alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 6, 1995 (110), Para 110.12 Waiving Points of Order Against the Conference Report on H.R. 1854]
[Pages 1302-1303]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.110.12  waiving points of order against the conference report on 
          h.r. 1854

  Mr. DIAZ-BALART, by direction of the Committee on Rules, called up the 
following resolution (H. Res. 206):

       Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be 
     in order to consider the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R. 1854) making appropriations for the Legislative 
     Branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for 
     other purposes. All points of order against the conference 
     report and against its consideration are waived.

  When said resolution was considered.
  After debate,
  Mr. DIAZ-BALART moved the previous question on the resolution to its 
adoption or rejection.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House now order the previous question?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, announced that 
the nays had it.

[[Page 1303]]

  Mr. SOLOMON objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  A quorum not being present,
  The roll was called under clause 4, rule XV, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

Yeas

228

When there appeared

Nays

179
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: jasoncross2003@yahoo.com [mailto:jasoncross2003@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 1:52 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jason Cross 

827 Arlington Ave 

Berkeley, CA 94707
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of J.J.G., L.K.G., H.A.G., and A.G.G., Children

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 6

- 0 0104

- CV

Trial court case number: 2014

- 00610J

Trial court: 313th District Court of Harris County

Appellee

, the Department of Family and Protective Services

, has filed a motion for

rehearing and a motion for en banc reconsideration

. The Court requests a response to the motion

for rehearing and the motion for en banc reconsideration from appell ants, M.G. and J.R.G

. The

response must be filed no later than 5:00 p.m., 2 0 days from the date of this order

. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 49.2.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 8, 2016
§ 179.400-10 Sump or siphon bowl. A sump or siphon bowl may be in the bottom of the inner tank shell if— ( a ) It is formed directly into the inner tank shell, or is formed and welded to the inner tank shell and is of weldable quality metal that is compatible with the inner tank shell;
( b ) The stress in any orientation under any condition does not exceed the circumferential stress in the inner tank shell; and
( c ) The wall thickness is not less than that specified in § 179.401-1.
#### Albert Reed, as Administrator of the Estate of James B. Wiley, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Edrick Farrand et al., Appellants.

(Submitted May 31, 1910;

decided June 7, 1910.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 198 N. Y. 620.)
-----Original Message----- 

From: jporterlara@gmail.com [mailto:jporterlara@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:40 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jami Porter lara 

1724 Leonora Dr NW 

Albuquerque, NM 87104
-----Original Message----- 

From: bgodusky@pcprotechs.com [mailto:bgodusky@pcprotechs.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:40 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Barry Godusky 

113 Gap Rd 

Macungie, PA 18062
###### Editorial Note on Part 195

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.256 Crossing of railroads and highways.

The pipe at each railroad or highway crossing must be installed so as to adequately withstand the dynamic forces exerted by anticipated traffic loads.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141844 & (62) 

DAVID W. ALLARD, as Trustee of the 

Bankruptcy Estate of LAURA J. WILAMOWSKI, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 141844 

 COA: 285633 

Oakland CC: 2006-075483-NI 

JOSEPH A. SOVA and CLARKSTON STEEL, 

INC., 

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant, 

and 

CONRAD C. WILAMOWSKI, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

MIRASH BOJAJ, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 24, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The application 

for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is therefore moot and is DENIED. 

 ZAHRA, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
§ 178.1045 Drop test. ( a ) *General.* The drop test must be conducted for the qualification of all Flexible Bulk Container design types and performed periodically as specified in § 178.1035(e) of this subpart.
( b ) *Special preparation for the drop test.* Flexible Bulk Containers must be filled to their maximum permissible gross mass.
( c ) *Test method.* ( 1 ) A sample of all Flexible Bulk Container design types must be dropped onto a rigid, non-resilient, smooth, flat and horizontal surface. This test surface must be large enough to be immovable during testing and sufficiently large enough to ensure that the test Flexible Bulk Container falls entirely upon the surface. The test surface must be kept free from local defects capable of influencing the test results.
( 2 ) Following the drop, the Flexible Bulk Container must be restored to the upright position for observation.
( d ) *Drop height.* ( 1 ) For all Flexible Bulk Containers, drop heights are specified as follows: Packing group III: 0.8 m (2.6 feet)
( 2 ) Drop tests are to be performed with the solid to be transported or with a non-hazardous material having essentially the same physical characteristics.
( e ) *Criteria for passing the test.* For all Flexible Bulk Container design types there may be no loss of the filling substance. However a slight discharge (e.g., from closures or stitch holes) upon impact is not considered a failure of the Flexible Bulk Container provided that no further leakage occurs after the container has been restored to the upright position.
-----Original Message----- 

From: faymurph@aol.com [mailto:faymurph@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:37 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Fay Murphy 

5932 Java Plum Lane 

Bradenton, FL 34203
From: Thomas Finseth

To: Nguyen, Dan-Tam

Date: 1/17/2014 12:02 PM

Subject: Fwd: FW: Follow up to comments on proposed Steam Electric effluent guidelines

Attachments: Ltr to NRG Energy_Keystone_Jan 17 2014.pdf

Please log into the steam record.

>>> "Jordan, Ronald" <Jordan.Ronald@epa.gov> 1/17/2014 11:54 AM >>>

From: Jordan, Ronald 

Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 11:53 AM

To: stephen.frank@nrgenergy.com

Cc: Alicea, Jezebele; Flanders, Phillip; Schroeder, Cuc; Shriner, Paul

Subject: Follow up to comments on proposed Steam Electric effluent guidelines

Good morning Mr. Frank,

As you are aware, on June 7, 2013, EPA published proposed revisions to the effluent limitations guidelines and standards (ELGs) for 

the steam electric power generating point source category. The comment period for the proposed rule closed on September 20. 

Based on our review of comments submitted by your company and other comments relating to the proposed ELGs, we have 

concluded that additional information is either needed or would be useful in evaluating comments with respect to FGD wastewater 

characterization and treatment performance. Please see the attached letter for a description of the information that EPA is asking 

you to provide.

We appreciate the information you’ve provided to date, as well as the cooperation your company provided as EPA collected 

information for the proposed rule. Should you have any questions regarding this request for additional information related to the 

comments we received, please contact me at jordan.ronald@epa.gov or by phone at (202) 566-1003.

Regards,

Ron Jordan

-------------------------------

Ron Jordan

EPA Office of Water

Engineering and Analysis Division

(202) 566-1003
###### Editorial Note on Part 193

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

#### § 193.2613 Auxiliary power sources.

Each auxiliary power source must be tested monthly to check its operational capability and tested annually for capacity. The capacity test must take into account the power needed to start up and simultaneously operate equipment that would have to be served by that power source in an emergency.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending August 17, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 1572.405 Procedures for collection by TSA. This section describes the procedures that an individual, who applies to obtain or renew an HME for a CDL, must follow if a TSA agent collects and transmits the Information Collection Fee, Threat Assessment Fee, and FBI Fee. ( a ) *Imposition of fees.* ( 1 ) An individual who applies to obtain or renew an HME, or the individuals' employer, must remit to the TSA agent the Information Collection Fee, Threat Assessment Fee, and FBI Fee, in a form and manner approved by TSA, when the individual submits the application required under 49 CFR part 1572.
( 2 ) TSA shall publish the Information Collection Fee and Threat Assessment Fee described in this subpart for an individual who applies to obtain or renew an HME as a Notice in the Federal Register. TSA reviews the amount of the fees periodically, at least once every two years, to determine the current cost of conducting security threat assessments. Fee amounts and any necessary revisions to the fee amounts shall be determined by current costs, using a method of analysis consistent with widely accepted accounting principles and practices, and calculated in accordance with the provisions of 31 U.S.C. 9701 and other applicable Federal law.
( 3 ) The FBI Fee required for the FBI to process fingerprint identification records and name checks required under 49 CFR part 1572 is determined by the FBI under Public Law 101-515. If the FBI amends this fee, TSA or its agent, will collect the amended fee.
( b ) *Collection of fees.* A TSA agent will collect the fees required under this section, when an individual submits an application to the TSA agent, in accordance with 49 CFR part 1572.
( c ) *Remittance of fees.* ( 1 ) Fees required under this section, which are remitted to a TSA agent, must be made in U.S. currency, drawn on a U.S. bank, and made payable to the “Transportation Security Administration.”
( 2 ) Fees required under this section must be remitted by check, money order, wire, or any other payment method acceptable to TSA.
( 3 ) TSA will not issue any refunds of fees required under this section.
( 4 ) Applications, submitted in accordance with 49 CFR part 1572, will be processed only upon receipt of all applicable fees under this section.
[72 FR 3595, Jan. 25, 2007, as amended at 78 FR 24359, Apr. 25, 2013]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, September 18, 1995 (116), Para 116.33 Additional Sponsors]
[Page 1373]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.116.33  additional sponsors

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were added to public bills and 
resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 60: Mr. Moorhead.
       H.R. 387: Mr. Moorhead.
       H.R. 528: Mr. Pickett, Mr. Bliley, Mr. Bevill, Mr. Watts of 
     Oklahoma, Mr. Fox, and Mr. Jones.
       H.R. 530: Mr. Pombo.
       H.R. 632: Mr. Fields of Texas.
       H.R. 743: Mr. Brownback, Mrs. Waldholtz, and Mrs. Lincoln.
       H.R. 783: Mr. Ramstad, Mr. Thornton, and Mr. Doolittle.
       H.R. 784: Mr. Norwood, Mr. Jones, Mr. Cooley, Mr. Barr, Mr. 
     Fox, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Bunn of Oregon, Mr. Hastings of 
     Washington, Mr. Stockman, Mr. Bryant of Tennessee, Mr. Baker 
     of California, and Mrs. Kelly.
       H.R. 1161: Mr. Linder and Mr. Stearns.
       H.R. 1221: Mr. Horn.
       H.R. 1226: Mr. Knollenberg.
       H.R. 1227: Mr. Engel and Mrs. Meyers of Kansas.
       H.R. 1264: Mr. Mfume.
       H.R. 1506: Mr. Bliley.
       H.R. 1589: Mr. Burr and Mr. Riggs.
       H.R. 1651: Mr. LoBiondo.
       H.R. 1692: Mr. Petri.
       H.R. 1693: Mr. Petri and Mr. Hamilton.
       H.R. 1694: Mr. Petri.
       H.R. 1715: Mr. Bryant of Tennessee, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. 
     Cooley, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Ewing, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Hastings of 
     Washington, Mr. Herger, Mr. Lightfoot, Mr. Radanovich, Mr. 
     Roberts, Ms. Pryce, Mr. Spence, and Mr. Wolf.
       H.R. 1733: Mr. Bishop.
       H.R. 1744: Mr. Bryant of Tennessee.
       H.R. 1764: Mr. Hancock and Mrs. Chenoweth.
       H.R. 1965: Mr. Castle, Mr. Matsui, Mr. Torricelli, Ms. 
     Harman, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Deutsch, Mr. Peterson of Florida, Mr. 
     Stearns, Mr. Lipinski, and Mr. Longley.
       H.R. 1975: Mr. Ehrlich.
       H.R. 2006: Mrs. Morella.
       H.R. 2066: Mr. Dornan.
       H.R. 2143: Mr. Mfume.
       H.R. 2179: Mr. Lipinski.
       H.R. 2249: Ms. Rivers.
       H.R. 2265: Mr. Hancock, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. Callahan.
       H.R. 2331: Mr. Zeliff and Mr. Chrysler.
       H.J. Res: 61: Mr. Talent.
       H. Con. Res. 51: Mr. Davis, Mr. Shays, Mr. Franks of 
     Connecticut, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Lipinski, and Mr. Rohrabacher.
```
J. S71035/14

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

: PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee :

:

v. :

:

:

LARRY MARKLE, :

:

Appellant : No. 513 MDA 2014

Appeal from the PCRA Order February 12, 2013

In the Court of Common Pleas of York County 

Criminal Division No(s): CP-67-CR-0001337-1975

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., PANELLA, and FITZGERALD,*JJ.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY FITZGERALD, J.: FILED FEBRUARY 19, 2016

Appellant, Larry Markle, appeals from the order dismissing as untimely 

his third Post Conviction Relief Act1(“PCRA”) petition seeking relief, in light 

of Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012), from a mandatory sentence 

of life imprisonment without parole imposed on October 29, 1979. This 

Court previously denied Appellant’s counsel petition to withdraw and directed 

him to submit an amended Turner/Finley2letter or an advocate’s brief to 

address whether the retroactive application of Miller could be considered 

 

*

Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.

1 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546.

2 See Commonwealth v. Turner, 544 A.2d 927 (Pa. 1988); 

Commonwealth v. Finley, 550 A.2d 213 (Pa. Super. 1988) (en banc).
J. S71035/14

- 2 -

outside the framework of the PCRA. Appellant’s counsel has filed an 

advocate’s brief and the Commonwealth has filed a supplemental responsive 

brief. 

While this appeal was pending, the United States Supreme Court 

decided Montgomery v. Louisana, ___ S. Ct. ___, 2016 WL 280758 (U.S. 

Jan. 25, 2016), and held “that when a new substantive rule of constitutional 

law controls the outcome of a case, the Constitution requires state collateral 

review courts to give retroactive effect to that rule.” Montgomery, 2016 

WL 280758 at *7. The Montgomery Court concluded that Miller

“announced a substantive rule of constitutional law” under Teague v. Lane, 

489 U.S. 288 (1989). Id. at *15. Moreover, this Court, in Commonwealth 

v. Secreti, ___ A.3d ___, 2016 WL 513341 ( Pa. Super. Feb. 9, 2016), has 

recently held that Miller and Montgomery afford relief to petitioners whose 

PCRA petitions seeking relief under Miller were on appeal when 

Montgomery was announced. 

In light of the foregoing, we reverse the order dismissing Appellant’s 

PCRA petition and remand for resentencing. 

Order reversed. Case remanded. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 2/19/2016
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2273 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2273

  To ensure that Federal employees will be paid for any period during 
 which they are furloughed as a result of any lapse in appropriations 
                         for fiscal year 1996.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 6, 1995

  Mr. Wynn (for himself and Mr. Mfume) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To ensure that Federal employees will be paid for any period during 
 which they are furloughed as a result of any lapse in appropriations 
                         for fiscal year 1996.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAY FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES.

    Notwithstanding section 1341 of title 31, United States Code, any 
Federal employee who is furloughed as a result of a lapse in 
appropriations for fiscal year 1996 shall be compensated at such 
employee's standard rate of compensation for the period during which 
such employee is so furloughed.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 210.21 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes the compliance criteria concerning the requirements for inspection and testing of railroad equipment or operations covered by the Standards.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2070

AN ACT

To provide for the distribution within the United

film entitled ‘‘Fragile Ring of Life’’.States of the United States Information Agency
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2070

AN ACT

To provide for the distribution within the United States

of the United States Information Agency film entitled

‘‘Fragile Ring of Life’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2070 EH

1 SECTION 1. DISTRIBUTION WITHIN THE UNITED STATES OF

2 UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY FILM

3 ENTITLED ‘‘FRAGILE RING OF LIFE’’.

4 Notwithstanding section 208 of the Foreign Relations

5 Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1986 and 1987 (22

6 U.S.C. 1461–1(a)) and the second sentence of section 501

7 of the United States Information and Education Exchange

8 Act of 1948 (22 U.S.C. 1461)—

9 (1) the Director of the United States Informa10 tion Agency shall make available to the Archivist of

11 the United States a master copy of the film entitled

12 ‘‘Fragile Ring of Life’’; and

13 (2) upon evidence that necessary United States

14 rights and licenses have been secured and paid for

15 by the person seeking domestic release of the film,

16 the Archivist shall—

17 (A) reimburse the Director for any ex18 penses of the Agency in making that master

19 copy available;

20 (B) deposit that film in the National Ar21 chives of the United States; and

22 (C) make copies of that film available for

23 purchase and public viewing within the United

24 States.
3

•HR 2070 EH

1 Any reimbursement to the Director pursuant to this sec2 tion shall be credited to the applicable appropriation of

3 the United States Information Agency.

Passed the House of Representatives October 17,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.