alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31-2



Certification

I, Joseph J. Syta, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  March 14, 2005 | /s/Joseph J. Syta       Joseph J. Syta
       Vice President - Controller and Treasurer
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message----- 

From: afsadmin@artfromscrap.org [mailto:afsadmin@artfromscrap.org] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:27 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jill Cloutier 

312 East Sola Street B 

Santa Barbara, CA 93101
TRAVELLING SCREEN VELOCITY CALCULATIONS 

LAKEWATER PUMP STATION (LWPS) NOS. 1 AND 2 

ARCELORMITTAL BURNS HARBOR LLC

LWPS No. 1 Calculations

Given: 

• Four travelling screens are operating during normal conditions 

• Elevation of bottom of wet well at screens is 558.7 feet 

• Water elevation at screens is about 578.8 feet 

• Water depth at screens is 20.1 feet (578.8-558.7 feet) 

• Each basket of travelling screen has a total vertical height of 2 feet (including frame 

around the screen portion) 

• Screen portion of each basket is 1.75 feet high and 10 feet wide for a total screen area 

of 17.5 sq. feet (see drawing). 

• 1 cu. foot of water is 7.48 gallons 

• 2008 flow at LWPS No. 1 averaged 58,601 gallons per minute (gpm) 

Calculations: 

20.1 feet water depth ÷ 2 fe et et per bask ≈ 10 submerged baskets 

.ݐ݂ .ݍݏ 17.5 ൌ ܣ ൌ ݁ܽݎܣ ݁݁݊ݎܵܿ

ൈ ݐ݇݁ݏܾܽ

ݏݐ݇݁ݏܾܽ 10

ݒܽ ݐ 4 .ݐ݂ .ݍݏ 700 ൌ ݏ݁݁݊ݎܿݏ ݈݈݁݅݊݃ ݎ ൈ ݁݁݊ݎܿݏ

.ݐ݂ .ݑܿ 1 58,60 ൌ ݏ݁݁݊ݎܿݏ ݈݈ܽ ݄݃ݑ݋ݎ݄ݐ ݓ݋݈ܨ

݁ݐݑ݉݅݊ ݎ݁݌ .ݐ݂ .ݑܿ 7,834 ൌ 7.4 ൈ ݉݌݃ 1 ݈݃ܽ. 8

.ݐ݂ .ݑܿ 7,834 ݎܣ ൊ ݓ݋݈ܨ ൌ ݕݐܿ݅݋ܸ݈݁

݁ܽ ൌ ݉݅݊ ൊ 700 ݏ

ݐ݂ 11.2 ൌ

݉݅݊

/݉݅݊ݐ݂ 11.2 ൌ ݐ݂ .ݍ

ൈ

1 ݉݅݊ݐ݂ 0.19 ൌ ݁ܿݏ 60

݁ܿݏ

 

LWPS No. 2 Calculations

Given: 

• Four travelling screens are operating during normal conditions 

• Elevation of bottom of wet well at screens is 540.0 feet 

• Water elevation at screens is about 578.8 feet 

• Water depth at screens is 38.8 feet (578.8-540.0 feet) 

• Each basket of travelling screen has a total vertical height of 2 feet (including frame 

around the screen portion) 

• Screen portion of each basket is 1.5 feet high and 14 feet wide for a total screen area of 

21 sq. feet (see drawing). 

• 1 cu. foot of water is 7.48 gallons 

• 2008 flow at LWPS No. 2 averaged 197,541 gallons per minute (gpm) 

Calculations: 

38.8 feet water depth ÷ 2 fe ske et per ba t ≈ 19 submerged baskets 

.ݐ݂ .ݍݏ 21 ൌ ܣ ൌ ݁ܽݎܣ ݁݁݊ݎܵܿ

ൈ ݐ݇݁ݏܾܽ

ݏݐ݇݁ݏܾܽ 19

݈݁ݒܽݎݐ 4 .ݐ݂ .ݍݏ 1,596 ൌ ݏ݁݁݊ݎܿݏ ݈݅݊݃ ൈ ݁݁݊ݎܿݏ

.ݐ݂ .ݑܿ 1 197 ൌ ݏ݁݁݊ݎܿݏ ݈݈ܽ ݄݃ݑ݋ݎ݄ݐ ݓ݋݈ܨ

݁ݐݑ݉݅݊ ݎ݁݌ .ݐ݂ .ݑܿ 26,409 ൌ 7 ൈ ݉݌݃ ,541 ݈݃ܽ. .48

.ݐ݂ .ݑܿ 26,409 ݁ݎܣ ൊ ݓ݋݈ܨ ൌ ݕݐܿ݅݋ܸ݈݁

ݏ 1,596 /݉݅݊ݐ݂ 16.55 ൌ ݐ݂ .ݍ ൊ ݉݅݊ ൌ ܽ

ݐ݂ 16.55 ൌ

݉݅݊

ൈ

1 ݉݅݊ݐ݂ 0.28 ൌ ݁ܿݏ 60

݁ܿݏ
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*Hiram Owen and others, *Respondents, v.*Arthur D. Seavey and others, *Appel*lants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Boardman, J.;

Bookes, J., not acting.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-609 

________________________________________________________________________ 

WEAPONS 

Proliferation 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and TURKEY 

Signed at Ankara June 14, 2005 

with 

Exchange of Notes 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
TURKEY 

Weapons: Proliferation 

 Agreement signed at Ankara June 14, 2005; 

 Entered into force June 9, 2008. 

 With exchange of notes.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, July 21, 1995 (99), Para 99.8 Transportation Appropriations, FY 1996]
[Page 1172]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.99.8  transportation appropriations, fy 1996

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mrs. MORELLA, pursuant to House Resolution 
194 and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of 
the Whole House on the state of the Union for the consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2002) making appropriations for the Department of 
Transportation and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 1996, and for other purposes.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mrs. MORELLA, by unanimous consent, 
designated Mr. BEREUTER as Chairman of the Committee of the Whole; and 
after some time spent therein,
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaHOOD, assumed the Chair.
  When Mr. BEREUTER, Chairman, reported that the Committee, having had 
under consideration said bill, had come to no resolution thereon.
```
** Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hudson United Bancorp (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Kenneth T. Neilson, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James W. Nall, as Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

 
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|                    |
|-------------------------|
| /s/ KENNETH T. NEILSON  |
|                         |
| Kenneth T. Neilson      |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| Date: August 24, 2005   |
|  

           |
| /s/ JAMES W. NALL       |
|                         |
| James W. Nall           |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| Date: August 24, 2005   |

 

** **

----
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, June 29, 1995 (89), Para 89.23 Providing for the Consideration of an Adjournment Resolution]
[Page 1084]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.89.23  providing for the consideration of an adjournment resolution

  Mrs. WALDHOLTZ, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported 
(Rept. No. 104-168) the resolution (H. Res. 179) providing for immediate 
consideration of a concurrent resolution providing for adjournment of 
the House and Senate for the Independence Day district work period.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
#### Frank A. BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Frank A. BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MUTUAL BROADCASTING SYSTEM, Inc., a corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 12348-12349.

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

Oct 17, 1958.

*859Frank A. Barnes, Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

Berle L. Schwartz, John B. Moser, Don H. Reuben, Howard Ellis, Keith Masters, David MacDonald, Chicago, Ill., Chaffetz & Masters, Chicago, Ill., of counsel.

Before FINNEGAN, SCHNACKEN-BERG and PARKINSON, Circuit Judges.

SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge.

Frank A. Barnes decided to be a candidate for President of the United States of America at an election to be held in November, 1956. For the purpose of making a public announcement thereof, he demanded of each of American Broadcasting Company and Mutual Broadcasting System, Inc., defendants, free use of their radio and television broadcasting facilities equal to that given to President Eisenhower February 29, 1956. His demands having been refused, he brought suits against them in the district court for $500,000,000 and $300,-000,000 and attorneys’ fees. He asked for and was given leave to prosecute his suits as a pauper. He relied upon alleged violations of 47 U.S.C.A. § 315.

On April 18, 1957, the district court entered orders dismissing the complaints. No appeal was taken from either of those orders. On May 2,1957, he made motions for “reversal” of said decisions, which motions were on the same day denied. No appeal was taken from the latter orders.

On March 17, 1958, plaintiff made a motion in each case for relief from the orders of April 18 and May 2, 1957, relying upon 28 U.S.C.A. rule 60(b). These motions were, on April 3, 1958, denied.

He filed notices of appeal from the “decisions” of April 18, May 2, and July 17,1957, and April 3 and April 22, 1958.1

 Plaintiff’s failure to take timely appeals from the orders entered on April 18, 1957 and May 2, 1957, as required by 28 U.S.C.A. rule 73(a), followed by his failure to allege facts establishing at least one of the grounds set forth as a basis for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. rule 60(b), requires that the orders of the district court entered April 3, 1958, be affirmed.

Orders affirmed.

1

. The orders of the district court entered on July 17, 1957 and April 22, 1958 denied plaintiff’s motion for permission to appeal *in forma pauperis.*The propriety of those orders is not questioned in defendant’s brief in this court.

FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge

(concurring).

What the majority have written shows why the papers before us are undeserving of any opinion. I would grant defendants’ motions to dismiss without further ado.
From: heidiwacker19@gmail.com [mailto:heidiwacker19@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:19 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Heidi Wacker 

1210 Calle de Lago 

Socorro, NM 87801
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2185

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage

of bone mass measurements for certain individuals under part B of

the medicare program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 3, 1995

Mrs. MORELLA (for herself, Mrs. LOWEY, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of

Texas, Ms. NORTON, Mr. STEARNS, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Ms. PELOSI,

Ms. RIVERS, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. YATES, Mr. FROST, Ms. MCKINNEY,

Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, and Mr. SANDERS) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to

the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for coverage of bone mass measurements for certain individuals under part B of the medicare program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Bone Mass

5 Measurement Standardization Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 2185 IH

1 SEC. 2. MEDICARE COVERAGE OF BONE MASS MEASURE2 MENTS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—

4 (1) COVERAGE.—Section 1861(s)(2) of the So5 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)), as

6 amended by section 147(f)(6)(B)(iii) of the Social

7 Security Act Amendments of 1994, is amended—

8 (A) in subparagraph (N), by striking

9 ‘‘and’’ at the end;

10 (B) in subparagraph (O), by striking

11 ‘‘and’’ at the end; and

12 (C) by inserting after subparagraph (O)

13 the following new subparagraph:

14 ‘‘(P) bone mass measurement (as defined in

15 subsection (oo)); and’’.

16 (2) BONE MASS MEASUREMENTS DESCRIBED.—

17 Section 1861 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x), as

18 amended by section 146(a) of the Social Security

19 Act Amendments of 1994, is amended by adding at

20 the end the following new subsection:

21 ‘‘Bone Mass Measurement

22 ‘‘(oo)(1) The term ‘bone mass measurement’ means

23 a radiologic or radioisotopic procedure or other scientif24 ically proven technology performed on a qualified individ25 ual (as defined in paragraph (2)) for the purpose of identi-
3

•HR 2185 IH

1 fying bone mass or detecting bone loss, and includes a

2 physician’s interpretation of the results of the procedure.

3 ‘‘(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term ‘quali4 fied individual’ means (in accordance with regulations pre5 scribed by the Secretary)—

6 ‘‘(A) an estrogen-deficient woman at clinical

7 risk for osteoporosis;

8 ‘‘(B) an individual with vertebral abnormalities;

9 ‘‘(C) an individual receiving long-term

10 glucocorticoid steroid therapy;

11 ‘‘(D) an individual with primary

12 hyperparathyroidism; or

13 ‘‘(E) an individual who is monitored to assess

14 the individual’s response to or the efficacy of ap15 proved osteoporosis drug therapies.’’.

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

17 subsection (a) shall apply to bone mass measurements per18 formed on or after January 1, 1996.

Æ
EXHIBIT 23.2




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board of Directors


Vermont Electric Power Company, Inc.:




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (Nos. 333-141681, 333-151019 and 333-162979) on Form S-3 and the registration statement (No. 333-152872) on Form S-8 of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation of our report dated March 8, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Vermont Electric Power Company, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, which report appears in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation.




Our report on the consolidated financial statements of Vermont Electric Power Company, Inc. and subsidiary, refers to the adoption of FASB ASC 810, Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51, as of January 1, 2009.






/s/ KPMG LLP






Burlington, Vermont


March 12, 2010




Vt. Reg. No. 92-0000241
Note to Docket EPA - HQ - OAR - 2009 - 0837

The following two sentences that occur on pages 5, 43 and 55 of the Response to Comments document ( Document ID # EPA - HQ - OAR - 2009 - 0837 - 0078 in the docket) are incorrect and misleading and should be ignored: “ EPA notes that the Louisiana DEQ has agreed to cancel its stack testing accreditation program (see Document ID # EPA - HQ - OAR - 2009 - 0837 - 0072 in the docket) and in its place substitute accreditation to ASTM D 7036 - 04. Louisiana DEQ also agrees to recognize third party accreditors such as the Stack Testing Accreditation Council. ”
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, August 2, 1995 (107), Para 107.8 Order of Business--Consideration of H.R. 2127]
[Page 1240]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.107.8  order of business--consideration of h.r. 2127

  On motion of Mr. PORTER, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That during the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2127) making 
appropriations for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, 
and Education, and related agencies, for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 1996, and for other purposes, pursuant to House Resolution 
208, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may postpone until a 
time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a 
request for a recorded vote on any amendment, and that the Chairman of 
the Committee of the Whole may reduce to not less than five minutes the 
time for voting by electronic device without intervening business, 
provided that the time for voting by electronic device on the first in 
any series of questions shall not be less than fifteen minutes.
```
EXHIBIT 24.15
                      POWER OF ATTORNEY


The  undersigned,  as  Controller of  West  Texas  Utilities
Company  (the  "Company"),  hereby  makes,  constitutes  and
appoints  Glenn  Files his true and lawful  attorney-in-fact
and  agent, with full power and authority to execute in  the
name  and  on  behalf of the undersigned,  in  any  and  all
capacities,  the Company's Annual Report on  Form  10-K  for
1995  and any and all amendments thereto, to be filed  under
the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and  any
other  documents and instruments incidental thereto, and  to
file  the  same, with all exhibits thereto and all documents
in  connection therewith, with the Securities  and  Exchange
Commission,  hereby  granting to such attorney-in-fact,  and
agent,   full  power  and  authority  of  substitution   and
revocation  in the premises and full power and authority  to
do  and  perform each and every act and thing requisite  and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully for
all  intents and purposes as the undersigned might or  could
do  in  person and hereby ratifying and confirming all  that
such  attorney-in-fact and agent, may do or cause to be done
by virtue of this Power of Attorney.

IN  WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto executed this Power  of
Attorney this 23rd day of January, 1996.



                              R. Russell Davis






Subscribed and sworn to before me this 23rd day of  January,
1996 by R. Russell Davis.

                              Kit Hill
                              Notary Public

My Commission Expires:
6-14-97
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 144 (Friday, July 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 41290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3690]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date and Time: Thursday, August 2, 2007; 6 p.m.

Place: Via Teleconference; Public Call In Number: 1-800-597-7623.

Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda.
II. Approval of Minutes of July 13, Meeting.
III. Program Planning.
    <bullet> FY 2007 Statutory Report.
IV. Future Agenda Items.
V. Adjourn.

Contact Person for Further Information: Manuel Alba, Press and 
Communications, (202) 376-8582.

    Dated: July 24, 2007.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-3690 Filed 7-24-07; 4:42 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
From: williambader@hotmail.com [mailto:williambader@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:30 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

William Bader 

1402 Lorain Ave 

Bethlehem, PA 18018
-----Original Message----- 

From: kevin.sweeney@insightbb.com [mailto:kevin.sweeney@insightbb.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:11 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kevin Sweeney 

814 Idlewild Ct. 

Lexington, KY 40505