alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 D0 40 7 . KI M C. FLORENCE v . J ERRI E FLORENCE.

Ki m Fl o ren ce, pr oceed i n g p ro s e, s eek s a d i s cret i o n ary ap peal fro m a pu rp o rt ed

o rd er ci t i n g h er fo r cri m i n al t res p as s. In her ap p l i cat i o n m at eri al s , Fl oren ce m ai n t ai n s

t h at t h e co urt en t ered a n o rd er o f cri m in al t res p as s ag ai n s t h er on March 19

, 2 0 1 8.

Ho wev er, a co p y o f th i s o rd er was n o t i n cl u d ed i n t h e ap p l i cat i o n m at eri al s

. Th e o n l y

o rd er i n cl u d ed i n t h e ap p l i cat i o n m at eri al s i s o n e en t ered on Decem ber 2 8

, 2 0 1 7,

d i s m i s s i n g a t em

p o rary p ro t ect i v e o rd er. Th i s Co u rt p rev i o u s l y ret u rn ed Fl o ren ce’ s

ap p li cat io n fo r v ari o u s defi ci en ci es , i n cl u d in g th e ab sen ce o f t h e o rd er s o u g h t t o b e

ap p eal ed

. Up o n ret u rn , Fl o ren ce was i n fo rm ed t hat s h e n eed ed to p ro vi d e th e M arch

1 9

, 2 0 1 8 o rd er sh e s o u g h t t o ap p eal

, wh i ch s he fai l ed t o d o. Acco rd i n g l y , Fl o ren ce

h as fai l ed t o i n cl u d e i n h er ap p l i cat i o n a co p y o f t h e o rd er co m p l ai n ed of as req u i red

b y OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (c) a n d R u l e 3 1 ( e ) o f t h e Ru l es o f t h e Co u rt o f Ap p eal s

. See

Ha r per v. Ha r

p er , 2 5 9 Ga. 2 4 6, 2 4 6 (3 7 8 SE2 d 6 7 3 ) (1 9 8 9 ). Becau s e Fl o ren ce h as

fai l ed t o co m

p l y wi t h t h e cl ear m an d at e o f OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (c) an d Ru l e 3 1 (e), h er

ap p li cat io n i s fat al l y

d efi ci en t an d m

us t t herefo re b e DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. April 24, 2018

04/24/2018
§ 220.61 Radio transmission of mandatory directives. ( a ) Each mandatory directive may be transmitted by radio only when authorized by the railroad's operating rules. The directive shall be transmitted in accordance with the railroad's operating rules and the requirements of this part.
( b ) The procedure for transmission of a mandatory directive is as follows: ( 1 ) The train dispatcher or operator shall call the addressees of the mandatory directive and state the intention to transmit the mandatory directive.
( 2 ) Before the mandatory directive is transmitted, the employee to receive and copy shall state the employee's name, identification, location, and readiness to receive and copy. An employee operating the controls of moving equipment shall not receive and copy mandatory directives. A mandatory directive shall not be transmitted to employees on moving equipment, if such directive cannot be received and copied without impairing safe operation of the equipment.
( 3 ) A mandatory directive shall be copied in writing by the receiving employee in the format prescribed in the railroad's operating rules.
( 4 ) After the mandatory directive has been received and copied, it shall be immediately repeated in its entirety. After verifying the accuracy of the repeated mandatory directive, the train dispatcher or operator shall then state the time and name of the employee designated by the railroad who is authorized to issue mandatory directives. An employee copying a mandatory directive shall then acknowledge by repeating the time and name of the employee so designated by the railroad.
( 5 ) ( i ) For train crews, before a mandatory directive is acted upon, the conductor and engineer shall each have a written copy of the mandatory directive and make certain that the mandatory directive is read and understood by all members of the crew who are responsible for the operation of the train. Mandatory directives which have been fulfilled or canceled shall be marked with an “X” or in accordance with the railroad's operating rules, and retained for the duration of the train crew's work assignment.
( ii ) For on-track equipment, before a mandatory directive is acted upon, the employee responsible for on-track safety shall have a written copy of the mandatory directive, and make certain that the mandatory directive is acknowledged by all employees who are responsible for executing that mandatory directive. The employee responsible for on-track safety shall retain a copy of the mandatory directive while it is in effect.
( 6 ) A mandatory directive which has not been completed or which does not comply with the requirements of the railroad's operating rules and this part, may not be acted upon and shall be treated as though not sent. Information contained in a mandatory directive may not be acted upon by persons other than those to whom the mandatory directive is addressed.
§ 210.23 Authorization. ( a ) An inspector is authorized to perform any noise test prescribed in the Standards and in the procedures of this part at any time, at any appropriate location, and without prior notice to the railroad, for the purpose of determining whether railroad equipment is in compliance with the Standards.
( b ) ( 1 ) An inspector is authorized to request that railroad equipment and appropriate railroad personnel be made available for a passby or stationary noise emission test, as prescribed in the Standards and in the procedures of this part, and to conduct such test, at a reasonable time and location, for the purpose of determining whether the railroad equipment is in compliance with the Standards.
( 2 ) If the railroad has the capability to perform an appropriate noise emission test, as prescribed in the Standards and in the procedures of this part, an inspector is authorized to request that the railroad test railroad equipment. The railroad shall perform the appropriate test as soon as practicable.
( 3 ) The request referred to in this paragraph will be in writing, will state the grounds upon which the inspector has reason to believe that the railroad equipment does not conform to the Standards, and will be presented to an appropriate operating official of the railroad.
( 4 ) Testing or submission for testing is not required if the cause of the noise defect is readily apparent and the inspector verifies that it is corrected by the replacement of defective components or by instituting a normal maintenance or repair procedure.
( c ) ( 1 ) An inspector is authorized to inspect or examine a locomotive, rail car, or consist of a locomotive and rail cars operated by a railroad, or to request that the railroad inspect or examine the locomotive, rail car, or consist of a locomotive and rail cars, whenever the inspector has reason to believe that it does not conform to the requirements of the Standards.
( 2 ) An inspector may request that a railroad conduct an inspection or examination of a locomotive, rail car, or consist of a locomotive and rail cars on the basis of an excessive noise emission level measured by a passby test. If, after such inspection or examination, no mechanical condition that would result in a noise defect can be found and the inspector verifies that no such mechanical condition exists, the locomotive, rail car, or consist of a locomotive and rail cars may be continued in service.
( 3 ) The requests referred to in this paragraph will be in writing, will state the grounds upon which the inspector has reason to believe that the locomotive, rail car, or consist of a locomotive and rail cars does not conform to the Standards, and will be presented to an appropriate operating official of the railroad.
( 4 ) The inspection or examination referred to in this paragraph may be conducted only at recognized inspection points or scheduled stopping points.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending June 23, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location            | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|--------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|FARMERS BK, HARDINSBURG, KENTUCKY | 525446 | 03/05/2012 | 06/07/2012     | O         | Small Bank 
|FORDYCE B&TC, FORDYCE, ARKANSAS   | 314444 | 03/05/2012 | 06/08/2012     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 194.117 Training. ( a ) Each operator shall conduct training to ensure that: ( 1 ) All personnel know— ( i ) Their responsibilities under the response plan,
( ii ) The name and address of, and the procedure for contacting, the operator on a 24-hour basis, and
( iii ) The name of, and procedures for contacting, the qualified individual on a 24-hour basis;
( 2 ) Reporting personnel know— ( i ) The content of the information summary of the response plan,
( ii ) The toll-free telephone number of the National Response Center, and
( iii ) The notification process; and
( 3 ) Personnel engaged in response activities know— ( i ) The characteristics and hazards of the oil discharged,
( ii ) The conditions that are likely to worsen emergencies, including the consequences of facility malfunctions or failures, and the appropriate corrective actions,
( iii ) The steps necessary to control any accidental discharge of oil and to minimize the potential for fire, explosion, toxicity, or environmental damage, and
( iv ) The proper firefighting procedures and use of equipment, fire suits, and breathing apparatus.
( b ) Each operator shall maintain a training record for each individual that has been trained as required by this section. These records must be maintained in the following manner as long as the individual is assigned duties under the response plan: ( 1 ) Records for operator personnel must be maintained at the operator's headquarters; and
( 2 ) Records for personnel engaged in response, other than operator personnel, shall be maintained as determined by the operator.
( c ) Nothing in this section relieves an operator from the responsibility to ensure that all response personnel are trained to meet the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards for emergency response operations in 29 CFR 1910.120, including volunteers or casual laborers employed during a response who are subject to those standards pursuant to 40 CFR part 311.
-----Original Message----- 

From: cahbookworm@yahoo.com [mailto:cahbookworm@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:11 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Carol Harris 

33 Cleveland Avenue 

Blackwood, NJ 08012
-----Original Message----- 

From: tsbfll@aol.com [mailto:tsbfll@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:44 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Timothy Bussell 

2970 NE 16th Ave B205 

Oakland Park, FL 33334
-----Original Message----- 

From: jjparish@dragonbbs.com [mailto:jjparish@dragonbbs.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:13 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

james parish 

11200 hooper ridge 

glouster, OH 45732
**Exhibit 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, W. Douglas Parker,the Chief Executive Officer of America West Airlines, Inc. (the “Company”) andDerek J. Kerr, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that,to the best of their knowledge:
1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March31, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the“Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 20thday of April, 2004.    /s/ W. Douglas Parker W. Douglas Parker Chief Executive Officer    /s/ Derek J. Kerr Derek J. Kerr Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



CERTIFICATION



I, Thomas D. OMalley, Chief Executive Officer of Premcor Inc. (the Company), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify as follows with respect to the Company:



| | 1. | The annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification on this 5thday of March, 2004.



By:

/S/    Thomas D. OMalleyChief Executive Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Premcor Inc. and will be retained by Premcor Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: janell.weber@gmail.com [mailto:janell.weber@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:21 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Janell Weber 

2230 Shefifeld Dr 

Fort Collins, CO 80526
§ 1510.13 Remittance of security service fees. ( a ) Each direct air carrier and foreign air carrier must remit all security service fees imposed each calendar month to TSA, as directed by the Administrator, by the last calendar day of the month following the imposition.
( b ) Direct air carriers and foreign air carriers may retain any interest that accrues on the principal amounts collected between the date of collection and the date the fee is remitted to TSA in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Direct air carriers and foreign air carriers are prohibited from retaining any portion of the principal to offset the costs of collecting, handling, or remitting the passenger security service fees.
( d ) Security service fees are payable to the “Transportation Security Administration” in U.S. currency and drawn on a U.S. bank. ( 1 ) Fees of $1,000 or more must be remitted by electronic funds transfer.
( 2 ) Fees under $1,000 may be remitted by electronic funds transfer, check, money order, wire transfer, or draft.
( e ) Direct air carriers and foreign air carriers are responsible for paying any bank processing charges on the security service fees collected or remitted under this part when such charges are assessed on the U.S. government.
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Citicorp (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert B. Willumstad, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Todd S. Thomson, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ROBERT B. WILLUMSTADRobert B. Willumstad
Chief Executive Officer
March 17, 2004 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/TODD S. THOMSONTodd S. Thomson
Chief Financial Officer
March 17, 2004           |  | 

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
#### § 220.302 Operating rules implementing the requirements of this subpart.

Each railroad shall adopt operating rules that implement the requirements of this subpart.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
PHILIP C . B IKLE, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt,
v. A. SANTOS, Offic e r, in his individua l c a pa c i ty ; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 14-55077 D.C . No. 8:13-c v-01662-DOC -JPR
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Dav id O. C arte r, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

June 22, 2015 ** B e fore : HAW K INS, GR AB ER , a nd W . FLETC H ER , C irc uit Judge s . Philip C . B ikle a

ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dismissing his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a rising out of a

tra ffic c ita

tion. W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie wde novo, Barre tt v . Be lle q ue , 544 F.3d 1060, 

# F IL ED
JUL 01 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U

. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).1061 (9th C ir. 2008), a nd we a ffirm
. The distric t c ourt prope rly dism isse d B ikle ’ s a c tion a s frivolous be c a use B ikle ’ s c l a i m s la c ke d a

ny argua ble ba sis in la

wor fa c t. Se eN

e itzk ev . W illiams , 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) (a “ frivolous”c la im

la c ks a n a rgua ble ba s is e ithe r in la

w or in fa c t; “ [the ] te rm

‘ frivolous’ . . . e m

bra c e s not only

the ina rgua ble le ga l
c onc lusion, but a

lso thefanc iful fa c tua l a l le gation” ); se ealso N e w York v . C lass , 475 U.S. 106, 114, 117-18 (1986) (the re is “ n o re a s ona

ble e xpe c t ation of priva c y ” in a ve hic le ’ s VIN num

be r unde r the Fourth Am e ndm e nt); c f. In re Arturo D , 38 P.3d 433, 450-51 (C a l. 2002) (a polic e offic e r’ s lim ite d

se a rc h of the ve hic le ’ s glove c om

p artm e nt a

nd othe r are a s c onstitute d a re a sona ble se arc h whe n the pla i ntiff wa s una

ble to produc e a

drive r’ s lic e nse and re gistra tion). The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion by

dism i ssing B ikle ’ s a c tion without le ave to a

m e nd be c a

use am e ndm e nt would ha ve be e n futile
. Se eLope

z v . Smith , 203 F.3d 1122, 1130 (9th C ir. 2000) (e n ba nc ) (se tting forth sta

nda rd of
re vie w). W e do not c onside r issue s or a rgum e nts ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l

. Se e Padge tt v . W

right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). B ikle ’ s re que sts for judic ia l notic e , file d on August 28, 2014, a re de nie d. AFFIRM E D.
2 1 4
- 5 5 0 7 7
§ 178.33a-6 Manufacture. ( a ) By appliances and methods that will assure uniformity of completed containers; dirt and scale to be removed as necessary; no defect acceptable that is likely to weaken the finished container appreciably; reasonably smooth and uniform surface finish required.
( b ) Seams when used must be as follows: ( 1 ) Circumferential seams. By welding, swedging, brazing, soldering, or double seaming.
( 2 ) Side seams. By welding, brazing or soldering.
( c ) Ends. The ends shall be of pressure design.
[Order 71, 31 FR 9074, July 1, 1966. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967]