JOURNAL OF THE

762

T69.14 MAY 18

Goss

Graham

Green

Greenwood

Gutierrez

Gutknecht

Hancock

Hansen

Hastert

Hastings (FL)

Hastings (WA)

Hayworth

Hefley

Heineman

Herger

Hilleary

Hilliard

Hinchey

Hobson

Hoekstra

Holden

Hostettler

Houghton

Hunter

Hutchinson

Hyde

Inglis

Istook

Johnson (SD)

Johnson, E. B.

Johnson, Sam

Johnston

Jones

Kanjorski

Kasich

Kelly

Kennedy (RI)

Kildee

Kim

King

Kingston

Klink

Knollenberg

Kolbe

LaHood

Lantos

Largent

Latham

LaTourette

Lazio

Leach

Levin

Lewis (CA)

Lewis (GA)

Lewis (KY)

Lightfoot

Linder

Livingston

LoBiondo

Lofgren

Longley

Lowey

Lucas

Maloney

Manton

Manzullo

Markey

Martinez

Martini

Mascara

Matsui

McCollum

McCrery

McDade

McDermott

McHugh

McInnis

McKeon

McKinney

Menendez

Metcalf

Meyers

Mfume

Mica

Miller (CA)

Miller (FL)

Mineta

Mink

Moakley

Molinari

Mollohan

Moorhead

Myers

Myrick

Nadler

Neal

Nethercutt

Neumann

Ney

Norwood

Nussle

Obey

Owens

Oxley

Packard

Parker

Pastor

Paxon

Payne (NJ)

Pelosi

Petri

Pickett

Pombo

Porter

Portman

Pryce

Quillen

Radanovich

Rahall

Ramstad

Reed

Regula

Reynolds

Riggs

Rivers

Roberts

Rogers

Rohrabacher

Ros-Lehtinen

Roth

Roybal-Allard

Royce

Rush

Salmon

Sanders

Sanford

Saxton

Scarborough

Schaefer

Schiff

Schumer

Seastrand

Sensenbrenner

Shadegg

Shaw

Shays

Shuster

Skeen

Skelton

Smith (NJ)

Smith (TX)

Smith (WA)

Solomon

Souder

Spence

Stearns

Stockman

Stokes

Studds

Stump

Stupak

Talent

Tate

Taylor (NC)

Tejeda

Thomas

Thompson

Thornberry

Thurman

Tiahrt

Torkildsen

Torres

Towns

Traficant

Tucker

Velazquez

Vucanovich

Waldholtz

Walker

Walsh

Wamp

Ward

Waters

Watts (OK)

Waxman

Weldon (FL)

Weldon (PA)

Weller

White

Whitfield

Wicker

Williams

Wilson

Wise

Wolf

Woolsey

Wyden

Yates

Young (AK)

Young (FL)

Zeliff

Zimmer

ANSWERED ‘‘PRESENT’’—1

Kaptur

NOT VOTING—9

Berman

Bono

Hoke

Kleczka

McIntosh

Rangel

Serrano

Smith (MI)

Torricelli

So the amendment in the nature of a

subsitute was not agreed to.

After some further time,

T69.14 RECORDED VOTE

A recorded vote by electronic device

was ordered in the Committee of the

Whole on the following amendment in

the nature of a substitute submitted by

Mr. NEUMANN:

Strike out all after the resolving clause

and insert in lieu thereof the following:

SECTION 1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE

BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996.

The Congress determines and declares that

this resolution is the concurrent resolution

on the budget for fiscal year 1996, including

the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal

years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002, as

required by section 301 of the Congressional

Budget Act of 1974.

SEC. 2. RECOMMENDED LEVELS AND AMOUNTS.

The following budgetary levels are appropriate for the fiscal years beginning on October 1, 1995, October 1, 1996, October 1, 1997,

October 1, 1998, October 1, 1999, October 1,

2000, and October 1, 2001:

(1) The recommended levels of Federal revenues are as follows:

Fiscal year 1996: $1,056,600,000,000.

Fiscal year 1997: $1,057,400,000,000.

Fiscal year 1998: $1,096,300,000,000.

Fiscal year 1999: $1,138,900,000,000.

Fiscal year 2000: $1,187,200,000,000.

Fiscal year 2001: $1,240,700,000,000.

Fiscal year 2002: $1,300,500,000,000.

and the amounts by which the aggregate levels of Federal revenues should be increased

are as follows:

Fiscal year 1996: $13,600,000,000.

Fiscal year 1997: ¥$26,600,000,000.

Fiscal year 1998: ¥$38,700,000,000.

Fiscal year 1999: ¥$48,100,000,000.

Fiscal year 2000: ¥$57,800,000,000.

Fiscal year 2001: ¥$70,300,000,000.

Fiscal year 2002: ¥$80,500,000,000.

and the amounts for Federal Insurance Contributions Act revenues for hospital insurance within the recommended levels of Federal revenues are as follows:

Fiscal year 1996: $101,900,000,000.

Fiscal year 1997: $105,900,000,000.

Fiscal year 1998: $110,500,000,000.

Fiscal year 1999: $115,600,000,000.

Fiscal year 2000: $120,700,000,000.

Fiscal year 2001: $125,900,000,000.

Fiscal year 2002: $130,900,000,000.

(2) The appropriate levels of total new

budget authority are as follows:

Fiscal year 1996: $1,219,700,000,000.

Fiscal year 1997: $1,236,000,000,000.

Fiscal year 1998: $1,251,900,000,000.

Fiscal year 1999: $1,253,800,000,000.

Fiscal year 2000: $1,275,300,000,000.

Fiscal year 2001: $1,312,600,000,000.

Fiscal year 2002: $1,359,600,000,000.

(3) The appropriate levels of total budget

outlays are as follows:

Fiscal year 1996: $1,238,700,000,000.

Fiscal year 1997: $1,245,700,000,000.

Fiscal year 1998: $1,251,200,000,000.

Fiscal year 1999: $1,233,400,000,000.

Fiscal year 2000: $1,260,700,000,000.

Fiscal year 2001: $1,302,800,000,000.

Fiscal year 2002: $1,352,400,000,000.

(4) The amounts of the deficits are as follows:

Fiscal year 1996: $182,100,000,000.

Fiscal year 1997: $188,300,000,000.

Fiscal year 1998: $154,900,000,000.

Fiscal year 1999: $94,500,000,000.

Fiscal year 2000: $73,500,000,000.

Fiscal year 2001: $62,100,000,000.

Fiscal year 2002: $51,900,000,000.

(5) The appropriate levels of the public

debt are as follows:

Fiscal year 1996: $5,214,000,000,000.

Fiscal year 1997: $5,470,000,000,000.

Fiscal year 1998: $5,697,000,000,000.

Fiscal year 1999: $5,896,000,000,000.

Fiscal year 2000: $6,081,000,000,000.

Fiscal year 2001: $6,157,000,000,000.

Fiscal year 2002: $6,216,000,000,000.

(6) The appropriate levels of total Federal

credit activity for the fiscal years beginning

on October 1, 1995, October 1, 1996, October 1,

1997, October 1, 1998, October 1, 1999, October

1, 2000, and October 1, 2001 are as follows:

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New direct loan obligations,

$18,200,000,000.

(B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $170,600,000,000.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New direct loan obligations,

$17,200,000,000.

(B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $167,800,000,000.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New direct loan obligations,

$16,200,000,000.

(B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $165,000,000,000.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New direct loan obligations,

$15,200,000,000.

(B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $162,200,000,000.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New direct loan obligations,

$14,200,000,000.

(B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $159,400,000,000.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New direct loan obligations,

$14,200,000,000.

(B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $159,400,000,000.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New direct loan obligations,

$14,200,000,000.

(B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $159,400,000.000.

SEC. 3. MAJOR FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES.

The Congress determines and declares that

the appropriate levels of new budget authority, budget outlays, new direct loan obligations, new primary loan guarantee commitments, and new secondary loan guarantee

commitments for fiscal years 1996 through

2002 for each major functional category are:

(1) National Defense (050):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, $261,200,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $260,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, $260,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $260,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, $260,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $260,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, $260,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $260,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, $260,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $260,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, $265,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $263,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, $270,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $270,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

763

1995 T69.14

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(2) International Affairs (150):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, $10,900,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $13,400,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$4,800,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $15,200,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, $9,400,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $14,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$3,800,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $12,400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, $8,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $11,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$2,800,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $9,600,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, $6,800,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $8,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$1,800,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $6,800,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, $8,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $8,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$800,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $4,000,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, $8,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $8,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$800,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $4,000,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, $8,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $8,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$800,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $4,000,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(3) General Science, Space, and Technology

(250):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, $14,100,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $15,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, $14,100,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $14,400,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, $14,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, $14,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, $14,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, $14,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, $14,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(4) Energy (270):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, $3,900,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $3,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, $3,200,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $2,200,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, $2,600,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $1,900,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, $2,300,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $1,300,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, $1,900,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $1,300,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, $2,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $2,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, $2,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $2,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(5) Natural Resources and Environment

(300):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, $18,600,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $20,700,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $20,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, $17,600,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $19,300,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $20,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, $17,600,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $17,900,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $20,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, $17,600,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $16,300,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $20,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, $17,200,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $16,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $20,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, $17,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $16,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $20,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, $17,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $16,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $20,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(6) Agriculture (350):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, $12,800,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $11,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$11,500,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $2,700,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, $11,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $10,400,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$11,500,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $2,700,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, $9,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $9,200,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$11,500,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $2,700,000,000.
JOURNAL OF THE

764

T69.14 MAY 18

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, $8,200,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $7,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$11,500,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $2,700,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, $7,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $7,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$11,500,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $2,700,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, $8,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $8,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$11,500,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $2,700,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, $8,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $8,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$11,500,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $2,700,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, $2,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$7,600,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $97,500,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $110,000,000,000.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, $900,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$6,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $97,500,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $80,000,000,000.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, ¥$1,400,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$9,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $97,500,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $50,000,000,000.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, $¥2,100,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$9,400,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $97,500,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $25,000,000,000.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, ¥$3,700,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$9,700,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $97,500,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, ¥$3,700,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$9,700,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $97,500,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, ¥$3,700,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$9,700,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $97,500,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(8) Transportation (400):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, $29,600,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $36,100,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$200,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, $32,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $33,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$200,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, $31,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $32,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$200,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, $31,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $27,800,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$200,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, $30,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $29,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$200,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, $31,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $31,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$200,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, $32,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $32,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$200,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(9) Community and Regional Development

(450):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, $6,600,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $10,200,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, $6,600,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $8,100,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, $6,400,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $6,900,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, $6,400,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $6,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, $6,200,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $6,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, $7,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $7,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, $7,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $7,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(10) Education, Training, Employment, and

Social Services (500):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, $43,300,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $51,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $27,400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, $40,600,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $42,300,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $27,400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, $40,800,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $40,400,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $27,400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, $41,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $39,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $27,400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, $41,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $40,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $27,400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, $42,100,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $42,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $27,400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

