alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM – Page 1 

(Electronic Format) 

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District

Rule No(s): N/A Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Adopted September 19, 2006

Rule Title(s): Federal Negative Declarations for 51 Source Categories

Date Submitted to ARB: 10/18/2006

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): N/A

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No (If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Karen K. Nowak Phone Number: (760) 245-1661 x6810 E-mail Address: k2nowak@mdaqmd.ca.gov

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule 

The FNDs were adopted to officially show that no sources of the named types are present within the Antelope 

Valley Air Quality Management District (AVAQMD).

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2 

 (CO) PM TAC (name): 

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission 

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined. 

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A 

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: N/A

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: N/A Area Affected: N/A

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible): 

N/A
 

CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2 

(Electronic Format) 

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and 

planning. 

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split 

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: N/A

Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A% 

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: N/A Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A% 

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as 

necessary): N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No 

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) N/A of the Rule. 

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: N/A

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains: 

Emission Limits in Section(s): N/A Work Practice Standards in Section(s): N/A

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): N/A Reporting Requirements in Section(s): N/A
 

5/1/2002 

CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 3 

(Electronic Format) 

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

 No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment 

Discussion: N/A
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending January 5, 2013

|Filer                   | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|N.A. CORPORATION        | CIC           | Change in Control notice by James and Nita Wallenfelsz, both of North Oaks, Minnesota, to acquire 25 percent or more of the shares of N.A. Corporation, Roseville, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly gain control of North American Banking Company, Roseville, Minnesota.                                                    | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:01/07/2013
|Newspaper:              | Not available
|Federal Register:       | 01/07/2013   
|NEISEN BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC           | Retroactive Change in Control notice by David L. Neisen, Watkins, Minnesota, individually and as trustee of four Neisen family trusts, to retain 25 percent or more of the shares of Neisen Bancshares, Inc., Watkins, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly retain control of Farmers State Bank of Watkins, Watkins, Minnesota. | Newspaper:01/17/2013Federal Register:01/07/2013   
|Newspaper:              | 01/17/2013   
|Federal Register:       | 01/07/2013   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 7, 1995 (111), Para 111.12 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1311]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.111.12  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. OBEY:

       Page 28, line 11, strike ``$13,110,335,000'' and insert 
     ``$12,110,335,000''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

126

negative

Nays

293
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 26, 1995 (102), Para 102.23 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1199]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.102.23  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. ALLARD:

       Page 47, strike lines 1 through 6, relating to the Under 
     Secretary for Technology and the Office of Technology Policy.

It was decided in the

Yeas

197

negative

Nays

230
```
exv10w19



 






Exhibit 10.19




KEN NIBLING COMPENSATION PACKAGE TERM SHEET




	 	 	 	 	 
	Base Salary — Annual
	 	$205,000	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Incentive Bonus @ Plan
	 	$102,500(a)	 	E-25%, EV-50%, OA-75%
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Stock Options — Sign-On
	 	26,000 @ $23.31(b)	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Stock Options — Annual
	 	#TBD(b)	 	multiple of 2 times base salary
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Restricted Stock — Sign On
	 	7,507 shares (c)	 	$175,000 / $23.31
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Employee Stock Purchase
	 	21,450 shares(d)	 	$500,000 / $23.31
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Car Allowance — Annual
	 	$9,600	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Normal Severance
	 	12 months(e)	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Vacation — Annual
	 	4 weeks(f)	 	 








 




			
	(a)	 	2005 bonus to be pro-rated based on days of service
	 
	(b)	 	stock options vest 33 1⁄3% year
	 
	(c)	 	restricted stock vests 25% per year
	 
	(d)	 	employee purchased stock must be held: (1) per SEC 16 regulations; and (2) prior to the company going “public”, per all in-place shareholder agreements
	 
	(e)	 	severance is for involuntary termination “not for cause” as defined in J. Winkler’s 2005 employment agreement; severance is 12 months base salary and
bonus at EV; bonus for year of termination is pro-rated at EV (or higher based on actual results); and all stock options and restricted stock vests
	 
	(f)	 	1 week for 2005; 4 weeks annually commencing 1.1.06





	 	 	 	 	 
	Effective Date

	 	10.3.05
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Joe Winkler

	 	/s/ Ken Nibling	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Approved:

	 	Accepted:	 	 
	Joe Winkler

	 	Ken Nibling	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	10/3/05

	 	10/3/05	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Date

	 	Date
SCPW-20-0000381 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

I N RE CHRISTOPHER LEE SLAVICK, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 1PC041001534) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Christopher Lee Slavick’s “Motion for this Court to Order Immediate Release Due to Crimes Committed by (Former) Judge Karen Ahn,” which was filed as a petition for writ of mandamus on May 18, 2020, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that petitioner is not entitled to the requested extraordinary relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly, Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-20-0000381 29-MAY-2020 02:28 PMIT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, May 29, 2020. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED BE RNARD C. MCCORMICK , App ellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 22

- 2081 LT Case No. 2012

- 034158

- CFAES ST ATE OF FLORIDA , App ellee

.

___ _____________________________/ De cision filed December 6, 2022 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County , Leah R. Case , Judge. Bernard C. Mccormick, Milton, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

PE R CURIAM. AFF IRMED.

LAMBERT , C.J. , EVANDER and HARRIS , JJ., concur.
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1823

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 1, 1996

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

AN ACT

To amend the Central Utah Project Completion Act to direct

the Secretary of the Interior to allow for prepayment

of repayment contracts between the United States and

the Central Utah Water Conservancy District dated December 28, 1965, and November 26, 1985, and for other

purposes.
2

•HR 1823 RFS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PREPAYMENT OF CERTAIN REPAYMENT CON4 TRACTS BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND

5 THE CENTRAL UTAH WATER CONSERVANCY

6 DISTRICT.

7 Section 210 of the Central Utah Project Completion

8 Act (106 Stat. 4624) is amended by striking the second

9 sentence and inserting the following: ‘‘The Secretary shall

10 allow for prepayment of the repayment contract between

11 the United States and the Central Utah Water Conser12 vancy District dated December 28, 1965, and supple13 mented on November 26, 1985, providing for repayment

14 of municipal and industrial water delivery facilities for

15 which repayment is provided pursuant to such contract,

16 under terms and conditions similar to those contained in

17 the supplemental contract that provided for the prepay18 ment of the Jordan Aqueduct dated October 28, 1993.

19 The prepayment may be provided in several installments

20 to reflect substantial completion of the delivery facilities

21 being prepaid and may not be adjusted on the basis of

22 the type of prepayment financing utilized by the District.

23 The District shall exercise its right to prepayment pursu24 ant to this section by the end of fiscal year 2002. Nothing
3

•HR 1823 RFS

1 in this section authorizes or terminates the authority to

2 use tax exempt bond financing for this prepayment.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 30, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.171 Compressor stations: Additional safety equipment. ( a ) Each compressor station must have adequate fire protection facilities. If fire pumps are a part of these facilities, their operation may not be affected by the emergency shutdown system.
( b ) Each compressor station prime mover, other than an electrical induction or synchronous motor, must have an automatic device to shut down the unit before the speed of either the prime mover or the driven unit exceeds a maximum safe speed.
( c ) Each compressor unit in a compressor station must have a shutdown or alarm device that operates in the event of inadequate cooling or lubrication of the unit.
( d ) Each compressor station gas engine that operates with pressure gas injection must be equipped so that stoppage of the engine automatically shuts off the fuel and vents the engine distribution manifold.
( e ) Each muffler for a gas engine in a compressor station must have vent slots or holes in the baffles of each compartment to prevent gas from being trapped in the muffler.
-----Original Message----- 

From: cindycatlett@yahoo.com [mailto:cindycatlett@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:25 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Cindy Catlett 

5208A Padre Blvd #27 

South Padre Island, TX 78597
-----Original Message----- 

From: micrystal@verizon.net [mailto:micrystal@verizon.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:14 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Monica Crystal 

210 W Crystal Lake Ave 207C 

Haddonfield, NJ 08033
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, August 4, 1995 (109), Para 109.22 Clerk to Correct Engrossment]
[Page 1293]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.109.22  clerk to correct engrossment

  On motion of Mr. BLILEY, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That in the engrossment of the foregoing bill, the Clerk be 
authorized to make technical corrections and conforming changes to the 
bill, and to delete duplicated material.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

                    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in                     *United States*                     v.                     *Alaska Sutherlin Knolls*, Civ. No. 07-1084 AS (D.Or.), was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of Oregon on July 27, 2007.                

This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the United States against Alaska Sutherlin Knolls, pursuant to Section 309 of the Clean Water Act to obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the Defendant for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants into waters of the United States that do not comply with a Clean Water Act permit. The proposed Consent Decree resolves these allegations by requiring the Defendant to restore impacted areas and perform mitigation and to pay a civil penalty.

                    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this Notice. Please address comments to David J. Kaplan, United States Department of Justice, P.O. Box 23986, Washington DC 20026-3986, and refer to                     *United States*                     v.                     *Alaska Sutherlin Knolls*, DJ No. 90-5-1-1-17836.                

                    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, United States District Court for the District of Oregon, 740 Mark O. Hatfield, United States Courthouse, 1000 Southwest Third Avenue, Portland, OR 97204-2802. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed at                     *http://www.usdoj.gov/​enrd/​Consent_​Decrees.html*.                

Russell M. Young,

Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment & Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 07-3792 Filed 8-2-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
-----Original Message----- 

From: carolfdavis@aol.com [mailto:carolfdavis@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:41 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Carol Davis 

1326 Watchung Ave. 

Plainfield, NJ 07060
§ 178.345-9 Pumps, piping, hoses and connections. ( a ) Suitable means must be provided during loading or unloading operations to ensure that pressure within a cargo tank does not exceed test pressure.
( b ) Each hose, piping, stop-valve, lading retention fitting and closure must be designed for a bursting pressure of the greater of 100 psig or four times the MAWP.
( c ) Each hose coupling must be designed for a bursting pressure of the greater of 120 psig or 4.8 times the MAWP of the cargo tank, and must be designed so that there will be no leakage when connected.
( d ) Suitable provision must be made to allow for and prevent damage due to expansion, contraction, jarring, and vibration. Slip joints may not be used for this purpose in the lading retention system.
( e ) Any heating device, when installed, must be so constructed that the breaking of its external connections will not cause leakage of the cargo tank lading.
( f ) Any gauging, loading or charging device, including associated valves, must be provided with an adequate means of secure closure to prevent leakage.
( g ) The attachment and construction of each loading/unloading or charging line must be of sufficient strength, or be protected by a sacrificial device, such that any load applied by loading/unloading or charging lines connected to the cargo tank cannot cause damage resulting in loss of lading from the cargo tank.
( h ) Use of a nonmetallic pipe, valve or connection that is not as strong and heat resistant as the cargo tank material is authorized only if such attachment is located outboard of the lading retention system.
[Amdt. 178-89, 54 FR 25025, June 12, 1989, as amended at 55 FR 37061, Sept. 7, 1990, Amdt. 178-89, 56 FR 27877, June 17, 1991; Amdt. 178-118, 61 FR 51341, Oct. 1, 1996]