alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Event

DateAmb. Temp. (F)Rel. Humid (%) Gen. Amb. (Sunny,

Cloudy, Rain, Snow) 

### Product (FeMn, SiMn, MOR) Bldg/Furnace (F1,

F12, MOR) Tapping, Cast-Ladle, Ladle Pour, Ladle Transfer, Slag

Rake-off, MOR Transfer, MOR Reaction, Cast-Nest Duration Opacity Reading (%) 3/6/2013 34 84 Cloudy HC FeMn F1 Tapping/Cast-Ladle 19 min. 5 - 40 Ladle Pour/Transfer 6 min. 0 - 30 Slag Rake-off 6 min. 0 - 15 MOR Transfer 2 min. 0



## Event

DateAmb. Temp. (F)Rel. Humid (%) Gen. Amb. (Sunny,

Cloudy, Rain, Snow) 

### Product (FeMn, SiMn, MOR) Bldg/Furnace (F1,

F12, MOR) Tapping, Cast-Ladle, Ladle Pour, Ladle Transfer, Slag

Rake-off, MOR Transfer, MOR Reaction, Cast-Nest Duration Opacity Reading (%) 3/11/2013 59 46 Rain HC FeMn F1 Tapping/Cast-Ladle 17 min. 0 - 10 Ladle Pour/Transfer 5 min. 0 - 30 Slag Rake-off 6 min. 0 - 15 MOR Transfer 8 min. 0 - 15



## Event

DateAmb. Temp. (F)Rel. Humid (%) Gen. Amb. (Sunny,

Cloudy, Rain, Snow) 

### Product (FeMn, SiMn, MOR) Bldg/Furnace (F1,

F12, MOR) Tapping, Cast-Ladle, Ladle Pour, Ladle Transfer, Slag

Rake-off, MOR Transfer, MOR Reaction, Cast-Nest Duration Opacity Reading (%) 4/2/2013 33 39 Sunny SiMn F12 Tapping/Cast-Ladle 22 min. 0 - 25 Ladle Pour/Transfer 10 min. 10 - 20 Slag Rake-off 3 min. 10 - 20 Ladle Transfer/Cast-Nest 7 min. 5 - 50



## Event

DateAmb. Temp. (F)Rel. Humid (%) Gen. Amb. (Sunny,

Cloudy, Rain, Snow) 

### Product (FeMn, SiMn, MOR) Bldg/Furnace (F1,

F12, MOR) Tapping, Cast-Ladle, Ladle Pour, Ladle Transfer, Slag

Rake-off, MOR Transfer, MOR Reaction, Cast-Nest Duration Opacity Reading (%) 4/3/2013 35 42 Sunny SiMn F12 Tapping/Cast-Ladle 12 min. 0 - 35 Ladle Pour/Transfer 6 min. 5 - 30 Slag Rake-off 6 min. 0 - 20 Ladle Transfer/Cast-Nest 9 min. 5 - 40 

## Secondary Furnace Processes Visible Emissions Measurement
#### Catharine Fagan, *Respondent, v.*Samuel H. Gurney, *Appellant*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Mem. by

Learned, P. J.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 10, 1995 (125), Para 125.5 Communications]
[Page 1496]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.125.5  communications

  Executive and other communications, pursuant to clause 2, rule XXIV, 
were referred as follows:

       1495. A letter from the President and Chairman, Export-
     Import Bank of the United States, transmitting a report 
     involving United States exports to Pakistan, pursuant to 12 
     U.S.C. 635(b)(3)(i); to the Committee on Banking and 
     Financial Services.
       1496. A letter from the Director, Defense Security 
     Assistance Agency, transmitting notification concerning the 
     Department of the Air Force's proposed Letter(s) of Offer and 
     Acceptance [LOA] to Korea for defense articles and services 
     (Transmittal No. 96-02), pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 2776(b); to 
     the Committee on International Relations.
       1497. A letter from the Director, Defense Security 
     Assistance Agency, transmitting notification concerning the 
     Department of the Air Force's proposed Letter(s) of Offer and 
     Acceptance [LOA] to Saudi Arabia for defense articles and 
     services (Transmittal No. 96-03), pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 
     2776(b); to the Committee on International Relations.
       1498. A letter from the Assistant Secretary for Legislative 
     Affairs, Department of State, transmitting a report to 
     Congress on South Africa's status as an adherent to the 
     Missile Technology Control Regime [MTCR], pursuant to 22 
     U.S.C. 2797b-1; to the Committee on International Relations.
       1499. A letter from the Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty 
     Affairs, Department of State, transmitting copies of 
     international agreements, other than treaties, entered into 
     by the United States, pursuant to 1 U.S.C. 112b(a); to the 
     Committee on International Relations.
       1500. A letter from the Chief, Retirement Branch, 
     Department of the Air Force, transmitting the annual report 
     for the Air Force nonapropriated fund retirement plan for the 
     plan year ending September 30, 1994, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 
     9503(a)(1)(B); to the Committee on Government Reform and 
     Oversight.
```
#### Marcus L. Bagley, *Respondent, v.*Hector Shaw, Appellant.—

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 52004AP0081

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003 establishing a levy in the milk and milk products sector (COM(2004)0710 — C6-0170/2004 — 2004/0253(CNS))***Official Journal 226 E , 15/09/2005 P. 0041 - 0041*

P6_TA(2004)0081

Support schemes for farmers/Milk and milk products *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003 establishing a levy in the milk and milk products sector (COM(2004)0710 — C6-0170/2004 — 2004/0253(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2004)0710) [1],

- having regard to Article 37(2), third subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0170/2004),

- having regard to Rules 51 and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture (A6-0036/2004),

1. Approves the Commission proposal;

2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

3. Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

4. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pressure BioSciences, Inc., a
Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  “Report”),  Richard T. Schumacher, President and Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of Pressure BioSciences, Inc., a
Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) that:





(1)          The 
Report  of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      March 31, 2009
              /s/ Richard T.
SchumacherRichard
      T. SchumacherPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Financial Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pressure BioSciences, Inc., and will be retained by Pressure BioSciences, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, July 11, 1995 (92), Para 92.7 Providing for the Further Consideration of H.R. 1868]
[Page 1104]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.92.7  providing for the further consideration of h.r. 1868

  Mr. GOSS, by direction of the Committee on Rules, called up the 
following resolution (H. Res. 177):

       Resolved, That during further consideration of H.R. 1868 
     pursuant to House Resolution 170, consideration of the bill 
     for amendment in the Committee of the Whole House on the 
     state of the Union shall proceed without intervening motion 
     except the amendments printed in the report of the Committee 
     on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each of those 
     amendments may be considered only in the order printed in the 
     report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the 
     report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 
     twenty minutes equally divided and controlled by the 
     proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, 
     and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the 
     question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All 
     points of order against amendments printed in the report are 
     waived. The chairman of the Committee of the Whole may 
     postpone until a time during further consideration in the 
     Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any 
     amendment made in order by this resolution. The chairman of 
     the Committee of the Whole may reduce to not less than five 
     minutes the time for voting by electronic device on any 
     postponed question that immediately follows another vote by 
     electronic device without intervening business, provided that 
     the time for voting by electronic device on the first in any 
     series of questions shall be not less than fifteen minutes. 
     Immediately after disposition of the amendments printed in 
     the report, the Committee shall rise and report the bill to 
     the House with such amendments as may have been adopted.

  When said resolution was considered.
  After debate,
  Mr. GOSS moved the previous question on the resolution to its adoption 
or rejection.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House now order the previous question?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. DICKEY, announced that the yeas had it.
  Mr. HALL of Ohio objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was 
not present and not voting.
  A quorum not being present,
  The roll was called under clause 4, rule XV, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

Yeas

236

When there appeared

Nays

162
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



CERTIFICATION



I, Jefferson F. Allen, Chief Executive Officer of Premcor Inc. (the Company), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, do hereby certify as follows with respect to the Company:



| | 1. | The annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification on this 28th day of February 2005.



By:

/s/    Jefferson F. AllenChief Executive Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Premcor Inc. and will be retained by Premcor Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending December 29, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
June 24, 2013

Memo to: EPA Docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0268)

Subject: Summary of June 2013 presentation/webinar for federal and state ER partners 

regarding updates to the Protective Action Guides (PAGs) Manual

On June 20, 2013, EPA staff gave a short presentation via webinar on the proposal for public 

comment: “PAG Manual: Protective Action Guides and Planning Guidance for Radiological 

Incidents.” The presentation provided a brief overview of the differences between the current 

(1992) and newly proposed PAG Manuals and staff answered several questions. Emergency 

response partners from federal and state radiation programs participated.
APR. 14.2014 II: 50AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 

U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

APR 14 2014 

Via Facsimile 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law J~1dge 

Eastern Region 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Otl1ce of Administrative Law Judges 

Office of Hearings, Attn: Room Ell-31 0 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

FAX 202-366-7536 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy). 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Atto: l,learing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilb\jf Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000 

FAX 202- 493-5142 

NO. 8446 P 2/2 

I Aviation Plaza 

Room 561 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Telephone: 718-553-3272 

Facsimile: 718-995-5699 

Re: In the Matter of the Matter of Radio Holland USA, Inc. 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0286 

FAA Docket No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

Dear Judge Goodwin and Hearing Docket Clerk: 

This is to confirm that the patties to the above-referenced matter have reached a settlement. 

Therefore, Respondent, Radio Holland, withdrew its request for a hearing on April 9, 2014 

and the Contplainant, FAA, hereby withdraws its complaint. 

Please tee! free to call me at (7i8) 553-3272 if you have any questions or concerns. 

s~· cerely 

·»------

J ine C. Gotimer 

Attorney 

cc: Anacarolina Estaba, Respondent;s Counsel 

Gardete Wynne Sewell LLP 

FAX (713)276-6398 
APR 14 2014 11:50AM , FA A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-1 

To: 

Company: 

NO. 8446 P 112 

Federal Avi.atlon 

Administration 

Aegion'll Counsel's Office 

1 AViEltion Pl~za, Rcom 561 

Jamaica, New York 11434 

T 718~553-

F 718-995-5699 

Fax: ,)-0~3~~ 1~.s(./,;2-d;;<-#f3- 6/.¢~113-;)?f,-&S'It' Ename 

From:~~.~~.;{%, · · 

Titie: 

Date: ~/,.;(/8-o/-f 

Pages: r 

... -----·- .. ·····-····· ..... --------·-·· ---------· ---------. ' ------ " --------. ·-·····-------· N ------ 0 • ··--•-•-"' 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE 

This facsimile and the document(s) accompanying this facsimile transmission contuin confidential 

information that is legally privileged. The infonnation is intended only for the use of the recipient 

named above. If you have received this facsimile in emJT, please i!l'Jllediately notify this office by 

telephone. You are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking any action in 

reliance on rhe contem of thio facsimile information is strictly prohibited.
Office of Transportation and Air Quality

EPA-420-B-12-022c

August 2012

EMTS System Changes

The following EMTS system changes are planned for the upcoming release of the EMTS.

Version 2.1 – Tentatively scheduled for release in August 2012

1. A given organization may not submit multiple files with the same name in a given 

calendar year.

2. In buy and sell transactions, only organizations that have enabled business activities that 

allow them to buy and sell RINs will be available in EMTS as trading partner

organizations.

Questions?

Please send all questions to support@epamts-support.com.
-----Original Message----- 

From: jtavrow@gmail.com [mailto:jtavrow@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:32 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Joyce Tavrow 

899 Charleston Rd. L 403 

Palo Alto, CA 94303
SERIES A 12% SUBORDINATED CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE

DUE DECEMBER 31, 2004

CHYRON CORPORATION

THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE "ACT"), AND ARE SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFERABILITY AS SET FORTH IN THIS CERTIFICATE.  THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED HEREBY MAY NOT BE SOLD, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF IN THE ABSENCE OF AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE ACT OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL, REASONABLY ACCEPTABLE TO COUNSEL FOR THE COMPANY, TO THE EFFECT THAT THE PROPOSED SALE, TRANSFER, OR DISPOSITION MAY BE EFFECTUATED WITHOUT REGISTRATION UNDER THE ACT.
••"-ARTMENTOF 

SERVED FEBRUARY 11 , 2011 r • iSPORTATiON 

^'.(•-T OPERA:' " • 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ?j | ffg j j p 2^ LiO 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

TRISHAN AIR, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10WP0013 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNO. FAA-2010-1218 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2007WP010061) has been assigned to 

Adininistrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

V (?-S 

^"FCminie A. Yode 

Chief Administrative^^W'Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
mmm .

FAA Docket No. CP10WP0013 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, 

Wilbur Wright Building 

Louis S. Franecke, Respondent's Coun^l 

Franecke Law Group 

1115 Irwin Street, Suite 100 

Sam Rafael, C A 94901 

TEL: 415-457-7040 

FAX: 415-457-7041 , 

Don Bobertz, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7 » -

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, C A 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-3454 ^ 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

^^} -

&li;? :.iBil, 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, AiinifliS:^^^^^S^f0 Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room Eli-SSO 

Washington, DC 20590 I " " 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attomey-Advisci 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant I 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

\ • 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in pei 

Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Af < 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, A' 

jietiuicff, use the following a&iress: Federal 

Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

- !
-----Original Message----- 

From: shamrockdh@yahoo.com [mailto:shamrockdh@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 8:22 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Donald Hall 

3775 Sommers St. 

Jacksonville, FL 32205
#### George W. Venables, Appellant, v. George Sweeley Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6793

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM HAZEL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District

Judge. (2:92-cr-00163-1; 3:05-cv-00611-REP)

Submitted: September 22, 2006 Decided: October 26, 2006

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Hazel, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant

United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

William Hazel, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court's order construing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and dismissing it as

successive. Although Hazel alternatively sought, and received,

transfer of his § 2241 petition from the District of Kansas, his

place of confinement, to the Eastern District of Virginia, the

sentencing court, Hazel states that he intended to file a § 2241

petition raising a challenge to the manner in which his sentence

was calculated. Judicial review of a § 2241 petition must be

sought in the district of confinement rather than the sentencing

court. In re: Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 333 (4th Cir. 2000). In cases

such as this one, where relief pursuant to § 2241 is sought in the

sentencing court, the court is without jurisdiction to consider the

request. On this basis, we affirm the district court’s dismissal

of Hazel’s § 2241 petition without prejudice for lack of

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00746-CV

V. C., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY 

NO. D-1-FM-17-003321, THE HONORABLE DUSTIN M. HOWELL,

JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant V. C. filed her notice of appeal on November 7, 2018. The appellate 

record was complete December 3, 2018, making appellant’s brief due December 27, 2018. 

On December 5, 2018, counsel for appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file

appellant’s brief.

The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals 

from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days 

for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting 

extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion and order counsel to file appellant’s brief 

no later than January 7, 2019. If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to 

show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court.
2

It is ordered on December 13, 2018.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Field and Toth