alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Paulson Capital Corp., Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Carol A. Rice, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Carol A. Rice       |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Carol A. Rice           |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| August 12, 2004    |

 

----
§ 176.710 Care following leakage or sifting of radioactive materials. ( a ) In case of fire, collision, or breakage involving any shipment of radioactive materials, other than materials of low specific activity, the radioactive materials must be segregated from unnecessary contact with personnel. In case of obvious leakage, or if the inside container appears to be damaged, the stowage area (hold, compartment, or deck area) containing this cargo must be isolated as much as possible to prevent radioactive material from entering any person's body through contact, inhalation, or ingestion. No person may handle the material or remain in the vicinity unless supervised by a qualified person.
( b ) A hold or compartment in which leakage of radioactive materials has occurred may not be used for other cargo until it is decontaminated in accordance with the requirements of § 176.715.
( c ) For reporting requirements, see § 171.15 of this subchapter.
-----Original Message----- 

From: lsblpc@sbcglobal.net [mailto:lsblpc@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 7:56 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Linda Barone 

9C Hughes Place 

New Haven, CT 06511
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 7, 1995 (111), Para 111.8 Order of Business--Consideration of Amendments--H.R. 2126]
[Page 1310]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.111.8  order of business--consideration of amendments--h.r. 2126

  On motion of Mr. YOUNG of Florida, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That further consideration of the bill (H.R. 2126) making 
appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 1996, and for other purposes, in the Committee of the 
Whole, pursuant to House Resolution 205, shall be governed by the 
following:
  Before consideration of any other amendment it shall be in order to 
consider the following amendments (identified by their designation in 
the Congressional Record pursuant to clause 6 of rule XXIII), each of 
which may be considered only in the order specified, may be offered only 
by the Member (or one of the Members) specified, may amend portions of 
the bill not yet read for amendment, may amend portions of the bill 
previously amended, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable as 
specified, shall not be subject to amendment except as specified, shall 
not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or 
in the Committee of the Whole, and shall not otherwise be in order 
during further consideration of the bill for amendment:
  (a) one of the amendments numbered 10, 11, 18, 34, or 56, by Mr. 
Kasich or Mr. Obey, to be debatable for 60 minutes, with 10 minutes 
controlled by Mr. Kasich, 10 minutes controlled by Mr. Dellums, 10 
minutes controlled by Mr. Obey, 15 minutes controlled by Mr. Dicks, and 
15 minutes controlled by Mr. Young of Florida;
  (b) one or more of the amendments numbered 37, 58, 59, or 61, by Mr. 
Obey, to be debatable in the aggregate for not more than 20 minutes, 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and
  (c) one of the amendments numbered 3 or 15, by Mr. Dornan, together 
with the amendment numbered 48 as a subsitute therefor, by Ms. DeLauro, 
to be jointly debatable for 30 minutes, equally divided and controlled 
by Mr. Dornan and Ms. DeLauro.
```
**Exhibit No. 21.1**

 

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

 

    1.       Providential Capital, Inc.

              A wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company

 

    2.        Provimex, Inc.

A majority-owned (85%) subsidiary of the Company

 

    3.       Touchlink Communications, Inc.

A majority-owned (85%) subsidiary of the Company

 

    4.       Providential Energy Corporation.

A wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company

 

   5.

PHI Digital, Corp.

A wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company

 

6.

PhiLand Corporation

A majority-owned (85%) subsidiary of the Company

 

7.

Providential Vietnam Growth Fund

A Cayman Islands-based private equity fund

of which the Company is the General Partner.

 

8.

IndoChina Mining Corporation

A wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company

 

9.

Providential Vietnam

A wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company
EX-10.12



 Exhibit 10.12 

August 30, 2013 
 Gregg
Huber Alton 
 234 Pohlemus Ave. 
 Atherton, CA 94027 

 

	Re:	Position on the Board of Directors of Celladon Corporation 

 Dear Gregg: 

It is my sincere pleasure, on behalf of Celladon Corporation (“Celladon”), to offer you a position on the Board of Directors (the
“Board”) of Celladon, effective upon your formal acceptance of this offer by signing below. It is anticipated that you will serve as Chairman of the Nominating & Governance Committee and a member of the Compensation Committee of the
Board. 
 As compensation for your service on the Board, you will be granted a stock option under Celladon’s equity incentive plan to
purchase shares representing 0.10% of Celladon’s fully diluted common stock outstanding as of the date of grant. Subject to your continued service on the Board, the stock option will be granted on the date of the Board’s receipt and
approval of a 409A valuation of Celladon’s common stock as of September 30, 2013. The option would vest in equal annual installments over a three-year term commencing on the date of your acceptance of this offer, subject to your continued
service to the Company. 
 In addition, on and after the date of the underwriting agreement between Celladon and the underwriters managing
the initial public offering of Celladon’s common stock (the “IPO”), you would be entitled to receive the annual equity grants and cash fees provided to Celladon’s non-employee directors pursuant to Celladon’s non-employee
director compensation policy as in effect from time to time. Please note that should the IPO occur, the stock option described above will serve as your initial grant under Celladon’s non-employee director compensation policy, except that if the
stock option described above, after adjustment for any reverse stock split following the grant date, covers less shares than the initial grant under Celladon’s non-employee director compensation policy (20,000 shares), you will receive an
initial grant under Celladon’s non-employee director compensation policy at the time of the IPO in an amount necessary so that immediately after such second grant, you hold options to purchase an aggregate of 20,000 shares of Celladon’s
common stock. Celladon will also reimburse you for reasonable out-of-pocket travel expenses incurred in connection with your attendance at Board meetings. 

If the terms of this letter are acceptable to you and you agree to serve on Celladon’s Board, please sign and date this letter below and
return it to us via PDF or facsimile, retaining a copy for your records. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	/s/ Krisztina Zsebo
	Krisztina Zsebo, Ph.D.
	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
	Celladon Corporation


 Accepted and agreed: 
  

	
	 /s/ Gregg Huber Alton

	Gregg Huber Alton
	
	Date: 8/30/13
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2161

To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act of 1994

until October 1, 1995, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 1995

Mr. GILMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

AUGUST 2, 1995

The Committee on International Relations discharged; considered and passed

A BILL

To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act of 1994 until October 1, 1995, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 583(a) of the Foreign Re5 lations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995

6 (Public Law 103–236), as amended by Public Law 104–
2

•HR 2161 CDH

1 17, is amended by striking ‘‘August 15, 1995,’’ and insert2 ing ‘‘October 1, 1995,’’.

3 (b) CONSULTATION.—For purposes of any exercise of

4 the authority provided in section 583(a) of the Foreign

5 Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995

6 (Public Law 103–236) prior to August 16, 1995, the writ7 ten policy justification dated June 1, 1995, and submitted

8 to the Congress in accordance with section 583(b)(1) of

9 such Act, and the consultations associated with such policy

10 justification, shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements

11 of section 583(b)(1) of such Act.

Æ
§ 196.103 What must an excavator do to protect underground pipelines from excavation-related damage? Prior to and during excavation activity, the excavator must: ( a ) Use an available one-call system before excavating to notify operators of underground pipeline facilities of the timing and location of the intended excavation;
( b ) If underground pipelines exist in the area, wait for the pipeline operator to arrive at the excavation site and establish and mark the location of its underground pipeline facilities before excavating;
( c ) Excavate with proper regard for the marked location of pipelines an operator has established by taking all practicable steps to prevent excavation damage to the pipeline;
( d ) Make additional use of one-call as necessary to obtain locating and marking before excavating to ensure that underground pipelines are not damaged by excavation.
§ 191.11 Distribution system: Annual report. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each operator of a distribution pipeline system must submit an annual report for that system on DOT Form PHMSA F 7100.1-1. This report must be submitted each year, not later than March 15, for the preceding calendar year.
( b ) *Not required.* The annual report requirement in this section does not apply to a master meter system, a petroleum gas system that serves fewer than 100 customers from a single source, or an individual service line directly connected to a production pipeline or a gathering line other than a regulated gathering line as determined in § 192.8.
[75 FR 72905, Nov. 26, 2010, as amended at 86 FR 2237, Jan. 11, 2021]
[Carroll,

December, 1880.]

#### Thorne *& a. v.*Demeritt. Thorne, Watson *& a. v.*Demeritt.

Replevin, for leather. Facts found by a referee.

*Banfield*and Wheeler, for the plaintiffs.

*Eox, B. C.*Carter, and Hibbard, for the defendant.

Doe, C. J.

There is no error of law in the referee’s finding that Wolfeborough was the place of destination, and that no one was authorized by the purchaser of the leather to hold or stop it in Boston, or to dispose of it there in any other way than by forwarding it directly to its place of destination. In the first case, the plaintiffs prevail. *Inslee*v. *Lane,*57 N. H. 454 ; Benj. Sales, *s.*846. In the second case, the leather had come into the buyer’s possession; fraud is not a fact found by the referee; and the action cannot be maintained.

*Case discharged.*

Foster and Smith, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.
From: thepinkelephant@msn.com [mailto:thepinkelephant@msn.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:09 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Brandy Pass 

280 Island Avenue #1007 

Reno, NV 89501
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JULIUS L. ARNADE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2889

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed June 28, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota 

County; Charles E. Roberts, Judge.

Christopher E. Cosden, Fort Myers, for 

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and David Campbell and 

Pamela Cordova Papasov, Assistant 

Attorneys General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KELLY, KHOUZAM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
§ 214.315 Supervision and communication. ( a ) When an employer assigns a duty to a roadway worker that calls for that employee to foul a track, the employer shall provide the employee with an on-track safety job briefing that, at a minimum, includes the following: ( 1 ) Information on the means by which on-track safety is to be provided for each track identified to be fouled;
( 2 ) Instruction on each on-track safety procedure to be followed;
( 3 ) Information about any adjacent tracks, on-track safety for such tracks, if required by this subpart or deemed necessary by the roadway worker in charge, and identification of any roadway maintenance machines that will foul such tracks;
( 4 ) A discussion of the nature of the work to be performed and the characteristics of the work location to ensure compliance with this subpart; and
( 5 ) Information on the accessibility of the roadway worker in charge and alternative procedures in the event the roadway worker in charge is no longer accessible to the members of the roadway work group.
( b ) A job briefing for on-track safety shall be deemed complete only after the roadway worker(s) has acknowledged understanding of the on-track safety procedures and instructions presented.
( c ) Every roadway work group whose duties require fouling a track shall have one roadway worker in charge designated by the employer to provide on-track safety for all members of the group. The designated person shall be qualified under the rules of the railroad that conducts train operations on those tracks to provide the protection necessary for on-track safety of each individual in the group. The responsible person may be designated generally, or specifically for a particular work situation.
( d ) Before any member of a roadway work group fouls a track, the roadway worker in charge designated under paragraph (c) of this section shall inform each roadway worker of the on-track safety procedures to be used and followed during the performance of the work at that time and location. Each roadway worker shall again be so informed at any time the on-track safety procedures change during the work period. Such information shall be given to all roadway workers affected before the change is effective, except in cases of emergency. Any roadway workers who, because of an emergency, cannot be notified in advance shall be immediately warned to leave the fouling space and shall not return to the fouling space until on-track safety is re-established.
( e ) Each lone worker shall communicate at the beginning of each duty period with a supervisor or another designated employee to receive an on-track safety job briefing and to advise of his or her planned itinerary and the procedures that he or she intends to use for on-track safety. When communication channels are disabled, the job briefing shall be conducted as soon as possible after the beginning of the work period when communications are restored.
[61 FR 65976, Dec. 16, 1996, as amended at 76 FR 74614, Nov. 30, 2011; 81 FR 37885, June 10, 2016]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 13, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00528

- CV

IN RE John EBIN and Joyce O’Connor

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

On August 5, 2019, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and the real party in interest responded. After reviewing the petition, the response, and the record, we conclude relators are entitled to the relief requested in part. Accordingly, the pe tition for writ of mandamus is

CONDITIONALLY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(c).

The Honorable Rex Emerson is ORDERED to vacate his August 2, 2019 “Order on Defendant’s Motion to Strike the Testimony and Report of Derek Steiner.” The writ will issue only if we are notified that Judge Emerson has not complied within fifteen days from the date of this order. All other relief requested by relators is DENIED. The stay imposed on August 5, 2019

is LIFTED.

It is so ORDERED on Novem ber 13, 2019

.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of November, 2019

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Co urt

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 17365B, styled Joyce O ’ Connor and John C. Ebin v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company and Kimberly Schaeffer , pending in the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas, the Honorable Rex Emerson presiding.
H. R. 2111

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To designate the Federal building located at 1221 Nevin Avenue in Richmond,

California, as the ‘‘Frank Hagel Federal Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building located at 1221 Nevin Avenue in Richmond, California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Frank

Hagel Federal Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Frank

Hagel Federal Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 219.3 Application. ( a ) *General.* This part applies to all railroads and contractors, except as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section, and except for: ( 1 ) Railroads that operate only on track inside an installation that is not part of the general railroad system of transportation (*i.e.,* plant railroads, as defined in § 219.5);
( 2 ) Tourist, scenic, historic, or excursion operations that are not part of the general railroad system of transportation, as defined in § 219.5; or
( 3 ) Rapid transit operations in an urban area that are not connected to the general railroad system of transportation.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Small railroad exception.* ( 1 ) Subparts E, G, and K do not apply to small railroads, and a small railroad may not perform the Federal requirements authorized by those subparts. For purposes of this part, a small railroad means a railroad that: ( i ) Has a total of 15 or fewer employees who are covered by the hours of service laws at 49 U.S.C. 21103, 21104, or 21105, or who would be subject to the hours of service laws at 49 U.S.C. 21103, 21104, or 21105 if their services were performed in the United States; and
( ii ) Does not have joint operations, as defined in § 219.5, with another railroad that operates in the United States, except as necessary for purposes of interchange.
( 2 ) An employee performing only MOW or MECH activities, as defined in § 219.5, does not count towards a railroad's total number of covered employees for the purpose of determining whether it qualifies for the small railroad exception.
( 3 ) A contractor performing MOW or MECH activities exclusively for small railroads also qualifies for the small railroad exception (*i.e.,* is excepted from the requirements of subparts E, G, and K of this part). A contractor is not excepted if it performs MOW or MECH activities for at least one railroad that is required to be in full compliance with this part.
( 4 ) If a contractor is subject to all of part 219 because it performs regulated service for multiple railroads, not all of which qualify for the small railroad exception, the responsibility for ensuring that the contractor complies with subparts E and G of this part is shared between the contractor and any railroad using the contractor that does not qualify for the small railroad exception.
( d ) *Foreign railroad.* ( 1 ) This part does not apply to the operations of a foreign railroad that take place outside the United States. A foreign railroad is required to conduct post-accident toxicological testing or reasonable suspicion testing only for operations that occur within the United States.
( 2 ) Subparts F, G, and K of this part do not apply to an employee of a foreign railroad whose primary reporting point is outside the United States if that employee is: ( i ) Performing train or dispatching service on that portion of a rail line in the United States extending up to 10 route miles from the point that the line crosses into the United States from Canada or Mexico; or
( ii ) Performing signal service in the United States.
[81 FR 37922, June 10, 2016, as amended at 87 FR 5733, Feb. 2, 2022]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 27, 1995 (103), Para 103.34 Leave of Absence]
[Page 1213]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.103.34  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--
  To Mr. JOHNSTON of Florida, for today after 12:30 p.m. and balance of 
the week; and
  To Mr. YATES, for today after 8:00 p.m.
  And then,
```