alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. 

17445 JFK Boulevard 

Houston, TX 77032 

March 24th, 2011 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor, 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

I am petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), on behalf of ExpressJet Airlines, for a 

replacement of Exemption No. 6798, as amended, with Exemption No. 7135, as amended. Both of these 

are exemptions from § 121.434(c)(1)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations which allows the 

certificate holder to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman or aircrew program designee for 

an FAA inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command who is completing initial or upgrade training 

specified in § 121.424 during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a landing. 

At present, ExpressJet Airlines is merging operations with Atlantic Southeast Airlines and wish to 

transition our exemption (6798) to match that of Atlantic Southeast Airlines, exemption 7135 as amended. 

We have reviewed both of these exemptions and can find no material differences in the conditions and 

limitations therein. Once the Single Operating Certificate is issued, the surviving Operation Specifications 

would then have already harmonized exemptions which would serve to facilitate that transition. 

There have been no changes in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were 

the basis of granting both of these exemptions. 

Thank you in advance for your consideration of this request; we look forward to your response. 

Respectfully, 

Greg Wooley 

Director, Flight Traininig 

ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. 

lc 

cc: Federal Aviation Administration, Air Transportation Division, AFS-200
#### Patrick Kane, *Appellant, v.*Amelia A. Stark and others, *as Administrators, etc., Respondents*.

Order refusing new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Cullen, J.;

Barnard, F. J., not sitting.
-----Original Message----- 

From: jmtu@verizon.net [mailto:jmtu@verizon.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 5:54 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

June Turcotte 

51 Phillips Pl, PO Box 1065 

Northampton, MA 01061
#### Mattie Jay et al. v. The State.

*No. 538.*

*Decided January 30.*

Scire Facias Cases—Briefs in—Practice on Appeal.—Scire facias cases on forfeited recognizance or bail bonds are by statute expressly declared to be governed by the same rules governing other civil actions (Code of Criminal Procedure, articles 444-449); and on appeal, unless briefs have been filed in the court below and in this court in compliance with the Rules, such appeals will be dismissed.

Appeal from the County Court of Ellis. Tried below before Hon. D. E. Singleton, County Judge.

An information was filed in the County Court against appellant, charging her with adultery with one Dan Levine, a married man. Upon her arrest, she executed a bail bond for her appearance to answer at the next regular term of the court. Railing to appear at said term, her bond was forfeited, and judgment nisi rendered against her and her sureties. Scire facias was duly issued, and at the next term of court the judgment nisi was made final, and the parties appealed from said final judgment to the Court of Criminal Appeals.

In the Court of Criminal A.ppeals the Assistant Attorney-General moved to dismiss the appeal, "for that counsel for appellant did not file any brief in this court nor in the court below, as is required by the rules of this court in such cases.” This motion was sustained.

Ho briefs for appellant.

*Mann Trice,*Assistant-Attorney-General, for the State.

HURT, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment on a forfeited bail bond. It is filed here without briefs, and motion is made by the Assistant-Attorney-General to dismiss this appeal, because of the failure of the appellants to file their brief in this court, and in not complying with the Rules in filing copy in the lower court. This character of case is governed by the same rules on appeal as civil causes by express statutory enactment.

The appeal is dismissed.

*Dismissed.*

Judges all present and concurring.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, August 2, 1995 (107), Para 107.9 Order of Business--Consideration of Amendments--H.R. 2127]
[Pages 1240-1241]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.107.9  order of business--consideration of amendments--h.r. 2127

  On motion of Mr. PORTER, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That during the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2127) making 
appropriations for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, 
and Education, and related agencies, for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 1996, and for other purposes, in the Committee of the 
Whole, pursuant to House Resolution 208, the following shall also be 
applicable:
  The following amendments (identified by their designation in the 
Congressional Record, pursuant to clause 6 of rule XXIII) may amend 
portions of the bill not yet read for amendment, shall not be subject to 
amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the 
question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole, if offered by 
the Member designated: the amendment numbered 36 to be offered by Mr. 
Obey and an amendment en bloc consisting of amendments numbered 60, 61, 
and 62 to be offered by Ms. Pelosi.
  The time for debate on each of the following amendments to the bill 
(identified in the Congressional Record, pursuant to clause 6 of rule 
XXIII, unless otherwise specified) and any amendments thereto shall be 
limited to 40 minutes equally divided and controlled by the proponent of 
the amendment to

[[Page 1241]]

the bill and an opponent: the amendment numbered 36 to be offered by Mr. 
Obey; the amendment numbered 70 to be offered by Mr. Stokes; the 
amendment numbered 30 to be offered by Mr. Kolbe; the amendment 
proposing to strike section 509 of the bill to be offered by Mr. Skaggs; 
the amendment numbered 64 to be offered by Mr. Skaggs; the amendment 
proposing to amend title VI of the bill to be offered by Mr. Sabo or Mr. 
Obey; and the amendment relating to the subject of political advocacy to 
be offered by Mr. Solomon.
  Except as otherwise specified in House Resolution 208, the time for 
debate on each other amendment to the bill and any amendment thereto 
shall be limited to 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the 
proponent of the amendment to the bill and an opponent.
  After a motion that the Committee rise has been rejected on a day, the 
Chairman may entertain another such motion on that day, only if offered 
by the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations or the Majority 
Leader or their designee.
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 163 (Thursday, August 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 48256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4128]



[[Page 48256]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Ouachita-Ozark Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Meeting notice for the Ouachita-Ozark Resource Advisory 
Committee under Section 205 of the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is published in accordance with section 10(a)(2) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Meeting notice is hereby given 
for the Ouachita-Ozark Resource Advisory Committee pursuant to Section 
205 of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act of 
2000, Public Law 106-393. Topics to be discussed include: General 
information, proposed new Title II projects, updates on current or 
completed Title II projects, election of officers, and, if appropriate, 
next meeting date and agenda.

DATES: The meeting will be held on September 11, 2007, beginning at 6 
p.m. and ending at approximately 9 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Scott County Courthouse, 100 
W. First Street, Waldron, AR 71958.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caroline Mitchell, Committee 
Coordinator, USDA, Ouachita National Forest, P.O. Box 1270, Hot 
Springs, AR 71902. (501-321-5318).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff, Committee members, and 
elected officials. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the 
attention of the Committee may file written statements with the 
Committee staff before or after the meeting. Individuals wishing to 
speak or propose agenda items must send their names and proposals to 
Bill Pell, DFO, P.O. Box 1270, Hot Springs, AR 71902.

    Dated: August 16, 2007.
Bill Pell,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 07-4128 Filed 8-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-52-M
# Wheelchair Pa ssag ew ay

© Central Japan Railway Company. Photo used with permission of Central Japan Railway Company and U.S. - Japan High - Speed Rail, LLC. Not to be used for any commercial purpose.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, August 3, 1995 (108), Para 108.33 Memorials]
[Page 1258]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.108.33  memorials

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, memorials were presented and referred as 
follows:

       147. By the SPEAKER: Memorial of the House of 
     Representatives of the State of Oregon, relative to urging 
     the Congress of the United States to transfer title of the 
     Oregon and California railroad grant lands to the State of 
     Oregon; to the Committee on Resources.
       148. Also, memorial of the House of Representatives of the 
     State of Oregon, relative to urging the Congress of the 
     United States to amend the Constitution of the United States 
     to require a balanced Federal budget; to the Committee on the 
     Judiciary.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(1)


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United Bancorporation of
Alabama, Inc. for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
R. Jones, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1).     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2).     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Corporation.


Date: November 14, 2002                By:  /s/ Robert R. Jones, III
                                            ------------------------
                                            Robert R. Jones, III
                                            Chief Executive Officer
# EUR-Lex - 52003PC0633 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52003PC0633

**Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 on the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco /* COM/2003/0633 final - CNS 2003/0251 */ **

*

*

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION amending Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 on the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco

(presented by the Commission)

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

The purpose of this proposal for a Council Regulation is to set the deduction from the 2004 harvest premium to finance the Community Tobacco Fund.

This measure is being proposed transitionally pending entry into force of the reform of the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco.

Under these circumstances, the level chosen is the same as that set for the 2003 harvest - i.e. a premium deduction of 3%.

2003/251 (CNS)

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION amending Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 on the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 37 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission [1],

[1] OJ C ..., ..., p. ...

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament [2],

[2] OJ C ..., ..., p. ...

