alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: viandma@aol.com [mailto:viandma@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:54 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Maha Shakhashiri 

304 E. Brunswick Street 

Sterling, VA 20164
-----Original Message----- 

From: bsens25531@aol.com [mailto:bsens25531@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:09 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Beth Holloway 

791 Lakemont Drive 

Southaven, MS 38672
-----Original Message----- 

From: pattysiedler@yahoo.com [mailto:pattysiedler@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 9:29 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Patty Siedler 

1653 SW 33rd Street 

Redmond, OR 97756
From: imajaning@gmail.com [mailto:imajaning@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:53 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jan Messinger 

9906 68th Street 

Kenosha, WI 53142
From: aprilfool1950@hotmail.com [mailto:aprilfool1950@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:28 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

lois merriman 

6485 s shore dr 

bear lake, MI 49614
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 29, 1995 (123), Para 123.22 Order of Business--Consideration of Conference Report--S. 895]
[Page 1490]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.123.22  order of business--consideration of conference report--s. 
          895

  On motion of Mrs. MEYERS, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That it may be in order to immediately consider the 
conference report to accompany the bill of the Senate (S. 895) to amend 
the Small Business Act to reduce the level of participation by the Small 
Business Administration in certain loans guaranteed by the 
Administration, and for other purposes, that the conference report be 
considered as read, and that debate thereon be limited to ten minutes 
equally divided and controlled by Mrs. Meyers and Mr. Skelton.
```
#### § 220.303 General use of electronic devices.

A railroad operating employee shall not use an electronic device if that use would interfere with the employee's or another railroad operating employee's performance of safety-related duties. No individual in the cab of a controlling locomotive shall use an electronic device if that use would interfere with a railroad operating employee's performance of safety-related duties.
98-834.

#### State ex rel. McIntosh v. Osnaburg Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

Stark App. Nos. 97CA50, 97CA56 and 97CA60. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Stark County. Upon consideration of appellants’ motion for enlargement of time allocated for oral argument,

IT IS ORDERED by court that the motion be, and hereby is, granted, to the extent that oral argument is extended to twenty minutes per side.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Somanetics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), we, Bruce J. Barrett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and William M. Iacona, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
Controller and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.   the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Dated: April 3, 2007                   /s/ Bruce J. Barrett
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Bruce J. Barrett,
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: April 3, 2007                   /s/ William M. Iacona
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       William M. Iacona,
                                       Vice President and Chief Financial
                                       Officer, Controller and Treasurer
#### Charlie WEST, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 17266.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 24, 1958.

S. B. Wallace, Griffin, Ga., for appellant.

*869James W. Dorsey, U. S. Atty., J. Robert Sparks, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of possessing liquor on which the Federal tax had not been paid, in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. § 5008, and of removing, depositing and concealing the liquor in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. § 7206. He has appealed from the conviction.

Appellant complains of the search and seizure of the automobile in which the liquor was found. The search and seizure were made by officers of the State of Georgia acting independently. The search and seizure were not invalid under the Federal law. Scotti v. United States, 5 Cir., 1952, 193 F.2d 644; Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383, 34 S.Ct. 341, 58 L.Ed. 652.

Over appellant’s objection one of the State officers who participated in the arrest was permitted to testify that the appellant had offered him a bribe not to make a Federal case. The court properly cautioned the jury as to the consideration which might be given to such evidence. No error was committed. Montgomery v. United States, 5 Cir., 1953, 203 F.2d 887; Hubby v. United States, 5 Cir., 1945, 150 F.2d 165.

The appellant was taken from Fayetteville, Georgia, which is distant about three miles from the place of the arrest, to Atlanta, where the office of the United States Commissioner was located. En route the appellant made statements to the officers admitting the ownership of the liquor. Testimony as to the statement was admitted in evidence. The appellant, relying upon McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332, 63 S.Ct. 608, 87 L. Ed. 819 and Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449, 77 S.Ct. 1356, 1 L.Ed.2d 1479, asserts this was error and that a confession obtained before taking a prisoner before a Commissioner is invalid. Here there was no delay in bringing the appellant before the Commissioner. The confession was shown to have been voluntarily made and no evidence indicated otherwise. The rule of the Mc-Nabb and Mallory cases does not apply. United States v. Mitchell, 322 U.S. 65, 64 S.Ct. 896, 88 L.Ed. 1140; Perry v. United States, 1957, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 315, 253 F.2d 337, certiorari denied 356 U.S. 941, 78 S.Ct. 785, 2 L.Ed.2d 816.

The officers testified that all of the confiscated liquor was destroyed except one jar which was taken to a laboratory for analysis. There is no merit in the appellant’s contention that the officers’ testimony about the liquor was not the best evidence. Dicks v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 253 F.2d 713.

Finding no merit in the claims of the appellant, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
§ 199.209 Other requirements imposed by operators. ( a ) Except as expressly provided in this subpart, nothing in this subpart shall be construed to affect the authority of operators, or the rights of employees, with respect to the use or possession of alcohol, including authority and rights with respect to alcohol testing and rehabilitation.
( b ) Operators may, but are not required to, conduct pre-employment alcohol testing under this subpart. Each operator that conducts pre-employment alcohol testing must— ( 1 ) Conduct a pre-employment alcohol test before the first performance of covered functions by every covered employee (whether a new employee or someone who has transferred to a position involving the performance of covered functions);
( 2 ) Treat all covered employees the same for the purpose of pre-employment alcohol testing (*i.e.*, you must not test some covered employees and not others);
( 3 ) Conduct the pre-employment tests after making a contingent offer of employment or transfer, subject to the employee passing the pre-employment alcohol test;
( 4 ) Conduct all pre-employment alcohol tests using the alcohol testing procedures in DOT Procedures; and
( 5 ) Not allow any covered employee to begin performing covered functions unless the result of the employee's test indicates an alcohol concentration of less than 0.04.
[Amdt. 199-9, 59 FR 7430, Feb. 15, 1994, as amended by Amdt. 199-19, 66 FR 47119, Sept. 11, 2001]
Docket: EBSA-2009-0010 

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

Comment On: EBSA-2009-0010-0409 

Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 

2008 

Document: EBSA-2009-0010-DRAFT-0586 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-2167 

Submitter Information 

Name: Amanda Eileen Jones 

Address: 

30 Roosevelt Avenue 

Binghamton, NY, 13901 

Email: ajones10@stny.rr.com 

Phone: 607-321-4452 

Organization: Mental Health Association of the Southern Tier, Binghamton, NY (Volunteer) 

General Comment 

I am writing to comment on the the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity 

Act of 2008 (Document ID EBSA-2009-0010-0409). As a consumer, a volunteer, and a social worker, I feel that 

this legislation is important to putting those with mental illnesses at the same level as those with physical 

illnesses. So many people in this country do not get appropriate mental health services and this act will make it 

easier for those who are afflicted with a stigmatizing illness to reach out and get the help that they need and 

deserve. 

Thank you for your time, 

Amanda Jones, MSW 

Binghamton, NY 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: April 27, 2010 

Received: April 26, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ae0bb7 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web
§ 179.200-21 Closures for openings. ( a ) All plugs shall be solid, with NPT threads, and shall be of a length which will screw at least 6 threads inside the face of fitting or tank. Plugs, when inserted from the outside of tank heads, shall have the letter “S” at least 3 ⁄ 8 inch in size stamped with steel stamp or cast on the outside surface to indicate the plug is solid.
( b ) [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 163 (Thursday, August 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 48307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4129]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Interchangeable Virtual Instruments 
Foundations, Inc

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 25, 2007, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. section 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Interchangeable Virtual 
Instruments Foundation, Inc. has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Elgar Electronics in San Diego, CA has 
changed its name to Xantrex Technology, Inc.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Interchangeable Virtual Instruments 
Foundation, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications 
disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 29, 2001, Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundations, 
Inc. filed its original notifications pursuant to Section 6(a) of the 
Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal 
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 30, 2001 (66 FR 
39336).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 8, 2007. 
A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) 
of the Act on July 13, 2007 (72 FR 38617).

J. Robert Kramer, II,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-4129 Filed 8-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
-----Original Message----- 

From: marthaal@msn.com [mailto:marthaal@msn.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:25 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

CONSIDER YOURSELF TRULY BLESSED IF YOU OR A LOVED ONE DO NOT SUFFER 

FROM A MENTAL ILLNESS.THOSE WHO SUFFER FROM ANY OF THESES TERRIFYING 

MALADIES NEEDS AND DESERVES TREATMENT JUST AS ANYONES SUFFERING FROM A 

PURESLY PHYSICAL ONE. THE TIME HAS COME TO STOP THIS UNFAIR AND OBSCENE 

DISCRIMINATION. 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Martha Devernoe 

9102 Kingston Rd 

Bradenton, FL 34210
§ 178.817 Righting test. ( a ) *General.* The righting test must be conducted for the qualification of all flexible IBCs designed to be lifted from the top or side.
( b ) *Special preparation for the righting test.* The flexible IBC must be filled to not less than 95 percent of its capacity and to its maximum net mass, with the load being evenly distributed.
( c ) *Test method.* The flexible IBC, lying on its side, must be lifted at a speed of at least 0.1 m/second (0.33 ft/s) to an upright position, clear of the floor, by one lifting device, or by two lifting devices when four are provided.
( d ) *Criterion for passing the test.* For all flexible IBCs, there may be no damage to the IBC or its lifting devices which renders the IBC unsafe for transportation or handling.
[Amdt. 178-103, 59 FR 38074, July 26, 1994, as amended at 66 FR 45386, Aug. 28, 2001]
-----Original Message----- 

From: neodell@chiconet.com [mailto:neodell@chiconet.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:13 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Norma Odell 

9Lakeshore Dr. 

Chico, CA 95928
-----Original Message----- 

From: susiqpug@hotmail.com [mailto:susiqpug@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:51 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I feel this is a "no-brainer". 

Please support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies 

from charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other types of 

physical health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care 

and physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Anne Galle 

10409 Clyburn Pk NE 

Albuquerque, NM 87123
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation 2006 Key Employee Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.18 
 CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION 
 2006 KEY EMPLOYEE BONUS PLAN (KEBP) SUMMARY 
 Article 1—Plan Objective 

	1.1	The objective of the Key Employee Bonus Plan (KEBP) is to provide incentives to key Cypress employees based on the Company’s quarterly earnings per share (EPS) performance, the
Corporate plan and individual milestone performance (CSFs). 

 Article 2—Eligibility for Plan Participation 

	2.1	Initial eligibility for the KEBP is based on pay grade, and is subject to approval by the President/CEO. Any exception to eligibility based on pay grade criteria must be reviewed
and approved by the CEO. 

 Article 3—Bonus Plans and Calculations 

	3.1	Each plan participant is given an incentive level target which ranges from 20%-80% of the individual’s base salary. Bonuses may be earned for quarterly performance as well as
annual performance. 

  

	3.2	The participant’s actual bonus will be based on the individual’s quarterly individual milestone performance, annual individual milestone performance as well as the
Company’s quarterly EPS performance, as measured against the Company’s EPS Plan for each quarter. Specifically, the individual’s base pay will be multiplied by their incentive level divided by the number of bonus periods multiplied by
the Company EPS factor times the individual’s milestone achievement factor. 

  

	3.3	There will be no payout in any period where the Actual EPS is less than or equal to zero. 

  

	3.4	Bonus payouts cannot exceed 200% of the employee’s designated incentive target in any one year. 

 Article 4—Milestone Achievement 

	4.1	Milestone setting and the determination of achievement remains subject to the approval of the individual’s manager. 

  

	4.2	Milestone achievement by the CEO and executive staff for each organization within the Company will affect the % milestone achievement calculation used to determine individual KEBP
payments. 

 Article 5—Eligibility for Payment 

	5.1	To be eligible for any portion of the bonus payment, the participant must be employed by the company on the first day of any quarter in which a bonus is earned and on the scheduled
payment date. A participant who terminates employment prior to the payment date will forfeit the bonus.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2009 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2009

  To amend title 5, United States Code, to include medical foods as a 
  specific item for which coverage may be provided under the Federal 
                   Employees Health Benefits Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 1995

 Ms. Woolsey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, to include medical foods as a 
  specific item for which coverage may be provided under the Federal 
                   Employees Health Benefits Program.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEDICAL FOODS.

    Section 8904(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(E) by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``, including with respect to medical foods (as 
        defined by section 5(b)(3) of the Orphan Drug Act).''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)(F) by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``, including medical foods (as defined by 
        section 5(b)(3) of the Orphan Drug Act).''.
                                 <all>
```