alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ANTHONY BEVACQUI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued March 17, 1952

Decided March 21, 1952.

*502Before Judges McGeehan, Jayne, and ¥m. J. Brennan, Jr. .

*Mr. Edward F. Juslca*argued the cause for appellant.

*Mr. George A.*Gray, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent *(Mr. J. Victor Garton,*Monmouth County Prosecutor, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

The defendant-appellant was convicted by the jury of making a book upon the running of horses contrary to the provisions of *R. S.*2:135—3. The evidence at the conclusion of the State’s branch of the trial clearly established to a *prima facie*degree the guilt of the defendant requiring the submission of the case to the jury.

“One thing, however, is certain, and that is that when there is any testimony in the case which supports the criminal charge made against the defendant, the jury and not the court must settle the question of his guilt or innocence.” *State v.*Plough, 88 *N. J. L.*425*(Sup. Ct.*1916); *State v. Morehous,*97 *N. J. L.*285*(E. & A.*1922); *State v.*O’Donnell, 8 *N. J. Super.*13*(App. Div.*1950).

The characteristic paraphernalia of bookmaking, such as the daily issues of the Armstrong sheets showing the horses entered in the various races, a small bound note book containing notations under the headings “win” and “lose,” and 51 slips upon which bets were recorded, were present in a closet in the apartment of the defendant. Moreover, on the afternoon of the investigation one of the detectives in the presence of the defendant answered nine telephone calls from persons who asked for Anthony. Two of the nine persons who called placed bets. We conclude that the court justifiably denied the defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal at the close of the State’s evidence. *State v. De*Falco, 8 *N. J. Super.*295*(App. Div.*1950), certif. denied, 5 *N. J.*483 (1950); *State v.*Martinek, 12 *N. J. Super.*320*(App. Div.*1951).

*503In his instructions to the jury the judge incidentally remarked:

> “In a case of this nature it is usually necessary for the State to rely upon circumstantial evidence to prove its ease inasmuch as the tangible and positive evidence is frequently destroyed and effaced before seizure by the authorities.”

This comment was doubtless inspired by the evidence that Hie defendant delayed from five to seven minutes in responding to the announcement of ilie arrival of the detectives, during which period the flushing of the toilet in the apartment was heard, coupled with the circumstance that the slips upon which bets were recorded appeared to be pieces of toilet paper.

It does not appear from our examination of the record submitted to us that the defendant suffered manifest wrong or injury or that his- substantial rights were prejudicially affected by reason of the court’s discursive fluency.

Judgment affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 4, 2020

a0127 

# Order

Clerk February 4, 2020

159118(69)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 159118

COA: 338601

Jackson CC: 16

- 004024

- FC

PERCY EDWARD TAYLOR,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of th is Court’s September

30, 2019 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending July 13, 2013

|Filer                  | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                                
|---------------------- | ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|INDEPENDENT BANK CORP. | * 3A5* 3A3    | Application by Independent Bank Corp, Rockland, Massachusetts, to acquire Mayflower Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary bank, Mayflower Co-operative Bank, both of Middleboro, Massachusetts, pursuant to sections 3(a)(3) and 3(a)(5) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:             | Not available
|Federal Register:      | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, “Gene Therapy for Urea Cycle Disorders.”                    

*Date:*                         July 18, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Norman Chang, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485,                         *changn@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 19, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-3125 Filed 6-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Carol Rice, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PaulsonCapital Corp.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results or operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses, in the designor operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: November 7, 2003 |                        |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                        |                        |
|                        | /s/ Carol Rice              |   |
|                        | Carol Rice                  |   |
|                        | Chief Financial Officer     |   |
|                        | Principal Financial Officer |   |

 

----
§ 215.123 Defective couplers. A railroad may not place or continue in service a car, if— ( a ) The car is equipped with a coupler shank that is bent out of alignment to the extent that the coupler will not couple automatically with the adjacent car;
( b ) The car has a coupler that has a crack in the highly stressed junction area of the shank and head as shown in the figure below (see figure 2).
( c ) The car has a coupler knuckle that is broken or cracked on the inside pulling face of the knuckle.
( d ) The car has a knuckle pin or knuckle thrower that is: ( 1 ) Missing; or
( 2 ) Inoperative; or
( e ) The car has a coupler retainer pin lock that is— ( 1 ) Missing; or
( 2 ) Broken; or
( f ) The car has a coupler with any of the following conditions: ( 1 ) The locklift is inoperative;
( 2 ) The coupler assembly does not have anticreep protection to prevent unintentional unlocking of the coupler lock; or
( 3 ) The coupler lock is— ( i ) Missing;
( ii ) Inoperative;
( iii ) Bent;
( iv ) Cracked; or
( v ) Broken.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00016

- CR

E X PARTE J AY A LLEN R OTTER §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 211th District Cour t

of Denton County ( F20

- 2507

- 431 )

