## FAA 333 UAS EXEMPTION PETITION Logan Alexander Mack August 11 , 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington DC 20590

Dear Sir or Madam,

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act) and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Logan Mack , operator of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“sUAS”) equipped to conduct aerial videography and photography for the motion picture, television, and commercial industry for closed set filming, hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) to allow commercial operation of its sUAS, so long as such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333. I hereby request exemption so that I may operate a DJI Inspire 1 that is under 7 pounds and operates on a frequency of 2.400-2.483GHz to provide services for profit, including aerial photography, aerial videography and cinematography, aerial filming and photography for real estate, aerial mapping, and aerial photography andvideography for special events to include but not limited to weddings, private or public parties/events, business advertisement(s), promotional events, environmental studies, and sports events as well as live feed video service for public events. Prior to each flight, the UAS will be inspected to ensure that it is in a condition safe for flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft will be grounded and prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground Control Station, controllers, monitors as well as the area of flight are to be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations must be properly

documented in the aircraft records. To continue to provide the best and safest service possible I will continue training using flight simulators as well as hands on training with said UAS in a controlled area and areas away from the public. Any other person or persons that may become an operator or (PIC) will train in this same

manner. I, Logan Mack , will be the initial sole operator of said UAS and will be the (PIC) for the entire duration of operation(s) of said UAS. I will not let any other person operate any UAS until they have reached a level ofcompetence to control and operate safely as well as being granted their own 333 exemption. Flight Operations above one hundred feet (100 ft.) will be avoided or minimized when possible when performed directly above any person(s). Operations will also be done in a (VLOS) manner at all times. The intent of my request is so that I may start a for profit business that provides aerial photography and videography to the general public and to private business. If required I can provide a copy or copies of my valid Drivers License or other documentation if required in order to complete the review and/or approval process of my request. As described more fully below, the requested exemption would permit the operation of small, unmanned and relatively inexpensive sUAS under controlled conditions in the NAS that is 1) limited 2) predetermined 3) controlled as to access. Approval of this exemption would thereby enhance safety and fulfill the Secretary of Transportation’s (the FAA Administrator’s) responsibilities to “...establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.” Section 333(c) of the Reform Act.

___________________________________________________The name and address of the applicant is: Logan Alexander Mack Tel: (215) 378-9697 Email: Logan.Mack.A@gmail.com Address: 3234 60th Street 2nd FL Woodside,NY 11377

___________________________________________________ Regulations from which the exemption is requested: 14 CFR Part 21 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b) 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b) 14 C.F.R. 91.7 (a) 14 CFR 91.9 (b) (2) 14 C.F.R. 91.103 14 C.F.R. 91.109 14 C.F. R. 91.119 14 C.F.R. 91.121 14 CFR 91.151 (a) 14 CFR 91.203 (a) & (b) 14 CFR 91.405 (a) 14 CFR 407 (a) (1) 14 CFR 409 (a) (2) 14 CFR 417 (a) & This exemption application is expressly submitted to fulfill Congress’ goal in passing Section 333(a) through (c) of the Reform Act. This law directs the Secretary of Transportation to consider whether certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system (NAS) before completion of the rule making required under Section 332 of the Reform Act. In making this determination, the Secretary is required to determine which types of sUAS do not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public or pose a threat to national security in light of the following: • The sUAS size, weight, speed, and operational capability;• Operation of the sUAS in close proximity to airports and populated areas • Operation of the sUAS within visual line of sight of the operator. Reform Act § 333 (a). Lastly, if the Secretary determines that such vehicles “may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft in the national airspace system.” Id. §333(c) (emphasis added). The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the FAA the authority to issue exemptions. This statutory authority by its terms includes exempting civil aircraft, as the term is defined under §40101 of the Act, that includes sUAS, from the requirement that all civil aircraft must have a current airworthiness certificate. The Administrator may grant an exemption from a requirement of a regulation prescribed under subsection (a) or (b) of this section or any sections 44702-44716 of this title if the Administrator finds the exemption in the public interest. 49 U.S.C. §44701(f) See also 49 USC §44711(a); 49 USC §44704; 14 CFR §91.203 (a) (1). Logan Mack owns a DJI Inspire 1 Professional sUAS rotorcraft, weighing 55 lbs. or less including payload. They operate, under normal conditions at a speed of no more than 50 knots and have the capability to hover, and move in the vertical and horizontal plane simultaneously. Theywill operate only in line of sight and will operate only within a predetermined and closed off property area under the permission of the property representative. Such operations will insure that the sUAS will “not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public. Such operations will insure that the sUAS will “not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public” as per the Reform Act Section 333 (b).

Given the small size of the sUAS involved and the restricted sterile environment within which they will operate, the applicant falls squarely within that zone of safety (an equivalent level of safety) in which Congress envisioned that the FAA must, by exemption, allow commercial operations of sUAS to commence immediately. Also due to the size of the sUAS and the restricted areas in which the relevant sUAS will operate, approval of the application presents no national security issue. Given the clear direction in Section 333 of the Reform Act, the authority contained in the Federal Aviation Act, as amended; the strong equivalent level of safety surrounding the proposed operations, and the significant public benefit, including enhanced safety, reduction in environmental impacts, including reduced emissions associated with allowing sUAS for movie and commercial videography operations, the grant of the requested exemptions is in thepublic interest. Accordingly, the applicant (Logan Mack ) respectfully requests that the FAA grant the requested exemption without delay. AIRCRAFT AND EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY The applicant proposes that the exemption requested herein apply to civil aircraft that have the characteristics and that operate with the limitations listed herein. These limitations provide for at least an equivalent or even higher level of safety to operations under the current regulatory structure because the proposed operations are conducted on closed off property under the permission of the property owner or property representative. These limitations and conditions to which Logan Mack agrees to be bound when conducting commercial operations under an FAA issued exemption include: 1.The sUAS will weigh less than 55 lbs. 2.Flights will be operated within line of sight of a pilot and/or observer. 3.Maximum total flight time for each operational flight will be 30 minutes. Flights will be terminated at 25% battery power reserve should that occur prior to the 30 minute limit. 4.Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet AGL or, not more than 200 feet above an elevated platform from which filming is planned.5.Minimum crew for each operation will consist of the sUAS Pilot, and the

Visual Observer. 6.sUAS Pilot will be Pilot in Command (PIC). If the PIC deems another operator to be qualified with the necessary skills to be PIC, that person can also be designated as PIC provided they have a minimum of 40 hours of flight time with the sUAS. 7.Flights will be operated at a lateral distance of at least 50 feet from any inhabited structures, buildings, vehicles, vessels, or people not associated with the operation or who have not signed a waiver in advance of the operation. 8.A briefing will be conducted in regard to the planned sUAS operations prior to each day’s production activities. It will be mandatory that all personnel involved with the operational duties of the flight within the boundaries of the safety perimeter be present for this briefing. 9. The operator will obtain the consent of all persons involved in the filming and ensure that only consenting persons will be allowed within 100 feet of the flight operation, and this radius may be reduced to 30 feet based upon an equivalent level of safety determination. With the advanced permission of the relevant FSDO, operations at closer range can be approved10. The operator will file an FAA Form 7711-1, or its equivalent, as modified in light of the requested exemption, with the Flight Standards District Office ("FSDO"). 11.Pilot and observer will have been trained in operation of sUAS generally and received up-to-date information on the particular sUAS to be operated. 12. The pilot, Logan Mack, has been flying RC multi-rotor systems

for 5 years and is considered to have advanced expertise on piloting, maintenance and safety concerns. 13.Observer and pilot will at all times be able to communicate by voice, radio, and/or text. 14.Written and/or oral permission from the relevant property holders or property representatives will be obtained. 15.All required permissions and permits will be obtained from territorial, state, county or city jurisdictions, including local law enforcement, fire, or other appropriate governmental agencies. 16.If the sUAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the sUAS will have the capability to return to a pre-determined location within the Security Perimeter and land autonomously. 17.The sUAS will have the capability to abort a flight in case of unpredictedobstacles, weather, or emergencies. 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H: Airworthiness Certificates 14 C.F.R. §91.203 Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, establishes the procedural requirements for the issuance of airworthiness certificates as required by FAR §91.203 (a) (1). Given the size and limited operating area associated with the aircraft to be utilized by the Applicant, an exemption from Part 21 Subpart H meets the requirements of an equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and Section 333 of the Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act (49 U.S.C.§44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act both authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an airworthiness certificate, upon consideration of the size, weight, speed, operational capability, and proximity to airports and populated areas of the particular sUAS. In all cases, an analysis of these criteria demonstrates that the sUAS operated without an airworthiness certificate, in the restricted environment and under the conditions proposed will be at least as safe, or safer, than a conventional aircraft (fixed wing or rotorcraft) operating with an airworthiness certificate without the restrictions and conditions proposed. The sUAS to be operated here under is less than 55 lbs. fully loaded, carries neither a pilot nor passenger, carries no explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and operates exclusively within a secured area. Unlike othercivil aircraft, operations under this exemption will be tightly controlled and monitored by both the operator and under the requirements and in compliance with local public safety requirements, to provide security for the area of operation as is now done with conventional filming. The FAA will have advance notice of all operations. These safety enhancements, which already apply to civil aircraft operated in connection with motion picture and television production, provide a greater degree of safety to the public and property owners than conventional operations conducted with airworthiness certificates issued under 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Lastly, application of

these same criteria demonstrates that there is no credible threat to national security posed by the sUAS, due to its size, speed of operation, location of operation, lack of explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and inability to carry a substantial external load. 14 C.F.R. § 45.23 (b). Marking of the Aircraft

The regulation requires: When marks include only the Roman capital letter "N" and the registration number is displayed on limited, restricted or light-sport category aircraft or experimental or provisionally certificated aircraft, the operator must also display on that aircraft near each entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station, in letters not less than 2 inches nor more than 6 inches high, thewords "limited," "restricted," "light-sport," "experimental," or "provisional," as applicable. Even though the sUAS will have no airworthiness certificate, an exemption may be needed as the sUAS will have no entrance to the cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which the word “Experimental” can be placed. Given the size of the sUAV, two-inch lettering will be impossible. The word “Experimental” will be placed on the fuselage in compliance with §45.29(f). The equivalent level of safety will be provided by having the sUAS marked on its fuselage as required by §45.29 (f) where the pilot, observer and others working with the sUAS will see the identification of the sUAS as “Experimental.” The FAA has issued the following exemptions to this regulation to Exemptions Nos. 10700, 8738, 10167 and

10167A. 14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) & (b): Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: Pilot

in Command. Sections 61.113 (a) & (b) limit private pilots to non-commercial operations . Because the sUAS will not carry a pilot or passengers, the proposed operations can achieve the equivalent level of safety of current operations by requiring the PIC operating the aircraft to have no less than 40 hours of flight time with the sUAS. Unlike a conventional aircraft that carries thepilot and passengers, the sUAS is remotely controlled with no living thing on board. The area of operation is controlled and restricted, and all flights are planned and coordinated in advance. 14 C.F.R. §91.7(a): Civil aircraft airworthiness. The regulation requires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in airworthy condition. As there will be no airworthiness certificate issued for the aircraft, should this exemption be granted, no FAA regulatory standard will exist for determining airworthiness. Given the size of the aircraft for maintenance and use of safety check lists prior to each flight, as set forth in Sections J, L and Q, an equivalent level of safety will be provided. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft. Section 91.9 (b) (2) provides: No person may operate a U.S.-registered civil

aircraft... (2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by §21.5 of this chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, or any combination there of. The sUAS, given its size and configuration has no ability or place to carry such a flight manual on the aircraft, not only because there is no pilot onboard, but because there is no room or capacity to carry such an item on the

aircraft. The equivalent level of safety will be maintained by keeping the flight manual at the ground control point where the pilot flying the sUAS will have immediate access to it. The FAA has issued the following exemptions to this regulation: Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, 10167A, 10602, 32827, and 10700. 14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight action This regulation requires each pilot in command to take certain actions before flight to insure the safety of flight. As FAA approved rotorcraft flight manuals will not be provided for the aircraft an exemption will be needed. The PIC will take all actions including reviewing weather, flight battery requirements, landing and takeoff distances and aircraft performance data before initiation of flight. 14 C.F.R. §91.109: Flight instruction: Section 91.103 provides that no person may operate a civil aircraft (except a manned free balloon) that is being used for flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully functioning dual controls. sUASs and remotely piloted aircraft, by their design do not have fully functional dual controls. Flight control is accomplished through the use of acontrol box that communicates with the aircraft viaradio communications. The FAA has approved exemptions for flight training without fully functional dual controls for a number of aircraft and for flight instruction in experimental aircraft. See Exemption Nos.5778K & 9862A. The equivalent level of safety provided by the fact that neither a pilot nor passengers will be carried in the aircraft and by the size and speed of the aircraft. 14 C.F.R. §91.119: Minimum safe altitudes Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Section 91.119 (d) allows helicopters to be operated at less than the minimums prescribed, provided the person operating the helicopter complies with any route or altitudes prescribed for helicopters by the FAA. As this exemption is for a sUAS that is a helicopter and the exemption requests authority to operate at altitudes up to 400 AGL, or not more than 200 above an elevated platform from which filming is planned, an exemption may be needed to allow such operations. As set forth herein, the sUAS will never operate at higher than 400 AGL with the exception that in circumstances where the sUAS is used to survey or photograph a structure whose height exceeds 400 feet AGL, the sUAS will not be operated more than 100' above the highest point on the structure. It will however be operated in a restricted area with security perimeter, where buildings and people will not be exposedto operations without their pre-obtained consent. The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, speed of the sUAS as well as the location where it is operated. No flight will be taken without the permission of the property owner or local officials. Because of the advance notice to the property owner and participants in the filming activity, all affected individuals will be aware of the planned flight operations. Compared to flight operations with aircraft or rotorcraft weighting far more than the maximum 55lbs. proposed herein and the lack of flammable fuel, any risk associated with these operations is far less than those presently presented with conventional aircraft operating at or below 500 AGL in the movie industry. In addition, the low-altitude operations of the sUAS will ensure separation between these small- UAS operations and the operations of conventional aircraft that must comply with Section91.119. 14 C.F.R. §91.121 Altimeter Settings This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by reference to an altimeter that is set “...to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.” As the sUAS may not have a barometric altimeter, but instead a GPS altitude read out, an exemption may be needed. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by the operator,pursuant to the safety check list and live flight data monitoring, confirming

the altitude of the launch site shown on the GPS altitude indicator before 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFRConditions Section 91.151 (a) prohibits an individual from beginning “a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising speed – (1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least

45 minutes.” The battery powering the sUAS provides approximately 30 minutes of powered flight. To meet the 30 minute reserve requirement in 14 CFR §91.151, sUAS flights would be limited to approximately 10 minutes in length. Given the limitations on the sUAS’s proposed flight area and the location of its proposed operations within a predetermined area, a longer time frame for flight in daylight or twilight VFR conditions is reasonable. Applicant believes that an exemption from 14 CFR §91.151(a) falls within the scope of prior exemptions. See Exemption 10673 (allowing Lockheed Martin Corporation to operate without compliance with FAR 91.151 (a)). Operating the small UAS, in a tightly controlled area where only people and property owners or official representatives who have signed waivers will beallowed, with less than 30 minutes of reserve fuel, does not engender the type of risks that Section 91.151(a) was intended to alleviate given the size and speed of the small UAS. Additionally, limiting sUAS flights to 10 minutes would greatly reduce the utility for which the exemption will be granted. Applicant believes that an equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limiting flights to 30 minutes or 25% of battery power— whichever happens first. This restriction would be more than adequate to return the sUAS to its planned landing zone from anywhere in its limited operating area. Similar exemptions have been granted to other operations, including Exemptions 2689F, 5745, 10673, and 10808. 14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) and (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and Registration The regulation provides in pertinent part: (a) Except as provided in § 91.715, no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it has within it the following: (1) An appropriate and current airworthiness certificate. . . . (b) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate required by paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued under §91.715 is displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that itis legible to passengers or crew. The sUAS fully loaded weighs no more than 55 lbs and is operated without an onboard pilot. As such, there is no ability or place to carry certification and registration documents or to display them on the sUAS. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by keeping these documents at the ground control point where the pilot flying the sUAS will have immediate access to them, to the extent they are applicable to the sUAS. The FAA has issued numerous exemptions to this regulation. A representative sample of other exceptions includes Exemption Nos. 9565, 9665, 9789, 9789A, 9797, 9797A, 9816A, and 10700. 14 C.F.R. §91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections These regulations require that an aircraft operator or owner “shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter...,” and others shall inspect or maintain the aircraft in compliance with Part43. Given that these section and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, these sections will not apply to the applicant. Maintenance will be accomplished by the operator pursuant to the flightmanual and operating handbook. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because these small UASs are very limited in size and will carry a small payload and operate only in restricted areas for limited periods of time. If mechanical issues arise the sUAS can land immediately and will be operating from no higher than 400 feet AGL. The operator will ensure that the sUAS is in working order prior to initiating flight, perform required maintenance, and keep a log of any maintenance performed. Moreover, the operator is the person most familiar with the aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition to provide the equivalent level of safety. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because maintenance and inspections will be performed in accordance with the sUAS Manufacturer's Manual, as referenced in the Aircraft OperationsManual. As provided in the Operations Manual, the operator will ensure that the sUAS is in working order prior to initiating flight and perform required maintenance needed.

Additional Views & Information: I have been directly involved in piloting RC vehicles for 5 years and have been a camera operator for the film/TV industry for 4 of those years. I’ve been working my way through the ranks of the TV industry in NYC and am seriously devoted and passionate about my craft. Safety is always my mainconcern as it’s always a priority when on set or location. I work in a highly professional manner and conduct my piloting skills with the utmost focus. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the Federal Register, should it be determined that publication

is needed: Applicant seeks an exemption from the following rules: 14 C.F.R. §21, subpart H; 14 C.F.R 45.23(b);14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113( a) & (b);91.7(a); 91.9 (b) (2);91.103(b);91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a);91.203(a) and (b); 91.405 (a); 91.407 (a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2); 91.409 (a) (2) and 91.417 (a) & (b) to operate commercially a small unmanned vehicle (55lbs or less) in motion picture, television, and commercial videography operations. Approval of exemptions allowing commercial operations of sUASs in the film industry will enhance safety by reducing risk. Conventional film operations, using jet or piston power aircraft, operate at extremely low altitudes just feet from the subject being filmed and in extreme proximity to people and structures; and present the risks associated with vehicles that weigh in the neighborhood of 4,000lbs., carrying large amounts of jet A or other fuel (140 gallons for jet helicopters.) Such aircraft must fly to and from the film location. In contrast, a sUAS weighing fewer than 55 lbs. and powered by batteries eliminates virtually all of that risk given the reducedmass and lack of combustible fuel carried on board. The sUAS is carried to the film set. The sUAS will carry no passengers or crew and, therefore, will not expose them to the risks associated with manned aircraft flights. The operation of small UASs, weighting less than 55 lbs., conducted in the strict conditions outlined above, will provide an equivalent level of safety supporting the grant of the exemptions requested herein, including exempting the applicant from the requirements of Part 21 and allowing commercial operations. These lightweight aircraft operate at slow speeds, close to the ground but under 400 feet AGL, and in a sterile environment and, as a result, are far safer than conventional flight operations conducted with turbine helicopters operating in close proximity to the ground and Privacy: All flights will occur over private or controlled access property with the property representative or owner’s prior consent and knowledge. Filming will be of people who have also consented to being filmed or otherwise have agreed to be in the area where filming will take place. All flights will occur in accordance with any state or local laws regarding privacy. Satisfaction of the criteria provided in Section 333 of the Reform Act of 2012--size, weight, speed, operating capabilities, proximity to airports andpopulated areas and operation within visual line of sight and national security – provide more than adequate justification for the grant of the requested exemptions allowing commercial operation of applicant’s sUAS in the motion picture, television, and commercial videography industry. Any questions or requests for additional information, please contact the undersigned at (215) 378-9697 or at Logan.Mack.A@gmail.com

Sincerely, Logan Mack

sUAS Pilot/Operator