alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending June 22, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P. (the
      “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Neal
      Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc., general
      partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., General Partner of the
      Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.




/s/
      Neal Ludeke


Neal
      Ludeke


Chief
      Financial Officer of Richman


Tax
      Credit Properties Inc., general


partner
      of Richman Tax Credit Properties


L.P.,
      General Partner of the Registrant


March
      14,
      2008
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - II (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General Partner and
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

        (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and result of the
             operations of the Partnership.


              November 15, 2004                  /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
              -----------------                  ------------------------------
                    Date                         Joseph M. Jayson,
                                                 Individual General Partner and
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
From: joantanner@wildblue.net [mailto:joantanner@wildblue.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:15 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Joan Tanner 

N.W. McNamee Road 

Poetland, OR 97231
From: mhodgson@bu.edu [mailto:mhodgson@bu.edu] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:05 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Mark Hodgson 

235 Woburn Street 

Medford, MA 02155
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, September 12, 1995 (113), Para 113.28 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 1162]
[Page 1328]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.113.28  providing for the consideration of h.r. 1162

  Mr. GOSS, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. No. 
104-243) the resolution (H. Res. 218) providing for the consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 1162) to establish a Deficit Reduction Trust Fund and 
provide for the downward adjustment of discretionary spending limits in 
appropriations bills.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending November 30, 2013

----

Bank Holding Companies            Investors Bancorp, MHC, Short Hills, New Jersey, and Investors Bancorp, Inc. -- to acquire Roma Financial Corporation, MHC, Robbinsville, and Roma Financial Corporation and thereby indirectly acquire Roma Bank and RomAsia Bank, South Brunswick Township (FRB Order No. 2013-11).            -Approved, November 27, 2013            Forms            Forms -- final Board review to implement the Report of Selected Money Market Rates (FR 2420).            -Approved, November 25, 2013            Regulations and Policies            Payment System Risk Policy -- publication for comment of proposed rules to (1) modify the posting rules for automated clearinghouse and commercial check transactions and (2) make related changes to Regulation J.            -Approved, November 22, 2013            (A/C)          
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
-----Original Message----- 

From: cox.adele@gmail.com [mailto:cox.adele@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:25 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

adele cox 

45 Fulton St 

Redwood City, CA 94062
From: ranetek@att.net [mailto:ranetek@att.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:19 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Daniel Abrams 

4911 W. Belle Plaine Ave 

Chicago, IL 60641
Exhibit 24



Power of Attorney

The undersigned hereby appoint Joseph C. Benage as attorney-in-fact, to execute in name and on behalf of the undersigned the Form 10-K Annual Report of LabOne, Inc., to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

Dated: March 1, 2005

/s/ Jill L. Force
Jill L. Force, Director

/s/ John P. Mascotte
John P. Mascotte, Director

/s/ James R. Seward
James R. Seward, Director

/s/ John E. Walker
John E. Walker, Director
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 7231

DONALD CARL STOUT , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. PRESTON COUNTY SHERIFF ’ S DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF DANIEL LOUGHRIE; DEPUTY RANDY STOCKETT; OFFICER OKAN, K

- 9 Dog , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Clarksburg

. Thomas S. Kleeh , Chief District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv - 00123

- TSK )

Submitted : May 27, 2022 Decided: June 14, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

R emanded by un published per curiam opinion

. Donald Carl Stout, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7231 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/14/2022 Pg: 1 of 32 PER CURIAM : Donald Carl Stout seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Stout’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint

. Parties to a civil action are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). But the district court may exten d the time to file a notice of appeal if a party moves for an extension of the appeal period within 30 days after expiration of the original appeal period and demonstrates excusable neglect or good cause to warrant an extension. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles

v . Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court entered the judgment on March 31, 2021 . The 30

- day appeal period set by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) expired on April 30, 2021, and the subsequent 30

- day period to file a motion for an extension of t ime pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) expired on June 1, 2021. This court received Stout’s misrouted notice of appeal dated August 2, 2021, which suggests that Stout’s appeal wa s untimely. However, on April 5, 2021, Stout submitted a letter to the dist rict court in which he notified the court of his change of address, expressed an interest in appealing, requested de novo review, and requested that his letter serve as a motion if necessary

. It is unclear whether Stout intended for this letter to serve a s a notice of appeal, a motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal, or a motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order. See generally Clark v. Cartledge , 829 F.3d 303, 305

- 07 (4th Cir. 2016) (discussing deference afforded to pro se pleadings evincing an intent to appeal). USCA4 Appeal: 21-7231 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/14/2022 Pg: 2 of 33 Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to determine whether Stout timely noted an appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). The record, as supplemented, will then be r eturned to this court for further consideration.
REMANDED USCA4 Appeal: 21-7231 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/14/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
§ 199.239 Operator obligation to promulgate a policy on the misuse of alcohol. ( a ) *General requirements.* Each operator shall provide educational materials that explain these alcohol misuse requirements and the operator's policies and procedures with respect to meeting those requirements. ( 1 ) The operator shall ensure that a copy of these materials is distributed to each covered employee prior to start of alcohol testing under this subpart, and to each person subsequently hired for or transferred to a covered position.
( 2 ) Each operator shall provide written notice to representatives of employee organizations of the availability of this information.
( b ) *Required content.* The materials to be made available to covered employees shall include detailed discussion of at least the following: ( 1 ) The identity of the person designated by the operator to answer covered employee questions about the materials.
( 2 ) The categories of employees who are subject to the provisions of this subpart.
( 3 ) Sufficient information about the covered functions performed by those employees to make clear what period of the work day the covered employee is required to be in compliance with this subpart.
( 4 ) Specific information concerning covered employee conduct that is prohibited by this subpart.
( 5 ) The circumstances under which a covered employee will be tested for alcohol under this subpart.
( 6 ) The procedures that will be used to test for the presence of alcohol, protect the covered employee and the integrity of the breath testing process, safeguard the validity of the test results, and ensure that those results are attributed to the correct employee.
( 7 ) The requirement that a covered employee submit to alcohol tests administered in accordance with this subpart.
( 8 ) An explanation of what constitutes a refusal to submit to an alcohol test and the attendant consequences.
( 9 ) The consequences for covered employees found to have violated the prohibitions under this subpart, including the requirement that the employee be removed immediately from covered functions, and the procedures under § 199.243.
( 10 ) The consequences for covered employees found to have an alcohol concentration of 0.02 or greater but less than 0.04.
( 11 ) Information concerning the effects of alcohol misuse on an individual's health, work, and personal life; signs and symptoms of an alcohol problem (the employee's or a coworker's); and including intervening evaluating and resolving problems associated with the misuse of alcohol including intervening when an alcohol problem is suspected, confrontation, referral to any available EAP, and/or referral to management.
( c ) *Optional provisions.* The materials supplied to covered employees may also include information on additional operator policies with respect to the use or possession of alcohol, including any consequences for an employee found to have a specified alcohol level, that are based on the operator's authority independent of this subpart. Any such additional policies or consequences shall be clearly described as being based on independent authority.
#### In the Matter of Proving the Will of Martha Gibson, Deceased. Bertha H. Green et al., Appellants; Leonard Hanford, Respondent.

*Matter of Gibson,*133 App. Div. 935, affirmed.

(Argued April 28, 1910;

decided June 7, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 18, 1910, which affirmed a decree of the Otsego County Surrogate’s Court admitting to probate the will of Martha Gibson, deceased.

*Edson A. Hayward*for appellants.

*J~. F. Thompson*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner and Hiscook, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                        26,231
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           687
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              13,375
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   91,970
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       116,356
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         115,923
<LOANS>                                      405,680
<ALLOWANCE>                                    6,184
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               683,042
<DEPOSITS>                                   593,236
<SHORT-TERM>                                   6,667
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            6,229
<LONG-TERM>                                   23,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,489
<COMMON>                                         593
<OTHER-SE>                                    50,828
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               683,042
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                8,434
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              2,902
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              11,336
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             4,738
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               580
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          6,018
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     75
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              (843)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                5,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  505
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       505
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     505
<EPS-BASIC>                                     3.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   3.44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  7.45
<LOANS-NON>                                      183
<LOANS-PAST>                                   1,370
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               6,188
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    100
<RECOVERIES>                                      21
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              6,184
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           6,184
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0


</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: jcrane33@gmail.com [mailto:jcrane33@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:24 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

jaclyn cranach 

POB 18 

Arroyo Seco, NM 87514
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending June 19, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location             | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|CITIZENS B&TC, VAN BUREN, ARKANSAS | 192147  | 01/11/2010 | 06/04/2010     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|FIRST CMNTY BK, MARION, ARKANSAS   | 2716828 | 10/20/2008 | 06/11/2010     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us