alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: martinhetz@comcast.net [mailto:martinhetz@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:24 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Martin Hetz 

2004 SE 58th Ave 

Portlnad, OR 97215
EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Indiana Federal  Corporation of our report dated February 28, 1997,  included
in the 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders of Indiana Federal Corporation.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33- 66618)  pertaining to the 1986 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
of Indiana  Federal  Corporation  of our report dated  February  28, 1997,  with
respect to the consolidated  financial statements of Indiana Federal Corporation
incorporated  by reference  in the Annual  Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1996.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 26, 1997
-----Original Message----- 

From: pakurtzpt@cox.net [mailto:pakurtzpt@cox.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:57 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Pat Kurtz 

1340 E. SHEENA DR. 

Phoenix, AZ 85022
-----Original Message----- 

From: ethels@sonic.net [mailto:ethels@sonic.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:05 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ethel Schy 

1306 15th Street 

Santa Rosa, CA 95404
-----Original Message----- 

From: sgdodson@hotmail.com [mailto:sgdodson@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:33 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sara Dodson 

7 School Lane 

Chester, CT 06412
-----Original Message----- 

From: patkgraham@comcast.net [mailto:patkgraham@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:54 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Patricia Graham 

1403 Crane Brook Way 

Peabody, MA 01960
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 25, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-644 Lower Tribunal No. F01-25909

________________ 

### Robert Jackson, a/k/a Eldwin Gelin,

Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(3) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Teresa Pooler, Judge. O’Brien Hatfield Reese P.A., and Rachael E. Reese (Tampa), for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before LOGUE, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Jones v. State, 591 So. 2d 911, 915 (Fla. 1991) (“[I]n order to provide relief, the newly discovered evidence must be of such nature that it would probably

produce an acquittal on retrial.”); Jones v. State, 709 So. 2d 512, 521 (Fla. 1998) (“[T]he trial court should initially consider whether the evidence would have been admissible at trial or whether there would have been any evidentiary bars to its admissibility.”); Blanco v. State, 702 So. 2d 1250, 1252 (Fla. 1997) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Demps v. State, 462 So. 2d 1074, 1075 (Fla. 1984)) (“As long as the trial court’s findings are supported by competent substantial evidence, ‘this Court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court on questions of fact, likewise of the credibility of the witnesses as well as the weight to be given to the evidence by the trial court.’”); Marek v. State, 14 So. 3d 985, 995 (Fla. 2009) (holding declarant’s statement not so far contrary to his pecuniary or proprietary interest when made many years after trial and statute of limitations had run); § 90.804(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“‘Unavailability as a witness’ means that the declarant: . . . Persists in refusing to testify concerning the subject matter of the declarant’s statement despite an order of the court to do so . . . .”); § 90.804(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (“A statement tending to expose the declarant to criminal liability and offered to exculpate the3

accused is inadmissible, unless corroborating circumstances show the trustworthiness of the statement.”).
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 28, 1995 (88), Para 88.45 Recorded Vote]
[Pages 1063-1064]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.88.45  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment, as modified, submitted by Mr. 
SOUDER:

       Page 78, after line 6, insert the following:

                   limitation on assistance to mexico

       Sec. 564. (a) In General.--None of the funds appropriated 
     or otherwise made available by this Act may be obligated or 
     expended for the Government of Mexico, except

[[Page 1064]]

     if it is made known to the Federal entity or official to 
     which funds are appropriated under this Act that--
       (1) the Government of Mexico is taking actions to reduce 
     the amount of illegal drugs entering the United States from 
     Mexico as determined by the Director of the Office of 
     National Drug Control Policy; and
       (2) the Government of Mexico--
       (A) is taking effective actions to apply vigorously all law 
     enforcement resources to investigate, track, capture, 
     incarcerate, and prosecute illegal drug kingpins and their 
     accomplices, individuals responsible for, or otherwise 
     involved in, corruption, and individuals involved in money-
     laundering; and
       (B) is pursuing international anti-drug trafficking 
     initiatives.

