alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
23.1



















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (File Nos. 33-56473, 33-56487, 333-14189, 333-30763, 333-50627, 333-130603
and 333-145388) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-111452) of Chesapeake Corporation of
our report dated March 6, 2008 relating to the financial statements and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 10-K.








/s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS
LLP


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS
LLP


Richmond,
Virginia


March 6,
2008
-----Original Message----- 

From: mc5393@aol.com [mailto:mc5393@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:43 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Margaret Cantu 

28603 Adler Drive 

Warren, MI 48088
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2204 Engrossed in House (EH)]

    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2204

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend and reauthorize the Defense Production Act of 1950, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defense Production Act Amendments of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS.

    Section 717(a) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 
App. 2166(a)) is amended in the first sentence by striking ``Title I 
(except section 104), title III, and title VII (except sections 708, 
714, 719, and 721) of this Act, and all authority conferred thereunder 
shall terminate at the close of September 30, 1995'' and inserting 
``Title I (except section 104), title III, and title VII (except 
sections 708 and 721), and all authority conferred thereunder, shall 
terminate at the close of September 30, 1998''.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZING APPROPRIATIONS FOR TITLE III PROJECTS.

    Section 711 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. App. 
2161) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``(a) Authorization.--'' 
        and all that follows through ``subsection (c),,'' and inserting 
        ``(a) Authorization.--Except as provided in subsection (b),''; 
        and
            (2) by striking subsections (b), (c), and (d) and inserting 
        after subsection (a) the following new subsection:
    ``(b) Title III Authorization.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated for each of the fiscal years 1996, 1997, and 1998, such 
sums as may be necessary to carry out title III.''.

SEC. 4. REPORTS TO THE CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--The President shall prepare and transmit to the 
Committee on Banking and Financial Services of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 
Affairs of the Senate an interim report and a final report on proposed 
legislative modernization of the authorities contained in the Defense 
Production Act of 1950.
    (b) Timing.--The President shall so transmit--
            (1) the interim report required by subsection (a), not 
        later than January 31, 1997; and
            (2) the final report required by subsection (a), not later 
        than September 30, 1997.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2204

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To extend and reauthorize the Defense Production Act of 1950, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SOUTHSIDE
BANCSHARES CORP.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH DOCUMENT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          16,431
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,868
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                13,425
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     97,741
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          97,289
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            99,228
<LOANS>                                        364,127
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 615,721
<DEPOSITS>                                     529,004
<SHORT-TERM>                                    17,598
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,591
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,995
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,533
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 615,721
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 22,347
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,016
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,001
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                31,364
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,796
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           16,568
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       47
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,907
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,061
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,061
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,124
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.81
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.25
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,726
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,404
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,120
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      435
<RECOVERIES>                                       233
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,222
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             6,222
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 173

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

#### § 173.141 Class 9—Assignment of packing group.

The packing group of a Class 9 material is as indicated in column 5 of the § 172.101 table.
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.55 Reporting safety-related conditions. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each operator shall report in accordance with § 195.56 the existence of any of the following safety-related conditions involving pipelines in service: ( 1 ) General corrosion that has reduced the wall thickness to less than that required for the maximum operating pressure, and localized corrosion pitting to a degree where leakage might result.
( 2 ) Unintended movement or abnormal loading of a pipeline by environmental causes, such as an earthquake, landslide, or flood, that impairs its serviceability.
( 3 ) Any material defect or physical damage that impairs the serviceability of a pipeline.
( 4 ) Any malfunction or operating error that causes the pressure of a pipeline to rise above 110 percent of its maximum operating pressure.
( 5 ) A leak in a pipeline that constitutes an emergency.
( 6 ) Any safety-related condition that could lead to an imminent hazard and causes (either directly or indirectly by remedial action of the operator), for purposes other than abandonment, a 20 percent or more reduction in operating pressure or shutdown of operation of a pipeline.
( b ) A report is not required for any safety-related condition that— ( 1 ) Exists on a pipeline that is more than 220 yards (200 meters) from any building intended for human occupancy or outdoor place of assembly, except that reports are required for conditions within the right-of-way of an active railroad, paved road, street, or highway, or that occur offshore or at onshore locations where a loss of hazardous liquid could reasonably be expected to pollute any stream, river, lake, reservoir, or other body of water;
( 2 ) Is an accident that is required to be reported under § 195.50 or results in such an accident before the deadline for filing the safety-related condition report; or
( 3 ) Is corrected by repair or replacement in accordance with applicable safety standards before the deadline for filing the safety-related condition report, except that reports are required for all conditions under paragraph (a)(1) of this section other than localized corrosion pitting on an effectively coated and cathodically protected pipeline.
[Amdt. 195-39, 53 FR 24950, July 1, 1988; 53 FR 29800, Aug. 8, 1988, as amended by Amdt. 195-63, 63 FR 37506, July 13, 1998]
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**SARBANES-OXLEY 302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Timothy L. Russell, Chief Executive Officer of Datakey, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Datakey, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the small business issuer and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the smallbusiness issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during thesmall business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small businessissuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: August 9, 2004      Signature:/s/ Timothy L. Russell       Timothy L. Russell   Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1778 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1778

