alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: jodyforman@mac.com [mailto:jodyforman@mac.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:11 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jody Forman 

370 Fence Road 

Earlysville, VA 22936
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, October 18, 1995 (130), Para 130.13 Commerce, Justice, State Appropriations]
[Page 1547]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.130.13  commerce, justice, state appropriations

  On motion of Mr. ROGERS, by unanimous consent, the bill (H.R. 2076) 
making appropriations for the Department of Commerce, Justice, and 
State, the Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 1996, and for other purposes; together with the amendment 
of the Senate thereto, was taken from the Speaker's table.
  When on motion of Mr. ROGERS, it was,
  Resolved, That the House disagree to the amendment of the Senate and 
agree to the conference asked by the Senate on the disagreeing votes of 
the two Houses thereon.
```
#### § 198.31 Scope.

This subpart implements parts of the pipeline safety laws (49 U.S.C. 60101 *et seq.*), which direct the Secretary to require each State to adopt a one-call damage prevention program as a condition to receiving a full grant-in-aid for its pipeline safety compliance program.

[Amdt. 198-2, 61 FR 18518, Apr. 26, 1996]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Sterling Gas Drilling Fund 1982 first quarter 1999 10Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              12
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    12
<PP&E>                                      12,436,895
<DEPRECIATION>                             (11,756,179)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 680,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          275,625
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     405,103<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   680,728
<SALES>                                         43,090
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,090
<CGS>                                           65,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (22,253)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.39)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Other se includes total partners' equity.
<F2>The limited partner's share of net income was divided by total
number of limited partnership units of 14370.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: connie.call@verizon.net [mailto:connie.call@verizon.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 12:15 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Connie Call 

761 Palms Blvd. 

Venice, CA 90291
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Citicorp (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert B. Willumstad, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Sallie L. Krawcheck, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ROBERT B. WILLUMSTADRobert B. Willumstad
Chief Executive Officer
March 18, 2005/s/SALLIE L. KRAWCHECKSallie L. Krawcheck
Chief Financial Officer
March 18, 2005


This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
-----Original Message----- 

From: jnew@gmavt.net [mailto:jnew@gmavt.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 8:06 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Deborah New 

302 Deer Run Lane 

Waitsfield, VT 05673
#### Florence B. Schwamann, Appellant, *v.*Bertha E. De Land, as Executrix of the Will of Edgar I. Truax, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

*Schwamann*v. *Truax,*128 App. Div. 934, affirmed.

(Argued November 22, 1910;

decided December 6, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 12, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to set aside a partition sale.

*Robert J. Landon*and *John F. Clute*for appellant.

*A. J. Dillingham*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 193

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

#### § 193.2915 Alternative power sources.

An alternative source of power that meets the requirements of § 193.2445 must be provided for security lighting and security monitoring and warning systems required under §§ 193.2911 and 193.2913.
CGR

Consolidated Group Resourees, Ine

April 14, 2010

Office of Health Plan Standards and Compliance Assistance
Employee Benefits Security Administration, Room N-5653
U.S. Department of Labor

Attn: RIN 1210-AB30

200 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20210

To Whom It May Concern:

As a significant provider of employee health care coverage, we ask that methods
to determine parity under the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act
(MHPAEA) interim final rules be reevaluated to ensure that employer-sponsored
coverage does not suffer from additional and excessive cost increases. While
we recognize and appreciate the intent of the law, the formulas utilized to
determine parity under the MHPAEA interim final rules are confusing and
restrictive.

