alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: dragonmk@gmail.com [mailto:dragonmk@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:41 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Michael Field 

2430 cromwell 

Austin, TX 78741
-----Original Message----- 

From: nchambers7@comcast.net [mailto:nchambers7@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:35 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jeannine Chambers 

3501 Meridian Ave. N. 

Seattle, WA 98103
H. R. 2203

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

An Act

To reauthorize the tied aid credit program of the Export-Import Bank of the United

States, and to allow the Export-Import Bank to conduct a demonstration project.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIED AID CREDIT PROGRAM.

(a) Section 10(c)(2) of the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945

(12 U.S.C. 635i–3(c)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘1995’’ and inserting

‘‘1997’’.

(b) Section 10(e) of the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 (12

U.S.C. 635i–3(e)) is amended by striking the first sentence and

inserting the following: ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated

to the Fund such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal

years 1996 and 1997.’’.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT.

Notwithstanding section 4701(a)(1)(A) of title 5, United States

Code, the Export-Import Bank of the United States may conduct

a demonstration project in accordance with section 4703 of such

title.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Affirmed October 16, 1917,

rehearing denied March 12, 1918.

#### STATE *v.*AUSPLUND.*

(171 Pac. 395.)

From Multnomah: John P. Kavanaugh, Judge.

On petition for rehearing.

Denied.

*Messrs. Logon & Smith*and *Mr. John J. Fitzgerald,*for the petition.

*Mr. G. G. Hindmcm,*Deputy District Attorney, for the State.

Department 1.

*

For former opinion, see 86 Or. 121 (167 Pac. 1019).

Mr. Justice Benson

delivered the opinion of the court.

Counsel for defendant has presented an exceedingly vigorous argument for a rehearing based upon the contention that affidavits of jurors offered for the purpose of impeaching their verdict ought to be considered by the court upon a motion for a new trial. However, nothing is said therein that has not had very serious consideration of this court upon several occasions and yet we have not been able to arrive at a conclusion which would reverse the doctrine announced in *Cline*v. *Broy,*1 Or. 89, and consistently followed ever since. Nothing can be added at this time to the original opinion herein, to which we adhere. The petition is denied. Affirmed. Rehearing Denied.

Mr. 'Chief Justice McBride, Mr. Justice Burnett and Mr. Justice Harris concur.
-----Original Message----- 

From: smhauter@comcast.net [mailto:smhauter@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:19 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sonja Hauter 

480 Desnoyer Ave 

Saint Paul, MN 55104
-----Original Message----- 

From: llmulka@msn.com [mailto:llmulka@msn.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 11:53 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

 As a physician, I know tha addressing mental health needs is extremely 

important in order to address other chronic health issues such as 

diabetes and cardiac issues. 

Sincerely, 

Linda Mulka 

27609 Rancho Sawatch 

Buena Vista, CO 81211
§ 67.131 Forfeited vessels. In addition to any other submissions required by this part, the owner of a forfeited vessel applying for a Certificate of Documentation for that vessel must submit the following: ( a ) Where the vessel has been adjudged forfeit, or the proceeds of the sale of the vessel have been adjudged forfeit to the Federal Government of the United States by a Federal District Court, a copy of the court order certified by an official of the court;
( b ) Where the vessel was forfeited to the Federal Government of the United States under an administrative forfeiture action, an affidavit from an officer of the agency which performed the forfeiture who has personal knowledge of the particulars of the vessel's forfeiture or a Declaration of Forfeiture issued by the agency which performed the forfeiture.
-----Original Message----- 

From: waynestiefvater@gmail.com [mailto:waynestiefvater@gmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:47 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Wayne E. Stiefvater 

38734 253rd Street 

Plankinton, SD 57368
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Somanetics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
we, Bruce J. Barrett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
William M. Iacona, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Controller and
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Dated: June 30, 2006                    /s/ Bruce J. Barrett
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Bruce J. Barrett, President and Chief
                                        Executive Officer


Dated: June 30, 2006                    /s/ William M. Iacona
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        William M. Iacona, Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer, Controller and
                                        Treasurer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6076

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus STEVEN P. LAWSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (7:00-cr-00955-MBS; 7:05-cv-01301-MBS) Submitted: September 27, 2006 Decided: October 16, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven P. Lawson, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Steven P. Lawson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lawson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
-----Original Message----- 

From: Russ@designvideo.net [mailto:Russ@designvideo.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 8:28 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 04, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Russell Norden 

1744 10TH St 

Orlando, FL 32820
\ O S?.

