46520 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 160 / Monday, August 20, 2007 / Notices 

impact their interests. The Judges seek 

comment on what action, if any, the 

Judges should take to remedy this issue. 

For example, would posting all 

incoming filings or a notice that a filing 

has been made in a matter on the CRB 

Web site be sufficient notice to potential 

claimants and other interested persons 

in those instances prior to 

commencement of a proceeding? In the 

alternative, the Judges could adopt a 

rule requiring service of process prior to 

the commencement of a proceeding. If 

the Judges adopted such a rule, what 

sort of service should be required and to 

whom? 

For full consideration, comments 

should be received by September 19, 

2007. 

Dated: August 14, 2007. 

James Scott Sledge, 

Chief Copyright Royalty Judge. 

[FR Doc. E7–16267 Filed 8–17–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1410–72–P 

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

RIN Z–RIN 3145–ZA02 

Proposed Addition of a Routine Use to 

NSF Systems of Records 

Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3101 and 42 U.S.C. 

1870; OMB Memorandum M–07–16, 

‘‘Safeguarding Against and Responding to the 

Breach of Personally Identifiable 

Information.’’

ACTION: Notice of alteration to existing 

Privacy Act systems of records. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, 

as amended, the National Science 

Foundation is altering its existing 

systems of records in accordance with 

OMB Memorandum M–07–16, 

‘‘Safeguarding Against and Responding 

to the Breach of Personally Identifiable 

Information.’’ M–07–16 calls on 

agencies to publish a routine use for 

appropriate systems specifically 

applying to the disclosure of 

information in connection with 

response and remedial efforts in the 

event of a data breach. 

A Federal agency’s ability to respond 

quickly and effectively in the event of 

a breach of Federal data is critical to its 

efforts to prevent or minimize any 

consequent harm. An effective response 

may necessitate disclosure of 

information regarding the breach to 

those individuals affected by it, as well 

as to persons and entities in a position 

to cooperate, either by assisting in 

notification to affected individuals or 

playing a role in preventing or 

minimizing harms from the breach. 

The information to be disclosed to 

such persons and entities may be 

subject to the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 

552a. The Privacy Act prohibits the 

disclosure of any record in a system of 

records absent the written consent of the 

subject individual, unless the disclosure 

falls within one of the twelve statutory 

exceptions, including a routine use, 5 

U.S.C. 552a(b)(3). 

As described in the President’s 

Identity Theft Task Force’s Strategic 

Plan, all agencies should publish a 

routine use for their systems of records 

allowing for the disclosure of 

information in the course of responding 

to a breach of Federal data. See 

Appendix B of the Identity Theft Task 

Force report (http://www.identity 

theft.gov/reports/StrategicPlan.pdf). 

Such a routine use will serve to protect 

the interests of the individuals whose 

information is at issue by allowing 

agencies to take appropriate steps to 

facilitate a timely and effective 

response, thereby improving their 

ability to prevent, minimize, or remedy 

any harm resulting from a compromise 

of data maintained in their systems of 

records. 

Accordingly, NSF proposes to add the 

following routine use to each of its 

Systems of Records Notices listed 

below: 

To appropriate agencies, entities, and 

persons when (1) the NSF suspects or has 

confirmed that the security or confidentiality 

of information in the system of records has 

been compromised; (2) the NSF has 

determined that as a result of the suspected 

or confirmed compromise there is a risk of 

harm to economic or property interests, 

identity theft or fraud, or harm to the security 

or integrity of this system or other systems 

or programs (whether maintained by the NSF 

or another agency or entity) that rely upon 

the compromised information; and (3) the 

disclosure made to such agencies, entities, 

and persons is reasonably necessary to assist 

in connection with the NSF’s efforts to 

respond to the suspected or confirmed 

compromise and prevent, minimize, or 

remedy such harm. 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

August 30, 2007. The proposed altered 

systems will become effective on 

September 30, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Leslie 

Jensen, National Science Foundation, 

Office of the General Counsel, Room 

1265, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 

Arlington, Virginia 22230 or by 

electronic mail (e-mail) to: 

ljensen@nsf.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

publication is in accordance with the 

Privacy Act requirement that agencies 

publish their amended systems of 

records in the Federal Register when 

there is a revision, change, or addition. 

NSF’s Office of the General Counsel 

(OGC) has reviewed its Systems of 

Records notice and has determined that 

its records systems notices must be 

revised to incorporate the change 

described herein. As required by 5 

U.S.C. 552a(R) and Appendix I to OMB 

Circular A–130, ‘‘Federal Agency 

Responsibilities for Maintaining 

Records about Individuals,’’ dated 

November 30, 2000, a report of an 

altered system of records has been 

submitted to the Committee on 

Government Reform of the House of 

Representatives, the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs of the Senate, and the Office of 

Management and Budget. 

Submit comments as an ASCII file 

avoiding the use of special characters 

and any form of encryption. Identify all 

comments sent in electronic E-mail with 

Subject Line: Comments on proposed 

changes to Privacy Act SORNs. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Leslie Jensen (703) 292–5065. 

Dated: August 14, 2007. 

Lawrence Rudolph, 

General Counsel. 

System Names: 

NSF–3 Application and Account for 

Advance of Funds 

NSF–6 Doctorate Records File 

NSF–8 Employee Grievance Files 

NSF–10 Employee’s Payroll Jacket 

NSF–12 Fellowships and Other 

Awards 

NSF–13 Fellowship Payroll 

NSF–16 Individual Retirement Record 

(SF–2806) 

NSF–18 Integrated Personnel System 

(IPERS) 

NSF–19 Medical Examination Records 

for Service in the Polar Regions 

NSF–22 NSF Payroll System 

NSF–23 NSF Staff Biography 

NSF–24 Official Passports 

NSF–26 Personnel Security 

NSF–34 Integrated Time and 

Attendance System (ITAS) 

NSF–36 Personnel Tracking System 

(Antarctic) 

NSF–38 Visa Applications and Alien 

Application for Consideration of 

Waiver of Two-Year Foreign 

Residence Requirements—NSF 

NSF–43 Doctorate Work History File 

NSF–48 Telephone Call Detail 

Program Records 

NSF–49 Frequent Traveler Profile 

NSF–50 Principal Investigator/ 

Proposal File & Associated Records 

NSF–51 Reviewer/Proposal File & 

Associated Records 

NSF–52 Office of Inspector General 

Investigative Files 

NSF–53 Public Transportation 

Subsidy Program 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 160 / Monday, August 20, 2007 / Notices 46521 

NSF–54 Reviewer/Fellowship & Other 

Award File & All Associated Records 

NSF–55 Debarment/Scientific 

Misconduct Files 

NSF–56 Antarctic Conservation Act 

Files 

NSF–57 Delinquent Debtors File 

NSF–59 Science & Technology Centers 

(STC) Database 

NSF–60 Antarctica Service Records 

NSF–61 Diving Safety Records (Polar 

Regions) 

NSF–62 Radiation Safety Records 

(Polar Regions) 

NSF–63 Accident & Injury Reports 

(Antarctic) 

NSF–64 Project Participant File 

NSF–65 NSF Electronic Payment File 

NSF–66 NSF Photo Identification Card 

System 

NSF–67 Invention, Patent & Licensing 

Documents 

NSF–68 Project Results Information 

Database 

NSF–69 Education and Training 

Records Files 

NSF–70 NSF Visitor Credentials 

System 

NSF–71 General Correspondence Files 

[FR Doc. 07–4049 Filed 8–17–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Consideration of Issuance of 

Amendment to Facility Operating 

Licenses, Proposed No Significant 

Hazards Consideration Determination, 

and Opportunity for a Hearing (TAC 

Nos. J60622 and J60626); Plum Brook 

Reactor Facility, Docket Nos. 50–30 

and 50–185, Sandusky, OH 

Dates of amendment requests: May 

18, 2005, May 12, 2006, February 9, 

2007, and January 10, 2007. 

Description of amendment request: 

The licensee (National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration (NASA)) has 

proposed to amend the Facility 

Operating Licenses (TR–3 and R–93) of 

the two research reactors located at 

Plum Brook Reactor Facility, Sandusky, 

Ohio. The amendments to the licenses 

include revisions to the Technical 

Specifications (TS), and incorporating a 

Final Status Survey Plan (Revision 1). 

The same TS set applies equally to both 

licenses. 

The Decommissioning Plan (DP) for 

the Plum Brook Reactor Facility, 

approved by the Commission by 

issuance of license amendment dated 

March 20, 2002, will remained 

unchanged. 

Proposed revisions to the TS include 

but are not limited to administrative 

changes, revised facility descriptions, 

new definitions and minor program 

changes. Specific proposed revisions 

include the following: 

Section 1 of the TS is revised to state 

that the TS apply to all activities 

conducted under the provisions of the 

Licenses. It clarifies that both reactors 

are both shutdown and dismantled, and 

there is no fuel remaining at the facility. 

The facility was shutdown and ceased 

operations in March 1973. The last 

shipment of irradiated fuel was made on 

May 25, 1973, and all remaining fuel 

contaminated components were shipped 

offsite by July 1973. Disposal of the 

Plum Brock reactor vessel was 

completed in early 2005 and the core 

support components for the Mock Up 

reactor were removed by the summer of 

2003. 

The ‘Definitions’ in Section 2 of the 

TS are renumbered to comply with 

ANSI/ANS–15.1 format, and the 

definitions that follow are numbered as 

subparagraphs with the format 1.1.x. 

Some definitions are revised, deleted, or 

redefined. 

Section 2.0 of the TS are revised to 

identify that there are no Safety Limits 

or Limiting Safety System Settings 

applicable to the facility, since all 

reactor components and fuel have been 

removed. 

Sections 3.1 and 4.1 of the TS were 

revised to identify that the Access 

Control Program was changed to more 

accurately reflect the current site 

conditions. 

Sections 3.2 and 4.2 of the TS relating 

to Alarm Response are revised so that 

the Containment Vessel (CV) Door Open 

alarm was removed from this section 

and incorporated into the specifications 

related to ‘Containment’. 

The specifications related to sump 

level alarms are revised to provide 

quantitative criteria on when sump level 

alarms are required rather than the 

subjective criteria of ‘kept dry’. The 

requirement for the sump alarms to 

annunciate at the Plum Brook Station 

Communications Center is also revised 

to require that the alarms annunciate at 

a remote manned location which is 

typically the Plum Brook Station 

Communications Center. 

Sections 3.3 and 3.4 relating to 

Containment and Ventilation and the 

associated Section 4 surveillance 

requirements are revised to reflect that 

the fact the airborne activity must be 

controlled during all decommissioning 

activities rather than only during the 

time period that a ‘major portion of the 

source term is present’. 

Sections 3.5 and 3.6 relating to 

Radiation and Effluent Monitoring and 

the associated Section 4 surveillance 

requirements are revised to reflect the 

current site conditions and to provide 

assurance that a program is 

implemented that assures the worker 

exposure to radiological hazards is 

maintained as low as reasonably 

achievable and in compliance with 10 

CFR Part 20 limits. In addition, they 

assure that effluents from the facility are 

adequately monitored to protect the 

public and environment from 

radiological hazards. 

Sections 5.0 relating to Site Features 

are revised to conform to the format 

suggested in ANSI/ANS–15.1 and to 

more accurately reflect the current site 

conditions that have evolved as the 

decommissioning program has 

progressed. 

Sections 6.0 relating to 

Administrative Controls contain 

multiple revisions. The requirement to 

perform an annual review is relocated to 

section 6.9.2 to incorporate into the 

annual review performed at the 

direction of the Executive Safety Board. 

The requirement to have Level 3 

approval of temporary procedure 

changes is removed since such changes 

are controlled through site established 

administrative procedures; and, the 

responsibilities of the Decommissioning 

Safety Committee are more clearly 

defined. 

The last sentence in Section 6.5 of the 

TS is deleted. 

Section 6.5 of the TS is revised to 

read, ‘‘The Senior Project Engineer will 

have direct authority over all activities 

that take place at the Plum Brook 

Reactor Facility (PBRF) and will be the 

primary interface with on-site 

Contractors supporting the 

Decommissioning project.’’

The last sentence of Section 6.7 of the 

TS is revised to read, ‘‘The authority to 

fulfill this responsibility and perform 

these functions will be granted by 

Chairman of the NASA Safety, Health, 

and Environmental Board.’’

The second sentence in Section 6.9.2 

of the TS is revised to read, ‘‘Personnel 

performing these reviews shall be 

appropriately qualified and 

experienced, and shall be members of, 

or appointed by the NASA Safety, 

Health, and Environmental Board.’’

Figure 1 on page 24 of the Technical 

Specifications is revised to reflect the 

change in the name of the Executive 

Safety Board and to depict the direct 

reporting relationship of the Health 

Physics and Radiation Protection staff to 

the NASA Project Radiation Safety 

Officer. 

Licenses TR–3 and R–93 are also 

revised. The revision numbers 

associated with issuance of this License 

Amendment are inserted in place of 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES