alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 176.15 Enforcement. ( a ) An enforcement officer of the U.S. Coast Guard may at any time and at any place, within the jurisdiction of the United States, board any vessel for the purpose of enforcement of this subchapter and inspect any shipment of hazardous materials as defined in this subchapter.
( b ) [Reserved]
[Amdt. 176-1, 41 FR 16110, Apr. 15, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 176-1A, 41 FR 40687, Sept. 20, 1976; Amdt. 176-24, 51 FR 5974, Feb. 18, 1986]
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.721 Distribution systems: Patrolling. ( a ) The frequency of patrolling mains must be determined by the severity of the conditions which could cause failure or leakage, and the consequent hazards to public safety.
( b ) Mains in places or on structures where anticipated physical movement or external loading could cause failure or leakage must be patrolled— ( 1 ) In business districts, at intervals not exceeding 41 ⁄ 2 months, but at least four times each calendar year; and
( 2 ) Outside business districts, at intervals not exceeding 71 ⁄ 2 months, but at least twice each calendar year.
[35 FR 13257, Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 192-43, 47 FR 46851, Oct. 21, 1982; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28786, June 6, 1996]
July 6 , 2015

Mr. Mike Elliott

Mr. George K. Purdy IV

Owners

Drone Services Hawaii LLC

98− 1827A Kaahumanu Street

Aiea, HI 96701

Dear Messrs. Elliot and Purdy:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemptio n from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your April 1 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0883 ), but

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does no t comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further,

you must send us all of the following:

 The reas ons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your reques t any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t He ar From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### § 178.33c Specification 2P; inner nonrefillable metal receptacle variation.
§ 1109.5 Resolution of certain disputes involving the State Sponsored Route Committee and the Northeast Corridor Commission. ( a ) In addition to the mediation procedures under this part that are available following the filing of a complaint in a proceeding before the Board, Amtrak or a State member of the State Supported Route Committee established under 49 U.S.C. 24712 may request that the Board informally assist in securing outside professional mediation services in order to resolve disputes arising from: Implementation of, or compliance with, the cost allocation methodology for State-Supported Routes developed under section 209 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 or amended under 49 U.S.C. 24712(a)(6); invoices or reports provided under 49 U.S.C. 24712(b); or rules and procedures implemented by the State Supported Route Committee under 49 U.S.C. 24712(a)(4). With respect to a particular dispute, such a request for informal assistance in securing outside professional mediation services may be submitted to the Board: ( 1 ) In the absence of a complaint proceeding before the Board; or
( 2 ) If, while a formal complaint is pending before the Board, a motion is filed in that formal proceeding requesting that it be held in abeyance in light of the request for informal assistance.
( b ) In addition to the mediation procedures under this part that are available following the filing of a complaint in a proceeding before the Board, the Northeast Corridor Commission established under 49 U.S.C. 24905, Amtrak, or public authorities providing commuter rail passenger transportation on the Northeast Corridor may request that the Board informally assist in securing outside professional mediation services in order to resolve disputes involving implementation of, or compliance with, the policy developed under 49 U.S.C. 24905(c)(1). With respect to a particular dispute, such a request for informal assistance in securing outside professional mediation services may be submitted to the Board: ( 1 ) In the absence of a complaint proceeding before the Board; or
( 2 ) If, while a formal complaint is pending before the Board, a motion is filed in that formal proceeding requesting that it be held in abeyance in light of the request for informal assistance.
( c ) A request for informal Board assistance in securing outside professional mediation services under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section shall be submitted by letter duly authorized to be submitted to the Board by the requesting party. The request letter shall be addressed to the Director of the Board's Office of Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance, and shall include a concise description of the issues for which outside professional mediation services are sought. The Office of Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance shall contact the requesting party in response to such request within 14 days of receipt of the request.
[81 FR 85904, Nov. 29, 2016]
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 1859

EVETTE E. HAGY, Widow of Jerry R. Hagy
,

Petitioner
,

v.
WELLMORE COAL COMPANY, c/o Wellmore Energy; SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS ’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
, Respondents

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board . ( 19

- 0362 BLA )

Submitted : August 23, 2022 Decided: August 25, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge
, HEYTENS, Circuit Judge , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Evette E. Hagy, Petitioner Pro Se. James Mark Poerio, POERIO & WALTER, INC., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Jeffrey Steven Goldberg, Gary K. Stearman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 20-1859 Doc: 22 Filed: 08/25/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:

Evette E. Hagy petitions for review of the Benefits Review Board ’s (BRB) decision

and order af firming the A dministrative L aw J udge’s (ALJ) denial of black lung benefits

pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901

- 94 4

. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised

in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hagy’s informal brief does not

chall enge the basis for the ALJ and BRB’s decisions, she has forfeited review of these

orders. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is

an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues

preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review . We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional proces s.

PETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 20-1859 Doc: 22 Filed: 08/25/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.317 Protection from hazards. ( a ) The operator must take all practicable steps to protect each transmission line or main from washouts, floods, unstable soil, landslides, or other hazards that may cause the pipeline to move or to sustain abnormal loads. In addition, the operator must take all practicable steps to protect offshore pipelines from damage by mud slides, water currents, hurricanes, ship anchors, and fishing operations.
( b ) Each aboveground transmission line or main, not located offshore or in inland navigable water areas, must be protected from accidental damage by vehicular traffic or other similar causes, either by being placed at a safe distance from the traffic or by installing barricades.
( c ) Pipelines, including pipe risers, on each platform located offshore or in inland navigable waters must be protected from accidental damage by vessels.
[Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34606, Aug. 16, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28784, June 6, 1996]
#### Emily Johnson, Appellant, *v.*First National Bank of Franklin, Respondent.

*Johnson*v. *First Nat. Bank of Franklin,*132 App. Div. 524, affirmed.

(Argued January 10, 1911;

decided January 27, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 18, 1909, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial, and granted a new trial in an action to recover for an alleged conversion of certain shares of stock.

*W. F. White*for appellant.

*C. L. Andrus*for respondent.

*594Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against the appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
#### § 180.507 Qualification of tank cars.

(a) Each tank car marked as meeting a “DOT” specification or any other tank car used for the transportation of a hazardous material must meet the requirements of this subchapter or the applicable specification to which the tank was constructed.

(b)

(1) Tank cars prescribed in the following table are no longer authorized for construction but may remain in hazardous materials service provided they conform to all applicable safety requirements of this subchapter:

| Specification prescribed in the current regulations | Other specifications permitted | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 105A200W | 105A100W | 1 |
| 105A200ALW | 105A100ALW | 1 |

Table 1 to Paragraph (b)(1)

Note 1 to Table 1 to paragraph (b)(1):

Tanks built as Specification DOT 105A100W or DOT 105A100ALW may be altered and converted to DOT 105A200W and DOT 105A200ALW, respectively.

(2) [Reserved]

(3) Specification DOT-113A175W, DOT-113C60W, DOT-113D60W, and DOT-113D120W tank cars may continue in use, but new construction is not authorized.

(4) Class DOT 105A and 105S tank cars used to transport hydrogen chloride, refrigerated liquid under the terms of DOT-E 3992 may continue in service, but new construction is not authorized.

(5) Specification DOT-103A-ALW, 103AW, 103ALW, 103ANW, 103BW, 103CW, 103DW, 103EW, and 104W tank cars may continue in use, but new construction is not authorized.

[Amdt. 180-8, 60 FR 49079, Sept. 21, 1995, as amended at 68 FR 48572, Aug. 14, 2003; 77 FR 37987, June 25, 2012; 87 FR 79785, Dec. 27, 2022]
-----Original Message----- 

From: haplon@gmail.com [mailto:haplon@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:10 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Alex Stentz 

3115 sw 12th ave. #210 

Portland, OR 97239
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 6 , 2013 

# Order

Clerk November 6, 2013

146824 ( 85 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 146824

v COA: 302132

Wayne CC: 06

- 008265

- FH

CARL JESSE HOUGH,

Defendant

- Appellant.

______________________________ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the time

for filing an a nswer to defendant

- appellant’s application for leave to appeal is

GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if it is filed on or before

January 8, 2014.
**EXHIBIT
      31.1**





Certifications





I,
      Lei,
      Ming, Chief Executive Officer certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Dark Dynamite Inc.





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing
      and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(c) and 15d-(e)) for the registrant and have:





a) Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidates subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;





b) Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures, and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed
      in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal period that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
      registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
      could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
      and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors
      any
      material weaknesses in internal controls (all of which do not apply);
      and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls, (all of which
      do
      not apply); and








Date:
      April 15, 2006








/s/
      Lei, Ming


Lei,
      Ming
Presidential Documents

38997 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 136 

Tuesday, July 17, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8162 of July 12, 2007 

Death of Lady Bird Johnson 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

As a mark of respect for the memory of Lady Bird Johnson, I hereby order, 

by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United 

States of America, that on the day of her interment, the flag of the United 

States shall be flown at half-staff at the White House and upon all public 

buildings and grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and on 

all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia 

and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions until 

sunset on such day. I also direct that the flag shall be flown at halfstaff for the same period at all United States embassies, legations, consular 

offices, and other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval 

vessels and stations. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twelfth day 

of July, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07–3498 

Filed 7–16–07; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES6GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
#### § 1242.24 Shop buildings—other equipment (account XX-19-26).

Assign directly to freight (or as particular facts suggest otherwise).
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2137 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2137

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 to 
 require the release of relevant information to protect the public from 
                       sexually violent offenders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``Megan's Law''.

SEC. 2. RELEASE OF INFORMATION AND CLARIFICATION OF PUBLIC NATURE OF 
              INFORMATION.

    Section 170101(d) of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement 
Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 14071(d)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(d) Release of Information.--
        ``(1) The information collected under a State registration 
    program may be disclosed for any purpose permitted under the laws 
    of the State.
        ``(2) The designated State law enforcement agency and any local 
    law enforcement agency authorized by the State agency shall release 
    relevant information that is necessary to protect the public 
    concerning a specific person required to register under this 
    section, except that the identity of a victim of an offense that 
    requires registration under this section shall not be released.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of Industry and Security

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of Tuesday, March 20, 2007, the Bureau of Industry and Security published an Order denying the export privileges of Maurice Subilia at 13085. This notice is being published to correct certain standard language regarding the scope of the “Denied Person” in that Order, which was defined in a way that made Maurice Subilia appear as a corporation rather than an individual. Paragraph I of the text of the Order currently defines the scope of the “Denied Person” as follows: “* * * Maurice Subilia, 17 Oakwood Road, Kennebunkport, ME 04046, his successors or assigns and when acting for or on behalf of Subilia, his officers, representatives, agents, or employees * * *.” This language should instead read as follows: “ * * * Maurice Subilia, 17 Oakwood Road, Kennebunkport, ME 04046, and when acting for or on behalf of Subilia, his representatives, assigns, agents, or employees * * *.”.                

Dated: July 31, 2007.

Eileen M. Albanese, 

Director, Office of Exporter Services.

[FR Doc. 07-3888 Filed 8-8-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 192

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

#### § 192.111 Design factor (*F*) for steel pipe.

(a) Except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section, the design factor to be used in the design formula in § 192.105 is determined in accordance with the following table:

| Class location | Design factor (*F*) |
| --- | --- |
| 1 | 0.72 |
| 2 | 0.60 |
| 3 | 0.50 |
| 4 | 0.40 |

(b) A design factor of 0.60 or less must be used in the design formula in § 192.105 for steel pipe in Class 1 locations that:

(1) Crosses the right-of-way of an unimproved public road, without a casing;

(2) Crosses without a casing, or makes a parallel encroachment on, the right-of-way of either a hard surfaced road, a highway, a public street, or a railroad;

(3) Is supported by a vehicular, pedestrian, railroad, or pipeline bridge; or

(4) Is used in a fabricated assembly, (including separators, mainline valve assemblies, cross-connections, and river crossing headers) or is used within five pipe diameters in any direction from the last fitting of a fabricated assembly, other than a transition piece or an elbow used in place of a pipe bend which is not associated with a fabricated assembly.

(c) For Class 2 locations, a design factor of 0.50, or less, must be used in the design formula in § 192.105 for uncased steel pipe that crosses the right-of-way of a hard surfaced road, a highway, a public street, or a railroad.

(d) For Class 1 and Class 2 locations, a design factor of 0.50, or less, must be used in the design formula in § 192.105 for—

(1) Steel pipe in a compressor station, regulating station, or measuring station; and

(2) Steel pipe, including a pipe riser, on a platform located offshore or in inland navigable waters.

[35 FR 13257, Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34605, Aug. 16, 1976]