alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Captive Nations Week, 2007 

Liberty is the path to lasting peace and the unalienable right of every man, woman, and child. During Captive Nations Week, we underscore our commitment to protecting human rights, advancing democracy and freedom, and ending tyranny across the globe.

Expanding freedom is a moral imperative, and today more people are free than ever before. Freedom is reaching around the world, and America is working side-by-side with new democracies in Liberia, Mauritania, Ukraine, Georgia, and Kyrgyzstan. The people of Kuwait held elections in which women were able to vote and run for office for the first time, and the elected parliament is exercising real influence with the government. We continue to stand firmly behind the citizens of Lebanon, Afghanistan, and Iraq as they defend their democratic gains against extremist enemies. Many are making great sacrifices for liberty, and they deserve our steadfast support.

While there is progress in freedom's advance, nations such as Belarus, Burma, Cuba, North Korea, Syria, Iran, Sudan, and Zimbabwe still oppress their citizens. My Administration recently created the Human Rights Defenders Fund to provide grants for the legal defense and medical expenses of democratic dissidents arrested or beaten by repressive governments. In addition, we have nearly doubled funding for democracy projects throughout the world. The American people believe that the flame for freedom burns in every human heart, and that light cannot be extinguished by governments, terrorists, or tyrants. During Captive Nations Week, we remember that human freedom is the key to achieving respect for all human rights. 

The Congress, by Joint Resolution approved July 17, 1959 (73 Stat. 212), has authorized and requested the President to issue a proclamation designating the third week in July of each year as “Captive Nations Week.”

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim July 15 through 21, 2007, as Captive Nations Week. I call upon the people of the United States to reaffirm our commitment to all those seeking liberty, justice, and self-determination. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this tenth day of July, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07–3442

Billing code 3195–01–P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 AND BY THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          5,053
<SECURITIES>                                   47,656         
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,685
<ALLOWANCES>                                      100
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               55,876 
<PP&E>                                          9,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                    784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                178,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16,870
<BONDS>                                       175,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                        35
<COMMON>                                           10
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  178,917
<SALES>                                         3,440 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                3,440
<CGS>                                           4,822         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  19,900 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                2,280
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              9,647
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (30,136)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (30,136)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                 (30,136)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (30.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (30.14)
        

</TABLE>
#### Troy and Boston Railroad Company, Appellant, v. Boston, Hoosac Tunnel and Western Railway Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
-----Original Message----- 

From: katyakennedy@aol.com [mailto:katyakennedy@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:56 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Katya Kennedy 

1120 6th st 

Golden, CO 80403
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Maxim C. W. Webb, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the annual report on Form 10-K of PICO Holdings, Inc. (the “Registrant”);


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.








Date: April 1, 2013








/s/ Maxim C. W. Webb


Maxim C.W. Webb


Chief Financial Officer
-----Original Message----- 

From: columbarius33@yahoo.com [mailto:columbarius33@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:25 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Derek Lovitch 

29 Woodland Rd 

Pownal, ME 04069
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 45437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3957]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Vaccine Design and Acute HIV 
Infection.
    Date: September 7, 2007.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Clayton C. Huntley, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID/DHHS, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2570, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#accfc4d9c2d8c0c9d5ecc2c5cdc5c882c2c5c482cbc3da"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9dfef5e8f3e9f1f8e4ddf3f4fcf4f9b3f3f4f5b3faf2eb">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Disease Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 8, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-3957 Filed 8-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,287,894
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  461,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      40,694,464
<DEPRECIATION>                            (19,420,398)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,314,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     27,303,653
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,314,884
<SALES>                                      2,426,731
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,464,885
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,658,131
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             662,123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                144,631
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   144,631
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 190
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 190 appear at 78 FR 58908, Sept. 25, 2013.

§ 190.337 Proceedings on petitions for reconsideration. ( a ) The Associate Administrator or the Chief Counsel may grant or deny, in whole or in part, any petition for reconsideration without further proceedings, except where a grant of the petition would result in issuance of a new final rule. In the event that the Associate Administrator or the Chief Counsel determines to reconsider any regulation, a final decision on reconsideration may be issued without further proceedings, or an opportunity to submit comment or information and data as deemed appropriate, may be provided. Whenever the Associate Administrator or the Chief Counsel determines that a petition should be granted or denied, the Office of the Chief Counsel prepares a notice of the grant or denial of a petition for reconsideration, for issuance to the petitioner, and the Associate Administrator or the Chief Counsel issues it to the petitioner. The Associate Administrator or the Chief Counsel may consolidate petitions relating to the same rules.
( b ) It is the policy of the Associate Administrator or the Chief Counsel to issue notice of the action taken on a petition for reconsideration within 90 days after the date on which the regulation in question is published in the Federal Register, unless it is found impracticable to take action within that time. In cases where it is so found and the delay beyond that period is expected to be substantial, notice of that fact and the date by which it is expected that action will be taken is issued to the petitioner and published in the Federal Register.
-----Original Message----- 

From: joycedupuis@hotmail.com [mailto:joycedupuis@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:24 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Joyce Dupuis 

924 Union road 

Waldoboro, ME 04572
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 11275 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. GEORGE WHITEHEAD, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:07

- CR

- 11

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * George Whitehead, Jr. , federal prisoner # 35653

- 177, was convicted of drug and gun charges in 2007 and was sentenced to life imprisonment. He moved for resentencing under the First Step Act of 2018, § 404, Pub. L. No.
115

- 391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222 (2018). The district court denied the motion. We remand f or the limited purpose of allowing the district court to explain why it

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 8, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-11275 Document: 00515481519 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/08/2020No. 19

- 11275

2 did so, and we retain jurisdiction as is customary for limited remands. See , e.g. , United States v. Gomez , 905 F.3d 347, 354

- 56 (5th Cir. 2018)

. Without a hearing, the district court denied the motion in an order stating only that “ h aving considered the motion, the response of the government, the record, and applicable authorities,” the motion should be
denied. Though district courts need n o t always explain why they hav e denied a motion, meaningful review is possible here only with a statement of reasons for the denial. See Peteet v. Dow Chem. Co. , 868 F.2d 1428, 1436 (5th Cir. 1989)

. Absent such a statement, we can only guess why the motion was denied

. We thus REMAND for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to explain its reasons for the denial. Case: 19-11275 Document: 00515481519 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/08/2020
§ 178.508 Standards for fiber drums. ( a ) The identification code for a fiber drum is 1G.
( b ) Construction requirements for fiber drums are as follows: ( 1 ) The body of the drum must be constructed of multiple plies of heavy paper or fiberboard (without corrugations) firmly glued or laminated together and may include one or more protective layers of bitumen, waxed kraft paper, metal foil, plastic material, or similar materials.
( 2 ) Heads must be of natural wood, fiberboard, metal, plywood, plastics, or other suitable material and may include one or more protective layers of bitumen, waxed kraft paper, metal foil, plastic material, or similar material.
( 3 ) The body and heads of the drum and their joints must be of a design appropriate to the capacity and intended use of the drum.
( 4 ) The assembled packaging must be sufficiently water-resistant so as not to delaminate under normal conditions of transport.
( 5 ) Maximum capacity of drum: 450 L (119 gallons).
( 6 ) Maximum net mass: 400 kg (882 pounds).
[Amdt. 178-97, 55 FR 52717, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended by Amdt. 178-106, 59 FR 67521, Dec. 29, 1994]
Editorial Note on Part 190
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 190 appear at 78 FR 58908, Sept. 25, 2013.

§ 190.339 Direct final rulemaking. ( a ) Where practicable, the Administrator will use direct final rulemaking to issue the following types of rules: ( 1 ) Minor, substantive changes to regulations;
( 2 ) Incorporation by reference of the latest edition of technical or industry standards;
( 3 ) Extensions of compliance dates; and
( 4 ) Other noncontroversial rules where the Administrator determines that use of direct final rulemaking is in the public interest, and that a regulation is unlikely to result in adverse comment.
( b ) The direct final rule will state an effective date. The direct final rule will also state that unless an adverse comment or notice of intent to file an adverse comment is received within the specified comment period, generally 60 days after publication of the direct final rule in the Federal Register, the Administrator will issue a confirmation document, generally within 15 days after the close of the comment period, advising the public that the direct final rule will either become effective on the date stated in the direct final rule or at least 30 days after the publication date of the confirmation document, whichever is later.
( c ) For purposes of this section, an adverse comment is one which explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including a challenge to the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. Comments that are frivolous or insubstantial will not be considered adverse under this procedure. A comment recommending a rule change in addition to the rule will not be considered an adverse comment, unless the commenter states why the rule would be ineffective without the additional change.
( d ) Only parties who filed comments to a direct final rule issued under this section may petition under § 190.335 for reconsideration of that direct final rule.
( e ) If an adverse comment or notice of intent to file an adverse comment is received, a timely document will be published in the Federal Register advising the public and withdrawing the direct final rule in whole or in part. The Administrator may then incorporate the adverse comment into a subsequent direct final rule or may publish a notice of proposed rulemaking. A notice of proposed rulemaking will provide an opportunity for public comment, generally a minimum of 60 days, and will be processed in accordance with §§ 190.311-190.329.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, July 28, 1995 (104), Para 104.29 Time Limitation of Referred Bill]
[Page 1221]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.104.29  time limitation of referred bill

  Pursuant to clause 5 of rule X the following action was taken by the 
Speaker:

       H.R. 714. Referral to the Committees on National Security 
     and Commerce extended for a period ending not later than 
     August 4, 1995.
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 195

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.591 In-Line inspection of pipelines.

When conducting in-line inspection of pipelines required by this part, each operator must comply with the requirements and recommendations of API Std 1163, *Inline Inspection Systems Qualification Standard;* ANSI/ASNT ILI-PQ, *Inline Inspection Personnel Qualification and Certification;* and NACE SP0102-2010, *Inline Inspection of Pipelines* (incorporated by reference, see § 195.3). An in-line inspection may also be conducted using tethered or remote control tools provided they generally comply with those sections of NACE SP0102-2010 that are applicable.

[Amdt. 195-101, 82 FR 8000, Jan. 23, 2017]
#### William E. Pease, Respondent, *v.*Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Appellant.

Reported below, 137 App. Div. 458, 939.

(Argued September 26, 1910;

decided October 4, 1910.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 23, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.

Also motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of said Appellate Division, entered March 23, 1910, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence.

The first motion was made upon the ground that the judgment of the Appellate Division was unanimous and, therefore, not appealable to the Court of Appeals. The second upon the ground that the order of the Appellate Division was not appealable to the Court of Appeals.

*George D. Forsyth*for motion.

*Ernest G. ~\Yhitbecle*opposed.

Motion to dismiss appeal from judgment denied, with ten dollars costs.

Motion to dismiss appeal from order granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending June 2, 2012

----

Personnel            Management Division -- appointment of David J. Capp as deputy director and Donald Spicer as senior adviser, effective June 11, 2012.            -Approved, June 1, 2012            Enforcement            Battle Creek State Company, Inc., Battle Creek, Nebraska, and Battle Creek State Bank -- written agreement dated August 9, 2010, terminated May 24, 2012.            -Announced, May 31, 2012                        Castle Rock Bank, Castle Rock, Colorado -- written agreement dated May 25, 2010, terminated May 24, 2012.            -Announced, May 31, 2012                        Pacific Capital Bancorp, Santa Barbara, California -- written agreement dated May 11, 2010, terminated May 23, 2012.            -Announced, May 29, 2012                        Premier Bank, Denver, Colorado -- issuance of a prompt corrective action directive with the consent of the bank.            -Announced, May 29, 2012            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received: