alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership II for
the quarter ended June 30, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                 106,830
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          225,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                           200,108
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             0
<PP&E>                                              10,503,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                       5,969,891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       4,965,781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        0
<BONDS>                                              6,458,172
<COMMON>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         4,965,781
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       581,480
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          528,898
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     174,875
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (83,359)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (83,359)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.1 - Second Amendment


    EXHIBIT
      4.1

     

    SECOND
      AMENDMENT

    TO
      THE

    AMARIN
      CORPORATION PLC

    2002
      STOCK OPTION PLAN

     

    WHEREAS,
      Amarin
      Corporation plc, an English company (the “Company”), has established and
      maintains the Amarin Corporation plc 2002 Stock Option Plan, effective as of
      January 1, 2002 (as amended by Amendment No. 1 in November 2003, the
“Plan”), which authorizes the grant of stock options to certain employees and
      non-employees of the Company; and

     

    WHEREAS,
      the
      Company has previously reserved 4,000,000 Ordinary Shares, par value 5 pence
      each (“Shares”), for issuance under the Plan;

     

    WHEREAS,
      Section
      7 of the Plan reserves to the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”)
      the right to amend the Plan at any time;

     

    WHEREAS,
      the Plan
      has stated as one of its purposes the ability to award “incentive stock options”
that meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
      as amended (the “Code”), and Section 422 of the Code requires such an increase
      in Shares available for issuance to be approved by the Company’s
      shareholders;

     

    WHEREAS,
      the
      Board and the Company’s shareholders (by majority vote on July 25, 2003)
      approved an increase in the number of Shares available for grant under the
      Plan
      by 2,000,000 Shares up to an aggregate of 4,000,000 Shares; and

     

    WHEREAS,
      the
      Board and the Company’s shareholders (by majority vote on July 25, 2005)
      approved a further increase in the number of Shares available for grant under
      the Plan by an additional 4,000,000 Shares for an aggregate of 8,000,000
      Shares.

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that
      the
      first sentence of Section 4.1(a) of the Plan is hereby amended, effective as
      of
      July 25, 2005, to read as follows:

     

    “Subject
      to adjustment as provided in Section 4(c) of the Plan, the Plan may issue up
      to
      8 million Shares under all Awards (the “Plan Limit”).”

     

    *  * 
*

     

    IN
      WITNESS HEREOF, the
      Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized officer
      effective as of July 25, 2005.

     

    AMARIN
      CORPORATION PLC

     

    By: /s/
      Jonathan S. Lamb

     

    Name: /s/
      Jonathan S. Lamb

     

    Its: General
      Counsel and Company Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF PAULSON CAPITAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY AS OF MARCH
31, 1998 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS IN THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                          88
<RECEIVABLES>                                                3,237
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                              0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                            0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                         12,166
<PP&E>                                                         230
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              16,602
<SHORT-TERM>                                                   100
<PAYABLES>                                                   2,428
<REPOS-SOLD>                                                     0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                              0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                             192
<LONG-TERM>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                       792
<OTHER-SE>                                                  13,090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                16,602
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                              348
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                                             1
<COMMISSIONS>                                                2,717
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                                  232
<FEE-REVENUE>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               2
<COMPENSATION>                                               2,422
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                289
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                                     289
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   174
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  .04
        

</TABLE>
From: pcrawford5@cox.net [mailto:pcrawford5@cox.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:00 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Phyllis Crawford 

