alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.59 Plastic pipe. ( a ) New plastic pipe is qualified for use under this part if: ( 1 ) It is manufactured in accordance with a listed specification;
( 2 ) It is resistant to chemicals with which contact may be anticipated; and
( 3 ) It is free of visible defects.
( b ) Used plastic pipe is qualified for use under this part if: ( 1 ) It was manufactured in accordance with a listed specification;
( 2 ) It is resistant to chemicals with which contact may be anticipated;
( 3 ) It has been used only in gas service;
( 4 ) Its dimensions are still within the tolerances of the specification to which it was manufactured; and
( 5 ) It is free of visible defects.
( c ) For the purpose of paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(1) of this section, where pipe of a diameter included in a listed specification is impractical to use, pipe of a diameter between the sizes included in a listed specification may be used if it: ( 1 ) Meets the strength and design criteria required of pipe included in that listed specification; and
( 2 ) Is manufactured from plastic compounds which meet the criteria for material required of pipe included in that listed specification.
( d ) Rework and/or regrind material is not allowed in plastic pipe produced after March 6, 2015 used under this part.
[35 FR 13257, Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 192-19, 40 FR 10472, Mar. 6, 1975; Amdt. 192-58, 53 FR 1635, Jan. 21, 1988; Amdt. 192-119, 80 FR 180, Jan. 5, 2015; Amdt. 192-124, 83 FR 58716, Nov. 20, 2018]
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALVARD MKRTCHYAN; LILIT

MKRTCHYAN,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-70224

Agency Nos. A095-875-216

 A095-875-217

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Alvard Mkrtchyan and Lilit Mkrtchyan, natives and citizens of Armenia,

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

FILED

SEP 24 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-70224

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial

evidence, Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009), and we deny

the petition for review. 

The record does not compel the conclusion that Mkrtchyan’s brief detention

and the threat she received rise to the level of past persecution. See Prasad v. INS,

47 F.3d 336, 339-40 (9th Cir. 1995) (minor abuse of Indo-Fijian during 4-6 hour

detention did not compel a finding of past persecution). Substantial evidence also

supports the agency’s finding that Mkrtchyan’s fear of future persecution is not

objectively reasonable. See Gu v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014, 1022 (9th Cir. 2006). 

Accordingly, petitioners’ asylum claim fails.

Because Mkrtchyan did not establish eligibility for asylum, it follows that

she did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See

Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006).

Finally, substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief

because Mkrtchyan failed to show that it is more likely than not that she would be

tortured if removed to Armenia. See Wakkary, 558 F.3d at 1067-68.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
§ 178.33b-9 Marking. ( a ) Each container must be clearly and permanently marked to show: ( 1 ) DOT-2S.
( 2 ) Name or symbol of person making the mark specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. Symbol, if used, must be registered with the Associate Administrator.
( b ) [Reserved]
[74 FR 2268, Jan. 14, 2009]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

I, Manfred F. Dyck, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Hydromer,Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Hydromer, Inc.

 

Date:November 17, 2011	By: /s/ Manfred F. Dyck 	

	 Manfred F. Dyck

	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
-----Original Message----- 

From: rainbowfinance@earthlink.net 

[mailto:rainbowfinance@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:01 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Claudia Kaplan 

121 S. Estes Dr. #203A 

Chapel Hill, NC 27514
# Alliance

Plug

- in Hybrid Electric V ehicle

Emissions Illus tr at ion

11/18/13

# Gener al PHEV Char ge Depleting

Oper at ion

Te st Cycle or “Bag ” Sample P eriodStateofCharge,UsableWallEnergy

# Char ge Depleting Engine Oper at ion,

EREV

Te st Cycle or “Bag ” Sample P eriodStateofCharge,UsableWallEnergy



# Discr ete Engine St arts

= Engine On

# Char ge Depleting Modal Emissions

Te st Cycle or “Bag ” Sample P eriodStateofCharge,UsableWallEnergy



# = Engine OnEmissions,Modalg/mi 

# Emissions St andar d Modal Emissions

# Emission St andar ds Ov erla y with

Cumula tiv e Emissions

Te st Cycle or “Bag ” Sample P eriodStateofCharge,UsableWallEnergy



# = Engine OnEmissions,Modalg/mi



# Cumulative W eight ed

Emissions, appr oaches

Char ge Sustaining Emissions

fr om below the standar d

# Window of Oper at ion

Te st Cycle or “Bag ” Sample P eriodStateofCharge,UsableWallEnergy



# = Engine OnEmissions,Modalg/mi 

# St andar ds ar e ex ceeded only if view of

oper ation is r es tricted to small window

# Char ge Depletion Engine Oper at ion,

Blended Mode PHEV

Te st Cycle or “Bag ” Sample P eriodStateofCharge,UsableWallEnergy



# = Engine On

# Char ge Depleting Oper at ion, Blended

Mode

Te st Cycle or “Bag ” Sample P eriodStateofCharge,UsableWallEnergy



# = Engine On Emissions St andar dEmissions,Modalg/mi 

# Cumulative W eight ed

Emissions

# Char ge Depleting Oper at ion, Blended

Mode

Te st Cycle or “Bag ” Sample P eriodStateofCharge,UsableWallEnergy



# = Engine OnEmissions,Modalg/mi 

# This could be a concern

# Summary

• Alliance pr oposes the use of a s tate men t of

compliance including AE CD pr ovisions to cover

char ge depleting emissions

• This s tate men t could be verified with an “ all

encompassing ” emissions measur emen t.

– Clean solution, “ simple” to measur e

– Under sta ndable, not open to misinterpr etat ion

– Consisten t with other policy such as:

• IRAF

• Current ARB blended mode crit eria emissions measuremen t
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending December 14, 2013

|Filer                         | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|NORTH VALLEY BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC           | Interagency Notice of Change in Control submitted by Clay Graham, Zanesville, OH; Bryan Graham, Zanesville, OH; Colby James Graham, Zanesville, OH; Courtney Lynelle Graham, Columbus, OH; Adam Hamilton Graham, Bexley, OH; and Mark David Weiser and Debra Kay Weiser, Zanesville, OH (collectively the Graham Family Control Group) of their intent to retain control of 25 percent or more of the ourstanding voting shares of North Valley Bancshares, Inc., Zanesville, OH. | Newspaper:12/19/2013Federal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                    | 12/19/2013   
|Federal Register:             | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT
99.1







CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I,
Manfred F. Dyck, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Hydromer, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30,
2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Hydromer, Inc.







Date:
      November 13, 2008
              
              By:
      /s/Manfred F. Dyck,
      CEOManfred
      F. DyckChairman,
      President and Chief Executive
Officer
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-1251 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-017-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 1.0 $ 85.00 $ 85.00 73 $6,205.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $6,205

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Inspection, 

Replacement 6 $ 510.00 $0 $ 510.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
From: enakllib@yahoo.com [mailto:enakllib@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:26 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

William Kane 

8351 246 st 

Bellerose, NY 11426
§ 1300.4 Notice requirement. ( a ) A rail carrier may not increase any rates or charges, or change any service terms (except for changes that are equivalent to rate reductions), unless 20 days have expired after written or electronic notice has been provided to all persons who, within the previous 12 months: ( 1 ) Have formally requested under ;§ 1300.2 or § 1300.3 of this part the affected rates or service terms; or
( 2 ) Have made arrangements with the carrier for a future shipment that would be subject to the increased rates or changed service terms.
( b ) The notice required by this section may be in written or electronic form, as agreed to by the parties. If the parties cannot agree, the information is to be provided in electronic (non-passive) form where both parties have the requisite capabilities; otherwise, it is to be provided in writing.
( c ) For purposes of this section, a mailed notice is deemed “provided” on the date such notice is postmarked.
( d ) The notice required by this section must clearly identify the increases in rates or charges or the changes in service terms.
Editorial Note on Part 193
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

§ 193.2615 Isolating and purging. ( a ) Before personnel begin maintenance activities on components handling flammable fluids which are isolated for maintenance, the component must be purged in accordance with a procedure which meets the requirements of “Purging Principles and Practices (incorporated by reference, *see* § 193.2013)”; unless the maintenance procedures under § 193.2605 provide that the activity can be safely performed without purging.
( b ) If the component or maintenance activity provides an ignition source, a technique in addition to isolation valves (such as removing spool pieces or valves and blank flanging the piping, or double block and bleed valving) must be used to ensure that the work area is free of flammable fluids.
[Amdt. 193-2, 45 FR 70405, Oct. 23, 1980, as amended by Amdt. 193-25, 80 FR 184, Jan. 5, 2015]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          33,864
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  155,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    556,612
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               761,104
<PP&E>                                         461,418
<DEPRECIATION>                               (337,419)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 886,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,902,824
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       536,396
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,552,267)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   886,953
<SALES>                                        838,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               838,678
<CGS>                                        3,536,869
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,313,827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               103,406
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,594,932)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,594,932)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,594,932)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)


</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 13, 1995 (78), Para 78.25 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 893]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.78.25  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. LEACH: Committee on Banking and Financial Services. 
     Supplemental report on H.R. 1062. A bill to enhance 
     competition in the financial services industry by providing a 
     prudential framework for the affiliation of banks, securities 
     firms, and other financial service providers (Rept. 104-127, 
     Pt. 2).
       Mrs. VUCANOVICH: Committee on Appropriations. H.R. 1817. A 
     bill making appropriations for military construction, family 
     housing, and base realignment and closure for the Department 
     of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and 
     for other purposes (Rept. 104-137). Referred to the Committee 
     of the Whole House on the State of the Union.
```
**EXHIBIT31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTOF 1934**

I, Chester L. F.Paulson, certify that:

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Paulson Capital Corp.;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)):

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  [Reserved.]

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date:  August11, 2006

/s/Chester L. F. PaulsonChester L. F. PaulsonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerPaulson Capital Corp.

----
EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Manfred F. Dyck, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Hydromer, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the six months ended December 31,
2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results
of operations of Hydromer, Inc.

Date: February 11, 2005                     By: /s/ Manfred F. Dyck
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Manfred F. Dyck
                                            Chairman, President and Chief
                                             Executive Officer