alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24



Power of Attorney

The undersigned hereby appoint Joseph C. Benage as attorney-in-fact, to execute in name and on behalf of the undersigned the Form 10-K Annual Report of LabOne, Inc., to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.

Dated: February 26, 2003

/s/W. Roger Drury
W. Roger Drury, Director

/s/D. Scott Mackesy
D. Scott Mackesy, Director

/s/ John P. Mascotte
John P. Mascotte, Director

/s/ Paul B. Queally
Paul B. Queally, Director

/s/ James R. Seward
James R. Seward, Director

/s/ Sean M. Traynor
Sean M. Traynor, Director

/s/ John E. Walker
John E. Walker, Director
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please

2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated

4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does

5 not include the filing date. 

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 G&C ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, a

8 New Mexico limited liability company;

9 GEORGE CATALOIU, an individual,

10 and CHAD ALADOUD, an individual,

11 Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/

12 Third Party Defendants/Appellees,

13 v. NO. 30,618

14 HEADSTART ENTERPRISES LIMITED

15 PARTNERSHIP, a New Mexico limited

16 partnership; and JAMES P. GUTHRIE, an

17 individual,

18 Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/

19 Third Party Plaintiffs/Appellants.

20 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY

21 Ted C. Baca, District Judge

22 Richard Leverick

23 Albuquerque, NM

24 for Appellees

25 Rammelkamp, Muehlenweg, & Cordova, P.A.

26 Robert J. Muehlenweg

27 Elizabeth A. Heaphy
1 Michelle A. Hironaka

2 Albuquerque, NM

3 for Appellants
3

1 MEMORANDUM OPINION

2 CASTILLO, Chief Judge.

3 Summary affirmance in part and reversal in part was proposed for the reasons

4 stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary

5 affirmance in part and reversal in part has been filed, and the time for doing so has

6 expired.

7 Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

8 IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 __________________________________

10 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge

11 WE CONCUR:

12 __________________________________

13 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

14 __________________________________

15 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**ABDULLAH HANEEF IBN-SADIIKA,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY; DEPT. OF COURT RECORDS; AND KATE**  **BARKMAN, DIRECTOR OF DEPT. OF COURT RECORDS,** 

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 98 WM 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 5th day of February, 2016, the Application for Leave to File** 

**Original Process is** GRANTED **, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or**

**Extraordinary Relief is** DENIED

.

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideratio n or decision of this** 

**matter.**
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 24


                             POWER OF ATTORNEY

            Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended
                             December 31, 2001


The  undersigned  directors of the following  companies (each  respectively  the
"Company")
           Company                              State of Incorporation

  AEP Generating Company                               Ohio
  Appalachian Power Company                          Virginia
  Central Power and Light Company                     Texas
  Columbus Southern Power Company                      Ohio
  Kentucky Power Company                             Kentucky
  Ohio Power Company                                   Ohio
  Public Service Company of Oklahoma                 Oklahoma
  Southwestern Electric Power Company                Delaware
  West Texas Utilities Company                        Texas

do hereby constitute and appoint E. LINN DRAPER,  JR., ARMANDO A. PENA and SUSAN
TOMASKY,  and each of them, their  attorneys-in-fact  and agents, to execute for
them,  and in their names,  and in any and all of their  capacities,  the Annual
Report of the  Company on Form 10-K,  pursuant  to Section 13 of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934,  for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2001, and any and
all  amendments  thereto,  and to file the same,  with all exhibits  thereto and
other  documents  in  connection  therewith,  with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission,  granting unto said  attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them,
full power and  authority  to do and  perform  every act and thing  required  or
necessary to be done,  as fully to all intents and  purposes as the  undersigned
might or could do in  person,  hereby  ratifying  and  confirming  all that said
attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  or any of them,  may  lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned  have signed these presents this 21st
day of February, 2002.


   /s/ E. Linn Draper, Jr.           /s/ Thomas V. Shockley, III


   /s/ Henry W. Fayne                /s/ Susan Tomasky


   /s/ Armando A. Pena               /s/ J. H. Vipperman


   /s/ Robert P. Powers
#### LOGAN HILLS CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. ANNA M. KELLER AND ANOTHER, APPELLANTS, AND BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG, ETC., AND ANOTHER, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued February 11, 1952

Decided February 20, 1952.

Before Judges Jacobs, Eastwood and Bigelow.

*Mr. Milford Salny*argued the cause for the respondent.

*170
      *Mr. Herman G. Vorburger*argued the cause for the appellants *(Mr. Edward F. Smith, Jr.,*attorney).

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Freund, which is reported at 14 *N. J. Super.*219 (1951).
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.709 Transmission lines: Record keeping. Each operator shall maintain the following records for transmission lines for the periods specified: ( a ) The date, location, and description of each repair made to pipe (including pipe-to-pipe connections) must be retained for as long as the pipe remains in service.
( b ) The date, location, and description of each repair made to parts of the pipeline system other than pipe must be retained for at least 5 years. However, repairs generated by patrols, surveys, inspections, or tests required by subparts L and M of this part must be retained in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) A record of each patrol, survey, inspection, and test required by subparts L and M of this part must be retained for at least 5 years or until the next patrol, survey, inspection, or test is completed, whichever is longer.
[Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28786, June 6, 1996]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 28, 1995 (88), Para 88.23 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1057]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.88.23  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the motion of Mr. WISE that the Committee do now rise.

It was decided in the

Yeas

179

negative

Nays

236
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 192

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

#### § 192.101 Scope.

This subpart prescribes the minimum requirements for the design of pipe.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 6, 1995 (110), Para 110.10 Recess--1:31 P.M.]
[Page 1302]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.110.10  recess--1:31 p.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, pursuant to clause 12 of rule I, 
declared the House in recess at 1 o'clock and 31 minutes a.m., until 4 
p.m.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: wewhites@wowway.com [mailto:wewhites@wowway.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:21 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lisa White 

923 Woodcrest 

Royal Oak, MI 48067
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-116891 and 333-174898) of Multi-Fineline Electronix, Inc. of our report dated November 14, 2011 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedulesand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Multi-Fineline Electronix, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2011 filed November 14, 2011. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Orange County,California 

November 28, 2011
-----Original Message----- 

From: pamoemail-public@yahoo.com [mailto:pamoemail-public@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:17 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Pamela Oriard 

956 Risa Rd 

Lafayette, CA 94549
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

FEB 27 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

DERRAL SCHRODER, a De Jure People

for the Freely Associated Compact States

of our Union, a Non-citizen of the De

Facto Federal Government of D.C.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

COLORADO; REGISTERED VOTING

CITIZENS OF THE FEDERAL

GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF

COLUMBIA; CITIZENS OF THE

CORPORATE FEDERAL

GOVERNMENT, that vote for their

rulers,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-1320

(D.C. No. 96-K-1018)

(District of Colorado)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO, Circuit Judge, and MURPHY, Circuit

Judge.
- 2 -

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

Claiming to be “a People for the Freely Associated Compact States of Our Union,

that has pledged his Life, fortune and Sacred Honor to forcing the Government

Employees to recognize and respect [his] true character as a People of the Almighty

Creator,” Derral Schroder appeals the dismissal of his complaint by the district court. Mr.

Schroder had brought an almost indecipherable action naming as defendants: “People of

the State of Colorado, Registered Voting citizens of the Federal Government of the

District of Columbia, Citizens of the Corporate Federal Government, [sic] that Vote for

their Rulers.” The district court, sua sponte, dismissed the action on the ground the

complaint failed to name any suable entity. We agree and AFFIRM.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge
# EUR-Lex - 52004AP0052 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52004AP0052

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Andorra providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments (COM(2004)0564 — C6-0120/2004 — 2004/0192(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 201 E , 18/08/2005 P. 0062 - 0063 *

P6_TA(2004)0052

Taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments (Andorra) *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Andorra providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments (COM(2004)0564 — C6-0120/2004 — 2004/0192(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2004)0564) [1],

- having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Andorra providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC of 3 June 2003 on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments,

- having regard to Article 94 and Article 300(2), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0120/2004),

- having regard to Rules 51 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A6-0017/2004),

1. Approves the conclusion of the agreement;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Principality of Andorra.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Robert R. Jones, III, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Bancorporation of Alabama, Inc.(the “Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this            quarterly report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report basedon such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting;5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 10, 2006       /s/ Robert R. Jones, III Robert R. Jones, III    Interim Principal Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2061 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 155
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2061

                          [Report No. 104-412]

 To designate the Federal building located at 1550 Dewey Avenue, Baker 
      City, Oregon, as the ``David J. Wheeler Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 1995

  Mr. Cooley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

            December 18 (legislative day, December 15), 1995

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the Federal building located at 1550 Dewey Avenue, Baker 
      City, Oregon, as the ``David J. Wheeler Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 1550 Dewey Avenue, Baker City, 
Oregon, shall be known and designated as the ``David J. Wheeler Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``David J. Wheeler 
Federal Building''.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 155

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2061

                          [Report No. 104-412]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the Federal building located at 1550 Dewey Avenue, Baker 
      City, Oregon, as the ``David J. Wheeler Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

            December 18 (legislative day, December 15), 1995

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, August 4, 1995 (109), Para 109.26 Permission to File Report]
[Page 1293]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.109.26  permission to file report

  On motion of Mr. GOODLING, by unanimous consent, the Committee on 
Economic and Educational Opportunities was granted permission until 12 
o'clock noon on Friday, September 1, 1995, to file a report on the bill 
(H.R. 1594) to place restrictions on the promotion by the Department of 
Labor of economically targeted investments in connection with employee 
benefit plans.
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 198

To amend title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 to permit the conversion

of wetlands that are one acre or less in size.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. SMITH of Michigan (for himself, Mr. HANCOCK, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr.

BAKER of Louisiana, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. HAYES, Mr. STENHOLM, and

Mr. DORNAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 to

permit the conversion of wetlands that are one acre

or less in size.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Down To Earth Tiny

5 Wetland Act of 1995.’’

6 SEC. 2. CONVERSION OF WETLANDS THAT ARE ONE ACRE

7 OR LESS IN SIZE.

8 Section. 1222(b)(2) of the Food Security Act of 1985

9 (16 U.S.C. 3882(b)(2)) is amended—
2

HR 198 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph

2 (A);

3 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub4 paragraph (B) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and

5 (3) by adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(C) a wetland that is one acre or less in

7 size as determined by the Secretary, except that

8 the Secretary shall make a reasonable effort to

9 make an on-site wetland inspection whenever

10 requested by an owner or operator.’’.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7769

CLAIBORNE DOOLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

V. SMITH, M.D.; W. P. ROGERS, Regional Director; A. DAVID ROBINSON, Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CA-97-28)

Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 20, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claiborne Dooley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under

28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly,

we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Dooley v. Smith, No. CA-97-28 (E.D. Va. Nov. 18, 1997). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED