alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The Brain Therapy Center 

Director: Harold Burke, PhD, MSCP 

2277 Townsgate Rd., Suite 220 

Westlake Village, CA 91361

TEL (805) 449-8777, FAX (805) 449-1936 

www.brain-injury-therapy.com 

Comments regarding Regulatory Guidance USCG-2007-27022 

page 19157, II B specific areas 1 and 4

I am a clinical neuropsychologist who provides EEG biofeedback treatment to 

individuals with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and mood disorders. EEG 

biofeedback is an empirically validated and widely recognized, effective non-medication 

treatment for ADHD, as well as other conditions. There are over 50 published studies 

evaluating the effectiveness of EEG biofeedback for the treatment of ADHD, 

substance use disorders, and autism spectrum disorders. Six of the studies demonstrating 

the efficacy of EEG biofeedback for ADHD were controlled, with three being 

randomized, controlled trials. A recent review of this literature concluded “EEG 

biofeedback meets the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry criteria 

for Clinical Guidelines for treatment of ADHD.” This means that EEG biofeedback 

meets the same criteria as medication for treating ADHD and that EEG biofeedback 

“should always be considered as an intervention for this disorder by the clinician.” 

Nevertheless, this service has been denied by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, United 

Behavioral Health, Blue Cross, Cigna, and Amerigroup. This is limitation of an effective 

and validated treatment for a mental health problem. The reasons given by the insurance 

companies for this denial fell into two categories: 1) “Our company does not cover 

biofeedback for mental health problems” or 2) “There is not yet sufficient evidence for 

the efficacy of EEG biofeedback.” As such, they are using evidence-based criteria that 

are far more restrictive for mental health services than the criteria which are used for 

medical/surgical services. There are many routine medical and surgical procedures that 

have far fewer controlled studies about their efficacy than does EEG biofeedback. These 

medical and surgical procedures are generally not limited because of concerns about how 

many controlled studies have been performed about them. 

I believe that the parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity statue, should 

require that employers and plans pay for the same range and scope of services for 

behavioral treatments as they do for medical/surgical benefits and that a plan cannot be 

more restrictive in their managed care criteria and reviews for mental health and 

substance abuse disorders when compared to medical/surgical. Today plans are being 

more restrictive in how they review evidenced based mental health and substance abuse 

treatments when compared to medical/surgical treatments. This violates both the intent 

and letter of the parity statute, and I hope that the regulations will clarify that this can't 

continue. 

Harold Burke, PhD, MSCP, BCIA-EEG 

Clinical Neuropsychologist, Medical Psychologist 

Licensed Psychologist 

Lic.# PSY12879
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           8,923
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           6,636
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     95,940
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         115,359
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           116,509
<LOANS>                                        941,119
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,931
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,186,661
<DEPOSITS>                                     887,869
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             16,849
<LONG-TERM>                                    216,232
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           48,351
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,360
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,186,661
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 70,815
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               17,106
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                87,921
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              36,913
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,289
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           33,632
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,400
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 147
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 29,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,365
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,365
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,140
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.05
<LOANS-NON>                                      8,172
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 14,462
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,199
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,187
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,519
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,931
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,931
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
§ 218.7 Waivers. ( a ) A railroad may petition the Federal Railroad Administration for a waiver of compliance with any requirement prescribed in this part.
( b ) Each petition for a waiver under this section must be filed in the manner and contain the information required by part 211 of this chapter.
( c ) If the Administrator finds that waiver of compliance is in the public interest and is consistent with railroad safety, he may grant the waiver subject to any conditions he deems necessary. Notice of each waiver granted, including a statement of the reasons, therefore, is published in the Federal Register.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 21, 1995 (119), Para 119.9 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 743]
[Page 1446]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.119.9  providing for the consideration of h.r. 743

  Mr. SOLOMON, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. 
No. 104-256) the resolution (H. Res. 226) providing for the 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 743) to amend the National Labor 
Relations Act to allow labor management cooperative efforts that improve 
economic competitiveness in the United States to continue to thrive, and 
for other purposes.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: johnwsteele@yahoo.com [mailto:johnwsteele@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:02 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

John Steele 

1055 Miami Way 

Boulder, CO 80305
-----Original Message----- 

From: cherrypicker@netzero.net [mailto:cherrypicker@netzero.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:39 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

George Fisher 

PO Box 701 

Mishawaka, IN 46546
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Reportof PHI Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Henry D. Fahman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifiesto the best of his knowledge, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

Date: November 21, 2011	

PHI GROUP, INC.

By: /s/ Henry D. Fahman        

Henry D. Fahman

Chief Executive Officer
#### Ella L. Winton, *Respondent, v.*Walter W. Winton, *Appellant*.

Order affirmect, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
#### § 236.827 System, block signal.

A method of governing the movement of trains into or within one or more blocks by block signals or cab signals.
Exhibit 24



                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned
directors of Chrysler Financial Corporation hereby severally constitutes and
appoints D. M. Cantwell, T. L. Hackman, Byron C. Babbish and T. F. Gilman, or
any one or more of them, to be his agents, proxies and attorneys-in-fact, to
sign and execute in his name, place and stead and on his behalf, and to file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Form 10-K Annual Report of Chrysler
Financial Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, and any and
all amendments to such Annual Report that may be necessary or desirable,
hereby approving, ratifying and confirming all that the aforesaid agents,
proxies and attorneys-in-fact do, or that any one of them does, on his behalf
pursuant to this Power.






<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands as
of this 31st day of December, 1996.




    \s\ T. P. Capo                                   \s\ D. L. Davis
-------------------                                  ---------------
       T. P. Capo                                       D. L. Davis



    \s\ R. J. Eaton                                  \s\ R. A. Lutz
-------------------                                  --------------
        R. J. Eaton                                      R. A. Lutz



    \s\ W. J. O'Brien III                            \s\ T. W. Sidlik
-------------------------                            ----------------
        W. J. O'Brien III                                T. W. Sidlik



                               \s\ G. C. Valade
                               ----------------
                                 G. C. Valade
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 10, 1995 (125), Para 125.8 Order of Business--Consideration of Amendment--H.R. 436]
[Page 1496]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.125.8  order of business--consideration of amendment--h.r. 436

  On motion of Mr. BURR, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That, notwithstanding the provisions of clause 4 of rule 
XIII, it may be in order that during the consideration of the bill (H.R. 
436) to require the heads of any Federal agency to differentiate between 
fats, oils, and greases of animal, marine, or vegetable origin, and 
other oils and greases in issuing certain regulations, and for other 
purposes, on the Corrections Calendar, the gentleman from North 
Carolina, Mr. Burr, may offer an amendment in the nature of a substitute 
in lieu of the amendment recommended by the Committee on Commerce now 
printed in the bill.
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDesign of a lunar transportation system, volume 2The Spring 1990 Introduction to Design class was asked to conceptually design second generation lunar vehicles and equipment as a semester design project. A brief summary of four of the final projects, is presented. The designs were to facilitate the transportation of personnel and materials. The eight topics to choose from included flying vehicles, ground based vehicles, robotic arms, and life support systems. A lunar flying vehicle that uses clean propellants for propulsion is examined. A design that will not contribute to the considerable amount of caustic pollution already present in the sparse lunar atmosphere is addressed by way of ballistic flight techniques. A second generation redesign of the current Extra Vehicular Activity (EVA) suit to increase operating time, safety, and efficiency is also addressed. A separate life support system is also designed to be permanently attached to the lunar rover. The two systems would interact through the use of an umbilical cord connection. A ground based vehicle which will travel for greater distances than a 37.5 kilometer radius from a base on the lunar surface was designed. The vehicle is pressurized due to the fact that existing lunar rovers are limited by the EVA suits currently in use. A robotic arm for use at lunar bases or on roving vehicles on the lunar surface was designed. The arm was originally designed as a specimen gathering device, but it can be used for a wide range of tasks through the use of various attachments.Document ID19900017017Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1990Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186833-VOL-2NASA-CR-186833-VOL-2Accession Number90N26333Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NGT-21-002-800Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017017.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, September 25, 1995 (120), Para 120.2 Approval of the Journal]
[Page 1450]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.120.2  approval of the journal

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. TATE, announced he had examined and 
approved the Journal of the proceedings of Thursday, September 21, 1995.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal was approved.
```
§ 214.357 Training and qualification for operators of roadway maintenance machines equipped with a crane. ( a ) In addition to the general training and qualification requirements for operators of roadway maintenance machines set forth in §§ 214.341 and 214.355 of this subpart, each employer shall adopt and comply with a training and qualification program for operators of roadway maintenance machines equipped with a crane to ensure the safe operation of such machines.
( b ) Each employer's training and qualification program for operators of roadway maintenance machines equipped with a crane shall require initial and periodic qualification of each operator of a roadway maintenance machine equipped with a crane and shall include: ( 1 ) Procedures for determining that the operator has the skills to safely operate each machine the person is authorized to operate; and
( 2 ) Procedures for determining that the operator has the knowledge to safely operate each machine the person is authorized to operate. Such procedures shall determine that either: ( i ) The operator has knowledge of the safety instructions (*i.e.,* the manufacturer's instruction manual) applicable to that machine; or
( ii ) The operator has knowledge of the safety instructions developed to replace the manufacturer's safety instructions when the machine has been adapted for a specific railroad use. Such instructions shall address all aspects of the safe operation of the crane and shall be as comprehensive as the manufacturer's safety instructions they replace.
( c ) Each employer shall maintain records that form the basis of the training and qualification determinations of each operator of roadway maintenance machines equipped with a crane that it employs.
( d ) Availability of records: Each employer required to maintain records under this part shall make all records available for inspection and copying/photocopying to representatives of FRA, upon request during normal business hours.
( e ) Training conducted by an employer in accordance with operator qualification and certification required by the Department of Labor (29 CFR 1926.1427) may be used to satisfy the training and qualification requirements of this section.
[79 FR 66501, Nov. 7, 2014]
```

[112th Congress Public Law 224]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 1604]]

Public Law 112-224
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  26 East Genesee Street in Baldwinsville, New York, as the ``Corporal 
 Kyle Schneider Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Dec. 28, 2012 -  [H.R. 
                                5837]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CORPORAL KYLE SCHNEIDER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 26 East Genesee Street in Baldwinsville, New York, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Corporal Kyle Schneider Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Kyle Schneider Post Office Building''.

    Approved December 28, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5837:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            July 23, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 19, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 29, 1995 (123), Para 123.25 Adjournment of the Two Houses]
[Page 1491]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.123.25  adjournment of the two houses

  Mr. SHAYS, submitted the following privileged concurrent resolution 
(H. Con. Res. 104):

       Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
     concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legislative 
     day of Friday, September 29, 1995, it stand adjourned until 
     10 a.m. on Friday, October 6, 1995, or until noon on the 
     second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant 
     to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
     first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any 
     day beginning with Friday, September 29, 1995, through 
     Friday, October 6, 1995, pursuant to a motion made by the 
     Majority Leader or his designee in accordance with this 
     resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on 
     Tuesday, October 10, 1995, or until such time on that day as 
     may be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in 
     the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second 
     day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to 
     section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
     first.
       Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of 
     the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the 
     Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the 
     Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and the Senate, 
     respectively, to reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the 
     public interest shall warrant it.

  When said concurrent resolution was considered and agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said concurrent resolution was 
agreed to was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
concurrent resolution.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: tlkratzer@mac.com [mailto:tlkratzer@mac.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 4:08 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Theresa Kratzer 

P.O. Box 84 

Nederland, CO 80466