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee [3],

[3] OJ C ..., ..., p. ...

Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions [4],

[4] OJ C ..., ..., p. ...

Whereas:

(1) Under Article 13(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 [5], the Community Tobacco Fund is to be financed by deductions of 2% and 3% respectively from the premiums for the 2002 and 2003 harvests.

[5] OJ L 215, 30.7.1992, p.70. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).

(2) The reform of the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco, which also covers the Community Tobacco Fund, is currently being drawn up. The new rules are not due to take effect until 2005. A deduction percentage therefore needs to be set for 2004, and in the transitional context it should be maintained at the same level as in 2003.

(3) According to the conclusions of the report on utilisation of the Community Tobacco Fund [6] presented by the Commission to the Concil under Article 13(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92, a 3% deduction will be sufficient to cover the fund's prospective expenditure.

[6] COM(2003) XXXX.

(4) Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 therefore needs to be amended,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 13(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 is replaced by the following:

"1. A Community Tobacco Fund (hereafter "Fund") shall be set up, financed by a deduction of:

- 2% from the premium for the 2002 harvest, and

- 3% from the premium for the 2003 and 2004 harvests."

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels,

For the Council

The President

>TABLE POSITION>
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending November 5, 2011

----

Enforcement            Capital Funding Bancorp, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland, and CFG Community Bank -- issuance of a consent cease and desist order by the Board and the Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation.            -Announced, November 3, 2011                        Huntington Bancshares, Inc., Huntington, Texas -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and the Banking Commissioner of the Texas Department of Banking.            -Announced, November 3, 2011                        Princeton National Bancorp, Inc., Princeton, Illinois -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.            -Announced, November 1, 2011            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
RYAN L. SCHEURMAN

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 4495

______ _______________________/

Opinion filed January 5, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Clay County

. Don H. Lester , Judge

.

Ryan L. Scheurman , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                         WARREN FIVE CENTS SAVINGS BANK
                               DECEMBER 31, 1997

                             -------------------- 
                             WARREN BANCORP, INC.
                             --------------------
                                       |
                                       |
                         ------------------------------
                         WARREN FIVE CENTS SAVINGS BANK
                         ------------------------------
                                       |
                                       |
==============================================================================
          |             |           |               |                |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      NORTHBANK     NORTHBANK    HANNAH           WARREN          PEABODY
      FINANCIAL      REALTY,    BROKERAGE       SECURITIES       COMMUNITY
     CORPORATION      INC.     SERVICE, INC.  CORPORATION II    DEVELOPMENT 
                                (inactive                          CORP.
                                 7/22/94)  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Warren Bancorp, Inc. owns 100% of Warren Five Cents Savings Bank

Warren Five Cents Savings Bank owns 100% of all subsidiaries
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 5:47 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Occidental College Graduate

I would like to make sure that choice of doctors and the choices that the doctors make on 

be half of patients be included in an administrative body of rules to hold objective and 

subjective weight over any administrative medical services rendered to patients through 

medical insurance . Also that a responsibility clause be enforced that requires doctors to 

correct any medical problems which occur under the care of him or her directly in a 

timely manner and if needed before the srtute of medical malpractice law provides. And 

also that current standards of the Hippocratic oath be up held not in an arbitrary old boys 

net work of doctors and lawyers but, under the auspices of a transparent review board 

both state and and federal.
Ex23.1

 

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Chyron Corporation

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-01861 and 333-152205) of Chyron Corporation of our report dated March 23, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

BDO Seidman, LLP

Melville, New York

March 23, 2009
-----Original Message----- 

From: wvz@comcast.net [mailto:wvz@comcast.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:20 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Wilfred Von Zastrow 

423 Tilbury road 

Bloomfield Hills,, MI 48301
#### Reuben Hall, Respondent, v. The City of Buffalo, Appellant.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to strike out answer, etc., denied, with ten dollars costs. *(Wayland*v. Tyson, 45 N. Y. 281; *Thompson*v. *Erie Ry. Co.,*Id., 468; *Grocers' Bank*v. O'Rorke, 6 Hun, 18.)
-----Original Message----- 

From: wsydneystern@comcast.net [mailto:wsydneystern@comcast.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:32 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

WSydney Stern 

374 Bridge Street 

Northampton, MA 01060