alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### H. Kaffenberger v. The State.

*No. 596.*

*Decided February 16.*

Dogging Stock—Insufficient Fence—Hog Law—Parol Evidence.—On a prosecution under article 685, Penal Code, for dogging stock in an inclosure surrounded by an insufficient fence, where the defense was the existence of the hog law, *Seld,*that the adoption and existence of said law could not be proved by parol evidence, and could only be established by matters of record.

Appeal from the County Court of Fort Bend. Tried below before Hon. M. J. Hickey, County Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for dogging stock in an inclosure surrounded by an insufficient fence, the punishment assessed being a fine of $10.

Ho statement necessary.

*F. M. 0. Fenn, James Sly field,*and *O. G. Everett,*for appellant.

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

HURT, Presiding Judge.

Appellant offered to prove by oral testimony, to defeat his prosecution under article 685, Penal Code, that the hog law was in force in that part of the county where his farm was situated. The State objected, because records were the best evidence. The court sustained this, and appellant excepted. The appellant says the order of election was not entered upon the minutes of the Commissioners Court; hence there was no record to introduce. This is consistent with no election. If an election was ordered, it was based upon a petition. If there was such an election, there was an order proclaiming the result. Hotice of the election was given by publishing same in an appropriate newspaper, or by posting such notice at the court house and other places, as required by law. How, the appellant complains that the county judge failed to enter upon the minutes of the court the order for the election, because he failed to find such record. Strange it may seem that he failed to find the petition for the election, the order therein, or a copy thereof, or any paper relating thereto. How an election could have taken place without some legal step being taken is strange indeed.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*

Judges all present and concurring.
EXHIBIT 32



Verizon Virginia Inc.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Verizon Virginia Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods presented in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                |  |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------ |  |  |  | 
|Dated: March 30, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    LAWRENCE T. BABBIO,
JR.
|                      |  |  |  | Lawrence T. Babbio, Jr.       
|                      |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board and     
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer       



|                      |  |  |  |                         |  |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  |  |  | 
|Dated: March 30, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN F. KILLIAN 
|                      |  |  |  | John F. Killian        
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Verizon Virginia Inc. and will be retained by Verizon Virginia Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, June 18, 2007, 8:30 a.m. to June 18, 2007, 6 p.m. The River Inn, 924 25th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 22, 2007, 72 FR 28706-28708.                

The meeting will be held July 27, 2007, 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m. at the George Washington University Inn, 824 New Hampshire Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20037. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: July 12, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-3525 Filed 7-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 27, 1995 (103), Para 103.33 After Recess--11:30 P.M.]
[Page 1213]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.103.33  after recess--11:30 p.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. FOX, called the House to order.
```
§ 178.338-8 Pressure relief devices, piping, valves, and fittings. ( a ) *Pressure relief devices.* Each tank pressure relief device must be designed, constructed, and marked in accordance with § 173.318(b) of this subchapter.
( b ) *Piping, valves, and fittings.* ( 1 ) The burst pressure of all piping, pipe fittings, hoses and other pressure parts, except for pump seals and pressure relief devices, must be at least 4 times the design pressure of the tank. Additionally, the burst pressure may not be less than 4 times any higher pressure to which each pipe, pipe fitting, hose or other pressure part may be subjected to in service.
( 2 ) Pipe joints must be threaded, welded or flanged. If threaded pipe is used, the pipe and fittings must be Schedule 80 weight or heavier. Malleable metals must be used in the construction of valves and fittings. Where copper tubing is permitted, joints shall be brazed or be of equally strong metal union type. The melting point of the brazing materials may not be lower than 1000 °F. The method of joining tubing may not reduce the strength of the tubing, such as by the cutting of threads.
( 3 ) Each hose coupling must be designed for a pressure of at least 120 percent of the hose design pressure and so that there will be no leakage when connected.
( 4 ) Piping must be protected from damage due to thermal expansion and contraction, jarring, and vibration. Slip joints are not authorized for this purpose.
( 5 ) All piping, valves and fittings on a cargo tank must be proved free from leaks. This requirement is met when such piping, valves, and fittings have been tested after installation with gas or air and proved leak tight at not less than the design pressure marked on the cargo tank. This requirement is applicable to all hoses used in a cargo tank, except that hose may be tested before or after installation on the tank.
( 6 ) Each valve must be suitable for the tank design pressure at the tank design service temperature.
( 7 ) All fittings must be rated for the maximum tank pressure and suitable for the coldest temperature to which they will be subjected in actual service.
( 8 ) All piping, valves, and fittings must be grouped in the smallest practicable space and protected from damage as required by § 178.338-10.
( 9 ) When a pressure-building coil is used on a tank designed to handle oxygen or flammable ladings, the vapor connection to that coil must be provided with a valve or check valve as close to the tank shell as practicable to prevent the loss of vapor from the tank in case of damage to the coil. The liquid connection to that coil must also be provided with a valve.
[Amdt. 178-77, 48 FR 27704, June 16, 1983, as amended by Amdt. 178-89, 54 FR 25019, June 12, 1989]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2013

To provide for the display of the POW/MIA flag at each Department of

Veterans Affairs medical center until the President determines that the

fullest possible accounting of all Vietnam-era POW/MIAs has been made.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 11, 1995

Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. SPENCE, Mr. MONTGOMERY, Mr.

CUNNINGHAM, Mr. TATE, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. STOCKMAN, Mr. HOLDEN,

Mr. KING, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. WELLER, Mr.

LIPINSKI, Mr. FROST, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. LARGENT, Mr. WELDON of

Pennsylvania, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. SOLOMON, Ms. WATERS,

Mr. KENNEDY of Massachusetts, Mr. MCHALE, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. MASCARA, Mr. QUINN, Mr. FLANAGAN, Mr. BUYER, Mr. HANCOCK, Mr.

ARMEY, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota,

Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. EVANS, Ms. DUNN of Washington,

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. DELAY, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania,

Mrs. KELLY, Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. NEY, Mr. GILMAN, Ms. ESHOO, Mr.

MORAN, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma, and

Mr. GUTKNECHT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To provide for the display of the POW/MIA flag at each

Department of Veterans Affairs medical center until the

President determines that the fullest possible accounting

of all Vietnam-era POW/MIAs has been made.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2013 IH

1 SECTION 1. DISPLAY OF POW/MIA FLAG AT DEPARTMENT

2 OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTERS.

3 (a) DAILY DISPLAY OF FLAG.—Subsection (a) of sec4 tion 1084 of the National Defense Authorization Act for

5 Fiscal Years 1002 and 1993 (36 U.S.C. 189 note) is

6 amended—

7 (1) by striking out ‘‘and’’ at the end of para8 graph (1);

9 (2) by striking out the period at the end of

10 paragraph (2) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘; and’’;

11 and

12 (3) by adding at the end the following:

13 ‘‘(3) on, or on the grounds of, each Department

14 of Veterans Affairs medical center on every day on

15 which the flag of the United States is displayed.’’.

16 (b) PROCUREMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF FLAGS.—

17 (1) Subsection (c) of such section is amended by striking

18 out ‘‘Within 30 days after the date of the enactment of

19 this Act, the Administrator’’ and inserting in lieu therof

20 ‘‘The Administrator’’.

21 (2) The Administrator of General Services shall carry

22 out subsection (c) of section 1084 of the National Defense

23 Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993 (36

24 U.S.C. 189 note) with respect to the procurement and dis25 tribution of POW/MIA flags for the purposes of paragraph

26 (3) of subsection (a) of such section (as added by sub-
3

•HR 2013 IH

1 section (a) of this section) within 30 days after the date

2 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
**UNITED STATES**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549**

**FORM 10-K**

**[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)**

**OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003**

**OR**

**[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)**

**OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT****OF 1934**

**For the transition period from        to**

**Commission File No. 1-7807**

**  CHAMPION PARTS, INC.       **

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Editorial Note on Part 193
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

§ 193.2001 Scope of part. ( a ) This part prescribes safety standards for LNG facilities used in the transportation of gas by pipeline that is subject to the pipeline safety laws (49 U.S.C. 60101 *et seq.*) and Part 192 of this chapter.
( b ) This part does not apply to: ( 1 ) LNG facilities used by ultimate consumers of LNG or natural gas.
( 2 ) LNG facilities used in the course of natural gas treatment or hydrocarbon extraction which do not store LNG.
( 3 ) In the case of a marine cargo transfer system and associated facilities, any matter other than siting pertaining to the system or facilities between the marine vessel and the last manifold (or in the absence of a manifold, the last valve) located immediately before a storage tank.
( 4 ) Any LNG facility located in navigable waters (as defined in Section 3(8) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 796(8)).
[45 FR 9203, Feb. 11, 1980, as amended by Amdt. 193-1, 45 FR 57418, Aug. 28, 1980; Amdt. 193-10, 61 FR 18517, Apr. 26, 1996]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 40906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3655]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of Vision Airships, Inc.; Order of Suspension of 
Trading

July 23, 2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that the 
public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of 
trading in the securities of Vision Airships, Inc. (``Vision 
Airships'') because questions have arisen regarding the adequacy and 
accuracy of assertions made by Vision Airships in publicly disseminated 
press releases concerning among other things (1) The company's 
acquisition of blimps, (2) the existence of company negotiations with 
other entities for use of the blimps, (3) the company's funding for its 
global expansion, and (4) the potential annual revenues from airship 
use.
    Vision Airships, a company traded in the Over-the-Counter market 
under the ticker symbol VPSN, has made no public filings with the 
Commission, and has recently been the subject of spam email touting the 
company's shares.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above listed 
company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST July 23, 2007 
through 11:59 p.m. EST, on August 3, 2007.

    By the Commission.
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-3655 Filed 7-23-07; 10:48 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 45836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4002]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notification of Item Added to Meeting 
Agenda

Date of Meeting: August 7, 2007.

Status: Closed.

Previous Announcement: 71 FR 42445, August 2, 2007.

Addition: Filing with the Postal Regulatory Commission for a Negotiated 
Service Agreement.
    At its closed meeting on August 7, 2007, the Board of Governors of 
the United States Postal Service voted unanimously to add this item to 
the agenda of its closed meeting and that no earlier announcement was 
possible. The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service 
certified that in her opinion discussion of this item could be properly 
closed to public observation.

Contact Person for More Information: Wendy A. Hocking, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000.

Wendy A. Hocking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-4002 Filed 8-10-07; 3:18 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
-----Original Message----- 

From: lauratom@ameritech.net [mailto:lauratom@ameritech.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:31 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Laura Dudgeon 

1536 Mason 

Dearborn, MI 48124
Exhibit 32 .1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viropro, Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jean-Marie Dupuy, acting as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Jean-Marie Dupuy _______________________________ Jean-Marie Dupuy, Director, President, CEO  Date:   October 15, 2007
§ 1305.1 Scope; definitions. ( a ) The provisions of this part address the requirements imposed on pipeline carriers by 49 U.S.C. 15701(b) and 15701(c). Such requirements apply to pipeline carriers only with respect to the transportation of commodities other than water, gas, or oil.
( b ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (c) of this section, the provisions of this part apply to any transportation or service provided by a pipeline carrier subject to the jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board under 49 U.S.C. 15301.
( c ) The provisions of this part do not apply to any transportation or service provided by a pipeline carrier to the extent that such transportation or service is exempted from rate notice and disclosure requirements pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 15302.
( d ) For the purposes of this part, *service terms* means all classifications, rules, and practices that affect the rates, charges, or level of service for pipeline transportation.
From: jq.hannah@gmail.com [mailto:jq.hannah@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:58 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jacqueline Hannah 

105 Grossbach Dr. 

Urbana, IL 61802
§ 211.75 Evidence. ( a ) The Federal Rules of Evidence for United States Courts and Magistrates shall be employed as general guidelines for the introduction of evidence in proceedings under this subpart. However, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, all relevant and probative evidence offered by a party shall be received in evidence.
( b ) The presiding officer may deny the admission of evidence which is determined to be— ( 1 ) Unduly repetitive; or
( 2 ) So extensive and lacking in relevance or probative effect that its admission would impair the prompt, orderly, and fair resolution of the proceeding.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Datakey, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, David A. Feste, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: May 5, 2004Signature:
    
    /s/ David A. FesteDavid A. FesteChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-109669, 333-106292 and 333-106292-01) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-54993, 333-57220, 333-16201, 333-34776, 333-45084, 333-45082, 333-37392, 333-107013, 333-69079, 333-121152, 333-121153 and 333-121155) of Energy East Corporation of our report dated March 14, 2005, relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
March 14, 2005
#### The People of the State of New York *v.*William Clemons.

Motion denied, with leave to renew the same before Mr. Justice Barker, at Chambers, on five days’ notice to Rufus Scott, defendant’s counsel.
<PAGE>
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of 
Bell Atlantic - West Virginia, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 60126) of our report 
dated February 5, 1996, which includes an explanatory paragraph stating that 
the Company discontinued accounting for its operations in accordance with 
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects 
of Certain Types of Regulation," effective August 1, 1994, and changed its 
method of accounting for income taxes and postemployment benefits in 1993, on 
our audits of the financial statements and financial statement schedule of the 
Company as of December 31, 1995 and December 31, 1994, and for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1995, which report is included in this 
Annual Report on Form 10-K.


COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

2400 Eleven Penn Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 27, 1996