PRO' UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

The Honorable JoDe Goudy Chairman of the Yakama Tribal Council Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation Post Office Box 151, Fort Road Toppenish, Washington 98948 Dear Chairman Goudy: Thank you for your letter of September 29, 2014, to the Environmental Protection Agency encouraging the EPA to begin federal promulgation of water quality standards for Washington State. I very much appreciate the significance of ensuring that protected treaty-reserved rights to harvest and manage natural resources can be exercised without placing tribal members at a greater health risk. This can be accomplished by establishing human health criteria that protect the designated uses of waters and reflect the best available regional and local data. This matter is of great importance to me and the national water quality standards program. The EPA, working jointly between Region 10 and headquarters, is evaluating the progress and proposals that Washington State has made in revising its water quality standards, and a statement of our next steps will be made shortly. Again, thank you for your letter expressing the views of your tribes on this significant issue. If you have questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me, or your staff may contact Elizabeth Southerland, Director of the Office of Science and Technology, at 

### 202-566-0430, or 

### southerland.elizabeth(epa.gov

.

Kenneth J. Kopocis Deputy Assistant Administrator

Internet Address (URL) . http //www epagov Recycled/Recyclable . Pnnted wLth Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 1000/0 Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000019731
<NAME> CHESAPEAKE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      62,400,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              127,600,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,100,000
<INVENTORY>                                102,700,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           313,400,000
<PP&E>                                     872,400,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             385,900,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             979,400,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      157,600,000
<BONDS>                                    270,400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,400,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 419,900,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               979,400,000
<SALES>                                    950,400,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           959,000,000
<CGS>                                      679,800,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              884,200,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,600,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               700,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          18,900,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             55,800,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                21,800,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         34,000,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                   13,300,000
<NET-INCOME>                                47,300,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.19
        

</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 16, 2018

NO. 03

- 18

- 00166

- CV

Appellant s , Kimberly McNeely, Acting Director of PARD, in her Official Capacity; and the City of Austin// Cross

- Appellant, Watertight Endeavors, Inc. d/b/a Austin Party Cruises

v.

Appellee, Watertight Endeavors, Inc. d/b/a Austin Party Cruises// Cross

- Appellee s , Kimberly McNeely, Acting Director of PARD, in her Off icial Capacity; and the City of Austin

APPEAL FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVI S COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON, AND BOURLAN D

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT S ’ MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the tr i a l court on March 6, 2018. The

parties have filed motion s to dismiss the appeal and the cross

- appeal , and having considered the

motion s , the Court agrees that the motion s should b e granted. Therefore, the Court grants the

motion s and dismisses the appeal and the cross

- appeal. Each party shall bear their own costs

relating to the appeal and the cross

- appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending February 12, 2011

|Filer                           | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|FIRST CONNECTICUT BANCORP, INC. | * 3A1         | First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc., Farmington, Connecticut to acquire 100% of the outstanding capital stock of Farmington Bank, Farmington, Connecticut, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act, in connection with the conversion of the holding company from mutual to stock form. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:03/10/2011
|Newspaper:                      | Not available
|Federal Register:               | 03/10/2011   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Presidential Documents

46137 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 158 

Thursday, August 16, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of August 15, 2007 

Continuation of Emergency Regarding Export Control Regulations 

On August 17, 2001, consistent with the authority provided to me under 

the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 170l et seq.), 

I issued Executive Order 13222. In that order, I declared a national emergency 

with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, 

foreign policy, and economy of the United States in light of the expiration 

of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 

2401 et seq.). Because the Export Administration Act has not been renewed 

by the Congress, the national emergency declared on August 17, 2001, must 

continue in effect beyond August 17, 2007. Therefore, in accordance with 

section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am 

continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 

13222. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted 

to the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

August 15, 2007. [FR Doc. 07–4055 

Filed 8–15–07; 11:01 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICESGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
`[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 28, 1995 (122), Para 122.22 Consideration of the Conference Report on H.R. 2126]
[Page 1464]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.122.22  consideration of the conference report on h.r. 2126

  Mr. GOSS, by direction of the Committee on Rules, called up the 
following resolution (H. Res. 232):

       Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be 
     in order to consider the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R. 2126) making appropriations for the Department of 
     Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and 
     for other purposes. All points of order against the 
     conference report and against its consideration are waived.

  When said resolution was considered.
  After debate,
  On motion of Mr. GOSS, the previous question was ordered on the 
resolution to its adoption or rejection.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House agree to said resolution?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HEFLEY, announced that the yeas had it.
  Mr. YATES objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  A quorum not being present,
  The roll was called under clause 4, rule XV, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

Yeas

284

When there appeared

<3-line {>

Nays

139`
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2706

_____________________________
D OMINIQUE M ACON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

. December 7, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , W ETHERELL , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9. 331

.

_____________________________2 Dominique Macon, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.