alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 29, 1995 (123), Para 123.24 Raoul Wallenberg Memorial]
[Page 1491]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.123.24  raoul wallenberg memorial

  On motion of Mr. EHLERS, by unanimous consent, the Committee on House 
Oversight was discharged from further consideration of the following 
concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 94):

       Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
     concurring),

     SECTION 1. DEDICATION CEREMONY AND PLACEMENT OF A BUST OF 
                   RAOUL WALLENBERG IN THE CAPITOL.

       The rotunda of the Capitol may be used on November 2, 1995, 
     for a ceremony incident to the placement of a bust of Raoul 
     Wallenberg in the Capitol as previously authorized by 
     Congress.

     SEC. 2. SECURITY AND PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

       The Capitol Police Board shall take such action with 
     respect to security as may be necessary to carry out section 
     1. The Architect of the Capitol shall make appropriate 
     physical preparations for the ceremony referred to in section 
     1.

  When said concurrent resolution was considered and agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said concurrent resolution was 
agreed to was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
```
§ 219.401 Authorization for reasonable cause testing. ( a ) Each railroad may, at its own discretion, elect to conduct Federal reasonable cause testing authorized by this subpart. If a railroad chooses to do so, the railroad must use only Federal authority for all reasonable cause testing that meets the criteria of § 219.403. In addition, the railroad must notify its regulated employees of its decision to use Federal reasonable cause testing authority in the employee educational policy required by § 219.23(e)(5). The railroad must also provide written notification of its decision to FRA's Drug and Alcohol Program Manager, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590.
( b ) If a railroad elects to conduct reasonable cause testing under the authority of this subpart, the railroad may, under the conditions specified in this subpart, require any regulated employee, as a condition of employment in regulated service, to cooperate with breath or body fluid testing, or both, to determine compliance with §§ 219.101 and 219.102 or a railroad rule implementing the requirements of §§ 219.101 and 219.102. This authority is limited to testing after observations or events that occur during duty hours (including any period of overtime or emergency service). The provisions of this subpart apply only when, and to the extent that, the test in question is conducted in reliance upon the authority conferred by this section. A railroad may not require an employee to be tested under the authority of this subpart unless reasonable cause, as defined in this section, exists with respect to that employee.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 6, 1995 (74), Para 74.5 Subpoena]
[Page 823]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.74.5  subpoena

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, laid before the House a 
communication, which was read as follows:

         Office of the Chief Administrative Officer, House of 
           Representatives,
                                     Washington, DC, May 25, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     The Capitol,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Speaker: This is to formally notify you pursuant 
     to Rule L (50) of the Rules of the House that my office has 
     been served with two subpoenas issued by the Superior Court 
     of the District of Columbia.
       After consultation with the General Counsel, I have 
     determined that compliance with the subpoenas is consistent 
     with the privileges and precedents of the House.
           Sincerely,
                                                Scott M. Faulkner,
                                     Chief Administrative Officer.
```
#### Valentine Hendrickson, *Respondent, v.*Luciano Conterno, *Appellant.*

*—*Judgment of County Court affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41228 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EDUARDO MARMOLEJO-OCHOA, also known as Ignacio Medrano-Gutierrez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-171-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Eduardo Marmolejo-Ochoa raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)
 
 The undersigned, as the chief executive officer of PAB Bankshares, Inc., certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PAB Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.
 
 Dated this 10th day of May, 2004.
 
 
 */s/ Michael E. Ricketson*Michael E. Ricketson
President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 236.700 Definitions.

For the purpose of these rules, standards, and instructions, the following definitions will apply.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 24, 1995 (133), Para 133.6 Message from the Senate]
[Page 1572]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.133.6  message from the senate

  A message from the Senate by Mr. Lundregan, one of its clerks, 
announced that the Senate had passed with an amendment a bill of the 
House of the following title:

       H.R. 927. An Act to seek international sanctions against 
     the Castro government in Cuba, to plan for support of a 
     transition government leading to a democratically elected 
     government in Cuba, and for other purposes.

  The message also announced that the Senate has passed a bill of the 
following title, in which the concurrence of the House is requested:

       S. 1322. An Act to provide for the relocation of the United 
     States Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, and for other 
     purposes.
```
From: elrickey@q.com [mailto:elrickey@q.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:12 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Eleanor Weedon 

2749 E Balsam Dr 

Chandler, AZ 85286
Editorial Note on Subpart B of Part 216
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart B of part 216 appear at 64 FR 25659, May 12, 1999.

§ 216.11 Special notice for repairs—railroad freight car. ( a ) When an FRA Motive Power and Equipment Inspector or a State Equipment Inspector determines that a railroad freight car is not in conformity with the requirements of the FRA Freight Car Safety Standards set forth in part 215 of this chapter and that it is unsafe for further service, he notifies the railroad in writing that the car is not in serviceable condition. The Special Notice sets out and describes the defects that cause the car to be in unserviceable condition. After receipt of the Special Notice, the railroad shall remove the car from service until it is restored to serviceable condition. The car may not be deemed to be in serviceable condition until it complies with all applicable requirements of part 215 of this chapter.
( b ) The railroad shall notify the FRA Regional Administrator in writing when the equipment is returned to service, specifying the repairs completed.
( c ) A railroad freight car subject to the notice prescribed in paragraph (a) of this section may be moved from the place where it was found to be unsafe for further service to the nearest available point where the car can be repaired, if such movement is necessary to make such repairs. However, the movement is subject to the further restrictions of § 215.9 of this chapter.
[41 FR 18657, May 6, 1976, as amended at 41 FR 43153, Sept. 30, 1976]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2291 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2291

 To extend the Administrative Conference of the United States, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 8, 1995

  Mr. Gekas (for himself and Mr. Reed) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the Administrative Conference of the United States, and for 
                            other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    The first sentence of section 596 of title 5, United States Code, 
is amended to read as follows: ``There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out the purposes of this subchapter not more than 
$1,800,000 for fiscal year 1995, $1,800,000 for fiscal year 1996, 
$1,800,000 for fiscal year 1997, and $1,800,000 for fiscal year 
1998.''.

SEC. 2. MEMBERS' CAPACITY.

    Section 593(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding 
after and below paragraph (6) the following: ``The members appointed by 
the Chairman, with the approval of the Council, shall participate in 
the activities of the Conference solely as private individuals without 
official responsibility on behalf of the Government of the United 
States and, therefore, shall not be considered to hold an office of 
profit or trust for purposes of the eighth clause of section 9 of 
Article I of the Constitution.''.

SEC. 3. QUORUM.

    Section 595(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding 
after and below paragraph (2) the following: ``A majority of the 
members of the Conference shall constitute a quorum with regard to any 
final action taken under paragraph (1) or (2).''.

SEC. 4. CHAIRMAN'S COMPENSATION.

    (a) Executive Schedule Rate.--Section 593(b)(1) of title 5, United 
States Code, is amended by striking the period and the remainder of 
such section and inserting a semicolon and by adding after the matter 
added by section 2 the following: ``The Chairman shall be paid at the 
rate specified for level III of the Executive Schedule and may continue 
to serve until the Chairman's successor is appointed and has 
qualified.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 5314 of title 5, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``Chairman, Administrative Conference of the United 
                States.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-92138, 33-24714, 33-78442 and 333-42950) of BSB Bancorp, Inc. relating to the financial statements, of our report datedJanuary 25, 2002 which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

| /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS,  LLP |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                       |   |
| **Syracuse, N.Y. March 26, 2003**     |   |
|                                  |
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, September 12, 1995 (113), Para 113.32 Leave of Absence]
[Page 1329]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.113.32  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--
  To Ms. McKINNEY, for September 8;
  To Mr. SISISKY, for today and the balance of the week; and
  To Mr. TUCKER, for today and the balance of the week.
  And then,
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: uberflan@hotmail.com [mailto:uberflan@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:39 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Peter Becker 

111 Beebe Hill Rd 

Miltonboro, VT 05468
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v*Phillip Friedman, Appellant.

*People*v. *Friedman,*138 App. Div. 29, affirmed.

(Submitted January 5, 1911;

decided January 27, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered *592April 22, 1910, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the city of New York convicting the defendant of a violation of section 42 of the Sanitary Code of the city of New York in having upon his premises bad eggs to be used in human food.

*Nathan H. Stone*for appellant.

*Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly, Herman Stiefel*and *Harry S. Sullivan*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Werner, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ. Dissenting: Willard Bartlett, J.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
    for the period ended June 30, 2005, to which this
    Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the
    Periodic Report), fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|
| | 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                  





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ W. Douglas Parker  
| |                        
| | W. Douglas Parker      
| | Chief Executive Officer
|
| | /s/ Derek J. Kerr      
| |                        
| | Derek J. Kerr          
| | Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6767
CURTIS JEROME MCCRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusJIM TOWNLY, Superintendent; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-95-940-R) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 31, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis Jerome McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCray v. Townly , No. CA-95-940-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 9, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of cou nsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.53 General. Materials for pipe and components must be: ( a ) Able to maintain the structural integrity of the pipeline under temperature and other environmental conditions that may be anticipated;
( b ) Chemically compatible with any gas that they transport and with any other material in the pipeline with which they are in contact; and
( c ) Qualified in accordance with the applicable requirements of this subpart.
§ 214.529 In-service failure of primary braking system. ( a ) In the event of a total in-service failure of its primary braking system, an on-track roadway maintenance machine may be operated for the remainder of its tour of duty with the use of a secondary braking system or by coupling to another machine, if such operations may be done safely.
( b ) If the total in-service failure of an on-track roadway maintenance machine's primary braking system occurs where other equipment is not available for coupling, the machine may, if it is safe to do so, travel to a clearance or repair point where it shall be placed out of service until repaired.
Exhibit 10.1


    
      

    

     

     

    

      Exhibit
        10.1

      


      


      
        	
                Name

              	
                Bonus
                  Payment

              
	 	 
	
                David
                  Abrahamson

              	
                $35,000

              
	
                David
                  Buckel

              	
                $100,000

              
	
                Eric
                  Klinker

              	
                $50,000

              
	
                Robert
                  Smith

              	
                $20,000

              
	
                Eric
                  Suddith

              	
                $30,000
From: cfleitz@sbcglobal.net [mailto:cfleitz@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:53 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Carol Fleitz 

89 E. 39th Ave. #1 

San Mateo, CA 94403
-----Original Message----- 

From: erinrachael@comcast.net [mailto:erinrachael@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 3:34 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 02, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Erin Hoffman 

5675 Hickory Woods Ct 

Plainfield, IN 46168
-----Original Message----- 

From: weiden@frontiernet.net [mailto:weiden@frontiernet.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 9:41 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Maryann Weidenhammer 

1201 Rockville Pike 

Rockville, MD 20852