alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 178.510 Standards for wooden barrels. ( a ) The following are identification codes for wooden barrels: ( 1 ) 2C1 for a bung type wooden barrel; and
( 2 ) 2C2 for a slack type (removable head) wooden barrel.
( b ) Construction requirements for wooden barrels are as follows: ( 1 ) The wood used must be of good quality, straight-grained, well-seasoned and free from knots, bark, rotten wood, sapwood or other defects likely to lessen the effectiveness of the barrel for the purpose intended.
( 2 ) The body and heads must be of a design appropriate to the capacity and intended use of the barrel.
( 3 ) Staves and heads must be sawn or cleft with the grain so that no annual ring extends over more than half the thickness of a stave or head.
( 4 ) Barrel hoops must be of steel or iron of good quality. The hoops of 2C2 barrels may be of a suitable hardwood.
( 5 ) For wooden barrels 2C1, the diameter of the bung-hole may not exceed half the width of the stave in which it is placed.
( 6 ) For wooden barrels 2C2, heads must fit tightly into crozes.
( 7 ) Maximum capacity of barrel: 250 L (66 gallons).
( 8 ) Maximum net mass: 400 kg (882 pounds).
§ 1560.205 Redress process. ( a ) If an individual believes he or she has been improperly or unfairly delayed or prohibited from boarding an aircraft or entering a sterile area as a result of the Secure Flight program, the individual may seek assistance through the redress process established under this section.
( b ) An individual may obtain the forms and information necessary to initiate the redress process on the DHS TRIP Web site at *http://www.dhs.gov/trip* or by contacting the DHS TRIP office by mail. Individuals should send written requests for forms to the DHS TRIP office and include their name and address in the request. DHS will provide the necessary forms and information to individuals through its Web site or by mail.
( c ) The individual must send to the DHS TRIP office the personal information and copies of the specified identification documents. If TSA needs additional information in order to continue the redress process, TSA will so notify the individual in writing and request that additional information. The DHS TRIP Office will assign the passenger a unique identifier, which TSA will recognize as the Redress Number, and the passenger may use that Redress Number in future correspondence with TSA and when making future travel reservations.
( d ) TSA, in coordination with the TSC and other appropriate Federal law enforcement or intelligence agencies, if necessary, will review all the documentation and information requested from the individual, correct any erroneous information, and provide the individual with a timely written response.
From: constance_i@charter.net [mailto:constance_i@charter.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:44 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Constancei Istratescu 

1520 e. appleton street 

Long Beach, CA 90802
#### Stanford W. Barrett, *Respondent, v.*Benjamin F. Lewis, *Appellant.*

Judgment, affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Comprehensive Sickle Cell Center Review.                    

*Date:*                         September 5-7, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Crystal City Marriott, 1999 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rina Das, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7200, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-0297,                         *dasr2@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 13, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-4071 Filed 8-20-07; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 23.02
                                                            CIPS

















                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report included in and incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K,
into Central Illinois Public Service Company's previously filed
Registration Statements File Nos. 33-29384, 33-31475, 33-59674, 33-45506,
33-56063 and 333-18473 and CIPSCO Incorporated's previously filed Registration
Statement File No. 33-32936.



                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Chicago, Illinois,
March 10, 1997
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 212

To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify the remedial jurisdiction

relating to taxes of inferior Federal courts.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. CRANE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify the remedial jurisdiction relating to taxes of inferior Federal

courts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Judicial Taxation Pro5 hibition Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. TITLE 28 AMENDMENT.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 85 of title 28, United

8 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1341

9 the following new section:
2

•HR 212 IH

1 ‘‘§ 1341A. Prohibition on judicial imposition or in2 crease of taxes

3 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other pro4 vision of law, no inferior court established by the Congress

5 under article III of the Constitution shall have jurisdiction

6 to issue any remedy, order, injunction, writ, judgment, or

7 other judicial decree requiring the Federal Government or

8 any State or local government to impose any new tax or

9 to increase any existing tax or tax rate.

10 ‘‘(b) EXCEPTION.—Nothing in this section shall pro11 hibit a court from ordering remedies authorized by law

12 and otherwise within the jurisdiction of that court which

13 may require expenditures by the Federal Government or

14 a State or local government, if such expenditures are nec15 essary to effectuate such remedies.

16 ‘‘(c) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the

17 term ‘tax’ includes—

18 ‘‘(1) personal income taxes;

19 ‘‘(2) real and personal property taxes;

20 ‘‘(3) sales and transfer taxes;

21 ‘‘(4) estate and gift taxes;

22 ‘‘(5) excise taxes;

23 ‘‘(6) user taxes;

24 ‘‘(7) corporate and business income taxes; and

25 ‘‘(8) licensing fees or taxes.’’.
3

•HR 212 IH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

2 at the beginning of chapter 85 of title 28, United States

3 Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to

4 section 1341 the following new item:

‘‘1341A. Prohibition on judicial imposition or increase of taxes.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-106210 of Pioneer Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries, ("Pioneer") on Form S-8
of our report dated March 29, 2004, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Pioneer for the year ended December 31, 2003 (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes 1) an explanatory paragraph referring to the
application of fresh start accounting in accordance with AICPA Statement of
Position 90-7 "Financial Reporting for Entities in Reorganization Under the
Bankruptcy Code" and the lack of comparability of financial information between
reporting periods, and 2) an emphasis paragraph related to the adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets," on January 1, 2002).



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
March 29, 2004
#### The Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank, *Respondent, v.*Thomas J. Clute, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Exhibit
32
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Healthways, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Ben R. Leedle, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mary A. Chaput, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)      The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)      The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Ben R. Leedle,
Jr.
 Ben R.
Leedle, Jr.
 Chief
Executive Officer
 November
9, 2009
 
 /s/ Mary A.
Chaput
 Mary A.
Chaput
 Chief
Financial Officer
 November
9, 2009
#### Alma A. Parker *et al., Respondents, v.*Henry Austin, *Appellant*.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered before another referee, with costs of this appeal to abide the final award of costs in the action. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
The State ofNew Hampshire 

### DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES T h omas S
. Burack , Commissioner

Mr. Curt Spalding Regional Admini strator USEPA New E n g land , R eg ion I 5 Post Offic e Square , Suite 100 Boston, MA 021 09-3 9 12 March 2 , 20 1 2

Re: Maintenance Plan for New Hampshire's F ormer 1-hr Ozone N onattainment Areas D ear Administrator Spalding: Pursuant to Section 11 0 of the federal C lean Air Act as amended , the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHD ES) submits one paper copy and one e lectronic copy of thi s State Implementation Plan (SIP) re v i s ion containing a maintenance plan for New Hamp s hire's former 1

- hr ozon e nonattainment areas. The enclo sed di sk i s an exact duplicate of the paper copy , as well as a dditional data files s upporting Attachment A of the m a intenan ce plan. NHDES has prepared thi s SIP rev i s ion in accordance with the general SIP s ubmittal require ment s o f 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix V , E PA r egu lation s and g uidance on red esign ation s , and New Hamp s hire laws and regulations
. As Governor J o hn L y nch ' s designee , I am re qu esting E PA ' s approval ofthis SIP revision, whi c h addresses those areas in C he s hire , Hill sboroug h , Me rrimack , R oc kin g ham , and Straffor d counties that we re fo rm e rly nonattainme nt for the 1-hr ozo ne standard , but w hich we r e classifie d as attainment/unclassifiable for th e 8-hr ozone s tandard. EPA pro v ided co mments on the proposed SIP rev i s ion , which NHDES h as a ddre ssed in the administrati v e docum e nt s attached to the en clo sed plan , including docum entation certifying the public proc ess . If you h ave any questions re gard in g thi s s ubmitta l , please contact C harl es Martone a t (603) 27 1- 108 9
.

Director, A ir Resources Division

rrs/chm enclo s ure: NH Ozone Maint e nance Plan SIP Revision w / attac hm e nts (on paper and di s k)
ec: Anne Arno ld, USEPA Reg ion I D ES W e b S it e: www.des.nh.gov P.O. Box 9 5, 29 Ha ze n Dri ve, Co nc o rd , ew H a mp s hir e 0 33 02-00 95 Telep h one : (603) 27 1-3503 Fax : (603) 27 1

-2 181 T DD Access : R e la y NH 1

- 800

- 735

- 2964
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

__________________________________________ 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 11, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 133772(59) Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

ESTATE OF CHANTELL BUCKNER, by its 

Personal Representative, RICHARD RASHID,

and LAQUATA WRIGHT, Minor, by her

Conservator, MICHAEL J. PANEK, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

Cross-Appellants, 

 SC: 133772 

v COA: 270455 

Ingham CC: 05-001467-NI 

CITY OF LANSING,

Defendant-Appellant, 

Cross-Appellee,

and 

ESTATE OF LUTHER WAMPLER, by its

Personal Representative, PAMELA WAMPLER,

 Defendant, Cross-Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Cross-Appellee,

and 

MARTHA WAMPLER, 

 Defendant, Cross-Plaintiff, 

and 

MORLEY S. OATES POST 701 VETERANS OF 

FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES, 

 Defendant, Cross-Defendant-Appellee, 

Cross-Appellee. 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by Michigan Association for Justice for 

extension of the time to file their brief amicus curiae is considered and it is GRANTED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 11, 2008 

 Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

AKIM SHARIF JONES

- WILLIAMS,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 646 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of April, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED . The issues, as stated by the Commonwealth, are:

(1) Whether the Superior Court issued a decision in conflict with and failed to properly apply and follow the binding legal precedent of the United States Supreme Court and this Court, in holding that 75 Pa.C.S. § 3755 does not independently support implied consent on the part of driver suspected or arrested for DUI, rendering the implied

- consent statute unconstitutional?

(2) Whether the Superior Court issued a decision in conflict with and failed to properly apply and follow the binding legal precedent of the United States S upreme Court in Mitchell v. Wisconsin , ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2525 (2019), by finding that exigent circumstances did not exist to support a warrantless request to test Defendant’s blood? .
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-823 

________________________________________________________________________ 

ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and PERU 

Signed at Lima July 24, 2006 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
PERU 

Environmental Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Lima July 24, 2006; 

 Entered into force August 23, 2009.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-1221 

________________________________________________________________________ 

FISHERIES 

Pacific Salmon 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CANADA 

Amending Annex IV to the 

Treaty of January 28, 1985, as 

Amended 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Washington December 21, 2010 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
CANADA 

Fisheries: Pacific Salmon 

 Agreement amending Annex IV of 

 the treaty of January 28, 1985, as amended. 

 Effected by exchange of notes at Washington 

 December 21, 2010; 

 Entered into force December 21, 2010.
#### Catharine Lachenmeyer, *Appellant, v.*August Lachenmeyer, *Respondent.*

Order reversed; order entered as directed in opinion by

Daniels, J.,

and by Brady, J., dissenting.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Trends in high school dropoutand completion rates in the United States ...: compendium report.**
 
1972-2008 | 1972-2009| 1972-2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2018 | 2019
 
SuDoc Number:ED 1.329:
Item Number:0461-D-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000887394
 
September 27, 2018
#### Orrin Spencer, Appellant, *v.*Edwin F. Brown, Respondent.

J udgment affirmed. Opinion by

Haight, J.
Exhibit 12-1

ENERGY EAST CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

|                                                                              | Calendar Year
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------
|                                                                              |              
|(Thousands)                                                                   | 2004         
|                                                                              |              
|Income From Continuing
  Operations                                           | $237,621     
|Add:                                                                          |              
|Income tax                                                                    | 251,444      
|                                                                              |              
|Pretax Income from
  Continuing Operations                                    | 489,065      
|Fixed Charges                                                                 | 289,846      
|                                                                              |              
|Earnings, as defined                                                          | $778,911     
|                                                                              |              
|Fixed Charges:                                                                |              
|Interest charges, net(1)                                                      | $276,890     
|Interest portion of
   rental charges                                         | 5,880        
|Earnings required to
   cover preferred stock
   dividends of subsidiaries(2) | 7,076        
|                                                                              |              
|Fixed Charges, as defined                                                     | $289,846     
|                                                                              |              
|Ratio of Earnings to
  Fixed Charges(3)(4)(5)                                 | 2.69         
|