alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 211.25 Hearings. ( a ) A hearing will be held if required by statute or the Administrator finds it necessary or desirable.
( b ) Except for statutory hearings required to be on the record— ( 1 ) Hearings are fact-finding proceedings, and there are no formal pleadings or adverse parties;
( 2 ) Any rule issued in a proceeding in which a hearing is held is not based exclusively on the record of the hearing; and
( 3 ) Hearings are conducted in accordance with section 553 of title 5, U.S.C.; section 556 and 557 of title 5 do not apply to hearings held under this part.
( c ) The Administrator conducts or designates a representative to conduct any hearing held under this part. The Chief Counsel serves or designates a member of his staff to serve as legal officer at the hearing.
No. 01-15-00296-CV 

IN THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 

HOUSTON, TEXAS 

JESUS GARCIA 

Appellant 

v. 

DONNA GARCIA 

Appellee 

APPEAL FROM THE 257THJUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT 

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 

APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME 

TO FILE BRIEF 

Antonio Benavides 

Texas Bar No. 24031733 

855 Uvalde Rd., Suite C 

Houston, Texas 77015 

(713) 455-5551 

(713) 455-5558 (facsimile) 

Attorney for Appellant 

1 

ACCEPTED

01-15-00296-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

8/6/2015 4:28:10 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/6/2015 4:28:10 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME 

TO FILE BRRIEF 

Appellant, Costella Nicole Willis, asks the Court to extend the time to file her 

brief in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b). 

1. Appellant's brief is currently due on August 10, 2015. 

2. There is no specific deadline to file this motion to extend in accordance 

with Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(d). The Court has the authority to extend the time 

to file the brief. 

3. Appellant requests that her time to file the brief be set for October 10, 

2015, as Appellant's counsel, a sole practitioner, has just completed a jury trial 

and has already begun preparing for three more jury trials for the month of 

August, and simply needs more time to adequately prepare a brief in this case. 

4. No previous extension has been sought or granted to extend time to file 

Appellant's brief. 

5. Appellee, who is Pro Se, has not filed any documents in this case. 

6. The parties have not agreed to this motion. 

For these reasons, Appellant asks the Court to grant an extension of time to file 

her brief until at least October 10, 2015. 

The Law Offices of Antonio Benavides, P.C. 

855 Uvalde Rd., Suite C 

2 
Houston, Texas 77015 

Tel: (713) 455-5551 

Fax: (713) 455-5558 

By: /s/ ogn.tonio .13enavideA 

Antonio Benavides 

State Bar No. 24031733 

855 Uvalde R., Suite C 

Houston, Texas 77015 

(713) 455-5551 

(713) 455-5558 (facsimile) 

Attorney for Appellant 

Certificate of Conference 

Pursuant to Tex. Rules of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a)(5), I certify that counsel 

for Appellant, Antonio Benavides, has made a reasonable attempt to confer with all 

other parties about the merits of the motion and whether those parties oppose the 

motion. 

Is! entoltio fiettavIcici 

Antonio Benavides 

Certificate of Service 

Pursuant to Tex. Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5(e), 25.1(e), and Local Rule 4, 

the foregoing has been served on August 7, 2015 on Donna Garcia, Pro Se Appellee by 

Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested. 

Donna Garcia 

4026 Trout St., 

Houston, Texas 77093 

Is! eintonio epenavicleA 

Antonio Benavides 

3
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2287

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make S corporations eligible

for the rules applicable to real property subdivided for sale by

noncorporate taxpayers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 7, 1995

Mr. STARK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make

S corporations eligible for the rules applicable to real

property subdivided for sale by noncorporate taxpayers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. S CORPORATIONS ELIGIBLE FOR RULES APPLI4 CABLE TO REAL PROPERTY SUBDIVIDED FOR

5 SALE BY NONCORPORATE TAXPAYERS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 1237 of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to real prop8 erty subdivided for sale) is amended by striking ‘‘other
2

HR 2287 IH

1 than a corporation’’ and inserting ‘‘other than a C cor2 poration’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 subsection (a) shall apply to sales on or after January 1

5 of the year after the year of enactment.

Æ
<PAGE>
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of 
Bell Atlantic - Maryland, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 33-55852) of our report 
dated February 5, 1996, which includes an explanatory paragraph stating that 
the Company discontinued accounting for its operations in accordance with 
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects 
of Certain Types of Regulation," effective August 1, 1994, and changed its 
method of accounting for income taxes and postemployment benefits in 1993, on 
our audits of the financial statements and financial statement schedule of the 
Company as of December 31, 1995 and December 31, 1994, and for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1995, which report is included in this 
Annual Report on Form 10-K.


COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

2400 Eleven Penn Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 27, 1996
# United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 20

- 2061

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,

Plaintiff, Appellee ,

v.

LETTER FROM ALEXANDER HAMILTON TO THE MARQUIS DE LAFAYETTE DATED JULY 21, 1780,

Defendant in Rem ,

ALDRICH L. BOSS, as personal representative for the estate of STEWART R. CRANE,

Claimant, Appellant,

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Acting by and through The

Massachusetts Archives,

Claimant, Appellee

.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on October 6, 2021 is
corrected as follows:

On page 3, line 10, replace "Investigations" with "Investigation".

On page 6, line s 2, 3, 5, and 8 , replace "letter" with
"Letter".

On page 12, footnote 4, replace "letter" with "Lett er".

On page 19, line 9, add quotation marks around "shall".

On page 22, line 7, replace " Oneida Indian " with " Oneida
Indian Nation ".
From: anndelwiche@earthlink.net [mailto:anndelwiche@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:40 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Improvements in mental health contribute to significant benefits in 

physical and social health. Please keep this important benefit in 

mind! 

Sincerely, 

Ann Delwiche 

1402 Brookwood Dr 

La Crescent, MN 55947
#### Julia S. Newman, Plaintiff-Respondent, *v.*Julian Benedict, Defendant-Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

December, 1910.)

Reference — Jurisdiction and powers of referees and proceedings on reference — Effect of vacating order of reference.

In a ease brought to trial before a referee over the objection of the defendant, during the pendency of an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate the order of reference, where the order is finally vacated the proceedings before the referee are unauthorized; and a judgment entered upon his report is void.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Oity Court of the city of New York.

Robert L. Stanton, for appellant.

Alexander Thain and Otto G. Foelker, for respondent.

Guy, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $1,4J2.53, entered upon an order affirming the report of a referee. The judgment was dated the 23d day of February, 1910. On the 22d day of December, 1909, plaintiff’s attorney procured au order on defendant’s default at Special Term of the City Court of the city of New York, referring the issues to a referee to hear and determine. The defendant moved to vacate said order of reference, which motion was denied and an appeal taken *631from the order denying the motion. • On March 15, 1910, the Appellate Term of this court reversed said order and vacated the order of reference, and upon appeal taken to the Appellate Division said order was modified by providing “ that either party shall have leave to apply to the Special Term of the City Court of the city of New York for the appointment of a new referee in this action ”; and, as so modified, said order of the Appellate Term of this court was affirmed. Pending the determination of the‘appeal to the Appellate Term and subsequently to the Appellate Division, plaintiff, over defendant’s objection, brought the issues on for trial before the referee. Defendant’s attorney appeared before the referee and asked that-the hearing be adjourned pending the final determination on appeal of the motion to vacate; hut this motion -was denied, and the trial proceeded before the referee, resulting in a report in favor of plaintiff and the entry of judgment as aforesaid. The Appellate Term of this court having vacated the order of reference on which the judgment appealed from is based, and its order having been affirmed by the Appellate Division, the proceed'ings had before the-referee were unauthorized and the judgment based thereon is void. ' . .

The judgment appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with costs to appellant.

Platzek and G-avegan, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed.
§ 179.500-8 Openings in tanks. ( a ) Each end shall be closed by a cover made of forged steel. Covers shall be secured to ends of tank by through bolts or studs not entering interior of tank. Covers shall be of a thickness sufficient to meet test requirements of § 179.500-12 and to compensate for the openings closed by attachments prescribed herein. ( 1 ) It is also provided that each end may be closed by internal threading to accommodate an approved fitting. The internal threads as well as the threads on fittings for these openings shall be clean cut, even, without checks, and tapped to gauge. Taper threads are required and shall be of a length not less than as specified for American Standard taper pipe threads. External threading of an approved type shall be permissible on the internal threaded ends.
( b ) Joints between covers and ends and between cover and attachments shall be of approved form and made tight against vapor or liquid leakage by means of a confined gasket of suitable material.
§ 179.100-10 Postweld heat treatment. ( a ) After welding is complete, steel tanks and all attachments welded thereto must be postweld heat treated as a unit in compliance with the requirements of AAR Specifications for Tank Cars, appendix W (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter).
( b ) For aluminum tanks, postweld heat treatment is prohibited.
( c ) Tank and welded attachments, fabricated from ASTM A 240/A 240M (IBR, *see* § 171.7 of this subchapter), Type 304L or Type 316L materials do not require postweld heat treatment, but these materials do require a corrosion resistance test as specified in § 179.100-7(c)(2).
[Amdt. 179-10, 36 FR 21345, Nov. 6, 1971, as amended by Amdt. 179-47, 58 FR 50238, Sept. 24, 1993; Amdt. 179-52, 61 FR 28679, June 5, 1996; 67 FR 51660, Aug. 8, 2002; 68 FR 75758, 75759, Dec. 31, 2003]
#### Benton *v.*Barnet.

When notos secured by a mortgage are held by different persons, if each holder brings a foreclosure suit the actions may be consolidated, and the holders may have separate judgments.

*250Wbit ob Entry, to foreclose a mortgage. Facts found by tbe ■court.

The mortgage is tbe same as that in tbe suit *Noyes*v. Barnet, 57 N. H. 605, and is beld by Noyes. Benton bolds three and Noyes bolds one of the notes secured by tbe mortgage. Noyes’s suit was entered at tbe April term, 1874, and Benton’s at tbe April term, 1877. At tbe November term, 1876, Noyes obtained leave to amend by joining Benton as co-plaintiff, and filed tbe amendment at tbe November term, 1877, Benton objecting. At tbe November term, 1878, tbe defendant moved for a nonsuit in Benton’s suit because Noyes was not joined as co-plaintiff, which motion was granted unless tbe plaintiff would amend; and tbe plaintiff ■excepted. The plaintiff thereupon amended by joining Noyes as co-plaintiff; whereupon the defendant renewed bis motion for a non-suit because of tbe pendency of tbe prior action. Tbe motion was ■denied, and tbe defendant excepted. Tbe evidence tended to show a defence to tbe note beld by Noyes. The court found for tbe plaintiff, Benton, and ordered conditional judgment as of mortgage for tbe amount of tbe notes beld by him, to which tbe defendant excepted, and filed this bill of exceptions, which was allowed.

Ray, *Brew 8f*Jordan, for- tbe defendant.

*Benton Eutchins,*for tbe plaintiff.

Smith, J.

Tbe suit last brought should be consolidated with ¡the first suit, costs being regulated at tbe trial term. Benton need not wait until- Noyes has established his right to recover. Tbe holders of tbe notes may have separate judgments, and at tbe same or different terms. If Noyes recovers a separate judgment, tbe rights of tbe parties can be as well adjusted as if there were but ■one judgment for Benton and Noyes.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Stanley, J., did not sit: tbe others concurred.
§ 199.2 Applicability. ( a ) This part applies to pipeline operators only with respect to employees located within the territory of the United States, including those employees located within the limits of the “Outer Continental Shelf “ as that term is defined in the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331).
( b ) This part does not apply to any person for whom compliance with this part would violate the domestic laws or policies of another country.
( c ) This part does not apply to covered functions performed on— ( 1 ) Master meter systems, as defined in § 191.3 of this chapter; or
( 2 ) Pipeline systems that transport only petroleum gas or petroleum gas/air mixtures.
[Amdt. 199-19, 66 FR 47117, Sept. 11, 2001]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                            5

<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997
(UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

       

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     MAR-31-1998

<PERIOD-START>                        APR-01-1997

<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1997

<CASH>                                      17,092

<SECURITIES>                                     0

<RECEIVABLES>                            8,664,339

<ALLOWANCES>                                     0

<INVENTORY>                              5,210,659

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        13,947,745

<PP&E>                                 114,166,229

<DEPRECIATION>                          49,090,457

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          81,862,024

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    9,769,380

<BONDS>                                  6,245,410

<COMMON>                                   961,132


<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0

<PREFERRED>                                      0

<OTHER-SE>                              36,933,038

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            81,862,024

<SALES>                                 70,490,202

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        70,515,970

<CGS>                                   63,882,040

<TOTAL-COSTS>                           63,382,040

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         1,154,383

<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       2,077,543

<INCOME-PRETAX>                          3,402,004

<INCOME-TAX>                                     0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      3,402,004

<DISCONTINUED>                                   0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0

<CHANGES>                                        0

<NET-INCOME>                             3,402,004

<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 3.64

<EPS-DILUTED>                                 3.64
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.2
                                                                     -----------

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                      OF

                         CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                      OF

                       CLARK OIL & REFINING CORPORATION

                   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                   Adopted in accordance with the provisions
                   of Section 242 of the General Corporation
                          Law of the State of Delaware
                   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

          The undersigned, being the President and Secretary of Clark Oil &
Refining Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware do hereby certify as
follows:

          FIRST:  That the name of the Corporation is Clark Oil & Refining
Corporation.

          SECOND:  That the Certificate of Incorporation of the corporation was
filed by the Secretary of State of Delaware on the 8th day of February, 1988.

          THIRD:  That Article FIRST of the Certificate of Incorporation be and
it hereby is amended to read as follows:

                  "FIRST:      The name of the corporation is

                       Clark Refining & Marketing, Inc."

          FOURTH:  That the amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware by the
unanimous written consent of the holders of all outstanding shares entitled to
vote thereon, all in accordance with the provisions of Section 228 of the
General Corporation Law.
<PAGE>

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this certificate as
of the 3rd day of September, 1993.


                                  CLARK OIL & REFINING CORPORATION



                                  /s/ Paul D. Melnuk
                                  -------------------------
                                  Paul D. Melnuk, President


ATTEST:


/s/ Patrick F. Heider
----------------------------
Patrick F. Heider, Secretary



                                       2
Fw: Status Update on NAAQS Review 

Lydia Wegman 

to: 

Tricia Crabtree 

06/02/2010 06:50 PM 

Show Details 

 From: Lydia Wegman 

 Sent: 05/26/2010 06:29 PM EDT 

 To: "Laity, James A." <James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov> 

 Cc: Ron Evans 

 Subject: Re: Status Update on NAAQS Review 

Thanks Jim. I just left you a voicemail asking about the comments so I'm glad to have this update. I'll plan to talk to you in

the AM. 

 From: "Laity, James A." [James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov] 

 Sent: 05/26/2010 06:07 PM AST 

 To: Lydia Wegman 

 Cc: Ron Evans 

 Subject: Status Update on NAAQS Review 

Lydia, I promised you interagency RIA comments today and I am not able to deliver, my apologies but we are

very close and should be able to get to you in the morning.  We have also made substantial progress on the

implementation comments we discussed, but need a little more time.  Will touch bases in the morning.  ‐‐ jim   

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\tcrabtre\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web2444.htm 6/2/2010
-----Original Message----- 

From: weneedtodance@yahoo.com [mailto:weneedtodance@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 3:08 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

David Mock 

611 Manzanita Ave 

Sunnyvale, CA 94085
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 7, 1995 (111), Para 111.9 DOD Appropriations]
[Page 1310]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.111.9  dod appropriations

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HOBSON, pursuant to House Resolution 205 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the further consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 2126) making appropriations for the Department of Defense 
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes.
  Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Chairman of the Committee of the Whole, resumed the 
chair; and after some time spent therein,
```
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report basedon such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting;5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 13, 2010         */s/ Allen O. Jones, Jr.*   Allen O. Jones, Jr.   Senior Vice President and CFO