alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1334

PERRY BROWN, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

STATE OF MARYLAND; DEPUTY PATRICK H. HANDY, 

 Defendants – Appellees, 

 and 

JOHN DOE, 

 Defendant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District 

Judge. (8:07-cv-01956-PJM) 

Submitted: January 8, 2010 Decided: January 22, 2010 

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Perry Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Corlie McCormick, Jr., David 

Reid Moore, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, 

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

2 
3 

PER CURIAM: 

Perry Brown appeals the district court’s final order 

of judgment entered after a jury returned a defense verdict in 

Brown’s civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Brown v. Maryland, 

No. 8:07-cv-01956-PJM (D. Md. Feb. 23, 2009). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         550,117
<SECURITIES>                                 6,268,448
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,154,229
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,970
<INVENTORY>                                    932,084
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,057,304
<PP&E>                                       4,183,855
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,708,163
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,785,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          866,357
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    375,000
<COMMON>                                       144,020
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,399,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,785,326
<SALES>                                      1,758,999
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,765,812
<CGS>                                        1,166,843
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,166,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,153,541
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (465,026)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (167,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (298,026)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (298,026)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: argeljl@dhfs.state.wi.us [mailto:argeljl@dhfs.state.wi.us] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:32 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jennifer Argelander 

1715 Erie Court 

Madison,, WI 53704
United States Department of State 

Bureau of Oceans and International
 

Environmental and Scientific Affairs
 

Washington, D.C. 20520 

March 1, 2013 

Subject: Keystone XL Project – Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement 

To: All interested parties 

On March 1st, the U.S. Department of State (the Department) released a Draft Supplemental 

Environmental Impact Statement (Draft SEIS) for the proposed Keystone XL Project based on the 

application submitted by TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP (Keystone) on May 4, 2012. 

The Draft SEIS is available for download from the Department’s Keystone XL project website 

(http://www.keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov). Further updates and other related information will also be 

available on this website. A paper copy and CD of the Draft SEIS are available for viewing at public 

libraries along the proposed route. 

Once the Draft SEIS is noticed in the Federal Register, a 45-day comment period will begin. As part of 

the Department's process, members of the public, public agencies, and other interested parties are 

encouraged to submit comments, questions, and concerns about the project via e-mail to 

keystonecomments@state.gov, at http://www.keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov, or mailed to: 

U.S. Department of State 

Attn: Genevieve Walker, NEPA Coordinator 

2201 C Street NW, Room 2726 

Washington, D.C. 20520 

After the end of the public comment period, the Department will prepare a Final SEIS. 

Ultimately, a determination will be made on whether this project serves the national interest. The 

national interest determination will involve consideration of many factors, including: energy security; 

environmental, cultural, and economic impacts; foreign policy; and compliance with relevant federal 

regulations. As directed by Executive Order 13337, before making such a decision, the Department 

will also request the views of several agencies and officials, including: the Departments of Defense, 
Page 2 

03/01/13 

Justice, Interior, Commerce, Transportation, Energy, Homeland Security, and the Environmental 

Protection Agency. 

Sincerely, 

Genevieve Walker 

NEPA Coordinator 

U.S. Department of State 

Telephone: 202-647-9798
-----Original Message----- 

From: lindacbird@gmail.com [mailto:lindacbird@gmail.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:56 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Linda Bird 

181 Honeysuckle Creek Loop 

Mooresville, NC 28117
§ 180.517 Reporting and record retention requirements. ( a ) *Certification and representation.* Each owner of a specification tank car must retain the certificate of construction (AAR Form 4-2) and related papers certifying that the manufacture of the specification tank car identified in the documents is in accordance with the applicable specification. The builder's signature on the certificate of construction and the marking of the tank car with the tank specification is the representation that all of the appropriate inspections and tests were successfully performed to qualify the tank for use. The owner must retain the documents throughout the period of ownership of the specification tank car and for one year thereafter. Upon a change of ownership, the applicable provisions prescribed in Section 1.3.15 of the AAR Specifications for Tank Cars (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter) apply. The builder of the car or a facility performing work on the car may retain copies of relevant records.
( b ) *Inspection and test reporting.* Each tank car that is inspected and tested as specified in § 180.509 must have a written report, in English, prepared according to this paragraph. Marking the tank car with the specification (or retaining the specification marking on the tank) is the representation that all of the appropriate inspections and tests were performed and the results meet the tank car owner's acceptance criteria to qualify the car for continued use. The report may be created and retained electronically, but, upon request by FRA for a copy of the report, it must be made available in common readable form. The owner must retain a copy of the inspection and test reports until successfully completing the next inspection and test of the same type. The inspection and test report must include the following: ( 1 ) Type of inspection and test performed (a checklist is acceptable);
( 2 ) The results of each inspection and test performed;
( 3 ) Tank car reporting mark and number;
( 4 ) Tank car specification;
( 5 ) Inspection and test date (month and year);
( 6 ) Location and description of defects found and method used to repair each defect;
( 7 ) The name and address of the tank car facility and the name and signature of inspector; and
( 8 ) The unique code (station stencil) identifying the facility.
[Amdt. 180-2, 54 FR 25032, June 12, 1989, as amended at 68 FR 75765, Dec. 31, 2003; 77 FR 37991, June 25, 2012]
§ 210.3 Applicability. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the provisions of this part apply to the total sound emitted by moving rail cars and locomotives (including the sound produced by refrigeration and air conditioning units that are an integral element of such equipment), active retarders, switcher locomotives, car coupling operations, and load cell test stands, operated by a railroad as defined in 45 U.S.C. 22, under the conditions described in this part and in 40 CFR part 201.
( b ) The provisions of this part do not apply to— ( 1 ) Steam locomotives;
( 2 ) Street, suburban, or interurban electric railways unless operated as a part of the general railroad system of transportation;
( 3 ) Sound emitted by warning devices, such as horns, whistles, or bells when operated for the purpose of safety;
( 4 ) Special purpose equipment that may be located on or operated from rail cars;
( 5 ) As prescribed in 40 CFR 201.10, the provisions of 40 CFR 201.11 (a) and (b) and (c) do not apply to gas turbinepowered locomotives or any locomotive type that cannot be connected by any standard method to a load cell; or
( 6 ) Inert retarders.
[48 FR 56758, Dec. 23, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 33228, Aug. 14, 1989]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                         946,566
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,849,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,399,890
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,838
<PP&E>                                       6,016,989
<DEPRECIATION>                                  75,943
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,602,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          177,830
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,424,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,602,450
<SALES>                                        267,029
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               397,869
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  121,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                80,405
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                196,252
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            196,252
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   196,252
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 6, 1995 (110), Para 110.27 Memorials]
[Page 1308]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.110.27  memorials

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, memorials were presented and referred as 
follows:

       155. By the SPEAKER: Memorial of the House of 
     Representatives of the State of Alabama, relative to 
     expressing opposition to Congress of pending bills to reduce 
     benefits for coal miners; to the Committee on Economic and 
     Educational Opportunities.
       156. Also, memorial of the House of Representatives of the 
     Commonwealth of the Mariana Islands, relative to expressing 
     the support of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
     Islands for the Republic of China to regain admission to the 
     United Nations General Assembly; to the Committee on 
     International Relations.
       157. Also, memorial of the House of Representatives of the 
     State of Maine, relative to memorializing the Congress of the 
     United States to recognize U.S. Merchant Marine veterans of 
     World War II with full veteran status; to the Committee on 
     Veterans' Affairs.
```
EXHIBIT  32

MAMMATECH
CORPORATIONCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mammatech Corporation (the Company)
on  Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended November 30, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Henry S.
Pennypacker,  President and Chief Executive Officer and Mary Bailey Sellers, Treasurer
and Chief  Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of 1934; and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the
financial  condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:     February
8, 2006

| | By:     /s/
Henry S. PennypackerHenry S. PennypackerTitle:     President,
Chief Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/      Mary
Bailey SellersMary Bailey SellersTitle:     Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This
certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
#### The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, *Respondent, v.*Alexander T. Arthur and another, *Appellants.*

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs. Opinion, by

Daniels, J.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsUser's guide to PANCOR: A panel method program for interference assessment in slotted-wall wind tunnelsGuidelines are presented for use of the computer program PANCOR to assess the interference due to tunnel walls and model support in a slotted wind tunnel test section at subsonic speeds. Input data requirements are described in detail and program output and general program usage are described. The program is written for effective automatic vectorization on a CDC CYBER 200 class vector processing system.Document ID19910006720Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsKemp, William B., Jr.*(Vigyan Research Associates, Inc. Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1990Subject CategoryResearch And Support Facilities (Air)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:187479NASA-CR-187479Accession Number91N16033Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-59-54-01CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18585Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910006720.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, John P. Gorst, Chief Executive Officer of Gottaplay Interactive Inc.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-KSB of Gottaplay
   Interactive. Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
   material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
   statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
   were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
   the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer
   as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the issuer and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
   controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
   material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated
   subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
   particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and
   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
   period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over
   financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report
   that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
   the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
   most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
   issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors
   (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
   operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
   likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize
   and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over
   financial reporting.


Date: January 14, 2008

/s/ John P. Gorst
Name:  John P. Gorst
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.505 Strength test requirements for steel pipeline to operate at a hoop stress of 30 percent or more of SMYS. ( a ) Except for service lines, each segment of a steel pipeline that is to operate at a hoop stress of 30 percent or more of SMYS must be strength tested in accordance with this section to substantiate the proposed maximum allowable operating pressure. In addition, in a Class 1 or Class 2 location, if there is a building intended for human occupancy within 300 feet (91 meters) of a pipeline, a hydrostatic test must be conducted to a test pressure of at least 125 percent of maximum operating pressure on that segment of the pipeline within 300 feet (91 meters) of such a building, but in no event may the test section be less than 600 feet (183 meters) unless the length of the newly installed or relocated pipe is less than 600 feet (183 meters). However, if the buildings are evacuated while the hoop stress exceeds 50 percent of SMYS, air or inert gas may be used as the test medium.
( b ) In a Class 1 or Class 2 location, each compressor station regulator station, and measuring station, must be tested to at least Class 3 location test requirements.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, the strength test must be conducted by mai ntaining the pressure at or above the test pressure for at least 8 hours.
( d ) For fabricated units and short sections of pipe, for which a post installation test is impractical, a preinstallation strength test must be conducted by maintaining the pressure at or above the test pressure for at least 4 hours.
[35 FR 13257, Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37504, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32895, June 14, 2004; Amdt. 195-94, 69 FR 54592, Sept. 9, 2004; Amdt. 192-120, 80 FR 12779, Mar. 11, 2015; 86 FR 2241, Jan. 11, 2021]