alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: marta_diaz@msn.com [mailto:marta_diaz@msn.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:31 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Marta Diaz 

14621 Winterfield Dr 

Centreville, VA 20120
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 22, 2014.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 22, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15A0301. CHRISTINA FENTON v. MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
#### § 236.755 Link, rocker.

That portion of an interlocking machine which transmits motion between the latch and the universal link.
#### § 224.111 Renewal.

Regardless of condition, retroreflective sheeting required under this part must be replaced with new sheeting no later than ten years after the date of initial installation. At the time of replacement, it is not necessary to remove the old sheeting unless it interferes with the placement of the new sheeting, but the old sheeting shall not be considered in calculating the amount of retroreflective material required under this part. For purposes of this section, November 28, 2005, shall be considered the initial date of installation for freight cars and locomotives covered by § 224.107(a)(3) or 224.107(b)(3).
Docket: IRS-2009-0008 

Request for Information for Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 

2008 

Comment On: IRS-2009-0008-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: IRS-2009-0008-0085 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-09629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Lauren Salani 

Address: 

West Long Branch, NJ, 

Organization: Physicians for Alternative Medicine 

General Comment 

Re: Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity 

Act of 2008 (Request for Information) 

To Whom it May Concern, 

I have been a provider of biofeedback services as part of a medical team for almost 

ten years. Within the practice, biofeedback services are utilized as effective 

treatment for headache, anxiety, chronic pain conditions, and hypertension. The 

patients coming to the office are seeking natural alternatives to medication. When 

they achieve symptom relief, they are surprised that their own physician hadn't 

recommended a course biofeedback instead of a purely pharmacological 

approach. A course of biofeedback instructs the patient to reduce and manage 

their symptoms by altering their own physiology. This process requires the patient 

to shift their behavior to take more responsibility for their own health. These 

positive behavior changes will have long-term health benefits to the patient and 

should serve to reduce utilization of the health care system in the future. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 29, 2009 

Tracking No. 809bb83f 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 238 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 238

To provide for the protection of wild horses within the Ozark National 
       Scenic Riverways and prohibit the removal of such horses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

Mr. Emerson (for himself, Mr. Skelton, and Mr. Hancock) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the protection of wild horses within the Ozark National 
       Scenic Riverways and prohibit the removal of such horses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ozark Wild Horses Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF FREE-ROAMING HORSES.

    The first section of the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the 
establishment of the Ozark National Scenic Riverways in the State of 
Missouri, and for other purposes'', approved August 27, 1964 (78 Stat. 
608; 16 U.S.C. 460m), is amended in the first sentence by inserting 
``protection and preservation of free-roaming horses,'' after 
``wildlife,''.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF REMOVAL OF HORSES.

    Section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the 
establishment of the Ozark National Scenic Riverways in the State of 
Missouri, and for other purposes'', approved August 27, 1964 (78 Stat. 
609; 16 U.S.C. 460m-4), is amended by adding the following new 
subsection at the end:
    ``(c) The Secretary may not remove, or allow or assist in the 
removal of, any free-roaming horse from Federal lands within the 
boundaries of the Ozark National Scenic Riverways, except in the case 
of medical emergency or natural disaster.''.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 195

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.126 Flange connection.

Each component of a flange connection must be compatible with each other component and the connection as a unit must be suitable for the service in which it is to be used.
**Exhibit 23** **Consent    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     The Board of Directors and Stockholders    CSS Industries, Inc.:     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration    statements on    Form S-8    (Nos.    333-100795    and    333-31941)    of CSS Industries, Inc. of our reports dated June 1, 2007,    with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CSS    Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2007 and    2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations and    comprehensive income, cash flows and stockholders’ equity    for each of the years in the three-year period ended    March 31, 2007, and the related financial statement    schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of    internal control over financial reporting as of March 31,    2007 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial    reporting as of March 31, 2007, which reports appear in the    March 31, 2007 annual report on    Form 10-K    of CSS Industries, Inc.     Our report dated June 1, 2007 on the consolidated financial    statements refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial    Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment,    effective April 1, 2006. /s/  KPMG    LLP     Philadelphia, Pennsylvania    June 1, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel, The Research Core Center P30.                    

*Date:*                         September 28, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Christine A. Livingston, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIDCD, 6120 Executive Blvd.—MSC 7180, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-8683,                         *livingsc@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 22, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-4218  Filed 8-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Luigi Russo, Plaintiff-Respondent, *v.*John Lordi, Impleaded with Louis D. Cantelmo, Defendant-Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

November, 1910.)

Pleading — Amendments — Amendments by leave of court — Conditions on granting leave to amend — Payment of costs — To two defendants on amendment of complaint.

Where an amendment of the complaint will require the two defendants who in good faith appear by separate attorneys to plead anew and prepare for trial upon the new issue, the amendment will b.e granted only upon condition of the payment of costs to both defendants.

Appeal by the defendant Lordi from an order of the City Court of the city of New York granting plaintiff’s motion to .amend the complaint.

Palmieri & Wechsler, for appellant.

Isador Dobroezynski, for respondent.

Seabury, J.

This action is brought against the defendant Lordi as owner and the defendant Cantelmo .as contractor for work performed and materials furnished to the defendants. The defendants appeared in the action by.separate attorneys and their good faith in so doing is not questioned. When the action first came to trial the plaintiff’s motion to withdraw a juror and to amend his complaint was granted upon the payment of costs only to the defendant Lordi. Subsequently the plaintiff again asked leave to amend his complaint. This motion was granted upon the payment of costs to the defendant Cantelmo. The defendant Lordi now appeals from so much of the order as fails to make an -award of costs to him. The amended complaint made it necessary for both of the defendants to plead anew and to prepare for trial so as to meet the issue tendered by the 'amended complaint and should only have been granted *331upon costs being awarded to both of the defendants. Rowe v. Granger, 118 App. Div. 459.

Tbe order is modified by awarding a separate bill of costs to each' defendant and, as modified, is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant.

Page and Bijur, JJ., concur.

Order modified and, as modified, affirmed.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 02766

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 02766\02766 Calc Sheet.DOC ERG Technical Reviewer Notes

x 02766\02766_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

02766\02766_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 02766\02766_email.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 02766\02766_PartA.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 02766\02766_PartB.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 02766\02766_PartC.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 02766\02766_PartD.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 02766\02766_PartH.XLS Plant submitted survey file

02766\Certification Statement Plant ID 02766.pdf Plant certification statement

02766\Supplemental Documentation\02766_Ash diagram WG 1.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02766\Supplemental Documentation\02766_MAP-1.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02766\Supplemental Documentation\02766_WB-1.XLS Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02766\Supplemental Documentation\02766_WB-2.XLS Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in each Registration Statement
of CLARCOR Inc. on Form S-8 (file numbers 33-5456, 33-38590, 33-39374, 33-53763
and 33-53899) of our reports dated January 8, 1999, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of CLARCOR Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
November 30, 1998 and 1997 and for the years ended November 30, 1998, 1997 and
1996, and the financial statement schedule for the years ended November 30,
1998, 1997, and 1996, which reports are included or incorporated by reference in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
                                         PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
Chicago, Illinois
February 18, 1999
Document has been coded “B” May be requested under the Freedom of

Information Act h ttp:// www.epa.gov/pesticides/foia but access is restricted to entities not engaged in the production sale or distributio n of pesticides outside the United States
-----Original Message----- 

From: msrobbins47@snet.net [mailto:msrobbins47@snet.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:01 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Mary Robbins 

14 Suren Lane 

Shelton, CT 06484
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1










March 20, 2006



Mr. George T. Haymaker, Jr.

c/o Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation

27422 Portola Parkway, Suite 350

Foothill Ranch, California 92610




     Re:     Non-Executive Chairman of the Boards Agreement



Dear George:




     On behalf of the Boards of Directors (the “Boards”) of Kaiser Aluminum Corporation and Kaiser
Aluminum & Chemical Corporation this letter confirms the extension of the term of your
Non-Executive Chairman of the Boards Agreement dated January 7, 2005 (as amended, the “Agreement”)
through the earlier of (i) June 30, 2006 and (ii) the effective date of the plan of reorganization
filed by the companies as such plan may be amended or modified. As a result of the extension, any
references to March 31, 2006 in the Agreement will be deemed to be amended to refer to June 30,
2006. Except as noted in this letter, all other terms of the Agreement shall continue in full
force and effect.



     George, the Boards are very pleased that you are willing to continue the duties of
non-executive Chairman of the Boards. Your contributions continue to be invaluable and we look
forward to continuing to work with you.



     If the terms of this extension are consistent with your understanding of the terms of the
extension, please sign this letter in the space provided below and return a copy to me.




Very truly yours,





John Barneson

Senior Vice President and

Chief Administrative Officer


The foregoing is agreed to and accepted

effective as of March ___, 2006

 




	 	 	 
	 

George T. Haymaker, Jr.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, October 11, 1995 (126), Para 126.19 Message from the President]
[Page 1503]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.126.19  message from the president

  A message in writing from the President of the United States was 
communicated to the House by Mr. Edwin Thomas, one of his secretaries.

  The Committee resumed its sitting; and after some further time spent 
therein,
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

DAVID KISSI,

 Movant - Appellant,

 v.

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS INC., a

corporation; et al.,

 Defendants,

ERIC R. CALLOWAY,

 Claimant.

No. 12-55209

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-04193-JFW-SS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 19, 2013** 

FILED

DEC 09 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

David Kissi appeals pro se from the district court’s order rejecting his

attempt to file a “Motion for Reconsideration” in the Federal Trade Commission’s

action alleging that defendants violated the Federal Trade Commission Act. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo questions of

standing, and for an abuse of discretion the district court’s decisions regarding

management of litigation. Preminger v. Peake, 552 F.3d 757, 762 n.3, 769 n.11

(9th Cir. 2008). We dismiss the appeal for lack of standing. 

Kissi, who was not a party to the action, lacks standing to challenge the

judgment or to bring this appeal. See Citibank Int’l v. Collier-Traino, Inc., 809

F.2d 1438, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1987) (a nonparty has standing to challenge or appeal

a judgment “only in exceptional circumstances,” which exist where the nonparty

participated in proceedings below and the equities favor hearing the challenge or

appeal). Moreover, the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to file

Kissi’s motion because Kissi submitted it over a year after the case had closed. See

S. Cal. Edison Co. v. Lynch, 307 F.3d 794, 807 (9th Cir. 2002) (“District courts

have ‘inherent power’ to control their dockets.” (citation omitted)).

DISMISSED.

2 12-55209
EXHIBIT 99.2

                           OMEGA FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      This certification is intended to accompany Omega Financial Corporation's
(the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31,
2003 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. To the best of my knowledge, I, Daniel L. Warfel, hereby certify in my
capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.


                                                /s/ Daniel L. Warfel
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Daniel L. Warfel
                                                Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 9, 2003
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2013 - 0340 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010 - SW - 081 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**