alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2155 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2155

To amend title 38, United States Code, to restrict payment, in the case 
 of incarcerated veterans, of the clothing allowance otherwise payable 
   to certain disabled veterans and to create for pension purposes a 
presumption of permanent and total disability for veterans over age 65 
                  who are patients in a nursing home.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 1995

Mr. Stump (for himself and Mr. Montgomery) (both by request) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to restrict payment, in the case 
 of incarcerated veterans, of the clothing allowance otherwise payable 
   to certain disabled veterans and to create for pension purposes a 
presumption of permanent and total disability for veterans over age 65 
                  who are patients in a nursing home.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans' Benefits Reform Act of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FOR INCARCERATED VETERANS.

    (a) Pro Rata Reduction.--Chapter 53 of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting after section 5313 the following new 
section:
``Sec. 5313A. Limitation on payment of clothing allowance to 
              incarcerated veterans
    ``In the case of a veteran who is incarcerated in a Federal, State, 
or local penal institution for a period in excess of 60 days and who is 
furnished clothing without charge by the institution, the amount of an 
annual clothing allowance payable to such veteran under section 1162 of 
this title shall be reduced on a pro rata basis for each day on which 
the veteran was so incarcerated during the 12-month period preceding 
the date on which payment of the allowance would be due. This section 
shall be carried out under regulations prescribed by the Secretary.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
5313 the following new item:

``5313A. Limitation on payment of clothing allowance to incarcerated 
                            veterans.''.
SEC. 3. PRESUMPTION OF PERMANENT AND TOTAL DISABILITY FOR VETERANS OVER 
              AGE 65 WHO ARE NURSING HOME PATIENTS.

    Section 1502(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``is 65 years of age or older and a patient in a nursing home 
or, regardless of age,'' after ``such a person''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 99-11275

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-11275

Summary Calendar

 

GREGORY C. NIEMANN,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

WALTER S. SMITH, JR., U.S. District Judge; JOHN PHINIZY,

Assistant U.S. Attorney; GEORGE MAYBEN, Department of Public

Safety Narcotics Investigator; HOWARD WESTMORELAND, Hamilton

County Sheriff’s Department, Investigator; JEFFREY BRZOZOWSKI,

ATF agent; RONALD HUDSON MOODY, Attorney, STAN SCHWIEGER,

Attorney,

 Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:99-CV-994-L

--------------------

June 27, 2000

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gregory C. Niemann, federal prisoner # 264-68-080, appeals the

dismissal of his suit pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named

Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The

district court did not err when it dismissed Niemann’s claims 

against Judge Walter Smith and Assistant United States Attorney

John Phinizy because they are absolutely immune from liability.

Boyd v. Biggers, 31 F.3d 279, 284 (5th Cir. 1994); 28 U.S.C. 
No. 99-11275

-2-

§ 1915A. Pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994),

Niemann’s claims against the remaining defendants have not accrued.

Stephenson v. Reno, 28 F.3d 26, 27-28 (5th Cir. 1994) Accordingly,

the district court did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed

those claims as frivolous. § 1915A.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Honorable Vi.I;.

JlcClain Criminal Dietriot Attorney Georgetown, Texae Dear Sir:

WI have reoeived wo **quote** in part as follow fng questions 

### eleoted aa a recent date whioh
the f6lloruld ltk6 to hare
sentenoe diequalify a any aleotfon,lshether e or National sleotlon?~.n

2 of Artiola XVI 02 the Conetitutian of Texas prOVideI a8 folloy6~1

*Laws shall be made 66 sxolude fro&aoffloe, BerVhg On jUrtf#sF Nid froI$ $&a right Of mffrags; thoee who lMy haye besa or ahall hemafter bh aonricted or robberp; perjury, fOr&tlry, or other high ar3qr. . i*

### i3oawrUoiL I. 

### XoOlmln,Paw 8.,I,.

;, p,norableVi.K. NoClaln, Paeo 3

*what does the oourt mean by thlm language? clearly that If tha Su6penQeQ S8DtwmI &r Qefaat6 or nulllfle6 or oonillat6 with S*otlon E of AHA010 XVI of the constitution, it WQuld be void. ~1s oonillot, 

### l

ooording to the court, would result If a porron rho 18 the rmlplent of a lu6- ponded sentonoa rorildnot 6tifer the dirabillty pronounood **by** this provision **of the**  **Co66titUti~. III**  other **words, aa**  **applied to**  

### Seotlon **E of**  **Utl** ale 16 of ths Con6tltutlon, if besawo of anQ undrr the 

### auspendmd rontenoa

law a person oould hold office, 8erv6 on jurI66, and vote, notmithstandinghl6 having been adjudged 

### gufltrof the orlmosmsntlonsd, broausa hi6 6rnteabo had 

### beon su6pOlldO&,TiOUbi not the eff*Ot Of th 6U6QOnQbQ rehtrnor law be to 

### QUoat the purporr.o$ tha Oon6tltution? * i .Wiwoar, if the mrd *eonvlbt6di In Section 2 of Artfale 16 of the Con6tltutlon be held to

### rae~~tbm l



### oertaimmnt ~anQpublle6tion of guilt, rather than a final **aodrletloa,** the 

### dirabilltle6progounP66 **by** th6 Coartltutlon wrould be suffered and the 

### l plrlt and purpose of 'SeotionZ of 

### Artiolo

la 16 

### ~aot

violated by the s~6pendoQ '. sentenoe lan.m
me ~MUOS in701~0d ~II pour queri06 WC&S 

### itin 1~. ~lrou8ml, and

l uthorltle6 thereon wore ~,urtod, in opin- 

### :ba l?o.

O-8698,

uM we.oaolo’ao 

### a aoptofsaid 

### oplhlonfor tdurcon6IUeratlon.

In vlon of the above 

### olted oon6,tltutlonal an4 otatntory&ovlsions aad ~thapriao~pler aahuaiwd ia Opinion No. be698, w4 are ooastr~aed to hold that a pw6Oa who 16 oon

### dOted ormurder anil: given a 

## rira year 

### l unpdl4od 88ntenoe FhiohI6 #till 

### in foroem4 Urud 

### Im notauaflfIa4 either TVhold th. ofilos of tN6tWJ of a to exercisethe right of 6tifrqw. 0aumQa &&001 dirtriot or
Very truly your6
-----Original Message----- 

From: wndrfltray@gmail.com [mailto:wndrfltray@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 7:21 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Tracey Cooper 

40 Witman Drive 

Breinigsville, PA 18031
§ 213.303 Responsibility for compliance. ( a ) Any owner of track to which this subpart applies who knows or has notice that the track does not comply with the requirements of this subpart, shall— ( 1 ) Bring the track into compliance; or
( 2 ) Halt operations over that track.
( b ) If an owner of track to which this subpart applies assigns responsibility for the track to another person (by lease or otherwise), notification of the assignment shall be provided to the appropriate FRA Regional Office at least 30 days in advance of the assignment. The notification may be made by any party to that assignment, but shall be in writing and include the following— ( 1 ) The name and address of the track owner;
( 2 ) The name and address of the person to whom responsibility is assigned (assignee);
( 3 ) A statement of the exact relationship between the track owner and the assignee;
( 4 ) A precise identification of the track;
( 5 ) A statement as to the competence and ability of the assignee to carry out the duties of the track owner under this subpart;
( 6 ) A statement signed by the assignee acknowledging the assignment to that person of responsibility for purposes of compliance with this subpart.
( c ) The Administrator may hold the track owner or the assignee or both responsible for compliance with this subpart and subject to the penalties under § 213.15.
( d ) When any person, including a contractor for a railroad or track owner, performs any function required by this part, that person is required to perform that function in accordance with this part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          53,822
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,122
<INVENTORY>                                     26,556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,158
<PP&E>                                         415,275
<DEPRECIATION>                                  76,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 731,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,455
<BONDS>                                        584,168
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           107
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   731,442
<SALES>                                        384,688
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               384,688
<CGS>                                          301,793
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  301,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,823
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,694)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,677)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,017)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,017)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.22)
        

</TABLE>
6-1 September 2008

6.0 Public Coordination 

6.1 Public Participation and Scoping 

NEPA requires full disclosure and open public participation in the federal decision making process, including 

those projects proposed by non-federal proponents that require federal approval. There are two key points 

during the development of an EA that the general public is invited to participate in the process: 1) during the 

scoping period and 2) during the 30-day review period of the EA. 

The BLM published a scoping notice on their website, issued a press release in three local newspapers, and 

mailed postcards to 700 parties of interest announcing the Project and comment period from February 22 

through March 14, 2008. Additionally, an interagency meeting was held on February 27, 2008, in Craig, 

Colorado, for key federal and state agencies to comment on the provide input regarding potential concerns 

along the proposed pipeline route that needed to be addressed in the EA. Issues and concerns identified 

during the scoping period are provided in more detail in Section 1.7. 

6.2 Tribes, Individuals, Organizations, or Agencies Consulted 

The following tribes, agencies, and organizations/individuals were contacted during the scoping process. 

Tribes

Eastern Shoshone 

Northern Arapaho 

Northern Ute 

Shoshone Bannock 

Southern Ute 

Ute Mountain Ute 

Federal Agencies

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 

Army Corps of Engineers 

Natural Resources Conservation Service 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 

State Agencies 

Colorado Department of Wildlife 

Colorado State Historic Preservation Office 

Colorado State Land Board 

Wyoming Game and Fish Department 

Wyoming State Historic Preservation Office 

Local Agencies 

Sweetwater County Planning and Zoning 

Organizations 

Center for Native Ecosystems 

Colorado Natural Heritage Program 

Wyoming Natural Diversity Database
-----Original Message----- 

From: C.SPIER@att.NET [mailto:C.SPIER@att.NET] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:41 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

carolyn spier 

po box 1029 

weimar, CA 95736
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 8, 1995 (112), Para 112.4 Base Closure Disapproval]
[Pages 1319-1320]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.112.4  base closure disapproval

  Mr. SPENCE, by unanimous consent, by direction of the Committee on 
National Security and pursuant to section 2908 of Public Law 101-510, 
the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union was 
discharged from consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 102) 
disapproving the recommendations of the Defense Base Closure and 
Realignment Commission, and the joint resolution was considered in the 
House.
  When said joint resolution was considered and read twice.
  After debate,
  Pursuant to section 2908 of the Base Closure and Realignment 
Commission Act of 1990, the question on passage was put.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House pass said joint resolution?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. KOLBE, announced that the nays had it.
  Mr. TEJEDA objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  A quorum not being present,
  The roll was called under clause 4, rule XV, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

[[Page 1320]]

Yeas

75

When there appeared

Nays

343
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, July 18, 1995 (96), Para 96.5 Communications]
[Pages 1140-1141]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.96.5  communications

  Executive and other communications, pursuant to clause 2, rule XXIV, 
were referred as follows:

[[Page 1141]]

       1219. A letter from the Acting Director, Defense Security 
     Assistance Agency, transmitting the Department of the Air 
     Force's proposed lease of defense articles to the Taipei 
     economic and cultural representative in the United States 
     [TECRO] (Transmittal No. 29-95), pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 
     2796a(a); to the Committee on International Relations.
       1220. A letter from the Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty 
     Affairs, Department of State, transmitting copies of 
     international agreements, other than treaties, entered into 
     by the United States, pursuant to 1 U.S.C. 112b(a); to the 
     Committee on International Relations.
       1221. A letter from the Auditor, District of Columbia, 
     transmitting a copy of a report entitled, ``Review of the 
     Award and Administration of Parking Ticket Processing and 
     Delinquent Ticket Collection Services Contracts,'' pursuant 
     to D.C. Code, section 47-117(d); to the Committee on 
     Government Reform and Oversight.
       1222. A letter from the Deputy Director for Operations and 
     Benefits, District of Columbia Retirement Board, transmitting 
     the financial disclosure statement of a board member, 
     pursuant to D.C. Code, section 1-732 and 1-734(a)(1)(A); to 
     the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight.
       1223. A letter from the Chairman, Federal Election 
     Commission, transmitting a copy of a report entitled, 
     ``Impact of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 on 
     the Administration of Elections for Federal Office, 1993-
     1994,'' pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1973gg-7; to the Committee on 
     House Oversight.
       1224. A letter from the Deputy Associate Director for 
     Compliance, Department of the Interior, transmitting 
     notification of proposed refunds of excess royalty payments 
     in OCS areas, pursuant to 43 U.S.C. 1339(b); to the Committee 
     on Resources.
       1225. A letter from the Deputy Associate Director for 
     Compliance, Department of the Interior, transmitting 
     notification of proposed refunds of excess royalty payments 
     in OCS areas, pursuant to 43 U.S.C. 1339(b); to the Committee 
     on Resources.
       1226. A letter from the Deputy Associate Director for 
     Compliance, Department of the Interior, transmitting 
     notification of proposed refunds of excess royalty payments 
     in OCS areas, pursuant to 43 U.S.C. 1339(b); to the Committee 
     on Resources.
       1227. A letter from the Acting Assistant Secretary for 
     Territorial and International Affairs, Department of the 
     Interior, transmitting a draft of proposed legislation 
     entitled, ``Pacific Insular Fisheries Empow- erment Act of 
     1995''; to the Committee on Resources.
```
----

| EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002             In connection with the Annual Report of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Pamela J. Keefe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:             (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and             (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Pamela J. Keefe          Pamela J. KeefeChief Financial OfficerMarch 15, 2010 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Central Vermont Public Service Corporation ("CVPS") and will be retained by CVPS and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 192

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

#### § 192.287 Plastic pipe: Inspection of joints.

No person may carry out the inspection of joints in plastic pipes required by §§ 192.273(c) and 192.285(b) unless that person has been qualified by appropriate training or experience in evaluating the acceptability of plastic pipe joints made under the applicable joining procedure.

[Amdt. 192-34, 44 FR 42974, July 23, 1979]
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viropro Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB /A
 for the period ending February 28, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Lee, acting as Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Richard Lee

_______________________________

Richard Lee, Sole Director and Officer

(acts as Chief  Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Date:   May 10
, 2005.
EXHIBIT 21.1


                   SUBSIDIARIES OF Iwerks Entertainment, Inc.



Cinetropolis, Inc., a California corporation

Iwerks Touring Technologies, Inc. (previously Portable Turbo Tour, Inc.), a
        California corporation

Iwerks Attractions & Technologies, Inc. (previously Iwerks Entertainment,
        Inc.), a California corporation

Omni Films International, Inc., a Delaware corporation

OFI Technology, Inc., a Florida corporation

Discovery Theaters San Francisco Corp., a California corporation

Cinetropolis Management, Inc., a California corporation

Iwerks Projectors Marketing, Inc., a California corporation

Iwerks Linear Loop Projectors, Inc., a California corporation

Iwerks Production Company, a California corporation

Iwerks Story Development Company, a California corporation