UNITED STATES

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 9 2'

75 HAWTHORNE STREET

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105 - ~-- ..

IN RE:

SAINT-GOBAINCOl\'TAINERS. INC..

RESPONDENT

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

I

oq

DOCKETNO.CAAl200&- 39

CONSENT AGREEMENT AND

FINAL ORDER PURSUANT TO

40 C.F.R. §§ 22.13 and 22.18

I. CONSt:NT AGREt:JltENT

n.c, Unit'" States Environmcntall'rotecuon Ageney (""EPA"). Region 9, and Salnt-Gobam

Conlalners.lne. ("'Sainl-G<>bain" or '·Respondcnl') agree 10 seIde tins matt... and eOllscnllo lhe entry of

th'l Consenl AgieelllC:UI and Fmal Order (''CAFO·) ",,'IUIIU to 40 C.F.R. tt 22.13 and 22.18.

A. AUDIQRITY AND PARTIES

1, 1lIII 'I • <;1vil admm,stn,I,Vl:' xtlOll brou&hl under Sechon II3(d) of the Clean AIr Act (the MAct'),

III amendtd. 42 U.s.c. § 7413(d). and theConsoIldatcd Rules ofPrxboc Gov=1<n1 the Adnurustn,llw

,he.. ne,,1 ofCi.,1 Pmaltlcs, 40 C.F.R. Part 22.

2. Contplamant IS the ofthe AIr 0..,_of EPA RcgKlIl IX. The Admml5tnllOr ofEPA hal

de\epted 10 the Reponal Adrmrnstr3tlJ/ of EPA Rqoon lX the autbcnty 10 .-.: <:Omp1aInl$, and the

RcpJrW AdrmruSlrllOr, m 111m. has ~Iepled thai authcrtty to the ComplamanL

B. STAllUORy AND REGlJV.TQRY BASIS

J. pnmary PUfJIOS<" ofthe Ael IS lO pr<llCl;1 and enl\arItt thequ.alityoftbe rIIl1on'lllrTe$OtlrCCS
so as to promote the pubhc health and welfare and the produc\ive capacity of its population. Stt 42 U.S.c.

§ 74llI(bXI).

4. "The AdminiSlrator of EPA, pursuant to authority und.... sectIon 109 oftt>e Act. 42 US.c. § 7409.

promulgated the National Ambient Air Quality Standards ("NAAQS'') for certam criteria air pollutants. 40

C.F.R. §§ 50.9, 50.10.

5 Pursuant to Sec1lon 107(d) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7407(d), the AdminiSlrator has promUlgated

liSls ofattainment S1atus designations for each air quality control ",ginn ("AQCR") in every state. These

lists identify the anainment status of each AQCR for each oftlle ent"';a pollutants. The attainment status

desIgnations for California AQCRs are listed at 40 C.F.R. § 81303.

6. Madera County is within thejuriS(\ic\ion of the San Joaquin Valley Au Pollution Comrol Dlslnc\

("SJVA!'CD" or "Dlstnct"). Madera County has b«n deSlgnated as a se,-eu nonatlammem area for the 8-

hour ozone NAAQS, non-anainmem for the NAAQS for particulate mallor less than 10 microns in

diameter ("PM10'l. and as unclassifiable for the sulfur dIoxide ("S02"') NAAQS. 40 C.FR § 81.305.

7. Section II O(a) of the Act requi",s thlll all states adopt state implementation plans ("SIPs") that

proVIde for the llnplcmentatlon, maintenance and enForcc:ment of primary and SttOI"ldary alf quahty

standards. 42 U.S.c. § 7410(a),

8. Section IIO(aX2XC) of the Act requires each SIP to include a p=onslIUction permit program for

new and modified soun:es. 42 U.S.c. §7410(aX2XC).

9, A person's failu", to comply with any appmved regulatory pmvision ofa SIP renders the person m

Vlola1100 ofan applicable implanrnta1ion plan and subject to enforcement under sec1ion 113 ofthl: Act.

