alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000019731
<NAME> CHESAPEAKE CORP /VA/
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       9,800,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              153,900,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,700,000
<INVENTORY>                                134,400,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           325,800,000
<PP&E>                                   1,619,800,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             756,300,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,290,200,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      166,800,000
<BONDS>                                    499,400,000
<COMMON>                                    23,400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 445,700,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,290,200,000
<SALES>                                  1,158,600,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,172,000,000
<CGS>                                      843,000,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,084,300,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,200,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               500,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          33,900,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             47,100,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                17,000,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         30,100,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                30,100,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.27
        

</TABLE>
|EXHIBIT 23.1

Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors of
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation:

We consent to the use of our report dated February 12, 2007 included herein with respect to the balance sheets of Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the related statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006 appearing in the December 31, 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Burlington, Vermont
March 29, 2007
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 27, 1995 (121), Para 121.29 Waiving Points of Order Against Conference Report on H.R.1977]
[Page 1458]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.121.29  waiving points of order against conference report on 
          h.r.1977

  Ms. PRYCE, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. No. 
104-264) the resolution (H. Res. 231) waiving certain points of order 
during consideration of the conference report to the bill (H.R. 1977) 
making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and related 
agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other 
purposes.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6601

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHNNY CASTELLO JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-92-30, CA-93-400-3-P)

Submitted: August 20, 1996 Decided: October 15, 1996

Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Castello Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. United States, Nos.

CR-92-30, CA-93-400-3-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 22, 1995). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 230.55 Tubular type water and lubricator glasses and shields. ( a ) *Water glasses.* Tubular type water glasses shall be renewed at each 92 service day inspection.
( b ) *Shields.* All tubular water glasses and lubricator glasses must be equipped with a safe and suitable shield which will prevent the glass from flying in case of breakage. This shield shall be properly maintained.
( c ) *Location and maintenance.* Water glasses and water glass shields shall be so located, constructed, and maintained that the engine crew can at all times have an unobstructed view of the water in the glass from their proper positions in the cab.
----

|  EXHIBIT 23.2 Consent      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The      Board of DirectorsVermont      Electric Power Company, Inc.: We      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement      (Nos. 333-141681 and 333-151019) on Form S-3 and the      registration statement (Nos. 333-102008 and 333-152872) on      Form S-8 of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation of our report      dated March 3, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets      of Vermont Electric Power Company, Inc. and subsidiary as of      December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements      of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in      the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, which report appears      in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Central      Vermont Public Service Corporation. /s/      KPMG LLP  Burlington,      VermontMarch 10,      2009   Vt.      Reg. No. 92-0000241 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6046** 

MAHMOUD A. BENSTONE , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. ROY W. CHERRY, Superintendent , Defendant

– Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Ea stern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 00313

- JCC

- JFA )

Submitted : April 2 1 , 2011 Decided: April 27, 2011

Before WILKINSON , GREGORY, and D UNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per c uriam opinion

.

Mahmoud A. Benstone, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Mahmoud A. Benstone appeals the district court ’ s order awarding summary judgment to Roy W. Cherry in this 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2006) action

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Benstone v. Cherry , No. 1:10

- cv - 00313

-
JCC

- JFA (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 22, 2010 & entered Dec. 23, 2010)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
-----Original Message----- 

From: r1il@sbcglobal.net [mailto:r1il@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:33 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Roger Hannah 

268 West Country Walk Drive 

Round Lake Beach, IL 60073
March 23, 2015

Darrell Hamm

HouseLens

720 Rundle Avenue

Nashville, TN 37210

Dear Mr. Hamm:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your January 28, 2015 exemption request on behalf of HouseLens, Inc. into the 

public docket (No. FAA-2015-0227), but we are unable to process your request any further. 

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). 

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9521.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
-----Original Message----- 

From: lindamorn@gmail.com [mailto:lindamorn@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 8:06 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

My husband and I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance 

companies from charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-ofpocket expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other 

physical health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Linda Morn 

43339 SE 77th St 

Snoqualmie, WA 98065
-----Original Message----- 

From: britarm@hotmail.com [mailto:britarm@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:55 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 30, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Brita Mjos 

1725 E 24th Ave. 

Anchorage, AK 99508
§ 22.45 Allowable fees to borrowers. ( a ) *Application Fees.* The Participating Lender may charge the applicant a non-refundable loan application fee, as determined from time to time by DOT OSDBU, for each STLP loan application processed, whether a new loan request or a renewal request.
( b ) *Reasonable Closing Expenses.* Provided the Participating Lender charges similar fees to its non-STLP borrowers, the Participating Lender may collect reasonable closing expenses from the borrower, provided that full disclosure of such fees is made to the borrower prior to the loan closing date. These expenses include necessary out-of-pocket expenses to third parties such as filing and recordation fees, as well as loan closing document preparation fees.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ARMANDO GARCIA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-3145

[April 11, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Howard K. Coates, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2021-CF002695-AXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, October 12, 1995 (127), Para 127.12 Subpoena]
[Page 1511]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.127.12  subpoena

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaTOURETTE, laid before the House a 
communication, which was read as follows:

                                    Congress of the United States,

                                     House of Representatives,

                                 Washington, DC, October 10, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     Speaker of the House,
     The Capitol, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Speaker: This is to formally notify you pursuant 
     to Rule L of the Rules of the House that my office has been 
     served with a subpoena issued by the District Court of 
     Tarrant County, Texas.
       After consultation with the General Counsel, I have 
     determined that compliance with the subpoena is not 
     inconsistent with the privileges and precedents of the House.
           Sincerely,
                                                     Martin Frost,
                                               Member of Congress.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 21, 2015

Order 

July 21, 2015

151717(36)

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CITY OF

PONTIAC POLICE AND FIRE RETIREE

PREFUNDED GROUP HEALTH &

INSURANCE TRUST,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

CITY OF PONTIAC,

Defendant-Appellant.

