information that identifies the Borrower and any other obligor
under this Agreement and any related Loan Documents and other information that will allow such Lender to identify the Borrower and any other obligor in accordance with the PATRIOT Act. This notice is given in accordance with the requirements of the
PATRIOT Act and is effective as to the Administrative Agent and each Lender. The Borrower hereby acknowledges and agrees that the Administrative Agent shall be permitted to share any or all such information with the Lenders. 

SECTION 9.15. No Fiduciary Duty. 

The Administrative Agent, each Lead Agent, each Lender and their Affiliates (collectively, solely for purposes of this
Section 9.15, the “Lenders”), may have economic interests that conflict with those of the Borrower, its shareholders and/or its affiliates. The Borrower agrees that nothing in the Loan Documents or otherwise will be deemed to create
an advisory, fiduciary or agency relationship or fiduciary or other implied duty between any Lender, on the one hand, and the Borrower, its shareholders or its affiliates, on the other. The Loan Parties acknowledge and agree that (i) the
transactions contemplated by the Loan Documents (including the exercise of rights and remedies 

  
 78 








 
hereunder and thereunder) are arm’s-length commercial transactions between the Lenders, on the one hand, and the Borrower, on the other, and (ii) in connection therewith and with the
process leading thereto, (x) no Lender has assumed an advisory or fiduciary responsibility in favor of the Borrower, its shareholders or its affiliates with respect to the transactions contemplated hereby (or the exercise of rights or remedies
with respect thereto) or the process leading thereto (irrespective of whether any Lender has advised, is currently advising or will advise the Borrower, its shareholders or its affiliates on other matters) or any other obligation to the Borrower
except the obligations expressly set forth in the Loan Documents and (y) each Lender is acting solely as principal and not as the agent or fiduciary of the Borrower, its management, shareholders, creditors or any other Person. The Borrower
acknowledges and agrees that the Borrower has consulted its own legal and financial advisors to the extent it deemed appropriate and that it is responsible for making its own independent judgment with respect to such transactions and the process
leading thereto. The Borrower agrees that it will not claim that any Lender has rendered advisory services of any nature or respect, or owes a fiduciary or similar duty to the Borrower, in connection with such transaction or the process leading
thereto. 
 SECTION 9.16. Judgment Currency. 

If, for the purposes of obtaining judgment in any court, it is necessary to convert a sum due hereunder or any other Loan
Document in one currency into another currency, the rate of exchange used shall be that at which in accordance with normal banking procedures the Administrative Agent could purchase the first currency with such other currency on the Business Day
preceding that on which final judgment is given. The obligation of the Borrower in respect of any such sum due from it to the Administrative Agent or the Lenders hereunder or under the other Loan Documents shall, notwithstanding any judgment in a
currency (the “Judgment Currency”) other than that in which such sum is denominated in accordance with the applicable provisions of this Agreement (the “Agreement Currency”), be discharged only to the extent that on
the Business Day following receipt by the Administrative Agent of any sum adjudged to be so due in the Judgment Currency, the Administrative Agent may in accordance with normal banking procedures purchase the Agreement Currency with the Judgment
Currency. If the amount of the Agreement Currency so purchased is less than the sum originally due to the Administrative Agent from the Borrower in the Agreement Currency, the Borrower agrees, as a separate obligation and notwithstanding any such
judgment, to indemnify the Administrative Agent or the Person to whom such obligation was owing against such loss. If the amount of the Agreement Currency so purchased is greater than the sum originally due to the Administrative Agent in such
currency, the Administrative Agent agrees to return the amount of any excess to the Borrower (or to any other Person who may be entitled thereto under applicable law). 

SECTION 9.17. Release of Subsidiary Guarantors from Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement. 

(a) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or in any other Loan Document, the Administrative Agent is
hereby irrevocably authorized by each Lender (without requirement of notice to or consent of any Lender except as expressly required by Section 9.02) to take any action requested by the Borrower having the effect of releasing the guarantee
obligations of any Subsidiary under the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement (i) if such Person ceases to be a Subsidiary as a result of a transaction permitted by this Agreement or that has been consented to in accordance with Section 9.02,
(ii) if such Subsidiary ceases to be a Material Subsidiary in accordance with the requirements of the definition of “Material Subsidiary” (including as a result of a designation pursuant to the second proviso appearing in the first
sentence of such definition) or (iii) under the circumstances described in Section 9.17(b) below; provided, except in the case of preceding clause (iii), that (x) no such release shall occur if such Subsidiary continues to be a
guarantor in respect of any Indebtedness of the Borrower or any other Subsidiary in an aggregate principal amount equal to or greater than $50,000,000, unless and until such Subsidiary is (or is being simultaneously) released from its guarantee with
respect to such Indebtedness and (y) no such release shall occur if a Default has then occurred and is continuing. 

  
 79 








 (b) At such time as (i) the Loans and all Obligations of the type described
in clause (a) of the definition thereof shall have been paid in full, (ii) all Designated Swap Obligations then due and payable (or which will be due and payable following notice or expiration of any grace period) shall have been paid in
full in cash or made subject to other arrangements satisfactory to such holder (or such holder shall have otherwise consented in writing to the release of the Subsidiary Guarantors from their obligations under the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement),
(iii) the Commitments have been terminated and (iv) all Letters of Credit shall be terminated (or cash collateralized or backstopped in a manner satisfactory to each Issuing Bank), the Subsidiary Guarantors shall be released from their
obligations under the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement, all without delivery of any instrument or performance of any act by any Person. 

(c) Upon request by the Administrative Agent at any time, the Required Lenders will confirm in writing the Administrative
Agent’s authority to release any Subsidiary Guarantor from its obligations under the Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement pursuant to this Section 9.17. 

(d) Notwithstanding the foregoing, any release of Subsidiary Guarantors effected in the manner permitted by the foregoing
provisions of this Section 9.17 shall not require the consent of any Designated Swap Bank. 
 [Remainder of page intentionally blank;
next page is signature page] 

  
 80 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly
executed by their respective authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC., as the Borrower
		
	By	 	/s/ Daniel Fawley
		 	Name: Daniel A. Fawley
		 	Title: SVP and Treasurer



  
 (Signature Page
– Reynolds American Inc.- Revolving Credit Agreement) 








 
			
	JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., individually and as Administrative Agent, an Issuing Bank and Swingline Lender
		
	By	 	/s/ Tony Yung
		 	Name:
		 	Title:



  
 (Signature Page
– Reynolds American Inc.- Revolving Credit Agreement) 








 
			
	CITIBANK, N.A., individually and as Swingline Lender
		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael Vondriska
		 	Name: Michael Vondriska
		 	Title: Vice President



  
 (Signature Page
– Reynolds American Inc.- Revolving Credit Agreement) 








 
			
	CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH,
		
	By:	 	/s/ Robert Hetu
		 	Name: Robert Hetu
		 	Title: Authorized Signatory
		
	By:	 	/s/ Patrick Freytag
		 	Name: Patrick Freytag
		 	Title: Authorized Signatory



  
 (Signature Page
– Reynolds American Inc.- Revolving Credit Agreement) 








 
			
	FIFTH THIRD BANK
		
	By:	 	/s/ Mary Ramsey
		 	Name: Mary Ramsey
		 	Title: Vice President



  
 (Signature Page
– Reynolds American Inc.- Revolving Credit Agreement) 








 
			
	GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA
		
	By:	 	/s/ Mark Walton
		 	Name: Mark Walton
		 	Title: Authorized Signatory



  
 (Signature Page
– Reynolds American Inc.- Revolving Credit Agreement) 








 
			
	MIZUHO BANK, LTD.
		
	By:	 	/s/ James R. Fayen
		 	Name: James R. Fayen
		 	Title: Deputy General Manager



  
 (Signature Page
– Reynolds American Inc.- Revolving Credit Agreement) 








 
			
	ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
		
	By:	 	/s/ David Cole
		 	Name: David Cole
		 	Title: Authorized Signatory



  
 (Signature Page
– Reynolds American Inc.- Revolving Credit Agreement) 








 
			
	SCOTIABANC INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ J.F. Todd
		 	Name: J.F. Todd
		 	Title: Managing Director



  
 (Signature Page
– Reynolds American Inc.- Revolving Credit Agreement) 








 
			
	THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
		
	By:	 	/s/ David Mahmood
		 	Name: David Mahmood
		 	Title: Managing Director



  
 (Signature Page
– Reynolds American Inc.- Revolving Credit Agreement) 








 
			
	WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Andrea S Chen
		 	Name: Andrea S Chen
		 	Title: Director



  
 (Signature Page
– Reynolds American Inc.- Revolving Credit Agreement) 








 
			
	AGFIRST FARM CREDIT BANK
		
	By:	 	/s/ Bruce B Fortner
		 	Name: Bruce B Fortner
		 	Title: Vice President



  
 (Signature Page
– Reynolds American Inc.- Revolving Credit Agreement) 








 
			
	FARM CREDIT BANK OF TEXAS
		
	By:	 	/s/ Alan Robinson
		 	Name: Alan Robinson
		 	Title: Vice President



  
 (Signature Page
– Reynolds American Inc.- Revolving Credit Agreement) 








 
			
	THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
		
	By:	 	/s/ Jeffrey Dears
		 	Name: Jeffrey Dears
		 	Title: Vice President



  
 (Signature Page
– Reynolds American Inc.- Revolving Credit Agreement) 








 
			
	NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY
		
	By:	 	/s/ John C. Canty
		 	Name: John C. Canty
		 	Title: Senior Vice President



  
 (Signature Page
– Reynolds American Inc.- Revolving Credit Agreement) 








 
			
	PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Jessica Fabrizi Sidhom
		 	Name: Jessica Fabrizi Sidhom
		 	Title: VP



  
 (Signature Page
– Reynolds American Inc.- Revolving Credit Agreement) 








 
			
	 UNITED FCS, PCA,
 d/b/a FCS
COMMERCIAL FINANCE GROUP

		
	By:	 	/s/ Daniel J. Best
		 	Name: Daniel J. Best
		 	Title: Vice President



  
 (Signature Page
– Reynolds American Inc.- Revolving Credit Agreement) 








 [W&C (New York) Draft: September 25, 2013] 

Schedule 2.01 
 Commitments

  

					
	 Lender
	  	Allocate	 
	 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
	  	$	112,000,000	  
	 Citibank, N.A.
	  	$	112,000,000	  
	 Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch
	  	$	112,000,000	  
	 Fifth Third Bank
	  	$	112,000,000	  
	 Goldman Sachs Bank USA
	  	$	112,000,000	  
	 Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
	  	$	112,000,000	  
	 Royal Bank of Canada
	  	$	112,000,000	  
	 Scotiabanc Inc.
	  	$	56,000,000	  
	 The Bank of Nova Scotia
	  	$	56,000,000	  
	 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
	  	$	89,000,000	  
	 AgFirst Farm Credit Bank
	  	$	75,000,000	  
	 Farm Credit Bank of Texas
	  	$	75,000,000	  
	 The Bank of New York Mellon
	  	$	65,000,000	  
	 Northern Trust Company
	  	$	50,000,000	  
	 PNC Bank, National Association
	  	$	50,000,000	  
	 United FCS, PCA
	  	$	50,000,000	  
		  	  
	  
	 
	 Total
	  	$	1,350,000,000	  
		  	  
	  
	 








 Schedule 2.05 

Existing Letters of Credit 
 See attached
description. 







 STANDBY LETTERS OF CREDIT 

(As of 10/08/13) 
 BANK OF NEW YORK
MELLON 
  

																																							
	 	 	—Fees in Basis Points Pd Qtrly on 3rd business day of Jan, Apr, Jul, Oct—	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 Beneficiary
	 	BCA	 	 	Issuing/
Facing	 	 	Total	 	 	Original
Issue Date	 	 	Renewal Date	 	 	Expiry	 	 	Original
Issue Amount	 	 	Amount O/S
(As of 10/08/13)	 	 	L/C No.	 	 	Company
	 Old Republic Insurance Co
	 	 	170	  	 	 	25	  	 	 	195	  	 	 	8/9/2002	  	 	 	8/12/2013	  	 	 	8/12/2014	  	 	$	100,000.00	  	 	$	100,000.00	  	 	 	53822	  	 	RJRH
	 Zurich American Insurance
	 	 	170	  	 	 	25	  	 	 	195	  	 	 	1/12/2004	  	 	 	1/12/2013	  	 	 	1/12/2014	  	 	$	1,300,000.00	  	 	$	1,300,000.00	  	 	 	53824	  	 	RJRT
	 ACE American Insurance Co.
	 	 	170	  	 	 	25	  	 	 	195	  	 	 	6/14/2003	  	 	 	6/14/2013	  	 	 	6/14/2014	  	 	$	3,320,200.00	  	 	$	4,879,181.00	  	 	 	53823	  	 	RAI
		 				 				 				 				 				 				 	 	Total	  	 	$	6,279,181.00	  	 				 	
					
	 TOTAL LETTER OF CREDIT EXPOSURE INSIDE THE BCA:
	   
	 				 	$	6,279,181.00	  	 				 	
								
	 BCA COMMITMENT FEES
	   
	 	 	30	  	 				 				 				 				 	$	743,720,819.00	  	 	 	unutilized amount
	 Total Reynolds American Credit Agreement dated 7/29/11
	   
	 				 				 	$	750,000,000.00	  	 				 	








 Schedule 3.06 

Disclosed Matters 
 See attached
description. 







 Tobacco Litigation — General 

Introduction 
 Various
legal proceedings or claims, including litigation claiming that cancer and other diseases, as well as addiction, have resulted from the use of, or exposure to, RAI’s operating subsidiaries’ products, are pending or may be instituted
against RJR Tobacco, American Snuff Co. or their affiliates, including RAI and RJR, or indemnitees, including B&W. These pending legal proceedings include claims relating to cigarette products manufactured by RJR Tobacco or certain of its
affiliates and indemnitees, as well as claims relating to smokeless tobacco products manufactured by American Snuff Co. A discussion of the legal proceedings relating to cigarette products is set forth below under the heading
“— Litigation Affecting the Cigarette Industry.” All of the references under that heading to tobacco-related litigation, smoking and health litigation and other similar references are references to legal proceedings relating to
cigarette products and are not references to legal proceedings involving smokeless tobacco products, and case numbers under that heading include only cases involving cigarette products. The legal proceedings relating to the smokeless tobacco
products manufactured by American Snuff Co. are discussed separately under the heading “— Smokeless Tobacco Litigation” below. 

In connection with the B&W business combination, RJR Tobacco has agreed to indemnify B&W and its affiliates, including
its indirect parent, BAT, against certain liabilities, costs and expenses incurred by B&W or its affiliates arising out of the U.S. cigarette and tobacco business of B&W. As a result of this indemnity, RJR Tobacco has assumed the
defense of pending B&W-specific tobacco-related litigation, has paid the judgments and costs related to certain pre-business combination tobacco-related litigation of B&W, and has posted bonds on behalf of B&W, where necessary, in
connection with cases decided since the B&W business combination. 
 Certain Terms and Phrases 

Certain terms and phrases used in this disclosure may require some explanation. The term “judgment” or “final
judgment” refers to the final decision of the court resolving the dispute and determining the rights and obligations of the parties. At the trial court level, for example, a final judgment generally is entered by the court after a jury verdict
and after post-verdict motions have been decided. In most cases, the losing party can appeal a verdict only after a final judgment has been entered by the trial court. 

The term “damages” refers to the amount of money sought by a plaintiff in a complaint, or awarded to a party by a
jury or, in some cases, by a judge. “Compensatory damages” are awarded to compensate the prevailing party for actual losses suffered, if liability is proved. In cases in which there is a finding that a defendant has acted willfully,
maliciously or fraudulently, generally based on a higher burden of proof than is required for a finding of liability for compensatory damages, a plaintiff also may be awarded “punitive damages.” Although damages may be awarded at the trial
court stage, a losing party generally may be protected from paying any damages until all appellate avenues have been exhausted by posting a supersedeas bond. The amount of such a bond is governed by the law of the relevant jurisdiction and generally
is set at the amount of damages plus some measure of statutory interest, modified at the discretion of the appropriate court or subject to limits set by court or statute. 

The term “per curiam” refers to an opinion entered by a court. In most cases, it is used to indicate that the
opinion entered is a brief announcement of the court’s decision and is not accompanied by a written opinion. 
 The
term “settlement” refers to certain types of cases in which cigarette manufacturers, including RJR Tobacco and B&W, have agreed to resolve disputes with certain plaintiffs without resolving the case through trial. The principal terms
of certain settlements entered into by RJR Tobacco and B&W are explained below under “— Accounting for Tobacco-Related Litigation Contingencies.” 

Theories of Recovery 
 The
plaintiffs seek recovery on a variety of legal theories, including negligence, strict liability in tort, design defect, special duty, voluntary undertaking, breach of warranty, failure to warn, fraud, misrepresentation, unfair trade practices,
conspiracy, unjust enrichment, medical monitoring, public nuisance and violations of state and federal antitrust laws. In certain of these cases, the plaintiffs claim that cigarette smoking exacerbated injuries caused by exposure to asbestos. 

  
 1 








 The plaintiffs seek various forms of relief, including compensatory and punitive
damages, treble or multiple damages and statutory damages and penalties, creation of medical monitoring and smoking cessation funds, disgorgement of profits, and injunctive and other equitable relief. Although alleged damages often are not
determinable from a complaint, and the law governing the pleading and calculation of damages varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, compensatory and punitive damages have been specifically pleaded in a number of cases, sometimes in amounts
ranging into the hundreds of millions and even billions of dollars. 
 Defenses 

The defenses raised by RJR Tobacco, American Snuff Co. and their affiliates and indemnitees include, where applicable and
otherwise appropriate, preemption by the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act of some or all claims arising after 1969, or by the Comprehensive Smokeless Tobacco Health Education Act for claims arising after 1986, the lack of any defect in
the product, assumption of the risk, contributory or comparative fault, lack of proximate cause, remoteness, lack of standing and statutes of limitations or repose. RAI and RJR have asserted additional defenses, including jurisdictional defenses, in
many of the cases in which they are named. 
 Accounting for Tobacco-Related Litigation Contingencies 

In accordance with GAAP, RAI and its subsidiaries, including RJR Tobacco, American Snuff Co. and SFNTC, as applicable, record
any loss concerning litigation at such time as an unfavorable outcome becomes probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated on an individual case-by-case basis. For the reasons set forth below, RAI’s management continues to conclude that
the loss of any particular pending smoking and health tobacco litigation claim against RJR Tobacco or its affiliates or indemnitees, or the loss of any particular claim concerning the use of smokeless tobacco against American Snuff Co., when viewed
on an individual basis, is not probable. 
 RJR Tobacco and its affiliates believe that they have valid defenses to the
smoking and health tobacco litigation claims against them, as well as valid bases for appeal of adverse verdicts against them. RAI, RJR Tobacco and their affiliates and indemnitees have, through their counsel, filed pleadings and memoranda in
pending smoking and health tobacco litigation that set forth and discuss a number of grounds and defenses that they and their counsel believe have a valid basis in law and fact. With the exception of Engle Progeny cases, described below, RJR
Tobacco and its affiliates and indemnitees continue to win the majority of smoking and health tobacco litigation claims that reach trial, and a very high percentage of the tobacco-related litigation claims brought against them continue to be
dismissed at or before trial. Based on their experience in the smoking and health tobacco litigation against them and the strength of the defenses available to them in such litigation, RJR Tobacco and its affiliates believe that their successful
defense of smoking and health tobacco litigation in the past will continue in the future. 
 No liabilities for pending
smoking and health litigation have been recorded in RAI’s condensed consolidated balance sheet (unaudited) as of September 30, 2013. During the third quarter of 2013, a payment of $3.65 million was made in satisfaction of the adverse
judgment in the Clinton case, an individual smoking and health case described below. As other cases proceed through the appellate process, RAI will consider making further accruals on an individual case-by-case basis if an unfavorable outcome
becomes probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. 
 It is the policy of RJR Tobacco and its affiliates to
vigorously defend all tobacco-related litigation claims. Generally, RJR Tobacco and its affiliates and indemnitees have not settled any smoking and health tobacco litigation claims. Other than actions taken pursuant to “offer of judgment”
statutes, as described below in “—Litigation Affecting the Cigarette Industry,” RJR Tobacco and its affiliates do not intend to settle such claims. 

With respect to smoking and health tobacco litigation claims, the only significant settlements reached by RJR Tobacco and
B&W involved: 
  

	 	•	 	 the State Settlement Agreements and the funding by various tobacco companies of a $5.2 billion trust fund contemplated by the MSA to benefit
tobacco growers; and 


  

	 	•	 	 the original Broin flight attendant case discussed below under “— Litigation Affecting the Cigarette Industry —
Broin II Cases.” 



  
 2 








 The circumstances surrounding the State Settlement Agreements and the funding of
a trust fund to benefit the tobacco growers are readily distinguishable from the current categories of smoking and health cases involving RJR Tobacco or its affiliates and indemnitees. The claims underlying the State Settlement Agreements were
brought on behalf of the states to recover funds paid for health care and medical and other assistance to state citizens suffering from diseases and conditions allegedly related to tobacco use. The State Settlement Agreements settled all the
health-care cost recovery actions brought by, or on behalf of, the settling jurisdictions and contain releases of various additional present and future claims. In accordance with the MSA, various tobacco companies agreed to fund a $5.2 billion
trust fund to be used to address the possible adverse economic impact of the MSA on tobacco growers. A discussion of the State Settlement Agreements, and a table depicting the related payment schedule, is set forth below under “—Litigation
Affecting the Cigarette Industry — Health-Care Cost Recovery Cases.” 
 The states were a unique set of
plaintiffs and are not involved in any of the smoking and health cases remaining against RJR Tobacco or its affiliates and indemnitees. Although RJR Tobacco and certain of its affiliates and indemnitees continue to be defendants in health-care cost
recovery cases similar in theory to the state cases but involving other plaintiffs, such as Native American tribes and foreign governments, the vast majority of such cases have been dismissed on legal grounds. RJR Tobacco and its affiliates,
including RAI, believe that the same legal principles that have resulted in dismissal of health-care cost recovery cases either at the trial court level or on appeal should compel dismissal of the similar pending cases. 

As with claims that were resolved by the State Settlement Agreements, the other cases settled by RJR Tobacco can be
distinguished from existing cases pending against RJR Tobacco and its affiliates and indemnitees. The original Broin case, discussed below under “— Litigation Affecting the Cigarette Industry — Broin II
Cases,” was settled in the middle of trial during negotiations concerning a possible nation-wide settlement of claims similar to those underlying the State Settlement Agreements. 

In 2010, RJR Tobacco entered into a comprehensive agreement with the Canadian federal, provincial and territorial governments,
which resolved all civil claims related to the movement of contraband tobacco products in Canada during the period 1985 through 1999 that the Canadian governments could assert against RJR Tobacco and its affiliates. These claims were separate from
any smoking and health tobacco litigation. 
 Likewise, in 2004, RJR Tobacco and B&W separately settled the antitrust
case DeLoach v. Philip Morris Cos., Inc., which was brought by a unique class of plaintiffs: a class of all tobacco growers and tobacco allotment holders. The plaintiffs asserted that the defendants conspired to fix the price of tobacco
leaf and to destroy the federal government’s tobacco quota and price support program. Despite legal defenses they believed to be valid, RJR Tobacco and B&W separately settled this case to avoid a long and contentious trial with the tobacco
growers. The DeLoach case and the antitrust case currently pending against RJR Tobacco and B&W involve different types of plaintiffs and different theories of recovery under the antitrust laws than the smoking and health cases pending
against RJR Tobacco and its affiliates and indemnitees. 
 Finally, as discussed under “— Litigation
Affecting the Cigarette Industry — State Settlement Agreements—Enforcement and Validity; Adjustments,” RJR Tobacco and B&W each has settled certain cases brought by states concerning the enforcement of State Settlement
Agreements. Despite legal defenses believed to be valid, these cases were settled to avoid further contentious litigation with the states involved. These enforcement actions involve alleged breaches of State Settlement Agreements based on specific
actions taken by particular defendants. Accordingly, any future enforcement actions involving State Settlement Agreements will be reviewed by RJR Tobacco on the merits and should not be affected by the settlement of prior enforcement cases. 

American Snuff Co. also believes that it has valid defenses to the smokeless tobacco litigation against it. American Snuff Co.
asserted and will continue to assert some or all of these defenses in each case at the time and in the manner deemed appropriate by American Snuff Co. and its counsel. No verdict or judgment has been returned or entered against American Snuff Co. on
any claim for personal injuries allegedly resulting from the use of smokeless 

  
 3 








 
tobacco. American Snuff Co. intends to defend vigorously all smokeless tobacco litigation claims asserted against it. No liability for pending smokeless tobacco litigation was recorded in
RAI’s condensed consolidated balance sheet (unaudited) as of September 30, 2013. 
 Cautionary Statement 

Even though RAI’s management continues to conclude that the loss of any particular pending smoking and health tobacco
litigation claim against RJR Tobacco or its affiliates or indemnitees, or the loss of any particular case concerning the use of smokeless tobacco against American Snuff Co., when viewed on an individual case-by-case basis, is not probable, the
possibility of material losses related to such litigation is more than remote. Litigation is subject to many uncertainties, and generally, it is not possible to predict the outcome of any particular litigation pending against RJR Tobacco, American
Snuff Co. or their affiliates or indemnitees, or to reasonably estimate the amount or range of any possible loss. 

Although RJR Tobacco believes that it has valid bases for appeals of adverse verdicts in its pending cases, and RJR Tobacco
and RAI believe they have valid defenses to all actions, and intend to defend all actions vigorously, it is possible that there could be further adverse developments in pending cases, and that additional cases could be decided unfavorably against
RAI, RJR Tobacco or their affiliates or indemnitees. Determinations of liability or adverse rulings in such cases or in similar cases involving other cigarette manufacturers as defendants, even if such judgments are not final, could have a material
adverse effect on the litigation against RJR Tobacco or its affiliates or indemnitees and could encourage the commencement of additional tobacco-related litigation. In addition, a number of political, legislative, regulatory and other developments
relating to the tobacco industry and cigarette smoking have received wide media attention. These developments may negatively affect the outcomes of tobacco-related legal actions and encourage the commencement of additional similar litigation. 

Although it is impossible to predict the outcome of such events on pending litigation and the rate new lawsuits are filed
against RJR Tobacco or its affiliates or indemnitees, a significant increase in litigation or in adverse outcomes for tobacco defendants, or difficulties in obtaining the bonding required to stay execution of judgments on appeal, could have a
material adverse effect on any or all of these entities. Moreover, notwithstanding the quality of defenses available to RJR Tobacco and its affiliates and indemnitees in litigation matters, it is possible that RAI’s results of operations, cash
flows or financial position could be materially adversely affected by the ultimate outcome of certain pending litigation matters against RJR Tobacco or its affiliates or indemnitees. 

Similarly, smokeless tobacco litigation is subject to many uncertainties. Notwithstanding the quality of defenses available to
American Snuff Co., it is possible that RAI’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position could be materially adversely affected by the ultimate outcome of certain pending litigation matters against American Snuff Co. 

Litigation Affecting the Cigarette Industry 

Overview 

Introduction. In connection with the B&W business combination, RJR Tobacco agreed to indemnify B&W and its
affiliates against, among other things, certain litigation liabilities, costs and expenses incurred by B&W or its affiliates arising out of the U.S. cigarette and tobacco business of B&W. Accordingly, the cases discussed below include
cases brought solely against RJR Tobacco and its affiliates, including RAI and RJR; cases brought against both RJR Tobacco, its affiliates and B&W; and cases brought solely against B&W and assumed by RJR Tobacco in the B&W business
combination. 
 During the third quarter of 2013, 14 tobacco-related cases, including four Engle Progeny cases, were
served against RJR Tobacco or its affiliates or indemnitees. On September 30, 2013, there were 165 cases pending against RJR Tobacco or its affiliates or indemnitees: 149 in the United States and 16 in Canada, as compared with 153 total cases
on September 30, 2012. The U.S. case number does not include the 30 individual smoker cases pending in West Virginia state court as a consolidated action, 5,187 Engle Progeny cases, involving approximately 6,344


  
 4 








 
individual plaintiffs, and 2,574 Broin II cases (as hereinafter defined), pending in the United States against RJR Tobacco or its affiliates or indemnitees. Of the U.S. cases pending on
September 30, 2013, 17 are pending in federal court, and 131 in state court, primarily in the following states: Florida (27 cases); Maryland (21 cases); Missouri (20 cases); New York (14 cases); Louisiana (9 cases); and California (9 cases).

 The following table lists the categories of the U.S. tobacco-related cases pending against RJR Tobacco or its
affiliates or indemnitees as of September 30, 2013, compared with the number of cases pending against RJR Tobacco, its affiliates or indemnitees as of June 30, 2013, as reported in RAI’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2013, filed with the SEC on July 24, 2013, and a cross-reference to the discussion of each case type. 
  

									
	 Case Type
	  	RJR Tobacco’s
Case Numbers as
of September 30, 2013	  	Change in
Number of
Cases Since
June 30, 2013
Increase/(Decrease)	  	Page
Reference	 
	 Individual Smoking and Health
	  	96	  	4	  	 	10	  
	 West Virginia IPIC (Number of Plaintiffs)*
	  	1 (30)	  	(534)	  	 	11	  
	 Engle Progeny (Number of Plaintiffs)**
	  	5,187 (6,344)	  	(109) (79)	  	 	11	  
	 Broin II
	  	2,574	  	No change	  	 	23	  
	 Class-Action
	  	8	  	No change	  	 	24	  
	 Health-Care Cost Recovery
	  	2	  	No change	  	 	26	  
	 State Settlement Agreements—Enforcement and Validity; Adjustments
	  	31	  	No change	  	 	32	  
	 Antitrust
	  	1	  	No change	  	 	37	  
	 Other Litigation and Developments
	  	10	  	2	  	 	37	  

  

	*	 Includes as one case the 30 cases pending as a consolidated action In Re: Tobacco Litigation Individual Personal Injury Cases, sometimes
referred to as West Virginia IPIC cases, described below. The West Virginia IPIC cases have been separated from the Individual Smoking and Health cases for reporting purposes. 



	**	 The Engle Progeny cases have been separated from the Individual Smoking and Health cases for reporting purposes. The number of cases has
decreased as the result of many of the multiple plaintiff federal court cases either being dismissed or consolidated. 



The following cases against RJR Tobacco and B&W have attracted significant attention: the Florida state court class-action
case, Engle v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and the related Engle Progeny cases; and the case brought by the U.S. Department of Justice under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, referred to as RICO. 

In 2000, a jury in Engle v. Liggett Group, a class-action brought against the major U.S. cigarette manufacturers by
Florida smokers allegedly harmed by their addiction to nicotine, rendered a $145 billion punitive damages verdict in favor of the class. In 2006, the Florida Supreme Court set aside that award, prospectively decertified the class, and preserved
several of the Engle jury findings for use in subsequent individual actions to be filed within one year of its decision. The preserved findings include jury determinations that smoking causes various diseases, that nicotine is addictive, and
that each defendant sold cigarettes that were defective and unreasonably dangerous, committed unspecified acts of negligence and individually and jointly concealed unspecified information about the health risks of smoking. The Engle findings
do not indicate that all cigarettes sold by each defendant were defective and unreasonably dangerous, nor do they specify what acts of negligence each defendant committed, or what information each defendant concealed. 

In the wake of Engle, thousands of individual progeny actions were filed in federal and state courts in Florida. Such
actions are referred to as the Engle Progeny cases. As of September 30, 2013, 1,961 cases were pending in federal court, and 3,226 cases were pending in state court. These cases include approximately 6,344 plaintiffs. In addition, as of
September 30, 2013, RJR Tobacco was aware of 17 additional cases that had been filed but not 

  
 5 








 
served. One hundred and four cases have been tried in Florida state and federal courts since 2010, and numerous state court trials are scheduled for late 2013 and early 2014. The number of
pending cases fluctuates for a variety of reasons, including voluntary and involuntary dismissals. Voluntary dismissals include cases in which a plaintiff accepts an “offer of judgment,” referred to in Florida statutes as “proposals
for settlement,” from RJR Tobacco and/or its affiliates. An offer of judgment, if rejected by the plaintiff, preserves RJR Tobacco’s right to recover attorneys’ fees under Florida law in the event of a favorable verdict and is
sometimes made through court-ordered mediations. 
 In each Engle Progeny case, a central issue is the proper use of
the preserved Engle findings. Plaintiffs contend that the Engle findings establish the conduct elements of their claims (sale of a defective product, negligent breach of duty, or intentional concealment of material information) even
absent any inquiry into whether the findings are relevant to the individual claims of the progeny plaintiff. RJR Tobacco and other Engle defendants contend that such use of the Engle findings would violate federal due process. In 2010,
in Brown v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, referred to as the Eleventh Circuit, indicated some support for the defendants’ argument that the Engle findings are fatally
ambiguous. However, on March 14, 2013, the Florida Supreme Court rejected the due-process argument in Douglas v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., and, on August 9, 2013, the Eleventh Circuit, in Walker v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco
Company, held that it was bound to defer to the Douglas decision under the Full Faith and Credit Act. On October 7, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the decision in Douglas, and RJR Tobacco sought further review
of the Walker decision by filing a petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc in the Eleventh Circuit. 

Eleven cases have become final before the Engle defendants could obtain review of their due process argument. These
cases resulted in aggregate payments by RJR Tobacco of $107.1 million ($80.7 million for compensatory and punitive damages and $26.5 million for attorneys’ fees and statutory interest). 

The following chart reflects verdicts in individual Engle Progeny cases, pending as of September 30, 2013, in
which a verdict has been returned against RJR Tobacco or B&W, or both. No liability for any of these cases has been recorded in RAI’s condensed consolidated balance sheet (unaudited) as of September 30, 2013. This chart does not
include the mistrials or verdicts returned in favor of RJR Tobacco or B&W, or both. 
  

															
	 Plaintiff Case
Name
	  	RJR Tobacco
Allocation of
Fault	 	 	Compensatory
Damages (as
adjusted)(1)	 	 	Punitive
Damages	 	  	 Appeal Status

	 Sherman
	  	 	50	% 	 	$	775,000	  	 	$	—  	  	  	Florida Supreme Court granted review; decision pending
	 Jimmie Lee Brown
	  	 	50	% 	 	 	600,000	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Florida Supreme Court granted review; decision pending
	 Douglas
	  	 	5	% 	 	 	250,000	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Petition for certiorari denied by U.S. Supreme Court
	 Cohen
	  	 	33.3	% 	 	 	3,300,000	  	 	 	10,000,000	  	  	Notice to invoke jurisdiction of Florida Supreme Court pending
	 Townsend
	  	 	51	% 	 	 	5,500,000	  	 	 	20,000,000	  	  	Notice to invoke jurisdiction of Florida Supreme Court pending
	 Putney
	  	 	30	% 	 	 	4,500,000	  	 	 	2,500,000	  	  	Notice to invoke jurisdiction of Florida Supreme Court pending
	 Buonomo
	  	 	77.5	% 	 	 	4,060,000	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Punitive damages set aside; remanded for new trial
	 Koballa
	  	 	30	% 	 	 	300,000	(2) 	 	 	—  	  	  	Notice to invoke jurisdiction of Florida Supreme Court pending
	 Webb
	  	 	90	% 	 	 	3,600,000	  	 	 	25,000,000	  	  	Remittitur entered; pending – First DCA
	 Kirkland
	  	 	10	% 	 	 	10,000	  	 	 	250,000	  	  	Pending – Second DCA
	 Mack
	  	 	65	% 	 	 	1,885,000	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Pending – First DCA
	 Soffer
	  	 	40	% 	 	 	2,000,000	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Notice to invoke jurisdiction of Florida Supreme Court pending
	 Ciccone
	  	 	30	% 	 	 	1,000,000	  	 				  	Punitive damages reversed


  
 6 









															
	 Sury
	  	 	20	% 	 	 	1,000,000	(4) 	 	 	—  	  	  	Notice to invoke jurisdiction of Florida Supreme Court pending
	 Hallgren
	  	 	25	% 	 	 	1,000,000	(5) 	 	 	750,000	  	  	Pending – Second DCA
	 Ward
	  	 	30	% 	 	 	487,000	(6) 	 	 	1,700,000	  	  	First DCA affirmed, per curiam
	 Emmon Smith
	  	 	70	% 	 	 	7,000,000	  	 	 	20,000,000	  	  	Pending – First DCA
	 Duke
	  	 	25	% 	 	 	7,700	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Eleventh Circuit affirmed
	 Calloway
	  	 	27	% 	 	 	16,100,000	(7) 	 	 	17,250,000	  	  	Pending – Fourth DCA
	 Walker
	  	 	10	% 	 	 	27,500	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Eleventh Circuit affirmed
	 Hiott
	  	 	40	% 	 	 	730,000	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Pending – First DCA
	 Hancock
	  	 	5	% 	 	 	700	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Pending – Fourth DCA
	 Sikes
	  	 	51	% 	 	 	3,520,000	  	 	 	2,000,000	  	  	Pending – First DCA
	 James Smith
	  	 	55	% 	 	 	600,000	(8) 	 	 	20,000	  	  	Pending – Eleventh Circuit
	 Schlenther
	  	 	50	% 	 	 	2,500,000	  	 	 	—  	  	  	New trial on punitive damages only; pending – Second DCA
	 Ballard
	  	 	55	% 	 	 	5,000,000	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Post-trial motions denied
	 Lock
	  	 	9	% 	 	 	103,500	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Pending – Second DCA
	 Williams
	  	 	85	% 	 	 	4,250,000	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Pending – Third DCA
	 Evers
	  	 	60	% 	 	 	1,938,000	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Punitive damages reversed; pending – Second DCA
	 Schoeff
	  	 	75	% 	 	 	7,875,000	  	 	 	30,000,000	  	  	Pending – Fourth DCA
	 Marotta
	  	 	58	% 	 	 	3,480,000	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Pending – Fourth DCA
	 Searcy
	  	 	30	% 	 	 	1,000,000	(9) 	 	 	1,670,000	  	  	Remittitur granted
	 Aycock
	  	 	72.5	% 	 	 	4,277,000	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Pending – Eleventh Circuit
	 Earl Graham
	  	 	20	% 	 	 	550,000	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Post-trial motions denied
	 Starr-Blundell
	  	 	10	% 	 	 	50,000	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Post-trial motions pending(3)
	 Odum
	  	 	50	% 	 	 	100,000	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Post-trial motions pending(3)
	 Skolnick
	  	 	30	% 	 	 	767,000	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Post-trial motions pending(3)
	 Thibault
	  	 	70	% 	 	 	1,750,000	(8) 	 	 	1,275,000	  	  	Pending – First DCA
	 Grossman
	  	 	75	% 	 	 	15,350,000	(8) 	 	 	22,500,000	  	  	Post-trial motions denied
	 Gafney
	  	 	33	% 	 	 	1,914,000	  	 	 	—  	  	  	Post-trial motions pending(3)
	 Crawford
	  	 	70	% 	 	 	6,300,000	  	 	 	1,000,000	  	  	Final judgment has not been entered
		  				 	  
	  
	 	 	  
	  
	 	  	
	 Totals
	  				 	$	115,457,400	  	 	$	155,915,000	  	  	
		  				 	  
	  
	 	 	  
	  
	 	  	

  

	(1) 	 Unless otherwise noted, compensatory damages in these cases are adjusted to reflect the jury’s allocation of comparative fault. Punitive
damages are not so adjusted. The amounts listed above do not include attorneys’ fees or statutory interest that may apply to the judgments. 



	(2) 	 The court in Koballa found RJR Tobacco not liable for the plaintiff’s injuries, but awarded compensatory damages. For a detailed
description of the case, see “— Engle and Engle Progeny Cases” below. 



	(3) 	 Should the pending post-trial motions be denied, RJR Tobacco will file a notice of appeal with the appropriate appellate court.




	(4) 	 The trial court held the defendants jointly and severally liable for the entire $1 million, even though the jury had allocated 60% of fault to the
plaintiff and 20% of fault to a co-defendant. 



	(5) 	 The trial court held the defendants jointly and severally liable, even though the jury allocated 50% of fault to the plaintiff and 25% to the
co-defendant. 



	(6) 	 The trial court held the defendants jointly and severally liable, even though the jury allocated 50% of fault to the plaintiff and 20% to the
co-defendants. 



	(7) 	 In its ruling on the post-trial motions, the court determined that the jury’s apportionment of comparative fault did not apply to the
compensatory damages award and found the defendants jointly and severally liable. 



	(8) 	 The court did not apply comparative fault in the final judgment. 



	(9) 	 The court held the defendants jointly and severally liable, even though the jury allocated 40% of fault to the plaintiff and 30% to the
co-defendant. 



  
 7 








 As of September 30, 2013, outstanding jury verdicts in favor of the
Engle Progeny plaintiffs had been entered against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $115,457,400 in compensatory damages (as adjusted) and in the amount of $155,915,000 in punitive damages, for a total of $271,372,400. All of these verdicts are at
various stages in the appellate process. RJR Tobacco continues to believe that it has valid defenses in these cases, including case-specific issues beyond the due process issue discussed above. It is the policy of RJR Tobacco and its affiliates to
vigorously defend all smoking and health claims, including in Engle Progeny cases. 
 Should RJR Tobacco not prevail
in any particular individual Engle Progeny case or determine that in any individual Engle Progeny case an unfavorable outcome has become probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, a loss would be recognized, which could have
a material adverse effect on earnings and cash flows of RAI in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year. This position on loss recognition for Engle Progeny cases as of September 30, 2013, is consistent with RAI’s and RJR
Tobacco’s historic position on loss recognition for other smoking and health litigation claims. It is also the policy of RJR Tobacco to record any loss concerning litigation at such time as an unfavorable outcome becomes probable and the amount
can be reasonably estimated on an individual case-by-case basis. 
 In the U.S. Department of Justice case,
brought in 1999 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the government sought, among other forms of relief, the disgorgement of profits pursuant to the civil provisions of RICO. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia ruled in 2005 that disgorgement is not an available remedy in the case. The bench trial ended in June 2005, and the court, in August 2006, issued its ruling, among other things, finding certain defendants, including RJR Tobacco and
B&W, liable for the RICO claims, imposing no direct financial penalties on the defendants, but ordering the defendants to make certain “corrective communications” in a variety of media and enjoining the defendants from using certain
brand descriptors. Both sides appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. In May 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals largely affirmed the findings against the tobacco company defendants and remanded to the trial
court for further proceedings. The U.S. Supreme Court denied the parties’ petitions for writ of certiorari in June 2010. Post-remand proceedings are underway to determine the extent to which the original order will be implemented. 

For a detailed description of these cases, see “— Engle and Engle Progeny Cases” and
“— Health-Care Cost Recovery Cases — U.S. Department of Justice Case” below. 
 In November
1998, the major U.S. cigarette manufacturers, including RJR Tobacco and B&W, entered into the MSA with 46 U.S. states, Washington, D.C. and certain U.S. territories and possessions. These cigarette manufacturers previously
settled four other cases, brought on behalf of Mississippi, Florida, Texas and Minnesota, by separate agreements with each state. These State Settlement Agreements: 
  

	 	•	 	 settled all health-care cost recovery actions brought by, or on behalf of, the settling jurisdictions; 



 

	 	•	 	 released the major U.S. cigarette manufacturers from various additional present and potential future claims; 



 

	 	•	 	 imposed future payment obligations in perpetuity on RJR Tobacco, B&W and other major U.S. cigarette manufacturers; and



  

	 	•	 	 placed significant restrictions on their ability to market and sell cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products. 



Payments under the State Settlement Agreements are subject to various adjustments for, among other things, the volume of
cigarettes sold, relevant market share and inflation. See “— Health-Care Cost Recovery Cases — State Settlement Agreements” below for a detailed discussion of the State Settlement Agreements, including RAI’s
operating subsidiaries’ monetary obligations under these agreements. RJR Tobacco records the allocation of settlement charges as products are shipped. 

Scheduled Trials. Trial schedules are subject to change, and many cases are dismissed before trial. It is likely
that RJR Tobacco and other cigarette manufacturers will continue to have a similar number of tobacco-related trials in 2013 as it has had in recent years. There are six cases, exclusive of Engle Progeny cases, scheduled for trial as of
September 30, 2013 through September 30, 2014, for RJR Tobacco or its affiliates and indemnitees: one non-smoking and health case, and five individual smoking and health cases. There are 49 Engle Progeny cases against RJR Tobacco
and/or B&W set for trial through September 30, 2014, but it is not known how many of these cases will actually be tried. 

  
 8 








 Trial Results. From January 1, 2010 through September 30,
2013, 112 smoking and health, Engle Progeny and health-care cost recovery cases in which RJR Tobacco or B&W were defendants were tried, including 12 trials for cases where mistrials were declared in the original proceedings. Verdicts in
favor of RJR Tobacco, B&W and, in some cases, RJR Tobacco, B&W and other defendants, were returned in 56 cases, including 21 mistrials, tried in Florida (52), Missouri (1) and West Virginia (4). Verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs were
returned in 52 cases tried in Florida, one in Connecticut, and one in New York. Two cases in Florida were dismissed during trial. 

In the third quarter of 2013, five Engle Progeny cases in which RJR Tobacco was a defendant were tried: 

 

	 	•	 	 In the Grossman v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. retrial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Laura
Grossman, to be 25% at fault and RJR Tobacco to be 75% at fault, and awarded $15.35 million in compensatory damages and $22.5 million in punitive damages. 


  

	 	•	 	 In Dombey v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants, including RJR Tobacco.



  

	 	•	 	 In Gafney v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Frank Gafney, to be 34%
at fault, RJR Tobacco to be 33% at fault and the remaining defendant to be 33% at fault, and awarded $5.8 million in compensatory damages. Punitive damages were not awarded. 



 

	 	•	 	 In Haldeman v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants, including RJR Tobacco.



  

	 	•	 	 In Crawford v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the plaintiff to be 30% at fault and
RJR Tobacco to be 70% at fault, and awarded $9 million in compensatory damages and $1 million in punitive damages. 



For a detailed description of the above-described cases, see “— Engle and Engle Progeny Cases”
below. 
 In addition, since the end of the third quarter of 2013, jurors returned a verdict in the following Engle
Progeny case: 
  

	 	•	 	 In Hildegard Brown v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., the jury returned a verdict in favor of RJR Tobacco. 



In the third quarter of 2013, no non-Engle Progeny individual smoking and health cases in which RJR Tobacco was a
defendant were tried. 
 The following chart reflects the verdicts in the smoking and health cases or health-care cost
recovery cases that have been tried and remain pending as of September 30, 2013, in which verdicts have been returned against RJR Tobacco or B&W, or both. For information on the verdicts in the Engle Progeny cases that have been
tried and remain pending as of September 30, 2013, in which verdicts have been returned against RJR Tobacco or B&W, or both, see the Engle Progeny cases chart above. For information on the post-trial status of individual smoking and
health cases and the governmental health care cost recovery case, see “— Individual Smoking and Health Cases,” and “—Health-Care Cost Recovery Cases – U.S. Department of Justice Case,” respectively, below: 

  
 9 









							
	 Date of Verdict
	  	 Case Name/Type
	  	 Jurisdiction
	  	 Verdict

	 February 2, 2005
	  	 Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco

Corp.
 [Individual]
	  	 Circuit Court,
 Jackson County

(Independence, MO)
	  	$2 million in compensatory damages; 25% of fault assigned to B&W, which reduced the award to $500,000; $20 million in punitive damages. In August 2009, a new trial on punitive damages was conducted and the jury awarded $1.5
million.
				
	 August 17, 2006
	  	 United States v. Philip Morris USA,

Inc.
 [Governmental Health-Care
Cost
 Recovery]
	  	 U.S. District Court, District of
 Columbia
(Washington, DC)
	  	RJR Tobacco and B&W were found liable for civil RICO claims; were enjoined from using certain brand descriptors and from making certain misrepresentations; and were ordered to make corrective communications on five subjects,
including smoking and health and addiction, to reimburse the U.S. Department of Justice appropriate costs associated with the lawsuit, and to maintain document web sites.
				
	 May 26, 2010
	  	 Izzarelli v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

[Individual]
	  	 U.S. District Court,
 District of
Connecticut,
 (Bridgeport, CT)
	  	$13.9 million in compensatory damages; 58% of fault assigned to RJR Tobacco, which reduced the award to $8.08 million against RJR Tobacco; $3.97 million in punitive damages.

 Individual Smoking and Health Cases 

As of September 30, 2013, 96 individual cases were pending in the United States against RJR Tobacco, B&W, as its
indemnitee, or both. This category of cases includes smoking and health cases alleging personal injury brought by or on behalf of individual plaintiffs, but does not include the Broin II, Engle Progeny or West Virginia IPIC cases
discussed below. A total of 94 of the individual cases are brought by or on behalf of individual smokers or their survivors, while the remaining two cases are brought by or on behalf of individuals or their survivors alleging personal injury as a
result of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, referred to as ETS. 
 Below is a description of the individual smoking
and health cases against RJR Tobacco or B&W, or both, which went to trial or were decided during the period from January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013, or remained on appeal as of September 30, 2013. 

On February 1, 2005, the jury returned a split verdict in Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.,
a case filed in May 2003 in Circuit Court, Jackson County, Missouri, finding in favor of B&W on two counts, fraudulent concealment and conspiracy, and finding in favor of the plaintiffs on negligence, which incorporates failure to warn and
product defect claims. The plaintiffs were awarded $2 million in compensatory damages and $20 million in punitive damages; however, the jury found the plaintiff to be 75% at fault and B&W 25% at fault, and thus the compensatory award
was reduced to $500,000. The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the compensatory damages award but reversed and ordered a new trial on punitive damages. On July 29, 2009, RJR Tobacco, on behalf of B&W, paid the compensatory damages verdict,
plus interest, in the amount of approximately $700,000. In August 2009, the jury in the punitive damages retrial returned a verdict for the plaintiffs and awarded the plaintiffs $1.5 million in punitive damages. B&W and the plaintiffs
filed notices of appeal in December 2009. In October 2012, the Missouri Court of Appeals reversed the punitive damages award entered in August 2009, and remanded the case for another new trial on punitive damages. In November 2012, B&W
filed an application for transfer to the Missouri Supreme Court, which was granted in December 2012. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s judgment, and the plaintiffs filed a motion for rehearing in September 2013. A decision
is pending. 
 On May 26, 2010, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in Izzarelli v. R. J. Reynolds
Tobacco Co., a case filed in December 1999 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut. The plaintiff sought to recover damages for personal injuries that the plaintiff alleges she sustained as a result of unsafe and unreasonably
dangerous cigarette products and for economic losses she sustained as a result of unfair trade practices of the defendant. The jury found RJR Tobacco to be 58% at fault and the plaintiff to be 42% at fault, awarded $13.9 million in compensatory
damages and found the plaintiff to be entitled to punitive damages. In December 2010, the 

  
 10 








 
court awarded the plaintiff $3.97 million in punitive damages. Final judgment was entered on December 30, 2010, in the amount of $11.95 million. The court granted the plaintiff’s motion
for offer of judgment interest, and awarded the plaintiff $15.8 million for the period of December 6, 1999 up to and including December 5, 2010, and approximately $4,000 per day thereafter until an amended judgment was entered. The amended
judgment was entered in the amount of approximately $28.1 million on March 4, 2011. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal in September 2011. In September 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an opinion that certified the
following question to the Connecticut Supreme Court: “Does Comment I to section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts preclude a suit premised on strict products liability against a cigarette manufacturer based on evidence that the
defendant purposefully manufactured cigarettes to increase daily consumption without regard to the resultant increase in exposure to carcinogens, but in the absence of evidence of any adulteration or contamination?” Subsequently, the plaintiff
petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to certify a second question to the Connecticut Supreme Court: “Does Comment i to section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts preclude a claim under the [Connecticut Products
Liability Act] against a cigarette manufacturer for negligence (in the design of its cigarette products)?” The Second Circuit has not yet ruled on the plaintiff’s petition. The Second Circuit retained jurisdiction and will decide the case
once the Connecticut Supreme Court either has provided its guidance or has declined certification on the first and, if applicable, second questions. 

On December 12, 2012, in Clinton v. Brown & Williamson Holdings, Inc., the jury returned a verdict in
favor of the plaintiff and awarded $1.35 million in compensatory damages. The case was filed in Supreme Court, New York County, New York. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendant’s products, the decedent, William Champagne,
suffered from lung cancer. The plaintiff sought $100 million in compensatory damages. The defendants removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in 2005. Final judgment against B&W in the amount of
approximately $1.35 million was entered in December 2012. In June 2013, the court denied the defendant’s post-trial motions and granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff’s post-trial motions. The court denied the plaintiff’s
motion for a new trial on loss of consortium damages; however, the court granted the plaintiff’s motion to amend the judgment to include pre- and post-judgment interest and motion for new trial on damages for pain and suffering and for the
descendants’ losses. In August 2013, the parties entered into an agreement to resolve all outstanding issues. As a result, RJR Tobacco, on behalf of B&W, as successor by merger to the American Tobacco Company, paid the plaintiffs $3.6
million in damages on September 4, 2013. 
 On June 19, 2013, in Whitney v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., the
jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants, including RJR Tobacco. The case was filed in January 2011, in the Circuit Court, Alachua County, Florida. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendants’ products, she suffers
from lung cancer and emphysema. The plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was denied on August 2, 2013. Final judgment was entered on July 10, 2013. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the First DCA, and the defendants filed a
notice of cross appeal in August 2013. Briefing is underway. 

  
 11 








 West Virginia IPIC 

In West Virginia, as of September 30, 2013, 30 individual claims remain pending in a consolidated action, In re:
Tobacco Litigation Individual Personal Injury Cases. The defendants are Philip Morris, Lorillard and RJR Tobacco (including claims concerning The American Tobacco Company and B&W). The Case Management Order calls for these cases to be
resolved in a two phase procedure — a common issue trial in Phase I, and, if plaintiffs prevail on one or more issues, a Phase II, consisting of individual trials of liability, medical causation, compensatory damages, and punitive damages for
each of the individual plaintiffs. The Phase I trial began on April 15, 2013 and was concluded on May 15, 2013. It focused on whether defendants manufactured defective products, whether their conduct was tortious and whether their conduct
meets the standard for a potential award of punitive damages under West Virginia law. The jury returned a defense verdict on all claims except for failure to instruct on ventilated cigarettes between 1964 and 1969, and no punitive damages were
awarded. Individual trials, if any, will be limited to those plaintiffs who smoked cigarettes with ventilated filters during that 5-year time frame. On September 16, 2013, the court entered judgment stating that: 

 

	 	•	 	 the jury’s Phase I verdict resolved all issues remaining between the parties in favor of the defendants with respect to the cases brought by
plaintiffs who did not allege that they or their decedent smoked any brands of ventilated filter cigarettes between 1964 and July 1, 1969; 


  

	 	•	 	 the jury’s Phase I verdict does not resolve all issues between the parties (with plaintiffs potentially being eligible to proceed to Phase II,
but only for compensatory damages) with respect to the cases brought by plaintiffs who arguably did allege that they or their decedent smoked any brands of ventilated filter cigarettes between 1964 and July 1, 1969; and 



 

	 	•	 	 final judgment is entered in favor of the defendants with respect to those cases that were dismissed prior to trial. 



The plaintiffs filed a motion to alter or amend the court’s judgment on September 24, 2013. A decision is pending. 

Engle and Engle Progeny Cases 

Trial began in July 1998 in Engle v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a class-action filed in Circuit Court, Miami-Dade
County, Florida. The Engle class consisted of Florida citizens and residents, and their survivors, who suffer from or have died from diseases or medical conditions caused by an addiction to smoking. The action was brought against the major
U.S. cigarette manufacturers, including RJR Tobacco and B&W. In July 1999, the Engle jury found against RJR Tobacco, B&W and the other defendants in the initial phase, which included alleged common issues related to certain
elements of liability, general causation, the addictiveness of cigarettes, and potential entitlement to punitive damages. 

On July 14, 2000, in the second phase of the trial, the jury returned a punitive damages verdict in favor of the class of
approximately $145 billion, including verdicts of $36.3 billion and $17.6 billion against RJR Tobacco and B&W, respectively. 

On appeal, the Florida Supreme Court prospectively decertified the class, and it set aside the punitive damages award as both premature and
excessive. However, the court preserved a number of findings from Phase I of the trial, including findings that cigarettes can cause certain diseases, that nicotine is addictive, and that defendants placed defective cigarettes on the market,
breached duties of care, and concealed health-related information about cigarettes. The court authorized former class members to file individual lawsuits within one year, and it stated that the preserved findings would have “res judicata”
effect in those actions. 
 In the wake of the Florida Supreme Court ruling, thousands of individuals filed separate
lawsuits seeking to benefit from the Engle findings. As of September 30, 2013, RJR Tobacco was a defendant in 5,187 Engle Progeny cases in both state and federal courts in Florida. These cases include approximately 6,344
plaintiffs. Many of these cases are in active discovery or nearing trial. 
 In each Engle Progeny case, a central
issue is the proper use of the preserved Engle findings. Plaintiffs contend that the Engle findings establish the conduct elements of their claims (sale of a defective product, negligent breach of duty, or intentional concealment of
material information) even absent any inquiry into whether the findings are 

  
 12 








 
relevant to the individual claims of the progeny plaintiff. RJR Tobacco and other Engle defendants contend that such use of the Engle findings would violate federal due process. In
2010, in Brown v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, the Eleventh Circuit indicated some support for the defendants’ argument that the Engle findings are fatally ambiguous. However, on March 14, 2013, the Florida Supreme Court
rejected the due-process argument in Douglas v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., and, on August 9, 2013, the Eleventh Circuit, in Walker v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, held that it was bound to defer to the Douglas decision
under the Full Faith and Credit Act. On October 7, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the decision in Douglas, and RJR Tobacco sought further review of the Walker decision by filing a petition for panel rehearing and
rehearing en banc in the Eleventh Circuit. 
 In June 2009, Florida amended its existing bond cap statute by adding a $200
million bond cap that applied to all Engle Progeny cases in the aggregate. In May 2011, Florida removed the provision that allowed it to expire on December 31, 2012. The bond cap for any given individual Engle Progeny case varies
depending on the number of judgments in effect at a given time, but never exceeds $5 million per case. The legislation, which became effective in June 2009 and 2011, applies to judgments entered after the original 2009 effective date. 

Below is a description of the Engle Progeny cases against RJR Tobacco or B&W, or both, which went to trial or were
decided during the period from January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013, or remained on appeal as of September 30, 2013. 

On May 5, 2009, in Sherman v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in September 2007 in the Circuit
Court, Broward County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff, Melba Sherman, alleged that as a result of using the defendant’s products, the decedent, John Sherman, developed lung cancer and died. The
plaintiff sought compensatory damages and an unspecified amount of punitive damages. On May 8, 2009, the jury awarded compensatory damages of $1.55 million and found the decedent to be 50% at fault. No punitive damages were awarded. The
court entered final judgment in the amount of $775,000 in June 2009. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the Fourth DCA, and posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of approximately $900,000. The plaintiff filed a notice of cross appeal of
the final judgment in July 2009. In February 2012, the Fourth DCA affirmed the trial court’s decision. In March 2012, RJR Tobacco filed a notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court. In May 2013, the Florida Supreme
Court accepted jurisdiction, and the case will be submitted without oral argument. 
 On May 20, 2009, in Jimmie Lee
Brown v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in March 2007, in the Circuit Court, Broward County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff alleged that the decedent, Roger Brown, developed smoking
related diseases, which resulted in his death. The plaintiff sought compensatory damages and an unspecified amount of punitive damages. The jury later returned a verdict that the decedent was 50% at fault for his injuries and awarded compensatory
damages of $1.2 million. No punitive damages were awarded. RJR Tobacco’s post-trial motions were denied, and the court entered final judgment in the amount of $600,000. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the Fourth DCA and posted a
supersedeas bond in the amount of approximately $700,000. The Fourth DCA affirmed the trial court’s judgment in September 2011. In November 2011, RJR Tobacco filed a notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court. In
May 2013, the Florida Supreme Court accepted jurisdiction, and the case will be submitted without oral argument. 
 On
February 25, 2010, in Grossman v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in December 2007 in the Circuit Court, Broward County, Florida, the court declared a mistrial due to the jury’s inability to reach a decision. The plaintiff
alleged that as a result of an addiction to cigarettes, the decedent, Laura Grossman, developed lung cancer and died. The plaintiff sought damages in excess of $15,000 and all taxable costs and interest. Retrial began in March 2010. In April 2010,
the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in Phase I, and in Phase II awarded $1.9 million in compensatory damages and no punitive damages. The jury also found RJR Tobacco to be 25% at fault, the decedent to be 70% at fault and the
decedent’s spouse to be 5% at fault. Final judgment was entered in June 2010, in the amount of $483,682. In July 2011, RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the Fourth DCA and posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of approximately $484,000.
The plaintiff filed a notice of cross appeal. In June 2012, the Fourth DCA entered an opinion that affirmed the trial court’s judgment, but remanded the case for a new trial on all Phase II issues. In October 2012, RJR Tobacco filed a notice to
invoke the discretionary jurisdiction 

  
 13 








 
of the Florida Supreme Court. A decision is pending. Retrial began on July 11, 2013. On July 31, 2013, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent to be
25% at fault and RJR Tobacco to be 75% at fault, and awarded $15.35 million in compensatory damages and $22.5 million in punitive damages. Final judgment was entered in August 2013 and did not include a reduction for comparative fault. Post-trial
motions were denied on September 25, 2013. The deadline to file a notice of appeal is October 25, 2013. 
 On
March 10, 2010, in Douglas v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., a case filed in October 2007 in Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, found the decedent, Charlotte Douglas, to be 50% at fault,
RJR Tobacco to be 5% at fault and the remaining defendants to be 45% at fault, and awarded $5 million in compensatory damages. No punitive damages were awarded. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of the decedent’s addiction to smoking the
defendants’ cigarettes, she suffered bodily injury and died. In March 2010, the court entered final judgment against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $250,000. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the Second DCA, and posted a supersedeas bond in
the amount of $250,000. On March 30, 2012, the Second DCA affirmed the trial court’s decision. However, the court agreed that the issue of due process is one that will be applicable to the many Engle Progeny cases being considered
by the trial courts and certified the question regarding the due process issue to the Florida Supreme Court as being one of great importance. RJR Tobacco filed a notice to invoke the discretionary jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court. The
Florida Supreme Court accepted jurisdiction and, in March 2013, affirmed the Second DCA’s ruling for the plaintiff and found that accepting as res judicata the eight Phase I findings approved in Engle does not violate the tobacco
companies’ due process rights. RJR Tobacco’s petition for writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court was denied on October 7, 2013. 

On March 10, 2010, in Cohen v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in May 2007 in the Circuit Court, Broward
County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff alleged that the decedent, Nathan Cohen, developed lung cancer as a result of using the defendants’ products, and sought in excess of $15,000 compensatory
damages and unspecified punitive damages. On March 24, 2010, the jury awarded the plaintiff $10 million in compensatory damages, and found the decedent to be 33.3% at fault, RJR Tobacco to be 33.3% at fault and the remaining defendant to be
33.3% at fault. The jury also awarded $20 million in punitive damages, of which $10 million was assigned to RJR Tobacco. In July 2010, the court entered final judgment against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $3.33 million in compensatory damages and
$10 million in punitive damages and the plaintiff filed a motion to amend or alter the final judgment. The court entered an amended judgment in September 2010 to include interest from the date of the verdict. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to
the Fourth DCA and posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of $2.5 million. In September 2012, the Fourth DCA affirmed the liability finding and the compensatory damages award, but reversed the finding of entitlement to punitive damages, and
remanded the case for a retrial limited to the issue of liability for concealment and conspiracy. The defendants and the plaintiff filed separate notices to invoke the discretionary jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court in January 2013. A
decision is pending. 
 On April 21, 2010, in Townsend v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in December
2007 in the Circuit Court, Alachua County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found RJR Tobacco to be 51% at fault and the decedent, Frank Townsend, to be 49% at fault, and awarded $10.8 million in compensatory damages and
$80 million in punitive damages. The plaintiff alleged that the decedent died from lung cancer as a result of his addiction to the defendant’s products. Final judgment was entered on April 29, 2010, in the amount of $5.5 million in
compensatory damages and $40.8 million in punitive damages, which represents 51% of the original damages awards. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the First DCA and posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of $5 million. In February 2012, the
First DCA affirmed the compensatory damages verdict, but remanded the case to the trial court for remittitur of the punitive damages or a potential new trial on punitive damages. In June 2012, the trial court entered an order that remitted the
punitive damages award to $20 million. The plaintiff consented, and an amended final judgment was entered against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $5.5 million in compensatory damages and $20 million in punitive damages. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of
rejection of the remittitur and a demand for a new trial on the punitive damages issue. RJR Tobacco also filed a notice of appeal of the amended final judgment entered in June 2012. In June 2013, the First DCA affirmed the remitted punitive damage
award, determined that the $20 million award was not excessive, and denied RJR Tobacco’s request to reject the remittitur and demand for a new trial. RJR Tobacco’s motion for rehearing, rehearing en banc, and certification of a conflict in
appellate decisions was denied on August 14, 2013. RJR Tobacco filed a notice to invoke the discretionary jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court in September 2013. A decision is pending. 

  
 14 








 On April 26, 2010, in Putney v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case
filed in December 2007 in the Circuit Court, Broward County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Margot Putney, to be 35% at fault, RJR Tobacco to be 30% at fault and the remaining defendants to be 35%
at fault, and awarded $15.1 million in compensatory damages and $2.5 million in punitive damages each against RJR Tobacco and the remaining defendants. The plaintiff alleged that the decedent suffered from nicotine addiction and lung cancer as a
result of using the defendants’ products. In August 2010, final judgment was entered against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $4.5 million in compensatory damages, and $2.5 million in punitive damages. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal and the
plaintiff filed a notice of cross appeal. In December 2010, the court entered an amended final judgment to provide that interest would run from April 26, 2010. The defendants filed a joint notice of appeal to the Fourth DCA of the amended final
judgment, and RJR Tobacco posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of approximately $2.4 million. In June 2013, the Fourth DCA held that the court erred in denying the defendants’ motion for remittitur of the compensatory damages for loss of
consortium and in striking the defendants’ statute of repose affirmative defenses. As a result, the verdict was reversed, and the case was remanded for further proceedings. The plaintiff’s motion for rehearing, written opinion on one
issue, or certification of conflict to the Florida Supreme Court was denied in August 2013. The defendants and the plaintiff filed separate notices to invoke the discretionary jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court. Decisions are pending. 

On May 20, 2010, in Buonomo v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in October 2007 in the Circuit Court,
Broward County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found RJR Tobacco to be 77.5% at fault and the decedent, Matthew Buonomo, to be 22.5% at fault, and awarded $5.2 million in compensatory damages and $25 million in
punitive damages. The plaintiff alleged that the decedent was addicted to cigarettes and, as a result, developed one or more smoking related medical conditions and/or diseases. Post-trial motions were denied, but the court, in accordance with the
Florida statutory limitation on punitive damage awards, ordered the punitive damage award of $25 million be reduced to $15.7 million – three times the compensatory damages award of $5.2 million. In August 2010, the court entered final judgment
in the amount of $4.06 million in compensatory damages and $15.7 million in punitive damages. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the Fourth DCA and posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of $5 million. The plaintiff also filed a notice of
appeal. In September 2013, the Fourth DCA affirmed the final judgment and damages award to the plaintiff on strict liability and negligence. However, the court reversed the judgment entered for the plaintiff on the claims for fraudulent concealment
and conspiracy to commit fraud by concealment due to the erroneous striking of RJR Tobacco’s statute of repose defense. As a result, the punitive damages award was set aside and remanded for a new trial. 

On October 15, 2010, in Frazier v. Philip Morris USA Inc., a case filed in December 2007 in the Circuit Court,
Miami-Dade County, Florida, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of smoking defendants’, including RJR Tobacco’s, products she developed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Final
judgment was entered in February 2011. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Third DCA, and the defendants filed a cross appeal. On April 11, 2012, the Third DCA reversed the trial court’s judgment, directed entry of judgment in
the plaintiff’s favor and ordered a new trial. In July 2012, the defendants filed a notice to invoke the discretionary jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court. The Florida Supreme Court accepted jurisdiction of the case in September 2013.
Briefing is underway. 
 On October 29, 2010, in Koballa v. Philip Morris USA Inc., a case filed in December
2007, in the Circuit Court, Volusia County, Florida against tobacco industry defendants, including RJR Tobacco, the court declared a mistrial after the jury informed the court that they were unable to reach a verdict. The plaintiff alleged that as a
result of the use of the defendants’ defective and unreasonably dangerous tobacco products, she suffers from, or has suffered from, nicotine addiction, lung cancer and other smoking related medical conditions and/or diseases. Retrial began on
March 21, 2011, and on March 31, 2011, the jury returned an inconsistent verdict. The jury found that RJR Tobacco was not liable for the plaintiff’s injuries, but found that her past injuries were worth $1 million with the plaintiff
being 70% at fault and RJR Tobacco 30% at fault. The court entered final judgment in August 2011. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the Fifth DCA and posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of $300,000. In September 2012, the Fifth DCA
affirmed the trial court’s judgment, per curiam. RJR Tobacco’s motion for a written opinion was granted in October 2012. In November 2012, RJR Tobacco filed a notice to invoke the discretionary jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court. A
decision is pending. 

  
 15 








 On November 4, 2010, in Vasko v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case
filed in January 2008, in the Circuit Court, Broward County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of RJR Tobacco. The jury found that the plaintiff’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations. The plaintiff alleged that the
decedent, John Vasko, was addicted to cigarettes manufactured by the defendants, and as a result, developed one or more smoking related medical conditions and/or diseases, including lung cancer. Final judgment was entered, and the plaintiff filed a
notice of appeal to the Fourth DCA. The Fourth DCA affirmed the trial court’s judgment, per curiam, on March 28, 2013. In June 2013, the Fourth DCA denied the plaintiff’s motion for rehearing and request for opinion. The plaintiff did
not seek review with the Florida Supreme Court. 
 On November 15, 2010, in Webb v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.,
a case filed in December 2007, in the Circuit Court, Levy County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found RJR Tobacco to be 90% at fault and the decedent, James Horner, to be 10% at fault, and awarded $8 million in
compensatory damages and $72 million in punitive damages. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of smoking the defendant’s products, the decedent developed one or more smoking related medical conditions and/or diseases. The court entered final
judgment in November 2010. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the First DCA and posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of $5 million. The plaintiff filed a notice of cross appeal. In April 2012, the First DCA affirmed the liability verdict,
but ordered a remittitur or a new trial on damages. The trial court entered an order of remittitur or, alternatively, for a new trial. The court ordered that the compensatory damage award be reduced to $4 million and the punitive damage award be
reduced to $25 million. The plaintiff consented to the remitted judgment, and RJR Tobacco filed a notice of rejection of the remittitur and demand for a new trial. The trial court entered an amended final judgment in September 2012. RJR Tobacco
filed a notice of appeal to the First DCA of the amended final judgment in October 2012. In November 2012, the Florida Supreme Court denied RJR Tobacco’s petition for review of the First DCA’s decision on the original judgment. RJR
Tobacco’s appeal of the amended judgment remains pending. In August 2013, the First DCA denied RJR Tobacco’s motion for oral argument. 

On February 10, 2011, in Kirkland v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in January 2008, in the Circuit
Court, Hillsborough County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found RJR Tobacco to be 10% at fault and the plaintiff to be 90% at fault, and awarded $100,000 in compensatory damages. The jury also awarded the plaintiff
$250,000 in punitive damages. The plaintiff alleged that he was addicted to cigarettes, and as a result, developed larynx cancer and other smoking related medical conditions and/or diseases. Final judgment was entered in March 2011. The plaintiff
filed a notice of appeal to the Second DCA on April 12, 2011. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of cross appeal and posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of $260,000. In January 2012, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed his appeal. RJR
Tobacco’s appeal remains pending. Briefing is complete. Oral argument has not been scheduled. 
 On March 18,
2011, in Mack v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in June 2008, in the Circuit Court, Alachua County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found RJR Tobacco to be 51% at fault and the decedent, Peter Mack,
Sr., to be 49% at fault, and awarded $1 million in compensatory damages. No punitive damages were awarded. The plaintiff alleged that due to the decedent’s addiction to cigarettes, he developed bronchitis and lung cancer. In April 2011, final
judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff. RJR Tobacco appealed, and the First DCA reversed the trial court’s judgment and remanded the case for a new trial. Retrial began on December 3, 2012. On December 14, 2012, the jury
returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent to be 35% at fault and RJR Tobacco to be 65% at fault and awarded $2.9 million in compensatory damages. Final judgment was entered in December 2012. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of
appeal to the First DCA and posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of $1.9 million. Briefing is underway. 
 On
April 13, 2011, in Tullo v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in December 2007, in the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of RJR Tobacco and the plaintiff, but against the remaining
defendants. The jury awarded $4.5 million in compensatory damages and no punitive damages. The jury found the decedent, Dominick Tullo, to be 45% at fault and the remaining defendants cumulatively to be 55% at fault. The plaintiff alleged that the
decedent was addicted to cigarettes manufactured by the defendants, and as a 

  
 16 








 
result, developed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and other smoking related illnesses and/or diseases. The plaintiff sought in excess of $15,000 against each defendant, taxable costs and
interest. The court denied the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial against RJR Tobacco and denied the remaining defendants’ post-trial motions in June 2011. The remaining defendants filed an appeal to the Fourth DCA, and the plaintiff filed
a cross appeal. The plaintiff also filed a notice of appeal of the order denying the plaintiff’s motion for new trial against RJR Tobacco. RJR Tobacco filed a cross appeal of the same order. In August 2013, the Fourth DCA affirmed the final
judgment entered by the trial court, including the jury’s verdict of no liability to RJR Tobacco. The Fourth DCA denied the plaintiff’s motion for clarification in September 2013. The deadline to seek review with the Florida Supreme Court
is October 16, 2013. 
 On April 26, 2011, in Andy Allen v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in
September 2007, in the Circuit Court, Duval County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found RJR Tobacco to be 45% at fault, the decedent, Patricia Allen, to be 40% at fault and the remaining defendant to be 15% at fault,
and awarded $6 million in compensatory damages and $17 million in punitive damages against each defendant. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of smoking the defendants’ products, the decedent developed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Final judgment was entered against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $19.7 million in May 2011. In October 2011, the court entered a remittitur of the punitive damages to $8.1 million and denied all other post-trial motions. The defendants filed a joint
notice of appeal, RJR Tobacco posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of $3.75 million, and the plaintiff filed a notice of cross appeal in November 2011. In May 2013, the First DCA reversed the trial court’s judgment and remanded the case for
a new trial. The plaintiff’s motion for rehearing or rehearing en banc was denied in July 2013. The new trial has not been scheduled. In August 2013, the plaintiff filed a notice to invoke the discretionary jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme
Court. A decision is pending. 
 On May 20, 2011, in Jewett v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in
December 2007, in the Circuit Court, Duval County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found RJR Tobacco to be 20% at fault, the decedent, Barbara Jewett, to be 70% at fault and the remaining defendant to be 10% at fault,
and awarded $1.1 million in compensatory damages and no punitive damages. The plaintiff alleged that the decedent, Barbara Jewett, was addicted to cigarettes and as a result of her addiction, developed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,
emphysema and respiratory failure. Final judgment was entered in June 2011. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the First DCA and posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of $218,600. In November 2012, the First DCA reversed the judgment and
remanded the case for a new trial. The plaintiff and the defendants filed separate notices to invoke the discretionary jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court in March 2013. Decisions are pending. 

On June 16, 2011, in Soffer v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in December 2007, in the Circuit Court,
Alachua County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found RJR Tobacco to be 40% at fault, the decedent, Maurice Soffer, to be 60% at fault, and awarded $5 million in compensatory damages and no punitive damages. The
plaintiff alleged that the decedent was addicted to cigarettes and, as a result, developed lung cancer and other smoking related conditions and/or diseases. Final judgment was entered against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $2 million. The plaintiff
filed a notice of appeal to the First DCA in July 2011. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of cross appeal and posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of $2 million. In October 2012, the First DCA affirmed the trial court’s ruling in full. On the
direct appeal, the court held that only intentional torts could support a punitive damages claim and held that Engle Progeny plaintiffs may not seek punitive damages for negligence or strict liability because the original Engle class
did not seek punitive damages for those claims. The First DCA certified the question to the Florida Supreme Court as one of great public importance. On the cross appeal, the court rejected RJR Tobacco’s arguments about the use of the
Engle findings and the statute of limitations. RJR Tobacco filed a motion for rehearing or for certification to the Florida Supreme Court and the plaintiff filed a motion for rehearing or rehearing en banc. In January 2013, the First DCA
granted rehearing on RJR Tobacco’s cross appeal to clarify that the trial court’s application of Engle findings did not violate RJR Tobacco’s due process rights. Otherwise, rehearing, rehearing en banc and certification were
denied. RJR Tobacco and the plaintiff have both filed notices to invoke the discretionary jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court. Decisions are pending. 

On July 15, 2011, in Ciccone v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in August 2004, in the Circuit Court,
Broward County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict finding the plaintiff is a member of the Engle class. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of the use of the defendant’s tobacco products, the decedent, George Ciccone, suffered from


  
 17 








 
nicotine addiction and one or more smoking related diseases and/or medical conditions. On July 21, 2011, the jury awarded approximately $3.2 million in compensatory damages and $50,000 in
punitive damages. The jury found the decedent to be 70% at fault and RJR Tobacco to be 30% at fault. Final judgment was entered in September 2011, and RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the Fourth DCA. RJR Tobacco posted a supersedeas bond in
the amount of approximately $1 million on October 17, 2011. In August 2013, the Fourth DCA affirmed the judgment of the trial court, but reversed the punitive damages award. RJR Tobacco filed a motion for rehearing or rehearing en banc in
September 2013. A decision is pending. 
 On September 15, 2011, in Ojeda v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case
filed in October 2007, in the Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of RJR Tobacco. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of the use of the defendant’s products, the decedent, Juan Ojeda, suffered from
one or more smoking related medical conditions and/or diseases. Final judgment was entered September 26, 2011. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Third DCA in October 2012. Briefing is underway. 

On November 28, 2011, in Sury v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in November 2007, in the Circuit Court,
Duval County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, William Sury, to be 60% at fault, RJR Tobacco to be 20% at fault, and the remaining defendant to be 20% at fault, and awarded $1 million in compensatory
damages and no punitive damages. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of the use of the defendants’ products, the decedent suffered from lung cancer. Final judgment was entered in March 2012. The court entered an amended final judgment that
held the defendants jointly and severally liable for the entire $1 million, even though the jury had allocated 60% of fault to the plaintiff and 20% of fault to a co-defendant. The defendants filed a notice of appeal to the First DCA on
April 20, 2012, and RJR Tobacco posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of $500,000. In June 2013, the First DCA affirmed the final judgment. RJR Tobacco’s motion for rehearing was denied in August 2013. RJR Tobacco filed a notice to
invoke the discretionary jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court in September 2013. A decision is pending. 
 On
January 24, 2012, in Hallgren v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in April 2007, in the Circuit Court, Highlands County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Claire Hallgren, to be 50%
at fault, RJR Tobacco to be 25% at fault, and the remaining defendant to be 25% at fault, and awarded $2 million in compensatory damages and $750,000 in punitive damages against each defendant. The plaintiff alleged that the decedent was addicted to
the defendants’ products, and as a result, suffered from lung cancer. In March 2012, the court entered final judgment in the amount of approximately $1 million for which RJR Tobacco and the other defendant are jointly and severally liable; and
$750,000 in punitive damages against each defendant. The defendants filed a joint notice of appeal to the Second DCA, and RJR Tobacco posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of approximately $1.3 million in May 2012. The plaintiff filed a notice of
cross appeal. Oral argument occurred on June 4, 2013. A decision is pending. 
 On January 25, 2012, in Ward v.
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in December 2007, in the Circuit Court, Escambia County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Mattie Ward, to be 50% at fault, RJR Tobacco to be 30% at fault,
and the remaining defendants, collectively, to be 20% at fault, and awarded $1 million in compensatory damages and $1.7 million in punitive damages. The plaintiff alleged that the decedent was addicted to the defendants’ products, and as a
result, suffered from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and other smoking related conditions and/or diseases. In March 2012, the court entered final judgment in the amount of $487,000 in compensatory damages, for which RJR Tobacco and the other
defendants are jointly and severally liable; and $1.7 million in punitive damages against RJR Tobacco. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the First DCA and posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of $2.19 million in June 2012. The plaintiff
filed a notice of cross appeal. In September 2013, the First DCA affirmed the trial court’s judgment, per curiam. RJR Tobacco filed a motion for rehearing on September 23, 2013. A decision is pending. 

On February 29, 2012, in Marotta v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in December 2007, in the Circuit
Court, Broward County, Florida, the court declared a mistrial during jury prequalification. The plaintiff alleged that the decedent, Phil Marotta, was addicted to cigarettes and, as a result, suffered from lung cancer. The plaintiff sought
compensatory damages in excess of $75,000, including compensatory and punitive damages, costs and pre-judgment interest. Retrial began on March 7, 2013. On March 20, 2013, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the


  
 18 








 
plaintiff, found the decedent to be 42% at fault and RJR Tobacco to be 58% at fault and awarded $6 million in compensatory damages and no punitive damages. Post-trial motions were denied, final
judgment was entered, and RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the Fourth DCA in April 2013. The plaintiff filed a notice of cross appeal in May 2013. Briefing is underway. 

On March 19, 2012, in McCray v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in January 2008, in the U.S. District
Court for the Middle District of Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants, including RJR Tobacco. The plaintiff alleged that the decedent, Mercedia Walker, was addicted to the defendants’ tobacco products, and as a result,
suffered from one or more smoking related diseases and/or medical conditions. The plaintiff sought compensatory damages for all injuries and losses, all recoverable costs of the case, and all legally recoverable interest. Final judgment was entered
in March 2012. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Eleventh Circuit in July 2012. Oral argument is scheduled for the week of December 9, 2013. 

On March 27, 2012, in Emmon Smith v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in January 2008 in the Circuit
Court, Jackson County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found Mr. Smith to be 30% at fault and RJR Tobacco to be 70% at fault, and awarded $10 million in compensatory damages. The jury also awarded $20 million in
punitive damages. The plaintiff alleged that he was addicted to cigarettes manufactured by the defendants, and as a result, developed lung cancer. Final judgment was entered on April 2, 2012. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the First
DCA and posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of $5 million. Oral argument occurred on January 15, 2013. A decision is pending. 

On April 10, 2012, in Duke v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in December 2007, in the U.S. District
Court for the Middle District of Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Sarah Duke, to be 75% at fault and RJR Tobacco to be 25% at fault, and awarded $30,705 in compensatory damages and no entitlement to
punitive damages. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of the use of the defendant’s products, the decedent developed smoking related diseases. The plaintiff sought compensatory and punitive damages, including costs and interest. RJR Tobacco
filed a notice of appeal to the Eleventh Circuit in September 2012. In November 2012, RJR Tobacco posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of approximately $7,800. In February 2013, the Eleventh Circuit granted the joint motion to consolidate the
appeal with the appeal in Walker v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., discussed below. In September 2013, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff. RJR Tobacco filed a petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en
banc on October 7, 2013. A decision is pending. 
 On May 21, 2012, in Walker v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco
Co., a case filed in August 2007, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Albert Walker, to be 90% at fault and RJR Tobacco to be 10% at fault, and
awarded $275,000 in compensatory damages with no entitlement to punitive damages. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of the use of the defendant’s products, the decedent suffered bodily injury. The plaintiff sought compensatory and punitive
damages, including costs and interest. The court entered final judgment in May 2012. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the Eleventh Circuit and posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of $27,775. In February 2013, the Eleventh Circuit granted
the joint motion to consolidate the appeal with the appeal in Duke v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., discussed above. RJR Tobacco posted a substitute supersedeas bond in the amount of approximately $45,800 in June 2013. In September 2013, the
Eleventh Circuit affirmed the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff. RJR Tobacco filed a petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc on October 7, 2013. A decision is pending. 

On May 17, 2012, in Calloway v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in December 2007, in the Circuit Court,
Broward County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Johnnie Calloway, to be 20.5% at fault, RJR Tobacco to be 27% at fault, and the remaining defendants collectively to be 52.5% at fault, and awarded
$20.5 million in compensatory damages and $17.25 million in punitive damages against RJR Tobacco and $37.6 million collectively against the remaining defendants. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendants’ products, the
decedent became addicted and developed smoking-related diseases and/or conditions. The plaintiff sought compensatory and punitive damages, including costs and interest. In its ruling on the post-trial motions, the court determined that the
jury’s apportionment of comparative fault did not apply to the compensatory damages award. Final judgment was entered in August 2012. In September 2012, the defendants filed a notice of appeal to the Fourth DCA, and RJR Tobacco posted a
supersedeas bond in the amount of $1.5 million. The plaintiff filed a notice of cross appeal. Briefing is underway. 

  
 19 








 On August 1, 2012, in Hiott v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case
filed in January 2008, in the Circuit Court, Duval County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Kenneth Hiott, to be 60% at fault and RJR Tobacco to be 40% at fault, and awarded $1.83 million in
compensatory damages and no punitive damages. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendant’s product, the decedent suffered from addiction and smoking related diseases and/or conditions. The plaintiff sought an unspecified
amount of compensatory and punitive damages. In November 2012, final judgment was entered against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $730,000 in compensatory damages. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the First DCA and posted a supersedeas bond in
the amount of $730,000 in December 2012. Oral argument has been scheduled for November 5, 2013. 
 On August 1,
2012, in Denton v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in August 2007, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, a jury found the defendants liable, but allocated 100% of fault to the decedent, Linda Denton. The
plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendants’ products, the decedent suffered from smoking related diseases and/or conditions. The plaintiff sought an unspecified amount of compensatory and punitive damages. Final judgment was
entered on August 8, 2012. The plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial in September 2012. A decision is pending. 
 On
August 10, 2012, in Hancock v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., a case filed in January 2008, in the Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Edna Siwieck, to be 90% at
fault, RJR Tobacco to be 5% at fault and the remaining defendant to be 5% at fault. However, the jury did not award compensatory damages and found that the plaintiff was not entitled to punitive damages. The court determined that the jury verdict
was inconsistent due to the parties previously stipulating to $110,200 in medical expenses, which is subject to the allocation of fault. The defendants agreed to an additur for that amount. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the
defendants’ products, the decedent suffered from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The plaintiff sought an unspecified amount of compensatory and punitive damages, costs and interest. Final judgment was entered against RJR Tobacco in the
amount of $705 in October 2012. The stipulated amount was reduced by the defendants’ motion to reduce economic damages by collateral sources. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Fourth DCA and the defendants filed a notice of cross
appeal, in November 2012. Briefing is underway. 
 On September 19, 2012, in Baker v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco
Co., a case filed in November 2007, in the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, RJR Tobacco. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendant’s products, the decedent,
Elmer Baker, suffered from lung cancer. The plaintiff sought compensatory damages in excess of $15,000, costs and interest. Final judgment was entered in January 2013, in favor of RJR Tobacco. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Fourth DCA
and RJR Tobacco filed a notice of cross appeal in February 2013. Briefing is underway. 
 On September 20, 2012, in
Sikes v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in December 2007, in the Circuit Court, Duval County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Jimmie Sikes, to be 49% at fault and RJR Tobacco to be
51% at fault, and awarded $4.1 million in compensatory damages and $2 million in punitive damages. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendant’s product, the decedent suffered from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Final
judgment was entered against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $6.1 million on June 3, 2013. The court entered a corrected final judgment against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $5.5 million and vacated the June 3, 2013 final judgment. RJR Tobacco
filed a notice of appeal to the First DCA, and posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of $5 million, in July 2013. Briefing is underway. 

On October 17, 2012, in James Smith v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in August 2007, in the U.S.
District Court for the Middle District of Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Wanette Smith, to be 45% at fault and RJR Tobacco to be 55% at fault, and awarded $600,000 in compensatory damages and
$20,000 in punitive damages. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendant’s products, the decedent suffered from lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The 

  
 20 








 
plaintiff sought compensatory and punitive damages, costs and interest. Final judgment was entered against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $620,000. Post-trial motions were denied in August 2013.
RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the Eleventh Circuit in September 2013. Briefing is underway. 
 On October 18,
2012, in Schlenther v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in January 2008, in the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Beverly Schlenther, to be 50% at
fault and RJR Tobacco to be 50% at fault, and awarded $5 million in compensatory damages and $2.5 million in punitive damages. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendant’s products, the decedent suffered from chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease and heart disease. The plaintiff sought compensatory and punitive damages, costs and interest. In April 2013, the court vacated the punitive damage award, granted a new trial on entitlement to punitive damages and the
amount of any such damages and abated the new trial pending the Florida Supreme Court decision in Soffer v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., described above. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal, and RJR Tobacco filed a notice of cross appeal to
the Second DCA. Briefing is underway. 
 On October 19, 2012, in Ballard v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case
filed in September 2007 in the Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the plaintiff to be 45% at fault and RJR Tobacco to be 55% at fault, and awarded $8.55 million in compensatory
damages. Punitive damages were not at issue. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendant’s products, he suffers from bladder cancer and emphysema. The court entered final judgment against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $4.7
million in October 2012, and in August 2013, the court entered an amended final judgment against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $5 million. Post-trial motions were denied on September 20, 2013. The deadline to file a notice of appeal is
October 21, 2013. 
 On October 25, 2012, in Lock v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., a case filed in November
2007, in the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the plaintiff to be 82% at fault, RJR Tobacco to be 9% at fault and the remaining defendant to be 9% at fault, and awarded $1.15 million
in compensatory damages. Punitive damages were not at issue. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendants’ products, he suffers from lung cancer. Final judgment was entered against RJR Tobacco and the remaining defendants in
the amount of $103,500 each. The defendants filed a joint notice of appeal to the Second DCA in March 2013, and RJR Tobacco posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of $103,500. Briefing is underway. 

On December 12, 2012, in Virginia Williams v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in December 2007, in the
Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Milton Williams, to be 15% at fault and RJR Tobacco to be 85% at fault, and awarded $5 million in compensatory damages. Punitive
damages were not sought. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendant’s products, the decedent suffered from pharyngeal cancer. Final judgment was entered against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $4.25 million in compensatory
damages in January 2013. Post-trial motions were denied in July 2013. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the Third DCA, and the plaintiff filed a notice of cross appeal in August 2013. Briefing is underway. 

On February 5, 2013, in Wilder v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in August 2007, in the U.S. District
Court for the Middle District of Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendants’ products, the decedent, Jane Hewett, became addicted and suffered from
smoking-related diseases and/or conditions. Final judgment was entered in February 2013. The plaintiff did not seek further review of the case. 

On February 11, 2013, in Evers v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in November 2007, in the Circuit Court,
Hillsborough County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Jacqueline Loyd, to be 31% at fault, RJR Tobacco to be 60% at fault, and the remaining defendant to be 9% at fault, and awarded $3.23 million in
compensatory damages and $12.36 million in punitive damages against RJR Tobacco only. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendants’ products, the decedent became addicted and suffered from smoking-related diseases and/or
conditions. In March 2013, the court granted the defendants’ post-trial motions for directed verdict on fraudulent concealment, conspiracy and punitive damages. As a result, the 

  
 21 








 
$12.36 million punitive damages award was set aside. The plaintiff’s motion to reconsider directed verdict as to concealment, conspiracy and punitive damages was denied on April 8,
2013. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Second DCA, the defendants filed a notice of cross appeal, and RJR Tobacco posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of $1.77 million in May 2013. Briefing is underway. 

On February 13, 2013, in Schoeff v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in November 2007, in the Circuit
Court, Broward County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, James Schoeff, to be 25% at fault, RJR Tobacco to be 75% at fault, and awarded $10.5 million in compensatory damages and $30 million in punitive
damages. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendant’s products, the decedent suffered from addiction and one or more smoking-related diseases and/or conditions, including lung cancer. In April 2013, final judgment was entered
against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $7.875 million in compensatory damages and $30 million in punitive damages. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the Fourth DCA, and the plaintiff filed a notice of cross appeal in May 2013. Briefing is
underway. 
 On March 20, 2013, in Giddens v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in January 2008, in the
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of RJR Tobacco and the plaintiff and against the remaining defendant, found the decedent, Roger Giddens, to be 93% at fault and the remaining defendant to be
7% at fault and awarded $80,000 in compensatory damages and no punitive damages. The plaintiff alleged that the decedent was addicted to cigarettes manufactured by the defendants which resulted in the decedent’s death. In March 2013, final
judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff and RJR Tobacco, and against a co-defendant in the amount of $5,600. In April 2013, the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice. The parties agreed that the case is voluntarily
dismissed with prejudice and that the judgment in the case is released and should be vacated. The defendants filed a motion to vacate the judgment. A decision is pending. 

On March 29, 2013, in Fazekas v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in January 2008, in the U.S. District
Court for the Middle District of Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants, including RJR Tobacco. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendants’ products, the decedent, Kenneth Kauffman, suffered from lung
cancer. Final judgment was entered on April 11, 2013. The plaintiff did not seek further review of the case. 
 On
April 1, 2013, in Searcy v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in January 2008, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Carol LaSard,
to be 40% at fault, RJR Tobacco to be 30% at fault and the remaining defendant to be 30% at fault, and awarded $6 million in compensatory damages and $10 million in punitive damages against each defendant. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of
using the defendants’ products, the decedent suffered from lung cancer. Final judgment was entered against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $6 million in compensatory damages and $10 million in punitive damages. In September 2013, the trial court
granted the defendants’ motion for a new trial, or in the alternative, reduction or remittitur of the damages awarded to the extent it sought remittitur of the damages. The compensatory damage award was remitted to $1 million, and the punitive
damage award was remitted to $1.67 million against each defendant. The remaining post-trial motions were denied. The plaintiff filed a motion to reconsider the trial court’s order granting in part the defendants’ motion for remittitur of
the damages award. A decision is pending. 
 On April 18, 2013, in Anderson v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a
case pending in Hillsborough County, Florida, the court declared a mistrial due to the jury’s inability to reach a decision. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendants’ products, the decedent, Daniel Begley suffered
from esophageal cancer. Retrial is scheduled for January 6, 2014. 
 On April 18, 2013, in Aycock v. R. J.
Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in January 2008, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Richard Aycock, to be 27.5% at fault and RJR Tobacco to
be 72.5% at fault, and awarded $5.9 million in compensatory damages. Punitive damages were not awarded. The plaintiff alleged that the decedent was addicted to cigarettes manufactured by the defendant and, as a result, suffered from lung cancer.
Final judgment was entered against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $4.28 million in April 2013. Post-trial motions were denied in August 2013. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal to the Eleventh Circuit in September 2013. Briefing is underway. 

  
 22 








 On May 2, 2013, in LaMotte v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case
filed in September 2007, in the Circuit Court, Escambia County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants, including RJR Tobacco. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of smoking the defendants’ products, the decedent,
Vivian Kemp, developed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and other smoking related diseases and/or conditions. Final judgment was entered in May 2013. The plaintiff did not seek further review of the case. 

On May 2, 2013, in David Cohen v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in December 2007, in the Circuit Court,
Palm Beach County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Helen Cohen, to be 40% at fault, RJR Tobacco to be 30% at fault, and the remaining defendants collectively to be 30% at fault, and awarded $2.06
million in compensatory damages. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendants’ products, the decedent, Helen Cohen, became addicted and suffered from one or more smoking related diseases and/or conditions. Final judgment was
entered against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $617,000 in May 2013. In July 2013, the court granted the defendants’ motion for a new trial due to the plaintiff’s improper arguments during closing. The new trial date has not been scheduled.
The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Fourth DCA, and the defendants filed a notice of cross appeal. Briefing is underway. 

On May 22, 2013, in John Campbell v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case pending in Polk County, Florida, a jury
returned a verdict in favor of the defendants, including RJR Tobacco. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of smoking the defendants’ products, the decedent, Judy Campbell, became addicted to smoking cigarettes and suffered from unspecified
smoking related conditions and/or diseases. The plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was denied and the court entered final judgment in July 2013. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Second DCA, and the defendants filed a notice of
cross appeal in August 2013. Briefing is underway. 
 On May 23, 2013, in Earl Graham v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco
Co., a case filed in January 2008, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Faye Graham, to be 70% at fault, RJR Tobacco to be 20% at fault and the
remaining defendant to be 10% at fault, and awarded $2.75 million in compensatory damages. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of smoking the defendants’ products, the decedent became addicted to smoking cigarettes which resulted in her
death. Final judgment was entered against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $550,000 in May 2013. Post-trial motions were denied in September 2013. The deadline to file a notice of appeal is October 10, 2013. 

On June 4, 2013, in Starr-Blundell v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in December 2007, in the Circuit
Court, Duval County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Lucy Mae Starr, to be 80% at fault, RJR Tobacco to be 10% at fault and the remaining defendant to be 10% at fault, and awarded $500,000 in
compensatory damages. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of smoking the defendants’ products, the decedent suffered from lung cancer and other smoking relating diseases and/or conditions. Post-trial motions are pending. 

On June 7, 2013, in Odum v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in November 2007, in the Circuit Court, Duval
County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Ethelene Hazouri, to be 50% at fault and RJR Tobacco to be 50% at fault, and awarded $200,000 in compensatory damages. The plaintiff alleged that as a result
of smoking the defendant’s products, the decedent suffered from lung cancer. A hearing regarding the post-trial motions occurred on October 1, 2013. A decision is pending. 

On June 12, 2013, in Weinstein v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in December 2007, in the Circuit Court,
Palm Beach County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of RJR Tobacco. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of smoking the defendant’s products, the decedent, Irwin Weinstein, suffered from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The
plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was denied, and final judgment was entered in August 2013. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Fourth DCA in September 2013, and RJR Tobacco filed a notice of cross appeal. Briefing is underway. 


  
 23 








 On June 14, 2013, in Skolnick v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case
filed in December 2007, in the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Leo Skolnick, to be 40% at fault, RJR Tobacco to be 30% at fault and the remaining defendant to be 30%
at fault, and awarded $2.56 million in compensatory damages. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendants’ products, the decedent suffered from lung cancer. The court entered final judgment against RJR Tobacco in the amount of
$766,500 in July 2013. A hearing on the post-trial motions is scheduled for November 1, 2013. 
 On June 19, 2013,
in Thibault v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case pending in the Circuit Court, Escambia County, Florida, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Evelyn Thibault, to be 30% at fault and RJR Tobacco to be 70%
at fault, and awarded $1.75 million in compensatory damages and $1.28 million in punitive damages. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendant’s products, the decedent suffered from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The
court determined that comparative fault did not apply to reduce the amount of the verdict. In June 2013, the court entered final judgment against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $3.03 million. Post-trial motions were denied, and RJR Tobacco filed a
notice of appeal to the First DCA in August 2013. 
 On June 24, 2013, in Hausner v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.,
a case filed in December 2007, in the Circuit Court, Alachua County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of RJR Tobacco. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of using the defendant’s products, the decedent, Charles Clark, suffered
from lung cancer. The plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal of RJR Tobacco with prejudice in July 2013. 
 On
August 20, 2013, in Dombey v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case pending in Broward County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants, including RJR Tobacco. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of smoking the
defendants’ products, the decedent, Daniel Dombey, developed one or more smoking related conditions and/or diseases. Final judgment was entered in September 2013. The deadline to file a notice of appeal is October 9, 2013. 

On September 20, 2013, in Gafney v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case pending in Palm Beach County, Florida, a
jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the decedent, Frank Gafney, to be 34% at fault, RJR Tobacco to be 33% at fault and the remaining defendant to be 33% at fault, and awarded $5.8 million in compensatory damages. Punitive
damages were not awarded. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of smoking the defendants’ products, the decedent developed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Final judgment was entered against RJR Tobacco in the amount of $1.9 million in
September 2013. Post-trial motions are pending. 
 On September 24, 2013, in Haldeman v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco
Co., a case pending in Marion County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants, including RJR Tobacco. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of smoking the defendants’ products, the decedent, Margaret McEniry,
developed one or more smoking related conditions or diseases, including pancreatic cancer. Final judgment has not been entered. 

On September 30, 2013, in Crawford v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case pending in Miami-Dade County, Florida, a
jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the plaintiff to be 30% at fault and RJR Tobacco to be 70% at fault, and awarded $9 million in compensatory damages and $1 million in punitive damages. The plaintiff alleged that as a result
of smoking the defendant’s products, he suffered from addiction and one or more smoking related conditions and/or diseases. Final judgment has not been entered. 

On October 4, 2013, in Hildegard Brown v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in November 2007, in the
Circuit Court, Escambia County, Florida, a jury returned a verdict in favor of RJR Tobacco. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of smoking the defendant’s products, the decedent, William Brown, suffered from lung cancer. Final judgment has
not been entered. 
 Broin II Cases 

RJR Tobacco, B&W and other cigarette manufacturer defendants settled Broin v. Philip Morris, Inc. in October
1997. This case had been brought in Florida state court on behalf of flight attendants alleged to have suffered from diseases or ailments caused by exposure to ETS in airplane cabins. The settlement agreement required the


  
 24 








 
participating tobacco companies to pay a total of $300 million in three annual $100 million installments, allocated among the companies by market share, to fund research on the early
detection and cure of diseases associated with tobacco smoke. It also required those companies to pay a total of $49 million for the plaintiffs’ counsel’s fees and expenses. RJR Tobacco’s portion of these payments was
approximately $86 million; B&W’s portion of these payments was approximately $57 million. The settlement agreement bars class members from bringing aggregate claims or obtaining punitive damages and also bars individual claims to
the extent that they are based on fraud, misrepresentation, conspiracy to commit fraud or misrepresentation, RICO, suppression, concealment or any other alleged intentional or willful conduct. The defendants agreed that, in any individual case
brought by a class member, the defendant will bear the burden of proof with respect to whether ETS can cause certain specifically enumerated diseases, referred to as “general causation.” With respect to all other issues relating to
liability, including whether an individual plaintiff’s disease was caused by his or her exposure to ETS in airplane cabins, referred to as “specific causation,” the individual plaintiff will have the burden of proof. On
September 7, 1999, the Florida Supreme Court approved the settlement. The Broin II cases arose out of the settlement of this case. 

On October 5, 2000, the Broin court entered an order applicable to all Broin II cases that the terms
of the Broin settlement agreement do not require the individual Broin II plaintiffs to prove the elements of strict liability, breach of warranty or negligence. Under this order, there is a rebuttable presumption in the
plaintiffs’ favor on those elements, and the plaintiffs bear the burden of proving that their alleged adverse health effects actually were caused by exposure to ETS in airplane cabins, that is, specific causation. 

As of September 30, 2013, there were 2,574 Broin II lawsuits pending in Florida. There have been no Broin
II trials since 2007. 
 Class-Action Suits 

Overview. As of September 30, 2013, eight class-action cases were pending in the United States against RJR
Tobacco or its affiliates or indemnitees. In 1996, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Castano v. American Tobacco Co. overturned the certification of a nation-wide class of persons whose claims related to alleged addiction to tobacco
products. Since this ruling by the Fifth Circuit, most class-action suits have sought certification of state-wide, rather than nation-wide, classes. Class-action suits based on claims similar to those asserted in Castano or claims that class
members are at a greater risk of injury or injured by the use of tobacco or exposure to ETS are pending against RJR Tobacco and its affiliates and indemnitees in state or federal courts in California, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, and West
Virginia. All pending class-action cases are discussed below. 
 The pending class actions against RJR Tobacco or its
affiliates or indemnitees include four cases alleging that the use of the term “lights” constitutes unfair and deceptive trade practices under state law or violates the federal RICO statute. Such suits are pending in state or federal
courts in Illinois and Missouri and are discussed below under “— ‘Lights’ Cases.” 
 Finally,
certain third-party payers have filed health-care cost recovery actions in the form of class actions. These cases are discussed below under “— Health-Care Cost Recovery Cases.” 

Few smoker class-action complaints have been certified or, if certified, have survived on appeal. Eighteen federal courts,
including two courts of appeals, and most state courts that have considered the issue have rejected class certification in such cases. Apart from the Castano case discussed above, only two smoker class actions have been certified by a federal
court — In re Simon (II) Litigation, and Schwab [McLaughlin] v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., both of which were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York and ultimately decertified. 

California Business and Professions Code Case. In Sateriale v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a class action
filed in November 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, the plaintiffs brought the case on behalf of all persons who tried unsuccessfully to redeem Camel Cash certificates from 1991 through March 31, 2007,
or who held Camel Cash certificates as of March 31, 2007. The plaintiffs allege that in response to the defendants’ action to discontinue redemption of Camel Cash as of March 31, 2007, customers, like the plaintiffs, attempted to
exchange their Camel Cash for merchandise and that the defendants, however, did not have any merchandise to exchange for Camel Cash. The plaintiffs allege unfair business practices, deceptive practices, breach


  
 25 








 
of contract and promissory estoppel. The plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, actual damages, costs and expenses. In January 2010, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss, which prompted the
plaintiffs to file an amended complaint in February 2010. The class definition changed to a class consisting of all persons who reside in the U.S. and tried unsuccessfully to redeem Camel Cash certificates, from October 1, 2006 (six months
before the defendant ended the Camel Cash program) or who held Camel Cash certificates as of March 31, 2007. The plaintiffs also brought the class on behalf of a proposed California subclass, consisting of all California residents meeting the
same criteria. In May 2010, RJR Tobacco’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint for lack of jurisdiction over subject matter and, alternatively, for failure to state a claim was granted with leave to amend. The plaintiffs filed a second
amended complaint. In July 2010, RJR Tobacco’s motion to dismiss the second amended complaint was granted with leave to amend. The plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint, and RJR Tobacco filed a motion to dismiss in September 2010. In
December 2010, the court granted RJR Tobacco’s motion to dismiss with prejudice. Final judgment was entered by the court, and the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal, in January 2011. In July 2012, the appellate court affirmed the dismissal of
the plaintiffs’ claims under the Unfair Competition Law and the Consumer Legal Remedies Acts and reversed the dismissal of the plaintiffs’ claims for promissory estoppel and breach of contract. RJR Tobacco’s motion for rehearing or
rehearing en banc was denied in October 2012. RJR Tobacco filed its answer to the plaintiffs’ third amended complaint in December 2012. Trial is scheduled for November 4, 2014. 

“Lights” Cases. As noted above, “lights” class-action cases are pending against RJR Tobacco or
B&W in Illinois (2) and Missouri (2). The classes in these cases generally seek to recover $50,000 to $75,000 per class member for compensatory and punitive damages, injunctive and other forms of relief, and attorneys’ fees and costs
from RJR Tobacco and/or B&W. In general, the plaintiffs allege that RJR Tobacco or B&W made false and misleading claims that “lights” cigarettes were lower in tar and nicotine and/or were less hazardous or less mutagenic than other
cigarettes. The cases typically are filed pursuant to state consumer protection and related statutes. 
 Many of these
“lights” cases were stayed pending review of the Good v. Altria Group, Inc. case by the U.S. Supreme Court. In that “lights” class-action case against Altria Group, Inc. and Philip Morris USA, the
U.S. Supreme Court decided that these claims are not preempted by the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act or by the Federal Trade Commission’s, referred to as FTC, historic regulation of the industry. Since this decision in
December 2008, a number of the stayed cases have become active again. 
 The seminal “lights” class-action case
involves RJR Tobacco’s competitor, Philip Morris, Inc. Trial began in Price v. Philip Morris, Inc. in January 2003. In March 2003, the trial judge entered judgment against Philip Morris in the amount of $7.1 billion in
compensatory damages and $3 billion in punitive damages. Based on Illinois law, the bond required to stay execution of the judgment was set initially at $12 billion. Philip Morris pursued various avenues of relief from the $12 billion
bond requirement. On December 15, 2005, the Illinois Supreme Court reversed the lower court’s decision and sent the case back to the trial court with instructions to dismiss the case. On December 5, 2006, the trial court granted the
defendant’s motion to dismiss and for entry of final judgment. The case was dismissed with prejudice the same day. In December 2008, the plaintiffs filed a petition for relief from judgment, stating that the U.S. Supreme Court’s
decision in Good v. Altria Group, Inc. rejected the basis for the reversal. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ petition for relief from judgment in February 2009. In March 2009,
the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the Illinois Appellate Court, Fifth Judicial District, requesting a reversal of the February 2009 order and remand to the circuit court. On February 24, 2011, the appellate court entered an order,
concluding that the two-year time limit for filing a petition for relief from a final judgment began to run when the trial court dismissed the plaintiffs’ lawsuit on December 18, 2006. The appellate court therefore found that the petition
was timely, reversed the order of the trial court, and remanded the case for further proceedings. Philip Morris filed a petition for leave to appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court. On September 28, 2011, the Illinois Supreme Court denied Philip
Morris’s petition for leave to appeal and returned the case to the trial court for further proceedings. In December 2012, the trial court denied the plaintiffs’ petition for relief from the judgment. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal
to the Illinois Appellate Court, Fifth Judicial District. Oral argument is scheduled for October 23, 2013. 
 In
Turner v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in February 2000 in Circuit Court, Madison County, Illinois, a judge certified a class in November 2001. In June 2003, RJR Tobacco filed a motion to stay the case pending
Philip Morris’s appeal of the Price v. Philip Morris Inc. case mentioned above, which the judge denied in July 2003. 

  
 26 








 
In October 2003, the Illinois Fifth District Court of Appeals denied RJR Tobacco’s emergency stay/supremacy order request. In November 2003, the Illinois Supreme Court granted RJR
Tobacco’s motion for a stay pending the court’s final appeal decision in Price. On October 11, 2007, the Illinois Fifth District Court of Appeals dismissed RJR Tobacco’s appeal of the court’s denial of its emergency
stay/supremacy order request and remanded the case to the Circuit Court. A status conference is scheduled for January 29, 2014. 

In Howard v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., another case filed in February 2000 in Circuit Court,
Madison County, Illinois, a judge certified a class in December 2001. In June 2003, the trial judge issued an order staying all proceedings pending resolution of the Price v. Philip Morris, Inc. case mentioned above. The
plaintiffs appealed this stay order to the Illinois Fifth District Court of Appeals, which affirmed the Circuit Court’s stay order in August 2005. There is currently no activity in the case. 

A “lights” class-action case is pending against each of RJR Tobacco and B&W in Missouri. In Collora v.
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed in May 2000 in Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri, a judge in St. Louis certified a class in December 2003. In April 2007, the court granted the plaintiffs’ motion to
reassign Collora and the following cases to a single general division: Craft v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc. and Black v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., discussed below. In April 2008, the court
stayed the case pending U.S. Supreme Court review in Good v. Altria Group, Inc. A nominal trial date of January 10, 2011 was scheduled, but it did not proceed at that time. A status conference is scheduled for February 3,
2014. 
 Finally, in Black v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., a case filed in November 2000 in
Circuit Court, City of St. Louis, Missouri, B&W removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. The plaintiffs filed a motion to remand, which was granted in March 2006. In April 2008, the
court stayed the case pending U.S. Supreme Court review in Good v. Altria Group, Inc. A nominal trial date of January 10, 2011, was scheduled, but it did not proceed at that time. A status conference is scheduled for
February 3, 2014. 
 In the event RJR Tobacco and its affiliates or indemnitees lose one or more of the pending
“lights” class-action suits, RJR Tobacco could face bonding difficulties depending upon the amount of damages ordered, if any, which could have a material adverse effect on RJR Tobacco’s, and consequently RAI’s, results of
operations, cash flows or financial position. 
 Other Class Actions. In Young v. American Tobacco Co.,
Inc., a case filed in November 1997 in Circuit Court, Orleans Parish, Louisiana, the plaintiffs brought an ETS class action against U.S. cigarette manufacturers, including RJR Tobacco and B&W, and parent companies of U.S. cigarette
manufacturers, including RJR, on behalf of all residents of Louisiana who, though not themselves cigarette smokers, have been exposed to secondhand smoke from cigarettes which were manufactured by the defendants, and who allegedly suffered injury as
a result of that exposure. The plaintiffs seek to recover an unspecified amount of compensatory and punitive damages. In March 2013, the court entered an order staying the case, including all discovery, pending the implementation of the smoking
cessation program ordered by the court in Scott v. The American Tobacco Co. 
 In Parsons v. A C &
S, Inc., a case filed in February 1998 in Circuit Court, Ohio County, West Virginia, the plaintiff sued asbestos manufacturers, U.S. cigarette manufacturers, including RJR Tobacco and B&W, and parent companies of U.S. cigarette
manufacturers, including RJR, seeking to recover $1 million in compensatory and punitive damages individually and an unspecified amount for the class in both compensatory and punitive damages. The class was brought on behalf of persons who
allegedly have personal injury claims arising from their exposure to respirable asbestos fibers and cigarette smoke. The plaintiffs allege that Mrs. Parsons’ use of tobacco products and exposure to asbestos products caused her to develop
lung cancer and to become addicted to tobacco. In December 2000, three defendants, Nitral Liquidators, Inc., Desseaux Corporation of North American and Armstrong World Industries, filed bankruptcy petitions in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware, In re Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Pursuant to section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, Parsons is automatically stayed with respect to all defendants. 

Finally, in Jones v. American Tobacco Co., Inc., a case filed in December 1998 in Circuit Court, Jackson County,
Missouri, the defendants removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri in February 1999. The action was brought against the major U.S. cigarette manufacturers, including RJR Tobacco and B&W, and
parent companies of U.S. cigarette manufacturers, including RJR, by tobacco product users and 

  
 27 








 
purchasers on behalf of all similarly situated Missouri consumers. The plaintiffs allege that their use of the defendants’ tobacco products has caused them to become addicted to nicotine.
The plaintiffs seek to recover an unspecified amount of compensatory and punitive damages. The case was remanded to the Circuit Court in February 1999. There is currently no activity in this case. 

Health-Care Cost Recovery Cases 

Health-care cost recovery cases have been brought by a variety of plaintiffs. Other than certain governmental actions, these
cases largely have been unsuccessful on remoteness grounds, which means that one who pays an injured person’s medical expenses is legally too remote to maintain an action against the person allegedly responsible for the injury. 

As of September 30, 2013, two health-care cost recovery cases were pending in the United States against RJR Tobacco,
B&W, as its indemnitee, or both, as discussed below after the discussion of the State Settlement Agreements. A limited number of claimants have filed suit against RJR Tobacco, its current or former affiliates, B&W and other tobacco industry
defendants to recover funds for health care, medical and other assistance paid by foreign provincial governments in treating their citizens. For additional information on these cases, see “— International Cases” below. 

State Settlement Agreements. In June 1994, the Mississippi Attorney General brought an action, Moore v.
American Tobacco Co., against various industry members, including RJR Tobacco and B&W. This case was brought on behalf of the state to recover state funds paid for health care and other assistance to state citizens suffering from diseases
and conditions allegedly related to tobacco use. Most other states, through their attorneys general or other state agencies, sued RJR Tobacco, B&W and other U.S. cigarette manufacturers based on similar theories. The cigarette manufacturer
defendants, including RJR Tobacco and B&W, settled the first four of these cases scheduled for trial — Mississippi, Florida, Texas and Minnesota — by separate agreements with each such state. 

On November 23, 1998, the major U.S. cigarette manufacturers, including RJR Tobacco and B&W, entered into the
Master Settlement Agreement with attorneys general representing the remaining 46 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa and the Northern Marianas. Effective on November 12, 1999, the MSA
settled all the health-care cost recovery actions brought by, or on behalf of, the settling jurisdictions and released various additional present and future claims. 

In the settling jurisdictions, the MSA released RJR Tobacco, B&W, and their affiliates and indemnitees, including RAI,
from: 
  

	 	•	 	 all claims of the settling states and their respective political subdivisions and other recipients of state health-care funds, relating to past
conduct arising out of the use, sale, distribution, manufacture, development, advertising, marketing or health effects of, the exposure to, or research, statements or warnings about, tobacco products; and 



 

	 	•	 	 all monetary claims of the settling states and their respective political subdivisions and other recipients of state health-care funds, relating to
future conduct arising out of the use of or exposure to, tobacco products that have been manufactured in the ordinary course of business. 



  
 28 








 Set forth below are tables depicting the unadjusted tobacco industry settlement
payment schedule and the settlement payment schedule for RAI’s operating subsidiaries under the State Settlement Agreements, and related information for 2011 and beyond: 

Unadjusted Original Participating Manufacturers’ Settlement Payment Schedule 

 

																													
	 	  	2011	 	  	2012	 	  	2013	 	  	2014	 	  	2015 - 2016	 	  	2017	 	  	Thereafter	 
	 First Four States’ Settlements:(1)
	  				  				  				  				  				  				  			
	 Mississippi Annual Payment
	  	$	136	  	  	$	136	  	  	$	136	  	  	$	136	  	  	$	136	  	  	$	136	  	  	$	136	  
	 Florida Annual Payment
	  	 	440	  	  	 	440	  	  	 	440	  	  	 	440	  	  	 	440	  	  	 	440	  	  	 	440	  
	 Texas Annual Payment
	  	 	580	  	  	 	580	  	  	 	580	  	  	 	580	  	  	 	580	  	  	 	580	  	  	 	580	  
	 Minnesota Annual Payment
	  	 	204	  	  	 	204	  	  	 	204	  	  	 	204	  	  	 	204	  	  	 	204	  	  	 	204	  
	 Remaining Jurisdictions’ Settlement:
	  				  				  				  				  				  				  			
	 Annual Payments(1)
	  	 	8,004	  	  	 	8,004	  	  	 	8,004	  	  	 	8,004	  	  	 	8,004	  	  	 	8,004	  	  	 	8,004	  
		  	  
	  
	 	  	  
	  
	 	  	  
	  
	 	  	  
	  
	 	  	  
	  
	 	  	  
	  
	 	  	  
	  
	 
	 Total
	  	$	9,364	  	  	$	9,364	  	  	$	9,364	  	  	$	9,364	  	  	$	9,364	  	  	$	9,364	  	  	$	9,364	  
		  	  
	  
	 	  	  
	  
	 	  	  
	  
	 	  	  
	  
	 	  	  
	  
	 	  	  
	  
	 	  	  
	  
	 
	
	RAI’s Operating Subsidiaries’ Settlement Expenses and Payment Schedule	 
								
	 Settlement expenses
	  	$	2,435	  	  	$	2,370	  	  	 	—  	  	  	 	—  	  	  	 	—  	  	  	 	—  	  	  	 	—  	  
	 Settlement cash payments
	  	$	2,492	  	  	$	2,414	  	  	 	—  	  	  	 	—  	  	  	 	—  	  	  	 	—  	  	  	 	—  	  
	 Projected settlement expenses
	  				  				  	$	>1,800	  	  	$	>1,900	  	  	$	>1,900	  	  	$	>2,000	  	  	$	>2,000	  
	 Projected settlement cash payments
	  				  				  	$	>2,500	  	  	$	>2,000	  	  	$	>1,900	  	  	$	>1,900	  	  	$	>2,000	  

  

	(1)	 Subject to adjustments for changes in sales volume, inflation and other factors. All payments
are to be allocated among the companies on the basis of relative market share. For further information, see “— State Settlement Agreements—Enforcement and Validity; Adjustments” below. 



The State Settlement Agreements also contain provisions restricting the marketing of tobacco products. Among these provisions
are restrictions or prohibitions on the use of cartoon characters, brand-name sponsorships, apparel and other merchandise, outdoor and transit advertising, payments for product placement, free sampling and lobbying. Furthermore, the State Settlement
Agreements required the dissolution of three industry-sponsored research and trade organizations. 
 The State Settlement
Agreements have materially adversely affected RJR Tobacco’s shipment volumes. RAI believes that these settlement obligations may materially adversely affect the results of operations, cash flows or financial position of RAI and RJR Tobacco in
future periods. The degree of the adverse impact will depend, among other things, on the rate of decline in U.S. cigarette sales in the premium and value categories, RJR Tobacco’s share of the domestic premium and value cigarette
categories, and the effect of any resulting cost advantage of manufacturers not subject to the State Settlement Agreements. 

U.S. Department of Justice Case. On September 22, 1999, in United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.,
the U.S. Department of Justice brought an action against RJR Tobacco, B&W and other tobacco companies in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The government initially sought to recover federal funds expended by the
federal government in providing health care to smokers who developed diseases and injuries alleged to be smoking-related, based on several federal statutes. In addition, the government sought, pursuant to the civil provisions of RICO, disgorgement
of profits the government contends were earned as a consequence of a RICO racketeering “enterprise.” In September 2000, the court dismissed the government’s claims asserted under the Medical Care Recovery Act as well as those under
the Medicare Secondary Payer provisions of the Social Security Act, but did not dismiss the RICO claims. In February 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that disgorgement is not an available remedy in this case.
The government’s petition for writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court was denied in October 2005. The non-jury, bench trial began in September 2004, and closing arguments concluded in June 2005. 

On August 17, 2006, the court found certain defendants, including RJR Tobacco and B&W, liable for the RICO claims,
but did not impose any direct financial penalties. The court instead enjoined the defendants from committing future racketeering acts, participating in certain trade organizations, making misrepresentations concerning smoking and health and youth
marketing, and using certain brand descriptors such as “low tar,” “light,” “ultra light,” “mild” and “natural.” The court also ordered defendants to issue “corrective communications” on
five subjects, including smoking and health and addiction, and to comply with further undertakings, including maintaining web sites of historical corporate documents and disseminating certain marketing information on a confidential basis to the
government. In addition, the court placed restrictions on the ability of the defendants to dispose of certain assets for use in the United States, unless the transferee agrees to abide by the terms of the court’s order, and ordered the
defendants to reimburse the U.S. Department of Justice its taxable costs incurred in connection with the case. 

  
 29 








 Certain defendants, including RJR Tobacco, filed notices of appeal to the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in September 2006. The government filed its notice of appeal in October 2006. In addition, the defendants, including RJR Tobacco, filed joint motions asking the district court to
clarify and to stay its order pending the defendants’ appeal. On September 28, 2006, the district court denied the defendants’ motion to stay. On September 29, 2006, the defendants, including RJR Tobacco, filed a motion asking
the court of appeals to stay the district court’s order pending the defendants’ appeal. The court granted the motion in October 2006. 

In November 2006, the court of appeals stayed the appeals pending the trial court’s ruling on the defendants’
motion for clarification. The defendants’ motion was granted in part and denied in part. The defendants’ motion as to the meaning and applicability of the general injunctive relief of the August 2006 order was denied. The request for
clarification as to the scope of the provisions in the order prohibiting the use of descriptors and requiring corrective statements at retail point of sale was granted. The court also ruled that the provisions prohibiting the use of express or
implied health messages or descriptors do apply to the actions of the defendants taken outside of the United States. 
 In
May 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals largely affirmed the finding of liability against the tobacco defendants and remanded to the trial court for dismissal of the trade organizations. The court also largely affirmed the remedial order,
including the denial of additional remedies, but vacated the order and remanded for further proceedings as to the following four discrete issues: 
  

	 	•	 	 the issue of the extent of Brown & Williamson Holdings Inc.’s control over tobacco operations was remanded for further fact finding
and clarification; 


  

	 	•	 	 the remedial order was vacated to the extent that it binds all defendants’ subsidiaries and was remanded to the lower court for determination
as to whether inclusion of the subsidiaries and which of the subsidiaries satisfy Rule 65(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 


  

	 	•	 	 the court held that the provision found in paragraph four of the injunction, concerning the use of any express or implied health message or health
descriptor for any cigarette brand, should not be read to govern overseas sales. The issue was remanded to the lower court with instructions to reformulate it so as to exempt foreign activities that have no substantial, direct and foreseeable
domestic effects; and 


  

	 	•	 	 the remedial order was vacated regarding “point of sale” displays and remanded for the district court to evaluate and make due provisions
for the rights of innocent persons, either by abandoning this part of the remedial order or re-crafting a new version reflecting the rights of third parties. 



RJR Tobacco and the other defendants, as well as the Department of Justice, filed petitions for writ of certiorari to the U.S.
Supreme Court in February 2010. In June 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the parties’ petitions for writ of certiorari. 

Post-remand proceedings are underway to determine the extent to which the original order will be implemented. On
December 22, 2010, the trial court dismissed Brown & Williamson Holdings, Inc. from the litigation. On March 3, 2011, the defendants filed a motion for vacatur, in which they moved to vacate the trial court’s injunctions and
factual findings and dismiss the case in its entirety. The court denied the motion on June 1, 2011. The defendants filed a notice of appeal. In addition, the parties to the lawsuit entered into an agreement concerning certain technical
obligations regarding their public websites. Pursuant to this agreement, RJR Tobacco agreed to deposit $3.125 million over three years into the registry of the district court. In July 2012, the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed the
trial court’s denial of the defendants’ motion to vacate the injunctions. In November 2012, the trial court entered an order wherein the court determined the language to be included in the text of the corrective statements and directed the
parties to engage in discussions with the Special Master to implement them. The defendants filed a notice of appeal on January 25, 2013. In February 2013, the appellate court granted the defendants’ motion to hold the case in abeyance
pending the District Court’s resolution of corrective statement implementation issues. The mediation process on implementation issues is ongoing. 

Native American Tribe Case. As of September 30, 2013, one Native American tribe case was pending before a
tribal court against RJR Tobacco and B&W, Crow Creek Sioux Tribe v. American Tobacco Co., a case filed in September 1997 in Tribal Court, Crow Creek Sioux, South Dakota. The plaintiffs seek to recover actual and punitive


  
 30 








 
damages, restitution, funding of a clinical cessation program, funding of a corrective public education program, and disgorgement of unjust profits from sales to minors. The plaintiffs claim that
the defendants are liable under the following theories: unlawful marketing and targeting of minors, contributing to the delinquency of minors, unfair and deceptive acts or practices, unreasonable restraint of trade and unfair method of competition,
negligence, negligence per se, conspiracy and restitution of unjust enrichment. The case is dormant. 
 International
Cases. Nine health-care reimbursement cases have been filed against RJR Tobacco, its current or former affiliates, or B&W outside the United States, by nine Canadian provinces. The remaining Canadian province, the Province of Nova
Scotia, has indicated an intention to file a similar case. In these actions, foreign governments are seeking to recover for health care, medical and other assistance paid and to be paid in treating their citizens for tobacco-related disease. No such
actions are pending in the United States. Pursuant to the terms of the 1999 sale of RJR Tobacco’s international tobacco business, RJR Tobacco has tendered the defense of these actions to JTI. Subject to a reservation of rights, JTI has assumed
the defense of RJR Tobacco and its current or former affiliates. 
  

	 	•	 	 British Columbia—In 1997, British Columbia enacted a statute, subsequently amended, which created a civil cause of action for the
government to recover the costs of health-care benefits incurred for insured populations of British Columbia residents resulting from tobacco-related disease. An action brought on behalf of the Province of British Columbia pursuant to the statute
against Canadian and non-Canadian tobacco-related entities, including RJR Tobacco and certain of its affiliates, was dismissed in February 2000 when the British Columbia Supreme Court ruled that the legislation was unconstitutional and set aside
service ex juris against the foreign defendants for that reason. British Columbia then enacted a revised statute, pursuant to which an action was filed in January 2001 against many of the same defendants, including RJR Tobacco and one of its
affiliates, in Supreme Court, British Columbia. In that action, the British Columbia government seeks to recover the present value of its total expenditures for health-care benefits provided for insured persons resulting from tobacco-related disease
or the risk of tobacco-related disease caused by alleged breaches of duty by the manufacturers, the present value of its estimated total expenditures for health-care benefits that reasonably could be expected to be provided for those insured persons
resulting from tobacco-related disease or the risk of tobacco-related disease in the future, court ordered interest, and costs, or in the alternative, special or increased costs. The government alleges that the defendants are liable under the
British Columbia statute by reason of their “tobacco related wrongs,” which are alleged to include: selling defective products, failure to warn, sale of cigarettes to children and adolescents, strict liability, deceit and
misrepresentation, violation of trade practice and competition acts, concerted action, and joint liability. RJR Tobacco and its affiliate filed statements of defense in January 2007. In February 2010, the trial date was adjourned, and no new date
has been set. Pretrial discovery is ongoing. 


  

	 	•	 	 New Brunswick—In March 2008, a case was filed on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of New Brunswick,
Canada, against Canadian and non-Canadian tobacco-related entities, including RJR Tobacco’s predecessor and one of RJR Tobacco’s affiliates, in the Trial Division in the Court of Queen’s Bench of New Brunswick. The claim is brought
pursuant to New Brunswick legislation enacted in 2008, which legislation is substantially similar to the revised British Columbia statute described above. In this action, the New Brunswick government seeks to recover essentially the same types of
damages that are being sought in the British Columbia action described above based on analogous theories of liability. RJR Tobacco and its affiliate filed statements of defense in March 2010. Pretrial discovery is ongoing. 