40 C.F.R. §52.23.

Regulatory Background

Authority to ConS!IUct Pennits

10. In accordance with se<;tion 110 ofthe Act, EPA has approved Rules 2010 (Pennas RNJulml) (as

adopted by the DIstrict on December 17, 1992) and 2201 (New and Modified Statlooary Souret' ReVIew

2
Rule) (IS adopted by the Ihstnct llIl December 19. 2002) mloSJVAPCD's por'llllll of the Califonu. SIP,

See 64 FR 39920 (July 23, 1999) and 6g FR 27837 (May 17, 2(04),

II. On June 16, 2006. the D15lnct I.$SUed rwo pemut$(~ferred loIS Au!honty IOConstnICl ('"ATe")

pemulll) for Furnace'l (No. C..JIOI.I.II) and Furnace 112 (No. C-80I·2-8).

12. CondJlKn'I 15 md JO ofATC C-80I·I·11 and ATC C-80I·2-8. R:SpCd1~ly,requm: Samt-Vobmn

to comply ....uh the apphcablt reqUlmnmta for quahty and mamlenlnCC ofthe

C.F.R Pan 60, AppendIX F.

13. S«t,on 3.0 of40 C-F.R Pan 60. AppendIX F reqwreseach!iOUroe .....nc:l'"OCopenlOr IOdevelop

and Implement a quahtyCOlltrol plan ("QC Plan R). TheQC Plan must be kqll on and made

available foc mspection by <:rtfoo:ement agmc"es.

14. SectIOn 4.0 of40 C-F.R Part 60, Appendix F reqUII-es that >OIIrCes make a dally assessment oftlle

cahblallOfl dnft ("CD") at least once dally in accordance With the method p"'scribc<j by the manufacturer.

15. Condmons 10 and 24 of ATe C·SOI·l·11 and ATe C·BOl.2·S. respectIvely. require Samt-Gobam

to eqUip the common exhaust stack for Fuma« III .nd furnace It2 with a COMS that meets the

requ,,~mmlll of40 CFR part 60, AppmdIX B, ....dudma requimnrnts for cerIlfyma COMS.

16 CondllKN 18 and 33 ofATC C-80I-I.ll and ATC C-801-2..f1. rcspccllvely, req""~ Sw!t-Goba!n

Ret"~Bacqmund

SJVAPCD Ru~ 1080: Stack MmIlOnnJl

.....'PCC'i by the Ihanct on Ou;"""b... 17, 1992), Into SJVAPCD's portion ofthe Cahfornla SiP. 69 Fed.

Rea. 22441 (ApnI26. 20(4).

18 S«llon 2.0 of Rule 1080 SUIt!'$, '1'1U5 \\lie shall apply to any .....lI<:t" or operator ofa source

operatlOfl ..tllch rnuts or may rnut an- COlllarlllnant$."

)
19. Section 6.7 of Rule 1080 spedfies thaI COMS must mtt1 the pel"fonnance SpecIficatIOns in 40

C.FR 60, Appendix B.

20. Perfonnance Spedfication 1 (Specifications and Test Procedures for Continuous OpacIty

Monnonng S)"IteITlS III Stationary Sources) of40 C.F.R. 60, Appendix B is applicable to the Facility's

COMS.

21, Section 8,1(4) of Performance Specification 1 re<;Juires the owner or operator ofa COMS to

oprnlte the COMS for "an initial 168-hour test period whik the source is operatlIlg under nonnal operating

condItIonS:'

22. SectIon 8.0 ofRuk 1080 requir<:s owners and operators to submIt a quarterly excess emissions

report for each continuous monitoring ')"Item ("CMS"). l1le report is requIred to include the tnne,

amount, and cause ofexcess emISSIons and any com:ch", actIOns taken. 1bc report must also llQIe the

date and tune ofeach period for which the CMS was inoperative, except for span checks, and the nature of

any repai"l or adjustments.

Regulatory Background

Tille V Pamit

23. Title V ofthe Act re<;JUlres major stationary sourccs ofalT pollution to obtam an operatmg pcmut

that includes enllssions 1l11ulations and such other conditIons as necessary to assure oomphllIlce WIth

applicabkre<;JuirementsoftheAet. See 42.U.S.C. "7661._766lf.

24. On May 3, 2004, the Oistnet renewed llIId reissued the fael1lty's T111e V operating permit (Tide V

Permit), whieh the Distril'1 had originally issued on July 15, 1998.

25, The Tule V Permit contains both general conditions of the Facility, idenllfied as "Facillty·",de

ReqUlrements," and umt-5peclfie condItions, idenhfied as "Permit Umt Rt>:luirements" for operalton of the

varioos emIssions umts at the faCIlity.

26. CondItIon 36 In the Facility-wide Requirements requires that Saint-Gobain "submit ccrtificahons

ofcompllllIlce. 10 the EPA annually.

4
27. Con(hhon 42 In the Faclht)'-Wlde ReqUll'mw:nlS stales thaI the "reporting pmods for the .

Comphaoce Cenlfical10n Report ("Annual ComphlllCC CertIfication" begin July 15 of every year .

These: are due .....tIun 30 days after the end of lhe reportmg pmod.

28. Sccuon S02(a) ofthe Acl otaleI that It IS llr'Ila""ful forany~ 10 YM>late any reqUI~1ofa

permlll-..ed pwmanl to Tille v ofthe Act. .2 U.s C.• 7661.0(1).

C. GENERAL AI I fGATJQNS

29. Samt.(;dmn is 1 tupotloon liJC(lIpooued m the Stale nflJelawve.

)0, AI all urnes rek>....t to IInsproceedlll& Salnl.Qobam "'as I '"pc:non~ as that Im1lI$defined In

SIXlKlll 302(e) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. §7602(e).

1 I Sa.,nt.(iobam ""n!; and operales the Faelltty, ....Iuch IS 1 gLus cnntalner manufaetunng operal1on

locaud II 24441 A\lCIt\1C 12 in Maden, Callfon"l.

32. The glass manufacturing process raults ,n emissions of air pollulallt5, including. bul nOl lil11lud

to, NOx, I'M 10, and SOx,

33. The FlClll1y has two glass melting furnaces, known as Fumace #1 and furnace #2.

34 The Facility has CQIllinuous monll(lfinll equIpment 10 mooit<w its emlJi,5ions of Ilr pol1uuon.

35 The Facihty lias a cOlIlinuous emlSSIOll rale mooltoringli)lSlem ("CERMS., lhallTOCtiUl'CS NOll

levels &om Furnace 112.

16 Thc Faeilny has two tulllnUOU:ll crrtI-SSlOll monnonng S)'SlCrnS ("CEMS"1, one on the scrubber

",lee Irld one on the scrubber oullet. lhIl trnsurn SO:< kvels from 1 stxk thaI comb",oCS the enus:s>ortS of

bod! FlIrt\ICC ..I and Fumace 112.

17. Thc Fae,I,tyhasonc: COMS whIcb measurcsopKl1)'kvell from 1 Slaek thai combmes the

mu_ofbod! Fumaa: itl and Furnace 112.

19. The mtISSKl11S nnlllonng equlpmenl described In paragraphs 3-4 through 37 became operalJonal In

March 2007.

,
o ALLEGED VIOLATIONS

COUNT I:

FA[LURE TO HAVE VALID MONITORING QC PLAN

39. Paragraphs 1 through 38 are reaHeged and mCOfpOOlted herem by reference.

4(1. On May 10. 2007, lOPA conducted an mspeenon Qf the Facility ("Site [nspectlon'').

41. During the Site lnspe<;tion, the EPA inspector asked Respondet1t to produce a QC Plan foc all Qf

tM Facility's contmuous monitoring equIpment. Respondet1t produced a QC Plan dated 2001 that dId nOi

include emissHlns monttormg equIpment that became operahooal m Man:h 2007.

