alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Bell Atlantic - Washington, D.C., Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 33-53234) of our
report dated February 5, 1997, which includes an explanatory paragraph stating
that the Company changed its method of accounting for directory publishing
revenue and expenses in 1996 and  discontinued accounting for its operations in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 71, "Accounting
for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation," effective August 1, 1994, on
our audits of the financial statements and financial statement schedule of the
Company as of December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1995, and for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1996, which report is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



2400 Eleven Penn Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 25, 1997
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 20, 1995 (98), Para 98.8 MFN--China]
[Page 1162]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.98.8  mfn--china

  Mr. ARCHER, pursuant to House Resolution 193, called up the joint 
resolution (H.J. Res. 96) disapproving extension of most favored nation 
status to the products of China.
  When said joint resolution was considered and read twice.
  After debate,
  Pursuant to sections 152 and 153 of the Trade Act of 1974, the 
previous question was considered as ordered.
  Mr. WOLF, pursuant to House Resolution 193, moved to lay the joint 
resolution on the table.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House lay on the table said joint resolution?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EMERSON, announced that the yeas had it.
  Mr. LANTOS objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  A quorum not being present,
  The roll was called under clause 4, rule XV, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

Yeas

321

When there appeared

Nays

107
```
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending March 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Neal
Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc., general
partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., General Partner of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



/s/  Neal Ludeke
-----------------------------
by: Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Richman
Tax Credit Properties Inc., general
partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties
L.P., General Partner of the Company
July 13, 2004
-----Original Message----- 

From: rtaylor@ufl.edu [mailto:rtaylor@ufl.edu] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:08 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Robyn Taylor 

15301 nw 188 street 

Alachua, FL 32615
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VICORP
RESTAURANTS, INC. BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AS OF APRIL 18,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-18-1999
<CASH>                                          10,880
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,093
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,694
<PP&E>                                         305,926
<DEPRECIATION>                                 172,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 199,136
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,141
<BONDS>                                          4,936
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           447
<OTHER-SE>                                     140,450
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   199,136
<SALES>                                        164,467
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               165,947
<CGS>                                           50,999
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,999
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,259
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 474
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,443
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,082
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,361
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,361
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .59
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.507 Test requirements for pipelines to operate at a hoop stress less than 30 percent of SMYS and at or above 100 p.s.i. (689 kPa) gage. Except for service lines and plastic pipelines, each segment of a pipeline that is to be operated at a hoop stress less than 30 percent of SMYS and at or above 100 p.s.i. (689 kPa) gage must be tested in accordance with the following: ( a ) The pipeline operator must use a test procedure that will ensure discovery of all potentially hazardous leaks in the segment being tested.
( b ) If, during the test, the segment is to be stressed to 20 percent or more of SMYS and natural gas, inert gas, or air is the test medium— ( 1 ) A leak test must be made at a pressure between 100 p.s.i. (689 kPa) gage and the pressure required to produce a hoop stress of 20 percent of SMYS; or
( 2 ) The line must be walked to check for leaks while the hoop stress is held at approximately 20 percent of SMYS.
( c ) The pressure must be maintained at or above the test pressure for at least 1 hour.
( d ) For fabricated units and short sections of pipe, for which a post installation test is impractical, a preinstallation pressure test must be conducted in accordance with the requirements of this section.
[35 FR 13257, Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 192-58, 53 FR 1635, Jan. 21, 1988; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37504, July 13, 1998; 86 FR 2241, Jan. 21, 2021; 86 FR 12836, Mar. 5, 2021]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1902 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1902

 To remove the New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit Superfund Site from 
  the National Priorities List under the Comprehensive Environmental 
           Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 1995

   Mr. Rose introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
      Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
  Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To remove the New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit Superfund Site from 
  the National Priorities List under the Comprehensive Environmental 
           Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF SITE FROM NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST.

    The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall 
remove the New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit Superfund Site, North 
Carolina, from the National Priorities List under the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 and, 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, may not include such Site 
on such List again.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 3(b)
                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                       RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                         CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY

Pursuant  to  the  provisions  of  the  Texas  Business   Corporation  Act,  the
undersigned  corporation  hereby amends its Articles of  Incorporation,  and for
that purpose, submits the following statement:

1. The name of the corporation is: Central Power and Light Company.

2. Article I of the Restated  Articles of  Incorporation is hereby amended so as
to read as  follows:  The name of the  Corporation  shall be AEP  Texas  Central
Company.

3. The date of adoption of each amendment is: December 11, 2002.

4. The number of shares of the  corporation  outstanding at the time of adoption
of the  amendment  was  2,217,629,  and the  number of shares  entitled  to vote
thereon was 2,211,678.

5. The  designation  and  number of  outstanding  shares of each class or series
entitled to vote thereon as a class were as follows

Class or Series                Number of Outstanding Shares and Entitled to Vote

Common Stock                                    2,211,678

Preferred                                           5,941

6.  The  Number  of  shares  of the  corporation  voted  for the  amendment  was
2,211,678.

The  number  of shares of each  class or series  entitled  to vote as a class or
series voted for or against such amendment was as follows:

Class or Series            Number of Shares                   Number of Shares
                              Voted For                         Voted Against

Common Stock                  2,211,678                              0

7. The  foregoing  amendment  will not  effect a change in the  amount of stated
capital of the corporation.


Date     December 18, 2002
    --------------------------------

                                      s/s Thomas V. Shockley, III
                                      ----------------------------------
                                      Thomas V. Shockley, III,
                                      Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Brunner
Companies Income Properties L.P. I's 1995 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000830737
<NAME> BRUNNER COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES L.P. I
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         315,770
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  126,455
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      25,028,491
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,027,173
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,662,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     19,205,210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,264,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,662,280
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,489,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,799,896
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,785,179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (310,896)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# About STI Statistics

## About

CDC's primary publications for STI statistics include an annual report and two supplements.

## Resources

Sexually Transmitted Infections Surveillance, 2022
Jan. 29, 2024

Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP) Profiles
July 22, 2024

Syphilis Surveillance Supplemental Slides
Jan. 30, 2024

Inquiries
July 11, 2024

### STI Case Definitions

A surveillance case definition is a set of uniform criteria used to define a disease for public health surveillance. Surveillance case definitions enable public health officials to classify and count cases consistently across reporting jurisdictions. 

### AtlasPlus

NCHHSTP AtlasPlus is an interactive tool that gives users the ability to create customized tables, maps, and charts using nearly 20 years of CDC's surveillance data on HIV, viral hepatitis, STD, and TB. AtlasPlus also provides access to indicators on social determinants of health (SDOH) allowing users to view social and economic data in conjunction with surveillance data for each disease.

SourcesPrintShare

FacebookLinkedInTwitterSyndicate

National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and Tuberculosis PreventionAbout Division of STD Prevention
```

[House Document 112-159]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

112th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - House Document 112-159
 
   A REPORT ON THE SECURITY SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                     THEPRESIDENTOFTHEUNITEDSTATES

                              transmitting

A LETTER REGARDING THE DETERIORATING SECURITY SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL 
   AFRICAN REPUBLIC AND THE POTENTIAL THREAT TO U.S. CITIZENS, U.S. 
EMBASSY PERSONNEL AND SEVERAL PRIVATE U.S. CITIZENS THAT WERE EVACUATED 
FROM BANGUI, CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC ON DECEMBER 27, 2012 AND A STAND-
  BY RESPONSE AND EVACUATION FORCE OF APPROXIMATELY 50 U.S. MILITARY 
                               PERSONNEL

 December 30, 2012.--Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 
                         ordered to be printed
                                           The White House,
                                     Washington, December 29, 2012.
Hon. John Boehner,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: Due to the deteriorating security 
situation in the Central African Republic and the potential 
threat to U.S. citizens, U.S. embassy personnel and several 
private U.S. citizens were evacuated from Bangui, Central 
African Republic on December 27, 2012. In addition, at 
approximately 5:20 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on December 27, a 
stand-by response and evacuation force of approximately 50 U.S. 
military personnel from U.S. Africa Command deployed to Chad to 
support the evacuation of U.S. embassy personnel and U.S. 
citizens from the Central African Republic. Although equipped 
for combat, this stand-by security force was deployed solely 
for the purpose of protecting U.S. citizens and property, if 
necessary, until the U.S. embassy personnel and private U.S. 
citizens have been safely evacuated from the Central African 
Republic.
    This action has been directed consistent with my 
responsibility to protect U.S. citizens both at home and 
abroad, and in furtherance of U.S. national security and 
foreign policy interests, pursuant to my constitutional 
authority to conduct U.S. foreign relations and as Commander in 
Chief and Chief Executive.
    I am providing this report as part of my efforts to keep 
the Congress fully informed, consistent with the War Powers 
Resolution (Public Law 93-148). I appreciate the support of the 
Congress in this action.
            Sincerely,
                                                      Barack Obama.

                                  

```
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Theodore F. Miller et al., as Executors of Mary F. Farnham, Deceased, Appellants. Mary E. Truslow, Appellant. Levi G. Farnham et al., Appellants and Respondents. Stephen H. Farnham, Individually and as Administrator with the Will Annexed of Stephen H. Farnham, Deceased, Respondent.

*Matter of Miller,*138 App. Div. 885, affirmed.

(Argued September 27, 1910;

decided October 11, 1910.)

Cross-appeals from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 22, 1910, which modified and affirmed as modified a decree of the Kings County Court settling the accounts of the executors of Mary F. Farnham, deceased, as executrix of Stephen H. Farnham, deceased.

*Charles H. Studin*and *William Heed a*for Levi G. Farnham et al., appellants and respondents.

*Henry W. Jessup*for Máry E. Truslow, appellant.

*Axigustus Van Wyck*for respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur; Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
-----Original Message----- 

From: conniebwarner@gmail.com [mailto:conniebwarner@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:07 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Connie Warner 

670 Wishart Rd. 

Kalispell, MT 59901
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, May 1, 1995 (59), Para 59.3 After Recess--2:00 P.M.]
[Page 605]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.59.3  after recess--2:00 p.m.

  The SPEAKER called the House to order.
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1660

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the marriage

penalty under the one-time exclusion of gain on the sale of a principal

residence by an individual who has attained age 55.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 17, 1995

Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate

the marriage penalty under the one-time exclusion of

gain on the sale of a principal residence by an individual

who has attained age 55.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF MARRIAGE PENALTY UNDER

4 ELECTION OF ONE-TIME EXCLUSION OF GAIN

5 FROM SALE OF PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE BY AN

6 INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS ATTAINED AGE 55.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 121 of

8 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to one-time
2

•HR 1660 IH

1 exclusion of gain from sale of principal residence by an

2 individual who has attained age 55) is amended by redes3 ignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4) and by inserting

4 after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph:

5 ‘‘(3) DISREGARD OF CERTAIN ELECTIONS.—For

6 purposes of applying paragraph (2) to individuals

7 who are married to each other, an election by one

8 individual with respect to—

9 ‘‘(A) a sale or exchange occurring before

10 the date of the marriage, or

11 ‘‘(B) a sale or exchange occurring on or

12 after such date of property owned by such indi13 vidual before such date,

14 shall be disregarded for purposes of determining

15 whether an election may be made by the other indi16 vidual with respect to property owned by such other

17 individual before such date. A separate limitation

18 under paragraph (1) shall be allowed with respect to

19 each election which may be made by reason of this

20 paragraph.’’

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

22 subsection (a) shall apply for purposes of determining

23 whether an election may be made under section 121 of
3

•HR 1660 IH

1 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to a sale

2 or exchange occurring on or after January 1, 1995.

Æ
-----Original Message----- 

From: oneqadfae1@msn.com [mailto:oneqadfae1@msn.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:22 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

dawn walko 

482 luther street sw 

cedar rapids, IA 52404