alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-40084

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Khristal Ford, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:19-CR-70-1

Before King, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Khristal Ford

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ford has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 3, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-40084 Document: 00515845851 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/03/2021
No. 20-40084

2

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as 

Ford’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th 

Cir. R. 42.2.

Ford’s motion to proceed pro se is DENIED as untimely. United 

States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

Case: 20-40084 Document: 00515845851 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/03/2021
-----Original Message----- 

From: michael.gorder@my.tccd.edu [mailto:michael.gorder@my.tccd.edu] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:51 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Michael Gorder 

4930 Cloyce Ct. Apt. #c 

North Richland Hills, TX 76180
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00835-CR

Jesus GONZALEZ-GALLEGOS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR6182

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 3, 2021

AFFIRMED

Jesus Gonzalez-Gallegos appeals his underlying criminal conviction and asserts he is 

entitled to either an acquittal or a new trial because the search of his vehicle was illegal. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

On the evening of March 4, 2019, San Antonio Police Sergeant David Acosta ran the 

license plate of a vehicle traveling in front of him. Upon learning the license plate showed an 

expired registration and outstanding traffic warrants, Acosta stopped the vehicle, which was being 

driven by Gonzalez-Gallegos. After Acosta confirmed Gonzalez-Gallegos was the individual 
04-19-00835-CR

- 2 -

named in the warrants, he placed Gonzalez-Gallegos in handcuffs and seated him in the rear seat 

of the patrol car. Because Acosta smelled marijuana coming from inside the vehicle, Acosta 

conducted a search of the vehicle and found a vape pen that field-tested positive for THC. 

Gonzalez-Gallegos was later charged with and convicted by a jury of possession of a controlled 

substance.

ANALYSIS

On appeal, Gonzalez-Gallegos contends the search of his vehicle was illegal. However, 

Gonzalez-Gallegos did not raise this issue at trial. Instead, Gonzalez-Gallegos argued there was 

no reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle and the traffic stop was, therefore, illegal. In response, 

the State argues Gonzalez-Gallegos waived his argument on appeal because his objection at trial 

does not comport with the argument he raises here. We agree with the State.

To preserve a complaint for appellate review, a party must have presented to the trial court 

a timely request, objection, or motion that states the specific grounds for the desired ruling if they 

are not apparent from the context of the request, objection, or motion. TEX. R. APP. P.

33.1(a)(1)(A); Gibson v. State, 541 S.W.3d 164, 166 (Tex. Crim. App. 2017); Gauna v. State, 534 

S.W.3d 7, 10 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2017, no pet.). In other words, the complaining party must 

advise the trial court of what he wants and why, and he must do so in a manner that allows the trial 

court to understand the complaint. Gauna, 534 S.W.3d at 10. If the complaint made on appeal 

does not comport with the complaint made in the trial court, the complaint is not preserved for 

consideration on appeal. Gibson, 541 S.W.3d at 166; Heidelberg v. State, 144 S.W.3d 535, 537 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2004).

Gonzales-Gallegos did not contest the legality of the search of his vehicle at trial.

Therefore, we conclude Gonzalez-Gallegos did not preserve this complaint on appeal.
04-19-00835-CR

- 3 -

CONCLUSION

We overrule Gonzalez-Gallegos’s sole issue on appeal and affirm the trial court’s 

judgment.

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Do not publish
§ 176.168 Transport of Class 1 (explosive) materials in vehicle spaces. ( a ) All transport vehicles and cargo must be properly secured.
( b ) All transport vehicles used for the carriage of Class 1 (explosive) materials must be structurally serviceable as defined in § 176.172(a)(2).
( c ) Vehicles used to transport Class 1 (explosive) materials must conform to the requirements in §§ 177.834 and 177.835 of this subchapter.
( d ) Class 1 (explosive) materials which require special stowage must be transported in transport vehicles approved for the purpose by the Associate Administrator except that Class 1 (explosive) materials in compatibility group G or H may be carried in steel portable magazines or freight containers. Closed transport vehicles may be used as magazines; transport vehicles of other types may be used to transport Class 1 (explosive) materials which require ordinary stowage.
( e ) Class 1 (explosive) materials of different compatibility groups may not be stowed in the same vehicle except as allowed in § 176.144 of this subpart.
( f ) Vehicles containing different Class 1 (explosive) materials require no segregation from each other, except that these materials may be carried together under the provisions of § 176.144 of this subchapter. In all other instances, the vehicles must be “separated from” one another.
( g ) All transport vehicles used for the transport of Class 1 (explosive) materials must have lashing arrangements for securing the vehicle on the ship and preventing the moving of the vehicle on its springs during the sea passage.
( h ) Where a portable magazine or closed freight container is carried on a chassis, twist locks or other suitable securing arrangements must be provided and made secure.
[Amdt. 176-30, 55 FR 52696, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 66 FR 45384, Aug. 28, 2001; 68 FR 61942, Oct. 30, 2003]
#### § 213.355 Frog guard rails and guard faces; gage.

The guard check and guard face gages in frogs shall be within the limits prescribed in the following table—

| Class of track | Guard check gage | Guard face gage |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The distance between the gage line of a frog to the guard line1 of its guard rail or guarding face, measured across the track at right angles to the gage line,2 may not be less than— | The distance between guard lines,1 measured across the track at right angles to the gage line,2 may not be more than— |
| Class 6, 7, 8 and 9 track | 4′61/2′′ | 4′5′′ |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 A line along that side of the flangeway which is nearer to the center of the track and at the same elevation as the gage line. | | |
| 2 A line five-eighths of an inch below the top of the center line of the head of the running rail, or corresponding location of the tread portion of the track structure. | | |

[[78 FR 16112](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/78-FR-16112), Mar. 13, 2013]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, August 3, 1995 (108), Para 108.29 Leave of Absence]
[Page 1257]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.108.29  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--
  To Mr. YATES, for today after 10:30 p.m.;
  To Mr. WILLIAMS, for today and the balance of the week; and
  To Mr. ANDREWS of New Jersey, for today and the balance of the week.
  And then,
```
From: lucille_nordgren@comcast.net 

[mailto:lucille_nordgren@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:40 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lucille Nordgren 

PO Box 512 

Aptos, CA 95001
#### Daniel Ritchie *v.*Robert Weir.

— Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
EX 18.1


                      Preferability Letter




January 6, 1999




Mr. William F. Tolley
Chief Financial Officer
Chesapeake Corporation
P.O. Box 2350
Richmond, VA 23218-2350


Dear Mr. Tolley:

We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit
to your Form 10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have read management's justification for the change in
accounting related to the capitalization of certain timber costs
which were previously expensed as more fully described in the
Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.  Based
on our reading of the data and discussions with Company officials
about the business judgment and business planning factors
relating to the change, we believe management's justification to
be reasonable.  Accordingly, we concur that the newly adopted
accounting principle described above is preferable in the
Company's circumstances to the method previously applied.


Very truly yours,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP










                               -1-
§ 228.105 Additional requirements; construction within one-third mile (1,760 feet) (536 meters) of certain switching. ( a ) In addition to providing the information specified by § 228.103, a carrier seeking approval of a site located within one-third mile (1,760 feet) (536 meters) of any area where railroad switching or humping operations are performed involving any cars required to be placarded “EXPLOSIVES A” or “POISON GAS” or any DOT Specification 112A or 114A tank cars transporting flammable gas subject to FRA emergency order No. 5 shall establish by a supplementary statement certified by a corporate officer possessing authority over the subject matter that— ( 1 ) No feasible alternate site located at or beyond one-third mile from switching or humping operations is either presently available to the railroad or is obtainable within 3 miles (15,840 feet) (4,827 meters) of the reporting point for the employees who are to be housed in the sleeping quarters;
( 2 ) Natural or other barriers exist or will be created prior to occupancy of the proposed facility between the proposed site and any areas in which switching or humping operations are performed which will be adequate to shield the facility from the direct and severe effects of a hazardous materials accident/incident arising in an area of switching or humping operations;
( 3 ) The topography of the property is such as most likely to cause any hazardous materials unintentionally released during switching or humping to flow away from the proposed site; and
( 4 ) Precautions for ensuring employee safety from toxic gases or explosions such as employee training and evacuation plans, availability of appropriate respiratory protection, and measures for fire protection, have been considered.
( b ) In the absence of reliable records concerning traffic handled on trackage within the one-third mile area, it shall be presumed that the types of cars enumerated in paragraph (a) of this section are switched on that trackage; and the additional requirements of this section shall be met by the petitioning carrier, unless the carrier establishes that the switching of the enumerated cars will be effectively barred from the trackage if the petition is approved.
From: eglass121470@yahoo.com [mailto:eglass121470@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 6:42 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Eric Glass 

866 President Street #1 

Brooklyn, NY 11215
> FORM 10-KSBSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549 x**ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)     OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**   For the Fiscal Year Ended **March 31, 2004**  o**TRANSITION  REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)     OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**   For the transition period from                to                . 
Commission File **No. 08117**                            
**CHURCH LOANS & INVESTMENTS TRUST**SM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5125-N-32]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         August 10, 2007.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: August 2, 2007.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 07-3842 Filed 8-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-M
§ 172.420 FLAMMABLE SOLID label. ( a ) Except for size and color, the FLAMMABLE SOLID label must be as follows:
( b ) In addition to complying with § 172.407, the background on the FLAMMABLE SOLID label must be white with vertical red stripes equally spaced on each side of a red stripe placed in the center of the label. The red vertical stripes must be spaced so that, visually, they appear equal in width to the white spaces between them. The symbol (flame) and text (when used) must be overprinted. The text “FLAMMABLE SOLID” may be placed in a white rectangle.
[Amdt. 172-123, 56 FR 66257, Dec. 20, 1991]
-----Original Message----- 

From: sharon.wlosek@bnymellon.com [mailto:sharon.wlosek@bnymellon.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:26 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

sharon wlosek 

00 street 

South Amboy, NJ 08879
#### John Sparkhawk, Jr., as Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Charles M. Stoever, Appellant, *v.*Gillin Printing Company, Respondent.

*Sparkhawk*v. *Gillin Printing Co.,*131 App. Div. 900, affirmed.

(Argued June 14, 1910;

decided September 27, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 5, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defen dent entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for goods alleged to have been sold and delivered.

*Henry Siegrist,*Jr., for appellant.

*Wales F. Severance*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cüllen, Ch. J., Gray, IIaight, Yann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
#### John Wolff, *Respondent, v.*Oswego and Onondaga Insurance Company, *Appellant.*

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133208 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. ROBERTA HOPKINS, Personal Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Justices 

Olive Herford, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 133208 

 COA: 261867 

Genesee CC: 04-079449-NH 

JAMES E. GRAHAM, JR., M.D., 

JAMES E. GRAHAM, JR., M.D., P.C.,

FARAH TAHER, M.D., and PHAN ANH 

NGUYEN, 

 Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

HURLEY MEDICAL CENTER,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 20, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of Mullins v St Joseph Mercy Hosp (Docket No. 131879) is pending on appeal 

before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the 

present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in 

ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case. 

l0521 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2007 

 Clerk
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, August 1, 1995 (106), Para 106.22 Adjournment]
[Page 1237]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.106.22  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. BURTON, at 9 o'clock and 23 minutes p.m., the House 
adjourned.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: almorales9@yahoo.com [mailto:almorales9@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 5:55 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 02, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ana Lilia 

1119 Douglas St 

Los Angeles, CA 90026
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-929.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Assistance 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ITALY 

Signed at Fort Belvoir and Rome 

September 19 and 29, 2008 

with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 ITALY 

Defense: Assistance 

 Agreement signed at Fort Belvoir and Rome 

 September 19 and 29, 2008; 

 Entered into force September 29, 2008. 

 With annexes. 









Note: At the present time, the Treaty Office does not have the Italian text of this Agreement. If the Italian text becomes available, it will be added to this publication.