SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST (in accordance with 40 CPR Part 51

- App. V) SIP Submitted
by: Virginia Department

of Environmental Quality (V ADEQ) Date Submitted: June
1, 2015 Subject: Regulation Amendments regarding Proposal for redesignation

of areas in Northern Virginia fromnonattainment

to maintenance
and attainment Completeness Review Completed
by: Maria Pino Date Completed: 6/23/2015 Administrative Materials

ACCEPTABLE 

# I
EPA REQUIREMENT



# I STATE SUBMITTAL



## I 

# oo

I 1. A formal signed, stamped, and dated letter of submittal from

1. Yes, Letter dated June
1, 2015, to Diana Esher, EPA he Governor

or his designee, requesting EPA approval
of the Region III Air Protection Division Director from V ADEQ plan or revision thereof.

If electing

to submit

a paper Director David K. Paylor.



### P' submission with

a copy in electronic version, the submittal letter must verify that the electronic copy provided

is an exact duplicate
of the paper submission. 2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code 2. Yes, the regulation amendments were adopted by the State pr body of regulations;

or issued the permit, order, consent
Air Pollution Control Board on December

8, 2014.The agreement

in final form. That evidence shall include the date effective date is March 11, 2015. This is stated in the



### P' pf adoption
or final issuance

as well as the effective date of the Certification

of Public participation Activities and Compliance plan, if different from the adoption/issuance
date.
with State Administrative Procedures document, and in Enclosure

1 of the SIP revision

G 14 concerning PM2.5 Nonattainment

and Maintenance Areas, Northern Virginia 3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority

3. Yes, Virginia has the authority under Section 10.1-1185
of


### p **~der** State law to adopt and implement
the plan.

the Code ofVirginia,

as stated in the June
1, 2015 submittal letter. 4. A copy of actual regulation,

or document submitted
for

4. Yes, the revisions

to the state regulation have been adopted



### p **~pproval** and incorporation

by reference into the plan, including into the state's regulation. This is evidenced

in the Virginia indication

of the changes made (such as redline/strikethrough) Register
of Regulations, Volume 31, Issue 12, page 1012.EPA REQUIREMENT

**l~o** the existing approved plan, where applicable. The

submission shall include a copy of the official State !regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate

State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State.

The effective date of any regulation/document contained in the

submission shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the regulation/document itself; otherwise the State should include a

letter signed, stamped, and dated by the appropriate State

:official indicating the effective date. If the **~egulation/document** provided by the State for approval and

incorporation by reference into the plan is a copy of an existing
tpublication, the State submission should, whenever possible,

, include a copy of the publication cover page and table of

contents.

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting

and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. STATE SUBMITTAL

5. Yes. The regulation amendments were adopted December 8,

2014 and published in the Virginia Register ofRegulations on

Feb. 9, 2016. Such documents were certified by the Attorney

General within the State Air Pollution Control Board's

Authority on December 15, 2014, became enforceable under

state law and submitted to the Virginia Register by the
Department of Environmental Quality as a true copy of the

adopted regulation on January 7, 2015. All of these actions are

pursuant with Section 2.l(d) of Appendix V of 40 CFR Part 51.

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed 6. Yes, a public notice of a 30 day comment period lasting **(~** w

1change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including from April 20, 2015 through May 20, 2015 was issued. This 1 p

!the date of publication of such notice. [SIP 2] notice was published in the Virginia Register of Regulations,

Volume 31, and Issue 17 on page 1012 on April20, 2015.

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance

ilwith the information provided in the public notice and the

State's laws and constitution, if applicable.

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response 7. N/ A, public notice of the opportunity to request a public

hearing was posted on the Virginia Register of Regulations,

Volume 31, Issue 17 on page 1012 on April20, 2015, but the

public didn't request a public hearing regarding this amendment

8. N/ A- No public comments were received. P' P'lereto.EPAREQUIREMENT--ISTATESUBMITTALI(X)TechnicalSuooortEPA REQUIREMENTSTATESUBMITTAL(X)I1.Identificationofallregulatedpollutantsaffectedbytheplan.1.ThisSIPpertainstoPM2.sattainmentandnonattainmentP"areas2.Identificationofthelocationsofaffectedsourcesincluding2.N/A.TheregulationamendmentscontainedinthisSIPP'EPAattainment/nonattainmentdesignationofthelocationsrevisionrequestareadministrativeinnature,anddonotimpose,andthestatusoftheattainmentplanfortheaffectedarea(s).anynewrequirements.3.Quantificationofthechangesinplanallowableemissions3.N/ATheamendmentscontainedinthisSIPrevisionrequestfromtheaffectedsources;estimatesofchangesincurrentareadministrative.actualemissionsfromaffectedsourcesor,whereappropriate,P"quantificationofchangesinactualemissionsfromaffectedsourcesthroughcalculationsofthedifferencesbetweencertainbaselinelevelsandallowableemissionsanticipatedasaresultoftherevision.4.TheState'sdemonstrationthatthenationalambientair4.N/Aqualitystandards,preventionofsignificantdeteriorationP''increments,reasonablefurtherprogressdemonstration,andvisibility,asapplicable,areprotectediftheplanisapprovedandimplemented.5.Modelinginformationrequiredtosupporttheproposed5.N/Aincludinginputdata,outputdata,modelsused,ambientmonitoringdataused,meteorologicaldataused,pforuseofoffsitedata(whereused),modesofmodelsused,assumptions,andotherinformationrelevanttolfuedeterminationofadequacyofthemodelinganalysis..6.Evidence,wherenecessary,thatemissionlimitationsare6.N/AP"basedoncontinuousemissionreductiontechnology.7.Evidencethattheplancontainsemissionlimitations,work7.N/Ap!Practicestandardsandrecordkeeping/reportingrequirements,

### - ---

-

- --

-- 

# EPA REQUIREMENT



# STATE SUBMITTAL

**(~)** 

# where necessary,

to ensure emission levels. 8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how

8. N/A



# pcompliance will be determined

in practice. 9. Special economic and technological justifications required 9.N/A , by any applicable EPA policies.
(If a policy

is not appropriate,



# p explain why.) 10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied

by a

10. N/A maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance

to the relevant



# p INAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation.