alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TRE A-JXORNEY GENERAL 

OF T-EXAS 

Auwr~~.Tmt~s 787ll 

June 4, 1974 

The Honorable Clayton T. Garrison 

Executive Director 

Texas Parks & Wildlife Department 

John H. Reagan Building 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Opinion No. H- 318 

Re: ,Authority of Parks and 

Wildlife Department to 

issue private bird shooting 

area license. 

Dear Mr. Garrison: 

You ask whether the Parks and Wildlife Department is authorized 

to issue private bird shooting area licenses which will remain in effect 

from the date of issuance until the following August 31. 

Article 874a, Vernon’s Texas Penal Auxiliary Laws, was enacted 

by the 63rd Legislature in order to authorize the establishment of 

private bird shooting areas. Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., ch. 171, p. 386. A 

private bird shooting area is a tract of land of “not more than 300 contiguous acres on which privately owned or pen-reared game birds are 

banded and released to provide game bird shooting for all activities 

related to field dog competition and training and the sport of shooting, 

hunting or taking privately owned or pen-reared game birds. ” Section 2, 

Art. 874a. 

Before a private bird shooting area can be established, the owner 

must obtain a license from the Parks and Wildlife Department. He is 

then entitled to hold in captivity game birds for use on the area for 

which he is licensed. The boundaries of a private bird shooting area 

must be clearly marked, and all game birds released in the area must 

be banded so as to indicate the permit number of the licensee. The 

hunting season on a private bird shooting area runs from January 1 

through December 31 of each year, and only persons holding a valid 

Texas hunting license are permitted to hunt in such an area. 

While Art. 874a provides that the hunting season on a private bird 

shooting area is to run throughout the year, it makes no specific provision as to the duration of a private bird shooting area license. This 

p. 1471 
The Honorable Clayton T. Garrison, page 2 (H-318) 

matter is left to the discretion of the Parks and Wildlife Department. 

Under Art. 894, Vernon’s Texas Penal Auxiliary Laws, all hunting 

licenses issued by the Department are to remain in effect from the 

date of issuance until the last day of the following August. A similar 

duration is established for shooting resort and shooting preserve 

licenses under Art. 908, Vernon’s Texas Penal Auxiliary Laws. A 

private bird shooting area license is similar in nature to these licenses 

and in our opinion, the Parks and Wildlife Department is authorized, 

if it chooses to do so, to issue it on similar terms. Thus. the Parks 

and Wildlife Department is authorized to issue private bird shooting 

area licenses which will remain in effect from the date of issuance 

until the following August 31. 

SUMMARY 

The Parks and Wildlife Department is authorized, 

if it chooses to do so, to issue private bird shooting 

area licenses which will remain in effect from the date 

of issuance until the following August 31. 

y\ery truly yours. 

Attorney General of Texas 

G&y 

DAVID M. KENDALL, Chairman 

Opinion Committee 

p. 1472
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, September 18, 1995 (116), Para 116.12 Nuclear Agreement with North Korea]
[Page 1366]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.116.12  nuclear agreement with north korea

  Mr. BEREUTER moved to suspend the rules and pass the joint resolution 
(H.J.Res. 83) relating to the United States-North Korea Agreed Framework 
and the obligations of North Korea under that and previous agreements 
with respect to the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula and 
dialogue with the Republic of Korea; as amended.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. CLINGER, recognized Mr. BEREUTER and Mr. 
HAMILTON, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said joint resolution, as 
amended?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. CLINGER, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said joint resolution, as amended, was 
passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and 
said joint resolution, as amended, was passed was, by unanimous consent, 
laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
joint resolution.
```
#### Lucius Lawson, Respondent, v. The Town of Woodstock, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opiuion by

Landon, J.

Mem. by Learned, P. J., dissenting.
SEXUAL ASSAULT OF YOUNG CHILDREN AS REPORTED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT
NCJ 182990

Contents of zip archive
 
saycrl01.wk1      Table 1. Age profile of the victims of sexual assault
 
saycrl02.wk1      Table 2. Female proportion of sexual assault victims
 
saycrl03.wk1      Table 3. Proportion of sexual assault victims victimized alone
 
saycrl04.wk1      Table 4. Percent of sexual assault occurring within a residence
 
saycrl05.wk1      Table 5. Age profile of sexual assault offenders
 
saycrl06.wk1      Table 6. Victim-offender relationship in sexual assault
 
saycrl07.wk1      Table 7. Victim-offender relationship in sexual assault, by victim gender
 
saycrl08.wk1      Table 8. Offender probabilities in a typical 1,000 cases of sexual assault against
 
saycrl09.wk1      Table 9. Offender probabilities in a typical 1,000 cases of sexual assault against
 
saycrlf1.wk1      Figure 1.Age distribution of victims of sexual assault
 
saycrlf2.wk1      Figure 2.Age profiles of sexual assault victims, by offense category
 
saycrlf3.wk1      Figure 3.Female proportion of all sexual assault victims
 
saycrlf4.wk1      Figure 4.Age distribution of sexual assault victims, by gender
 
saycrlf5.wk1      Figure 5.Temporal distribution of sexual assault within victim age categories
 
saycrlf6.wk1      Figure 6.Age profile of sexual assault offenders
 
saycrlf7.wk1      Figure 7.Age profiles of sexual assault offenders within victim age categories
 
saycrlf8.wk1      Figure 8.Identified offenders arrested or cleared, by offender age
 
saycrlap.wk1      Figure A.Age distribution of offenders before and after smoothing
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 OMEGA FINANCIAL CORPORATION CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 This certification is intended to accompany Omega Financial Corporations (the Company)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and is given solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. I, Daniel L. Warfel, hereby certify in my capacity as the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Daniel L. WarfelDaniel L. WarfelChief Financial Officer
 Date: May 6, 2005 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. Page 25
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Foremost Corporation of America
Grand Rapids, Michigan

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated
February 14, 1997, relating to the consolidated financial statements and
schedules of Foremost Corporation of America appearing in the Company's annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, in that Corporation's
previously filed Form S-8 Registration Statements File No. 33-96692 and
33-96694.

BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
----------------
BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
March 26, 1997

Grand Rapids, Michigan
§ 177.843 Contamination of vehicles. ( a ) Each motor vehicle used for transporting Class 7 (radioactive) materials under exclusive use conditions in accordance with § 173.427(b)(4), § 173.427(c), or § 173.443(b) of this subchapter must be surveyed with radiation detection instruments after each use. A vehicle may not be returned to Class 7 (radioactive) materials exclusive use transport service, and then only for a subsequent exclusive use shipment utilizing the provisions of any of the paragraphs § 173.427(b)(4), § 173.427(c), or § 173.443(b), until the radiation dose rate at every accessible surface is 0.005 mSv/h (0.5 mrem/h) or less and the non-fixed contamination is not greater than the level prescribed in § 173.443(a) of this subchapter.
( b ) This section does not apply to any vehicle used solely for transporting Class 7 (radioactive) material if a survey of the interior surface shows that the radiation dose rate does not exceed 0.1 mSv per hour (10 mrem per hour) at the interior surface or 0.02 mSv per hour (2 mrem per hour) at 1 meter (3.3 feet) from any interior surface. These vehicles must be stenciled with the words “For Radioactive Materials Use Only” in lettering at least 7.6 cm (3 inches) high in a conspicuous place, on both sides of the exterior of the vehicle. These vehicles must be kept closed at all times other than loading and unloading.
( c ) In case of fire, accident, breakage, or unusual delay involving shipments of Class 7 (radioactive) material, see §§ 171.15, 171.16 and 177.854 of this subchapter.
( d ) Each transport vehicle used to transport Division 6.2 materials must be disinfected prior to reuse if a Division 6.2 material is released from its packaging during transportation. Disinfection may be by any means effective for neutralizing the material released.
[Amdt. 177-3, 33 FR 14933, Oct. 4, 1968, as amended by Amdt. 177-35, 41 FR 16131, Apr. 15, 1976; Amdt. 177-57, 48 FR 10247, Mar. 10, 1983; Amdt. 177-78, 55 FR 52712, Dec. 21, 1990; Amdt. 177-85, 60 FR 50335, Sept. 28, 1995; 63 FR 52850, Oct. 1, 1998; 65 FR 58631, Sept. 29, 2000; 67 FR 53142, Aug. 14, 2002; 75 FR 53597, Sept. 1, 2010; 79 FR 40618, July 11, 2014]
###### Editorial Note on Part 193

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

#### § 193.2161 Dikes, general.

An outer wall of a component served by an impounding system may not be used as a dike unless the outer wall is constructed of concrete.

[Amdt. 193-17, 65 FR 10959, Mar. 1, 2000]
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Fiscal year... annual report Sensors & automation. [electronic resource].
 
SuDoc:E10.21:SENS.AUT./
ItemNumber:0430-Q-08(online)
CGPsystem Number:000592791
 
2004
 
 **
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0001 

Request for Information Regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0222 

Comment on FR Doc # E9-9629 

Submitter Information 

Name: Randell L Elkins 

Address: 

34 Somerset Lane 

Cartersville, GA, 30121 

Email: RElkins@Harbinclinic.com 

Phone: 706-295-2028 

General Comment 

CMS-4140-NC 

I am private practice psychologists in Rome Georgia, and I provide EEG 

biofeedback treatment to patients with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and 

Mood Disorders. I write to advise you that our EEG biofeedback is an empirically 

validated and widely recognized effective nonmedication treatment for ADHD, as 

well as other conditions. There are over 50 studies evaluating the effectiveness of 

EEG biofeedback in the treatment of ADHD, substance use disorders, and 

autism. A recent review of this literature concluded “EEG biofeedback meets the 

American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry criteria for ” Clinical 

Guidelines “for treatment of ADHD.” Thus, EEG biofeedback meets the same 

criteria as to medication for treating ADHD, and EEG biofeedback “should always 

be considered as an intervention for this disorder by the clinician”. 

Unfortunately, EEG biofeedback has been denied by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, 

United Behavioral Health, Blue Cross, Cigna, and Amerigroup. They deny their 

patient pool an effective and validated treatment for a mental health problem. The 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: May 28, 2009 

Received: May 28, 2009 

Status: DoNotPost 

Tracking No. 809bba0c 

Comments Due: May 28, 2009

Submission Type: Web
reasons given by the insurance companies for this denial fall into two categories: 

1) the insurance company does not cover biofeedback or 2) there is not yet 

sufficient evidence for the efficacy of EEG biofeedback. As such, they demand 

evidence-based criteria which are far more restrictive for mental health services 

than is the case for medical/surgical services. 

I believe that the Parity bill regulations should require that employers and plans 

pay for a broad range services for mental health treatment as is the case for 

medical/surgical procedures. Plans should not be more restrictive in their 

managed care criteria for mental health disorders than they are for 

medical/surgical problems since that would be discriminatory. However, current 

insurance plans are clearly more restrictive in their demands for evidence-based 

mental health and substance abuse treatments when compared to medical 

surgical treatments.
#### Mary E. Schneider, Appellant, v. James H. Schneider, Respondent.

Order reversed, without costs and motion granted so far as to relieve appellants from payment of costs.
From: design@lefflandscape.com [mailto:design@lefflandscape.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:02 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Louise Leff 

504 Webster St. 

Petaluma, CA 94952
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 14, 2015 

# Order

July 14, 2015

151241 ( 20)(21 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v

JERRY WAYNE SMITH

, Defendant

- Appell ant

. SC: 151241

COA: 324637

Washtenaw CC: 78

- 012931

- FC

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion s of defendant

- appellant to extend the

time for filing his reply and to exceed the page limitation of the reply are GRANTED.

The 17

- page reply submitted on July 2, 2015 , is accepted for filing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CHIRON CORPORATIONSECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

In connection withthe periodic report of**CHIRON CORPORATION, aDelaware corporation** (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q forthe period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I,**HOWARDH. PIEN, Chief Executive Officer** of the Company, hereby certify asof the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)         the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)         the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

ThisCertification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with theSecurities and Exchange Commission.

| Date:    November 3, 2005 | By:      | /s/ HOWARD H.  PIEN            |
|------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------|
|                                     |     | **HOWARD  H. PIEN**            |
| * *                                 | * * | ***Chief  Executive Officer*** |

 

----
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00348

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF A.H. AND K.H.,

C HILDREN §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 322nd District Court

of Tarrant County ( 322

- 69 0431

- 20 )

January 18, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s termination order . It is ordered that the trial court ’ s

termina tion order is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
#### Michael Byrne, *Respondent, v.*The American Heating and Power Company, *Appellant.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.'
§ 236.1033 Communications and security requirements. ( a ) All wireless communications between the office, wayside, and onboard components in a PTC system shall provide cryptographic message integrity and authentication.
( b ) Cryptographic keys required under paragraph (a) of this section shall: ( 1 ) Use an algorithm approved by the National Institute of Standards (NIST) or a similarly recognized and FRA approved standards body;
( 2 ) Be distributed using manual or automated methods, or a combination of both; and
( 3 ) Be revoked: ( i ) If compromised by unauthorized disclosure of the cleartext key; or
( ii ) When the key algorithm reaches its lifespan as defined by the standards body responsible for approval of the algorithm.
( c ) The cleartext form of the cryptographic keys shall be protected from unauthorized disclosure, modification, or substitution, except during key entry when the cleartext keys and key components may be temporarily displayed to allow visual verification. When encrypted keys or key components are entered, the cryptographically protected cleartext key or key components shall not be displayed.
( d ) Access to cleartext keys shall be protected by a tamper resistant mechanism.
( e ) Each railroad electing to also provide cryptographic message confidentiality shall: ( 1 ) Comply with the same requirements for message integrity and authentication under this section; and
( 2 ) Only use keys meeting or exceeding the security strength required to protect the data as defined in the railroad's PTCSP and required under § 236.1013(a)(7).
( f ) Each railroad, or its vendor or supplier, shall have a prioritized service restoration and mitigation plan for scheduled and unscheduled interruptions of service. This plan shall be included in the PTCDP or PTCSP as required by §§ 236.1013 or 236.1015, as applicable, and made available to FRA upon request, without undue delay, for restoration of communication services that support PTC system services.
( g ) Each railroad may elect to impose more restrictive requirements than those in this section, consistent with interoperability requirements specified in the PTCSP for the system.
**Exhibit 31.4****CFO CERTIFICATIONS**I, Derek J. Kerr, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of America West Airlines, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 9, 2006         /s/ Derek J. Kerr   Name:  Derek J. Kerr   Title:  Chief Financial Officer