alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                    APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                    474
<SECURITIES>                                            2,099
<RECEIVABLES>                                             113
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                             1,245
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        3,957
<PP&E>                                                  1,732
<DEPRECIATION>                                            627
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          5,501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   1,111
<BONDS>                                                 1,745
<COMMON>                                                   44
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                              2,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            5,501
<SALES>                                                 2,384
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        2,968
<CGS>                                                   2,013
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           2,570
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         58
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           340
<INCOME-TAX>                                               99
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       241
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                              241
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             .06
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 30, 2019

a0422 

# Order

Clerk April 30, 2019

158207(18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 158207

COA: 343666

Genesee CC: 15

- 038060

- FC

JAMAR LANELL EVANS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s December 4,

2018 order is considered, and it is DENI ED, because we are not persuaded that

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
CLECO SECURITIZATION I LLCEXHIBIT 31.1





Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)





I, Vincent M. Sipowicz, Treasurer of Cleco Power LLC, as servicer (the “Servicer”), certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Cleco Securitization I LLC (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Storm Recovery Property Servicing Agreement dated as of June 22, 2022, between Cleco Securitization I LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer, in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association, as Indenture Trustee.





Date: March 27, 2023/s/ Vincent M. SipowiczVincent M. SipowiczTreasurer(Senior officer in charge of servicing function)Cleco Power LLC, as servicer
-----Original Message----- 

From: dave_m_brown@toast.net [mailto:dave_m_brown@toast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:20 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

David Brown 

PO Box 3571 

Ann Arbor, MI 48106
§ 1114.29 Supplementation of responses. A party who has responded to a request for discovery with a response that was complete when made is under a duty to supplement his response to include information thereafter acquired in the following instances: ( a ) A party is under a duty seasonably to supplement his response with respect to any question directly addressed to: ( 1 ) The identity and locations of persons having knowledge of discoverable matters, and
( 2 ) The identity of each person expected to be called as an expert witness at the hearing, the subject matter on which he is expected to testify, and the substance of his testimony.
( b ) A party who knows or later learns that his response is incorrect is under a duty seasonably to correct his response.
( c ) A duty to supplement responses may be imposed by order, agreement of the parties, or at any time prior to the hearing or the submission of verified statements under the modified procedure through new requests for supplementation of prior responses.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                                WASHINGTON, D.C.


                                   FORM 10-K/A


                       AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION OR REPORT
                    FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12, 13 or 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                           CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)


The undersigned registrant hereby amends the following items, financial
statements, exhibits or other portions of its Annual Report Pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1997, as set forth in the pages attached hereto.

Pursuant to Rule 15d-21 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
amendment is being made to add the information, financial statements, and
exhibits required by Form 11-K with respect to the Central Maine Power
Company Employee Savings and Investment Plan for Non-union Employees and to
the Central Maine Power Company Employee Savings and Investment Plan for
Union Employees, as Exhibits 99-1 and 99-2, respectively.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this amendment to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                            CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY


                                            By/s/Michael W. Caron  
                                            Michael W. Caron, Comptroller
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.905 How does an operator identify a high consequence area? ( a ) *General.* To determine which segments of an operator's transmission pipeline system are covered by this subpart, an operator must identify the high consequence areas. An operator must use method (1) or (2) from the definition in § 192.903 to identify a high consequence area. An operator may apply one method to its entire pipeline system, or an operator may apply one method to individual portions of the pipeline system. An operator must describe in its integrity management program which method it is applying to each portion of the operator's pipeline system. The description must include the potential impact radius when utilized to establish a high consequence area. (*See* appendix E.I. for guidance on identifying high consequence areas.)
( b ) ( 1 ) *Identified sites.* An operator must identify an identified site, for purposes of this subpart, from information the operator has obtained from routine operation and maintenance activities and from public officials with safety or emergency response or planning responsibilities who indicate to the operator that they know of locations that meet the identified site criteria. These public officials could include officials on a local emergency planning commission or relevant Native American tribal officials.
( 2 ) If a public official with safety or emergency response or planning responsibilities informs an operator that it does not have the information to identify an identified site, the operator must use one of the following sources, as appropriate, to identify these sites. ( i ) Visible marking (e.g., a sign); or
( ii ) The site is licensed or registered by a Federal, State, or local government agency; or
( iii ) The site is on a list (including a list on an internet web site) or map maintained by or available from a Federal, State, or local government agency and available to the general public.
( c ) *Newly identified areas.* When an operator has information that the area around a pipeline segment not previously identified as a high consequence area could satisfy any of the definitions in § 192.903, the operator must complete the evaluation using method (1) or (2). If the segment is determined to meet the definition as a high consequence area, it must be incorporated into the operator's baseline assessment plan as a high consequence area within one year from the date the area is identified.
Exhibit 23.1 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Files Nos. 2-71595, 33-14926, 2-79636, 33-14925, 33-14927, 33-53478,33-56487, 333-30763 and 333-50627) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-111452) of Chesapeake Corporation of our report dated March 1, 2005 relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

Richmond, Virginia 

March 7, 2005
-----Original Message----- 

From: gm@genemason.net [mailto:gm@genemason.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:03 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Gene Mason 

32 City Hall Sq. 

Lynn, MA 01901
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paulson Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Chester L. F. Paulson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Chester L. F. Paulson                                                                      
|Chester L. F. Paulson President and Chief Executive
Officer Paulson Capital Corp.  May 15, 2009

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Paulson Capital Corp. and will be retained by Paulson Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
-----Original Message----- 

From: barbrbrandt@hotmail.com [mailto:barbrbrandt@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:31 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Barbara Brandt 

514 E 5th 

Fulton, MO 65251
*Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-20007

Summary Calendar

CLARICE COLLINS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS; UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, BOARD OF REGENTS;

TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE; CARDIOPULMONARY PERFUSION ASSOCIATES

INCORPORATED; ST. LUKE’S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL; BONNIE CROMACK;

VALERIE CARROLL; TRUDY STAFFORD; FRANCIS FRANZ; SAL GUERCIO;

ANN GUERCIO; RHONDA KENNAMER; JOYCE BIGLEY; KIMBERLY WADE

SWAN; CAROLYN LETHRIDGE; DEBRA SURPRISE; SUZIE GLEASON;

RAYMOND MCINNIS,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(H-95-CV-715)

July 30, 1997

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Collins sued the corporate and individual defendants in this
2

case, alleging "intentional discrimination, based on race, gender

and retaliation due to plaintiff’s past challenges and complaints

of racial discrimination." Each defendant filed motions for

summary judgment which were referred by the district court to the

magistrate judge for review and recommendation. The magistrate

judge recommended that all defendants’ motions for summary judgment

be granted and the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be

denied. The district court reviewed the magistrate judge’s

memorandum and recommendation de novo and entered an order adopting

the memorandum and recommendation.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts and

relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated by

the magistrate judge in her memorandum and recommendation filed

under date of April 25, 1996, the district court was correct in

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendations and entering a

final judgment based thereon.

AFFIRMED.
CLECO CORPORATION
              EXHIBIT
  23(a)
 
 Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-10169, 33-26726, 33-38362, 33-44663, 333-44364, 333-59692,
333-59696, 333-124716 and 333-127496) of Cleco Corporation of our report dated
February 26, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial
statement schedules and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of Cleco Corporation, which appears in this Form 10-K.
  
 
 /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLPNew
      Orleans, LouisianaFebruary
      26, 2009
Exhibit 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mammatech Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 2007, (the
"Report"), I, Mary Sellers, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.


Date:  January 10, 2008
                                         /s/ Mary Sellers
                                         -------------------------------
                                         Mary Sellers, Chief Financial Officer




                                       14
CERTIFICATIONS

                                                        Exhibit 32.1

I, Steven V. Lant, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of CH Energy Group, Inc. and Central Hudson
      Gas & Electric Corporation (the "Companies") for the period ended December
      31, 2004 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and

2.    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Companies.

Date: February 11, 2005


                                              /s/ Steven V. Lant
                               -------------------------------------------------
                                                Steven V. Lant
                                     Chairman of the Board, President and
                               Chief Executive Officer of CH Energy Group, Inc.


                                              /s/ Steven V. Lant
                               -------------------------------------------------
                                                Steven V. Lant
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
                                 of Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CH Energy Group, Inc. and to Central Hudson Gas & Electric
Corporation and will be retained by CH Energy Group, Inc. and Central Hudson Gas
& Electric Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, September 18, 1995 (116), Para 116.20 Presidio Properties Administration]
[Page 1370]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.116.20  presidio properties administration

  Mr. HANSEN moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 1296) to 
provide for the Administration of certain Presidio properties at minimal 
cost to the Federal taxpayer; as amended.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. FOLEY, recognized Mr. HANSEN and Mr. 
RICHARDSON, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill, as amended?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. FOLEY, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  Mr. HANSEN demanded that the vote be taken by the yeas and nays, which 
demand was supported by one-fifth of the Members present, so the yeas 
and nays were ordered.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. FOLEY, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced that further proceedings on the motion were postponed until 
Tuesday, September 19, 1995, pursuant to the prior announcement of the 
Chair.
```
§ 56.25-20 Bolting. ( a ) ( 1 ) Bolts, studs, nuts, and washers must comply with applicable standards and specifications listed in § 56.60-1. Bolting must be in accordance with ASME B16.5 (incorporated by reference; see § 56.01-2).
( 2 ) Bolts and studs must extend completely through the nuts.
( 3 ) See § 58.30-15(c) of this subchapter for exceptions on bolting used in fluid power and control systems.
( b ) Carbon steel bolts or bolt studs may be used if operating pressure does not exceed 300 psig and the operating temperature does not exceed 400 °F. Carbon steel bolts must have heavy hexagon heads in accordance with ASME B18.2.1 (incorporated by reference, see § 56.01-2) and must have heavy semifinished hexagonal nuts in accordance with ASME B18.2.2 (incorporated by reference, see § 56.01-2).
( c ) Alloy steel stud bolts must be threaded full length and use heavy semifinished hexagonal nuts in accordance with ASME B18.2.2.
( d ) Alloy bolts or studs and nuts are to be threaded in accordance with ASME B1.1 (incorporated by reference; see § 56.01-2), Class 2A external threads, and Class 2B internal threads (8-thread series 8UN for one inch and larger).
( e ) (Reproduces 108.5.1.) Washers, when used under nuts, must be of forged or rolled material with steel washers being used under steel nuts and bronze washers under bronze nuts.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18843, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGD 77-140, 54 FR 40605, Oct. 2, 1989; USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58460, Sept. 29, 2000; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65176, Oct. 31, 2008]