UNITED STATES
               SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                      WASHINGTON, DC  20549

                            FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
[X]  ANNUAL  REPORT  PURSUANT  TO SECTION  13  OR  15(D)  OF  THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended        December 31, 2000
                          ---------------------------------------

[   ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)  OF  THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to _______________

Commission file number                  33-19811
                       ------------------------------------------

                DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
-----------------------------------------------------------------
     (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

      Pennsylvania                                     23-2492210
-------------------------------                        ----------
(State or other jurisdiction of                 (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                 Identification No.)

       1521  LOCUST  STREET,   PHILADELPHIA, PA  19102
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)       (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (215)557-9800
                                                   --------------

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
                                                            ----

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: 25,461 Units
                                                            --------------
             UNITS OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST
-----------------------------------------------------------------
                        (Title of Class)

Indicate  by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed  all
reports  required  to be filed by Section  13  or  15(d)  of  the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding  12  months
(or  for such shorter period that the registrant was required  to
file  such  reports),  and (2) has been subject  to  such  filing
requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   X     No
                                          -----      -----

Indicate  by  check  mark  if  disclosure  of  delinquent  filers
pursuant  to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained  herein,
and  will not be contained to the best of registrant's knowledge,
in  definitive  proxy or information statements  incorporated  by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to  this
Form 10-K. [ ]

Aggregate  market  value of Units held by non-affiliates  of  the
Registrant: Not Applicable*
            ---------------

*  Securities  not quoted in any trading market  to  Registrant's
knowledge.

<PAGE>

                                PART I

Item 1.      Business

          a. General Development of Business

              Diversified  Historic Investors VI ("Registrant")  is  a
limited  partnership  formed in 1988 under Pennsylvania  law.   As  of
December 31, 2000, Registrant had outstanding 25,461 units of  limited
partnership interest (the "Units").

              Registrant  is  presently in its  operating  stage.   It
originally  owned eight properties or interests therein.  Interest  in
two  properties have been lost through foreclosure, one of  which  was
foreclosed in March 1997, and an interest in a third property has been
reduced  substantially.   See Item 2. Properties,  for  a  description
thereof.   For  a discussion of the operations of the Registrant,  see
Part  II.  Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis  of  Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.

              The  following is a summary of significant  transactions
involving the Registrant's interests:

          b. Financial Information about Industry Segments

             The Registrant operates in one industry segment.

          c. Narrative Description of Business

              Registrant  is  in  the business of operating,  holding,
selling,  exchanging and otherwise dealing in and with real properties
containing improvements which are "Certified Historic Structures,"  as
such  term  is defined in the Internal Revenue Code (the  "Code"),  or
which  are  eligible for designation as such, for use  as  apartments,
offices, hotels and commercial spaces, or any combination thereof,  or
low income housing eligible for the tax credit provided by Section  42
of  the  Code, and such other uses as the Registrant's general partner
may deem appropriate.

              Since  the  Registrant's inception, all  the  properties
acquired  either by the Registrant, or the subsidiary partnerships  in
which  it  has  an interest, have been rehabilitated and certified  as
historic  structures  and  have received the  related  investment  tax
credit.   In  addition,  four  properties (Roseland,  Mater  Dolorosa,
Strehlow  Terrace  and  Saunders Apartments)  are  low-income  housing
structures  which  qualify for, have received, and  will  continue  to
receive, the low income tax credits.  Each of the properties currently
owned  are held for rental operations.  At this time it is anticipated
that all the properties will continue to be held for this purpose.  At
such  time as real property values begin to increase to a point  where
they  can  be  sold  at  a  price which is  sufficient  to  repay  the
underlying   indebtedness,  the  Registrant   will   re-evaluate   its
investment strategy regarding the properties.

             Strehlow Terrace Apartments was foreclosed by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development, the guarantor of the
first mortgage, on April 30, 2002.

              On  June 30, 2002, the Registrant sold its investment in
Saunders  Apartments for $25,000.  The proceeds of the sale were  used
to pay accrued expenses of the Registrant.

              As  of December 31, 2000, Registrant owned interests  in
six   properties,   located  in  Nebraska  (three),  Virginia   (one),
Pennsylvania  (one),  and Louisiana (one).  In total,  the  properties
contain  100  apartment units, 149 condominium units  used  as  rental
units,  and 44,115 square feet ("sf") of commercial/retail space.   As
of  December 31, 2000, 213 of the apartment and condominium units were
under lease (86%) at monthly rental rates ranging from $246 to $1,550.
In  addition,  44,115 sf of commercial/retail space  was  under  lease
(100%) at annual rates ranging from $7.12 to $24.14 per sf.  Rental of
the  apartments and commercial space is not expected to  be  seasonal.
For a further discussion of the properties, see Item 2. Properties.

              The Registrant is affected by and subject to the general
competitive  conditions of the residential and commercial real  estate
industry.   As  a  result of the overbuilding  that  occurred  in  the
1980's, the competition for both residential and commercial tenants in
the  local  markets where the Registrant's properties are  located  is
generally  strong.  In each of the markets, there are several  similar
historically certified rehabilitated buildings.  Two of the properties
held  for  rental  are  market-rate  properties  and  are  located  in
Alexandria,  Virginia,  and  Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania.   At   these
properties   the  Registrant  is  forced  to  keep  its  rent   levels
competitively  low  in order to maintain moderate  to  high  occupancy
levels.  Management of each of these properties makes frequent  market
analyses in order to set rent levels.  When occupancy nears the 97-99%
range,  management considers raising the rents by more than  a  normal
cost  of  living  increase. If occupancy falls below  85%,  management
considers lowering rents.  Four of the properties held for rental  are
low-income  housing  structures located in Omaha,  Nebraska,  and  New
Orleans, Louisiana.  These properties have fixed rental rates and face
competition for low to moderate income tenants from other  low  income
properties in the area.  However, there is no organization which holds
a  dominant position in the residential housing or commercial  leasing
market  in  any  of  the  geographic areas in which  the  Registrant's
properties are located.

             Registrant has no employees.  Registrant's activities are
overseen  by  Brandywine Construction & Management, Inc.  ("BCMI"),  a
real estate management firm.

            d.   Financial  Information  About  Foreign  and  Domestic
Operations and Export Sales

             See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Item 2.      Properties

           As of December 31, 2000, Registrant owned interests in five
partnerships that each owns one property and a minority interest in an
additional  partnership that owns one property.  A summary description
of each property is given below.

           a.  Firehouse Square - consists of 31,431 sf of  commercial
space  at  902-910 King Street in Alexandria, Virginia.   In  December
1988, Registrant was admitted, with a 90% general partner interest, to
Firehouse  Square  General Partnership ("FSGP"),  a  Virginia  general
partnership,  for  a  cash capital contribution of  $1,750,000.   FSGP
acquired  and  rehabilitated the property for $5,660,000 ($151.51  per
sf), funded by the equity contribution and a mortgage note payable  of
$4,207,000.   On June 1, 1993, the first mortgage was  modified.   The
terms  of  the modification included the addition of all  accrued  and
unpaid  interest ($218,728) to the principal balance and  revision  of
the  payment terms.  The lender also advanced $40,711 for real  estate
taxes  and  $33,627  for  tenant improvements.   Monthly  payments  of
interest to the new note holder were to be made in an amount equal  to
net  operating income.  The note accrued interest at prime plus  1/2%.
On  November  16, 1994, the new first mortgage holder foreclosed  upon
its  mortgage.  By "credit bidding" its mortgage, the mortgage  holder
became the successful bidder at sale.  The first mortgage holder  sold
its  successful  bid  to  a  partnership  known  as  901  King  Street
Associates  ("KSA").  KSA is a general partnership owned  90%  by  the
Registrant.  The selling price of the mortgage was the amount that the
mortgage  had  been immediately prior to foreclosure.  The  obligation
has  terms  materially the same as the original mortgage loan  and  is
secured by a new mortgage on the property.  Therefore, after the sale,
the   Registrant's  interest  in  the  property  was  unchanged.   The
principal balance of the mortgage at December 31, 1997 was $4,304,188.
The  note accrued interest at prime plus 1/2% and the entire principal
balance was due October 1998.  In June 1995, the Registrant refinanced
$900,000 of the first mortgage. This loan bore interest at 9.75%,  was
payable  in monthly installments of principal and interest  of  $8,021
and  was  due  in  June 2005.  In November 1998, both  mortgages  were
refinanced.   The  first  mortgage was refinanced  with  a  $1,937,000
mortgage (principal balance of $1,880,725 at December 31, 2000)  which
bears  interest  at  7.08%,  is payable  in  monthly  installments  of
principal  and interest of $13,789 and is due in November  2008.   The
second  mortgage was refinanced with a $4,330,107 mortgage  (principal
balance  of  $4,367,913  at December 31, 2000, including  accrued  but
unpaid  interest) which bears interest at 7%, is due in December  2008
with monthly payments of interest to be made in an amount equal to net
operating income.  Proceeds from the refinancing of the first mortgage
were used to reduce the second mortgage principal.

              The  property  is managed by BCMI.  As of  December  31,
2000,  all 31,431 sf of space were under lease (100%) at annual  rates
ranging  from $7.34 to $21.53 per sf.  The occupancy for the  previous
four years was 100% for 1999,100% for 1998, 94% for 1997, and 82%  for
1996.  The average annual rent was $7.12 to $20.89 for 1999,1998,  and
1997,  and $7.00 to $20.55 for 1996. There are three tenants who  each
occupy  ten  percent  or more of the rentable  square  footage.   They
operate  principally  as  a  law firm, an  architectural  firm  and  a
computer  company.  All leases are operating leases  and  the  minimum
future  rentals on the non-cancelable leases as of December  31,  2000
are $939,371.

              The  following  is  a  table  showing  commercial  lease
expirations at Firehouse Square for the next five years.



                                         Total annual
            Number of   Total sf of     rental covered       % of gross
             leases      expiring        by expiring       annual rental
Year        expiring      leases           leases          from property

 2001          1              2,574       $ 44,716              9%
 2002          4             11,023       $211,233             42%
 2003          5             14,063       $235,640             47%
 2004          0                  0              0              0%
 2005          0                  0              0              0%

             For tax purposes, this property has a basis of $3,680,448
and  is depreciated using the straight-line method with a useful  life
of  39  years.  The annual real estate taxes are $37,296.  It  is  the
opinion  of  the  management of the Registrant that  the  property  is
adequately covered by insurance.

          b. Roseland - consists of 17 low-income apartments and 3,000
sf of retail space at 4932 South 24th Street in South Omaha, Nebraska.
In  July  1988,  Registrant was admitted with a  98%  general  partner
interest  and  a 1% limited partner interest to Roseland Redevelopment
Partners  ("RRP"), a Nebraska limited partnership, for a cash  capital
contribution of $700,000.  RRP acquired and rehabilitated the property
for  $1,680,000 ($70.29 per sf), funded by the equity contribution and
three  notes  payable.  The first note payable  of  $500,000  is  non-
interest  bearing  with principal due upon sale of the  property;  the
second  note payable of $63,313 bears interest at 9.16%, with interest
adjusting every three years based on the three-year Treasury Bill rate
plus  250  basis  points,  is payable in semi-annual  installments  of
principal  and  interest  of  $4,856  and  is  due  in  November  2001
(principal  balance at December 31, 2000 of $8,784).  The  third  note
payable  of  $370,000 (principal balance of $331,957 at  December  31,
2000)  bears  interest  at 8%, is payable in monthly  installments  of
principal and interest of $3,083 and is due in August 2006.

              The  property  is  managed by  an  independent  property
management  firm.  On December 31, 2000, 10 of the units  were  leased
(59%)  at  monthly  rents of $300 to $475 and 3,000 sf  of  commercial
space  (100%) was leased at annual rents ranging from $3.00  to  $8.00
per  sf.  All residential leases are renewable, one-year leases.   The
occupancy  for the residential units for the previous four  years  was
80%  for  1999,  82% for 1998, 92% for 1997, and 88%  for  1996.   The
monthly rental range has been approximately the same since 1995.   The
commercial  space has been 100% occupied since 1995.   The  range  for
annual  rents  has been $3.13 to $5.00 per sf for 1999 and  1998,  and
$3.13 to $5.50 per sf for 1997.  There is one tenant who occupies  ten
percent  or  more  of  the  rentable square footage.   It  principally
functions  as  a tax counseling provider.  All commercial  leases  are
operating  leases and the minimum future rentals on the  noncancelable
leases  as  of December 31, 2000 are $8,400.  There are no  contingent
liabilities included in income for the years ended December 31,  2000,
1999 and 1998.

              The  following  is  a  table  showing  commercial  lease
expirations at Roseland for the next five years:

                                         Total annual
            Number of   Total sf of     rental covered
             leases      expiring        by expiring        % of gross
Year        expiring      leases           leases          annual rental

 2001          0              0              0                0%
 2002          1            600         $4,800                7%
 2003          0              0              0                0%
 2004          0              0              0                0%
 2005          0              0              0                0%

             For tax purposes, this property has a basis of $1,381,122
and  is depreciated using the straight-line method with a useful  life
of  27.5  years.  The annual real estate taxes are $1,166. It  is  the
opinion  of  the  management of the Registrant that  the  property  is
adequately covered by insurance.

           c.  Mater  Dolorosa Apartments - consists of 68 low  income
apartments  located at 1265 South Carrollton Avenue  in  New  Orleans,
Louisiana.   In July 1988, Registrant was admitted with a 90%  general
partnership interest to Mater Dolorosa General Partnership ("MDGP")  a
Pennsylvania   general  partnership,  for  a  cash   contribution   of
$1,519,000.    MDGP  acquired  and  rehabilitated  the  property   for
$3,149,000  ($59.39 per sf), funded by the equity contribution  and  a
note  payable of $1,790,000.  The note payable bears interest at 8.5%,
is  payable  in  monthly  installments of principal  and  interest  of
$17,627,  and is due in April 2005 (principal balance at December  31,
2000 of $764,501).

              The  property  is managed by a property management  firm
which  is an affiliate of the Registrant's co-general partner of MDGP.
At  December 31, 2000, 68 of the units were rented (100%)  at  monthly
rents  of  $519  to $621.  All leases are renewable, one-year  leases.
The  occupancy for the previous four years was 97% for 1999,  97%  for
1998,  97%  for 1997, and 99% for 1996.  The monthly rental range  was
$486  to $610 in 1999 and had been approximately the same since  1995.
For  tax  purposes,  this property has a basis of  $2,803,265  and  is
depreciated using the straight-line method with a useful life of  27.5
years.   The  annual real estate taxes are $5,520.  There  is  no  one
tenant  who occupies ten percent or more of the building.  It  is  the
opinion  of  the  management of the Registrant that  the  property  is
adequately covered by insurance.

           d.  Strehlow Terrace Apartments - consists of 70 low income
apartment  units  located at 2024 North 16th Street, Omaha,  Nebraska.
In  January  1989, Registrant was admitted with a 98% general  partner
interest to Strehlow Terrace Apartments Limited Partnership ("STALP"),
a  Nebraska  limited partnership, for a cash capital  contribution  of
$2,250,000.   STALP  acquired  and  rehabilitated  the  property   for
$5,817,000 ($52.02 per sf) funded by the equity contribution and three
mortgage  loans.   The first loan, financed through  the  Governmental
National  Mortgage  Association ("GNMA") is for $1,789,000  (principal
balance  at  December 31, 2000 of $1,775,053), bears interest  at  10-
1/4%, is payable in monthly installments of principal and interest  of
$15,540,  and is due in 2030.  In August 1993, six units were  damaged
by  a  fire  at  Strehlow Terrace.  Due to the financial  difficulties
caused  by the fire, STALP fell behind on its monthly debt service  by
several  months.   Although  the  property  was  able  to  reduce  the
arrearage by 50% and commenced regular, monthly payments by May  1994,
the  loan  was  declared in default and was assigned by  GNMA  to  the
Federal   Housing   Administration/Housing   and   Urban   Development
("FHA/HUD")  on  June  24,  1994.  As of December  31,  2000,  workout
opportunities with HUD continued to be suspended.  The other two loans
were  made  by  the City of Omaha.  One, in the amount of  $1,700,000,
bears interest at 1%, and the other, in the amount of $75,000, is non-
interest bearing.  The principal and applicable interest on both  City
of  Omaha  loans is due upon the sale of the property or in  the  year
2030, whichever is earlier.

              The  property  is  managed by  an  independent  property
management  firm.   On  December 31, 2000, 62 of the  apartments  were
leased  (89%) at monthly rents ranging from $200 to $638.  All  leases
are  renewable, one-year leases.  The occupancy for the previous  four
years  was 98% for 1999, 97% for 1998, 97% for 1997 and 96% for  1996.
The  monthly rental range has been approximately the same since  1995.
For  tax  purposes,  this property has a basis of  $4,833,151  and  is
depreciated using the straight-line method with a useful life of  27.5
years.   The  annual  real  estate taxes are $13,779.  No  one  tenant
occupies  ten percent of more of the building.  It is the  opinion  of
the  management  of  the  Registrant that the property  is  adequately
covered by insurance.

             Strehlow Terrace Apartments was foreclosed by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development, the guarantor of the
first mortgage, on April 30, 2002.

           e.  Canal  House  - consists of 71 residential  condominium
units and 8,341sf of commercial condominium space located at 4250-4312
Main Street, Manayunk, Pennsylvania.  In February 1989, Registrant was
admitted  to  Canal House Historic Associates ("CHHA"), a Pennsylvania
limited  partnership, with a 99% general partner interest for  a  cash
contribution   of  $6,000,000.   During  1990,  Registrant   made   an
additional  cash contribution of $200,000.  The 1% limited partnership
interest  is  also  controlled  by  Registrant;  it  is  held   by   a
Pennsylvania  corporation whose stock is owned  by  Registrant.   CHHA
acquired and rehabilitated the property for $9,700,000 ($94.41 per sf)
which  was  funded by the equity contribution and a loan of $4,000,000
with  interest  at  7.75% and monthly principal and interest  payments
(based  on  a  30-year amortization schedule).  In October  1995,  the
Registrant ceased making debt service payments.  The loan was sold  in
December 1995.  The Registrant entered into an agreement with the  new
holder  of  the note (principal balance of $1,520,117 at December  31,
2000)  whereby the maturity of the loan was extended to December  2000
and monthly payments of interest are to be made to the new note holder
in  an  amount  equal  to net operating income.  In  April  1996,  the
Registrant refinanced $3,216,000 of the first mortgage.  This new loan
was  a first mortgage which bore interest at 8.75%, payable in monthly
installments of principal and interest of $25,300 and was due in April
2003.   In  September  1998, the second mortgage lender  advanced  the
property $3,907,200 to repay the first mortgage with the intention  of
refinancing  the  first  mortgage at  a  lower  interest  rate.   This
refinancing  was completed in January 1999 with a $4,000,000  mortgage
loan which bears interest at 7.22%, is payable in monthly payments  of
principal and interest of $27,206 and is due in January 2009.

             The property is managed by BCMI. At December 31, 2000, 68
of  the  residential units were under lease (96%) at monthly rents  of
$715 to $1,640, and all of the commercial space was under lease (100%)
at annual rents ranging from $22.47 to $23.22 per sf.  All residential
leases   are  renewable,  one-year  leases.  The  occupancy  for   the
residential  units for the previous four years was 93% for  1999,  92%
for  1998,  94% for 1997, and 93% for 1996.  The monthly rental  range
has  been  approximately the same since 1995.  The occupancy  for  the
commercial  space was 100% for 1999, 100% for 1998, 90% for  1997  and
88%  for  1996.   The range for annual rents was $7.12 to  $20.89  for
1999, $19.00 to $24.14 for 1998,  $19.00 to $23.11 per sf for 1997 and
$19.00 to $22.61 per sf for 1996.  There are no tenants who occupy ten
percent  or  more  of  the rentable square footage.   All  leases  are
operating  leases and the minimum future rentals on the  noncancelable
leases as of December 31, 2000 are $348,272.

              The  following  is  a  table  showing  commercial  lease
expirations at Canal House for the next five years.

                                         Total annual
            Number of   Total sf of     rental covered
             leases      expiring        by expiring        % of gross
Year        expiring      leases           leases          annual rental

2001           2          5,065          $206,490             21%
2002           1            850          $ 19,740              2%
2003           0              0                 0              0
2004           0              0                 0              0
2005           1          2,426          $ 55,313              6%


             For tax purposes, this property has a basis of $8,054,494
and  is depreciated using the straight-line method with a useful  life
of  27.5 years.  The annual real estate taxes are $86,984. It  is  the
opinion  of  the  management of the Registrant that  the  property  is
adequately covered by insurance.

           f.    Saunders  Apartments  -  consists  of  23  low-income
apartments  at  415 North 41st Avenue in Omaha, Nebraska.   Registrant
acquired  a  99%  joint venture interest in Saunders Apartments  Joint
Venture  ("SAJV"),  a  Nebraska Joint  Venture,  for  a  cash  capital
contribution  of  $875,000.   SAJV  acquired  and  rehabilitated   the
property  for  $1,815,000  ($79.96  per  sf),  funded  by  the  equity
contribution and a mortgage payable of $675,000.  The note was retired
with  $285,000  advanced from Registrant's co-general  partner  and  a
mortgage  note payable of $395,000 (principal balance at December  31,
2000  of  $266,415).  The mortgage note bears interest at  10.87%,  is
payable in monthly installments of $3,723 and matured in May 1997.  On
June  1,  1993  an  amended and restated joint venture  agreement  was
reached  whereby  the  Registrant's interest  was  reduced  to  a  30%
interest.

              The  property  is  managed by  an  independent  property
management  firm.  As of December 31, 2000, 22 units were under  lease
(96%) with rents ranging from $385 to $430.  All leases are renewable,
one-year  leases.  The occupancy for the previous four years was  100%
for  1999, 100% for 1998, 93% for 1997 and 87% for 1996.  The  monthly
rental  range  has been approximately the same since  1995.   For  tax
purposes,  this property has a basis of $2,010,482 and is  depreciated
using the straight-line method with a useful life of 27.5 years.   The
annual  real  estate  taxes are $8,025. No  one  tenant  occupies  ten
percent  or more of the building.  It is the opinion of the management
of   the  Registrant  that  the  property  is  adequately  covered  by
insurance.

              On  June 30, 2002, the Registrant sold its investment in
Saunders  Apartments for $25,000.  The proceeds of the sale were  used
to pay accrued expenses of the Registrant.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

          a. To the best of its knowledge, Registrant is not party to,
nor  are  any  of its properties the subject of, any pending  material
legal proceedings.

Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

          No  matter was submitted during the fiscal years covered  by
this report to a vote of security holders.

<PAGE>

                                PART II

Item   5.     Market  for  Registrant's  Common  Equity  and   Related
Stockholder Matters

          a.  There  is no established public trading market  for  the
Units.   Registrant does not anticipate any such market will  develop.
Trading in the units occurs solely through private transactions.   The
Registrant  is  not  aware  of  the  prices  at  which  trades  occur.
Registrant's records indicate that 210 units were sold or exchanged of
record in 2000.

          b.  As of December 31, 2000, there were 2,825 record holders
of Units.

          c. Registrant did not declare any cash dividends in 2000  or
1999.


Item 6.   Selected Financial Data

         The  following selected financial data are for the five years
ended December 31, 2000.  This data should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.  This
data is not covered by the independent auditors' report.

                     2000        1999        1998        1997        1996
                     ----        ----        ----        ----        ----
Rental income  $ 2,452,664 $ 2,373,232 $ 2,295,927 $ 2,332,312 $ 2,622,418
Interest income      6,966       3,677       2,783         949       1,229
Net loss         1,338,104   1,650,894   2,447,292   2,016,133   2,114,935
Net loss
 per Unit            52.03       64.84       95.16       78.40       82.24
Total assets (net
 of depre-
 ciation and
 amortization)  14,905,759  17,740,808  18,878,736  19,709,306  25,557,744
Debt
 obligations    16,857,962  17,077,741  17,161,190  15,451,686  19,353,961

Note:  See Part II, Item 7.3 Results of Operations for a discussion of
factors which materially affect the comparability of the information
reflected in the above table.


Item 7.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of
          Financial Condition and Results of Operations

          (1)  Liquidity

              At  December 31, 2000, Registrant had total unrestricted
cash of $46,215.  Cash generated from operations is used primarily  to
fund  operating expenses and debt service.  If cash flow proves to  be
insufficient,   the   Registrant  will  attempt  to   negotiate   loan
modifications with the various lenders in order to remain  current  on
all  obligations.   The  Registrant is not  aware  of  any  additional
sources of liquidity.

              As  of December 31, 2000, Registrant had restricted cash
of  $365,806 consisting primarily of funds held as security  deposits,
replacement  reserves  and  escrows for taxes  and  insurance.   As  a
consequence of these restrictions as to use, Registrant does not  deem
these funds to be a source of liquidity.

              In  recent years the Registrant has realized significant
losses,  including the foreclosure of two properties and a substantial
reduction  of interest in a third property.  At the present time,  the
remaining  properties with the exception of Strehlow are able  to  pay
their  operating expenses and debt service including two  of  the  six
properties where the mortgages are cash-flow mortgages, requiring  all
available cash after payment of operating expenses to be paid  to  the
first  mortgage holder.  None of the properties is currently producing
a material amount of revenues in excess of operating expenses and debt
service.  Therefore, it is unlikely that any cash will be available to
the Registrant to pay its general and administrative expenses.

              It is the Registrant's intention to continue to hold the
properties until they can no longer meet the debt service requirements
and  the  properties  are  foreclosed, or  the  market  value  of  the
properties  increases to a point where they can be  sold  at  a  price
which  is  sufficient to repay the underlying indebtedness  (principal
plus accrued interest).

             Strehlow Terrace Apartments was foreclosed by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development, the guarantor of the
first mortgage, on April 30, 2002.

              On  June 30, 2002, the Registrant sold its investment in
Saunders  Apartments for $25,000.  The proceeds of the sale were  used
to pay accrued expenses of the Registrant.

          (2)  Capital Resources

             Any capital expenditures needed are generally replacement
items  and  are  funded  out  of cash from operations  or  replacement
reserves,  if  any.  The Registrant is not aware of any factors  which
would   cause  historical  capital  expenditures  levels  not  to   be
indicative of capital requirements in the future and accordingly, does
not  believe that it will have to commit material resources to capital
investments for the foreseeable future.

          (3)  Results of Operations

             During 2000, Registrant incurred a net loss of $1,338,104
($52.03  per  limited partnership unit) compared  to  a  net  loss  of
$1,650,894  ($64.84 per limited partnership unit) in 1999  and  a  net
loss of $2,447,292 ($95.16 per limited partnership unit) in 1998.

              Rental  income  increased from  $2,295,927  in  1998  to
$2,373,232 in 1999, and to $2,445,698 in 2000.  The increase from 1999
to  2000 is due to an increase in average occupancy at Canal House and
Mater Dolorosa, partially offset by a decrease in average occupancy at
Roseland and Strehlow. The increase from 1998 to 1999 is the result of
an increase at Canal House, Firehouse Square, and Strehlow Terrace due
to an increase in average occupancy, partially offset by a decrease at
Roseland due to a decrease in average occupancy.

              Rental  operations expense increased from $1,076,819  in
1998  to  $1,123,015 in 1999, and to $1,192,754 in 2000.  The increase
from  1999 to 2000 is due increases in accounting fees and commissions
expense  at Canal House, wages and salaries expense at Mater  Dolorosa
and  Strehlow, maintenance expense at Firehouse Square, and  insurance
expense at Strehlow. The increase is partially offset by a decrease in
maintenance expense at Strehlow. The increase from 1998 to 1999  is  a
result  of  an  increase in maintenance expense  at  Canal  House  and
Strehlow  Terrace  and an increase in wages and  salaries  expense  at
Roseland,  partially  offset by a decrease in maintenance  expense  at
Mater Dolorosa.

              Interest  expense decreased from $2,189,165 in  1998  to
$1,411,077 in 1999, and to $1,398,919 in 2000.  The decrease from 1999
to 2000 is due to a decrease in principal balance on which interest is
calculated. The decrease from 1998 to 1999 and the increase from  1997
to 1998 are primarily due to nonrecurring prepayment penalties paid in
conjunction  with refinancing the first mortgages at the  Canal  House
and Firehouse Square in 1998.

              Depreciation  and  amortization expense  increased  from
$1,211,249  in 1998 to $1,229,432 in 1999 and decreased to  $1,178,867
in  2000.  The decrease from 1999 to 2000 is due to the write  off  of
previous of loan costs due to a refinance at Canal House in 1999.  The
increase  from 1998 to 1999 is due to the increase in amortization  at
Canal  House  partially  offset  by a decrease  at  Firehouse  Square.
Amortization  expense increased at Canal House due to the amortization
of  loan  costs  incurred in the 1999 refinancing.   The  decrease  in
amortization  expense at Firehouse Square is due to the  write-off  of
leasing commissions for tenants who vacated in 1998.

               In   2000,  losses  of  $1,227,000  were  incurred   at
Registrant's properties compared to a loss of $ 1,301,000 in 1999  and
$2,101,000  in  1998.   A discussion of property operations/activities
follows:

              In  2000,  Registrant  incurred a  loss  of  $79,000  at
Roseland including $70,000 of depreciation expense compared to a  loss
of  $77,000  including $71,000 of depreciation expense in 1999  and  a
loss  of  $52,000 including $68,000 of depreciation expense  in  1998.
Since  Roseland is a low income housing property, rents are  fixed  in
relation  to specified income levels.  As a result, similar  to  Mater
Dolorosa   and   Strehlow  Terrace  discussed  below,   the   property
experiences high occupancy levels but rental income remains low.   The
increase in the loss from 1999 to 2000 is due to a decrease in  rental
income and an increase in maintenance expense, partially offset  by  a
decrease  in  legal  and  accounting expense and  wages  and  salaries
expense.  The  increase in the loss from 1998 to  1999  is  due  to  a
decrease  in rental income and an increase in wages, partially  offset
by  a decrease in interest expense.  The decrease in rental income  is
due  to  a  decrease in average occupancy. Wages and salaries  expense
increased  due  to a change in management company that  increased  the
maintenance staff at the property.  Interest expense decreased due  to
the amortization of the principal balance.

              In  2000,  Registrant incurred a  loss  of  $499,000  at
Firehouse  Square including $268,000 of depreciation and  amortization
expense  compared  to  a  loss  of  $480,000  including  $261,000   of
depreciation and amortization expense in 1999 and a loss  of  $839,000
including $328,000 of depreciation and amortization expense  in  1998.
The  increase  in  loss from 1999 to 2000 is due  to  an  increase  in
maintenance  expense  and utilities expense, partially  offset  by  an
increase  in  rental and interest income . The increase in maintenance
expense is due to an increase in maintenance service and plumbing  and
electrical  expense. The increase in utilities expense is  due  to  an
increase in electricity charges. The increase in rental income is  due
to  an  increase  in  average occupancy and the increase  in  interest
income  is  due to interest earned on a lender reserve  account.   The
decrease in the loss from 1998 to 1999 is due to an increase in rental
income  and  a  decrease in interest and amortization expense.  Rental
income  increased due to an increase in average rental rates. Interest
expense  decreased  due to nonrecurring prepayment penalties  paid  in
1998  in conjunction with the refinancing of the first mortgage.   The
decrease in amortization expense is a result of the write-off in  1998
of leasing commissions for tenants who vacated in 1998.

             In 2000, Registrant recognized income of $21,000 at Mater
Dolorosa including depreciation expense of $126,000 compared to income
of  $9,000  including depreciation expense of $127,000 in 1999  and  a
loss  of  $26,000 including depreciation expense of $127,000 in  1998.
Since Mater Dolorosa is a low income housing property, rents are fixed
in  relation  to  specified income levels.  As a  result,  similar  to
Roseland and Strehlow Terrace, the property experiences high occupancy
levels  but  rental income remains low.  The increase in  income  from
1999  to 2000 is due to an increase in rental income, partially offset
by an increase in operating expenses. The increase in rental income is
due  to an increase in monthly rental rates. The increase in operating
expenses  is  due to an increase in utilities expense  and  wages  and
salaries  expense,  partially  offset by  a  decrease  in  maintenance
expense and real estate tax expense. The recognition of income in 1999
versus a loss in 1998 is due to a decrease in maintenance and interest
expense.  Maintenance  expense decreased due to  deferred  maintenance
performed at the property in 1998.  Interest expense decreased due  to
a decrease in the principal balance of the mortgage loan.

              In  2000,  Registrant incurred a  loss  of  $325,000  at
Strehlow   Terrace  Apartments,  including  $240,000  of  depreciation
expense  compared  to  a  loss  of  $306,000  including  $239,000   of
depreciation expense in 1999 and a loss of $270,000 including $237,000
of  depreciation  expense in 1998.  Since Strehlow  is  a  low  income
housing  property,  rents are fixed in relation  to  specified  income
levels.   As  a  result,  similar  to  Registrant's  other  low-income
properties, the property experiences high occupancy levels but  rental
income remains low.  The increase in loss from 1999 to 2000 is due  to
a decrease in rental income and an increase in operating expenses. The
decrease  in  rental income is due to a decrease in average  occupancy
and  the  increase  in operating expenses is due  to  an  increase  in
insurance  expense.   The  increase in insurance  expense  is  due  to
insurance  market conditions.  The increase in the loss from  1998  to
1999  is  the  result of an increase in maintenance expense  partially
offset  by  a decrease in interest expense and an increase  in  rental
income. The increase in maintenance expense is due to repairs made  to
the  heating  and air conditioning system. Interest expense  decreased
due  to a decrease in the principal balance of the mortgage loan.  The
increase in rental income is due to an increase in average occupancy.

               Strehlow  Terrace  Apartments  was  foreclosed  by  the
Department  of  Housing and Urban Development, the  guarantor  of  the
first mortgage, on April 30, 2002.

              In 1999, Registrant incurred a loss of $344,000 at Canal
House,  including  $396,000 of depreciation and  amortization  expense
compared to a loss of $447,000 including depreciation and amortization
expense  of  $455,000  in  1999  and  a  loss  of  $914,000  including
depreciation  and  amortization expense  of  $374,000  in  1998.   The
decrease  in  loss from 1999 to 2000 is due to an increase  in  rental
income and a decrease in amortization expense, partially offset by  an
increase in operating expenses. The increase in rental income  is  due
to  an  increase in average occupancy and the decrease in amortization
expense  is  due to the full amoritzation of loan costs in  1999.  The
increase  in  operating expenses is due to an increase in  commissions
expense  and  accounting  expense, due  to  the  payment  of  past-due
accounting fees. The decrease in the loss from 1998 to 1999 is due  to
an  increase  in  rental income combined with a decrease  in  interest
expense  partially offset by increases in maintenance and amortization
expenses.   The  increase in rental income is due to  an  increase  in
average  occupancy.   Interest expense decreased due  to  nonrecurring
prepayment penalties paid in conjunction with the refinancing  of  the
first  mortgage  in  1999. Maintenance expense increased  due  to  the
higher  turnover  of apartment units.  Amortization expense  increased
due to the amortization of loan costs incurred in the refinancing.

              On  June 30, 2002, the Registrant sold its investment in
Saunders  Apartments for $25,000.  The proceeds of the sale were  used
to pay accrued expenses of the Registrant.


             Summary of Equity Method Investments

              In  2000,  Registrant  incurred a  loss  of  $20,000  at
Saunders Apartments compared to a loss of $19,000 in 1999 and  a  loss
of  $15,000 in 1998.  The increase in loss from 1999 to 2000 is due to
an  increase  in  maintenance  expense. The  increase  in  maintenance
expense is due to an increase in cleaning service and repairs expense.
The  increase in the loss from 1998 to 1999 is due to an  increase  in
maintenance expense as a result of painting and repair of  door  locks
and heating units at the property.

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
         About Market Risk

           All  of our assets and liabilities are denominated in  U.S.
dollars, and as a result, we do not have exposure to currency exchange
risks.

           We  do  not  engage in any interest rate, foreign  currency
exchange  rate  or  commodity price-hedging  transactions,  and  as  a
result, we do not have exposure to derivatives risk.

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

          Registrant  is  not  required to furnish  the  supplementary
financial information referred to in Item 302 of Regulations  S-K.

<PAGE>



                     Independent Auditor's Report

To the Partners of Diversified Historic Investors VI


We  have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheet  of
Diversified Historic Investors VI (a Pennsylvania limited partnership)
and  subsidiaries  as of December 31, 2000 and 1999  and  the  related
statements  of operations, changes in partners' equity and cash  flows
for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2000,  1999  and  1998.   These
consolidated  financial  statements  are  the  responsibility  of  the
Partnership's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on  these  financial statements based on our audit.  We did not  audit
the  financial  statements  of  Strehlow  Terrace  Apartments  Limited
Partnership,  which reflect total assets of $3,336,607 and  $3,571,480
as  of  December 31, 2000 and 1999 and total revenues of $364,615  and
$367,606, respectively, for the years then ended.  In addition, we did
not   audit  the  financial  statements  of  Mater  Dolorosa   General
Partnership  which reflect assets of $1,625,365 and $1,740,784  as  of
December  31,  2000  and  1999  and total  revenues  of  $429,229  and
$417,626,  respectively, for the years then ended.   Those  statements
were  audited  by other auditors whose reports have been furnished  to
us,  and  our  opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts  included
Strehlow  Terrace  Apartments Limited Partnership and  Mater  Dolorosa
General  Partnership,  is based solely on the  reports  of  the  other
auditors.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted  in  the  United States of America.  These standards  require
that  we  plan  and  perform the audit to obtain reasonable  assurance
about  whether  the  consolidated financial  statements  are  free  of
material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test  basis,
evidence  supporting the amounts and disclosures in  the  consolidated
financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as  well
as  evaluating  the  overall  financial  statement  presentation.   We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors,
the  consolidated  financial  statements  referred  to  above  present
fairly,   in   all  material  respects,  the  financial  position   of
Diversified  Historic Investors VI as of December 31, 2000  and  1999,
and  the  results  of operations and cash flows for  the  years  ended
December  31,  2000,  1999  and  1998 in  conformity  with  accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our  audits  were made for the purpose of forming an  opinion  on  the
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.  The  Schedule  of
Real  Estate and Accumulated Depreciation on page 35 is presented  for
the  purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the
basic  financial statements.  Such information has been  subjected  to
the  auditing  procedures  applied in the audit  of  the  consolidated
financial statements and, in our opinion, which insofar as it  relates
to  Strehlow Terrace Apartments Limited Partnership and Mater Dolorosa
General  Partnership  is based on the report of other  auditors,  such
information  is fairly stated in all material respects in relation  to
the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that
the  partnership will continue as a going concern.  In  recent  years,
the partnership has incurred significant losses from operations, which
raise  substantial  doubt about its ability to  continue  as  a  going
concern.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.




Gross, Kreger & Passio, L.L.C.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
August 1, 2001

<PAGE>


                    Independent Auditor's Report

To the Partners of
Strehlow Terrace Apartments Limited Partnership

We  have  audited the accompanying balance sheets of Strehlow  Terrace
Apartments Limited Partnership, (a Nebraska limited partnership),  FHA
Project  No.  103-94006, as of December 31, 2000  and  1999,  and  the
related  statements of operations, partners' deficit, and  cash  flows
for  the  years  then  ended.   These  financial  statements  are  the
responsibility of the Partnership's management.  Our responsibility is
to  express  an  opinion on these financial statements  based  on  our
audits.

We   conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  auditing  standards
generally  accepted  in  the  United  States  of  America,  Government
Auditing  Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of  the  United
States,  and  the Consolidated Audit Guide for Audits of HUD  Programs
(the Guide) issued by the Department of Housing and Urban Development,
Office  of  the  Inspector General.  Those standards  and  that  guide
require  that  we  plan  and perform the audit  to  obtain  reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of  material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis,  evidence
supporting  the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated  financial
statements.    An   audit  also  includes  assessing  the   accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as  well
as  evaluating  the  overall  financial  statement  presentation.   We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In  our  opinion, the financial statements referred to  above  present
fairly,  in all material respects, the financial position of  Strehlow
Terrace Apartments Limited Partnership at December 31, 2000 and  1999,
and  the  results of its operations, changes in partners' deficit  and
cash  flows  for  the years then ended, in conformity  with  generally
accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that
the  Partnership  will continue as a going concern.  As  discussed  in
Note  F  to  the  financial statements, the Partnership  has  incurred
significant  losses  since its formation to operate  Strehlow  Terrace
Apartments  beginning  in  1990.  The Partnership  has  experienced  a
deficiency  in  cash  flows resulting in past due mortgage  principal,
interest  and  escrow  payments.  In addition, work-out  opportunities
with  the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) have  been
suspended.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability
to continue as a going concern.  Management's plans in regard to these
matters are also described in Note F.  The financial statements do not
include  any  adjustments that might result from the outcome  of  this
uncertainty.

In  accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the Consolidated
Audit  Guide for Audits of HUD Programs, we have also issued a  report
dated  February  16,  2001 on our consideration of  the  Partnership's
internal control structure and reports dated February 16, 2001 on  its
compliance  with specific requirements applicable to Fair Housing  and
Non-discrimination, and specific requirements applicable to its  major
HUD program and its non-major HUD program transactions.

