alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: alisaw@earthlink.net [mailto:alisaw@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:39 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Alisa Willens-Davis 

2350 Vista Grande Terrace 

Vista, CA 92084
-----Original Message----- 

From: heypeni@att.net [mailto:heypeni@att.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 3:31 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

discriminating against people with 

mental,cognitive or emotional disabilities is not only unfair it is 

poor policiy - people are unable to get the help needed and we all 

suffer the consequences 

Sincerely, 

Peni Hall Hall 

2951 Derby St #138 

Berkeley, CA 94705
###### Editorial Note on Part 195

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.124 Closures.

Each closure to be installed in a pipeline system must comply with the 2007 ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) (Section VIII, Division 1) (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3) and must have pressure and temperature ratings at least equal to those of the pipe to which the closure is attached.

[Amdt. 195-99, 80 FR 186, Jan. 5, 2015]
The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge 1

for the Eastern District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-3585

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Edward Earl Wright, also known * Eastern District of Missouri.

as James Hill, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: February 4, 1997

 Filed: February 14, 1997

___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Edward Earl Wright appeals the sentence imposed by the

district court after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute 1

cocaine base and distributing more than 50 grams of cocaine base,

in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. We affirm.

Wright’s presentence report indicated a Guidelines sentencing

range of 360 months to life, noting that a 120-month mandatoryminimum penalty was applicable. At sentencing, the government

moved for a downward departure under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines
-2-

Manual § 5K1.1, p.s. (1995). The district court departed and
-3-

sentenced Wright to 180 months imprisonment and five years

supervised release, stating the mandatory minimum was not a severe

enough penalty given Wright's criminal history and the nature of

the offense. 

On appeal, Wright contends the court erred in not departing

further and not imposing the mandatory minimum. We may not review

the extent of the court’s downward departure, however, regardless

of its reasons for not departing further. See United States v.

Dutcher, 8 F.3d 11, 12 (8th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
James Adair Above Ground Aero, LLC 120 Teachers Row Richmond Hill, GA 31324 abovegroundaero@gmail.com
U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 October 28, 2015 Please find the emailed Motion Picture and Television Flight Operations Manual for Above Ground Aero, LLC. I would like to add it to my current Section 333 exemptions request to allowfor closed-set filming on docket FAA-2015-5142-0001. All other requests for exemption are unchanged. All operations will be based on rules described in the approved exemption, the MPTOFM, and any applicable FARs. The manual is proprietary to Above Ground Aero, LLC and request that it not be released to the public. Regards,

James Adair Above Ground Aero, LLC
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 27, 1995 (103), Para 103.39 Deletions of Sponsors from Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1214]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.103.39  deletions of sponsors from public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were deleted from public bills 
and resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 2092: Mr. Bryant of Tennessee.
```
Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the “Reform Act”) and 14

CFR Part 11, Richard Devine, operator of an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS), hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) to allow commercial operation of its UAS, so long as such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333.

Commercial operation of an UAS, as described herei n, which are equipped with camera(s) and sensors, would operate in the following manner:

1. Aerial photography and/or video for public and/or private use including real estate, architecture, land surveying, engineering and other related professional activities. 2. Aerial video and/or photography for public and/or private use including television, public events, cinematography and news gathering. 3. Aerial inspection/photography of residential/commercial structures under contract with the owners or
loc al government authority. 4. Aerial inspection/photography of residential/commercial utility infrastructure. 5. Aerial video/photography or providing live video feed to assist with search and rescue operations in cases of an emergency or natural disaster on ly when the local authorities or government has requested it by contract or donation.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     Each of the undersigned officers and/or directors of Superconductive
Components, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the "Company"), hereby appoints Daniel
Rooney and Curtis A. Loveland as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact,
or any of them individually with power to act without the other, as his or her
true and lawful attorney-in-fact, in his or her name and on his or her behalf,
and in any and all capacities stated below, to sign and to cause to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, and any and all amendments
thereto, hereby granting unto said attorneys, and to each of them, full power
and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in
any and all such capacities, every act and thing whatsoever necessary to be done
in and about the premises as fully as each of the undersigned could or might do
in person, hereby granting to each such attorney full power of substitution and
revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such attorney or his substitute
may do by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Power of Attorney in
counterparts if necessary, effective as of March 10, 2006.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
              Signature                                   Title
              ---------                                   -----
<S>                                     <C>


/s/ Daniel Rooney                       President, Chief Executive Officer and
-------------------------------------   Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Daniel Rooney                           Director (principal executive officer)


/s/ Gerald S. Blaskie                   Vice President and Chief Financial
-------------------------------------   Officer (principal financial officer and
Gerald S. Blaskie                       principal accounting officer)


/s/ Robert H. Peitz                     Director
-------------------------------------
Robert H. Peitz


/s/ Walter J. Doyle                     Director
-------------------------------------
Walter J. Doyle


/s/ Robert J. Baker, Jr.                Director
-------------------------------------
Robert J. Baker, Jr.


/s/ Edward W. Ungar                     Director
-------------------------------------
Edward W. Ungar
</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00114-CR

Ricardo Hely Rivas

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From County Criminal Court No. 5

of Tarrant County (1194775)

May 12, 2016

Per Curiam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                        
<MULTIPLIER>                  1                 
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars                
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998           
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998     
<PERIOD-END>                   APR-04-1998     
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1     
<CASH>                              615,125    
<SECURITIES>                              0     
<RECEIVABLES>                       926,169    
<ALLOWANCES>                         31,160    
<INVENTORY>                       1,169,656          
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  2,754,277    
<PP&E>                            4,773,166    
<DEPRECIATION>                    3,402,111    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    5,227,717    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1,181,933    
<BONDS>                                   0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0    
<PREFERRED>                         375,000    
<COMMON>                            144,361    
<OTHER-SE>                        3,526,423    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      5,227,717    
<SALES>                           1,483,555    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  1,483,555    
<CGS>                               890,090    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       890,090    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  1,087,596    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           0    
<INCOME-TAX>                              0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (482,590)    
<DISCONTINUED>                            0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0    
<CHANGES>                                 0    
<NET-INCOME>                       (482,590)    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (.17)   
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.17)        
        

</TABLE>
H. R. 2161

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

An Act

To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act of 1994 until

October 1, 1995, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 583(a) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103–

236), as amended by Public Law 104–17, is amended by striking

‘‘August 15, 1995,’’ and inserting ‘‘October 1, 1995,’’. (b) CONSULTATION.—For purposes of any exercise of the author- ity provided in section 583(a) of the Foreign Relations Authorization

Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103–236) prior to

August 16, 1995, the written policy justification dated June 1,

1995, and submitted to the Congress in accordance with section

583(b)(1) of such Act, and the consultations associated with such

policy justification, shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements

of section 583(b)(1) of such Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2227 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2227

 To prohibit defense contractors from being reimbursed by the Federal 
          Government for certain environmental response costs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 4, 1995

 Mrs. Maloney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit defense contractors from being reimbursed by the Federal 
          Government for certain environmental response costs.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON REIMBURSEMENT OF DEFENSE CONTRACTORS FOR 
              ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE COSTS.

    (a) Prohibition.--Section 2324(e)(1) of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(P) Costs of any claim for environmental response costs 
        at any facility owned or operated by the contractor or at which 
        the contractor is liable in whole or in part for the 
        environmental response action. For purposes of this 
        subparagraph, the terms `facility' and `response' have the 
        meaning given such terms by paragraphs (9) and (25), 
        respectively, of section 101 of the Comprehensive Environmental 
        Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 
        9601(9) and (25)).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subparagraph (P) of section 2324(e)(1) of 
title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply 
to contracts in existence on the date of the enactment of this Act and 
contracts entered into after such date.
                                 <all>
```
-',

'

..-' STATEOF WASHINGTON 

### DEPART/VlENT OF ECOLOGY P.O. BOX47600 • Olympia, Washington 98504-7600 • (206) 459-6000 January 12, 1993

Mr. Gerald A. Emison, Acting Regional Administrator 

## u.s. EPA, Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue 

### MIS SO-141 Seattle, WA 98101 Dear Mr. Emison: 

# o Re: RCRA corrective Action Authorization The Washington state Department of EcoJogy (Ecology) is pleased to provide the enclosed application fbr**f~deral** authorization of our RCRA corrective action program.**~SQmplete** copy of the application has concurrently been provided to Mike Gearheard of your staff. Ecology is proud to have developed an innovative corrective action program under the alternative authorities initiative. I understand that both our agencies have devoted considerable resources to development and coordination of the application. C I trust our mutual investment will speed the authorization process. Ecology looks forward to implementation of a RCRA corrective action program consistent with existing statelMTCA cleanup goals and authorities. Please contact Tom Eaton, of my staff, at (206) 407-6702 if you have any questions or comments regarding the application.

.



# -e Sincerely, 

# YTJ/l,.f-C/;C/'/it

## td-rLt'L Mary Riveland Director
,', 

### ':MR: EM:cc Enclosure 

# fD)

# rn@

# rnOWrg

# rm**~1** .IAN 

## 1 3 1994 

# IlJJ
WASTEMANAGEMENTBRANCH
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0824

DCN CBM00657 

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
§ 23.35 What role do business development and mentor-protégé programs have in the DBE program? ( a ) An owner whose PNW exceeds $2,047,000 is not presumed economically disadvantaged.
( b ) The Department will adjust the PNW cap by May 9, 2027 by multiplying $1,600,000 by the growth in total household net worth since 2019 as described by “Financial Accounts of the United States: Balance Sheet of Households (Supplementary Table B.101.h)” produced by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve (*https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/*), and normalized by the total number of households as collected by the Census in “Families and Living Arrangements” (*https://www.census.gov/topics/families/families-and-households.html*) to account for population growth. The Department will adjust the PNW cap every 3 years on the anniversary of the adjustment date described in this section. The Department will post the adjustments on the Departmental Office of Civil Rights' web page, available at *https://www.Transportation.gov/DBEPNW .* Each such adjustment will become the currently applicable PNW limit for purposes of this regulation.
( c ) The Department will use formula 1 to this paragraph (c) to adjust the PNW limit:

Formula 1 to Paragraph (c)

[89 FR 55088, July 3, 2024]
-----Original Message----- 

From: threetiara@mac.com [mailto:threetiara@mac.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:23 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Delmar Spangler 

94 East Brookline St. #1 

Boston, MA 02118
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20105 Conference Calendar

TED LAWRENCE ROBERTSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus THE CITY OF SUGAR LAND; THE SUGAR LAND POLICE DEPARTMENT; THERON RUNNELS, Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-95-CV-188

- - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ted Lawrence Robertson appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as barred by the relevant statute of limitations. Robertson’s original complaint, which he filed on January 19, 1995, alleged that on February 8, 1992, the defendants unlawfully arrested him, falsely imprisoned him, and illegally searched his home, car, truck, and person, therebyNo. 96-20105 - 2 - violating his civil rights. The limitations period for filing suit on Robertson’s claims began to run on February 8, 1992, and ended on February 9, 1994. See Rodriguez v. Holmes , 963 F.2d 799, 803 (5th Cir. 1992). The district court did not err by dismissing Robertson’s § 1983 action as barred by the statute of limitations. Robertson’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.
AFFIRMED.
#### § 230.84 Sanders.

Steam locomotives shall be equipped with operable sanders that deposit sand on the rail head in front of a set of driving wheels. Sanders shall be tested at the beginning of each day the locomotive is used.
# E C 

# / R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

501 Eastowne Drive, Suite 25 0  Chapel Hill, North Carolina 2751 4 Telephone: (919) 484

- 0222  Fax: (919) 484

- 0122 

## CONTACT REPORT

Date/Time Project Name Project Number

August 24 , 20 1 1 3 : 30 p m Ferroalloys RTR MME

- 4 11

EC/R Originator Contact Phone Number

Bradley Nelson Bob Wewer

– ADA Environmental

Solutions ( 888 ) 822

- 8617

General Subje ct

The purpose of the telephone call was to discuss mercury control options for an electric arc furnace equipped with a wet scrubber. M r

. Wewer stated that activated carbon injection systems using a brominated or non

- brominated carbon are effective at r emoving mercury from the exhaust gas stream. He suggested based on the current configuration, that an activated carbon injection system be installed after the scrubber with a wet ESP system to capture the used carbon. He believes this would provide effec tive mercury removal with the smallest impact on the existing system.
-----Original Message----- 

From: cocoandsam@yahoo.com [mailto:cocoandsam@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:37 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Berton Nordberg 

8227 Norton Ave Apt 3 

West Hollywood, CA 90046
§ 178.255-6 Loading and unloading accessories. ( a ) When installed, gauging, loading and air inlet devices, including their valves, shall be provided with adequate means for their secure closure; and means shall also be provided for the closing of pipe connections of valves.
( b ) Interior heater coils, if installed, must be of extra heavy pipe and so constructed that breaking off of exterior connections will not cause leakage of tanks.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2203 Received in Senate (RDS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2203

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 19, 1995

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To reauthorize the tied aid credit program of the Export-Import Bank of 
  the United States, and to allow the Export-Import Bank to conduct a 
                         demonstration project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIED AID CREDIT PROGRAM.

    (a) Section 10(c)(2) of the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 (12 
U.S.C. 635i-3(c)(2)) is amended by striking ``1995'' and inserting 
``1997''.
    (b) Section 10(e) of the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 (12 U.S.C. 
635i-3(e)) is amended by striking the first sentence and inserting the 
following: ``There are authorized to be appropriated to the Fund such 
sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal years 1996 and 1997.''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT.

    Notwithstanding section 4701(a)(1)(A) of title 5, United States 
Code, the Export-Import Bank of the United States may conduct a 
demonstration project in accordance with section 4703 of such title.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 19, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```