It was decided in the

Yeas

411

affirmative

Nays

0
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, July 28, 1995 (104), Para 104.7 Messages from the President]
[Page 1215]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.104.7  messages from the president

  Sundry messages in writing from the President of the United States 
were communicated to the House by Mr. McCathran, one of his secretaries. 

  The Committee resumed its sitting; and after some further time spent 
therein,
```
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2066

AN ACT

To amend the National School Lunch Act to prolunch and school breakfast programs. tary Guidelines for Americans under the school vide greater flexibility to schools to meet the Die-
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2066

AN ACT

To amend the National School Lunch Act to provide greater

flexibility to schools to meet the Dietary Guidelines for

Americans under the school lunch and school breakfast

programs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2066 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Healthy Meals for

3 Children Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. INCREASED FLEXIBILITY FOR SCHOOLS TO MEET

5 THE DIETARY GUIDELINES FOR AMERICANS

6 UNDER THE NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH ACT.

7 Section 9(f)(2) of the National School Lunch Act (42

8 U.S.C. 1758(f)(2)) is amended by striking subparagraph

9 (D) and inserting the following:

10 ‘‘(D) USE OF ANY REASONABLE APPROACH.—

11 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—A school food service au12 thority may use any reasonable approach, within

13 guidelines established by the Secretary in a timely

14 manner, to meet the requirements of this paragraph,

15 including—

16 ‘‘(I) using the school nutrition meal pat17 tern in effect for the 1994–1995 school year;

18 and

19 ‘‘(II) using any of the approaches de20 scribed in subparagraph (C).

21 ‘‘(ii) NUTRIENT ANALYSIS.—The Secretary may

22 not require a school to conduct or use a nutrient
3

•HR 2066 EH

1 analysis to meet the requirements of this para2 graph.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
II

Calendar No. 239

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2204

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 14, 1995

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To extend and reauthorize the Defense Production Act of

1950, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defense Production

5 Act Amendments of 1995’’.
2

HR 2204 PCS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS.

2 Section 717(a) of the Defense Production Act of

3 1950 (50 U.S.C. App. 2166(a)) is amended in the first

4 sentence by striking ‘‘Title I (except section 104), title III,

5 and title VII (except sections 708, 714, 719, and 721)

6 of this Act, and all authority conferred thereunder shall

7 terminate at the close of September 30, 1995’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘Title I (except section 104), title III, and title VII

9 (except sections 708 and 721), and all authority conferred

10 thereunder, shall terminate at the close of September 30,

11 1998’’.

12 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZING APPROPRIATIONS FOR TITLE III

13 PROJECTS.

14 Section 711 of the Defense Production Act of 1950

15 (50 U.S.C. App. 2161) is amended—

16 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘(a) AUTHOR17 IZATION.—’’ and all that follows through ‘‘sub18 section (c),,’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—

19 Except as provided in subsection (b),’’; and

20 (2) by striking subsections (b), (c), and (d) and

21 inserting after subsection (a) the following new sub22 section:

23 ‘‘(b) TITLE III AUTHORIZATION.—There are author24 ized to be appropriated for each of the fiscal years 1996,

25 1997, and 1998, such sums as may be necessary to carry

26 out title III.’’.
3

HR 2204 PCS

1 SEC. 4. REPORTS TO THE CONGRESS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President shall prepare and

3 transmit to the Committee on Banking and Financial

4 Services of the House of Representatives and the Commit5 tee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate

6 an interim report and a final report on proposed legislative

7 modernization of the authorities contained in the Defense

8 Production Act of 1950.

9 (b) TIMING.—The President shall so transmit—

10 (1) the interim report required by subsection

11 (a), not later than January 31, 1997; and

12 (2) the final report required by subsection (a),

13 not later than September 30, 1997.

Passed the House of Representatives November 13,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Calendar No. 239

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2204

AN ACT

To extend and reauthorize the Defense Production

Act of 1950, and for other purposes.

NOVEMBER 14, 1995

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.367 Service lines: General requirements for connections to main piping. ( a ) *Location.* Each service line connection to a main must be located at the top of the main or, if that is not practical, at the side of the main, unless a suitable protective device is installed to minimize the possibility of dust and moisture being carried from the main into the service line.
( b ) *Compression-type connection to main.* Each compression-type service line to main connection must: ( 1 ) Be designed and installed to effectively sustain the longitudinal pull-out or thrust forces caused by contraction or expansion of the piping, or by anticipated external or internal loading;
( 2 ) If gaskets are used in connecting the service line to the main connection fitting, have gaskets that are compatible with the kind of gas in the system; and
( 3 ) If used on pipelines comprised of plastic, be a Category 1 connection as defined by a listed specification for the applicable material, providing a seal plus resistance to a force on the pipe joint equal to or greater than that which will cause no less than 25% elongation of pipe, or the pipe fails outside the joint area if tested in accordance with the applicable standard.
[35 FR 13257, Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 192-75, 61 FR 18517, Apr. 26, 1996; Amdt. 192-124, 83 FR 58719, Nov. 20, 2018]
-----Original Message----- 

From: snspaid@aol.com [mailto:snspaid@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:24 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

S Turitto 

1522 Old Creek Ct. 

Cardiff,, CA 92007
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 6, 2013

Order 

Clerk

November 6, 2013

146824(85)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 146824

v COA: 302132

Wayne CC: 06-008265-FH

CARL JESSE HOUGH,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time 

for filing an answer to defendant-appellant’s application for leave to appeal is 

GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if it is filed on or before 

January 8, 2014.
###### Editorial Note on Part 195

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.10 Responsibility of operator for compliance with this part.

An operator may make arrangements with another person for the performance of any action required by this part. However, the operator is not thereby relieved from the responsibility for compliance with any requirement of this part.
-----Original Message----- 

From: washington.tracy@gmail.com [mailto:washington.tracy@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:42 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Tracy Washington 

1300 Campus Dr. 

Berkeley, CA 94708
#### § 198.11 Grant authority.

The pipeline safety laws (49 U.S.C. 60101 *et seq.*) authorize the Administrator to pay out funds appropriated or otherwise make available up to 80 percent of the cost of the personnel, equipment, and activities reasonably required for each state agency to carry out a safety program for intrastate pipeline facilities under a certification or agreement with the Administrator or to act as an agent of the Administrator with respect to interstate pipeline facilities.

[Amdt. 198-5, 74 FR 62506, Nov. 30, 2009]
-----Original Message----- 

From: r.mcbride2@cox.net [mailto:r.mcbride2@cox.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:50 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Russ McBride 

1013 E. Campus Dr. 

Tempe, AZ 85282
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 45437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3956]



[[Page 45437]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the meeting of 
the President's Cancer Panel.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(9)(B), Title 5 U.S.C., as 
amended, because the premature disclosure of information and the 
discussions would likely to significantly frustrate implementation of 
recommendations.

    Name of Committee: President's Cancer Panel.
    Date: September 10, 2007.
    Open: September 10, 2007, 8 a.m.-4 p.m.
    Agenda: Strategies for Maximizing the Nation's Investment in 
Cancer.
    Place: Marriott Evergreen Conference Center, 4021 Lakeview 
Drive, Stone Mountain, GA 30083.
    Closed: September 10, 2007, 4:30 p.m.-6:30 p.m.
    Agenda: The Panel will discuss potential recommendations from 
current series ``Strategies for Maximizing the Nation's Investment 
in Cancer'' and discuss potential topics for the 2008/2009 series.
    Place: Marriott Evergreen Conference Center, 4021 Lakeview 
Drive, Stone Mountain, GA 30083.
    Contact Person: Abby Sandler, PhD, Executive Secretary, National 
Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 6116, Room 
212, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/451-9399.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the comments to the Contact Person listed on 
this notice. The comments should include the name, address, 
telephone number and, when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/pcp/pcp.htm, where an agenda and 
any additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 8, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-3956 Filed 8-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M