alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta

Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 7
Federal Reserve Bank of: Chicago

## Filings received during the week ending November 5, 2011

|Filer                          | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------------ | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|BLUE GRASS BANCORPORATION, INC | 4c8* 3A1       | Blue Grass Bancorporation, Inc., Corning, Iowa,to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100% of Okey-Vernon First National Bank, Corning, Iowa.  Blue Grass Bancorporation, Inc. to acquire 1st Choice Agency, Corning, Iowa, and engage in insurance in small towns. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:11/21/2011    
|Newspaper:                     | Not available 
|Federal Register:              | 11/21/2011    
|FIRST MIDWEST BANK             | * 18C* Branch  | First Midwest Bank, Itasca, Illinois, to acquire certain assets and assume certain liabilities of four branches of Old National Bank, Evansville, Indiana, and thereby to establish a branch office at 2320 S. Route 59, Plainfield, Illinois.                             | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                     | Not available 
|Federal Register:              | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta

Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
From: remy.atkinson@gmail.com [mailto:remy.atkinson@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:57 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jeremy Atkinson 

709 W. 22nd St. Apt. 219 

Austin, TX 78705
EXHIBIT 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - II (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General Partner and
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of the
               operations of the Partnership.


              August 14, 2008                     /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
              ---------------                     ------------------------------
                  Date                            Joseph M. Jayson,
                                                  Individual General Partner and
                                                  Principal Financial Officer
AN EADS COMPANY AIRBUS S.A.S SOCI E T E PAR ACTIONS SIMPLIFI E E AU CAPITAL DE 2.704. 375 EUROS 383 474 814 R.C.S. T OULOUSE SIEGE SOCIAL : 1 ROND POINT MAURICE BELLONTE
31707 BLAGNAC CEDEX

- FRANCE PHONE +33 (0)5 61 93 33 33 FROM Stéphane FLORI

DATE 06 September 2010

PHONE + 33 5 67 19 18 60

FAX + 33 5 61 93 31 55

E

- MAIL stephane.flori@airbus.com

OUR REFERENCE M10034793

YOUR REFERENCE

1. FAA Mr. Robert Hettman Propulsion/ Mechanical Systems Branch, ANM

– 112, Transport Airpla ne Direct o rate, Aircraft Certif i cation Service, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057

– 3356 USA

AIRBUS REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF COMMENT PERIOD: DOCKET No. FAA

- 2010

- 0636, AIRPLANE AND ENGINE CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS IN SUPERCOOLED LARGE DROP, MIXED PHASE, AND ICE CRYSTAL ICING CONDITIONS AND DRAFT AC 25

- XX

- COMPLIANCE OF TRANSPORT CATEGORY AIRPLANES WITH CERTIFICATION REQUIR EMENTS FOR FLIGHT IN ICING CONDITIONS

Dear Mr. Hettman,

Airbus hereby requests a 6 0

- day extension of the comment period for the NPRM 10

- 10 Airplane and Engine Certification Requirements in Supe r cooled Large Drop, Mixed Phase, and I ce Crystal Icing Conditions and AC 25

- XX Compliance o f Transport Category Airplanes w ith Certification R equir e ments f or Flight i n Icing Conditions (D ocket N o. FAA

- 2010

- 0636).

Our review of the proposed documents shows that they deviate, for a number of points, from the recommendations that the ARAC Ice Protection Harmonization Working Group sent to the FAA. Airbus participated in this working group, w hose recommendations resulted from long and tho rough efforts towards an acceptable solution in this complex issue. In addition to this

, the new rules and guid ance material are complex and despite its best efforts to provide a comprehensive r esponse within the required deadline, Airbus needs more than the permitted time to review the m aterial and its consequences. An exte nsion of the comment period by 6 0 days would allow us to complete this necessary a sses s ment and offer meaningful co m ments and proposals to the FAA.

We thank you in advance for the attention that you will pay to this request.

Yours sincerely,

Philippe de Gouttes Head of Regulations & Policies Product Integrity Division
-----Original Message----- 

From: bretcecil@bretcecil.com [mailto:bretcecil@bretcecil.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:51 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Bret Cecil 

2010 Eddy St 

San Francisco, CA 94115
-----Original Message----- 

From: timothy@nebo.com [mailto:timothy@nebo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:55 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Timothy Lanners 

2317 S. 18th Avenue 

NORTH RIVERSIDE, IL 60546
###### Editorial Note on Part 195

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.551 What do the regulations in this subpart cover?

This subpart prescribes minimum requirements for protecting steel pipelines against corrosion.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 21

To amend section 3 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 to more

accurately determine the median income for Rockland County, New York,

for purposes of housing programs administered by the Secretary of

Housing and Urban Development.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. GILMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To amend section 3 of the United States Housing Act of

1937 to more accurately determine the median income

for Rockland County, New York, for purposes of housing

programs administered by the Secretary of Housing and

Urban Development.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF INCOME LIMITS.

4 That section 3(b)(2) of the United States Housing Act

5 of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437a(b)(2)) is amended—

6 (1) in the 4th sentence—
2

•HR 21 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘County’’ and inserting

2 ‘‘and Rockland Counties’’; and

3 (B) by inserting ‘‘each’’ before ‘‘such coun4 ty’’; and

5 (2) in the last sentence—

6 (A) by striking ‘‘County’’ the 1st place it

7 appears and inserting ‘‘or Rockland Counties’’;

8 and

9 (B) by striking ‘‘County’’ the 2d place it

10 appears and inserting ‘‘and Rockland Coun11 ties’’.

12 SEC. 2. REGULATIONS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.

13 The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development

14 shall issue regulations implementing the amendments

15 made by section 1 not later than the expiration of the 90-

16 day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this

17 Act. The regulations may not take effect until after Sep18 tember 30, 1994.

Æ
§ 1122.1 Definitions. ( a ) *Board-Initiated Investigation* means an investigation instituted by the Board pursuant to an Order of Investigation and conducted in accordance with Section 12 of the Surface Transportation Board Reauthorization Act of 2015, now incorporated and codified at 49 U.S.C. 11701.
( b ) *Formal Board Proceeding* means a public proceeding instituted by the Board pursuant to an Order to Show Cause after a Board-Initiated Investigation has been conducted.
( c ) *Investigating officer(s)* means the individual(s) designated by the Board in an Order of Investigation to conduct a Board-Initiated Investigation.
( d ) *Preliminary Fact-Finding* means an informal fact-gathering inquiry conducted by Board staff prior to the opening of a Board-Initiated Investigation.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 20, 1995 (118), Para 118.30 Subpoena]
[Page 1427]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.118.30  subpoena

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. KIM, laid before the House a 
communication, which was read as follows:

                                    Congress of the United States,

                                     House of Representatives,

                               Washington, DC, September 19, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     Speaker, House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Speaker: This is to formally notify you pursuant 
     to Rule L (50) of the Rules of the House that my office has 
     been served with a subpoena for testimony and the production 
     of documents by the Justice Court of the State of Arizona, in 
     and for the County of Pima in connection with a civil case.
       After consultation with the General Counsel, I have 
     determined that compliance is consistent with the privileges 
     of the House.
           Sincerely,
                                                        Jim Kolbe,
                                               Member of Congress.
```
§ 209.111 Informal response and assessment. ( a ) If a respondent elects to make an informal response to a notice of probable violation, respondent shall submit to the Chief Counsel such written explanations, information or other materials as respondent may desire in answer to the charges or in mitigation of the proposed penalty.
( b ) The respondent may include in his or her informal written response a request for a conference. Upon receipt of such a request, the Chief Counsel arranges for a conference as soon as practicable at a time and place of mutual convenience.
( c ) Written explanations, information or materials, submitted by the respondent and relevant information presented during any conference held under this section are considered by the Chief Counsel in reviewing the notice of proposed violation and determining the fact of violation and the amount of any penalty to be assessed.
( d ) After consideration of an informal response, including any relevant information presented at a conference, the Chief Counsel may dismiss the notice of probable violation in whole or in part. If he or she does not dismiss it in whole, he or she may issue an order assessing a civil penalty.
§ 218.103 Hand-operated switches, including crossover switches. ( a ) ( 1 ) Each railroad shall adopt and comply with an operating rule which complies with the requirements of this section. When any person including, but not limited to, each railroad, railroad officer, supervisor, and employee violates any requirement of an operating rule which complies with the requirements of this section, that person shall be considered to have violated the requirements of this section.
( 2 ) Each railroad shall specify minimum requirements necessary for an adequate job briefing.
( b ) *General.* Employees operating or verifying the position of a hand-operated switch shall: ( 1 ) Conduct job briefings, before work is begun, each time a work plan is changed, and at completion of the work;
( 2 ) Be qualified on the railroad's operating rules relating to the operation of the switch;
( 3 ) Be individually responsible for the position of the switch in use;
( 4 ) Visually determine that switches are properly lined for the intended route and that no equipment is fouling the switches;
( 5 ) Visually determine that the points fit properly and the target, if so equipped, corresponds with the switch's position;
( 6 ) After operating a switch and before making movements in either direction over the switch, ensure that the switch is secured from unintentional movement of the switch points;
( 7 ) Ensure that a switch is not operated while rolling and on-track maintenance-of-way equipment is fouling the switch, or standing or moving over the switch; and
( 8 ) After operating a switch, ensure that when not in use, each switch is locked, hooked, or latched, if so equipped.
( c ) Rolling and on-track maintenance-of-way equipment shall not foul a track until all hand-operated switches connected with the movement are properly lined, or in the case of hand-operated switches designed and permitted to be trailed through, until the intended route is seen to be clear or the train has been granted movement authority. When a conflicting movement is approaching a hand-operated switch, the track shall not be fouled or the switch operated.
( d ) When rolling and on-track maintenance-of-way equipment has entered a track, the hand-operated switch to that track shall not be lined away from the track until the equipment has passed the clearance point of the track.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paulson Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Karen L. Johannes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|/s/ Karen L. Johannes                                                          
|Karen L. Johannes Chief Financial Officer
Paulson Capital Corp. August 14, 2008

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Paulson Capital Corp. and will be retained by Paulson Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, August 3, 1995 (108), Para 108.27 Adjournment of the Two Houses]
[Pages 1256-1257]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.108.27  adjournment of the two houses

  Mr. ARMEY submitted the following privileged concurrent resolution (H. 
Con. Res. 92):

       Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
     concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legislative 
     day of Thursday, August 3, 1995 or the legislative day of 
     Friday, August 4, 1995, pursuant to a motion made by the 
     Majority Leader, or his designee, it stand adjourned until 
     noon on Wednesday, September 6, 1995, or until noon on the 
     second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant 
     to section 2 of this resolution, whichever occurs first; and 
     that when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day 
     beginning on Saturday August 5, 1995, through Saturday, 
     August 19, 1995, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority 
     Leader, or his designee, in accordance with this resolution, 
     it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Tuesday, 
     September 5, 1995, or until such time on that day as may be 
     specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the 
     motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day 
     after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
     2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
       Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of 
     the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the 
     Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the 
     Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and Senate, 
     respectively, to reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the 
     public interest shall warrant it.

  When said concurrent resolution was considered and agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said concurrent resolution

[[Page 1257]]

was agreed to was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
concurrent resolution.
```
§ 172.310 Class 7 (radioactive) materials. In addition to any other markings required by this subpart, each package containing Class 7 (radioactive) materials must be marked as follows: ( a ) Each package with a gross mass greater than 50 kg (110 lb) must have its gross mass including the unit of measurement (which may be abbreviated) marked on the outside of the package.
( b ) Each industrial, Type A, Type B(U), or Type B(M) package must be legibly and durably marked on the outside of the packaging, in letters at least 12 mm (0.47 in) high, with the words “TYPE IP-1,” “TYPE IP-2,” “TYPE IP-3,” “TYPE A,” “TYPE B(U)” or “TYPE B(M),” as appropriate. A package which does not conform to Type IP-1, Type IP-2, Type IP-3, Type A, Type B(U) or Type B(M) requirements may not be so marked.
( c ) Each package which conforms to an IP-1, IP-2, IP-3 or a Type A package design must be legibly and durably marked on the outside of the packaging with the international vehicle registration code of the country of origin of the design. The international vehicle registration code for packages designed by a United States company or agency is the symbol “USA.”
( d ) Each package which conforms to a Type B(U) or Type B(M) package design must have the outside of the outermost receptacle, which is resistant to the effects of fire and water, plainly marked by embossing, stamping or other means resistant to the effects of fire and water with a radiation symbol that conforms to the requirements of appendix B of this part.
( e ) Each Type B(U), Type B(M) or fissile material package destined for export shipment must also be marked “USA” in conjunction with the specification marking, or other package certificate identification. (See §§ 173.471, 173.472, and 173.473 of this subchapter.)
[Doc. No. RSPA-99-6283 (HM-230), 69 FR 3668, Jan. 26, 2004, as amended at 79 FR 40609, July 11, 2014]