alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Development of Chemical Precipitation Purchased Equipment 

Costs: Clarifiers 

 

 

This telephone contact report supports EPA’s development of purchased equipment cost equations for clarifiers 

by documenting EPA's communication with a vendor regarding purchase costs for solids contact clarifiers used 

in the Steam Electric cost model. 
Project No.: 0172.08.029.044 DISTRIBUTION 

Page _1_ of __1_

Project Name: Steam/Cost/Compliance Modeling 

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD 

 Outgoing Call

Date: 04/12/2011 Time: 12:00 pm EST 

Company Name: Siemens 

 

Contact Name: Thomas Dumbaugh 

Phone No.:(515)-268-8549 

Email address: thomas.dumbaugh@siemens.com

Name: Kavya Kasturi ERG

GENERAL SUBJECT: Vendor cost request for Solids contact clarifiers for a chemical precipitation wastewater treatment system. 

 

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN 

On April 12, 2011 at 12:00 pm I contacted Mr. Thomas Dumbaugh. I explained to Mr. Dumbaugh that we are 

working on conceptual level costing of a chemical precipitation wastewater treatment system to treat FGD (flue

gas desulfurization) wastewater from steam electric power plants, and as a part of this project we are trying to 

collect cost information on different components or units of a chemical precipitation system. 

I told Mr. Dumbaugh that we would like to obtain purchase costs (including ancillary equipment), power 

requirements and any available marketing material or brochures for solids contact clarifiers for flow rates 

ranging from 7 gpm to 700 gpm. I explained to Mr. Dumbaugh the general set up of the chemical precipitation 

system as well as the characteristics of the FGD wastewater. I specifically stated that the chlorides levels could 

range from 2,000 ppm to 40,000 ppm. 

Mr. Dumbaugh indicated that the smallest size solids contact clarifier would accommodate a flow rate of 100 

gpm. For flow rates under 100 gpm, Mr. Dumbaugh suggested using plastic tanks with a mixer. 

Mr. Dumbaugh provided costs for a range of flow rates. He indicated the costs included all internal equipment 

but did not include the cost of the basin. He said a concrete basin is typically used. The costs also do not include 

installation, which is typically two to three times the purchase cost. Also, Mr. Dumbaugh stated that the costs 

are for all steel equipment, which would accommodate our lower chlorides level of 2,000 ppm but would not be 

appropriate for higher chlorides levels. Mr. Dumbaugh indicated he would provide a multiplier that could be 

applied to the costs to account for using a material appropriate for the chlorides range we expect. 

The costs for the clarifiers are provided below: 

Flow (gpm) Diameter (ft) Cost ($) 

100 12 $118,000 

140 14 $122,000 

250 18 $130,000 

350 22 $150,000 

470 26 $162,000 

550 28 $168,000 

700 32 $185,000 

 

Mr. Dumbaugh stated no other ancillary equipment was required. Additionally, he stated that the power 

requirements were based on the motor starters. The mixer drive would range from 2 hp for the smallest unit to 5 

hp for the largest unit. The scraper drive would be 0.25 hp for the largest unit.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew I. Sealfon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed the Form 10-QSB of Repro-Med Systems, Inc. (the "Report");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: January 22, 2007

/s/ Andrew I. Sealfon
----------------------------
Andrew I. Sealfon
Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO 
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           8,973
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  161,272
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,495
<INVENTORY>                                      1,707
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,316
<PP&E>                                       1,521,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                 731,585
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 993,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          262,221
<BONDS>                                        247,735
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       191,968
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,240
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   993,742
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               597,013
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  496,644
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 80,990
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,198
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             48,792
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          286
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,078
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1334

PERRY BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND; DEPUTY PATRICK H. HANDY,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

JOHN DOE,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:07-cv-01956-PJM)

Submitted: January 8, 2010 Decided: January 22, 2010

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Perry Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Corlie McCormick, Jr., David Reid Moore, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

23 PER CURIAM:

Perry Brown appeals the district court’s final order

of judgment entered after a jury returned a defense verdict in

Brown’s civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Brown v. Maryland
,
No. 8:07-cv-01956-PJM (D. Md. Feb. 23, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Mitchell D. Staples, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Bancorporationof Alabama, Inc. (the “Registrant”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this quarterly report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on suchevaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting;
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the audit
 

 

committee of the Registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: November 15, 2004    /s/ Mitchell D. Staples   Mitchell D. Staples Principal Accounting Officer
-----Original Message----- 

From: SheffieldLn@aol.com [mailto:SheffieldLn@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:27 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Gregory Graff 

1722 Beulah Ave 

Pueblo, CO 81004
#### § 218.11 Filing, testing, and instruction.

The operating rules prescribed in this part, and any additional or more stringent requirements issued by a railroad in relation to the operating rules prescribed in this part, shall be subject to the provisions of part 217 of this chapter, Railroad Operating Rules: Filing, Testing, and Instruction.
From: roberthodge4477@msn.com [mailto:roberthodge4477@msn.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:25 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Robert Hodge 

3735 NE Cleveland Ave 

Portland, OR 97212
#### Taylor *v.*Thompson.

jn a su^ against the maker of a promissory note, originally secured by mortgage of real estate, by an indorsee who has been compelled to purchase the note to protect a mortgage taken by him upon the same premises from a subsequent owner without notice of the prior mortgage, it is no defence that an action for breach of covenant, by reason of the prior mortgage, has been commenced by the plaintiff against his mortgagor and settled by taking a worthless note.

Assumpsit, to recover the amount of the defendant’s promissory note. A referee found for the plaintiff, subject to the opinion of the court, upon the following facts: June 5, 1870, James R. Thurston hired $350 of the plaintiff, giving as security a mortgage of his homestead with the usual covenants of warranty. The homestead was then in fact subject to a prior mortgage, given by this defendant to Elias Towle to secure the note now in suit. The plaintiff, afterwards learning of the Towle mortgage, took it up to prevent its foreclosure, Towle assigning the mortgage and indorsing the note to the plaintiff without recourse. Soon after the plaintiff *157called on Thurston in regard to it, who said he knew nothing of it, and refused to pay it or do anything about it. Thurston being unable to redeem the premises, and not having paid any part of the $350 loan, gave the plaintiff a quitclaim deed of the premises. Some years after this the plaintiff brought an action against. Thurston for breach of covenant, by reason of the Towle mortgage, which was entered and afterwards settled by the giving of a worthless note by Thurston to the plaintiff, and at the October term, 1879, the action was entered “neither party.” The Towle note and mortgage were not surrendered by the plaintiff, nor embraced in the settlement. This action is brought to recover the amount-due on the Towle mortgage note. The court ordered judgment on, the report for the plaintiff, and the defendant excepted.

*J. H. JTobbs,*for the defendant.

*S. Q. Dearborn, L. D. Sawyer,*and *S. D. Quarles,*for the plaintiff.

Clark, J.

It is contended that the plaintiff, by bringing an action of covenant broken against Thurston, based on the incumbrance of the Towle mortgage, and settling it by taking Thurston’s, worthless note, on which he has received nothing, is barred from maintaining this action. It is a sufficient answer to this claim, that the note in suit was not included in the settlement of that action, and there is no suggestion either that the note has ever been paid by the defendant, or by any one for him, or that the defendant ought not to pay it, or that the plaintiff is not a *bona fide*holder of it.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Editorial Note on Part 190
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 190 appear at 78 FR 58908, Sept. 25, 2013.

§ 190.343 Information made available to the public and request for protection of confidential commercial information. When you submit information to PHMSA during a rulemaking proceeding, as part of your application for special permit or renewal, or for any other reason, we may make that information publicly available unless you ask that we keep the information confidential. ( a ) *Asking for protection of confidential commercial information.* You may ask us to give confidential treatment to information you give to the agency by taking the following steps: ( 1 ) Mark “confidential” on each page of the original document you would like to keep confidential.
( 2 ) Send us, along with the original document, a second copy of the original document with the confidential commercial information deleted.
( 3 ) Explain why the information you are submitting is confidential commercial information.
( b ) *PHMSA decision.* PHMSA will treat as confidential the information that you submitted in accordance with this section, unless we notify you otherwise. If PHMSA decides to disclose the information, PHMSA will review your request to protect confidential commercial information under the criteria set forth in the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, including following the consultation procedures set out in the Departmental FOIA regulations, 49 CFR 7.29. If PHMSA decides to disclose the information over your objections, we will notify you in writing at least five business days before the intended disclosure date.
[Amdt. 190-19, 82 FR 7995, Jan. 23, 2017]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, June 29, 1995 (89), Para 89.25 After Recess--8:15 P.M.]
[Page 1084]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.89.25  after recess--8:15 p.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. WALKER, called the House to order.
```
Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allegiant Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shaun R. Hayes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|August 14, 2003 | ALLEGIANT BANCORP, INC.
By:/s/ Shaun R. Hayes
             Shaun R. Hayes, President and
                 Chief Executive Officer
|--------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message----- 

From: foster@rockisland.com [mailto:foster@rockisland.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:58 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Anne Foster 

127 Lopez Rd. 

Lopez, WA 98261
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          42,609
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,667,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  9,205,613
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,293,145
<PP&E>                                      16,962,525
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,972,863
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,350,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,654,240
<BONDS>                                     15,339,585
<COMMON>                                       394,777
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,962,250
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,350,852
<SALES>                                     19,552,782
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,552,782
<CGS>                                       15,701,339
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,701,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             599,177
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (205,018)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (205,018)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (205,018)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>