The parity calculations are fashioned in a manner that limits our ability to
encourage primary and preventive care by reducing or waiving cost-sharing.
According to interim final rules, doing so could prohibit reasonable and
appropriate cost-sharing mechanisms on behavioral health services. It was our
interpretation that MHPAEA was intended to prohibit excessive differences in
medical and behavioral benefit design — not to increase the cost-sharing subject
to primary and preventive care.

As a result of MHPAEA, many health plans will be offering unlimited behavioral
health benefits for the first time. Despite the fact that this creates an almost
unquantifiable cost variable, the parity requirements prevent utilization review
and medical necessity tools unless used similarly in medical and surgical
benefits. Utilization review and medical necessity tools are imperative in
behavioral health to ensure appropriate and effective care. It is very critical to
use the aforementioned tools, especially initially, because these services differ
significantly from medical benefits and involve highly subjective diagnoses and
treatments.

By this point, we are confident that the comment period has produced a great
deal of correspondence that is reflective of the above concerns with significantly
more detail. We would encourage you to strongly consider these concerns to
ensure that MHPAEA minimizes or eliminates any adverse or unintended
consequences.

Sincetely,

5435 Corporate Drive. Suite 235 + Troy, MI 48098
(248) 352-6220 © Pax (248) 352-6221 © Toll Free: 800 273-3299
#### Adaline Wright, *Respondent, v.*Isabella S. Conger, *Appellant,*Impleaded, *etc.*

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.
#### Herman Loeb, Appellant, *v.*Albert Salomon et al., Doing Business under the Firm Name of Salomon Brothers *&*Company, Respondents.

*Loeb*v. *Salomon,*132 App. Div. 929, affirmed.

(Argued October 11, 1910;

decided October 25, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 3, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover on an alleged contract of sale.

*Harold G. Aron*and *Daniel Bitrke*for appellant.

*John Frankenheimer*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
#### § 194.115 Response resources.

(a) Each operator shall identify and ensure, by contract or other approved means, the resources necessary to remove, to the maximum extent practicable, a worst case discharge and to mitigate or prevent a substantial threat of a worst case discharge.

(b) An operator shall identify in the response plan the response resources which are available to respond within the time specified, after discovery of a worst case discharge, or to mitigate the substantial threat of such a discharge, as follows:

| | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| High volume area | 6 hrs | 30 hrs | 54 hrs. |
| All other areas | 12 hrs | 36 hrs | 60 hrs. |
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2137 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2137

 To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 to 
require the release of relevant information to protect the public from 
                      sexually violent offenders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 1995

   Mr. Zimmer (for himself, Ms. Dunn of Washington, and Mr. Deal of 
   Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 to 
require the release of relevant information to protect the public from 
                      sexually violent offenders.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``Megan's Law''.

SEC. 2. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.

    Section 170101(d)(3) of the Violent Crime Control and Law 
Enforcement Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 14071(d)(3)) is amended by striking 
``may'' and inserting ``shall''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 565.12 Stay, postponement, discontinuance or suspension of action.

The Commission may, on its own motion or upon petition, postpone, discontinue, or suspend any and all actions taken by it under the provisions of this part. The Commission shall immediately stay the effect of any order issued under this part as requested by the President pursuant to § 565.11.
§ 236.2 Grounds. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each circuit, the functioning of which affects the safety of train operations, shall be kept free of any ground or combination of grounds having a current flow of 75 percent or more of the value necessary to retain a permissive state of a safety appliance.
( b ) *Exception.* Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to the following: ( 1 ) Circuits that include any track rail;
( 2 ) The common return wires of single-wire, single-break, and signal control circuits using a grounded common;
( 3 ) Circuitry internal to microprocessor-based appliances;
( 4 ) Circuitry internal to semiconductor-based memory; or
( 5 ) Alternating current power distribution circuits that are grounded in the interest of safety.
[79 FR 49715, Aug. 22, 2014]
```

