alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 180.411 Acceptable results of tests and inspections. ( a ) *Corroded or abraded areas.* The minimum thickness may not be less than that prescribed in the applicable specification.
( b ) *Dents, cuts, digs and gouges.* For evaluation procedures, see CGA C-6 (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter). ( 1 ) For dents at welds or that include a weld, the maximum allowable depth is 1 ⁄ 2 inch. For dents away from welds, the maximum allowable depth is 1 ⁄ 10 of the greatest dimension of the dent, but in no case may the depth exceed one inch.
( 2 ) The minimum thickness remaining beneath a cut, dig, or gouge may not be less than that prescribed in the applicable specification.
( c ) *Weld or structural defects.* Any cargo tank with a weld defect such as a crack, pinhole, or incomplete fusion, or a structural defect must be taken out of hazardous materials service until repaired.
( d ) *Leakage.* All sources of leakage must be properly repaired prior to returning a tank to hazardous materials service.
( e ) *Relief valves.* Any pressure relief valve that fails to open and reclose at the prescribed pressure must be repaired or replaced.
( f ) *Liner integrity.* Any defect shown by the test must be properly repaired.
( g ) *Pressure test.* Any tank that fails to meet the acceptance criteria found in the individual specification that applies must be properly repaired.
[Amdt. 180-2, 54 FR 25032, June 12, 1989, as amended at 68 FR 75764, Dec. 31, 2003]
ACADIA POWER PARTNERS,
      LLC
                EXHIBIT
  23(c)
 Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-10169, 33-26726, 33-38362, 33-44663, 333-44364, 333-59692,
333-59696, 333-124716 and 333-127496) of Cleco Corporation of our report dated
February 26, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Acadia
Power Partners, LLC, which appears in this Form 10-K.
   
 
 /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLPNew
      Orleans, LouisianaFebruary
      26, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)


OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350











In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paulson Capital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chester L. F. Paulson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Chester L. F. PaulsonChester L. F. PaulsonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerPaulson Capital Corp. August 14, 2012





This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Paulson Capital Corp. and will be retained by Paulson Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 199.107 Drug testing laboratory. ( a ) Each operator shall use for the drug testing required by this part only drug testing laboratories certified by the Department of Health and Human Services under the DOT Procedures.
( b ) The drug testing laboratory must permit— ( 1 ) Inspections by the operator before the laboratory is awarded a testing contract; and
( 2 ) Unannounced inspections, including examination of records, at any time, by the operator, the Administrator, and if the operator is subject to state agency jurisdiction, a representative of that state agency.
[53 FR 47096, Nov. 21, 1988. Redesignated by Amdt. 199-19, 66 FR 47118, Sept. 11, 2001]
#### § 198.63 How may a State with an inadequate damage prevention enforcement program seek reconsideration by PHMSA?

At any time following a finding of inadequacy, the State may petition PHMSA to reconsider such finding based on changed circumstances including improvements in the State's enforcement program. Upon receiving a petition, PHMSA will reconsider its finding of inadequacy promptly and will notify the State of its decision on reconsideration promptly but no later than the time of the next annual certification review.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PHI Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the  period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Henry D. Fahman, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

/s/ Henry Fahman

Henry Fahman

Acting CFO

February 12, 2010

 

 

----
-----Original Message----- 

From: Kev946@yahoo.com [mailto:Kev946@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 8:28 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kevin Shorten 

9104 Ballard Lane 

Clinton, MD 20735
From: jen_kakon@yahoo.com [mailto:jen_kakon@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 6:05 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

jennifer kakon 

65 crestline dr. 

san francisco, CA 94131
-----Original Message----- 

From: sokitx@aol.com [mailto:sokitx@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:36 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

harold sokolove 

3707 windmill hill 

waco, TX 76710
1

Clarified Equations Presented in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) for 

the Test Procedure for Commercial Refrigeration Equipment (RIN 1904-AC40)

published in the Federal Register on November 24, 2010, 75 FR 71596.

Eq. 1 found on 75 FR 71603 and in the rule language on 75 FR 71612:

 

 

 

Eq. 2 found on page 75 FR 71604:

 

 

Eq. 3 found on page 75 FR 71604:

 

Eq. 4 found on page 75 FR 71604 and in the rule language on 75 FR 71612:

 

 

 

Eq. 5 found on page 75 FR 71605:

 

Eq. 6 found on page 75 FR 71605:

 

Eq. 7 found on page 75 FR 71605 and in the rule language on 75 FR 71612:
§ 174.204 Tank car delivery of gases, including cryogenic liquids. ( a ) A tank car containing Class 2 (gases) material may not be unloaded unless it is consigned for delivery and unloaded on a private track (see § 171.8 of this subchapter). However, if a private track is not available, it may be delivered and unloaded on carrier tracks subject to the following conditions: ( 1 ) A tank car of DOT-106A or 110A type (§ 179.300 or § 179.301 of this subchapter) may not be delivered and the loaded unit tanks may not be removed from the car frame on carrier tracks. However, a carrier may give permission for the unloading of these containers on carrier tracks only if a private siding is not available within a reasonable trucking distance of the final destination. In addition, before the car is accepted for transportation, the shipper must obtain from the delivering carrier and file with the originating carrier, written permission for the removal and the consignee must furnish an adequately strong mechanical hoist by which the tanks can be lifted from the car and deposited directly upon vehicles furnished by the consignee for immediate removal from carrier property.
( 2 ) The following tank cars may not be delivered and unloaded on carrier tracks unless the lading is piped directly from the car to permanent storage tanks of sufficient capacity to receive the entire contents of the car; however, such cars may be stored on a private track (see § 171.8 of this subchapter) or on carrier tracks designated by the carrier for such storage: ( i ) A tank car containing Division 2.1 (flammable gas) material that is a cryogenic liquid; or
( ii ) A tank car, except for a DOT-106A or 110A multi-unit tank car tank (§ 179.300 or § 179.301 of this subchapter), containing anhydrous ammonia; hydrogen chloride, refrigerated liquid; hydrocarbon gas, liquefied; or liquefied petroleum gas; and having interior pipes for liquid and gas discharge valves equipped with check valves.
( b ) [Reserved]
[Amdt. 174-26, 41 FR 16092, Apr. 15, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 174-26A, 41 FR 40685, Sept. 20, 1976; Amdt. 174-32, 43 FR 48644, Oct. 19, 1978; Amdt. 174-43, 48 FR 27699, June 16, 1983; 48 FR 50440, 50441, Nov. 1, 1983; Amdt. 174-68, 55 FR 52682, Dec. 21, 1990]
-----Original Message----- 

From: bnlhor@yahoo.com [mailto:bnlhor@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:53 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jennifer Floyd 

4845 Redondo Dr 

La Mesa, CA 91941
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-1027 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Communications 

 Memorandum of Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the REPUBLIC OF KOREA 

Signed October 27, 2008 

 

 with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
REPUBLIC OF KOREA 

Defense: Communications 

 Memorandum of agreement signed 

 October 27, 2008; 

 Entered into force October 27, 2008. 

 With annexes.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<SUBSIDIARY>
   <NUMBER> 006
   <NAME> WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1995           DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1995           DEC-31-1994
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          680,572               663,855
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>            872                   982
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              66,496                62,015
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            26,092                26,914
<OTHER-ASSETS>                      41,582                18,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     815,614               771,977
<COMMON>                           137,214               137,214
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>            2,236                 2,236
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                125,770               132,504
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>     265,220               271,594
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0                     0
<PREFERRED>                          6,291                 6,291
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>               273,245               210,047
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                  19,820                46,315
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0                     0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0                     0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>            0                   650
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0                     0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>              0                     0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                         0                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     251,038               236,720
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      815,614               771,977
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>          319,835               342,991
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                 5,542                17,954
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         254,807               270,274
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         260,349               288,228
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>             59,486                54,763
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                     (85)                4,360
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>      59,401                59,123
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>            24,871                21,757
<NET-INCOME>                        34,530                37,366
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            264                   452
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>       34,266                36,914
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            41,000                31,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>           21,413                18,547
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>              53,340                28,004
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .18                   .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .18                   .19
        

