alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 148 (Thursday, August 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 42378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3765]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will 
meet in Willows, California. Agenda items covered include: (1) 
Introductions, (2) Approve Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) Project 
Proposals/Action, (5) General Discussion, (6) Next Agenda.

DATES: The meeting will be held on August 13, 2007, from 1:30 p.m. and 
end at approximately 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Mendocino National Forest 
Supervisor's Office, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988. 
Individuals who wish to speak or propose agenda items send their names 
and proposals to Eduardo Olmedo, DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 
95988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bobbin Gaddini, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, P.O. Box 
164, Elk Creek, CA 95939. (530) 968-1815; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c0a7a7a1a4a4a9aea980a6b3eea6a5a4eeb5b3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4f28282e2b2b2621260f293c61292a2b613a3c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public. 
Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee 
members. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of 
the Committee will file written statements with the Committee staff 
before or after the meeting. Public input sessions are provided and 
individuals who made written requests by August 10, 2007 have the 
opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

    Dated: July 25, 2007.
Eduardo Olmedo,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 07-3765 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
C-1 

APPENDIX C – POSTUTIL SCREENING CONFIGURATION

The tables below identify the recommended POSTUTIL processor screening configurations 

for CENRAP BART modeling. 

Table C-1. Input Groups in the POSTUTIL Processor Control File. 

Sub 

Group Description 

Applicable to 

CENRAP BART 

0a Input and output file names Yes 

1 NMET – Number of CALMET data files (365) Yes 

2 NFILES – Number of CALPUFF data files Yes 

Table C-2. POSTUTIL Processor Input Group 1: General Run Control Parameters. 

 

Parameter DEFAULT CENRAP Comments 

ISYR -- 2001 Starting year 

ISMO -- 1 Starting month 

ISDY -- 1 Starting day 

ISHR -- 0 Starting hour 

NPER -- 8760 Number of periods to process 

NSPECINP -- 6 Number of CALPUFF species to process 

NSPECOUT -- 6 Number of species to output 

NSPECCMP -- 0 Number of species to derive 

MDUPLCT -- 1 Stop run if duplicate name 

NSCALED -- 0 Number of CALPUFF files to ‘scale’ 

MNITRATE -- 1 Recompute the HNO3/NO3 partition for 

CALPUFF modeled concentrations? 1 = yes 

for all sources combined 

BCKNH3 10. 3. Default NH3 concentration (ppb) for 

HNO3/NO3 partitioning 
 

C-2 

Table C-3. POSTUTIL Processor Input Group 2: Species Processing Information. 

 

Parameter DEFAULT CENRAP Comments 

ASPECI -- SO2, SO4, NOx, HNO3, 

NO3, PM10

Species to post-process 

ASPECO -- SO2, SO4, NOx, HNO3, 

NO3, PM10

Species to output 

CSPECCMP -- CSPECCMP = N 

SO2 = 0.0 

SO4 = 0.291667 

NO = 0.466667 

NO2 = 0.304348 

HNO3 = 0.222222 

NO3 = 0.451613 

PM10 = 0.0 

Nitrogen species to be 

computed by scaling and 

summing one or more of the 

processed input species using 

the scaling factors for each 

of the NSPECINP input 

species

CSPECCMP -- CSPECCMP = S 

SO2 = 0.50 

SO4 = 0.333333 

NO = 0.0 

NO2 = 0.0 

HNO3 = 0.0 

NO3 = 0.0 

PM10 = 0.0 

Sulfur species to be 

computed by scaling and 

summing one or more of the 

processed input species using 

the scaling factors for each 

of the NSPECINP input 

species

MODDAT -- A (Default=1.0) 

SO2 = 1.1 

SO4 = 1.5 

HNO3 = 0.8 

NO3 = 0.1 

B (Default=0.0) 

SO2 = 0.0 

SO4 = 0.0 

HNO3 = 0.0 

NO3 = 0.0 

Each species in NSCALED 

CALPUFF data files may be 

scaled before processing 

(e.g., to change the emission 

rate for all sources modeled 

in the run that produced a 

data file). For each scaled 

species the scaling factors 

are A and B where x' = Ax + 

B.
Robin A Carroll, sUAS Make & Model I certify that the aircraft is in an airworthy condit

Log Page Ser # inspection has been performed IAW the operator

Date: N# Time Today A/F T.T. Eng T.T. 1 LF Eng T.T. 2 LR Eng T.T. 3 RF Eng T.T

Maintenance

Discrepancy Maintenance Performed

Close Out

Weekly
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130884 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130884 COA: 257332 Kent CC: 04-001615-FC JERRY LOUIS DAVID, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 2, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

d0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2006

Clerk
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PHI Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the  period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Henry D. Fahman, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

