CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Feather River Air Quality Management District

Rule No(s): 3.19 Date adopted/ Amended/Rescinded: Amended August 1, 2011

Rule Title(s): Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations

Date Submitted to ARB: April 18, 2013

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): Adopted August 6, 1998

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Timothy Mitro Phone Number: ( 530) 634-7659 ext 208 E-mail Address: tmitro@fraqmd.org

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Adopted Rule 3.19, Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations was included in the 1991 attainment plan

for the Northern Sacramento Valley Air Basin and again included in the revised 1994 and 1997 attainment plans

in Table VI-1, "List of Feasible M easures for Stationary Sources" as a reactive organic gas (ROG) control

measure.

This rule focuses on limiting the ROG/VOC content of various coating categories requiring the use of spray

application equipment with a transfer efficiency of at least 65 percent, requiring an enclosed gun cleaner or a low

emissions spray gun cleaner for spray equipment cleaning, and requiring that the coati ng of an entire vehicle be

performed in a spray booth.

The rule was amended on August 1, 2011 to lower the VO C limits of solvents used in surface preparation and

clean-up solvents. The VOC reductions from these 2011 rule amendments are addressed in Rule 3.14.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, w ill result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach referenc e(s) for emission factor(s)

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showi ng how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: none

Inventory Year Used to Calculate C hanges in Emissions: 1994 Area Affected: Yuba and Sutter Counties

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

In the 1998 staff report, FRAQMD showed 2 permitted facilities, each averaging 1. 5 tons/yr of VOC emissions. FRAQMD

expected 16 more shops would require a permit. Implementation of the rule was estimated to reduce emissions by 25%.

Hence, the immediate emissions savings would consist of 18 shops * 1.5 tons /shop-yr * 25% reduction = 6.75 tons of

VOC/yr. Furthermore, this rule r equires new shops in the area to be subject to the emission standards.CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 T PY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 40

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 5%

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) C of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achi eving Emission Reductions are: N/A

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): C Wo rk Practice Standards in Section(s): C

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): F Reporting Requirements in Section(s): FCALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: The rule has no effect on the recent plan updates.