alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James
Hussey, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc., general
partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., General Partner of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/James HusseyJames
      HusseyChief
      Financial Officer of RichmanTax
      Credit Properties Inc., generalpartner
      of Richman Tax Credit PropertiesL.P.,
      General Partner of the RegistrantJune
      24, 2010
-----Original Message----- 

From: michael@BOTHand.com [mailto:michael@BOTHand.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:37 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Michael Bedford 

167 Pennsylvania Avenue 

Phoenixville, PA 19460
From: jazan2@aol.com [mailto:jazan2@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:15 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

-------------------------------- 

SINGLE PAYER/SINGLE PAYER/SINGLE PAYER/SINGLE PAYER/SINGLE PAYER/SINGLE 

PAYER/ SINGLE PAYER/ SINGLE PAYER! 

The need & cost for mental health in this country has been a crisis for 

decades. What, you hope if you ignore it, it will go away? ? ? ? 

Get real! Another urgent reason why we should have just "bitten the 

bullet" & gone directly into a single payer system. No more 

marketing/advertising. No more executive bonuses or exhorbitant 

compensation. NO MORE LOBBYING. All medical procedures get billed to 

one central agency. WE WOULD SAVE $BILLIONS PER MONTH!! Doctors spend 

30% of their resources attempting to get claims paid. But no, we have 

to let health insurance companies run the healthcare system. Why? 

Because they have lobbyists--and I heard how much they spent lobbying 

Congress during the healthcare "reform" debate. I know people who have 

died because their mental disorder was NOT addressed properly. And the 

insurance companies are happy with the status quo. The drug companies 

too. Just throw an elegantly expensive drug at the problem, and then 

forget the patient. As long as you get your money, you can justify the 

rest of it. 

Corruption/corruption/corruption/corruption/corruption/corruption/corru

ption! 

----------------------------------- 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jane Cone 

909 8th Ave. SW 

Ruskin, FL 33570
From: patwillson@covad.net [mailto:patwillson@covad.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:02 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Pat Willson 

Ventura Cyn. 

Sherman Oaks, CA 91401
-----Original Message----- 

From: james.l@insightbb.com [mailto:james.l@insightbb.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:16 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Linda James 

3615 Brendenwood Rd 

Louisville, KY 40272
#### John A. Campbell, Respondent, v. Edmund Kelly, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Corlett. J.
EXHIBIT 10.104

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

           This AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of June 14, 1999 (the "Agreement"), by and among Energy East Corporation, a New York corporation ("EnergyEast"), Central Maine Power Company, a Maine corporation or its successor (the "Company"), and Sara J. Burns (the "Executive"), amends and restates that certain Agreement dated June 30, 1997 and amended March 18, 1999, by andbetween the Company and the Executive (the "Prior Agreement").
<PAGE>   1

                                 EXHIBIT SECTION
                                   EXHIBIT 23

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Champion
Industries, Inc. of our report dated December 22, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Champion Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
for the year ended October 31, 2000.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan (Form S-8, No. 33-76790) of Champion
Industries, Inc. of our report dated December 22, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Champion Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 31, 2000.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Charleston, West Virginia
January 26, 2001

                                  Exhibit 23-p1
From: grn2cole@yahoo.com [mailto:grn2cole@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:06 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Gaia Cole 

"20 Prospect AVE, 1" 

Quincy, MA 02170
###### Editorial Note on Part 195

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.571 What criteria must I use to determine the adequacy of cathodic protection?

Cathodic protection required by this subpart must comply with one or more of the applicable criteria and other considerations for cathodic protection contained paragraphs 6.2.2, 6.2.3, 6.2.4, 6.2.5 and 6.3 in NACE SP 0169 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3).

[Amdt. 195-100, 80 FR 12781, Mar. 11, 2015]
§ 178.33d-2 Variation 1. Notwithstanding the variation provided in this paragraph, each container must otherwise conform to a DOT 2Q container in accordance with § 178.33a. The following conditions also apply under Variation 1— ( a ) *Type and size.* The maximum capacity of containers in this class may not exceed 0.40 L (24.4 cubic inches). The maximum inside diameter shall not exceed 2.1 inches.
( b ) *Manufacture.* Ends: The top of the container must be designed with a pressure relief system consisting of radial scores on the top seam(s). The bottom of the container must be designed to buckle at a pressure greater than the pressure at which the top buckles and vents.
( c ) *Wall thickness.* The minimum wall thickness for any container shall be 0.0085 inches.
( d ) *Tests.* ( 1 ) Two containers (one without a pressure relief system and one with) out of each lot of 25,000 or less, successively produced per day shall be pressure tested to destruction at gauge pressure. The container without a pressure relief system must not burst below 320 psig. The container assembled with a pressure relief system as described in paragraph (b) of this section must be tested to destruction. The bottom of the container must buckle at a pressure greater than the pressure at which the top buckles and vents.
( 2 ) Each such 25,000 containers or less, successively produced per day, shall constitute a lot and if the test container(s) shall fail, the lot shall be rejected. Otherwise, ten (10) additional pairs of containers may be selected at random and subjected to the test under which failure occurred. Should any of the containers thus tested fail, the entire lot must be rejected. All containers constituting a lot shall be of like material, size, design construction, finish, and quality.
( e ) *Marking.* By means of printing, lithographing, embossing, or stamping, each container must be marked: ( 1 ) DOT-2Q1.
( 2 ) With the name or symbol of the person making the mark. A symbol, if used, must be registered with the Associate Administrator.
[81 FR 3685, Jan. 21, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                             148
<SECURITIES>                                     1,951
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,606
<PP&E>                                          21,602
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,050
<BONDS>                                          1,525
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,198
<SALES>                                          9,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,194
<CGS>                                            4,083
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,111
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,111
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,111
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47
        

</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: jrsuttsf@aol.com [mailto:jrsuttsf@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:28 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Joseph Sutton 

2349 Funston Ave. 

San Francisco, CA 94116
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Sierra County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet on August 9, 2007, in Sierraville, California. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss issues relating to implementing the                         *Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000*                         (Payments to States) as extended by Public Law 110-28 and the expenditure of Title II funds benefiting National Forest System lands on the Humboldt-Toiyabe, Plumas and Tahoe National Forests in Sierra County.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, August 9, 2007 at 10 a.m. (If there is a need to cancel this meeting, a back-up is scheduled for Monday, August 13, 2007 at the same time/location.)

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Downieville Community Hall, Downieville, CA.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ann Westling, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Tahoe National Forest, 631 Coyote St., Nevada City, CA 95959, (530) 478-6205, e-mail:                         *awestling@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Welcome and announcements; (2) status of previously approved projects; and (3) review of and decisions on new projects proposals for current year. The meeting is open to the public and the public will have an opportunity to comment at the meeting.

      ( print page 40833)    
Dated: July 18, 2007.

Steven T. Eubanks,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 07-3619 Filed 7-24-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
* Pursuant to 5th C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40150 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
GELACIO ARROYO-BENITEZ also known as Julio Aguirre-Barrera, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-97-CR-338-1

February 10, 1999 Before JOHNSON, DUHE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Gelacio Arroyo-Benitez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for being present illegally in the United States subsequent to deportation. He argues that because the record contains no affirmative showing that
he knowingly and voluntarily waived his constitutional rights, the district court failed to comply with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. He further contends that appellate review of the voluntariness of his plea is impossible as the transcript of rearraingment does not reflect his own answers to the court’s questions2

regarding the waiver of his rights. Arroyo-Benitez asserts that the district court’s method of taking his plea violates Rule 11, and as such, his conviction should be reversed. Arroyo-Benitez does not argue that he did not understand that he was waiving certain constitutional rights by pleading guilty. Because he does not contend that his plea was involuntary, he has not identified any harm or reversible error. See F ED . R. C RIM . P. 11(h), 52.

AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of James Odell.

— Parts of decree appealed from affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
#           Policies and Notices      

These information describes the principal policies and other important notices that govern information posted on USGS websites. 

                            - Laws and Regulations Governing USGS Activities
                            - Information Policies and Instructions                                - USGS Visual Identity 
                            - USGS Information Quality Guidelines
                            - USGS Peer Review Agenda
                            - Linking to non-Federal sites
                            - Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (COPPA) Policy
                            - Environmental Management Policy Statement
                            - Comment Policy
                            - USGS Employee Use of Social Media
                            - Copyright Permission Agreement for Social Media Submissions
                            - DOI Schedule of Content
                            - USGS Strategic Plan
                            - No Fear Act                                - Equal opportunity data required by the No Fear Act Policy 
                            - FOIA
                            - Privacy Policies
                            - Accessibility
From: scottatyner@yahoo.com [mailto:scottatyner@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:03 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Scott Tyner 

319 S. 21st Ave 

Hattiesburg, MS 39401
-----Original Message----- 

From: marczman@earthlink.net [mailto:marczman@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:52 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Marc Zimmerman 

58 Lincoln Street 

Hudson, MA 01749
#### Emma Sprout, Respondent, v. Franklin Newman, Jr., Appellant. Emma Nearpass and another, Respondents, v. The Same Appellant.

Judgment against Newman reversed and new trial granted; costs to abide event. Judgment in favor of Bishop affirmed, without costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.
-----Original Message----- 

From: jallan32@att.net [mailto:jallan32@att.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:49 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

As a comment on the current status, some might say facetiously that 

certain members of the political or religious leadership want to deny 

mental health treatment in order to avoid losing votes or church 

members when patients have their anxieties relieved. 

But more seriously, the discrepancy probably results from the feeling 

that mental problems are easier to "fake" to collect disability 

payments than physical illnesses. It seems hard to believe that a 

significant number of people would take on the social, employment, and 

possible legal stigma for themselves for such a trivial gain. 

Just ask the family of Senator Thomas Eagleton, for one. 

Sincerely, 

Allan Richardson 

3054 Belden St 

Jacksonville, FL 32207
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 3b(i)
 
CONSENT OF SOLE STOCKHOLDER
OF BELL ATLANTIC - WASHINGTON, D.C., INC.

The undersigned, which holds all of the outstanding stock of Bell Atlantic -
Washington, D.C., Inc. (the "Corporation"), does hereby consent to and adopt the
following resolution pursuant to Section 615 of the New York Business 
Corporation Law:

RESOLVED, that the By-Laws of the Corporation be, and they hereby are, amended 
and restated in their entirety as set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto and 
made a part hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned sole stockholder of Bell Atlantic - 
Washington, D.C., Inc. has executed this consent as of the 15th day of December,
1995.

Bell Atlantic Corporation

By:
Raymond W. Smith
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
-----Original Message----- 

From: MAQcrook@msn.com [mailto:MAQcrook@msn.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:14 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

How do you separate the mental part of human being off from the rest of 

them? 

Sincerely, 

Dennis Crook 

2840 strasburg road 

East Fallowfield, PA 19320