alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 229.315 Operations and maintenance manual. ( a ) The railroad shall maintain all documents pertaining to the installation, maintenance, repair, modification, inspection, and testing of a product subject to this part in one Operations and Maintenance Manual (OMM). ( 1 ) The OMM shall be legible and shall be readily available to persons who conduct the installation, maintenance, repair, modification, inspection, and testing, and for inspection by FRA.
( 2 ) At a minimum, the OMM shall contain all product vendor operation and maintenance guidance.
( b ) The OMM shall contain the plans and detailed information necessary for the proper maintenance, repair, inspection, and testing of products subject to this subpart. The plans shall identify all software versions, revisions, and revision dates.
( c ) Hardware, software, and firmware revisions shall be documented in the OMM according to the railroad's configuration management control plan.
( d ) Safety-critical components, including spare products, shall be positively identified, handled, replaced, and repaired in accordance with the procedures specified in the railroad's configuration management control plan.
( e ) A railroad shall determine that the requirements of this section have been met prior to placing a product subject to this subpart in use on their property.
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.175 Pipe-type and bottle-type holders. ( a ) Each pipe-type and bottle-type holder must be designed so as to prevent the accumulation of liquids in the holder, in connecting pipe, or in auxiliary equipment, that might cause corrosion or interfere with the safe operation of the holder.
( b ) Each pipe-type or bottle-type holder must have minimum clearance from other holders in accordance with the following formula:
C = (3D*P*F)/1000) in inches; (C = (3D*P*F*)/6,895) in millimeters in which: *C* = Minimum clearance between pipe containers or bottles in inches (millimeters). *D* = Outside diameter of pipe containers or bottles in inches (millimeters). *P* = Maximum allowable operating pressure, psi (kPa) gauge. *F* = Design factor as set forth in § 192.111 of this part.
[35 FR 13257, Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37503, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-123, 82 FR 7997, Jan. 23, 2017]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, October 6, 1995 (124), Para 124.13 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1495]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.124.13  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. STUMP: Committee on Veterans' Affairs. H.R. 2394. A 
     bill to increase, effective as of December 1, 1995, the rates 
     of compensation for veterans with service-connected 
     disabilities and the rates of dependency and indemnity 
     compensation for the survivors of certain disabled veterans 
     (Rept. No. 104-273). Referred to the Committee of the Whole 
     House on the State of the Union.
```
N. Y. SUPERIOR COURT.

#### Peter Robertson agt. James Gordon Bennett.

*Special*Term,

January, 1877.

*Pleading—demurrer—answer—amendment.*

After the service of a demurrer any time before the expiration of twenty days, it may be substituted by an answer as an amendment.

*William W. Badger,*for plaintiff.

*John*Townshend, for defendant.

Speir, J.

Motion that the plaintiff’s attorney accept an amended answer after the service upon him of a demurrer to the complaint, under section 172 of the Code. The action is for an alleged libel. The defendant served the plaintiff with a demurrer to the complaint. Eleven days after the service, the defendant served the plaintiff with an answer withdrawing his demurrer. The plaintiff returned the answer, claiming that he had noticed the case for argument on the demurrer. Defendant claims that the demurrer is a pleading, and that he had the right to amend any time before the expiration of twenty days. I am not aware that the practice in such a case has been the subject of any adjudication, and none has been furnished me. The right to amend is absolute. This court decided *(Mason*agt. Whitley, 4 Duer, 611) that a complaint might be amended, although the amendment amounted •to a new and distinct cause of action that can properly be united in the complaint. And it has been broadly held that *288the only limitation upon the right to amend or upon the nature of the amendments to be made is that it shall not be' done for the purpose of delay, nor under such circumstances as to prevent a trial at a *“*term for which the cause is or may be noticed.” These objections are not alleged to exist. No delay has been occasioned by the amendment. In the case of *Hollister*agt. *Livingston*(9 How., 140), it was decided that the amendments under this section are restricted to the matters of the original pleadings. This decision has in later cases been overruled, and it has since been decided that the defendant may serve an amended answer containing an entire new and different defense from that contained in the original answer. It seems to me, adopting the later interpretations of the statute — that the plaintiff may amend by adding a new count or cause of action, and that the defendant may amend his answer, containing a new and different defense from that contained in the original answer — it must follow that the answer must be received as an amendment in the place of the demurrer. The defense in one case is that the complaint contains no cause of action, and in the other a denial of the allegations in the complaint. As the plaintiff put his case on the demurrer calendar, he must have costs of the motion.

Motion granted.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PHI Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Henry Fahman, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Henry FahmanHenry FahmanActing CFONovember 10, 2009

---
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.361 Service lines: Installation. ( a ) *Depth.* Each buried service line must be installed with at least 12 inches (305 millimeters) of cover in private property and at least 18 inches (457 millimeters) of cover in streets and roads. However, where an underground structure prevents installation at those depths, the service line must be able to withstand any anticipated external load.
( b ) *Support and backfill.* Each service line must be properly supported on undisturbed or well-compacted soil, and material used for backfill must be free of materials that could damage the pipe or its coating.
( c ) *Grading for drainage.* Where condensate in the gas might cause interruption in the gas supply to the customer, the service line must be graded so as to drain into the main or into drips at the low points in the service line.
( d ) *Protection against piping strain and external loading.* Each service line must be installed so as to minimize anticipated piping strain and external loading.
( e ) *Installation of service lines into buildings.* Each underground service line installed below grade through the outer foundation wall of a building must: ( 1 ) In the case of a metal service line, be protected against corrosion;
( 2 ) In the case of a plastic service line, be protected from shearing action and backfill settlement; and
( 3 ) Be sealed at the foundation wall to prevent leakage into the building.
( f ) *Installation of service lines under buildings.* Where an underground service line is installed under a building: ( 1 ) It must be encased in a gas tight conduit;
( 2 ) The conduit and the service line must, if the service line supplies the building it underlies, extend into a normally usable and accessible part of the building; and
( 3 ) The space between the conduit and the service line must be sealed to prevent gas leakage into the building and, if the conduit is sealed at both ends, a vent line from the annular space must extend to a point where gas would not be a hazard, and extend above grade, terminating in a rain and insect resistant fitting.
( g ) *Locating underground service lines.* Each underground nonmetallic service line that is not encased must have a means of locating the pipe that complies with § 192.321(e).
[35 FR 13257, Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 192-75, 61 FR 18517, Apr. 26, 1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37503, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53900, Sept. 15, 2003]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Knee Surgery Clinical Trial.                     

*Date:*                         August 13, 2007.                     

*Time:*                         3 p.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Building 16, 16 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                     

*Contact Person:*                         Michael L. Bloom, PhD, MBA, Scientific Review Administrator, EP Review Branch, NIH/NIAMS, One Democracy Plaza, Room 820, MSC 4872, 6701 Democracy Blvd, Bethesda, MD 20892-4872, 301-594-4953,                         *Michael_Bloom@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 16, 2007. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-3585 Filed 7-23-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 230.31 Flues to be removed. ( a ) *Inspection of the boiler interior.* During the 1472 service day inspection, the steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall remove all flues of steam locomotive boilers in service, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, for the purpose of inspecting the entire interior of the boiler and its bracing. After removing the flues, the steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall enter the boiler to remove scale from the interior and thoroughly clean and inspect it.
( b ) *NDE testing.* If the boiler can be thoroughly cleaned and inspected without removing the superheater flues, and it can be shown through appropriate NDE testing methods that they are safe and suitable for service, their removal may not be required at this time. Their removal may be required, however, if the FRA inspector, or the steam locomotive owner and/or operator, considers it necessary due to identifiable safety concerns.
#### § 229.53 Brake gauges.

All mechanical gauges and all devices providing indication of air pressure electronically that are used by the engineer to aid in the control or braking of the train or locomotive shall be located so that they may be conveniently read from the engineer's usual position during operation of the locomotive. A gauge or device shall not be more than five percent or three pounds per square inch in error, whichever is less.

[66 FR 4192, Jan. 17, 2001]
I

★

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2336

To amend the Doug Barnard, Jr.—1996 Atlanta Centennial Olympic Games

Commemorative Coin Act, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 14, 1995

Mr. BARR (for himself, Mr. GINGRICH, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. NORWOOD, Ms.

MCKINNEY, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. BISHOP, and Mr. LINDER) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Banking and

Financial Services

A BILL

To amend the Doug Barnard, Jr.—1996 Atlanta Centennial

Olympic Games Commemorative Coin Act, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHANGES IN COIN SPECIFICATIONS.

4 Section 102 of the Doug Barnard, Jr.—1996 Atlanta

5 Centennial Olympic Games Commemorative Coin Act (91

6 U.S.C. 5112 note) is amended—

7 (1) in the table at the end of subsection (a)—
2

HR 2336 IH1S

1 (A) by striking ‘‘Not more than 175,000

2 each of 2 coins of different designs’’ and insert3 ing ‘‘2 coins of different designs, in quantities

4 not to exceed 175,000 of each design’’; and

5 (B) by striking ‘‘Not more than 300,000

6 each of 2 coins of different designs’’ and insert7 ing ‘‘2 coins of different designs, in quantities

8 not to exceed 100,000 of the first design and

9 not to exceed 150,000 of the second design’’;

10 (2) in the table at the end of subsection (b)—

11 (A) by striking ‘‘Not more than 750,000

12 each of 4 coins of different designs’’ and insert13 ing ‘‘4 coins of different designs, in quantities

14 not to exceed 750,000 of each design’’; and

15 (B) by striking ‘‘Not more than 1,000,000

16 each of 4 coins of different designs’’ and insert17 ing ‘‘4 coins of different designs, in quantities

18 not to exceed 350,000 of each of the first 2 de19 signs, and not to exceed 500,000 of each of the

20 remaining 2 designs’’; and

21 (3) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the

22 following:

23 ‘‘(c) HALF DOLLAR CLAD COINS.—
3

HR 2336 IH1S

1 ‘‘(1) SPECIFICATIONS.—The Secretary shall

2 issue not more than 8,000,000 half dollar coins,

3 each of which shall—

4 ‘‘(A) weigh 11.34 grams;

5 ‘‘(B) have a diameter of 30.61 millimeters;

6 ‘‘(C) be minted to the specifications for

7 half dollar coins under section 5112(b) of title

8 31, United States Code; and

9 ‘‘(D) contain an inscription of the year

10 ‘1995’ or ‘1996’, as the Secretary determines to

11 be appropriate.

12 ‘‘(2) DESIGNS.—Coins issued under paragraph

13 (1) shall be of 4 designs selected in accordance with

14 this Act in such quantities as the Secretary deter15 mines to be appropriate.’’.

Æ
-----Original Message----- 

From: panettim@sbcglobal.net [mailto:panettim@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:27 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

 Please support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and Pete 

Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 1210-

AB30). 

 Support the strong ruls to forbid insurance companies from charging higher 

copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental health 

treatment than they would for other physical health care. This is simply 

unconscionable. 

 Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care 

coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Marjory Panetti 

236 1/2 San Jose Ave 

San Francisco, CA 94110
CAUSE NO. Fl 4284 

STATE OF TEXAS 

vs. 

NICHOLAS EDWARD AYERS 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

TO SAID HONORABLE COURT: 

FILED FOR RECORD 

20\5 SEP 23 ~I'\ \O: 45 

"'\~· ;' _ _.:;~.;,.~;G'.~ 

"01¥i'p,\~( .~s E P'f xr,s 

MP,P.\Oll co0,11"1 'P 

IN THE DISTRICTCd0RT '3.~o~ . 

276TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

MARION COUNTY, TEXAS 

COMES NOW Nicholas Edward Ayers, defendant in the above styled and 

numbered cause, and gives notice of appeal from the sentence imposed against 

him in this cause on August 27, 2015, all pursuant to Rule 25.2, Rules of 

Appellate Procedure, and further shows that this is an appeal from a bench trial 

in which Defendant pleaded guilty and his punishment was assessed by the court 

at eighteen years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas 

Department of Criminal Justice. 

WHEREFORE, defendant requests the Clerk to file this notice of appeal 

and immediately send one copy to the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Judicial 

District and one copy to the State's attorney and that the Clerk prepare a Clerk's 

Record in accordance with Rule 34.5(a)(2), Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure, to 

be sent to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. 

Respectfully submitted, 

1

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 9/23/2015 2:12:47 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
~ Counsel for Defendant 

202 S. Marshall, P.O. Box 276 

Jefferson, Texas 75657 

903-665-7111 

Fax: 903-665-7167 

Texas Bar #07038000 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that I have hand delivered a true copy of the foregoing Notice of 

Appeal to Angela Smoak, counsel for the State, on this 23rd day of September, 

2015. 

