9518 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

Stat. 1330–232, 1330–236 (42 U.S.C. 

10162(b), 10168(c), (d)). Section 72.46 also 

issued under sec. 189, 68 Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C. 

2239); sec. 134, Pub. L. 97–425, 96 Stat. 2230 

(42 U.S.C. 10154). Section 72.96(d) also 

issued under sec. 145(g), Pub. L. 100–203, 

101 Stat. 1330–235 (42 U.S.C. 10165(g)). 

Subpart J also issued under secs. 2(2), 2(15), 

2(19), 117(a), 141(h), Pub. L. 97–425, 96 Stat. 

2202, 2203, 2204, 2222, 2244 (42 U.S.C. 

10101, 10137(a), 10161(h)). Subparts K and L 

are also issued under sec. 133, 98 Stat. 2230 

(42 U.S.C. 10153) and sec. 218(a), 96 Stat. 

2252 (42 U.S.C. 10198). 

■ 2. In § 72.214, Certificate of 

Compliance 1014 is revised to read as 

follows: 

§ 72.214 List of approved spent fuel 

storage casks. 

* * * * * 

Certificate No.: 1014. 

Initial Certificate Effective Date: May 31, 

2000. 

Amendment Number 1 Effective Date: 

July 15, 2002. 

Amendment Number 2 Effective Date: 

June 7, 2005. 

Amendment Number 3 Effective Date: 

May 29, 2007. 

Amendment Number 4 Effective Date: 

January 8, 2008. 

Amendment Number 5 Effective Date: 

July 14, 2008. 

Amendment Number 6 Effective Date: 

August 17, 2009. 

Amendment Number 7 Effective Date: 

December 28, 2009. 

Amendment Number 8 Effective Date: 

May 2, 2012. 

SAR Submitted by: Holtec International. 

SAR Title: Final Safety Analysis Report 

for the HI–STORM 100 Cask System. 

Docket Number: 72–1014. 

Certificate Expiration Date: May 31, 

2020. 

Model Number: HI–STORM 100. 

* * * * * 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day 

of January, 2012. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

R.W. Borchardt, 

Executive Director for Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–3678 Filed 2–16–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2011–0725; Directorate 

Identifier 2011–NM–065–AD; Amendment 

39–16943; AD 2012–03–02] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

The Boeing Company Model 767–200, 

–300, and –300F series airplanes. This 

AD was prompted by reports of loss of 

avionics cooling due to an unserviceable 

relay installed on a panel as part of the 

cabin air conditioning and temperature 

control system (CACTCS). This AD 

requires doing certain wiring changes, 

installing a new relay and necessary 

wiring in the CACTCS, and performing 

an operational test of the cooling pack 

system. We are issuing this AD to 

prevent loss of electrical equipment bay 

cooling and the overheating of flight 

deck instruments, which would result 

in the eventual loss of primary flight 

displays, an unusually high pilot 

workload, and depressurization of the 

cabin. 

DATES: This AD is effective March 23, 

2012. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of certain publications listed in the AD 

as of March 23, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: For service information 

identified in this AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data 

& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, 

MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124– 

2207; telephone 206–544–5000, 

extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; email: 

me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet 

https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You 

may review copies of the referenced 

service information at the FAA, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. 

For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 425–227– 

1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility between 

9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The address for the 

Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is 

Document Management Facility, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ana 

Martinez Hueto, Aerospace Engineer, 

Cabin Safety and Environmental 

Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 

98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6592; fax: 

425–917–6590; email: 

ana.m.hueto@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 to include an AD that would 

apply to the specified products. That 

NPRM published in the Federal 

Register on August 24, 2011 (76 FR 

52899). That NPRM proposed to require 

doing certain wiring changes, installing 

a new relay and necessary wiring in the 

CACTCS, and performing an operational 

test of the cooling pack system. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. We 

have considered the comments received. 

Boeing supports the NPRM (76 FR 

52899, August 24, 2011). American 

Airlines stated that it is not affected by 

the NPRM. 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the relevant data, 

considered the comments received, and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting the AD 

as proposed except for minor editorial 

changes. We have determined that these 

minor changes: 

• Are consistent with the intent that 

was proposed in the NPRM (76 FR 

52899, August 24, 2011) for correcting 

the unsafe condition; and 

• Do not add any additional burden 

upon the public than was already 

proposed in the NPRM (76 FR 52899, 

August 24, 2011). 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD affects 35 

airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We estimate the following costs to 

comply with this AD: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 9519 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Cost on U.S. 

operators 

Change wire bundle, install relay, and operational test.29 work-hours × $85 per hour = $2,465 per 

relay installation.

$1,240 $3,705 $129,675 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

This AD will not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This AD will not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

the DOT Regulatory Policies and 

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 

1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

2012–03–02 The Boeing Company: 

Amendment 39–16943; Docket No. 

FAA–2011–0725; Directorate Identifier 

2011–NM–065–AD. 

(a) Effective Date 

This AD is effective March 23, 2012. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to The Boeing Company 

Model 767–200 and –300 series airplanes, 

certificated in any category, as identified in 

Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 

767–21–0246, dated January 7, 2011; and 

Model 767–300F series airplanes, certificated 

in any category, as identified in Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 767–21– 

0234, dated August 6, 2009. 

(d) Subject 

Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/ 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of America 

Code 21: Air conditioning. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD results from reports of loss of 

avionics cooling due to an unserviceable 

relay installed on a panel as part of the cabin 

air conditioning and temperature control 

system (CACTCS). We are issuing this AD to 

prevent loss of electrical equipment bay 

cooling and the overheating of flight deck 

instruments, which would result in the 

eventual loss of primary flight displays, an 

unusually high pilot workload, and 

depressurization of the cabin. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Installation of New Relay and Wiring 

Bundle 

Within 72 months after the effective date 

of this AD: Change the wire bundle route and 

wiring, install a new relay and applicable 

wiring in the CACTCS, and do an operational 

test of the cooling pack system, in accordance 

with the Accomplishment Instructions of the 

service information specified in paragraph 

(g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, as applicable. 

(1) For Model 767–200 and 767–300 series 

airplanes: Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 767–21–0246, dated January 7, 2011. 

(2) For Model 767–300F series airplanes: 

Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 

767–21–0234, dated August 6, 2009. 

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in the 

Related Information section of this AD. 

Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. 

(i) Related Information 

For more information about this AD, 

contact Ana Martinez Hueto, Aerospace 

Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental 

Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle 

Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 

phone 425–917–6592; fax 425–917–6590; 

email: ana.m.hueto@faa.gov. 

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) You must use the following service 

information to do the actions required by this 

AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The 

Director of the Federal Register approved the 

incorporation by reference (IBR) of the 

following service information under 5 U.S.C. 

552(a) and 1 CFR part 51: 

(i) Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 767–21–0246, dated January 7, 2011. 

(ii) Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 767–21–0234, dated August 6, 2009. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, 

Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone 

206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766– 

5680; email me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet 

https://www.myboeingfleet.com. 

(3) You may review copies of the 

referenced service information at the FAA, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

9520 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(4) You may also review copies of the 

service information that is incorporated by 

reference at the National Archives and 

Records Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go 

to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/ 

cfr/ibr-locations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 

26, 2012. 

Kalene C. Yanamura, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2012–2973 Filed 2–16–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2011–1092; Directorate 

Identifier 2011–NM–111–AD; Amendment 

39–16946; AD 2012–03–05] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier 

Inc., Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

Bombardier, Inc. Model BD–700–1A10 

and BD–700–1A11 airplanes. This AD 

was prompted by a report of 

deformation at the neck of the pressure 

regulator body on certain oxygen 

cylinder and regulator assemblies 

(CRA). This AD requires an inspection 

to determine if a certain oxygen CRA is 

installed and the replacement of oxygen 

CRAs containing pressure regulators 

having a certain part number. We are 

issuing this AD to prevent elongation of 

the pressure regulator neck, which 

could result in rupture of the oxygen 

cylinder, and in the case of cabin 

depressurization, oxygen not being 

available when required. 

DATES: This AD becomes effective 

March 23, 2012. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of certain publications listed in this AD 

as of March 23, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in person at the 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Operations, M–30, West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe and Mechanical Systems 

Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New York 

Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 

Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, 

New York 11590; telephone (516) 228– 

7318; fax (516) 794–5531. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 to include an AD that would 

apply to the specified products. That 

NPRM was published in the Federal 

Register on October 26, 2011 (76 FR 

66198). The MCAI states: 

During a routine inspection, deformation 

was found at the neck of the pressure 

regulator body on the oxygen Cylinder and 

Regulator Assemblies (CRA). 

An investigation by the vendor, Avox 

Systems Inc., revealed that the deformation 

was attributed to two (2) batches of raw 

material that did not meet the required 

tensile strength. This may cause elongation of 

the pressure regulator neck, which could 

result in rupture of the oxygen cylinder, and 

in the case of cabin depressurization, oxygen 

not being available when required. 

This [Canadian] directive mandates [an 

inspection to determine if a certain oxygen 

CRA is installed and] the replacement of 

oxygen CRAs containing pressure regulators, 

part number (P/N) 806370–06, that do not 

meet the required material properties. 

You may obtain further information 

by examining the MCAI in the AD 

docket. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. We 

received no comments on the NPRM (76 

FR 66198, October 26, 2011), or on the 

determination of the cost to the public. 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the available data and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting the AD 

as proposed except for minor editorial 

changes. We have determined that these 

minor changes: 

• Are consistent with the intent that 

was proposed in the NPRM (76 FR 

66198, October 26, 2011), for correcting 

the unsafe condition; and 

• Do not add any additional burden 

upon the public than was already 

proposed in the NPRM (76 FR 66198, 

October 26, 2011). 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD will affect 

39 products of U.S. registry. We also 

estimate that it will take about 10 workhours per product to comply with the 

basic requirements of this AD. The 

average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. 

Required parts will cost about $0 per 

product. Where the service information 

lists required parts costs that are 

covered under warranty, we have 

assumed that there will be no charge for 

these parts. As we do not control 

warranty coverage for affected parties, 

some parties may incur costs higher 

than estimated here. Based on these 

figures, we estimate the cost of this AD 

to the U.S. operators to be $33,150, or 

$850 per product. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this AD will not 

have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 

3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in 

Alaska; and 

4. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this AD and placed it in the AD docket. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES