alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB

House Calendar No. 156

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1718

[Report No. 104–413]

To designate the United States courthouse located at 197 South Main Street

in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Max Rosenn United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1995

Mr. KANJORSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

DECEMBER 18 (legislative day, DECEMBER 15), 1995

Additional sponsors: Mr. CLINGER, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. MASCARA, Mr. KLINK,

Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania, Mr. BORSKI, Mr. MURTHA, Mr. MCHALE, Mr.

ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr. MCDADE, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. COYNE, Mr.

DOYLE, Mr. GEKAS, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. GREENWOOD, Mr. FOGLIETTA,

Mr. WALKER, Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, and Mr. GOODLING

DECEMBER 18 (legislative day, DECEMBER 15), 1995

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located at 197

South Main Street in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, as

the ‘‘Max Rosenn United States Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 1718 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse located at 197 South

5 Main Street in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, shall be

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Max Rosenn United States

7 Courthouse’’.

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the court11 house referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a ref12 erence to the ‘‘Max Rosenn United States Courthouse’’.

House Calendar No. 156

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1718

[Report No. 104–413]

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located

D

Courthouse’’.Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Max Rosenn United Statesat 197 South Main Street in Wilkes-Barre,

ECEMBER 18 (legislative day, DECEMBER 15), 1995

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
----

 

| CLECO CORPORATION  | EXHIBIT 23(a) |
|-------------------------|---------------|

Consent of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm

    Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Form S-3 (Nos. 333-109506 and 333-55656) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-10169,33-26726, 33-38362, 33-44663, 333-44364, 333-59692, 333-59696, 333-124716, and333-127496) of Cleco Corporation of our report dated February 28, 2006, relatingto the financial statements, financial statement schedules, management's assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 

| /s/   PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|---------------------------------------|
| New  Orleans, Louisiana               |
| February  28, 2006                    |

----
§ 176.192 Cargo handling equipment for freight containers carrying Class 1 (explosive) materials. ( a ) Except in an emergency, only cargo handling equipment that has been specifically designed or modified for the handling of freight containers may be used to load, unload, or handle freight containers containing Division 1.1 or 1.2 (explosive) materials.
( b ) The gross weight of a freight container containing Class 1 (explosive) materials may not exceed the safe working load of the cargo handling equipment by which it is handled.
[Amdt. 176-30, 55 FR 52696, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 66 FR 45384, Aug. 28, 2001]
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                      Chief Financial Officer Certification
  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for the period ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ,
I, Danice L. Chartrand, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

    3.  The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
        and

    4.  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company.


Date:  November 13, 2003
       -----------------
                                        /s/ Danice L. Chartrand
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Danice L. Chartrand, Chief Financial
                                        Officer



This certification accompanies the Periodic Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc.
and will be retained by Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      E-7
#### Marsh-Burke Company, appellant, v. John H. Yost, appellee.

Filed December 14, 1918.

No. 20214.

Judgment: Res Judicata. When a petition shows that recovery is sought on a matter adjudicated in a former suit between the same parties, it is subject to a general demurrer.

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Wi-llard E. Stewart, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*R. J. Greene,*for appellant.

*Stiner é Boslaugh, contra.*

Morrissey, C. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover, as exemplary damages, under section 4062, Rev. St. 1913, twice the amount of compehsatory damages awarded it in a previous suit. The trial court sustained a general demurrer to the petition, and plaintiff appeals.

In the former suit *(Marsh-Burke Co. v. Yost,*98 Neb. 523) plaintiff obtained a verdict for $38,000 actual damages, resulting from a conspiracy to drive it out of business. The trial court reduced this verdict to $23,000, and plaintiff, rather than ..submit to a new trial, permitted judgment to be entered for that amount. Thereafter a motion was filed to have this judgment trebled, under section 4062, Rev. St. 1913, which provides that, in actions of the character involved, the plaintiff is entitled to recover threefold damages. The court denied this motion, and, when the' case was brought to this court by defendant, plaintiff filed a *815cross-appeal. This court, in its opinion, disposed of the cross-appeal in the following language:

> “By its cross-appeal plaintiff contends that the district court erred in refusing to render a, judgment in its favor for triple damages. It must he observed that the plaintiff, by its petition, prayed only for compensatory damages. No claim was made in any of the pleadings or proceedings at any time for triple damages, as provided by section 4062 of the Junldn act, until after the trial court had rendered its judgment on the verdict. The case appears to have been tried and submitted to the jury on the theory that plaintiff should recover only compensation for the injuries it had sustained by defendant’s unlawful acts. It would also seem that plaintiff, by filing its remittitur of $15,000, and asking the court to render a judgment for $23,000, was not thereafter in a position to require the court to ¿ripie the amount of the judgment.”

Plaintiff, by praying only for compensatory damages, by remitting a portion of the verdict to avoid a new trial, and by consenting to the entry of a judgment for the lesser amount, waived any right which it may have had under the statute to claim triple damages.

The demurrer was properly sustained, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Letton, Rose and Aldrich, JJ., not sitting.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 6, 1995 (110), Para 110.14 Messages from the President]
[Page 1303]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.110.14  messages from the president

  Sundry messages in writing from the President of the United States 
were communicated to the House by Mr. Edwin Thomas, one of his 
secretaries.
```
From: gordonpdx@gmail.com [mailto:gordonpdx@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:37 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Gordon Johnston 

2917 North Halleck Street 

Portland, OR 97217
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandra M. Peay, Contact Representative, or Renee Hallman, Contact Representative, Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room H-303, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3100.

By Direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 07-4150 Filed 8-23-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
From: mbuiso@bresnan.net [mailto:mbuiso@bresnan.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:05 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Margi Buiso 

1065 C.R. 204 

Durango, CO 81301
# EUR-Lex - 52002XC0425(04) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52002XC0425(04)

**Commission notice concerning preferential agreements providing for diagonal cumulation of origin between the Community, Bulgaria, Switzerland (including Liechtenstein), the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Iceland, Lithuania, Latvia, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and Turkey **

*
Official Journal C 100 , 25/04/2002 P. 0005 - 0007 *

Commission notice concerning preferential agreements providing for diagonal cumulation of origin between the Community, Bulgaria, Switzerland (including Liechtenstein), the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Iceland, Lithuania, Latvia, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and Turkey

(2002/C 100/05)

Articles 3 and 4 of the protocols defining the concept of "originating products" and methods of administrative cooperation to the preferential agreements concluded between the European Community and, respectively, Bulgaria, Switzerland, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Iceland, Lithuania, Latvia, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovenia and the Slovak Republic, and between the European Coal and Steel Community and Turkey, and Article 3 of Protocol 4 to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, provide for diagonal cumulation of origin between the countries concerned.

Under paragraph 4 of the provisions in question, the Community and the countries concerned notify each other, through the European Commission, of agreements and the associated origin rules in force with the other countries. The European Commission then publishes in the "C" series of the Official Journal of the European Communities the date on which the cumulation provided for in this Article may be applied by the countries meeting the requisite conditions.

The table below shows the situation with regard to agreements between the countries involved in such cumulation, based on the notifications received from the countries concerned, specifying the dates of entry into force of the associated origin protocols and amendments thereto.

THE SITUATION OF FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS PROVIDING FOR APPLICATION OF DIAGONAL CUMULATION BETWEEN THE EC, CEFTA COUNTRIES, EFTA STATES, BALTIC STATES AND TURKEY

>TABLE>

LEGEND:

- No FTA concluded.

NPY Not published yet.

1. Introduction of the "Pan-European cumulation".

2. Incorporation of Turkey into the "Pan-European" group of countries - target date 1 January 1999.

3. Introduction of the euro and certain list rule changes - target date 1 January 2000.

00.00.0000 In cases where countries apply between themselves the amended provisions of the agreements or agreements as such from different dates, these dates are being indicated in bold. The provisions concerned can be applied in trade relations between these countries from the latter date.

NB:

Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia are members of the CEFTA (Central European Free Trade Agreement), whose agreement includes one origin protocol (number 7) applying diagonal cumulation of origin between these countries in the context of pan-European cumulation.
-----Original Message----- 

From: zeldina26@yahoo.com [mailto:zeldina26@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 7:58 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lisa Banik 

16 Cardinal Lane 

Waterbury, CT 06708
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 27, 1995 (103), Para 103.36 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1213]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.103.36  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. YOUNG of Florida: Committee on Appropriations. H.R. 
     2126. A bill making appropriations for the Department of 
     Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and 
     for other purposes (Rept. No. 104-208). Referred to the 
     Committee on the Whole House on the State of the Union.
       Mr. PORTER: Committee on Appropriations. H.R. 2127. A bill 
     making appropriations for the Departments of Labor, Health 
     and Human Services, and Education, and related agencies, for 
     the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other 
     purposes (Rept. No. 104-209). Referred to the Committee of 
     the Whole House on the State of the Union.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: whned@aol.com [mailto:whned@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:28 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Elizabeth Darby 

6605 W. Burnside Rd., #137 

Portland, OR 97210
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, May 12, 1995 (65), Para 65.14 Adjournment Over]
[Page 697]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.65.14  adjournment over

  On motion of Mr. ARMEY, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn to meet at 
10:30 a.m. on Monday, May 15, 1995, for ``morning hour debates''.
```
reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation offinancial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report basedon such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting;5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 12, 2009         */s/ Allen O. Jones, Jr.*   Allen O. Jones, Jr.   Senior Vice President and CFO
Exhibit 10.1

July 1, 2009

PAULSON CAPITAL CORP.

FORM OF

INCENTIVE
STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

UNDER 1999 STOCK OPTION PLAN

This INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT is made between PAULSON CAPITAL CORP. (the Company), an Oregon corporation, and
(the Optionee), pursuant to the Companys 1999 Stock Option Plan (the Plan). The Company and
the Optionee agree as follows:

1. Option Grant: The Company hereby grants to the Optionee, on the terms and
conditions of this Agreement and the Plan, the right and the option (the Option) to purchase all or any of  shares (the Grant Shares) of the
Companys Common Stock at a purchase price of $1.13 per share. The terms and conditions applicable to grants of options of the Companys Common Stock, as set forth in the Plan, are hereby incorporated into and made part of this Agreement.

2. Time of Exercise of Option. The grant date of this Option is effective as of July 1, 2009(the
Grant Date). Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein and until the Option expires or is terminated as provided in the Plan, the Option may be exercised from time to time to purchase Grant Shares as follows:

On July 1, 2009, this Option shall become immediately exercisable to purchase all of the Grant Shares.

3. Expiration: The Option shall continue in effect until the earlier of June 30, 2016, or the date thirty days after the
Optionees service with the Company terminates (other than by reason of death or total disability, in which case the Option shall terminate 12 months after such termination of service), unless earlier terminated as provided in the Plan.





|                      |  |                       |  |          |  | 
|--------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | -------- |  | 
|PAULSON CAPITAL CORP. |  |                       |  | OPTIONEE
|                      |  |                       | 
|By:                   |  |                       |  |          |  | 
|                      |  | Jacqueline M. Paulson |  |          |  | 
|                      |  | Corporate Secretary   |  |          |  |
#### § 178.348-3 Pumps, piping, hoses and connections.

Each pump and all piping, hoses and connections on each cargo tank motor vehicle must conform to § 178.345-9, except that the use of nonmetallic pipes, valves, or connections are authorized on DOT 412 cargo tanks.

[Amdt. 178-89, 55 FR 37065, Sept. 7, 1990. Redesignated by Amdt. 178-112, 61 FR 18934, Apr. 29, 1996]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending February 9, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
-----Original Message----- 

From: kathy.john@xplornet.com [mailto:kathy.john@xplornet.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:29 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kathleen LePoer 

11 Nagog Hill Rd. 

Littleton, MA 01460