alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Paulson Capital Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chester L.F.Paulson, President of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Chester  L.F. Paulson    |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Chester L.F.  Paulson        |
| President                    |
| Principal  Executive Officer |
| May 12, 2003                 |

 

----
### 33-15-03-04. Exceptions. 

### 4. [Reserved] 

## 5. . , However, agricultural practices such as tilling ofland, application offertilizers, harvesting ofcrops, and other 

### 2activities shall be managed in such a manner as to minimize dustfrom becoming airborne. History: Amended effective February 1, 1982; January 1, 2013. General Authority: NDCC 23-25-03, 28-32-02 Law Implemented: NDCC 23-25-03



### 3
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 25, 1995 (73), Para 73.7 Appointment of Conferees--H.R.483]
[Page 817]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.73.7  appointment of conferees--h.r.483

  Thereupon, the SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, by unanimous consent, 
announced the appointment of Messrs. Bliley, Bilirakis, Hastert, Archer, 
Thomas, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Dingell, Waxman, Gibbons, and, 
Stark as managers on the part of the House at said conference.
  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate of the foregoing 
appointments.
```
#### Edward Schell, *as Trustee, etc., Respondent, v.*Theodore Y. Brown, *Appellant.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY WATER HEATER WORKSHOP June24, 1997 U.S. DepartmentofEnergy 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Room 1E-245 Purpose ofWorkshop: The objective ofthe workshop will be to discussthe process and methodology to be utilized throughout the water heater standards rulemaking process. Outcomes ofWorkshop: To agree upon the process and the tools to be used for the water heater rulemaking. Determination onhow to proceed with screening and engineering analysis. Draft Agenda 9:00 - 9:30 am Opening Remarks, Introductions, Agenda Review 9:30 - 9:45 am Overview ofWater Heater Rulemaking Schedule 9:45 - 10:30 am Open Discussion on Rulemaking Framework

- Issues for Analysis

- Analytical Methods and Tools

- DataRequirement andData Collection Methods

- Industry Characterization

- Identification ofExperts and Other Interested Parties

- Identification ofContractor Qualifications 10:30 - 10:45 am Break 10:45 - Noon Continue Discussion on Rulemaking Framework Noon - 1:00pm Lunch (On your own)

1:00 - 2:15 pm Discussion on Technology Assessment and Screening Analysis 2:15 - 2:30 pm Break 2:30 - 3:00 pm Issues to be Resolved 3:00 - 3:30 pm Next Steps 3:30 - 3:45pm Open Discussion on How to Improve FutureWorkshops 3:45 - 4:00pm Closing Remarks - Adjournment
August 3,201 0 

STATE OF TENNESSEE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 

Division of Air Pollution Control 

9Ih lo or, L&C Annex 

401 Church Street 

Nashville, TN 37243-1 531 

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL 

TRACKING NUMBER 7007 0220 0004 1449 8220 

A. Stanley Meiburg, Acting Regional Administrator 

U. S. EPA Region 4 

Atlanta Federal Center, 12* Floor 

61 Forsyth Street, SW 

Atlanta, GA 30303-8960 

Re: Request for Parallel Review, Pre-Hearing Draft 

Nashville 1 lO(a)(l) Maintenance Plan for the 1997 &hour Ozone NAAQS 

Dear Mr. Meiburg: 

I am pleased to submit the Pre-Hearing draft of the 8-hour Ozone Maintenance plan for the Middle 

Tennessee &hour Ozone Maintenance Area (1997 Standard). The draft 8-hour Ozone Maintenance Plan 

provides for continued attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) 

in the Middle Tennessee Area, fulfilling the requirements of Section 110(a)(l) of the Clean Air Act. 

The area was designated to attainment by EPA in April, 2008. The emissions projections presented in this 

document demonstrate that the area is expected to maintain the 8-hour ozone standard throughout the 

maintenance period. 

The public comment period began on July 29,2010, and will run until the public hearing date of August 31, 

2010. We intend to submit the final plan to EPA in mid-September 2010, and we request that EPA parallel 

process this request as we move through the comment period. 

If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please contact me at (615) 532-0554. 

Sincerelv. 

~irekor, ~iv'ision of Air Pollution Control
Filed 06/29/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court



### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOT A

2020 ND 137

Stonea rt OFS LLC, d/b/a Scotty Fain Construction a nd Scotty Fain, Individually, Appellant

v.
North Dakota Workforce Safety and Insurance Fund, Appellee

No. 20200063

Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Benjamen J. Johnson , Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Stephen D. Little, Bismarck, ND, for appella nt.

Jacqueline S. Anderson, Special Assistant Attorney General, Fargo, ND

, for appellee.1 Stoneart OFS LLC v. WSI No. 20200063

Per Curiam

. [¶1] Stoneart OFS LLC d/b/a Scotty Fain Construction, and Scotty Fain individually (together “Fain”), appeal ed from a district court judgment affirming an administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) order determining Dennis Teems was acting as Fain’s employee during an accident that resulted in
Teems’ death.

[¶2] Fain asserts there is no evidence Teems was performing services for remuneration and therefore the ALJ improperly applied the statutory presumption that Teems was an employee. See N.D.C.C. § 65

- 01

- 03(1) (stating an individual who performs services for remuneration is presumed to be an employee unless it is proven he or she is an independent contractor under the common law test).

[¶3] We conclude the ALJ’s finding that Teems was perfo rming services for remuneration is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. See SAEJ Enter., LLC v. Workforce Safety and Ins. , 2020 ND 61, ¶ 3, 940 N.W. 2d 611 (applying the preponderance of the evidence standard to an ALJ’s finding of fact). We sum marily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).

[¶4] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
§ 1503.643 Public disclosure of evidence. This section applies to information other than Sensitive Security Information (SSI). All release of SSI is governed by § 1503.415 and 49 CFR part 1520. ( a ) The ALJ may order that any other information contained in the record be withheld from public disclosure. Any person may object to disclosure of information in the record by filing a written motion to withhold specific information with the ALJ and serving a copy of the motion on each party. The party must state the specific grounds for nondisclosure in the motion.
( b ) The ALJ must grant the motion to withhold information in the record if, based on the motion and any response to the motion, the ALJ determines that disclosure would be detrimental to transportation safety, disclosure would not be in the public interest, or that the information is not otherwise required to be made available to the public.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 24, 1995 (133), Para 133.28 Education, Employment, and Rehabilitation Systems]
[Page 1586]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.133.28  education, employment, and rehabilitation systems

  On motion of Mr. GOODLING, by unanimous consent, the bill (H.R. 1617) 
to consolidate and reform workforce development and literacy programs, 
and for other purposes; together with the amendments of the Senate 
thereto, was taken from the Speaker's table.
  When on motion of Mr. GOODLING, it was,
  Resolved, That the House disagree to the amendments of the Senate and 
agree to the conference asked by the Senate on the disagreeing votes of 
the two Houses thereon.
  Thereupon, the SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BLUTE, by unanimous consent, 
announced the appointment of the following Members as managers on the 
part of the House at said conference:

  Messrs. Goodling, Gunderson, Cunningham, McKeon, Riggs, Graham, 
Souder, Clay, Williams, Kildee, Sawyer, and Gene Green of Texas.

  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate thereof.
```
§ 565.7 Effective dates. ( a ) *Generally.* Except for service contracts, the rates, charges, classifications, rules or regulations of controlled carriers may not, unless the Commission has granted special permission, become effective sooner than the 30th day after the date of publication.
( b ) *Open rates* — ( 1 ) *Generally.* Controlled carriers that are members of conference agreements publishing rates for commodities designated as open by the conference are subject to the 30-day controlled carrier notice requirement, except when special permission is granted by the Commission under § 565.8.
( 2 ) *Conference publication of reduced open rates.* Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(1) of this section, a conference may, on less than 30 days' notice, publish reduced rates on behalf of controlled carrier members for open-rated commodities: ( i ) At or above the minimum level set by the conference; or
( ii ) At or above the level set by a member of the conference that has not been determined by the Commission to be a controlled carrier subject to section 9 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. 40701-40706).
( c ) *Independent action rates of controlled carriers.* Conferences may publish on behalf of their controlled carrier members lower independent action rates on less than 30 days' notice, subject to the requirements of their basic agreements and subject to such rates being published at or above the level set by a member of the conference that has not been determined by the Commission to be a controlled carrier subject to section 9 of the Shipping Act of 1984.
[64 FR 8010, Feb. 18, 1999, as amended at 74 FR 50735, Oct. 1, 2009]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2298 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2298

To amend the Agricultural Act of 1949 to clarify the prevented planting 
            rule for the calculation of crop acreage bases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 1995

 Mr. Bereuter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Agricultural Act of 1949 to clarify the prevented planting 
            rule for the calculation of crop acreage bases.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EFFECT OF PREVENTED PLANTING ON CALCULATION OF CROP ACREAGE 
              BASES.

    Section 503(f) of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1463(f)) 
is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``on the acreage of 
        such farm'' and all that follows through the period at the end 
        of the sentence and inserting ``on the failed acreage or any 
        other acreage of the farm consistent with the conservation plan 
        for the farm prepared in accordance with section 1212 of the 
        Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3812).''; and
            (2) in the second sentence--
                    (A) by inserting after ``subsection'' the 
                following: ``(but not to exceed the total of the failed 
                acreage)''; and
                    (B) by striking ``such acreage'' and inserting 
                ``the substitute acreage''.
                                 <all>
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: ajsussel@comcast.net [mailto:ajsussel@comcast.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 2:40 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Andrea J. Sussel, LCSW 

2947 Mapleshade Road 

Ardmore, PA 19003 

Sincerely, 

Andrea Sussel 

2947 Mapleshade Road 

Ardmore, PA 19003
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paulson Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Karen L. Johannes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Karen L. Johannes                                                            
|Karen L. Johannes Chief Financial Officer
Paulson Capital Corp. November 14, 2008

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Paulson Capital Corp. and will be retained by Paulson Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CFO CERTIFICATION**
I, Derek J. Kerr, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of America WestHoldings Corporation;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b)  [intentionally omitted]  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: April 26, 2005 /s/ Derek J. Kerr
PUBLIC LAW 113–1—JAN. 6, 2013 127 STAT. 3 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 41: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013): 

Jan. 4, considered and passed House and Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–1 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the National Flood Insurance Program. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN BORROWING AUTHORITY FOR 

NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM. 

(a) Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 

1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘$20,725,000,000’’ 

and inserting ‘‘$30,425,000,000’’. 

(b) The amount provided by this section is designated by the 

Congress as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 403(a) 

of S. Con. Res. 13 (111th Congress), the concurrent resolution 

on the budget for fiscal year 2010, and as an emergency pursuant 

to section 4(g) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (2 U.S.C. 

933(g)). 

Approved January 6, 2013. 

Jan. 6, 2013 

[H.R. 41] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
#### § 212.109 Joint planning of inspections.

Prior to the beginning of each calendar year, each participating State applying for grant assistance under subpart D of this part shall develop, in conjunction with the FRA Regional Director of the region in which the State is located, an annual work plan for the conduct of investigative and surveillance activities by the State agency. The plan shall include a program of inspections designed to monitor the compliance of the railroads, shippers, and manufacturers operating within the State (or portion thereof) with applicable Federal railroad safety laws and regulations. In the event the participating State and the FRA Regional Director cannot agree on an annual work plan, the Associate Administrator for Safety shall review the matter.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2130-0509)

[57 FR 28115, June 24, 1992]
§ 1.96 The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. Is responsible for: ( a ) *Pipelines.* ( 1 ) Administering a national program of safety in natural gas and hazardous liquid pipeline transportation including identifying pipeline safety concerns, developing uniform safety standards, and promulgating and enforcing safety regulations;
( 2 ) Increasing the gas and liquid pipeline industry's focus on safety beyond compliance with minimum standards, with particular attention to developing strong safety cultures in regulated entities;
( 3 ) Enhancing information awareness systems at the State and local levels to reduce pipeline damage from excavation and providing grants to support these systems; and
( 4 ) Encouraging the timely replacement of aging and deteriorating pipelines in distribution systems, especially in areas with high potential negative consequences to public safety and the environment.
( b ) *Hazardous materials.* ( 1 ) Administering a national program of safety, including security, in multi-modal hazardous materials transportation including identifying hazardous materials safety concerns, developing uniform safety standards, and promulgating and enforcing safety and security regulations; and
( 2 ) Conducting outreach and provide available grants assistance to increase awareness and emergency preparedness.
#### Sena Ostergard, appellee, v. Chris Norker et al: Edgar B. Harvey, appellant.

Filed October 5, 1918.

No. 20092.

Vendor and Purchaser: Bona Fide Purchaser: Notice. The general rule is that the open, notorious possession of real property .by a tenant is notice to the world of the landlord’s title.

Appeal from the district court for Madison county: A.nson A. Welch, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Willis E.*Reed, for appellant.

*M. B. Foster*and *W. J.*Mossholder, *contra.*

Cornish, J.

^Plaintiff was induced by fraud and without consideration to make her deed of the land in controversy to the defendant Norker. Soon afterwards the defendant Norker deeded the land to defendant Harvey. At the time of these conveyances the plaintiff was in actual and visible possession of the premises by her tenant, She never surrendered the possession, nor consented that possession be given to either of the defendants. Harvey, at the time of his purchase, made no inquiry of the tenant or plaintiff respecting plaintiff’s rights. This action seeks the cancelation of these conveyances. The trial court found that defendant Harvey purchased without knowledge of the fraud perpetrated upon the plaintiff j but further found that he was not a *bona fide*
      *676purchaser, for the reason that he had constructive notice of plaintiff’s rights and interest in the land, and entered judgment and decree accordingly. Defendant Harvey appeals.

The inquiry is whether the possession of land under such circumstances is notice-of the title of the possessor alone, or whether the possession of the tenant is the possession of the landlord and notice of the former is notice of the latter. In a majority of the' American cases the ’latter rule has been adopted (see note to *Garbutt & Donovan v. Mayo,*128 Ga. 269, 13 L. R. A. n. s. 58, 101, 102), and has been recognized by this court *(Conlee v. McDowell,*15 Neb. 184; *Smith v. Myers,*56 Neb. 503). It is an equitable rule that possession of property is notice to the world. of whatever rights the possessor has in it. The fact- that the possession is by a tenant under circumstances such as in this case should make fío difference. If Harvey had inquired of the tenant, he would have learned that he held as lessee of another. Exercising reasonable prudence, he would not have stopped his inquiry at that point, but would have inquired of the landlord (Mrs. Ostergard) and would have learned, as he afterwards did learn, that she was unwilling to surrender possession and claimed ownership of the land.

Defendant Harvey in his brief raises a question of estoppel, which was neither- pleaded nor litigated in the trial court and cannot be considered here.

We are of opinion that the. judgment and decree of the trial court should be

Affirmed.

Sedgwick, J., not sitting.