alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          17,240
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      7,254
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        104,060
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 186,704
<DEPOSITS>                                     163,907
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,180
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,018
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  19,617
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,419
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  103
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   100
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,622
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 885
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 914
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,708
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       75
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,520
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,619
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       939
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.47
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,386
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,379
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 4,114
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  5,535
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,812
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      268
<RECOVERIES>                                       102
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,721
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,721
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: irmy28@hotmail.com [mailto:irmy28@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:32 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Eileen Schulte 

9909 NE 1st St., #306 

Bellevue, WA 98004
#### § 237.55 Railroad bridge supervisors.

A railroad bridge supervisor shall be a person, regardless of position title, who is determined by the track owner to be technically competent to supervise the construction, modification or repair of a railroad bridge in conformance with common or particular specifications, plans and instructions applicable to the work to be performed, and to authorize or restrict the operation of railroad traffic over a bridge according to its immediate condition or state of repair.
```

[Federal Register: November 29, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 228)]
[Notices]               
[Page 73157]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29no10-150]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7247]

 
The Designation of Falah-i-Insaniat (and Other Aliases) as a 
Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of 
Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, 
and Executive Order 13372 of February 16, 2005, I hereby determine that 
the organization known as Falah-i-Insaniat (and other aliases) has 
committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism 
that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, 
foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``for those persons * * * determined to be subject to the 
order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States * * 
* prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this 
order would render these measures ineffectual,'' I determine that no 
prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to this 
determination who might have a constitutional presence in the United 
States, because to do so would render ineffectual the measures 
authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: September 28, 2010.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-29872 Filed 11-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
§ 232.611 Periodic maintenance. ( a ) In addition to the maintenance requirements contained in § 232.303(b) through (d), a freight car equipped with an ECP brake system shall be inspected and repaired before being released from a shop or repair track to ensure the proper and safe condition of the following: ( 1 ) ECP brake system wiring and brackets;
( 2 ) ECP brake system electrical connections; and
( 3 ) Car mounted ECP brake system components.
( b ) *Single car air brake test procedures.* Prior to placing a freight car equipped with an ECP brake system into revenue service, a railroad or a duly authorized representative of the railroad industry shall submit a procedure for conducting periodic single car air brake tests to FRA for its approval pursuant to § 232.17.
( c ) Except as provided in § 232.303(e), a single car air brake test conducted in accordance with the procedure submitted and approved in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section shall be performed by a qualified person on a freight car equipped with an ECP brake system whenever any of the events identified in § 232.305 occur, except for those paragraphs identified in paragraph (f) of this section.
( d ) A single car air brake test conducted in accordance with the procedure submitted and approved in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section shall be performed by a qualified person on each freight car retrofitted with a newly installed ECP brake system prior to placing or using the car in revenue service.
( e ) *Modification of single car test standard.* A railroad or a duly authorized representative of the railroad industry may seek modification of the single car test standard approved in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section. The request for modification will be handled and shall be submitted in accordance with the modification procedures contained in § 232.307.
( f ) *Exceptions.* A freight car equipped with a stand-alone or dual mode ECP brake system is excepted from the single car air brake test procedures contained in § 232.305(a). A freight car equipped with a stand-alone ECP brake system is excepted from the single car test requirements contained in § 232.305(b)(2).
( g ) For purposes of paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, if a single car air brake test is conducted on a car prior to June 15, 2009, pursuant to the then existing AAR standards, it shall be considered the last single car air brake test for that car, if necessary.
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 

Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0661 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Daniel Hill 

Address: 

OH, 45327 

Email: madhill2@verizon.net 

Phone: 937-696-2708 

General Comment 

On behalf of NAMI Dayton, I am writing to submit comments on the Interim Final Rules under the 

Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 and in 

doing so NAMI Dayton endorses the separate comments submitted by the Parity Implementation 

Coalition and the National Alliance on Mental Illness. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: May 03, 2010 

Received: April 30, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ae4b36 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 5/3/2010
#### Wieland v. Potter.

1. Appellate Pbactice — Abstbact.

A writ of error may be dismissed for a failure to comply with the rules of court respecting abstracts of the record.

2. Bill op Exceptions.

•A bill of exceptions must be authenticated by the signature and seal of the trial judge.

3. Same.

Without a bill of exceptions there can be no review of the judgment upon the evidence.

*Error to the District Court of Otero County.*

*452Mr. J. Hoffmire and Mr. T. K. Hoffmire, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.

Per Curiam.

We must again call the attention of the bar to the necessity of abstracting cases in accordance with the rules of court. In this case the abstract is not a decently full index. From it it is impossible to get an understanding as to the character and nature of the case. To inform the court at what folios of the record something can be found, although it may be of some,assistance, does not comply with the rules.

In this case there is another and more serious difficulty. There is no bill of exceptions.

The only certificate of what purports to be a bill of exceptions is that of some person who styles himself “ Official Stenographer.” It is needless to say that such a certificate is worthless and cannot be substituted for that of the judge.

The only question involved was as to the ownership of personal property, and that was entirely dependent upon the evidence.

Without a bill of exceptions, there is no basis for a review of the judgment.

The writ of error will be dismissed.

*Dismissed.*
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, October 18, 1995 (130), Para 130.12 Clerk to Correct Engrossment]
[Page 1547]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.130.12  clerk to correct engrossment

  On motion of Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That in the engrossment of the foregoing bill, the Clerk be 
authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, cross references, 
and to make other technical corrections.
```
#### § 220.45 Radio communication shall be complete.

Any radio communication which is not fully understood or completed in accordance with the requirements of this part and the operating rules of the railroad, shall not be acted upon and shall be treated as though not sent.
-----Original Message----- 

From: brendan.casey@comcast.net [mailto:brendan.casey@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:43 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Brendan Casey 

10812 SE 229th St. 

Kent, WA 98031
KATT Reaction Sch

Oxidation

Process

+ Other Reactants 

and Catalysts

IntendedReactionProducts

+
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           124,603
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       2,620
<MORTGAGE>                                         324
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 136,899
<CASH>                                           1,540
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               1,780
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          13,509
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 179,092
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 99,642
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 97,141
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           11,935
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           703
<OTHER-SE>                                    (53,837)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   179,092
<PREMIUMS>                                     105,968
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              9,287
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               2,105
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  12,184
<BENEFITS>                                      77,544
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      8,344
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            20,733
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,017)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (995)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,022)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,542)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.39)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
From: jlsgammato@comcast.net [mailto:jlsgammato@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:00 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lorna Sgammato 

9 Washington Street 

Plymouth, MA 02360
#### § 230.50 Time of testing.

All safety relief valves shall be tested, and adjusted if necessary, under steam at every 92 service day inspection, and also whenever any irregularity is reported.
§ 207.2 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Railroad police officer* means a peace officer who is commissioned in his or her state of legal residence or state of primary employment and directly employed by or contracted by a railroad to enforce state laws for the protection of railroad property, personnel, passengers, and/or cargo.
( b ) *Commissioned* means that a state official has certified or otherwise designated a railroad employee as qualified under the licensing requirements of that state to act as a railroad police officer in that state.
( c ) *Property* means rights-of-way, easements, appurtenant property, equipment, cargo, facilities, and buildings and other structures owned, leased, operated, maintained, or transported by a railroad.
[59 FR 6587, Feb. 11, 1994, as amended at 81 FR 88132, Dec. 7, 2016]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 8, 1995 (112), Para 112.13 Transportation Appropriations]
[Page 1321]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.112.13  transportation appropriations

  On motion of Mr. WOLF, by unanimous consent, the bill (H.R. 2002) 
making appropriations for the Department of Transportation and related 
agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other 
purposes; together with the amendments of the Senate thereto, was taken 
from the Speaker's table.
  When on motion of Mr. WOLF, it was,
  Resolved, That the House disagree to the amendments of the Senate and 
agree to the conference asked by the Senate on the disagreeing votes of 
the two Houses thereon.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69518-69519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28506]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7165]

Overseas Security Advisory Council (Osac) Renewal

    The Department of State has renewed the Charter of the Overseas 
Security Advisory Council. This advisory council will continue to 
interact on overseas security matters of mutual interest between the 
U.S. Government and the American private sector. The Council's 
initiatives and security publications provide a unique contribution to 
protecting American private sector interests abroad. The Under 
Secretary for Management has determined that the Council is necessary 
and in the public interest.
    The Council consists of representatives from four (4) U.S. 
Government agencies and thirty (30) American private sector companies 
and

[[Page 69519]]

organizations. The Council will follow the procedures prescribed by the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (Pub. L. 92-463). Meetings will 
be open to the public unless a determination is made in accordance with 
Section 10(d) of the FACA, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and (4), that a meeting 
or a portion of the meeting should be closed to the public. Notice of 
each meeting will be provided in the Federal Register at least 15 days 
prior to the meeting.
    For more information contact Marsha Thurman, Overseas Security 
Advisory Council, Bureau of Diplomatic Security, U.S. Department of 
State, Washington, DC 20522-2008, phone: 571-345-2214.

    Dated: October 15, 2010.
Jeffrey W. Culver,
Director of the Diplomatic Security Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-28506 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
```
Editorial Note on Part 98
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 98.33-11 Smoking. No person may smoke when— ( a ) Within 50 feet of a portable tank or IBC containing a combustible liquid; and
( b ) On the deck where the tank or IBC is stowed.
[CGD 84-043, 55 FR 37412, Sept. 11, 1990, as amended by USCG-2011-0088, 78 FR 54788, Sept. 6, 2013]
-----Original Message----- 

From: jsadek@comcast.net [mailto:jsadek@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:13 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I have very strong feelings about this issue: I am writing to support 

the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici 

Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 1210-AB30). 

I am a VA psychologist and thus would gain nothing personally from 

mental health parity in the private sector. However, it is clear not 

only from the movement in primary care models toward a "home clinic" 

that would involve several essential disciplines in a patient's primary 

care, including mental health. It is a model that the VA is widely 

adopting, and requires parity if mental health care is to be truly 

integrated into health care. 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Joseph Sadek 

8708 Sandwater Rd NW 

Albuquerque, NM 87120
-----Original Message----- 

From: victoria-g@juno.com [mailto:victoria-g@juno.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:08 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

 And the deductible needs to be a reasonable amount, not an everincreasing daunting amount! 

Sincerely, 

victoria galland 

103 Ardmore Rd 

Kensington, CA 94707
EX 10.27



August 28, 2001



PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

Mr. H. Mark Ennis
Senior Vice President
Boxmore International PLC
Ennis House, Enterprise Way
Newtownabbey BT364EW
NORTHERN IRELAND

Dear Mark:

This letter sets forth our understanding of the agreement we reached concerning your termination of employment from Boxmore International PLC.

As indicated in your letter dated August 21, 2001, you desire to terminate your employment and not continue in the position discussed with you.  You also indicated your desire to remain on Boxmore's payroll through April 6, 2002.

Chesapeake and Boxmore offered, and you accepted, to allow you to continue in your current role through December 31, 2001. Chesapeake and Boxmore further agree to allow you to continue on Boxmore's payroll as Director of Special Projects through April 8, 2002, which will be your effective date of termination.  At that time you will be entitled to three years Gross Remuneration as set forth in clause 19(a) of your Service Agreement.

Until April 8, 2002, you will be expected to perform your duties to the best of your ability and in Chesapeake and Boxmore's best interests in accordance with the terms

of your Service Agreement.  In addition, the terms of your Service Agreement that apply to you during and following your employment will continue in full force and effect.

Please indicate your agreement to the above by signing and returning the enclosed copy of this letter.

Sincerely,

/s/ John F. Gillespie						John F. Gillespie

:fwb

Enclosure

I have reviewed and agreed to the terms set forth in this letter



/s/ H. Mark EnnisH. Mark Ennis					Date: 8/30/01