alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                       1,470,050
<SECURITIES>                                   376,281
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,194,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                    41,141
<INVENTORY>                                  1,622,588
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,681,991
<PP&E>                                       4,716,444
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,135,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,727,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,587,875
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    375,000
<COMMON>                                       144,362
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,510,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,727,737
<SALES>                                      4,947,776
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,947,776
<CGS>                                        3,226,579
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,226,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,549,867
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,681,142)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,681,142)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,681,142)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.93)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 174.105 Routing shipments, Division 1.1 or 1.2 (explosive) materials.

Before a shipment of Division 1.1 or 1.2 (explosive) materials destined to a point beyond the lines of the initial carrier is accepted from the shipper, the initial carrier shall ascertain that the shipment can go forward by the route designated. To avoid delays en route, the initial carrier must be in possession of full rate information before forwarding the shipment.

[Amdt. 174-26, 41 FR 16092, Apr. 15, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 174-68, 55 FR 52682, Dec. 21, 1990; 66 FR 45383, Aug. 28, 2001]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1780
EDWARD G. TINSLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-97- 1333-AMD) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 12, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward G. Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his suit filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tinsley v. United States , No. CA97-1333-AMD (D. Md. May 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.483 Remedial measures: General. ( a ) Each segment of metallic pipe that replaces pipe removed from a buried or submerged pipeline because of external corrosion must have a properly prepared surface and must be provided with an external protective coating that meets the requirements of § 192.461.
( b ) Each segment of metallic pipe that replaces pipe removed from a buried or submerged pipeline because of external corrosion must be cathodically protected in accordance with this subpart.
( c ) Except for cast iron or ductile iron pipe, each segment of buried or submerged pipe that is required to be repaired because of external corrosion must be cathodically protected in accordance with this subpart.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 221 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                    

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 221

  To amend title 18, United States Code, to regulate the manufacture, 
          importation, and sale of polymer plastic ammunition.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Deutsch (for himself, Mr. Lantos, Mr. Meehan, and Mr. Pallone) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, to regulate the manufacture, 
          importation, and sale of polymer plastic ammunition.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Law Enforcement Officials Protection 
Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF ARMOR PIERCING AMMUNITION EXPANDED TO INCLUDE 
              POLYMER PLASTIC AMMUNITION.

    (a) In General.--Section 921(a)(17)(B) of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (i); and
            (2) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii) and 
        inserting after clause (i) the following:
            ``(ii) a projectile or projectile core which may be used in 
        a firearm and which is constructed entirely (excluding the 
        presence of traces of other substances) from polymer plastic; 
        or''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to conduct engaged in after the 30-day period that begins with 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0638 Directorate Identifier: 2011

-NM

- 266

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed c ell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost T otal Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD h ave a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include speci fic requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES NO Explanation:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 4, 2020

a0127

Order 

Clerk

February 4, 2020

159118(69)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 159118

COA: 338601

Jackson CC: 16-004024-FC

PERCY EDWARD TAYLOR,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 

30, 2019 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 138 (Thursday, July 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39633-39634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3510]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel, Review of Specialized and 
Comprehensive Alcohol Research Centers (RFA-AA-07-002; AA-02-003).
    Date: August 2, 2007.
    Time: 1:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.

[[Page 39634]]

    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 5635 
Fishers Lane RM 3039, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Abraham P. Bautista, PhD, Chief, Extramural 
Project Branch Review, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & 
Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, RM 
3039, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-9737, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e7858692938e94938686a78a868e8bc9898e8fc9808891"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="65070410110c161104042508040c094b0b0c0d4b020a13">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 9, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-3510 Filed 7-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit No. 23.1

               Consent of Independent Auditors

                              

                              

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Norwich Financial Corp.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Nos. 33-79530, 33-39324 and 33-24866) on Forms S-8
of Norwich Financial Corp. of our report dated January 17,
1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Norwich
Financial Corp. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1996 and
1995 and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996,
which report appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report
on Form 10-K of Norwich Financial Corp.

Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting
for investment securities in 1994.


/s/KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP




Hartford, Connecticut
March 18, 1997
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER****PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)****OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Paulson Capital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Karen L. Johannes, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the bestof my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.
| /s/ Karen L. Johannes   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Karen L. Johannes       |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| Paulson Capital Corp.   |   |
| May 14, 2007            |   |

This certification ismade solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any otherpurpose.  A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Paulson CapitalCorp. and will be retained by Paulson Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

SCHEDULE II-VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
NTELOS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(In thousands)
(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                        COL. A.                              COL. B               COL. C               COL. D          COL. E
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Additions
                                                                         ------------------------
                                                                                       Charged to
                                                           Balance at    Charges to      Other
                                                          Beginning of    Costs and    Accounts -                  Balance at End
                      Description                            Period       Expenses      Describe     Deductions      of Period
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                       <C>            <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002:
Reserves and allowances deducted from asset accounts:
 Allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable         $     13,971   $   18,418(1)               $    9,219(2) $       23,170
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001:
Reserves and allowances deducted from asset accounts:
 Allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable         $      5,100   $   10,102    $    3,313(3) $    4,544(2) $       13,971
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000:
Reserves and allowances deducted from asset accounts:
 Allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable         $      1,100   $    3,238    $    2,455(3) $    1,693(2) $        5,100
</TABLE>

----------
(1)  This amount includes a $1.2 million reserve recorded for amounts
     uncollected to date from Horizon Personal Communications, Inc.. For
     additional information, see Note 18 of the financial statements of NTELOS
     Inc. included in Item 8 herein.

(2)  Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries

(3)  This amount represents the allowance added as a result of the transactions
     described in Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements included in
     financial statements of NTELOS Inc. included in Item 8 herein.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2267 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2267

 To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
  Liability Act of 1980 to prevent the construction of a gas recovery 
    treatment facility at the OII site east of downtown Los Angeles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 6, 1995

 Mr. Martinez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
  Liability Act of 1980 to prevent the construction of a gas recovery 
    treatment facility at the OII site east of downtown Los Angeles.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF FUNDS FROM SUPERFUND PROHIBITED FOR GAS RECOVERY 
              TREATMENT FACILITY AT OII SITE.

    Section 111 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 is amended by adding the 
following at the end thereof:
    ``(q) Use of Funds for Gas Recovery Treatment at OII Site 
Prohibited.--No funds available in the Hazardous Substances Superfund 
may be used for the construction or operation of a gas recovery 
treatment facility at the site known as the OII landfill site, located 
approximately 10 miles east of downtown Los Angeles and covering 190 
acres, divided by California Highway 60 (Pomona Freeway) and adjacent 
to the City of Montebello on the South, and the City of Monterey Park 
on the North.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 25, 2007, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. section 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Elgar Electronics in San Diego, CA has changed its name to Xantrex Technology, Inc.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On May 29, 2001, Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundations, Inc. filed its original notifications pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 30, 2001 (66 FR 39336).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 8, 2007. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 13, 2007 (72 FR 38617).                

J. Robert Kramer, II,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 07-4129  Filed 8-22-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
----

----

|   | 1.  | Viropro’s      Quaterly Report on Form 10-Q for the year ended March 31, 2010, and to      which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic      Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  |
|--------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2.  | The      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Lexicon.                                                                                                                                                 |

|   | By:    | /s/      Serge Beausoleil                  |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Serge      Beausoleil                      |
|   |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |

|   | By:    | /s/      Claude Gingras                 |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |   | Claude      Gingras                     |
|   |   | Vice      President, Corprorate Affairs |

----