alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2262 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2262

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 19, 1995

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States Post Office building located at 218 
   North Alston Street in Foley, Alabama, as the ``Holk Post Office 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 218 North Alston 
Street in Foley, Alabama, shall be known and designated as the ``Holk 
Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Post Office building 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Holk Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 19, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Linda Nave,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 OMEGA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 9, 2007
    /s/ Daniel L. WarfelDaniel L. WarfelChief Financial Officer  Page 38
§ 229.301 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The purpose of this subpart is to promote the safe design, operation, and maintenance of safety-critical, as defined in § 229.305, electronic locomotive control systems, subsystems, and components.
( b ) Locomotive control systems or their functions that comingle with safety critical processor based signal and train control systems are regulated under part 236 subparts H and I of this chapter.
-----Original Message----- 

From: ptrani@comcast.net [mailto:ptrani@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:34 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Patricia Trani 

17 Edward Dr 

East Windsor, NJ 08520
-----Original Message----- 

From: dr_edethomsen@yahoo.com [mailto:dr_edethomsen@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:19 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Edith Thomsen 

401 43rd Ave 

San Francisco, CA 94121
-----Original Message----- 

From: rubysun27@aol.com [mailto:rubysun27@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:39 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

constance agostini 

62 bonn plaCE 

WEEHAWKEN, NJ 07086
-----Original Message----- 

From: KHOOVER@WVU.EDU [mailto:KHOOVER@WVU.EDU] 

Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 2:40 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 03, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kathleen Hoover 

82 Buckingham Road 

Morgantown, WV 26508
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      62,400,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              127,600,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,100,000
<INVENTORY>                                102,700,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           313,400,000
<PP&E>                                     872,400,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             385,900,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             979,400,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      155,600,000
<BONDS>                                    270,400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,400,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 421,900,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               979,400,000
<SALES>                                    950,400,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           950,400,000
<CGS>                                      732,800,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              886,800,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               700,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          18,900,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             55,800,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                21,800,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         34,000,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                   13,300,000
<NET-INCOME>                                47,300,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.19


</TABLE>
cc (sent via email): Lisa Feldt, Acting De puty Administrator, EPA Ken Kopocis, Acting Assistant Admi nistrator, Office of Water, EPA Jane Nishida, Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of International & Tribal Affairs, EPA Dennis McLerran, Administrator, EPA Jim Woods, Tribal Liaison, EPA
#### Genesee Valley Milk Products Company, Plaintiff, *v.*J. H. Jones Corporation, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, Monroe Trial Term,

October, 1910.)

Contracts — 'Validity of contracts — Effect of invalidity or illegality — Enforcement of illegal contracts in general.

JSTo action lies to recover the purchase price of condensed riiilk ordered to be made of a mixture of skimmed milk and milk from •which cream has not been removed.

Action for goods sold and delivered.

Geo. A. Carnahan and H. C. Nobles, for plaintiff.

Paul M. Pelletreau, for defendant.

Sutherland, J.

The defendant ordered, - and the plaintiff sold and delivered to it within the State of New York, quantities of condensed, milk made of a mixture of pure milk and milk that had been skimmed, the proportion being either one to one or one to two. But the manufacture or sale of condensed milk made from milk from which the cream has been wholly or in part removed is positively forbidden by section 37 of the Agricultural Law, and the plaintiff must fail in this action brought to recover the purchase price.

The defendant was not deceived; it obtained just what it ordered, and has turned about and sold this very product to *237its own customers. The statute is absolute in terms, however, and the court has no alternative hut to refuse to enforce a contract which the law prohibits. Page Gout-., § 519.

Judgment is accordingly ordered for the defendant.
§ 219.1007 Alternate programs. ( a ) Instead of the referral programs required under § 219.1001, a railroad is permitted to develop, publish, and implement alternate programs that meet the standards established in § 219.1001. Such programs must have the written concurrence of the recognized representatives of the regulated employees. Nothing in this subpart restricts a railroad or labor organization from adopting, publishing, and implementing programs that afford more favorable conditions to regulated employees troubled by drug or alcohol abuse problems, consistent with a railroad's responsibility to prevent violations of §§ 219.101, 219.102, and 219.103.
( b ) The concurrence of the recognized representatives of the regulated employees in an alternate program may be evidenced by a collective bargaining agreement or any other document describing the class or craft of employees to which the alternate program applies. The agreement or other document must make express reference to this subpart and to the intention of the railroad and employee representatives that the alternate program applies instead of the program required by this subpart.
( c ) The railroad must file the agreement or other document described in paragraph (b) of this section along with the requested alternate program it submits for approval with the FRA Drug and Alcohol Program Manager. FRA will base its approval on whether the alternative program meets the § 219.1001 objectives. The alternative program does not have to include each § 219.1001 component, but must meet the general standards and intent of § 219.1001. If a railroad amends or revokes an approved alternate policy, the railroad must file a notice with FRA of such amendment or revocation at least 30 days before the effective date of such action.
( d ) This section does not excuse a railroad from adopting, publishing, and implementing the programs § 219.1001 requires for any group of regulated employees not falling within the coverage of an appropriate, approved alternate program.
( e ) Consistent with § 219.105(c), FRA has the authority to inspect the aggregate data of any railroad alcohol and/or drug use education, prevention, identification, and rehabilitation program or policy, including alternate peer support programs, to ensure that they are not designed or implemented in such a way that they circumvent or otherwise undermine Federal requirements, including the requirements in this part regarding peer support programs.
#### § 209.13 Consolidation.

At the time a matter is set for hearing under subpart B, C, or D of this part, the Chief Counsel may consolidate the matter with any similar matter(s) pending against the same respondent or with any related matter(s) pending against other respondent(s) under the same subpart. However, on certification by the presiding officer that a consolidated proceeding is unmanageable or otherwise undesirable, the Chief Counsel will rescind or modify the consolidation.

[54 FR 42906, Oct. 18, 1989]
§ 177.839 Class 8 (corrosive) materials. (See also § 177.834(a) through (j).) ( a ) *Nitric acid.* No packaging of nitric acid of 50 percent or greater concentration may be loaded above any packaging containing any other kind of material.
( b ) *Storage batteries.* All storage batteries containing any electrolyte must be so loaded, if loaded with other lading, that all such batteries will be protected against other lading falling onto or against them, and adequate means must be provided in all cases for the protection and insulation of battery terminals against short circuits.
[Amdt. 177-87, 61 FR 27175, May 30, 1996]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                          15,706
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,942
<ALLOWANCES>                                       760
<INVENTORY>                                     47,422
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               139,377
<PP&E>                                          73,586
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,588
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 292,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,734
<BONDS>                                        124,182
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,098
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           186
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,329
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   292,076
<SALES>                                        249,870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               249,870
<CGS>                                          164,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  234,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,636
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   130
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,565
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (301)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,370
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,671)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (28,295)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,208)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (34,174)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.85)
        

</TABLE>
[MULTIPLIER] 1
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                              PAB BANKSHARES, INC.
                              --------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                    SEPTEMBER 30,
                                               ------------------------
                                                1999             1998
                                             ----------       ----------
<S>                                         <C>               <C>

Basic Earnings Per Share:
-------------------------
  Average shares outstanding                 8,288,718         8,279,090
                                            ==========        ==========

Diluted Earnings Per Share:
---------------------------
  Average shares outstanding                 8,288,718         8,279,090
                                            ----------        ----------
  Average options outstanding:
    With exercise price of $6.250              128,000           144,000
    With exercise price of $6.670                7,353             7,353
    With exercise price of $10.063             131,250           131,500
    With exercise price of $12.063              45,000            46,500
    With exercise price of $14.000              10,000            10,000
                                            ----------        ----------
  Proceeds from assumed exercise of options
    outstanding                             $2,852,648         2,973,259
  Average market price per share during
    the period                              $    15.85             15.10
                                            ----------        ----------

  Assumed shares repurchased                   179,973           196,938
                                            ----------        ----------

  Common stock equivalents of options
    outstanding                                141,630           142,415
                                            ----------        ----------

  Average shares outstanding                 8,430,348         8,421,505
                                            ==========        ==========

Earnings Per Share:
-------------------
  Net Income                                $5,413,958         5,080,700
                                            ==========        ==========

  Basic Earnings Per Share                  $      .65               .61
                                            ==========        ==========

  Diluted Earnings Per Share                $      .64               .60
                                            ==========        ==========

</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: mgfollis@chartermi.net [mailto:mgfollis@chartermi.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 9:41 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

When are lawmakers going to realize they have the job of representing 

their constituents, which may include but certainly is not limited to 

business owners! 

Sincerely, 

Mary Follis 

5555 North 6th Street 

Kalamazoo, MI 49009
##### 



Exhibit (32)(a) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Compass Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, D.
Paul Jones, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  (1)
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ D. Paul Jones, Jr.     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Compass Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Compass
Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
-----Original Message----- 

From: dmstewart@gmail.com [mailto:dmstewart@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:42 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

David Stewart 

7108 W Arbor Trace Dr #502 

Knoxville, TN 37909
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 1 001 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 -NM - 020 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR - M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
#### Charles E. Berger, *Appellant, v.*The New York and Harlem Railroad Company, *Respondent.*

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*