~~~ James P. Finstrom 

2
-----Original Message----- 

From: lebrittain@yahoo.com [mailto:lebrittain@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:02 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lauren Bradley 

302 W Weaver St 

Carrboro, NC 27510
#### § 236.819 Switch, hand operated.

A non-interlocked switch which can only be operated manually.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership - II (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual        General Partner and Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of the Partnership.

     May 15, 2009     /s/ Joseph M. Jayson                         Date             Joseph M. Jayson,     

                               Individual General Partner and                                       Principal Financial Officer
#### § 233.1 Scope.

This part prescribed reporting requirements with respect to methods of train operation, block signal systems, interlockings, traffic control systems, automatic train stop, train control, and cab signal systems, or other similar appliances, methods, and systems.
-----Original Message----- 

From: robinlskoglund@gmail.com [mailto:robinlskoglund@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:11 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Robin Skoglund 

robinlskoglund@gmail.com 

Sincerely, 

Robin Skoglund 

1702 Searcy Dr. 

San Antonio, TX 78232
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, September 18, 1995 (116), Para 116.6 District Court Demonstration Projects]
[Page 1364]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.116.6  district court demonstration projects

  Mr. MOORHEAD moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill of the 
Senate (S. 464) to make the reporting deadlines for studies conducted in 
Federal court demonstration districts consistent with the deadlines for 
pilot districts, and for other purposes.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. CLINGER, recognized Mr. MOORHEAD and Mr. 
SCOTT, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. CLINGER, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and 
said bill was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate thereof.
```