alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
10/26/201 0 13:3 7 816329410 6 SA D PAG E 02/0 3 

### Tf^^RTMENTO F 

# ® - .-^.NSPOBWIO N '•-" I OPERATION S Smal l Airplan e Directorat e 90 1 Locus t Kansa s City , M O 6410 6 U.S . Deparrrnan t , • • ; -- T ou , O h - H I o t Transportatio n .'•!•.'••• ' • ^ ^ ^ ' ' - ' Federa l Aviatio n Adrnlnfstratio n OC T 2 6 201 D Mr . Tod dPogu e Aviatio n Fabricator s Centra l Airmotiv e 80 5 Nort h Fourt h Stree t Clinton , MO 6473 5 DearMr . Poguc : W e apologiz e fo

r th e delay i n processin g your petitio n fo

r exemption . Unfortunately , w e overlooke dit

i n the Docke t

Managemen

t System . Th

e petitio n reques t

ha s been assigne dt

o a n engineer , andyo

u shoul db e receivin g arespons e withi n amonth . Thi s lette r i s to infora

i yo u tha t w e hav e receive dandbegun processin g your petitio n fo

r exemption . I

t acknowledge s receip t

o f tli e petitio n an

ddescribe s ho w w e wil l proces s it . W e Hav e th e Petitio n We'v e receivedyou

r Apri l 8 , 2008 , petitio n o n behal f of Aviatio n Fabricator s (AVFAB ) fo r a n exemption &o

m§ 23.81 5 o

f Titl e 14 , Code o f

Federa l Regulation s (1 4 CFR) . Thi s exemption , if

granted , woul dallo w AVFA B t o instal l Beechcraf

t Af t Jumpsea t kit s i n a Beech B30

C airplan e andincreas e th e availabl e cabi n seating t o 1 0 or

1 T passenger s withou

t replacin g th e existin g cabi n seat s wit h anarrowe

r seat . We'v e addedyou

r petitio n to th e publi c docke t (No . FAA-2008-0433 ) andw e ar e processin g it . W

e wil l conteic

t yo u if we nee dadditiona

l information . Ho w We'l l Proces s th e Petitio n A petitio n fo

r a n exemption , accordin g t

o 1 4 CF R11.63(d) , mus t

b e sen t t o th e FA A a t leas t 12 0 day s befor

e th e propose deffective dat e o f th e exemption . I

n addition , w e publis h a summar y o f th e petitio n i n th e Federa

l Registe r fo r publi c commen

t unless , accordin g t

o 1 4 CF R11.87 , w e determin e tha

t goo dcaus e exist s fo

r no t publishin g it .10/26/201 0 13:3 7 816329410 6 SA D PAG E 03/0 3

W e wil l advis e yo

u o f th e agency' s fma

l decisio n o

n you r petitio n a s soo n as possible . If yo u hav e an y question s i n th e meantime , yo u ma y contac t Mr , Le s Taylo r

a t (816)329-4134 . Sincerely , Joh n Colom y Acting Manager , Small Airplan e Directorat e Aircraf t Certificatio n Servic e
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45769-45774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3982]



[[Page 45769]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 07-39]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 07-39 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: August 8, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 45770]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AU07.008


[[Page 45771]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AU07.009


[[Page 45772]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AU07.010


[[Page 45773]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AU07.011

[FR Doc. 07-3982 Filed 8-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.413 Underwater inspection and reburial of pipelines in the Gulf of Mexico and its inlets. ( a ) Except for gathering lines of 41 ⁄ 2 inches (114mm) nominal outside diameter or smaller, each operator shall prepare and follow a procedure to identify its pipelines in the Gulf of Mexico and its inlets in waters less than 15 feet (4.6 meters) deep as measured from mean low water that are at risk of being an exposed underwater pipeline or a hazard to navigation. The procedures must be in effect August 10, 2005.
( b ) Each operator shall conduct appropriate periodic underwater inspections of its pipelines in the Gulf of Mexico and its inlets in waters less than 15 feet (4.6 meters) deep as measured from mean low water based on the identified risk.
( c ) If an operator discovers that its pipeline is an exposed underwater pipeline or poses a hazard to navigation, the operator shall— ( 1 ) Promptly, but not later than 24 hours after discovery, notify the National Response Center, telephone: 1-800-424-8802, of the location and, if available, the geographic coordinates of that pipeline.
( 2 ) Promptly, but not later than 7 days after discovery, mark the location of the pipeline in accordance with 33 CFR Part 64 at the ends of the pipeline segment and at intervals of not over 500 yards (457 meters) long, except that a pipeline segment less than 200 yards (183 meters) long need only be marked at the center; and
( 3 ) Within 6 months after discovery, or not later than November 1 of the following year if the 6 month period is later than November 1 of the year of discovery, bury the pipeline so that the top of the pipe is 36 inches (914 millimeters) below the underwater natural bottom (as determined by recognized and generally accepted practices) for normal excavation or 18 inches (457 millimeters) for rock excavation. ( i ) An operator may employ engineered alternatives to burial that meet or exceed the level of protection provided by burial.
( ii ) If an operator cannot obtain required state or Federal permits in time to comply with this section, it must notify OPS; specify whether the required permit is State or Federal; and, justify the delay.
[Amdt. 195-82, 69 FR 48407, Aug. 10, 2004]
Non-Employee Director Grant Notice



 Exhibit 10.9 
 BJ’S RESTAURANTS, INC. 
 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 NOTICE OF GRANT OF STOCK OPTION 
 (Non-Employee Director Stock Option) 
  

	Name:	

 Grant of Option

 You have been granted an option to buy shares of common stock of BJ’s Restaurants, Inc. (the “Company”) as follows: 
  

			
	Grant Date:	  	
	Option Price per Share:	  	
	Total Number of Shares:	  	
	Expiration Date:	  	(unless earlier terminated pursuant to the terms of your Grant Summary or Stock Option Agreement)

 Exercise Schedule 
 The option shall become exercisable with respect to the number of shares of the aforementioned Total Number of Shares as set forth on the “Exercise Schedule” in
the Grant Summary attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 
 Agreement 
 By your signature and the Company’s signature below, you and the Company agree that this option is granted under and governed by the terms of the BJ’s
Restaurants, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, and the form of Stock Option Agreement which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PLEASE READ SUCH AGREEMENT. 
  

									
	“COMPANY”	 		 	
		 		 	“OPTIONEE”
	BJ’S RESTAURANTS, INC.	 		 	
		 		 	 Name:

		 		 	
	By:	 	  	 		 	 Address:

	 Gerald W. Deitchle
 Chief Executive Officer and President
	 		 	
		 		 		 	Signature:	 	  








 BJ’S RESTAURANTS, INC. 
 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 GRANT SUMMARY 
 (Non-Employee Director Stock Option) 
  

					
			
	Name:	  		  	
		
	Grant Type:	  	Non-Employee Director Stock Option
			
	Grant Date:	  		  	Exp. Date:
			
	Total Shares:	  		  	Option Price:

 EXERCISE SCHEDULE 
  

			
	 Number of Shares
	 	 Exercise Date

		 	
		 	
		 	
		 	
		 	
		 	

  

 -2-
-----Original Message----- 

From: liz.ched@gmail.com [mailto:liz.ched@gmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 2:06 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

elisabeth Wertheim 

4150 Hana Highway 

Haiku, HI 96708
#### § 225.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to provide the Federal Railroad Administration with accurate information concerning the hazards and risks that exist on the Nation's railroads. FRA needs this information to effectively carry out its regulatory responsibilities under 49 U.S.C. chapters 201-213. FRA also uses this information for determining comparative trends of railroad safety and to develop hazard elimination and risk reduction programs that focus on preventing railroad injuries and accidents. Any State may require railroads to submit to it copies of accident/incident and injury/illness reports filed with FRA under this part, for accidents/incidents and injuries/illnesses which occur in that State.

[75 FR 68903, Nov. 9, 2010]
#### § 217.2 Preemptive effect.

Normal State negligence standards apply where there is no Federal action covering the subject matter. Under 49 U.S.C. 20106 (section 20106), issuance of the regulations in this part preempts any State law, regulation, or order covering the same subject matter, except an additional or more stringent law, regulation, or order that is necessary to eliminate or reduce an essentially local railroad safety or railroad security hazard; that is not incompatible with a law, regulation, or order of the United States Government; and that does not unreasonably burden interstate commerce. Section 20106 permits State tort actions arising from events or activities occurring on or after January 18, 2002, for the following: violation of the Federal standard of care established by regulation or order issued by the Secretary of Transportation (with respect to railroad safety, such as these regulations) or the Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to railroad security); a party's violation of, or failure to comply with, its own plan, rule, or standard that it created pursuant to a regulation or order issued by either of the two Secretaries; and a party's violation of a State standard that is necessary to eliminate or reduce an essentially local safety or security hazard, is not incompatible with a law, regulation, or order of the United States Government, and does not unreasonably burden interstate commerce. Nothing in section 20106 creates a Federal cause of action on behalf of an injured party or confers Federal question jurisdiction for such State law causes of action.

[73 FR 8495, Feb. 13, 2008]
#### § 238.501 Scope.

This subpart contains inspection, testing, and maintenance requirements for railroad passenger equipment that operates at speeds exceeding 125 mph but not exceeding 160 mph.

[83 FR 59219, Nov. 21, 2018]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7934** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. RICHARD A. SANTIAGO, a/k/a Rick , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:06

- cr - 00515

- HEH

- 1 )

Submitted : May 18 , 2016 Decided: May 20, 2016

Before SHEDD , DIAZ , and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Richard A. Santiago , Appellant Pro Se. Angela Mastandrea

Miller , Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Richard A. Santiago appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012)
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Santiago , No. 3:06

- cr - 00515

- HEH

- 1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conclusions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

ARMANDO GARCIA , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 2022

- 3145

[ April 11, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Howard K. Coates, Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2021

- CF

002695

- AXXX

- MB

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig, S enior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH , C.J., C IKLIN and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
2:15-cr-20484-PDB-EAS Doc # 30 Filed 04/08/16 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 200
2:15-cr-20484-PDB-EAS Doc # 30 Filed 04/08/16 Pg 2 of 12 Pg ID 201
2:15-cr-20484-PDB-EAS Doc # 30 Filed 04/08/16 Pg 3 of 12 Pg ID 202
2:15-cr-20484-PDB-EAS Doc # 30 Filed 04/08/16 Pg 4 of 12 Pg ID 203
2:15-cr-20484-PDB-EAS Doc # 30 Filed 04/08/16 Pg 5 of 12 Pg ID 204
2:15-cr-20484-PDB-EAS Doc # 30 Filed 04/08/16 Pg 6 of 12 Pg ID 205
2:15-cr-20484-PDB-EAS Doc # 30 Filed 04/08/16 Pg 7 of 12 Pg ID 206
2:15-cr-20484-PDB-EAS Doc # 30 Filed 04/08/16 Pg 8 of 12 Pg ID 207
2:15-cr-20484-PDB-EAS Doc # 30 Filed 04/08/16 Pg 9 of 12 Pg ID 208
2:15-cr-20484-PDB-EAS Doc # 30 Filed 04/08/16 Pg 10 of 12 Pg ID 209
2:15-cr-20484-PDB-EAS Doc # 30 Filed 04/08/16 Pg 11 of 12 Pg ID 210
2:15-cr-20484-PDB-EAS Doc # 30 Filed 04/08/16 Pg 12 of 12 Pg ID 211
#### § 236.785 Position, false restrictive.

A position of a semaphore arm that is more restrictive than it should be.
November 18, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

VINCENT ZAHORIK , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00564

- CV V.

METROPLITAN LIFE INS URANCE COMPANY, MOHSIN NOON , AMY CATCHING, AND SUZANN E WYZINSKI

- SMITH , Appellee s

________________________________ Today the Court heard appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on June 24, 2014. Having considered the

mo tion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Vincent Zahorik.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
§ 238.433 Draft system. ( a ) Leading and trailing automatic couplers of trains shall be compatible with standard AAR couplers with no special adapters used.
( b ) All passenger equipment continues to be subject to the requirements concerning couplers and uncoupling devices contained in Federal Statute at 49 U.S.C. chapter 203 and in FRA regulations at part 231 and § 232.2 of this chapter.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 OMEGA FINANCIAL CORPORATION CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 This certification is intended to accompany Omega Financial Corporations (the Company)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and is given solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. I, David B. Lee, hereby certify in my capacity as the Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Date: May 6, 2005
    
    /s/ David B. LeeDavid B. LeeChief Executive Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. Page 24
-----Original Message----- 

From: ralph@homecoop.net [mailto:ralph@homecoop.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 4:26 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ralph Grimes 

72 Maple St 

Stockton Springs, ME 04981
From: meshele_morris2010@hotmail.com 

[mailto:meshele_morris2010@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 6:34 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Mitzi Morris 

905 West Chambers 

Cleburne, TX 76033
#### The Prospect Park and Coney Island Railroad Company, Appellant, *v.*S. Stryker Williamson and others, *Commis*sioners, *Respondents.*

— Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. Opinion by

Brown, J.
#### Patrick Butler, *Appellant, v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, *Respondent.*

— Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Barker, J.
§ 236.501 Forestalling device and speed control. ( a ) An automatic train stop system may include a device by means of which the automatic application of the brakes can be forestalled.
( b ) Automatic train control system shall include one or more of the following features: ( 1 ) Low-speed restriction, requiring the train to proceed under slow speed after it has either been stopped by an automatic application of the brakes, or under control of the engineman, its speed has been reduced to slow speed, until the apparatus is automatically restored to normal because the condition which caused the restriction no longer affects the movement of the train.
( 2 ) Medium-speed restriction, requiring the train to proceed under medium speed after passing a signal displaying an approach aspect or when approaching a signal requiring a stop, or a stop indication point, in order to prevent an automatic application of the brakes. Note:
Relief from the requirements of paragraphs (b) (1) and (2) of this section will be granted, insofar as speed limits fixed by definitions of Slow and Medium speeds are concerned, upon an adequate showing by an individual carrier where automatic train control systems now in service enforce speed restrictions higher than those required by definitions in §§ 236.700 to 236.838 inclusive.
( 3 ) Maximum-speed restriction, effecting an automatic brake application whenever the predetermined maximum speed limit is exceeded.
#### § 233.5 Accidents resulting from signal failure.

Each carrier shall report within 24 hours to the Federal Railroad Administration by toll free telephone, number 800-424-0201, whenever it learns of the occurrence of an accident/incident arising from the failure of an appliance, device, method or system to function or indicate as required by part 236 of this title that results in a more favorable aspect than intended or other condition hazardous to the movement of a train.

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 49 FR 3379, Jan. 26, 1984, part 233 was revised. Section 233.5 contains information collection and recordkeeping requirements and will not become effective until approval has been given by the Office of Management and Budget.
-----Original Message----- 

From: virjune@yahoo.com [mailto:virjune@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:25 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Virginia Peterson 

1424 Darrow Ave 

EVANSTON, IL 60201
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

          - (Transmittal No. 07-40) 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 07-40 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology. 

Dated: August 8, 2007. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. 

      ( print page 45775)          ( print page 45776)          ( print page 45777)          ( print page 45778)          ( print page 45779)          ( print page 45780)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M 

[FR Doc. 07-3983 Filed 8-14-07; 8:45 am] 

                BILLING CODE 5001-06-C                       ( print page 45781)
## LS Particle Size Analyzer

2 Apr 2012

File name:

File ID:

Sample ID:

Operator:

Optical model:

Residual:

LS 13 320

Start time:

Average Vacuum:

Obscuration:

Software:

## LS Particle Size Analyzer

2 Apr 2012