alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000018734
<NAME> CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    3,469,945
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      1,531
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         170,360
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     1,187,719
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  51,581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,881,136
<COMMON>                                       168,888
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      405,000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            863,444
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,437,332
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    250,351
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,517,347
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      231
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    74
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,675,801
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                4,881,136
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,073,469
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            15,812
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     775,473
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     791,285
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        282,184
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              56,322
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 338,506
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       132,059
<NET-INCOME>                                   206,447
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     14,469
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  191,978
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       186,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      116,205
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         299,818
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.00
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2197 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2197

 To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to establish a point of 
             order against certain continuing resolutions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 4, 1995

 Mr. Allard (for himself, Mr. Knollenberg, and Mr. Ensign) introduced 
    the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to establish a point of 
             order against certain continuing resolutions.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) title III of 
the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 is amended by adding at the end 
the following new section:

        ``point of order against certain continuing resolutions

    ``Sec. 314. It shall not be in order in the House of 
Representatives or the Senate to consider any bill or joint resolution 
making continuing appropriations for all or part of a fiscal year 
unless it provides that the amount which would be made available or the 
authority which would be granted respecting any pertinent project or 
activity (except appropriated mandatory spending) shall be continued at 
a rate of operations not exceeding the lower of--
            ``(1) ninety-five percent of the current rate; or
            ``(2) if the applicable regular appropriation Act has 
        passed both Houses, then the lowest rate permitted by either 
        version of that Act, except that if the project or activity is 
        funded in only one such version, that project or activity shall 
        be continued under the authority granted by the one House.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of contents set forth in 
section 1(b) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 
1974 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 313 the 
following new item:

``Sec. 314. Point of order against certain continuing resolutions.''.
                                 <all>
```
126 STAT. 1604 PUBLIC LAW 112–224—DEC. 28, 2012 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5837: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012): 

July 23, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 19, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–224 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 26 East 

Genesee Street in Baldwinsville, New York, as the ‘‘Corporal Kyle Schneider 

Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CORPORAL KYLE SCHNEIDER POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 26 East Genesee Street in Baldwinsville, New 

York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Corporal Kyle 

Schneider Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Corporal Kyle Schneider Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 28, 2012. 

Dec. 28, 2012 

[H.R. 5837] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
§ 212.201 General qualifications of State inspection personnel. ( a ) This subpart prescribes the minimum qualification requirements for State railroad safety inspectors, compliance inspectors and inspector apprentices. A State agency may establish more stringent or additional requirements for its employees.
( b ) An inspector, compliance inspector, or apprentice inspector shall be recognized as qualified under this part by the State agency and the Associate Administrator prior to assuming the responsibilities of the position.
( c ) Each inspector, compliance inspectors and apprentice inspector shall be a bona fide employee of the State agency.
( d ) Each inspector, compliance inspector, and apprentice inspector shall demonstrate: ( 1 ) The ability to read and comprehend written materials such as training and enforcement manuals, regulations, operating and safety rules of the railroad, and similar materials;
( 2 ) The ability to compose narrative reports of investigative findings that are clear, complete, and grammatically acceptable;
( 3 ) The ability to record data on standard report forms with a high degree of accuracy;
( 4 ) The ability to communicate orally; and
( 5 ) Basic knowledge of rail transportation functions, the organization of railroad, shipper, and manufacturer companies, and standard industry rules for personal safety.
( e ) Each inspector shall demonstrate a thorough knowledge of: ( 1 ) Railroad rules, practices, record systems, and terminology common to operating and maintenance functions; and
( 2 ) The scope and major requirements of all of the Federal railroad safety laws and regulations.
( f ) In addition to meeting the requirements of this section, each inspector and apprentice inspector shall meet the applicable requirements of §§ 212.203 through 212.229 of this subpart.
[47 FR 41051, Sept. 16, 1982, as amended at 57 FR 28115, June 24, 1992]
-----Original Message----- 

From: josephsmith06@gmail.com [mailto:josephsmith06@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:22 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Joseph Smith 

4228 Knob Oak Ln Apt F 

Charlotte, NC 28211
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Joseph C. Christenson, certifythat:

1) I have reviewed this Form 10-QSBof PPT Vision, Inc.

2) Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4) The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5) The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  September 14, 2007
|        | /s/ Joseph C. Christenson                                        |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph C. Christenson                                            |
|   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief   Financial Officer |

 

----
§ 1313.9 Grounds for complaints and contract review. ( a ) A complaint may be filed against a contract covered by this part: ( 1 ) By any shipper on the ground that such shipper individually will be harmed because the contract unduly impairs the ability of the contracting rail carrier or carriers to meet their common carrier obligations to the complainant under 49 U.S.C. 11101;
( 2 ) By a port on the ground that such port individually will be harmed because the contract will result in unreasonable discrimination against such port; and
( 3 ) By a shipper of agricultural commodities on the ground that such shipper individually will be harmed because: ( i ) The rail carrier has unreasonably discriminated by refusing to enter into a contract with such shipper for rates and services for the transportation of the same type of commodity under similar conditions to the contract at issue, and that such shipper was ready, willing, and able to enter into such a contract at a time essentially contemporaneous with the period during which the contract at issue was offered; or
( ii ) The contract constitutes a destructive competitive practice.
( b ) *Unreasonable discrimination,* for purposes of paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section, has the same meaning as the term has under 49 U.S.C. 10741.
#### § 214.5 Responsibility for compliance.

Any person (an entity of any type covered under 1 U.S.C. 1, including but not limited to the following: a railroad; a manager, supervisor, official, or other employee or agent of a railroad; any owner, manufacturer, lessor, or lessee of railroad equipment, track, or facilities; any independent contractor providing goods or services to a railroad; and any employee of such owner, manufacturer, lessor, lessee, or independent contractor) who violates any requirement of this part or causes the violation of any such requirement is subject to a civil penalty of at least $1,086 and not more than $35,516 per violation, except that penalties may be assessed against individuals only for willful violations, and where a grossly negligent violation or a pattern of repeated violations has created an imminent hazard of death or injury, or has caused death or injury, a penalty not to exceed $142,063 per violation may be assessed. See FRA's website at *www.fra.dot.gov* for a statement of agency civil penalty policy.

[57 FR 28127, June 24, 1992, as amended at 63 FR 11620, Mar. 10, 1998; 69 FR 30593, May 28, 2004; 72 FR 51196, Sept. 6, 2007; 73 FR 79701, Dec. 30, 2008; 77 FR 24419, Apr. 24, 2012; 81 FR 43109, July 1, 2016; 82 FR 16132, Apr. 3, 2017; 83 FR 60746, Nov. 27, 2018; 84 FR 23734, May 23, 2019; 84 FR 37072, July 31, 2019; 86 FR 1757, Jan. 11, 2021; 86 FR 23253, May 3, 2021; 87 FR 15867, Mar. 21, 2022; 88 FR 1126, Jan. 6, 2023; 88 FR 89561, Dec. 28, 2023]
1

The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-1496

___________

Derek L. Givens, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Cingular Wireless, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: February 4, 2005

Filed: February 7, 2005

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Derek L. Givens appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in his employment-discrimination action. Having carefully reviewed the

record, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of

review), we affirm. 

As to Givens’s hostile-work-environment claim, we agree with the district

court Givens did not show that he was subjected to conduct extreme enough to
-2-

change the terms and conditions of his employment, see Burkett v. Glickman, 327

F.3d 658, 662 (8th Cir. 2003), or that the conduct was due to his race or gender. As

to Givens’s retaliation claim, we also agree that placing Givens on a “performance

improvement plan,” without more, did not constitute an adverse employment action,

see Henthorn v. Capitol Communications, Inc., 359 F.3d 1021, 1028 (8th Cir. 2004)

(negative employment review is actionable only if it is later used as basis to alter in

detrimental way terms or conditions of recipient’s employment); and we find no basis

in the record for a constructive-discharge claim, see Summit v. S-B Power Tool, 121

F.3d 416, 421 (8th Cir. 1997) (explaining constructive discharge), cert. denied, 523

U.S. 1004 (1998). Finally, Givens’s complaint about his counsel’s representation in

the district court is not a basis for reversal. See Glick v. Henderson, 855 F.2d 536,

541 (8th Cir. 1988). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Order entered April 25, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00242-CV

No. 05-21-00373-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.C.M. AND M.A.M., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 366-53554-2020 and 366-50778-2021

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s April 20, 2022 opposed second motion for a 

sixty-day extension of time to file his brief in each of these appeals. Appellee 

explains the extension is necessary, in part, because the reporter’s record is 

incomplete and he “is in the process of trying to fund” the missing portion.

We GRANT the motion to the extent we SUSPEND the briefing deadline. 

We ORDER appellee to file, no later than May 5, 2022, written verification he has 

paid or made arrangements to pay for the missing record. We caution appellee that 

failure to comply may result in the appeal being submitted on the record currently 

before the Court.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         170,037
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              28
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    229,850
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         778,719
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           786,590
<LOANS>                                      1,500,541
<ALLOWANCE>                                     24,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,935,780
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,991,290
<SHORT-TERM>                                   487,176
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             34,388
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       422,926
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,935,780
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                115,889
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               43,816
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,828
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               161,533
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              41,934
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              55,954
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          105,579
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,600
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 371
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 78,759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 67,819
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      67,819
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,044
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,138
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,662
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 65,163
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                24,530
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    8,507
<RECOVERIES>                                     4,577
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               24,200
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            11,133
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         13,067
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Manfred F. Dyck, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Hydromer, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Hydromer, Inc.

|                   |     |                                                
|------------------ | --- | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2009 | By: | /s/ Manfred F. Dyck                            
|                   |     | Manfred F. Dyck                                
|                   |     | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer





12
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 10, 1995 (125), Para 125.25 Additional Sponsors]
[Pages 1498-1499]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.125.25  additional sponsors

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were added to public bills and 
resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 156: Mr. Ehlers and Mr. Riggs.
       H.R. 244: Ms. DeLauro and Mr. Doyle.
       H.R. 393: Mr. Souder.
       H.R. 528: Mr. Tejeda, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. Poshard, Mr. 
     Faleomavaega, and Mr. McHale.
       H.R. 540: Mr. Engel and Mr. Quinn.
       H.R. 721: Mr. Torricelli.
       H.R. 911: Mr. Camp, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mrs. Thurman, Mr. 
     Kolbe, Mr. McDade, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Goss, Mr. Walker, and 
     Mr. Rogers.
       H.R. 969: Ms. Rivers and Ms. Lofgren.
       H.R. 1083: Mr. Andrews.
       H.R. 1201: Ms. McKinney, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. 
     Mineta, Mr. Nadler, and Mr. Foglietta.

[[Page 1499]]

       H.R. 1202: Mr. Dixon, Mrs. Meyers of Kansas, Mr. Skaggs, 
     and Mr. Zimmer.
       H.R. 1226: Mr. Pickett, Mr. Burton of Indiana, and Mr. 
     McCollum.
       H.R. 1521: Mr. Foglietta and Ms. Roybal-Allard.
       H.R. 1733: Mr. Ney, Ms. Lofgren, and Mr. Richardson.
       H.R. 1846: Ms. Furse, Mr. Shays, and Mr. Stark.
       H.R. 1930: Mr. Richardson.
       H.R. 1968: Mr. Ehlers.
       H.R. 2027: Mr. Dellums and Mr. Cramer.
       H.R. 2090: Mr. Doyle and Mr. Blute.
       H.R. 2098: Mr. Neumann, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, and Mr. 
     Bereuter.
       H.R. 2169: Mr. Hamilton.
       H.R. 2181: Ms. Roybal-Allard.
       H.R. 2193: Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Bunn of Oregon, Mr. Fazio of 
     California, and Mr. Cunningham.
       H.R. 2268: Mr. Leach and Mr. Ganske.
       H.R. 2270: Mr. Crapo, Mr. Kolbe, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Hoekstra, 
     and Mr. Stockman.
       H.R. 2306: Mr. Wynn.
       H.R. 2326: Mr. Davis, Mr. Skeen, Mr. Fattah, Mr. Clement, 
     Mrs. Morella, and Mr. Martini.
       H.R. 2341: Mr. Skeen and Mr. Hoke.
       H.R. 2367: Mr. Hutchinson and Mr. Duncan.
       H.R. 2411: Mr. Lucas, Mrs. Clayton, Mr. McHugh, and Mr. 
     Ehlers.
       H.R. 2422: Mr. Clay, Mr. Miller of California, Ms. Jackson-
     Lee, Mr. Frazer, Mr. Wise, and Mr. Rangel.
       H.J. Res. 70: Mrs. Thurman.
       H. Con. Res. 50: Mr. Oberstar, Mr. Jacobs, Mr. Brown of 
     Ohio, and Mr. Matsui.
       H. Res. 118: Mr. Mineta, Mr. Hoyer, Mrs. Meyers of Kansas, 
     and Mr. Foglietta.
```