alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: kyle.cawood@nau.edu [mailto:kyle.cawood@nau.edu] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:58 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kyle Cawood 

3283 S. Lindsey Loop 

Flagstaff, AZ 86001
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 7, 1995 (75), Para 75.5 Nuclear Proliferation Prevention]
[Page 826]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.75.5  nuclear proliferation prevention

  The Clerk then read the message from the President, as follows:

To the Congress of the United States:
  As required under section 601(a) of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act 
of 1978 (Public Law 95-242; 22 U.S.C. 3281(a)), I am transmitting a 
report on the activities of United States Government departments and 
agencies relating to the prevention of nuclear proliferation. It covers 
activities between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1994.
                                                   William J. Clinton.  
  The White House, June 6, 1995.

  By unanimous consent, the message, together with the accompanying 
papers, was referred to the Committee on International Relations.
```
EXHIBIT 99.1

 

 

Independent Auditors' Report

 

 

 

The Stockholders and Board of Directors of

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation (the "Company") as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

 

KPMG LLP

Burlington, Vermont

February 12, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 1 of 17

 

**VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION**
-----Original Message----- 

From: jeannie@magnocd.com [mailto:jeannie@magnocd.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:37 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jean Collins 

21 Ralph Vedder Road 

Saugerties, NY 12477
-----Original Message----- 

From: preppyhippie@calcentral.com [mailto:preppyhippie@calcentral.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:11 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Alan Savat 

526 Second Street 

Santa Cruz, CA 95060
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership - II (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the        “Report”), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General Partner and Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Partnership.

     

| November 15, 2009                                                             |  | /s/ Joseph M. Jayson           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--------------------------------|
|              Date |  | Joseph M. Jayson,         |
|                                                                               |  | Individual General Partner and |
|                                                                               |  | Principal Financial Officer    |
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT

(EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN)

 

 

	**AGREEMENT**, made this June 12, 1999, by and between Roger Henderson (hereinafter referred to as "Trustee"), and Chyron Corporation, a New York corporation with its principal offices at 5 Hub Drive, Melville, New York 11747.

	**WHEREAS**, the Trustee has agreed to provide his service to the Chyron Corp. Employee's Pension Plan, (the "Plan") provided that Chyron Corporation (the "Company") agrees to indemnify and hold it harmless for certain actions or inactions as Trustee; and

	**WHEREAS**, the Company has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the Trustee for certain actions or inactions as Trustee.

	**NOW, THEREFORE**, the parties agree as follows:

	1.	To the maximum extent permitted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and by other applicable Federal or state law, the Trustee shall not be liable for (either jointly or severally), and the Company shall indemnify the Trustee against, and agree to hold the Trustee harmless from, any and all liabilities and claims (including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses in defending against such liabilities and claims) against the Trustee arising from any action or inaction of the Trustee with respect to the Plan, unless such liability or expense results from grossly negligent or willful acts of commission or omission by the Trustee.  The foregoing indemnification also shall apply to all liabilities and claims against the Trustee arising from any breach of fiduciary responsibility by fiduciaries other than Trustee, unless the Trustee participates knowingly in such breach, or has actual knowledge of such breach and fails to take reasonable remedial action to remedy such breach.  The Trustee shall be entitled to collect on the Company's indemnity under this Agreement only from the Company and shall not be entitled to payment directly or indirectly from the Plan.

	2.	The Trustee shall give the Company prompt written notice of any asserted or potential claim by any party with respect to which the Trustee reasonably expects to assert a claim for indemnification.  The Company shall have the right to defend and control the nature of any action or defense to any such claim or demand which may be asserted against the Trustee for which the Trustee reasonably expects to assert a claim for indemnification.

	**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the parties hereto have set their hands and executed this Agreement, effective June 12, 1999.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2165 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                    

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2165

       To clarify the application of a certain transitional rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 1995

  Mr. Forbes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To clarify the application of a certain transitional rule.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TRANSITIONAL RULE.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 10631(c) of the Revenue 
Act of 1987 is amended by adding at the end the following flush 
sentence:
        ``For purposes of the preceding sentence, a bond shall be 
        treated as issued by the authority referred to in subparagraph 
        (A) if it is issued by any political subdivision of the State 
        referred to in subparagraph (A).''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to bonds issued after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 219.105 Railroad's duty to prevent violations. ( a ) A railroad may not, with actual knowledge, permit a regulated employee to go or remain on duty in regulated service in violation of the prohibitions of § 219.101 or § 219.102. As used in this section, the actual knowledge imputed to the railroad is limited to that of a railroad management employee (such as a supervisor deemed an “officer,” whether or not such person is a corporate officer) or a supervisory employee in the offending regulated employee's chain of command. A railroad management or supervisory employee has actual knowledge of a violation when he or she: ( 1 ) Personally observes a regulated employee use or possess alcohol or use drugs in violation of this subpart. It is not sufficient for actual knowledge if the supervisory or management employee merely observes the signs and symptoms of alcohol or drug use that require a reasonable suspicion test under § 219.301;
( 2 ) Receives information regarding a violation of this subpart from a previous employer of a regulated employee, in response to a background information request required by § 40.25 of this title; or
( 3 ) Receives a regulated employee's admission of prohibited alcohol possession or prohibited alcohol or drug use.
( b ) A railroad must exercise due diligence to assure compliance with §§ 219.101 and 219.102 by each regulated employee.
( c ) A railroad's alcohol and/or drug use education, prevention, identification, intervention, and rehabilitation programs and policies must be designed and implemented in such a way that they do not circumvent or otherwise undermine the requirements, standards, and policies of this part. Upon FRA's request, a railroad must make available for FRA review all documents, data, or other records related to such programs and policies.
( d ) Each year, a railroad's supervisors must conduct and record a number of “Rule G” employee observations at a minimum equal to twice the railroad's total number of regulated employees. Each “Rule G” observation must be made sufficiently close to an individual regulated employee to determine whether the employee is displaying signs and symptoms indicative of a violation of the prohibitions of this part.
[81 FR 37930, June 10, 2016]
-----Original Message----- 

From: avoidspammers-groups@yahoo.com [mailto:avoidspammersgroups@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:56 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Brad Kloth 

951 Homewood Ct 

Decatur, GA 30033
##### 



Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent AuditorsChampion Industries, Inc.
October 31, 2003

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No. 33-76790) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan of Champion
Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated December 31, 2003, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Champion
Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended October 31, 2003.

/s/Ernst & Young LLP

Charleston, West Virginia
January 23, 2004
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 27, 1995 (121), Para 121.20 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1455]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.121.20  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. MORAN:

       Page 7, line 16, strike ``employees'' and insert 
     ``representatives of employees, elected by a majority of 
     employees by secret ballot,''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

195

negative

Nays

228
```
#### § 93.01-1 General.

Each vessel must meet the applicable requirements in subchapter S of this chapter.

[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51008, Nov. 4, 1983]
-----Original Message----- 

From: mscaro@bellsouth.net [mailto:mscaro@bellsouth.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:03 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Carolyn McConnell 

1518 Stoneleigh Way 

Stone Mtn, GA 30088
# C_2004186EN.01000302.xml

| 21.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/3

---

Corrigendum to the opinion of the European Central Bank of 16 April 2004 at the request of the Council of the European Union on a proposal for a Council regulation concerning medals and tokens similar to euro coins (COM(2004) 39final)

(CON/2004/13)

(2004/C 186/04)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 134 of 12 May 2004
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 134 of 12 May 2004

On page 11, paragraph 3, third line:

for:

‘... of the euro symbol (IJ) on metallic objects ...’,

read:

‘... of the euro symbol (€) on metallic objects ...’.

---
§ 212.225 Apprentice operating practices inspector. ( a ) The apprentice operating practices inspector must be enrolled in a program of training prescribed by the Associate Administrator leading to qualification as an inspector. The apprentice inspector may not participate in investigative and surveillance activities, except as an assistant to a qualified State or FRA inspector while accompanying that qualified inspector.
( b ) An apprentice operating practices inspector shall demonstrate basic knowledge of railroad operating practices, railroad operating rules and general duties of railroad employees prior to being enrolled in the program.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending February 5, 2011

|Filer                           | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                
|------------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc. | * 3A1         | First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc., Farmington, Connecticut to acquire 100% of the outstanding capital stock of Farmington Bank, Farmington, Connecticut, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act, in connection with the conversion of the holding company from mutual to stock form. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                      | Not available
|Federal Register:               | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# EUR-Lex - 52003XC0523(02) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52003XC0523(02)

**Lists published under Article 30 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1291/2000 of 9 June 2000 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences and advance fixing certificates for agricultural products **

*
Official Journal C 121 , 23/05/2003 P. 0009 - 0021 *

Lists published under Article 30 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1291/2000 of 9 June 2000 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences and advance fixing certificates for agricultural products

(2003/C 121/04)

(These lists replace those published in the Official Journal of the European Communities No C 328 of 1 November 1996, page 2)

LIST 1

Agencies responsible for issuing import licences

>TABLE>

LIST 2

Agencies responsible for issuing export licences or advance fixing certificates

>TABLE>

LIST 3

Agencies responsible for issuing extracts from import and export licences and advance fixing certificates

>TABLE>

LIST 4

Agencies responsible for collecting duties and levies and for paying refunds on agricultural products

I. COLLECTION OF DUTIES AND LEVIES

>TABLE>

II. PAYMENT OF EXPORT REFUNDS

>TABLE>

ANNEX

LIST OF FRENCH CUSTOMS' REGIONAL REVENUE OFFICES

>TABLE>
#### § 209.133 Referral for prosecution.

If an inspector, including a certified state inspector under part 212 of this chapter, or another employee of FRA becomes aware of a possible knowing violation of 49 U.S.C. 5104(b) or a willful or reckless violation of the Federal hazardous materials transportation law or a regulation issued under those laws for which FRA exercises enforcement responsibility, he or she shall report it to the Chief Counsel. If evidence exists tending to establish a prima facie case, and if it appears that assessment of a civil penalty would not be an adequate deterrent to future violations, the Chief Counsel refers the report to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution of the offender.

[61 FR 38647, July 25, 1996, as amended at 71 FR 77295, Dec. 26, 2006]
§ 213.332 Combined track alinement and surface deviations. ( a ) This section applies to any curved track where operations are conducted at a qualified cant deficiency, Eu, greater than 5 inches, and to all Class 9 track, either curved or tangent.
( b ) For the conditions defined in paragraph (a) of this section, the combination of alinement and surface deviations for the same chord length on the outside rail in a curve and on any of the two rails of a tangent section, as measured by a TGMS, shall comply with the following formula:
Where— Am = measured alinement deviation from uniformity (outward is positive, inward is negative). AL = allowable alinement limit as per § 213.327(c) (always positive) for the class of track. Sm = measured profile deviation from uniformity (down is positive, up is negative). SL = allowable profile limit as per § 213.331(a) and § 213.331(b) (always positive) for the class of track.
[78 FR 16107, Mar. 13, 2013]