alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - II (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General Partner and
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

        (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  the operations of the Partnership.


              May 16, 2005                    /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
              ------------                    ------------------------------
                  Date                        Joseph M. Jayson,
                                              Individual General Partner and
                                              Principal Financial Officer
From: pdavison2@gmail.com [mailto:pdavison2@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 6:16 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Patricia Davison 

38 Horseshoe Lane 

Sulphur, LA 70663
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2241 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2241

 To make permanent the President's Outer Continental Shelf moratorium 
                      statement of June 26, 1990.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 4, 1995

  Mr. Riggs  (for himself, Mr. Zimmer, Mr. Klug, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. 
  Filner, Mr. Packard, Mr. Jones, Mr. Bilbray, Ms. Harman, Mr. Cox of 
California, Mr. Torres, Mrs. Seastrand, Mr. Hunter, Ms. Roybal-Allard, 
Ms. Norton, Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Berman, Mr. Farr, Mr. Johnston of Florida, 
  Mr. Horn, and Ms. Lofgren) introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make permanent the President's Outer Continental Shelf moratorium 
                      statement of June 26, 1990.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PERMANENT MORATORIUM.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall not conduct any oil and gas 
preleasing, leasing, or development activities under the Outer 
Continental Shelf Lands Act in any area placed under restriction by the 
President's moratorium statement of June 26, 1990. This section shall 
cease to be effective on January 1, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MYR Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William A. Koertner, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

November 9,
2009

/s/ WILLIAM A. KOERTNER Chief Executive Officer and President


---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

[Crestmark Bank Letterhead]


                                                                  April 24, 2003


Bruce J. Barrett, President
Somanetics Corporation
1652 E. Maple Road
Troy, Michigan 48083-4208

      RE:  Renewal Commitment Fee

Dear Mr. Barrett:

      Pursuant to our conversation, if Somanetics Corporation ("Borrower")
wishes to maintain its lending relationship with Crestmark Bank (the "Bank"), we
hereby request that Borrower remit to the Bank a renewal commitment fee in the
amount of $5,000, which fee shall be applicable for the remainder of the 2003
calendar year. If Borrower would like to continue the lending relationship into
2004, please contact us prior to year-end so that we can negotiate the terms of
a new lending relationship.

      Further, please be advised that the Bank will no longer perform
month-end reconciliations on behalf of Borrower, unless Borrower informs the
Bank that it intends to draw on its line of credit. If Borrower wishes to use
its line of credit, please inform the Bank at least thirty (30) days in advance.

      If you have any questions concerning the renewal commitment fee, please
do not hesitate to contact me. Please acknowledge your receipt and understanding
of this correspondence by signing below and returning an executed copy to me.

Sincerely,
/s/ Thomas Frattini
-------------------
Thomas Frattini
Assistant Vice President

THE FOREGOING IS ACCEPTABLE:
SOMANETICS CORPORATION
By:/s/ Bruce J. Barrett
-----------------------
Bruce J. Barrett
Its:  President
-----Original Message----- 

From: davidmarriott2000@yahoo.com [mailto:davidmarriott2000@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:18 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

David Marriott 

1260 11 Mile Rd. 

Berkley,, MI 48072
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier: 

### 9 8

- CE

- 0 0 1

-AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet


### Inspection 11.0 $ 935.00 $40 $ 975.00 

### 1,196 $1,166,100.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products i n compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1,166,100 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**O n**  **- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product



### Replacement 5.0 $ 4 25.00 $ 

### 50 0 $ 925.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can al so be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regu latory Flexibility Act:**  Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska

. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
-----Original Message----- 

From: ltaketa@earthlink.net [mailto:ltaketa@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:38 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Mental health problems underlie many physical health and 

social problems. If we can get people better access (through insurance 

coverage that is equal to physical health insurance coverage) to mental 

health care, we help build a healthier society overall. Thank you for 

ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lori Taketa 

PO Box 650 

Eureka, CA 95502
-----Original Message----- 

From: viles.zoe@wanadoo.fr [mailto:viles.zoe@wanadoo.fr] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:03 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

zoe viles 

224 east houghton 

santa fe, NM 87505
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 37259

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JOHN ROBERT MOSHER,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2011 Unpublished Opinion No. 345

Filed: February 8, 2011

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Kootenai County. Hon. John T. Mitchell, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and suspended unified sentence of ten years, with a 

minimum period of confinement of two years, for delivery of a controlled 

substance, affirmed.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

______________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

John Robert Mosher was found guilty of delivery of a controlled substance. I.C. § 37-

2732(a)(1)(B). The district court sentenced Mosher to a unified term of ten years, with a 

minimum period of confinement of two years, but retained jurisdiction. Following successful 

completion of his rider, the district court suspended Moser’s sentence and placed him on 

probation. Mosher filed an I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, which the district court 

denied. Mosher appeals, arguing that his suspended sentence is excessive.

1

 

1 Mosher was also found guilty and sentenced for two misdemeanors. However, he does 

not challenge these judgments of conviction or sentences on appeal. 
2

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Mosher’s judgment of conviction and suspended sentence are affirmed.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, June 22, 1995 (85), Para 85.10 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1032]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.85.10  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. CLINGER:

       Page 20, after line 10, insert the following:
       In addition, for salaries and expenses of the Congressional 
     Budget Office necessary to carry out the provisions of title 
     I of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1965 (Pub. L. 104-
     4), as authorized by section 109 of such Act, $1,100,000.
       Page 26, beginning on line 12, strike ``operation and 
     maintenance of the American Folklife Center in the 
     Library;''.
       Page 26, line 19, after the first dollar figure, insert the 
     following: ``(less $1,165,000)''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

260

affirmative

Nays

159
```
§ 209.335 Penalties. ( a ) Any individual who violates § 209.331(c) or § 209.333(a) may be permanently disqualified from performing the safety-sensitive functions described in § 209.303. Any individual who willfully violates § 209.331(c) or § 209.333(a) may also be assessed a civil penalty of at least $1,000 and not more than $5,000 per violation.
( b ) Any railroad that violates § 209.331 (a) or (b) or § 209.333(b) may be assessed a civil penalty of at least $5,000 and not more than $11,000 per violation.
( c ) Each day a violation continues shall constitute a separate offense.
[54 FR 42907, Oct. 18, 1989, as amended at 63 FR 11619, Mar. 10, 1998]
#### Fogg *v.*Towle.

A person authorized to collect a debt, taking without authority an order payable to himself, drawn by the debtor and accepted by a third person, does not thereby become liable to the creditor for money had and received.

*118Nor is he rendered liable by the promise of the acceptor to give him credit for the amount of the order oil a debt due from him to a firm, of which the acceptor is a member, when, the promise has not been performed.

Assumpsit, for money had and received by the defendant of one Lamprey for the plaintiff. Facts found by a referee. The plaintiff’s attorney sent the defendant, a deputy sheriff, a trustee' writ in favor of the plaintiff against one Jennell. The defendant, without authority, took an order for the amount of the debt, payable to himself, drawn by Jennell and accepted by Lamprey. Lamprey, being a member of a firm to whom the defendant was indebted, agreed to credit the defendant with the amount of the order on the debt due from the defendant to the firm; but this he has not done. He is bankrupt, and the firm have sued the defendant for the full amount of his debt.

*Andrews*and *Stevens*Parker, for the plaintiff.

Towle, for the defendant.

Bingham, J.

The defendant is not rendered liable for money' had and received by the fact that he did .not insert Lamprey’s name in the writ as trustee, and did not serve the writ on him; nor by his taking the accepted order without the plaintiff’s authority ; nor by Lamprey’s unexecuted proposition. The defendant’s unauthorized action not being ratified by the plaintiff, Jennell is still the plaintiff’s debtor. No part of the defendant’s debt to Lamprey’s firm has been paid, and the defendant has received nothing of value for which he is liable to the plaintiff as for money had and received. Had the defendant been liable for not serving the writ, his liability could not be enforced in this form of action. The case would have been different if the amount Jennell owed the plaintiff had been received by the defendant from Lamprey in cash, or in a cancellation of an equal amount of the defendant’s debt to Lamprey’s firm; or if, by mutual agreement, Jennell’s debt to the plaintiff, and the same amount of Lalnprey’s debt to Jennell, and the same amount of the defendant’s debt to Lamprey’s firm, had been extinguished, and the plaintiff had accepted the defendant as paymaster in place of Jpnnell, and Lamprey’s firm had accepted Lamprey as paymaster in place of the defendant. If the plaintiff had chosen to ratify what had been done for his benefit by bringing a suit in the defendant’s name against Lamprey upon the accepted order, the plaintiff would have had all he was entitled to gain by a ratification of the defendant’s unauthorized act of taking the order.

*Judgment for the*defendant.

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
§ 213.309 Restoration or renewal of track under traffic conditions. ( a ) Restoration or renewal of track under traffic conditions is limited to the replacement of worn, broken, or missing components or fastenings that do not affect the safe passage of trains.
( b ) The following activities are expressly prohibited under traffic conditions: ( 1 ) Any work that interrupts rail continuity, e.g., as in joint bar replacement or rail replacement;
( 2 ) Any work that adversely affects the lateral or vertical stability of the track with the exception of spot tamping an isolated condition where not more than 15 lineal feet of track are involved at any one time and the ambient air temperature is not above 95 degrees Fahrenheit; and
( 3 ) Removal and replacement of the rail fastenings on more than one tie at a time within 15 feet.
EXHIBIT
      23.1





CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM









We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (No.
      333-113851) on Form S-8 of Champion Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries of
      our report dated January 25, 2008, on our audit of the consolidated financial
      statements, and the financial statement schedule, which appear in the
      Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report
      on
      Form 10-K of Champion Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended
      October 31, 2007.







/s/ ARNETT
      & FOSTER, P.L.L.C.







Charleston,
      West Virginia


January
      25, 2008
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Robert R. Jones, III, certify that:1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Bancorporation of Alabama, Inc.(the “Registrant”);2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;4.     The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and have:(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this            quarterly report is being prepared;(b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report basedon such evaluation; and(c)     Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting;5.     The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit

 
committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 10, 2005                                                           /s/ Robert R. Jones, III    Robert R. Jones, III    Interim Principal Accounting Officer
MAPS

513
§ 179.220-3 Type. ( a ) Tanks built under these specifications must consist of an inner container, a support system for the inner container, and an outer shell.
( b ) The inner container must be a fusion welded tank of circular cross section with formed heads designed convex outward and must have a manway on top of the tank as prescribed herein. When the inner container is divided into compartments, each compartment must be considered a separate container.
( c ) The outer shell must be a fusion welded tank with formed heads designed convex outward.
[Amdt. 179-9, 36 FR 21340, Nov. 6, 1971]
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Paper Writings Propounded as the Last Will, Testament and Codicil of Malvina M. Seabra, *Deceased.—*

Decree and the three orders appealed from reversed, with costs of the appeal from the decree only payable out of the fund in the final award of costs. Opinion by

Barker, J.