alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 19, 1995 (97), Para 97.11 Recorded Vote]
[Pages 1154-1155]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.97.11  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following substitute amendment submitted by Mr. HOBSON 
for the amendment submitted by Mr. PACKARD:
  Substitute amendment submitted by Mr. HOBSON:
       Page 84, after line 17, insert the following new section:
       Sec. 628. None of the funds made available in this Act may 
     be obligated or expended for any employee training when it is 
     made known to the Federal official having authority to 
     obligate or expend such funds that such employee training--
       (1) does not upgrade employee productivity and 
     effectiveness;
       (2) does not meet identified needs for knowledge, skills, 
     and abilities bearing upon the performance of official 
     duties;
       (3) is inappropriate to the workplace;
       (4) is designed to change participants' personal values or 
     lifestyle outside the workplace;
       (5) does not require prior employee notification of the 
     content and methods to be used in the training and written 
     end of course evaluations; or
       (6) does not provide an acceptable alternative for those 
     employees articulating a religious or moral objection to 
     participating in an HIV/AIDS training program.
  Amendment submitted by Mr. PACKARD:
       Page 84, after line 17, insert the following new section:
       Sec. 628. None of the funds made available in this Act may 
     be obligated or expended for any employee training when it is 
     made

[[Page 1155]]

      known to the Federal official having authority to obligate 
     or expend such funds that such employee training--
       (1) does not meet identified needs for knowledge, skills, 
     and abilities bearing directly upon the performance of 
     official duties;
       (2) contains elements likely to induce high levels of 
     emotional response or psychological stress in some 
     participants;
       (3) does not require prior employee notification of the 
     content and methods to be used in the training and written 
     end of course evaluations;
       (4) contains any methods or content associated with 
     religious or quasi-religious belief systems or ``new age'' 
     belief systems as defined in Equal Employment Opportunity 
     Commission Notice N-915.022, dated September 2, 1988;
       (5) is offensive to, or designed to change, participants' 
     personal values or lifestyle outside the workplace; or
       (6) includes content related to human immunodeficiency 
     virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) other 
     than that necessary to make employees more aware of the 
     medical ramifications of HIV/AIDS and the workplace rights of 
     HIV-positive employees.

It was decided in the

Yeas

201

negative

Nays

223
```
#### § 196.107 What must an excavator do if a pipeline is damaged by excavation activity?

If a pipeline is damaged in any way by excavation activity, the excavator must promptly report such damage to the pipeline operator, whether or not a leak occurs, at the earliest practicable moment following discovery of the damage.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending January 19, 2013

|Filer                                           | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                          
|----------------------------------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|CABOOL STATE BANK EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN | * 3A3       | Cabool State Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Cabool, Missouri, to acquire up to 1.58 percent (for total control of up to 29.38 percent) of the outstanding voting shares of Cabool Bancshares, Inc., Cabool, Missouri, and thereby increase its indirect control of Cabool State Bank, Cabool, Missouri. | Newspaper:02/17/2013Federal Register:02/19/2013
|Newspaper:                                      | 02/17/2013 
|Federal Register:                               | 02/19/2013 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location         | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------ | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|BANK OF SALEM, SALEM, ARKANSAS | 931047 | 10/01/2012 | 01/07/2013     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,783,920               1,967,964
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              115,965,158             113,610,782
<ALLOWANCES>                                27,424,641              23,604,810
<INVENTORY>                                 15,509,196               4,737,085
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                         729,285                 640,744
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              97,058,236              83,605,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       93,571,114              79,502,966
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        55,167                  11,022
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                97,058,236              83,605,986
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,284,198              14,051,911
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,548,899              12,616,202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               191,121                 513,372
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,350,490              7,338,8915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,264,701)               1,435,709
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,698,803)                 606,556
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (565,898)                 829,153
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (565,898)                 829,153
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)<F1>                 .15<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)                     .14
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNT REPORTED IS FOR EPS BASIC
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
ATTACHMENT B

PUBLIC MEETING TO CONSIDER PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE AIRBORNE 

TOXIC CONTROL MEASURE FOR IN-USE DIESEL-FUELED TRANSPORT 

REFRIGERATION UNITS (TRU) AND TRU GENERATOR SETS, AND FACILITIES 

WHERE TRUs OPERATE

Staff’s Suggested Modifications to the Original Proposal

TO BE PRESENTED AT THE OCTOBER 20, 2011 HEARING 

OF THE AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Shown below are the staff’s suggested modifications to the originally proposed 

amendments to the regulatory text set forth in Appendix A to the Staff Report: Initial 

Statement of Reasons, which was released August 31, 2011, and in Attachment C to 

Resolution 11-35. Only those portions containing the suggested modifications are 

included. All proposed modifications will be made available to the public for a 

fifteen-day comment period prior to final adoption. 

Section 2477.13 Requirements for TRU and TRU Generator Set Original 

Equipment Manufacturers

It was suggested that ARB allow TRU and TRU generator set (gen set) original 

equipment manufacturers (OEMs) that install flexibility engines in TRUs or TRU gen 

sets to provide a written disclosure document with the unit with instructions to the dealer 

that installs the TRU to notify the ultimate purchaser and provide the OEM’s written 

disclosure to the end-user that the unit is equipped with a flexibility engine at point of 

sale. Staff agrees and will modify the amended language.

It was also suggested that ARB allow the OEM an alternative to providing a registration 

information document with each unit, and instead, allow them to provide an on-line

look-up for the owner to get this information. Staff will modify the amended language to 

allow for alternatives to the registration information documentation.

Section 2477.14 Requirements for TRU, TRU Gen Set, and TRU-Equipped Truck 

and Trailer Dealers

It was suggested the regulation should also require TRU, TRU gen set, and 

TRU-equipped truck and trailer dealers to follow the OEM’s instructions to notify the 

end-user and pass the disclosure document for flexibility engines to the end-user. Staff 

agrees and will modify the amended language.
-----Original Message----- 

From: natebarto515@hotmail.com [mailto:natebarto515@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:08 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

nathan barto 

5052 ep true parkway 

west des moines, IA 50265
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0638 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-266-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update 

accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated 

Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain

for either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements 

for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES NO 

Explanation:
**EXHIBIT
      31.2**





I,
      Wang,
      Xiao Jun, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Dark Dynamite Inc.





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects our
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows as of, and for, the
      periods presented in this annual report;





4.
      Our
      other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
      disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c)
      and 15d-(e)) for us have:





a) Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to us, including its consolidates subsidiaries, is made
      known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in
      which this report is being prepared;





b) Evaluated
      the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, and presented
      in
      this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
      and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
      such
      evaluation; and





c) Disclosed
      in this report any change in our internal control over financial reporting
      that
      occurred during our most recent fiscal period that has materially affected,
      or
      is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
      reporting; and





5.
      Our
      other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
      evaluation, to our auditors and the audit committee of our board of directors
      (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
      could adversely affect our ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial data and have identified for our auditors any material weaknesses
      in
      internal controls (all of which do not apply); and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in our internal controls, (all of which do not apply);
      and








Date:
      April 12, 2007





/s/
      Wang, Xiao Jun


Wang,
      Xiao Jun


Chief
      Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Veterans’ Disability Benefits Commission has scheduled a meeting for September 5-7, 2007, at the Hamilton Crowne Plaza Hotel, 14th and K Streets, NW., Washington, DC. On Wednesday, September 5, the session will begin at 10 a.m. and end at 5:30 p.m. On Thursday, September 6, the session will begin at 8:30 a.m. and end at 5:30 p.m. On Friday, September 7, the session will begin at 8:30 a.m. and end at 3 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Commission is to carry out a study of the benefits under the laws of the United States that are provided to compensate and assist veterans and their survivors for disabilities and deaths attributable to military service.

                    The agenda for this meeting will feature ongoing review, discussions and decisions regarding the Commission's final report. There will be time set aside for public comments. Interested persons may attend and present oral statements to the Commission on September 5. Oral presentations will be limited to five minutes or less. Interested parties may also provide written comments for review by the Commission prior to the meeting or, at any time, by e-mail to                     *veterans@vetscommission.com*                     or by mail to Mr. Ray Wilburn, Executive Director, Veterans' Disability Benefits Commission, 1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004.                

Dated: August 13, 2007. 

By Direction of the Secretary

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-4047 Filed 8-17-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
-----Original Message----- 

From: lorraine.d.johnson@gmail.com [mailto:lorraine.d.johnson@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:35 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lorraine D. Johnson 

4858 S. Kenny St. 

Seattle, WA 98118
#### The Second National Bank, Plaintiff, v. Arthur Dyett and another, Defendants.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted with leave to renew on iurther papers showing by proper proof the necessity for an examination.
-----Original Message----- 

From: reesetee@gmail.com [mailto:reesetee@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:10 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

T DeAngelis 

332 Tall Meadow Lane 

Yardley, PA 19067
Opinion i ssued June 28 , 2012 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

NO . 01
- 12
- 00348
- CR

____________ GERMAN JESSE PENA , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 338 t h District C ourt

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No . 1320749

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, German Jesse Pena , pleaded guilty to the felony offense of aggravated assault. The trial court found appellant guilty, and i n accordance with the terms of a ppellan t’s plea agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to
confinement for two years in the Institutional Division of the Texas D epartment of2

Criminal Justice. Appellant has filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal. In a plea

- bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’ s permission to appeal. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be
dismissed if a certification showing that t he defendant has the right of appeal has not been m ade part of the record. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2 (d). Here, the trial court’ s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id

. T he trial court ’s certification states t hat this is a plea

- bargain case and that the appellant has no right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial court’ s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal , we must dismi ss this appeal

. See Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea

- bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited
appea l without further action, regardl ess of the basis for the appeal.”)

. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss all pending motions as moot.
P ER CURI A M Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes

.3

D o not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).