alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
,'IEo Stq,,,

S 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

0 

~~Tqt PROt-G~\ 

SEP 2 9 i014 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Mr. Jose R. Franco 

Carlsbad Field Office 

LJ.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, New Mexico 88221-3090 

Dear Mr. Franco: 

This letter is to inform you that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has begun the completeness 

review of the March 2014 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Compliance Recertification Application 

(CRA-2014) for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). In accordance with our WIPP Compliance 

E`riteria (40 CFR Part 194), a full technical evaluation of the recertification shall not begin until the EPA 

has informed the Secretary of the DOE in writing that the Agency has deemed the recertification 

application as complete. This is an administrative step to ensure that the application addresses all the 

required regulatory elements. 

'rhe completeness determination does not reflect any conclusion regarding the WIPP's continued 

compliance with the EPA's radioactive waste disposal regulations (40 CFR Part 191, Subparts B and C) 

or W I PP Compliance Criteria. A Federal Register notice formally announcing receipt of the CRA-2014 

and initiation of the EPA's completeness review will be published in the near future. 

Please note that our completeness review has been delayed due to the ongoing response to the February 

2014 radiological incident at the WIPP. We are considering how the incident may affect our review of 

the CRA-2414. Although the incident took place after the preparation of the CRA-2014, the DOE has 

indicated that changes will need to be made to the WIPP disposal system in order to reopen the facility 

and that the Department will provide supplemental information on the incident and identify potential 

ramifications on compliance. 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable 0 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
1 appreciate the helpful and cooperative interactions with DOE staff to date. We look forward to 

continued cooperation from your staff as we move forward with our review. If you have any questions 

concerning our review of the CRA-2014, please contact Kathy Economy at (202) 343-9844 

(cconomy.kathleen@epa.gov). 

D. Edwards 

Radiation Protection Division 

cc: Electronic Distribution
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, October 11, 1995 (126), Para 126.6 Message from the Senate]
[Page 1499]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.126.6  message from the senate

  A message from the Senate by Mr. Lundregan, one of its clerks, 
announced that the Senate had passed without amendment a concurrent 
resolution of the House of the following title:

       H. Con. Res. 94. Concurrent resolution authorizing the use 
     of the rotunda of the Capitol for a dedication ceremony 
     incident to the placement of a bust of Raoul Wallenberg in 
     the Capitol.
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 153 (Thursday, August 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 44820]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3869]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Meeting; Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act 
(Title VIII, Pub. L. 108-447)

AGENCY: USDA, Forest Service.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Southern Region Recreation Resource Advisory Committee 
will hold its second meeting at the Advantage West Economic Development 
Center, 134 Wright Brothers Way, Fletcher, North Carolina (Asheville 
area). The purpose of the meeting is to receive recommendations 
concerning recreation fee proposals on areas managed by the Forest 
Service in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, 
Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, 
Texas, Virginia, and the territory of Puerto Rico; and to discuss other 
items of interest related to the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement 
Act of 2004.
    A final detailed agenda, with any additions/corrections to agenda 
topics, location, field trips and meeting times, will be sent to 
regional media sources at least 14 days before the meeting, and hard 
copies can also be mailed or sent via fax. Individuals who need special 
assistance such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, or who wish a hard copy of each agenda, should contact 
Caroline Mitchell at P.O. Box 1270, Hot Springs, AR 71902 no later than 
10 days prior to the meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held September 26-27, 2007.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Advantage West Economic 
Development Center, 134 Wright Brothers Way, Fletcher, North Carolina. 
Send written comments to Cheryl Chatham, Designated Federal Official 
for the Southern Recreation RAC, U.S. Forest Service, P.O. Box 1270, 
Hot Springs, AR 71902.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl Chatham, Designated Federal 
Official, U.S. Forest Service, P.O. Box 1270, Hot Springs, AR 71902.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. 
However, persons who wish to bring recreation fee matters to the 
attention of the Committee may file written statements with the 
Committee staff before or after the meeting. A public input session 
will be provided and individuals who made written requests by September 
19, 2007, will have the opportunity to address the Committee at the 
meeting.
    The Recreation RAC is authorized by the Federal Land Recreation 
Enhancement Act, which was signed into law by President Bush in 
December 2004.

    Dated: August 2, 2007.
Cheryl G. Chatham,
Designated Federal Officer, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 07-3869 Filed 8-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


         Information relating to certain of the subsidiaries of Peoples Heritage
Financial Group, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 is set forth below. All of the
indicated subsidiaries are directly or indirectly wholly-owned by Peoples
Heritage Financial Group, Inc.



Direct Subsidiaries:

                                                 JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
         NAME

Peoples Heritage Bank                              Maine
Bank of New Hampshire Corporation                  New Hampshire
Peoples Heritage Merger Corp.                      Maine
Peoples Heritage Capital Trust I                   Delaware

Indirect Subsidiaries:

                                                 JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
         NAME

Bank of New Hampshire(1)                           New Hampshire
Family Bank, FSB(2)                                United States
Heritage Investment Planning Group, Inc. (3)       Maine
Peoples Heritage Leasing Corp. (3)                 Maine
MPN Holdings (holding company for                  Maine
  insurance brokerage subsidiaries) (3)





--------------------------
  (1)  Subsidiary of Bank of New Hampshire Corporation.
  (2)  Subsidiary of Peoples Heritage Merger Corp.
  (3)  Subsidiary of Peoples Heritage Bank.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Royal BodyCare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Steven E. Brown, Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Steven E. BrownSteven E. BrownVice President  FinanceChief Financial OfficerMarch 29, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Royal BodyCare, Inc. and will be retained by Royal BodyCare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of the Kings County Trust Company, as Executor of and Under the Last Will and Testament of John Doyle, Deceased.

(Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,

September, 1910.)

Wills — Interpretation and construction — Disposal of the entire estate — Effect of death, uncertainty or invalidity or incapacity of legatees or devisees — Effect of death of beneficiary in life of testator — Of legatee of share in residue.

Where a testator, in disposing of' his residuary estate, gave two-thirds thereof to A. and the other one-tliird thereof to B., and B. died before the testator, the latter’s share does not pass to A. under the will but remains undisposed of by testamentary disposition.

Motion to open and modify a decree.

Gillespie & O’Connor, for Sarah Tyndall, petitioner.

James S. McDonough, for Annie Dunn, of next of kin, respondent.

Edward R. O’Malley, Attorney-General, for State Treasurer, respondent.

George V. Brower, for the Kings Comity Trust Company.

J. Harry Snook, special guardian.

Ketcham, S.

This is a motion to open and modify a decree upon accounting, made on September 26, 1007, upon the ground that a portion of the estate was disposed of upon *an*erroneous construction of the decedent’s will.

If there was any mistake in the respect alleged, it was a judicial mistake, to he redressed only by appeal. But whether the motion he dismissed or entertained, the result must be the same.

The will contained a residuary gift as follows:

> *142*“*Two-thirds thereof unto Mistress S. Tyndall * * * The other one-third thereof unto Ellen McGuirk.”

The Ellen McGuirk named in the will died before the death of the testator. The decree proceeded upon the theory that as to the one-third which would have gone to Ellen McGuirk, if she had survived the testator, there was intestacy.

It is now argued that, upon the failure of the gift of the one-third, the surviving residuary legatee, under a gift to her of two-thirds of the residue, became entitled to the'whole residue; and it is sought to amend the decree accordingly.

It is said to be “ clear upon the authorities that a part of the residue, of which the disposition falls, will not accrue in augmentation of the remaining parts as a residue of a residue hut, instead of resuming the nature of residue, devolves as undisposed of.” Booth v. Baptist Church, 126 N. Y. 215, 245.

This expression of the law has been repeated and maintained since it was first used by the master of the rolls, in Scrymasher v. Northcote, 1 Swanst. 570; Herzog v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co., 177 N. Y. 86, 96.

Hnder the rule thus defined the decree was right-and the motion is 'denied.

Motion denied.
#### § 213.9 Classes of track: operating speed limits.

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section and §§ 213.57(b), 213.59(a), 213.113(a), and 213.137(b) and (c), the following maximum allowable operating speeds apply—

| Over track that meets all of the requirements prescribed in this part for— | The maximum allowable operating speed for freight trains is— | The maximum allowable operating speed for passenger trains is— |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Excepted track | 10 | N/A |
| Class 1 track | 10 | 15 |
| Class 2 track | 25 | 30 |
| Class 3 track | 40 | 60 |
| Class 4 track | 60 | 80 |
| Class 5 track | 80 | 90 |

[In miles per hour]

(b) If a segment of track does not meet all of the requirements of its intended class, it is reclassified to the next lowest class of track for which it does meet all of the requirements of this part. However, if the segment of track does not at least meet the requirements of Class 1 track, operations may continue at Class 1 speeds for a period of not more than 30 days without bringing the track into compliance, under the authority of a person designated under § 213.7(a), after that person determines that operations may safely continue and subject to any limiting conditions specified by such person.

[63 FR 34029, June 22, 1998, as amended at 85 FR 63388, Oct. 7, 2020]
§ 219.502 Pre-employment alcohol testing. ( a ) A railroad may, but is not required to, conduct pre-employment alcohol testing under this part. If a railroad chooses to conduct pre-employment alcohol testing, the railroad must comply with the following requirements: ( 1 ) The railroad must conduct a pre-employment alcohol test before the first performance of regulated service by an employee, regardless of whether he or she is a new employee or a first-time transfer to a position involving the performance of regulated service.
( 2 ) The railroad must treat all employees performing regulated service the same for the purpose of pre-employment alcohol testing (*i.e.,* a railroad must not test some regulated employees and not others.)
( 3 ) It must conduct the pre-employment tests after making a contingent offer of employment or transfer, subject to the employee passing the pre-employment alcohol test.
( 4 ) It must conduct all pre-employment alcohol tests using the alcohol testing procedures of part 40 of this title.
( 5 ) If a regulated employee's Federal pre-employment test indicates an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater, a railroad may not allow him or her to begin performing regulated service until he or she has completed the Federal return-to-duty process under § 219.104(d).
( b ) As used in subpart H of this part with respect to a test authorized under this subpart, the term regulated employee includes an applicant for pre-employment testing only. If an applicant declines to be tested before the testing process commences, no record may be maintained of the declination. The determination of when an alcohol test commences must be made according to the provisions of § 40.243(a) of this title.
[66 FR 41973, Aug. 9, 2001, as amended at 81 FR 37936, June 10, 2016]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 20, 1995 (118), Para 118.32 Adjournment]
[Page 1427]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.118.32  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. HAYWORTH, at 12 o'clock midnight, the House 
adjourned.
```
§ 1503.201 Reports of violations. ( a ) Any person who knows of a violation of a TSA requirement should report it to appropriate personnel of any TSA office.
( b ) TSA will review each report made under this section, together with any other information TSA may have that is relevant to the matter reported, to determine the appropriate response, including additional investigation or administrative or legal enforcement action.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, June 30, 1995 (90), Para 90.27 Subsequent Action on a Reported Bill Sequentially Referred]
[Page 1092]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.90.27  subsequent action on a reported bill sequentially referred

  Under clause 5 of rule X the following action was taken by the 
Speaker:

       Referral to the Committee on Science of H.R. 1175 extended 
     for a period ending not later than July 11, 1995.
```
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2191

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel SUNDOWN.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 3, 1995

Mr. METCALF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

SUNDOWN.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 46,

6 United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may

7 issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate en8 dorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the
2

•HR 2191 IH

1 vessel SUNDOWN (United States official number

2 293434).

Æ
#### Frank Griffin, Respondent, *v.*William McMahon et al., Respondents, and Martha A. Mallory, Appellant.

*Griffin*v. *McMahon,*131 App. Div. 925, affirmed.

(Argued December 7, 1910;

decided January 3, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered April 6, 1909, affirming an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action of partition.

*Martha A.*Mallory, appellant, in person.

*Thomas F. Rogers*for plaintiff, respondent.

*Frank J. Saxton*for defendants, respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Not voting: Werner, J. Not sitting: Collin, J.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, October 11, 1995 (126), Para 126.10 Civilian Science Research Authorization]
[Page 1500]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.126.10  civilian science research authorization

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HEFLEY, pursuant to House Resolution 234 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the consideration of the bill 
(H.R. 2405) to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 1996 and 1997 
for civilian science activities of the Federal Government, and for other 
purposes.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HEFLEY, by unanimous consent, designated 
Mr. KINGSTON as Chairman of the Committee of the Whole.
  The Acting Chairman, Mr. SHAYS, assumed the Chair; and after some time 
spent therein,
```
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.54 Accident reports. ( a ) Each operator that experiences an accident that is required to be reported under § 195.50 must, as soon as practicable, but not later than 30 days after discovery of the accident, file an accident report on DOT Form 7000-1.
( b ) Whenever an operator receives any changes in the information reported or additions to the original report on DOT Form 7000-1, it shall file a supplemental report within 30 days.
[Amdt. 195-39, 53 FR 24950, July 1, 1988, as amended by Amdt. 195-95, 75 FR 72907, Nov. 26, 2010]
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 23

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-87210 on Form S-8 of Premcor Inc. of our report dated February 14, 2003
(March 6, 2003 as to Note 22), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Premcor Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

   We also consent to the reference to us under the reading "Selected Financial
Data" in such Annual Report.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 10, 2003
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending February 22, 2014

|Filer                                  | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                                 
|-------------------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|BAY COMMERCIAL BANK                    | * 18C* Branch  | Bay Commercial Bank, Walnut Creek, California, to merge with Community Bank of San Joaquin, Stockton, California, and thereby acquire two branch offices.                         | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                             | Not available 
|Federal Register:                      | Not applicable
|TAIPEI FUBON COMMERCIAL BANK CO., LTD. | FBSEA          | Taipei Fubon Commercial Bank Co., Ltd,  Taipei, Taiwan, requests to establish a representative office in San Jose, California,  pursuant to section 211.24(a)(1) of Regulation K. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                             | Not available 
|Federal Register:                      | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Second Quarter of 2014 (April 1, 2014 - June 30, 2014)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
[Strafford,

June, 1882.]

#### Barker, *Ex'r, v.*Hayes *& a.*

Bill in Equity, by an executor, for instructions as to cutting timber on lands held in trust, and as to tbe distribution of a trust fund. Heard on bill and answers.

*Woodman $ Whittemore,*for the plaintiff.

*Frink ft*Batchelder, for the defendants.

Clark, J.

By the will unlimited authority is conferred upon the executor in the management of the trust estate, and he is authorized to cut and dispose of the timber, if in his judgment it ■will be of advantage to the estate. So, also, as to the distribution of the fund. By the terms of the will it is to continue so long as the executor deems proper, and the executor can distribute it when he deems it proper to do so.

*Case discharged.*

Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.