alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending September 14, 2013

|Filer                              | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                
|---------------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|SIMMONS FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION | * 3A3         | Simmons First National Corporation, Pine Bluff, Arkansas, to acquire 100 percent of Metropolitan National Bank, Little Rock, Arkansas. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                         | Not available
|Federal Register:                  | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED  PARTNERSHIP II FOR
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
        

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          70,012 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  156,286 
<ALLOWANCES>                                   146,282 
<INVENTORY>                                          0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               473,200   
<PP&E>                                      10,180,153 
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,077,300  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,825,792 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          733,800 
<BONDS>                                      5,433,678 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                             0 
<OTHER-SE>                                           0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,825,792 
<SALES>                                              0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               964,228 
<CGS>                                                0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  940,716 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               139,740 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             248,701 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (116,228)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  (116,228)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (11.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0 
                                            
        

</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, September 19, 1995 (117), Para 117.30 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1404]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.117.30  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. ARCHER: Committee on Ways and Means. H.R. 2288. A bill 
     to amend part D of title IV of the Social Security Act to 
     extend for 2 years the deadline by which States are required 
     to have in effect an automated data processing and 
     information retrieval system for use in the administration of 
     State plans for child and spousal support (Rept. No. 104-
     250). Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
     State of the Union.
       Mr. McINNIS: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 223. 
     Resolution waiving points of order against the conference 
     report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1817) making 
     appropriations for military construction for the Department 
     of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and 
     for other purposes (Rept. No. 104-251). Referred to the House 
     Calendar.
       Mr. QUILLEN: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 224. 
     Resolution providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 
     2274) to amend title 23, United States Code, to designate the 
     National Highway System, and for other purposes (Rept. No. 
     104-252) Referred to the House Calendar.
       Mr. DIAZ-BALART: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 225. 
     Resolution providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 
     927) to seek international sanctions against the Castro 
     government in Cuba, to plan for the support of a transition 
     government leading to a democratically elected government in 
     Cuba, and for other purposes (Rept. No. 104-253). Referred to 
     the House Calendar.
```
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT M AXIM O B ERREONDO, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. JONATHAN AKANNO, Prison Doctor, Ke rn Va lle y

State Prison, De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 14-15583 D.C . No. 1:11-c v-00432-LJO-DLB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Lawre nc e J. O’ Ne ill, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2015 ** B e fore : TASHIM A , OW ENS, a nd FRIEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. M a xim o B e rre ondo, a

C a lifornia sta

te prisone r, a

ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c o urt’ s sum

m ary judgm e nt in his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c t ion a lle g ing de libe rat e indiffe re nc e to his se rious m e dic a l ne e ds. W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 

# FIL ED N OV 27 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).U.S.C . § 1291. W e re v ie w de n ovo, Toguc hi v . C hung , 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th C ir. 2004), a

nd we a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt be c a

use B e rre ondo fa ile d to ra ise a

ge nuine disputeof m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r de fe nda nt Aka nno wa s de libe rate l y indiffe re nt to his pre ssure sore s . Se e Farme r v . Bre nnan , 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994) (a

prison offic ia l is de libe rate ly indiffe re nt only

if he or she

“ knows of a

n d disre ga

rds a n e xc e ssive risk to inmate he a lth” ); Toguc hi , 391 F.3d at 1057-60 (ne i the r a

diffe re nc e of opinion c o nc e rning the c ourse of tre atm e nt nor ne glige nc e in dia gnosing or tre ating a m e dic a l c ondition a

m ounts to de libe rate indiffe re nc e ); J

ac k son v . Mc Intosh , 90 F.3d 330, 332 (9th C i r. 1996) (a pla i ntiff

“ m ust show tha

t the c ourse of tre atm e nt the doc tor[] c hose wa s m e dic a lly una c c e p ta ble unde r the c irc um s ta

nc e s” ). W e re je c t B e rre ondo’ s unsupporte d c onte ntion tha t the distric t

c ourt did not c onside r the e vide nc e B e rre ondo submitte d in his obje c tions to the m a gistra te judge ’ s findings a

nd re c om m e n dations. W e do not c onside r m atte rs not spe c ific a lly an d distinc tly

ra i se d a nd a rgue d in the ope ning brie f, or a

rgum e nts a

n d a lle g ations ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l. Se e Padge tt v . W

right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). B e rre ondo’ s re que st to beput on pe rm ane nt “ PLU” sta tus, file d on 1 4 - 1 5 5 8 3 2Se pte m

be r 17, 2014, is denie d. AFFIRM E D.

1 4 - 1 5 5 8 3 3
#### § 176.31 Special permits.

If a hazardous material is being transported by vessel under the authority of an exemption or special permit and a copy of the exemption or special permit is required to be on board the vessel, it must be kept with the dangerous cargo manifest.

[70 FR 73165, Dec. 9, 2005]
# Parents' Day, 2007 

On Parents' Day, America honors our mothers and fathers for their extraordinary devotion and for the great sacrifices they make to provide a hopeful and promising future for their children.

The guidance and unconditional love of parents help create a nurturing environment so children can grow and reach their full potential. Parents work to impart to their children the strength and determination to follow their dreams and the courage to do what is right. They shape the character of their children by sharing their wisdom and setting a positive example. As role models, parents also instill the values and principles that help prepare children to be responsible adults and good citizens.

My Administration is committed to strengthening American families by supporting Federal, State, and faith-based and community programs that promote healthy marriages and responsible parenting. Parents are a child's first teachers, and we recognize their critical role in helping children do well in school. My Administration is committed to helping parents and schools ensure that every child has the best opportunity to learn and succeed.

On Parents' Day, we pay tribute to mothers and fathers and celebrate the special bonds of love between parents and their children. We also express our deep gratitude to parents who serve in the Armed Forces and those whose sons and daughters have answered the call to defend our country. Our Nation is grateful for their honorable service and for the sacrifices family members make as their loved ones work to advance the cause of freedom. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States and consistent with Public Law 103-362, as amended, do hereby proclaim Sunday, July 22, 2007, as Parents' Day. I call upon citizens, private organizations, and governmental bodies at all levels to engage in activities and educational efforts that recognize, support, and honor parents, and I encourage American sons and daughters to convey their love, respect, and appreciation to their parents. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twelfth day of July, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07-3485

Billing code 3195-01-P
From: bgascoine@stpaulsumc.com [mailto:bgascoine@stpaulsumc.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:12 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Bruce Gascoine 

174 Dwellington Dr. 

Valencia, PA 16059
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 8, 1995 (112), Para 112.12 Appointment of Conferees--H.R. 1977]
[Page 1321]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.112.12  appointment of conferees--h.r. 1977

  Thereupon, the SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, by 
unanimous consent, announced the appointment of Messrs. Regula, McDade, 
Kolbe, Skeen, Mrs. Vucanovich, Messrs. Taylor of North Carolina, 
Nethercutt, Bunn, Livingston, Yates, Dicks, Bevill, Skaggs, and Obey, as 
managers on the part of the House at said conference.
  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate thereof.
```
#### Mary Renihan, Appellant, v. Martha A. Dennin, Individually and as Executrix, etc., of James Dennin, Deceased, Respondent.

Decree reversed, issues sent for trial at Rensselaer Circuit. Order and issues to be settled by Landon, J., costs to abide event. Opinion bv

Landon, J.
§ 1520.19 Destruction of SSI. ( a ) *DHS.* Subject to the requirements of the Federal Records Act (5 U.S.C. 105), including the duty to preserve records containing documentation of a Federal agency's policies, decisions, and essential transactions, DHS destroys SSI when no longer needed to carry out the agency's function.
( b ) *Other covered persons* — ( 1 ) *In general.* A covered person must destroy SSI completely to preclude recognition or reconstruction of the information when the covered person no longer needs the SSI to carry out transportation security measures.
( 2 ) *Exception.* Paragraph (b)(1) of this section does not require a State or local government agency to destroy information that the agency is required to preserve under State or local law.
-----Original Message----- 

From: kurtkraft@verizon.net [mailto:kurtkraft@verizon.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:50 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher co-payments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kurt Gary 

1618 Stanford St. Unit B 

Santa Monica, CA 90404
#### §§ 199.203-199.205 [Reserved]
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 1162

In re: CAMERON SETH CRAWFORD, a/k/a Cameron G , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 5:14

- cr
- 00164

- BO

- 1 )

Submitted : April 25, 2019 Decided: April 30, 2019

Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Peti tion denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Cameron Seth Crawford , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Cameron Seth Crawford petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order to compel the Government to file a motion. We conclude that Crawford is not entitled to
mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary
circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v.
Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re Murphy

- Brown, LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018)

. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). The relief sought by Crawford is not available by way of mandamus , as Crawford
must first seek relief in the district court . Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the fac ts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
#### Morris ALBERT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 15896.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

July 14, 1958.

Rehearing Denied July 30, 1958.

Morris Albert, appellant, in pro. per.

George M. Yeager, U. S. Atty., Jay A. Rabinowitz, Asst. U. S. Atty., Fairbanks, Alaska, for appellee.

Before FEE, CHAMBERS and BARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted by a jury in the District Court for the District of Alaska, Fourth Judicial Division, for the offense of armed robbery (A.C.L.A.1949, § 65-4-24). On May 21, 1956 a fifteen (15) year sentence was imposed. An appeal from this conviction, filed May 26, 1956, was never perfected. On February 18, 1957 appellant filed a “Petition of Motion to Vacate Sentence” which the district court properly treated as a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. This motion was denied by the district judge on May 28, 1957 after careful consideration and examination of the files and records of the case. Appellant filed on November 5, 1957 a second “Petition to Vacate Sentence.” This petition, improperly filed in the Third Judicial Division, was transferred to the Fourth Division, the sentencing court, and filed therein November 22, 1957. The petition was denied November 27, 1957 upon the authority of 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which provides:

> “ * * * The sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive motions for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner.”

This appeal is from the denial of the second petition for relief under section 2255 (28 U.S.C. § 1291).

Careful consideration of the allegations of error contained in the first and second petitions convinces us that the district judge was correct in his exercise of the discretion granted him by the above quoted provision. The two petitions are, in all material aspects, substantially alike.

Appellant contends that he was entitled to a hearing on the second petition. He is so entitled “unless the motion and the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief.” The latter is the case here.

The decision of the district court is affirmed.
-----Original Message----- 

From: farrell123@windstream.net [mailto:farrell123@windstream.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:03 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sue Farrell 

1620 South Main Street Suite 64 

Laurinburg, NC 28352
-----Original Message----- 

From: roberttstevens@hotmail.com [mailto:roberttstevens@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:38 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Robert Stevens 

P O Box 971 

Spokane, WA 99210
-----Original Message----- 

From: peter@petergdempsey.com [mailto:peter@petergdempsey.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:50 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Peter Dempsey 

1232 North Chicago Avenue 

Arlington Heights, IL 60004
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6369** 

ROOSEVELT CORNELL SANDERS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the We stern District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Glen E. Conrad , District Judge. ( 7:09

- cv - 00026

- gec - mfu )

Submitted : April 22, 2010 Decided: April 28, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge , and KING and AGEE , Circuit Judges.
Affirmed in part; dismissed in pa rt by un published per curiam opinion
. Roosevelt Cornell Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Rick A. Mountcastle, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM : Roosevelt Cornell Sanders, a federal inmate, appeals three district court orders filed as a result of post

- judgment motions in Sanders’ action filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm those orders denying his second and third motions filed under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the reasoning of the district court. See Sanders v. O’Brien , No. 7:09

- cv - 00026

- gec - mfu (W.D. Va. Jan. 20, 2010; Feb. 10, 2010).
Because Sa nders does not need a certificate of appealability to appeal the denial of an order issued in a § 2241 proceeding, we dismiss the appeal from the district court’s order denying a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, we affirm in part and dismiss in part. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
-----Original Message----- 

From: engdeighton@att.net [mailto:engdeighton@att.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:34 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Yvette Deighton 

10 Carefree Place 

Sparks, NV 89441