alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
         financial statements of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership
         II for the six months ended June 30, 1998, and is qualified in its
         entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                          JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                     71,531
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              73,771
<ALLOWANCES>                                               66,506
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          470,527
<PP&E>                                                 10,196,288
<DEPRECIATION>                                          5,622,421
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          5,288,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     799,063
<BONDS>                                                 5,295,932
<COMMON>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            5,288,041
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        1,011,566
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           1,105,905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        251,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (94,340)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (94,340)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               (9.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0
        

</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: hoytws2@att.net [mailto:hoytws2@att.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:15 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Saral L. Hoyt MD 

43 Sheffield Circle 

Asheville, NC 28803
§ 1544.233 Security coordinators and crewmembers, training. ( a ) No aircraft operator may use any individual as a Ground Security Coordinator unless, within the preceding 12-calendar months, that individual has satisfactorily completed the security training as specified in the aircraft operator's security program.
( b ) No aircraft operator may use any individual as an in-flight security coordinator or crewmember on any domestic or international flight unless, within the preceding 12-calendar months or within the time period specified in an Advanced Qualifications Program approved under SFAR 58 in 14 CFR part 121, that individual has satisfactorily completed the security training required by 14 CFR 121.417(b)(3)(v) or 135.331(b)(3)(v), and as specified in the aircraft operator's security program.
( c ) With respect to training conducted under this section, whenever an individual completes recurrent training within one calendar month earlier, or one calendar month after the date it was required, that individual is considered to have completed the training in the calendar month in which it was required.
-----Original Message----- 

From: lrags@sbcglobal.net [mailto:lrags@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:01 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lynda Ragsdale 

1422 Glourie Dr. 

Houston, TX 77055
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 15-20382 

 Honorable Victoria A. Roberts 

PAUL NICOLETTI, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION IN LIMINE 

 Inasmuch as Defendant does not oppose the Government’s motion in limine 

regarding the “hopes and dreams” defense outlined in the Government’s papers, the 

Government’s motion in limine is GRANTED. 

IT IS ORDERED. 

 s/ Victoria A. Roberts 

 Victoria A. Roberts 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: 4/2/19 

Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 116 filed 04/02/19 PageID.1162 Page 1 of 1
TS-EMLA40 

Attachment #7

Pt. 2, Sec. B, 1a 

Processing Information on the New Chemical Substance at Industrial Sites 

Controlled by Others 
TS-EMLA40 
Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical Substances at 

Industrial Sites Controlled by Others – Processing of Adhesion Promoters (LAS)
Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical 

Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by Others – Processing of Emulsifiers
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/              David Salzman                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |   |   |        |
| David                SalzmanChief                Executive Officer of RichmanTax                Credit Properties Inc., general partner                of Richman Tax Credit PropertiesL.P.,                General Partner of the RegistrantMarch                14, 2008 |   |   |        |

----
#### Samuel D. Coykendall and Jacob H. Tremper, Respondents, v. William Voorhis and Thomas Magee, Appellants, Imploaded, etc.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
#### John Fallon, *Respondent, v.*Rosanna Lawler, *Appellant.*

Judgment reversed and a now trial granted, costs to abide event, order of reference vacated. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, August 3, 1995 (108), Para 108.6 Labor, HHS, Education Appropriations, FY 1996]
[Page 1249]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.108.6  labor, hhs, education appropriations, fy 1996

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mrs. WALDHOLTZ, pursuant to House Resolution 
208 and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of 
the Whole House on the state of the Union for the further consideration 
of the bill (H.R. 2127) making appropriations for the Departments of 
Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and related agencies, 
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes.
  Mr. WALKER, Chairman of the Committee of the Whole, resumed the chair; 
and after some time spent therein,
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determine d that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40428

TOM FLEMING,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TOWN OF RANCHO VIEJO, TEXAS, ET AL.,

Defendants,

TOWN OF RANCHO VIEJO, TEXAS,

Defendant-Appellant,

versus

GASPAR ALVAREZ HERNANDEZ,

Intervenor DefendantAppellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

(B-90-CV-152)

December 9, 1996 Before REAVLEY, GARWOOD and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. *2

PER CURIAM:

As defendant-appellant correctly points out, the magistrate

judge, who purported to enter a final judgment in this case, lacked

jurisdiction to do so because several of the parties, including the

defendant Town of Rancho Viejo and the five individual defendants

other than Hallem an, did not consent to entry of judgment by the

magistrate judge as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) and Fed. R.

Civ. P. 73(b). This was pointed out below by objections to the

magistrate judge’s purported judgment. We note that although

individual defendant Halleman did consent, and was the mayor of the

Town of Rancho Viejo, he did not purport to consent on its behalf,

or sign the consent as “Mayor,” or otherwise than simply in his own

name. See EEOC v. West La. Health Services, Inc ., 959 F.2d 1277,

1281-82 (5th Cir. 1992); Caprera v. Jacobs

, 790 F.2d 442, 445-46

(5th Cir. 1986); Parks v. Collins , 761 F.2d 1101, 1106 (5th Cir.

1985). Accordingly, the purported final judgment entered by the

magistrate judge is vacated and the cause is remanded.

VACATED and REMANDED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICK EATON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

MARK J SIEMENS; CARLOS A.

URRUTIA; CITY OF ROCKLIN,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-16366

D.C. No. 2:07-cv-00315-MCECKD

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Morrison C. England, Jr., Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 11, 2014 

San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and PRATT, Senior

District Judge.** 

FILED

APR 30 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, Senior United States District Judge

for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.
Plaintiff-Appellant Rick Eaton appeals the district court’s dismissal of his

complaint on claim preclusion grounds. Pursuant to a memorandum of

understanding between the City of Rocklin and the Rocklin Police Officers’

Association, Eaton arbitrated his termination from the Rocklin Police Department. 

The arbitrator found good cause for Eaton’s termination, and the city manager

accepted the decision without modification. Eaton did not pursue any review in

state court and instead filed an action in district court, alleging that he was

terminated in violation of his constitutional rights as well as several state statutes.

We affirm the district court’s dismissal of the complaint as barred by res judicata.

The Supreme Court held in United States v. Utah Construction & Mining

Co., 384 U.S. 394, 422 (1966), that administrative proceedings may be given

preclusive effect if they have sufficient judicial character. The Supreme Court in

University of Tennessee v. Elliott, 478 U.S. 788, 796–99 (1986), then held that

courts may give preclusive effect to unreviewed state administrative proceedings. 

This court has held in White v. City of Pasadena, 671 F.3d 918, 928–29 (9th Cir.

2012), that an arbitration proceeding like the one in this case has sufficient judicial

character. 

California’s claim preclusion doctrine provides that “[a] valid final judgment

on the merits in favor of a defendant serves as a complete bar to further litigation

2
on the same cause of action.” Slater v. Blackwood, 15 Cal. 3d 791, 795 (1975). To

determine what constitutes the same cause of action, California applies the primary

rights theory, “under which the invasion of one primary right gives rise to a single

cause of action.” Id. The primary right at stake in both the arbitration proceeding

and the district court action was Eaton’s right to continued employment with the

Rocklin Police Department. See Miller v. Cnty. of Santa Cruz, 39 F.3d 1030, 1034

(9th Cir. 1994); Takahashi v. Bd. of Trs., 783 F.2d 848, 851 (9th Cir. 1986). 

Applying California’s claim preclusion principles, the arbitration proceeding

precludes Eaton’s district court action.

AFFIRMED. 

3
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 158 (Thursday, August 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46093-46094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4018]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Obstetrics & Gynecology, 
Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
    Date: September 12, 2007.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
5B01, Rockville, MD (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6680, 
[email protected].

[[Page 46094]]

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 9, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-4018 Filed 8-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
From: em_darovic@yahoo.com [mailto:em_darovic@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:48 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Elizabeth Darovic 

31923 Birchwood Dr 

Lake Elsinore, CA 92532
EXHIBIT
      99.2







CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I,
      Robert
      Y. Lee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Hydromer, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the six months ended December 31, 2007 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of Hydromer, Inc.













Date:
      February 13,
      2008                                                                
By: /s/
      Robert Y. Lee


Robert
      Y.
      Lee


Chief
      Financial
      Officer and Vice President of Finance
## FILED Dec 05, 2023 09:50 AM(ET)
TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending September 21, 2013

|Filer                    | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------ | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|FARMERS BANKSHARES, INC. | * 3A1       | Farmers Bankshares, Inc., Windsor, Virginia, to become a bank holding company through the acquisition of 100% of Farmers Bank, Windsor, Virginia | Newspaper:10/09/2013Federal Register:10/17/2013
|Newspaper:               | 10/09/2013 
|Federal Register:        | 10/17/2013 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 172.331 Bulk packagings other than portable tanks, cargo tanks, tank cars and multi-unit tank car tanks. ( a ) Each person who offers a hazardous material to a motor carrier for transportation in a bulk packaging shall provide the motor carrier with the required identification numbers on placards or plain white square-on-point display configurations, as authorized, or shall affix orange panels containing the required identification numbers to the packaging prior to or at the time the material is offered for transportation, unless the packaging is already marked with the identification number as required by this subchapter.
( b ) Each person who offers a bulk packaging containing a hazardous material for transportation shall affix to the packaging the required identification numbers on orange panels, square-on-point configurations or placards, as appropriate, prior to, or at the time the packaging is offered for transportation unless it is already marked with identification numbers as required by this subchapter.
( c ) For a bulk packaging contained in or on a transport vehicle or freight container, if the identification number marking on the bulk packaging (e.g., an IBC) required by § 172.302(a) is not visible, the transport vehicle or freight container must be marked as required by § 172.332 on each side and each end with the identification number specified for the material in the § 172.101 table.
[Amdt. 172-123, 55 FR 52593, Dec. 21, 1994, as amended by Amdt. 172-151, 62 FR 1228, Jan. 8, 1997; 62 FR 39398, July 22, 1997]
From: djsorkin@wisc.edu [mailto:djsorkin@wisc.edu] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:20 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

david sorkin 

711 s. orchard apt. 203 

madison, WI 53715
#### Loretta D. Ogden, Respondent, v. Merrick Ogden, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.