alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
, .. , :--,..,.! • r: • ,-r c ,... :-' ::, ,.; I :ij,-J·I ),.. .. r \. '· . v ... _ '! J 

·· ;j-"'r•'1f'·T'T!Q1U BEFORE THE · \ ::.,((y\ II\ T•l · ... · ,,... t'' r)'-'lj '"1('' •n DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION·.··• t: '.): t:-1. \i !,)()::) 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

7'11? . \1 I l : ... ' '· , I ; .:.! 

Motion of 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. DOT-OST-1996-1203 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41, Schedule B-7) 

MOTION OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. FOR 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: 

VIRASB VAHIDI 

Senior Vice President -

Marketing and Planning 

and Chief Commercial Officer 

American Airlines, Inc. 

P.O. Box 619616, MD 5628 

DFW Airport, Texas 75261 

May 10, 2012 

WILLIAM K. RIS, JR. 

Senior Vice President -

Government Affairs 

American Airlines, Inc. 

1101 17th Street, N.W. 

Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

CARL B. NELSON 

Associate General Counsel 

American Airlines, Inc. 

1101 17th Street, N.W. 

Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

(202) 496-5647 

carl.nelson@aa.com 
Motion of 

BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41, Schedule B-7) 

DOT-OST-1996-1203 

MOTION OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. FOR 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 

American Airlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.12, hereby 

moves that its Form 41, Schedule B-7 for 1Q2012 be accorded 

confidential treatment and withheld from public disclosure. 

The information for which confidential treatment is requested 

pertains to American's airframe and aircraft engine acquisitions and retirements. 

In accordance with the Department's Final Rule on Submitting Airline Data via the Internet, 75 Fed. Reg. 41580, 

41582, July 16, 2010, we are uploading our confidential report 

On June 5, 1995, by letter of James W. Mitchell, Director, Office of Airline Statistics, the Department granted 

confidential treatment for a lO~year period to similar data 

filed by American. For the reasons stated in that letter, the 

current submission should also receive confidential treatment 

for 10 years. 
2 -

WHEREFORE, American moves that the schedule being 

submitted electronically to the above-referenced website be 

withheld from public disclosure under Rule 12 for a period of 

10 years. 

May 10, 2012 

Respectfully submitted, 

CARL B. NELSON 

Associate General Counsel 

American Airlines, Inc.
#### § 23.71 Does a recipient have to change existing concession agreements?

When an extension or option to renew such an agreement is exercised, or when a material amendment is made, you must assess potential for ACDBE participation and may, if permitted by the agreement, use any means authorized by this part to obtain a modified amount of ACDBE participation in the renewed or amended agreement.

[70 FR 14508, Mar. 22, 2005, as amended at 89 FR 24962, Apr. 9, 2024]
§ 222.42 How does this rule affect Intermediate Quiet Zones and Intermediate Partial Quiet Zones? ( a ) ( 1 ) Existing restrictions may, at the public authority's discretion, remain in place within the Intermediate Quiet Zone or Intermediate Partial Quiet Zone until June 24, 2006, if the public authority provides Notice of Quiet Zone Continuation, in accordance with § 222.43 of this part.
( 2 ) A public authority may continue locomotive horn sounding restrictions beyond June 24, 2006 by establishing a New Quiet Zone or New Partial Quiet Zone. A public authority may establish a New Quiet Zone or New Partial Quiet Zone if: ( i ) Notice of Intent is mailed, in accordance with § 222.43 of this part;
( ii ) The quiet zone complies with the standards set forth in § 222.39 of this part;
( iii ) The quiet zone complies with the New Quiet Zone standards set forth in §§ 222.25, 222.27, and 222.35 of this part;
( iv ) Notice of Quiet Zone Establishment is mailed, in accordance with § 222.43 of this part, by June 3, 2006.
( b ) *Conversion of Intermediate Partial Quiet Zones into 24-hour New Quiet Zones.* An Intermediate Partial Quiet Zone may be converted into a 24-hour New Quiet Zone if: ( 1 ) Notice of Intent is mailed, in accordance with § 222.43 of this part;
( 2 ) The quiet zone complies with the standards set forth in § 222.39 of this part;
( 3 ) The quiet zone is brought into compliance with the New Quiet Zone requirements set forth in §§ 222.25, 222.27, and 222.35 of this part; and
( 4 ) Notice of Quiet Zone Establishment is mailed, in accordance with § 222.43 of this part, by June 3, 2006.
#### § 196.201 What is the purpose and scope of this subpart?

This subpart describes the enforcement authority and sanctions exercised by the Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety for achieving and maintaining pipeline safety under this part. It also prescribes the procedures governing the exercise of that authority and the imposition of those sanctions.
-----Original Message----- 

From: bpkmail@aol.com [mailto:bpkmail@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:54 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Beth Kraft 

4722 Noeline Ave 

Encino, CA 91436
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 13, 1995 (114), Para 114.22 Providing for a Closed Conference--H.R. 2126]
[Page 1340]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.114.22  providing for a closed conference--h.r. 2126

  Mr. YOUNG of Florida moved, pursuant to clause 6(a) of rule XXVIII, 
that the conference committee meetings between the House and the Senate 
on the bill (H.R. 2126) making appropriations for the Department of 
Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other 
purposes; be closed to the public at such times as classified national 
security information is under consideration; Provided, however, that any 
sitting Member of Congress shall have a right to attend any closed or 
open meeting.
  The question being put,
  Will the House agree to said motion?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaHOOD, announced that a roll call was 
required under clause 6, rule XXVIII, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

414

affirmative

Nays

0
```
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Fitzpatrick, Overton and Senior Judge Hodges 

Argued at Salem, Virginia 

CITY OF ROANOKE 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

v. Record No. 2643-95-3 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON 

 JULY 2, 1996 

RONALD F. RENICK 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 Steven J. Talevi, Assistant City Attorney 

(Wilburn C. Dibling, Jr., City Attorney, on 

briefs), for appellant. 

 Mary L. Poletti (Brumberg, Mackey & Wall, 

P.L.C., on brief), for appellee. 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 

 The Workers' Compensation Commission awarded benefits to the 

claimant, Ronald F. Renick, for his condition of esophageal 

motility disorder resulting from extreme stress in his 

employment. Renick's employer appeals, challenging both the 

classification of his condition as an occupational disease and 

the causal link to his employment. 

 The parties are fully conversant with the record to this 

case, and a recitation of the facts is unnecessary to this 

memorandum opinion. 

 Renick's condition was established as a disease. All 

medical records as well as the medical literature demonstrate 

that the treating doctors as well as the medical community 

believe this to be a disease. This classification is a medical 
- 2 - 

issue to be decided by the trier of fact based on evidence at the 

hearing. Knott v. Blue Bell, Inc., 7 Va. App. 335, 338, 373 

S.E.2d 481, 483 (1988). 

 Renick's employment caused the stress that triggered his 

condition. No other source of stress was noted or argued by 

either doctors or counsel. The treating specialists ruled out 

other causes and came to the conclusion that stress caused his 

condition. "[A] determination of causation is a factual 

finding." Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Musick, 7 Va. App. 684, 688, 376 

S.E.2d 814, 817 (1989). 

 We find that credible evidence supports the commission's 

findings, and we will not disturb them on appeal. The decision 

of the commission is affirmed. 

 Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23

           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS



As independent petroleum engineers, we herby consent to (i)
the reference in this Form 10-K of Central Natural Resources
Inc. ( the "Company"), as well as in the Notes to the
Consolidated a financial Statements included in such Form 10-
K, to the report prepared by T. J. Smith & Company, Inc.
entitled "Central Natural Resources, Inc., Reserves and
Future Net Revenues for Interest Owned as of December 31,
2003 Using SEC Parameters", dated February 25, 2004,
relating to the estimated quantities of future proved
reserves and income attributable to the interests of the
Company.

T.J. Smith & Company, Inc.

By:   /s/  K. H. Dwight
__________________
K.H. Dwight , P.E.


Houston, Texas
March 16, 2004
Carbon Pollution Standards for the Power Sector

1. New power plants

• Proposed January 8, 2014

• Final Summer 2015

2. Modified and reconstructed

power plants

• Proposed June 2014

• Final Summer 2015

3. Existing power plants

• Proposed Guidelines June 2014

• Final Guidelines Summer 2015

• State Plans due Summer 2016

• Proposed Federal Plan summer 

2015 (final ready summer 2016)

New Source Performance Standards

http://www.epa.gov/cleanpowerplan

15
President Obama’s Proposed FY 2016 Budget

The President’s FY16 budget prioritizes climate action by providing funding to 

support efforts to address climate change

• $25 million in grants to help states develop their Clean Power Plan strategies

• Clean Power State Incentive Fund Proposal of $4 billion investment fund for 

states choosing to go beyond minimum requirements in the Clean Power Plan

• The Fund will enable states that accelerate their reductions from the power sector to 

receive resources for their heightened efforts

• States could use funds for a range of 

activities that advance or complement 

the Clean Power Plan

2

http://www2.epa.gov/planandbudget/fy2016
#### James C. Cornell, *Plaintiff, v.*Mary P. Cornell, *Defendant.*

Motion for new trial denied, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Dykman, J., not sitting.
§ 207.3 Designation and commissioning. ( a ) A railroad may designate employees to be commissioned by a state authority as railroad police officers to serve in the states in which the railroad owns property.
( b ) Except as provided by § 207.6, the designated railroad police officer shall be commissioned by the railroad police officer's state of legal residence or the railroad police officer's state of primary employment.
[59 FR 6587, Feb. 11, 1994, as amended at 81 FR 88132, Dec. 7, 2016]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT STEARNS,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

v.

LYNN GUYER,

Respondent

- Appellee. No. 19

- 35472

D.C. No.

9:18

- cv

- 00169

- DLC

- JCL

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 4, 2020 * *

Portland, Oregon

Before: BERZON and COLLINS, Circuit Judges, and CHOE

- GROVES, ** * Judge.

The Eighth Amen dment proportionality claim raised by Stearns’ petition is

barred by the rule against second or successive habeas petitions codified at 28

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Jennifer Choe

- Groves, Judge for the United States

Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

JUN 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

U.S.C. § 2244 (b). Stearns cannot make a showing that he is entitled to relief from

that rule under any of the criteri a set forth under section 2244(b)(2). Specifically,

Stearns’ Eighth Amendment claim does not rely on a new rule of constitutional law

made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, and the

factual predicate for the claim was known to Stearns at the time he filed his initial

petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)(A), (B). Accordingly, construing Stearns’

appeal as a request for authorization to file a second or successive petition, see id.

§ 2244(b)(3)(A), we deny the request.

Moreover , section 2244 (b) notwithstanding, Stearns’ E ighth A mendment

proportionality claim is procedurally barred because it was not presented to the

Montana state courts

. See Zichko v. Idaho , 247 F.3d 1015, 1021

– 22 (9th Cir. 2001)

(citing O’Sullivan v. Boerckel

, 526 U.S. 838, 848 (1999))

. His claim is also

untimely under AEDPA’s one

- year statute of limitations. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) (1)

.

Stearns’ appeal is therefore denied and the order dismissing his petition

affirmed.

AFFIRMED

.
-----Original Message----- 

From: mf328@earthlink.net [mailto:mf328@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 8:52 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

martha fox 

2915 w. Lunt 

chicago, IL 60645
#### § 199.215 Alcohol concentration.

Each operator shall prohibit a covered employee from reporting for duty or remaining on duty requiring the performance of covered functions while having an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater. No operator having actual knowledge that a covered employee has an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater shall permit the employee to perform or continue to perform covered functions.
-----Original Message----- 

From: newdefiner@aol.com [mailto:newdefiner@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:46 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Nancy Dickson 

PO Box 280 

Garrett Park, MD 20896
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MOHAMMED ABDUL RAHMAN KHAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 332 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
**Exhibit 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, W. Douglas Parker, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of America West Airlines, Inc. (the “Company”) and Derek J. Kerr, the Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:
1.  The Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June30, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Periodic Report”),fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and 2.  The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 26th day of April 2005.    /s/ W. Douglas Parker  W. Douglas Parker Chief Executive Officer    /s/ Derek J. Kerr  Derek J. Kerr Chief Financial Officer
57
-----Original Message----- 

From: marpr592@aol.com [mailto:marpr592@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 2:08 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 03, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

MARIA PEREZ 

734 E IMPERIAL HWY 

LOS ANGELES, CA 90059
§ 219.405 Documentation requirements. ( a ) Each railroad must maintain written documentation that specifically describes the basis for each reasonable cause test it performs under Federal authority. This documentation must be completed promptly by the responsible railroad supervisor; although it does not need to be completed before the reasonable cause testing is conducted.
( b ) For a rule violation, the documentation must include the type of rule violation and the involvement of each tested regulated employee. For a train accident or train incident reportable under part 225 of this chapter, a railroad must describe either the amount of railroad property damage or the reportable casualty and the basis for the supervisor's belief that the employee's acts or omissions contributed to the occurrence or severity of the train accident or train incident.
Notification of diseases that may be confused with vesicular diseases. Years 2008 to 2012.

Month PROVINCE Origin of denouncement Affected Specie Diagnosis

March SANTA FE Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Footrot

April SANTA FE Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD)

April SANTA FE Denouncement by Government officers Bovine Traumatic injury

April ENTRE RIOS Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Traumatic injury

May CORRIENTES Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Eucalyptus Disease (intoxication by Ramaria flavo-brunnescens 

fungus)

May BUENOS AIRES Third party dennouncement Equine Vesicular Stomatitis was discarded

June SANTA FE Third party dennouncement Bovine Footrot

August ENTRE RIOS Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Actinomicosis

September SANTA FE Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Footrot

December JUJUY Spontaneous denouncement Porcine Hidden foot and hoof infection

January SALTA Spontaneous denouncement Ovine Intoxication

March MISIONES Third party dennouncement Bovine Infectious Bovine Rinotracheitis (IBR)

September JUJUY Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Footrot

October JUJUY Spontaneous denouncement Porcine Hidden foot and hoof infection

October BUENOS AIRES Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Photosensitization 

November SALTA Spontaneous denouncement Ovine Contagious ecthyma

November BUENOS AIRES Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Photosensitization 

January BUENOS AIRES Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Footrot

March SALTA Denouncement by Government officers Bovine Footrot

April SALTA Spontaneous denouncement Ovine Contagious ecthyma

June JUJUY Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Babesiosis

November SALTA Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Intoxication

November SALTA Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Intoxication

December JUJUY Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Inanition. 

December SGO DEL ESTERO Third party dennouncement Caprine Footrot

March RIO NEGRO Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD)

March CORRIENTES Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Footrot

June JUJUY Spontaneous denouncement Caprine Contagious ecthyma

August CHACO Spontaneous denouncement Caprine Contagious ecthyma

September ENTRE RIOS Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Infectious Bovine Rinotracheitis (IBR)

September ENTRE RIOS Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Infectious Bovine Rinotracheitis (IBR)

October CORRIENTES Denouncement by Government officers Bovine Parasitosis

October CORRIENTES Denouncement by Government officers Bovine Parasitosis

November CHACO Spontaneous denouncement Caprine Contagious ecthyma

March RIO NEGRO Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Photsensitization by unidentified toxic plant ingestion 

May CORRIENTES Spontaneous denouncement Bovine Eucalyptus Disease (intoxication by Ramaria flavo-brunnescens 

fungus)

September RIO NEGRO Third party dennouncement Bovine IBR/DVB.

October ENTRE RIOS Spontaneous denouncement Bovine IBR/DVB.

December BUENOS AIRES Third party dennouncement Ovine Contagious Ecthyma 

2012

2008

2011

2009

2010
SUMMARY
      OF COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS





Compensation
      for independent members of the Board of Directors of Pressure BioSciences,
      Inc.
      (the "Company") consists of a quarterly stipend of $8,000, of which $4,000
      is
      compensation for attending full Board meetings (whether telephonic or in-person)
      and $4,000 is compensation for attending committee meetings. There is no limit
      to the number of full Board or committee meetings called. Cash
      compensation is paid on or immediately prior to the last day of each fiscal
      quarter. In
      addition to cash compensation, each independent member of the Board of Directors
      also receives a one-time grant of 10,000 fully vested, non-qualified stock
      options as soon as feasible after joining the Board of Directors, as well as
      an
      annual grant of 30,000 fully vested, non-qualified stock options. To be granted
      on April 15 th ,
      or the
      first business day after April 15 th in the
      case that this day falls on a weekend. In
      2007,
      the non-employee directors elected to waive their right to receive their annual
      grant of stock options.
§ 179.103-4 Safety relief devices and pressure regulators. ( a ) Safety relief devices and pressure regulators must be located on top of the tank near the center of the car on a nozzle, mounting plate or recess in the shell. Through or stud bolts, if used, must not enter the tank.
( b ) Metal guard of approved design must be provided to protect safety relief devices and pressure regulators from damage.
[Amdt. 179-10, 36 FR 21348, Nov. 6, 1971]
#### Henry Seibert and Charles Seibert, Respondents, *v.*Eleonora Mayer and others, *Appellants*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in each Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (file numbers 33-5456, 33-38590, 33-39374, 33-53763 and
33-53899) of CLARCOR Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated January 7, 2000
relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in the Annual
Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form
10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
January 7, 2000 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in
this Form 10-K.

                                         /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 23, 2000