19654 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2012 / Notices 

1For editorial reasons, upon codification in the 

U.S. Code, Part B was re-designated Part A. 

6. Conclusion 

BSH Home Appliances Corporation 

hereby requests approval of the Waiver 

petition and Interim Waiver. By granting 

said Waivers the Department of Energy 

will further ensure that water energy is 

measured in the same way by all 

Dishwasher Manufacturer’s that have a 

integrated water softener. Further, BSH 

would request that these Waivers be in 

good standing until such time that the 

test procedure can be formally modified 

to account for integrated water 

softeners. 

BSH Home Appliances certifies that 

all manufacturers of domestic 

Dishwashers as listed above have been 

notified by letter. Copies of these 

notifications are attached. 

With Best Regards, 

Mike Edwards 

Senior Engineer, Performance and 

Consumption 

BSH Home Appliances Corporation 

(FNbG) 

100 Bosch Blvd., Building 102 

New Bern, NC 28562–6924 

mike.edwards@bshg.com 

www.boschappliances.com 

Phone (252) 636–4334 

Fax (252) 636–4450 

[FR Doc. 2012–7811 Filed 3–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Office of Energy Efficiency and 

Renewable Energy 

[Case No. RF–022] 

Notice of Petition for Waiver of Sanyo 

E&E Corporation from the Department 

of Energy Residential Refrigerator and 

Refrigerator-Freezer Test Procedure 

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and 

Renewable Energy, Department of 

Energy, DoE. 

ACTION: Notice of petition for waiver and 

request for comments. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt 

of and publishes the Sanyo E&E 

Corporation (Sanyo) petition for waiver 

(hereafter, ‘‘petition’’) from specified 

portions of the U.S. Department of 

Energy (DOE) test procedure for 

determining the energy consumption of 

electric refrigerators and refrigeratorfreezers. The waiver request pertains to 

the hybrid wine chiller/beverage center 

basic models set forth in Sanyo’s 

petition. In its petition, Sanyo provides 

an alternate test procedure to test the 

wine chiller compartment at 55 °F 

instead of the prescribed temperature of 

38 °F. DOE solicits comments, data, and 

information concerning Sanyo’s petition 

and the suggested alternate test 

procedure. 

DATES: DOE will accept comments, data, 

and information with respect to the 

Sanyo Petition until May 2, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by case number ‘‘RF–022,’’ by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Email: 

AS_Waiver_Requests@ee.doe.gov 

Include the case number [Case No. RF– 

022] in the subject line of the message. 

• Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. 

Department of Energy, Building 

Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J/ 

1000 Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20585–0121. 

Telephone: (202) 586–2945. Please 

submit one signed original paper copy. 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda 

Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, 

Building Technologies Program, 950 

L’Enfant Plaza SW., Suite 600, 

Washington, DC 20024. Please submit 

one signed original paper copy. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

review the background documents 

relevant to this matter, you may visit the 

U.S. Department of Energy, 950 L’Enfant 

Plaza SW., Washington, DC, 20024; 

(202) 586–2945, between 9 a.m. and 4 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. Available documents 

include the following items: (1) This 

notice; (2) public comments received; 

(3) the petition for waiver and 

application for interim waiver; and (4) 

prior DOE rulemakings regarding 

similar refrigerator-freezers. Please call 

Ms. Brenda Edwards at the above 

telephone number for additional 

information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Bryan Berringer, U.S. Department of 

Energy, Building Technologies Program, 

Mail Stop EE–2J, Forrestal Building, 

1000 Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20585–0121. 

Telephone: (202) 586–0371. Email: 

Bryan.Berringer@ee.doe.gov. 

Ms. Elizabeth Kohl, U.S. Department 

of Energy, Office of the General Counsel, 

Mail Stop GC–71, Forrestal Building, 

1000 Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20585–0103. 

Telephone: (202) 586–7796. Email: 

Elizabeth.Kohl@hq.doe.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background and Authority 

Title III, Part B of the Energy Policy 

and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA), 

Public Law 94–163 (42 U.S.C. 6291– 

6309, as codified, established the Energy 

Conservation Program for Consumer 

Products Other Than Automobiles, a 

program covering most major household 

appliances, which includes the electric 

refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers 

that are the focus of this notice.1 Part B 

includes definitions, test procedures, 

labeling provisions, energy conservation 

standards, and the authority to require 

information and reports from 

manufacturers. Further, Part B 

authorizes the Secretary of Energy to 

prescribe test procedures that are 

reasonably designed to produce results 

which measure the energy efficiency, 

energy use, or estimated annual 

operating costs of a covered product, 

and that are not unduly burdensome to 

conduct. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)) The test 

procedure for electric refrigerators and 

electric refrigerator-freezers is contained 

in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix 

A1. 

The regulations set forth in 10 CFR 

430.27 contain provisions that enable a 

person to seek a waiver from the test 

procedure requirements for covered 

products. The Assistant Secretary for 

Energy Efficiency and Renewable 

Energy (the Assistant Secretary) will 

grant a waiver if it is determined that 

the basic model for which the petition 

for waiver was submitted contains one 

or more design characteristics that 

prevents testing of the basic model 

according to the prescribed test 

procedures, or if the prescribed test 

procedures may evaluate the basic 

model in a manner so unrepresentative 

of its true energy consumption 

characteristics as to provide materially 

inaccurate comparative data. 10 CFR 

430.27(l). Petitioners must include in 

their petition any alternate test 

procedures known to the petitioner to 

evaluate the basic model in a manner 

representative of its energy 

consumption. The Assistant Secretary 

may grant the waiver subject to 

conditions, including adherence to 

alternate test procedures. 10 CFR 

430.27(l). Waivers remain in effect 

pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 

430.27(m). 

II. Petition for Waiver of Test Procedure 

On June 2, 2011, Sanyo submitted a 

petition for waiver from the test 

procedure applicable to residential 

electric refrigerators and refrigeratorfreezers set forth in 10 CFR part 430, 

Subpart B, Appendix A1. Sanyo is 

requesting a waiver with respect to the 

test procedures for its hybrid models 

that consist of single-cabinet units with 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2012 / Notices 19655 

a refrigerated beverage compartment in 

the top portion and a wine storage 

compartment in the bottom of the units. 

DOE issued guidance that clarified the 

test procedures to be used for hybrid 

products such as the Sanyo models at 

issue here: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/ 

buildings/appliance_standards/ 

residential/pdfs/refrigerator_

definition_faq.pdf This guidance 

specifies that basic models such as the 

ones Sanyo identifies in its petition, 

which do not have a separate wine 

storage compartment with a separate 

exterior door, are to be tested according 

to the DOE test procedure in Appendix 

A1, with the temperatures specified 

therein. Sanyo asserts that the wine 

storage compartment cannot be tested at 

the prescribed temperature of 38°F, 

because the minimum compartment 

temperature is 45°F. Sanyo submitted an 

alternate test procedure to account for 

the energy consumption of its wine 

chiller/beverage centers. That alternate 

procedure would test the wine chiller 

compartment at 55°F, instead of the 

prescribed 38°F. The following basic 

models are included in Sanyo’s petition: 

JUB248LB, JUB248RB, JUB248LW, 

JUB248RW, KBCO24LS, KBCS24LS, 

KBCO24RS, KBCS24RS, and MBCM24FW. 

DOE makes decisions on waivers for 

only those models specifically set out in 

the petition, not future models that may 

be manufactured by the petitioner. 

Sanyo may submit a subsequent petition 

for waiver for additional models of 

electric refrigerators and refrigeratorfreezers for which it seeks a waiver from 

the DOE test procedure. In addition, 

DOE notes that the grant of a waiver 

does not release a petitioner from the 

certification requirements set forth at 10 

CFR part 429. 

We also note that the energy 

consumption of the basic models 

detailed in Sanyo’s petition suggests 

that these products, when tested in 

accordance with the alternate test 

procedure Sanyo is requesting to use, 

would appear to use an amount of 

energy that exceeds the energy 

conservation standards for the likely 

product classes that would apply. While 

this is a separate issue from the merits 

presented by this petition, DOE notes 

that should this in fact be the case, 

Sanyo would also need to seek 

exception relief from the applicable 

standards through the Office of Hearings 

and Appeals prior to making these 

products available for sale. The process 

for seeking such relief, which is 

authorized under 42 U.S.C. 7194, is 

detailed at 10 CFR 1003.20–1003.27. 

III. Summary and Request for 

Comments 

Through today’s notice, DOE 

announces receipt of Sanyo’s petition 

for waiver from certain parts of the test 

procedure that applies to residential 

refrigerators and refrigerator -freezers. 

DOE is publishing Sanyo’s petition for 

waiver in its entirety pursuant to 10 

CFR 430.27(b)(1)(iv). The petition 

contains no confidential information. 

The petition includes a suggested 

alternate test procedure to determine the 

energy consumption of Sanyo’s 

specified hybrid refrigerators. 

DOE solicits comments from 

interested parties on all aspects of the 

petition. Any person submitting written 

comments to DOE must also send a copy 

of such comments to the petitioner. The 

contact information for the petitioner is: 

Adam D. Bowser, ARENT FOX LLP, 

1050 Connecticut Avenue NW, 

Washington, DC 20036–5369, (202) 857– 

6450. All submissions received must 

include the agency name and case 

number for this proceeding. Submit 

electronic comments in WordPerfect, 

Microsoft Word, Portable Document 

Format (PDF), or text (American 

Standard Code for Information 

Interchange (ASCII)) file format and 

avoid the use of special characters or 

any form of encryption. Wherever 

possible, include the electronic 

signature of the author. DOE does not 

accept telefacsimiles (faxes). 

According to 10 CFR 1004.11, any 

person submitting information that he 

or she believes to be confidential and 

exempt by law from public disclosure 

should submit two copies to DOE: one 

copy of the document including all the 

information believed to be confidential, 

and one copy of the document with the 

information believed to be confidential 

deleted. DOE will make its own 

determination about the confidential 

status of the information and treat it 

according to its determination. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 27, 

2012. 

Kathleen B. Hogan, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy 

Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable 

Energy. 

Before The 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Washington, DC 20585 

In the Matter of: SANYO E&E Corp., 

Petitioner. 

Case Number: lllllllll 

Petition for Waiver 

SANYO E&E Corporation (‘‘SANYO 

E&E’’) respectfully submits this Petition 

for Waiver (‘‘Petition’’) pursuant to 10 

C.F.R. § 430.27 on the ground that its 

hybrid wine chiller/beverage center 

models (‘‘hybrid model(s)’’) listed below 

contain one or more design 

characteristics that prevent testing of the 

basic models according to the test 

procedures prescribed in 10 C.F.R. 

§ 430, subpart B, appendix A1. Sanyo 

therefore requests that it be permitted to 

employ the alternative testing method 

detailed below, as it is currently 

impossible to test these hybrid models 

under the existing test procedures. 

1. Description of Applicant 

SANYO E&E is part of an 

international organization with many 

subsidiaries and affiliates, including in 

the United States. Further information 

can be found at http://www.sanyo.com. 

SANYO E&E’s core traditional business 

has been the production of compact and 

mid-size refrigerators, freezers, wine 

storage appliances and other consumer 

and commercial refrigeration products. 

SANYO E&E, which is headquartered in 

San Diego, California, has been 

designing and selling these consumer 

and commercial refrigeration products 

since 1979. Further, SANYO E&E 

produces products sold not only under 

the SANYO brand name, but also under 

multiple other brand names and which 

are sold in the United States by SANYO 

E&E’s customers. 

2. Background and General Information 

SANYO E&E is requesting a waiver 

with respect to the test procedures for 

its hybrid models that consist of a 

combination of a refrigerated ‘‘beverage’’ 

compartment in the top portion of these 

single-cabinet units and a wine storage 

compartment on the bottom of the units, 

and for which an alternative testing 

procedure is necessary in order to 

certify, rate, and sell such models. 

These hybrid models include the 

following basic models: JUB248LB, 

JUB248RB, JUB248LW, JUB248RW, 

KBCO24LS, KBCS24LS, KBCO24RS, 

KBCS24RS, and MBCM24FW. 

SANYO E&E understands that DOE 

does not wish to prevent manufacturers 

from marketing new, innovative 

products that will enhance consumers’ 

well being and satisfaction. The market 

for wine storage products and related 

hybrid models has seen robust growth 

over the last few years and is expected 

to continue expanding for the 

foreseeable future. Therefore, there is a 

significant demand and need for these 

hybrid models. As discussed below, 

however, because of their unique design 

characteristics and temperature 

specifications, there is no way to certify, 

rate, and sell these hybrid models under 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

19656 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2012 / Notices 

1Available at http://www.gc.energy.gov/

documents/LargeCapacityRCW_guidance_

122210.pdf. 

2SANYO E&E cannot guarantee that its search 

disclosed every possible competing model, as 

SANYO E&E ordinarily does not search for and 

retain this information in the normal course of 

business, but to the best of SANYO E&E’s 

knowledge, certain GE hybrid models appear to be 

the closest substitutes to SANYO E&E’s hybrid 

models in terms of both functionality and design 

characteristics. However, GE represents in its 

product manuals that its hybrid models, 

specifically, ZDBC240, ZDBT240, ZDBR240, and 

ZDBI240, do not achieve temperatures below 40 °F 

and thus would not be considered a covered 

product under DOE regulations. SANYO E&E is 

uncertain if GE means that the average temperature 

of the entire cabinet does not drop below 40 °F, 

which is the case with all SANYO E&E’s hybrid 

models, or whether GE is representing that no 

portion of its single-cabinet models can achieve 

temperatures below 40 °F. Based on this 

uncertainty, SANYO E&E excluded GE from this 

section. SANYO E&E’s research did not reveal any 

other basic models that, after review of the design 

characteristics, were comparable to SANYO E&E’s 

hybrid models. 

the existing testing procedures, and a 

waiver is thus necessary. 

DOE has now clarified that it 

considers such hybrid models as 

covered products. Currently, however, 

there are no DOE testing procedures 

specifically tailored to hybrid models. 

Accordingly, the current testing 

requirements would not measure energy 

usage in a manner that truly represents 

the energy-consumption characteristics 

of these unique products, and, in fact, 

as described below, it would be 

impossible to test these models under 

the existing testing procedures. As DOE 

has previously stated, ‘‘[f]ully 

recognizing that product development 

occurs faster than the test procedure 

rulemaking process, the Department’s 

rules permit manufacturers of models 

not contemplated by the test procedures 

* * * to petition for a test procedure 

waiver in order to certify, rate, and sell 

such models.’’ GC Enforcement 

Guidance on the Application of Waivers 

and on the Waiver Process at 2 (rel. Dec. 

23, 2010); 1 see also DOE FAQ Guidance 

Regarding Coverage of Wine Chillers, 

Etc. in the R/F Standard/Test Procedure 

at 2 (rel. Feb. 10, 2011) (‘‘DOE 

recognizes the potential disparity in 

treatment among these hybrid products. 

As DOE indicated * * *, the 

Department plans to engage in a future 

rulemaking to more comprehensively 

address these types of products.’’). 

Accordingly, SANYO E&E 

respectfully requests a waiver from the 

test procedures prescribed in 10 C.F.R. 

§ 430, subpart B, appendix A1 until 

such time as DOE issues test procedures 

tailored to the unique product 

characteristics of these hybrid models, 

as discussed below. 

3. Product Characteristics of SANYO 

E&E Hybrid Models 

As noted above, SANYO E&E’s hybrid 

models consist of a combination of a 

refrigerated ‘‘beverage’’ compartment in 

the top portion of these single-cabinet 

units and a wine storage compartment 

on the bottom of the units. Wine 

connoisseurs recommend an average of 

55–57 °F for the long term storage of any 

kind of wine, and SANYO E&E has 

designed the wine storage 

compartments of its hybrid models with 

this ideal average temperature in mind. 

But because various types of wines have 

different ideal drinking temperatures 

(e.g., some red wines are best served in 

the mid-sixties, while some white wines 

are ideally served in the mid-forties), 

SANYO E&E has designed the wine 

storage compartments of its hybrid 

models to operate between a minimum 

temperature of 45 °F and a maximum 

temperature of 64 °F. In fact, heaters are 

used to ensure that the temperature in 

the wine storage compartment never 

drops below 45 °F, as wines chilled 

below this temperature risk becoming 

crystallized and, therefore, ruined. 

Currently, however, DOE’s testing 

procedures contained in 10 C.F.R. § 430, 

subpart B, appendix A1, mandate that 

energy consumption be measured when 

the compartment temperature is set at 

38 °F. Based on the design 

characteristics of its hybrid models 

noted above, however, SANYO E&E 

would need a waiver in order to 

properly ‘‘certify, rate, and sell such 

models,’’ because the existing test 

procedures contained in 10 C.F.R. § 430, 

subpart B, appendix A1, do not 

contemplate a product that is designed 

to be incapable of achieving a 

temperature below 45 °F. In short, 

testing SANYO E&E’s hybrid models at 

38 °F is simply not possible and not 

representative of the energy 

consumption characteristics of these 

models. 

Further, the hybrid models will 

typically have a door-opening usage 

aligned with household freezers, thus 

0.85 is the employed K factor 

(correction factor). See Appendix B1 to 

Subpart 430, 5.2.1.1, because Subpart 

430 does not recognize wine chiller as 

a category. Thus, the K factor from 

CAN/CSA 300–08 6.3.1.2 and HRF–1– 

2007 8.7.2.1.1 is used. 

SANYO E&E’s hybrid models listed 

above currently cannot be tested under 

the existing regulations, without a 

waiver as sought herein. To evaluate the 

models in a manner truly representative 

of their actual energy consumption 

characteristics, the standard 

temperature of single wine coolers (55 

°F) for the wine storage compartment 

and the standard temperature (38 °F) for 

the refrigerated beverage compartment 

should be used. Therefore, the energy 

consumption is defined by the higher of 

the two values calculated by the 

following two formulas (according to 10 

C.F.R. § 430, subpart B, Appendix A1): 

Energy consumption of the wine 

compartment: 

EWine = ET1 + [(ET2–ET1) x (55 °F– 

TW1)/(TW2–TW1)] *0.85 

Energy consumption of the refrigerated 

beverage compartment: 

EBeverage Compartment = ET1 + 

[(ET2¥ET1) × (38 °F¥TBC1)/ 

(TBC2¥TBC1)]. 

The total adjusted volume of basic 

model MBCM24FW is 5.75 cubic feet. 

Using the standard temperature of 55 °F 

for the wine compartment the annual 

energy use of the model is 436 kWh/ 

year. According to current DOE 

standards, this model is classified as a 

compact refrigerator with automatic 

defrost without through-the-door ice 

service. 

The total adjusted volume of basic 

models JUB248LB, JUB248RB, 

JUB248LW, JUB248RW, KBCO24LS, 

KBCS24LS, KBCO24RS, KBCS24RS is 

5.41 cubic feet. Using the standard 

temperature of 55 °F for the wine 

compartment the annual energy use of 

the model is thus 431 kWh/year. 

According to current DOE standards, 

these models are also classified as 

compact refrigerators with automatic 

defrost without through-the-door ice 

service. 

4. Manufacturers of Other Basic Models 

Marketed in the United States Known to 

Incorporate Similar Design 

Characteristics 

After reviewing publicly available 

product manuals of comparable hybrid 

models, SANYOE E&E was unable to 

locate a basic model marketed in the 

United States that incorporates similar 

design characteristics and that also 

would be considered a ‘‘covered 

product’’ under Section 430.62 of DOE’s 

rules.2

If DOE requires any additional 

information to properly consider this 

Petition for Waiver, please do not 

hesitate to contact the undersigned. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Kenji Maru 

President 

SANYO E&E Corp. 

Alan G. Fishel 

Adam D. Bowser 

Arent Fox LLP 

1050 Connecticut Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20036–5369 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2012 / Notices 19657 

(202) 857–6450 

fishel.alan@arentfox.com 

bowser.adam@arentfox.com 

lllllllllllllllllll

Date 

[FR Doc. 2012–7812 Filed 3–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

Combined Notice of Filings #1 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following electric corporate 

filings: 

Docket Numbers: EC12–84–000. 

Applicants: AER NY-Gen, LLC, 

Alliance NYGT, LLC. 

Description: AER NY-Gen, LLC and 

Alliance NYGT, LLC submits their 

Application for Approval under Section 

203 of the Federal Power Act and 

Request for Expedited Consideration. 

Filed Date: 3/20/12. 

Accession Number: 20120320–5171. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/10/12. 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following electric rate 

filings: 

Docket Numbers: ER12–629–001. 

Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc. 

Description: Westar Energy, Inc. 

submits tariff filing per 35: Compliance 

Filing, Oklahoma Municipal Power 

Authority Letter Agreement to be 

effective N/A. 

Filed Date: 3/20/12. 

Accession Number: 20120320–5163. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/10/12. 

Docket Numbers: ER12–1296–000. 

Applicants: ResCom Energy LLC. 

Description: Amended Tariff Filing to 

be effective 2/3/2012. 

Filed Date: 3/20/12. 

Accession Number: 20120320–5154. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/10/12. 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following electric securities 

filings: 

Docket Numbers: ES12–23–000. 

Applicants: Wolverine Power Supply 

Cooperative, Inc. 

Description: Second Amendment to 

Application for Authorization of the 

Assumption of Liabilities and the 

Issuance of Securities under Section 204 

of the Federal Power Act of Wolverine 

Power Supply Cooperative, Inc. 

Filed Date: 3/16/12. 

Accession Number: 20120316–5102. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/26/12. 

The filings are accessible in the 

Commission’s eLibrary system by 

clicking on the links or querying the 

docket number. 

Any person desiring to intervene or 

protest in any of the above proceedings 

must file in accordance with Rules 211 

and 214 of the Commission’s 

Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 

385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern 

time on the specified comment date. 

Protests may be considered, but 

intervention is necessary to become a 

party to the proceeding. 

eFiling is encouraged. More detailed 

information relating to filing 

requirements, interventions, protests, 

service, and qualifying facilities filings 

can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/ 

docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For 

other information, call (866) 208–3676 

(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. 

Dated: March 21, 2012. 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7777 Filed 3–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

Combined Notice of Filings #2 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following electric rate 

filings: 

Docket Numbers: ER10–1513–001. 

Applicants: Wolverine Power Supply 

Cooperative, Inc. 

Description: Amended Market Power 

Update of Wolverine Power Supply 

Cooperative, Inc. 

Filed Date: 3/9/12. 

Accession Number: 20120309–5160. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/10/12. 

Docket Numbers: ER10–3199–001. 

Applicants: Montana-Dakota Utilities 

Co., a Division. 

Description: Request of MontanaDakota Utilities Co., a Division of MDU 

Resources Group Inc. 

Filed Date: 3/20/12. 

Accession Number: 20120320–5112. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/10/12. 

Docket Numbers: ER12–1189–001. 

Applicants: DeWind Novus, LLC. 

Description: Amended MBR Tariff 

Filing to be effective 4/30/2012. 

Filed Date: 3/20/12. 

Accession Number: 20120320–5115. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/3/12. 

Docket Numbers: ER12–1292–000. 

Applicants: Goshen Phase II LLC. 

Description: Amended and Restated 

SFA to be effective 12/31/9998. 

Filed Date: 3/20/12. 

Accession Number: 20120320–5000. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/10/12. 

Docket Numbers: ER12–1294–000. 

Applicants: PJM Interconnection, 

L.L.C. 

Description: Notice of Cancellation of 

Service Agreement 2949 in Docket No. 

ER11–3890–000 to be effective 1/31/ 

2012. 

Filed Date: 3/20/12. 

Accession Number: 20120320–5062. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/10/12. 

Docket Numbers: ER12–1295–000. 

Applicants: PJM Interconnection, 

L.L.C. 

Description: Notice of Cancellation of 

SA No. 2841 under Docket No. ER11– 

3347–000 to be effective 2/29/2012. 

Filed Date: 3/20/12. 

Accession Number: 20120320–5064. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/10/12. 

The filings are accessible in the 

Commission’s eLibrary system by 

clicking on the links or querying the 

docket number. 

Any person desiring to intervene or 

protest in any of the above proceedings 

must file in accordance with Rules 211 

and 214 of the Commission’s 

Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 

385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern 

time on the specified comment date. 

Protests may be considered, but 

intervention is necessary to become a 

party to the proceeding. 

eFiling is encouraged. More detailed 

information relating to filing 

requirements, interventions, protests, 

service, and qualifying facilities filings 

can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/ 

docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For 

other information, call (866) 208–3676 

(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. 

Dated: March 20, 2012. 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7776 Filed 3–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

Combined Notice of Filings #1 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following electric corporate 

filings: 

Docket Numbers: EC12–82–000. 

Applicants: Ridgeline Alternative 

Energy, LLC, Wolverine Creek Goshen 

Interconnection LLC. 

Description: Errata Letter to Submit 

Revised Exhibit B. 

Filed Date: 3/21/12. 

Accession Number: 20120321–5175. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/6/12. 

Docket Numbers: EC12–83–000. 

Applicants: Goshen Phase II LLC, 

Ridgeline Alternative Energy, LLC. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES