alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: aliciawells@mac.com [mailto:aliciawells@mac.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:47 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

alicia wells 

70 cartier aisle 

irvine, CA 92620
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 17, 1995 (95), Para 95.30 Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1140]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.95.30  public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 5 of rule X and clause 4 of rule XXII, public bills and 
resolutions were introduced and severally referred as follows:

           By Mr. WALKER (for himself, and Mr. Sensenbrenner):
       H.R. 2043. A bill to authorize appropriations to the 
     National Aeronautics and Space Administration for human space 
     flight, science, aeronautics, and technology, mission 
     support, and inspector general, and for other purposes; to 
     the Committee on Science.
           By Mr. ACKERMAN (for himself, Mr. King, Mr. Lazio of 
             New York, Mr. Frisa, and Mr. Forbes):
       H.R. 2044. A bill to remove police officers employed by the 
     Long Island Rail Road Company from coverage under the 
     Employer's Liability Act, the Railway Labor Act, the Railroad 
     Retirement Act, and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, 
     and for other purposes; to the Committee on Transportation 
     and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Ways 
     and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
     Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
     fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
           By Mr. CRANE (for himself, Mr. Gibbons, and Ms. Dunn of 
             Washington):
       H.R. 2045. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 
     1986 to provide tax treatment for foreign investment through 
     a U.S. regulated investment company comparable to the tax 
     treatment for direct foreign investment and investment 
     through a foreign mutual fund; to the Committee on Ways and 
     Means.
           By Mr. REED:
       H.R. 2046. A bill to amend the Coastal Zone Management Act 
     of 1972 to authorize grants to coastal States for development 
     of State coastal zone management program changes to support 
     adoption of procedures and policies to evaluate and 
     facilitate siting of certain aquaculture facilities in the 
     coastal zone, and to establish in the National Oceanic and 
     Atmospheric Administration a marine aquaculture development 
     program to be known as the Nantucket Program; to the 
     Committee on Resources.
           By Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Lipinski, 
             Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Wolf, Mr. King, and Mr. 
             Salmon):
       H.R. 2047. A bill concerning the Fourth World Conference on 
     Women in Beijing; to the Committee on International 
     Relations.
           By Mr. BREWSTER:
       H. Res. 191. Resolution amending the Rules of the House of 
     Representatives to require the reduction of section 602(b)(1) 
     suballocations to reflect floor amendments to general 
     appropriation bills, and for other purposes; to the Committee 
     on Rules.
```
From: fm.schutzer@sbcglobal.net [mailto:fm.schutzer@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:55 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Fran Schutzer 

2126 Hillcrest Road 

Redwood City, CA 94062
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 23, 1995 (71), Para 71.15 Adjournment]
[Page 807]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.71.15  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. SMITH of Michigan, at 7 o'clock and 7 minutes p.m., 
the House adjourned.
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20704 Summary Calendar

HOWARD JOHNSON,

Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant,

versus

CLARENCE O’NEAL BRADFORD; MICHAEL R. BURDICK; SERGEANT DESIMERLY; D. ELDER; HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT NARCOTICS TASK FORCE UNIT #19; SMITH, Detective; DOYLE, Detective; JOHN DOE I, Officer; JOHN DOE II, Officer,

Defendants-Appellees,

DOUGLAS MACNAUL,

Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CV-1660

-------------------- November 26, 2002

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Howard Johnson, Texas state prisoner # 785828, is

appealing the district court’s orders granting the defendants’

motions for summary judgment and dismissing his complaint. ThisNo. 01-20704 -2-

court “examine[s] the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion,

if necessary.” M osley v. Cozby
, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987).

The record raises a question regarding the timeliness of Johnson’s

not ice of appeal, which requires a limited remand of the case to

the district court for a determination of the date on which Johnson

submitted for filing his notice of appeal.

The district court entered a final judgment on April 25,

2001, and Johnson’s notice of appeal, which was undated, was not

filed in the record until July 2, 2001. Thus, the appeal from the

underlying judgment was not timely unless Johnson delivered the

notice of appeal to prison officials for forwarding to the court by

May 25, 2001. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A).

On remand, the district court must determine whether

Johnson’s notice of appeal was deposited in the prison mailing

syste m within 30 days of the entry of the order denying the

postjudgment motions, which would be on or before June 25, 2001.

See Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).

This court retain s jurisdiction over the appeal except

for the purposes of the limited remand stated above.

LIMITED REMAND FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATIONS.
-----Original Message----- 

From: kldey@charter.net [mailto:kldey@charter.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:13 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Karen Dey 

1013 South Bartlett Street 

Shawano, WI 54166
From: sharon.osmond@gmail.com [mailto:sharon.osmond@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:51 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sharon Osmond 

5548 Lawton Ave. 

Oakland, CA 94618
