alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<PAGE>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                       <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996             OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996             OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2460879                  912290
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 12231573                20215180
<ALLOWANCES>                                    548000                 1140000
<INVENTORY>                                    7446025                11576651
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              22561694                33129382
<PP&E>                                        28686037                37100695
<DEPRECIATION>                                10852764                13825053
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                44062576                60345713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8982904                14194210
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       8382682                 8384930
<OTHER-SE>                                    16258038                18464842
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  44062576                60345713
<SALES>                                       66356876               108384638
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              66356876               108384638
<CGS>                                         44091792                73138999
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 44091792                73138999
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              16197359                28079009
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              692914                 1586418
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5623687                 6337425
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2251319                 2570644
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3372368                 3766781
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3372368                 3766781
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41                    0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40                    0.45
        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Petition of ELIHU J. GRANGER, Defendant and Appellant, *v.*EDWIN A. SHEBLE, Plaintiff and Respondent.

*Bemoval of came from the Mwrine Oourt to the Supreme Court, in order to change the*venue— *Code of Civil Procedure, sec.*819.

Where an application is made, as provided in section 319 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to remove an action from the Marine Court to the Supreme Court, for the purpose of changing the place of trial thereof, no demand for a change of the place of trial need he made prior to giving notice of the application.

Appeal from an order made at a Special Term, denying a motion to remove the action from the Marine Oourt of the city of *242New York to the Supreme Court, for the purpose of changing the place of trial.

*O. P.*Backus, for the appellant.

*W. E. R.*Bussell, for the respondent.

Per Curiam:

The application to change the place of trial was predicated of section 319, of the Code, which declares what sections shall be applicable to the proceedings contemplated. It appears that this action was commenced on the 18th of March, 1884; issue was joined on the twenty-fourth of April following, and a motion to change the place of trial to the Second District noticed for the twenty-sixth of April and argued on the fifth of May.

The learned justice in the court below denied the motion on the ground that it was made too late. ."We think this was a missapprehension of the provisions of the Code relative to such applications. The section already mentioned declares that the application may be made by an order at any time after the joinder of an issue of fact and before the trial thereof, and does not require in express terms or by implication that any demand should be made for a change of place of trial prior to the notice of application. Whether the order sought should be granted or not is purely a matter of discretion. *(Cornell*v. Evans, 7 Hun, 299.)

' It seems that the learned justice in the court below did not examine the case upon its merits and therefore the element of discretion was not called into requisition. For these reasons we think that the order should be reversed with leave to renew the motion on its merits. It is proper to suggest that in this and all similar applications something more is required to be shown than the mere fact that the defendant is not a resident of the county where the action is brought.

Present — Davis, P. J., Brady and Daniels, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to renew the motion on its merits.
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.132 Design and construction of aboveground breakout tanks. ( a ) Each aboveground breakout tank must be designed and constructed to withstand the internal pressure produced by the hazardous liquid to be stored therein and any anticipated external loads.
( b ) For aboveground breakout tanks first placed in service after October 2, 2000, compliance with paragraph (a) of this section requires one of the following: ( 1 ) Shop-fabricated, vertical, cylindrical, closed top, welded steel tanks with nominal capacities of 90 to 750 barrels (14.3 to 119.2 m3) and with internal vapor space pressures that are approximately atmospheric must be designed and constructed in accordance with API Spec 12F (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3) .
( 2 ) Welded, low-pressure (*i.e.*, internal vapor space pressure not greater than 15 psig (103.4 kPa)), carbon steel tanks that have wall shapes that can be generated by a single vertical axis of revolution must be designed and constructed in accordance with API Std 620 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3).
( 3 ) Vertical, cylindrical, welded steel tanks with internal pressures at the tank top approximating atmospheric pressures (*i.e.*, internal vapor space pressures not greater than 2.5 psig (17.2 kPa), or not greater than the pressure developed by the weight of the tank roof) must be designed and constructed in accordance with API Std 650 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3).
( 4 ) High pressure steel tanks (*i.e.*, internal gas or vapor space pressures greater than 15 psig (103.4 kPa)) with a nominal capacity of 2000 gallons (7571 liters) or more of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) must be designed and constructed in accordance with API Std 2510 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3).
[Amdt. 195-66, 64 FR 15935, Apr. 2, 1999, as amended by Amdt. 195-99, 80 FR 186, Jan. 5, 2015; 80 FR 46848, Aug. 6, 2015]
-1- 

### STATE OF MICHIGAN

COURT OF APPEALS

NANCY LATESSA,

Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED May 25, 2017

v No. 331476
Macomb Circuit Court MICHIGAN INSTITUTE OF UROLOGY, PC, ST. JOHN PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM, ST. JOHN MACOMB-OAKLAND HOSPITAL, SCOTT SIRCUS, M.D., and GEORGE CHRISTENSEN, D.O., LC No. 2014-003645-NH

Defendants-Appellees.

Before: M. J. K ELLY , P.J., and B ECKERING and S HAPIRO , JJ.

P ER C URIAM

.
I concur in the result only.

/s/ Douglas B. Shapiro
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of American Retirement Villas Properties II, a California limited partnership (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John A. Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John A. Moore                                                                
|John A. Moore                                                                    
|Chief Executive Officer of ARV Assisted Living, Inc. its Managing General Partner



March 30, 2004
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Datakey, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Timothy L. Russell, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: November 14, 2003

Signature:
    
    /s/ Timothy L. RussellTimothy L. Russell
Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1964 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1964

 To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to the unknown 
 Vermonter who lost his life while serving in the Continental Army in 
  the War of Independence and who has been selected by the people of 
           Vermont to represent all Vermont unknown soldiers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 1995

 Mr. Sanders introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to the unknown 
 Vermonter who lost his life while serving in the Continental Army in 
  the War of Independence and who has been selected by the people of 
           Vermont to represent all Vermont unknown soldiers.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF MEDAL OF HONOR.

    The President may award, and present in the name of Congress, the 
Medal of Honor to the unknown Vermonter who lost his life while serving 
in the War of Independence as a member of the Continental Army and who 
has been selected by the people of Vermont to represent all Vermont 
unknown soldiers.
                                 <all>
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: trains53_2000@yahoo.com [mailto:trains53_2000@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:38 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Christopher Tandy 

1948 Roanoke Av 

Louisville, KY 40205
-----Original Message----- 

From: ascccr@aol.com [mailto:ascccr@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:18 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Alden Crandall 

52 Trowbridge Circle 

Stoughton, MA 02072
#### Lee v. Griffin.

(Decided September 19, 1919.)

Appeal from Clinton Circuit Court.

Partnership — -Accounting—Report of Master. — Upon an accounting •between parties the report of the master, examined and found to be correct, will be sustained.

S. *G.*SMITH for appellant.

ELZA BERTRAM for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Quin

Affirming.

Appellee, as plaintiff below, filed this suit seeking the dissolution and settlement of a copartnership with appellant. Appellant was engaged in the distillation of whiskey and brandy.

Under a verbal agreement appellee obligated himself to pay appellant seven hundred dollars and he was to operate the distillery, the profits and expenses to be shared equally. Shortly after entering into said agreement appellant moved to Tennessee, leaving his brother and nephew to look after his interests. After operating the plant for several months, the brother, on one occasion, gave such an exhibition of his. shooting propensities, accompanied with divers threats against appellee, as to cause the latter to quit the business and sue for a settlement.

Appellant admitted a partnership agreement, one different, however, from that alleged in the petition, but he claims appellee never performed his part of the contract.

The cause was referred to the Master Commissioner, proof taken, and in a splendid report the Master found that appellant was indebted to appellee in the sum of twelve hundred, fifty-nine'and 55/100 dollars ($1,259,-*9455). With commendable care and detail the several debits and credits claimed by the parties are fairly dealt with, fully explained and properly treated. It is conceded that a partnership existed. This being true there remained only the question of accounting. Appellant fails to show wherein the report is erroneous in any respect.

Considering the indefinite character of evidence adduced by appellant, and the fact that it furnished practically no aid or assistance to the court or Master in arriving at the correct sum due, appellant has fared exceedingly well and certainly has no cause to complain of the conclusion reached.

The judgment confirms and approves the report of the Master, and finding no error therein,, same is accordingly affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2161 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2161

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
  the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

                                 An Act

 
 To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act of 
           1994 until October 1, 1995, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 583(a) of the Foreign Relations 
Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103-236), as 
amended by Public Law 104-17, is amended by striking ``August 15, 
1995,'' and inserting ``October 1, 1995,''.
    (b) Consultation.--For purposes of any exercise of the authority 
provided in section 583(a) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, 
Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103-236) prior to August 16, 
1995, the written policy justification dated June 1, 1995, and 
submitted to the Congress in accordance with section 583(b)(1) of such 
Act, and the consultations associated with such policy justification, 
shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements of section 583(b)(1) of 
such Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SYLVAN HAYES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 274 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SYLVAN HAYES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 275 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of March, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 21

6 Harrison Corporation
Ark 38 Corporation
Beach Funding Corporation
Branford 55 Corporation
Cal Second 49 Corporation
CAPT 47 Corporation
Coast 56 Corporation
DAPT 51 Corporation
Ericsson Associates Inc.
Fort Granite 44 Corporation
Garfield 48 Corporation
Greenwich 1st Corporation
Greenwich Funding Corporation
Greenwich Mgmt Corporation
Harrison 1st Corporation
Harrison Financial Associates Inc.
Harrison Financial Corporation
Harrison Funding Corporation
Hudson Management Corporation
Island 52 Corporation
Jackson Union 28 Corporation
Jersey 45 Corporation
Kearny 39 Corporation
Madison 54 Corporation
Mass Fed 29 Corporation
New Haven 40 Corporation
New Haven 53 Corporation
Newport 50 Corporation
North Fork 41 Corporation
Norwich 42 Corporation
NY Apt 33 Corporation
Rontex 1617 Corporation
Shelton 46 Corporation
St. Pete 43 Corporation
Tribeca Funding Corporation
Worth Management Corporation
Rockwell Drilling Corporation
Tribeca Lending Corporation
Miramar Resources Inc.
§ 179.200-6 Thickness of plates. ( a ) The wall thickness after forming of the tank shell, dome shell, and of 2:1 ellipsoidal heads must be not less than specified in § 179.201-1, nor that calculated by the following formula: Where: *d* = Inside diameter in inches; *E* = 0.9 Welded joint efficiency; except *E* = 1.0 for seamless heads; *P* = Minimum required bursting pressure in psig; *S* = Minimum tensile strength of plate material in p.s.i. as prescribed in § 179.200-7; *t* = Minimum thickness of plate in inches after forming.
( b ) The wall thickness after forming of 3:1 ellipsoidal heads must be not less than specified in § 179.201-1, nor that calculated by the following formula: Where: *d* = Inside diameter in inches; *E* = 0.9 Welded joint efficiency; except *E* = 1.0 for seamless heads; *P* = Minimum required bursting pressure in psig; *S* = Minimum tensile strength of plate material in p.s.i. as prescribed in § 179.200-7; *t* = Minimum thickness of plate in inches after forming.
( c ) The wall thickness after forming of a flanged and dished head must be not less than specified in § 179.201-1, nor that calculated by the following formula: Where: *E* = 0.9 Welded joint efficiency; except *E* = 1.0 for seamless heads; *L* = Main inside radius to which head is dished, measured on concave side in inches; *P* = Minimum required bursting pressure in psig; *S* = Minimum tensile strength of plate material in p.s.i. as prescribed in § 179.200-7; *t* = Minimum thickness of plate in inches after forming.
( d ) If plates are clad with material having tensile strength properties at least equal to the base plate, the cladding may be considered a part of the base plate when determining thickness. If cladding material does not have tensile strength at least equal to the base plate, the base plate alone must meet the thickness requirements.
( e ) For a tank constructed of longitudinal sections, the minimum width of bottom sheet of the tank must be 60 inches measured on the arc, but in all cases the width must be sufficient to bring the entire width of the longitudinal welded joint, including welds, above the bolster.
( f ) For a tank built of one piece cylindrical sections, the thickness specified for bottom sheet must apply to the entire cylindrical section.
( g ) See § 179.200-9 for thickness requirements for a compartmented tank.
[Amdt. 179-10, 36 FR 21349, Nov. 6, 1971, as amended at 66 FR 45390, Aug. 28, 2001]
-----Original Message----- 

From: darose47@gmail.com [mailto:darose47@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:21 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Don Rose 

3736 Jones Creek Rd 

Mariposa, CA 95338
§ 179.220-13 Inner container manway nozzle and cover. ( a ) Inner container manway nozzle must be of approved design with access opening at least 18 inches inside diameter, or at least 14 inches by 18 inches obround or oval.
( b ) Manway covers must be of approved type. Design must provide a secure closure of the manway and must make it impossible to remove the cover while the tank interior is under pressure.
( c ) All joints between manway covers and their seats must be made tight against leakage of vapor and liquid by use of suitable gaskets.
( d ) Manway covers must be cast, forged, or fabricated metal complying with subsection § 179.220-7(g) of this section.
( e ) A seal must be provided between the inner container manway nozzle and the opening in the outer shell.
[Amdt. 179-9, 36 FR 21341, Nov. 6, 1971]
From: jamccoll@aol.com [mailto:jamccoll@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:13 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

It's only right. Why should someone unfortunate enough to require 

further mental health care not be included? 

Sincerely, 

John McColl 

7144 N Harlem Ave # 117 

Chicago, IL 60631