alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OVER 2005

2007

Buying Contacts Online

Buying contact lenses on the 

Internet, by phone, or by mail can 

be handy. But buyers should be 

careful.

You need an up-to-date, correct 

prescription. Your state laws decide 

when a prescription expires. It may 

be one or two years. Some states 

leave it to your doctor to decide.

The prescription should include:

• Your name

• Lens measurements

• The contact lens brand and 

material

• Your doctor’s name

Some prescriptions also include:

• Whether lenses are for daily wear 

or extended wear

• Whether a different kind of lens 

material can be used

• The date your prescription expires

• The number of refills

Internet sites and mail-order 

companies must get your doctor’s 

approval of the prescription. If 

they don’t, they are breaking 

federal law. That’s why many ask 

for your doctor’s name and phone 

number. Some states need written 

prescriptions.

Order your lenses from a company 

you know you can trust.

Ask for written information about 

your contact lenses from the 

company. It should tell you how to 

use the lenses, and tell you about 

the risks and benefits.

Don’t take a chance on using an 

old prescription

Ask your eye doctor how often you 

should have check-ups. See the 

doctor regularly. The check-ups 

give your doctor a chance to check 

the fit of your lenses and change 

your prescription as your eyes 

change. Lenses that don’t fit can 

hurt your eyes.

Always contact your doctor for 

advice. A doctor can see early signs 

of damage that can lead to serious 

problems, even blindness. You may 

not notice these signs in their early 

stages.
FDA Office of Women’s Health http://www.fda.gov/womens

TAKE TIME TO CARE... For yourself, for those who need you.

Make sure you get what you asked 

for

Watch out! Some online or mailorder sellers may send you a 

different brand. Contact lenses may 

look the same, but materials and 

shapes change by brand. Be sure 

you get what you asked for. Make 

sure that the company gives you 

this information:

• Brand name

• Lens name

• Power

o Sphere

o Cylinder, if any

o Axis, if any

• Diameter

• Base curve

• Peripheral curves, if any

To Learn More:

FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Phone: 1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332)

http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/contactlenses/buying.html

Always contact your doctor for medical advice.

Buying Contacts Online
# EUR-Lex - 52003XC0307(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52003XC0307(01)

**Amendment by France of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services within France (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal C 053 , 07/03/2003 P. 0004 - 0004 *

Amendment by France of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services within France

(2003/C 53/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

1. France has decided to alter the public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services between St Brieuc and Paris (Orly), published in Official Journal of the European Communities C 23 of 28 January 1999 pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes.

2. The public service obligations are now as follows:

Minimum frequency

The minimum level of service provided must be one return trip per day, from Monday to Friday, except on public holidays and during holiday periods, 225 days a year.

Type of aircraft used and capacity provided

The service must be operated with a pressurised turboprop aircraft having a seating capacity of at least 19 which is suited to conditions at the airport.

Should the minimum seating capacity prove to be clearly out of proportion to the actual uptake of seats, it may be adjusted following publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of a notice amending these public service obligations.

Timetables

Slots have been reserved at Paris (Orly) airport for the Paris (Orly) - St Brieuc-Armor scheduled air service pursuant to Article 9 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 of 18 January 1993 on common rules for the allocation of slots at Community airports. Air carriers interested in this route can obtain further information from the Paris airports coordinator.

Flight bookings

Flights must be marketed by means of at least one computerised reservation system.

Continuity of service

Except in cases of force majeure, the number of flights cancelled for reasons directly attributable to the carrier must not exceed 3 % of the number of flights scheduled in any year.

Community carriers are hereby informed that the operation of air services without regard to these public service obligations may result in administrative and/or criminal penalties.

3. These public service obligations replace those set out in the Commission notice published in Official Journal of the European Communities C 23 of 28 January 1999.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AVONDALE
INDUSTRIES, INC.'S ANNUAL REPORT FILED ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          38,524
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   93,184
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     15,289
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               173,593
<PP&E>                                         251,699
<DEPRECIATION>                               (121,661)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 316,727
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,605
<BONDS>                                         58,593
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,927
<OTHER-SE>                                     135,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   316,727
<SALES>                                        576,308
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               576,308
<CGS>                                          517,637
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  517,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,780
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,400)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,180
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,180
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.95
        

</TABLE>
#### CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC LAMP COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. James P. MITCHELL, Secretary of Labor, Appellee, International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, Appellee-Intervenor.

No. 14142.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 20, 1958.

Decided Sept. 18, 1958.

Mr. Gerard D. Reilly, Washington, D. C. , for appellants. Mr. Paul M. Rhodes, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellants.

Mr. Donald B. MacGuineas, Attorney, Department of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. George C. Doub, Mr. Paul A. Sweeney, Attorney, Department of Justice, and Miss Bessie Margolin, Assistant Solicitor, United States Department of Labor, were on the brief, for appellee Mitchell.

Mr. Benjamin C. Sigal, Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for appel-lee-intervenor.

Before V/ashington, Danaher and Bastían, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case, which is similar in nature to Mitchell v. Covington Mills, 97 U.S.App. D.C. 165, 229 F.2d 506, certiorari denied 1955, 350 U.S. 1002, 76 S.Ct. 546, 100 L.Ed. 865, rehearing denied 1956, 351 U. S. 934, 76 S.Ct. 787, 100 L.Ed. 1462, involves an industry-wide wage determination under the Walsh-Healey Act, 41 U. S.C.A. § 35(b), for the electric lamp industry. We think the principal issue here — the validity of the determination — is governed by the decision in Covington Mills, and we therefore uphold the determination, on the facts revealed by the record before us. We have considered all the points urged by appellants, but find no reversible error. The action of the District Court in granting summary judgment for the ap-pellee Mitchell is therefore

Affirmed.
Attachment E 

USFWS Concurrence Letter Dated August 7, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 193
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

§ 193.2623 Inspecting LNG storage tanks. Each LNG storage tank must be inspected or tested to verify that each of the following conditions does not impair the structural integrity or safety of the tank: ( a ) Foundation and tank movement during normal operation and after a major meteorological or geophysical disturbance.
( b ) Inner tank leakage.
( c ) Effectiveness of insulation.
( d ) Frost heave.
[Amdt. 193-2, 45 FR 70407, Oct. 23, 1980, as amended at 47 FR 32720, July 29, 1982]
#### Charles T. Goodwin, *Executor, etc.,*and Amelia P. Ingraham, *Executrix, etc., Respondents, v.*George E. Ingraham and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dyicman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., dissenting.
#### Christian F. A. Dambmann, *Appellant, v.*Herman Schulting, *Respondent.*

— Order reversed, without costs Opinion by

Brady, J.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7


                                  AMENDMENT TO
                           THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED
                         MANAGEMENT RETENTION AGREEMENT
                      (SPECIFIC TO CERTAIN TIER 2 OFFICERS)



                  This Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Management
Retention Agreement between Caliber System, Inc. (the "Company") and X (the
"Executive") is entered into this 4th day of October, 1997.

                  WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into a Third
Amended and Restated Management Retention Agreement on August 28, 1997 (the
"Agreement");

                  WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Agreement; and

                  WHEREAS, the Executive agrees to amend the Agreement.

                  NOW THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive agree as follows:

                  Section 3(a)(4) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety
                  and Section 3(a)(5) is redesignated as Section 3(a)(4).

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to
be executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company. Executive has executed
this Amendment as of the date and year first written above.

                                                CALIBER SYSTEM, INC.



                                                By:
                                                   -----------------------------


Agreed to this 4th day of October, 1997.




---------------------------
[Executive's Name]
From: kbachmann@cox.net [mailto:kbachmann@cox.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:51 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kurt Bachmann 

3401 Glisten St 

Norman, OK 73072
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2111 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2111

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To designate the Federal building located at 1221 Nevin Avenue in 
     Richmond, California, as the ``Frank Hagel Federal Building''.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2111

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the Federal building located at 1221 Nevin Avenue in 
     Richmond, California, as the ``Frank Hagel Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 1221 Nevin Avenue in Richmond, 
California, shall be known and designated as the ``Frank Hagel Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Frank Hagel 
Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 18 
      (legislative day, December 15, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: rhettlawrence@yahoo.com [mailto:rhettlawrence@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:28 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Rhett Lawrence 

6445 N Commercial Ave 

Portland, OR 97217
#### BENJAMIN GRIFFEY and ARID PARDEE, Respondents, *v.*THE NEW YORK CENTRAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

*Policy of inwrance*— prohibition *against its assignment by the holder*— when *such pi'ohibiiion does not include its assignment as a collateral security.*

Motion by the defendant for a new trial on exceptions, ordered -to be heard in the first instance at the General Term, after a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiffs.

The action was brought on a policy of fire insurance for $1,500.

The court at General Term said: “ The only other question arises upon a provision of the policy that ‘ if this policy shall be assigned before a loss, without the consent of the company indorsed thereon, * '* * the policy shall be void.’. The plaintiffs transferred the policy in suit, with others, amounting in all to $16,000, to the *300Lewisburgh National Bank as collateral security for claims held by said bank against the plaintiffs. It will be observed that the policy does not prohibit a transfer of the policy, or *(my interest*therein; in other words, the condition is aimed only at a transfer which deprives the assumed of *all*interest in the policy. The assignment in this case merely created a lien for the security of a debt, and the entire interest remained in the assignors, subject to the lien or pledge. "We are inclined to think that the prohibition should be construed strictly, and that it does not apply to a mere pledge of the policy. *(See Lazarus*v. *Commonwealth Ins. Co.,*5 Pick., 80; *Filis v.Krentzwan, 21*.Mo., 311; *Washington Fire Ins. Co.*v. *Kelly,*32 Md,, 421; S. 0., 5 Bennett’s Fire Ins. Cases, 302; Wood on Insurance, § 339.) ” ,

*Reynolds c& Collin,*for the plaintiffs.

*W. E. Hughitt,*for the defendant.'

Opinión by

Smith, P. J. ;•

Hardin and Haight, JJ., concurred.

New trial denied and judgment ordered for plaintiffs on the verdict.
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

I certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Annual Report on Form 10-K of LabOne, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LabOne, Inc.

 

LabOne, Inc.

Date:  March 15, 2005
By  /s/ *John W. McCarty*
Exhibit 24

                                          February 17, 1999



      I, Steven V. Lant,  Corporate  Secretary of Central  Hudson Gas & Electric
Corporation,  hereby  certify  that at the meeting of the Board of  Directors of
Central Hudson Gas & Electric  Corporation,  a corporation  organized  under the
laws of the  State of New  York,  duly  called  and held at the  office  of said
Corporation,  284 South Avenue, in the City of Poughkeepsie,  State of New York,
on January 29, 1999,  at which a quorum was present and voting  throughout,  the
following  resolution was  unanimously and duly adopted and is now in full force
and effect:

                  RESOLVED,  that  the  Annual  Report  to  the  Securities  and
            Exchange  Commission,  on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31,
            1998, in the form presented to this meeting,  be and the same hereby
            is in all respects approved;  and that the Chairman of the Board and
            the officers of this  Corporation  be and they hereby are authorized
            in the name  and on  behalf  of this  Board  of  Directors  and this
            Corporation to execute said Form 10-K Report,  in the form presented
            to this  meeting,  and  that  the  officers  and  Directors  of this
            Corporation  be and they hereby are requested and authorized to join
            in the execution of said Form 10-K Report,  and that the Chairman of
            the Board and the  officers of this  Corporation  be and they hereby
            are authorized and directed to file or cause to be filed as required
            or  permitted  by law said  Form  10-K,  together  with  appropriate
            Exhibits,  as  required  in  connection  therewith,  subject to such
            changes  therein as the  Chairman  of the Board and the  officers of
            this  Corporation,   advised  by  counsel,  may  deem  necessary  or
            appropriate  to comply with the  requirements  of the Securities and
            Exchange  Commission;  and to do and  cause  to be done  any and all
            things  necessary or  appropriate  to effect the filing of said Form
            10-K and any amendments thereto.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand as Corporate  Secretary of
Central  Hudson Gas & Electric  Corporation  and affixed its corporate seal this
17th day of February, 1999.



                                    /s/     Steven V. Lant
                                   ____________________________________

                                            Steven V. Lant
                                          Corporate Secretary
#### § 199.100 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to establish programs designed to help prevent accidents and injuries resulting from the use of prohibited drugs by employees who perform covered functions for operators of certain pipeline facilities subject to part 192, 193, or 195 of this chapter.

[Amdt. 199-19, 66 FR 47118, Sept. 11, 2001]
Exhibit 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Ben R. Leedle, Jr., certify that:
 
 1.           I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A of Healthways, Inc.; and
 
 2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
 
 Date:   June 12, 2012
 
 /s/ Ben R. Leedle, Jr.
 Ben R. Leedle, Jr.
 Chief Executive Officer
-----Original Message----- 

From: s_shelby_clark@hotmail.com [mailto:s_shelby_clark@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:50 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Susan Clark 

121 Fanwood Ct. 

Apex, NC 27502