alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-03T03:12:46Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-03T03:12:49Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-03T03:12:49Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="68857">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="2">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-03T03:12:46Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 
</p>
<p>AUSTIN </p>
<p></p>
</div>
<div class="page"><p></p>
<div class="ocr">945

gonoradle Re Py Webber = page &

ing out the pur s of thig Act, provid that
their ¢ "
sGomponsation qhall be paid only cut of the

tration funil?,
In 1941 the Logialature in
_ ¢hon pristed for tho estate Beant of 7 mt eel
~ gneve® a certatn wuse to be « for’ parte tine

" gocretary ani for
; scasonebie help, stenocrayhis and investi«

Tho quoted tion of the ste
the Heard te tute clearly author
inee een atate e ceploy ice Bar Lite Rardin to perform the sarvices

¥ory traly yours
ATTORMY GENSNAL OF TEXAS

Gaver

Gace. ¥. Barons
4scistant

APPROVED

OPINION

COMMITTEE

BY.
CHAIRMAN

</div>

</div>
</body></html>
-----Original Message----- 

From: jwu72687@charter.net [mailto:jwu72687@charter.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 4:15 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

We need to step up to the twenty-first century and recognize mental 

health as a critical part of human health! 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jane Unsworth 

36 Tupelo Rd 

Westport, MA 02790
-----Original Message----- 

From: rcleff@yahoo.com [mailto:rcleff@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:27 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Rebecca Selvin 

834 Chestnut St, Apt 1214 

Philadelphia, PA 19107
-----Original Message----- 

From: lha4444@gmail.com [mailto:lha4444@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:07 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Rev Linda Andrews 

4820 S W Barbur Blvd 

Portland, OR 97239
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 8, 1995 (112), Para 112.15 Appointment of Conferees--H.R. 2002]
[Page 1321]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.112.15  appointment of conferees--h.r. 2002

  Thereupon, the SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, by 
unanimous consent, announced the appointment of Messrs. Wolf, DeLay, 
Regula, Rogers, Lightfoot, Packard, Callahan, Dickey, Livingston, Sabo, 
Durbin, Coleman, Foglietta, and Obey, as managers on the part of the 
House at said conference.
  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate thereof.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-10234

Summary Calendar

CHARLES WILLIAMS; PAT WILLIAMS,

Plaintiffs – Appellants

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE;

MANJULA MODI, Revenue Agent, IRS,

Defendants – Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:10-CV-206

Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiffs-Appellants Charles and Pat Williams (the “Williamses”) appeal

from the district court’s dismissal of their petition to quash two third-party

summonses sent by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) to nonparties Wells

Fargo Bank, N.A., (“Wells Fargo”) and Aurora Loan Services (“Aurora”). 

Because precedent forecloses the Williamses’ appeal, we AFFIRM.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 15, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-10234 Document: 00511696821 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2011
No. 11-10234

As part of an IRS investigation into the Williamses’ federal income tax

liability, the IRS sent third-party summonses to Wells Fargo and Aurora

requesting information relating to the Williamses’ financial dealings with the

two institutions. The summonses were sent, respectively, to locations in Oregon

and Nebraska. The Williamses filed a petition to quash the summonses in the

Northern District of Texas, the district in which they reside.

The district court dismissed the petition for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction, relying on two, almost factually-identical circuit precedents. See

Deal v. United States, 759 F.2d 442 (5th Cir. 1985); Masat v. United States, 745

F.2d 985 (5th Cir. 1984). Deal and Masat concerned taxpayer challenges to IRS

third-party summonses. Both affirmed dismissals for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction, reasoning that the Internal Revenue Code vests jurisdiction over

such challenges in the district court where the third-party resides. See 26 U.S.C.

§ 7609(h)(1) (“The United States district court for the district within which the

person to be summoned resides or is found shall have jurisdiction to hear and

determine any proceeding brought under subsection (b)(2), (f), or (g).”); Deal, 759

F.2d at 444 (holding that Masat “precluded” the taxpayer’s appeal and that

jurisdiction was “exclusively in the district where the third-party record keepers

reside”); Masat, 745 F.2d at 986, 988.

The Williamses acknowledge the holdings in Deal and Masat and concede

that the cases remain good law, but they ask us to overrule our prior precedent

and hold that § 7609(h)(1) is a venue, rather than jurisdictional, statute. The

Rule of Orderliness, of course, prevents us from doing so. See, e.g., Jacobs v.

Nat’l Drug Intelligence Ctr., 548 F.3d 375, 378 (5th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we

AFFIRM.

2

Case: 11-10234 Document: 00511696821 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/15/2011
|EXHIBIT 23.4                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Stockholder and Board of Directors
Vermont Electric Power Company, Inc. as Manager of Vermont Transco LLC:

We consent to the use of our report dated March 7, 2008 included herein with respect to the balance sheets of Vermont Transco LLC as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of income, changes in members' equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2007 and period June 30, 2006 (date of inception) through December 31, 2006, which report appears in the December 31, 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation.

Our report on the financial statements of Vermont Transco LLC refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans as of December 31, 2007.

/ s /   KPMG

Burlington, Vermont
March 10, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.941 What is a low stress reassessment? ( a ) *General.* An operator of a transmission line that operates below 30% SMYS may use the following method to reassess a covered segment in accordance with § 192.939. This method of reassessment addresses the threats of external and internal corrosion. The operator must have conducted a baseline assessment of the covered segment in accordance with the requirements of §§ 192.919 and 192.921.
( b ) *External corrosion.* An operator must take one of the following actions to address external corrosion on the low stress covered segment. ( 1 ) *Cathodically protected pipe.* To address the threat of external corrosion on cathodically protected pipe in a covered segment, an operator must perform an indirect assessment on the covered segment at least once every 7 calendar years. The indirect assessment must be conducted using one of the following means: indirect examination method, such as a close interval survey; alternating current voltage gradient survey; direct current voltage gradient survey; or the equivalent of any of these methods. An operator must evaluate the cathodic protection and corrosion threat for the covered segment and include the results of each indirect assessment as part of the overall evaluation. This evaluation must also include, at a minimum, the leak repair and inspection records, corrosion monitoring records, exposed pipe inspection records, and the pipeline environment.
( 2 ) *Unprotected pipe or cathodically protected pipe where external corrosion assessments are impractical.* If an external corrosion assessment is impractical on the covered segment an operator must— ( i ) Conduct leakage surveys as required by § 192.706 at 4-month intervals; and
( ii ) Every 18 months, identify and remediate areas of active corrosion by evaluating leak repair and inspection records, corrosion monitoring records, exposed pipe inspection records, and the pipeline environment.
( c ) *Internal corrosion.* To address the threat of internal corrosion on a covered segment, an operator must— ( 1 ) Conduct a gas analysis for corrosive agents at least once each calendar year;
( 2 ) Conduct periodic testing of fluids removed from the segment. At least once each calendar year test the fluids removed from each storage field that may affect a covered segment; and
( 3 ) At least every seven (7) years, integrate data from the analysis and testing required by paragraphs (c)(1)-(c)(2) with applicable internal corrosion leak records, incident reports, safety-related condition reports, repair records, patrol records, exposed pipe reports, and test records, and define and implement appropriate remediation actions.
[68 FR 69817, Dec. 15, 2003, as amended by Amdt. 192-95, 69 FR 18234, Apr. 6, 2004; Amdt. 192-132, 87 FR 52279, Aug. 24, 2022]
#### § 1253.10 Accounts.

Accounts shall be kept by each conference, bureau, committee, or other organization subject to sections 5a or 5b to record all receipts and expenditures of moneys. Such accounts shall be kept with sufficient particularity to show the facts pertaining to all transactions reflected in the entries made in the accounts. All receipts shall be supported by records, including records showing the basis for charges to members. All disbursements shall be supported by vouchers, payrolls, canceled checks, and other evidences of expenditures, including the basis for any apportionment of expense items to members.

[32 FR 20474, Dec. 20, 1967]
From: To: Subject: Date: Grimmoete@laol.com .!;&LQill EAS Yakataga, Icy Bay 2012 Tuesday, September04, 2012 9:13:25 PM

Dear Mr. DeVany, Re: Docket DOT-OST-1996-2009 I recently received a copy ofa letterfrom Steven Hatterto you datedAugust 21, 2012 regarding EAS service to Cape Yakataga and Icy Bay. As the owner of Icy Bay Lodge at East Icy Bay, Iwas surprised that East Icy Bay was not mentioned as avital stop for the Essential Air Service. We started construction ofIcy Bay Lodge in 2005 and we have used the EAS service extensively for mail, freight, fuel, groceries and clients. We were recently approved by the State ofAlaska to take clients intoWrangelle-St. Elias National Park, and we have also obtained an Alaska State license to transport big game hunters. We are nowthe only ones operating in Icy Bay for these services. In addition, we maintain the communication station for the Marine Exchange ofAlaska, which monitorsthe movement ofships up and down the coast for weather, emergencies, etc. By this time I believe you have received an e-mail from my caretaker John Peterson in which he describes the services he provides and maintains at Icy Bay Lodge. We have also opened up and maintain a 2800 ft. old World War II gravel air strip on the East side. It is in good enough shape thatwe were able to land D-3's there. Icy Bay is the only safe harborfor many miles and we have had to fly out individuals on the EAS rlight duefo injuries

.. We are part ofthe City of Yakutat and are the eyes and ears for law enforcement in Icy Bay. I have people there year-round looking after the facilities and the communicating system for the Marine Exchange ofAlaska. Forthese reasons I believe that ouractivities at East Icy Bay qualify us to be considered a "community."

While Ican understand that Mr. Hatterdid not recommend continuing EAS stops toWEST Icy Bay due to their "private" airstrip designation, 

### Iwould greatly appreciate your consideration in continuing EAS stops to EAST Icy Bay. Becauseflightsfrom Yakutat to Cape Yakataga would travel directly over Icy Bay, itwould be cost effective make a stop at East Icy Bay as well. Please go to ourweb site atwww.icybaylodge.com and seewhatwe have to offer. Ifyou have any questions please call me at303-807-5657. Thanksfor your consideration. Pete Grimm Owner ofIcy Bay Lodge
From: rthras2@yahoo.com [mailto:rthras2@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 4:42 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ronald Thrasher 

2047 Higbee Ave. 

Memphis, TN 38104
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the May
31, 1997 10KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         351,201
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  418,849
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    478,711
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,283,889
<PP&E>                                         254,692
<DEPRECIATION>                                 166,363
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,377,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          215,997
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        24,018
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,128,180
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,377,305
<SALES>                                      2,906,215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,906,215
<CGS>                                        1,071,651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,687,417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                152,287
<INCOME-TAX>                                    39,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            112,787
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   112,787
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

______________________

No. 18-10897

Non-Argument Calendar

______________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:16-cr-00256-CEM-TBS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TROY BENNETT,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

______________________

(May 10, 2019)

Before, TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 18-10897 Date Filed: 05/10/2019 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Troy Bennett appeals his 300-month sentence, which the district court 

imposed pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). We affirm 

because both of Mr. Bennett’s arguments are foreclosed by Eleventh Circuit 

precedent. See United States v. Hill, 799 F.3d 1318, 1323 (11th Cir. 2015) (holding 

that a conviction for resisting an officer with violence pursuant to Fla. Stat. §843.01 

is a violent felony under the ACCA’s elements clause); United States v. Smith, 775 

F.3d 1262, 1267-68 (11th Cir. 2014) (holding that a conviction for possession of 

cocaine with the intent to distribute pursuant to Fla. Stat. §893.13 is a serious drug 

offense under the ACCA). We recognize Mr. Bennett’s arguments that cases like 

Hill and Smith were incorrectly decided, but we are nevertheless bound to follow 

them. See, e.g., Smith v. GTE Corp., 236 F.3d 1292, 1303 (11th Cir. 2001).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 18-10897 Date Filed: 05/10/2019 Page: 2 of 2
-----Original Message----- 

From: dlrobinson49@netzero.net [mailto:dlrobinson49@netzero.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:28 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

David and Molly Robinson/Detweiler 

P.O. Box 151 

Curlew, WA 99118
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION

The undersignedcertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

(1)  The accompanying Quarterly Reporton Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in theaccompanying Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.
| Date:  June 14, 2007 |                                                             |
|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           | /s/ Joseph C. Christenson                                        |   |
|                           | Joseph C. Christenson                                            |
|                           | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief   Financial Officer |

 

----