May 20, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s order

. It is ordered that the orde r of the trial court is

affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Mike Wallach

___________________ Justice Mike Wallach
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending August 7, 2010

|Filer                | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                             
|-------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|ANCHOR BANCORP, INC. | * 3A1         | Anchor Bancorp, Inc., Lacey, Washington, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Anchor Mutual Savings Bank, Aberdeen, Washington, upon conversion from a mutual savings bank to a stock savings bank. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:04/15/2010
|Newspaper:           | Not available
|Federal Register:    | 04/15/2010   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, August 2, 1995 (107), Para 107.32 Time Limitation of Referred Bill]
[Page 1247]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.107.32  time limitation of referred bill

  Pursuant to clause 5 of rule X the following action was taken by the 
Speaker:

       H.R. 1670. Referral to the Committees on National Security 
     and the Judiciary extended for a period ending not later than 
     Oct. 2, 1995.
```
EXHIBIT 21

CORPORATE ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
FOREMOST CORPORATION OF AMERICA
DECEMBER 31, 1997

Foremost Corporation of America (Delaware)
  FEIN: 38-1863522, NAIC Grp: 238
  -------------------------------------------
        Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-1470533, NAIC: 11185
          -------------------------------------------------------------
              American Federation Insurance Company (Florida) 100%
                FEIN: 59-2326047, NAIC: 43699
              Foremost Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Indiana) 100%
                FEIN: 35-1604635, NAIC: 11800
              Foremost Signature Insurance Company (Michigan) 100%
                FEIN: 38-2430150, NAIC: 41513
              Federated Insurance Services of California (California) 100%
        Foremost Financial Services Corporation (Delaware) 100%
          FEIN: 73-0462770
        Foremost Home Services Corporation (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-2260224
        Foremost Home Brokers, Inc. (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-2197432
        Foremost Express Insurance Agency, Inc. (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-2505922
        Foremost Affinity Services, Inc. (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 382234183
        Western Star Underwriters, Inc. (Texas) 100%
          FEIN: 74-1593853
        Foremost Real Estate Company (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-2429614
        Foremost Affiliated Insurance Services, Inc. (Michigan) 100%
          FEIN: 38-2336672
          ----------------------------------------------------------
              Pacific Way Insurance Agency, Inc. (Washington) 100%
                FEIN: 38-2987359
              Knight Agency, Inc. (Kentucky) 100%
                FEIN: 61-1281764
              Sunrise Insurance Agency, Inc. (Nevada) 100%
                FEIN: 88-0266963
              Sunrise Insurance Agency of Arizona, Inc. (Arizona) 100%
                FEIN: 31-1360491
              Corvette General Agency, Inc. (Georgia) 100%
                FEIN: 31-1368858
              Frontier Insurance Agency, Inc. (Oregon) 100%
                FEIN: 38-2987361

Foremost Lloyds of Texas (Texas)
  FEIN: 75-1779175, NAIC: 41688
Foremost County Mutual Insurance Company (Texas)
  FEIN: 38-1721730, NAIC: 29254
  ----------------------------------------------
      Sunrise Insurance Agency of Texas, Inc. (Texas) 100%
        FEIN: 38-2987749
Editorial Note on Part 193
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

§ 193.2057 Thermal radiation protection. Each LNG container and LNG transfer system must have a thermal exclusion zone in accordance with section 2.2.3.2 of NFPA-59A-2001 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 193.2013) with the following exceptions: ( a ) The thermal radiation distances must be calculated using Gas Technology Institute's (GTI) report or computer model GTI-04/0032 LNGFIRE3: A Thermal Radiation Model for LNG Fires (incorporated by reference, *see* § 193.2013). The use of other alternate models which take into account the same physical factors and have been validated by experimental test data may be permitted subject to the Administrator's approval.
( b ) In calculating exclusion distances, the wind speed producing the maximum exclusion distances shall be used except for wind speeds that occur less than 5 percent of the time based on recorded data for the area.
( c ) In calculating exclusion distances, the ambient temperature and relative humidity that produce the maximum exclusion distances shall be used except for values that occur less than five percent of the time based on recorded data for the area.
[Amdt. 193-17, 65 FR 10958, Mar. 1, 2000, as amended by Amdt. 193-18, 69 FR 11336, Mar. 10, 2004; Amdt. 193-22, 75 FR 48604, Aug. 11, 2010; Amdt. 193-25, 80 FR 182, Jan. 5, 2015]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending November 23, 2013

|Filer                        | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                          
|---------------------------- | ----------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|CAPGEN CAPITAL GROUP III LLC | * 3A3       | CapGen Capital Group III LLC and CapGen Capital Group III LP, both of New York, New York, to increase their investment up to 25% of the outstanding common stock of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida, Stuart, Florida, and thereby increase their investment in Seacoast National Bank, Stuart, Florida. | Newspaper:12/08/2013Federal Register:12/12/2013
|Newspaper:                   | 12/08/2013 
|Federal Register:            | 12/12/2013 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2014 (January 1, 2014 - March 31, 2014)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
-----Original Message----- 

From: visionsinc@comcast.net [mailto:visionsinc@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:55 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jeff Harris 

480 Harvey 

Des Plaines, IL 60016