Opinion issued January 30 , 2024

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 23
- 00822
- CV

—————————— SHARON YASIN , Appellant

V. HARRIS COUNTY CIVIL COURTS AT LARGE COURT 1, Appell e e

On Appeal from C ounty Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1 204306

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Sharon Yasin , acting pro se, attempts to appeal from the trial court’s Septem

ber 15 , 202 3 order of dismissal. Appellant has been de clared a vexatious litigant and is the subject of a pre - filing order , signed on August 23, 2023,
i n Sharon Yasin v. Harris County Civil Courts at Large Court 1, et al. , Cause No.2

1204306, in the County Court at Law No. 1, of Harris County, Texas. See Office of Court Administration List of Vexatious Litigants Subject to a Prefiling Order under Chapter 11 of the Civil Practice and Rem edies Code, available at www.txcourts.gov/judicial

- data/vexatious

- litigants.aspx (last viewed on Dec. 22, 2023); see also T EX
. C IV
. P RAC . & R EM
. C ODE § 11.104(b) (requiring Office of Court Administration to maintain and post list of vexatious litigants on agency’s website); Johnson v. Marsh , No. 02

- 13

- 00406

- CV, 2014 WL 982377, at *1 n.2 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Mar. 13, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.) (taking judicial notice of list of vexatious litigants maintained by Office of Court Administration). The pre

- filin g order p rohibit s Appellant from filing, pro se, new litigation without seeking the permission of an appropriate local administrative judge. S ee T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. &
R EM
. C ODE §§ 11.101, 11.102. The Clerk of this Court may not file an appeal presented by a vexatious litigant subject to a pre - filing order unless the litigant first obtains an order from the appropriate local administrative judge permitting the filing or the appeal is from

a pre - filing order designating the person a vexatious litigant

. See T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R EM
. C ODE § 11 .103(a). Appellant is not appealing from a pre - filing order designating h er a vexatious litigant. See id. § 11.103(d). A ppellant may thus not proceed with h er appeal unless the appropriate local administrative judge permitted
h er filing. See id. § 11.103(a).3

On January 4 , 202 4 , the Clerk of this Court notified A ppellant that this appeal was subject to dismissal unless s he responded within ten days with proof t hat, before filing h er appeal, s he obtained an order from the appropriate local administrative judge permitting h er appeal. In response to the notice, A ppellant did not produce an order permitting the filing of h er appeal or otherwise adequately respond. Additionally, the clerk’s record is devoid of any order permitting the filing of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id. § 11.1035(b); T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a); Johnson v. Parker , N o. 03

- 19

- 00067

- CV, 2019 WL 3922908, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Aug. 20, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing vexatious litigant’s appeal in absence of order from local administrative judge permitting filing of appeal) ; Johnson v. Hughey , No. 06

- 12

- 00079

- CV, 2012 WL 4761546, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Texarkana Oct. 5, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.) (same). All pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justice s Landau and Rivas

- Molloy

.