To prohibit the Department of the Interior from expending any funds for 
         a mid-Atlantic coast offshore oil and gas lease sale.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 1995

Mr. Pallone (for himself, Mr. Jones, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Rose, 
   Mr. Gejdenson, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Torricelli, Ms. DeLauro, and Mr. 
   Nadler) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Department of the Interior from expending any funds for 
         a mid-Atlantic coast offshore oil and gas lease sale.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR MID-ATLANTIC OIL AND 
              GAS LEASE SALE.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall not expend any funds for the 
preparation of, or conduct of, preleasing and leasing activities 
(including calls for information, tract selection, notices of sale, 
receipt of bids, and award of leases) with respect to an oil and gas 
lease sale on any lands of the outer Continental Shelf between the 
seaward boundary between the States of Connecticut and Rhode Island and 
the seaward boundary between the States of North Carolina and South 
Carolina.
                                 <all>
```
§ 178.1055 Stacking test. ( a ) *General.* The stacking test must be conducted for the qualification of all Flexible Bulk Containers design types.
( b ) *Special preparation for the stacking test.* All Flexible Bulk Containers design types must be loaded to their maximum permissible gross mass.
( c ) *Test method.* ( 1 ) All Flexible Bulk Containers must be placed on their base on level, hard ground and subjected to a uniformly distributed superimposed test load that is four times the design type maximum gross weight for a period of at least twenty-four hours.
( 2 ) For all Flexible Bulk Containers, the load must be applied by one of the following methods: ( i ) Four Flexible Bulk Containers of the same type loaded to their maximum permissible gross mass and stacked on the test Flexible Bulk Container;
( ii ) The calculated superimposed test load weight loaded on either a flat plate or a reproduction of the base of the Flexible Bulk Container, which is stacked on the test Flexible Bulk Container.
( d ) *Criteria for passing the test.* There may be no deterioration that renders the Flexible Bulk Container unsafe for transportation and no loss of contents during the test or after removal of the test load.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viropro, Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Lee, acting as Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Richard Lee

_______________________________

Richard Lee, Sole Director and Officer

(acts as Chief  Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Date:  October 17, 2005.
§ 218.61 Authority to deactivate safety devices. ( a ) For the purpose of this chapter, it is lawful to temporarily render a safety device incapable of proper or effective action or to materially impair its function if this action is taken as provided for in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section.
( b ) If a locomotive is equipped with a device to assure that the operator is alert or not physically incapacitated, that device may be deactivated when: ( 1 ) The locomotive is not the controlling locomotive;
( 2 ) The locomotive is performing switching operations and not hauling cars in a manner that constitutes a train movement under part 232 of this chapter:
( 3 ) The locomotive is dead-in-tow; or
( 4 ) The locomotive is a mid-train slave unit being controlled by radio from a remote location.
( c ) If a locomotive in commuter or intercity passenger service is equipped with a device to record data concerning the operation of that locomotive or the train it is powering, that device may be deactivated only under the provisions of § 229.135 of this chapter. Inward- and outward-facing image recording devices on commuter or intercity passenger locomotives may be deactivated only under the provisions of § 229.136 of this chapter. This section does not apply to inward- or outward-facing image recording devices that are installed on freight locomotives.
[54 FR 5492, Feb. 3, 1989, as amended at 58 FR 36613, July 8, 1993; 88 FR 70760, Oct. 12, 2023]
1

Clarified Equations P r esented in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) for the Test Procedure for Commercial Refrigeration Equipment (RIN 1904

- AC40) published in the Federal Register on November 24, 2010 , 75 FR 71596

. Eq. 1 found on 75 FR 71603 and in the rule language on 75 FR 71612 :

Eq. 2 found on page 75 FR 71604:

Eq. 3 found on page 75 FR 71604:

Eq. 4 found on page 75 FR 71604 and in the rule language on 75 FR 71612 :

Eq. 5 found on page 75 FR 71605:

Eq. 6 found on page 75 FR 71605:

Eq. 7 found on page 75 FR 71605 and in the rule language on 75 FR 71612 :
Date: Februa ry 13, 2015 

Meeting: Methane Emission Proposal 

Rule(s) Discussed: 

Written Materials? Yes/No 

I ~ 

Name Organization Phone N urn ber 

~L GurvNTV. J C-- EPA ~'J...-3 '7' J .rr;s ro 

r. A{(_£_ 1 o y L- , ~ E f !\ I ~ 0 ). . .s t-(:>./ - 1 (;- " 1 

I f/lAJ;t_ /) ' EJ)~ 5f/JN & 32 - '-lf3 - 1'1 f)£ 

I {/t€ ~~n__ J kf/4-- ?dL 5bc; 7)/tJfL 

t ~ ()(! I 

I I 

-

I 

[ 

I I 1-

I 

I I
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6239

RADHWAN AL-HAMOOD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:20-hc-02220-BO)

Submitted: September 30, 2022 Decided: November 3, 2022

Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Radhwan Al-Hamood, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6239 Doc: 5 Filed: 11/03/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Radhwan Al-Hamood seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Al-Hamood has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6239 Doc: 5 Filed: 11/03/2022 Pg: 2 of 2