alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         Each of the undersigned officers and/or directors of Superconductive
Components, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the "Company"), hereby appoints Daniel
Rooney and Curtis A. Loveland as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact,
or any of them individually with power to act without the other, as his or her
true and lawful attorney-in-fact, in his or her name and on his or her behalf,
and in any and all capacities stated below, to sign and to cause to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any and all amendments
thereto, hereby granting unto said attorneys, and to each of them, full power
and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in
any and all such capacities, every act and thing whatsoever necessary to be done
in and about the premises as fully as each of the undersigned could or might do
in person, hereby granting to each such attorney full power of substitution and
revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such attorney or his substitute
may do by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Power of
Attorney in counterparts if necessary, effective as of March 27, 2003.

    Signature                             Title


/s/ Daniel Rooney             President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
---------------------------   the Board of Directors and Director  (principal
Daniel Rooney                 executive officer)



/s/ Jerry Blaskie             Chief Financial Officer
--------------------------    (principal financial officer and principal
Jerry Blaskie                 officer)
accounting


/s/ Robert J. Baker, Jr.      Director
--------------------------
Robert J. Baker, Jr.


/s/ Edward W. Ungar           Director
--------------------------
Edward W. Ungar
#### Emma L. Hood, Plaintiff, and The People of the State of New York, Appellant, *v.*John A. Whitwell et al., Respondents.

*Hood*v. *Whitwell,*140 App. Div. 882, affirmed.

(Argued December 15, 1910;

decided January 3, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 26, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to restrain the defendants from removing a certain building from plaintiff’s premises, theretofore appropriated for canal purposes, and for damages.

*Edward R. O'Malley, Attorney-General (Andrew E. Tuck*and *Wilber*W. *Chambers*of counsel), for appellant.

*Gerald B. Fluhrer*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
§ 20.400 Penalties. ( a ) Any person who makes an expenditure prohibited herein shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such expenditure.
( b ) Any person who fails to file or amend the disclosure form (see appendix B) to be filed or amended if required herein, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
( c ) A filing or amended filing on or after the date on which an administrative action for the imposition of a civil penalty is commenced does not prevent the imposition of such civil penalty for a failure occurring before that date. An administrative action is commenced with respect to a failure when an investigating official determines in writing to commence an investigation of an allegation of such failure.
( d ) In determining whether to impose a civil penalty, and the amount of any such penalty, by reason of a violation by any person, the agency shall consider the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation, the effect on the ability of such person to continue in business, any prior violations by such person, the degree of culpability of such person, the ability of the person to pay the penalty, and such other matters as may be appropriate.
( e ) First offenders under paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section shall be subject to a civil penalty of $10,000, absent aggravating circumstances. Second and subsequent offenses by persons shall be subject to an appropriate civil penalty between $10,000 and $100,000, as determined by the agency head or his or her designee.
( f ) An imposition of a civil penalty under this section does not prevent the United States from seeking any other remedy that may apply to the same conduct that is the basis for the imposition of such civil penalty.
EXHIBIT 12
----------

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

FOREMOST CORPORATION OF AMERICA AND SUBSIDIARIES
DECEMBER 31, 1995

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


($ in thousands except per share data)
<S>                                                     <C>          <C>
Return on Beginning Shareholders' Equity:
   Net Income ........................................  $ 45,325
   Beginning Shareholder's Equity ....................  $206,626      21.9%

Price Earnings Ratio:
   Price Range Per Share of FCOA Common Stock - Low ..  $  35.25
   Earnings Per Share ................................  $   4.43       8

   Price Range Per Share of FCOA Common Stock - High..  $  52.75
   Earnings Per Share ................................  $   4.43      12

Ratio of Net Written Premiums to Statutory
   Policyholders' Surplus:
      Net Premiums Written ...........................  $419,868
      Statutory Policyholders' Surplus ...............  $200,458       2.1

Ratio of Loss and Loss Expense Reserves to Statutory
   Policyholders' Surplus:
      Loss and Loss Expense Reserves .................  $ 91,333
      Statutory Policyholders' Surplus ...............  $200,458       0.5

Combined Loss and Expense Ratio - GAAP:

   Total Losses and Expenses .........................  $388,071
   Premium Earned ....................................  $426,282      91.1%

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of PHI Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the  period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Henry D. Fahman, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Henry FahmanHenry FahmanActing Chief Financial OfficerMay 23, 2011
*Wednesday, January 20, 1999*

MERIT DOCKET

98-1926.

#### State v. Toda.

Wood App. No. WD-97-111. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that no conflict exists within the meaning of S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(2)(B). This cause is therefore dismissed. See *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 2, 2019

No. 04-18-00817-CV

Joseph A. RAMIREZ and April M. Ramirez,

Appellants

v.

Rosalinda HURON,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CV06197

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

This appeal is DISMISSED. Because appellants are indigent, no costs of this appeal are 

assessed.

It is so ORDERED on January 2, 2019.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of January, 2019.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
-----Original Message----- 

From: ruthmeinking@comcast.net [mailto:ruthmeinking@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:38 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ruth Meinking 

1920 collier 

Colorado Springs, CO 80909
Editorial Note on Part 193
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

§ 193.2719 Training: records. ( a ) Each operator shall maintain a system of records which— ( 1 ) Provide evidence that the training programs required by this subpart have been implemented; and
( 2 ) Provide evidence that personnel have undergone and satisfactorily completed the required training programs.
( b ) Records must be maintained for one year after personnel are no longer assigned duties at the LNG plant.
-----Original Message----- 

From: marilynwaynec@aol.com [mailto:marilynwaynec@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 8:05 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Marilyn Christensen 

6601 Naomi Drive 

Edina, MN 55439
|   | (1)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the four month period ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   | (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                         |

| Dated: July 22, 2011 | By:    | /s/ James Michael Whitfield                                                 |   |
|----------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | James Michael WhitfieldChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |   |
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41228

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDUARDO MARMOLEJO-OCHOA, also known as Ignacio

Medrano-Gutierrez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:05-CR-171-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Eduardo

Marmolejo-Ochoa raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
§ 20.300 Professional and technical services. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 20.100 (a), does not apply in the case of any reasonable payment to a person, other than an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a covered Federal action, if the payment is for professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any bid, proposal, or application for that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or for meeting requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) The reporting requirements in § 20.110 (a) and (b) regarding filing a disclosure form by each person, if required, shall not apply with respect to professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, “professional and technical services” shall be limited to advice and analysis directly applying any professional or technical discipline. For example, drafting or a legal document accompanying a bid or proposal by a lawyer is allowable. Similarly, technical advice provided by an engineer on the performance or operational capability of a piece of equipment rendered directly in the negotiation of a contract is allowable. However, communications with the intent to influence made by a professional (such as a licensed lawyer) or a technical person (such as a licensed accountant) are not allowable under this section unless they provide advice and analysis directly applying their professional or technical expertise and unless the advice or analysis is rendered directly and solely in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action. Thus, for example, communications with the intent to influence made by a lawyer that do not provide legal advice or analysis directly and solely related to the legal aspects of his or her client's proposal, but generally advocate one proposal over another are not allowable under this section because the lawyer is not providing professional legal services. Similarly, communications with the intent to influence made by an engineer providing an engineering analysis prior to the preparation or submission of a bid or proposal are not allowable under this section since the engineer is providing technical services but not directly in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action.
( d ) Requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving a covered Federal award include those required by law or regulation, or reasonably expected to be required by law or regulation, and any other requirements in the actual award documents.
( e ) Persons other than officers or employees of a person requesting or receiving a covered Federal action include consultants and trade associations.
( f ) Only those services expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
Material Safety Data Sheet

Confidential Business Information
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 7, 1995 (111), Para 111.7 Appointment of Conferees--S. 4]
[Page 1310]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.111.7  appointment of conferees--s. 4

  Thereupon, the SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HOBSON, by unanimous consent, 
announced the appointment of Messrs. Clinger, Solomon, Bunning, Dreier, 
Blute, Mrs. Collins of Illinois, Messrs. Sabo, and Beilenson, as 
managers on the part of the House at said conference.
  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate of the foregoing 
appointments.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 21, 1995 (119), Para 119.32 Additional Sponsors]
[Page 1450]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.119.32  additional sponsors

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were added to public bills and 
resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 28: Mr. Hastert.
       H.R. 65: Mr. Tate.
       H.R. 104: Mr. Kim and Mr. Payne of Virginia.
       H.R. 109: Mr. Doolittle.
       H.R. 303: Mr. Tate.
       H.R. 326: Mr. Goss.
       H.R. 436: Mr. Hoekstra.
       H.R. 468: Mr. Gilman.
       H.R. 789: Mr. Ensign.
       H.R. 803: Mr. White.
       H.R. 892: Mr. Lipinski.
       H.R. 941: Mr. Kleczka.
       H.R. 945: Mr. Parker, Mr. Costello, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. 
     Lipinski, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Burton of Indiana, 
     Mr. Hostettler, Mr. Watts of Oklahoma, Mr. Hastert, Mr. 
     Allard, Mr. Chrysler, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Clement, Mr. 
     Gillmor, Mr. Ehrlich, Mr. Kingston, and Mr. Klug.
       H.R. 957: Mr. Coble and Mr. McKeon.
       H.R. 1003: Mr. Hall of Texas and Mr. Minge.
       H.R. 1061: Mr. Holden and Mr. Laughlin.
       H.R. 1078: Ms. Lofgren and Mr. Ackerman.
       H.R. 1161: Mr. Clement and Mr. Souder.
       H.R. 1595: Mr. Longley, Mr. Camp, Mr. Martini, Mr. Durbin, 
     Mrs. Meyers of Kansas, Mr. Schiff, and Mr. Kennedy of Rhode 
     Island.
       H.R. 1619: Mr. Fawell.
       H.R. 1711: Mr. Baker of Louisiana.
       H.R. 1713: Mr. Smith of Texas.
       H.R. 1747: Mr. Greenwood and Ms. Pelosi.
       H.R. 1776: Mr. Sabo, Mr. Dingell, and Mr. Quinn.
       H.R. 1920: Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania and Mr. Holden.
       H.R. 2146: Mr. Coyne, Mr. Camp, and Mr. Klug.
       H.R. 2195: Mrs. Seastrand.
       H.R. 2244: Mr. Weller.
       H.R. 2265: Mr. Zeliff, Mr. Hefner, Mr. Scarborough, and Mr. 
     Ward.
       H.R. 2271: Ms. Lofgren.
       H.R. 2326: Mr. Bereuter, Mr. Frost, Mr. Gejdenson, Mr. 
     English of Pennsylvania, Ms. Molinari, Mr. Barrett of 
     Wisconsin, and Mr. Ackerman.
       H.R. 2338: Mr. Ackerman.
       H.R. 2353: Mr. Flanagan, Mr. Bishop, Mr. Smith of New 
     Jersey, Mr. Bilirakis, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. Weller, Mr. 
     Clement, and Mr. Barr.
       H.R. 2363: Mr. Hoekstra.
       H. Res. 30: Mr. Franks of New Jersey and Mr. Fields of 
     Louisiana.
       H. Res. 134: Mr. Forbes, Mr. English of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
     Beilenson, Mr. ensign, Mr. Ganske, Mr. Graham, Mr. Luther, 
     Mr. Fox, Mr. Hayworth, Mr. Foley, and Mr. Chrysler.
       H. Res. 214: Mr. Inglis of South Carolina, Mr. Forbes, Mr. 
     Leach, and Mr. LoBiondo.
```
#### § 200.1 General.

This part prescribes procedures under which applications will be received and heard and by which rules and orders will be issued under subsection 402(e) and section 406 of the Rail Passenger Service Act (45 U.S.C. 562(e) and 566).
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2322

To designate the Walla Walla Veterans Medical Center located at 77 Wainwright Drive, Walla Walla, Washington, as the ‘‘Jonathan M. Wainwright

Memorial VA Medical Center’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 13, 1995

Mr. NETHERCUTT (for himself, Ms. DUNN of Washington, Mr. HASTINGS of

Washington, Mr. METCALF, Mrs. SMITH of Washington, Mr. TATE, Mr.

WHITE, Mr. DICKS, and Mr. MCDERMOTT) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To designate the Walla Walla Veterans Medical Center located at 77 Wainwright Drive, Walla Walla, Washington,

as the ‘‘Jonathan M. Wainwright Memorial VA Medical

Center’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Walla Walla Veterans Medical Center located at

5 77 Wainwright Drive, Walla Walla, Washington, shall be

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Jonathan M. Wainwright

7 Memorial VA Medical Center’’.
2

•HR 2322 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Walla

4 Walla Veterans Medical Center referred to in section 1

5 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jonathan M.

6 Wainwright Memorial VA Medical Center’’.

Æ
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Changing the beat: a study ofthe worklife of jazz musicians**
 
SuDoc Number:NF 2.21:43/V.1-3

Item Number:Link0831-B-35 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000891480
 
VolumeI: Executive Summary
Volume II:American Federation of Musicians Survey Results
Volume III:Respondent-Driven Sampling
 
March 3, 2020
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                      CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Contour Medical, Inc.
St. Petersburg, Florida

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement of Contour Medical, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Number 33-92110) of our
report dated August 18, 1995, except for the stock split discussed in Note 9
which is as of March 15, 1996, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of Contour Medical, Inc. and subsidiaries appearing in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1996.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

Orlando, Florida
October 14, 1997
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 07-57]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

      ( print page 48991)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 07-57 with attached transmittal, and policy justification.

Dated: August 20, 2007.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 48992)          ( print page 48993)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 07-4188 Filed 8-24-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C