[112th Congress Public Law 228]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 1610]]

Public Law 112-228
112th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
   Establishing the date for the counting of the electoral votes for 
     President and Vice President cast by the electors in December 
            2012. <<NOTE: Dec. 28, 2012 -  [H.J. Res. 122]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 3 USC 15 note.>> DATE FOR COUNTING 2012 ELECTORAL 
            VOTES IN CONGRESS.

    The meeting of the Senate and House of Representatives to be held in 
January 2013 pursuant to section 15 of title 3, United States Code, to 
count the electoral votes for President and Vice President cast by the 
electors in December 2012 shall be held on January 4, 2013 (rather than 
on the date specified in the first sentence of that section).

    Approved December 28, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 122:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            Dec. 18, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 20, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
# Continuation of Emergency Regarding Export Control Regulations

                        On August 17, 2001, consistent with the authority provided to me under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 170l*et seq*.), I issued Executive Order 13222. In that order, I declared a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States in light of the expiration of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2401                         *et seq*.). Because the Export Administration Act has not been renewed by the Congress, the national emergency declared on August 17, 2001, must continue in effect beyond August 17, 2007. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13222.                     

                        This notice shall be published in the                         **Federal Register**                         and transmitted to the Congress.                     

[FR Doc. 07-4055

Billing code 3195-01-P
From: Steckel, Andrew To: Reyes Romero ; monicasoucier@co.imperial.ca.us ; belenleon@co.imperial.ca.us ; Sutkus, Carol@ARB Cc: LEVIN, NANCY ; Zimpfer, Amy ; Drake, Kerry Subject: EPA comments on Imperial County APCD draft Rule 217 Date: Thursday, May 21, 2015 9:18:44 AM Attachments: EPA comments IC 217 May21 2015.docx



# Dear Reyes, Monica and Belen; Thank you for the opportunity to review draft Rule 217 ( Revision 2 – Draft March 5, 2015 ). Attached are our general comments. We look forward to working together as you continue developing the rule. If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at 415-947-4115 or Nancy Levin at 415-972-3848.

Andy Steckel (415) 947-4115
Exhibit 11.
 Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings

 In thousands, except per share amounts

 For the three months ended March 31        1998       1997

 Diluted earnings per common share:
  Average common shares outstanding ....    11,597    11,400
  Common stock equivalents .............       313       245
                                           -------   -------
    Average shares and share equivalents    11,910    11,645

Net income .............................   $ 6,574   $ 5,548

Diluted net income per share ...........   $  0.55   $  0.48


Basic earnings per common share:
  Average common shares outstanding ....    11,597    11,400

Net income .............................   $ 6,574   $ 5,548

Basic net income per share .............   $  0.57   $  0.49
Exhibit 21

Energy East Corporation



|Subsidiaries                              | State of Incorporation
|----------------------------------------- | ----------------------
|Central Maine Power Company               | Maine                 
|Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation       | Connecticut           
|Energetix, Inc.                           | New York              
|Energy East Enterprises, Inc.             | Maine                 
|Energy East Management Corporation        | Delaware              
|Maine Electric Power Co., Inc.            | Maine                 
|Maine Natural Gas Corporation             | Maine                 
|NORVARCO                                  | Maine                 
|New York State Electric & Gas Corporation | New York              
|Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation    | New York              
|The Berkshire Gas Company                 | Massachusetts         
|The Energy Network, Inc.                  | Delaware              
|The Southern Connecticut Gas Company      | Connecticut
-----Original Message----- 

From: bbrenda88@aol.com [mailto:bbrenda88@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:55 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Brenda DeBernardi 

2300 Monte Verde Drive 

Pinole, CA 94564
From: Karen Lake Ph. D. [mailto:lpsychological@sc.rr.com] 

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 8:53 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: eeg neurofeedback parity

Lake Psychological Services 

Karen Lake, Ph.D. 

One Windsor Cove (803)699-8887 

Suite 304 (803)699-8824 

Columbia, South Carolina 29223 

May 22, 2009 

 

RE: Comments regarding Regulatory Guidance USCG-2007-27022 

page 19157, II B specific areas 1 and 4

I am a clinical psychologist who provides EEG biofeedback treatment to individuals with 

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Mood Disorders. EEG biofeedback is an 

empirically validated and widely recognized effective non-medication treatment for 

ADHD, as well as other conditions. There are over 50 studies evaluating the 

effectiveness of EEG biofeedback in the treatment of ADHD, Substance Use disorders 

and Autism. A recent review of this literature concluded “EEG biofeedback meets the 

American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry criteria for” Clinical Guidelines 

“for treatment of ADHD.” This means that EEG biofeedback meets the same criteria as 

medication for treating ADHD, and that EEG biofeedback “should always be considered 

as an intervention for this disorder by the clinician”. 

This service has been denied by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, United Behavioral Health, 

Blue Cross, Cigna, and Amerigroup.

This is limitation of an effective and validated treatment for a mental health problem. 

The reasons given by the insurance companies for this denial fell into two categories: 1) 

our company does not cover biofeedback for Mental Health problems or 2) there is not 

yet sufficient evidence for the efficacy of EEG biofeedback. As such, they are using 

evidence-based criteria that are far more restrictive for mental health services than the 

criteria which are used for medical/surgical services. There are many routine medical and 

surgical procedures which have far fewer controlled studies about their efficacy than does 

EEG biofeedback. These medical and surgical procedures are generally not limited 

because of concerns about how many controlled studies have been performed about them. 

 We believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity statue, 

should require that employers and plans pay for the same range and scope of services for 

Behavioral Treatments as they do for Med Surg benefits and that a plan cannot be more 

restrictive in their managed care criteria and reviews for MH and SA disorders when 
compared to Med Surg. Today plans are being more restrictive in how they review 

evidenced based Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatments when compared to Med 

Surg treatments. This violates both the intent and letter of the parity statue and we hope 

that the regulations will clarify that this can't continue. 

Thank you for your consideration of this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Karen Lake, PhD 

Licensed Clinical Psychologist