Our  audits  were made for the purpose of forming an  opinion  on  the
financial  statements taken as a whole.  The supplementary information
is  presented  for the purposes of additional analysis and  is  not  a
required part of the basic financial statements.  Such information has
been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the
basic  financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly  stated  in
all  material  respects in relation to the basic financial  statements
taken as a whole.

Blackman & Associates, P.C.
Omaha, Nebraska
February 16, 2001

<PAGE>



                     Independent Auditor's Report

To the Partners of
Mater Dolorosa General Partnership

We  have  audited  the accompanying balance sheets of  Mater  Dolorosa
General  Partnership, for December 31, 2000 and 1999 and  the  related
statements  of  operations, partners' equity and cash  flows  for  the
years  then  ended.  These financial statements are the responsibility
of  the partnership's management.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion  on  these  consolidated financial  statements  based  on  our
audits.

We   conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  auditing  standards
generally  accepted in the United States of America.  Those  standards
require  that  we  plan  and perform the audits to  obtain  reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of  material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis,  evidence
supporting  the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated  financial
statements.    An   audit  also  includes  assessing  the   accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as  well
as  evaluating  the  overall  financial  statement  presentation.   We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In  our  opinion, the financial statements referred to  above  present
fairly,  in  all  material respects, the financial position  of  Mater
Dolorosa General Partnership as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then  ended
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.
Metairie, Louisiana
February 19, 2001

<PAGE>


                   DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                        (a limited partnership)

              INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
              ------------------------------------------

                   AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
                   ---------------------------------


Consolidated financial statements:                               Page

     Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2000 and 1999    21

     Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years
      Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998                      22

     Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' Equity
      for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998        23

     Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years
      Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998                      24

     Notes to consolidated financial statements                 25-32


Financial statement schedules:

     Schedule XI - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation       34

     Notes to Schedule XI                                         35



All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the
required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements
or notes thereto.

<PAGE>

                   DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                        (a limited partnership)

                      CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                      ---------------------------
                      December 31, 2000 and 1999

                                Assets

                                            2000         1999
                                            ----         ----
Rental properties at cost:
 Land                                  $   950,238  $   950,238
 Buildings and improvements             27,373,551   27,176,327
 Furniture and fixtures                    776,142      883,523
                                       -----------  -----------
                                        29,099,931   29,010,088
     Less - accumulated depreciation   (13,243,935) (12,134,403)
                                       -----------  -----------
                                        15,855,996   16,875,685
Cash and cash equivalents                   46,215       40,599
Restricted cash                            365,806      365,632
Investment in affiliate                    (48,006)     (27,778)
Other assets (net of accumulated
 amortization of $751,489
 and $682,154)                             426,782      486,670
                                       -----------  -----------
         Total                         $16,646,793  $17,740,808
                                       ===========  ===========


                 Liabilities and Partners' Equity
Liabilities:
 Debt obligations                      $16,857,962  $17,077,741
 Accounts payable:
  Trade                                  1,321,939    1,323,177
  Taxes                                     20,465       18,797
  Related parties                          446,202      416,509
  Other                                     10,824       51,107
 Interest payable                        1,618,641    1,175,479
 Tenant security deposits                  168,550      137,684
                                       -----------  -----------
         Total liabilities              20,444,583   20,200,494
Partners' deficit                       (3,797,790)  (2,459,686)
                                       -----------  -----------
         Total                         $16,646,793  $17,740,808
                                       ===========  ===========


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

<PAGE>


                   DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                        (a limited partnership)

                 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                 -------------------------------------

         For the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998

                                 2000          1999          1998
                                 ----          ----          ----

Revenues:
 Rental income               $2,445,698    $2,373,232    $2,295,927
 Other income                         0        10,670             0
 Interest income                  6,966         3,677         2,783
                             ----------    ----------    ----------
         Total revenues       2,452,664     2,387,579     2,298,710
                             ----------    ----------    ----------
Costs and expenses:
 Rental operations            1,192,754     1,123,015     1,076,819
 General and administrative           0       256,142       254,050
 Interest                     1,398,919     1,411,077     2,189,165
 Depreciation and
  amortization                1,178,867     1,229,432     1,211,249
                             ----------    ----------    ----------
         Total costs and
          expenses            3,770,540     4,019,666     4,731,283
                             ----------    ----------    ----------
Loss before equity
 in affiliate                (1,317,876)   (1,632,087)   (2,432,573)
Equity in net loss
 of affiliate                   (20,228)      (18,807)      (14,719)
                             ----------    ----------    ----------
Net loss                    ($1,338,104)  ($1,650,894)  ($2,447,292)
                             ==========    ==========    ==========

Net loss per limited
 partnership unit:
 Loss before equity in
  affiliate                 ($    51.24)  ($    63.46)  ($    94.59)
 Equity in net loss of
  affiliate                       (0.79)        (0.73)        (0.57)
                             ----------    ----------    ----------
                            ($    52.03)  ($    64.19)  ($    95.16)
                             ==========    ==========    ==========


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

<PAGE>


                   DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                        (a limited partnership)

         CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' EQUITY
         -----------------------------------------------------

         For the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998



                                      Dover
                                    Historic     Limited
                                    Advisors     Partners
                                     VI (1)        (2)         Total
                                    --------     --------      -----
Percentage participation in
 profit or loss                       1%           99%          100%
                                      ==           ===          ====

Balance at December 31, 1996      ($174,113)   $3,828,746    $3,654,633
Net loss                            (20,161)   (1,995,972)   (2,016,133)
                                   --------    ----------    ----------
Balance at December 31, 1997       (194,274)    1,832,774     1,638,500
Net loss                            (24,473)   (2,422,819)   (2,447,292)
                                   --------    ----------    ----------
Balance at December 31, 1998       (218,747)     (590,045)     (808,792)
Net loss                            (16,509)   (1,634,385)   (1,650,894)
                                   --------    ----------    ----------
Balance at December 31, 1999       (235,256)   (2,224,430)   (2,459,686)
Net loss                            (13,381)   (1,324,723)   (1,338,104)
                                   --------    ----------    ----------
Balance at December 31, 2000      ($248,637)  ($3,549,153)  ($3,797,790)
                                   ========    ==========    ==========


 (1) General Partner.

 (2)  25,461  limited partnership units outstanding at December 31,
       2000, 1999, and 1998.


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

<PAGE>


                   DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                        (a limited partnership)

                 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                 -------------------------------------

         For the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998

                                         2000        1999         1998
                                         ----        ----         ----
Cash flows from operating
 activities:
 Net loss                           ($1,338,104)($1,650,894)($ 2,447,292)
 Adjustments to reconcile net
  loss to net cash provided by
  (used in)operating activities:
  Depreciation and amortization       1,178,867   1,229,432    1,211,249
  Equity in loss of affiliate            20,228      18,807       14,719
 Changes in assets and liabilities:
  (Increase) decrease in
   restricted cash                         (175)    (84,734)      53,284
  (Increase) decrease in other assets    (9,447)     12,374     (394,075)
  (Decrease) increase in accounts
   payable - trade                       (1,237)    241,400      209,152
  Increase (decrease) in accounts
   payable - taxes                        1,668      (1,695)         488
  Increase in accounts payable -
   related party                         29,693      19,980       88,055
  (Decrease) increase in accounts
   payable - other                      (40,283)     24,068       26,013
  Increase (decrease) in interest
   payable                              443,163     304,836     (421,998)
  Increase in tenant security deposits   30,866       7,826        5,508
                                     ----------  ----------  -----------
  Net cash provided by (used
   in) operating activities             315,239     121,400   (1,654,897)
                                     ----------  ----------  -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
 Capital improvements                   (89,844)    (25,416)     (49,579)
                                     ----------  ----------  -----------
Net cash used in investing activities   (89,844)    (25,416)     (49,579)
                                     ----------  ----------  -----------
Cash flows from financing activities:
 Proceeds from debt financing                 0      25,416   10,200,066
  Principal payments                   (219,779)   (108,865)  (8,490,562)
                                     ----------  ----------  -----------
Net cash (used in) provided
 by financing activities               (219,779)    (83,449)   1,709,504
                                     ----------  ----------  -----------
Increase in cash and cash equivalents     5,616      12,535        5,028
Cash and cash equivalents at
 beginning of year                       40,599      28,064       23,036
                                     ----------  ----------  -----------
Cash and cash equivalents at end
 of year                             $   46,215  $   40,599  $    28,064
                                     ==========  ==========  ===========

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow
 Information:
  Cash paid during the year
   for interest                      $1,398,919  $1,106,241   $1,106,280


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

<PAGE>

                   DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                        (a limited partnership)

              NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE A - ORGANIZATION

Diversified  Historic  Investors  VI (the  "Partnership"),  a  limited
partnership,  was  formed  in January 1988 to  acquire,  rehabilitate,
renovate, manage, operate, hold, sell, exchange, and otherwise deal in
and  with real properties containing improvements which are "certified
historic structures" as defined in the Internal Revenue Code  of  1986
(the  "Code"),  or which are eligible for the tax credit  provided  by
Section 42 of the Code, and such other uses as Dover Historic Advisors
VI (the "General Partner") deems appropriate, and to engage in any and
all   activities   related  or  incidental  thereto.   Rehabilitations
undertaken  by  the  Partnership were done with a  view  to  obtaining
certification  of  expenditures therefor as "qualified  rehabilitation
expenditures" as defined in the Code.

NOTE B - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A  summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied
in   the   preparation  of  the  accompanying  consolidated  financial
statements follows:

1.   Principles of Consolidation

The  accompanying  financial statements include the  accounts  of  the
Partnership and five subsidiary partnerships ("Ventures") in which the
Partnership has controlling interests, with appropriate elimination of
inter-partnership  transactions  and  balances.   In   addition,   the
Partnership owns a minority interest of 30% in one partnership,  which
it  accounts for on the equity method.  Allocations of income and loss
to  the  minority owners of the Ventures will be made until and unless
the  cumulative losses applicable to the minority interests exceed the
minority  interests  in  the equity capital of  the  Ventures.   These
financial  statements  reflect  all adjustments  (consisting  only  of
normal   recurring  adjustments)  which,  in  the   opinion   of   the
Partnership's General partner, are necessary for a fair  statement  of
the results for those years.

2.   Depreciation

Depreciation  is  computed  using the straight-line  method  over  the
estimated useful lives of the assets.  Buildings and improvements  are
depreciated over 25 years and furniture and fixtures over five years.

3.   Net Loss Per Partnership Unit

The  net  loss  per limited partnership unit is based on the  weighted
average number of limited partnership units outstanding (25,461  units
in 2000, 1999 and 1998).
3.   Costs of Issuance

Costs  incurred  in connection with the offering and sale  of  limited
partnership units were charged against partners' equity as incurred.

4.   Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Partnership considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with
a maturity of less than three months to be cash equivalents.

5.   Income Taxes

Income  taxes or credits resulting from earnings or losses are payable
by  or  accrue  to  the  benefits  of the  partners;  accordingly,  no
provision   has  been  made  for  income  taxes  in  these   financial
statements.

6.   Restricted Cash

Restricted cash includes amounts held for tenant security deposits and
real estate tax reserves.

7.   Revenue Recognition

Revenues  are recognized when rental payments are due on  a  straight-
line  basis.   Rental payments received in advance are deferred  until
earned.

8.   Rental Properties

Rental  properties are stated at cost.  A provision for impairment  of
value  is  recorded  when  a decline in the value  of  a  property  is
determined  to be other than temporary as a result of one or  more  of
the following: (1) a property is offered for sale at a price below its
current  carrying  value,  (2)  a  property  has  significant  balloon
payments due within the foreseeable future which the Partnership  does
not  have the resources to meet, and anticipates it will be unable  to
obtain replacement financing or debt modification sufficient to  allow
it  to continue to hold the property over a reasonable period of time,
(3)  a  property  has  been, and is expected to  continue,  generating
significant  operating  deficits and  the  Partnership  is  unable  or
unwilling to sustain such deficit results of operations, and has  been
unable  to,  or  anticipates  it  will  be  unable  to,  obtain   debt
modification,  financing  or refinancing sufficient  to  allow  it  to
continue to hold the property for a reasonable period of time or,  (4)
a  property's  value  has declined based on management's  expectations
with respect to projected future operational cash flows and prevailing
economic  conditions.   An  impairment  loss  is  indicated  when  the
undiscounted  sum  of  estimated future  cash  flows  from  an  asset,
including  estimated sales proceeds, and assuming a reasonable  period
of  ownership up to 5 years, is less than the carrying amount  of  the
asset.  The impairment loss is measured as the difference between  the
estimated  fair  value and the carrying amount of the  asset.  In  the
absence  of  the above circumstances, properties and improvements  are
stated at cost.  An analysis is done on an annual basis at December 31
of each year.

9.   Use of Estimates

The  preparation  of  the  financial  statements  in  conformity  with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management  to  make
estimates  and  assumptions that affect the amounts  reported  in  the
financial  statements  and accompanying notes.  Actual  results  could
differ from those estimates.

NOTE C - LEASES

The  Partnership's  leases with commercial tenants are  classified  as
operating leases.  Leases are generally for a period of three to  five
years and provide for a fixed base rent plus contingent rents based on
level of sales and sharing of certain operating costs.

Minimum  future commercial rentals on operating leases as of December
31, 2000 are as follows:
                 2001              $606,258
                 2002               458,856
                 2003               144,169
                 2004                55,313
                 2005                23,047


NOTE D - PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

The significant terms of the amended and restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership  (the  "Agreement"),  as  they  relate  to  the  financial
statements, follow:

1.   Capital Contributions

The  partnership offered investors limited partnership units at $1,000
per  unit; the minimum purchase per investor was three units.  A total
of  25,461 limited partnership units was sold.  After payment of costs
of issuance as provided for in the Agreement and the withdrawal of the
initial  limited partner, initial partnership capital net of costs  of
issuance  was  $22,181,070 from limited partners and $9,900  from  the
General Partner.

2.   Distributions from Operations

The  Agreement provides that, beginning with the date of the admission
of  subscribers  as  limited  partners, all  distributable  cash  from
operations  (as  defined)  will  be distributed  99%  to  the  limited
partners  and  1%  to  the General Partner.   After  cash  flows  from
operations are positive, the General Partner shall also receive 4%  of
such cash flows exclusive of interest earned on investments.

All  distributable cash from sales or dispositions will be distributed
to  the limited partners up to their adjusted invested capital plus an
amount  equal  to  the sum of the greater of an 8.5% cumulative,  non-
compounded annual return on the average after-credit invested  capital
or  a  6%  cumulative,  non-compounded annual return  on  the  average
adjusted  invested  capital, plus an early  investor  incentive,  less
amounts  previously  distributed; thereafter,  after  receipt  by  the
General  Partner  or  its affiliates of any accrued  but  unpaid  real
estate  brokerage commissions, the balance will be distributed 85%  to
the  limited  partners  and 15% to the General  Partner.   Terms  used
throughout this paragraph are as defined under the Agreement.

3.   Allocation of Net Income and Net Losses from Operations

Net  income  and net loss (as defined) will be allocated  99%  to  the
limited partners and 1% to the General Partner with certain exceptions
as defined in the Agreement.

The Agreement provides that the fiscal year of the Partnership will be
the  calendar  year  and  that the Partnership  shall  continue  until
December  31,  2038, unless sooner terminated upon the  occurrence  of
certain events.

NOTE E - ACQUISITIONS

The  Partnership  acquired one property and five  general  or  limited
partnership  interests in Ventures during the period from  January  7,
1988  to  December  1988, and one general and one limited  partnership
interest in Ventures in 1989, as discussed below.

In July 1988, the Partnership was admitted, with a 98% general partner
and  a  1% limited partner interest, to a Nebraska limited partnership
which  owns  a building located in Omaha, Nebraska, consisting  of  17
apartment  units,  for a cash capital contribution  of  $700,000.   In
addition,  $128,284 in acquisition costs relating  to  the  investment
were capitalized as part of buildings and improvements.

In July 1988, the Partnership was admitted, with a 90% general partner
interest,  to  a Louisiana general partnership which owns  a  building
located  in New Orleans, Louisiana, consisting of 68 apartment  units,
for  a cash capital contribution of $1,519,000.  In addition, $241,173
of  acquisition  costs relating to the investment were capitalized  as
part  of  buildings  and  improvements.   During  1990,  as  permanent
financing  was  obtained,  $60,000 of  the  capital  contribution  was
returned to the Partnership.

In  December  1988,  the  Partnership acquired  a  99%  joint  venture
interest in a Nebraska joint venture which owns a building located  in
Omaha,  Nebraska, consisting of 23 apartment units, for a cash capital
contribution of $875,000.  In addition, $153,940 in acquisition  costs
relating  to the investment were capitalized as part of buildings  and
improvements.   These  capitalized costs have been  removed  from  the
balance  sheet.  Pursuant to the June 1993 Amended and Restated  Joint
Venture Agreement, the Partnership's interest was reduced to 30%.

In  December  1988, the Partnership was admitted, with a  97%  general
partner  and a 1% limited partner interest, to a West Virginia limited
partnership  which  owned  a  building  located  in  Huntington,  West
Virginia, consisting of 53 apartment units and 41,590 square  feet  of
commercial  space, for a general partner cash capital contribution  of
$1,470,000  and limited partner cash capital contribution of  $10,000.
In  addition, $492,609 of acquisition costs relating to the investment
were  capitalized  as part of building and improvements.   The  lender
foreclosed on the property in October 1994.

In  December  1988, the Partnership was admitted, with a  90%  general
partner  interest,  to  a Virginia general partnership  which  owns  a
building located in Alexandria, Virginia, consisting of 32,544  square
feet  of  commercial  space,  for  a  cash  capital  contribution   of
$1,750,000.   In addition, $436,164 in acquisition costs  relating  to
the  investment  have  been  capitalized  as  part  of  buildings  and
improvements.   In  1990,  the Partnership  made  an  additional  cash
contribution of $196,621 pursuant to an agreement with the  co-general
partner.

In  December 1988, the Partnership purchased 78 condominium units  and
6,700  square  feet of commercial space located in North Carolina  for
$5,042,000.   In addition, $774,258 of acquisition costs  relating  to
the  property  were capitalized as part of buildings and improvements.
On  January  21, 1994, the property was transferred to a  Pennsylvania
limited partnership in which the partnership owns a 99% interest.   On
March  14,  1997, the Registrant was declared in default on the  first
mortgage  for failure to make the minimum monthly payment.   On  March
31,  1997,  a settlement agreement was reached whereby the  Registrant
has  agreed  to  relinquish its partnership interests in  the  limited
partnership in lieu of foreclosure.

In  January  1989, the Partnership was admitted, with  a  98%  general
partner  interest,  to  a Nebraska general partnership  which  owns  a
building  located  in  Omaha, Nebraska, consisting  of  70  apartments
units,  for  a cash capital contribution of $2,250,000.  In  addition,
$448,993  of  acquisition  costs  relating  to  the  investment   were
capitalized as part of buildings and improvements.

In  February  1989, the Partnership was admitted, with a  99%  general
partner interest, to a Pennsylvania limited partnership which  owns  a
building located in Manayunk, Pennsylvania, consisting of 73 apartment
units  and  8,471 square feet of commercial space, for  a  total  cash
capital  contribution  of  $6,000,000, less funds  advanced  prior  to
admittance  ($2,431,552 at December 31, 1988).  In addition,  $664,509
of  acquisition  costs relating to the investment were capitalized  as
part  of  buildings and improvements.  The building  was  subsequently
converted  to a condominium, with the Partnership retaining  title  to
all  property.   During  1990, the Partnership  made  additional  cash
contributions of $220,000.

NOTE F - DEBT OBLIGATIONS

Debt obligations were as follows:                     December 31,
                                                   2000          1999
                                                   ----          ----
Note   payable,   non-interest   bearing;    $   500,000   $   500,000
principal  due  upon  sale  of  property;
collateralized    by    related    rental
property.

Note payable, interest at 7.75% and 9.16%          8,784        20,312
at  December 31, 2000 and 1999,  adjusted
every  three years, based upon the three-
year  Treasury Bill rate plus  250  basis
points,     payable    in     semi-annual
installments of principal and interest of
$4,856  (payment adjusted  in  accordance
with  interest  rate  changes);  due   in
November 2001; collateralized by  related
rental property.

Note   payable,  interest  at  7.75%   at        331,957       339,990
December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively;
payable   in   monthly  installments   of
principal and interest of $3,083; due  in
August  2006; collateralized  by  related
rental property.

Note  payable, interest at 8.5%;  payable        764,501       904,511
in  monthly installments of principal and
interest  of $17,627; due in April  2005;
collateralized    by    related    rental
property.

Mortgage  loan, interest accrues  at  7%;      4,367,913     4,367,913
interest  only  payable  monthly  to  the
extent  of net operating income;  due  in
December  2008;  collateralized  by   the
related rental property

Mortgage loan, interest at 7.08%; payable      1,880,725     1,909,678
in  monthly installments of principal and
interest  of  $21,471;  due  in  November
2008;   collateralized  by  the   related
rental property.

Note  payable, non-interest bearing;  due         75,000        75,000
upon sale of property; collateralized  by
related rental property.

Note payable, interest at 10.25%; payable      1,775,053     1,775,053
in  monthly installments of principal and
interest  of $15,540; due in March  2030;
collateralized    by    related    rental
property.

Note payable, interest at 1% accruing  to      1,700,000     1,700,000
principal; unpaid principal and  interest
are  due  upon  sale of  property  or  in
January  2030; collateralized by  related
rental property.

Note  payable, interest at 18%;  interest      1,520,117     1,515,128
only payable monthly to the extent of net
operating  income;  due  December   2002;
collateralized    by    related    rental
property. (A)

Note payable, interest at 7.22%; interest
only  payable  monthly in the  amount  of
$37,944; collateralized by related rental      3,933,912     3,970,156
property. (A)                                -----------   -----------
                                             $16,857,962   $17,077,741
                                             ===========   ===========

(A)   In  September  1998,  the second mortgage  lender  advanced  the
  property  $3,907,200 to repay the first mortgage with  intention  of
  refinancing  the  first  mortgage at a lower  interest  rate.   This
  refinancing was complete in January 1999 with a $4,000,000  mortgage
  loan which bears interest at 7.22%, is payable in monthly payments of
  principal and interest of $27,206 and is due in January 2009.



Maturities of debt obligation at December 31, 2000 were as follows:

          Year ending December 31,
          ------------------------

                 2001             $     8,784
                 2002               1,520,117
                 2003                       0
                 2004                       0
                 2005                 764,501
                 Thereafter        14,564,560
                                  -----------
                                  $16,857,962
                                  ===========


NOTE G - RELATED PARTIES

In  June 1998, the General Partner advanced the Partnership $77,975 to
pay  certain outstanding liabilities of the Partnership.  The  advance
is non-interest bearing and will be paid out of available cash flow.

Included  in Accounts Payable - Related Party is $330,955 at  December
31,  2000  owed  to  the  co  -  general  partner,  by  three  of  the
Partnership's  Ventures, for additional amounts advanced  for  working
capital  needs.  These advances are non-interest bearing and  will  be
paid out of available cash flow.

Included  in  Accounts Payable - Related Party is $37,271 at  December
31,  2000  owed  to  the general partner, by two of the  Partnership's
Ventures,  for additional amounts advanced for working capital  needs.
These  advances  are  non-interest bearing and will  be  paid  out  of
available cash flow.


NOTE H - GOING CONCERN

Since  the formation of Strehlow Terrace Limited Partnership  ("STLP",
one  of  the  Partnership's  ventures)  in  1990,  STLP  has  incurred
significant  losses.   In  addition, at  December  31,  2000,  current
liabilities  exceed current assets.  During 2000 the  Partnership  was
delinquent  in  payments on the mortgage and has outstanding  interest
payable of $443,812.  These factors raise substantial doubt about  the
STLP's  ability  to  continue  as  a  going  concern.   The  financial
statements were prepared assuming that STLP will continue as  a  going
concern  and  does not include any adjustments that might result  from
the outcome of this uncertainty.

NOTE I - INCOME TAX BASIS RECONCILIATION

Certain  items  enter  into  the  determination  of  the  results   of
operations in different time periods for financial reporting  ("book")
purposes and for income tax ("tax") purposes.  Reconciliations of  net
loss and partners' equity follow:

                                       For the years ended December 31,
                                         2000        1999         1998
                                         ----        ----         ----
Net loss - book                    ($1,338,104) ($1,650,894) ($2,447,292)
Excess of tax under book
 depreciation                          283,161      458,619      459,534
Interest                               103,804       94,398       85,844
Other timing differences                20,228       18,807       14,718
Minority interest - tax only            86,705      218,951      245,961
                                    ----------   ----------   ----------
Net loss - tax                     ($  844,206) ($  860,119) ($1,641,235)
                                    ==========   ==========   ==========

Partners' equity - book            ($3,797,789) ($2,459,686) ($  808,792)
Costs of issuance                    3,279,930    3,279,930    3,279,930
Cumulative tax under book loss       6,186,474    5,692,577    4,901,802
Investment credit recapture              9,900        9,900        9,900
Rehabilitation credit                 (251,117)    (251,117)    (251,117)
                                    ----------   ----------   ----------
Partner's equity - tax              $5,427,398   $6,271,604   $7,131,723
                                    ==========   ==========   ==========


NOTE J- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Strehlow  Terrace  Apartments  was foreclosed  by  the  Department  of
Housing and Urban Development, the guarantor of the first mortgage, on
April 30, 2002.

On  June 30, 2002, the partnership's investment in Saunders Apartments
was  sold for $25,000.  The proceeds of the sale were used to pay  the
accrued expenses  of  the  partnership.


<PAGE>






                       SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION



<PAGE>



                   DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                             (a limited partnership)

          SCHEDULE XI - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
          ------------------------------------------------------
                                DECEMBER 31, 2000



                                                Cost
                                            Capitalized
                       Initial Cost          Subsequent
                      to Partnership             to
                            (b)             Acquisition

                                   Buildings
                                     and                   Date    Date
                  Encum-           Improve-   Improve-      of      Ac-
Description       brances   Land    ments      ments      Constr. quired
-----------       -------   ----   ---------  --------    ------- ------
  (a)              (e)      (b)                             (a)

17 unit
apartments
and 3,000
square
feet of
retail
space in
Omaha, NE     $   840,741 $ 10,000 $ 1,774,986 $    42,723 1988   7/88

68 unit
apartments
in New
Orleans, LA       764,501     -      2,948,634     471,015 1988   7/88

32,500 square
feet of
commercial
space in
Alexandria,
VA              6,248,638  540,238   5,014,827   1,329,552 1988  12/88

70 apartment
units in
Omaha, NE       3,550,053     -        448,993   5,939,647 1989  1/89

71 unit
apartments
and 8,500
square feet of
commercial
space in
Manayunk, PA    5,454,029  400,000     664,508   9,514,808 1989  2/89
              ----------- -------- ----------- -----------
              $16,857,962 $950,238 $10,851,948 $17,297,745
              =========== ======== =========== ===========



                                 Gross Amount
                                   at which
                                  Carried at
                               December 31, 2000


                      Buildings
                        and                   Accumu-
Description           Improve-     Total       lated
    (a)       Land     ments       (c)(d)   Depr.(d)(e)
-----------   ----   ---------    -------   -----------
17 unit
apartments
and 3,000
square
feet of
retail space
in Omaha, NE $ 10,000 $ 1,817,709 $ 1,827,709 $   849,615

68 unit
apartments
in New
Orleans, LA      -      3,419,649   3,419,649   1,622,178

32,500 square
feet of
commercial
space in
Alexandria,
VA            540,238   6,344,379   6,884,617   2,711,904

70 apartment
units
in Omaha, NE     -      6,388,640   6,388,640   2,676,791

71 unit
apartments
and 8,500
square feet
of commercial
space in
Manayunk, PA  400,000  10,179,316  10,579,316   5,383,447
             -------- ----------- ----------- -----------
             $950,238 $28,149,693 $29,099,931 $13,243,935
             ======== =========== =========== ===========

                   DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                        (a limited partnership)

                         NOTES TO SCHEDULE XI

                           DECEMBER 31, 2000

(A)  All  properties are certified historic structures as  defined  in
     the  Internal  Revenue Code of 1986.  The "date of  construction"
     refers to the period in which such properties were rehabilitated.

(B)  Represents  costs  of  a  parcel of land with  historic  building
     located     thereon.     Amounts    do    not     include     any
     development/rehabilitation costs incurred pursuant to  a  turnkey
     development   agreement  entered  into  when  the  property   was
     purchased.

(C)  The  cost of real estate owned at December 31, 2000, for  Federal
     income   tax   purposes   was  approximately   $24,594,586.   The
     depreciable  basis  of  the  building  and  improvements  of  the
     properties  has been reduced for Federal income tax  purposes  by
     the historic rehabilitation credit.

(D)  Reconciliation of real estate:

                                        2000         1999         1998
                                        ----         ----         ----
Balance at beginning of year       $29,010,088  $28,984,672  $28,935,093
Additions during this year:
 Improvements                           89,843       25,416       49,579
Deductions during the year:
  Retirements                                0            0            0
                                   -----------  -----------  -----------
Balance at end of year             $29,099,931  $29,010,088  $28,984,672
                                   ===========  ===========  ===========

Reconciliation of accumulated depreciation:
                                        2000         1999         1998
                                        ----         ----         ----
Balance at beginning of year       $12,134,403  $11,038,617  $ 9,949,357
Depreciation expense for the year    1,109,532    1,095,786    1,089,260
Retirements                                  0            0            0
                                   -----------  -----------  -----------
Balance at end of year             $13,243,935  $12,134,403  $11,038,617
                                   ===========  ===========  ===========

(D)  See  Note E to the consolidated financial statements for  further
     information.

(E)  See   Note  B  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements   for
     depreciation method and lives.

Item  9.   Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial
          Disclosure

          None.

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures

          We  maintain  disclosure controls and  procedures  that  are
designed  to         ensure that information required to be  disclosed
in   our  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934   reports  is  recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods   specified
in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated
and   communicated to our management, including our managing partner's
principal       executive officer and principal financial officer,  as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions  regarding required disclosure.
In    designing   and   evaluating   the   disclosure   controls   and
procedures,   our   management  recognized  that  any   controls   and
procedures,  no matter    how well designed and operated, can  provide
only   reasonable   assurance  of  achieving   the   desired   control
objectives,  and  our  management necessarily was  required  to  apply
its  judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of  possible
controls and   procedures.

          Under  the  supervision of our managing partner's  principal
executive  officer and    principal financial officer we have  carried
out  an  evaluation of the effectiveness of our     adopted disclosure
controls  and procedures as of the end of the period covered  by  this
report.   Based upon that evaluation, our managing partner's president
and  treasurer  concluded that our disclosure controls and  procedures
are effective.

          There  have  been  no significant changes  in  our  internal
controls over financial  reporting that has materially affected, or is
reasonably  likely  to materially affect, our  internal  control  over
financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter.

<PAGE>

                               PART III

Item 10.  Directors and Executive Officers of Registrant

            a.  Identification  of  Directors  -  Registrant  has   no
directors.

          b. Identification of Executive Officers

              The  General Partner of the Registrant is Dover Historic
Advisors  VI  (DoHA-VI),  a  Pennsylvania  general  partnership.   The
partners of DoHA-VI are as follows:

Name         Age     Position         Term of Office    Period Served
----         ---     --------         --------------    -------------

SWDHA, Inc.   --   Partner in DoHA-VI  No fixed term   Since May 1997

EPK, Inc.     --   Partner in DoHA-VI  No fixed term   Since May 1997

             For further description of DoHA - VI, see paragraph e. of
this  Item.   There is no arrangement or understanding between  either
person  named above and any other person pursuant to which any  person
was or is to be selected as an officer.

            c.   Identification  of  Certain  Significant   Employees.
Registrant  has  no  employees.   Its administrative  and  operational
functions  are  carried  out  by property management  and  partnership
administration firm engaged by the Registrant.

           d.  Family  Relationships.  There is no family relationship
between or among the executive officers and/or any person nominated or
chosen by Registrant to become an executive officer.

          e.   Business  Experience. DoHA-VI is a general  partnership
formed in 1987.  The General Partner is responsible for management and
control  of  Registrant's affairs and will have general responsibility
and  authority in conducting its operations.  The General Partner  may
retain its affiliates to manage certain of the Properties.

         On May 13, 1997, SWDHA, Inc. replaced Gerald Katzoff and EPK,
Inc.  replaced DHP, Inc. as partners of DoHA-VI.  Spencer  Wertheimer,
the  President  and Sole Director of SWDHA, Inc., is an attorney  with
extensive experience in real estate activities and ventures.

         EPK, Inc. is a Delaware corporation formed for the purpose of
managing properties or interests therein.  EPK, Inc. is a wholly-owned
subsidiary  of D, LTD, an entity formed in 1985 to act as the  holding
company  for  various  corporations engaged  in  the  development  and
management of historically certified properties and conventional  real
estate  as  well  as  a provider of financial (non-banking)  services.
EPK, Inc. is an affiliate of DoHA-VI.

         The officers and directors of EPK, Inc. are described below.

          Spencer  Wertheimer was appointed May 13, 1997 as President,
Treasurer  and  Sole  Director of EPK,  Inc.   Mr.  Wertheimer  is  an
attorney  with  extensive  experience in real  estate  activities  and
ventures.

          Donna  M. Zanghi (age 42) was appointed on May 13,  1997  as
Vice  President  and  Secretary of EPK, Inc.   Ms.  Zanghi  previously
served  as Secretary and Treasurer of DHP, Inc.  since June  14,  1993
and  as  a  Director  and Secretary/Treasurer  of  D,  LTD.   She  was
associated with DHP, Inc. and its affiliates since 1984 except for the
period from December 1986 to June 1989 and the period from November 1,
1992 to June 14, 1993.

          Michele F. Rudoi (age 34) was appointed on May 13,  1997  as
Assistant  Secretary  of  EPK, Inc.  Ms. Rudoi  previously  served  as
Assistant  Secretary and Director of both D, LTD and DHP,  Inc.  since
January 27, 1993.

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

           a. Cash Compensation - During 2000, Registrant paid no cash
compensation  to DoHA-VI, any partner therein or any person  named  in
paragraph c. of Item 10.

           b.  Compensation Pursuant to Plans - Registrant has no plan
pursuant to which compensation was paid or distributed during 2000, or
is  proposed to be paid or distributed in the future, to DoHA-VI,  any
partner  therein, or any person named in paragraph c. of  Item  10  of
this report.

           c. Other Compensation - No compensation not referred to  in
paragraph  a.  or  paragraph b. of this Item was paid  or  distributed
during  2000 to DoHA-VI, any partner therein, or any person  named  in
paragraph c. of Item 10.

           d. Compensation of Directors - Registrant has no directors.

           e. Termination of Employment and Change of Control Arrangement -
Registrant  has no compensatory plan or arrangement, with  respect  to
any  individual, which results or will result from the resignation  or
retirement  of any individual, or any termination of such individual's
employment  with Registrant or from a change in control of  Registrant
or  a  change in such individual's responsibilities following  such  a
change in control.

Item  12.   Security  Ownership  of  Certain  Beneficial  Owners   and
Management

           a.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial  Owners  -  No
person is known to Registrant to be the beneficial owner of more  than
five percent of the issued and outstanding Units.

           b. Security Ownership of Management - None.

           c.  Changes  in Control - Registrant does not know  of  any
arrangement, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in
a change in control of Registrant.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

           a.  Pursuant to Registrant's Amended and Restated Agreement
of  Limited  Partnership, DoHA-VI is entitled to 10%  of  Registrant's
distributable cash from operations in each year.  There  was  no  such
share allocable to DoHA-VI for fiscal years 1997 through 2000.

           b.  Certain  Business Relationships  -  Registrant  has  no
directors.   For  a  description  of  business  relationships  between
Registrant  and certain affiliated persons, see paragraph a.  of  this
Item.

           c.  Indebtedness  of Management - No executive  officer  or
significant  employee of Registrant, Registrant's general partner  (or
any  employee thereof), or any affiliate of any such person, is or has
at any time been indebted to Registrant.

<PAGE>


                                PART IV

Item 14. (A)     Exhibits,  Financial Statement Schedules and  Reports
                 on Form 8-K.

         1.   Financial Statements:

              a. Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2000 and 1999.

              b. Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
                 December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.

              c. Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' Equity for
                 the Years Ended  December  31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.

              d. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
                 December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.

              e. Notes   to   consolidated   financial statements.

          2.  Financial statement schedules:

              a. Schedule XI - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation.

              b. Notes to Schedule XI.

          3.  Exhibits:

              (a) Document         Exhibit Number
                  --------         --------------
                   3               Registrant's   Amended   and
                                   Restated   Certificate    of
                                   Limited   Partnership    and
                                   Agreement     of     Limited
                                   Partnership,      previously
                                   filed  as  part of Amendment
                                   No.    2   of   Registrant's
                                   Registration  Statement   on
                                   Form  S-11, are incorporated
                                   herein by reference.

                 21                Subsidiaries     of      the
                                   Registrant  are  listed   in
                                   Item  2. Properties of  this
                                   Form 10-K.

                 31                General   Partners   Opinion
                                   Certification

                 32                Certification Pursuant to 18
                                   U.S.C.   Section  1350,   As
                                   Adopted  Pursuant to Section
                                   906 o the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
                                   of 2002

             (b) Reports on Form 8-K:

                 No  reports were filed on Form 8-K during the quarter
                 ended December 31, 2000.

             (c) Exhibits: See Item 14 (A) (3) above.


<PAGE>

                              SIGNATURES

      Pursuant  to  the requirements of Section 13  or  15(d)  of  the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 the registrant has duly  caused  this
report  to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto  duly
authorized.

Date: July 19, 2004        DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
      -------------
                           By: Dover Historic Advisors VI, its
                               general partner

                               By: EPK, Inc., managing partner

                                   By: /s/ Spencer Wertheimer
                                       ----------------------
                                       SPENCER WERTHEIMER
                                       President (principal executive
                                       officer, principal financial
                                       officer)

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


               DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI

                           By: Dover Historic Advisors VI, its
                               general partner

                               By: EPK, Inc., managing partner

Date: July 19, 2004                By: /s/ Spencer Wertheimer
      -------------                    ----------------------
                                       SPENCER WERTHEIMER
                                       President (principal executive
                                       officer, principal financial
                                       officer)

<PAGE>



                                                            Exhibit 31

                             CERTIFICATION

  I, Spencer Wertheimer, certify that:

1.    I  have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the  period
 ended December 31, 2000 of Diversified Historic Investors VI;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any  untrue
 statement  of  a  material  fact or omit to  state  a  material  fact
 necessary  to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
 under  which  such statements were made, not misleading with  respect
 to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based  on  my  knowledge, the financial statements,  and  other
 financial information included in this report, fairly present in  all
 material respects the financial condition, results of operations  and
 cash  flows  of the registrant as of, and for, the periods  presented
 in this report;

4.     I  am  responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure
 controls  and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e)
 and  15d-15(e))  [Omission in accordance with SEC  Release  Nos.  33-
 8238,  34-47986  and IC-26068 (June 5, 2003)] for the registrant  and
 have:

  (a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or  caused
    such  disclosure controls and procedures to be designed  under  my
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating  to  the
    registrant,  including  its  consolidated  subsidiaries,  is  made
    known  to me by others within those entities, particularly  during
    the period in which this report is being prepared;

  (b)     [Omitted  in accordance with SEC Release Nos.  33-8238,  34-
    47986 and IC-26068 (June 5, 2003)];

  (c)     Evaluated  the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure
    controls   and  procedures  and  presented  in  this   report   my
    conclusions  about  the effectiveness of the  disclosure  controls
    and  procedures,  as  of  the end of the period  covered  by  this
    report based on such evaluation; and

  (d)     Disclosed  in  this  report any change in  the  registrant's
    internal  control  over financial reporting that  occurred  during
    the  registrant's  most  recent fiscal quarter  (the  registrant's
    fourth  fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)  that  has
    materially   affected,  or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially
    affect,   the   registrant's  internal  control   over   financial
    reporting; and

5.    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
 control  over  financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors  and
 the  audit  committee  of  the registrant's board  of  directors  (or
 persons performing the equivalent functions):

  (a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in  the
    design  or  operation of internal control over financial reporting
    which  are  reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
    ability   to  record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial
    information; and

  (b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
    or   other   employees  who  have  a  significant  role   in   the
    registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: July 19, 2004                            /s/ Spencer Wertheimer
      -------------                            ----------------------
                                        Name:  Spencer Wertheimer
                                       Title:  President
                                               (principal executive
                                                officer, principal
                                                financial officer) of the
                                                registrant's managing
                                                partner, EPK, Inc.


<PAGE>

                                                            Exhibit 32

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

  In  connection  with  the  Annual Report  of   Diversified  Historic
Investors  VI on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,  2000  as
filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  hereof
(the "Report"), I, Spencer Wertheimer, President and Treasurer of  the
Company's managing partner, EPK, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18  U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects, the financial condition and results of  operations
of the Company.



Date: July 19, 2004                            /s/ Spencer Wertheimer
      -------------                            ----------------------
                                        Name:  Spencer Wertheimer
                                       Title:  President
                                               (principal executive
                                                officer, principal
                                                financial officer) of the
                                                registrant's managing
                                                partner, EPK, Inc.

<PAGE>