SC: 151717

COA: 316418

Oakland CC: 2012-128625-CZ

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time to 

file its answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer submitted 

on July 14, 2015, is accepted for filing.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00238

- CV

PREMIEANT INCORPORATED d/b/a Premieant,

Appellant

v.

Constance SNOWDEN , as next Friend and Legal Guardian of

Annette Snowden, an Incapacitated Person,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI14231

Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the t rial court’s order is AFFIRMED

and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

It is ORDERED that appellant shall reimburse appellee for her costs of appeal.

SIGNED March 11, 2020.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 24
                                                                      ----------

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:  That each of the undersigned directors
and the undersigned Director/Officer of The Premcor Refining Group Inc., a
Delaware corporation ("PRG"), hereby constitutes and appoints William C. Rusnack
and Jeffry N. Quinn, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full power to act without the others, to sign PRG's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission under the provisions of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; to file such Annual Report and the exhibits
thereto and any and all other documents in connection therewith, including
without limitation amendments thereto, with the Securities and Exchange
commission; and to do and perform any and all other acts and things requisite
and necessary to be done in connection with the foregoing as fully as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-
in-fact and agents, or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

Dated:  March 29, 2001

                           Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating
/s/ William C. Rusnack     Officer, President and Director
----------------------
William C. Rusnack


/s/ Marshall A. Cohen      Director
---------------------
Marshall A. Cohen


/s/ Richard C. Lappin      Director
---------------------
Richard C. Lappin


/s/ David I. Foley         Director
------------------
David I. Foley


/s/ Robert L. Friedman     Director
----------------------
Robert L. Friedman
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 17, 1995 (129), Para 129.14 Digital Sound Recordings]
[Page 1530]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.129.14  digital sound recordings

  Mr. MOORHEAD moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 1506) 
to amend title 17, United States Code, to provide an exclusive right to 
perform sound recordings publicly by means of digital transmissions, and 
for other purposes; as amended.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. RIGGS, recognized Mr. MOORHEAD and Mrs. 
SCHROEDER, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill, as amended?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. RIGGS, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said bill, as amended, was passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said bill was passed was, by 
unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  On motion of Mr. MOORHEAD, by unanimous consent, the bill of the 
Senate (S. 227) amend title 17, United States Code, to provide an 
exclusive right to perform sound recordings publicly by means of digital 
transmissions, and for other purposes; was taken from the Speaker's 
table.
  When said bill was considered, read twice, ordered to be read a third 
time, was read a third time by title, and passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said bill was passed was, by 
unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate thereof.
```
#### Achille J. Oishei, Appellant, *v.*Pietrina D’Ancona, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Pietro D’Ancona, Defendant, and Borden’s Condensed Milk Company, Respondent.

(Submitted November 14, 1910;

decided November 22, 1910.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 199 N. Y. 588.)
# EUR-Lex - 52003XC0828(04) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52003XC0828(04)

**Amendment by France of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services within France (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal C 203 , 28/08/2003 P. 0005 - 0005 *

Amendment by France of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services within France

(2003/C 203/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

1. France has decided to alter the public service obligation in respect of scheduled air services between Saint-Étienne-Bouthéon and Nantes-Atlantique, published in the Official Journal of the European Communities C 127 of 24 April 1997 and amended in the Official Journal of the European Communities C 30 of 2 February 2000, pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes.

2. The new public service obligation is as follows:

Minimum frequency

The minimum level of service provided must be one return trip per day, from Monday to Friday, excluding public holidays and holiday periods, 220 days a year.

The services must be non-stop between Saint-Étienne-Bouthéon and Nantes-Atlantique.

Type of aircraft used and capacity provided

The service must be operated with a pressurised aircraft having a seating capacity of at least nineteen.

Timetables

The services must be provided between 7.00 and 19.00.

Commercial policy

Seats on these flights must be marketed by at least one computerised booking system.

Continuity of service

Except in cases of force majeure, the number of flights cancelled for reasons directly attributable to the carrier must not exceed 3 % of the number of flights scheduled in any year. In addition, the carrier must give six months' notice before discontinuing the services.

Community carriers are hereby informed that the operation of air services without regard to the abovementioned public service obligation may result in administrative and/or criminal penalties.

3. These public service obligations replace those set out in the Commission notice published in the Official Journal of the European Communities C 127 of 24 April 1997 and amended in the Official Journal of the European Communities C 30 of 2 February 2000.
#### § 176.120 Lightning protection.

A lightning conductor grounded to the sea must be provided on any mast or similar structure on a vessel on which Class 1 (explosive) materials are stowed unless effective electrical bonding is provided between the sea and the mast or structure from its extremity and throughout to the main body of the hull structure. (Steel masts in ships of all welded construction comply with this requirement).