alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 158 (Thursday, August 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46082-46083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4010]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics: Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS) announces the following advisory 
committee meeting.

    Name: National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) 
Ad Hoc Work Group on Secondary Uses of Health Data.
    Time and Date: August 23, 2007, 9 a.m.-5:30 p.m., August 24, 
2007, 9 a.m.-5:30 p.m.
    Place: Hubert H. Humphrey Building, Room 305A, 200 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201.
    Status: Open.
    Purpose: The NCVHS Working Group will meet to discuss its work 
to develop a

[[Page 46083]]

conceptual framework that includes (1) a taxonomy describing types 
of uses and users of health data; (2) provides guiding principles 
that balance the risk, sensitivity, benefits, obligations, and 
protections of various uses of health data, and (3) clarifies 
terminology associated with various uses of health data. The group 
will also begin to gather information from a wide variety of 
stakeholders on issues related to secondary uses of data. Initial 
consideration will be placed on how data are used in the processing 
and management of data directly associated with quality measurement, 
reporting, and improvement.
    For Further Information Contact: Substantive program information 
as well as summaries of meetings and a roster of committee members 
may be obtained from Debbie Jackson, Senior Program Analyst, NCVHS, 
National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control 
and Prevention, 3311 Toledo Road, Room 2339, Hyattsville, Maryland 
20782, telephone (301) 458-4614 or Marjorie S. Greenberg, Executive 
Secretary, NCVHS, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention, Room 1100, Presidential Building, 
3311 Toledo Road, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, telephone: (301) 458-
4245. Information also is available on the NCVHS home page of the 
HHS Web site: http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/ where an agenda for the 
meeting will be posted when available. Should you require reasonable 
accommodation, please contact the CDC Office of Equal Employment 
Opportunity on (301) 458-4EEO (4336) as soon as possible.

    Dated: August 9, 2007.
James Scanlon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Science and Data Policy (OASPE), Office 
of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 07-4010 Filed 8-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4151-05-M
#### Gregory NOVAS, Appellant, v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 14410.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Sept. 25, 1958.

Decided Oct. 6, 1958.

Mr. Hyman J. Cohen, Washington, D'.. C. , for appellant.

Mr. Robert R. Faulkner, Washington,. D. C., for appellee.

Before Edgerton, Chief Judge, and’ Bazelon and Washington, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in a negligence action-appeals from a summary judgment for-the defendant. According to the plaintiff’s pretrial statement: “On June 27,. 1954, plaintiff took his wife and daughter to defendant’s depot in Wilson, North Carolina, and carried their luggage on to-one of defendant’s cars. Plaintiff was-assisting his wife and daughter who were traveling on defendant’s train No. 78. Plaintiff had permission of the conductor to board the car, and the conductor-knew of plaintiff’s presence. Before he-got off, defendant set the train in motion. Defendant did not give plaintiff an opportunity to alight, did not notify plaintiff that the train was about to move,. did not notify plaintiff that the train was moving, and *without this knowledge-*plaintiff proceeded to alight and was. caused to fall from the train.” (Emphasis added.)

We think this was not a case for summary judgment. When a train has-*957stopped at a station, one who gets off the train without discovering that it has started again may or may not be negligent. The time the train has been moving, the distance it has moved, the speed it has attained, the nearness and conspicuousness of people or things that are not moving, and other circumstances may affect the question. Cf. Lambeth v. North Carolina R. Co., 1872, 66 N.C. 494, 499. We have no reason to think the North Carolina courts would hold the present plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Appel-lee’s reliance on Jiggetts v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 99 U.S.App.D.C. 249, 239 F.2d 69, is therefore misplaced.

Reversed.
Accountants Preferability letter



 Exhibit 10.18 
 

 
 February 2, 2006 
 Star Gas Partners, L.P. 
 2187 Atlantic Street 
 Stamford, Connecticut 06902 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 We
have been furnished with a copy of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”) for the three months ended December 31, 2005, and have read the Partnership’s statements contained in Note 3 to
the condensed consolidated financial statements included therein. As stated in Note 3, the Partnership changed its method of accounting for accounting for inventory to the weighted average cost method from the first-in, first-out method and states
that the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances because it reflects a more accurate correlation between revenues and product costs experienced in the Partnership’s business environment by normalizing the carrying
cost of heating oil and other fuels given the increasing short-term volatility in the marketplace for these products. In accordance with your request, we have reviewed and discussed with Partnership officials the circumstances and business judgment
and planning upon which the decision to make this change in the method of accounting was based. 
 We have not audited any financial
statements of the Partnership as of any date or for any period subsequent to September 30, 2005, nor have we audited the information set forth in the aforementioned Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements; accordingly, we do
not express an opinion concerning the factual information contained therein. 
 With regard to the aforementioned accounting change,
authoritative criteria have not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another acceptable method. However, for purposes of the Partnership’s compliance with the requirements of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, we are furnishing this letter. 
 Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on management’s
business judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is preferable in the Partnership’s circumstances. 
 Very truly yours,
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Vista Continental Corporation.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30th, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Lawrence Nash, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                                                      /s/ Lawrence Nash
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Lawrence Nash
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
January 20th, 2004
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Transportation
 AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), DOT.
 ACTION: List of applications delayed more than 180 days.
 SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(c), PHMSA is publishing the following list of special permit applications that have been in process for 180 days or more. The reason(s) for delay and the expected completion date for action on each application is provided in association with each identified application.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Delmer F. Billings, Director, Office of Hazardous Materials Special Permits and Approvals, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, East Building, PHH-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001, (202) 366-4535. Key to “Reason for Delay” 1. Awaiting additional information from applicant. 2. Extensive public comment under review. 3. Application is technically complex and is of significant impact or precedent-setting and requires extensive analysis.
                        ( print page 45493) 4. Staff review delayed by other priority issues or volume of special permit applications. Meaning of Application Number Suffixes N—New application. M—Modification request. PM—Party to application with modification request. Issued in Washington, DC, on August 8, 2007. Delmer F. Billings, Director, Office of Hazardous Materials, Special Permits and Approvals.
 Modification to Special Permits
Application number
Applicant
Reason for delay
Estimated date of completion10481-M
M-1 Engineering Limited, Bradfrod, West Yorkshire
4
09-30-200714167-M
Trinityrail, Dallas, TX
1,3,4
09-30-20078915-M
Matheson Tri Gas, East Rutherford, NJ
4
08-31-2007
 New Special Permit Applications
Application number
Applicant
Reason for delay
Estimated date of completion14385-N
Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Kansas City, MO
4
09-30-200714442-N
Trinityrail, Dallas, TX
4
09-30-200714482-N
Classic Helicopters, Woods Cross, UT
1
08-31-200714483-N
WEW Westerwaelder Eisenwerk, Weitefeld Germany
4
10-31-200714470-N
Marsulex, Inc., Springfield, OR
4
08-31-200714457-N
Amtrol Alfa Metalomecanica SA, Portugal
4
09-30-200714436-N
BNSF Railway Company, Topeka, KS
4
09-30-200714402-N
Lincoln Composites, Lincoln, NE
1
12-31-2007


[FR Doc. 07-3974  Filed 8-13-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-60-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 140 (Monday, July 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 40125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3558]

[[Page 40125]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[DoD-2007-OS-0076]

Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records

AGENCY: DoD, Defense Logistics Agency.

ACTION: Notice of Delete a System of Records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Defense Logistics Agency is deleting a system of records 
notice to its existing inventory of record systems subject to the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This action will be effective without further notice on August 
22, 2007 unless comments are received that would result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Privacy Act Officer, Headquarters, 
Defense Logistics Agency, ATTN: DP, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Stop 
2533, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6221.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jody Sinkler at (703) 767-5045.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Logistics Agency notices for 
systems of records subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), 
as amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are 
available from the address above.
    The specific changes to the record system being amended are set 
forth below followed by the notice, as amended, published in its 
entirety. The proposed amendment is not within the purview of 
subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, 
which requires the submission of a new or altered system report.

    Dated: July 17, 2007.
L.M. Bynum
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
S600.60

System name:
    DLA Workplace Lactation Program Records (July 6, 2005, 70 FR 38893)

Reason:
    Defense Logistic Agency does not collect and maintain personally 
identifiable information (PII) about the participants in the program.

[FR Doc. 07-3558 Filed 7-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
```
Exhibit 21

Central And South West Corporation
Subsidiaries Of The Registrant
As Of December 31, 1995

Company Name
Business Conducted Under Same Name            State or Jurisdiction of
                                              Incorporation

Central Power and Light Company               Texas
539 North Carancahua Street
Corpus Christi, Texas  78401-2802

Public Service Company of Oklahoma            Oklahoma
212 East 6th Street
Tulsa, Oklahoma  74119-1212

Southwestern Electric Power Company           Delaware
428 Travis Street
Shreveport, Louisiana  71156-0001

West Texas Utilities Company                  Texas
301 Cypress Street
Abilene, Texas  79601-5820

SEEBOARD, plc                                 United Kingdom
Registered Office
Forest Gate, Brighton Road
Crawley, West Sussex  RH11 9BH

Transok, Inc.                                 Oklahoma
110 West 7th Street
Tulsa, Oklahoma  74119-1044

Central and South West Services, Inc.         Texas
2 West Second Street
Tulsa, Oklahoma  74103-3102
      and
1616 Woodall Rodgers Freeway
Dallas, Texas  75202-1234

CSW Communications, Inc.                      Delaware
1705  South Capital of Texas Highway
Suite 400
Austin, Texas  78746

CSW Credit, Inc.                              Delaware
1616 Woodall Rodgers Freeway
Dallas, Texas  75202-1234

CSW Energy, Inc.                              Texas
1616 Woodall Rodgers Freeway
Dallas, Texas  75202-1234

CSW International, Inc.                       Delaware
1616 Woodall Rodgers Freeway
Dallas, Texas 75202-1234

CSW Leasing, Inc.                             Delaware
1616 Woodall Rodgers Freeway
Dallas, Texas  75202-1234

EnerShop Inc.                                 Delaware
1616 Woodall Rodgers Freeway
Dallas, Texas 75202-1234
From: jamesjohnson8@mac.com [mailto:jamesjohnson8@mac.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:04 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

james johnson 

264 hooper st 

athens, OH 45701
§ 10.31 Requests for records. ( a ) Ordinarily, each person desiring to determine whether a record pertaining to him/her is contained in a system of records covered by this part or desiring access to a record covered by this part, or to obtain a copy of such a record, shall make a request in writing addressed to the system manager. The “Privacy Act Issuances” published by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, describes the systems of records maintained by all Federal agencies, including the Department and its components. In exceptional cases oral requests are accepted. A description of DOT Privacy Act systems notices is available through the Internet free of charge at *http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/aces/PrivacyAct.shtml?desc015.html .* See § 10.13(b) regarding inquiries concerning Privacy Act matters or requests for assistance.
( b ) Each request shall specify the name of the requesting individual and the system of records in which the subject record is located or thought to be located. If assistance is required to determine the system of records identification number assigned in the systems notices, such assistance may be obtained from the appropriate Privacy Act officer or his assistant. Refer to § 10.13 for procedures for requesting assistance.
[45 FR 8993, Feb. 11, 1980, as amended at 62 FR 23667, May 1, 1997]
1

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

________________________

No. 95-4403 _______________________

D.C. Docket No. 94-6258-CIV-UUB 

CARL EUGENE WATTS,

Petitioner-Appellee,

versus

HARRY K. SINGLETARY, 

Respondent-Appellant.

_______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida _______________________

(December 19, 1996)

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion July 18, 1996, 11th Cir., 87 F.3d 1282)

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, KRAVITCH, ANDERSON,

EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Court having been polled at the request of one of the

members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are

in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule
2

35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule

35-5), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

BARKETT, Circuit Judge, dissenting: 

I respectfully dissent from the order of the majority of the

court in denying the petition of appellee Carl Watts for en banc

rehearing. This case presents important issues which, for

reasons stated in Judge Carnes’s dissent, were erroneously

decided.
#### § 179.201-4 Material.

All fittings, tubes, and castings and all projections and their closures, except for protective housing, must also meet the requirements specified in ASTM A 262 (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter), except that when preparing the specimen for testing the carburized surface may be finished by grinding or machining.

[68 FR 75762, Dec. 31, 2003]
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.509 General. ( a ) Operators must have a written qualification program by April 27, 2001. The program must be available for review by the Administrator or by a state agency participating under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 601 if the program is under the authority of that state agency.
( b ) Operators must complete the qualification of individuals performing covered tasks by October 28, 2002.
( c ) Work performance history review may be used as a sole evaluation method for individuals who were performing a covered task prior to October 26, 1999.
( d ) After October 28, 2002, work performance history may not be used as a sole evaluation method.
( e ) After December 16, 2004, observation of on-the-job performance may not be used as the sole method of evaluation.
[Amdt. 195-67, 64 FR 46866, Aug. 27, 1999, as amended by Amdt. 195-72, 66 FR 43524, Aug. 20, 2001; Amdt. 195-84, 70 FR 10336, Mar. 3, 2005]
-----Original Message----- 

From: sandhill08@gmail.com [mailto:sandhill08@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:09 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Christine Hannum 

1035 N. Hoff Ave. #1 

Tucson, AZ 85705
###### Editorial Note on Part 195

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.202 Compliance with specifications or standards.

Each pipeline system must be constructed in accordance with comprehensive written specifications or standards that are consistent with the requirements of this part.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 30, 2021

No. 04-21-00398-CR

IN RE David Munoz VEGA

From the 63rd Judicial District Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10324

Honorable Enrique Fernandez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

The Relator's Motion to Withdraw the Motion for Leave to File Mandamus Petition is 

hereby GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED on September 30, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
#### § 179.500 Specification DOT-107A * * * * seamless steel tank car tanks.
-----Original Message----- 

From: NEATinfo@yahoo.com [mailto:NEATinfo@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:41 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

As a mental health professional, I can assure you that access to 

affordable mental health care is vital to individuals, families and 

communities. Without adequat care and interventions, people with mental 

health issues may end up homeless, hospitalized or even incarcerated. 

Please support this rule that would allow people to seek the help they 

need to survive. 

Sincerely, 

Laurie Roberts 

1997 Plumas St. 

Reno, NV 89509