alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 10, 1995 (125), Para 125.26 Petitions, Etc.]
[Page 1499]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.125.26  petitions, etc.

  Under clause 1 of rule XXII,

       44. The SPEAKER presented a petition of Gregory D. Watson, 
     Austin, TX, relative to bringing to the attention of the U.S. 
     House of Representatives a joint resolution adopted by both 
     chambers of the Legislature of the State of Alabama in the 
     year 1959 memorializing the Congress to call a convention to 
     consider and submit an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to 
     delegate to the several States the power to establish and 
     maintain exclusive control of public education within their 
     respective boundaries; which was referred to the Committee on 
     the Judiciary.

```
-----Original Message----- 

From: silan@juno.com [mailto:silan@juno.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:17 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sheila Silan 

6600 Summerhill Rd 

Somerset, CA 95684
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                      Exhibit 12

                        Central Power and Light Company
                       Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                          For Years Ended December 31
<CAPTION>

                                  2001     2000      1999      1998      1997
                                           (thousands, except ratios)
<S>                            <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>

Operating Income...............$295,731  $307,098  $293,985  $282,787  $251,319
Adjustments
  Income Taxes................. 188,922    84,329    83,508   126,738    39,329
  Provision for
    Deferred Income
      Taxes.................... (72,568)   16,263    19,938    (8,328)   34,458
Deferred Investment
      Tax Credits..............  (5,207)   (5,207)   (5,207)   (3,858)   (4,819)
Charges for Investments
      and Plant Development
      Costs, Net of Tax........    -         -         -         -       (1,281)
Other Income and Deductions....   1,954     7,235     8,113       709     7,834
Allowance for Borrowed and
  Equity Funds Used During
  Construction.................   7,804     6,216     4,532     2,822     3,778
Earnings.......................$416,636  $415,934  $404,869  $400,870  $330,618

Fixed Charges:
  Interest on
   Long-term Debt..............$ 86,980  $ 96,212  $ 87,413  $ 93,301  $105,081
  Interest on
   Short-term Debt.............  25,023    22,830    19,498    19,506    20,613
  Distributions on Trust
   Preferred Securities........  11,208    11,940    12,000    12,000     7,533
    Fixed Charges..............$123,211  $130,982  $118,911  $124,807  $133,227

Ratio of Earnings to
  Fixed Charges................    3.38      3.17      3.40      3.21      2.48
</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: sjh@dcn.davis.ca.us [mailto:sjh@dcn.davis.ca.us] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 8:13 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sabra Hillis 

2323 Westernesse Rd. 

Davis, CA 95616
-----Original Message----- 

From: hopepdx@gmail.com [mailto:hopepdx@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:16 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

hope king 

11009 minnesota avenue 

penngrove, CA 94951
EXHIBIT 11.1



                     BOSTON BIOMEDICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                  STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF INCOME PER SHARE

                             WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      Year Ended December 31,
                                             ---------------------------------------
                                                1994           1995           1996
                                             ---------      ---------      ---------
<S>                                             <C>            <C>            <C>
Average Common Stock Outstanding             2,551,946      2,569,641      2,915,522

Net effect of dilutive Common Stock
  Equivalents-based on treasury stock
  method using average market price               -           548,541        424,714

Issuance of "Cheap Stock"                       35,191         33,295

                                             ---------      ---------      ---------
                                             2,587,137      3,151,477      3,340,236
                                             =========      =========      =========


Net Income                                   $  96,528      $ 102,990      $ 481,220

Add: net reduction of interest on debt,
  less 40% taxes                                  -            27,258           -

Adjusted net income for earnings per         ---------      ---------      ---------
share calculation                            $  96,528      $ 130,248      $ 481,220
                                             =========      =========      =========

Income (loss) per share                           0.04           0.04           0.04
                                             =========      =========      =========


</TABLE>
# C_2004112EN.01003901.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/39

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘proposal for a Council Directive imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products (codified version)’

(COM(2004) 35 final – 2004/0004 (CNS))

(2004/C 112/10)

On 10 March 2004 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 100 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the above-mentioned proposal

The Section for Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society, which was responsible for preparing the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its opinion on 2 March 2004. The rapporteur was Mr Wilkinson.

At its 407th plenary session, held on 31 March and 1 April 2004, (meeting of 31 March 2004), the European Economic and Social Committee adopted the following opinion by 98 votes to 1 with 2 abstentions.

| 1. | Because the clarity and transparency of Community law are important, the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission have stressed the need to codify frequently amended legislative texts under an agreed and rapid procedure. In this process no changes of substance may be made (1). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Because the clarity and transparency of Community law are important, the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission have stressed the need to codify frequently amended legislative texts under an agreed and rapid procedure. In this process no changes of substance may be made (1).

1

| 2. | The Committee approves and encourages the work to simplify the acquis communautaire, and especially the procedures for consolidating and codifying existing legislation. This work contributes to good democratic governance by making it easier to understand the acquis communautaire and apply it properly. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Committee approves and encourages the work to simplify the acquis communautaire, and especially the procedures for consolidating and codifying existing legislation. This work contributes to good democratic governance by making it easier to understand the acquis communautaire and apply it properly.

Brussels, 31 March 2004.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Roger BRIESCH

---

(1)  For the opinion of the EESC on the substance of this subject see OJ C 133/4 of 6.6.2003.

1

---
#### Page *v.*Snell, *Ex'x.*

To entitle one to recover pay for services, it is not necessary to prove an express promise to pay. The promise or understanding that the services were to be paid for may be inferred from the benefit received and other attendant circumstances.

Assumpsit, for services in nursing, and for boarding the defendant’s testate. When the services were rendered, the plaintiff’s husband, a son of the deceased, was his tenant, managing his farm upon shares. They all occupied the same house, the deceased living apart from the others constituting a separate family. The referee found an “ implied promise of the deceased to pay for the services,” and awarded damages. Judgment was ordered on the report, and the defendant excepted.

*Copeland Sf*Edgerly, for the defendant.

*C. K.*Sanborn, for the plaintiff.

Allen, J.

If the referee, in finding an “ implied promise,” intended to find that, from the facts stated, a promise resulted as a conclusive presumption of law, the finding was erroneous. *Bickford*v. Dane, 58 N. H. 185; *Savings-Bank*v. Getchell, *ante*281. It is more natural and probable that by the phrase “implied promise” the referee intended to convey the idea that the testator made no express promise to pay the plaintiff, but, from the benefits he received from the services and other facts proved, a promise or understanding on his part that he was to pay was inferred. A promise or contract found by inference from other facts has been sometimes called an implied promise or contract. *Hatch*v. *Pur*cell, 21 N. H. 544, 547. Such a promise, taken as an inference of fact and not as a presumption of law, there was warrant for finding from the facts stated, which were competent evidence for that purpose.

N o question of kindred or relationship between the plaintiff and the testator could have arisen; nor if it had would it have made any difference. *Bundy*v. Hyde, 50 N. H. 116, 123. The question was, whether there was a mutual understanding between the plaintiff and the deceased, on her part that she was to be paid for her services, and on his part that he was to pay for them. The referee, having inferred and found such an understanding, properly awarded damages to the plaintiff.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Foster, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
-----Original Message----- 

From: d.campbell.14@hotmail.com [mailto:d.campbell.14@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:02 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Danyelle Campbell 

20965 Lahser Rd. Spt 415 

Southfield, MI 48033
#### Jacob Williams, *Respondent, v.*Ira B. Sedore and another, *as Administrators, etc., Appellants.*

— • Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered Before another referee to be appointed at Special Term, with costs to abide the event. Opinion by

Barker, J.
