39788 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 139 / Friday, July 20, 2007 / Notices 

NSN: 7520–01–484–3908—Pencil, 

Mechanical, Push-Action (MD). 

NPA: San Antonio Lighthouse for the Blind, 

San Antonio, TX. 

Contracting Activity: General Services 

Administration, Office Supplies & Paper 

Products Acquisition Ctr, New York, NY. 

Services: 

Service Type/Location: Grounds 

Maintenance, Hill Air Force Base, Hill 

Air Force Base, UT. 

NPA: Pioneer Adult Rehabilitation Center 

Davis County School District, Clearfield, 

UT. 

Contracting Activity: Hill Air Force Base, UT. 

Service Type/Location: Janitorial/Custodial, 

Navy Exchange Command Accounting 

(CAC), Norfolk, VA. 

NPA: Didlake, Inc., Manassas, VA. 

Service Type/Location: Janitorial/Custodial, 

Navy Exchange Command Uniform 

Support Center, Bldg 1545, Crossways 

Blvd, Chesapeake, VA. 

NPA: Portco, Inc., Portsmouth, VA. 

Contracting Activity: Navy Exchange Service 

Command (NEXCOM), Virginia Beach, 

VA. 

Service Type/Location: Microfilming, 

Department of Treasury, Financial 

Management Services, Hyattsville, MD. 

NPA: Didlake, Inc., Manassas, VA. 

Contracting Activity: Department of the 

Treasury, Washington, DC. 

Kimberly M. Zeich, 

Director, Program Operations. 

[FR Doc. E7–14048 Filed 7–19–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6353–01–P 

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS 

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting 

of the Connecticut Advisory 

Committee 

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to 

the provisions of the rules and 

regulations of the U.S. Commission on 

Civil Rights (Commission), and the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act 

(FACA), that a planning meeting of the 

Connecticut Advisory Committee to the 

Commission will convene at 12 p.m. 

and adjourn at 2 p.m. on Thursday, 

August 2, 2007 in the conference room 

of Oak Hill, located at 120 Holcomb 

Street, Hartford, Connecticut. The 

purpose of the planning meeting is for 

the committee to discuss its school 

choice report and plan for the 

committee’s September briefing on 

school choice. 

Members of the public are entitled to 

submit written comments; the 

comments must be received in the 

Eastern Regional Office by August 9, 

2007. The address is 624 Ninth Street, 

NW., Suite 740, Washington, DC 20425. 

Persons wishing to e-mail their 

comments, or to present their comments 

verbally at the meeting, or who desire 

additional information should contact 

Barbara de La Viez, Civil Rights Analyst, 

Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 

Commission on Civil Rights at (202) 

376–7533 [TDY 202–376–8116], or by email at bdelaviez@usccr.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons who will 

attend the meeting and require the 

services of a sign language interpreter 

should contact the Regional Office at 

least ten (10) working days before the 

scheduled date of the meeting. 

Records generated from this meeting 

may be inspected and reproduced at the 

Eastern Regional Office, as they become 

available, both before and after the 

meeting. Persons interested in the work 

of this advisory committee are advised 

to go to the Commission’s Web site, 

http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the 

Eastern Regional Office at the above email or street address. 

The meeting will be conducted 

pursuant to the provisions of the rules 

and regulations of the Commission and 

FACA. 

Dated in Washington, DC, July 17, 2007. 

Ivy Davis, 

Acting Chief, Regional Programs 

Coordination Unit. 

[FR Doc. E7–14073 Filed 7–19–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Technical Advisory Committees; 

Notice of Recruitment of Private Sector 

Members 

SUMMARY: Six Technical Advisory 

Committees (TACs) advise the 

Department of Commerce on the 

technical parameters for export controls 

applicable to dual-use commodities and 

technology and on the administration of 

those controls. The TACs are composed 

of representatives from industry and 

Government representing diverse points 

of view on the concerns of the exporting 

community. Industry representatives are 

selected from firms producing a broad 

range of goods, technologies, and 

software presently controlled for 

national security, non-proliferation, 

foreign policy, and short supply reasons 

or that are proposed for such controls, 

balanced to the extent possible among 

large and small firms. 

TAC members are appointed by the 

Secretary of Commerce and serve terms 

of not more than four consecutive years. 

The membership reflects the 

Department’s commitment to attaining 

balance and diversity. TAC members 

must obtain secret-level clearances prior 

to appointment. These clearances are 

necessary so that members may be 

permitted access to the classified 

information needed to formulate 

recommendations to the Department of 

Commerce. Each TAC meets 

approximately 4 times per year. 

Members of the Committees will not be 

compensated for their services. The six 

TACs are responsible for advising the 

Department of Commerce on the 

technical parameters for export controls 

and the administration of those controls 

within the following areas: Information 

Systems TAC: Control List Categories 3 

(electronics), 4 (computers), and 5 

(telecommunications and information 

security); Materials TAC: Control List 

Category 1 (materials, chemicals, 

microorganisms, and toxins); Materials 

Processing Equipment TAC: Control List 

Category 2 (materials processing); 

Regulations and Procedures TAC: The 

Export Administration Regulations 

(EAR) and procedures for implementing 

the EAR; Sensors and Instrumentation 

TAC: Control List Category 6 (sensors 

and lasers); Transportation and Related 

Equipment TAC; Control List Categories 

7 (navigation and avionics), 8 (marine), 

and 9 (propulsion systems, space 

vehicles, and related equipment). To 

respond to this recruitment notice, 

please send a copy of your resume to 

Ms. Yvette Springer at 

Yspringer@bis.doc.gov. 

Deadline: This Notice of Recruitment 

will be open for one year from its date 

of publication in the Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Yvette Springer on (202) 482–2813. 

Dated: July 16, 2007. 

Yvette Springer, 

Committee Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 07–3544 Filed 7–19–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–JT–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–831] 

Amended Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: Fresh Garlic From the 

People’s Republic of China 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On June 22, 2007, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published in the 

Federal Register the final results of the 

eleventh administrative review and 

concurrent new shipper reviews of the 

antidumping duty order on fresh garlic 

from the Peoples Republic of China 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 139 / Friday, July 20, 2007 / Notices 39789 

1The companies subject to the administrative 

review which are receiving a separate rate are: Fook 

Huat Tong Kee Foodstuffs Co., Ltd.; Heze Ever-Best 

International Trade Co., Ltd.; Huaiyang Hongda 

Dehydrated Vegetable Company; Linshu Dading 

Private Agricultural Products Co., Ltd.; and Taiyan 

Ziyang Food Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘PRC’’). See Fresh Garlic from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results and Partial Rescission of the 

Eleventh Administrative Review and 

New Shipper Reviews, 72 FR 34438 

(June 22, 2007) ‘‘(Final Results’’) and 

accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. The period of review 

(‘‘POR’’) covered November 1, 2004, 

through October 31, 2005. We are 

amending our Final Results to correct 

ministerial errors made in the 

calculation of the antidumping duty 

margin for Jinxiang Shanyang Freezing 

Storage Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shanyang’’), 

pursuant to section 751(h) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’). 

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 20, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 9, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–6905. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 22, 2007, the Department 

published the Final Results and 

corresponding issues and decision 

memorandum. See ‘‘Memorandum from 

Stephen J. Caleys, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Import Administration, to 

David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary 

for Import Administration, Subject: 

Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh 

Garlic from the People’s Republic of 

China: Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Eleventh 

Administrative Review and New 

Shipper Reviews’’ (‘‘Final Decision 

Memo’’). 

On June 18, 2007, Fresh Garlic 

Producers Association and its 

individual members, Christopher Ranch 

L.L.C., the Garlic Company, Valley 

Garlic, and Vessey and Company, 

(‘‘Petitioners’’) submitted a letter 

requesting a two-day extension to 

submit ministerial error comments. 

Accordingly, the Department extended 

the deadline by two days to June 20, 

2007, to submit any ministerial error 

allegations with respect to the Final 

Results. On June 20, 2007, Shanyang 

filed timely clerical error allegations 

with respect to the Department’s 

antidumping duty margin calculation in 

the Final Results. On June 25, 2007, 

Petitioners filed timely rebuttal 

comments to Shanyang’s clerical error 

allegations. 

Scope to Order 

The products covered by this 

antidumping duty order are all grades of 

garlic, whole or separated into 

constituent cloves, whether or not 

peeled, fresh, chilled, frozen, 

provisionally preserved, or packed in 

water or other neutral substance, but not 

prepared or preserved by the addition of 

other ingredients or heat processing. 

The differences between grades are 

based on color, size, sheathing, and 

level of decay. The scope of this order 

does not include the following: (a) 

Garlic that has been mechanically 

harvested and that is primarily, but not 

exclusively, destined for non-fresh use; 

or (b) garlic that has been specially 

prepared and cultivated prior to 

planting and then harvested and 

otherwise prepared for use as seed. The 

subject merchandise is used principally 

as a food product and for seasoning. the 

subject garlic is currently classifiable 

under subheadings 0703.20.0010, 

0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090, 

0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750, 

0711.90.6000, and 2005.90.9700 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, our 

written description of the scope of this 

order is dispositive. In order to be 

excluded from the antidumping duty 

order, garlic entered under the HTSUS 

subheadings listed above that is: (1) 

Mechanically harvested and primarily, 

but not exclusively, destined for nonfresh use; or (2) specially prepared and 

cultivated prior to planting and then 

harvested and otherwise prepared for 

use as seed must be accompanied by 

declarations to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to that effect. 

Ministerial Errors 

A ministerial error is defined in 

section 751(h) of the Act and further 

clarified in 19 CFR 351.224(f) as ‘‘an 

error in addition, subtraction, or other 

arithmetic function, clerical error 

resulting from inaccurate copying, 

duplication, or the like, and any other 

similar type of unintentional error 

which the Secretary considers 

ministerial.’’

After analyzing all interested parties’

comments, we have determined, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(e), that 

ministerial errors existed in certain 

calculations for Shanyang in the Final 

Results. Correction of these errors 

results in a change to Shanyang’s final 

antidumping duty margin. Additionally, 

the rate change for Shanyang also affects 

the deposit rates for the companies 

subject to the administrative review 

which are receiving a separate rate.1 The 

rate for the PRC-wide entity remains 

unchanged. For a detailed discussion of 

these ministerial errors, as well as the 

Department’s analysis, see 

‘‘Memorandum to James C. Doyle, 

Director, Office 9, Import 

Administration, through Alex 

Villanueva, Program Manager, Office 9, 

Import Administration, from Irene 

Gorelik, Case Analyst, Office 9, Subject: 

Analysis of Ministerial Error 

Allegations,’’ (July 12, 2007) 

(‘‘Ministerial Error Allegation 

Memorandum’’). the Ministerial Error 

Allegation Memorandum is on file in 

the Central Records Unit, room B–099 in 

the main Department building. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), 

we are amending the Final Results of the 

administrative review of fresh garlic 

from the PRC. The revised weightedaverage dumping margins are detailed 

below. For company-specific 

calculation, see ‘‘Memorandum from 

Irene Gorelik, Case Analyst, through 

Alex Villanueva, to the File, Subject: 

Analysis Memorandum for the 

Amended Final Results for Shanyang,’’

(July 12, 2007). The revised final 

weighted-average dumping margins are 

as follows: 

FRESH GARLIC FROM THE PRC-WEIGHTED-AVERAGE DUMPING MARGINS

Manufacturer exporter 

Weighted-average 

deposit rate 

(percent) 

Jinxiang Shanyang Freezing Storage Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................... 24.73 

Fook Huat Tong Kee Foodstuffs Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................... 9.84 

Heze Ever-Best International Trade Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................. 9.84 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

39790 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 139 / Friday, July 20, 2007 / Notices 

1Section A of the questionnaire requests general 

information concerning a company’s corporate 

structure and business practices, the merchandise 

under review that it sells, and the manner in which 

it sells that merchandise in all of its markets. 

Section B requests a complete listing of all home 

market sales, or, if the home market is not viable, 

of sales in the most appropriate third-country 

market (this Section is not applicable to 

respondents in non-market economy cases). Section 

C requests a complete listing of U.S. sales. Section 

D requests information on the cost of production of 

the foreign like product and the constructed value 

of the merchandise under review. Section E 

requests information on further manufacturing. 

FRESH GARLIC FROM THE PRC-WEIGHTED-AVERAGE DUMPING MARGINS—Continued 

Manufacturer exporter 

Weighted-average 

deposit rate 

(percent) 

Huaiyang Hongda Dehydrated Vegetable Company .................................................................................................................. 9.84 

Linshu Dading Private Agricultural Products Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................. 9.84 

Taiyan Ziyang Food Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................................................... 9.84 

The Department shall determine, and 

CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on 

all appropriate entries based on the 

amended final results. For details on the 

assessment of antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries, see Final Results. 

These amended final results are 

published in accordance with section 

751(h) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: July 12, 2007. 

David A. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 07–3518 Filed 7–19–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–475–703) 

Notice of Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: Granular 

Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From 

Italy 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 20, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Salim Bhabhrawala, at (202) 482–1784; 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on granular 

polytetrafluoroethylene resin (PTFE) 

from Italy, covering the period August 1, 

2005, through July 31, 2006. We 

preliminarily determine that sales of 

subject merchandise by Solvay Solexis, 

Inc. and Solvay Solexis S.p.A 

(collectively, Solvay) have been made 

below normal value (NV). If these 

preliminary results are adopted in our 

final results, we will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

assess antidumping duties on 

appropriate entries based on the 

difference between the export price (EP) 

and the NV. Interested parties are 

invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 30, 1988, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

antidumping duty order on granular 

PTFE resin from Italy. See Antidumping 

Duty Order; Granular 

Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from Italy, 

53 FR 33163 (August 30, 1988). On 

August 1, 2005, the Department issued 

a notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of this order. See 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review, 71 FR 43441–

43443 (August 1, 2006). In accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.213(b), Solvay 

requested an administrative review. On 

September 29, 2006, the Department 

published the notice of initiation of this 

antidumping duty administrative 

review, covering the period August 1, 

2005, through July 31, 2006 (the period 

of review, or POR). See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews, 71 FR 57465 

(September 29, 2006). 

On September 29, 2006, the 

Department issued its antidumping 

questionnaire to Solvay, specifying that 

the responses to Section A and Sections 

B–E would be due on October 20, 2006, 

and November 6, 2006, respectively.1

The Department received timely 

responses to Sections A–D of the initial 

antidumping questionnaire and 

associated supplemental questionnaires. 

On May 1, 2007, the Department 

published a notice of a 71-day extension 

of the preliminary results of this 

administrative review. See Granular 

Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From 

Italy: Notice of Extension of Time Limit 

for the Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 72 FR 23802. This notice 

extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results to July 13, 2007. 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by this order is 

granular PTFE resin, filled or unfilled. 

This order also covers PTFE wet raw 

polymer exported from Italy to the 

United States. See Granular 

Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From 

Italy; Final Affirmative Determination of 

Circumvention of Antidumping Duty 

Order, 58 FR 26100 (April 30, 1993). 

This order excludes PTFE dispersions in 

water and fine powders. During the 

period covered by this review, such 

merchandise was classified under item 

number 3904.61.00 of the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS). We are providing this HTSUS 

number for convenience and CBP 

purposes only. The written description 

of the scope remains dispositive. 

Fair Value Comparisons 

We compared the constructed export 

price (CEP) to the NV, as described in 

the Constructed Export Price and 

Normal Value sections of this notice. 

Pursuant to section 777A(d)(2) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

we compared the CEPs of individual 

transactions to contemporaneous 

monthly weighted–average prices of 

sales of the foreign like product. 

We first attempted to compare 

contemporaneous sales of products sold 

in the United States and the comparison 

market that were identical with respect 

to the following characteristics: type, 

filler, percentage of filler, and grade. 

Where we were unable to compare sales 

of identical merchandise, we compared 

U.S. sales with comparison market sales 

of the most similar merchandise. 

Constructed Export Price 

For all sales to the United States, we 

calculated CEP, as defined in section 

772(b) of the Act, because all sales to 

unaffiliated parties were made after 

importation of the subject merchandise 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES