alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 190
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 190 appear at 78 FR 58908, Sept. 25, 2013.

§ 190.9 Petitions for finding or approval. ( a ) In circumstances where a rule contained in parts 192, 193 and 195 of this chapter authorizes the Administrator to make a finding or approval, an operator may petition the Administrator for such a finding or approval.
( b ) Each petition must refer to the rule authorizing the action sought and contain information or arguments that justify the action. Unless otherwise specified, no public proceeding is held on a petition before it is granted or denied. After a petition is received, the Administrator or participating state agency notifies the petitioner of the disposition of the petition or, if the request requires more extensive consideration or additional information or comments are requested and delay is expected, of the date by which action will be taken. ( 1 ) For operators seeking a finding or approval involving intrastate pipeline transportation, petitions must be sent to: ( i ) The State agency certified to participate under 49 U.S.C. 60105.
( ii ) Where there is no state agency certified to participate, the Administrator, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590.
( 2 ) For operators seeking a finding or approval involving interstate pipeline transportation, petitions must be sent to the Administrator, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590.
( c ) All petitions must be received at least 90 days prior to the date by which the operator requests the finding or approval to be made.
( d ) The Administrator will make all findings or approvals of petitions initiated under this section. A participating state agency receiving petitions initiated under this section shall provide the Administrator a written recommendation as to the disposition of any petition received by them. Where the Administrator does not reverse or modify a recommendation made by a state agency within 10 business days of its receipt, the recommended disposition shall constitute the Administrator's decision on the petition.
[Amdt. 190-5, 59 FR 17280, Apr. 12, 1994, as amended by Amdt. 190-6, 61 FR 18513, Apr. 26, 1996; 70 FR 11137, Mar. 8, 2005; 73 FR 16566, Mar. 28, 2008]
CARROLL.

#### Lucy *& a. v.*Gray.

The recitals in a personal property mortgage, that the articles mortgaged are personal estate, estop the mortgagor from claiming that they are real estate, as against the mortgagee.

*152The mortgagor having actively participated in the foreclosure sale under a personal property mortgage, without objecting to the proceedings, is estopped to say that some of the mortgaged articles sold were not legally advertised.

Trover., for a saw-mill and machinery. Facts found by a referee. The plaintiffs having built a saw-mill on Garland’s land, under a parol agreement with him, and put machinery in it, gave the Belknap Savings Bank a personal property mortgage of the mill and machinery to secure their note to the bank. The machinery was so attached to the mill as to become a part of it. The bank began a foreclosure of the mortgage by posting notices of a sale of the property, and serving a copy on the plaintiffs. The notices enumerated the mill and all the machinery mentioned in the mortgage, except a lathe and a jointer. The plaintiffs were present at the time and place of the sale, and took an active part in showing the mill and machinery to the bidders. The defendant was there as the agent of the bank. He authorized the auctioneer to sell and the purchaser to take the property covered by the mortgage; and it was sold together to one purchaser. The plaintiffs did not object that the lathe and the jointer were not advertised.

*J. H.*Hobbs, for the plaintiffs.

*G. W. M. Pitman*and *H. A. Hibbard,*for the defendant.

Stanley, J.

The defendant was the agent of the bank in the sale of the mortgaged property, and could rightfully do whatever was reasonably necessary to make a profitable sale. *Goodale*v. *Wheeler,*11 N. H. 424. If he kept within his legitimate authority, his title was the bank’s title, and any defence the bank could make he can avail himself of,.as its agent. As against the bank, the plaintiffs are estopped to say that the property mortgaged was not personal estate, as they represented it to be in the mortgage. *Ballou*v. *Jones,*37 Ill. 95; *Williams*v. *Swetland,*10 Iowa 51; *Libbey*v. *Pierce,*47 N. H. 309, 314. Whether it would be so considered as between the bank and Garland, it is not necessary to decide.

As the plaintiffs stood by and allowed the lathe and the jointer to be sold without objecting, or suggesting that those articles had not been legally advertised, they cannot now be heard to make that objection. Knowing that it was proposed to sell all the property mentioned in the mortgage, actively engaging in promoting the sale, and at the same time remaining silent as to a prior irregularity in the proceedings, they cannot equitably take advantage, after the sale, of the supposed defect. *Gurnsey*v. *Edwards,*26 *153N. H. 224. 231; *Davis*v. Handy, 37 N. H. 65, 71; *Wells*v. Pierce, 27 N. H. 503, 510, 511.

*Judgment for the defendant.*

Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         (80,000)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  342,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               822,000
<PP&E>                                      25,066,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,033,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,943,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     829,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,943,000
<SALES>                                      2,842,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,842,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,922,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (80,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (80,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (80,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.463 External corrosion control: Cathodic protection. ( a ) Each cathodic protection system required by this subpart must provide a level of cathodic protection that complies with one or more of the applicable criteria contained in appendix D of this part. If none of these criteria is applicable, the cathodic protection system must provide a level of cathodic protection at least equal to that provided by compliance with one or more of these criteria.
( b ) If amphoteric metals are included in a buried or submerged pipeline containing a metal of different anodic potential— ( 1 ) The amphoteric metals must be electrically isolated from the remainder of the pipeline and cathodically protected; or
( 2 ) The entire buried or submerged pipeline must be cathodically protected at a cathodic potential that meets the requirements of appendix D of this part for amphoteric metals.
( c ) The amount of cathodic protection must be controlled so as not to damage the protective coating or the pipe.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANN MARIE SANDS and WILLIAM J. SANDS,

Appellants,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D16-692 and 4D16-693

[December 7, 2017]

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial 

Circuit, Palm Beach County; Glenn Kelley, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502013CF009053AXXXMB and 502013CF009053BXXXMB.

Jacob M. Noble, Palm Beach Gardens, for appellants.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard 

Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., LEVINE, J., and SINGHAL, RAAG, Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United Bancorporation of
Alabama, Inc. for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mitchell D. Staples, principal accounting officer of the Corporation, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

       (1).   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

       (2).   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Corporation.


Date: November 14, 2003                       By: /s/ Mitchell D. Staples
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Mitchell D. Staples
                                                  principal accounting officer
-----Original Message----- 

From: nick@acereprographics.com [mailto:nick@acereprographics.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:19 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

Mental illness is not a "choice." It's as serious as anything else. 

People need treatment. Please support the interim final rule under the 

Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction 

Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Nick Berezansky 

123 Washington Pl. 

Ridgewood, NJ 07450
EX 11.1 

CHESAPEAKE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK

for the three years ended December 31, 2000

(Amounts in millions, except for per share amounts)

|   | **2000**1999**1998Basic:   Weighted average number of common    shares outstanding
15.8
20.1
21.2Income (loss) from continuing    operations
$11.2
$46.1
$(2.4)Discontinued operations:   (Loss) income
(33.4)
10.6
36.4(Loss) gain on disposal of 
(43.6)
194.1
-Cumulative effect of accounting    change
-
-
13.3Extraordinary item
(1.5)
-
-Net (loss) income
$(67.3)
$250.8
$47.3Per share amount:   Earnings from continuing operations
$0.71
$2.29
$(0.11)Discontinued operations
(4.87)
10.19
1.71Cumulative effect of accounting    change
-
-
0.63Extraordinary item
(0.10)
-
-Earnings
$(4.26)
$12.48
$2.23Diluted:   Weighted average number of common    shares outstanding
15.8
20.1
21.2Net additional common shares    issuable upon exercise of dilutive options, determined by treasury stock method using the    average price
.2
.3
-Common shares, equivalents and other    potentially dilutive securities
16.0
20.4
21.2Income (loss) from continuing    operations
$11.2
$46.1
$(2.4)Discontinued operations:   (Loss) income
(33.4)
10.6
36.4(Loss) gain on disposal
(43.6)
194.1
-Cumulative effect of accounting    change
-
-
13.3Extraordinary item
(1.5)
-
-Net (loss) income
$(67.3)
$250.8
$47.3Per share amount:   Earnings from continuing operations
$0.70
$2.26
$(0.11)Discontinued operations
(4.81)
10.03
1.71Cumulative effect of accounting    change
-
-
0.63Extraordinary item
(0.09)
-
-Earnings
$(4.20)
$12.29
$2.23
 ****** |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET

98-2266.

#### In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Hein.
#### The Town of Cherry Creek, *Respondent, v.*Philip Decker, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on opinion of

Daniels, J.,

at Special Term.
-----Original Message----- 

From: jheiken@msn.com [mailto:jheiken@msn.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:15 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jon Heiken 

1357 Sproul Ave. 

Napa, CA 94559
Exhibit 12.01

                   CIPSCO INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                     
             COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                FOR THE FIVE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
                              (in thousands)



<TABLE>
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

                      1996       1995         1994        1993        1992
<S>               <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Net income. . . . $  80,057   $  72,015   $  83,954   $  85,498   $  72,499(c)

Add--Federal and
   state income
    taxes:
  Current (a) . .    50,414      37,696      33,582      41,320       5,380
  Deferred (net).     2,492      11,437      18,867      13,907      38,707
  Deferred
   investment
   tax credits, net  (3,349)     (3,361)     (3,367)     (3,366)     (3,336)
                  ---------   ---------    --------   ---------   ---------
                     49,557      45,772      49,082      51,861      40,751
Net income before
   income taxes. .  129,614     117,787     133,036     137,359     113,250

Add--Fixed charges
  Interest on
   long-term
   debt (b). . . .   31,409      31,168      31,164      32,823      35,534
  Interest on
   provision for
   revenue refunds        -           -           -           -        (803)
  Other interest. .   4,633         898         378         603         398
  Amortization of
   net debt premium,
   discount, expense
   and loss (b). . .  1,709       1,703       1,678       1,598         863
  Preferred stock
   dividends of
   subsidiary. . .    3,721       3,850       3,510       3,718       4,549
                  ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------
                     41,472      37,619      36,730      38,742      40,541

Earnings as
 defined . . . . . $171,086    $155,406    $169,766    $176,101    $153,791
                  =========   =========   =========   =========   =========

Fixed charges . .  $ 41,472    $ 37,619    $ 36,730    $ 38,742    $ 40,541
Adjustment to
 pre-tax basis . .    2,303       2,447       2,052       2,255       2,557
                  ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------
                  $ 43,775     $ 40,066    $ 38,782    $ 40,997    $ 43,098

Ratio of earnings
 to fixed charges
 adjusted to
 pre-tax basis .      3.91         3.88        4.38        4.30        3.57
                  =========   =========   =========   =========   =========

_________________________
</TABLE>
(a)  Federal portion and state portion are shown separately in Notes to
     Consolidated Financial Statements.
(b)  Combined as interest charges on long-term debt on Consolidated
     Statements of Income.
(c)  Includes revenues collected subject to refund.
#### Lester B. Faulkner, *Respondent, v.*Andrew McCurdy, *Appellant.*

— In case plaintiff stipulates to strike out the damages allowed, the judgment so modified is affirmed, with costs. If plaintiff does not so stipulate, the judgment is reversed as to damages and affirmed in all other respects, and a new trial is granted as to the amount of damages only ; and in case a new trial is had, if the amount of damages is reduced upon such new trial, the costs of this appeal shall be paid by the plaintiff, otherwise by the defendant. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the  annual report of Viropro, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: February 19, 2002                 By: /s/ Hugh Johnson

--------------------------------

Hugh Johnson, President
Editorial Note on Part 193
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

§ 193.2009 Rules of regulatory construction. ( a ) As used in this part: ( 1 ) *Includes* means including but not limited to;
( 2 ) *May* means is permitted to or is authorized to;
( 3 ) *May not* means is not permitted to or is not authorized to; and
( 4 ) Shall or must is used in the mandatory and imperative sense.
( b ) In this part: ( 1 ) Words importing the singular include the plural; and
( 2 ) Words importing the plural include the singular.
From: dorwendl@mtdata.com [mailto:dorwendl@mtdata.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:23 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

- Dorthee 

141 Montague Rd 

Wendell, MA 01379
-----Original Message----- 

From: kailin.chou@gmail.com [mailto:kailin.chou@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:11 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kailin Chou 

1144 Fairford Way 

San Jose, CA 95129
-----Original Message----- 

From: bronzegoddess@earthlink.net [mailto:bronzegoddess@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:46 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Claudia Cohen 

8 redwood 

Larkspur, CA 94939