Opinion issued January 30, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00822-CV

——————————

SHARON YASIN, Appellant

V.

HARRIS COUNTY CIVIL COURTS AT LARGE COURT 1, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1204306

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Sharon Yasin, acting pro se, attempts to appeal from the trial 

court’s September 15, 2023 order of dismissal. Appellant has been declared a 

vexatious litigant and is the subject of a pre-filing order, signed on August 23, 2023, 

in Sharon Yasin v. Harris County Civil Courts at Large Court 1, et al., Cause No. 
2

1204306, in the County Court at Law No. 1, of Harris County, Texas. See Office of 

Court Administration List of Vexatious Litigants Subject to a Prefiling Order under 

Chapter 11 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code, available at 

www.txcourts.gov/judicial-data/vexatious-litigants.aspx (last viewed on Dec. 22, 

2023); see also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 11.104(b) (requiring Office of 

Court Administration to maintain and post list of vexatious litigants on agency’s 

website); Johnson v. Marsh, No. 02-13-00406-CV, 2014 WL 982377, at *1 n.2 (Tex. 

App.—Fort Worth Mar. 13, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.) (taking judicial notice of list 

of vexatious litigants maintained by Office of Court Administration). The pre-filing 

order prohibits Appellant from filing, pro se, new litigation without seeking the 

permission of an appropriate local administrative judge. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. &

REM. CODE §§ 11.101, 11.102. 

The Clerk of this Court may not file an appeal presented by a vexatious 

litigant subject to a pre-filing order unless the litigant first obtains an order from

the appropriate local administrative judge permitting the filing or the appeal is from

a pre-filing order designating the person a vexatious litigant. See TEX. CIV. PRAC.

& REM. CODE § 11.103(a). Appellant is not appealing from a pre-filing order

designating her a vexatious litigant. See id. § 11.103(d). Appellant may thus not 

proceed with her appeal unless the appropriate local administrative judge permitted 

her filing. See id. § 11.103(a).
3

On January 4, 2024, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that this appeal 

was subject to dismissal unless she responded within ten days with proof that, before 

filing her appeal, she obtained an order from the appropriate local administrative 

judge permitting her appeal. In response to the notice, Appellant did not produce an 

order permitting the filing of her appeal or otherwise adequately respond. 

Additionally, the clerk’s record is devoid of any order permitting the filing of this 

appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id. § 11.1035(b); TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(a); Johnson v. Parker, No. 03-19-00067-CV, 2019 WL 3922908, at *1 (Tex. 

App.—Austin Aug. 20, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing vexatious litigant’s 

appeal in absence of order from local administrative judge permitting filing of 

appeal); Johnson v. Hughey, No. 06-12-00079-CV, 2012 WL 4761546, at *1 (Tex. 

App.—Texarkana Oct. 5, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.) (same). 

All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Landau and Rivas-Molloy.