alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2038

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prevent an institution

from participating in the Pell Grant program if the institution is ineligible for participation in the Federal Stafford Loan program because

of high default rates.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 13, 1995

Mrs. ROUKEMA (for herself and Mr. GORDON) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prevent

an institution from participating in the Pell Grant program if the institution is ineligible for participation in

the Federal Stafford Loan program because of high default rates.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEFAULT RATE INELIGIBILITY FOR PELL

4 GRANT PROGRAM.

5 Section 481(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965

6 (20 U.S.C. 1088a) is amended by adding at the end the

7 following new paragraph:
2

•HR 2038 IH

1 ‘‘(7) An institution may not qualify as an institution

2 of higher education for purposes of the Pell Grant pro3 gram under subpart 1 of part A of this title if such institu4 tion is ineligible to participate in a loan program under

5 part B of this title as a result of a default rate determina6 tion under section 435(a).’’.

7 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

8 The amendment made by this Act shall apply with

9 respect to periods of enrollment beginning on or after the

10 date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
-----Original Message----- 

From: mglenfuller@gmail.com [mailto:mglenfuller@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 3:48 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Michael Fuller 

44770airport rd. 

Little River, CA 95456
NO. 07-05-0184-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL D JUNE 16, 2005

______________________________ MARION D. CRUSE, APPELLANT

V. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP ORTATION, APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 106 TH DISTRICT COURT OF GARZA COUNTY; NO. 04-09 -05957-CV; HONORA BLE CAR TER SCH ILDKNEC HT, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ. MEMORAND UM OPINION Appellant

Marion D. Crus e appe als from an order granting a Motion for Partial Summary

Judgment filed by

appellee Texas Department of Transportation. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.2

Appellant

fi le d his No tice of A ppeal on May 6, 20 05 with t he trial court cle rk i ndica ting he was appealing from an April 12, 2005 order. On May 16, 2005, the clerk’s record was rece ived and fi le d in this court. On June 3, 2005, the appell ate clerk sent counsel a letter indicating that no final judgment appeared in the clerk’s record. Respo nses to this let

ter c ould be received in the clerk’s office by June 13 , 2005. On June 9, 2005, appellee filed a Motion fo r Involun tary Dism issal co ntending th at the April 12 order is not a final j udgment. No respo nse has b een recei ved from a ppellan t. In a civil case in which the judgment or amount in controversy excee ds one hundred dollars, exclusive of interest and costs, an appeal from a final judgment may be taken t o the court of appeals. T EX . C IV . P RAC . & R EM . C ODE § 51.012 (Vernon 1997). Generally, an appeal may be ta ken only from a fin al judgme nt. See Lehm ann v. Ha r-Con Cor p ., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Appeal can b e taken from inter locutory orders in certain instances authoriz ed by sta tute. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps , 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992); Cherokee Water Co. v. Ross , 698 S.W.2d 363, 365 (T ex. 1985 ); see, e.g. , T EX . C IV . P RAC . & R EM . C ODE § 51.014(Vernon 1997). A judgment is final for purposes of appeal if it di sposes of all pending parties and claims in the record, except as necessary to carry out the decre e. See Lehmann , 39 S.W.3d at 191; North East Independent School Dist. v. Aldridge , 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 19 66).3

We agr ee the or

der from w hich app ellant h as given notice of appeal is not afina l judgmentand is n ot appealab le. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P. 4 2.3(a).

James T. Campbell Justice
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-1320

Directorate Identifier: 2012NM095AD

767-32A0227 --- 4/25/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
-----Original Message----- 

From: parksch@earthlink.net [mailto:parksch@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:59 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Henry Parks 

10423 Tullymore Dr. 

Adelphi, MD 20783
-----Original Message----- 

From: julia.charvat@gmail.com [mailto:julia.charvat@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:40 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Julia Charvat 

186 National Road 

Triadelphia, WV 26059
OFFICE OF THE A-ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Maroh 20. 1939 

XC. Dan V. Jao'k6on 

Dl6trict httoney 

I.arr3.6 cfxusy 

-tOIi, %3X66 

: 
Mr.Dan W. Jaokaon, Xaroh 20, 1999, pge 442 

.,’ 

~oOOrdiX@y~ it 16 Our OphdOn that ff 

6nch provislona in a olty obarter here been followed, t&n 

such co&l.lanoe meet6 all the Is& requirement6 of'law in 

that respect. 

. 

., , .-.’ _ 

.. <.v$ky; truly. Your? . : 

w.w OF v,’
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2199

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the application

of the passive loss limitations to equine activities.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 4, 1995

Mr. BUNNING of Kentucky (for himself, Mr. BAESLER, Mr. WARD, Mr. ROGERS, and Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify

the application of the passive loss limitations to equine

activities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equine Tax Fairness

5 Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF PASSIVE LOSS LIMITATIONS TO

7 EQUINE ACTIVITIES.

8 (a) DETERMINATION OF MATERIAL PARTICIPA9 TION.—Subsection (h) of section 469 of the Internal Reve-
2

•HR 2199 IH

1 nue Code of 1986 (defining material participation) is

2 amended by adding at the end the following new para3 graph:

4 ‘‘(6) TREATMENT OF EQUINE ACTIVITIES.—

5 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—A taxpayer shall be

6 treated as materially participating in an equine

7 activity for a taxable year if—

8 ‘‘(i) the taxpayer’s participation in

9 such activity for such year constitutes sub10 stantially all of the participation in the ac11 tivity of all individuals for such year, other

12 than individuals—

13 ‘‘(I) who are not owners of inter14 est in the activity,

15 ‘‘(II) who are retained and com16 pensated directly by the taxpayer, and

17 ‘‘(III) whose activities are subject

18 to the oversight, supervision, and con19 trol of the taxpayer, or

20 ‘‘(ii) based on all of the facts and cir21 cumstances, the taxpayer participates in

22 the activity on a regular, continuous, and

23 substantial basis during such year, except

24 that for purposes of this clause—
3

•HR 2199 IH

1 ‘‘(I) the taxpayer shall not be re2 quired to participate in the activity

3 for any minimum period of time dur4 ing such year, and

5 ‘‘(II) the performance of services

6 by individuals who are not owners of

7 interests in the activity shall not be

8 considered if such services are rou9 tinely provided by individuals special10 izing in such services and such serv11 ices are subject to the oversight, su12 pervision, and control of the taxpayer.

13 ‘‘(B) PARTNERS AND S CORPORATION

14 SHAREHOLDERS.—Subject to paragraph (2),

15 the determination of whether a partner or S

16 corporation shareholder shall be treated as ma17 terially participating in any equine activity of

18 the partnership or S corporation shall be based

19 upon the combined participation of all of the

20 partners or shareholders in the activity.

21 ‘‘(C) EQUINE ACTIVITY.—For purposes of

22 this paragraph, the term ‘equine activity’ means

23 breeding, racing, or showing horses.’’

24 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

25 this section shall take effect as if included in the amend-
4

•HR 2199 IH

1 ments made by section 501 of the Tax Reform Act of

2 1986.

Æ
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 7, 1995 (111), Para 111.33 Motion to Instruct Conferees--H.R. 1817]
[Page 1317]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.111.33  motion to instruct conferees--h.r. 1817

  Mr. OBEY moved that the managers on the part of the House at the 
conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on H.R. 1817, be 
instructed to not provide funding for non-quality of life projects added 
above the President's request, which are in excess of the cumulative 
amounts added for such projects in the House passed bill.
  After debate,
  By unanimous consent, the previous question was ordered on the motion 
to instruct the managers on the part of the House.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House agree to said motion?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaHOOD, announced that the yeas had it.
  So the motion to instruct the managers on the part of the House was 
agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said motion was agreed to was, 
by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Thereupon, the SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaHOOD, by unanimous consent, 
announced the appointment of Mrs. Vucanovich, Messrs. Callahan, McDade, 
Myers, Porter, Istook, Wicker, Livingston, Hefner, Foglietta, Visclosky, 
Torres, and Obey, as managers on the part of the House at said 
conference.
  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate of the foregoing 
appointments.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, July 18, 1995 (96), Para 96.33 Leave of Absence]
[Page 1151]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.96.33  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted to Mr. CRANE, for 
today from 2:30 p.m. until July 19.
  And then,
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that:

(1)The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period endedJuly 31, 2007, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:September 14, 2007
|        | /s/ Joseph C. Christenson                                        |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph C. Christenson                                            |
|   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief   Financial Officer |

 

----
MOTO PHOTO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                              Three Months    Three Months
                                                 Ended            Ended
                                               31-Mar-97        31-Mar-96

<S>                                               <C>              <C>
PRIMARY
Average shares outstanding                        7,787,884       7,785,973
Net effect of dilutive common equivalents --
   based on the tresaury stock method using
   average market price                                 (A)             (A)

TOTAL                                             7,787,884       7,785,973

Net Income  (Loss)                          $     (126,933)  $    (294,523)
Less Preferred Stock dividend requirements         (71,470)  $     (72,830)

Net Loss applicable to Common Stock               (198,403)       (367,353)

Per share amount                            $        (0.03)  $       (0.05)

FULLY DILUTED
Average shares outstanding                        7,787,884       7,785,973
Net effect of dilutive common stock
   equivalents -- based on the treasury
   stock method using the quarter-end market
   price, if higher than average market                 (B)             (B)
price
Assumed conversion of Series G
   convertible preferred shares                   7,111,111       8,465,608

TOTAL                                            14,898,995      16,251,581

Net Income(Loss)                                  (126,933)       (294,523)
Pref Series G Previously Accreted
Dividends                                         1,077,498       1,288,207

Fully Diluted Net Income(Loss)                      950,565         993,684

Per share amount                            $          0.06  $         0.06

</TABLE>


(A)   The effects of conversion of common stock equivalents to common stock
      are antidilutive to the earnings per share calculations.

(B)   Less than 3%
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                         566,826
<SECURITIES>                                    76,506
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,736
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    154,957
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               865,591
<PP&E>                                          29,795
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,072,185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          300,327
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,035
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,810,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,072,186
<SALES>                                        133,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           33,548
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  107,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,110
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,110
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00



</TABLE>
43210 5 9876 10 MILES

43210 5 9876 10 KILOMETERS

122°40'

47°

20'

47°

10'

47°

46°

50'

122°30' 122°20' 122°10'

T.

21

N.

T.

20

N.

T.

19

N.

T.

18

N.

T.

17

N.

T.

16

N.

T.

15

N.

R. 01 E. R. 02 E. R. 03 E. R. 04 E. R. 05 E.

LIDAR hillshade inside study area:

 Please credit the Puget Sound LiDAR Consortium (PSLC) for these data. 

 The PSLC is supported by the Puget Sound Regional Council,

 the National Aeronautical and Space Administration (NASA),

 the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous

 partners in local, state, and tribal government.

DEM hilllshade outside study area:

 USGS National Elevation Data (NED), 2000. 10 meter resolution,

 UTM Zone 10, North American Datum 1983

Base from U.S. Geological Survey digital data, 1983, 1:100,000

 Universal Transverse Mercator projection, Zone 10

 Horizontal Datum: North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83)
§ 212.231 Highway-rail grade crossing inspector. ( a ) The highway-rail grade crossing inspector is required, at a minimum, to be able to conduct independent inspections of all types of highway-rail grade crossing warning systems for the purpose of determining compliance with Grade Crossing Signal System Safety Rules (49 CFR part 234), to make reports of those inspections, and to recommend institution of enforcement actions when appropriate to promote compliance.
( b ) The highway-rail grade crossing inspector is required, at a minimum, to have at least four years of recent experience in highway-rail grade crossing construction or maintenance. A bachelor's degree in engineering or a related technical specialization may be substituted for two of the four years of this experience requirement. Successful completion of an apprentice training program under § 212.233 may be substituted for the four years of this experience requirement.
( c ) The highway-rail grade crossing inspector shall demonstrate the following specific qualifications: ( 1 ) A comprehensive knowledge of highway-rail grade crossing nomenclature, inspection techniques, maintenance requirements, and methods;
( 2 ) The ability to understand and detect deviations from: ( i ) Grade crossing signal system maintenance, inspection and testing standards accepted in the industry; and
( ii ) The Grade Crossing Signal System Safety Rules (49 CFR part 234);
( 3 ) Knowledge of operating practices and highway-rail grade crossing systems sufficient to understand the safety significance of deviations and combinations of deviations from § 212.231(c)(2) (i) and (ii);
( 4 ) Specialized knowledge of the requirements of the Grade Crossing Signal System Safety Rules (49 CFR part 234), including the remedial action required to bring highway-rail grade crossing signal systems into compliance with those Rules;
( 5 ) Specialized knowledge of highway-rail grade crossing standards contained in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices; and
( 6 ) Knowledge of railroad signal systems sufficient to ensure that highway-rail grade crossing warning systems and inspections of those systems do not adversely affect the safety of railroad signal systems.
( d ) A State signal and train control inspector qualified under this part and who has demonstrated the ability to understand and detect deviations from the Grade Crossing Signal System Safety Rules (49 CFR part 234) is deemed to meet all requirements of this section and is qualified to conduct independent inspections of all types of highway-rail grade crossing warning systems for the purpose of determining compliance with Grade Crossing Signal System Safety Rules (49 CFR part 234), to make reports of those inspections, and to recommend institution of enforcement actions when appropriate to promote compliance.
[59 FR 50104, Sept. 30, 1994]
-----Original Message----- 

From: brianfikes@hotmail.com [mailto:brianfikes@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:42 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Brian Fikes 

310 Esplanade Ave Apt 71 

Pacifica, CA 94044
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.169 Compressor stations: Pressure limiting devices. ( a ) Each compressor station must have pressure relief or other suitable protective devices of sufficient capacity and sensitivity to ensure that the maximum allowable operating pressure of the station piping and equipment is not exceeded by more than 10 percent.
( b ) Each vent line that exhausts gas from the pressure relief valves of a compressor station must extend to a location where the gas may be discharged without hazard.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 26, 1995 (102), Para 102.9 Order of Business--Consideration of H.R. 2076]
[Page 1195]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.102.9  order of business--consideration of h.r. 2076

  On motion of Mr. ROGERS, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That during the further consideration of the bill (H.R. 2076) 
making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and 
State, the Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 1996, and for other purposes, pursuant to the provisions 
of House Resolution 198, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may 
postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of 
the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment, and that the 
Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may reduce to not less than five 
minutes the time for voting by electronic device on any postponed 
question that immediately follows another vote by electronic device 
without intervening business, providing that the time for voting by 
electronic device on the first in any series of questions shall be not 
less than 15 minutes.
```