alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: JCLD2@hotmail.com [mailto:JCLD2@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:22 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

John Cloud 

PO Box 386 

East Haddam, CT 06423
###### Editorial Note on Part 193

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

#### § 193.2709 Security.

Personnel having security duties must be qualified to perform their assigned duties by successful completion of the training required under § 193.2715.
-----Original Message----- 

From: zcanoe@gmail.com [mailto:zcanoe@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 12:14 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Shannon Bartow 

520 Lindley Lane 

Eugene, OR 97401
```

[112th Congress Public Law 244]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 2383]]

Public Law 112-244
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to allow the storage and 
 conveyance of nonproject water at the Norman project in Oklahoma, and 
       for other purposes. <<NOTE: Jan. 10, 2013 -  [H.R. 3263]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Lake Thunderbird 
Efficient Use Act of 2012.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lake Thunderbird Efficient Use Act of 
2012''.
SEC. 2. NORMAN PROJECT, OKLAHOMA.

    Public Law 86-529 (74 Stat. 225) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
``SEC. 10. LAKE THUNDERBIRD.

    ``(a) In General.--If the Secretary of the Interior determines that 
there is enough excess capacity in the reservoir on the Little River 
known as `Lake Thunderbird' that nonproject water can be stored in Lake 
Thunderbird, the Secretary of the Interior may, in accordance with the 
reclamation laws, amend an existing contract, or enter into 1 or more 
new contracts, with the Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy District for 
the storage and conveyance of nonproject water in Norman project 
facilities to augment municipal and industrial supplies for the cities 
served by the Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy District.
    ``(b) Costs.--If any additional infrastructure is needed to enable 
the storage and conveyance of non-project water in Norman project 
facilities under subsection (a) or any other provision of this Act, the 
costs of constructing, operating, and maintaining the infrastructure 
shall be the responsibility of the non-Federal entity contracting with 
the Secretary of the Interior for storage and conveyance rights.''.

[[Page 126 STAT. 2384]]

SEC. 3. EFFECT.

    Nothing in this Act or an amendment made by this Act authorizes any 
expansion of the storage capacity of Lake Thunderbird.

    Approved January 10, 2013.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3263 (S. 802):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112-442 (Comm. on Natural Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 112-117 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources)      

accompanying S. 802.
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            June 5, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 30, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: jwalsh17@comcast.net [mailto:jwalsh17@comcast.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 6:40 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

julie walsh 

19 Willow St 

Waltham, MA 02453
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000703702
<NAME> Meridian Point Realty Trust '83 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         588,204
<SECURITIES>                                 1,491,025
<RECEIVABLES>                                  167,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (25,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,871,665
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,221,665
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,488
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,031,618
<OTHER-SE>                                   (913,441)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,221,665
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,008
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  758,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (687,158)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (687,158)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (687,158)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 221

To amend title 18, United States Code, to regulate the manufacture,

importation, and sale of polymer plastic ammunition.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. DEUTSCH (for himself, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. MEEHAN, and Mr. PALLONE)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to regulate the

manufacture, importation, and sale of polymer plastic

ammunition.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Law Enforcement Offi5 cials Protection Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 221 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF ARMOR PIERCING AMMUNITION EX2 PANDED TO INCLUDE POLYMER PLASTIC AM3 MUNITION.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 921(a)(17)(B) of title 18,

5 United States Code, is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (i);

7 and

8 (2) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii)

9 and inserting after clause (i) the following:

10 ‘‘(ii) a projectile or projectile core which may be

11 used in a firearm and which is constructed entirely

12 (excluding the presence of traces of other sub13 stances) from polymer plastic; or’’.

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

15 subsection (a) shall apply to conduct engaged in after the

16 30-day period that begins with the date of the enactment

17 of this Act.

Æ
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 8, 1995 (112), Para 112.10 Interior Appropriations]
[Page 1321]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.112.10  interior appropriations

  On motion of Mr. REGULA, by unanimous consent, the bill (H.R. 1977) 
making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and related 
agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other 
purposes; together with the amendments of the Senate thereto, was taken 
from the Speaker's table.
  When on motion of Mr. REGULA, it was,
  Resolved, That the House disagree to the amendments of the Senate and 
agree to the conference asked by the Senate on the disagreeing votes of 
the two Houses thereon.
```
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


     The Registrant, Champion Industries, Inc., a West Virginia corporation,
does business under the trade name "Chapman Printing Company".  Its wholly owned
subsidiaries are:

1.   The Chapman Printing Company, Inc., a West Virginia corporation.

2.   Stationers, Inc., a West Virginia corporation (doing business in Ohio as
     "Garrison Brewer").

3.   Bourque Printing, Inc., a Louisiana corporation.

4.   Dallas Printing Company, Inc., a Mississippi corporation.

5.   Carolina Cut Sheets, Inc., a West Virginia corporation.

6.   U.S. Tag & Ticket Company, Inc., a Maryland corporation.

7.   Donihe Graphics, Inc., a Tennessee corporation.

8.   Smith & Butterfield Co., Inc., an Indiana corporation.

9.   The Merten Company, an Ohio corporation.

10.  Interform Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00345

- CR

M IGUEL D WAYNE H OBDY

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 213th District Court

of Tarrant Coun ty (1496597D)

August 8, 2019

Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is af firmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
-----Original Message----- 

From: krussell33@aol.com [mailto:krussell33@aol.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:57 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Karen Russell 

5702 Blackhawk Forest Dr. 

Westerville, OH 43082
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-163-CV

Q'SO, INC., AMY ARNOLDT, AND APPELLANTS

FREDRICK ARNOLDT

V.

CAPITAL ONE, N.A. APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 342ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellants’ Motion To Dismiss.” It is the court’s

opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for

which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, LIVINGSTON, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: June 18, 2009
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RAY GUTIERREZ,

 Appellant,

v.

243RD DISTRICT COURT,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00093-CV

Appeal from

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 20140D04007)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore 

dismiss the appeal. We further order Appellant to pay all costs of this appeal. We further order 

that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2016.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
-----Original Message----- 

From: redbar@net1plus.com [mailto:redbar@net1plus.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:14 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Nancy McRae 

9 Groton St 

Pepperell, MA 01463
California 

What We Do 

Visit Us 

Information Center 

Get Involved 

Field Offices 

Contact Us 

Search BLM Go

BLM>California>What We Do>Recreation>OHV

Off-Highway Vehicle Areas 

Numerous opportunities for off-highway vehicle recreation exist on 

California. Miles of trails and open areas await all types of OHV enth

OHV Areas: The links below will take you to Web sites maintained b

Offices. 

z Chappie-Shasta OHV Area; Shasta County 

z Cow Mountain Recreation Area; Lake and Mendocino Countie

z Clear Creek Management Area, San Benito and Fresno Count

z Dove Springs; Kern County 

z Dumont Dunes; San Bernardino County 

z El Mirage; San Bernardino County 

z Fort Sage; Lassen County 

z Jawbone Canyon; Kern County 

z Johnson Valley; San Bernardino County 

z Imperial and San Diego County OHV sites

z Knoxville; Lake and Napa Counties 

z Rasor; San Bernardino County 

z Samoa Dunes; Humboldt County 

z Spangler Hills; Kern County 

z Stoddard Valley; San Bernardino County 

Helpful Web Sites: 

z Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation (OHMVR) - Division of

Road to Big Trouble

Watch the latest Funny.bytes -- and see why you should 

"stay on the roads."

Funny.bytes is an occasional look at the lighter side of BLM 

issues. 

Last updated: 04-10-2009

USA.GOV | No Fear Act | DOI | Disclaimer | About BLM | Notices | Get Adob

Privacy Policy | FOIA | Kids Policy | Contact Us | Accessibility | Site Map

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

 

BLM OHV - Off-Highway Vehicle Areas, Bureau of Land Management California Page 1 of 1

http://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/prog/recreation/ohv.html 2/8/2010
§ 224.103 Characteristics of retroreflective sheeting. ( a ) *Construction.* Retroreflective sheeting applied pursuant to this part shall consist of a smooth, flat, transparent exterior film with microprismatic retroreflective elements embedded in or suspended beneath the film so as to form a non-exposed retroreflective optical system.
( b ) *Color.* Retroreflective sheeting applied pursuant to this part shall be yellow, fluorescent yellow, or white as specified by the chromaticity coordinates of ASTM International's Standard D 4956-04, “Standard Specification for Retroreflective Sheeting for Traffic Control.” The Director of the Federal Register approves the incorporation by reference of this standard in this section in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain a copy of the incorporated standard from ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959 or at *http://www.astm.org .* You may inspect a copy of the incorporated standard at the Federal Railroad Administration, Docket Clerk, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) *Performance.* Retroreflective sheeting applied pursuant to this part shall meet the requirements of ASTM D 4956-04, for Type V Sheeting if metalized or Type VII Sheeting if non-metalized, except for the initial minimum values of the coefficient of retroreflection, and shall, as initially applied, meet the minimum values for the coefficient of retroreflection specified in Table 1 of this subpart.
[70 FR 62176, Oct. 28, 2005, as amended at 74 FR 25173, May 27, 2009]
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3874

_____________________________

GLENDA PAUL,

Appellant,

v.

