alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.575 Which facilities must I electrically isolate and what inspections, tests, and safeguards are required? ( a ) You must electrically isolate each buried or submerged pipeline from other metallic structures, unless you electrically interconnect and cathodically protect the pipeline and the other structures as a single unit.
( b ) You must install one or more insulating devices where electrical isolation of a portion of a pipeline is necessary to facilitate the application of corrosion control.
( c ) You must inspect and electrically test each electrical isolation to assure the isolation is adequate.
( d ) If you install an insulating device in an area where a combustible atmosphere is reasonable to foresee, you must take precautions to prevent arcing.
( e ) If a pipeline is in close proximity to electrical transmission tower footings, ground cables, or counterpoise, or in other areas where it is reasonable to foresee fault currents or an unusual risk of lightning, you must protect the pipeline against damage from fault currents or lightning and take protective measures at insulating devices.
#### Ellinwood *v.*Holt.

An attachment of mortgaged personal property by the holder of the mortgage, in an action founded in part upon a note for which the mortgage is held as collateral security, which is defeated by forcible seizure of the property by an officer claiming it under a prior attachment, is not a waiver of the mortgage as to such prior attachment.

Trover, for two horses, two harnesses, and a wagon. Facts found by a referee. June 26. 1878, H. F. Marcy mortgaged the propert}*- in controversy to W. S. Bonney to secure a note for $260, and the mortgage was duly recorded. June 27, 1878, Bonney indorsed the Marcy note, and delivered it with the mortgage to the plaintiff to secure his note to the plaintiff for $100 borrowed money. August 10, 1878, the mortgaged property, then being in Bonney’s possession in a stable occupied by him in Keene, was attached by the defendant, as sheriff of Cheshire county, on a writ in favor of one Nichols against Bonney, and left in the stable in charge oí a keeper. August 18, 1878, the plaintiff, having a writ against Bonney founded upon the $100 note, and a note of an earlier date for $850, and having also the mortgage from Marcy to Bonney in his possession, entered the stable in the absence of the defendant’s keeper1, the door being unfastened, with an officer, who attached the property on the plaintiff’s writ and placed the plaintiff in possession as keeper. The plaintiff' remained in possession until the next day when he was ejected by the defendant, who took the property from him and subsequently sold it on the execution issued on the judgment recovered by Nichols against Bonney. The plaintiff’s action against Bonney was entered in court and defaulted, but no judgment was ever entered up or execution issued.

*Morrison Bartlett,*for the plaintiff.

*58
      *J. B. Andrews*and *B. E.*Burnham, for the defendant.

Clark, J.

The plaintiff’s title under the Marcy mortgage is valid against the defendant’s attachment. The objection, that the plaintiff, by attaching the property, waived his rights under the mortgage, is not open to the defendant. Whatever may be- the effect of an attachment of mortgaged personal property by the holder of the mortgage in ordinary cases *(Haynes*v. Sanborn, 45 N. H. 429, and *Evans*v. *Warren,*122 Mass. 303), the defendant, having elected to treat the plaintiff’s attempted attachment as a nullity and forcibly taken possession and sold the property, cannot afterwards insist on the attachment as valid to defeat the mortgage. Big. Est. (3d ed.) 562; *Butler*v. Hildreth, 5 Met. 49; *Scholey*v. *Rew,*23 Wall. 331.

*Judgment for the plaintiff on the report.*

Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending November 16, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                           | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------------------ | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|FIRST CITIZENS CMNTY BK, MANSFIELD, PENNSYLVANIA | 978118 | 06/24/2013 | 11/07/2013     | S         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
-----Original Message----- 

From: kmt5982@hotmail.com [mailto:kmt5982@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:04 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kathleen Truesdell 

140 S. Mansfield 

Ypsilanti, MI 48197
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1365

In Re: CHRISTOPHER LEE NEAL, 

 Petitioner. 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(2:94-cr-00300-JAB-2; 1:08-cv-00458-JAB-WWD) 

Submitted: July 21, 2009 Decided: August 5, 2009 

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Christopher Lee Neal, Petitioner Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Christopher Lee Neal petitions for a writ of mandamus, 

alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 

habeas petition. He seeks an order from this court directing 

the district court to act. We find there has been no undue 

delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny as moot the motion 

to expedite and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EFRAIN LEON MARTINEZ; PATRICIA

LEON,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-74941

Agency Nos. A095-307-596

 A096-307-599

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 14, 2010** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Efrain Leon Martinez and Patricia Leon, natives and citizens of Mexico,

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying

their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and

FILED

JAN 06 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 06-74941

review de novo questions of law. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92

(9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ April 26, 2006,

motion to reopen on the ground that petitioners were statutorily ineligible for

cancellation of removal because they overstayed their voluntary departure period. 

See 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d). We do not consider petitioners’ contentions regarding

prejudice stemming from alleged ineffective assistance of counsel because

petitioners’ ineligibility for cancellation based on their failure to depart is

dispositive.

Petitioners’ pending motion for a stay of the voluntary departure period is

denied. See Garcia v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1157, 1159-60 (9th Cir. 2004) (order)

(court lacks jurisdiction to grant a voluntary departure stay where the request is

filed after expiration of the voluntary departure period).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# EUR-Lex - 52003XC0711(04) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52003XC0711(04)

**Publication of a request under Article 9 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 to amend one or more parts of the specification of a name registered under Article 17 or Article 6 of that Regulation **

*
Official Journal C 162 , 11/07/2003 P. 0008 - 0009 *

Publication of a request under Article 9 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 to amend one or more parts of the specification of a name registered under Article 17 or Article 6 of that Regulation

(2003/C 162/05)

Publication confers the right to object within the meaning of Article 7 and 12d of the Regulation. Any objections to this request must be forwarded via the competent authority of a Member State, a WTO Member country or a third country recognised under Article 12(3) within six months of the publication date.

The amendment is not a minor one and it must therefore be published under Article 6(2) of the Regulation.

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 2081/92

APPLICATION TO AMEND A SPECIFICATION: ARTICLE 9

1. Registered name: "Siurana"

2. Responsible department in the Member State: Name: Subdirección General de Denominaciones de Calidad y Relaciones Interprofesionales y Contractuales

Dirección General de Alimentación

Subsecretaría de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación del Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación

Address: Paseo Infanta Isabel, 1 - E-28071 Madrid

Telephone: (34) 913 47 53 94

Fax: (34) 913 47 54 10.

3. Amendment(s) requested: - specification heading:

[square ] name

[square ] description

>PIC FILE= "C_2003162EN.000802.TIF">

geographical area

[square ] proof of origin

[square ] method of production

[square ] link

[square ] labelling

[square ] national requirements

- amendment(s):

The geographical area covered by this designation is to be extended to include the following municipalities:

>TABLE>

From the point of view of the link with the environment (historical, soil, relief, and climatic factors), the geographical area to be extended continues to demonstrate a cohesion and degree of homogeneity similar to what it had prior to the requested extension (initial PDO) and fulfils all the basic requirements set out in the specification for this protected designation of origin listed in the Community register, producing an extra virgin olive oil with the same characteristics as the protected olive oil.

4. Date of receipt of the full application: 5.2.2003.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 20, 1995 (83), Para 83.29 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1021]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.83.29  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. FRANK:

       Page 19, after line 12, insert the following new section:
       Sec. 126. The amounts otherwise provided in this Act for 
     the following accounts are hereby reduced by 5 percent:
       (1) ``Military Construction, Army''.
       (2) ``Military Construction, Navy''.
       (3) ``Military Construction, Air Force''.
       (4) ``Military Construction, Defense-wide''.
       (5) ``Military Construction, Army National Guard''.
       (6) ``Military Construction, Air National Guard''.
       (7) ``Military Construction, Army Reserve''.
       (8) ``Military Construction, Naval Reserve''.
       (9) ``Military Construction, Air Force Reserve''.
       (10) ``North Atlantic Treaty Organization--Security 
     Investment Program''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

131

negative

Nays

290
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, August 2, 1995 (107), Para 107.5 Motion to Adjourn]
[Page 1239]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.107.5  motion to adjourn

  Mr. OBEY moved that the House do now adjourn.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House now adjourn?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. DICKEY, announced that the nays had it.
  Mr. OBEY objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  A quorum not being present,
  The roll was called under clause 4, rule XV, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

Yeas

120

Nays

289

When there appeared

Answered present

1
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 174 (Thursday, September 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 55648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23110]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, September 14, 2011; 11 a.m.-12 p.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters. For a recorded message containing the latest agenda 
information, call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: September 6, 2011.
Todd A Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-23110 Filed 9-6-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, September 12, 1995 (113), Para 113.33 Adjournment]
[Page 1329]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.113.33  adjournment

  On motion of Ms. McKINNEY, at 11 o'clock and 2 minutes p.m., the House 
adjourned.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, June 29, 1995 (89), Para 89.29 Further Message from the Senate]
[Page 1085]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.89.29  further message from the senate

  A message from the Senate by Mr. Lundregan, one of its clerks, 
announced that the Senate agrees to the report of the committee of 
conference on the disagreeing votes of two Houses on the amendment of 
the Senate to the resolution (H. Con. Res. 67) ``Concurrent resolution 
setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government 
for the fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002''.
  The message also announced that the Senate had passed a concurrent 
resolution of the following title, in which the concurrence of the House 
is requested:

       S. Con. Res. 20, concurrent resolution providing for a 
     conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate on Thursday, 
     June 29, 1995, or Friday, June 30, 1995, until Monday, July 
     10, 1995, and a conditional adjournment of the House on the 
     legislative day of Friday, June 30, 1995, until Monday, July 
     10, 1995.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                     306,600,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              170,500,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,100,000
<INVENTORY>                                106,700,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           610,900,000
<PP&E>                                     520,400,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             164,700,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,373,200,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      319,900,000
<BONDS>                                    224,400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    17,500,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 534,200,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,373,200,000
<SALES>                                  1,162,000,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,162,000,000
<CGS>                                      907,400,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,122,400,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               900,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          30,400,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            433,200,000
<INCOME-TAX>                               182,400,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        250,800,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               250,800,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      12.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    12.29


</TABLE>
§ 1540.111 Carriage of weapons, explosives, and incendiaries by individuals. ( a ) *On an individual's person or accessible property—prohibitions.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, an individual may not have a weapon, explosive, or incendiary, on or about the individual's person or accessible property— ( 1 ) When performance has begun of the inspection of the individual's person or accessible property before entering a sterile area, or before boarding an aircraft for which screening is conducted under this subchapter;
( 2 ) When the individual is entering or in a sterile area; or
( 3 ) When the individual is attempting to board or onboard an aircraft for which screening is conducted under §§ 1544.201, 1546.201, or 1562.23 of this chapter.
( b ) *On an individual's person or accessible property—permitted carriage of a weapon.* Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply as to carriage of firearms and other weapons if the individual is one of the following: ( 1 ) Law enforcement personnel required to carry a firearm or other weapons while in the performance of law enforcement duty at the airport.
( 2 ) An individual authorized to carry a weapon in accordance with §§ 1544.219, 1544.221, 1544.223, 1546.211, or subpart B of part 1562 of this chapter.
( 3 ) An individual authorized to carry a weapon in a sterile area under a security program.
( c ) *In checked baggage.* A passenger may not transport or offer for transport in checked baggage or in baggage carried in an inaccessible cargo hold under § 1562.23 of this chapter: ( 1 ) Any loaded firearm(s).
( 2 ) Any unloaded firearm(s) unless— ( i ) The passenger declares to the aircraft operator, either orally or in writing, before checking the baggage, that the passenger has a firearm in his or her bag and that it is unloaded;
( ii ) The firearm is unloaded;
( iii ) The firearm is carried in a hard-sided container; and
( iv ) The container in which it is carried is locked, and only the passenger retains the key or combination.
( 3 ) Any unauthorized explosive or incendiary.
( d ) *Ammunition.* This section does not prohibit the carriage of ammunition in checked baggage or in the same container as a firearm. Title 49 CFR part 175 provides additional requirements governing carriage of ammunition on aircraft.
[67 FR 8353, Feb. 22, 2002, as amended at 67 FR 41639, June 19, 2002; 70 FR 41600, July 19, 2005; 71 FR 30507, May 26, 2006]
From: danceyah@comcast.net [mailto:danceyah@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 8:04 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

karen irwin 

1403 sw broadway drive 

portland, OR 97201
-----Original Message----- 

From: cmviolet@gmail.com [mailto:cmviolet@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:59 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Carla Violet 

7289 Wild Currant Way 

Oakland, CA 94611
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 31, 1995 (105), Para 105.13 D.C. Emergency Highway Relief]
[Page 1226]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.105.13  d.c. emergency highway relief

  Mr. SHUSTER moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 2017) 
to authorize an increased Federal share of the costs of certain 
transportation projects in the District of Columbia for fiscal years 
1995 and 1996; as amended.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. COMBEST, recognized Mr. SHUSTER and Mr. 
RAHALL, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill, as amended?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. COMBEST, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said bill, as amended, was passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and 
said bill, as amended, was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the 
table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.
```