alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 179.102-4 Vinyl fluoride, stabilized. Each tank used to transport vinyl fluoride, stabilized, must comply with the following special requirements: ( a ) All plates for the tank must be fabricated of material listed in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, and appurtenances must be fabricated of material listed in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section. ( 1 ) Stainless steel, ASTM A 240/A 240M (IBR, *see* § 171.7 of this subchapter), Type 304, 304L, 316 or 316L, in which case impact tests are not required; or
( 2 ) Steel complying with ASTM Specification A 516 (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter); Grade 70; ASTM Specification A 537 (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter), Class 1; or AAR Specification TC 128, Grade B, in which case impact tests must be performed as follows: ( i ) ASTM A 516/A 516M and A 537/A 537M material must meet the Charpy V-Notch test requirements, in longitudinal direction of rolling, of ASTM A 20/A 20M (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter).
( ii ) AAR Specification TC 128 material must meet the Charpy V-Notch test requirements, in longitudinal direction of rolling, of 15 ft.-lb. minimum average for 3 specimens, with a 10 ft.-lb. minimum for any one specimen, at minus 50 °F or colder, in accordance with ASTM A 370 (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter).
( iii ) Production welded test plates must— ( A ) Be prepared in accordance with AAR Specifications for Tank Cars, appendix W, W4.00 (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter);
( B ) Include impact specimens of weld metal and heat affected zone prepared and tested in accordance with AAR Specifications for Tank Cars, appendix W, W9.00; and
( C ) Meet the same impact requirements as the plate material.
( b ) Insulation must be of approved material.
( c ) Excess flow valves must be installed under all liquid and vapor valves, except safety relief valves.
( d ) A thermometer well may be installed.
( e ) Only an approved gaging device may be installed.
( f ) A pressure gage may be installed.
( g ) Aluminum, copper, silver, zinc, or an alloy containing any of these metals may not be used in the tank construction, or in fittings in contact with the lading.
( h ) The jacket must be stenciled, adjacent to the water capacity stencil, MINIMUM OPERATING TEMPERATURE __ °F.
( i ) The tank car and insulation must be designed to prevent the vapor pressure of the lading from increasing from the pressure at the maximum allowable filling density to the start-to-discharge pressure of the reclosing pressure relief valve within 30 days, at an ambient temperature of 90 °F.
[Amdt. 179-32, 48 FR 27707, June 16, 1983, as amended at 49 FR 24317, June 12, 1984; 49 FR 42736, Oct. 24, 1984; Amdt. 179-45, 55 FR 52728, Dec. 21, 1990; Amdt. 179-52, 61 FR 28680, June 5, 1996; 65 FR 58632, Sept. 29, 2000; 66 FR 33452, June 21, 2001; 66 FR 45186, 45390, Aug. 28, 2001; 67 FR 51660, Aug. 8, 2002; 68 FR 75758, 75760 Dec. 31, 2003]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 27, 1995 (103), Para 103.35 Adjournment]
[Page 1213]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.103.35  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. SOLOMON, at 11 o'clock and 32 minutes p.m., the House 
adjourned.
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 104 (Thursday, May 31, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 30359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2726]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC).
* * * * *

ACTION: Notice of EAC Standards Board Virtual Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date and Time: Monday, June 18, 2007, 7 a.m. EDT through Wednesday, 
June 20, 5 p.m. EDT.

Place: EAC Standards Board Virtual Meeting Room at www.eac.gov. Once at 
the main page of EAC's Web site, viewers should click the link to the 
Standards Board Virtual Meeting Room. The virtual meeting room will 
open on Monday, June 18, 2007, at 7 a.m. EDT and will close on 
Wednesday, June 20, at 5 p.m. EDT. The site will be available 24 hours 
per day during that 3-day period.
    Purpose: The EAC Standards Board will consider a draft letter to be 
sent to Members of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives 
concerning The Ballot Integrity Act of 2007 and H.R. 811 and a motion 
directing the Executive Board to send the letter. The EAC Standards 
Board Virtual Meeting Room was established to enable the Standards 
Board to conduct business when it is not feasible for an in-person 
board meeting. The Standards Board will discuss the draft letter by 
posting written comments and questions on the Virtual Meeting Room site 
on Monday, June 18 and Tuesday, June 19, and will vote on the motion by 
posting Yea or Nay votes on the Virtual Meeting Room site on Wednesday, 
June 20, 2007.
    This activity is open to the public. The public may view the 
proceedings of this virtual meeting by visiting the EAC Standards Board 
virtual meeting room at www.eac.gov at any time between Monday, June 
18, 2007, 7 a.m. EDT and Wednesday, June 20, 2007, 5 p.m. EDT. The 
public may file written statements to the EAC Standards Board at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6615120708020714021504090714022603070548010910"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e49790858a8085968097868b859680a4818587ca838b92">[email protected]</span></a>. Data on EAC's Web site is accessible to 
visitors with disabilities and meets the requirements of section 508 of 
the Rehabilitation Act.

Person to Contact for Information: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 
566-3100.
* * * * *

Donetta L. Davidson,
Chair, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-2726 Filed 5-29-07; 3:34 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 32(b)**

** **

| Cleco  Power LLC                               |
|------------------------------------------------|
| CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO                     |
| 18  U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                       |
| AS  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                        |
| SECTION  906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 |

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Cleco Power LLC (the "Company")on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David M. Eppler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Dilek Samil,Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Finance of Cleco Power LLC, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1) The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

| /s/David M.  Eppler                                |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| David M. Eppler                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                       |

 

| /s/Dilek  Samil                                |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dilek Samil                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|     and Senior Vice President of  Finance                                                                                                                                             |
-----Original Message----- 

From: emma.doineau@gmail.com [mailto:emma.doineau@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:26 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Emma Doineau 

1837 Tutwiler Ave Apt 4 

Memphis, TN 38107
Second Amendment to 2004 Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 10.12 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 
 2004 STOCK OPTION PLAN OF GOODMAN GLOBAL, INC. 
 Goodman Global, Inc. (the “Company”), a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, has previously adopted the 2004
Stock Option Plan of Goodman Global, Inc. (as amended from time to time, the “Plan”). 
 In order to amend the Plan in
certain respects, this Second Amendment to the Plan has been adopted by a resolution of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company on December 29, 2005, effective as set forth below. This Second Amendment to the Plan,
together with the Plan, constitutes the entire Plan as amended to date. 
 1. Effective as of December 29, 2005, Section 2.1 of the
Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
 Section 2.1 Shares Subject to Plan. The shares of stock
subject to Options shall be shares of Common Stock. Subject to Section 7.1, the aggregate number of such shares which may be issued upon exercise of Options shall not exceed 633,052 shares of Common Stock. 
 * * * * * * * * 
 Executed as of
December 29, 2005 
  

			
	GOODMAN GLOBAL, INC.
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Ben D. Campbell

		 	 Officer
Searched for **http://www.cftc.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.cftc.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2119 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2119

 To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require certain 
 disclosure and reports relating to polling by telephone or electronic 
                                device.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 1995

  Mr. Petri introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require certain 
 disclosure and reports relating to polling by telephone or electronic 
                                device.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DISCLOSURE AND REPORTS RELATING TO POLLING BY TELEPHONE OR 
              ELECTRONIC DEVICE.
    Title III of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 
431 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``disclosure and reports relating to polling by telephone or electronic 
                                 device

    ``Sec. 323. (a) Any person who conducts a Federal election poll by 
telephone or electronic device shall disclose to each respondent the 
identity of the person paying the expenses of the poll. The disclosure 
shall be made at the end of the interview involved.
    ``(b) In the case of any Federal election poll by telephone or 
electronic device--
            ``(1) if the results are not to be made public, the person 
        who conducts the poll shall report to the Commission the total 
        cost of the poll and all sources of funds for the poll; and
            ``(2) if more than 400 households are surveyed, the person 
        who conducts the poll shall report to the Commission the total 
        number of households contacted, and include with such report a 
        copy of the poll questions.
    ``(c) As used in this section, the term `Federal election poll' 
means a survey in which the respondent is asked to state a preference 
in a future election for Federal office.'.
                                 <all>
```
#### Dolly M. LOVE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 14499.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Sept. 26, 1958.

Decided Oct. 2, 1958.

Mr. Charles B. Murray, Washington, D. C., for appellant. Mr. Robert I. Miller, Washington, D. C., was on the brief for appellant.

Mr. Edgar T. Bellinger, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for appel-lee.

Before Edgerton, Chief Judge, and Wilbur K. Miller and Danaher, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a conviction and sentence for manslaughter. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.
-----Original Message----- 

From: jbombasaro@gmail.com [mailto:jbombasaro@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:23 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

jessia Bombasaro-Brady 

149 High St 

Hingham, MA 02043
From: anndrake1@gmail.com [mailto:anndrake1@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:51 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ann Drake 

29 Old Salem Road 

Gloucester, MA 01930
#### § 172.822 Limitation on actions by states, local governments, and Indian tribes.

A law, order, or other directive of a state, political subdivision of a state, or an Indian tribe that designates, limits, or prohibits the use of a rail line (other than a rail line owned by a state, political subdivision of a state, or an Indian tribe) for the transportation of hazardous materials, including, but not limited to, the materials specified in § 172.820(a), is preempted. 49 U.S.C. 5125, 20106.

[73 FR 20772, Apr. 16, 2008]
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Repro-Med Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
I. Sealfon, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Andrew I. Sealfon
Andrew I. Sealfon
Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer

July 15, 2005
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAAzotL/- »M~ 2 '2/-/f _S) Directorate Identifier: -AD 

(f'.nJ/1 muke change.\· tu thl! l'alue.,· in the tohle heloll'. you must ensure tlil' totals updatl' ac:c:ordingly. (f 

they do not. dick (or Tah) into lll/(lfhcn ow 1l[the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access. testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Every Inspection 1.0 ' I - ( I 120 ill 

I 'I '• I) 1 11 

t•l , II ' I I" 

I'' () Ill I 1 I 

I fll I I) I I 

' (J I'll 

lit ill I 1 

tH q ,, 

Ill I I) 

' ·I I I 'II 

II I IJ 11 

'.II( () llt J II!) 

'' ( l ill () 

•I I ' I 10 f) 

Ill ,, ill I) 

I I Ill • I 

<'I II df} ' 

II Ill I 

I I I ' 

I I '" 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $10,200 

Costs covered under warranty (if/mown) $ 

On-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close- replacement) up) 

Radome Replc1t 8 I $0 (), I 

. I ' ' 'I 

' ... I •l 

I) dil 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): $1 0,200 total 
compliance cost is identfied for the US Fleet for each inspection. Please note that the DAH 

assumes radome costs if replacement beocmes neccessary. 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? G 

YES* D NO [gj 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? 

YES* D NO [gj 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. ~ 

YES D NO [gj 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? • 

YES* D NO [81 

*Explanation:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 31, 1995 (105), Para 105.19 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 2126]
[Page 1227]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.105.19  providing for the consideration of h.r. 2126

  Mr. GOSS, by direction of the Committee on Rules, called up the 
following resolution (H. Res. 205):

       Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 
     resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule 
     XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 
     Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 
     the bill (H.R. 2126) making appropriations for the Department 
     of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and 
     for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be 
     dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of 
     the bill for failure to comply with clause 2(1)(6) of the 
     rule XI, clause 7 of rule XXI, or section 306 of the 
     Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are waived. General debate 
     shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour 
     equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
     minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After 
     general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 
     under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered by 
     title rather than by paragraph. Each title shall be 
     considered as read. Points of order against provisions in the 
     bill for failure to comply with clause 2 or 6 of rule XXI are 
     waived. An amendment striking section 8021 and 8024 of the 
     bill shall be considered as adopted in the House and in the 
     Committee of the Whole. During consideration of the bill for 
     amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may 
     accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the 
     Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in 
     the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that 
     purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments so printed 
     shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of 
     consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 
     rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 
     may have been adopted. The previous question shall be 
     considered as ordered on the bill and amendment thereto to 
     final passage without intervening motion except one motion to 
     recommit with or without instructions.

  When said resolution was considered.
  After debate,
  On motion of Mr. GOSS, the previous question was ordered on the 
resolution to its adoption or rejection.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House agree to said resolution?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, announced that 
the yeas had it.
  Mr. LARGENT objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  A quorum not being present,
  The roll was called under clause 4, rule XV, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

Yeas

409

When there appeared

Nays

1
```