alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the 

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the 

Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound 

volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 23-BG-0069

IN RE LANE N. BENNETT, ESQUIRE,

DDN: 2022-61

A Member of the Bar of the 

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 990546

BEFORE: Blackburne-Rigsby, Chief Judge, and Easterly and Howard, Associate 

Judges. 

O R D E R

(FILED—April 13, 2023)

On consideration of the certified copy of an order from the state of Louisiana 

suspending respondent from the practice of law for three years; this court’s February 

6, 2023, order suspending respondent pending disposition of this matter and 

directing him to show cause why the functional equivalent reciprocal discipline of a 

three-year suspension with a fitness requirement should not be imposed; and the 

statement of Disciplinary Counsel wherein he requests that reinstatement be 

conditioned upon respondent’s reinstatement in Louisiana; and it appearing that 

respondent has not filed a response or his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit, it is 

ORDERED that Lane N. Bennett is hereby suspended from the practice of 

law in the District of Columbia for three years with reinstatement contingent on his 

reinstatement to practice law in the state of Louisiana and a showing of fitness. See

In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483, 487-88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that there is a rebuttable 

presumption in favor of imposition of identical discipline and exceptions to this 

presumption should be rare); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) 

(explaining that a rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to 

all cases in which the respondent does not participate); see also In re Hoffman, 267 

A.3d 1016 (D.C. 2022) (conditioning eligibility to seek reinstatement on 

readmission in original disciplining jurisdiction). It is
No. 23-BG-0069

FURTHER ORDERED that, for purposes of reinstatement, Mr. Bennett’s

suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully 

complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g). 

PER CURIAM
----

|   | (1). | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2). | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. |
|--------|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                              |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| Date: May 13, 2011                                |
|                                              |
| /s/ Allen O. Jones, Jr.                           |
| Allen O. Jones, Jr.                               |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                     |

----
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending January 19, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|APPLE CREEK BKG CO, APPLE CREEK, OHIO | 213912 | 09/04/2012 | 01/03/2013     | S         | Small Bank 
|FIFTH THIRD BK, CINCINNATI, OHIO      | 723112 | 11/14/2011 | 01/03/2013     | S         | Large Bank 
|NORTH VALLEY BK, ZANESVILLE, OHIO     | 783910 | 06/18/2012 | 01/03/2013     | S         | Small Bank 
|PEOPLES B&TC, HAZARD, KENTUCKY        | 814711 | 08/20/2012 | 01/03/2013     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 13, 1995 (94), Para 94.40 Time Limitation of Referred Bill]
[Page 1134]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.94.40  time limitation of referred bill

  Pursuant to clause 5 of rule X the following action was taken by the 
Speaker:

       Referral to Commerce of H.R. 1122 extended July 13, 1995, 
     for a period ending not later than October 16, 1995.
```
Editorial Note on Part 190
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 190 appear at 78 FR 58908, Sept. 25, 2013.

§ 190.209 Case file. ( a ) The case file, as defined in this section, is available to the respondent in all enforcement proceedings conducted under this subpart.
( b ) The case file of an enforcement proceeding consists of the following: ( 1 ) In cases commenced under § 190.206, the notice of amendment and the relevant procedures;
( 2 ) In cases commenced under § 190.207, the notice of probable violation and the violation report;
( 3 ) In cases commenced under § 190.233, the corrective action order or notice of proposed corrective action order and the data report, if one is prepared;
( 4 ) In cases commenced under § 190.239, the notice of proposed safety order;
( 5 ) Any documents and other material submitted by the respondent in response to the enforcement action;
( 6 ) In cases involving a hearing, any material submitted during and after the hearing as set forth in § 190.211; and
( 7 ) The Regional Director's written evaluation of response material submitted by the respondent and recommendation for final action, if one is prepared.
[Amdt. 190-16, 78 FR 58910, Sept. 25, 2013]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Repro-Med Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), I, Andrew
I. Sealfon, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

    (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results

Date: October 15, 2010

/s/ Andrew I. Sealfon
Andrew I. Sealfon
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
From: michaelprete@cox.net [mailto:michaelprete@cox.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:35 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Michael Prete 

1515 East Edison Street 

Tucson, AZ 85719
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 1998
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                  1,089
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,089
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      35
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,089
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          258
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              64
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           194
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       194
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              194
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            6.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                            6.58
        

</TABLE>
#### § 217.4 Definitions.

As used in this part—

*Associate Administrator for Safety* means the Associate Administrator for Safety of the Federal Railroad Administration or that person's delegate as designated in writing.

*Class I,* *Class II,* and *Class III* have the meaning assigned by regulations of the Interstate Commerce Commission (49 CFR part 1201; General Instructions 1-1), as those regulations may be revised and applied by order of the Commission (including modifications in class thresholds based revenue deflator adjustments).

*Division headquarters* means the location designated by the railroad where a high-level operating manager (*e.g.,* a superintendent, division manager, or equivalent), who has jurisdiction over a portion of the railroad, has an office.

*FRA* means the Federal Railroad Administration.

*Qualified* means that a person has successfully completed all instruction, training, and examination programs required by the railroad and this part and that the person, therefore, has actual knowledge or may reasonably be expected to have knowledge of the subject on which the person is expected to be competent.

*System headquarters* means the location designated by the railroad as the general office for the railroad system.

[59 FR 43070, Aug. 22, 1994, as amended at 73 FR 8496, Feb. 13, 2008]
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.487 Remedial measures: Distribution lines other than cast iron or ductile iron lines. ( a ) *General corrosion.* Except for cast iron or ductile iron pipe, each segment of generally corroded distribution line pipe with a remaining wall thickness less than that required for the MAOP of the pipeline, or a remaining wall thickness less than 30 percent of the nominal wall thickness, must be replaced. However, corroded pipe may be repaired by a method that reliable engineering tests and analyses show can permanently restore the serviceability of the pipe. Corrosion pitting so closely grouped as to affect the overall strength of the pipe is considered general corrosion for the purpose of this paragraph.
( b ) *Localized corrosion pitting.* Except for cast iron or ductile iron pipe, each segment of distribution line pipe with localized corrosion pitting to a degree where leakage might result must be replaced or repaired.
[Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12302, June 30, 1971, as amended by Amdt. 192-88, 64 FR 69665, Dec. 14, 1999]
Exhibit 31-1



Certification

I, James P. Laurito, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  March 14, 2005 | /s/James P. Laurito       James P. Laurito
       President
|--------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7625

IGNATZIO GIULIANO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District 

Judge. (6:10-cv-02485-MBS)

Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 9, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ignatzio Giuliano, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ignatzio Giuliano, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 

(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Giuliano v. Warden, No. 

6:10-cv-02485-MBS (D.S.C. Nov. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
###### Editorial Note on Part 195

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.304 Test pressure.

The test pressure for each pressure test conducted under this subpart must be maintained throughout the part of the system being tested for at least 4 continuous hours at a pressure equal to 125 percent, or more, of the maximum operating pressure and, in the case of a pipeline that is not visually inspected for leakage during the test, for at least an additional 4 continuous hours at a pressure equal to 110 percent, or more, of the maximum operating pressure.

[Amdt. 195-51, 59 FR 29384, June 7, 1994. Redesignated by Amdt. 195-65, 63 FR 59480, Nov. 4, 1998]
From: teh13@mac.com [mailto:teh13@mac.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 4:46 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Terrence Higgins 

275 Bolinas Road 

Fairfax, CA 94930
|EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement File No. 333-102008 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 30, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation and its subsidiaries, management's report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the consolidated financial statement schedules contained in Schedule II, Item 15 (our report on the consolidated financial statements expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs regarding the sale of the Company's interest in Catamount Energy Corporation and regarding the restatement of the 2004 and 2003 consolidated financial statements and our report on internal control over financial reporting expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 2006
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message----- 

From: pj12161@hotmail.com [mailto:pj12161@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 12:05 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Philip Brzezinski 

101 Church St. 

Waldron, MI 49288
#### § 179.300-7 Materials.

(a) Steel plate material used to fabricate tanks must conform with the following specifications with the indicated minimum tensile strength and elongation in the welded condition. However, the maximum allowable carbon content for carbon steel must not exceed 0.31 percent, although the individual ASTM specification may allow for a greater amount of carbon. The plates may be clad with other approved materials:

| Specifications2 | Tensile strength (psi) welded condition1 (minimum) | Elongation in 2 inches (percent) welded condition1 (longitudinal) (minimum) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| ASTM A 240/A 240M type 304 | 75,000 | 25 |
| ASTM A 240/A 240M type 304L | 70,000 | 25 |
| ASTM A 240/A 240M type 316 | 75,000 | 25 |
| ASTM A 240/A 240M type 316L | 70,000 | 25 |
| ASTM A 240/A 240M type 321 | 75,000 | 25 |
| ASTM A 285 Gr. A | 45,000 | 29 |
| ASTM A 285 Gr. B | 50,000 | 20 |
| ASTM A 285 Gr. C | 55,000 | 20 |
| ASTM A 515/A 515M Gr. 65 | 65,000 | 20 |
| ASTM A 515/A 515M Gr. 70 | 70,000 | 20 |
| ASTM A 516/A 516M Gr. 70 | 70,000 | 20 |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Maximum stresses to be used in calculations. | | |
| 2 These specifications are incorporated by reference (IBR, see [§ 171.7 of this subchapter](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-171.7).) | | |

(b) [Reserved]

(c) All plates must have their heat number and the name or brand of the manufacturer legibly stamped on them at the rolling mill.

[Amdt. 179-10, [36 FR 21355](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/36-FR-21355), Nov. 6, 1971, as amended by Amdt. 179-42, [54 FR 38798](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/54-FR-38798), Sept. 20, 1989; Amdt. 179-43, [55 FR 27642](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/55-FR-27642), July 5, 1990; Amdt. 179-52, [61 FR 28682](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-28682), June 5, 1996; Amdt. 179-52, [61 FR 50255](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-50255), Sept. 25, 1996; Amdt. 179-53, [61 FR 51342](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-51342), Oct. 1, 1996; [68 FR 75763](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/68-FR-75763), Dec. 31, 2003]