# EUR-Lex - 52003XC0807(02) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52003XC0807(02)

**Publication of a request pursuant to Article 9 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 to amend one or more parts of the specification of a name registered pursuant to Article 17 or Article 6 of that Regulation **

*
Official Journal C 187 , 07/08/2003 P. 0007 - 0008 *

Publication of a request pursuant to Article 9 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 to amend one or more parts of the specification of a name registered pursuant to Article 17 or Article 6 of that Regulation

(2003/C 187/03)

Publication confers the right to object within the meaning of Articles 7 and 12d of the Regulation. Any objections to this request must be forwarded via the competent authority of a Member State, a WTO Member country or a third country recognised under Article 12(3) within six months of the publication date.

The amendment is not a minor one and it must therefore be published under Article 6(2) of the Regulation.

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 2081/92

APPLICATION TO AMEND A SPECIFICATION: ARTICLE 9

1. Registered name: "Les Garrigues"

2. Responsible department in the Member State Name: Subdirección General de Denominaciones de Calidad y Relaciones Interprofesionales y Contractuales. Dirección General de Alimentación. Subsecretaría de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación del Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación

Address: Paseo Infanta Isabel, 1 - E-28071 Madrid

Tel. (34) 913 47 53 94

Fax (34) 913 47 54 10

3. Amendments requested - specification heading:

[square ] name

[square ] description

>PIC FILE= "C_2003187EN.000702.TIF">

geographical area

[square ] proof of origin

[square ] method of production

[square ] link

[square ] labelling

[square ] national requirements

- amendments:

The geographical area covered by this designation is to be extended to include the following municipalities:

>TABLE>

From the point of view of the link with the environment (historical, soil, relief and climatic factors), the geographical area to be extended continues to demonstrate a cohesion and degree of homogeneity similar to what it had prior to the requested extension (initial PDO) and fulfils all the basic requirements set out in the specification for this protected designation of origin listed in the Community register, producing an extra virgin olive oil with the same characteristics as the protected olive oil.

4. Date of receipt of the full application: 19.2.2003.
#### In the Matter of the Assignment of S. Frederick Mills et al., Individually and as Members of the Firm of Mills Brothers *&*Company. Edward Harding, as Assignee, et al., Appellants; Richard A. Canfield, Respondent.

*Matter of Mills,*139 App. Div. 54, affirmed,

(Argued January 3, 1911;

decided January 17, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 10, 1910, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming the report of a referee and awarding to the respondent herein certain property in the hands of the assignee in a special proceeding under the Assignment Act to determine its ownership.

*Douglas Campbell*for appellants.

*H. S. Marshall*and *George Gordon Battle*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Werner, Willard. Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Steven W. King, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report of Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc.







By:
/s/ STEVEN W. KINGName:
Steven W. KingTitle:
President, Chief Executive Officer, and DirectorDate:
March 11, 2010










I, Paul J. Lytle, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report of Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc.











By:
/s/ PAUL J. LYTLEName:
Paul J. LytleTitle:
Chief Financial OfficerDate:
March 11, 2010











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This Certification is being furnished pursuant to Rule 15(d) and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
-----Original Message----- 

From: larso188@tc.umn.edu [mailto:larso188@tc.umn.edu] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:29 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

j mallo 

14000 Forest Hill Road 

Eden Pr, MN 55346
<PAGE>


Exhibit 11.1

<TABLE>
                                          COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<CAPTION>
                                                               Three Months Ended             Nine Months Ended
                                                                  September 30,                 September 30,
                                                          ----------------------------  -----------------------------
                                                              2001            2000          2001            2000
                                                          -------------  -------------  -------------   -------------
                                                                 (In thousands, except share and per share data)

<S>                                                       <C>            <C>            <C>             <C>
Average common shares outstanding....................         8,955,753      6,105,124      8,910,966       6,105,821

Average common stock equivalents of
   warrants and options outstanding -
   based on the treasury stock method
   using market price................................           186,028         19,640         91,211          27,834
                                                          -------------  -------------  -------------   -------------

Average diluted common shares outstanding............         9,141,781      6,124,764      9,002,177       6,133,655
                                                          =============  =============  =============   =============

Net income...........................................     $       2,897  $       1,704  $       8,262   $       4,925

Basic earnings per common share......................              0.32           0.28           0.93            0.81

Diluted earnings per common share....................              0.32           0.28           0.92            0.80
</TABLE>
§ 58.60-2 Alternatives and substitutions. ( a ) The Coast Guard may accept substitutes for fittings, material, apparatus, equipment, arrangements, calculations, and tests required in this subpart if the substitute provides an equivalent level of safety.
( b ) In any case where it is shown to the satisfaction of the Commandant that the use of any particular equipment, apparatus, arrangement, or test is unreasonable or impracticable, the Commandant may permit the use of alternate equipment, apparatus, arrangement, or test to such an extent and upon such condition as will insure, to his satisfaction, a degree of safety consistent with the minimum standards set forth in this subpart.
§ 194.101 Operators required to submit plans. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, unless OPS grants a request from an Federal On-Scene Coordinator (FOSC) to require an operator of a pipeline in paragraph (b) to submit a response plan, each operator of an onshore pipeline facility shall prepare and submit a response plan to PHMSA as provided in § 194.119. A pipeline which does not meet the criteria for significant and substantial harm as defined in § 194.103(c) and is not eligible for an exception under § 194.101(b), can be expected to cause substantial harm. Operators of substantial harm pipeline facilities must prepare and submit plans to PHMSA for review.
( b ) *Exception.* An operator need not submit a response plan for: ( 1 ) A pipeline that is 65 ⁄ 8 inches (168 millimeters) or less in outside nominal diameter, is 10 miles (16 kilometers) or less in length, and all of the following conditions apply to the pipeline: ( i ) The pipeline has not experienced a release greater than 1,000 barrels (159 cubic meters) within the previous five years,
( ii ) The pipeline has not experienced at least two reportable releases, as defined in § 195.50, within the previous five years,
( iii ) A pipeline containing any electric resistance welded pipe, manufactured prior to 1970, does not operate at a maximum operating pressure established under § 195.406 that corresponds to a stress level greater than 50 percent of the specified minimum yield strength of the pipe, and
( iv ) The pipeline is not in proximity to navigable waters, public drinking water intakes, or environmentally sensitive areas.
( 2 ) ( i ) A line section that is greater than 65 ⁄ 8 inches in outside nominal diameter and is greater than 10 miles in length, where the operator determines that it is unlikely that the worst case discharge from any point on the line section would adversely affect, within 12 hours after the initiation of the discharge, any navigable waters, public drinking water intake, or environmentally sensitive areas.
( ii ) A line section that is 65 ⁄ 8 inches (168 millimeters) or less in outside nominal diameter and is 10 miles (16 kilometers) or less in length, where the operator determines that it is unlikely that the worst case discharge from any point on the line section would adversely affect, within 4 hours after the initiation of the discharge, any navigable waters, public drinking water intake, or environmentally sensitive areas.
[58 FR 253, Jan. 5, 1993, as amended by Amdt. 194-3, 63 FR 37505, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 194-4, 70 FR 8747, Feb. 23, 2005; 70 FR 11140, Mar. 8, 2005]
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Actions under delegated authority

## Actions taken during the week ending August 4, 2012

----

Bank Branches, DomesticRichmond          Middleburg Bank, Middleburg, Virginia -- to establish a branch at 315 Libbie Avenue, Richmond.            -Approved, July 30, 2012            Bank Holding CompaniesChicago          Heartland Bancorp, Inc., Bloomington, Illinois -- to acquire Farmer City State Bank, Farmer City.            -Approved, July 30, 2012            Banks, Nonmember, and Miscellaneous InstitutionsDirector, BS&R          Warburg Pincus LLC, New York, New York, et al. -- modification of commitments.            -Granted, August 3, 2012            Change in Bank ControlKansas City          First Bancshares, Inc., Kansas City, Kansas -- change in bank control of First Bancshares, Inc., and its subsidiary bank, The First State Bank of Kansas City, Kansas City.            -Permitted, August 2, 2012            Chicago          First State Bank Holding Company, Lynnville, Iowa -- to retain control of First State Bank Holding Company and its subsidiary bank, First State Bank, Lynnville.            -Permitted, August 3, 2012            Minneapolis          Mackinac Financial Corporation, Manistique, Michigan -- change in bank control of Mackinac Financial Corporation and its subsidiary bank, mBank, Manistique.            -Permitted, August 2, 2012            Cleveland          TriState Capital Holdings, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania -- change in bank control of TriState Capital Holdings and its subsidiary bank, TriState Capital Bank, Pittsburgh.            -Permitted, August 1, 2012            Extensions of TimeAtlanta          Platinum Bank Holding Company, Brandon, Florida -- extension to August 2, 2012, to become a bank holding company by acquiring Platinum Bank, Brandon.            -Granted, July 30, 2012            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
```

[House Report 112-734]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

112th Congress  }                                          {    Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session     }                                          {   112-734

======================================================================

 
   WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(A) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO 
  CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON 
                                 RULES

                                _______
                                

 December 30, 2012.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

              Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, 
                        submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 843]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 843, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a 
two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is 
reported from the Rules Committee) against any resolution 
reported on December 31, 2012.

                                  

```