42. Respondet1t violated sectIon 110 ofthe ACI and the California SIP by failin8to have a valid QC

plan for the CEMS and CERMS equtpmenllhat became operational m March 2007,

COUNT 2:

FAILURE TO CONOUer DAlLY CALIBRATION DRIFf

43. Paragraphs I through 38 are realltge<! and mcorporated herem by ",ference.

44. On or about July 30, 2007, the Facilitysent EPA an e~cess emission report ("EER") for !he second

quarter of1007 ("2Q 2007 EER).

4S. The 2Q 2007 fER mcludes momloong downtime tables indicatmg when the Faclhtypcrfonned

daily calibrations for one SO~ mOllltor.

46. According to the"" tables, Respondent failed to perform daily calibralloos for one SO~ monnor

from April I through April 2S and from May 19 through May 23. 2007.

47. On at [ea,;! April I through April 2S IUId May [9 through May 23, 2007, Respondet1t violated

se<::tion IlO of the Act and Ihe California SIP by failing 10 conduct an assessment ohhe d.tlyca[ibratloo

drift for one of its SO~ monitors as required by Sectioo 8.0 of Rule 1080 and its ATCs.

COUNf3

FAILURE TO PROPERLY CERTIFY CaMS

48, P.ragraphs I through 38 are realleged and incmporated herein by reference.

49, On or about April 13,2007. Respondem sent EPA a cenification report for the COMS inst.lled Qf1

6
lhe Furn.a"" #2 ~xhauSl Slack ("'COMS Certlficauon Report"). Respondent SUltw that th~ report

··d~monstmt~s th~ COMS rnttls lhe requi=ts of4ll CFR 60, Appendix B, Performance Spc<:lficallon

I."

50. Acoording to the COMS Certification Report, dated April 13,2007, Respondent conducted

operatIonal testing at th~ Facility bctw«n March 10 and March 17, 2007.

51. During Ihis operational teshng period, Fumac~ #2 was in start_up mod~, not normal operating

conditions, baso:I on a summary of the Furna"" #2 stan-up proc~ss provided by Respondent 10 EPA.

According to this summary, Respondent began to h~at Furnace #2 on March 7, 2007, and conlinued the

start-up process unlil March 14, 2007, when the oxy.fu~l burners were fired for the first time

52. Respondent failed 10 pro~lycertify th~ COMS ~auS" it did nQl conduct opttationaltesting

whll~ Fumatt #2 was operating und.... normal operatingcondllions as required by &etion 8.1(4) in 4ll

C.F.R. Pan 60, Appendix B, P....fonnan"" Spc<:ification I.

53. Respondent violated section 110 oflh~ Act and th~ California SIP for failing to cOlTectly certify

the COMS, as required by Section 6.7 ofRul~ 1080 and its A TCs.

COUNT 4

FAILURE TO SUBMIT ACCURATE AND COMPLETE EXCESS EMISSION REPORTS

54. Paragraphs 1 lhrough 38 ar~ real1~ged and tnCOTpOIllled herein by rdcn:nc~,

55. On or about April 30, 2007. th~ Facility senl EPA an EER for the firsl quart.... of2007 ("IQ 2007

EER).

56, The IQ 2007 EER reponed that the COMS was oo"n from 7:00 10 15:00 on March 10, 2007.

After the Sit~ Inspection, ho"",,,vcr, Respondent submitted data' to EPA showing that lh~ COMS was do"",,

from 7:00 to 8:00 and from 14:00 to 15:00 for a total oftv."O, nOI eight hours as rq>Ot'1ed in lh~ IQ 2007

EER.

I Fil~ providod by R~.<pOndenl VIa email Ifle' the Sue Inspection {m file 1ll1ed "EP Emission Ind Downl"""

Repon 02-2007xb'l

7
57. The lQ 2007 EER rqx>rlcd thaI the COMS was down from 6:00 to 17:00 00 March 27, 2007

After the SlIe InspectlOO, howe'"Cr, Respondent sul,muned data' 10 EPA showing that the COMS was down

from 6:00 10 8:00, from 12:00 10 14:00. and from 15:00 to 16:00, for a 10lal ofseven, not eleven hours as

reported in the lQ 2007 EER.

58. On March 7 and 13.2007, ermssions from Fwnace #1 were 4.1 Iblton.' Rule 4354 limllS the

Furnace #1 em,SS'onS to 4.0 Ib/lon. The lQ 2007 EER dId not ,nclude these two daY" ofemission

exceedanoxs.

59. TIle FacIlity has two SOx monitors-one at the inlet ofthe scrobber, and one at the oullet ofthe

scrubber al lhe Facility. Thc IQ 2007 EER and Ihc 2Q 2007 EER, howcver. included thc requIred

informallon for only one of the SOX monitors atlhe Facility.

60. Respondent violated section 110 ofthe ACI and the Califomia SIP by failing 10 submitlll:curate

and complete FERs for lQ and 2Q 2007 as required by Section 8.0 of Rule 1080 and its ATCs.

COUNf5

FAILURE TO SUBMIT TIMELY TITLE V CERTIFICATION

61. Parogr.>phs I thmugh 38 are rcalleged and incorpomted herein by reference.

62. Condllion 42 of the Title V Perml1 reqUIred Respondent 10 submil an Annual Compliance

Cc:nlficalion for the FlIl:illty no later than August 30, 2()()tj.

63. Respondenl subminal the Facility's Annual Compliance Certificalion rqx>rl for the period ofJuly

15,2005 to July 14, 2006 on or aboul February 14, 2007.

64. Respondent failed to subnm a timely annual compliance cert,fical,on covering July 2oo5-July

2006 as required by its Tille V permil.

65. Respondent violated Section 502 Oflhe Act and Condiuoo 42 of the Facihty-wide Requirement'

of its Title V pemut by falhng 10 t,mely subm\tlts Annual Comphance Ccrtificatioo ror lhe tnne pcnod of

, Fjle providro by Re'pondent via en:Ilil ofler tbe S,lt Inspection em file titled "EP Elt1IS'ion and Do",ntuoc

Rcpon 02-2007.xln

8
July 15, 2005 to July 14, 2006.

E. RESPONDENT'S ADMISSIONS

66. In acc<:>r<\arltt with 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(bX2) and for th<: purpose of this proc«ding, Respondent (i)

adTtUlS that EPA has Jurisdiction over tM subject man... ofthls CAFO and over Respondent: ('i) neithcc

admn. nor demes the specific factual allegations and the other allegations contained in Section I.C of thIS

CAFO; (iii) consents to any and all conditions specified m this CAFO, including the assessment ofthe

c,vil administrative penally under Section I.f ofthis CAFO: (IV) W3ives any right to contest the allegations

con\lllned in this CAfO; and (v) waives the right to appeal the proposed final ardercontaincd in this

CAFO.

f. CIVIL ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY

67. Respondent h=byconsents to the assessment ofa civil penally in the amount ofONE

HUNDRED THIRTY-"'INE THOUSAND FNE HUNDRED TIIIRTY.fOUR OOLLARS ($139,534) as

full, final, and complete settlemmt of its liabllily for the civil danns alleged in Section D. of this CAFO.

Respondent shall pay this penally within 30 days oftlle effective date ofthis CAFO Payment shall be

made bycashicc's orcenified check pa}'llble to the '1'reasurer, United States ofAmerica," and shall be

sent by certified mail, retum reeeipt requested, to the following addrns:

U.S. Environmental Protectioo Agmcy

Fines and Penalties

Cincmnati Finance Cmtcc

P.O. Box 979077

Samt Louis. MO 63197-9000

The payment shall be accompanied by a transmit\llilelt... identIfYing the case name, the ease docket

number, and th,sCAFO. Concurrent with delivery ofthe payment of the penally, Respondmt shall send a

copy ofthe check and transm,ttal letter to the follOWIng addresse",

, A<:<:ordmg to dm obtained during the Site Inspection (& file ti~<d '"T.nk t Daily 1.08 2OM.xls"),

9
Regional Hearing Clerk

Office QfReg,onal Counsel (ORC-l)

U,S. Envuonmental Protection Agency, Region IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San FTlIJ1cisco. CA 94105

Cynt,a Sl<:mer

Air Division (A1R·5)

U,S. Envuonmental Proteellon Agency, Region IX

75 Hawthorne Strect

San Francisco, CA 94105

Payment ofthe above c,,,,1 admmistrat,~ penalty shall not be used by Respondent or any other person as a

tax deduction from Respondent·s fedcntl, state, or local taxes.

68. If Respondent fall. to pay !he Civil admmistrati,"C penalty WIthin 30 daY" ofthe cffectl~ date of

this CAFO, then Respondent shall pay 10 EPA tIM: CIvil adnumstrah~ penalty of ONE HUNDRED

NINETY-ONE ,HOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY-TWO DOLLARS ($191,372) mstead of

the agreed upon penalty sum specified in paragraph 67 immediately. In addnion, fail= to pay tIM: civil

administrative penalty may lead tQ any Qr all ofthe following action"

a. The debt hc1ng refctred to a credit reportmg agency. a ooll""tion agency, Qr tQ 11M:

Dcparunent ofJustice for filing ofa oolleetion action in the appropriate Unlled States Dim;ct Coun. 40

C.F.R. §§ 13.l3, 13,14, and 13.33. In any such cQlleeti"" aClion, tM vahdity, amount, and appropriateness

ofthc assesse<l penalty and of thIS CAFO shall nOi be subject to review.

b, "The debt being collected by administrative Qffset (i.e.• the withholding of money payable

by tIM: United States to, or held by the United States for, a person \Q satisfy the debt the person QWes the

G<>vemment), which includes, but i. nQtlimited to. referral to the Internal Revenue Service for offS<'!

agamst mcome tax refunds. 40 C.F.R. Pan 13, Subpans C and 11.

c. EPA may (i) suspend or revoke Respondent's licenses or other pn",legd; or(;,) suspend

or dtsquallfY Respondent from doing business with EPA or engagmg in pmgnuru; EPA sponsors or funds.

4llC.F.R.§ ]),]7,

to
d, In accordancc with thc Debt CollcctlOn Act of 1982 and 40 C.F.R. Part 13, int"",s1,

penalties charges, and admimstrat",,, COSIS WIll be assessed again$! the outstanding amount that

Respondent owes to EPA for Respondent's failure to pay the CIvil adminiSlnltive penalty Wlthm the

deadline specified in p.aragr.lph 61. Interest wl!l be assessed at an annual rate that is e<jual to the rate of

current V'illue offunds to Ihe Umted States TreasllJY (i.e" the Treasury laX and loan account rale) as

prescribed and published by the Secretary ofthe Treasury in the Federal Register and the Treasury FIscal

ReqUIrements Manual Bulle'lins. 40 C-F.R. § 13.11(aXI). Penalty c~will be assessed monlhlyat a

rate of6% per annum. 40 C-F.R. § 13.11(c). Administrative costs for handhng and collecting

Respond,,"I's overdue debl will be based on either actual or average co$! incurred, and will Include both

direct and indirect costs. 40 C.F.R. § 13.11 (b). In add'llon, IfIhls matler '" referred to another d"J'lnment

or ag,,"ey (e.g., the Department ofJustice, the Inlernal Revenue ServIce), lhal departmmt or ag,,"cy may

assess its own administrative eosls, in addition to EPA's administrntive costs. for handling and collecling

Respondent's overdue debt

G. RETENTION OF RIGHTS

69. In aoxordance with 40 CF.R. § 22.18{e), this CAFO only resolves Respond,,"!'s liability for

federal civil penalties for the violations and facts specifically all~ in Sections IC and 1.0 ofthisCAFO

and in Ihe Notice ofYiolation dated September 1, 2007, Nothing in this CAFO is intended to or shall be

constn>ed 10 resolve (i) any civil liability for violations of any provision of any federal, SIlII", or local law,

statute, regulation, rule, ordinance, or pennit nOi specifically all~ m SectIon I.C artci l.D ofthlS CAFO

and in the NOilce of YlOlalton dated September 7, 2001; or (ii) any cnminalliablhly, EPA specifically

reserves any and all authontles, rights. and remedies available to it (including, but nOllimited to, IllJunetive

or Other eqUItable reliefor criminal sanctions) to address any VIOlatIon of thIS CAFO or any vlOlahon not

spe<:ifically alleged In SectIon I.C and 1.0 of this CAFO and In the Notice ofYiolation daled September 7,

2007.

II
70. ThIs CAfO not exempt, ~h~, m'xllfy, or .ffft:! in lilly WlIy Re:<por>dmfs dutytoCOll1lly

""Ih allllpphCllb~ f~L 5!3te, iU1d 10000llaws. regullllOlll. rules. ordinantC$, and pcnnltl.

H. AlTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS

71 Each put)' shall bear 11l0Y01l IUCImC)'I' rea. cosu, and chsbun;cmcnu ,ocurnd In thIS plocccdmg.

I. EFFECTIVE DATE

71. In _dailiX with 40 C.f.R. it 22.18(b)(3) and 22J l(b), du,CAFO shall bccff«u~ llIIlbc

date thallbc fmal anIcr cuntamed m thu CAfO. haVllll bcm appovcd lIIId issued by tither !he RcporW

JudICIal otfoccr or Rqponal Adnunl~tor.IS flied,

J. BINDING EFFECT

7) The und....igned rcprcsalllll"e ofComplallllnt and the undersigned reprc$CT11111\'C ofRc:spondcnt

each o;mlfics that he or she IS fully luthon:.oed to enter Into the tcrm!l and rond1U<.mS ofmls CAFO and to

bInd ,he party he. or she represents to th" CAFO.

74. The provisions of this CAPO shall apply to and be bindmg upon ResPQndent and ns offiCl."1"S,

d,=tors, employees, agents, trustees, servants, authorized representatives,~, and assigns,

12
fOR SAINT-GOBAINCONTAINERS, INC:

.4u: ,,3;-"poi'"

DATE ;

fOR COMPLAINANT EPA REGION IX:

hI/.

Deborah

~----&_ Jordan

Din:ctor

Air Division

United Slates EnvironITl"nlal

Protection Agency, RCgiOllIX

75 Hawthorne Street

San francisco, Cahfomla 94105
II. fiNAL ORDER

EPA Region [X and Samt-Gobain Contamers, Inc., haVIng entered into Ihe foregoing Consent

Ag=mtnt, b1

IT [S HEREBY ORDERED thaI this CAfO (Docket No. CAAf-200r!J 0 ~~entered. and

Respondent Samt.(Jobain Contam=. Inc., shall pay a ciVIl admmistrnhve penalty in the amount of

S139.S34, and olherw,sc comply WIth the terms!iel forth in Ihe CAfD.

DATE
CERTI.'ICATE 0)<' SERVICE

I hereby certify thai on lhe original copy of lhe foregoing CONSE.'IT

AGREEMENT and ANAL ORDER "-as filed "'ith the Regional Hearing Clerk. Region IX and

1M a copy W1lS sent via US. 1.131110:

Mr. Joseph Grewe

Presidenl & CEO

Salnt-Gobain Conla,nen..Inc.

1509 South Maeedonia A\-cnue

MunciC'. IN 47307

John W. Carroll. Esq.

Suile 200

100 Markel Slnxl

P.O. Box 1181

Harrisburg,PA 17108,1181

Dale: SEP 2 9 N"

Office of Regional Coonst:l

U.S. EPA. Region IX