/s/ Henry Fahman

Henry Fahman

Acting CFO

February 22, 2010

 

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.310 Exceptions for radiation detectors. Radiation detectors, radiation sensors, electron tube devices, or ionization chambers, herein referred to as “radiation detectors,” that contain only Division 2.2 gases in non-refillable cylinders, are excepted from the specification packaging in this subchapter and, except when transported by air, from labeling and placarding requirements of this subchapter when designed, packaged, and transported as follows: ( a ) Radiation detectors must be single-trip, hermetically sealed, welded metal inside containers that will not fragment upon impact.
( b ) Radiation detectors must not have a design pressure exceeding 5.00 MPa (725 psig) and a capacity exceeding 405 fluid ounces (731 cubic inches). They must be designed and fabricated with a burst pressure of not less than three times the design pressure if the radiation detector is equipped with a pressure relief device, and not less than four times the design pressure if the detector is not equipped with a pressure relief device.
( c ) Radiation detectors must be shipped in a strong outer packaging capable of withstanding a drop test of at least 1.2 meters (4 feet) without breakage of the radiation detector or rupture of the outer packaging. If the radiation detector is shipped as part of other equipment, the equipment must be packaged in strong outer packaging or the equipment itself must provide an equivalent level of protection.
( d ) Emergency response information accompanying each shipment and available from each emergency response telephone number for radiation detectors must identify those receptacles that are not fitted with a pressure relief device and provide appropriate guidance for exposure to fire.
( e ) Except as provided paragraph (f) of this section, transport in accordance with this section must be noted on the shipping paper.
( f ) Radiation detectors, including detectors in radiation detection systems, are not subject to any other requirements of this subchapter, including shipping papers, if the detectors meet the requirements in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section and the capacity of detector receptacles does not exceed 50 ml (1.7 oz.).
[82 FR 15891, Mar. 30, 2017]
-----Original Message----- 

From: spasbel@yahoo.com [mailto:spasbel@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:14 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sue Beltran 

500 W. Camino Encanto 

Green Valley, AZ 85614
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-4885

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY B. MITCHELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (CR-98-69)

Submitted: April 28, 2000 Decided: May 17, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry M. Dash, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F.

Fahey, United States Attorney, Damon A. King, Special Assistant

United States Attorney, Fort Monroe, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial, Anthony B. Mitchell was convicted on

one count of larceny of personal property, in violation of 18

U.S.C. §§ 2, 7 (1994) and 18 U.S.C.A. § 661 (West Supp. 1999). The

district court sentenced him to ten months in prison. Mitchell

appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support his

conviction. Evidence presented at trial showed that Mitchell and

Tremell Watson borrowed a screwdriver and Watson testified that

they then used the screwdriver to steal a Plymouth Acclaim on base

at Fort Eustis. Mitchell’s fingerprint was found on the stolen

license plate affixed to the Acclaim. Viewing the evidence in the

light most favorable to the government, we find that there was

sufficient evidence for a rational trier of fact to have found

Mitchell guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See Glasser v. United

States, 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942). Consequently, we affirm Mitchell’s

conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
-----Original Message----- 

From: cerrud@me.com [mailto:cerrud@me.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:45 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Euribiades Cerrud 

14938 Hartford Run Drive 

Orlando, FL 32828
|EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)

I, Robert H. Young, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flow of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

Dated: March 30, 2007

/s/ Robert H. Young  Chief Executive Officer
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 213.141 Self-guarded frogs. ( a ) The raised guard on a self-guarded frog shall not be worn more than three-eighths of an inch.
( b ) If repairs are made to a self-guarded frog without removing it from service, the guarding face shall be restored before rebuilding the point.
From: Bearwood4@msn.com [mailto:Bearwood4@msn.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:06 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Bette Wood 

91 Lemmon Rd 

Port Angeles, WA 98362
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:            May      13,  2008 | /s/ John      Venette                         . |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                      | John      Venette                                                                                                                                                            |   |
|                                                                                                      | Principal      Financial Officer                                                                                                                                             |   |
From: suzanne.gaynor@verizon.net [mailto:suzanne.gaynor@verizon.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:21 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Suzanne Gaynor 

540 N St, SW 

Washington, DC 20024
EXHIBIT 12.1

Central Power and Light Company
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
For Years Ended December 31,
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                         1996         1995         1994       1993(2)        1992
                                      ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
                                                      (thousands, except ratios)
<S>                                   <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Operating income                       $285,647     $282,184     $256,251     $190,079     $266,665
Adjustments:
  Income taxes                           47,227       51,755       51,329      (18,954)      34,726
  Provision for deferred
    income taxes                         51,476      (30,025)      26,659       90,520       48,610
  Deferred investment tax credits        (5,553)      (5,789)      (5,789)      (5,806)      (5,837)
  Reserve for utility plant costs,
    net of tax                          (15,569)        --           --           --           --
  Other income and deductions             3,997       14,880        1,272        1,663          890
  Allowance for borrowed and equity
    funds used during construction        1,845        4,514        3,689        2,618        1,171
  Mirror CWIP amortization                 --         41,000       68,000       75,702       82,527
                                      =========    =========    =========    =========    =========
        Earnings                       $369,070     $358,519     $401,411     $335,822     $428,752
                                      =========    =========    =========    =========    =========


Fixed charges:
  Interest on long-term debt           $110,375     $116,205     $111,408     $112,939     $125,476
  Interest on short-term debt and 
    other                                18,494       19,926       12,365       11,993        7,266
                                      =========    =========    =========    =========    =========
        Fixed charges                  $128,869     $136,131     $123,773     $124,932     $132,742
                                      =========    =========    =========    =========    =========


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges         2.86 (1)     2.63         3.24         2.69 (3)     3.23



(1)  Earnings in 1996 reflect a $15.6 million one-time charge, net of tax,
     associated with certain investments for plant sites, engineering studies
     and lignite reserves and the expiration in 1995 of Mirror CWIP liability
     amortization income.
(2)  Earnings in 1993 were significantly affected by restructuring charges, the
     $27 million cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles and prior
     year tax adjustments. CPL changed its method of accounting for unbilled
     revenues in 1993. 
(3)  The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for 1993 was
     calculated before cumulative effect of change in accounting principles.
</TABLE>
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE EPA-HQ- OW-20 10 - 0824 DCN CBM00 65 7 THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.555 Uprating to a pressure that will produce a hoop stress of 30 percent or more of SMYS in steel pipelines. ( a ) Unless the requirements of this section have been met, no person may subject any segment of a steel pipeline to an operating pressure that will produce a hoop stress of 30 percent or more of SMYS and that is above the established maximum allowable operating pressure.
( b ) Before increasing operating pressure above the previously established maximum allowable operating pressure the operator shall: ( 1 ) Review the design, operating, and maintenance history and previous testing of the segment of pipeline and determine whether the proposed increase is safe and consistent with the requirements of this part; and
( 2 ) Make any repairs, replacements, or alterations in the segment of pipeline that are necessary for safe operation at the increased pressure.
( c ) After complying with paragraph (b) of this section, an operator may increase the maximum allowable operating pressure of a segment of pipeline constructed before September 12, 1970, to the highest pressure that is permitted under § 192.619, using as test pressure the highest pressure to which the segment of pipeline was previously subjected (either in a strength test or in actual operation).
( d ) After complying with paragraph (b) of this section, an operator that does not qualify under paragraph (c) of this section may increase the previously established maximum allowable operating pressure if at least one of the following requirements is met: ( 1 ) The segment of pipeline is successfully tested in accordance with the requirements of this part for a new line of the same material in the same location.
( 2 ) An increased maximum allowable operating pressure may be established for a segment of pipeline in a Class 1 location if the line has not previously been tested, and if: ( i ) It is impractical to test it in accordance with the requirements of this part;
( ii ) The new maximum operating pressure does not exceed 80 percent of that allowed for a new line of the same design in the same location; and
( iii ) The operator determines that the new maximum allowable operating pressure is consistent with the condition of the segment of pipeline and the design requirements of this part.
( e ) Where a segment of pipeline is uprated in accordance with paragraph (c) or (d)(2) of this section, the increase in pressure must be made in increments that are equal to: ( 1 ) 10 percent of the pressure before the uprating; or
( 2 ) 25 percent of the total pressure increase,
whichever produces the fewer number of increments.
-----Original Message----- 

From: dsressler@earthlink.net [mailto:dsressler@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:39 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

 Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and physical health 

care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Diana Ressler 

69711 Willow 

Cathedral City, CA 92234