alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SOUTHSIDE
BANCSHARE'S CORP'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH DOCUMENT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          18,273
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             657
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,209
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    157,740
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          41,835
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            41,815
<LOANS>                                        456,044
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,121
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 725,054
<DEPOSITS>                                     558,371
<SHORT-TERM>                                    92,806
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,329
<LONG-TERM>                                        988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,985
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 725,054
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,468
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,176
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    88
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                12,732
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,358
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,955
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,777
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       98
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,562
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,252
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,252
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,635
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.80
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,771
<LOANS-PAST>                                       637
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,830
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,390
<RECOVERIES>                                       405
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,121
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,121
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
§ 1549.105 Recordkeeping. ( a ) Each certified cargo screening facility must maintain records demonstrating compliance with all statutes, regulations, directives, orders, and security programs that apply to operation as a certified cargo screening facility, including the records listed below, at the facility location or other location as approved by TSA: ( 1 ) Records of all training and instructions given to each individual under § 1549.103. The CCSF must retain these records for 180 days after the individual is no longer employed by the certified cargo screening facility or is no longer acting as the facility's agent.
( 2 ) Copies of all documents related to applications for, or renewals of, TSA certification to operate under part 1549.
( 3 ) Documents establishing TSA's certification and renewal of certification as required by part 1549.
( 4 ) Records demonstrating that each individual has complied with the security threat assessment provisions of § 1549.111.
( b ) Unless otherwise stated, records must be retained until the next re-certification.
[74 FR 47706, Sept. 16, 2009, as amended at 76 FR 51868, Aug. 18, 2011]
#### Nelson B. Killmer, *Appellant, v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed.
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.5 Class locations. ( a ) This section classifies pipeline locations for purposes of this part. The following criteria apply to classifications under this section. ( 1 ) A “class location unit” is an onshore area that extends 220 yards (200 meters) on either side of the centerline of any continuous 1- mile (1.6 kilometers) length of pipeline.
( 2 ) Each separate dwelling unit in a multiple dwelling unit building is counted as a separate building intended for human occupancy.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, pipeline locations are classified as follows: ( 1 ) A Class 1 location is: ( i ) An offshore area; or
( ii ) Any class location unit that has 10 or fewer buildings intended for human occupancy.
( 2 ) A Class 2 location is any class location unit that has more than 10 but fewer than 46 buildings intended for human occupancy.
( 3 ) A Class 3 location is: ( i ) Any class location unit that has 46 or more buildings intended for human occupancy; or
( ii ) An area where the pipeline lies within 100 yards (91 meters) of either a building or a small, well-defined outside area (such as a playground, recreation area, outdoor theater, or other place of public assembly) that is occupied by 20 or more persons on at least 5 days a week for 10 weeks in any 12-month period. (The days and weeks need not be consecutive.)
( 4 ) A Class 4 location is any class location unit where buildings with four or more stories above ground are prevalent.
( c ) The length of Class locations 2, 3, and 4 may be adjusted as follows: ( 1 ) A Class 4 location ends 220 yards (200 meters) from the nearest building with four or more stories above ground.
( 2 ) When a cluster of buildings intended for human occupancy requires a Class 2 or 3 location, the class location ends 220 yards (200 meters) from the nearest building in the cluster.
( d ) An operator must have records that document the current class location of each gas transmission pipeline segment and that demonstrate how the operator determined each current class location in accordance with this section.
[Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28783, June 6, 1996; 61 FR 35139, July 5, 1996, as amended by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37502, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-125, 84 FR 52243, Oct. 1, 2019; Amdt. 192-127, 85 FR 40134, July 6, 2020]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2040

To provide for the treatment of Indian tribal governments under section

403(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 13, 1995

Mr. SHAW (for himself, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. KLECZKA, and Mr. HASTINGS

of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide for the treatment of Indian tribal governments

under section 403(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERN4 MENTS UNDER SECTION 403(b).

5 In the case of any contract purchased in a plan year

6 beginning before January 1, 1995, section 403(b) of the

7 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied as if any

8 reference to an employer described in section 501(c)(3) of

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 which is exempt from

10 tax under section 501 of such Code included a reference
2

HR 2040 IH

1 to an employer which is an Indian tribal government (as

2 defined by section 7701(a)(40) of such Code), a subdivi3 sion of an Indian tribal government (determined in accord4 ance with section 7871(d) of such Code), an agency or

5 instrumentality of an Indian tribal government or subdivi6 sion thereof, or a corporation chartered under Federal,

7 State, or tribal law which is owned in whole or in part

8 by any of the foregoing.

Æ
EXHIBIT 23a

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-33098 and 333-55656) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-10169, 33-26726, 33-38362, 33-44663, 333-44364, 333-59692 and 333-59696) of Cleco Corporation of our report dated January 29, 2002, except Note 20, as to which the date is February 8, 2002, relating to the financial statements, which is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New Orleans, Louisiana
March 22, 2002
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew I. Sealfon, certify that:

   1. I have reviewed the Form 10-QSB of Repro-Med Systems, Inc. (the "Report");

   2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

   3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

   4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
   ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
   including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
   those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
   prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
   controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
   the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
   the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
   internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
   business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
   fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
   affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
   issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

   5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
   operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
   likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
   process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
   control over financial reporting.

Date: October 15, 2004

/s/ Andrew I. Sealfon
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

          - [Transmittal Nos. 07-38] 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency. 

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 Dated 21 July 1996. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 07-38 with attached transmittal, and policy justification. 

Dated: August 8, 2007. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. 

      ( print page 45766)          ( print page 45767)          ( print page 45768)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M 

[FR Doc. 07-3981 Filed 8-14-07; 8:45 am] 

                BILLING CODE 5001-06-C                       ( print page 45769)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                         136,117
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  240,653
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    626,315
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,099,607
<PP&E>                                       1,039,001
<DEPRECIATION>                               (569,887)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,621,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          527,729
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        100
<COMMON>                                       233,540
<OTHER-SE>                                     461,470
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,621,874
<SALES>                                        556,614
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               556,614
<CGS>                                          292,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  546,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,002
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                200
<DISCONTINUED>                                  10,202
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,202
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00






</TABLE>
*Wednesday, February 10,1999*

MERIT DOCKET

99-265.

#### State v. Lantz.

Perry App. No. 9763. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment entry,

*1494IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed as moot.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SHAWN J. LAUTERBACH

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3165

[ November 1, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County ; Robert L. Pegg

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312013CF001146A

.

Shawn J. Lauterbach, Blountstown, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine

Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, f or appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, M AY and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
From: beautiful.france@hotmail.com 

[mailto:beautiful.france@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:21 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Doyle Sebesta 

50209 Eagle Trace Drive 

Georgetown, TX 78626
Exhibit 99.4


                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Neal T. McLaughlin, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Centennial Bancorp;


2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;


(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


(c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):


(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and


6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.







/s/ Neal T. McLaughlin
------------------------
Neal T. McLaughlin
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer;
Chief Accounting Officer
November 13, 2002
Exhibit 31.1



I, Kenneth T. Neilson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hudson United Bancorp;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(e)and 15d -15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting: and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:    August 9, 2004                                           
|                                                                  
|/s/ KENNETH T. NEILSON                                            
|Kenneth T. Neilson Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer