alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 14 (Friday, January 22, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 3799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01287]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9025-2]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www2.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
Filed 01/11/2016 Through 01/15/2016
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-nepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20160011, Final, USFS, WV, 2016-2020 Fernow Experimental 
Forest, Review Period Ends: 02/22/2016, Contact: Thomas M. Schuler 304-
478-2000.
EIS No. 20160012, Final, FHWA, LA, Baton Rouge Loop Tier 1, Review 
Period Ends: 02/22/2016, Contact: Todd Jeter 225-757-7612.
EIS No. 20160013, Final Supplement, USACE, MS, Mississippi Coastal 
Improvements Program, Comprehensive Barrier Island Restoration, Review 
Period Ends: 02/22/2016, Contact: Dr. Susan Rees 251-694-4141.
EIS No. 20160014, Final, USACE, CA, American River Common Features 
General Reevaluation, Review Period Ends: 02/22/2016, Contact: Anne 
Baker 916-557-7277.
EIS No. 20160015, Final, USACE, CA, West Sacramento Project, Review 
Period Ends: 02/22/2016, Contact: Sarah Ross Arrouzet 916-557-5256.

    Dated: January 19, 2016.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2016-01287 Filed 1-21-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viropro Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31
, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Lee, acting as Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Richard Lee

_______________________________

Richard Lee, Sole Director and Officer

(acts as Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Date:  July 12, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2208 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2208

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 
percentage of completion method of accounting shall not be required to 
be used with respect to contracts for the manufacture of property if no 
     payments are required to be made before the completion of the 
                     manufacture of such property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 4, 1995

  Mr. Ehlers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 
percentage of completion method of accounting shall not be required to 
be used with respect to contracts for the manufacture of property if no 
     payments are required to be made before the completion of the 
                     manufacture of such property.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCEPTION FROM PERCENTAGE OF COMPLETION METHOD FOR CERTAIN 
              MANUFACTURING CONTRACTS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 460(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rule for manufacturing 
contracts) is amended by striking ``unless'' and all that follows and 
inserting ``unless--
                    ``(A) such contract involves the manufacture of--
                            ``(i) any unique item of a type which is 
                        not normally included in the finished goods 
                        inventory of the taxpayer, or
                            ``(ii) any item which normally requires 
                        more than 12 calendar months to complete 
                        (without regard to the period of the contract), 
                        and
                    ``(B) any payment for the manufacture of such item 
                is required to be made before the manufacture of such 
                item is completed.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to contracts entered into after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 250 (Thursday, December 29, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 95988-95989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31448]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9957-59-OW]

Notice of Open Meeting of the Environmental Financial Advisory 
Board (EFAB)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA's Environmental Financial Advisory Board (EFAB) will 
hold a public meeting on February 21-22, 2017. EFAB is an EPA advisory 
committee chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act to provide 
advice and recommendations to EPA on creative approaches to funding 
environmental programs, projects, and activities.
    The purpose of this meeting is to hear from informed speakers on 
environmental finance issues, proposed legislation, and EPA priorities. 
Additional discussion will focus on activities, progress, and 
preliminary recommendations with regard to current EFAB work projects 
and to consider request for assistance from EPA offices. Environmental 
finance discussions and presentations are expected on, but not limited 
to, the following topics: Public-private partnerships for water 
infrastructure projects, decentralized wastewater systems, materials 
conservation and recycling, and lead risk reduction. The meeting is 
open to

[[Page 95989]]

the public; however, seating is limited. All members of the public who 
wish to attend the meeting must register in advance, no later than 
Monday, February 6, 2017. Registration is required for all members of 
the public to ensure an expeditious security process.

DATES: The full board meeting will be held Tuesday, February 21, 2017 
from 1:30 p.m.-5:00 p.m., and Wednesday, February 22, 2017 from 9:00 
a.m.-5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: District Architecture Center, 421 7th Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information on access or services 
for individuals with disabilities, or to request accommodations for a 
disability, please contact Sandra Williams at (202) 564-4999 or 
williams.sandra@epa.gov, at least 10 days prior to the meeting to allow 
as much time as possible to process your request.

Andrew D. Sawyers,
Director, Office of Wastewater Management, Office of Water.
[FR Doc. 2016-31448 Filed 12-28-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Biovest International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas F. Belleau, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant tO ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                                        /s/Thomas F. Belleau
                                        --------------------
                                        Thomas F. Belleau
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        February 18, 2003









                                                                              24
§ 1108.8 Relief. ( a ) *Relief available.* An arbitrator may grant relief in the form of monetary damages or a rate prescription in rate disputes to the extent they are available under this subpart or as agreed to in writing by the parties. A rate prescription shall not exceed 5 years.
( b ) *Relief not available.* No injunctive relief shall be available in Board arbitration proceedings.
[78 FR 29079, May 17, 2013, as amended at 81 FR 69416, Oct. 6, 2016; 88 FR 729, Jan. 4, 2023]
-----Original Message----- 

From: ara.cruz@colorado.edu [mailto:ara.cruz@colorado.edu] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:24 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ara Cruz 

2855 W. 23rd Ave. Apt. 6 

Denver, CO 80211
-----Original Message----- 

From: bluenavigator@gmail.com [mailto:bluenavigator@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:42 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

jesse carton 

526 ashbury st. #4 

san francisco, CA 94117
-----Original Message----- 

From: cccjdc@ctcweb.net [mailto:cccjdc@ctcweb.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:34 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Connie Cunningham 

2621 Highway 95 

Council, ID 83612
-----Original Message----- 

From: tutumarie@hotmail.com [mailto:tutumarie@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:51 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Linda Marie 

761 Elizabeth Street 

Denver, CO 80206
YXIHEA~%OPNEY GENERAL. 

OX? TEXAS 

PRICEDANIEL ATTORNEY GNERAL 

biay 24, 1948 

Hon, Graham BPuce 

County AttoPneg 

Omnge County 

Orange p Texas 

Opinion No. V-585 

Rae: Tire llmitatlon, ii 

any9 befoPe an election to incoPpoPate a 

school a~stPic?t My 

follow an dlection 

which abolished an 

fndependent school 

aistpict * 

Dear Sips 

stance as 

We pefep to youp le%teP which peade In subfollows “, 

city 

On MaPch 20, 1948, fn the Brfdge 

Independent School Dfstaict-of 

Wang8 r;ountg an election wa8 h8Pd wdsr Article 2767, Pesultfng in a uJoPltg favoring the abolishmen% of the Independent DfstPict, A petftion has been 

presented to the Cotq~ty Yudge 0% OPange 

County in pPoper POP8 requesting an eleetion to i&ooP)oPate said distP%ot aondep 

Article 2757 0 

Questions After ,an independent 

school distpiot has been aboU:shed und8P ktlcle 2767, 9s there any time Iiaitation befoP an election can be had 

to IncoPpoPate under k%fole 2757? 

Ue assu8e for puPposes of this opinion that 

the teppitopy forae~ly compPi3ing the B~Ulge Gftq &x&ependent School Dlat~fet fa now cOn%ain8d in an 6xi~tlq 

xomon school Metrlct and, as suohl fe a aonoa UstPlct authopiebd to IncixpoPate m~dep ktfcle 27579 

APticle 2767, Ve~non”o CIvIp Itrtute,, )Povides for the call 

2 

wad holding of eleQ%ions Sor the 

abolishment or an 1 spended% school distPiet. APtic1e 

2757 pPovldes.foP the calling and holding of elections 
Hon. GPahm Bruce, page 2 b-585) 

for the incorporation of a comon school district oentaining aeven hundred inhabitants or mom. fkithsr of 

thoss statutes, mer sag otlw, attempts %a fix any p8riod of time to lmterv6ne between elections to abolish, 

eleotions to Incorporate, op elections to lncorpqrlte 

after a n l lectlon to abolish has suaoessfully carfled 

O)lrlen O-2572, 

Thbrefere, after an iBdep6RdeB% sohoel dis* 

trlct has been abeliahed under &ticle. 2767$ tbme his 

no tine Limitation before an election oati be kad %e i8- 

oeqorrte under the provisioxw of Article 2757. 

After an independent 8chool cLis%rict 

had been abolished un&@ Aptiale 2767, Vb 

cl? se, there IB DO tire liti%a%lOn bsfwe 

an electlen can be hrd to incorperate ump the p~ovlsiona of &Mole 27579 V, ,C. 

0 

YouPr VSPJ tPulJ#
Summary of Interagency Working Comments on Draft Language under EOs 

12866 and 13563 Interagency Review. Subject to Further Policy Review.

Page 1 of 1

Area Sources: 

Clarification of the term “unaffected gas-fired boiler”. (page 71).

Comment – The use of the term “unaffected gas-fired boiler” in the rule is confusing. 

Discussion – Section 63.11194(d) describes an unaffected gas-fired boiler as follows: “An unaffected 

gas-fired boiler is a new affected source if, after March 21, 2014, you commenced fuel switching from 

natural gas to solid fossil fuel, biomass, or liquid fuel and no longer meet the definition of a gas-fired 

boiler.” This term is not used elsewhere in the rule and is confusing. The use of the word unaffected 

implies it is not subject to the rule yet this is really defining a boiler that was once unaffected that 

becomes affected.

Suggestion – Revise section 63.11194(d) to read: “An previously unaffected gas-fired boiler is a new 

affected source if, after March 21, 2014, you commenced fuel switching from natural gas to solid fossil 

fuel, biomass, or liquid fuel and the boiler no longer meets the definition of a gas-fired boiler.”

Suggestions to address Editorial Issues:

- Change the instructions for amendment 2 (page 71) from “Section 63.11194 is amended by 

revising paragraphs (d) and (e) and adding paragraph (f) to read as follows:” to “Section 

63.11194 is amended by revising paragraph (d), by redesignating paragraph (e) as paragraph (f) 

and adding new paragraph (e) to read as follows:”

- In 63.11194(c) you might want to change “you meet” to “the boiler meets” since the applicability 

criteria applies to the boiler and not the owner. 

- Part of the text in the definition of “Residential boiler” is underlined but is probably not 

intended to be underlined in the CFR.

- Revise the definition of “periods of gas curtailment or supply interruption” (page 117) for 

consistency with the same definition in the major source rule. Either delete the word “may” in 

the last sentence of the definition in the area source rule or add the word “may” to the 

definition in the major source rule.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20
- 0353 EDWARD ZABROCKI,

Petit io ner and Appellant,
v. THE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee. SECOND ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMEN T

M arc G. Buyske , th e mediator previously appointed in thi s matter, has notified the Court th at he declines th e appo int me nt . Accordingly, Mr. B uyske ’s order of m ediator ap point me nt is hereby rescinded and IT IS ORDERED THAT **Alice J.**  **Hinshaw, 1**  **N Last**  **Chance Gulch,**  **Suite 1,**  **Helena, MT**  **59601, (406**  **)442 -**  **1925, alice@hinshawlaw.net**  **,** whose name appears next on th e list of attorneys desi ring appo int me nt as mediators fo r Money Judgment appeals wh ich is m aintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appo int ed to c onduct the mediat io n process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appoint me nt . A true copy

of this order is being mailed to counsel of reco rd f or the parti es, or to th e parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED thi s 29 th day

of July, 2020
.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of the Supreme Court 07/29/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0353
-----Original Message----- 

From: corg2258@sbcglobal.net [mailto:corg2258@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:46 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

annette corgiat 

2258 14th avenue 

north riverside, IL 60546
-----Original Message----- 

From: isabelsanden@comcast.net [mailto:isabelsanden@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 4:33 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Isabel Sanden 

16783 39th Ave NE 

Seattle, WA 98155 

Sincerely, 

isabel sanden 

16783 39th ave ne 

lfp, WA 98155
[Crim. No. 3462.

Second Dist., Div. One.

June 26, 1941.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. G. R. VAN METER et al., Defendants; L. McWHORTER Appellant.

Robert E. Ford for Appellant.

Earl Warren, Attorney General, Frank Richards, Deputy Attorney General, John F. Dockweiler, District Attorney, and Jere J. Sullivan, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.

WHITE, J.

On May 26, 1938, an information was filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County in which appellant and his codefendants were accused in seven counts of violation of the Corporate Securities Act (Stats. 1917, p. 673, and amendments thereto; Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 3814), by reason of the issuance and sale of certain securities without first having obtained a permit so to do from the Commissioner of Corporations of the State of California. Following pleas of guilty in that case to counts 3 and 6 of the information, appellant was sentenced to a term of one year in the Los Angeles County jail on both counts to which he entered a guilty plea, and it was directed that the sentences run concurrently. Execution of such sentences was thereupon suspended and appellant placed on probation upon condition that he serve the first six months of the sentences in the county jail as a term of probation.

*805On September 11, 1940, another information was filed against appellant herein, resulting in his conviction upon two counts thereof charging violation of the Corporate Securities Act. As a result of such convictions, appellant was on March 12, 1940, sentenced to imprisonment in the State Prison at San Quentin for the term prescribed by law. Prom such judgment of conviction appellant duly perfected an appeal.

When the court pronounced the sentence just mentioned he also made the following order, revoking the probation granted in the former ease: ‘1 * * * because of the conviction suffered in ease No. 82090 the court now revokes probation in this case No. 72361, and orders the defendant committed on the sentence imposed in case No. 72361 ° * * .”

The sole ground upon which this appeal was taken is that in the event the judgment in the second prosecution should be reversed, then the order revoking the probation granted in the former case, and which order was made contemporaneously with the pronouncement of judgment in the latter case, should also be reversed. Appellant concedes that should the judgment of conviction in the second prosecution be upheld, then the order revoking probation in the first case should be sustained.

Since we have this day filed a decision affirming the judgment in the second ease *(People*v. *Stowell,*Crim. No. 3463 *[ante,*p. 580 [114 Pac. (2d) 614]), the judgment and the order revoking probation from which this appeal was taken are, and each is, affirmed.

York, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.