alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending March 23, 2013

|Filer                 | Filing Type      | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                              
|--------------------- | ---------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|CUSTOMERS BANK        | * Branch         | Customers Bank, Phoenixville, PA, to establish a branch office located at 99 Park Avenue, 15th Floor, Suite 1550, New York, NY.                                                                                                                                           | Newspaper:04/13/2013Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:            | 04/13/2013      
|Federal Register:     | Not applicable  
|SUNNYSIDE BANCORP INC | * SLHC Formation | Sunnyside Bancorp, Inc., Irvington, NY, to form a holding company by acquiring Sunnyside Federal Savings and Loan Association of Irvington, Irvington, NY, a federally chartered mutual savings and loan association converting to a federally chartered stock formation. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:04/19/2013 
|Newspaper:            | Not available   
|Federal Register:     | 04/19/2013      

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
-----Original Message----- 

From: carolgarvelink@aol.com [mailto:carolgarvelink@aol.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 7:36 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Carol Garvelink 

4697 Rivers Edge Drive 

Troy, MI 48098
Exhibit 31-1



Certification

I, Sara J. Burns, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of Central Maine Power Company for the year ended December 31, 2003;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  March 8, 2004 | /s/Sara J. Burns       Sara J. Burns
       President
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
§ 214.331 Definite train location. A roadway worker may establish on-track safety by using definite train location only where permitted by and in accordance with the following provisions: ( a ) A Class I railroad or a commuter railroad may only use definite train location to establish on-track safety at points where such procedures were in use on January 15, 1997.
( b ) Each Class I or commuter railroad shall include in its on-track safety program for approval by FRA in accordance with § 214.307 of this part a schedule for phase-out of the use of definite train location to establish on-track safety.
( c ) A railroad other than a Class I or commuter railroad may use definite train location to establish on-track safety on subdivisions only where: ( 1 ) Such procedures were in use on January 15, 1997, or
( 2 ) The number of trains operated on the subdivision does not exceed: ( i ) Three during any nine-hour period in which roadway workers are on duty, and
( ii ) Four during any twelve-hour period in which roadway workers are on duty.
( d ) Definite train location shall only be used to establish on-track safety according to the following provisions: ( 1 ) Definite train location information shall be issued only by the one train dispatcher who is designated to authorize train movements over the track for which the information is provided.
( 2 ) A definite train location list shall indicate all trains to be operated on the track for which the list is provided, during the time for which the list is effective.
( 3 ) Trains not shown on the definite train location list shall not be operated on the track for which the list is provided, during the time for which the list is effective, until each roadway worker to whom the list has been issued has been notified of the train movement, has acknowledged the notification to the train dispatcher, and has canceled the list. A list thus canceled shall then be invalid for on-track safety.
( 4 ) Definite train location shall not be used to establish on-track safety within the limits of a manual interlocking, or on track over which train movements are governed by a Traffic Control System or by a Manual Block System.
( 5 ) Roadway workers using definite train location for on-track safety shall not foul a track within ten minutes before the earliest time that a train is due to depart the last station at which time is shown in approach to the roadway worker's location nor until that train has passed the location of the roadway worker.
( 6 ) A railroad shall not permit a train to depart a location designated in a definite train location list before the time shown therein.
( 7 ) Each roadway worker who uses definite train location to establish on-track safety must be qualified on the relevant physical characteristics of the territory for which the train location information is provided.
( e ) Each on-track safety program that provides for the use of definite train location shall discontinue such use by June 12, 2017.
[61 FR 65976, Dec. 16, 1996, as amended at 81 FR 37889, June 10, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                         198,696
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,644
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     96,737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               328,097
<PP&E>                                          49,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 378,935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,973
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,035
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,809,594
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   378,935
<SALES>                                         97,883
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           28,859
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,769
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,210
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,985
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  3,985
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,210
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2293 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2293

  To establish audit authority in the Comptroller of the State of New 
             York over the Niagara Falls Bridge Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 8, 1995

 Mr. LaFalce introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To establish audit authority in the Comptroller of the State of New 
             York over the Niagara Falls Bridge Commission.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 6 of the 
joint resolution entitled ``Joint resolution creating the Niagara Falls 
Bridge Commission and authorizing said Commission and its successors to 
construct, maintain, and operate a bridge across the Niagara River at 
or near the city of Niagara Falls, New York'', approved June 16, 1938, 
as amended, is further amended by adding the following:
    ``The Commission may be audited by the Comptroller of the State of 
New York, at the Comptroller's discretion, under such conditions and 
procedures as may be prescribed by the Comptroller, and for this 
purpose the Comptroller shall have such access to all Commission 
records as is necessary to facilitate the audit.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted form the
Company's financial statements and is qualified in its intirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,025,562
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      3,479
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         102,413
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       221,259
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   8,331
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,361,044
<COMMON>                                        45,525
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      107,677
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            255,549
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 408,751
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,120
<PREFERRED>                                     11,336
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           120,897
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      245,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  34,219
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   15,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 519,721
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,361,044
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      456,245
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            27,729
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     349,706
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     377,435
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         78,810
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               2,295
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  81,105
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        28,586
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,519
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,117
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   50,402
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        35,266
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        9,100
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         117,776
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.18


</TABLE>
§ 214.525 Towing with on-track roadway maintenance machines or hi-rail vehicles. ( a ) When used to tow pushcars or other maintenance-of-way equipment, each on-track roadway maintenance machine or hi-rail vehicle shall be equipped with a towing bar or other coupling device that provides a safe and secure attachment.
( b ) An on-track roadway maintenance machine or hi-rail vehicle shall not be used to tow pushcars or other maintenance-of-way equipment if the towing would cause the machine or hi-rail vehicle to exceed the capabilities of its braking system. In determining the limit of the braking system, the employer must consider the track grade (slope), as well as the number and weight of pushcars or other equipment to be towed.
#### BRIDGET WELCH, Appellant, *v.*HARLAN D. PRESTON, and Others, Respondents.

*Appeal*— *settlement of case*— *right of the referee to malee additional findings upon the request of the parties*— *waiver of irregularity.*

Appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint herein, entered on the report of a referee.

This action was brought to compel the specific performance of a contract to convey certain real estate described in the complaint.

The court at General Term, after passing upon the merits of the *304appeal, said: “ It is suggested by tbe respondents’ counsel that tbe additional findings of the referee, made at the time of settling the case, cannot 'be considered on this appeal, as the present Code, which had taken effect previously, does not authorize findings to be made at that stage of an action. It is true there is no statutory authority for such findings, since the adoption of the Code of Civil Procedure, but it is competent for the parties to an appeal to agree upon a statement of facts on which the appeal shall be heard, and the same will be considered by the appellate court, if it 'appears to have been settled and signed by the referee or trial judge, in accordance with the rule. In this case each party appears to have requested the referee to make additional findings at the time of settling the case, and findings so made at the request of the appellant and respondents respectively, are contained in the appeal book. Even if the appellant alone had procured such findings to be made and inserted in the appeal book,.it would have been a mere irregularity, which the respondents might have been deemed to have waived by omitting to object at the time and to move to strike them from the appeal book, and bringing the case on for argument in its present shape.”

*M. M. Waters,*for the appellant.

*J. O.*Hunt, for the respondents.

Opinion by

Smith, P. L;

Hardin and Haight, JJ., concurred.

Judgment'reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, ' costs to abide event.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 159 (Friday, August 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 50054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20019]

[[Page 50054]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9010-6]

Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements Filed 08/05/2013 
Through 08/09/2013.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its 
comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.
EIS No. 20130236, Final EIS, NIH, MD, National Institute of Health 
Animal Center Master Plan, Review Period Ends: 09/16/2013, Contact: 
Valerie Nottingham 301-496-7775.
EIS No. 20130237, Final EIS, NMFS, NJ, FEIS Amendment 14 to the 
Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Fishery Management Plan, 
Review Period Ends: 10/14/2013, Contact: Aja Szumylo 978-281-9195.
EIS No. 20130238, Draft EIS, USACE, NC, Bogue Banks Coastal Storm 
Damage Reduction, Comment Period Ends: 09/30/2013, Contact: Eric Gasch 
910-251-4553.
EIS No. 20130239, Draft EIS, BLM, USFS, CO, Northwest Colorado Greater 
Sage-Grouse Draft Resource Management Plan Amendment, Comment Period 
Ends: 11/13/2013, Contact: Erin Jones 970-244-3008.

    The U.S. Department of the Interior's Bureau of Land Management and 
the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Forest Service are joint lead 
agencies for the above EIS.

EIS No. 20130240, Draft EIS, USA, AZ, PROGRAMMATIC--Yuma Proving Ground 
Activities and Operations, Comment Period Ends: 09/30/2013, Contact: 
Mr. Chuck Wullenjohn 928-328-6189.
EIS No. 20130241, Final EIS, USACE, FL, Tarmac King Road Limestone 
Mine, Review Period Ends: 09/16/2013, Contact: Edward Sarfert 850-439-
9533.
EIS No. 20130242, Final EIS, FHWA, IN, I-69 Evansville to Indianapolis, 
Indiana Project, Section 5, Bloomington to Martinsville, Contact: 
Michelle Allen 317- 226-7344.

    Under MAP-21 section 1319, FHWA has issued a single FEIS and ROD. 
Therefore, the 30-day wait/review period under NEPA does not apply to 
this action.

EIS No. 20130243, Draft EIS, FHWA, DE, US 113 North/South Millsboro 
South Area, Comment Period Ends: 10/04/2013, Contact: Nick Blendy 302-
734-2966.

    Dated: August 13, 2013.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2013-20019 Filed 8-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.507 Recordkeeping. Each operator shall maintain records that demonstrate compliance with this subpart. ( a ) Qualification records shall include: ( 1 ) Identification of qualified individual(s);
( 2 ) Identification of the covered tasks the individual is qualified to perform;
( 3 ) Date(s) of current qualification; and
( 4 ) Qualification method(s).
( b ) Records supporting an individual's current qualification shall be maintained while the individual is performing the covered task. Records of prior qualification and records of individuals no longer performing covered tasks shall be retained for a period of five years.
-----Original Message----- 

From: guysinger3@comcast.net [mailto:guysinger3@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:35 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Robert Geissinger 

9211 Skokomish Way NE #3 

Olympia, WA 98516
-----Original Message----- 

From: elisa@paonia.com [mailto:elisa@paonia.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:29 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Like any other health problem, if mental health issues are 

eftuntreated, they ony get worse and more expensive to treat. 

Sincerely, Elisa Greco 29672 Stingley Gulch Rd Hotchkiss, CO 81419 

Sincerely, 

Elisa Greco 

29672 Stingley Gulch Rd 

Hotchkiss, CO 81419