alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 52003XC1204(04) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52003XC1204(04)

**Commission communication amending the notice to the Member States of 14 April 2000 laying down guidelines for the Community Initiative for rural development (Leader+) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal C 294 , 04/12/2003 P. 0011 - 0011 *

Commission communication amending the notice to the Member States of 14 April 2000 laying down guidelines for the Community Initiative for rural development (Leader+)

(2000/C 139/05)

(2003/C 294/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

The notice to the Member States of 14 April 2000 laying down guidelines for the Community initiative for rural development (Leader+)(1) is hereby amended as follows:

The second indent of point 18, entitled "Transnational cooperation" is replaced by the following:

"In the context of transnational cooperation between Member States, in addition to territories selected under Leader+, cooperation may also be opened up to areas selected under Leader I and II or to other rural areas organised according to the Leader approach and recognised by the Member State. Only operations involving territories selected under Leader+ will be eligible for Community part-financing. However, expenditure on organising activities will be eligible in all the areas concerned.

Where a territory selected under Leader+ enters into a cooperation project under the terms of this action with an area outside the Community organised according to the Leader approach, associated expenditure relating to the Leader+ area will be eligible."

(1) OJ C 139, 18.5.2000, p. 5.
-----Original Message----- 

From: mgross16@nyc.rr.com [mailto:mgross16@nyc.rr.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:52 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Michael Gross 

35-32 210th St. 

Bayside, NY 11361
-----Original Message----- 

From: touhee999@yahoo.com [mailto:touhee999@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 4:20 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Gail Uecker 

16130 Oak Park Ave. 

Tinley Park, IL 60477
Skip navigation and go straight to page content.

# National Aeronautics and Space Administration

## Goddard Space Flight Center

- Home
- In the Classrooom
- Just Ask
- Other Good Places
- Other Languages

# Welcome to Starchild

### Level 1

Solar System

Universe

Space Stuff

Glossary

### Level 2

Solar System

Universe

Space Stuff

Glossary

StarChild is a learning center for young astronomers ages 5-13 to learn about the solar system, the Milky Way galaxy, and the universe beyond. Use the links above to explore the site's topics. If you are looking for something a bit more advanced (ages 14+), then head on over to Imagine the Universe!

HEASARCAstrophysics Science Division (ASD)NASAGSFC

          - The StarChild Team
          - Graphics & Music Acknowledgments
          - Project Leader:  Dr. Laura A. Whitlock
          - Curator:  J.D. Myers
          - NASA Official: Amber Straughn

          - Privacy Policy & Important Notices
          - Contact NASA
          - Page Last Updated: Mon, May 14, 2018
p130060.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0060

Focus Ready Draft 11/29/2012

ENGINEER: Avcin \ JAS

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

USE: Chemical intermediate for a Ziegler-Natta

polymerization catalyst.

OTHER USES: Analogs and are used as

polymerization catalysts. Analog is used as a

Ziegler-Natta catalyst for polybutadiene polymerization.

MSDS: No Label: No

TLV/PEL:

no information provided.

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (11/20/2012):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox Related Cases: .

Migration to groundwater: Hyd Pdt neodecanoic acid - negl

// Hyd Pdt - negl // Hyd Pdt - negl.

PBT rating: P1B1T2 PMN: P1B1T2 // Hyd Pdt P1B1T2

. Health: 2-3 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 8 ppb.)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 0-1

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

Page 1
p130060.eng

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

Page 2
p130060.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0060

Manufacturing: 

 

Days/yr: 50

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

Water or Incineration or Landfill

Conservative: 1.8E+0 kg/site-day over 50 days/yr from 

RELEASE TOTAL

9.0E+1 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 0

Basis:

Inhalation:

Not expected, per submission.

Dermal:

Not expected, per submission.

Page 3
p130060.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0060

Use: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 

 Days/yr: 250

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

Water or Incineration or Landfill

Conservative: 7.2E-1 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 

 

RELEASE TOTAL

1.8E+2 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 0

Basis:

Inhalation:

Not expected, per submission.

Dermal:

Not expected, per submission.



Page 4
p130060.eng

-

Page 5
-----Original Message----- 

From: snowdogslife@yahoo.com [mailto:snowdogslife@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 5:13 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Deborah Noah 

5175 N Fresno St, Apt 116 

Fresno, CA 93710
Exhibit 14

**CHURCH LOANS & INVESTMENTS TRUST**

**CODE OF ETHICS FOR OFFICERS**

In my role as an officer of Church Loans & Investments Trust (the “Trust”), I hereby certify that I adhere to and advocate the following principles and responsibilities governing my professional and ethical conduct.

To the best of my knowledge and ability:

| 1. | I will, at all times, act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of interest in regard to my dealings with or on behalf of the Trust;                                                                                                                   |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | I will, at all times, provide my fellow officers, superiors, the Board of Trust Managers, independent auditors of the Trust, legal counsel for the Trust, and shareholders with information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant, timely and understandable;            |
| 3. | I will, at all times, comply with applicable rules and regulations of federal, state and local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies;                                                                                                          |
| 4. | I will, at all times, act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, confidence and diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or relying on my independent judgment to be subordinated or compromised;                                                                     |
| 5. | I will, at all times, respect the confidential information acquired in the course of my work, except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to disclose same and will never use confidential information acquired in the course of my work for personal advantage or gain; |
| 6. | I will, at all times, promote ethical behavior among others in my work environment, including fellow employees of the Trust, its Trust Managers, and those persons in which I may come in contact with when acting on behalf of the Trust; and                                     |
| 7. | I will, at all times, exercise the utmost care and responsibility in the use of and control over assets and resources of the Trust which are employed by or entrusted to me.                                                                                                       |

Signed this 23rd day of June, 2004.

 

|   |   |      |
|--------|--------|-----------|
|        |   | By:  | Kelly Archer, President and CEORobert Fowler, Vice-President-AccountingRobert Martin, Vice-President-LendingJoshua Shields, Vice-President |
|   |   |      |   |
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHAWN KELLY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. JON MENNEN, Sgt.,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 22

- 15697

D.C. No. 2:21

- cv
- 01880

- JJT

- ESW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2023 * *

Before: FERNANDEZ, FRIEDLAND, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. Arizona state prisoner Shawn Kelly appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo

. Byrd v. Marico pa County Bd. of Supervisors , 845 F.3d 919, 922 (9th Cir. 2017) ( dismissal of an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 24 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 22

- 15697

action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) ); Pouncil v. Tilton , 704 F.3d 568, 574 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal of an action as time

- barred)

. We vacate and remand

. The district court concluded that Kelly’s action was time

- barred because Kelly did not file it within the applicable statute of limitations. However, Kelly alleged in his second amended complaint that he was unable to file timely because he was prevented from accessing necessary legal files, despite his diligence in pursuing them. T he district court failed to consider whether Kelly sufficiently allege d a basis for equitable tolling or whether he could amend to do so

. See Soto

v. Sweetman , 882 F.3d 865, 8 71 (9th Cir. 2018) (“Federal courts in § 1983 actions apply the state statute of limitations from personal

- injury claims and borrow the state’s tolling rules.”); Supermail Cargo, Inc. v. United States , 68 F.3d 1204,

1206

- 0 7 (9th Cir. 1995) (explaining that complaints may be dismissed as time

barred only if “ it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts

that would establish the timeliness of the claim ” and the factual and legal issues are clear enough to allow the court to “determine with certainty whether the [equitable tolling] doctrine could be successfully invoked” ); Nolde v. Frankie , 964 P.2d 477,

480 ( Ariz. 1998) (en banc) (explaining that Arizona recognizes equitable exceptions to statute s of limitations “when necessa ry to prevent injustice”).

We therefore vacate and remand for the district court to consider, in the first
instance, whether the allegations in Kelly’s second amended complaint are3 22

- 15697

sufficient to invoke equitable tolling, and if not, whether Kelly should be granted

further leave to amend

. We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 ( 9th Cir. 2009).

VACATED and REMANDED.
-----Original Message----- 

From: cynthia@rabbithilldesigns.com 

[mailto:cynthia@rabbithilldesigns.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 10:37 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 29, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Cynthia Boyer 

1548 Santa Paula Avenue 

San Jose, CA 95110
§ 22.51 Loan closings. ( a ) The Participating Lender must promptly close all STLP loans in accordance with the terms and conditions approved by DOT OSDBU in its Guarantee Agreement. The Participating Lender must report circumstances concerning any STLP loans not closed within a reasonable time period after DOT OSDBU approval.
( b ) The Participating Lender uses its own internal loan closing documents and must use standard banking practices and procedures to ensure proper execution of the debt and perfection of the collateral. The Participating Lender must forward copies of all executed closing documents and filings to DOT OSDBU within the time period specified in the cooperative agreement.
§ 212.107 Certification. ( a ) *Scope.* In the event the FRA and the State agency do not agree on terms for the participation of the State under § 212.105 of this part and the State wishes to engage in investigative and surveillance activities with respect to any rule, regulation, order, or standard issued under the authority of the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970, the State shall file an annual certification with respect to such activities.
( b ) *Content.* The annual certification shall be filed not less than 60 days before the beginning of the Federal fiscal year to which it applies, shall contain the information required by § 212.105(e) of this part and, in addition, shall certify that: ( 1 ) The State agency has the authority and capability to conduct investigative and surveillance activities under the requirements of this part with respect to each rule, regulation, order or standard for which certification is submitted; and
( 2 ) The State agency will, at a minimum, conduct planned compliance inspections meeting the level of effort prescribed in the applicable appendix to this part.
( c ) *Action on certification.* The Associate Administrator responds to the filing of an annual certification within 60 days of its receipt by accepting it or by rejecting it for cause stated.
( d ) *Delegation of authority.* Acceptance of an annual certification constitutes a delegation of authority to conduct investigative and surveillance activities only to the extent that the delegation is carried out through personnel recognized by the State and the FRA (pursuant to subpart C of this part) to be qualified to perform the particular investigative and surveillance activities to which the personnel are assigned.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2130-0509)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6793
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM HAZEL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (2:92-cr-00163-1; 3:05-cv-00611-REP) Submitted: September 22, 2006 Decided: October 26, 2006 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Hazel, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: William Hazel, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order construing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and dismissing it as successive. Although Hazel alternatively sought, and received, transfer of his § 2241 petition from the District of Kansas, his place of confinement, to the Eastern District of Virginia, the sentencing court, Hazel states that he intended to file a § 2241 petition raising a challenge to the manner in which his sentence was calculated. Judicial review of a § 2241 petition must be sought in the district of confinement rather than the sentencing court. In re: Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 333 (4th Cir. 2000). In cases such as this one, where relief pursuant to § 2241 is sought in the sentencing court, the court is without jurisdiction to consider the request. On this basis, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of Hazel’s § 2241 petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
-----Original Message----- 

From: james.rosson@ttuhsc.edu [mailto:james.rosson@ttuhsc.edu] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:17 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

james rosson 

1806 80th 

lubbock, TX 79423
1

Damberg, Rich

From: Brachtl, Megan

Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 5:21 PM

To: Szabo, Aaron

Cc: Ling, Michael; Damberg, Rich; Frey, Nathan J.

Subject: RE: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO 12866 and 13563 PM 2.5 Implementation 

rule NPRM

Attachments: EPA Response to Interagency Comments on RIN 2060-AQ48 PM2.5 NAAQS Impl rule 

NPRM 01-23-15.pdf

Importance: High

Aaron – Attached please find EPA’s responses to interagency comments on the draft Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for

the PM2.5 NAAQS State Implementation Plan (SIP) Requirements.

We look forward to hearing from you on next steps and timing. Thanks for your assistance with this rulemaking.

Best regards,

Megan

Megan V. Brachtl, Group Leader

State and Local Programs Group

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

(919) 541‐2648

brachtl.megan@epa.gov

From: Szabo, Aaron [mailto:Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov]  

Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 1:13 PM

To: Brachtl, Megan

Cc: Ling, Michael; Damberg, Rich; Frey, Nathan J.

Subject: RE: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO 12866 and 13563 PM 2.5 Implementation rule NPRM

Megan,

I wanted to follow up on the email Nathan sent on December 19, 2014, that included the summary of interagency

comments under EO 12866 and 13563 on EPA’s PM.25 Implementation rule NPRM.  I was wondering if you had a

general time‐frame when you thought that OMB would receive EPA’s responses.  If you have already sent them to OMB,

if you can resend them and include Nathan Frey and myself, I would greatly appreciate it.  Thank you very much and

please let me know if you have any questions.

Aaron L. Szabo

Policy Analyst

Office of Management and Budget

202‐395‐3621

Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
2

From: Frey, Nathan J.  

Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 2:18 PM

To: Brachtl, Megan

Cc: Ling, Michael; Damberg, Rich; Szabo, Aaron

Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO 12866 and 13563 PM 2.5 Implementation rule NPRM

Attached please find a summary of interagency comments under EO 12866 and 13563 on the EPA proposed rule

entitled, Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards: State Implementation Plan Requirements.

Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions.

Best,

Nathan
-----Original Message----- 

From: tklists@gmail.com [mailto:tklists@gmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 2:27 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Taylor Kanoles 

500 South Dunton Ave. 

Arlington Heights, IL 60005