</TABLE>
§ 218.75 Methods of protection for camp cars. When camp cars requiring protection are on either main track or track other than main track: ( a ) A warning signal shall be displayed at or near each switch providing access to that track;
( b ) The person in charge of the camp car occupants shall immediately notify the person responsible for directing train movements on that portion of the railroad where the camp cars are being parked;
( c ) Once notified of the presence of camp cars and their location on main track or other than main track, the person responsible for directing train movements on that portion of the railroad where the camp cars are being parked shall take appropriate action to alert affected personnel to the presence of the cars;
( d ) Each manually operating switch providing access to track on which the camp cars are located shall be lined against movement to that track and secured with an effective locking device and spiked; and
( e ) Each remotely controlled switch providing access to the track on which the camp cars are located shall be protected in accordance with § 218.77.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership II for
the three months ended March 31, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                          MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                          0
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             106,070
<ALLOWANCES>                                              101,729
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          785,220
<PP&E>                                                 10,298,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                          5,720,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          5,445,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     880,359
<BONDS>                                                 6,675,762
<COMMON>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            5,445,989
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          484,546
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             650,542
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        147,414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (165,996)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (165,996)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              (16.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 190
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 190 appear at 78 FR 58908, Sept. 25, 2013.

§ 190.327 Hearings. ( a ) If a notice of proposed rulemaking does not provide for a hearing, any interested person may petition the Administrator for an informal hearing. The petition must be received by the Administrator not later than 20 days before expiration of the time stated in the notice. The filing of the petition does not automatically result in the scheduling of a hearing. A petition is granted only if the petitioner shows good cause for a hearing. If a petition for a hearing is granted, notice of the hearing is published in the Federal Register.
( b ) Sections 556 and 557 of title 5, United States Code, do not apply to hearings held under this subpart. Unless otherwise specified, hearings held under this subpart are informal, non-adversarial fact-finding proceedings, at which there are no formal pleadings or adverse parties. Any regulation issued in a case in which an informal hearing is held is not necessarily based exclusively on the record of the hearing.
( c ) The Administrator designates a representative to conduct any hearing held under this subpart. The Chief Counsel designates a member of his or her staff to serve as legal officer at the hearing.
[Amdt. 190-8, 61 FR 50909, Sept. 27, 1996. Redesignated and amended by Amdt. 190-16, 78 FR 58914, Sept. 25, 2013]
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 12-40058 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. HECTOR SERNA, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:07-CR-1346-1

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SOUTHWICK and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Hector Serna appeals the nine-month s e n t ence imposed by the district court following the revocation of his term of supervised release for possession of
a firearm by a convicted felon; his sentence falls within the applicable guidelines range and below the statutory maximum. Although this court or din arily reviews revocation sentences under the “plainly unreasonable” standard, United States
v . Miller , 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 132 S. Ct. 496 (2 0 1 1 ) , w e review for plain error because Serna failed to object to his sentence in the U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 15, 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 12-40058 Document: 00511957481 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/15/2012No. 12-40058

di s t rict court. See United States v. Whitelaw , 580 F.3d 256, 259-60 ( 5 th C i r . 2009); United States v. Peltier , 505 F.3d 389, 391-92 (5th Cir. 2 008). Although he argues that his sentence should be vacated because, inter alia, his violations were due to extenuating circumstances, Serna’s sentence was fully consistent with the primary goal of a s e n t ence on revocation, which is to sanction the violator for failing to abide by the terms of supervised release. See U.S.S.G. Ch. 7, Pt. A, intro. comment. ¶ 3(b); see Miller , 634 F.3d at 843 (“[T]he goal o f revocation is to punish a defendant for violating the terms of the supervised release.”). He fails to show that his sentence is plainly erron e o u s. Whitelaw , 580 F.3d at 265. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-40058 Document: 00511957481 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/15/2012