alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 172.512 Freight containers and aircraft unit load devices. ( a ) *Capacity of 640 cubic feet or more.* Each person who offers for transportation, and each person who loads and transports, a hazardous material in a freight container or aircraft unit load device having a capacity of 640 cubic feet or more shall affix to the freight container or aircraft unit load device the placards specified for the material in accordance with § 172.504. However: ( 1 ) The placarding exception provided in § 172.504(c) applies to motor vehicles transporting freight containers and aircraft unit load devices,
( 2 ) The placarding exception provided in § 172.504(c) applies to each freight container and aircraft unit load device being transported for delivery to a consignee immediately following an air or water shipment, and,
( 3 ) Placarding is not required on a freight container or aircraft unit load device if it is only transported by air and is identified as containing a hazardous material in the manner provided in part 7, chapter 2, section 2.8, of the ICAO Technical Instructions (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter).
( b ) *Capacity less than 18 m 3 (640 cubic feet).* ( 1 ) Each person who offers for transportation by air, and each person who loads and transports by air, a hazardous material in a freight container or aircraft unit load device having a capacity of less than 18 m3 (640 cubic feet) shall affix one placard of the type specified by paragraph (a) of this section unless the freight container or aircraft unit load device: ( i ) Is labeled in accordance with subpart E of this part, including § 172.406(e);
( ii ) Contains radioactive materials requiring the Radioactive Yellow III label and is placarded with one Radioactive placard and is labeled in accordance with subpart E of this part, including § 172.406(e); or,
( iii ) Is identified as containing a hazardous material in the manner provided in part 7; chapter 2, section 2.8, of the ICAO Technical Instructions (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter).
( 2 ) When hazardous materials are offered for transportation, not involving air transportation, in a freight container having a capacity of less than 640 cubic feet the freight container need not be placarded. However, if not placarded, it must be labeled in accordance with subpart E of this part.
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, packages containing hazardous materials offered for transportation by air in freight containers are subject to the inspection requirements of § 175.30 of this chapter.
[Amdt. 172-29, 41 FR 15996, Apr. 15, 1976] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 172.513, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 21, 1995 (119), Para 119.25 Senate Joint Resolution Referred]
[Page 1449]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.119.25  senate joint resolution referred

  A joint resolution of the Senate of the following title was taken from 
the Speaker's table and, under the rule, referred as follows:

       S.J. Res. 20. Joint resolution granting the consent of 
     Congress to the compact to provide for joint natural resource 
     management and enforcement of laws and regulations pertaining 
     to natural resources and boating at the Jennings Randolph 
     Lake Project lying in Garrett County, Maryland and Mineral 
     County, West Virginia, entered into between the States of 
     West Virginia and Maryland; to the Committee on the 
     Judiciary.
```
§ 215.303 Stenciling of restricted cars. ( a ) Each restricted railroad freight car that is described in § 215.205(a) of this part shall be stenciled, or marked— ( 1 ) In clearly legible letters; and
( 2 ) In accordance with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) The letter “R” shall be— ( 1 ) Placed immediately below or to the right of the car number;
( 2 ) The same color as the reporting mark; and
( 3 ) The same size as the reporting mark.
( c ) The following terms, to the extent needed to completely indicate the basis for the restricted operation of the car, shall be placed on the car following the symbol “R” in letters not less than one inch high: ( 1 ) Age.
( 2 ) Coupler.
( 3 ) Draft.
( 4 ) Bearings.
( 5 ) Truck.
( 6 ) Underframe.
( 7 ) Wheels.
( 8 ) Yoke.
# oe..___

6H IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22

- 0488 WAGNER & LYONS, PLLC, f/k/a SULLIVAN, WAGNER & LYONS, PLLC; Appellant,

v. SUPERIOR HARDWOODS AND MILLWORK, INC., d/b/a/ GRIZZLY FLOORING INSTALLATION,

Appellee. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **Charles J Tornabene,** whose name appears ne xt on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment. A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on th e date hereof. DATED this September 19, 2022.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Jon G Beal, Jesse Beaudette, Charles J Tornabene 09/19/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0488
From: jackiemann022@comcast.net [mailto:jackiemann022@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:24 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

annette c 

55 holstein dr 

parkesburg, PA 19365
-----Original Message----- 

From: cfjr3@hotmail.com [mailto:cfjr3@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 1:11 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Claudio Freixas jr 

2121 Albee St 

Eureka, CA 95501
Order filed November 1, 2012

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00911

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF L .E.A. AND V.C.A , Appellant

On Appeal from the 418th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 12

- 07

- 07969 CV



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed September 19, 2012. To date, the filing fee of $175.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant has established indigence has been filed. See Tex. R. App . P

. 20.1. Therefore, the court issues the following order. Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $175.00 to the Clerk of this court on or before , November 16, 2012. See Tex. R. App . P. 5. If appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM
-----Original Message----- 

From: mpiersonop@bellsouth.net [mailto:mpiersonop@bellsouth.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:53 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Marilyn Pierson 

P.O. Box 462 

Tutwiler, MS 38963
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Repro-Med Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
I. Sealfon, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Andrew I. Sealfon
---------------------
Andrew I. Sealfon, President, Treasurer,
Chairman of the Board, Director, Chief Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer

October 15, 2008
Release dates | 
    Full version (23 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    
    Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia 
  | Cleveland | Richmond 
  | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis 
  | Kansas City | Dallas 
  | San Francisco

# Actions under delegated authority

## Actions taken during the week ending March 20, 2010

---





## Bank Holding Companies

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## Extensions of Time

|
|
|

## Membership

|
|
|

Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    Applications and reports received:Boston | 
    New York | 
    Philadelphia | 
    Cleveland | 
    Richmond | 
    AtlantaChicago | 
    St. Louis | 
    Minneapolis | 
    Kansas City | 
    Dallas | 
    San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact us
U.S. Department of Justice 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives 

99 New York Avenue, NE 

Washington, DC 20226 

www.atf.gov ATF

BEST PRACTICES: TRANSFERS 

OF FIREARMS BY PRIVATE 

SELLERS

ATF P 5300.21

January 2013

U. S. Department of Justice 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
TRANSFERS OF FIREARMS BY 

PRIVATE SELLERS

 An unlicensed individual may transfer a 

firearm to another unlicensed individual 

residing in the same State, provided that he 

or she has no reason to believe the buyer is 

prohibited by law from possessing firearms. 

For a list of categories prohibiting a person 

from possessing a firearm, please refer to 18 

U.S.C. 922(g) and (n). 

 An unlicensed individual is prohibited 

from directly transferring a firearm to a

person residing in another State. 

Regardless of the purpose of the transfer (e.g. 

gift, trade, loan, sale, ownership, etc.), this 

restriction applies to all types of firearms. 

 An unlicensed individual may complete a 

transfer to an out-of-State person through the 

following procedure: 

• The unlicensed individual transfers 

the firearm to a Federal Firearms 

Licensee (FFL) located in the State of 

the person receiving the firearm. 

• The FFL will transfer the firearm to 

the unlicensed out-of-State person. 

• The FFL will be responsible for 

lawfully transferring the firearm.

 An unlicensed individual may transfer 

firearms directly to FFLs operating in any 

State.

 Under Federal law, there is no 

recordkeeping requirement pertaining to the 

transfer of a firearm between two unlicensed 

individuals. 

 There may exist State or local laws that 

pertain to the transfer, including registration 

requirements. Contact the appropriate State 

agency for information regarding such 

requirements. 

TRANSACTION ALTERNATIVES FOR 

PRIVATE SELLERS

(*Please remember, these are not 

requirements, but may prove beneficial to 

both you and law enforcement) 

 For private sellers wanting assurance that 

other private individuals are not prohibited 

from possessing firearms, we encourage you 

to consider the following options: 

• Transfer the firearm to the private 

individual through an FFL. The FFL 

will be responsible for conducting a 

background check on the person 

acquiring the firearm. The FFL will 

complete the required paperwork, 

OR

• If you decide not to utilize the 

services of an FFL, examine the 

purchaser’s identification document 

to confirm that the person is a 

resident of your State. 

 If you are purchasing a firearm, record 

the acquisition in a “Personal Firearms 

Record,” ATF P 3312.8. 

• Be sure to include all identifying 

information marked on the firearm, 

including the serial number. 

• List all other personal firearms in that 

record. 

• Secure the record in a location 

separate from where you store your 

firearms. 

• In the event the firearm is lost or 

stolen, this procedure will assist you 

in reporting the necessary 

information. 

• If authorities recover the firearm this 

procedure may assist you in 

demonstrating that you are the 

rightful owner of the firearm.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

June 14, 2013

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., District Judge

*

No. 12-1104

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

NICOLAS GOMEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of

Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 1:10-cr-01055-1

William J. Hibbler,

Judge.

O R D E R

The Petition for Rehearing En Banc is GRANTED. The panel’s opinion and judgment

are VACATED. The parties shall file new briefs addressing the following matters:

1. Whetherthe four-part test for Rule 404(b) evidence in our case law is useful, or

whether the court should adopt a different test, such as one that asks: (a)

whether the proposed evidence is relevant to any specifically identifiable and

disputednon-propensityissue(s), andif so,howthe evidence is relevant tosuch

issue(s) without relying on propensity inferences; and (b) whether, under Rule

403, the evidence would be unduly prejudicial?

The Honorable Robert L. Miller, Jr., of the Northern District of Indiana, sitting by

*

designation.

Case: 12-1104 Document: 48 Filed: 06/14/2013 Pages: 2
No. 12-1104 Page 2

2. Whether admissionof evidenceunderRule 404(b) shouldrequire theuseofjury

instructions that identify the specific permissible use(s) ofthe evidence, such as

language along the lines of Instruction No. 3.11 in the 2012 version of this

court’s Criminal Pattern Jury Instructions?

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that supplemental briefing shall proceed as follows:

1. The opening supplemental brief of defendant-appellant Gomez is due on or

before July 12, 2013.

2. The responsive brief of plaintiff-appellee United States is due on or before

August 9, 2013.

3. Appellant may file a supplemental reply brief no later than August 23, 2013.

Counsel shall submit thirty-five (35) copies of all briefs and appendices and any

citations of additional authority.

By separate order at a later date, the court will schedule oral argument en banc.

Important Scheduling Notice !

Notices of hearing for particular appeals are mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Criminal appeals are scheduled

shortly after the filing of the appellant's main brief; civil appeals after the filing of the appellee's brief. If you foresee that you

will be unavailable during a period in which your particular appeal might be scheduled, please write the clerk advising him

of the time period and the reason for such unavailability. Session data is located at

http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/calendar.pdf. Once an appeal is formally scheduled for a certain date, it is very difficult

to have the setting changed. See Circuit Rule 34(e).

Case: 12-1104 Document: 48 Filed: 06/14/2013 Pages: 2
-----Original Message----- 

From: fishiefreedom@yahoo.com [mailto:fishiefreedom@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:01 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Nicole Ihler 

County Rd 223 

Kingdom City, MO 65251
# EUR-Lex - 52004AP0104(01) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52004AP0104(01)

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters concerning the extension of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Islamic Federal Republic of the Comoros on fishing off the Comoros for the period from 28 February 2004 to 31 December 2004 (COM(2004)0540 — C6-0115/2004 — 2004/0185(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 226 E , 15/09/2005 P. 0340 - 0341 *

Joint declarations

1. "The Budgetary Authority invites the Commission to present each year, together with its PDB, an updated situation of those posts that cannot be occupied or have been redeployed as a result of the creation of Executive Agencies."

Amending Budget for 2005 on administrative expenditure

2. "The Budgetary Authority invites the Commission to submit not later than March 2005 an Amending Budget containing exclusively the reductions of appropriations for administrative expenditure of the institutions resulting from the annual adaptation of the salaries and pensions."

Payment appropriations for Heading 2

3. "If the execution of payment appropriations for Structural Funds exceeds 40 % by the end of July 2005, or if the Commission becomes otherwise convinced of a shortage in payment appropriations, the Commission will, after having examined the possibilities of redeployment of payment appropriations within the totality of the budget, including Heading 2, and evaluated possible sources of additional revenue, present as soon as possible a PDAB to the budgetary authority. The European Parliament and the Council will decide in one single reading on the PDAB in order to have additional appropriations needed available at the latest in early November 2005. This PDAB to be presented and decided in one single reading is exclusively meant for the appropriations needed under Heading 2."

--------------------------------------------------
###### Editorial Note on Part 190

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 190 appear at 78 FR 58908, Sept. 25, 2013.

#### § 190.217 Compliance orders generally.

When a Regional Director has reason to believe that a person is engaging in conduct that violates 49 U.S.C. 60101 *et seq.,* 33 U.S.C. 1321(j), or any regulation or order issued thereunder, and if the nature of the violation and the public interest so warrant, the Regional Director may initiate proceedings under §§ 190.207 through 190.213 to determine the nature and extent of the violations and for the issuance of an order directing compliance.

[Amdt. 190-16, 78 FR 58912, Sept. 25, 2013]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
financial statements in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VLSI Technology, 
Inc. for the quarter ended March 28, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000704386
<NAME>                            VLSI TECHNOLOGY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                         USD
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          90,634
<SECURITIES>                                   117,408
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (2,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     57,054
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               438,919
<PP&E>                                         794,269
<DEPRECIATION>                                (369,267)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 882,409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          210,747
<BONDS>                                        207,758
<COMMON>                                           472
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     463,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   882,409
<SALES>                                        177,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,684
<CGS>                                          100,905
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  100,905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                61,771
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (290)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,206
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,220
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,986
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,986
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        

			
			
		




</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133633 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. 

### Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman, Justices 

### v SC: 133633 COA: 274699 Genesee CC: 06-017547-FC CARRICE OTAY BYROM, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 20, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented shou ld be reviewed by this Court.

s0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk