alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 179.300-15 Pressure relief devices. ( a ) Unless prohibited in part 173 of this subchapter, tanks shall be equipped with one or more relief devices of approved type, made of metal not subject to rapid deterioration by the lading and screwed directly into tank heads or attached to tank heads by other approved methods. The total discharge capacity shall be sufficient to prevent building up pressure in tank in excess of 82.5 percent of the tank test pressure. When relief devices of the fusible plug type are used, the required discharge capacity shall be available in each head. See AAR Specifications for Tank Cars, appendix A (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter), for the formula for calculating discharge capacity.
( b ) Threads for openings shall be National Gas Taper Threads (NGT) tapped to gage, clean cut, even and without checks.
( c ) Pressure relief devices shall be set for start-to-discharge and rupture discs shall burst at a pressure not exceeding that specified in § 179.301.
( d ) Fusible plugs shall function at a temperature not exceeding 175 °F. and shall be vapor-tight at a temperature of not less than 130 °F.
[29 FR 18995, Dec. 29, 1964, as amended at 64 FR 51920, Sept. 27, 1999; 66 FR 45390, Aug. 28, 2001; 68 FR 75763, Dec. 31, 2003]
From: mgwebster0344@sbcglobal.net [mailto:mgwebster0344@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:51 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Michael Webster 

2515 Golden Villas 

Pasadena, TX 77503
#### § 1560.201 Applicability.

This subpart applies to individuals who believe they have been improperly or unfairly delayed or prohibited from boarding an aircraft or entering a sterile area as a result of the Secure Flight program.
-----Original Message----- 

From: davidguyebben@yahoo.com [mailto:davidguyebben@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:54 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

David Ebben 

431 1/2 Griffey Street 

River Falls, WI 54022
-----Original Message----- 

From: kdrahn@aol.com [mailto:kdrahn@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:57 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kathrynn Drahn 

2835 Vereda de Pueblo 

Santa Fe, NM 87507
10.6

Modification letter to promissory note between      Bourque Printing and Hibernia National Bank, Inc. dated December 28, 2004.

----

Dear Todd:

Hibernia National Bank      ('Bank') extended a loan to Bourque Printing, Inc., a subsidiary      of Champion Industries, on March 19, 2003 as evidenced by a promissory note      of the same date and in the amount of $1,440,000. This not contains language      that allows the note to be paid on demand. The bank hereby agrees to delete      the following from this note, Borrower will pay this loan on demand. The      repayment terms of 83 regular payments of $10,876.57 each on one irregular      payment estimated at $892,791.97 remain in effect.

Let me know if you      have any questions.

Sincerely,

 

****
Exhibit 32.1

Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Boston Biomedica, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard T. Schumacher, Chief Executive Officer of
Boston Biomedica, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) that:

(1)   The
Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: June 25, 2004 |  | /s/RICHARD T. SCHUMACHERRichard T. Schumacher
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Boston Biomedica, Inc. and will be retained by Boston
Biomedica, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
-----Original Message----- 

From: Regba@aol.com [mailto:Regba@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:25 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Regina Bann 

366 Hartford Rd 

South Orange, NJ 07079
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>	                          					<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              SEPT-30-1996
<CASH>                                          22,910
<SECURITIES>                                   165,645
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,190
[ALLOWANCE]                                      6,272
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               188,555
<PP&E>                                          20,001
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,991
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 535,840
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          489,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>					                                 2,569
<COMMON>                                           600
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY                    535,840
<SALES>                                         27,307
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,389
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,390
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    80
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,782
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,091
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,691
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,691
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    19.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    19.91
        

</TABLE>
From: millerd@bc.edu [mailto:millerd@bc.edu] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:28 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Dorothy Miller 

580 Dedham St 

Newton Center, MA 02459
§ 1113.1 Scheduling hearings; continued hearings. ( a ) *Assignment; service and posting of notice.* In those proceedings in which an oral hearing is to be held, the Board will assign a time and place for hearing. Notice of hearings will be posted on the Board's Web site, will be served upon the parties and such other persons as may be entitled to receive notice under the Act, and will be available for inspection at the Board's office.
( b ) *Requests for changes in assignment.* Requests for postponements of date of hearing will be granted only in exceptional circumstances.
( c ) *Continuances.* ( 1 ) A continuance may be granted at the discretion of the presiding officer.
( 2 ) If the presiding officer announces the time and place of a continued hearing on the record, no further notice need be given.
[47 FR 49559, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 52712, Oct. 8, 1996; 74 FR 52907, Oct. 15, 2009]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2040 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2040

To provide for the treatment of Indian tribal governments under section 
              403(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 1995

Mr. Shaw (for himself, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Kleczka, and Mr. Hastings of 
   Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the treatment of Indian tribal governments under section 
              403(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS UNDER SECTION 403(b).

    In the case of any contract purchased in a plan year beginning 
before January 1, 1995, section 403(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 shall be applied as if any reference to an employer described in 
section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 which is exempt 
from tax under section 501 of such Code included a reference to an 
employer which is an Indian tribal government (as defined by section 
7701(a)(40) of such Code), a subdivision of an Indian tribal government 
(determined in accordance with section 7871(d) of such Code), an agency 
or instrumentality of an Indian tribal government or subdivision 
thereof, or a corporation chartered under Federal, State, or tribal law 
which is owned in whole or in part by any of the foregoing.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

          - 32 CFR Part 650

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Final rule; removal.

# SUMMARY:

                        This action removes 32 CFR part 650, Environmental Protection and Enhancement, published in the                         **Federal Register**                        , December 29, 1977 (42 FR 65026). The rule is being removed because it is now obsolete and does not affect the general public.                     

# DATES:

Effective July 20, 2007.

# ADDRESSES:

Headquarters, Department of the Army, Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management, ATTN: DAIM-ED, 600 Army Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310-0600. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Douglas Warnock, (703) 601-1573.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management, is the proponent for the regulation represented in 32 CFR part 650, and has concluded this regulation is obsolete. This regulation has been extensively revised and has been determined that the procedures prescribed in the regulation are for Army officials, and not intended to be enforced against any member of                           ( print page 39741)                        the public. As a result, the regulation does not affect the general public. Therefore, it would be helpful in avoiding confusion with the public if 32 CFR part 650, is removed.                

# List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 650

      - Air pollution control
      - Environmental protection
      - Federal buildings and facilities
      - Hazardous substances
      - Historic preservation
      - Noise control
      - Waste treatment and disposal
      - Water pollution control

# PART 650—[REMOVED]

                        Accordingly, for reasons stated in the preamble, under the authority of 10 U.S.C. 3012, 32 CFR part 650,                         *Environmental Protection and Enhancement*, is removed in its entirely.                    

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-3538  Filed 7-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.143 General requirements. ( a ) Each component of a pipeline must be able to withstand operating pressures and other anticipated loadings without impairment of its serviceability with unit stresses equivalent to those allowed for comparable material in pipe in the same location and kind of service. However, if design based upon unit stresses is impractical for a particular component, design may be based upon a pressure rating established by the manufacturer by pressure testing that component or a prototype of the component.
( b ) The design and installation of pipeline components and facilities must meet applicable requirements for corrosion control found in subpart I of this part.
( c ) Except for excess flow valves, each plastic pipeline component installed after January 22, 2019 must be able to withstand operating pressures and other anticipated loads in accordance with a listed specification.
[Amdt. 48, 49 FR 19824, May 10, 1984, as amended at 72 FR 20059, Apr. 23, 2007; Amdt. 192-124, 83 FR 58717, Nov. 20, 2018]
#### Seth Pierce, *Respondent, v.*Oliver St. Marie, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, August 4, 1995 (109), Para 109.42 Subsequent Action on a Reported Bill]
[Page 1295]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.109.42  subsequent action on a reported bill

  Under clause 5 of rule X, the following action was taken by the 
Speaker:

       H.R. 927. The Committees on Banking and Financial Services, 
     the Judiciary and Ways and Means discharged. H.R. 927 
     referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 
     the Union.
```
June 17, 2015

Mr. Frank C. D’Amato

18 Pear Street Barnesville, PA 18214

Dear Mr. D’Amato:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0977) on April 10, 2015, but we are unable to process you r request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or ar guments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any fu rther, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requi res you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days , we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additiona l time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
§ 1570.119 Petitions for reconsideration. ( a ) If an owner/operator seeks to petition for reconsideration of a determination, required modification, denial of a request for amendment by the owner/operator, denial to rescind a TSA-required amendment, or denial of an alternative measure, the owner/operator must submit a written petition for reconsideration that includes a statement and any supporting documentation explaining why the owner/operator believes TSA's decision is incorrect.
( b ) Upon review of the petition for reconsideration, the Administrator or designee will dispose of the petition by affirming, modifying, or rescinding its previous decision. This is considered a final agency action.
§ 1503.631 Interlocutory appeals. ( a ) *General.* Unless otherwise provided in this subpart, a party may not appeal a ruling or decision of the ALJ to the TSA decision maker until the initial decision has been entered on the record. A decision or order of the TSA decision maker on the interlocutory appeal does not constitute a final order of the Administrator for the purposes of judicial appellate review under 49 U.S.C. 46110.
( b ) *Interlocutory appeal for cause.* If a party files a written request for an interlocutory appeal for cause with the ALJ, or orally requests an interlocutory appeal for cause, the proceedings are stayed until the ALJ issues a decision on the request. If the ALJ grants the request, the proceedings are stayed until the TSA decision maker issues a decision on the interlocutory appeal. The ALJ must grant an interlocutory appeal for cause if a party shows that delay of the appeal would be detrimental to the public interest or would result in undue prejudice to any party.
( c ) *Interlocutory appeals of right.* If a party notifies the ALJ of an interlocutory appeal of right, the proceedings are stayed until the TSA decision maker issues a decision on the interlocutory appeal. A party may file an interlocutory appeal, without the consent of the ALJ, before an initial decision has been entered in the following cases: ( 1 ) A ruling or order by the ALJ barring a person from the proceedings.
( 2 ) Failure of the ALJ to dismiss the proceedings in accordance with § 1503.623.
( 3 ) A ruling or order by the ALJ in violation of § 1503.607(b).
( 4 ) A ruling or order by the ALJ regarding public access to a particular docket or documents.
( d ) *Procedure.* Not later than 10 days after the ALJ's decision forming the basis of an interlocutory appeal of right or not later than 10 days after the ALJ's decision granting an interlocutory appeal for cause, a party must file a notice of interlocutory appeal, with supporting documents, and the party must serve a copy of the notice and supporting documents on each party. Not later than 10 days after service of the appeal brief, a party must file a reply brief, if any, and the party must serve a copy of the reply brief on each party. The TSA decision maker must render a decision on the interlocutory appeal, on the record and as a part of the decision in the proceedings, within a reasonable time after receipt of the interlocutory appeal.
( e ) *Frivolous appeals.* The TSA decision maker may reject frivolous, repetitive, or dilatory appeals, and may issue an order precluding one or more parties from making further interlocutory appeals in a proceeding in which there have been frivolous, repetitive, or dilatory interlocutory appeals.
[74 FR 36039, July 21, 2009, as amended at 75 FR 58334, Sept. 24, 2010]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, April 6, 1995 (57), Para 57.18 Conforming Committees and Officers of the House]
[Page 594]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.57.18  conforming committees and officers of the House

  Mr. THOMAS, by unanimous consent, submitted for consideration the bill 
(H.R. 1421) to provide that references in the statutes of the United 
States to any committee or officer of the House of Representatives the 
name or jurisdiction of which was changed as part of the reorganization 
of the House of Representatives at the beginning of the One Hundred 
Fourth Congress shall be treated as referring to the currently 
applicable committee or officer of the House of Representatives.
  When said bill was considered, read twice, ordered to be engrossed and 
read a third time, was read a third time by title, and passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said bill was passed was, by 
unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.
```