alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 178.819 Vibration test. ( a ) *General.* The vibration test must be conducted for the qualification of all rigid IBC design types. Flexible IBC design types must be capable of withstanding the vibration test.
( b ) *Test method.* ( 1 ) A sample IBC, selected at random, must be filled and closed as for shipment. IBCs intended for liquids may be tested using water as the filling material for the vibration test.
( 2 ) The sample IBC must be placed on a vibrating platform with a vertical or rotary double-amplitude (peak-to-peak displacement) of one inch. The IBC must be constrained horizontally to prevent it from falling off the platform, but must be left free to move vertically and bounce.
( 3 ) The test must be performed for one hour at a frequency that causes the package to be raised from the vibrating platform to such a degree that a piece of material of approximately 1.6-mm (0.063-inch) thickness (such as steel strapping or paperboard) can be passed between the bottom of the IBC and the platform. Other methods at least equally effective may be used (see § 178.801(i)).
( c ) *Criteria for passing the test.* An IBC passes the vibration test if there is no rupture or leakage.
[Amdt. 178-103, 59 FR 38074, July 26, 1994, as amended by Amdt. 178-108, 60 FR 40038, Aug. 4, 1995; Amdt. 178-110, 60 FR 49111, Sept. 21, 1995; 66 FR 45386, Aug. 28, 2001; 75 FR 5397, Feb. 2, 2010]
| Andrew      J. Kohut          | President      & Chief Executive Officer                          | $570,000      | January      1, 2007 |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|----------------------|
| Joel      K. Mostrom          | Executive      Vice President & Chief Financial Officer           | $340,000      | July      24, 2007   |
| J.P.      Causey Jr.          | Executive      Vice President, Secretary & General Counsel        | $292,000      | January      1, 2007 |
| Michael      Cheetham (1)     | Vice      President – Pharmaceutical & Healthcare Packaging | £180,000 | July      24, 2007   |
| Timothy      D. Whitfield (2) | Vice      President – Branded Products Packaging                | £146,400 | July      24, 2007   |

| Andrew      J. Kohut      | President      & Chief Executive Officer                          | 68,900 |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Joel      K. Mostrom      | Executive      Vice President & Chief Financial Officer           | 29,800 |
| J.P.      Causey Jr.      | Executive      Vice President, Secretary & General Counsel        | 25,600 |
| Michael      Cheetham     | Vice      President – Pharmaceutical & Healthcare Packaging | 25,400 |
| Timothy      D. Whitfield | Vice      President – Branded Products Packaging                | 20,600 |
-----Original Message----- 

From: handsomehanson@hotmail.com [mailto:handsomehanson@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:29 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Steven Hanson 

10319 Leawood Blvd 

Houston, TX 77099
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Fitzpatrick, Overton and Senior Judge Hodges Argued at Salem, Virginia

CITY OF ROANOKE MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 2643-95-3 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON JULY 2, 1996 RONALD F. RENICK

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION Steven J. Talevi, Assistant City Attorney (Wilburn C. Dibling, Jr., City Attorney, on briefs), for appellant. Mary L. Poletti (Brumberg, Mackey & Wall, P.L.C., on brief), for appellee.

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. The Workers' Compensation Commission awarded benefits to the claimant, Ronald F. Renick, for his condition of esophageal motility disorder resulting from extreme stress in his employment. Renick's employer appeals, challenging both the classification of his condition as an occupational disease and the causal link to his employment. The parties are fully conversant with the record to this case, and a recitation of the facts is unnecessary to this memorandum opinion. Renick's condition was established as a disease. All medical records as well as the medical literature demonstrate that the treating doctors as well as the medical community believe this to be a disease. This classification is a medical- 2 - issue to be decided by the trier of fact based on evidence at the hearing. Knott v. Blue Bell, Inc. , 7 Va. App. 335, 338, 373 S.E.2d 481, 483 (1988). Renick's employment caused the stress that triggered his condition. No other source of stress was noted or argued by either doctors or counsel. The treating specialists ruled out other causes and came to the conclusion that stress caused his condition. "[A] determination of causation is a factual finding." Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Musick , 7 Va. App. 684, 688, 376 S.E.2d 814, 817 (1989). We find that credible evidence supports the commission's findings, and we will not disturb them on appeal. The decision of the commission is affirmed. Affirmed.
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**
**FAA -**  **2015 -**  **2906** Docket Number
**2014 -**  **SW -**  **068 -** **AD** Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Timken T - 700 Service Bulletin, Revision B, dated October 20, 2014.


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. a nd 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
December 21, 1978

Judges—Members of Congress—Constitutional

Restriction on Appointment (Article I, § 6, cl. 2)—

Omnibus Judgeship Bill (28 U.S.C. § 133, as

amended)

This responds to your inquiry concerning any legal restriction against the 

appointment of former or sitting Members of Congress to civil offices created 

by Congress at the time such persons were Congressmen. Specifically, the 

issue concerns the appointment of former members of the 95th Congress to the 

new judgeships created by the Omnibus Judgeship Bill; 28 U.S.C. § 133, as 

amended by 92 Stat. 1630.

The relevant legal provision is Article 1, § 6, cl. 2, of the Constitution:

No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he 

was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of 

the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments 

whereof shall have been increased during such time; and no Person 

holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of 

either House during his Continuance in Office.

This provision poses no obstacle with respect to any current member of the 

House of Representatives since each member’s term will expire, under the 

Twentieth Amendment, at noon on January 3, 1979.1 The same cannot be said 

for each current Senator. A Senator is, under the Seventeenth Amendment, 

elected for a term of 6 years. However, under the Constitution, Article 1, § 3, 

cl. 2, the terms of Senators are staggered so that one-third are chosen every 

second year. Accordingly, only those whose terms expire at noon on January 3,

1979, will be eligible under Article 1, § 6, cl. 2, for appointment to the subject

78-99 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE COUNSEL

TO THE PRESIDENT

'Even if a member of the House of Representatives were reelected to a new term in the past 

election he would not be disqualified for appointment to one of the judgeships because the judgeships were created during the term expiring at noon on January 3. 1979. the term that constitutes 

the period of disqualification.

431
judgeships at that time. While other Senators will not be eligible in 1979 for 

appointment to the judgeships, their disqualification will lapse upon the 

expiration of their elected terms.

J o h n M . H a r m o n

Assistant Attorney General

Office o f Legal Counsel

432
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.18 How to notify PHMSA. ( a ) An operator must provide any notification required by this part by— ( 1 ) Sending the notification by electronic mail to *InformationResourcesManager@dot.gov ;* or
( 2 ) Sending the notification by mail to ATTN: Information Resources Manager, DOT/PHMSA/OPS, East Building, 2nd Floor, E22-321, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590.
( b ) An operator must also notify the appropriate State or local pipeline safety authority when an applicable pipeline segment is located in a State where OPS has an interstate agent agreement, or an intrastate applicable pipeline segment is regulated by that State.
( c ) Unless otherwise specified, if an operator submits, pursuant to § 192.8, § 192.9, § 192.13, § 192.179, § 192.319, § 192.461, § 192.506, § 192.607, § 192.619, § 192.624, § 192.632, § 192.634, § 192.636, § 192.710, § 192.712, § 192.714, § 192.745, § 192.917, § 192.921, § 192.927, § 192.933, or § 192.937, a notification for use of a different integrity assessment method, analytical method, compliance period, sampling approach, pipeline material, or technique (*e.g.,* “other technology” or “alternative equivalent technology”) than otherwise prescribed in those sections, that notification must be submitted to PHMSA for review at least 90 days in advance of using the other method, approach, compliance timeline, or technique. An operator may proceed to use the other method, approach, compliance timeline, or technique 91 days after submitting the notification unless it receives a letter from the Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety informing the operator that PHMSA objects to the proposal or that PHMSA requires additional time and/or more information to conduct its review.
[Amdt. 192-125, 84 FR 52244, Oct. 1, 2019, as amended by Amdt. 192-129, 86 FR 63298, Nov. 15, 2021; Amdt. 192-130, 87 FR 20982, Apr. 8, 2022; Amdt. 192-132, 87 FR 52268, Aug. 24, 2022]
#### § 176.112 Applicability.

The provisions of §§ 176.116(e), 176,118, and 176.120 of this subpart do not apply to Division 1.4 (explosive) materials, compatibility group S. Such materials may be stowed together with all other Class 1 (explosive) materials except those of compatibility group A or L. They must be segregated from other hazardous materials in accordance with table 176.83(b) of this part.

[Amdt. 176-30, 55 FR 52696, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 66 FR 45384, Aug. 28, 2001]
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Champion Industries, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending October 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we,
Marshall T. Reynolds, Todd R. Fry and Kirby J. Taylor, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer,
respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| |  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                               
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|    |  |                                           
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/Marshall T. Reynolds                   
|    |  |                                           
|    |  | Marshall T. Reynolds                      
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer                   
|    |  |                                           
|By: |  | /s/ Todd R. Fry                           
|    |  |                                           
|    |  | Todd R. Fry                               
|    |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|    |  |                                           
|By: |  | /s/ Kirby J. Taylor                       
|    |  |                                           
|    |  | Kirby J. Taylor                           
|    |  | President and Chief Operating Officer     

A signed copy of this written statement required by section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request

Date: January 19, 2004
#### § 179.220-20 Reinforcements, when used, and appurtenances not otherwise specified.

All attachments to inner container and outer shell must be applied by approved means.

[Amdt. 179-9, 36 FR 21342, Nov. 6, 1971]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2048 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2048

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                  coastwise trade for the vessel BABS.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 17, 1995

  Mr. Gekas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                  coastwise trade for the vessel BABS.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel BABS (United States 
official number 1030028).
                                 <all>
```
#### The Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank, *Respondent, v.*Thomas J. Clute, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 24.14
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned,  as President of West Texas Utilities  Company (the "Company"),
hereby  makes,  constitutes  and appoints R.  Russell  Davis his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power and authority to execute in the name
and on behalf  of the  undersigned,  in any and all  capacities,  the  Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1996 and any and all  amendments  thereto,  to be
filed under the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as  amended,  and any other
documents and  instruments  incidental  thereto,  and to file the same, with all
exhibits thereto and all documents in connection therewith,  with the Securities
and Exchange Commission,  hereby granting to such  attorney-in-fact,  and agent,
full power and authority of substitution and revocation in the premises and full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary  to be done in and about the  premises,  as fully for all  intents and
purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person and hereby ratifying and
confirming all that such  attorney-in-fact and agent, may do or cause to be done
by virtue of this Power of Attorney.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have hereunto  executed this Power of Attorney this 28th
day of January, 1997.


                                                     Floyd W. Nickerson
                                                     President





Subscribed and sworn to before me this 28th day of January, 1997 by Floyd W.
Nickerson.

                                                     Martha Murray
                                                     Notary Public

My Commission Expires:
11-19-00
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 11431 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
VINCENT DANIEL FANUS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:18

- CR

- 6

- 25

Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Vincent Daniel Fanus has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Fanus h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed couns el’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 20, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-11431 Document: 00515004191 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2019No. 18

- 11431

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excu sed from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-11431 Document: 00515004191 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2019
#### § 1243.3 Report of fuel cost, consumption, and surcharge revenue.

Commencing with reports for the 3 months beginning October 1, 2007, all Class I railroads are required to file quarterly a Report of Fuel Cost, Consumption, and Surcharge Revenue, in accordance with the Board's reporting form. Such reports shall be submitted, in paper or electronically, to the Office of Economics, Surface Transportation Board, Washington, DC, within 30 days after the end of the quarter reported.

# Appendix to Section 49 CFR 1243.3

OMB Control No. 2140-0014

Expires \_\_\_\_, 2010

### Railroad Name \_\_\_\_\_\_

Quarterly Report of Fuel Cost, Consumption, and Surcharge Revenue for the Quarter Ending \_\_\_\_, 20\_\_

[Instructions: The report shall contain data only for the reported quarter. Cost and revenue are defined as accrued or earned that quarter. The report shall be filed with the Surface Transportation Board on or before 30 days after the end of that quarter.]

| Line No. | Data (a) | Amount (in thousands) (b) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Total fuel cost1 | |
| 2 | Total gallons of fuel consumed1 | |
| 3 | Total increase or decrease in cost of fuel2 | |
| 4 | Total revenue from fuel surcharges3 | |
| 5 | Revenue from fuel surcharges on regulated traffic | |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Include fuel for freight, yard and work train locomotives. Include fuel charged to train and yard service (function 67—Locomotive Fuels). Include all other fuel used for railroad operations and maintenance, including motor vehicles and power equipment not charged to function 67—Locomotive Fuels. | | |
| 2 Show the total increase or decrease in fuel cost over previous quarter. | | |
| 3 Show Fuel surcharges billed for all traffic (line 4) and for only regulated traffic (line 5). | | |

I, the undersigned, \_\_\_\_\_\_, Title: \_\_\_\_\_\_, state that this report was prepared by me or under my supervision and that I have carefully examined it and on the basis of my knowledge, belief, and verification declare it to be full, true and correct.

# Supplemental Information About the Fuel Surcharge Report

The following information is provided in compliance with OMB requirements, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, [44 U.S.C. 3501](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/44/3501) *et seq.:*

Information in this report is intended to permit the Board to monitor the fuel surcharge practices of Class I carriers.

The estimated annual hourly, per respondent burden for filing this report is 12 hours.

This report is mandatory for Class I carriers.

Information collected through this report is published on the Board's website and is maintained by the agency for at least 2 years.

The display of a currently valid OMB control number for this collection is required by law. Under [5 CFR 1320.5(b)](/on/2024-09-24/title-5/section-1320.5#p-1320.5(b)), persons are not required to respond to this collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

[[72 FR 45386](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/72-FR-45386), Aug. 14, 2007, as amended at [81 FR 8856](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/81-FR-8856), Feb. 23, 2016]
§ 209.401 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The purpose of this subpart is to prevent accidents and casualties arising from the operation of a railroad that result from a railroad's failure to remedy certain violations of the Federal railroad safety laws for which assessment of a civil penalty has been recommended.
( b ) To achieve this purpose, this subpart requires that if an FRA Safety Inspector notifies a railroad both that assessment of a civil penalty will be recommended for its failure to comply with a provision of the Federal railroad safety laws and that a remedial actions report must be submitted, the railroad shall report to the FRA Safety Inspector, within 30 days after the end of the calendar month in which such notification is received, actions taken to remedy that failure.
( c ) This subpart does not relieve the railroad of the underlying responsibility to comply with a provision of the Federal railroad safety laws. The 30-day period after the end of the calendar month in which notification is received is intended merely to provide the railroad with an opportunity to prepare its report to FRA, and does not excuse continued noncompliance.
( d ) This subpart requires the submission of remedial actions reports for the general categories of physical defects, recordkeeping and reporting violations, and filing violations, where the railroad can literally and specifically correct a failure to comply with a provision of the Federal railroad safety laws, as reasonably determined by the FRA Safety Inspector. No railroad is required to submit a report for a failure involving either a completed or past transaction or a transaction that it can no longer remedy.