 

	 	•	 	 Ontario—In September 2009, a case was filed on behalf of the Province of Ontario, Canada, against Canadian and non-Canadian
tobacco-related entities, including RJR Tobacco and one of its affiliates, in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. The claim is brought pursuant to Ontario legislation enacted in 2009, which legislation is substantially similar to the revised
British Columbia statute described above. In this action, the Ontario government seeks to recover essentially the same types of damages that are being sought in the British Columbia and New Brunswick actions described above based on analogous
theories of liability, although the government also asserted claims based on the illegal importation of cigarettes, which claims were deleted in an amended statement of claim filed in August 2010. The jurisdictional challenge brought by RJR Tobacco
and its affiliate was denied by the motions court on January 4, 2012, and by the Court of Appeal on May 30, 2013. An application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada has been filed. 



  
 31 









	 	•	 	 Newfoundland and Labrador—In February 2011, a case was filed on behalf of the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada against
Canadian and non-Canadian tobacco-related entities, including RJR Tobacco and one of its affiliates, in the General Trial Division of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador. The claim is brought pursuant to legislation passed in Newfoundland
in 2001 and proclaimed in February 2011, which legislation is substantially similar to the revised British Columbia statute described above. In this action, the Newfoundland government seeks to recover essentially the same types of damages that are
being sought in the British Columbia and other provincial actions described above based on analogous theories of liability. RJR Tobacco and its affiliate have brought a motion challenging the jurisdiction of the Newfoundland court. A decision is
pending. 


  

	 	•	 	 Quebec—In June 2012, a case was filed on behalf of the Province of Quebec, Canada, against Canadian and non-Canadian tobacco-related
entities, including RJR Tobacco and one of its affiliates, in the Superior Court of the Province of Quebec, District of Montreal. The claim is brought pursuant to legislation enacted in Quebec in 2009, which legislation is substantially similar to
the revised British Columbia statute described above. In this action, the Quebec government seeks to recover essentially the same types of damages that are being sought in the British Columbia and other provincial actions described above based on
analogous theories of liability. RJR Tobacco and its affiliate have brought a motion challenging the jurisdiction of the Quebec court, which was dismissed on July 4, 2013. An application to appeal to the Quebec Court of Appeal has been filed.
Separately, in August 2009, certain Canadian manufacturers filed a constitutional challenge to the Quebec statute, and that challenge is pending. 


  

	 	•	 	 Manitoba—In May 2012, a case was filed on behalf of the Province of Manitoba, Canada, against Canadian and non-Canadian tobacco-related
entities, including RJR Tobacco and one of its affiliates, in the Court of Queen’s Bench, Winnipeg Judicial Centre, Manitoba. The claim is brought pursuant to legislation assented to in 2006 and proclaimed in 2012, which legislation is
substantially similar to the revised British Columbia statute described above. In this action, the Manitoba government seeks to recover essentially the same types of damages that are being sought in the British Columbia and other provincial actions
described above based on analogous theories of liability. RJR Tobacco and its affiliate have brought a motion challenging the jurisdiction of the Manitoba court. 



 

	 	•	 	 Saskatchewan—In June 2012, a case was filed on behalf of the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada, against Canadian and non-Canadian
tobacco-related entities, including RJR Tobacco and one of its affiliates, in the Court of Queen’s Bench, Judicial Centre of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. The claim is brought pursuant to legislation assented to in 2007 and proclaimed in 2012, which
legislation is substantially similar to the revised British Columbia statute described above. In this action, the Saskatchewan government seeks to recover essentially the same types of damages that are being sought in the British Columbia and other
provincial actions described above based on analogous theories of liability. RJR Tobacco and its affiliate have brought a motion challenging the jurisdiction of the Saskatchewan court, which was dismissed on October 1, 2013.



  

	 	•	 	 Alberta—In June 2012, a case was filed on behalf of the Province of Alberta, Canada, against Canadian and non-Canadian tobacco-related
entities, including RJR Tobacco and one of its affiliates, in the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta Judicial Centre, Calgary, Alberta. The claim is brought pursuant to legislation assented to in 2009 and proclaimed in 2012, which legislation is
substantially similar to the revised British Columbia statute described above. In this action, the Alberta government seeks to recover essentially the same types of damages that are being sought in the British Columbia and other provincial actions
described above based on analogous theories of liability. RJR Tobacco and its affiliate have been served with the claim. 



  
 32 









	 	•	 	 Prince Edward Island—In September 2012, a case was filed on behalf of the Province of Prince Edward Island, Canada, against Canadian
and non-Canadian tobacco-related entities, including RJR Tobacco and one of its affiliates, in the Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island (General Section), Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island. The claim is brought pursuant to legislation assented to
in 2009 and proclaimed in 2012, which legislation is substantially similar to the revised British Columbia statute described above. In this action, the Prince Edward Island government seeks to recover essentially the same types of damages that are
being sought in the British Columbia and other provincial actions described above based on analogous theories of liability. RJR Tobacco and its affiliate have brought a motion challenging the jurisdiction of the Prince Edward Island court.



 The following seven putative Canadian class actions were filed against various Canadian and
non-Canadian tobacco-related entities, including RJR Tobacco and one of its affiliates, in courts in the Provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, Ontario and Saskatchewan, although the plaintiffs’ counsel have been
actively pursuing only the action pending in British Columbia at this time: 
  

	 	•	 	 In Adams v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers’ Council, a case filed in July 2009 in the Court of Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan
against Canadian and non-Canadian tobacco-related entities, including RJR Tobacco and one of its affiliates, the plaintiffs brought the case on behalf of all individuals who were alive on July 10, 2009, and who have suffered, or who currently
suffer, from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, heart disease or cancer, after having smoked a minimum of 25,000 cigarettes designed, manufactured, imported, marketed or distributed by the defendants. RJR Tobacco and its affiliate
have brought a motion challenging the jurisdiction of the Saskatchewan court. 


  

	 	•	 	 In Dorion v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers’ Council, a case filed in June 2009, in the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta against
Canadian and non-Canadian tobacco-related entities, including RJR Tobacco and one of its affiliates, the plaintiffs brought the case on behalf of all individuals, including their estates, dependents and family members, who purchased or smoked
cigarettes designed, manufactured, marketed or distributed by the defendants. 


  

	 	•	 	 In Kunka v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers’ Council, a case filed in 2009 in the Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba against
Canadian and non-Canadian tobacco-related entities, including RJR Tobacco and one of its affiliates, the plaintiffs brought the case on behalf of all individuals, including their estates, and their dependents and family members, who purchased or
smoked cigarettes manufactured by the defendants. 


  

	 	•	 	 In Semple v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers’ Council, a case filed in June 2009 in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia against Canadian
and non-Canadian tobacco-related entities, including RJR Tobacco and one of its affiliates, the plaintiffs brought the case on behalf of all individuals, including their estates, dependents and family members, who purchased or smoked cigarettes
designed, manufactured, marketed or distributed by the defendants for the period of January 1, 1954, to the expiry of the opt out period as set by the court. 



 

	 	•	 	 In Bourassa v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, a case filed in June 2010 in the Supreme Court of British Columbia against Canadian and
non-Canadian tobacco-related entities, including RJR Tobacco and one of its affiliates, the plaintiffs brought the case on behalf of all individuals, including their estates, who were alive on June 12, 2007, and who have suffered, or who
currently suffer from chronic respiratory diseases, after having smoked a minimum of 25,000 cigarettes designed, manufactured, imported, marketed, or distributed by the defendants. RJR Tobacco and its affiliate have filed a challenge to the
jurisdiction of the British Columbia court. The plaintiff filed a motion for certification in April 2012, and filed affidavits in support in August 2013. 


  

	 	•	 	 In McDermid v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, a case filed in June 2010 in the Supreme Court of British Columbia against Canadian and
non-Canadian tobacco-related entities, including RJR Tobacco and one of its affiliates, the plaintiffs brought the case on behalf of all individuals, including their estates, who were alive on June 12, 2007, and who have suffered, or who
currently suffer from heart disease, after having smoked a minimum of 25,000 cigarettes designed, manufactured, imported, marketed, or distributed by the defendants. RJR Tobacco and its affiliate have filed a challenge to the jurisdiction of the
British Columbia court. 



  
 33 









	 	•	 	 In Jacklin v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers’ Council, a case filed in June 2012 in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice against
Canadian and non-Canadian tobacco-related entities, including RJR Tobacco and one of its affiliates, the plaintiffs brought the case on behalf of all individuals, including their estates, who were alive on June 12, 2007, and who have suffered,
or who currently suffer from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, or cancer, after having smoked a minimum of 25,000 cigarettes designed, manufactured, imported, marketed, or distributed by the defendants. 



In each of these seven cases, the plaintiffs allege fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of warranty, breach of warranty of
merchantability and of fitness for a particular purpose, failure to warn, design defects, negligence, breach of a “special duty” to children and adolescents, conspiracy, concert of action, unjust enrichment, market share liability, joint
liability, and violations of various trade practices and competition statutes. The plaintiffs seek compensatory and aggravated damages; punitive or exemplary damages; the right to waive the torts described above and claim disgorgement of the amount
of revenues or profits the defendants received from the sale of tobacco products to putative class members; interest pursuant to the Pre-judgment Interest Act and other similar legislation; and other relief the court deems just. Pursuant to the
terms of the 1999 sale of RJR Tobacco’s international tobacco business, RJR Tobacco has tendered the defense of these seven actions to JTI. Subject to a reservation of rights, JTI has assumed the defense of RJR Tobacco and its current or former
affiliates in these actions. 
 State Settlement Agreements—Enforcement and Validity; Adjustments 

As of September 30, 2013, there were 31 cases concerning the enforcement, validity or interpretation of the State
Settlement Agreements in which RJR Tobacco or B&W is a party. This number includes those cases, discussed below, relating to disputed payments under the State Settlement Agreements. 

The Vermont Attorney General filed suit in July 2005, in the Vermont Superior Court, Chittenden County, alleging that certain
advertising for the Eclipse cigarette brand violated both the MSA and the Vermont Consumer Fraud Statute. The State of Vermont sought declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief. The bench trial in this action began on October 6, 2008, and
lasted a total of five weeks. Closing arguments occurred on March 11, 2009. On March 10, 2010, the court issued its opinion, finding that three of the advertising claims made by RJR Tobacco were not supported by the appropriate degree of
scientific evidence. The court did, however, rule that the remaining six advertising claims challenged by the State of Vermont were not actionable. The court indicated that remedies and any damages to be awarded, as well as the issue of
attorney’s fees and litigation expenses, will be addressed in additional proceedings. On March 22, 2010, RJR Tobacco filed a motion to amend findings of fact that it believed were demonstrably contrary to, or unsupported by, the record. On
December 14, 2010, the court issued an order granting in part and denying in part RJR Tobacco’s motion. The parties conducted a mediation on the remaining issues on February 14, 2012, but failed to reach an agreement. On June 3,
2013, the court awarded $8.3 million in civil penalties and entered a permanent injunction against RJR Tobacco imposing certain limits on the “marketing, distributing, selling, promoting or advertising” within Vermont of any
“non-traditional cigarette” or “potentially reduced exposure product”, referred to as PREP, with reduced risk claims, absent certain studies in support. In August 2013, the court clarified its order, ruling that the injunction
applied to only non-traditional cigarettes containing tobacco and does not impact either smokeless tobacco products or PREPs generally. RJR Tobacco filed a notice of appeal on September 5, 2013. On September 18, 2013, Vermont filed a
notice of cross appeal. 
 In April 2005, the Mississippi Attorney General notified B&W of its intent to seek
approximately $3.9 million in additional payments under the Mississippi Settlement Agreement. The Mississippi Attorney General asserts that B&W failed to report in its net operating profit or its shipments, cigarettes manufactured by
B&W under contract for Star Tobacco or its parent, Star Scientific, Inc. B&W advised the State that it did not owe the state any money. In August 2005, the Mississippi Attorney General filed in the Chancery Court of Jackson County,
Mississippi, a Notice of Violation, Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement, and Request for an Accounting by Defendant Brown & Williamson Holdings, Inc., formerly known as Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation. In this filing,
Mississippi estimated that its damages exceeded $5.0 million. On August 24, 2011, the court entered an order finding in favor of the State on the Star contract manufacturing issue, that the total amount of the underpayment


  
 34 








 
from B&W was approximately $3.8 million and that interest on the underpayment was approximately $4.3 million. The court also appointed a special master to undertake an accounting of the
benefit received by B&W for failure to include its profits from Star contract manufacturing in its net operating profits reported to the State. Finally, the court awarded the State attorneys’ fees and costs in an amount to be determined.
B&W filed a motion to certify the Star contract issue for interlocutory appeal, pursuant to Rule 54 (b) of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure. On January 9, 2012, that motion was denied. 

In addition, in February 2010, the Mississippi Attorney General filed a motion alleging that RJR Tobacco had improperly failed
to report shipments of certain categories of cigarette volumes, and for certain years had improperly reported its net operating profit. As a result, the State alleges that settlement payments to it were improperly reduced. RJR Tobacco disputes these
allegations and is vigorously defending against them. Hearings on these issues were held on January 24-25, 2012, and May 9, 2012. On May 15, 2012, the court entered an order finding in favor of RJR Tobacco on the claim related to RJR
Tobacco’s reported net operating profits in the year used as a baseline for future calculations of the State’s net operating profits payment. The State had sought $3.8 million in damages for this issue, with an additional $2.7 million in
interest. On June 19, 2012, the court entered an order finding in favor of the State on the remaining issues, holding that the total amount of the underpayment was approximately $3.3 million and that interest on the underpayment was also
approximately $3.3 million, though the court also held that this amount should be offset by additional payments previously made by Lorillard Tobacco Company on some of these issues. The court further ordered RJR Tobacco to perform an accounting of
its profits and shipments from 1999-2011. Finally, the court awarded the State attorneys’ fees and costs in an amount to be determined. On July 10, 2012, RJR Tobacco filed a petition with the Mississippi Supreme Court requesting leave to
immediately appeal the court’s ordered accounting and its entry of judgment for the State without first conducting an evidentiary hearing. On August 15, 2012, the request was denied. An independent accountant acceptable to both the State
and RJR Tobacco was identified and retained. On August 8, 2013, the final report of the independent accountant was filed with the court. 

In May 2006, the State of Florida filed a motion, in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm
Beach County, Florida, to enforce the Settlement Agreement, for an Accounting by Brown & Williamson Holdings, Inc., and for an Order of Contempt, raising substantially the same issues as raised by the Mississippi Attorney General and
seeking approximately $12.4 million in additional payments under the Florida Settlement Agreement, as well as $17.0 million in interest payments. This matter is currently in the discovery phase. 

NPM Adjustment Claims. The MSA includes an adjustment that potentially reduces the annual payment obligations of
RJR Tobacco and the other PMs. Certain requirements, collectively referred to as the Adjustment Requirements, must be satisfied before the NPM Adjustment for a given year is available: 

 

	 	•	 	 an independent auditor designated under the MSA, referred to as the Independent Auditor, must determine that the PMs have experienced a market
share loss beyond a triggering threshold to those manufacturers that do not participate in the MSA, such non-participating manufacturers referred to as NPMs; and 



 

	 	•	 	 in a binding arbitration proceeding, a firm of independent economic consultants must find that the disadvantages of the MSA were a significant
factor contributing to the loss. This finding is known as a significant factor determination. 


 When the
Adjustment Requirements are satisfied, the MSA provides that the NPM Adjustment applies to reduce the annual payment obligation of the PMs. However, an individual settling state may avoid its share of the NPM Adjustment if it had in place and
diligently enforced during the entirety of the relevant year a “Qualifying Statute” that imposes escrow obligations on NPMs that are comparable to what the NPMs would have owed if they had joined the MSA. In such event, the state’s
share of the NPM Adjustment is reallocated to other settling states, if any, that did not have in place and diligently enforce a Qualifying Statute. 

NPM Adjustment Claim for 2003. For 2003, the Adjustment Requirements were satisfied. As a result, in
April 2006, RJR Tobacco placed approximately $647 million of its MSA payment into a disputed payments account, in accordance with a procedure established by the MSA. That amount represented RJR Tobacco’s share of the 2003


  
 35 








 
NPM Adjustment as calculated by the Independent Auditor. In March 2007, the Independent Auditor issued revised calculations that reduced RJR Tobacco’s share of the NPM Adjustment for
2003 to approximately $615 million. As a result, in April 2007, RJR Tobacco instructed the Independent Auditor to release to the settling states approximately $32 million from the disputed payments account. 

Following RJR Tobacco’s payment of a portion of its 2006 MSA payment into the disputed payments account, 37 of the
settling states filed legal proceedings in their respective MSA courts seeking declaratory orders that they diligently enforced their Qualifying Statutes during 2003 and/or orders compelling RJR Tobacco and the other PMs that placed money in the
disputed payments account to pay the disputed amounts to the settling states. In response, RJR Tobacco and other PMs, pursuant to the MSA’s arbitration provisions, moved to compel arbitration of the parties’ dispute concerning the 2003 NPM
Adjustment, including the States’ diligent enforcement claims, before an arbitration panel consisting of three retired federal court judges. The settling states opposed these motions, arguing, among other things, that the issue of diligent
enforcement must be resolved by MSA courts in each of the 52 settling states and territories. 
 As of September 30,
2013, 47 of the 48 courts that had addressed the question whether the dispute concerning the 2003 NPM Adjustment is arbitrable had ruled that arbitration is required under the MSA. The Montana Supreme Court ruled that the state of Montana did not
agree to arbitrate the question of whether it diligently enforced a qualifying statute. Subsequently, Montana and the PMs reached an agreement whereby the PMs agreed not to contest Montana’s claim that it diligently enforced the Qualifying
Statute during 2003. 
 In January 2009, RJR Tobacco and certain other PMs entered into an Agreement Regarding
Arbitration, referred to as the Arbitration Agreement, with 45 of the MSA settling states (representing approximately 90% of the allocable share of the settling states) pursuant to which those states agreed to participate in a multistate arbitration
of issues related to the 2003 NPM Adjustment. Under the Arbitration Agreement, the signing states will have their ultimate liability (if any) with respect to the 2003 NPM Adjustment reduced by 20%, and RJR Tobacco and the other PMs that placed their
share of the disputed 2005 NPM Adjustment (discussed below) into the disputed payments account, without releasing or waiving any claims, authorized the release of those funds to the settling states. 

The arbitration panel contemplated by the MSA and the Arbitration Agreement, referred to as the Arbitration Panel, was
selected, and proceedings before the panel with respect to the 2003 NPM Adjustment claim began in July 2010. Following the completion of document and deposition discovery, on November 3, 2011, RJR Tobacco and the other PMs advised the
Arbitration Panel that they were not contesting the “diligent enforcement” of 12 states and the four Pacific territories with a combined allocable share of less than 14%. The “diligent enforcement” of the remaining 33 settling
states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico was contested and has been the subject of further proceedings. A common issues hearing was held in April 2012, and state specific evidentiary hearings with respect to the contested states were
initiated. 
 As a result of the Award, as described in more detail below, as well as the earlier decisions not to contest
the diligent enforcement of 12 states and the four Pacific territories, only 15 contested settling states required state specific diligent enforcement rulings. State specific evidentiary hearings were completed as of the end of May 2013. On
September 11, 2013, the Arbitration Panel issued rulings with respect to the 15 remaining contested states. The Arbitration Panel ruled that six states (representing approximately 14.68% Allocable Share) – Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland,
Missouri, New Mexico and Pennsylvania – had not diligently enforced their Qualifying Statutes in 2003. As a result of these rulings, RJR Tobacco is entitled to the maximum remaining amount with respect to its 2003 NPM Adjustment claim. 

Other NPM Adjustment Claims. From 2006 to 2008, proceedings (including significant factor arbitrations before an
independent economic consulting firm) were initiated with respect to the NPM Adjustment for 2004, 2005 and 2006. Ultimately, the Adjustment Requirements were satisfied with respect to each of these NPM Adjustments. 

  
 36 








 In June 2009, RJR Tobacco, certain other PMs and the settling states entered
into an agreement with respect to the 2007, 2008 and 2009 significant factor determinations. This agreement provided that the settling states would not contest that the disadvantages of the MSA were “a significant factor contributing to”
the market share loss experienced by the PMs in those years. The stipulation pertaining to each of the three years covered by the agreement became effective in February of the year a final determination by the firm of independent economic
consultants would otherwise have been expected (2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively), if the issue had been arbitrated on the merits. RJR Tobacco and the PMs paid a total amount of $5 million into the States’ Antitrust/Consumer Protection
Tobacco Enforcement Fund established under Section VIII(c) of the MSA for each year covered by that agreement, with RJR Tobacco paying approximately 47% of such amounts. On January 9, 2012, a new agreement with respect to significant factor
determinations pertaining to 2010, 2011 and 2012 was entered into on terms essentially identical to the earlier agreement. 

Based on the payment calculations of the Independent Auditor and the agreement described above regarding the 2007, 2008 and
2009 significant factor determinations, the Adjustment Requirements have been satisfied with respect to the NPM Adjustments for 2007, 2008 and 2009. In addition, based on the payment calculations of the Independent Auditor and the agreement
described above regarding the 2010, 2011 and 2012 significant factor determinations, the Adjustment Requirements have been satisfied with respect to the NPM Adjustment for 2010. 

The approximate maximum principal amounts of RJR Tobacco’s share of the disputed NPM Adjustments for the years 2003
through 2010, as currently calculated by the Independent Auditor, are as follows (the amounts shown below do not include the interest or earnings thereon to which RJR Tobacco believes it would be entitled under the MSA, do not reflect the partial
liability reduction for the 2003 NPM Adjustment pursuant to the Arbitration Agreement and do not reflect any reduction as a result of the Term Sheet described below): 
  

																																	
	 Year for which NPM Adjustment calculated
	 	 	2003	  	 	 	2004	  	 	 	2005	  	 	 	2006	  	 	 	2007	  	 	 	2008	  	 	 	2009	  	 	 	2010	  
	 Year in which deduction from NPM Adjustment was taken
	 	 	2006	  	 	 	2007	  	 	 	2008	  	 	 	2009	  	 	 	2010	  	 	 	2011	  	 	 	2012	  	 	 	2013	  
	 RJR Tobacco’s approximate share of disputed NPM Adjustment (millions)
	 	$	615	  	 	$	562	  	 	$	445	  	 	$	419	  	 	$	435	  	 	$	468	  	 	$	469	  	 	$	461	  

 In addition to the NPM Adjustment claims described above, RJR Tobacco has filed dispute
notices with respect to its 2011 and 2012 annual MSA payments relating to the NPM Adjustments potentially applicable to those years. The amount at issue for those two years is approximately $841 million in the aggregate. 

Due to the uncertainty over the final resolution of the NPM Adjustment claims asserted by RJR Tobacco, no assurances can be
made related to the amounts, if any, that will be realized or any amounts (including interest) that will be owed, except as described below related to the partial settlement of certain NPM Adjustment claims. 

Partial Settlement of Certain NPM Adjustment Claims. On November 14, 2012, RJR Tobacco, certain other PMs and
certain settling states entered into a Term Sheet that sets forth terms on which accrued and potential NPM Adjustment claims for 2003 through 2014 could be resolved. The Term Sheet also sets forth a restructured NPM Adjustment process to be applied
on a going-forward basis, starting with the 2013 volume year. The Term Sheet was provided to all of the MSA settling states for their review and consideration. The Term Sheet established December 14, 2012, as the deadline by which settling
states had to indicate whether they wished to join the proposed settlement. The date the PMs and the joining settling jurisdictions would determine whether to proceed with the settlement was set as December 17, 2012. A total of 17 states, the
District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, together representing just under 42% Allocable Share, determined to join the proposed settlement. RJR Tobacco and the other PMs indicated that they were prepared to go forward with the proposed settlement with
that level of jurisdictional participation. 
 The Term Sheet provided that the Arbitration Panel currently in place to deal
with the 2003 NPM Adjustment (and other NPM Adjustment-related matters) must review the proposed settlement and enter an appropriate order to confirm for the Independent Auditor that it should implement as necessary the terms of the settlement
agreement. 

  
 37 








 On March 12, 2013, the Arbitration Panel entered a Stipulated Partial
Settlement and Award, referred to as the Award, reflecting the financial terms of the Term Sheet. On March 29, 2013, the Independent Auditor issued a notice indicating that it intended to implement the financial provisions of the Term Sheet,
and also issued various revised payment calculations pertaining to payment years 2009 through 2012 and final calculations pertaining to payment year 2013 that reflected implementation of the financial provisions of the Term Sheet. 

On April 12, 2013, Oklahoma joined the Term Sheet, bringing to 20 the total number of jurisdictions that have joined the
settlement, representing approximately 43% Allocable Share, and the Independent Auditor issued revised payment calculations reflecting the financial impact of Oklahoma’s decision to join the settlement. Subsequently, on May 24, 2013,
Connecticut and South Carolina also joined the Term Sheet bringing to 22 the total number of jurisdictions that have joined the settlement, representing approximately 46% Allocable Share. The Independent Auditor has not yet issued revised payment
calculations reflecting the financial impact of these states’ decisions to join the settlement. Efforts by two states, Colorado and Ohio, to obtain injunctions to prevent implementation of the Award were unsuccessful. 

As of September 30, 2013, 14 non-settling states have filed motions, in their respective MSA courts, to vacate and/or
modify the Award. The arbitration with respect to the 2003 NPM Adjustment will continue to its conclusion. This will include resolving the various motions to vacate and/or modify the Award, as well as any post decision challenges (if any) to the
rulings issued by the Arbitration Panel. 
 Preliminary discussions are currently underway with the 29 jurisdictions that
have not joined the Term Sheet to initiate arbitration proceedings with respect to the 2004 NPM Adjustment. 
 Other NPM
Matters. Separately, on August 19, 2011, Idaho sent a letter on behalf of itself and 31 other states, stating their intent to initiate arbitration with respect to whether amounts used to measure the domestic cigarette market and to
calculate PM payment obligations under the MSA should be the adjusted gross or the net number of cigarettes on which federal excise tax (including arbitrios de cigarillos) is paid. The parties also agreed to arbitrate the Independent Auditor’s
calculation of the volume adjustment with respect to the treatment of “roll your own,” referred to as RYO, tobacco. On January 21, 2013, the panel ruled that adjusted gross figures should be used in payment calculations and that, in
the calculation of the volume adjustment, the Independent Auditor should use 0.0325 ounces of RYO tobacco to be the equivalent of one cigarette. 

Antitrust Case 
 A number
of tobacco wholesalers and consumers have sued U.S. cigarette manufacturers, including RJR Tobacco and B&W, in federal and state courts, alleging that cigarette manufacturers combined and conspired to set the price of cigarettes in
violation of antitrust statutes and various state unfair business practices statutes. In these cases, the plaintiffs asked the court to certify the lawsuits as class actions on behalf of other persons who purchased cigarettes directly or indirectly
from one or more of the defendants. As of September 30, 2013, all of the federal and state court cases on behalf of indirect purchasers had been dismissed. 

In Smith v. Philip Morris Cos., Inc., a case filed in February 2000, and pending in District Court, Seward County,
Kansas, the court granted class certification in November 2001, in an action brought against the major U.S. cigarette manufacturers, including RJR Tobacco and B&W, and the parent companies of the major U.S. cigarette
manufacturers, including RJR, seeking to recover an unspecified amount in actual and punitive damages. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants participated in a conspiracy to fix or maintain the price of cigarettes sold in the United States. In an
opinion dated March 23, 2012, the court granted summary judgment in favor of RJR Tobacco and B&W on the plaintiffs’ claims. On July 18, 2012, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal. 

Other Litigation and Developments 

JTI Claims for Indemnification. By purchase agreement dated March 9, 1999, amended and restated as of May 11,
1999, referred to as the 1999 Purchase Agreement, RJR and RJR Tobacco sold the international tobacco business to JTI. Under the 1999 Purchase Agreement, RJR and RJR Tobacco retained certain liabilities relating to the international tobacco business
sold to JTI. Under its reading of the indemnification provisions of the 1999 Purchase Agreement, JTI has requested indemnification for damages allegedly arising out of these retained 

  
 38 








 
liabilities. As previously reported, a number of the indemnification claims between the parties relating to the activities of Northern Brands in Canada have been resolved. The other matters for
which JTI has requested indemnification for damages under the indemnification provisions of the 1999 Purchase Agreement are described below: 
  

	 	•	 	 In a letter dated March 31, 2006, counsel for JTI stated that JTI would be seeking indemnification under the 1999 Purchase Agreement for any
damages it may incur or may have incurred arising out of a Southern District of New York grand jury investigation, a now-terminated Eastern District of North Carolina grand jury investigation, and various actions filed by the European Community and
others in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, referred to as the EDNY, against RJR Tobacco and certain of its affiliates on November 3, 2000, August 6, 2001, and (as discussed in greater detail below)
October 30, 2002, and against JTI on January 11, 2002. 


  

	 	•	 	 JTI also has sought indemnification relating to a Statement of Claim filed on April 23, 2010, against JTI Macdonald Corp., referred to as
JTI-MC, by the Ontario Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers’ Marketing Board, referred to as the Board, Andy J. Jacko, Brian Baswick, Ron Kichler, and Aprad Dobrenty, proceeding on their own behalf and on behalf of a putative class of Ontario tobacco
producers that sold tobacco to JTI-MC during the period between January 1, 1986 and December 31, 1996, referred to as the Class Period, through the Board pursuant to certain agreements. The Statement of Claim seeks recovery for damages
allegedly incurred by the class representatives and the putative class for tobacco sales during the Class Period made at the contract price for duty free or export cigarettes with respect to cigarettes that, rather than being sold duty free or for
export, purportedly were sold in Canada, which allegedly breached one or more of a series of contracts dated between June 4, 1986, and July 3, 1996. A motion to dismiss has been filed. 



 

	 	•	 	 Finally, JTI has advised RJR and RJR Tobacco of its view that, under the terms of the 1999 Purchase Agreement, RJR and RJR Tobacco are liable for a
roughly $1.7 million judgment entered in 1998, plus interest and costs, in an action filed in Brazil by Lutz Hanneman, a former employee of a former RJR Tobacco subsidiary. RJR and RJR Tobacco deny that they are liable for this judgment under the
terms of the 1999 Purchase Agreement. 


 Although RJR and RJR Tobacco recognize that, under certain circumstances, they
may have these and other unresolved indemnification obligations to JTI under the 1999 Purchase Agreement, RJR and RJR Tobacco disagree with JTI as to (1) what circumstances relating to any such matters may give rise to indemnification
obligations by RJR and RJR Tobacco, and (2) the nature and extent of any such obligation. RJR and RJR Tobacco have conveyed their position to JTI, and the parties have agreed to resolve their differences at a later time. 

European Community. On October 30, 2002, the European Community and ten of its member states filed a complaint in
the EDNY against RJR, RJR Tobacco and several currently and formerly related companies. The complaint contains many of the same or similar allegations found in an earlier complaint, now dismissed, filed in August 2001 and also alleges that the
defendants, together with certain identified and unidentified persons, engaged in money laundering and other conduct violating civil RICO and a variety of common laws. The complaint also alleges that the defendants manufactured cigarettes that were
eventually sold in Iraq in violation of U.S. sanctions. The plaintiffs seek compensatory, punitive and treble damages among other types of relief. This matter had been stayed and largely inactive until November 24, 2009 when, with the
court’s permission, the European Community and member states filed and served a second amended complaint. The second amended complaint added 16 member states as plaintiffs and RAI, RJR Tobacco and R. J. Reynolds Global Products Inc., referred
to as GPI, as defendants. The allegations contained in the second amended complaint are in most respects either identical or similar to those found in the prior complaint, but now add new allegations primarily regarding the activities of RAI, RJR
Tobacco and GPI following the B&W business combination. Pursuant to a stipulation and order, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint on February 15, 2010. Ruling on part of the defendants’
motion to dismiss, on March 8, 2011, the court dismissed the plaintiffs’ RICO claims, and reserved decision as to dismissal of the plaintiffs’ state-law claims. Thereafter, on May 13, 2011, the court granted the remaining portion
of the defendants’ motion and dismissed the plaintiffs’ state-law claims based on the court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On May 16, 2011, the clerk of court entered a judgment dismissing the action in its


  
 39 








 
entirety. On June 10, 2011, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, appealing from the May 16, 2011 judgment, as well as the
March 8, 2011 and May 13, 2011 orders that respectively resulted in the dismissal of their RICO and state-law claims. Oral argument occurred on February 24, 2012. A decision is pending. 

FDA Litigation. On February 25, 2011, RJR Tobacco, Lorillard, Inc., and Lorillard Tobacco Company jointly filed a
lawsuit, Lorillard, Inc. v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, challenging the composition of the Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee, referred to as the TPSAC, which had
been established by the FDA under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. The complaint alleges that certain members of the TPSAC and certain members of its Constituents Subcommittee have financial and appearance conflicts of interest
that are disqualifying under federal ethics law and regulations, and that the TPSAC is not “fairly balanced,” as required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, referred to as FACA. In March 2011, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint,
which added an additional claim, based on a nonpublic meeting of members of the TPSAC, in violation of the FACA. The court granted the plaintiffs’ unopposed motion to file a second amended complaint adding a count addressing the FDA’s
refusal to produce all documents generated by the TPSAC and its subcommittee in preparation of the menthol report. The FDA filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. On August 1, 2012, the court denied the FDA’s motion to
dismiss. The FDA filed its answer to the complaint on October 12, 2012. The parties participated in a status conference on April 22, 2013, with Lorillard and RJR Tobacco filing an amended complaint the same day. Briefing for summary
judgment motions was completed on September 20, 2013. A decision is pending. 
 Other Matters. RJR Tobacco and
others brought suit against the City of Providence, Rhode Island challenging ordinances that prohibit the acceptance of tobacco product coupons, offering of certain pricing discounts for tobacco products, and certain flavored tobacco products in
Providence, Rhode Island. The case, National Association of Tobacco Outlets, Inc. v. City of Providence, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island on February 13, 2012. The parties filed cross motions for
summary judgment, and on December 11, 2012, the court granted judgment in favor of the defendants, except that the court modified the definition of a flavored tobacco product consistent with plaintiffs’ argument. On September 30,
2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court. 
 In Richard
Villarreal v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a case filed June 6, 2012, the plaintiff filed a collective action complaint against R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Pinstripe, Inc., and CareerBuilder, LLC, in the U.S. District Court, Northern
District of Georgia. The complaint alleges unlawful discrimination with respect to the hiring of individuals to fill entry-level regional sales positions in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (29 U.S.C. §621, et seq.).
Although the complaint is currently a single plaintiff case, the complaint seeks collective/class action status. RJR Tobacco’s and Pinstripe’s motion for partial dismissal was granted on March 6, 2013, thereby eliminating the
plaintiff’s disparate impact claim and limiting the relevant time period for both the plaintiff’s claims and potential class claims. RJR Tobacco and Pinstripe filed answers to the remaining disparate treatment claim on March 20, 2013.
Defendant CareerBuilder was dismissed with prejudice on September 25, 2012. The plaintiff filed a motion to amend the complaint on March 28, 2013, which RJR Tobacco and Pinstripe opposed. The motion has been fully briefed and the parties
are now awaiting a ruling from the court. Discovery has been stayed until 30 days after the court rules on the motion to amend. The plaintiff must wait to file a motion for class certification until 30 days after the commencement of discovery. 

Smokeless Tobacco Litigation 

As of September 30, 2013, American Snuff Co. was a defendant in six actions brought by individual plaintiffs in West
Virginia state court seeking damages in connection with personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of the usage of American Snuff Co.’s smokeless tobacco products. These actions are pending before the same West Virginia court as the 30
consolidated individual smoker cases against RJR Tobacco, B&W, as RJR Tobacco’s indemnitee, or both. Pursuant to the court’s December 3, 2001, order, the smokeless tobacco claims and defendants remain severed. 

  
 40 








 Pursuant to a second amended complaint filed in September 2006, American Snuff
Co. is a defendant in Vassallo v. United States Tobacco Company, pending in the Eleventh Circuit Court in Miami-Dade County, Florida. The individual plaintiff alleges that he sustained personal injuries, including addiction and cancer,
as a result of his use of smokeless tobacco products, allegedly including products manufactured by American Snuff Co. The plaintiff seeks unspecified compensatory and consequential damages in an amount greater than $15,000. There is no punitive
damages demand in this case, though the plaintiff retains the right to seek leave of court to add such a demand later. Discovery is underway. 

Tobacco Buyout Legislation 

In 2004, legislation was passed eliminating the U.S. Government’s tobacco production controls and price support
program. The buyout of tobacco quota holders provided for in the Fair and Equitable Tobacco Reform Act, referred to as FETRA, is funded by a direct quarterly assessment on every tobacco product manufacturer and importer, on a market-share basis
measured on volume to which federal excise tax is applied. The aggregate cost of the buyout to the industry is approximately $9.9 billion, including approximately $9.6 billion payable to quota tobacco holders and growers through industry
assessments over ten years and approximately $290 million for the liquidation of quota tobacco stock. As a result of the tobacco buyout legislation, the MSA Phase II obligations established in 1999 continued as scheduled through the end of
2010, but were offset against the tobacco quota buyout obligations. RAI’s operating subsidiaries’ annual expense under FETRA for 2013 and 2014 is estimated to be approximately $210 million and $170 million, respectively. 

RAI’s operating subsidiaries recorded the FETRA assessment on a quarterly basis as cost of goods sold. RAI’s
operating subsidiaries estimate that their overall share of the buyout will approximate $2.5 billion prior to the deduction of permitted offsets under the MSA. 

ERISA Litigation 

In May 2002, in Tatum v. The R.J.R. Pension Investment Committee of the R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Capital
Investment Plan, an employee of RJR Tobacco filed a class-action suit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, alleging that the defendants, RJR, RJR Tobacco, the RJR Employee Benefits Committee and the RJR
Pension Investment Committee, violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, referred to as ERISA. The actions about which the plaintiff complains stem from a decision made in 1999 by RJR Nabisco Holdings Corp., subsequently renamed
Nabisco Group Holdings Corp., referred to as NGH, to spin off RJR, thereby separating NGH’s tobacco business and food business. As part of the spin-off, the 401(k) plan for the previously related entities had to be divided into two separate
plans for the now separate tobacco and food businesses. The plaintiff contends that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to participants of the RJR 401(k) plan when the defendants removed the stock funds of the companies involved in the
food business, NGH and Nabisco Holdings Corp., referred to as Nabisco, as investment options from the RJR 401(k) plan approximately six months after the spin-off. The plaintiff asserts that a November 1999 amendment (the “1999 Amendment”)
that eliminated the NGH and Nabisco funds from the RJR 401(k) plan on January 31, 2000, contained sufficient discretion for the defendants to have retained the NGH and Nabisco funds after January 31, 2000, and that the failure to exercise
such discretion was a breach of fiduciary duty. In his complaint, the plaintiff requests, among other things, that the court require the defendants to pay as damages to the RJR 401(k) plan an amount equal to the subsequent appreciation that was
purportedly lost as a result of the liquidation of the NGH and Nabisco funds. 
 In July 2002, the defendants filed a
motion to dismiss, which the court granted in December 2003. In December 2004, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed the dismissal of the complaint, holding that the 1999 Amendment did contain sufficient discretion
for the defendants to have retained the NGH and Nabisco funds as of February 1, 2000, and remanded the case for further proceedings. The court granted the plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint and denied all pending motions as moot. In
April 2007, the defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint. The court granted the motion in part and denied it in part, dismissing all claims against the RJR Employee Benefits Committee and the RJR Pension Investment Committee. The
remaining defendants, RJR and RJR Tobacco, filed their answer and affirmative defenses in June 2007. The plaintiff filed a motion for class certification, which the court granted in September 2008. The district court ordered mediation, but
no resolution of the case was reached. In September 2008, each of the plaintiffs and the defendants filed motions for summary judgment, and in January 2009, the defendants filed a motion to decertify the class. A second mediation occurred
in June 2009, but again no resolution of the case was reached. The district court overruled the motions for summary judgment and the motion to decertify the class. 

  
 41 








 A non-jury trial was held in January and February 2010. During closing arguments,
the plaintiff argued for the first time that certain facts arising at trial showed that the 1999 Amendment was not validly adopted, and then moved to amend his complaint to conform to this evidence at trial. On June 1, 2011, the court granted
the plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint and found that the 1999 Amendment was invalid. 
 The parties filed their
findings of fact and conclusions of law on February 4, 2011. On February 25, 2013, the district court dismissed the case with prejudice. On March 8, 2013, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal. Briefing is complete. Oral argument
has not been scheduled. 
 Environmental Matters 

RAI and its subsidiaries are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations concerning the discharge,
storage, handling and disposal of hazardous or toxic substances. Such laws and regulations provide for significant fines, penalties and liabilities, sometimes without regard to whether the owner or operator of the property knew of, or was
responsible for, the release or presence of hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, third parties may make claims against owners or operators of properties for personal injuries and property damage associated with releases of hazardous or toxic
substances. In the past, RJR Tobacco has been named a potentially responsible party with third parties under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act with respect to several superfund sites. RAI and its subsidiaries
are not aware of any current environmental matters that are expected to have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations or financial position of RAI or its subsidiaries. 

RAI and its operating subsidiaries believe that climate change is an environmental issue primarily driven by carbon dioxide
emissions from the use of energy. RAI’s operating subsidiaries are working to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by minimizing the use of energy where cost effective, minimizing waste to landfills and increasing recycling. Climate change is not
viewed by RAI’s operating subsidiaries as a significant direct economic risk to their businesses, but rather an indirect risk involving the potential for a longer term general increase in the cost of doing business. Regulatory changes are
difficult to predict, but the current regulatory risks to the business of RAI’s operating subsidiaries with respect to climate change are relatively low. Financial impacts will be driven more by the cost of natural gas and electricity. Efforts
are made to mitigate the effect of increases in fuel costs directly impacting RAI’s operating subsidiaries by evaluating natural gas usage and market conditions, and occasionally purchasing forward contracts, limited to a three-year period, for
natural gas. In addition, RAI’s operating subsidiaries are constantly evaluating electrical energy conservation measures and energy efficient equipment to mitigate impacts of increases in electrical energy costs. 

Regulations promulgated by the EPA and other governmental agencies under various statutes have resulted in, and likely will
continue to result in, substantial expenditures for pollution control, waste treatment, facility modification and similar activities. RAI and its subsidiaries are engaged in a continuing program to comply with federal, state and local environmental
laws and regulations, and dependent upon the probability of occurrence and reasonable estimation of cost, accrue or disclose any material liability. Although it is difficult to reasonably estimate the portion of capital expenditures or other costs
attributable to compliance with environmental laws and regulations, RAI does not expect such expenditures or other costs to have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations, cash flows or financial position of RAI or its
subsidiaries. 
 Other Contingencies 

In connection with the sale of the international tobacco business to JTI, pursuant to the 1999 Purchase Agreement, RJR and RJR
Tobacco agreed to indemnify JTI against: 
  

	 	•	 	 any liabilities, costs and expenses arising out of the imposition or assessment of any tax with respect to the international tobacco business
arising prior to the sale, other than as reflected on the closing balance sheet; 



  
 42 









	 	•	 	 any liabilities, costs and expenses that JTI or any of its affiliates, including the acquired entities, may incur after the sale with respect to
any of RJR’s or RJR Tobacco’s employee benefit and welfare plans; and 


  

	 	•	 	 any liabilities, costs and expenses incurred by JTI or any of its affiliates arising out of certain activities of Northern Brands.



 As described above in “— Litigation Affecting the Cigarette Industry — Other
Litigation and Developments — JTI Claims for Indemnification,” RJR Tobacco has received claims for indemnification from JTI, and several of these have been resolved. Although RJR and RJR Tobacco recognize that, under certain circumstances,
they may have other unresolved indemnification obligations to JTI under the 1999 Purchase Agreement, RJR and RJR Tobacco disagree what circumstances described in such claims give rise to any indemnification obligations by RJR and RJR Tobacco and the
nature and extent of any such obligation. RJR and RJR Tobacco have conveyed their position to JTI, and the parties have agreed to resolve their differences at a later date. 

RJR Tobacco, SFNTC and American Snuff Co. have entered into agreements to indemnify certain distributors and retailers from
liability and related defense costs arising out of the sale or distribution of their products. Additionally, SFNTC has entered into an agreement to indemnify a supplier from liability and related defense costs arising out of the sale or use of
SFNTC’s products. The cost has been, and is expected to be, insignificant. RJR Tobacco, SFNTC and American Snuff Co. believe that the indemnified claims are substantially similar in nature and extent to the claims that they are already exposed
to by virtue of their having manufactured those products. 
 Except as otherwise noted above, RAI is not able to estimate
the maximum potential amount of future payments, if any, related to these indemnification obligations. 

  
 43 








 Schedule 3.12 

Subsidiaries 
 Part A: Material
Subsidiaries 
  

							
	 Name of Subsidiary
	  	 State of
Incorporation/Formation
	  	Borrower
Direct/Indirect
Ownership
Interest	 	 Direct
Owner

	 1. American Snuff Company, LLC
	  	Delaware	  	100%	 	Conwood Holdings, Inc.
	 2. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
	  	North Carolina	  	100%	 	R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.








 Part B: Subsidiary Guarantors 
  

							
	 Name of Subsidiary
	  	 State of
Incorporation/Formation
	  	Borrower
Direct/Indirect
Ownership
Interest	 	 Direct Owner

	 1. American Snuff Company, LLC
	  	Delaware	  	100%	 	Conwood Holdings, Inc.
	 2. Conwood Holdings, Inc.
	  	Delaware	  	100%	 	Reynolds American Inc.
	 3. RAI Services Company
	  	North Carolina	  	100%	 	Reynolds American Inc.
	 4. Reynolds Finance Company
	  	Delaware	  	100%	 	R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
	 5. Reynolds Innovations Inc.
	  	North Carolina	  	100%	 	Reynolds Finance Company
	 6. R. J. Reynolds Global Products, Inc.
	  	Delaware	  	100%	 	R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.
	 7. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
	  	Delaware	  	100%	 	R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
	 8. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
	  	North Carolina	  	100%	 	R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.
	 9. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.
	  	Delaware	  	100%	 	Reynolds American Inc.
	 10. Rosswil LLC
	  	Delaware	  	100%	 	Conwood Holdings, Inc.
	 11. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc.
	  	New Mexico	  	100%	 	Reynolds American Inc.








 Part C: Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries 

 

							
	 Name of Subsidiary
	  	 Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation/Formation
	  	Borrower
Direct/Indirect
Ownership
Interest	 	 Direct Owner

	 KBP Acquisition, LLC
	  	North Carolina	  	100%	 	Reynolds American Inc.
	 Niconovum AB
	  	Sweden	  	100%	 	Reynolds International Holdings B.V.
	 Niconovum USA, Inc.
	  	North Carolina	  	100%	 	Reynolds American Inc.
	 Northern Brands International, Inc.
	  	Delaware	  	100%	 	R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.
	 RAI International, Inc.
	  	Delaware	  	100%	 	Reynolds American Inc.
	 Reynolds Asia-Pacific Limited
	  	Hong Kong	  	100%	 	RAI International, Inc.
	 Reynolds International Holdings B.V.
	  	Netherlands	  	100%	 	R.J. Reynolds Tobacco C.V.
	 Reynolds Technologies, Inc.
	  	Delaware	  	100%	 	R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
	 R.J. Reynolds Tobacco B.V.
	  	Netherlands	  	100%	 	R.J. Reynolds Tobacco C.V.
	 R.J. Reynolds Tobacco (CI), Co.
	  	Cayman Islands	  	100%	 	R.J. Reynolds Tobacco C.V.
	 R.J. Reynolds Tobacco C.V.
	  	Netherlands	  	100%	 	R. J. Reynolds Global Products, Inc.
	 R. J. Reynolds Tobacco International, Inc.
	  	Delaware	  	100%	 	R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.
	 RJR Realty Relocation Services, Inc.
	  	North Carolina	  	100%	 	R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.
	 R. J. Reynolds Vapor Company
	  	North Carolina	  	100%	 	Reynolds American Inc.
	 Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company: Germany GmbH
	  	Germany	  	100%	 	Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc.
	 Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company Italy S.r.1
	  	Italy	  	100%	 	R. J. Reynolds Global Products, Inc.
	 Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company Japan K.K.
	  	Japan	  	100%	 	R. J. Reynolds Global Products, Inc.
	 Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company Spain S.R.L.
	  	Spain	  	100%	 	SFR Tobacco International GmbH
	 S.F. Imports, Inc.
	  	Delaware	  	100%	 	R .J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
	 SFR Tobacco International GmbH (SFRTI)
	  	Switzerland	  	100%	 	R.J. Reynolds Tobacco B.V.








 Schedule 6.01 

Existing Liens 
 None. 







 EXHIBIT A 

ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION 

This Assignment and Assumption (the “Assignment and Assumption”) is dated as of the Effective Date set forth
below and is entered into by and between [Insert name of Assignor] (the “Assignor”) and [Insert name of Assignee] (the “Assignee”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings
given to them in the Credit Agreement identified below (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”), receipt of a copy of which is hereby acknowledged by the Assignee. The Standard Terms and Conditions set forth in Annex 1 attached hereto
are hereby agreed to and incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Assignment and Assumption as if set forth herein in full. 

For an agreed consideration, the Assignor hereby irrevocably sells and assigns to the Assignee, and the Assignee hereby
irrevocably purchases and assumes from the Assignor, subject to and in accordance with the Standard Terms and Conditions and the Credit Agreement, as of the Effective Date inserted by the Administrative Agent as contemplated below (i) all of
the Assignor’s rights and obligations in its capacity as a Lender under the Credit Agreement and any other documents or instruments delivered pursuant thereto to the extent related to the amount and percentage interest identified below of all
of such outstanding rights and obligations of the Assignor under the Facility (including any letters of credit, guarantees, and swingline loans included in the Facility) and (ii) to the extent permitted to be assigned under applicable law, all
claims, suits, causes of action and any other right of the Assignor (in its capacity as a Lender) against any Person, whether known or unknown, arising under or in connection with the Credit Agreement, any other documents or instruments delivered
pursuant thereto or the loan transactions governed thereby or in any way based on or related to any of the foregoing, including contract claims, tort claims, malpractice claims, statutory claims and all other claims at law or in equity related to
the rights and obligations sold and assigned pursuant to clause (i) above (the rights and obligations sold and assigned pursuant to clauses (i) and (ii) above being referred to herein collectively as the “Assigned
Interest”). Such sale and assignment is without recourse to the Assignor and, except as expressly provided in this Assignment and Assumption, without representation or warranty by the Assignor. 

 

							
	 1.
	  	 Assignor:
	 	  
	  	
				
	 2.
	  	 Assignee:
	 	  
	  	
		  		 	 [and is an Affiliate/Approved Fund of [identify Lender]3]

				
	 3.
	  	 Borrower(s):
	 	 Reynolds American Inc.
	  	
			
	 4.
	  	 Administrative Agent:    
	 	 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as the administrative agent under the Credit Agreement

			
	 5.
	  	 Credit Agreement:
	 	 The $1,350,000,000 Credit Agreement dated as of October 8, 2013 among Reynolds American Inc., the Lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
as Administrative Agent, and the other agents party thereto


  

	3 	 Select as applicable. 



  
 1 









	6.	 Assigned Interest: 


  

									
	 	 	 Aggregate Amount of

Commitment/Revolving

Credit Exposure
 for all
Lenders
	  	 Amount of

Commitment/Revolving

Credit Exposure Assigned
	  	Percentage Assigned of
Commitment/Revolving
Credit Exposure4	 
				
		 	 $
	  	 $
	  	 	%	  
				
		 	 $
	  	 $
	  	 	%	  
				
		 	 $
	  	 $
	  	 	%	  

 Effective Date: _____________ ___, 20___ [TO BE INSERTED BY ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND WHICH SHALL BE THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF RECORDATION OF TRANSFER IN THE REGISTER THEREFOR.] 
 The Assignee agrees to deliver to the Administrative Agent a
completed Administrative Questionnaire in which the Assignee designates one or more Credit Contacts to whom all syndicate-level information (which may contain material non-public information about the Borrower, its Subsidiaries and its and their
Related Parties or their respective securities) will be made available and who may receive such information in accordance with the Assignee’s compliance procedures and applicable laws, including Federal and state securities laws. 

 

	4 	 Set forth, to at least 9 decimals, as a percentage of the Commitment/Loans of all Lenders thereunder. 









 The terms set forth in this Assignment and Assumption are hereby agreed to: 

 

			
	ASSIGNOR
	
	[NAME OF ASSIGNOR]
		
	By:	 	 
		 	Title:
	
	ASSIGNEE
	
	[NAME OF ASSIGNEE]
		
	By:	 	 
		 	Title:



  
 1 









			
	[Consented to and]5 Accepted:
	
	 [NAME OF ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT], as

Administrative Agent

		
	By	 	 
		 	Title:
	
	
	[Consented to:]6
	
	[NAME OF RELEVANT PARTY]
		
	By	 	 
		 	Title:

  

	5 	 To be added only if the consent of the Administrative Agent is required by the terms of the Credit Agreement. 



	6 	 To be added only if the consent of the Borrower and/or other parties (e.g., each Swingline Lender, each Issuing Bank, etc.) is required by
the terms of Section 9.04 of the Credit Agreement. 









 ANNEX 1 

REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC. CREDIT AGREEMENT 

STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR 

ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION 

1. Representations and Warranties. 

1.1 Assignor. The Assignor (a) represents and warrants that (i) it is the legal and beneficial owner of the
Assigned Interest, (ii) the Assigned Interest is free and clear of any lien, encumbrance or other adverse claim and (iii) it has full power and authority, and has taken all action necessary, to execute and deliver this Assignment and
Assumption and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby; and (b) assumes no responsibility with respect to (i) any statements, warranties or representations made in or in connection with the Credit Agreement or any other Loan
Document, (ii) the execution, legality, validity, enforceability, genuineness, sufficiency or value of the Loan Documents, (iii) the financial condition of the Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates or any other Person obligated
in respect of any Loan Document or (iv) the performance or observance by the Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates or any other Person of any of their respective obligations under any Loan Document. 

1.2 Assignee. The Assignee (a) represents and warrants that (i) it has full power and authority, and has
taken all action necessary, to execute and deliver this Assignment and Assumption and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and to become a Lender under the Credit Agreement, (ii) it satisfies the requirements, if any, specified in
the Credit Agreement that are required to be satisfied by it in order to acquire the Assigned Interest and become a Lender, (iii) from and after the Effective Date, it shall be bound by the provisions of the Credit Agreement as a Lender
thereunder and, to the extent of the Assigned Interest, shall have the obligations of a Lender thereunder, (iv) it has received a copy of the Credit Agreement, together with copies of the most recent financial statements delivered pursuant to
Section 5.01 thereof, as applicable, and such other documents and information as it has deemed appropriate to make its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this Assignment and Assumption and to purchase the Assigned Interest on the
basis of which it has made such analysis and decision independently and without reliance on the Administrative Agent or any other Lender, and (v) if it is a Non-U.S. Lender, attached to the Assignment and Assumption is any documentation
required to be delivered by it pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, duly completed and executed by the Assignee; and (b) agrees that (i) it will, independently and without reliance on the Administrative Agent, the Assignor or any
other Lender, and based on such documents and information as it shall deem appropriate at the time, continue to make its own credit decisions in taking or not taking action under the Loan Documents, and (ii) it will perform in accordance with
their terms all of the obligations which by the terms of the Loan Documents are required to be performed by it as a Lender. 

2. Payments. From and after the Effective Date, the Administrative Agent shall make all payments in respect of the
Assigned Interest (including payments of principal, interest, fees and other amounts) to the Assignor for amounts which have accrued to but excluding the Effective Date and to the Assignee for amounts which have accrued from and after the Effective
Date. 
 3. General Provisions. This Assignment and Assumption shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of,
the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. This Assignment and Assumption may be executed in any number of counterparts, which together shall constitute one instrument. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of
this Assignment and Assumption by telecopy shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Assignment and Assumption. This Assignment and Assumption shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the law of the
State of New York. 

  
 1 








 EXHIBIT B 

[FORM OF] 
 SUBSIDIARY GUARANTEE
AGREEMENT 

  
 1 








 EXHIBIT C-1 

[FORM OF] 
 U.S. TAX
CERTIFICATE 
 (For Non-U.S. Lenders That Are Not Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes) 

Reference is hereby made to the Credit Agreement, dated as of October 8, 2013 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise
modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”), among Reynolds American Inc., as Borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and each lender from time to time party thereto. 

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.16 of the Credit Agreement, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) it is
the sole record and beneficial owner of the Loan(s) (as well as any Note(s) evidencing such Loan(s)) in respect of which it is providing this certificate, (ii) it is not a bank within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Code,
(iii) it is not a ten percent shareholder of the Borrower within the meaning of Section 871(h)(3)(B) of the Code, (iv) it is not a controlled foreign corporation related to the Borrower as described in Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the
Code and (v) the interest payments in question are not effectively connected with the undersigned’s conduct of a U.S. trade or business. 

The undersigned has furnished the Administrative Agent and the Borrower with a certificate of its non-U.S. person status
on IRS Form W-8BEN. By executing this certificate, the undersigned agrees that (1) if the information provided on this certificate changes, the undersigned shall promptly so inform the Borrower and the Administrative Agent and (2) the
undersigned shall have at all times furnished the Borrower and the Administrative Agent with a properly completed and currently effective certificate in either the calendar year in which each payment is to be made to the undersigned, or in either of
the two calendar years preceding such payments. 
 Unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined in the Credit Agreement
and used herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement. 
  

			
	[NAME OF LENDER]
		
	By:	 	 
		 	Name:
		 	Title:

 Date: _____________ __, 20[    ] 

  
 1 








 EXHIBIT C-2 

[FORM OF] 
 U.S. TAX
CERTIFICATE 
 (For Non-U.S. Lenders That Are Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes) 

Reference is hereby made to the Credit Agreement, dated as of October 8, 2013 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise
modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”), among Reynolds American Inc., as Borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and each lender from time to time party thereto. 

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.16 of the Credit Agreement, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) it is
the sole record owner of the Loan(s) (as well as any Note(s) evidencing such Loan(s)) in respect of which it is providing this certificate, (ii) its partners/members are the sole beneficial owners of such Loan(s) (as well as any Note(s)
evidencing such Loan(s)), (iii) with respect to the extension of credit pursuant to this Credit Agreement, neither the undersigned nor any of its partners/members is a bank extending credit pursuant to a loan agreement entered into in the
ordinary course of its trade or business within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Code, (iv) none of its partners/members is a ten percent shareholder of the Borrower within the meaning of Section 871(h)(3)(B) of the Code,
(v) none of its partners/members is a controlled foreign corporation related to the Borrower as described in Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the Code, and (vi) the interest payments in question are not effectively connected with the
undersigned’s or its partners/members’ conduct of a U.S. trade or business. 
 The undersigned has furnished
the Administrative Agent and the Borrower with IRS Form W-8IMY accompanied by an IRS Form W-8BEN from each of its partners/members claiming the portfolio interest exemption. By executing this certificate, the undersigned agrees that
(1) if the information provided on this certificate changes, the undersigned shall promptly so inform the Borrower and the Administrative Agent and (2) the undersigned shall have at all times furnished the Borrower and the Administrative
Agent with a properly completed and currently effective certificate in either the calendar year in which each payment is to be made to the undersigned, or in either of the two calendar years preceding such payments. 

Unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined in the Credit Agreement and used herein shall have the meanings given to them
in the Credit Agreement. 
  

			
	[NAME OF LENDER]
		
	By:	 	 
		 	Name:
		 	Title:

 Date: _____________ __, 20[    ] 

  
 1 








 EXHIBIT C-3 

[FORM OF] 
 U.S. TAX
CERTIFICATE 
 (For Non-U.S. Participants That Are Not Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes) 

Reference is hereby made to the Credit Agreement, dated as of October 8, 2013 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise
modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”), among Reynolds American Inc., as Borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and each lender from time to time party thereto. 

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.16 of the Credit Agreement, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) it is
the sole record and beneficial owner of the participation in respect of which it is providing this certificate, (ii) it is not a bank within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Code, (iii) it is not a ten percent shareholder of
the Borrower within the meaning of Section 871(h)(3)(B) of the Code, (iv) it is not a controlled foreign corporation related to the Borrower as described in Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the Code, and (v) the interest payments in
question are not effectively connected with the undersigned’s conduct of a U.S. trade or business. 
 The
undersigned has furnished its participating Lender with a certificate of its non-U.S. person status on IRS Form W-8BEN. By executing this certificate, the undersigned agrees that (1) if the information provided on this certificate
changes, the undersigned shall promptly so inform such Lender in writing and (2) the undersigned shall have at all times furnished such Lender with a properly completed and currently effective certificate in either the calendar year in which
each payment is to be made to the undersigned, or in either of the two calendar years preceding such payments. 
 Unless
otherwise defined herein, terms defined in the Credit Agreement and used herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement. 
  

			
	[NAME OF LENDER]
		
	By:	 	 
		 	Name:
		 	Title:

 Date: _____________ __, 20[    ] 

  
 1 








 EXHIBIT C-4 

[FORM OF] 
 U.S. TAX
CERTIFICATE 
 (For Non-U.S. Participants That Are Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes) 

Reference is hereby made to the Credit Agreement, dated as of October 8, 2013 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise
modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”), among Reynolds American Inc., as Borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and each lender from time to time party thereto. 

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.16 of the Credit Agreement, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) it is
the sole record owner of the participation in respect of which it is providing this certificate, (ii) its partners/members are the sole beneficial owners of such participation, (iii) with respect such participation, neither the undersigned
nor any of its partners/members is a bank extending credit pursuant to a loan agreement entered into in the ordinary course of its trade or business within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Code, (iv) none of its partners/members
is a ten percent shareholder of the Borrower within the meaning of Section 871(h)(3)(B) of the Code, (v) none of its partners/members is a controlled foreign corporation related to the Borrower as described in Section 881(c)(3)(C) of
the Code, and (vi) the interest payments in question are not effectively connected with the undersigned’s or its partners/members’ conduct of a U.S. trade or business. 

The undersigned has furnished its participating Lender with IRS Form W-8IMY accompanied by an IRS Form W-8BEN from
each of its partners/members claiming the portfolio interest exemption. By executing this certificate, the undersigned agrees that (1) if the information provided on this certificate changes, the undersigned shall promptly so inform such Lender
and (2) the undersigned shall have at all times furnished such Lender with a properly completed and currently effective certificate in either the calendar year in which each payment is to be made to the undersigned, or in either of the two
calendar years preceding such payments. 
 Unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined in the Credit Agreement and used
herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement. 
  

			
	[NAME OF PARTICIPANT]
		
	By:	 	 
		 	Name:
		 	Title:

 Date: _____________ __, 20[    ] 

  
 1 








 EXHIBIT D 

FORM OF COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE 

This Compliance Certificate is delivered to you pursuant to Section 5.01(c) of the Credit Agreement, dated as of October
[__], 2013 (as amended, restated, supplemented or modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”), among Reynolds American Inc., (the “Borrower”), the lenders party thereto from time to time, and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. Terms defined in the Credit Agreement and not otherwise defined herein are used herein as therein defined. 

1. I am the duly elected, qualified and acting [            ]1 of the Borrower. 
 2. I have reviewed and am familiar with the contents
of this Compliance Certificate. I am providing this Compliance Certificate solely in my capacity as an officer of the Borrower. The matters set forth herein are true to the best of my knowledge after due inquiry. 

3. I have reviewed the terms of the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents and have made or caused to be made under my
supervision a review in reasonable detail of the transactions and condition of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries during the accounting period covered by the financial statements attached hereto as ANNEX 1 (the “Financial
Statements”). [Except as set forth on Annex 1(a),] [S]uch review did not disclose the existence during or at the end of the accounting period covered by the Financial Statements, and I have no knowledge of the existence, as of the date of
this Compliance Certificate, of any condition or event which constitutes a Default. 
 4. [Except as set forth on Annex
1(b),] I have no knowledge of the existence, as of the date of this Compliance Certificate, of any material change in GAAP or in the application thereof since the date of the audited financial statements referred to in Section 3.04 of the
Credit Agreement. 
 5. The following represent true and accurate calculations, as of [______ __, 20__], to be used to
determine compliance with the covenants set forth in Section 6.04 of the Credit Agreement: 
 (a) Consolidated Leverage
Ratio: 
  

			
	 Consolidated Debt (as at the last day of any period) =
	  	 [__________]

		
	 Consolidated EBITDA (for such period) =
	  	 [__________]

		
	 Actual Ratio =
	  	 [_____] to 1.00

		
	 Required Ratio =
	  	 3.00 to 1.00


 Supporting detail showing the calculation of Consolidated Leverage Ratio is attached hereto as
Schedule 1. 
  
  

1 Insert position of Financial Officer. 

 
  

	1 	 Insert position of Financial Officer. 









 (b) Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio: 

 

			
	 Consolidated EBITDA (for such period) =
	  	 [__________]

		
	 Consolidated Interest Expense (for such period) =
	  	 [__________]

		
	 Actual Ratio =
	  	 [_____] to 1.00

		
	 Required Ratio =
	  	 4.00 to 1.00


 Supporting detail showing the calculation of Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio is attached
hereto as Schedule 2. 







 ANNEX 1 

[Applicable Financial Statements to Be Attached] 







 SCHEDULE 1 

CONSOLIDATED LEVERAGE RATIO 
  

													
		  		  		  		  		 		 	
	 (A)    Consolidated Leverage Ratio: as at the last day of any period, the ratio of (a) Consolidated Debt on such day to (b)
Consolidated EBITDA for such period.

					
		  	 (a)
	  	 Consolidated Debt as of [_______ __, 20__]:
	 		 	
						
		  		  	 (I)
	  	 at any date, the aggregate principal amount of all Indebtedness of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries at such date, determined on a consolidated
basis in accordance with GAAP; provided that the aggregate amount available to be drawn (i.e., unfunded amounts) under all letters of credit, acceptances and similar arrangements and all surety, appeal and litigation bonds and similar
obligations issued for the account of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries (but excluding, for avoidance of doubt, all unpaid drawings or other matured monetary obligations or reimbursement obligations owing in respect of thereof) shall not be
included in any determination of “Consolidated Debt”:
	 		 	
							
		  		  		  	 (i)
	  	 all indebtedness of such Person for borrowed money or with respect to deposits or advances of any kind;
	 		 	 
							
		  		  		  	 (ii)
	  	 all obligations of such Person for the deferred purchase price of property or services (other than current trade payables and accrued expenses incurred in the
ordinary course of such Person’s business and any obligation of the Borrower or any Subsidiary thereof to purchase tobacco and/or other products, services and produce utilized in its business pursuant to agreements entered into in the ordinary
course of business on a basis consistent with the Borrower’s or such Subsidiary’s past practices or then current industry practices);
	 		 	 
							
		  		  		  	 (iii)
	  	 all obligations of such Person evidenced by notes, bonds, debentures or other similar instruments;
	 		 	 
							
		  		  		  	 (iv)
	  	 all indebtedness created or arising under any conditional sale or other title retention agreement with respect to property acquired by such Person (even though
the rights and remedies of the seller or lender under such agreement in the event of default are limited to repossession or sale of such property);
	 		 	 
							
		  		  		  	 (v)
	  	 all Capital Lease Obligations of such Person;
	 		 	 
							
		  		  		  	 (vi)
	  	 all obligations of such Person, contingent or otherwise, as an account party or applicant under or in respect of acceptances, letters of credit or similar
arrangements;
	 		 	 
							
		  		  		  	 (vii)
	  	 the maximum amount available to be drawn or paid under all surety, appeal and litigation bonds and similar obligations issued for the account of such Person and
all unreimbursed payments in respect of such surety, appeal and litigation bonds and similar obligations;
	 		 	 









													
		  		  		  	 (viii)
	  	 all Guarantees by such Person in respect of obligations of the kind referred to in items (A)(a)(I)(i) through (vii) above;
	 		 	 
							
		  		  		  	 (ix)
	  	 all obligations of the kind referred to in clauses (A)(a)(I)(i) through (viii) above secured by (or for which the holder of such obligation has an existing
right, contingent or otherwise, to be secured by) any Lien on property (including accounts and contract rights) owned by such Person, whether or not such Person has assumed or become liable for the payment of such obligation.
	 		 	 
				
		  	 The Indebtedness of any Person shall include the Indebtedness of any other entity (including any partnership in which such Person is a general
partner) to the extent such Person is liable therefor as a result of such Person’s ownership interest in or other relationship with such entity, except to the extent the terms of such Indebtedness expressly provide that such Person is not
liable therefor.
	 		 	
					
		  		  	Consolidated Debt	 		 	 
		  		  		  		  		 		 	









													
		  	 (b)
	  	 Consolidated EBITDA as of [_______ __, 20__]:
	 		 	
						
		  		  	 (I)
	  	 Consolidated Net Income for such period
	 		 	
							
		  		  		  	 (i)
	  	 Consolidated net income or loss of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for such period, determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP;
provided that there shall be excluded:
	 		 	 
							
		  		  		  	 (ii)
	  	 the income (or deficit) of any Person accrued prior to the date it becomes a Subsidiary of the Borrower or is merged into or consolidated with the Borrower or
any of its Subsidiaries, subject to the second sentence of the definition of “Consolidated EBITDA”;
	 		 	 
							
		  		  		  	 (iii)
	  	 the income (or deficit) of any Person (other than a Subsidiary of the Borrower) in which the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries has an ownership interest,
except to the extent that any such income is actually received by the Borrower or such Subsidiary in the form of dividends or similar distributions; and
	 		 	 
							
		  		  		  	 (iv)
	  	 the undistributed earnings of any Subsidiary of the Borrower to the extent that the declaration or payment of dividends or similar distributions by such
Subsidiary is not at the time permitted by the terms of any Contractual Obligation or Requirement of Law applicable to such Subsidiary. 
	 		 	 
					
		  		  	 plus; without duplication and to the extent reflected as a charge in the statement of such Consolidated Net Income for such period, the sum
of:
	 		 	
						
		  		  	 (II)(a)
	  	 provision for all income taxes and foreign withholding taxes;
	 		 	 
						
		  		  	(b)	  	 interest expense, amortization or write-off of debt discount and debt issuance costs and commissions, discounts and other fees and charges
associated with Indebtedness (including the Loans);
	 		 	 
						
		  		  	(c)	  	 depreciation and amortization expense;
	 		 	 
						
		  		  	(d)	  	 amortization of intangibles (including, but not limited to, goodwill) and organization costs;
	 		 	 
						
		  		  	(e)	  	 any extraordinary losses;
	 		 	 
						
		  		  	(f)	  	 any non-cash expenses or losses;
	 		 	 
		  		  		  		  		 		 	









													
		  		  	(g)	  	 any losses on sales of assets outside of the ordinary course of business (whether or not otherwise includable as a separate item in the statement of
such Consolidated Net Income for such period);
	 		 	 
						
		  		  	(h)	  	 any cash payment received during such period in respect of any non-cash item described in clause (III)(a)(i) or (ii) below subsequent to the
fiscal quarter in which the relevant non-cash item was reflected as a gain or income in the statement of Consolidated Net Income; and
	 		 	 
						
		  		  	(i)	  	 the amount of all cash payments received during such period in respect of any settlement with respect to tobacco litigation related liability which
otherwise did not increase Consolidated Net Income for such period or a prior period, all as determined on a consolidated basis for the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for such period; 
	 		 	 
						
		  		  	minus:	  		 		 	
						
		  		  	 (III)(a)
	  	 to the extent included in the statement of such Consolidated Net Income for such period, the sum of
	 		 	 
							
		  		  		  	 (i)
	  	 any extraordinary gain;
	 		 	 
							
		  		  		  	 (ii)
	  	 any non-cash income or gains;
	 		 	 
							
		  		  		  	 (iii)
	  	 any gain on sales of assets outside of the ordinary course of business (whether or not otherwise includable as a separate item in the statement of such
Consolidated Net Income for such period);
	 		 	 
							
		  		  		  	 (iv)
	  	 income tax credits (to the extent not netted from income tax expense);
	 		 	 
						
		  		  	(b)	  	 any cash payments made during such period in respect of any non-cash items described in items (II)(d), (e) or (f) above subsequent to the
fiscal quarter in which the relevant non-cash item was reflected as a charge in the statement of Consolidated Net Income; and
	 		 	 
						
		  		  	(c)	  	 the amount of all cash payments made by the Borrower and its Subsidiaries during such period pursuant to any settlement with respect to tobacco
litigation related liability which otherwise did not reduce Consolidated Net Income for such period or a prior period, all as determined on a consolidated basis for the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for such period.
	 		 	
				
		  	 For the purposes of calculating Consolidated EBITDA for any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters (each, a “Reference Period”)
pursuant to any determination of the Consolidated Leverage Ratio or the Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio
	 		 	
		  		  		  		  		 		 	









													
		  		  		  	 (i)
	  	 if at any time during such Reference Period (or, for purposes of Section 6.05(c) of the Credit Agreement only, during the period commencing on the first day of
such Reference Period and ending on or prior to such date of determination), the Borrower or any Subsidiary shall have made any Material Disposition, the Consolidated EBITDA for such Reference Period shall be reduced by an amount equal to the
Consolidated EBITDA (if positive) attributable to the property that is the subject of such Material Disposition for such Reference Period or increased by an amount equal to the Consolidated EBITDA (if negative) attributable thereto for such
Reference Period; and
	 		 	
							
		  		  		  	 (ii)
	  	 if during such Reference Period (or, for purposes of Section 6.05(c) of the Credit Agreement only, during the period commencing on the first day of such
Reference Period and ending on or prior to such date of determination), the Borrower or any Subsidiary shall have made a Material Acquisition, Consolidated EBITDA for such Reference Period shall be calculated after giving pro forma effect thereto as
if such Material Acquisition occurred on the first day of such Reference Period.
	 		 	
				
		  	 “Material Acquisition” means any acquisition of property or series of related acquisitions of property that (a) constitutes
assets comprising all or substantially all of an operating unit of a business or constitutes all or substantially all of the Equity Interests of a Person and (b) involves the payment of consideration by the Borrower and its Subsidiaries in
excess of $250,000,000; and “Material Disposition” means any disposition of property or series of related dispositions of property that yields gross proceeds to the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries in excess of
$250,000,000.
	 		 	
				
		  	Consolidated EBITDA	 		 	 
				
		  	Ratio of (a) Consolidated Debt to (b) Consolidated EBITDA	 		 	[___]:1.00
				
		  	Required Ratio	 		 	3:00:1.00
		  		  		  		  		 		 	








 SCHEDULE 2 

CONSOLIDATED INTEREST COVERAGE RATIO 
  

													
	 (A)    Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio: as at the last day of any period, the ratio of (a) Consolidated EBITDA for such
period to (b) Consolidated Interest Expense for such period.

					
		  	 (a)
	  	 Consolidated EBITDA as of [_______ __, 20__]:
	 		 	
					
		  		  	    Consolidated EBITDA (See Schedule 1 for calculation)	 		 	 
					
		  	 (b)
	  	 Consolidated Interest Expense for such period:
	 		 	
						
		  		  	 (I)
	  	 Total cash interest expense (including that attributable to Capital Lease Obligations) of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries calculated on a
consolidated basis for such period with respect to all outstanding Indebtedness of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries (including all commissions, discounts and other fees and charges owed with respect to letters of credit and bankers’ acceptance
financing and net costs under Swap Agreements in respect of interest rates to the extent such net costs are allocable to such period in accordance with GAAP).
	 		 	 
				
		  	 For the purposes of calculating Consolidated Interest Expense for any Reference Period pursuant to any determination of the Consolidated Interest
Coverage Ratio,
	 		 	
						
		  		  		  	 (i) all Indebtedness incurred or issued during the relevant Reference Period (or, for purposes of Section 6.05(c) of the Credit Agreement only,
during the period commencing on the first day of such Reference Period and ending on or prior to such date of determination) shall be deemed to have been incurred or issued (and the proceeds thereof applied) on the first day of such Reference Period
and remain outstanding through such Reference Period,
	 		 	
						
		  		  		  	 (ii) all Indebtedness (other than revolving Indebtedness, except to the extent accompanied by a corresponding permanent commitment reduction)
permanently retired or redeemed during the relevant Reference Period (or, for purposes of Section 6.05(c) of the Credit Agreement only, during the period commencing on the first day of such Reference Period and ending on or prior to such date of
determination) shall be deemed to have been retired or redeemed on the first day of such Reference Period and remain retired through the entirety of such Reference Period, and
	 		 	
						
		  		  		  	 (iii) all Indebtedness assumed to be outstanding pursuant to preceding clause (i) shall be deemed to have borne interest at (x) the rate applicable
thereto, in the case of fixed rate indebtedness, or (y) the rates which would have been applicable thereto during the respective Reference Period when same was deemed outstanding (for this purpose, using the floating rate applicable thereto at the
time of determination), in the case of floating rate Indebtedness; provided that interest expense with respect to any Indebtedness for periods while same was actually outstanding during the respective period shall be calculated using the
actual rates applicable thereto while the same was actually outstanding.
	 		 	
		  		  		  		  		 		 	









															
		  		  	Consolidated Interest Expense	 		 	 	 	 
					
		  	Ratio of (a) Consolidated EBITDA to (b) Consolidated Interest Expense	 		 		 	[___]:1.00
					
		  	Required Ratio	 		 		 	4:00:1.00
		  		  		  		  		 		 		 	








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Compliance Certificate this ____ day of
__________, 20__. 
  

			
	 REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 
		 	 Name:

		 	 Title: