alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.2

AGREEMENT AMENDING AND EXTENDING TERM OF LEASE

THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the 24th day of May 2002, between EARL H.
SEIEBERT AND ELAINE D. SEIBERT, husband and wife (collectively Landlord) and
SMITH & BUTTERFIELD CO., INC., an Indiana corporation, (Tenant).

RECITALS

On June 1, 1972, the parties hereto entered into a certain Lease Agreement
covering the premises commonly known as 113, 115 and 117 E. Third Street in
Owensboro; Kentucky; the extended term of which expires on May 30; 2002.

Landlord and Tenant desire to further extend the term of the aforesaid Lease
Agreement of June 1, 1972, and to modify and amend certain terms and provisions
thereof.

NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE PREMISES, the parties hereto agree as
follows:

1.     Extension of Term -The term of the aforesaid Lease Agreement of June 1,
1972, as heretofore extended, be, and the same is, hereby extended for an
additional term of five (5) years commencing on the 1st day of June, 2002, and
ending at midnight on May 31 2007. Tenant shall have and is hereby granted two
(2) options to extend the term of this Lease for a period of five (5) years
each commencing June 1, 2007. Written notice of such election will be given to
the Landlord not less than 30 days prior to the expiration of this lease.

2.     RENT-The Net Total Rental payable by Tenant to Landlord during the
extended term provided for herein shall be the sum of Seventy-Two Thousand
Dollars ($72,000) payable in equal monthly installments of One Thousand Two
Hundred Dollars ($1,200.00), in advance, on the first (1st) day of each
calendar month during the extended term.

3.     Other Terms and Provisions -Except as expressly otherwise provided herein,
all terms; provisions; conditions and obligations applicable to the aforesaid
Lease Agreement of June 1, 1972, as heretofore extended, shall extend and apply
for and during the additional extended term. In case said options are
exercised, the same terms, conditions, covenants and provisions of this Lease
applicable to the original ten (10) year term shall apply to the extended term,
including without limitation the rent.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the day and
year first above written.

|                                         |  |                              
|---------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|/s/ Earl H. Seibert                      |  | EARL H. SEIBERT              
|                                        
|/s/ Elaine D. Seibert                    |  | ELAINE D. SEIBERT Landlord 
|                                        
|BY:/s/ James D. Butterfield              |  | SMITH & BUTTERFIELD CO., INC.
|                                        
|James D. Butterfield, President Tenant
-----Original Message----- 

From: dianesherbgarden@aol.com [mailto:dianesherbgarden@aol.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 1:05 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Diane Panella 

1145 Cambria Way 

Encinitas, CA 92024
-----Original Message----- 

From: janienalini@yahoo.com [mailto:janienalini@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:51 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

jane wilson 

1972 zehndner ave. 

arcatac, CA 95521
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
EnergyNorth, Inc. condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 1998, and
condensed consolidated statement of income and statement of cash flows for the
nine months ended June 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      104,099<F1>
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      7,773<F2>
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          33,161
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        11,744
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,777
<COMMON>                                         3,316
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       32,410
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             19,082
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  54,808
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            45,731
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               1,505
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    1,012
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  53,721
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  156,777
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       93,422
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             4,821
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      77,965
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      82,786
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         10,636
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,096
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  11,732
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         3,512
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,220
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    8,220
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         3,189
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,600<F3>
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          15,979
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $2.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Net of accumulated depreciation of $50,819
<F2>Net of accumulated depreciation of $10,165
<F3>$3,600 represents the forecasted annual interest on bonds for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 1998.  Actual interest on bonds for the nine months
ended June 30, 1998, was $2,701.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2061

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 18, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 1550 Dewey

Avenue, Baker City, Oregon, as the ‘‘David J. Wheeler

Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2061 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building located at 1550 Dewey Avenue,

3 Baker City, Oregon, shall be known and designated as the

4 ‘‘David J. Wheeler Federal Building’’.

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

8 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

9 a reference to the ‘‘David J. Wheeler Federal Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 18

(legislative day, December 15), 1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, August 3, 1995 (108), Para 108.31 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1257]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.108.31  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. SPENCE: Committee on National Security. H.R. 1350. A 
     bill to amend the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 to revitalize the 
     United States-flag merchant marine, and for other purposes; 
     with an amendment (Rept. No. 104-229). Referred to the 
     Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union.
```
§ 214.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to prevent accidents and casualties to employees involved in certain railroad inspection, maintenance and construction activities.
( b ) This part prescribes minimum Federal safety standards for the railroad workplace safety subjects addressed herein. This part does not restrict a railroad or railroad contractor from adopting and enforcing additional or more stringent requirements not inconsistent with this part.
# Appendix 2
Document has been coded “B” May be requested under the Freedom of 

Information Act http:// www.epa.gov/pesticides/foia but access is 

restricted to entities not engaged in the production sale or distribution 

of pesticides outside the United States
From: bvoevo@verizon.net [mailto:bvoevo@verizon.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 6:22 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

WILLIAM C VAN OST 

45 Dwight Pl #2 

ENGLEWOOD,, NJ 07631
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 27, 1995 (121), Para 121.32 International Space Station]
[Page 1458]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.121.32  international space station

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaHOOD, pursuant to House Resolution 228 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the consideration of the bill 
(H.R. 1601) to authorize appropriations to the National Aeronautics and 
space Administration to develop, assemble, and operate the international 
Space Station.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaHOOD, by unanimous consent, designated 
Mr. HOBSON as Chairman of the Committee of the Whole; and after some 
time spent therein,
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SALMON, assumed the Chair.
  When Mr. HOBSON, Chairman, reported that the Committee, having had 
under consideration said bill, had come to no resolution thereon.
```
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00329-CV

Span Investment Group LLC

v.

Cameron Appraisal District

On Appeal from the

357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-DCL-06696-E

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 22, 2020
#### Christianna Harrison, *Appellant, v.*The Brooklyn, Bath and Coney Island Railroad Company, *Respondent*.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event; reference vacated. Opinion by

Cullen, J.
-----Original Message----- 

From: fredhb@comcast.net [mailto:fredhb@comcast.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 12:00 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Fred Becker 

18210 47th Place NE 

Lake Forest Park, WA 98155
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,654,299
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,423,247
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    905,248
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,078,843
<PP&E>                                       2,159,320
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,526,693
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,403,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          504,640
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       239,439
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,481,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,403,415
<SALES>                                      3,135,003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,135,003
<CGS>                                        1,302,565
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,600,952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                556,880
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   556,880
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.215
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.213
        

</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 13, 1995 (114), Para 114.25 Subpoena]
[Page 1341]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.114.25  subpoena

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaHOOD, laid before the House a 
communication, which was read as follows:

                                              Office of the Clerk,

                                U.S. House of Representatives,

                               Washington, DC, September 12, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     Speaker, House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Speaker: This is to notify you pursuant to Rule L 
     (50) of the Rules of the House I have been served with a 
     subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the 
     Central District of California.
       The General Counsel has determined that compliance with the 
     subpoena is not inconsistent with the privileges and 
     precedents of the House.
       With warm regards,
           Sincerely,
                                                   Robin H. Carle,
                                  Clerk, House of Representatives.
  And then,
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending March 31, 2012

|Filer                    | Filing Type                      | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------ | -------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|GEORGETOWN BANCORP, MHC  | * SLHC Formation* MHC Conversion | Georgetown Bancorp, MHC, Georgetown, Massachusetts proposes to convert to stock form and merge with Georgetown Bancorp, Inc., Georgetown, Massachusetts, which proposes to become a savings and loan holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Georgetown Savings Bank, Georgetown, Massachusetts. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:04/09/2012
|Newspaper:               | Not available                   
|Federal Register:        | 04/09/2012                      
|MEETINGHOUSE BANCORP INC | * 3A1                            | Meetinghouse Bancorp, Inc., Dorchester, Massachusetts to acquire 100% of the outstanding capital stock of Meetinghouse Bank, Dorchester, Massachusetts, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act, in connection with the conversion of the bank from mutual to stock form.                         | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:04/13/2012
|Newspaper:               | Not available                   
|Federal Register:        | 04/13/2012                      

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANTS



                           Name                 State of Organization

I.       Subsidiaries of CMP Group, Inc.:

         Central Maine Power Company                    Maine
         CMP International Consultants                  Maine
                  (d/b/a CNEX)
         MaineCom Services                              Maine
           New England Investment Corporation           Delaware
           New England Business Trust                   Massachusetts
           New England Security Corp.                   Massachusetts
         New England Gas Development Corporation        Maine
         TeleSmart                                      Maine
         The Union Water-Power Company                  Maine
                  (d/b/a On Target, Combined Energies,
                  UnionLand Services)


II.      Subsidiaries of Central Maine Power Company:

         Maine Electric Power Company, Inc.             Maine
         Central Securities Corporation                 Maine
         Cumberland Securities Corporation              Maine
         NORVARCO                                       Maine
Searched for **https://www.csb.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.csb.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1780

EDWARD G. TINSLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-97-

1333-AMD)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 12, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward G. Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant

United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

suit filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346

(1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Tinsley v. United States, No. CA97-1333-AMD (D. Md. May 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED