alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1106.4 The Safety Integration Plan process. ( a ) Each applicant in a transaction subject to this part shall file a proposed SIP in accordance with the informational requirements prescribed at 49 CFR part 244, or other FRA guidelines or requirements regarding the contents of a SIP, with OEA and FRA no later than 60 days from the date the application is filed with the Board.
( b ) The proposed SIP shall be made part of the environmental record in the Board proceeding and dealt with in the ongoing environmental review process under 49 CFR part 1105. The procedures governing the process shall be as follows: ( 1 ) In accordance with 49 CFR 244.17, FRA will provide its findings and conclusions on the adequacy of the proposed SIP (*i.e.,* assess whether the proposed SIP establishes a process that provides a reasonable assurance of safety in executing the proposed transaction) to OEA at a date sufficiently in advance of the Board's issuance of its draft environmental documentation in the case to permit incorporation in the draft environmental document.
( 2 ) The draft environmental documentation shall incorporate the proposed SIP, any revisions or modifications to it based on further consultations with FRA, and FRA's written comments regarding the SIP. The public may review and comment on the draft environmental documentation within the time limits prescribed by OEA.
( 3 ) OEA will independently review each proposed SIP. In its final environmental documentation, OEA will address written comments on the proposed SIP received during the time established for submitting comments on the draft environmental documentation. The Board then will consider the full environmental record, including the information concerning the SIP, in arriving at its decision in the case.
( 4 ) If the Board approves the transaction and adopts the SIP, it will require compliance with the SIP as a condition to its approval. Each applicant involved in the transaction then shall coordinate with FRA in implementing the approved SIP, including any amendments thereto. FRA has provided in its rules at 49 CFR 244.17(g) for submitting information to the Board during implementation of an approved transaction that will assist the Board in exercising its continuing jurisdiction over the transaction. FRA also has agreed to advise the Board when, in its view, the integration of the applicants' operations has been safely completed.
( c ) If a SIP is required in transactions that would not be subject to environmental review under the Board's environmental rules at 49 CFR part 1105, the Board will develop appropriate case-specific SIP procedures based on the facts and circumstances presented.
[67 FR 11607, Mar. 15, 2002, as amended at 83 FR 15078, Apr. 9, 2018]
Opinion issued September 1 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 16
- 00384
- CV

——————————— RICHARD A. HAASE AND AUDREY LOIS HAASE , Appella nts V. COUNTRYWIDE HOMES LO ANS, INC, BANK OF AM ERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA , N.A., MORG AN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I, INC., CER TIFICATE HOLDERS FOR MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I, INC T RUST 2006
- HE6, MORTGAGE PASS T HROUGH

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006
- HE6 , Appell e e s
On Appeal from the 400th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 07
- CV
- 161177

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants, Richard A. Haase and Audrey Lois Haase, filed a notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and state they are appealing from the2

Southern District of Texas. The Fort Bend District Clerk assigned the appeal to this Court. On May 17, 2016, Ana Alas, a Deputy District Clerk in the Fort Bend District Clerk’s Office, filed an affidavit stating that she inadvertently assigned this appeal to the First Court of Appeals. An a ttachment to this affidavit reflects the action filed by the Haases in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. On June 15, 2016, this Court issued a notice to appellants, advising them that we would dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless they filed a response on or before June 27, 2016 establishing that this Court had jurisdiction. No response was received. Accordingly , we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction

.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Higley and Huddle.
-----Original Message----- 

From: pearl@spacestar.net [mailto:pearl@spacestar.net] 

Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 4:54 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 30, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lynne Gray 

w.9116 501st.. ave. 

ellsworth, WI 54011
271 P.2d 1022

#### FREEMAN v. SUNSHINE MINING CO.

No. 8069.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

June 15, 1954.

Rossi & Fanning, Wallace, for appellant.

H. J. Hull & Sons, Wallace, for respondent.

KEETON, Justice.

Claimant, on August 2, 1947, filed with the Industrial Accident Board, a claim for compensation because of an alleged oc*293cupational disease disability, and in his application for hearing filed June 10, 1948, claimed that he was totally and permanently disabled for work because of silicosis. The matter was set for hearing for June 30, 1948. Respondent denied liability and a voluntary settlement approved by the Board was made with claimant on the 30th day of June, 1948, and the proceedings dismissed. Thereafter on May 8, 1953, petition was filed by claimant’s counsel to cancel the order of dismissal and for further hearing.

Among other defenses respondent pleaded that the claim was barred by the provisions of Secs. 72-607, 72-1228 and 72-1230, I.C. On September 1, 1953, the Board, by written final order made of record, ruled: “Recovery under claimant’s present petition is barred by Sections 72-607 and 72-1230 I.C.”, and denied relief and dismissed the proceedings. Thereafter, on October 2, 1953, from this order, claimant filed a notice of appeal with the Clerk of the Supreme Court and the Secretary of the Industrial Accident Board.

When the case was called for argument respondent challenged the jurisdiction of this Court to hear the matter and moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that this Court had no jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not filed within thirty days after the final order of the Board appealed from.

Sec. 72-609, I.C. reads in part as follows:

> “Within thirty days after a final order or an award of the industrial accident board has been made and filed, any party affected thereby may appeal to the Supreme Court of the state to review the lawfulness of the final order or award. Such appeal shall be taken by filing in the Supreme Court a notice of appeal and serving a copy of the same on the secretary of the board and a copy upon the adverse party or his attorney. Such notice shall be filed and served within thirty days after such final order or award has been made and filed * *

It therefore appears that failure to file the notice of appeal with the Clerk of the Supreme Court and a copy with the Secretary of the Board, within the time prescribed by the above statute, deprives this Court of jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Adams v. McPherson, 3 Idaho 718, 34 P. 1095; Moe v. Harger, 10 Idaho 194, 77 P. 645; Glenn v. Aultman & Taylor Machinery Co., 30 Idaho 719, 167 P. 1163; Mills v. Board of County Commissioners, 35 Idaho 47, 204 P. 876; Estate of Dunn, 45 Idaho 23, 260 P. 432.

The requirements of the statute relative to perfecting an appeal are mandatory and jurisdictional, and failure to comply gives this Court no jurisdiction. Brebner v. Western Pine Mfg. Co., 53 Idaho 314, 23 P.2d 723.

The appeal is dismissed.

PORTER, C. J., and GIVENS, TAYLOR and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
-----Original Message----- 

From: crockerbuckle@mindspring.com 

[mailto:crockerbuckle@mindspring.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:47 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

nancy arbuckle 

524 Nimitz Ave. 

redwood City, CA 94061
-----Original Message----- 

From: dweitzer@comcast.net [mailto:dweitzer@comcast.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 5:48 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

david weitzer 

16283 sw scholls ferry 

beaverton, OR 97007
#### § 222.31 [Reserved]
-----Original Message----- 

From: DragosaniW@aol.com [mailto:DragosaniW@aol.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 10:31 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Rebecca Urban 

2805 Sheraton St. 

Silver Spring, MD 20906
Office of Transportation and Air Quality

EPA-420-B-12-022d

November 2012

EMTS System Changes

The following EMTS system changes are planned for upcoming releases of the EMTS.

Version 2.2 – Scheduled for release on December 15, 2012

• Effective December 15, 2012, a new QA check will be enabled in EMTS 2.2 so that each submission shall 

use a single RIN year across its transactions. 

For example, a submission comprised of two transactions: one Buy transaction and one Sell transaction

for the purchase and sale of 2012 RINs respectively. This submission will pass the new QA check. 

However, if the same submission includes a buy of 2012 RINs and a sale of 2011 RINs, then the 

submission will fail the new QA check. In this last example, two submissions will be required in order for 

these transactions to be submitted to EMTS, one submission for the buy of the 2012 RINs and one 

submission for the sale of the 2011 RINs.

For submissions that include Generate transactions, the year in the Production Date field is derived as 

being the RIN Year. This means that you cannot generate 2013 RINs (e.g., Production Date = 1/5/2013)

and sell 2012 RINs in the same submission.

NOTE: This QA check applies to XML submissions AND the EMTS web application. The EMTS web 

application will be modified to utilize this QA check through changes to the user interface. 

Questions?

Please send all questions to support@epamts-support.com.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet as of March 31, 1997, Statement of Operations for 3 months ended March 31,
1997, Statement of Cash Flows for 3 months ended March 31, 1997 and Notes to
Unaudited Interim Financial Statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,029
<SECURITIES>                                    11,498
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,119
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (179)
<INVENTORY>                                        274
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,787
<PP&E>                                          17,764
<DEPRECIATION>                                (13,542)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,002
<BONDS>                                          4,023
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,717
<SALES>                                            307
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,529
<CGS>                                              252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,121
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (641)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (641)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     191
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (450)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7479

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

TREMAYNE K. GRAHAM, a/k/a Kiki, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (6:03-cr-01092-HMH-10; 6:09-cv-70072-HMH) 

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009 

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Tremayne K. Graham, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra 

Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Tremayne K. Graham seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude Graham has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate 

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
-----Original Message----- 

From: unionunderground@comcast.net 

[mailto:unionunderground@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:51 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lisa Wilson 

6496 Glen Ct SE 

Lacey, WA 98503
-----Original Message----- 

From: lencarbone@yahoo.com [mailto:lencarbone@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:22 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Leonard Carbone 

2809 Wadsworth Rd. 

Noton, OH 44203
Exhibit 32.2




                  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of The
American Education Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended
September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Neil R. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
  material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of
  the Company.



By:  /s/ Neil R. Johnson
     -------------------
     Neil R. Johnson
     Chief Financial Officer

     July 27, 2006
-----Original Message----- 

From: lindamaki@comcast.net [mailto:lindamaki@comcast.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 2:19 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Linda Maki 

1185 Altschul Ave 

Menlo Park, CA 94025
-----Original Message----- 

From: sam527@hotmail.com [mailto:sam527@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:19 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

sam oberlander 

4425 chimney 

srasota, FL 34235
EXHIBIT 31.1 

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Beverly A. Cummings, Chief Financial Officer of PrimeEnergy Management Corporation, the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, certify that:

- I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sterling Gas Drilling Fund 1982
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

August 12, 2003  
/s/ Beverly A. Cummings   
-------------------------------------
  
Beverly A Cummings   
Chief Financial Officer   
PrimeEnergy Management Corporation   
Managing General Partner