[Cite as Morris v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2011-Ohio-7016.]

Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 

65 South Front Street, Third Floor 

Columbus, OH 43215 

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 

www.cco.state.oh.us 

KENNETH MORRIS 

 Plaintiff 

 v. 

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTIONS 

 Defendant 

Case No. 2011-02646-AD 

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert 

MEMORANDUM DECISION 

FINDINGS OF FACT 

{¶1} On October 21, 2010, plaintiff, Kenneth Morris, an inmate formerly 

incarcerated at defendant’s Hocking Correctional Facility (HCF) was transferred from 

the general population to a segregation unit at approximately 1:30 p.m. 

{¶2} Plaintiff's personal property was packed and delivered into the custody of 

HCF staff incident to the transfer. Plaintiff alleges that when he was released from 

segregation, some of his property items were missing. Plaintiff listed the following items 

as missing: two pair of scissors ($2.40), one Sentry AM/FM cassette player ($20.95), 

one TV headphones splitter ($4.42), one RC cola ($.51), one toenail clipper ($1.02), and 

one fingernail clipper ($.77). 

{¶3} Plaintiff asserted his property was lost or destroyed as a proximate result 

of negligence on the part of HCF personnel and he has consequently filed this 

complaint seeking damages in the amount of $30.07, the estimated replacement value 

of the property. Payment of the filing fee was waived. 

{¶4} Plaintiff submitted an inmate property record dated October 21, 2010, 

which lists a Sentry cassette player and two headphones, but does not indicate that any 
scissors, cola, or nail clippers were located during the pack-up process. 

{¶5} In the investigation report defendant admitted “liability for the loss of the 

cassette player and headphone splitter for a total of $25.37.” The defendant specifically 

denied liability for the other items listed by plaintiff. 

{¶6} Plaintiff did not file a response. 

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 

{¶7} In order to prevail, plaintiff must prove, by a preponderance of the 

evidence, that defendant owed him a duty, that defendant breached that duty, and that 

defendant’s breach proximately caused his injuries. Armstrong v. Best Buy Company, 

Inc., 99 Ohio St. 3d 79, 2003-Ohio-2573,¶8 citing Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, 

Inc. (1984), 15 Ohio St. 3d 75, 77, 15 OBR 179, 472 N.E. 2d 707. 

{¶8} “Whether a duty is breached and whether the breach proximately caused an 

injury are normally questions of fact, to be decided by . . . the court . . .” Pacher v. 

Invisible Fence of Dayton, 154 Ohio App. 3d 744, 2003-Ohio-5333, ¶41, citing Miller v. 

Paulson (1994), 97 Ohio App. 3d 217, 221, 646 N.E. 2d 521; Mussivand v. David

(1989), 45 Ohio St. 3d 314, 318, 544 N.E. 2d 265. 

{¶9} Although not strictly responsible for a prisoner’s property, defendant had at 

least the duty of using the same degree of care as it would use with its own property. 

Henderson v. Southern Ohio Correctional Facility (1979), 76-0356-AD. 

{¶10} This court in Mullett v. Department of Correction (1976), 76-0292-AD, 

held that defendant does not have the liability of an insurer (i.e., is not liable without 

fault) with respect to inmate property, but that it does have the duty to make “reasonable 

attempts to protect, or recover” such property. 

{¶11} Plaintiff has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the 

evidence, that he suffered a loss and that this loss was proximately caused by 

defendant’s negligence. Barnum v. Ohio State University (1977), 76-0368-AD. 

{¶12} Plaintiff must produce evidence which affords a reasonable basis for 

the conclusion defendant’s conduct is more likely than not a substantial factor in 

bringing about the harm. Parks v. Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (1985), 

85-01546-AD. 

{¶13} In order to recover against a defendant in a tort action, plaintiff must 

produce evidence which furnishes a reasonable basis for sustaining his claim. If his 

evidence furnishes a basis for only a guess, among different possibilities, to any 
essential issue in the case, he fails to sustain the burden as to such issue. Landon v. 

Lee Motors, Inc. (1954), 161 Ohio St. 82, 53 O.O. 25, 118 N.E. 2d 147. 

{¶14} Plaintiff’s failure to prove delivery of the scissors, nail clippers and cola 

to defendant constitutes a failure to show imposition of a legal bailment duty on the part 

of defendant in respect to lost property. Prunty v. Department of Rehabilitation and 

Correction (1987), 86-02821-AD. 

{¶15} Negligence on the part of defendant has been shown in respect to the 

issue of protecting plaintiff’s property after he was transferred. Billups v. Department of 

Rehabilitation and Correction (2001), 2000-10634-AD, jud. 

{¶16} The standard measure of damages for personal property loss is market 

value. McDonald v. Ohio State Univ. Veterinary Hosp. (1994), 67 Ohio Misc. 2d 40, 644 

N.E. 2d 750. 

{¶17} As trier of fact, this court has the power to award reasonable damages 

based on evidence presented. Sims v. Southern Ohio Correctional Facility (1988), 61 

Ohio Misc. 2d 239, 577 N.E. 2d 160. 

{¶18} Damage assessment is a matter within the function of the trier of fact. 

Litchfield v. Morris (1985), 25 Ohio App. 3d 42, 25 OBR 115, 495 N.E. 2d 462. 

Reasonable certainty as to the amount of damages is required, which is that degree of 

certainty of which the nature of the case admits. Bemmes v. Pub. Emp. Retirement 

Sys. Of Ohio (1995), 102 Ohio App. 3d 782, 658 N.E. 2d 31. 

{¶19} Upon review of all the evidence submitted, the court finds plaintiff has 

suffered damages in the amount of $25.37. 
Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 

65 South Front Street, Third Floor 

Columbus, OH 43215 

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 

www.cco.state.oh.us 

KENNETH MORRIS 

 Plaintiff 

 v. 

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTIONS 

 Defendant 

Case No. 2011-02646-AD 

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert 

ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION 

 Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth 

in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor 

of plaintiff in the amount of $25.37. Court costs are assessed against defendant. 

 

 DANIEL R. BORCHERT 

 Deputy Clerk 

Entry cc: 

Kenneth Morris, #348-177 Gregory C. Trout, Chief Counsel 

16759 Snake Hollow Road Department of Rehabilitation 

P.O. Box 59 and Correction 

Nelsonville, Ohio 45764 770 West Broad Street 

 Columbus, Ohio 43222 

10/20 

Filed 10/25/11 

Sent to S.C. reporter 3/13/12