4115 W Dailey St 

Phoenix, AZ 85053
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.381 Service lines: Excess flow valve performance standards. ( a ) Excess flow valves (EFVs) to be used on service lines that operate continuously throughout the year at a pressure not less than 10 p.s.i. (69 kPa) gage must be manufactured and tested by the manufacturer according to an industry specification, or the manufacturer's written specification, to ensure that each valve will: ( 1 ) Function properly up to the maximum operating pressure at which the valve is rated;
( 2 ) Function properly at all temperatures reasonably expected in the operating environment of the service line;
( 3 ) At 10 p.s.i. (69 kPa) gage: ( i ) Close at, or not more than 50 percent above, the rated closure flow rate specified by the manufacturer; and
( ii ) Upon closure, reduce gas flow— ( A ) For an excess flow valve designed to allow pressure to equalize across the valve, to no more than 5 percent of the manufacturer's specified closure flow rate, up to a maximum of 20 cubic feet per hour (0.57 cubic meters per hour); or
( B ) For an excess flow valve designed to prevent equalization of pressure across the valve, to no more than 0.4 cubic feet per hour (.01 cubic meters per hour); and
( 4 ) Not close when the pressure is less than the manufacturer's minimum specified operating pressure and the flow rate is below the manufacturer's minimum specified closure flow rate.
( b ) An excess flow valve must meet the applicable requirements of Subparts B and D of this part.
( c ) An operator must mark or otherwise identify the presence of an excess flow valve in the service line.
( d ) An operator shall locate an excess flow valve as near as practical to the fitting connecting the service line to its source of gas supply.
( e ) An operator should not install an excess flow valve on a service line where the operator has prior experience with contaminants in the gas stream, where these contaminants could be expected to cause the excess flow valve to malfunction or where the excess flow valve would interfere with necessary operation and maintenance activities on the service, such as blowing liquids from the line.
[Amdt. 192-79, 61 FR 31459, June 20, 1996, as amended by Amdt. 192-80, 62 FR 2619, Jan. 17, 1997; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37504, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-121, 81 FR 71001, Oct. 14, 2016]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2118

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction to

individuals for amounts paid for public school bus service.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26, 1995

Ms. LOFGREN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a

deduction to individuals for amounts paid for public

school bus service.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FOR AMOUNTS PAID FOR PUBLIC

4 SCHOOL BUS SERVICE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part VII of subchapter B of chap6 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended

7 by redesignating section 220 as section 221 and by insert8 ing after section 219 the following new section:
2

•HR 2118 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 220. PUBLIC SCHOOL BUS SERVICE.

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There shall be allowed as a de3 duction an amount equal to the expenses paid during the

4 taxable year for public school bus service for any depend5 ent (as defined in section 152), but only if—

6 ‘‘(1) such expenses are a separately stated

7 charge, and

8 ‘‘(2) such expenses are for service provided dur9 ing the service period.

10 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section—

11 ‘‘(1) PUBLIC SCHOOL BUS SERVICE.—The term

12 ‘public school bus service’ means transportation by

13 a school bus of students of a public school.

14 ‘‘(2) SCHOOL.—The term ‘school’ means an ele15 mentary or secondary educational organization de16 scribed in section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii).

17 ‘‘(3) SCHOOL BUS.—The term ‘school bus’ has

18 the meaning given such term by section

19 4221(d)(7)(C).

20 ‘‘(4) SERVICE PERIOD.—The term ‘service pe21 riod’ means the taxable year and the 6-month period

22 beginning at the close of the taxable year.’’

23 (b) ALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION WHETHER OR NOT

24 TAXPAYER ITEMIZES OTHER DEDUCTIONS.—Subsection

25 (a) of section 62 of such Code (relating to adjusted gross
3

•HR 2118 IH

1 income defined) is amended by inserting after paragraph

2 (15) the following new paragraph:

3 ‘‘(16) PUBLIC SCHOOL BUS SERVICE.—The de4 duction allowed by section 220.’’

5 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

6 for part VII of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code

7 is amended by striking the item relating to section 220

8 and inserting the following new items:

‘‘Sec. 220. Public school bus service.

‘‘Sec. 221. Cross reference.’’

9 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

10 this section shall apply to amounts paid in taxable years

11 ending after the date of the enactment of this Act for serv12 ice provided after August 15, 1995.

Æ
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 31, 1995 (105), Para 105.6 Message from the Senate]
[Page 1222]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.105.6  message from the senate

  A message from the Senate by Mr. Lundregan, one of its clerks, 
announced that the Senate had passed with amendments in which the 
concurrence of the House is requested, a bill of the House of the 
following title:

       H.R. 1817. An Act making appropriations for military 
     construction, family housing, and base realignment and 
     closure for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year 
     ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes.

  The message also announced that the Senate insists upon its amendments 
to the bill (H.R. 1817) ``An Act making appropriations for military 
construction, family housing, and base realignment and closure for the 
Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and 
for other purposes,'' requests a conference with the House on the 
disagreeing votes of the two Houses thereon, and appoints Mr. Burns, Mr. 
Stevens, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Gregg, Mr. Reid, Mr. Inouye, and Mr. Byrd, to 
be the conferees on the part of the Senate.
```
#### §§ 1014.171-1014.999 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 107 appear at 67 FR 61011, Sept. 27, 2002, 70 FR 56089, Sept. 23, 2005, and 70 FR 73159, Dec. 9, 2005.

§ 107.319 Request for a hearing. ( a ) In responding to a notice of probable violation under § 107.311, the respondent may request a formal administrative hearing on the record before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) obtained by the Office of the Chief Counsel.
( b ) A request for a hearing under paragraph (a) of this section must: ( 1 ) State the name and address of the respondent and of the person submitting the request if different from the respondent;
( 2 ) State which allegations of violations, if any, are admitted; and
( 3 ) State generally the issues to be raised by the respondent at the hearing. Issues not raised in the request are not barred from presentation at the hearing; and
( 4 ) Be addressed to the official who issued the notice.
( c ) After a request for a hearing that complies with the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, the Chief Counsel obtains an ALJ to preside over the hearing and notifies the respondent of this fact. Upon assignment of an ALJ, further matters in the proceeding generally are conducted by and through the ALJ, except that the Chief Counsel and respondent may compromise or settle the case under § 107.327 of this subpart without order of the ALJ or voluntarily dismiss the case under Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure without order of the ALJ; in the event of such a compromise, settlement or dismissal, the Chief Counsel expeditiously will notify the ALJ thereof.
( d ) At any time after requesting a formal administrative hearing but prior to the issuance of a decision and final order by the ALJ, the respondent may withdraw such request in writing, thereby terminating the jurisdication of the ALJ in the case. Such a withdrawal constitutes an irrevocable waiver of respondent's right to such a hearing on the facts, allegations, and proposed sanction presented in the notice of probable violation to which the request for hearing relates.
[Amdt. 107-11, 48 FR 2651, Jan. 20, 1983, as amended at 48 FR 17094, Apr. 21, 1983; Amdt. 107-19, 54 FR 22899, May 30, 1989]
-----Original Message----- 

From: j_hart_99@yahoo.com [mailto:j_hart_99@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:58 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jordana H. 

2750 N. Hampden 

Chicago, IL 60614
#### Algernon S. Sullivan, *Public Administrator, etc., Respondent, v.*Isaiah C. Babcock and others, *Appellants.*

Judgment affirmed on opinion of

Larremobe, J.,

in the court below, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         1493966
<SECURITIES>                                   7443948
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9006796
<PP&E>                                         1955358
<DEPRECIATION>                                  785537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                11005414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            43482
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        376688
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    10515404
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  11005414
<SALES>                                         901835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2008260
<CGS>                                           359090
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1558894
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1118049
<INCOME-TAX>                                    340211
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             777838
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    777838
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.15


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION

Theundersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

(1) Theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the periodended April 30 2006, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

Date: June 14, 2006
|   | /s/ Joseph C. Christenson                                       |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Joseph C. Christenson                                           |
|   | President, Chief  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Gregory S. Lang, Chief Executive Officer of Integrated
Device Technology, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, certify to my knowledge that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 7, 2007

/s/ Gregory S. LangGregory S. LangChief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
-----Original Message----- 

From: valerie.schiafone3@comcast.net 

[mailto:valerie.schiafone3@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:28 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

valerie schiafone 

52 branchport av 

long branch, NJ 07740
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Clinger, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Clinger*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 10.]

(No. 98-874

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided November 25, 1998.)

*Robert A. Fry,*Hancock County Prosecuting' Attorney, and *Mark C. Miller,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

*David H. Bodiker,*Ohio Public Defender, and *Robert L. Lane,*Chief Appellate Counsel, for appellee.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The cause is remanded to the trial court to conduct a sexual predator classification hearing pursuant to R.C. 2950.09(C)(2).

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E.'Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.