alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
East Michigan Flight Standards District Office Willow Run Airport

– East Side

8800 Beck Road Belleville, Michigan 48111

Ph: (734) 487-7222 Fax: (734) 487-7221

May 2, 2014

Hand Delivered

Mr. Doyle C. Sanderlin General Manager Kalitta Air, LLC 818 Willow Run Airport Ypsilanti, MI 48198

Dear Mr. Sanderlin:

Based on current information contained in th e Boeing Weight and Balance Manual sections 1-68-901 and 1-00-001, the practice of carrying a sea/land container on a pallet in an “offset” configuration is not approved and ther efore is not considered safe. Additionally, based on TSO C-90 data, the sea/land container is not considered a Unit Load Device (ULD) when built up in an “offset” configuration.

The current KCSA Ramp Operations Manua l, 20-Foot Sea Container Build-up and Loading/Off-Loading procedures, allows for the use of sea/land containers to be in an “offset” configuration on a palle t; consequently, it must be revi sed to prohibit carriage of sea land containers in an “offset” configur ation until FAA approval can be obtained.

As discussed during our phone conversation of May 2, 2014, the FAA requires and Kalitta Air LLC agrees to immediatel y discontinue the loading a nd transportation of sea/land

containers in an “offset” conf iguration using the cargo loadi ng system for restraint.

Regards,

John Liechty for

Steve Talbott Manager
#### In the Matter of the Distribution of the Surplus Moneys Arising from the Sale of the Real Estate of John Logan, *Deceased.*

— So much of the decree as is appealed from reversed, with costs to the appellant, and the proceedings remitted’to the surrogate’s court of Monroe county, to confirm the report of the referee, and to distribute the fund in accordance therewith. Opinion by

Hardin, J.;

Smith, P. J., not voting.
[MULTIPLIER] 1

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                              PAB BANKSHARES, INC.
                              --------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                              MARCH 31,
                                                      -------------------------
                                                         1998           1997   
                                                      __________     __________
                                                      ----------     ----------
<S>                                                   <C>            <C>       
Basic Earnings Per Share:
-------------------------
  Average shares outstanding                           5,657,884      5,639,240
                                                      ==========     ==========
Diluted Earnings Per Share:
---------------------------
  Average shares outstanding                           5,567,884      5,639,240
                                                      ----------     ----------
  Average options outstanding:
    With exercise price of $12.50                        144,000        144,000
    With exercise price of $20.125                       131,500        131,500
    With exercise price of $24.125                        46,500            -0-
                                                      ----------     ----------
  Proceeds from assumed exercise of options
    outstanding                                       $5,568,251      4,446,438
  Average market price per share during the period    $    28.57          21.75
                                                      ----------     ----------

  Assumed shares repurchased                             194,899        204,398
                                                      ----------     ----------

  Common stock equivalents of options outstanding        127,101         71,102
                                                      ----------     ----------

  Average shares outstanding                           5,784,985      5,710,342
                                                      ==========     ==========

Earnings Per Share:
-------------------
  Net Income                                          $1,330,405      1,018,634
                                                      ==========     ==========

  Basic Earnings Per Share                            $      .24            .18
                                                      ==========     ==========

  Diluted Earnings Per Share                          $      .23            .18
                                                      ==========     ==========
</TABLE>
#### G. Eilers v. The State.

*No. 585.*

*Decided April 20.*

Embezzlement—Criminal Intent Essential.—On a trial for embezzlement, the evidence showed that defendant was employed to collect accounts, receive one-half of amounts collected, and pay the costs of collection. Defendant collected §6.85, and applied one-half of it to payment of court costs, and refused to account to prosecutor for balance, and the evidence showed prosecutor had collected §45, a part of same ac*345counts, and had not accounted to defendant for his share. *Held,*the conviction is not sustained. There must he a fraudulent intent connected with the conversion of money in order to constitute embezzlement.

Appeal from the County Court of Lavaca. Tried below before Hon. P. H. Green, County Judge.

Appellant was convicted of embezzlement of an amount under the value of $20, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $1 and confinement in the county jail for one hour.

The opinion states the facts.

*Bagby & Son,*for appellant.

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of embezzling $6.85 in money belonging to T. H. Pulliam. Pulliam employed appellant to collect about $5000 of old store accounts, and agreed to give him one-half of the collections. Appellant agreed to pay costs of collections, and on this line there was an issue as to whether court costs were included. The testimony left this in doubt. The accounts were turned over to appellant, and some collections were made and suits brought. Pulliam also collected some of the debts, and each seemed to have retained collections made by himself. ^Neither accounted to the other for any of the amounts collected, and there had been no settlement between them. The money alleged to have been converted was collected by appellant from one Creswell. Under appellant’s view of the responsibility of Pulliam for the court costs, he paid Pulliam’s half of the $6.85 to a justice of the peace, in the way of costs on some suits brought by him for Pulliam to force collection of said accounts. These cost bills amounted to $12 or $15, as shown by the evidence of the justice of the peace. Under this state of case, we do not think an embezzlement was shown. The testimony fails to disclose any fraudulent intent or conversion. If it be admitted that $3,421 of the $6.85 paid the justice was Pulliam’s, and appellant had agreed to pay all such costs, yet Pulliam had collected some of the accounts, amounting to not less than $45 or more, and had not accounted to appellant for his half of such collections; and it would be but fair that appellant should apply moneys coming into his hands by reason of such collections to the payment of these amounts due him by Pulliam. There must be a fraudulent intent connected with the conversion of money in order to constitute embezzlement. We do not think this shown in this case, wherefore the judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

*Beversed and remanded.*

Judges all present and concurring.
From: christoph@jps.net [mailto:christoph@jps.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:56 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

c dean 

500 first st 

san rafael, CA 94901
§ 23.43 What are the consultation requirements in the development of recipients' overall goals? ( a ) As a recipient, you must consult with stakeholders before submitting your overall goals to FAA.
( b ) Stakeholders with whom you must consult include, but are not limited to, minority and women's business groups, community organizations, trade associations representing concessionaires currently located at the airport, as well as existing concessionaires themselves, and other officials or organizations which could be expected to have information concerning the availability of disadvantaged businesses, the effects of discrimination on opportunities for ACDBEs, and the recipient's efforts to increase participation of ACDBEs.
( c ) The requirements of this section do not apply if no new concession opportunities will become available during the goal period. However, recipients must take appropriate outreach steps to encourage available ACDBEs to participate as concessionaires whenever there is a concession opportunity.
[70 FR 14508, Mar. 22, 2005, as amended at 89 FR 24961, Apr. 9, 2024]
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

 

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of United Investors Income Properties (the"Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D.Cordes, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, andStephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

This certification isfurnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
-----Original Message----- 

From: clteodori@mac.com [mailto:clteodori@mac.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:11 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Carol Teodori 

300 Cedarhill Drive 

McMurray, PA 15317
#### John Harwood, *Respondent, v.*Thomas D. Beadle, *Appellant.*—

Judgment reversed, reference discharged, costs to abide event. Appeal from order dismissed, with ten dollars costs. Mem. by

Boardman, J.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United Bancorporation of Alabama, Inc. for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert R. Jones, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1).

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2).

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                        |     |                          | 
|----------------------- | --- | ------------------------ | 
|Date: November 13, 2006 |     |                         
|                        | By: | /s/ Robert R. Jones, III | 
|                        |     | Robert R. Jones, III    
|                        |     | President and CEO
#### § 228.315 Vermin control.

Camp cars shall be constructed, equipped, and maintained to prevent the entrance or harborage of rodents, insects, or other vermin. A continuing and effective extermination program shall be instituted where the presence of vermin is detected.
§ 21.11 Conduct of investigations. ( a ) *Periodic compliance reviews.* The Secretary shall from time to time review the practices of recipients to determine whether they are complying with this part.
( b ) *Complaints.* Any person who believes himself or any specific class of persons to be subjected to discrimination prohibited by this part may by himself or by a representative file with the Secretary a written complaint. A complaint must be filed not later than 180 days after the date of the alleged discrimination, unless the time for filing is extended by the Secretary.
( c ) *Investigations.* The Secretary will make a prompt investigation whenever a compliance review, report, complaint, or any other information indicates a possible failure to comply with this part. The investigation will include, where appropriate, a review of the pertinent practices and policies of the recipient, the circumstances under which the possible noncompliance with this part occurred, and other factors relevant to a determination as to whether the recipient has failed to comply with this part.
( d ) *Resolution of matters.* ( 1 ) If an investigation pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section indicates a failure to comply with this part, the Secretary will so inform the recipient and the matter will be resolved by informal means whenever possible. If it has been determined that the matter cannot be resolved by informal means, action will be taken as provided for in § 21.13.
( 2 ) If an investigation does not warrant action pursuant to paragraph (d)(1) of this section the Secretary will so inform the recipient and the complainant, if any, in writing.
( e ) *Intimidatory or retaliatory acts prohibited.* No recipient or other person shall intimidate, threaten, coerce, or discriminate against any individual for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by section 601 of the Act or this part, or because he has made a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this part. The identity of complainants shall be kept confidential except to the extent necessary to carry out the purposes of this part, including the conduct of any investigation, hearing, or judicial proceeding arising thereunder.
[35 FR 10080, June 18, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 72-2, 38 FR 17997, July 5, 1973]
###### Editorial Note on Part 195

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.130 Fabricated assemblies.

Each fabricated assembly to be installed in a pipeline system must meet the applicable requirements of this subpart.
-----Original Message----- 

From: rhwilson20002000@yahoo.com [mailto:rhwilson20002000@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 2:09 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Robert Wilson 

10 Central Ave 

Dalton, MA 01226
-----Original Message----- 

From: jamesjoye@mac.com [mailto:jamesjoye@mac.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:41 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

James Joye 

1224 41ST St 

Sacramento, CA 95819
§ 15.9 Restrictions on the disclosure of SSI. ( a ) *Duty to protect information.* A covered person must— ( 1 ) Take reasonable steps to safeguard SSI in that person's possession or control from unauthorized disclosure. When a person is not in physical possession of SSI, the person must store it a secure container, such as a locked desk or file cabinet or in a locked room.
( 2 ) Disclose, or otherwise provide access to, SSI only to covered persons who have a need to know, unless otherwise authorized in writing by TSA, the Coast Guard, or the Secretary of DOT.
( 3 ) Refer requests by other persons for SSI to TSA or the applicable component or agency within DOT or DHS.
( 4 ) Mark SSI as specified in § 15.13.
( 5 ) Dispose of SSI as specified in § 15.19.
( b ) *Unmarked SSI.* If a covered person receives a record containing SSI that is not marked as specified in § 1520.13, the covered person must— ( 1 ) Mark the record as specified in § 15.13; and
( 2 ) Inform the sender of the record that the record must be marked as specified in § 15.13.
( c ) *Duty to report unauthorized disclosure.* When a covered person becomes aware that SSI has been released to unauthorized persons, the covered person must promptly inform TSA or the applicable DOT or DHS component or agency.
( d ) *Additional requirements for critical infrastructure information.* In the case of information that is both SSI and has been designated as critical infrastructure information under section 214 of the Homeland Security Act, any covered person who is a Federal employee in possession of such information must comply with the disclosure restrictions and other requirements applicable to such information under section 214 and any implementing regulations.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WILSON HARVEY SHAFER, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-653

[February 17, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 

432018CF001138A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sorraya M. 

Solages-Jones, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 235.20 Protests. ( a ) A protest against the granting of an application shall set forth specifically the grounds upon which it is made, and contain a concise statement of the interest of protestant in the proceeding.
( b ) Protests shall be filed with the Associate Administrator for Safety, Federal Railroad Administration, Washington, DC 20590, and one copy shall be furnished to each applicant.
( c ) Protests should be filed within the time limit set forth in the public notice.
( d ) The protestant shall certify that service of a copy of its protest was made upon each applicant.
( e ) Request for hearing must be accompanied with a showing why the protestant is unable to properly present his or her position by written statements.
[49 FR 3380, Jan. 26, 1984, as amended at 74 FR 25174, May 27, 2009] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 49 FR 3380, Jan. 26, 1984, part 235 was revised. Section 235.20 contains information collection and recordkeeping requirements and will not become effective until approval has been given by the Office of Management and Budget.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 46607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4111]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


The President's Export Council: Meeting of the President's Export 
Council; Correction

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a time change for an open meeting via teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The President's Export Council will hold a meeting via 
teleconference to deliberate a draft letter of recommendation to the 
President. This meeting was announced in a Federal Register document 
published on August 13, 2007 (72 FR 45224). This notice corrects the 
time of that meeting.
    Date: August 23, 2007.
    Time: 1 p.m. (EDT); Correction.
    For the Conference Call-In Number and Further Information, Contact: 
The President's Export Council Executive Secretariat, Room 4043, 
Washington, DC 20230 (Phone: 202-482-1124), or visit the PEC Web site, 
http://www.ita.doc.gov/td/pec.

    Dated: August 16, 2007.
J. Marc Chittum,
Executive Secretary and Staff Director, President's Export Council.
[FR Doc. 07-4111 Filed 8-17-07; 9:33 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-101 

________________________________________________________________________ 

FISHERIES 

Pacific Salmon 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CANADA 

Amending Annex IV to the 

Treaty of January 28, 1985, as 

Amended 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Washington December 23, 2008 

with 

Appendix 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
CANADA 

Fisheries: Pacific Salmon 

 Agreement amending Annex IV of 

 the treaty of January 28, 1985, as amended. 

 Effected by exchange of notes at Washington 

 December 23, 2008; 

 Entered into force January 1, 2009. 

 With appendix.