PUBLIX and PUBLIX RISK 

MANAGEMENT,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

Stephen L. Rosen, Judge.

July 2, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and MAKAR and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

E. Taylor Davidson of DDB Law, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellant.

Kevin E. Leisure of Kevin E. Leisure, P.A., Lakeland, for 

Appellees.
-----Original Message----- 

From: law116@pitt.edu [mailto:law116@pitt.edu] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 8:49 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kimberly Wolff 

1874 George Circle 

North Huntingdon, PA 15642
§ 225.18 Alcohol or drug involvement. ( a ) In preparing Form FRA F 6180.54, “Rail Equipment Accident/Incident Report,” under this part, the railroad shall make such specific inquiry as may be reasonable under the circumstances into the possible involvement of alcohol or drug use or impairment in such accident or incident. If the railroad comes into possession of any information whatsoever, whether or not confirmed, concerning alleged alcohol or drug use or impairment by an employee who was involved in, or arguably could be said to have been involved in, the accident/incident, the railroad shall report such alleged use or impairment as provided in the current FRA Guide. If the railroad is in possession of such information but does not believe that alcohol or drug impairment was the primary or contributing cause of the accident/incident, then the railroad shall include in the narrative statement of such report a brief explanation of the basis of such determination.
( b ) For any train accident within the requirement for post-accident testing under § 219.201 of this chapter, the railroad shall append to the Form FRA F 6180.54, “Rail Equipment Accident/Incident Report,” any report required by 49 CFR 219.209(b) (pertaining to failure to obtain samples for post-accident toxicological testing).
( c ) For any train or non-train incident, the railroad shall provide any available information concerning the possible involvement of alcohol or drug use or impairment in such accident or incident.
( d ) In providing information required by this section, a railroad shall not disclose any information concerning use of controlled substances determined by the railroad's Medical Review Officer to have been consistent with 49 CFR 219.103.
[75 FR 68906, Nov. 9, 2010]
§ 221.15 Marking device inspection. ( a ) Each marking device displayed in compliance with this part shall be examined at each crew change point to assure that the device is in proper operating condition.
( b ) This examination shall be accomplished either by visually observing that the device is functioning as required or that the device will function when required by either: ( 1 ) Repositioning the activation switch or
( 2 ) Covering the photoelectric cell.
( c ) This examination shall be conducted either by the train crew or some other qualified person, *Provided that,* if a non-train crewmember performs the examination, that person shall communicate his or her findings to the locomotive engineer of the new train crew.
( d ) When equipped with a radio telemetry capability, a marker displayed in accordance with this part may be examined by observing the readout information displayed in the cab of the controlling locomotive demonstrating that the light is functioning as required in lieu of conducting a visual observation.
[51 FR 25185, July 10, 1986]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1705
JOSETTE M. MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HECTOR BARRETO, Administrator; U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION; CHARLES GASTON; BETTY VERSER; JIMMIE ANDERSON; THOMAS TOLAN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-735) Submitted: February 28, 2005 Decided: March 17, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Belva D. Newsome, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Robert P. McIntosh, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Josette M. Mills appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action arising under the Rehabilitation Act and denying Mills’ motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and briefs and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeMills v. Barreto , No. CA-03-735 (E.D. Va. Mar. 8, 2004, and Apr. 6, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Appeal Reinstated and Order filed September 8, 2022

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 21

- 00719

- CV

____________ BUG STATE PEST CONTROL, INC. , Appellant

V.
ACCUTROL EXTERMINATING & MOSQUITO SYSTEMS, LLC; ACCUTROL PEST MANAGEMENT , LLC; AND BRYAN

ZENTK OVICH , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015

- 51567



### ORDER
This appeal was abated by order of May 17, 2022 until July 18
, 2 0 22 , for
final i zation of settlement documents. As of this date, no dispositive motion or motion to extend the abatement has been filed . Accordingly, the appeal is reinstated, and appellant ’ s brief is due thirty (3 0) days from the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Spain, Poissant a nd Wilson.