-----Original Message----- 

From: mkustritz@northlandcounseling.org 

[mailto:mkustritz@northlandcounseling.org] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 4:11 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

matthew Kustritz 

215 SE 2nd Ave 

Grand Rapids, MN 55744
From: Kerrykillelea@hotmail.com [mailto:Kerrykillelea@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:08 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kerry Killelea 

1145 S. Holt Ave., # 6 

Los Angeles, CA 90035
Editorial Note on Part 193
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

§ 193.2059 Flammable vapor-gas dispersion protection. Each LNG container and LNG transfer system must have a dispersion exclusion zone in accordance with sections 2.2.3.3 and 2.2.3.4 of NFPA-59A-2001 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 193.2013) with the following exceptions: ( a ) Flammable vapor-gas dispersion distances must be determined in accordance with the model described in the GTI-04/0049, “LNG Vapor Dispersion Prediction with the DEGADIS 2.1 Dense Gas Dispersion Model”” (incorporated by reference, *see* § 193.2013).” Alternatively, in order to account for additional cloud dilution which may be caused by the complex flow patterns induced by tank and dike structure, dispersion distances may be calculated in accordance with the model described in the Gas Research Institute report GRI-96/0396.5 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 193.2013), “Evaluation of Mitigation Methods for Accidental LNG Releases. Volume 5: Using FEM3A for LNG Accident Consequence Analyses”. The use of alternate models which take into account the same physical factors and have been validated by experimental test data shall be permitted, subject to the Administrator's approval.
( b ) The following dispersion parameters must be used in computing dispersion distances: ( 1 ) Average gas concentration in air = 2.5 percent.
( 2 ) Dispersion conditions are a combination of those which result in longer predicted downwind dispersion distances than other weather conditions at the site at least 90 percent of the time, based on figures maintained by National Weather Service of the U.S. Department of Commerce, or as an alternative where the model used gives longer distances at lower wind speeds, Atmospheric Stability (Pasquill Class) F, wind speed = 4.5 miles per hour (2.01 meters/sec) at reference height of 10 meters, relative humidity = 50.0 percent, and atmospheric temperature = average in the region.
( 3 ) The elevation for contour (receptor) output H = 0.5 meters.
( 4 ) A surface roughness factor of 0.03 meters shall be used. Higher values for the roughness factor may be used if it can be shown that the terrain both upwind and downwind of the vapor cloud has dense vegetation and that the vapor cloud height is more than ten times the height of the obstacles encountered by the vapor cloud.
( c ) The design spill shall be determined in accordance with section 2.2.3.5 of NFPA-59A-2001 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 193.2013).
[Amdt. 193-17, 65 FR 10959, Mar. 1, 2000, as amended by Amdt. 193-18, 69 FR 11336, Mar. 10, 2004; Amdt. 193-25, 80 FR 183, Jan. 5, 2015]
**GAO-10-507R**                      Published: Apr 26, 2010. Publicly Released: Apr 26, 2010.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007, Pub. L. No. 109-364, 323 directed the Comptroller General to assess (1) the Army's progress completing its modular transformation initiative; (2) the status of Army efforts to reconstitute its prepositioned material stock; and (3) the Army's progress in its efforts to repair, recapitalize, and replace equipment used in current overseas operations. This is the final briefing on these issues.

## Full Report

Full Report (22 pages)

Accessible Text 

## GAO Contacts

John Pendleton
pendletonj@gao.gov

(202) 512-3489

## Office of Public Affairs

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

National Defense

Armed forces abroadArmy personnelArmy procurementCombat readinessDefense capabilitiesEquipment managementForce structureLogisticsMilitary forcesProtective equipmentReporting requirementsRequirements definitionStaff utilizationStrategic forcesStrategic planningSystems testingUse of fundsMilitary materiel
-----Original Message----- 

From: xpuente@csupomona.edu [mailto:xpuente@csupomona.edu] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:04 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

xavier puente 

711 bridewell street # 3 

los angeles, CA 90042
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of LKA Gold Incorporated (the "Registrant") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Kye Abraham, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



Dated:  April 17, 2017



            /s/ Kye Abraham

_________________________________________

Kye Abraham

Chief Executive Officer