alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 24.8
                      POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned, as President and Chief Executive Officer of
Public  Service Company of Oklahoma (the "Company"),  hereby
makes,  constitutes and appoints R. Russell Davis  his  true
and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power and
authority  to  execute  in the name and  on  behalf  of  the
undersigned, in any and all capacities, the Company's Annual
Report  on  Form  10-K for 1995 and any and  all  amendments
thereto,  to be filed under the Securities Exchange  Act  of
1934,  as  amended, and any other documents and  instruments
incidental thereto, and to file the same, with all  exhibits
thereto and all documents in connection therewith, with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby granting to  such
attorney-in-fact, and agents, full power  and  authority  of
substitution and revocation in the premises and  full  power
and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite  and  necessary  to  be  done  in  and  about  the
premises,  as  fully  for all intents and  purposes  as  the
undersigned might or could do in person and hereby ratifying
and  confirming all that such attorneys-in-fact and  agents,
may  do  or  cause  to be done by virtue of  this  Power  of
Attorney.

IN  WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto executed this Power  of
Attorney this 16th day of January, 1996.



                              Robert L. Zemanek






Subscribed and sworn to before me this 16th day of  January,
1996 by Robert L. Zemanek.

                              Lina P. Holm
                              Notary Public

My Commission Expires:
January 28, 1999
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.581 Which pipelines must I protect against atmospheric corrosion and what coating material may I use? ( a ) You must clean and coat each pipeline or portion of pipeline that is exposed to the atmosphere, except pipelines under paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) Coating material must be suitable for the prevention of atmospheric corrosion.
( c ) Except portions of pipelines in offshore splash zones or soil-to-air interfaces, you need not protect against atmospheric corrosion any pipeline for which you demonstrate by test, investigation, or experience appropriate to the environment of the pipeline that corrosion will— ( 1 ) Only be a light surface oxide; or
( 2 ) Not affect the safe operation of the pipeline before the next scheduled inspection.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, June 29, 1995 (89), Para 89.17 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 1944]
[Page 1081]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.89.17  providing for the consideration of h.r. 1944

  Mr. DREIER, by direction of the Committee on Rules, called up the 
following resolution (H. Res. 176):

       Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 
     shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 
     1944) making emergency supplemental appropriations for 
     additional disaster assistance, for anti-terrorism 
     initiatives, for assistance in the recovery from the tragedy 
     that occurred at Oklahoma City, and making rescissions for 
     the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other 
     purposes. It shall be in order, any rule of the House to the 
     contrary notwithstanding, to consider an amendment offered by 
     the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations. That 
     amendment (if offered) shall be considered as read and shall 
     not be subject to a demand for division of the question. The 
     previous question shall be considered as ordered on that 
     amendment (if offered) and on the bill to final passage 
     without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 
     equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
     minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) 
     one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

  When said resolution was considered.
  After debate,
  Mr. DREIER moved the previous question on the resolution to its 
adoption or rejection.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House now order the previous question?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. INGLIS, announced that the yeas had it.
  Mr. BEILENSON objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  A quorum not being present,
  The roll was called under clause 4, rule XV, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

Yeas

236

When there appeared

Nays

194
```
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.107 Yield strength (*S*) for steel pipe. ( a ) For pipe that is manufactured in accordance with a specification listed in section I of appendix B of this part, the yield strength to be used in the design formula in § 192.105 is the SMYS stated in the listed specification, if that value is known.
( b ) For pipe that is manufactured in accordance with a specification not listed in section I of appendix B to this part or whose specification or tensile properties are unknown, the yield strength to be used in the design formula in § 192.105 is one of the following: ( 1 ) If the pipe is tensile tested in accordance with section II-D of appendix B to this part, the lower of the following: ( i ) 80 percent of the average yield strength determined by the tensile tests.
( ii ) The lowest yield strength determined by the tensile tests.
( 2 ) If the pipe is not tensile tested as provided in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, 24,000 p.s.i. (165 MPa).
[35 FR 13257, Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28783, June 6, 1996; Amdt. 192-83, 63 FR 7723, Feb. 17, 1998; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37502, July 13, 1998]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 31, 1995 (105), Para 105.15 VA--HUD Appropriation, FY 1996]
[Page 1226]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.105.15  va--hud appropriation, fy 1996

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. WHITFIELD, pursuant to House Resolution 
201 and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of 
the Whole House on the state of the Union for the further consideration 
of the bill (H.R. 2099) making appropriations for the Departments of 
Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and for sundry 
independent agencies, boards, commissions, corporations, and offices for 
fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes.
  Mr. COMBEST, Chairman of the Committee of the Whole, resumed the 
chair; and after some time spent therein,
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. PORTER, assumed the Chair.
  When Mr. COMBEST, Chairman, reported that the Committee, having had 
under consideration said bill, had come to no resolution thereon.
```
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON DC ) WILLIAM ALFRED HICKS, 

### .JR., ) Complainant )


### v. CITY OF MOUNT AIRY and SURRY COUNTY through MOUNT AIRYI SURRY COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Respondents. ) FAA Docket No. 16-15-07

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME This matter is before the Federal Aviat ion Administra tion (FAA) based on the above

referenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for FederallyAssisted AirportEnforcement Proceedings , 14 CFR Part 16
. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, the date by which tihe Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to April 4, 2016
. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.

Acting Director, Airport Compliance

and Management Analysis

# J/2};~ DateCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on March 3, 2016, I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class, postage paid) or personally delivered a true copy ofthe foregoing ORDER addressed to: Counsel for Complainant Randolph M. James Randolph M. James, P
.C
. P.O. Box 20069 Winston-Salem, NC 27 120 Counsel for Respondents Howard C. Jones 

### II I 05 W 4th St Suite 400-E Winston

- Salem, NC 27101 Edwin M. Woltz Edwin M. Woltz Attorney at Law PLLC 119 Rawley Ave Mount Airy, NC 27030 Hugh 

### B. Campbell III Campbell Law Group, PLLC 235 E Independence Blvd PO Box 1846 Mount Airy, NC 27030 Hand-Delivered to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-600) FAA Office ofAirport Com pliance and Management Analysis (AC0-100)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i), announcement is made of the intent to grant an exclusive, royalty-bearing, revocable license within the geographic area of the United States of America and its territories and possessions to U.S. Patent application 11/229,425, filed September 16, 2005 entitled “Artillery Rocket Trajectory Correction Kit,” to Diehl BGT Defense GmbH & Co. KG with its principal place of business at Massberg Facility Alte Nussdorfer Strausse 13 88662 Uberlingen, Germany.

# ADDRESSES:

Commander, U.S. Army Research Development and Engineering Command, ATTN: AMSRD-AMR-AS-PT-TR, Bldg. 5400, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898-5000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Russ Alexander, Officer of Research & Technology Applications, (256) 876-8743.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Artillery Rocket Trajectory Correction Kit (TCK) is a completely self-contained retrofit kit that is externally and fixedly mounted as an add-on to the rear (aft of the tailfins) of an existing, unguided rocket. The TCK continuously measures the pitch and yaw of the rocket during the initial seconds of the flight as it is released from the launch tube. A trajectory correction is calculated to allow the rocket to stay on a desired path. Selected thrusters are then activated to make any necessary flight correction. The thrusters are positioned around the circumference of the rocket body so as to correctively steer the rocket. Thus, rocket accuracy is improved and collateral damage is reduced.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-3537 Filed 7-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
-----Original Message----- 

From: hemdahsh@sbcglobal.net [mailto:hemdahsh@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:11 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Hemdah Salonimer-Horner 

1032 T.C. Lea Rd 

Independence, MO 64050
From: marksalamon@aol.com [mailto:marksalamon@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:47 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

MARK SALAMON 

851 VIEWRIDGE DRIVE 

SAN MATEO, CA 94403
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           22169
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            3382
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     186952
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           19652
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             19732
<LOANS>                                         485022
<ALLOWANCE>                                       3932
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  753397
<DEPOSITS>                                      537675
<SHORT-TERM>                                     50576
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               6133
<LONG-TERM>                                     108501
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         44545
<OTHER-SE>                                        5967
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  753397
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  20374
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 7032
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   159
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 27565
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               11007
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               15822
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            11743
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     4202
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (189)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   8974
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1146
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1146
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1510
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.99
<LOANS-NON>                                       1865
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   273
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  3908
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     4235
<RECOVERIES>                                        57
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 3932
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              2738
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           1194


</TABLE>
EX 11.1


             CHESAPEAKE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
           for the three years ended December 31, 1999

       (Amounts in millions, except for per share amounts)


                                         1999     1998     1997
                                         ----      ----    ----
Basic:
   Weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding                  20.1      21.2    23.1
                                       ======    ======  ======
   Income before extraordinary item    $250.8    $ 34.0  $ 50.9
   Extraordinary item                       -      13.3    (2.3)
                                       ------    ------  ------
     Net income                        $250.8    $ 47.3  $ 48.6
                                       ======    ======  ======
Per share amount:
   Earnings before extraordinary item  $12.48    $ 1.60  $ 2.20
   Extraordinary item                       -       .63    (.10)
                                       ------    ------  ------
                                       $12.48    $ 2.23  $ 2.10
                                       ======    ======  ======
Diluted:
   Weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding                  20.1      21.2    23.1
   Net additional common shares
     issuable upon exercise of
     dilutive options, determined
     by treasury stock method using
     the average price                     .3        .4      .3
                                       ------    ------  ------
   Common shares, equivalents, and
     other potentially dilutive
     securities                          20.4      21.6    23.4
                                       ======    ======  ======
   Income before extraordinary item    $250.8    $ 34.0  $ 50.9
   Extraordinary item                       -      13.3    (2.3)
                                       ------    ------  ------
     Net income                        $250.8    $ 47.3  $ 48.6
                                       ======    ======  ======
   Per share amount:
     Earnings before extraordinary
       item                            $12.29    $ 1.57  $ 2.18
     Extraordinary item                     -       .62    (.10)
                                       ------    ------  ------
     Earnings                          $12.29    $ 2.19  $ 2.08
                                       ======    ======  ======


                               -1-
Exhibit 32.1

# Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections
1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certify as follows:

|1. | Patrick J. Mitchell is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
               Ascent Assurance, Inc. (the Company).
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | Cynthia B. Koenig is the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
               the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. | To the best of our knowledge:
|-- | -----------------------------

| | (A) | The Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003
               accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and
               Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
               requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
               (the Exchange Act); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (B) | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
               financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 12, 2003

| | /s/ Patrick J. Mitchell                                              
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Patrick J. Mitchell
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer

| | /s/ Cynthia B. Koenig                                              
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Cynthia B. Koenig
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7300
KENNY DREW SAYRE, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WAYNE L. GODWIN, Sheriff; ROBERT LINVILLE, Chief Jailer; CARMINE J. CANN, Commissioner; EDGAR C. SIEGR IST, Commissioner; JAMES A. VARNER, Commissioner, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-148-1) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 11, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenny Drew Sayre, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a West Virginia inmate, appeals the districtcourt's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Sayre v. Godwin , No. CA-97-148-l (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED