United States
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

                    For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003


[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-11934


                          CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XVIII
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



         California                                              94-2834149
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                         55 Beattie Place, P.O. Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

<PAGE>

                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


                          CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XVIII
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                                  June 30, 2003

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Assets
<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $  592
   Receivables and deposits                                                      62
   Restricted escrows                                                           151
   Other assets                                                                 241
   Investment properties:
      Land                                                   $ 7,296
      Buildings and related personal property                  21,766
                                                               29,062
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (14,191)       14,871
                                                                           $ 15,917
Liabilities and Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 24
   Other liabilities                                                            233
   Accrued property taxes                                                       227
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                           84
   Mortgage notes payable                                                    18,350

Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
   General partner                                           $ (6,249)
   Limited partners (75,000 units issued and
      outstanding)                                              3,248        (3,001)
                                                                           $ 15,917



            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                          CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XVIII
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                       Three Months Ended             Six Months Ended
                                            June 30,                      June 30,
                                       2003           2002           2003          2002
Revenues:
<S>                                  <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
  Rental income                      $ 1,040        $ 1,111        $ 2,065        $ 2,253
  Other income                           110            109            221            227
      Total revenues                   1,150          1,220          2,286          2,480

Expenses:
   Operating                             434            568            892          1,043
   General and administrative             69             70            139            148
   Depreciation                          224            220            446            438
   Interest                              332            336            664            673
   Property tax                          114            122            223            243
      Total expenses                   1,173          1,316          2,364          2,545

Net loss                              $ (23)         $ (96)         $ (78)         $ (65)

Net loss allocated to general
  partner (9.9%)                       $ (2)         $ (10)          $ (8)         $ (7)
Net loss allocated to limited
   partners (90.1%)                      (21)           (86)           (70)           (58)

                                      $ (23)         $ (96)         $ (78)         $ (65)

Net loss per limited
  partnership unit                   $ (0.28)       $ (1.15)       $ (0.93)       $ (0.77)

Distributions per limited
  partnership unit                     $ --          $ 2.96         $ 1.49        $ 2.96

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XVIII
        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (DEFICIENCY) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                     Limited
                                   Partnership    General      Limited
                                      Units       Partner      Partners      Total

<S>                                   <C>           <C>        <C>          <C>
Original capital contributions        75,000        $ --       $75,000      $75,000

Partners' (deficiency) capital
   at December 31, 2002               75,000      $(6,240)     $ 3,430      $(2,810)

Distributions to partners                 --           (1)        (112)        (113)

Net loss for the six months
   ended June 30, 2003                    --           (8)         (70)         (78)

Partners' (deficiency) capital
   at June 30, 2003                   75,000      $(6,249)     $ 3,248      $(3,001)

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                          CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XVIII
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  Six Months Ended
                                                                        June 30,
                                                                  2003          2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                              <C>          <C>
  Net loss                                                       $ (78)       $ (65)
  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided
   by operating activities:
     Depreciation                                                   446          438
     Amortization of loan costs                                      30           30
     Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                       (2)           6
      Other assets                                                 (100)         (76)
      Accounts payable                                              (22)          34
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                            28           (9)
      Accrued property taxes                                       (115)        (123)
      Other liabilities                                              79          176
        Net cash provided by operating activities                   266          411

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (116)        (106)
  Net deposits to restricted escrows                                (32)         (24)
        Net cash used in investing activities                      (148)        (130)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Distributions to partners                                        (113)        (224)
  Payments on mortgage notes payable                               (129)        (130)
        Net cash used in financing activities                      (242)        (354)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                          (124)         (73)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                    716          613
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                       $ 592        $ 540

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                         $ 590        $ 582

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                          CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XVIII
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)
Note A - Basis of Presentation

The  accompanying   unaudited   consolidated  financial  statements  of  Century
Properties Fund XVIII (the  "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial  statements.  The Partnership's  general partner is Fox Partners.  The
general partners of Fox Partners are Fox Capital Management  Corporation ("FCMC"
or the  "Managing  General  Partner"),  Fox  Realty  Investors  ("FRI")  and Fox
Partners  82. The Managing  General  Partner,  as well as the  managing  general
partner of FRI, are affiliates of Apartment  Investment  and Management  Company
("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. In the opinion of the
Managing  General  Partner,  all  adjustments  (consisting  of normal  recurring
accruals)  considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.
Operating  results for the three and six month  periods  ended June 30, 2003 are
not  necessarily  indicative  of the results that may be expected for the fiscal
year  ending  December  31,  2003.  For  further   information,   refer  to  the
consolidated   financial  statements  and  footnotes  thereto  included  in  the
Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The  Partnership  has no employees  and is  dependent  on the  Managing  General
Partner  and  its  affiliates  for  the  management  and  administration  of all
Partnership  activities.  The Partnership Agreement provides for (i) payments to
affiliates for services and (ii)  reimbursement of certain expenses  incurred by
affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

Affiliates of the Managing  General  Partner are entitled to receive 5% of gross
receipts  from  both of the  Partnership's  properties  for  providing  property
management  services.  The  Partnership  paid to such  affiliates  approximately
$113,000  and  $129,000  for the six  months  ended  June  30,  2003  and  2002,
respectively, which is included in operating expenses.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  received   reimbursement  of
accountable  administrative  expenses  amounting  to  approximately  $80,000 and
$89,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively,  which is
included in general and administrative expenses.

As  compensation  for the  services  rendered in managing the  Partnership,  the
Managing  General  Partner is entitled to receive a Partnership  Management  Fee
equal to 9% of  distributions  from  operations  as defined  in the  Partnership
Agreement.  During the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002,  no amounts were
paid to the  Managing  General  Partner  as all  distributions  were  made  from
cumulative undistributed sales and refinancing proceeds.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  has  made  available  to the
Partnership  a  credit  line  of  up to  $150,000  per  property  owned  by  the
Partnership. At the present time, the Partnership has no outstanding amounts due
under this line of credit.

The  Partnership  insures its properties up to certain  limits through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the AIMCO limits through
insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers  unaffiliated  with the
Managing  General  Partner.  During the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002,
the  Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates  approximately  $66,000
and $79,000,  respectively,  for  insurance  coverage and fees  associated  with
policy claims administration.

Note C - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking  dismissal
of the action.  In lieu of responding  to the motion,  the  plaintiffs  filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint, which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order  sustaining  defendants'  demurrer on certain  grounds.  On July 20, 2001,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001,
Plaintiffs  filed a fourth amended class and  derivative  action  complaint.  On
September 12, 2001, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.  On
October 5, 2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated  defendants filed a
demurrer to the fourth amended complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001.
On February 2, 2002,  the Court served its order  granting in part the demurrer.
The Court dismissed without leave to amend certain of the plaintiffs' claims. On
February 11, 2002, plaintiffs filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class
comprised  of all  non-affiliated  persons  who own or have  owned  units in the
partnerships. The Managing General Partner and affiliated defendants opposed the
motion.  On April 29, 2002, the Court held a hearing on  plaintiffs'  motion for
class certification and took the matter under submission after further briefing,
as ordered by the court,  was  submitted by the parties.  On July 10, 2002,  the
Court  entered an order  vacating the trial date of January 13, 2003 (as well as
the pre-trial and discovery  cut-off  dates) and stayed the case in its entirety
through  November  7, 2002 so that the  parties  could  have an  opportunity  to
discuss  settlement.  On October 30, 2002, the court entered an order  extending
the stay in effect through January 10, 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first  amended  complaint.  The  Heller  action  was  brought  as a  purported
derivative  action,  and  asserted  claims for,  among other  things,  breach of
fiduciary duty, unfair competition,  conversion, unjust enrichment, and judicial
dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a motion to consolidate  the
Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that the Heller action was filed
in order to preserve the derivative  claims that were dismissed without leave to
amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated July 10, 2001. On October 5,
2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated defendants moved to strike the
first amended  complaint in its entirety for violating the Court's July 10, 2001
order  granting in part and denying in part  defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes
action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of the complaint based on
the  statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the action  demurred to the
fourth amended complaint, and, alternatively,  moved to strike the complaint. On
December 11, 2001,  the court heard argument on the motions and took the matters
under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court  served  notice of its order
granting defendants' motion to strike the Heller complaint as a violation of its
July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On March 27,  2002,  the  plaintiffs
filed a notice  appealing the order  striking the complaint.  Before  completing
briefing on the appeal, the parties stayed further  proceedings in the appeal in
light of a settlement.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action described below.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the Managing General Partner has also agreed to make
a tender offer to purchase all of the partnership  interests in the Partnerships
within one year of final  approval,  if it is granted,  and to provide  partners
with the  independent  appraisals  at the time of these  tenders.  The  proposed
settlement  also provided for the  limitation  of the allowable  costs which the
Managing  General  Partner or its  affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships  in
connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class counsel fees and
costs in this litigation.  On April 11, 2003,  notice was distributed to limited
partners providing the details of the proposed settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  Actual results may differ materially
from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a
variety of risks and factors including,  without limitation:  national and local
economic  conditions;  the terms of  governmental  regulations  that  affect the
Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment
in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks, including the risk that cash
flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal
and interest;  real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and
the general  economic  climate in local markets and  competition  for tenants in
such markets;  litigation,  including  costs  associated  with  prosecuting  and
defending  claims  and  any  adverse   outcomes,   and  possible   environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment properties consist of two apartment complexes. The
following  table sets forth the average  occupancy of the properties for the six
months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.

                                                   Average Occupancy
      Property                                      2003       2002

      Oak Run Apartments                            92%        83%
        Dallas, Texas
      Overlook Point Apartments                     86%        95%
        Salt Lake City, Utah

Occupancy  at  Oak  Run  Apartments  increased  primarily  due  to an  increased
marketing  effort by the  property's  management  team over the past year  which
included a reduction in rental rates.

Occupancy at Overlook  Apartments  decreased due to a weak local economy and low
mortgage interest rates enabling more tenants to buy homes. During the first six
months of 2002  occupancy was higher as a result of temporary  residents for the
Olympics.  Also  impacting the decrease in occupancy for the first six months of
2003 is the deployment of military personnel from the area.

Results of Operations

The Partnership  recognized a net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2003 of
approximately  $78,000 compared to a net loss of  approximately  $65,000 for the
same period in 2002. The  Partnership  recognized a net loss for the three month
period ended June 30, 2003 of  approximately  $23,000  compared to a net loss of
approximately  $96,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002. The increase in
net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2003 is attributable to a decrease in
total revenues  largely offset by a decrease in total expenses.  The decrease in
net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2003 is  attributable to a decrease
in total expenses partially offset by a decrease in total revenues.

For the three and six month periods  ended June 30, 2003,  the decrease in total
revenues is primarily  due to a decrease in rental  income  attributable  to the
decrease in occupancy at Overlook  Point  Apartments  and a reduction in average
rental rates at both of the Partnership's investment properties partially offset
by the increase in occupancy at Oak Run Apartments discussed above.

Total  expenses  for both the three and six month  periods  ended June 30,  2003
decreased due to decreases in operating  and property tax expenses.  General and
administrative,  depreciation and interest expenses stayed  relatively  constant
for the  comparable  periods.  Operating  expenses  decreased  primarily  due to
decreases in maintenance and  administrative  expenses and management  fees. The
decrease  in  maintenance  expense is  attributable  to  decreases  in  interior
painting and improvements and contract cleaning at Oak Run Apartments associated
with the lower  tenant  turnover the  property  has  experienced  as a result of
higher  occupancy  rates.  Administrative  expense  decreased  as a result  of a
decrease in legal  expenses  at Oak Run  Apartments  related to  tenant/employee
issues occurring in the normal course of business.  Management fees decreased in
correlation  with the  decrease in rental  income on which these fees are based.
The decrease in property tax expense is due to a decrease in the assessed  value
by the local  taxing  authorities  at Oak Run  Apartments  and the  receipt of a
refund of 2002 taxes at Overlook  Point  Apartments  during the six months ended
June 30, 2003.

Included in general and administrative expenses is the cost of services provided
by the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  as  allowed  under  the
Partnership Agreement.  Also included in general and administrative expenses are
costs associated with the quarterly and annual communications with investors and
regulatory agencies and the annual audit required by the Partnership Agreement.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the Managing General
Partner monitors the rental market  environment of its investment  properties to
assess the feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy
levels and protecting  the  Partnership  from increases in expenses.  As part of
this plan, the Managing General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from
the burden of  inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and
maintaining a high overall  occupancy  level.  However,  due to changing  market
conditions,  which  can  result  in the use of  rental  concessions  and  rental
reductions to offset softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the
Managing General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2003, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately
$592,000  compared to  approximately  $540,000 at June 30,  2002.  Cash and cash
equivalents  decreased  approximately  $124,000  from  December  31, 2002 due to
approximately  $148,000  and $242,000 of cash used in  investing  and  financing
activities,  respectively,  partially offset by  approximately  $266,000 of cash
provided by operating activities. Cash used in investing activities consisted of
property  improvements  and  replacements  and  deposits to  restricted  escrows
maintained  by one of the mortgage  lenders.  Cash used in financing  activities
consisted  of  principal   payments  made  on  the  mortgages   encumbering  the
Partnership's  properties and  distributions  to the partners.  The  Partnership
invests its working capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  has  made  available  to the
Partnership  a  credit  line  of  up to  $150,000  per  property  owned  by  the
Partnership. At the present time, the Partnership has no outstanding amounts due
under this line of credit.  Other  than cash and cash  equivalents,  the line of
credit is the Partnership's only unused source of liquidity.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures  required at the  properties  to  adequately  maintain the physical
assets and other  operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal,
state, and local legal and regulatory requirements. The Managing General Partner
monitors  developments  in the area of legal and  regulatory  compliance  and is
studying  new  federal  laws,  including  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002.  The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests  additional  compliance measures
with regard to governance,  disclosure, audit and other areas. In light of these
changes,  the Partnership  expects that it will incur higher expenses related to
compliance,  including  increased  legal and audit  fees.  Capital  improvements
planned for each of the Partnership's properties are detailed below.

Oak Run  Apartments:  During the six months ended June 30, 2003 the  Partnership
completed  approximately  $73,000 of capital  improvements at Oak Run Apartments
consisting primarily of floor covering replacements, parking lot resurfacing and
fencing upgrades. These improvements were funded from operations and replacement
reserves.  The  Partnership  evaluates  the  capital  improvement  needs  of the
property during the year and currently expects to complete an additional $73,000
in capital  improvements  during the remainder of 2003  consisting  primarily of
floor covering  replacements,  cabinets and countertops upgrades, and structural
improvements.  Additional  improvements may be considered and will depend on the
physical  condition  of  the  property  as  well  as  replacement  reserves  and
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Overlook  Point  Apartments:  During  the six  months  ended  June 30,  2003 the
Partnership completed  approximately $43,000 of capital improvements at Overlook
Point Apartments consisting primarily of floor covering replacements,  appliance
replacements, and air conditioning upgrades. These improvements were funded from
operations.  The  Partnership  evaluates  the capital  improvement  needs of the
property during the year and currently expects to complete an additional $63,000
in capital  improvements  during the remainder of 2003  consisting  primarily of
floor  covering  and  appliance  replacements.  Additional  improvements  may be
considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as well as
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

The additional capital  expenditures planned will be incurred only to the extent
of cash available from operations and Partnership  reserves.  To the extent that
such  budgeted   capital   improvements   are   completed,   the   Partnership's
distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short
term.

The Partnership's  current assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term
needs (exclusive of capital improvements) of the Partnership.  The Partnership's
mortgage  indebtedness  of  approximately  $18,350,000  is being  amortized over
thirty years with balloon  payments of  approximately  $9,728,000 and $8,127,000
due in October 2004 and  September  2005,  respectively.  The  Managing  General
Partner will attempt to refinance such  indebtedness  and/or sell the properties
prior to such maturity dates. If the properties cannot be refinanced or sold for
a sufficient  amount,  the Partnership  may risk losing such properties  through
foreclosure.

The Partnership  distributed  the following  amounts during the six months ended
June 30, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands, except per unit data):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                       Six Months       Per Limited       Six Months     Per Limited
                          Ended         Partnership         Ended        Partnership
                      June 30, 2003         Unit        June 30, 2002        Unit
Sale and
<S>           <C>         <C>              <C>              <C>             <C>
  Refinancing (1)         $ 113            $1.49            $ 224           $2.96

(1) From prior cumulative undistributed sale and refinancing proceeds.
</TABLE>

Future cash  distributions  will depend on the levels of net cash generated from
operations,   the  availability  of  cash  reserves,  and  the  timing  of  debt
maturities, refinancings and/or property sales. The Partnership's cash available
for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis.  There can be no assurance that
the Partnership  will generate  sufficient  funds from operations after required
capital  improvements  expenditures to permit  additional  distributions  to its
partners during the remainder of 2003 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interests in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 41,681.50 limited partnership units
(the "Units") in the Partnership  representing  55.58% of the total  outstanding
Units at June 30, 2003. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender
offers  made by  AIMCO  or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its
affiliates will acquire  additional  Units in exchange for cash or a combination
of cash and units in the operating  partnership of AIMCO either through  private
purchases or tender offers.  Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement,  unitholders
holding a majority of the Units are  entitled  to take action with  respect to a
variety of matters  that  include,  but are not  limited  to,  voting on certain
amendments  to the  Partnership  Agreement  and  voting to remove  the  Managing
General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 55.58% of the total outstanding
Units,  AIMCO and its  affiliates  are in a  position  to  influence  all voting
decisions with respect to the Partnership. Insignia Properties L.P. ("IPLP"), an
affiliate of AIMCO and the Managing  General  Partner had agreed for the benefit
of third party  unitholders,  that it would vote the 21,513 Units it acquired in
January 1996: (i) against any increase in  compensation  payable to the Managing
General Partner or to its affiliates; and (ii) on all other matters submitted by
it  or  its  affiliates,  in  proportion  to  the  votes  cast  by  third  party
unitholders.  Except for the  foregoing,  no other  limitations  are  imposed on
IPLP's,  AIMCO's  or any of their  affiliates  right  to vote  each  Unit  held.
Although  the Managing  General  Partner  owes  fiduciary  duties to the limited
partners of the  Partnership,  the Managing  General Partner also owes fiduciary
duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the Managing
General Partner, as managing general partner, to the Partnership and its limited
partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Managing  General Partner
to AIMCO, as its sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States which require the Partnership
to  make  estimates  and  assumptions.  The  Partnership  believes  that  of its
significant  accounting  policies,  the following may involve a higher degree of
judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Investment  properties  are  recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying  amount of a property may be  impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's  investment  properties.  These  factors  include  changes  in the
national,  regional and local economic  climate;  local  conditions,  such as an
oversupply  of  multifamily   properties;   competition   from  other  available
multifamily  property  owners and changes in market  rental  rates.  Any adverse
changes in these factors could cause an impairment in the Partnership's assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
Rental income  attributable to leases is recognized  monthly as it is earned and
the Partnership  fully reserves all balances  outstanding  over thirty days. The
Partnership will offer rental concessions during  particularly slow months or in
response to heavy  competition  from other  similar  complexes in the area.  Any
concessions  given at the inception of the lease are amortized  over the life of
the lease.

ITEM 3.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Partnership's management,  with the
participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Managing  General  Partner,  who are the equivalent of the  Partnership's
principal executive officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  has
evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)  under the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end
of the period covered by this report.  Based on such  evaluation,  the principal
executive  officer  and  principal  financial  officer of the  Managing  General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and principal  financial officer,  respectively,  have concluded that, as of the
end of such period,  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls and procedures are
effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial  Reporting.  There have not been any changes
in the Partnership's  internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules  13a-15(f)  and  15d-15(f)  under the Exchange  Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have  materially  affected,  or
are reasonably likely to materially affect,  the Partnership's  internal control
over financial reporting.



<PAGE>


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking  dismissal
of the action.  In lieu of responding  to the motion,  the  plaintiffs  filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint, which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order  sustaining  defendants'  demurrer on certain  grounds.  On July 20, 2001,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001,
Plaintiffs  filed a fourth amended class and  derivative  action  complaint.  On
September 12, 2001, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.  On
October 5, 2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated  defendants filed a
demurrer to the fourth amended complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001.
On February 2, 2002,  the Court served its order  granting in part the demurrer.
The Court dismissed without leave to amend certain of the plaintiffs' claims. On
February 11, 2002, plaintiffs filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class
comprised  of all  non-affiliated  persons  who own or have  owned  units in the
partnerships. The Managing General Partner and affiliated defendants opposed the
motion.  On April 29, 2002, the Court held a hearing on  plaintiffs'  motion for
class certification and took the matter under submission after further briefing,
as ordered by the court,  was  submitted by the parties.  On July 10, 2002,  the
Court  entered an order  vacating the trial date of January 13, 2003 (as well as
the pre-trial and discovery  cut-off  dates) and stayed the case in its entirety
through  November  7, 2002 so that the  parties  could  have an  opportunity  to
discuss  settlement.  On October 30, 2002, the court entered an order  extending
the stay in effect through January 10, 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first  amended  complaint.  The  Heller  action  was  brought  as a  purported
derivative  action,  and  asserted  claims for,  among other  things,  breach of
fiduciary duty, unfair competition,  conversion, unjust enrichment, and judicial
dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a motion to consolidate  the
Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that the Heller action was filed
in order to preserve the derivative  claims that were dismissed without leave to
amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated July 10, 2001. On October 5,
2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated defendants moved to strike the
first amended  complaint in its entirety for violating the Court's July 10, 2001
order  granting in part and denying in part  defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes
action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of the complaint based on
the  statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the action  demurred to the
fourth amended complaint, and, alternatively,  moved to strike the complaint. On
December 11, 2001,  the court heard argument on the motions and took the matters
under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court  served  notice of its order
granting defendants' motion to strike the Heller complaint as a violation of its
July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On March 27,  2002,  the  plaintiffs
filed a notice  appealing the order  striking the complaint.  Before  completing
briefing on the appeal, the parties stayed further  proceedings in the appeal in
light of a settlement.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action described below.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the Managing General Partner has also agreed to make
a tender offer to purchase all of the partnership  interests in the Partnerships
within one year of final  approval,  if it is granted,  and to provide  partners
with the  independent  appraisals  at the time of these  tenders.  The  proposed
settlement  also provided for the  limitation  of the allowable  costs which the
Managing  General  Partner or its  affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships  in
connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class counsel fees and
costs in this litigation.  On April 11, 2003,  notice was distributed to limited
partners providing the details of the proposed settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a) Exhibits:

                  3.4   Agreement  of  Limited   Partnership,   incorporated  by
                        reference  to  Exhibit  A  to  the   Prospectus  of  the
                        Registrant  dated November 5, 1982, as revised  December
                        30,  1982,  and  after  supplemented,  contained  in the
                        Registrant's  Registration  Statement on Form S-11 (Reg.
                        No. 2-78495).

                  31.1  Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer
                        pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-
                        14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                  31.2  Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer
                        pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-
                        14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                  32.1  Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
                        Adopted  Pursuant to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
                        Act of 2002.

            b)  Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended June 30, 2003.


<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES


In  accordance  with  Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange  Act,  the  Registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.


                                     CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XVIII


                                     By:  FOX PARTNERS
                                          General Partner


                                     By:  FOX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
                                          Managing General Partner


                                     By:  /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                     By:  /s/Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Senior Vice President and
                                          Chief Accounting Officer


                                     Date:August 13, 2003



<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Patrick J. Foye, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Century Properties
      Fund XVIII;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
            to us by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
      on  our  most  recent   evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
      reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit  committee of the
      registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
      functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 13, 2003

                                    /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Patrick J. Foye
                                    Executive  Vice  President  of  Fox  Capital
                                    Management  Corporation,  equivalent  of the
                                    chief executive officer of the Partnership


<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Paul J. McAuliffe, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Century Properties
      Fund XVIII;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
            to us by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
       on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
       reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of the
       registrant's  board of directors (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
       functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 13, 2003

                                  /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                                  Officer of Fox Capital Management Corporation,
                                  equivalent of the chief financial officer of
                                  the Partnership



<PAGE>



Exhibit 32.1


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Century  Properties
Fund XVIII (the "Partnership"),  for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  Patrick J. Foye, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of
the Partnership, and Paul J. McAuliffe, as the equivalent of the chief financial
officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Name:  Patrick J. Foye
                                    Date:  August 13, 2003


                                           /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Name:  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Date:  August 13, 2003


This  certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.