alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2090 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2090

     To reduce the number of executive branch political appointees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 1995

Mr. Luther (for himself, Mr. Gutknecht, and Mr. Condit) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                          Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To reduce the number of executive branch political appointees.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN NUMBER OF POLITICAL APPOINTEES.

    (a) Definition.--For purposes of this section the term ``political 
appointee'' means any individual who--
            (1) is employed in a position on the executive schedule 
        under sections 5312 through 5316 of title 5, United States 
        Code;
            (2) is a limited term appointee, limited emergency 
        appointee, or noncareer appointee in the senior executive 
        service as defined under section 3132(a) (5), (6), and (7) of 
        title 5, United States Code, respectively; or
            (3) is employed in a position in the executive branch of 
        the Government of a confidential or policy-determining 
        character under Schedule C of subpart C of part 213 of title 5 
        of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    (b) Limitation.--The President, acting through the Office of 
Management and Budget and the Office of Personnel Management, shall 
take such actions as necessary (including reduction in force actions 
under procedures established under section 3595 of title 5, United 
States Code) to ensure that the total number of political appointees 
shall not exceed 2,000.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on October 1, 
1996.
                                 <all>
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: byrne@mail.usf.edu [mailto:byrne@mail.usf.edu] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:48 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Marc Byrne 

1830 Ohio Avenue NE 

St. Petersburg, FL 33703
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 24, 1995 (72), Para 72.19 Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance]
[Page 815]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.72.19  board of directors of the office of compliance

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. FOX, announced that pursuant to the 
provisions of section 301 of Public Law 104-1, the Speaker and Minority 
Leader of the House of Representatives and the Majority and Minority 
Leaders of the United States Senate their joint appointment of the 
following individuals:

  Mr. Glen D. Nager of Washington, DC, chairman, to a 5-year term;
  Ms. Virginia A. Seitz of Washington, DC, to a 5-year term;
  Mr. Jerry M. Hunter of Missouri, to a 4-year term;
  Mr. James N. Adler of California, to a 4-year term; and
  Mr. Lawrence Z. Lorber of Washington, DC, to a 3-year term.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: annieo503@aol.com [mailto:annieo503@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:10 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Anne O'Farrell-DeVoe 

83 E. Lakeview Ave 

Columbus, OH 43202
From: LKatzin@msn.com [mailto:LKatzin@msn.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:03 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lori Katzin 

831 Diamond St 

Medford, OR 97501
Motion Granted, Appeal Dismissed, and Memorandum Opinion filed January

13, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00464-CV

ELITE POWER, LLC AND BRANDON MICHAEL MARTIN, Appellants

V.

MOTH MANAGEMENT, INC. AND EADO INVESTMENTS, L.P., 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-86771

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a final judgment signed May 17, 2021. On January 5, 

2022, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal “with prejudice.” The 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure speak only of a dismissal of an appeal; neither 

“with prejudice” nor “without prejudice” is appended to the word “dismissal”. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. We construe the motion as one for voluntary dismissal under 
2

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1). So construed, the motion is granted, 

and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6728

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HENRY CLIFFORD BYRD, SR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 98-6828

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HENRY CLIFFORD BYRD, SR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 98-6935

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,
2

versus

HENRY CLIFFORD BYRD, SR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-83-52, CA-98-62-1, CA-97-1047-1)

Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Henry Clifford Byrd, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

In Nos. 98-6728 and 98-6828, Henry Clifford Byrd, Sr., appeals

the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his

motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). In

No. 98-6935, Byrd appeals from the district court’s order denying

his “motion for due process.” Our review of the record and the

district court’s opinions discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appealability and dismiss in appeal

Nos. 98-6728 and 98-6828, and affirm in no. 98-6935, on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Byrd, Nos. CR-83-52;

CA-97-1047-1; CA-98-62-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 24, May 28 & June 11,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART
§ 219.701 Standards for drug and alcohol testing. ( a ) Drug testing required or authorized by subparts B, D, E, F, G, and K (but only for co-worker or non-peer referrals that involve a violation of the prohibitions of this subpart) of this part must be conducted in compliance with all applicable provisions of the Department of Transportation Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs (part 40 of this title).
( b ) Alcohol testing required or authorized by subparts B, D, E, F, G, and K (but only for co-worker or non-peer referrals that involve a violation of the prohibitions of this subpart) of this part must be conducted in compliance with all applicable provisions of the Department of Transportation Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs (part 40 of this title).
[66 FR 41973, Aug. 9, 2001, as amended at 81 FR 37942, June 10, 2016]
From: g_swanberg@hotmail.com [mailto:g_swanberg@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:58 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Gabrielle Swanberg 

1649 Lancaster Dr 

Petaluma, CA 94954
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2821

CALVIN CHILDS-BEY, Individually and on behalf

of himself,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MIKE BICKMEYER, Individually and in his official capacity as "Assistant Director"; SCOTT

MEESE, Individually and in his official capacity as "Purchasing Manager"; BRENDA J. KEITH,

Individually and in her official capacity as

"Director of Nutrition Services" of Marriott

Corporation; MARRIOTT CORPORATION, in its

official capacity as a "Municipal Corporation"

Health Care Services,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-95-608-B)

Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 22, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
1 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e)-16 (1994).

2 42 U.S.C. § 12101-12132 (1994).

2

Calvin Childs-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Michael Topolski,

MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary

judgment in a discrimination case filed under the Civil Rights Act

of 1964 (Title VII);1 the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA);2

42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986 (1994); and various state laws. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Childs-Bey v. Bickmeyer, No. CA-95-608-B (D. Md.

Nov. 21, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
From: imf_cutie@hotmail.com [mailto:imf_cutie@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:59 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Asura Yu 

1320 Juniper St. 

Golden, CO 80401
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.567 Which pipelines must have test leads and what must I do to install and maintain the leads? ( a ) *General.* Except for offshore pipelines, each buried or submerged pipeline or segment of pipeline under cathodic protection required by this subpart must have electrical test leads for external corrosion control. However, this requirement does not apply until December 27, 2004 to pipelines or pipeline segments on which test leads were not required by regulations in effect before January 28, 2002.
( b ) *Installation.* You must install test leads as follows: ( 1 ) Locate the leads at intervals frequent enough to obtain electrical measurements indicating the adequacy of cathodic protection.
( 2 ) Provide enough looping or slack so backfilling will not unduly stress or break the lead and the lead will otherwise remain mechanically secure and electrically conductive.
( 3 ) Prevent lead attachments from causing stress concentrations on pipe.
( 4 ) For leads installed in conduits, suitably insulate the lead from the conduit.
( 5 ) At the connection to the pipeline, coat each bared test lead wire and bared metallic area with an electrical insulating material compatible with the pipe coating and the insulation on the wire.
( c ) *Maintenance.* You must maintain the test lead wires in a condition that enables you to obtain electrical measurements to determine whether cathodic protection complies with § 195.571.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 10, 1995 (91), Para 91.11 Sikes Act Improvement]
[Page 1096]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.91.11  sikes act improvement

  Mr. YOUNG of Alaska moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 
1141) to amend the Act popularly known as the ``Sikes Act'' to enhance 
fish and wildlife conservation and natural resources management 
programs; as amended.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, recognized Mr. YOUNG of Alaska and 
Mr. STUDDS, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill, as amended?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  Mr. STUDDS objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced that further proceedings on the motion were postponed.
  The point of no quorum was considered as withdrawn.
```
§ 218.127 Specific freight train exceptions to crew size safety requirements. The requirements in this subpart are not applicable to the following freight train operations that are operated with a one-person train crew: ( a ) *Mine load out, plant dumping, or similar operation exception.* A unit freight train: ( 1 ) Being loaded or unloaded in an assembly line manner;
( 2 ) Located on a track that is temporarily made inaccessible from the general railroad system of transportation;
( 3 ) Moving at a maximum authorized speed of 10 miles per hour or less;
( 4 ) Not requiring the one-person train crewmember to operate a hand-operated switch, fill out paperwork, or call signal indications during the loading or unloading process; and
( 5 ) If the operation is overseen by another person, typically in a tower or on the ground, requiring that person to have the capability of communicating with the one-person train crewmember operating the train.
( b ) [Reserved]
```

[Federal Register: November 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 216)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 68704]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr09no10-13]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary

43 CFR Part 4

RIN 1094-AA53

 
Interior Board of Land Appeals and Other Appeals Procedures

Correction

    In rule document 2010-26200 beginning on page 64655 in the issue of 
Wednesday, October 20, 2010 make the following correction:

Sec.  4.400  [Corrected]

    On page 64664, in Sec.  4.400, in the second column, in the first 
and second lines, ``provided in the Bureau decision under appeal'' 
should read ``provided in the Bureau or Office decision under appeal.''

[FR Doc. C1-2010-26200 Filed 11-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Champion
Industries, Inc. of our report dated December 18, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Champion Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
for the year ended October 31, 1998.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan (Form S-8, No. 33-76790) of Champion
Industries, Inc. of our report dated December 18, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Champion Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 31, 1998.


                                               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Charleston, West Virginia
January 25, 1999


                                      219
-----Original Message----- 

From: csamp@triton.edu [mailto:csamp@triton.edu] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:24 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Cecelia Samp 

4265 Emerson Ave. 

Schiller Park, IL 60176
Exhibit
23
 
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-49577
and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration No. 33-52759 of AEP Texas
Central Company on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 28, 2005 (which
reports express unqualified opinions and include an explanatory paragraph
concerning the adoption of new accounting pronouncements in 2003 and 2004)
relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules of AEP
Texas Central Company appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of AEP Texas Central Company for the year ended December 31,
2004.
  
 /s/
Deloitte & Touche, LLP
 
 Columbus,
Ohio
 March 1,
2005
`[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, September 19, 1995 (117), Para 117.16 H.R. 558--Unfinished Business]
[Page 1377]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.117.16  h.r. 558--unfinished business

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. FOLEY, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced the further unfinished business to be the motion to suspend 
the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 558) to grant the consent of the 
Congress to the Texas Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Compact.
  The question being put,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill?
  The vote was taken by electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

176

<3-line {>

negative

Nays

243`
Exhibit 10.2

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE

CLOUD PEAK ENERGY RESOURCES LLC DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

 

WHEREAS, Cloud Peak Energy Resources LLC (the “Company”), a Delaware limited liability company, adopted the Cloud Peak Energy Resources LLC Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), effective as of March 18, 2011, and adopted the First Amendment to the Plan effective January 1, 2012; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company has the ability to amend the Plan pursuant to Section 8.1; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the definition of “Retirement” in the Plan which has the effect of expanding the circumstances under which a Participant will be entitled to an installment form of distribution under the Plan.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan in the following respects, effective as of January 1, 2014:

 

1.              Section 1.24 of the Plan is amended by adding the following at the end of said Section:

 

Effective for Company Contributions and Participant deferrals of Compensation on and after January 1, 2014, “Retirement” means Termination of Service after having attained age 55 and completed at least 10 Years of Service, or at age 65 or older.

 

2.              Section 5.2 is amended to delete the last sentence, such that Section 5.2 reads in full as follows:

 

5.2                               Termination Distributions.  Except as provided in Section 5.4, in the event of a Participant’s Termination of Service other than by reason of Retirement, death or Disability, the Distributable Amount credited to the Participant Deferral Accounts shall be paid in a lump sum in cash, an annuity contract or other property on the Payment Date following Termination of Service.

 

3.              In all other respects, the terms of this Plan are hereby ratified and confirmed.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Second Amendment to be executed as of the date indicated below.

 

	
 
    	
CLOUD PEAK ENERGY RESOURCES LLC
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/ Cary W. Martin
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Cary W. Martin, SVP — Human Resources
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Date:
    	
10/4/13
    


 

Prepared by Holland & Hart LLP

 

1