```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, September 19, 1995 (117), Para 117.6 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 1617]
[Page 1374]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.117.6  providing for the consideration of h.r. 1617

  Mrs. WALDHOLTZ, by direction of the Committee on Rules, called up the 
following resolution (H. Res. 222):

       Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 
     resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule 
     XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 
     Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 
     the bill (H.R. 1617) to consolidate and reform workforce 
     development and literacy programs, and for other purposes. 
     The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 
     General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
     exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
     chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
     Economic and Educational Opportunities. After general debate 
     the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-
     minute rule. In lieu of the amendment recommended by the 
     Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities now 
     printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an 
     original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-
     minute rule an amendment in the nature of a substitute 
     consisting of the text of H.R. 2332. That amendment in the 
     nature of a substitute shall be considered by title rather 
     than by section. The first six sections and each title shall 
     be considered as read. Points of order against that amendment 
     in the nature of a substitute for failure to comply with 
     clause 5(a) of rule XXI or section 302(f) or 401(b) of the 
     Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are waived. Before 
     consideration of any other amendment it shall be in order to 
     consider the amendment printed in the report of the Committee 
     on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by 
     Representative Goodling or his designee. That amendment shall 
     be considered as read, may amend the portions of the bill not 
     yet read for amendment, shall be debatable for ten minutes 
     equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 
     opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be 
     subject to a demand for division of the question in the House 
     or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against 
     that amendment are waived. After disposition of that 
     amendment, the provisions of the bill as then perfected shall 
     be considered as original text. During further consideration 
     of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of 
     the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 
     whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be 
     printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated 
     for that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments so 
     printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of 
     consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 
     rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 
     may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote 
     in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the 
     Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of a 
     substitute made in order as original text. The previous 
     question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
     amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
     motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
     instructions.

  When said resolution was considered.
  After debate,
  On motion of Mrs. WALDHOLTZ, the previous question was ordered on the 
resolution to its adoption or rejection.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House agree to said resolution?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. FOLEY, announced that the yeas had it.
  Mr. HALL of Ohio demanded that the vote be taken by the yeas and nays, 
which demand was supported by one-fifth of the Members present, so the 
yeas and nays were ordered.
  The vote was taken by electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

388

affirmative

Nays

2
```