alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2113

To renew and extend patents relating to certain devices that aid in the

acceleration of bodily tissue healing and the reduction of pain.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 25, 1995

Mr. ACKERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To renew and extend patents relating to certain devices

that aid in the acceleration of bodily tissue healing and

the reduction of pain.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PATENT.

4 The Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Com5 missioner of Patents and Trademarks, shall, when the pat6 ent numbered 4,226,246 (relating to an apparatus for

7 maintaining the negative potential of human, animal, and

8 plant cells) expires, extend the patent, with all the rights

9 pertaining thereto, for a period of 10 years beginning on

10 the date of the patent’s expiration.
2

•HR 2113 IH

1 SEC. 2. RENEWAL AND EXTENSION OF PATENTS.

2 (a) RENEWAL AND EXTENSION.—The Secretary of

3 Commerce, acting through the Commissioner of Patents,

4 shall renew and extend each of the patents described in

5 subsection (b), with all the rights pertaining thereto, for

6 a period of 10 years beginning on the date of the patent’s

7 renewal and extension. The Secretary shall take the ac8 tions required by this section as soon as possible, but not

9 later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this

10 Act.

11 (b) DESCRIPTION OF PATENTS.—Subsection (a) shall

12 apply to the patents bearing the following numbers:

13 (1) 3,670,737 (relating to an ultra-short wave

14 athermapeutic (non-thermal pulsed high-peak high15 frequency electromagnetic energy) apparatus).

16 (2) 3,566,877 (relating to an electrotherma17 peutic apparatus and treatment head, and method

18 for tuning the treatment head).

19 (3) 3,464,010 (relating to a power meter for an

20 athermapeutic apparatus).

21 (4) 3,181,535 (relating to an athermapeutic ap22 paratus).

23 (5) 3,043,310 (relating to a treatment head for

24 an athermapeutic apparatus).

25 (c) INTERVENING RIGHTS.—The renewal and exten26 sion of the patents described in subsection (b) shall not
3

•HR 2113 IH

1 result in infringement of any of the patents on account

2 of any use of the subject matter of the patent if such use,

3 or substantial preparation for such use, began after the

4 patent expired but before the date of the enactment of

5 this Act.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

The undersignedcertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

 

(1) Theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31,2005, fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

Date: September 9, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/ Joseph C.  Christenson                   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph C. Christenson,  President,           |
|   | Chief Executive Officer  and Chief Financial |
|   | Officer                                      |

 

----
Exhibit 12.2

Public Service Company of Oklahoma
Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
For Years Ended December 31

                         1995       1994       1993      1992       1991
                                 (thousands, except ratios)

Operating income       $111,769    $98,258    $72,156   $78,096    $86,796
Adjustments:
   Income taxes          37,490     27,954     13,554      (835)    18,321
   Provision for
     deferred income
     taxes                2,704      7,779      9,537    21,157     10,133
   Deferred investment
     tax credits         (2,789)    (2,789)    (2,838)   (2,711)    (2,925)
   Other income
     and deductions       2,274        933        531      (940)    (1,667)
   Allowance for
     borrowed and equity
     funds used during
     construction         3,734      2,513      1,948       740      1,931
   Interest portion of
     financing leases        --         --         17        37         34
     Earnings          $155,182   $134,648    $94,905   $95,544   $112,623


Fixed charges:
 Interest on long-
   term debt            $29,594    $29,594    $31,410   $30,688    $30,545
 Interest on short-
   term debt and other    6,355      3,844      2,729     1,646      3,286
 Interest portion of
   financing leases          --         --         17        37         34
    Fixed charges       $35,949    $33,438    $34,156   $32,371    $33,865


Ratio of earnings to
  fixed charges            4.32       4.03       2.78      2.95       3.33
-----Original Message----- 

From: KMcSchmelzer@aol.com [mailto:KMcSchmelzer@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:17 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kathleen McCabe 

36 Summer St. 

Gloucester, MA 01930
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted April 6, 2011 Decided April 12, 2011 Before
JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

No. 10

‐ 3578

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

‐ Appellee ,

v.
SHUMOND M. LONG, Defendant

‐ Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.

No. 10

‐ CR

‐ 54

‐ BBC

‐ 01

Barbara B. Crabb, Judge

.

O R D E R Shumond Long was arrested after he and a coconspirator sold ten grams of crack cocaine to an undercover federal agent in a Wisconsin Dells bar and grill. Long pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and was sentenced to 84 months’ imprisonment. Long filed a noti ce of appeal, but his appointe d lawyer moves to withdraw, having identified no arguable issue to pursue. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Long has not accepted our invitation to respond to counsel’s motion. See C IR

. R. 51(b). We limit our review to the potential issu es identified in counsel’s facially adequate brief. See United States v. Schuh , 289 F.3d 968, 973-74 (7th Cir. 2002). NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 10

‐ 3578 Page 2 Long has given no indication that he wants his guilty plea vacated, so counsel properly omits any discussion of the adequacy of the plea colloquy or the voluntariness of the plea. See United States v. Knox , 287 F.3d 667, 670-72 (7th Cir. 2002). Counsel first evaluates whether Long co uld challenge the calculation of his guidelines range, but rightly concludes that any such challenge would be frivolous. As counsel notes, Long agreed with the probat ion officer’s determinat ion that he faced a guidelines range of 168 to 210 months’ impr isonment and the district court properly adopted that calculation (based on a total offe nse level of 33 and a criminal history category of III). Counsel next considers whether Long coul d argue that his 84-month prison sentence is substantively unreasonable. Here the district court specifically discussed the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and imposed a sentence that was one half the bottom of the guidelines range to ameliorate the disparity between se ntences for crack and powder cocaine. Counsel can think of no reason why the presumption of reasonableness to below-range sentences would not stand, see Rita v. United States , 551 U.S. 338, 347 (2007); United States v. Pape , 601 F.3d 743, 746 (7th Cir. 2010), nor can we.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRAN TED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
-----Original Message----- 

From: snowberries3@gmail.com [mailto:snowberries3@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:04 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ruth Zemek 

3303 E. Clarendon 

Phoenix, AZ 85018
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Carol A. Rice, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of Paulson Capital Corp.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in thisquarterly report;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a.     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

 

b.     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.     Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in thecase of an quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a.     All significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| Dated: August 12, 2004 |                      |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------|
|                        |                      |
|                        | /s/ Carol Rice            |   |
|                        | (Carol A. Rice)           |   |
|                        | (Chief Financial Officer) |   |
|                             |                           |  |  |

 

----
# EUR-Lex - 52004AP0071(01) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52004AP0071(01)

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Monaco providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC of 3 June 2003 on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments (COM(2004)0733 — C6-0202/2004 — 2004/0264(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 208 E , 25/08/2005 P. 0037 - 0038 *

P6_TA(2004)0071

EC-Monaco Agreement (taxation of savings income) *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Monaco providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC of 3 June 2003 on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments (COM(2004)0733 — C6-0202/2004 — 2004/0264(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2004)0733) [1],

- having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Monaco providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC of 3 June 2003 on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments,

- having regard to Article 94, Article 300(2), first subparagraph, and Article 300(4) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0202/2004),

- having regard to Rules 51 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A6-0042/2004),

1. Approves the conclusion of the agreement;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Principality of Monaco.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
From: temmottactorforhire@yahoo.com 

[mailto:temmottactorforhire@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:44 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Tom Emmott 

PO Box 5243 

Traverse City, MI 49696
# C o u r t o f A p p e a l s

o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g i a

A T L A N T A

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Th e C o u rt o f A p p e a l s h e re b y p a sse s t h e f o l l o w i n g o rd e r:

A 1 9 E 0 0 1 1

. D A

V ID SU N DY e t a l

. v

. C H A R L E S B A

K E R e t a l

.

H a v i n g r e a d a

n d c o n si d e r e d t

h e “ R u l e 4 0 ( b ) E

m e r g e n c y M

o t i o n f o r Pr o c e ss t o

b e I ssu e d ” t

h e s a m e i s h e r e b y D E

N I E D

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g i a

C l e r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t l a n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t

r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t

h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## September 19, 2018

09/19/2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                            1102
<SECURITIES>                                      7613
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4318
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (83)
<INVENTORY>                                       2487
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 15628
<PP&E>                                            6033
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (3762)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   21230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2610
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         18706
<OTHER-SE>                                        (86)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     21230
<SALES>                                           4107
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4107
<CGS>                                             1777
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (136)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (541)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (541)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (541)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)


</TABLE>
§ 1503.653 Argument before the ALJ. ( a ) *Arguments during the hearing.* During the hearing, the ALJ must give the parties a reasonable opportunity to present arguments on the record supporting or opposing motions, objections, and rulings if the parties request an opportunity for argument. The ALJ may request written arguments during the hearing if the ALJ finds that submission of written arguments is necessary before the ALJ issues the ruling or order.
( b ) *Final oral argument.* At the conclusion of the hearing and before the ALJ issues an initial decision in the proceedings, the parties are entitled to submit oral proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, exceptions to rulings of the ALJ, and supporting arguments for the findings, conclusions, or exceptions. At the conclusion of the hearing, a party may waive final oral argument.
( c ) *Posthearing briefs.* The ALJ may request written posthearing briefs before the ALJ issues an initial decision in the proceedings. If a party files a written posthearing brief, the party must include proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, exceptions to rulings of the ALJ, and supporting arguments for the findings, conclusions, or exceptions. The ALJ must give the parties a reasonable opportunity, not more than 30 days after receipt of the transcript, to prepare and submit the briefs.
-----Original Message----- 

From: cmeacham4@comcast.net [mailto:cmeacham4@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:39 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Carolyn V. Meacham 

PO BOX 175 

GLEN RIDGE, NJ 07028
<PAGE>





                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United Bancorporation of
Alabama, Inc. for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
R. Jones, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

       (1).   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

       (2).   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Corporation.


Date: November 14, 2003                       By: /s/ Robert R. Jones, III
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Robert R. Jones, III
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VICORPRestaurants, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 19,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), each of the undersigned, Kenneth Keymer, Chief ExecutiveOfficer, and Anthony Carroll, Chief Financial Officer and Chief AdministrativeOfficer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief,that:
|        | 1)     | the Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | 2)     | the information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 
| Date: May 31, 2007 |   | /s/ Kenneth Keymer                                              |   |
|--------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|               |   | Kenneth Keymer                                                  |
|               |   | Chief Executive Officer                                         |
|               |   |                                                            |
|               |   |                                                            |
| Date: May 31, 2007 |   | /s/ Anthony Carroll                                             |   |
|               |   | Anthony Carroll                                                 |
|               |   | Chief Financial  Officer and Chief

Administrative Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to VICORP Restaurants, Inc. and will be retained by VICORPRestaurants, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

----
#### § 220.41 [Reserved]