alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial inforamtion from Moto Photo
Inc.'s 1999 Third Quarter 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,282,193
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,365,162
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,130,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,061,618
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,284,425
<PP&E>                                       4,332,141
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,206,885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,389,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,796,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<COMMON>                                        78,717
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,020,217
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,389,504
<SALES>                                     25,931,139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,169,602
<CGS>                                       19,200,086
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,552,230
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,791,377
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               344,449
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             319,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                617,373
<INCOME-TAX>                                   167,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            784,373
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   784,373
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viropro Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Lee, acting as Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Richard Lee

_______________________________

Richard Lee, Sole Director and Officer

(acts as Chief  Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Date:  July 14, 2005.
#### Frank Williams v. The State.

*No. 638.*

*Decided January 30.*

*1.*Complaint and Information—Amendment of—-Practice.—Article 550, Code of Criminal Procedure, provides, that “any matter in an indictment or information may be amended before announcement for trial by the parties, but not afterwards.” *JB'eld,*that this article was violated when, after issue joined before the jury and the State’s evidence adduced, the court permitted the information to be amended so as to conform to the complaint as to the allegation of time, there being a variance between the date alleged in the complaint and information.

2. Same—Practice on Appeal.—Where, on appeal, there appears a fatal variance between the complaint and information, if the complaint furnishes a. proper basis for another information, the judgment will be reversed and cause remanded.

*101Appeal from the County Court of Hill. Tried below before Hon. W. P. Cunningham, County Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for unlawfully carrying a pistol, the punishment assessed being a fine of $25.

Ho statement necessary.

*Moorman & Bowe,*for appellant,

cited Code Crim. Proc., arts. 430, 550; Hoerr v. The State, 4 Texas Crim. App., 75; Drummond v. The State, 4 Texas Crim. App., 150; Collins v. The State, 5 Texas Crim. App., 37; Williamson v. The State, 5 Texas Crim. App., 485; Hawthorne v. The State, 6 Texas Crim. App., 562; Lanham v. The State, 9 Texas Crim. App., 232; Robbins v. The State, 9 Texas Crim. App., 666; Goddard v. The State, 14 Texas Crim. App. 566; Lee v. The State, 22 Texas Crim. App., 547; Kennedy v. The State, 22 Texas Crim. App., 693.

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSOH, Judge.

The jury having been impaneled, issues joined, and the State’s evidence adduced, the county attorney discovered a variance between the complaint and the information in regard to the date of the alleged offense. The complaint alleged the date to be April 28, 1894, the information the 30th day of May, 1894. Upon motion of the county attorney, resisted by appellant, the court permitted the information to be so amended as to conform to the time alleged in the complaint, and the trial proceeded to appellant’s conviction. This was directly in violation of article 550 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which provides, that “any matter in an indictment or information may be amended at any time before an announcement of ready for trial upon the-merits by both parties, but not afterward. Ho matter of substance can be amended.” The amendment was as to “ matter of form,” but it came too late,, after announcement of ready for trial by both parties. For authorities collated, see Will-son’s Criminal Procedure, section 2154. Inasmuch as the complaint furnishes the basis of a proper information, the judgment will be reversed and cause remanded.

*Beversed and remanded.*

Judges all present and concurring.
§ 130.150 Approval and submission procedures. ( a ) Each railroad must submit an electronic copy in an industry standard format (e.g., Adobe Acrobat, Microsoft Word, or hypertext markup language (HTML)) of the COSRP required by this part. Copies of the response plan must be submitted via commercial carrier to: Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, East Building, 2nd Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Alternatively, the railroad may arrange for secure electronic transfer of the file to PHMSA or email a copy of the plan to *PHMSA.OPA90@dot.gov .*
( b ) If PHMSA determines that a response plan requiring approval does not meet all the requirements of this part, PHMSA will notify the railroad of any alleged deficiencies and provide the railroad an opportunity to respond—including the opportunity for an informal conference—to any proposed plan revisions, as well as an opportunity to correct any deficiencies.
( c ) A railroad that disagrees with PHMSA's determination that a plan contains alleged deficiencies may petition PHMSA for reconsideration within 30 days from the date of receipt of PHMSA's notice. After considering all relevant material presented in writing or at an informal conference, PHMSA will notify the operator of its final decision. The railroad must comply with the final decision within 30 days of issuance, unless PHMSA allows additional time.
( d ) PHMSA will approve the response plan if PHMSA determines that the response plan meets all requirements of this part. PHMSA may consult with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), allowing a Federal On-Scene Coordinator (OSC) to identify concerns regarding a plan's compliance with the statutory and regulatory requirements.
( e ) If PHMSA receives a request from a Federal OSC to review a response plan, PHMSA will give a copy of the response plan to the Federal OSC provided that any requests for the plan are referred to PHMSA. PHMSA may consider Federal OSC comments on: Response techniques; protecting fish, wildlife and environmentally sensitive environments; and consistency with the ACP. PHMSA remains the approving authority for the response plan.
( f ) A railroad may ask for confidential treatment in accordance with the procedures in § 105.30 of this chapter.
-----Original Message----- 

From: hughesbob@comcast.net [mailto:hughesbob@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:35 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Bob Hughes 

363 Old Toll Road 

Madison, CT 06443
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6663

LARRY C. MCFARLAND,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLES TWITCHELL, Lieutenant; DAVID SMITH;

Assistant Warden; MS. WHITTAKER, Special

Housing Counselor; JOHN DOE, Officer; VIRGINIA

SMITH, Chief Nurse; DOCTOR CRAMER, Facility

Physician,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-96-203-R)

Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 24, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry C. McFarland, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander,

Assistant Attorney General, Collin Jefferson Hite, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Mary Lynn Reed,

JACKSON & CAMPBELL, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

McFarland v. Twitchell, No. CA-96-203-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 16, 1997).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 8, 1995 (112), Para 112.6 Treasury-Postal Service Appropriations]
[Page 1320]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.112.6  treasury-postal service appropriations

  On motion of Mr. LIGHTFOOT, by unanimous consent, the bill (H.R. 2020) 
making appropriations for the Treasury Department, the United States 
Postal Service, the Executive Office of the President, and certain 
Independent Agencies, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and 
for other purposes; together with the amendments of the Senate thereto, 
was taken from the Speaker's table.
  When on motion of Mr. LIGHTFOOT, it was,
  Resolved, That the House disagree to the amendments of the Senate and 
agree to the conference asked by the Senate on the disagreeing votes of 
the two Houses thereon.
```
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

EXHIBIT 12.1

Central Power and Light Company
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
For Years Ended December 31,

                                          1997      1996      1995      1994      1993
                                        --------  --------  --------  --------  --------
                                                   (thousands, except ratios)
<S>                                    <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C> 
Operating income                        $251,367  $285,647  $282,184  $256,251  $190,079
Adjustments:
  Income taxes                            39,329    47,227    51,755    51,329   (18,954)
  Provision for deferred
    income taxes                          34,484    51,476   (30,025)   26,659    90,520
  Deferred investment tax credits         (4,819)   (5,553)   (5,789)   (5,789)   (5,806)
  Charges for investments and plant
    development costs, net of tax         (1,281)  (15,569)      --        --        --
  Other income and deductions              7,834     3,997    14,880     1,272     1,663
  Allowance for borrowed and equity
    funds used during construction         3,778     1,845     4,514     3,689     2,618
  Mirror CWIP amortization                    --        --    41,000    68,000    75,702
                                        --------  --------  --------  --------  --------
        Earnings                        $330,692  $369,070  $358,519  $401,411  $335,822
                                        ========  ========  ========  ========  ========


Fixed charges:
  Interest on long-term debt            $105,081  $110,375  $116,205  $111,408  $112,939
  Interest on short-term debt and other   20,613    18,494    19,926    12,365    11,993
  Distributions on Trust Preferred
    Securities                             7,533      --        --        --        --
                                        --------  --------  --------  --------  --------
        Fixed charges                   $133,227  $128,869  $136,131  $123,773  $124,932
                                        ========  ========  ========  ========  ========


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges          2.48      2.86      2.63      3.24      2.69(1)



(1) The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for 1993 was calculated before 
    cumulative effect of change in accounting principles.
</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: juedjuedjued@comcast.net [mailto:juedjuedjued@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:43 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Judith Borgardt 

264 Village Lane 

Bartlett, IL 60103
From: epigrrrl@yahoo.com [mailto:epigrrrl@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:05 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kingsley Weaver 

2415 N. Mozart 

Chicago, IL 60647
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                   5
<MULTIPLIER>                1000

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>              JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                      11,817
<SECURITIES>                5,704
<RECEIVABLES>               3,152
<ALLOWANCES>                0
<INVENTORY>                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>            21,515
<PP&E>                      29,495
<DEPRECIATION>              16,558
<TOTAL-ASSETS>              34,452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>       5,577
<BONDS>                     100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>       0
<PREFERRED>                 0
<COMMON>                    0
<OTHER-SE>                  28,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>34,452
<SALES>                     16,770
<TOTAL-REVENUES>            16,770
<CGS>                       5,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>               5,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>          29
<INCOME-PRETAX>             11,280
<INCOME-TAX>                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>         0
<DISCONTINUED>              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>             0
<CHANGES>                   0
<NET-INCOME>                11,280
<EPS-BASIC>                 1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>               1.04


</TABLE>
From: eshukert@hotmail.com [mailto:eshukert@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:42 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

You know the saying, "If you think education is expensive, try 

ignorance." I say, if you think health care for mental illnesses is 

expensive, add up what it costs not to treat individuals who end up 

homeless and in and out the neverending revolving door between 

emergency rooms and jail. Billions! $$$$$$$$ 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Elfrieda Shukert 

60 San Felipe Ave. 

San Francisco, CA 94127
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Repro-Med Systems, Inc., on Form
10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Sealfon, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Andrew I. Sealfon
---------------------
Andrew I. Sealfon, President, Treasurer,
Chairman of the Board, Director, Chief Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer

October 19, 2007
Searched for **http://www.usip.org/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.usip.org/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                                               EXHIBIT 12

                   AEP TEXAS CENTRAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
        Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                        (in thousands except ratio data)

<CAPTION>

                                                              Year Ended December 31,
                                                  1998      1999      2000      2001      2002
<S>                                            <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Earnings:
  Income Before Extraordinary Item             $161,511  $187,718  $189,567  $184,787  $275,941
  Plus Federal Income Taxes                     126,738    83,508    80,797   174,073    30,102
  Plus State Income Taxes                          -         -        3,532    14,849     3,616
  Plus Provision for Deferred Income Taxes       (8,328)   19,938    16,263   (72,568)  113,655
  Plus Deferred Investment Tax Credits           (3,858)   (5,207)   (5,207)   (5,207)   (5,207)
  Plus Fixed Charges (as below)                 124,807   118,911   132,785   125,194   132,236
    Total Earnings                             $400,870  $404,868  $417,737  $421,128  $550,343

Fixed Charges:
  Interest on Long-term Debt                   $ 93,301  $ 87,413  $ 96,212  $ 86,980  $ 99,839*
  Interest on Short-term Debt                    19,506    19,498    22,830    25,023    19,442*
  Distributions on Trust Preferred Securities    12,000    12,000    11,940    11,208    10,560
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals      -         -        1,803     1,983     2,395
     Fixed Charges                             $124,807  $118,911  $132,785  $125,194  $132,236

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                 3.21      3.40      3.14      3.36      4.16

* Certain  amounts have been  reclassified  between  interest on short-term  and
long-term   debt   compared   to  periods   prior  to  January  1,  2002.   This
reclassification had no affect on the ratio.
</TABLE>