alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Peter Weaver <RPWeaver@ilta.org>

To: Dallas Burkholder/AA/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Katie Vassalli <KVassalli@ilta.org>

Date: 08/31/2012 01:36 PM

Subject: 8/30 Notice Requesting Comment on Letters Seeking Waiver of RFS

Good afternoon Dallas,

In reviewing EPA’s aforementioned notice, we see that a correction identifies the publication date as 

having been delayed by three days. Correspondingly, one would reasonably expect the required receipt 

date to have been extended to maintain the stated 30-day period.

I am writing to ask if EPA will be sending an update to revise the submission deadline appropriately to 

September 29, 2012, allowing for 30 days to comment following constructive notice.

Thank you for your consideration,

- Peter

R. Peter Weaver

Director of Regulatory Compliance and Safety

International Liquid Terminals Association

1005 N. Glebe Rd., Suite 600

Arlington, VA, 22201

(703) 875-2011

www.ilta.org
EX-10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 OF THE AERIE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 

2005 STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT of the Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2005 Stock Option Plan is dated as of December 3, 2009. 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) has adopted and the stockholders of the Company have approved the Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2005 Stock
Option Plan, as previously amended by that certain First Amendment of Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2005 Stock Option Plan (collectively, the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interest of the Company to amend the Plan as more particularly set forth below. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows: 
 The first sentence of Paragraph 4 of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof: 
 Subject to adjustment as provided in Paragraph 9 below, the maximum number of shares of Stock which may be issued pursuant to Options granted under the Plan shall be Five Million, Three Hundred Thousand
(5,300,000) shares. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Secretary of the Company certifies that the foregoing Second
Amendment to the Plan was duly adopted by the Board of Directors. 
  

			
	AERIE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ William N. Wofford
		 	William N. Wofford, Secretary
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration



### VIA E-MAIL

David Y. Bannard, Esq. Foley & Lardner LLP 111 Huntington Ave Boston, MA 02199 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591

November20, 2015

Re: Skydive Myrtle Beach, Inc. v. Horry County Department ofAirports, FAA Docket No. 16-14-05 (regulations.gov docket FAA-2014-0538)
Dear Mr. Bannard: Enclosed are copies ofdocuments requested in your November 17 letterto Mr. Robert Hawks, which constitute the administrative record forthe Director's Determination dated October7, 2015. We also are working to ensure all documents constituting the administrative record are added to the electronic docket at regulations.gov docket number FAA-2014-0538. We hopethis response is helpful.

Sharon Long Part 16 Docket Cle
cc: Robert G. Eastman EnclosuresCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFYthat on November20, 2015, I caused to be emailed atrue copy ofthe foregoing LETTER addressed to:
Counsel for Complainant Robert G. Eastman, Esq. Eastman & Associates, LLC P.O. Box 180 Charleston, SC 29402 robertgeastman@msn.com Counsel for Respondent David Y. Bannard, Esq. Jeffrey R. Blease, Esq. Jaclyn V. Piltch, Esq. Foley & Lardner LLP 111 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA02199 dbannard@foley.com jblease@foley.com jpiltch@foley.com Hand-delivered and emailed to: FAA Part 16Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-600) FAA Office ofAirport Compliance and ManagementAnalysis (AC0-100)

haron Long Part 16 Docket Clerk FAA Office ofthe Chief Counsel
-----Original Message----- 

From: dacollins46@hotmail.com [mailto:dacollins46@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:28 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

David Collins 

115 E Main ST 

Flemingsburg, KY 41041
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                                WASHINGTON, D.C.


                                  FORM 10-K/A


                       AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION OR REPORT
                   FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12, 13 or 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                          CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)


The undersigned registrant hereby amends the following items, financial
statements, exhibits or other portions of its Annual Report Pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, as set forth in the pages attached
hereto.

Pursuant to Rule 15d-21 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this amendment
is being made to add the information, financial statements, and exhibits
required by Form 11-K with respect to the CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY EMPLOYEE
SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN FOR NON-UNION EMPLOYEES and to the CENTRAL MAINE
POWER COMPANY EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN FOR UNION EMPLOYEES, as
Exhibits 99-1 and 99-2, respectively.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this amendment to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                           CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY


 
                           By
                           Michael W. Caron, Comptroller
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 16, 1995 (67), Para 67.13 Clean Water Amendments]
[Page 703]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.67.13  clean water amendments

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BARRETT, pursuant to House Resolution 140 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the further consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 961) to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.
  Mr. McINNIS, Chairman of the Committee of the Whole, resumed the 
chair; and after some time spent therein,
```
#### Henry Hildreth, *Respondent, v.*City of Troy, *Appellant.*

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
-----Original Message----- 

From: JakeSnider81@gmail.com [mailto:JakeSnider81@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:29 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jake Snider 

1012 E. McDaniel Apt 14 

Springfield, MO 65806
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                            5

<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 (UNAUDITED)
AND THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     MAR-31-1997

<PERIOD-START>                        APR-01-1996

<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1996

<CASH>                                     400,024

<SECURITIES>                                     0

<RECEIVABLES>                            8,811,178

<ALLOWANCES>                                     0

<INVENTORY>                              4,536,423

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        14,102,969

<PP&E>                                 116,023,840

<DEPRECIATION>                          49,372,197

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          82,916,884

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   12,638,923

<BONDS>                                  8,545,144

<COMMON>                                   961,132


<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0

<PREFERRED>                                      0

<OTHER-SE>                              31,928,639

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            82,916,884

<SALES>                                 68,159,660

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        68,250,608

<CGS>                                   61,873,783

<TOTAL-COSTS>                           61,873,783

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         1,317,671

<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       2,494,336

<INCOME-PRETAX>                          2,564,818

<INCOME-TAX>                                     0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      2,564,818

<DISCONTINUED>                                   0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0

<CHANGES>                                        0

<NET-INCOME>                             2,564,818

<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 2.74

<EPS-DILUTED>                                 2.74
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the  annual report of Viropro, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: May 15, 2003                       By: /s/ Hugh Johnson

--------------------------------

Hugh Johnson, President
#### In the Matter of Salome Loew to Vacate an Assessment, etc.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinions by

Brady, P. J., and Daniels, J.
§ 56.10-5 Pipe. ( a ) *General.* Pipe and tubing must be selected as described in table 1 to § 56.60-1.
( b ) *Ferrous pipe.* ASTM A53/A53M (incorporated by reference, see § 56.01-2) furnace welded pipe must not be used for combustible or flammable liquids within machinery spaces. (See §§ 30.10-15 and 30.10-22 of this chapter for definitions of combustible and flammable liquids.)
( c ) *Nonferrous pipe.* (See also § 56.60-20.) ( 1 ) Copper and brass pipe for water and steam service may be used for design pressures up to 250 psig and for design temperatures to 406 °F.
( 2 ) Copper and brass pipe for air may be used in accordance with the allowable stresses of the materials found from table 1 to § 56.60-1.
( 3 ) Copper-nickel alloys may be used for water and steam service within the design limits of stress and temperature indicated in ASME B31.1 (incorporated by reference; see § 56.01-2).
( 4 ) Copper tubing may be used for instrument service up to 1,000 psig.
( 5 ) Copper, brass, or aluminum pipe or tube must not be used for flammable fluids except where specifically permitted by this part.
( 6 ) Aluminum-alloy pipe or tube along with similar junction equipment may be used within the limitation stated in 124.7 of ASME B31.1 and paragraph (c)(5) of this section.
( d ) *Nonmetallic pipe.* Plastic pipe may be used subject to the conditions described in § 56.60-25.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18843, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGFR 69-127, 35 FR 9978, June 17, 1970; CGFR 72-59R, 37 FR 6189, Mar. 25, 1972; CGD 77-140, 54 FR 40602, Oct. 2, 1989; CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51200, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58460, Sept. 29, 2000; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65175, Oct. 31, 2008]
exv10w24



 






Exhibit 10.24




Summary of Executive Officer Compensation




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	Executive	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Annual Compensation	 	 	 	 
	 	Officer	 	 	Base Annual Salary	 	 	Annual Bonus	 	 	under MBO Program	 	 	Other Compensation	 
	 	Robert Schneider

	 	 	€350,0001
	 	 	50% of base salary,
if Registrant makes
an operating profit
for full year
	 	 	N/A
	 	 	Use of Company car	 
	 	Steven Moore

	 	 	$200,0001
	 	 	50% of base salary,
evenly split
between three
criteria: 1) no
material weakness
in internal
controls for
financial
reporting; 2)
achieve certain
financial staff
recruiting
objectives by the
end of Q4; and 3)
reduce year over
year Q4 G&A
expenses by
$450,000.
	 	 	N/A	 	 	 	 
	 	Colas Overkott

	 	 	€200,0001
	 	 	N/A
	 	 	Up to €40,000 upon
achievement of
objectives in
accordance with MBO
Program
	 	 	Use of Company car
or car allowance
 

Up to €2,500
annually for tax
consulting
resulting from
European residency
outside Germany	 
	 	Ingo Zankel

	 	 	€200,000
	 	 	Up to €100,000
upon achievement of
annual targets
established by the
Board of Directors
and CEO.
	 	 	Up to €50,000 upon
achievement of
objectives in
accordance with MBO
Program
	 	 	Use of Company car
or up to €1,250
monthly in car
allowance	 
	 	Manfred Mueller

	 	 	€110,0001
	 	 	Annual bonus of €
6,000 upon
completion of
specific projects.
	 	 	Up to 16.67% of
base salary upon
achievement of
objectives set by
CEO.
	 	 	Use of Company car	 
	 






	1	 	This number reflects the officer’s base salary as established by SCM Microsystems’ Board of
Directors, prior to the officer’s participation in the executive compensation arrangement
described in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2004, pursuant to
which such officer may opt to receive an option to purchase 50 shares of the Company’s Common
Stock for each $100 reduction in annual base salary.
From: chuck@chuckdupree.com [mailto:chuck@chuckdupree.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:37 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I write in support of the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Chuck Dupree 

20 Minerva Street 

San Francisco, CA 94112
#### § 1.24 Under Secretary of Transportation for Policy.

The Under Secretary provides leadership in the Department's development of policies and programs to protect and enhance the safety, adequacy, and efficiency of the transportation system and services. The Office of the Under Secretary serves as the focal point within the Federal Government for coordination of intermodal transportation policy, which brings together departmental intermodal perspectives, advocates intermodal interests, and provides secretarial leadership and visibility on issues that involve or affect more than one Operating Administration.
2 

11 

116 Nev. 1124, 1127, 13 P.3d 947, 949 (2000). The district court conducted 

an evidentiary hearing on appellant's motion, considered the totality of the 

circumstances, including the preliminary hearing transcript and a 

videotape of the encounter, and determined that Trooper Ames had 

reasonable suspicion to detain appellant and that the detention was not 

unconstitutionally lengthy. State v. Rincon, 122 Nev. 1170, 1173-74, 147 

P.3d 223, 235-36 (2006); NRS 171.123(1). The district court also concluded 

that appellant voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently consented to the 

search of the vehicle and that the Trooper's brief retrieval of a sweater 

from the vehicle, at appellant's request, did not invalidate appellant's 

written consent. McMorran v. State, 118 Nev. 379, 383, 46 P.3d 81, 83 

(2002); see also Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 248-49 (1973). 

We conclude that the district court's findings were not clearly erroneous 

and that the district court did not err by denying appellant's motion to 

suppress. 

Appellant argues that the district court failed to read a 

requirement of one ounce or more into the transportation-of-a-controlledsubstance count and that, without the allegation of an amount, the count 

should have been dismissed. Questions of statutory interpretation are 

reviewed de novo, and our interpretation is controlled by legislative intent; 

if the statute is clear on its face, we will not look beyond the statute's plain 

meaning to determine legislative intent. State v. Lucero, 127 Nev. , 

249 P.3d 1226, 1228 (2011). NRS 453.321 contains no language that 

would require the State to allege or prove a certain amount of controlled 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 
J. 

substance. 2As an element of weight was not included in the plain 

language of the statute, we will not create it; therefore, the district court 

did not err when it declined to impose a weight requirement into the 

statute. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the conviction AFFIRMED. 

cc: Hon. Alvin R. Kacin, District Judge 

Elko County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Elko County District Attorney 

Elko County Clerk 

2NRS 453.321(1) states, in pertinent part, that "it is unlawful for a 

person to: (a) [i] mport, transport, sell, exchange, barter, supply, prescribe, 

dispense, give away or administer a controlled or counterfeit substance." 

3 

I
From: sara9katz@gmail.com [mailto:sara9katz@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:17 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sara Katz 

6166 Buena Vista Avenue 

Oakland, CA 94618
#### § 31.15-5 Tank barges—B/ALL.

Tank barges subject to the provisions of this subchapter need not be manned unless, in the judgment of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, such manning is necessary for the protection of life and property and for the safe operation of the vessel.

[CGD 81-059, 54 FR 151, Jan. 4, 1989]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending May 23, 2009

|Filer                              | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                                 
|---------------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|BARCLAYS BANK PLC                  | FBSEA          | Barclays Bank PLC, London, England, to establish an additional branch in New York, New York, pursuant to Section 211.24(a)(2)(i)(A) of Regulation K.      | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                         | Not available 
|Federal Register:                  | Not applicable
|CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE | FBSEA          | Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Toronto, Canada to establish an agency in New York, New York, pursuant to Section 211.24(a)(1)(i)(A) of Regulation K. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                         | Not available 
|Federal Register:                  | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Third Quarter of 2009 (July 1, 2009 - September 30, 2009)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-11-00137-CR

JAMES EDWARD PEARSON

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 10-CR-2061-E

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 6, 2014
###### Editorial Note on Part 190

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 190 appear at 78 FR 58908, Sept. 25, 2013.

#### § 190.241 Finality.

Except as otherwise provided by § 190.243, an order directing amendment issued under § 190.206, a final order issued under § 190.213, a corrective action order issued under § 190.233, or a safety order issued under § 190.239 is considered final administrative action on that enforcement proceeding.

[Amdt. 190-16, 78 FR 58913, Sept. 25, 2013]
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.233 Miter joints. ( a ) A miter joint on steel pipe to be operated at a pressure that produces a hoop stress of 30 percent or more of SMYS may not deflect the pipe more than 3°.
( b ) A miter joint on steel pipe to be operated at a pressure that produces a hoop stress of less than 30 percent, but more than 10 percent, of SMYS may not deflect the pipe more than 121 ⁄ 2° and must be a distance equal to one pipe diameter or more away from any other miter joint, as measured from the crotch of each joint.
( c ) A miter joint on steel pipe to be operated at a pressure that produces a hoop stress of 10 percent or less of SMYS may not deflect the pipe more than 90°.