765

1995 T69.14

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, $44,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $44,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $27,400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(11) Health (550):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, $118,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $116,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, $120,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $119,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, $123,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $122,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, $127,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $124,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, $131,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $130,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, $133,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $133,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, $136,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $136,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(12) Medicare (570):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, $171,700,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $170,100,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, $181,400,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $179,600,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, $191,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $189,700,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, $202,200,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $200,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, $213,600,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $210,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, $223,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $223,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, $236,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $236,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(13) Income Security (600):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, $205,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $214,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $20,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, $208,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $216,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $20,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, $214,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $218,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $20,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, $220,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $220,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $20,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, $229,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $229,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $20,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, $233,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $233,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $20,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, $237,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $237,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $20,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(14) Social Security (650):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, $5,400,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $5,400,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, $6,200,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $6,200,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, $5,600,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $5,600,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, $5,300,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $5,300,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, $4,900,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $4,900,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, $4,700,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $4,700,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, $4,900,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $4,900,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(15) Veterans Benefits and Services (700):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, $36,300,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $35,800,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$1,700,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $27,400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, $37,200,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $37,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$1,700,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $27,400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, $37,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $37,400,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$1,700,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $27,400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, $38,000,000,000.
JOURNAL OF THE

766

T69.14 MAY 18

(B) Outlays, $38,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$1,700,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $27,400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, $40,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $40,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$1,700,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $27,400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, $41,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $41,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$1,700,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $27,400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, $43,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $43,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations,

$1,700,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $27,400,000,000.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(16) Administration of Justice (750):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, $16,200,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $16,100,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, $16,100,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, $16,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, $16,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $15,700,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, $16,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $15,600,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, $16,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $16,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, $16,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $16,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(17) General Government (800):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, $12,800,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $13,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, $12,600,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $12,400,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, $12,400,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $12,400,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, $12,400,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $12,300,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, $12,400,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $12,200,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, $12,400,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $12,200,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, $12,400,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $12,200,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(18) Net Interest (900):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, $297,100,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $297,100,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, $305,600,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $305,600,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, $309,800,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $309,800,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, $315,800,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $315,800,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, $321,200,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $321,200,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, $326,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $326,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, $332,000,000,000.

(B) Outlays, $332,000,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(19) Allowances (920):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, ¥$14,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$12,300,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, ¥$15,100,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$13,100,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, ¥$15,400,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$13,400,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, ¥$33,900,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$32,900,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, ¥$38,500,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$38,500,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, ¥$32,800,000,000.

(B) Outlays,

(C) New direct loan obligations,

¥$32,800,000,000.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, ¥$20,800,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$20,800,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(20) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):

Fiscal year 1996:

(A) New budget authority, ¥$31,300,000,000.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

767

1995 T69.14

(B) Outlays, ¥$31,300,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1997:

(A) New budget authority, ¥$31,200,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$31,200,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1998:

(A) New budget authority, ¥$31,900,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$31,900,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 1999:

(A) New budget authority, ¥$35,800,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$35,800,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2000:

(A) New budget authority, ¥$36,800,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$36,800,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2001:

(A) New budget authority, ¥$35,600,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$35,600,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

Fiscal year 2002:

(A) New budget authority, ¥$37,700,000,000.

(B) Outlays, ¥$37,700,000,000.

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

(E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

SEC. 4. RECONCILIATION.

(a) Not later than July 14, 1995, the House

committees named in subsections (b)

through (o) of this section shall submit their

recommendations to the House Budget Committee. After receiving those recommendations, the House Budget Committee shall report to the House a reconciliation bill or resolution or both carrying out all such recommendations without any substantive revision.

(b) The House Committee on Agriculture

shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays

as follows: $6,200,000,000 in budget authority

and $6,200,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year

1996, $11,500,000,000 in budget authority and

$11,500,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997,

$14,400,000,000 in budget authority and

$14,400,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1998,

$17,100,000,000 in budget authority and

$17,100,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999,

$19,400,000,000 in budget authority and

$19,400,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000,

$21,100,000,000 in budget authority and

$21,100,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001,

and $23,600,000,000 in budget authority and

$23,600,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.

(c) The House Committee on Banking and

Financial Services shall report changes in

laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as follows: $800,000,000 in

budget authority and $800,000,000 in outlays

in fiscal year 1996, $800,000,000 in budget authority and $800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal

year 1997, $800,000,000 in budget authority and

$800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1998,

$800,000,000 in budget authority and

$800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999,

$800,000,000 in budget authority and

$800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000,

$800,000,000 in budget authority and

$800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, and

$800,000,000 in budget authority and

$800,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.

(d) The House Committee on Commerce

shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays

as follows: $19,900,000,000 in budget authority

and $19,300,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year

1996, $36,800,000,000 in budget authority and

$37,200,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997,

$55,900,000,000 in budget authority and

$56,100,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1998,

$80,300,000,000 in budget authority and

$79,700,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999,

$100,600,000,000 in budget authority and

$100,800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000,

$124,900,000,000 in budget authority and

$124,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001,

and $148,400,000,000 in budget authority and

$148,400,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.

(e) The House Committee on Economic and

Educational Opportunities shall report

changes in laws within its jurisdiction that

provide direct spending sufficient to reduce

budget authority and outlays as follows:

$1,600,000,000 in budget authority and

$1,600,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996,

$2,500,000,000 in budget authority and

$2,500,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997,

$2,600,000,000 in budget authority and

$2,600,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1998,

$2,800,000,000 in budget authority and

$2,800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999,

$2,900,000,000 in budget authority and

$2,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000,

$3,100,000,000 in budget authority and

$3,100,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001,

and $3,300,000,000 in budget authority and

$3,300,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.

(f) The House Committee on Government

Reform and Oversight shall report changes

in laws within its jurisdiction that provide

direct spending sufficient to reduce budget

authority and outlays as follows:

$1,800,000,000 in budget authority and

$1,800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996,

$2,600,000,000 in budget authority and

$2,600,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997,

$2,900,000,000 in budget authority and

$2,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1998,

$2,900,000,000 in budget authority and

$2,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999,

$2,900,000,000 in budget authority and

$2,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000,

$2,900,000,000 in budget authority and

$2,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001,

and $2,900,000,000 in budget authority and

$2,900,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.

(g) The House Committee on International

Relations shall report changes in laws within

its jurisdiction that provide direct spending

sufficient to reduce budget authority and

outlays as follows: $0 in budget authority

and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1996, $0 in

budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal

year 1997, $0 in budget authority and $0 in

outlays in fiscal year 1998, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1999,

$0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in

fiscal year 2000, $0 in budget authority and $0

in outlays in fiscal year 2001, and $0 in budget authority and $0 in fiscal year 2002.

(h) The House Committee on the Judiciary

shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays

as follows: $1,000,000,000 in budget authority

and $750,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996,

$1,000,000,000 in budget authority and

$800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997,

$1,000,000,000 in budget authority and

$900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1998,

$1,000,000,000 in budget authority and

$1,000,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999,

$1,000,000,000 in budget authority and

$1,000,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000,

$1,000,000,000 in budget authority and

$1,000,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001,

and $1,000,000,000 in budget authority and

$1,000,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.

(i) The House Committee on National Security shall report changes in laws within its

jurisdiction that provide direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as follows: $0 in budget authority and $0

in outlays in fiscal year 1996, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1997,

$0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in

fiscal year 1998, $0 in budget authority and $0

in outlays in fiscal year 1999, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 2000,

$0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in

fiscal year 2001, and $0 in budget authority

and $0 in fiscal year 2002.

(j) The House Committee on Resources

shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays

as follows: $4,200,000,000 in budget authority

and $4,100,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year

1996, $5,800,000,000 in budget authority and

$5,800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997,

$5,000,000,000 in budget authority and

$5,000,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1998,

$3,900,000,000 in budget authority and

$3,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999,

$4,000,000,000 in budget authority and

$4,000,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000,

$3,400,000,000 in budget authority and

$3,400,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001,

and $3,400,000,000 in budget authority and

$3,400,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.

(k) The House Committee on Science shall

report changes in laws within its jurisdiction

that provide direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as follows: $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays

in fiscal year 1996, $0 in budget authority and

$0 in outlays in fiscal year 1997, $0 in budget

authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year

1998, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays

in fiscal year 1999, $0 in budget authority and

$0 in outlays in fiscal year 2000, $0 in budget

authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year

2001, and $0 in budget authority and $0 in fiscal year 2002.

(l) The House Committee on Small Business shall report changes in laws within its

jurisdiction that provide direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as follows: $0 in budget authority and $0

in outlays in fiscal year 1996, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1997,

$0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in

fiscal year 1998, $0 in budget authority and $0

in outlays in fiscal year 1999, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 2000,

$0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in

fiscal year 2001, and $0 in budget authority

and $0 in fiscal year 2002.

(m) The House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure shall report

changes in laws within its jurisdiction that

provide direct spending sufficient to reduce

budget authority and outlays as follows:

$5,000,000,000 in budget authority and $0 in

outlays in fiscal year 1996, $8,200,000,000 in

budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal

year 1997, $8,500,000,000 in budget authority

and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1998,

$8,800,000,000 in budget authority and $0 in

outlays in fiscal year 1999, $9,100,000,000 in

budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal

year 2000, $9,400,000,000 in budget authority

and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, and

$9,800,000,000 in budget authority and $0 in

fiscal year 2002.
JOURNAL OF THE

768

T69.15 MAY 18

(n) The House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs shall report changes in laws within its

jurisdiction that provide direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as follows: $1,100,000,000 in budget authority and $1,000,000,000 in outlays in fiscal

year 1996, $1,200,000,000 in budget authority

and $1,200,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year

1997, $1,300,000,000 in budget authority and

$1,300,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1998,

$1,900,000,000 in budget authority and

$1,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999,

$2,100,000,000 in budget authority and

$2,200,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000,

$2,100,000,000 in budget authority and

$2,300,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001,

and $2,400,000,000 in budget authority and

$2,600,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.

(o) The House Committee on Ways and

Means shall report changes in laws within its

jurisdiction sufficient to reduce the deficit,

as follows: $45,300,000,000 in fiscal year 1996,

$32,000,000,000 in fiscal year 1997,

$39,300,000,000 in fiscal year 1998,

$52,000,000,000 in fiscal year 1999,

$66,700,000,000 in fiscal year 2000,

$82,100,000,000 in fiscal year 2001, and

$97,400,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.

(p) For purposes of this section, the term

‘‘direct spending’’ has the meaning given to

such term in section 250(c)(8) of the Balanced

Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act

of 1985 and the term ‘‘new budget authority’’

has the meaning given to such term in section 3(2) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974.

SEC. 5. SENSE OF THE HOUSE REGARDING SOCIAL SECURITY.

It is the sense of the House of Representatives that legislation should be enacted that:

(1) Prohibits the use of the surplus funds

collected as part of the social security payroll tax from being used to balance the budget or reduce the deficit.

(2) Starting in 1996, sets aside these surplus

funds to preserve and protect the social security system.

(3) Establishes a bipartisan commission to

oversee the protection of these surplus funds,

the primary purpose of which is to establish

a safe and secure mechanism to preserve

these funds.

(4) Provides that as the Federal debt is repaid, the social security funds that are currently part of the $4,900,000,000,000 Federal

debt as well as interest on these funds shall

also be repaid and set aside under the mechanism established under paragraphs (2) and

(3).

SEC. 6. SENSE OF THE HOUSE REGARDING DEBT

REPAYMENT.

It is the sense of the House of Representatives that:

(1) The Congress has a basic moral and ethical responsibility to future generations to

repay the Federal debt. The Congress should

enact a plan that not only balances the

budget but also institutes a regimen for paying off the Federal debt.

(2) After the budget is balanced, spending

should be allowed to grow at a rate slower

than expected revenues so that a surplus is

created which can be used to begin paying off

the debt.

(3) Such a plan should be enacted into law

so that this generation can save our children

and grandchildren from the crushing burdens

of the Federal debt.

It was decided in the Yeas ....... 89 ! negative ....................... Nays ...... 342

T69.15 [Roll No. 343]

AYES—89

Allard

Baker (CA)

Bartlett

Barton

Brownback

Bryant (TN)

Burr

Burton

Chabot

Chenoweth

Christensen

Chrysler

Coburn

Combest

Condit

Cooley

Cox

Crane

Crapo

Cubin

Diaz-Balart

Doolittle

Dreier

Duncan

Ehlers

Ensign

Fawell

Foley

Forbes

Ford

Fox

Frisa

Funderburk

Geren

Gilchrest

Goodlatte

Goss

Graham

Gutknecht

Hancock

Hansen

Hayworth

Hilleary

Hoekstra

Hostettler

Istook

Johnson, Sam

Jones

Kingston

Klug

Largent

Manzullo

McInnis

McIntosh

Metcalf

Mica

Moorhead

Myers

Neumann

Norwood

Petri

Pombo

Quillen

Rohrabacher

Ros-Lehtinen

Roth

Royce

Salmon

Sanford

Scarborough

Schaefer

Seastrand

Sensenbrenner

Smith (MI)

Smith (WA)

Solomon

Souder

Stockman

Tauzin

Taylor (MS)

Thornberry

Tiahrt

Torkildsen

Upton

Waldholtz

Wamp

White

Zeliff

Zimmer

NOES—342

Abercrombie

Ackerman

Andrews

Archer

Armey

Bachus

Baesler

Baker (LA)

Baldacci

Ballenger

Barcia

Barr

Barrett (NE)

Barrett (WI)

Bass

Bateman

Becerra

Beilenson

Bentsen

Bereuter

Bevill

Bilbray

Bilirakis

Bishop

Bliley

Blute

Boehlert

Boehner

Bonilla

Bonior

Borski

Boucher

Brewster

Browder

Brown (CA)

Brown (FL)

Brown (OH)

Bryant (TX)

Bunn

Bunning

Buyer

Callahan

Calvert

Camp

Canady

Cardin

Castle

Chambliss

Chapman

Clay

Clayton

Clement

Clinger

Clyburn

Coble

Coleman

Collins (GA)

Collins (IL)

Collins (MI)

Conyers

Costello

Coyne

Cramer

Cremeans

Cunningham

Danner

Davis

de la Garza

Deal

DeFazio

DeLauro

DeLay

Dellums

Deutsch

Dickey

Dicks

Dingell

Dixon

Doggett

Dooley

Dornan

Doyle

Dunn

Durbin

Edwards

Ehrlich

Emerson

Engel

English

Eshoo

Evans

Everett

Ewing

Farr

Fattah

Fazio

Fields (LA)

Fields (TX)

Filner

Flake

Flanagan

Foglietta

Fowler

Frank (MA)

Franks (CT)

Franks (NJ)

Frelinghuysen

Frost

Furse

Gallegly

Ganske

Gejdenson

Gekas

Gephardt

Gibbons

Gillmor

Gilman

Gonzalez

Goodling

Gordon

Green

Greenwood

Gunderson

Gutierrez

Hall (OH)

Hall (TX)

Hamilton

Harman

Hastert

Hastings (FL)

Hastings (WA)

Hayes

Hefley

Hefner

Heineman

Herger

Hilliard

Hinchey

Hobson

Hoke

Holden

Horn

Houghton

Hoyer

Hunter

Hutchinson

Hyde

Inglis

Jackson-Lee

Jacobs

Jefferson

Johnson (CT)

Johnson (SD)

Johnson, E. B.

Johnston

Kanjorski

Kaptur

Kasich

Kelly

Kennedy (MA)

Kennedy (RI)

Kennelly

Kildee

Kim

King

Klink

Knollenberg

Kolbe

LaFalce

LaHood

Lantos

Latham

LaTourette

Laughlin

Lazio

Leach

Levin

Lewis (CA)

Lewis (GA)

Lewis (KY)

Lightfoot

Lincoln

Linder

Lipinski

Livingston

LoBiondo

Lofgren

Longley

Lowey

Lucas

Luther

Maloney

Manton

Markey

Martinez

Martini

Mascara

Matsui

McCarthy

McCollum

McCrery

McDade

McDermott

McHale

McHugh

McKeon

McKinney

McNulty

Meehan

Meek

Menendez

Meyers

Mfume

Miller (CA)

Miller (FL)

Mineta

Minge

Mink

Moakley

Molinari

Mollohan

Montgomery

Moran

Morella

Murtha

Myrick

Nadler

Neal

Nethercutt

Ney

Nussle

Oberstar

Obey

Olver

Ortiz

Orton

Owens

Oxley

Packard

Pallone

Parker

Pastor

Paxon

Payne (NJ)

Payne (VA)

Pelosi

Peterson (FL)

Peterson (MN)

Pickett

Pomeroy

Porter

Portman

Poshard

Pryce

Quinn

Radanovich

Rahall

Ramstad

Rangel

Reed

Regula

Reynolds

Richardson

Riggs

Rivers

Roberts

Roemer

Rogers

Rose

Roukema

Roybal-Allard

Rush

Sabo

Sanders

Sawyer

Saxton

Schiff

Schroeder

Schumer

Scott

Serrano

Shadegg

Shaw

Shays

Shuster

Sisisky

Skaggs

Skeen

Skelton

Slaughter

Smith (NJ)

Smith (TX)

Spence

Spratt

Stark

Stearns

Stenholm

Stokes

Studds

Stump

Stupak

Talent

Tanner

Tate

Taylor (NC)

Tejeda

Thomas

Thompson

Thornton

Thurman

Torres

Torricelli

Towns

Traficant

Tucker

Velazquez

Vento

Visclosky

Volkmer

Vucanovich

Walker

Walsh

Ward

Waters

Watt (NC)

Watts (OK)

Waxman

Weldon (FL)

Weldon (PA)

Weller

Whitfield

Wicker

Williams

Wilson

Wise

Wolf

Woolsey

Wyden

Wynn

Yates

Young (AK)

Young (FL)

NOT VOTING—3

Berman Bono Kleczka

So the amendment in the nature of a

subsitute was not agreed to.

After some further time,

T69.16 RECORDED VOTE

A recorded vote by electronic device

was ordered in the Committee of the

Whole on the following amendment in

the nature of a substitute submitted by

Mr. PAYNE of New Jersey:

Strike all after the resolving clause and insert the following:

SECTION 1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE

BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996.

The Congress determines and declares that

this resolution is the concurrent resolution

on the budget for fiscal year 1996, including

the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal

years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002, as

required by section 301 of the Congressional

Budget Act of 1974.

SEC. 2. RECOMMENDED LEVELS AND AMOUNTS.

The following budgetary levels are appropriate for the fiscal years beginning on October 1, 1995, October 1, 1996, October 1, 1997,

October 1, 1998, October 1, 1999, October 1,

2000, and October 1, 2001:

(1) The recommended levels of Federal revenues are as follows:

Fiscal year 1996: $1,060,800,000,000.

Fiscal year 1997: $1,113,500,000,000.

Fiscal year 1998: $1,199,600,000,000.

Fiscal year 1999: $1,290,530,000,000.

Fiscal year 2000: $1,361,430,000,000.

Fiscal year 2001: $1,495,274,000,000.

Fiscal year 2002: $1,576,520,000,000.

and the amounts by which the aggregate levels of Federal revenues should be increased

are as follows:

Fiscal year 1996: $17,800,000,000.

Fiscal year 1997: $30,000,000,000.

Fiscal year 1998: $64,600,000,000.

Fiscal year 1999: $103,130,000,000.

Fiscal year 2000: $115,930,000,000.

Fiscal year 2001: $183,774,000,000.

Fiscal year 2002: $195,520,000,000.

and the amounts for Federal Insurance Contributions Act revenues for hospital insur-