alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fifth Anniversary of USA Freedom Corps, 2007

The great strength of our Nation is found in the heroic kindness, courage, and self-sacrifice of the American people. Every day, individuals show the good heart of our country by volunteering to help make someone's life better. Since 2002, the USA Freedom Corps has provided access to volunteer opportunities for millions of Americans. On the fifth anniversary of the USA Freedom Corps, we honor volunteers who give their time and talents to make a difference in the lives of others, and we recognize that helping those in need makes America a more hopeful country. 

The USA Freedom Corps was created to encourage Americans to answer the call to serve a cause greater than themselves. By matching willing volunteers with opportunities in their communities, the USA Freedom Corps brings Americans together to mentor children, assist the elderly, clean up neighborhoods, and perform countless acts of generosity. The USA Freedom Corps has helped support national service programs such as AmeriCorps, Citizen Corps, Peace Corps, and Senior Corps. Through programs like these, volunteers all across the country bring comfort and kindness to people at home and abroad. 

Through the USA Freedom Corps website at volunteer.gov, all Americans can find ways to serve in our country's armies of compassion. By answering the universal call to help a neighbor, individual Americans can transform towns and cities into more caring communities and neighborhoods and make America a better place. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim January 29, 2007, as the Fifth Anniversary of the USA Freedom Corps. I call upon the citizens of this great country to find ways to volunteer and help their fellow Americans. I commend the efforts of the USA Freedom Corps and all those who have already answered the call to serve, and I encourage all Americans to give of their time, energy, and talents to make America even stronger. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fifth day of January, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07-418

Billing code 3195-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Donald J. Torbert, Jr., certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PAB Bankshares, Inc;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
   a.) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b.) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c.) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a.) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b.) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  
 Date: November 14, 2003

By:

/s/ Donald J. Torbert, Jr.Donald J. Torbert, Jr.
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer of the registrant)
#### Reid *v.*McQuesten.

Damages for the breach by a partner of his agreement to sell to his co-partner an undivided part of certain property, and that the whole should thereupon be the property of the firm, cannot be allowed in the settlement of the partnership accounts.

Bill in Equity, to settle a partnership. Facts found by a referee. The plaintiff and the defendant were copartners in the business of cutting and selling wood and timber. The plaintiff, being the owner of certain land called the Doctor lot, in November, 1870, verbally agreed to sell to the defendant one undivided half of the wood and timber standing thereon for $4,000, and that the same should then be the property of the firm. Under this agreement a small portion of the wood and timber was taken off, when, in January, 1872, the purchase-money not having been paid, the plaintiff mortgaged the lot, and notified the defendant that he would be allowed to cut no more wood or timber therefrom. The defendant claimed that in the adjustment of the partnership accounts he ought to be allowed damages equal to the sum which he would have realized if all the remaining wood and timber on the Doctor lot had been taken off and disposed of ; but the referee disallowed the claim. The court ordered judgment on the report, and the defendant excepted.

*C. H. Burns*(with -whom was R. *B.*Barnes), for the plaintiff.

. *Jf. S. H A. Gutter*and *A. W.*Sawyer, for the defendant.

Cabpenteb, J.

The agreement for the sale of the undivided half of the wood and timber on the Doctor lot, to be taken off at a future indefinite time, was void under the statute of frauds. *Howe*v. Batchelder, 49 N. H. 204. But if it were valid, the defendant’s *422remedy is to be sought, not in this proceeding, but in an action at law upon the contract for a breach of it. Partnership business only will be adjusted upon a settlement of the partnership accounts in equity. The agreement was not a partnership transaction, but the individual engagement of the parties with each other preliminary to the formation of a partnership in respect to the property covered by it. That agreement not having been performed, the wood and timber never became the property of the partnership. *Venning*v. Leckie, 13 East 7; *Gale*v. Leckie, 2 Stark. 107; *Glover*v. Tuck, 24 Wend. 153; 1 Story Eq. Jur., *s.*665.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
#### § 179.101 Individual specification requirements applicable to pressure tank car tanks.

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

At 66 FR 45186, Aug. 28, 2001, an amendment published amending a table in § 179.101. No text or table appears in § 179.101.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

WATER HEATER WORKSHOP

June 24, 1997

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Room 1E-245

Purpose of Workshop: The objective of the workshop will be to discuss the process and

methodology to be utilized throughout the water heater standards

rulemaking process.

Outcomes of Workshop: To agree upon the process and the tools to be used for the water

heater rulemaking. Determination on how to proceed with

screening and engineering analysis.

Draft Agenda

9:00 - 9:30 am Opening Remarks, Introductions, Agenda Review

9:30 - 9:45 am Overview of Water Heater Rulemaking Schedule

9:45 - 10:30 am Open Discussion on Rulemaking Framework

- Issues for Analysis

- Analytical Methods and Tools

- Data Requirement and Data Collection Methods

- Industry Characterization

- Identification of Experts and Other Interested Parties

- Identification of Contractor Qualifications

10:30 - 10:45 am Break

10:45 - Noon Continue Discussion on Rulemaking Framework

Noon - 1:00 pm Lunch (On your own)

1:00 - 2:15 pm Discussion on Technology Assessment and Screening Analysis

2:15 - 2:30 pm Break

2:30 - 3:00 pm Issues to be Resolved

3:00 - 3:30 pm Next Steps

3:30 - 3:45 pm Open Discussion on How to Improve Future Workshops

3:45 - 4:00 pm Closing Remarks - Adjournment

EE-RM-97-900 COMMENT 01C
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-60672 INSURASOURCE, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff - Appellant v. COWLES & CONNELL OF NEW YORK, INCORPORATED; COWLES & CONNELL OF CONNECTICUT, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 2:11-CV-76 Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * We affirm the well-reasoned opinion of the district court, dismissing this case for lack of personal jurisdiction. With respect to the financing agreements, John A. Rocco, I n c orporated,
was not an agent of the appellees , a n d Rocco’s conduct is therefore not attributable to the appellees. With respect to the insurance agree m e n t s , the appellees did not make any contracts with a resident of Mississippi, commit any U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June11 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion s houldnot * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-60672 Document: 00511882747 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/11/2012No. 11-60672

torts in Mississippi, or otherwise d o business in Mississippi. Instead, the appellees sold insurance to New Jersey insureds. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 11-60672 Document: 00511882747 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/11/2012
> Report ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting FirmThe Board of Trust Managers and Shareholders        Church Loans & Investments Trust        Amarillo, Texas 
We have audited theaccompanying balance sheets of Church Loans & Investments Trust (a realestate investment trust) as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, and the relatedstatements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the yearsthen ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of theTrust’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesefinancial statements based on our audits. 

We conducted our audits inaccordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit toobtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free ofmaterial misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidencesupporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An auditalso includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimatesmade by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statementpresentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for ouropinion. 

In our opinion, thefinancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,the financial position of Church Loans & Investments Trust as ofMarch 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cashflows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally acceptedaccounting principles. 

Clifton Gunderson LLP

Amarillo, Texas        May 3, 2004

-16-

----
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 25, 2011

h0718 

# Order

July 25, 2011

142601

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142601 COA: 300131 Wayne CC: 05-006126-01-FC MARVIN L. JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the January 6, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 22-40135 

Summary Calendar 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Joel Torres-Robles, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:21-CR-1810-1 

Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joel TorresRobles has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Torres-Robles has not filed a response. We have 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

August 26, 2022 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 22-40135 Document: 00516449739 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/26/2022
No. 22-40135 

2 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for 

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. 

R. 42.2. 

Case: 22-40135 Document: 00516449739 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/26/2022
§ 174.106 “Order-Notify” or “C.O.D.” shipments, Division 1.1 or 1.2 (explosive) materials. ( a ) A carrier may not accept for transportation Division 1.1 or 1.2 (explosive) materials, detonators, or detonating primers in any quantity when consigned to “order-notify” or “C.O.D.”, except on a through bill of lading to a place outside the United States.
( b ) A carrier may not accept for transportation Division 1.1 or 1.2 (explosive) materials, detonators, or detonating primers which the shipper consigns to himself unless the shipper has a resident representative to receive them at the delivery point.
( c ) A carrier may not accept Division 1.1 or 1.2 (explosive) materials for transportation subject to “stop-off privileges en route for partial loading or unloading.”
[Amdt. 174-26, 41 FR 16092, Apr. 15, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 174-36, 44 FR 70732, Dec. 10, 1979; Amdt. 174-68, 55 FR 52682, Dec. 21, 1990; 66 FR 45383, Aug. 28, 2001]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial extracted from the unaudited
Consolidated Balance Sheets, Statement of Operations and Statement of Cash Flows
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,276
<SECURITIES>                                     8,115
<RECEIVABLES>                                      605
<ALLOWANCES>                                        47
<INVENTORY>                                        401
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,594
<PP&E>                                           8,631
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,379
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,797
<BONDS>                                          5,345
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,893
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,133
<SALES>                                            273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   561
<CGS>                                              592
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,777
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,588
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 337
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,719)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,719)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,719)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.67)


</TABLE>
From: Kadijaj@itsa.ucsf.edu [mailto:Kadijaj@itsa.ucsf.edu] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:38 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kadija Johnston 

735 Ramona Ave 

Albany, CA 94706
From: jeanetteg1954-business@yahoo.com [mailto:jeanetteg1954-

business@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:55 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jeanette Giles 

20417 Wyandotte Street 

Winnetka, CA 91306
-----Original Message----- 

From: ceemymtn@yahoo.com [mailto:ceemymtn@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 5:35 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Constancia P. Bonak 

78 Saco Rd., Apt. 1 

Alfred, ME 04002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0497 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. RICHARD SORIA,

Defendant and Appellant,

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time until September 20, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 30 2021

07/30/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0497
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Space nutrition[electronic resource].**** 
SuDoc:NAS 1.102:
ItemNumber:0830-C-23(online)
CGPsystem Number:000582353
 
Volume6
 
Volume  5
Issue 1
 
Issue 2
 
Issue 3
 
Issue 5
 
 
Volume  6
Issue 1
 
Issue 2
 
Issue 3
 
Issue 4
 
Issue 5
 **
§ 220.51 Radio communications and signal indications. ( a ) No information may be given by radio to a train or engine crew about the position or aspect displayed by a fixed signal. However, a radio may be used by a train crew member to communicate information about the position or aspect displayed by a fixed signal to other members of the same crew.
( b ) Except as provided in the railroad's operating rules, radio communication shall not be used to convey instructions which would have the effect of overriding the indication of a fixed signal.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 1 49

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
#### § 209.215 Time limitation.

A proceeding for the issuance of a compliance order under the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970, as amended, shall be completed within twelve (12) months after issuance of the notice of investigation.
#### § 236.202 Signal governing movements over hand-operated switch.

Signal governing movements over hand-operated switch in the facing direction shall display its most restrictive aspect when the points are open one-fourth inch or more and, in the trailing direction, three-eighths inch or more, except that where a separate aspect is displayed for facing movements over the switch in the normal and in the reverse position, the signal shall display its most restrictive aspect when the switch points are open one-fourth inch or more from either the normal or reverse position.