alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                         638,638
<SECURITIES>                                    76,506
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,866
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    156,834
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               950,029
<PP&E>                                          26,802
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,145,454
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          317,437
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,045
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,810,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,145,454
<SALES>                                        344,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           83,084
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  306,437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 92,341
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    92,341
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
From: dems.lesiz@xemaps.com [mailto:dems.lesiz@xemaps.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:07 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Les Borean 

22628 Nadine Circle Unit B 

Torrance, CA 90505
#### JANE CROSIER, as Administratrix, etc., of MARY PERRY, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*CORNELL STEAMBOAT COMPANY, Appellant.

*Application to a surrogate for letters of administration*— verification *of the petition*— 1878, chap..298, *sec. 2*— .when *the legal appoinment of the officer administering the oath vñll he assumed*— form *of jurat.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial made upon the minutes of 'the justice before whom the action was tried, and also from an order denying a motion to strike out a sum included in the verdict for interest.

The action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages- for the negligent killing of her intestate by the defendant.

The court at General Term said: “The presentation by the plaintiff of the letters of administration issued to her by the surrogate established *prima facie*their validity. *(Belden*v. *Meeker, él*N. Y., 307.)

“ Only the jurisdiction of the surrogate to issue them could be attacked collaterally. (Code Civil Pro., § 2591.) It is objected that the surrogate acquired no jurisdiction, because it does not appear that the petition upon which the same were granted was verified before ‘ an officer duly authorized to administer oaths/ as is required by Laws 1878, chapter 298, section 2, where the surrogate himself does not personally examine, on oath, the applicant. In this case, the petition purports to be verified before c J. P. Cullen, Notary Public.’ It commences thus: ‘ Surrogate’s Court, Ulster county, *ss.*’ Upon the evidence, it is not otherwise apparent that J. P. Cullen was a notary public for the county of Ulster. *216No evidence was given to show that he was not. The surrogate received this petition as a compliance with the statute.

*“JTon constat,*that it was not made and verified in the Surrogate’s Court and under the observation of that officer. Every presumption is in favor of the surrogate having acted rightly.

*“*Besides, it is the practice of the courts to read affidavits purporting to have been taken before an officer authorized by the statutes to administer oaths, upon the jurat or certificate of the officer, if 'within the State, without further authentication.

■ *“*The presumption is that the affidavit was taken within the .limits of his jurisdiction, and- the court will not, in case of a *defacto*officer, inquire into the validity of his appointment in a proceeding to which he is hot a party. *(Parker*v. *Baker,*8 Paige, .428; *Thurman*v. *Cameron,*24 Wend., 87.)

*“*The statute says the petition shall be £ verified.’ No separate affidavit of verification was appended, but a jurat, thus: *‘*Sworn before me, etc.’ The presumption is that the petitioner swore that the petition is true.” , '

*S. L. Stébbms,*for the appellant.

*I). W. Sparling,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Landon, J.;

Learned, P. J., and Boardman, J. concurred.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
#### Prince L. Trapp, appellant, v. Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World, appellee.

Filed June 15, 1918.

No. 19940.

Insurance: Beneficial Societies: Ultra Vires. Tlhe determination of this case is controlled by the rule laid down in *Haner v. Grand Lodge, A. O. V. W„*p. 563, *post.*

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: George A. Day,. Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Vinsonhaler, McGuckin & Caldwell,*for appellant.

*McGilton, Gaines & Smith*and *D. E. Bradshaw, contra.*

Morrissey, C. J.

This is an action in equity brought by plaintiff to compel defendant, a fraternal beneficiary society, to issue and deliver to him a paid-up policy in the sum of $2,000, under the provisions of a by-law of defendant in force at the time the plaintiff became a member of the society. The by-law provided that every person joining the society, after reaching the age of 42 years and remaining a member thereof in good standing for a term of 20 years, “shall not thereafter be required to pay any assessment or dues and shall receive a paid-up certificate, payable at death to his designated beneficiary.” There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

It is admitted that plaintiff fell within the class specified, and remained a member in good standing for the period mentioned, but the answer alleges that defendant was organized under the laws of the state of Nebraska; that under its articles of incorporation it was authorized to create a fund' from which there should be paid upon the death of a member the proceeds of one assessment upon the surviving members, not exceeding the amount designated' in his beneficiary certificate; that defendant had the right to issue benefi*563eiary certificates to its members, the amount thereof to be paid upon the death of a member, but had no right or power to issue any other kind or class of. certificate, and that the society never had the right under the law to issue a paid-up certificate; and that the by-law relied upon is *ultra vires.*There are other allegations in the answer, but it is unnecessary to set them out.

The main questions presented have been determined adversely to plaintiff in the case of *Haner v. Grand Lodge, A. O. U. W.,*p. 563, *post, , and*on the authority thereof the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, W. Douglas Parker, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of US Airways Group, Inc. (the “Company”) and Derek J. Kerr, the Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, to whichthis certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 9th day of November 2005.     /s/ W. Douglas Parker        W. Douglas Parker
From: jrrpay@aol.com [mailto:jrrpay@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:15 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

JERRY PAYNE 

69 FAIRPLAIN MOBILE HOME PARK 

RIPLEY, WV 25271
§ 172.308 Authorized abbreviations. ( a ) Abbreviations may not be used in a proper shipping name marking except as authorized in this section.
( b ) The abbreviation “ORM” may be used in place of the words “Other Regulated Material.”
( c ) Abbreviations which appear as authorized descriptions in column 2 of the § 172.101 table (e.g., “TNT” and “PCB”) are authorized.
[Amdt. 172-123, 55 FR 52591, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended by Amdt. 172-145, 60 FR 49110, Sept. 21, 1995]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, July 18, 1995 (96), Para 96.21 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1147]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.96.21  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. KLUG:

       On page 44, after line 19, insert the following:
       ``Sec. 115. No funds appropriated or otherwise made 
     available pursuant to this Act in fiscal year 1996 shall be 
     obligated or expended to accept or process applications for a 
     patent for any mining or mill site claim located under the 
     general mining laws or to issue a patent for any such 
     claim.''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

271

affirmative

Nays

153
```
|EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|Connecticut Valley Electric Company Inc. (a) (F1)

Vermont Electric Power Company, Inc. (b) (F2)

C.V. Realty, Inc. (a) (F1)

Central Vermont Public Service Corporation -
   East Barnet Hydroelectric, Inc. (a) (F1)

Custom Investment Corporation (a) (F1)

Catamount Resources Corporation (a) (F1)

Catamount Energy Corporation (a)(c) (F1)

Eversant Corporation (a)(d) (F1)
|- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|(FN)
(F1)

(F2)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1991 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1991

   To change the authorized depth for the project for navigation at 
          Manistique Harbor, Michigan, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 1995

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To change the authorized depth for the project for navigation at 
          Manistique Harbor, Michigan, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAVIGATION PROJECT AT MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MICHIGAN.

    (a) Sand and Stone Cap.--The project for navigation, Manistique 
Harbor, Schoolcraft County, Michigan, authorized by the first section 
of the Act entitled ``An Act making appropriations for the 
construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works on 
rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved March 3, 1905 
(33 Stat. 1136), is modified to permit installation of a sand and stone 
cap over sediments affected by polychlorinated biphenyls in accordance 
with an administrative order of the Environmental Protection Agency.
    (b) Project Depth.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
        project described in subsection (a) is modified to provide for 
        an authorized depth of 18 feet.
            (2) Exception.--The authorized depth shall be 12.5 feet in 
        the areas where the sand and stone cap described in subsection 
        (a) will be placed within the following coordinates: 4220N-
        2800E to 4220N-3110E to 3980N-3260E to 3190N-3040E to 2960N-
        2560E to 3150N-2300E to 3680N-2510E to 3820N-2690E and back to 
        4220N-2800E.
    (c) Harbor of Refuge.--The project described in subsection (a), 
including the breakwalls, pier, and authorized depth of the project (as 
modified by subsection (b)), shall continue to be maintained as a 
harbor of refuge.
                                 <all>
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: sharyn.tams@moffitt.org [mailto:sharyn.tams@moffitt.org] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:25 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sharyn Tams 

2401 Bayshore Blvd., #607 

Tampa, FL 33629
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 7, 1995 (111), Para 111.37 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1317]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.111.37  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under Clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. LINDER: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 215. 
     Resolution providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 
     1594) to place restrictions on the promotion by the 
     Department of Labor and other Federal agencies and 
     instrumentalities of economically targeted investments in 
     connection with employee benefit plans (Rept. No. 104-240). 
     Referred to the House Calendar.
       Mr. GOSS: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 216. 
     Resolution providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 
     1655) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1996 for 
     intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the U.S. 
     Government, the Community Management Account, and Central 
     Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for 
     other purposes (Rept. No. 104-241). Referred to the House 
     Calendar.
```
#### § 211.27 Publication of adopted rules and withdrawal of notices.

Whenever the Administrator adopts a final rule or withdraws an advance notice or notice of proposed rulemaking, the final rule or a notice of withdrawal is published in the Federal Register.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTREACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF PAULSON CAPITAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY AS OF MARCH
31, 2000 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS IN THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             262
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,379
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                              1,749
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                             30,767
<PP&E>                                             535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,548
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                      19,169
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                  65
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           732
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,793
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,548
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                  832
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                                20
<COMMISSIONS>                                    6,348
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                       16
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<COMPENSATION>                                   8,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,184
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      15,184
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,111
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.57


</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: mgfarreras@hotmail.com [mailto:mgfarreras@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:48 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Marilyn G. Farreras 

51 Leroy St. 

New York, MD 20853
----

| EXHIBIT      23.3 Consent      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The      Stockholder and Board of DirectorsVermont      Electric Power Company, Inc. as Manager of Vermont Transco      LLC: We      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement      (Nos. 333-141681 and 333-151019) on Form S-3 and the      registration statement (Nos. 333-102008 and 333-152872) on      Form S-8 of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation of our report      dated March 3, 2009, with respect to the balance sheets of Vermont      Transco LLC as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related      statements of income, changes in members’ equity, and cash flows for the      years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and for the period from      June 30, 2006 (date of inception) to December 31, 2006, which      report appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report on      Form 10-K of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation. /s/      KPMG LLP  Burlington,      VermontMarch 10,      2009   Vt.      Reg. No. 92-0000241 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
-----Original Message----- 

From: ztpage@mtu.edu [mailto:ztpage@mtu.edu] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:51 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Zachary Page 

1700 Townsend Dr. (DHH) Rm# 232 

Houghton, MI 49931